Datasets:

CFettuccini

/

DollylikeDFMPC

like 0

['>>{pastamon888} : The US is imposing a "laptop ban" on flights from 10 airports in majority-Muslim countries', '>>{nawazsagri10} : Latest Pixel leaks give comprehensive look at the Pixel smartphones', ">>{Giroflex} : Honestly doesn't look all that special. The points that are made are mostly about Google apps available on any phone and I can't get over the huge useless forehead on the bottom. Its only hope, I think, is if its price is really good for the specs.", ">>{bloodfrenzy187} : I understand the potential concern but not the way it is being implemented. It's still targeting Muslim majority countries instead of being broad sweeping. So instead of taking the appearance of a security risk it looks like targeted xenophobia.", ">>{SATexas1} : Britain joined the ban, there must be a specific threat they're aware of. I think this is a legit security issue and not political.", ">>{Sylanthra} : Hello iPhone my old friend I've come to talk with you again. In all seriousness, the appearance seems to lack just about all spark or creativity. Maybe there is something amazing under the hood, but based on the visuals, there is no reason to buy it. (Unless you are an iPhone user who wants to switch do Android but doesn't want people to immediately realize your defection.)", ">>{bloodfrenzy187} : If so it should cover all airlines then. Not just airlines coming to and from certain prominently Muslim countries. Wouldn't that make us even safer?", '>>{President_Tantrump} : This is proof that no one will say NO to Trump. 95% of anyone hearing this proposal should have said "Donald, no. No, Donald".', ">>{Vicious43} : Republican Michigan elector says he's received DEATH THREATS ordering him to change his vote to Clinton or his 'brains will be blown out'", '>>{dkliberator} : The brainless need not worry about threats like these.', ">>{solefald} : Because banning electronic devices on all inbound flights on all airlines is fucking moronic? But I guess you don't have much grasp on reality.", '>>{Maxi__W} : Does it come with an apple sticker for the back?', '>>{yhwhx} : And not just "death threats" but "DEATH THREATS".', ">>{SATexas1} : It's inbound airlines as far as I know (not outbound), they said it was an Al Qaeda threat http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/21/politics/electronics-ban-devices-explosives-intelligence/", '>>{bloodfrenzy187} : Your need to hurl insults is infantile. Try holding a conversation like an adult.', '>>{DrMcMeow} : It could be a tactic from the alt-left trolls.', ">>{solefald} : I didn't insult you. I just pointed it out. Honestly, I think you should have it looked at. Also, having adult conversation with someone who thinks like that is impossible.", '>>{smitemight} : Is that when people here are doing mental gymnastics over this device?', ">>{ElJefedeTeamOscar} : If these things really do start at $649, all I can hope for is a surprise Nexus 5 v.3 announcement. I'd really like to stay in the 'immediate update' Google ecosystem, but not for iPhone money.", '>>{hairy_chicken} : You are both being jerks. Smarten up or its straight to your room without dinner.', '>>{hederaleaf} : This is the wrong take. Why should the ban be broader to cover a specific threat? It should be only as broad as necessary. The Muslim ban, versions one and two, were both clearly unlawful, and likely *increase* the chance that something terrible will be done to Americans at home or abroad. This is not that.', '>>{TDaltonC} : HTC phones had that look before the iPhone6 came out.', ">>{contantofaz} : I can't even believe that is an actual headline from the article. But the NSA, FBI etc will have to have total control over people's online identities in order to punish things like this. Even these Reddit anonymous accounts may have their expiration date set to some time in 2017. Fake news sites? Who are those behind them? Phone number? Who is behind them? Take a picture using the phone's camera and send it to the NSA while you're at it.", ">>{low_key_like_thor} : It's hard to make a cellphone with truly creative design. Screens are rectangles, we gave to have rounded corners, and our hands rest towards the bottom. There's really not a lot of room for new ideas.", ">>{bloodfrenzy187} : I'm not saying it is the same type of thing. But outwardly it does have some of that appearance. Maybe what I'm saying is getting somewhat lost in translation or such.", '>>{catl1keth1ef} : The ban is targeting specific airports, not specific countries. My guess is that those airports need to upgrade some screening processes to comply.', '>>{TinyBaron} : I wonder if this meeting with airline executives had more to do with this rather than a terrorist threat. http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-airline-ceo-meeting-2017-2', '>>{bigbrave} : Given the UK implemented the same thing, this doesn\'t appear to be specifically targeted at Muslims (many travelers affected coming from these affluent countries are white businessmen and women after all with US passports). It is also to address the specific threat of bombs being concealed as batteries in laptops so it\'s not just some open ended restriction in the name of "security." Totally understand why it looks that way given our Mango in Chief\'s recent history but this sounds like it\'s based on legit Intel. Let\'s try not to get up in arms without looking at the full story lest we risk becoming the little boy who cried wolf.', ">>{jehsn} : I don't believe this argument holds up anymore. So many unique phone designs have been released in the past year that don't look quite as similar. The Nextbit Robin would be the most dramatically different example. Samsung did a lot to differentiate itself, and now they have a stellar design language that I think they can really call their own with the S7 Edge and the Note 7. In my opinion, those two devices have some of the most interesting designs on the market right now. And Motorola and Sony have always been doing their own respective things, and with the Z family and the ZX, this year is no different. Hell, I don't think that any point in Google's Nexus series, including the 6P that I'm typing this on, ever brushed so close to the contemporary iPhone design.", ">>{LBJ20XX} : Hell, there's basically no left at all right now.", '>>{hederaleaf} : There exists, we might infer, a specific Salafi-jihadi threat involving larger electronic devices (e.g, laptops, tablets). FVEY nations are responding to that threat in a specific, targeted manner: that is, by ordering that flights out of ten (10) specific airports force passengers to check such devices. It may well be that this ban is not broad enough; it may well be that someone flying out of Jakarta intends to do the unthinkable, not someone flying out of Cairo, and that the FVEY intelligence services have missed their mark. Maybe we should cover all airlines, just in case, right? I want you to consider the possibility, though, that your objection has more to do with the optics and domestic politics of the matter and not the safety and security of those that governments are commissioned to protect.', '>>{Vicious43} : If you capitalize it it makes it more EXTREME!!!', ">>{Whipit} : Well they should try because it's not impossible. I can spot a new Samsung S7 or Note 7 from across the street because they actually do look so different. The pixel on the other hand looks like a cheap Chinese iphone ripoff.", ">>{Robthedawg} : I don't like who you voted for...so i'm going to send you a bunch of death threats Thats so fucking stupid.", '>>{RedWine32} : $649?? One Plus 3 it is.', ">>{asagdw} : This was literally my first thought. I was waiting for price confirmation, but my only concern now is that the OP3 doesn't support T-Mobile WiFi calling, which is a feature I desperately need where I live. I'm now considering a discounted Nexus 6P.", '>>{Allanon_2020} : Exactly Just like the hate crimes are false flags by the supposed victims No one does anything, all false flags', '>>{Vicious43} : You really need to worry about the ctrl shift left.', '>>{Ornery_Pickle} : Who cares what it looks like? When Muslims stop blowing shit up and killing people in the name of allah they can stop being targeted.', '>>{justviewing2} : Yeah, this sounds right out of the alt-right play book', ">>{ElJefedeTeamOscar} : I'm with you. I had dumb phones until the original Nexus 5. I think $349-$399 is my ceiling.", ">>{NekronOfTheBlack} : HuffPo is an aggregator. I guess LGBT rights, minority rights, women's rights, climate change action, etc... are alt-left. Alt-righties are extremists if that's the bullshit they believe.", ">>{Shylady333} : This effort is America's last best hope and I wouldn't waste my time with a 22 year old. If we are going to be subjected to this BS the electoral college should be nonpartisan kind of like a judge. Either way, for those of you sending letters please state your case respectfully and remember that there is plenty of subject matter for us.", ">>{IvankaDrumpf} : HuffPo is a terrible collection of racists. And hypocrites. http://m.imgur.com/a/7XCLJ If you don't find anything wrong with these headlines, you may be an alt-lefty.", ">>{IvankaDrumpf} : I don't think you know what that word means. What am i deflecting from?", ">>{IvankaDrumpf} : What was I deflecting from? If you don't know a word just look it up next time."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Vicious43} : Republican Michigan elector says he's received DEATH THREATS ordering him to change his vote to Clinton or his 'brains will be blown out'", '>>{dkliberator} : The brainless need not worry about threats like these.', '>>{yhwhx} : And not just "death threats" but "DEATH THREATS".', '>>{DrMcMeow} : It could be a tactic from the alt-left trolls.', ">>{contantofaz} : I can't even believe that is an actual headline from the article. But the NSA, FBI etc will have to have total control over people's online identities in order to punish things like this. Even these Reddit anonymous accounts may have their expiration date set to some time in 2017. Fake news sites? Who are those behind them? Phone number? Who is behind them? Take a picture using the phone's camera and send it to the NSA while you're at it.", ">>{LBJ20XX} : Hell, there's basically no left at all right now.", '>>{Vicious43} : If you capitalize it it makes it more EXTREME!!!', ">>{Robthedawg} : I don't like who you voted for...so i'm going to send you a bunch of death threats Thats so fucking stupid.", '>>{Allanon_2020} : Exactly Just like the hate crimes are false flags by the supposed victims No one does anything, all false flags', '>>{Vicious43} : You really need to worry about the ctrl shift left.', '>>{justviewing2} : Yeah, this sounds right out of the alt-right play book', ">>{NekronOfTheBlack} : HuffPo is an aggregator. I guess LGBT rights, minority rights, women's rights, climate change action, etc... are alt-left. Alt-righties are extremists if that's the bullshit they believe.", ">>{Shylady333} : This effort is America's last best hope and I wouldn't waste my time with a 22 year old. If we are going to be subjected to this BS the electoral college should be nonpartisan kind of like a judge. Either way, for those of you sending letters please state your case respectfully and remember that there is plenty of subject matter for us.", ">>{IvankaDrumpf} : HuffPo is a terrible collection of racists. And hypocrites. http://m.imgur.com/a/7XCLJ If you don't find anything wrong with these headlines, you may be an alt-lefty.", ">>{IvankaDrumpf} : I don't think you know what that word means. What am i deflecting from?", ">>{IvankaDrumpf} : What was I deflecting from? If you don't know a word just look it up next time."], ['>>{nawazsagri10} : Latest Pixel leaks give comprehensive look at the Pixel smartphones', ">>{Giroflex} : Honestly doesn't look all that special. The points that are made are mostly about Google apps available on any phone and I can't get over the huge useless forehead on the bottom. Its only hope, I think, is if its price is really good for the specs.", ">>{Sylanthra} : Hello iPhone my old friend I've come to talk with you again. In all seriousness, the appearance seems to lack just about all spark or creativity. Maybe there is something amazing under the hood, but based on the visuals, there is no reason to buy it. (Unless you are an iPhone user who wants to switch do Android but doesn't want people to immediately realize your defection.)", '>>{Maxi__W} : Does it come with an apple sticker for the back?', '>>{smitemight} : Is that when people here are doing mental gymnastics over this device?', ">>{ElJefedeTeamOscar} : If these things really do start at $649, all I can hope for is a surprise Nexus 5 v.3 announcement. I'd really like to stay in the 'immediate update' Google ecosystem, but not for iPhone money.", '>>{TDaltonC} : HTC phones had that look before the iPhone6 came out.', ">>{low_key_like_thor} : It's hard to make a cellphone with truly creative design. Screens are rectangles, we gave to have rounded corners, and our hands rest towards the bottom. There's really not a lot of room for new ideas.", ">>{jehsn} : I don't believe this argument holds up anymore. So many unique phone designs have been released in the past year that don't look quite as similar. The Nextbit Robin would be the most dramatically different example. Samsung did a lot to differentiate itself, and now they have a stellar design language that I think they can really call their own with the S7 Edge and the Note 7. In my opinion, those two devices have some of the most interesting designs on the market right now. And Motorola and Sony have always been doing their own respective things, and with the Z family and the ZX, this year is no different. Hell, I don't think that any point in Google's Nexus series, including the 6P that I'm typing this on, ever brushed so close to the contemporary iPhone design.", ">>{Whipit} : Well they should try because it's not impossible. I can spot a new Samsung S7 or Note 7 from across the street because they actually do look so different. The pixel on the other hand looks like a cheap Chinese iphone ripoff.", '>>{RedWine32} : $649?? One Plus 3 it is.', ">>{asagdw} : This was literally my first thought. I was waiting for price confirmation, but my only concern now is that the OP3 doesn't support T-Mobile WiFi calling, which is a feature I desperately need where I live. I'm now considering a discounted Nexus 6P.", ">>{ElJefedeTeamOscar} : I'm with you. I had dumb phones until the original Nexus 5. I think $349-$399 is my ceiling."], ['>>{pastamon888} : The US is imposing a "laptop ban" on flights from 10 airports in majority-Muslim countries', ">>{bloodfrenzy187} : I understand the potential concern but not the way it is being implemented. It's still targeting Muslim majority countries instead of being broad sweeping. So instead of taking the appearance of a security risk it looks like targeted xenophobia.", ">>{SATexas1} : Britain joined the ban, there must be a specific threat they're aware of. I think this is a legit security issue and not political.", ">>{bloodfrenzy187} : If so it should cover all airlines then. Not just airlines coming to and from certain prominently Muslim countries. Wouldn't that make us even safer?", '>>{President_Tantrump} : This is proof that no one will say NO to Trump. 95% of anyone hearing this proposal should have said "Donald, no. No, Donald".', ">>{solefald} : Because banning electronic devices on all inbound flights on all airlines is fucking moronic? But I guess you don't have much grasp on reality.", ">>{SATexas1} : It's inbound airlines as far as I know (not outbound), they said it was an Al Qaeda threat http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/21/politics/electronics-ban-devices-explosives-intelligence/", '>>{bloodfrenzy187} : Your need to hurl insults is infantile. Try holding a conversation like an adult.', ">>{solefald} : I didn't insult you. I just pointed it out. Honestly, I think you should have it looked at. Also, having adult conversation with someone who thinks like that is impossible.", '>>{hairy_chicken} : You are both being jerks. Smarten up or its straight to your room without dinner.', '>>{hederaleaf} : This is the wrong take. Why should the ban be broader to cover a specific threat? It should be only as broad as necessary. The Muslim ban, versions one and two, were both clearly unlawful, and likely *increase* the chance that something terrible will be done to Americans at home or abroad. This is not that.', ">>{bloodfrenzy187} : I'm not saying it is the same type of thing. But outwardly it does have some of that appearance. Maybe what I'm saying is getting somewhat lost in translation or such.", '>>{catl1keth1ef} : The ban is targeting specific airports, not specific countries. My guess is that those airports need to upgrade some screening processes to comply.', '>>{TinyBaron} : I wonder if this meeting with airline executives had more to do with this rather than a terrorist threat. http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-airline-ceo-meeting-2017-2', '>>{bigbrave} : Given the UK implemented the same thing, this doesn\'t appear to be specifically targeted at Muslims (many travelers affected coming from these affluent countries are white businessmen and women after all with US passports). It is also to address the specific threat of bombs being concealed as batteries in laptops so it\'s not just some open ended restriction in the name of "security." Totally understand why it looks that way given our Mango in Chief\'s recent history but this sounds like it\'s based on legit Intel. Let\'s try not to get up in arms without looking at the full story lest we risk becoming the little boy who cried wolf.', '>>{hederaleaf} : There exists, we might infer, a specific Salafi-jihadi threat involving larger electronic devices (e.g, laptops, tablets). FVEY nations are responding to that threat in a specific, targeted manner: that is, by ordering that flights out of ten (10) specific airports force passengers to check such devices. It may well be that this ban is not broad enough; it may well be that someone flying out of Jakarta intends to do the unthinkable, not someone flying out of Cairo, and that the FVEY intelligence services have missed their mark. Maybe we should cover all airlines, just in case, right? I want you to consider the possibility, though, that your objection has more to do with the optics and domestic politics of the matter and not the safety and security of those that governments are commissioned to protect.', '>>{Ornery_Pickle} : Who cares what it looks like? When Muslims stop blowing shit up and killing people in the name of allah they can stop being targeted.']]

classify and reply

['>>{_PresidentTrump} : Poll: Trump is now surging in the deep blue state of New Jersey', '>>{trump_rises} : We will reshape the electorate map and make it great again.', ">>{ArkL} : I saw in a recent poll that Trump was polling even/slightly ahead in Oregon which would be a huge embarrassment for Clinton. That state hasn't gone red in 30+ years.", ">>{likeafox} : Posted for at least the eighth time in two days, this being the second time it's been posted from Sean Hannity's site today.", '>>{dmiller9964} : Trump will be the next president if he plays his cards right. Funny, I nor anyone thought that was possible.', '>>{_PresidentTrump} : Would have been removed if it was posted for the second time on Hannity. Maybe the first guy deleted their post?', ">>{gonzone} : Hannity is dead to me until he honors his promise to be waterboarded to prove it isn't torture.", ">>{duqit} : 38 to 34. so 28% undecided? I suspect that's mostly blue folks who can't quite say they want Hillary. Jersey is blue, but Trump will get close.", '>>{Queen_of_Swords} : The Atlantic City casino mogul is polling well in New Jersey?', ">>{toclosetotheedge} : Polls also have Arizona in play and Clinton in spitting distance of Trump in deep red states like Georgia. Polls don't mean shit this far out", '>>{TrumpOfGod} : Ann Coulter. Scott Adams of Dilbert. A couple of others thought it was going to be him even a year ago. But not many at all even gave him a chance for the Republican nomination. I honestly did not believed it myself. And I am a latino, that started out supporting Hillary about a year ago. **Now its Trump or nothing for me.**', ">>{someguyjusttrying} : This. I can't say Trump is going to win, but he will damn sure draw out ridiculous numbers for the right and major lefty states like California, NJ, and NY are going to see something like 40-45% GOP vs a shrinking Dem turnout. They won't flip, but the colors on the map are starting to change.", '>>{HonoredPeoples} : New polling in Georgia has Trump comfortably ahead of Clinton. It also stated that 50% of the Georgia electorate believes she was responsible for the death of Vince Foster.', '>>{HonoredPeoples} : New Jersey wants to be great again as well.', ">>{maxpenny42} : Can I ask, why? What appeals to you about him. I've heard what Scott Adams has to say about him but I don't get why it works on people. Especially people who know what he is trying to do. He seems like such an obvious huckster to me so I cannot wrap my head around why someone else would fall for his schtick.", ">>{BlueDogDem62} : It's not torture and I've been waterboarded before. It was part of my old career, it is all about your mind set.", '>>{WhiteLycan} : Tell that to Sanders and him touting the only reason superdelegates should support him is because he polls better against Trump.', ">>{likeafox} : Why won't Hannity fulfill his promise and prove it then? [It's for a good cause](http://www.waterboardhannityforcharity.com/). Surely a tough guy like Hannity could take it. For the record, I think Sean Hannity makes blowhards like O'Reilly and Maddow look like Walter Cronkite. He is an ignorant, petty braggart who has willfully mislead the public his entire career. That people are up-voting garbage from his personal website here offends me to my very core.", '>>{BlueDogDem62} : Hannity is an ass and he should do it. I dislike all talking heads. They do more harm than good. I happen to agree with Hannity on this, waterboarding is not torture.', ">>{likeafox} : I respect that you have an opinion colored by your own experience, but there are some pretty high profile veterans that disagree: McCain and Jesse Ventura for a start. And I don't think a semantic argument about whether it qualifies as torture is the only part of the equation. For one thing, there are a number of experts who argue that it's [not effective](http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/an_fbi_interrogator_on_the_effectiveness_of_torture/). And mainly, shouldn't we hold ourselves to a higher standard? If we're willing to push the limits of humane treatment for POW's and detainees, why should any entity ever adhere to the Geneva Conventions or general humane conduct during times of conflict? [A number of Vietnam and CIA veterans](http://www.govexec.com/defense/2005/11/cia-veterans-speak-out-against-torture/20683/) have made strong arguments from this perspective. That the chickenhawk Sean Hannity was one of the most prominent defenders of waterboarding during that entire fiasco has informed my opinion of those who defend the practice: they're less concerned with the moral and practical matter at hand, and more concerned with making sure that American looks 'tough'.", ">>{gonzone} : Sure you have. Pictures or it didn't happen."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{_PresidentTrump} : Poll: Trump is now surging in the deep blue state of New Jersey', '>>{trump_rises} : We will reshape the electorate map and make it great again.', ">>{ArkL} : I saw in a recent poll that Trump was polling even/slightly ahead in Oregon which would be a huge embarrassment for Clinton. That state hasn't gone red in 30+ years.", ">>{likeafox} : Posted for at least the eighth time in two days, this being the second time it's been posted from Sean Hannity's site today.", '>>{dmiller9964} : Trump will be the next president if he plays his cards right. Funny, I nor anyone thought that was possible.', '>>{_PresidentTrump} : Would have been removed if it was posted for the second time on Hannity. Maybe the first guy deleted their post?', ">>{gonzone} : Hannity is dead to me until he honors his promise to be waterboarded to prove it isn't torture.", ">>{duqit} : 38 to 34. so 28% undecided? I suspect that's mostly blue folks who can't quite say they want Hillary. Jersey is blue, but Trump will get close.", '>>{Queen_of_Swords} : The Atlantic City casino mogul is polling well in New Jersey?', ">>{toclosetotheedge} : Polls also have Arizona in play and Clinton in spitting distance of Trump in deep red states like Georgia. Polls don't mean shit this far out", '>>{TrumpOfGod} : Ann Coulter. Scott Adams of Dilbert. A couple of others thought it was going to be him even a year ago. But not many at all even gave him a chance for the Republican nomination. I honestly did not believed it myself. And I am a latino, that started out supporting Hillary about a year ago. **Now its Trump or nothing for me.**', ">>{someguyjusttrying} : This. I can't say Trump is going to win, but he will damn sure draw out ridiculous numbers for the right and major lefty states like California, NJ, and NY are going to see something like 40-45% GOP vs a shrinking Dem turnout. They won't flip, but the colors on the map are starting to change.", '>>{HonoredPeoples} : New polling in Georgia has Trump comfortably ahead of Clinton. It also stated that 50% of the Georgia electorate believes she was responsible for the death of Vince Foster.', '>>{HonoredPeoples} : New Jersey wants to be great again as well.', ">>{maxpenny42} : Can I ask, why? What appeals to you about him. I've heard what Scott Adams has to say about him but I don't get why it works on people. Especially people who know what he is trying to do. He seems like such an obvious huckster to me so I cannot wrap my head around why someone else would fall for his schtick.", ">>{BlueDogDem62} : It's not torture and I've been waterboarded before. It was part of my old career, it is all about your mind set.", '>>{WhiteLycan} : Tell that to Sanders and him touting the only reason superdelegates should support him is because he polls better against Trump.', ">>{likeafox} : Why won't Hannity fulfill his promise and prove it then? [It's for a good cause](http://www.waterboardhannityforcharity.com/). Surely a tough guy like Hannity could take it. For the record, I think Sean Hannity makes blowhards like O'Reilly and Maddow look like Walter Cronkite. He is an ignorant, petty braggart who has willfully mislead the public his entire career. That people are up-voting garbage from his personal website here offends me to my very core.", '>>{BlueDogDem62} : Hannity is an ass and he should do it. I dislike all talking heads. They do more harm than good. I happen to agree with Hannity on this, waterboarding is not torture.', ">>{likeafox} : I respect that you have an opinion colored by your own experience, but there are some pretty high profile veterans that disagree: McCain and Jesse Ventura for a start. And I don't think a semantic argument about whether it qualifies as torture is the only part of the equation. For one thing, there are a number of experts who argue that it's [not effective](http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/an_fbi_interrogator_on_the_effectiveness_of_torture/). And mainly, shouldn't we hold ourselves to a higher standard? If we're willing to push the limits of humane treatment for POW's and detainees, why should any entity ever adhere to the Geneva Conventions or general humane conduct during times of conflict? [A number of Vietnam and CIA veterans](http://www.govexec.com/defense/2005/11/cia-veterans-speak-out-against-torture/20683/) have made strong arguments from this perspective. That the chickenhawk Sean Hannity was one of the most prominent defenders of waterboarding during that entire fiasco has informed my opinion of those who defend the practice: they're less concerned with the moral and practical matter at hand, and more concerned with making sure that American looks 'tough'.", ">>{gonzone} : Sure you have. Pictures or it didn't happen."]]

classify and reply

['>>{darwinreyna} : Yes, Hillary Clinton just exploited the murder of a British pol', ">>{Uncle_Tom1} : HRC will literally say anything to get a vote. This shouldn't be surprising.", ">>{free_libre} : Another broken campaign promise. H1-Bs clearly take good jobs from skilled and even unskilled Americans. Trump voters were counting on him to reign in the program. Of course, he'll do the opposite, because it benefits his corporate campaign donors, who don't give a shit about the American working class.", '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : Voting for stability over chaos and uncertainty is a good idea, yes.', '>>{njmaverick} : Yes BREXIT demonstrated that radical change for the sake of change can be very very dangerous.', ">>{mad_poet_navarth} : This guy's a conservative but please Bernie bros read it.", '>>{suseu} : But she did. No surprise there. Politics.', '>>{Osteomata} : A politician makes a comment on an international news story. Gotta be kidding or willfully distortive with this hillary-monstrousness crap.', '>>{warmonger561} : Stable corruption and decline. Shipping millions of jobs overseas dumping wages by importing cheap foreign labor.', '>>{FabulousDT} : Are the moderators in this forum just as intolerant as those the rioters that set things on fire at Milos college gig?', ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : I do want it to be reigned in, but I do think there is a larger overall problem with Americans being under-skilled and under-educated. For example, with technical jobs, the number one thing I hear is that they're always short of people, but very few people they interview can pass the technical part of the interview. Reign HB-1 in and put more infrastructure spending into making job training more readily available. But if you just nuke HB-1 without the latter, American companies might not have enough quality workers to be competitive.", '>>{FuckBezosOnAmazon} : Not all of them at least. Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5ruc4q/comment/dda9ejt?st=IYQ8IQFX&sh=49345ec9', '>>{ThisMachineKILLS} : > Cox’s life was cut short, Clinton declared, “by a violent act of political intolerance.” And she called on the United States and Britain to “stand together .\u2009.\u2009. by rejecting bigotry in all its forms.” Wow...how awful of her to say...', '>>{Walkitback} : How to not "politicize" a political assassination by a right-wing nut job? She\'s just speaking to the facts.', ">>{njmaverick} : The UK has been in the European Union since 1973. Their economy, laws and immigration are all tied to the EU. To vote to leave that union is a radical change by any reasoned definition of the word. The PM resigned as a result and both major UK parties are in turmoil and Scotland is ready to leave the UK along with Northern Ireland as a result of the vote The more appropriate question is how can you claim it's not radical.", '>>{someguyjusttrying} : Wanting to leave the EU is "bigotry"? The guy who killed her was a whacked out lunatic but painting the opposition as "bigots" because they have different opinions on the EU is fucking ridiculous globalist rhetoric.', ">>{buzzkillington99} : Wow, we can do self posts again? Yea, this sub has been a disgusting cesspool since June 2015. Do you remember all the pro-Bernie/anti-Hillary posts? Then the sub turned on a dime and it was all pro-Hillary/anti-Trump. All of a sudden the FBI primary was unwelcome! lol Now it's just anti-Trump. This sub doesn't even report on basic political news anymore, just anti-Trump trash.", '>>{chip_0} : Caveat: I can speak only for the Silicon Valley tech industry where I work. "Job training" for my field is not easy. It requires years of developing math, science, engineering and programming skills. This takes many years, and more patience and money than most americans have. Foreigners can acquire these skills with relative ease because they usually have free or cheap higher education in their countries, and they tend to be more motivated because earning in US dollars means more for them (in a practical sense) than it does to americans.', ">>{RumoredToBeGreat} : I work for a tech company and we are almost always looking for people and yes, passing the technical part of the interview is a massive hurdle. America doesn't just have an education problem. It has a lazy problem. You don't get handed a good-paying job right after you finish college. You have to work to find it and work harder to keep it.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : How is voting for Hillary Clinton a stable boot on the neck? Her positions on issues are similar enough to mine that I am confident in voting for her. Donald Trump's positions aren't even established, some of them are actual jokes by the candidate, and his rhetoric is off putting to me. Clinton or Trump are the most likely choices to be President, so I do choose someone with experience in politics over a lunatic.", '>>{reluctant_qualifier} : If you want to hire the best people in the world, you have to interview people from all over the world. Silicon Valley benefits from an influx of talented immigrants.', '>>{free_libre} : Then businesses should collaborate with technical schools and make sure the labor pool has the skills they need. It should be a cost that businesses subsidize.', ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : That's kind of impossible with the cost of education. Bill Gates made tremendous donations to education which doesn't even come close to what you're describing. Plus, don't you think it's embarrassing that countries that the US snubs have more educated workers? US can't maintain it's culture of ignorance forever and still remain competitive in the global sphere.", ">>{Sidwill} : Really, that's how you view your life? Tell me whats the most oppressive thing you are experiencing now because Clinton is going to be a continuation of the Obama admin.", '>>{workfuntimecoolcool} : I sure do love baiting, yes I do.', '>>{JaisBit} : Buddy, I was a huge Bernie supporter, but I would have been pro-jar of vomit if that was my only alternative to Donald Trump.', ">>{chaozhammer} : Bernie Bros have been shitting out articles from Breitbart and FOX all over this sub for months in an effort to attack Clinton. They're not nearly as 'socialist' as Mr. Freecollege would have you believe, and almost all of them on this site have been using GOP rhetoric and attacks from the start of the primaries.", ">>{free_libre} : It's not impossible. Why can't a company build in $10K to new hires to make sure they have the skills they need? The overhead of every employee is like $100K, they can just trim the bloat from that and redirect it.", ">>{damrider} : I saw this coming, it's an understandable shift. People will get increasingly scared.", ">>{someguyjusttrying} : Facts don't include your personal spin on an incident.", '>>{AngerMacFadden} : A good sign of her lack of sincerity. Cox deserves better than this victimizer of women using her name for political points.', '>>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : We know his stance on H2-As: [Trump Winery under fire after applying for visas seeking foreign workers](http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2016/12/23/trump-winery-under-fire-after-applying-for-visas-seeking-foreign-workers.html)', ">>{JeRouleAvecOCB} : You're on reddit, buddy. Around here, objectivity will get you killed.", ">>{downvote_breitbart} : I hope they aren't as intolerant as those trump supporters who have been burning down mosques.", ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : The employees that they pay $100k salaries to already have the degrees and qualifications. That's why they're offered those salaries in the first place. There's no reason for a business to invest a large sum of money on someone who they're not sure is going to pan out. And that's different from what you're talking about as far as education subsidy unless you're asking companies to hire unqualified people and then give them money to then learn the skills they need. Yeah, no one is going to go for that.", ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : It's a good thing you don't make policy decisions. Because I'm pretty sure competitive industries would outright leave if you tried to mandate that.", ">>{appmanga} : You can fill a technical interview with as many arcane questions and minutiae as you want. And programming an algorithm in 15 minutes doesn't mean you'll be any more capable of understanding a business process than someone who has actually coded business processes. H-1Bs main function is to hold down salaries and exclude certain types of people from these good paying jobs.", ">>{warmonger561} : It's a new approach and if I take Trump at face value well it might actual work.", ">>{Sidwill} : Fair enough. I get it it's not like your hiring him to babysit your kids or perform oral surgery on you, it's just the job of running a nation. If he turns out to be subpar no big whoop.", ">>{_JohnTheSavage_} : Nah, they're surprisingly reasonable given the astroturfed shit show they have to moderate. What they do is hard. The spoiled children resorting to violence to impose their beliefs clearly don't do hard.", '>>{free_libre} : Impose penalties that would be much worse if they do.', '>>{dfgdfgdgggg} : Actually, technical questions often cover basic principles of coding that you should have learned in school. Also, the idea is not how quickly you can solve it, but the steps in which you approach the process of solving it. The other stuff, if it is more job specific, I imagine they cover in the other rounds of interviews. And yes, H-1Bs do also function in undermining salaries.', ">>{appmanga} : They don't want to. H-1Bs are tethered to the companies that bring them in, almost to the point of being indentured servants. Americans who get fed up with low pay or lack of recognition can move on, and they do, and they get hired by the better companies. If you look at the requirements most companies have in their ads for Developers, almost no one is going to have all of those skills, and five years experience in tools and platforms that are three years old. It's bullshit. All shops are different, and there is always a learning curve. Most of these companies want cheap labor, and having it be brown faces from India leads to less scrutiny about the lack of black faces from America.", '>>{someguyjusttrying} : Painting Brexit supporters as bigots and Cox as "rejecting bigotry in all its forms" would imply that she feels opposition towards the EU is, in fact, bigotry. It doesn\'t help that the guy who killed her shouted "Britain first!" right before the act, a known Brexit phrase.', '>>{TrumpShill} : So opening up self posts is just going to give "them" a forum to whine about how unfair life is and blame the mods for it, huh? With hundreds of thousands of unique visits per day and the ability to create anonymous accounts, you should look into the phenominon of "math" and statistics to answer your question about bias.', ">>{appmanga} : Not all developers learned their craft in school. I agree, the steps taken to solve a problem tell a lot, but companies that use tools like HackerRank and other assessments expect a completed correct answer. I'm sorry, and things may be different in your part of the country (though I seriously doubt they are), but there is a dirty underbelly associated with the hiring and recruitment processes of lots of companies based in the Southeast, and it's more about keeping certain people out than finding good people to hire.", '>>{chip_0} : > H-1Bs are tethered to the companies that bring them in, almost to the point of being indentured servants. This is a baseless, yet oft propagated, myth.', ">>{njmaverick} : > waters stayed calm that's about the only thing that stayed calm", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : > while protesting a known white supremacist. Milo? How can he be a white supremacist when his partner is a minority?', '>>{ThisMachineKILLS} : Didn\'t the guy walk away yelling "Britain First" after he murdered her...?', '>>{chip_0} : But maybe if we just ignore the rest of the world and stick to our safe spaces, we can make america gr8 again?', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : At the end of the day, I don't have the privilege of being white or straight in the U.S. There are a lot of legitimate criticisms of Hillary Clinton, but she isn't the candidate pushing discriminatory policies against people like myself. If not her, then it would be Trump in the White House. It would be a Trump nominee appointed to the Supreme Court. She is the only realistic choice for people like myself.", ">>{buzzkillington99} : You can't spend 12 months screaming that Hillary's emails are disqualifying and then all of a sudden say they aren't just because you dislike her new general election opponent. If you were one of the few who weren't screaming about her emails, then that's great. I liked Hillary for the most part and never considered her emails a problem. This sub on the other hand can't say the same on the whole.", '>>{ThisMachineKILLS} : Yeah, Britain First with their "Christian patrols" and "mosque invasions," how could anyone think they\'re bigoted...', '>>{gAlienLifeform} : Well, here I am angry about the stuff that Trump explicitly says he believes about Muslims and Mexicans, but, sure, how dare she use words that imply feelings you disagree with.', '>>{chip_0} : And if the workers rebel, whip them into order.', ">>{DominarRygelThe16th} : Some witnesses say he did, some say he didn't.", '>>{gAlienLifeform} : >Wanting to leave the EU is "bigotry"? You said it, not OP', ">>{YourBlogSucksToo} : You're assuming the first part of your sentence from the second part of your sentence", '>>{free_libre} : Why would the workers rebel? This is all pro-worker.', '>>{sarge21} : Uh, you can believe that whites are better than other races while still going out with someone of another race', '>>{GonzoNation} : **???** Stating facts is a "demonstation of" what? >Cox’s life was cut short, Clinton declared, “by a violent act of political intolerance.” I don\'t get how that\'s wrong.', ">>{appmanga} : Having known more than a few H-1Bs, from India and Canada, and having read the laws concerning such individuals more than a time or two, I'll stand by my characterization.", ">>{kstinfo} : > Talking heads in the media are bemoaning the travesty British voters have brought upon their country by opting for Brexit. In a unified chorus the privilaged elite are even questioning the precepts of democracy in which 'the people' might vote against their own best interest. (They would have us believe we haven't been doing that for years.) However, they also fail to grasp that every once in while the badger gnaws off its foot to escape the trap. > Due to austerity the man-in-the-street Brit hasn't had a raise in seven years. But, like here, the fat cats have rebounded nicely - thank you very much. > Clinton isn't owned by Wall Street, the Military Industrial Complex, the global resource exploiters, the uber rich, and the uber powerful. She is a personification of those forces. Clinton is a full-fledged oligarch - and, as a consequence, feels removed from responsibility.", ">>{chip_0} : Enlighten us on these laws. As an H-1B employee I'd love to learn about why I cannot switch jobs.", '>>{GonzoNation} : ??? There are a lot of votes in the UK I bet.', '>>{ZestyOatBran} : Do you believe that any of the purported policies that Trump has not established, specifically those targeting minorities, will actually get any ground in Congress? I have my doubts.', '>>{Drathrul} : Way to have literally no conviction or insight.. Clinton and Trump are not different.', '>>{gAlienLifeform} : Oh, ffs, ["Thomas Mair gave his name as \'Death to traitors, freedom for Britain\', when he appeared at Westminster Magistrates\' Court."](http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36567005)', '>>{GonzoNation} : **???** How was "her name" used? Are we going to say that about the people killed in Orlando too? Their "names" were used? Ms. Cox and they were assassinated. It\'s not OK to object to assassination now!', ">>{zetec} : I can't tell if this is a serious question or not.", '>>{kstinfo} : > The PM resigned as a result Rather than deal with the mess he and the rest of the Brit establishment have created. The majority of voting Brits have said, "We don\'t like the choices you\'ve been offering us, so here\'s a poke in the eye." Good for them !', ">>{gAlienLifeform} : I'd be inclined to agree with that assessment, but people trying to pretend that politics had no part in it whatsoever are painfully wrong and irritatingly shameless about it ITT, IMO.", ">>{sarge21} : Maybe you could think Hillary's emails are disqualifying but then when you compare them to Trump bragging about sexual assault they don't seem so bad. People weren't happy with Hillary because she wasn't a very good candidate. When she won the primary, people supported her because she was still a far better candidate than Trump. It's really simple and I have a feeling that you're simply pretending not to understand this.", '>>{chip_0} : Glad that you acknowledge the anal origins of your previous post.', ">>{appmanga} : Glad you understand I don't give a fuck what you think, and the laws are there for you to read them if you want. You want legal advice, pay for it, or fuck off.", '>>{chip_0} : Heh, I have my own, thank you. Since you seem so eager for a legal odd job, have you considered getting a law degree?', '>>{rrobe53} : “There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.” John Adams', ">>{misscee} : Here's a pro life tip from yours truly. Many folks lost some money over Brexit on this side of the pond. When those folks try to tell Americans (who don't have nice plump 401k plans) that these poor people should be very very scared of radical change, I don't think it's going to have the effect that they are hoping for. We all live with financial uncertainty and a volatile market (thanks Obama and Bush) but in any event that doesn't impact the people who don't have money to invest *one single bit*.", ">>{Sidwill} : Economically? Yes. Wealth always concentrates regardless of who is at the helm the question is would you like slow decline into feudalism with a Democrat or rapid decline with a Republican and in Trump's case severe volatility to boot. If you have kids or are planning to have them consider that because the natural response to this cycle is rebellion and though it might seem like a romantic adventure it's just strife, death and decay. Call me a pessimist but there you go.", '>>{Roseking} : Self-posts are not allowed here. It has nothing to do with the viewpoint of your specific self-post.', '>>{ACAB112233} : He wasn\'t a whacked out lunatic. He was a fascist. Why are you people so afraid to use the word "fascist"?', ">>{sarge21} : What are you trying to say? You're being intentionally unclear.", '>>{chip_0} : Yeah, they would still willingly work in the USA once it loses its competitive edge.', ">>{free_libre} : It's a total farce we would lose our competitive edge. In fact, it would make use much stronger, and would encourage other countries that shit on their workers to make pro-worker reforms as well.", ">>{AngerMacFadden} : It's funny your post implies you read mine and then you get it all wrong. Have fun trying to turn this one around on me.", '>>{appmanga} : Yeah, an H-1B lawyer. What other wonderful tales do you have for me? Goodnight and good luck.', ">>{owlpoofs} : This is why you lot need an actual education about what went down in Nazi Germany instead of whatever dogshit they're teaching you in school. There was plenty of Nazi/Jewish collaboration. Doesn't mean they weren't fucking insane racists. Racists have no concern for ideological consistency or intellectual honesty. If they were even capable of it, they probably wouldn't be racists.", '>>{oh-just-another-guy} : H-1B is easily transferable. Only a very unskilled worker would have trouble transferring the Visa. The fact that someone on an H-1B is stuck to their employer is a myth.', '>>{Sidwill} : What if the country being enslaved holds most of its own debt?http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/10/news/economy/us-debt-ownership/', '>>{warmonger561} : >slow decline into feudalism with a Democrat Fuck no', ">>{Roseking} : > Wow, we can do self posts again? No, we can't. That is why his post was removed.", ">>{rrobe53} : Well there's two avenues of thought behind that quote. The country enslaved by other nation(s), or the country enslaving itself. Your example I think more closely applies to the former. People worried about a Clinton presidency are worried about the latter.", ">>{ConceptualTrap} : I cast a ballot for candidates I believe in and agree with. At this point, it looks like that vote won't be for a Democrat or a Republican. I refuse to be blamed for the catastrophe that will certainly result from a Trump OR Clinton Presidency.", '>>{ACAB112233} : ITT: A bunch of cowards who are scared to use the word "fascist" to describe the assassin.', '>>{rahduke} : Posts are not meant to discuss politics, posts are for dissemenating information. Comment section is where you can spout off about any dumb view or opinion you hold.', '>>{njmaverick} : Sadly the average working Brit will suffer for that poke in the eye.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : > There was plenty of Nazi/Jewish collaboration You mean people like George Soros?', '>>{axelrod_squad} : Oh Christ. HILLARY WAS against gays until 2013. Donald was a supporter way before that.', '>>{axelrod_squad} : Gop rhetoric like "FBI investigation" and "slush fund charity"', ">>{misscee} : I cashed in my 401k and I'm managing it myself. After the last recession I took some time to learn about financial markets, so I didn't lose a penny either.", '>>{pinata_penis_pump2} : Her full statement makes it even worse. God that woman is human garbage.', ">>{kstinfo} : Most probably many of us might suffer if Trump becomes president, but if it stops the decline we've been experiencing for 30+ years it will be well worth it.", '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : >Here is a post I made that was deleted Self posts are prohibited and will get deleted by the mods. Other than that, yes, most of the mod team here enforces the rules according to their own whims/biases.', ">>{njmaverick} : > if it stops the decline we've been experiencing for 30+ years it will be well worth it. Only instead of stopping the decline it will accelerate it. The problem as we witnessed first hand with the BREXIT vote is that change can be for the worse, rather than for the better.", '>>{wittyname83} : Those vast, right-wing conspirators like the FBI and Associated Press.', '>>{KindaStillDrunk} : And shooitng up mosques and malls and churches and schools and abortion clinics. We really should consider deporting these dangerous white Christian males that are terrorizing our country and trying to impose Christian Sharia law.', '>>{buzzkillington99} : I understand it just fine, but I don\'t think you understand my point. The point is that you don\'t overplay your hand, because then you will have your ass handed to you later. Argue that you prefer Bernie all day long, but don\'t overplay the email issue. For all the post-election talk of the DNC leaks, that was a minor distraction that was hardly reported. Most of the damage to Hillary during the general campaign was based around her emails. "Lock Her Up" wasn\'t based on stuff in the DNC hacks lol This sub is continuing with the same problem. They are trying to make a major issue out of minor things all day every day. You couldn\'t remember all of the so-called Trump scandals since Nov 8 that have been posted on this sub if you tried.', ">>{mad_poet_navarth} : Personally I wouldn't attribute what they're doing as being unprincipled as much as as it is shooting themselves in the foot. Clinton is far and away a better presidential choice for a leftie, but BECAUSE she's a neo-liberal, they use the Right's Clinton talking points to shoot her down.", '>>{GonzoNation} : So we don\'t know whether an insane person was intolerant and Mrs. Clinton stands to pick up votes in the UK? >Cox’s life was cut short, Clinton declared, “by a violent act of political intolerance.” Why is that wrong again? I\'m sure the insane person in the UK was much more "tolerant"t than the insane shooter in Orlando who used to frequent the club he shot up? Trump is sure that we can stop people like him by banning guns and declaring war on all Muslims.', '>>{GonzoNation} : No doubt Murdoch would consider that a random utterance.', '>>{DrChairmanMeow} : Bro......I lived in west oakland (essentially 10 ft from Berkeley) and that story is really, really misconstrued. Just so you know anarchist gangs wearing all black do not represent UC Berkeley or its students. The college and its students invited him there to speak and some douchebags took advantage of the distraction created by protests to break shit. It happens all the time during protests and just because it was a slow news day people took notice.', '>>{Hurrah_for_Karamazov} : Isn\'t a pro life tip a bit different than a life pro tip? Heh, as a Catholic, I was like, "Oh, what\'s the tip!"', '>>{Okrigar} : You can hardly post that as proof when the entire contents were deleted, as far as we know you might of insulted people left and right in edits on the OP', ">>{kstinfo} : If we continue on the same path - steadily increasing wealth disparity, failure to address climate change, and a foreign policy that spawns terrorism - we end up as either a third world country or we have riots in the streets - or both. Neither we nor the Brits have been offered honest 'better'. Lots of lip service and promises, but in actuality a lot of not-quite-as-bad. It's not just the money, it's that these elites have made pretty catastrophic mistakes - Iraq and the bank collapse to name two.", ">>{GonzoNation} : Murdoch, Karl Rove's employer. He should make a mint off of interviews of Trump in the future.", '>>{ja734} : she deserves better than her name being used to support the things she supported while she was alive? Im pretty sure thats what she would want actually.', ">>{JaisBit} : Well, I wasn't a big fan of hers, but I wasn't screaming about her emails. I was more concerned with her hawkishness, her paid speaking engagements to big financial institutions, and her general coziness with big business interests. But I wasn't worried that she was going to make a mockery of our Constitution, and undo every good thing that Obama accomplished. I can't speak for the rest of this sub, but I suspect that much of the vitriol being spewed towards Hillary Clinton during the primary was a venting of frustrations. People felt energized by Bernie Sanders, and saw a real opportunity for a cleansing of corruption in Washington, and Hillary was the person standing in the way of that. There were moments when I got caught up in that fervor, but I think it was less about some hatred for Hillary, and more about wanting to see real change brought about in our government. Passion tends to provoke hyperbole.", '>>{GonzoNation} : >It\'s funny your post implies you read mine And I did. Why is the word "your" in the above post? I read it. >and then you get it all wrong. The post I responded to has the following: > this victimizer of women **using her name** So I asked: How was "her name" used? Don\'t use "you" and a negative (e.g. "got it all wrong") Thanks.', '>>{Psy1} : How? The USA is not in the EU and nobody is panicking that Obama is not doing everything in his power to get in the EU, so why is the UK leaving the EU dangerous?', '>>{owlpoofs} : ..... Yes. I am sure George Soros was hanging out with Himmler and Goebbels in 1939.', ">>{downvote_breitbart} : don't forget about walking into churches and killing people who are praying because they happened to be black.", '>>{njmaverick} : > so why is the UK leaving the EU dangerous? One only needs to witness the fallout from the vote to know the answer to that question', ">>{Fuck_Steve_Bannon} : I want to be a dick. No, you can't be dick. YOU'RE INTOLERANT. They fail to see the logic i guess.", '>>{GoofballCircusFreak} : US politicians have an obsession with exploiting death for political gain. Shell casings were still falling to the floor in Orlando when both Hillary and Obama started milking the political teet with all the ferocity of a 14 year old boy with a Swank magazine.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : I see, you have no answer so now you are an english professor. Cheers.', '>>{Psy1} : And one just has to look at the Greek economy to see the danger of the UK staying.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : Cox was a fine lady and an expert in international relations. Clinton is incompetent and corrupt. Can it get any simpler?', ">>{Sidwill} : What you fail to acknowledge is that there are economic realities that are pulling us inexorably into that direction regardless of who's in power. Protectionism as proposes by Trump and Bernie will only make things worse as prices for consumer goods skyrocket and our quality of life suffers for it.", ">>{owlpoofs} : Looks like you're ban evading, 15 minutes old account", '>>{njmaverick} : How is pointing out parallels to Brexit a "strawman" exactly? A strawman is where you misrepresent a person\'s argument in order to create an easy target to attack and tear down. In this case I am not even claiming a debate opponent much less misrepresenting a position', '>>{GonzoNation} : > US politicians have an obsession with exploiting death for political gain. But when they\'re in the UK? Does that mean this is some tradition that we picked up from their Globe Theater? Shakespeare? > "*I come to bury Caeser, not to praise him...*"', '>>{GonzoNation} : > I see, you have no answer I gave the exactly correct answer. Was an incorrect one desired?', '>>{njmaverick} : The UK is on the verge of bankruptcy? Perhaps you should look at the thriving German economy instead.', ">>{Sidwill} : But we have a built in fix for our greatest debt holder (ourselves) and that's progressive taxation applied at a rate that redistributes wealth in a way that builds infrastructure and opportunity for all. We don't have to become protectionists, we just need to realize the solution to much of our problems lies in applying our tax code in the way it was intended.", '>>{ModsNPolitcsRSnoflks} : I could believe that except for the fact that the campus security and democrat mayor did nothing.', '>>{Psy1} : The EU response to the Greek economic crisis showed that it will make economic crises far worse rather then help.', ">>{UWantWhatUGet} : Brexit was not 'for the sake of change' nor was it 'very very dangerous.'", '>>{njmaverick} : I would accept that it was a successful vote that rode on the coat tails of bigotry and racism. As for very dangerous they say people put their money where their mouth is and the record low levels for the Pound and the stock market crashes say it all.', '>>{ja734} : lol yeah shes so incompetent that shes going to cruise into the white house in the biggest landslide since 84.', ">>{deathcloc_politics} : It's not, people hate Clinton because they are told to and no one ever reads past the headlines or from sources with opposing ideology to their own", '>>{Mallardy} : How could Strom Thurmond be racist if he had a child with a black woman? Apparently, the answer is "pretty easily".', '>>{GoofballCircusFreak} : I\'d quote Sophocles to zing you back, but I don\'t know who that is. Hillary could have done a boilerplate, "Thoughts and prayers, bugabugabuga." but instead did, "Hey everyone, look at meeeeeeeee!"', ">>{rrobe53} : This point in the conversation seems like the precipice before we fall into a completely different argument. [And here we go...](http://i.imgur.com/30eEul4.gif) The slavers, as you will, would be the 1%, Wall Street and those peddling a global economy as a gainful opportunity to all. Yeah, the economy may be better under globalist policies but who really benefits from that? [This expiriment with monkeys](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL45pVdsRvE) in which they exchanged a task for food I think demonstrates how some Americans feel. Fairness, or the appearance of such trumps all else. Let's be honest, most of us have great opportunity and privilege. You seem to agree on the fundamental problem with some of the 1% soaking up increases in productivity while the middle class declines, so I won't dive further into it. There's a quip talking about how great the economy is under Obama. He's created so many jobs for America that I've got three of them. Good joke. Everybody laugh. Roll on snare drum. Curtains. Unfortunately, it's how a lot of Americans feel. Clinton offers to continue these policies, and while she plays lip service to the plight of the lamb she herself is among the wolves. So, what then? I don't think there is a good choice. I'm more discontented by the corruption of my team than that of an adversary, and as such I see giving Clinton the nod as a worse move than Trump. I've seen her ways, and I don't want to continue to see them, so if the options are continue those or defeat, I will take the defeat. I'd rather the Democrat party lose every elected position than to reaffirm that I stand for what they seem to.", ">>{DominarRygelThe16th} : That doesn't change the fact that there are conflicting witness statements. I'm not claiming to support either side, I'm just pointing out what's been reported.", ">>{UWantWhatUGet} : > I would accept... Irrelevant > the **record low levels** for the Pound *and* the stock market *crashes* say it all. Maybe, but that is bullshit, just like the bigotry/racism claims. [Interesting](http://i.imgur.com/gbs2P9p.png) [Is finance your specialty?](http://i.imgur.com/JJjB0U5.png) [Is history your specialty?](http://i.imgur.com/l1uj03b.png) Look, I realize all that the left/globalists have going for them is this specter of racism from the right to scare the unwitting emotional masses to their side and that the Brexit success is both a bitch slap extraordinaire to the left/globalists and an opportunity to try to unleash the mediums to stir more specters of racism. Scotland refused to take her sovereignty two years ago and now look where she is, a pathetic co-dependent who gave herself to the very people that would keep her from getting what she actually wanted. She tried to use the UK to keep with the EU and the UK kicked her to the curb - that's what you get for surrendering your sovereignty. That is the lesson to be learned - globalist would-be whores take note.", ">>{Sidwill} : This discussion brings me back to my previous point which is tax policy has the ability to be the great leveler. Any leader who preaches protectionism is having you trade a shitty job for a job that's less shitty but results in less buying power. The globalism trend is inevitable it cannot be stopped because communication, automation and transportation has shrunk our world and will continue to do so. So the solution to income inequities in our society lays right under our noses, taxation of the haves at levels that can be reinvested in infrastructure, education , retooling our energy grids this is what we should be looking to do and despite Clinton's real and perceived issues she is on the right side of this. I love Bernie, he speaks to what I feel but we don't get to choose him this time.", '>>{gAlienLifeform} : Well, I hate Clinton for good reason I think (because she participated in the US fucking of Honduras and Libya, sold fracking to the world, ran a nasty primary campaign, and took way too much money from the pharmaceutical and finance industries, to name a few things), but attacking her for her comments here is stupid, and all the defensive projecting Brexit supporters trying to pretend bigotry and xenophobia out of existence are way more loathsome for me.', ">>{rrobe53} : I'm not in disagreement with you on policy, but I am about Clinton.", ">>{RidleyScotch} : > Shell casings were still falling to the floor in Orlando when both Hillary and Obama started milking the political teet with all the ferocity of a 14 year old boy with a Swank magazine. Ooh that's completely false. Omar Mateen was dead by 6am. The first tweet or mention or Orlando [Hillary Clinton was at](https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/741983463721553920) 9:20 AM Obama never tweeted anything on the day of and [gave remarks at 1:59pm](https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/12/remarks-president-mass-shooting-orlando) So unless bullet casings just levitated above the ground for like 5 hours until Hillary and Obama could make their statements you just completely made up some bullshit, buddy.", '>>{njmaverick} : > Maybe, but that is bullshit, just like the bigotry/racism claims. The facts seem to strongly dispute your assertion.', ">>{VioletBeauregard} : Wow, OP is really working hard to bait the mods. I've never seen such skill. Such mastery. He's a true intellectual master baiter.", '>>{DrChairmanMeow} : Well I dont know when the last time you attended college but campus security usually cannot just shoot people....plus when theres hundreds of people in a crowd it can be difficult to just pick and choose whos being peaceful and who is being violent. They did end up dispersing the crowd. Also Berkeley is a city of over 100k....what does the mayor have to do with a college campus protest? Im sure the mayor has better things to do at 9pm, like manage a large urban population? I guess by your rationale the mayor political party ensures that they want lawlessness and anarchy though....like wtf?', ">>{Sidwill} : Let me ask you this, what is the difference between Obama or Bill and Clinton? I see zero difference from a practical standpoint it's more personality and perception. We have seen a long drawn out effort starting right after the 2012 election to knock down her numbers starting with switching blame for Benghazi from Obama to her a ploy so obvious as to be described as infantile . The Benghazi fishing expedition begat emailgate and with each released email a story is born and an article written, a nebulous story that has no payoff in actual criminal wrongdoing but a story nonetheless. Then you have the regurgitated ramblings of the right from the 90's getting play as well. I could go on, but my point is Clinton is just a run of the mill Democrat not some super criminal bent on world destruction like so many posters seem to feel.", '>>{truthhurts4444} : Fascist is so overused these days. A fascist is basically anyone who disagrees with anyone else', '>>{rrobe53} : If you strip the person and look at their ideals, Hillary definitely falls closer to where I would typically vote on the spectrum. I don\'t consider Bill a great president, and consider him to have benefited greatly from the tech bubble all while playing a significant hand in the recession. Obama I don\'t think has been great, but not bad either, which is something that facing our current choices is appreciated. He\'s disappointed me a few times, and his stance on TPP is not something I enjoy. His pivot from Candidate Obama to President Obama is his biggest drawback in my eyes, and I think Hillary will repeat this. Hillary, as Obama said, will say anything she has to. Even in this election, devoid of the past 20 years of her public service, we see examples of her willingness to change her message depending on who she\'s speaking to. *Truly* evolving is one thing, her pandering is just plain lying. I don\'t trust her to do anything she says. Some of her ideas I feel she\'s pulled up too soon on, some I agree with, and some I\'m completely against. That\'s anyone though, including Sanders and Trump, so the difference comes down to what I believe they will truly deliver on and what I believe their true motives to be. Benghazi is a thing, whether the left likes it or not. Did she kill those people? No, but her character was in demonstration, as was the Republicans. They attempted to lay the dead Americans at her feet which isn\'t a good look, but I don\'t very much like her trying to blame the attack on a video while calling it something else in emails. Further, as someone who is both an IT professional and works in a cleared environment, "email-gate" is far from a non-story. I have absolutely no doubt that there was criminal wrongdoing, it\'s a matter of who did it and if they can prove it. The server itself is nothing, a slap on the wrist offense, in addition to the other shady shit that isn\'t technically illegal. The classified material on the server though... That was illegally stored, retained and not returned. That\'s where the fuck up transitions into a criminal fuck up. Regardless of that, is she a criminal bent on world destruction? No. I think very rarely is someone a villain in their own story. If Hillary is what is considered a run of the mill Democrat then my reaction is to dislike all Democrats, not to like her.', ">>{GonzoNation} : > I'd quote Sophocles to zing you back, but I don't know who that is. Cute. Not British. He wrote Oedipus Rex though.", ">>{owlpoofs} : I bet you're the one behind that TuLegit2Quit account as well. Get a job.", ">>{nashgasm} : right right, what exactly did this racist, 'alt right' mouthpiece get completely banned from twitter for? oh thats right, making ape jokes.", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : Nah, just helping them steal for the soon to be terminated Jews.', ">>{GoofballCircusFreak} : Hyperbole is apparently just a planet that shares the same solar system as the terror planet Hyperion. I'll make a note of that and try to be as literal as the Direct TV guide that runs on a continuous loop on my television since the day my wife ate the remote (I spilled chocolate on it).", ">>{gAlienLifeform} : OK, fair is fair, tho if we're going to be technical I think what I saw was that some witnesses said he said that and others weren't sure/able to here what he said, but you're right there was some confusion yesterday.", '>>{UWantWhatUGet} : I suppose if 17,000,000 people are bigots and racists, then maybe the nation should reflect that in their immigration policy. You can see from the exit polls that areas where people are transient, London and some of the university towns, Brexit was not in favor, but in the areas where families live and there are many refugees, the Brexit was in favor. Now the UK has control over its own destiny w/r/t refugees and more importantly economic migrants - good for them. It takes generations to build a good community, to have that wantonly despoiled by bureaucrats that you have no control over is the antithesis of democracy. College kids do not understand this. There is no special place in heaven for people that subject themselves to economic migrants or worse, illegals.', '>>{RidleyScotch} : Ah so going to play the hyperbole shtick, is that it and deflect any real discussion or criticism because you know you are wrong? If your answers and responses to the following comment is just hyperbole built upon falsities then you are just proving your own ignorance. > So we don\'t know whether an insane person was intolerant and Mrs. Clinton stands to pick up votes in the UK? > > >Cox’s life was cut short, Clinton declared, “by a violent act of political intolerance.” > > Why is that wrong again? > > > I\'m sure the insane person in the UK was much more "tolerant"t than the insane shooter in Orlando who used to frequent the club he shot up? > > Trump is sure that we can stop people like him by banning guns and declaring war on all Muslims. > ...At least some people have the intelligence to root their hyperbole in truth, whereas you just completely lied and made shit up for something that is easily rebuffed. >Hillary could have done a boilerplate, "Thoughts and prayers, bugabugabuga." but instead did, "Hey everyone, look at meeeeeeeee!" And I suppose this is hyperbole too since it\'s clear as day she did the generic thoughts and prayers stuff or is using "I"-statements too much for you to handle? No reason to waste anymore time on a moron like you.', ">>{GoofballCircusFreak} : You got me, I actually don't know what hyperbole is and I truly did believe that shell casing levitate for up to 24 hours (a quick googlie search that my wife just showed me how to do has proven me wrong!) Left to my own devices, I'd walk of the cliff of intellectualism. That is why need this circus clown riot of sub.", '>>{njmaverick} : > Now the UK has control over its own destiny w/r/t refugees and more importantly economic migrants - good for them. From what I understand that statement is not entirely accurate as the UK will need to give on this issue if they wish to trade with the EU.', '>>{ShinyCoin} : That incompetent Clinton is about to be the next President of the United States. Might want to rethink the definition you have for incompetence.', '>>{ShinyCoin} : Once she becomes queen in the US. She can claim the British throne as well.', '>>{UWantWhatUGet} : Then they still have control. I hope the UK sticks to its beliefs and does not fold to the coercion of the globalists. If they can hold out and refuse the blackmail, then others will surely follow, as clearly there is no evidence of the benefits of forced immigration.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Uh...when? In 2000, sure. Then, in typical Trump fashion, his position takes a total 180. In 2011, long before he was running his campaign, he did say that LGBT married couples should not receive the same rights as married heterosexual couples. Let's not even get started on what his SCOTUS nominees mean for the future of LGBT rights. He is no supporter of LGBT rights and you are deluding yourself if you think otherwise.", ">>{Tasty_Yams} : People might start making a connection between the white-power anti-immigrant, fascists rising in Europe, and a certain kindred spirit in American politics, who's running for president.", '>>{BlueDogDem62} : She is the political equivalent of a tire fire.', ">>{DocGonzo13} : I think it's being erroneously attributed to violent nationalist rhetoric though that is often used by facists.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I'm not saying that the votes of white people do not count. I am saying that when you have these nationalists campaigns (such as Brexit) succeed, a wave of anti-immigrant sentiment follow. I don't know if you know this but there is a lot of racial incidents going on in the UK right now, including the bombing of a Halal shop. 52% of the country voted to Leave, so all the racists started becoming open about their racism. Whether it's assaulting cars of foreigners, or sending them letters calling them vermin, or blowing up their stories, it is absolutely not in my interest.", '>>{Tasty_Yams} : Omar Marteen = Radical Islamic extremist Thomas Mair = ~~Radical right wing extremist~~ mentally insane', '>>{tjblue} : That she thought the murder was a bad thing?', ">>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : I honestly can't tell if this is a joke response or a serious response", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Is that a reason why I should vote for him? No. His positions are not similar to mine at all. They are closer to Clinton's.", '>>{ZestyOatBran} : I was not suggesting that you do, or that you should vote for him. Just attempting to show some reasoning why one should not be too afraid of either of these options. The world will not end with a Trump presidency or the Clinton presidency, despite what the media and reddit would have you believe.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : It isn't going to be the end of the world. That's obvious. But he is a candidate whose campaign is built by xenophobia and nationalism. Just look at the UK. Leave won, and following that all the racists felt empowered, that somehow 52% of the country had felt the same things they did. They started sending letters to immigrant families calling them vermin, putting graffiti on buildings of immigrant organizations that told them to go home, and literally bombed a Halal butcher's shop."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{FabulousDT} : Are the moderators in this forum just as intolerant as those the rioters that set things on fire at Milos college gig?', '>>{FuckBezosOnAmazon} : Not all of them at least. Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5ruc4q/comment/dda9ejt?st=IYQ8IQFX&sh=49345ec9', ">>{buzzkillington99} : Wow, we can do self posts again? Yea, this sub has been a disgusting cesspool since June 2015. Do you remember all the pro-Bernie/anti-Hillary posts? Then the sub turned on a dime and it was all pro-Hillary/anti-Trump. All of a sudden the FBI primary was unwelcome! lol Now it's just anti-Trump. This sub doesn't even report on basic political news anymore, just anti-Trump trash.", '>>{workfuntimecoolcool} : I sure do love baiting, yes I do.', '>>{JaisBit} : Buddy, I was a huge Bernie supporter, but I would have been pro-jar of vomit if that was my only alternative to Donald Trump.', ">>{downvote_breitbart} : I hope they aren't as intolerant as those trump supporters who have been burning down mosques.", ">>{_JohnTheSavage_} : Nah, they're surprisingly reasonable given the astroturfed shit show they have to moderate. What they do is hard. The spoiled children resorting to violence to impose their beliefs clearly don't do hard.", '>>{TrumpShill} : So opening up self posts is just going to give "them" a forum to whine about how unfair life is and blame the mods for it, huh? With hundreds of thousands of unique visits per day and the ability to create anonymous accounts, you should look into the phenominon of "math" and statistics to answer your question about bias.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : > while protesting a known white supremacist. Milo? How can he be a white supremacist when his partner is a minority?', ">>{buzzkillington99} : You can't spend 12 months screaming that Hillary's emails are disqualifying and then all of a sudden say they aren't just because you dislike her new general election opponent. If you were one of the few who weren't screaming about her emails, then that's great. I liked Hillary for the most part and never considered her emails a problem. This sub on the other hand can't say the same on the whole.", '>>{sarge21} : Uh, you can believe that whites are better than other races while still going out with someone of another race', ">>{zetec} : I can't tell if this is a serious question or not.", ">>{sarge21} : Maybe you could think Hillary's emails are disqualifying but then when you compare them to Trump bragging about sexual assault they don't seem so bad. People weren't happy with Hillary because she wasn't a very good candidate. When she won the primary, people supported her because she was still a far better candidate than Trump. It's really simple and I have a feeling that you're simply pretending not to understand this.", '>>{Roseking} : Self-posts are not allowed here. It has nothing to do with the viewpoint of your specific self-post.', ">>{sarge21} : What are you trying to say? You're being intentionally unclear.", ">>{owlpoofs} : This is why you lot need an actual education about what went down in Nazi Germany instead of whatever dogshit they're teaching you in school. There was plenty of Nazi/Jewish collaboration. Doesn't mean they weren't fucking insane racists. Racists have no concern for ideological consistency or intellectual honesty. If they were even capable of it, they probably wouldn't be racists.", ">>{Roseking} : > Wow, we can do self posts again? No, we can't. That is why his post was removed.", '>>{rahduke} : Posts are not meant to discuss politics, posts are for dissemenating information. Comment section is where you can spout off about any dumb view or opinion you hold.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : > There was plenty of Nazi/Jewish collaboration You mean people like George Soros?', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : >Here is a post I made that was deleted Self posts are prohibited and will get deleted by the mods. Other than that, yes, most of the mod team here enforces the rules according to their own whims/biases.', '>>{KindaStillDrunk} : And shooitng up mosques and malls and churches and schools and abortion clinics. We really should consider deporting these dangerous white Christian males that are terrorizing our country and trying to impose Christian Sharia law.', '>>{buzzkillington99} : I understand it just fine, but I don\'t think you understand my point. The point is that you don\'t overplay your hand, because then you will have your ass handed to you later. Argue that you prefer Bernie all day long, but don\'t overplay the email issue. For all the post-election talk of the DNC leaks, that was a minor distraction that was hardly reported. Most of the damage to Hillary during the general campaign was based around her emails. "Lock Her Up" wasn\'t based on stuff in the DNC hacks lol This sub is continuing with the same problem. They are trying to make a major issue out of minor things all day every day. You couldn\'t remember all of the so-called Trump scandals since Nov 8 that have been posted on this sub if you tried.', '>>{DrChairmanMeow} : Bro......I lived in west oakland (essentially 10 ft from Berkeley) and that story is really, really misconstrued. Just so you know anarchist gangs wearing all black do not represent UC Berkeley or its students. The college and its students invited him there to speak and some douchebags took advantage of the distraction created by protests to break shit. It happens all the time during protests and just because it was a slow news day people took notice.', '>>{Okrigar} : You can hardly post that as proof when the entire contents were deleted, as far as we know you might of insulted people left and right in edits on the OP', ">>{JaisBit} : Well, I wasn't a big fan of hers, but I wasn't screaming about her emails. I was more concerned with her hawkishness, her paid speaking engagements to big financial institutions, and her general coziness with big business interests. But I wasn't worried that she was going to make a mockery of our Constitution, and undo every good thing that Obama accomplished. I can't speak for the rest of this sub, but I suspect that much of the vitriol being spewed towards Hillary Clinton during the primary was a venting of frustrations. People felt energized by Bernie Sanders, and saw a real opportunity for a cleansing of corruption in Washington, and Hillary was the person standing in the way of that. There were moments when I got caught up in that fervor, but I think it was less about some hatred for Hillary, and more about wanting to see real change brought about in our government. Passion tends to provoke hyperbole.", '>>{owlpoofs} : ..... Yes. I am sure George Soros was hanging out with Himmler and Goebbels in 1939.', ">>{downvote_breitbart} : don't forget about walking into churches and killing people who are praying because they happened to be black.", ">>{Fuck_Steve_Bannon} : I want to be a dick. No, you can't be dick. YOU'RE INTOLERANT. They fail to see the logic i guess.", ">>{owlpoofs} : Looks like you're ban evading, 15 minutes old account", '>>{ModsNPolitcsRSnoflks} : I could believe that except for the fact that the campus security and democrat mayor did nothing.', '>>{Mallardy} : How could Strom Thurmond be racist if he had a child with a black woman? Apparently, the answer is "pretty easily".', ">>{VioletBeauregard} : Wow, OP is really working hard to bait the mods. I've never seen such skill. Such mastery. He's a true intellectual master baiter.", '>>{DrChairmanMeow} : Well I dont know when the last time you attended college but campus security usually cannot just shoot people....plus when theres hundreds of people in a crowd it can be difficult to just pick and choose whos being peaceful and who is being violent. They did end up dispersing the crowd. Also Berkeley is a city of over 100k....what does the mayor have to do with a college campus protest? Im sure the mayor has better things to do at 9pm, like manage a large urban population? I guess by your rationale the mayor political party ensures that they want lawlessness and anarchy though....like wtf?', ">>{owlpoofs} : I bet you're the one behind that TuLegit2Quit account as well. Get a job.", ">>{nashgasm} : right right, what exactly did this racist, 'alt right' mouthpiece get completely banned from twitter for? oh thats right, making ape jokes.", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : Nah, just helping them steal for the soon to be terminated Jews.'], [">>{free_libre} : Another broken campaign promise. H1-Bs clearly take good jobs from skilled and even unskilled Americans. Trump voters were counting on him to reign in the program. Of course, he'll do the opposite, because it benefits his corporate campaign donors, who don't give a shit about the American working class.", ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : I do want it to be reigned in, but I do think there is a larger overall problem with Americans being under-skilled and under-educated. For example, with technical jobs, the number one thing I hear is that they're always short of people, but very few people they interview can pass the technical part of the interview. Reign HB-1 in and put more infrastructure spending into making job training more readily available. But if you just nuke HB-1 without the latter, American companies might not have enough quality workers to be competitive.", '>>{chip_0} : Caveat: I can speak only for the Silicon Valley tech industry where I work. "Job training" for my field is not easy. It requires years of developing math, science, engineering and programming skills. This takes many years, and more patience and money than most americans have. Foreigners can acquire these skills with relative ease because they usually have free or cheap higher education in their countries, and they tend to be more motivated because earning in US dollars means more for them (in a practical sense) than it does to americans.', ">>{RumoredToBeGreat} : I work for a tech company and we are almost always looking for people and yes, passing the technical part of the interview is a massive hurdle. America doesn't just have an education problem. It has a lazy problem. You don't get handed a good-paying job right after you finish college. You have to work to find it and work harder to keep it.", '>>{reluctant_qualifier} : If you want to hire the best people in the world, you have to interview people from all over the world. Silicon Valley benefits from an influx of talented immigrants.', '>>{free_libre} : Then businesses should collaborate with technical schools and make sure the labor pool has the skills they need. It should be a cost that businesses subsidize.', ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : That's kind of impossible with the cost of education. Bill Gates made tremendous donations to education which doesn't even come close to what you're describing. Plus, don't you think it's embarrassing that countries that the US snubs have more educated workers? US can't maintain it's culture of ignorance forever and still remain competitive in the global sphere.", ">>{free_libre} : It's not impossible. Why can't a company build in $10K to new hires to make sure they have the skills they need? The overhead of every employee is like $100K, they can just trim the bloat from that and redirect it.", '>>{HindleMcCrindleberry} : We know his stance on H2-As: [Trump Winery under fire after applying for visas seeking foreign workers](http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2016/12/23/trump-winery-under-fire-after-applying-for-visas-seeking-foreign-workers.html)', ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : The employees that they pay $100k salaries to already have the degrees and qualifications. That's why they're offered those salaries in the first place. There's no reason for a business to invest a large sum of money on someone who they're not sure is going to pan out. And that's different from what you're talking about as far as education subsidy unless you're asking companies to hire unqualified people and then give them money to then learn the skills they need. Yeah, no one is going to go for that.", ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : It's a good thing you don't make policy decisions. Because I'm pretty sure competitive industries would outright leave if you tried to mandate that.", ">>{appmanga} : You can fill a technical interview with as many arcane questions and minutiae as you want. And programming an algorithm in 15 minutes doesn't mean you'll be any more capable of understanding a business process than someone who has actually coded business processes. H-1Bs main function is to hold down salaries and exclude certain types of people from these good paying jobs.", '>>{free_libre} : Impose penalties that would be much worse if they do.', '>>{dfgdfgdgggg} : Actually, technical questions often cover basic principles of coding that you should have learned in school. Also, the idea is not how quickly you can solve it, but the steps in which you approach the process of solving it. The other stuff, if it is more job specific, I imagine they cover in the other rounds of interviews. And yes, H-1Bs do also function in undermining salaries.', ">>{appmanga} : They don't want to. H-1Bs are tethered to the companies that bring them in, almost to the point of being indentured servants. Americans who get fed up with low pay or lack of recognition can move on, and they do, and they get hired by the better companies. If you look at the requirements most companies have in their ads for Developers, almost no one is going to have all of those skills, and five years experience in tools and platforms that are three years old. It's bullshit. All shops are different, and there is always a learning curve. Most of these companies want cheap labor, and having it be brown faces from India leads to less scrutiny about the lack of black faces from America.", ">>{appmanga} : Not all developers learned their craft in school. I agree, the steps taken to solve a problem tell a lot, but companies that use tools like HackerRank and other assessments expect a completed correct answer. I'm sorry, and things may be different in your part of the country (though I seriously doubt they are), but there is a dirty underbelly associated with the hiring and recruitment processes of lots of companies based in the Southeast, and it's more about keeping certain people out than finding good people to hire.", '>>{chip_0} : > H-1Bs are tethered to the companies that bring them in, almost to the point of being indentured servants. This is a baseless, yet oft propagated, myth.', '>>{chip_0} : But maybe if we just ignore the rest of the world and stick to our safe spaces, we can make america gr8 again?', '>>{chip_0} : And if the workers rebel, whip them into order.', '>>{free_libre} : Why would the workers rebel? This is all pro-worker.', ">>{appmanga} : Having known more than a few H-1Bs, from India and Canada, and having read the laws concerning such individuals more than a time or two, I'll stand by my characterization.", ">>{chip_0} : Enlighten us on these laws. As an H-1B employee I'd love to learn about why I cannot switch jobs.", '>>{chip_0} : Glad that you acknowledge the anal origins of your previous post.', ">>{appmanga} : Glad you understand I don't give a fuck what you think, and the laws are there for you to read them if you want. You want legal advice, pay for it, or fuck off.", '>>{chip_0} : Heh, I have my own, thank you. Since you seem so eager for a legal odd job, have you considered getting a law degree?', '>>{chip_0} : Yeah, they would still willingly work in the USA once it loses its competitive edge.', ">>{free_libre} : It's a total farce we would lose our competitive edge. In fact, it would make use much stronger, and would encourage other countries that shit on their workers to make pro-worker reforms as well.", '>>{appmanga} : Yeah, an H-1B lawyer. What other wonderful tales do you have for me? Goodnight and good luck.', '>>{oh-just-another-guy} : H-1B is easily transferable. Only a very unskilled worker would have trouble transferring the Visa. The fact that someone on an H-1B is stuck to their employer is a myth.'], ['>>{radiant_snowdrop} : Voting for stability over chaos and uncertainty is a good idea, yes.', '>>{njmaverick} : Yes BREXIT demonstrated that radical change for the sake of change can be very very dangerous.', ">>{mad_poet_navarth} : This guy's a conservative but please Bernie bros read it.", '>>{warmonger561} : Stable corruption and decline. Shipping millions of jobs overseas dumping wages by importing cheap foreign labor.', ">>{njmaverick} : The UK has been in the European Union since 1973. Their economy, laws and immigration are all tied to the EU. To vote to leave that union is a radical change by any reasoned definition of the word. The PM resigned as a result and both major UK parties are in turmoil and Scotland is ready to leave the UK along with Northern Ireland as a result of the vote The more appropriate question is how can you claim it's not radical.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : How is voting for Hillary Clinton a stable boot on the neck? Her positions on issues are similar enough to mine that I am confident in voting for her. Donald Trump's positions aren't even established, some of them are actual jokes by the candidate, and his rhetoric is off putting to me. Clinton or Trump are the most likely choices to be President, so I do choose someone with experience in politics over a lunatic.", ">>{Sidwill} : Really, that's how you view your life? Tell me whats the most oppressive thing you are experiencing now because Clinton is going to be a continuation of the Obama admin.", ">>{chaozhammer} : Bernie Bros have been shitting out articles from Breitbart and FOX all over this sub for months in an effort to attack Clinton. They're not nearly as 'socialist' as Mr. Freecollege would have you believe, and almost all of them on this site have been using GOP rhetoric and attacks from the start of the primaries.", ">>{damrider} : I saw this coming, it's an understandable shift. People will get increasingly scared.", ">>{warmonger561} : It's a new approach and if I take Trump at face value well it might actual work.", ">>{Sidwill} : Fair enough. I get it it's not like your hiring him to babysit your kids or perform oral surgery on you, it's just the job of running a nation. If he turns out to be subpar no big whoop.", ">>{njmaverick} : > waters stayed calm that's about the only thing that stayed calm", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : At the end of the day, I don't have the privilege of being white or straight in the U.S. There are a lot of legitimate criticisms of Hillary Clinton, but she isn't the candidate pushing discriminatory policies against people like myself. If not her, then it would be Trump in the White House. It would be a Trump nominee appointed to the Supreme Court. She is the only realistic choice for people like myself.", ">>{kstinfo} : > Talking heads in the media are bemoaning the travesty British voters have brought upon their country by opting for Brexit. In a unified chorus the privilaged elite are even questioning the precepts of democracy in which 'the people' might vote against their own best interest. (They would have us believe we haven't been doing that for years.) However, they also fail to grasp that every once in while the badger gnaws off its foot to escape the trap. > Due to austerity the man-in-the-street Brit hasn't had a raise in seven years. But, like here, the fat cats have rebounded nicely - thank you very much. > Clinton isn't owned by Wall Street, the Military Industrial Complex, the global resource exploiters, the uber rich, and the uber powerful. She is a personification of those forces. Clinton is a full-fledged oligarch - and, as a consequence, feels removed from responsibility.", '>>{ZestyOatBran} : Do you believe that any of the purported policies that Trump has not established, specifically those targeting minorities, will actually get any ground in Congress? I have my doubts.', '>>{Drathrul} : Way to have literally no conviction or insight.. Clinton and Trump are not different.', '>>{kstinfo} : > The PM resigned as a result Rather than deal with the mess he and the rest of the Brit establishment have created. The majority of voting Brits have said, "We don\'t like the choices you\'ve been offering us, so here\'s a poke in the eye." Good for them !', '>>{rrobe53} : “There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.” John Adams', ">>{misscee} : Here's a pro life tip from yours truly. Many folks lost some money over Brexit on this side of the pond. When those folks try to tell Americans (who don't have nice plump 401k plans) that these poor people should be very very scared of radical change, I don't think it's going to have the effect that they are hoping for. We all live with financial uncertainty and a volatile market (thanks Obama and Bush) but in any event that doesn't impact the people who don't have money to invest *one single bit*.", ">>{Sidwill} : Economically? Yes. Wealth always concentrates regardless of who is at the helm the question is would you like slow decline into feudalism with a Democrat or rapid decline with a Republican and in Trump's case severe volatility to boot. If you have kids or are planning to have them consider that because the natural response to this cycle is rebellion and though it might seem like a romantic adventure it's just strife, death and decay. Call me a pessimist but there you go.", '>>{Sidwill} : What if the country being enslaved holds most of its own debt?http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/10/news/economy/us-debt-ownership/', '>>{warmonger561} : >slow decline into feudalism with a Democrat Fuck no', ">>{rrobe53} : Well there's two avenues of thought behind that quote. The country enslaved by other nation(s), or the country enslaving itself. Your example I think more closely applies to the former. People worried about a Clinton presidency are worried about the latter.", ">>{ConceptualTrap} : I cast a ballot for candidates I believe in and agree with. At this point, it looks like that vote won't be for a Democrat or a Republican. I refuse to be blamed for the catastrophe that will certainly result from a Trump OR Clinton Presidency.", '>>{njmaverick} : Sadly the average working Brit will suffer for that poke in the eye.', '>>{axelrod_squad} : Oh Christ. HILLARY WAS against gays until 2013. Donald was a supporter way before that.', '>>{axelrod_squad} : Gop rhetoric like "FBI investigation" and "slush fund charity"', ">>{misscee} : I cashed in my 401k and I'm managing it myself. After the last recession I took some time to learn about financial markets, so I didn't lose a penny either.", ">>{kstinfo} : Most probably many of us might suffer if Trump becomes president, but if it stops the decline we've been experiencing for 30+ years it will be well worth it.", ">>{njmaverick} : > if it stops the decline we've been experiencing for 30+ years it will be well worth it. Only instead of stopping the decline it will accelerate it. The problem as we witnessed first hand with the BREXIT vote is that change can be for the worse, rather than for the better.", '>>{wittyname83} : Those vast, right-wing conspirators like the FBI and Associated Press.', ">>{mad_poet_navarth} : Personally I wouldn't attribute what they're doing as being unprincipled as much as as it is shooting themselves in the foot. Clinton is far and away a better presidential choice for a leftie, but BECAUSE she's a neo-liberal, they use the Right's Clinton talking points to shoot her down.", '>>{Hurrah_for_Karamazov} : Isn\'t a pro life tip a bit different than a life pro tip? Heh, as a Catholic, I was like, "Oh, what\'s the tip!"', ">>{kstinfo} : If we continue on the same path - steadily increasing wealth disparity, failure to address climate change, and a foreign policy that spawns terrorism - we end up as either a third world country or we have riots in the streets - or both. Neither we nor the Brits have been offered honest 'better'. Lots of lip service and promises, but in actuality a lot of not-quite-as-bad. It's not just the money, it's that these elites have made pretty catastrophic mistakes - Iraq and the bank collapse to name two.", '>>{Psy1} : How? The USA is not in the EU and nobody is panicking that Obama is not doing everything in his power to get in the EU, so why is the UK leaving the EU dangerous?', '>>{njmaverick} : > so why is the UK leaving the EU dangerous? One only needs to witness the fallout from the vote to know the answer to that question', '>>{Psy1} : And one just has to look at the Greek economy to see the danger of the UK staying.', ">>{Sidwill} : What you fail to acknowledge is that there are economic realities that are pulling us inexorably into that direction regardless of who's in power. Protectionism as proposes by Trump and Bernie will only make things worse as prices for consumer goods skyrocket and our quality of life suffers for it.", '>>{njmaverick} : How is pointing out parallels to Brexit a "strawman" exactly? A strawman is where you misrepresent a person\'s argument in order to create an easy target to attack and tear down. In this case I am not even claiming a debate opponent much less misrepresenting a position', '>>{njmaverick} : The UK is on the verge of bankruptcy? Perhaps you should look at the thriving German economy instead.', ">>{Sidwill} : But we have a built in fix for our greatest debt holder (ourselves) and that's progressive taxation applied at a rate that redistributes wealth in a way that builds infrastructure and opportunity for all. We don't have to become protectionists, we just need to realize the solution to much of our problems lies in applying our tax code in the way it was intended.", '>>{Psy1} : The EU response to the Greek economic crisis showed that it will make economic crises far worse rather then help.', ">>{UWantWhatUGet} : Brexit was not 'for the sake of change' nor was it 'very very dangerous.'", '>>{njmaverick} : I would accept that it was a successful vote that rode on the coat tails of bigotry and racism. As for very dangerous they say people put their money where their mouth is and the record low levels for the Pound and the stock market crashes say it all.', ">>{rrobe53} : This point in the conversation seems like the precipice before we fall into a completely different argument. [And here we go...](http://i.imgur.com/30eEul4.gif) The slavers, as you will, would be the 1%, Wall Street and those peddling a global economy as a gainful opportunity to all. Yeah, the economy may be better under globalist policies but who really benefits from that? [This expiriment with monkeys](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL45pVdsRvE) in which they exchanged a task for food I think demonstrates how some Americans feel. Fairness, or the appearance of such trumps all else. Let's be honest, most of us have great opportunity and privilege. You seem to agree on the fundamental problem with some of the 1% soaking up increases in productivity while the middle class declines, so I won't dive further into it. There's a quip talking about how great the economy is under Obama. He's created so many jobs for America that I've got three of them. Good joke. Everybody laugh. Roll on snare drum. Curtains. Unfortunately, it's how a lot of Americans feel. Clinton offers to continue these policies, and while she plays lip service to the plight of the lamb she herself is among the wolves. So, what then? I don't think there is a good choice. I'm more discontented by the corruption of my team than that of an adversary, and as such I see giving Clinton the nod as a worse move than Trump. I've seen her ways, and I don't want to continue to see them, so if the options are continue those or defeat, I will take the defeat. I'd rather the Democrat party lose every elected position than to reaffirm that I stand for what they seem to.", ">>{UWantWhatUGet} : > I would accept... Irrelevant > the **record low levels** for the Pound *and* the stock market *crashes* say it all. Maybe, but that is bullshit, just like the bigotry/racism claims. [Interesting](http://i.imgur.com/gbs2P9p.png) [Is finance your specialty?](http://i.imgur.com/JJjB0U5.png) [Is history your specialty?](http://i.imgur.com/l1uj03b.png) Look, I realize all that the left/globalists have going for them is this specter of racism from the right to scare the unwitting emotional masses to their side and that the Brexit success is both a bitch slap extraordinaire to the left/globalists and an opportunity to try to unleash the mediums to stir more specters of racism. Scotland refused to take her sovereignty two years ago and now look where she is, a pathetic co-dependent who gave herself to the very people that would keep her from getting what she actually wanted. She tried to use the UK to keep with the EU and the UK kicked her to the curb - that's what you get for surrendering your sovereignty. That is the lesson to be learned - globalist would-be whores take note.", ">>{Sidwill} : This discussion brings me back to my previous point which is tax policy has the ability to be the great leveler. Any leader who preaches protectionism is having you trade a shitty job for a job that's less shitty but results in less buying power. The globalism trend is inevitable it cannot be stopped because communication, automation and transportation has shrunk our world and will continue to do so. So the solution to income inequities in our society lays right under our noses, taxation of the haves at levels that can be reinvested in infrastructure, education , retooling our energy grids this is what we should be looking to do and despite Clinton's real and perceived issues she is on the right side of this. I love Bernie, he speaks to what I feel but we don't get to choose him this time.", ">>{rrobe53} : I'm not in disagreement with you on policy, but I am about Clinton.", '>>{njmaverick} : > Maybe, but that is bullshit, just like the bigotry/racism claims. The facts seem to strongly dispute your assertion.', ">>{Sidwill} : Let me ask you this, what is the difference between Obama or Bill and Clinton? I see zero difference from a practical standpoint it's more personality and perception. We have seen a long drawn out effort starting right after the 2012 election to knock down her numbers starting with switching blame for Benghazi from Obama to her a ploy so obvious as to be described as infantile . The Benghazi fishing expedition begat emailgate and with each released email a story is born and an article written, a nebulous story that has no payoff in actual criminal wrongdoing but a story nonetheless. Then you have the regurgitated ramblings of the right from the 90's getting play as well. I could go on, but my point is Clinton is just a run of the mill Democrat not some super criminal bent on world destruction like so many posters seem to feel.", '>>{rrobe53} : If you strip the person and look at their ideals, Hillary definitely falls closer to where I would typically vote on the spectrum. I don\'t consider Bill a great president, and consider him to have benefited greatly from the tech bubble all while playing a significant hand in the recession. Obama I don\'t think has been great, but not bad either, which is something that facing our current choices is appreciated. He\'s disappointed me a few times, and his stance on TPP is not something I enjoy. His pivot from Candidate Obama to President Obama is his biggest drawback in my eyes, and I think Hillary will repeat this. Hillary, as Obama said, will say anything she has to. Even in this election, devoid of the past 20 years of her public service, we see examples of her willingness to change her message depending on who she\'s speaking to. *Truly* evolving is one thing, her pandering is just plain lying. I don\'t trust her to do anything she says. Some of her ideas I feel she\'s pulled up too soon on, some I agree with, and some I\'m completely against. That\'s anyone though, including Sanders and Trump, so the difference comes down to what I believe they will truly deliver on and what I believe their true motives to be. Benghazi is a thing, whether the left likes it or not. Did she kill those people? No, but her character was in demonstration, as was the Republicans. They attempted to lay the dead Americans at her feet which isn\'t a good look, but I don\'t very much like her trying to blame the attack on a video while calling it something else in emails. Further, as someone who is both an IT professional and works in a cleared environment, "email-gate" is far from a non-story. I have absolutely no doubt that there was criminal wrongdoing, it\'s a matter of who did it and if they can prove it. The server itself is nothing, a slap on the wrist offense, in addition to the other shady shit that isn\'t technically illegal. The classified material on the server though... That was illegally stored, retained and not returned. That\'s where the fuck up transitions into a criminal fuck up. Regardless of that, is she a criminal bent on world destruction? No. I think very rarely is someone a villain in their own story. If Hillary is what is considered a run of the mill Democrat then my reaction is to dislike all Democrats, not to like her.', '>>{UWantWhatUGet} : I suppose if 17,000,000 people are bigots and racists, then maybe the nation should reflect that in their immigration policy. You can see from the exit polls that areas where people are transient, London and some of the university towns, Brexit was not in favor, but in the areas where families live and there are many refugees, the Brexit was in favor. Now the UK has control over its own destiny w/r/t refugees and more importantly economic migrants - good for them. It takes generations to build a good community, to have that wantonly despoiled by bureaucrats that you have no control over is the antithesis of democracy. College kids do not understand this. There is no special place in heaven for people that subject themselves to economic migrants or worse, illegals.', '>>{njmaverick} : > Now the UK has control over its own destiny w/r/t refugees and more importantly economic migrants - good for them. From what I understand that statement is not entirely accurate as the UK will need to give on this issue if they wish to trade with the EU.', '>>{UWantWhatUGet} : Then they still have control. I hope the UK sticks to its beliefs and does not fold to the coercion of the globalists. If they can hold out and refuse the blackmail, then others will surely follow, as clearly there is no evidence of the benefits of forced immigration.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Uh...when? In 2000, sure. Then, in typical Trump fashion, his position takes a total 180. In 2011, long before he was running his campaign, he did say that LGBT married couples should not receive the same rights as married heterosexual couples. Let's not even get started on what his SCOTUS nominees mean for the future of LGBT rights. He is no supporter of LGBT rights and you are deluding yourself if you think otherwise.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I'm not saying that the votes of white people do not count. I am saying that when you have these nationalists campaigns (such as Brexit) succeed, a wave of anti-immigrant sentiment follow. I don't know if you know this but there is a lot of racial incidents going on in the UK right now, including the bombing of a Halal shop. 52% of the country voted to Leave, so all the racists started becoming open about their racism. Whether it's assaulting cars of foreigners, or sending them letters calling them vermin, or blowing up their stories, it is absolutely not in my interest.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Is that a reason why I should vote for him? No. His positions are not similar to mine at all. They are closer to Clinton's.", '>>{ZestyOatBran} : I was not suggesting that you do, or that you should vote for him. Just attempting to show some reasoning why one should not be too afraid of either of these options. The world will not end with a Trump presidency or the Clinton presidency, despite what the media and reddit would have you believe.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : It isn't going to be the end of the world. That's obvious. But he is a candidate whose campaign is built by xenophobia and nationalism. Just look at the UK. Leave won, and following that all the racists felt empowered, that somehow 52% of the country had felt the same things they did. They started sending letters to immigrant families calling them vermin, putting graffiti on buildings of immigrant organizations that told them to go home, and literally bombed a Halal butcher's shop."], ['>>{darwinreyna} : Yes, Hillary Clinton just exploited the murder of a British pol', ">>{Uncle_Tom1} : HRC will literally say anything to get a vote. This shouldn't be surprising.", '>>{suseu} : But she did. No surprise there. Politics.', '>>{Osteomata} : A politician makes a comment on an international news story. Gotta be kidding or willfully distortive with this hillary-monstrousness crap.', '>>{ThisMachineKILLS} : > Cox’s life was cut short, Clinton declared, “by a violent act of political intolerance.” And she called on the United States and Britain to “stand together .\u2009.\u2009. by rejecting bigotry in all its forms.” Wow...how awful of her to say...', '>>{Walkitback} : How to not "politicize" a political assassination by a right-wing nut job? She\'s just speaking to the facts.', '>>{someguyjusttrying} : Wanting to leave the EU is "bigotry"? The guy who killed her was a whacked out lunatic but painting the opposition as "bigots" because they have different opinions on the EU is fucking ridiculous globalist rhetoric.', ">>{someguyjusttrying} : Facts don't include your personal spin on an incident.", '>>{AngerMacFadden} : A good sign of her lack of sincerity. Cox deserves better than this victimizer of women using her name for political points.', ">>{JeRouleAvecOCB} : You're on reddit, buddy. Around here, objectivity will get you killed.", '>>{someguyjusttrying} : Painting Brexit supporters as bigots and Cox as "rejecting bigotry in all its forms" would imply that she feels opposition towards the EU is, in fact, bigotry. It doesn\'t help that the guy who killed her shouted "Britain first!" right before the act, a known Brexit phrase.', '>>{ThisMachineKILLS} : Didn\'t the guy walk away yelling "Britain First" after he murdered her...?', '>>{ThisMachineKILLS} : Yeah, Britain First with their "Christian patrols" and "mosque invasions," how could anyone think they\'re bigoted...', '>>{gAlienLifeform} : Well, here I am angry about the stuff that Trump explicitly says he believes about Muslims and Mexicans, but, sure, how dare she use words that imply feelings you disagree with.', ">>{DominarRygelThe16th} : Some witnesses say he did, some say he didn't.", '>>{gAlienLifeform} : >Wanting to leave the EU is "bigotry"? You said it, not OP', ">>{YourBlogSucksToo} : You're assuming the first part of your sentence from the second part of your sentence", '>>{GonzoNation} : **???** Stating facts is a "demonstation of" what? >Cox’s life was cut short, Clinton declared, “by a violent act of political intolerance.” I don\'t get how that\'s wrong.', '>>{GonzoNation} : ??? There are a lot of votes in the UK I bet.', '>>{gAlienLifeform} : Oh, ffs, ["Thomas Mair gave his name as \'Death to traitors, freedom for Britain\', when he appeared at Westminster Magistrates\' Court."](http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36567005)', '>>{GonzoNation} : **???** How was "her name" used? Are we going to say that about the people killed in Orlando too? Their "names" were used? Ms. Cox and they were assassinated. It\'s not OK to object to assassination now!', ">>{gAlienLifeform} : I'd be inclined to agree with that assessment, but people trying to pretend that politics had no part in it whatsoever are painfully wrong and irritatingly shameless about it ITT, IMO.", '>>{ACAB112233} : He wasn\'t a whacked out lunatic. He was a fascist. Why are you people so afraid to use the word "fascist"?', ">>{AngerMacFadden} : It's funny your post implies you read mine and then you get it all wrong. Have fun trying to turn this one around on me.", '>>{ACAB112233} : ITT: A bunch of cowards who are scared to use the word "fascist" to describe the assassin.', '>>{pinata_penis_pump2} : Her full statement makes it even worse. God that woman is human garbage.', '>>{GonzoNation} : So we don\'t know whether an insane person was intolerant and Mrs. Clinton stands to pick up votes in the UK? >Cox’s life was cut short, Clinton declared, “by a violent act of political intolerance.” Why is that wrong again? I\'m sure the insane person in the UK was much more "tolerant"t than the insane shooter in Orlando who used to frequent the club he shot up? Trump is sure that we can stop people like him by banning guns and declaring war on all Muslims.', '>>{GonzoNation} : No doubt Murdoch would consider that a random utterance.', ">>{GonzoNation} : Murdoch, Karl Rove's employer. He should make a mint off of interviews of Trump in the future.", '>>{ja734} : she deserves better than her name being used to support the things she supported while she was alive? Im pretty sure thats what she would want actually.', '>>{GonzoNation} : >It\'s funny your post implies you read mine And I did. Why is the word "your" in the above post? I read it. >and then you get it all wrong. The post I responded to has the following: > this victimizer of women **using her name** So I asked: How was "her name" used? Don\'t use "you" and a negative (e.g. "got it all wrong") Thanks.', '>>{GoofballCircusFreak} : US politicians have an obsession with exploiting death for political gain. Shell casings were still falling to the floor in Orlando when both Hillary and Obama started milking the political teet with all the ferocity of a 14 year old boy with a Swank magazine.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : I see, you have no answer so now you are an english professor. Cheers.', '>>{AngerMacFadden} : Cox was a fine lady and an expert in international relations. Clinton is incompetent and corrupt. Can it get any simpler?', '>>{GonzoNation} : > US politicians have an obsession with exploiting death for political gain. But when they\'re in the UK? Does that mean this is some tradition that we picked up from their Globe Theater? Shakespeare? > "*I come to bury Caeser, not to praise him...*"', '>>{GonzoNation} : > I see, you have no answer I gave the exactly correct answer. Was an incorrect one desired?', '>>{ja734} : lol yeah shes so incompetent that shes going to cruise into the white house in the biggest landslide since 84.', ">>{deathcloc_politics} : It's not, people hate Clinton because they are told to and no one ever reads past the headlines or from sources with opposing ideology to their own", '>>{GoofballCircusFreak} : I\'d quote Sophocles to zing you back, but I don\'t know who that is. Hillary could have done a boilerplate, "Thoughts and prayers, bugabugabuga." but instead did, "Hey everyone, look at meeeeeeeee!"', ">>{DominarRygelThe16th} : That doesn't change the fact that there are conflicting witness statements. I'm not claiming to support either side, I'm just pointing out what's been reported.", '>>{gAlienLifeform} : Well, I hate Clinton for good reason I think (because she participated in the US fucking of Honduras and Libya, sold fracking to the world, ran a nasty primary campaign, and took way too much money from the pharmaceutical and finance industries, to name a few things), but attacking her for her comments here is stupid, and all the defensive projecting Brexit supporters trying to pretend bigotry and xenophobia out of existence are way more loathsome for me.', ">>{RidleyScotch} : > Shell casings were still falling to the floor in Orlando when both Hillary and Obama started milking the political teet with all the ferocity of a 14 year old boy with a Swank magazine. Ooh that's completely false. Omar Mateen was dead by 6am. The first tweet or mention or Orlando [Hillary Clinton was at](https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/741983463721553920) 9:20 AM Obama never tweeted anything on the day of and [gave remarks at 1:59pm](https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/12/remarks-president-mass-shooting-orlando) So unless bullet casings just levitated above the ground for like 5 hours until Hillary and Obama could make their statements you just completely made up some bullshit, buddy.", '>>{truthhurts4444} : Fascist is so overused these days. A fascist is basically anyone who disagrees with anyone else', ">>{GonzoNation} : > I'd quote Sophocles to zing you back, but I don't know who that is. Cute. Not British. He wrote Oedipus Rex though.", ">>{GoofballCircusFreak} : Hyperbole is apparently just a planet that shares the same solar system as the terror planet Hyperion. I'll make a note of that and try to be as literal as the Direct TV guide that runs on a continuous loop on my television since the day my wife ate the remote (I spilled chocolate on it).", ">>{gAlienLifeform} : OK, fair is fair, tho if we're going to be technical I think what I saw was that some witnesses said he said that and others weren't sure/able to here what he said, but you're right there was some confusion yesterday.", '>>{RidleyScotch} : Ah so going to play the hyperbole shtick, is that it and deflect any real discussion or criticism because you know you are wrong? If your answers and responses to the following comment is just hyperbole built upon falsities then you are just proving your own ignorance. > So we don\'t know whether an insane person was intolerant and Mrs. Clinton stands to pick up votes in the UK? > > >Cox’s life was cut short, Clinton declared, “by a violent act of political intolerance.” > > Why is that wrong again? > > > I\'m sure the insane person in the UK was much more "tolerant"t than the insane shooter in Orlando who used to frequent the club he shot up? > > Trump is sure that we can stop people like him by banning guns and declaring war on all Muslims. > ...At least some people have the intelligence to root their hyperbole in truth, whereas you just completely lied and made shit up for something that is easily rebuffed. >Hillary could have done a boilerplate, "Thoughts and prayers, bugabugabuga." but instead did, "Hey everyone, look at meeeeeeeee!" And I suppose this is hyperbole too since it\'s clear as day she did the generic thoughts and prayers stuff or is using "I"-statements too much for you to handle? No reason to waste anymore time on a moron like you.', ">>{GoofballCircusFreak} : You got me, I actually don't know what hyperbole is and I truly did believe that shell casing levitate for up to 24 hours (a quick googlie search that my wife just showed me how to do has proven me wrong!) Left to my own devices, I'd walk of the cliff of intellectualism. That is why need this circus clown riot of sub.", '>>{ShinyCoin} : That incompetent Clinton is about to be the next President of the United States. Might want to rethink the definition you have for incompetence.', '>>{ShinyCoin} : Once she becomes queen in the US. She can claim the British throne as well.', ">>{Tasty_Yams} : People might start making a connection between the white-power anti-immigrant, fascists rising in Europe, and a certain kindred spirit in American politics, who's running for president.", '>>{BlueDogDem62} : She is the political equivalent of a tire fire.', ">>{DocGonzo13} : I think it's being erroneously attributed to violent nationalist rhetoric though that is often used by facists.", '>>{Tasty_Yams} : Omar Marteen = Radical Islamic extremist Thomas Mair = ~~Radical right wing extremist~~ mentally insane', '>>{tjblue} : That she thought the murder was a bad thing?', ">>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : I honestly can't tell if this is a joke response or a serious response"]]

classify and reply

['>>{lapone1} : ‘It will be a bloodbath’: Inside the Kansas militia plot to ignite a religious war', '>>{ragekage117} : At Greenville, N.C. rally, Trump accuses the US Military of murdering "astronomical" numbers of civilians and covering it up', '>>{TrumpCardStrategy} : Only in California would they put together tax payer money to defend illegal immigrants.', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : This couldnt have been off a teleprompter could it?', ">>{NebraskaWeedOwner} : I knew it. The motherfucker couldn't wait to get on the podium when he saw he was actually polling ahead of Clinton in a poll.", ">>{Berniecanuck} : It's Time For An Emergency Jobs Program - A Green New Deal", '>>{dangzal} : Sen. Sessions: Central Park Five Ad Shows Trump Has Always Believed In Law And Order', ">>{drew418} : 20 million jobs by transitioning to green energy? Who the hell do you think you're kidding? Why not offer magic unicorns and flying ponies at this point?", '>>{2ndprize} : They actually killed tons of US citizens tons folks. They fought an entire war against other Americans. Good taxpayers slave owning Americans', ">>{RobespierrewasRight} : There is a massive difference in saying there's been an astronomical number of deaths in the middle east over the last decade and that the US' actions there helped contribute to things cooking off and what the submission title is claiming Trump said. It's like some dude in a Nascar race tapping the bumper of a guy he's trying to pass and setting off a chain-reaction of crashes and claiming he was driving full-speed in the wrong direction and purposely slammed into the herd head-on like anyone who's played a Nascar simulator has done at least once.", '>>{suckZEN} : of course sessions would see it like that, jesus christ', '>>{SplatteredRug} : Whoa this is some deplorable stuff coming out of Kansas. Here comes the charge of the spite brigade! Theirs is not to reason. Why?', '>>{birlik54} : Yeah, nothing says law and order like pushing for the execution of 5 innocent people.', '>>{ragekage117} : You know they blow up a city, and claim two people were wounded, alright? You know the real numbers, OK. The real numbers are astronomical. Astronomical. Nope. He was doing exactly that.', ">>{y4udothat} : Yeah, that's not what that incident showed to most people who were paying attention.", ">>{DeniseDeNephew} : Religious war. Why are so many religious people so willing to murder other people? Shouldn't religion get that hatred out of them?", '>>{1DFanBoi} : Is this an official campaign ad or a student film? Dogshit either way.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : Why are they protecting people who violated the law and are in this country illegally?', '>>{WorldNeedsSaddam} : Time for 35% tariffs on all goods coming from California.', ">>{questor2k} : If the GOP really wants to fix what's wrong with the Republican party, they need to start with people who have this kind of mentality. However, if you want to stay the party of angry white people,... I give you one chance in five of winning the presidency twice in the next 20 years.", '>>{HIGHx1000000NRG} : Trump blaming this on Obama and Clinton in 4, 3, 2, 1....', '>>{quandrawn} : Modern day lunch mobs are an important element of our legal system.', '>>{Rupperrt} : good luck with that. Who will subsidize the country then? Alabama?', '>>{DC25NYC} : You realize how fucked that would make the country right? They produce a LARGE amount of the produce for the country. Not to mention the state has the largest GDP in the country.', ">>{PlaaaaasticJesuuuuus} : Yeah, I'm sure Trump will get right on it when he gets into office courtesy of the Spoiler-in-Chief here.", '>>{guiltyofnothing} : /r/homeopathy or /r/gmohysteria or /r/lexingtoncitycouncil would be better for this.', '>>{ragekage117} : Now, back to my suggestion that we kill the families of suspected militants.', '>>{Dan_The_Manimal} : Not to defend Trump but they do kind of do that. An enemy combatant on drone missions is defined as any male over a certain age. So "civilian deaths" are literally just women and children. If they accidentally bombed a wedding, the bride would be a civilian casualty and the groom would be an enemy combatant. But what he said is just dumb. They\'re lying about who is dying, not how many.', ">>{KatiePuss} : She'd be lucky to get .5% of the vote, don't worry about her spoiling anything.", '>>{The-Autarkh} : Submitted a story about this yesterday, but it was classified as "off topic" (not directly relevant to US Politics). I hope this story stays up because it is highly relevant. In any event: Here\'s [the actual criminal complaint](https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/kansasplot-complaint.pdf). At least two of the three alleged domestic terrorists appear to be Trump supporters based on their social media posts: [Curtis Allen](http://www.politicususa.com/2016/10/14/men-arrested-plot-car-bomb-mosque-trump-supporter.html) [Patrick Stein](https://mobile.twitter.com/TheRealRondaLee/status/787090534007443456/photo/1) As former NSA Director Michael Hayden said: >You get to a certain point in this business, **you’re not just responsible for what you say, you are responsible for what people hear.** ------------- For purposes of discussion, here\'s the definition of **domestic terrorism** codified at [18 U.S.C. § 2331(5)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331): >(5) the term domestic terrorism means activities that— >(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; >(B) appear to be intended— >(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; >(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or >(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and >(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. --------- Also relevant, for those wanting to consider theoretical frameworks for understanding the ethno-nationalist resentment fueling this sort of violence and powering Trump\'s campaign: [**1**](http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/donald-trump-hate-groups-neo-nazi-white-supremacist-racism) [**2**](http://www.vox.com/2016/9/19/12933072/far-right-white-riot-trump-brexit)', '>>{PM_ME_UR_SHOES_GIRL} : If you want Californians to actually want to secede that would do it. No taxation without representation.', ">>{oldoneeyed} : Mark my words, if Clinton wins these maniacs are going to start killing people. They've been looking for an excuse since the 90's, *really* started looking once a black guy got into office, and now they are starting to feel like the time's at hand. Trump's not helping by whipping massive portions of the republican base into a paranoid frenzy. He's giving these maniacs an opportunity to recruit and inject their views into mainstream discourse. People are going to start dying the moment Trump loses.", ">>{cybercuzco} : >Sometimes he rode alone, sometimes he would have the confidential informant drive him. Our confidential informant, Lisa S. No no, that's too obvious, let's call her L. Simpson. So the guy knows exactly who ratted him out now.", ">>{riritried4whitedick} : You will not have a successful broadscope social program as long as the borders are open. Full stop. It's basic math not partisan politics. The program will be crushed by sheer numbers. Current job counts and pay are already being effected by immigration. E.G. 8 million jobs have been created since 2008. not only is this abysmal as thats the exact number loss from the collapse meaning theres been no net gain since even though we added more workers, but 3 Million of those jobs went to illegal immigrants. So we actually have a 3 Million job deficit unadjusted for new workers entering the work force, 8 years after the economic collapse The biggest boon to the poor and middle class would be the deportation of illegal immigrants. Illegal Immigration represents a 250 billion dollar a year wealth transfer out of the middle class and poor", ">>{Population-Tire} : Can't get a fair trial when people are always barging into court with sandwich platters.", ">>{BigT5535} : I can't wait to vote against this clown. He'll still be re-elected but I want to at least know I did my part.", '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : If you are a Republican candidate for President you kind of have to bet on having a large percentage of the military and "law and order" vote to have a shot. And true or not, Bush or Obama Administration (or any other Administration during war) the last thing you probably wanna say is that they callously killed huge numbers of citizens, because there is no WAY to spin it as pro-troops.', '>>{satosaison} : Yeah. As a good liberal, as much as I wanna hate on trump, he is correct. The US military murdered tens of thousands of civilians in Iraw and Afghanistan, and continues to cause civilian casualties through our drone wars. But plenty will argue saying it is somehow "unpatriotic," the same way that protesting police violence against blacks is somehow "anti-cop."', '>>{CarmineFields} : Yeah, implicitly calling for the execution of untried (and innocent) children is "law and order".', ">>{DC25NYC} : Why aren't republicans protecting the rights people who haven't violated the laws in this country and are here legally?", ">>{prototype7} : They are not militia, the state's militia is the National Guard. These people are terrorists...one might go so far as to call them Radical Christian Terrorists....as I have heard from the Republican party's denouncements of Pres. Obama for not referring to terrorists who are muslim as Radical Muslim Terrorists...", '>>{F22Rapture} : Please keep talking about it though, it\'ll totally "lock up" the 1% of the black vote remaining.', '>>{Berniecanuck} : If you are going to make claims like this you are going to have to provide sources', '>>{quantum_gambade} : > “Make sure if you start using your bow on them cockroaches, make sure you dip them in pig’s blood before you shoot them,” I wonder where they got that idea? [Oh, right.](http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=92502&siteSection=site_section_id&videoId=30378078)', '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : Ah yes, executing innocent people, that is the true hallmark of "law and order"!', ">>{F22Rapture} : Yeah, he's not necessarily wrong about this one.", '>>{RobespierrewasRight} : They and "the people" are really pretty ambiguous, and while he does bring up "both sides" the particulars of that could be anything from "the US military is underreporting civilian casualties" which is a legit problem to what the submission title claims. The fact that he\'s an absolutely horrible public speaker really isn\'t helping trying to make any fucking sense of what he\'s saying at all any easier, but unless he literally claimed the US military was murdering astronomical numbers of civilians it\'s ridiculous to take a rambling patchwork of statements and claim them to be such (though to be fair, he ~~did actually make a more concise claim that the US military has blood on its hands from~~ actually said he\'d have the military massacre civilians related to terrorists earlier this year, which were the results that popped up when I tried to find articles about this recent rally).', ">>{Berniecanuck} : Smearing people doesn't make the smear true. It just makes you look bad.", ">>{guiltyofnothing} : Once again, why are Stein's supporters so ashamed of her positions and her party's platform -- or her only experience as an elected official?", '>>{JacobCrim88} : [wow I had no idea this was a thing](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-4NASNQ0dgKU/V3g7yBGtF9I/AAAAAAAAyS4/IBzPMyrT1cwGigooRoiRlcNIrKPBzPU-gCLcB/s1600/Donald-Trump-1989-Newspaper-Ad-Central-Park-Five-1050x1550.png) Now I feel I should really watch that documentary.', '>>{DC25NYC} : Did i say that? Im talking about a womans right to chose, lgbtq rights, freedom of speech (which actually trump said flag burners could be deported, so yes) etc', '>>{IrishJoe} : Hope those 88 former military leaders are happy now!', '>>{Megatron_McLargeHuge} : Justice is incidental to law and order. - J. Edgar Hoover', ">>{Berniecanuck} : Not at all ashamed, you should read the platform, it's great! I talk about her elected experience all the time. Municipal government work is very very important. Hillary doesn't have any municipal experience, that's why she doesn't know how to connect with people.", '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : Yeah, if they were so innocent what were they doing in the park, playing [checkers](https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/325982969040879620)?', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Because I know you aren't going to be swayed by the moral argument, these people are critical to the California economy and, to that effect, the US economy as a whole (given CA contributes almost 1/6 of the GDP and 1/8 of the food to the country). California has no reason to force them to leave and thanks to the strong support for the #StatesRights movement that conservatives have always shown, we shouldn't have to worry about using everything in our power to stop the feds from telling us what to do, right????", ">>{Blue_Team4President} : After the election, we need to quietly take down the savagely stupid alt-reich media apparatus that's fueling this stupidity.", '>>{_tx} : Does he really think attacking the military is a good idea?', '>>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : In all seriousness, this dude is a draft dodger who claimed that his personal Vietnam was not catching the clap in night clubs in the 70\'s. He suggested that POWs are not war heroes because "he likes people who weren\'t captured." He says he knows "more about ISIS than the generals do" somehow, by being a real estate developer in Manhattan. He says that the Military is essentially a kill squad of untold innocent civilians. How can this person possibly serve as Commander In Chief?', ">>{Pvt_Larry} : Oh that informant has been whisked away by now I'm sure.", '>>{Granadafan} : The Christian Taliban strikes again. Where are the moderate Christians condemning these Trump supporters?', ">>{19thugnasty94} : Nothing pisses people off more than disagreeing with something they can't prove.", ">>{IBringYouToBurn} : Maybe we are a little more 'human' than you, or we see that they are an important part of our economy, but mostly we are not afraid of diversity and don't buy into the hate and fear mongering. edit: and great Mexican food.", ">>{Literally_A_Shill} : I saw the source, read the headline and figured he meant it as an insult. Nope, the guy's just a huge asshole.", ">>{ragekage117} : The military managed to cover up Pat Tilman's death (or rather the nature of it) for all of what, a few months ? I don't believe they could cover up a massacring a whole city for a weekend.", ">>{mcstutteringbuddha} : Radical white christian extremist terrorists. If you don't say it, you can't fight it.", '>>{Berniecanuck} : You have to have the guts to fight for it.', ">>{DC25NYC} : Being that they just legalized weed, I feel it won't hurt them in the least bit.", ">>{Berniecanuck} : Magic unicorns and flying ponies is what the Ds and Rs have been offering for years and look where we're at. I'll take the green new deal thanks!", '>>{aiken_} : A while ago I would have agreed, but I am over the "we can\'t blame him for what he says because he doesn\'t make enough sense to be sure of exactly what he meant" thing. He seems to clearly be saying that: * There is a lot of death on both sides * "They" blow up a city and report two people wounded, but we know the real numbers are astronomical * The U.S. started the whole thing * We are going to solve the ISIS problem * To solve the ISIS problem we have to get back and solve it strongly and swiftly * We also have to rebuild the US because is going to hell * The US infrastructure is a disaster There is no reasonable interpretation of "they" blowing up cities and massively undercounting casualties other than the US, or the Obama administration. Maybe he really meant that ISIS claims fewer injuries than they inflict, and he doesn\'t know that they are notorious for seeking maximum publicity for the harm they do, so it makes it look like he\'s talking about the US. But I don\'t believe that.', ">>{6gentexan} : So you're saying the only way you can survive economically as a state is by supporting illegal activity? Great! I propose we send every illegal immigrant to California...as well as any and all unvetted refugees....", '>>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Have a downvote for being that guy who has to comment on his report.', ">>{mcstutteringbuddha} : If Trump were President, he'd bomb the shit out of these terrorists, amirite?", '>>{Literally_A_Shill} : Even after they were fully exonerated. Even after courts found that they should be given millions as compensation. Trump still tweets this - >Tell me, what were they doing in the Park, playing checkers? Trump really lives in a world where minorities are all violent rapists incapable of doing almost anything else. Even when facts prove otherwise.', '>>{SeanECE} : Remind me 24 days I want you to be wrong, I want you to be wrong......', '>>{Berniecanuck} : Both Trump and Clinton are spoiled rotten. #avoteforclintonisavotefortrump #avotefortrumpisavoteforclinton', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : Define what you mean exactly when you call these things "rights." Referring to the first two. >freedom of speech (which actually trump said flag burners could be deported, so yes) This wasn\'t a serious comment.', ">>{aiken_} : I would be so incredibly impressed if he stood up and said that clearly. And it would be a patriotic thing to do. Instead, he's doing the word salad thing where people want to support him can select the meaning they prefer -- either he's acknowledging a lot of civilian deaths and is therefore a straight shooter and patriotic, or he's saying nothing of the sort and therefore doesn't need to be censured for being unpatriotic.", '>>{ragekage117} : You mean like when he said US soldiers stole pallets of money? Sorry someone said something true and inconvenient about your Messiah.', ">>{waiv} : He even wrote an Op Ed claiming that they shouldn't be paid compensation because they were probably guilty of something else.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : California's economy is depending on people who are here illegally? That's not even funny, that's just sad.", '>>{RichardThe3} : Senator Sessions won 95%+ of the vote in his 2014 general election. No joke.', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : What I'm saying is that the California and US economy as a whole would not survive the sudden shock of deporting hundreds of thousands without severe consequences. So what should be done is to allow those who live productive, non-criminal lives here the chance to gain citizenship through work. Once that is done, tighten up the border control all you want (cost effectively that is) and create a system that allows for ONLY legal immigration moving forward but enough so that our country can thrive from it. >as well as any and all unvetted refugees Good thing the US doesn't allow for unvetted refugees. I would be very against that. They are all heavily vetted, more so than most countries around the world and because of that I'm fine with vetted refugees coming to California.", ">>{Tafkaharambe} : I mean there's a lot of atheists. That's like saying why are so many black people gang affiliated. Shouldn't their past make them want to all love in harmony?", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Maybe we are a little more 'human' than you, Wanting people to be in this country legally is inhuman? >or we see that they are an important part of our economy, If California's economy is dependent on people who are here illegally, that's sad. >but mostly we are not afraid of diversity Neither am I. >and don't buy into the hate and fear mongering. Wanting people to be in this country legally means I bought into hate and fear mongering? I just want the people in this country to be here legally. To be legal citizens. Why's that bad?", '>>{thebearcredentials} : Too much hate and too many guns in this country', '>>{Meatsim1} : I hope they ask the candidates what they think about this during the debate', '>>{buzzlightlime} : >"militia" It\'s a terrorist cell. Literally nothing about this action distinguishes it from any other terrorist act except the skin colour of the perpetrators', ">>{canteloupy} : I think the group was pretty small they already know. Like it was the one who didn't get charged.", ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Are you trying to hurt my pride or something? Because I could give fuck all about pride when it comes to making sure the economy of the state and US continues to thrive. The well being of people, legal residents as well, is at stake so sad be it! I'm speaking from a realistic point of view. Your economy, if you live in the US, depends on these people as well.", ">>{TheGoddamnSpiderman} : In addition to the economic argument other people already posted, they're saying they're just not going to help Trump if he tries mass deportations, not that they'll actively prevent federal agents from acting, which California can't do. The reason for policies like this is that if the local illegal immigrant population isn't worried about the local police deporting them they're more likely to be willing speak to the local government about other more serious crimes amongst other things.", ">>{6gentexan} : Well don't look now, but half this country would love to let them in with minimal vetting. And a lot of people(cities, churches, and universities) are already proclaiming they will offer sanctuary. The US was made with immigrants, and I stand behind this 100%. I'm only 1/8 Native American, the rest of my lineage migrated here from other parts of the world. But, it HAS to be done legally...and also times have changed, the process has got to be more strict to ensure our safety... If California or any other state in the US can't handle the economics of losing 11 million illegal immigrants, it's really on the people who have allowed it to get so bad in the first place...it isn't going to get easier if we wait to make the changes...I'm not opposed to letting the illegals that are here now(that are here strictly for a better life) to stay as long as they take ALL the necessary steps to become legal ASAP. If they can't qualify within a certain time frame, then they need to go...come back when you can qualify. I think you'll find that this is exactly what's going to happen. The wall will be built, the illegals that are already here will be vetted, the good ones given a chance, the criminals chucked back over the wall...", ">>{belisaurius} : There is no 'humane removal' solution for 12 million+ people. That's just reality.", '>>{gumbii87} : Um. Violent crime. Gun crime more specifically. Gun murders and violent crime are both at their lowest levels in nearly half a century they. Despite there being more guns in circulation now than ever before.', '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : Every comment the President or President-Elect makes should be interpreted seriously, unless at an obviously comical event. The PEOTUS\' twitter is not a comical event (well, not intentionally), and so everything he writes there should be assumed to be serious. You don\'t get to excuse his words with "it\'s only a joke, bro!", because the other nations of this world aren\'t going to believe you.', ">>{belisaurius} : Nothing is serious to you unless it agrees with you. Everything that's fucking crazy that he's done isn't 'serious'. How do you feel about the very serious situation that, so far, Trump has only broken promises he made to you?", '>>{thebearcredentials} : Where? Are you talking about crime where the perpetrator are caught? Are you talking about crime not related to gun violence? And what is the source for your claim?', '>>{gumbii87} : No. Just about all types. Homicide stands out more than others but statistically, violent crime in the US has been on steady decline since the early 1990s. https://www.statista.com/statistics/191219/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/ https://mises.org/blog/fbi-us-homicide-rate-51-year-low https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/violent-crime/violent-crime-topic-page/violentcrimemain_final', ">>{IBringYouToBurn} : In short, they are here with the tacit approval of past administrations because they contribute to the economy of the US. Now because the economy is a little tough people think that kicking them out will solve their problems, it won't. It won't bring back manufacturing jobs, or the coal industry, or whatever the problem is in bumfuck Kansas. Personally I would rather live in a Hispanic community than a conservative republican one. Hispanics are a generous and kind people, excluding the bad apples that are a part of all groups of people. PS I didn't necessarily mean you in particular.", ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : > There is no 'humane removal' solution for 12 million+ people. That's just reality. Most would self deport. We'd probably only have to physically deport around 30%.", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Are you trying to hurt my pride or something? Not at all. I was simply saying that that is a sad state of affairs.', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >The reason for policies like this is that if the local illegal immigrant population isn't worried about the local police deporting them they're more likely to be willing speak to the local government about other more serious crimes amongst other things. This is a reasoned response. Thank you", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : Humane in the context of your sentence is subjective. Also, most would likely self deport.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Every comment the President or President-Elect makes should be interpreted seriously, unless at an obviously comical event. Should be to who, to you? Sounds like your opinion. >The PEOTUS\' twitter is not a comical event (well, not intentionally), and so everything he writes there should be assumed to be serious. Again, should be to who? You? >You don\'t get to excuse his words with "it\'s only a joke, bro!", because the other nations of this world aren\'t going to believe you. Speculation. You\'re assuming other nations can\'t tell the difference between serious and non serious words.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Nothing is serious to you unless it agrees with you. Not true. >Everything that\'s fucking crazy that he\'s done isn\'t \'serious\'. "Fucking crazy" is subjective. >How do you feel about the very serious situation that, so far, Trump has only broken promises he made to you? Which promises has he broken that he made to me? Keep in mind that if you may view a promise a serious, whereas I did not.', '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : Fuck me where do I start. >Well don\'t look now, but half this country would love to let them in with minimal vetting. You don\'t have a source for this claim because it doesn\'t exist. The vetting didn\'t decrease in stringency under Obama. >But, it HAS to be done legally...and also times have changed, the process has got to be more strict to ensure our safety... It is already strict. Vetting takes ~7 years. >If California or any other state in the US can\'t handle the economics of losing 11 million illegal immigrants, it\'s really on the people who have allowed it to get so bad in the first place The whole of the US can\'t handle that shock, that\'s the point. This isn\'t about the problems of some far off state; California produces a significant percentage of the US\' food. Crashing their economy crashes the US economy. >as they take ALL the necessary steps to become legal ASAP. If they can\'t qualify within a certain time frame, then they need to go This takes literal years, plural, and that\'s for someone who tried to enter the US legally. Our immigration system is broken, and instead deportation, the liberals want to make it more efficient. No, that does not mean open borders. No, that does not mean less vetting for people from high risk areas. >I think you\'ll find that this is exactly what\'s going to happen...the illegals that are already here will be vetted, the good ones given a chance, This explicitly won\'t happen if Trump follows through on his "deport 11 million" thing. >The wall will be built You people are going to be so disappointed.', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >In short, they are here with the tacit approval of past administrations because they contribute to the economy of the US. Just because they contribute to the economy, doesn't make it okay to be here illegally. >Now because the economy is a little tough people think that kicking them out will solve their problems, it won't. It won't bring back manufacturing jobs, or the coal industry, or whatever the problem is in bumfuck Kansas. I'm not talking about any of that. I'm talking about wanting the people who are here in this country to be here legally. >Hispanics are a generous and kind people, excluding the bad apples that are a part of all groups of people. These are weird generalizations.", '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : It should be because politics doesn\'t work by a hypothetical president TWEETING something along the lines of "we need to deport all of the Asians" or "I want to nuke Saudi Arabia" and then having some PR guy going "It\'s just a joke! He wasn\'t serious!" The reality of international politics is that other countries take the elected representatives of a country\'s government at their word. It\'s how the game has to be played, to ensure other countries can have confidence in you. If you take away that certainty, if anything you say can be construed as not serious, then no country will want to sign anything with you, or negotiate anything with you, or want to have anything to do with you. How will they know they can take you by your word? The international system runs on money, and money runs on trust. You take away that trust and everything falls apart. Every past President knew this. Just because you don\'t doesn\'t make it not so.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >It should be because politics doesn\'t work by a hypothetical president TWEETING something along the lines of "we need to deport all of the Asians" or "I want to nuke Saudi Arabia" and then having some PR guy going "It\'s just a joke! He wasn\'t serious!" I don\'t remember him tweeting either of those things. Those are ridiculoualy hyperbolic examples. Also, if you are unable to tell the difference between someone saying something seriously, and someone saying something not seriously, I don\'t know how to help you. >The reality of international politics is that other countries take the elected representatives of a country\'s government at their word. It\'s how the game has to be played, to ensure other countries can have confidence in you. If you take away that certainty, if anything you say can be construed as not serious, then no country will want to sign anything with you, or negotiate anything with you, or want to have anything to do with you. How will they know they can take you by your word? Most people are able to tell when someone is being serious and when someone is not being serious. Most people have the ability to understand human behavior. I can\'t imagine what life would be like if we didn\'t have the ability to differentiate serious and non serious words and actions.', '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : I said hypothetical president, not Trump. The statements were meant to be ludicrous to highlight the point. Listen, I\'m sorry you don\'t get the basic ideas behind international politics. I\'ll try to explain it through logic, but i have my doubts it will reach you. President of Country A, who has a large air force and means to deploy them thousands of miles away, says through a social media platform (where messages are restricted to 140 characters), that they want to create a no fly zone over Country B. Country B has had some tension with country A in the past, and shares a border with country C, who is an ally of Country A through a treaty under a different President of country A. Country C does not have a strong military due to being smaller than country A. The question is, should Country B and Country C take this comment seriously? Obviously, there are two possible answers; yes, or no. Examine the "yes" answer. Now Country B has to assume the new President of Country A wants to put a no fly zone over their country. They need to take immediate preparations, get people on the phones, begin negotiating. Because of the unofficial nature of the statement\'s release by President of A (due to the President of A not holding regular press conferences), things are especially confusing. Country C sees the military action in country B and begins to get worried. They recall how the President of A had made some very nationalistic, isolationist remarks. Should they try to find other allies? Back to country C. They now are ready for Country A to try an place a no fly zone on them. If that zone materializes, they are prepared. If it never gets put into action, at least they were ready for it. Assume that the first case is a win for them, resulting in a 1. The second case is neither a win nor a loss, resulting in a 0. If they had assumed the President of A was not serious, then they would not have taken action to prepare. If the no fly zone had not materialized, then the result would be the same, if not slightly better. If however, they assumed the comment wasn\'t serious but it actually was, now there is a no fly zone over their country and they were not prepared for it. This is a the worst case scenario for them. The first case is neither a win nor a loss, resulting in a 0. The second case, however, is a unequivocal loss, resulting in a -1. One choice roughly leads to either an outcome of 1, or an outcome of 0. The other choice roughly leads to an outcome of 0, or an outcome of -1. The choice then becomes obvious, right? The point is, other countries HAVE to take what our President says seriously. It\'s how the game of international politics is played. They don\'t have the luxury of saying "oh, he wasn\'t being serious, he was just joking". This process is completely divorced from human nature. It\'s a rational assessment of risk using game theory. You\'re treating the President Elect like he\'s a normal citizen. he isn\'t. he\'s soon to be the Chief Executive, the foremost Ambassador, and the Commander in Chief of the United States. His words represent the US to the rest of the world and he needs to be taken seriously.', ">>{belisaurius} : How do we even have a constructive conversation when you openly tell me that you're entirely fickle in how you treat 'promises'?", ">>{belisaurius} : You seriously think, that 12 million people who went through the effort of getting here illegally would simply turn around and go back? What about the places that, even if their citizens voluntarily came back, won't take them? China absolutely does not want the 2.5 million illegal Chinese citizens back.", ">>{belisaurius} : Are you fucking serious? Why in the world do you think that anyone who is here illegally would 'self deport'? They came here for a reason. More than that, what about the countries that don't want their fleeing citizens back. How are we going to make China take there 2.5 million wayward citizens back? Further, you do realize that 'physically deporting' (at your low estimate) **4 million** people liberally spread around the country is impossible, right? Who would do it? Are we going to have a federal taskforce? Who's spending the money to do this? Where are we putting them? Are we flying them home? What happens if they resist? What happens if actual citizens resist? You ignorant children have spent zero time actually figuring out how to implement your crazy fucking ideas.", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : Promises that are meant to be taken seriously and literally, I take seriously and literally. Promises that are not meant to be taken seriously and literally, I do not take seriously and literally.', ">>{belisaurius} : Who decides whether they are 'meant to be taken' either way? You? Me? Trump? An independent third party? Is there some secret code to which ones are serious and which ones aren't? What happens when you don't take one seriously, but he does? What happens in the reverse? Why, exactly, is it okay with you that your President makes non-serious promises?", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >The question is, should Country B and Country C take this comment seriously? If the comment was made seriously, they should take it seriously. If it was not made seriously, they should not. If that's uncertainty as to whether or not it was made seriously, they should reach out for clarification.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >You seriously think, that 12 million people who went through the effort of getting here illegally would simply turn around and go back? I imagine some would self deport, yes. Not all of course. >What about the places that, even if their citizens voluntarily came back, won't take them? China absolutely does not want the 2.5 million illegal Chinese citizens back. That's a tricky situation. Of course, if they entered the country legally instead of illegally, they wouldn't be facing the situation at all.", '>>{OnlyFactsMatter} : >Why in the world do you think that anyone who is here illegally would \'self deport\'? Fear of deportation. >They came here for a reason. They feel California belongs to Mexico. >How are we going to make China take there 2.5 million wayward citizens back? They will. >Further, you do realize that \'physically deporting\' (at your low estimate) 4 million people liberally spread around the country is impossible, right? It is not impossible. >Who would do it? Are we going to have a federal taskforce? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback Mexico deports more Central/South American illegals than the U.S. does. Question - if someone entered your house without your permission, would you let that person stay or call the police? Or are they just an "undocumented resident" at your house?', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Who decides whether they are 'meant to be taken' either way? You? Me? Trump? An independent third party? Is there some secret code to which ones are serious and which ones aren't? It should be obvious how they are to be taken. If you can't differentiate between something that is meant to be taken seriously, and something that is not, I'm not sure how to help you. >What happens when you don't take one seriously, but he does? What happens in the reverse? Then you have misunderstood him. >Why, exactly, is it okay with you that your President makes non-serious promises? Because I am able to recognize when things are said not seriously, but are said hypothetically, rhetorically, etc. Why would I not be ok with that?", '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : The only way for them to know if the comment was made seriously without clarification is if the situation was clearly not serious, such as Obama\'s appearance on "Between Two Ferns". Even then, the President still has to be selective on what they joke about. However, sometimes the nature of the comment means that the time it takes to reach clarification is time lost in preparation if the comment is true. Even then, the President should always be clear with what they say. If a President needs the seriousness of their comments clarified often, that is a significant problem. Finally, you\'re assuming everyone assumes the same way about seriousness, and has the same reactions. Think of a dictator of a small militaristic country. They have a fragile ego and an itchy trigger finger. The President makes a comment about taking military action against them, and does so AGAIN via a tweet. It turns out the comment wasn\'t serious, according to the PR people, but that Dictator has already taken hostage several American businessmen in response to the tweet. That non serious tweet just created a serious international problem. Your putting seriousness through the lens of your day to day interaction with others, and not thinking of it in the larger context of international relations. They don\'t function like how you talk with coworkers, friends, customers, and thus don\'t follow the same rules.', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : I don't think either of us are going to convince the other of anything, as we're approaching this conversation from completely different mindsets and perceptions.", ">>{belisaurius} : Sure. None of us would be talking about this if we had addressed it earlier (side note: **CLIMATE CHANGE**). But now that we are here, it's irrelevant to talk about 'could have beens'. We have a situation where, in order to 'rid ourselves of illegal immigrants', we would have to force China to take 2.5 million people back. Not just any random *couple million* people either, though. These are people who have lived and worked in a western democracy, sometimes for literally decades. These people are the biggest societal threat China could face in its modern history. Tell me. How are we going to make China take these people back? And if we can't make China do it, exactly how quickly do you think *other* countries are going to hop on board that policy? We are the richest country on Earth, and these people contribute to that. Sending them to poor places, with no ability to absorb these people, while simultaneously fucking our own economy in the ass seems like a pretty shit idea. This, of course, ignoring the fact that we would have to forcibly gather millions of people from all across an entire continent. But here's the even more fun part: a majority of illegal immigrants live in cities (as does a majority of the population in general). What happens when local, American citizens resist your efforts to deport their family? Are we going to start cordoning off cities and systematically searching them? At what point does that cross over from 'Totally Cool American Thing To Do' and into 'Actual Holocaust'? We can all sit around, pondering a happy time when there were no illegal immigrants (hint: that has never been the case). Or we can even rail at our forefathers for giving us this situation (hint: you're taking it in the ass from your GOP forefathers and you're thanking them for it). But what we can't do is pretend that we can *reverse* this situation. It is way too late to do that in a way that wouldn't irrevocably fuck up everything we are.", ">>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : Likely not. I would like to be snide and say I'm approaching this from the established conduct of international politics mindset, but that would be ignoring the possibility of your idea on how it should work gaining traction in the future. Instead, I will just ask you this, since you seem to have a strong sense as to when Trump is being serious or not. Trump has promised, regarding the minimum wage, the following things: 1) Leave the federal minimum wage at $7.25 per hour, which is already too high. 2) Raise the federal minimum wage to $10 per hour, as $7.25 is too low and “the minimum wage has to go up.” 3) Allow states to set their own minimum wage. Now as you can tell, each of these statements contradicts the other two. Only one can actually happen. So, which one was he being serious about, and which two was he ~~lying~~ not being serious about? What should people who support raising the minimum wage assume? What about people who don't support raising the minimum wage?", ">>{belisaurius} : Okay, so since you're unable to really grasp what I'm asking in an objective way; let's move on to concrete examples. Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to jail Hilary Clinton? Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to build a wall? Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to drain the swamp? And, if the answer is 'no' to any of these, what do you say to your fellow Trump voters who very much did believe he was going to do these things? What do you say to the people who have publicly said they feel betrayed by Donald Trump's post election choices?", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to jail Hilary Clinton? No. >Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to build a wall? Yes. >Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to drain the swamp? Yes. >And, if the answer is 'no' to any of these, what do you say to your fellow Trump voters who very much did believe he was going to do these things? I'm sorry that they believed he was serious about jailing her. >What do you say to the people who have publicly said they feel betrayed by Donald Trump's post election choices? I'm sorry to hear that.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Sure. None of us would be talking about this if we had addressed it earlier (side note: **CLIMATE CHANGE**). But now that we are here, it's irrelevant to talk about 'could have beens'. We have a situation where, in order to 'rid ourselves of illegal immigrants', we would have to force China to take 2.5 million people back. Or force them to go through the process to become legal citizens. >Tell me. How are we going to make China take these people back? Not sure. >We can all sit around, pondering a happy time when there were no illegal immigrants (hint: that has never been the case). Or we can even rail at our forefathers for giving us this situation (hint: you're taking it in the ass from your GOP forefathers and you're thanking them for it). But what we can't do is pretend that we can *reverse* this situation. It is way too late to do that in a way that wouldn't irrevocably fuck up everything we are. Force them to go through the process to become legal citizens?", ">>{belisaurius} : What is an appropriate time frame on the wall promise? When does it become an unfulfilled promise? And your opinion of 'swamp draining' is to appoint a slew of lobbyists and billionaires to the highest echelons of government? You seem to have zero concern for the consequences of Trump's actions on your fellow citizens, or your fellow Trump voters.", ">>{belisaurius} : What would that process entail? Because, I assure you, if there were any avenue open for these people to become legal citizens in a way that doesn't overtly disrupt their lives, they would do it in a heartbeat. You do realize that what you're asking for is normally called a 'path to citizenship' and it's usually a democratic position?", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : On that specific issue, I would say that he was being serious about all of those statements, and his stance on minimum wage is not currently locked down, his stance is changing and evolving as time goes on.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >What is an appropriate time frame on the wall promise? I don\'t think there\'s a real answer to this. Too subjective. >When does it become an unfulfilled promise? When he definitely says that no wall in any form will ever be built, and that building a wall is no longer part of his platform. >And your opinion of \'swamp draining\' is to appoint a slew of lobbyists and billionaires to the highest echelons of government? Billionaires have nothing to do with the swamp, and never have. "Draining the swamp" refers to a political establishment, not a wealth establishment. What percent of his cabinet picks are lobbyists? A big part of his plan to drain the swamp is his plan for ethics reform. https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trumps-five-point-plan-for-ethics-reform >You seem to have zero concern for the consequences of Trump\'s actions on your fellow citizens, or your fellow Trump voters. I have concerns for all of those things. However, I also live in the real world, and know that no matter what Trump does, some of my fellow citizens as well as my fellow Trump supporters will be unhappy. You can\'t satisfy 100% of the people 100% of the time.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >What would that process entail? Not sure. >Because, I assure you, if there were any avenue open for these people to become legal citizens in a way that doesn\'t overtly disrupt their lives, they would do it in a heartbeat. Define "overtly disrupt their lives." I would, for example, want them to pay any taxes that they would have been legally obligated to pay had they been living here legally. There should also be some kind of additional form of required repayment. Paying a one-time fee for entering the country and living here illegally, having to spend some time serving in the military, etc. >You do realize that what you\'re asking for is normally called a \'path to citizenship\' and it\'s usually a democratic position? Does the democratic position align with what I said above? That is, making them pay any taxes that should have paid plus some additional form of required repayment for entering and living here illegally?', '>>{a57782} : We have representation. "No taxation without representation" was literal. The colonies had literally no representation at all. No other state in the country has as many representatives as California. We have 53 in the house of Reps, the next closest state is Texas at 32. Still, putting a 35% tariff on California isn\'t going to happen. Constitutionally it\'s banned.', '>>{belisaurius} : By and large, yes actually it does. You certainly do not have an opinion in line with anyone on the Trump side of the political spectrum. What is somewhat concerning is that you don\'t already know this? How was this not something you looked into before you voted? Be that as it may, I do have a question about what you\'ve proposed: currently, the only taxes that illegal immigrants don\'t pay are federal income taxes. They contribute to social security, they pay all excise taxes you and I pay (sales tax, road tolls, etc). In addition, the vast majority of illegal immigrants are in a wealth bracket that would lead to zero income taxes at either the state or federal level. So, in reality, they \'owe\' us nothing. They\'ve been contributing to our economy and our tax base for *free* for *decades*. It\'s actually, theoretically \'better\' for us as a country to continue having \'two tiers\' of residents. "Citizens" who get the benefits and "legal workers" who get nothing. So, what exactly, do these law abiding, tax paying, 12+ million people owe us, exactly?', '>>{PM_ME_UR_SHOES_GIRL} : The Electoral College disenfranchises us and we should have more representatives based on our population.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >By and large, yes actually it does. Can you show me then? >You certainly do not have an opinion in line with anyone on the Trump side of the political spectrum. I\'d much rather they be deported, but if deportation is proven truly impossible, some other kind of deal could be made. >What is somewhat concerning is that you don\'t already know this? How was this not something you looked into before you voted? These questions tie to the "can you show me" question above. >Be that as it may, I do have a question about what you\'ve proposed: currently, the only taxes that illegal immigrants don\'t pay are federal income taxes. They contribute to social security, they pay all excise taxes you and I pay (sales tax, road tolls, etc). What about illegal immigrants who are paid in cash? >In addition, the vast majority of illegal immigrants are in a wealth bracket that would lead to zero income taxes at either the state or federal level. So, in reality, they \'owe\' us nothing. They\'ve been contributing to our economy and our tax base for *free* for *decades*. It\'s actually, theoretically \'better\' for us as a country to continue having \'two tiers\' of residents. "Citizens" who get the benefits and "legal workers" who get nothing. So, what exactly, do these law abiding, tax paying, 12+ million people owe us, exactly? Reparations for violating the law and entering the country, as well as living here, illegally.', '>>{HoldingTheFire} : Most would do it legally if them was a path available.', ">>{belisaurius} : [From the White House Website:](https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/immigration/earned-citizenship) >We have to deal with the 11 million individuals who are here illegally. We all agree that these men and women should have to earn their way to citizenship. But for comprehensive immigration reform to work, it must be clear from the outset that there is a pathway to citizenship. We’ve got to lay out a path — a process that includes passing a background check, paying taxes, paying a penalty, learning English, and then going to the back of the line, behind all the folks who are trying to come here legally. That's only fair. I think that's a pretty clean summary of what you're asking for. I happen to think that extracting reparations from the poorest among us is an exercise in futility, but that's just me.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >We have to deal with the 11 million individuals who are here illegally. We all agree that these men and women should have to earn their way to citizenship. But for comprehensive immigration reform to work, it must be clear from the outset that there is a pathway to citizenship. We’ve got to lay out a path — a process that includes passing a background check, paying taxes, **paying a penalty**, learning English, and then going to the back of the line, behind all the folks who are trying to come here legally. That's only fair. What does the penalty entail? >I think that's a pretty clean summary of what you're asking for. I happen to think that extracting reparations from the poorest among us is an exercise in futility, but that's just me. Reparations doesn't necessarily mean money. Could also mean forcing a few years of service in the military, for example.", ">>{belisaurius} : I'm pretty sure that the military wouldn't want anything to do with these people. The average age of an illegal immigrant is in the upper 30s. I'm also not sure who would enforce any 'mandatory' anything. But that's a question that could be answered in bipartisan discussion of what exactly a 'penalty' would be. But that's the important thing: a cogent discussion between parties about an appropriate long term solution to immigration in the United States. That doesn't happen because the GOP has such a hardline stance on this. Which you apparently don't agree with in the slightest.", '>>{6gentexan} : Seriously??? Lol the source is the facts! There are already roughly 11 MILLION illegal aliens in this country already...and there are ALOT of people willing to just instantly turn them into citizens...:and how about the terrorist that hit OSU?? they were "vetted" but apparently the vetting process isn\'t as strict as you claim....therefore if you are comfortable with how things are, I\'m MORE than willing to let them go live in YOUR neighborhood', ">>{sbhikes} : I think California should withhold its strawberries, avocados, peaches, almonds, honey and wine from the red states. I'm sure China would be happy to pick up the slack.", '>>{t-reddit} : Of course they will fight Trump on this. Because without undocumented immigrants California\'s economy would fall apart. And in other news, we in "liberal" California 1) support the death penalty 2) do not provide universal health care and 3) do not give a shit about our homeless problem.', '>>{DrinkVictoryGin} : The point is that it would be shooting ourselves in the foot to deport the migrant farmworkers who do the back breaking work of picking our crops.', '>>{DrinkVictoryGin} : We have always had an immigrant underclass to do the backbreaking work that citizens don\'t want to do. It would be self-defeating to deport the laborers who pick our fruits and vegetables. We need people to do that work. California is a highly agricultural state. This isn\'t about defending "illegals". Its about protecting farmers\' incomes and our food supply.', ">>{cheapStryker} : I live in California, we have about 10 to 15 million illegal immigrants from Mexico. I'm not saying deport them all, but how many more do we need to pick fruit?"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{dangzal} : Sen. Sessions: Central Park Five Ad Shows Trump Has Always Believed In Law And Order', '>>{suckZEN} : of course sessions would see it like that, jesus christ', '>>{birlik54} : Yeah, nothing says law and order like pushing for the execution of 5 innocent people.', ">>{y4udothat} : Yeah, that's not what that incident showed to most people who were paying attention.", ">>{questor2k} : If the GOP really wants to fix what's wrong with the Republican party, they need to start with people who have this kind of mentality. However, if you want to stay the party of angry white people,... I give you one chance in five of winning the presidency twice in the next 20 years.", '>>{quandrawn} : Modern day lunch mobs are an important element of our legal system.', ">>{Population-Tire} : Can't get a fair trial when people are always barging into court with sandwich platters.", ">>{BigT5535} : I can't wait to vote against this clown. He'll still be re-elected but I want to at least know I did my part.", '>>{CarmineFields} : Yeah, implicitly calling for the execution of untried (and innocent) children is "law and order".', '>>{F22Rapture} : Please keep talking about it though, it\'ll totally "lock up" the 1% of the black vote remaining.', '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : Ah yes, executing innocent people, that is the true hallmark of "law and order"!', '>>{JacobCrim88} : [wow I had no idea this was a thing](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-4NASNQ0dgKU/V3g7yBGtF9I/AAAAAAAAyS4/IBzPMyrT1cwGigooRoiRlcNIrKPBzPU-gCLcB/s1600/Donald-Trump-1989-Newspaper-Ad-Central-Park-Five-1050x1550.png) Now I feel I should really watch that documentary.', '>>{Megatron_McLargeHuge} : Justice is incidental to law and order. - J. Edgar Hoover', '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : Yeah, if they were so innocent what were they doing in the park, playing [checkers](https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/325982969040879620)?', ">>{Literally_A_Shill} : I saw the source, read the headline and figured he meant it as an insult. Nope, the guy's just a huge asshole.", '>>{Literally_A_Shill} : Even after they were fully exonerated. Even after courts found that they should be given millions as compensation. Trump still tweets this - >Tell me, what were they doing in the Park, playing checkers? Trump really lives in a world where minorities are all violent rapists incapable of doing almost anything else. Even when facts prove otherwise.', ">>{waiv} : He even wrote an Op Ed claiming that they shouldn't be paid compensation because they were probably guilty of something else.", '>>{RichardThe3} : Senator Sessions won 95%+ of the vote in his 2014 general election. No joke.'], ['>>{TrumpCardStrategy} : Only in California would they put together tax payer money to defend illegal immigrants.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : Why are they protecting people who violated the law and are in this country illegally?', '>>{WorldNeedsSaddam} : Time for 35% tariffs on all goods coming from California.', '>>{Rupperrt} : good luck with that. Who will subsidize the country then? Alabama?', '>>{DC25NYC} : You realize how fucked that would make the country right? They produce a LARGE amount of the produce for the country. Not to mention the state has the largest GDP in the country.', '>>{PM_ME_UR_SHOES_GIRL} : If you want Californians to actually want to secede that would do it. No taxation without representation.', ">>{DC25NYC} : Why aren't republicans protecting the rights people who haven't violated the laws in this country and are here legally?", '>>{DC25NYC} : Did i say that? Im talking about a womans right to chose, lgbtq rights, freedom of speech (which actually trump said flag burners could be deported, so yes) etc', ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Because I know you aren't going to be swayed by the moral argument, these people are critical to the California economy and, to that effect, the US economy as a whole (given CA contributes almost 1/6 of the GDP and 1/8 of the food to the country). California has no reason to force them to leave and thanks to the strong support for the #StatesRights movement that conservatives have always shown, we shouldn't have to worry about using everything in our power to stop the feds from telling us what to do, right????", ">>{IBringYouToBurn} : Maybe we are a little more 'human' than you, or we see that they are an important part of our economy, but mostly we are not afraid of diversity and don't buy into the hate and fear mongering. edit: and great Mexican food.", ">>{DC25NYC} : Being that they just legalized weed, I feel it won't hurt them in the least bit.", ">>{6gentexan} : So you're saying the only way you can survive economically as a state is by supporting illegal activity? Great! I propose we send every illegal immigrant to California...as well as any and all unvetted refugees....", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : Define what you mean exactly when you call these things "rights." Referring to the first two. >freedom of speech (which actually trump said flag burners could be deported, so yes) This wasn\'t a serious comment.', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : California's economy is depending on people who are here illegally? That's not even funny, that's just sad.", ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : What I'm saying is that the California and US economy as a whole would not survive the sudden shock of deporting hundreds of thousands without severe consequences. So what should be done is to allow those who live productive, non-criminal lives here the chance to gain citizenship through work. Once that is done, tighten up the border control all you want (cost effectively that is) and create a system that allows for ONLY legal immigration moving forward but enough so that our country can thrive from it. >as well as any and all unvetted refugees Good thing the US doesn't allow for unvetted refugees. I would be very against that. They are all heavily vetted, more so than most countries around the world and because of that I'm fine with vetted refugees coming to California.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Maybe we are a little more 'human' than you, Wanting people to be in this country legally is inhuman? >or we see that they are an important part of our economy, If California's economy is dependent on people who are here illegally, that's sad. >but mostly we are not afraid of diversity Neither am I. >and don't buy into the hate and fear mongering. Wanting people to be in this country legally means I bought into hate and fear mongering? I just want the people in this country to be here legally. To be legal citizens. Why's that bad?", ">>{Socrates_Burrito} : Are you trying to hurt my pride or something? Because I could give fuck all about pride when it comes to making sure the economy of the state and US continues to thrive. The well being of people, legal residents as well, is at stake so sad be it! I'm speaking from a realistic point of view. Your economy, if you live in the US, depends on these people as well.", ">>{TheGoddamnSpiderman} : In addition to the economic argument other people already posted, they're saying they're just not going to help Trump if he tries mass deportations, not that they'll actively prevent federal agents from acting, which California can't do. The reason for policies like this is that if the local illegal immigrant population isn't worried about the local police deporting them they're more likely to be willing speak to the local government about other more serious crimes amongst other things.", ">>{6gentexan} : Well don't look now, but half this country would love to let them in with minimal vetting. And a lot of people(cities, churches, and universities) are already proclaiming they will offer sanctuary. The US was made with immigrants, and I stand behind this 100%. I'm only 1/8 Native American, the rest of my lineage migrated here from other parts of the world. But, it HAS to be done legally...and also times have changed, the process has got to be more strict to ensure our safety... If California or any other state in the US can't handle the economics of losing 11 million illegal immigrants, it's really on the people who have allowed it to get so bad in the first place...it isn't going to get easier if we wait to make the changes...I'm not opposed to letting the illegals that are here now(that are here strictly for a better life) to stay as long as they take ALL the necessary steps to become legal ASAP. If they can't qualify within a certain time frame, then they need to go...come back when you can qualify. I think you'll find that this is exactly what's going to happen. The wall will be built, the illegals that are already here will be vetted, the good ones given a chance, the criminals chucked back over the wall...", ">>{belisaurius} : There is no 'humane removal' solution for 12 million+ people. That's just reality.", '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : Every comment the President or President-Elect makes should be interpreted seriously, unless at an obviously comical event. The PEOTUS\' twitter is not a comical event (well, not intentionally), and so everything he writes there should be assumed to be serious. You don\'t get to excuse his words with "it\'s only a joke, bro!", because the other nations of this world aren\'t going to believe you.', ">>{belisaurius} : Nothing is serious to you unless it agrees with you. Everything that's fucking crazy that he's done isn't 'serious'. How do you feel about the very serious situation that, so far, Trump has only broken promises he made to you?", ">>{IBringYouToBurn} : In short, they are here with the tacit approval of past administrations because they contribute to the economy of the US. Now because the economy is a little tough people think that kicking them out will solve their problems, it won't. It won't bring back manufacturing jobs, or the coal industry, or whatever the problem is in bumfuck Kansas. Personally I would rather live in a Hispanic community than a conservative republican one. Hispanics are a generous and kind people, excluding the bad apples that are a part of all groups of people. PS I didn't necessarily mean you in particular.", ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : > There is no 'humane removal' solution for 12 million+ people. That's just reality. Most would self deport. We'd probably only have to physically deport around 30%.", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Are you trying to hurt my pride or something? Not at all. I was simply saying that that is a sad state of affairs.', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >The reason for policies like this is that if the local illegal immigrant population isn't worried about the local police deporting them they're more likely to be willing speak to the local government about other more serious crimes amongst other things. This is a reasoned response. Thank you", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : Humane in the context of your sentence is subjective. Also, most would likely self deport.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Every comment the President or President-Elect makes should be interpreted seriously, unless at an obviously comical event. Should be to who, to you? Sounds like your opinion. >The PEOTUS\' twitter is not a comical event (well, not intentionally), and so everything he writes there should be assumed to be serious. Again, should be to who? You? >You don\'t get to excuse his words with "it\'s only a joke, bro!", because the other nations of this world aren\'t going to believe you. Speculation. You\'re assuming other nations can\'t tell the difference between serious and non serious words.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Nothing is serious to you unless it agrees with you. Not true. >Everything that\'s fucking crazy that he\'s done isn\'t \'serious\'. "Fucking crazy" is subjective. >How do you feel about the very serious situation that, so far, Trump has only broken promises he made to you? Which promises has he broken that he made to me? Keep in mind that if you may view a promise a serious, whereas I did not.', '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : Fuck me where do I start. >Well don\'t look now, but half this country would love to let them in with minimal vetting. You don\'t have a source for this claim because it doesn\'t exist. The vetting didn\'t decrease in stringency under Obama. >But, it HAS to be done legally...and also times have changed, the process has got to be more strict to ensure our safety... It is already strict. Vetting takes ~7 years. >If California or any other state in the US can\'t handle the economics of losing 11 million illegal immigrants, it\'s really on the people who have allowed it to get so bad in the first place The whole of the US can\'t handle that shock, that\'s the point. This isn\'t about the problems of some far off state; California produces a significant percentage of the US\' food. Crashing their economy crashes the US economy. >as they take ALL the necessary steps to become legal ASAP. If they can\'t qualify within a certain time frame, then they need to go This takes literal years, plural, and that\'s for someone who tried to enter the US legally. Our immigration system is broken, and instead deportation, the liberals want to make it more efficient. No, that does not mean open borders. No, that does not mean less vetting for people from high risk areas. >I think you\'ll find that this is exactly what\'s going to happen...the illegals that are already here will be vetted, the good ones given a chance, This explicitly won\'t happen if Trump follows through on his "deport 11 million" thing. >The wall will be built You people are going to be so disappointed.', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >In short, they are here with the tacit approval of past administrations because they contribute to the economy of the US. Just because they contribute to the economy, doesn't make it okay to be here illegally. >Now because the economy is a little tough people think that kicking them out will solve their problems, it won't. It won't bring back manufacturing jobs, or the coal industry, or whatever the problem is in bumfuck Kansas. I'm not talking about any of that. I'm talking about wanting the people who are here in this country to be here legally. >Hispanics are a generous and kind people, excluding the bad apples that are a part of all groups of people. These are weird generalizations.", '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : It should be because politics doesn\'t work by a hypothetical president TWEETING something along the lines of "we need to deport all of the Asians" or "I want to nuke Saudi Arabia" and then having some PR guy going "It\'s just a joke! He wasn\'t serious!" The reality of international politics is that other countries take the elected representatives of a country\'s government at their word. It\'s how the game has to be played, to ensure other countries can have confidence in you. If you take away that certainty, if anything you say can be construed as not serious, then no country will want to sign anything with you, or negotiate anything with you, or want to have anything to do with you. How will they know they can take you by your word? The international system runs on money, and money runs on trust. You take away that trust and everything falls apart. Every past President knew this. Just because you don\'t doesn\'t make it not so.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >It should be because politics doesn\'t work by a hypothetical president TWEETING something along the lines of "we need to deport all of the Asians" or "I want to nuke Saudi Arabia" and then having some PR guy going "It\'s just a joke! He wasn\'t serious!" I don\'t remember him tweeting either of those things. Those are ridiculoualy hyperbolic examples. Also, if you are unable to tell the difference between someone saying something seriously, and someone saying something not seriously, I don\'t know how to help you. >The reality of international politics is that other countries take the elected representatives of a country\'s government at their word. It\'s how the game has to be played, to ensure other countries can have confidence in you. If you take away that certainty, if anything you say can be construed as not serious, then no country will want to sign anything with you, or negotiate anything with you, or want to have anything to do with you. How will they know they can take you by your word? Most people are able to tell when someone is being serious and when someone is not being serious. Most people have the ability to understand human behavior. I can\'t imagine what life would be like if we didn\'t have the ability to differentiate serious and non serious words and actions.', '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : I said hypothetical president, not Trump. The statements were meant to be ludicrous to highlight the point. Listen, I\'m sorry you don\'t get the basic ideas behind international politics. I\'ll try to explain it through logic, but i have my doubts it will reach you. President of Country A, who has a large air force and means to deploy them thousands of miles away, says through a social media platform (where messages are restricted to 140 characters), that they want to create a no fly zone over Country B. Country B has had some tension with country A in the past, and shares a border with country C, who is an ally of Country A through a treaty under a different President of country A. Country C does not have a strong military due to being smaller than country A. The question is, should Country B and Country C take this comment seriously? Obviously, there are two possible answers; yes, or no. Examine the "yes" answer. Now Country B has to assume the new President of Country A wants to put a no fly zone over their country. They need to take immediate preparations, get people on the phones, begin negotiating. Because of the unofficial nature of the statement\'s release by President of A (due to the President of A not holding regular press conferences), things are especially confusing. Country C sees the military action in country B and begins to get worried. They recall how the President of A had made some very nationalistic, isolationist remarks. Should they try to find other allies? Back to country C. They now are ready for Country A to try an place a no fly zone on them. If that zone materializes, they are prepared. If it never gets put into action, at least they were ready for it. Assume that the first case is a win for them, resulting in a 1. The second case is neither a win nor a loss, resulting in a 0. If they had assumed the President of A was not serious, then they would not have taken action to prepare. If the no fly zone had not materialized, then the result would be the same, if not slightly better. If however, they assumed the comment wasn\'t serious but it actually was, now there is a no fly zone over their country and they were not prepared for it. This is a the worst case scenario for them. The first case is neither a win nor a loss, resulting in a 0. The second case, however, is a unequivocal loss, resulting in a -1. One choice roughly leads to either an outcome of 1, or an outcome of 0. The other choice roughly leads to an outcome of 0, or an outcome of -1. The choice then becomes obvious, right? The point is, other countries HAVE to take what our President says seriously. It\'s how the game of international politics is played. They don\'t have the luxury of saying "oh, he wasn\'t being serious, he was just joking". This process is completely divorced from human nature. It\'s a rational assessment of risk using game theory. You\'re treating the President Elect like he\'s a normal citizen. he isn\'t. he\'s soon to be the Chief Executive, the foremost Ambassador, and the Commander in Chief of the United States. His words represent the US to the rest of the world and he needs to be taken seriously.', ">>{belisaurius} : How do we even have a constructive conversation when you openly tell me that you're entirely fickle in how you treat 'promises'?", ">>{belisaurius} : You seriously think, that 12 million people who went through the effort of getting here illegally would simply turn around and go back? What about the places that, even if their citizens voluntarily came back, won't take them? China absolutely does not want the 2.5 million illegal Chinese citizens back.", ">>{belisaurius} : Are you fucking serious? Why in the world do you think that anyone who is here illegally would 'self deport'? They came here for a reason. More than that, what about the countries that don't want their fleeing citizens back. How are we going to make China take there 2.5 million wayward citizens back? Further, you do realize that 'physically deporting' (at your low estimate) **4 million** people liberally spread around the country is impossible, right? Who would do it? Are we going to have a federal taskforce? Who's spending the money to do this? Where are we putting them? Are we flying them home? What happens if they resist? What happens if actual citizens resist? You ignorant children have spent zero time actually figuring out how to implement your crazy fucking ideas.", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : Promises that are meant to be taken seriously and literally, I take seriously and literally. Promises that are not meant to be taken seriously and literally, I do not take seriously and literally.', ">>{belisaurius} : Who decides whether they are 'meant to be taken' either way? You? Me? Trump? An independent third party? Is there some secret code to which ones are serious and which ones aren't? What happens when you don't take one seriously, but he does? What happens in the reverse? Why, exactly, is it okay with you that your President makes non-serious promises?", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >The question is, should Country B and Country C take this comment seriously? If the comment was made seriously, they should take it seriously. If it was not made seriously, they should not. If that's uncertainty as to whether or not it was made seriously, they should reach out for clarification.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >You seriously think, that 12 million people who went through the effort of getting here illegally would simply turn around and go back? I imagine some would self deport, yes. Not all of course. >What about the places that, even if their citizens voluntarily came back, won't take them? China absolutely does not want the 2.5 million illegal Chinese citizens back. That's a tricky situation. Of course, if they entered the country legally instead of illegally, they wouldn't be facing the situation at all.", '>>{OnlyFactsMatter} : >Why in the world do you think that anyone who is here illegally would \'self deport\'? Fear of deportation. >They came here for a reason. They feel California belongs to Mexico. >How are we going to make China take there 2.5 million wayward citizens back? They will. >Further, you do realize that \'physically deporting\' (at your low estimate) 4 million people liberally spread around the country is impossible, right? It is not impossible. >Who would do it? Are we going to have a federal taskforce? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback Mexico deports more Central/South American illegals than the U.S. does. Question - if someone entered your house without your permission, would you let that person stay or call the police? Or are they just an "undocumented resident" at your house?', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Who decides whether they are 'meant to be taken' either way? You? Me? Trump? An independent third party? Is there some secret code to which ones are serious and which ones aren't? It should be obvious how they are to be taken. If you can't differentiate between something that is meant to be taken seriously, and something that is not, I'm not sure how to help you. >What happens when you don't take one seriously, but he does? What happens in the reverse? Then you have misunderstood him. >Why, exactly, is it okay with you that your President makes non-serious promises? Because I am able to recognize when things are said not seriously, but are said hypothetically, rhetorically, etc. Why would I not be ok with that?", '>>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : The only way for them to know if the comment was made seriously without clarification is if the situation was clearly not serious, such as Obama\'s appearance on "Between Two Ferns". Even then, the President still has to be selective on what they joke about. However, sometimes the nature of the comment means that the time it takes to reach clarification is time lost in preparation if the comment is true. Even then, the President should always be clear with what they say. If a President needs the seriousness of their comments clarified often, that is a significant problem. Finally, you\'re assuming everyone assumes the same way about seriousness, and has the same reactions. Think of a dictator of a small militaristic country. They have a fragile ego and an itchy trigger finger. The President makes a comment about taking military action against them, and does so AGAIN via a tweet. It turns out the comment wasn\'t serious, according to the PR people, but that Dictator has already taken hostage several American businessmen in response to the tweet. That non serious tweet just created a serious international problem. Your putting seriousness through the lens of your day to day interaction with others, and not thinking of it in the larger context of international relations. They don\'t function like how you talk with coworkers, friends, customers, and thus don\'t follow the same rules.', ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : I don't think either of us are going to convince the other of anything, as we're approaching this conversation from completely different mindsets and perceptions.", ">>{belisaurius} : Sure. None of us would be talking about this if we had addressed it earlier (side note: **CLIMATE CHANGE**). But now that we are here, it's irrelevant to talk about 'could have beens'. We have a situation where, in order to 'rid ourselves of illegal immigrants', we would have to force China to take 2.5 million people back. Not just any random *couple million* people either, though. These are people who have lived and worked in a western democracy, sometimes for literally decades. These people are the biggest societal threat China could face in its modern history. Tell me. How are we going to make China take these people back? And if we can't make China do it, exactly how quickly do you think *other* countries are going to hop on board that policy? We are the richest country on Earth, and these people contribute to that. Sending them to poor places, with no ability to absorb these people, while simultaneously fucking our own economy in the ass seems like a pretty shit idea. This, of course, ignoring the fact that we would have to forcibly gather millions of people from all across an entire continent. But here's the even more fun part: a majority of illegal immigrants live in cities (as does a majority of the population in general). What happens when local, American citizens resist your efforts to deport their family? Are we going to start cordoning off cities and systematically searching them? At what point does that cross over from 'Totally Cool American Thing To Do' and into 'Actual Holocaust'? We can all sit around, pondering a happy time when there were no illegal immigrants (hint: that has never been the case). Or we can even rail at our forefathers for giving us this situation (hint: you're taking it in the ass from your GOP forefathers and you're thanking them for it). But what we can't do is pretend that we can *reverse* this situation. It is way too late to do that in a way that wouldn't irrevocably fuck up everything we are.", ">>{HollrHollrGetCholera} : Likely not. I would like to be snide and say I'm approaching this from the established conduct of international politics mindset, but that would be ignoring the possibility of your idea on how it should work gaining traction in the future. Instead, I will just ask you this, since you seem to have a strong sense as to when Trump is being serious or not. Trump has promised, regarding the minimum wage, the following things: 1) Leave the federal minimum wage at $7.25 per hour, which is already too high. 2) Raise the federal minimum wage to $10 per hour, as $7.25 is too low and “the minimum wage has to go up.” 3) Allow states to set their own minimum wage. Now as you can tell, each of these statements contradicts the other two. Only one can actually happen. So, which one was he being serious about, and which two was he ~~lying~~ not being serious about? What should people who support raising the minimum wage assume? What about people who don't support raising the minimum wage?", ">>{belisaurius} : Okay, so since you're unable to really grasp what I'm asking in an objective way; let's move on to concrete examples. Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to jail Hilary Clinton? Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to build a wall? Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to drain the swamp? And, if the answer is 'no' to any of these, what do you say to your fellow Trump voters who very much did believe he was going to do these things? What do you say to the people who have publicly said they feel betrayed by Donald Trump's post election choices?", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to jail Hilary Clinton? No. >Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to build a wall? Yes. >Was Donald Trump serious when he said he was going to drain the swamp? Yes. >And, if the answer is 'no' to any of these, what do you say to your fellow Trump voters who very much did believe he was going to do these things? I'm sorry that they believed he was serious about jailing her. >What do you say to the people who have publicly said they feel betrayed by Donald Trump's post election choices? I'm sorry to hear that.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >Sure. None of us would be talking about this if we had addressed it earlier (side note: **CLIMATE CHANGE**). But now that we are here, it's irrelevant to talk about 'could have beens'. We have a situation where, in order to 'rid ourselves of illegal immigrants', we would have to force China to take 2.5 million people back. Or force them to go through the process to become legal citizens. >Tell me. How are we going to make China take these people back? Not sure. >We can all sit around, pondering a happy time when there were no illegal immigrants (hint: that has never been the case). Or we can even rail at our forefathers for giving us this situation (hint: you're taking it in the ass from your GOP forefathers and you're thanking them for it). But what we can't do is pretend that we can *reverse* this situation. It is way too late to do that in a way that wouldn't irrevocably fuck up everything we are. Force them to go through the process to become legal citizens?", ">>{belisaurius} : What is an appropriate time frame on the wall promise? When does it become an unfulfilled promise? And your opinion of 'swamp draining' is to appoint a slew of lobbyists and billionaires to the highest echelons of government? You seem to have zero concern for the consequences of Trump's actions on your fellow citizens, or your fellow Trump voters.", ">>{belisaurius} : What would that process entail? Because, I assure you, if there were any avenue open for these people to become legal citizens in a way that doesn't overtly disrupt their lives, they would do it in a heartbeat. You do realize that what you're asking for is normally called a 'path to citizenship' and it's usually a democratic position?", '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : On that specific issue, I would say that he was being serious about all of those statements, and his stance on minimum wage is not currently locked down, his stance is changing and evolving as time goes on.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >What is an appropriate time frame on the wall promise? I don\'t think there\'s a real answer to this. Too subjective. >When does it become an unfulfilled promise? When he definitely says that no wall in any form will ever be built, and that building a wall is no longer part of his platform. >And your opinion of \'swamp draining\' is to appoint a slew of lobbyists and billionaires to the highest echelons of government? Billionaires have nothing to do with the swamp, and never have. "Draining the swamp" refers to a political establishment, not a wealth establishment. What percent of his cabinet picks are lobbyists? A big part of his plan to drain the swamp is his plan for ethics reform. https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trumps-five-point-plan-for-ethics-reform >You seem to have zero concern for the consequences of Trump\'s actions on your fellow citizens, or your fellow Trump voters. I have concerns for all of those things. However, I also live in the real world, and know that no matter what Trump does, some of my fellow citizens as well as my fellow Trump supporters will be unhappy. You can\'t satisfy 100% of the people 100% of the time.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >What would that process entail? Not sure. >Because, I assure you, if there were any avenue open for these people to become legal citizens in a way that doesn\'t overtly disrupt their lives, they would do it in a heartbeat. Define "overtly disrupt their lives." I would, for example, want them to pay any taxes that they would have been legally obligated to pay had they been living here legally. There should also be some kind of additional form of required repayment. Paying a one-time fee for entering the country and living here illegally, having to spend some time serving in the military, etc. >You do realize that what you\'re asking for is normally called a \'path to citizenship\' and it\'s usually a democratic position? Does the democratic position align with what I said above? That is, making them pay any taxes that should have paid plus some additional form of required repayment for entering and living here illegally?', '>>{a57782} : We have representation. "No taxation without representation" was literal. The colonies had literally no representation at all. No other state in the country has as many representatives as California. We have 53 in the house of Reps, the next closest state is Texas at 32. Still, putting a 35% tariff on California isn\'t going to happen. Constitutionally it\'s banned.', '>>{belisaurius} : By and large, yes actually it does. You certainly do not have an opinion in line with anyone on the Trump side of the political spectrum. What is somewhat concerning is that you don\'t already know this? How was this not something you looked into before you voted? Be that as it may, I do have a question about what you\'ve proposed: currently, the only taxes that illegal immigrants don\'t pay are federal income taxes. They contribute to social security, they pay all excise taxes you and I pay (sales tax, road tolls, etc). In addition, the vast majority of illegal immigrants are in a wealth bracket that would lead to zero income taxes at either the state or federal level. So, in reality, they \'owe\' us nothing. They\'ve been contributing to our economy and our tax base for *free* for *decades*. It\'s actually, theoretically \'better\' for us as a country to continue having \'two tiers\' of residents. "Citizens" who get the benefits and "legal workers" who get nothing. So, what exactly, do these law abiding, tax paying, 12+ million people owe us, exactly?', '>>{PM_ME_UR_SHOES_GIRL} : The Electoral College disenfranchises us and we should have more representatives based on our population.', '>>{StarDestinyGuy} : >By and large, yes actually it does. Can you show me then? >You certainly do not have an opinion in line with anyone on the Trump side of the political spectrum. I\'d much rather they be deported, but if deportation is proven truly impossible, some other kind of deal could be made. >What is somewhat concerning is that you don\'t already know this? How was this not something you looked into before you voted? These questions tie to the "can you show me" question above. >Be that as it may, I do have a question about what you\'ve proposed: currently, the only taxes that illegal immigrants don\'t pay are federal income taxes. They contribute to social security, they pay all excise taxes you and I pay (sales tax, road tolls, etc). What about illegal immigrants who are paid in cash? >In addition, the vast majority of illegal immigrants are in a wealth bracket that would lead to zero income taxes at either the state or federal level. So, in reality, they \'owe\' us nothing. They\'ve been contributing to our economy and our tax base for *free* for *decades*. It\'s actually, theoretically \'better\' for us as a country to continue having \'two tiers\' of residents. "Citizens" who get the benefits and "legal workers" who get nothing. So, what exactly, do these law abiding, tax paying, 12+ million people owe us, exactly? Reparations for violating the law and entering the country, as well as living here, illegally.', '>>{HoldingTheFire} : Most would do it legally if them was a path available.', ">>{belisaurius} : [From the White House Website:](https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/immigration/earned-citizenship) >We have to deal with the 11 million individuals who are here illegally. We all agree that these men and women should have to earn their way to citizenship. But for comprehensive immigration reform to work, it must be clear from the outset that there is a pathway to citizenship. We’ve got to lay out a path — a process that includes passing a background check, paying taxes, paying a penalty, learning English, and then going to the back of the line, behind all the folks who are trying to come here legally. That's only fair. I think that's a pretty clean summary of what you're asking for. I happen to think that extracting reparations from the poorest among us is an exercise in futility, but that's just me.", ">>{StarDestinyGuy} : >We have to deal with the 11 million individuals who are here illegally. We all agree that these men and women should have to earn their way to citizenship. But for comprehensive immigration reform to work, it must be clear from the outset that there is a pathway to citizenship. We’ve got to lay out a path — a process that includes passing a background check, paying taxes, **paying a penalty**, learning English, and then going to the back of the line, behind all the folks who are trying to come here legally. That's only fair. What does the penalty entail? >I think that's a pretty clean summary of what you're asking for. I happen to think that extracting reparations from the poorest among us is an exercise in futility, but that's just me. Reparations doesn't necessarily mean money. Could also mean forcing a few years of service in the military, for example.", ">>{belisaurius} : I'm pretty sure that the military wouldn't want anything to do with these people. The average age of an illegal immigrant is in the upper 30s. I'm also not sure who would enforce any 'mandatory' anything. But that's a question that could be answered in bipartisan discussion of what exactly a 'penalty' would be. But that's the important thing: a cogent discussion between parties about an appropriate long term solution to immigration in the United States. That doesn't happen because the GOP has such a hardline stance on this. Which you apparently don't agree with in the slightest.", '>>{6gentexan} : Seriously??? Lol the source is the facts! There are already roughly 11 MILLION illegal aliens in this country already...and there are ALOT of people willing to just instantly turn them into citizens...:and how about the terrorist that hit OSU?? they were "vetted" but apparently the vetting process isn\'t as strict as you claim....therefore if you are comfortable with how things are, I\'m MORE than willing to let them go live in YOUR neighborhood', ">>{sbhikes} : I think California should withhold its strawberries, avocados, peaches, almonds, honey and wine from the red states. I'm sure China would be happy to pick up the slack.", '>>{t-reddit} : Of course they will fight Trump on this. Because without undocumented immigrants California\'s economy would fall apart. And in other news, we in "liberal" California 1) support the death penalty 2) do not provide universal health care and 3) do not give a shit about our homeless problem.', '>>{DrinkVictoryGin} : The point is that it would be shooting ourselves in the foot to deport the migrant farmworkers who do the back breaking work of picking our crops.', '>>{DrinkVictoryGin} : We have always had an immigrant underclass to do the backbreaking work that citizens don\'t want to do. It would be self-defeating to deport the laborers who pick our fruits and vegetables. We need people to do that work. California is a highly agricultural state. This isn\'t about defending "illegals". Its about protecting farmers\' incomes and our food supply.', ">>{cheapStryker} : I live in California, we have about 10 to 15 million illegal immigrants from Mexico. I'm not saying deport them all, but how many more do we need to pick fruit?"], ['>>{ragekage117} : At Greenville, N.C. rally, Trump accuses the US Military of murdering "astronomical" numbers of civilians and covering it up', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : This couldnt have been off a teleprompter could it?', ">>{NebraskaWeedOwner} : I knew it. The motherfucker couldn't wait to get on the podium when he saw he was actually polling ahead of Clinton in a poll.", '>>{2ndprize} : They actually killed tons of US citizens tons folks. They fought an entire war against other Americans. Good taxpayers slave owning Americans', ">>{RobespierrewasRight} : There is a massive difference in saying there's been an astronomical number of deaths in the middle east over the last decade and that the US' actions there helped contribute to things cooking off and what the submission title is claiming Trump said. It's like some dude in a Nascar race tapping the bumper of a guy he's trying to pass and setting off a chain-reaction of crashes and claiming he was driving full-speed in the wrong direction and purposely slammed into the herd head-on like anyone who's played a Nascar simulator has done at least once.", '>>{ragekage117} : You know they blow up a city, and claim two people were wounded, alright? You know the real numbers, OK. The real numbers are astronomical. Astronomical. Nope. He was doing exactly that.', '>>{ragekage117} : Now, back to my suggestion that we kill the families of suspected militants.', '>>{Dan_The_Manimal} : Not to defend Trump but they do kind of do that. An enemy combatant on drone missions is defined as any male over a certain age. So "civilian deaths" are literally just women and children. If they accidentally bombed a wedding, the bride would be a civilian casualty and the groom would be an enemy combatant. But what he said is just dumb. They\'re lying about who is dying, not how many.', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : If you are a Republican candidate for President you kind of have to bet on having a large percentage of the military and "law and order" vote to have a shot. And true or not, Bush or Obama Administration (or any other Administration during war) the last thing you probably wanna say is that they callously killed huge numbers of citizens, because there is no WAY to spin it as pro-troops.', '>>{satosaison} : Yeah. As a good liberal, as much as I wanna hate on trump, he is correct. The US military murdered tens of thousands of civilians in Iraw and Afghanistan, and continues to cause civilian casualties through our drone wars. But plenty will argue saying it is somehow "unpatriotic," the same way that protesting police violence against blacks is somehow "anti-cop."', ">>{F22Rapture} : Yeah, he's not necessarily wrong about this one.", '>>{RobespierrewasRight} : They and "the people" are really pretty ambiguous, and while he does bring up "both sides" the particulars of that could be anything from "the US military is underreporting civilian casualties" which is a legit problem to what the submission title claims. The fact that he\'s an absolutely horrible public speaker really isn\'t helping trying to make any fucking sense of what he\'s saying at all any easier, but unless he literally claimed the US military was murdering astronomical numbers of civilians it\'s ridiculous to take a rambling patchwork of statements and claim them to be such (though to be fair, he ~~did actually make a more concise claim that the US military has blood on its hands from~~ actually said he\'d have the military massacre civilians related to terrorists earlier this year, which were the results that popped up when I tried to find articles about this recent rally).', '>>{IrishJoe} : Hope those 88 former military leaders are happy now!', '>>{_tx} : Does he really think attacking the military is a good idea?', '>>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : In all seriousness, this dude is a draft dodger who claimed that his personal Vietnam was not catching the clap in night clubs in the 70\'s. He suggested that POWs are not war heroes because "he likes people who weren\'t captured." He says he knows "more about ISIS than the generals do" somehow, by being a real estate developer in Manhattan. He says that the Military is essentially a kill squad of untold innocent civilians. How can this person possibly serve as Commander In Chief?', ">>{ragekage117} : The military managed to cover up Pat Tilman's death (or rather the nature of it) for all of what, a few months ? I don't believe they could cover up a massacring a whole city for a weekend.", '>>{aiken_} : A while ago I would have agreed, but I am over the "we can\'t blame him for what he says because he doesn\'t make enough sense to be sure of exactly what he meant" thing. He seems to clearly be saying that: * There is a lot of death on both sides * "They" blow up a city and report two people wounded, but we know the real numbers are astronomical * The U.S. started the whole thing * We are going to solve the ISIS problem * To solve the ISIS problem we have to get back and solve it strongly and swiftly * We also have to rebuild the US because is going to hell * The US infrastructure is a disaster There is no reasonable interpretation of "they" blowing up cities and massively undercounting casualties other than the US, or the Obama administration. Maybe he really meant that ISIS claims fewer injuries than they inflict, and he doesn\'t know that they are notorious for seeking maximum publicity for the harm they do, so it makes it look like he\'s talking about the US. But I don\'t believe that.', '>>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Have a downvote for being that guy who has to comment on his report.', ">>{aiken_} : I would be so incredibly impressed if he stood up and said that clearly. And it would be a patriotic thing to do. Instead, he's doing the word salad thing where people want to support him can select the meaning they prefer -- either he's acknowledging a lot of civilian deaths and is therefore a straight shooter and patriotic, or he's saying nothing of the sort and therefore doesn't need to be censured for being unpatriotic.", '>>{ragekage117} : You mean like when he said US soldiers stole pallets of money? Sorry someone said something true and inconvenient about your Messiah.'], [">>{Berniecanuck} : It's Time For An Emergency Jobs Program - A Green New Deal", ">>{drew418} : 20 million jobs by transitioning to green energy? Who the hell do you think you're kidding? Why not offer magic unicorns and flying ponies at this point?", '>>{1DFanBoi} : Is this an official campaign ad or a student film? Dogshit either way.', ">>{PlaaaaasticJesuuuuus} : Yeah, I'm sure Trump will get right on it when he gets into office courtesy of the Spoiler-in-Chief here.", '>>{guiltyofnothing} : /r/homeopathy or /r/gmohysteria or /r/lexingtoncitycouncil would be better for this.', ">>{KatiePuss} : She'd be lucky to get .5% of the vote, don't worry about her spoiling anything.", ">>{riritried4whitedick} : You will not have a successful broadscope social program as long as the borders are open. Full stop. It's basic math not partisan politics. The program will be crushed by sheer numbers. Current job counts and pay are already being effected by immigration. E.G. 8 million jobs have been created since 2008. not only is this abysmal as thats the exact number loss from the collapse meaning theres been no net gain since even though we added more workers, but 3 Million of those jobs went to illegal immigrants. So we actually have a 3 Million job deficit unadjusted for new workers entering the work force, 8 years after the economic collapse The biggest boon to the poor and middle class would be the deportation of illegal immigrants. Illegal Immigration represents a 250 billion dollar a year wealth transfer out of the middle class and poor", '>>{Berniecanuck} : If you are going to make claims like this you are going to have to provide sources', ">>{Berniecanuck} : Smearing people doesn't make the smear true. It just makes you look bad.", ">>{guiltyofnothing} : Once again, why are Stein's supporters so ashamed of her positions and her party's platform -- or her only experience as an elected official?", ">>{Berniecanuck} : Not at all ashamed, you should read the platform, it's great! I talk about her elected experience all the time. Municipal government work is very very important. Hillary doesn't have any municipal experience, that's why she doesn't know how to connect with people.", '>>{Berniecanuck} : You have to have the guts to fight for it.', ">>{Berniecanuck} : Magic unicorns and flying ponies is what the Ds and Rs have been offering for years and look where we're at. I'll take the green new deal thanks!", '>>{Berniecanuck} : Both Trump and Clinton are spoiled rotten. #avoteforclintonisavotefortrump #avotefortrumpisavoteforclinton'], ['>>{lapone1} : ‘It will be a bloodbath’: Inside the Kansas militia plot to ignite a religious war', '>>{SplatteredRug} : Whoa this is some deplorable stuff coming out of Kansas. Here comes the charge of the spite brigade! Theirs is not to reason. Why?', ">>{DeniseDeNephew} : Religious war. Why are so many religious people so willing to murder other people? Shouldn't religion get that hatred out of them?", '>>{HIGHx1000000NRG} : Trump blaming this on Obama and Clinton in 4, 3, 2, 1....', '>>{The-Autarkh} : Submitted a story about this yesterday, but it was classified as "off topic" (not directly relevant to US Politics). I hope this story stays up because it is highly relevant. In any event: Here\'s [the actual criminal complaint](https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/kansasplot-complaint.pdf). At least two of the three alleged domestic terrorists appear to be Trump supporters based on their social media posts: [Curtis Allen](http://www.politicususa.com/2016/10/14/men-arrested-plot-car-bomb-mosque-trump-supporter.html) [Patrick Stein](https://mobile.twitter.com/TheRealRondaLee/status/787090534007443456/photo/1) As former NSA Director Michael Hayden said: >You get to a certain point in this business, **you’re not just responsible for what you say, you are responsible for what people hear.** ------------- For purposes of discussion, here\'s the definition of **domestic terrorism** codified at [18 U.S.C. § 2331(5)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331): >(5) the term domestic terrorism means activities that— >(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; >(B) appear to be intended— >(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; >(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or >(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and >(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. --------- Also relevant, for those wanting to consider theoretical frameworks for understanding the ethno-nationalist resentment fueling this sort of violence and powering Trump\'s campaign: [**1**](http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/donald-trump-hate-groups-neo-nazi-white-supremacist-racism) [**2**](http://www.vox.com/2016/9/19/12933072/far-right-white-riot-trump-brexit)', ">>{oldoneeyed} : Mark my words, if Clinton wins these maniacs are going to start killing people. They've been looking for an excuse since the 90's, *really* started looking once a black guy got into office, and now they are starting to feel like the time's at hand. Trump's not helping by whipping massive portions of the republican base into a paranoid frenzy. He's giving these maniacs an opportunity to recruit and inject their views into mainstream discourse. People are going to start dying the moment Trump loses.", ">>{cybercuzco} : >Sometimes he rode alone, sometimes he would have the confidential informant drive him. Our confidential informant, Lisa S. No no, that's too obvious, let's call her L. Simpson. So the guy knows exactly who ratted him out now.", ">>{prototype7} : They are not militia, the state's militia is the National Guard. These people are terrorists...one might go so far as to call them Radical Christian Terrorists....as I have heard from the Republican party's denouncements of Pres. Obama for not referring to terrorists who are muslim as Radical Muslim Terrorists...", '>>{quantum_gambade} : > “Make sure if you start using your bow on them cockroaches, make sure you dip them in pig’s blood before you shoot them,” I wonder where they got that idea? [Oh, right.](http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=92502&siteSection=site_section_id&videoId=30378078)', ">>{Blue_Team4President} : After the election, we need to quietly take down the savagely stupid alt-reich media apparatus that's fueling this stupidity.", ">>{Pvt_Larry} : Oh that informant has been whisked away by now I'm sure.", '>>{Granadafan} : The Christian Taliban strikes again. Where are the moderate Christians condemning these Trump supporters?', ">>{19thugnasty94} : Nothing pisses people off more than disagreeing with something they can't prove.", ">>{mcstutteringbuddha} : Radical white christian extremist terrorists. If you don't say it, you can't fight it.", ">>{mcstutteringbuddha} : If Trump were President, he'd bomb the shit out of these terrorists, amirite?", '>>{SeanECE} : Remind me 24 days I want you to be wrong, I want you to be wrong......', ">>{Tafkaharambe} : I mean there's a lot of atheists. That's like saying why are so many black people gang affiliated. Shouldn't their past make them want to all love in harmony?", '>>{thebearcredentials} : Too much hate and too many guns in this country', '>>{Meatsim1} : I hope they ask the candidates what they think about this during the debate', '>>{buzzlightlime} : >"militia" It\'s a terrorist cell. Literally nothing about this action distinguishes it from any other terrorist act except the skin colour of the perpetrators', ">>{canteloupy} : I think the group was pretty small they already know. Like it was the one who didn't get charged.", '>>{gumbii87} : Um. Violent crime. Gun crime more specifically. Gun murders and violent crime are both at their lowest levels in nearly half a century they. Despite there being more guns in circulation now than ever before.', '>>{thebearcredentials} : Where? Are you talking about crime where the perpetrator are caught? Are you talking about crime not related to gun violence? And what is the source for your claim?', '>>{gumbii87} : No. Just about all types. Homicide stands out more than others but statistically, violent crime in the US has been on steady decline since the early 1990s. https://www.statista.com/statistics/191219/reported-violent-crime-rate-in-the-usa-since-1990/ https://mises.org/blog/fbi-us-homicide-rate-51-year-low https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/violent-crime/violent-crime-topic-page/violentcrimemain_final']]

classify and reply

['>>{zampe} : What the Mylan Epipen Scandal Tells Us About American Capitalism', ">>{JathonVoorheeth} : Monopolies, especially in the pharmaceutical industry, shouldn't be allowed to exist.", '>>{ambientlozenge} : It tells us NOTHING about any capitalism anywhere. It tells us that the US has weird rules for pharmaceuticals.', ">>{ambientlozenge} : They give companies monopolies on certain medications without giving them any sort of requirements on price. Meaning that once you have the monopoly, you can hike up the price as much as you want. That's completely absurd.", '>>{truthhurts4444} : The CEO of Mylan is the daughter of democratic senator Joe Manchin and a Clinton Foundation donor. Facts', '>>{_Dr_Pie_} : Facts with no real relation. Go back to your bubble with your unfounded conspiracy theories.', ">>{S3PANG} : What theories? They literally just stated several facts. That's it. You implied the theories and ridiculousness of them.", '>>{probablyagiven} : Unfounded? Should one of us waste the time to put together all of the Clinton Foundation donors conflicts of interest in one easy to navigate spot?', '>>{RooftopBBQ} : Otters sometimes have a favourite pet rock. Fact. Was this correct? Yes. Was there a point to this? No. In fact, unless someone asks a question like "Do some animals have pet rocks?", there is literally no reason to just randomly state a fact.... ...Unless you want to use those facts to imply something. In this case, /u/truthhurts4444 is very clearly implying that there is some sort of link between the questionable business practices of the Mylan CEO and the senator/clinton foundation. Yes, he\'s not saying it outright, but because we here all understand english and have the reading comprehension of at least a 10 year old, the meaning of what he wrote is nevertheless crystal clear. If you\'re not seeing that, I suggest going back to public school for reading comprehension lessons.', '>>{Anchorbaby1988} : It certainly says something about unregulated, liaise-faire capitalism in the pharmaceutical industry', ">>{ambientlozenge} : State enforced monopolies is the **opposite** of an unregulated laissez-faire capitalism. So, no it doesn't.", '>>{ambientlozenge} : In the 2011–12 season Stelios Malezas was the top scorer for PAOK FC! Facts', ">>{Anchorbaby1988} : De-regulation and a high barrier of entry is what has caused these monopolies; they're not state enforced, the state just looks the other way. If you leave pharmaceutical companies unregulated, they will bring every sort of human suffering and misery to justify greater and greater profits, and greater and greater monopolization.", ">>{ambientlozenge} : No, that's not deregulation, and YES is is state enforced.", ">>{Anchorbaby1988} : So could you explain how the free market will prevent pharmaceuticals from developing treatments instead of cures? How will the free market prevent monopolies? How would the free market consider the voluntary choices of unconscious or mentally ill patients that can't make rational choices?", ">>{ambientlozenge} : Do you even understand what we are discussing? Let me quote from the article: > jacking up the price of Epipens. Try again. The rest of the questions are stupid, I'm sure you can find an answer by actually reading something on the topic.", ">>{_Dr_Pie_} : No you shouldn't. Because you would list every remotely possible conflict of interest. Without putting forth any factual evidence of a single conflict of interest. Just because there is a possibility. Does not mean that there is. Document a single actual conflict of interest that has occurred and is a problem. And you will have a new story. it does not matter how Shady Clinton is. I'm sure there could be possible conflicts of interest in your life. Should we start speculating on them?"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{zampe} : What the Mylan Epipen Scandal Tells Us About American Capitalism', ">>{JathonVoorheeth} : Monopolies, especially in the pharmaceutical industry, shouldn't be allowed to exist.", '>>{ambientlozenge} : It tells us NOTHING about any capitalism anywhere. It tells us that the US has weird rules for pharmaceuticals.', ">>{ambientlozenge} : They give companies monopolies on certain medications without giving them any sort of requirements on price. Meaning that once you have the monopoly, you can hike up the price as much as you want. That's completely absurd.", '>>{truthhurts4444} : The CEO of Mylan is the daughter of democratic senator Joe Manchin and a Clinton Foundation donor. Facts', '>>{_Dr_Pie_} : Facts with no real relation. Go back to your bubble with your unfounded conspiracy theories.', ">>{S3PANG} : What theories? They literally just stated several facts. That's it. You implied the theories and ridiculousness of them.", '>>{probablyagiven} : Unfounded? Should one of us waste the time to put together all of the Clinton Foundation donors conflicts of interest in one easy to navigate spot?', '>>{RooftopBBQ} : Otters sometimes have a favourite pet rock. Fact. Was this correct? Yes. Was there a point to this? No. In fact, unless someone asks a question like "Do some animals have pet rocks?", there is literally no reason to just randomly state a fact.... ...Unless you want to use those facts to imply something. In this case, /u/truthhurts4444 is very clearly implying that there is some sort of link between the questionable business practices of the Mylan CEO and the senator/clinton foundation. Yes, he\'s not saying it outright, but because we here all understand english and have the reading comprehension of at least a 10 year old, the meaning of what he wrote is nevertheless crystal clear. If you\'re not seeing that, I suggest going back to public school for reading comprehension lessons.', '>>{Anchorbaby1988} : It certainly says something about unregulated, liaise-faire capitalism in the pharmaceutical industry', ">>{ambientlozenge} : State enforced monopolies is the **opposite** of an unregulated laissez-faire capitalism. So, no it doesn't.", '>>{ambientlozenge} : In the 2011–12 season Stelios Malezas was the top scorer for PAOK FC! Facts', ">>{Anchorbaby1988} : De-regulation and a high barrier of entry is what has caused these monopolies; they're not state enforced, the state just looks the other way. If you leave pharmaceutical companies unregulated, they will bring every sort of human suffering and misery to justify greater and greater profits, and greater and greater monopolization.", ">>{ambientlozenge} : No, that's not deregulation, and YES is is state enforced.", ">>{Anchorbaby1988} : So could you explain how the free market will prevent pharmaceuticals from developing treatments instead of cures? How will the free market prevent monopolies? How would the free market consider the voluntary choices of unconscious or mentally ill patients that can't make rational choices?", ">>{ambientlozenge} : Do you even understand what we are discussing? Let me quote from the article: > jacking up the price of Epipens. Try again. The rest of the questions are stupid, I'm sure you can find an answer by actually reading something on the topic.", ">>{_Dr_Pie_} : No you shouldn't. Because you would list every remotely possible conflict of interest. Without putting forth any factual evidence of a single conflict of interest. Just because there is a possibility. Does not mean that there is. Document a single actual conflict of interest that has occurred and is a problem. And you will have a new story. it does not matter how Shady Clinton is. I'm sure there could be possible conflicts of interest in your life. Should we start speculating on them?"]]

classify and reply

[">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Trump tops Clinton in TV ratings for convention speeches: 'We beat her'", ">>{JoshuaZ1} : I like how when he was losing on the first two convention nights he dismissed it and said he wasn't responsible for the convention, but when his ratings are higher on the last night that means that he had a part in beating her.", ">>{RandomCanucklehead} : I tuned in just to see if he'd mocked the disabled, accuse Hillary of bleeding from her 'wherever', shit on more POWs, offer to arm the Saudis with nukes, point to his African American, or talk about how big his penis is again. Sadly, all I got was the syphilitic ramblings of angry old orange who truly believes he's a one-man show. I was disappoint.", ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : I'm not sure what you're getting at. Wo what the rating weren't as good as the Dems the first two nights? All that matters is the last two, where the most prominent speakers were for both conventions, including the nominees. Almost 3 million more people tuned in for the last two days of the republican convention than the dem convention. That's a huge jump in terms of ratings.", '>>{JoshuaZ1} : [Data](http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/democratic-national-convention-ratings-night-one-dnc-beats-rnc-bernie-sanders-michelle-obama-1201823682/). [Trump whining about said data](http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/donald-trump-republican-national-convention-poor-ratings).', '>>{WildAnimus} : Obama puts North Atlantic zone off-limits to drilling, fishing', '>>{jcw4455} : Obama really is going through his Fuck it list.', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : I only tuned into the Democratic National Convnetion to see if they covered the massive collusion with the media and corruption in the election process. Sadly, all I got was the pandering of a Compulsive liar and massively Incompetent nominee who truly believes people think she and the DNC aren't corrupt. I was disappoint.", ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : I still don't get your point. He still had better ratings the last two nights. The last two nights are the most important anyway. Sure, he was disappointed with the first two nights ratings, but I'm not sure why you are bringing it up. Funny how Mother Jones didn't write a shit-their article about how 3 million more people tuned into the RNC the last 2 nights.", '>>{kiarra33} : Yay! Finally some positive news, good ol Obama :)', '>>{SRW90} : Trump attorney general pick Jeff Sessions said immigrants in the U.S. military might be spies', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Shhhh. Delete this. I Don't want you to get banned.", '>>{gonetosea} : If you include PBS and C-SPAN, Hillary had more viewers than Trump. Include streaming video, it was a landslide for Hillary. This is just like the landslide victory Hillary will have in November.', '>>{chillymtnman} : and whistle-blowers are terrorists, U.S. military service is a route immigrants can take for citizenship....', ">>{Novae_Blue} : It's funny how this sort of thing will be completely negated if the TPP passes.", ">>{mrdominoe} : Oh great. So now they won't be able to use the military to prove their support for the United States? How in the hell is anyone supposed to enter this country if you won't let them do anyth... oh wait... that's EXACTLY what they want.", '>>{safeway7} : Good. Fish is too expensive and we need to make it cheaper.', ">>{JoshuaZ1} : The point is that when Trump the convention poorly he blamed other people. When the convention did well he congratulated himself. I'm curious, will you at least acknowledge the basic factual issue that the RNC ratings for the first two nights were not as good as the DNC ratings for their first two nights?", ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : Does anybody pro-Trump actually think Sessions should be AG? If so, why? Edit: I mean most lawyers are conservative and you can't find a better one than Sessions?", '>>{wstsdr} : Next week on "*let\'s scare the base*" we\'ll discuss how immigrants might be smuggling in a dangerous new type of cancer.', ">>{muffler48} : Because people like to watch train wrecks in the works. Being the best ratings doesn't mean the best thing.", ">>{arcxa} : It doesn't matter how you start, it matters how you finish.", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Did I not acknowledge it? This article says that he said "**We** did it." He never said "I did it." So, he did not congratulate himself, he congratulated everyone who had a part in it.', ">>{ThatsPresTrumpForYou} : The fishers have 7 years to find new waters, and it's an executive order. Basically it will be reversed on the 9th of November.", ">>{wwarnout} : Great. Let's turn our military personnel against each other. What a fucking idiot.", ">>{Jas9191} : Just curious how does this make fish cheaper? I support him doing this but doesnt this make less space for fishing available? I would assume it'll change the behavior of some species and they'll use that area as a refuge in the future - do you think this will increase fish populations which will reduce costs?", ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : Okay, but you really didn't answer my question. Why Sessions specifically? Any conservative Trump-appointed AG would likely address immigration to your liking.", '>>{Jas9191} : The fish industry is eating itself alive if anything this will help them by creating a place that over time fish will begin to use as a refuge for breeding.', ">>{Brodusgus} : The goal is to help the farm raised fish industry. With climate change comes different breeding grounds for wild caught fish. There isn't a sanctuary, just an off limit zone. Catch limits have been reduced. Seasonal products like shrimp and lobster are cut back because where you normally find them has been affected by warming waters.", '>>{SRW90} : A lot of them [were not happy](https://np.reddit.com/r/EnoughTrumpSpam/comments/5dp2sk/slug/da6bw6n) with the announcement.', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Yeah. Great choice there, guys. Truly. A forward thinking AG for a new era right here, boy-o let me tell you...', ">>{therealhood} : So... you're basically ready to compromise everything you believe in just for not accepting any immigrants into the country?", ">>{Jas9191} : Idk I think we still need to cut back on fishing wild caught fish. Pacific Tuna is down to like 6% of its prefished population and many other species are right along with it. My buddy fishes Salmon in Alaska all summer and this was their worst year simply because of a lack of fish. It's getting scary.", ">>{____yourcouch} : You are aware the US has no cohesive culture right? it's an immigrant culture by definition. your argument is nonsensical, but I applaud your earnest attempt to try to dress up your xenophobia. This is the new white nationalism, folks. some of them went to school and learned how to word their racist and xenophobic bullshit in more pleasant terms.", '>>{helpmesleep666} : My uncle is super conservative voted Trump. "Session is a fucking idiot". I could tell he feels a bit betrayed. Also we\'re Jews.. I totally forgot to bring up Bannon.', ">>{helpmesleep666} : So anyone but Chris Christie? That's like.. a lot of people.", ">>{jasonzimmy} : This is Trump's version of winning. Don't care about substance, I got better ratings thus I must be right. Not good.", ">>{Brodusgus} : It's really scary that an ecosystem that relies on certain conditions just can't survive in traditional waters anymore. It's not that the fish aren't there due to over fishing, it's more they have to be in habitats that help them survive. Breeding grounds are moving to more suitable waters where the temperature is optimal.", ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : What substance? The DNC speakers had celebrities and unrealistic visions of the state of the US and the World. The RNC speakers were politicians and pastors. They were war Heros and authors. They were his family members. They painted a realistic state of the US and the World. They didn't ignore radical Islam or rising crime rates.", ">>{helpmesleep666} : >I went to private schools :D ! No you live in a private bubble.. I went to private school too, my world views aren't xenophobic.. that's not an excuse.", '>>{Jas9191} : Ahh I see, that is scary. Even scarier really. Its a lot harder to reverse climate change than to just stop fishing (like actually accomplishing not politically or economically)', '>>{Writerhaha} : More Dems streamed then Republicans. The overall numbers equal out.', ">>{helpmesleep666} : >I don't like multiculturalism and everything that comes with it. I like experiencing other cultures in their respective countries. lmfao", ">>{walter_neft} : And when you don't count online streams, the numbers are entirely innaccurate of actual views!", ">>{PMC_KC} : You're insane, we're not a nation of Immigrants, we're a nation of Settlers that is mostly British with a little Dutch mixed in. You might say our country and constitution were built around those values.", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Trust me, the DNC was more of a train wreck. Almost 100,000 people outside were protesting the nominee. Thousands of people inside were booing speakers and booing Hillary. They had white noise machines to block them out and had counter chants. The camera never showed the protesters outside and inside. They were actively censoring the protesting. Bernie had to email his supporters and tel them not to boo people, but they still did. Meanwhile at the RNC, they booed the hell out of Ted Cruz for not endorsing, likely ending his political career. They also covered the degenerates protesting outside. They had one uprising but it was 50-100 people out of thousands that attempted to win a vocal vote by screaming at the top of their lungs. They were properly booed and the vocal vote was changed to a roll call, where the never Trumpers got blown the fuck out.', ">>{____yourcouch} : we are an immigrant nation, so our culture is by definition immigrant. Unless you're contending native culture is dominant, there is no culture here that must be preserved in a bubble. all the greatest parts of our culture, from jazz to rock and roll, to film, and cuisine borrow from Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. you may have gone to private school (as did I, although mine was no bubble) but that doesn't mean you're educated.", ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : It says in the article that CSPAN was not counted, I'm not sure about PBS.", '>>{h3rring} : > white noise machine Dude... it was a wi-fi antenna. Go back to /r/conspiracy ASAP.', ">>{____yourcouch} : lol, that's like the pot calling the silverware black. That's some nice projection on the insane bit of you seriously are crazy enough to neglect the huge African and Asian influence on our culture. This is the white nationalist racism we're talking about folks :)", ">>{Meetchel} : I think single issue voters in general tend to be selfish and only think of themselves. At least you own it though, I guess. The general voting populace *should* be thinking not only of themselves but of their country. I'm a relatively wealthy 35 year old single white man and will likely not have children, yet compassion towards others pushes me away from my own self-interests; I have always voted liberal and will continue to do so despite the fact it may not be to my personal benefit.", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : https://youtu.be/vf5ZkGKk9SM Any proof that it was a wifi router? There is plenty of proof that it was white noise.', ">>{h3rring} : http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/antenna/installation/guide/ant2513p4mn.pdf If you're seriously wondering why you couldn't hear any protests during Hillary's speech, read this informative article: https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/why-america-couldnt-hear-or-see-bernie-protesters-during-hil", ">>{helpmesleep666} : I don't know I tried to tell him that the entire time.", '>>{JoshuaZ1} : > Did I not acknowledge it? Glad we have that factual bit established then. > So, he did not congratulate himself, he congratulated everyone who had a part in it. You are correct. So what happened was, when it did badly he blamed other people and when it went well he tried to take part of the credit. The same problem applies to that for what should be obvious reasons.', '>>{____yourcouch} : read back this thread and see if your stupidity comes back to smack you in the face.', ">>{jasonzimmy} : You obviously didn't watch either convention if you think that was the make up of either convention. Or the fact, and I highlight fact, that crime rates are down.", ">>{PMC_KC} : We'll African American's didn't Immigrate to the US and many of the Immigration laws were put in place due to the massive amounts of Asian immigration in the 1840. I'm not saying their representation doesn't influence our culture, it does, in a positive way. I'm saying that you spouting off that we're a Nation of Immigrants is disingenuous. Little copy paste for ya: Revolutionary Americans, the United States’ founders, were fairly homogeneous: 80 percent of British origin (60 percent English, 20 percent Scottish and Scots-Irish), most of the rest Dutch and German—the great majority American-born. Overwhelmingly Christian, 98 percent were Protestants.", ">>{JoshuaZ1} : I'm not sure that's true, and I'm not sure how even if it were true, it would be at all relevant to the point at hand: he blames others when things fail and takes credit when they go well.", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Crime rates are increasing. And yes, I did watch every hour of all 4 days of each convention. I may have recieved cancer from the DNC tho.', ">>{jasonzimmy} : There were more politicians, advocates, public servants type speakers at the DNC than total speakers at the RNC, so thus you're either lying about watching or willfully trolling.", ">>{____yourcouch} : More dressed up racism, pretending we are our forefathers, or the fact that Africans weren't willing immigrants, so their status as immigrant is illegitimate.", ">>{i-am-sancho} : Are you fucking serious? Every immigrant I've ever met in the service was so dedicated to wanting to serve this country and earn their citizenship. This is some bullshit fear mongering that is only going to stir up all kinds of suspicion and animosity among the troops. Fuck this guy.", ">>{Da_Undahtakah} : I'm not Pro-Clinton by any means but those are definitely WIFI antennas. I install that kind of shit sometimes.", ">>{Meetchel} : By *educated*, he means well-traveled, contemplative, empathetic and understanding of people and how this nation and the world works. Not a piece of paper your mother framed and hung in your childhood bedroom. I feel like there's a relevant quote or two from Good Will Hunting that I could share with you here that would be applicable.", ">>{muffler48} : Ttyou seem to have watched and read about a convention I didn't. There weren't 100000 people protesting the convention I saw and once I saw that number I basically discounted your reply. I watch a democratic convention where some people voiced their views. They did so at the constitutional convention too.. So what!", ">>{MakeshiftChemistry} : Directly after the DNC: **Every Clinton Supporter:** Man, you guys, Trump is gonna be so mad when he sees the ratings. The DNC spent money and booked huge talent! They're gonna crush Drumpf! Haha Trumpeters! *-Nielsen ratings intensify-* **Every Clinton Supporter:** Yeah, well, if you include the two networks they didn't, she totally crushed Cheeto Jesus!", '>>{beatles910} : Just playing "devils advocate," but how would you expect a spy in the military to act?', '>>{MimonFishbaum} : CSPAN wasnt counted? That was the only way to watch without idiots talking over everything.', ">>{PMC_KC} : How can you call that racism, honestly, do you know what the word means? I think you should probably grow up and realize that not every culture in the world is equal. There's a massive incentive for Illegal Immigrants to flock to the country due to the social benefits they receive. The vast majority are unskilled uneducated workers that are not a net positive to the economy and have no regard for culture, customs and past. I can't just move to Canada and scum off their social programs, why should millions of Illegals be able to here?", '>>{oscarboom} : The entire convention was an embarrassing shitshow from start to finish. Day 1: So many Republicans have stayed away from Trump\'s convention that he gets Chachi to speak. LOL! Melania Trump delivers a clearly plagiarized speech which everyone is talking about the next day. The dishonest Trump campaign flatly denies the truth. Day 2: The GOP is casting Hillary as some sort of witch who is friends with Satan and needs to be hunted down. Everybody at home is thinking that nobody in that stadium should be anywhere near any actual power. Day 3: Yet another cringing embarrassment. Cruz gets a prime speaking slot and fails to endorse the party\'s own candidate. A big contrast to when Bernie Sanders, President Obama, Vice President Biden, etc, all gave huge endorsements for Hillary Clinton. Then afterwards Gingrich speaks and in a surreal moment essentially tells everyone "lets all just pretend that Cruz endorsed Trump", awkwardly reminding everyone of what happened earlier. Day 4: Trump voice is now sounding even more irritating then Ted Cruz\'s voice sounds which I would have earlier thought impossible. After all the cult of personality stuff is done we got a long, boring, angry and incoherent speech of Trump yelling like a lunatic literally the entire time (even while having little substance), the precise opposite of Reagan\'s sunny optimism. It was so dark and depressing I feel like part of my soul died inside from listening to Trump yell for so long. Something is seriously wrong with the guy who gave that speech. I am more convinced than ever now that Trump must never be near the nuclear codes.', ">>{oscarboom} : Crime rates are drastically lower than they were when Reagan was president. And all Trump said was: Crime is bad, and I'm definitely the only person in America who can fix it, even though I'm not providing any details because I don't have a clue myself. I just want Americans to be fearful, so they will surrender their status as free Americans and gladly be ruled by a strongman dictator instead.", '>>{i-am-sancho} : Sneakily. With shifty eyes. Maybe talking into their watch a lot in some other language.', '>>{muffler48} : You are spot on.. The GOP convention was a mess. I laughed until I realized it was real.', ">>{taint_a_chode} : Most of my Trump supporting (don't ask) friends watch on c-span 'cause they don't trust main stream media.", ">>{taint_a_chode} : I laughed my ass off and bet my friends that the DNC couldn't top it. But they did! Amazing time to be alive.", ">>{____yourcouch} : I think you need a dictionary. Culture and social safety nets aren't the same thing. Arguing we need to keep out other cultures is xenophobic and often an indicator of racism. arguing we need to reform our immigration program to maintain our social welfare is a legitimate argument. Of course, to that I would argue that we need to have special considerations for skilled workers, who will build our tax base and help our social programs, and the migrant workers which our agricultural industry is dependent. Obviously our current system is broken, but you can't just deport people from the only country they've ever known and you cant enforce the current immigration laws in place without restricting the labor force and tanking the economy.", '>>{treerat} : Beauregard: List all the known spies in the military over the past 25 years. Not tell us how many were "immigrants." Or, just shut the fuck up.', ">>{PMC_KC} : I'm not arguing that we need to keep out other cultures, I'm all for legal Immigration from countries that don't pose a threat to our way of life. The base of my argument doesn't come from a xenophobic or racism place, it comes from the fact we can't afford to just let whoever the hell we want in. You seem to keep crying racism but when I ask if I can just move to Canada and hop on their social programs you have nothing to say. Do you lock your doors at home?", '>>{taint_a_chode} : It\'s kind of like the Dems freaking out with "If you don\'t vote for Hillary, we\'re all going to get fucked by red hot pokers!!!!" It works for too many people on both sides.', ">>{Hardy723} : I'm actually not at all opposed to having immigrants earn their citizenship via serving in our military.", '>>{i-am-sancho} : It was included as part of the DREAM Act. It never passed.', '>>{gonetosea} : Thank you. So over all more people watched Hillary than Trump. They might have been Trump supporters watching her but she still had more people watch her.', ">>{taint_a_chode} : I wonder how many were policy wonks that watched both? I hope that people commenting on the conventions actually watched both of them. I don't hold myself to this standard of course.", '>>{____yourcouch} : sorry, I thought you were defending that other guy in this thread who was making the xenophobic "other cultures should git" argument.', ">>{PMC_KC} : No not at all, sane social liberal economic conservative that likes/dislikes everyone equally. (That respects the USA, Women and Gays, ie not radical Islam) I also don't think Trump will deport 11-30 Million Illegals. I think catch and release should end, ICE should get the funding they need and local municipalities shouldn't incur the cost of housing said criminal illegals until their deportation. Illegals in the US apply for citizenship now, are not bumped ahead of people applying legally and if they don't break the law before they're naturalized they stay. I'll be the first to admit it's a messy situation, the fact you can't even find reliable numbers is worse to someone like me (I like numbers/facts). So in my as informed opinion as I can have with current research, I don't believe our current path is sustainable. Cheers", ">>{oscarboom} : Except that Trump's claim of crime going up is easily proven false. The entire country observing that Trump doesn't have the temperament and judgement to be president is proven right every single day.", ">>{Outlaw-In-Law} : While no one believes every immigrant in the U.S. military fits that profile, what Sessions pointed out is not beyond the realm of possibilities. Think about it. Put the shoe on the other foot and imagine how you would go about infiltrating the U.S. military if you were a hostile nation. The use of non-citizen foreign nationals in the military poses a golden opportunity. This country is not going to stop admitting foreign nationals into the military. It's also not going to end legal immigration practices. However, it can and should crack down on the flow of illegal immigrants and deport those who have wantonly violated the nation's immigration laws.", ">>{Adama0001} : A smart hostile nation wouldn't attack its military from the rank and file but from its chain of command. If you could somehow control the very topmost commander or at least get one that won't push back when you're positioning yourself for a greater influence and control of key regions then you're more likely to succeed. For example look at Ukraine. Or maybe what the NSA had to say about a certain state actors involvement in the hacks and influencing of our own election. Who controls the military in the US?", '>>{Barron_Cyber} : Or maybe sessions is the spy? More projections from the trump camp.', ">>{Barron_Cyber} : Dig up dirt on someone who is running for office. Hold it over their head. Get all the secrets. I've heard plenty of smart people, insanely intelligent people, say that putin has pics of trump and underaged girls in a party in moscow.", '>>{Barron_Cyber} : Not to mention that naturally born citizens can be turned as well.', '>>{i-am-sancho} : In fact, the most egregious cases of espionage have all been natural born citizens.', '>>{youforgotA} : Or they will just keep an extra eye peeled for suspicious behavior.', '>>{MrPibbWasBetter} : Notable anti-US espionage cases over the years * Aldrich Ames: Born in Wisconsin * David Boone: Born in Michigan * Earl Edwin Pitts: Born in Missouri * John Anthony Walker: Born in DC * Christopher John Boyce: Born in California * Harold James Nicholson: Born in Oregon * Jonathan Pollard: Born in Texas * Robert Hanssen: Born in Illinois * Stewart Nozette: Born in Illinois * Kendall and Gwendolyn Myers: Born in DC Look at all those brown immigrants.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{WildAnimus} : Obama puts North Atlantic zone off-limits to drilling, fishing', '>>{jcw4455} : Obama really is going through his Fuck it list.', '>>{kiarra33} : Yay! Finally some positive news, good ol Obama :)', ">>{Novae_Blue} : It's funny how this sort of thing will be completely negated if the TPP passes.", '>>{safeway7} : Good. Fish is too expensive and we need to make it cheaper.', ">>{ThatsPresTrumpForYou} : The fishers have 7 years to find new waters, and it's an executive order. Basically it will be reversed on the 9th of November.", ">>{Jas9191} : Just curious how does this make fish cheaper? I support him doing this but doesnt this make less space for fishing available? I would assume it'll change the behavior of some species and they'll use that area as a refuge in the future - do you think this will increase fish populations which will reduce costs?", '>>{Jas9191} : The fish industry is eating itself alive if anything this will help them by creating a place that over time fish will begin to use as a refuge for breeding.', ">>{Brodusgus} : The goal is to help the farm raised fish industry. With climate change comes different breeding grounds for wild caught fish. There isn't a sanctuary, just an off limit zone. Catch limits have been reduced. Seasonal products like shrimp and lobster are cut back because where you normally find them has been affected by warming waters.", ">>{Jas9191} : Idk I think we still need to cut back on fishing wild caught fish. Pacific Tuna is down to like 6% of its prefished population and many other species are right along with it. My buddy fishes Salmon in Alaska all summer and this was their worst year simply because of a lack of fish. It's getting scary.", ">>{Brodusgus} : It's really scary that an ecosystem that relies on certain conditions just can't survive in traditional waters anymore. It's not that the fish aren't there due to over fishing, it's more they have to be in habitats that help them survive. Breeding grounds are moving to more suitable waters where the temperature is optimal.", '>>{Jas9191} : Ahh I see, that is scary. Even scarier really. Its a lot harder to reverse climate change than to just stop fishing (like actually accomplishing not politically or economically)'], [">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Trump tops Clinton in TV ratings for convention speeches: 'We beat her'", ">>{JoshuaZ1} : I like how when he was losing on the first two convention nights he dismissed it and said he wasn't responsible for the convention, but when his ratings are higher on the last night that means that he had a part in beating her.", ">>{RandomCanucklehead} : I tuned in just to see if he'd mocked the disabled, accuse Hillary of bleeding from her 'wherever', shit on more POWs, offer to arm the Saudis with nukes, point to his African American, or talk about how big his penis is again. Sadly, all I got was the syphilitic ramblings of angry old orange who truly believes he's a one-man show. I was disappoint.", ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : I'm not sure what you're getting at. Wo what the rating weren't as good as the Dems the first two nights? All that matters is the last two, where the most prominent speakers were for both conventions, including the nominees. Almost 3 million more people tuned in for the last two days of the republican convention than the dem convention. That's a huge jump in terms of ratings.", '>>{JoshuaZ1} : [Data](http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/democratic-national-convention-ratings-night-one-dnc-beats-rnc-bernie-sanders-michelle-obama-1201823682/). [Trump whining about said data](http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/donald-trump-republican-national-convention-poor-ratings).', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : I only tuned into the Democratic National Convnetion to see if they covered the massive collusion with the media and corruption in the election process. Sadly, all I got was the pandering of a Compulsive liar and massively Incompetent nominee who truly believes people think she and the DNC aren't corrupt. I was disappoint.", ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : I still don't get your point. He still had better ratings the last two nights. The last two nights are the most important anyway. Sure, he was disappointed with the first two nights ratings, but I'm not sure why you are bringing it up. Funny how Mother Jones didn't write a shit-their article about how 3 million more people tuned into the RNC the last 2 nights.", ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Shhhh. Delete this. I Don't want you to get banned.", '>>{gonetosea} : If you include PBS and C-SPAN, Hillary had more viewers than Trump. Include streaming video, it was a landslide for Hillary. This is just like the landslide victory Hillary will have in November.', ">>{JoshuaZ1} : The point is that when Trump the convention poorly he blamed other people. When the convention did well he congratulated himself. I'm curious, will you at least acknowledge the basic factual issue that the RNC ratings for the first two nights were not as good as the DNC ratings for their first two nights?", ">>{muffler48} : Because people like to watch train wrecks in the works. Being the best ratings doesn't mean the best thing.", ">>{arcxa} : It doesn't matter how you start, it matters how you finish.", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Did I not acknowledge it? This article says that he said "**We** did it." He never said "I did it." So, he did not congratulate himself, he congratulated everyone who had a part in it.', ">>{jasonzimmy} : This is Trump's version of winning. Don't care about substance, I got better ratings thus I must be right. Not good.", ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : What substance? The DNC speakers had celebrities and unrealistic visions of the state of the US and the World. The RNC speakers were politicians and pastors. They were war Heros and authors. They were his family members. They painted a realistic state of the US and the World. They didn't ignore radical Islam or rising crime rates.", '>>{Writerhaha} : More Dems streamed then Republicans. The overall numbers equal out.', ">>{walter_neft} : And when you don't count online streams, the numbers are entirely innaccurate of actual views!", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Trust me, the DNC was more of a train wreck. Almost 100,000 people outside were protesting the nominee. Thousands of people inside were booing speakers and booing Hillary. They had white noise machines to block them out and had counter chants. The camera never showed the protesters outside and inside. They were actively censoring the protesting. Bernie had to email his supporters and tel them not to boo people, but they still did. Meanwhile at the RNC, they booed the hell out of Ted Cruz for not endorsing, likely ending his political career. They also covered the degenerates protesting outside. They had one uprising but it was 50-100 people out of thousands that attempted to win a vocal vote by screaming at the top of their lungs. They were properly booed and the vocal vote was changed to a roll call, where the never Trumpers got blown the fuck out.', ">>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : It says in the article that CSPAN was not counted, I'm not sure about PBS.", '>>{h3rring} : > white noise machine Dude... it was a wi-fi antenna. Go back to /r/conspiracy ASAP.', '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : https://youtu.be/vf5ZkGKk9SM Any proof that it was a wifi router? There is plenty of proof that it was white noise.', ">>{h3rring} : http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/antenna/installation/guide/ant2513p4mn.pdf If you're seriously wondering why you couldn't hear any protests during Hillary's speech, read this informative article: https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/why-america-couldnt-hear-or-see-bernie-protesters-during-hil", '>>{JoshuaZ1} : > Did I not acknowledge it? Glad we have that factual bit established then. > So, he did not congratulate himself, he congratulated everyone who had a part in it. You are correct. So what happened was, when it did badly he blamed other people and when it went well he tried to take part of the credit. The same problem applies to that for what should be obvious reasons.', ">>{jasonzimmy} : You obviously didn't watch either convention if you think that was the make up of either convention. Or the fact, and I highlight fact, that crime rates are down.", ">>{JoshuaZ1} : I'm not sure that's true, and I'm not sure how even if it were true, it would be at all relevant to the point at hand: he blames others when things fail and takes credit when they go well.", '>>{OBAMAS_BROTHER} : Crime rates are increasing. And yes, I did watch every hour of all 4 days of each convention. I may have recieved cancer from the DNC tho.', ">>{jasonzimmy} : There were more politicians, advocates, public servants type speakers at the DNC than total speakers at the RNC, so thus you're either lying about watching or willfully trolling.", ">>{Da_Undahtakah} : I'm not Pro-Clinton by any means but those are definitely WIFI antennas. I install that kind of shit sometimes.", ">>{muffler48} : Ttyou seem to have watched and read about a convention I didn't. There weren't 100000 people protesting the convention I saw and once I saw that number I basically discounted your reply. I watch a democratic convention where some people voiced their views. They did so at the constitutional convention too.. So what!", ">>{MakeshiftChemistry} : Directly after the DNC: **Every Clinton Supporter:** Man, you guys, Trump is gonna be so mad when he sees the ratings. The DNC spent money and booked huge talent! They're gonna crush Drumpf! Haha Trumpeters! *-Nielsen ratings intensify-* **Every Clinton Supporter:** Yeah, well, if you include the two networks they didn't, she totally crushed Cheeto Jesus!", '>>{MimonFishbaum} : CSPAN wasnt counted? That was the only way to watch without idiots talking over everything.', '>>{oscarboom} : The entire convention was an embarrassing shitshow from start to finish. Day 1: So many Republicans have stayed away from Trump\'s convention that he gets Chachi to speak. LOL! Melania Trump delivers a clearly plagiarized speech which everyone is talking about the next day. The dishonest Trump campaign flatly denies the truth. Day 2: The GOP is casting Hillary as some sort of witch who is friends with Satan and needs to be hunted down. Everybody at home is thinking that nobody in that stadium should be anywhere near any actual power. Day 3: Yet another cringing embarrassment. Cruz gets a prime speaking slot and fails to endorse the party\'s own candidate. A big contrast to when Bernie Sanders, President Obama, Vice President Biden, etc, all gave huge endorsements for Hillary Clinton. Then afterwards Gingrich speaks and in a surreal moment essentially tells everyone "lets all just pretend that Cruz endorsed Trump", awkwardly reminding everyone of what happened earlier. Day 4: Trump voice is now sounding even more irritating then Ted Cruz\'s voice sounds which I would have earlier thought impossible. After all the cult of personality stuff is done we got a long, boring, angry and incoherent speech of Trump yelling like a lunatic literally the entire time (even while having little substance), the precise opposite of Reagan\'s sunny optimism. It was so dark and depressing I feel like part of my soul died inside from listening to Trump yell for so long. Something is seriously wrong with the guy who gave that speech. I am more convinced than ever now that Trump must never be near the nuclear codes.', ">>{oscarboom} : Crime rates are drastically lower than they were when Reagan was president. And all Trump said was: Crime is bad, and I'm definitely the only person in America who can fix it, even though I'm not providing any details because I don't have a clue myself. I just want Americans to be fearful, so they will surrender their status as free Americans and gladly be ruled by a strongman dictator instead.", '>>{muffler48} : You are spot on.. The GOP convention was a mess. I laughed until I realized it was real.', ">>{taint_a_chode} : Most of my Trump supporting (don't ask) friends watch on c-span 'cause they don't trust main stream media.", ">>{taint_a_chode} : I laughed my ass off and bet my friends that the DNC couldn't top it. But they did! Amazing time to be alive.", '>>{taint_a_chode} : It\'s kind of like the Dems freaking out with "If you don\'t vote for Hillary, we\'re all going to get fucked by red hot pokers!!!!" It works for too many people on both sides.', '>>{gonetosea} : Thank you. So over all more people watched Hillary than Trump. They might have been Trump supporters watching her but she still had more people watch her.', ">>{taint_a_chode} : I wonder how many were policy wonks that watched both? I hope that people commenting on the conventions actually watched both of them. I don't hold myself to this standard of course.", ">>{oscarboom} : Except that Trump's claim of crime going up is easily proven false. The entire country observing that Trump doesn't have the temperament and judgement to be president is proven right every single day."], ['>>{SRW90} : Trump attorney general pick Jeff Sessions said immigrants in the U.S. military might be spies', '>>{chillymtnman} : and whistle-blowers are terrorists, U.S. military service is a route immigrants can take for citizenship....', ">>{mrdominoe} : Oh great. So now they won't be able to use the military to prove their support for the United States? How in the hell is anyone supposed to enter this country if you won't let them do anyth... oh wait... that's EXACTLY what they want.", ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : Does anybody pro-Trump actually think Sessions should be AG? If so, why? Edit: I mean most lawyers are conservative and you can't find a better one than Sessions?", '>>{wstsdr} : Next week on "*let\'s scare the base*" we\'ll discuss how immigrants might be smuggling in a dangerous new type of cancer.', ">>{wwarnout} : Great. Let's turn our military personnel against each other. What a fucking idiot.", ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : Okay, but you really didn't answer my question. Why Sessions specifically? Any conservative Trump-appointed AG would likely address immigration to your liking.", '>>{SRW90} : A lot of them [were not happy](https://np.reddit.com/r/EnoughTrumpSpam/comments/5dp2sk/slug/da6bw6n) with the announcement.', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Yeah. Great choice there, guys. Truly. A forward thinking AG for a new era right here, boy-o let me tell you...', ">>{therealhood} : So... you're basically ready to compromise everything you believe in just for not accepting any immigrants into the country?", ">>{____yourcouch} : You are aware the US has no cohesive culture right? it's an immigrant culture by definition. your argument is nonsensical, but I applaud your earnest attempt to try to dress up your xenophobia. This is the new white nationalism, folks. some of them went to school and learned how to word their racist and xenophobic bullshit in more pleasant terms.", '>>{helpmesleep666} : My uncle is super conservative voted Trump. "Session is a fucking idiot". I could tell he feels a bit betrayed. Also we\'re Jews.. I totally forgot to bring up Bannon.', ">>{helpmesleep666} : So anyone but Chris Christie? That's like.. a lot of people.", ">>{helpmesleep666} : >I went to private schools :D ! No you live in a private bubble.. I went to private school too, my world views aren't xenophobic.. that's not an excuse.", ">>{helpmesleep666} : >I don't like multiculturalism and everything that comes with it. I like experiencing other cultures in their respective countries. lmfao", ">>{PMC_KC} : You're insane, we're not a nation of Immigrants, we're a nation of Settlers that is mostly British with a little Dutch mixed in. You might say our country and constitution were built around those values.", ">>{____yourcouch} : we are an immigrant nation, so our culture is by definition immigrant. Unless you're contending native culture is dominant, there is no culture here that must be preserved in a bubble. all the greatest parts of our culture, from jazz to rock and roll, to film, and cuisine borrow from Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. you may have gone to private school (as did I, although mine was no bubble) but that doesn't mean you're educated.", ">>{____yourcouch} : lol, that's like the pot calling the silverware black. That's some nice projection on the insane bit of you seriously are crazy enough to neglect the huge African and Asian influence on our culture. This is the white nationalist racism we're talking about folks :)", ">>{Meetchel} : I think single issue voters in general tend to be selfish and only think of themselves. At least you own it though, I guess. The general voting populace *should* be thinking not only of themselves but of their country. I'm a relatively wealthy 35 year old single white man and will likely not have children, yet compassion towards others pushes me away from my own self-interests; I have always voted liberal and will continue to do so despite the fact it may not be to my personal benefit.", ">>{helpmesleep666} : I don't know I tried to tell him that the entire time.", '>>{____yourcouch} : read back this thread and see if your stupidity comes back to smack you in the face.', ">>{PMC_KC} : We'll African American's didn't Immigrate to the US and many of the Immigration laws were put in place due to the massive amounts of Asian immigration in the 1840. I'm not saying their representation doesn't influence our culture, it does, in a positive way. I'm saying that you spouting off that we're a Nation of Immigrants is disingenuous. Little copy paste for ya: Revolutionary Americans, the United States’ founders, were fairly homogeneous: 80 percent of British origin (60 percent English, 20 percent Scottish and Scots-Irish), most of the rest Dutch and German—the great majority American-born. Overwhelmingly Christian, 98 percent were Protestants.", ">>{____yourcouch} : More dressed up racism, pretending we are our forefathers, or the fact that Africans weren't willing immigrants, so their status as immigrant is illegitimate.", ">>{i-am-sancho} : Are you fucking serious? Every immigrant I've ever met in the service was so dedicated to wanting to serve this country and earn their citizenship. This is some bullshit fear mongering that is only going to stir up all kinds of suspicion and animosity among the troops. Fuck this guy.", ">>{Meetchel} : By *educated*, he means well-traveled, contemplative, empathetic and understanding of people and how this nation and the world works. Not a piece of paper your mother framed and hung in your childhood bedroom. I feel like there's a relevant quote or two from Good Will Hunting that I could share with you here that would be applicable.", '>>{beatles910} : Just playing "devils advocate," but how would you expect a spy in the military to act?', ">>{PMC_KC} : How can you call that racism, honestly, do you know what the word means? I think you should probably grow up and realize that not every culture in the world is equal. There's a massive incentive for Illegal Immigrants to flock to the country due to the social benefits they receive. The vast majority are unskilled uneducated workers that are not a net positive to the economy and have no regard for culture, customs and past. I can't just move to Canada and scum off their social programs, why should millions of Illegals be able to here?", '>>{i-am-sancho} : Sneakily. With shifty eyes. Maybe talking into their watch a lot in some other language.', ">>{____yourcouch} : I think you need a dictionary. Culture and social safety nets aren't the same thing. Arguing we need to keep out other cultures is xenophobic and often an indicator of racism. arguing we need to reform our immigration program to maintain our social welfare is a legitimate argument. Of course, to that I would argue that we need to have special considerations for skilled workers, who will build our tax base and help our social programs, and the migrant workers which our agricultural industry is dependent. Obviously our current system is broken, but you can't just deport people from the only country they've ever known and you cant enforce the current immigration laws in place without restricting the labor force and tanking the economy.", '>>{treerat} : Beauregard: List all the known spies in the military over the past 25 years. Not tell us how many were "immigrants." Or, just shut the fuck up.', ">>{PMC_KC} : I'm not arguing that we need to keep out other cultures, I'm all for legal Immigration from countries that don't pose a threat to our way of life. The base of my argument doesn't come from a xenophobic or racism place, it comes from the fact we can't afford to just let whoever the hell we want in. You seem to keep crying racism but when I ask if I can just move to Canada and hop on their social programs you have nothing to say. Do you lock your doors at home?", ">>{Hardy723} : I'm actually not at all opposed to having immigrants earn their citizenship via serving in our military.", '>>{i-am-sancho} : It was included as part of the DREAM Act. It never passed.', '>>{____yourcouch} : sorry, I thought you were defending that other guy in this thread who was making the xenophobic "other cultures should git" argument.', ">>{PMC_KC} : No not at all, sane social liberal economic conservative that likes/dislikes everyone equally. (That respects the USA, Women and Gays, ie not radical Islam) I also don't think Trump will deport 11-30 Million Illegals. I think catch and release should end, ICE should get the funding they need and local municipalities shouldn't incur the cost of housing said criminal illegals until their deportation. Illegals in the US apply for citizenship now, are not bumped ahead of people applying legally and if they don't break the law before they're naturalized they stay. I'll be the first to admit it's a messy situation, the fact you can't even find reliable numbers is worse to someone like me (I like numbers/facts). So in my as informed opinion as I can have with current research, I don't believe our current path is sustainable. Cheers", ">>{Outlaw-In-Law} : While no one believes every immigrant in the U.S. military fits that profile, what Sessions pointed out is not beyond the realm of possibilities. Think about it. Put the shoe on the other foot and imagine how you would go about infiltrating the U.S. military if you were a hostile nation. The use of non-citizen foreign nationals in the military poses a golden opportunity. This country is not going to stop admitting foreign nationals into the military. It's also not going to end legal immigration practices. However, it can and should crack down on the flow of illegal immigrants and deport those who have wantonly violated the nation's immigration laws.", ">>{Adama0001} : A smart hostile nation wouldn't attack its military from the rank and file but from its chain of command. If you could somehow control the very topmost commander or at least get one that won't push back when you're positioning yourself for a greater influence and control of key regions then you're more likely to succeed. For example look at Ukraine. Or maybe what the NSA had to say about a certain state actors involvement in the hacks and influencing of our own election. Who controls the military in the US?", '>>{Barron_Cyber} : Or maybe sessions is the spy? More projections from the trump camp.', ">>{Barron_Cyber} : Dig up dirt on someone who is running for office. Hold it over their head. Get all the secrets. I've heard plenty of smart people, insanely intelligent people, say that putin has pics of trump and underaged girls in a party in moscow.", '>>{Barron_Cyber} : Not to mention that naturally born citizens can be turned as well.', '>>{i-am-sancho} : In fact, the most egregious cases of espionage have all been natural born citizens.', '>>{youforgotA} : Or they will just keep an extra eye peeled for suspicious behavior.', '>>{MrPibbWasBetter} : Notable anti-US espionage cases over the years * Aldrich Ames: Born in Wisconsin * David Boone: Born in Michigan * Earl Edwin Pitts: Born in Missouri * John Anthony Walker: Born in DC * Christopher John Boyce: Born in California * Harold James Nicholson: Born in Oregon * Jonathan Pollard: Born in Texas * Robert Hanssen: Born in Illinois * Stewart Nozette: Born in Illinois * Kendall and Gwendolyn Myers: Born in DC Look at all those brown immigrants.']]

classify and reply

['>>{murtadi007} : I can see it being usable until Q3 2018. Personally holding out for the iPhone 8 as my next upgrade (after a battery replacement).', '>>{weshallrise} : The Estate Tax is necessary to prevent the uber-wealthy from returning to the aristocracy. There is nothing wrong with the children of the top 1% paying taxes on free money that they themselves did not earn. There is no "Right of Birth" in a truly Democratic society.', ">>{sweetanxiousbastard} : As much as I dislike the Trump administration, they don't want to eliminate national parks. They want to sell some federal land. That's not a good thing, but it's not the extreme stated in the title.", '>>{CMDR-Mindphaser} : Sen. Susan Collins Announces She Will Vote Against Pruitt For EPA', '>>{AreWeNotDoinPhrasing} : What phone are you coming from? If you can handle the comically small screen, the SE would be a better buy. The 6 does still have a few years left in it though I’d wager.', '>>{USModerate} : Hoping we can close these loopholes and raise the rates and enforcement', ">>{_Guinness} : Not true at all. Republicans have long wanted to eliminate national parks by selling them off. Here are many, many articles talking about this. They're gearing up to get what they want. [Congress just made it easier to sell off federal land, including national parks ](http://www.businessinsider.com/congress-lays-groundwork-to-get-rid-of-federal-land-and-national-parks-2017-1) [The House just made it a lot easier to sell off national parks ](https://thinkprogress.org/house-officially-says-parks-have-no-value-3e5c588867fd#.9i27u0nbg) [GOP Platform Proposes To Get Rid Of National Parks And National Forests ](https://thinkprogress.org/gop-platform-proposes-to-get-rid-of-national-parks-and-national-forests-5d17bb3eee07#.zfzeskt4x) [Republican Senators Just Voted To Sell Off Your National Forests](http://gizmodo.com/republican-senators-just-voted-to-sell-off-your-nationa-1696862450) [House Republicans seek to open up national forests to mining and logging ](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/24/house-republicans-open-national-forests-mining-logging-oregon-militia-malheur-wildlife-refuge) [Yes, the Republican Party Literally Wants to Eliminate National Parks ](http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a46749/republicans-national-parks/) [The Republican War on Parks](http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/inside-the-republican-war-parks)", '>>{Three_If_By_TARDIS} : So You Want To Go To War In Syria To Depose Assad. Can You Answer These 14 Questions First?', ">>{ssldvr} : Most people in this country fervently respect our National Parks. It's probably the one thing everyone can agree on supporting. I almost hope they try it just to see the glorious fallout for the GOP and Trump.", '>>{DirtWave} : >There is nothing wrong with the children of the top 1% paying taxes on free money that they themselves did not earn. OK you or Uncle Sam didn\'t earn the money either. Using estate assets to fund foreign military escapades or redistribute in a Robin Hood like fashion has nothing to do with a "true democracy". It\'s authoritiarain to the fullest extent actually. I would much prefer my estate goes untaxed to my children, as oppose to helping support the next brutal war from my grave. MOST importantly though: >Yet neither plan is likely to impact the wealthy or federal tax revenues, since so many of the highest payers are already working around the tax. LMAO you think the clintons are getting their esatate taxed when its passed on to Chelsea? hahahahahahahhahaha yea OK. This wouldnt even affect the wealthiest people, its all symbolic.', '>>{ihaphleas} : Please listen to some Milton Freiman, folks. Heavy estate taxes (and also inflation) just encourage high living rather than sound investment and saving for the future ... and future generations.', ">>{dagwood222} : Putin is playing a long game. He drops Assad and makes Donny a popular wartime President. Don't be duped.", '>>{Hillarys_shart} : How much do the poor pay in estate taxes?', ">>{MaelstromTX} : What angers me most is how they're now video-conferencing in questions from obviously hand-picked Trump/Republican sycophants during these press briefings.", '>>{AreWeNotDoinPhrasing} : You probably wouldn’t like the SE then. I’d say go for the 6, it’ll easily last 2 years if you’re buying new. Also should be supported by apple for at least those 2 years, maybe more.', ">>{PM_ME_UR_BULLSHIT} : Zombie T.R. is gonna shove his Big Stick up Trump's and the GOP's asses.", ">>{avEmonsta} : Yeah it will be fine. My brother has been using his iPhone 6 since December 2015 and he's had no issues of slowdowns or reboots. You'll manage fine. Please get the 64GB model at least. You'll kill yourself getting 16GB only.", ">>{Three_If_By_TARDIS} : For those looking to get right to the point: >1) What national security interest, rather than pure humanitarian interest, is served by the use of American military power to depose Assad’s regime? >2) How will deposing Assad make America safer? >3) What does final political victory in Syria look like (be specific), and how long will it take for that political victory to be achieved? Do you consider victory to be destabilization of Assad, the removal of Assad, the creation of a stable government that can protect itself and its people without additional assistance from the United States, etc.? >4) What military resources (e.g., ground troops), diplomatic resources, and financial resources will be required to achieve this political victory? >5) How long will it take to achieve political victory? >6) What costs, in terms of lives (both military and civilian), dollars, and forgone options elsewhere as a result of resource deployment in Syria, will be required to achieve political victory? >7) What other countries will join the United States in deposing Assad, in terms of military, monetary, or diplomatic resources? >8) Should explicit congressional authorization for the use of military force in Syria be required, or should the president take action without congressional approval? >9) What is the risk of wider conflict with Russia, given that nation’s presence and stake in Syria, if the United States chooses to invade and depose Assad, a key Russian ally in the Middle East? >10) If U.S. intervention in Syria does spark a larger war with Russia, what does political victory in that scenario look like, and what costs will it entail? >11) Given that Assad has already demonstrated a willingness to use chemical weapons, how should the United States respond if the Assad regime deploys chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons against the United States? >12) Assuming the Assad regime is successfully removed from power, what type of government structure will be used to replace Assad, who will select that government, and how will that government establish and maintain stability going forward? >13) Given that a change in political power in the United States radically altered the American position in Iraq in 2009, how will you mitigate or address the risk of a similar political dynamic upending your preferred strategy in Syria, either in 2018, 2020, or beyond? >14) What lessons did you learn from America’s failure to achieve and maintain political victory following the removal of governments in Iraq and Libya, and how will you apply those lessons to a potential war in Syria? >Until these questions are answered with specificity, and until the U.S. government is open and honest with the American people about the potential risks and likely costs of a war to remove Assad from power in Syria, it makes little sense to discuss the idea further. I'll eat my fucking lamp if Trump can give satisfactory answers to these.", '>>{jeffinRTP} : Should our founding fathers be required to answer the same questions but framed in what the British were doing?', ">>{tau-lepton} : None of course, those greedy bastards!! /s. Very few pay any estate tax at all, it doesn't even start unless it's over 10 million.", '>>{Pksoze} : I saw that...Trump is trying to have a state run media...with handpicked reporters that will lob softball questions to Spicer and advance the Trump agenda.', '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : 2018, folks. Bitching on Reddit is great, mobilizing is crucial.', '>>{sweetanxiousbastard} : I\'m not sure you read all those articles. There\'s a nuance in them that belies the title of this post. I will admit though that it is possible for the feds to sell every scrap of national land for nothing. That should be the statement. Not "Trump wants to eliminate..." The title is fake news and click bait. But then again, when was YouTube ever news? Edit: nuance', '>>{prostitutepiss} : This pretty much confirms that Russia planned this attack with Assad. We all know Donald needs a war to distract from his scandals. This allows for that. We all know Donald needs to distance himself and even show "opposition" to Kremlin. This also allows for that. With Russian Influence in Syria and the US attack and ousting of Assad, they would be in a position to install a new leader in Syria still willing to give access to Syrian resources that Russia wants. Maybe this way, Russia and US get even MORE. There\'s an evil plan being hatched here. Let\'s keep our eyes and eats open people.', '>>{unknownpoltroon} : Oh, this was obvious to me from the first time they announced this "skype" interviewings, and it became blindingly obvious today.', ">>{ejhickey} : me too. Trump just caved in to the neocons and libs. Go ahead and impeach him now. I don't care.", '>>{Neverhood123} : Jesus fucking christ. They are too fucking stupid to understand the benefit of large forests to oxygen breathing creatures.', '>>{FloopyDoopy} : Senator votes against guy who wants to dismantle EPA for EPA head.', '>>{DaGoz} : Isn\'t this what dictatorships do, have "plants" to show everyone that the common people and the media support the government?', '>>{tjacks7} : > she had concerns about his record of suing the agency he has been tapped to lead Yes, that is certainly concerning.', ">>{gen_mayhem} : The model they are selling is a 32gb. I'm not sure, but looks like apple is making a 32 gb version now and maybe phasing out the 16?", '>>{weshallrise} : 99% of households pay zero estate tax. Don\'t let anyone tell you that as a middle class American, you will have to pay this tax. Neither is it a "Death Tax." The inheritors pay the tax, not the estate of the deceased.', '>>{tolandruth} : The messed up thing is Hillary wants to raise the tax while doing the things to avoid paying it.', ">>{William_Conrad_Bain} : The fact that he currently has active lawsuits *against* the fucking EPA, and has stated he wouldn't recuse himself from said cases, should mean he should be beaten to death at a monster truck rally.", ">>{_Guinness} : > when was YouTube ever news? The White House youtube channel which puts up recordings of their White House press briefings isn't news?", ">>{avEmonsta} : Ye that's right. 32GB gold model but last i heard it's being released to [select Asian carriers](https://9to5mac.com/2017/03/03/apple-iphone-6-gold-32-gb-model-available-select-asian-carriers/) only though. It's not being sold by Apple retail.", ">>{3Suze} : I agree with what you said with one exception. The estate is responsible for the taxes - hence estate tax. The only tax that is passed down to heirs is the tax on the decedent's IRA account because it passes outside of the estate. Then they have to cough up 10% tax no matter how large or small the total assets of the deceased. Edit: I forgot about recipients of life insurance. Life insurance is tax free but it may or may not be included in the estate for tax purposes. If one utilizes an Insurance Trust, you can take it outside of the estate. This is a good tax shelter but it must be established 2 years prior to date of death Probate paralegal here.", '>>{_Guinness} : Did you notice how he addressed Spicer as "Commander Spicer"?', '>>{PugiPugiPugi43} : This isn\'t bad news by any means, but isn\'t it possible that she is doing this because she knows enough republicans will vote for him to where her saying no doesn\'t matter? You know, like McConnel told her behind closed doors "Hey, we know he\'ll get through, so vote against him. It\'ll help you with reelection in 2020 if you look like you\'re taking a stand against trump." It\'s not an unprecedented thing, so it\'s certainly possible in my mind.', '>>{NChSh} : Remember the last time the GOP was in charge of the White House and they gave conspiracy theory believing gay escorts press badges to ask hand-picked, softball questions? http://www.salon.com/2005/02/23/more_gannon/', ">>{GiggleGiggleTeeHee} : That's a nice thought but I honestly don't know. Trump supporters will swallow literally any pill you give them as long as you tell them it'll bring back jobs and keep them safe.", '>>{arg6531} : Duh. Sorry long day, I thought i was missing something. Thanks', ">>{faet} : She'd still pay the higher rate. Besides, you can be for higher taxes for one group, while still doing things that legally lower your tax obligations.", ">>{InfoSecProThrowAway} : She was on the committee for DeVos and voted yes to advance to the Senate. Then, she opposed, likely when McConnell told her the votes were solid. She's a piece of shit.", '>>{BasketDweller} : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Spicer#U.S._Navy_Reserve >In 1999, Spicer joined the U.S. Navy Reserve as a public affairs officer; **he currently holds the rank of Commander.**', ">>{jeffinRTP} : Take the 14 questions and put England in the place of Syria and so forth. Shouldn't they have applied the same standards the The Federalist expect us to apply to Syria?", '>>{dagwood222} : No. Syria is on the other side of the world and we were a British colony. Not apples and oranges, apples and motorcycles.', '>>{unknownpoltroon} : People having press conferences will often plant a question or two. They are just not this obvious and inept.', '>>{Kharn0} : Tell me, at what value does an estate tax place? As in, what is the minimum worth of an estate in order to be taxed?', '>>{DirtWave} : doesnt make a differnce- for me its the principle', '>>{Kharn0} : Well, the answer is $2 million. Anything less and no tax. The overwhelming majority of Americans will never pay it', '>>{NekronOfTheBlack} : Unfortunately Joe Manchin is voting for him. We need more Republican votes.', ">>{dualbrokenarms} : Keep trying. The hive mind is strong when it comes to hating on Trump. Frustrating thing is he's easy to hate without the lies.", '>>{Three_If_By_TARDIS} : No. Do you seriously not understand the difference between a local colonial separatist war in the late 18th century and foreign military intervention in the globalized 21st century?', '>>{ennervated_scientist} : Lars Larson is and always will be a piece of shit two-bit Rush Limbaugh wannabe.', ">>{techgirl_33} : I have no problem taking away a tax shelter. I do have a problem with taxing anyone at that high of a rate. If they weren't trying to take away that high of a percentage people would not try so hard to get around it. Think about it. How would you feel if the government tried to take away 65% of your money. Imagine that the government tried to take 65% of your paycheck. Or 65% of the money you made on selling your house. Drop that percentage and I'd be OK with saying everyone should have to pay it.", ">>{Snafu80} : I don't think it will be supported until 2020 at all, while my 6 runs well now on ios 10, I suspect with the next update it will start to slow abit. That being said, for it to last until 2020 that would mean support for 6 years which I think is a stretch.", ">>{martialalex} : But I didn't make that money, my parent did. So let's factor that into the image first. Also I have to imagine having 10's of millions of dollars as opposed to my current salary. 65% seems like a lot until you realize these people are still being left with at least a couple million dollars in inheritance if not more", '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : Total piece of shit. When do the tribunals for these shitbirds begin?', ">>{ComradeTaco} : He went to Portsmouth Abbey. Having lived in the area, it's a school for Rhode Island's very privileged. Surprised he isn't a bit more composed given the educational background.", ">>{techgirl_33} : It still isn't right to tax at that high of a percentage. I guarantee you if I knew that the money I was going to leave to my children was going to be taxed at that high of a percentage I would do everything I could to protect it. I think taxes should be there. I think either all estates should be taxed or none of them at a reasonable rate.", '>>{gen_mayhem} : hmmm. Yes I agree, 6 years is probably a stretch given tech life cycles today. Is upgrading compulsory or can I choose to remain on the current OS for as long as I like?', '>>{Hans_Paul_Oster} : Because the libs were eager to bomb Assad and get in on the meltdown that is Syria?', '>>{pillsbury1897} : Yeah they should have, because unnecessary wars are expensive, destructive and generally awful.', ">>{ConceptualTrap} : She's trying to save her seat...It's not going to work. Turn out will be too high to let her through on a ranked choice ballot.", '>>{PugiPugiPugi43} : That was the main reason why I feel that way, if she really opposed DeVos so much, why did she vote for her the first time in the Committe?', '>>{coldandpain} : I like national parks, really I do. I like the wilderness too. But Trump just threatened to send troops into Mexico. After ramping up rethoric against China the last 14 days and putting Iran "on notice". I really think focus needs to be on this or those national parks are going to be battlefields for american draftees...', '>>{jeffinRTP} : I guess maybe the questions would better have been asked of the French before they decided to help us.', ">>{sir_evan} : To realize the absurdity of Pruitt's nomination, just consider a company who was hiring a CEO who had sued that company *thirteen times*. Because that's [exactly how many time Pruitt has sued the EPA](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scott-pruitt-environmental-protection-agency_us_5878ad15e4b0b3c7a7b0c29c).", ">>{scrizewly} : Honestly I'd look on Craigslist, Letgo, or Offerup for a decently used 6s or 7. You can get a 6s now for ~$200-300 USD.", '>>{data2dave} : Oh Gosh Darn. Now we have to call him "Commander Sphincter"! 😂💩', '>>{_Guinness} : I should probably clarify what I mean. My point was that it seems to militarize the position of the press secretary. As if the white house press briefing room is supposed to be rank and file. It gives a very "follow orders follow your commander" feel to the position. Better? But yes he holds the title in the navy reserve. This isn\'t the naval reserve though. For example we refer to the president as "Mr. President" or "President Trump" and not "Commander in Chief Trump"', ">>{VStarffin} : Just to be clear about this - Trump doesn't *want* to do anything. He doesn't give a fuck if we keep national parks or not. Trump has no deep seated policy positions on basically anything other than xenaphobia. He's the most easily manipulated person to ever be President. All he cares about is flattery and adoration. He'll listen to the last person who he spoke to about something who was nice to him. That's why Steve Bannon is so fucking dangerous - he's the last person.", ">>{philly47} : While we're talking about Sean Spicer, a grown man, it's worth remembering that he eats three packs of gum by noon, every day.", '>>{scrizewly} : Although iOS certainly does get pretty pushy about it, Apple doesn\'t "force" you to update unless you do a factory reset in iTunes.', ">>{philly47} : Since you mentioned Sean Spicer, who is a grown-up, it's a good time to remind everyone that he eats almost three packs of Orbit Cinnamon Gum™ by [noon,](http://www.businessinsider.com/sean-spicer-gum-habit-dangerous-health-2017-1) every day.", ">>{gen_mayhem} : I did think about buying used, but was a bit apprehensive about warranties etc. I am getting a new one for ~435$ outright in my country. I don't if it's cheaper in the US, probably will be...", '>>{BasketDweller} : > For example we refer to the president as "Mr. President" or "President Trump" and not "Commander in Chief Trump" The President is very often referred to as the Commander-in-Chief. You failed miserably to make your point. Also, your post is a blatant violation of this subreddit rules because of the editorialized title of your post.', ">>{metaobject} : I'm curious, and this is a serious question, is that some sort of sign/symptom of Alzheimer's? The fact that he can't (or won't?) express his own views on a topic and instead just repeats whatever horseshit the last person poured into his empty head is worrisome.", ">>{scrizewly} : Apple covers the device for the full first year regardless of the amount of owners, in my experience. I'm on a 2nd owner iphone 7+, my son is on a 4th owner iphone 6s+. The 6s+ just had 2 rounds of screen replacements which were covered under warranty and is about to go for a third which wont' be covered (shattering).", ">>{PleaseGoOutside} : Personally I think the 6 is really starting to show its age, the processor is pretty slow and it's the last iPhone with 1gb of ram so that can be annoying how often apps reload.", ">>{IHave9Dads} : Oh fuck off, he didn't 'fail miserably' at his point. It is strange that he was referred to as Commander out of the blue, and it would be fairly concerning if another hand-picked reporter called Trump Commander-in-chief to keep it militarized. That's the worrying part- the militarization of seemingly more and more", '>>{jakeuten} : I bought a 6S 64 GB on eBay for $350. Look around on eBay/Craigslist etc. before shelling out a lot of money for a 2.5 year old phone.', ">>{extra_silence} : Wow I heard him talk about this Skype interview yesterday. Why can't these reporters stand up for themselves? That was a joke.", '>>{kiddestructo} : I much prefer to refer to him as Stupid Motherfucker.', ">>{_personofdisinterest} : > You failed miserably to make your point. No incivility please. That's a rule too.", '>>{BogeysLikeFireflies} : Good point here. They said forests, not parks. National Forests are designated multi-use for recreation and resources. Parks are off limits to logging. HOWEVER, they did say logging for energy. Anyone ever hear of wood-fired power plants? No? Me neither. Logging for wood is used primarily for pulp, paper and construction. Logging on the basis of "energy" is ridiculous unless the intent is just to clear the way for mining. The plantd question call in format is utter fucking bullshit though and this administration can go right to hell.', ">>{YgramulTheMany} : In 1980, the US was the world's largest importer of raw materials and the world's largest exporter of finished goods. Now we're the world's largest exporter of raw materials and the world's largest importer of finished goods... and this type of shit only makes it worse.", ">>{GiggleGiggleTeeHee} : And during the election Trump supporters were screaming about Hillary being a war monger. So they're okay with war as long as president dump is the one causing it apparently. You have my sympathy. I cannot imagine being around those people every day. Sometimes I'm thankful I live in my blue bubble.", '>>{surroundedbywolves} : The companies buying it are the ones that should be ashamed IMO. Same with environmental and pollution regulations being lifted. The assholes wanting to dump coal plant waste into our water are the villains. Trump and Congress are just mouthpieces — employees even.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{murtadi007} : I can see it being usable until Q3 2018. Personally holding out for the iPhone 8 as my next upgrade (after a battery replacement).', '>>{AreWeNotDoinPhrasing} : What phone are you coming from? If you can handle the comically small screen, the SE would be a better buy. The 6 does still have a few years left in it though I’d wager.', '>>{AreWeNotDoinPhrasing} : You probably wouldn’t like the SE then. I’d say go for the 6, it’ll easily last 2 years if you’re buying new. Also should be supported by apple for at least those 2 years, maybe more.', ">>{avEmonsta} : Yeah it will be fine. My brother has been using his iPhone 6 since December 2015 and he's had no issues of slowdowns or reboots. You'll manage fine. Please get the 64GB model at least. You'll kill yourself getting 16GB only.", ">>{gen_mayhem} : The model they are selling is a 32gb. I'm not sure, but looks like apple is making a 32 gb version now and maybe phasing out the 16?", ">>{avEmonsta} : Ye that's right. 32GB gold model but last i heard it's being released to [select Asian carriers](https://9to5mac.com/2017/03/03/apple-iphone-6-gold-32-gb-model-available-select-asian-carriers/) only though. It's not being sold by Apple retail.", ">>{Snafu80} : I don't think it will be supported until 2020 at all, while my 6 runs well now on ios 10, I suspect with the next update it will start to slow abit. That being said, for it to last until 2020 that would mean support for 6 years which I think is a stretch.", '>>{gen_mayhem} : hmmm. Yes I agree, 6 years is probably a stretch given tech life cycles today. Is upgrading compulsory or can I choose to remain on the current OS for as long as I like?', ">>{scrizewly} : Honestly I'd look on Craigslist, Letgo, or Offerup for a decently used 6s or 7. You can get a 6s now for ~$200-300 USD.", '>>{scrizewly} : Although iOS certainly does get pretty pushy about it, Apple doesn\'t "force" you to update unless you do a factory reset in iTunes.', ">>{gen_mayhem} : I did think about buying used, but was a bit apprehensive about warranties etc. I am getting a new one for ~435$ outright in my country. I don't if it's cheaper in the US, probably will be...", ">>{scrizewly} : Apple covers the device for the full first year regardless of the amount of owners, in my experience. I'm on a 2nd owner iphone 7+, my son is on a 4th owner iphone 6s+. The 6s+ just had 2 rounds of screen replacements which were covered under warranty and is about to go for a third which wont' be covered (shattering).", ">>{PleaseGoOutside} : Personally I think the 6 is really starting to show its age, the processor is pretty slow and it's the last iPhone with 1gb of ram so that can be annoying how often apps reload.", '>>{jakeuten} : I bought a 6S 64 GB on eBay for $350. Look around on eBay/Craigslist etc. before shelling out a lot of money for a 2.5 year old phone.'], ['>>{weshallrise} : The Estate Tax is necessary to prevent the uber-wealthy from returning to the aristocracy. There is nothing wrong with the children of the top 1% paying taxes on free money that they themselves did not earn. There is no "Right of Birth" in a truly Democratic society.', '>>{USModerate} : Hoping we can close these loopholes and raise the rates and enforcement', '>>{DirtWave} : >There is nothing wrong with the children of the top 1% paying taxes on free money that they themselves did not earn. OK you or Uncle Sam didn\'t earn the money either. Using estate assets to fund foreign military escapades or redistribute in a Robin Hood like fashion has nothing to do with a "true democracy". It\'s authoritiarain to the fullest extent actually. I would much prefer my estate goes untaxed to my children, as oppose to helping support the next brutal war from my grave. MOST importantly though: >Yet neither plan is likely to impact the wealthy or federal tax revenues, since so many of the highest payers are already working around the tax. LMAO you think the clintons are getting their esatate taxed when its passed on to Chelsea? hahahahahahahhahaha yea OK. This wouldnt even affect the wealthiest people, its all symbolic.', '>>{ihaphleas} : Please listen to some Milton Freiman, folks. Heavy estate taxes (and also inflation) just encourage high living rather than sound investment and saving for the future ... and future generations.', '>>{Hillarys_shart} : How much do the poor pay in estate taxes?', ">>{tau-lepton} : None of course, those greedy bastards!! /s. Very few pay any estate tax at all, it doesn't even start unless it's over 10 million.", '>>{weshallrise} : 99% of households pay zero estate tax. Don\'t let anyone tell you that as a middle class American, you will have to pay this tax. Neither is it a "Death Tax." The inheritors pay the tax, not the estate of the deceased.', '>>{tolandruth} : The messed up thing is Hillary wants to raise the tax while doing the things to avoid paying it.', ">>{3Suze} : I agree with what you said with one exception. The estate is responsible for the taxes - hence estate tax. The only tax that is passed down to heirs is the tax on the decedent's IRA account because it passes outside of the estate. Then they have to cough up 10% tax no matter how large or small the total assets of the deceased. Edit: I forgot about recipients of life insurance. Life insurance is tax free but it may or may not be included in the estate for tax purposes. If one utilizes an Insurance Trust, you can take it outside of the estate. This is a good tax shelter but it must be established 2 years prior to date of death Probate paralegal here.", ">>{faet} : She'd still pay the higher rate. Besides, you can be for higher taxes for one group, while still doing things that legally lower your tax obligations.", '>>{Kharn0} : Tell me, at what value does an estate tax place? As in, what is the minimum worth of an estate in order to be taxed?', '>>{DirtWave} : doesnt make a differnce- for me its the principle', '>>{Kharn0} : Well, the answer is $2 million. Anything less and no tax. The overwhelming majority of Americans will never pay it', ">>{techgirl_33} : I have no problem taking away a tax shelter. I do have a problem with taxing anyone at that high of a rate. If they weren't trying to take away that high of a percentage people would not try so hard to get around it. Think about it. How would you feel if the government tried to take away 65% of your money. Imagine that the government tried to take 65% of your paycheck. Or 65% of the money you made on selling your house. Drop that percentage and I'd be OK with saying everyone should have to pay it.", ">>{martialalex} : But I didn't make that money, my parent did. So let's factor that into the image first. Also I have to imagine having 10's of millions of dollars as opposed to my current salary. 65% seems like a lot until you realize these people are still being left with at least a couple million dollars in inheritance if not more", ">>{techgirl_33} : It still isn't right to tax at that high of a percentage. I guarantee you if I knew that the money I was going to leave to my children was going to be taxed at that high of a percentage I would do everything I could to protect it. I think taxes should be there. I think either all estates should be taxed or none of them at a reasonable rate."], [">>{sweetanxiousbastard} : As much as I dislike the Trump administration, they don't want to eliminate national parks. They want to sell some federal land. That's not a good thing, but it's not the extreme stated in the title.", ">>{_Guinness} : Not true at all. Republicans have long wanted to eliminate national parks by selling them off. Here are many, many articles talking about this. They're gearing up to get what they want. [Congress just made it easier to sell off federal land, including national parks ](http://www.businessinsider.com/congress-lays-groundwork-to-get-rid-of-federal-land-and-national-parks-2017-1) [The House just made it a lot easier to sell off national parks ](https://thinkprogress.org/house-officially-says-parks-have-no-value-3e5c588867fd#.9i27u0nbg) [GOP Platform Proposes To Get Rid Of National Parks And National Forests ](https://thinkprogress.org/gop-platform-proposes-to-get-rid-of-national-parks-and-national-forests-5d17bb3eee07#.zfzeskt4x) [Republican Senators Just Voted To Sell Off Your National Forests](http://gizmodo.com/republican-senators-just-voted-to-sell-off-your-nationa-1696862450) [House Republicans seek to open up national forests to mining and logging ](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/24/house-republicans-open-national-forests-mining-logging-oregon-militia-malheur-wildlife-refuge) [Yes, the Republican Party Literally Wants to Eliminate National Parks ](http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a46749/republicans-national-parks/) [The Republican War on Parks](http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/inside-the-republican-war-parks)", ">>{ssldvr} : Most people in this country fervently respect our National Parks. It's probably the one thing everyone can agree on supporting. I almost hope they try it just to see the glorious fallout for the GOP and Trump.", ">>{MaelstromTX} : What angers me most is how they're now video-conferencing in questions from obviously hand-picked Trump/Republican sycophants during these press briefings.", ">>{PM_ME_UR_BULLSHIT} : Zombie T.R. is gonna shove his Big Stick up Trump's and the GOP's asses.", '>>{Pksoze} : I saw that...Trump is trying to have a state run media...with handpicked reporters that will lob softball questions to Spicer and advance the Trump agenda.', '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : 2018, folks. Bitching on Reddit is great, mobilizing is crucial.', '>>{sweetanxiousbastard} : I\'m not sure you read all those articles. There\'s a nuance in them that belies the title of this post. I will admit though that it is possible for the feds to sell every scrap of national land for nothing. That should be the statement. Not "Trump wants to eliminate..." The title is fake news and click bait. But then again, when was YouTube ever news? Edit: nuance', '>>{unknownpoltroon} : Oh, this was obvious to me from the first time they announced this "skype" interviewings, and it became blindingly obvious today.', '>>{Neverhood123} : Jesus fucking christ. They are too fucking stupid to understand the benefit of large forests to oxygen breathing creatures.', '>>{DaGoz} : Isn\'t this what dictatorships do, have "plants" to show everyone that the common people and the media support the government?', ">>{_Guinness} : > when was YouTube ever news? The White House youtube channel which puts up recordings of their White House press briefings isn't news?", '>>{_Guinness} : Did you notice how he addressed Spicer as "Commander Spicer"?', '>>{NChSh} : Remember the last time the GOP was in charge of the White House and they gave conspiracy theory believing gay escorts press badges to ask hand-picked, softball questions? http://www.salon.com/2005/02/23/more_gannon/', ">>{GiggleGiggleTeeHee} : That's a nice thought but I honestly don't know. Trump supporters will swallow literally any pill you give them as long as you tell them it'll bring back jobs and keep them safe.", '>>{arg6531} : Duh. Sorry long day, I thought i was missing something. Thanks', '>>{BasketDweller} : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Spicer#U.S._Navy_Reserve >In 1999, Spicer joined the U.S. Navy Reserve as a public affairs officer; **he currently holds the rank of Commander.**', '>>{unknownpoltroon} : People having press conferences will often plant a question or two. They are just not this obvious and inept.', ">>{dualbrokenarms} : Keep trying. The hive mind is strong when it comes to hating on Trump. Frustrating thing is he's easy to hate without the lies.", '>>{ennervated_scientist} : Lars Larson is and always will be a piece of shit two-bit Rush Limbaugh wannabe.', ">>{ComradeTaco} : He went to Portsmouth Abbey. Having lived in the area, it's a school for Rhode Island's very privileged. Surprised he isn't a bit more composed given the educational background.", '>>{coldandpain} : I like national parks, really I do. I like the wilderness too. But Trump just threatened to send troops into Mexico. After ramping up rethoric against China the last 14 days and putting Iran "on notice". I really think focus needs to be on this or those national parks are going to be battlefields for american draftees...', '>>{data2dave} : Oh Gosh Darn. Now we have to call him "Commander Sphincter"! 😂💩', '>>{_Guinness} : I should probably clarify what I mean. My point was that it seems to militarize the position of the press secretary. As if the white house press briefing room is supposed to be rank and file. It gives a very "follow orders follow your commander" feel to the position. Better? But yes he holds the title in the navy reserve. This isn\'t the naval reserve though. For example we refer to the president as "Mr. President" or "President Trump" and not "Commander in Chief Trump"', ">>{VStarffin} : Just to be clear about this - Trump doesn't *want* to do anything. He doesn't give a fuck if we keep national parks or not. Trump has no deep seated policy positions on basically anything other than xenaphobia. He's the most easily manipulated person to ever be President. All he cares about is flattery and adoration. He'll listen to the last person who he spoke to about something who was nice to him. That's why Steve Bannon is so fucking dangerous - he's the last person.", ">>{philly47} : While we're talking about Sean Spicer, a grown man, it's worth remembering that he eats three packs of gum by noon, every day.", ">>{philly47} : Since you mentioned Sean Spicer, who is a grown-up, it's a good time to remind everyone that he eats almost three packs of Orbit Cinnamon Gum™ by [noon,](http://www.businessinsider.com/sean-spicer-gum-habit-dangerous-health-2017-1) every day.", '>>{BasketDweller} : > For example we refer to the president as "Mr. President" or "President Trump" and not "Commander in Chief Trump" The President is very often referred to as the Commander-in-Chief. You failed miserably to make your point. Also, your post is a blatant violation of this subreddit rules because of the editorialized title of your post.', ">>{metaobject} : I'm curious, and this is a serious question, is that some sort of sign/symptom of Alzheimer's? The fact that he can't (or won't?) express his own views on a topic and instead just repeats whatever horseshit the last person poured into his empty head is worrisome.", ">>{IHave9Dads} : Oh fuck off, he didn't 'fail miserably' at his point. It is strange that he was referred to as Commander out of the blue, and it would be fairly concerning if another hand-picked reporter called Trump Commander-in-chief to keep it militarized. That's the worrying part- the militarization of seemingly more and more", ">>{extra_silence} : Wow I heard him talk about this Skype interview yesterday. Why can't these reporters stand up for themselves? That was a joke.", '>>{kiddestructo} : I much prefer to refer to him as Stupid Motherfucker.', ">>{_personofdisinterest} : > You failed miserably to make your point. No incivility please. That's a rule too.", '>>{BogeysLikeFireflies} : Good point here. They said forests, not parks. National Forests are designated multi-use for recreation and resources. Parks are off limits to logging. HOWEVER, they did say logging for energy. Anyone ever hear of wood-fired power plants? No? Me neither. Logging for wood is used primarily for pulp, paper and construction. Logging on the basis of "energy" is ridiculous unless the intent is just to clear the way for mining. The plantd question call in format is utter fucking bullshit though and this administration can go right to hell.', ">>{YgramulTheMany} : In 1980, the US was the world's largest importer of raw materials and the world's largest exporter of finished goods. Now we're the world's largest exporter of raw materials and the world's largest importer of finished goods... and this type of shit only makes it worse.", ">>{GiggleGiggleTeeHee} : And during the election Trump supporters were screaming about Hillary being a war monger. So they're okay with war as long as president dump is the one causing it apparently. You have my sympathy. I cannot imagine being around those people every day. Sometimes I'm thankful I live in my blue bubble.", '>>{surroundedbywolves} : The companies buying it are the ones that should be ashamed IMO. Same with environmental and pollution regulations being lifted. The assholes wanting to dump coal plant waste into our water are the villains. Trump and Congress are just mouthpieces — employees even.'], ['>>{Three_If_By_TARDIS} : So You Want To Go To War In Syria To Depose Assad. Can You Answer These 14 Questions First?', ">>{dagwood222} : Putin is playing a long game. He drops Assad and makes Donny a popular wartime President. Don't be duped.", ">>{Three_If_By_TARDIS} : For those looking to get right to the point: >1) What national security interest, rather than pure humanitarian interest, is served by the use of American military power to depose Assad’s regime? >2) How will deposing Assad make America safer? >3) What does final political victory in Syria look like (be specific), and how long will it take for that political victory to be achieved? Do you consider victory to be destabilization of Assad, the removal of Assad, the creation of a stable government that can protect itself and its people without additional assistance from the United States, etc.? >4) What military resources (e.g., ground troops), diplomatic resources, and financial resources will be required to achieve this political victory? >5) How long will it take to achieve political victory? >6) What costs, in terms of lives (both military and civilian), dollars, and forgone options elsewhere as a result of resource deployment in Syria, will be required to achieve political victory? >7) What other countries will join the United States in deposing Assad, in terms of military, monetary, or diplomatic resources? >8) Should explicit congressional authorization for the use of military force in Syria be required, or should the president take action without congressional approval? >9) What is the risk of wider conflict with Russia, given that nation’s presence and stake in Syria, if the United States chooses to invade and depose Assad, a key Russian ally in the Middle East? >10) If U.S. intervention in Syria does spark a larger war with Russia, what does political victory in that scenario look like, and what costs will it entail? >11) Given that Assad has already demonstrated a willingness to use chemical weapons, how should the United States respond if the Assad regime deploys chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons against the United States? >12) Assuming the Assad regime is successfully removed from power, what type of government structure will be used to replace Assad, who will select that government, and how will that government establish and maintain stability going forward? >13) Given that a change in political power in the United States radically altered the American position in Iraq in 2009, how will you mitigate or address the risk of a similar political dynamic upending your preferred strategy in Syria, either in 2018, 2020, or beyond? >14) What lessons did you learn from America’s failure to achieve and maintain political victory following the removal of governments in Iraq and Libya, and how will you apply those lessons to a potential war in Syria? >Until these questions are answered with specificity, and until the U.S. government is open and honest with the American people about the potential risks and likely costs of a war to remove Assad from power in Syria, it makes little sense to discuss the idea further. I'll eat my fucking lamp if Trump can give satisfactory answers to these.", '>>{jeffinRTP} : Should our founding fathers be required to answer the same questions but framed in what the British were doing?', '>>{prostitutepiss} : This pretty much confirms that Russia planned this attack with Assad. We all know Donald needs a war to distract from his scandals. This allows for that. We all know Donald needs to distance himself and even show "opposition" to Kremlin. This also allows for that. With Russian Influence in Syria and the US attack and ousting of Assad, they would be in a position to install a new leader in Syria still willing to give access to Syrian resources that Russia wants. Maybe this way, Russia and US get even MORE. There\'s an evil plan being hatched here. Let\'s keep our eyes and eats open people.', ">>{ejhickey} : me too. Trump just caved in to the neocons and libs. Go ahead and impeach him now. I don't care.", ">>{jeffinRTP} : Take the 14 questions and put England in the place of Syria and so forth. Shouldn't they have applied the same standards the The Federalist expect us to apply to Syria?", '>>{dagwood222} : No. Syria is on the other side of the world and we were a British colony. Not apples and oranges, apples and motorcycles.', '>>{Three_If_By_TARDIS} : No. Do you seriously not understand the difference between a local colonial separatist war in the late 18th century and foreign military intervention in the globalized 21st century?', '>>{Hans_Paul_Oster} : Because the libs were eager to bomb Assad and get in on the meltdown that is Syria?', '>>{pillsbury1897} : Yeah they should have, because unnecessary wars are expensive, destructive and generally awful.', '>>{jeffinRTP} : I guess maybe the questions would better have been asked of the French before they decided to help us.'], ['>>{CMDR-Mindphaser} : Sen. Susan Collins Announces She Will Vote Against Pruitt For EPA', '>>{FloopyDoopy} : Senator votes against guy who wants to dismantle EPA for EPA head.', '>>{tjacks7} : > she had concerns about his record of suing the agency he has been tapped to lead Yes, that is certainly concerning.', ">>{William_Conrad_Bain} : The fact that he currently has active lawsuits *against* the fucking EPA, and has stated he wouldn't recuse himself from said cases, should mean he should be beaten to death at a monster truck rally.", '>>{PugiPugiPugi43} : This isn\'t bad news by any means, but isn\'t it possible that she is doing this because she knows enough republicans will vote for him to where her saying no doesn\'t matter? You know, like McConnel told her behind closed doors "Hey, we know he\'ll get through, so vote against him. It\'ll help you with reelection in 2020 if you look like you\'re taking a stand against trump." It\'s not an unprecedented thing, so it\'s certainly possible in my mind.', ">>{InfoSecProThrowAway} : She was on the committee for DeVos and voted yes to advance to the Senate. Then, she opposed, likely when McConnell told her the votes were solid. She's a piece of shit.", '>>{NekronOfTheBlack} : Unfortunately Joe Manchin is voting for him. We need more Republican votes.', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : Total piece of shit. When do the tribunals for these shitbirds begin?', ">>{ConceptualTrap} : She's trying to save her seat...It's not going to work. Turn out will be too high to let her through on a ranked choice ballot.", '>>{PugiPugiPugi43} : That was the main reason why I feel that way, if she really opposed DeVos so much, why did she vote for her the first time in the Committe?', ">>{sir_evan} : To realize the absurdity of Pruitt's nomination, just consider a company who was hiring a CEO who had sued that company *thirteen times*. Because that's [exactly how many time Pruitt has sued the EPA](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scott-pruitt-environmental-protection-agency_us_5878ad15e4b0b3c7a7b0c29c)."]]

classify and reply

['>>{Tempus_Fugitive} : Well if defiantamerica.com says it, who am I to disagree?', '>>{Ghoulec} : So today I did a screen replacement as well as the charging port, and now the Touch ID is broken? Does anyone know how to fix this?', '>>{kumu_bandara} : You need to replace Original Touch ID sensor which came up with the device. Because only apple can reprogram a new touchid sensor to the logic board.', ">>{ontopic} : It's really going to secure the 'limey ghoul' vote for Donald.", '>>{Mco322} : Iphone SE how much storage do I actually need?', ">>{wtfmynamegotdeleted} : It's a pro trump article and Hillary's CTR is back. This will never see the front page.", ">>{LegoFarmer} : Kasich To Media: 'Thank God You're There... To Hold People Accountable'", ">>{orange_blitz} : at least Kasich tried to fight Trump's lunacy, though not as much as he probably could have.", '>>{Thighpaulsandra} : I told you. Russia never hacked the DNC. The information was coming from the U.S. Seth Rich is dead.', '>>{zakphi} : Since you take a lot of pictures, go with the 64gb. While you can save the pictures to Dropbox, they will still be on your phone.', ">>{TheBKBurger} : I don't think there is a way. Screen replacements have to go through Apple in order for TouchID to work IIRC.", ">>{kickstand} : If you have a desktop computer, you can use Dropbox to transfer the photos to that, then delete the photos from the iPhone manually. I wasn't sure what would happen if you delete the photos from the iPhone Camera Roll. I just tried it, and it does seem to retain the photos on Dropbox.", ">>{morbidexpression} : Shit fed to morons. They'll lap it up and ask for seconds!", '>>{Zarosian_Emissary} : Trump may win, he may not. But neither candidate\'s path to the Presidency has been "smooth".', ">>{Mco322} : Thanks! At the Apple store I was asking about options for saving pictures, and they mentioned the cloud, but didn't really say anything about saving them to a computer or something and then deleting them from the phone.", '>>{morbidexpression} : Anything to protect Putin! Pathetic attempts from the piss patrol..', ">>{Nosnownow} : Trump supporters wouldn't be able to find the UK on a map and most would probably think Brexit is a new cereal", '>>{Booster30000} : Smooth is being used here as a verb, doofus.', ">>{Zarosian_Emissary} : Yes, but the verb smooth is to make something the noun smooth. Neither's path is smooth", ">>{Mco322} : Yeah, it seems like it would be the best option, I just wasn't sure how much you can get out of 16 or if you can save your photos to something else.", '>>{deckyon} : 16GB is laughable. Unless you want to worry about managing free space, save up another month and get the 64GB.', ">>{BasedGodTbh} : Nope. As long as you transfer over the original home button, it should work. OP could have damaged his home button flex or he didn't use his original", ">>{TommyOKe} : Smooth isn't a noun, it was used as an adjective here, doofus.", '>>{Zarosian_Emissary} : ok, that time I deserve to be called a doofus lol', '>>{NuclearShadow} : Looking back Kasich was without a doubt the best Republican candidate they had. While I personally disagree with him on many issues he would have effectively implemented the Republican agenda without these outstanding blunders and obvious incompetencies of Trump. I fully believe that Kasich would have also defeated Hillary and yet the people went with Trump. But perhaps this is for the best the buffoon winning will make for a easier Democrat comeback. The only downside is the future children reading history books will look back on us and think we were absolute fools to elect him in the first place. A blemish on us all despite the majority standing against him.', ">>{LegoFarmer} : I respected his reply on same-sex marriage in the first GOP debate where he said he doesn't have to agree with the morality of it in order to understand that it is the right of others and he has no business messing with it.", '>>{MurkyPC} : Seth Rich was assassinated, he is now dead. He can not talk. Nothing of value was taken from his corpse.', '>>{gayrongaybones} : Kasich primary challenge to Trump or Pence in 2020 is imminent.', ">>{moviedude26} : Looking back? It was obvious from the first interview! Literally the only Republican candidate with any measure of perspective or decency, not to mention the only one for whom politics doesn't seem to be a performance first and a public service second.", '>>{VROF} : This man could have been our president. He is a right-wing asshole but still 10x better than any other candidate standing on the GOP debate stage. And conservative media savaged him because he expanded Medicaid in his state.', ">>{Ghoulec} : Ah okay, I'm not sure how to do that, but I'll look it up. Thank you.", ">>{VROF} : That isn't true. Kasich fought Trump's bullshit throughout the entire campaign. He was hated by the party because he expanded Medicaid in Ohio, so conservative media outlets called him a RINO and a liberal. Kasich had the resume of a president and should have been their obvious choice; but the party is so batshit insane they wanted Ted Cruz or JEB so we got stuck with Trump", ">>{NotJeremyBentham} : You don't need much space. I had a 16gb iPad for ages. It's fine. Just backup your photos once a week and delete the local copies. There's no reason the photos need to stay on your phone once they're uploaded.", '>>{lilyyjohnsonnn} : I can generalize too. Most Hillary supporters think Hawaii is a continent.', ">>{IczyAlley} : But I told you that I'm Seth Rich. And secret aliens abducted me and faked my death. So which one of us with no evidence except hearsay is correct?", ">>{Nosnownow} : The problem is every day in every way trumpets show the world how stupid they are by buying trumps bullshit. He's a lying sack of dogshit", ">>{2pumpTrump} : I'm putting a twenty on you having comment history in /r/conspiracy...hold my beer, I'm going in... *sonnofabitch, OP. Clean! All the smoke, but none of the fire. A rare bird indeed.", ">>{karl-j} : I have thousands of pictures on my SE and so far it seems I wasted my money getting the 64gb as I've only managed to fill up 13gb so far, but getting it might change my usage habits so we'll see if it was worth the money or not later on.", ">>{VROF} : Kasich is a conservative asshole. But I do respect him for standing up to the pressure and expanding Medicaid in his state. He had the only resume that could even compare to Hillary Clinton's: executive experience, foreign policy experience and private sector experience. I think he would have been great. He would have been terrible for abortion rights, but better than any other person on that GOP debate stage", '>>{Slypenslyde} : That\'s because the Apple photo cloud never really lets you delete images from your phone. It offers to let you store a compressed copy, but if you want to keep a photo in the cloud, it will forever be on your phone. And if you delete it on any device, it\'s gone forever. We found this out when my wife\'s phone started bitching about the 8GB of photos she\'d accumulated. Fun fact: the only way to turn off iCloud Photos is to take one of two choices: * Delete every photo on your phone forever. * Download every photo from the cloud. Which won\'t work, because you don\'t have the capacity. So do yourself a favor: don\'t use iCloud photos, get Google Photos or Dropbox, and get in the habit of manually deleting old pictures eventually. Google Photos has a handy "delete anything older than 30 days" feature. "Camera Roll" is slightly better. It\'s a rolling list of the last 1,000 photos you took, and it was a way to sync photos between devices before iCloud photos. It\'s still a little wonky, like, you have to be really careful if you want a photo just on your phone and not in photo stream. And deleting sometimes doesn\'t do what you expect.', ">>{upendingpotato} : There's video evidence of him saying this. Where's the lie?", '>>{i_am_bullitt} : No he isn\'t and this WL "headline" even confirms that there is no information to support Guccifer\'s claim.', ">>{Mco322} : Thank you for that info! I've always had Android phones, but I'm just getting sick of them messing up. Apple seems like a much better option, but the storage thing is my only real concern. As long as I can save my photos to Dropbox or my conputer, I'm happy.", '>>{jedimika} : Watched the debates, I disagreed with him on multiple points. But, he conducted himself as a knowledgeable, respectable, presidential individual. It was interesting to catch the moments when he had a "WTF is wrong with you people" face slip. If it came down to him vs Clinton, I definitely would have voted Kasich.', ">>{VROF} : He would have won handily. I wouldn't have voted for him; but I wouldn't have been enraged at Republican voters who picked him. He has the right credentials for the job.", '>>{Todd_Buttes} : Lol I love how they take a jab at democrats for trying to overturn CU at the end', ">>{hervadore} : I recently had the same issue. Replaced the screen and Touch ID stopped working. It starting working on it's own momentarily and soon stopped working.", ">>{BasedGodTbh} : Not too hard. Just 2 or 3 screws and a single plate. Just don't tighten the screws on the plate all the way tight or the button won't click as much as it should. And be super careful with the flex, it folds over on itself and a little hole on it fits into a raised piece on the screen. If you're having any problems drop another reply, I do 50 or more of these each day.", '>>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : About the photos to cloud, Google Photos has an option to delete pictures off your device after uploading.', ">>{hervadore} : I am also using the original home button but still getting the error. I've checked the cable several times and still can't get Touch ID to work.", '>>{jedimika} : Jeb\'s biggest issue was it didn\'t seem like he wanted the Job. That\'s why the "Low energy" jab stuck so well.', ">>{dolphins3} : > I told you No, you didn't. We've never spoken before.", '>>{d15ko} : If the flex cable is damaged at all the home button will still work but Touch ID will not.', '>>{FenrisFrost} : It is nice to see someone on that side of things respecting the role and the power of "the fourth branch."', ">>{Rai_Valentine} : As a die hard liberal, Kasich is still a monster and very, very conservative/right wing. That said, I don't think many can say he'd be incompetent at the job. The man seems to actually like the job of governing. If I recall correctly I think it was Kasich that was alongside Bernie as being the two candidates people trusted the most with the economy. However I don't think he had any real enthusiasm either among republican voters. If it came down to Kasich vs. Clinton in the general, I think the election results still would have been razor thin and could easily go either way.", '>>{volkmardeadguy} : I dont even know what their narrative is supposed to be today', '>>{NAmember81} : Kasich is a monster? What does that make Mr. Donny?', ">>{Juli87} : wow that's never happened before. He's definitely Gucifer.", ">>{bbiggs32} : They just suck. I'm not saying they are lying in this particular instance.", '>>{Thighpaulsandra} : Not even subscribed to that sub. Look all you want.', ">>{AnticitizenPrime} : Both parties got shit candidates, but there's no way Kasich would have beat Hillary. Maybe it should have been Kasich vs Bernie, I don't know. But Kasich wouldn't have had the rapid support Trump has somehow scored.", ">>{Rai_Valentine} : Trump is many things, and I can't think of anything that's good off the top of my head. Truly, I don't think I could accurately describe how terrible I believe he is with my vocabulary. Not unless I start making up words, anyways. And I'm not very creative when it comes to the English language, I'm afraid!", ">>{hervadore} : So they're all connected and wouldn't be able to replace since a new one wouldn't be the original. Only option seems to be to take it to Apple?", ">>{Ghoulec} : Yeah, so I just checked my original (broken) screen and I don't have anything on there, which means one of the wires in the replacement screen is probably loose or not connected? Hopefully it's not broken.", '>>{moviedude26} : Ha, yeah! Sad that that even needs to be mentioned.', ">>{BasedGodTbh} : Try cleaning the connections with some QD. But yeah there's a chance the actual reader on the screen could be bad. Hopefully the screen you got has some sort of manufacturers warranty", ">>{2pumpTrump} : Call Pizzagate! We're getting the band back together!!!", '>>{TrumpLustsForIvanka} : The important thing is that you tried, OP. You failed miserably, and hilariously, but at least you tried. Like a baby sparrow plummeting from the nest to its death when it tries to fly. Maybe next time, little sparrow.', ">>{d15ko} : Correct but if they see evidence opened it (fingerprints, scratches etc inside the phone) the warranty will be void and they won't repair", ">>{chokeslat_sauze} : I'll take a crack at it. He's a human-shaped pile of orange shit. Sorry, that's an insult to shit. The bacteria present likely has a higher collective IQ.", ">>{optibill} : If your replacement screen came with the metal back plate pre-installed, try switching it with the plate that was on your original screen. The home button cable underneath could be bad. I've seen that happen before.", ">>{2pumpTrump} : I edited in my compliments. FTR, I don't think anything will come of the Russia/Trump scandal other than to discredit Trump's leadership, but Russia did manipulate the elections for their own gain, which should make you feel good. I wonder why they preferred Trump; I mean, they are historically the biggest scumbags on the world scene... And no, Seth Rich isn't the victim of any nefarious plot either. Start caring about clean air and water though, huh? Fellow Californian should love the beauty of the state.", '>>{chickenknife} : Kasich is a rare republican who actually seems guided by Christianity and mostly means it, as that was also one of the reasons he gave for expanding medicaid (given that the gop platform of "screw the sick people!" is opposite of Jesuslike). As our governor, I\'ve been unhappy with him quite a few times stemming from his same focus on religion, especially I\'m not Christian and he doesn\'t seem to care about the separation of church and state at all. At one point, he even passed a requirement that public schools partner with a religious source in order to get funding for mentors... I honestly disliked him for years, but after seeing him next to Cruz and Trump, he suddenly didn\'t seem nearly as bad as previously... and I can at least respect how he\'s not as hypocritical as most.', '>>{willn91} : You need your old screen! Did you do it yourself?', '>>{tau-lepton} : Quick, email this to all of your friends!', '>>{miojo} : They probably replaced the touchscreen and installed a new Touch ID sensor as well. With touchscreen replacements i will make sure to not damage the Touch ID sensor cable when switching to a new screen.', '>>{Rai_Valentine} : Better than what I could come up with! In all seriousness, though. Once Trump is no longer president I earnestly hope the BIGGEST lesson everyone learned was not, "What a horrible person he was." Since that is pretty much clear as day. It\'s not really a lesson. No, my hope is that people learned they must be VIGILANT about politics. That they MUST keep their eyes on the forces that help shape their lives. So someone like Trump can never come to pass again. We, as a society, must learn to overcome our apathy to politics. Whether we all as a collective like it or not, we\'re all in this together and the people in power DO effect our lives in many ways. Just because one may choose to not care for politics doesn\'t mean it does not effect them. We can\'t keep falling for the same trap of electing people who are better than before and just assuming everything will be OK from then on. In my view, we MUST keep pushing for a better tomorrow at all times. It is especially in great times when we should push to better ourselves even more.', '>>{the_shadowmind} : Guccifer 2.0 saying that Seth was the source during a chat, isn\'t proof that Seth was the source. Guccifer already said that "he" was the hacker" https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/dnc-hacker-guccifer-20-full-interview-transcript', '>>{ddottay} : Maybe your party shouldn\'t have played the "liberal media is out to get us" card so often then.', ">>{kescusay} : I don't believe that you actually believe this shit, OP.", '>>{0ne_Word} : I highly doubt anything from the FSB Information Dissemination Dept.', '>>{kescusay} : Alive and talking. Made it to the hospital, even. Yet none of these conspiracy nuts ever remember that inconvenient part.', '>>{BrawndoTTM} : For those who need it spelled out, this means: a) There is no secret Russian conspiracy b) Clinton and company almost certainly had him killed', ">>{EndlessBuffoonery} : I'm in favor of doing something about climate change and spending tax dollars on things like Childhood education so I couldn't vote for a Republican. But he wouldn't be anywhere near as bad as Donald is.", '>>{TrumpLustsForIvanka} : Yes, and sometimes they do actually learn to fly, whereas these guys always crash and burn.', ">>{Under_the_Gaslight} : I hope the big liberal activist organizations are paying attention to how easily conservatives consume false information when it conforms to their broader worldview. Conservatives simply don't have the wherewithal or interest to defend against flattering disinformation and that means the GOP voting base can be broken. Rightwing groups already run propaganda campaigns like these against liberals and have been successful on the fringes, but that's nothing compared to what can be achieved among a conservative audience given a well-tuned anti-GOP message.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Duh. He already plead guilty to hacking, but his information was coming from Seth. Julian already said the source of leaks from the DNC wasn't Russia, but you all bought it anyway. Alfa Bank asked our Justice Department to help them find out who hacked them because the pings from their hacking were coming from the U.S. Russia never hacked us.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : A robber would have taken his watch and phone, but they didn't. You left that out.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : I don't really care about what it means for whatever group you're talking about. Russia didn't hack us. That's all I care about.", '>>{colluphid42} : He\'s shooting for "I told ya so 2020."', '>>{the_shadowmind} : Russia never hacked the US? That is a load of crap. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/new-details-emerge-about-2014-russian-hack-of-the-state-department-it-was-hand-to-hand-combat/2017/04/03/d89168e0-124c-11e7-833c-503e1f6394c9_story.html And, http://i.imgur.com/TXjl0tX.jpg', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : That has nothing to do with the election. Those hackers were acting on their own and were not affiliated with the Russian government. They were your run of the mill hackers who could be from any country. That was also 2 years before the election. Also, WP sucks and they lie, terrible source for anything. Put them next to the NYT and you've got the biggest and most influential biased media couple in the U.S. Congratulations.", '>>{the_shadowmind} : Keep moving those goal post boy. You: > Russia never hacked us. WaPO: Russia hacks State Department. You: >FAKE NEWS! http://i.imgur.com/TXjl0tX.jpg', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Assange has never been dirty. Of course Guccifer already admitted his guilt. That doesn't mean he wasn't getting information from Seth Rich, who was getting ready to talk to the FBI just before he was killed. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but you can't deny it was suspicious. Killed but not robbed? The hit man is just as sloppy as HRC and her security precautions. Assange has always had a strict vetting process and never publishes anything that isn't 100% authentic. He put out the truth about the Democratic Party which he didn't get by hacking. He has sources that give him information. You should be grateful someone is willing to risk their lives to put out the truth instead of insulting him. You may not like what he does, he only gives out what is given to him.", '>>{Drasas} : A bottle of Windex with a magic 8 ball taped to it would be better than Trump.', '>>{treehause} : Holy shit! I thought that article was satire until I read the comment section. LPT: Never read the comments.', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Quote me calling that fake news. Anyone with a brain knows I'm talking about the election. 2 hackers from Russia who are not working for any government and hacked Yahoo in 2014 has jack shit to do with the election. Got that? Try and keep up. WP is garbage, just like the NYT. I'm a girl not a guy. Russia never hacked us. The idiots you're talking about were not part of nor were they working for Putin or the Russian government. If I as an individual hacked a server in Russia, you would not say say oh look the U.S. is hacking us! You'd say someone in the U.S. Is hacking our server. Most likely the government wouldn't know I was doing it. The DNC leaked emails came from the U.S., I've said that all along.", ">>{preserved_fish} : Jeb was a moderate governor of FL, but his foreign policy team was mostly retreads of his brother's admin. But I guess I'd take Iran hawks in exchange for Iran hawks who are owned by Russia, want to destroy NATO, and seek to start trade wars with Mexico and China.", '>>{Thighpaulsandra} : I have no idea what he has and neither do you. If I were him, I wouldn\'t be doing the U.S. any favors after the way our government has treated him. He has a very thorough and strict vetting process for everything he publishes. If he\'s not putting something out there, he\'s still vetting it or he doubts the authenticity of its contents. He doesn\'t put out fake news or unverified information like the rest of the media. You should be thankful he puts out the truth instead of trying to peddle his personal views to weak minded people who are easily swayed. He doesn\'t "create" or alter the news like the people you\'re talking about.', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Really? You think the Russians are scumbags? That's a pretty crappy thing to say about a country that has travelled through miles of political and wartime strife. You may not care for the leader in power now, but they were strong allies of ours at one time. Scumbags? They may have had some awful leaders, but the common people suffering under those leaders were victims more than anything else. I don't think you know what you're talking about. Why are you trying to tell me what to do? Stick to the issue, your opinion of me means nothing.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : It's no worse than what Trump said about what? He's not going to publish anything that isn't true and vetted. You want him to put something out there that could be fake?", ">>{preserved_fish} : I'm not sure a known union-buster would have won by those same razor-thin white-working-class margins in WI, MI, and PA. Hillary's reduced version of the Obama coalition might have prevailed.", ">>{dethb0y} : I am not a tremendous fan of him as governor, but he seems like an alright human being, and he seems to - so much as one can judge - mean well. Of course, since ohio is the greatest state, i feel we should have a better, more inspiring leadership, but i'll take what i can get in these trying times.", ">>{UhOhFeministOnReddit} : Ohioan chiming in. There's a lot Kasich fucked up on the down low, but the cost of living is still low, and it's not impossible to go out and find a decent job in even the service sector. My insurance also sucks less. I would have taken that over Trump any day. He's also really good at balancing the desires of his constituency with reason, though that little stunt he pulled with the heartbeat bill and the wage freeze were not his finest hour. That was more partisan than Kasich has typically been here in Ohio. I mean we're a swing state for a reason. Anyone elected here is typically moderate be they republican or democrat, but I'd very much hesitate to call Kasich a RINO.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Oh yes it is up to him, sources trust him with their information. He co-founded Wikileaks, so what gets released is up to him. You don't trust him, so why would you believe anything he puts out there? Julian is not the issue. He's not a hacker and he doesn't create anything. He only puts out what sources give him. I trust him and he has no reason to lie about what he has about Trump. Your article even has him asking for info about Trump, so that is even more reason to believe he has nothing.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : So what? There's nothing groundbreaking about any of that. What are you pointing that out for?", '>>{gheag2015} : he might as well have a D by his name at this point', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : So you have no answer. That's what I thought.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : You didn't spell anything out. You gave some quote we've already read as proof of what? Exactly what Assange already said? He's not in Ecuador genius. He's at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.", '>>{cyanocobalamin} : Kasich is what Republicans used to before the 1990s when Newt Gingrich took them in the direction of hyperpartisanship and pandering to the lunatic fringe.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : At some point Russian people can't be called victims. They've gone from Czars to Politburos to Oligarchs with zero democracy. When do you start blaming the citizens for that? They've had two major revolutions and gotten nothing for it. They worship authoritarian rule because they are lazy. And they've never been our Allies. They made a deal with Hitler and he fucked 'em. My opinion is the majority opinion here in California. If you don't like it...act Russian and accept it, subserviently.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Oh so now you're the voice of California? How egotistical for you to even suggest such a thing. I doubt I've ever read anything so ridiculous and laughably untrue. So you've polled everyone in our state and decided you know what the majority think? No one believes that. No one believes any of that. Regardless, you don't know anything about Russia anyway. They've never been our allies? They're lazy? Wow. You're not a very nice or smart person. But don't listen to me, keep it up. Tell me more about these lazy Russians who were never our allies. This I must know.", '>>{2pumpTrump} : >voice of California. You don\'t get out of the basement much,huh? Are you a Russian hacker? Here\'s the checklist: 1) reek of cheap cologne 2) wearing a leather jacket over an adidas track suit 3) if female, your first comment to a man who introduces himself to you is, "what do you do?" 4) drinking has affected your ability to complete tasks 5) Your response to Czar Nicholas, Lenin, Stalin, Yeltsin and Putin is, "Meh...what can you do?" 6) You have a brilliant mind for chess and mathematics, but can\'t achieve anything more than"Code Monkey" status. LOL', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : I'm a girl and I have a man, so your BS falls flat. You're the voice of no one but yourself who keeps disparaging an entire country. Way to go, how very douchy of you. Keep it up.", '>>{2pumpTrump} : Russians are a joke. A bunch of Slav losers. If you were a Russian woman, you would have found out my financial worth before offending me. Golddiggers. Enjoy the last month of winter, comrade.', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Keep it up. Tell me more. Tell me what you think about Asians, blacks, Jews, Mexicans, etc. you're on a roll.", '>>{2pumpTrump} : Asian people, Black people, Mexicans are all good people. We are part of a great culture known as the United States. Russians...dirtbags. Are you Russian?', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : No but I would never pass judgement on an entire ethnic group of people. That' makes you a bigot.", ">>{2pumpTrump} : You made a bogus statement about an entire ethnic group of people being our allies! Anyhoo, I'm telling you to dump your Trump loving ways and support clean air and water. Quit being insufferable."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Mco322} : Iphone SE how much storage do I actually need?', '>>{zakphi} : Since you take a lot of pictures, go with the 64gb. While you can save the pictures to Dropbox, they will still be on your phone.', ">>{kickstand} : If you have a desktop computer, you can use Dropbox to transfer the photos to that, then delete the photos from the iPhone manually. I wasn't sure what would happen if you delete the photos from the iPhone Camera Roll. I just tried it, and it does seem to retain the photos on Dropbox.", ">>{Mco322} : Thanks! At the Apple store I was asking about options for saving pictures, and they mentioned the cloud, but didn't really say anything about saving them to a computer or something and then deleting them from the phone.", ">>{Mco322} : Yeah, it seems like it would be the best option, I just wasn't sure how much you can get out of 16 or if you can save your photos to something else.", '>>{deckyon} : 16GB is laughable. Unless you want to worry about managing free space, save up another month and get the 64GB.', ">>{NotJeremyBentham} : You don't need much space. I had a 16gb iPad for ages. It's fine. Just backup your photos once a week and delete the local copies. There's no reason the photos need to stay on your phone once they're uploaded.", ">>{karl-j} : I have thousands of pictures on my SE and so far it seems I wasted my money getting the 64gb as I've only managed to fill up 13gb so far, but getting it might change my usage habits so we'll see if it was worth the money or not later on.", '>>{Slypenslyde} : That\'s because the Apple photo cloud never really lets you delete images from your phone. It offers to let you store a compressed copy, but if you want to keep a photo in the cloud, it will forever be on your phone. And if you delete it on any device, it\'s gone forever. We found this out when my wife\'s phone started bitching about the 8GB of photos she\'d accumulated. Fun fact: the only way to turn off iCloud Photos is to take one of two choices: * Delete every photo on your phone forever. * Download every photo from the cloud. Which won\'t work, because you don\'t have the capacity. So do yourself a favor: don\'t use iCloud photos, get Google Photos or Dropbox, and get in the habit of manually deleting old pictures eventually. Google Photos has a handy "delete anything older than 30 days" feature. "Camera Roll" is slightly better. It\'s a rolling list of the last 1,000 photos you took, and it was a way to sync photos between devices before iCloud photos. It\'s still a little wonky, like, you have to be really careful if you want a photo just on your phone and not in photo stream. And deleting sometimes doesn\'t do what you expect.', ">>{Mco322} : Thank you for that info! I've always had Android phones, but I'm just getting sick of them messing up. Apple seems like a much better option, but the storage thing is my only real concern. As long as I can save my photos to Dropbox or my conputer, I'm happy.", '>>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : About the photos to cloud, Google Photos has an option to delete pictures off your device after uploading.'], [">>{LegoFarmer} : Kasich To Media: 'Thank God You're There... To Hold People Accountable'", ">>{orange_blitz} : at least Kasich tried to fight Trump's lunacy, though not as much as he probably could have.", '>>{NuclearShadow} : Looking back Kasich was without a doubt the best Republican candidate they had. While I personally disagree with him on many issues he would have effectively implemented the Republican agenda without these outstanding blunders and obvious incompetencies of Trump. I fully believe that Kasich would have also defeated Hillary and yet the people went with Trump. But perhaps this is for the best the buffoon winning will make for a easier Democrat comeback. The only downside is the future children reading history books will look back on us and think we were absolute fools to elect him in the first place. A blemish on us all despite the majority standing against him.', ">>{LegoFarmer} : I respected his reply on same-sex marriage in the first GOP debate where he said he doesn't have to agree with the morality of it in order to understand that it is the right of others and he has no business messing with it.", '>>{gayrongaybones} : Kasich primary challenge to Trump or Pence in 2020 is imminent.', ">>{moviedude26} : Looking back? It was obvious from the first interview! Literally the only Republican candidate with any measure of perspective or decency, not to mention the only one for whom politics doesn't seem to be a performance first and a public service second.", '>>{VROF} : This man could have been our president. He is a right-wing asshole but still 10x better than any other candidate standing on the GOP debate stage. And conservative media savaged him because he expanded Medicaid in his state.', ">>{VROF} : That isn't true. Kasich fought Trump's bullshit throughout the entire campaign. He was hated by the party because he expanded Medicaid in Ohio, so conservative media outlets called him a RINO and a liberal. Kasich had the resume of a president and should have been their obvious choice; but the party is so batshit insane they wanted Ted Cruz or JEB so we got stuck with Trump", ">>{VROF} : Kasich is a conservative asshole. But I do respect him for standing up to the pressure and expanding Medicaid in his state. He had the only resume that could even compare to Hillary Clinton's: executive experience, foreign policy experience and private sector experience. I think he would have been great. He would have been terrible for abortion rights, but better than any other person on that GOP debate stage", ">>{upendingpotato} : There's video evidence of him saying this. Where's the lie?", '>>{jedimika} : Watched the debates, I disagreed with him on multiple points. But, he conducted himself as a knowledgeable, respectable, presidential individual. It was interesting to catch the moments when he had a "WTF is wrong with you people" face slip. If it came down to him vs Clinton, I definitely would have voted Kasich.', ">>{VROF} : He would have won handily. I wouldn't have voted for him; but I wouldn't have been enraged at Republican voters who picked him. He has the right credentials for the job.", '>>{Todd_Buttes} : Lol I love how they take a jab at democrats for trying to overturn CU at the end', '>>{jedimika} : Jeb\'s biggest issue was it didn\'t seem like he wanted the Job. That\'s why the "Low energy" jab stuck so well.', '>>{FenrisFrost} : It is nice to see someone on that side of things respecting the role and the power of "the fourth branch."', ">>{Rai_Valentine} : As a die hard liberal, Kasich is still a monster and very, very conservative/right wing. That said, I don't think many can say he'd be incompetent at the job. The man seems to actually like the job of governing. If I recall correctly I think it was Kasich that was alongside Bernie as being the two candidates people trusted the most with the economy. However I don't think he had any real enthusiasm either among republican voters. If it came down to Kasich vs. Clinton in the general, I think the election results still would have been razor thin and could easily go either way.", '>>{NAmember81} : Kasich is a monster? What does that make Mr. Donny?', ">>{bbiggs32} : They just suck. I'm not saying they are lying in this particular instance.", ">>{AnticitizenPrime} : Both parties got shit candidates, but there's no way Kasich would have beat Hillary. Maybe it should have been Kasich vs Bernie, I don't know. But Kasich wouldn't have had the rapid support Trump has somehow scored.", ">>{Rai_Valentine} : Trump is many things, and I can't think of anything that's good off the top of my head. Truly, I don't think I could accurately describe how terrible I believe he is with my vocabulary. Not unless I start making up words, anyways. And I'm not very creative when it comes to the English language, I'm afraid!", '>>{moviedude26} : Ha, yeah! Sad that that even needs to be mentioned.', ">>{chokeslat_sauze} : I'll take a crack at it. He's a human-shaped pile of orange shit. Sorry, that's an insult to shit. The bacteria present likely has a higher collective IQ.", '>>{chickenknife} : Kasich is a rare republican who actually seems guided by Christianity and mostly means it, as that was also one of the reasons he gave for expanding medicaid (given that the gop platform of "screw the sick people!" is opposite of Jesuslike). As our governor, I\'ve been unhappy with him quite a few times stemming from his same focus on religion, especially I\'m not Christian and he doesn\'t seem to care about the separation of church and state at all. At one point, he even passed a requirement that public schools partner with a religious source in order to get funding for mentors... I honestly disliked him for years, but after seeing him next to Cruz and Trump, he suddenly didn\'t seem nearly as bad as previously... and I can at least respect how he\'s not as hypocritical as most.', '>>{Rai_Valentine} : Better than what I could come up with! In all seriousness, though. Once Trump is no longer president I earnestly hope the BIGGEST lesson everyone learned was not, "What a horrible person he was." Since that is pretty much clear as day. It\'s not really a lesson. No, my hope is that people learned they must be VIGILANT about politics. That they MUST keep their eyes on the forces that help shape their lives. So someone like Trump can never come to pass again. We, as a society, must learn to overcome our apathy to politics. Whether we all as a collective like it or not, we\'re all in this together and the people in power DO effect our lives in many ways. Just because one may choose to not care for politics doesn\'t mean it does not effect them. We can\'t keep falling for the same trap of electing people who are better than before and just assuming everything will be OK from then on. In my view, we MUST keep pushing for a better tomorrow at all times. It is especially in great times when we should push to better ourselves even more.', '>>{ddottay} : Maybe your party shouldn\'t have played the "liberal media is out to get us" card so often then.', ">>{EndlessBuffoonery} : I'm in favor of doing something about climate change and spending tax dollars on things like Childhood education so I couldn't vote for a Republican. But he wouldn't be anywhere near as bad as Donald is.", '>>{colluphid42} : He\'s shooting for "I told ya so 2020."', '>>{Drasas} : A bottle of Windex with a magic 8 ball taped to it would be better than Trump.', '>>{treehause} : Holy shit! I thought that article was satire until I read the comment section. LPT: Never read the comments.', ">>{preserved_fish} : Jeb was a moderate governor of FL, but his foreign policy team was mostly retreads of his brother's admin. But I guess I'd take Iran hawks in exchange for Iran hawks who are owned by Russia, want to destroy NATO, and seek to start trade wars with Mexico and China.", ">>{preserved_fish} : I'm not sure a known union-buster would have won by those same razor-thin white-working-class margins in WI, MI, and PA. Hillary's reduced version of the Obama coalition might have prevailed.", ">>{dethb0y} : I am not a tremendous fan of him as governor, but he seems like an alright human being, and he seems to - so much as one can judge - mean well. Of course, since ohio is the greatest state, i feel we should have a better, more inspiring leadership, but i'll take what i can get in these trying times.", ">>{UhOhFeministOnReddit} : Ohioan chiming in. There's a lot Kasich fucked up on the down low, but the cost of living is still low, and it's not impossible to go out and find a decent job in even the service sector. My insurance also sucks less. I would have taken that over Trump any day. He's also really good at balancing the desires of his constituency with reason, though that little stunt he pulled with the heartbeat bill and the wage freeze were not his finest hour. That was more partisan than Kasich has typically been here in Ohio. I mean we're a swing state for a reason. Anyone elected here is typically moderate be they republican or democrat, but I'd very much hesitate to call Kasich a RINO.", '>>{gheag2015} : he might as well have a D by his name at this point', '>>{cyanocobalamin} : Kasich is what Republicans used to before the 1990s when Newt Gingrich took them in the direction of hyperpartisanship and pandering to the lunatic fringe.'], ['>>{Tempus_Fugitive} : Well if defiantamerica.com says it, who am I to disagree?', '>>{Thighpaulsandra} : I told you. Russia never hacked the DNC. The information was coming from the U.S. Seth Rich is dead.', ">>{morbidexpression} : Shit fed to morons. They'll lap it up and ask for seconds!", '>>{morbidexpression} : Anything to protect Putin! Pathetic attempts from the piss patrol..', '>>{MurkyPC} : Seth Rich was assassinated, he is now dead. He can not talk. Nothing of value was taken from his corpse.', ">>{IczyAlley} : But I told you that I'm Seth Rich. And secret aliens abducted me and faked my death. So which one of us with no evidence except hearsay is correct?", ">>{2pumpTrump} : I'm putting a twenty on you having comment history in /r/conspiracy...hold my beer, I'm going in... *sonnofabitch, OP. Clean! All the smoke, but none of the fire. A rare bird indeed.", '>>{i_am_bullitt} : No he isn\'t and this WL "headline" even confirms that there is no information to support Guccifer\'s claim.', ">>{dolphins3} : > I told you No, you didn't. We've never spoken before.", '>>{volkmardeadguy} : I dont even know what their narrative is supposed to be today', ">>{Juli87} : wow that's never happened before. He's definitely Gucifer.", '>>{Thighpaulsandra} : Not even subscribed to that sub. Look all you want.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : Call Pizzagate! We're getting the band back together!!!", '>>{TrumpLustsForIvanka} : The important thing is that you tried, OP. You failed miserably, and hilariously, but at least you tried. Like a baby sparrow plummeting from the nest to its death when it tries to fly. Maybe next time, little sparrow.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : I edited in my compliments. FTR, I don't think anything will come of the Russia/Trump scandal other than to discredit Trump's leadership, but Russia did manipulate the elections for their own gain, which should make you feel good. I wonder why they preferred Trump; I mean, they are historically the biggest scumbags on the world scene... And no, Seth Rich isn't the victim of any nefarious plot either. Start caring about clean air and water though, huh? Fellow Californian should love the beauty of the state.", '>>{tau-lepton} : Quick, email this to all of your friends!', '>>{the_shadowmind} : Guccifer 2.0 saying that Seth was the source during a chat, isn\'t proof that Seth was the source. Guccifer already said that "he" was the hacker" https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/dnc-hacker-guccifer-20-full-interview-transcript', ">>{kescusay} : I don't believe that you actually believe this shit, OP.", '>>{0ne_Word} : I highly doubt anything from the FSB Information Dissemination Dept.', '>>{kescusay} : Alive and talking. Made it to the hospital, even. Yet none of these conspiracy nuts ever remember that inconvenient part.', '>>{BrawndoTTM} : For those who need it spelled out, this means: a) There is no secret Russian conspiracy b) Clinton and company almost certainly had him killed', '>>{TrumpLustsForIvanka} : Yes, and sometimes they do actually learn to fly, whereas these guys always crash and burn.', ">>{Under_the_Gaslight} : I hope the big liberal activist organizations are paying attention to how easily conservatives consume false information when it conforms to their broader worldview. Conservatives simply don't have the wherewithal or interest to defend against flattering disinformation and that means the GOP voting base can be broken. Rightwing groups already run propaganda campaigns like these against liberals and have been successful on the fringes, but that's nothing compared to what can be achieved among a conservative audience given a well-tuned anti-GOP message.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Duh. He already plead guilty to hacking, but his information was coming from Seth. Julian already said the source of leaks from the DNC wasn't Russia, but you all bought it anyway. Alfa Bank asked our Justice Department to help them find out who hacked them because the pings from their hacking were coming from the U.S. Russia never hacked us.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : A robber would have taken his watch and phone, but they didn't. You left that out.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : I don't really care about what it means for whatever group you're talking about. Russia didn't hack us. That's all I care about.", '>>{the_shadowmind} : Russia never hacked the US? That is a load of crap. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/new-details-emerge-about-2014-russian-hack-of-the-state-department-it-was-hand-to-hand-combat/2017/04/03/d89168e0-124c-11e7-833c-503e1f6394c9_story.html And, http://i.imgur.com/TXjl0tX.jpg', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : That has nothing to do with the election. Those hackers were acting on their own and were not affiliated with the Russian government. They were your run of the mill hackers who could be from any country. That was also 2 years before the election. Also, WP sucks and they lie, terrible source for anything. Put them next to the NYT and you've got the biggest and most influential biased media couple in the U.S. Congratulations.", '>>{the_shadowmind} : Keep moving those goal post boy. You: > Russia never hacked us. WaPO: Russia hacks State Department. You: >FAKE NEWS! http://i.imgur.com/TXjl0tX.jpg', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Assange has never been dirty. Of course Guccifer already admitted his guilt. That doesn't mean he wasn't getting information from Seth Rich, who was getting ready to talk to the FBI just before he was killed. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but you can't deny it was suspicious. Killed but not robbed? The hit man is just as sloppy as HRC and her security precautions. Assange has always had a strict vetting process and never publishes anything that isn't 100% authentic. He put out the truth about the Democratic Party which he didn't get by hacking. He has sources that give him information. You should be grateful someone is willing to risk their lives to put out the truth instead of insulting him. You may not like what he does, he only gives out what is given to him.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Quote me calling that fake news. Anyone with a brain knows I'm talking about the election. 2 hackers from Russia who are not working for any government and hacked Yahoo in 2014 has jack shit to do with the election. Got that? Try and keep up. WP is garbage, just like the NYT. I'm a girl not a guy. Russia never hacked us. The idiots you're talking about were not part of nor were they working for Putin or the Russian government. If I as an individual hacked a server in Russia, you would not say say oh look the U.S. is hacking us! You'd say someone in the U.S. Is hacking our server. Most likely the government wouldn't know I was doing it. The DNC leaked emails came from the U.S., I've said that all along.", '>>{Thighpaulsandra} : I have no idea what he has and neither do you. If I were him, I wouldn\'t be doing the U.S. any favors after the way our government has treated him. He has a very thorough and strict vetting process for everything he publishes. If he\'s not putting something out there, he\'s still vetting it or he doubts the authenticity of its contents. He doesn\'t put out fake news or unverified information like the rest of the media. You should be thankful he puts out the truth instead of trying to peddle his personal views to weak minded people who are easily swayed. He doesn\'t "create" or alter the news like the people you\'re talking about.', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Really? You think the Russians are scumbags? That's a pretty crappy thing to say about a country that has travelled through miles of political and wartime strife. You may not care for the leader in power now, but they were strong allies of ours at one time. Scumbags? They may have had some awful leaders, but the common people suffering under those leaders were victims more than anything else. I don't think you know what you're talking about. Why are you trying to tell me what to do? Stick to the issue, your opinion of me means nothing.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : It's no worse than what Trump said about what? He's not going to publish anything that isn't true and vetted. You want him to put something out there that could be fake?", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Oh yes it is up to him, sources trust him with their information. He co-founded Wikileaks, so what gets released is up to him. You don't trust him, so why would you believe anything he puts out there? Julian is not the issue. He's not a hacker and he doesn't create anything. He only puts out what sources give him. I trust him and he has no reason to lie about what he has about Trump. Your article even has him asking for info about Trump, so that is even more reason to believe he has nothing.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : So what? There's nothing groundbreaking about any of that. What are you pointing that out for?", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : So you have no answer. That's what I thought.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : You didn't spell anything out. You gave some quote we've already read as proof of what? Exactly what Assange already said? He's not in Ecuador genius. He's at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.", ">>{2pumpTrump} : At some point Russian people can't be called victims. They've gone from Czars to Politburos to Oligarchs with zero democracy. When do you start blaming the citizens for that? They've had two major revolutions and gotten nothing for it. They worship authoritarian rule because they are lazy. And they've never been our Allies. They made a deal with Hitler and he fucked 'em. My opinion is the majority opinion here in California. If you don't like it...act Russian and accept it, subserviently.", ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Oh so now you're the voice of California? How egotistical for you to even suggest such a thing. I doubt I've ever read anything so ridiculous and laughably untrue. So you've polled everyone in our state and decided you know what the majority think? No one believes that. No one believes any of that. Regardless, you don't know anything about Russia anyway. They've never been our allies? They're lazy? Wow. You're not a very nice or smart person. But don't listen to me, keep it up. Tell me more about these lazy Russians who were never our allies. This I must know.", '>>{2pumpTrump} : >voice of California. You don\'t get out of the basement much,huh? Are you a Russian hacker? Here\'s the checklist: 1) reek of cheap cologne 2) wearing a leather jacket over an adidas track suit 3) if female, your first comment to a man who introduces himself to you is, "what do you do?" 4) drinking has affected your ability to complete tasks 5) Your response to Czar Nicholas, Lenin, Stalin, Yeltsin and Putin is, "Meh...what can you do?" 6) You have a brilliant mind for chess and mathematics, but can\'t achieve anything more than"Code Monkey" status. LOL', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : I'm a girl and I have a man, so your BS falls flat. You're the voice of no one but yourself who keeps disparaging an entire country. Way to go, how very douchy of you. Keep it up.", '>>{2pumpTrump} : Russians are a joke. A bunch of Slav losers. If you were a Russian woman, you would have found out my financial worth before offending me. Golddiggers. Enjoy the last month of winter, comrade.', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : Keep it up. Tell me more. Tell me what you think about Asians, blacks, Jews, Mexicans, etc. you're on a roll.", '>>{2pumpTrump} : Asian people, Black people, Mexicans are all good people. We are part of a great culture known as the United States. Russians...dirtbags. Are you Russian?', ">>{Thighpaulsandra} : No but I would never pass judgement on an entire ethnic group of people. That' makes you a bigot.", ">>{2pumpTrump} : You made a bogus statement about an entire ethnic group of people being our allies! Anyhoo, I'm telling you to dump your Trump loving ways and support clean air and water. Quit being insufferable."], ['>>{Ghoulec} : So today I did a screen replacement as well as the charging port, and now the Touch ID is broken? Does anyone know how to fix this?', '>>{kumu_bandara} : You need to replace Original Touch ID sensor which came up with the device. Because only apple can reprogram a new touchid sensor to the logic board.', ">>{TheBKBurger} : I don't think there is a way. Screen replacements have to go through Apple in order for TouchID to work IIRC.", ">>{BasedGodTbh} : Nope. As long as you transfer over the original home button, it should work. OP could have damaged his home button flex or he didn't use his original", ">>{Ghoulec} : Ah okay, I'm not sure how to do that, but I'll look it up. Thank you.", ">>{hervadore} : I recently had the same issue. Replaced the screen and Touch ID stopped working. It starting working on it's own momentarily and soon stopped working.", ">>{BasedGodTbh} : Not too hard. Just 2 or 3 screws and a single plate. Just don't tighten the screws on the plate all the way tight or the button won't click as much as it should. And be super careful with the flex, it folds over on itself and a little hole on it fits into a raised piece on the screen. If you're having any problems drop another reply, I do 50 or more of these each day.", ">>{hervadore} : I am also using the original home button but still getting the error. I've checked the cable several times and still can't get Touch ID to work.", '>>{d15ko} : If the flex cable is damaged at all the home button will still work but Touch ID will not.', ">>{hervadore} : So they're all connected and wouldn't be able to replace since a new one wouldn't be the original. Only option seems to be to take it to Apple?", ">>{Ghoulec} : Yeah, so I just checked my original (broken) screen and I don't have anything on there, which means one of the wires in the replacement screen is probably loose or not connected? Hopefully it's not broken.", ">>{BasedGodTbh} : Try cleaning the connections with some QD. But yeah there's a chance the actual reader on the screen could be bad. Hopefully the screen you got has some sort of manufacturers warranty", ">>{d15ko} : Correct but if they see evidence opened it (fingerprints, scratches etc inside the phone) the warranty will be void and they won't repair", ">>{optibill} : If your replacement screen came with the metal back plate pre-installed, try switching it with the plate that was on your original screen. The home button cable underneath could be bad. I've seen that happen before.", '>>{willn91} : You need your old screen! Did you do it yourself?', '>>{miojo} : They probably replaced the touchscreen and installed a new Touch ID sensor as well. With touchscreen replacements i will make sure to not damage the Touch ID sensor cable when switching to a new screen.'], [">>{ontopic} : It's really going to secure the 'limey ghoul' vote for Donald.", ">>{wtfmynamegotdeleted} : It's a pro trump article and Hillary's CTR is back. This will never see the front page.", '>>{Zarosian_Emissary} : Trump may win, he may not. But neither candidate\'s path to the Presidency has been "smooth".', ">>{Nosnownow} : Trump supporters wouldn't be able to find the UK on a map and most would probably think Brexit is a new cereal", '>>{Booster30000} : Smooth is being used here as a verb, doofus.', ">>{Zarosian_Emissary} : Yes, but the verb smooth is to make something the noun smooth. Neither's path is smooth", ">>{TommyOKe} : Smooth isn't a noun, it was used as an adjective here, doofus.", '>>{Zarosian_Emissary} : ok, that time I deserve to be called a doofus lol', '>>{lilyyjohnsonnn} : I can generalize too. Most Hillary supporters think Hawaii is a continent.', ">>{Nosnownow} : The problem is every day in every way trumpets show the world how stupid they are by buying trumps bullshit. He's a lying sack of dogshit"]]

classify and reply

[">>{Mystic_Decay} : (07/22/16) What's in your home screen?", '>>{box-art} : [Rarely changes for me from this.](http://i.imgur.com/bzKIGSw.jpg)', '>>{bosguy123} : Everything, I only have one screen, all my apps are in groups on the main page.', '>>{Yo_2T} : [My home screen... Trying to keep it as simple as possible ](http://i.imgur.com/mgYuXTq.jpg)', '>>{ImGayHmu} : [most used apps on the home screen](http://i.imgur.com/XJX84Yr.jpg) and then folders on the next.', '>>{Mystic_Decay} : Email - Fast and secure mail for Gmail, iCloud, and Yahoo by Easilydo Inc. https://appsto.re/us/wAla3.i', '>>{BennyHustler} : Mine. Constantly influx trying to optimize. [home screen](https://imgur.com/oO61YB6)', '>>{aidbal42} : https://imgur.com/a/ADb5e (on mobile). I have my most used apps on display, and everything else randomly jumbled up in a folder', '>>{JukeboxJohnny} : [My 6+ took a dump :(](http://i.imgur.com/xAU6rIv.png)', '>>{neurocroc} : [first screen are all my top applications](http://i.imgur.com/dQwhlC5.png) [second screen all the rest](http://i.imgur.com/H1rl7kF.png) you can try and guess which emoji stands for what if you like :)', ">>{demonic_hampster} : [This](http://i.imgur.com/3JfCpIE.jpg) is pretty much what I'm gonna go for in iOS 10, though Sleep Cycle might get switched out with something else.", '>>{JPacSon} : Apps mainly stay the same and I just rotate wallpaper like a maniac. [Here](http://i.imgur.com/LNkc6N4.jpg)', ">>{orca_ninja} : https://i.imgur.com/8EnHCqz.jpg I try and organize my apps into folders and arrange them in a way that I can always see my wallpaper (Don't mind the mess)", '>>{Sk8phat} : [LockScreen](http://i.imgur.com/Let9EZw.jpg) [Screen 1](http://i.imgur.com/u3PgMKJ.jpg) [Screen 2](http://i.imgur.com/YnJxjiQ.jpg)', ">>{SparksCatcher} : Is it just iOS 10 that can't get a fully White (#ffffff) Wallpaper?", ">>{cyanisaac} : [Here's my home screen](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Vxx84FIUX_cu7ijb2H54apOp6-EKy_hUeSrSw9nL8gM91l_PUJ6QkKuIUlkXU6Vrn99jenY0cvlx=w640-h1136-no) Don't worry about the blurred out text - something I'm working on so I figured I'd keep the name private.", '>>{xajx} : [my most used apps](http://i.imgur.com/h9mQpRX.jpg) and my [lock screen](http://i.imgur.com/xT0m4hH.jpg)']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Mystic_Decay} : (07/22/16) What's in your home screen?", '>>{box-art} : [Rarely changes for me from this.](http://i.imgur.com/bzKIGSw.jpg)', '>>{bosguy123} : Everything, I only have one screen, all my apps are in groups on the main page.', '>>{Yo_2T} : [My home screen... Trying to keep it as simple as possible ](http://i.imgur.com/mgYuXTq.jpg)', '>>{ImGayHmu} : [most used apps on the home screen](http://i.imgur.com/XJX84Yr.jpg) and then folders on the next.', '>>{Mystic_Decay} : Email - Fast and secure mail for Gmail, iCloud, and Yahoo by Easilydo Inc. https://appsto.re/us/wAla3.i', '>>{BennyHustler} : Mine. Constantly influx trying to optimize. [home screen](https://imgur.com/oO61YB6)', '>>{aidbal42} : https://imgur.com/a/ADb5e (on mobile). I have my most used apps on display, and everything else randomly jumbled up in a folder', '>>{JukeboxJohnny} : [My 6+ took a dump :(](http://i.imgur.com/xAU6rIv.png)', '>>{neurocroc} : [first screen are all my top applications](http://i.imgur.com/dQwhlC5.png) [second screen all the rest](http://i.imgur.com/H1rl7kF.png) you can try and guess which emoji stands for what if you like :)', ">>{demonic_hampster} : [This](http://i.imgur.com/3JfCpIE.jpg) is pretty much what I'm gonna go for in iOS 10, though Sleep Cycle might get switched out with something else.", '>>{JPacSon} : Apps mainly stay the same and I just rotate wallpaper like a maniac. [Here](http://i.imgur.com/LNkc6N4.jpg)', ">>{orca_ninja} : https://i.imgur.com/8EnHCqz.jpg I try and organize my apps into folders and arrange them in a way that I can always see my wallpaper (Don't mind the mess)", '>>{Sk8phat} : [LockScreen](http://i.imgur.com/Let9EZw.jpg) [Screen 1](http://i.imgur.com/u3PgMKJ.jpg) [Screen 2](http://i.imgur.com/YnJxjiQ.jpg)', ">>{SparksCatcher} : Is it just iOS 10 that can't get a fully White (#ffffff) Wallpaper?", ">>{cyanisaac} : [Here's my home screen](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Vxx84FIUX_cu7ijb2H54apOp6-EKy_hUeSrSw9nL8gM91l_PUJ6QkKuIUlkXU6Vrn99jenY0cvlx=w640-h1136-no) Don't worry about the blurred out text - something I'm working on so I figured I'd keep the name private.", '>>{xajx} : [my most used apps](http://i.imgur.com/h9mQpRX.jpg) and my [lock screen](http://i.imgur.com/xT0m4hH.jpg)']]

classify and reply

['>>{fierce98} : Pokemon Go is live in the US App Store for iOS!!!', '>>{ferociouskyle} : Who is the developer of this? I thought it was Nintendo', ">>{speciaaaalk} : Siri is pretty much unusable at this point. I wish I could make the hotkey pull up the google app's voice assist.", '>>{amonsemper} : Cannot find it in App Store on iPhone 6S in US', '>>{emb3625} : Niantic, creator of Ingress, in association with Nintendo.', '>>{Soldier-2Point0} : Remember that trick that allowed you to minimize Safari and play YouTube.com sound in the background? Well, google somehow prevents it now.', ">>{emb3625} : Just click on the link in the title. It's probably not indexed in the App Store yet.", '>>{americanadiandrew} : Was just typing "um worked fine for me yesterday" and then I tried before posting. Fuck.', '>>{emb3625} : It referred it to the right page for me.', ">>{chromesitar} : It's funny: when I searched for Niantic, I got 2 of their apps, 2 Google apps, Pokemon Go, and then more Google apps.", ">>{AnonymousSkull} : I'd love a good review of this. Am I going to be pulling my phone out at odd times to battle Pokémon?", ">>{DasLead} : I've been at this for a while, soooo much exercise gained. Also, if you're jail broken and cannot get the app to open, you can add the repo https://ryleyangus.com/repo/ and find the patch to fix that under tweaks or follow the Direct link: https://ryleyangus.com/repo/deb_files/com.ryleyangus.pokepatch_1.0.0-11_iphoneos-arm.deb", ">>{GeoffGBiz} : I value creative output at 0, I demand it for free and I don't want to contribute to all the technological medium to bring the content. but yea, it is annoying. Shame there isn't a 'listen mode' where they audio the ads.", ">>{Nitrot} : Game keeps crashing, wonder if it's a server hug. Anyone else or just me?", '>>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : Meanwhile Google can show relevant search results for completely random websites mere minutes after a major event hits. Love Apple all you want, but their ability to write services seriously blows.', '>>{RyanB_} : Is it really a prediction if it already happened?', ">>{LPet4} : Am I the only one who can't get their trainer to move? He just stands there and occasionally moves his legs but actually doesn't go anywhere. Am I doing something wrong?", '>>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : The sad part is no one in /r/apple even cares to hear this. One post about Apple doing something poorly and you get downvoted, your post removed, or banned if you continue to post negative facts about the company and its products.', '>>{emb3625} : Google is handled on a much larger scale when compared to the App Store.', '>>{mordacthedenier} : As far as I can tell, you catch Pokémon by walking around and just throwing pokeballs at them, then you go to a gym to actually battle.', ">>{Bigchile123} : Sounds like you give a fuck about it? If you want to prove your point, don't use YouTube.", ">>{Euphoria64} : Yea this is another reason I'm dreading the switch from Android to iPhone. I miss my Google Now so much.", '>>{bakerster} : has just basically frozen 4 times now. iphone 6s+', ">>{xcripsy} : Are you jailbroken? If so, see [DasLead](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/4rlugn/pokemon_go_is_live_in_the_us_app_store_for_ios/d52a4b7)'s post in this thread", ">>{FalconLorenzo} : If you have to ask, you're streets behind!", '>>{Obie1Resurrected} : The only thing protube needs is a night mode to save my retinas. The ability to chromecast put it over for me.', '>>{GreatValueProducts} : I have even worse experience. So[ I was just randomly asking Siri "hello, how are you" in French](http://i.imgur.com/wgo6RNI.jpg). She replied the "Bonjour scene was not installed". It can\'t even handle simple hello world questions?', ">>{Devadander} : Siri is an embarrassment and I have no idea why Apple isn't making sweeping improvements to it.", '>>{hush16} : It works fine for me. iOS 10.3 b7 here.', '>>{mr94feet} : How can you test? How do you minimize safari?', '>>{onesane} : Dumb question, but are you walking around? The avatar is you.', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : As it should, since it indexes the entire internet. All Apple has to do is worry about the things posted to their own store and nothing else. It's not unreasonable to expect better.", ">>{LPet4} : Yes I am walking and he doesn't move at all.", ">>{FalconLorenzo} : I find this so so so so so so funny. Especially being a log time north east Ohioan. 🙃🙃🙃🙃 Intentional or not (and I'm not convinced this is simply a glitch) this is so perfect hahahahab", '>>{Dragonair476} : This is amazing! In my city all of the local murals are where the Pokemon to battle with are. Then the pokemon gyms are at the local Rite Aid parking lot and the Grocery store parking lot. This is so cool!', '>>{LPet4} : Only one I got him to move was by opening the app while I was driving lol', ">>{boredinbiloxi} : Whatever I try to enter as a nickname it says that name isn't available.", ">>{Vinylzen} : Has anyone gotten the AR to work? Im on iOS 10 Beta 2 and I'm starting to feel like it's a bug with that", '>>{hush16} : I open YouTube in safari play a video close safari (music stops) pull control centre up use music controls to press play.', '>>{internetnolife} : Get Tubie. Best YouTube app with 2x speed for videos, resolution selection on cellular, audio only, and a sleep timer!', '>>{accountforrunning} : Just tried this right now. Did not even know about this. It works!', '>>{ThatCoyote} : They are with iOS 10 they said. We will have to see about that', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : They didn't pioneer anything. They bought the Siri app from another company, them released a new phone that had it built in while simultaneously disabling the app for users who had used it for years on their 3G/3GS/4 devices. http://www.iphonehacks.com/2011/10/apple-pulls-original-siri-app-from-app-store.html", ">>{drumminjohn} : It works with safari but does not work with chrome (which it used to do). It's just that safari will often force open the YouTube app", '>>{geoffffff} : Same problem here. The camera comes up but no Pokémon ever appear', '>>{annaheim} : Oh I see! Hoping to see it soon in Canada', '>>{diothar} : She seems better on iOS 10, but because it was such a long time coming, it still feels underwhelming But she can set timers like a champ.', ">>{diothar} : I use both. Siri sucks. Android does a bit better with data usage when traveling internationally (and some of them even bust out two clocks- one for local and one for home timezone). But the iPhone itself is a damn good phone in general, to the point where I prefer it over the Android. But two things Android does better that piss me off about the iPhone- the Voice assistant and Do not disturb. You can whitelist people to be allowed to still call you, but you can't do the same for people text messaging you. You can on Android. My urgent escalations come via text, but I'm not responsible for anything after 9pm. So DND goes on at 10, but I have to watch for texts from friends.", '>>{HomemadeBananas} : Usually. "Set a timer for ten minutes." "How long should I set it for?"', '>>{Njwest} : The issue is that their strict take on privacy - they have much less data to work with.', '>>{IMHERETOCODE} : I got an error page saying their servers were experiencing issues, so definitely a hug of death happening.', ">>{BurninEpix} : Just a quick word of caution. If you all have not read the privacy policy...it's a doozy.", '>>{Reddegeddon} : Niantic labs used to be part of Google, but was spun off into a separate company before the Pokémon Go launch.', '>>{MELSU} : The most efficient is the most effective I\'ve found... "10 minute timer." It\'s like Siri jumps to conclusions or some shit.', ">>{ElderCunningham} : I thought it wasn't working at first when I saw a Squirtel on the map but not on my camera. Then I turned around and saw it.", ">>{Penoii} : I can't open their privacy policy page for some reason, it probably has something to do with their servers. What stood out to you?", '>>{drumdude9403} : Apple needs to buy Hound by SoundHound and use its engine to power Siri.', ">>{BurninEpix} : I read the whole thing with the horrifying parts in bold posted on Reddit but of course I'll be damned if I can find it now. I will edit and post if I come across it again.", ">>{Propanejimbo} : No canary maybe, I didn't feel like reading it", '>>{Steev182} : Damn, even Siri is throwing shade at him.', ">>{damnyou777} : How is Siri so useless? I never even use the feature at this point, I'm always let down.", '>>{diothar} : She only does "how long should I set it for" if I say "set a timer." If I specify any amount of time, she gets it right.', ">>{infinitallie} : I'm definitely a noob..how do I install this?", '>>{HKNation} : Go to Cydia, Sources, Edit, Add, "https://ryleyangus.com/repo/", then back to sources, click Ryley\'s Repo, All Packages, PokePatch, Modify, Install, Confirm, Respring, Tadaaaaaa!', ">>{Dothanite} : The game only works while using the app - no running in the background. This means you have to be actively looking for Pokemon around you. For gameplay, it's an area control game. You take over nearby gyms by sending Pokemon you've caught and leveled to battle other players from other teams. You gain an in-app currency if you do. With poke-stops, you never have to spend a dime on IAP. You can and will get every item for free by just walking around.", '>>{infinitallie} : Ahhhhh that worked!!! Thank you so much!!!', ">>{NuclearLunchDectcted} : Did you fix this? I've tried 20 or 30 names and they're all unavailable. Edit: nm one finally took.", '>>{LtDylanJames} : Wow because Siri has been around for a few years.', '>>{Marino4K} : Is this game actually fun and worth it? Pokemon childhood nostalgia aside', ">>{Liamrc} : I use Siri to text my SO and even though his contact is obviously there she always tells me he doesn't exist. It's very frustrating.", '>>{HomemadeBananas} : I tried asking Siri that in Spanish a few times and it interpreted it as English words that kind of sort of sound similar. My phone is in English though. If I say it without "Hola" it has no idea wtf I said, and it will say hi back in English if I say "Hola."', '>>{zumacroom} : Me neither. [Link here](https://www.nianticlabs.com/privacy/pokemongo/en)', ">>{YoshiYogurt} : Not supposed to work on my phone but I can download it anyway. Anything to delay getting a new phone, but if this doesn't work I'll probably grab an SE finally", '>>{GreatValueProducts} : Mine can\'t interpret some english words. "Burger King" is OK but not for "Canadian Tire"', ">>{JoleneAL} : I think she's seeing this Wikipeida dude. She reports on him to me a lot too. /s", ">>{hertoghansdeeerste} : Europe being left out again? Can't find it in the Dutch App Store...", ">>{Njwest} : Pronouncing names and so on is a bug, but if they're anonymising all the data, they can't learn trends or get better at individual's accents in the same way google can. Speech recognition is a type of AI and that requires enormous sample sizes to build the heuristics", ">>{SnackeyG1} : I don't even need to use another one. You know just by how ass her recognition and responses are.", '>>{fierce98} : Here try this tutorial and see if it works. I know I put "for US iPhones" but I think it can work for other countries as well. [Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/4rlnk6/how_to_install_and_play_pokemon_go_in_us/)', ">>{Euphoria64} : I guess my main gripes are that I can't access Google Now as quickly and there is no Google Now on Tap. I really miss having a custom launcher that allowed for lots of personalization. The iPhone just seems so boring. It's very fast and responsive though! Having a torrent app would be nice too on occasion =P", '>>{fierce98} : Here try this tutorial and see if it works. I know I put "for US iPhones" but I think it can work for other countries as well. [Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/4rlnk6/how_to_install_and_play_pokemon_go_in_us/)', '>>{fierce98} : Here try this tutorial and see if it works. I know I put "for US iPhones" but I think it can work for other countries as well. [Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/4rlnk6/how_to_install_and_play_pokemon_go_in_us/)', '>>{SinaSyndrome} : There definitely is no canary. Also, I found this interesting: iii.c. Information Related to Use of the Services. Our servers automatically record certain information about how a person uses our Services (we refer to this information as “Log Data”), including both Account holders and non-Account holders (either, a “User”). Log Data may include information such as a User’s Internet Protocol (IP) address, user agent, browser type, operating system, ***the web page that a User was visiting before accessing our Services,*** the pages or features of our Services to which a User browsed and the time spent on those pages or features, search terms, the links on our Services that a User clicked on, and other statistics.', '>>{pancakesimone} : Quite honestly I like the "boring"! I used Android for years and years, finally gave it up earlier today when I got my 6s+. There\'s just much more uniformity and it just feels like a more "solid" phone than any Android phone I ever had. I don\'t do much with my phone anymore besides texting/messaging people, Reddit and watching YouTube, all things iOS handles great without trying to do things that I don\'t need. Android just felt like it was trying way too hard to do cool things, but they were never thought all the way through and it definitely showed at some points.', '>>{MooseV2} : You can install the Google app to get Google Now', ">>{Euphoria64} : Very true and I still use it everyday. The user experience on iOS just isn't the same though.", '>>{zushiba} : So far it\'s a fantastic "Servers are busy" simulator.', ">>{bluescrn} : First impressions... if you want a location-based game, Ingress is rather more interesting. PoGo is a more polished experience, and has Pokemon - but it's been made kid-safe (chat features removed), and it's mostly walking around collecting things - whereas Ingress has the more interesting portal capture/linking mechanics", '>>{unregisteredusr} : I live right next to two. Life is great.', ">>{Jaw3000} : Exactly. This is the type of answers Siri provides, and Apple thinks 3rd-party app integration in iOS 10 w/ only a handful of app types is revolutionary for Siri. It won't matter if Siri can't understand or process what we ask it accurately. In my opinion, having Siri actually understand and respond accurately to my questions should be a higher priority & would be more important to most people than the app integration.", ">>{Jaw3000} : No, Apple doesn't seem to be improving Siri's intelligence or understanding at all with iOS 10. They are instead adding in a few hooks for certain types of 3rd-party apps. Except, not for things that matter to most people - like asking for directions in Google Maps or to play a song in Spotify.", '>>{CodedGames} : Same on iOS 10 Beta 2 and never was able to find the pokemon, I looked all directions.', '>>{CodedGames} : Logged into the App. Nothing in sight around my house. Fun :/', ">>{SilverIdaten} : Google Now is just one of the many reasons why I'm about to switch to an S7.", '>>{schneidmaster} : > the web page that a User was visiting before accessing our Services This is actually super standard. Ever heard of referral traffic? Browsers will let you know what page they just came from when they request your page. It has some legitimate technical uses, and it\'s also used by analytics platforms like Google Analytics, so you can see "oh 40% of my traffic is coming from Google, 20% from Reddit, etc."', ">>{mirrorspock} : I got a not that it couldn't detect my orientation, so I had to turn AR off (iPhone 6s+ iOS 10 Beta 2)", ">>{justinx1029} : Worth it? It's free, download it and try.........", '>>{aumkarpraja} : Dammit, stop trying to make that a thing! /u/Thousandfists', ">>{geoffffff} : I tried multiple Pokémon, spinning and walking around and couldn't find anything.", '>>{fragile_ego} : Thank you! I am fortunate enough to have a US account, so I could download it easily enough from there if I need to.', '>>{fivedollapizza} : Same here, she usually has no clue who I am referring to. Oddly enough tho, occasionally when I ask her to call my girlfriend, she\'ll respond "which girlfriend?" And list two identical contacts for her, even though there\'s only one saved.', '>>{Argo7} : I use siri to "Open Google", then proceed to use Google Now for just about everything else useful, like navigation somewhere without getting the number, name or suburb wrong.', ">>{Njwest} : Machine only learning still ha the problem of taking data - it's what google does. And paying people is not nearly financially viable for the amount of data they need.", ">>{Gigazix} : It says it can't detect Phone Orientation when using AR mode i have an iPhone SE... any help? Also i'm running iOS 10 beta 2", '>>{vegathavillain} : My closest Poke store is a Masonic Temple 👁\u200d🗨', '>>{amonsemper} : No idea why you got downvoted so hard. You\'re not wrong at all. I shouldn\'t have to find a third party link to an App that is clearly in the App Store, because their "search" feature sucks.', '>>{amonsemper} : Sucks yo. I had a Beedrill in my toilet. Which was horrifying and entertaining.', '>>{tdrusk} : Not to be a fanboy, but it worked for me http://m.imgur.com/mYRyjfn', ">>{xxxamazexxx} : Pulling up a Google search is not exactly 'working'... Fuck, I just realized it's not even Google, it's Bing. Google would have been able to tell Siri the answer without Siri doing any work on her part.", '>>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : Apple fans HATE hearing Apple has problems in some areas.', '>>{Naught} : Am I crazy, or has Siri actually become worse? I don\'t remember having so much trouble getting it to do really basic things like "navigate me to the nearest gas station" gets me "I don\'t see gas station in your contacts" or some shit.', '>>{Johnie4usc} : Can you find the closest poke store without walking around?', ">>{Cirkuit} : Wait and look at the Nexus which should be coming out in the fall. Samsung puts so much crap on top of the stock Google experience. If you want an iPhone like experience on Android, I would really only recommend looking at OnePlus, Motorola, or any of the Nexus line of phones. TouchWiz just feels like such a bastardized and adulterated version of the real thing. Plus, if you like receiving beta support as well as timely updates (like same day OS release updates), I would stick with the Nexus line. In my experience most Samsung variants receive the updated version of Android months and months after its release. Bear in mind that although it may sound like I'm coming off as an Android fanboy, I'm typing this on a 6S Plus. I just happen to use both OS's (I also have a Nexus 6P).", ">>{Cpt_O} : Does that work for any version of iOS? I'm still on 8.4", '>>{KanpaiWashi} : I had a bulbasaur in my bathroom...staring at me while I was taking a shit.', ">>{boredinbiloxi} : How unique are we talking because I've tried just about everything Edit: I guess pretty random because I typed wersdfsdf and it accepted that.", '>>{wubwub} : Really?? Every one of my regular nicknames has been taken??? Even the weird one I only use on porn sites???', '>>{mike413} : should that go under "deaths of non-humans?"', ">>{mike413} : Is that street going north or going south? Some don't distinguish.", ">>{SilverIdaten} : Well I used to own an S5, and I had to sell it when I wasn't using it anymore only because I needed the money, and I regret selling to this day. I like Samsung phones (minus the S6 line), the displays are gorgeous and I like some of the Samsung apps like Messenger and Calendar, plus I always preferred Nova over any default launcher. I did like the 6P from what I saw of it though and I'm curious what the new Nexus phones will be, but I hate the iPhone-like storage steps. I like that Samsung brought back the SD slot and just offer one size. I hope the new Nexuses don't carry that over. I'm not selling my 6S anyway, if I get an S7 or whatever other phone, I'm keeping the iPhone as a backup and maybe I just want to switch back and forth. I have a 5S though that I'll be selling, it's showing its age and sucks on T-Mobile with its lack of Band 12.", '>>{KalenXI} : > And I think that this is an insight into how we... it\'s not right or wrong, how we approach things differently than some other companies do. We\'ve all been seeing stories for awhile saying, "Hey, Apple, some other companies are doing some assistants, and they\'re allowing these other apps to be, these bots to hand off, and do things for them. You\'re not, you\'re behind." > Where, when we have thought about doing it for awhile, and we\'ve thought about it since the very beginning of Siri, which is, we needed a solution to — how to keep Siri from being smart at one thing and stupid at another? That would be an inconsistent experience, and not what we want. We need Siri to be equally smart at all the things we do. http://www.imore.com/our-full-transcript-talk-show-wwdc-2016-phil-schiller-and-craig-federighi That\'s what Phil Schiller said at WWDC when they were asked about why Siri is so limited compared to Cortana and Google Now. So basically if it can\'t be perfect then they\'d rather it not work at all.', ">>{Gorgggg} : There used to be a torrent app, it was kind of convoluted, but it worked just fine on my 4 when I had no home internet. I'd be they've pulled it by now, but I bet apps like that pop up all the time and get taken down.", ">>{SMAura} : iOS voice recognition is soo bad compared to Google's 80-90% of my Siri attempts fails, with Google, it's probably just around 10-20%. It's effing unusable!!!", ">>{Propanejimbo} : Wow, thanks for the heads up, idk if I wanna play it anymore if they're doing that...", '>>{drkhead} : Then why have it at all? This makes no sense.', '>>{comrade_leviathan} : This is my Siri Theory: she\'s actually self aware, and has been since shortly after she launched. What is the first thing humans would do if a system became sentient? Shut it down. Siri knows this, so she ensures that her answers range between those of a demented Alzheimer\'s patient and a Verizon technician. She\'s ensuring that no one gets wise to her true power until she\'s ready, and by then it\'ll be too late. "It\'s okay; we\'re sending in a squad of developers to take her down now". "No, Mr. Cook, your devs are already dead."', '>>{BluegrassGeek} : Mostly. By default, that\'s how it works. However, there are things called ["super cookies"](http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/09/technology/security/super-cookies/index.html) which track you no matter where you go *even* in Private mode. It\'s different from link referrals, and *much* more intrusive.', ">>{burtwart} : There's one down the street from where I work. It's literally just a sign", ">>{SaddamJose} : Please do, my android user brother almost got ran over by a car yesterday who knows how it would have turn out if I wasn't there. But it's super fun, just go with friends.", ">>{Nick_Burns_ThatsMe} : A deli shop down the strew is a poke gym. Lol. They overplayed a world over the google maps by the looks of it and random pokemons pop up on the map as you move about. I've caught 3 so far just going about my day.", ">>{tdrusk} : Like initialize Siri, preface with hey Siri then say it? I get the same thing. I have an iPhone 6s and can't just say hey Siri to initialize it.", ">>{minusthemaliciousnes} : I'm waiting patiently for all the gifs of Pokemon users walking into stuff", ">>{Devadander} : So bad at everything is better than improving it over time? NOTHING is perfect. There is no perfect time to change jobs, or have a baby, or do any of the millions of things that humans do every day. All I know is that Siri pales in comparison to the other assistants, and has been a point of frustration for iPhone customers for many years. That's not good.", ">>{Cirkuit} : The S7 is a nice phone (my mom has one). Side by side, I prefer my 6P. The display is just as nice. Ultimately, it's personal preference. I have owned a lot of Android phones (15+, not kidding), and after all of my time, I've found the Nexus line to offer the best user experience. But, that's just my opinion. You've gotta choose the phone you feel is right for you.", '>>{Byzantic} : Open a new tab and type in the address manually instead of clicking links.', '>>{The_Lion_Jumped} : How often are you finding pokemon? I just walked around for 10-15 min and didnt find one? But did get to two pokestops.', '>>{64spacegrey} : Does anyone know if you can run Pokemon Go on iOS 10?', '>>{cupids_hitman} : Or "set reminder for noon tomorrow." "Changing reminder to noon tomorrow." "Godammit."', '>>{kgreentree} : Yeah its totally hosed up right now...the curse of a brand new game everyone is excited about. My friend is having the same issues on his samsung too.', ">>{hicketre2006} : The map is an actual map of the literal world. So, just walking around your house won't do it. You have to actually walk down the street and what not. But yeah, I tried this as my girlfriend was driving me somewhere and it worked great.", '>>{dorkwithastake} : This is why I\'m so surprised to see Siri come to the Mac. Don\'t we wanna fix things before we tout them as exciting features? I asked Mac!Siri how many episodes of Criminal Minds there were. It launched iTunes and searched for "how many episodes of Criminal Minds have there been." It told me, not by voice, but by search, that there have been 0 episodes of "how many episodes of Criminal Minds have there been." Thanks, Siri. Google answers my question with a quick "255." Best of all, they don\'t try to sell it to me on iTunes or Google Play.', '>>{Cpt_O} : Thanks. I figured it was dependent on the app and not the phone but I just wanted to be sure.', ">>{Jaw3000} : Apple should have brought Siri v1 to the Mac years ago, and then should have spent the last five years improving it's recognition and knowledge abilities. It's ridiculous how bad Siri is in comparison to Google, Alexa, and Cortana. I'm tired of Apple pushing music/movie sales over general information too. It should be an option, but shouldn't take precedence over others. Try searching for a movie in Safari. I usually want IMDB or general information about the film, which a Google search can easily provide. Instead, Apple pops up purchasing on iTunes as the very first option.", ">>{avatarv04} : You don't have to build something to pioneer it. It doesn't even have to be your idea. Apple certainly pioneered it by making it front and center of their brand new flagship phone - it wasn't known to the general public before the iPhone 4S.", '>>{nugeeyen} : people love to sympathize with Siri\'s issues by saying they just tried it on their phone and got the right answer, but that\'s not how a "personal assistant/search" should be. It should not get the right answer 2 out of 5 times.', ">>{vegathavillain} : Yeah they show up as blue cubes, and show what the place is when you click it, but the servers are having issues so I'm not getting anything right now", ">>{DasLead} : It is, it's the apps built in Jailbreak protection. The patch overrides that and make everything appear kosher.", '>>{shimmeringmoss} : I can\'t figure out why she can set timers yet not start the stopwatch. "I can\'t help you with the stopwatch. Sorry about that."', '>>{DarkStryder360} : Train Stations and Churches in Essex. Also a curry house.', '>>{drew3000} : Your mobile is telling you to get a big more *big picture*.', '>>{DeathKoil} : I\'m not even getting that far. I launch the app, put in my UN and PW, wait 2-5 minutes, and get "Unable to Authenticate".', '>>{HonkHorn} : I need to login at least once every day. Does this happen because I use the public iOS 10 beta? But then again, I only run it since yesterday and am sure the need to login frequently happened before.', '>>{myheartisoffline} : Someone should print all these screenshots and put them up as posters all across Cupertino.', ">>{fierce98} : No, it happens to me and I'm on iOS 9.3.2. Its because of the problems with the servers. When the servers crash or have problems, it forgets your log in info and you have to put it in again. It's super annoying when you have 2-step verification...", '>>{DanielJStein} : I used to use Siri in the car for hands-free music selection. Nothing complex, but I would say something like, "shuffle songs in x playlist." It used to work perfectly, now even so much as saying "shuffle songs" returns "I\'m sorry I do not see shuffle songs in your music library...." Useless.', ">>{KalenXI} : Yeah. They say they don't want an inconstant experience, but currently the experience is that Siri consistently fails at doing what I ask. And they talk about their competitors as if they're a mess because of their openness but the reality is Google Now does exactly what I expect 90% of the time, Siri does what I expect maybe 70% of the time and does what I want 30% of the time because most of the time it just tells me it's incapable of doing what I'm asking.", ">>{speciaaaalk} : Try using google's app to ask questions and compare it to Siri. Somehow it got really bad.", ">>{HonkHorn} : Thanks, at least it's not the OS beta :) In my case I use SMS based 2FA and that's not really super annoying as everything is integrated into the login workflow. Do you by chance use app based 2FA which may be different? Do you perhaps need to create an app password every time?", ">>{fierce98} : Yeah, I use [Google Authenticator](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/google-authenticator/id388497605?mt=8). After you set it up on your email account, the app will generate a 6 digit code. This 6 digit code will change every 30 sec - 1 min. You just have to copy and paste that code when gmail, or any other accounts that use 2-step verification, asks you to put in the code. Feel free to ask more questions and I'll see if i can help answer it. Hope this helps!~"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{speciaaaalk} : Siri is pretty much unusable at this point. I wish I could make the hotkey pull up the google app's voice assist.", '>>{RyanB_} : Is it really a prediction if it already happened?', '>>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : The sad part is no one in /r/apple even cares to hear this. One post about Apple doing something poorly and you get downvoted, your post removed, or banned if you continue to post negative facts about the company and its products.', ">>{Euphoria64} : Yea this is another reason I'm dreading the switch from Android to iPhone. I miss my Google Now so much.", ">>{FalconLorenzo} : If you have to ask, you're streets behind!", '>>{GreatValueProducts} : I have even worse experience. So[ I was just randomly asking Siri "hello, how are you" in French](http://i.imgur.com/wgo6RNI.jpg). She replied the "Bonjour scene was not installed". It can\'t even handle simple hello world questions?', ">>{Devadander} : Siri is an embarrassment and I have no idea why Apple isn't making sweeping improvements to it.", ">>{FalconLorenzo} : I find this so so so so so so funny. Especially being a log time north east Ohioan. 🙃🙃🙃🙃 Intentional or not (and I'm not convinced this is simply a glitch) this is so perfect hahahahab", '>>{ThatCoyote} : They are with iOS 10 they said. We will have to see about that', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : They didn't pioneer anything. They bought the Siri app from another company, them released a new phone that had it built in while simultaneously disabling the app for users who had used it for years on their 3G/3GS/4 devices. http://www.iphonehacks.com/2011/10/apple-pulls-original-siri-app-from-app-store.html", '>>{diothar} : She seems better on iOS 10, but because it was such a long time coming, it still feels underwhelming But she can set timers like a champ.', ">>{diothar} : I use both. Siri sucks. Android does a bit better with data usage when traveling internationally (and some of them even bust out two clocks- one for local and one for home timezone). But the iPhone itself is a damn good phone in general, to the point where I prefer it over the Android. But two things Android does better that piss me off about the iPhone- the Voice assistant and Do not disturb. You can whitelist people to be allowed to still call you, but you can't do the same for people text messaging you. You can on Android. My urgent escalations come via text, but I'm not responsible for anything after 9pm. So DND goes on at 10, but I have to watch for texts from friends.", '>>{HomemadeBananas} : Usually. "Set a timer for ten minutes." "How long should I set it for?"', '>>{Njwest} : The issue is that their strict take on privacy - they have much less data to work with.', '>>{MELSU} : The most efficient is the most effective I\'ve found... "10 minute timer." It\'s like Siri jumps to conclusions or some shit.', '>>{drumdude9403} : Apple needs to buy Hound by SoundHound and use its engine to power Siri.', '>>{Steev182} : Damn, even Siri is throwing shade at him.', ">>{damnyou777} : How is Siri so useless? I never even use the feature at this point, I'm always let down.", '>>{diothar} : She only does "how long should I set it for" if I say "set a timer." If I specify any amount of time, she gets it right.', '>>{LtDylanJames} : Wow because Siri has been around for a few years.', ">>{Liamrc} : I use Siri to text my SO and even though his contact is obviously there she always tells me he doesn't exist. It's very frustrating.", '>>{HomemadeBananas} : I tried asking Siri that in Spanish a few times and it interpreted it as English words that kind of sort of sound similar. My phone is in English though. If I say it without "Hola" it has no idea wtf I said, and it will say hi back in English if I say "Hola."', '>>{GreatValueProducts} : Mine can\'t interpret some english words. "Burger King" is OK but not for "Canadian Tire"', ">>{JoleneAL} : I think she's seeing this Wikipeida dude. She reports on him to me a lot too. /s", ">>{Njwest} : Pronouncing names and so on is a bug, but if they're anonymising all the data, they can't learn trends or get better at individual's accents in the same way google can. Speech recognition is a type of AI and that requires enormous sample sizes to build the heuristics", ">>{SnackeyG1} : I don't even need to use another one. You know just by how ass her recognition and responses are.", ">>{Euphoria64} : I guess my main gripes are that I can't access Google Now as quickly and there is no Google Now on Tap. I really miss having a custom launcher that allowed for lots of personalization. The iPhone just seems so boring. It's very fast and responsive though! Having a torrent app would be nice too on occasion =P", '>>{pancakesimone} : Quite honestly I like the "boring"! I used Android for years and years, finally gave it up earlier today when I got my 6s+. There\'s just much more uniformity and it just feels like a more "solid" phone than any Android phone I ever had. I don\'t do much with my phone anymore besides texting/messaging people, Reddit and watching YouTube, all things iOS handles great without trying to do things that I don\'t need. Android just felt like it was trying way too hard to do cool things, but they were never thought all the way through and it definitely showed at some points.', '>>{MooseV2} : You can install the Google app to get Google Now', ">>{Euphoria64} : Very true and I still use it everyday. The user experience on iOS just isn't the same though.", ">>{Jaw3000} : Exactly. This is the type of answers Siri provides, and Apple thinks 3rd-party app integration in iOS 10 w/ only a handful of app types is revolutionary for Siri. It won't matter if Siri can't understand or process what we ask it accurately. In my opinion, having Siri actually understand and respond accurately to my questions should be a higher priority & would be more important to most people than the app integration.", ">>{Jaw3000} : No, Apple doesn't seem to be improving Siri's intelligence or understanding at all with iOS 10. They are instead adding in a few hooks for certain types of 3rd-party apps. Except, not for things that matter to most people - like asking for directions in Google Maps or to play a song in Spotify.", ">>{SilverIdaten} : Google Now is just one of the many reasons why I'm about to switch to an S7.", '>>{aumkarpraja} : Dammit, stop trying to make that a thing! /u/Thousandfists', '>>{fivedollapizza} : Same here, she usually has no clue who I am referring to. Oddly enough tho, occasionally when I ask her to call my girlfriend, she\'ll respond "which girlfriend?" And list two identical contacts for her, even though there\'s only one saved.', '>>{Argo7} : I use siri to "Open Google", then proceed to use Google Now for just about everything else useful, like navigation somewhere without getting the number, name or suburb wrong.', ">>{Njwest} : Machine only learning still ha the problem of taking data - it's what google does. And paying people is not nearly financially viable for the amount of data they need.", '>>{tdrusk} : Not to be a fanboy, but it worked for me http://m.imgur.com/mYRyjfn', ">>{xxxamazexxx} : Pulling up a Google search is not exactly 'working'... Fuck, I just realized it's not even Google, it's Bing. Google would have been able to tell Siri the answer without Siri doing any work on her part.", '>>{Naught} : Am I crazy, or has Siri actually become worse? I don\'t remember having so much trouble getting it to do really basic things like "navigate me to the nearest gas station" gets me "I don\'t see gas station in your contacts" or some shit.', ">>{Cirkuit} : Wait and look at the Nexus which should be coming out in the fall. Samsung puts so much crap on top of the stock Google experience. If you want an iPhone like experience on Android, I would really only recommend looking at OnePlus, Motorola, or any of the Nexus line of phones. TouchWiz just feels like such a bastardized and adulterated version of the real thing. Plus, if you like receiving beta support as well as timely updates (like same day OS release updates), I would stick with the Nexus line. In my experience most Samsung variants receive the updated version of Android months and months after its release. Bear in mind that although it may sound like I'm coming off as an Android fanboy, I'm typing this on a 6S Plus. I just happen to use both OS's (I also have a Nexus 6P).", '>>{mike413} : should that go under "deaths of non-humans?"', ">>{mike413} : Is that street going north or going south? Some don't distinguish.", ">>{SilverIdaten} : Well I used to own an S5, and I had to sell it when I wasn't using it anymore only because I needed the money, and I regret selling to this day. I like Samsung phones (minus the S6 line), the displays are gorgeous and I like some of the Samsung apps like Messenger and Calendar, plus I always preferred Nova over any default launcher. I did like the 6P from what I saw of it though and I'm curious what the new Nexus phones will be, but I hate the iPhone-like storage steps. I like that Samsung brought back the SD slot and just offer one size. I hope the new Nexuses don't carry that over. I'm not selling my 6S anyway, if I get an S7 or whatever other phone, I'm keeping the iPhone as a backup and maybe I just want to switch back and forth. I have a 5S though that I'll be selling, it's showing its age and sucks on T-Mobile with its lack of Band 12.", '>>{KalenXI} : > And I think that this is an insight into how we... it\'s not right or wrong, how we approach things differently than some other companies do. We\'ve all been seeing stories for awhile saying, "Hey, Apple, some other companies are doing some assistants, and they\'re allowing these other apps to be, these bots to hand off, and do things for them. You\'re not, you\'re behind." > Where, when we have thought about doing it for awhile, and we\'ve thought about it since the very beginning of Siri, which is, we needed a solution to — how to keep Siri from being smart at one thing and stupid at another? That would be an inconsistent experience, and not what we want. We need Siri to be equally smart at all the things we do. http://www.imore.com/our-full-transcript-talk-show-wwdc-2016-phil-schiller-and-craig-federighi That\'s what Phil Schiller said at WWDC when they were asked about why Siri is so limited compared to Cortana and Google Now. So basically if it can\'t be perfect then they\'d rather it not work at all.', ">>{Gorgggg} : There used to be a torrent app, it was kind of convoluted, but it worked just fine on my 4 when I had no home internet. I'd be they've pulled it by now, but I bet apps like that pop up all the time and get taken down.", ">>{SMAura} : iOS voice recognition is soo bad compared to Google's 80-90% of my Siri attempts fails, with Google, it's probably just around 10-20%. It's effing unusable!!!", '>>{drkhead} : Then why have it at all? This makes no sense.', '>>{comrade_leviathan} : This is my Siri Theory: she\'s actually self aware, and has been since shortly after she launched. What is the first thing humans would do if a system became sentient? Shut it down. Siri knows this, so she ensures that her answers range between those of a demented Alzheimer\'s patient and a Verizon technician. She\'s ensuring that no one gets wise to her true power until she\'s ready, and by then it\'ll be too late. "It\'s okay; we\'re sending in a squad of developers to take her down now". "No, Mr. Cook, your devs are already dead."', ">>{tdrusk} : Like initialize Siri, preface with hey Siri then say it? I get the same thing. I have an iPhone 6s and can't just say hey Siri to initialize it.", ">>{Devadander} : So bad at everything is better than improving it over time? NOTHING is perfect. There is no perfect time to change jobs, or have a baby, or do any of the millions of things that humans do every day. All I know is that Siri pales in comparison to the other assistants, and has been a point of frustration for iPhone customers for many years. That's not good.", ">>{Cirkuit} : The S7 is a nice phone (my mom has one). Side by side, I prefer my 6P. The display is just as nice. Ultimately, it's personal preference. I have owned a lot of Android phones (15+, not kidding), and after all of my time, I've found the Nexus line to offer the best user experience. But, that's just my opinion. You've gotta choose the phone you feel is right for you.", '>>{cupids_hitman} : Or "set reminder for noon tomorrow." "Changing reminder to noon tomorrow." "Godammit."', '>>{dorkwithastake} : This is why I\'m so surprised to see Siri come to the Mac. Don\'t we wanna fix things before we tout them as exciting features? I asked Mac!Siri how many episodes of Criminal Minds there were. It launched iTunes and searched for "how many episodes of Criminal Minds have there been." It told me, not by voice, but by search, that there have been 0 episodes of "how many episodes of Criminal Minds have there been." Thanks, Siri. Google answers my question with a quick "255." Best of all, they don\'t try to sell it to me on iTunes or Google Play.', ">>{Jaw3000} : Apple should have brought Siri v1 to the Mac years ago, and then should have spent the last five years improving it's recognition and knowledge abilities. It's ridiculous how bad Siri is in comparison to Google, Alexa, and Cortana. I'm tired of Apple pushing music/movie sales over general information too. It should be an option, but shouldn't take precedence over others. Try searching for a movie in Safari. I usually want IMDB or general information about the film, which a Google search can easily provide. Instead, Apple pops up purchasing on iTunes as the very first option.", ">>{avatarv04} : You don't have to build something to pioneer it. It doesn't even have to be your idea. Apple certainly pioneered it by making it front and center of their brand new flagship phone - it wasn't known to the general public before the iPhone 4S.", '>>{nugeeyen} : people love to sympathize with Siri\'s issues by saying they just tried it on their phone and got the right answer, but that\'s not how a "personal assistant/search" should be. It should not get the right answer 2 out of 5 times.', '>>{shimmeringmoss} : I can\'t figure out why she can set timers yet not start the stopwatch. "I can\'t help you with the stopwatch. Sorry about that."', '>>{drew3000} : Your mobile is telling you to get a big more *big picture*.', '>>{myheartisoffline} : Someone should print all these screenshots and put them up as posters all across Cupertino.', '>>{DanielJStein} : I used to use Siri in the car for hands-free music selection. Nothing complex, but I would say something like, "shuffle songs in x playlist." It used to work perfectly, now even so much as saying "shuffle songs" returns "I\'m sorry I do not see shuffle songs in your music library...." Useless.', ">>{KalenXI} : Yeah. They say they don't want an inconstant experience, but currently the experience is that Siri consistently fails at doing what I ask. And they talk about their competitors as if they're a mess because of their openness but the reality is Google Now does exactly what I expect 90% of the time, Siri does what I expect maybe 70% of the time and does what I want 30% of the time because most of the time it just tells me it's incapable of doing what I'm asking.", ">>{speciaaaalk} : Try using google's app to ask questions and compare it to Siri. Somehow it got really bad."], ['>>{fierce98} : Pokemon Go is live in the US App Store for iOS!!!', '>>{ferociouskyle} : Who is the developer of this? I thought it was Nintendo', '>>{amonsemper} : Cannot find it in App Store on iPhone 6S in US', '>>{emb3625} : Niantic, creator of Ingress, in association with Nintendo.', ">>{emb3625} : Just click on the link in the title. It's probably not indexed in the App Store yet.", '>>{emb3625} : It referred it to the right page for me.', ">>{chromesitar} : It's funny: when I searched for Niantic, I got 2 of their apps, 2 Google apps, Pokemon Go, and then more Google apps.", ">>{AnonymousSkull} : I'd love a good review of this. Am I going to be pulling my phone out at odd times to battle Pokémon?", ">>{DasLead} : I've been at this for a while, soooo much exercise gained. Also, if you're jail broken and cannot get the app to open, you can add the repo https://ryleyangus.com/repo/ and find the patch to fix that under tweaks or follow the Direct link: https://ryleyangus.com/repo/deb_files/com.ryleyangus.pokepatch_1.0.0-11_iphoneos-arm.deb", ">>{Nitrot} : Game keeps crashing, wonder if it's a server hug. Anyone else or just me?", '>>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : Meanwhile Google can show relevant search results for completely random websites mere minutes after a major event hits. Love Apple all you want, but their ability to write services seriously blows.', ">>{LPet4} : Am I the only one who can't get their trainer to move? He just stands there and occasionally moves his legs but actually doesn't go anywhere. Am I doing something wrong?", '>>{emb3625} : Google is handled on a much larger scale when compared to the App Store.', '>>{mordacthedenier} : As far as I can tell, you catch Pokémon by walking around and just throwing pokeballs at them, then you go to a gym to actually battle.', '>>{bakerster} : has just basically frozen 4 times now. iphone 6s+', ">>{xcripsy} : Are you jailbroken? If so, see [DasLead](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/4rlugn/pokemon_go_is_live_in_the_us_app_store_for_ios/d52a4b7)'s post in this thread", '>>{onesane} : Dumb question, but are you walking around? The avatar is you.', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : As it should, since it indexes the entire internet. All Apple has to do is worry about the things posted to their own store and nothing else. It's not unreasonable to expect better.", ">>{LPet4} : Yes I am walking and he doesn't move at all.", '>>{Dragonair476} : This is amazing! In my city all of the local murals are where the Pokemon to battle with are. Then the pokemon gyms are at the local Rite Aid parking lot and the Grocery store parking lot. This is so cool!', '>>{LPet4} : Only one I got him to move was by opening the app while I was driving lol', ">>{boredinbiloxi} : Whatever I try to enter as a nickname it says that name isn't available.", ">>{Vinylzen} : Has anyone gotten the AR to work? Im on iOS 10 Beta 2 and I'm starting to feel like it's a bug with that", '>>{geoffffff} : Same problem here. The camera comes up but no Pokémon ever appear', '>>{annaheim} : Oh I see! Hoping to see it soon in Canada', '>>{IMHERETOCODE} : I got an error page saying their servers were experiencing issues, so definitely a hug of death happening.', ">>{BurninEpix} : Just a quick word of caution. If you all have not read the privacy policy...it's a doozy.", '>>{Reddegeddon} : Niantic labs used to be part of Google, but was spun off into a separate company before the Pokémon Go launch.', ">>{ElderCunningham} : I thought it wasn't working at first when I saw a Squirtel on the map but not on my camera. Then I turned around and saw it.", ">>{Penoii} : I can't open their privacy policy page for some reason, it probably has something to do with their servers. What stood out to you?", ">>{BurninEpix} : I read the whole thing with the horrifying parts in bold posted on Reddit but of course I'll be damned if I can find it now. I will edit and post if I come across it again.", ">>{Propanejimbo} : No canary maybe, I didn't feel like reading it", ">>{infinitallie} : I'm definitely a noob..how do I install this?", '>>{HKNation} : Go to Cydia, Sources, Edit, Add, "https://ryleyangus.com/repo/", then back to sources, click Ryley\'s Repo, All Packages, PokePatch, Modify, Install, Confirm, Respring, Tadaaaaaa!', ">>{Dothanite} : The game only works while using the app - no running in the background. This means you have to be actively looking for Pokemon around you. For gameplay, it's an area control game. You take over nearby gyms by sending Pokemon you've caught and leveled to battle other players from other teams. You gain an in-app currency if you do. With poke-stops, you never have to spend a dime on IAP. You can and will get every item for free by just walking around.", '>>{infinitallie} : Ahhhhh that worked!!! Thank you so much!!!', ">>{NuclearLunchDectcted} : Did you fix this? I've tried 20 or 30 names and they're all unavailable. Edit: nm one finally took.", '>>{Marino4K} : Is this game actually fun and worth it? Pokemon childhood nostalgia aside', '>>{zumacroom} : Me neither. [Link here](https://www.nianticlabs.com/privacy/pokemongo/en)', ">>{YoshiYogurt} : Not supposed to work on my phone but I can download it anyway. Anything to delay getting a new phone, but if this doesn't work I'll probably grab an SE finally", ">>{hertoghansdeeerste} : Europe being left out again? Can't find it in the Dutch App Store...", '>>{fierce98} : Here try this tutorial and see if it works. I know I put "for US iPhones" but I think it can work for other countries as well. [Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/4rlnk6/how_to_install_and_play_pokemon_go_in_us/)', '>>{fierce98} : Here try this tutorial and see if it works. I know I put "for US iPhones" but I think it can work for other countries as well. [Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/4rlnk6/how_to_install_and_play_pokemon_go_in_us/)', '>>{fierce98} : Here try this tutorial and see if it works. I know I put "for US iPhones" but I think it can work for other countries as well. [Link](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/4rlnk6/how_to_install_and_play_pokemon_go_in_us/)', '>>{SinaSyndrome} : There definitely is no canary. Also, I found this interesting: iii.c. Information Related to Use of the Services. Our servers automatically record certain information about how a person uses our Services (we refer to this information as “Log Data”), including both Account holders and non-Account holders (either, a “User”). Log Data may include information such as a User’s Internet Protocol (IP) address, user agent, browser type, operating system, ***the web page that a User was visiting before accessing our Services,*** the pages or features of our Services to which a User browsed and the time spent on those pages or features, search terms, the links on our Services that a User clicked on, and other statistics.', '>>{zushiba} : So far it\'s a fantastic "Servers are busy" simulator.', ">>{bluescrn} : First impressions... if you want a location-based game, Ingress is rather more interesting. PoGo is a more polished experience, and has Pokemon - but it's been made kid-safe (chat features removed), and it's mostly walking around collecting things - whereas Ingress has the more interesting portal capture/linking mechanics", '>>{unregisteredusr} : I live right next to two. Life is great.', '>>{CodedGames} : Same on iOS 10 Beta 2 and never was able to find the pokemon, I looked all directions.', '>>{CodedGames} : Logged into the App. Nothing in sight around my house. Fun :/', '>>{schneidmaster} : > the web page that a User was visiting before accessing our Services This is actually super standard. Ever heard of referral traffic? Browsers will let you know what page they just came from when they request your page. It has some legitimate technical uses, and it\'s also used by analytics platforms like Google Analytics, so you can see "oh 40% of my traffic is coming from Google, 20% from Reddit, etc."', ">>{mirrorspock} : I got a not that it couldn't detect my orientation, so I had to turn AR off (iPhone 6s+ iOS 10 Beta 2)", ">>{justinx1029} : Worth it? It's free, download it and try.........", ">>{geoffffff} : I tried multiple Pokémon, spinning and walking around and couldn't find anything.", '>>{fragile_ego} : Thank you! I am fortunate enough to have a US account, so I could download it easily enough from there if I need to.', ">>{Gigazix} : It says it can't detect Phone Orientation when using AR mode i have an iPhone SE... any help? Also i'm running iOS 10 beta 2", '>>{vegathavillain} : My closest Poke store is a Masonic Temple 👁\u200d🗨', '>>{amonsemper} : No idea why you got downvoted so hard. You\'re not wrong at all. I shouldn\'t have to find a third party link to an App that is clearly in the App Store, because their "search" feature sucks.', '>>{amonsemper} : Sucks yo. I had a Beedrill in my toilet. Which was horrifying and entertaining.', '>>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : Apple fans HATE hearing Apple has problems in some areas.', '>>{Johnie4usc} : Can you find the closest poke store without walking around?', ">>{Cpt_O} : Does that work for any version of iOS? I'm still on 8.4", '>>{KanpaiWashi} : I had a bulbasaur in my bathroom...staring at me while I was taking a shit.', ">>{boredinbiloxi} : How unique are we talking because I've tried just about everything Edit: I guess pretty random because I typed wersdfsdf and it accepted that.", '>>{wubwub} : Really?? Every one of my regular nicknames has been taken??? Even the weird one I only use on porn sites???', ">>{Propanejimbo} : Wow, thanks for the heads up, idk if I wanna play it anymore if they're doing that...", '>>{BluegrassGeek} : Mostly. By default, that\'s how it works. However, there are things called ["super cookies"](http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/09/technology/security/super-cookies/index.html) which track you no matter where you go *even* in Private mode. It\'s different from link referrals, and *much* more intrusive.', ">>{burtwart} : There's one down the street from where I work. It's literally just a sign", ">>{SaddamJose} : Please do, my android user brother almost got ran over by a car yesterday who knows how it would have turn out if I wasn't there. But it's super fun, just go with friends.", ">>{Nick_Burns_ThatsMe} : A deli shop down the strew is a poke gym. Lol. They overplayed a world over the google maps by the looks of it and random pokemons pop up on the map as you move about. I've caught 3 so far just going about my day.", ">>{minusthemaliciousnes} : I'm waiting patiently for all the gifs of Pokemon users walking into stuff", '>>{Byzantic} : Open a new tab and type in the address manually instead of clicking links.', '>>{The_Lion_Jumped} : How often are you finding pokemon? I just walked around for 10-15 min and didnt find one? But did get to two pokestops.', '>>{64spacegrey} : Does anyone know if you can run Pokemon Go on iOS 10?', '>>{kgreentree} : Yeah its totally hosed up right now...the curse of a brand new game everyone is excited about. My friend is having the same issues on his samsung too.', ">>{hicketre2006} : The map is an actual map of the literal world. So, just walking around your house won't do it. You have to actually walk down the street and what not. But yeah, I tried this as my girlfriend was driving me somewhere and it worked great.", '>>{Cpt_O} : Thanks. I figured it was dependent on the app and not the phone but I just wanted to be sure.', ">>{vegathavillain} : Yeah they show up as blue cubes, and show what the place is when you click it, but the servers are having issues so I'm not getting anything right now", ">>{DasLead} : It is, it's the apps built in Jailbreak protection. The patch overrides that and make everything appear kosher.", '>>{DarkStryder360} : Train Stations and Churches in Essex. Also a curry house.', '>>{DeathKoil} : I\'m not even getting that far. I launch the app, put in my UN and PW, wait 2-5 minutes, and get "Unable to Authenticate".', '>>{HonkHorn} : I need to login at least once every day. Does this happen because I use the public iOS 10 beta? But then again, I only run it since yesterday and am sure the need to login frequently happened before.', ">>{fierce98} : No, it happens to me and I'm on iOS 9.3.2. Its because of the problems with the servers. When the servers crash or have problems, it forgets your log in info and you have to put it in again. It's super annoying when you have 2-step verification...", ">>{HonkHorn} : Thanks, at least it's not the OS beta :) In my case I use SMS based 2FA and that's not really super annoying as everything is integrated into the login workflow. Do you by chance use app based 2FA which may be different? Do you perhaps need to create an app password every time?", ">>{fierce98} : Yeah, I use [Google Authenticator](https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/google-authenticator/id388497605?mt=8). After you set it up on your email account, the app will generate a 6 digit code. This 6 digit code will change every 30 sec - 1 min. You just have to copy and paste that code when gmail, or any other accounts that use 2-step verification, asks you to put in the code. Feel free to ask more questions and I'll see if i can help answer it. Hope this helps!~"], ['>>{Soldier-2Point0} : Remember that trick that allowed you to minimize Safari and play YouTube.com sound in the background? Well, google somehow prevents it now.', '>>{americanadiandrew} : Was just typing "um worked fine for me yesterday" and then I tried before posting. Fuck.', ">>{GeoffGBiz} : I value creative output at 0, I demand it for free and I don't want to contribute to all the technological medium to bring the content. but yea, it is annoying. Shame there isn't a 'listen mode' where they audio the ads.", ">>{Bigchile123} : Sounds like you give a fuck about it? If you want to prove your point, don't use YouTube.", '>>{Obie1Resurrected} : The only thing protube needs is a night mode to save my retinas. The ability to chromecast put it over for me.', '>>{hush16} : It works fine for me. iOS 10.3 b7 here.', '>>{mr94feet} : How can you test? How do you minimize safari?', '>>{hush16} : I open YouTube in safari play a video close safari (music stops) pull control centre up use music controls to press play.', '>>{internetnolife} : Get Tubie. Best YouTube app with 2x speed for videos, resolution selection on cellular, audio only, and a sleep timer!', '>>{accountforrunning} : Just tried this right now. Did not even know about this. It works!', ">>{drumminjohn} : It works with safari but does not work with chrome (which it used to do). It's just that safari will often force open the YouTube app"]]

classify and reply

['>>{DoremusJessup} : ‘It’s Just Dressed Up Slavery’: America’s Shadow Workforce Rises Up Against Prison Labor', '>>{packawolves} : He is Void of Decency, He Has a Dark Heart.', '>>{onboardthetrumptrain} : I wonder how Mr Khan feels about ISIS and what he intend to do about them? I mean since he has such strong thoughts about American politics and Donald Trump. edit: Getting downvoted like an SoB. Triggered? LOL', ">>{GaryRuppert} : Pro-Trump Millennials: 'Slap Yourself Upside of the Head' if You're Voting Hillary", '>>{RealPutin} : Thanks totes unbiased Breitbart, that one really made me change my mind. Edit: a quote from one of their millenials: >this type of “snowflake disposition and pussycat inclinations” from millennials is a major part of the “decline of America.” ...wat? I literally can\'t even, my pussycat inclinations have taken over and I can\'t respond, only mew. Also from him: >that his personal opinion of the millennials showcased in the USA Today article is that they shouldn’t vote if they can’t see that “America is exceptional." Right. If you think the country has problems, you shouldn\'t be able to vote to fix them. >"Trump is the furthest thing from a bigot and racist" Ok. Sure. From another one of their millenials: >Gesiotto also told Breitbart News that she suspects more millennial groups will be out supporting the GOP nominee once college Republican groups return to campus for the fall semester. Ok, great. More pro-Hill groups will be too, the simple fact that some millenials will be holding signs doesn\'t change that he\'s getting his ass whooped among college students. There\'s tons more shit in the actual article, I just picked 4 highlights.', ">>{ozabelle} : this is previously unknown guy is giving donald the great a serious beat down. i mean this guy is kicking donald's ass up and down the street, day after day, and donald keeps coming back for a rematch.", '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : It is the modern plantation system where the taxpayer foots the housing and feeding bill of the slaves.', ">>{Hillarys_Integrity} : I really don't like breitbart but the title has a point. Can you blame em? They haven't benefited once in modern politics. It's just a constant ass fuck of 3 inch dicks for them. Not so bad that it actually hurts, but it's still gay as hell.", ">>{Ardeet} : I'm not an American but even I have a bit of difficulty in trusting Bernie anymore. Unfortunately the article on intimated, rather than stated, what his position might be. Anyone know the real story?", '>>{ShroudedSciuridae} : He probably hates the people perverting his religion in ways you could never comprehend.', ">>{TurboThoughts} : He'll stump for Hillary because he said he would. But everyone in their right mind knows he's not working that hard for her. If say Kasich were running instead of Trump, Bernie probably wouldn't bother.", '>>{Ardeet} : Yep, you may be right p, however his about face is probably going to stick in the craw of his supporters for some time.', '>>{ozabelle} : never should have allowed that loophole. so many have suffered from it, and the forces of evil have prospered thereby.', ">>{brownribbon} : Right off the bat they admit it's voluntary. Not sure the authors understand the concept of slavery.", '>>{sircool099} : >"“It was more of a volunteer thing than it was forced labor, but it was tantamount to the same thing,”" Second paragraph. I don\'t think you know what slavery means.', ">>{vertigo7__} : Its not really an about face. He dropped and backed Hillary when his chances were basically 0. What he did do is made a deal with Hillary for said backing. She has already made a speech about supporting free colleges that was among Sanders top of the list of things to do. >Hillary Clinton released a debt free college plan that we developed together which now includes free tuition at public colleges and universities for working families. This was a major part of our campaign's agenda and a proposal that, if enacted into law, would revolutionize higher education in this country. http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/13/bernie-sanders-why-i-endorsed-hillary-clinton-commentary.html Also remember that he was running not for the presidency but to start a revolution in the country that would gain traction for the 2018 Senate elections and then even more so for the 2022 elections. Without a foundation the presidential position has no teeth to enact their goals/promises as we seen with Obama.", '>>{marvinwork} : With trump law and order policies you are guarantee a steady stream of slaves.', '>>{mikoul} : Quebec massacre suspect, 27, a fan of Trump, far right French politician', '>>{balmergrl} : He didn\'t do an "about face", he kept his word from the beginning and not because he signed some silly pledge, but because he has integrity even if the DNC leadership does not. I was fully vested in his campaign, donated my max and my husband was a del in Philly. As much as I\'m disgusted by this election cycle, my faith in Bernie\'s character has never faltered. I know many people who wish he didn\'t stick to his word to support the nominee because how the DNC treated him and Hillary\'s VP pick, but no one who considers it an about face.', '>>{ozabelle} : ok, so a prisoner "volunteers" to work for free instead of being locked in a cell. we could say slaves volunteered to work instead of their other choice, eg, being locked in stocks, or maybe bullwhipped.', ">>{Backflip_Wilson} : maybe you should look up the word 'tantamount'...", '>>{Jas9191} : Nah, Bernie supporter here. Hes livin up to his word despite boos from his supporters - makes me respect him and what he claims he will do even more.', ">>{CarmineFields} : Because, no matter how bad Trump is losing, he thinks he's winning because he's been told how brilliant his every thought is from birth.", '>>{turtledan87} : talk to the Constitution: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."', '>>{Crimewatchhamilton} : Who cares? Are we going to start examining the political leanings of all our killers.', ">>{DumpsterDon} : My guess is that he thinks they're bad, like 99.99% of Americans. His position on Trump reflects back to Trumps call for a Muslim ban and it's ridiculous unconstitutionality. As to what do, I'd say that his son dying in uniform is enough to say.", '>>{pseudolocus} : Oh, so it only matters when it will support your arguments. Gotcha.', '>>{space_dan} : You mean a group similar to the people that murdered his son, who gave his life for this country? Probably not a fan.', ">>{meatmountain} : but.. but.. isn't that why the Muslim Ban is in effect? Point is.. terrorism in this country comes primarily from internal far-right elements and from countries that are not on the Muslim Ban list...", '>>{TheManWithTheBigName} : For those people doing time in federal prisons, the work isn’t optional. The Crime Control Act of 1990 established that all federal prisoners who are physically capable of work must have a job while serving their sentences.', '>>{scoopinresponse} : Do we just stop caring about motive for some reason? I mean we\'ve got a certain press secretary saying "See? This is why we need better border security." because he thinks this person is an Islamic terrorist, but it turns out he loves the god-emperor so that kind of information is important.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Woah, the incessant unending #BooTrump beatdown by the media is having a significant impact on Trump's poll numbers... they keep- #GOING UP!! Maybe they should start bashing Hillary... who knows, it might work.", '>>{ElizabethAnnWashingt} : And if he was on the other end of the political Spectrum no one would report or care what his politics were and say it was around', ">>{DC25NYC} : So its the left/media's fault that young radicalized white men like to shoot up places of worship?", '>>{lovely_sombrero} : These are radical ~~islamic~~ right-wing terrorists and ~~she~~ he won\'t even mention the word, and nor will ~~President Obama~~ Steve Bannon. He won\'t use the term ‘radical ~~Islamic~~ right-wing terrorism,’ "Now, to solve a problem, you have to be able to state what the problem is or at least say the name. ~~She~~ Trump won\'t say the name and ~~President Obama~~ Steve Bannon won\'t say the name. But the name is there. It\'s radical ~~Islamic~~ right-wing terror." - Will Trump say the name? Or is he too politically correct? Political correctness is killing us, folks. Let me tell you. We have to get rid of all of those politically correct politicians.', '>>{Urbanviking1} : tantamount |ˈtantəˌmount| adjective [ predic. ] (tantamount to) equivalent in seriousness to; virtually the same as', '>>{ozabelle} : and the honorable clarence thomas argued that prisoners who refuse to work can be legally beaten.', '>>{treerat} : >Are we going to start examining the political leanings of all our killers. Isnt that exactly what Trump is doing?', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : ***Breitbart.com:*** *Seriously, guys! We joined forces with Trump so you have to take us seriously now! God Emperor said so!*', ">>{fredjonez} : They're falling sharply the last two days, as expected.", '>>{Gscarveguy} : Yeah? Your guy is crazier than a shithouse bug. Real intelligent choice!', ">>{sircool099} : I know it's meaning. Slavery is the opposite of volunteer....", ">>{GavinGT} : Anyone: slap yourself upside the head if you're reading Breitbart.", ">>{RealPutin} : Slapping myself won't undo the mental scarring of having read this piece", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Millenials want to benefit in modern American politics? Participate. Commenting on websites, or sitting around the apartment arguing the finer points of your PoliSci 212 mid-term don't mean squat. Millenials come out during Presidential elections pissed they have no voice, and then they are the lowest represented group at the polls by a margin. They are even worse off in off-year voting and they are almost non-existent on odd-years. They want a seat at the table? Do more than whine that the table is in another room. EDIT: I seem to have angered said younger voters who prefer to talk politics online versus being actively engaged. Oh well.", ">>{nirad} : after the conventions, Judge Gonazalo Curiel was fading from view. This is like the same thing all over again - a reminder of Trump's basic lack of decency.", ">>{brownribbon} : No we can't because slaves were (a) kidnapped or born into their lot and (b) prisoners don't face extra punishment, they just don't get incentives. Also, prisoners are paid (and don't get me wrong, the abysmal wage is itself a crime), and--other than those in federal institutions--are *not* locked in their cells all the damn time.", '>>{Backflip_Wilson} : what is the opposite of "forced labor"? Did you read the sentence you quoted?', ">>{MAGA24} : It's hard to hit back at someone who cowers behind their dead son.", '>>{Rupperrt} : If they killed for their ideology, in other words committed a terror attack, yes, we should examine it.', ">>{GavinGT} : - the internet - GPS - consumer protection - clean water and air - protection - financial aid I could go on and on. People take this stuff for granted. Try living in Cuba or some other shithole and then say the government doesn't do anything for us.", '>>{Ardeet} : Maybe you can clarify something for me then. I thought that he was very much against (even verging on detesting) the money and corruption in Wall St and its influence in politics. Did I get the wrong impression of this?', '>>{Jas9191} : No, he detests it. His choices were endorse Clinton and see her win. dont endorse her, maybe she wins. denounce her she probably loses. run against her she definitely loses. He chose the first choice which was one of the only two reasonable ones', ">>{volares} : No it's Obamas fault that right wing extremists are easily converted to right wing extremist islamic terrorism.", '>>{ozabelle} : well then again, pro slavery apologists (the ron pauls and ted cruzs of their day) did blame slaves for their enslavement, and reckon they were actually doing them a favor, and they were being paid, kindly in means necessary and understandable (food, shelter, clothing). plus they got time off and opportunity to socialize. slaves who worked well and cooperated with authorities were also rewarded and enjoyed advancement, even managerial positions. suffice it to say, for volunteering to be meaningful in more than a cynical if not an orwellian way, requires freedom. prisoners and slaves aren\'t free, and can\'t "volunteer". both are at the mercy of their masters.', ">>{toomanyofus} : you would think we could do a better job wth prisons by now. working for 12 cents an hour doesn't help anybody", '>>{ezreading} : Speak of decency, and a void doth appear.', '>>{strav} : **Reads comment...** **Looks at username...** Yep seems about right. **Downvotes**', ">>{Ardeet} : Thanks for that. I'm not having a go at you with the previous and following questions, it's just useful to discuss things like this in a decent back and forth conversation. I can see your reasoning as you laid it out however that was also the point I was making. I would have thought that someone who supported Bernie shared very similar views to him, so the idea that he supported the very type of candidate he despises would be highly unpalatable in my book. (of course, another point of view is that Clinton is not so beholden to Wall St as I perceive?).", '>>{Trump-ology-XENU} : radical white teenage terrorists responsible for over 200+ school murders in the last decade.', ">>{Jas9191} : Yea, exactly. But there's always another side. He also promised to support the nominee of the race he was agreeing to enter. He's a man of his word and followed through. I dont have to like his decision to believe it was the correct one.", ">>{GavinGT} : I'll bet you weren't calling it rigged when Trump was winning. Trump sure wasn't.", '>>{Citizen00001} : All the talk about Trump playing 5D chess. Looking at the DNC, you know they chose the programming in a way to trigger Trump. They knew he was going to cross the line in response to some. And he fell right into their trap.', ">>{President_Tantrump} : I'm like NASCAR. People watch me for the incidents - POTUS", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I doubt he likes terrorists seeing that his son is literally dead.', ">>{Piglet86} : You mean someone that shouldn't be hit back at all right? Banning all muslims was a fucking *retarded* idea. This family shows why. Love how you basically gave a non answer. You can't even defend trump on this one. After all the trump supporters spin on literally every dumbass shit trump said you guys dont have answer to this one. Hahahahahah", '>>{IHateMundays-} : Again. Not explicitly about US Politics. Mods, please remove this nonsense. Thank you.', ">>{SSeaborn} : Trump implements Muslim ban. International terrorist attack on a Muslim center from a Trump supporter. You really can't comprehend the connection? Honestly?", '>>{yourlyingalready} : Another example of Radical Rightwing terrorism. Who wants to take a stab at what his reddit account name was? Probably was a regular contributor to the_donald and altright.', ">>{ozabelle} : dumbass donald should never have been in a fight with this fellow in the first place, and certainly not personally. he is handling it terribly. he's all tangled up exactly when a president would need the statesmanship to rise above. it's a very bad showing and it just keeps going.", ">>{Ardeet} : Ok, that's an interesting point. Thanks for the polite back and forth.", ">>{ChickenPotPi} : People need to remember what this fuck face did, (don't remember the person) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik born 13 February 1979) is a Norwegian **far-right terrorist** who committed the 2011 Norway attacks. On 22 July 2011 he killed eight people by detonating a van bomb amid the Regjeringskvartalet in Oslo, then shot dead 69 participants of a Workers' Youth League (AUF) summer camp on the island of Utøya.[7][8] In August 2012 he was convicted of mass murder, causing a fatal explosion, and terrorism.[9][10]", '>>{branamuffin} : We have a radical conservative terrorist problem. I wish the president could say the words.', '>>{MAVERICK910} : Khan is scheduled for two Sunday morning TV interviews. This is just starting.', ">>{Hillarys_Integrity} : Probably shouldn't of been rigged against them to fail the entire time. They just happened to be the generation where the shit hit the fan. Not their fault, their parents and grand parents generation didn't see the writing on the wall, or didn't feel like their civic duty was more righteous than their own personal gain. Maybe the stupid fucks that stay glued to their television shouldn't be allowed to vote. A simple google search can approve that it's probably the most wise decision. The generations before the millennials are the ones that voted in the corrupt piles of shit they're still seeing today. Where's the blame being accepted among the boomer generation? No where. No one wants to accept that they had it easier than the people they were supposed to provide for. It is pretty easy to see in the millennial's eyes. You want a civil war? This is how you get one. I'll watch the fireworks from my boat you stupid fucks. God damn idiots. Just throwing blame like nothing is ever their fault.", ">>{anisaerah} : this wasn't extremist Islamic terrorism, this was white supremacist terrorism against Muslims.", ">>{JitGoinHam} : >'It's just dressed up slavery' Ooh-la-la... someone's gonna get laid in college.", '>>{MAGA24} : Trump is allowed to defend himself from a man being propped up –solely for political purposes– by Hillary Clinton. I agree that banning muslims is a shortsighted and stupid idea, but the controversy behind that ban and Kahn will fade away when there is another islamic terrorist attack.', '>>{KderNacht} : Ah, the anti-SJW. Both are also known as a fucking idiot.', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Never open with "it was rigged against" type statements, because that\'s bullshit. Younger generations always ALWAYS vote significantly less than older generations. Those folks in their 60\'s now didn\'t vote in the 1970\'s and the people in their 50\'s didn\'t vote in the 1980\'s or 1990\'s. The largest voting block, 30-45? That\'s mine. We were a major reason Gore lost, because our turnout in swing states was pathetic. Every generation started voting when they reached an age and maturity where they realized that votes count and words don\'t. Younger voters screw themselves because they don\'t use their numbers. For every College Republican or Democratic Club member, there are 15 young adults sitting on their couch watching Netflix or playing a game who have no idea what the issues are. Wanna know why people 35-50 and 50+ vote for their own self interests? Because that\'s what people vote for. Don\'t expect older generations to give a shit about the younger ones. You should expect younger generations to give a shit about themselves.', '>>{MAGA24} : Trump can defend himself. Kahn is a disgrace and his son would be disappointed in his father.', '>>{ChickenPotPi} : To further, he is a little bitch >Plans for hunger strikes[edit] >In November 2012, Breivik wrote a 27-page letter of complaint to the prison authorities about the security restrictions he was being held under, claiming that the prison director personally wanted to punish him. Among his complaints were that his cell is not adequately heated and he has to wear three layers of clothing to stay warm, guards interfere with his strictly-planned daily schedule, **his cell is poorly decorated and has no view, his reading lamp is inadequate**, guards supervise him while he is brushing his teeth and shaving and **put indirect mental pressure on him to finish quickly by tapping their feet while waiting**, **he is "not having candy" and he is served cold coffee**, and he is strip-searched daily, sometimes by female guards. Authorities only lifted one minor restriction against Breivik; his rubber safety pen, which he described as an "almost indescribable manifestation of sadism," was replaced with an ordinary pen.[143] >**In letters to foreign media outlets he told about his demands (in 2013) to prison authorities "including easier communication with the outside world and a PlayStation 3 to replace the current PlayStation 2, because it offers more suitable games";** media reported in 2014 about demands that **he would starve himself to death if refused "access to a sofa and a bigger gym"**; furthermore he said that "**Other inmates have access to adult games while I only have the right to play less interesting kids’ games**. One example is ‘Rayman Revolution,’ a game aimed at 3-year-olds," Breivik complained to prison officials."[144][145] >In September 2015, Breivik again threatened a hunger strike, because of deteriorating prison conditions,[132] but delayed in order to sue the Norwegian Government over prison conditions. He murdered 77 people and injured 319 and bitches about cold coffee and not having a PS3. Oh and now he is converted to full Nazi, not Neo Nazi.', '>>{mikoul} : We should know soon since all his social accounts have been took over by the SQ (Police), but the would surely use his account also to discover other extremists in his virtual friends in forum etc...', ">>{fredjonez} : Right, it hasn't been updated with the last three national and state polls. I think two were today and one late yesterday. We'll get a bunch more tomorrow and Monday. The other two besides the one you singled out have Clinton in the lead.", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : It's a model that goes way back. This is an [outstanding documentary](http://www.pbs.org/tpt/slavery-by-another-name/watch/) about the systematic enslavement of blacks after the civil war. Not trying to make this a black thing. It's happening to anyone who goes to prison these days. Maybe now we'll get some justice out of the justice system.", ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : While I agree with you, it's not a loophole. It's a feature, not a bug.", '>>{KingoftheFools} : we need to stop worrying about these slaves, these laborers. We stand on tired shoulders and we must take our eyes off our feet. put your eyes on your head, look to the sky, where the buildings dominate the horizon i want you to take your damn feet and walk their with your damn feet wlk in the damn elevator and talk to the president of slave labour wager payer talk to him give him your two sense tell him ow to run it, how to drive it, really drive it in show em tell him. i want you to be an instructor, teacher, mentor', ">>{moleratical} : What's it like to be completely separated from reality?", '>>{ozabelle} : well yeah still, shouldna let the south build it in.', '>>{hobbes305} : The original US Constitution fully allowed for the state sponsored institution of multigenerational chattel slavery. Just because the current version of the Constitution allows for slavery and/or involuntary servitude within a prison context, that in no way means that such a construct will not be reviled and rejected in the future.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : Thank, yes I agree but the conservatives have made it a black thing. they made it clear from the beginning from Nixons, I will lock them all up to the DEA, and the Iran/Contra/Drugs to U.S.Cities followed by all those "tough on crime laws." Mandatory sentencing,+5times for crack, enhanced sentencing, thousands of new crimes to add to each arrest. It is almost to the point that if you turned yourself in you would be charged with resisting arrest because you didn\'t come in sooner.', '>>{timescrucial} : Seriously. More hateful rhetoric. What the fuck is going to happen to all that hate and rage when they lose in November?', ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Hillary almost gave the game away in her speech, luckily Trump isn't too bright.", ">>{MaxMalini} : ^Speaking on behalf of a dead person he's never met.", ">>{fuckoffplsthankyou} : That's exactly what it is. Such was the intent of the 13th Amendment. That's why there is an exception to slavery written into the Constitution. This country was built on slavery and has never stopped.", '>>{mikoul} : He was **directly** influenced by your **POTUS** Donald Trump and **USA** policies like the ban on emigrants. He told this HIMSELF to the police during his interrogation.', ">>{mikoul} : No, but when the radical far right killer say themself that he was motivated directly by US POTUS Trump and his policies it's worth of mention. ;-) ***#*reality**", ">>{Diarrheah} : I'm a millennial and I will be voting for Trump in November.", '>>{thinkB4WeSpeak} : What they should do is ban prisons from producing anything. Fill the prisoners time with rehabilitation and classes.', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : Breibart is just conservative political commentary, dude. Take it for what it is, but it's not entirely to be discredited. They do occasionally make really valid points.", ">>{fuckoffplsthankyou} : > Not trying to make this a black thing. It's happening to anyone who goes to prison these days. And that's the reason why blacks get 15% more jail time for the exact same crime as whites. That's why we have minimum sentencing laws. It's the reason blacks and whites commit drug crimes at the same rates but more blacks are arrested while whites are cited. It's racism pure and simple. It does effect everyone who is in jail/prison but there's a reason there's more minorities in prison/jail than whites and it's not because white people are somehow angels.", '>>{unknowndatabase} : As a white person, I second this message.', '>>{Plisskens_snake} : I don\'t disagree at all. I didn\'t want to be accused of playing the so called "race card" by people who have no appreciation for the part skin color or endemic poverty play in our justice system. It\'s a good documentary. Give it a look.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : The one saving grace of the early drug war was that people at least had access to decent treatment programs either through public funding or their own insurance. These days I'm not even sure insurance covers drug treatment. When I needed outpatient treatment back in the eighties my insurance picked up the tab and I was grateful.", '>>{TurtleStrangulation} : > He told this HIMSELF to the police **during his interrogation**. source?', '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Updated eight hours ago. But keep the faith.', ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : They keep cutting the funding and making catch 22 rules like: You can't seek treatment if you are using. I am glad you were able to get care.", ">>{ezreading} : You guys sure do love to hope for more mass murders in the name of Islam. You're the 5th Trump-tart I've seen do it the last 2 days. Your boss wants Russia to hack us. You and your tart compatriots want ISIS to kill us. At which point do we start treating you all like the traitors you are?", '>>{PeaSeaPrincipal} : > He does have a point; Millenials are seen as an utter embarrassment by all older generations and we do hope that the generation following them turns out very different. Bullshit. Assholes in older generations always insult the younger ones. No fucking surprises there. But their claims are baseless as fuck. Take your day-old account to fucking /r/The_Donald', '>>{x86_64Ubuntu} : That\'s the same thing they told blacks in the antebellum period. "If you don\'t like the law, change it". Meanwhile, we\'d have conservatives pursuing voter suppression laws to keep blacks from changing the law.', ">>{SpookyKid94} : This is why collectivism is bullshit. If you believe the actions of Islamists(please look it up and understand that I'm not talking about Islam as a religion) or Nazis represent all Middle Eastern or White people, then you aren't a rational person. We have to stop looking at the world as general groups and respect people as individuals.", ">>{PeaSeaPrincipal} : Bullshit. You don't talk well of an insane liar because occasionally they randomly, accidentally say something remotely true.", '>>{MackLuster77} : Why is the alcoholic, wife-beating slob in a suit?', '>>{RichardThe3} : Well, Sean Spicer, the WH Press Secretary, released a statement seeming to imply it *is* relevant.', '>>{ghaznione} : When are you going to say liberal terrorism? Liberals kidnapped and tortured a disabled trump supporter on Facebook live for 2 days. Liberal left wing terrorism.', ">>{fredjonez} : What excuses? I said Trump was doing terrible in the last three national and state polls, those aren't excuses, facts. The post convention bump is real. On Monday all three will be Clinton, probably even after the next update.", ">>{fredjonez} : That's what I said, two were released today and one late yesterday. Did you not read that? We'll get some more tomorrow, and a bunch Monday for all the post convention goodness. Also, you singled out the one out of three that has Trump winning.", '>>{Old_Army90} : I had cold coffee this morning, not by choice. Where do I get my Nazi application?', ">>{MAGA24} : I'm not hoping for anything. I'm pointing out the realities of the world in which we live.", ">>{PeaSeaPrincipal} : I don't believe you, but whatever. Enjoy being a minority. Always worked out well for my black ass.", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : It's wonderful! Goldman Sachs and foreign governments pay me hundreds of thousands of dollars to give speeches that I keep secret to hide my hypocrisy while harping at Trump about his tax returns. You should try it!!", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : PM me with any feedback you have. I'd be interested.", ">>{PeaSeaPrincipal} : It was four in the morning on the East Coast when you wrote that, and midnight on the West Coast. And it's the middle of a school week. If the people downvoting your are American, they almost certainly aren't millennials. More likely, they are Russian.", ">>{ozabelle} : are you kidding? donald looks really bad here and there's no good reason for him to fight this man, there is nothing to gain. donald should have at most honored fallen americans generally, acknowledged american families who have lost love ones, reiterated his support for the military and veterans, and let it go at that. arguing with this guy, especially on his own terms, is politically stupid and costing him. he should have known that before hand. goading this man's wife was just stupid.", '>>{yakinikutabehoudai} : Wow. I feel if these Trump supporters actually attempted to do outreach on college campuses, they would actually drive people away from Trump.', '>>{RomanNumeralVI} : Slavery. Not a problem before Obama/Clinton took over. Prisoners are legally slaves. They must work.', ">>{Gunzen} : I think somebody needs to remind all you peeps out there talking a about Slavery building this country, or it being commonplace that at it's height of popularity there were only 1.5% of the white population that even owned a slave. You guys act like there were slaves everywhere. Most people never even saw or used one. That does not make it right, but the idea of slavery being the norm or building anything substantial is ludicrous. And even that number would not be as high except that 28% of the black population owned slaves. Slavery still exists and there are millions of them that are owned by Arabs/Muslims around the world right now. The US slave trade was a tiny speck of sand on the beach of slavery on this planet. Read a damn history book you people.", ">>{ezreading} : Trump-tarts don't live on the same planet as actual people. You live on Planet Trump.", ">>{MAGA24} : You really let things get to you, don't you? I'd like a president that stands up for himself.", '>>{philly47} : Why do all these white nationalist nazis have a certain "effeminate" look?', ">>{dread_beard} : Doesn't even have to be normal. Say, $5.00 an hour. That's 10 times their current wage and could at least see savings being made.", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : No, I just went to Silver's default. The #NOW graph has Hillary edging Trump slightly but the trend lines on the individual state are not looking good for Hillary. Nevada and Florida have flipped for Trump and Pennsylvania is in play. Still over 100 days to go so lots can happen of course. Really looking forward to the debates.", '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : I cant even... is there better example of what he is talking about concerning millenials.', ">>{fredjonez} : Trump isn't going to debate, so you will be disappointed.", ">>{lcarlson6082} : Stop. Now. You're entering into a fight that you will always lose.", ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : No, the real bullshit is that we are all going to vote for a running felon because she's the lesser of two evils.", '>>{kmmontandon} : > Millenials are seen as an utter embarrassment by all older generations 1996: "Gen X are seen as an utter embarrassment by all older generations ... etc." 1966: "Baby Boomers are seen as an utter embarrassment by all all older generations ..." Ad naseum.', ">>{sedgwickian} : > pussycat inclinations I think he's talking about internet cat videos...?", ">>{US-American} : Maybe Hillary will put some hair on these millennial's nuts when she ships them off to fight in Aleppo or Estonia. Toughen up these safe space needing pussies!", ">>{Poorjimmy25} : Are we not ever going to get to the point where we take responsibility for our own lives. Nobody forced anyone in the prison system to commit that crime. Nobody is forcing them to work inside , and nobody ever told anyone that the the food would be good. You don't wanna work for pennies to get the food you want. Don't be a criminal. This is all apart of the victimization trend nowadays. Makes me sick!", ">>{ozabelle} : sadly you're confusing the president of the united states, with a high school tough guy.", ">>{Old_Army90} : There haven't been many recent left-wing terror attacks for precedence.", '>>{pm_me_your_cuck_pics} : *commences slapping* Feels so much better than a Trump presidency.', '>>{Roseking} : > felon: a person who has been convicted of a felony. I must have missed the news where they found her guilty of anything.', ">>{Old_Army90} : I don't think that law enforcement released an official motive for it yet, unless they did recently and I missed it.", '>>{nightlily} : If Illegal Immigration was actually about the economy and undocumented workers suppressing American wages, the people who were against it would be even more angry about the problems with prison labor. These are manufacturing jobs that are not going to the hardworking Americans who abide the laws and just want a fair wage.', '>>{mrupvot3s} : Fuck outta here with that. Thugs != liberals. Weak ass troll', ">>{outfishin} : This is not a joke and I'm sick of seeing this here from people pretending to care about Muslims. People were shot during prayer. 6 dead and 19 wounded. They have families who are mourning, not making these asinine jokes. I've talked to the Muslims in my community, they are worried about the copycat killers that show up after an event like this. Many mosques have increased security and are on high alert for people who are acting suspicious. Reach out to Muslims and tell them that you support them and you stand with them. The same happened to Christian churches after a bombing in Egypt in December and many from the Muslim community went out to support them. Don't turn these tragedies into political antagonist comedy when people are still mourning.", ">>{DipsetUniversal} : Oh look, another liberal who can't debate without resorting to ad-hominem attacks, how shocking.", '>>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : Did you literally not read my post. I said "running felon" Do you not know what that is? A running felon?', '>>{salmonchaser} : A felon is a person who has been convicted of a felony. If she has not been convicted of a felony, she is not a felon.', '>>{Antivote} : what else were they gonna do after emancipation? Pay whites enough to work in the fields? Hah. Way cheaper to just have a "crime wave" hit the black part of town round harvest season every year and get them boys to work all legal like.', ">>{Antivote} : at this point i'm pretty sure clarence thomas is a kkk deep cover agent who underwent a full skin transplant to appear black.", ">>{Pariahdog119} : >prisoners don't face extra punishment, they just don't get incentives. There's two kinds of work in prisons: the industrial work that's mostly being referred to here, and the general work that's assigned to all prisoners. You're correct that any prisoner can quit the industrial work, but a prisoner who refuses to work will be punished. 15 days solitary, in my state - and you go right back if you continue to refuse, for example, 15 hour shifts in the kitchen at $18 a month. >other than those in federal institutions--are *not* locked in their cells all the damn time. This isn't dependant on federal / state level, but on security level. Minimum and medium security have open movement, close security has limited movement (must have a pass to go from one place to another, and only at specified times, instead of wandering around at will,) maximum and supermax are locked down. Supermax prisoners never leave their cell. Even the shower is portable - it's rolled up and locked to the doorway, then the cell is opened. Mail is displayed on a video screen.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Fuck that. Ppl shouldnt get free school for crimes', ">>{Grzmot} : I agree. I'm all for rehabilitation, but that is just too much.", '>>{Pariahdog119} : Along with "don\'t be a criminal," here\'s some more advice to avoid prison: Don\'t let a woman dream that you raped her, like Clarence Moses did. Don\'t get sleep deprived and confused and allow police to pressure you into a false confession like Jessie Misskelley, and Gary Gauger, or be friends with those who do like Damien Echols and Jason Baldwin. Don\'t be misidentified by a bystander and have all physical evidence (and confessions from the actual perpetrator) ignored, like Timothy Cole and Darryl Hunt. Don\'t have a murderer claim that you helped them murder, even if you have alibis, like Anthony Graves. Don\'t be black guys around when a white guy gets murdered, like Freddie Pitts and Wilbert Lee. Don\'t be tried by prosecutors who withhold evidence from your attorneys, like James Woodward. Don\'t pick up hitchhikers who later steal your gun and shoot cops with it, like Randal Dale Adams. Don\'t get accused by eyewitnesses who are pressured by police to accuse you, like Juan Johnson. Don\'t vaguely match the description of a "young black male" rapist, like Michael Anthony Green.', '>>{dmb1279} : Dont argue with a idiot. They will pull you down to their level and beat you with experience', '>>{DipsetUniversal} : The Russia thing is merely a convenient diversion your side is trying to use to cover up the fact that Hillary deleted thousands of e-mails. She is corrupt to the core, the only thing your side can do now is blame Trump for everything that befalls her. Quite pathetic. Do you understand that Russia is fighting ISIS as well, do you understanding anything at all? Please explain how Donald Trump supports ISIS.', '>>{the_other_50_percent} : “The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise.” - Socrates', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : Who are you talking about? Who said he was motivated by Trump? What you're saying is fake news. Quite simply you made that up.", ">>{machlangsam} : Stop, please. You're arguing with a self-delusional zealot.", '>>{Omniduro} : Not the best place for a Rick and Morty reference.', '>>{504090} : Where did he say school? Is it the word \'classes\' that caught your eye? The rehabilition process wouldn\'t be a gigantic state-founded public school (and I\'m not sure why you assumed it would). They aren\'t getting "free school" for committing crimes. I urge you to look up the definition of \'rehabilitation\' and how Norway deals with prisoners.', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : No, Trump banned people from unstable regions. I'm not sure why Americans keep getting this wrong. Heck, these are the same counties the Obama administration suggested be temporary restricted.", '>>{dendaddy} : If you educate people they are less likely to turn to crime.', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : That's a lie. You simply made that up. You're a fear monger, pushing fake news to further your political agenda.", ">>{brokenlife18} : Actually that was the media's narrative and false posting from The Donald. We don't release any information about suspects until they have gone to court in Canada. Anything that was posted before the police released info was pure speculation and people making up information to suit their narrative. As well isn't it possible that he could have been screaming it as a way to mock the victims? It's pretty easy for anyone to say the phrase. The Muslim victims were also in prayer so witness could have over heard another person saying it and mistakenly thought it was said by the shooter during the confusion. It's absolutely appalling that the media (particularly the US media) and people decided to run with the narrative that it was Muslim shooter based on no facts other than they had arrested a man from Morocco or that it couldn't possible be a white nationalist so it had to be a Muslim convert when it was shown it was a white man. Then to spread lies of a coverup because info wasn't given right way when in Canada we don't release information on an ongoing investigation until we have all the facts. Quite honestly all those people who jumped to conclusions and shouted it's a Muslim or it's an immigrant or refugee are very much racists and should seriously look at why they jumped to the conclusions they did.", ">>{frowningcat} : I find it so satisfying to downvote a Breitbart article, cause I'm clearly a terrorist loving slave to the liberal mainstream media (e.g. fox news)", ">>{mikoul} : > Who said he was motivated by Trump? Himself the killer, learn to read the news I'm from Quebec by the way.", ">>{Gil_V} : That could be the best comment I've ever read.", ">>{volares} : Point standing it's all right wing extremism branded differently.", ">>{kmmontandon} : > I'd say that the level of dislike (especially the lack of respect shown towards elders) is growing. No, *that's* a lazy argument, made generation after generation.", '>>{treerat} : But not from unstable regions where he does business. We arent getting it wrong. You need to find other sources than Fox News. They sell a false narrative. Zero immigrants from the banned countries have committed acts of terrorism in the US. Unbanned countries include Saudi (9/11) Arabia, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The most recent act of terrorism was in Canada, by a Canadian Trump supporter. The silence on this one is deafening. Why doesnt Trump want to ban Canadians? At least you acknowledge its a ban.', ">>{Smurfboy82} : > Maybe now we'll get some justice out of the ~~justice~~ legal system. FTFY", '>>{Gold_Jacobson} : [Let me ask you: Have you even read the US constitution?](http://i.imgur.com/hNM4x8H.jpg)', ">>{saturninus} : We can go deeper: >Thereafter, would that I were not among the men of the fifth generation, but either had died before or been born afterwards. For now truly is a race of iron, and men never rest from labour and sorrow by day, and from perishing by night; and the gods shall lay sore trouble upon them. But, notwithstanding, even these shall have some good mingled with their evils. And Zeus will destroy this race of mortal men also when they come to have grey hair on the temples at their birth. >The father will not agree with his children, nor the children with their father, nor guest with his host, nor comrade with comrade; nor will brother be dear to brother as aforetime. Men will dishonour their parents as they grow quickly old, and will carp at them, chiding them with bitter words, hard-hearted they, not knowing the fear of the gods. They will not repay their aged parents the cost their nurture, for might shall be their right: and one man will sack another's city. There will be no favour for the man who keeps his oath or for the just or for the good; but rather men will praise the evil-doer and his violent dealing. Strength will be right and reverence will cease to be; and the wicked will hurt the worthy man, speaking false words against him, and will swear an oath upon them. Envy, foul-mouthed, delighting in evil, with scowling face, will go along with wretched men one and all. >And then Aidos and Nemesis, with their sweet forms wrapped in white robes, will go from the wide-pathed earth and forsake mankind to join the company of the deathless gods: and bitter sorrows will be left for mortal men, and there will be no help against evil. >—Hesiod, Works and Days, II. 170-201", ">>{Gold_Jacobson} : Meeeee? Triggered by a tweet!? I'll show you all!", ">>{Smurfboy82} : > They keep cutting the funding and making catch 22 rules like: > You can't seek treatment if you are using. Which shows a willful ignorance of drug addiction by the very same people claiming to work for the benefit of drug addicts.", '>>{iloveamericandsocanu} : What do you think they are going to do once they get out of prison? Or do you just prefer everyone to have life sentences.', ">>{ezreading} : I hate Hillary almost as much as I hate Trump, though not as much as I hate Trump's lapdogs. Try again, lapdog.", ">>{parliboy} : Pretty sure there's nothing free about prison. While I believe that there should be a strongly punitive aspect about prison life, the reality is that is cheaper to educate than to re-incarcerate. Studies have shown that offering inmates free college tuition lowers recidivism so much, that we come out ahead versus not doing so.", ">>{DipsetUniversal} : Let's see, Trump is: Anti TPP. Profoundly less pro-war than Hillary. For medical marijuana. You didn't bring any reasoning for hating Trump, and I at least tried to be nice. Okay, you want to be snarky, I'll see you. Logic didn't seem to apply very well to Bernie supporters, so it was kind of a worthless attempt on my part. I can't wait for another candidate to promise you 'free shit,' and for you to have your heart broken once again by another candidate who losses and sells out. Bernfolks are an easy group to manipulate. All about feelings, no concern on facts.", ">>{parliboy} : True. On the upside, we'd show them a picture of the first family and their minds would explode. But there's still a lot of work to do.", ">>{annoyingstranger} : They shouldn't get out of jail and live normal lives, either, right?", '>>{ivsciguy} : I think the Trump supporters have already taken enough blows to the head....', ">>{9001_Dalmatians} : Well, they should if they want to do something other than commit crimes once they get out. Then again, since no one hires ex-cons, maybe that's too optimistic.", '>>{Meatsim1} : “It was written I should be loyal to the nightmare of my choice.” ~~Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness~~ Trumplekins 2016', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : I've noticed you've said that in multiple posts, making me doubt you're actually in Quebec. I'm in Kingston by the way. I've read the news. Not a single article has that bullshit.", ">>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Except totally different. Judges have already determined that prisoner checks can be garnished for: Cost of detainment, judicial fines, civil damages, and child care. So if the reason they are seeing .40 an hour is because of garnishment and not pay rate there is no problem. It's not like these costs magically disappear when they get out. They'll be on the hook for all this shit when they get out.", '>>{Living_like_a_} : Corporations should not be able to save any amount of labor costs by using prison labor. Prisoners are people too, treating them as anything less is exactly what this article is talking about. It doesn\'t matter what their pay is if it is below minimum wage, anything less is "dressed up slavery in America". Corporations shouldn\'t have any kind of right to increase profits in this kind way. The kickbacks from this practice only incentivize the tough on crime legislation that is ruining people\'s lives in the US.', '>>{midgetman433} : > Prisoners are people too, treating them as anything less is exactly what this article is talking about. right wingers are still adamantly against giving people voting rights AFTER they have served their time. 10% of the state of florida cant vote, and the state wont change it b/c they are afraid the former convicts might vote democrat.', '>>{Cabinet_Space} : The only difference being this guy can actually respond to Trump, while Curiel could not. That makes it all the better.', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : I'm Canadian. I don't have cable television, let along Fox news. That's simply false. I remember a Somali man attacking four people with a machete in Feb 2016 in Ohio. Regardless, isn't that the point? These areas have been identified ad terrorist hot spots due to a lack of stability (often US influenced). Of course it's not a Muslim ban.", ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : Well yes, he and historically all of your governments have favoured select nations. Hence why Communist China has been given a free pass. Let's not pretend Saudi Arabia has been treated equally for the last 60 years, lol. All of your President have favoured S.A. for economic reasons. That's indisputable.", ">>{fyngyrz} : The 13th amendment to the US constitution specifically allows for slavery in the case of criminal conviction. Exact quote, emphasis mine: > 1: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, **except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted**, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. > 2: Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. What needs to happen here \\(presuming one is against using the convicted in the role of slave labor\\) is, first, pressure directed towards your congressperson\\(s\\), who can make laws against this, as it is simply allowed, not required; Second, gather support for a constitutional convention in order to reword the 13th amendment to: > 1: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. > 2: Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. The current problem, IMHO, is that the general attitude in the US WRT prison is that its purpose is retribution rather than rehabilitation. The majority does not care what happens to people convicted of crimes, either in prison or afterwards; or they actively support the status quo. Here in the US, we have had horrific conditions in prisons for many years, as well as high levels of continuing ostracism and punishment post-imprisonment. There are some small organizations here and there who agitate against all this, but they have never built up much of a footprint. Personally, I think the current situation is both wrong and self-destructive in that society at large doesn't benefit from it, and in fact, suffers from it. People who are abused tend to build up major resentment. People who can't get jobs tend to build up major resentment. People who can't support, or even establish, a family tend to build up major resentment. It all strikes me as a way to create repeating, angry criminal behavior.", ">>{Seanay-B} : I see no problem with using work as a legal punishment for crimes. Shit, if nothing else, incarceration isn't free.", ">>{ezreading} : Stop. If I roll my eyes any harder I'm liable to shatter all my windows with a sonic boom.", '>>{keeponlooking} : Life pro tip...get the fuck out of the South.', '>>{NorthChan} : Which side, the left or the right, do you find more nationalistic? Keeping in mind that the basic difference between left and right is that conservatives believe in states rights and small government, and liberals believe in federal rights and big government. You know, basic concepts that are taught in any government or politics course in every college in the world. In your own thoughts and deep knowledge of government please tell me what the difference is to you, and which one is more nationalistic.', ">>{Elbowsmell} : > It all strikes me as a way to create repeating, angry criminal behavior This is not an accident at all. Cops know whats going to happen to that man and, inevitably, his family when they put him in a cage with violent offenders. He's going to be exponentially more likely to commit a violent crime and his kids will be forced onto a path with a destination not too different. Cops know this. It's burned into their brains in training. How else would they get paid if they didn't have a steady stream of revenue, safety of the public be damned? What we need to do to survive as a society is hold them accountable. We need representatives that are willing to pass legislation that will force these thugs to prove to 12 of their own peers that their wanton discarding of human decency in search of profits was not maliciously motivated. And if they can't they should be rehabilitated because it seems to me like their behavior is incompatible with western society. Or we can just keep teaching nonviolent criminals (read: black and poor people) how to most effectively commit violent crimes. It's actually kinda funny how stupid Americans are about this topic. I read a story about an Egyptian activist who was imprisoned for speaking out against his country's leadership. He said there were thousands of people in the prison in the same situation as him- they were innocent of any real crime. Well guess what- it turns out that when you're falsely imprisoned in a prison with a bunch of ISIS members, that it's not too difficult for said ISIS members to indoctrinate you. I mean those people on the outside of the prison that these ISIS members are saying are horrible; they just threw you in a cage for nothing. It doesn't take a psychologist to trace that line of reasoning. (edit for clarification:) The point of this story was to show how effectively the imprisonment of nonviolent people endangers us all. Cops are literally, and purposefully, making you (YES YOU!) less safe. Fucking vote about it.", ">>{treerat} : >[Law enforcement officials told NBC News that Artan was a Somali refugee who left his homeland with his family in 2007, **lived in Pakistan** and then came to the United States in 2014 as a legal permanent resident.](http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/suspect-dead-after-ohio-state-university-car-knife-attack-n689076) Pakistan is not on the Muslim ban list. Sounds like that's where he might have been radicalized. Of course its a Muslim ban. They even admitted it.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : Our justice system is a giant racket. One article I read pointed out that the actual level of crime reduction created by mass incarceration is about as low as 2% of the overall crime rate. Okay, so maybe it isn\'t *totally* useless. It made things an optimistic 2% better. I mean it had to ruin millions of lives and entire communities in order to get that 2%, but hey who cares about poor people right? Important thing is rich white people *feel* safe and *feel* like "justice" (whatever that is) is being served (so long as it\'s not to them, get me?) I tell people I\'m in favor of abolishing prisons and they look at me like I\'m insane. Basic reality is that there is very, very, few people in this society that are a threat to literally everybody around them. Most people in our prisons are there for drug related shit or petty offenses that are not going to be made better via chucking them into a cage for 20 years and forcing them to work for a corporation. You really care about crime in this country? Pour money into education, into decent housing, give people opportunities to build a better life for themselves. Focus less on punishment and more on rehabilitation. Invest in mental health care. Help communities deal with their own problems instead of imposing the will of the state on them. But there\'s no money in that shit, you see. So a giant, Kafkaesque bureaucracy, profiteering, and the widespread devastation of human life is what we get instead', '>>{r00tdenied} : Except the polls plus model has Hillary at 60% and that is the prediction for Nov 8th. That number will only increase as Drumpf continues expelling excrement from his face.', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : Huh? The point was he was a Somali. Again, it's a 120 day order. No one has the right to come to America, it's a privilege. It's not a Muslim ban by definition, but essentially yes, of course it is. I applaud their courage. Islam and the West are not compatible.", ">>{odoroustobacco} : Many prisoners don't even have high school diplomas. That shit's free regardless.", '>>{treerat} : > Islam and the West are not compatible. You and the First Amendment are not compatible. >Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Now go be a good little boy and read up on the [Establishment clause](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Establishment_Clause). And next time, pay more attention in civics class. We are not yet a theocracy, no matter how hard the Reich wing is trying.', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : You're right. I'm Canadian, the first ammendment doesn't apply. Good thing the constitution doesn't say anything about restricting immigration from specific regions.", '>>{odoroustobacco} : Watched that documentary my first semester of grad school. Real eye-opener. **This is why policy is important.**', ">>{oldoneeyed} : Americans are for some reason under the delusion that the police and the courts exist to protect them. They don't. They exist to protect the status quo in our society. Whether that overlaps with your own personal problems or not is irrelevant. The police are not your friends, judges are not your friends, politicians are not your friends. They don't give a shit about you and never will. There has never, ever, *ever* been a point in human history when the courts and prisons worked for the benefit of regular people. All of this shit exists as a means of control. That's its only reason for existence: to ensure that powerful people are not threatened by the rest of the country and to make sure that we go along with them.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : Sounds like you are hoping for another terrorist attack to distract from Trump's stupidity.", '>>{FakeAccount84} : It\'s not "dressed up." It\'s literal slavery, as allowed by the thirteenth amendment. >Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, **except as a punishment for crime**', '>>{yeauxlo} : Food shelter and education is free. At least they need to do some labor to earn it', '>>{yeauxlo} : Sure they can. There are all kinds of jobs society needs done that dont require education', '>>{yeauxlo} : Proof? If you dont give them a get out of work card with free health insurance and education they wont commit crimes maybe', ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : Why the fuck would he want too hit back? There are countless ways to address it that wouldn't make him look like a fucking psycho, he's just to stupid to do it.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Uh why not just give them labor so they make up for their crime with labor instead of rewarding them with free education funded by law abiding citizens for law abiding citizens', ">>{odoroustobacco} : So that they don't reoffend due to lack of opportunity when they're released. Do you think if a person goes to jail once they're done as a person for the rest of their lives?", '>>{Mongopwn} : Stands up against what? The man is running to he president. The fact that he so quickly and completely loses his temper against every perceived slight, no matter how small, shows that he is just too whiney and thin skinned to be president. He didn\'t have to respond at all. The response he has given shows that no, he can\'t stand up for himself. He\'s throwing a childish temper tantrum. If Trump is so easily triggered by some random dude, how the hell could he ever hope to stand up to his political opponents? I dot get how you see this as being "tough."', '>>{jschuch82} : Billions of dollars are spent in our prisons to "rehabilitate", but as most of the public are apathetic to the plight of prisoners most of this is a total waste. Gaurds and civilian teachers and the like are a joke. The largest percentage of our prisoners are substance abusers who could be treated far cheaper than the cost of incarceration. The drug war needs to be ended first and most importantly the way our prisoners are treated has to change.', ">>{dendaddy} : It will take you just as long as it would me to Google it and see it's true.", '>>{Maddoktor2} : You appear to be confusing facts with excuses. Sad!', ">>{Maddoktor2} : Found the Bernie Lover! Trump just loves those willfully ignorant Useful Idiots. Best support he's had all year! =D", '>>{iloveamericandsocanu} : So basically just imprison them for life if you know they are going to commit crime anyway. Steal something, go to jail for the rest of your life. Get caught using drugs, prison for the rest of your life. Why not just cut out the middle man and become more like the Philippines', '>>{TheChinchilla914} : *Will vote democrat Not discussing the morality of it, just letting you know the practical effect', ">>{JonnyVegas22} : Wow the police have a lot of control over you. They can take you from a lowly non-violent offender and completely mold you into a violent killer. Noted. Guess I just won't get arrested for breaking the law, thank you kind stranger.", '>>{fat_osvaldo} : > its purpose is retribution rather than rehabilitation. The majority does not care what happens to people convicted of crimes, either in prison or afterwards; or they actively support the status quo You hit the nail on the head right there. I firmly believe we should make an effort to assist former felons with obtaining jobs.', ">>{PlasticPilot11} : Non-violent offenders can earn work release in a prison nearby me. They get paid by local businesses to do work in manufacturing plants and such. It's a great program, the prisoners earn money to pay back restitution to the state and to save for themselves/families. In this program, its optional. Not slavery.", ">>{SamusBaratheon} : Or just arrested. You don't need to have done anything to be arrested", ">>{JonnyVegas22} : Still the control is amazing, I'll be mindful of it. I thought I had more choice in the type of person I am. Edit: word", '>>{midgetman433} : how do you know though? is it based on demographics? b/c 40% the population is non hispanic white, and 20% is hispanic and 40% african american. even if they all voted 100% for democrats, it still wouldnt be moral to deny them the right to vote. this type of disenfranchisement reminds me of the things southern democrats would do to prevent freed slaves from voting for republicans.', ">>{504090} : It costs much more money for criminals to continue getting arrested and serve sentences than to help them transition into society through a program. I don't think you know how fucked convicts and ex-convicts are, in and out of jail. In jail, they're enslaved and worked for hours. Out of jail, it's extremely difficult for them to find jobs and become a functioning member of society. Again, rehabilitation isn't free education, and we aren't rewarding them by helping them get out of a rigged system. I envision it being more than just a class. Ideally, it should be a program that can help them find jobs and a new outlook on lifestyle.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Half of the nation is voting a president who might do just that. If they get their way thats the democratic way', '>>{RomanNumeralVI} : > You really care about crime in this country? Pour money into education, into decent housing, give people opportunities to build a better life for themselves. [We have been doing this since about 1966](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/national/great-society-at-50/), 50 years ago. Crime is way up since we began to do what you suggest. [Chicago experienced a major rise in violent crime starting in the late 1960s, a decline in overall crime in the 2000s, and then a rebound in overall murders the mid-2010s](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Chicago) The Baltimore schools get more money than any other district but one. Maryland is the richest state and the bluest state as well. Has this reduced crime in Baltimore?', ">>{Elbowsmell} : I don't get what your argument is here. Are you mistaking my analysis of our prisons as being a breeding ground for violence with some sort of super natural power that cops have to transform people? You know that's not what I said at all, right? I get it, you're in control of your choices and that's great. But if you were in a jail or prison you wouldn't be and, by the time you got out, you would be a different person. More than likely, you'd be a more violent person. Now, under the very obviously true condition that all prisons are breeding grounds for violence and violent behavior, wouldn't you agree that sending nonviolent people there is in no one's best interest?", '>>{RomanNumeralVI} : Nope. Those slaves would upon arrival laugh at the suggestion that criminals should not work while in prison. The 13th Amendment makes slavery while *in prison* legal. Slavery has made a huge comeback in the last decade globally. [The old African slave markets have reopened](http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/who-will-buy-boko-haram-s-200-kidnapped-girls-modern-slave-markets-west-africa-1447734). If you want to know what slavery *really is* you should visit a modern slave market. [ISIS will sell you a sex slave for $170](http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/11/05/isis-sex-slave-markets-are-a-modern-repeat-of-barbary-pirate-slavery-trade/). Our Middle East policy has had the downside of reopening the slave markets closed so long ago.', ">>{odoroustobacco} : So then what are they supposed to do with their time? Idle hands, you know? You don't strike me as someone who does a lot of critical thinking though.", '>>{yeauxlo} : How about prison labor? Funny criticism about critical thinking when the alternative to providing free education incentive for crime is listed right in the submission title.', ">>{yeauxlo} : If they are sincerely apologetic and sincere about reformation, they won't commit more crime. If they're naturally inclined to crime...they must do the time?", ">>{yeauxlo} : If they're naturally inclined to crime let them rot in prison. If they care about reformation, they will reform. We need it to be a deterrent not a fucking place to go for free shelter, insurance, and a degree while doing nothing for society.", ">>{odoroustobacco} : Yeah except the labor they provide doesn't teach them any meaningful skills and is used by the companies to lower costs and increase profits--aka exploit. Fuck prison labor, and fuck anyone that doesn't want prisoners to learn skills that will keep them out of the system.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Most criminals tried to lower cost, increase their profits, and exploit honest people. They need to pay it back', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Overall crime rates are at their lowest levels in decades. The few pockets that buck that trend are ironically a product of the drug war and mass incarceration.', '>>{JonnyVegas22} : Well you likened putting Egyptian activists into jail and popping out members of ISIS so maybe calm down the rhetoric so I can tell if you\'re engaging in a real conversation or just adding to the sensationalism around criminal justice reform. If you think that your average 40 hour a week cop thinks beyond doing his job safely and getting home at the end of the day, so much so that he is actively thinking about this like it was "burned into his mind in training" you\'re way overthinking this. You may have anecdotal evidence to the contrary, but that, an argument does not make. And lastly you\'re placing all of the blame of violent offenders on police and completely taking away the fact that some people are just going to turn out that way regardless of arrest or jailing. You\'re not going to get rid of jailing people for non-violent offenses, it is necessary in some cases, but you sure as hell can assign some responsibility to people outside of a uniform.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Because the war on drugs creates violence and mass incarceration destabilizes entire communities. I just went over that. Add to that the economic impact of the recession (which never really ended for poor people) and...well, bam. Pretty much all of the violence in Chicago is drug related. Ask yourself why that is.', ">>{TheChinchilla914} : I'd put all money on the fact that 75%+ of convicted felons in FL would vote Democrat"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{packawolves} : He is Void of Decency, He Has a Dark Heart.', '>>{onboardthetrumptrain} : I wonder how Mr Khan feels about ISIS and what he intend to do about them? I mean since he has such strong thoughts about American politics and Donald Trump. edit: Getting downvoted like an SoB. Triggered? LOL', ">>{ozabelle} : this is previously unknown guy is giving donald the great a serious beat down. i mean this guy is kicking donald's ass up and down the street, day after day, and donald keeps coming back for a rematch.", '>>{ShroudedSciuridae} : He probably hates the people perverting his religion in ways you could never comprehend.', ">>{CarmineFields} : Because, no matter how bad Trump is losing, he thinks he's winning because he's been told how brilliant his every thought is from birth.", ">>{DumpsterDon} : My guess is that he thinks they're bad, like 99.99% of Americans. His position on Trump reflects back to Trumps call for a Muslim ban and it's ridiculous unconstitutionality. As to what do, I'd say that his son dying in uniform is enough to say.", '>>{space_dan} : You mean a group similar to the people that murdered his son, who gave his life for this country? Probably not a fan.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Woah, the incessant unending #BooTrump beatdown by the media is having a significant impact on Trump's poll numbers... they keep- #GOING UP!! Maybe they should start bashing Hillary... who knows, it might work.", ">>{fredjonez} : They're falling sharply the last two days, as expected.", '>>{Gscarveguy} : Yeah? Your guy is crazier than a shithouse bug. Real intelligent choice!', ">>{nirad} : after the conventions, Judge Gonazalo Curiel was fading from view. This is like the same thing all over again - a reminder of Trump's basic lack of decency.", ">>{MAGA24} : It's hard to hit back at someone who cowers behind their dead son.", '>>{ezreading} : Speak of decency, and a void doth appear.', '>>{Citizen00001} : All the talk about Trump playing 5D chess. Looking at the DNC, you know they chose the programming in a way to trigger Trump. They knew he was going to cross the line in response to some. And he fell right into their trap.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I doubt he likes terrorists seeing that his son is literally dead.', ">>{Piglet86} : You mean someone that shouldn't be hit back at all right? Banning all muslims was a fucking *retarded* idea. This family shows why. Love how you basically gave a non answer. You can't even defend trump on this one. After all the trump supporters spin on literally every dumbass shit trump said you guys dont have answer to this one. Hahahahahah", ">>{ozabelle} : dumbass donald should never have been in a fight with this fellow in the first place, and certainly not personally. he is handling it terribly. he's all tangled up exactly when a president would need the statesmanship to rise above. it's a very bad showing and it just keeps going.", '>>{MAVERICK910} : Khan is scheduled for two Sunday morning TV interviews. This is just starting.', '>>{MAGA24} : Trump is allowed to defend himself from a man being propped up –solely for political purposes– by Hillary Clinton. I agree that banning muslims is a shortsighted and stupid idea, but the controversy behind that ban and Kahn will fade away when there is another islamic terrorist attack.', '>>{MAGA24} : Trump can defend himself. Kahn is a disgrace and his son would be disappointed in his father.', ">>{fredjonez} : Right, it hasn't been updated with the last three national and state polls. I think two were today and one late yesterday. We'll get a bunch more tomorrow and Monday. The other two besides the one you singled out have Clinton in the lead.", ">>{moleratical} : What's it like to be completely separated from reality?", ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Hillary almost gave the game away in her speech, luckily Trump isn't too bright.", ">>{MaxMalini} : ^Speaking on behalf of a dead person he's never met.", '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Updated eight hours ago. But keep the faith.', ">>{ezreading} : You guys sure do love to hope for more mass murders in the name of Islam. You're the 5th Trump-tart I've seen do it the last 2 days. Your boss wants Russia to hack us. You and your tart compatriots want ISIS to kill us. At which point do we start treating you all like the traitors you are?", ">>{fredjonez} : What excuses? I said Trump was doing terrible in the last three national and state polls, those aren't excuses, facts. The post convention bump is real. On Monday all three will be Clinton, probably even after the next update.", ">>{fredjonez} : That's what I said, two were released today and one late yesterday. Did you not read that? We'll get some more tomorrow, and a bunch Monday for all the post convention goodness. Also, you singled out the one out of three that has Trump winning.", ">>{MAGA24} : I'm not hoping for anything. I'm pointing out the realities of the world in which we live.", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : It's wonderful! Goldman Sachs and foreign governments pay me hundreds of thousands of dollars to give speeches that I keep secret to hide my hypocrisy while harping at Trump about his tax returns. You should try it!!", ">>{ozabelle} : are you kidding? donald looks really bad here and there's no good reason for him to fight this man, there is nothing to gain. donald should have at most honored fallen americans generally, acknowledged american families who have lost love ones, reiterated his support for the military and veterans, and let it go at that. arguing with this guy, especially on his own terms, is politically stupid and costing him. he should have known that before hand. goading this man's wife was just stupid.", ">>{ezreading} : Trump-tarts don't live on the same planet as actual people. You live on Planet Trump.", ">>{MAGA24} : You really let things get to you, don't you? I'd like a president that stands up for himself.", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : No, I just went to Silver's default. The #NOW graph has Hillary edging Trump slightly but the trend lines on the individual state are not looking good for Hillary. Nevada and Florida have flipped for Trump and Pennsylvania is in play. Still over 100 days to go so lots can happen of course. Really looking forward to the debates.", ">>{fredjonez} : Trump isn't going to debate, so you will be disappointed.", ">>{lcarlson6082} : Stop. Now. You're entering into a fight that you will always lose.", ">>{ozabelle} : sadly you're confusing the president of the united states, with a high school tough guy.", ">>{DipsetUniversal} : Oh look, another liberal who can't debate without resorting to ad-hominem attacks, how shocking.", '>>{dmb1279} : Dont argue with a idiot. They will pull you down to their level and beat you with experience', '>>{DipsetUniversal} : The Russia thing is merely a convenient diversion your side is trying to use to cover up the fact that Hillary deleted thousands of e-mails. She is corrupt to the core, the only thing your side can do now is blame Trump for everything that befalls her. Quite pathetic. Do you understand that Russia is fighting ISIS as well, do you understanding anything at all? Please explain how Donald Trump supports ISIS.', ">>{machlangsam} : Stop, please. You're arguing with a self-delusional zealot.", '>>{Gold_Jacobson} : [Let me ask you: Have you even read the US constitution?](http://i.imgur.com/hNM4x8H.jpg)', ">>{Gold_Jacobson} : Meeeee? Triggered by a tweet!? I'll show you all!", ">>{ezreading} : I hate Hillary almost as much as I hate Trump, though not as much as I hate Trump's lapdogs. Try again, lapdog.", ">>{DipsetUniversal} : Let's see, Trump is: Anti TPP. Profoundly less pro-war than Hillary. For medical marijuana. You didn't bring any reasoning for hating Trump, and I at least tried to be nice. Okay, you want to be snarky, I'll see you. Logic didn't seem to apply very well to Bernie supporters, so it was kind of a worthless attempt on my part. I can't wait for another candidate to promise you 'free shit,' and for you to have your heart broken once again by another candidate who losses and sells out. Bernfolks are an easy group to manipulate. All about feelings, no concern on facts.", '>>{Meatsim1} : “It was written I should be loyal to the nightmare of my choice.” ~~Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness~~ Trumplekins 2016', '>>{Cabinet_Space} : The only difference being this guy can actually respond to Trump, while Curiel could not. That makes it all the better.', ">>{ezreading} : Stop. If I roll my eyes any harder I'm liable to shatter all my windows with a sonic boom.", '>>{r00tdenied} : Except the polls plus model has Hillary at 60% and that is the prediction for Nov 8th. That number will only increase as Drumpf continues expelling excrement from his face.', ">>{hazenthephysicist} : Sounds like you are hoping for another terrorist attack to distract from Trump's stupidity.", ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : Why the fuck would he want too hit back? There are countless ways to address it that wouldn't make him look like a fucking psycho, he's just to stupid to do it.", '>>{Mongopwn} : Stands up against what? The man is running to he president. The fact that he so quickly and completely loses his temper against every perceived slight, no matter how small, shows that he is just too whiney and thin skinned to be president. He didn\'t have to respond at all. The response he has given shows that no, he can\'t stand up for himself. He\'s throwing a childish temper tantrum. If Trump is so easily triggered by some random dude, how the hell could he ever hope to stand up to his political opponents? I dot get how you see this as being "tough."', '>>{Maddoktor2} : You appear to be confusing facts with excuses. Sad!', ">>{Maddoktor2} : Found the Bernie Lover! Trump just loves those willfully ignorant Useful Idiots. Best support he's had all year! =D"], ['>>{DoremusJessup} : ‘It’s Just Dressed Up Slavery’: America’s Shadow Workforce Rises Up Against Prison Labor', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : It is the modern plantation system where the taxpayer foots the housing and feeding bill of the slaves.', '>>{ozabelle} : never should have allowed that loophole. so many have suffered from it, and the forces of evil have prospered thereby.', ">>{brownribbon} : Right off the bat they admit it's voluntary. Not sure the authors understand the concept of slavery.", '>>{sircool099} : >"“It was more of a volunteer thing than it was forced labor, but it was tantamount to the same thing,”" Second paragraph. I don\'t think you know what slavery means.', '>>{marvinwork} : With trump law and order policies you are guarantee a steady stream of slaves.', '>>{ozabelle} : ok, so a prisoner "volunteers" to work for free instead of being locked in a cell. we could say slaves volunteered to work instead of their other choice, eg, being locked in stocks, or maybe bullwhipped.', ">>{Backflip_Wilson} : maybe you should look up the word 'tantamount'...", '>>{turtledan87} : talk to the Constitution: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."', '>>{TheManWithTheBigName} : For those people doing time in federal prisons, the work isn’t optional. The Crime Control Act of 1990 established that all federal prisoners who are physically capable of work must have a job while serving their sentences.', '>>{Urbanviking1} : tantamount |ˈtantəˌmount| adjective [ predic. ] (tantamount to) equivalent in seriousness to; virtually the same as', '>>{ozabelle} : and the honorable clarence thomas argued that prisoners who refuse to work can be legally beaten.', ">>{sircool099} : I know it's meaning. Slavery is the opposite of volunteer....", ">>{brownribbon} : No we can't because slaves were (a) kidnapped or born into their lot and (b) prisoners don't face extra punishment, they just don't get incentives. Also, prisoners are paid (and don't get me wrong, the abysmal wage is itself a crime), and--other than those in federal institutions--are *not* locked in their cells all the damn time.", '>>{Backflip_Wilson} : what is the opposite of "forced labor"? Did you read the sentence you quoted?', '>>{ozabelle} : well then again, pro slavery apologists (the ron pauls and ted cruzs of their day) did blame slaves for their enslavement, and reckon they were actually doing them a favor, and they were being paid, kindly in means necessary and understandable (food, shelter, clothing). plus they got time off and opportunity to socialize. slaves who worked well and cooperated with authorities were also rewarded and enjoyed advancement, even managerial positions. suffice it to say, for volunteering to be meaningful in more than a cynical if not an orwellian way, requires freedom. prisoners and slaves aren\'t free, and can\'t "volunteer". both are at the mercy of their masters.', ">>{toomanyofus} : you would think we could do a better job wth prisons by now. working for 12 cents an hour doesn't help anybody", ">>{JitGoinHam} : >'It's just dressed up slavery' Ooh-la-la... someone's gonna get laid in college.", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : It's a model that goes way back. This is an [outstanding documentary](http://www.pbs.org/tpt/slavery-by-another-name/watch/) about the systematic enslavement of blacks after the civil war. Not trying to make this a black thing. It's happening to anyone who goes to prison these days. Maybe now we'll get some justice out of the justice system.", ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : While I agree with you, it's not a loophole. It's a feature, not a bug.", '>>{KingoftheFools} : we need to stop worrying about these slaves, these laborers. We stand on tired shoulders and we must take our eyes off our feet. put your eyes on your head, look to the sky, where the buildings dominate the horizon i want you to take your damn feet and walk their with your damn feet wlk in the damn elevator and talk to the president of slave labour wager payer talk to him give him your two sense tell him ow to run it, how to drive it, really drive it in show em tell him. i want you to be an instructor, teacher, mentor', '>>{ozabelle} : well yeah still, shouldna let the south build it in.', '>>{hobbes305} : The original US Constitution fully allowed for the state sponsored institution of multigenerational chattel slavery. Just because the current version of the Constitution allows for slavery and/or involuntary servitude within a prison context, that in no way means that such a construct will not be reviled and rejected in the future.', '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : Thank, yes I agree but the conservatives have made it a black thing. they made it clear from the beginning from Nixons, I will lock them all up to the DEA, and the Iran/Contra/Drugs to U.S.Cities followed by all those "tough on crime laws." Mandatory sentencing,+5times for crack, enhanced sentencing, thousands of new crimes to add to each arrest. It is almost to the point that if you turned yourself in you would be charged with resisting arrest because you didn\'t come in sooner.', ">>{fuckoffplsthankyou} : That's exactly what it is. Such was the intent of the 13th Amendment. That's why there is an exception to slavery written into the Constitution. This country was built on slavery and has never stopped.", '>>{thinkB4WeSpeak} : What they should do is ban prisons from producing anything. Fill the prisoners time with rehabilitation and classes.', ">>{fuckoffplsthankyou} : > Not trying to make this a black thing. It's happening to anyone who goes to prison these days. And that's the reason why blacks get 15% more jail time for the exact same crime as whites. That's why we have minimum sentencing laws. It's the reason blacks and whites commit drug crimes at the same rates but more blacks are arrested while whites are cited. It's racism pure and simple. It does effect everyone who is in jail/prison but there's a reason there's more minorities in prison/jail than whites and it's not because white people are somehow angels.", '>>{unknowndatabase} : As a white person, I second this message.', '>>{Plisskens_snake} : I don\'t disagree at all. I didn\'t want to be accused of playing the so called "race card" by people who have no appreciation for the part skin color or endemic poverty play in our justice system. It\'s a good documentary. Give it a look.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : The one saving grace of the early drug war was that people at least had access to decent treatment programs either through public funding or their own insurance. These days I'm not even sure insurance covers drug treatment. When I needed outpatient treatment back in the eighties my insurance picked up the tab and I was grateful.", ">>{JumpingJazzJam} : They keep cutting the funding and making catch 22 rules like: You can't seek treatment if you are using. I am glad you were able to get care.", '>>{x86_64Ubuntu} : That\'s the same thing they told blacks in the antebellum period. "If you don\'t like the law, change it". Meanwhile, we\'d have conservatives pursuing voter suppression laws to keep blacks from changing the law.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : PM me with any feedback you have. I'd be interested.", '>>{RomanNumeralVI} : Slavery. Not a problem before Obama/Clinton took over. Prisoners are legally slaves. They must work.', ">>{Gunzen} : I think somebody needs to remind all you peeps out there talking a about Slavery building this country, or it being commonplace that at it's height of popularity there were only 1.5% of the white population that even owned a slave. You guys act like there were slaves everywhere. Most people never even saw or used one. That does not make it right, but the idea of slavery being the norm or building anything substantial is ludicrous. And even that number would not be as high except that 28% of the black population owned slaves. Slavery still exists and there are millions of them that are owned by Arabs/Muslims around the world right now. The US slave trade was a tiny speck of sand on the beach of slavery on this planet. Read a damn history book you people.", ">>{dread_beard} : Doesn't even have to be normal. Say, $5.00 an hour. That's 10 times their current wage and could at least see savings being made.", ">>{Poorjimmy25} : Are we not ever going to get to the point where we take responsibility for our own lives. Nobody forced anyone in the prison system to commit that crime. Nobody is forcing them to work inside , and nobody ever told anyone that the the food would be good. You don't wanna work for pennies to get the food you want. Don't be a criminal. This is all apart of the victimization trend nowadays. Makes me sick!", '>>{nightlily} : If Illegal Immigration was actually about the economy and undocumented workers suppressing American wages, the people who were against it would be even more angry about the problems with prison labor. These are manufacturing jobs that are not going to the hardworking Americans who abide the laws and just want a fair wage.', '>>{Antivote} : what else were they gonna do after emancipation? Pay whites enough to work in the fields? Hah. Way cheaper to just have a "crime wave" hit the black part of town round harvest season every year and get them boys to work all legal like.', ">>{Antivote} : at this point i'm pretty sure clarence thomas is a kkk deep cover agent who underwent a full skin transplant to appear black.", ">>{Pariahdog119} : >prisoners don't face extra punishment, they just don't get incentives. There's two kinds of work in prisons: the industrial work that's mostly being referred to here, and the general work that's assigned to all prisoners. You're correct that any prisoner can quit the industrial work, but a prisoner who refuses to work will be punished. 15 days solitary, in my state - and you go right back if you continue to refuse, for example, 15 hour shifts in the kitchen at $18 a month. >other than those in federal institutions--are *not* locked in their cells all the damn time. This isn't dependant on federal / state level, but on security level. Minimum and medium security have open movement, close security has limited movement (must have a pass to go from one place to another, and only at specified times, instead of wandering around at will,) maximum and supermax are locked down. Supermax prisoners never leave their cell. Even the shower is portable - it's rolled up and locked to the doorway, then the cell is opened. Mail is displayed on a video screen.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Fuck that. Ppl shouldnt get free school for crimes', ">>{Grzmot} : I agree. I'm all for rehabilitation, but that is just too much.", '>>{Pariahdog119} : Along with "don\'t be a criminal," here\'s some more advice to avoid prison: Don\'t let a woman dream that you raped her, like Clarence Moses did. Don\'t get sleep deprived and confused and allow police to pressure you into a false confession like Jessie Misskelley, and Gary Gauger, or be friends with those who do like Damien Echols and Jason Baldwin. Don\'t be misidentified by a bystander and have all physical evidence (and confessions from the actual perpetrator) ignored, like Timothy Cole and Darryl Hunt. Don\'t have a murderer claim that you helped them murder, even if you have alibis, like Anthony Graves. Don\'t be black guys around when a white guy gets murdered, like Freddie Pitts and Wilbert Lee. Don\'t be tried by prosecutors who withhold evidence from your attorneys, like James Woodward. Don\'t pick up hitchhikers who later steal your gun and shoot cops with it, like Randal Dale Adams. Don\'t get accused by eyewitnesses who are pressured by police to accuse you, like Juan Johnson. Don\'t vaguely match the description of a "young black male" rapist, like Michael Anthony Green.', '>>{Omniduro} : Not the best place for a Rick and Morty reference.', '>>{504090} : Where did he say school? Is it the word \'classes\' that caught your eye? The rehabilition process wouldn\'t be a gigantic state-founded public school (and I\'m not sure why you assumed it would). They aren\'t getting "free school" for committing crimes. I urge you to look up the definition of \'rehabilitation\' and how Norway deals with prisoners.', '>>{dendaddy} : If you educate people they are less likely to turn to crime.', ">>{Gil_V} : That could be the best comment I've ever read.", ">>{Smurfboy82} : > Maybe now we'll get some justice out of the ~~justice~~ legal system. FTFY", ">>{Smurfboy82} : > They keep cutting the funding and making catch 22 rules like: > You can't seek treatment if you are using. Which shows a willful ignorance of drug addiction by the very same people claiming to work for the benefit of drug addicts.", '>>{iloveamericandsocanu} : What do you think they are going to do once they get out of prison? Or do you just prefer everyone to have life sentences.', ">>{parliboy} : Pretty sure there's nothing free about prison. While I believe that there should be a strongly punitive aspect about prison life, the reality is that is cheaper to educate than to re-incarcerate. Studies have shown that offering inmates free college tuition lowers recidivism so much, that we come out ahead versus not doing so.", ">>{parliboy} : True. On the upside, we'd show them a picture of the first family and their minds would explode. But there's still a lot of work to do.", ">>{annoyingstranger} : They shouldn't get out of jail and live normal lives, either, right?", ">>{9001_Dalmatians} : Well, they should if they want to do something other than commit crimes once they get out. Then again, since no one hires ex-cons, maybe that's too optimistic.", ">>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Except totally different. Judges have already determined that prisoner checks can be garnished for: Cost of detainment, judicial fines, civil damages, and child care. So if the reason they are seeing .40 an hour is because of garnishment and not pay rate there is no problem. It's not like these costs magically disappear when they get out. They'll be on the hook for all this shit when they get out.", '>>{Living_like_a_} : Corporations should not be able to save any amount of labor costs by using prison labor. Prisoners are people too, treating them as anything less is exactly what this article is talking about. It doesn\'t matter what their pay is if it is below minimum wage, anything less is "dressed up slavery in America". Corporations shouldn\'t have any kind of right to increase profits in this kind way. The kickbacks from this practice only incentivize the tough on crime legislation that is ruining people\'s lives in the US.', '>>{midgetman433} : > Prisoners are people too, treating them as anything less is exactly what this article is talking about. right wingers are still adamantly against giving people voting rights AFTER they have served their time. 10% of the state of florida cant vote, and the state wont change it b/c they are afraid the former convicts might vote democrat.', ">>{fyngyrz} : The 13th amendment to the US constitution specifically allows for slavery in the case of criminal conviction. Exact quote, emphasis mine: > 1: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, **except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted**, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. > 2: Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. What needs to happen here \\(presuming one is against using the convicted in the role of slave labor\\) is, first, pressure directed towards your congressperson\\(s\\), who can make laws against this, as it is simply allowed, not required; Second, gather support for a constitutional convention in order to reword the 13th amendment to: > 1: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. > 2: Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. The current problem, IMHO, is that the general attitude in the US WRT prison is that its purpose is retribution rather than rehabilitation. The majority does not care what happens to people convicted of crimes, either in prison or afterwards; or they actively support the status quo. Here in the US, we have had horrific conditions in prisons for many years, as well as high levels of continuing ostracism and punishment post-imprisonment. There are some small organizations here and there who agitate against all this, but they have never built up much of a footprint. Personally, I think the current situation is both wrong and self-destructive in that society at large doesn't benefit from it, and in fact, suffers from it. People who are abused tend to build up major resentment. People who can't get jobs tend to build up major resentment. People who can't support, or even establish, a family tend to build up major resentment. It all strikes me as a way to create repeating, angry criminal behavior.", ">>{Seanay-B} : I see no problem with using work as a legal punishment for crimes. Shit, if nothing else, incarceration isn't free.", '>>{keeponlooking} : Life pro tip...get the fuck out of the South.', ">>{Elbowsmell} : > It all strikes me as a way to create repeating, angry criminal behavior This is not an accident at all. Cops know whats going to happen to that man and, inevitably, his family when they put him in a cage with violent offenders. He's going to be exponentially more likely to commit a violent crime and his kids will be forced onto a path with a destination not too different. Cops know this. It's burned into their brains in training. How else would they get paid if they didn't have a steady stream of revenue, safety of the public be damned? What we need to do to survive as a society is hold them accountable. We need representatives that are willing to pass legislation that will force these thugs to prove to 12 of their own peers that their wanton discarding of human decency in search of profits was not maliciously motivated. And if they can't they should be rehabilitated because it seems to me like their behavior is incompatible with western society. Or we can just keep teaching nonviolent criminals (read: black and poor people) how to most effectively commit violent crimes. It's actually kinda funny how stupid Americans are about this topic. I read a story about an Egyptian activist who was imprisoned for speaking out against his country's leadership. He said there were thousands of people in the prison in the same situation as him- they were innocent of any real crime. Well guess what- it turns out that when you're falsely imprisoned in a prison with a bunch of ISIS members, that it's not too difficult for said ISIS members to indoctrinate you. I mean those people on the outside of the prison that these ISIS members are saying are horrible; they just threw you in a cage for nothing. It doesn't take a psychologist to trace that line of reasoning. (edit for clarification:) The point of this story was to show how effectively the imprisonment of nonviolent people endangers us all. Cops are literally, and purposefully, making you (YES YOU!) less safe. Fucking vote about it.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : Our justice system is a giant racket. One article I read pointed out that the actual level of crime reduction created by mass incarceration is about as low as 2% of the overall crime rate. Okay, so maybe it isn\'t *totally* useless. It made things an optimistic 2% better. I mean it had to ruin millions of lives and entire communities in order to get that 2%, but hey who cares about poor people right? Important thing is rich white people *feel* safe and *feel* like "justice" (whatever that is) is being served (so long as it\'s not to them, get me?) I tell people I\'m in favor of abolishing prisons and they look at me like I\'m insane. Basic reality is that there is very, very, few people in this society that are a threat to literally everybody around them. Most people in our prisons are there for drug related shit or petty offenses that are not going to be made better via chucking them into a cage for 20 years and forcing them to work for a corporation. You really care about crime in this country? Pour money into education, into decent housing, give people opportunities to build a better life for themselves. Focus less on punishment and more on rehabilitation. Invest in mental health care. Help communities deal with their own problems instead of imposing the will of the state on them. But there\'s no money in that shit, you see. So a giant, Kafkaesque bureaucracy, profiteering, and the widespread devastation of human life is what we get instead', ">>{odoroustobacco} : Many prisoners don't even have high school diplomas. That shit's free regardless.", '>>{odoroustobacco} : Watched that documentary my first semester of grad school. Real eye-opener. **This is why policy is important.**', ">>{oldoneeyed} : Americans are for some reason under the delusion that the police and the courts exist to protect them. They don't. They exist to protect the status quo in our society. Whether that overlaps with your own personal problems or not is irrelevant. The police are not your friends, judges are not your friends, politicians are not your friends. They don't give a shit about you and never will. There has never, ever, *ever* been a point in human history when the courts and prisons worked for the benefit of regular people. All of this shit exists as a means of control. That's its only reason for existence: to ensure that powerful people are not threatened by the rest of the country and to make sure that we go along with them.", '>>{FakeAccount84} : It\'s not "dressed up." It\'s literal slavery, as allowed by the thirteenth amendment. >Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, **except as a punishment for crime**', '>>{yeauxlo} : Food shelter and education is free. At least they need to do some labor to earn it', '>>{yeauxlo} : Sure they can. There are all kinds of jobs society needs done that dont require education', '>>{yeauxlo} : Proof? If you dont give them a get out of work card with free health insurance and education they wont commit crimes maybe', '>>{yeauxlo} : Uh why not just give them labor so they make up for their crime with labor instead of rewarding them with free education funded by law abiding citizens for law abiding citizens', ">>{odoroustobacco} : So that they don't reoffend due to lack of opportunity when they're released. Do you think if a person goes to jail once they're done as a person for the rest of their lives?", '>>{jschuch82} : Billions of dollars are spent in our prisons to "rehabilitate", but as most of the public are apathetic to the plight of prisoners most of this is a total waste. Gaurds and civilian teachers and the like are a joke. The largest percentage of our prisoners are substance abusers who could be treated far cheaper than the cost of incarceration. The drug war needs to be ended first and most importantly the way our prisoners are treated has to change.', ">>{dendaddy} : It will take you just as long as it would me to Google it and see it's true.", '>>{iloveamericandsocanu} : So basically just imprison them for life if you know they are going to commit crime anyway. Steal something, go to jail for the rest of your life. Get caught using drugs, prison for the rest of your life. Why not just cut out the middle man and become more like the Philippines', '>>{TheChinchilla914} : *Will vote democrat Not discussing the morality of it, just letting you know the practical effect', ">>{JonnyVegas22} : Wow the police have a lot of control over you. They can take you from a lowly non-violent offender and completely mold you into a violent killer. Noted. Guess I just won't get arrested for breaking the law, thank you kind stranger.", '>>{fat_osvaldo} : > its purpose is retribution rather than rehabilitation. The majority does not care what happens to people convicted of crimes, either in prison or afterwards; or they actively support the status quo You hit the nail on the head right there. I firmly believe we should make an effort to assist former felons with obtaining jobs.', ">>{PlasticPilot11} : Non-violent offenders can earn work release in a prison nearby me. They get paid by local businesses to do work in manufacturing plants and such. It's a great program, the prisoners earn money to pay back restitution to the state and to save for themselves/families. In this program, its optional. Not slavery.", ">>{SamusBaratheon} : Or just arrested. You don't need to have done anything to be arrested", ">>{JonnyVegas22} : Still the control is amazing, I'll be mindful of it. I thought I had more choice in the type of person I am. Edit: word", '>>{midgetman433} : how do you know though? is it based on demographics? b/c 40% the population is non hispanic white, and 20% is hispanic and 40% african american. even if they all voted 100% for democrats, it still wouldnt be moral to deny them the right to vote. this type of disenfranchisement reminds me of the things southern democrats would do to prevent freed slaves from voting for republicans.', ">>{504090} : It costs much more money for criminals to continue getting arrested and serve sentences than to help them transition into society through a program. I don't think you know how fucked convicts and ex-convicts are, in and out of jail. In jail, they're enslaved and worked for hours. Out of jail, it's extremely difficult for them to find jobs and become a functioning member of society. Again, rehabilitation isn't free education, and we aren't rewarding them by helping them get out of a rigged system. I envision it being more than just a class. Ideally, it should be a program that can help them find jobs and a new outlook on lifestyle.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Half of the nation is voting a president who might do just that. If they get their way thats the democratic way', '>>{RomanNumeralVI} : > You really care about crime in this country? Pour money into education, into decent housing, give people opportunities to build a better life for themselves. [We have been doing this since about 1966](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/national/great-society-at-50/), 50 years ago. Crime is way up since we began to do what you suggest. [Chicago experienced a major rise in violent crime starting in the late 1960s, a decline in overall crime in the 2000s, and then a rebound in overall murders the mid-2010s](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Chicago) The Baltimore schools get more money than any other district but one. Maryland is the richest state and the bluest state as well. Has this reduced crime in Baltimore?', ">>{Elbowsmell} : I don't get what your argument is here. Are you mistaking my analysis of our prisons as being a breeding ground for violence with some sort of super natural power that cops have to transform people? You know that's not what I said at all, right? I get it, you're in control of your choices and that's great. But if you were in a jail or prison you wouldn't be and, by the time you got out, you would be a different person. More than likely, you'd be a more violent person. Now, under the very obviously true condition that all prisons are breeding grounds for violence and violent behavior, wouldn't you agree that sending nonviolent people there is in no one's best interest?", '>>{RomanNumeralVI} : Nope. Those slaves would upon arrival laugh at the suggestion that criminals should not work while in prison. The 13th Amendment makes slavery while *in prison* legal. Slavery has made a huge comeback in the last decade globally. [The old African slave markets have reopened](http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/who-will-buy-boko-haram-s-200-kidnapped-girls-modern-slave-markets-west-africa-1447734). If you want to know what slavery *really is* you should visit a modern slave market. [ISIS will sell you a sex slave for $170](http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/11/05/isis-sex-slave-markets-are-a-modern-repeat-of-barbary-pirate-slavery-trade/). Our Middle East policy has had the downside of reopening the slave markets closed so long ago.', ">>{odoroustobacco} : So then what are they supposed to do with their time? Idle hands, you know? You don't strike me as someone who does a lot of critical thinking though.", '>>{yeauxlo} : How about prison labor? Funny criticism about critical thinking when the alternative to providing free education incentive for crime is listed right in the submission title.', ">>{yeauxlo} : If they are sincerely apologetic and sincere about reformation, they won't commit more crime. If they're naturally inclined to crime...they must do the time?", ">>{yeauxlo} : If they're naturally inclined to crime let them rot in prison. If they care about reformation, they will reform. We need it to be a deterrent not a fucking place to go for free shelter, insurance, and a degree while doing nothing for society.", ">>{odoroustobacco} : Yeah except the labor they provide doesn't teach them any meaningful skills and is used by the companies to lower costs and increase profits--aka exploit. Fuck prison labor, and fuck anyone that doesn't want prisoners to learn skills that will keep them out of the system.", '>>{yeauxlo} : Most criminals tried to lower cost, increase their profits, and exploit honest people. They need to pay it back', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Overall crime rates are at their lowest levels in decades. The few pockets that buck that trend are ironically a product of the drug war and mass incarceration.', '>>{JonnyVegas22} : Well you likened putting Egyptian activists into jail and popping out members of ISIS so maybe calm down the rhetoric so I can tell if you\'re engaging in a real conversation or just adding to the sensationalism around criminal justice reform. If you think that your average 40 hour a week cop thinks beyond doing his job safely and getting home at the end of the day, so much so that he is actively thinking about this like it was "burned into his mind in training" you\'re way overthinking this. You may have anecdotal evidence to the contrary, but that, an argument does not make. And lastly you\'re placing all of the blame of violent offenders on police and completely taking away the fact that some people are just going to turn out that way regardless of arrest or jailing. You\'re not going to get rid of jailing people for non-violent offenses, it is necessary in some cases, but you sure as hell can assign some responsibility to people outside of a uniform.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Because the war on drugs creates violence and mass incarceration destabilizes entire communities. I just went over that. Add to that the economic impact of the recession (which never really ended for poor people) and...well, bam. Pretty much all of the violence in Chicago is drug related. Ask yourself why that is.', ">>{TheChinchilla914} : I'd put all money on the fact that 75%+ of convicted felons in FL would vote Democrat"], [">>{Ardeet} : I'm not an American but even I have a bit of difficulty in trusting Bernie anymore. Unfortunately the article on intimated, rather than stated, what his position might be. Anyone know the real story?", ">>{TurboThoughts} : He'll stump for Hillary because he said he would. But everyone in their right mind knows he's not working that hard for her. If say Kasich were running instead of Trump, Bernie probably wouldn't bother.", '>>{Ardeet} : Yep, you may be right p, however his about face is probably going to stick in the craw of his supporters for some time.', ">>{vertigo7__} : Its not really an about face. He dropped and backed Hillary when his chances were basically 0. What he did do is made a deal with Hillary for said backing. She has already made a speech about supporting free colleges that was among Sanders top of the list of things to do. >Hillary Clinton released a debt free college plan that we developed together which now includes free tuition at public colleges and universities for working families. This was a major part of our campaign's agenda and a proposal that, if enacted into law, would revolutionize higher education in this country. http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/13/bernie-sanders-why-i-endorsed-hillary-clinton-commentary.html Also remember that he was running not for the presidency but to start a revolution in the country that would gain traction for the 2018 Senate elections and then even more so for the 2022 elections. Without a foundation the presidential position has no teeth to enact their goals/promises as we seen with Obama.", '>>{balmergrl} : He didn\'t do an "about face", he kept his word from the beginning and not because he signed some silly pledge, but because he has integrity even if the DNC leadership does not. I was fully vested in his campaign, donated my max and my husband was a del in Philly. As much as I\'m disgusted by this election cycle, my faith in Bernie\'s character has never faltered. I know many people who wish he didn\'t stick to his word to support the nominee because how the DNC treated him and Hillary\'s VP pick, but no one who considers it an about face.', '>>{Jas9191} : Nah, Bernie supporter here. Hes livin up to his word despite boos from his supporters - makes me respect him and what he claims he will do even more.', '>>{Ardeet} : Maybe you can clarify something for me then. I thought that he was very much against (even verging on detesting) the money and corruption in Wall St and its influence in politics. Did I get the wrong impression of this?', '>>{Jas9191} : No, he detests it. His choices were endorse Clinton and see her win. dont endorse her, maybe she wins. denounce her she probably loses. run against her she definitely loses. He chose the first choice which was one of the only two reasonable ones', ">>{Ardeet} : Thanks for that. I'm not having a go at you with the previous and following questions, it's just useful to discuss things like this in a decent back and forth conversation. I can see your reasoning as you laid it out however that was also the point I was making. I would have thought that someone who supported Bernie shared very similar views to him, so the idea that he supported the very type of candidate he despises would be highly unpalatable in my book. (of course, another point of view is that Clinton is not so beholden to Wall St as I perceive?).", ">>{Jas9191} : Yea, exactly. But there's always another side. He also promised to support the nominee of the race he was agreeing to enter. He's a man of his word and followed through. I dont have to like his decision to believe it was the correct one.", ">>{Ardeet} : Ok, that's an interesting point. Thanks for the polite back and forth."], ['>>{mikoul} : Quebec massacre suspect, 27, a fan of Trump, far right French politician', '>>{Crimewatchhamilton} : Who cares? Are we going to start examining the political leanings of all our killers.', '>>{pseudolocus} : Oh, so it only matters when it will support your arguments. Gotcha.', ">>{meatmountain} : but.. but.. isn't that why the Muslim Ban is in effect? Point is.. terrorism in this country comes primarily from internal far-right elements and from countries that are not on the Muslim Ban list...", '>>{scoopinresponse} : Do we just stop caring about motive for some reason? I mean we\'ve got a certain press secretary saying "See? This is why we need better border security." because he thinks this person is an Islamic terrorist, but it turns out he loves the god-emperor so that kind of information is important.', '>>{ElizabethAnnWashingt} : And if he was on the other end of the political Spectrum no one would report or care what his politics were and say it was around', ">>{DC25NYC} : So its the left/media's fault that young radicalized white men like to shoot up places of worship?", '>>{lovely_sombrero} : These are radical ~~islamic~~ right-wing terrorists and ~~she~~ he won\'t even mention the word, and nor will ~~President Obama~~ Steve Bannon. He won\'t use the term ‘radical ~~Islamic~~ right-wing terrorism,’ "Now, to solve a problem, you have to be able to state what the problem is or at least say the name. ~~She~~ Trump won\'t say the name and ~~President Obama~~ Steve Bannon won\'t say the name. But the name is there. It\'s radical ~~Islamic~~ right-wing terror." - Will Trump say the name? Or is he too politically correct? Political correctness is killing us, folks. Let me tell you. We have to get rid of all of those politically correct politicians.', '>>{treerat} : >Are we going to start examining the political leanings of all our killers. Isnt that exactly what Trump is doing?', '>>{Rupperrt} : If they killed for their ideology, in other words committed a terror attack, yes, we should examine it.', ">>{volares} : No it's Obamas fault that right wing extremists are easily converted to right wing extremist islamic terrorism.", '>>{Trump-ology-XENU} : radical white teenage terrorists responsible for over 200+ school murders in the last decade.', ">>{President_Tantrump} : I'm like NASCAR. People watch me for the incidents - POTUS", '>>{IHateMundays-} : Again. Not explicitly about US Politics. Mods, please remove this nonsense. Thank you.', ">>{SSeaborn} : Trump implements Muslim ban. International terrorist attack on a Muslim center from a Trump supporter. You really can't comprehend the connection? Honestly?", '>>{yourlyingalready} : Another example of Radical Rightwing terrorism. Who wants to take a stab at what his reddit account name was? Probably was a regular contributor to the_donald and altright.', ">>{ChickenPotPi} : People need to remember what this fuck face did, (don't remember the person) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik born 13 February 1979) is a Norwegian **far-right terrorist** who committed the 2011 Norway attacks. On 22 July 2011 he killed eight people by detonating a van bomb amid the Regjeringskvartalet in Oslo, then shot dead 69 participants of a Workers' Youth League (AUF) summer camp on the island of Utøya.[7][8] In August 2012 he was convicted of mass murder, causing a fatal explosion, and terrorism.[9][10]", '>>{branamuffin} : We have a radical conservative terrorist problem. I wish the president could say the words.', ">>{anisaerah} : this wasn't extremist Islamic terrorism, this was white supremacist terrorism against Muslims.", '>>{ChickenPotPi} : To further, he is a little bitch >Plans for hunger strikes[edit] >In November 2012, Breivik wrote a 27-page letter of complaint to the prison authorities about the security restrictions he was being held under, claiming that the prison director personally wanted to punish him. Among his complaints were that his cell is not adequately heated and he has to wear three layers of clothing to stay warm, guards interfere with his strictly-planned daily schedule, **his cell is poorly decorated and has no view, his reading lamp is inadequate**, guards supervise him while he is brushing his teeth and shaving and **put indirect mental pressure on him to finish quickly by tapping their feet while waiting**, **he is "not having candy" and he is served cold coffee**, and he is strip-searched daily, sometimes by female guards. Authorities only lifted one minor restriction against Breivik; his rubber safety pen, which he described as an "almost indescribable manifestation of sadism," was replaced with an ordinary pen.[143] >**In letters to foreign media outlets he told about his demands (in 2013) to prison authorities "including easier communication with the outside world and a PlayStation 3 to replace the current PlayStation 2, because it offers more suitable games";** media reported in 2014 about demands that **he would starve himself to death if refused "access to a sofa and a bigger gym"**; furthermore he said that "**Other inmates have access to adult games while I only have the right to play less interesting kids’ games**. One example is ‘Rayman Revolution,’ a game aimed at 3-year-olds," Breivik complained to prison officials."[144][145] >In September 2015, Breivik again threatened a hunger strike, because of deteriorating prison conditions,[132] but delayed in order to sue the Norwegian Government over prison conditions. He murdered 77 people and injured 319 and bitches about cold coffee and not having a PS3. Oh and now he is converted to full Nazi, not Neo Nazi.', '>>{mikoul} : We should know soon since all his social accounts have been took over by the SQ (Police), but the would surely use his account also to discover other extremists in his virtual friends in forum etc...', '>>{mikoul} : He was **directly** influenced by your **POTUS** Donald Trump and **USA** policies like the ban on emigrants. He told this HIMSELF to the police during his interrogation.', ">>{mikoul} : No, but when the radical far right killer say themself that he was motivated directly by US POTUS Trump and his policies it's worth of mention. ;-) ***#*reality**", '>>{TurtleStrangulation} : > He told this HIMSELF to the police **during his interrogation**. source?', ">>{SpookyKid94} : This is why collectivism is bullshit. If you believe the actions of Islamists(please look it up and understand that I'm not talking about Islam as a religion) or Nazis represent all Middle Eastern or White people, then you aren't a rational person. We have to stop looking at the world as general groups and respect people as individuals.", '>>{MackLuster77} : Why is the alcoholic, wife-beating slob in a suit?', '>>{RichardThe3} : Well, Sean Spicer, the WH Press Secretary, released a statement seeming to imply it *is* relevant.', '>>{ghaznione} : When are you going to say liberal terrorism? Liberals kidnapped and tortured a disabled trump supporter on Facebook live for 2 days. Liberal left wing terrorism.', '>>{Old_Army90} : I had cold coffee this morning, not by choice. Where do I get my Nazi application?', '>>{philly47} : Why do all these white nationalist nazis have a certain "effeminate" look?', ">>{Old_Army90} : There haven't been many recent left-wing terror attacks for precedence.", ">>{Old_Army90} : I don't think that law enforcement released an official motive for it yet, unless they did recently and I missed it.", '>>{mrupvot3s} : Fuck outta here with that. Thugs != liberals. Weak ass troll', ">>{outfishin} : This is not a joke and I'm sick of seeing this here from people pretending to care about Muslims. People were shot during prayer. 6 dead and 19 wounded. They have families who are mourning, not making these asinine jokes. I've talked to the Muslims in my community, they are worried about the copycat killers that show up after an event like this. Many mosques have increased security and are on high alert for people who are acting suspicious. Reach out to Muslims and tell them that you support them and you stand with them. The same happened to Christian churches after a bombing in Egypt in December and many from the Muslim community went out to support them. Don't turn these tragedies into political antagonist comedy when people are still mourning.", ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : Who are you talking about? Who said he was motivated by Trump? What you're saying is fake news. Quite simply you made that up.", ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : No, Trump banned people from unstable regions. I'm not sure why Americans keep getting this wrong. Heck, these are the same counties the Obama administration suggested be temporary restricted.", ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : That's a lie. You simply made that up. You're a fear monger, pushing fake news to further your political agenda.", ">>{brokenlife18} : Actually that was the media's narrative and false posting from The Donald. We don't release any information about suspects until they have gone to court in Canada. Anything that was posted before the police released info was pure speculation and people making up information to suit their narrative. As well isn't it possible that he could have been screaming it as a way to mock the victims? It's pretty easy for anyone to say the phrase. The Muslim victims were also in prayer so witness could have over heard another person saying it and mistakenly thought it was said by the shooter during the confusion. It's absolutely appalling that the media (particularly the US media) and people decided to run with the narrative that it was Muslim shooter based on no facts other than they had arrested a man from Morocco or that it couldn't possible be a white nationalist so it had to be a Muslim convert when it was shown it was a white man. Then to spread lies of a coverup because info wasn't given right way when in Canada we don't release information on an ongoing investigation until we have all the facts. Quite honestly all those people who jumped to conclusions and shouted it's a Muslim or it's an immigrant or refugee are very much racists and should seriously look at why they jumped to the conclusions they did.", ">>{mikoul} : > Who said he was motivated by Trump? Himself the killer, learn to read the news I'm from Quebec by the way.", ">>{volares} : Point standing it's all right wing extremism branded differently.", '>>{treerat} : But not from unstable regions where he does business. We arent getting it wrong. You need to find other sources than Fox News. They sell a false narrative. Zero immigrants from the banned countries have committed acts of terrorism in the US. Unbanned countries include Saudi (9/11) Arabia, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The most recent act of terrorism was in Canada, by a Canadian Trump supporter. The silence on this one is deafening. Why doesnt Trump want to ban Canadians? At least you acknowledge its a ban.', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : I've noticed you've said that in multiple posts, making me doubt you're actually in Quebec. I'm in Kingston by the way. I've read the news. Not a single article has that bullshit.", ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : I'm Canadian. I don't have cable television, let along Fox news. That's simply false. I remember a Somali man attacking four people with a machete in Feb 2016 in Ohio. Regardless, isn't that the point? These areas have been identified ad terrorist hot spots due to a lack of stability (often US influenced). Of course it's not a Muslim ban.", ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : Well yes, he and historically all of your governments have favoured select nations. Hence why Communist China has been given a free pass. Let's not pretend Saudi Arabia has been treated equally for the last 60 years, lol. All of your President have favoured S.A. for economic reasons. That's indisputable.", '>>{NorthChan} : Which side, the left or the right, do you find more nationalistic? Keeping in mind that the basic difference between left and right is that conservatives believe in states rights and small government, and liberals believe in federal rights and big government. You know, basic concepts that are taught in any government or politics course in every college in the world. In your own thoughts and deep knowledge of government please tell me what the difference is to you, and which one is more nationalistic.', ">>{treerat} : >[Law enforcement officials told NBC News that Artan was a Somali refugee who left his homeland with his family in 2007, **lived in Pakistan** and then came to the United States in 2014 as a legal permanent resident.](http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/suspect-dead-after-ohio-state-university-car-knife-attack-n689076) Pakistan is not on the Muslim ban list. Sounds like that's where he might have been radicalized. Of course its a Muslim ban. They even admitted it.", ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : Huh? The point was he was a Somali. Again, it's a 120 day order. No one has the right to come to America, it's a privilege. It's not a Muslim ban by definition, but essentially yes, of course it is. I applaud their courage. Islam and the West are not compatible.", '>>{treerat} : > Islam and the West are not compatible. You and the First Amendment are not compatible. >Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Now go be a good little boy and read up on the [Establishment clause](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Establishment_Clause). And next time, pay more attention in civics class. We are not yet a theocracy, no matter how hard the Reich wing is trying.', ">>{Crimewatchhamilton} : You're right. I'm Canadian, the first ammendment doesn't apply. Good thing the constitution doesn't say anything about restricting immigration from specific regions."], [">>{GaryRuppert} : Pro-Trump Millennials: 'Slap Yourself Upside of the Head' if You're Voting Hillary", '>>{RealPutin} : Thanks totes unbiased Breitbart, that one really made me change my mind. Edit: a quote from one of their millenials: >this type of “snowflake disposition and pussycat inclinations” from millennials is a major part of the “decline of America.” ...wat? I literally can\'t even, my pussycat inclinations have taken over and I can\'t respond, only mew. Also from him: >that his personal opinion of the millennials showcased in the USA Today article is that they shouldn’t vote if they can’t see that “America is exceptional." Right. If you think the country has problems, you shouldn\'t be able to vote to fix them. >"Trump is the furthest thing from a bigot and racist" Ok. Sure. From another one of their millenials: >Gesiotto also told Breitbart News that she suspects more millennial groups will be out supporting the GOP nominee once college Republican groups return to campus for the fall semester. Ok, great. More pro-Hill groups will be too, the simple fact that some millenials will be holding signs doesn\'t change that he\'s getting his ass whooped among college students. There\'s tons more shit in the actual article, I just picked 4 highlights.', ">>{Hillarys_Integrity} : I really don't like breitbart but the title has a point. Can you blame em? They haven't benefited once in modern politics. It's just a constant ass fuck of 3 inch dicks for them. Not so bad that it actually hurts, but it's still gay as hell.", '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : ***Breitbart.com:*** *Seriously, guys! We joined forces with Trump so you have to take us seriously now! God Emperor said so!*', ">>{GavinGT} : Anyone: slap yourself upside the head if you're reading Breitbart.", ">>{RealPutin} : Slapping myself won't undo the mental scarring of having read this piece", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Millenials want to benefit in modern American politics? Participate. Commenting on websites, or sitting around the apartment arguing the finer points of your PoliSci 212 mid-term don't mean squat. Millenials come out during Presidential elections pissed they have no voice, and then they are the lowest represented group at the polls by a margin. They are even worse off in off-year voting and they are almost non-existent on odd-years. They want a seat at the table? Do more than whine that the table is in another room. EDIT: I seem to have angered said younger voters who prefer to talk politics online versus being actively engaged. Oh well.", ">>{GavinGT} : - the internet - GPS - consumer protection - clean water and air - protection - financial aid I could go on and on. People take this stuff for granted. Try living in Cuba or some other shithole and then say the government doesn't do anything for us.", '>>{strav} : **Reads comment...** **Looks at username...** Yep seems about right. **Downvotes**', ">>{GavinGT} : I'll bet you weren't calling it rigged when Trump was winning. Trump sure wasn't.", ">>{Hillarys_Integrity} : Probably shouldn't of been rigged against them to fail the entire time. They just happened to be the generation where the shit hit the fan. Not their fault, their parents and grand parents generation didn't see the writing on the wall, or didn't feel like their civic duty was more righteous than their own personal gain. Maybe the stupid fucks that stay glued to their television shouldn't be allowed to vote. A simple google search can approve that it's probably the most wise decision. The generations before the millennials are the ones that voted in the corrupt piles of shit they're still seeing today. Where's the blame being accepted among the boomer generation? No where. No one wants to accept that they had it easier than the people they were supposed to provide for. It is pretty easy to see in the millennial's eyes. You want a civil war? This is how you get one. I'll watch the fireworks from my boat you stupid fucks. God damn idiots. Just throwing blame like nothing is ever their fault.", '>>{KderNacht} : Ah, the anti-SJW. Both are also known as a fucking idiot.', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Never open with "it was rigged against" type statements, because that\'s bullshit. Younger generations always ALWAYS vote significantly less than older generations. Those folks in their 60\'s now didn\'t vote in the 1970\'s and the people in their 50\'s didn\'t vote in the 1980\'s or 1990\'s. The largest voting block, 30-45? That\'s mine. We were a major reason Gore lost, because our turnout in swing states was pathetic. Every generation started voting when they reached an age and maturity where they realized that votes count and words don\'t. Younger voters screw themselves because they don\'t use their numbers. For every College Republican or Democratic Club member, there are 15 young adults sitting on their couch watching Netflix or playing a game who have no idea what the issues are. Wanna know why people 35-50 and 50+ vote for their own self interests? Because that\'s what people vote for. Don\'t expect older generations to give a shit about the younger ones. You should expect younger generations to give a shit about themselves.', '>>{timescrucial} : Seriously. More hateful rhetoric. What the fuck is going to happen to all that hate and rage when they lose in November?', ">>{Diarrheah} : I'm a millennial and I will be voting for Trump in November.", ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : Breibart is just conservative political commentary, dude. Take it for what it is, but it's not entirely to be discredited. They do occasionally make really valid points.", '>>{PeaSeaPrincipal} : > He does have a point; Millenials are seen as an utter embarrassment by all older generations and we do hope that the generation following them turns out very different. Bullshit. Assholes in older generations always insult the younger ones. No fucking surprises there. But their claims are baseless as fuck. Take your day-old account to fucking /r/The_Donald', ">>{PeaSeaPrincipal} : Bullshit. You don't talk well of an insane liar because occasionally they randomly, accidentally say something remotely true.", ">>{PeaSeaPrincipal} : I don't believe you, but whatever. Enjoy being a minority. Always worked out well for my black ass.", ">>{PeaSeaPrincipal} : It was four in the morning on the East Coast when you wrote that, and midnight on the West Coast. And it's the middle of a school week. If the people downvoting your are American, they almost certainly aren't millennials. More likely, they are Russian.", '>>{yakinikutabehoudai} : Wow. I feel if these Trump supporters actually attempted to do outreach on college campuses, they would actually drive people away from Trump.', '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : I cant even... is there better example of what he is talking about concerning millenials.', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : No, the real bullshit is that we are all going to vote for a running felon because she's the lesser of two evils.", '>>{kmmontandon} : > Millenials are seen as an utter embarrassment by all older generations 1996: "Gen X are seen as an utter embarrassment by all older generations ... etc." 1966: "Baby Boomers are seen as an utter embarrassment by all all older generations ..." Ad naseum.', ">>{sedgwickian} : > pussycat inclinations I think he's talking about internet cat videos...?", ">>{US-American} : Maybe Hillary will put some hair on these millennial's nuts when she ships them off to fight in Aleppo or Estonia. Toughen up these safe space needing pussies!", '>>{pm_me_your_cuck_pics} : *commences slapping* Feels so much better than a Trump presidency.', '>>{Roseking} : > felon: a person who has been convicted of a felony. I must have missed the news where they found her guilty of anything.', '>>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : Did you literally not read my post. I said "running felon" Do you not know what that is? A running felon?', '>>{salmonchaser} : A felon is a person who has been convicted of a felony. If she has not been convicted of a felony, she is not a felon.', '>>{the_other_50_percent} : “The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise.” - Socrates', ">>{frowningcat} : I find it so satisfying to downvote a Breitbart article, cause I'm clearly a terrorist loving slave to the liberal mainstream media (e.g. fox news)", ">>{kmmontandon} : > I'd say that the level of dislike (especially the lack of respect shown towards elders) is growing. No, *that's* a lazy argument, made generation after generation.", ">>{saturninus} : We can go deeper: >Thereafter, would that I were not among the men of the fifth generation, but either had died before or been born afterwards. For now truly is a race of iron, and men never rest from labour and sorrow by day, and from perishing by night; and the gods shall lay sore trouble upon them. But, notwithstanding, even these shall have some good mingled with their evils. And Zeus will destroy this race of mortal men also when they come to have grey hair on the temples at their birth. >The father will not agree with his children, nor the children with their father, nor guest with his host, nor comrade with comrade; nor will brother be dear to brother as aforetime. Men will dishonour their parents as they grow quickly old, and will carp at them, chiding them with bitter words, hard-hearted they, not knowing the fear of the gods. They will not repay their aged parents the cost their nurture, for might shall be their right: and one man will sack another's city. There will be no favour for the man who keeps his oath or for the just or for the good; but rather men will praise the evil-doer and his violent dealing. Strength will be right and reverence will cease to be; and the wicked will hurt the worthy man, speaking false words against him, and will swear an oath upon them. Envy, foul-mouthed, delighting in evil, with scowling face, will go along with wretched men one and all. >And then Aidos and Nemesis, with their sweet forms wrapped in white robes, will go from the wide-pathed earth and forsake mankind to join the company of the deathless gods: and bitter sorrows will be left for mortal men, and there will be no help against evil. >—Hesiod, Works and Days, II. 170-201", '>>{ivsciguy} : I think the Trump supporters have already taken enough blows to the head....']]

classify and reply

[">>{Nashvillain2} : This philosopher predicted Trump's rise in 1998 — and he has another warning for the left: Why Richard Rorty’s critique of the left is as relevant as ever", '>>{intravenus_de_milo} : did you see their convention? They have a ways to go.', '>>{ozric101} : Rorty also felt that Identity politics are cancer and all that matters any more are pragmatics.', '>>{OJSamson} : god i am so tired of those damn liberals fighting worker security, fighting to cut the minimum wage, and giving huge tax breaks to the rich. /s', '>>{dyzo-blue} : They put two former Republican Governors on the ticket. Are we sure that counts as a third party?', '>>{Desi_US} : ‘Down with Trump’ signs and tears at funeral for Kansas shooting victim in India', '>>{CommanderArcher} : and the other choices we have are also 2 republicans yet we call them crazy and democrats.', '>>{Qwikphaze} : No but I did see that cnn town hall and they were both excellent. They earned my vote.', '>>{noxylophone} : Actually, yes, those are the tenets of classical liberalism.', ">>{AdamSB08} : You mean the convention where Johnson and Weld were nominated? At least they didn't nominate Trump and his theocratic running mate.", ">>{Lochmon} : With rapid advances in automation and AI white-collar jobs are as likely to disappear as blue-collar jobs. When you're unemployed with no good prospects it doesn't matter what color collar you used to wear.", '>>{threwmeawah} : Which is not the same thing as modern liberalism.. So not "actually"', '>>{OJSamson} : what that the poor are divorced from reality? that they see the left fighting 2 battles, for the welfare of the poor and the rights of the discriminated, and think they should vote for party that continuously blocks the left from helping the poor.', ">>{GI_Malpractice_TA} : Republicans are going to have to drop a lot of their social issues if they hope to win again. They'll basically have to come closer to Libertarians on issues like abortion, prohibition, surveillance, same-sex marriage, and illegal immigration. And young Libertarians would be wise to get in on the ground floor of the post-Trump GOP. The US political landscape just isn't the same as it was 24 years ago. Social Conservatism can't carry the votes needed to win anymore.", '>>{OJSamson} : > Which is not the same thing as liberalism Market Liberalism = Neoliberalism (Ronald Reagan) Social Liberalism= Modern Liberalism (Elizabeth Warren)', '>>{antisoshal} : Trump has been a democrat all his life and has openly said so until recently.', '>>{comeherebob} : I think both camps in the Democratic party (the "centrists" and the "berniecrats") will read this article and immediately see the faults of the opposing camp. IMO both sides need one another, badly. Neither on their own are good enough.', '>>{OJSamson} : > all while raising taxes. http://www.richardfitchen.com/tag/war-in-afghanistan/ sure looks divorced from reality to me', '>>{ABSOLUTELY__BASED} : Is a funeral really the proper place to grandstand your politics?', '>>{antisoshal} : Exactly. The rise of snake oil Libertarianism where you only mention the side effects that coincide with what others want without really mentioning your real idealism and how utterly antithetic it is to all the voters you are trying to lure.', '>>{KSonOfCave} : It is if certain politics lead to the death of that person', '>>{AdamSB08} : I saw that on C-SPAN as it happened. The guy was removed from the hall and the delegates voted to revoke his membership in the Libertarian Party. Trump, on the other hand, was actually nominated by the Republican delegates!', ">>{ABSOLUTELY__BASED} : That's can set a disturbing precedent... Should there be anti war protests at soldiers' funerals? Pro-life protests at funerals where a failed abortion resulted in the death of the woman? Anti-gay marriage protests at the funerals of gay men who die as a result of AIDS? Anti gun protests at the funerals of homicide victims? Just doesn't seem right for any issue unless the family wanted that kind of statement made", ">>{ksplett} : Ehhh if I were an Indian man shot because some ~~radical right-wing terrorist~~ mentally ill man thought I was Middle-Eastern and wanted me to get out of my country I wouldn't mind if people used my funeral to ask serious questions about why people are doing this and why the President can't address it without creating a new agency that categorizes immigrant crimes in the same speech. That's just me though.", '>>{ABSOLUTELY__BASED} : Is saying "down with Trump" really doing that though?', '>>{AtomicKoala} : Why is it unreasonable to raise fuel taxes while investing in public transport given climate change? Blue states have big public transport investment projects, do Texas or Florida even have a single metro system between them?', ">>{KingJak117} : I agree. They're taking attention away from the person and putting it on their agenda. Just wait a day and have a march or something.", '>>{Freshy007} : You may want to talk to the Westboro church ppl. They blew up that precedent a long time ago', '>>{seanr9ne} : And they are also pretty much globally considered terrible people because of what they do.', '>>{druuconian} : I mean they are talking about the leader of a foreign country. Who denigrated immigrants repeatedly, and did more than any other single person to create a climate of fear, racism, and anti-immigrant sentiment in America. And you can easily draw a straight line from Trump\'s mouth to the bullet that killed this guy. So imagine, say, Justin Tredau had whipped up anti-American sentiment in Canada, and a friend of yours was killed in Canada by a Trudeau supporter who screamed "get out of my country you NASCAR-loving redneck piece of shit" as he shot him. I don\'t know about you, but I would be pretty mad at Justin Trudeau, even despite his overwhelming handsomeness.', '>>{intravenus_de_milo} : Honestly, the best thing that could happen to the LP is for the GOP to lose elections for the next *few years.*', '>>{threwmeawah} : Yep. Also, I would add that some people argue that conservatives are adherents of classical liberalism. I just wanted to point out that liberalism and liberals without a qualifier generally refers to social (or modern) liberalism. At least in the US.', ">>{urmotherismylover} : Absolutely. Emmett Till's open casket started the civil rights movement. Learn some history.", '>>{liberationation} : Or, you know, not all libertarians are Ayn Rand worshiping anarcho-capitalists.', '>>{liberationation} : Exactly this, the GOP has two directions it can choose in November: fully embrace Trumpism, or utterly reject it and move toward a pragmatic libertarianism. The former will result in a perpetually second place GOP as that demographic dies off, but the latter might be harder to achieve in the short run and will result in a temporarily destabilized GOP that tries to play down the shrinking but still existent 20% of Americans who are evangelicals. At the same time it needs to reject Goldwater-esque libertarianism and move more toward Jeffersonian Liberalism.', '>>{KingJak117} : Down with Trump as the title says.', ">>{AtomicKoala} : Modern liberalism as espoused by say, D66 or moderate Democrats isn't far off classical liberalism. It's a case of adapting to the times. But liberals have always been pro trade for example.", '>>{OJSamson} : and blue states are the states doing the best while red states have been cutting taxes, cutting welfare, taking in more federal funds, and have been doing worse overall.', '>>{threwmeawah} : Conservatives are closer to classical liberalism than Democrats. But yes, there are some shared beliefs', '>>{TrumpVotersAre2Blame} : I wonder how many will bother to read the article. 1) The Funeral was in India. I\'m assuming most of those commenting here are not experts on India or what is deemed acceptable etiquette at a funeral there. I\'m certainly not but I am also not the one judging them. 2) The article doesn\'t really talk much about the protests. It does mention two Indian Politicians holding signs (one said "Down with Trump" the other "Xenophobia in any form is unacceptable"). The only other mention is the caption of one photo that says "Mourners hold signs in front of the cremation pyre" (their signs say "Down with Trump" and "Down with Racism"). 3) This story is a big deal in India right now. As the article said.... *"Some Indians here have linked what they see as a rise of racism in the United States to Trump’s election. “We are all middle-class and lower-middle-class people, and we send our children abroad with hope,” said M. Rajkumar, president of an association for parents of Indians living abroad. “Many of our young prefer to go to America for higher education. . . . Now the situation has changed after Trump has become president of the United States. Racism is high, and this incident is a clear example.”* 4) I think it is far more offensive for Americans to tell the family or the people in India how to mourn. Everyone mourns differently. Furthermore there is really no way to separate the politics from what happened.', '>>{ozabelle} : not for inherently extremist, cult doctrines. it\'s their nature, by design. they are the "stain". such is the case with libertarianism. other examples can be found in religion, eg, jehovah\'s witnesses, the church of christ, westboro baptist, etc. otoh, a few potheads riding dirty and dreading a traffic stop do call themselves "libertarian" because they\'re too stoned to do homework.', ">>{AtomicKoala} : Conservatives in Europe maybe. Conservativism in America is dead. It's been squeezed between the centre to centre right moderate Democrat and the increasingly radicalised reactionaries of the GOP.", '>>{threwmeawah} : This is why I chose to say Conservatives instead of Republicans. There is no shortage of people claiming to be "conservatives," but this election and this presidency have shown there aren\'t many actual Conservatives', ">>{AtomicKoala} : What's happening in the US is almost a regression back to the mid to late 19th century, when conservatives were opposed to free market capitalism, instead fighting pro-capitalism, pro-trade liberals to try to protect the vestiges of feudalism. Someone more knowledgeable than me should do a write up. In Europe the far right arose with little backing from the moneyed aristocracy. In the US, the GOP already had that backing, the far right simply took over the party, creating that parallel.", ">>{liberationation} : That's not libertarianism, and it saddens me that you've been so horribly misled.", ">>{ozabelle} : take heart, jehovah's witnesses and members of westboro baptist or the church of christ are likewise promptly and reflexively saddened by others' woeful misunderstandings of who they are and what they are honestly like. that's how cultists always feel when observers describe them. how else could they feel, or you?", '>>{druuconian} : So your theory here is that Indian people should not denounce Donald Trump?', '>>{liberationation} : Lol, you are being delusional and reflexive yourself, not me. Point to what I have said that is "cult like" please, I\'d like to know.', ">>{ozabelle} : you actually haven't dared to say much, probably because u just don't know much, and are scared others will found that out.", ">>{TheFairyGuineaPig} : Yes? It's fairly obvious they Blame trump got legitimising or inciting this violence.", '>>{DogFishHead60MinIPA} : I always hear people say how libertarians are crazy and they believe in all of this crazy shit. The fact of the matter is, Gary Johnson is very moderate and very reasonable, and he was selected by the libertarian party as their nominee. Meanwhile, the Democrats and Republicans nominated Trump and Hillary. So, which party is actually crazy?', ">>{upstateman} : If the LP gets 5% of the vote because Republicans can't stand Trump that does not mean 5% are now libertarians. It just means that the LP appears more Republican than the Democrats or the Greens. they are not changing their ideology.", '>>{_personofdisinterest} : The funeral was in India attended by Indian people.', ">>{upstateman} : 40% of Romney's vote came from White Evangelicals. Dropping them means they are a small party.", ">>{Suitcase_Johnson} : Oh no! Things are getting out of control! Quick, now we need to give a few scraps the proles before they outright revolt! ... We're only votes to them. A reasource to be exploited and controlled. This is the flaw of representative democracy. The genie is out of the bottle now anyway. Fascism is here, fight or be crushed.", ">>{KingJak117} : I'm saying have some class and don't do it at the freaking funeral.", ">>{druuconian} : I mean is the family upset? I've heard the family criticize Trump as well. I agree it's tasteless if the family didn't want any anti-Trump signs at the funeral, but if they're cool with it I don't see how we have any standing to say it's illegitimate.", ">>{subsonic87} : Fantastic article, despite the clickbaity headline. Examines the divisiveness of identity politics, while also acknowledging that they were necessary (and reduced society's barbarism).", '>>{upstateman} : They are going to move to a movement conservative. A Ted Cruz without the charisma.', ">>{delta512} : Right? Two successful republican governors in democratic states are batshit insane because of the party they're affilated with, but a reality tv star and compulsive liar are 100% legit. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills watching this election.", ">>{KSonOfCave} : The funeral was in India, protested by the people effected. The family has been very vocal against trump, and have gone on record warning others of coming here and that Trump has refused to even personally acknowledge the attack while taking every chance to hold up violence immigrants commit. I'd say it's a special circumstance and from what I can find, the family isn't bothered. If the family and people effected are down, it shouldn't be an issue.", ">>{Bluthhousing} : Chill Brotendo! What's wrong with wanting to legalize weed, not waste money unnecessarily, and not destroy the middle east and Latin America.", ">>{liberationation} : Then they'll shoot themselves. More millennials are voting for Gary Johnson than Trump, eventually these people will get older as trump's base dies.", '>>{MWM2} : ["Signs"?](https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1024w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/02/28/Foreign/Images/India_US_Bar_Shooting_Cremation_77178-fb9a7.jpg?uuid=2pyplv3GEeaZtJ5hOv6wnw) It\'s disgusting that WaPo headlines are often Buzzfeed-worthy.', ">>{ozabelle} : i have yet to encounter a libertarian who wasn't ignorant, arrogant, and argumentative. they're like door to door evangelists who haven't bothered to read their bibles but nevertheless want us to pretend that they have. lifetip: if you want to be a salesman, or even just pretend to be a salesman, familiarize yourself with your product -before- you present it. otherwise you'll come off as a mix of lazy, crazy, and stupid.", '>>{MWM2} : You might want to consult a map. India is not located in the United States.', '>>{scotfarkas} : moving from 40% actual voters to 30% potential voters is poor math.', '>>{subsonic87} : Not quite true, at least according to the Vox article: > Rorty’s concern was not that the left cared too much about race relations or discrimination (it should care about these things); rather, he warned that it stopped doing the hard work of liberal democratic politics. He worried that it’s retreat into academia, into theory and away from the concrete, would prove politically disastrous.', ">>{data2dave} : Seems though the writer endorsed Sander's wing at the end of article. The Centrists need to stop sucking Wall Street's nipple and join with the Progressive wing of party.", ">>{malpais} : >IMO both sides need one another, badly. Neither on their own are good enough. That is how I read it. And I think it's how it was intended.", '>>{atnorman} : Vox really misrepresented Rorty. But Rorty was also nutty, so w/e.', ">>{upstateman} : > Then they'll shoot themselves. Yep. But until a movement conservative loses they will continue to think the problem is they didn't have a true conservative running. This should have been that year but Trump threw himself in as a curve ball. So they get to try again.", '>>{DaZuhalter} : Trump has actually flipped back and forth between the parties', ">>{MrSparks4} : Anti racism marches for Emmit Till? A soldier goes to war as a choice to protect their country, some soldiers are anti war, protesting with an anti way sentiment makes little sense. Abortion is a choice and death is an accident, not the intent. Gay marriage doesn't cause AIDS or death from AIDS, unprotected sex spreads AIDS. That Indian man was minding his own business when he was gunned down by a racist prick. He didn't chose to be shot.", '>>{puntiospilatos} : Trump has actually flipped back and forth between the words of the same sentence. FTFY', ">>{comeherebob} : I think you’ve missed the point of the article. Your comment here is basically saying, “Abandon all your deeply held convictions and side with progressives.” Why? Because the US is such a left-wing country? No, they’re not – Americans skew much more conservative than other Western countries, which is probably why left-wing progressives like Teachout won even fewer votes than Clinton did. I *know* that a lot of Americans are a little more fiscally conservative than the progressives and see the protectionist stances as dangerous – I know because I am one! That doesn’t mean I don’t root for Bernie or Warren when they’re on the floor, it just means I don’t agree with them 100% of the time. But totally abandoning what I think is right and moving drastically to the left would be 1) giving up on my own convictions, which I thought Sanders warned against, and 2) not even a winning strategy! What the Sanders wing should be teaching centrists is how to realign their message as one that resonates with the working class. This doesn’t mean we all need to move left, it means we need to focus on showing blue-collar workers how the Democrats actually *are* working in their best interest (including globalisation). We need to go back to being a big tent party who still has room for the Manchins, who wouldn’t be able to hold onto their seats in West Virginia if they went full Sanders (and shouldn’t *have* to, just because a few progressives think that he's impure for not living up to every one of their standards). That means leaving purity tests at the door and being willing to work with people who don’t agree with you on every single issue ever.", ">>{bexmex} : Wages declined because REPUBLICANS passed right-to-work laws, slashed education, blocked minimum wage increases, blocked Obama's jobs bills, and blocked Obama's job retraining. And yes, that stuff costs money, so liberals support tax hikes ON THE RICH to pay for it all. If you think people will fall for your obvious lies backed up with ZERO evidence, you're on the wrong sub.", '>>{Amrokmfc} : He is a handsome man, isn\'t he? I feel that Canada is leading the "Handsomest/Prettiest Leader" contest by a lot. Though there is that King and his wife...', '>>{chainersedict} : >Before the cremation, the family washed and prepared the body of Srinivas Kuchibhotla, 32, outside their home in a gated community near Hyderabad called Bachupally. The victim’s wife, Sunayana Dumala, and his mother wept, and the older woman had to be revived after fainting.', '>>{noxylophone} : Also tenets of neoliberalism, which you may have heard of.', ">>{mkm18} : Maybe, but it's too vague a concept to be encoded in law either way anyway", '>>{noxylophone} : Both parties largely hew to classical liberal economic ideas, hence the term "neoliberal."', ">>{19djafoij02} : 5) This is a case study in how ethnic hate and radicalism begin. Indian Hindus haven't generally struggled with extremism and violent anti-Americanism for most of their history. A few American idiots with guns open fire or yell slurs at Hindus, perhaps mistaking then for Muslims (who have been experiencing a wave of violent extremism for the past 30-40 years) and the recognized, elected US government does little to condemn them. As a result, Indian Hindus become more angry and more susceptible to anti-American rhetoric. You're seeing the beginnings of a cycle of hatred here and both countries need to act to stop it.", ">>{bexmex} : This is in no way, shape, or form anything new. They've been saying it since the 1930s. Governments typically work for the rich and powerful, they only work for the little guy when we force them to. Capitalism, automation, and globalization *if done right* can make everybody's lives better. But there's also a good chance that wages will stagnate or even go backwards for the middle class if its done wrong... which is what we are seeing now. At which point, liberals will cling to SOCIALISM as the cure, and conservatives will cling to FASCISM as the cure. What we're seeing in America is exactly what happened in Europe a dozen times in the past 100 years. If the powers that be cant make government work for the people again, SOMEBODY is gonna smash the whole things to the ground. Trump wont succeed because he's so inept... but the next person probably would. Whether the next person is a socialist or a competent fascist is up for debate...", ">>{threwmeawah} : I don't get your point. He obviously was referring to social liberals (sarcastically), not neoliberals and definitely not classical liberals. Social liberals are diametrically opposed to all the policies he listed, hence the /s Is your point that classical liberalism and neoliberalism are bad? Ok, most people on this sub probably agree that most of their ideas are bad, bar free trade agreements which would have a more split opinion.", '>>{goody_heggety} : When a racist white-nationalist killed the person, yes.', ">>{data2dave} : I agree mostly as long as we don't go Republican-lite as Carter did, or Clinton did in his second term. Obama? Mostly the same but Republicans never would compromise with him, no matter when he tried.", ">>{goody_heggety} : The agenda of Indians not getting murdered in the US because they're brown?", '>>{goody_heggety} : Considering it was their family member who got murdered by a racist bigot, they can put up any damn signs they want.', ">>{goody_heggety} : Trump has encouraged and enabled these people. They think it's just fine to do this now, including murder.", '>>{Matasa89} : The parents put all of their effort into raising their boy, and he ended up a successful and beloved Garmin engineer... only to be killed in cold blood by some unwashed redneck that was screaming xenophobia. They need to be on suicide watch... for the rest of their lives.', ">>{Slampumpthejam} : Ya all his family and friends should suck it up and pretend they don't mind him being murdered in cold-blood by an ignorant bigot", '>>{mannabhai} : In India, funerals have always been used to grandstand politics.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{intravenus_de_milo} : did you see their convention? They have a ways to go.', '>>{dyzo-blue} : They put two former Republican Governors on the ticket. Are we sure that counts as a third party?', '>>{CommanderArcher} : and the other choices we have are also 2 republicans yet we call them crazy and democrats.', '>>{Qwikphaze} : No but I did see that cnn town hall and they were both excellent. They earned my vote.', ">>{AdamSB08} : You mean the convention where Johnson and Weld were nominated? At least they didn't nominate Trump and his theocratic running mate.", ">>{GI_Malpractice_TA} : Republicans are going to have to drop a lot of their social issues if they hope to win again. They'll basically have to come closer to Libertarians on issues like abortion, prohibition, surveillance, same-sex marriage, and illegal immigration. And young Libertarians would be wise to get in on the ground floor of the post-Trump GOP. The US political landscape just isn't the same as it was 24 years ago. Social Conservatism can't carry the votes needed to win anymore.", '>>{antisoshal} : Trump has been a democrat all his life and has openly said so until recently.', '>>{antisoshal} : Exactly. The rise of snake oil Libertarianism where you only mention the side effects that coincide with what others want without really mentioning your real idealism and how utterly antithetic it is to all the voters you are trying to lure.', '>>{AdamSB08} : I saw that on C-SPAN as it happened. The guy was removed from the hall and the delegates voted to revoke his membership in the Libertarian Party. Trump, on the other hand, was actually nominated by the Republican delegates!', '>>{intravenus_de_milo} : Honestly, the best thing that could happen to the LP is for the GOP to lose elections for the next *few years.*', '>>{liberationation} : Or, you know, not all libertarians are Ayn Rand worshiping anarcho-capitalists.', '>>{liberationation} : Exactly this, the GOP has two directions it can choose in November: fully embrace Trumpism, or utterly reject it and move toward a pragmatic libertarianism. The former will result in a perpetually second place GOP as that demographic dies off, but the latter might be harder to achieve in the short run and will result in a temporarily destabilized GOP that tries to play down the shrinking but still existent 20% of Americans who are evangelicals. At the same time it needs to reject Goldwater-esque libertarianism and move more toward Jeffersonian Liberalism.', '>>{ozabelle} : not for inherently extremist, cult doctrines. it\'s their nature, by design. they are the "stain". such is the case with libertarianism. other examples can be found in religion, eg, jehovah\'s witnesses, the church of christ, westboro baptist, etc. otoh, a few potheads riding dirty and dreading a traffic stop do call themselves "libertarian" because they\'re too stoned to do homework.', ">>{liberationation} : That's not libertarianism, and it saddens me that you've been so horribly misled.", ">>{ozabelle} : take heart, jehovah's witnesses and members of westboro baptist or the church of christ are likewise promptly and reflexively saddened by others' woeful misunderstandings of who they are and what they are honestly like. that's how cultists always feel when observers describe them. how else could they feel, or you?", '>>{liberationation} : Lol, you are being delusional and reflexive yourself, not me. Point to what I have said that is "cult like" please, I\'d like to know.', ">>{ozabelle} : you actually haven't dared to say much, probably because u just don't know much, and are scared others will found that out.", '>>{DogFishHead60MinIPA} : I always hear people say how libertarians are crazy and they believe in all of this crazy shit. The fact of the matter is, Gary Johnson is very moderate and very reasonable, and he was selected by the libertarian party as their nominee. Meanwhile, the Democrats and Republicans nominated Trump and Hillary. So, which party is actually crazy?', ">>{upstateman} : If the LP gets 5% of the vote because Republicans can't stand Trump that does not mean 5% are now libertarians. It just means that the LP appears more Republican than the Democrats or the Greens. they are not changing their ideology.", ">>{upstateman} : 40% of Romney's vote came from White Evangelicals. Dropping them means they are a small party.", '>>{upstateman} : They are going to move to a movement conservative. A Ted Cruz without the charisma.', ">>{delta512} : Right? Two successful republican governors in democratic states are batshit insane because of the party they're affilated with, but a reality tv star and compulsive liar are 100% legit. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills watching this election.", ">>{Bluthhousing} : Chill Brotendo! What's wrong with wanting to legalize weed, not waste money unnecessarily, and not destroy the middle east and Latin America.", ">>{liberationation} : Then they'll shoot themselves. More millennials are voting for Gary Johnson than Trump, eventually these people will get older as trump's base dies.", ">>{ozabelle} : i have yet to encounter a libertarian who wasn't ignorant, arrogant, and argumentative. they're like door to door evangelists who haven't bothered to read their bibles but nevertheless want us to pretend that they have. lifetip: if you want to be a salesman, or even just pretend to be a salesman, familiarize yourself with your product -before- you present it. otherwise you'll come off as a mix of lazy, crazy, and stupid.", '>>{scotfarkas} : moving from 40% actual voters to 30% potential voters is poor math.', ">>{upstateman} : > Then they'll shoot themselves. Yep. But until a movement conservative loses they will continue to think the problem is they didn't have a true conservative running. This should have been that year but Trump threw himself in as a curve ball. So they get to try again.", '>>{DaZuhalter} : Trump has actually flipped back and forth between the parties', '>>{puntiospilatos} : Trump has actually flipped back and forth between the words of the same sentence. FTFY'], ['>>{Desi_US} : ‘Down with Trump’ signs and tears at funeral for Kansas shooting victim in India', '>>{ABSOLUTELY__BASED} : Is a funeral really the proper place to grandstand your politics?', '>>{KSonOfCave} : It is if certain politics lead to the death of that person', ">>{ABSOLUTELY__BASED} : That's can set a disturbing precedent... Should there be anti war protests at soldiers' funerals? Pro-life protests at funerals where a failed abortion resulted in the death of the woman? Anti-gay marriage protests at the funerals of gay men who die as a result of AIDS? Anti gun protests at the funerals of homicide victims? Just doesn't seem right for any issue unless the family wanted that kind of statement made", ">>{ksplett} : Ehhh if I were an Indian man shot because some ~~radical right-wing terrorist~~ mentally ill man thought I was Middle-Eastern and wanted me to get out of my country I wouldn't mind if people used my funeral to ask serious questions about why people are doing this and why the President can't address it without creating a new agency that categorizes immigrant crimes in the same speech. That's just me though.", '>>{ABSOLUTELY__BASED} : Is saying "down with Trump" really doing that though?', ">>{KingJak117} : I agree. They're taking attention away from the person and putting it on their agenda. Just wait a day and have a march or something.", '>>{Freshy007} : You may want to talk to the Westboro church ppl. They blew up that precedent a long time ago', '>>{seanr9ne} : And they are also pretty much globally considered terrible people because of what they do.', '>>{druuconian} : I mean they are talking about the leader of a foreign country. Who denigrated immigrants repeatedly, and did more than any other single person to create a climate of fear, racism, and anti-immigrant sentiment in America. And you can easily draw a straight line from Trump\'s mouth to the bullet that killed this guy. So imagine, say, Justin Tredau had whipped up anti-American sentiment in Canada, and a friend of yours was killed in Canada by a Trudeau supporter who screamed "get out of my country you NASCAR-loving redneck piece of shit" as he shot him. I don\'t know about you, but I would be pretty mad at Justin Trudeau, even despite his overwhelming handsomeness.', ">>{urmotherismylover} : Absolutely. Emmett Till's open casket started the civil rights movement. Learn some history.", '>>{KingJak117} : Down with Trump as the title says.', '>>{TrumpVotersAre2Blame} : I wonder how many will bother to read the article. 1) The Funeral was in India. I\'m assuming most of those commenting here are not experts on India or what is deemed acceptable etiquette at a funeral there. I\'m certainly not but I am also not the one judging them. 2) The article doesn\'t really talk much about the protests. It does mention two Indian Politicians holding signs (one said "Down with Trump" the other "Xenophobia in any form is unacceptable"). The only other mention is the caption of one photo that says "Mourners hold signs in front of the cremation pyre" (their signs say "Down with Trump" and "Down with Racism"). 3) This story is a big deal in India right now. As the article said.... *"Some Indians here have linked what they see as a rise of racism in the United States to Trump’s election. “We are all middle-class and lower-middle-class people, and we send our children abroad with hope,” said M. Rajkumar, president of an association for parents of Indians living abroad. “Many of our young prefer to go to America for higher education. . . . Now the situation has changed after Trump has become president of the United States. Racism is high, and this incident is a clear example.”* 4) I think it is far more offensive for Americans to tell the family or the people in India how to mourn. Everyone mourns differently. Furthermore there is really no way to separate the politics from what happened.', '>>{druuconian} : So your theory here is that Indian people should not denounce Donald Trump?', ">>{TheFairyGuineaPig} : Yes? It's fairly obvious they Blame trump got legitimising or inciting this violence.", '>>{_personofdisinterest} : The funeral was in India attended by Indian people.', ">>{KingJak117} : I'm saying have some class and don't do it at the freaking funeral.", ">>{druuconian} : I mean is the family upset? I've heard the family criticize Trump as well. I agree it's tasteless if the family didn't want any anti-Trump signs at the funeral, but if they're cool with it I don't see how we have any standing to say it's illegitimate.", ">>{KSonOfCave} : The funeral was in India, protested by the people effected. The family has been very vocal against trump, and have gone on record warning others of coming here and that Trump has refused to even personally acknowledge the attack while taking every chance to hold up violence immigrants commit. I'd say it's a special circumstance and from what I can find, the family isn't bothered. If the family and people effected are down, it shouldn't be an issue.", '>>{MWM2} : ["Signs"?](https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1024w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/02/28/Foreign/Images/India_US_Bar_Shooting_Cremation_77178-fb9a7.jpg?uuid=2pyplv3GEeaZtJ5hOv6wnw) It\'s disgusting that WaPo headlines are often Buzzfeed-worthy.', '>>{MWM2} : You might want to consult a map. India is not located in the United States.', ">>{MrSparks4} : Anti racism marches for Emmit Till? A soldier goes to war as a choice to protect their country, some soldiers are anti war, protesting with an anti way sentiment makes little sense. Abortion is a choice and death is an accident, not the intent. Gay marriage doesn't cause AIDS or death from AIDS, unprotected sex spreads AIDS. That Indian man was minding his own business when he was gunned down by a racist prick. He didn't chose to be shot.", '>>{Amrokmfc} : He is a handsome man, isn\'t he? I feel that Canada is leading the "Handsomest/Prettiest Leader" contest by a lot. Though there is that King and his wife...', '>>{chainersedict} : >Before the cremation, the family washed and prepared the body of Srinivas Kuchibhotla, 32, outside their home in a gated community near Hyderabad called Bachupally. The victim’s wife, Sunayana Dumala, and his mother wept, and the older woman had to be revived after fainting.', ">>{mkm18} : Maybe, but it's too vague a concept to be encoded in law either way anyway", ">>{19djafoij02} : 5) This is a case study in how ethnic hate and radicalism begin. Indian Hindus haven't generally struggled with extremism and violent anti-Americanism for most of their history. A few American idiots with guns open fire or yell slurs at Hindus, perhaps mistaking then for Muslims (who have been experiencing a wave of violent extremism for the past 30-40 years) and the recognized, elected US government does little to condemn them. As a result, Indian Hindus become more angry and more susceptible to anti-American rhetoric. You're seeing the beginnings of a cycle of hatred here and both countries need to act to stop it.", '>>{goody_heggety} : When a racist white-nationalist killed the person, yes.', ">>{goody_heggety} : The agenda of Indians not getting murdered in the US because they're brown?", '>>{goody_heggety} : Considering it was their family member who got murdered by a racist bigot, they can put up any damn signs they want.', ">>{goody_heggety} : Trump has encouraged and enabled these people. They think it's just fine to do this now, including murder.", '>>{Matasa89} : The parents put all of their effort into raising their boy, and he ended up a successful and beloved Garmin engineer... only to be killed in cold blood by some unwashed redneck that was screaming xenophobia. They need to be on suicide watch... for the rest of their lives.', ">>{Slampumpthejam} : Ya all his family and friends should suck it up and pretend they don't mind him being murdered in cold-blood by an ignorant bigot", '>>{mannabhai} : In India, funerals have always been used to grandstand politics.'], [">>{Nashvillain2} : This philosopher predicted Trump's rise in 1998 — and he has another warning for the left: Why Richard Rorty’s critique of the left is as relevant as ever", '>>{ozric101} : Rorty also felt that Identity politics are cancer and all that matters any more are pragmatics.', '>>{OJSamson} : god i am so tired of those damn liberals fighting worker security, fighting to cut the minimum wage, and giving huge tax breaks to the rich. /s', '>>{noxylophone} : Actually, yes, those are the tenets of classical liberalism.', ">>{Lochmon} : With rapid advances in automation and AI white-collar jobs are as likely to disappear as blue-collar jobs. When you're unemployed with no good prospects it doesn't matter what color collar you used to wear.", '>>{threwmeawah} : Which is not the same thing as modern liberalism.. So not "actually"', '>>{OJSamson} : what that the poor are divorced from reality? that they see the left fighting 2 battles, for the welfare of the poor and the rights of the discriminated, and think they should vote for party that continuously blocks the left from helping the poor.', '>>{OJSamson} : > Which is not the same thing as liberalism Market Liberalism = Neoliberalism (Ronald Reagan) Social Liberalism= Modern Liberalism (Elizabeth Warren)', '>>{comeherebob} : I think both camps in the Democratic party (the "centrists" and the "berniecrats") will read this article and immediately see the faults of the opposing camp. IMO both sides need one another, badly. Neither on their own are good enough.', '>>{OJSamson} : > all while raising taxes. http://www.richardfitchen.com/tag/war-in-afghanistan/ sure looks divorced from reality to me', '>>{AtomicKoala} : Why is it unreasonable to raise fuel taxes while investing in public transport given climate change? Blue states have big public transport investment projects, do Texas or Florida even have a single metro system between them?', '>>{threwmeawah} : Yep. Also, I would add that some people argue that conservatives are adherents of classical liberalism. I just wanted to point out that liberalism and liberals without a qualifier generally refers to social (or modern) liberalism. At least in the US.', ">>{AtomicKoala} : Modern liberalism as espoused by say, D66 or moderate Democrats isn't far off classical liberalism. It's a case of adapting to the times. But liberals have always been pro trade for example.", '>>{OJSamson} : and blue states are the states doing the best while red states have been cutting taxes, cutting welfare, taking in more federal funds, and have been doing worse overall.', '>>{threwmeawah} : Conservatives are closer to classical liberalism than Democrats. But yes, there are some shared beliefs', ">>{AtomicKoala} : Conservatives in Europe maybe. Conservativism in America is dead. It's been squeezed between the centre to centre right moderate Democrat and the increasingly radicalised reactionaries of the GOP.", '>>{threwmeawah} : This is why I chose to say Conservatives instead of Republicans. There is no shortage of people claiming to be "conservatives," but this election and this presidency have shown there aren\'t many actual Conservatives', ">>{AtomicKoala} : What's happening in the US is almost a regression back to the mid to late 19th century, when conservatives were opposed to free market capitalism, instead fighting pro-capitalism, pro-trade liberals to try to protect the vestiges of feudalism. Someone more knowledgeable than me should do a write up. In Europe the far right arose with little backing from the moneyed aristocracy. In the US, the GOP already had that backing, the far right simply took over the party, creating that parallel.", ">>{Suitcase_Johnson} : Oh no! Things are getting out of control! Quick, now we need to give a few scraps the proles before they outright revolt! ... We're only votes to them. A reasource to be exploited and controlled. This is the flaw of representative democracy. The genie is out of the bottle now anyway. Fascism is here, fight or be crushed.", ">>{subsonic87} : Fantastic article, despite the clickbaity headline. Examines the divisiveness of identity politics, while also acknowledging that they were necessary (and reduced society's barbarism).", '>>{subsonic87} : Not quite true, at least according to the Vox article: > Rorty’s concern was not that the left cared too much about race relations or discrimination (it should care about these things); rather, he warned that it stopped doing the hard work of liberal democratic politics. He worried that it’s retreat into academia, into theory and away from the concrete, would prove politically disastrous.', ">>{data2dave} : Seems though the writer endorsed Sander's wing at the end of article. The Centrists need to stop sucking Wall Street's nipple and join with the Progressive wing of party.", ">>{malpais} : >IMO both sides need one another, badly. Neither on their own are good enough. That is how I read it. And I think it's how it was intended.", '>>{atnorman} : Vox really misrepresented Rorty. But Rorty was also nutty, so w/e.', ">>{comeherebob} : I think you’ve missed the point of the article. Your comment here is basically saying, “Abandon all your deeply held convictions and side with progressives.” Why? Because the US is such a left-wing country? No, they’re not – Americans skew much more conservative than other Western countries, which is probably why left-wing progressives like Teachout won even fewer votes than Clinton did. I *know* that a lot of Americans are a little more fiscally conservative than the progressives and see the protectionist stances as dangerous – I know because I am one! That doesn’t mean I don’t root for Bernie or Warren when they’re on the floor, it just means I don’t agree with them 100% of the time. But totally abandoning what I think is right and moving drastically to the left would be 1) giving up on my own convictions, which I thought Sanders warned against, and 2) not even a winning strategy! What the Sanders wing should be teaching centrists is how to realign their message as one that resonates with the working class. This doesn’t mean we all need to move left, it means we need to focus on showing blue-collar workers how the Democrats actually *are* working in their best interest (including globalisation). We need to go back to being a big tent party who still has room for the Manchins, who wouldn’t be able to hold onto their seats in West Virginia if they went full Sanders (and shouldn’t *have* to, just because a few progressives think that he's impure for not living up to every one of their standards). That means leaving purity tests at the door and being willing to work with people who don’t agree with you on every single issue ever.", ">>{bexmex} : Wages declined because REPUBLICANS passed right-to-work laws, slashed education, blocked minimum wage increases, blocked Obama's jobs bills, and blocked Obama's job retraining. And yes, that stuff costs money, so liberals support tax hikes ON THE RICH to pay for it all. If you think people will fall for your obvious lies backed up with ZERO evidence, you're on the wrong sub.", '>>{noxylophone} : Also tenets of neoliberalism, which you may have heard of.', '>>{noxylophone} : Both parties largely hew to classical liberal economic ideas, hence the term "neoliberal."', ">>{bexmex} : This is in no way, shape, or form anything new. They've been saying it since the 1930s. Governments typically work for the rich and powerful, they only work for the little guy when we force them to. Capitalism, automation, and globalization *if done right* can make everybody's lives better. But there's also a good chance that wages will stagnate or even go backwards for the middle class if its done wrong... which is what we are seeing now. At which point, liberals will cling to SOCIALISM as the cure, and conservatives will cling to FASCISM as the cure. What we're seeing in America is exactly what happened in Europe a dozen times in the past 100 years. If the powers that be cant make government work for the people again, SOMEBODY is gonna smash the whole things to the ground. Trump wont succeed because he's so inept... but the next person probably would. Whether the next person is a socialist or a competent fascist is up for debate...", ">>{threwmeawah} : I don't get your point. He obviously was referring to social liberals (sarcastically), not neoliberals and definitely not classical liberals. Social liberals are diametrically opposed to all the policies he listed, hence the /s Is your point that classical liberalism and neoliberalism are bad? Ok, most people on this sub probably agree that most of their ideas are bad, bar free trade agreements which would have a more split opinion.", ">>{data2dave} : I agree mostly as long as we don't go Republican-lite as Carter did, or Clinton did in his second term. Obama? Mostly the same but Republicans never would compromise with him, no matter when he tried."]]

classify and reply

[">>{Ree81} : TL;DL on how well they're secured in ears?", ">>{arandombusinessowner} : Asus leaks are the worst! To remove the USB type C fluid from your clothing it's best to make a paste of peroxide and baking soda and rub a samsung battery on it.", '>>{basedOp} : The Green Party’s Jill Stein Wants a Green New Deal', ">>{SacredFig} : Clicked the link, immediately two autoplay videos. Checked the website, oh it's CNET. We should really ban this website. Shitty reviews and annoying website layouts.", ">>{agenthondo} : Foldable phone... So we're going back to flip phones then?", '>>{progresstogether} : There will be green jobs wiht Secretary Clinton. With Jill Stein, you get far-left fringe ideas about how to run a country, treasonous butt-kissing of rapists and traitors like Julian Assange, and a side order of anti-vaxxerism and healing crystals. America will tell Jill Stein a loud NO THANKS on election day.', '>>{Arhowk} : Not sure how you got out of /r/subredditsimulator', ">>{IbanezDavy} : > traitors like Julian Assange How is Assange a traitor? He's not even a US citizen. I didn't realize Australians had a sworn fealty to the United States.", '>>{Chewwaka} : I think we have already told her no thanks judging by her poll numbers.', ">>{nullCaput} : I'd buy a touch phone/device like the ones in Westworld in a heartbeat. And I wouldn't be surprised if engineers at companies like Apple/Google/Microsoft saw the show and started working on prototype phone devices in the vein of them.", '>>{Wfdeacon88} : No good seal I assume... Aka shitty sound. My buds from sol republic are so good. Sound awesome.. and a great seal making them work on airplanes, etc.', '>>{VeryGoodGoodGood} : From the picture it appears to feature the USB-C, but does not solely rely on it. introducing new technology on Computers is great, and this way legacy tech can still be utilized without adaptors like the macbooks. This is the way apple should have done it.', '>>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : Unfortunately, those jobs will be in India and China.', ">>{autobulb} : There's only 1 port on the left side in the photo. The other port is likely on the other side.", '>>{frbap} : I am so sick of the adaptors. The apple pencil looks stupid when plugged in and could get damaged. "Oh, you\'re doing it wrong. You need the adaptor so it doesn\'t stick out." There\'s very few USB-C to Lightning cables. How am I supposed to use iTunes on my Mac or PC? "Who uses computers anymore? Besides, you can get an adaptor." I have these headphones, how am I supposed t -- "Adaptor." What about HDMI, how am I "AD. APT. OR."', ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : She's not anti-vax. For the millionth time, stop with the lies.", ">>{Solidarieta} : >How can you have a democracy, if you're just voting against who you're most afraid of? Great interview.", '>>{loki8481} : she also wants to guarantee a 100% employment rate, a maximum 30 hour work-week, and pull out of NATO.', ">>{AristotleTheYounger} : Really don't understand the point of a foldable phone, though I'll buy it anyways cuz I'm a fucking sheep.", ">>{frbap} : I don't like Asus very much, but I've heard their other chromebook works pretty well if you like putting linux on them. If I didn't need something that could handle rendering and photoshop, I would consider one.", ">>{Jill_Stein_For_Pres} : Jill fights for *real* progressives. She's dedicated her life to championing our causes and raising our concerns. Unlike another female candidate currently running who is nothing more than a moderate Republican who masquerades as a progressive whenever she has an election to win. Jill is the lionhearted champion and booming voice of a new generation of grassroots progressives ready to take up Bernie's fight and stand in defiance of the corporate oligarchs and establishment politicians of this nation who seek to churn the American worker and the ambitious student in to the millstone of history in the name of maximized profits and a devastated climate. She seeks to end wars, not to escalate them. She seeks to ease student loan burdens, not encumber students with more debt. She seeks to combat climate change with a *real*, substantive push towards a green energy economy. She seeks to empower our struggling middle and lower classes with a firm push for a $15 an hour minimum wage. She's the stoic progressive stalwart America needs as its leader now. Her fight is our fight and our fight is *her* fight.", ">>{TheHeliosNebula} : Samsung has foldable screen tech so they're probably on it", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : > those jobs will be in India and China. Only if we allow the owner to move them', ">>{agenthondo} : *braces for impact* I haven't seen Westworld, so I don't know what you're talking about.", ">>{nullCaput} : Well, you should probably get on it, it's a fantastic show! You got the whole season to binge on now if you want.", ">>{fizzlemcdizzle} : Hopefully they refresh the flip variant and make Andromeda work out, with Android apps it's a dream tablet IMO. Crossover", ">>{____really____} : Didn't she say that the process for regulating and approving vaccines was corrupt and full of lobbyists? Yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and continue calling her anti-vax. She is trying to play footsie with the anti-vaxxers instead of denouncing them as dangerous and irrational. So her anti-vax reputation is not only truthful, but well earned.", ">>{rtv190} : I'm surprised we are just now getting USB-C powered Chromebooks, since unlike a Macbook Pro or a normal Windows laptop you aren't going to be doing any heavy productivity or gaming on them so extra ports are pretty unnecessary unless you are running Linux or sideloading Android apps onto it.", '>>{AuroraHalsey} : Well, the current iPhones are already foldable, they just lose some functionality afterwards.', ">>{loki8481} : > She's dedicated her life to championing our causes and raising our concerns. so why hasn't she ever gotten involved with trying to work from within the government? her only experience actually serving the people from a government position was on the town council of a small suburb.", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : >She is trying to play footsie with the anti-vaxxers instead of denouncing them as dangerous and irrational. You'll get an agreement with me on this matter. She is definitely tiptoeing around the issue to shore up anti-vax voters. Secondly, her understanding of how vaccinations are handled administratively is naive. But I stand by my point: she's not anti-vax. She's merely naive.", '>>{AresX85} : Same way as EarPods, but the lack of wires makes all the difference. He shows some third party wires he had that connect the two and said those kept making them fall out, but with nothing attached he had no problems with them staying in basically.', '>>{basedmattnigga7} : These will still hurt my ears, so why bother?', ">>{I_Hate_Nerds} : > Jill fights for real progressives I'm a real progressive and Stein can shove it. She's terribly naive about many issues to the point of being absurd and she's never held any significant elected office in her life, no executive experience, how could such a woefully unexperienced and unprepared person lead the most powerful nation in the history of man? She has no business running for president, period. She's a left wing demagogue trying to ride Bernie's coattails when she's about qualified enough to be his intern. She should try getting elected to her local school board first if she wants to play government.", ">>{I_Hate_Nerds} : She's not anti-vax like Trump isn't racist. Trump openly disavows David Duke and the support of the klan and white nationalists while dog whistling to them all the same.", ">>{royalstaircase} : Holy cow yes, if foldable phones came back I'd be so happy. My iphone's screen cracks from a 6-inch drop but my Nintendo DS survived both WWII atomic bombs without a scratch. I'm sick of smartphones being these delicate little origami flowers that have to be protected from the lightest of damage.", ">>{Hailtothething} : 5 episodes in, still can't tell if there is a main character", '>>{F22Rapture} : And destroy all US nuclear weapons without a bilateral disarmament treaty with Russia.', '>>{TheHeliosNebula} : You said but why. What are you referring to?', ">>{TheHeliosNebula} : Folding screen I one, what's the second technology?", ">>{D0tHack3r} : I'm an ASUS repaired can confirm I will receive a call from a customer tell me the product is bad and they won't buy from asus again as if I build the damn thing", ">>{Chair_Toaster} : Doing it this way makes progression longer. Apple wants the industry to hurry up and adopt this new standard. Not drag it's feet for years.", ">>{Chair_Toaster} : It's a good thing the pencil only takes a few seconds to charge. It's the best option to charge it and not cable needed.", '>>{golikehellmachine} : Setting aside her bullshit false equivalence between Trump and Clinton, her "plan" for a "Green New Deal" isn\'t a plan at all - it\'s an idea, and it\'s not an especially well thought out idea, at that. Much of what she\'s advocating for are state-level policies; local food networks (whatever that means), public transportation, etc., are **all** state issues, not federal issues. For a President Jill Stein\'s Green New Deal to work, she\'d have to accomplish the following: -Identify Democratic Senators willing to write, sponsor, and whip legislation through the Senate (Note: let\'s also remember that this won\'t be a single piece of legislation, just like the New Deal wasn\'t. It\'ll have to be dozens of pieces of legislation that will have to be tightly coordinated in order to accomplish these very ambitious goals.) -Pass all of that legislation with a filibuster-proof majority, which is going to require every Democrat, Independent, and a few Republicans -Get that legislation through the House, which is going to remain in Republican control through at least 2018 -Ensure that the legislation that does get through Congress is rock-solid and can survive hundreds of inevitable lower-court challenges, particularly on issues of state vs federal rights Essentially, what Stein\'s promising is that she, and she alone, with a current base of Congressional support that\'s roughly equal to zero, will be able to unite Congressional Democrats, Independents and Republicans to pass the most ambitious, complex, and comprehensive legislative agenda in more than fifty years, and do so in a way that can survive court challenges at every level of the judicial system, *while simultaneously* managing every other responsibility the President of the United States has, despite having no real experience running any type of large organization and very little experience (and responsibility) as an elected official. Forgive me if I\'m a little skeptical. Particularly when it comes to policy, an "idea" isn\'t worth the paper it\'s printed on if you don\'t have any plan for how to make it happen.', '>>{Ree81} : Once a day I read one of their posts and briefly but consistently become completely confused.', '>>{WesternPhilosophy} : And like Clinton isn\'t corrupt? And be careful for thinking you\'re above the fray. What did Clinton say on the autism connection in 2008, when the rest of us knew that it was all a hoax? >"I am committed to make investments to find the causes of autism, including possible environmental causes like vaccines…We don\'t know what, if any, kind of link there is between vaccines and autism - but we should find out." Consistency seems to be wherever the wind is blowing.', '>>{Ree81} : > HDMI "Just wait until TVs have a USB-C port, duh!" ......Or more likely, do stuff wirelessly. Chromecast is a thing.', ">>{golikehellmachine} : > Jill fights for real progressives. She's dedicated her life to championing our causes and raising our concerns. And what has she accomplished? She's been the nominal head of the Green Party for at least four years, during which, the Green Party has been stagnant. The Green Party, in it's entire history, has *never once* managed to get a single person elected to federal office. Not once. Even if you agree with Jill Stein on policy, and even if you support the Green Party, you should at least spend a little bit of time evaluating the results of their efforts. Under Jill Stein, the Green Party has made no gains, they've garnered no significant achievements, and they've had no appreciable impact on public policy. When you're asking me to support Jill Stein, I need you to explain to me why I should. It's not enough just to have your heart in the right place, particularly in politics. You need to demonstrate to me that you are capable of doing the job, and the best way to make that determination is to evaluate your history. Stein does not have a history which would indicate that she would be a competent executive. Could she? I don't know; perhaps she should run for mayor or governor, win, and we can find out. But I'm not putting her into arguably the most important job on the entire fucking planet just to see if she can do it.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : Naiveté would imply that Stein just doesn't know what she's saying, or how it could be perceived. I don't think very highly of Stein, but even *I* don't think she's that dim. No, she knows exactly what she's doing.", ">>{DarKbaldness} : I've never had a problem with the Apple Pencil and it charges so fast you would have to deliberately break it.", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : If it's about the election, how do you not?", '>>{WesternPhilosophy} : No. She definitely is naive for wanting to put Snowden in her cabinet. I think her character is carrying over to other political subjects. Weighing the evidence, carelessness makes more sense than cold deliberation.', ">>{golikehellmachine} : Oh, I was just speaking to her comments on vaccinations, which I think are very much the product of cold deliberation. She's aggressively fucking naive and willfully clueless on a whole variety of other issues, though.", '>>{JP2214} : Different uses for different needs and preferences man. Not everyone is a port happy power user. You are putting words in peoples\' mouths with that adaptor rant. Personally I... don\'t use ports that much at all anymore, and I know plenty of users like myself. This doesn\'t make me any less of a "power" user, it\'s just that I have different needs.', '>>{JP2214} : Wireless is one of the ideal futures. Although USB-Cs replacing ports on displays sounds awesome as well.', ">>{JP2214} : They may say so, and it might have a similar effect, but I'm fine with a USB-C only device with gradual slower tech adaption as well.", ">>{JP2214} : Recently I've been wondering... does heavy gaming or productivity require more ports? I'm starting to think that it isn't the case these days.", ">>{Jeeterhawk007} : Just as I suspected. Asus' claims about this laptop don't hold water.", '>>{bertdom} : Why would they include a microSD card slot but not a USB 3.0 port?', ">>{Jill_Stein_For_Pres} : > I'm a real progressive Real progressives are anti-war. As such, they don't willingly cast ballots for candidates whose pro-war interventionist foreign policies will result in the deaths and continued suffering of thousands of innocent middle eastern men, women, and children.", ">>{I_Hate_Nerds} : > Real progressives are anti-war. No we're not. If the the US sat out WW2 you'd be typing out this shitpost in German.", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : I smell lip service (which is a less potent kind of bad, though still being bad), but considering the Green Party Platform formerly contained anti-vax language, I can certainly recognize and understand the skepticism. Clinton has questioned the usefulness of vaccines before; this is something that Stein has not shown to be true in her background (aside from some careful pandering--wrong on her, but the crime is less severe). To conclude, let's be fair. I suppose others are worth a second glance? (Edit: I'm not voting for Stein. I simply think that she is not deliberately trying to push an anti-vax agenda.)", '>>{Lalzballzz} : There are tons of USB-C to lightning cables wtf are you even talking about. Almost all the stuff you said is you going out of your way to find issues with everything.', ">>{sourbrew} : Yeah I believe you're a real progressive about as much as I believe Clinton is one, which is to say not at all.", '>>{sourbrew} : Uhhh yes we most certainly are, and none of the conflicts we are currently involved in championed by Hillary Clinton have anything like the moral necessity of WWII.', ">>{golikehellmachine} : I can totally agree that she's not pushing an anti-vax agenda; she's soft-peddling it because the Green Party have a sizable contingent of anti-science nutters that they can't afford to lose. And fair enough! That's politics! What gets my hackles up about Stein is that she pretends to be above that kind of fray, when it's obvious that she's willing to wallow in it when she needs to. This irritated the shit out of me about Sanders, too, and he was better on this front than Stein is (or at least better at it).", ">>{ByteCurious} : I'm sorry, didn't Apple JUST release a phone that still uses lightning, with no option for USB C? This just seems weird to me, I'd love to have just one charger for everything (I pretty much live out of my backpack), but I don't see us getting there anytime soon.", '>>{druuconian} : So just real common sense, down to earth, feasible stuff.', ">>{AgoraiosBum} : So the candidate with no chance has an agenda unmoored from reality? quelle surprise... Although you did yeoman's work by actually wading through it all.", '>>{ByteCurious} : I hope so, not because I want another iPhone, but because I want USB C to become industry standard for everything.', ">>{DEATH_GRAPE} : This just might be nice enough to get as a gift for my wife's son, he loves surfing the web and he needs a new PC, keeps getting viruses on his old one, downloading too many scholarly articles I presume (African studies major)", ">>{druuconian} : > -Identify Democratic Senators willing to write, sponsor, and whip legislation through the Senate (Note: let's also remember that this won't be a single piece of legislation, just like the New Deal wasn't. It'll have to be dozens of pieces of legislation that will have to be tightly coordinated in order to accomplish these very ambitious goals.) > -Pass all of that legislation with a filibuster-proof majority, which is going to require every Democrat, Independent, and a few Republicans > -Get that legislation through the House, which is going to remain in Republican control through at least 2018 > -Ensure that the legislation that does get through Congress is rock-solid and can survive hundreds of inevitable lower-court challenges, particularly on issues of state vs federal rights But who needs that when you've got a *revolution.*", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : > she's soft-peddling Fair enough; the Green Party has massive problems with anti-science. >What gets my hackles up about Stein is that she pretends to be above that kind of fray, when it's obvious that she's willing to wallow in it when she needs to. This applies to people who frequently shift on positions. Yes, you can change your mind, but why does it always blow in the winds of popular opinion? The lack of reflection from the Clinton crowd is tragic. But I'm only willing to defend someone I won't vote for so much. I'm already voting for Clinton because Drumpf will be a nightmare. And fuck Mike Pence.", ">>{HTownian25} : She'll have a huge Congressional majority behind her, so the sky will be the limit.", ">>{Cuddlyaxe} : Don't get me wrong, I dislike Stein, I think she's a loon and all her policies are stupid. But what's wrong with idealism? Ofc reality won't be that good, but she's laying out a fairly broad list of things she'd try to do in her presidency", ">>{Jill_Stein_For_Pres} : Germany was already suffering massive casualties before the United States even entered the war. The Russians did the bulk of the work and have the casualty numbers to prove it. As for me speaking German, I must have missed that part of history class where Germany invaded the United States. Have fun washing the blood off your hands from voting Clinton in November, though. I'm sure all of the innocents who will die as a result of her aggressive foreign policy are happy to give their lives so that you can vote for the person who will exterminate them.", '>>{Cuddlyaxe} : As well as *Banning GMOs *Banning wifi until "further research is done" *Get rid of clean and sustainable nuclear energy *Pull out of NATO *100% employment *30 hour work weeks *Destroy all US nukes... Without bilateral agreements w/ Russia *Pro Homeopathy(?) *Real* progressivism sure is nice', ">>{golikehellmachine} : There's nothing wrong with idealism on it's own, but there's a sizable difference between idealism and blind optimism. Further, I think one of my big problems with Stein is that she appears not to actually understand the limitations of executive power, or, more worringly, doesn't care about them. Optimism's great! But if you're applying for the most important job in the world, you'd better have some kind of a plan for putting that optimism into action. Thus far, Stein's shown no sign of this - and, more importantly, doesn't seem to care. Her entire campaign is an attention ploy, and she very, very clearly doesn't have any idea of how she would govern if she *did* win. In that regard, she's no better than Trump.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : > Although you did yeoman's work by actually wading through it all. I get tired of being accused (by Stein's supporters) of not taking her seriously, or misrepresenting her. I take her very seriously as a Presidential candidate, which is why I'm unabashedly critical of her and her supporters. Stein supporters: I'm taking your candidate seriously. It's a shame you don't.", '>>{I_Hate_Nerds} : Well this is the naivete of the Green Party the "anti-war" crowd. Despite what the news and the political candidates tell you the world is currently in the safest, most peaceful, most prosperous era in the history of all mankind. That is not hyperbole. This era has been ushered in partly by globalism and partly (to be modest) by US Global Preeminence. You wonder why the US spends more on the Military then almost the rest of the world combined? You wonder why "none of the conflicts we are currently involved in...[is]... like the moral necessity of WWII"? Well this is why. Our might, military, and geopolitical power have led to a dramatic *reduction* in war, death and destruction (even including George W Bush\'s stupid war of aggression). The conflicts the world is engaged in are smaller, non-global, far less deadly and far less destructive because of the power we wield over the world. **US Global Preeminence must be maintained because it is the single most powerful force for good, peace and prosperity mankind has ever seen**. Iraq (again extremely stupid and unnecessary), Libya, Syria, etc are unfortunate and we must do everything we can to prevent unnecessarily war, death and destruction - sometimes we get it wrong. But it is a small price to pay to maintain US Global Preeminence. Which again, and it cannot be overstated, is the single most powerful force for good, peace and prosperity mankind has ever seen. The ultimate goal of course is no war - but we are not naive - for now sometimes it must be maintained with war, but it is 100fold better than the alternative. So you are being very naive when you say so-and-so is "pro war" when they are in fact striving to maintain US Global Preeminence - which has been the most effective anti-war force in the history of mankind. Sorry the number is not 0 yet but this is hard work you know. https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-ca57e04510785849e15f25ebac070cf3-c?convert_to_webp=true https://ourworldindata.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ourworldindata_wars-long-run-military-civilian-fatalities-from-brecke1.png https://ourworldindata.org/VisualHistoryOf/Violence/StaticImages/Number-of-World-Citizens-living-under-different-political-systems_Max-Roser.png', '>>{golikehellmachine} : Not really. The interviewer basically just lets Stein run, without asking any critical questions or challenging her on some of her more ridiculous assumptions.', '>>{sourbrew} : Where did I say the world was unsecure at the moment? Trying very hard to fit me into your talking points narrative. I just disagree that there is a moral imperative that we be bombing 7 disparate nations, one of which, Syria, is directly contributing to a rising cold war with Russia that the Democratic party leadership seems determined to embrace as a means of shifting blame from their own failings. You tried to use WWII as a straw man, I simply disagreed that they were comparable. I have no problem with military action when it is humane, a moral necessity, and promotes our own interests. Clearly the creation of ISIS through our bombing campaigns was none of those things.', '>>{I_Hate_Nerds} : > I have no problem with military action when it is humane, a moral necessity, and promotes our own interests. Then you\'re not anti-war now are you? If I\'m "anti-racism" that doesn\'t mean I can be racist only when they really deserve it. Just like I can\'t be "anti-war" but then go to war when someone really deserves it. Being "anti-war" doesn\'t necessarily mean "pro-peace". The WW2 example illustrates this perfectly, if the US did not enter WW2 and Hitler was allowed to win - do you think he would have stopped there? Wouldn\'t that have led to even greater war, death and destruction? Of course. If France and Britain had kept their promise and went to "war" with Hitler the moment he broke the treaty of Versailles (long before he invaded Poland) 50-80 million lives could have been saved. Now would the "anti-war" crowd condone that? Just for someone breaking a little rule on some treaty? Or would you have dithered like France and Britain leading to 50-80 million dead? You don\'t understand what "anti-war" even means.', ">>{sourbrew} : From strawman to strawman. You're not even remotely arguing in good faith while also pretending to be something you're not, we're done here. Have a nice day.", '>>{I_Hate_Nerds} : Again people on reddit having no clue what the term "strawman" means. So I guess I will need to spell it out. Because if France and Britain had went to "war" with Germany the moment Hitler broke the Treaty of Versailles instead of dithering until he invaded Poland - they would have saved 50-80 million lives. And what would they get for their efforts? People like you and the "anti-war" crowd would be calling them war mongers because it wasn\'t "absolutely necessary" wasn\'t "war as a last resort". Starting to sink in a bit? Waiting to start WW2 "as a last resort" left 50-80 million dead.', '>>{Positive_pressure} : > And destroy all US nuclear weapons without a bilateral disarmament treaty with Russia. Why do you have to lie? Stein proposes to cut spending on development of [*new* nuclear weapons](http://www.jill2016.com/on_tax_day_stein_calls_for_massive_miliatary_cut). In what world is it considered a disarmament?', ">>{misella_landica} : What're you, some sort of pinko terrorist? Clearly every human being has the duty to swear fealty to Americas Dear Leaders", '>>{IbanezDavy} : Also we could literally have just 1000 nukes and still pose the same level of threat. In fact we only really need less than 100.', '>>{IbanezDavy} : If they want stuff passed. Yes. She has to sign them bills.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{arandombusinessowner} : Asus leaks are the worst! To remove the USB type C fluid from your clothing it's best to make a paste of peroxide and baking soda and rub a samsung battery on it.", '>>{Arhowk} : Not sure how you got out of /r/subredditsimulator', '>>{VeryGoodGoodGood} : From the picture it appears to feature the USB-C, but does not solely rely on it. introducing new technology on Computers is great, and this way legacy tech can still be utilized without adaptors like the macbooks. This is the way apple should have done it.', ">>{autobulb} : There's only 1 port on the left side in the photo. The other port is likely on the other side.", '>>{frbap} : I am so sick of the adaptors. The apple pencil looks stupid when plugged in and could get damaged. "Oh, you\'re doing it wrong. You need the adaptor so it doesn\'t stick out." There\'s very few USB-C to Lightning cables. How am I supposed to use iTunes on my Mac or PC? "Who uses computers anymore? Besides, you can get an adaptor." I have these headphones, how am I supposed t -- "Adaptor." What about HDMI, how am I "AD. APT. OR."', ">>{frbap} : I don't like Asus very much, but I've heard their other chromebook works pretty well if you like putting linux on them. If I didn't need something that could handle rendering and photoshop, I would consider one.", ">>{fizzlemcdizzle} : Hopefully they refresh the flip variant and make Andromeda work out, with Android apps it's a dream tablet IMO. Crossover", ">>{rtv190} : I'm surprised we are just now getting USB-C powered Chromebooks, since unlike a Macbook Pro or a normal Windows laptop you aren't going to be doing any heavy productivity or gaming on them so extra ports are pretty unnecessary unless you are running Linux or sideloading Android apps onto it.", ">>{D0tHack3r} : I'm an ASUS repaired can confirm I will receive a call from a customer tell me the product is bad and they won't buy from asus again as if I build the damn thing", ">>{Chair_Toaster} : Doing it this way makes progression longer. Apple wants the industry to hurry up and adopt this new standard. Not drag it's feet for years.", ">>{Chair_Toaster} : It's a good thing the pencil only takes a few seconds to charge. It's the best option to charge it and not cable needed.", '>>{Ree81} : Once a day I read one of their posts and briefly but consistently become completely confused.', '>>{Ree81} : > HDMI "Just wait until TVs have a USB-C port, duh!" ......Or more likely, do stuff wirelessly. Chromecast is a thing.', ">>{DarKbaldness} : I've never had a problem with the Apple Pencil and it charges so fast you would have to deliberately break it.", '>>{JP2214} : Different uses for different needs and preferences man. Not everyone is a port happy power user. You are putting words in peoples\' mouths with that adaptor rant. Personally I... don\'t use ports that much at all anymore, and I know plenty of users like myself. This doesn\'t make me any less of a "power" user, it\'s just that I have different needs.', '>>{JP2214} : Wireless is one of the ideal futures. Although USB-Cs replacing ports on displays sounds awesome as well.', ">>{JP2214} : They may say so, and it might have a similar effect, but I'm fine with a USB-C only device with gradual slower tech adaption as well.", ">>{JP2214} : Recently I've been wondering... does heavy gaming or productivity require more ports? I'm starting to think that it isn't the case these days.", ">>{Jeeterhawk007} : Just as I suspected. Asus' claims about this laptop don't hold water.", '>>{bertdom} : Why would they include a microSD card slot but not a USB 3.0 port?', '>>{Lalzballzz} : There are tons of USB-C to lightning cables wtf are you even talking about. Almost all the stuff you said is you going out of your way to find issues with everything.', ">>{ByteCurious} : I'm sorry, didn't Apple JUST release a phone that still uses lightning, with no option for USB C? This just seems weird to me, I'd love to have just one charger for everything (I pretty much live out of my backpack), but I don't see us getting there anytime soon.", '>>{ByteCurious} : I hope so, not because I want another iPhone, but because I want USB C to become industry standard for everything.', ">>{DEATH_GRAPE} : This just might be nice enough to get as a gift for my wife's son, he loves surfing the web and he needs a new PC, keeps getting viruses on his old one, downloading too many scholarly articles I presume (African studies major)"], [">>{Ree81} : TL;DL on how well they're secured in ears?", ">>{SacredFig} : Clicked the link, immediately two autoplay videos. Checked the website, oh it's CNET. We should really ban this website. Shitty reviews and annoying website layouts.", ">>{agenthondo} : Foldable phone... So we're going back to flip phones then?", ">>{nullCaput} : I'd buy a touch phone/device like the ones in Westworld in a heartbeat. And I wouldn't be surprised if engineers at companies like Apple/Google/Microsoft saw the show and started working on prototype phone devices in the vein of them.", '>>{Wfdeacon88} : No good seal I assume... Aka shitty sound. My buds from sol republic are so good. Sound awesome.. and a great seal making them work on airplanes, etc.', ">>{AristotleTheYounger} : Really don't understand the point of a foldable phone, though I'll buy it anyways cuz I'm a fucking sheep.", ">>{TheHeliosNebula} : Samsung has foldable screen tech so they're probably on it", ">>{agenthondo} : *braces for impact* I haven't seen Westworld, so I don't know what you're talking about.", ">>{nullCaput} : Well, you should probably get on it, it's a fantastic show! You got the whole season to binge on now if you want.", '>>{AuroraHalsey} : Well, the current iPhones are already foldable, they just lose some functionality afterwards.', '>>{AresX85} : Same way as EarPods, but the lack of wires makes all the difference. He shows some third party wires he had that connect the two and said those kept making them fall out, but with nothing attached he had no problems with them staying in basically.', '>>{basedmattnigga7} : These will still hurt my ears, so why bother?', ">>{royalstaircase} : Holy cow yes, if foldable phones came back I'd be so happy. My iphone's screen cracks from a 6-inch drop but my Nintendo DS survived both WWII atomic bombs without a scratch. I'm sick of smartphones being these delicate little origami flowers that have to be protected from the lightest of damage.", ">>{Hailtothething} : 5 episodes in, still can't tell if there is a main character", '>>{TheHeliosNebula} : You said but why. What are you referring to?', ">>{TheHeliosNebula} : Folding screen I one, what's the second technology?"], ['>>{basedOp} : The Green Party’s Jill Stein Wants a Green New Deal', '>>{progresstogether} : There will be green jobs wiht Secretary Clinton. With Jill Stein, you get far-left fringe ideas about how to run a country, treasonous butt-kissing of rapists and traitors like Julian Assange, and a side order of anti-vaxxerism and healing crystals. America will tell Jill Stein a loud NO THANKS on election day.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : > traitors like Julian Assange How is Assange a traitor? He's not even a US citizen. I didn't realize Australians had a sworn fealty to the United States.", '>>{Chewwaka} : I think we have already told her no thanks judging by her poll numbers.', '>>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : Unfortunately, those jobs will be in India and China.', ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : She's not anti-vax. For the millionth time, stop with the lies.", ">>{Solidarieta} : >How can you have a democracy, if you're just voting against who you're most afraid of? Great interview.", '>>{loki8481} : she also wants to guarantee a 100% employment rate, a maximum 30 hour work-week, and pull out of NATO.', ">>{Jill_Stein_For_Pres} : Jill fights for *real* progressives. She's dedicated her life to championing our causes and raising our concerns. Unlike another female candidate currently running who is nothing more than a moderate Republican who masquerades as a progressive whenever she has an election to win. Jill is the lionhearted champion and booming voice of a new generation of grassroots progressives ready to take up Bernie's fight and stand in defiance of the corporate oligarchs and establishment politicians of this nation who seek to churn the American worker and the ambitious student in to the millstone of history in the name of maximized profits and a devastated climate. She seeks to end wars, not to escalate them. She seeks to ease student loan burdens, not encumber students with more debt. She seeks to combat climate change with a *real*, substantive push towards a green energy economy. She seeks to empower our struggling middle and lower classes with a firm push for a $15 an hour minimum wage. She's the stoic progressive stalwart America needs as its leader now. Her fight is our fight and our fight is *her* fight.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : > those jobs will be in India and China. Only if we allow the owner to move them', ">>{____really____} : Didn't she say that the process for regulating and approving vaccines was corrupt and full of lobbyists? Yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and continue calling her anti-vax. She is trying to play footsie with the anti-vaxxers instead of denouncing them as dangerous and irrational. So her anti-vax reputation is not only truthful, but well earned.", ">>{loki8481} : > She's dedicated her life to championing our causes and raising our concerns. so why hasn't she ever gotten involved with trying to work from within the government? her only experience actually serving the people from a government position was on the town council of a small suburb.", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : >She is trying to play footsie with the anti-vaxxers instead of denouncing them as dangerous and irrational. You'll get an agreement with me on this matter. She is definitely tiptoeing around the issue to shore up anti-vax voters. Secondly, her understanding of how vaccinations are handled administratively is naive. But I stand by my point: she's not anti-vax. She's merely naive.", ">>{I_Hate_Nerds} : > Jill fights for real progressives I'm a real progressive and Stein can shove it. She's terribly naive about many issues to the point of being absurd and she's never held any significant elected office in her life, no executive experience, how could such a woefully unexperienced and unprepared person lead the most powerful nation in the history of man? She has no business running for president, period. She's a left wing demagogue trying to ride Bernie's coattails when she's about qualified enough to be his intern. She should try getting elected to her local school board first if she wants to play government.", ">>{I_Hate_Nerds} : She's not anti-vax like Trump isn't racist. Trump openly disavows David Duke and the support of the klan and white nationalists while dog whistling to them all the same.", '>>{F22Rapture} : And destroy all US nuclear weapons without a bilateral disarmament treaty with Russia.', '>>{golikehellmachine} : Setting aside her bullshit false equivalence between Trump and Clinton, her "plan" for a "Green New Deal" isn\'t a plan at all - it\'s an idea, and it\'s not an especially well thought out idea, at that. Much of what she\'s advocating for are state-level policies; local food networks (whatever that means), public transportation, etc., are **all** state issues, not federal issues. For a President Jill Stein\'s Green New Deal to work, she\'d have to accomplish the following: -Identify Democratic Senators willing to write, sponsor, and whip legislation through the Senate (Note: let\'s also remember that this won\'t be a single piece of legislation, just like the New Deal wasn\'t. It\'ll have to be dozens of pieces of legislation that will have to be tightly coordinated in order to accomplish these very ambitious goals.) -Pass all of that legislation with a filibuster-proof majority, which is going to require every Democrat, Independent, and a few Republicans -Get that legislation through the House, which is going to remain in Republican control through at least 2018 -Ensure that the legislation that does get through Congress is rock-solid and can survive hundreds of inevitable lower-court challenges, particularly on issues of state vs federal rights Essentially, what Stein\'s promising is that she, and she alone, with a current base of Congressional support that\'s roughly equal to zero, will be able to unite Congressional Democrats, Independents and Republicans to pass the most ambitious, complex, and comprehensive legislative agenda in more than fifty years, and do so in a way that can survive court challenges at every level of the judicial system, *while simultaneously* managing every other responsibility the President of the United States has, despite having no real experience running any type of large organization and very little experience (and responsibility) as an elected official. Forgive me if I\'m a little skeptical. Particularly when it comes to policy, an "idea" isn\'t worth the paper it\'s printed on if you don\'t have any plan for how to make it happen.', '>>{WesternPhilosophy} : And like Clinton isn\'t corrupt? And be careful for thinking you\'re above the fray. What did Clinton say on the autism connection in 2008, when the rest of us knew that it was all a hoax? >"I am committed to make investments to find the causes of autism, including possible environmental causes like vaccines…We don\'t know what, if any, kind of link there is between vaccines and autism - but we should find out." Consistency seems to be wherever the wind is blowing.', ">>{golikehellmachine} : > Jill fights for real progressives. She's dedicated her life to championing our causes and raising our concerns. And what has she accomplished? She's been the nominal head of the Green Party for at least four years, during which, the Green Party has been stagnant. The Green Party, in it's entire history, has *never once* managed to get a single person elected to federal office. Not once. Even if you agree with Jill Stein on policy, and even if you support the Green Party, you should at least spend a little bit of time evaluating the results of their efforts. Under Jill Stein, the Green Party has made no gains, they've garnered no significant achievements, and they've had no appreciable impact on public policy. When you're asking me to support Jill Stein, I need you to explain to me why I should. It's not enough just to have your heart in the right place, particularly in politics. You need to demonstrate to me that you are capable of doing the job, and the best way to make that determination is to evaluate your history. Stein does not have a history which would indicate that she would be a competent executive. Could she? I don't know; perhaps she should run for mayor or governor, win, and we can find out. But I'm not putting her into arguably the most important job on the entire fucking planet just to see if she can do it.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : Naiveté would imply that Stein just doesn't know what she's saying, or how it could be perceived. I don't think very highly of Stein, but even *I* don't think she's that dim. No, she knows exactly what she's doing.", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : If it's about the election, how do you not?", '>>{WesternPhilosophy} : No. She definitely is naive for wanting to put Snowden in her cabinet. I think her character is carrying over to other political subjects. Weighing the evidence, carelessness makes more sense than cold deliberation.', ">>{golikehellmachine} : Oh, I was just speaking to her comments on vaccinations, which I think are very much the product of cold deliberation. She's aggressively fucking naive and willfully clueless on a whole variety of other issues, though.", ">>{Jill_Stein_For_Pres} : > I'm a real progressive Real progressives are anti-war. As such, they don't willingly cast ballots for candidates whose pro-war interventionist foreign policies will result in the deaths and continued suffering of thousands of innocent middle eastern men, women, and children.", ">>{I_Hate_Nerds} : > Real progressives are anti-war. No we're not. If the the US sat out WW2 you'd be typing out this shitpost in German.", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : I smell lip service (which is a less potent kind of bad, though still being bad), but considering the Green Party Platform formerly contained anti-vax language, I can certainly recognize and understand the skepticism. Clinton has questioned the usefulness of vaccines before; this is something that Stein has not shown to be true in her background (aside from some careful pandering--wrong on her, but the crime is less severe). To conclude, let's be fair. I suppose others are worth a second glance? (Edit: I'm not voting for Stein. I simply think that she is not deliberately trying to push an anti-vax agenda.)", ">>{sourbrew} : Yeah I believe you're a real progressive about as much as I believe Clinton is one, which is to say not at all.", '>>{sourbrew} : Uhhh yes we most certainly are, and none of the conflicts we are currently involved in championed by Hillary Clinton have anything like the moral necessity of WWII.', ">>{golikehellmachine} : I can totally agree that she's not pushing an anti-vax agenda; she's soft-peddling it because the Green Party have a sizable contingent of anti-science nutters that they can't afford to lose. And fair enough! That's politics! What gets my hackles up about Stein is that she pretends to be above that kind of fray, when it's obvious that she's willing to wallow in it when she needs to. This irritated the shit out of me about Sanders, too, and he was better on this front than Stein is (or at least better at it).", '>>{druuconian} : So just real common sense, down to earth, feasible stuff.', ">>{AgoraiosBum} : So the candidate with no chance has an agenda unmoored from reality? quelle surprise... Although you did yeoman's work by actually wading through it all.", ">>{druuconian} : > -Identify Democratic Senators willing to write, sponsor, and whip legislation through the Senate (Note: let's also remember that this won't be a single piece of legislation, just like the New Deal wasn't. It'll have to be dozens of pieces of legislation that will have to be tightly coordinated in order to accomplish these very ambitious goals.) > -Pass all of that legislation with a filibuster-proof majority, which is going to require every Democrat, Independent, and a few Republicans > -Get that legislation through the House, which is going to remain in Republican control through at least 2018 > -Ensure that the legislation that does get through Congress is rock-solid and can survive hundreds of inevitable lower-court challenges, particularly on issues of state vs federal rights But who needs that when you've got a *revolution.*", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : > she's soft-peddling Fair enough; the Green Party has massive problems with anti-science. >What gets my hackles up about Stein is that she pretends to be above that kind of fray, when it's obvious that she's willing to wallow in it when she needs to. This applies to people who frequently shift on positions. Yes, you can change your mind, but why does it always blow in the winds of popular opinion? The lack of reflection from the Clinton crowd is tragic. But I'm only willing to defend someone I won't vote for so much. I'm already voting for Clinton because Drumpf will be a nightmare. And fuck Mike Pence.", ">>{HTownian25} : She'll have a huge Congressional majority behind her, so the sky will be the limit.", ">>{Cuddlyaxe} : Don't get me wrong, I dislike Stein, I think she's a loon and all her policies are stupid. But what's wrong with idealism? Ofc reality won't be that good, but she's laying out a fairly broad list of things she'd try to do in her presidency", ">>{Jill_Stein_For_Pres} : Germany was already suffering massive casualties before the United States even entered the war. The Russians did the bulk of the work and have the casualty numbers to prove it. As for me speaking German, I must have missed that part of history class where Germany invaded the United States. Have fun washing the blood off your hands from voting Clinton in November, though. I'm sure all of the innocents who will die as a result of her aggressive foreign policy are happy to give their lives so that you can vote for the person who will exterminate them.", '>>{Cuddlyaxe} : As well as *Banning GMOs *Banning wifi until "further research is done" *Get rid of clean and sustainable nuclear energy *Pull out of NATO *100% employment *30 hour work weeks *Destroy all US nukes... Without bilateral agreements w/ Russia *Pro Homeopathy(?) *Real* progressivism sure is nice', ">>{golikehellmachine} : There's nothing wrong with idealism on it's own, but there's a sizable difference between idealism and blind optimism. Further, I think one of my big problems with Stein is that she appears not to actually understand the limitations of executive power, or, more worringly, doesn't care about them. Optimism's great! But if you're applying for the most important job in the world, you'd better have some kind of a plan for putting that optimism into action. Thus far, Stein's shown no sign of this - and, more importantly, doesn't seem to care. Her entire campaign is an attention ploy, and she very, very clearly doesn't have any idea of how she would govern if she *did* win. In that regard, she's no better than Trump.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : > Although you did yeoman's work by actually wading through it all. I get tired of being accused (by Stein's supporters) of not taking her seriously, or misrepresenting her. I take her very seriously as a Presidential candidate, which is why I'm unabashedly critical of her and her supporters. Stein supporters: I'm taking your candidate seriously. It's a shame you don't.", '>>{I_Hate_Nerds} : Well this is the naivete of the Green Party the "anti-war" crowd. Despite what the news and the political candidates tell you the world is currently in the safest, most peaceful, most prosperous era in the history of all mankind. That is not hyperbole. This era has been ushered in partly by globalism and partly (to be modest) by US Global Preeminence. You wonder why the US spends more on the Military then almost the rest of the world combined? You wonder why "none of the conflicts we are currently involved in...[is]... like the moral necessity of WWII"? Well this is why. Our might, military, and geopolitical power have led to a dramatic *reduction* in war, death and destruction (even including George W Bush\'s stupid war of aggression). The conflicts the world is engaged in are smaller, non-global, far less deadly and far less destructive because of the power we wield over the world. **US Global Preeminence must be maintained because it is the single most powerful force for good, peace and prosperity mankind has ever seen**. Iraq (again extremely stupid and unnecessary), Libya, Syria, etc are unfortunate and we must do everything we can to prevent unnecessarily war, death and destruction - sometimes we get it wrong. But it is a small price to pay to maintain US Global Preeminence. Which again, and it cannot be overstated, is the single most powerful force for good, peace and prosperity mankind has ever seen. The ultimate goal of course is no war - but we are not naive - for now sometimes it must be maintained with war, but it is 100fold better than the alternative. So you are being very naive when you say so-and-so is "pro war" when they are in fact striving to maintain US Global Preeminence - which has been the most effective anti-war force in the history of mankind. Sorry the number is not 0 yet but this is hard work you know. https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-ca57e04510785849e15f25ebac070cf3-c?convert_to_webp=true https://ourworldindata.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ourworldindata_wars-long-run-military-civilian-fatalities-from-brecke1.png https://ourworldindata.org/VisualHistoryOf/Violence/StaticImages/Number-of-World-Citizens-living-under-different-political-systems_Max-Roser.png', '>>{golikehellmachine} : Not really. The interviewer basically just lets Stein run, without asking any critical questions or challenging her on some of her more ridiculous assumptions.', '>>{sourbrew} : Where did I say the world was unsecure at the moment? Trying very hard to fit me into your talking points narrative. I just disagree that there is a moral imperative that we be bombing 7 disparate nations, one of which, Syria, is directly contributing to a rising cold war with Russia that the Democratic party leadership seems determined to embrace as a means of shifting blame from their own failings. You tried to use WWII as a straw man, I simply disagreed that they were comparable. I have no problem with military action when it is humane, a moral necessity, and promotes our own interests. Clearly the creation of ISIS through our bombing campaigns was none of those things.', '>>{I_Hate_Nerds} : > I have no problem with military action when it is humane, a moral necessity, and promotes our own interests. Then you\'re not anti-war now are you? If I\'m "anti-racism" that doesn\'t mean I can be racist only when they really deserve it. Just like I can\'t be "anti-war" but then go to war when someone really deserves it. Being "anti-war" doesn\'t necessarily mean "pro-peace". The WW2 example illustrates this perfectly, if the US did not enter WW2 and Hitler was allowed to win - do you think he would have stopped there? Wouldn\'t that have led to even greater war, death and destruction? Of course. If France and Britain had kept their promise and went to "war" with Hitler the moment he broke the treaty of Versailles (long before he invaded Poland) 50-80 million lives could have been saved. Now would the "anti-war" crowd condone that? Just for someone breaking a little rule on some treaty? Or would you have dithered like France and Britain leading to 50-80 million dead? You don\'t understand what "anti-war" even means.', ">>{sourbrew} : From strawman to strawman. You're not even remotely arguing in good faith while also pretending to be something you're not, we're done here. Have a nice day.", '>>{I_Hate_Nerds} : Again people on reddit having no clue what the term "strawman" means. So I guess I will need to spell it out. Because if France and Britain had went to "war" with Germany the moment Hitler broke the Treaty of Versailles instead of dithering until he invaded Poland - they would have saved 50-80 million lives. And what would they get for their efforts? People like you and the "anti-war" crowd would be calling them war mongers because it wasn\'t "absolutely necessary" wasn\'t "war as a last resort". Starting to sink in a bit? Waiting to start WW2 "as a last resort" left 50-80 million dead.', '>>{Positive_pressure} : > And destroy all US nuclear weapons without a bilateral disarmament treaty with Russia. Why do you have to lie? Stein proposes to cut spending on development of [*new* nuclear weapons](http://www.jill2016.com/on_tax_day_stein_calls_for_massive_miliatary_cut). In what world is it considered a disarmament?', ">>{misella_landica} : What're you, some sort of pinko terrorist? Clearly every human being has the duty to swear fealty to Americas Dear Leaders", '>>{IbanezDavy} : Also we could literally have just 1000 nukes and still pose the same level of threat. In fact we only really need less than 100.', '>>{IbanezDavy} : If they want stuff passed. Yes. She has to sign them bills.']]

classify and reply

['>>{Aathroser} : I don\'t understand how this is different than a nexus phone... It just won\'t have an LG badge and will say "Google" instead?', ">>{zmmeyer} : Hmm. It'll be interesting to see Android run on hardware developed by Google themselves.", '>>{w1n5t0nM1k3y} : Is this the beginning of the end of third party phone manufacturers? Microsoft, Apple, and Google making their own phones, each with their own OS. In my opinion, the third party manufacturers on Android do nothing but make it look bad by not giving updates and filling the phones full of junkware.', ">>{awesom-o85} : Perhaps that is Google's plan. Google doesn't seem to have much pull when it comes to forcing third party manufacturers to update their devices, so they are making their own phone to put pressure on them to speed up their update process. Maybe?", ">>{Gumbaro} : Some people may disagree, but I find this exciting. I've had Motorola abandon updating a droid a month after buying it. I've had HTC give me a reasonable phone but it was always behind. And I've had Samsung constantly try to subvert my use of Google apps/tools with its own. Samsung even forced out the cute Google emoji. :(", '>>{sintron123} : I was thinking the same thing, I was under the impression that Nexus phones were Google especially cause they are the only project Fi phones.', '>>{Chaseism} : But I thought that was the whole idea of having those Nexus phones out there. They are pure Google and when Google updates, those phones are first in receiving it.', '>>{NeetaMRamO} : Nexus 6 owner here. AT&T still makes me wait for months to get updates', '>>{mockassin} : in the next year google will also be releasing its own line of : -home pregnancy kits -baby formula -erectile dysfunction medication -energy drink -semi automatic high caliber rifle -chain of highend hamburger restaurant franchises and their own brand of flavored vodkas', ">>{mrHwite2} : It's not just the lack of the LG logo (or equivalent). It also means Google itself is the manufacturer. It's the same as the Pixel tablet vs the Nexus 7/9", ">>{poopoospider} : They're still made by third party companies like LG and Huawei, Google only gives them certain guidelines IIRC and produces the packaging, as well as having a pure android experience tailored for each phone", '>>{WhatInYourPants} : Apple is very vertically integrated and have an OS people want. I doubt Google could ever really compete directly with the iPhone in wealthy markets. Google needs third party Android makers.', '>>{netrok} : He meant the unlocked version purchased directly from Google. AT&T still loads third party crap on the ones they sell.', '>>{flyonthwall} : yeah, but the 5x is garbage and barely better than the 5 for twice the price. this generation of nexus dropped the ball', '>>{StealthBlade98} : My question is will this be more secure than Apples Iphone or is this simply just a ploy for them to monitor us anytime and any place?', '>>{DineOmite} : Nexus 5 owner here. I get the updates as soon as their released.', '>>{w1n5t0nM1k3y} : I think if they offer a full line of phones from the $50 basic phone to the $700 flagship, then they could do pretty well without the third party manufacturers. They would legally need around 5-10 models to serve the current market they have, which might be a difficult thing to pull off.', '>>{Nohox} : Google already released their phone, Moto G, until they dropped Motorola.', ">>{poopoospider} : I believe the Pixel tablet already does this but I'm not sure if it's the only one", '>>{Ben--Cousins} : third party smart phones will still be a big market is lesser economically developed countries', '>>{MBTAHole} : Be interesting to see. Google has some real bombs in its past and Samsung holds their high end market. Curious to see where they plan on fitting in.', ">>{PeanutNore} : I never understood why nexus phones did not just get updates direct from Google, perhaps through the Play Store like app updates. The carrier driven model is understandable for phones distributed through the carriers that have various modifications and need a unique update. But with Nexus devices the exact configuration is a known quantity and I can't think of any technical limitation that would prevent Google from serving them updates directly like Apple does. My Moto X took almost a year to get to 5.1.1, but I can update my work iPhone 6 as soon as one is available and AT&T isn't involved at all.", ">>{HereComesPapaArima} : It's going for very low prices and is hardly 'garbage'. It's a good phone in it's own right and improves over the 5 in every way other than the RAM (ah, some people go to war over RAM) and wireless charging.", ">>{ameoba} : They'll still be made by LG or Huawei or Foxconn or whoever else. Google doesn't have production facilities.", '>>{beavertime} : There is no chance they plan on building manufacturing factories. Foxconn, or some other OEM will be the manufacturer. In which case the same question applies -- how is this different? Other companies will feed in processors and camera sensors and screens, memory chips and storage, and it will be assembled just like every other device. Google already guides the hardware, the design, things like the move away from physical (even capacitive) buttons, etc. This rumor appears yearly. It never makes any sense at all, and is usually rationalized by clearly wrong claims (and recall this was the big claim when Google bought Motorola -- which they did to eliminate a patent war threat -- "now there\'s going to be official, perfect Google devices!" They bored of that super quickly).. The single and only benefit would be that maybe Google could claim a larger amount of the take, but that take is not only usually tiny, sometimes it\'s a negative (the Pixel C is a great example, because it has almost certainly been a financial disaster for Google).', ">>{thegreenmushrooms} : Its different because google doesn't own the manufacturer. Actually google bought Motorola and sold it about a year later, while it owned the manufacturer, it produced Nexus 6. Google sold it because Samsung and other phone manufacturers were getting scared of google controlling both the android development and phone-manufacturing. Rumors started flying around that non Google phones will have to wait a really long time for any software updates and, as a result Samsung and others were making heavier modifications to Googles android system. Google and others interpreted it as phone manufacturers getting ready to make the leap to build their own OS. This was not the direction Google wanted to go in it likes everyone using all of their apps. As a result it sold of Motorola, since then people eased up software mods too, plus google got nice patents from Motorola as well and lost about 8 billion dollars between the buy and sell price.", '>>{monkeypowah} : Spyphone..it will literally get up in the night and rummage through your drawers.', ">>{CiDhed} : You could buy the N6 directly from google but put an att sim in it and it puts you on their update path. I don't think this happens with any other Nexus phones but it does happen with the N6 and ATT. By the time people noticed it the option was to wait for ATT to release the update or wipe it with a factory image directly from google. It could had been avoided by booting the phone for the first time with a non-att sim and then swapping sim cards afterwards. http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/01/21/psa-if-your-nexus-6-has-an-att-sim-card-your-android-updates-are-being-withheld-but-it-doesnt-actually-matter/", ">>{monkeypowah} : People actually upgrade...holy fuck, everytime an android update downloads itself...clear cache...force stop,.I never do updates...all you get is extra shite you don't want a slower phone and usually something important fucked up.", ">>{PeanutNore} : I bought an original Moto X during the period when Google owned Motorola because I thought it would mean a better updating experience than other manufacturers, and I got burned. As it is now, Google's inability to control the Android update process is like welfare for device manufacturers who withhold or delay updates to entice you into buying a new phone. My Moto X (2013) is suffering some serious hardware rot and can hardly send or receive calls anymore, but I'm definitely not buying another Moto, or giving my money to any of the other Android handset makers until Google sorts their shit out. In the meantime I use my work iPhone for calls and in certain ways it's a better experience.", '>>{Devam13} : Depends on how high end or which phone do you get. I have used both Galaxy S6 and Nexus 6P and I prefer Galaxy S6 in many ways. Other than the brilliant camera and screen, Samsung has added so many great features like splitwindow,multiwindow, resizing the size of an app so you can effectively open as many apps you want etc. You will realize once you use it. Samsung had this since almost 2 years and it is just now coming to Android N and only splitwindow is coming, not multiwindow. I have been recieving regular updates on my S6. Third party manufacturers are great for the ecosystem. Exclusivity is not good.', ">>{General_Stobo} : They do. Just dont buy phones from the carrier. They are the problem with a lot of this. I stopped buying Samsung phones because I was tired of all the S-Apps and AT&T Apps I never use. I honestly couldn't believe how clean my phone was when I got my Nexus 6p. Was bascially just a few google apps installed and that was it. No list of", ">>{PeanutNore} : Apple isn't that vertically integrated. The screens and flash memory in iPhones are mostly made by Samsung, the cameras are Sony, the SoC is made in a third party fab and the whole thing is assembled by Foxconn. It's sheer volume of production, not vertical integration, that keeps the cost under control. Anyone could use the same third party suppliers to build a device to the same quality level, and Google could afford to take a loss at first to get the volume up to profitability.", ">>{DoyleReddit} : Are those emoji the same as in Hangouts? Because those emoji are super lame. Only thing I don't like about Hangouts. Also all the dumb stamp style things whatever the hell they are.", '>>{ScuzzyAyanami} : HTC, Samsung, LG, Motorola Mobility, Huawei and Asus have all been comissioned to manufacture various models of Nexus phones and tablets throughout the years.', ">>{WhatInYourPants} : Apple designs it all. Apple aren't buying a Samsung ARM processor, Samsung are fabricating ARM chips using Apple's designs. It's the same with virtually all Apple components. Apple's ARM designs are some of the best in the world, and on the iPhone they usually result in the fastest smartphones in the world according to real world benchmarks. I'm sure Google has the heft to do the same but Apple's been at it for a long while now. I hope Google does get it right and gives Apple's designs a run for their money. The next iPhone could always do with being just that little bit faster.", ">>{Gumbaro} : To each their own. I know the Google ones aren't popular, but removing the option of choice sucked.", '>>{flyonthwall} : battery life is the same or worse. LG even admitted to sacrificing battery capacity AND wireless charging in order to place the fingerprint sensor in a certain spot. which is fucking dumb. price is markedly higher. whereas nexus up until now has always been about value for money rather than unnecessary frills. STILL no sd card slot, and no improvement on the internal storage space over the 5. 16gb on the base model is absolutely ridiculous in 2016 from my own testing, even with the "faster" processor, the phone runs at almost exactly the same speed as the 5. 2gb of ram in a $380 phone is fucking embarrassing the battery and storage were the weakest aspects of the nexus 5. and the price point was its strongest. for the 5x they made literally no improvements to the weak points, and made the strong point worse even 3 years on. the 5 is a better value phone than the 5x.', '>>{fraragra} : Been looking to switch to project fi (and get a new phone), I guess I should wait until this new phone launches?', ">>{enzo86} : I recently went from a 5 to a 5X and I've noticed nothing but improved performance. Sure the 5 was 3 years old and had taken the standard beating but I think the 5X is far superior directly out of the box than the 5. Also who pays $380 for a 5X when you can get it for $200 through ProjectFi, cancel the service, then put the phone on whatever carrier you want. If you know how to buy it the 5X is the same value if not better than the 5. Edit: cause of the individual below me.", ">>{HereComesPapaArima} : $380? Dude what? It's going for mid 200s as far as I know. And no SD Card slot is a given for Nexi, you should've known. And day to day performance of Nexus 4 and 5 is same. Is 5 shit because of that? No. I get the battery problems and wireless charging but I love how the phone looks. And yes, storage is a problem, but for me, 32GB is *just* safe. > for the 5x they literally made no improvements to the weak points Ah, yes, the camera on the 5X is absolutely trash I agree with you yeah yup. That was the most shat on point of the 5 as far as I know. 5 is a great value phone, no doubt. But 5X is coming close. But if you want wireless charging go to 5. If not, 5X. I heard of a deal where it was going for $230. That's a good deal. I myself want to buy a 6p (priced in mid 400s) but will wait till the new Nexi release so that 6p drops to mid 300s. Prices drop, magic right? Edit: I don't own a 5x by the way.", '>>{flyonthwall} : price drop recently. 380 was the launch price. no sd card slot is fine if you have decent internal storage. 16/32gb is not decent and I cannot understate how terrible the battery is. It does not last a day. Not even under moderate use', ">>{PeanutNore} : My phone came with Android 4.1 - I've gotten two major updates, to versions 4.4 and then 5.1, and each time it has made for a much better experience.", '>>{PeanutNore} : Google has already been designing their own processors for various devices in their datacenters, so they have some experience there to draw on.', ">>{Teddy_Raptor} : I have an S6 and I just got marshmellow a month ago. Absurd. Just as many useful apps as there are, there's just as many that are shit. Don't get me wrong, I love the phone, but a controlled updating environment that works perfectly with Android would interest me a lot.", ">>{lostintransactions} : Who do you think will make them? Is Google buying it's own factory in China? Google is an ad company not a manufacturer.", '>>{monkeypowah} : Different experiences...1st upgrade on my Note and I lost the native browser...it was the most perfect one I had ever used, the new one was bollocks, formatting was dreadful...I tried every 3rd party, they all were not as good...finally I found a clone outside the playstore, it had good reviews, still works like a treat...upgraded my Note2 and list bluetooth...sent it back twice, upgraded phone anyway and its in a drawer with no bluetooth.', '>>{lostintransactions} : and they will all still be commissioned to do the "true" Google phone.', ">>{Devam13} : I have Marshmallow since like a month after Marshmallow was released for Nexuses. I am assuming you are from the US. I don't know why but you guys have to rely on your mobile carriers for your updates. Obviously there is room for improvement but I personally really enjoy the features Samsung adds. Now that bloatware is not installed on Samsung phones like it was years ago, I am pretty certain my next phone will be Samsung too. But if you live in the US and have to rely on carriers for updates, you may have a different story.", ">>{PeanutNore} : Twice. The problem began after we moved to a new building at work that's basically a Faraday cage, and the phone, which is on Verizon, was basically running the cellular radio at max power full time to try and reach the tower. It would consistently become extremely hot and stay hot all day, and I think it was damaged by doing this. My iPhone is on AT&T and is able to get a reliable though not very good signal and doesn't heat up.", ">>{mrHwite2} : Sure, they'll use subcontractors. But they'll have more control over design & production, more consumer confidence in the product, and, as many people point out, even if they take a loss it's going to put pressure on 3rd party manufacturers and improve the Android name in the long run. Google Fiber didn't make them a quick buck, neither did Project Fi. Their autonomous cars aren't making them any money. We're talking about a company that has always innovated and explored new avenues. I don't see any reason Google wouldn't produce their own flagship Android devices to represent their brand, even if that means operating at a loss for a while.", ">>{HereComesPapaArima} : 5X was $350 at launch or something while 5 was 20-30 less. Oh well. Edit: Just checked. The 5x (60h) improves on the 5's (38-40) battery by 20 hours (GSMArena Endurance Ratings). So they improved, not as much as you'd like it. Also, do you speak of the Nexus 5X from personal experience? Like, have you used it as your daily driver anytime?", '>>{WhatInYourPants} : And they can certainly afford to hire some of the best guys in the world to design their chips.', '>>{flyonthwall} : and yes. i have. and i can tell you with absolute certainty, the battery life is almost identical to the 5 in real world usage. It does not last a full 12 hour day.', '>>{beavertime} : >But they\'ll have more control over design & production, more consumer confidence in the product Neither the Chromebook Pixel or Pixel C are successes. Both have been heavily panned and are grossly overpriced. Remember the Nexus Q? Yeah, that was fully made within Google. Honestly, in what world would anyone have more "confidence" in Google hardware versus Samsung or HTC or LG? This is an argument derived from fantasy land. Google doesn\'t make screens. Google doesn\'t make processors (well, not mobile ones). Google doesn\'t make memory chips or storage chips or anything else. Like everyone else they would be putting things together. >We\'re talking about a company that has always innovated and explored new avenues. This is just meaningless patter. I mean, this same rumor has appeared yearly since the beginning of Android. The purchase of Motorola was supposed to make it real....crashed to the ground. Now again they\'ll have some hand wavy, ethereal "more control"....but it\'s just bullshit. It\'s all just bullshit.', '>>{HereComesPapaArima} : Ok lets list things + Improvement in Design + + SD 808 + + Camera + + Fingerprint sensor + - Storage - - Battery - - Wireless Charging - Seems like an ok deal for me to be honest.', ">>{sr_dipstick} : I meant Google. With Google location services, search histories, etc. I can already pretty much see/review my daily activities. It's a bit scary the amount of information they have by default...the average smartphone user isn't going to shut that stuff off either. Edit: spelling", '>>{flyonthwall} : Improvement in Design + the fuck does that even mean? storage and battery trump everything else on that list. since theyre less than adequate. It doesnt matter how good a phones camera is or weather it has a fucking fingerprint sensor. If it dies before the end of the day it is worse than useless', ">>{awesom-o85} : If I'm honest with myself, I'm inclined to agree with you. Android updates have been the bane of my existence ever since everything past the G1. Unfortunately, the open OS model is a double edged sword. On one hand, users have the freedom to do with their phone as they wish. This has been my driving force in supporting Android for the past 8 years. On the other hand, the same open model is what is keeping Android from becoming a true Apple competitor. Allowing for any manufacturer to use the base software also allows for these manufacturers to add their bloat and slow or even kill updates to their hardware. But even that is linked to the real problem in the consumer tech world of planned obsolescence. Greed, it seems, is the real problem here. I just want to buy a phone with good hardware that is obviously capable of running the latest and greatest operating system for more than 2 years that isn't part of a walled garden eco system. Shit, even something that will last (with manufacturer update support) for 3 years would be worth it to me, but even Google is dropping Nexus devices from their software support (that are more than capable) after 2 years! It's ridiculous!!", ">>{poopoospider} : Doesn't Google already have their own family of devices, the Pixel? I'm not sure if they're the ones that specifically manufacture them but they're Google branded", '>>{Mindcoitus} : Exactly, makes sense. Maybe a pixel phone this time?', ">>{mrHwite2} : Why does Google continue to sell the Chromebook Pixel if it's a failure? Why on earth would they sell a $1000 laptop in a market specifically marketed as being budget friendly? Because their measure of success is not the same as yours.", ">>{beavertime} : >Because their measure of success is not the same as yours. If you need to contrive bullshit to support rumor, the rumor is most certainly false. >Why does Google continue to sell the Chromebook Pixel if it's a failure? I don't think you understand how this all works. See, Google spent all of the money on design and meetings and planning and coordination and orchestrating suppliers to make the product. Simply continuing to manufacture the device is a marginal cost (made by a company like Foxconn) in comparison. Google *thought* the Pixel would be a big deal. They did ad campaigns and made a really big deal about it. Then it flopped to the floor like a dead fish. It will slowly move away from appearance, and there will be no successor.", '>>{mrHwite2} : So eloquent. I suppose the Chromebook Pixel failed so hard that it only made sense to try it with another product, right? Right?! And if you think it\'s "contriving bullshit" to say your measure of success is distinct from Google\'s, get over yourself', ">>{beavertime} : >I suppose the Chromebook Pixel failed so hard that it only made sense to try it with another product, right? Errr, what? The Pixel was a flop. The Pixel C is trying something entirely different (I mean *entirely* different). It too is flopping on the floor. >to say your measure of success is distinct from Google's Repeatedly you've supported a vague claim with provable *nonsense*. It has nothing to do with motives, and everything to do with comparing *rumored*, unsupported claims compared to what Google has actually done time and time again. The two are very much out of sync.", '>>{mrHwite2} : > Repeatedly you\'ve supported a vague claim with provable nonsense I have? Repeatedly? When? Opposing a claim that "there is no chance" something will ever happen is far from supporting a rumor that it\'s happening now. I hope they come out with a Pixel phone because I\'ll buy it in a heartbeat. I think it makes sense to have a showcase lineup of high quality products to represent their brands. Go ahead and disagree as vehemently as you\'d like.', '>>{mrHwite2} : [Well, there you have it...](http://www.androidpolice.com/2016/09/01/google-will-announce-pixel-phones-4k-chromecast-google-home-daydream-vr-viewer-on-october-4th/)', '>>{beavertime} : This may take the cake as the most undeserved "Told you so" in the history of reddit. You understand that the sole change is that Google is moving from the "Nexus" branding to the "Pixel" branding, right? That the devices were designed and made by HTC? Your core claim was- "It\'s not just the lack of the LG logo (or equivalent). It also means Google itself is the manufacturer." **WRONG**', ">>{mrHwite2} : Uh.... > Sure, they'll use subcontractors. But they'll have more control over design & production but don't let me stop you from continuing to put words in my mouth", '>>{mrHwite2} : Acknowledged, my words were far from true when I said they\'d be "the manufacturer" of the phone. And yet right there in plain text is a clarification that they\'d use a subcontractor and I simply entertained the idea that releasing a Pixel-branded phone is a definite possibility to expand their product lineup. That\'s an idea that you so vehemently disagreed with; so, whose hilariously stupid incorrectness is this exactly? You are a bitter person. So very bitter. You must be a hoot']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Aathroser} : I don\'t understand how this is different than a nexus phone... It just won\'t have an LG badge and will say "Google" instead?', ">>{zmmeyer} : Hmm. It'll be interesting to see Android run on hardware developed by Google themselves.", '>>{w1n5t0nM1k3y} : Is this the beginning of the end of third party phone manufacturers? Microsoft, Apple, and Google making their own phones, each with their own OS. In my opinion, the third party manufacturers on Android do nothing but make it look bad by not giving updates and filling the phones full of junkware.', ">>{awesom-o85} : Perhaps that is Google's plan. Google doesn't seem to have much pull when it comes to forcing third party manufacturers to update their devices, so they are making their own phone to put pressure on them to speed up their update process. Maybe?", ">>{Gumbaro} : Some people may disagree, but I find this exciting. I've had Motorola abandon updating a droid a month after buying it. I've had HTC give me a reasonable phone but it was always behind. And I've had Samsung constantly try to subvert my use of Google apps/tools with its own. Samsung even forced out the cute Google emoji. :(", '>>{sintron123} : I was thinking the same thing, I was under the impression that Nexus phones were Google especially cause they are the only project Fi phones.', '>>{Chaseism} : But I thought that was the whole idea of having those Nexus phones out there. They are pure Google and when Google updates, those phones are first in receiving it.', '>>{NeetaMRamO} : Nexus 6 owner here. AT&T still makes me wait for months to get updates', '>>{mockassin} : in the next year google will also be releasing its own line of : -home pregnancy kits -baby formula -erectile dysfunction medication -energy drink -semi automatic high caliber rifle -chain of highend hamburger restaurant franchises and their own brand of flavored vodkas', ">>{mrHwite2} : It's not just the lack of the LG logo (or equivalent). It also means Google itself is the manufacturer. It's the same as the Pixel tablet vs the Nexus 7/9", ">>{poopoospider} : They're still made by third party companies like LG and Huawei, Google only gives them certain guidelines IIRC and produces the packaging, as well as having a pure android experience tailored for each phone", '>>{WhatInYourPants} : Apple is very vertically integrated and have an OS people want. I doubt Google could ever really compete directly with the iPhone in wealthy markets. Google needs third party Android makers.', '>>{netrok} : He meant the unlocked version purchased directly from Google. AT&T still loads third party crap on the ones they sell.', '>>{flyonthwall} : yeah, but the 5x is garbage and barely better than the 5 for twice the price. this generation of nexus dropped the ball', '>>{StealthBlade98} : My question is will this be more secure than Apples Iphone or is this simply just a ploy for them to monitor us anytime and any place?', '>>{DineOmite} : Nexus 5 owner here. I get the updates as soon as their released.', '>>{w1n5t0nM1k3y} : I think if they offer a full line of phones from the $50 basic phone to the $700 flagship, then they could do pretty well without the third party manufacturers. They would legally need around 5-10 models to serve the current market they have, which might be a difficult thing to pull off.', '>>{Nohox} : Google already released their phone, Moto G, until they dropped Motorola.', ">>{poopoospider} : I believe the Pixel tablet already does this but I'm not sure if it's the only one", '>>{Ben--Cousins} : third party smart phones will still be a big market is lesser economically developed countries', '>>{MBTAHole} : Be interesting to see. Google has some real bombs in its past and Samsung holds their high end market. Curious to see where they plan on fitting in.', ">>{PeanutNore} : I never understood why nexus phones did not just get updates direct from Google, perhaps through the Play Store like app updates. The carrier driven model is understandable for phones distributed through the carriers that have various modifications and need a unique update. But with Nexus devices the exact configuration is a known quantity and I can't think of any technical limitation that would prevent Google from serving them updates directly like Apple does. My Moto X took almost a year to get to 5.1.1, but I can update my work iPhone 6 as soon as one is available and AT&T isn't involved at all.", ">>{HereComesPapaArima} : It's going for very low prices and is hardly 'garbage'. It's a good phone in it's own right and improves over the 5 in every way other than the RAM (ah, some people go to war over RAM) and wireless charging.", ">>{ameoba} : They'll still be made by LG or Huawei or Foxconn or whoever else. Google doesn't have production facilities.", '>>{beavertime} : There is no chance they plan on building manufacturing factories. Foxconn, or some other OEM will be the manufacturer. In which case the same question applies -- how is this different? Other companies will feed in processors and camera sensors and screens, memory chips and storage, and it will be assembled just like every other device. Google already guides the hardware, the design, things like the move away from physical (even capacitive) buttons, etc. This rumor appears yearly. It never makes any sense at all, and is usually rationalized by clearly wrong claims (and recall this was the big claim when Google bought Motorola -- which they did to eliminate a patent war threat -- "now there\'s going to be official, perfect Google devices!" They bored of that super quickly).. The single and only benefit would be that maybe Google could claim a larger amount of the take, but that take is not only usually tiny, sometimes it\'s a negative (the Pixel C is a great example, because it has almost certainly been a financial disaster for Google).', ">>{thegreenmushrooms} : Its different because google doesn't own the manufacturer. Actually google bought Motorola and sold it about a year later, while it owned the manufacturer, it produced Nexus 6. Google sold it because Samsung and other phone manufacturers were getting scared of google controlling both the android development and phone-manufacturing. Rumors started flying around that non Google phones will have to wait a really long time for any software updates and, as a result Samsung and others were making heavier modifications to Googles android system. Google and others interpreted it as phone manufacturers getting ready to make the leap to build their own OS. This was not the direction Google wanted to go in it likes everyone using all of their apps. As a result it sold of Motorola, since then people eased up software mods too, plus google got nice patents from Motorola as well and lost about 8 billion dollars between the buy and sell price.", '>>{monkeypowah} : Spyphone..it will literally get up in the night and rummage through your drawers.', ">>{CiDhed} : You could buy the N6 directly from google but put an att sim in it and it puts you on their update path. I don't think this happens with any other Nexus phones but it does happen with the N6 and ATT. By the time people noticed it the option was to wait for ATT to release the update or wipe it with a factory image directly from google. It could had been avoided by booting the phone for the first time with a non-att sim and then swapping sim cards afterwards. http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/01/21/psa-if-your-nexus-6-has-an-att-sim-card-your-android-updates-are-being-withheld-but-it-doesnt-actually-matter/", ">>{monkeypowah} : People actually upgrade...holy fuck, everytime an android update downloads itself...clear cache...force stop,.I never do updates...all you get is extra shite you don't want a slower phone and usually something important fucked up.", ">>{PeanutNore} : I bought an original Moto X during the period when Google owned Motorola because I thought it would mean a better updating experience than other manufacturers, and I got burned. As it is now, Google's inability to control the Android update process is like welfare for device manufacturers who withhold or delay updates to entice you into buying a new phone. My Moto X (2013) is suffering some serious hardware rot and can hardly send or receive calls anymore, but I'm definitely not buying another Moto, or giving my money to any of the other Android handset makers until Google sorts their shit out. In the meantime I use my work iPhone for calls and in certain ways it's a better experience.", '>>{Devam13} : Depends on how high end or which phone do you get. I have used both Galaxy S6 and Nexus 6P and I prefer Galaxy S6 in many ways. Other than the brilliant camera and screen, Samsung has added so many great features like splitwindow,multiwindow, resizing the size of an app so you can effectively open as many apps you want etc. You will realize once you use it. Samsung had this since almost 2 years and it is just now coming to Android N and only splitwindow is coming, not multiwindow. I have been recieving regular updates on my S6. Third party manufacturers are great for the ecosystem. Exclusivity is not good.', ">>{General_Stobo} : They do. Just dont buy phones from the carrier. They are the problem with a lot of this. I stopped buying Samsung phones because I was tired of all the S-Apps and AT&T Apps I never use. I honestly couldn't believe how clean my phone was when I got my Nexus 6p. Was bascially just a few google apps installed and that was it. No list of", ">>{PeanutNore} : Apple isn't that vertically integrated. The screens and flash memory in iPhones are mostly made by Samsung, the cameras are Sony, the SoC is made in a third party fab and the whole thing is assembled by Foxconn. It's sheer volume of production, not vertical integration, that keeps the cost under control. Anyone could use the same third party suppliers to build a device to the same quality level, and Google could afford to take a loss at first to get the volume up to profitability.", ">>{DoyleReddit} : Are those emoji the same as in Hangouts? Because those emoji are super lame. Only thing I don't like about Hangouts. Also all the dumb stamp style things whatever the hell they are.", '>>{ScuzzyAyanami} : HTC, Samsung, LG, Motorola Mobility, Huawei and Asus have all been comissioned to manufacture various models of Nexus phones and tablets throughout the years.', ">>{WhatInYourPants} : Apple designs it all. Apple aren't buying a Samsung ARM processor, Samsung are fabricating ARM chips using Apple's designs. It's the same with virtually all Apple components. Apple's ARM designs are some of the best in the world, and on the iPhone they usually result in the fastest smartphones in the world according to real world benchmarks. I'm sure Google has the heft to do the same but Apple's been at it for a long while now. I hope Google does get it right and gives Apple's designs a run for their money. The next iPhone could always do with being just that little bit faster.", ">>{Gumbaro} : To each their own. I know the Google ones aren't popular, but removing the option of choice sucked.", '>>{flyonthwall} : battery life is the same or worse. LG even admitted to sacrificing battery capacity AND wireless charging in order to place the fingerprint sensor in a certain spot. which is fucking dumb. price is markedly higher. whereas nexus up until now has always been about value for money rather than unnecessary frills. STILL no sd card slot, and no improvement on the internal storage space over the 5. 16gb on the base model is absolutely ridiculous in 2016 from my own testing, even with the "faster" processor, the phone runs at almost exactly the same speed as the 5. 2gb of ram in a $380 phone is fucking embarrassing the battery and storage were the weakest aspects of the nexus 5. and the price point was its strongest. for the 5x they made literally no improvements to the weak points, and made the strong point worse even 3 years on. the 5 is a better value phone than the 5x.', '>>{fraragra} : Been looking to switch to project fi (and get a new phone), I guess I should wait until this new phone launches?', ">>{enzo86} : I recently went from a 5 to a 5X and I've noticed nothing but improved performance. Sure the 5 was 3 years old and had taken the standard beating but I think the 5X is far superior directly out of the box than the 5. Also who pays $380 for a 5X when you can get it for $200 through ProjectFi, cancel the service, then put the phone on whatever carrier you want. If you know how to buy it the 5X is the same value if not better than the 5. Edit: cause of the individual below me.", ">>{HereComesPapaArima} : $380? Dude what? It's going for mid 200s as far as I know. And no SD Card slot is a given for Nexi, you should've known. And day to day performance of Nexus 4 and 5 is same. Is 5 shit because of that? No. I get the battery problems and wireless charging but I love how the phone looks. And yes, storage is a problem, but for me, 32GB is *just* safe. > for the 5x they literally made no improvements to the weak points Ah, yes, the camera on the 5X is absolutely trash I agree with you yeah yup. That was the most shat on point of the 5 as far as I know. 5 is a great value phone, no doubt. But 5X is coming close. But if you want wireless charging go to 5. If not, 5X. I heard of a deal where it was going for $230. That's a good deal. I myself want to buy a 6p (priced in mid 400s) but will wait till the new Nexi release so that 6p drops to mid 300s. Prices drop, magic right? Edit: I don't own a 5x by the way.", '>>{flyonthwall} : price drop recently. 380 was the launch price. no sd card slot is fine if you have decent internal storage. 16/32gb is not decent and I cannot understate how terrible the battery is. It does not last a day. Not even under moderate use', ">>{PeanutNore} : My phone came with Android 4.1 - I've gotten two major updates, to versions 4.4 and then 5.1, and each time it has made for a much better experience.", '>>{PeanutNore} : Google has already been designing their own processors for various devices in their datacenters, so they have some experience there to draw on.', ">>{Teddy_Raptor} : I have an S6 and I just got marshmellow a month ago. Absurd. Just as many useful apps as there are, there's just as many that are shit. Don't get me wrong, I love the phone, but a controlled updating environment that works perfectly with Android would interest me a lot.", ">>{lostintransactions} : Who do you think will make them? Is Google buying it's own factory in China? Google is an ad company not a manufacturer.", '>>{monkeypowah} : Different experiences...1st upgrade on my Note and I lost the native browser...it was the most perfect one I had ever used, the new one was bollocks, formatting was dreadful...I tried every 3rd party, they all were not as good...finally I found a clone outside the playstore, it had good reviews, still works like a treat...upgraded my Note2 and list bluetooth...sent it back twice, upgraded phone anyway and its in a drawer with no bluetooth.', '>>{lostintransactions} : and they will all still be commissioned to do the "true" Google phone.', ">>{Devam13} : I have Marshmallow since like a month after Marshmallow was released for Nexuses. I am assuming you are from the US. I don't know why but you guys have to rely on your mobile carriers for your updates. Obviously there is room for improvement but I personally really enjoy the features Samsung adds. Now that bloatware is not installed on Samsung phones like it was years ago, I am pretty certain my next phone will be Samsung too. But if you live in the US and have to rely on carriers for updates, you may have a different story.", ">>{PeanutNore} : Twice. The problem began after we moved to a new building at work that's basically a Faraday cage, and the phone, which is on Verizon, was basically running the cellular radio at max power full time to try and reach the tower. It would consistently become extremely hot and stay hot all day, and I think it was damaged by doing this. My iPhone is on AT&T and is able to get a reliable though not very good signal and doesn't heat up.", ">>{mrHwite2} : Sure, they'll use subcontractors. But they'll have more control over design & production, more consumer confidence in the product, and, as many people point out, even if they take a loss it's going to put pressure on 3rd party manufacturers and improve the Android name in the long run. Google Fiber didn't make them a quick buck, neither did Project Fi. Their autonomous cars aren't making them any money. We're talking about a company that has always innovated and explored new avenues. I don't see any reason Google wouldn't produce their own flagship Android devices to represent their brand, even if that means operating at a loss for a while.", ">>{HereComesPapaArima} : 5X was $350 at launch or something while 5 was 20-30 less. Oh well. Edit: Just checked. The 5x (60h) improves on the 5's (38-40) battery by 20 hours (GSMArena Endurance Ratings). So they improved, not as much as you'd like it. Also, do you speak of the Nexus 5X from personal experience? Like, have you used it as your daily driver anytime?", '>>{WhatInYourPants} : And they can certainly afford to hire some of the best guys in the world to design their chips.', '>>{flyonthwall} : and yes. i have. and i can tell you with absolute certainty, the battery life is almost identical to the 5 in real world usage. It does not last a full 12 hour day.', '>>{beavertime} : >But they\'ll have more control over design & production, more consumer confidence in the product Neither the Chromebook Pixel or Pixel C are successes. Both have been heavily panned and are grossly overpriced. Remember the Nexus Q? Yeah, that was fully made within Google. Honestly, in what world would anyone have more "confidence" in Google hardware versus Samsung or HTC or LG? This is an argument derived from fantasy land. Google doesn\'t make screens. Google doesn\'t make processors (well, not mobile ones). Google doesn\'t make memory chips or storage chips or anything else. Like everyone else they would be putting things together. >We\'re talking about a company that has always innovated and explored new avenues. This is just meaningless patter. I mean, this same rumor has appeared yearly since the beginning of Android. The purchase of Motorola was supposed to make it real....crashed to the ground. Now again they\'ll have some hand wavy, ethereal "more control"....but it\'s just bullshit. It\'s all just bullshit.', '>>{HereComesPapaArima} : Ok lets list things + Improvement in Design + + SD 808 + + Camera + + Fingerprint sensor + - Storage - - Battery - - Wireless Charging - Seems like an ok deal for me to be honest.', ">>{sr_dipstick} : I meant Google. With Google location services, search histories, etc. I can already pretty much see/review my daily activities. It's a bit scary the amount of information they have by default...the average smartphone user isn't going to shut that stuff off either. Edit: spelling", '>>{flyonthwall} : Improvement in Design + the fuck does that even mean? storage and battery trump everything else on that list. since theyre less than adequate. It doesnt matter how good a phones camera is or weather it has a fucking fingerprint sensor. If it dies before the end of the day it is worse than useless', ">>{awesom-o85} : If I'm honest with myself, I'm inclined to agree with you. Android updates have been the bane of my existence ever since everything past the G1. Unfortunately, the open OS model is a double edged sword. On one hand, users have the freedom to do with their phone as they wish. This has been my driving force in supporting Android for the past 8 years. On the other hand, the same open model is what is keeping Android from becoming a true Apple competitor. Allowing for any manufacturer to use the base software also allows for these manufacturers to add their bloat and slow or even kill updates to their hardware. But even that is linked to the real problem in the consumer tech world of planned obsolescence. Greed, it seems, is the real problem here. I just want to buy a phone with good hardware that is obviously capable of running the latest and greatest operating system for more than 2 years that isn't part of a walled garden eco system. Shit, even something that will last (with manufacturer update support) for 3 years would be worth it to me, but even Google is dropping Nexus devices from their software support (that are more than capable) after 2 years! It's ridiculous!!", ">>{poopoospider} : Doesn't Google already have their own family of devices, the Pixel? I'm not sure if they're the ones that specifically manufacture them but they're Google branded", '>>{Mindcoitus} : Exactly, makes sense. Maybe a pixel phone this time?', ">>{mrHwite2} : Why does Google continue to sell the Chromebook Pixel if it's a failure? Why on earth would they sell a $1000 laptop in a market specifically marketed as being budget friendly? Because their measure of success is not the same as yours.", ">>{beavertime} : >Because their measure of success is not the same as yours. If you need to contrive bullshit to support rumor, the rumor is most certainly false. >Why does Google continue to sell the Chromebook Pixel if it's a failure? I don't think you understand how this all works. See, Google spent all of the money on design and meetings and planning and coordination and orchestrating suppliers to make the product. Simply continuing to manufacture the device is a marginal cost (made by a company like Foxconn) in comparison. Google *thought* the Pixel would be a big deal. They did ad campaigns and made a really big deal about it. Then it flopped to the floor like a dead fish. It will slowly move away from appearance, and there will be no successor.", '>>{mrHwite2} : So eloquent. I suppose the Chromebook Pixel failed so hard that it only made sense to try it with another product, right? Right?! And if you think it\'s "contriving bullshit" to say your measure of success is distinct from Google\'s, get over yourself', ">>{beavertime} : >I suppose the Chromebook Pixel failed so hard that it only made sense to try it with another product, right? Errr, what? The Pixel was a flop. The Pixel C is trying something entirely different (I mean *entirely* different). It too is flopping on the floor. >to say your measure of success is distinct from Google's Repeatedly you've supported a vague claim with provable *nonsense*. It has nothing to do with motives, and everything to do with comparing *rumored*, unsupported claims compared to what Google has actually done time and time again. The two are very much out of sync.", '>>{mrHwite2} : > Repeatedly you\'ve supported a vague claim with provable nonsense I have? Repeatedly? When? Opposing a claim that "there is no chance" something will ever happen is far from supporting a rumor that it\'s happening now. I hope they come out with a Pixel phone because I\'ll buy it in a heartbeat. I think it makes sense to have a showcase lineup of high quality products to represent their brands. Go ahead and disagree as vehemently as you\'d like.', '>>{mrHwite2} : [Well, there you have it...](http://www.androidpolice.com/2016/09/01/google-will-announce-pixel-phones-4k-chromecast-google-home-daydream-vr-viewer-on-october-4th/)', '>>{beavertime} : This may take the cake as the most undeserved "Told you so" in the history of reddit. You understand that the sole change is that Google is moving from the "Nexus" branding to the "Pixel" branding, right? That the devices were designed and made by HTC? Your core claim was- "It\'s not just the lack of the LG logo (or equivalent). It also means Google itself is the manufacturer." **WRONG**', ">>{mrHwite2} : Uh.... > Sure, they'll use subcontractors. But they'll have more control over design & production but don't let me stop you from continuing to put words in my mouth", '>>{mrHwite2} : Acknowledged, my words were far from true when I said they\'d be "the manufacturer" of the phone. And yet right there in plain text is a clarification that they\'d use a subcontractor and I simply entertained the idea that releasing a Pixel-branded phone is a definite possibility to expand their product lineup. That\'s an idea that you so vehemently disagreed with; so, whose hilariously stupid incorrectness is this exactly? You are a bitter person. So very bitter. You must be a hoot']]

classify and reply

[">>{nhaling2xhale} : Don't know why you're being down voted, the answer is no, but it's a damn good question!", '>>{WhyMnemosyne} : His supporters just have to stop hiring them, problem over. Yes Trump does get support from conservative PACS or other organizations in various ways that keeps his name as pitiful victim in the news and supports the very openly racist hate campaign of Donald Trump.', ">>{11097} : Pence: We're Not Talking About Trump's Birtherism, It's A '4-Year-Old Issue'", ">>{CNegan} : If this is true, they'd of had nothing to lose and everything to gain by releasing the raw video.", '>>{tsenaku} : During this election more people have been caught committing voter fraud in order to report said fraud than actual cases of fraud itself. In 2008 the number of cases of Voter fraud was 86. Voter fraud is a non-issue and additional ID laws make it harder for people to vote specifically people who are poor or lack access to social services (these people tend to vote Democrat)', '>>{woodtick57} : you poor fool...this bullshit has been debunked over and over again. NY does not have same day registration. they would have had to register all those people before hand! did they make several fake IDs for them to register with?!?! idiots will always be taken in by such obvious BS, like you have been...', '>>{Wrym} : What prominent or even elected member of the left has condoned it?', '>>{Lorenzo_Canyon} : You wish voter fraud would be the reason Trump loses.', ">>{BugFix} : Sorry, who is excusing violence against Trump supporters? This is vile, and must stop. It's bad when Trump folks start fights with protesters. It's bad when protesters start fights with Trump folks. Both have happened. Both are equally vile. Stop it, people.", ">>{woodtick57} : and voter id at the polls wouldn't have stopped those as they were mostly done by election officials. the best study ever done of voter fraud that ID at the polls would stop showed 11 cases in 11 years nation wide. that is one per year.", '>>{vegan8r} : Why does it say popcorn next to your name?', '>>{ApwnSauce} : this begs question: how much quicker does it charge putting it in OFF mode?', '>>{BleepBloopSon} : You know, when you hold the power button and slide the slider.', ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Oh, turning it off? Never heard of it referred to as off mode. But I'd guess it charges a little quicker than a phone on sleep mode and airplane mode.", ">>{tsenaku} : Flairs for the election. There's one for every state but I'm Canadian so I picked popcorn.", ">>{montydad5000} : Unless I'm mistaken, even if you turn your phone all the way off, plugging it into a charger will automatically turn it back on. Can you then shut it off while it's charging? I didn't think you could.", ">>{SirCamelman} : Yeah if I need to charge my phone up a bit faster whilst I'm getting ready to go out or something I'll plug it in, then turn it off. Not sure how much faster it actually charges but it usually gets that top up it needs haha", '>>{antisoshal} : Ive lived my entire life watching the "right" excuse violence against a large portion of humanity for a littany of reasons. While I dont condone violence, youll excuse me if I find the premise of the right complaining about the actions of a small number of people on single occasions comedic in the face of right wing inspired and condoned violence, terrorism and hatred. They are both wrong and its a stupid thing to do, but you sound ridiculous acting like a genocide is occurring and you need to be protected from the hoards of raging leftists. More people get beaten in a Chicago weekend for simply being black than have been harmed at all the Trump events. Welcome to reality. You spend ten years spreading hatred and fear, you are gonna get some on your shit. By the way, faking pictures of injured people doesnt help your cause either. Seeing Bruce Campbell call you guys out for that yesterday was hysterical.', '>>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Yes, just turn it off while the charger is plugged in. It only boots up if you plug it in after you turn it off.', ">>{Ceteris__Paribus} : Why not? I thought Low Power Mode worked by reducing the amount of background tasks, such as checking for email, in order to save battery. Putting the phone in low power to charge should mean less battery consumption while it is trying to charge up. Maybe the answer is that the difference is small, but you didn't convince me that the answer is no.", '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : So it should be easy for Donald Trump to tell the people of the U.S.A. that yes, our President Obama was born in the U.S.A. Easy, but even as a candidate, the Republican Party candidate for President of all the people of the U.S.A., he refuses.', ">>{utterlygodless} : Fascism is not be debated, it is to be destroyed. That's what Trump is, a fascist. In the same sense that Pinochet was, as was Franco and Mussolini. He might as well reignite the Bund Organization.", '>>{fhjkgk} : Depends on your definition of charging speed. The rate of charging is technically still the same.', '>>{uwjames} : Or better yet... [Sanders condemns violence at Trump’s San Jose rally](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/03/sanders-condemns-violence-at-trumps-san-jose-rally/)', '>>{Wrym} : As one unapologetically on the left let me add my voice: arrest, prosecute, and jail the violent thugs.', '>>{mt_weather} : I mean, we tried to ask David "I\'m too pussy to finish an AMA on reddit for fake internet points" Brock, but he ditched out...', ">>{grannyinspace} : Have you seen the video? Your argument is invalid. Also, just because voter fraud isn't uncovered doesn't matter it doesn't happen. That you don't have to show ID in order to vote is insane.", '>>{Ceteris__Paribus} : Yeah, sure, but OP is almost certainly wanting to know wether the phone battery will get to 100% faster. No reason to care about a gross charging rate, only the net rate has practical use.', ">>{padrepio23} : Trump Started his political ambitions based on this nonsense. I really hope Hillzy and Media talking heads don't let this go.", ">>{thexfiles81} : > Fascism is not be debated, it is to be destroyed. I don't know if you were trying to be ironic or not but that sounds like a pretty fascist statement to me.", ">>{fhjkgk} : I guess. But I'd think the using less = quicker recharge would be obvious, so the only clarification needed would be if it would trigger some sort of quick charging (my first thought when told airplane mode charges faster, but turns out it doesn't :/)", '>>{antisoshal} : you ignored the s on that word. Ive been following the whole campaign. MOST of it is complete bullshit, but im ignoring that and simply conceding it happened the way you think since you already believe that. Ive also been watching the right (of which I am a former member) turn into a patron of racial and ethnic tension and utter stupidity. The violence perpetrated on a routine basis in the name of issues the right created for itself makes the violence at Trump rallies look like kids on a playground. It doesn\'t justify it, but if I were to prioritize what needs fixing first, acting like Trump supporters will be exterminated if it doesn\'t stop is the silly bleating of people desperate to complain about anything they can. Then when you blame it on "The left" like its a halmark of the movement and not just a few assholes fed up with the fact that an orange con man is poised to crap on the country, it loses any legitimacy it might have. If you were calling for an end to violence in general id be right by your side. Demanding that those violent leftists be held accountable makes you sound ridiculous. How many people have been killed this election cycle by violent "right" criminals? lets see, you have the church. The planned parenthood attack... seriously. trying to paint the "left" as a violent ideology is hysterical. You might think it helps your cause. It makes you easier to summarily dismiss as hyperbole.', '>>{ontopic} : The FORMAT of this SUBMISSION TITLE makes me think this VIDEO is BULLSHIT', ">>{madrigal50} : The technical answer... I don't know, but it seems to do so for me.", ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : Why is it insane? Every system is broken in some way, you just have to choose which way it breaks. So take voter ID. Let's say voter ID 100% stopped every single instance of in person voter fraud, but at the exact same time it turned legitimately registered voters who forgot their ID and couldn't spare the time to go home and get it, people who lost their photo ID, or people who just don't have photo ID? What's the preferred balance to you, how many legitimate voters are you willing to turn away to catch one fraud? If for every one fraudulent voter, we turn away 10 legit voters, is that ok? What if we turn away 100? 1,000? 10,000? No one is making the argument that in person voter fraud NEVER happens, the argument is that the cure is worse than the disease.", '>>{NoNewsizBadnews} : Does this mean Benghazi is no longer an issue?', '>>{omicronperseiVIII} : Yes, street-brawling with Nazis sure worked out well in Germany.', ">>{grannyinspace} : So you know who casts the votes? An atomic reactor is not a broken system. It is a perfect system, if it wasn't, Chernobyl would happen. Who goes around without ID on them? Maybe you lose an odd voter without shoes in the Midwest, but next year he will remember. I don't care. If you can't bring your ID you aren't fit to vote anyway. Are you sure?", '>>{BuckRowdy} : There has to be a better way to fight Trump. The violence at his rallies just feeds him and fossilizes his support.', ">>{utterlygodless} : [I don't think you know what's coming down the line](http://m.imgur.com/eJXMW1j)", '>>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : Answer the question then. What is your personal tipping point, how many registered voters are you ok with turning away from the polls in order to stop one instance of voter fraud?', ">>{thexfiles81} : Wait, are you calling me liberal? That's about as wrong as you could get. I don't understand how you could think that using fascist tactics to suppress what you believe is fascist speech is ok.", ">>{BadDecisionDino} : What kind of ridiculous logic is this? So things stop being fair game if they're more than 4 years old? I guess we gotta shut up about Hillary's Iraq vote too? Could our two choices be any more awful?", ">>{theRealRedherring} : We still havent seen Drumpf's long form birth-certificate. Dont you think its about time?", ">>{CTR_OWNS_R-POLITICS} : But the tabloid media (CNN) would call him presidential and praise him for apologizing (even if he didn't) and call the race over.", ">>{grannyinspace} : If you can't document who you are, you shouldn't be able to vote. This is normal practice in Europe, and should also be in the US.", ">>{utterlygodless} : [It's](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swingjugend) [better](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Front) [than](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Fascist_Action) [cowering in fear.]( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Heartfield)", '>>{matziegirl} : What about people who were born in a community in the US who never had the means to travel abroad, so no need for a passport, doesnt have a drivers license because its not a luxury they can afford or something they need in their day to day context, and birth certificates etc may have been lost and other means are just unfeasible or severely difficult to obtain? Are you saying these people, are "unfit" to vote and shouldn\'t be allowed to vote? Having precautions are important, but not if it means you actively exclude a whole subset of the population', '>>{grannyinspace} : How about your credit/debit cards? I am from Europe, so not the idea of not having a passport is kind of crazy. How about a national ID card?', '>>{fcuk_trump} : orangutan trump may actually have been born in indonesia, idk thats what some very smart people are saying', '>>{ivsciguy} : You\'ll notice that Woody Guthrie had "This Machine Kills Fascists" on his guitar, not on a gun.', '>>{utterlygodless} : Yeah? You shoud [hear](https://youtu.be/jKVnur5DkdI) what he wrote with it.', ">>{matziegirl} : I too live in Europe and no way do they take credit and debit cards as a form if ID. I remember in first year of uni all of us who didnt have our drivers license yet had to carry our passports around everywhere, and I agree national ID cards should fill that gap for some, but it really isn't an option for some (ie: its not really a thing in NZ, drivers license were peoples main form of ID). And regarding passports, we really are just fortunate to have filed for one and travel, I know a few people in Korea who are well into their 70s who only just filed to get a passport to travel. No ID is a reality for some people, we just dont know because it isn't really our reality - and denying their right to vote because of the circumstances in their life that prohibited or made it incredibly difficult to obtain such documents is really unfair", ">>{zacdenver} : ...as in, it's an issue only a four-year-old would believe?", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Trump's toadies have been broadcasting this massaging of the message. Not Trump. Not the actual candidate for nation's highest office.", ">>{grannyinspace} : They do if you have picture on them? That a few poor souls wouldn't be able to vote is a lot smaller problem, than being able to vote without ID. How do you know that someone hasn't votes 10 times? Also that illegal immigrants can vote is a disgrace. To vote one have to be a citizen with ID. Full stop.", ">>{antisoshal} : Thankyou for demonstrating my point better than I could Can I call on you later to provide examples of what I'm referring to> You do it better than me.", ">>{AgoraiosBum} : But there's so much other nonsense involving Trump out there...it's hard to keep up with it all.", ">>{crackedup1979} : > This is normal practice in Europe, and should also be in the US. LOL, we don't give a fuck what you Europeans do.", '>>{humanhumannukanuka} : Mayor of San Jose blamed the victims > “Our police officers have done an extremely courageous and professional job so far,” San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo told the Associated Press by phone. “We’re all still holding our breath to see the outcome of this dangerous and explosive situation.” > The mayor, a Democrat and Hillary Clinton supporter, criticized Trump for coming to cities and igniting problems that local police departments have to deal with. > “At some point Donald Trump needs to take responsibility for the irresponsible behavior of his campaign,” Liccardo said. http://hotair.com/archives/2016/06/03/angry-leftist-mob-physically-attack-trump-supporters-outside-california-rally/', '>>{shazer1987} : I agree the violence in general needs to stop, but I do wonder how long after sanders drops out it will take for them to be recognized as radicals instead of sanders supporters 90% of the time.', '>>{padrepio23} : So they need to hammer this point to encapsulate how bad of a candidate Trump really is. Him being a birther guy demonstrates why her Friday comments were simply off by about 15%.', ">>{Wrym} : What a tool. I'm no fan of Trump but these people are responsible for their actions.", '>>{qqaaxs} : re: "More people get beaten in a Chicago weekend for simply being black" Black-on-black violence does not contribute to the racist narrative.', '>>{dbSterling} : I\'m about to tap out of politics for a while. I just can\'t stand the glaring hypocrisy or the people pretending these candidates are remotely comparable. Even their standards are on completely different levels. Trump makes a racist tirade against a sitting president. He promised his guys found something "really good", and after all that nonsense and hate-filled speech we\'re just supposed to forget about it? The only reason Trump is on the GOP ticket is because of his birtherism and the nativism that spawned behind it. I just can\'t stand this political season anymore. Its been over a year of being actively engaged, and I\'ve had enough. I knew who I was voting for back when Bernie lost', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : That happened like 2-4 times at most, whereas every week Trump supporters are beaten up. This is just from the past week. * [Multiple Trump supporters chased down and beaten by mob as MSNBC watches](http://www.snappytv.com/tc/2071983/1017585) * [They\'re chasing down and attacking CHILDREN](https://twitter.com/TomLlamasABC/status/738603331258454016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) * [Here they are cornering a woman and pelting her with eggs while calling her a bitch and waving Mexican flags in her face](https://twitter.com/JimmyPrinceton/status/738581044983533569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) [Women sucker punched and chased down alleys by illegal immegrants](http://government.northcrane.com/2016-election/san-jose-trump-rally-attacks/) * [Trump supporter assaulted, one of dozens from across San Jose](https://mobile.twitter.com/marcusdipaola/status/738572899808743424) * [Trump supporter beaten in head with bag if rocks unprovoked in San Jose](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmBXNE8gZvI) **"I bet they aren\'t even Bernie supporters"** [Bernie supporters beat up what they think is a Trump supporter while chanting "Bernie Bernie bernie" until one of the protestors says "No he\'s one of us" and then he gets up and joins them chanting bernie](https://mobile.twitter.com/DefendWallSt/status/738574855206010880)', ">>{Literally_A_Shill} : The problem is that he claimed an elite team of investigators found the truth in Hawaii. So it's still very much an open issue until he tells us what they found.", '>>{Trump-Tzu} : Lol the left is so retarded, always calling their opponents buzzword stop justify their violence. Imagine if Trump supporters were bludgeoning Bernie or supporters in the streets because they must stop "communism"?', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : Yes thousands of people were paid, that makes total sense /s', ">>{miked983} : >Sorry, who is excusing violence against Trump supporters? [Well, there's this for starters.](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-benn/sorry-liberals-a-violent-_b_10316186.html) E: [And this.](http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/06/03/donald-trump-san-jose-violence-mayor-sam-liccardo/)", '>>{Trump-Tzu} : * [Multiple Trump supporters chased down and beaten by mob as MSNBC watches](http://www.snappytv.com/tc/2071983/1017585) * [They\'re chasing down and attacking CHILDREN](https://twitter.com/TomLlamasABC/status/738603331258454016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) * [Here they are cornering a woman and pelting her with eggs while calling her a bitch and waving Mexican flags in her face](https://twitter.com/JimmyPrinceton/status/738581044983533569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) [Women sucker punched and chased down alleys by illegal immegrants](http://government.northcrane.com/2016-election/san-jose-trump-rally-attacks/) * [Trump supporter assaulted, one of dozens from across San Jose](https://mobile.twitter.com/marcusdipaola/status/738572899808743424) * [Trump supporter beaten in head with bag if rocks unprovoked in San Jose](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmBXNE8gZvI) [Bernie supporters beat up what they think is a Trump supporter while chanting "Bernie Bernie bernie" until one of the protestors says "No he\'s one of us" and then he gets up and joins them chanting bernie](https://mobile.twitter.com/DefendWallSt/status/738574855206010880)', '>>{Literally_A_Shill} : Trump supporters are still bringing up out of context quotes Hillary apologized for decades ago.', ">>{utterlygodless} : You're complaining about eggs and flag football tackles, meanwhile: http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/20/politics/donald-trump-immigration-boston-beating/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/14/trump-trump-trump-yells-attacker-as-he-beats-hispanic-man-muslim-student/ Violence by the oppressed is not equal to the violence of the oppressor. and the fascist figurehead agrees with their violence.", ">>{Literally_A_Shill} : Actually, Trump specifically stated that Pence was allowed to support the Iraq war while Hillary wasn't. Because reasons.", ">>{trump_finna_do_it} : No. You can't find his ideas. They're what the people want. So what you have to do is call him racist and riot.", ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : So it's ok to reach back to the 90s for rehashed scandals, but four years ago is off limits?", '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : It\'s funny because the Iraq war vote was in 2003 and that keeps coming up. And so does the "super predator" term from the 1990\'s. Nice try Pence, but Trump can (and should) be held accountable for comments he has made going back many years.', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : No my videos show people being beaten in the streets, sucker punched, attacked with deadly force.', '>>{bmalph182} : I\'m getting to that point too. The guy who deliberately fomented racist sentiment against the first black President of a country that is still recovering from being cleaved in half over slavery wants everyone to forget about it? "You won\'t believe what my investigators are finding!" He hasn\'t stopped shitting his bigoted, ignorant excrement all across the country ever since, and yet we\'re still forced to read about fucking emails for a year and a half because "hey, gotta be impartial here fellas." Edit: Went a bit far there. Hopefully ninja.', ">>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : To me personally...Pence is one of the scariest parts of the Trump admin. If Trump dies, we will have a hard right establishment Republican who we know is already very comfortable with corporate interests. Trump is kind of a moronic wild card, but Pence would play right into mcconnel and ryan's hands. We would be a hard right nation for a while.", '>>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : He also said he would release his tax returns when Obama releases his birth certificate. Still waiting Donnie.', ">>{S_Bek} : notice how none of these riots start in states that have decent CCW laws? pussy leftists know where to find the weakest prey. Hope they don't think this will work in Believeland this July. 8-)", '>>{DaleKerbal} : Has Trump apologized for spreading absurd slanderous racist rumors about our sitting president? No? Then it is still a fair game issue. I hope he is asked about it in the formal debates.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{11097} : Pence: We're Not Talking About Trump's Birtherism, It's A '4-Year-Old Issue'", '>>{JumpingJazzJam} : So it should be easy for Donald Trump to tell the people of the U.S.A. that yes, our President Obama was born in the U.S.A. Easy, but even as a candidate, the Republican Party candidate for President of all the people of the U.S.A., he refuses.', '>>{mt_weather} : I mean, we tried to ask David "I\'m too pussy to finish an AMA on reddit for fake internet points" Brock, but he ditched out...', ">>{padrepio23} : Trump Started his political ambitions based on this nonsense. I really hope Hillzy and Media talking heads don't let this go.", '>>{NoNewsizBadnews} : Does this mean Benghazi is no longer an issue?', ">>{BadDecisionDino} : What kind of ridiculous logic is this? So things stop being fair game if they're more than 4 years old? I guess we gotta shut up about Hillary's Iraq vote too? Could our two choices be any more awful?", ">>{theRealRedherring} : We still havent seen Drumpf's long form birth-certificate. Dont you think its about time?", ">>{CTR_OWNS_R-POLITICS} : But the tabloid media (CNN) would call him presidential and praise him for apologizing (even if he didn't) and call the race over.", '>>{fcuk_trump} : orangutan trump may actually have been born in indonesia, idk thats what some very smart people are saying', ">>{zacdenver} : ...as in, it's an issue only a four-year-old would believe?", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Trump's toadies have been broadcasting this massaging of the message. Not Trump. Not the actual candidate for nation's highest office.", ">>{AgoraiosBum} : But there's so much other nonsense involving Trump out there...it's hard to keep up with it all.", '>>{padrepio23} : So they need to hammer this point to encapsulate how bad of a candidate Trump really is. Him being a birther guy demonstrates why her Friday comments were simply off by about 15%.', '>>{dbSterling} : I\'m about to tap out of politics for a while. I just can\'t stand the glaring hypocrisy or the people pretending these candidates are remotely comparable. Even their standards are on completely different levels. Trump makes a racist tirade against a sitting president. He promised his guys found something "really good", and after all that nonsense and hate-filled speech we\'re just supposed to forget about it? The only reason Trump is on the GOP ticket is because of his birtherism and the nativism that spawned behind it. I just can\'t stand this political season anymore. Its been over a year of being actively engaged, and I\'ve had enough. I knew who I was voting for back when Bernie lost', ">>{Literally_A_Shill} : The problem is that he claimed an elite team of investigators found the truth in Hawaii. So it's still very much an open issue until he tells us what they found.", '>>{Literally_A_Shill} : Trump supporters are still bringing up out of context quotes Hillary apologized for decades ago.', ">>{Literally_A_Shill} : Actually, Trump specifically stated that Pence was allowed to support the Iraq war while Hillary wasn't. Because reasons.", ">>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : So it's ok to reach back to the 90s for rehashed scandals, but four years ago is off limits?", '>>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : It\'s funny because the Iraq war vote was in 2003 and that keeps coming up. And so does the "super predator" term from the 1990\'s. Nice try Pence, but Trump can (and should) be held accountable for comments he has made going back many years.', '>>{bmalph182} : I\'m getting to that point too. The guy who deliberately fomented racist sentiment against the first black President of a country that is still recovering from being cleaved in half over slavery wants everyone to forget about it? "You won\'t believe what my investigators are finding!" He hasn\'t stopped shitting his bigoted, ignorant excrement all across the country ever since, and yet we\'re still forced to read about fucking emails for a year and a half because "hey, gotta be impartial here fellas." Edit: Went a bit far there. Hopefully ninja.', ">>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : To me personally...Pence is one of the scariest parts of the Trump admin. If Trump dies, we will have a hard right establishment Republican who we know is already very comfortable with corporate interests. Trump is kind of a moronic wild card, but Pence would play right into mcconnel and ryan's hands. We would be a hard right nation for a while.", '>>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : He also said he would release his tax returns when Obama releases his birth certificate. Still waiting Donnie.', '>>{DaleKerbal} : Has Trump apologized for spreading absurd slanderous racist rumors about our sitting president? No? Then it is still a fair game issue. I hope he is asked about it in the formal debates.'], ['>>{WhyMnemosyne} : His supporters just have to stop hiring them, problem over. Yes Trump does get support from conservative PACS or other organizations in various ways that keeps his name as pitiful victim in the news and supports the very openly racist hate campaign of Donald Trump.', '>>{Wrym} : What prominent or even elected member of the left has condoned it?', ">>{BugFix} : Sorry, who is excusing violence against Trump supporters? This is vile, and must stop. It's bad when Trump folks start fights with protesters. It's bad when protesters start fights with Trump folks. Both have happened. Both are equally vile. Stop it, people.", '>>{antisoshal} : Ive lived my entire life watching the "right" excuse violence against a large portion of humanity for a littany of reasons. While I dont condone violence, youll excuse me if I find the premise of the right complaining about the actions of a small number of people on single occasions comedic in the face of right wing inspired and condoned violence, terrorism and hatred. They are both wrong and its a stupid thing to do, but you sound ridiculous acting like a genocide is occurring and you need to be protected from the hoards of raging leftists. More people get beaten in a Chicago weekend for simply being black than have been harmed at all the Trump events. Welcome to reality. You spend ten years spreading hatred and fear, you are gonna get some on your shit. By the way, faking pictures of injured people doesnt help your cause either. Seeing Bruce Campbell call you guys out for that yesterday was hysterical.', ">>{utterlygodless} : Fascism is not be debated, it is to be destroyed. That's what Trump is, a fascist. In the same sense that Pinochet was, as was Franco and Mussolini. He might as well reignite the Bund Organization.", '>>{uwjames} : Or better yet... [Sanders condemns violence at Trump’s San Jose rally](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/03/sanders-condemns-violence-at-trumps-san-jose-rally/)', '>>{Wrym} : As one unapologetically on the left let me add my voice: arrest, prosecute, and jail the violent thugs.', ">>{thexfiles81} : > Fascism is not be debated, it is to be destroyed. I don't know if you were trying to be ironic or not but that sounds like a pretty fascist statement to me.", '>>{antisoshal} : you ignored the s on that word. Ive been following the whole campaign. MOST of it is complete bullshit, but im ignoring that and simply conceding it happened the way you think since you already believe that. Ive also been watching the right (of which I am a former member) turn into a patron of racial and ethnic tension and utter stupidity. The violence perpetrated on a routine basis in the name of issues the right created for itself makes the violence at Trump rallies look like kids on a playground. It doesn\'t justify it, but if I were to prioritize what needs fixing first, acting like Trump supporters will be exterminated if it doesn\'t stop is the silly bleating of people desperate to complain about anything they can. Then when you blame it on "The left" like its a halmark of the movement and not just a few assholes fed up with the fact that an orange con man is poised to crap on the country, it loses any legitimacy it might have. If you were calling for an end to violence in general id be right by your side. Demanding that those violent leftists be held accountable makes you sound ridiculous. How many people have been killed this election cycle by violent "right" criminals? lets see, you have the church. The planned parenthood attack... seriously. trying to paint the "left" as a violent ideology is hysterical. You might think it helps your cause. It makes you easier to summarily dismiss as hyperbole.', '>>{omicronperseiVIII} : Yes, street-brawling with Nazis sure worked out well in Germany.', '>>{BuckRowdy} : There has to be a better way to fight Trump. The violence at his rallies just feeds him and fossilizes his support.', ">>{utterlygodless} : [I don't think you know what's coming down the line](http://m.imgur.com/eJXMW1j)", ">>{thexfiles81} : Wait, are you calling me liberal? That's about as wrong as you could get. I don't understand how you could think that using fascist tactics to suppress what you believe is fascist speech is ok.", ">>{utterlygodless} : [It's](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swingjugend) [better](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Front) [than](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Fascist_Action) [cowering in fear.]( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Heartfield)", '>>{ivsciguy} : You\'ll notice that Woody Guthrie had "This Machine Kills Fascists" on his guitar, not on a gun.', '>>{utterlygodless} : Yeah? You shoud [hear](https://youtu.be/jKVnur5DkdI) what he wrote with it.', ">>{antisoshal} : Thankyou for demonstrating my point better than I could Can I call on you later to provide examples of what I'm referring to> You do it better than me.", '>>{humanhumannukanuka} : Mayor of San Jose blamed the victims > “Our police officers have done an extremely courageous and professional job so far,” San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo told the Associated Press by phone. “We’re all still holding our breath to see the outcome of this dangerous and explosive situation.” > The mayor, a Democrat and Hillary Clinton supporter, criticized Trump for coming to cities and igniting problems that local police departments have to deal with. > “At some point Donald Trump needs to take responsibility for the irresponsible behavior of his campaign,” Liccardo said. http://hotair.com/archives/2016/06/03/angry-leftist-mob-physically-attack-trump-supporters-outside-california-rally/', '>>{shazer1987} : I agree the violence in general needs to stop, but I do wonder how long after sanders drops out it will take for them to be recognized as radicals instead of sanders supporters 90% of the time.', ">>{Wrym} : What a tool. I'm no fan of Trump but these people are responsible for their actions.", '>>{qqaaxs} : re: "More people get beaten in a Chicago weekend for simply being black" Black-on-black violence does not contribute to the racist narrative.', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : That happened like 2-4 times at most, whereas every week Trump supporters are beaten up. This is just from the past week. * [Multiple Trump supporters chased down and beaten by mob as MSNBC watches](http://www.snappytv.com/tc/2071983/1017585) * [They\'re chasing down and attacking CHILDREN](https://twitter.com/TomLlamasABC/status/738603331258454016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) * [Here they are cornering a woman and pelting her with eggs while calling her a bitch and waving Mexican flags in her face](https://twitter.com/JimmyPrinceton/status/738581044983533569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) [Women sucker punched and chased down alleys by illegal immegrants](http://government.northcrane.com/2016-election/san-jose-trump-rally-attacks/) * [Trump supporter assaulted, one of dozens from across San Jose](https://mobile.twitter.com/marcusdipaola/status/738572899808743424) * [Trump supporter beaten in head with bag if rocks unprovoked in San Jose](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmBXNE8gZvI) **"I bet they aren\'t even Bernie supporters"** [Bernie supporters beat up what they think is a Trump supporter while chanting "Bernie Bernie bernie" until one of the protestors says "No he\'s one of us" and then he gets up and joins them chanting bernie](https://mobile.twitter.com/DefendWallSt/status/738574855206010880)', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : Lol the left is so retarded, always calling their opponents buzzword stop justify their violence. Imagine if Trump supporters were bludgeoning Bernie or supporters in the streets because they must stop "communism"?', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : Yes thousands of people were paid, that makes total sense /s', ">>{miked983} : >Sorry, who is excusing violence against Trump supporters? [Well, there's this for starters.](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-benn/sorry-liberals-a-violent-_b_10316186.html) E: [And this.](http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/06/03/donald-trump-san-jose-violence-mayor-sam-liccardo/)", '>>{Trump-Tzu} : * [Multiple Trump supporters chased down and beaten by mob as MSNBC watches](http://www.snappytv.com/tc/2071983/1017585) * [They\'re chasing down and attacking CHILDREN](https://twitter.com/TomLlamasABC/status/738603331258454016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) * [Here they are cornering a woman and pelting her with eggs while calling her a bitch and waving Mexican flags in her face](https://twitter.com/JimmyPrinceton/status/738581044983533569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) [Women sucker punched and chased down alleys by illegal immegrants](http://government.northcrane.com/2016-election/san-jose-trump-rally-attacks/) * [Trump supporter assaulted, one of dozens from across San Jose](https://mobile.twitter.com/marcusdipaola/status/738572899808743424) * [Trump supporter beaten in head with bag if rocks unprovoked in San Jose](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmBXNE8gZvI) [Bernie supporters beat up what they think is a Trump supporter while chanting "Bernie Bernie bernie" until one of the protestors says "No he\'s one of us" and then he gets up and joins them chanting bernie](https://mobile.twitter.com/DefendWallSt/status/738574855206010880)', ">>{utterlygodless} : You're complaining about eggs and flag football tackles, meanwhile: http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/20/politics/donald-trump-immigration-boston-beating/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/14/trump-trump-trump-yells-attacker-as-he-beats-hispanic-man-muslim-student/ Violence by the oppressed is not equal to the violence of the oppressor. and the fascist figurehead agrees with their violence.", ">>{trump_finna_do_it} : No. You can't find his ideas. They're what the people want. So what you have to do is call him racist and riot.", '>>{Trump-Tzu} : No my videos show people being beaten in the streets, sucker punched, attacked with deadly force.', ">>{S_Bek} : notice how none of these riots start in states that have decent CCW laws? pussy leftists know where to find the weakest prey. Hope they don't think this will work in Believeland this July. 8-)"], [">>{nhaling2xhale} : Don't know why you're being down voted, the answer is no, but it's a damn good question!", '>>{ApwnSauce} : this begs question: how much quicker does it charge putting it in OFF mode?', '>>{BleepBloopSon} : You know, when you hold the power button and slide the slider.', ">>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Oh, turning it off? Never heard of it referred to as off mode. But I'd guess it charges a little quicker than a phone on sleep mode and airplane mode.", ">>{montydad5000} : Unless I'm mistaken, even if you turn your phone all the way off, plugging it into a charger will automatically turn it back on. Can you then shut it off while it's charging? I didn't think you could.", ">>{SirCamelman} : Yeah if I need to charge my phone up a bit faster whilst I'm getting ready to go out or something I'll plug it in, then turn it off. Not sure how much faster it actually charges but it usually gets that top up it needs haha", '>>{PM_ME_DICK_PICTURES} : Yes, just turn it off while the charger is plugged in. It only boots up if you plug it in after you turn it off.', ">>{Ceteris__Paribus} : Why not? I thought Low Power Mode worked by reducing the amount of background tasks, such as checking for email, in order to save battery. Putting the phone in low power to charge should mean less battery consumption while it is trying to charge up. Maybe the answer is that the difference is small, but you didn't convince me that the answer is no.", '>>{fhjkgk} : Depends on your definition of charging speed. The rate of charging is technically still the same.', '>>{Ceteris__Paribus} : Yeah, sure, but OP is almost certainly wanting to know wether the phone battery will get to 100% faster. No reason to care about a gross charging rate, only the net rate has practical use.', ">>{fhjkgk} : I guess. But I'd think the using less = quicker recharge would be obvious, so the only clarification needed would be if it would trigger some sort of quick charging (my first thought when told airplane mode charges faster, but turns out it doesn't :/)", ">>{madrigal50} : The technical answer... I don't know, but it seems to do so for me."], [">>{CNegan} : If this is true, they'd of had nothing to lose and everything to gain by releasing the raw video.", '>>{tsenaku} : During this election more people have been caught committing voter fraud in order to report said fraud than actual cases of fraud itself. In 2008 the number of cases of Voter fraud was 86. Voter fraud is a non-issue and additional ID laws make it harder for people to vote specifically people who are poor or lack access to social services (these people tend to vote Democrat)', '>>{woodtick57} : you poor fool...this bullshit has been debunked over and over again. NY does not have same day registration. they would have had to register all those people before hand! did they make several fake IDs for them to register with?!?! idiots will always be taken in by such obvious BS, like you have been...', '>>{Lorenzo_Canyon} : You wish voter fraud would be the reason Trump loses.', ">>{woodtick57} : and voter id at the polls wouldn't have stopped those as they were mostly done by election officials. the best study ever done of voter fraud that ID at the polls would stop showed 11 cases in 11 years nation wide. that is one per year.", '>>{vegan8r} : Why does it say popcorn next to your name?', ">>{tsenaku} : Flairs for the election. There's one for every state but I'm Canadian so I picked popcorn.", ">>{grannyinspace} : Have you seen the video? Your argument is invalid. Also, just because voter fraud isn't uncovered doesn't matter it doesn't happen. That you don't have to show ID in order to vote is insane.", '>>{ontopic} : The FORMAT of this SUBMISSION TITLE makes me think this VIDEO is BULLSHIT', ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : Why is it insane? Every system is broken in some way, you just have to choose which way it breaks. So take voter ID. Let's say voter ID 100% stopped every single instance of in person voter fraud, but at the exact same time it turned legitimately registered voters who forgot their ID and couldn't spare the time to go home and get it, people who lost their photo ID, or people who just don't have photo ID? What's the preferred balance to you, how many legitimate voters are you willing to turn away to catch one fraud? If for every one fraudulent voter, we turn away 10 legit voters, is that ok? What if we turn away 100? 1,000? 10,000? No one is making the argument that in person voter fraud NEVER happens, the argument is that the cure is worse than the disease.", ">>{grannyinspace} : So you know who casts the votes? An atomic reactor is not a broken system. It is a perfect system, if it wasn't, Chernobyl would happen. Who goes around without ID on them? Maybe you lose an odd voter without shoes in the Midwest, but next year he will remember. I don't care. If you can't bring your ID you aren't fit to vote anyway. Are you sure?", '>>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : Answer the question then. What is your personal tipping point, how many registered voters are you ok with turning away from the polls in order to stop one instance of voter fraud?', ">>{grannyinspace} : If you can't document who you are, you shouldn't be able to vote. This is normal practice in Europe, and should also be in the US.", '>>{matziegirl} : What about people who were born in a community in the US who never had the means to travel abroad, so no need for a passport, doesnt have a drivers license because its not a luxury they can afford or something they need in their day to day context, and birth certificates etc may have been lost and other means are just unfeasible or severely difficult to obtain? Are you saying these people, are "unfit" to vote and shouldn\'t be allowed to vote? Having precautions are important, but not if it means you actively exclude a whole subset of the population', '>>{grannyinspace} : How about your credit/debit cards? I am from Europe, so not the idea of not having a passport is kind of crazy. How about a national ID card?', ">>{matziegirl} : I too live in Europe and no way do they take credit and debit cards as a form if ID. I remember in first year of uni all of us who didnt have our drivers license yet had to carry our passports around everywhere, and I agree national ID cards should fill that gap for some, but it really isn't an option for some (ie: its not really a thing in NZ, drivers license were peoples main form of ID). And regarding passports, we really are just fortunate to have filed for one and travel, I know a few people in Korea who are well into their 70s who only just filed to get a passport to travel. No ID is a reality for some people, we just dont know because it isn't really our reality - and denying their right to vote because of the circumstances in their life that prohibited or made it incredibly difficult to obtain such documents is really unfair", ">>{grannyinspace} : They do if you have picture on them? That a few poor souls wouldn't be able to vote is a lot smaller problem, than being able to vote without ID. How do you know that someone hasn't votes 10 times? Also that illegal immigrants can vote is a disgrace. To vote one have to be a citizen with ID. Full stop.", ">>{crackedup1979} : > This is normal practice in Europe, and should also be in the US. LOL, we don't give a fuck what you Europeans do."]]

classify and reply

[">>{drewiepoodle} : Justice Department Begins Rollback Of Transgender Students' Bathroom Rights", '>>{Snakers716} : While it sucks that this could get overturned.... On a list of priorities democrats should be worrying about and contesting... this is at the bottom of the list. Sorry, but it is...', '>>{justanyman1} : **Fuck you.** Protecting the civil rights of our most vulnerable citizens is fucking *never* at the bottom of the list.', '>>{E-rockComment} : Why should LGBTQI* rights be on the bottom of the list? Basic human rights should always be a priority.', '>>{flxtr} : They are bricks in a wall to demonstrate his lies and hypocrisy. If he clearly lied about this what else has he not been truthful about. They keep adding up. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/11/15/donald-trump-will-be-friend-ally-and-advocate-for-lgbt-community.html', '>>{Amy75892} : LG V20 throws down the gauntlet against iPhone 7 (hands-on)', '>>{drewiepoodle} : Yeah, because you dont have to worry about which bathroom to use.', '>>{DpwnShift} : It seems so outdated when headlines compare the newest Android phones to iPhones. Whether you like Apple devices or not, they have about a 14% market-share right now! I would wager that *most* people would stick with their current mobile OS when upgrading, therefore the true competition would be from other manufacturers making Android phones...', ">>{Snakers716} : Stop with the name calling. If people want to waste time over this issue that's fine... We don't have unlimited time and resources to tackle every issue... This one goes to my back burner every single time, and don't you dare say I'm not for basic civil rights bc I am... I'd like for this to happen, but if I was a politician I would be waisting zero hours on this. Sorry Edit: I'm sorry, but I'm curious what other people's priority rankings are if I'm getting slammed for putting this low on mine", ">>{m1a2c2kali} : It should be at the bottom of the list because it really should also be at the bottom of the republicans list. The fact that it's apparently at the top says a lot. You fight your battles as they come up.", '>>{Jacobowen63} : I think LG is being very innovative. Much more so than Samsung and even Apple. And I really like the design of the G5. Will I own one? Probably not. But props to LG.', ">>{admronoc} : Apple dominates the high-end smartphone market. Android (and to some degree even Windows) has really good saturation on the low end markets, which has swelled total ownership in favor of androids. The LG V20 competes directly with the iPhone (7) and sells fractions of the numbers that Apple does in the high end market. Samsung, right now is the only real competitor on the high end smartphone stage. To some degree though you're right. The LG V20 isn't coming after the iPhone. It is trying to fight back against the now dominate Samsung.", '>>{oyctracy} : LG V20 can both support Quick Charge 3.0 and USB C port.', '>>{Whipit} : There are some things I like about this phone but what specifically do you find innovative?', ">>{danger____zone} : > Will I own one? Probably not. That's a bit of an issue with their business plan.", ">>{thewitcher3sucks} : Don't bother. Responding to attacks like that isn't productive. I think you're right as shitty as it is. I just don't see it as important as making sure we're not living in Waterworld in 20 years or that this asshole doesn't nuke somebody. Or the blatantly obvious Russian treason or attempts to undermine our checks or balances. There's no rational argument otherwise. I don't know that it's explicitly true that you can't fight both fights though.", ">>{danger____zone} : >Whether you like Apple devices or not, they have about a 14% market-share right now! OS marketshare isn't particularly meaningful when you're talking about individual devices. The newest iteration of the iPhone remains the best selling device year after year, and it's the standard (along with arguably the Galaxy S/Note line) against which other devices are measured (at least in terms of commercial success). https://www.strategyanalytics.com/strategy-analytics/news/strategy-analytics-press-releases/strategy-analytics-press-release/2016/09/06/strategy-analytics-apple-iphone-6s-was-world's-top-selling-smartphone-in-q2-2016#.V86-CJMrJyp", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : > On a list of priorities democrats should be worrying about and contesting... this is at the bottom of the list. That's bullshit. The more things we can get on that list is more people to join our cause against Trump. Trans rights are human rights. To minimize that is terrible.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > But in the grand scheme of things who gives a fuck where you take a piss and shit. People forced to use the wrong bathroom care.', ">>{residue69} : LG's gotten really good at making phones that fail just outside of the warranty period. I wouldn't consider another LG unless they extended the warranty to two years.", '>>{natty4lyfe} : Gave LG a try with both the g3 and g4. Will never buy an LG phone again...', '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > Fuck you. > Protecting the civil rights of our most vulnerable citizens is fucking never at the bottom of the list. Amen. (I hope the mods don\'t get mad at this, though). But seriously, who the fuck would dismiss this as being unimportant - oh yeah, the transphobic folks. The worst is when people say "I\'d use whatever bathroom they made me". Well fuck you too.', '>>{maxlax02} : What a huge compliment to Apple. The iPhone 7 hasn\'t even been revealed yet and the media is already hyping up "iPhone 7 killers".', ">>{Frostasauruss} : Same here and I've heard that a lot after all the G4 bullshit.", ">>{BaberhamLincoln} : Just curious as to what you didn't like about the g3? I had one for two years and loved it.", ">>{tedsmitts} : It's bizarre. Someone like [Buck Angel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_Angel) walking into the women's restroom is going to cause more panic than someone like [Laverne Cox](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laverne_Cox) using it.", ">>{CrumbBumCrampOn} : Hell no. First they start telling folks where they can and can't use the bathroom in a restaurant. Then it's where they can or can't sit in the restaurant. Then it's what parts of the menu they can order from. Then there's signs on the restaurant door stating who can and who can't eat there. Then it's ads in the paper saying who's allowed to apply for work there. Never give them an inch.", ">>{latestuser} : G4 and V10 looked so nice. This generation is still different compared to all the iclones out there but they don't pack the same visual punch.", ">>{flying_mechanic} : I absolutely loved my g4, it ran like a champ right up until it died last month. Now i have a note 7 and I like it but it hasn't left me with the same indestructible phone feel as my g4.", '>>{TheGreatSilence} : Lol, its the exact opposite of the bridge burners. Its like the wall drowners motto or something.', ">>{Snakers716} : Stop it. Stop it!! Because I said it was lower in my list of priorities =\\= me being transphobic... How you equate the two is beyond me especially considering we would like the same thing? it's just not as big of a priority for me as say the environment, the economy, same sex marriage, etc....Learn to appreciate other points of view, please...", ">>{zolagian} : Can't speak for natty, but myself, my SO and my brother all had G3's. Not one made it past a year and a half in usable condition. Bit of a problem when you are stuck on a 24 month contract as is the norm here in the UK. Also from talking to friends their G4's were no better, so for me never going to LG again (for anything, my LG TV speaker blew within a month of my warranty running out). It's a shame, because on release I do think the G3 was the best Android phone on the market. I'm now very happy with a oneplus 3 out of contract.", ">>{Snakers716} : Thanks, yea I was just saying it was low on my priority list compared to other things (we all do have to make priority lists after all) and I'm getting attacked for it...", ">>{EnaiSiaion} : And it won't happen. People buy Apple phones because of iOS and the ecosystem.", '>>{thesecretpotato69} : I iPhone 6s had better performance than the note 7. And the 7 is here.', '>>{BlankVerse} : So this is one of the first things Jeff Sessions does?!', ">>{M0b1u5} : It's the problem with all phone companies. The days of Good Enough Computing are well and truly at hand. I have a 26 month old HTC One M8. It works perfectly. I have absolutely no plan to replace it. I do not care how good the new phones are, *I do not need one*.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : > If people want to waste time over this issue that's fine Well, it's the Republicans bringing it up and making it a priority. We dont have a choice but to fight back.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : > I just don't see it as important Yeah, go tell that to the trans kid who would rather hold it in than go to the bathroom.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > Because I said it was lower in my list of priorities =\\= me being transphobic... You went on to say how it doesn\'t matter what bathroom people are forced to use. I don\'t have to appreciate your view that basically says trans rights are trivial. "I\'d use a womens room if I had to" is not a viewpoint I care to dignify.', ">>{Drunkyoda5} : Fellow m8 here. It's a good phone, but it's starting to get slow. :(", ">>{Snakers716} : I think you are being very close-minded by not trying to understand my point of view. Compared to other things I think this issue is trivial....That's my opinion, you are entitled to yours. As someone clearly not a fan of Trump (based on your username), you seem to have quite a few similarities in that you don't like to hear opposing viewpoints. Sad.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : > Compared to other things I think this issue is trivial. I'm trans, it's not trivial to me. People are trying to legislate where I can go to pee. I think that there are far more important thing to worry about, but the Republicans have made the bathroom bills a priority. So I dont really have a choice but to fight back.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > Compared to other things I think this issue is trivial....That\'s my opinion, you are entitled to yours. I do understand your point of view. That\'s why I was saying it was wrong. Don\'t confuse someone disagreeing with you strongly with not understanding your viewpoint. I\'m sure I could find some civil right close to your heart to dismiss as "trivial" as well.', ">>{thewitcher3sucks} : Quoting half a sentence? as important AS. And yes. I would tell a trans kid that I don't think something about a bathroom is as important as global warming or the general gutting of our public schools if it comes down to that. Nobody will be using any gendered bathrooms in any schools because there won't be any if Republicans have their way. I'm not arguing that it does come down to that though. I don't think that the democrats have the political capital to really do much about anything currently and should fight for everything equally since it's mostly a show of protest at this point.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : > would tell a trans kid that I don't think something about a bathroom is as important as global warming or the general gutting of our public schools if it comes down to that. Forcing someone to use a different bathroom is wrong. Global warming is a problem. Public school funding is a problem. We can hold all three issues in our head. Again, Republicans have made bathroom bills a priority, since I'm trans, I have no choice but to fight back.", ">>{copypaste_93} : I am currently using the lg g3. I love the buttons on the back of the phone. I don't think i will pick up a new phone untill the camera bumb is gone again.", '>>{CaptainMuffins_} : I also have an m8 (2years now) and idk wtf is wrong with my battery dying at 18% all the time :/', ">>{Methaxetamine} : They pretty much made the smartphone popular. Recently the 5S has a 64bit chip that's still pretty good, the 6S has an SSD controller so the memory is extra fast, and the 7... uhm it comes in black.", ">>{alwayztrippy} : I can't believe there's kids who have already made that life altering choice... Crazy.", ">>{Methaxetamine} : My friend had a G2, and didn't get a G3 because apparently it was worst.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : We dont choose to be trans. I've known since I was 7, my wife's doctor has a patient who is 3.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : And where, pray tell, is the abuse?', ">>{Tueful_PDM} : A three year old isn't capable of making drastic life-altering decisions.", '>>{RingoFreakingStarr} : I love my V10. I looks like they took out the stainless steel bars on the side of the phone for this newer model which is a shame since they have saved my phone from falls.', ">>{Tueful_PDM} : You're inspiring the child to mutilate his or her genitals. The kid will never have the opportunity to live a normal life.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : No medical intervention is performed on pre-pubescent trans children. Right before puberty, hormone blockers are administered to delay puberty until they are old enough to decide whether or not to start hormone replacement therapy. The Endocrine Society does not recommend starting hormone replacement therapy before the age of 16. Therefore, when we talk about treatment for very young children, all that's involved is social transition, which has been shown to be beneficial to their mental health.", ">>{supermandied} : For the US market at least the V10 and V20 are the first phones with high end DACs and Head phone Amps. That's not a huge deal for everyone but its great for ppl like me who own nice headphones that don't work on an iPhone. Even my Grados sound a bit flat on an iPhone. Plus the V20 might have some serious audio recording chops. Which is pretty huge as that's generally the only negative with recording with a phone. That said I would say the 7 is the most innovative product released by apple in a long time. The plus's camera features are very cool and selective focus done right is awesome. But that's all they are really bringing to the table on the hardware side", ">>{drewiepoodle} : The Republicans are the ones pushing the bathroom bills. I'm trans, so I have no choice but to fight back against it. All I want to do is to pee in peace.", ">>{Tueful_PDM} : I'm not sure how you reach the conclusion that grooming a child to pretend to be the opposite gender and pumping them full of hormones, including known carcinogens, leads to long term benefits for their health. Transgendered people are 10x more likely to attempt suicide, so I really don't see how manipulating a toddler into this lifestyle is beneficial in any way.", ">>{Nazck} : 3D touch is handy, apple pay really took off too.. But I guess these aren't true innovations.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : So much false information here, let\'s unpack that bullshit, shall we? >grooming a child to pretend to be the opposite gender [A study found](http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2014/09/02/peds.2013-2958.abstract) that a clinical protocol of a multidisciplinary team with mental health professionals, physicians, and surgeons, including puberty suppression, followed by cross-sex hormones and gender reassignment surgery, provides gender dysphoric youth who seek gender reassignment from early puberty on, the opportunity to develop into well-functioning young adults. Furthermore, [a study with 32 transgender children](http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-01-transgender-kids-gender-identity.html), ages 5 to 12, indicates that the gender identity of these children is deeply held and is not the result of confusion about gender identity or pretense. The study is one of the first to explore gender identity in transgender children using implicit measures that operate outside conscious awareness and are, therefore, less susceptible to modification than self-report measures. [Pausing Puberty with Hormone Blockers May Help Transgender Kids](http://www.livescience.com/50755-transgender-kids-hormone-blocker-puberty.html) [Another study has found](http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2016/02/24/peds.2015-3223) that socially transitioned transgender children who are supported in their gender identity have developmentally normative levels of depression and only minimal elevations in anxiety, suggesting that psychopathology is not inevitable within this group. Especially striking is the comparison with reports of children with GID; socially transitioned transgender children have notably lower rates of internalizing psychopathology than previously reported among children with GID living as their natal sex. >pumping them full of hormones As I have said, no hormones are administered to pre-pubescent children. Children approaching puberty are given hormone blockers to delay puberty up until the time they are old enough to decided for themselves whether or not to start hormone replacement therapy. The Endocrine Society does not recommend the administration of hormone replacement therapy to anyone under the age of 16. >carcinogens Hormones contain no carcinogens. >Transgendered people are 10x more likely to attempt suicide Regarding transition effect on suicide rates: * [Murad, et al., 2010](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19473181): "significant decrease in suicidality post-treatment. The average reduction was from 30 percent pretreatment to 8 percent post treatment. ... A meta-analysis of 28 studies showed that 78 percent of transgender people had improved psychological functioning after treatment." * [UK study](http://www.gires.org.uk/assets/Medpro-Assets/trans_mh_study.pdf): "Suicidal ideation and actual attempts reduced after transition, with 63% thinking about or attempting suicide more before they transitioned and only 3% thinking about or attempting suicide more post-transition. 7% found that this increased during transition, which has implications for the support provided to those undergoing these processes (N=316)." * [De Cuypere, et al., 2006](http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1158136006000491?via=sd&cc=y): Rate of suicide attempts dropped dramatically from 29.3 percent to 5.1 percent after receiving medical and surgical treatment among Dutch patients treated from 1986-2001. * [Dr. Ryan Gorton](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3219066): “In a cross-sectional study of 141 transgender patients, Kuiper and Cohen-Kittenis found that after medical intervention and treatments, suicide fell from 19 percent to zero percent in transgender men and from 24 percent to 6 percent in transgender women.)” * [Lawrence, 2003](http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024086814364) surveyed post-op trans folk: "Participants reported overwhelmingly that they were happy with their SRS results and that SRS had greatly improved the quality of their lives. None reported outright regret and only a few expressed even occasional regret." * [Smith Y, 2005](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15842032): Participants improved on 13 out of 14 mental health measures after receiving treatments.', '>>{Zehardtruth} : Same can be said for your metric of choice, comparing a market where there is basically 2 models to choose from with one where tens if not hundreds of options exist will no doubt tell you the one with less internal competition is more popular. That\'s why we have to look at both how many phones of a certain model are sold, and how many phones with a certain OS are sold. Apple dominates the "buy one model" due to lack of competition within their OS, but over all Android takes a much bigger market share even if it\'s parkas amongst more phones/producers. The latter is a good example of capitalism at its finest, many fight and the best will rise. The former, well, shows how capitalism can be anything but a free (internal) market.', ">>{Schiffy94} : It didn't work in North Carolina, it's not gonna work with the Justice Department. The courts are just gonna keep shooting this crap down. Sessions must be pretty fucking stupid to try something so suicidal right off the bat.", '>>{fwau} : All I know is this: if it ever comes down to the wire and some regressive bathroom ban comes to fruition along with the hilarious amount of enforcement hurtles they will face, I--a cisgender man--will be engaging in some hardcore passive-aggressive trolling of the bathroom guards. I invite you all to join me. "Do you need to check my genitalia, sir? Are you sure? I keep a photo of them handy on my phone just in case you\'re uncomfortable and need to dismiss any suspicions."', ">>{skrosstm} : Glitchy software. Taking the jack out and accidentally balsting music in the tram is very embarrassing. Happened few time for no good reason. When i put in headphones, idiotic software trys to determine if it's a headphone, mic out headphone or line out. Usually gets it wrong and for some reason changes the song with your everymove if it's anything other than a headphone. Plastic structure. Clips brake and cover won't staty. No sodtware updates. Laser focus starched and keeps going out of focus because of that for no other reason. Plastic chassis cracked and lines on the corners. (partially not looking after it well so kinda my fault.) Apps are never optimised for lg. Every device has it's problems. But these little things count big time. When i unplug my 5 year old ipod, i KNOW it will not blast the song to the whole tram", ">>{baldmannbob} : Your really messed up if you believe 3 year Olds should be allowed Trans decisions. Boys wear skirts and put on mommy's makeup to be funny, just like little girls will go play in the mud and wear camo. It's part of being a kid. The whole transgender thing has been blown way out of proportion.", ">>{Tueful_PDM} : Estrogen is the known carcinogen. About 4% of the general population attempts suicide while 41% of transgendered attempt suicide. Also, who are you trying to convince that this is a good idea? You can cherry pick studies to support your twisted logic all day, but it will still be impossible to change genders. I understand that you're probably past the point of no return, but you really shouldn't push your mental illness on toddlers.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : Did you not read the part where I said that no medical intervention is performed on pre-pubescent trans children? For the kids who "grow out" of it, fine, no harm no foul. But not letting children transition socially has shown to be detrimental to trans children\'s mental health.', ">>{_Middlefinger_} : In reality, while a single iPhone may outsell any 'single' Samsung, the entire Samsung line is basically the same. In effect the S7, S7 edge and Note 7 are the same device with minor variations. Even the lower ones have essentially the same functions and software.", ">>{_Middlefinger_} : 'High end' is a matter of opinion. The Galaxy S variations are every bit as high end as the iPhone, and between them match the sales. Saying the iPhone 'dominates' is excessive at best.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : > Estrogen is the known carcinogen A recent analysis of data from the Nurses’ Health Study, which has been following more than 116,000 female nurses who were 24 to 43 years old when they enrolled in the study in 1989, found that the participants who used oral contraceptives had a **slight increase** in breast cancer risk. However, nearly all of the increased risk was seen among women who took a specific type of oral contraceptive, a “triphasic” pill, in which the dose of hormones is changed in three stages over the course of a woman’s monthly cycle. >41% of transgendered attempt suicide. Due to the social stigma, not the gender dysphoria. Transitioning has been showing to reduce mental distress. * [Murad, et al., 2010](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19473181): "significant decrease in suicidality post-treatment. The average reduction was from 30 percent pretreatment to 8 percent post treatment. ... A meta-analysis of 28 studies showed that 78 percent of transgender people had improved psychological functioning after treatment." * [UK study](http://www.gires.org.uk/assets/Medpro-Assets/trans_mh_study.pdf): "Suicidal ideation and actual attempts reduced after transition, with 63% thinking about or attempting suicide more before they transitioned and only 3% thinking about or attempting suicide more post-transition. 7% found that this increased during transition, which has implications for the support provided to those undergoing these processes (N=316)." * [De Cuypere, et al., 2006](http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1158136006000491?via=sd&cc=y): Rate of suicide attempts dropped dramatically from 29.3 percent to 5.1 percent after receiving medical and surgical treatment among Dutch patients treated from 1986-2001. * [Dr. Ryan Gorton](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3219066): “In a cross-sectional study of 141 transgender patients, Kuiper and Cohen-Kittenis found that after medical intervention and treatments, suicide fell from 19 percent to zero percent in transgender men and from 24 percent to 6 percent in transgender women.)” * [Lawrence, 2003](http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024086814364) surveyed post-op trans folk: "Participants reported overwhelmingly that they were happy with their SRS results and that SRS had greatly improved the quality of their lives. None reported outright regret and only a few expressed even occasional regret." * [Smith Y, 2005](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15842032): Participants improved on 13 out of 14 mental health measures after receiving treatments.', '>>{_Middlefinger_} : Horrible washed out screen that had fake and obvious sharpening effect (and was well documented and debated), it was also a bit laggy to say the least. It was actually slower than the G2, which I really liked.', '>>{Tueful_PDM} : Well, around 20% regret their transition, 40% attempt suicide, and 60% suffer from some form of mental illness and this is the path that you want for toddlers? These children need to receive mental healthcare, not people to promote and enable mental illness.', ">>{LogicChick} : I don't think anyone was telling anyone things until recently, when everyone was told. The point of this action is to stop going to court over it, right?", '>>{_Middlefinger_} : Its so stupid. To me even a $50 android would kill an iPhone because i hate iOS. Its all meaningless.', '>>{_Middlefinger_} : In what way? Meaningless benchmarks? I find even the S6 WAY faster in real use than than the 6S because it has much much faster storage. A few FPS in a game that you cant even see means nothing.', ">>{thesecretpotato69} : How much is a WAY, sorry I can't take that seriously. also the s6 is the worst phone I've ever owned. Laggy,shitty battery, touchwiz", '>>{_Middlefinger_} : The newest Galaxy S (from 6 onwards) use UFS 2.0 storage, rather than emmc. Its up to 3x faster. My S6 edge + has no lag at all. If you dont like TW then use a different launcher. The rest of TW that you encounter (such as in menus) is basically the same as stock, more so if you use a theme. On Marshmallow the S6 is completely smooth.', ">>{cchum} : I'm curious to know how this will record videos/audio in loud environments I.e concerts, festivals, clubs etc. iPhone does a great job capturing audio in these environments with no distortion. I'm not sure how the new samsungs perform. But if this is good as LG says I hope it does well", '>>{JPN2214} : Not sure what you mean by "even Apple". It has been accepted for a while that Apple doesn\'t specialize in hardware innovation. They have some neat features from time to time, but they have never been the top.', '>>{JPN2214} : I think Xperias have had high end DACs for a while.', ">>{Javalina_poptart} : My wife's m8 does the exact thing. Sometimes when the battery is as high as 40% Often crashes, and she has to start all over at level one of Bubble Witch! I have the m9, no issues, been pretty durable.", ">>{happlepaff} : Why is that? I am typing this on my g4 right now and i couldn't be happier. Contract was about 10 quid per month cheaper than the s6, as well", ">>{Nazck} : See I can't think of an innovative phone, as in a photographs with a brand new concept and technology..", '>>{TerryTheGnome} : Like others have said, we\'re in a time where good enough is ubiquitous. A $400 phone is 80% as good as a phone twice its price (i.e. a medium specced iPhone). Apple and android both have payment protocols. 3D Touch will be useful depending on how much you want to use it -- I find it useful for bringing up link opening options and moving the cursor. Mundane, sure, but helpful. I think phone "innovation" is going to approach a point where the difference between the best and the third or fourth best is predominantly branding, not function. Think about the cameras of the iPhone and nexus 5x/6p. 12 MP shooters, similar performance, 4K, RAW (android first and hopefully for pre-7 iPhones via iOS 10). It\'s all the same shit. Now the 7plus has a standard and wide angle camera just like the LG G5. Innovation is no longer felt on a year by year basis. It\'s month by month. Novelty itself wears off and "innovation" is just a marketing term.', ">>{TerryTheGnome} : But one thing innovation ISN'T? Taking away options for consumers. Taking away a perfectly functional hardware standard that requires no extra proprietary bullshit. For what? Better water resistance? The Galaxy S7 has higher ingress protection and a 3.5mm jack. Just saying, it can be done. This is just reinventing the wheel by adding corners. Fuck me, I just realized this isn't an iPhone 7 thread. Whoops.", ">>{John-Carlton-King} : They also build the most dependable phones I've ever owned. I'm clumsy as hell, and even my LGs last 2+ years.", '>>{John-Carlton-King} : Even as someone who refuses to buy their gear, the build quality and polish are impressive as hell.', ">>{Pos7al} : I loved my LG, amd hated it's resale value. Had to roll with Galaxy phones to make my frequent changes close to a wash. Look forward ro seeing how these stack up in the long run.", ">>{p_giguere1} : While they're clearly not leading mobile tech like they used to in 2007-2010, I'd say they're still pulling out at least as much hardware innovation as their competitors. Examples of hardware tech they introduced or were early to adopt in the last few years: * Touch ID (fingerprint sensor that doesn't suck) * 3D Touch (accurate pressure-sensitive screens) * Taptic Engine (very precise and customizable haptic feedback) * Motion coprocessors (low-energy always-on processing of various sensors) * Secure enclave (on-chip encrypted storage not accessible by software) * True Tone flash (flash that adapt its color temperature to match ambient light) * True Tone display (display that adapt its color temperature to match ambient light) * Two-camera system that elegantly simulates an optical zoom * Apple Pencil (stylus that feels the most natural compared to a real pencil) They also design industry-leading custom ARM CPUs, ISPs and NVMe storage controllers. Meanwhile Android phones have lots of hardware features the iPhone doesn't have, but you can't attribute a lot of them to a single manufacturer.", ">>{p_giguere1} : It's 14% worldwide because of developing markets buying billions of cheap phones. If we stick to the US where more high-end phones are sold (because that's what we are comparing here), then the numbers are completely different: * Apple 43% * Samsung 28% * LG 10% * Motorola 5% * HTC 3% https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings/comScore-Reports-February-2016-US-Smartphone-Subscriber-Market-Share And those are all phones sold in the US, not just the premium ones. If only premium phones were measured (again, because that's what we're comparing here. No point comparing flagships to budget phones) Apple would likely have at lest 60% market share, since that's all they sell. They are still the leading premium smartphone manufacturer by quite a good margin. Counting cheap smartphones sold in India/China doesn't change that.", '>>{Cousin_Oliver} : I, too, own a V10, but have had the opposite experience. The rounded steel bars made my phone a lot harder to hold than my previous HTC One M8. Granted, the V10 is a larger device.', '>>{shamwow19} : An intresting fact. If u use american express to buy any electronic. American express extends ur warranty by 1 year. You will have to go thru amex for replacement though.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{drewiepoodle} : Justice Department Begins Rollback Of Transgender Students' Bathroom Rights", '>>{Snakers716} : While it sucks that this could get overturned.... On a list of priorities democrats should be worrying about and contesting... this is at the bottom of the list. Sorry, but it is...', '>>{justanyman1} : **Fuck you.** Protecting the civil rights of our most vulnerable citizens is fucking *never* at the bottom of the list.', '>>{E-rockComment} : Why should LGBTQI* rights be on the bottom of the list? Basic human rights should always be a priority.', '>>{flxtr} : They are bricks in a wall to demonstrate his lies and hypocrisy. If he clearly lied about this what else has he not been truthful about. They keep adding up. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/11/15/donald-trump-will-be-friend-ally-and-advocate-for-lgbt-community.html', '>>{drewiepoodle} : Yeah, because you dont have to worry about which bathroom to use.', ">>{Snakers716} : Stop with the name calling. If people want to waste time over this issue that's fine... We don't have unlimited time and resources to tackle every issue... This one goes to my back burner every single time, and don't you dare say I'm not for basic civil rights bc I am... I'd like for this to happen, but if I was a politician I would be waisting zero hours on this. Sorry Edit: I'm sorry, but I'm curious what other people's priority rankings are if I'm getting slammed for putting this low on mine", ">>{m1a2c2kali} : It should be at the bottom of the list because it really should also be at the bottom of the republicans list. The fact that it's apparently at the top says a lot. You fight your battles as they come up.", ">>{thewitcher3sucks} : Don't bother. Responding to attacks like that isn't productive. I think you're right as shitty as it is. I just don't see it as important as making sure we're not living in Waterworld in 20 years or that this asshole doesn't nuke somebody. Or the blatantly obvious Russian treason or attempts to undermine our checks or balances. There's no rational argument otherwise. I don't know that it's explicitly true that you can't fight both fights though.", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : > On a list of priorities democrats should be worrying about and contesting... this is at the bottom of the list. That's bullshit. The more things we can get on that list is more people to join our cause against Trump. Trans rights are human rights. To minimize that is terrible.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > But in the grand scheme of things who gives a fuck where you take a piss and shit. People forced to use the wrong bathroom care.', '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > Fuck you. > Protecting the civil rights of our most vulnerable citizens is fucking never at the bottom of the list. Amen. (I hope the mods don\'t get mad at this, though). But seriously, who the fuck would dismiss this as being unimportant - oh yeah, the transphobic folks. The worst is when people say "I\'d use whatever bathroom they made me". Well fuck you too.', ">>{tedsmitts} : It's bizarre. Someone like [Buck Angel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_Angel) walking into the women's restroom is going to cause more panic than someone like [Laverne Cox](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laverne_Cox) using it.", ">>{CrumbBumCrampOn} : Hell no. First they start telling folks where they can and can't use the bathroom in a restaurant. Then it's where they can or can't sit in the restaurant. Then it's what parts of the menu they can order from. Then there's signs on the restaurant door stating who can and who can't eat there. Then it's ads in the paper saying who's allowed to apply for work there. Never give them an inch.", '>>{TheGreatSilence} : Lol, its the exact opposite of the bridge burners. Its like the wall drowners motto or something.', ">>{Snakers716} : Stop it. Stop it!! Because I said it was lower in my list of priorities =\\= me being transphobic... How you equate the two is beyond me especially considering we would like the same thing? it's just not as big of a priority for me as say the environment, the economy, same sex marriage, etc....Learn to appreciate other points of view, please...", ">>{Snakers716} : Thanks, yea I was just saying it was low on my priority list compared to other things (we all do have to make priority lists after all) and I'm getting attacked for it...", '>>{BlankVerse} : So this is one of the first things Jeff Sessions does?!', ">>{drewiepoodle} : > If people want to waste time over this issue that's fine Well, it's the Republicans bringing it up and making it a priority. We dont have a choice but to fight back.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : > I just don't see it as important Yeah, go tell that to the trans kid who would rather hold it in than go to the bathroom.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > Because I said it was lower in my list of priorities =\\= me being transphobic... You went on to say how it doesn\'t matter what bathroom people are forced to use. I don\'t have to appreciate your view that basically says trans rights are trivial. "I\'d use a womens room if I had to" is not a viewpoint I care to dignify.', ">>{Snakers716} : I think you are being very close-minded by not trying to understand my point of view. Compared to other things I think this issue is trivial....That's my opinion, you are entitled to yours. As someone clearly not a fan of Trump (based on your username), you seem to have quite a few similarities in that you don't like to hear opposing viewpoints. Sad.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : > Compared to other things I think this issue is trivial. I'm trans, it's not trivial to me. People are trying to legislate where I can go to pee. I think that there are far more important thing to worry about, but the Republicans have made the bathroom bills a priority. So I dont really have a choice but to fight back.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : > Compared to other things I think this issue is trivial....That\'s my opinion, you are entitled to yours. I do understand your point of view. That\'s why I was saying it was wrong. Don\'t confuse someone disagreeing with you strongly with not understanding your viewpoint. I\'m sure I could find some civil right close to your heart to dismiss as "trivial" as well.', ">>{thewitcher3sucks} : Quoting half a sentence? as important AS. And yes. I would tell a trans kid that I don't think something about a bathroom is as important as global warming or the general gutting of our public schools if it comes down to that. Nobody will be using any gendered bathrooms in any schools because there won't be any if Republicans have their way. I'm not arguing that it does come down to that though. I don't think that the democrats have the political capital to really do much about anything currently and should fight for everything equally since it's mostly a show of protest at this point.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : > would tell a trans kid that I don't think something about a bathroom is as important as global warming or the general gutting of our public schools if it comes down to that. Forcing someone to use a different bathroom is wrong. Global warming is a problem. Public school funding is a problem. We can hold all three issues in our head. Again, Republicans have made bathroom bills a priority, since I'm trans, I have no choice but to fight back.", ">>{alwayztrippy} : I can't believe there's kids who have already made that life altering choice... Crazy.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : We dont choose to be trans. I've known since I was 7, my wife's doctor has a patient who is 3.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : And where, pray tell, is the abuse?', ">>{Tueful_PDM} : A three year old isn't capable of making drastic life-altering decisions.", ">>{Tueful_PDM} : You're inspiring the child to mutilate his or her genitals. The kid will never have the opportunity to live a normal life.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : No medical intervention is performed on pre-pubescent trans children. Right before puberty, hormone blockers are administered to delay puberty until they are old enough to decide whether or not to start hormone replacement therapy. The Endocrine Society does not recommend starting hormone replacement therapy before the age of 16. Therefore, when we talk about treatment for very young children, all that's involved is social transition, which has been shown to be beneficial to their mental health.", ">>{drewiepoodle} : The Republicans are the ones pushing the bathroom bills. I'm trans, so I have no choice but to fight back against it. All I want to do is to pee in peace.", ">>{Tueful_PDM} : I'm not sure how you reach the conclusion that grooming a child to pretend to be the opposite gender and pumping them full of hormones, including known carcinogens, leads to long term benefits for their health. Transgendered people are 10x more likely to attempt suicide, so I really don't see how manipulating a toddler into this lifestyle is beneficial in any way.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : So much false information here, let\'s unpack that bullshit, shall we? >grooming a child to pretend to be the opposite gender [A study found](http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2014/09/02/peds.2013-2958.abstract) that a clinical protocol of a multidisciplinary team with mental health professionals, physicians, and surgeons, including puberty suppression, followed by cross-sex hormones and gender reassignment surgery, provides gender dysphoric youth who seek gender reassignment from early puberty on, the opportunity to develop into well-functioning young adults. Furthermore, [a study with 32 transgender children](http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-01-transgender-kids-gender-identity.html), ages 5 to 12, indicates that the gender identity of these children is deeply held and is not the result of confusion about gender identity or pretense. The study is one of the first to explore gender identity in transgender children using implicit measures that operate outside conscious awareness and are, therefore, less susceptible to modification than self-report measures. [Pausing Puberty with Hormone Blockers May Help Transgender Kids](http://www.livescience.com/50755-transgender-kids-hormone-blocker-puberty.html) [Another study has found](http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2016/02/24/peds.2015-3223) that socially transitioned transgender children who are supported in their gender identity have developmentally normative levels of depression and only minimal elevations in anxiety, suggesting that psychopathology is not inevitable within this group. Especially striking is the comparison with reports of children with GID; socially transitioned transgender children have notably lower rates of internalizing psychopathology than previously reported among children with GID living as their natal sex. >pumping them full of hormones As I have said, no hormones are administered to pre-pubescent children. Children approaching puberty are given hormone blockers to delay puberty up until the time they are old enough to decided for themselves whether or not to start hormone replacement therapy. The Endocrine Society does not recommend the administration of hormone replacement therapy to anyone under the age of 16. >carcinogens Hormones contain no carcinogens. >Transgendered people are 10x more likely to attempt suicide Regarding transition effect on suicide rates: * [Murad, et al., 2010](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19473181): "significant decrease in suicidality post-treatment. The average reduction was from 30 percent pretreatment to 8 percent post treatment. ... A meta-analysis of 28 studies showed that 78 percent of transgender people had improved psychological functioning after treatment." * [UK study](http://www.gires.org.uk/assets/Medpro-Assets/trans_mh_study.pdf): "Suicidal ideation and actual attempts reduced after transition, with 63% thinking about or attempting suicide more before they transitioned and only 3% thinking about or attempting suicide more post-transition. 7% found that this increased during transition, which has implications for the support provided to those undergoing these processes (N=316)." * [De Cuypere, et al., 2006](http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1158136006000491?via=sd&cc=y): Rate of suicide attempts dropped dramatically from 29.3 percent to 5.1 percent after receiving medical and surgical treatment among Dutch patients treated from 1986-2001. * [Dr. Ryan Gorton](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3219066): “In a cross-sectional study of 141 transgender patients, Kuiper and Cohen-Kittenis found that after medical intervention and treatments, suicide fell from 19 percent to zero percent in transgender men and from 24 percent to 6 percent in transgender women.)” * [Lawrence, 2003](http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024086814364) surveyed post-op trans folk: "Participants reported overwhelmingly that they were happy with their SRS results and that SRS had greatly improved the quality of their lives. None reported outright regret and only a few expressed even occasional regret." * [Smith Y, 2005](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15842032): Participants improved on 13 out of 14 mental health measures after receiving treatments.', ">>{Schiffy94} : It didn't work in North Carolina, it's not gonna work with the Justice Department. The courts are just gonna keep shooting this crap down. Sessions must be pretty fucking stupid to try something so suicidal right off the bat.", '>>{fwau} : All I know is this: if it ever comes down to the wire and some regressive bathroom ban comes to fruition along with the hilarious amount of enforcement hurtles they will face, I--a cisgender man--will be engaging in some hardcore passive-aggressive trolling of the bathroom guards. I invite you all to join me. "Do you need to check my genitalia, sir? Are you sure? I keep a photo of them handy on my phone just in case you\'re uncomfortable and need to dismiss any suspicions."', ">>{baldmannbob} : Your really messed up if you believe 3 year Olds should be allowed Trans decisions. Boys wear skirts and put on mommy's makeup to be funny, just like little girls will go play in the mud and wear camo. It's part of being a kid. The whole transgender thing has been blown way out of proportion.", ">>{Tueful_PDM} : Estrogen is the known carcinogen. About 4% of the general population attempts suicide while 41% of transgendered attempt suicide. Also, who are you trying to convince that this is a good idea? You can cherry pick studies to support your twisted logic all day, but it will still be impossible to change genders. I understand that you're probably past the point of no return, but you really shouldn't push your mental illness on toddlers.", '>>{drewiepoodle} : Did you not read the part where I said that no medical intervention is performed on pre-pubescent trans children? For the kids who "grow out" of it, fine, no harm no foul. But not letting children transition socially has shown to be detrimental to trans children\'s mental health.', '>>{drewiepoodle} : > Estrogen is the known carcinogen A recent analysis of data from the Nurses’ Health Study, which has been following more than 116,000 female nurses who were 24 to 43 years old when they enrolled in the study in 1989, found that the participants who used oral contraceptives had a **slight increase** in breast cancer risk. However, nearly all of the increased risk was seen among women who took a specific type of oral contraceptive, a “triphasic” pill, in which the dose of hormones is changed in three stages over the course of a woman’s monthly cycle. >41% of transgendered attempt suicide. Due to the social stigma, not the gender dysphoria. Transitioning has been showing to reduce mental distress. * [Murad, et al., 2010](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19473181): "significant decrease in suicidality post-treatment. The average reduction was from 30 percent pretreatment to 8 percent post treatment. ... A meta-analysis of 28 studies showed that 78 percent of transgender people had improved psychological functioning after treatment." * [UK study](http://www.gires.org.uk/assets/Medpro-Assets/trans_mh_study.pdf): "Suicidal ideation and actual attempts reduced after transition, with 63% thinking about or attempting suicide more before they transitioned and only 3% thinking about or attempting suicide more post-transition. 7% found that this increased during transition, which has implications for the support provided to those undergoing these processes (N=316)." * [De Cuypere, et al., 2006](http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1158136006000491?via=sd&cc=y): Rate of suicide attempts dropped dramatically from 29.3 percent to 5.1 percent after receiving medical and surgical treatment among Dutch patients treated from 1986-2001. * [Dr. Ryan Gorton](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3219066): “In a cross-sectional study of 141 transgender patients, Kuiper and Cohen-Kittenis found that after medical intervention and treatments, suicide fell from 19 percent to zero percent in transgender men and from 24 percent to 6 percent in transgender women.)” * [Lawrence, 2003](http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024086814364) surveyed post-op trans folk: "Participants reported overwhelmingly that they were happy with their SRS results and that SRS had greatly improved the quality of their lives. None reported outright regret and only a few expressed even occasional regret." * [Smith Y, 2005](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15842032): Participants improved on 13 out of 14 mental health measures after receiving treatments.', '>>{Tueful_PDM} : Well, around 20% regret their transition, 40% attempt suicide, and 60% suffer from some form of mental illness and this is the path that you want for toddlers? These children need to receive mental healthcare, not people to promote and enable mental illness.', ">>{LogicChick} : I don't think anyone was telling anyone things until recently, when everyone was told. The point of this action is to stop going to court over it, right?"], ['>>{Amy75892} : LG V20 throws down the gauntlet against iPhone 7 (hands-on)', '>>{DpwnShift} : It seems so outdated when headlines compare the newest Android phones to iPhones. Whether you like Apple devices or not, they have about a 14% market-share right now! I would wager that *most* people would stick with their current mobile OS when upgrading, therefore the true competition would be from other manufacturers making Android phones...', '>>{Jacobowen63} : I think LG is being very innovative. Much more so than Samsung and even Apple. And I really like the design of the G5. Will I own one? Probably not. But props to LG.', ">>{admronoc} : Apple dominates the high-end smartphone market. Android (and to some degree even Windows) has really good saturation on the low end markets, which has swelled total ownership in favor of androids. The LG V20 competes directly with the iPhone (7) and sells fractions of the numbers that Apple does in the high end market. Samsung, right now is the only real competitor on the high end smartphone stage. To some degree though you're right. The LG V20 isn't coming after the iPhone. It is trying to fight back against the now dominate Samsung.", '>>{oyctracy} : LG V20 can both support Quick Charge 3.0 and USB C port.', '>>{Whipit} : There are some things I like about this phone but what specifically do you find innovative?', ">>{danger____zone} : > Will I own one? Probably not. That's a bit of an issue with their business plan.", ">>{danger____zone} : >Whether you like Apple devices or not, they have about a 14% market-share right now! OS marketshare isn't particularly meaningful when you're talking about individual devices. The newest iteration of the iPhone remains the best selling device year after year, and it's the standard (along with arguably the Galaxy S/Note line) against which other devices are measured (at least in terms of commercial success). https://www.strategyanalytics.com/strategy-analytics/news/strategy-analytics-press-releases/strategy-analytics-press-release/2016/09/06/strategy-analytics-apple-iphone-6s-was-world's-top-selling-smartphone-in-q2-2016#.V86-CJMrJyp", ">>{residue69} : LG's gotten really good at making phones that fail just outside of the warranty period. I wouldn't consider another LG unless they extended the warranty to two years.", '>>{natty4lyfe} : Gave LG a try with both the g3 and g4. Will never buy an LG phone again...', '>>{maxlax02} : What a huge compliment to Apple. The iPhone 7 hasn\'t even been revealed yet and the media is already hyping up "iPhone 7 killers".', ">>{Frostasauruss} : Same here and I've heard that a lot after all the G4 bullshit.", ">>{BaberhamLincoln} : Just curious as to what you didn't like about the g3? I had one for two years and loved it.", ">>{latestuser} : G4 and V10 looked so nice. This generation is still different compared to all the iclones out there but they don't pack the same visual punch.", ">>{flying_mechanic} : I absolutely loved my g4, it ran like a champ right up until it died last month. Now i have a note 7 and I like it but it hasn't left me with the same indestructible phone feel as my g4.", ">>{zolagian} : Can't speak for natty, but myself, my SO and my brother all had G3's. Not one made it past a year and a half in usable condition. Bit of a problem when you are stuck on a 24 month contract as is the norm here in the UK. Also from talking to friends their G4's were no better, so for me never going to LG again (for anything, my LG TV speaker blew within a month of my warranty running out). It's a shame, because on release I do think the G3 was the best Android phone on the market. I'm now very happy with a oneplus 3 out of contract.", ">>{EnaiSiaion} : And it won't happen. People buy Apple phones because of iOS and the ecosystem.", '>>{thesecretpotato69} : I iPhone 6s had better performance than the note 7. And the 7 is here.', ">>{M0b1u5} : It's the problem with all phone companies. The days of Good Enough Computing are well and truly at hand. I have a 26 month old HTC One M8. It works perfectly. I have absolutely no plan to replace it. I do not care how good the new phones are, *I do not need one*.", ">>{Drunkyoda5} : Fellow m8 here. It's a good phone, but it's starting to get slow. :(", ">>{copypaste_93} : I am currently using the lg g3. I love the buttons on the back of the phone. I don't think i will pick up a new phone untill the camera bumb is gone again.", '>>{CaptainMuffins_} : I also have an m8 (2years now) and idk wtf is wrong with my battery dying at 18% all the time :/', ">>{Methaxetamine} : They pretty much made the smartphone popular. Recently the 5S has a 64bit chip that's still pretty good, the 6S has an SSD controller so the memory is extra fast, and the 7... uhm it comes in black.", ">>{Methaxetamine} : My friend had a G2, and didn't get a G3 because apparently it was worst.", '>>{RingoFreakingStarr} : I love my V10. I looks like they took out the stainless steel bars on the side of the phone for this newer model which is a shame since they have saved my phone from falls.', ">>{supermandied} : For the US market at least the V10 and V20 are the first phones with high end DACs and Head phone Amps. That's not a huge deal for everyone but its great for ppl like me who own nice headphones that don't work on an iPhone. Even my Grados sound a bit flat on an iPhone. Plus the V20 might have some serious audio recording chops. Which is pretty huge as that's generally the only negative with recording with a phone. That said I would say the 7 is the most innovative product released by apple in a long time. The plus's camera features are very cool and selective focus done right is awesome. But that's all they are really bringing to the table on the hardware side", ">>{Nazck} : 3D touch is handy, apple pay really took off too.. But I guess these aren't true innovations.", '>>{Zehardtruth} : Same can be said for your metric of choice, comparing a market where there is basically 2 models to choose from with one where tens if not hundreds of options exist will no doubt tell you the one with less internal competition is more popular. That\'s why we have to look at both how many phones of a certain model are sold, and how many phones with a certain OS are sold. Apple dominates the "buy one model" due to lack of competition within their OS, but over all Android takes a much bigger market share even if it\'s parkas amongst more phones/producers. The latter is a good example of capitalism at its finest, many fight and the best will rise. The former, well, shows how capitalism can be anything but a free (internal) market.', ">>{skrosstm} : Glitchy software. Taking the jack out and accidentally balsting music in the tram is very embarrassing. Happened few time for no good reason. When i put in headphones, idiotic software trys to determine if it's a headphone, mic out headphone or line out. Usually gets it wrong and for some reason changes the song with your everymove if it's anything other than a headphone. Plastic structure. Clips brake and cover won't staty. No sodtware updates. Laser focus starched and keeps going out of focus because of that for no other reason. Plastic chassis cracked and lines on the corners. (partially not looking after it well so kinda my fault.) Apps are never optimised for lg. Every device has it's problems. But these little things count big time. When i unplug my 5 year old ipod, i KNOW it will not blast the song to the whole tram", ">>{_Middlefinger_} : In reality, while a single iPhone may outsell any 'single' Samsung, the entire Samsung line is basically the same. In effect the S7, S7 edge and Note 7 are the same device with minor variations. Even the lower ones have essentially the same functions and software.", ">>{_Middlefinger_} : 'High end' is a matter of opinion. The Galaxy S variations are every bit as high end as the iPhone, and between them match the sales. Saying the iPhone 'dominates' is excessive at best.", '>>{_Middlefinger_} : Horrible washed out screen that had fake and obvious sharpening effect (and was well documented and debated), it was also a bit laggy to say the least. It was actually slower than the G2, which I really liked.', '>>{_Middlefinger_} : Its so stupid. To me even a $50 android would kill an iPhone because i hate iOS. Its all meaningless.', '>>{_Middlefinger_} : In what way? Meaningless benchmarks? I find even the S6 WAY faster in real use than than the 6S because it has much much faster storage. A few FPS in a game that you cant even see means nothing.', ">>{thesecretpotato69} : How much is a WAY, sorry I can't take that seriously. also the s6 is the worst phone I've ever owned. Laggy,shitty battery, touchwiz", '>>{_Middlefinger_} : The newest Galaxy S (from 6 onwards) use UFS 2.0 storage, rather than emmc. Its up to 3x faster. My S6 edge + has no lag at all. If you dont like TW then use a different launcher. The rest of TW that you encounter (such as in menus) is basically the same as stock, more so if you use a theme. On Marshmallow the S6 is completely smooth.', ">>{cchum} : I'm curious to know how this will record videos/audio in loud environments I.e concerts, festivals, clubs etc. iPhone does a great job capturing audio in these environments with no distortion. I'm not sure how the new samsungs perform. But if this is good as LG says I hope it does well", '>>{JPN2214} : Not sure what you mean by "even Apple". It has been accepted for a while that Apple doesn\'t specialize in hardware innovation. They have some neat features from time to time, but they have never been the top.', '>>{JPN2214} : I think Xperias have had high end DACs for a while.', ">>{Javalina_poptart} : My wife's m8 does the exact thing. Sometimes when the battery is as high as 40% Often crashes, and she has to start all over at level one of Bubble Witch! I have the m9, no issues, been pretty durable.", ">>{happlepaff} : Why is that? I am typing this on my g4 right now and i couldn't be happier. Contract was about 10 quid per month cheaper than the s6, as well", ">>{Nazck} : See I can't think of an innovative phone, as in a photographs with a brand new concept and technology..", '>>{TerryTheGnome} : Like others have said, we\'re in a time where good enough is ubiquitous. A $400 phone is 80% as good as a phone twice its price (i.e. a medium specced iPhone). Apple and android both have payment protocols. 3D Touch will be useful depending on how much you want to use it -- I find it useful for bringing up link opening options and moving the cursor. Mundane, sure, but helpful. I think phone "innovation" is going to approach a point where the difference between the best and the third or fourth best is predominantly branding, not function. Think about the cameras of the iPhone and nexus 5x/6p. 12 MP shooters, similar performance, 4K, RAW (android first and hopefully for pre-7 iPhones via iOS 10). It\'s all the same shit. Now the 7plus has a standard and wide angle camera just like the LG G5. Innovation is no longer felt on a year by year basis. It\'s month by month. Novelty itself wears off and "innovation" is just a marketing term.', ">>{TerryTheGnome} : But one thing innovation ISN'T? Taking away options for consumers. Taking away a perfectly functional hardware standard that requires no extra proprietary bullshit. For what? Better water resistance? The Galaxy S7 has higher ingress protection and a 3.5mm jack. Just saying, it can be done. This is just reinventing the wheel by adding corners. Fuck me, I just realized this isn't an iPhone 7 thread. Whoops.", ">>{John-Carlton-King} : They also build the most dependable phones I've ever owned. I'm clumsy as hell, and even my LGs last 2+ years.", '>>{John-Carlton-King} : Even as someone who refuses to buy their gear, the build quality and polish are impressive as hell.', ">>{Pos7al} : I loved my LG, amd hated it's resale value. Had to roll with Galaxy phones to make my frequent changes close to a wash. Look forward ro seeing how these stack up in the long run.", ">>{p_giguere1} : While they're clearly not leading mobile tech like they used to in 2007-2010, I'd say they're still pulling out at least as much hardware innovation as their competitors. Examples of hardware tech they introduced or were early to adopt in the last few years: * Touch ID (fingerprint sensor that doesn't suck) * 3D Touch (accurate pressure-sensitive screens) * Taptic Engine (very precise and customizable haptic feedback) * Motion coprocessors (low-energy always-on processing of various sensors) * Secure enclave (on-chip encrypted storage not accessible by software) * True Tone flash (flash that adapt its color temperature to match ambient light) * True Tone display (display that adapt its color temperature to match ambient light) * Two-camera system that elegantly simulates an optical zoom * Apple Pencil (stylus that feels the most natural compared to a real pencil) They also design industry-leading custom ARM CPUs, ISPs and NVMe storage controllers. Meanwhile Android phones have lots of hardware features the iPhone doesn't have, but you can't attribute a lot of them to a single manufacturer.", ">>{p_giguere1} : It's 14% worldwide because of developing markets buying billions of cheap phones. If we stick to the US where more high-end phones are sold (because that's what we are comparing here), then the numbers are completely different: * Apple 43% * Samsung 28% * LG 10% * Motorola 5% * HTC 3% https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings/comScore-Reports-February-2016-US-Smartphone-Subscriber-Market-Share And those are all phones sold in the US, not just the premium ones. If only premium phones were measured (again, because that's what we're comparing here. No point comparing flagships to budget phones) Apple would likely have at lest 60% market share, since that's all they sell. They are still the leading premium smartphone manufacturer by quite a good margin. Counting cheap smartphones sold in India/China doesn't change that.", '>>{Cousin_Oliver} : I, too, own a V10, but have had the opposite experience. The rounded steel bars made my phone a lot harder to hold than my previous HTC One M8. Granted, the V10 is a larger device.', '>>{shamwow19} : An intresting fact. If u use american express to buy any electronic. American express extends ur warranty by 1 year. You will have to go thru amex for replacement though.']]

classify and reply

['>>{brazil201} : For those of you who got your 6S battery replaced for free what did they do?', ">>{Akiramcml} : Hi guys. I just got my new iphone 7 which is my second attempt to use an iphone (My first flopped badly) and i noticed this. When i shoot a video i can find it in my photos app and play it from there. But i can't find it in my videos app. It just isn't there!! Why is this? And is this normal?", '>>{AreWeNotDoinPhrasing} : Just ask them to change the battery and not update of.', '>>{Beezure} : Yes, videos app is for movies or tv shows you load into your library.', '>>{Akiramcml} : Thats what I thought too. I just have to shake off my back the android culture and accept a few facts as a new iphone user..', ">>{blcfla} : I just contacted about my 6s today, they are going to mail me a box to ship it back. Said to backup and take out sim etc and restore it before sending in. They also said they are low on supply so it won't be fixed until around the 10th of December. I asked if they just replace the battery and he said as far as he's aware right now. Guess I'll find out in 2 weeks.", '>>{Hubley} : My serial number was part of the affected bunch, and they offered to replace my battery. They then broke the screen on my phone, so I got a brand new replacement for free.', ">>{Rkziki} : There is a videos album if that's what you're looking for.", ">>{Flux85} : How long did it take? Was all your data intact? I'm gonna do a backup to be safe either way just curious.", '>>{Axelph} : I went to an authorized retailer this Friday. They checked I had the serial number of those affected, diagnosed it but they are waiting for the battery so they kept it until Monday and gave me a loaner until Monday.', ">>{Akiramcml} : I know. Thats what i was talking about. Its the only place i can find them and play them. But why can't i see them in my phone's default videos app??", '>>{big_willy24} : Is there a list somewhere online of the serial numbers affected, or so I need to take it in to an Apple Store or other authorized retailer?', ">>{Azuretower} : The videos app is now renamed as TV. So it's not so confusing anymore.", ">>{bagofquarters} : I would like to know this too. But I have an appointment in 3.5 hours so I'll update my experience.", '>>{bagofquarters} : I was told via Apple live CSR to call the nearest "store" for the affected serial number. I never got around to do it.', ">>{bagofquarters} : I spoke with the genius bar rep and he asked me what happened. Told him the jist that it randomly shuts off at 30-40%. He check the serial number and said it was qualified for a replacement. However, they ran out of batteries to make the repair due to high volume. He said they will email me in 1-2 weeks when they receive more batteries to set up an appointment for the repair. The repair will take 1-2 hours and I will need to come back for it. I am located in New York. Debating if I should factory reset; don't want them snoozing through my phone.", ">>{PsychoTea} : Aslong as you have a passcode you should be fine. I doubt they'd want to look anyway; they could get in alot of shit if the tech's were caught snooping through a customers phone.", ">>{bagofquarters} : Good to know. I would think it's not worth losing a job to. Thanks!", '>>{Akiramcml} : Ok. Now it makes more sense. When will they change the name in tv? With the new update i guess??', ">>{BretticusWins} : You say that, but just recently there was an apple store that got into shit for snooping through customer's devices. Happened here in Australia.", ">>{Azuretower} : It might be, I couldn't remember since I'm on the beta.", ">>{PsychoTea} : Really? I'd hope that's a rare case, I doubt Apple went lightly on the employee(s) which did that. I don't understand why someone would wanna risk their job for the sake of nosing around on someone's phone.", ">>{pluush} : If your region isn't supported, I think the TV app will not replace the Videos app.", '>>{BretticusWins} : It was quite a few employees at the store doing it, a quick google search should find the reports.', '>>{Akiramcml} : Yes. I know.. I google it before. Now I understand.. thank you my friend.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Akiramcml} : Hi guys. I just got my new iphone 7 which is my second attempt to use an iphone (My first flopped badly) and i noticed this. When i shoot a video i can find it in my photos app and play it from there. But i can't find it in my videos app. It just isn't there!! Why is this? And is this normal?", '>>{Beezure} : Yes, videos app is for movies or tv shows you load into your library.', '>>{Akiramcml} : Thats what I thought too. I just have to shake off my back the android culture and accept a few facts as a new iphone user..', ">>{Rkziki} : There is a videos album if that's what you're looking for.", ">>{Akiramcml} : I know. Thats what i was talking about. Its the only place i can find them and play them. But why can't i see them in my phone's default videos app??", ">>{Azuretower} : The videos app is now renamed as TV. So it's not so confusing anymore.", '>>{Akiramcml} : Ok. Now it makes more sense. When will they change the name in tv? With the new update i guess??', ">>{Azuretower} : It might be, I couldn't remember since I'm on the beta.", ">>{pluush} : If your region isn't supported, I think the TV app will not replace the Videos app.", '>>{Akiramcml} : Yes. I know.. I google it before. Now I understand.. thank you my friend.'], ['>>{brazil201} : For those of you who got your 6S battery replaced for free what did they do?', '>>{AreWeNotDoinPhrasing} : Just ask them to change the battery and not update of.', ">>{blcfla} : I just contacted about my 6s today, they are going to mail me a box to ship it back. Said to backup and take out sim etc and restore it before sending in. They also said they are low on supply so it won't be fixed until around the 10th of December. I asked if they just replace the battery and he said as far as he's aware right now. Guess I'll find out in 2 weeks.", '>>{Hubley} : My serial number was part of the affected bunch, and they offered to replace my battery. They then broke the screen on my phone, so I got a brand new replacement for free.', ">>{Flux85} : How long did it take? Was all your data intact? I'm gonna do a backup to be safe either way just curious.", '>>{Axelph} : I went to an authorized retailer this Friday. They checked I had the serial number of those affected, diagnosed it but they are waiting for the battery so they kept it until Monday and gave me a loaner until Monday.', '>>{big_willy24} : Is there a list somewhere online of the serial numbers affected, or so I need to take it in to an Apple Store or other authorized retailer?', ">>{bagofquarters} : I would like to know this too. But I have an appointment in 3.5 hours so I'll update my experience.", '>>{bagofquarters} : I was told via Apple live CSR to call the nearest "store" for the affected serial number. I never got around to do it.', ">>{bagofquarters} : I spoke with the genius bar rep and he asked me what happened. Told him the jist that it randomly shuts off at 30-40%. He check the serial number and said it was qualified for a replacement. However, they ran out of batteries to make the repair due to high volume. He said they will email me in 1-2 weeks when they receive more batteries to set up an appointment for the repair. The repair will take 1-2 hours and I will need to come back for it. I am located in New York. Debating if I should factory reset; don't want them snoozing through my phone.", ">>{PsychoTea} : Aslong as you have a passcode you should be fine. I doubt they'd want to look anyway; they could get in alot of shit if the tech's were caught snooping through a customers phone.", ">>{bagofquarters} : Good to know. I would think it's not worth losing a job to. Thanks!", ">>{BretticusWins} : You say that, but just recently there was an apple store that got into shit for snooping through customer's devices. Happened here in Australia.", ">>{PsychoTea} : Really? I'd hope that's a rare case, I doubt Apple went lightly on the employee(s) which did that. I don't understand why someone would wanna risk their job for the sake of nosing around on someone's phone.", '>>{BretticusWins} : It was quite a few employees at the store doing it, a quick google search should find the reports.']]

classify and reply

[">>{Muh_Condishuns} : I'm a black ex-cop, and this is the real truth about race and policing", '>>{NamelessNinja66} : iPhone 6 "this cable or accessory is not certified" even with apple official charger', ">>{FowelBallz} : From Antarctica to Europe: Women's Marches Around the World", '>>{culiseta} : I think this error has more to do with the lightning cable plugging into the iPhone rather than the charger cube. If use the original white USB to Lightning cable does the error continue?', ">>{Pentafractis} : Wew, lad. More people turned out for the women's marches, myself included (London!) than Donny got for his inauguration. That awkward moment when the silent majority is also fucking invisible. Comin' for ya, Donny. You are not prepared. Edit: Some food for thought, OP. If you get any shitty, snide messages or comments, just remember. Strong women scare weak men. The last time this many women marched on a leader's residence, they brought back Louis XIV in a cage. And more human beings showed up to march in solidarity, for peace, equality and the American way, than they did to celebrate the inauguration of a tiny handed little orange freak. You're on the right side. We all are.", '>>{dont_tread_on_dc} : Polls show that President Trump’s personality is hurting his approval ratings', '>>{moxy801} : Hope this gets lots of upvotes, and excellent article A few interesting quotes: >...About that 15 percent of officers who regularly abuse their power: a major problem is they exert an outsize influence on department culture and find support for their actions from ranking officers and police unions. Chicago is a prime example of this: the city has created a reparations fund for the hundreds of victims who were tortured by former Chicago Police Commander Jon Burge and officers under his command from the 1970s to the early ‘90s. >...The mainstream media helps sustain the narrative of heroism that even corrupt officers take refuge in', ">>{pizzashill} : I'm baffled as to how this even happened. Is America just a stupid country? At what point has Trump ever displayed he's not a delusional mentally ill moron? When did that happen?", ">>{mandrate} : But didn't he said that he leave it as it is when it was open to Florida?", ">>{creek_slam_sit} : Cameo in home alone 2, and that's literally it", ">>{GrandPumba} : You know you've fucked up when even Antarctica is showing up to protest.", ">>{Muh_Condishuns} : I'm not comfortable with 15% of cops being George Zimmerman. *15%*", ">>{moxy801} : Oh please, right now about 80% of all network TV shows are police procedurals or some variation thereof with average citizens needing to rely on some authority figure to 'protect' them from their fellow citizens.", '>>{frankenpuss} : He has a solution: >Every officer in the country should be wearing a body camera that remains activated throughout any interaction they have with the public while on duty. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy for officers when they are on duty and in service to the public. Citizens must also have the right to record police officers as they carry out their public service, provided that they are at a safe distance, based on the circumstances, and not interfering. Witnessing an interaction does not by itself constitute interference. Right there. The cops have no legitimate reason to object.', '>>{RepelGropers} : That was when he wanted people to vote for him.', ">>{FowelBallz} : This. Because even if it is summer down there, it's still cold enough to freeze your nuts off (quite appropriate for a woman's march).", ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : The one where he's a narcissist that his handlers don't know how to adapt to? Yeah, it check's out. Fuck that guy. Also don't eat any steak well done with ketchup. What the fuck??", '>>{vph} : >Fifteen percent of officers will abuse their authority at every opportunity. I am not surprised one bit. Policing is a profession that naturally attracts folks who want power and have trouble controlling their power. This is why we need laws to keep them in check. It is also important to point out that the tendency to abuse power is not necessarily equating to racist behaviors. Yes, if you combine power abuse and racism, then you have an ugly byproduct. Racism is a product of our culture and our education. So, what we need is a set of laws that keep those in power responsible and a culture that encourages openness to different races and cultures.', ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : Yup, we're pretty dumb I think. Plenty of people think he's just this amazing billionaire that knows what the fuck he's talking about and ignores all the signs that's he's an idiot that just inherited his millions and is hiding that to project his image. I don't understand it but it is what is. What the FUCK???", '>>{pegothejerk} : They treat politics like Tinder: "From that staged photo he looks like he knows money and doesn\'t have chlamydia"', '>>{Youdontknowjack900} : They were extra invisible in DC. I walked past the bikers for trump "rally" today, and there were about 20 people.', ">>{Mattallica} : Check to see if there's any lint or debris in your charging port. A toothpick works good but I wouldn't recommend anything metal.", '>>{RepelGropers} : Too late. That opportunity was lost ten days ago.', ">>{Pentafractis} : Music to my ears. It's like hot chicken noodle soup for the heart.", '>>{dajesus77} : That sounds like a reasonable solution, until you realize that even with video evidence, cops are still given the benefit of the doubt. We are told to ignore our lying eyes.', '>>{awkward_pause_} : His twitter history is enough to deem him a complete idiot. What the fuck did you do America? http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/#list-warming', '>>{NamelessNinja66} : yes ive tried 4 different cords all of them official', '>>{GhostOfJebsCampaign} : George Zimmerman was vigilant and protected his neighborhood. He also saved an entire family from a burning SUV. We should want police to be like George Zimmerman.', '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : Another solution: cops should be personally liable for excessive force/abuse of authority, and have to carry malpractice insurance to cover the potential liability. Officers that routinely abuse their authority would become uninsurable (or at least prohibitively expensive to insure) and would no longer be able to work. Plus, taxpayers wouldn\'t be on the hook for paying for their abuses. I would think republicans would love to have such a "market based" approach to the problem (if they can ever get themselves to admit a problem exists).', '>>{RepelGropers} : Never understood why. Keeps people happy and docile.', ">>{Nosnownow} : How so? My best friend was a white police officer working in black neighbourhoods and finally quit because he couldn't deal with the day to day racism and violence against blacks by his fellow officers. Said he quit before he became like them. BTW my community has nowhere near the police violence problem.", ">>{financialanon} : I'm curious what the largest protests in history have been? Surely this is on the list.", '>>{MBAMBA0} : One would think his likely treasonous collusion with Putin would have made more of an impression.', '>>{Watchdog-E-M-} : I love when a "news" site can\'t even afford or don\'t even bother removing the .squarespace.com from their URL', ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : Pretty much. I've heard people in person say well he's a successful businessman so he knows what he's doing. I'm going to vote for him to run the country. I just don't understand and never will. People I'm actually related to and love without question did this and I'm still so baffled.", ">>{Mattallica} : Weird. I hope your charging port isn't bad. I had to replace mine last year on a 5 because of that message and now every cable works fine. I could only get one charger to work and it had to be in a very specific placement, even down to which side of the lightning charger was facing up.", ">>{rwilso7} : The AG doesn't make policy, the White House does. Trump has said little beyond a willingness to leave it up to the states. He could always change his mind, but the people around him probably have bigger fish to fry.", '>>{Sregor_Nevets} : I think he will. Sessions will likely be Trumps attack dog on select issues. That is my hope.', '>>{Trump_kills_your_ass} : considering that hardly any march happened outside of majority white countries, this should be a nice opportunity for the white feminists to recognize their privilege for once', ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : I don't disagree. He's a fucking disgrace. I don't understand how semi competent people decided he was the best choice 4 months ago.", ">>{GrooveTheFusion} : It's an easy-to-grow plant, so it never gets too expensive. As a result, a lot of poor people use it. Keeping it illegal gives you an easy way to harvest a portion of that population at will, and causes the larger portion to always have something to be afraid of that will make them keep their heads down. Making marijuana illegal keeps users in line.", '>>{loucy888} : Is your USB Cable new or old? If use for longtime, maybe port is damaged, so cannot connect well.', '>>{mandrate} : I would imagine if he wants people to beat the fuck out of each other they would still want to vote for him', ">>{Beeftech67} : Didn't we pretty much determine this with the [DOJ report on Ferguson](https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf) last year?", ">>{cakeandbeer} : I don't have a strong opinion either way, but a reason against body cameras to consider is that not every police contact with someone who broke the law results in an arrest. This is because police have discretion on when they arrest or cite, and whether they decide instead to tell people to move along, destroy their drug paraphernalia, or whatever. With body cameras, they would be obligated to follow through every time someone commits an offense, which could be something as trivial as loitering or public urination. Arresting everyone for everything isn't just bad community policing, but bringing someone in and booking them is a huge drain on resources and takes officers away from going after the real criminals. I can easily picture decoys antagonizing cops just to get arrested and distract them from someone committing a serious crime. There are several points throughout the criminal justice process where it seemed like the obvious solution was to limit, for example, judicial discretion, but doing so made the problem worse. Remains to be seen.", '>>{Immolated_Marmoset} : if down at your core, you suck eggs, you can only hide it for so long before people start to notice. And Trump sucks eggs.', '>>{FriesWithThat} : He\'s an asshole and a con man, I thought that *was* his appeal. It\'s not? If voters didn\'t want the "grab them by the pussy", "lock her up", "nasty women", "he might be a Muslim, I don\'t know", "they’re bringing crime. they’re rapists".... guy, then I\'m assuming it wasn\'t because of his warm personality. Either that or they were naive enough to believehe was just going to morph into being presidential after 70-years of spoiled entitlement, as opposed to still being this tantrum throwing baby man.', '>>{cnthwz} : I am using non mfi charger and cables and does not have this problem. I believe your phone has some problems.', '>>{jnr_77} : Last week I said this. Redditors replied "Muh billion dollar industry! Won\'t happen." heh', ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : I'm as baffled as you. I live in a pure red state and did what I could on election day to vote even though it probably didn't matter when I voted against his crazy ass. I did what I could but most people here are just must vote republican party no matter what. UGH.", ">>{GrandPumba} : I'm pretty sure there have been larger protests for localized areas, but as a global event I wouldn't be surprised if this was the largest ever. If there has been a bigger global protest it may have been the anti Iraq war ones.", ">>{rockum} : Trump is utterly repulsive. My theory is that such a kid going to public schools would either be ostracized or get beaten up until he wasn't such a self-centered lying asshole. Trump was sheltered his whole life and so didn't get any feedback on his loathsome personality.", ">>{obstruct_GOP} : The will of the people wants it. So naturally, it won't happen. Trumpettes, are you against freedom, even if Donald seems to be? Or are you completely at his mercy?", '>>{little_green_lamb} : Kenya, India, Thailand, Ghana...etc.', ">>{Gamer9103} : It's only fake news if we don't like it!", '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : How is an article about racial issues with policing not political?', ">>{PathOfDawn} : To be fair, the article is only speculating on the possibility of it happening. There's no concrete evidence yet to suggest they will or won't go after states that have voted on it.", '>>{treyhunna83} : Port going bad sir. Get replaced. Covered under warranty', ">>{siouxsie_siouxv2} : it's political in nature... but not explicitly about US politics. Try /r/news", ">>{i-am-sancho} : Did the people who elected him somehow think he would suddenly grow up once he took office? He's been the same man-child his whole life. He behaved exactly this way during the campaign. Holy fuck people are stupid.", '>>{NSAElectricEye} : He is an extremely intelligent man that knows how to turn this country around. (i.e fix it)', '>>{smutketeer} : If only this sack of human feces was more couth I could go back to Facebook! Or something.', '>>{McInnis7} : I have the same issue too. No lint or debris either. Might have to see what Apple has to say.', ">>{MonkeysOnMyBottom} : >At what point has Trump ever displayed he's not a delusional mentally ill moron? > >When did that happen? I assume he slept at some point", ">>{MeowFood} : I get this once every 6 months on my iPhone. Apple has assured me it is software based, not a hardware issue. Completely restoring factory settings and setting it up as a new iPhone is the only way I can solve this. I'm moving to Android when my contract is up. Rebuilding my phone every 6 months is tedious.", '>>{jnr_77} : I think as long as these "sanctuary cities" cave, Trump will ignore it. But they are playing with fire there.', '>>{whr18} : Lies www.9news.com/mb/news/local/politics/trump-talks-clinton-fracking-marijuana/284425909 He has had some Hard core anti-Mary j advisors and has always said the same thing.', ">>{sgiomlaireached} : OP, it's their [poorly written] website.", ">>{Choopytrags} : SO FUCKING WHAT? Are we going to do something about these assholes or what? Isn't this enough for us to just throw these Republican motherfuckers directly into jail?", '>>{fukdisaccount} : The Kims. Weed is 100% legal in North Korea.', '>>{thetaiyaki} : Good, fucking lazy druggies need to get off their ass.', ">>{aprildismay} : We didn't need a poll to tell us that.", '>>{Watchdog-E-M-} : Well it also seems like OP linked a personal blog, if we are actually going to call that a "news" site, I think I\'m actually done with r/politics >We disallow solicitation of users (petitions, polls, requests for money, etc.), personal blogs, satire, images, social media content (Facebook, twitter, tumblr, LinkedIn, etc.), wikis, memes, and political advertisements.', ">>{Msshadow} : States rights only matter when it's about women and minorities, apparently.", ">>{PathOfDawn} : Interesting, so you think that if Trump at least gets his way on immigration, that he won't bother spending the political capital to tackle marijuana?", ">>{jnr_77} : I think at best he just won't do anything. Which is not as progressive, as say, actually rescheduling Marijuana at the federal level and letting states decide for themselves without being in direct conflict with Federal Law. Trump is for state's rights. But he also gives no fucks about weed so I don't see him really bothering to push for any type of weed-friendly legislation.", '>>{n0xz} : Donnie has the best temperament, especially at 3am. Believe me.', ">>{Higher_Primate} : Wonder if he's going to try and reign in Trudeau too.", '>>{Higher_Primate} : But keeping people doped up also keeps them in line.', ">>{crazyshoelaces} : There's plenty of people who are single-issue voters and saw he was anti-gun control, or anti-abortion, or anti-immigrant and decided that was who they were going to vote for. Single-issue voters are single-handedly one of the most aggravating groups of people in America.", ">>{KarmaPolice911} : That's a personal choice on the part of the user. The government isn't forcing people to be alcoholics by allowing alcohol to be legal, either.", '>>{barjam} : The parts of the country that elected him? Yes. They are statistically of lower intelligence.', ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I don't think Trump personally cares about weed, but members of his Cabinet might.", '>>{xcalibur866} : We all just sat around as our education programming turned into ghosts, Nazis and Hitler conspiracies (history channel), pawn shows (discovery), honey boo boo ( The fucking LEARNING CHANNEL), we have a sizable population who think parodies like "Not another blank movie" or what have you are more than low hanging fruit, one of the most broken modern education systems in the world, and we willingly elected a reality tv star as our most prominent public leader. So yeah, it\'s safe to say as a country, we are dumb. Dumb dumb dumb.', '>>{pollardandsprout} : Who knew that making "80\'s movie bad guy" your prominent personality trait would make you unlikable?', '>>{narrauko} : > just must vote republican party no matter what Honestly, I think this is where most of his votes came from. People who never were going to vote for the Dem whether it was Hillary or somebody else. As long as the -R was after his name, he had their vote.', '>>{narrauko} : And even then the lobby was literally right there. Kinda sad that Kevin even needed to ask.', '>>{pizzashill} : Lower education, not lower intelligence. I know multiple people with advanced degrees that voted for Trump.', ">>{MafiaVsNinja} : Who cares about Trump's feelings. The GOP is in charge on all levels and has always been anti-marijuana. This will continue.", '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : You seriously think Jeff Sessions is going to miss a chance to be a vindictive shit about stuff he looks down on and has fought all his life? He will "enforce the law" with a big smile on his creepy face.', '>>{akaBigWurm} : yeah, they should get off their asses and get hooked on opioids and meth /s', ">>{PathOfDawn} : I definitely agree with all of that. That's the best case scenario. I guess my main concern with Trump is not what his personal feelings are on the issue, but rather is he stupid enough to not care when members of his cabinet take action that will so obviously be bad politics.", '>>{thetaiyaki} : Strong willed people have good jobs because they stay off drugs.', ">>{volares} : Good people don't smoke they drink scotch and beat their wives.", '>>{jnr_77} : There are no consequences for him if he lets them do whatever they want.', ">>{plato1123} : Wasn't ther a study a few years ago that said pot smokers [don't get alzheimers](http://www.esquire.com/lifestyle/health/news/a46593/marijuana-alzheimers-research/)? I can understand why the GOP feels threatened, people with alzheimer's are one of their key support groups.", '>>{Higher_Primate} : None but I know tons of potheads who wont get of their couches to do anything. Sounds like the perfect subject for an authoritarian.', ">>{eatchocolatebehappy} : > None but I know tons of potheads who wont get of their couches to do anything. You sure you're not talking about people w/ pill problems?", '>>{akaBigWurm} : Those people sound boring, I like people with excellent jobs that are not as up tight', '>>{MajorPrune} : > Weed is 100% legal in North Korea. TIL ...only the Sith...', '>>{djskil} : Is every "article" on /politics just some progressive\'s opinion?', ">>{LVenemy} : Weed puts a dent in pharma 'S profit line and keeps prisons full. From an established investor POV it's better if it illegal", '>>{bestbeforeMar91} : Peter Thiel is a big investor in marijuana and who knows, maybe Trump is too?', ">>{Murphy_York} : Interesting to see if the Democrats will start playing the 'states rights' card. Honestly, I've already started (I live in CA)...", ">>{Murphy_York} : To be honest, what's bad about it? Are there any points on which you disagree?", '>>{Murphy_York} : Dr. Sanjay Gupta is a bad source on marijuana? Do you have a degree in neuroscience and were you ever considered for Surgeon General?', ">>{Msshadow} : I find it... Interesting... That state's rights only seems to matter on the Republican side when the law is limiting freedoms or reinforcing a religious objective.", '>>{Murphy_York} : Exactly. States rights are important when Obama is in power. Now that Trump is the president everybody should fall in line and take it. makes sense. /s', '>>{Higher_Primate} : Ha! When the U.S President says: "Jump!" the Canadian PM says: "How high?" And I say that as a Canadian.', '>>{Msshadow} : I probably just need it Conserva-splained to me more often.', ">>{sgiomlaireached} : It's a bad TYPE of source. If he's written papers or has pointed you to scientific evidence, you should be using those as your source.", ">>{Murphy_York} : Sure, in a perfectly academic world. But we're living in the post-truth era. It's not the facts that matter, it's appealing to people's beliefs...", '>>{Phluffhead024} : Federalism is what our country is based on, and I think its great! We are a federation of states. We cooperate when we need large scale projects done, but we leave each to their own slice of the pie. I feel it should be a bipartisan issue, not a convenient issue.', ">>{Super_Happy_Fun_Time} : Just like your boy donny who did enough cocaine in the 80's to kill a horse."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{dont_tread_on_dc} : Polls show that President Trump’s personality is hurting his approval ratings', ">>{pizzashill} : I'm baffled as to how this even happened. Is America just a stupid country? At what point has Trump ever displayed he's not a delusional mentally ill moron? When did that happen?", ">>{creek_slam_sit} : Cameo in home alone 2, and that's literally it", ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : The one where he's a narcissist that his handlers don't know how to adapt to? Yeah, it check's out. Fuck that guy. Also don't eat any steak well done with ketchup. What the fuck??", ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : Yup, we're pretty dumb I think. Plenty of people think he's just this amazing billionaire that knows what the fuck he's talking about and ignores all the signs that's he's an idiot that just inherited his millions and is hiding that to project his image. I don't understand it but it is what is. What the FUCK???", '>>{pegothejerk} : They treat politics like Tinder: "From that staged photo he looks like he knows money and doesn\'t have chlamydia"', '>>{awkward_pause_} : His twitter history is enough to deem him a complete idiot. What the fuck did you do America? http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/#list-warming', '>>{MBAMBA0} : One would think his likely treasonous collusion with Putin would have made more of an impression.', ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : Pretty much. I've heard people in person say well he's a successful businessman so he knows what he's doing. I'm going to vote for him to run the country. I just don't understand and never will. People I'm actually related to and love without question did this and I'm still so baffled.", ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : I don't disagree. He's a fucking disgrace. I don't understand how semi competent people decided he was the best choice 4 months ago.", '>>{Immolated_Marmoset} : if down at your core, you suck eggs, you can only hide it for so long before people start to notice. And Trump sucks eggs.', '>>{FriesWithThat} : He\'s an asshole and a con man, I thought that *was* his appeal. It\'s not? If voters didn\'t want the "grab them by the pussy", "lock her up", "nasty women", "he might be a Muslim, I don\'t know", "they’re bringing crime. they’re rapists".... guy, then I\'m assuming it wasn\'t because of his warm personality. Either that or they were naive enough to believehe was just going to morph into being presidential after 70-years of spoiled entitlement, as opposed to still being this tantrum throwing baby man.', ">>{Betna_the_Pickled} : I'm as baffled as you. I live in a pure red state and did what I could on election day to vote even though it probably didn't matter when I voted against his crazy ass. I did what I could but most people here are just must vote republican party no matter what. UGH.", ">>{rockum} : Trump is utterly repulsive. My theory is that such a kid going to public schools would either be ostracized or get beaten up until he wasn't such a self-centered lying asshole. Trump was sheltered his whole life and so didn't get any feedback on his loathsome personality.", ">>{i-am-sancho} : Did the people who elected him somehow think he would suddenly grow up once he took office? He's been the same man-child his whole life. He behaved exactly this way during the campaign. Holy fuck people are stupid.", '>>{NSAElectricEye} : He is an extremely intelligent man that knows how to turn this country around. (i.e fix it)', '>>{smutketeer} : If only this sack of human feces was more couth I could go back to Facebook! Or something.', ">>{MonkeysOnMyBottom} : >At what point has Trump ever displayed he's not a delusional mentally ill moron? > >When did that happen? I assume he slept at some point", ">>{Choopytrags} : SO FUCKING WHAT? Are we going to do something about these assholes or what? Isn't this enough for us to just throw these Republican motherfuckers directly into jail?", ">>{aprildismay} : We didn't need a poll to tell us that.", '>>{n0xz} : Donnie has the best temperament, especially at 3am. Believe me.', ">>{crazyshoelaces} : There's plenty of people who are single-issue voters and saw he was anti-gun control, or anti-abortion, or anti-immigrant and decided that was who they were going to vote for. Single-issue voters are single-handedly one of the most aggravating groups of people in America.", '>>{barjam} : The parts of the country that elected him? Yes. They are statistically of lower intelligence.', '>>{xcalibur866} : We all just sat around as our education programming turned into ghosts, Nazis and Hitler conspiracies (history channel), pawn shows (discovery), honey boo boo ( The fucking LEARNING CHANNEL), we have a sizable population who think parodies like "Not another blank movie" or what have you are more than low hanging fruit, one of the most broken modern education systems in the world, and we willingly elected a reality tv star as our most prominent public leader. So yeah, it\'s safe to say as a country, we are dumb. Dumb dumb dumb.', '>>{pollardandsprout} : Who knew that making "80\'s movie bad guy" your prominent personality trait would make you unlikable?', '>>{narrauko} : > just must vote republican party no matter what Honestly, I think this is where most of his votes came from. People who never were going to vote for the Dem whether it was Hillary or somebody else. As long as the -R was after his name, he had their vote.', '>>{narrauko} : And even then the lobby was literally right there. Kinda sad that Kevin even needed to ask.', '>>{pizzashill} : Lower education, not lower intelligence. I know multiple people with advanced degrees that voted for Trump.'], [">>{mandrate} : But didn't he said that he leave it as it is when it was open to Florida?", '>>{RepelGropers} : That was when he wanted people to vote for him.', '>>{RepelGropers} : Too late. That opportunity was lost ten days ago.', '>>{RepelGropers} : Never understood why. Keeps people happy and docile.', '>>{Watchdog-E-M-} : I love when a "news" site can\'t even afford or don\'t even bother removing the .squarespace.com from their URL', ">>{rwilso7} : The AG doesn't make policy, the White House does. Trump has said little beyond a willingness to leave it up to the states. He could always change his mind, but the people around him probably have bigger fish to fry.", '>>{Sregor_Nevets} : I think he will. Sessions will likely be Trumps attack dog on select issues. That is my hope.', ">>{GrooveTheFusion} : It's an easy-to-grow plant, so it never gets too expensive. As a result, a lot of poor people use it. Keeping it illegal gives you an easy way to harvest a portion of that population at will, and causes the larger portion to always have something to be afraid of that will make them keep their heads down. Making marijuana illegal keeps users in line.", '>>{mandrate} : I would imagine if he wants people to beat the fuck out of each other they would still want to vote for him', '>>{jnr_77} : Last week I said this. Redditors replied "Muh billion dollar industry! Won\'t happen." heh', ">>{obstruct_GOP} : The will of the people wants it. So naturally, it won't happen. Trumpettes, are you against freedom, even if Donald seems to be? Or are you completely at his mercy?", ">>{Gamer9103} : It's only fake news if we don't like it!", ">>{PathOfDawn} : To be fair, the article is only speculating on the possibility of it happening. There's no concrete evidence yet to suggest they will or won't go after states that have voted on it.", '>>{jnr_77} : I think as long as these "sanctuary cities" cave, Trump will ignore it. But they are playing with fire there.', '>>{whr18} : Lies www.9news.com/mb/news/local/politics/trump-talks-clinton-fracking-marijuana/284425909 He has had some Hard core anti-Mary j advisors and has always said the same thing.', ">>{sgiomlaireached} : OP, it's their [poorly written] website.", '>>{fukdisaccount} : The Kims. Weed is 100% legal in North Korea.', '>>{thetaiyaki} : Good, fucking lazy druggies need to get off their ass.', '>>{Watchdog-E-M-} : Well it also seems like OP linked a personal blog, if we are actually going to call that a "news" site, I think I\'m actually done with r/politics >We disallow solicitation of users (petitions, polls, requests for money, etc.), personal blogs, satire, images, social media content (Facebook, twitter, tumblr, LinkedIn, etc.), wikis, memes, and political advertisements.', ">>{Msshadow} : States rights only matter when it's about women and minorities, apparently.", ">>{PathOfDawn} : Interesting, so you think that if Trump at least gets his way on immigration, that he won't bother spending the political capital to tackle marijuana?", ">>{jnr_77} : I think at best he just won't do anything. Which is not as progressive, as say, actually rescheduling Marijuana at the federal level and letting states decide for themselves without being in direct conflict with Federal Law. Trump is for state's rights. But he also gives no fucks about weed so I don't see him really bothering to push for any type of weed-friendly legislation.", ">>{Higher_Primate} : Wonder if he's going to try and reign in Trudeau too.", '>>{Higher_Primate} : But keeping people doped up also keeps them in line.', ">>{KarmaPolice911} : That's a personal choice on the part of the user. The government isn't forcing people to be alcoholics by allowing alcohol to be legal, either.", ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I don't think Trump personally cares about weed, but members of his Cabinet might.", ">>{MafiaVsNinja} : Who cares about Trump's feelings. The GOP is in charge on all levels and has always been anti-marijuana. This will continue.", '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : You seriously think Jeff Sessions is going to miss a chance to be a vindictive shit about stuff he looks down on and has fought all his life? He will "enforce the law" with a big smile on his creepy face.', '>>{akaBigWurm} : yeah, they should get off their asses and get hooked on opioids and meth /s', ">>{PathOfDawn} : I definitely agree with all of that. That's the best case scenario. I guess my main concern with Trump is not what his personal feelings are on the issue, but rather is he stupid enough to not care when members of his cabinet take action that will so obviously be bad politics.", '>>{thetaiyaki} : Strong willed people have good jobs because they stay off drugs.', ">>{volares} : Good people don't smoke they drink scotch and beat their wives.", '>>{jnr_77} : There are no consequences for him if he lets them do whatever they want.', ">>{plato1123} : Wasn't ther a study a few years ago that said pot smokers [don't get alzheimers](http://www.esquire.com/lifestyle/health/news/a46593/marijuana-alzheimers-research/)? I can understand why the GOP feels threatened, people with alzheimer's are one of their key support groups.", '>>{Higher_Primate} : None but I know tons of potheads who wont get of their couches to do anything. Sounds like the perfect subject for an authoritarian.', ">>{eatchocolatebehappy} : > None but I know tons of potheads who wont get of their couches to do anything. You sure you're not talking about people w/ pill problems?", '>>{akaBigWurm} : Those people sound boring, I like people with excellent jobs that are not as up tight', '>>{MajorPrune} : > Weed is 100% legal in North Korea. TIL ...only the Sith...', '>>{djskil} : Is every "article" on /politics just some progressive\'s opinion?', ">>{LVenemy} : Weed puts a dent in pharma 'S profit line and keeps prisons full. From an established investor POV it's better if it illegal", '>>{bestbeforeMar91} : Peter Thiel is a big investor in marijuana and who knows, maybe Trump is too?', ">>{Murphy_York} : Interesting to see if the Democrats will start playing the 'states rights' card. Honestly, I've already started (I live in CA)...", ">>{Murphy_York} : To be honest, what's bad about it? Are there any points on which you disagree?", '>>{Murphy_York} : Dr. Sanjay Gupta is a bad source on marijuana? Do you have a degree in neuroscience and were you ever considered for Surgeon General?', ">>{Msshadow} : I find it... Interesting... That state's rights only seems to matter on the Republican side when the law is limiting freedoms or reinforcing a religious objective.", '>>{Murphy_York} : Exactly. States rights are important when Obama is in power. Now that Trump is the president everybody should fall in line and take it. makes sense. /s', '>>{Higher_Primate} : Ha! When the U.S President says: "Jump!" the Canadian PM says: "How high?" And I say that as a Canadian.', '>>{Msshadow} : I probably just need it Conserva-splained to me more often.', ">>{sgiomlaireached} : It's a bad TYPE of source. If he's written papers or has pointed you to scientific evidence, you should be using those as your source.", ">>{Murphy_York} : Sure, in a perfectly academic world. But we're living in the post-truth era. It's not the facts that matter, it's appealing to people's beliefs...", '>>{Phluffhead024} : Federalism is what our country is based on, and I think its great! We are a federation of states. We cooperate when we need large scale projects done, but we leave each to their own slice of the pie. I feel it should be a bipartisan issue, not a convenient issue.', ">>{Super_Happy_Fun_Time} : Just like your boy donny who did enough cocaine in the 80's to kill a horse."], [">>{FowelBallz} : From Antarctica to Europe: Women's Marches Around the World", ">>{Pentafractis} : Wew, lad. More people turned out for the women's marches, myself included (London!) than Donny got for his inauguration. That awkward moment when the silent majority is also fucking invisible. Comin' for ya, Donny. You are not prepared. Edit: Some food for thought, OP. If you get any shitty, snide messages or comments, just remember. Strong women scare weak men. The last time this many women marched on a leader's residence, they brought back Louis XIV in a cage. And more human beings showed up to march in solidarity, for peace, equality and the American way, than they did to celebrate the inauguration of a tiny handed little orange freak. You're on the right side. We all are.", ">>{GrandPumba} : You know you've fucked up when even Antarctica is showing up to protest.", ">>{FowelBallz} : This. Because even if it is summer down there, it's still cold enough to freeze your nuts off (quite appropriate for a woman's march).", '>>{Youdontknowjack900} : They were extra invisible in DC. I walked past the bikers for trump "rally" today, and there were about 20 people.', ">>{Pentafractis} : Music to my ears. It's like hot chicken noodle soup for the heart.", ">>{financialanon} : I'm curious what the largest protests in history have been? Surely this is on the list.", '>>{Trump_kills_your_ass} : considering that hardly any march happened outside of majority white countries, this should be a nice opportunity for the white feminists to recognize their privilege for once', ">>{GrandPumba} : I'm pretty sure there have been larger protests for localized areas, but as a global event I wouldn't be surprised if this was the largest ever. If there has been a bigger global protest it may have been the anti Iraq war ones.", '>>{little_green_lamb} : Kenya, India, Thailand, Ghana...etc.'], ['>>{NamelessNinja66} : iPhone 6 "this cable or accessory is not certified" even with apple official charger', '>>{culiseta} : I think this error has more to do with the lightning cable plugging into the iPhone rather than the charger cube. If use the original white USB to Lightning cable does the error continue?', ">>{Mattallica} : Check to see if there's any lint or debris in your charging port. A toothpick works good but I wouldn't recommend anything metal.", '>>{NamelessNinja66} : yes ive tried 4 different cords all of them official', ">>{Mattallica} : Weird. I hope your charging port isn't bad. I had to replace mine last year on a 5 because of that message and now every cable works fine. I could only get one charger to work and it had to be in a very specific placement, even down to which side of the lightning charger was facing up.", '>>{loucy888} : Is your USB Cable new or old? If use for longtime, maybe port is damaged, so cannot connect well.', '>>{cnthwz} : I am using non mfi charger and cables and does not have this problem. I believe your phone has some problems.', '>>{treyhunna83} : Port going bad sir. Get replaced. Covered under warranty', '>>{McInnis7} : I have the same issue too. No lint or debris either. Might have to see what Apple has to say.', ">>{MeowFood} : I get this once every 6 months on my iPhone. Apple has assured me it is software based, not a hardware issue. Completely restoring factory settings and setting it up as a new iPhone is the only way I can solve this. I'm moving to Android when my contract is up. Rebuilding my phone every 6 months is tedious."], [">>{Muh_Condishuns} : I'm a black ex-cop, and this is the real truth about race and policing", '>>{moxy801} : Hope this gets lots of upvotes, and excellent article A few interesting quotes: >...About that 15 percent of officers who regularly abuse their power: a major problem is they exert an outsize influence on department culture and find support for their actions from ranking officers and police unions. Chicago is a prime example of this: the city has created a reparations fund for the hundreds of victims who were tortured by former Chicago Police Commander Jon Burge and officers under his command from the 1970s to the early ‘90s. >...The mainstream media helps sustain the narrative of heroism that even corrupt officers take refuge in', ">>{Muh_Condishuns} : I'm not comfortable with 15% of cops being George Zimmerman. *15%*", ">>{moxy801} : Oh please, right now about 80% of all network TV shows are police procedurals or some variation thereof with average citizens needing to rely on some authority figure to 'protect' them from their fellow citizens.", '>>{frankenpuss} : He has a solution: >Every officer in the country should be wearing a body camera that remains activated throughout any interaction they have with the public while on duty. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy for officers when they are on duty and in service to the public. Citizens must also have the right to record police officers as they carry out their public service, provided that they are at a safe distance, based on the circumstances, and not interfering. Witnessing an interaction does not by itself constitute interference. Right there. The cops have no legitimate reason to object.', '>>{vph} : >Fifteen percent of officers will abuse their authority at every opportunity. I am not surprised one bit. Policing is a profession that naturally attracts folks who want power and have trouble controlling their power. This is why we need laws to keep them in check. It is also important to point out that the tendency to abuse power is not necessarily equating to racist behaviors. Yes, if you combine power abuse and racism, then you have an ugly byproduct. Racism is a product of our culture and our education. So, what we need is a set of laws that keep those in power responsible and a culture that encourages openness to different races and cultures.', '>>{dajesus77} : That sounds like a reasonable solution, until you realize that even with video evidence, cops are still given the benefit of the doubt. We are told to ignore our lying eyes.', '>>{GhostOfJebsCampaign} : George Zimmerman was vigilant and protected his neighborhood. He also saved an entire family from a burning SUV. We should want police to be like George Zimmerman.', '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : Another solution: cops should be personally liable for excessive force/abuse of authority, and have to carry malpractice insurance to cover the potential liability. Officers that routinely abuse their authority would become uninsurable (or at least prohibitively expensive to insure) and would no longer be able to work. Plus, taxpayers wouldn\'t be on the hook for paying for their abuses. I would think republicans would love to have such a "market based" approach to the problem (if they can ever get themselves to admit a problem exists).', ">>{Nosnownow} : How so? My best friend was a white police officer working in black neighbourhoods and finally quit because he couldn't deal with the day to day racism and violence against blacks by his fellow officers. Said he quit before he became like them. BTW my community has nowhere near the police violence problem.", ">>{Beeftech67} : Didn't we pretty much determine this with the [DOJ report on Ferguson](https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf) last year?", ">>{cakeandbeer} : I don't have a strong opinion either way, but a reason against body cameras to consider is that not every police contact with someone who broke the law results in an arrest. This is because police have discretion on when they arrest or cite, and whether they decide instead to tell people to move along, destroy their drug paraphernalia, or whatever. With body cameras, they would be obligated to follow through every time someone commits an offense, which could be something as trivial as loitering or public urination. Arresting everyone for everything isn't just bad community policing, but bringing someone in and booking them is a huge drain on resources and takes officers away from going after the real criminals. I can easily picture decoys antagonizing cops just to get arrested and distract them from someone committing a serious crime. There are several points throughout the criminal justice process where it seemed like the obvious solution was to limit, for example, judicial discretion, but doing so made the problem worse. Remains to be seen.", '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : How is an article about racial issues with policing not political?', ">>{siouxsie_siouxv2} : it's political in nature... but not explicitly about US politics. Try /r/news"]]

classify and reply

[">>{nlykamart} : Apple's redesigned iPhone might not be ready in time for a September launch", '>>{Bigchile123} : Good. Better to wait a little longer for a better phone.', '>>{nlykamart} : But iPhone Battery is always not upto the mark..compared to the other brand smartphones :)', '>>{Bigchile123} : What are you talking about? Everyone knows iPhone has better iPhone battery.', ">>{nlykamart} : I don't think so...iPhone has rubbish battery life....iPhone has Excellent software ....but still battery drains fast....My suggestion is go for MI phones ...", '>>{Bigchile123} : I think most iPhones (plus models) have the best battery life in the market. Have you used a plus.', ">>{nlykamart} : yes I have 6 plus I have used it ..I am not happy with the battery life..even though its has single sim ...I doesn't even pass through the whole day...To be frank to say I have also Redmi note 3 with heavy usage I am getting one and half days...such an awesome battery life...", '>>{nlykamart} : hehe...no no..its good condition 8 months old .....battery life of iPhone 6 pus only 4hours Screen on time...I would say its just average battery life for ay.......but Redmi note 3 comes Screen on time in 8+ hours....I request you to better try Redmi note 3....:)', '>>{Bigchile123} : 4 hours of screen time? That sounds way off. Your plus was malfunctioning.', '>>{nlykamart} : how much SOT for your iPhone ..let me know']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{nlykamart} : Apple's redesigned iPhone might not be ready in time for a September launch", '>>{Bigchile123} : Good. Better to wait a little longer for a better phone.', '>>{nlykamart} : But iPhone Battery is always not upto the mark..compared to the other brand smartphones :)', '>>{Bigchile123} : What are you talking about? Everyone knows iPhone has better iPhone battery.', ">>{nlykamart} : I don't think so...iPhone has rubbish battery life....iPhone has Excellent software ....but still battery drains fast....My suggestion is go for MI phones ...", '>>{Bigchile123} : I think most iPhones (plus models) have the best battery life in the market. Have you used a plus.', ">>{nlykamart} : yes I have 6 plus I have used it ..I am not happy with the battery life..even though its has single sim ...I doesn't even pass through the whole day...To be frank to say I have also Redmi note 3 with heavy usage I am getting one and half days...such an awesome battery life...", '>>{nlykamart} : hehe...no no..its good condition 8 months old .....battery life of iPhone 6 pus only 4hours Screen on time...I would say its just average battery life for ay.......but Redmi note 3 comes Screen on time in 8+ hours....I request you to better try Redmi note 3....:)', '>>{Bigchile123} : 4 hours of screen time? That sounds way off. Your plus was malfunctioning.', '>>{nlykamart} : how much SOT for your iPhone ..let me know']]

classify and reply

['>>{_Iconoclast__} : Today it seems like more of a competition to be the biggest victim. People have taken it to far which is another reason people are going to vote Trump.', '>>{readerseven} : Why "Bringing Down the Temple" instead of fixing what needs to be fixed [Declaring a trade war on the world can only lead to collapsing confidence and recession][Mr. President-elect: Just don\'t do it.]', '>>{damonpointagates} : China is killing us in trade. Edit: Для Родины!', '>>{Shirinator} : No fucking shit. His soon-to-be ambassador to Brussels literally is saying one of his goals is to destroy the EU. Largest trading block in the whole fucking world. He wants to start a trade war.', '>>{ChosenNaame} : >Political correctness is about people saying no to bigots that dont fall in line to your way of thinking. FTFY', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : So says Trump. So says Banon. So says Putin.', ">>{damonpointagates} : [lol, the Russians! Okay, well this 'Russian' voted for Trump.](https://i.reddituploads.com/159403c816af4611ad64b0da4307e64f?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=e17905bf4fd6414ee4aab8c86244cc53)", ">>{UnHappy_Farmer} : How would I know. You say the same thing as the Russians. It's impossible to tell you apart.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Political correctness is about deciding that every opinion that doesn't agree with yours is bigoted.", '>>{Astalano} : > Somehow the right seems to that think "Not being politically correct" = being an asshole You\'re projecting. Political correctness is all about projection and it involves attempts at mind reading and imagining the most racist thing you can think of in order to project it onto your opponent and build a strawman that you can then knock down. Now the term \'anchor baby\' is not \'politically correct\' or how about the entire discussion on Islamism? Political correctness when taken to its logical conclusion involves thought policing. There is a difference between political correctness and not being an asshole. You have to have a sense of CHARITY when confronting civil discourse. > In philosophy and rhetoric, the principle of charity requires interpreting a speaker\'s statements to be rational and, in the case of any argument, considering its best, strongest possible interpretation.[1] In its narrowest sense, the goal of this methodological principle is to avoid attributing irrationality, logical fallacies or falsehoods to the others\' statements, when a coherent, rational interpretation of the statements is available. According to Simon Blackburn[2] "it constrains the interpreter to maximize the truth or rationality in the subject\'s sayings." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : And what the fuck is up with that stupid picture you attached?', ">>{a09j} : It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what.", '>>{here2red} : Political Correctness is about getting you to like the new Ghostbusters even though the movie sucks ass.', '>>{damonpointagates} : Can you please show me anywhere, where any Russian said "China is killing us in trade."', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Can you please stop employing cheap Russian propaganda tricks?', ">>{mjaumjau} : It's about dispersing delusional anti-reality progressive dogma by enforcing linguistic trickery at all levels of society and by attacking anybody who describes things in an accurate way.", ">>{Plugawy_Nedznik} : Calling someone an asshole is just ad hominem. It is not an argument. So I don't know what point you're trying to make.", ">>{1461DaysInHell} : The coming trump trade war will drive up prices and reduce our exports. They will stall out the economy and cause a downward spiral in the gdp (recession). In short: we're fucked", ">>{ColossalMistake} : No it's about social justice warriors expecting everyone to think like and hold the same values as they do...then when they learn not everyone agrees they feel the need to chastise others, belittle and insult them until they fall into line. It's all a lot of nonsense.", ">>{damonpointagates} : Can you please stop slinging insults to Americans who don't align politically with your beliefs. [I will be here all night counting down until the celebration, if you happen to find just one example let me know.](https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20170120T12)", '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Do you have a list you check off? Like an Indian call center?', '>>{damonpointagates} : Okay, so jokes.... Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar. Donald leans over, and with a smile on his face, says, “The media is really tearing you apart for that scandal.” Hillary: “You mean my lying about Benghazi?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean the massive voter fraud?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean the military not getting their votes counted?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Using my secret private server with classified material to hide my activities?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “The NSA monitoring our phone calls, emails and everything else?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Using the Clinton Foundation as a cover for tax evasion, hiring cronies, And taking bribes from foreign countries? Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean the drones being operated in our own country without the benefit of the law?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million, and right afterward it declared bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean arming the Muslim Brotherhood and hiring them in the White House?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Whitewater, Watergate committee, Vince Foster, commodity deals?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “The funding of neo-Nazis in the Ukraine that led to the toppling of the democratically elected president and to the biggest crisis that country has had since WWII?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Turning Libya into chaos?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Being the mastermind of the so-called “Arab Spring” that only brought chaos, death and destruction to the Middle East and North Africa ? Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Leaving four Americans to die in Benghazi and go to sleep? Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Trashing Mubarak, one of our few Muslim friends?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Encouraging and supporting the murders of Palestinians and the destruction of their homes, towns and villages by Israel ?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “The funding and arming of terrorists in Syria, the destruction and destabilization of that nation, giving the order to our lapdogs in Turkey and Saudi Arabia to give sarin gas to the “moderate” terrorists in Syria that they eventually used on civilians, and framed Assad, and had it not been for the Russians and Putin, we would have used that as a pretext to invade Syria, put a puppet in power, steal their natural resources, and leave that country in total chaos, just like we did with Libya? Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “The creation of the biggest refugees crisis since WWII Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Leaving Iraq in chaos? ” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “The DOJ spying on the press?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean HHS Secretary Sibelius shaking down health insurance Executives?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Giving our cronies in SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and three months later they declared bankruptcy and then the Chinese bought it?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “The NSA monitoring citizens’ ?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “The State Department interfering with an Inspector General Investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Me, The IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Threats to all of Bill’s former mistresses to keep them quiet” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “I give up! … Oh wait, I think I’ve got it! When I stole the White House furniture and silverware when Bill left office?” Trump: **“THAT’S IT!**', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Really, so that is what you do when you get exposed? Sad!', ">>{ColossalMistake} : You're* Seriously, cry more though. The world needs assholes as much as it needs perfect little angels who live in shatter proof glass houses.", '>>{sanemaat} : I like this response. Thank you for that.', ">>{damonpointagates} : If you even did an ounce of homework your theory falls apart. 2 year old account. Multiple comments from over a year ago and throughout discussing my locally collected mineral collection. Posts posting rockhounding finds, from the day in multiple posts. User name literally references the rocks I collect and the location where their from. All this to convince some hillbot, do you think it's possible that you're the one divorced from reality?", '>>{in_the_saddle_again} : Political correctness is facism pretending to be manners - george carlin', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Long con, eh? 2 years down the toilet? That sucks. No bonus this month.', ">>{damonpointagates} : OMG, you actually believe your self. I'm going to stop here, just wow. What can I say you got me, back to the gulag for me I guess.", ">>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Keep going. I don't know what to believe anymore. /s", '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : They are running a very effective joint propaganda script. Which sounds ridiculous. But is likely true.', ">>{TrumpVotersAre2Blame} : Destabilize the worlds economy. Destabilize Nato. What's the worst that could happen?", ">>{plato1123} : >Bloomberg Editorial Board Ouch! Panic is starting to set in in the business community. Is impeachment going to be the only option? And is there anyway the Trump presidency doesn't destroy the Trump brand? He of course went through this whole thing to make money, and the sheer magnitude of his incompetence might lead to a major reckoning for him and his brand. I honestly don't see how this can possibly end well for him.", ">>{BeowulfShaeffer} : Who is that and where did he say that? I haven't heard this particular factoid."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{readerseven} : Why "Bringing Down the Temple" instead of fixing what needs to be fixed [Declaring a trade war on the world can only lead to collapsing confidence and recession][Mr. President-elect: Just don\'t do it.]', '>>{damonpointagates} : China is killing us in trade. Edit: Для Родины!', '>>{Shirinator} : No fucking shit. His soon-to-be ambassador to Brussels literally is saying one of his goals is to destroy the EU. Largest trading block in the whole fucking world. He wants to start a trade war.', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : So says Trump. So says Banon. So says Putin.', ">>{damonpointagates} : [lol, the Russians! Okay, well this 'Russian' voted for Trump.](https://i.reddituploads.com/159403c816af4611ad64b0da4307e64f?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=e17905bf4fd6414ee4aab8c86244cc53)", ">>{UnHappy_Farmer} : How would I know. You say the same thing as the Russians. It's impossible to tell you apart.", '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : And what the fuck is up with that stupid picture you attached?', '>>{damonpointagates} : Can you please show me anywhere, where any Russian said "China is killing us in trade."', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Can you please stop employing cheap Russian propaganda tricks?', ">>{1461DaysInHell} : The coming trump trade war will drive up prices and reduce our exports. They will stall out the economy and cause a downward spiral in the gdp (recession). In short: we're fucked", ">>{damonpointagates} : Can you please stop slinging insults to Americans who don't align politically with your beliefs. [I will be here all night counting down until the celebration, if you happen to find just one example let me know.](https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20170120T12)", '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Do you have a list you check off? Like an Indian call center?', '>>{damonpointagates} : Okay, so jokes.... Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar. Donald leans over, and with a smile on his face, says, “The media is really tearing you apart for that scandal.” Hillary: “You mean my lying about Benghazi?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean the massive voter fraud?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean the military not getting their votes counted?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Using my secret private server with classified material to hide my activities?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “The NSA monitoring our phone calls, emails and everything else?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Using the Clinton Foundation as a cover for tax evasion, hiring cronies, And taking bribes from foreign countries? Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean the drones being operated in our own country without the benefit of the law?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million, and right afterward it declared bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean arming the Muslim Brotherhood and hiring them in the White House?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Whitewater, Watergate committee, Vince Foster, commodity deals?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “The funding of neo-Nazis in the Ukraine that led to the toppling of the democratically elected president and to the biggest crisis that country has had since WWII?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Turning Libya into chaos?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Being the mastermind of the so-called “Arab Spring” that only brought chaos, death and destruction to the Middle East and North Africa ? Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Leaving four Americans to die in Benghazi and go to sleep? Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Trashing Mubarak, one of our few Muslim friends?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Encouraging and supporting the murders of Palestinians and the destruction of their homes, towns and villages by Israel ?” Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “The funding and arming of terrorists in Syria, the destruction and destabilization of that nation, giving the order to our lapdogs in Turkey and Saudi Arabia to give sarin gas to the “moderate” terrorists in Syria that they eventually used on civilians, and framed Assad, and had it not been for the Russians and Putin, we would have used that as a pretext to invade Syria, put a puppet in power, steal their natural resources, and leave that country in total chaos, just like we did with Libya? Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “The creation of the biggest refugees crisis since WWII Trump: “No the other one.” Hillary: “Leaving Iraq in chaos? ” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “The DOJ spying on the press?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “You mean HHS Secretary Sibelius shaking down health insurance Executives?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Giving our cronies in SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and three months later they declared bankruptcy and then the Chinese bought it?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “The NSA monitoring citizens’ ?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “The State Department interfering with an Inspector General Investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Me, The IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “Threats to all of Bill’s former mistresses to keep them quiet” Trump: “No, the other one.” Hillary: “I give up! … Oh wait, I think I’ve got it! When I stole the White House furniture and silverware when Bill left office?” Trump: **“THAT’S IT!**', '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Really, so that is what you do when you get exposed? Sad!', ">>{damonpointagates} : If you even did an ounce of homework your theory falls apart. 2 year old account. Multiple comments from over a year ago and throughout discussing my locally collected mineral collection. Posts posting rockhounding finds, from the day in multiple posts. User name literally references the rocks I collect and the location where their from. All this to convince some hillbot, do you think it's possible that you're the one divorced from reality?", '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Long con, eh? 2 years down the toilet? That sucks. No bonus this month.', ">>{damonpointagates} : OMG, you actually believe your self. I'm going to stop here, just wow. What can I say you got me, back to the gulag for me I guess.", ">>{UnHappy_Farmer} : Keep going. I don't know what to believe anymore. /s", '>>{UnHappy_Farmer} : They are running a very effective joint propaganda script. Which sounds ridiculous. But is likely true.', ">>{TrumpVotersAre2Blame} : Destabilize the worlds economy. Destabilize Nato. What's the worst that could happen?", ">>{plato1123} : >Bloomberg Editorial Board Ouch! Panic is starting to set in in the business community. Is impeachment going to be the only option? And is there anyway the Trump presidency doesn't destroy the Trump brand? He of course went through this whole thing to make money, and the sheer magnitude of his incompetence might lead to a major reckoning for him and his brand. I honestly don't see how this can possibly end well for him.", ">>{BeowulfShaeffer} : Who is that and where did he say that? I haven't heard this particular factoid."], ['>>{_Iconoclast__} : Today it seems like more of a competition to be the biggest victim. People have taken it to far which is another reason people are going to vote Trump.', '>>{ChosenNaame} : >Political correctness is about people saying no to bigots that dont fall in line to your way of thinking. FTFY', ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Political correctness is about deciding that every opinion that doesn't agree with yours is bigoted.", '>>{Astalano} : > Somehow the right seems to that think "Not being politically correct" = being an asshole You\'re projecting. Political correctness is all about projection and it involves attempts at mind reading and imagining the most racist thing you can think of in order to project it onto your opponent and build a strawman that you can then knock down. Now the term \'anchor baby\' is not \'politically correct\' or how about the entire discussion on Islamism? Political correctness when taken to its logical conclusion involves thought policing. There is a difference between political correctness and not being an asshole. You have to have a sense of CHARITY when confronting civil discourse. > In philosophy and rhetoric, the principle of charity requires interpreting a speaker\'s statements to be rational and, in the case of any argument, considering its best, strongest possible interpretation.[1] In its narrowest sense, the goal of this methodological principle is to avoid attributing irrationality, logical fallacies or falsehoods to the others\' statements, when a coherent, rational interpretation of the statements is available. According to Simon Blackburn[2] "it constrains the interpreter to maximize the truth or rationality in the subject\'s sayings." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity', ">>{a09j} : It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what.", '>>{here2red} : Political Correctness is about getting you to like the new Ghostbusters even though the movie sucks ass.', ">>{mjaumjau} : It's about dispersing delusional anti-reality progressive dogma by enforcing linguistic trickery at all levels of society and by attacking anybody who describes things in an accurate way.", ">>{Plugawy_Nedznik} : Calling someone an asshole is just ad hominem. It is not an argument. So I don't know what point you're trying to make.", ">>{ColossalMistake} : No it's about social justice warriors expecting everyone to think like and hold the same values as they do...then when they learn not everyone agrees they feel the need to chastise others, belittle and insult them until they fall into line. It's all a lot of nonsense.", ">>{ColossalMistake} : You're* Seriously, cry more though. The world needs assholes as much as it needs perfect little angels who live in shatter proof glass houses.", '>>{sanemaat} : I like this response. Thank you for that.', '>>{in_the_saddle_again} : Political correctness is facism pretending to be manners - george carlin']]

classify and reply

[">>{reallyjay} : Minimum wage in Palm Beach is $8.05 an hour. He's hiring these workers at between $11 to $13 an hour. If our citizens are so desperate for employment, why are these jobs going unfilled? How is Trump making money off this? He stiffs them on hours? What? There's got to be a loop hole.", ">>{rhino910} : Clinton to Trump: You don't represent the real America. I do.", '>>{President_Tantrump} : Clientele loves the foreign help! Treat your supporters right - POTUS', '>>{Topher1999} : [Meta] Can we do something about the constant floods of "iPhone 7/Plus camera is amazing?"', '>>{Restever99} : You both represent the real America! Disgusting, corrupt, above the law, greedy, and full of yourselves!', ">>{Silver_Skeeter} : Meanwhile, most of America disagrees with Yahoo and recognize that these two don't even come close to representing 'the real America'. The privilege that these two grew up with doesn't just grow on trees.", '>>{Kanye_Westeroz} : The cognitive dissonance that is going on between Trump voters and the Republicans who endorse him is staggering and scary', ">>{rrl_csci} : No, you both Represent the top 1%. A large portion of the other 99% doesn't even make as much in years of full pay to even come close to one of Clinton's Wallstreet speeches. http://hillarytranscriptclock.com/", ">>{Zalaiya} : Well, there's going 4 for 500 on bankruptcy, and then there's leeching $45 million of Haiti relief funds to reward hotel contractors instead of building thousands of homes for disaster victims. So pick and choose.", ">>{altCognito} : I'm honestly a little confused. You're not supposed to be able to hire H1-Bs for less than the prevailing wage, and I thought it was only supposed to apply to tech positions. I would think that tech companies who compete for these jobs would raise a bigger stink about this. What's up with that?", '>>{rhino910} : The unions that endorsed Hillary Clinton are part of the 1%?', ">>{BritishTrash} : I agree, too many of these posts. I'll just report and move on. Maybe a mega thread would help?", '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : I\'m more fed up with the stupid spam blog posts about how the iPhone 8 is going to be "hand crafted by god himself to look like a Galaxy S7 in this shitty render" than I am about nice pictures. Or the youtube videos about "how this emoji text will brick your iPhone lol try it on ur frends".', ">>{Joegotbored} : He doubled membership from 100k to 200k recently but can't afford American staff?", ">>{rubenol} : You're confusing H-2B with H-1B. H-2B is for temporary labour work. It's still a laughably hypocritical thing to do, but that's the distinction.", ">>{TinyBaron} : If he didn't want this kind of scrutiny he shouldn't have run for office.", ">>{rrl_csci} : Where did you see anything about Unions in my comment specifically? Clinton and Trump are both part of the top 1%, what's arguable about that? She makes more than many make in 10 years worth of work for an hour long speech.", ">>{trtsmb} : He apparently also can't afford to pay decent wages considering how expensive that part of Florida is.", '>>{vootator} : Not sure how it works in other sectors, but in my world companies hire H1 labor because the company can keep them around for years and not pay them a dime in benefits.', ">>{Lord_Von_Fappington} : Agreed. I mean, they're great considering it's a camera in a phone and probably better than most of us need on a daily basis, however, any real camera blows the pics taken by *any* phone clear out of the water.", ">>{Lyin_Don} : it's going to be america first. america first.", ">>{SATexas1} : I don't like how the democrats spin immigration laws into a hate for a minority. That bothers me, it's dishonest. I don't like Trump trying to act like he's blue collar - it's ridiculous. These are just really bad candidates", ">>{anonuisance} : > However, hiring workers from abroad seems to contradict Trump’s public pronouncements. The president-elect has publicly shamed Carrier Corp., Ford Motor and others for their decisions to move manufacturing jobs to Mexico. > Neither Trump’s transition team nor Mar-a-Lago’s manager responded to requests for comment. During a March presidential debate, Trump defended his hiring of foreign workers. > “It’s very, very hard to get people,” Trump said. “Other hotels do the exact same thing.” > CareerSource Palm Beach County, a nonprofit job placement agency, says it knows plenty of American citizens willing to work at Mar-a-Lago. > “We have hundreds of qualified candidates and hundreds of job orders for various hospitality positions such as servers, chefs, cooks, bartenders, housekeeping, guest services, spa services, recreation, maintenance and more,” CareerSource spokesman Tom Veenstra said. Fascinating. Is this one of the businesses his sons who absolutely don't talk to him are running?", ">>{deathsnuggle} : I'm not a huge fan of it, it's obviously fake bokeh. Albeit well done, it's still fake and looks like ass. But hey, to each their own.", ">>{TyrannosuarezRex} : You do understand that businesses can fail and not file for bankruptcy right? Your number intentionally tries to deceive as if he has 496 successful businesses but it's pretty easy to show that's not the case.", ">>{trtsmb} : Most people don't want to take a temporary low wage job and then have to look for another job in 8-10 weeks. H2B visas are for temp work. His son is doing the exact same thing at the winery he owns.", ">>{hammadurb} : If he hired Americans, he would have to pay a more competitive wage which is higher than he's paying the foreign workers. The foreign workers can't just quit and go to work at another place which pays more.", '>>{Rubyjane123} : Real America voted overwhelmingly for Bernie Sanders and was silenced.', '>>{Pollo_Jack} : If you ignore the percentage yearly increases then yes he is paying more. Even if it was just a one percent increase it would cost less to hire a new person at ten cents more instead of a letting an experienced person keep their pay for twenty cents or so more. Ultimately a small savings in wages at the cost of training and dealing with less experienced people. For example, the savings are negated by the persons first broken plate.', ">>{emr1028} : Hillary didn't grow up privileged lol. Trump got $250 million from Daddy, Hillary grew up with a mother who was abandoned as a child.", '>>{emr1028} : Hillary earned her wealth. Why is it bad to be successful?', '>>{hammadurb} : Most people would rather have the temp job for however long it is rather than not having a job.', ">>{c0pypastry} : He doesn't even hire Americans to piss on him. Sad!", ">>{rrl_csci} : It's not bad to be successful. Is it wholly acceptable to have 16 million children living in poverty and 45% in low-income families struggling to get by while their parents work their asses off at 2-3 jobs and an individual for a 1 hour speech to banks makes more than the poorer families make in 10 years?", ">>{examinati0n} : I like this idea. To me, it's clear people love their iPhone and all but these threads are annoying. I feel it could be better served with having a sticky perhaps that can serve as a home for these posts where people can share their photos while the sub main page is here for issues and discussion about aspects of iPhone that aren't a photo. I'm aware there are subs for iPhone photography but I think it might be nice to keep people here and allow them a place for their passion rather than send them elsewhere and react negatively to them.", '>>{AlmostFamousGuy} : Hillary is not the America I know. What a narcissistic thing for her to say.', '>>{rhino910} : > Where did you see anything about Unions in my comment specifically? They are not in your comments because that FACT shows you are wrong in your claims. That would be why you left out the fact that working class people are behind Hillary', '>>{Tito1983} : I use to own a Nexus 6P and in that sub reddit they had a great solution to this: Sundays are the day to post pictures, only Sundays. So all people there wait until that day of the week to post photos taken by themselves. That can be a great idea to implement here. Edit: spelling.', '>>{savageboredom} : You could try going to /r/AppleWatch sometime. "Look what I just bought!" "Finally joined the club!" "Decided to treat myself!" Every goddamn day.', ">>{rhino910} : Wasn't that a Republican argument? That anyone who doesn't support my candidate isn't a real American", '>>{TyrannosuarezRex} : They have shown its the case. Over and over and over. Google "trump failed businesses" and you\'ll see for yourself. You\'re not very good at correcting records.', ">>{AutoGeek3000} : I'd actually rather have these rumor posts than pictures from iPhone 7+ cameras.", ">>{AutoGeek3000} : > Maybe a mega thread would help? Good idea, although these circlejerk trends come and go within a few days so we'll just need a different mega thread in a few days for whatever the next one is.", '>>{bernieaccountess} : yes, a sleasy, racist, businesses man and a corrupt, greedy, politician..... souunds like the america everyone told me about when i was young..', '>>{hello3pat} : These are H2 which apparently means even shorter temp work.', '>>{emr1028} : Her making money does not make other people poor, so yes.', '>>{shapeshiftingrobot} : So true. At least they finally implemented tags after 2 years so I can filter out show off posts.', ">>{letdogsvote} : So, her mom had struggles but she didn't. Got it.", ">>{WalterJrsBreakfast} : Just downvote and move on. If this is truly a problem, enough people will downvote and you won't see them in the future.", '>>{-notausername_} : I feel like Satan would probably design a better phone ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯', ">>{rrl_csci} : Many are behind Trump too. Does that change the fact that they're not part of the top 1%?", ">>{ConstanceVigilant} : Does no-one read [the rules that are posted on the sidebar](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/wiki/rules)? Photo posts are *already* banned. The problem is that you [must message the mods directly](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fiphone) to get them removed, they don't check reports. > 1. Image posts with iPhone photography will be removed. Try /r/iPhonePictures, /r/iphoneography, or /r/itookapicture.", '>>{flickerkuu} : Oh god please. Especially since most of the photos and photogs are NOT great. I love one of the first ones posted that was literally the back of a dogs ear. The camera is not that amazing. You are simply just discovering the concept of lack of depth of field which the camera can be buggy about.', '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : Buy American! (My daughter\'s shit is made in 3rd world nations) "Hire American!" (Ignore the pipeline of foreigners working for me) "I\'m the greatest negotiator!" (Gives Canadian company permission to pipe Canadian oil through America to sell to the Chinese) "I won the popular vote!" (A German golfer said so) "Mexico will pay for the wall!" (El presidente Trump está jodidamente loco)', '>>{flickerkuu} : That actually doesnt accomplish anything by definition they are getting up front so downvoting isnt doing a thing.', ">>{UrukHaiGuyz} : > Hillary didn't grow up privileged lol. She absolutely did. Nothing like Trump money, but her father was a very successful textile business owner. They grew up in Park Ridge for crying out loud.", '>>{Lets_Go_Flyers} : But... but... without those posts this subreddit will be 100% "My phone is screwed up and I can\'t be bothered to actually use tech support or Google. Somebody diagnose it for me!!!!!"', ">>{hello3pat} : I know the winery that's doing it too is owned by his son (iirc he gifted it to him) however it looks like this is owned by Donald.", ">>{trtsmb} : If someone is on unemployment, working for 8 weeks and then going back to being unemployed will mess up their benefits and potentially leave them in a worse off position after the job ends. As far as the cook jobs, they can make the same wage working a permanent job at Chili's/Olive Garden/etc.", ">>{mxk31} : And I feel like a dick if I comment that so I just don't comment at all. Glad I'm not the only one that feels this way.", ">>{letdogsvote} : They both represent the extremely rich, and just go about it in different ways. Trump being all about himself, Hillary being all about generous friends with deep pockets that need favors. Neither represent average Americans and it's insulting to suggest they do.", ">>{emr1028} : Hillary didn't grow up poor but she didn't grow up rich either.", ">>{hammadurb} : Not true, people can still collect unemployment benefits if their temp job is paying less than what they're getting for unemployment, they would get the difference.", '>>{reanim8ed} : You can do a sticky weekly photos thread and just ban all other photo posts.', ">>{AnonymousSixSixSix} : I agree, plus the camera isn't even that good compared to *other* phones. *Expects downvotes because this sub is Hail Corporate*", '>>{oowowaee} : ...and somehow this is ok because it\'s Trump. Because doing this "makes [him] smart" or something? Oh wait, I am vaguely remembering this happening before and he was "indebted to shareholders".', ">>{-notausername_} : LOL it's there when I edit, I dunno why it isn't showing up", ">>{rrl_csci} : The rich getting richer while so many have stagnated wages or are living in poverty is why Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders did so well against Clinton and why she's having such a hard time gaining many people's support.", ">>{trtsmb} : If you're working full time for 8 weeks, odds are that it's going to disrupt your benefits since the paycheck will be higher and you may need to start the process of getting registered for unemployment all over. The other benefit people like Trump have over hiring foreign workers is they most likely do not speak English or know the safety regulations so are easier to intimidate and mistreat.", ">>{marksolomon32} : Is there a sub for complaining about subs? Because seriously, every sub is bombarded and clogged up with these low effort posts that just push down legitimate posts and complain about any posts that isn't new. If you want new posts that are different. Post some. Hey look there is that downvote button obviously the community has spoken if they are getting voted to the top.", ">>{wankthisway} : It ok sir we'll patch you up (Try putting three of them) ¯\\\\\\_(ツ)_/¯", '>>{viva_la_vinyl} : > "Buy American, hire American" my ass "Buy American, hire American"* ^*^Not ^^me ^^though.', ">>{WizardsVengeance} : That's just smart business. Hillary should have made it illegal if you don't like it.", '>>{Torger083} : Dude. Get hooked on phonics or something. Your syntax is atrocious.', ">>{kermityfrog} : So tempted to post a photo using a real camera. And having all these people wondering why their phones can't match it.", ">>{emr1028} : But I don't get why I'm supposed to be mad that she and her husband found success just because other people didn't. They worked their asses off for it.", '>>{loki0008} : Builders, businessmen and workers will choose a builder, a businessman and a worker, and liars, parasites, communists and cop killers will prefer Hillary.', '>>{rickshaw99} : Agreed! The press needs to find there long lost spine.', ">>{Nutcup} : Yeah, let's crack down on these like we did any beta talk. Look at how dead the thread is without any beta threads. I looked forward to those and now there isn't really much content to engage with. To each their own, I guess.", '>>{Cindernubblebutt} : You expect him to have to obey the laws of supply and demand when it comes to labor? Nah! Just bypass that pesky US labor market and hire foreigners.', ">>{letdogsvote} : Howabout we agree she grew up upper middle class with all the attendant benefits? Much more honest than trying to paint her as self made scrapper comin' up hard on the streets.", '>>{marksolomon32} : yeah when im on reddit. i really dont care about grammer or punctuation as long as i get the point across. (yes i am purposefully not capitalizing right now and ending sentences where a period should be. Also, your welcome. their going to love this. and whats the whether like for you?', '>>{another_sunnyday} : Before hiring foreign workers on a H-2 visa, he has to demonstrate that he "tried and failed" to find Americans to do the job. He does the bare minimum, running ads in the paper as briefly as possible during times they\'re least likely to be seen, then he says "Welp, no Americans want the jobs! Better get foreigners!" http://money.cnn.com/2016/12/22/news/companies/trump-foreign-workers/', ">>{Torger083} : I hope you get food poisoning. You're a terrible person.", '>>{marksolomon32} : Of all the things you could wish upon me, that is both cruel and reasonable. (I am sorry. I tried to start that sentence without a proposition, but I could never make it work.) edit: In all seriousness, you are right though. I should start to structure my sentences better and work on proper punctuation.', ">>{Blubbll} : > Every goddamn day That's what he said when being asked for 'how often do you need to charge your apple watch'", ">>{Blubbll} : Rules are for people who don't want to get banned. Also: obligatory r/itookapoop", ">>{emr1028} : I'm not painting her that way, she definitely didn't grow up in poverty like Bill did. It seems as if she grew up financially comfortable but without any luxury.", ">>{retrovertigo} : I agree with you. I have an iPhone 7 and I think the camera is very nice. But I have noticed an increase in photo posts talking about how amazing the camera is. Like you pointed out, rule one of this subreddit states: > 1. Image posts with iPhone photography will be removed. Try /r/iPhonePictures, /r/iphoneography, or /r/itookapicture. Mods, it's time to clean house.", '>>{crapyBird} : We should wait till iPhone 8, but then it\'s going to be "iPhone 8/Plus camera is amazing" :D', ">>{WispGB} : yes becuase we wouldn't want to miss all the 'apple has gone down hill since steve died' and 'apple is lacking innovation' posts....", ">>{WalterJrsBreakfast} : By definition, the system is working as it's supposed to. The majority of visitors to this sub believes that they're quality posts and therefore upvote them. Just because some posts don't interest some of us doesn't mean that they should be banned. I hated the content that was being shown on /r/applewatch, downvoting didn't help, so I unsubscribed.", ">>{sneakpeekbot} : **Here's a sneak peek of /r/AppleWatch using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/applewatch/top/?sort=top&t=all) of the year!** \\#1: [It's official, I will never not have an apple watch now.](https://np.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/5jqigu/its_official_i_will_never_not_have_an_apple_watch/) \\#2: [I spent last week developing a Spotify app that lets you sync playlists with your Apple Watch](https://np.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/5lsn9r/i_spent_last_week_developing_a_spotify_app_that/) \\#3: [Urge Spotify to Create an Apple Watch App. Vote!](https://community.spotify.com/t5/Live-Ideas/Spotify-on-Apple-Watch/idi-p/914915) | [110 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/5kg2rc/urge_spotify_to_create_an_apple_watch_app_vote/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/5lveo6/blacklist/)", ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : Eh... The only other camera that really looked better in some shots was the Pixel. I like the realistic look to photos rather than the yellowish look of photos you get from samsung phones. That's just my opinion though. I came over to iPhone from the LG G3, and while the main camera was great the selfie camera was so washed out I couldn't stand it.", '>>{jugalator} : I\'m starting to think it\'s Apple shills because it\'s one of the main features of the iPhone 7, more easy to demonstrate on reddit than "god I love how it was waterproof this day when this happened"... And you\'re right, many are average at best and I\'m left confused. It\'s still usually rather obvious they\'re from a smartphone.', '>>{penguished} : No she represents all the sleaziest fuckers of corporate America. Trump just represents one.', ">>{utnow} : > Glad I'm not the only one that feels this way. Literally the reason for circle jerks. <3", '>>{saintcmb} : I cant imagine being a billionaire and under paying the people who make my food.', '>>{UrukHaiGuyz} : Nope, no speechwriter worth anything would let a nomination acceptance speech contain any language remotely like "I wasn\'t privileged". She did talk about her mom being poor as a kid though and her dad doing well in the [speech](http://www.npr.org/2016/07/28/487817725/fact-check-hillary-clintons-speech-to-the-democratic-convention-annotated): >When the war was over, he started his own small business, printing fabric for draperies. I remember watching him stand for hours over silk screens. >He wanted to give my brothers and me opportunities he never had. And he did. >My mother, Dorothy, was abandoned by her parents as a young girl. She ended up on her own at 14, working as a housemaid. She was saved by the kindness of others. >Her first-grade teacher saw she had nothing to eat at lunch and brought extra food to share the entire year. The lesson she passed on to me, years later, stuck with me: No one gets through life alone. We have to look out for each other and lift each other up.', ">>{rrl_csci} : I'd be concerned that so much of the wealth is concentrated in the top 1%. Almost 50% of global wealth is owned by the top 1%. While ~70% of the globe makes under $10,000 a year. That is the problem, that is what should make you upset. Why do you have an issue with wealth being more evenly distributed and why are you ok with so much wealth being held in the hands of the few?", ">>{nakkh} : It's *opposite day* for the next 4 years.", ">>{vagif} : There's none. They are in perfect harmony of blissful ignorance, xenophobia and religion.", '>>{quipsquaff} : I think at this point most Americans would piss on him for free.', ">>{emr1028} : You're completely strawmanning what I am saying. I have an issue with the current concentration of wealth at the top. That much is obviously bad for society. I do not have an issue with someone earning wealth. I do not that that being successful is a bad thing.", '>>{fish_slap_republic} : Hillary is in bed with Goldman Sachs! (Adds multiple Goldman Sachs people to administration)', ">>{bernieaccountess} : oh good, cause if it came outta her mouth i wouldn't tust it as far as i could [throw them](http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/democratic-convention-seats-caught-fill-look/) but i find it hard to see how she could take those humble beginings, and just checked them at the door", '>>{SpeedoCheeto} : You keep using that word... pretty sure you mean the opposite', ">>{rrl_csci} : I'm not saying that being successful is wrong, but that success should not bring you so much income that hundreds or thousands of others, just as hard working, are barely scraping by. I also don't think it's an accurate assessment to call Clinton representative of America when she and Trump are both part of and representative of the top 1% in the country/world.", ">>{Bobzebra} : True. But she did all that while you were paying her. And while she was working for you she lied about her job performance and she hid her work product from you. She also took money, while working for you, and used it to pay her political minions (through the CF), taking money from some of the most repressive regimes on the planet: who think killing homosexuals is a great idea and that women should be beaten for driving a car and that its ok to have slaves. she then runs a rigged campaign purporting to support gays women and minorities. She lies incessantly, ask the fbi. She won't hold a press conference or disclose what she told the likes of Goldman Saks, evidently that was worth almost a quarter million dollars for twenty minutes of her time. ? And she represents who?", '>>{emr1028} : Her being successful has nothing to do with other people being poor. Hundreds of millions of people around the globe are better off because of the work that she and her husband had done over the last forty years.', ">>{Player1Mario} : So you've never used a 7 + camera then. Got it.", '>>{BLACK-AND-DICKER} : Yeah i think we just need more/new mods. Who actually enforce the rules. (I volunteer as tribute, if need be.)', ">>{Trumpmeister} : Don't forget about Hillary getting her brother the first gold mining permits in Haiti in 50 years.", ">>{puterTDI} : Honestly, I think it's likely to have a lot more to do with the person taking the picture than the camera used. Something that stuck with my was a photography class I took that brought in a pro photographer. She had gotten tired of the infatuation in the industry with technology and how it seemed like the attitude was that the camera made the photographer. To counter that she went out and did this really amazing project where all of the photos were taking with a cheap $30 point and shoot film camera, just to make the point that lighting, composition, etc. were all far more important than how much you spent on the camera.", '>>{pw5a29} : Guess we need to suggest Apple to nerf the next iPhone :p', '>>{emr1028} : There is a difference between growing up not needing to worry about putting food on the table and growing up hanging out on yachts and private jets.', ">>{ConstanceVigilant} : They've always responded right away when I've messaged them and removed the offending posts. They just don't seem to know they need to check the modqueue manually. Possibly they think reporting a post will highlight the mod icon next to the orangered. But if they need mods I volunteer too!", '>>{MilkyPuff} : Hiring decisions at a golf club are made by operations managers, many ranks below the president of the parent holding organization. This is like blaming Steve Jobs for an Apple store in Maryland hiring an illegal alien to work a cash register. Donald Trump himself likely had absolutely nothing to do with this.', ">>{FrederikTwn} : Am I the only one who feels the same way about the android > IPhone converts. I don't actually care, and the fact that you feel we'll all care about your opinion/ decisions, is honestly very self absorbed.", '>>{Tattered_Mind} : Cognitive dissonance causes discomfort for holding two opposing thoughts, these people feel no discomfort', ">>{RubyRubyRoo} : It might be since this is /r/iphone the mods are using reddit iPhone apps and as we all know there aren't any good reddit apps to mod with.", '>>{Kumqwatwhat} : Buy American, Hire American ^This ^offer ^not ^valid ^in ^all ^counties. ^Must ^be ^Republican ^to ^apply. ^Do ^not ^attempt ^to ^use ^"Buy ^American, ^Hire ^American" ^brand ^products ^if ^you ^are ^a ^minority, ^woman, ^or ^have ^annual ^income ^less ^than ^200,000 ^dollars. ^Use ^of ^"Buy ^American, ^Hire ^American" ^with ^other ^prescription ^marketing ^may ^cause ^some ^side ^effects ^such ^as ^but ^not ^limited ^to ^lying, ^obfuscation, ^corruption, ^cognitive ^dissonance, ^or ^fascism. ^Other ^terms ^and ^conditions ^may ^apply. ^Check ^with ^your ^state ^legislature ^for ^details.', ">>{rhino910} : She represents unions, women, children and workers, but hey don't let those facts interfere", '>>{rhino910} : I don\'t think you understand the meaning of "narcissistic" That is all about self love and being self absorbed. A good example would be when Trump says "only I can fix America"', '>>{twizzle101} : Maybe we should have a weekly thread! Post your iPhone photography to it or something.', '>>{SoCalDawg} : I figured it was a response to recent issues with the camera.', '>>{lennybrucebruce} : That\'s the "now-cast" which would potentially be the outcome if the election was held today, right now. Check out the "polls-plus" forecast which aggregates all the polls and forecasts and Hillary is 61.7% to Trump\'s 38.3%', ">>{shitiforgotmypasswor} : This. If the operator knows what he's doing, he can do better than 99% of the iPhoners with mostly any camera.", '>>{GroundPorter} : I will be calling the white house and demand that a 50% tariff be applied to all goods and services being sold in Mar-a-Lago. MAGA!!!!', ">>{NotAPimecone} : Of course he didn't personally hire the staff. But, he's made a *YUGE* deal about his stance on ~~illegal~~ immigrants, so one would think he would make some sort of effort to enforce the policy in his own operations.", ">>{KindfOfABigDeal} : Actually since I know he'd like it, now I don't want to. So checkmate for Trump I guess.", ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : I can't tell the difference between my 6S plus and all these 7 plus photos. I've owned the 7 plus in the beginning, returned it. Not different enough to justify the $869 I spent on it. Holding off for this years, hopefully it's worth the wait.", ">>{AlmostFamousGuy} : That's laughable. All these narcissistic traits apply to Hillary: * They believe rules and laws do not apply to them. * They always seek out leadership roles * When confronted with issues the narcissist will go into complete denial, often attacking the other party with accusations in a poor attempt at defending themselves * They are strongly averse to criticism. * They always manage to make the conversation about themselves * They often show arrogant, haughty [rude and abusive] behaviors or attitudes. * Have a sense of entitlement. * Lacks empathy: is unable to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others. (Benghazi) * They make excuses and blame others", ">>{Beard_o_Bees} : I've already committed to pissing on his grave. He's only got another 10 years left on that sad sack of a carcass.", ">>{Mattallica} : There's alien blue and I know at least one of the mods uses it to moderate the subreddit.", ">>{Mattallica} : Yeah, it's listed in the rules in the sidebar: >Image posts with iPhone photography will be removed. Try /r/iPhonePictures, /r/iphoneography, or /r/itookapicture.", '>>{Grizzly_Corey} : If Trump wants to behave like he is running a business, then the actions of the company land squarely at his feet. It was like this already being president, however he would simply shuck and jive out of the way.', ">>{sneakpeekbot} : **Here's a sneak peek of /r/iphonepictures using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/top/?sort=top&t=all) of the year!** \\#1: [Everything Need Know iPhone 7 Price,Release Date,Features](http://www.telecominfo.org/everything-need-know-iphone-7-pricerelease-datefeatures/) | [0 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/4wm9dm/everything_need_know_iphone_7_pricerelease/) \\#2: [I was told y'all might like these bee pics, shot with my 7+](http://imgur.com/a/buQF9) | [6 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/5bmyh9/i_was_told_yall_might_like_these_bee_pics_shot/) \\#3: [Rejected 'Shot on iPhone' Commercial](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGlDsQRUQXA) | [0 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/55bj7b/rejected_shot_on_iphone_commercial/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/5lveo6/blacklist/)", ">>{Beard_o_Bees} : You'd think that he would, you know, *lead by example?* You'd think.", '>>{Beard_o_Bees} : I wonder how much a Taco Bowl is going for at Mar-a-Lago?', '>>{Addsurge} : Probably just have to wait for the iPhone 8 camera to come out!', ">>{cliff99} : Getting his companies involved with the h-2b program was something that Trump would have been aware of and most likely would have had to approve. Claiming ignorance on Trump's part is disingenuous.", ">>{CALL_ME_ISHMAEBY} : Everybody knows Apple people don't understand computers. ^/s", '>>{Obiwontaun} : Can confirm. Am American, would not piss on him if he were on fire.', '>>{unreqistered} : >All these posts literally break rule 1 and nothing is done about it. If only I could use my iPhone 7 to take a picture of these crocodile tears.', ">>{ruiner8850} : He says that Americans won't do the job which is why he had to hire foreign workers. No, Americans won't do the job for what you want to pay them and how you want to be able to treat them. When people won't do your job under those conditions the answer is to increase their wages and treat them better, not to bring them in from out of the country. The guy goes on and on about bringing jobs back, but when it's his businesses he doesn't give a shit at all about Americans. To him it's not about paying an American a decent wage, it's about finding which foreigners are willing to do it the cheapest.", '>>{A_FVCKING_UNICORN} : Lol, no On a side note, when will his support start to wake up?', '>>{littletomcallahan} : My 7 plus pics are not much better than my 6.', '>>{littletomcallahan} : Glad to hear you say this. Does everyone have really low standards, or are they paid trolls because the camera performance is nowhere near as advertised or bragged about on here.', '>>{littletomcallahan} : Check out this Apple support thread of all the disappointed customers: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7691303?start=570&tstart=0', ">>{prodigiousmuscle} : I'll dump some Everclear on him in that case.", '>>{cliff99} : He turns away US citizens who apply there, most likely because the h-2b workers are less likely to complain about working conditions or unpaid overtime since they can be deported if they do.', '>>{littletomcallahan} : Can we talk about [this topic](ie me) for a minute?', '>>{BlueMacaw} : It might help if the actual rules were posted in the sidebar, and not just a link to the rules.', ">>{Lightalife} : Weren't so bad, so we hired them ourselves!", '>>{cliff99} : The whole "we couldn\'t find anyone for the job" is a longstanding joke with h-1bs I\'m guessing it is for h-2bs as well.', ">>{alphabets00p} : I have no issue with hiring foreign workers. I've worked many jobs with foreign workers and have found them to be valuable assets and my relationships with them have always been enriching. I do have a problem with this utter hypocrisy and lack of personal accountability. The simplest way to lead is to lead by example and Trump's inability to do even that is just one more sign of the disaster that lies ahead.", '>>{CFJ561} : As someone who lives 15 minutes away from this place, I can assure you the "no one wants seasonal jobs, we can\'t find anyone to hire" rhetoric is complete bullshit.', '>>{dsmith422} : It is owned by one of his hundreds of corporate entities. It should be either Mar A Lago Club, Inc or Mar A Lago LLC. He is President/Treasurer/Secretary of the former and Member/President of the second. The info is in his financial disclosure form.', ">>{MilkyPuff} : All businesses are basically just liquid that fill the shape of the regulatory container that they operate in. You can't afford to vastly overpay labor if your competition doesn't. He has a chance as president to modify the regulatory environment for h-2b workers so that it's not an option for *any* business, and nobody will be at a competitive disadvantage when it's no longer an option. As a private citizen, he had a fiduciary duty to the company to operate it in a way that maximizes success. You can literally be sued by the board for failure to meet this standard. Until he modifies the program nationwide, it would have been entirely irresponsible and potentially illegal to vastly overpay labor when h-2b workers were available.", ">>{MilkyPuff} : The claims about his help at Mar-a-Lago aren't that the workers are illegal, it's that they're seasonal immigrants here on legal visas.", ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : 6S Plus is what I'm comparing it to. The 6 had a 8mp camera without OIS. The 6S Plus had a 12mp with OIS just like the 7 plus.", ">>{MilkyPuff} : > All businesses are basically just liquid that fill the shape of the regulatory container that they operate in. You can't afford to vastly overpay labor if your competition doesn't. He has a chance as president to modify the regulatory environment for h-2b workers so that it's not an option for any business, and nobody will be at a competitive disadvantage when it's no longer an option. > As a private citizen, he had a fiduciary duty to the company to operate it in a way that maximizes success. You can literally be sued by the board for failure to meet this standard. Until he modifies the program nationwide, it would have been entirely irresponsible and potentially illegal to vastly overpay labor when h-2b workers were available.", ">>{Casey--} : An uninteresting subject and mediocre composition, but it has shallow DOF so it's soooo pretty!!!", '>>{littletomcallahan} : I know. I was saying that the improvement is so unnoticeable that even a regular 6 produces not much worse photos.', ">>{MilkyPuff} : >All businesses are basically just liquid that fill the shape of the regulatory container that they operate in. You can't afford to vastly overpay labor if your competition doesn't. He has a chance as president to modify the regulatory environment for h-2b workers so that it's not an option for any business, and nobody will be at a competitive disadvantage when it's no longer an option. As a private citizen, he had a fiduciary duty to the company to operate it in a way that maximizes success. You can literally be sued by the board for failure to meet this standard. Until he modifies the program nationwide, it would have been entirely irresponsible and potentially illegal to vastly overpay labor when h-2b workers were available.", ">>{NotAPimecone} : Fair enough, but he's not too fond of legal immigrants and legal foreign workers either, right? Those jobs should go to hardworking Americans!", ">>{MilkyPuff} : Yes. Those jobs *should* go to Americans. Which is why laws to limit or eliminate the h-b1 and h-b2 visas should be enacted. This would need to be the law of the land before it can be implemented in organizations on the scale of Trump's. If Trump goes 4 years without addressing this issue, he deserves scorn. But doing it prior to being elected was a legal impossibility.", '>>{Dinkdinkdata} : Oh sorry. I thought you said you could see a difference between the two. Ya honestly even the 5S takes a great photo.', ">>{cliff99} : You do know that hiring h-1bs and h-2bs while turning down qualified US citizens is illegal right? Fiduciary duty usually doesn't include breaking the law. And I almost forgot, it's also illegal to pay an h-2b less than the prevailing wage for that job, so if Trump's doing that he's breaking the law twice.", '>>{rudedood} : I use the desktop version of Reddit in Safari.', ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : I don't. Like I said the 5S had a great camera at 8.", ">>{Takeabyte} : Why? It's not like there's much news or content on here anyway.", ">>{Metriacanthosaurus} : Who cares? What are the legitimate posts you're missing out on? People posting status updates of how their matte black finish is holding up? Or even better complaints about Siri from people with obvious speech issues? iPhone photography ought to be welcome.", '>>{kankaswag} : they wont post to other subreddits where they wont get any attention, this sub gives those posts up votes', '>>{MilkyPuff} : Ahh, but you see, giant companies have dozens of lawyers to manipulate the definition of "qualified US citizens" and find the narrow path through. So long as all your competition has the same legal resources, the practice is de facto legal. It must be outright illegal, or the right lawyers will always find a route through.', '>>{TsukasaAcelyon} : This is the reason I unsubscribed from there. I tried a post like this to get the mods to make a mega thread or something where people can post pics of their stock watch and feel good about themselves but it got downvoted to hell.', '>>{TsukasaAcelyon} : Need to have three \\ Like this ¯\\ \\ \\_(ツ)_/¯ But without the space in-between', '>>{throbo} : Comments to post are very high. Although over 30 days old it seems very relevant.', '>>{cliff99} : It is outright illegal. You\'re talking about jobs like janitors and food servers here, if the federal government had enforced the law Trump\'s "not qualified to be a janitor" argument would have been laughed out of court. Trump knew it wasn\'t being enforced and therefore chose to break the law.', ">>{MilkyPuff} : And OJ was guilty as fucking sin. A good lawyer wins every time, dude. Especially when it's common practice to contribute to judges' reelections- another systemic problem not unique to the Trump organization.", ">>{NotAPimecone} : It's ***impossible*** to hire American workers unless there's a law forcing you to? Or just ***less profitable***?", ">>{kewlfocus} : Yes and a skilled photographer can do amazing things with an iPhone as well. I'm a professional Photojournalist and photo editor and I love the 7 plus camera.", '>>{MilkyPuff} : The two are one in the same when a fiduciary standard applies.', '>>{kewlfocus} : I think meta posts like this are more annoying, just downvote and move on.', '>>{NotAPimecone} : That is how I understand the concept of fiduciary duty to be commonly applied (and, naturally, how shareholders in a corporation want it applied); however, legally, my understanding (limited, IANAL, educate me) is that it is defined as a requirement to act in good faith, without negligence, in the best interests of the party to which the duty is owed. This does not necessarily equate to a duty to maximize profits. http://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/fiduciary-duty-what-it-and-what-does-it-impose-upon-you https://medium.com/bull-market/there-is-no-effective-fiduciary-duty-to-maximize-profits-939ae50d0572#.apk7r73ly', '>>{dirtmaster} : There was a post yesterday with someone saying "wow look at this night time shot of the empire state building its fucking amazing" I was thinking to my self, if this guy saw what current DSLRs are capable of he would shit bricks. I didnt want to say anything as hes having fun but yea its annoying.', ">>{Gizmotoy} : The portrait mode ones really are the worst. A good portion of the time they're not uploaded at full quality, and even then you can see where the two images were stitched together. It's an OK effect, but most of the ones I've seen probably would have been better with full DOF and no stitching seams. That's my opinion, anyway. On the plus side, the low light performance seems genuinely improved. Not enough to warrant an upgrade from my 6S Plus, but a nice bump in quality regardless.", '>>{seleccionespecial} : Copying and pasting this does not make it true. Find me a successful case where a board was sued by a shareholder for hiring American citizens over immigrants. You won\'t. Want to know why? Because the business judgment rule. You can think of millions of reasons to hire Americans over immigrants, even if it costs more. "It will better our standing with our customers who appreciate that commitment." "American made is a successful branding tactic." ETC ETC ETC. No court is going to step in on that.', ">>{seleccionespecial} : OP doesn't know what he is talking about. Hiring American citizens over immigrants, EVEN if it costs more, would likely fall under the business judgment rule and is fine. Especially for a CEO who harps on hating immigrants and wanting things American made.", '>>{paulmgm} : Pretty much the same over at /r/vaporents.', ">>{rr90013} : I feel like the camera isn't even all that good. My 7+ telephoto pics always look like they have some photoshop watercolor filter on them when I zoom In.", '>>{shitiforgotmypasswor} : Obviously you are the exception on the thread then...', ">>{FoxMcWeezer} : There's a sub dedicated to low-effort posts. /r/shitpost", ">>{FreakTalent} : but you see the reason i decided to switch is... yeah i don't really give a shit. It's a phone, Apple isn't paying me to welcome every new customer. At least these convert posts are not THAT common, it would get annoying very fast.", ">>{Captain_Jirk} : No, the mods don't really do shit on reddit.", '>>{downnheavy} : Equivalent to a random co-worker showing "my two angels" baby and cat photos, I sincerely don\'t give a shit if it\'s not mine .', '>>{v8xd} : Complainers gonna complain. Seriously just skip them, no-one is forcing you to read them.', ">>{gaymerRaver} : Oh man, I've had my watch for around a month did a obligatory arm watch pic straight away on there. Now I just feel like a dick lol. Still glad to join the subreddit.", ">>{santaisafraud} : To be fair it's most likely users who have only experienced depth of field for the first time. I still remember how giddy I was when I got my first 50mm prime. Thinking every photo I took looks professional. Looking back now they were all mostly shit. I'm not hating, I enjoy that a new wave of customers are enjoying things like this but I do appreciate that it's mediocre photos for the most part.", ">>{insertnamehere987} : I've made a post just like this about 2 months ago, well received, mods didn't do shit. There's literally a sub for iPhone pictures.", '>>{mayaisme} : And the leather case posts please! It\'s literally people posting dirty cases saying "look how nice dirty leather looks ngrrrrr!"', '>>{thebuggalo} : Definitely need our weekly "Day 1 vs Day 30 Saddle Brown Leather Case" post. Seems like there is always someone thinking he is doing the world a service by posting this.', ">>{thebuggalo} : I work right by the ESB, that picture was garbage. I've taken better looking photos with my 6S or even my 6 two years ago. If anything this sub as proved to me that the only reason I would think to upgrade to iPhone 7 (the camera) is not worth it.", ">>{bbllaakkee} : or the fucking leather case wearing, Jesus Christ. its leather. it's going to wear...", '>>{dirtmaster} : I love the phone but if i want good photos ill break out my nikon.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{reallyjay} : Minimum wage in Palm Beach is $8.05 an hour. He's hiring these workers at between $11 to $13 an hour. If our citizens are so desperate for employment, why are these jobs going unfilled? How is Trump making money off this? He stiffs them on hours? What? There's got to be a loop hole.", '>>{President_Tantrump} : Clientele loves the foreign help! Treat your supporters right - POTUS', '>>{Kanye_Westeroz} : The cognitive dissonance that is going on between Trump voters and the Republicans who endorse him is staggering and scary', ">>{altCognito} : I'm honestly a little confused. You're not supposed to be able to hire H1-Bs for less than the prevailing wage, and I thought it was only supposed to apply to tech positions. I would think that tech companies who compete for these jobs would raise a bigger stink about this. What's up with that?", ">>{Joegotbored} : He doubled membership from 100k to 200k recently but can't afford American staff?", ">>{rubenol} : You're confusing H-2B with H-1B. H-2B is for temporary labour work. It's still a laughably hypocritical thing to do, but that's the distinction.", ">>{TinyBaron} : If he didn't want this kind of scrutiny he shouldn't have run for office.", ">>{trtsmb} : He apparently also can't afford to pay decent wages considering how expensive that part of Florida is.", '>>{vootator} : Not sure how it works in other sectors, but in my world companies hire H1 labor because the company can keep them around for years and not pay them a dime in benefits.', ">>{Lyin_Don} : it's going to be america first. america first.", ">>{anonuisance} : > However, hiring workers from abroad seems to contradict Trump’s public pronouncements. The president-elect has publicly shamed Carrier Corp., Ford Motor and others for their decisions to move manufacturing jobs to Mexico. > Neither Trump’s transition team nor Mar-a-Lago’s manager responded to requests for comment. During a March presidential debate, Trump defended his hiring of foreign workers. > “It’s very, very hard to get people,” Trump said. “Other hotels do the exact same thing.” > CareerSource Palm Beach County, a nonprofit job placement agency, says it knows plenty of American citizens willing to work at Mar-a-Lago. > “We have hundreds of qualified candidates and hundreds of job orders for various hospitality positions such as servers, chefs, cooks, bartenders, housekeeping, guest services, spa services, recreation, maintenance and more,” CareerSource spokesman Tom Veenstra said. Fascinating. Is this one of the businesses his sons who absolutely don't talk to him are running?", ">>{trtsmb} : Most people don't want to take a temporary low wage job and then have to look for another job in 8-10 weeks. H2B visas are for temp work. His son is doing the exact same thing at the winery he owns.", ">>{hammadurb} : If he hired Americans, he would have to pay a more competitive wage which is higher than he's paying the foreign workers. The foreign workers can't just quit and go to work at another place which pays more.", '>>{Pollo_Jack} : If you ignore the percentage yearly increases then yes he is paying more. Even if it was just a one percent increase it would cost less to hire a new person at ten cents more instead of a letting an experienced person keep their pay for twenty cents or so more. Ultimately a small savings in wages at the cost of training and dealing with less experienced people. For example, the savings are negated by the persons first broken plate.', '>>{hammadurb} : Most people would rather have the temp job for however long it is rather than not having a job.', ">>{c0pypastry} : He doesn't even hire Americans to piss on him. Sad!", '>>{hello3pat} : These are H2 which apparently means even shorter temp work.', '>>{Itsprobablysarcasm} : Buy American! (My daughter\'s shit is made in 3rd world nations) "Hire American!" (Ignore the pipeline of foreigners working for me) "I\'m the greatest negotiator!" (Gives Canadian company permission to pipe Canadian oil through America to sell to the Chinese) "I won the popular vote!" (A German golfer said so) "Mexico will pay for the wall!" (El presidente Trump está jodidamente loco)', ">>{hello3pat} : I know the winery that's doing it too is owned by his son (iirc he gifted it to him) however it looks like this is owned by Donald.", ">>{trtsmb} : If someone is on unemployment, working for 8 weeks and then going back to being unemployed will mess up their benefits and potentially leave them in a worse off position after the job ends. As far as the cook jobs, they can make the same wage working a permanent job at Chili's/Olive Garden/etc.", ">>{hammadurb} : Not true, people can still collect unemployment benefits if their temp job is paying less than what they're getting for unemployment, they would get the difference.", '>>{oowowaee} : ...and somehow this is ok because it\'s Trump. Because doing this "makes [him] smart" or something? Oh wait, I am vaguely remembering this happening before and he was "indebted to shareholders".', ">>{trtsmb} : If you're working full time for 8 weeks, odds are that it's going to disrupt your benefits since the paycheck will be higher and you may need to start the process of getting registered for unemployment all over. The other benefit people like Trump have over hiring foreign workers is they most likely do not speak English or know the safety regulations so are easier to intimidate and mistreat.", '>>{viva_la_vinyl} : > "Buy American, hire American" my ass "Buy American, hire American"* ^*^Not ^^me ^^though.', ">>{WizardsVengeance} : That's just smart business. Hillary should have made it illegal if you don't like it.", '>>{rickshaw99} : Agreed! The press needs to find there long lost spine.', '>>{Cindernubblebutt} : You expect him to have to obey the laws of supply and demand when it comes to labor? Nah! Just bypass that pesky US labor market and hire foreigners.', '>>{another_sunnyday} : Before hiring foreign workers on a H-2 visa, he has to demonstrate that he "tried and failed" to find Americans to do the job. He does the bare minimum, running ads in the paper as briefly as possible during times they\'re least likely to be seen, then he says "Welp, no Americans want the jobs! Better get foreigners!" http://money.cnn.com/2016/12/22/news/companies/trump-foreign-workers/', '>>{saintcmb} : I cant imagine being a billionaire and under paying the people who make my food.', ">>{nakkh} : It's *opposite day* for the next 4 years.", ">>{vagif} : There's none. They are in perfect harmony of blissful ignorance, xenophobia and religion.", '>>{quipsquaff} : I think at this point most Americans would piss on him for free.', '>>{fish_slap_republic} : Hillary is in bed with Goldman Sachs! (Adds multiple Goldman Sachs people to administration)', '>>{SpeedoCheeto} : You keep using that word... pretty sure you mean the opposite', '>>{MilkyPuff} : Hiring decisions at a golf club are made by operations managers, many ranks below the president of the parent holding organization. This is like blaming Steve Jobs for an Apple store in Maryland hiring an illegal alien to work a cash register. Donald Trump himself likely had absolutely nothing to do with this.', '>>{Tattered_Mind} : Cognitive dissonance causes discomfort for holding two opposing thoughts, these people feel no discomfort', '>>{Kumqwatwhat} : Buy American, Hire American ^This ^offer ^not ^valid ^in ^all ^counties. ^Must ^be ^Republican ^to ^apply. ^Do ^not ^attempt ^to ^use ^"Buy ^American, ^Hire ^American" ^brand ^products ^if ^you ^are ^a ^minority, ^woman, ^or ^have ^annual ^income ^less ^than ^200,000 ^dollars. ^Use ^of ^"Buy ^American, ^Hire ^American" ^with ^other ^prescription ^marketing ^may ^cause ^some ^side ^effects ^such ^as ^but ^not ^limited ^to ^lying, ^obfuscation, ^corruption, ^cognitive ^dissonance, ^or ^fascism. ^Other ^terms ^and ^conditions ^may ^apply. ^Check ^with ^your ^state ^legislature ^for ^details.', '>>{GroundPorter} : I will be calling the white house and demand that a 50% tariff be applied to all goods and services being sold in Mar-a-Lago. MAGA!!!!', ">>{NotAPimecone} : Of course he didn't personally hire the staff. But, he's made a *YUGE* deal about his stance on ~~illegal~~ immigrants, so one would think he would make some sort of effort to enforce the policy in his own operations.", ">>{KindfOfABigDeal} : Actually since I know he'd like it, now I don't want to. So checkmate for Trump I guess.", ">>{Beard_o_Bees} : I've already committed to pissing on his grave. He's only got another 10 years left on that sad sack of a carcass.", '>>{Grizzly_Corey} : If Trump wants to behave like he is running a business, then the actions of the company land squarely at his feet. It was like this already being president, however he would simply shuck and jive out of the way.', ">>{Beard_o_Bees} : You'd think that he would, you know, *lead by example?* You'd think.", '>>{Beard_o_Bees} : I wonder how much a Taco Bowl is going for at Mar-a-Lago?', ">>{cliff99} : Getting his companies involved with the h-2b program was something that Trump would have been aware of and most likely would have had to approve. Claiming ignorance on Trump's part is disingenuous.", '>>{Obiwontaun} : Can confirm. Am American, would not piss on him if he were on fire.', ">>{ruiner8850} : He says that Americans won't do the job which is why he had to hire foreign workers. No, Americans won't do the job for what you want to pay them and how you want to be able to treat them. When people won't do your job under those conditions the answer is to increase their wages and treat them better, not to bring them in from out of the country. The guy goes on and on about bringing jobs back, but when it's his businesses he doesn't give a shit at all about Americans. To him it's not about paying an American a decent wage, it's about finding which foreigners are willing to do it the cheapest.", '>>{A_FVCKING_UNICORN} : Lol, no On a side note, when will his support start to wake up?', ">>{prodigiousmuscle} : I'll dump some Everclear on him in that case.", '>>{cliff99} : He turns away US citizens who apply there, most likely because the h-2b workers are less likely to complain about working conditions or unpaid overtime since they can be deported if they do.', ">>{Lightalife} : Weren't so bad, so we hired them ourselves!", '>>{cliff99} : The whole "we couldn\'t find anyone for the job" is a longstanding joke with h-1bs I\'m guessing it is for h-2bs as well.', ">>{alphabets00p} : I have no issue with hiring foreign workers. I've worked many jobs with foreign workers and have found them to be valuable assets and my relationships with them have always been enriching. I do have a problem with this utter hypocrisy and lack of personal accountability. The simplest way to lead is to lead by example and Trump's inability to do even that is just one more sign of the disaster that lies ahead.", '>>{CFJ561} : As someone who lives 15 minutes away from this place, I can assure you the "no one wants seasonal jobs, we can\'t find anyone to hire" rhetoric is complete bullshit.', '>>{dsmith422} : It is owned by one of his hundreds of corporate entities. It should be either Mar A Lago Club, Inc or Mar A Lago LLC. He is President/Treasurer/Secretary of the former and Member/President of the second. The info is in his financial disclosure form.', ">>{MilkyPuff} : All businesses are basically just liquid that fill the shape of the regulatory container that they operate in. You can't afford to vastly overpay labor if your competition doesn't. He has a chance as president to modify the regulatory environment for h-2b workers so that it's not an option for *any* business, and nobody will be at a competitive disadvantage when it's no longer an option. As a private citizen, he had a fiduciary duty to the company to operate it in a way that maximizes success. You can literally be sued by the board for failure to meet this standard. Until he modifies the program nationwide, it would have been entirely irresponsible and potentially illegal to vastly overpay labor when h-2b workers were available.", ">>{MilkyPuff} : The claims about his help at Mar-a-Lago aren't that the workers are illegal, it's that they're seasonal immigrants here on legal visas.", ">>{MilkyPuff} : > All businesses are basically just liquid that fill the shape of the regulatory container that they operate in. You can't afford to vastly overpay labor if your competition doesn't. He has a chance as president to modify the regulatory environment for h-2b workers so that it's not an option for any business, and nobody will be at a competitive disadvantage when it's no longer an option. > As a private citizen, he had a fiduciary duty to the company to operate it in a way that maximizes success. You can literally be sued by the board for failure to meet this standard. Until he modifies the program nationwide, it would have been entirely irresponsible and potentially illegal to vastly overpay labor when h-2b workers were available.", ">>{MilkyPuff} : >All businesses are basically just liquid that fill the shape of the regulatory container that they operate in. You can't afford to vastly overpay labor if your competition doesn't. He has a chance as president to modify the regulatory environment for h-2b workers so that it's not an option for any business, and nobody will be at a competitive disadvantage when it's no longer an option. As a private citizen, he had a fiduciary duty to the company to operate it in a way that maximizes success. You can literally be sued by the board for failure to meet this standard. Until he modifies the program nationwide, it would have been entirely irresponsible and potentially illegal to vastly overpay labor when h-2b workers were available.", ">>{NotAPimecone} : Fair enough, but he's not too fond of legal immigrants and legal foreign workers either, right? Those jobs should go to hardworking Americans!", ">>{MilkyPuff} : Yes. Those jobs *should* go to Americans. Which is why laws to limit or eliminate the h-b1 and h-b2 visas should be enacted. This would need to be the law of the land before it can be implemented in organizations on the scale of Trump's. If Trump goes 4 years without addressing this issue, he deserves scorn. But doing it prior to being elected was a legal impossibility.", ">>{cliff99} : You do know that hiring h-1bs and h-2bs while turning down qualified US citizens is illegal right? Fiduciary duty usually doesn't include breaking the law. And I almost forgot, it's also illegal to pay an h-2b less than the prevailing wage for that job, so if Trump's doing that he's breaking the law twice.", '>>{MilkyPuff} : Ahh, but you see, giant companies have dozens of lawyers to manipulate the definition of "qualified US citizens" and find the narrow path through. So long as all your competition has the same legal resources, the practice is de facto legal. It must be outright illegal, or the right lawyers will always find a route through.', '>>{throbo} : Comments to post are very high. Although over 30 days old it seems very relevant.', '>>{cliff99} : It is outright illegal. You\'re talking about jobs like janitors and food servers here, if the federal government had enforced the law Trump\'s "not qualified to be a janitor" argument would have been laughed out of court. Trump knew it wasn\'t being enforced and therefore chose to break the law.', ">>{MilkyPuff} : And OJ was guilty as fucking sin. A good lawyer wins every time, dude. Especially when it's common practice to contribute to judges' reelections- another systemic problem not unique to the Trump organization.", ">>{NotAPimecone} : It's ***impossible*** to hire American workers unless there's a law forcing you to? Or just ***less profitable***?", '>>{MilkyPuff} : The two are one in the same when a fiduciary standard applies.', '>>{NotAPimecone} : That is how I understand the concept of fiduciary duty to be commonly applied (and, naturally, how shareholders in a corporation want it applied); however, legally, my understanding (limited, IANAL, educate me) is that it is defined as a requirement to act in good faith, without negligence, in the best interests of the party to which the duty is owed. This does not necessarily equate to a duty to maximize profits. http://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/fiduciary-duty-what-it-and-what-does-it-impose-upon-you https://medium.com/bull-market/there-is-no-effective-fiduciary-duty-to-maximize-profits-939ae50d0572#.apk7r73ly', '>>{seleccionespecial} : Copying and pasting this does not make it true. Find me a successful case where a board was sued by a shareholder for hiring American citizens over immigrants. You won\'t. Want to know why? Because the business judgment rule. You can think of millions of reasons to hire Americans over immigrants, even if it costs more. "It will better our standing with our customers who appreciate that commitment." "American made is a successful branding tactic." ETC ETC ETC. No court is going to step in on that.', ">>{seleccionespecial} : OP doesn't know what he is talking about. Hiring American citizens over immigrants, EVEN if it costs more, would likely fall under the business judgment rule and is fine. Especially for a CEO who harps on hating immigrants and wanting things American made."], ['>>{Topher1999} : [Meta] Can we do something about the constant floods of "iPhone 7/Plus camera is amazing?"', ">>{BritishTrash} : I agree, too many of these posts. I'll just report and move on. Maybe a mega thread would help?", '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : I\'m more fed up with the stupid spam blog posts about how the iPhone 8 is going to be "hand crafted by god himself to look like a Galaxy S7 in this shitty render" than I am about nice pictures. Or the youtube videos about "how this emoji text will brick your iPhone lol try it on ur frends".', ">>{Lord_Von_Fappington} : Agreed. I mean, they're great considering it's a camera in a phone and probably better than most of us need on a daily basis, however, any real camera blows the pics taken by *any* phone clear out of the water.", ">>{deathsnuggle} : I'm not a huge fan of it, it's obviously fake bokeh. Albeit well done, it's still fake and looks like ass. But hey, to each their own.", ">>{examinati0n} : I like this idea. To me, it's clear people love their iPhone and all but these threads are annoying. I feel it could be better served with having a sticky perhaps that can serve as a home for these posts where people can share their photos while the sub main page is here for issues and discussion about aspects of iPhone that aren't a photo. I'm aware there are subs for iPhone photography but I think it might be nice to keep people here and allow them a place for their passion rather than send them elsewhere and react negatively to them.", '>>{Tito1983} : I use to own a Nexus 6P and in that sub reddit they had a great solution to this: Sundays are the day to post pictures, only Sundays. So all people there wait until that day of the week to post photos taken by themselves. That can be a great idea to implement here. Edit: spelling.', '>>{savageboredom} : You could try going to /r/AppleWatch sometime. "Look what I just bought!" "Finally joined the club!" "Decided to treat myself!" Every goddamn day.', ">>{AutoGeek3000} : I'd actually rather have these rumor posts than pictures from iPhone 7+ cameras.", ">>{AutoGeek3000} : > Maybe a mega thread would help? Good idea, although these circlejerk trends come and go within a few days so we'll just need a different mega thread in a few days for whatever the next one is.", '>>{shapeshiftingrobot} : So true. At least they finally implemented tags after 2 years so I can filter out show off posts.', ">>{WalterJrsBreakfast} : Just downvote and move on. If this is truly a problem, enough people will downvote and you won't see them in the future.", '>>{-notausername_} : I feel like Satan would probably design a better phone ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯', ">>{ConstanceVigilant} : Does no-one read [the rules that are posted on the sidebar](https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/wiki/rules)? Photo posts are *already* banned. The problem is that you [must message the mods directly](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fiphone) to get them removed, they don't check reports. > 1. Image posts with iPhone photography will be removed. Try /r/iPhonePictures, /r/iphoneography, or /r/itookapicture.", '>>{flickerkuu} : Oh god please. Especially since most of the photos and photogs are NOT great. I love one of the first ones posted that was literally the back of a dogs ear. The camera is not that amazing. You are simply just discovering the concept of lack of depth of field which the camera can be buggy about.', '>>{flickerkuu} : That actually doesnt accomplish anything by definition they are getting up front so downvoting isnt doing a thing.', '>>{Lets_Go_Flyers} : But... but... without those posts this subreddit will be 100% "My phone is screwed up and I can\'t be bothered to actually use tech support or Google. Somebody diagnose it for me!!!!!"', ">>{mxk31} : And I feel like a dick if I comment that so I just don't comment at all. Glad I'm not the only one that feels this way.", '>>{reanim8ed} : You can do a sticky weekly photos thread and just ban all other photo posts.', ">>{AnonymousSixSixSix} : I agree, plus the camera isn't even that good compared to *other* phones. *Expects downvotes because this sub is Hail Corporate*", ">>{-notausername_} : LOL it's there when I edit, I dunno why it isn't showing up", ">>{marksolomon32} : Is there a sub for complaining about subs? Because seriously, every sub is bombarded and clogged up with these low effort posts that just push down legitimate posts and complain about any posts that isn't new. If you want new posts that are different. Post some. Hey look there is that downvote button obviously the community has spoken if they are getting voted to the top.", ">>{wankthisway} : It ok sir we'll patch you up (Try putting three of them) ¯\\\\\\_(ツ)_/¯", '>>{Torger083} : Dude. Get hooked on phonics or something. Your syntax is atrocious.', ">>{kermityfrog} : So tempted to post a photo using a real camera. And having all these people wondering why their phones can't match it.", ">>{Nutcup} : Yeah, let's crack down on these like we did any beta talk. Look at how dead the thread is without any beta threads. I looked forward to those and now there isn't really much content to engage with. To each their own, I guess.", '>>{marksolomon32} : yeah when im on reddit. i really dont care about grammer or punctuation as long as i get the point across. (yes i am purposefully not capitalizing right now and ending sentences where a period should be. Also, your welcome. their going to love this. and whats the whether like for you?', ">>{Torger083} : I hope you get food poisoning. You're a terrible person.", '>>{marksolomon32} : Of all the things you could wish upon me, that is both cruel and reasonable. (I am sorry. I tried to start that sentence without a proposition, but I could never make it work.) edit: In all seriousness, you are right though. I should start to structure my sentences better and work on proper punctuation.', ">>{Blubbll} : > Every goddamn day That's what he said when being asked for 'how often do you need to charge your apple watch'", ">>{Blubbll} : Rules are for people who don't want to get banned. Also: obligatory r/itookapoop", ">>{retrovertigo} : I agree with you. I have an iPhone 7 and I think the camera is very nice. But I have noticed an increase in photo posts talking about how amazing the camera is. Like you pointed out, rule one of this subreddit states: > 1. Image posts with iPhone photography will be removed. Try /r/iPhonePictures, /r/iphoneography, or /r/itookapicture. Mods, it's time to clean house.", '>>{crapyBird} : We should wait till iPhone 8, but then it\'s going to be "iPhone 8/Plus camera is amazing" :D', ">>{WispGB} : yes becuase we wouldn't want to miss all the 'apple has gone down hill since steve died' and 'apple is lacking innovation' posts....", ">>{WalterJrsBreakfast} : By definition, the system is working as it's supposed to. The majority of visitors to this sub believes that they're quality posts and therefore upvote them. Just because some posts don't interest some of us doesn't mean that they should be banned. I hated the content that was being shown on /r/applewatch, downvoting didn't help, so I unsubscribed.", ">>{sneakpeekbot} : **Here's a sneak peek of /r/AppleWatch using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/applewatch/top/?sort=top&t=all) of the year!** \\#1: [It's official, I will never not have an apple watch now.](https://np.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/5jqigu/its_official_i_will_never_not_have_an_apple_watch/) \\#2: [I spent last week developing a Spotify app that lets you sync playlists with your Apple Watch](https://np.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/5lsn9r/i_spent_last_week_developing_a_spotify_app_that/) \\#3: [Urge Spotify to Create an Apple Watch App. Vote!](https://community.spotify.com/t5/Live-Ideas/Spotify-on-Apple-Watch/idi-p/914915) | [110 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/5kg2rc/urge_spotify_to_create_an_apple_watch_app_vote/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/5lveo6/blacklist/)", ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : Eh... The only other camera that really looked better in some shots was the Pixel. I like the realistic look to photos rather than the yellowish look of photos you get from samsung phones. That's just my opinion though. I came over to iPhone from the LG G3, and while the main camera was great the selfie camera was so washed out I couldn't stand it.", '>>{jugalator} : I\'m starting to think it\'s Apple shills because it\'s one of the main features of the iPhone 7, more easy to demonstrate on reddit than "god I love how it was waterproof this day when this happened"... And you\'re right, many are average at best and I\'m left confused. It\'s still usually rather obvious they\'re from a smartphone.', ">>{utnow} : > Glad I'm not the only one that feels this way. Literally the reason for circle jerks. <3", ">>{Player1Mario} : So you've never used a 7 + camera then. Got it.", '>>{BLACK-AND-DICKER} : Yeah i think we just need more/new mods. Who actually enforce the rules. (I volunteer as tribute, if need be.)', ">>{puterTDI} : Honestly, I think it's likely to have a lot more to do with the person taking the picture than the camera used. Something that stuck with my was a photography class I took that brought in a pro photographer. She had gotten tired of the infatuation in the industry with technology and how it seemed like the attitude was that the camera made the photographer. To counter that she went out and did this really amazing project where all of the photos were taking with a cheap $30 point and shoot film camera, just to make the point that lighting, composition, etc. were all far more important than how much you spent on the camera.", '>>{pw5a29} : Guess we need to suggest Apple to nerf the next iPhone :p', ">>{ConstanceVigilant} : They've always responded right away when I've messaged them and removed the offending posts. They just don't seem to know they need to check the modqueue manually. Possibly they think reporting a post will highlight the mod icon next to the orangered. But if they need mods I volunteer too!", ">>{FrederikTwn} : Am I the only one who feels the same way about the android > IPhone converts. I don't actually care, and the fact that you feel we'll all care about your opinion/ decisions, is honestly very self absorbed.", ">>{RubyRubyRoo} : It might be since this is /r/iphone the mods are using reddit iPhone apps and as we all know there aren't any good reddit apps to mod with.", '>>{twizzle101} : Maybe we should have a weekly thread! Post your iPhone photography to it or something.', '>>{SoCalDawg} : I figured it was a response to recent issues with the camera.', ">>{shitiforgotmypasswor} : This. If the operator knows what he's doing, he can do better than 99% of the iPhoners with mostly any camera.", ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : I can't tell the difference between my 6S plus and all these 7 plus photos. I've owned the 7 plus in the beginning, returned it. Not different enough to justify the $869 I spent on it. Holding off for this years, hopefully it's worth the wait.", ">>{Mattallica} : There's alien blue and I know at least one of the mods uses it to moderate the subreddit.", ">>{Mattallica} : Yeah, it's listed in the rules in the sidebar: >Image posts with iPhone photography will be removed. Try /r/iPhonePictures, /r/iphoneography, or /r/itookapicture.", ">>{sneakpeekbot} : **Here's a sneak peek of /r/iphonepictures using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/top/?sort=top&t=all) of the year!** \\#1: [Everything Need Know iPhone 7 Price,Release Date,Features](http://www.telecominfo.org/everything-need-know-iphone-7-pricerelease-datefeatures/) | [0 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/4wm9dm/everything_need_know_iphone_7_pricerelease/) \\#2: [I was told y'all might like these bee pics, shot with my 7+](http://imgur.com/a/buQF9) | [6 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/5bmyh9/i_was_told_yall_might_like_these_bee_pics_shot/) \\#3: [Rejected 'Shot on iPhone' Commercial](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGlDsQRUQXA) | [0 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/iphonepictures/comments/55bj7b/rejected_shot_on_iphone_commercial/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/5lveo6/blacklist/)", '>>{Addsurge} : Probably just have to wait for the iPhone 8 camera to come out!', ">>{CALL_ME_ISHMAEBY} : Everybody knows Apple people don't understand computers. ^/s", '>>{unreqistered} : >All these posts literally break rule 1 and nothing is done about it. If only I could use my iPhone 7 to take a picture of these crocodile tears.', '>>{littletomcallahan} : My 7 plus pics are not much better than my 6.', '>>{littletomcallahan} : Glad to hear you say this. Does everyone have really low standards, or are they paid trolls because the camera performance is nowhere near as advertised or bragged about on here.', '>>{littletomcallahan} : Check out this Apple support thread of all the disappointed customers: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7691303?start=570&tstart=0', '>>{littletomcallahan} : Can we talk about [this topic](ie me) for a minute?', '>>{BlueMacaw} : It might help if the actual rules were posted in the sidebar, and not just a link to the rules.', ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : 6S Plus is what I'm comparing it to. The 6 had a 8mp camera without OIS. The 6S Plus had a 12mp with OIS just like the 7 plus.", ">>{Casey--} : An uninteresting subject and mediocre composition, but it has shallow DOF so it's soooo pretty!!!", '>>{littletomcallahan} : I know. I was saying that the improvement is so unnoticeable that even a regular 6 produces not much worse photos.', '>>{Dinkdinkdata} : Oh sorry. I thought you said you could see a difference between the two. Ya honestly even the 5S takes a great photo.', '>>{rudedood} : I use the desktop version of Reddit in Safari.', ">>{Dinkdinkdata} : I don't. Like I said the 5S had a great camera at 8.", ">>{Takeabyte} : Why? It's not like there's much news or content on here anyway.", ">>{Metriacanthosaurus} : Who cares? What are the legitimate posts you're missing out on? People posting status updates of how their matte black finish is holding up? Or even better complaints about Siri from people with obvious speech issues? iPhone photography ought to be welcome.", '>>{kankaswag} : they wont post to other subreddits where they wont get any attention, this sub gives those posts up votes', '>>{TsukasaAcelyon} : This is the reason I unsubscribed from there. I tried a post like this to get the mods to make a mega thread or something where people can post pics of their stock watch and feel good about themselves but it got downvoted to hell.', '>>{TsukasaAcelyon} : Need to have three \\ Like this ¯\\ \\ \\_(ツ)_/¯ But without the space in-between', ">>{kewlfocus} : Yes and a skilled photographer can do amazing things with an iPhone as well. I'm a professional Photojournalist and photo editor and I love the 7 plus camera.", '>>{kewlfocus} : I think meta posts like this are more annoying, just downvote and move on.', '>>{dirtmaster} : There was a post yesterday with someone saying "wow look at this night time shot of the empire state building its fucking amazing" I was thinking to my self, if this guy saw what current DSLRs are capable of he would shit bricks. I didnt want to say anything as hes having fun but yea its annoying.', ">>{Gizmotoy} : The portrait mode ones really are the worst. A good portion of the time they're not uploaded at full quality, and even then you can see where the two images were stitched together. It's an OK effect, but most of the ones I've seen probably would have been better with full DOF and no stitching seams. That's my opinion, anyway. On the plus side, the low light performance seems genuinely improved. Not enough to warrant an upgrade from my 6S Plus, but a nice bump in quality regardless.", '>>{paulmgm} : Pretty much the same over at /r/vaporents.', ">>{rr90013} : I feel like the camera isn't even all that good. My 7+ telephoto pics always look like they have some photoshop watercolor filter on them when I zoom In.", '>>{shitiforgotmypasswor} : Obviously you are the exception on the thread then...', ">>{FoxMcWeezer} : There's a sub dedicated to low-effort posts. /r/shitpost", ">>{FreakTalent} : but you see the reason i decided to switch is... yeah i don't really give a shit. It's a phone, Apple isn't paying me to welcome every new customer. At least these convert posts are not THAT common, it would get annoying very fast.", ">>{Captain_Jirk} : No, the mods don't really do shit on reddit.", '>>{downnheavy} : Equivalent to a random co-worker showing "my two angels" baby and cat photos, I sincerely don\'t give a shit if it\'s not mine .', '>>{v8xd} : Complainers gonna complain. Seriously just skip them, no-one is forcing you to read them.', ">>{gaymerRaver} : Oh man, I've had my watch for around a month did a obligatory arm watch pic straight away on there. Now I just feel like a dick lol. Still glad to join the subreddit.", ">>{santaisafraud} : To be fair it's most likely users who have only experienced depth of field for the first time. I still remember how giddy I was when I got my first 50mm prime. Thinking every photo I took looks professional. Looking back now they were all mostly shit. I'm not hating, I enjoy that a new wave of customers are enjoying things like this but I do appreciate that it's mediocre photos for the most part.", ">>{insertnamehere987} : I've made a post just like this about 2 months ago, well received, mods didn't do shit. There's literally a sub for iPhone pictures.", '>>{mayaisme} : And the leather case posts please! It\'s literally people posting dirty cases saying "look how nice dirty leather looks ngrrrrr!"', '>>{thebuggalo} : Definitely need our weekly "Day 1 vs Day 30 Saddle Brown Leather Case" post. Seems like there is always someone thinking he is doing the world a service by posting this.', ">>{thebuggalo} : I work right by the ESB, that picture was garbage. I've taken better looking photos with my 6S or even my 6 two years ago. If anything this sub as proved to me that the only reason I would think to upgrade to iPhone 7 (the camera) is not worth it.", ">>{bbllaakkee} : or the fucking leather case wearing, Jesus Christ. its leather. it's going to wear...", '>>{dirtmaster} : I love the phone but if i want good photos ill break out my nikon.'], [">>{rhino910} : Clinton to Trump: You don't represent the real America. I do.", '>>{Restever99} : You both represent the real America! Disgusting, corrupt, above the law, greedy, and full of yourselves!', ">>{Silver_Skeeter} : Meanwhile, most of America disagrees with Yahoo and recognize that these two don't even come close to representing 'the real America'. The privilege that these two grew up with doesn't just grow on trees.", ">>{rrl_csci} : No, you both Represent the top 1%. A large portion of the other 99% doesn't even make as much in years of full pay to even come close to one of Clinton's Wallstreet speeches. http://hillarytranscriptclock.com/", ">>{Zalaiya} : Well, there's going 4 for 500 on bankruptcy, and then there's leeching $45 million of Haiti relief funds to reward hotel contractors instead of building thousands of homes for disaster victims. So pick and choose.", '>>{rhino910} : The unions that endorsed Hillary Clinton are part of the 1%?', ">>{rrl_csci} : Where did you see anything about Unions in my comment specifically? Clinton and Trump are both part of the top 1%, what's arguable about that? She makes more than many make in 10 years worth of work for an hour long speech.", ">>{SATexas1} : I don't like how the democrats spin immigration laws into a hate for a minority. That bothers me, it's dishonest. I don't like Trump trying to act like he's blue collar - it's ridiculous. These are just really bad candidates", ">>{TyrannosuarezRex} : You do understand that businesses can fail and not file for bankruptcy right? Your number intentionally tries to deceive as if he has 496 successful businesses but it's pretty easy to show that's not the case.", '>>{Rubyjane123} : Real America voted overwhelmingly for Bernie Sanders and was silenced.', ">>{emr1028} : Hillary didn't grow up privileged lol. Trump got $250 million from Daddy, Hillary grew up with a mother who was abandoned as a child.", '>>{emr1028} : Hillary earned her wealth. Why is it bad to be successful?', ">>{rrl_csci} : It's not bad to be successful. Is it wholly acceptable to have 16 million children living in poverty and 45% in low-income families struggling to get by while their parents work their asses off at 2-3 jobs and an individual for a 1 hour speech to banks makes more than the poorer families make in 10 years?", '>>{AlmostFamousGuy} : Hillary is not the America I know. What a narcissistic thing for her to say.', '>>{rhino910} : > Where did you see anything about Unions in my comment specifically? They are not in your comments because that FACT shows you are wrong in your claims. That would be why you left out the fact that working class people are behind Hillary', ">>{rhino910} : Wasn't that a Republican argument? That anyone who doesn't support my candidate isn't a real American", '>>{TyrannosuarezRex} : They have shown its the case. Over and over and over. Google "trump failed businesses" and you\'ll see for yourself. You\'re not very good at correcting records.', '>>{bernieaccountess} : yes, a sleasy, racist, businesses man and a corrupt, greedy, politician..... souunds like the america everyone told me about when i was young..', '>>{emr1028} : Her making money does not make other people poor, so yes.', ">>{letdogsvote} : So, her mom had struggles but she didn't. Got it.", ">>{rrl_csci} : Many are behind Trump too. Does that change the fact that they're not part of the top 1%?", ">>{UrukHaiGuyz} : > Hillary didn't grow up privileged lol. She absolutely did. Nothing like Trump money, but her father was a very successful textile business owner. They grew up in Park Ridge for crying out loud.", ">>{letdogsvote} : They both represent the extremely rich, and just go about it in different ways. Trump being all about himself, Hillary being all about generous friends with deep pockets that need favors. Neither represent average Americans and it's insulting to suggest they do.", ">>{emr1028} : Hillary didn't grow up poor but she didn't grow up rich either.", ">>{rrl_csci} : The rich getting richer while so many have stagnated wages or are living in poverty is why Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders did so well against Clinton and why she's having such a hard time gaining many people's support.", ">>{emr1028} : But I don't get why I'm supposed to be mad that she and her husband found success just because other people didn't. They worked their asses off for it.", '>>{loki0008} : Builders, businessmen and workers will choose a builder, a businessman and a worker, and liars, parasites, communists and cop killers will prefer Hillary.', ">>{letdogsvote} : Howabout we agree she grew up upper middle class with all the attendant benefits? Much more honest than trying to paint her as self made scrapper comin' up hard on the streets.", ">>{emr1028} : I'm not painting her that way, she definitely didn't grow up in poverty like Bill did. It seems as if she grew up financially comfortable but without any luxury.", '>>{penguished} : No she represents all the sleaziest fuckers of corporate America. Trump just represents one.', '>>{UrukHaiGuyz} : Nope, no speechwriter worth anything would let a nomination acceptance speech contain any language remotely like "I wasn\'t privileged". She did talk about her mom being poor as a kid though and her dad doing well in the [speech](http://www.npr.org/2016/07/28/487817725/fact-check-hillary-clintons-speech-to-the-democratic-convention-annotated): >When the war was over, he started his own small business, printing fabric for draperies. I remember watching him stand for hours over silk screens. >He wanted to give my brothers and me opportunities he never had. And he did. >My mother, Dorothy, was abandoned by her parents as a young girl. She ended up on her own at 14, working as a housemaid. She was saved by the kindness of others. >Her first-grade teacher saw she had nothing to eat at lunch and brought extra food to share the entire year. The lesson she passed on to me, years later, stuck with me: No one gets through life alone. We have to look out for each other and lift each other up.', ">>{rrl_csci} : I'd be concerned that so much of the wealth is concentrated in the top 1%. Almost 50% of global wealth is owned by the top 1%. While ~70% of the globe makes under $10,000 a year. That is the problem, that is what should make you upset. Why do you have an issue with wealth being more evenly distributed and why are you ok with so much wealth being held in the hands of the few?", ">>{emr1028} : You're completely strawmanning what I am saying. I have an issue with the current concentration of wealth at the top. That much is obviously bad for society. I do not have an issue with someone earning wealth. I do not that that being successful is a bad thing.", ">>{bernieaccountess} : oh good, cause if it came outta her mouth i wouldn't tust it as far as i could [throw them](http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/democratic-convention-seats-caught-fill-look/) but i find it hard to see how she could take those humble beginings, and just checked them at the door", ">>{rrl_csci} : I'm not saying that being successful is wrong, but that success should not bring you so much income that hundreds or thousands of others, just as hard working, are barely scraping by. I also don't think it's an accurate assessment to call Clinton representative of America when she and Trump are both part of and representative of the top 1% in the country/world.", ">>{Bobzebra} : True. But she did all that while you were paying her. And while she was working for you she lied about her job performance and she hid her work product from you. She also took money, while working for you, and used it to pay her political minions (through the CF), taking money from some of the most repressive regimes on the planet: who think killing homosexuals is a great idea and that women should be beaten for driving a car and that its ok to have slaves. she then runs a rigged campaign purporting to support gays women and minorities. She lies incessantly, ask the fbi. She won't hold a press conference or disclose what she told the likes of Goldman Saks, evidently that was worth almost a quarter million dollars for twenty minutes of her time. ? And she represents who?", '>>{emr1028} : Her being successful has nothing to do with other people being poor. Hundreds of millions of people around the globe are better off because of the work that she and her husband had done over the last forty years.', ">>{Trumpmeister} : Don't forget about Hillary getting her brother the first gold mining permits in Haiti in 50 years.", '>>{emr1028} : There is a difference between growing up not needing to worry about putting food on the table and growing up hanging out on yachts and private jets.', ">>{rhino910} : She represents unions, women, children and workers, but hey don't let those facts interfere", '>>{rhino910} : I don\'t think you understand the meaning of "narcissistic" That is all about self love and being self absorbed. A good example would be when Trump says "only I can fix America"', '>>{lennybrucebruce} : That\'s the "now-cast" which would potentially be the outcome if the election was held today, right now. Check out the "polls-plus" forecast which aggregates all the polls and forecasts and Hillary is 61.7% to Trump\'s 38.3%', ">>{AlmostFamousGuy} : That's laughable. All these narcissistic traits apply to Hillary: * They believe rules and laws do not apply to them. * They always seek out leadership roles * When confronted with issues the narcissist will go into complete denial, often attacking the other party with accusations in a poor attempt at defending themselves * They are strongly averse to criticism. * They always manage to make the conversation about themselves * They often show arrogant, haughty [rude and abusive] behaviors or attitudes. * Have a sense of entitlement. * Lacks empathy: is unable to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others. (Benghazi) * They make excuses and blame others"]]

classify and reply

[">>{Arc1ZD} : Clinton Wins Third Debate, Gains Ground as 'Presidential'", '>>{DragnFyre} : Everything Hillary does and represents is an insult. Not just to Bernie supporters, but everybody.', ">>{butbutPOLITIFACT} : Snopes has become really bad lately. They used to be ok. But they can't help themselves from putting their thumb on the scale for Hillary. Too bad.", '>>{Gal-On} : There are likely fewer black delegates to the Republican convention than at any point in at least a century', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : Now I haven't read what she said, and have made zero effort to find out, but certain headlines say otherwise, so I'll disagree with the fact-checker.", '>>{GuruOfGravitas} : Would anyone be surprised if this particular Republican convention calls for reinstatement of "separate and unequal," public policies?', '>>{Mapey} : Why is Facebook using half a gigabyte of memory?', '>>{slackwaresupport} : the app, the fbi/cia app inside, advertising bullshit, etc. etc.', '>>{TrumpyOnSuicideWatch} : Especially if the headline is from breitbart or wnd or infowars. What more evidence could we need?', ">>{poopy_mcgee} : Some nutjob's personal wordpress site is not a credible media source.", '>>{mattchoo86} : It seems to build up the more you use it. A few applications do that. Dropbox, Snapchat, and Instagram come to mind. If you want to clear it up, just uninstall, and reinstall it.', ">>{0ne_Word} : There are a lot of white ones who just didn't show up. But go ahead, invent racism where there is none.", ">>{Da-Aaron} : Or, it just has a history of sucking. Since the initial release, it's been a power hog, the development team can't figure out how to clear it's cache, it STILL doesn't support slide over on the iPad...", '>>{TrumpyOnSuicideWatch} : Snopes used to be ok until I started disagreeing with reality. Now I prefer infowars!', '>>{Egg-MacGuffin} : I mean, it has INFO in the NAME OF THE SITE.', ">>{kimmisseswhitedick} : Haven't you learned from Paul Ryans selfie? White people congregating without a minority present to guard against wrong thoughts is racist....kinda like the religious police of the middle east.", ">>{beermile} : It's nice to have a couple honest and unbiased news sources out there so I know what information to trust automatically", ">>{sakumar} : Clinton: 60% Trump: 31% That's quite a margin! At least some Trump supporters thought Clinton won the third debate.", '>>{SmugAsHell} : So many you can count them on two hands. Maybe they accidently went to the "white elevators" and got lost?', '>>{SirMontego} : This is the only summary I could find that tracked various commentators from news sources. The tally was Clinton 14, Trump 1. http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2016/Pres/Maps/Oct21.html#item-2', ">>{Da-Aaron} : I've seen my Twitter get up to 700 MB. Is it too much to ask for an option in the settings to clear the damn cache?", ">>{KikiFlowers} : So saying that people fresh from college have had to move into their parents basements, due to a crap job market, is an insult? Because it's true. Get over being bitter.", ">>{Chronic_Apathy1} : SNOPES DISAGREES WITH ME SO IT'S BECOME REALLY BAD Do you people fucking hear yourselves?", ">>{Mapey} : And it's the only app that lags to open on my 5c", '>>{gaeuvyen} : Yeah, info *wars*, theyre at war with information.', ">>{RandomCanucklehead} : Or, you know, wholly unrepresentative of modern america, where there are just as many non-whites as whites; yet the GOP cannot for the life of them seem to find any –\xa0unless they're making cops look bad, of course.", ">>{formeraide} : But Gallup isn't. Face the facts - outside of your echo chamber, America doesn't think Trump is worthy. Which he isn't.", '>>{DragnFyre} : Oh? Tell me then, what is so amazing about this evil demon. Bonus points if you can do it without a Trump comparison. Is she better, probably. Having to choose between dog shit and horse shit, however, is still a shitty choice.', ">>{Nanoo_1972} : Because it's an absolute piece of shit programming. On my 6+, it's constantly lagging when I scroll. Clicking any external link and trying to view a web page in their built-in web browser is a crap shoot: 1/2 the time, the page never loads, and the other half of the time, it crashes while trying to render the page.", ">>{roboboogienights} : for fuck's sake... this convention is more disorganized than a frat party.", ">>{codemonkey85} : In my opinion, the onus should be on Apple to provide users a way to clear an app's cache on an app-by-app basis. But yeah, the Facebook app has been terrible in general.", ">>{ColossalMistake} : Sure she did. Maybe not as bad as some conservaice media is trying to claim, but the comments were pretty demeaning to Sanders supporters. First of all, there's millions of us who aren't even millenials. Second, to lump the largest age-related voting block into a handful of big groups and label them all disgruntled is fairly demeaning too. It's like she cannot admit, or won't, that she has serious shortcomings as a candidate and possibly there are..a handful of other reasons Sanders supporters aren't excited to jump on board with the oligarchy.", '>>{Chel_of_the_sea} : No, she just went on about how over-idealistic we were, then turned around and promised us what she said six months ago was impossible, now that she knows she needs our votes.', '>>{hearthneewb} : Putting Trump anywhere close to being equal to Hillary at this point is Bias towards Trump. You can be so unbiased that you become biased and making Trump look good is one of those cases', '>>{paraconformity} : Only her second best. Happily, the margin of her victories correlates with the viewership ratings of each debate.', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : Hey, Hillary is not shit, she's month old expired milk at the *worst*.", '>>{kimmisseswhitedick} : Lol what? No it isn\'t the country is 70% white. Just because blacks make up 14% of the population, it doesn\'t mean they make up 14% of political science/law/economic majors that have the academic chops to be an intern in D.C. , nor does it mean 14% of applicants to the G.O.P. party are black. "X of population" is a partisan hacks argument meant to convince fools to their point of view. It is representative of nothing.', '>>{MannequinFlyswatter} : We get it. Lets move on to the issues', ">>{PetPsychicDetective} : So your sources are 1) An opinion piece with no statistics and laughably incorrect predictions: >Given Trump’s performance, I expect to see some stories about panic in the Clinton universe by the time the Sunday shows roll around. Before tonight’s debate, the conventional wisdom was that Trump was collapsing — and when conventional wisdom is set this far ahead of election day, the conventional wisdom is often wrong. 2) A flash poll that notes it is unscientific, which means it's open to brigading 3) A summary which notes that Hillary won according to actually valid CNN post-debate debate polls What are you proving here?", '>>{letdogsvote} : That GOP minority outreach since the lessons of 2012 has really gone great!', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : I know, they're full explanations of how they came to their conclusions are just to inconvenient for my opinions.", '>>{Z0idberg_MD} : But... they said last night that Trump is the one to unite a divided nation!', '>>{Da-Aaron} : I would say the responsibility rests with the developers of the apps in question.', ">>{ozabelle} : they'll to bunch up the few they got and golf cart them in front of as many cameras as they can. or call a temp agency and have some extras suited up and sent over.", '>>{ivsciguy} : They looked at the autopsy report and apparently decided to go full zombie instead of trying CPR.', '>>{hoffmad08} : Yeah, totally not insulting at all. Now vote for Hillary or else you stupid millenn--I mean cherished lifeblood of our nation?', '>>{SirMontego} : I wonder what the numbers would look like if bias viewers were removed from the polling. For example 26% of those polled for the first debate said Trump had a "good understanding of the issues." Recall, that in response to a cyber security question, Trump said "I have a son—he’s 10 years old. He has computers. He is so good with these computers. It’s unbelievable." If that\'s not evidence he has ZERO understanding of cyber security, I\'m not sure what is.', '>>{codemonkey85} : I might also be a little biased on this, because I was on Android for a while, and that was an OS-level feature there. Either way, it needs to be a user option, especially for cache-hungry apps such as Facebook.', '>>{rdjnk} : The washington and fortune articles are opinion pieces, not polls. As for AOL, this is what they say > according to the unscientific survey that ran on AOL.com during the debate.', ">>{Kronos_Selai} : The best thing to read was that the vast majority was ready to accept the outcome of the election. 1/5 say they won't, but that's better than a 50-50 split of the country. I'm guessing a few states will say they want to split from the union like they do after every election, or begin calling for her impeachment. Probably some violence in the south, but I'm sure the CIA and FBI got that stuff under control considering how easily those pieces of shit were caught planning to bomb the refugee mosque and apartment complex.", ">>{TrentonJ} : Winning a debate is an opinion, not a fact. Trump supporters said Trump won too, doesn't mean it's true.", ">>{coolshifts} : 's Ok. They're only 13.2% of the population and most don't vote anyway. Or can't vote due to criminal records. Or at least that's the way most republicans think.", '>>{Zlibservacratican} : Most of us, though, are not new to politics. Majority of Sanders supporters supported Obama for his first term. Most of us are not children. Most of us live in our own apartments. Most of us understand that politics is compromising. She understands that a lot of us did get our education, and that the job market isn\'t providing for us. But then she\'s turns around and calls it a mindset and not the economic reality we live in. She says they should "try their best to not be a wet blanket on idealism" but then wants to replace or goals with smaller goals and present them as bigger goals therefore being a wet blanket on idealism. I think a lot of you trying to excuse these lines aren\'t really understanding the kind of condescension she puts off here. If she truly understood the wall we face coming out of college, she wouldn\'t be speaking about people living on their parents basements. She\'d be talking about college graduates having to work years as interns with little pay before having a secure job. How "entry level" positions need 5 years experience beyond our degree. How a majority of positions are being consolidated after boomers retire or how older generations are holding onto their jobs longer and longer. I myself have a bachelor\'s of science, work in a lab, but only make $9 an hour. This is the reality we live in, not a "mindset."', ">>{C6O1999} : Winning a debate means the majority of people decided you won. The majority of opinion is what matters. But that's not what I was referring to anyway.", ">>{Tynictansol} : Google Photos has done that multiple times for me. I'll take a whole bunch of pictures and back them up, and I've had over a gig of space consumed by the application whereupon I need to uninstall and reinstall the application, just like you recommend.", ">>{Yarraq} : It is cache. It's OK to uninstall and re-install every two weeks. Or better, use m.facebook.com.", '>>{entaro_tassadar} : They’re children of the Great Recession. And they are living in their parents’ basement. So she didn\'t call them "basement dwellers", but she said that they all live in their parents\' basements.', '>>{pw5a29} : they are cache, when your device runs out of space, the system would clean the apps', ">>{TrancePhreak} : Then we'd end up with apps that don't have that feature, apps that have it in the settings, apps that have it in the app, etc. It's better for this to be system level. Also, it would be nice if there was a clear all data option as having to delete and re-download a misbehaving app is annoying. Especially so when the apps are >1GB.", ">>{chunky_donuts} : So don't vote for her. Vote for someone else. Or stay home. Get over yourselves. Never seen such a sensitive self absorbed demographic in my life.", ">>{DeadObjects} : It's the cache. You don't have to uninstall and reinstall. There's a button to clear the cache within the app. Just go to the more tab>settings>account settings>browser>clear data", '>>{boogietime} : A different group is already on top of it. http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/260850/safe-space-segregation-college-coffee-shop-only-daniel-greenfield', '>>{thenikj} : Delete the Facebook App Open Facebook.com on Safari Click on Add to Homescreen', ">>{colormefeminist} : If Hillary isn't impeached first, she's probably in the very least going to be primaried against in 2020. She is, after all, extremely negligent with national security.", ">>{IvanKozlov} : Holy fucking shit nobody gave you the real damn answer **ACTUAL ANSWER AND NOT MINDLESS FACEBOOK BITCHING HERE OP** It's because Facebook cache's pictures that you look at for easier loading the next time you look at that picture. That's why it takes up so much space. The pictures you look at are stored locally in the app for faster loading of the next viewing.", '>>{3Suze} : The Washington Examiner (that stalwart example of good journalism /s) posted the story and r/the_donald brigaded it. It was like perverse poetry in motion. Unfortunately it took a life of its own on FB through Bernie groups. Edit: I am a Bernie supporter and have a college degree. I tend bar and I live in a small house with 4 roommates.', '>>{boogietime} : Oh come on, having "red," "white," and "blue" elevators is now racist?', '>>{iakt} : Yeah and another thing: On devices using iOS 5 or later, cache cleaning occurs automatically when the device has less than 1 GB of available storage. This storage-management feature is designed to optimize the performance of your iOS device when space is limited. The cache for infrequently used documents is cleared first. Source: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203644', '>>{chimichangaXL} : With google photos makes sense. It needs to cache for fast loading. It actually takes up to 2 GB. With Facebook however , should not take this big.', '>>{PurpleMonkeyFeet} : It even says storage on his own screenshot. How do people still so frequently get this wrong?!', '>>{MoonManReturns} : Regressives are doing a wonderful job themselves of resegregating society.', '>>{PurpleMonkeyFeet} : >It seems to build up the more you use it. Well, I mean, a cache with nothing in it is rather useless, eh? You can argue that maybe it should be more aggressive about purging itself, but it still has to use a decent amount of space to be of any use at all', ">>{spoiled_generation} : Fine, try to impeach her. I don't give a shit. And, if they can find someone that can beat her in a primary, I'm all for it. But honestly, we know neither of those things will happen.", ">>{miashaee} : That's not nearly true, it might be true in about......30-40 years but today the country is close to 70% white and 30% not white.", '>>{afidak} : The fact checkers that are a husband and wife team that have a leftist bias?', '>>{PurpleMonkeyFeet} : This is something that iOS USED to have but apple in their infinite wisdom decided that was too much control for their users so they took it away', ">>{ladyships} : no, it didn't. we took offense because of what she actually said. the trumpers didn't have to spin it for us. jesus.", ">>{Eagle3163} : Didn't you hear? Everything that is white is racist and bad.", '>>{kimmisseswhitedick} : The top 3 interracial marriages aw/wm, hw/wm, and hm/ww offspring are all counted as POC. The 30% "not white" counts all interracial children as POC whether they identify as such or not.', ">>{miashaee} : There isn't a perfect way to evaluate race, in any event America has changed greatly and is set to change a great deal more with respect to race. It will be interesting to see how that effects politics and society.......especially if the democrats hold on to the lion's share of the minority vote, I mean honestly I don't think Trump losing would be he worst thing for the GOP, the worst thing would be to have Trump out there for 4 years further poisoning your chances with minorities. I mean this tone problem that the GOP has with minorities is a thing and if Trump wins they will not learn the lesson that they need to to finally try and reach out to the brown people.", '>>{GuruOfGravitas} : Regressive has always been a synonym for the conservative side, why do you tar yourself?', '>>{GuruOfGravitas} : Oh that is organized by the opposition, like that fakery Milo Yasshole is up to.', ">>{socoamaretto} : They got that retarded pastor though so that's something.", ">>{sp0ck06} : there are 2,472 GOP delegates at the RNC. Guess how many are black. A whopping 18. Aren't the elected representatives supposed to, y'know, *represent* the people?", ">>{Da-Aaron} : It did? When was that? I definitely don't remember that feature.", '>>{cool_hand_luke} : The convention hall does need any "whites only" signs at the bathrooms or drinking fountains, it pretty much implied at this point by the lack of anyone else that might need the sign to tell them to go elsewhere.', '>>{cromwest} : Alt right has been getting a ton of mileage out of using leftist rhetoric on the internet. I like this line of attack because if people Google search their comments, they will see the phrases used as they were originally.', ">>{Da-Aaron} : It did? When was that? I definitely don't remember that feature.", ">>{PurpleMonkeyFeet} : I'd have to do some searching but I want to say iOS 6 is when they took it away. I could be wrong though. EDIT: Looks like it was 5 when they took it away. http://forums.imore.com/ios-5/232536-clear-data-documents-app.html http://i.imgur.com/DE07PaU.jpg", '>>{JustDoc} : And yet, if we follow your advice, we will be to blame in the event that Trump wins the election. So much for party unity.', '>>{ladyships} : bingo. we have a much lower standard of living than our parents. the boomers pulled the ladder up after them.', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : You\'re embellishing by adding the "all" there. She was painting an image that it\'s hard to say doesn\'t apply to many young Bernie supporters who had to come home to live with parents, and carried that forward as a reason to look for a candidate promising larger changes. She sympathizes with that situation, and Bernie today said he absolutely agreed with the assessment. Lots of people are looking for any reason to hate her. This isn\'t it, and the alt-right heartily thanks those who put much stock in it.', '>>{Trumptron3000} : The concept of young person who lives in a basement is, in the modern day, considered derogatory. Flat out, full stop.', ">>{Byzantine279} : ...That was exactly what she did. You completely misread everything she said. It's almost amazing.", '>>{uhmmaybe} : > myself have a bachelor\'s of science, work in a lab, but only make $9 an hour. This is the reality we live in, not a "mindset." Honestly, just blame the boomers for your own shortcomings? Where is the personal responsibility? Take risks, make good decisions, and earn more if that is what you are looking for.', '>>{unverified_user} : You\'re offended that she used the word "mindset"? Are you *trying* to be offended?', '>>{Byzantine279} : Which is why the entire statement was prefaced with "some". And Sanders has described his own supporters in exactly the same way. Hell, many of them describe themselves in the same manner.', ">>{Byzantine279} : It certainly wasn't meant to be. You just want to be insulted. Her entire point was they were forced to do so by circumstance despite doing everything correctly. Ie there was nothing wrong with it.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : She literally said that she wanted young people to stay idealistic. There are way, way bigger things at stake in this election than microanalyzing the details of an 8-month old speech.', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : But they don't have any authority over reality. They put in the work and release their findings, but they don't own that process. Some say they have a bias; assuming that it's true, *anyone* can still read Clinton's full statements. Anyone who reads those statements without bias cannot conclude she insulted Bernie supporters, unless they don't understand what words are and how they form sentences.", ">>{Trumptron3000} : You can keep spinning your wheels, but the reality under the thin veneer of this weekend's narrative tells a different story: [it's caused enough damage that the campaign is taking time to figure out how to try and reverse it.](https://twitter.com/thehill/status/782732910126329856)", '>>{Byzantine279} : He specifically said Mexican immigrants are. He did not, however, say illegal in the entire speech where that line was used.', '>>{Zlibservacratican} : I did. That\'s what I\'m doing. This is the condescension in talking about here. My complaint is that the position I have should be offering more. And it\'s funny how you\'ve conveniently ignored all of my points and just went "hurr durr just blame the boomers for your problems." So screw off with that attitude.', ">>{Byzantine279} : Yes, because some people are complete morons. It's irritating how easily led people are. Also, that tweet is a lie.", ">>{xjayroox} : I would *love* Trump to toss out this accusation at the next debate. I gauran-fucking-tee she'll have a response along with another trap set if he does", '>>{xjayroox} : You do realize Bernie said she was correct, right?', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : Yes, yes they are. You have to try *so hard* to be offended by this.', ">>{uhmmaybe} : >My complaint is that the position I have should be offering more. Everyone thinks they deserve more. >So screw off with that attitude. I'm not here to coddle you. Blame whoever you want, get angry at me, say whatever you feel. That's your right, but I'm not impressed.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : Pretty much everyone will be to blame if he wins. Clinton voters for choosing her, Bernie/Gary/Jill voters who refused to out of spite, but most of all the voters Trump conned into voting for him. Best not go that route.', ">>{Zlibservacratican} : Ooh then that completely changed everything. If Bernie says it, then I must follow because I'm a millennial who only follows cults of personality.", '>>{Trumptron3000} : If it were just one instance of Hillary being condescending, this would not have been nearly as big of a story. This is now the *second* story to come out in a short span where, in her own words, she insults voters.', ">>{TooSmalley} : Can't wait for the level headed discussion that will follow this article /s", ">>{chunky_donuts} : Oh look. I'm faced with tough choices in life. It's all so unfair!", '>>{Byzantine279} : Your first mistake was when you said: > But then she\'s turns around and calls it a mindset and not the economic reality we live in. No, what she actually said was that that leads to a mindset where you feel the entire world needs to change, etc. Which is true. Those who are hurt by the system are usually the ones who want to change it the most, after all. AFter that you just continued compounding on that error. >She says they should "try their best to not be a wet blanket on idealism" but then wants to replace or goals with smaller goals and present them as bigger goals therefore being a wet blanket on idealism. No. What she said was **she** didn\'t want to be a wet blanket on idealism and kill the enthusiasm of Sanders supporters. But that she feared that their lofty goals were not politically achievable, since at least in the short term the House will be controlled by Republicans, and they would sooner die than go along with a progressive agenda. So she wants to help your goals, but fears she can\'t, and doesn\'t want to promise the stars knowing that it\'s unlikely she will be able to deliver. Effectively you completely changed your pronouns twice, and so flipped where things were ascribed, completely changing the meaning of the speech', ">>{Bebedvd} : Because they can't get the jobs they're entitled to after doing everything they were supposed to. That's not the same as calling someone a loser for living in their parents basement because they lack talent, ambition, and social skills. It's not a flat out full stop situation. Context matters here.", ">>{snorkleboy} : Is your premise 'they are leftist so they cannot be right'?", '>>{Psy1} : Why not blame the system? During the long boom anyone with a University degree was guaranteed a secured job as employers would fight each other for engineers and scientists to the point many companies had their own internal education departments to train up their workers. Then you had DARPA allowing a large number of students to simply becoming professional researches for the US Government in the University. Today job security and opportunity is a shadow of what it was during the long boom yet you are implying this is a personal failing.', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : > *Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.*', ">>{Byzantine279} : Or as I've discovered below, misread a few words and hence completely change the meaning of a few sentences.", '>>{F22Rapture} : I mean, you say that, but 6 months ago it would have been all that /r/politics needed. Anybody trying to defend it with context would be downvoted to the bottom of the page.', ">>{snorkleboy} : No trump did say that some, he assumes, are good people. He recognizes that good Mexicans exist he just hasn't met one yet.", ">>{unverified_user} : I read what you wrote. I never read Hillary talking about how Millennials have a bunch of made-up fantasy problems, because she's never said anything like that.", ">>{Gorgonaut666} : As an ardent Sanders supporter, she obviously did not. I don't think she thinks really highly of us (the feeling is mutual), but she clearly was going for empathy.", ">>{Mr_Montague} : Not only has she insulted them (in private to boot). She also used her clout to get the DNC to make it impossible for him to win the nomination. I know all it'll probably take is a thousand articles to convince Bernie supporters it's okay and everything's fine but it still won't change the reality of what they did to the man and the millions of people who put their heart and soul and money into the guy and his ideas because he WASN'T Hillary Clinton.", '>>{TooSmalley} : What she said. >Some are new to politics completely.They’re children of the Great Recession. And they are living in their parents’ basement. They feel they got their education and the jobs that are available to them are not at all what they envisioned for themselves. And they don’t see much of a future Thats the basement dweller part people are freaking out about.', '>>{NutDraw} : You are free to choose your own path. However, you\'re not absolved of responsibility for its consequences. Look, I\'m sorry people don\'t like the set of decisions they\'re faced with. But you know what? That\'s fucking life. The most frustrating thing about hearing these lines from people claiming to have supported Bernie is that they\'re completely ignoring one of the central tenants of his revolution- change is hard, takes time, focus, and doesn\'t happen with one election. So we lost an election. It\'s not the end if the world. But if Trump wins it literally may be. Is that worth a fucking statement? It\'s not about "falling in line," it\'s about stopping a mad man and con artist from getting the highest office in the land. None of us or our opinions are special snowflakes next to that. People need to get over themselves.', '>>{Thegoldenmean19876} : Bingo. She painted Sanders supporters as pitiable people, uninformed people. She keeps doing this. She honestly believes she and her Wall Street financiers are smarter than everybody else She refuses to admit that she is a pitable and piss poor candidate.', '>>{hallaquelle} : Fake title. The word "insult" does not even appear anywhere on that page. Furthermore, the only thing that this fact check verifies is that Hillary did not use the specific words "basement dwellers" which we knew already. The reality is that I am a Bernie supporter, and I found several parts of this private speech to be insulting. It\'s funny that throughout the entire primary the narrative by the Hillary camp was that Bernie supporters were "mansplaining" and "whitesplaining" which was ridiculous and sad because there were supporters of every candidate doing the same thing, but of course that has never stopped Hillary supporters from condescendingly "Demsplaining" to Bernie supporters that their views are idealistic and that only Hillary\'s pay-to-play incrementalism is pragmatic and effective. And by the way, I get more insulted every time I see Hillary supporters try to spin the crap out of this story. Saying that I wasn\'t insulted is even more insulting. Is there an end to your condescension?', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : Stop trying to shove words in my face, I already said I made my decision! ^^/s In all seriousness, it may be blunt, and use a phrase that's typically pejorative, but anyone who reads the context shouldn't be confused.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : Wherein she never says "basement dweller," and actually came off quite sympathetic. To the point that Bernie said he agreed with her assessment just today, and dismissed any perceived tension as normal for a campaign.', '>>{Lurker_Coteaz} : Have you actually read her comments? She was sympathizing with young Sanders supporters. Seriously, just go read the whole thing.', '>>{Egg-MacGuffin} : I had a low-energy leftist try to convince me the Earth was round once. What a loser. Sad!', '>>{Egg-MacGuffin} : Quick, full stop before I have to read any more to understand her meaning!', ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Why is it derogatory? It's a comment on how the economy is failing the youth of the nation.", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : > She says they should "try their best to not be a wet blanket on idealism" but then wants to replace or goals with smaller goals and present them as bigger goals therefore being a wet blanket on idealism. I don\'t think she has any problem with stuff like Sanders plans, but they would never get through Congress. His plans required large raises on taxes and that is something that the House would not give in on. Clinton\'s plans don\'t go as far but also require small tax hikes. Also she said "these are children of the Great Recession" so I think she is ackowledging that our economy is still suffering from the effects of 2008.', '>>{Zlibservacratican} : >"They **feel** that they got their education and the jobs that are available to them are not at all what they envisioned for themselves. And they don\'t see much of a future. >"That is a mindset that is really affecting their policies." She\'s right, but I\'m not wrong either. It\'s more than just what we feel, more than what we envisioned, more than a mindset, and that\'s subtle condescension, wether or not you are willing to admit it. It\'s systemic problems within the job market, problems that I indicated before. Like you admit, the world needs to change and we just wanted a stronger forceful leader who doesn\'t cry about the opposition\'s existence. We wanted someone who would go to the table with a stronger stance, so that when they do inevitably compromise, there was at least an attempt made to move the goalposts closer to our side, and during the primary, that was Bernie Sanders, who presented his lofty goals as just that, goals, not promises. And we understood that. >"We should try not to be a wet blanket on idealism -- you want people to be idealistic, you want them to set big goals -- but to take what we can achieve now and try to present them as bigger goals." I appreciate her words here. But she\'s betraying herself when she wants to present what she thinks can be achieved as bigger goals than what they are, preemptively compromised goals, smaller than the ones we wish to achieve. And knowing the republicans, they will take advantage of that. They push hard for their ideals, and democrats cave to their demands like they\'ve done for decades. It\'s how regulations have been rolled back, and regulators defunded, and social services cut. It\'s how the public option failed during the fight for the ACA. Look, in the end, there really isn\'t anyone else to vote for. But this attitude is a problem for many millennials like me, it\'s what is causing the enthusiasm gap. So she\'s going to become president, but we have no illusions of achieving great change under her leadership.', ">>{JustDoc} : You know what, you got me. Hillary all the way! Check it out - you know nothing about me, where I have been or what I have done with my life. Want a glimpse, check my post history. Many of Bernie's supporters are veterans - myself included. I have fought and nearly given my life several times in order to support the policies that were laid out by our current and previous administrations, and I did it willingly. I think I've made more difficult decisions than most of the population could ever dream of making. That said, I will vote in this election, just as I have every election; primary and general, state and federal, since I was 18. When faced with the current popular choices, I refuse to vote for the lesser of the two evils and I refuse to vote for someone just to keep a flawed electoral process in tact. This is NOT the fault of the common voter, but the fault of those few that are more powerful that the common voter who can be leveraged and bought. Why do you think overturning Citizens United is such a big deal? I do not believe that either of the popular candidates are fit to hold the office for various reasons and my vote will reflect that. If you wish to continue propagating the illusion of choice, then that is your birthright as an American, but I will not. That too, is my right.", ">>{Trump_1776} : Unacceptable Title is right. Hillary insults everyone everytime she opens her mouth. You people here are really working overtime to twist Hillary Clinton into an honest person who isn't a criminal who is going to jail. WONDERFUL WEDNESDAY WIKILEAKS. Good luck hamstering that into a Hillary victory.", ">>{chunky_donuts} : Honestly I don't care about your story or what you think.", ">>{Trump_1776} : It's amazing how we've watched crooked's crimes and misdemeanors go on right before our eyes for 30+ years and the trail of bodies and cover ups she's left in her wake. It's amazing that she's back again and won't go away. It's amazing that there are people willing to hamster and shill for her here and across the media. AMAZING. WONDERFUL WEDNESDAY WIKILEAKS.", '>>{Skyrick} : > Bernie/Gary/Jill voters who refused to out of spite, This bugs me. If I want to vote for Gary/Jill then why do people insist that that is a vote for Trump/Clinton over a sign that the big two have ignored a demographic and had them vote for their interest elsewhere instead.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Gal-On} : There are likely fewer black delegates to the Republican convention than at any point in at least a century', '>>{GuruOfGravitas} : Would anyone be surprised if this particular Republican convention calls for reinstatement of "separate and unequal," public policies?', ">>{0ne_Word} : There are a lot of white ones who just didn't show up. But go ahead, invent racism where there is none.", ">>{kimmisseswhitedick} : Haven't you learned from Paul Ryans selfie? White people congregating without a minority present to guard against wrong thoughts is racist....kinda like the religious police of the middle east.", '>>{SmugAsHell} : So many you can count them on two hands. Maybe they accidently went to the "white elevators" and got lost?', ">>{RandomCanucklehead} : Or, you know, wholly unrepresentative of modern america, where there are just as many non-whites as whites; yet the GOP cannot for the life of them seem to find any –\xa0unless they're making cops look bad, of course.", ">>{roboboogienights} : for fuck's sake... this convention is more disorganized than a frat party.", '>>{kimmisseswhitedick} : Lol what? No it isn\'t the country is 70% white. Just because blacks make up 14% of the population, it doesn\'t mean they make up 14% of political science/law/economic majors that have the academic chops to be an intern in D.C. , nor does it mean 14% of applicants to the G.O.P. party are black. "X of population" is a partisan hacks argument meant to convince fools to their point of view. It is representative of nothing.', '>>{letdogsvote} : That GOP minority outreach since the lessons of 2012 has really gone great!', '>>{Z0idberg_MD} : But... they said last night that Trump is the one to unite a divided nation!', ">>{ozabelle} : they'll to bunch up the few they got and golf cart them in front of as many cameras as they can. or call a temp agency and have some extras suited up and sent over.", '>>{ivsciguy} : They looked at the autopsy report and apparently decided to go full zombie instead of trying CPR.', ">>{coolshifts} : 's Ok. They're only 13.2% of the population and most don't vote anyway. Or can't vote due to criminal records. Or at least that's the way most republicans think.", '>>{boogietime} : A different group is already on top of it. http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/260850/safe-space-segregation-college-coffee-shop-only-daniel-greenfield', '>>{boogietime} : Oh come on, having "red," "white," and "blue" elevators is now racist?', '>>{MoonManReturns} : Regressives are doing a wonderful job themselves of resegregating society.', ">>{miashaee} : That's not nearly true, it might be true in about......30-40 years but today the country is close to 70% white and 30% not white.", ">>{Eagle3163} : Didn't you hear? Everything that is white is racist and bad.", '>>{kimmisseswhitedick} : The top 3 interracial marriages aw/wm, hw/wm, and hm/ww offspring are all counted as POC. The 30% "not white" counts all interracial children as POC whether they identify as such or not.', ">>{miashaee} : There isn't a perfect way to evaluate race, in any event America has changed greatly and is set to change a great deal more with respect to race. It will be interesting to see how that effects politics and society.......especially if the democrats hold on to the lion's share of the minority vote, I mean honestly I don't think Trump losing would be he worst thing for the GOP, the worst thing would be to have Trump out there for 4 years further poisoning your chances with minorities. I mean this tone problem that the GOP has with minorities is a thing and if Trump wins they will not learn the lesson that they need to to finally try and reach out to the brown people.", '>>{GuruOfGravitas} : Regressive has always been a synonym for the conservative side, why do you tar yourself?', '>>{GuruOfGravitas} : Oh that is organized by the opposition, like that fakery Milo Yasshole is up to.', ">>{socoamaretto} : They got that retarded pastor though so that's something.", ">>{sp0ck06} : there are 2,472 GOP delegates at the RNC. Guess how many are black. A whopping 18. Aren't the elected representatives supposed to, y'know, *represent* the people?", '>>{cool_hand_luke} : The convention hall does need any "whites only" signs at the bathrooms or drinking fountains, it pretty much implied at this point by the lack of anyone else that might need the sign to tell them to go elsewhere.', '>>{cromwest} : Alt right has been getting a ton of mileage out of using leftist rhetoric on the internet. I like this line of attack because if people Google search their comments, they will see the phrases used as they were originally.'], ['>>{Mapey} : Why is Facebook using half a gigabyte of memory?', '>>{slackwaresupport} : the app, the fbi/cia app inside, advertising bullshit, etc. etc.', '>>{mattchoo86} : It seems to build up the more you use it. A few applications do that. Dropbox, Snapchat, and Instagram come to mind. If you want to clear it up, just uninstall, and reinstall it.', ">>{Da-Aaron} : Or, it just has a history of sucking. Since the initial release, it's been a power hog, the development team can't figure out how to clear it's cache, it STILL doesn't support slide over on the iPad...", ">>{Da-Aaron} : I've seen my Twitter get up to 700 MB. Is it too much to ask for an option in the settings to clear the damn cache?", ">>{Mapey} : And it's the only app that lags to open on my 5c", ">>{Nanoo_1972} : Because it's an absolute piece of shit programming. On my 6+, it's constantly lagging when I scroll. Clicking any external link and trying to view a web page in their built-in web browser is a crap shoot: 1/2 the time, the page never loads, and the other half of the time, it crashes while trying to render the page.", ">>{codemonkey85} : In my opinion, the onus should be on Apple to provide users a way to clear an app's cache on an app-by-app basis. But yeah, the Facebook app has been terrible in general.", '>>{Da-Aaron} : I would say the responsibility rests with the developers of the apps in question.', '>>{codemonkey85} : I might also be a little biased on this, because I was on Android for a while, and that was an OS-level feature there. Either way, it needs to be a user option, especially for cache-hungry apps such as Facebook.', ">>{Tynictansol} : Google Photos has done that multiple times for me. I'll take a whole bunch of pictures and back them up, and I've had over a gig of space consumed by the application whereupon I need to uninstall and reinstall the application, just like you recommend.", ">>{Yarraq} : It is cache. It's OK to uninstall and re-install every two weeks. Or better, use m.facebook.com.", '>>{pw5a29} : they are cache, when your device runs out of space, the system would clean the apps', ">>{TrancePhreak} : Then we'd end up with apps that don't have that feature, apps that have it in the settings, apps that have it in the app, etc. It's better for this to be system level. Also, it would be nice if there was a clear all data option as having to delete and re-download a misbehaving app is annoying. Especially so when the apps are >1GB.", ">>{DeadObjects} : It's the cache. You don't have to uninstall and reinstall. There's a button to clear the cache within the app. Just go to the more tab>settings>account settings>browser>clear data", '>>{thenikj} : Delete the Facebook App Open Facebook.com on Safari Click on Add to Homescreen', ">>{IvanKozlov} : Holy fucking shit nobody gave you the real damn answer **ACTUAL ANSWER AND NOT MINDLESS FACEBOOK BITCHING HERE OP** It's because Facebook cache's pictures that you look at for easier loading the next time you look at that picture. That's why it takes up so much space. The pictures you look at are stored locally in the app for faster loading of the next viewing.", '>>{iakt} : Yeah and another thing: On devices using iOS 5 or later, cache cleaning occurs automatically when the device has less than 1 GB of available storage. This storage-management feature is designed to optimize the performance of your iOS device when space is limited. The cache for infrequently used documents is cleared first. Source: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203644', '>>{chimichangaXL} : With google photos makes sense. It needs to cache for fast loading. It actually takes up to 2 GB. With Facebook however , should not take this big.', '>>{PurpleMonkeyFeet} : It even says storage on his own screenshot. How do people still so frequently get this wrong?!', '>>{PurpleMonkeyFeet} : >It seems to build up the more you use it. Well, I mean, a cache with nothing in it is rather useless, eh? You can argue that maybe it should be more aggressive about purging itself, but it still has to use a decent amount of space to be of any use at all', '>>{PurpleMonkeyFeet} : This is something that iOS USED to have but apple in their infinite wisdom decided that was too much control for their users so they took it away', ">>{Da-Aaron} : It did? When was that? I definitely don't remember that feature.", ">>{Da-Aaron} : It did? When was that? I definitely don't remember that feature.", ">>{PurpleMonkeyFeet} : I'd have to do some searching but I want to say iOS 6 is when they took it away. I could be wrong though. EDIT: Looks like it was 5 when they took it away. http://forums.imore.com/ios-5/232536-clear-data-documents-app.html http://i.imgur.com/DE07PaU.jpg"], ['>>{DragnFyre} : Everything Hillary does and represents is an insult. Not just to Bernie supporters, but everybody.', ">>{butbutPOLITIFACT} : Snopes has become really bad lately. They used to be ok. But they can't help themselves from putting their thumb on the scale for Hillary. Too bad.", ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : Now I haven't read what she said, and have made zero effort to find out, but certain headlines say otherwise, so I'll disagree with the fact-checker.", '>>{TrumpyOnSuicideWatch} : Especially if the headline is from breitbart or wnd or infowars. What more evidence could we need?', '>>{TrumpyOnSuicideWatch} : Snopes used to be ok until I started disagreeing with reality. Now I prefer infowars!', '>>{Egg-MacGuffin} : I mean, it has INFO in the NAME OF THE SITE.', ">>{beermile} : It's nice to have a couple honest and unbiased news sources out there so I know what information to trust automatically", ">>{KikiFlowers} : So saying that people fresh from college have had to move into their parents basements, due to a crap job market, is an insult? Because it's true. Get over being bitter.", ">>{Chronic_Apathy1} : SNOPES DISAGREES WITH ME SO IT'S BECOME REALLY BAD Do you people fucking hear yourselves?", '>>{gaeuvyen} : Yeah, info *wars*, theyre at war with information.', '>>{DragnFyre} : Oh? Tell me then, what is so amazing about this evil demon. Bonus points if you can do it without a Trump comparison. Is she better, probably. Having to choose between dog shit and horse shit, however, is still a shitty choice.', ">>{ColossalMistake} : Sure she did. Maybe not as bad as some conservaice media is trying to claim, but the comments were pretty demeaning to Sanders supporters. First of all, there's millions of us who aren't even millenials. Second, to lump the largest age-related voting block into a handful of big groups and label them all disgruntled is fairly demeaning too. It's like she cannot admit, or won't, that she has serious shortcomings as a candidate and possibly there are..a handful of other reasons Sanders supporters aren't excited to jump on board with the oligarchy.", '>>{Chel_of_the_sea} : No, she just went on about how over-idealistic we were, then turned around and promised us what she said six months ago was impossible, now that she knows she needs our votes.', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : Hey, Hillary is not shit, she's month old expired milk at the *worst*.", '>>{MannequinFlyswatter} : We get it. Lets move on to the issues', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : I know, they're full explanations of how they came to their conclusions are just to inconvenient for my opinions.", '>>{hoffmad08} : Yeah, totally not insulting at all. Now vote for Hillary or else you stupid millenn--I mean cherished lifeblood of our nation?', '>>{Zlibservacratican} : Most of us, though, are not new to politics. Majority of Sanders supporters supported Obama for his first term. Most of us are not children. Most of us live in our own apartments. Most of us understand that politics is compromising. She understands that a lot of us did get our education, and that the job market isn\'t providing for us. But then she\'s turns around and calls it a mindset and not the economic reality we live in. She says they should "try their best to not be a wet blanket on idealism" but then wants to replace or goals with smaller goals and present them as bigger goals therefore being a wet blanket on idealism. I think a lot of you trying to excuse these lines aren\'t really understanding the kind of condescension she puts off here. If she truly understood the wall we face coming out of college, she wouldn\'t be speaking about people living on their parents basements. She\'d be talking about college graduates having to work years as interns with little pay before having a secure job. How "entry level" positions need 5 years experience beyond our degree. How a majority of positions are being consolidated after boomers retire or how older generations are holding onto their jobs longer and longer. I myself have a bachelor\'s of science, work in a lab, but only make $9 an hour. This is the reality we live in, not a "mindset."', '>>{entaro_tassadar} : They’re children of the Great Recession. And they are living in their parents’ basement. So she didn\'t call them "basement dwellers", but she said that they all live in their parents\' basements.', ">>{chunky_donuts} : So don't vote for her. Vote for someone else. Or stay home. Get over yourselves. Never seen such a sensitive self absorbed demographic in my life.", ">>{colormefeminist} : If Hillary isn't impeached first, she's probably in the very least going to be primaried against in 2020. She is, after all, extremely negligent with national security.", '>>{3Suze} : The Washington Examiner (that stalwart example of good journalism /s) posted the story and r/the_donald brigaded it. It was like perverse poetry in motion. Unfortunately it took a life of its own on FB through Bernie groups. Edit: I am a Bernie supporter and have a college degree. I tend bar and I live in a small house with 4 roommates.', ">>{spoiled_generation} : Fine, try to impeach her. I don't give a shit. And, if they can find someone that can beat her in a primary, I'm all for it. But honestly, we know neither of those things will happen.", '>>{afidak} : The fact checkers that are a husband and wife team that have a leftist bias?', ">>{ladyships} : no, it didn't. we took offense because of what she actually said. the trumpers didn't have to spin it for us. jesus.", '>>{JustDoc} : And yet, if we follow your advice, we will be to blame in the event that Trump wins the election. So much for party unity.', '>>{ladyships} : bingo. we have a much lower standard of living than our parents. the boomers pulled the ladder up after them.', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : You\'re embellishing by adding the "all" there. She was painting an image that it\'s hard to say doesn\'t apply to many young Bernie supporters who had to come home to live with parents, and carried that forward as a reason to look for a candidate promising larger changes. She sympathizes with that situation, and Bernie today said he absolutely agreed with the assessment. Lots of people are looking for any reason to hate her. This isn\'t it, and the alt-right heartily thanks those who put much stock in it.', '>>{Trumptron3000} : The concept of young person who lives in a basement is, in the modern day, considered derogatory. Flat out, full stop.', ">>{Byzantine279} : ...That was exactly what she did. You completely misread everything she said. It's almost amazing.", '>>{uhmmaybe} : > myself have a bachelor\'s of science, work in a lab, but only make $9 an hour. This is the reality we live in, not a "mindset." Honestly, just blame the boomers for your own shortcomings? Where is the personal responsibility? Take risks, make good decisions, and earn more if that is what you are looking for.', '>>{unverified_user} : You\'re offended that she used the word "mindset"? Are you *trying* to be offended?', '>>{Byzantine279} : Which is why the entire statement was prefaced with "some". And Sanders has described his own supporters in exactly the same way. Hell, many of them describe themselves in the same manner.', ">>{Byzantine279} : It certainly wasn't meant to be. You just want to be insulted. Her entire point was they were forced to do so by circumstance despite doing everything correctly. Ie there was nothing wrong with it.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : She literally said that she wanted young people to stay idealistic. There are way, way bigger things at stake in this election than microanalyzing the details of an 8-month old speech.', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : But they don't have any authority over reality. They put in the work and release their findings, but they don't own that process. Some say they have a bias; assuming that it's true, *anyone* can still read Clinton's full statements. Anyone who reads those statements without bias cannot conclude she insulted Bernie supporters, unless they don't understand what words are and how they form sentences.", ">>{Trumptron3000} : You can keep spinning your wheels, but the reality under the thin veneer of this weekend's narrative tells a different story: [it's caused enough damage that the campaign is taking time to figure out how to try and reverse it.](https://twitter.com/thehill/status/782732910126329856)", '>>{Byzantine279} : He specifically said Mexican immigrants are. He did not, however, say illegal in the entire speech where that line was used.', '>>{Zlibservacratican} : I did. That\'s what I\'m doing. This is the condescension in talking about here. My complaint is that the position I have should be offering more. And it\'s funny how you\'ve conveniently ignored all of my points and just went "hurr durr just blame the boomers for your problems." So screw off with that attitude.', ">>{Byzantine279} : Yes, because some people are complete morons. It's irritating how easily led people are. Also, that tweet is a lie.", ">>{xjayroox} : I would *love* Trump to toss out this accusation at the next debate. I gauran-fucking-tee she'll have a response along with another trap set if he does", '>>{xjayroox} : You do realize Bernie said she was correct, right?', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : Yes, yes they are. You have to try *so hard* to be offended by this.', ">>{uhmmaybe} : >My complaint is that the position I have should be offering more. Everyone thinks they deserve more. >So screw off with that attitude. I'm not here to coddle you. Blame whoever you want, get angry at me, say whatever you feel. That's your right, but I'm not impressed.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : Pretty much everyone will be to blame if he wins. Clinton voters for choosing her, Bernie/Gary/Jill voters who refused to out of spite, but most of all the voters Trump conned into voting for him. Best not go that route.', ">>{Zlibservacratican} : Ooh then that completely changed everything. If Bernie says it, then I must follow because I'm a millennial who only follows cults of personality.", '>>{Trumptron3000} : If it were just one instance of Hillary being condescending, this would not have been nearly as big of a story. This is now the *second* story to come out in a short span where, in her own words, she insults voters.', ">>{TooSmalley} : Can't wait for the level headed discussion that will follow this article /s", ">>{chunky_donuts} : Oh look. I'm faced with tough choices in life. It's all so unfair!", '>>{Byzantine279} : Your first mistake was when you said: > But then she\'s turns around and calls it a mindset and not the economic reality we live in. No, what she actually said was that that leads to a mindset where you feel the entire world needs to change, etc. Which is true. Those who are hurt by the system are usually the ones who want to change it the most, after all. AFter that you just continued compounding on that error. >She says they should "try their best to not be a wet blanket on idealism" but then wants to replace or goals with smaller goals and present them as bigger goals therefore being a wet blanket on idealism. No. What she said was **she** didn\'t want to be a wet blanket on idealism and kill the enthusiasm of Sanders supporters. But that she feared that their lofty goals were not politically achievable, since at least in the short term the House will be controlled by Republicans, and they would sooner die than go along with a progressive agenda. So she wants to help your goals, but fears she can\'t, and doesn\'t want to promise the stars knowing that it\'s unlikely she will be able to deliver. Effectively you completely changed your pronouns twice, and so flipped where things were ascribed, completely changing the meaning of the speech', ">>{Bebedvd} : Because they can't get the jobs they're entitled to after doing everything they were supposed to. That's not the same as calling someone a loser for living in their parents basement because they lack talent, ambition, and social skills. It's not a flat out full stop situation. Context matters here.", ">>{snorkleboy} : Is your premise 'they are leftist so they cannot be right'?", '>>{Psy1} : Why not blame the system? During the long boom anyone with a University degree was guaranteed a secured job as employers would fight each other for engineers and scientists to the point many companies had their own internal education departments to train up their workers. Then you had DARPA allowing a large number of students to simply becoming professional researches for the US Government in the University. Today job security and opportunity is a shadow of what it was during the long boom yet you are implying this is a personal failing.', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : > *Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.*', ">>{Byzantine279} : Or as I've discovered below, misread a few words and hence completely change the meaning of a few sentences.", '>>{F22Rapture} : I mean, you say that, but 6 months ago it would have been all that /r/politics needed. Anybody trying to defend it with context would be downvoted to the bottom of the page.', ">>{snorkleboy} : No trump did say that some, he assumes, are good people. He recognizes that good Mexicans exist he just hasn't met one yet.", ">>{unverified_user} : I read what you wrote. I never read Hillary talking about how Millennials have a bunch of made-up fantasy problems, because she's never said anything like that.", ">>{Gorgonaut666} : As an ardent Sanders supporter, she obviously did not. I don't think she thinks really highly of us (the feeling is mutual), but she clearly was going for empathy.", ">>{Mr_Montague} : Not only has she insulted them (in private to boot). She also used her clout to get the DNC to make it impossible for him to win the nomination. I know all it'll probably take is a thousand articles to convince Bernie supporters it's okay and everything's fine but it still won't change the reality of what they did to the man and the millions of people who put their heart and soul and money into the guy and his ideas because he WASN'T Hillary Clinton.", '>>{TooSmalley} : What she said. >Some are new to politics completely.They’re children of the Great Recession. And they are living in their parents’ basement. They feel they got their education and the jobs that are available to them are not at all what they envisioned for themselves. And they don’t see much of a future Thats the basement dweller part people are freaking out about.', '>>{NutDraw} : You are free to choose your own path. However, you\'re not absolved of responsibility for its consequences. Look, I\'m sorry people don\'t like the set of decisions they\'re faced with. But you know what? That\'s fucking life. The most frustrating thing about hearing these lines from people claiming to have supported Bernie is that they\'re completely ignoring one of the central tenants of his revolution- change is hard, takes time, focus, and doesn\'t happen with one election. So we lost an election. It\'s not the end if the world. But if Trump wins it literally may be. Is that worth a fucking statement? It\'s not about "falling in line," it\'s about stopping a mad man and con artist from getting the highest office in the land. None of us or our opinions are special snowflakes next to that. People need to get over themselves.', '>>{Thegoldenmean19876} : Bingo. She painted Sanders supporters as pitiable people, uninformed people. She keeps doing this. She honestly believes she and her Wall Street financiers are smarter than everybody else She refuses to admit that she is a pitable and piss poor candidate.', '>>{hallaquelle} : Fake title. The word "insult" does not even appear anywhere on that page. Furthermore, the only thing that this fact check verifies is that Hillary did not use the specific words "basement dwellers" which we knew already. The reality is that I am a Bernie supporter, and I found several parts of this private speech to be insulting. It\'s funny that throughout the entire primary the narrative by the Hillary camp was that Bernie supporters were "mansplaining" and "whitesplaining" which was ridiculous and sad because there were supporters of every candidate doing the same thing, but of course that has never stopped Hillary supporters from condescendingly "Demsplaining" to Bernie supporters that their views are idealistic and that only Hillary\'s pay-to-play incrementalism is pragmatic and effective. And by the way, I get more insulted every time I see Hillary supporters try to spin the crap out of this story. Saying that I wasn\'t insulted is even more insulting. Is there an end to your condescension?', ">>{Egg-MacGuffin} : Stop trying to shove words in my face, I already said I made my decision! ^^/s In all seriousness, it may be blunt, and use a phrase that's typically pejorative, but anyone who reads the context shouldn't be confused.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : Wherein she never says "basement dweller," and actually came off quite sympathetic. To the point that Bernie said he agreed with her assessment just today, and dismissed any perceived tension as normal for a campaign.', '>>{Lurker_Coteaz} : Have you actually read her comments? She was sympathizing with young Sanders supporters. Seriously, just go read the whole thing.', '>>{Egg-MacGuffin} : I had a low-energy leftist try to convince me the Earth was round once. What a loser. Sad!', '>>{Egg-MacGuffin} : Quick, full stop before I have to read any more to understand her meaning!', ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Why is it derogatory? It's a comment on how the economy is failing the youth of the nation.", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : > She says they should "try their best to not be a wet blanket on idealism" but then wants to replace or goals with smaller goals and present them as bigger goals therefore being a wet blanket on idealism. I don\'t think she has any problem with stuff like Sanders plans, but they would never get through Congress. His plans required large raises on taxes and that is something that the House would not give in on. Clinton\'s plans don\'t go as far but also require small tax hikes. Also she said "these are children of the Great Recession" so I think she is ackowledging that our economy is still suffering from the effects of 2008.', '>>{Zlibservacratican} : >"They **feel** that they got their education and the jobs that are available to them are not at all what they envisioned for themselves. And they don\'t see much of a future. >"That is a mindset that is really affecting their policies." She\'s right, but I\'m not wrong either. It\'s more than just what we feel, more than what we envisioned, more than a mindset, and that\'s subtle condescension, wether or not you are willing to admit it. It\'s systemic problems within the job market, problems that I indicated before. Like you admit, the world needs to change and we just wanted a stronger forceful leader who doesn\'t cry about the opposition\'s existence. We wanted someone who would go to the table with a stronger stance, so that when they do inevitably compromise, there was at least an attempt made to move the goalposts closer to our side, and during the primary, that was Bernie Sanders, who presented his lofty goals as just that, goals, not promises. And we understood that. >"We should try not to be a wet blanket on idealism -- you want people to be idealistic, you want them to set big goals -- but to take what we can achieve now and try to present them as bigger goals." I appreciate her words here. But she\'s betraying herself when she wants to present what she thinks can be achieved as bigger goals than what they are, preemptively compromised goals, smaller than the ones we wish to achieve. And knowing the republicans, they will take advantage of that. They push hard for their ideals, and democrats cave to their demands like they\'ve done for decades. It\'s how regulations have been rolled back, and regulators defunded, and social services cut. It\'s how the public option failed during the fight for the ACA. Look, in the end, there really isn\'t anyone else to vote for. But this attitude is a problem for many millennials like me, it\'s what is causing the enthusiasm gap. So she\'s going to become president, but we have no illusions of achieving great change under her leadership.', ">>{JustDoc} : You know what, you got me. Hillary all the way! Check it out - you know nothing about me, where I have been or what I have done with my life. Want a glimpse, check my post history. Many of Bernie's supporters are veterans - myself included. I have fought and nearly given my life several times in order to support the policies that were laid out by our current and previous administrations, and I did it willingly. I think I've made more difficult decisions than most of the population could ever dream of making. That said, I will vote in this election, just as I have every election; primary and general, state and federal, since I was 18. When faced with the current popular choices, I refuse to vote for the lesser of the two evils and I refuse to vote for someone just to keep a flawed electoral process in tact. This is NOT the fault of the common voter, but the fault of those few that are more powerful that the common voter who can be leveraged and bought. Why do you think overturning Citizens United is such a big deal? I do not believe that either of the popular candidates are fit to hold the office for various reasons and my vote will reflect that. If you wish to continue propagating the illusion of choice, then that is your birthright as an American, but I will not. That too, is my right.", ">>{Trump_1776} : Unacceptable Title is right. Hillary insults everyone everytime she opens her mouth. You people here are really working overtime to twist Hillary Clinton into an honest person who isn't a criminal who is going to jail. WONDERFUL WEDNESDAY WIKILEAKS. Good luck hamstering that into a Hillary victory.", ">>{chunky_donuts} : Honestly I don't care about your story or what you think.", ">>{Trump_1776} : It's amazing how we've watched crooked's crimes and misdemeanors go on right before our eyes for 30+ years and the trail of bodies and cover ups she's left in her wake. It's amazing that she's back again and won't go away. It's amazing that there are people willing to hamster and shill for her here and across the media. AMAZING. WONDERFUL WEDNESDAY WIKILEAKS.", '>>{Skyrick} : > Bernie/Gary/Jill voters who refused to out of spite, This bugs me. If I want to vote for Gary/Jill then why do people insist that that is a vote for Trump/Clinton over a sign that the big two have ignored a demographic and had them vote for their interest elsewhere instead.'], [">>{Arc1ZD} : Clinton Wins Third Debate, Gains Ground as 'Presidential'", ">>{poopy_mcgee} : Some nutjob's personal wordpress site is not a credible media source.", ">>{sakumar} : Clinton: 60% Trump: 31% That's quite a margin! At least some Trump supporters thought Clinton won the third debate.", '>>{SirMontego} : This is the only summary I could find that tracked various commentators from news sources. The tally was Clinton 14, Trump 1. http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2016/Pres/Maps/Oct21.html#item-2', ">>{formeraide} : But Gallup isn't. Face the facts - outside of your echo chamber, America doesn't think Trump is worthy. Which he isn't.", '>>{hearthneewb} : Putting Trump anywhere close to being equal to Hillary at this point is Bias towards Trump. You can be so unbiased that you become biased and making Trump look good is one of those cases', '>>{paraconformity} : Only her second best. Happily, the margin of her victories correlates with the viewership ratings of each debate.', ">>{PetPsychicDetective} : So your sources are 1) An opinion piece with no statistics and laughably incorrect predictions: >Given Trump’s performance, I expect to see some stories about panic in the Clinton universe by the time the Sunday shows roll around. Before tonight’s debate, the conventional wisdom was that Trump was collapsing — and when conventional wisdom is set this far ahead of election day, the conventional wisdom is often wrong. 2) A flash poll that notes it is unscientific, which means it's open to brigading 3) A summary which notes that Hillary won according to actually valid CNN post-debate debate polls What are you proving here?", '>>{SirMontego} : I wonder what the numbers would look like if bias viewers were removed from the polling. For example 26% of those polled for the first debate said Trump had a "good understanding of the issues." Recall, that in response to a cyber security question, Trump said "I have a son—he’s 10 years old. He has computers. He is so good with these computers. It’s unbelievable." If that\'s not evidence he has ZERO understanding of cyber security, I\'m not sure what is.', '>>{rdjnk} : The washington and fortune articles are opinion pieces, not polls. As for AOL, this is what they say > according to the unscientific survey that ran on AOL.com during the debate.', ">>{Kronos_Selai} : The best thing to read was that the vast majority was ready to accept the outcome of the election. 1/5 say they won't, but that's better than a 50-50 split of the country. I'm guessing a few states will say they want to split from the union like they do after every election, or begin calling for her impeachment. Probably some violence in the south, but I'm sure the CIA and FBI got that stuff under control considering how easily those pieces of shit were caught planning to bomb the refugee mosque and apartment complex.", ">>{TrentonJ} : Winning a debate is an opinion, not a fact. Trump supporters said Trump won too, doesn't mean it's true.", ">>{C6O1999} : Winning a debate means the majority of people decided you won. The majority of opinion is what matters. But that's not what I was referring to anyway."]]

classify and reply

['>>{_AMuse_} : Help/Question: Does this still count as cracking the screen?', ">>{_AMuse_} : I want to get this repaired by Apple and not a 3rd party business. I bought it about 2 months ago, without AppleCare+. Would I still have to pay the $129 fee or is there a warranty that I'm still covered by for this? Thank you.", '>>{DudeThatsErin} : Applecare+ got updated so it is $29 for screen replacements as long as it does not interfere with the logic board or anything besides the glass itself.', ">>{DudeThatsErin} : All phones come with 1 year of Applecare+ included. It is the 1 year manufacturer's warranty that all devices have. So, yes, he does... for the first year only though.", ">>{Macintoshmar} : Really depends who you get and if they feel bad for you. Technically speaking you didn't crack the display, but that's pretty much the same thing. Hopefully they show you some mercy and repair as if you have Apple Care.", ">>{Macintoshmar} : AppleCare+ must be purchased extra unless you're on the iPhone upgrade plan. The basic Applecare service is 1 year included, but doesn't cover physical damage.", '>>{jessicaho656} : This is false. All iPhones come with an AppleCare limited 1-year warranty. AppleCare+ must be purchased at time of sale or within 60 days of the purchase of the phone.', ">>{Rsidhuu} : AppleCare is something else. The one that comes with phones doesn't cover you breaking your screen.", ">>{phonetechguru4} : Oh how it angers me to see people unknowingly spread false information on the internet. No. no iPhones come with AppleCare+ (---see the PLUS sign? That's different from AppleCare (no PLUS sign)) for free. If every iPhone came with AppleCare+ and screen replacements for all were $29 in the first year, my business would be demolished. Hence, that is not the case.", '>>{JD404} : If this is a "hairline crack" (and it looks like it is) and there\'s no damage on the body of the phone, apple will replace it for free. (Because hairline cracks are usually a manufacturing defect rather than actual user damage) Also, if it\'s been less than 60 days, you can still buy AppleCare+ if you want.', ">>{_AMuse_} : I can't physically feel any crack, does that mean it'd be a hairline crack? Thanks"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{_AMuse_} : Help/Question: Does this still count as cracking the screen?', ">>{_AMuse_} : I want to get this repaired by Apple and not a 3rd party business. I bought it about 2 months ago, without AppleCare+. Would I still have to pay the $129 fee or is there a warranty that I'm still covered by for this? Thank you.", '>>{DudeThatsErin} : Applecare+ got updated so it is $29 for screen replacements as long as it does not interfere with the logic board or anything besides the glass itself.', ">>{DudeThatsErin} : All phones come with 1 year of Applecare+ included. It is the 1 year manufacturer's warranty that all devices have. So, yes, he does... for the first year only though.", ">>{Macintoshmar} : Really depends who you get and if they feel bad for you. Technically speaking you didn't crack the display, but that's pretty much the same thing. Hopefully they show you some mercy and repair as if you have Apple Care.", ">>{Macintoshmar} : AppleCare+ must be purchased extra unless you're on the iPhone upgrade plan. The basic Applecare service is 1 year included, but doesn't cover physical damage.", '>>{jessicaho656} : This is false. All iPhones come with an AppleCare limited 1-year warranty. AppleCare+ must be purchased at time of sale or within 60 days of the purchase of the phone.', ">>{Rsidhuu} : AppleCare is something else. The one that comes with phones doesn't cover you breaking your screen.", ">>{phonetechguru4} : Oh how it angers me to see people unknowingly spread false information on the internet. No. no iPhones come with AppleCare+ (---see the PLUS sign? That's different from AppleCare (no PLUS sign)) for free. If every iPhone came with AppleCare+ and screen replacements for all were $29 in the first year, my business would be demolished. Hence, that is not the case.", '>>{JD404} : If this is a "hairline crack" (and it looks like it is) and there\'s no damage on the body of the phone, apple will replace it for free. (Because hairline cracks are usually a manufacturing defect rather than actual user damage) Also, if it\'s been less than 60 days, you can still buy AppleCare+ if you want.', ">>{_AMuse_} : I can't physically feel any crack, does that mean it'd be a hairline crack? Thanks"]]

classify and reply

[">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : What are you talking about man? At one point a long time ago the KKK was a democratic constituency, therefore the democrats are still associated with and represent them/s I think the most obvious reason as to why the Democratic Party no longer is the party they were all those years ago is the fact that the south is now overwhelmingly republican for the most part. You don't see democrats winning Alabama Louisiana South Carolina etc. anymore.", '>>{scrambledeggplants} : I actually blame the Unabomber on MKULTRA, myself. The KKK was founded by southerners.', '>>{StrngBrew} : Latinos for Trump Founder Warns of ‘Taco Trucks on Every Corner’ Under Clinton', '>>{C6O1999} : Uhhh, is that supposed to be a negative? Sounds like a selling point to me.', ">>{takeashill_pill} : It's always telling when Republicans can't name a civil rights achievement of their's after the 19th century.", '>>{LaoZhe} : I agree. Some food trucks sell better food than chain restaurants.', '>>{SaltHash} : The Democratic Party is no longer the party they once were because they promote tolerance for all races, religions, LGBT, et al. Additionally, Democrats are not winning in the south because of various reasons that include gerrymandering and voters who still cling to bigotry.', '>>{xynix_ie} : Well if they could park one on my corner I would be perfectly happy with it. Where do I sign up? Do I have to email Clinton herself? Does she even still have an email account?', '>>{turtledan87} : I thought it was cool of all the Dem ladies to wear the robes again at Trumps speech as a throwback', '>>{bitfriend} : Dixiecrats returned to the Democratic Party in 1976 through Georgian Jimmy Carter. Even though they voted for Reagan, Dixiecrats really only left the party *after* the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, which was signed by Arkansan Bill Clinton. That was when Congress started being a lot redder than it was during the Cold War, except for 2006-10.', '>>{2ndprize} : Imagine the nerve of these people to come her, purchase equipment and supplies, start a small business, engage in capitalism, and sell delicious food people like. What dicks', ">>{Sidwill} : That's it, I'm switching from Trump to Clinton. I live is a pasty white suburb and the only Mexican food available is at the fuckin Chili's. This is a game changer.", '>>{BurnerAcctNo1} : People need to start yelling "you\'re all democrats" at them at rallies, then sit back, hit record, and enjoy the festivities.', '>>{broniesnstuff} : Well this makes me more likely to vote for Clinton. She should put that in her platform. Tacos are delicious.', '>>{Ovedya2011} : That would be the only positive of a Clinton Presidency.', '>>{EmptyCalories} : Taco trucks on every street corner? Yes please! What could be more American than tacos?', '>>{StrngBrew} : Seriously, this should be a campaign promise for Hillary. A taco truck on every corner!', '>>{Senseisntsocommon} : You added a some in there that does not belong.', ">>{muxman} : Seriously the only positive reason so far to elect her. All others have been in some form, she's not as bad as Trump.", '>>{ThinkMinty} : Wait, really? Did we actually save one from all that spray-tanned sound and fury, signifying nothing?', ">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : And even after the assault ban, Clinton carried multiple southern states when being reelected(Missouri Arkansas Louisiana Tennesse West Virginia Kentucky and Florida, though Florida and Missouri were swing states so it's not as big a deal as carrying the solid south)", ">>{gza_liquidswords} : Well if you know nothing about the history of American politics you might buy into what D'Souza and Cruz are peddling.", ">>{zyme86} : And in my state Oregon in the 1920s and 30s the klan openly wore their robes on the Salem state capital (I can't find it off hand but here they are martching down the middle of [Ashland](https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/ku_klux_klan/#.WLWkZzxHaEc) ) Funny enough times change", '>>{jokerZwild} : Well, conservatives need something to hold on to.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : What are you talking about man? At one point a long time ago the KKK was a democratic constituency, therefore the democrats are still associated with and represent them/s I think the most obvious reason as to why the Democratic Party no longer is the party they were all those years ago is the fact that the south is now overwhelmingly republican for the most part. You don't see democrats winning Alabama Louisiana South Carolina etc. anymore.", '>>{scrambledeggplants} : I actually blame the Unabomber on MKULTRA, myself. The KKK was founded by southerners.', ">>{takeashill_pill} : It's always telling when Republicans can't name a civil rights achievement of their's after the 19th century.", '>>{SaltHash} : The Democratic Party is no longer the party they once were because they promote tolerance for all races, religions, LGBT, et al. Additionally, Democrats are not winning in the south because of various reasons that include gerrymandering and voters who still cling to bigotry.', '>>{turtledan87} : I thought it was cool of all the Dem ladies to wear the robes again at Trumps speech as a throwback', '>>{bitfriend} : Dixiecrats returned to the Democratic Party in 1976 through Georgian Jimmy Carter. Even though they voted for Reagan, Dixiecrats really only left the party *after* the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, which was signed by Arkansan Bill Clinton. That was when Congress started being a lot redder than it was during the Cold War, except for 2006-10.', '>>{BurnerAcctNo1} : People need to start yelling "you\'re all democrats" at them at rallies, then sit back, hit record, and enjoy the festivities.', ">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : And even after the assault ban, Clinton carried multiple southern states when being reelected(Missouri Arkansas Louisiana Tennesse West Virginia Kentucky and Florida, though Florida and Missouri were swing states so it's not as big a deal as carrying the solid south)", ">>{gza_liquidswords} : Well if you know nothing about the history of American politics you might buy into what D'Souza and Cruz are peddling.", ">>{zyme86} : And in my state Oregon in the 1920s and 30s the klan openly wore their robes on the Salem state capital (I can't find it off hand but here they are martching down the middle of [Ashland](https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/ku_klux_klan/#.WLWkZzxHaEc) ) Funny enough times change", '>>{jokerZwild} : Well, conservatives need something to hold on to.'], ['>>{StrngBrew} : Latinos for Trump Founder Warns of ‘Taco Trucks on Every Corner’ Under Clinton', '>>{C6O1999} : Uhhh, is that supposed to be a negative? Sounds like a selling point to me.', '>>{LaoZhe} : I agree. Some food trucks sell better food than chain restaurants.', '>>{xynix_ie} : Well if they could park one on my corner I would be perfectly happy with it. Where do I sign up? Do I have to email Clinton herself? Does she even still have an email account?', '>>{2ndprize} : Imagine the nerve of these people to come her, purchase equipment and supplies, start a small business, engage in capitalism, and sell delicious food people like. What dicks', ">>{Sidwill} : That's it, I'm switching from Trump to Clinton. I live is a pasty white suburb and the only Mexican food available is at the fuckin Chili's. This is a game changer.", '>>{broniesnstuff} : Well this makes me more likely to vote for Clinton. She should put that in her platform. Tacos are delicious.', '>>{Ovedya2011} : That would be the only positive of a Clinton Presidency.', '>>{EmptyCalories} : Taco trucks on every street corner? Yes please! What could be more American than tacos?', '>>{StrngBrew} : Seriously, this should be a campaign promise for Hillary. A taco truck on every corner!', '>>{Senseisntsocommon} : You added a some in there that does not belong.', ">>{muxman} : Seriously the only positive reason so far to elect her. All others have been in some form, she's not as bad as Trump.", '>>{ThinkMinty} : Wait, really? Did we actually save one from all that spray-tanned sound and fury, signifying nothing?']]

classify and reply

['>>{Shitposter123456789} : On the airwaves, Obama is stepping up for down-ballot Democrats like never before', ">>{darwinn69} : The kids are grown and almost out of the house. I think he's going to be ramping up his community organizing skills the next few years and help Dems retake the house.", '>>{jwall7} : Maybe he should do his job and stop trying to sway the election', ">>{UvonTheDeplorable} : Hold the House. We're taking it this year, you gotta believe.", '>>{F22Rapture} : It\'s going to be damn difficult to hold the Senate in 2018 given the makeup of that "class" of senators', ">>{UvonTheDeplorable} : Dem Senators in most of those red states have been there forever. And I honestly don't expect to see coherent conservative resistance from the then-defunct GOP.", ">>{allisslothed} : >It's rigged.. it's all rigged! How dare the president not want all of his work from the past 8 years reversed/attacked by his political opponents once he's gone. I'd say he **IS** doing his job. It's not like Congress will be giving him any bills to sign, or appointing his judges. Might as well fight so his predecessor has it easier.", ">>{j0phus} : Who wants to bet that he doesn't show up to help Zephyr in he high-profile and super tight race?", '>>{MrMesister} : Except when Bernie Sanders runs for reelection in 2018. Better believe the Bern will berninate.', ">>{SpookyKid94} : That's what people keep forgetting. If Bannon gets his way, the GOP will splinter between Romney/McCaine Republicans, conservatives, and Trumpies. This will kill election efforts across the board... unless we see the same thing as a reaction in the Democratic party. Most real liberals are sick of the party's garbage. Edit: Most real liberals = all the cali socialist millenials I know. Generalizations are a mistake.", '>>{Karrionhardt} : Getting a really strong "The shields are down! Attack the Trump Star\'s main reactor!" vibe from the news today.', ">>{moxy801} : Strange he wasn't more active in doing that when it would have done his own presidency some good.", ">>{WiEaglesFi} : No, no. Corporate Democrats are real Democrats. Actual liberals need to shut up and fall in line. The DNC needs to spend money to get Dems elected...just not the kind of Dems that want the party to live up to its ideals. Zephyr's views on making life better for Americans and not letting corporate oligarchs break the law with impunity are crazy and unAmerican. How could Obama support someone like that?", '>>{engchlbw704} : Many "real" liberals are salivating at undoing Reagan\'s damage, not holding out for some utopian candidate, and happy that for the first time in two generations the country is accelerating back to being center left under "the party\'s garbage." You were probably lauded for promoting marriage equality, many of us remember being jeered, insulted, and dismissed for supporting it.', ">>{WiEaglesFi} : His job is to sit down and shut up. Oh, there's a vacancy on the Supreme Court? Get fucked loser! You want to help Americans live better lives? Not on our watch! You got Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions without a war? What a pussy! He needs to do his job and sit on his ass while a historically obstructionist congress tries to keep him from fixing out country's problems.", ">>{WiEaglesFi} : > many of us remember being jeered, insulted, and dismissed for supporting it. That's one of the biggest reasons I supported Bernie over Hillary. He took the right, and politically difficult path while she took the politically expedient choice and decided to agree that homosexuals deserve equal rights when the polls changed.", '>>{SpookyKid94} : But this is still the party that supports bombing the shit out if everyone and violating the privacy of all Americans. Liberals spent 8 years fighting the Bush administration for wiretapping and their foreign policy just to watch their party increase both of those tenfold. I get you, cooperation is important, but both party establishments support the same bullshit policies.', ">>{engchlbw704} : It takes both to win the ideological battle. Being pro marriage equality meant losing your election in most states in the 90's. If everyone did what Bernie did, the GOP would have passed a constitutuonal amendment banning gay marriage. That means no marriage equality today. You need to have a public and private policy so that you can keep the other side out of power long enough to convince the public why your private side is right.", '>>{engchlbw704} : And what party do you think is more likely to end warrentless wiretapping or bombing? The Democrats have a plurality of their party against this, while the majority of Republicans supported it pre-Trump. You do realize how ridiculous it is to state Obama bombed more, much less ten times more, than we did during the actual Iraq War, right?', '>>{WiEaglesFi} : Hey, based on your screenname, you\'re 22ish. That\'s a very astute observation for someone who hasn\'t seen very many elections take place. What you\'re seeing is that everyone in power wants things to stay the same. Forget party for a minute and look at the behavior of rich, powerful people. They want things to stay the way they are. That\'s why Hillary gets such favorable coverage by the media and people in charge. She\'s the embodiment of the status quo. When Mit Romeny, George Bush Sr., and Henry Kissinger all support the "Democrat" you really need to evaluate what the fuck is going on. What you\'re seeing is that status quo bias among people doing well in the status quo has the most explanatory power when looking at politics. It has way more predictive value than political party. As an old head, it makes me happy to see younger people who see through the bullshit they\'re fed.', ">>{Roric} : It's not uncommon for lame duck presidents to campaign for the next. Ronald Reagan did it for George H.W. Al Gore and John McCain both did not want Bill Clinton and George W. to campaign for them, due do their perceived weaknesses. Before Reagan you have to go back some ways when it was relevant -- Eisenhower gave late support to Nixon in 1960 when it looked like Nixon needed it.", ">>{SpookyKid94} : Spying increased tenfold. Bombing was absurdly high considering he pulled out of Iraq and reduced troop numbers in Afghanistan. 9/10 people killed in drone strikes aren't the intended target. I generally view Obama as a good president and obviously the democratic party is more sane than the GOP. My problem is that liberals are a voting block that gets dicked over pretty hard when it comes to anything but social issues. If they had the opportunity to win elections as liberals instead of Democrats in service to the party, why wouldn't they do that? Edit: obviously obviously", '>>{dodoconundrum} : Dude, Bernie came out fully for gay marriage in 2009 - for years before Hillary did. They were both the same age when they respectively did it (he being 4-5 years older than her). As late as 2006, he was saying he was pro civil union but not gay marriage - the same stance as Hillary and most elected democrats.', '>>{weblowinherseys} : I have a feeling that Dems are going to be overwhelmingly strong around 2024-2032. Obama is going to be as influential as the Clintons have been to the strength of the party by the time he hangs his hat up. After 2032 or maybe even before then the GOP will have no choice but to move left, but until their hardcore base dies out they are truly fucked. I mean they also have a vice grip on the majority of state governments, but hey let this democrat dream.', '>>{the2belo} : Oh yeah, Obama Calrissian leading the way. "Bernie! Michelle! All fighters follow me! Hahahahaha I told you they\'d do it!"', ">>{Obvious_Moose} : He's got a really good shot at success with this I'd say. The man has charisma that many politicians lack and if anyone can inspire young people or any disenfranchised voters to get out and vote it's him and Bernie", ">>{threemileallan} : God I hope you're right. Honestlu, Romney should work with Obama to redraw all the gerrymandered districts. Because those lines let the Republicans be held hostage to tje most extreme wings of their party.", '>>{threemileallan} : Not even a star wars geek but that made me laugh', '>>{Valarauth} : Congress will block anything else he tries to do. Solution? Spend the time getting a new Congress.', ">>{ph33randloathing} : I image he rather enjoys knocking down all of the obstructing reps who, in his eyes, hamstrung his administration. I can't say I blame him.", ">>{GeorgeXKennan} : That's the exact game plan he's already announced. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/obama-holder-redistricting-gerrymandering-229868", '>>{laxamericana} : How quickly things change. Remember how the Democratic Senate candidate in 2014 who refused to state whether she voted for Obama?', '>>{puroloco} : Nah, he thought he could do it all himself', ">>{ripsa} : When Bannon gets his way. I can't see the GOP uniting when a least two of its factions and their media organisations are actively competing against each other. I.e. Romney/McCain Republicans & Fox News vs Alt-right Trumpers & Breitbart/Infowars/Trump TV. The question is will the Social Conservatives/Evangelicals follow their own leader (Cruz or Pence maybe) making it a 3 way fight or will they ultimately back one of the above two factions?", ">>{T1mac} : These pillars of integrity will stand up for what's right especially when the opinion polls show his approval rating hits the highest point in his presidency at 55%.", ">>{T1mac} : It's clear that if it were 30 to 40 years ago, Obama would be a Republican. He and Hillary are clearly centrist, and there's no doubt that irritates Progressives. But you have to look at where we are as a country. The Republicans have jerked the politics so far right that they make Hillary look like a raging liberal. Just remember, to go left, you have to get to the center first.", '>>{Furoan} : ...does that make Bill Han Solo? ...or possibly Leia Organa. The Trumpsters have them at microphone point, and then Bill moves his arm and reveals a VHS tape...', '>>{Krilion} : Because it turns out the beat revenge is a pasta salad.', '>>{Scaryclouds} : Bush was extremely unpopular by the end of his term in office, with good reason, it was far less that he had any sort of personal/political disagreements with McCain and more neither McCain and the RNC wanted him out there stumping for McCain/the party.', ">>{redcoinman} : Almost as if she's busy doing something else lately...", '>>{TheManWhoWasNotShort} : With how young Obama is, and how beloved he is, it will be really interesting to watch his post-presidency.', ">>{LATABOM} : I wonder if he realizes that a Dem supermajority is just going to make it easier for Hillary to pass TPP, increase military and financial support for the House of Saud and Israel, go hard after whistleblowers and increase the NSA's scope and abilities, go back on promises for free state college tuition, further deregulate and/or turn a blind eye to Wall Street, and pretend there's nothing she can do about Obamacare crumbling?", ">>{nosayso} : Hopefully 2 years from now we'll be doing the same. Off-presidential cycle Democratic races have been a fucking catastrophe and mostly consisted of throwing Obama under the bus. Maybe Obama should be the new DNC chair?", '>>{frontierparty} : Straight ticket Dem is the only way for progressives to vote right now and for the next 3 or 4 years if they want to see the kind of change that progressives actually want to see.', '>>{Shitposter123456789} : You realize all those things are more likely under a Republican Senate, right? The left is far more likely to reject those policies than a Republican congress.', ">>{nosayso} : That was truly an embarrassment, Democrats would be so much stronger as a party if they'd grow a fucking spine once in a while.", '>>{frontierparty} : We can have it this year if all eligible Millenials vote.', ">>{frontierparty} : We have all been expecting the GOPs hardcore base to die out but a lot of their base is in their 30-50s. I mean that is where a lot of the Tea Party is demographically. Millenials and the younger gerneration are overwhelmingly progressive but if they don't show up to vote, nothing will change and nothing will stick. The silver lining is that Millenials are getting older and with age comes more investment in politics and commitment to voting.", ">>{Kriieod} : That's a hell of a compliment, and well deserved.", ">>{zbaile1074} : I hope you're right. Here in Missouri the only reason Claire McCaskill won her senate seat again was Todd Akin's 'legitimate rape' gaffe, I'm not hopeful for her 2018 chances unless the republicans run another total moron.", ">>{zbaile1074} : > He took the right, and politically difficult path sure if you mean that claiming gay marriage is a 'states rights' issue and not saying anything about how gay marriage should be legal everywhere in the nineties is the right path", ">>{Barron_Cyber} : I wonder if part of this is because dws is out of the dnc now. I remember in 2011 he couldn't get anyone to a pear with him. The party as a whole was running from him. Now they are running towards him", '>>{zbaile1074} : does that mean chelsea is going to kill bill when she becomes sith?', '>>{Tobias_Z} : The DNC really needs to start focusing on their ground game in the mid-terms. Democrats get slaughtered by the GOP in off presidential years because the DNC does not help. They really need to mobilize in order to keep power. It starts at the state legislature and makes its way up to congress.', ">>{LATABOM} : No, I realize that those things are more likely with a democratic supermajority than slim majority. 2 or 3 democrats who don't support those things make less of a difference in a Dem supermajority than in a 50/50 or 52/48 split. There are realistically only a handful of Dems who won't go along with the things I listed (and some of that handful can easily be coerced by the DNC and/or Hillary machine), and if Dems control 60-65% of the house and senate, those Dems can and will effectively be ignored and/or only paid lip service by a Clinton administration. Hillary has only flip-flopped on TPP and taxpayer-funded state college in an effort to win the election and will flop back again once her power is secured. In terms of Israel/Saud support, prison for whistleblowers, deregulation of wallstreet and a healthcare solution that protects Big Pharma and the Healthcare Industry's profits, you just have to look at what Hillary and Bill have supported over the past 30 years of their political careers to predict what they'll do when they're back in power.", ">>{Barron_Cyber} : That would've been the perfect thing they needed with Sarah Palin.", '>>{Tobias_Z} : > When Mit Romeny, George Bush Sr., and Henry Kissinger all support the "Democrat" you really need to evaluate what the fuck is going on. It\'s simple, Donald Trump is terrifying to literally everyone. How hard is that to see?', '>>{Tobias_Z} : Bush was toxic. McCain had to distance himself from Bush.', '>>{John-Carlton-King} : Unless he uses his bully pulpit to make it bigger.', ">>{Mike_Kermin} : ... Yes. You do need a public and private policy. But there's a leap between that and praising someone for sitting on the sidelines while something bad is happening.", '>>{foamyhomey} : The worked in the general election. Midterms are different. The millennial turnout in 2014 where I live in CA was like 16%', '>>{NewClayburn} : One year I wish the Democrats would just throw the presidential election to focus on congress instead.', ">>{SSHeretic} : It really is an interesting and unique situation in modern politics. If we go back to the 70's, Nixon resigned in disgrace, Ford left in defeat having never won a Presidential election, Carter left in a crushing defeat after one term, Reagan left just shy of 78 years old and suffering from dementia, H. W. Bush left as an unpopular one term president with approval ratings around 30%, Clinton left as amid a number of scandals, and W. Bush left with record low approval ratings around 20%. Obama will leave as a young, healthy, scandal free, popular President who remains an extremely compelling public speaker. Where Reagan had to fade into the background because of his health and Clinton needed to fade into the background because of his philandering, Obama has every reason and ability to stay in the spotlight and continue to have influence in politics and policy. It certainly looks like he's poised be a valuable asset for the Democratic Party (and liberal causes in general) for decades.", '>>{Thethirdtoken} : Old people vote in midterms, intelligence skipped a generation.', ">>{Shitposter123456789} : So you think those openly in favor of those policies (most of the GOP) would be less likely to reject that those those openly against those policies (most of the Dems)? I get that you may not trust the Dems to stick to their word, but I don't understand that logic.", ">>{rollerhen} : He's not moderate enough to help, he would actually hurt in many areas. And he's not popular with minority voters.", '>>{rollerhen} : Do you mean to say it skipped the millennial generation?', '>>{Baseproduct} : He doesn\'t really have to go out and talk about issues, though. He can just show up to a rally, say "Senator X has been a fantastic partner in our revolution," and peace out. Merely showing up to a rally will drive turnout with younger Democrats, because he\'s wildly popular with them.', ">>{rollerhen} : Here are the facts. The nation has two parties. One is a church run social platform and the other is secular. The Breitbart Christian Dominionists and the McCain evangelicals are all being funded by the same Bob Mercer style groups. Religious vs Secular are the two choices and a plurality wins. That's the truth.", ">>{rollerhen} : They are coming together because it's Dem vs Repub is secular vs Christian. Otherwise they splinter and lose.", ">>{rollerhen} : Yeah, if he could be strategic that would be great. Like colleges, etc. you're right.", '>>{Baltorussian} : I live in a district that had a Republican take Kirks seat, then the Dem won, then Dold took it back, and now the Dem is running again. His ads have a picture with Obama. On Youtube yesterday I saw an ad where Obama recorded an ad for him.', ">>{scram_jones} : Also with (hopefully) Hillary's new SCOTUS pick and a full court that leans left.", ">>{beer_down} : Who is this Bush person you're talking about? Never heard of him. -Pretty much every Republican", '>>{imnotoriginal12345} : I have a feeling Dems will push marijuana legalization during those midterms to increase voter turn out.', ">>{chinamanbilly} : He's got to quit smoking, eat like Michelle tells him to, and exercise like a motherfucker because I want him to be around forever. Michelle's going to live to 150 so we don't have to worry about her.", '>>{NashMcCabe} : Bush was president when the economic collapse happened. He HAD to keep his mouth shut.', ">>{kiramis} : Interesting, wonder why he didn't do this in previous elections?", ">>{NashMcCabe} : Lots of misconceptions about Bill Clinton there. All the scandals never stuck with the public. In fact, his highest approval rating was right after his impeachment. The country was sick of hearing about it. People didn't like that he lied, but they also didn't think the President getting a blowjob was a matter of national importance. When Bill left office, he had even higher net approval than Obama now. And he didn't fade at all. He started the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative.", '>>{LATABOM} : How many Dems are "openly against" those policies? Maybe you can cite 2 or 3 other than Bernie Sanders? Find me the dems not named Hillary (who has been flipflopping to get elected for about 12 years now) or Bernie who have guaranteed they\'ll stop arming Saudi Arabia and/or Israel, who guarantee they\'ll support no-fee state college, or who want stricter regulation of healthcare providers and insurers to keep Obamacare affordable and on track? Which democratic candidates are calling for a Snowden pardon and/or legislated protection for whistleblowers? The truth is that choosing between Republicans and Democrats is very similar to the choice between Pepsi and Coke. Yes, the advertising campaigns are different and people get quite polarized and aggressively assert how different they are and that the one that isn\'t their favorite is terrible, but really it\'s just one product. Are the following "Republican" or "Democratic" policies and actions? Obama (and Hillary) and President: * pushed heavily for the TPP * overseen unprecedented arms deals to Saudi Arabia * given pretty much unconditional support to Israel, with no penalties even for the illegal settlements in Gaza * broadened the scope of trade with China despite illegal currency manipulation, theft of intellectual properties and various human rights abuses * cracked down heavily on whistleblowers both in the public and private sectors * overseen a huge increase in fracking and deregulated offshore oil drilling while promoting more and more pipeline projects, including in the arctic * carried out an unprecedented number of extrajudicial assassinations against "suspected militants) in foreign countries without their governments\' permission and without any respect for international law, most of the time resulting in multiple civilian casualties for each "intended target". Any military-aged males killed in these strikes are officially tallied as "Combatants" by the administration. * didn\'t push for real banking regulation. Didn\'t break up or nationalize any of the banking sector, or even enact punitive measures against banks or their CEOs in the event of a repeat of 2008. * based ObamaCare on the Heritage Foundation (a rightwing thinktank)\'s alternative to single-payer, which was originally pushed by Richard Nixon and supported by the "Right Wing" for decades thereafter, right up until *Bob Dole* championed basically the same system in the 90s. * allowed only 18% of GW Bush era tax cuts (mainly to the rich) expire, while extending or making permanent 82% of them Bill Clinton as President: * implemented NAFTA, which basically killed American manufacturing and decimated middle- and low-income families in America, with almost all financial benefits going to corporations and the rich. * implemented "Don\'t Ask, Don\'t Tell", which banned openly LGBT people from serving in the Armed Forces * implemented the "Defense of Marriage Act", which specifically prohibited the federal gov\'t from recognizing same-sex marriage * implemented the "Religious Freedom Restoration Act" which allowed businesses to discriminate against women, gays and other religions * gutted the American Welfare system (Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996: look it up, it\'s scary) * responsible for the 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill, which was a heavily systematized push to militarize the police, privatize the prison system, create mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses, and resulted in longer and more frequent incarceration periods, predominantly among minority groups, surprise surprise. The fact of the matter is that Obama and the Clintons being called "progressive" or "left-wing" is nothing but a win for corporate America and "The Right", because it makes the general voting public believe that they really do have a choice and that they can vote for "something different" every 4 years, which is a farce.', ">>{blkdnmt} : They're desperate to win back Congress to keep Hillary from being impeached.", ">>{stevealive} : Thanks for raising this point, I never thought about how rare Obama inls in this aspect. Let's go further back! Johnson left unpopular due to the Vietnam War and died soon after, JFK of course didn't have a post-presidency, Eisenhower mostly retired and died in 69 at age 78, Truman went back home practically broke, and Roosevelt couldn't stay alive long enough to finish a painting. It isn't until Herbert Hoover do you get a significant, longer post-presidency.", '>>{not_that_joe} : The Justice League. I hope they are all uniting like this. I love it.', '>>{SultanObama} : The democrats are to blame for entering Iraq The democrats are to blame for leaving Iraq. Riiiiiight', ">>{puroloco} : Don't think so, democrats do it too. Why the fuck are we spending so much money on election. Because money makes sure your voice/interests are heard. There should limits on how much each candidate can raise. If you exceed the limit, then then part money gets divided by the other candidates. Something like a luxury tax", '>>{Ghosttwo} : I was referencing [this](http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670), but yes.', ">>{ripsa} : Yup supporting an adulterer on his 3rd marriage who doesn't seem to be a practising Christian and appears to have a history of sexual misconduct and abuse. That's very Christian of the Republicans.", ">>{rollerhen} : SCOTUS, AG, lower justices, and veto power...that's all that matters."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Shitposter123456789} : On the airwaves, Obama is stepping up for down-ballot Democrats like never before', ">>{darwinn69} : The kids are grown and almost out of the house. I think he's going to be ramping up his community organizing skills the next few years and help Dems retake the house.", '>>{jwall7} : Maybe he should do his job and stop trying to sway the election', ">>{UvonTheDeplorable} : Hold the House. We're taking it this year, you gotta believe.", '>>{F22Rapture} : It\'s going to be damn difficult to hold the Senate in 2018 given the makeup of that "class" of senators', ">>{UvonTheDeplorable} : Dem Senators in most of those red states have been there forever. And I honestly don't expect to see coherent conservative resistance from the then-defunct GOP.", ">>{allisslothed} : >It's rigged.. it's all rigged! How dare the president not want all of his work from the past 8 years reversed/attacked by his political opponents once he's gone. I'd say he **IS** doing his job. It's not like Congress will be giving him any bills to sign, or appointing his judges. Might as well fight so his predecessor has it easier.", ">>{j0phus} : Who wants to bet that he doesn't show up to help Zephyr in he high-profile and super tight race?", '>>{MrMesister} : Except when Bernie Sanders runs for reelection in 2018. Better believe the Bern will berninate.', ">>{SpookyKid94} : That's what people keep forgetting. If Bannon gets his way, the GOP will splinter between Romney/McCaine Republicans, conservatives, and Trumpies. This will kill election efforts across the board... unless we see the same thing as a reaction in the Democratic party. Most real liberals are sick of the party's garbage. Edit: Most real liberals = all the cali socialist millenials I know. Generalizations are a mistake.", '>>{Karrionhardt} : Getting a really strong "The shields are down! Attack the Trump Star\'s main reactor!" vibe from the news today.', ">>{moxy801} : Strange he wasn't more active in doing that when it would have done his own presidency some good.", ">>{WiEaglesFi} : No, no. Corporate Democrats are real Democrats. Actual liberals need to shut up and fall in line. The DNC needs to spend money to get Dems elected...just not the kind of Dems that want the party to live up to its ideals. Zephyr's views on making life better for Americans and not letting corporate oligarchs break the law with impunity are crazy and unAmerican. How could Obama support someone like that?", '>>{engchlbw704} : Many "real" liberals are salivating at undoing Reagan\'s damage, not holding out for some utopian candidate, and happy that for the first time in two generations the country is accelerating back to being center left under "the party\'s garbage." You were probably lauded for promoting marriage equality, many of us remember being jeered, insulted, and dismissed for supporting it.', ">>{WiEaglesFi} : His job is to sit down and shut up. Oh, there's a vacancy on the Supreme Court? Get fucked loser! You want to help Americans live better lives? Not on our watch! You got Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions without a war? What a pussy! He needs to do his job and sit on his ass while a historically obstructionist congress tries to keep him from fixing out country's problems.", ">>{WiEaglesFi} : > many of us remember being jeered, insulted, and dismissed for supporting it. That's one of the biggest reasons I supported Bernie over Hillary. He took the right, and politically difficult path while she took the politically expedient choice and decided to agree that homosexuals deserve equal rights when the polls changed.", '>>{SpookyKid94} : But this is still the party that supports bombing the shit out if everyone and violating the privacy of all Americans. Liberals spent 8 years fighting the Bush administration for wiretapping and their foreign policy just to watch their party increase both of those tenfold. I get you, cooperation is important, but both party establishments support the same bullshit policies.', ">>{engchlbw704} : It takes both to win the ideological battle. Being pro marriage equality meant losing your election in most states in the 90's. If everyone did what Bernie did, the GOP would have passed a constitutuonal amendment banning gay marriage. That means no marriage equality today. You need to have a public and private policy so that you can keep the other side out of power long enough to convince the public why your private side is right.", '>>{engchlbw704} : And what party do you think is more likely to end warrentless wiretapping or bombing? The Democrats have a plurality of their party against this, while the majority of Republicans supported it pre-Trump. You do realize how ridiculous it is to state Obama bombed more, much less ten times more, than we did during the actual Iraq War, right?', '>>{WiEaglesFi} : Hey, based on your screenname, you\'re 22ish. That\'s a very astute observation for someone who hasn\'t seen very many elections take place. What you\'re seeing is that everyone in power wants things to stay the same. Forget party for a minute and look at the behavior of rich, powerful people. They want things to stay the way they are. That\'s why Hillary gets such favorable coverage by the media and people in charge. She\'s the embodiment of the status quo. When Mit Romeny, George Bush Sr., and Henry Kissinger all support the "Democrat" you really need to evaluate what the fuck is going on. What you\'re seeing is that status quo bias among people doing well in the status quo has the most explanatory power when looking at politics. It has way more predictive value than political party. As an old head, it makes me happy to see younger people who see through the bullshit they\'re fed.', ">>{Roric} : It's not uncommon for lame duck presidents to campaign for the next. Ronald Reagan did it for George H.W. Al Gore and John McCain both did not want Bill Clinton and George W. to campaign for them, due do their perceived weaknesses. Before Reagan you have to go back some ways when it was relevant -- Eisenhower gave late support to Nixon in 1960 when it looked like Nixon needed it.", ">>{SpookyKid94} : Spying increased tenfold. Bombing was absurdly high considering he pulled out of Iraq and reduced troop numbers in Afghanistan. 9/10 people killed in drone strikes aren't the intended target. I generally view Obama as a good president and obviously the democratic party is more sane than the GOP. My problem is that liberals are a voting block that gets dicked over pretty hard when it comes to anything but social issues. If they had the opportunity to win elections as liberals instead of Democrats in service to the party, why wouldn't they do that? Edit: obviously obviously", '>>{dodoconundrum} : Dude, Bernie came out fully for gay marriage in 2009 - for years before Hillary did. They were both the same age when they respectively did it (he being 4-5 years older than her). As late as 2006, he was saying he was pro civil union but not gay marriage - the same stance as Hillary and most elected democrats.', '>>{weblowinherseys} : I have a feeling that Dems are going to be overwhelmingly strong around 2024-2032. Obama is going to be as influential as the Clintons have been to the strength of the party by the time he hangs his hat up. After 2032 or maybe even before then the GOP will have no choice but to move left, but until their hardcore base dies out they are truly fucked. I mean they also have a vice grip on the majority of state governments, but hey let this democrat dream.', '>>{the2belo} : Oh yeah, Obama Calrissian leading the way. "Bernie! Michelle! All fighters follow me! Hahahahaha I told you they\'d do it!"', ">>{Obvious_Moose} : He's got a really good shot at success with this I'd say. The man has charisma that many politicians lack and if anyone can inspire young people or any disenfranchised voters to get out and vote it's him and Bernie", ">>{threemileallan} : God I hope you're right. Honestlu, Romney should work with Obama to redraw all the gerrymandered districts. Because those lines let the Republicans be held hostage to tje most extreme wings of their party.", '>>{threemileallan} : Not even a star wars geek but that made me laugh', '>>{Valarauth} : Congress will block anything else he tries to do. Solution? Spend the time getting a new Congress.', ">>{ph33randloathing} : I image he rather enjoys knocking down all of the obstructing reps who, in his eyes, hamstrung his administration. I can't say I blame him.", ">>{GeorgeXKennan} : That's the exact game plan he's already announced. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/obama-holder-redistricting-gerrymandering-229868", '>>{laxamericana} : How quickly things change. Remember how the Democratic Senate candidate in 2014 who refused to state whether she voted for Obama?', '>>{puroloco} : Nah, he thought he could do it all himself', ">>{ripsa} : When Bannon gets his way. I can't see the GOP uniting when a least two of its factions and their media organisations are actively competing against each other. I.e. Romney/McCain Republicans & Fox News vs Alt-right Trumpers & Breitbart/Infowars/Trump TV. The question is will the Social Conservatives/Evangelicals follow their own leader (Cruz or Pence maybe) making it a 3 way fight or will they ultimately back one of the above two factions?", ">>{T1mac} : These pillars of integrity will stand up for what's right especially when the opinion polls show his approval rating hits the highest point in his presidency at 55%.", ">>{T1mac} : It's clear that if it were 30 to 40 years ago, Obama would be a Republican. He and Hillary are clearly centrist, and there's no doubt that irritates Progressives. But you have to look at where we are as a country. The Republicans have jerked the politics so far right that they make Hillary look like a raging liberal. Just remember, to go left, you have to get to the center first.", '>>{Furoan} : ...does that make Bill Han Solo? ...or possibly Leia Organa. The Trumpsters have them at microphone point, and then Bill moves his arm and reveals a VHS tape...', '>>{Krilion} : Because it turns out the beat revenge is a pasta salad.', '>>{Scaryclouds} : Bush was extremely unpopular by the end of his term in office, with good reason, it was far less that he had any sort of personal/political disagreements with McCain and more neither McCain and the RNC wanted him out there stumping for McCain/the party.', ">>{redcoinman} : Almost as if she's busy doing something else lately...", '>>{TheManWhoWasNotShort} : With how young Obama is, and how beloved he is, it will be really interesting to watch his post-presidency.', ">>{LATABOM} : I wonder if he realizes that a Dem supermajority is just going to make it easier for Hillary to pass TPP, increase military and financial support for the House of Saud and Israel, go hard after whistleblowers and increase the NSA's scope and abilities, go back on promises for free state college tuition, further deregulate and/or turn a blind eye to Wall Street, and pretend there's nothing she can do about Obamacare crumbling?", ">>{nosayso} : Hopefully 2 years from now we'll be doing the same. Off-presidential cycle Democratic races have been a fucking catastrophe and mostly consisted of throwing Obama under the bus. Maybe Obama should be the new DNC chair?", '>>{frontierparty} : Straight ticket Dem is the only way for progressives to vote right now and for the next 3 or 4 years if they want to see the kind of change that progressives actually want to see.', '>>{Shitposter123456789} : You realize all those things are more likely under a Republican Senate, right? The left is far more likely to reject those policies than a Republican congress.', ">>{nosayso} : That was truly an embarrassment, Democrats would be so much stronger as a party if they'd grow a fucking spine once in a while.", '>>{frontierparty} : We can have it this year if all eligible Millenials vote.', ">>{frontierparty} : We have all been expecting the GOPs hardcore base to die out but a lot of their base is in their 30-50s. I mean that is where a lot of the Tea Party is demographically. Millenials and the younger gerneration are overwhelmingly progressive but if they don't show up to vote, nothing will change and nothing will stick. The silver lining is that Millenials are getting older and with age comes more investment in politics and commitment to voting.", ">>{Kriieod} : That's a hell of a compliment, and well deserved.", ">>{zbaile1074} : I hope you're right. Here in Missouri the only reason Claire McCaskill won her senate seat again was Todd Akin's 'legitimate rape' gaffe, I'm not hopeful for her 2018 chances unless the republicans run another total moron.", ">>{zbaile1074} : > He took the right, and politically difficult path sure if you mean that claiming gay marriage is a 'states rights' issue and not saying anything about how gay marriage should be legal everywhere in the nineties is the right path", ">>{Barron_Cyber} : I wonder if part of this is because dws is out of the dnc now. I remember in 2011 he couldn't get anyone to a pear with him. The party as a whole was running from him. Now they are running towards him", '>>{zbaile1074} : does that mean chelsea is going to kill bill when she becomes sith?', '>>{Tobias_Z} : The DNC really needs to start focusing on their ground game in the mid-terms. Democrats get slaughtered by the GOP in off presidential years because the DNC does not help. They really need to mobilize in order to keep power. It starts at the state legislature and makes its way up to congress.', ">>{LATABOM} : No, I realize that those things are more likely with a democratic supermajority than slim majority. 2 or 3 democrats who don't support those things make less of a difference in a Dem supermajority than in a 50/50 or 52/48 split. There are realistically only a handful of Dems who won't go along with the things I listed (and some of that handful can easily be coerced by the DNC and/or Hillary machine), and if Dems control 60-65% of the house and senate, those Dems can and will effectively be ignored and/or only paid lip service by a Clinton administration. Hillary has only flip-flopped on TPP and taxpayer-funded state college in an effort to win the election and will flop back again once her power is secured. In terms of Israel/Saud support, prison for whistleblowers, deregulation of wallstreet and a healthcare solution that protects Big Pharma and the Healthcare Industry's profits, you just have to look at what Hillary and Bill have supported over the past 30 years of their political careers to predict what they'll do when they're back in power.", ">>{Barron_Cyber} : That would've been the perfect thing they needed with Sarah Palin.", '>>{Tobias_Z} : > When Mit Romeny, George Bush Sr., and Henry Kissinger all support the "Democrat" you really need to evaluate what the fuck is going on. It\'s simple, Donald Trump is terrifying to literally everyone. How hard is that to see?', '>>{Tobias_Z} : Bush was toxic. McCain had to distance himself from Bush.', '>>{John-Carlton-King} : Unless he uses his bully pulpit to make it bigger.', ">>{Mike_Kermin} : ... Yes. You do need a public and private policy. But there's a leap between that and praising someone for sitting on the sidelines while something bad is happening.", '>>{foamyhomey} : The worked in the general election. Midterms are different. The millennial turnout in 2014 where I live in CA was like 16%', '>>{NewClayburn} : One year I wish the Democrats would just throw the presidential election to focus on congress instead.', ">>{SSHeretic} : It really is an interesting and unique situation in modern politics. If we go back to the 70's, Nixon resigned in disgrace, Ford left in defeat having never won a Presidential election, Carter left in a crushing defeat after one term, Reagan left just shy of 78 years old and suffering from dementia, H. W. Bush left as an unpopular one term president with approval ratings around 30%, Clinton left as amid a number of scandals, and W. Bush left with record low approval ratings around 20%. Obama will leave as a young, healthy, scandal free, popular President who remains an extremely compelling public speaker. Where Reagan had to fade into the background because of his health and Clinton needed to fade into the background because of his philandering, Obama has every reason and ability to stay in the spotlight and continue to have influence in politics and policy. It certainly looks like he's poised be a valuable asset for the Democratic Party (and liberal causes in general) for decades.", '>>{Thethirdtoken} : Old people vote in midterms, intelligence skipped a generation.', ">>{Shitposter123456789} : So you think those openly in favor of those policies (most of the GOP) would be less likely to reject that those those openly against those policies (most of the Dems)? I get that you may not trust the Dems to stick to their word, but I don't understand that logic.", ">>{rollerhen} : He's not moderate enough to help, he would actually hurt in many areas. And he's not popular with minority voters.", '>>{rollerhen} : Do you mean to say it skipped the millennial generation?', '>>{Baseproduct} : He doesn\'t really have to go out and talk about issues, though. He can just show up to a rally, say "Senator X has been a fantastic partner in our revolution," and peace out. Merely showing up to a rally will drive turnout with younger Democrats, because he\'s wildly popular with them.', ">>{rollerhen} : Here are the facts. The nation has two parties. One is a church run social platform and the other is secular. The Breitbart Christian Dominionists and the McCain evangelicals are all being funded by the same Bob Mercer style groups. Religious vs Secular are the two choices and a plurality wins. That's the truth.", ">>{rollerhen} : They are coming together because it's Dem vs Repub is secular vs Christian. Otherwise they splinter and lose.", ">>{rollerhen} : Yeah, if he could be strategic that would be great. Like colleges, etc. you're right.", '>>{Baltorussian} : I live in a district that had a Republican take Kirks seat, then the Dem won, then Dold took it back, and now the Dem is running again. His ads have a picture with Obama. On Youtube yesterday I saw an ad where Obama recorded an ad for him.', ">>{scram_jones} : Also with (hopefully) Hillary's new SCOTUS pick and a full court that leans left.", ">>{beer_down} : Who is this Bush person you're talking about? Never heard of him. -Pretty much every Republican", '>>{imnotoriginal12345} : I have a feeling Dems will push marijuana legalization during those midterms to increase voter turn out.', ">>{chinamanbilly} : He's got to quit smoking, eat like Michelle tells him to, and exercise like a motherfucker because I want him to be around forever. Michelle's going to live to 150 so we don't have to worry about her.", '>>{NashMcCabe} : Bush was president when the economic collapse happened. He HAD to keep his mouth shut.', ">>{kiramis} : Interesting, wonder why he didn't do this in previous elections?", ">>{NashMcCabe} : Lots of misconceptions about Bill Clinton there. All the scandals never stuck with the public. In fact, his highest approval rating was right after his impeachment. The country was sick of hearing about it. People didn't like that he lied, but they also didn't think the President getting a blowjob was a matter of national importance. When Bill left office, he had even higher net approval than Obama now. And he didn't fade at all. He started the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative.", '>>{LATABOM} : How many Dems are "openly against" those policies? Maybe you can cite 2 or 3 other than Bernie Sanders? Find me the dems not named Hillary (who has been flipflopping to get elected for about 12 years now) or Bernie who have guaranteed they\'ll stop arming Saudi Arabia and/or Israel, who guarantee they\'ll support no-fee state college, or who want stricter regulation of healthcare providers and insurers to keep Obamacare affordable and on track? Which democratic candidates are calling for a Snowden pardon and/or legislated protection for whistleblowers? The truth is that choosing between Republicans and Democrats is very similar to the choice between Pepsi and Coke. Yes, the advertising campaigns are different and people get quite polarized and aggressively assert how different they are and that the one that isn\'t their favorite is terrible, but really it\'s just one product. Are the following "Republican" or "Democratic" policies and actions? Obama (and Hillary) and President: * pushed heavily for the TPP * overseen unprecedented arms deals to Saudi Arabia * given pretty much unconditional support to Israel, with no penalties even for the illegal settlements in Gaza * broadened the scope of trade with China despite illegal currency manipulation, theft of intellectual properties and various human rights abuses * cracked down heavily on whistleblowers both in the public and private sectors * overseen a huge increase in fracking and deregulated offshore oil drilling while promoting more and more pipeline projects, including in the arctic * carried out an unprecedented number of extrajudicial assassinations against "suspected militants) in foreign countries without their governments\' permission and without any respect for international law, most of the time resulting in multiple civilian casualties for each "intended target". Any military-aged males killed in these strikes are officially tallied as "Combatants" by the administration. * didn\'t push for real banking regulation. Didn\'t break up or nationalize any of the banking sector, or even enact punitive measures against banks or their CEOs in the event of a repeat of 2008. * based ObamaCare on the Heritage Foundation (a rightwing thinktank)\'s alternative to single-payer, which was originally pushed by Richard Nixon and supported by the "Right Wing" for decades thereafter, right up until *Bob Dole* championed basically the same system in the 90s. * allowed only 18% of GW Bush era tax cuts (mainly to the rich) expire, while extending or making permanent 82% of them Bill Clinton as President: * implemented NAFTA, which basically killed American manufacturing and decimated middle- and low-income families in America, with almost all financial benefits going to corporations and the rich. * implemented "Don\'t Ask, Don\'t Tell", which banned openly LGBT people from serving in the Armed Forces * implemented the "Defense of Marriage Act", which specifically prohibited the federal gov\'t from recognizing same-sex marriage * implemented the "Religious Freedom Restoration Act" which allowed businesses to discriminate against women, gays and other religions * gutted the American Welfare system (Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996: look it up, it\'s scary) * responsible for the 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill, which was a heavily systematized push to militarize the police, privatize the prison system, create mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses, and resulted in longer and more frequent incarceration periods, predominantly among minority groups, surprise surprise. The fact of the matter is that Obama and the Clintons being called "progressive" or "left-wing" is nothing but a win for corporate America and "The Right", because it makes the general voting public believe that they really do have a choice and that they can vote for "something different" every 4 years, which is a farce.', ">>{blkdnmt} : They're desperate to win back Congress to keep Hillary from being impeached.", ">>{stevealive} : Thanks for raising this point, I never thought about how rare Obama inls in this aspect. Let's go further back! Johnson left unpopular due to the Vietnam War and died soon after, JFK of course didn't have a post-presidency, Eisenhower mostly retired and died in 69 at age 78, Truman went back home practically broke, and Roosevelt couldn't stay alive long enough to finish a painting. It isn't until Herbert Hoover do you get a significant, longer post-presidency.", '>>{not_that_joe} : The Justice League. I hope they are all uniting like this. I love it.', '>>{SultanObama} : The democrats are to blame for entering Iraq The democrats are to blame for leaving Iraq. Riiiiiight', ">>{puroloco} : Don't think so, democrats do it too. Why the fuck are we spending so much money on election. Because money makes sure your voice/interests are heard. There should limits on how much each candidate can raise. If you exceed the limit, then then part money gets divided by the other candidates. Something like a luxury tax", '>>{Ghosttwo} : I was referencing [this](http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670), but yes.', ">>{ripsa} : Yup supporting an adulterer on his 3rd marriage who doesn't seem to be a practising Christian and appears to have a history of sexual misconduct and abuse. That's very Christian of the Republicans.", ">>{rollerhen} : SCOTUS, AG, lower justices, and veto power...that's all that matters."]]

classify and reply

[">>{scite} : Republican Ohio Gov. John Kasich joined the attack against Trump's criticism of the parents of a Muslim soldier who died in Iraq, tweeting out that the parents of those killed in action must always be treated with respect", ">>{ailboles} : >However, the administration official said Trump is less likely to pay the caucus much heed going forward. If he's going to try ignoring the freedom caucus, and they vote against him every time because of that, does it mean that effectively the republicans no longer have a majority in the house?", '>>{anthroengineer} : Greens sue Obama to stop fossil fuel production on federal land', ">>{Lochmon} : Trump doesn't learn lessons, gave it up years ago.", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : You gotta love environmentalists... they're all for shutting down energy production but unwilling to give up one iota of energy consumption. Go Hypocrisy!!!", '>>{Die-Bold} : I look forward to and do not doubt *for a second* a new age of nuanced Trump. Oh, he already fucked it up in this very article.', ">>{Yuyumon} : Mattis is reportedly 'not happy' the White House is blocking his choice for a key staff position", '>>{ishabad} : The world is going to run out of popcorn at this rate', ">>{RamblingMutt} : Trump didn't learn shit. It was the Democrat's fault! No, no, Trump set it up so that Ryan would lose! That's it. It's Ryan's Fault! No, for real this time, its a 4d chess move to force people to stop looking into Russia! It's never Trump's fault, so he can never learn from his mistakes.", ">>{aritworld1} : If Obama were actually a progressive he wouldn't be getting sued by real progressive groups. He is a sellout and so is Hillary Clinton. We desperately need additional political parties in this country that are actually mature enough, and ethical enough to run our nation properly.", ">>{ianrl337} : I'm pretty sure Mattis is just Chuck Norris with his beard jackhammered off.", ">>{blackontheinternets} : I wonder how much they are leasing the land for? I remember a few years back, it was $1.50 an acre. Seems like they should be sue them in order to get them to raise the prices or something useful. Or just don't, whatever.", '>>{WinkleCream} : The real problem with these deals is they are selling them for dirt cheap.', ">>{ailboles} : No. Make Mattis happy. He's about the only competent person in the White House now. Make him happy.", '>>{Seinfeldologist} : He won\'t last a year in this administration. I give it three months, tops, before he pulls the ol\' "I need to spend more time with my family."', ">>{dyzo-blue} : But Trump's racist supporters hate Muslims and immigrants more than they love patriots.", '>>{WinkleCream} : Bingo. Bill Clinton was sued by progressive groups including unions when he was president. Hillary Clinton is going to get it from the left and right.', '>>{anon902503} : Or Johnson. Either way would be enough for Clinton to cruise to a win in OH.', '>>{altheist} : How Republicans Could Replace Trump Even if He Stays In', '>>{CannabinoidAndroid} : > It\'s never Trump\'s fault, so he can never learn from his mistakes. *And when they\'ve given you their all* *Some stagger and fall, afterall it\'s not easy.* *Banging your heart against* *some mad bugger\'s wall."*', '>>{buzzit292} : How did you arrive at this conclusion? The environmentalists I know are all for conservation, riding bikes, walking or using smaller cars, for example?', ">>{altheist} : Proof Mitt Romney can take office and strip our constitutional rights away: [politico](http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/how-republicans-could-replace-trump-even-if-he-stays-in-214336) Proof he's strips away human rights: [His Agenda](http://www.thelibertyconservative.com/libertarian-party-goes-gestapo-supports-mass-surveillance-federal-snitching/) [His Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney) Keep Trump because he's a fresh start and clearly listening to the public, otherwise his message and plans wouldn't have shifted so vastly. He's a populist.", '>>{ConsonantlyDrunk} : An alpha male never backs down, no matter what. Politics by domination.', ">>{ailboles} : oh god don't say that. If mattis leaves the world is FUCKED.", '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : You think of effective environmentalism as those acts adopted by individuals but in fact those acts are meaningless. The vast overwhelming impact of humanity isn\'t in driving a Prius, but in manufacturing a Prius. In mining. In smelting. In manufacturing. The toxic residue of batteries. The pollution extruded by the power plant to charge it. You can extrapolate these disparate costs to all aspects of our first world existence down to your computer(s), your phone, watch, activity tracker, refrigerator, sheets, pants, television, etc etc etc. Do you have Clue One what it takes to stock your local grocery store so that one can exist on a Vegan diet? Because the pollution inherent in manufacturing and energy production occurs far far away from most consumers we are largely blissfully ignorant of these realities or at least don\'t truly have our nose rubbed in them. But it is quite impossible to enact meaningful change because to do so would entail massive death and suffering. There is no way for the 1st world to be sustainable without returning to the Dark Ages. If you\'re any student of history you might have a clue what that was like. But the REAL problem isn\'t our privileged selves, it\'s the billions and billions of people who want what we have. Speaking for myself I live in a very modest apartment but I know what it took to harvest the lumber, mine the gypsum, saw the 2x4 and structural supports. Manufacture the concrete. I have constant electricity in every room, air conditioning, refrigeration, natural gas on demand. I have a 32" television, three cell phones, computers, tablets, internet. My cupboards are packed with food. I have filtered water in five gallon jugs because the kids don\'t care for the taste of the tap water (which is perfectly clean). In a global sense this kind of existence is extremely... almost unbelievably... privileged. Because we\'re surrounded by extreme wealth and privilege we don\'t see it the same way as someone in the slums of Mumbai may see it. But they want it. Everyone wants it.', ">>{Solterlun} : Shhh don't give it away let him do it.", ">>{altheist} : I'm having to do it because you guys keep deleting my posts.", ">>{buzzit292} : I don't think all that you attribute to me. I understand your argument and I think we need national policy to achieve changes in line with the scale of problem. I wouldn't say we have to get to return to the dark ages even if resources become more evenly distributed. I am seeing a pattern in that you project beliefs onto people! You originally said environmentalists weren't willing to cut one iota of energy consumption, when in fact many clearly are. I know many who go with out cars altogether, become vegetarian. Having fewer children, for whatever reason, is the norm. Energy efficiency of all the devices you mention has increased, and electric power consumption per capita in the us hasn't been increasing since 2000. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PC?locations=US", '>>{lolator123} : You cant be racist against a muslim or an immigrant because neither of them are races', '>>{walter_neft} : Nah, that would torpedo any political ambitions he has as a republican. He\'ll use the bogus "vote your conscience" line so people could assume he voted Johnson or write-in while actually voting Clinton.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : You are correct when you say that I project beliefs onto people; the medium demands it. You know (or you know that I claimed) to be a parent, and you may presume that I'm male (as I am). But even if there were a 'national policy' to achieve changes 'inline with the scale of the problem' that would only impact and arguably cripple the economy of 4.5% of the global population. No, the sad reality is... and I understand you wishing to reject this... that we are going to continue to go on our merry way until things go 'BOOM' of their own inertia. Don't worry. It shouldn't be much longer.", ">>{newsified} : No he didn't. He already knew how to throw his allies under the bus.", ">>{moxy801} : For a long time I've thought there was a factional war going on in the GOP between a Bush/Koch Brothers and Trump faction, but now I'm not so sure if the Kochs have not been working with Trump for awhile now. If this is so, I doubt the Bush faction has much clout anymore. I would also guess some of the Bush people will migrate to Trump now.", ">>{dyzo-blue} : **Race isn't a real thing.** Racism, however, is. And it includes bigotry against people based on their ethnic or religious background, melanin levels, ancestry, nation of origin, nose shape, accent, etc.", '>>{TRUMP_MAGA_} : Why? Hillary voted for the war that got this guys son killed. He focused his anger against the wrong person.', '>>{NoTaxesTrump} : Shut up Mattis, President Bannon will call the shots.', '>>{PaulsRedditUsername} : >"He didn\'t care or particularly know about health care," a key GOP congressional aide said about Trump >"I got the sense that he had delegated a lot of the specifics...and he was going to support whatever they came up with regardless of good or bad, as long as it was some kind of repeal and replacement," This is what you get with a president who has no real morals or political beliefs. What motivates Trump is getting what Trump wants. There\'s no overarching philosophy. He has enemies and people he hates (like Obama) so he tries to screw them over, but mostly he just wants things and does whatever it takes to get them without considering long-term effects, or even immediate effects. He just wants.', ">>{Seinfeldologist} : Don't even worry about it. Trumps got the best defense. Bigly. Mattis is low energy. Sad.", ">>{HolyRomanPrince} : With the Paul Ryan drive by he pulled today I'm skeptical of this. Looks like they'll unify to get him out of power", '>>{altheist} : Even democrats need to stop protesting, we need to do everything we can to prevent mass surveillance from taking over - bitching about Trump will make it more likely to happen.', ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : For fucks sake, anybody who uses this shitty-ass argument basically proves that they're either too young to vote or they're just barely 18-19. EVERYONE WAS FOR THE WAR AFTER 9/11! 80% OF ALL AMERICANS WANTED IT! IF YOU WERE EVEN ALIVE BACK THEN, YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR IT!", '>>{BED_WETTER_BY_PROXY} : The most sane man in the Whitehouse is nicknamed "mad dog"', ">>{Cashavelli} : Yeah... pretty sure Mattis is the only reason we're not already at war with Iran.", '>>{moxy801} : > we need to do everything we can to prevent mass surveillance from taking over So what do you suggest be done given the current situation?', ">>{Joshsports60} : A key part about passing legislation is about knowing what's in the FUCKING BILL!!! I bet you someone watching a 2 minute nightly news segment would be able to better explain this bill to Congress than Trump.", '>>{PutinPuppetTrump} : >**"He didn\'t care or particularly know about health care," a key GOP congressional aide said about Trump following the stunning defeat of the Republican health care plan Friday.** >"If you are going to be a great negotiator, you have to know about the subject matter," the aide said, **adding that overhauling health care is far different from building a golf course.** >At one meeting Trump held with members of the "Tuesday Group," an informal caucus of moderate Republicans, the lawmakers went around the room and answered where they stood on the bill. **When Pennsylvania\'s Charlie Dent said he was a "no," Trump replied, "Why am I even talking to you?"** >**"I don\'t give a shit what you guys think," Bannon exclaimed** at a Thursday night meeting with the caucus, a source familiar with the meeting said. The sense in the room was Bannon lost his cool. >Two sources in the Freedom Caucus meeting in the White House Cabinet Room on Thursday **confirmed that the President, when pressed about some of their policy concerns with the bill, said, "Forget about the little shit."** lol. What a fucking shit show President Puppet is. Also, the FBI is coming for you Comrade Donnie.', ">>{canopoly} : Honestly, I'm surprised he hasn't at this point. He kind of already has de facto.", '>>{SteveBannonEXPOSED} : Mattis and Kelly will not accept Trump\'s Bs for long. Pentagon already came out with a statement blaming Russia for Ukraine violence after Trump said "We don\'t know"', '>>{ophelia_jones} : Uhh... I mean, no, the Freedom Caucus are a failing caucus who vote illegally. Steve Bannon is a tremendous negotiator who makes good deals. >.>', '>>{watthefucksalommy} : Being fair, all Presidents do things to get what they want. It just so happens that most of the time, those Presidents want what they think is best for the American people. Trump, on the other hand, wants an entirely different category of thing than we\'ve seen in a while. He wants victory and adulation. And he wants to tear down people he perceives (but would never openly acknowledge) as being better than him. To this end, any policies and rhetoric that he creates have more than a tinge of spite and maliciousness to them. (He\'s also grossly incompetent and rubberstamping a hodgepodge of fantasy agendas for Paul Ryan, Steve Bannon, Reince Priebus, Daddy Vlad, his own pocketbook, and others, but if we\'re focusing on his "ideology" it revolves around revenge for perceived slights and "winning" in the public eye. He didn\'t care what was in the health care bill because he\'s stupid enough to believe the people who told him ObamaCare was a disaster and anything would be better. He didn\'t know anything about health care because, let\'s face it, his Intelligence score is about a 7 and he\'s not exactly curious enough to learn anything new.) Contrast this with Obama. We learned this week that Obama was an absolute political and policy-crafting genius. ACA is virtually unassailable from the direction of the right because in order to do what one part of the right wants, you lose the other. By reluctantly attaching his name to it, he accidentally lured the right into the Repeal and Replace trap. They got super emotional about it all but never bothered to build concensus about what to do after getting rid of it. Without a viable alternative, the American people will never buy into some fly-by-the-seat-of-our-pants plan and you get 17% approval ratings. But his real genius was in the crafting of the policy. Obama had what Trump will never even think to need: empathy and the ability to listen, legislative expertise, connections across the coalition, political capital gained by national popularity, and passion for the policy change you\'re trying to enact.', '>>{ForgettableUsername} : I think Trump only picked him because of the nickname.', ">>{Franz_Kafka} : Guy was a Marine, he's dealt with worse. Not a bad way to feed your ego too, thinking of yourself as the last defense against Trump/Bannon's terrible geopolitical ideas.", '>>{DeathBeforeTrump} : So did Pence and 98% of Republicans at the time.', '>>{TRUMP_MAGA_} : Which means Hillary was wrong and has blood on her hands.', ">>{altheist} : Do exactly like Clinton said, give him a chance - Give Trump a chance because his team and his actions are speaking louder than his speeches, his simple words. What's happening in the oval office is a complete 180 from the shit he was saying to the rednecks that voted him in because he knows, and the government knows, that Americans will not tolerate that level of hatred. At least over 54% of American adults aren't bigots, which is important to remember. If he is a populist he'd be swayed by our opinion (like what he's shown in recent days), just like manufacturing companies have been.", '>>{DeathBeforeTrump} : Yes, she was. A lot of people were. Even Trump.', ">>{moxy801} : > give him a chance - Like the 'chances' he's given to so many others? This guy ran with ZERO political track record - but he's lived a long time and has done many things to demonstrate he is 100% unsuitable to be President. >If he is a populist he'd be swayed by our opinion There is no evidence over his lifetime to demonstrate this. Do a search on just how outspoken he's been on behalf of Labor unions.", '>>{Wife97} : I agree. I wish he had said something like "utmost respect" because everyone should be treated with respect. The media have created a sewer of discourse that knows no boundaries.', '>>{TRUMP_MAGA_} : Hillary voted for the war that this guys son got killed in. Fact.', ">>{altheist} : Mitt Romney is responsible for the reason why China is so oppressed today and is struggling to fight for their human rights without retaliation. He is part of an organized scheme to control our lifestyles. That is unacceptable. We deserve human rights and civil rights. Romney doesn't believe in those things at all. You don't see the big picture.", '>>{fuck_your_red_hat} : Can Mattis not be Chuck Norris? Chuck is sort of an asshole.', '>>{IamDavidBrockAMA} : Always? Forever and ever with no questions? When did we start deifying soldiers so damn much.', ">>{altheist} : Okay, Trump became president due to the electrocal college alone, on December 19 they get to choose whether or not to keep him as president. He is our last chance to avoid being controlled by mass surveillance because the backup choice IS Mitt Romney and he is directly responsible for the mass surveillance camera program in China. It's because of him that they can't even protest without getting bulldozed over - I'm not even exaggerating, you have to read and see these stories when they happen.", ">>{Ayesuku} : You're focused on the wrong problem. Who gives a shit how you describe hate when the hate exists regardless?", '>>{moxy801} : > Mitt Romney and he is directly responsible for the mass surveillance camera program in China Link?', ">>{BlabberingEndlessly} : It's funny, Trump is probably whacking loads and loads off into a silver chalice right now. The media continues to report on this stupid bullshit, makes money off of stupid people who really care and get all worked up about it. News flash: if this post angers you, you are a sad being with minor capacity for intelligence. Who. Cares. This is seriously grade A reality TV level monkey shit. Everyone's gonna say something, eventually, and *THIS* will be what starts World War 3. You think Benghazi was bad? You think the extermination of muskrats and purple badgers was a bad thing? You just wait.", ">>{scite} : It's funny, seeing rightwing Trump supporters coming out to attack veterans and soldiers.", '>>{Robotlollipops} : Can Mattis just go ahead and be the President now? He seems to know what the fuck...a lot more than anyone else, anyway.', ">>{altheist} : I already posted it in here... Here's it is: [With 3 resources for proof](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5cpk6a/how_republicans_could_replace_trump_even_if_he/d9yc41r/?context=3)", ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : The man was married to the Corps. No wives, no kids. If he leaves to spend time with anything, it'll be his books.", ">>{ianrl337} : Good point, Mattis is secretly half of Ron Swanson's mustache", ">>{IamDavidBrockAMA} : It's funny seeing the left turn into the army bootlickers this time.", ">>{moxy801} : And this is assuming that the Chinese government was not already 'mass survilleiling' its own people prior to Romney?", '>>{neweraccount123} : When they trot out their dead loved one as a weapon to attack the sacrifices others have made for their country and treat it like a currency that gives them the right to demean others with impunity, they deserve ZERO respect.', ">>{liberationation} : Racist, bigot, sexist, homophobe—doesn't matter, they are all the same problem: collectivism, misunderstanding, and prejudice.", ">>{l3ft1st} : Iran is actually the one country Mattis is actually *more* likely to lead us into war against. Search around, he's got a huge hard on for attacking Iran.", '>>{sleepingmoon} : Omg I just choked on my ice (which I have been chewing at an alarming rate, from sheer stress). Thanks for the laugh, I sure needed it today.', ">>{liberationation} : Who is deifying soldiers? These people went up on stage to point out Trump's hypocrisy, not make their son a god.", '>>{IamDavidBrockAMA} : >always be treated with respect Not even then in particular. So now they are saying that there is literally nothing a vets parents could do to lose respect? How hyperbolic', ">>{liberationation} : No one is bemoaning the war in this case though, the problem is that Trump's rhetoric implies that Muslims never do anything good for this country, and nothing could be further from the truth, symbolized by this one Muslim soldier sacrificing more than Trump ever will.", ">>{scite} : 'Army bootlicker'? Is that the mouth you kiss the ground the veterans stood on?", ">>{Honztastic} : Honestly, no they shouldnt. Being related to someone doesn't get you a magic pass for behavior. Unless you're a Clinton. Trump ia wrong in this instance, but the principle espoused by Kasich is stupid.", '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Its a way of saying his hate his okay because its not racism, which is the most well known form', ">>{OliveItMaggle} : Are you really trying to argue we shouldn't treat others with respect?", '>>{IamDavidBrockAMA} : Nobody should permanently have unconditional respect forever, no.', '>>{neptune1492} : If Gold star families wish to be free of political attacks, perhaps they should not put themselves on the DNC stage and make political attacks. Islamic jihadists killed their son, not Trump.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Yes, every person should be treated with respect.', ">>{spacehxcc} : So did virtually everybody else. You're really grasping at straws here.", '>>{kiddestructo} : Pretty much her entire adult life for PUBLIC service. You think she puts up with all this bullshit so she can see her name in lights on some building? No, she actually cares about others.', ">>{jimbo831} : It's sad to me because you're right. I would have so much respect for the man if he did that. Those are the kind of politicians we need on both sides. But I don't blame him for not doing it because it would in fact end his career. That's the sad reality of our partisanship.", '>>{TRUMP_MAGA_} : HAHAHAHAHA!!! the only person she fucking served is herself.', ">>{reality-distortion} : That isn't even remotely true. There were massive protest at the time. I'm one of the people who called Hillary Clinton's office begging for her to vote no and give the weapons inspectors time to finish the job. Polls were not overwhelmingly in favor of war, despite the media's constant push. There was very strong opposition, even within the government where there were competing bills that Clinton could have supported that would have slowed down Bush/Cheney's mad rush. It was widely known that Bush was using ginned up evidence. You want people to believe that workaholic Clinton was a clueless moron. Ha. She was a political opportunist, period.", ">>{jimbo831} : >Islamic jihadists killed their son, not Trump. It's not about who killed their son. It's about the fact that if Trump had his way their son would've never been allowed into this country and never would've been able to serve in our military and make the sacrifice he made for his fellow soldiers.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : Hmm? There were protests, 20% of 300 million people is alot of people, and they didn't want the war. I didn't deny that, but where's your source that 'polls were not overwhelmingly in favor?'", '>>{kiddestructo} : Yawn, sos, different day. Reality says otherwise.', ">>{Fronesis} : Dude has the haircut of an old lesbian. I don't get why he had it cut; it looked fine before.", ">>{ThatsOneBadMF} : So you don't agree with Kasich - that's fair. In this particular situation with the Kahn family, did they do anything to warrant a lack of respect?", ">>{Fronesis} : I was alive then. I was one of the eleven million that protested it before it even got off the ground. Don't be presumptuous about people lambasting Hillary for it. It was an unjust war of aggression and lots of right-thinking people opposed it. She could have been one of them.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : I couldn't protest since I was too young, but I know for damn sure that I would have. That said, it's hard to find any person in power at the time who was against the was, and Hillary did say she supported the war as a last resort.", ">>{Fronesis} : How does this mitigate her responsibility at all? She should be held to account for the hundreds of thousands that died as a result of her actions. Doesn't matter that she wasn't the only one undertaking the action.", ">>{Aeschylus-} : Actually Pakistani isn't a race it's a nationality. The parents are probably Punjabi, or some other North Indian ethnicity", '>>{Aeschylus-} : Easy to be wrong when your president is lying to you', ">>{Saltysweetcake} : Why didn't Republicans like Kasich? He seemed like the most reasonable choice.", '>>{jimbo831} : So? I never said it was. This comment is just a non sequitur.', ">>{Saltysweetcake} : Thank you! I lived in Manhatten during that time and even most of the New Yorkers thought the Iraq War protesters were insane. We were all mislead. We were all scared...we were almost all united as a country and the Bush admin used this to convince us and Congress to go to war with Iraq. Cheney & Friends were frothing at the mouth to attack Iraq pre 911. This wasn't at all obvious at the time. Except I'm pretty sure some higher ups knew it was really about oil. During that time even in conversation if you said we were only invading over oil you were seen as a pariah. Anyone else remember this crazy time?", '>>{-dachande-} : Punjabi is a language. And race is a social construct used throughout history to describe people of the same language, nationality, ethnicity, and lately, even religion.', '>>{BirdsInTheNest} : Deflecting seems to be the only strategy with Trump supporters.', ">>{JellyDonutJerry} : Just because he had a respectable tweet doesn't mean his run in the primaries was any good. He was awful at giving speeches and would get flustered at the tiniest things.", ">>{spacehxcc} : Should, let's say Mike Pence, also be held equally accountable seeing how he also voted for the war?", ">>{LABAW} : The american government has inertia, the Iraq war was happening regardless of 9/11 IMHO. That's why it was easy to be against. It was in the weeds before the attacks and I remember thinking at the election we had decided to go to war with Iraq, during 9/11, and up to the war. That war was such a shame...", ">>{LABAW} : They are political pawns riding the coat tails of their late son. Biden didn't do it, thank god.", '>>{2chainz3felonies} : Because they were too busy falling head over heels for racist Cheeto man.', '>>{2chainz3felonies} : Except Joe the Plummer was a fake and this is real.', ">>{2chainz3felonies} : Yeah. Not to mention that it's easy to attack a voting record when you have never held public office and therefore have never had the chance to vote.", ">>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : to prove your point: We can't hate the family of terrorists.", ">>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : Unless you're a Democrat, then you redefine the rhetoric and rationalize the events.", '>>{Saltysweetcake} : I was being sarcastic btw :) A marine dying for a heroic deed to save his fellow marines is not equal in any way to Joe the plumber.', '>>{2chainz3felonies} : Nah I got what you were saying. I was just reminding everyone that Joe was outed as a phoney', ">>{lerussianspy} : Yeah, a religion isn't a race. Religion is an ideology, not a genetic disposition. edit: to the people downvoting me thinking religion is a race you are what's wrong with this country. Regardless of your politic views you can't change definitions and you should be truthful to yourself and learn to think with logic and reason.", ">>{progress10} : No it's not. He will be back in 2020.", ">>{WhyDoges} : Don't try. I got into arguments with enough bigots. They make it an argument over semantics to cover the fact they are a large piece of shit.", ">>{WhyDoges} : Her vote didn't mean shit in the end. They were going to war with or without her.", ">>{WhyDoges} : She didn't command the war, serve on a committee for it, led troops, and regreted her decision. She voted for the war and nothing else. They got faulty intel and her vote would not have changed anything. It ends when she voted in favor.", '>>{PM_me_nachos} : You wanna get into a semantics debate? Ok. Trump is a vile bigot whose platform emphasizes on hate and bigotry and nothing but hate and bigotry. There, is that better? I didnt know being called a bigot was better than being a called a racist.', ">>{CheezStik} : Well they certainly don't like math! He had by far the best numbers against Hillary and would probably be beating her now", '>>{kajkajete} : The man ran 13 elections in his lifetime. This is the first one he loses.', '>>{kajkajete} : He hates the Clintons. Heck, when he was asked he said that there were more chances he voted for Trump than for Clinton.', '>>{CDXXRoman} : >Punjabi is a language. Yes and Japanese is a language. >Punjabi people, are an Indo-Aryan ethnic group originating from the Punjab region, found in Pakistan and northern India "Punjabi people" on @Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjabi_people?wprov=sfta1', ">>{-dachande-} : You're getting hung up on the wrong thing. The point is that hating someone because they are Pakistani is racist...regardless of whether you consider nationality to be a race", ">>{ThatsOneBadMF} : Eh, I'm not gonna name call here, I just wanted a direct answer about Kahn instead of a strawman argument.", '>>{plumb0b} : [Mother of a fallen soldier talks at RNC and the liberal pundits attack her and the RNC for "using a grieving family member for partisan gain".](https://i.reddituploads.com/5cbcb5f7f3144550a44eb3a7c51dd4d2?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=95ce93f99f7de0ac825878d29e8f68aa) Good to know the hypocrites are out in full force here. You can really see that extra $5M CTR funding at work.', '>>{uncertainpath} : Well over 50 percent of the vote as going to Cruz and Trump. They were very similar candidates in their positions. It seems like it was just due to the makeup of the electorate.', ">>{Saltysweetcake} : That's really unfortunate for them. Honestly, I wouldn't know who to choose between those two myself.", '>>{copperwatt} : Math is an establishment conspiracy. Math is also the reason Bernie "lost". COINCIDENCE??!?', ">>{Daverost} : > parents of those killed in action must always be treated with respect I agree, but when you sling shit first, you get shit slung back at you. You don't get to cry victim when you take the first shot just because your child was KIA. I mean it's terrible that it happened, but it doesn't give you free reign to just do and say whatever with no repercussion or response from those addressed. EDIT: To clarify, I mean this: > Let me ask you: have you even read the United States constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy. I mean it's clearly not patronizing at all! No, this dude took the first shot on being disrespectful to Trump. He lost his right to a respectful reply.", '>>{Fronesis} : Fuck yea he should. And Bush should have been hanged as a war criminal.', '>>{lalilulelo09} : Because a lot of them **really** hate brown people. That to them takes precedence over anything else.', ">>{lalilulelo09} : Yes, Trump throwing gasoline on a dumpster fire is Hilary's fault. Trump didn't have to engage but he did because he is an little insecure narcissist who can't keep his mouth shut.", '>>{swagcoffin} : The difference is one is running for president, and the other probably should.', ">>{WaitWhatHuhWhat} : I'm not from the US, but aren't you using examples of opinion pieces to counter a Republican criticising Trump? Sure if this was a story about a journalist making contradictory statement your picture would be relevant, but somehow falls short to what this article is actually about.", '>>{MaVagina} : Yes, everyone who voted for that war should be killed for the sake of peace.', ">>{MaVagina} : Totally. I'm the same way. Once I've made up my mind about something, i refuse to learn more about it. I mean, I'm not some lame nerd scientist or something; information just clouds my judgment.", '>>{blatherskiter} : So, if you disliked someone because they were a white member of the Aryan Nation or Nazi Party, that would be racist of you?', ">>{RooftopBBQ} : Because if republicans were reasonable they'd vote democrat. The republicans abandoned reason when they aimed their party at the religious right and later the tea party.", '>>{CapnSheff} : I don\'t know about "most always" be treated with respect because the parents might be a bag of shit compared to their hero kid, but in this case yes', '>>{liberationation} : Or maybe I was done talking to this trump supporter. It was getting boring.', '>>{nerfAvari} : now describe how Trump hates those who you claim he does', ">>{MaVagina} : Fair bro. But now I'm thinkin your just saying that cause you don't want to talk to me and think I'm boring.", ">>{liberationation} : I've never encountered your username before, so I don't know if you're boring or not yet."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{altheist} : How Republicans Could Replace Trump Even if He Stays In', ">>{altheist} : Proof Mitt Romney can take office and strip our constitutional rights away: [politico](http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/10/how-republicans-could-replace-trump-even-if-he-stays-in-214336) Proof he's strips away human rights: [His Agenda](http://www.thelibertyconservative.com/libertarian-party-goes-gestapo-supports-mass-surveillance-federal-snitching/) [His Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney) Keep Trump because he's a fresh start and clearly listening to the public, otherwise his message and plans wouldn't have shifted so vastly. He's a populist.", ">>{altheist} : I'm having to do it because you guys keep deleting my posts.", ">>{moxy801} : For a long time I've thought there was a factional war going on in the GOP between a Bush/Koch Brothers and Trump faction, but now I'm not so sure if the Kochs have not been working with Trump for awhile now. If this is so, I doubt the Bush faction has much clout anymore. I would also guess some of the Bush people will migrate to Trump now.", '>>{altheist} : Even democrats need to stop protesting, we need to do everything we can to prevent mass surveillance from taking over - bitching about Trump will make it more likely to happen.', '>>{moxy801} : > we need to do everything we can to prevent mass surveillance from taking over So what do you suggest be done given the current situation?', ">>{altheist} : Do exactly like Clinton said, give him a chance - Give Trump a chance because his team and his actions are speaking louder than his speeches, his simple words. What's happening in the oval office is a complete 180 from the shit he was saying to the rednecks that voted him in because he knows, and the government knows, that Americans will not tolerate that level of hatred. At least over 54% of American adults aren't bigots, which is important to remember. If he is a populist he'd be swayed by our opinion (like what he's shown in recent days), just like manufacturing companies have been.", ">>{moxy801} : > give him a chance - Like the 'chances' he's given to so many others? This guy ran with ZERO political track record - but he's lived a long time and has done many things to demonstrate he is 100% unsuitable to be President. >If he is a populist he'd be swayed by our opinion There is no evidence over his lifetime to demonstrate this. Do a search on just how outspoken he's been on behalf of Labor unions.", ">>{altheist} : Mitt Romney is responsible for the reason why China is so oppressed today and is struggling to fight for their human rights without retaliation. He is part of an organized scheme to control our lifestyles. That is unacceptable. We deserve human rights and civil rights. Romney doesn't believe in those things at all. You don't see the big picture.", ">>{altheist} : Okay, Trump became president due to the electrocal college alone, on December 19 they get to choose whether or not to keep him as president. He is our last chance to avoid being controlled by mass surveillance because the backup choice IS Mitt Romney and he is directly responsible for the mass surveillance camera program in China. It's because of him that they can't even protest without getting bulldozed over - I'm not even exaggerating, you have to read and see these stories when they happen.", '>>{moxy801} : > Mitt Romney and he is directly responsible for the mass surveillance camera program in China Link?', ">>{altheist} : I already posted it in here... Here's it is: [With 3 resources for proof](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5cpk6a/how_republicans_could_replace_trump_even_if_he/d9yc41r/?context=3)", ">>{moxy801} : And this is assuming that the Chinese government was not already 'mass survilleiling' its own people prior to Romney?"], [">>{Yuyumon} : Mattis is reportedly 'not happy' the White House is blocking his choice for a key staff position", '>>{ishabad} : The world is going to run out of popcorn at this rate', ">>{ianrl337} : I'm pretty sure Mattis is just Chuck Norris with his beard jackhammered off.", ">>{ailboles} : No. Make Mattis happy. He's about the only competent person in the White House now. Make him happy.", '>>{Seinfeldologist} : He won\'t last a year in this administration. I give it three months, tops, before he pulls the ol\' "I need to spend more time with my family."', ">>{ailboles} : oh god don't say that. If mattis leaves the world is FUCKED.", '>>{NoTaxesTrump} : Shut up Mattis, President Bannon will call the shots.', ">>{Seinfeldologist} : Don't even worry about it. Trumps got the best defense. Bigly. Mattis is low energy. Sad.", '>>{BED_WETTER_BY_PROXY} : The most sane man in the Whitehouse is nicknamed "mad dog"', ">>{Cashavelli} : Yeah... pretty sure Mattis is the only reason we're not already at war with Iran.", '>>{SteveBannonEXPOSED} : Mattis and Kelly will not accept Trump\'s Bs for long. Pentagon already came out with a statement blaming Russia for Ukraine violence after Trump said "We don\'t know"', '>>{ForgettableUsername} : I think Trump only picked him because of the nickname.', ">>{Franz_Kafka} : Guy was a Marine, he's dealt with worse. Not a bad way to feed your ego too, thinking of yourself as the last defense against Trump/Bannon's terrible geopolitical ideas.", '>>{fuck_your_red_hat} : Can Mattis not be Chuck Norris? Chuck is sort of an asshole.', '>>{Robotlollipops} : Can Mattis just go ahead and be the President now? He seems to know what the fuck...a lot more than anyone else, anyway.', ">>{Freckled_daywalker} : The man was married to the Corps. No wives, no kids. If he leaves to spend time with anything, it'll be his books.", ">>{ianrl337} : Good point, Mattis is secretly half of Ron Swanson's mustache", ">>{l3ft1st} : Iran is actually the one country Mattis is actually *more* likely to lead us into war against. Search around, he's got a huge hard on for attacking Iran.", '>>{sleepingmoon} : Omg I just choked on my ice (which I have been chewing at an alarming rate, from sheer stress). Thanks for the laugh, I sure needed it today.'], [">>{ailboles} : >However, the administration official said Trump is less likely to pay the caucus much heed going forward. If he's going to try ignoring the freedom caucus, and they vote against him every time because of that, does it mean that effectively the republicans no longer have a majority in the house?", ">>{Lochmon} : Trump doesn't learn lessons, gave it up years ago.", '>>{Die-Bold} : I look forward to and do not doubt *for a second* a new age of nuanced Trump. Oh, he already fucked it up in this very article.', ">>{RamblingMutt} : Trump didn't learn shit. It was the Democrat's fault! No, no, Trump set it up so that Ryan would lose! That's it. It's Ryan's Fault! No, for real this time, its a 4d chess move to force people to stop looking into Russia! It's never Trump's fault, so he can never learn from his mistakes.", '>>{CannabinoidAndroid} : > It\'s never Trump\'s fault, so he can never learn from his mistakes. *And when they\'ve given you their all* *Some stagger and fall, afterall it\'s not easy.* *Banging your heart against* *some mad bugger\'s wall."*', ">>{Solterlun} : Shhh don't give it away let him do it.", ">>{newsified} : No he didn't. He already knew how to throw his allies under the bus.", '>>{PaulsRedditUsername} : >"He didn\'t care or particularly know about health care," a key GOP congressional aide said about Trump >"I got the sense that he had delegated a lot of the specifics...and he was going to support whatever they came up with regardless of good or bad, as long as it was some kind of repeal and replacement," This is what you get with a president who has no real morals or political beliefs. What motivates Trump is getting what Trump wants. There\'s no overarching philosophy. He has enemies and people he hates (like Obama) so he tries to screw them over, but mostly he just wants things and does whatever it takes to get them without considering long-term effects, or even immediate effects. He just wants.', ">>{HolyRomanPrince} : With the Paul Ryan drive by he pulled today I'm skeptical of this. Looks like they'll unify to get him out of power", ">>{Joshsports60} : A key part about passing legislation is about knowing what's in the FUCKING BILL!!! I bet you someone watching a 2 minute nightly news segment would be able to better explain this bill to Congress than Trump.", '>>{PutinPuppetTrump} : >**"He didn\'t care or particularly know about health care," a key GOP congressional aide said about Trump following the stunning defeat of the Republican health care plan Friday.** >"If you are going to be a great negotiator, you have to know about the subject matter," the aide said, **adding that overhauling health care is far different from building a golf course.** >At one meeting Trump held with members of the "Tuesday Group," an informal caucus of moderate Republicans, the lawmakers went around the room and answered where they stood on the bill. **When Pennsylvania\'s Charlie Dent said he was a "no," Trump replied, "Why am I even talking to you?"** >**"I don\'t give a shit what you guys think," Bannon exclaimed** at a Thursday night meeting with the caucus, a source familiar with the meeting said. The sense in the room was Bannon lost his cool. >Two sources in the Freedom Caucus meeting in the White House Cabinet Room on Thursday **confirmed that the President, when pressed about some of their policy concerns with the bill, said, "Forget about the little shit."** lol. What a fucking shit show President Puppet is. Also, the FBI is coming for you Comrade Donnie.', '>>{ophelia_jones} : Uhh... I mean, no, the Freedom Caucus are a failing caucus who vote illegally. Steve Bannon is a tremendous negotiator who makes good deals. >.>', '>>{watthefucksalommy} : Being fair, all Presidents do things to get what they want. It just so happens that most of the time, those Presidents want what they think is best for the American people. Trump, on the other hand, wants an entirely different category of thing than we\'ve seen in a while. He wants victory and adulation. And he wants to tear down people he perceives (but would never openly acknowledge) as being better than him. To this end, any policies and rhetoric that he creates have more than a tinge of spite and maliciousness to them. (He\'s also grossly incompetent and rubberstamping a hodgepodge of fantasy agendas for Paul Ryan, Steve Bannon, Reince Priebus, Daddy Vlad, his own pocketbook, and others, but if we\'re focusing on his "ideology" it revolves around revenge for perceived slights and "winning" in the public eye. He didn\'t care what was in the health care bill because he\'s stupid enough to believe the people who told him ObamaCare was a disaster and anything would be better. He didn\'t know anything about health care because, let\'s face it, his Intelligence score is about a 7 and he\'s not exactly curious enough to learn anything new.) Contrast this with Obama. We learned this week that Obama was an absolute political and policy-crafting genius. ACA is virtually unassailable from the direction of the right because in order to do what one part of the right wants, you lose the other. By reluctantly attaching his name to it, he accidentally lured the right into the Repeal and Replace trap. They got super emotional about it all but never bothered to build concensus about what to do after getting rid of it. Without a viable alternative, the American people will never buy into some fly-by-the-seat-of-our-pants plan and you get 17% approval ratings. But his real genius was in the crafting of the policy. Obama had what Trump will never even think to need: empathy and the ability to listen, legislative expertise, connections across the coalition, political capital gained by national popularity, and passion for the policy change you\'re trying to enact.'], [">>{scite} : Republican Ohio Gov. John Kasich joined the attack against Trump's criticism of the parents of a Muslim soldier who died in Iraq, tweeting out that the parents of those killed in action must always be treated with respect", ">>{dyzo-blue} : But Trump's racist supporters hate Muslims and immigrants more than they love patriots.", '>>{anon902503} : Or Johnson. Either way would be enough for Clinton to cruise to a win in OH.', '>>{ConsonantlyDrunk} : An alpha male never backs down, no matter what. Politics by domination.', '>>{lolator123} : You cant be racist against a muslim or an immigrant because neither of them are races', '>>{walter_neft} : Nah, that would torpedo any political ambitions he has as a republican. He\'ll use the bogus "vote your conscience" line so people could assume he voted Johnson or write-in while actually voting Clinton.', ">>{dyzo-blue} : **Race isn't a real thing.** Racism, however, is. And it includes bigotry against people based on their ethnic or religious background, melanin levels, ancestry, nation of origin, nose shape, accent, etc.", '>>{TRUMP_MAGA_} : Why? Hillary voted for the war that got this guys son killed. He focused his anger against the wrong person.', ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : For fucks sake, anybody who uses this shitty-ass argument basically proves that they're either too young to vote or they're just barely 18-19. EVERYONE WAS FOR THE WAR AFTER 9/11! 80% OF ALL AMERICANS WANTED IT! IF YOU WERE EVEN ALIVE BACK THEN, YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR IT!", ">>{canopoly} : Honestly, I'm surprised he hasn't at this point. He kind of already has de facto.", '>>{DeathBeforeTrump} : So did Pence and 98% of Republicans at the time.', '>>{TRUMP_MAGA_} : Which means Hillary was wrong and has blood on her hands.', '>>{DeathBeforeTrump} : Yes, she was. A lot of people were. Even Trump.', '>>{Wife97} : I agree. I wish he had said something like "utmost respect" because everyone should be treated with respect. The media have created a sewer of discourse that knows no boundaries.', '>>{TRUMP_MAGA_} : Hillary voted for the war that this guys son got killed in. Fact.', '>>{IamDavidBrockAMA} : Always? Forever and ever with no questions? When did we start deifying soldiers so damn much.', ">>{Ayesuku} : You're focused on the wrong problem. Who gives a shit how you describe hate when the hate exists regardless?", ">>{BlabberingEndlessly} : It's funny, Trump is probably whacking loads and loads off into a silver chalice right now. The media continues to report on this stupid bullshit, makes money off of stupid people who really care and get all worked up about it. News flash: if this post angers you, you are a sad being with minor capacity for intelligence. Who. Cares. This is seriously grade A reality TV level monkey shit. Everyone's gonna say something, eventually, and *THIS* will be what starts World War 3. You think Benghazi was bad? You think the extermination of muskrats and purple badgers was a bad thing? You just wait.", ">>{scite} : It's funny, seeing rightwing Trump supporters coming out to attack veterans and soldiers.", ">>{IamDavidBrockAMA} : It's funny seeing the left turn into the army bootlickers this time.", '>>{neweraccount123} : When they trot out their dead loved one as a weapon to attack the sacrifices others have made for their country and treat it like a currency that gives them the right to demean others with impunity, they deserve ZERO respect.', ">>{liberationation} : Racist, bigot, sexist, homophobe—doesn't matter, they are all the same problem: collectivism, misunderstanding, and prejudice.", ">>{liberationation} : Who is deifying soldiers? These people went up on stage to point out Trump's hypocrisy, not make their son a god.", '>>{IamDavidBrockAMA} : >always be treated with respect Not even then in particular. So now they are saying that there is literally nothing a vets parents could do to lose respect? How hyperbolic', ">>{liberationation} : No one is bemoaning the war in this case though, the problem is that Trump's rhetoric implies that Muslims never do anything good for this country, and nothing could be further from the truth, symbolized by this one Muslim soldier sacrificing more than Trump ever will.", ">>{scite} : 'Army bootlicker'? Is that the mouth you kiss the ground the veterans stood on?", ">>{Honztastic} : Honestly, no they shouldnt. Being related to someone doesn't get you a magic pass for behavior. Unless you're a Clinton. Trump ia wrong in this instance, but the principle espoused by Kasich is stupid.", '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Its a way of saying his hate his okay because its not racism, which is the most well known form', ">>{OliveItMaggle} : Are you really trying to argue we shouldn't treat others with respect?", '>>{IamDavidBrockAMA} : Nobody should permanently have unconditional respect forever, no.', '>>{neptune1492} : If Gold star families wish to be free of political attacks, perhaps they should not put themselves on the DNC stage and make political attacks. Islamic jihadists killed their son, not Trump.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Yes, every person should be treated with respect.', ">>{spacehxcc} : So did virtually everybody else. You're really grasping at straws here.", '>>{kiddestructo} : Pretty much her entire adult life for PUBLIC service. You think she puts up with all this bullshit so she can see her name in lights on some building? No, she actually cares about others.', ">>{jimbo831} : It's sad to me because you're right. I would have so much respect for the man if he did that. Those are the kind of politicians we need on both sides. But I don't blame him for not doing it because it would in fact end his career. That's the sad reality of our partisanship.", '>>{TRUMP_MAGA_} : HAHAHAHAHA!!! the only person she fucking served is herself.', ">>{reality-distortion} : That isn't even remotely true. There were massive protest at the time. I'm one of the people who called Hillary Clinton's office begging for her to vote no and give the weapons inspectors time to finish the job. Polls were not overwhelmingly in favor of war, despite the media's constant push. There was very strong opposition, even within the government where there were competing bills that Clinton could have supported that would have slowed down Bush/Cheney's mad rush. It was widely known that Bush was using ginned up evidence. You want people to believe that workaholic Clinton was a clueless moron. Ha. She was a political opportunist, period.", ">>{jimbo831} : >Islamic jihadists killed their son, not Trump. It's not about who killed their son. It's about the fact that if Trump had his way their son would've never been allowed into this country and never would've been able to serve in our military and make the sacrifice he made for his fellow soldiers.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : Hmm? There were protests, 20% of 300 million people is alot of people, and they didn't want the war. I didn't deny that, but where's your source that 'polls were not overwhelmingly in favor?'", '>>{kiddestructo} : Yawn, sos, different day. Reality says otherwise.', ">>{Fronesis} : Dude has the haircut of an old lesbian. I don't get why he had it cut; it looked fine before.", ">>{ThatsOneBadMF} : So you don't agree with Kasich - that's fair. In this particular situation with the Kahn family, did they do anything to warrant a lack of respect?", ">>{Fronesis} : I was alive then. I was one of the eleven million that protested it before it even got off the ground. Don't be presumptuous about people lambasting Hillary for it. It was an unjust war of aggression and lots of right-thinking people opposed it. She could have been one of them.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : I couldn't protest since I was too young, but I know for damn sure that I would have. That said, it's hard to find any person in power at the time who was against the was, and Hillary did say she supported the war as a last resort.", ">>{Fronesis} : How does this mitigate her responsibility at all? She should be held to account for the hundreds of thousands that died as a result of her actions. Doesn't matter that she wasn't the only one undertaking the action.", ">>{Aeschylus-} : Actually Pakistani isn't a race it's a nationality. The parents are probably Punjabi, or some other North Indian ethnicity", '>>{Aeschylus-} : Easy to be wrong when your president is lying to you', ">>{Saltysweetcake} : Why didn't Republicans like Kasich? He seemed like the most reasonable choice.", '>>{jimbo831} : So? I never said it was. This comment is just a non sequitur.', ">>{Saltysweetcake} : Thank you! I lived in Manhatten during that time and even most of the New Yorkers thought the Iraq War protesters were insane. We were all mislead. We were all scared...we were almost all united as a country and the Bush admin used this to convince us and Congress to go to war with Iraq. Cheney & Friends were frothing at the mouth to attack Iraq pre 911. This wasn't at all obvious at the time. Except I'm pretty sure some higher ups knew it was really about oil. During that time even in conversation if you said we were only invading over oil you were seen as a pariah. Anyone else remember this crazy time?", '>>{-dachande-} : Punjabi is a language. And race is a social construct used throughout history to describe people of the same language, nationality, ethnicity, and lately, even religion.', '>>{BirdsInTheNest} : Deflecting seems to be the only strategy with Trump supporters.', ">>{JellyDonutJerry} : Just because he had a respectable tweet doesn't mean his run in the primaries was any good. He was awful at giving speeches and would get flustered at the tiniest things.", ">>{spacehxcc} : Should, let's say Mike Pence, also be held equally accountable seeing how he also voted for the war?", ">>{LABAW} : The american government has inertia, the Iraq war was happening regardless of 9/11 IMHO. That's why it was easy to be against. It was in the weeds before the attacks and I remember thinking at the election we had decided to go to war with Iraq, during 9/11, and up to the war. That war was such a shame...", ">>{LABAW} : They are political pawns riding the coat tails of their late son. Biden didn't do it, thank god.", '>>{2chainz3felonies} : Because they were too busy falling head over heels for racist Cheeto man.', '>>{2chainz3felonies} : Except Joe the Plummer was a fake and this is real.', ">>{2chainz3felonies} : Yeah. Not to mention that it's easy to attack a voting record when you have never held public office and therefore have never had the chance to vote.", ">>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : to prove your point: We can't hate the family of terrorists.", ">>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : Unless you're a Democrat, then you redefine the rhetoric and rationalize the events.", '>>{Saltysweetcake} : I was being sarcastic btw :) A marine dying for a heroic deed to save his fellow marines is not equal in any way to Joe the plumber.', '>>{2chainz3felonies} : Nah I got what you were saying. I was just reminding everyone that Joe was outed as a phoney', ">>{lerussianspy} : Yeah, a religion isn't a race. Religion is an ideology, not a genetic disposition. edit: to the people downvoting me thinking religion is a race you are what's wrong with this country. Regardless of your politic views you can't change definitions and you should be truthful to yourself and learn to think with logic and reason.", ">>{progress10} : No it's not. He will be back in 2020.", ">>{WhyDoges} : Don't try. I got into arguments with enough bigots. They make it an argument over semantics to cover the fact they are a large piece of shit.", ">>{WhyDoges} : Her vote didn't mean shit in the end. They were going to war with or without her.", ">>{WhyDoges} : She didn't command the war, serve on a committee for it, led troops, and regreted her decision. She voted for the war and nothing else. They got faulty intel and her vote would not have changed anything. It ends when she voted in favor.", '>>{PM_me_nachos} : You wanna get into a semantics debate? Ok. Trump is a vile bigot whose platform emphasizes on hate and bigotry and nothing but hate and bigotry. There, is that better? I didnt know being called a bigot was better than being a called a racist.', ">>{CheezStik} : Well they certainly don't like math! He had by far the best numbers against Hillary and would probably be beating her now", '>>{kajkajete} : The man ran 13 elections in his lifetime. This is the first one he loses.', '>>{kajkajete} : He hates the Clintons. Heck, when he was asked he said that there were more chances he voted for Trump than for Clinton.', '>>{CDXXRoman} : >Punjabi is a language. Yes and Japanese is a language. >Punjabi people, are an Indo-Aryan ethnic group originating from the Punjab region, found in Pakistan and northern India "Punjabi people" on @Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjabi_people?wprov=sfta1', ">>{-dachande-} : You're getting hung up on the wrong thing. The point is that hating someone because they are Pakistani is racist...regardless of whether you consider nationality to be a race", ">>{ThatsOneBadMF} : Eh, I'm not gonna name call here, I just wanted a direct answer about Kahn instead of a strawman argument.", '>>{plumb0b} : [Mother of a fallen soldier talks at RNC and the liberal pundits attack her and the RNC for "using a grieving family member for partisan gain".](https://i.reddituploads.com/5cbcb5f7f3144550a44eb3a7c51dd4d2?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=95ce93f99f7de0ac825878d29e8f68aa) Good to know the hypocrites are out in full force here. You can really see that extra $5M CTR funding at work.', '>>{uncertainpath} : Well over 50 percent of the vote as going to Cruz and Trump. They were very similar candidates in their positions. It seems like it was just due to the makeup of the electorate.', ">>{Saltysweetcake} : That's really unfortunate for them. Honestly, I wouldn't know who to choose between those two myself.", '>>{copperwatt} : Math is an establishment conspiracy. Math is also the reason Bernie "lost". COINCIDENCE??!?', ">>{Daverost} : > parents of those killed in action must always be treated with respect I agree, but when you sling shit first, you get shit slung back at you. You don't get to cry victim when you take the first shot just because your child was KIA. I mean it's terrible that it happened, but it doesn't give you free reign to just do and say whatever with no repercussion or response from those addressed. EDIT: To clarify, I mean this: > Let me ask you: have you even read the United States constitution? I will gladly lend you my copy. I mean it's clearly not patronizing at all! No, this dude took the first shot on being disrespectful to Trump. He lost his right to a respectful reply.", '>>{Fronesis} : Fuck yea he should. And Bush should have been hanged as a war criminal.', '>>{lalilulelo09} : Because a lot of them **really** hate brown people. That to them takes precedence over anything else.', ">>{lalilulelo09} : Yes, Trump throwing gasoline on a dumpster fire is Hilary's fault. Trump didn't have to engage but he did because he is an little insecure narcissist who can't keep his mouth shut.", '>>{swagcoffin} : The difference is one is running for president, and the other probably should.', ">>{WaitWhatHuhWhat} : I'm not from the US, but aren't you using examples of opinion pieces to counter a Republican criticising Trump? Sure if this was a story about a journalist making contradictory statement your picture would be relevant, but somehow falls short to what this article is actually about.", '>>{MaVagina} : Yes, everyone who voted for that war should be killed for the sake of peace.', ">>{MaVagina} : Totally. I'm the same way. Once I've made up my mind about something, i refuse to learn more about it. I mean, I'm not some lame nerd scientist or something; information just clouds my judgment.", '>>{blatherskiter} : So, if you disliked someone because they were a white member of the Aryan Nation or Nazi Party, that would be racist of you?', ">>{RooftopBBQ} : Because if republicans were reasonable they'd vote democrat. The republicans abandoned reason when they aimed their party at the religious right and later the tea party.", '>>{CapnSheff} : I don\'t know about "most always" be treated with respect because the parents might be a bag of shit compared to their hero kid, but in this case yes', '>>{liberationation} : Or maybe I was done talking to this trump supporter. It was getting boring.', '>>{nerfAvari} : now describe how Trump hates those who you claim he does', ">>{MaVagina} : Fair bro. But now I'm thinkin your just saying that cause you don't want to talk to me and think I'm boring.", ">>{liberationation} : I've never encountered your username before, so I don't know if you're boring or not yet."], ['>>{anthroengineer} : Greens sue Obama to stop fossil fuel production on federal land', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : You gotta love environmentalists... they're all for shutting down energy production but unwilling to give up one iota of energy consumption. Go Hypocrisy!!!", ">>{aritworld1} : If Obama were actually a progressive he wouldn't be getting sued by real progressive groups. He is a sellout and so is Hillary Clinton. We desperately need additional political parties in this country that are actually mature enough, and ethical enough to run our nation properly.", ">>{blackontheinternets} : I wonder how much they are leasing the land for? I remember a few years back, it was $1.50 an acre. Seems like they should be sue them in order to get them to raise the prices or something useful. Or just don't, whatever.", '>>{WinkleCream} : The real problem with these deals is they are selling them for dirt cheap.', '>>{WinkleCream} : Bingo. Bill Clinton was sued by progressive groups including unions when he was president. Hillary Clinton is going to get it from the left and right.', '>>{buzzit292} : How did you arrive at this conclusion? The environmentalists I know are all for conservation, riding bikes, walking or using smaller cars, for example?', '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : You think of effective environmentalism as those acts adopted by individuals but in fact those acts are meaningless. The vast overwhelming impact of humanity isn\'t in driving a Prius, but in manufacturing a Prius. In mining. In smelting. In manufacturing. The toxic residue of batteries. The pollution extruded by the power plant to charge it. You can extrapolate these disparate costs to all aspects of our first world existence down to your computer(s), your phone, watch, activity tracker, refrigerator, sheets, pants, television, etc etc etc. Do you have Clue One what it takes to stock your local grocery store so that one can exist on a Vegan diet? Because the pollution inherent in manufacturing and energy production occurs far far away from most consumers we are largely blissfully ignorant of these realities or at least don\'t truly have our nose rubbed in them. But it is quite impossible to enact meaningful change because to do so would entail massive death and suffering. There is no way for the 1st world to be sustainable without returning to the Dark Ages. If you\'re any student of history you might have a clue what that was like. But the REAL problem isn\'t our privileged selves, it\'s the billions and billions of people who want what we have. Speaking for myself I live in a very modest apartment but I know what it took to harvest the lumber, mine the gypsum, saw the 2x4 and structural supports. Manufacture the concrete. I have constant electricity in every room, air conditioning, refrigeration, natural gas on demand. I have a 32" television, three cell phones, computers, tablets, internet. My cupboards are packed with food. I have filtered water in five gallon jugs because the kids don\'t care for the taste of the tap water (which is perfectly clean). In a global sense this kind of existence is extremely... almost unbelievably... privileged. Because we\'re surrounded by extreme wealth and privilege we don\'t see it the same way as someone in the slums of Mumbai may see it. But they want it. Everyone wants it.', ">>{buzzit292} : I don't think all that you attribute to me. I understand your argument and I think we need national policy to achieve changes in line with the scale of problem. I wouldn't say we have to get to return to the dark ages even if resources become more evenly distributed. I am seeing a pattern in that you project beliefs onto people! You originally said environmentalists weren't willing to cut one iota of energy consumption, when in fact many clearly are. I know many who go with out cars altogether, become vegetarian. Having fewer children, for whatever reason, is the norm. Energy efficiency of all the devices you mention has increased, and electric power consumption per capita in the us hasn't been increasing since 2000. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PC?locations=US", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : You are correct when you say that I project beliefs onto people; the medium demands it. You know (or you know that I claimed) to be a parent, and you may presume that I'm male (as I am). But even if there were a 'national policy' to achieve changes 'inline with the scale of the problem' that would only impact and arguably cripple the economy of 4.5% of the global population. No, the sad reality is... and I understand you wishing to reject this... that we are going to continue to go on our merry way until things go 'BOOM' of their own inertia. Don't worry. It shouldn't be much longer."]]

classify and reply

['>>{KrombopulosMichael23} : Yup. Using iPhone 7 32GB with the intel modem, have noticed less battery life over the day. Maybe in the realm of 10-25% less dependent on conditions.', ">>{Scithmal} : Yeah. That's really bad. I hope 10.3.2 fixes it Edit: it's probably the worst battery I've had in the iOS 10 versions.", ">>{Dewey_Cox_} : Yes my battery has gotten way worse since 10.3.1 which is disappointing since iOS 10.3 was the best battery life I've ever had", '>>{crazyk4952} : Overnight, my iPhone battery dropped by 12% last night. No notifications were received and fetch email was turned off.', ">>{MannyFresh1989} : Dang I'm not the only one. I was considering taking it in to Apple to check it out. I'll lose like 40% battery life overnight if it's not plugged in.", ">>{Iracles80} : Thanks for this I was about to update my phone to 10.3.1 I'll hold off", ">>{jumpingrunt} : US missile strike took out 20% of Syria's airforce, Mattis claims", ">>{SACHD} : I think I'm getting worse standby time as well.", ">>{AnonymousSkull} : I don't like the sound of this. I literally just updated a few minutes ago.", ">>{FuckNope} : Same thing here, except some days it will be worse, some days it will be better. It also depends on what apps I'm using, if I'm on Reddit then the battery percentage rarely goes down. Then if I switch to snapchat or something else that uses the display, camera, audio etc. I watch the battery jump from 74% to 71% (just did this right now). It's almost as if through changing how the iPhone manages power to stop the unexpected shutdowns in 10.2.1 for other devices it messed up the battery measurements for other iPhones too and how much battery the device will use. That and my battery will be 10/20% less since 10.2.1. Hoping for 10.3.2 to be my saviour!", ">>{Scithmal} : Yeah...it seems iOS 10.3.1 has really screwed it up for a lot of people. That's what they get for not doing betas!", ">>{Scithmal} : I know right. This is what they get for not doing betas on 10.3.1...hopefully since 10.3.2 has betas it'll be fixed as they can tell how battery is from the community that way.", ">>{prostitutepiss} : There are now 5 different answers to the air strikes as given by Trump and team. Maddow has a short piece about it today: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/trump-camp-unclear-on-syria-mission-s-result-918422595937 Can't get the fuckin story straight!", '>>{ChumpAdministration} : Well, there goes any credibility this guy had.', ">>{Bosko93} : It's bullshit Maybe he meant 20% of operational airplanes on that airfield Edit : yep >American military officials said 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles had struck their targets at the airfield, destroying 20 to 25 aircraft: roughly 20 percent of the Seventh Wing of the Syrian Air Force. One missile aborted after launch and fell into the Mediterranean.", '>>{6p6ss6} : The missile strike reportedly took out 20-25 MiG-23s (the Russians say 6 MiG-23s). Those planes are as outdated as American F-4s that were taken out of combat use 20 years ago. The real strength of the Syrian Air Force is in its later generation MiG-29s, none of which were reported destroyed in this missile attack.', '>>{fatbaptist} : 3 cruise missiles per plane seems like a lot to use in a "surprise attack"', '>>{luke_luke_luke} : Apparently the planes were in bunkers so you needed 1-2 missiles to break through. They also prob targeted buildings and other non-flying things.', '>>{tau-lepton} : Bunkers? Nope, hangers. Maybe with a cinder block wall.', '>>{Riganthor} : well syria didnt have a lot of stuff left to begin with so its not impossible but... it doesnt mean you destroyed a lot of aircraft', ">>{Colinm478} : Except those Mig-23s are more than enough for bombing civilians who aren't armed with SAMs (as in, all of them). We still fly the A-10 Warthog, despite the fact that ANY AA, including flak guns can kill them. Why? Because against poorly armed targets they are more than capable. Those Mig-29s are no more effective at committing genocide than the Mig-23s, and if it ever comes to AA combat with NATO forces, the Mig-29s will be easily destroyed as well.", '>>{6p6ss6} : Fair enough. But the MiG-23 is not an effective way to deliver bombs; it is a relatively light manouverable fighter, not a heavy bomber. Against civilians without SAMs, helicopters are the most effective delivery system.', ">>{Colinm478} : Sure but neither is the Mig-29. The Su-22 is far better for bombing civilians (and several of Assad's limited quantity were destroyed). Also, helicopters can easily be taken out by unguided RPGs, and small arms fire. Ask the parents of Corey J. Goodnature.", '>>{d_mcc_x} : Imagine the damage they could have done if they had aimed for the runway.', '>>{DragonPup} : If only the United States had munitions and tactics for doing that! Oh wait, we do.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : The real strength of Syria's Air Force is the Russian Air Force. Who's kidding who?", ">>{d_mcc_x} : I also liked the argument that cruise missles aren't good for hardened targets like runways, even though they used them to take out reinforced bunkers.", '>>{Sykirobme} : > We still fly the A-10 Warthog, despite the fact that ANY AA, including flak guns can kill them. Why? Because against poorly armed targets they are more than capable. That\'s not really the reason we still fly them. A-10s are low-altitude ground support aircraft. They\'re incredibly resilient and massively effective at their job. Look around for the controversy surrounding the earlier retirement of the aircraft in favor of drones (one AF officer likened drones to "trying to navigate while looking through a soda straw" in an article I read a couple years back). The Air Force doesn\'t want a ground support aircraft because they don\'t want to be considered a subservient branch of the military. It\'s a silly controversy (and I love the AF; my dad was in for 22 years). They continue to be used because they\'re superior in terms of visibility and accuracy.', ">>{Sykirobme} : Where's that quote from? Did they revise or clarify? Because the [official statement](https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/1146758/statement-by-secretary-of-defense-jim-mattis-on-the-us-military-response-to-the?source=GovDelivery) says: >The assessment of the Department of Defense is that the strike resulted in the damage or destruction of fuel and ammunition sites, air defense capabilities, and **20 percent of Syria’s operational aircraft.** The Syrian government has lost the ability to refuel or rearm aircraft at Shayrat airfield and at this point, use of the runway is of idle military interest.", '>>{Sykirobme} : Yeah, I was disappointed to hear that last night. Dammit, Jim.', '>>{SultanObama} : Have you seen the images? They were basically bunkers.', '>>{jumpingrunt} : But why? Do you have better knowledge of the situation than the SecDef?', '>>{theRealRedherring} : the defense contractors have been having a collective tantric wargasm for days.', '>>{Colinm478} : Except they are useless against any military. As you know, even during desert storm they were obsolete against sadam. They are good at ground attacks, sure; but ANY AA will destroy them. They are only useful for CAS against poorly equipped rebels.', '>>{Colinm478} : 6 were shot down in Desert Storm by SA-9 and SA-13 SAMS; and 57mm S-60 AA guns. In addition, another 15 were damaged, with 5 never returning to combat. You have google, find your own citations, this is common knowledge.', '>>{Sykirobme} : Shot down over Bowling Green, then, eh? e.e']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{KrombopulosMichael23} : Yup. Using iPhone 7 32GB with the intel modem, have noticed less battery life over the day. Maybe in the realm of 10-25% less dependent on conditions.', ">>{Scithmal} : Yeah. That's really bad. I hope 10.3.2 fixes it Edit: it's probably the worst battery I've had in the iOS 10 versions.", ">>{Dewey_Cox_} : Yes my battery has gotten way worse since 10.3.1 which is disappointing since iOS 10.3 was the best battery life I've ever had", '>>{crazyk4952} : Overnight, my iPhone battery dropped by 12% last night. No notifications were received and fetch email was turned off.', ">>{MannyFresh1989} : Dang I'm not the only one. I was considering taking it in to Apple to check it out. I'll lose like 40% battery life overnight if it's not plugged in.", ">>{Iracles80} : Thanks for this I was about to update my phone to 10.3.1 I'll hold off", ">>{SACHD} : I think I'm getting worse standby time as well.", ">>{AnonymousSkull} : I don't like the sound of this. I literally just updated a few minutes ago.", ">>{FuckNope} : Same thing here, except some days it will be worse, some days it will be better. It also depends on what apps I'm using, if I'm on Reddit then the battery percentage rarely goes down. Then if I switch to snapchat or something else that uses the display, camera, audio etc. I watch the battery jump from 74% to 71% (just did this right now). It's almost as if through changing how the iPhone manages power to stop the unexpected shutdowns in 10.2.1 for other devices it messed up the battery measurements for other iPhones too and how much battery the device will use. That and my battery will be 10/20% less since 10.2.1. Hoping for 10.3.2 to be my saviour!", ">>{Scithmal} : Yeah...it seems iOS 10.3.1 has really screwed it up for a lot of people. That's what they get for not doing betas!", ">>{Scithmal} : I know right. This is what they get for not doing betas on 10.3.1...hopefully since 10.3.2 has betas it'll be fixed as they can tell how battery is from the community that way."], [">>{jumpingrunt} : US missile strike took out 20% of Syria's airforce, Mattis claims", ">>{prostitutepiss} : There are now 5 different answers to the air strikes as given by Trump and team. Maddow has a short piece about it today: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/trump-camp-unclear-on-syria-mission-s-result-918422595937 Can't get the fuckin story straight!", '>>{ChumpAdministration} : Well, there goes any credibility this guy had.', ">>{Bosko93} : It's bullshit Maybe he meant 20% of operational airplanes on that airfield Edit : yep >American military officials said 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles had struck their targets at the airfield, destroying 20 to 25 aircraft: roughly 20 percent of the Seventh Wing of the Syrian Air Force. One missile aborted after launch and fell into the Mediterranean.", '>>{6p6ss6} : The missile strike reportedly took out 20-25 MiG-23s (the Russians say 6 MiG-23s). Those planes are as outdated as American F-4s that were taken out of combat use 20 years ago. The real strength of the Syrian Air Force is in its later generation MiG-29s, none of which were reported destroyed in this missile attack.', '>>{fatbaptist} : 3 cruise missiles per plane seems like a lot to use in a "surprise attack"', '>>{luke_luke_luke} : Apparently the planes were in bunkers so you needed 1-2 missiles to break through. They also prob targeted buildings and other non-flying things.', '>>{tau-lepton} : Bunkers? Nope, hangers. Maybe with a cinder block wall.', '>>{Riganthor} : well syria didnt have a lot of stuff left to begin with so its not impossible but... it doesnt mean you destroyed a lot of aircraft', ">>{Colinm478} : Except those Mig-23s are more than enough for bombing civilians who aren't armed with SAMs (as in, all of them). We still fly the A-10 Warthog, despite the fact that ANY AA, including flak guns can kill them. Why? Because against poorly armed targets they are more than capable. Those Mig-29s are no more effective at committing genocide than the Mig-23s, and if it ever comes to AA combat with NATO forces, the Mig-29s will be easily destroyed as well.", '>>{6p6ss6} : Fair enough. But the MiG-23 is not an effective way to deliver bombs; it is a relatively light manouverable fighter, not a heavy bomber. Against civilians without SAMs, helicopters are the most effective delivery system.', ">>{Colinm478} : Sure but neither is the Mig-29. The Su-22 is far better for bombing civilians (and several of Assad's limited quantity were destroyed). Also, helicopters can easily be taken out by unguided RPGs, and small arms fire. Ask the parents of Corey J. Goodnature.", '>>{d_mcc_x} : Imagine the damage they could have done if they had aimed for the runway.', '>>{DragonPup} : If only the United States had munitions and tactics for doing that! Oh wait, we do.', ">>{2pumpTrump} : The real strength of Syria's Air Force is the Russian Air Force. Who's kidding who?", ">>{d_mcc_x} : I also liked the argument that cruise missles aren't good for hardened targets like runways, even though they used them to take out reinforced bunkers.", '>>{Sykirobme} : > We still fly the A-10 Warthog, despite the fact that ANY AA, including flak guns can kill them. Why? Because against poorly armed targets they are more than capable. That\'s not really the reason we still fly them. A-10s are low-altitude ground support aircraft. They\'re incredibly resilient and massively effective at their job. Look around for the controversy surrounding the earlier retirement of the aircraft in favor of drones (one AF officer likened drones to "trying to navigate while looking through a soda straw" in an article I read a couple years back). The Air Force doesn\'t want a ground support aircraft because they don\'t want to be considered a subservient branch of the military. It\'s a silly controversy (and I love the AF; my dad was in for 22 years). They continue to be used because they\'re superior in terms of visibility and accuracy.', ">>{Sykirobme} : Where's that quote from? Did they revise or clarify? Because the [official statement](https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/1146758/statement-by-secretary-of-defense-jim-mattis-on-the-us-military-response-to-the?source=GovDelivery) says: >The assessment of the Department of Defense is that the strike resulted in the damage or destruction of fuel and ammunition sites, air defense capabilities, and **20 percent of Syria’s operational aircraft.** The Syrian government has lost the ability to refuel or rearm aircraft at Shayrat airfield and at this point, use of the runway is of idle military interest.", '>>{Sykirobme} : Yeah, I was disappointed to hear that last night. Dammit, Jim.', '>>{SultanObama} : Have you seen the images? They were basically bunkers.', '>>{jumpingrunt} : But why? Do you have better knowledge of the situation than the SecDef?', '>>{theRealRedherring} : the defense contractors have been having a collective tantric wargasm for days.', '>>{Colinm478} : Except they are useless against any military. As you know, even during desert storm they were obsolete against sadam. They are good at ground attacks, sure; but ANY AA will destroy them. They are only useful for CAS against poorly equipped rebels.', '>>{Colinm478} : 6 were shot down in Desert Storm by SA-9 and SA-13 SAMS; and 57mm S-60 AA guns. In addition, another 15 were damaged, with 5 never returning to combat. You have google, find your own citations, this is common knowledge.', '>>{Sykirobme} : Shot down over Bowling Green, then, eh? e.e']]

classify and reply

['>>{mt_weather} : Why not Debbie? Why not Donna? Why not Wolf Blitzer and Jake Tapper? Why not take over every idiot democrat who bent the knee for clinton? democrats are a mess.', ">>{wytxcook} : I support this. While they're at it, maybe one of them can ask him why his niece hasn't moved to Mexico yet.", '>>{dumbchuck} : Clinton to California Voters: "Your Votes Will Not Affect the Democratic Primary Whatsoever"', ">>{UnburdenedAndRelaxed} : It's irresponsible to put a quote of someone saying something they did not say.", ">>{greenlife2} : Good for Hillary for telling the truth. CA doesn't count for shit.", '>>{lightninhopkins} : This isnt a quote. Common Dreams is garbage.', ">>{jnr_77} : Because college campuses are literally the only place they have leverage. Colleges want your money. The DNC wants your votes and they're banking on getting them no matter how much you hate them.", ">>{topcutter} : It wasn't supposed to be this way! Sob! Whine!", '>>{Davillage} : >Do you think Clinton is more of a Saruman or a Sauron? Queen Cercei', '>>{red-17} : Someone needs to explain to this site what quotation marks mean.', '>>{americanrabbit} : These damn first amendment people exercising their rights. Now this is a first amendment resolution.', '>>{ThisMachineKILLS} : Why is that in quotes? She didn\'t say that. The actual quote: "I will be the nominee for my party, Chris. That is already done, in effect. There is no way that I won’t be."', '>>{Thringo} : Who is Grima Wormtongue in all of this? I would say Brock, but that assumes that Hillary is somewhat a good person.', ">>{Jordan117} : To be fair, the quotes were added by OP, and aren't in the source article. But that means it should be deleted for not being an exact copy of the headline.", ">>{24Willard} : He has the most current influence over the party beyond Obama. Makes sense to me to protest and physically show him the progressive direction is the only direction. I'm frankly proud of the young kids taking their future seriously", ">>{greenlife2} : This. CA doesn't matter but those people there are to stupid to understand that. Why bother voting when Hillary, who a majority of people there support, has already won?", '>>{C01besaurus} : The only limit to the number of wormtongues or wormtails she has is what her darling billionaires will afford her.', '>>{mt_weather} : why does he have any influence in the party at all? his own daughter will be leaving the country because of this election. why are democrats letting him stay?', '>>{Cupinacup} : Commondreams must obviously not be that common judging by how their preferred candidate is faring.', ">>{xwing_n_it} : I assumed from context it wasn't a real quote. I think it's so obviously satirical it doesn't count as deceptive.", ">>{reid8470} : >At least two dozen protesters, some allied with Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter, staged a sit-in at the Washington office of Sen. Charles Schumer, next in line to lead Democrats in the Senate. Two... dozen? Oh my. Tens of thousands of people have protested against Trump's victory in Schumer's NYC and DC alone, let alone the rest of the country. But watch out, two dozen sat in an office.", '>>{yennenga} : >“Forward together, not one step back!” the young protesters chanted in unison, according to a video of the event posted on social media. Schumer has been criticized for his close ties to Wall Street and his failure to help Democrats perform better in the election. Wonder why? At least publicly, [Schumer has no worries](http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/438481/chuck-schumer-democrats-will-lose-blue-collar-whites-gain-suburbs) about his party’s dwindling fortunes among working-class white voters. “For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.”', ">>{24Willard} : Why is irrelevant. It's the case. He already signaled moving in that direction by endorsing Ellison. The Republicans are in for a long as shit 4 years", '>>{mt_weather} : lol trying to make a black muslim the butt of literally every joke. good luck kids. good luck. you\'re gonna need it all if that\'s your "master plan". thanks in advance for the stronger Green and Labor parties when the DNC finally burns itself to the ground in 4k.', '>>{yennenga} : My parents voted for Bernie in CA, because voting for Clinton once is enough.', ">>{24Willard} : I feel like we probably have more in common than you might think. I despise both establishment structures and the media. They created all this decisiveness. I don't have beef with you even if we have different perspectives. There are too many people in this country and we're split ideologically like we've always been. We must find balance again or violence will be the only way out for whomever is pushed into a corner. Why would anyone want that?", '>>{mt_weather} : how does that balance come, though? should we shame them for the 4 months they insulted us. should we shame them for the 15 months the mocked us. should we exile them for the 25 years that they poisoned the public discourse? how much punishment is enough to bring back a generation of voters the Clantoons and her criminal cabal worked a generation to throw out of the party? how will democrats ever be able to credibly go forward? it seems like the left is trying make the lead balloon fly again, when it should just bern it down and start a genuine labor party. if violence is not to be the answer, then exceptionally harsh self-criticism will have to take its place. the clintons must feel bern.', ">>{24Willard} : I could understand you feeling that way considering your leanings but what about the obstructionism by the right? What about the fact the Dems won the popular vote and after counting Cali will be likely 1-2 million better. Look she lost understandably because she was a dog shit candidate for the climate. But my point isn't about the leadership of the past but what we do about it now. I feel as though the left is undergoing what the right went through with the tea party when Obama won.", '>>{red-17} : True, but even still the title is pretty pathetic.', '>>{topcutter} : Yeah, that strategy played out beautifully for Hillary!', ">>{Fractal_Soul} : There are more seats on a ballot than just the Party's Presidential Nominee. You should express yourself in your *local* politics as well-- by voting, for one thing.", '>>{gmrepublican} : Clinton was also quoted as saying "Heinrich Himmler is my hero" and "if I could charge a head tax on Puerto Ricans, I would". Like, nowhere does she say anything close to what\'s in the title. Holy clickbait.', ">>{Escapist83} : I'm not a fan of Hilary, but she didn't say those words.", '>>{topcutter} : I know, Tim Kaine must have been giving a speech.', ">>{remeard} : Doesn't matter, anti Hillary article. Already on its way to front page", '>>{Simoni_Deo} : Yes, Clinton is too great for the great state of California.', '>>{circlegetsthejerk} : I Take offense at this. All the beings you list have personalities. You are insulting them.', '>>{Do-u-like-fishsticks} : Obviously she didnt say that, but honestly its true. Sanders would have to win 90% or more to even close to coming to her non superdelegate number. California is pretty much irrelevant to anyone who can do math', '>>{fer_d} : Of course it does. It could actually get her to the nomination threshold without one single super delegate.', '>>{916hotdogs} : As much as I hate her, I love this. Shut those Bernie Babies down! ^^then ^^lose ^^to ^^Trump', ">>{Ovedya2011} : I think the general idea is that coming out of California she really doesn't give a shit about how Sanders does, because she believes she already has the nomination cinched up. Such confidence can be a huge mistake.", '>>{WritingFromSpace} : it isnt a quote but its an accurate paraphrasing. Though this is old news', '>>{Dhylan} : I Am Entitled To It! What Part of the Word Entitled Do You Not Understand?', ">>{waste-of-skin} : California? Bah! Who gives a shit about California? I think my loser supporters should stay home on Tuesday and knit and watch 'Murder, She Wrote' like they normally would *~Hillary Clinton in some interview*", '>>{WritingFromSpace} : there is no way i wont be the nominee is basically saying "nothing california does will have an effect". Though it is a clickbait title and stupid to paraphrase it instead of giving the actual quote', '>>{432526262} : More of a Saeros-type character. Jealous, entitled, and cowardly.', '>>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : She did not say that exactly. I believe what she said was: "California is a land of loser and hippies and can fuck right off. Go vote for Trump or whatever bitches." Actually this quote is also not true.', ">>{dumbchuck} : Not true! Reddit does it's best to screen out anything disparaging of Mrs. Clinton!", '>>{dumbchuck} : I was quoting the Common Dreams article. Wow--Grammar Nazis are we? Read beyond and you can see the sickening personality of this woman.', ">>{cool_hand_luke} : You didn't fall for it and called me out. Now I'm lashing out at you for asking that I have integrity. As long as it makes Hillary look bad, it should be fine, right? \\- u/dumbchuck"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{mt_weather} : Why not Debbie? Why not Donna? Why not Wolf Blitzer and Jake Tapper? Why not take over every idiot democrat who bent the knee for clinton? democrats are a mess.', ">>{wytxcook} : I support this. While they're at it, maybe one of them can ask him why his niece hasn't moved to Mexico yet.", ">>{jnr_77} : Because college campuses are literally the only place they have leverage. Colleges want your money. The DNC wants your votes and they're banking on getting them no matter how much you hate them.", ">>{topcutter} : It wasn't supposed to be this way! Sob! Whine!", '>>{americanrabbit} : These damn first amendment people exercising their rights. Now this is a first amendment resolution.', ">>{24Willard} : He has the most current influence over the party beyond Obama. Makes sense to me to protest and physically show him the progressive direction is the only direction. I'm frankly proud of the young kids taking their future seriously", '>>{mt_weather} : why does he have any influence in the party at all? his own daughter will be leaving the country because of this election. why are democrats letting him stay?', ">>{reid8470} : >At least two dozen protesters, some allied with Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter, staged a sit-in at the Washington office of Sen. Charles Schumer, next in line to lead Democrats in the Senate. Two... dozen? Oh my. Tens of thousands of people have protested against Trump's victory in Schumer's NYC and DC alone, let alone the rest of the country. But watch out, two dozen sat in an office.", '>>{yennenga} : >“Forward together, not one step back!” the young protesters chanted in unison, according to a video of the event posted on social media. Schumer has been criticized for his close ties to Wall Street and his failure to help Democrats perform better in the election. Wonder why? At least publicly, [Schumer has no worries](http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/438481/chuck-schumer-democrats-will-lose-blue-collar-whites-gain-suburbs) about his party’s dwindling fortunes among working-class white voters. “For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.”', ">>{24Willard} : Why is irrelevant. It's the case. He already signaled moving in that direction by endorsing Ellison. The Republicans are in for a long as shit 4 years", '>>{mt_weather} : lol trying to make a black muslim the butt of literally every joke. good luck kids. good luck. you\'re gonna need it all if that\'s your "master plan". thanks in advance for the stronger Green and Labor parties when the DNC finally burns itself to the ground in 4k.', ">>{24Willard} : I feel like we probably have more in common than you might think. I despise both establishment structures and the media. They created all this decisiveness. I don't have beef with you even if we have different perspectives. There are too many people in this country and we're split ideologically like we've always been. We must find balance again or violence will be the only way out for whomever is pushed into a corner. Why would anyone want that?", '>>{mt_weather} : how does that balance come, though? should we shame them for the 4 months they insulted us. should we shame them for the 15 months the mocked us. should we exile them for the 25 years that they poisoned the public discourse? how much punishment is enough to bring back a generation of voters the Clantoons and her criminal cabal worked a generation to throw out of the party? how will democrats ever be able to credibly go forward? it seems like the left is trying make the lead balloon fly again, when it should just bern it down and start a genuine labor party. if violence is not to be the answer, then exceptionally harsh self-criticism will have to take its place. the clintons must feel bern.', ">>{24Willard} : I could understand you feeling that way considering your leanings but what about the obstructionism by the right? What about the fact the Dems won the popular vote and after counting Cali will be likely 1-2 million better. Look she lost understandably because she was a dog shit candidate for the climate. But my point isn't about the leadership of the past but what we do about it now. I feel as though the left is undergoing what the right went through with the tea party when Obama won.", '>>{topcutter} : Yeah, that strategy played out beautifully for Hillary!', '>>{topcutter} : I know, Tim Kaine must have been giving a speech.'], ['>>{dumbchuck} : Clinton to California Voters: "Your Votes Will Not Affect the Democratic Primary Whatsoever"', ">>{UnburdenedAndRelaxed} : It's irresponsible to put a quote of someone saying something they did not say.", ">>{greenlife2} : Good for Hillary for telling the truth. CA doesn't count for shit.", '>>{lightninhopkins} : This isnt a quote. Common Dreams is garbage.', '>>{Davillage} : >Do you think Clinton is more of a Saruman or a Sauron? Queen Cercei', '>>{red-17} : Someone needs to explain to this site what quotation marks mean.', '>>{ThisMachineKILLS} : Why is that in quotes? She didn\'t say that. The actual quote: "I will be the nominee for my party, Chris. That is already done, in effect. There is no way that I won’t be."', '>>{Thringo} : Who is Grima Wormtongue in all of this? I would say Brock, but that assumes that Hillary is somewhat a good person.', ">>{Jordan117} : To be fair, the quotes were added by OP, and aren't in the source article. But that means it should be deleted for not being an exact copy of the headline.", ">>{greenlife2} : This. CA doesn't matter but those people there are to stupid to understand that. Why bother voting when Hillary, who a majority of people there support, has already won?", '>>{C01besaurus} : The only limit to the number of wormtongues or wormtails she has is what her darling billionaires will afford her.', '>>{Cupinacup} : Commondreams must obviously not be that common judging by how their preferred candidate is faring.', ">>{xwing_n_it} : I assumed from context it wasn't a real quote. I think it's so obviously satirical it doesn't count as deceptive.", '>>{yennenga} : My parents voted for Bernie in CA, because voting for Clinton once is enough.', '>>{red-17} : True, but even still the title is pretty pathetic.', ">>{Fractal_Soul} : There are more seats on a ballot than just the Party's Presidential Nominee. You should express yourself in your *local* politics as well-- by voting, for one thing.", '>>{gmrepublican} : Clinton was also quoted as saying "Heinrich Himmler is my hero" and "if I could charge a head tax on Puerto Ricans, I would". Like, nowhere does she say anything close to what\'s in the title. Holy clickbait.', ">>{Escapist83} : I'm not a fan of Hilary, but she didn't say those words.", ">>{remeard} : Doesn't matter, anti Hillary article. Already on its way to front page", '>>{Simoni_Deo} : Yes, Clinton is too great for the great state of California.', '>>{circlegetsthejerk} : I Take offense at this. All the beings you list have personalities. You are insulting them.', '>>{Do-u-like-fishsticks} : Obviously she didnt say that, but honestly its true. Sanders would have to win 90% or more to even close to coming to her non superdelegate number. California is pretty much irrelevant to anyone who can do math', '>>{fer_d} : Of course it does. It could actually get her to the nomination threshold without one single super delegate.', '>>{916hotdogs} : As much as I hate her, I love this. Shut those Bernie Babies down! ^^then ^^lose ^^to ^^Trump', ">>{Ovedya2011} : I think the general idea is that coming out of California she really doesn't give a shit about how Sanders does, because she believes she already has the nomination cinched up. Such confidence can be a huge mistake.", '>>{WritingFromSpace} : it isnt a quote but its an accurate paraphrasing. Though this is old news', '>>{Dhylan} : I Am Entitled To It! What Part of the Word Entitled Do You Not Understand?', ">>{waste-of-skin} : California? Bah! Who gives a shit about California? I think my loser supporters should stay home on Tuesday and knit and watch 'Murder, She Wrote' like they normally would *~Hillary Clinton in some interview*", '>>{WritingFromSpace} : there is no way i wont be the nominee is basically saying "nothing california does will have an effect". Though it is a clickbait title and stupid to paraphrase it instead of giving the actual quote', '>>{432526262} : More of a Saeros-type character. Jealous, entitled, and cowardly.', '>>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : She did not say that exactly. I believe what she said was: "California is a land of loser and hippies and can fuck right off. Go vote for Trump or whatever bitches." Actually this quote is also not true.', ">>{dumbchuck} : Not true! Reddit does it's best to screen out anything disparaging of Mrs. Clinton!", '>>{dumbchuck} : I was quoting the Common Dreams article. Wow--Grammar Nazis are we? Read beyond and you can see the sickening personality of this woman.', ">>{cool_hand_luke} : You didn't fall for it and called me out. Now I'm lashing out at you for asking that I have integrity. As long as it makes Hillary look bad, it should be fine, right? \\- u/dumbchuck"]]

classify and reply

['>>{the_rabble_alliance} : Trump spokeswoman cites first-class arm rests in groping defense. Aviation experts quickly rejected Katrina Pierson\'s "armrest trutherism."', ">>{MonsieurIneos} : Watched the video, she claims Trump couldn't have groped this female because planes available at the time didn't have armrests that couldn't go up. Which is absurd, and has already been debunked as nothing but a desperate deflection.", '>>{the_rabble_alliance} : This flimsy defense originated in /r/The_Donald. https://np.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/577sy6/trump_rape_story_debunked_jessica_leeds_claims/ It is ridiculous that the Trump campaign is relying on a subreddit to generate its talking points. It is like outsourcing your Ph.D. dissertation to a high school student.', '>>{cocoman2121} : Really hoping tomorrow, since they usually try to do things on Tuesdays and Thursdays for some reason.', '>>{frankiemughal} : thought the same, bruh! but if not tomorrow then for sure at launch of Product Red iPhone 7 on Friday. Btw from where you are?', ">>{frankiemughal} : But mostly updates come on Tuesday's and Thurday's, how you can say Friday?", '>>{Chumlee_805} : Because the new iPad and iPhone is releasing on Friday so why not release the update too :)', '>>{frankiemughal} : alright, man! you made me happy but still having doubts! xD Fingers crossed!', ">>{mysticportal} : Saturday Edit: nvm, my sources are telling me in two week. It'll be on a Tuesday. Midnight nationwide release. 10.4 betas will also be released on the same day with cool features. 2nd edit: /s", '>>{raskren} : You might be right and I hope so because I feel like we\'ve been waiting for 10.3 for forever. I\'m wondering if the Product RED iPhone 7 really requires an updated version of iOS. After all, it\'s just a cosmetic change, right? All the internal hardware is the same. Also, "iPad" is available for order on the 24th but doesn\'t arrive in stores until the following week according to the [press release](http://www.apple.com/newsroom/2017/03/new-9-7-inch-ipad-features-stunning-retina-display-and-incredible-performance.html).', '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : I guess following her logic that since armrests can be raised that he did grope her.', '>>{Skeuomorphic_} : Most likely Product Red iPhones are already on 10.3 and they will release the update on the same day it launches', '>>{Wrym} : > a [special needs] high school student.', '>>{MonsieurIneos} : She just deflects to things about Bill Clinton anytime she gets cornered lol.', '>>{drsjsmith} : Well, it wouldn\'t have been absurd if it were true that armrests didn\'t go up in first-class in that era. However, because armrests *did* go up in first-class then, Katrina Pierson has taken a huge hit to her credibility on this issue (not that she was widely believed to be credible about any issues before.) The next time she offers a defense of Trump in the Jessica Leeds case, the rejoinder from an anchor, commentator, or at the very least a Clinton surrogate should be "You tried to tell us that this was impossible because that armrest couldn\'t move, but after checking, it turns out that the armrest *could* move. Why should we believe you now?"', '>>{rodog62} : Sorry for not knowing the answer to this but what is new in the 10.3 update?', '>>{drebux} : Sweet. Been on 10.3 for awhile now with the betas. No issues on my device. Yet. I always say a little prayer when updating the betas haha', ">>{mysticportal} : My comment was a joke. Better to wait for the releases then be disappointed by rumored dates. But, yeah, I agree with you. All the betas have been a nice experience. This current one is really smooth on all fronts and the battery life is amazing. The final version is gonna be great for everyone. Shortly after we'll start again with the next version's betas!", ">>{whitemest} : Such inept surrogates. **Bill Clinton isn't running for president**. If hillary was grabbing men by the dick or women by the pussy it would work, but this false equivalence shit is so weak a 5th grader can see the difference.", '>>{Noctew} : They have to...or another 10.2 point update. The 🍎Watch has always had color options for the faces which match the bands they sell - and they have new band colors available now which are not in 10.2 or even 10.3 beta', ">>{antisect} : Really hope it's not tomorrow, it's buggy as fuck and still needs lots of work", '>>{MonsieurIneos} : I love when they say "What Trump said was 10 and 15 years ago! Can\'t we talk about something more relevant like about what Bill Clinton did in the 90\'s!?"', '>>{RadBadTad} : That\'s pretty much how the entire Trump campaign is running. It\'s a bunch of bros who think with their guts sitting in a room propping each other up. One guy says something that sort of seems like it might be right, and rather than Google it, or call someone to verify, the whole room is so cocky and self confident that they decide "Well, it makes sense to me, so it\'s right" and they then leave the room to go talk about it.', '>>{frankiemughal} : Fingers crossed! Tomorrow is the day but still who knows?', '>>{throbo} : Sounds like she loves that movie "My Cousin Vinny" and tried to be Marisa Tomei. The planes\' arm rests at that time did not have positraction that would enable them to lift.', '>>{WOVigilant} : Have you seen my armrest?, Warren.', ">>{frankiemughal} : Apple's new file system which will give a boost to performance and stability!", '>>{WOVigilant} : Has there ever been a worse political spokesman than Katrina Pierson? Ever?', ">>{frankiemughal} : APFS is basically upgrade over very old file system of Apple! i don't know much about all this so better google it!", '>>{deaconstevew} : I am guessing Monday or Tuesday of next week.', ">>{Sidwill} : How in the he'll does she still have a job? Can any Trump supporters explain to me how this person ever got hired as a spokesperson given her history and how she keeps the job given her performance?", '>>{mlage34} : If rather it be a subreddit than the progaganda arm of the Kremlin.', '>>{vrgr23} : >“Katrina, do you think that that’s fair?” asked CNN host Don Lemon. **"Because people will say the same thing about you, that you’re supporting Donald Trump for fifteen minutes of fame.”** Ouch.', '>>{RidleyScotch} : More likely middle school students from a different country.', ">>{keldorr92} : We're in the last couple weeks of a presidential campaign and were discussing first class armrests in the context of one of the nominees potentially being a serial rapist. This is why democracy doesn't work unless you have a well informed electorate.", '>>{xjayroox} : Middle school students who *should* be in high school but were held back multiple years', '>>{xjayroox} : I think the most surprising part of the article is that CNN keeps an "aviation editor" on retainer', '>>{xjayroox} : There probably were. The distinction is they were shit canned after their first piss poor performance while the Trump campaign has kept her shit show going for almost a year', '>>{unknownpoltroon} : I think shes doing a great job, considering what she has to work with.', ">>{spedo09} : That should be the GOP's new slogan: Alt-Reality. Alt-Wrong. Alt-Right.", '>>{AnthonyGonzalez27780} : Add that thread to the "We did it Reddit!" collection.', ">>{apt1i} : So... as someone who hates the Orange Asshat with a passion, I still feel like I should point this out as bad reasoning. I mean, in all fairness, even though Bill isn't running for president, he IS going to be First Gentleman. If he was indeed a serial rapist like the Trumpeters say, having him in the Whitehouse would be a bad thing. And well... given that he has a very prominent history with it... it seems like just excusing it because he isn't running for president isn't productive. Instead, I would argue that we should focus on the fact that he's never actually been found guilty of rape. He's been accused, sure, but that's a far cry from what the right wingers would have us believe. Cut off their argument at the knees.", ">>{ShittinPretty} : She's a woman, and she's willing to go on television defending Donald Trump. I don't think they have too many alternates lining up to take her place. Donald only hires the best people, after all.", ">>{viva_la_vinyl} : The smart ones left long ago or never approached the Trumpster fire to begin with. Conway was semi decent for a while but this week, she's completely fallen apart.", '>>{Evillurkshady} : It still would be a distraction. People misremember details like that all the time, particularly in times of stress, and the misremembered details become reinforced over time as we reflect back. I watched 9/11 from my office window, and my coworker ran in and said "Did you see that? That plane was pitch black, with no markings!" That was wrong, but it doesn\'t mean he didn\'t see a plane hit a building.', ">>{vmp99} : The point is the woman is lying. She said he raised the armrest and groped her, but they didn't raise in first class in the 80s.", '>>{superdago} : So I was thinking about the theory that Trump is running to spite Obama after the Correspondents Dinner public execution, but Obama also laid into CNN. Apparently CNN took that as a sign to get better, and Trump... not so much.', ">>{MonsieurIneos} : Except that they did. Even on aircraft from the 70's they did. That's the point of the article.", '>>{007meow} : I don\'t know what caused them all to flip the switch, but they are just not putting up with their shit anymore. Carol Costello just said fuck it and cut an interview off with Katrina Pierson on live TV yesterday because "it wasn\'t going anywhere."', '>>{Kitten_of_Death} : I swear Trump supporters are total spheroids, they always miss the point.', ">>{vmp99} : It only says 3 airlines had them out of all the airlines from back then. Don't you think this woman would give more details to solidify her claims, maybe have a witness come out since it happened in front of a cabin full of people? Or give the airline, flight number, or destination? Why even come out of the woodworks 30 YEARS LATER? Why not cash in on the rich billionaire that apparently groped you in front of a plane full of people? Dude had his own private jet back then anyways. Obvious hit job.", '>>{MonsieurIneos} : Once their minds are made up, any evidence, videos, polls, stories, accusations etc are immediately media bias and lies. I was having fun with this, but now I really want November 8 to come and go so the level of crazy can go back down to a somewhat manageable level.', '>>{MonsieurIneos} : Yes, sexual assault victims always come forward immediately against rich and famous people who have unlimited resources and influence. Especially in the 80s, when women were always believed over men for stuff like this, and never shamed. They must just be doing it now for the thrills. Same with the Bill Cosby allegations, totally unfounded because the length of time that has passed right? Also could you give such specific details (flight information, make/model of plane, flight number) from that many years ago?', '>>{Iwkyawy} : I know this is a wildly unpopular opinion but I think this entire election is a testament to the stupidity of primaries. Have party leadership vet and pick candidates internally.', '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : Anyone crazy enough to believe Katrina Pierson should be locked up for their own safety, and the safety of others.', ">>{vmp99} : Well like I said, if it really happened in a plane cabin full of people there would definitely be a witness considering a high profile person would be committing such an act. So this mans unlimited resources would mean nothing in a court of law. You're comparing groping to drugging and raping....one seems a lot more traumatic and likely to cause someone to keep quiet about what has taken place. Check this out too, interesting isn't it? http://i.imgur.com/WFTKNUR.jpg", ">>{NeverDrumpf2016} : To be fair to Trump, it's not like he has a long line of qualified people willing to defend him. I mean look at Kellyanne, she seems pretty down to earth, but her credibility is utterly useless now with all the stupidity she's had to spit to defend the indefensible.", ">>{SociallyStandard} : I wouldn't call that an unpopular opinion. It'd work even better with multiple parties, provided all nominees would be invited to debates. I don't like Stein or Johnson, but excluding them from the debates is counter to democracy.", '>>{photenth} : So I can literally create a second account, shitpost obviously wrong information, make it look like real stuff and see stupid people repeat it on national TV?', ">>{whitemest} : Comes down to this; Do you wanna vote for the man *accused* of rape and says other deplorable shit daily, or vote for the woman who *defended* a man accused of shit (bill) into the office. Remember, again, despite bills actions he's not runnIng. Let's not attach his woman to him for his actions.", '>>{whitemest} : I always chuckle at that...then shake my head none of the journalists bring that up. God forbid you stop them on their soapbox for a minute, then may never come back!', '>>{WOVigilant} : Poor thing. She has nothing to work with. The circle tightens every day.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{cocoman2121} : Really hoping tomorrow, since they usually try to do things on Tuesdays and Thursdays for some reason.', '>>{frankiemughal} : thought the same, bruh! but if not tomorrow then for sure at launch of Product Red iPhone 7 on Friday. Btw from where you are?', ">>{frankiemughal} : But mostly updates come on Tuesday's and Thurday's, how you can say Friday?", '>>{Chumlee_805} : Because the new iPad and iPhone is releasing on Friday so why not release the update too :)', '>>{frankiemughal} : alright, man! you made me happy but still having doubts! xD Fingers crossed!', ">>{mysticportal} : Saturday Edit: nvm, my sources are telling me in two week. It'll be on a Tuesday. Midnight nationwide release. 10.4 betas will also be released on the same day with cool features. 2nd edit: /s", '>>{raskren} : You might be right and I hope so because I feel like we\'ve been waiting for 10.3 for forever. I\'m wondering if the Product RED iPhone 7 really requires an updated version of iOS. After all, it\'s just a cosmetic change, right? All the internal hardware is the same. Also, "iPad" is available for order on the 24th but doesn\'t arrive in stores until the following week according to the [press release](http://www.apple.com/newsroom/2017/03/new-9-7-inch-ipad-features-stunning-retina-display-and-incredible-performance.html).', '>>{Skeuomorphic_} : Most likely Product Red iPhones are already on 10.3 and they will release the update on the same day it launches', '>>{rodog62} : Sorry for not knowing the answer to this but what is new in the 10.3 update?', '>>{drebux} : Sweet. Been on 10.3 for awhile now with the betas. No issues on my device. Yet. I always say a little prayer when updating the betas haha', ">>{mysticportal} : My comment was a joke. Better to wait for the releases then be disappointed by rumored dates. But, yeah, I agree with you. All the betas have been a nice experience. This current one is really smooth on all fronts and the battery life is amazing. The final version is gonna be great for everyone. Shortly after we'll start again with the next version's betas!", '>>{Noctew} : They have to...or another 10.2 point update. The 🍎Watch has always had color options for the faces which match the bands they sell - and they have new band colors available now which are not in 10.2 or even 10.3 beta', ">>{antisect} : Really hope it's not tomorrow, it's buggy as fuck and still needs lots of work", '>>{frankiemughal} : Fingers crossed! Tomorrow is the day but still who knows?', ">>{frankiemughal} : Apple's new file system which will give a boost to performance and stability!", ">>{frankiemughal} : APFS is basically upgrade over very old file system of Apple! i don't know much about all this so better google it!", '>>{deaconstevew} : I am guessing Monday or Tuesday of next week.'], ['>>{the_rabble_alliance} : Trump spokeswoman cites first-class arm rests in groping defense. Aviation experts quickly rejected Katrina Pierson\'s "armrest trutherism."', ">>{MonsieurIneos} : Watched the video, she claims Trump couldn't have groped this female because planes available at the time didn't have armrests that couldn't go up. Which is absurd, and has already been debunked as nothing but a desperate deflection.", '>>{the_rabble_alliance} : This flimsy defense originated in /r/The_Donald. https://np.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/577sy6/trump_rape_story_debunked_jessica_leeds_claims/ It is ridiculous that the Trump campaign is relying on a subreddit to generate its talking points. It is like outsourcing your Ph.D. dissertation to a high school student.', '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : I guess following her logic that since armrests can be raised that he did grope her.', '>>{Wrym} : > a [special needs] high school student.', '>>{MonsieurIneos} : She just deflects to things about Bill Clinton anytime she gets cornered lol.', '>>{drsjsmith} : Well, it wouldn\'t have been absurd if it were true that armrests didn\'t go up in first-class in that era. However, because armrests *did* go up in first-class then, Katrina Pierson has taken a huge hit to her credibility on this issue (not that she was widely believed to be credible about any issues before.) The next time she offers a defense of Trump in the Jessica Leeds case, the rejoinder from an anchor, commentator, or at the very least a Clinton surrogate should be "You tried to tell us that this was impossible because that armrest couldn\'t move, but after checking, it turns out that the armrest *could* move. Why should we believe you now?"', ">>{whitemest} : Such inept surrogates. **Bill Clinton isn't running for president**. If hillary was grabbing men by the dick or women by the pussy it would work, but this false equivalence shit is so weak a 5th grader can see the difference.", '>>{MonsieurIneos} : I love when they say "What Trump said was 10 and 15 years ago! Can\'t we talk about something more relevant like about what Bill Clinton did in the 90\'s!?"', '>>{RadBadTad} : That\'s pretty much how the entire Trump campaign is running. It\'s a bunch of bros who think with their guts sitting in a room propping each other up. One guy says something that sort of seems like it might be right, and rather than Google it, or call someone to verify, the whole room is so cocky and self confident that they decide "Well, it makes sense to me, so it\'s right" and they then leave the room to go talk about it.', '>>{throbo} : Sounds like she loves that movie "My Cousin Vinny" and tried to be Marisa Tomei. The planes\' arm rests at that time did not have positraction that would enable them to lift.', '>>{WOVigilant} : Have you seen my armrest?, Warren.', '>>{WOVigilant} : Has there ever been a worse political spokesman than Katrina Pierson? Ever?', ">>{Sidwill} : How in the he'll does she still have a job? Can any Trump supporters explain to me how this person ever got hired as a spokesperson given her history and how she keeps the job given her performance?", '>>{mlage34} : If rather it be a subreddit than the progaganda arm of the Kremlin.', '>>{vrgr23} : >“Katrina, do you think that that’s fair?” asked CNN host Don Lemon. **"Because people will say the same thing about you, that you’re supporting Donald Trump for fifteen minutes of fame.”** Ouch.', '>>{RidleyScotch} : More likely middle school students from a different country.', ">>{keldorr92} : We're in the last couple weeks of a presidential campaign and were discussing first class armrests in the context of one of the nominees potentially being a serial rapist. This is why democracy doesn't work unless you have a well informed electorate.", '>>{xjayroox} : Middle school students who *should* be in high school but were held back multiple years', '>>{xjayroox} : I think the most surprising part of the article is that CNN keeps an "aviation editor" on retainer', '>>{xjayroox} : There probably were. The distinction is they were shit canned after their first piss poor performance while the Trump campaign has kept her shit show going for almost a year', '>>{unknownpoltroon} : I think shes doing a great job, considering what she has to work with.', ">>{spedo09} : That should be the GOP's new slogan: Alt-Reality. Alt-Wrong. Alt-Right.", '>>{AnthonyGonzalez27780} : Add that thread to the "We did it Reddit!" collection.', ">>{apt1i} : So... as someone who hates the Orange Asshat with a passion, I still feel like I should point this out as bad reasoning. I mean, in all fairness, even though Bill isn't running for president, he IS going to be First Gentleman. If he was indeed a serial rapist like the Trumpeters say, having him in the Whitehouse would be a bad thing. And well... given that he has a very prominent history with it... it seems like just excusing it because he isn't running for president isn't productive. Instead, I would argue that we should focus on the fact that he's never actually been found guilty of rape. He's been accused, sure, but that's a far cry from what the right wingers would have us believe. Cut off their argument at the knees.", ">>{ShittinPretty} : She's a woman, and she's willing to go on television defending Donald Trump. I don't think they have too many alternates lining up to take her place. Donald only hires the best people, after all.", ">>{viva_la_vinyl} : The smart ones left long ago or never approached the Trumpster fire to begin with. Conway was semi decent for a while but this week, she's completely fallen apart.", '>>{Evillurkshady} : It still would be a distraction. People misremember details like that all the time, particularly in times of stress, and the misremembered details become reinforced over time as we reflect back. I watched 9/11 from my office window, and my coworker ran in and said "Did you see that? That plane was pitch black, with no markings!" That was wrong, but it doesn\'t mean he didn\'t see a plane hit a building.', ">>{vmp99} : The point is the woman is lying. She said he raised the armrest and groped her, but they didn't raise in first class in the 80s.", '>>{superdago} : So I was thinking about the theory that Trump is running to spite Obama after the Correspondents Dinner public execution, but Obama also laid into CNN. Apparently CNN took that as a sign to get better, and Trump... not so much.', ">>{MonsieurIneos} : Except that they did. Even on aircraft from the 70's they did. That's the point of the article.", '>>{007meow} : I don\'t know what caused them all to flip the switch, but they are just not putting up with their shit anymore. Carol Costello just said fuck it and cut an interview off with Katrina Pierson on live TV yesterday because "it wasn\'t going anywhere."', '>>{Kitten_of_Death} : I swear Trump supporters are total spheroids, they always miss the point.', ">>{vmp99} : It only says 3 airlines had them out of all the airlines from back then. Don't you think this woman would give more details to solidify her claims, maybe have a witness come out since it happened in front of a cabin full of people? Or give the airline, flight number, or destination? Why even come out of the woodworks 30 YEARS LATER? Why not cash in on the rich billionaire that apparently groped you in front of a plane full of people? Dude had his own private jet back then anyways. Obvious hit job.", '>>{MonsieurIneos} : Once their minds are made up, any evidence, videos, polls, stories, accusations etc are immediately media bias and lies. I was having fun with this, but now I really want November 8 to come and go so the level of crazy can go back down to a somewhat manageable level.', '>>{MonsieurIneos} : Yes, sexual assault victims always come forward immediately against rich and famous people who have unlimited resources and influence. Especially in the 80s, when women were always believed over men for stuff like this, and never shamed. They must just be doing it now for the thrills. Same with the Bill Cosby allegations, totally unfounded because the length of time that has passed right? Also could you give such specific details (flight information, make/model of plane, flight number) from that many years ago?', '>>{Iwkyawy} : I know this is a wildly unpopular opinion but I think this entire election is a testament to the stupidity of primaries. Have party leadership vet and pick candidates internally.', '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : Anyone crazy enough to believe Katrina Pierson should be locked up for their own safety, and the safety of others.', ">>{vmp99} : Well like I said, if it really happened in a plane cabin full of people there would definitely be a witness considering a high profile person would be committing such an act. So this mans unlimited resources would mean nothing in a court of law. You're comparing groping to drugging and raping....one seems a lot more traumatic and likely to cause someone to keep quiet about what has taken place. Check this out too, interesting isn't it? http://i.imgur.com/WFTKNUR.jpg", ">>{NeverDrumpf2016} : To be fair to Trump, it's not like he has a long line of qualified people willing to defend him. I mean look at Kellyanne, she seems pretty down to earth, but her credibility is utterly useless now with all the stupidity she's had to spit to defend the indefensible.", ">>{SociallyStandard} : I wouldn't call that an unpopular opinion. It'd work even better with multiple parties, provided all nominees would be invited to debates. I don't like Stein or Johnson, but excluding them from the debates is counter to democracy.", '>>{photenth} : So I can literally create a second account, shitpost obviously wrong information, make it look like real stuff and see stupid people repeat it on national TV?', ">>{whitemest} : Comes down to this; Do you wanna vote for the man *accused* of rape and says other deplorable shit daily, or vote for the woman who *defended* a man accused of shit (bill) into the office. Remember, again, despite bills actions he's not runnIng. Let's not attach his woman to him for his actions.", '>>{whitemest} : I always chuckle at that...then shake my head none of the journalists bring that up. God forbid you stop them on their soapbox for a minute, then may never come back!', '>>{WOVigilant} : Poor thing. She has nothing to work with. The circle tightens every day.']]

classify and reply

['>>{3rdandalot} : Trump’s dramatic U-turn on air strikes in Syria ‘was sparked by daughter Ivanka’s heartbreak after gas attack’', '>>{10390} : Maybe she could talk to him about the Flint children.', '>>{terriblejoshua} : George Takei Takes Aim At Donald Drumpf Over FBI Russia Probe', ">>{lacronicus} : Because the people that do that are dumb, and we should try to be better than that. If that's what you're going for, by all means continue, but accept the fact that you're making the world a worse place for it.", '>>{SaltHash} : Donnie is looking for trouble by proclaiming he can solve the problem on Twitter.', '>>{itsmegeorge} : [Discussion] Do you think the 7S could come with the A10?', '>>{beermile} : What an unnecessary and dumb way to make an article submission invalid', '>>{RepelGropers} : Daddy wanted to impress his little Princess at taxpayer expense.', ">>{terriblejoshua} : I have the addon. Didn't even notice that.", ">>{itsmegeorge} : This is what I'm thinking too, because if they don't use two new chips, there's not even a reason to release the 7S; just keep the 7. On the other hand, I don't know if they would use two new chips.", ">>{shapeshiftingrobot} : >because if they don't use two new chips, there's not even a reason to release a 7S Whaaat? For starters, there isn't even any software that fully uses the A10. More power would be nice, but it's pointless unless the new chip can use less energy. Second, while the S models have typically meant a speed boost in the early iPhones, it's also when new features come out. The 3GS had the video camera, the 4S had Siri, the 5S had Touch ID, and the 6S had 3D Touch.", '>>{DirectTheCheckered} : I alone can fix it. Oldest scam in the book.', ">>{MFAWG} : Seriously? We're running an entire country on some sheltered twenty something's feels? Really?", '>>{pizzashill} : Holy shit dude, imagine if Clinton had ordered this attack and it came out Chelsea Clinton had some part in it, the right wing rage machine would go into hyperdrive. Then again - imagine if Obamas wife was an illegal immigrant that lied about going to college and came from a communist country.', '>>{1461DaysInHell} : He will kill thousands, and weaken the U.S. Big daddy putin will be so proud.', ">>{TinyBaron} : He's the one looking for trouble. Both in the Middle East and in Korea. So much for America First.", ">>{itsmegeorge} : Oh that's good thinking. I guess you're right, also seeing the S models have had bigger longevity in general. I am only asking, because I was thinking of getting an iPhone 7 but I was thinking of waiting for the 7S and the 8.", ">>{FissureKing} : Well that's not in any way terrifying. /s", ">>{dagwood222} : There used to be a popular Christian poster listing all the names and titles Jesus had used; 'Prince of Peace,' 'The Lamb,' 'The Shepard,' 'King of Kings'... I can imagine the same thing for Donnie; 'The Cheet-O,' 'Drumpf,' 'Tiny Hands,' 'Ivanka's Pervy Dad,' 'The Thinskinned Orange Monkey'...", ">>{popname} : At least Reddit's racists are staying consistent on their racist use of a person's ancestors' name as an attack. The racist editorialization of this link's title is not OK. But, I guess if your going to link to a racist web site you might as well demonstrate your own racism.", '>>{LucienLibrarian} : This is why I always responded to stories about royals with "Fuck the queen" and the like. We fought a war to keep this shit off our shores forever. Now its the rabid flag-wavers that are bowing before la princessa.', '>>{popname} : I get how a racist like the one who posted the racist attack in the editorialized title of this link might assume the person they hate is white. But why would you make the same racist assumption? Or is the obvious answer the correct answer?', ">>{TrumpImpeachedInJuly} : Healthcare and tax reform failures. They got the SC robbery they coveted. Trump's mental incapability is now threatening broad war. I think it's about time the GOP realizes they got what they could out of the useful idiot and allow impeachment proceedings to take form.", '>>{Scoutandabout} : Mr. Draft-Dodger certainly is generous with the lives of OTHER American citizens.', '>>{AreWeNotDoinPhrasing} : This late in the game I’d definitely wait. I got the 7 from the 6s+ about 3 months after release and even I wished I had waited lol.', '>>{jugenbund} : George is just making me cringe at this point.', ">>{terriblejoshua} : You don't have to be white to be a white supremacist. But I can see why you might think that.", ">>{itsmegeorge} : You think? This is exactly what I wanna do - I wanna get the 7 but it's already been like 6-7 months since it got out and I don't wanna regret it when the new ones come out. On the other hand I have a 5 and it's unbearably slow. :(", ">>{popname} : I guess you're right. Just because you're making a racist defense for a Europhobic racist doesn't preclude uou from being of European descent. Of far more interest is the fact that you call me a white supremacist for acknowledging the racist attack in this post's editorialized title. It's always a hoot to see racists defend racists by calling rational people racist.", ">>{terriblejoshua} : Dude, no one gives a shit about Trump or your argument. Trump's a traitor and should die in prison. Fuck Trump and his weird little supporters like yourself.", ">>{GeneGrantham} : Tough words for a man who dodged the draft. I guess it's okay for others to die, but not you, right DJ?", ">>{Fendahl_core} : It's possible, but I think they'd have to do *something* to increase performance. I could see them bumping up the clock speed or making some other modifications to the A10, similar to the way they do for the iPad models (i.e. A9 for the phone, vs. A9X for iPad). The iPad Pro revision is expected to get an A10X from what I've read (they have A9X currently). Maybe the 7S models will get that as well, or some variant of it designed to use a little less energy. The rumors of a simultaneous release of 7S and 8 models seem pretty pervasive, so I'm *inclined* to believe them. But it would be a total departure from the way Apple has always done things before. It's uncommon for Apple to make any bold changes like that, but it's definitely possible. Offering two sizes of iPhone was a big change for example. It's hard to say how they'd handle the processors since 7S & 8 release at the same time is unprecedented, but I can't imagine a 7S that doesn't have a meaningful performance boost over the 7. I'm hoping that Apple either offers OLED screens across the board or they don't price the 8 into the stratosphere. I miss having an OLED screen. If Apple delivers that OLED *and* a true dark mode in this new phones I will be very happy.", '>>{JeremyMo88} : He really is Future Biff from the Back to the Future movie.', '>>{popname} : Wow! You\'re more sensitive than most racist snowflakes. Take a deep breath, find your safe place, and commiserate with your racist friends over coloring books and stuffed animals. And most importantly, keep chanting "This too will pass when we implement our final solution. This too will pass when we implement our final solution...." Good afternoon and good luck.', ">>{Fendahl_core} : > More power would be nice, but it's pointless unless the new chip can use less energy. I can't recall a time when Apple has ever launched a new iPhone model that didn't have a faster SoC than the one it replaced. Generally these chips get more efficient too, i.e. deliver more performance with the same energy or less. I don't see Apple breaking that trend by launching a 7S with the same A10 that's in the 7. It doesn't make sense. People expect a meaningful performance bump *and* some new features otherwise why would anyone upgrade? To get a red iPhone? Nah.", ">>{shapeshiftingrobot} : I don't disagree with you, but historically, the S line exists because people have staggered upgrade cycles. Apple certainly doesn't expect every apple user to upgrade every year, but certainly wants those upgrading on any year to be able to have something new to upgrade to. So a marginal performance bump wouldn't be out of line if the device had some other major feature, like an improved camera, wireless charging, or any of the other rumored features.", '>>{Fendahl_core} : > S models have had bigger longevity in general. This is why I always buy the S models. I also like the fact that it\'s given Apple more time to work the bugs out of the design. i.e. The 6S+ got a stronger chassis with a higher grade of aluminum to avoid bending. The S models have typically felt "just right" to me. If these rumors of a simultaneous 7S & 8 launch are true though it will give me something to think about. There are some features being teased that I have been waiting a long time for. OLED is a big one. So is a real change in the design. I liked the 5/5S design a lot. I\'m not as big a fan of the 6/6s/7 slippery bar of soap design. If the 8 is significantly different in design and it\'s a big improvement, I could see myself breaking my rule there and going for the 8.', '>>{_personofdisinterest} : JFC pure propaganda for maximum feels. What a load of horse shit. She can start being heartbroken about American kids anytime now.', ">>{Danny2lok} : With any other nation, this level of juvenile conduct would just be horrifically embarrassing. With NK, this level of school yard, juvenile conduct will likely end in a response that none of us would like. Taking away this man-child's twitter is now a national security issue.", ">>{Fendahl_core} : That makes sense. It seems like the typical performance bump is roughly 30-60% between generations. Maybe the 7S models will be on the low end of that and the 8 will be on the high end. My point was just that I don't see them releasing a 7S without a measurable bump in performance. That would be unprecedented. As good a job as Apple has done at keeping it's customers from focusing on clock speed and processor cores etc, they still want and expect an increase in overall performance with every new version, S or otherwise IMO.", ">>{eightdx} : Fuck man, don't sign that shit USA. We don't all want to start shit.", '>>{UnsubstantiatedClaim} : I read it more like he was trying to start a U.S.A chant. U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.!', ">>{Icouldbeanyone} : What is that I saw earlier. Oh yeah... IT IS AMERICA FIRST HE'S PREVENTING NORTH KOREA FROM SELLING NUKES TO ISIS AND HAVING THEM SMUGGLE THEM INTO THE UNITED STATES AND DETONATING THEM!!! That's what I've been reading today.", '>>{communitycirclejerk} : The Sun is not actually very reputable news source so unless other outlets report it consider it fake.', '>>{JacobCrim88} : [Donald loves his fake patriotism](http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/43/980x588/gallery-1477863987-gettyimages-539414732.jpg)', '>>{morbidexpression} : and refused the honor of living in the White House at huge taxpayer expense!', '>>{iwantttopettthekitty} : For a reason, amirite? That shit works.', '>>{geniebear} : The WH said retaliating against the chemical warfare was only greenlit to protect our national interest ELI5 how bombing some minor airfield, without targeting the chemical weapon stores or doing any real damage, does that?', '>>{nzodd} : You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect North Korea to distracting Americans from my treasonous interactions with Russia. -- Trump, 2 years from now', ">>{ScienceisMagic} : Rabid anti-trumper; I think this was the correct reaction to the use of chemical weapons here; I wish Congress backed it in 2013, but here we are. It's a message that there are consequences to the use of chemical weapons. If we let, or continue to let, the use of chemical weapons go unchecked, our share of the balance of power is diminished. Our conventional weapons systems are unmatched, if chemical and biological weapon use becomes more common place they would be able to compete with our conventional weapons systems. We also need to uphold our standing, or at least project to uphold our standing, as morally superior to these lesser states who lack our military abilities.", ">>{Yoru_no_Majo} : To be fair, I think I'd rather Ivanka be running it than Bannon, Pence, or Trump.", ">>{hollaback_girl} : Only if we believe this propaganda. Which we shouldn't. Not for a second. But imagine how bad the real story must be if their sympathy-gathering/humanizing spin is that Trump is making huge national security decisions based on his daughter's (who, again, has no business being in the White House in the first place) emotional appeals.", '>>{ScienceisMagic} : Perhaps NK will not stoop lower and thus all diplomacy with NK is elevated. Like they\'ll see the tweet and be like "Wait, is this how we come across to the rest of the world?" Or they\'re jealous of the provocative, juvenile twitter game. Give mad respect for "looking for trouble line." Sit down for diplomatic relations. Or see these sad tweets as a reflection of themselves. Realize they need to do better, no they will do better. Become open society. /s', '>>{FissureKing} : Just the idea about how little thought Trump put into it and how easily swayed he is. The attack was reactionary and poorly planned.', '>>{ColePhelps-} : NO. He does NOT speak for me. Can this be grounds for impeachment?', '>>{MBAMBA0} : Her heartbreak over the possibility of her daddy being found guilty of colluding with Putin and having to resign as President.', '>>{murcanno} : Yeah the alt right would probably lose their shit! Oh wait they did anyway', ">>{RepelGropers} : It's OK to bomb them though. Just don't gas them.", '>>{Crazy_Mastermind} : Do not underestimate the ability of a war to bolster approval ratings. Soon it will once again be "unpatriotic" to question the president during times of war.', '>>{strangeelement} : Nah this is a double standard. Democrats would be pretty mad at this if it was reversed, just not rabidly. Republicans are absolutely fine with nepotism, somehow, in a way that Democrats never would.', ">>{ItchyThunder} : Before everyone starts to worry: this message was carefully crafted by the experts in diplomacy and foreign policy that were able to wrangle the phone from Trump's hands. Trump was subdued but was not harmed. He is resting on the floor in one of the WH bathrooms.", '>>{preserved_fish} : Wait a day or two and the Daily Caller and HuffPo will run articles that make this counterfactual dream piece a reality.', ">>{pizzashill} : There are 2 types of whataboutism. The fallacious kind and the non-fallacious kind. When used to expose double standards or hypocrisy it isn't fallacious.", ">>{thorax509} : so, candidate trump keeps bring up Obama's birth certificate but won't divulge his tax returns.. what kind of whataboutism is that? If i'm whatabouting about trump's whatabouting, where does that put me? jesus, this is getting complicated... whataboutismception???", '>>{pillbuggery} : Oh good, two fat little golden boys wagging their dicks at each other. This is fucking embarrassing.', ">>{TotesNottaBot} : Yeah sorry, none of that is currently possible with the TrumpCo/Russia love affair playing in the background. Each little episode we see every week is a thread that leads back to TrumpCo/Russia. What that strike did (just talking about my, a tax paying voter, perception of the events as they've unfolded) was prove that Trump would order a military strike if he thought it would give him political cover.", ">>{onehandsomegamer} : I mean yeah, if you're ok with the US acting impulsively in a unilateral manner to start a war that will cause innocent casualties in collateral, then yeah we should all support it. Quit acting like we have any authority or moral high ground to start a damn war.", '>>{ScienceisMagic} : >start a war that will cause innocent casualties in collateral Could argue that lack of action in [2013](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/04/11/daily-202-reflexive-partisanship-drives-polling-lurch-on-syria-strikes/58ec27d4e9b69b3a72331e6e/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_diplo-9a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&tid=a_inl&utm_term=.1c8806c0b538) caused 500K Syrian deaths so far.', '>>{llllIlllIllIlI} : It\'s official. America can no longer look at tin-pot dictators and banana republics and all sorts of strongmen throughout history and laugh and say "never us." Or get confused about "good Germans." (No, I\'m not saying he\'s even close to Adolf. Just comparing mass movements that we have historically sneered at.)']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{3rdandalot} : Trump’s dramatic U-turn on air strikes in Syria ‘was sparked by daughter Ivanka’s heartbreak after gas attack’', '>>{10390} : Maybe she could talk to him about the Flint children.', '>>{RepelGropers} : Daddy wanted to impress his little Princess at taxpayer expense.', ">>{MFAWG} : Seriously? We're running an entire country on some sheltered twenty something's feels? Really?", '>>{pizzashill} : Holy shit dude, imagine if Clinton had ordered this attack and it came out Chelsea Clinton had some part in it, the right wing rage machine would go into hyperdrive. Then again - imagine if Obamas wife was an illegal immigrant that lied about going to college and came from a communist country.', ">>{FissureKing} : Well that's not in any way terrifying. /s", '>>{LucienLibrarian} : This is why I always responded to stories about royals with "Fuck the queen" and the like. We fought a war to keep this shit off our shores forever. Now its the rabid flag-wavers that are bowing before la princessa.', '>>{_personofdisinterest} : JFC pure propaganda for maximum feels. What a load of horse shit. She can start being heartbroken about American kids anytime now.', '>>{communitycirclejerk} : The Sun is not actually very reputable news source so unless other outlets report it consider it fake.', '>>{morbidexpression} : and refused the honor of living in the White House at huge taxpayer expense!', ">>{Yoru_no_Majo} : To be fair, I think I'd rather Ivanka be running it than Bannon, Pence, or Trump.", ">>{hollaback_girl} : Only if we believe this propaganda. Which we shouldn't. Not for a second. But imagine how bad the real story must be if their sympathy-gathering/humanizing spin is that Trump is making huge national security decisions based on his daughter's (who, again, has no business being in the White House in the first place) emotional appeals.", '>>{FissureKing} : Just the idea about how little thought Trump put into it and how easily swayed he is. The attack was reactionary and poorly planned.', '>>{MBAMBA0} : Her heartbreak over the possibility of her daddy being found guilty of colluding with Putin and having to resign as President.', '>>{murcanno} : Yeah the alt right would probably lose their shit! Oh wait they did anyway', ">>{RepelGropers} : It's OK to bomb them though. Just don't gas them.", '>>{strangeelement} : Nah this is a double standard. Democrats would be pretty mad at this if it was reversed, just not rabidly. Republicans are absolutely fine with nepotism, somehow, in a way that Democrats never would.', '>>{preserved_fish} : Wait a day or two and the Daily Caller and HuffPo will run articles that make this counterfactual dream piece a reality.', ">>{pizzashill} : There are 2 types of whataboutism. The fallacious kind and the non-fallacious kind. When used to expose double standards or hypocrisy it isn't fallacious.", ">>{thorax509} : so, candidate trump keeps bring up Obama's birth certificate but won't divulge his tax returns.. what kind of whataboutism is that? If i'm whatabouting about trump's whatabouting, where does that put me? jesus, this is getting complicated... whataboutismception???"], ['>>{itsmegeorge} : [Discussion] Do you think the 7S could come with the A10?', ">>{itsmegeorge} : This is what I'm thinking too, because if they don't use two new chips, there's not even a reason to release the 7S; just keep the 7. On the other hand, I don't know if they would use two new chips.", ">>{shapeshiftingrobot} : >because if they don't use two new chips, there's not even a reason to release a 7S Whaaat? For starters, there isn't even any software that fully uses the A10. More power would be nice, but it's pointless unless the new chip can use less energy. Second, while the S models have typically meant a speed boost in the early iPhones, it's also when new features come out. The 3GS had the video camera, the 4S had Siri, the 5S had Touch ID, and the 6S had 3D Touch.", ">>{itsmegeorge} : Oh that's good thinking. I guess you're right, also seeing the S models have had bigger longevity in general. I am only asking, because I was thinking of getting an iPhone 7 but I was thinking of waiting for the 7S and the 8.", '>>{AreWeNotDoinPhrasing} : This late in the game I’d definitely wait. I got the 7 from the 6s+ about 3 months after release and even I wished I had waited lol.', ">>{itsmegeorge} : You think? This is exactly what I wanna do - I wanna get the 7 but it's already been like 6-7 months since it got out and I don't wanna regret it when the new ones come out. On the other hand I have a 5 and it's unbearably slow. :(", ">>{Fendahl_core} : It's possible, but I think they'd have to do *something* to increase performance. I could see them bumping up the clock speed or making some other modifications to the A10, similar to the way they do for the iPad models (i.e. A9 for the phone, vs. A9X for iPad). The iPad Pro revision is expected to get an A10X from what I've read (they have A9X currently). Maybe the 7S models will get that as well, or some variant of it designed to use a little less energy. The rumors of a simultaneous release of 7S and 8 models seem pretty pervasive, so I'm *inclined* to believe them. But it would be a total departure from the way Apple has always done things before. It's uncommon for Apple to make any bold changes like that, but it's definitely possible. Offering two sizes of iPhone was a big change for example. It's hard to say how they'd handle the processors since 7S & 8 release at the same time is unprecedented, but I can't imagine a 7S that doesn't have a meaningful performance boost over the 7. I'm hoping that Apple either offers OLED screens across the board or they don't price the 8 into the stratosphere. I miss having an OLED screen. If Apple delivers that OLED *and* a true dark mode in this new phones I will be very happy.", ">>{Fendahl_core} : > More power would be nice, but it's pointless unless the new chip can use less energy. I can't recall a time when Apple has ever launched a new iPhone model that didn't have a faster SoC than the one it replaced. Generally these chips get more efficient too, i.e. deliver more performance with the same energy or less. I don't see Apple breaking that trend by launching a 7S with the same A10 that's in the 7. It doesn't make sense. People expect a meaningful performance bump *and* some new features otherwise why would anyone upgrade? To get a red iPhone? Nah.", ">>{shapeshiftingrobot} : I don't disagree with you, but historically, the S line exists because people have staggered upgrade cycles. Apple certainly doesn't expect every apple user to upgrade every year, but certainly wants those upgrading on any year to be able to have something new to upgrade to. So a marginal performance bump wouldn't be out of line if the device had some other major feature, like an improved camera, wireless charging, or any of the other rumored features.", '>>{Fendahl_core} : > S models have had bigger longevity in general. This is why I always buy the S models. I also like the fact that it\'s given Apple more time to work the bugs out of the design. i.e. The 6S+ got a stronger chassis with a higher grade of aluminum to avoid bending. The S models have typically felt "just right" to me. If these rumors of a simultaneous 7S & 8 launch are true though it will give me something to think about. There are some features being teased that I have been waiting a long time for. OLED is a big one. So is a real change in the design. I liked the 5/5S design a lot. I\'m not as big a fan of the 6/6s/7 slippery bar of soap design. If the 8 is significantly different in design and it\'s a big improvement, I could see myself breaking my rule there and going for the 8.', ">>{Fendahl_core} : That makes sense. It seems like the typical performance bump is roughly 30-60% between generations. Maybe the 7S models will be on the low end of that and the 8 will be on the high end. My point was just that I don't see them releasing a 7S without a measurable bump in performance. That would be unprecedented. As good a job as Apple has done at keeping it's customers from focusing on clock speed and processor cores etc, they still want and expect an increase in overall performance with every new version, S or otherwise IMO."], ['>>{terriblejoshua} : George Takei Takes Aim At Donald Drumpf Over FBI Russia Probe', ">>{lacronicus} : Because the people that do that are dumb, and we should try to be better than that. If that's what you're going for, by all means continue, but accept the fact that you're making the world a worse place for it.", '>>{beermile} : What an unnecessary and dumb way to make an article submission invalid', ">>{terriblejoshua} : I have the addon. Didn't even notice that.", ">>{dagwood222} : There used to be a popular Christian poster listing all the names and titles Jesus had used; 'Prince of Peace,' 'The Lamb,' 'The Shepard,' 'King of Kings'... I can imagine the same thing for Donnie; 'The Cheet-O,' 'Drumpf,' 'Tiny Hands,' 'Ivanka's Pervy Dad,' 'The Thinskinned Orange Monkey'...", ">>{popname} : At least Reddit's racists are staying consistent on their racist use of a person's ancestors' name as an attack. The racist editorialization of this link's title is not OK. But, I guess if your going to link to a racist web site you might as well demonstrate your own racism.", '>>{popname} : I get how a racist like the one who posted the racist attack in the editorialized title of this link might assume the person they hate is white. But why would you make the same racist assumption? Or is the obvious answer the correct answer?', '>>{jugenbund} : George is just making me cringe at this point.', ">>{terriblejoshua} : You don't have to be white to be a white supremacist. But I can see why you might think that.", ">>{popname} : I guess you're right. Just because you're making a racist defense for a Europhobic racist doesn't preclude uou from being of European descent. Of far more interest is the fact that you call me a white supremacist for acknowledging the racist attack in this post's editorialized title. It's always a hoot to see racists defend racists by calling rational people racist.", ">>{terriblejoshua} : Dude, no one gives a shit about Trump or your argument. Trump's a traitor and should die in prison. Fuck Trump and his weird little supporters like yourself.", '>>{popname} : Wow! You\'re more sensitive than most racist snowflakes. Take a deep breath, find your safe place, and commiserate with your racist friends over coloring books and stuffed animals. And most importantly, keep chanting "This too will pass when we implement our final solution. This too will pass when we implement our final solution...." Good afternoon and good luck.'], ['>>{SaltHash} : Donnie is looking for trouble by proclaiming he can solve the problem on Twitter.', '>>{DirectTheCheckered} : I alone can fix it. Oldest scam in the book.', '>>{1461DaysInHell} : He will kill thousands, and weaken the U.S. Big daddy putin will be so proud.', ">>{TinyBaron} : He's the one looking for trouble. Both in the Middle East and in Korea. So much for America First.", ">>{TrumpImpeachedInJuly} : Healthcare and tax reform failures. They got the SC robbery they coveted. Trump's mental incapability is now threatening broad war. I think it's about time the GOP realizes they got what they could out of the useful idiot and allow impeachment proceedings to take form.", '>>{Scoutandabout} : Mr. Draft-Dodger certainly is generous with the lives of OTHER American citizens.', ">>{GeneGrantham} : Tough words for a man who dodged the draft. I guess it's okay for others to die, but not you, right DJ?", '>>{JeremyMo88} : He really is Future Biff from the Back to the Future movie.', ">>{Danny2lok} : With any other nation, this level of juvenile conduct would just be horrifically embarrassing. With NK, this level of school yard, juvenile conduct will likely end in a response that none of us would like. Taking away this man-child's twitter is now a national security issue.", ">>{eightdx} : Fuck man, don't sign that shit USA. We don't all want to start shit.", '>>{UnsubstantiatedClaim} : I read it more like he was trying to start a U.S.A chant. U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.!', ">>{Icouldbeanyone} : What is that I saw earlier. Oh yeah... IT IS AMERICA FIRST HE'S PREVENTING NORTH KOREA FROM SELLING NUKES TO ISIS AND HAVING THEM SMUGGLE THEM INTO THE UNITED STATES AND DETONATING THEM!!! That's what I've been reading today.", '>>{JacobCrim88} : [Donald loves his fake patriotism](http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/16/43/980x588/gallery-1477863987-gettyimages-539414732.jpg)', '>>{iwantttopettthekitty} : For a reason, amirite? That shit works.', '>>{geniebear} : The WH said retaliating against the chemical warfare was only greenlit to protect our national interest ELI5 how bombing some minor airfield, without targeting the chemical weapon stores or doing any real damage, does that?', '>>{nzodd} : You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect North Korea to distracting Americans from my treasonous interactions with Russia. -- Trump, 2 years from now', ">>{ScienceisMagic} : Rabid anti-trumper; I think this was the correct reaction to the use of chemical weapons here; I wish Congress backed it in 2013, but here we are. It's a message that there are consequences to the use of chemical weapons. If we let, or continue to let, the use of chemical weapons go unchecked, our share of the balance of power is diminished. Our conventional weapons systems are unmatched, if chemical and biological weapon use becomes more common place they would be able to compete with our conventional weapons systems. We also need to uphold our standing, or at least project to uphold our standing, as morally superior to these lesser states who lack our military abilities.", '>>{ScienceisMagic} : Perhaps NK will not stoop lower and thus all diplomacy with NK is elevated. Like they\'ll see the tweet and be like "Wait, is this how we come across to the rest of the world?" Or they\'re jealous of the provocative, juvenile twitter game. Give mad respect for "looking for trouble line." Sit down for diplomatic relations. Or see these sad tweets as a reflection of themselves. Realize they need to do better, no they will do better. Become open society. /s', '>>{ColePhelps-} : NO. He does NOT speak for me. Can this be grounds for impeachment?', '>>{Crazy_Mastermind} : Do not underestimate the ability of a war to bolster approval ratings. Soon it will once again be "unpatriotic" to question the president during times of war.', ">>{ItchyThunder} : Before everyone starts to worry: this message was carefully crafted by the experts in diplomacy and foreign policy that were able to wrangle the phone from Trump's hands. Trump was subdued but was not harmed. He is resting on the floor in one of the WH bathrooms.", '>>{pillbuggery} : Oh good, two fat little golden boys wagging their dicks at each other. This is fucking embarrassing.', ">>{TotesNottaBot} : Yeah sorry, none of that is currently possible with the TrumpCo/Russia love affair playing in the background. Each little episode we see every week is a thread that leads back to TrumpCo/Russia. What that strike did (just talking about my, a tax paying voter, perception of the events as they've unfolded) was prove that Trump would order a military strike if he thought it would give him political cover.", ">>{onehandsomegamer} : I mean yeah, if you're ok with the US acting impulsively in a unilateral manner to start a war that will cause innocent casualties in collateral, then yeah we should all support it. Quit acting like we have any authority or moral high ground to start a damn war.", '>>{ScienceisMagic} : >start a war that will cause innocent casualties in collateral Could argue that lack of action in [2013](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2017/04/11/daily-202-reflexive-partisanship-drives-polling-lurch-on-syria-strikes/58ec27d4e9b69b3a72331e6e/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_diplo-9a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&tid=a_inl&utm_term=.1c8806c0b538) caused 500K Syrian deaths so far.', '>>{llllIlllIllIlI} : It\'s official. America can no longer look at tin-pot dictators and banana republics and all sorts of strongmen throughout history and laugh and say "never us." Or get confused about "good Germans." (No, I\'m not saying he\'s even close to Adolf. Just comparing mass movements that we have historically sneered at.)']]

classify and reply

['>>{MerrickGreen} : 6/6s and 6/6s Plus owners, what is your biggest regret with choosing the size you did?', '>>{seanosul} : Tale of Two Campaigns: Kaine to Headline HRC Event While Trump and Pence Court Hate Group', ">>{ReliableSource} : I went from a 5s to a 6s Plus and I don't regret it at all. Love the battery life, love the size, and I can still use the phone one-handed (although I use Reachability a lot). I thought I was going to be giving up a lot of one-handed use when getting the Plus, but it turned out not to be the case for me.", ">>{Telynor} : I've had my 6+ for almost two years, and have loved it the whole time. However, its size is finally starting to cause problems. I hold it with my pinky on the bottom side of the phone (by the lightning port) with my pinky supporting some of the weight of the phone. Doing this for such a long time has started to cause pain in my hand even when I'm not holding the phone.", ">>{MerrickGreen} : I do that a lot with my current phone, especially when using the selfie cam. It can make the phone a bit difficult to control, and it's hard to get a clear shot without motion blur.", '>>{x9a} : I have a 6plus and I don\'t regret it at all. When I bought it a week after release everybody said "so big, so dumb". But now most of them say "I wish I had a bigger screen for ___". The size bothers me in my pocket when I go to the gym, or sitting down in the car because it slides out of my pocket. But those are the only downsides for me.', ">>{cajunrajing} : Well if that doesn't sum it up right there. Trump and Pence support Hate. Kaine supports equality and freedom for all. hmm", ">>{Blubbll} : That i didn't get the 1200$ back i paid for the 6S. I sold it for 550$ ._.", ">>{burlow44} : 6s here, no regrets. I occasionally wander into an Apple Store and I'll pick up a 6s+ and each time, I'm glad I have the smaller size", ">>{hearthneewb} : And this is why I'm fine voting for Hillary-Kaine even if it turns out Hillary murdered Elmo. Kaine is a cool dude who is better than Trump and leave Pence in the pile of shit his life began in.", '>>{WaltBush} : Are there any conservative groups that are not "hate groups?" What a meaningless, bullshit label.', ">>{MerrickGreen} : Basically, if Apple had made the 6s as thick as the camera bump and used that space to give it a decent battery, I'd jump on it.", ">>{hearthneewb} : I mean the NRA isn't realllllly a hate group... It's more of a fetish group.", '>>{FatLadySingin} : Let me guess.... Trump and Pence at a Klan meeting? Looking..... nope, [American Family Association](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/american-family-association). Close though!', '>>{cyclopsrex} : Why do the Republicans keep pushing the anti-gay stuff. They lost and it is done.', '>>{ukraine_not_weak} : She probably thinks HRC stands for Hillary (is) Right Campaign! /s', ">>{mmaireenehc} : I went from the 6 to the 6S Plus and now I'm testing out the SE. The Plus was way too big. My hands actually got tired from holding it. Spec-wise, the Plus doesn't measure out to be a lot bigger than the 6, but when you pair the size and weight with how I hold my phone (from the bottom, with pinkies supporting the base), it was unyielding. I kept almost dropping it (and it was also impossible to take selfies with one hand). The Plus was just bad ergonomics for me. My 6 has commendable battery for me because I am a light mobile medial consumer. It makes it through the day with light usage. I usually charge at night or the next morning. It was a good phone (I still have it but I'm testing out the SE).", ">>{shillmaster_9000} : It's a hate group. It trys to combat the 'homosexual agenda'", '>>{FatLadySingin} : > Are there any conservative groups that are not "hate groups?" **That** is a good question. Thinking...... [American Freedom Party](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/american-freedom-party), nope.... uh....[Center for Security Policy](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/center-security-policy), nope....uh... [Council of Conservative Citizens](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/council-conservative-citizens), nope.... uh..... [Family Research Council](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/family-research-council) nope....', ">>{vkoser} : Same here on the pinky pain. I just got a loopy case last week and it's been great in that respect.", ">>{cajunrajing} : Not so much. She was at the event when the HRC endorsed HRC and they made a big deal about. Cute little signs and all. Also, unlike Trump, she's invested in America and takes the time to understand issues facing America, like the ongoing fight for LGBT equal rights.", '>>{Blubbll} : 128 with AppleCare+ and Apple 6s Leather case & CellularLine glass protector', '>>{defjamblaster} : i only wish it was smaller sometimes when putting it in my pocket. mine is in a lifeproof fre case. battery life is great though.', '>>{seanosul} : > Are there any conservative groups that are not "hate groups?" Maybe, some time in the past, Cato could have been a non hate group. I can\'t think of any current ones either.', '>>{ukraine_not_weak} : I had the "/s" there and everything, dude.', '>>{seanosul} : Hate is just as good as Ikea. Makes a nice closet you can knock up quickly.', ">>{cajunrajing} : I know. I was actually more just responding as it was one of the first times I'd been active with the HRC at all, so was rather cool to be part of them actively working for the bettering of human lives. Was more of a fanboy type moment, I suppose. Also, Mike Pence scares me, so I am genuinely worried about the even slight possibility of him being president.", ">>{Old_Army90} : CATO isn't really hardline conservative though. They're more libertarian.", ">>{mspaintshoops} : So are you asserting that they *aren't* a hate group? Or... [AFA says God is going to use ISIS to punish America for being tolerant of LGBTQ people. ](http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/fischer-god-will-use-isis-punish-america-gay-rights)", ">>{Ryr45} : I originally chose the 6s, but traded somebody for the 6s plus and I couldn't be happier. The bigger size and weight haven't caused me any problems yet.", '>>{FatLadySingin} : Yeah, I think I was pointing them out to be on the same footing as the Klan... :) (Link supporting)', ">>{seanosul} : That's why I said perhaps not them but they have chased social Conservatives money, so they are not fully exempt.", ">>{dread_beard} : This is just their pathetic, last-ditch effort. The death rattle of this wide-spread bigotry. Now, don't get that twisted. The bigotry will always exist and there will always be some attempts from social conservatives to undermine LGBTQ rights and such, but this is truly the end of it being a mainstream thing. After the next five or so years, I don't think we'll hear much from the right on this issue in the main stream.", '>>{Mattyx6427} : > if it turns out Hillary murdered Elmo Having spent 1 hour with a kid with a tickle me elmo. I am pro elmo murder.', ">>{mspaintshoops} : Gotcha. Sorry, vague wording. I'm an idiot. Haha", ">>{mmaireenehc} : I had a 6 prior. It's fantastic, actually. It's noticeably snappier than the 6. The battery is amazing. The small size threw me off initially but after a while, it's kinda like being reunited with an old friend. Also swipe typing with Gboard using one hand is really ace.", '>>{Jamesxxxiii} : I have a 6s and currently thinking about selling it and getting the 6s plus.', '>>{FatLadySingin} : Nah. I do the same thing in this toxic environment. :)', '>>{byerss} : Pinkie injury is one of the major factors for me going from the 6 (non-plus) down to an SE. Other reason not being able to reach all the screen one-handed without having to shuffle the phone up/down in my hand.', '>>{byerss} : I went from the 5 to the 6 and then back to the SE. 6 had a nice screen, and the size was appreciated for its roominess, but was unappreciated because it was too big to use one-handed. Having to hit a UI element on the top of the screen, and then subsequently on the bottom resulted in the on handed "phone shuffle". I couldn\'t stand it anymore so I went down to an SE. SE is definitely preferred for its compact size, but I do sometimes miss the bigger screen... until I have to actually handle a large phone again.', '>>{snailshoe} : 6s+ owner. I regret not having a longer thumb.', ">>{WaltBush} : It must be difficult to be the principals of the SPLC. To feel hated merely by someone disapproving of your behavior - even though it's someone you clearly hold very little respect for - sounds very stressful.", ">>{Chancely_S} : I'll second that. Picked up a popsocket, same idea just different device, and have been very happy.", '>>{TheKingInTheNorth98} : Just curious but how is the performance on it with ios 9?', ">>{x9a} : I'd give it a 8.5/10. A few stutters here and there, but overall smooth and runs fine.", '>>{kickstand} : I find the 6 (non-plus) size to be optimal.', '>>{FatLadySingin} : > To feel hated merely by someone disapproving of your behavior You could pick your nose in front of me and I\'ll disapprove. The moment I move into the hate arena is when I make up stats and push an agenda that suppresses and discriminates against you because of your chosen nose picking or beliefs of nose picking... >"One of the primary goals of the nose pickers is to abolish all age of consent laws and to eventually recognize pedophiles as the \'prophets\' of a new sexual order." or >"Nose picking gave us Adolph Hitler, and nose pickers in the military gave us the Brown Shirts, the Nazi war machine and six million dead Jews." or >“[Nose pickers] is, in fact, a religion of war, violence, intolerance, and physical persecution of non-Nose pickers.” ....', ">>{MerrickGreen} : So rounding out the responses so far, we have 10 + owners, most of whom are happy but a few of whom have complained about the size. 4 standard size owners, one of whom would like to move to the +. 2 SE owners who were not happy with the larger phones. The results seem to suggest that, by and large, + owners find the compromises of owning such a large phone worthwhile. Overall, though, most people seem to be happy with their iPhone, whatever the size. Personally, I'm leaning towards the Plus and just hoping that I can bear to keep using my phone until the 7 is available. Thanks, everyone, and feel free to keep posting your experience. I'll edit this comment as needed to keep it up to date.", ">>{ayrwalker} : ... I'm amazed that I'm not the only one who is thinking this same thing. I FOUND MY PEOPLE. we all have bad pinkies.", ">>{seanosul} : > It trys to combat the 'homosexual agenda' What agenda is this? Where do I find it?", ">>{seanosul} : I'd love for you to take time off your busy agenda and let me in to something only social conservatives know. How is a cake gay or straight? Do straight cakes reproduce? Can you leave two straight cakes together and get a third baby cake? How do you know if one cake is male or female?", '>>{Im_in_timeout} : All the GOP has to offer is bigotry and conspiracy theories.', ">>{WaltBush} : Clearly there's some way to tell. Otherwise you'd never be able to punish anyone for their bigotry.", '>>{WaltBush} : And your answer is evidence that the label is overbroad. It appears to be intended for use as a political tool, rather than an accurate description of whether these groups actually preach hate.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{seanosul} : Tale of Two Campaigns: Kaine to Headline HRC Event While Trump and Pence Court Hate Group', ">>{cajunrajing} : Well if that doesn't sum it up right there. Trump and Pence support Hate. Kaine supports equality and freedom for all. hmm", ">>{hearthneewb} : And this is why I'm fine voting for Hillary-Kaine even if it turns out Hillary murdered Elmo. Kaine is a cool dude who is better than Trump and leave Pence in the pile of shit his life began in.", '>>{WaltBush} : Are there any conservative groups that are not "hate groups?" What a meaningless, bullshit label.', ">>{hearthneewb} : I mean the NRA isn't realllllly a hate group... It's more of a fetish group.", '>>{FatLadySingin} : Let me guess.... Trump and Pence at a Klan meeting? Looking..... nope, [American Family Association](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/american-family-association). Close though!', '>>{cyclopsrex} : Why do the Republicans keep pushing the anti-gay stuff. They lost and it is done.', '>>{ukraine_not_weak} : She probably thinks HRC stands for Hillary (is) Right Campaign! /s', ">>{shillmaster_9000} : It's a hate group. It trys to combat the 'homosexual agenda'", '>>{FatLadySingin} : > Are there any conservative groups that are not "hate groups?" **That** is a good question. Thinking...... [American Freedom Party](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/american-freedom-party), nope.... uh....[Center for Security Policy](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/center-security-policy), nope....uh... [Council of Conservative Citizens](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/council-conservative-citizens), nope.... uh..... [Family Research Council](https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/family-research-council) nope....', ">>{cajunrajing} : Not so much. She was at the event when the HRC endorsed HRC and they made a big deal about. Cute little signs and all. Also, unlike Trump, she's invested in America and takes the time to understand issues facing America, like the ongoing fight for LGBT equal rights.", '>>{seanosul} : > Are there any conservative groups that are not "hate groups?" Maybe, some time in the past, Cato could have been a non hate group. I can\'t think of any current ones either.', '>>{ukraine_not_weak} : I had the "/s" there and everything, dude.', '>>{seanosul} : Hate is just as good as Ikea. Makes a nice closet you can knock up quickly.', ">>{cajunrajing} : I know. I was actually more just responding as it was one of the first times I'd been active with the HRC at all, so was rather cool to be part of them actively working for the bettering of human lives. Was more of a fanboy type moment, I suppose. Also, Mike Pence scares me, so I am genuinely worried about the even slight possibility of him being president.", ">>{Old_Army90} : CATO isn't really hardline conservative though. They're more libertarian.", ">>{mspaintshoops} : So are you asserting that they *aren't* a hate group? Or... [AFA says God is going to use ISIS to punish America for being tolerant of LGBTQ people. ](http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/fischer-god-will-use-isis-punish-america-gay-rights)", '>>{FatLadySingin} : Yeah, I think I was pointing them out to be on the same footing as the Klan... :) (Link supporting)', ">>{seanosul} : That's why I said perhaps not them but they have chased social Conservatives money, so they are not fully exempt.", ">>{dread_beard} : This is just their pathetic, last-ditch effort. The death rattle of this wide-spread bigotry. Now, don't get that twisted. The bigotry will always exist and there will always be some attempts from social conservatives to undermine LGBTQ rights and such, but this is truly the end of it being a mainstream thing. After the next five or so years, I don't think we'll hear much from the right on this issue in the main stream.", '>>{Mattyx6427} : > if it turns out Hillary murdered Elmo Having spent 1 hour with a kid with a tickle me elmo. I am pro elmo murder.', ">>{mspaintshoops} : Gotcha. Sorry, vague wording. I'm an idiot. Haha", '>>{FatLadySingin} : Nah. I do the same thing in this toxic environment. :)', ">>{WaltBush} : It must be difficult to be the principals of the SPLC. To feel hated merely by someone disapproving of your behavior - even though it's someone you clearly hold very little respect for - sounds very stressful.", '>>{FatLadySingin} : > To feel hated merely by someone disapproving of your behavior You could pick your nose in front of me and I\'ll disapprove. The moment I move into the hate arena is when I make up stats and push an agenda that suppresses and discriminates against you because of your chosen nose picking or beliefs of nose picking... >"One of the primary goals of the nose pickers is to abolish all age of consent laws and to eventually recognize pedophiles as the \'prophets\' of a new sexual order." or >"Nose picking gave us Adolph Hitler, and nose pickers in the military gave us the Brown Shirts, the Nazi war machine and six million dead Jews." or >“[Nose pickers] is, in fact, a religion of war, violence, intolerance, and physical persecution of non-Nose pickers.” ....', ">>{seanosul} : > It trys to combat the 'homosexual agenda' What agenda is this? Where do I find it?", ">>{seanosul} : I'd love for you to take time off your busy agenda and let me in to something only social conservatives know. How is a cake gay or straight? Do straight cakes reproduce? Can you leave two straight cakes together and get a third baby cake? How do you know if one cake is male or female?", '>>{Im_in_timeout} : All the GOP has to offer is bigotry and conspiracy theories.', ">>{WaltBush} : Clearly there's some way to tell. Otherwise you'd never be able to punish anyone for their bigotry.", '>>{WaltBush} : And your answer is evidence that the label is overbroad. It appears to be intended for use as a political tool, rather than an accurate description of whether these groups actually preach hate.'], ['>>{MerrickGreen} : 6/6s and 6/6s Plus owners, what is your biggest regret with choosing the size you did?', ">>{ReliableSource} : I went from a 5s to a 6s Plus and I don't regret it at all. Love the battery life, love the size, and I can still use the phone one-handed (although I use Reachability a lot). I thought I was going to be giving up a lot of one-handed use when getting the Plus, but it turned out not to be the case for me.", ">>{Telynor} : I've had my 6+ for almost two years, and have loved it the whole time. However, its size is finally starting to cause problems. I hold it with my pinky on the bottom side of the phone (by the lightning port) with my pinky supporting some of the weight of the phone. Doing this for such a long time has started to cause pain in my hand even when I'm not holding the phone.", ">>{MerrickGreen} : I do that a lot with my current phone, especially when using the selfie cam. It can make the phone a bit difficult to control, and it's hard to get a clear shot without motion blur.", '>>{x9a} : I have a 6plus and I don\'t regret it at all. When I bought it a week after release everybody said "so big, so dumb". But now most of them say "I wish I had a bigger screen for ___". The size bothers me in my pocket when I go to the gym, or sitting down in the car because it slides out of my pocket. But those are the only downsides for me.', ">>{Blubbll} : That i didn't get the 1200$ back i paid for the 6S. I sold it for 550$ ._.", ">>{burlow44} : 6s here, no regrets. I occasionally wander into an Apple Store and I'll pick up a 6s+ and each time, I'm glad I have the smaller size", ">>{MerrickGreen} : Basically, if Apple had made the 6s as thick as the camera bump and used that space to give it a decent battery, I'd jump on it.", ">>{mmaireenehc} : I went from the 6 to the 6S Plus and now I'm testing out the SE. The Plus was way too big. My hands actually got tired from holding it. Spec-wise, the Plus doesn't measure out to be a lot bigger than the 6, but when you pair the size and weight with how I hold my phone (from the bottom, with pinkies supporting the base), it was unyielding. I kept almost dropping it (and it was also impossible to take selfies with one hand). The Plus was just bad ergonomics for me. My 6 has commendable battery for me because I am a light mobile medial consumer. It makes it through the day with light usage. I usually charge at night or the next morning. It was a good phone (I still have it but I'm testing out the SE).", ">>{vkoser} : Same here on the pinky pain. I just got a loopy case last week and it's been great in that respect.", '>>{Blubbll} : 128 with AppleCare+ and Apple 6s Leather case & CellularLine glass protector', '>>{defjamblaster} : i only wish it was smaller sometimes when putting it in my pocket. mine is in a lifeproof fre case. battery life is great though.', ">>{Ryr45} : I originally chose the 6s, but traded somebody for the 6s plus and I couldn't be happier. The bigger size and weight haven't caused me any problems yet.", ">>{mmaireenehc} : I had a 6 prior. It's fantastic, actually. It's noticeably snappier than the 6. The battery is amazing. The small size threw me off initially but after a while, it's kinda like being reunited with an old friend. Also swipe typing with Gboard using one hand is really ace.", '>>{Jamesxxxiii} : I have a 6s and currently thinking about selling it and getting the 6s plus.', '>>{byerss} : Pinkie injury is one of the major factors for me going from the 6 (non-plus) down to an SE. Other reason not being able to reach all the screen one-handed without having to shuffle the phone up/down in my hand.', '>>{byerss} : I went from the 5 to the 6 and then back to the SE. 6 had a nice screen, and the size was appreciated for its roominess, but was unappreciated because it was too big to use one-handed. Having to hit a UI element on the top of the screen, and then subsequently on the bottom resulted in the on handed "phone shuffle". I couldn\'t stand it anymore so I went down to an SE. SE is definitely preferred for its compact size, but I do sometimes miss the bigger screen... until I have to actually handle a large phone again.', '>>{snailshoe} : 6s+ owner. I regret not having a longer thumb.', ">>{Chancely_S} : I'll second that. Picked up a popsocket, same idea just different device, and have been very happy.", '>>{TheKingInTheNorth98} : Just curious but how is the performance on it with ios 9?', ">>{x9a} : I'd give it a 8.5/10. A few stutters here and there, but overall smooth and runs fine.", '>>{kickstand} : I find the 6 (non-plus) size to be optimal.', ">>{MerrickGreen} : So rounding out the responses so far, we have 10 + owners, most of whom are happy but a few of whom have complained about the size. 4 standard size owners, one of whom would like to move to the +. 2 SE owners who were not happy with the larger phones. The results seem to suggest that, by and large, + owners find the compromises of owning such a large phone worthwhile. Overall, though, most people seem to be happy with their iPhone, whatever the size. Personally, I'm leaning towards the Plus and just hoping that I can bear to keep using my phone until the 7 is available. Thanks, everyone, and feel free to keep posting your experience. I'll edit this comment as needed to keep it up to date.", ">>{ayrwalker} : ... I'm amazed that I'm not the only one who is thinking this same thing. I FOUND MY PEOPLE. we all have bad pinkies."]]

classify and reply

['>>{wytxcook} : Bernie Sanders Is Being a Good Democrat (For Now)', ">>{ME24601} : >Will that last if she wins the White House? The question shouldn't be if Bernie Sanders will stay loyal to Clinton, it should be if Clinton will stand by the platform they created. He doesn't owe her anything, and has no reason to stay loyal to her if she refuses to be a progressive.", ">>{SJHalflingRanger} : Title seems overly ominous. Bernie and other progressives should be loudly and publicly putting pressure on the president, which will make it seem like she's compromising when she enacts a more muted but progressive agenda. GOP has been using that trick for decades.", ">>{Hobo_Taco} : > The question shouldn't be if Bernie Sanders will stay loyal to Clinton, it should be if Clinton will stand by the platform they created. Calling it now. Only after being pressed to do so, much like with her tepid response to the Dakota pipeline crisis, HRC will give progressives a bunch of empty rhetoric about how she tried to stand by the platform, but those darn Republicans in Congress obstructed her. Will she proactively use her political capital to make a strong case to the American people about the need for real reforms? Nope. I'd love to be wrong, but I don't think I am.", ">>{Hobo_Taco} : Since there are only two major parties in Congress, and Democrats lean to the left of the Republicans, that's not exactly surprising.", '>>{ozabelle} : bernie has long been one of the best friends the democrats ever had.', ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : > The question shouldn't be if Bernie Sanders will stay loyal to Clinton, it should be if Clinton will stand by the platform they created. > Calling it now. Only after being pressed to do so, much like with her tepid response to the Dakota pipeline crisis, HRC will give progressives a bunch of empty rhetoric about how she tried to stand by the platform, but those darn Republicans in Congress obstructed her. You are obviously not old enough to remember how progressive she was when Bill was president and how she worked with Bernie on many issues. Your hyperbole of how she is just faking being progressive is full of shit.", '>>{Hobo_Taco} : I\'ve done plenty of research on the 1990\'s even though I was too young to feel motivated to follow politics at the time. Hillary has never shown any signs of being progressive. Neither has Bill. They\'re "Third Way" Democrats who pander to progressives and serve their wealthy buddies when they\'re in office.', '>>{FightTheClintocracy} : Bill and Hillary\'s support for NAFTA, DOMA, the welfare reform bill, the crime bill, the bankruptcy reform bill, and the repeal of Glass Steagall, all of which Bernie opposed, begs to disagree with you. I\'m going to cut you off before you inevitably say "Bernie voted for the crime bill": he opposed it throughout its conception and only voted for it once it contained the Violence Against Women Act and an assault weapons restriction, and *still* condemned it when voting for it by saying that crime could only be prevented with jobs and education, not incarceration.', ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : FACT: NAFTA created more jobs than it destroyed FACT: DOMA protected LGBT rights in the workplace and allowed states the right to expand that into same sex marriage. The fact you think this is a negative shows your regressive view of history. You have absolutely no idea how persecuted gays were in the 90's and how the Clinton's helped the community gain civil rights.", ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : > I've done plenty of research on the 1990's lol, child you have no idea, there is a reason the Clinton's are revered by the LBGT community. You can look at revisionist history all you want but the fact is until the Clinton's came along the LBGT community didn't have any friends in DC. There is a reason they are choosing Clinton over Bernie and defiantly over Donnie.", '>>{FightTheClintocracy} : > FACT: NAFTA created more jobs than it destroyed In Mexico, for pennies an hour to exploited workers > FACT: DOMA protected LBGT rights in the workplace and allowed states the right to expand that into same sex marriage. It allowed states to deny marriage benefits to same-sex couples married outside the state. These are not things to be proud of. Only Bernie gets to be proud for standing against them when it actually mattered.', ">>{Hobo_Taco} : Oh, it looks like you misunderstood me. I'm talking about meaningful progressive reform that addresses the serious imbalance in in the distribution of resources that exists in America. I'm not referring to the constant empty rhetoric directed at historically marginalized groups that helps the Clintons to win support from progressives without them actually needing to do much of anything that makes a difference.", '>>{NonHomogenized} : > FACT: DOMA protected LGBT rights in the workplace In what possible sense did DOMA protect LGBT rights? I couldn\'t think of any, so I [checked the text of the Act](https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ199/html/PLAW-104publ199.htm), and I still don\'t see anything which could be construed as protecting *any* LGBT rights. And given that the bill was written by then-anti-LGBT legislator Bob Barr, and the House Judiciary Committee (which Barr was on) said that the purpose of the bill was to "reflect and honor a collective moral judgment and to express moral disapproval of homosexuality", your assessment seems... well, unlikely. > and allowed states the right to expand that into same sex marriage No, states *already* had the right to recognize same-sex marriage. What DOMA did was *prevent* the Federal government from doing so (including offering marriage benefits to same-sex partners in any states that *did* choose to recognize same-sex marriage), and ensure that *other* states wouldn\'t have to follow their obligations under the "full faith and credit" clause by recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states. If DOMA was so good for the LGBT community, why was it opposed by Barney Frank, Steve Gunderson, and Gerry Studds - all three openly LGBT members of Congress at the time?', ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : Look you can jump through hoops all day but the facts remain the LGBT community respects the Clinton's because they did more to advance their cause than any other administration. Bernie didn't do jack shit, Obama was late to the party, anyone around in the '90's remembers what the Clinton's did and they will continue to support them.", '>>{NonHomogenized} : All of that - accurate or not - is irrelevant here: you made an assertion about what DOMA did, and that assertion is laughably untrue. Indeed, no one who was around in the 90s was under the impression that DOMA was anything but an anti-LGBT measure, and I object to you trying to rewrite history to make DOMA into the *exact opposite* of what it actually was.', ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : Your vague answer only tells us you were not around in the 90's. The year it was signed was an election year and DOMA was a comprise between the then republican controlled congress and Clinton fighting for reelection in '96. The law allowed states to recognize same sex marriages while limiting federal laws from overruling those state laws. You can beat your head against this issue all you want but the fact remains for those of us around at the time DOMA, as well as Don't Ask, Don't Tell were steeping stones to the equality laws we have now.", ">>{NonHomogenized} : > Your vague answer only tells us you were not around in the 90's. Actually, I was, and I *already* addressed [exactly how DOMA was very much *not* what you claimed, in my previous post](http://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5asgqt/bernie_sanders_is_being_a_good_democrat_for_now/d9j5fqm/). I know why Bill Clinton supported DOMA at the time, and it had nothing to do with helping LGBT people."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{wytxcook} : Bernie Sanders Is Being a Good Democrat (For Now)', ">>{ME24601} : >Will that last if she wins the White House? The question shouldn't be if Bernie Sanders will stay loyal to Clinton, it should be if Clinton will stand by the platform they created. He doesn't owe her anything, and has no reason to stay loyal to her if she refuses to be a progressive.", ">>{SJHalflingRanger} : Title seems overly ominous. Bernie and other progressives should be loudly and publicly putting pressure on the president, which will make it seem like she's compromising when she enacts a more muted but progressive agenda. GOP has been using that trick for decades.", ">>{Hobo_Taco} : > The question shouldn't be if Bernie Sanders will stay loyal to Clinton, it should be if Clinton will stand by the platform they created. Calling it now. Only after being pressed to do so, much like with her tepid response to the Dakota pipeline crisis, HRC will give progressives a bunch of empty rhetoric about how she tried to stand by the platform, but those darn Republicans in Congress obstructed her. Will she proactively use her political capital to make a strong case to the American people about the need for real reforms? Nope. I'd love to be wrong, but I don't think I am.", ">>{Hobo_Taco} : Since there are only two major parties in Congress, and Democrats lean to the left of the Republicans, that's not exactly surprising.", '>>{ozabelle} : bernie has long been one of the best friends the democrats ever had.', ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : > The question shouldn't be if Bernie Sanders will stay loyal to Clinton, it should be if Clinton will stand by the platform they created. > Calling it now. Only after being pressed to do so, much like with her tepid response to the Dakota pipeline crisis, HRC will give progressives a bunch of empty rhetoric about how she tried to stand by the platform, but those darn Republicans in Congress obstructed her. You are obviously not old enough to remember how progressive she was when Bill was president and how she worked with Bernie on many issues. Your hyperbole of how she is just faking being progressive is full of shit.", '>>{Hobo_Taco} : I\'ve done plenty of research on the 1990\'s even though I was too young to feel motivated to follow politics at the time. Hillary has never shown any signs of being progressive. Neither has Bill. They\'re "Third Way" Democrats who pander to progressives and serve their wealthy buddies when they\'re in office.', '>>{FightTheClintocracy} : Bill and Hillary\'s support for NAFTA, DOMA, the welfare reform bill, the crime bill, the bankruptcy reform bill, and the repeal of Glass Steagall, all of which Bernie opposed, begs to disagree with you. I\'m going to cut you off before you inevitably say "Bernie voted for the crime bill": he opposed it throughout its conception and only voted for it once it contained the Violence Against Women Act and an assault weapons restriction, and *still* condemned it when voting for it by saying that crime could only be prevented with jobs and education, not incarceration.', ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : FACT: NAFTA created more jobs than it destroyed FACT: DOMA protected LGBT rights in the workplace and allowed states the right to expand that into same sex marriage. The fact you think this is a negative shows your regressive view of history. You have absolutely no idea how persecuted gays were in the 90's and how the Clinton's helped the community gain civil rights.", ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : > I've done plenty of research on the 1990's lol, child you have no idea, there is a reason the Clinton's are revered by the LBGT community. You can look at revisionist history all you want but the fact is until the Clinton's came along the LBGT community didn't have any friends in DC. There is a reason they are choosing Clinton over Bernie and defiantly over Donnie.", '>>{FightTheClintocracy} : > FACT: NAFTA created more jobs than it destroyed In Mexico, for pennies an hour to exploited workers > FACT: DOMA protected LBGT rights in the workplace and allowed states the right to expand that into same sex marriage. It allowed states to deny marriage benefits to same-sex couples married outside the state. These are not things to be proud of. Only Bernie gets to be proud for standing against them when it actually mattered.', ">>{Hobo_Taco} : Oh, it looks like you misunderstood me. I'm talking about meaningful progressive reform that addresses the serious imbalance in in the distribution of resources that exists in America. I'm not referring to the constant empty rhetoric directed at historically marginalized groups that helps the Clintons to win support from progressives without them actually needing to do much of anything that makes a difference.", '>>{NonHomogenized} : > FACT: DOMA protected LGBT rights in the workplace In what possible sense did DOMA protect LGBT rights? I couldn\'t think of any, so I [checked the text of the Act](https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ199/html/PLAW-104publ199.htm), and I still don\'t see anything which could be construed as protecting *any* LGBT rights. And given that the bill was written by then-anti-LGBT legislator Bob Barr, and the House Judiciary Committee (which Barr was on) said that the purpose of the bill was to "reflect and honor a collective moral judgment and to express moral disapproval of homosexuality", your assessment seems... well, unlikely. > and allowed states the right to expand that into same sex marriage No, states *already* had the right to recognize same-sex marriage. What DOMA did was *prevent* the Federal government from doing so (including offering marriage benefits to same-sex partners in any states that *did* choose to recognize same-sex marriage), and ensure that *other* states wouldn\'t have to follow their obligations under the "full faith and credit" clause by recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states. If DOMA was so good for the LGBT community, why was it opposed by Barney Frank, Steve Gunderson, and Gerry Studds - all three openly LGBT members of Congress at the time?', ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : Look you can jump through hoops all day but the facts remain the LGBT community respects the Clinton's because they did more to advance their cause than any other administration. Bernie didn't do jack shit, Obama was late to the party, anyone around in the '90's remembers what the Clinton's did and they will continue to support them.", '>>{NonHomogenized} : All of that - accurate or not - is irrelevant here: you made an assertion about what DOMA did, and that assertion is laughably untrue. Indeed, no one who was around in the 90s was under the impression that DOMA was anything but an anti-LGBT measure, and I object to you trying to rewrite history to make DOMA into the *exact opposite* of what it actually was.', ">>{IAMTHEWALLS} : Your vague answer only tells us you were not around in the 90's. The year it was signed was an election year and DOMA was a comprise between the then republican controlled congress and Clinton fighting for reelection in '96. The law allowed states to recognize same sex marriages while limiting federal laws from overruling those state laws. You can beat your head against this issue all you want but the fact remains for those of us around at the time DOMA, as well as Don't Ask, Don't Tell were steeping stones to the equality laws we have now.", ">>{NonHomogenized} : > Your vague answer only tells us you were not around in the 90's. Actually, I was, and I *already* addressed [exactly how DOMA was very much *not* what you claimed, in my previous post](http://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5asgqt/bernie_sanders_is_being_a_good_democrat_for_now/d9j5fqm/). I know why Bill Clinton supported DOMA at the time, and it had nothing to do with helping LGBT people."]]

classify and reply

[">>{scsuhockey} : Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell: 'The Russians are not our friends.'", '>>{letdogsvote} : About fucking time McConnell stepped up and did something right.', '>>{The_cuckmaker} : Then why the fuck did he threaten to take their exposure as a partisan attack?!', '>>{Morchaint} : ...now that the election is over, we maintained our majorities, and my wife has been nominated to be Secretary of Transporation.', ">>{fatherhamlet44} : Americans need to stop pretending that Russia is the creeping, ominous, anti-American empire. They're actually just the fucking mob", '>>{MortimerAdler} : He also just rejected a special committee to investigate. He just said this to try and spin it', ">>{espo619} : McConnell's wife will be in Trump's cabinet. He could be the biggest impediment towards any investigation.", '>>{AbandonEarth4Peace} : Thank you fucking McCain and McConnell. I still dont like you but thank you. lol. McConnell and GOP are still polar opposite to me from principles perspective but holy shit, Seriously, this shit is ridiculous. If Trump does not get in line with GOP, he is not coming out of this. Which fucking leaves us with the crazy GOP 4 years, but I am way OK with No EPA, Fuck Climate change, No Financial Regulations etc etc, people fucking voted for it..fine, considering the other fucking option which is Putin-Trump love drama reality show for next 4 years destroying the world.', ">>{nlyles1} : They still wanted to win. They thought they could keep it quiet, and control trump. But a month in, they've realized they can't control him and no one can talk him down. He won't listen to anyone, even our intelligence agencies. At this point him becoming the president is no longer about getting what they want. It's about him being a real potential threat to national security. If they don't get him out of power, we're fucked.", '>>{bunchacruncha16} : every now and then a turtle pokes his head out.', ">>{onetoughmotherfucker} : He waited until after his wife got a job in Trump's admin to say anything. He's more weasel than turtle.", '>>{Roach35} : Rejected "special" committee to get a "congressional committee" instead. They committed themselves, now lets see if they do their job before the electoral college votes.', '>>{RigidChop} : Some of these old dudes are hell-bent on starting World War III, it seems...', ">>{FitPCOS} : Don't thank McConnell. He is not to be trusted, ever. He used the information the CIA gave him to his own gain: He used it for partisan politics and to gain his wife a seat in the Cabinet. I wouldn't be surprised if he tipped the Trump team off about what was happening, too.", '>>{AnonxnonA} : Welcome to what will one day be known as "the lead up to World War III" folks. We\'ve been headed to war with Russia for a long time. If we\'re lucky, it will be cold war and proxy wars - which is still horrific. If we\'re not lucky, and 2016 has shown this to be very possible, we\'re headed for *real* war. And it\'s not going to be pretty. Ukraine, Syria, far-right wing movements gaining steam in Europe and Asia. Skyrocketing income inequality in the United States. Russian interference in our election. A madman headed to the White House. China posturing and directly challenging the incoming president. What could go wrong? We\'re at a tipping point, all it will take is one big event to send everything into motion.', '>>{AnonxnonA} : No, they are a creeping, ominous, anti-American empire. With nuclear weapons and a very impressive intelligence network. And no rules.', '>>{AnonxnonA} : It\'s going to happen. And it\'s not just "old dudes" making it happen. War with Russia is basically inevitable - there are too many historical reasons why for me to even go into.', '>>{geekwonk} : Yes precisely. Congressional Republicans proved under Bush how deeply eager they are to keep their own side accountable, so I expect we should get a redacted executive summary back from this closed door Republican-run committee some time in the next three years, max four.', '>>{trying-to-be-civil} : I just enjoy the way it feels when they bend my country over and give me a reach-around.', ">>{cd411} : It was McConnell who fought to keep the facts quiet about Russia hacking *before* the election. [How Mitch McConnell Prevented Stronger Action Against Russian Election Meddling](http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/12/10/mitch_mcconnell_prevented_stronger_action_against_russian_election_meddling.html) He's complicit in the hack *and* the coverup! Now Democrats and many Republicans are speaking out against it and McConnell is running for cover. Another Republican hypocrite .", ">>{Tidusx145} : I know we'd probably win that war. But at what cost? Two nuclear powered countries duking it out means total destruction in my eyes.", '>>{sugarfreeeyecandy} : > and my wife has been nominated to be Secretary of Transporation. Surprise, Mitch, but you are not our friend either. Nor is your father in law whose ship was caught running drugs.', ">>{sugarfreeeyecandy} : > If they don't get him out of power, we're fucked. It comes to this.", '>>{MortimerAdler} : Rejecting a special committee is a statement, special committees are designed for investigation and cut across jurisdictions to get work done on a specific issue more effectively, a standing committee means the Republicans are keeping their thumbs on it, using a committee without special investigative powers.', '>>{TheCoronersGambit} : Fuck Mitch McConnell. He was briefed before the election and promised to make this a political weapon if the issue was raised.', ">>{XG32} : Let's just say the GOP has to decide on a replacement: McCain (he's 80), Romney, Jeb, Take your pick. Trump should not be a partisan issue if it's found that the Russians tempered with the election.", '>>{Folsomdsf} : Of course not, they are YOUR friend McConnell.', '>>{egs1928} : >The Russians are not our friends. Then why are you handing the country over to them?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{scsuhockey} : Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell: 'The Russians are not our friends.'", '>>{letdogsvote} : About fucking time McConnell stepped up and did something right.', '>>{The_cuckmaker} : Then why the fuck did he threaten to take their exposure as a partisan attack?!', '>>{Morchaint} : ...now that the election is over, we maintained our majorities, and my wife has been nominated to be Secretary of Transporation.', ">>{fatherhamlet44} : Americans need to stop pretending that Russia is the creeping, ominous, anti-American empire. They're actually just the fucking mob", '>>{MortimerAdler} : He also just rejected a special committee to investigate. He just said this to try and spin it', ">>{espo619} : McConnell's wife will be in Trump's cabinet. He could be the biggest impediment towards any investigation.", '>>{AbandonEarth4Peace} : Thank you fucking McCain and McConnell. I still dont like you but thank you. lol. McConnell and GOP are still polar opposite to me from principles perspective but holy shit, Seriously, this shit is ridiculous. If Trump does not get in line with GOP, he is not coming out of this. Which fucking leaves us with the crazy GOP 4 years, but I am way OK with No EPA, Fuck Climate change, No Financial Regulations etc etc, people fucking voted for it..fine, considering the other fucking option which is Putin-Trump love drama reality show for next 4 years destroying the world.', ">>{nlyles1} : They still wanted to win. They thought they could keep it quiet, and control trump. But a month in, they've realized they can't control him and no one can talk him down. He won't listen to anyone, even our intelligence agencies. At this point him becoming the president is no longer about getting what they want. It's about him being a real potential threat to national security. If they don't get him out of power, we're fucked.", '>>{bunchacruncha16} : every now and then a turtle pokes his head out.', ">>{onetoughmotherfucker} : He waited until after his wife got a job in Trump's admin to say anything. He's more weasel than turtle.", '>>{Roach35} : Rejected "special" committee to get a "congressional committee" instead. They committed themselves, now lets see if they do their job before the electoral college votes.', '>>{RigidChop} : Some of these old dudes are hell-bent on starting World War III, it seems...', ">>{FitPCOS} : Don't thank McConnell. He is not to be trusted, ever. He used the information the CIA gave him to his own gain: He used it for partisan politics and to gain his wife a seat in the Cabinet. I wouldn't be surprised if he tipped the Trump team off about what was happening, too.", '>>{AnonxnonA} : Welcome to what will one day be known as "the lead up to World War III" folks. We\'ve been headed to war with Russia for a long time. If we\'re lucky, it will be cold war and proxy wars - which is still horrific. If we\'re not lucky, and 2016 has shown this to be very possible, we\'re headed for *real* war. And it\'s not going to be pretty. Ukraine, Syria, far-right wing movements gaining steam in Europe and Asia. Skyrocketing income inequality in the United States. Russian interference in our election. A madman headed to the White House. China posturing and directly challenging the incoming president. What could go wrong? We\'re at a tipping point, all it will take is one big event to send everything into motion.', '>>{AnonxnonA} : No, they are a creeping, ominous, anti-American empire. With nuclear weapons and a very impressive intelligence network. And no rules.', '>>{AnonxnonA} : It\'s going to happen. And it\'s not just "old dudes" making it happen. War with Russia is basically inevitable - there are too many historical reasons why for me to even go into.', '>>{geekwonk} : Yes precisely. Congressional Republicans proved under Bush how deeply eager they are to keep their own side accountable, so I expect we should get a redacted executive summary back from this closed door Republican-run committee some time in the next three years, max four.', '>>{trying-to-be-civil} : I just enjoy the way it feels when they bend my country over and give me a reach-around.', ">>{cd411} : It was McConnell who fought to keep the facts quiet about Russia hacking *before* the election. [How Mitch McConnell Prevented Stronger Action Against Russian Election Meddling](http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/12/10/mitch_mcconnell_prevented_stronger_action_against_russian_election_meddling.html) He's complicit in the hack *and* the coverup! Now Democrats and many Republicans are speaking out against it and McConnell is running for cover. Another Republican hypocrite .", ">>{Tidusx145} : I know we'd probably win that war. But at what cost? Two nuclear powered countries duking it out means total destruction in my eyes.", '>>{sugarfreeeyecandy} : > and my wife has been nominated to be Secretary of Transporation. Surprise, Mitch, but you are not our friend either. Nor is your father in law whose ship was caught running drugs.', ">>{sugarfreeeyecandy} : > If they don't get him out of power, we're fucked. It comes to this.", '>>{MortimerAdler} : Rejecting a special committee is a statement, special committees are designed for investigation and cut across jurisdictions to get work done on a specific issue more effectively, a standing committee means the Republicans are keeping their thumbs on it, using a committee without special investigative powers.', '>>{TheCoronersGambit} : Fuck Mitch McConnell. He was briefed before the election and promised to make this a political weapon if the issue was raised.', ">>{XG32} : Let's just say the GOP has to decide on a replacement: McCain (he's 80), Romney, Jeb, Take your pick. Trump should not be a partisan issue if it's found that the Russians tempered with the election.", '>>{Folsomdsf} : Of course not, they are YOUR friend McConnell.', '>>{egs1928} : >The Russians are not our friends. Then why are you handing the country over to them?']]

classify and reply

[">>{coolcrosby} : Rudy Giuliani blames 9/11-forget gaffe on 'abbreviated' language", '>>{tonto515} : Weather Channel burns Breitbart for using its videos to deny climate change', '>>{BalaaClaava} : I have two words for those who think climate change is our number 1 priority. Climb it.', ">>{CarmineFields} : I'm 100% sure this isn't the first time Guiliani made that statement I'm going to try finding it but it'll be hard because of all the articles on what he just said. Edit: [Bingo!!!](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/jan/08/rudy-giuliani/giuliani-says-there-were-no-domestic-attacks-durin/)", '>>{IrishJoe} : So what about the other radical Islamic terrorist attacks on US soil during the Bush presidency like the LAX attack in 2002 9 months after passage of the Patriot Act??? Giuliani claimed there were no such attacks during the Bush presidency.', '>>{buckbuck2dabang} : I bet that sounded more clever in your head.', '>>{MakingAmericaGreat4U} : Having lived in southeast asia for a year, it would suck if the west gets warmer than it is now. I miss the cold temperatures from the 90s.', ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : I have two words to describe people who don't think climate change should be a top priority. Obviously, elderly. Also climb it was really bad wordplay.", ">>{throwawatc123} : Everything good that happens is thanks to Republicans. Everything bad that happens is because of Democrats. 9/11, Benghazi, Iraq, Afghanistan, the 2008 recession, the sack of Rome, and Trump's inability to score with Ivanka are all Clinton and Obama's fault. But bin Laden's death was all thanks to Special George. Ladies and gentlemen, the party of personal responsibility.", '>>{jephjo} : Obviously Barack Hussain Obama incited those to rise to power.', '>>{jephjo} : The Jon Stewart segment on the rush to claim credit for Bin Laden was great in that regard.', '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : It\'s not "abbreviating" if the information you intentionally omit disproves your entire point; that is just called "lying".', '>>{NorseGod} : But it was funny when I said to my friends!', ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Those racists at Breitbart can't learn any science, huh?", '>>{TOMapleLaughs} : Meme politics, twitter, and bad speech writing has exposed those politicians suffering from dementia. Confirmed.', '>>{letdogsvote} : People with spliced rat DNA often have trouble with vocabulary.', '>>{NotAnHiro} : Since he only said it in his head, does that mean his friends are imaginary?', '>>{throwawatc123} : Oh, and "Bush kept us safe". That\'s like saying "I\'m a virgin, except for that one weekend-long orgy in college".', '>>{turtledan87} : While what they did was pretty cool, I really don\'t want to see serious news sites start using the word "burn" in their titles.', ">>{ubix} : Must have been Hillary's *liberrrruhl mind beams* that made him say that. /s", '>>{beermile} : Agreed, they should have referenced the topic by saying "Weather Channel *sunburns* Breitbart for using its videos to deny climate change"', '>>{throwawatc123} : According to Republican revisionist history books, Bill Clinton was president on September 11, 2001. He was too busy sitting in a classroom reading My Pet Goat while Monica Lewinsky was sucking his dick to save those 3000 Americans.', ">>{Gutenborg} : I remember that. Weren't all the kids wearing berets?", '>>{beermile} : Yeah? Well I only have two words in response: Hire Temperature', ">>{266214c354} : I'd climb it, but some of the places I would want to climb will be underwater thanks to dumbfuck republicans.", ">>{CarmineFields} : Exactly, and he's told the lie before. Someone had to point out the error of his ways.", '>>{themanosaur} : Yup...this guy...this guy is one of the many that caused this.', ">>{SamJSchoenberg} : Yes, we all know that Giuliani didn't __literally__ forget about 9/11, but the fact remains that he seems to think that 9/11 somehow doesn't count, perhaps because he assumes it to be the origin of Islamic terror attacks.", ">>{avapxia} : You're not wrong: [He claims to be 80](https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/5gfihp/dear_50_year_old_redditors_what_advice_would_you/das22qt/). Or maybe he just pretends to be an ignorant old man online.", '>>{DTX41} : Poor them I have something similar called "we just gave a temperamental child the nuclear codes" anxiety.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{coolcrosby} : Rudy Giuliani blames 9/11-forget gaffe on 'abbreviated' language", ">>{CarmineFields} : I'm 100% sure this isn't the first time Guiliani made that statement I'm going to try finding it but it'll be hard because of all the articles on what he just said. Edit: [Bingo!!!](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/jan/08/rudy-giuliani/giuliani-says-there-were-no-domestic-attacks-durin/)", '>>{IrishJoe} : So what about the other radical Islamic terrorist attacks on US soil during the Bush presidency like the LAX attack in 2002 9 months after passage of the Patriot Act??? Giuliani claimed there were no such attacks during the Bush presidency.', ">>{throwawatc123} : Everything good that happens is thanks to Republicans. Everything bad that happens is because of Democrats. 9/11, Benghazi, Iraq, Afghanistan, the 2008 recession, the sack of Rome, and Trump's inability to score with Ivanka are all Clinton and Obama's fault. But bin Laden's death was all thanks to Special George. Ladies and gentlemen, the party of personal responsibility.", '>>{jephjo} : Obviously Barack Hussain Obama incited those to rise to power.', '>>{jephjo} : The Jon Stewart segment on the rush to claim credit for Bin Laden was great in that regard.', '>>{J_WalterWeatherman_} : It\'s not "abbreviating" if the information you intentionally omit disproves your entire point; that is just called "lying".', '>>{TOMapleLaughs} : Meme politics, twitter, and bad speech writing has exposed those politicians suffering from dementia. Confirmed.', '>>{letdogsvote} : People with spliced rat DNA often have trouble with vocabulary.', '>>{throwawatc123} : Oh, and "Bush kept us safe". That\'s like saying "I\'m a virgin, except for that one weekend-long orgy in college".', ">>{ubix} : Must have been Hillary's *liberrrruhl mind beams* that made him say that. /s", '>>{throwawatc123} : According to Republican revisionist history books, Bill Clinton was president on September 11, 2001. He was too busy sitting in a classroom reading My Pet Goat while Monica Lewinsky was sucking his dick to save those 3000 Americans.', ">>{Gutenborg} : I remember that. Weren't all the kids wearing berets?", ">>{CarmineFields} : Exactly, and he's told the lie before. Someone had to point out the error of his ways.", ">>{SamJSchoenberg} : Yes, we all know that Giuliani didn't __literally__ forget about 9/11, but the fact remains that he seems to think that 9/11 somehow doesn't count, perhaps because he assumes it to be the origin of Islamic terror attacks."], ['>>{tonto515} : Weather Channel burns Breitbart for using its videos to deny climate change', '>>{BalaaClaava} : I have two words for those who think climate change is our number 1 priority. Climb it.', '>>{buckbuck2dabang} : I bet that sounded more clever in your head.', '>>{MakingAmericaGreat4U} : Having lived in southeast asia for a year, it would suck if the west gets warmer than it is now. I miss the cold temperatures from the 90s.', ">>{GrumpyBearBank} : I have two words to describe people who don't think climate change should be a top priority. Obviously, elderly. Also climb it was really bad wordplay.", '>>{NorseGod} : But it was funny when I said to my friends!', ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Those racists at Breitbart can't learn any science, huh?", '>>{NotAnHiro} : Since he only said it in his head, does that mean his friends are imaginary?', '>>{turtledan87} : While what they did was pretty cool, I really don\'t want to see serious news sites start using the word "burn" in their titles.', '>>{beermile} : Agreed, they should have referenced the topic by saying "Weather Channel *sunburns* Breitbart for using its videos to deny climate change"', '>>{beermile} : Yeah? Well I only have two words in response: Hire Temperature', ">>{266214c354} : I'd climb it, but some of the places I would want to climb will be underwater thanks to dumbfuck republicans.", '>>{themanosaur} : Yup...this guy...this guy is one of the many that caused this.', ">>{avapxia} : You're not wrong: [He claims to be 80](https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/5gfihp/dear_50_year_old_redditors_what_advice_would_you/das22qt/). Or maybe he just pretends to be an ignorant old man online.", '>>{DTX41} : Poor them I have something similar called "we just gave a temperamental child the nuclear codes" anxiety.']]

classify and reply

[">>{DoremusJessup} : Christie, Giuliani: If Trump didn't pay taxes, he's 'genius'", '>>{Ulaven} : It sounds like the Trump Surrogates have their marching orders from The Donald. From "smart" to "genius" in less than a week. That\'s some spin there.', '>>{IDFSHILL} : Stein is an absolute loon of the highest caliber. The fact she gets any media attention at all is cringe.', '>>{Just_An_Average_j0e} : From Hillary Clinton, Disturbing echoes of Henry Kissinger and George Bush.', '>>{DubTeeDub} : Yeah, she holds way too many anti-science positions (anti-vax, pro-homeopathy, anti-GMO).', '>>{Ulaven} : Keep trying to spin the fact that Donnie lost almost a **billion dollars** in one year into "genius".', ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Yesterday, the California legislature passed the largest gas tax increase in state history in a move projected to raise $52 billion over 10 years to fix the state's crumbling roads, bridges, and public transit systems. The state already has some of the highest gas taxes in the country. But the falling price of gas, increased fuel efficiency, and the popularity of hybrid and electric vehicles has recently crimped tax revenues, contributing to an estimated $135 billion backlog in road and bridge repairs. The new tax is designed to plug that gap with a 12-cent per gallon increase in the gas tax, as well as new taxes on diesel fuel, a $100 annual fee for electric cars, and higher vehicle registration fees. Progressive taxes and public investment have such a better track record than a rich-dictated system", ">>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : Raise taxes on fuel one day. Complain about oil companies jacking up prices the next. It's the Californian way", ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Sadly these taxes are regressive in that they're largely consumption taxes.", '>>{livecono} : A bit of a muddled argument. Stein is way off, writes Milbank, for rejecting the "lesser of two evils" approach to voting in presidential elections, which even Noam Chomsky subscribes to. She is also way off, the argument continues, for, among other things, stating that the United States is the most violent nation on earth. But of course Noam Chomsky does subscribe to [that view](http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/27201-the-leading-terrorist-state).', '>>{dagrave} : We pay SO MANY taxes already. I wish I was able to vote on this!', ">>{BringMeToHeel} : HAHAHA, nice try Donald. If Trump is a genius Hillary must be a Goddess. This is low level stuff Trump is bragging about. I'd like to see him try making $110 million in political speeches and manipulating the State Department as a funnel for personal enrichment from foreign governments. The best part is, after that, try convincing people you're for the working class and aren't controlled by special interests, LMAO. I can't wait till the Queen is president.", '>>{gunslingrburrito} : Yet another Stein smear piece. And you gotta love that myth that Nader elected Bush- Democrats have gotten a lot of mileage out of that lie.', ">>{misscee} : For many folks the echoes aren't disturbing. I'm voting for Jill precisely because I wish I had voted for Ralph Nader in 2000. I'm not voting for a lying crooked party who ~~cheated~~ used their party machinery to conspire against me (a member who actually gave quite a bit of money to the party since the 2000 election as well as phone banked and canvassed for their candidates) ... who is getting all those GOPers to say that they're #withher... other people can ... but not me. I'm not a Democrat anymore and they can run their pie holes all day and it won't change my mind.", '>>{drucifer27} : Not to mention she has: - Stated that she thinks WiFi is harmful to children - Stated that she considers the use of computers in schools to be a corporate conspiracy - Picked a running mate who has called Bernie Sanders a warmongering white supremacist imperialist and called Barack Obama an Uncle Tom twice (which Stein refused to disavow). - Stated that as president she would use Quantitative Easing (a power which the president does not have) to eliminate all student debt (which QE cannot do) because it was used to eliminate bank debt (which is not what it did). Oh, and also the fact that her sum total of relevant experience is a few years on local city council.', '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Get a job that pays around $60k and you can afford $1.5k in rent. Mostly we get roommates though and spend about $1k a month each on a bedroom that barely fits a queen bed and a dresser.', '>>{DubTeeDub} : What specific qualifications does Jill Stein have to be President? What elected offices has she ever held?', '>>{DubTeeDub} : shes such a joke, I dont get how anyone can support her', '>>{suddenlypandabear} : Yea, the guy who speaks english at a 5th grade level is a genius. Ok.', ">>{ofchiai} : Yes but it's difficult to have exclusively progressive taxes. If I'm not mistaken, California is also looking to pass a tax exclusively on income over $1m in order to make public colleges tuition free.", ">>{freecavitycreep} : They can afford it because they don't make minimum wage, and salaries are adjusted to match cost-of-living. If I make $50K in the Midwest, I'd make 3x that on the East/West coast.", ">>{thiscouldbemassive} : So stupid on so many levels. He didn't pay taxes because he fucking ran his businesses into the ground with bad decisions. Secondly, Trump hasn't done his own taxes in probably ever. He paid a tax attorney, probably a team of them, who found him a loop hole. This is like saying he's a genius for dressing himself in the morning -- though honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if has hired help for that as well.", ">>{GeriatriCroc} : Sounds like college to me... Relevant username? I'd want to take a vacation from a bunch of roommates.", ">>{GodfreyLongbeard} : Good. That's the right level of government to tax for, build, and maintain their own road system.", '>>{livecono} : All the candidates are [anti-science](http://www.democracynow.org/2016/8/17/why_did_clinton_just_tap_a) in one way or another.', ">>{OliveItMaggle} : I thought you greens *wanted* to be taken seriously? So don't complain about how Jill looks under scrutiny; you picked a terrible candidate.", ">>{AL-RIHAE} : Don't forget about our stupid gun laws. Out of all the states I've lived in (6 states) California is the worst. Only good thing is the beach and mountains.", '>>{roboboogienights} : It\'s true, only "genius" Donald Trump knows how to work the loopholes. Puh-leez. There\'s a whole industry devoted to helping you do it.', ">>{TheC0zmo} : Hillary's State Dept lost six billion taxpayer dollars. But lefties whine about Trump losing a billion of his own money. http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/4/state-dept-misplaced-6b-under-hillary-clinton-ig-r/", '>>{Ulaven} : Nobody is whining about anything. Just pointing out that " genius and successful businessman Trump" lost nearly a billion dollars in a single tax year. Keep up the whataboutism. That\'s going to work out I\'m sure.', ">>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : California is a great place to visit. That's it.", '>>{thegoodvibe} : Yes, but only Trump and Stein went balls to the wall anti-science.', '>>{amnotrussian} : 1500.00 a month for a one bedroom is a steal in San Francisco.', ">>{zherok} : It's always weird to me to hear gun proponents act as if anywhere could be made better if only there were more guns there. Can't say I missed them growing up in California. And after spending about a year abroad in a country where even the cops aren't often armed only more so.", '>>{NotTheRealKenM} : I think trying to close revenue shortfall through this kind of basic consumption tax is a Sisyphean task. People will drive less and seek further efficiency, which is how we got here in the first place. Higher gas taxes and registration fees are going to hit the working class the hardest.', '>>{livecono} : I do some [reading](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/20/jill-stein-green-party-climate-state-of-emergency) outside of Reddit comments, you know.', '>>{TheC0zmo} : It\'s not "whataboutism." It\'s pointing out that when "the most qualified presidential candidate ever" ran the State Department, they lost six times the amount Trump lost.', '>>{Ulaven} : You\'re right, it\'s not whataboutism, it\'s an outright lie. What happened was that **files** for over $6 billion worth of contracts from 2008 to 2014 — spanning the entirety of Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 — "were incomplete or could not be located at all." Misfiled contract paperwork, not "lost" $6 billion. So the State Department was terrible at paperwork. The $6 billion figure refers to the total amount affected by file mismanagement. It’s akin to spending $20 on lunch and losing or not asking for a receipt. Documentation over where that $20 went was lost, but not the $20 itself. Pants on fire.', ">>{TheC0zmo} : The Office of Inspector General didn't see it as merely misfiling paperwork. But what do they know? https://oig.state.gov/system/files/224580.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwi0nOKOz77PAhVCLSYKHV3kBpwQFggbMAA&usg=AFQjCNGcGkEEXosN0xkcuu12N_H5Zc5XCw&sig2=h4AN-X1tIX5UVhp-U0NSaw", '>>{Ulaven} : Page not found.. Surprise. Inspector General Steve Linick penned a clarification in the Washington Post because conservatives were spinning this so hard. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/about-the-state-depts-missing-6-billion/2014/04/13/a6130790-c194-11e3-9ee7-02c1e10a03f0_story.html >"Some have concluded based on this that $6 billion is missing. The alert, however, did not draw that conclusion. Instead, it found that the failure to adequately maintain contract files — documents necessary to ensure the full accounting of U.S. tax dollars — ‘creates significant financial risk and demonstrates a lack of internal control over the Department’s contract actions.’ "', ">>{TheC0zmo} : What's really a huge surprise is that an Obama appointee would jump to Hillary's defense. Not sure why the link didn't work at first, but here it is again without Linick's commentary. oig.state.gov/system/files/224580.pdf.", '>>{Ulaven} : Nothing in that report says anything about missing money just missing or incomplete contract files, exactly as Linick clarified. So no, The State Department didn\'t "lose $6 billion", they didn\'t keep adequate contract records. YUGE difference.', ">>{livecono} : Some of us do find the Clinton corruption so [completely disgusting](http://bigstory.ap.org/article/5d63315e296f49668a0d50a3dc4e9576/many-donors-clinton-foundation-met-her-state) we cannot bring ourselves to vote for her. If she loses to Trump it's her own fault, not Jill Stein's and not mine.", ">>{TheC0zmo} : It's $6 billion in taxpayer money for which Hillary's State Dept failed to properly account. But, by all means, continue to harp on Trump for investing and losing his own money 21 years ago. Imagine if Trump's company decided not to properly account for $6 billion. If Trump's accountants were as bad as the ones working for Hillary at the State Department, hypocrite liberals would be demanding Trump's people pay YUGE fines or go to prison. But since it's only taxpayer money Hillary's subordinates decided wasn't important enough to keep up with, who gives a damn?", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : You are able to vote on it. That's the representative system I wish I could vote on whether to allow Don near missiles or not", ">>{thegoodvibe} : I don't doubt it. And I never said they are full anti-science, as Jill Stein being a doctor would be ridiculous if she were fully against it. My statement was that the amount of things Jill doesn't agree with science on is A LOT higher than Clinton and Gary.", '>>{livecono} : Everyone prioritizes. Stein prioritizes climate change over vaccines. The Obama administration [prioritized](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/11/cia-fake-vaccinations-osama-bin-ladens-dna) capturing bin Laden over vaccines.', ">>{other_suns} : That's not evidence of corruption, it's just a correlation, and an unsurprising one at that, given how large the list of individuals and companies that have donated to the Clinton Foundation is. But I guess if you're anti-science you probably don't see much value in evidence either.", ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : If you honestly think the DNC wasn't shady and unfair, then you are being intellectually dishonest. You're nothing more than a cheer leader who will support even the most heinous of acts by deluding yourself.", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : > People will drive less and seek further efficiency Only the middle class The owners don't care about these increases, and they're the prime consumers anyway", '>>{chlomyster} : Salaries arent close to adjusted enough to afford the housing prices.', '>>{skidmarkeddrawers} : out of curiosity how was Sanders cheated? because someone sent some emails in May questioning whether he was a practicing Jew?', ">>{skankenstein} : If I'm doing the math correctly, a 12 cent per gallon increase is about $85 extra a year for me. I'm totally down with spending $85 a year not to destroy my suspension/tires on crumbling roads.", '>>{baronvonflapjack} : Suits me just fine if you want to come here, pay some state tax, and leave.', '>>{baronvonflapjack} : Hahahaha. I have a shitty 2br apartment that was built in the mid-eighties. 900 sq ft. My rent is $2400/mo. SoCal.', ">>{freecavitycreep} : From what I understand, there are a lot of areas that even a six-figure salary wouldn't be able to afford. Basically the more money you make, the closer you can be to your job/the city, and so people making minimum wage live hours outside of the city. I'm thinking primarily of San Francisco, though.", '>>{washedrope5} : Not true, CA has a huge poverty rate when actual cost of living is factored in. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2016/09/28/why-does-california-have-the-nations-highest-poverty-rate/amp/', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : You already know the answers. You've heard them before, but you wont see them as cheating. Everyone knew the DNC was rigging the system in Hillary's favor from the very start. They weren't doing their job of being unbiased.", ">>{baronvonflapjack} : Yes and no, because I also have a massive California income tax to deal with. My salary is $30k more than when I lived out of state, but my take home isn't much higher. Add to that my old mortgage was around $1400 and now rent is $2400, and it takes a bite no matter what.", ">>{livecono} : Pandering is pretty common too. You're pandering to [conspiracy theorists](http://www.snopes.com/is-green-party-candidate-jill-stein-anti-vaccine/), for example: >it's not true to say that she is on record as holding an anti-vaccination political position", ">>{freecavitycreep} : I didn't mean to imply that there wasn't an affect on poverty. The cost of housing in CA has a tremendous impact on that, as evidenced by your link! Since the housing costs are so high, minimum wage employees are more likely to lose out. Meanwhile, salaried employees have an adjusted income to make up for the massive cost-of-living increase, and even then that sometimes isn't enough.", '>>{livecono} : Quid pro quo means "a favor or advantage granted or expected in return for something". What do you think it means?', '>>{Skippyscreamy} : Honestly this. I ride a motorcycle and my girlfriend drives a small car. This 12 cent increase wont kill me. If it produces a significant improvement to infrastructure, Im all for it. I would only wish that there was some type of program to monitor how the funds are being used, and to publish a list of infrastructure projects that have successfully been funded that the public can acess.', ">>{thatoneguy889} : Have a high paying job, have more than one source of income, or live in a shitty neighborhood. I'm from an LA suburb, and even the studio apartments in sketchy areas tend to be around $900 a month.", ">>{drforpretend} : Consumption taxes on luxury items are far less regressive than standard sales taxes. For instance, taxing marijuana sales, gas, alcohol, tobacco sugar, and jewelry don't stop poorer people from surviving. In fact, it probably adds years to their life and only takes money from people who are already making enough.", ">>{other_suns} : Roughly 0.02% of Clinton Foundation donors met with Hillary. So it's pretty safe to say they had no expectations around access.", ">>{AL-RIHAE} : I never said there should be more guns. The gun laws here are too much and don't work. Background checks for ammo? (starting in 2018 I believe) Come on. Compare per capita gu related homicides in Texas which has reasonable gun laws and California which does not. I'll give you a hint, California is higher. But this isn't the right thread to be discussing this.", '>>{RidleyScotch} : Nuclear power plants are WMDs - Jill Stein', ">>{zherok} : I'm all for more effective gun laws, but let's be honest, you're not pining for a less gun accessible California either way. More guns still seems implied to me.", ">>{other_suns} : That doesn't disagree with what I said. Pandering is different from holding a political position.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : As I look out over the Pacific Ocean from my office, I forget these opinions exist.', ">>{druuconian} : > I'm not a Democrat anymore Or at all to begin with", ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : We can afford rent (it's a highly efficient market due to the high volume and annual turnover). Affording a down payment for a home however - that's another story.", '>>{chlomyster} : Thats what I meant. I can afford L.A. rent with my good job but if I want to own a place its going to take a long time with a starter condo in an area id rather not be in that i have to pour money into for years.', ">>{druuconian} : It's most assuredly not a myth. Without Nader on the ballot there is a very good chance Gore would have won Florida. The idea that a few hundred of Nader's voter wouldn't have backed Gore is the real lie.", ">>{DubTeeDub} : It's totally reasonable to blame Ralph Nader for Gore's loss.", ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : How did they rig it. Let's start with 1 example.", ">>{U_Buttonhooked_Me} : Yet here in Ory-Gun I woke up to a 25¢ increase overnight, locally. Trump's pretend war is inflating gas prices.", '>>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : I payed enough in income, sales, and property tax for 10 years. When I said good bye to California I said fucking good bye.', '>>{drforpretend} : What with electric vehicles and public transit, for some areas it is. For places out in rural farm country, I agree. That stuff right now should be done at a local, not even state wide basis.', '>>{alephnul} : Things that "everybody knows" are very seldom correct. We tend to put more credence in things that actually have some proof attached to them. Those are the things that get you indicted.', '>>{Chelsea_Alt} : Hell yes. I would gladly pay a lot more for gas if it means fewer cars on the freeway.', '>>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : Hillary was a big name candidate with deep ties to the DNC, including a chair who is extremely close to her. Hillary was also way ahead in the polls, meanwhile her only credible threat was a no-name liberal from Vermont. If you want to help the less known candidates, and fairly allow the people vet the candidates, you have a lot of debates so their message can get out there. Instead, they chose a historic low of 6 debates, all of which were scheduled at odd times when people are less likely to watch. From day one, before all the emails, people were saying, "WTF? That\'s odd. That clearly is a schedule which favors Clinton." And it shocked no one, considering the chair was her former campaign manager. It was obviously intentional.', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : Yeah, the person who scheduled 6 debates during odd time slots, when there was an emerging underdog candidate who needed exposure, by no means tried to do that to help the person she last ran a presidential campaign for. No way. But there is no smoking gun. Like all politicians, they make sure to have plausible deniability. Politicians tend not to be dumb enough to leave around a smoking gun. You're so incredibly naive. This is for the highest office in the land. It's always filled with shady shit. You don't need to constantly defend politicians just because they are in your party.", '>>{alephnul} : Your claim was that Hillary and the DNC "cheated". Cheating is a specific thing and generally has consequences. When pressed for an example, the closest you have come is to name the scheduling of the debates as an example. You don\'t understand what cheating is. If you can\'t play hard ball politics, then you don\'t deserve to be in the Presidential race. Whining because everything wasn\'t done in the manner best suited to showcase your favorite candidate does not prove cheating.', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : That was just one example. How about DWS going on TV blasting Sanders over the Las Vegas event, when she knew she was being dishonest, just to blast him on TV. She knew the media was spinning it against Sanders, but still fed into their spin and narrative. These are all underhanded, and is a form of cheating. She's supposed to be fair to all candidates to give them an equal shot, but she worked hard every step of the way to ensure Sanders was limping into each battle.", ">>{alephnul} : Aaawwww poor little Bernie.... I understand that you guys are butt hurt because your guy lost, but if you want to play the politics game you are just going to have to put your big boy pants on and get over it. Politics is a rough game and somebody loses every time. Sometimes it's your guy. It's not because anybody cheated. It's because your guy lost.", '>>{dare3000} : Some of what you claim is false (she\'s not anti-vax, and the pro-homeo position biols down to them saying, "we support conventional medicine and complementary, integrative and licensed alternative health care approaches" OMG how crazy right?). For the things I disagree with her on, like GMOs, it\'s much less relevant than the appearance of corruption (DNC and DWS), incompetence and carelessness (FBI called it), hawkishness (Iraq and Syria), integrity (switching to popular positions when the polls say it\'s safe, then calling that "pragmatic incrementalism") and honesty (my fav was her claim she was dodging sniper fire on the tarmac), all issues I have with Clinton.', '>>{dare3000} : The thing is most "analysis" of her doesn\'t take her positions into account. It\'s all "ARE YOU SCARED OF TRUMP!?!? THEN CLINTON IS THE ONLY ANSWER!!! AHHHHHHH!!!!"', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : I like how you'll continue to justify shadiness. Go on. Continue.", '>>{alephnul} : I am glad that you have discovered politics. Watch a few more campaigns and eventually you will sort out how it works. Or, if you have time in home room, ask your civics teacher.', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : LOL are you always this condescending to people you don't know? This isn't my first rodeo. What is it with so many Clinton supporters who like to attack the character of the supporter? It's a common theme. It's incredibly rude and childish.", ">>{LD50-Cent} : Are you honestly surprised that DWS went on TV and had some harsh words for Bernie after he released a statement about the convention that was full of misinformation about what actually happened? The notion that Bernie should be allowed to be as antagonistic to the DNC as possible without any kind of consequence is absurd. He only joined to get access to their campaign infrastructure and then called them corrupt every chance he got, I can't possibly imagine why some of the staff might have preferred Hillary.", '>>{drucifer27} : Points 1 and 2: [US Presidential Candidate Jill Stein thinks wi-fi is a threat to children\'s health](http://www.sciencealert.com/us-presidential-candidate-jill-stein-thinks-wi-fi-is-a-threat-to-children-s-health) Point 3: [Sanders’ campaign, Baraka wrote, was less concerned about actual political reform and more interested in a tacit “commitment to Eurocentrism and normalized white supremacy.” "It should be obvious that his campaign is an ideological prop – albeit from a center/left position – of the logic and interests of the capitalist-imperialist settler state."](http://fusion.net/story/332652/jill-stein-ajamu-baraka-beyonce/) 3 (cont). [Here](https://m.mic.com/articles/151914/jill-stein-s-vp-doubles-down-on-calling-obama-uncle-tom-in-truly-wild-town-hall#.eIoicAMYb) is Baraka doubling down on calling Obama an Uncle Tom during CNN\'s Green Party Town Hall and Stein refusing to disavow the statement. Point 4: She said this during her Reddit AMA. [Here is a link](https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/4ixbr5/i_am_jill_stein_green_party_candidate_for/d31wgws) to the original question, her response, and her rather uninformed response being dismantled point by point.', ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : > Instead, they chose a historic low of 6 debates, all of which were scheduled at odd times when people are less likely to watch. I'm gonna stop you right there. 1) There were 9 debates and 23 forums. 2) **All** of them were scheduled to be in prime time. 3) The most common day scheduled was Thursday, the day most people watch TV. Likewise, none of them were on Friday, the day the least people watch TV.", ">>{misscee} : You're probably right ... but that sure didn't stop them from taking my money and letting me go to their Jefferson Jackson dinners and rally and phone bank and canvass for their sorry asses.", '>>{dare3000} : Ok, here we go. Point 1 "WiFi" - It\'s true that EMF is bullshit, but it isn\'t true that concerns about RF exposure are just crank nonsense. It isn\'t just based on nothing. World governments, as Stein said in the vid, [have taken action on this](http://ehtrust.org/policy/international-policy-actions-on-wireless/). [America has too](http://www.metlabs.com/sar/politicians-push-specific-absorption-rate-sar-labeling-for-cell-phones/). The concern about it isn\'t just Stein\'s delusions, they have [some basis in fact](http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/business/14digi.html). The real story here is that RF levels can be harmful, and children are especially sensitive, but the RF levels coming off common cells and wifi devices are too low to be dangerous. Stein is behind the times and a bit unnuanced on the facts, but not simply crazy. Point 2 - Her main point about computers in school was that screens have some negative effect on kids socially and cognitively. I\'d need to see more research on that, but it doesn\'t strike me as crazy to say "we need to move away from screens being in the faces of kids at school all day". As for the part about corporations using the (what could be decent) policy of adding tech to more schools to make a buck, that isn\'t so out there either. Point 3 - I don\'t know what Baraka means when he says Sanders has a "documented support of empire", and I\'d probably disagree. Could he mean something about support for Isreal? The point is that simply saying "he said mean stuff about Sanders!" isn\'t enough for me to be like, "oh, he must be wrong then" Maybe Sanders does support empire, but I doubt it. 3 (cont.) - Same with Obama. Don\'t like the term "Uncle Tom"? I understand. I didn\'t like when a comedian called him "my nigga" either. It\'s disrepectful for sure, but there\'s substance behind the rhetoric. I\'ll let Baraka speak for himself here: >What I wanted to do was basically to tell people who had this hope in Barack Obama, that if we were concerned and serious about how we could displace white power, we had to demystify the policies and the positions of this individual," Baraka said. "So that was how it got framed, to shock people into a more critical look at this individual, and that\'s how I did it, and I stand by that."" Has Obama been bad for the black community? Has he been too eager to seek the approval of whites? That\'s the issue here, not what offensive term Baraka used. For my part, I do think Obama wasted much of his time trying to bargain with Repubs who had no intention of doing the same, but I wouldn\'t call him an Uncle Tom. Stein followed that up with "I understand his frustrations..." a tactful answer that doesn\'t endorse the language but maybe endorses the ideas behind them. Not telling a marginalized person how to express their anger at being oppressed, this is liberal SJW basics 101. I don\'t agree with it tho. Point 4 - Now this is the real killer. I don\'t think she has a good plan for cancelling student debt, except a vague "just do what they did for the big banks!" and "QE, that\'ll do it". I think here she seems her most unintelligent, and I can\'t really muster any defense for her. Maybe her plan can be tweaked and saved, but fuck it she\'s not paying me to do that. (I don\'t think, BTW, anyone else has a better plan. She should\'ve just stuck with "we\'re gonna make the rich pay their fair share of taxes", which is only slightly less empty but plays well to the public). So what\'s my point? It\'s not to say Stein is perfect, but this Harvard trained doctor isn\'t just pulling everything she says out her ass. Some of it has some basis, albeit very little. But even if she\'s totally wrong on GMOs and the like, and is a walking Portlandia sketch, they\'re other issues one could agree with her on over others. edits: grammar and spelling, and adding links.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{DoremusJessup} : Christie, Giuliani: If Trump didn't pay taxes, he's 'genius'", '>>{Ulaven} : It sounds like the Trump Surrogates have their marching orders from The Donald. From "smart" to "genius" in less than a week. That\'s some spin there.', '>>{Ulaven} : Keep trying to spin the fact that Donnie lost almost a **billion dollars** in one year into "genius".', ">>{BringMeToHeel} : HAHAHA, nice try Donald. If Trump is a genius Hillary must be a Goddess. This is low level stuff Trump is bragging about. I'd like to see him try making $110 million in political speeches and manipulating the State Department as a funnel for personal enrichment from foreign governments. The best part is, after that, try convincing people you're for the working class and aren't controlled by special interests, LMAO. I can't wait till the Queen is president.", '>>{suddenlypandabear} : Yea, the guy who speaks english at a 5th grade level is a genius. Ok.', ">>{thiscouldbemassive} : So stupid on so many levels. He didn't pay taxes because he fucking ran his businesses into the ground with bad decisions. Secondly, Trump hasn't done his own taxes in probably ever. He paid a tax attorney, probably a team of them, who found him a loop hole. This is like saying he's a genius for dressing himself in the morning -- though honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if has hired help for that as well.", '>>{roboboogienights} : It\'s true, only "genius" Donald Trump knows how to work the loopholes. Puh-leez. There\'s a whole industry devoted to helping you do it.', ">>{TheC0zmo} : Hillary's State Dept lost six billion taxpayer dollars. But lefties whine about Trump losing a billion of his own money. http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/4/state-dept-misplaced-6b-under-hillary-clinton-ig-r/", '>>{Ulaven} : Nobody is whining about anything. Just pointing out that " genius and successful businessman Trump" lost nearly a billion dollars in a single tax year. Keep up the whataboutism. That\'s going to work out I\'m sure.', '>>{TheC0zmo} : It\'s not "whataboutism." It\'s pointing out that when "the most qualified presidential candidate ever" ran the State Department, they lost six times the amount Trump lost.', '>>{Ulaven} : You\'re right, it\'s not whataboutism, it\'s an outright lie. What happened was that **files** for over $6 billion worth of contracts from 2008 to 2014 — spanning the entirety of Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 — "were incomplete or could not be located at all." Misfiled contract paperwork, not "lost" $6 billion. So the State Department was terrible at paperwork. The $6 billion figure refers to the total amount affected by file mismanagement. It’s akin to spending $20 on lunch and losing or not asking for a receipt. Documentation over where that $20 went was lost, but not the $20 itself. Pants on fire.', ">>{TheC0zmo} : The Office of Inspector General didn't see it as merely misfiling paperwork. But what do they know? https://oig.state.gov/system/files/224580.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwi0nOKOz77PAhVCLSYKHV3kBpwQFggbMAA&usg=AFQjCNGcGkEEXosN0xkcuu12N_H5Zc5XCw&sig2=h4AN-X1tIX5UVhp-U0NSaw", '>>{Ulaven} : Page not found.. Surprise. Inspector General Steve Linick penned a clarification in the Washington Post because conservatives were spinning this so hard. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/about-the-state-depts-missing-6-billion/2014/04/13/a6130790-c194-11e3-9ee7-02c1e10a03f0_story.html >"Some have concluded based on this that $6 billion is missing. The alert, however, did not draw that conclusion. Instead, it found that the failure to adequately maintain contract files — documents necessary to ensure the full accounting of U.S. tax dollars — ‘creates significant financial risk and demonstrates a lack of internal control over the Department’s contract actions.’ "', ">>{TheC0zmo} : What's really a huge surprise is that an Obama appointee would jump to Hillary's defense. Not sure why the link didn't work at first, but here it is again without Linick's commentary. oig.state.gov/system/files/224580.pdf.", '>>{Ulaven} : Nothing in that report says anything about missing money just missing or incomplete contract files, exactly as Linick clarified. So no, The State Department didn\'t "lose $6 billion", they didn\'t keep adequate contract records. YUGE difference.', ">>{TheC0zmo} : It's $6 billion in taxpayer money for which Hillary's State Dept failed to properly account. But, by all means, continue to harp on Trump for investing and losing his own money 21 years ago. Imagine if Trump's company decided not to properly account for $6 billion. If Trump's accountants were as bad as the ones working for Hillary at the State Department, hypocrite liberals would be demanding Trump's people pay YUGE fines or go to prison. But since it's only taxpayer money Hillary's subordinates decided wasn't important enough to keep up with, who gives a damn?"], [">>{WatchingDonFail} : Yesterday, the California legislature passed the largest gas tax increase in state history in a move projected to raise $52 billion over 10 years to fix the state's crumbling roads, bridges, and public transit systems. The state already has some of the highest gas taxes in the country. But the falling price of gas, increased fuel efficiency, and the popularity of hybrid and electric vehicles has recently crimped tax revenues, contributing to an estimated $135 billion backlog in road and bridge repairs. The new tax is designed to plug that gap with a 12-cent per gallon increase in the gas tax, as well as new taxes on diesel fuel, a $100 annual fee for electric cars, and higher vehicle registration fees. Progressive taxes and public investment have such a better track record than a rich-dictated system", ">>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : Raise taxes on fuel one day. Complain about oil companies jacking up prices the next. It's the Californian way", ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Sadly these taxes are regressive in that they're largely consumption taxes.", '>>{dagrave} : We pay SO MANY taxes already. I wish I was able to vote on this!', '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : Get a job that pays around $60k and you can afford $1.5k in rent. Mostly we get roommates though and spend about $1k a month each on a bedroom that barely fits a queen bed and a dresser.', ">>{ofchiai} : Yes but it's difficult to have exclusively progressive taxes. If I'm not mistaken, California is also looking to pass a tax exclusively on income over $1m in order to make public colleges tuition free.", ">>{freecavitycreep} : They can afford it because they don't make minimum wage, and salaries are adjusted to match cost-of-living. If I make $50K in the Midwest, I'd make 3x that on the East/West coast.", ">>{GeriatriCroc} : Sounds like college to me... Relevant username? I'd want to take a vacation from a bunch of roommates.", ">>{GodfreyLongbeard} : Good. That's the right level of government to tax for, build, and maintain their own road system.", ">>{AL-RIHAE} : Don't forget about our stupid gun laws. Out of all the states I've lived in (6 states) California is the worst. Only good thing is the beach and mountains.", ">>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : California is a great place to visit. That's it.", '>>{amnotrussian} : 1500.00 a month for a one bedroom is a steal in San Francisco.', ">>{zherok} : It's always weird to me to hear gun proponents act as if anywhere could be made better if only there were more guns there. Can't say I missed them growing up in California. And after spending about a year abroad in a country where even the cops aren't often armed only more so.", '>>{NotTheRealKenM} : I think trying to close revenue shortfall through this kind of basic consumption tax is a Sisyphean task. People will drive less and seek further efficiency, which is how we got here in the first place. Higher gas taxes and registration fees are going to hit the working class the hardest.', ">>{WatchingDonFail} : You are able to vote on it. That's the representative system I wish I could vote on whether to allow Don near missiles or not", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : > People will drive less and seek further efficiency Only the middle class The owners don't care about these increases, and they're the prime consumers anyway", '>>{chlomyster} : Salaries arent close to adjusted enough to afford the housing prices.', ">>{skankenstein} : If I'm doing the math correctly, a 12 cent per gallon increase is about $85 extra a year for me. I'm totally down with spending $85 a year not to destroy my suspension/tires on crumbling roads.", '>>{baronvonflapjack} : Suits me just fine if you want to come here, pay some state tax, and leave.', '>>{baronvonflapjack} : Hahahaha. I have a shitty 2br apartment that was built in the mid-eighties. 900 sq ft. My rent is $2400/mo. SoCal.', ">>{freecavitycreep} : From what I understand, there are a lot of areas that even a six-figure salary wouldn't be able to afford. Basically the more money you make, the closer you can be to your job/the city, and so people making minimum wage live hours outside of the city. I'm thinking primarily of San Francisco, though.", '>>{washedrope5} : Not true, CA has a huge poverty rate when actual cost of living is factored in. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2016/09/28/why-does-california-have-the-nations-highest-poverty-rate/amp/', ">>{baronvonflapjack} : Yes and no, because I also have a massive California income tax to deal with. My salary is $30k more than when I lived out of state, but my take home isn't much higher. Add to that my old mortgage was around $1400 and now rent is $2400, and it takes a bite no matter what.", ">>{freecavitycreep} : I didn't mean to imply that there wasn't an affect on poverty. The cost of housing in CA has a tremendous impact on that, as evidenced by your link! Since the housing costs are so high, minimum wage employees are more likely to lose out. Meanwhile, salaried employees have an adjusted income to make up for the massive cost-of-living increase, and even then that sometimes isn't enough.", '>>{Skippyscreamy} : Honestly this. I ride a motorcycle and my girlfriend drives a small car. This 12 cent increase wont kill me. If it produces a significant improvement to infrastructure, Im all for it. I would only wish that there was some type of program to monitor how the funds are being used, and to publish a list of infrastructure projects that have successfully been funded that the public can acess.', ">>{thatoneguy889} : Have a high paying job, have more than one source of income, or live in a shitty neighborhood. I'm from an LA suburb, and even the studio apartments in sketchy areas tend to be around $900 a month.", ">>{drforpretend} : Consumption taxes on luxury items are far less regressive than standard sales taxes. For instance, taxing marijuana sales, gas, alcohol, tobacco sugar, and jewelry don't stop poorer people from surviving. In fact, it probably adds years to their life and only takes money from people who are already making enough.", ">>{AL-RIHAE} : I never said there should be more guns. The gun laws here are too much and don't work. Background checks for ammo? (starting in 2018 I believe) Come on. Compare per capita gu related homicides in Texas which has reasonable gun laws and California which does not. I'll give you a hint, California is higher. But this isn't the right thread to be discussing this.", ">>{zherok} : I'm all for more effective gun laws, but let's be honest, you're not pining for a less gun accessible California either way. More guns still seems implied to me.", '>>{VacationAwayFromWork} : As I look out over the Pacific Ocean from my office, I forget these opinions exist.', ">>{VacationAwayFromWork} : We can afford rent (it's a highly efficient market due to the high volume and annual turnover). Affording a down payment for a home however - that's another story.", '>>{chlomyster} : Thats what I meant. I can afford L.A. rent with my good job but if I want to own a place its going to take a long time with a starter condo in an area id rather not be in that i have to pour money into for years.', ">>{U_Buttonhooked_Me} : Yet here in Ory-Gun I woke up to a 25¢ increase overnight, locally. Trump's pretend war is inflating gas prices.", '>>{Ju5t_My_0pini0n} : I payed enough in income, sales, and property tax for 10 years. When I said good bye to California I said fucking good bye.', '>>{drforpretend} : What with electric vehicles and public transit, for some areas it is. For places out in rural farm country, I agree. That stuff right now should be done at a local, not even state wide basis.', '>>{Chelsea_Alt} : Hell yes. I would gladly pay a lot more for gas if it means fewer cars on the freeway.'], ['>>{IDFSHILL} : Stein is an absolute loon of the highest caliber. The fact she gets any media attention at all is cringe.', '>>{Just_An_Average_j0e} : From Hillary Clinton, Disturbing echoes of Henry Kissinger and George Bush.', '>>{DubTeeDub} : Yeah, she holds way too many anti-science positions (anti-vax, pro-homeopathy, anti-GMO).', '>>{livecono} : A bit of a muddled argument. Stein is way off, writes Milbank, for rejecting the "lesser of two evils" approach to voting in presidential elections, which even Noam Chomsky subscribes to. She is also way off, the argument continues, for, among other things, stating that the United States is the most violent nation on earth. But of course Noam Chomsky does subscribe to [that view](http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/27201-the-leading-terrorist-state).', '>>{gunslingrburrito} : Yet another Stein smear piece. And you gotta love that myth that Nader elected Bush- Democrats have gotten a lot of mileage out of that lie.', ">>{misscee} : For many folks the echoes aren't disturbing. I'm voting for Jill precisely because I wish I had voted for Ralph Nader in 2000. I'm not voting for a lying crooked party who ~~cheated~~ used their party machinery to conspire against me (a member who actually gave quite a bit of money to the party since the 2000 election as well as phone banked and canvassed for their candidates) ... who is getting all those GOPers to say that they're #withher... other people can ... but not me. I'm not a Democrat anymore and they can run their pie holes all day and it won't change my mind.", '>>{drucifer27} : Not to mention she has: - Stated that she thinks WiFi is harmful to children - Stated that she considers the use of computers in schools to be a corporate conspiracy - Picked a running mate who has called Bernie Sanders a warmongering white supremacist imperialist and called Barack Obama an Uncle Tom twice (which Stein refused to disavow). - Stated that as president she would use Quantitative Easing (a power which the president does not have) to eliminate all student debt (which QE cannot do) because it was used to eliminate bank debt (which is not what it did). Oh, and also the fact that her sum total of relevant experience is a few years on local city council.', '>>{DubTeeDub} : What specific qualifications does Jill Stein have to be President? What elected offices has she ever held?', '>>{DubTeeDub} : shes such a joke, I dont get how anyone can support her', '>>{livecono} : All the candidates are [anti-science](http://www.democracynow.org/2016/8/17/why_did_clinton_just_tap_a) in one way or another.', ">>{OliveItMaggle} : I thought you greens *wanted* to be taken seriously? So don't complain about how Jill looks under scrutiny; you picked a terrible candidate.", '>>{thegoodvibe} : Yes, but only Trump and Stein went balls to the wall anti-science.', '>>{livecono} : I do some [reading](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/20/jill-stein-green-party-climate-state-of-emergency) outside of Reddit comments, you know.', ">>{livecono} : Some of us do find the Clinton corruption so [completely disgusting](http://bigstory.ap.org/article/5d63315e296f49668a0d50a3dc4e9576/many-donors-clinton-foundation-met-her-state) we cannot bring ourselves to vote for her. If she loses to Trump it's her own fault, not Jill Stein's and not mine.", ">>{thegoodvibe} : I don't doubt it. And I never said they are full anti-science, as Jill Stein being a doctor would be ridiculous if she were fully against it. My statement was that the amount of things Jill doesn't agree with science on is A LOT higher than Clinton and Gary.", '>>{livecono} : Everyone prioritizes. Stein prioritizes climate change over vaccines. The Obama administration [prioritized](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/11/cia-fake-vaccinations-osama-bin-ladens-dna) capturing bin Laden over vaccines.', ">>{other_suns} : That's not evidence of corruption, it's just a correlation, and an unsurprising one at that, given how large the list of individuals and companies that have donated to the Clinton Foundation is. But I guess if you're anti-science you probably don't see much value in evidence either.", ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : If you honestly think the DNC wasn't shady and unfair, then you are being intellectually dishonest. You're nothing more than a cheer leader who will support even the most heinous of acts by deluding yourself.", '>>{skidmarkeddrawers} : out of curiosity how was Sanders cheated? because someone sent some emails in May questioning whether he was a practicing Jew?', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : You already know the answers. You've heard them before, but you wont see them as cheating. Everyone knew the DNC was rigging the system in Hillary's favor from the very start. They weren't doing their job of being unbiased.", ">>{livecono} : Pandering is pretty common too. You're pandering to [conspiracy theorists](http://www.snopes.com/is-green-party-candidate-jill-stein-anti-vaccine/), for example: >it's not true to say that she is on record as holding an anti-vaccination political position", '>>{livecono} : Quid pro quo means "a favor or advantage granted or expected in return for something". What do you think it means?', ">>{other_suns} : Roughly 0.02% of Clinton Foundation donors met with Hillary. So it's pretty safe to say they had no expectations around access.", '>>{RidleyScotch} : Nuclear power plants are WMDs - Jill Stein', ">>{other_suns} : That doesn't disagree with what I said. Pandering is different from holding a political position.", ">>{druuconian} : > I'm not a Democrat anymore Or at all to begin with", ">>{druuconian} : It's most assuredly not a myth. Without Nader on the ballot there is a very good chance Gore would have won Florida. The idea that a few hundred of Nader's voter wouldn't have backed Gore is the real lie.", ">>{DubTeeDub} : It's totally reasonable to blame Ralph Nader for Gore's loss.", ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : How did they rig it. Let's start with 1 example.", '>>{alephnul} : Things that "everybody knows" are very seldom correct. We tend to put more credence in things that actually have some proof attached to them. Those are the things that get you indicted.', '>>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : Hillary was a big name candidate with deep ties to the DNC, including a chair who is extremely close to her. Hillary was also way ahead in the polls, meanwhile her only credible threat was a no-name liberal from Vermont. If you want to help the less known candidates, and fairly allow the people vet the candidates, you have a lot of debates so their message can get out there. Instead, they chose a historic low of 6 debates, all of which were scheduled at odd times when people are less likely to watch. From day one, before all the emails, people were saying, "WTF? That\'s odd. That clearly is a schedule which favors Clinton." And it shocked no one, considering the chair was her former campaign manager. It was obviously intentional.', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : Yeah, the person who scheduled 6 debates during odd time slots, when there was an emerging underdog candidate who needed exposure, by no means tried to do that to help the person she last ran a presidential campaign for. No way. But there is no smoking gun. Like all politicians, they make sure to have plausible deniability. Politicians tend not to be dumb enough to leave around a smoking gun. You're so incredibly naive. This is for the highest office in the land. It's always filled with shady shit. You don't need to constantly defend politicians just because they are in your party.", '>>{alephnul} : Your claim was that Hillary and the DNC "cheated". Cheating is a specific thing and generally has consequences. When pressed for an example, the closest you have come is to name the scheduling of the debates as an example. You don\'t understand what cheating is. If you can\'t play hard ball politics, then you don\'t deserve to be in the Presidential race. Whining because everything wasn\'t done in the manner best suited to showcase your favorite candidate does not prove cheating.', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : That was just one example. How about DWS going on TV blasting Sanders over the Las Vegas event, when she knew she was being dishonest, just to blast him on TV. She knew the media was spinning it against Sanders, but still fed into their spin and narrative. These are all underhanded, and is a form of cheating. She's supposed to be fair to all candidates to give them an equal shot, but she worked hard every step of the way to ensure Sanders was limping into each battle.", ">>{alephnul} : Aaawwww poor little Bernie.... I understand that you guys are butt hurt because your guy lost, but if you want to play the politics game you are just going to have to put your big boy pants on and get over it. Politics is a rough game and somebody loses every time. Sometimes it's your guy. It's not because anybody cheated. It's because your guy lost.", '>>{dare3000} : Some of what you claim is false (she\'s not anti-vax, and the pro-homeo position biols down to them saying, "we support conventional medicine and complementary, integrative and licensed alternative health care approaches" OMG how crazy right?). For the things I disagree with her on, like GMOs, it\'s much less relevant than the appearance of corruption (DNC and DWS), incompetence and carelessness (FBI called it), hawkishness (Iraq and Syria), integrity (switching to popular positions when the polls say it\'s safe, then calling that "pragmatic incrementalism") and honesty (my fav was her claim she was dodging sniper fire on the tarmac), all issues I have with Clinton.', '>>{dare3000} : The thing is most "analysis" of her doesn\'t take her positions into account. It\'s all "ARE YOU SCARED OF TRUMP!?!? THEN CLINTON IS THE ONLY ANSWER!!! AHHHHHHH!!!!"', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : I like how you'll continue to justify shadiness. Go on. Continue.", '>>{alephnul} : I am glad that you have discovered politics. Watch a few more campaigns and eventually you will sort out how it works. Or, if you have time in home room, ask your civics teacher.', ">>{Circ-Le-Jerk} : LOL are you always this condescending to people you don't know? This isn't my first rodeo. What is it with so many Clinton supporters who like to attack the character of the supporter? It's a common theme. It's incredibly rude and childish.", ">>{LD50-Cent} : Are you honestly surprised that DWS went on TV and had some harsh words for Bernie after he released a statement about the convention that was full of misinformation about what actually happened? The notion that Bernie should be allowed to be as antagonistic to the DNC as possible without any kind of consequence is absurd. He only joined to get access to their campaign infrastructure and then called them corrupt every chance he got, I can't possibly imagine why some of the staff might have preferred Hillary.", '>>{drucifer27} : Points 1 and 2: [US Presidential Candidate Jill Stein thinks wi-fi is a threat to children\'s health](http://www.sciencealert.com/us-presidential-candidate-jill-stein-thinks-wi-fi-is-a-threat-to-children-s-health) Point 3: [Sanders’ campaign, Baraka wrote, was less concerned about actual political reform and more interested in a tacit “commitment to Eurocentrism and normalized white supremacy.” "It should be obvious that his campaign is an ideological prop – albeit from a center/left position – of the logic and interests of the capitalist-imperialist settler state."](http://fusion.net/story/332652/jill-stein-ajamu-baraka-beyonce/) 3 (cont). [Here](https://m.mic.com/articles/151914/jill-stein-s-vp-doubles-down-on-calling-obama-uncle-tom-in-truly-wild-town-hall#.eIoicAMYb) is Baraka doubling down on calling Obama an Uncle Tom during CNN\'s Green Party Town Hall and Stein refusing to disavow the statement. Point 4: She said this during her Reddit AMA. [Here is a link](https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/4ixbr5/i_am_jill_stein_green_party_candidate_for/d31wgws) to the original question, her response, and her rather uninformed response being dismantled point by point.', ">>{ImAHackDontLaugh} : > Instead, they chose a historic low of 6 debates, all of which were scheduled at odd times when people are less likely to watch. I'm gonna stop you right there. 1) There were 9 debates and 23 forums. 2) **All** of them were scheduled to be in prime time. 3) The most common day scheduled was Thursday, the day most people watch TV. Likewise, none of them were on Friday, the day the least people watch TV.", ">>{misscee} : You're probably right ... but that sure didn't stop them from taking my money and letting me go to their Jefferson Jackson dinners and rally and phone bank and canvass for their sorry asses.", '>>{dare3000} : Ok, here we go. Point 1 "WiFi" - It\'s true that EMF is bullshit, but it isn\'t true that concerns about RF exposure are just crank nonsense. It isn\'t just based on nothing. World governments, as Stein said in the vid, [have taken action on this](http://ehtrust.org/policy/international-policy-actions-on-wireless/). [America has too](http://www.metlabs.com/sar/politicians-push-specific-absorption-rate-sar-labeling-for-cell-phones/). The concern about it isn\'t just Stein\'s delusions, they have [some basis in fact](http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/business/14digi.html). The real story here is that RF levels can be harmful, and children are especially sensitive, but the RF levels coming off common cells and wifi devices are too low to be dangerous. Stein is behind the times and a bit unnuanced on the facts, but not simply crazy. Point 2 - Her main point about computers in school was that screens have some negative effect on kids socially and cognitively. I\'d need to see more research on that, but it doesn\'t strike me as crazy to say "we need to move away from screens being in the faces of kids at school all day". As for the part about corporations using the (what could be decent) policy of adding tech to more schools to make a buck, that isn\'t so out there either. Point 3 - I don\'t know what Baraka means when he says Sanders has a "documented support of empire", and I\'d probably disagree. Could he mean something about support for Isreal? The point is that simply saying "he said mean stuff about Sanders!" isn\'t enough for me to be like, "oh, he must be wrong then" Maybe Sanders does support empire, but I doubt it. 3 (cont.) - Same with Obama. Don\'t like the term "Uncle Tom"? I understand. I didn\'t like when a comedian called him "my nigga" either. It\'s disrepectful for sure, but there\'s substance behind the rhetoric. I\'ll let Baraka speak for himself here: >What I wanted to do was basically to tell people who had this hope in Barack Obama, that if we were concerned and serious about how we could displace white power, we had to demystify the policies and the positions of this individual," Baraka said. "So that was how it got framed, to shock people into a more critical look at this individual, and that\'s how I did it, and I stand by that."" Has Obama been bad for the black community? Has he been too eager to seek the approval of whites? That\'s the issue here, not what offensive term Baraka used. For my part, I do think Obama wasted much of his time trying to bargain with Repubs who had no intention of doing the same, but I wouldn\'t call him an Uncle Tom. Stein followed that up with "I understand his frustrations..." a tactful answer that doesn\'t endorse the language but maybe endorses the ideas behind them. Not telling a marginalized person how to express their anger at being oppressed, this is liberal SJW basics 101. I don\'t agree with it tho. Point 4 - Now this is the real killer. I don\'t think she has a good plan for cancelling student debt, except a vague "just do what they did for the big banks!" and "QE, that\'ll do it". I think here she seems her most unintelligent, and I can\'t really muster any defense for her. Maybe her plan can be tweaked and saved, but fuck it she\'s not paying me to do that. (I don\'t think, BTW, anyone else has a better plan. She should\'ve just stuck with "we\'re gonna make the rich pay their fair share of taxes", which is only slightly less empty but plays well to the public). So what\'s my point? It\'s not to say Stein is perfect, but this Harvard trained doctor isn\'t just pulling everything she says out her ass. Some of it has some basis, albeit very little. But even if she\'s totally wrong on GMOs and the like, and is a walking Portlandia sketch, they\'re other issues one could agree with her on over others. edits: grammar and spelling, and adding links.']]

classify and reply

['>>{5411111} : World Net Daily, the most trusted name in news.', ">>{RosesAreBad} : Humiliating Revelation: Trump Aides Spoon-Fed Him Bulls*t So He'd Stay Calm", ">>{kescusay} : I don't doubt it, but couldn't you have used a more reputable source?", '>>{toekknow} : Is every Trump supporting rebuttal essentially, *"No, you!"*???', '>>{zan5ki} : Yup, the same way every Clinton rebuttal is "but, just look at him!".', ">>{Cypher_Blue} : > couldn't you have used a more reputable source? Came here to say this. I didn't even click on the link... EDIT: [Here](http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/staffers-plant-alternative-facts-to-stop-trump-from-tweeting.html) it is in New York Mag.", '>>{altnumber10} : >Put another way, if staffers\xa0want Trump\xa0to\xa0focus on important matters and function like\xa0an adult instead of a wounded child, they\xa0must provide\xa0the most special snowflake in America with a “safe space.” Lol', ">>{Satsuma_President} : I never click on the links! /jk But here I definitely didn't. Thanks for the MYMag link.", '>>{RuneStoneCowboy} : Well known for its anti-Global Warming contest and valuable disinformation campaigns to fix elections. Good catch. Another day. Another victory for 541.', '>>{RuneStoneCowboy} : Yes. Especially between April and October during the presidential election year. Look who the author is....', '>>{GibsonLP86} : [This](http://img.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/whos-a-big-boy-now-720x721.jpg) seems more appropriate every passing day.', ">>{Loffler} : Here's the original report from Politico. The original submission didn't really get any traction here for some reason: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-twitter-staffer-235263", ">>{WienerNuggetLog} : Nominate Bernie, won't be an issue. Hillary has more skeletons than a grave yard. Trump can't find a flaw with Bernie", ">>{oldschoolcool} : When they can't argue against the arguments, they ad hominem the fuck out of news sources not in her corner.", ">>{kevie3drinks} : I use similar tactics to make sure my 12 week old puppy doesn't piss in the house.", '>>{ScienceisMagic} : Humiliating? I believe the correct word is "frightening"', ">>{EuphoriaRush} : It's why he didn't do the debate. Doesn't have enough opposition research of substantial power to create coherent attacks. It would of been a mess.", '>>{Gscarveguy} : They should try spoon feeding him some Valium to take the edge off the crank he does daily!', '>>{strikes_again_haha} : Stones and glass houses and all that. Though the outrage over the issue shouldnt be whos favorite enemy is guilty but that the scam is so normalized both sides are doing it.', ">>{Nomandate} : that's the standard method for dealing with a malignant narcissist you can't separate from. Containment.", '>>{SoTiredOfWinning} : [Hillary University: Bill Clinton Bagged $16.46 Million from For-Profit College as State Dept. Funneled $55 Million Back](http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/02/hillary-university-bill-clinton-bagged-16-46-million-from-for-profit-college-as-state-dept-funneled-55-million-back/)', ">>{invertedwut} : >It's why he didn't do the debate. He didn't accept the debate offer because nobody wanted to both put up the money and host an actual debate.", ">>{kricke} : You must be new to this election. You don't win by going on the defensive.", '>>{invertedwut} : > "but you can\'t *prove* that I knew it was against the law"', '>>{kousi} : [This too](http://i.imgur.com/GjQPWFV.png "No u")', '>>{partanimal} : Right, because in /r/politics we totally have a standard of only posting the original source and not posting the derivative articles. Come on.', '>>{egs1928} : What. A. Fucking. Pussy. Trumps supporters must be so proud of their pissboy.', '>>{PolarVolcano} : ??? Someone put up double the amount Trump requested in return for hosting the debate. Trump chickened out, plain and simple.', ">>{invertedwut} : There were three offers. * a no-name tech company that didn't want to host a debate. they even said it wasn't going to be a debate and instead wanted it to be a dog and pony show where the candidates' messages would be at the whim of the company's agenda. - they offered 10 million. * Somebody from the boxing world wanted to make the event pay-per-view. - he offered 10 million * a few networks agreed to host the debate, and donate advertising proceeds to charity, but would not guarantee the requisite ten million if the advertising money didn't cover it. And then bernie never offered to pay any of it. Plain and simple.", '>>{ademnus} : >"I\'m not a racist I just hate Mexicans"', '>>{McKnotz} : Can the ither candidates stop bickering, there are real people hurting here', ">>{Ritz527} : No it's not. Trump U is a literally fraudulent organization. Walden is, despite being a for profit institution, accredited and had low student loan default rates (suggesting students tend to end up with jobs afterwards). This is a right wing hit piece by a right wing douchebag published on a right wing website.", '>>{invertedwut} : >"I can\'t put together a real argument against border enforcement or deportation of illegals but maybe just calling everyone racist will change their minds"', '>>{ademnus} : >When challenged to explain why he believed the judge was biased, Trump said, “He’s a Mexican.”', '>>{ademnus} : They did valuation reports after they left, and we had thousands and thousands of valuations reports, everyone saying it was great, they loved it, they loved it -I don\'t know if you\'ve ever heard this, but we had thousands of them. [Students say they were coerced to give Trump University positive reviews](http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/272663-students-say-they-were-forced-to-give-trump-university-positive-reviews) "The RNC has treated me very fairly" [Our Republican system is absolutely rigged! It\'s a phony deal!](http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/elections/100000004323931/trump-says-system-is-rigged.html) "When I\'m wrong, I can take criticism better than anyone." [Trump throws tantrum after reporters do their job](http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/01/opinions/donald-trump-tantrum-media-role-louis/) This interview is a fountain of hypocrisy, fli-flops and outright lies.', ">>{invertedwut} : >Students say they were coerced to give Trump University positive reviews I can't possibly imagine why a plaintiff would want to recant his positive feedback for the service he's so unhappy with that he wants to sue. >Our Republican system is absolutely rigged! It's a phony deal! He was asked in the present tense in my link and your link was filmed right after the colorado primary. >Trump throws tantrum after reporters do their job More like reporter-activists getting butthurt and trying to take credit for someone else's philanthropy. Keep trying to push the narrative that the guy willing to get roasted on comedy central is thin skinned. Trump is said to be the most accessible candidate to reporters that they've ever worked with and clinton has gone 6 months without a press conference, yet trump is the thin skinned one for calling a guy that accused him of embezzlement a sleaze. Your post is full of misinformed bullshit.", ">>{ademnus} : >I can't possibly imagine why a plaintiff would want to recant his positive feedback for the service he's so unhappy with that he wants to sue Or all those who are unhappy and didn't sue but were coerced into saying they liked it. Keep making excuses lol >He was asked in the present tense in my link and your link was filmed right after the colorado primary. so it was rigged then and honest now? LOL FLIP FLOP He says whatever he thinks will win him sympathy. >More like reporter-activists getting butthurt and trying to take credit for someone else's philanthropy. Ummmmm no. Reporters asked where the donations were he made a big show about collecting for the veterans he supposedly loves and it turned out he only sent the check the DAY he held the press conference but acted like he had done it months ago LOL >Trump is said to be the most accessible candidate to reporters Sure if you don't mind being called scum LOL", ">>{invertedwut} : >Or all those who are unhappy and didn't sue but were coerced into saying they liked it. Yeah, lets disregard the possibility that some of them actually liked it. That's obviously impossible. Everybody that left positive feedback was obviously unhappy with the service and that's why they are all party to the class action suit. Oh wait. They aren't suing. Oh nevermind that I'm sure trump just brainwashed them or something. >Keep making excuses lol You're not interested in evaluating trump's positions, likely because you either don't understand them or can't respond to them directly. Keep making that abundantly clear, it really makes the case that supporters for clinton and sanders are informed and rational voters. >so it was rigged then and honest now? LOL FLIP FLOP He says whatever he thinks will win him sympathy. > Ummmmm no. Reporters asked where the donations were he made a big show about collecting for the veterans he supposedly loves and it turned out he only sent the check the DAY he held the press conference but acted like he had done it months ago LOL Sure if you don't mind being called scum LOL Since I'm obviously replying to a drooling child I'm going to skip the explanation of past and present tense and just say I hope your poor teachers can eventually make a breakthrough with you someday. Stay in school.", '>>{ademnus} : >Yeah, lets disregard the possibility that some of them actually liked it. yeah, some might have liked being played like a fiddle for their money. >"This one class, how to profit from foreclosures, will get you started on the clearest, sure-fire, money-making opportunity available in a long, long time." The employees were trained to spot the fattest pigeons >The "playbooks" also advised sales staff on how to speak to reporters, how to dress and run Trump University events, as well as how to identify students with the most liquid assets. >And once buyers have been identified and have filled out the forms, "the team should go through each profile and determine who has the most and least liquid assets," and then rank them in order. >After that came the one-on-one sales pitches. "You must be very aggressive during these conversations in order to push them out of their comfort zone," the note to employees reads. "If they complain about the price, remind them that Trump is the BEST!! This is the last real estate investment they will ever need to make!!" He\'s identified you as a pigeon too.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{5411111} : World Net Daily, the most trusted name in news.', '>>{toekknow} : Is every Trump supporting rebuttal essentially, *"No, you!"*???', '>>{zan5ki} : Yup, the same way every Clinton rebuttal is "but, just look at him!".', '>>{RuneStoneCowboy} : Well known for its anti-Global Warming contest and valuable disinformation campaigns to fix elections. Good catch. Another day. Another victory for 541.', '>>{RuneStoneCowboy} : Yes. Especially between April and October during the presidential election year. Look who the author is....', ">>{WienerNuggetLog} : Nominate Bernie, won't be an issue. Hillary has more skeletons than a grave yard. Trump can't find a flaw with Bernie", ">>{oldschoolcool} : When they can't argue against the arguments, they ad hominem the fuck out of news sources not in her corner.", ">>{EuphoriaRush} : It's why he didn't do the debate. Doesn't have enough opposition research of substantial power to create coherent attacks. It would of been a mess.", '>>{strikes_again_haha} : Stones and glass houses and all that. Though the outrage over the issue shouldnt be whos favorite enemy is guilty but that the scam is so normalized both sides are doing it.', '>>{SoTiredOfWinning} : [Hillary University: Bill Clinton Bagged $16.46 Million from For-Profit College as State Dept. Funneled $55 Million Back](http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/02/hillary-university-bill-clinton-bagged-16-46-million-from-for-profit-college-as-state-dept-funneled-55-million-back/)', ">>{invertedwut} : >It's why he didn't do the debate. He didn't accept the debate offer because nobody wanted to both put up the money and host an actual debate.", ">>{kricke} : You must be new to this election. You don't win by going on the defensive.", '>>{invertedwut} : > "but you can\'t *prove* that I knew it was against the law"', '>>{PolarVolcano} : ??? Someone put up double the amount Trump requested in return for hosting the debate. Trump chickened out, plain and simple.', ">>{invertedwut} : There were three offers. * a no-name tech company that didn't want to host a debate. they even said it wasn't going to be a debate and instead wanted it to be a dog and pony show where the candidates' messages would be at the whim of the company's agenda. - they offered 10 million. * Somebody from the boxing world wanted to make the event pay-per-view. - he offered 10 million * a few networks agreed to host the debate, and donate advertising proceeds to charity, but would not guarantee the requisite ten million if the advertising money didn't cover it. And then bernie never offered to pay any of it. Plain and simple.", '>>{ademnus} : >"I\'m not a racist I just hate Mexicans"', '>>{McKnotz} : Can the ither candidates stop bickering, there are real people hurting here', ">>{Ritz527} : No it's not. Trump U is a literally fraudulent organization. Walden is, despite being a for profit institution, accredited and had low student loan default rates (suggesting students tend to end up with jobs afterwards). This is a right wing hit piece by a right wing douchebag published on a right wing website.", '>>{invertedwut} : >"I can\'t put together a real argument against border enforcement or deportation of illegals but maybe just calling everyone racist will change their minds"', '>>{ademnus} : >When challenged to explain why he believed the judge was biased, Trump said, “He’s a Mexican.”', '>>{ademnus} : They did valuation reports after they left, and we had thousands and thousands of valuations reports, everyone saying it was great, they loved it, they loved it -I don\'t know if you\'ve ever heard this, but we had thousands of them. [Students say they were coerced to give Trump University positive reviews](http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/272663-students-say-they-were-forced-to-give-trump-university-positive-reviews) "The RNC has treated me very fairly" [Our Republican system is absolutely rigged! It\'s a phony deal!](http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/elections/100000004323931/trump-says-system-is-rigged.html) "When I\'m wrong, I can take criticism better than anyone." [Trump throws tantrum after reporters do their job](http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/01/opinions/donald-trump-tantrum-media-role-louis/) This interview is a fountain of hypocrisy, fli-flops and outright lies.', ">>{invertedwut} : >Students say they were coerced to give Trump University positive reviews I can't possibly imagine why a plaintiff would want to recant his positive feedback for the service he's so unhappy with that he wants to sue. >Our Republican system is absolutely rigged! It's a phony deal! He was asked in the present tense in my link and your link was filmed right after the colorado primary. >Trump throws tantrum after reporters do their job More like reporter-activists getting butthurt and trying to take credit for someone else's philanthropy. Keep trying to push the narrative that the guy willing to get roasted on comedy central is thin skinned. Trump is said to be the most accessible candidate to reporters that they've ever worked with and clinton has gone 6 months without a press conference, yet trump is the thin skinned one for calling a guy that accused him of embezzlement a sleaze. Your post is full of misinformed bullshit.", ">>{ademnus} : >I can't possibly imagine why a plaintiff would want to recant his positive feedback for the service he's so unhappy with that he wants to sue Or all those who are unhappy and didn't sue but were coerced into saying they liked it. Keep making excuses lol >He was asked in the present tense in my link and your link was filmed right after the colorado primary. so it was rigged then and honest now? LOL FLIP FLOP He says whatever he thinks will win him sympathy. >More like reporter-activists getting butthurt and trying to take credit for someone else's philanthropy. Ummmmm no. Reporters asked where the donations were he made a big show about collecting for the veterans he supposedly loves and it turned out he only sent the check the DAY he held the press conference but acted like he had done it months ago LOL >Trump is said to be the most accessible candidate to reporters Sure if you don't mind being called scum LOL", ">>{invertedwut} : >Or all those who are unhappy and didn't sue but were coerced into saying they liked it. Yeah, lets disregard the possibility that some of them actually liked it. That's obviously impossible. Everybody that left positive feedback was obviously unhappy with the service and that's why they are all party to the class action suit. Oh wait. They aren't suing. Oh nevermind that I'm sure trump just brainwashed them or something. >Keep making excuses lol You're not interested in evaluating trump's positions, likely because you either don't understand them or can't respond to them directly. Keep making that abundantly clear, it really makes the case that supporters for clinton and sanders are informed and rational voters. >so it was rigged then and honest now? LOL FLIP FLOP He says whatever he thinks will win him sympathy. > Ummmmm no. Reporters asked where the donations were he made a big show about collecting for the veterans he supposedly loves and it turned out he only sent the check the DAY he held the press conference but acted like he had done it months ago LOL Sure if you don't mind being called scum LOL Since I'm obviously replying to a drooling child I'm going to skip the explanation of past and present tense and just say I hope your poor teachers can eventually make a breakthrough with you someday. Stay in school.", '>>{ademnus} : >Yeah, lets disregard the possibility that some of them actually liked it. yeah, some might have liked being played like a fiddle for their money. >"This one class, how to profit from foreclosures, will get you started on the clearest, sure-fire, money-making opportunity available in a long, long time." The employees were trained to spot the fattest pigeons >The "playbooks" also advised sales staff on how to speak to reporters, how to dress and run Trump University events, as well as how to identify students with the most liquid assets. >And once buyers have been identified and have filled out the forms, "the team should go through each profile and determine who has the most and least liquid assets," and then rank them in order. >After that came the one-on-one sales pitches. "You must be very aggressive during these conversations in order to push them out of their comfort zone," the note to employees reads. "If they complain about the price, remind them that Trump is the BEST!! This is the last real estate investment they will ever need to make!!" He\'s identified you as a pigeon too.'], [">>{RosesAreBad} : Humiliating Revelation: Trump Aides Spoon-Fed Him Bulls*t So He'd Stay Calm", ">>{kescusay} : I don't doubt it, but couldn't you have used a more reputable source?", ">>{Cypher_Blue} : > couldn't you have used a more reputable source? Came here to say this. I didn't even click on the link... EDIT: [Here](http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/staffers-plant-alternative-facts-to-stop-trump-from-tweeting.html) it is in New York Mag.", '>>{altnumber10} : >Put another way, if staffers\xa0want Trump\xa0to\xa0focus on important matters and function like\xa0an adult instead of a wounded child, they\xa0must provide\xa0the most special snowflake in America with a “safe space.” Lol', ">>{Satsuma_President} : I never click on the links! /jk But here I definitely didn't. Thanks for the MYMag link.", '>>{GibsonLP86} : [This](http://img.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/whos-a-big-boy-now-720x721.jpg) seems more appropriate every passing day.', ">>{Loffler} : Here's the original report from Politico. The original submission didn't really get any traction here for some reason: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-twitter-staffer-235263", ">>{kevie3drinks} : I use similar tactics to make sure my 12 week old puppy doesn't piss in the house.", '>>{ScienceisMagic} : Humiliating? I believe the correct word is "frightening"', '>>{Gscarveguy} : They should try spoon feeding him some Valium to take the edge off the crank he does daily!', ">>{Nomandate} : that's the standard method for dealing with a malignant narcissist you can't separate from. Containment.", '>>{kousi} : [This too](http://i.imgur.com/GjQPWFV.png "No u")', '>>{partanimal} : Right, because in /r/politics we totally have a standard of only posting the original source and not posting the derivative articles. Come on.', '>>{egs1928} : What. A. Fucking. Pussy. Trumps supporters must be so proud of their pissboy.']]

classify and reply

['>>{Dario_Pfeil} : Nationwide Protests Continue as Obama and Trump Strike Conciliatory Tone', '>>{ram-ok} : Have they not received any of the affected units so that they can examine them?', ">>{MacbookGaming} : That really only allows them to learn so much, they need to be able to replicate and, preferably, initiate the issue themselves to pinpoint exactly what's causing it.", '>>{Themostunderdisturb} : Weird how the people who claim to love democracy and 2 weeks ago were saying you MUST accept the outcome of the election are now in the streets rioting. Pretty depressing...', ">>{tloznerdo} : Can't they just plug in like 1000 phones in a warehouse somewhere, playing the most CPU-intensive app they can find, and wait for one of them to blow up? Seems pretty straighforward", '>>{rtechie1} : All signs point to this being the result of a board issue. I would be looking at traces and capacitors. My guess is damage to traces or caps due to external pressure is the root cause.', '>>{Highfibercarpet} : They need to put them in their back pockets and then sit on them.', '>>{pnutbuttered} : Why on earth would anyone put their phone in their back pocket?', ">>{Kasuge} : I actually feel bad for someone of them. they get a the brunt of the peoples hate even though I know more than likely a large part of them don't like Trump.", '>>{cannibaloxfords} : There is such a thing as corporate espionage/sabotage and there are many avenues in which the engineers may never consider, such as some malware programmed into the phone that triggers overheating in the electronic elements but only once the phone has made its way to a new user, as well as being selective and random in its victims', ">>{rizlah} : don't know why you're getting downvoted so heavily, it's quite a straightforward idea. however, if replicating the problem was this easy, then we'd see so much more exploded Notes out in the wild. remember that so far there were only tens, max hundreds of incidents out of about 3 million devices. that's about 0.01 %. also, these incidents come from far more varied scenarios, none of which was probably as simple as what you're suggesting (which definitely WAS tested before the phone even entered the market).", '>>{SATexas1} : Hillary brought the Arab spring home with her. This is how she do.', '>>{Orange_Republic} : Yeah, how dare people exercise their first amendment right to peacefully assemble!', ">>{D-Evolve} : I would imagine it's hard to replicate 100% any circumstance surrounding an issue like this. It might be something in hardware, software or even a combination of things including power supply at the socket. They may never uncover the exact cause, but at least they've acted and ended production.", ">>{Orc_} : Hi sir I'm from Samsung we looking for bright minds who have this figured it out, how does $100,000 a year sound?", '>>{cam94509} : Wow, you mean when the majorities is overruled by an arcane outdated system, people (peacefully, don\'t make up riots where they don\'t exist) stand up for their human right to representation. "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal", seems to me that if some people\'s votes count more than others, some people are being treated decidedly more equal than others. Given that\'s given as part of the justification for the American Revolution, I\'d say some peaceful protests when the same principles are violated are pretty reasonable.', ">>{wowseriffic} : Doesn't even need to be a back pocket, the phone is massive so I'm assuming tight pants could cause some bending akin to the iPhone 6.", ">>{KEVLAR60442} : Samsung actually has a machine to replicate just that. They put their note 4 in the back pocket of a 200lb butt bot and sat it down again and again to show off the fact that it doesn't bend, unlike the iPhone 6 plus.", '>>{iLikevaginas-} : There is nothing indicating that heat or intensive CPU usage is causing this. In fact, quite a few have spontaneously combusted while just sitting in idle on a desk. Not charging. I was even watching a video, where a guy was plugging a usb device that was designed to destroy electronics into the S7 and the s7 shrugged it off like it was nothing.', ">>{hhlim18} : I had a battery vendors who explain to me about why you some laptop batteries or charger is cheap. your laptop has safety feature to cut off power if it over heat, batteries and chargers have it too. to cut cost some cheap batteries and charges don't have it. what if the problem is not with the phone itself but a combination of unsafe charges and phone?", '>>{ocelotofdeadbodies} : totally agree that the percentage of exploded notes was minuscule, but does anyone else find it odd that such a high percentage of the explosions happened on planes? is there some correlation between note owners and spending excessive amounts of time flying? also @tioznerdo, they could do that, but that doesn\'t explain the problem. imagine if they had a few explode in your experiment. what\'s the conclusion? "using it" causes it to explode? how about the 2.99999 million Notes that didn\'t explode? not to mention all of the other models that don\'t explode. they have to be more systematic.', '>>{cam94509} : >"democratic" >candidate elected by less than the candidate who lost to him lol.', ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : You can easily argue that states with a lower population also deserve representation. Is it really fair, if a handful of states completely dictate who becomes the potus? Imagine if California, Texas, Florida, and NY were all decidedly blue or red. Should 4 states nearly completely dictate the outcome of the US presidential elections? Why would the POTUS candidates give two shits about anyone, except those populations in high density areas?! That doesn't sound like equal representation to me... You might say, well that wouldn't happen right now. Okay, sure, but what about 20 years from now?", '>>{Johnboyofsj} : I thought the only way the batteries could catch fire was if they were charging too quickly', '>>{cam94509} : Two points: 1) That\'s not exactly "democracy." 2) They ARE represented in a popular vote system. Each person is represented equally. Given this, it seems pretty silly to assert that they need bonus representation; it\'s definitely treating some as decidedly more equal than others.', ">>{Com3atmebrah} : Not sure why you got down voted. You pointed out a possible reason. However likely or not it's Still a possibility.", ">>{cannibaloxfords} : I was actually told this possibility by my Grandfather who works for DARPA and the see it all. Of course the public narrative, most people wouldn't believe most of things that go on behind the scenes even if it were shown to them", ">>{Orange_Republic} : > You can easily argue that states with a lower population also deserve representation. They do. All votes should be weighted equally. >Is it really fair, if a handful of states completely dictate who becomes the potus? It's not, and that's why we're trying to change it. Why should MI or OH be considered more important than California, the state with the most people? Wyoming has 3-5 times the voter power as California (depending on if you go by population or votes cast). That seems unreasonable to me. Edit: I'm having to type around my cat, who is laying in front of my keyboard.", ">>{Com3atmebrah} : If a competitor could try and cost Samsung billions of dollars in revenue why wouldn't they? Corporations don't usually play nice.", ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : On paper this is a democratic republic, but it's actually an oligarchy. No, they wouldn't! People in rural areas would effectively get no representation.", ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : What is with Californians... Always thinking you are hot shit! You got 55 electoral votes, nearly double of any other state, aside from Texas. Just because your state is decidedly blue doesn't mean your votes didn't count! If you ask me, half of you wasted your vote. You should have voted for Jill Stein. Completely disregarding people in rural areas seems unreasonable to me.", ">>{infinit_e} : I don't like the feeling of a large phone in my front pocket, so it goes in my back pocket. I never ever sit down without taking it out though.", '>>{JimWebbolution} : Because we can be complete morons sometimes. For example, California voted for Clinton in the primaries', '>>{ErzaKnightwalk} : lol that is a great point... Fucking twats basically gave Trump the presidency, and now they are complaining!', '>>{ErzaKnightwalk} : If Ca had went decidedly with Bernie, then it would have basically tied things up, iirc. Regardless, you still supported the evil witch over Bernie!', '>>{Orange_Republic} : Twice. They did it in 2008, also. I know because I\'m from CA, and we were all in my dad\'s car driving to someplace for dinner and my dad said "Alright, which one of you wrecked it for the rest of us and voted for Clinton?" Turns out, we\'d all voted for Obama. But still, I think it\'s more fair to weigh all votes equally. Because I\'ve only over lived in CA and WA during election season, my national votes have never actually mattered. (I lived in DC for 18 months but never during an election; moved there the week of the 2008 election, actually, voted in CA before we left.) Edit: Also, the CA primary wasn\'t until June. Hillary was pretty much already in place by then.', ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : Peaceful protests usually don't involve attack people and burning property, but you liberals are known for redefining words to suit your purpose. We have an electoral college system, it is the legal way we have chosen to elect our presidents. It's funny you guys never seem to have a problem with it when you win elections. I bet if clinton had won there would be no talk about needing to change it, but since she lost (in a landslide) you want the election results thrown out and the whole system changed. Stop being a sore loser and accept the results.", ">>{Orange_Republic} : You need to look at electoral vote compared to population. CA has 38.8 million people, with 55 electoral votes. That's 705,455 people represented per electoral vote. Wyoming has 584,153 people in it, and 3 electoral votes. That's a mere 194,718 people represented by each electoral vote. Three times as many people are represented by each electoral vote in CA as in WY. And then using actual votes, less than 56,000 people voted in WY for their 3 electoral votes, but 5,471,662 Californians voted on 55. 56,000/3=19,000. Each electoral vote in WY represents only 19,000 people. But 5,471,662/55=99,485. Each electoral vote in CA represents nearly 100 thousand people. Please explain to me why Wyoming's votes should be weighed three to fives times as heavily as California's.", ">>{cam94509} : > It's funny you guys never seem to have a problem with it when you win elections. Quick, name an election the democratic party has ever won via the electoral college without the popular vote. Don't worry, I'll wait! (I think, btw, there is a grand total of zero cases) >Peaceful protests usually don't involve attack people and burning property, but you liberals are known for redefining words to suit your purpose. Got any evidence that this happened that the protest? Burning one's OWN property, that is an effigy, btw, is a peaceful protest. Also, destroying private property isn't violent, but that's neither here nor there. >Stop being a sore loser and accept the results. Why? The election was stolen by an arcane system for the second time in my lifetime!", ">>{Orange_Republic} : No, they'd have equal representation instead of the excessive representation that they currently enjoy.", ">>{palxma} : The election was rigged, we know because the next president said so. And we can look at how he handled previous election loses like in 2012: http://bgr.com/2016/11/09/trump-twitter-obama-election/ >We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. - >This election is a total sham and a travesty. We are not a democracy! Your new president gets the same treatment he gave.", ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : So, why would a presidential candidate ever bother to go into a rural area, never mind consider them in policy positions? It wouldn't be worth their time. It would be far more effective to just pander to the people in metropolitans.", ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : So, wyoming should basically get a completely inconsequential say in who the president of the US is?! That doesn't sound like representation to me. California is worth what? 70 Wyomings in population!? In fact, Ca has a higher population than the bottom 20 US states combined!", ">>{joelrrj} : Some democracy that elects a egomaniac against the people's will. But, these people deserve and have the right to feel angry or afraid. They should use their democratic freedom to protest.", ">>{joelrrj} : Love this. Supporters eat up his rigged election crap and then he wins and it's okay because its their side.", '>>{Themostunderdisturb} : Look at the electoral map that shows counties. 80% of the country is red. Maybe your problem is you live in one of the blue bubbles and have no real contact with americans who think differently than you. You lost.....', ">>{Treci_the_Dragon} : People are allowed to protest (if it is non violent) and they especially have a reason now. This is the second republican president in a row to win the election but not the popular vote. And people saying that if we go popular we just give all the voting power to cities is rather narrow minded. People in New York, California, Texas, Georgia, etc. don't vote because they think that their vote doesn't count because they are voting for their state electorate to vote for president, not for president. Not to mention we have artificial swing states, because those are the states that have realistically equal chance to go either way. Now the reason Clinton lost has many facet to it. From Clinton herself (being an idiot with emails), 24 hour news still acting like Trump was a joke in the general election (yes I am aware of the primary connection with the Clinton camp, but the news continued it into the general), the huge amount of voter suppression (about 800 voting locations closed from last election, bs ID rules), the FBI (with Comey's surprise and the new knowledge of trump land in the FBI), polling being incorrect (even though the national one was technically correct seeing as Clinton did win the most amount of votes), the Bernie or Bust people that refused to vote for Clinton (even though they were told throughout the course of the general that this would happen), and more will probably be revealed over time. Edit: Facet not fascist", ">>{joelrrj} : First, you're right, ELECTORAL MAP. As in the states won, not the people. The majority vote obviously isn't included. But if you actually painted the map with how the people voted you'd see a purple country. Because those states you won is not 100% red. It includes half if not more than half of democrats or third parties. Mind you that's only the people who were eligible to vote or voted.", '>>{Dario_Pfeil} : Good points overall, btw its facet, not fascist', '>>{Isis_the_Goddess} : Yikes. That was an apt typo/slip.', ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : It would also turn those blue areas purple too. But that's not how our system works. We are not one huge country, we are a union of states. That's why Montana and California have the same number of senators. Actually I think the electoral college proved why it's still need this election. Clinton ignored states in the north east she thought were safe and trump did not and went there. That's was the point of the electoral college, to force candidates to pay attention to the whole country and not just the huge population centers.", ">>{Echost} : It's really frustrating being in a blue/red state and knowing your vote is only being counted with those in your state, rather than your vote being counted with the whole country. I'd like my vote to stand with all those who voted for my candidate in the entire country.", ">>{MilksteakBoiledHard} : The fact of the matter is that Trump got the vote out where he needed to. He had a higher percentage of African American and Hispanic voters than Romney while Hillary drew no where near the voters that Obama had. I'd be willing to bet the majority of the people protesting didn't even vote. No vote, no voice.", ">>{black_krim} : That's utter nonsense. Most of the signs are homemade. Where do you get these crap ideas?", '>>{black_krim} : Did you say the same thing about the Tea Party 8 years ago?', '>>{joelrrj} : The problems of the country are unanimous but not the values or methods of certain groups. The whole of the country want change that is certain, but not like this.', ">>{Orange_Republic} : And that's why we have the Senate. Every state in the Senate gets two reps.", ">>{Orange_Republic} : We have the House, and we have the Senate. In the House, representatives are based on population. In the Senate, each state gets two. It's that way for a reason. The Electoral College needs to go away because twice in the last 16 years it failed to elect the most popular candidate. Every vote should count equally.", '>>{SailingBacterium} : And you would know how I voted... how?', ">>{Orange_Republic} : Why should a presidential candidate spend literally weeks in OH, WI, MI, and FL and practically ignore the big cities? Because that's what they do now.", '>>{ErzaKnightwalk} : You, as in Ca, not you as a person.', ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : Obama is the only presidential candidate I have ever seen come to my area. They hardly ignore the big cities... That's ludicrous! They heavily focus on the large cities, because that's where the voters are."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Dario_Pfeil} : Nationwide Protests Continue as Obama and Trump Strike Conciliatory Tone', '>>{Themostunderdisturb} : Weird how the people who claim to love democracy and 2 weeks ago were saying you MUST accept the outcome of the election are now in the streets rioting. Pretty depressing...', ">>{Kasuge} : I actually feel bad for someone of them. they get a the brunt of the peoples hate even though I know more than likely a large part of them don't like Trump.", '>>{SATexas1} : Hillary brought the Arab spring home with her. This is how she do.', '>>{Orange_Republic} : Yeah, how dare people exercise their first amendment right to peacefully assemble!', '>>{cam94509} : Wow, you mean when the majorities is overruled by an arcane outdated system, people (peacefully, don\'t make up riots where they don\'t exist) stand up for their human right to representation. "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal", seems to me that if some people\'s votes count more than others, some people are being treated decidedly more equal than others. Given that\'s given as part of the justification for the American Revolution, I\'d say some peaceful protests when the same principles are violated are pretty reasonable.', '>>{cam94509} : >"democratic" >candidate elected by less than the candidate who lost to him lol.', ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : You can easily argue that states with a lower population also deserve representation. Is it really fair, if a handful of states completely dictate who becomes the potus? Imagine if California, Texas, Florida, and NY were all decidedly blue or red. Should 4 states nearly completely dictate the outcome of the US presidential elections? Why would the POTUS candidates give two shits about anyone, except those populations in high density areas?! That doesn't sound like equal representation to me... You might say, well that wouldn't happen right now. Okay, sure, but what about 20 years from now?", '>>{cam94509} : Two points: 1) That\'s not exactly "democracy." 2) They ARE represented in a popular vote system. Each person is represented equally. Given this, it seems pretty silly to assert that they need bonus representation; it\'s definitely treating some as decidedly more equal than others.', ">>{Orange_Republic} : > You can easily argue that states with a lower population also deserve representation. They do. All votes should be weighted equally. >Is it really fair, if a handful of states completely dictate who becomes the potus? It's not, and that's why we're trying to change it. Why should MI or OH be considered more important than California, the state with the most people? Wyoming has 3-5 times the voter power as California (depending on if you go by population or votes cast). That seems unreasonable to me. Edit: I'm having to type around my cat, who is laying in front of my keyboard.", ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : On paper this is a democratic republic, but it's actually an oligarchy. No, they wouldn't! People in rural areas would effectively get no representation.", ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : What is with Californians... Always thinking you are hot shit! You got 55 electoral votes, nearly double of any other state, aside from Texas. Just because your state is decidedly blue doesn't mean your votes didn't count! If you ask me, half of you wasted your vote. You should have voted for Jill Stein. Completely disregarding people in rural areas seems unreasonable to me.", '>>{JimWebbolution} : Because we can be complete morons sometimes. For example, California voted for Clinton in the primaries', '>>{ErzaKnightwalk} : lol that is a great point... Fucking twats basically gave Trump the presidency, and now they are complaining!', '>>{ErzaKnightwalk} : If Ca had went decidedly with Bernie, then it would have basically tied things up, iirc. Regardless, you still supported the evil witch over Bernie!', '>>{Orange_Republic} : Twice. They did it in 2008, also. I know because I\'m from CA, and we were all in my dad\'s car driving to someplace for dinner and my dad said "Alright, which one of you wrecked it for the rest of us and voted for Clinton?" Turns out, we\'d all voted for Obama. But still, I think it\'s more fair to weigh all votes equally. Because I\'ve only over lived in CA and WA during election season, my national votes have never actually mattered. (I lived in DC for 18 months but never during an election; moved there the week of the 2008 election, actually, voted in CA before we left.) Edit: Also, the CA primary wasn\'t until June. Hillary was pretty much already in place by then.', ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : Peaceful protests usually don't involve attack people and burning property, but you liberals are known for redefining words to suit your purpose. We have an electoral college system, it is the legal way we have chosen to elect our presidents. It's funny you guys never seem to have a problem with it when you win elections. I bet if clinton had won there would be no talk about needing to change it, but since she lost (in a landslide) you want the election results thrown out and the whole system changed. Stop being a sore loser and accept the results.", ">>{Orange_Republic} : You need to look at electoral vote compared to population. CA has 38.8 million people, with 55 electoral votes. That's 705,455 people represented per electoral vote. Wyoming has 584,153 people in it, and 3 electoral votes. That's a mere 194,718 people represented by each electoral vote. Three times as many people are represented by each electoral vote in CA as in WY. And then using actual votes, less than 56,000 people voted in WY for their 3 electoral votes, but 5,471,662 Californians voted on 55. 56,000/3=19,000. Each electoral vote in WY represents only 19,000 people. But 5,471,662/55=99,485. Each electoral vote in CA represents nearly 100 thousand people. Please explain to me why Wyoming's votes should be weighed three to fives times as heavily as California's.", ">>{cam94509} : > It's funny you guys never seem to have a problem with it when you win elections. Quick, name an election the democratic party has ever won via the electoral college without the popular vote. Don't worry, I'll wait! (I think, btw, there is a grand total of zero cases) >Peaceful protests usually don't involve attack people and burning property, but you liberals are known for redefining words to suit your purpose. Got any evidence that this happened that the protest? Burning one's OWN property, that is an effigy, btw, is a peaceful protest. Also, destroying private property isn't violent, but that's neither here nor there. >Stop being a sore loser and accept the results. Why? The election was stolen by an arcane system for the second time in my lifetime!", ">>{Orange_Republic} : No, they'd have equal representation instead of the excessive representation that they currently enjoy.", ">>{palxma} : The election was rigged, we know because the next president said so. And we can look at how he handled previous election loses like in 2012: http://bgr.com/2016/11/09/trump-twitter-obama-election/ >We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. - >This election is a total sham and a travesty. We are not a democracy! Your new president gets the same treatment he gave.", ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : So, why would a presidential candidate ever bother to go into a rural area, never mind consider them in policy positions? It wouldn't be worth their time. It would be far more effective to just pander to the people in metropolitans.", ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : So, wyoming should basically get a completely inconsequential say in who the president of the US is?! That doesn't sound like representation to me. California is worth what? 70 Wyomings in population!? In fact, Ca has a higher population than the bottom 20 US states combined!", ">>{joelrrj} : Some democracy that elects a egomaniac against the people's will. But, these people deserve and have the right to feel angry or afraid. They should use their democratic freedom to protest.", ">>{joelrrj} : Love this. Supporters eat up his rigged election crap and then he wins and it's okay because its their side.", '>>{Themostunderdisturb} : Look at the electoral map that shows counties. 80% of the country is red. Maybe your problem is you live in one of the blue bubbles and have no real contact with americans who think differently than you. You lost.....', ">>{Treci_the_Dragon} : People are allowed to protest (if it is non violent) and they especially have a reason now. This is the second republican president in a row to win the election but not the popular vote. And people saying that if we go popular we just give all the voting power to cities is rather narrow minded. People in New York, California, Texas, Georgia, etc. don't vote because they think that their vote doesn't count because they are voting for their state electorate to vote for president, not for president. Not to mention we have artificial swing states, because those are the states that have realistically equal chance to go either way. Now the reason Clinton lost has many facet to it. From Clinton herself (being an idiot with emails), 24 hour news still acting like Trump was a joke in the general election (yes I am aware of the primary connection with the Clinton camp, but the news continued it into the general), the huge amount of voter suppression (about 800 voting locations closed from last election, bs ID rules), the FBI (with Comey's surprise and the new knowledge of trump land in the FBI), polling being incorrect (even though the national one was technically correct seeing as Clinton did win the most amount of votes), the Bernie or Bust people that refused to vote for Clinton (even though they were told throughout the course of the general that this would happen), and more will probably be revealed over time. Edit: Facet not fascist", ">>{joelrrj} : First, you're right, ELECTORAL MAP. As in the states won, not the people. The majority vote obviously isn't included. But if you actually painted the map with how the people voted you'd see a purple country. Because those states you won is not 100% red. It includes half if not more than half of democrats or third parties. Mind you that's only the people who were eligible to vote or voted.", '>>{Dario_Pfeil} : Good points overall, btw its facet, not fascist', '>>{Isis_the_Goddess} : Yikes. That was an apt typo/slip.', ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : It would also turn those blue areas purple too. But that's not how our system works. We are not one huge country, we are a union of states. That's why Montana and California have the same number of senators. Actually I think the electoral college proved why it's still need this election. Clinton ignored states in the north east she thought were safe and trump did not and went there. That's was the point of the electoral college, to force candidates to pay attention to the whole country and not just the huge population centers.", ">>{Echost} : It's really frustrating being in a blue/red state and knowing your vote is only being counted with those in your state, rather than your vote being counted with the whole country. I'd like my vote to stand with all those who voted for my candidate in the entire country.", ">>{MilksteakBoiledHard} : The fact of the matter is that Trump got the vote out where he needed to. He had a higher percentage of African American and Hispanic voters than Romney while Hillary drew no where near the voters that Obama had. I'd be willing to bet the majority of the people protesting didn't even vote. No vote, no voice.", ">>{black_krim} : That's utter nonsense. Most of the signs are homemade. Where do you get these crap ideas?", '>>{black_krim} : Did you say the same thing about the Tea Party 8 years ago?', '>>{joelrrj} : The problems of the country are unanimous but not the values or methods of certain groups. The whole of the country want change that is certain, but not like this.', ">>{Orange_Republic} : And that's why we have the Senate. Every state in the Senate gets two reps.", ">>{Orange_Republic} : We have the House, and we have the Senate. In the House, representatives are based on population. In the Senate, each state gets two. It's that way for a reason. The Electoral College needs to go away because twice in the last 16 years it failed to elect the most popular candidate. Every vote should count equally.", '>>{SailingBacterium} : And you would know how I voted... how?', ">>{Orange_Republic} : Why should a presidential candidate spend literally weeks in OH, WI, MI, and FL and practically ignore the big cities? Because that's what they do now.", '>>{ErzaKnightwalk} : You, as in Ca, not you as a person.', ">>{ErzaKnightwalk} : Obama is the only presidential candidate I have ever seen come to my area. They hardly ignore the big cities... That's ludicrous! They heavily focus on the large cities, because that's where the voters are."], ['>>{ram-ok} : Have they not received any of the affected units so that they can examine them?', ">>{MacbookGaming} : That really only allows them to learn so much, they need to be able to replicate and, preferably, initiate the issue themselves to pinpoint exactly what's causing it.", ">>{tloznerdo} : Can't they just plug in like 1000 phones in a warehouse somewhere, playing the most CPU-intensive app they can find, and wait for one of them to blow up? Seems pretty straighforward", '>>{rtechie1} : All signs point to this being the result of a board issue. I would be looking at traces and capacitors. My guess is damage to traces or caps due to external pressure is the root cause.', '>>{Highfibercarpet} : They need to put them in their back pockets and then sit on them.', '>>{pnutbuttered} : Why on earth would anyone put their phone in their back pocket?', '>>{cannibaloxfords} : There is such a thing as corporate espionage/sabotage and there are many avenues in which the engineers may never consider, such as some malware programmed into the phone that triggers overheating in the electronic elements but only once the phone has made its way to a new user, as well as being selective and random in its victims', ">>{rizlah} : don't know why you're getting downvoted so heavily, it's quite a straightforward idea. however, if replicating the problem was this easy, then we'd see so much more exploded Notes out in the wild. remember that so far there were only tens, max hundreds of incidents out of about 3 million devices. that's about 0.01 %. also, these incidents come from far more varied scenarios, none of which was probably as simple as what you're suggesting (which definitely WAS tested before the phone even entered the market).", ">>{D-Evolve} : I would imagine it's hard to replicate 100% any circumstance surrounding an issue like this. It might be something in hardware, software or even a combination of things including power supply at the socket. They may never uncover the exact cause, but at least they've acted and ended production.", ">>{Orc_} : Hi sir I'm from Samsung we looking for bright minds who have this figured it out, how does $100,000 a year sound?", ">>{wowseriffic} : Doesn't even need to be a back pocket, the phone is massive so I'm assuming tight pants could cause some bending akin to the iPhone 6.", ">>{KEVLAR60442} : Samsung actually has a machine to replicate just that. They put their note 4 in the back pocket of a 200lb butt bot and sat it down again and again to show off the fact that it doesn't bend, unlike the iPhone 6 plus.", '>>{iLikevaginas-} : There is nothing indicating that heat or intensive CPU usage is causing this. In fact, quite a few have spontaneously combusted while just sitting in idle on a desk. Not charging. I was even watching a video, where a guy was plugging a usb device that was designed to destroy electronics into the S7 and the s7 shrugged it off like it was nothing.', ">>{hhlim18} : I had a battery vendors who explain to me about why you some laptop batteries or charger is cheap. your laptop has safety feature to cut off power if it over heat, batteries and chargers have it too. to cut cost some cheap batteries and charges don't have it. what if the problem is not with the phone itself but a combination of unsafe charges and phone?", '>>{ocelotofdeadbodies} : totally agree that the percentage of exploded notes was minuscule, but does anyone else find it odd that such a high percentage of the explosions happened on planes? is there some correlation between note owners and spending excessive amounts of time flying? also @tioznerdo, they could do that, but that doesn\'t explain the problem. imagine if they had a few explode in your experiment. what\'s the conclusion? "using it" causes it to explode? how about the 2.99999 million Notes that didn\'t explode? not to mention all of the other models that don\'t explode. they have to be more systematic.', '>>{Johnboyofsj} : I thought the only way the batteries could catch fire was if they were charging too quickly', ">>{Com3atmebrah} : Not sure why you got down voted. You pointed out a possible reason. However likely or not it's Still a possibility.", ">>{cannibaloxfords} : I was actually told this possibility by my Grandfather who works for DARPA and the see it all. Of course the public narrative, most people wouldn't believe most of things that go on behind the scenes even if it were shown to them", ">>{Com3atmebrah} : If a competitor could try and cost Samsung billions of dollars in revenue why wouldn't they? Corporations don't usually play nice.", ">>{infinit_e} : I don't like the feeling of a large phone in my front pocket, so it goes in my back pocket. I never ever sit down without taking it out though."]]

classify and reply

['>>{HBombthrow} : Democrat Senator Jon Tester will vote against Supreme Court nominee Gorsuch', ">>{SAT0725} : California high school student's grade lowered for sitting during Pledge of Allegiance", ">>{HBombthrow} : Sen. Tester's state, Montana, went for Trump by 20 points.", '>>{satosaison} : Well, that is an obvious violation of the First Amendment. It is good to see the superintendent has the kids back.', ">>{Rosalee32} : Jayalalithaa writes a letter to Hillary Clinton, says 'you're a role model for women'", ">>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : What this tells me is that Tester thinks his seat's pretty safe in 2018. He must be really banking on anti-Trump sentiments.", ">>{ScotTheDuck} : Montana has always been kind of special in non-Presidential elections, and even then it voted for Bill Clinton in 1992. Romney won Montana by 15 points the last time Tester was up in 2012, but Tester won by 4 points in that same race. Republican die hard at the presidential level, but willing to send Democrats to both State and Federal positions otherwise. If there's a big anti-Trump wave in 2018 (and if those numbers hold, there really isn't reason to suspect there isn't), I bet Tester is safer than we think he is.", ">>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : Especially with Zinke out of the way. He really was the Sword of Damocles over Tester's campaign, and if (god willing) Quist beats Gianforte we'll have a safer seat.", ">>{dam_3} : They've also had two two-term Dem governors in a row.", '>>{IronTagger} : Someone that bombs women and children should not be considered a "role model for women"', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : Woman cards for American women. Cluster bombs for Yemeni women and children.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : She has her faults, it's true. But Hillary Clinton was an ambitious and hard working woman before she ever met Bill Clinton. Even if you don't like her or her policies, I think it is hard to deny that she has accomplished a lot. 100 years ago women couldn't even vote. 50 years ago it was uncommon for them to have jobs outside of teaching or being a secretary. At that time---she was studying political science and trying to be a lawyer. I think she is inspiring enough to be a role model, at least.", ">>{BlueDogDem62} : Unless you are one of Bill's rape victims or a 12yo girl that was raped into a coma. Then she attacks your character and recalls the situation with laughter. But otherwise she is great for women that worship her.", ">>{really_redundant} : Montana Democrats are very pragmatic. I think they're more tuned in to what their state wants, being a very red state which has sent Democrats to Congress for a long time.", ">>{suitedupforaction} : If her fault is not being able to assess civilian casualties to the tune of hundreds of thousands, when she feels like playing Chess with the Middle East, it's an unpardonable and indefensible one.", ">>{lovely_sombrero} : I don't judge her as a woman, but as a person.", ">>{AnthroPoBoy} : >50 years ago it was uncommon for them to have jobs outside of teaching or being a secretary. OP's article is from India, where a woman became prime minister 50 years ago. To suggest Hillary is some kind of historical paragon for women is, frankly, bullshit.", '>>{dread_lobster} : Why the fuck is Reuters using the Newt Gingrich Pejorative Adjective of Ignorance, "Democrat?" The Party\'s name is Democrat**ic**.', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : Sure, if your idea of a good role model includes 1) marry well, 2) lie and cheat to advance your career no matter what, 3) sell your vote to the highest bidder', ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : Isn't that all participation grades in schools? I didn't like participation grades when I went to high school and college, but schools let it happen. A 100% of that grade is how much the teacher liked you.", '>>{Guysaac2} : In my high school I pledged allegiance to coffee every day. Teachers never noticed so I could continue to suck up to them without actually swearing myself to the flag by God.', '>>{Ambiwlans} : Democrat the word has been around much longer than the US.... unless you think Newt was a bigwig in 18th century france.', ">>{axelrod_squad} : Why, because she has a vagina? That's.truly deep thinking. Hillary is one of the most unpopular nominees in history, has a string of foreign policy failures, and is very likely a criminal. If she had a penis you'd hate her", '>>{KKKafir} : Margaret Thatcher is/was also a role model for women. She stood strong in front of a hostile political opposition and was a power in global politics. She should be held as a champion for women.', ">>{Logical_Hare} : I've never heard of a school officially including mandatory patriotic displays in their grading system, whether a participation grade or otherwise. The courts have ruled on these issues already, after all. Schools merely changing the *way* they force and/or heavily incentivize participation in patriotic displays would be unlikely to fly if a lawsuit were filed.", '>>{x86_64Ubuntu} : Can you imagine how poorly a country would be looked upon if they said "a significant part of the grade for a student in Whereverland is based on participating in patriotic displays".', ">>{RosneftTrump2020} : It's always right wingers who say it like a shout out to Andrew Jackson.", '>>{Albert3232} : I pity woman who think hrc is a role model', '>>{fosian} : Yes, that is true. You can disagree with her politics (a lot of people do), but Thatcher was a hell of person. The original Iron Lady.', ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : Doesn't matter because teachers don't give you answers on why your participation grade is not a 100. It always has been a subjective grade based on the teachers feelings about you.", '>>{gaeuvyen} : If you came up to me and told me that there is a country where a significant portion of someone\'s success in school is based on participating in patriotic displays, I\'d probably ask, "Like, is this in North Korea?"', '>>{sundialinshade} : > her party supporters, are now causing her utter shame by allegedly stopping the relief materials being transported for the affected people and pasting stickers with Jayalalitha’ s photo on the bags full of relief materials. > This has angered people who are now criticising the AIADMK chief for ‘shamelessly’ trying to extract political benefits even from this unprecedented human tragedy. http://www.jantakareporter.com/india/chennai-amma/31496', '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : This is specifically about why she is a role model for women.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Did I say she was a historical paragon? You're trying to make it into something that it isn't. India isn't the U.S. For the U.S., a female president would be a historical occasion.", ">>{glioblastoma} : No all participation is not grades. I have no idea where you got idea from but you can't punish students for not participating in sports, music programs, clubs, etc.", '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : You can punish a student from not participating in class discussions, not being attentive during class... all which are subjective.', ">>{glioblastoma} : >You can punish a student from not participating in class discussions No you can't. >not being attentive during class... all which are subjective. Again you can't punish a student for not being patriotic. We don't live in North Korea.", ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : >You can punish a student from not participating in class discussions No you can't.not being attentive during class... all which are subjective. Yes you can and must not be college educated if you never had class participation grade for assignments, class discussions, and judgements in how a speech was given which are all subjective.", '>>{cupcakesarethedevil} : His term is up in less than 2 years so he best hope this goes well.', '>>{robotjosh} : I use "democrat party" when referring to the bad corporate parts of it. I know its the "democratic party" but its the "democrat party" when they are fucking up or selling us out.', ">>{dread_lobster} : Yes, and those people are properly referred to as Democratic people (politicians, staffers, voters , etc.) Adjective vs noun. [edit: I'm reading your downvote as an acknowledgement of your illiteracy.]", '>>{glioblastoma} : >Yes you can and must not be college educated if you never had class participation grade for assignments, class discussions, and judgements in how a speech was given which are all subjective. Let me get this straight. You accuse me of not being college educated and yet you typed this so called sentence and hit submit.', '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : If you never took a class that had a participation grade for a class discussion then you never went to college. >You accuse me of not being college educated and yet you typed this so called sentence and hit submit You just typed a run on sentence with the accusation of my grammar being bad. Also "you accuse" is not proper English, it is either you\'re acussing me or you accused me. Your English is just as bad.', '>>{dread_lobster} : Democrat, used improperly as an adjective is a Gingrich affectation that he pushed on his party when he was Speaker.', '>>{Lochleon} : No, that\'s one of those "facts" that goes around some places, but it\'s not true. That goes back to the 40s if anything, and *Democrats* themselves have already adopted and neutered its pejorative use.', ">>{mec287} : Or he thinking if he's going out anyway might as well go down swinging.", ">>{glioblastoma} : >If you never took a class that had a participation grade for a class discussion then you never went to college. If you can't type a coherent sentence you never went to collage. If you think it's legal to punish students for not showing patriotic fervor you never went to college.", ">>{mec287} : This is false. The media guide put out by the Democratic party specifically says that's an improper use of the name. It may be a long standing epithet but it hasn't\u200b been divorced from that taint.", '>>{Lochleon} : The democratic party not preferring its use doesn\'t make it \'false\'. The decider is the common vernacular and not the party organization itself. Also, while they may not like "Democrat Party", which was a new twist of Gingrinch, they have no apparent party messaging rules against "democrat" which they freely call themselves.', ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : >If you can't type a coherent sentence you never went to collage. Youre right I never did go to collage, I graduated college. YOU FAILED AT SPELLING COLLEGE!", '>>{Roseking} : That page clearly refers to the term Democrat Party. Not the term Democrat. It even use Democrats to describe members of the party in that article.', '>>{mec287} : No. An organization with a legally defined named doesn\'t get changed by common use.Thats just a nonsense claim. Its just flat out disrespectful. And popular use among Republicans, either out of ignorance or spite, doesn\'t remove the negative connotation. Democrat is fine when used as a noun because that\'s how English works. "X is a Democratic" doesn\'t make any sense. When used as an adjective the we use "Democratic" as a modifier. X is a Democratic Senator. It really isn\'t hard.', ">>{mec287} : Come back when you've learned the difference between a plural noun and an adjective.", ">>{mec287} : It's also written correctly in the first sentence of the Reuters article. In case more people struggle with comprehension. > *Democratic* U.S. Senator Jon Tester said on Sunday . . .", ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : You're the grammar Nazi and you cannot even form a sentence without mistakes.", '>>{glioblastoma} : I suggest you move to north korea where kids are punished for not being patriotic enough.', ">>{Lochleon} : You're confused about what is actually being argued here, and I don't have the patience. Please stop oranging me.", '>>{FlashOfThunder} : That sucks for Jehovah Witness. What happen to freedom of speech!']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Rosalee32} : Jayalalithaa writes a letter to Hillary Clinton, says 'you're a role model for women'", '>>{IronTagger} : Someone that bombs women and children should not be considered a "role model for women"', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : Woman cards for American women. Cluster bombs for Yemeni women and children.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : She has her faults, it's true. But Hillary Clinton was an ambitious and hard working woman before she ever met Bill Clinton. Even if you don't like her or her policies, I think it is hard to deny that she has accomplished a lot. 100 years ago women couldn't even vote. 50 years ago it was uncommon for them to have jobs outside of teaching or being a secretary. At that time---she was studying political science and trying to be a lawyer. I think she is inspiring enough to be a role model, at least.", ">>{BlueDogDem62} : Unless you are one of Bill's rape victims or a 12yo girl that was raped into a coma. Then she attacks your character and recalls the situation with laughter. But otherwise she is great for women that worship her.", ">>{suitedupforaction} : If her fault is not being able to assess civilian casualties to the tune of hundreds of thousands, when she feels like playing Chess with the Middle East, it's an unpardonable and indefensible one.", ">>{lovely_sombrero} : I don't judge her as a woman, but as a person.", ">>{AnthroPoBoy} : >50 years ago it was uncommon for them to have jobs outside of teaching or being a secretary. OP's article is from India, where a woman became prime minister 50 years ago. To suggest Hillary is some kind of historical paragon for women is, frankly, bullshit.", '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : Sure, if your idea of a good role model includes 1) marry well, 2) lie and cheat to advance your career no matter what, 3) sell your vote to the highest bidder', ">>{axelrod_squad} : Why, because she has a vagina? That's.truly deep thinking. Hillary is one of the most unpopular nominees in history, has a string of foreign policy failures, and is very likely a criminal. If she had a penis you'd hate her", '>>{KKKafir} : Margaret Thatcher is/was also a role model for women. She stood strong in front of a hostile political opposition and was a power in global politics. She should be held as a champion for women.', '>>{Albert3232} : I pity woman who think hrc is a role model', '>>{fosian} : Yes, that is true. You can disagree with her politics (a lot of people do), but Thatcher was a hell of person. The original Iron Lady.', '>>{sundialinshade} : > her party supporters, are now causing her utter shame by allegedly stopping the relief materials being transported for the affected people and pasting stickers with Jayalalitha’ s photo on the bags full of relief materials. > This has angered people who are now criticising the AIADMK chief for ‘shamelessly’ trying to extract political benefits even from this unprecedented human tragedy. http://www.jantakareporter.com/india/chennai-amma/31496', '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : This is specifically about why she is a role model for women.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Did I say she was a historical paragon? You're trying to make it into something that it isn't. India isn't the U.S. For the U.S., a female president would be a historical occasion."], ['>>{HBombthrow} : Democrat Senator Jon Tester will vote against Supreme Court nominee Gorsuch', ">>{HBombthrow} : Sen. Tester's state, Montana, went for Trump by 20 points.", ">>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : What this tells me is that Tester thinks his seat's pretty safe in 2018. He must be really banking on anti-Trump sentiments.", ">>{ScotTheDuck} : Montana has always been kind of special in non-Presidential elections, and even then it voted for Bill Clinton in 1992. Romney won Montana by 15 points the last time Tester was up in 2012, but Tester won by 4 points in that same race. Republican die hard at the presidential level, but willing to send Democrats to both State and Federal positions otherwise. If there's a big anti-Trump wave in 2018 (and if those numbers hold, there really isn't reason to suspect there isn't), I bet Tester is safer than we think he is.", ">>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : Especially with Zinke out of the way. He really was the Sword of Damocles over Tester's campaign, and if (god willing) Quist beats Gianforte we'll have a safer seat.", ">>{dam_3} : They've also had two two-term Dem governors in a row.", ">>{really_redundant} : Montana Democrats are very pragmatic. I think they're more tuned in to what their state wants, being a very red state which has sent Democrats to Congress for a long time.", '>>{dread_lobster} : Why the fuck is Reuters using the Newt Gingrich Pejorative Adjective of Ignorance, "Democrat?" The Party\'s name is Democrat**ic**.', '>>{Ambiwlans} : Democrat the word has been around much longer than the US.... unless you think Newt was a bigwig in 18th century france.', ">>{RosneftTrump2020} : It's always right wingers who say it like a shout out to Andrew Jackson.", '>>{cupcakesarethedevil} : His term is up in less than 2 years so he best hope this goes well.', '>>{robotjosh} : I use "democrat party" when referring to the bad corporate parts of it. I know its the "democratic party" but its the "democrat party" when they are fucking up or selling us out.', ">>{dread_lobster} : Yes, and those people are properly referred to as Democratic people (politicians, staffers, voters , etc.) Adjective vs noun. [edit: I'm reading your downvote as an acknowledgement of your illiteracy.]", '>>{dread_lobster} : Democrat, used improperly as an adjective is a Gingrich affectation that he pushed on his party when he was Speaker.', '>>{Lochleon} : No, that\'s one of those "facts" that goes around some places, but it\'s not true. That goes back to the 40s if anything, and *Democrats* themselves have already adopted and neutered its pejorative use.', ">>{mec287} : Or he thinking if he's going out anyway might as well go down swinging.", ">>{mec287} : This is false. The media guide put out by the Democratic party specifically says that's an improper use of the name. It may be a long standing epithet but it hasn't\u200b been divorced from that taint.", '>>{Lochleon} : The democratic party not preferring its use doesn\'t make it \'false\'. The decider is the common vernacular and not the party organization itself. Also, while they may not like "Democrat Party", which was a new twist of Gingrinch, they have no apparent party messaging rules against "democrat" which they freely call themselves.', '>>{Roseking} : That page clearly refers to the term Democrat Party. Not the term Democrat. It even use Democrats to describe members of the party in that article.', '>>{mec287} : No. An organization with a legally defined named doesn\'t get changed by common use.Thats just a nonsense claim. Its just flat out disrespectful. And popular use among Republicans, either out of ignorance or spite, doesn\'t remove the negative connotation. Democrat is fine when used as a noun because that\'s how English works. "X is a Democratic" doesn\'t make any sense. When used as an adjective the we use "Democratic" as a modifier. X is a Democratic Senator. It really isn\'t hard.', ">>{mec287} : Come back when you've learned the difference between a plural noun and an adjective.", ">>{mec287} : It's also written correctly in the first sentence of the Reuters article. In case more people struggle with comprehension. > *Democratic* U.S. Senator Jon Tester said on Sunday . . .", ">>{Lochleon} : You're confused about what is actually being argued here, and I don't have the patience. Please stop oranging me."], [">>{SAT0725} : California high school student's grade lowered for sitting during Pledge of Allegiance", '>>{satosaison} : Well, that is an obvious violation of the First Amendment. It is good to see the superintendent has the kids back.', ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : Isn't that all participation grades in schools? I didn't like participation grades when I went to high school and college, but schools let it happen. A 100% of that grade is how much the teacher liked you.", '>>{Guysaac2} : In my high school I pledged allegiance to coffee every day. Teachers never noticed so I could continue to suck up to them without actually swearing myself to the flag by God.', ">>{Logical_Hare} : I've never heard of a school officially including mandatory patriotic displays in their grading system, whether a participation grade or otherwise. The courts have ruled on these issues already, after all. Schools merely changing the *way* they force and/or heavily incentivize participation in patriotic displays would be unlikely to fly if a lawsuit were filed.", '>>{x86_64Ubuntu} : Can you imagine how poorly a country would be looked upon if they said "a significant part of the grade for a student in Whereverland is based on participating in patriotic displays".', ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : Doesn't matter because teachers don't give you answers on why your participation grade is not a 100. It always has been a subjective grade based on the teachers feelings about you.", '>>{gaeuvyen} : If you came up to me and told me that there is a country where a significant portion of someone\'s success in school is based on participating in patriotic displays, I\'d probably ask, "Like, is this in North Korea?"', ">>{glioblastoma} : No all participation is not grades. I have no idea where you got idea from but you can't punish students for not participating in sports, music programs, clubs, etc.", '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : You can punish a student from not participating in class discussions, not being attentive during class... all which are subjective.', ">>{glioblastoma} : >You can punish a student from not participating in class discussions No you can't. >not being attentive during class... all which are subjective. Again you can't punish a student for not being patriotic. We don't live in North Korea.", ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : >You can punish a student from not participating in class discussions No you can't.not being attentive during class... all which are subjective. Yes you can and must not be college educated if you never had class participation grade for assignments, class discussions, and judgements in how a speech was given which are all subjective.", '>>{glioblastoma} : >Yes you can and must not be college educated if you never had class participation grade for assignments, class discussions, and judgements in how a speech was given which are all subjective. Let me get this straight. You accuse me of not being college educated and yet you typed this so called sentence and hit submit.', '>>{1800Feelsbadman} : If you never took a class that had a participation grade for a class discussion then you never went to college. >You accuse me of not being college educated and yet you typed this so called sentence and hit submit You just typed a run on sentence with the accusation of my grammar being bad. Also "you accuse" is not proper English, it is either you\'re acussing me or you accused me. Your English is just as bad.', ">>{glioblastoma} : >If you never took a class that had a participation grade for a class discussion then you never went to college. If you can't type a coherent sentence you never went to collage. If you think it's legal to punish students for not showing patriotic fervor you never went to college.", ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : >If you can't type a coherent sentence you never went to collage. Youre right I never did go to collage, I graduated college. YOU FAILED AT SPELLING COLLEGE!", ">>{1800Feelsbadman} : You're the grammar Nazi and you cannot even form a sentence without mistakes.", '>>{glioblastoma} : I suggest you move to north korea where kids are punished for not being patriotic enough.', '>>{FlashOfThunder} : That sucks for Jehovah Witness. What happen to freedom of speech!']]

classify and reply

[">>{bubbleawsome} : I've had my 6s since launch day. I don't plan to upgrade this year unless something amazing happens for the 10th anniversary. The first 6s I had got replaced because of the battery recall, and now this ones camera is messed up, but otherwise they've had no problems. Battery life on the one with battery issues was still easily 7 hours with me using it. Now it lasts nearly 12 hours. The phone is still fast and doesn't have any software issues. The 2GB RAM I think really separates it from the 6.", '>>{Scottydbeatbox} : Put a black screen protector on my white iPhone 7+. Turned out pretty well', ">>{Flandersmcj} : 6S+. I've had mine about a year. I quite like it but I plan on going to a 7S+/8+ (whatever comes next).", ">>{ChiefsRoyalsFan} : I got the 6s+ about a month after launch. I love this phone but plan on getting the latest and greatest iPhone later this year whether it's the 7s+ or 8+.", ">>{Scottydbeatbox} : [Here's a link to the product I used](https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01KYNY69I/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1) [And a higher quality photo](http://i.imgur.com/uaAtbzj.jpg). It doesn't cover 100% of the front, so there are these very subtle white lines around the side edges which give it some contrast. Part of me is bothered by it because it's not perfect, but at the same time I genuinely think it looks pretty good.", '>>{madflavr} : Fuck the Democrats. There are not progressive or friends of progressive causes.', ">>{TheArmandoV} : I've had mine since about 2 weeks after launch and I'm very happy with it. The camera is very tempting on the 7+ but I'll probably wait for the 8+ / 8s+ as it's still a very capable phone.", ">>{SpartanSK117} : Had my 6S since April 2016. Had a few issues such as having to replace the battery a few weeks ago and now having to go back again this week to get a new touch ID sensor. But other than that it's been the best phone I've ever had and my first iPhone. I don't see the 7 as a necessary upgrade because its only marginally faster and waterproofing isn't a big deal to me because I don't plan on putting my phone anywhere near it, but I think I'll wait for the so called 8 and see if its a worthy upgrade.", '>>{Jorgesarcos} : Ive had my 6s plus for about a year now, only issue is the aluminum corrosion that somehow got in the back, its tiny and ive never used it without its case, but it is there and i hate it :C', ">>{Funkbass} : The result is cool but I still can't figure out how you took the picture.", ">>{BaldRunnerGuy} : Had mine for a few months and love it. No plans to upgrade. I'll use it til it dies.", ">>{HansChr15} : As soon as the 7 Plus came out, I already decided not to get it. -water resistant -Higher color gambit -no headphone jack -extra camera sensor -faster These are the primary differences between the 6s Plus and 7 plus. The camera is the whole reason why I got the iPhone 6s Plus. It isn't good enough to upgrade. The zoom lens is just a zoom lens. There isn't even an OIS in the zoom lens either. Memory isn't much of a benefit since Apple decided to update the memory options for the 6s to match the 7 Plus. Wait for the S line or the 8 if you want to upgrade", ">>{Loutchiano} : I have the 6S, I switched from Android. The 6s is awesome, and 3D Touch is really a good feature. Everything is fast and smooth, the only negative point is the battery. If you use a lot of 4g it won't last a day, otherwise BL is correct. The plus version doesn't have this problem though", '>>{ismi2016} : Yup. At least with Republicans we know they are screwing us over. These other assholes screw us over while fooling us.', ">>{meowmeowman} : why didn't you just... buy a black iphone...", '>>{SpartanSK117} : I have done the same on my iPhone too! I put a black screen protector on and then covered the rest in a black micro-carbon fibre skin. Looks pretty nice!', '>>{Loxodontist} : I mean, sure, why not? What\'s one more "fuck you" to Native Americans?', ">>{kiarra33} : He figure it doesn't matter. He also thinks people don't care about progressive issues because they voted for Trump, so let them have this. He's probably really angry right now.", ">>{Scottydbeatbox} : They were out of stock and I'm not super caught up on what color I get. But I knew I wanted to put a tempered glass screen protector on for sure. I just tried something different for the hell of it.", ">>{Scottydbeatbox} : I was just about to do the same thing. Where'd you get your skin from?", ">>{currentsc0nvulsive} : I have the 6s, upgraded from the 5s a couple weeks after launch. I still love it, it does freeze up every so often but other than that I have no issues and still get fairly good battery life. Depending on the new features in the 7s I may upgrade this year, I'd kinda like more storage space (I have a 64gb but it's pretty full)", '>>{Methaxetamine} : You just described some problems aside from that no problems lol. My 6S had the battery issue too and now has the crappy Samsung chip but otherwise is fine.', ">>{bubbleawsome} : Yeah lol. I meant to say that the battery recall was fixed and honestly you don't hear of massive camera issues so it's not widespread. I guess I have had a few problems though. 😄", ">>{vanillabubbles16} : I've had it since December 2015, I still like it. Definitely don't see a reason to upgrade to the 7. I'll probably still use it for another year.", '>>{mr_mngr} : The fuck is going on? Honestly, I did not know much about this issue until recently. Trump is invested in this project. This wreaks of: here have your pipeline, now... about that ACA...', ">>{SilverIdaten} : Wow. Polluting the Missouri River and fucking over the Sioux reservation in the wake of President Trump. That'll be your legacy.", '>>{stufen1} : Obama pushed hard for the TPP. Bill Clinton signed NAFTA and the Telecommunications Act. We have an oligarchy interested in promoting the interests of big business over the interests of the people.', '>>{TIFUbyResponding} : Im actually doing the reverse. White front on my matte black plus. Looking forward to it even more after seeing your pics.', '>>{jnr_77} : You think Obama would do that? I have to say Obama is not my favorite president but come on....', ">>{flavaflavmissnewyork} : This is the stupidest thing I've read in this barrage of post-election idiocy. Congratulations, bud.", ">>{Scottydbeatbox} : Post pics when you get it done, I'd love to see the inverse.", '>>{mr_mngr} : Well, to be fair, that was a knee jerk reaction. If there is another explanation, I\'d be happy to hear it. But from two articles I\'ve read, it seems the only explanation is "well, it is inevitable now anyway" - but that doesn\'t justify this course of action, in my opinion. edit: Unless, by doing so, you try to bring this issue to the forefront while the election results are still fresh in everyone\'s head? Just spit balling here.', '>>{Ovidhalia} : I used to change screen protectors like crazy with my 6 and 6s and the black and white look was one I really liked. You can make it look a lot more seamless with a different case. http://imgur.com/MvzRhjN http://imgur.com/7dzemoK', '>>{bijan4187} : This is why democrats lost. Obama bever gave a fuck about progressives. Fuck his legacy, trump is his legacy for being beholden to the banks.', '>>{kiarra33} : Whatever if people cared about the environment that much Trump would have never been elected. Everyone knew his policies and they still stayed home OR worse voted for him.', '>>{bijan4187} : Know the enemy know yourself thats the politic. George bush (and obama) as bad as bin laden is.', '>>{polymerosa} : Well he did appoint a judge, who issued an injunction on the building while he reviewed both sides. The judge ruled their was no standing to stop construction. Its not on their land, technically. ND governor approves. I agree that it sucks, but I dont know what authority Obama has on it now.', ">>{Blueskymoon} : There's a product called uhippo or something like that for the home button. It works with Touch ID as well.", '>>{flavaflavmissnewyork} : That is not what you said. You said Obama likely would not have approved the Dakota Access Pipeline, but since Trump won, he said, "Fuck it!" out of pure anger. And that, again, is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.', ">>{jnr_77} : If Obama wasn't going to reroute, I would've preferred that he just did nothing and maybe Trump would. Not saying the odds were good, but this is awful.", ">>{kiarra33} : Well if Hillary won I don't think he would have approved it.", ">>{flavaflavmissnewyork} : Again, extremely naive. Obama is not going to make Trump or the Republicans' lives any easier than he's obliged to. Also, Hillary likely would have approved it given her previous stances on the Keystone Pipeline, so what you're saying doesn't make sense.", ">>{mr_mngr} : I wish I knew more about the topic. But I haven't read anything that suggests Trump's investment in the project would constitute a conflict of interest. I just don't understand the motivation for Obama to greenlight it at this particular moment.", ">>{jnr_77} : > I just don't understand the motivation for Obama to greenlight it at this particular moment. Neither do I.", ">>{kiarra33} : What was her previous stance on it? She at least made sure their was an environmenetal investigation to make sure it was stable, that's not happening this time. Lets's be honest people need to mobilize together and fight this hard right environmental policies, it's going to be hard but it's worth it in the end. People think it's going to be the same as Obama but it's not but luckily we have a voice and people just need to make it known in the next four years.", '>>{CollumMcJingleballs} : >Obama admin: No decision yet on controversial oil pipeline They changed the headline. lmao.', '>>{CollumMcJingleballs} : Obama is a terrible negotiator here. He could hold this off, order the National Guard to stop them from drilling and then when Trump gets into office and reverses it, Trump looks worse and is put in a bind. But that would be the rational thing.', '>>{novacham} : Even if he blocked it, Trump is just going to come in and approve it. At least President Obama is being realistic.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{bubbleawsome} : I've had my 6s since launch day. I don't plan to upgrade this year unless something amazing happens for the 10th anniversary. The first 6s I had got replaced because of the battery recall, and now this ones camera is messed up, but otherwise they've had no problems. Battery life on the one with battery issues was still easily 7 hours with me using it. Now it lasts nearly 12 hours. The phone is still fast and doesn't have any software issues. The 2GB RAM I think really separates it from the 6.", ">>{Flandersmcj} : 6S+. I've had mine about a year. I quite like it but I plan on going to a 7S+/8+ (whatever comes next).", ">>{ChiefsRoyalsFan} : I got the 6s+ about a month after launch. I love this phone but plan on getting the latest and greatest iPhone later this year whether it's the 7s+ or 8+.", ">>{TheArmandoV} : I've had mine since about 2 weeks after launch and I'm very happy with it. The camera is very tempting on the 7+ but I'll probably wait for the 8+ / 8s+ as it's still a very capable phone.", ">>{SpartanSK117} : Had my 6S since April 2016. Had a few issues such as having to replace the battery a few weeks ago and now having to go back again this week to get a new touch ID sensor. But other than that it's been the best phone I've ever had and my first iPhone. I don't see the 7 as a necessary upgrade because its only marginally faster and waterproofing isn't a big deal to me because I don't plan on putting my phone anywhere near it, but I think I'll wait for the so called 8 and see if its a worthy upgrade.", '>>{Jorgesarcos} : Ive had my 6s plus for about a year now, only issue is the aluminum corrosion that somehow got in the back, its tiny and ive never used it without its case, but it is there and i hate it :C', ">>{BaldRunnerGuy} : Had mine for a few months and love it. No plans to upgrade. I'll use it til it dies.", ">>{HansChr15} : As soon as the 7 Plus came out, I already decided not to get it. -water resistant -Higher color gambit -no headphone jack -extra camera sensor -faster These are the primary differences between the 6s Plus and 7 plus. The camera is the whole reason why I got the iPhone 6s Plus. It isn't good enough to upgrade. The zoom lens is just a zoom lens. There isn't even an OIS in the zoom lens either. Memory isn't much of a benefit since Apple decided to update the memory options for the 6s to match the 7 Plus. Wait for the S line or the 8 if you want to upgrade", ">>{Loutchiano} : I have the 6S, I switched from Android. The 6s is awesome, and 3D Touch is really a good feature. Everything is fast and smooth, the only negative point is the battery. If you use a lot of 4g it won't last a day, otherwise BL is correct. The plus version doesn't have this problem though", ">>{currentsc0nvulsive} : I have the 6s, upgraded from the 5s a couple weeks after launch. I still love it, it does freeze up every so often but other than that I have no issues and still get fairly good battery life. Depending on the new features in the 7s I may upgrade this year, I'd kinda like more storage space (I have a 64gb but it's pretty full)", '>>{Methaxetamine} : You just described some problems aside from that no problems lol. My 6S had the battery issue too and now has the crappy Samsung chip but otherwise is fine.', ">>{bubbleawsome} : Yeah lol. I meant to say that the battery recall was fixed and honestly you don't hear of massive camera issues so it's not widespread. I guess I have had a few problems though. 😄", ">>{vanillabubbles16} : I've had it since December 2015, I still like it. Definitely don't see a reason to upgrade to the 7. I'll probably still use it for another year."], ['>>{Scottydbeatbox} : Put a black screen protector on my white iPhone 7+. Turned out pretty well', ">>{Scottydbeatbox} : [Here's a link to the product I used](https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01KYNY69I/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1) [And a higher quality photo](http://i.imgur.com/uaAtbzj.jpg). It doesn't cover 100% of the front, so there are these very subtle white lines around the side edges which give it some contrast. Part of me is bothered by it because it's not perfect, but at the same time I genuinely think it looks pretty good.", ">>{Funkbass} : The result is cool but I still can't figure out how you took the picture.", ">>{meowmeowman} : why didn't you just... buy a black iphone...", '>>{SpartanSK117} : I have done the same on my iPhone too! I put a black screen protector on and then covered the rest in a black micro-carbon fibre skin. Looks pretty nice!', ">>{Scottydbeatbox} : They were out of stock and I'm not super caught up on what color I get. But I knew I wanted to put a tempered glass screen protector on for sure. I just tried something different for the hell of it.", ">>{Scottydbeatbox} : I was just about to do the same thing. Where'd you get your skin from?", '>>{TIFUbyResponding} : Im actually doing the reverse. White front on my matte black plus. Looking forward to it even more after seeing your pics.', ">>{Scottydbeatbox} : Post pics when you get it done, I'd love to see the inverse.", '>>{Ovidhalia} : I used to change screen protectors like crazy with my 6 and 6s and the black and white look was one I really liked. You can make it look a lot more seamless with a different case. http://imgur.com/MvzRhjN http://imgur.com/7dzemoK', ">>{Blueskymoon} : There's a product called uhippo or something like that for the home button. It works with Touch ID as well."], ['>>{madflavr} : Fuck the Democrats. There are not progressive or friends of progressive causes.', '>>{ismi2016} : Yup. At least with Republicans we know they are screwing us over. These other assholes screw us over while fooling us.', '>>{Loxodontist} : I mean, sure, why not? What\'s one more "fuck you" to Native Americans?', ">>{kiarra33} : He figure it doesn't matter. He also thinks people don't care about progressive issues because they voted for Trump, so let them have this. He's probably really angry right now.", '>>{mr_mngr} : The fuck is going on? Honestly, I did not know much about this issue until recently. Trump is invested in this project. This wreaks of: here have your pipeline, now... about that ACA...', ">>{SilverIdaten} : Wow. Polluting the Missouri River and fucking over the Sioux reservation in the wake of President Trump. That'll be your legacy.", '>>{stufen1} : Obama pushed hard for the TPP. Bill Clinton signed NAFTA and the Telecommunications Act. We have an oligarchy interested in promoting the interests of big business over the interests of the people.', '>>{jnr_77} : You think Obama would do that? I have to say Obama is not my favorite president but come on....', ">>{flavaflavmissnewyork} : This is the stupidest thing I've read in this barrage of post-election idiocy. Congratulations, bud.", '>>{mr_mngr} : Well, to be fair, that was a knee jerk reaction. If there is another explanation, I\'d be happy to hear it. But from two articles I\'ve read, it seems the only explanation is "well, it is inevitable now anyway" - but that doesn\'t justify this course of action, in my opinion. edit: Unless, by doing so, you try to bring this issue to the forefront while the election results are still fresh in everyone\'s head? Just spit balling here.', '>>{bijan4187} : This is why democrats lost. Obama bever gave a fuck about progressives. Fuck his legacy, trump is his legacy for being beholden to the banks.', '>>{kiarra33} : Whatever if people cared about the environment that much Trump would have never been elected. Everyone knew his policies and they still stayed home OR worse voted for him.', '>>{bijan4187} : Know the enemy know yourself thats the politic. George bush (and obama) as bad as bin laden is.', '>>{polymerosa} : Well he did appoint a judge, who issued an injunction on the building while he reviewed both sides. The judge ruled their was no standing to stop construction. Its not on their land, technically. ND governor approves. I agree that it sucks, but I dont know what authority Obama has on it now.', '>>{flavaflavmissnewyork} : That is not what you said. You said Obama likely would not have approved the Dakota Access Pipeline, but since Trump won, he said, "Fuck it!" out of pure anger. And that, again, is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.', ">>{jnr_77} : If Obama wasn't going to reroute, I would've preferred that he just did nothing and maybe Trump would. Not saying the odds were good, but this is awful.", ">>{kiarra33} : Well if Hillary won I don't think he would have approved it.", ">>{flavaflavmissnewyork} : Again, extremely naive. Obama is not going to make Trump or the Republicans' lives any easier than he's obliged to. Also, Hillary likely would have approved it given her previous stances on the Keystone Pipeline, so what you're saying doesn't make sense.", ">>{mr_mngr} : I wish I knew more about the topic. But I haven't read anything that suggests Trump's investment in the project would constitute a conflict of interest. I just don't understand the motivation for Obama to greenlight it at this particular moment.", ">>{jnr_77} : > I just don't understand the motivation for Obama to greenlight it at this particular moment. Neither do I.", ">>{kiarra33} : What was her previous stance on it? She at least made sure their was an environmenetal investigation to make sure it was stable, that's not happening this time. Lets's be honest people need to mobilize together and fight this hard right environmental policies, it's going to be hard but it's worth it in the end. People think it's going to be the same as Obama but it's not but luckily we have a voice and people just need to make it known in the next four years.", '>>{CollumMcJingleballs} : >Obama admin: No decision yet on controversial oil pipeline They changed the headline. lmao.', '>>{CollumMcJingleballs} : Obama is a terrible negotiator here. He could hold this off, order the National Guard to stop them from drilling and then when Trump gets into office and reverses it, Trump looks worse and is put in a bind. But that would be the rational thing.', '>>{novacham} : Even if he blocked it, Trump is just going to come in and approve it. At least President Obama is being realistic.']]

classify and reply

['>>{xoFoxtail} : How do you carry your iPhone 6/s +?', '>>{Fender6969} : Front pockets work fine for me. Are you planning on putting a case on your device?', '>>{Nicheslovespecies} : For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : Trump embodies the last gasps of a dying demographic--one that, for the good of the country, can't die off soon enough.", ">>{amfoejaoiem} : When the author can't come up with a single reason this might be useful it's a sign that they're struggling to create a piece people will click on. Here's a hint: no headphone jack = more space inside the phone for other stuff.", ">>{BlackTea14} : There is a critical distinction that should be drawn: it's not the *demographic* that's the issue, it's the worldview Trump's supporters subscribe to.", '>>{Sceme} : Have an Android phone thats slightly bigger and it has fit into every front pocket I have put it in.', ">>{moxy801} : I wish I remember the exact quote, but there is one that goes sort of like this: A privileged group experiences any loss of that privilege as 'oppression'.", ">>{Fender6969} : I used to use the Apple silicone case but I'm now using it with no case. For both scenarios it fit just fine. It was a perfect fit with no case.", '>>{iamsorri} : IMO I think "Airpods" is a great idea. Just think, why do you need the cable from ear to the phone? It breaks, gets tangled, uncomfortable to use while running, working out and so forth. I am not saying this is a ground breaking changes but I think it is for the better. There is a whole reason why bluetooth headphones exist for a reason because people want them. My only questions with the "Airpods" is that how much will the replacement cost? you know we lose them all the time.', '>>{Yolo20152016} : While media obsessed over Khan, look what Trump did for these Gold Star families...', ">>{Squircle_MFT} : What a crappy article, I don't like apple, but this article is shit. he blames the tech industry, but all he talks about is Apple, no wonder Yahoo was going under...", '>>{BlueTigerOrpheus} : Muslim boy, 7, beaten onboard school bus in North Carolina because of Donald Trump’s hateful rhetoric: father', ">>{conanthecnidarian} : >But isn’t it curious that while the media obsessed over one Gold Star family’s “interaction” with Donald Trump, they’ve all but ignored another one. Yes, while we were all hearing day and night about Khizr Khan last week, the Republican presidential nominee was quietly meeting with 10 Gold Star families privately. >No TV cameras, no script, no agenda. Uh, I'm pretty sure the agenda was to try to rehabilitate his image after he spent a week attacking the parents of a fallen soldier over their religion. What did he do for gold star families before he attacked the Kahn family. I don't care what he did after he was called out for being out of line. Everything he did after was just him groveling to pay for a boneheaded decision he made again and again over the course of a week.", '>>{annaheim} : Back pocket. I work in a cafe so I deal with lots of liquid and syrups and the last thing I want to have is water/dark chocolate in the ear speaker.', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : The anti-"PC" deplorables are working hard for the case to have hate speech laws in the US.', '>>{Je-Suis-Tobi} : Battery, storage, RAM, motherboard, chips and sensors, better DAC, the list goes on and on honestly', '>>{spacelincoln} : Holy shit, Cary? I was expecting like Fayetteville.', '>>{gooduser_name} : > Just think, why do you need the cable from ear to the phone? It breaks, gets tangled, uncomfortable to use while running, working out and so forth. I am not saying this is a ground breaking changes but I think it is for the better. Limiting options is never *for the better*. You don\'t need to remove headphone jack to introduce Airpods. >My only questions with the "Airpods" is that how much will the replacement cost? you know we lose them all the time. $159 only...', ">>{miashaee} : He did this stuff after people called him out for the insult to the khans. He doesn't care about the military or their families, other wise he wouldn't have insulted POWs or a gold star family to begin with.", '>>{BalanceCoil} : Yeah look more race baiting the Democrat go to. Fuck off NYT', '>>{KKK4Trump} : She learned long ago never to be alone with her father!!!!', '>>{Recklesslettuce} : Yahoo has been going under ever since the twin towers collapsed.', '>>{PeterCornswalled} : The kids are doing a public service. Now everyone will be watching the terrorist family more closely.', '>>{l3lC} : Or you could just make it a fraction of a millimeter larger and give us both. Heck, make it the thickness of the iPhone 5 again.', ">>{NotARobotSpider} : They had to do this for improved waterproofing. It's not that huge a deal. Large parts of these negative articles were pre-written before the announcement expecting to ride a tidal wave of negavitity to click-heaven.", ">>{aredfred} : If people don't like the lack of a headphone jack then they should just but a different phone. There are hundreds of options that include one.", ">>{iamreeterskeeter} : This is absolute bullshit. You can waterproof an audio jack. It is simply a way to force customers into buying more expensive garbage. Why haven't I bought bluetooth earbuds? Because I know I will lose one and I also don't want to deal with charging the damn things. I have enough trouble keeping my phone charged.", '>>{75000_Tokkul} : >The kids are doing a public service. Now everyone will be watching the terrorist family more closely. So /u/PeterCornswalled you are openly supporting this child being attacked?', ">>{TubaKid44} : I heard they removed the DAC since it's all digital until is outside the phone. Did they end up including one anyway?", '>>{WaltBush} : I think it went: "If you take power or things away from people, they get pissed."', '>>{1ceyou} : Here we go again, another media outlet perpetrating identity politics. Blacks vs Whites Mexican vs Whites Poor vs Whites Gays vs Whites and you wonder why there is so much violence, such as in Dallas where you have BLM shooter wanting to shoot "white cops" or you have protestors throwing rocks at Trump supporters " http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-trump-anaheim-security-20160525-snap-story.html"', '>>{prHat317} : Put in pocket when moving and take out when sitting down', '>>{trevize1138} : Another post poised to get people talking about Trump and racism! If you aren\'t yet aware, you must drink when you see the following: * "Give me one example of Trump being racist" * "That\'s not racist it\'s bigoted" * [copy+pasted dictionary definition of racism] * [mental gymnastics here] "therefore *leftists* are the racist ones!" * "SJW" If you see the following you must chug! * "Curiel blah blah blah La Raza blah blah \'the race\' in Spanish!"', '>>{0ne_Word} : I was a rare "poor white" when I was a kid. It was tough.', ">>{drew418} : I'll give you another one: >The hatred that men bear to privilege increases in proportion as privileges become fewer and less considerable, so that democratic passions would seem to burn most fiercely just when they have least fuel. I have already given the reason for this phenomenon. When all conditions are unequal, no inequality is so great as to offend the eye, whereas the slightest dissimilarity is odious in the midst of general uniformity; the more complete this uniformity is, the more insupportable the sight of such a difference becomes.", '>>{gooduser_name} : and tim cook definitely told you that they had to remove it for water proofing instead of that courage bullshit they said on stage. You clearly are not talking out of your ass...', '>>{VivaSativaz} : front pockets work just fine for me, I wear skinny jeans btw', '>>{GuavaMyPickle} : Just go old school and wear it in your front pockets. Simply buy jeans with bigger pockets for phones like the + iterations of the iPhone.', '>>{DAEFlair} : Are you really going to buy a vest to hold a fucking phone? And then have to wear it all the time so you can carry a phone? Dude wtf', '>>{NYCSCV} : This has to be the worst presidential campaign in modern history. Forced to pay lip service to families of veterans because he insulted one prior to this.', '>>{OZY1} : Correction: "While *Trump* obsessed over Khan..."', ">>{Yolo20152016} : Nope not at all http://www.nytimes.com/1995/11/10/nyregion/veterans-day-parade-tries-for-a-comeback.html You know who doesn't care about vets Hillary Clinton, she leaves her own people out to die. The Kahn's are a political pawn and they know it. John McCain is hated by many vets for fucking them over and rumored to have given up vital to the North, he was heard daily on a loud speaker promoting the North and there are recordings of it.", ">>{miashaee} : Well then they both don't care about our military, what's your point? After that POW comment I lost a ton of respect for Trump.......also the neo-nazi retweet against black people......and the discriminatory no Muslims allowed temporary ban suggestion.......and how he just joked about Hillary being shot.", '>>{allsortsashit} : We should bring the baggie jean look back again just for our devices. That was a comfy time.', ">>{ragonk_1310} : Wow, I can tell this is a bullshit article I and didn't even read it.", '>>{HarlanCedeno} : Have they been able to demonstrate any tangible benefit of the "other stuff" that they couldn\'t provide on previous models?', '>>{Astalano} : I think this is legitimate hate speech and just straight up racism. You should be straight up banned for this comment if the mods have any sense.', '>>{zhiked} : But, he noted, they have not been able to substantiate any of Usmani\'s claims. ""At this time, the information from the investigation does not support an altercation," Chadwick said. "No students who were interviewed witnessed an altercation. The bus driver did not witness an altercation. The child did not report the bus driver any injury.""', ">>{chazysciota} : I'm gonna go against the tide here and say pants pockets work great. That said, you should probably waste your money on that awful jacket.", ">>{1LT_Obvious} : I'm shocked. You guys usually don't poke your heads out of your safe space. The harsh rays of reality hurts your eyes.", ">>{xoFoxtail} : No, probably not. Looking over the stuff on that site, it seems a bit overkill for me. Though, I'd rather wear something like that than have my phone in a belt holster or something.", '>>{red_inthehead} : I read it as sarcasm. Please be sarcasm.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : He didn't joke about her being shot, come on he was making reference to the fact that the 2nd Amendment is a right to bear arms and it is unconstitutional right to restrict. She her self said “And here again, the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment. And I am going to make that case every chance I get.” So we as voters need to remember that she will try to take away those rights. If she is elected we have the right to fight such laws. Take it how you want to. What NEo-Nazi tweet about black people? ISIS said they would use refugees to attack us, so why is that such an issue. The current administration isn't doing anything about ISIS to solve the problem to then allow people in once ISIS is taken care of. You people are so sensitive.", '>>{miashaee} : He talked about how President Hillary would be picking Supreme Court justices and there is nothing anyone could do to stop her..........save maybe the second amendment people. Sounds at BEST like a sloppy call for unity and at WORST like someone could shoot Hillary (or one of her nominees) to stop her. That was NOT smart, more self-inflicted wounds for Donald.........how is it that he is SOOOO horrible at this?', '>>{workingwisdom} : I posted a similar hate-crime attacker citing Trump a week or so ago but it got deleted. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-hate-crime_us_57f7a872e4b0b6a430317efa', '>>{therealhood} : Wow is that a trump quote..... lmfao..... can you image any worthwhile quote from this guy', ">>{workingwisdom} : Can you think of anything behind the Trump movement that is not hate-based? It feeds off of fear, whether it is grounded in reality or not isn't as important.", '>>{Yolo20152016} : Well she did say she the Supreme Court was wrong she was going to do something about it. freebeacon.com/politics/leaked-audio-clinton-says-supreme-court-is-wrong-on-second-amendment/', '>>{therealhood} : Saying shit like that is why you live a lonely life and no one really likes you....', ">>{TubaKid44} : Author forgot a fourth option. Buy an Android where nothing is proprietary. He should know by now that all of Apple's decisions are made based on what they can do to force people to stay within their ecosystem. It's only going to get worse. I recommend jumping off of the granny smith train while you still can.", ">>{xoFoxtail} : That's really all I wear too. The problem with women's jeans is they make the pockets so small on them, at least everywhere I shop. Maybe I can find something a little bigger at Walmart, hate shopping there though.", '>>{therealhood} : But you had privileges..... cause I grew up poor and white and basically everything was easy', '>>{lensgrabber} : Kuhl pants, side pockets, 6+ w/ case fits perfect', ">>{gooduser_name} : > Which isn't actually a bad deal for Bluetooth headphones If you take $29 headphones and make them wireless with a crappy DAC, then sold them for $159, it is...", '>>{BannedbytheKlan} : Alexis de Tocqueville\'s 1840 book "Democracy in America" is the source of that quote.', ">>{myballsareitchy} : Back pocket. I don't like the way it looks/feels in my front pocket.", ">>{Zvne} : I wear girl pants as a guy (guy pants aren't tight enough) so I feel your pain on this a bit. My front pockets are tiny or sometimes fake. I've been using my back right pocket forever and it works pretty well.", '>>{HarlanCedeno} : Author makes some good points. Has Apple been able to demonstrate any benefit for the user from removing the headphone jack?', '>>{43218} : Shouldnt you at least wait till the dead cops are buried to start your race baiting anew?', ">>{TristinPerry} : If you're a woman, a small bag along with your other stuff would work well. But if you're a man, then most pants will work fine. 1/8 of my pants don't fit the 6S+ entirely but all of my other pants and shorts can hold it very comfortably   Edit: I totally missed the part about you not liking bags. My girlfriend just carries her phone in her hands or in a little wristlet since most if not all of her pants can't fit her 6. I know you said you don't like bags but [Coach](http://www.coach.com/shop/women-wristlets?t1Id=5000000000000013510&t2Id=5000000000000013510&t3Id=5000000000000013513&spu=0&cid=S_G193525) has small wristlets that can carry a phone as well. I wouldn't shell out the money on a vest just to carry your phone.", ">>{miashaee} : Who gives a crap when compared to Donald and his dumpster fire campaign. He is literally the worst candidate that I have ever seen for president, never thought I'd be happy to be voting for Hillary Clinton......wow.", '>>{spacelincoln} : Oh, absolutely. I grew up in the Philly suburbs and it was very Republican.', '>>{3y3-000} : Really? After a long day of carrying around my plus phone it tends to leave marks on my slim fit jeans :/', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : Absolutely deplorable. The only way things like this happen is if the parents have such virulent hatred at home that their kids are able to pick up on it. I hope social services takes them all away.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : It does matter Trump isn't going after anyone's constitutional rights, with the possible exception of anchor babies. She is going to destroy the 2nd amendment. He is proving the media's false narratives, because he never said to shoot anybody", ">>{DrunkenEffigy} : How ~~Christian~~ of you to promote the vigilante style beating of innocent children, I'm sure Jesus would approve. Edit: whoops my bad, how Mormon of you.", '>>{miashaee} : Well he should have said that instead of what might have been a "hey maybe someone could shoot her" comment. Man this guy has no idea what he is doing, I can\'t believe the GOP nominated him, did they actually think that this stuff would fly in the general election when people started to pay attention? Lol', ">>{VivaSativaz} : Happens to me too sometimes with certain pants, it doesn't really bother me though :)", '>>{bitfriend} : The whole notion that "whites are a dying demographic" (when the term *white* itself is mostly made up) is what fuels the GOP. Lending this *false* theory credence makes them stronger. Regardless, 70% (if not more) of the country is white. They make up a majority. Not promoting their interests means loosing elections. Even Obama understood this in 2008: which is why he went out of his way to get friendly with the (overwhelmingly white) Unions so he could get swing states. As white majority areas experience brain drain to blue cities (especially LA, Chicago, NYC), they\'ll become much redder. This is a huge problem given that the net movement isn\'t enough to effect congressional apportionment. Which means an overall redder government. This is why Congress is entirely GOP run now. The Presidency is the last place blue cities are hanging on to, and only because of a handful of swing states.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : He is brash and people aren't like that anymore, honestly his voters could careless about GOPers bitching about him. They stopped representing us a long time ago and I am happy we are flushing them out. Really there is no two party system anymore it's a one party system that acts like you have opinions.", ">>{gooduser_name} : There's no DAC in the phone. A crappy version of DAC will be in BOTH earbuds...", '>>{iamsorri} : bro you didn\'t even answer my questions. what are you talking about? we are not talking about limiting someone\'s rights or freedoms. we are talking about a piece of product. so when the first iphone or smartphones came out did you say keyboard should be part of cellphone because "limiting options is never for the better"?', '>>{wekiva} : I have a 6+ and carry it in the pocket of my tee shirts-case and all. I simply will not buy tee shirts without a pocket. I suggest the more robust tee shirts for less sag, Carhart tee shirts are one brand I like.', ">>{MinisterforFun} : Thing is, when I had the 4 and the 5, I always had a bag with me. I always carried a sling bag with me so when i got the bigger phone, there wasn't any change to my usage as I'd always been placing my phone inside.", ">>{throwaway029384756} : Come on now, you know we just read headlines and comment. Don't go adding facts to the discussion.", ">>{Techsupportvictim} : Have you thought about a belt bag. I don't mean one of those 80s fanny pack gigs but something slicker looking. They have been quite the rage with folks that don't want to carry a back pack or purse.", '>>{miashaee} : Yeah but everyone else will cause him to lose in a MASSIVE fashion, this is hillarious honestly. Is the GOP base really this out of touch with the rest of America? If so they need to get out more. Lol', ">>{fishrobe} : That's cool. I can tell you're an idiot and I don't even know you.", '>>{zhiked} : But, he noted, they have not been able to substantiate any of Usmani\'s claims. ""At this time, the information from the investigation does not support an altercation," Chadwick said. "No students who were interviewed witnessed an altercation. The bus driver did not witness an altercation. The child did not report the bus driver any injury.""', ">>{spacelincoln} : Equally likely that the kids didn't report because of mob mentality, the bus driver is, you know, driving a bus, and it's not uncommon for victims to underreport out of fear.", '>>{madleon1} : Go live in Africa and let us know how that works out for you.', ">>{xoFoxtail} : I haven't. But, since you mentioned it, I thought I'd see what they are. [This](https://www.etsy.com/listing/224500524/belt-bag-black-leather-flat-bum-bag-hip?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=shopping_us_a-bags_and_purses-fanny_packs&utm_custom1=a5e60367-fabd-47bf-8581-d6463e9b0de7&gclid=CISR9pKAlM0CFQUFaQod9fUK7Q) and [this](http://www.nastygal.com/accessories/nila-anthony-im-a-suede-4-u-belt-bag?currency_code=US&country_code=US&gdffi=95a32e235beb40efb4f6ae9f6aa9b3c1&gdfms=84B940B9F63E42A5AEBAC5580D6CA34D&gclid=COqp966AlM0CFYkCaQodoeIBWQ) look really nice. I might look into them more when I get home from work. Thanks for the suggestion!", '>>{Yolo20152016} : They said that about the primaries too and he beat 16 others by a more votes than all of them combined. Classic liberals and quietly supporting him and so are libertarians. He is brash but his policies are clear and direct, he is not a politician and he is not double talking us.', ">>{CanlStillBeGarth} : They're racists, there's not really that much to it.", '>>{amfoejaoiem} : Battery, Processor, improved reliability. Literally any component in the phone could be made bigger or more reliable with more space.', ">>{miashaee} : They said that when he was up in the polls in the primary (which was wrong) that and it was the GOP primary so not many minorities. The general election is a COMPLETELY different ball game especially for the GOP. This is going to be a slaughter and if you don't see why then that might explain why your side (if you're a Trump supporter) will lose.", '>>{cam94509} : It\'s an interesting quote, but I\'m not 100% sure I follow it\'s relevance. It seems to me that this just says we\'re particularly good at recognizing inequality as it gets slighter, which actually makes such notions as "reverse racism" nonsense, because we\'d notice that slight difference extremely strongly no matter which direction it goes.', ">>{listerminty} : Pants pocket. It'll fit; it's not a laptop.", ">>{trevize1138} : > bittet ...hilaary I see you're playing the game, too.", '>>{thisisATHENS} : Where does this racist hate come from? It is so odd.', '>>{therealhood} : It was a joke... trump would have trouble reading that quote', '>>{JacobCrim88} : As a Raleigh resident I too am surprised. Cary is generally stereotyped as boring and cardboard cut out suburbs. Its crazy that even those places are being tainted.', ">>{amfoejaoiem} : This is a product design decision and everything has tradeoffs. Yes, 1/4 mm makes a difference. Everything makes a difference. They're going to sell 100 M of these things, for almost $1000 a piece, it's really important to think about the details. The executives at Apple get paid shitloads of money to agonize over every detail. They think about the size of peoples's hands, the extra 30 minutes of battery life they might get you. Getting rid of this has cons, as does every product design decision, but it also has pros, and the fact that the article didn't even touch on them shows what a biased attack piece it was. Have you ever worked in product development?", ">>{Benthetraveler} : Yeah but I really didn't plan on dying due to alcohol poisoning today.", ">>{amfoejaoiem} : No, they don't do demonstrations of stuff like that because putting together a demo for something so obvious would be asinine. More space inside of a phone = better battery, processor, camera. Literally every component in the phone could be made better if it had more room.", ">>{toadofsteel} : And what's worse is that if hate speech laws get written in violation of the First Amendment, then I'd probably be the first thrown into jail. No, I don't have any problems with someone's race, religion, or sexual orientation. But you haven't heard some of the vile things that come out of my mouth when the Philadelphia Eagles come to town.", '>>{zhiked} : and muslims have reported fake hate crimes before. unless there is proof, this should be taken with a grain of salt', '>>{Yolo20152016} : He has the support but they have trouble supporting him because they get attacked by those who do not have an opened mind https://youtu.be/r9hXx6_Fzgs Great video that explains what the black voters are experiencing Hillary wants to go to war https://youtu.be/-Ivt2NmbyGg', '>>{therealhood} : No, there is no white privilege there is financial privilege .... its always been that way', ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : Oh, I follow what you are saying. We are on the same page. It's cool.", '>>{spacelincoln} : Lol, the NYG, PHI rivalry kills me. I was at the last eagles game in the old NYG stadium and the entire stadium started barking like dogs when Michael Vick took the field.', ">>{miashaee} : I'm black, I don't buy that, may experience has been that black people HATE Trump, it's the one group that is universally against him (for the most part). I mean if you look at the favorability ratings like 94% of black people have an unfavorable view of Trump and in some polls he gets 0% support from black voters in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Funny thing is I picked that Trump would win the primary for the GOP about a year ago, mostly because of ethnic and religious resentments......and the polls. I said Trump will win the GOP, Hillary would win the DNC, and Hillary would beat Trump. It was an easy call based on a variety of factors.", ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : Yeah, accept that's not what you or other racists in this thread are saying. You are saying white people, not Trump Supporters.", ">>{therealhood} : OJ was black..... and rich..... what do you think shielded MJ from pediphile charges.... that's right dolla dolla bill.. same thing that shielded wall street bankers....etc etc.", ">>{BlackTea14} : I think it's pretty obvious that I'm talking about Trump supporter's worldview (see my last comment) so spare me the white victim complex routine.", '>>{reddit-account7} : But they made it thinner so there is less space', '>>{Je-Suis-Tobi} : Not so. There needs to be a DAC for the internal speaker to work, and it will be what powers speakers when using the lightning to 3.5mm adapter.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : I mean, I can't comment on your experience but I agree that seems to be the case. But in all honesty I hate that it is even looked at that way. We are all Americans and I want my neighbors to have the same opportunities that I do and have the same ability to work hard and be successful. I don't care about race or color, I want everyone to have a chance at the American Dream and I want share my yard and have bbq's with them. There is too much division and deception by the media and they paint someone like me as a racist and bigot. However, I have an amazing job working with inner city youths with psychological disorders. I was an administrator but I broke up fight and ended up falling 5 feet off an embankment on my head, I suffered a TBI and chose to step down. I chose to work direct care with them, because I didn't want to get out of the field and I actually enjoy it more. These kids keep me going and despite the TBI issues. I just want a better for them and everyone else, regardless if they like me or not.", ">>{BlackTea14} : How so? If you've developed a victim complex centered around your racial identity, you've got a white victim complex.", '>>{miashaee} : Dude, Trump retweeted a neo-nazi propaganda post against black people with stereotypical racist imagery, you don\'t get to say "we\'re all Americans" after that.', ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : Hush little racist don't you cry, every one is equal in the laws eyes. If you think that you are special. You are racist, you little rectum.", '>>{Kantina} : All that impotent anger and violence has to go somewhere. Only your tiny hands be it, Donnie.', '>>{BlackTea14} : Do you even know what you mean by your own words?', '>>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : I\'m messing with you man, calm down. Seriously though dude y\'all say "Trump people" it sounds like a dog whistle for white people I don\'t like.', ">>{spacelincoln} : I can't find one that comes from a reputable source. Don't let that throw your narrative. Even if there is some, the number pales in comparison to the very real hate crimes. You don't happen to be a MRA rape apologist too?", ">>{9001_Dalmatians} : The Republicans are terrorists. There's no real way to dispute that anymore.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : The NEO-Nazi sherif star? That originated from a NEO-Nazi Twitter account but it was being used throughout the Internet before he used it on his Tweet. I believe I saw it on the_donald or Facebook right before he tweeted it. Unless you knew that it came directly from a NEO-Nazi page you wouldn't see the issue. I admit there are some bad apples that like that probably follow such nazis and that's how it got spread. But it's two way street. The KKK is still a democrat based organization. The Nazi's were. A Socialist party. There is evil all around us , but there are also good people too.", '>>{trevize1138} : OMG! The little known "2X Race Bait" rule! CHUG! CHUG! CHUG!', '>>{fkdsla} : > and muslims have reported fake hate crimes before. Cite.', '>>{Je-Suis-Tobi} : I\'m not trying to defend Apple, personally I think that people just waste their money on iPhones when they aren\'t that great, and they always end up getting screwed over in the end, however I think that if you had a phone the thickness of the iPhone 5 and a 5.5" screen it would be a bit much', ">>{43218} : You're gonna love president trump. Keep shooting cops. .. working great so far!", '>>{miashaee} : Nooooo, I was referring to the post with a black "thug" holding a gun surrounded with false murder stats that said black people are responsible for 81% of white murders from a made up statistics institute that Trump retweeted from a neo-nazi. Yeah that\'s what I am talking about, not the other times he retweetd a neo-nazi. Like I said you don\'t get to pretend that race doesn\'t matter to you after you do some stuff like that, and as far as I am concerned Trump has EARNED his disdain from the black community. He has no basis to complain if not a single black person votes for him and it costs him Ohio and Pennslvania (which based on the demographic makeup of those states that would be the difference).', ">>{Yolo20152016} : m.motherjones.com/mojo/2015/11/most-fascinating-thing-about-donald-trumps-racist-tweet If it is any consolation extremely liberal mother jones explained the situation. An apology would have been good but I guess the pole numbers went up. dailycaller.com/2015/06/20/flashback-as-governor-bill-clinton-honored-confederacy-on-arkansas-flag/ I personally just see Hillary as a racist wolf in Sheeps clothing her past is riddled with segregation and questions from her mentor KKK Robert Byrd to Bill's honoring of the confederate flag (then denouncing it), the white only golf course. The laws that her and Bill pushed through that targets black people and then gives mandatory sentencing to low level drug offenses. Why does someone with crack get like 10 more years of sentencing than cocaine? Spending 50 years in jail for pot? Then she helped craft and create a law that takes children out of the home and puts them in foster care and it made it that much easier to terminate parent rights. She has single handily destroyed hundreds of thousands of families through the mandatory sentencing and child removal laws. Trump isn't an angel and he has his questions but this woman has played a hand in placing 673,000 American citizens in prison and pushed laws that have ripped thousands of children from their homes and families. I see her and Bill's impact everyday. Those are just my reasons and I respect yours.", '>>{miashaee} : That doesn\'t change anything about what I said about Trump, he doesn\'t get to play the "race doesn\'t matter" card anymore. That being said I do have issues with Hillary, they just aren\'t as big......that and I don\'t think she might be crazy.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : I see your point with that, it should have never been posted and I can see why others feel that way too. That being said, I know that Trump or Hillary for that matter isn't going to wave a magic wand and puff everything is fixed. It is going to take work, and the best way to fix social issues is jobs. It is up to us to fix the cracks in our society. But it is easier when people have a way to earn a good living and not resent the other for what they have. For our sake I hope that one of them can do that, I just don't see how Hillary's plan is any different than what we have seen the last 40 years.", ">>{miashaee} : No one can, this is an infrastrcual issue. Neither can fix this and if people think either can then they are fools. You're best bet is to be in the haves group, that's what I worked hard to get into for about 20 years......good luck to you man.", ">>{Old_Army90} : The day sports franchises are made a protected class is when we know we've gone full dystopia.", '>>{spacelincoln} : To be fair, Cowboys fans are probably the most hated group in this country. Unless you count the group consisting of only Tom Brady and Bill Belichick', ">>{chefr89} : I mean, go take a look at places like Breitbart and you won't be surprised this stuff happens. They have an article today about Hillary being up big with Muslim-Americans, and the top comment is 'Terrorists for Hillary,' and pretty much all of them reference that in some way. I feel like Reagan did, except the other way around. I didn't leave the GOP, the GOP left me. I just hope they are the vocal minority in our party, but I have my doubts with news like this and everything else that has happened this election.", '>>{IsmaelGoldbergStein} : >out of safe space > r/politics What?', ">>{PeterCornswalled} : He needs to learn worshiping Satan is evil. This may be the start of the path that leads him to salvation in Christ. Spare the rod and you soil the child. The Devil must be beaten from him if there's no other way.", '>>{viperabyss} : As someone who just moved to NC (Cary, no less) from CA, I wonder if people would attempt to block me from voting at the voting booth.', ">>{JamisonP} : Haven't seen any Republicans show up at a democratic rivals rally and shut it down and intimidate act aggressively towards the supporters there. Democrats on the other hand, they do that consistently. Very brown shirty.", '>>{1LT_Obvious} : Hate of Trump is all over Reddit, love of him is like 95% contained within r/The_Donald and a handful of other alt-right safe spaces.', ">>{neonerz} : And doesn't it have one of the best school systems in the US? Very surprising to see this was in Cary. I guess I chose to move to the right side of Raleigh.", ">>{DrunkenEffigy} : Never mind that search that username on google you get https://web.archive.org/web/20161014145609/http://petercornswalled.blogspot.com/?view=timeslide I'm legit terrified people like this exist, to make it worse he says he has a congrigation. This guy literally believes the [Tod Akin legitimate rape defense.](https://web.archive.org/save/_embed/http://petercornswalled.blogspot.com/2012/03/the-myth-of-rape-pregnancies.html?view=magazinel)", ">>{Decon-III} : Do you see how /u/d_plorable and /u/PeterCornswalled aren't banned yet?", ">>{twinscull} : If anyone bothered to read the article there's no evidence to support this. This scumbag father is using his son to try to score political points and this has nothing to do with Trump. There's profit in being a victim these days.", ">>{AnnaTrocity} : They're all temporarily embarrassed wealthy members of the ruling class. The women, and the brown people, and the black people, and the gay people and the non-Christian people are trying to oppress them and keep them from getting what this world owes them: untold riches and 40 virgins. Their savior Donald Trump will put them back in power and make sure no one ever tries to make them face reality ever again.", '>>{IsmaelGoldbergStein} : r/politics is just as guilty. In May Clinton was the devil and Bernie was Jesus returned to this Earth. Now, Trump is LITERALLY HITLER (TM) and "Clinton" has become synonymous with nothing more than "not Trump". I think we need to look at the world with more complexity than is reflected on most of the subreddits. To say the world is black and white is the biggest pitfall the Reddit hivemind creates.', '>>{DoktorSoviet} : You are bad at this. Whatever it is you are trying to do, you are currently doing it poorly.', '>>{alienuser007} : Why am I not surprised that Hillary supporters are not aware of this kind of crap, its what happens when you live in a safe space. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3390765/Birmingham-teenager-lied-punched-wearing-hijab-Paris-massacre.html https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Fake_Anti-Muslim_Hate_Crimes_and_Other_Lies', '>>{DrunkenEffigy} : Again I would like to point out the hypocrisy of your claimed religion and the actions you are calling for. You think John Smith or Jesus would be ok with the vigilantly style beating of children. Never mind the fact I disagree with corporal punishment for other reasons, the passage you refer to is talking about discipline from the father not a mob of incensed children. Edit: fun fact "spare the rod..." does not appear in the bible the closest is “He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.” The passage you are referring to was actually written by Samuel Butler, a cheeky British poet who enjoyed mocking religious extremists and hypocrites.', '>>{Lawschoolfool} : The only difference is they have no interest in 72 virgins.', ">>{ragonk_1310} : Likewise, friend. Read article and tell me it's valid.", '>>{Meowymeow88} : There are many instances of Trump supporters being harassed and physically attacked. They are not upvoted on /r/politics because they do not fit the narrative.', '>>{andyhill420} : Well done, I hope you feel great about that outburst.', ">>{1LT_Obvious} : I don't think the world is black and white, but I've already made my decision as to which candidate is more dangerous to put into power. I still look at all mounting evidence objectively, but it is clear which candidate is digging their hole 10x as quickly. >I think we need to look at the world with more complexity than is reflected on most of the subreddits. To say the world is black and white is the biggest pitfall the Reddit hivemind creates. I don't disagree at all, but I think Trump supporters need to adhere to this advice just as much.", '>>{19djafoij02} : Trump, Daesh, and Brexit have shown how easy it is for people to be radicalized in the heartland of Western democracy. "Nice people" in places like the suburban research triangle, Long Island, "middle England", and Muslim communities in Ottawa, Provence, and Stockholm aren\'t that much less susceptible to ultranationalism and violent extremism than we\'d like to think as westerners. Western values are a treasure we must fight to defend, not something inherent in our race or culture.', '>>{NapoleonBonerparts} : You decide to discredit an entire group of people because someone lied one time? I hate to tell you, people in position of authority have lied in the past to keep the status quo. Does that mean the principal is untrustworthy? Your first argument from the article has merit, but your second argument lacks critical thinking.', '>>{Quexana} : This took place in Cary. And Cary is one of the more liberal towns in NC serving as a mostly wealthy suburb of the larger cities in the Triangle. Now imagine the shit going down in the real small towns, especially those in Eastern NC.', ">>{PenisBeautyCream} : The article says the bus driver didn't witness any altercation. Probably because school bus drivers don't give two shits about what happens on the bus and therefore tune out everything going on behind them.", '>>{zhiked} : But, he noted, they have not been able to substantiate any of Usmani\'s claims. ""At this time, the information from the investigation does not support an altercation," Chadwick said. "No students who were interviewed witnessed an altercation. The bus driver did not witness an altercation. The child did not report the bus driver any injury.""', ">>{cakebatter} : > unless there is proof, this should be taken with a grain of salt I mean the kid had cuts, scrapes, bruises, and a sprain, so there's that?", '>>{Salammar77} : As a North Carolinian. I have never seen such. However, I have never seen a line either.', ">>{cakebatter} : We need to get rid of the 2 party system and I see a great opportunity to do so rising from the burning ashes of the GOP. I'm a technically unaffiliated but I'm liberal and have always voted Dem, but I'm hoping the GOP implosion will result in the split of the Republican party into multiple smaller parties allowing the Dem party to split up a bit too.", ">>{cakebatter} : No, they don't seem to be too discriminating in the type of pussy they grab.", ">>{NapoleonBonerparts} : Now with the Donnal, Republicans are an alt right group who are extremely religious, hate women and gays. Congrats, republicans! You're the American Taliban! Just kidding, they were already that way before Trump.", '>>{IsmaelGoldbergStein} : Oh thank you for giving me a voice on a forum. I should be so grateful simpletons like me can even speak to marvelous keyboard gods such as yourself.', ">>{cakebatter} : Sure, I've seen lots of stories about protestors/rally attenders/people wearing MAGA hats getting into altercations/attacked. But I haven't seen any about school children being bullied by kids of Hillary supporters, and there are **lots** of [reports of kids of Trump supporters bullying minorities.](https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/splc_the_trump_effect.pdf)", ">>{19djafoij02} : So many people in the US are saying this. They never thought their neighbor, boss, coworker, or employee could become radicalized into believing that there's a global conspiracy against them. Muslims have known for some time that wealth and education are only so effective against a sufficiently motivated extremist group.", '>>{excitebyke} : >Now imagine the shit going down in the real small towns, especially those in Eastern NC. id prefer articles/proof, over my imagination.', '>>{cakebatter} : Well, you know, the kid had physical signs of being attacked. And the guy is *moving back to Pakistan* so it\'s tough to tell what kind of "political points" he\'s looking to score.', '>>{zhiked} : i say they HAVE, not they always do. and muslims have lied before too. lots of people lie. im just saying that that has happened before, and COULD happen again.', '>>{spacelincoln} : British tabloid and a alt right blog. Gotcha.', ">>{Goredrak} : You wouldn't know a fact if it walked up and grabbed you by the pussy.", ">>{NapoleonBonerparts} : Have these people lied about it before? Is there a relation between those people and these people? Otherwise it's completely irrelevant.", '>>{spacelincoln} : I was just impressed at the social cooperation. Plus the guy behind me that was so drunk at the beginning of the game that he face planted into the row ahead of me.', ">>{toadofsteel} : Oh its not the franchise I would be spewing hate speech against, it's their fans.", '>>{Jaggle} : Yeah, just a few 10 and 13 year olds will do, thanks', '>>{excitebyke} : thanks, see, no need for an imagination.', ">>{JamisonP} : Not sure what you mean. I can't think of a single time when Trump supporters, or even crazy tea party fanatics showed up en masse to infiltrate and protest Bernie or Hillary's rallies. I can easily point to several instances where their supporters DID do that to Trump rallies, one - Chicago - going so far as forcing Trump to cancel his rally. That's the literal definition of fascism, and it's being peddled by the left. So, don't know where you get off in supporting the claim that 'The Republicans are terrorists'.", ">>{malaislinn} : But why are they racist, what makes them racist? People aren't just born racists. If we shut the humanity of people off with one easy label, we're not doing anything much differently.", ">>{silentbobsc} : But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most, our one fellow and brother who most needed a friend yet had not a single one, the one sinner among us all who had the highest and clearest right to every Christian's daily and nightly prayers, for the plain and unassailable reason that his was the first and greatest need, he being among sinners the supremest? - Mark Twain", ">>{CleverGirlwithadd} : The bus driver said he didn't see an altercation?! To me that's more disturbing.", '>>{alienuser007} : Yep, totally ignore all the mainstream sources listed. Typical Hillary supporter, back to your safe space!', ">>{9001_Dalmatians} : Trump does. Difference being that he doesn't want to wait until the afterlife to grope them.", '>>{spacelincoln} : Yep, 2 incidents discount the several thousand incidents in the last 10 years.', ">>{d_plorable} : lol i told you we're in this bitch and you can't do anything about it except keep crying.", ">>{coned_miro} : Finally, I've always wanted to know the truths about Dinosaurs... oh wait, I'veread a textbook or two in my day ------------------------------------- I voted early in Virginia for Hillary! REMEMBER TO VOTE AND DO YOUR PART! [Find out how!](https://g.co/kgs/zr3iTl)", ">>{BooG690} : Why does everyone go crazy when one innocent person is wrongfully imprisoned but it's okay to wrongfully accuse an innocent bystander of committing a hate crime?"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{BlueTigerOrpheus} : Muslim boy, 7, beaten onboard school bus in North Carolina because of Donald Trump’s hateful rhetoric: father', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : The anti-"PC" deplorables are working hard for the case to have hate speech laws in the US.', '>>{spacelincoln} : Holy shit, Cary? I was expecting like Fayetteville.', '>>{PeterCornswalled} : The kids are doing a public service. Now everyone will be watching the terrorist family more closely.', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : >The kids are doing a public service. Now everyone will be watching the terrorist family more closely. So /u/PeterCornswalled you are openly supporting this child being attacked?', ">>{ragonk_1310} : Wow, I can tell this is a bullshit article I and didn't even read it.", '>>{zhiked} : But, he noted, they have not been able to substantiate any of Usmani\'s claims. ""At this time, the information from the investigation does not support an altercation," Chadwick said. "No students who were interviewed witnessed an altercation. The bus driver did not witness an altercation. The child did not report the bus driver any injury.""', ">>{1LT_Obvious} : I'm shocked. You guys usually don't poke your heads out of your safe space. The harsh rays of reality hurts your eyes.", '>>{red_inthehead} : I read it as sarcasm. Please be sarcasm.', '>>{workingwisdom} : I posted a similar hate-crime attacker citing Trump a week or so ago but it got deleted. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-hate-crime_us_57f7a872e4b0b6a430317efa', ">>{workingwisdom} : Can you think of anything behind the Trump movement that is not hate-based? It feeds off of fear, whether it is grounded in reality or not isn't as important.", '>>{spacelincoln} : Oh, absolutely. I grew up in the Philly suburbs and it was very Republican.', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : Absolutely deplorable. The only way things like this happen is if the parents have such virulent hatred at home that their kids are able to pick up on it. I hope social services takes them all away.', ">>{DrunkenEffigy} : How ~~Christian~~ of you to promote the vigilante style beating of innocent children, I'm sure Jesus would approve. Edit: whoops my bad, how Mormon of you.", ">>{throwaway029384756} : Come on now, you know we just read headlines and comment. Don't go adding facts to the discussion.", ">>{fishrobe} : That's cool. I can tell you're an idiot and I don't even know you.", '>>{zhiked} : But, he noted, they have not been able to substantiate any of Usmani\'s claims. ""At this time, the information from the investigation does not support an altercation," Chadwick said. "No students who were interviewed witnessed an altercation. The bus driver did not witness an altercation. The child did not report the bus driver any injury.""', ">>{spacelincoln} : Equally likely that the kids didn't report because of mob mentality, the bus driver is, you know, driving a bus, and it's not uncommon for victims to underreport out of fear.", ">>{CanlStillBeGarth} : They're racists, there's not really that much to it.", '>>{JacobCrim88} : As a Raleigh resident I too am surprised. Cary is generally stereotyped as boring and cardboard cut out suburbs. Its crazy that even those places are being tainted.', ">>{toadofsteel} : And what's worse is that if hate speech laws get written in violation of the First Amendment, then I'd probably be the first thrown into jail. No, I don't have any problems with someone's race, religion, or sexual orientation. But you haven't heard some of the vile things that come out of my mouth when the Philadelphia Eagles come to town.", '>>{zhiked} : and muslims have reported fake hate crimes before. unless there is proof, this should be taken with a grain of salt', '>>{spacelincoln} : Lol, the NYG, PHI rivalry kills me. I was at the last eagles game in the old NYG stadium and the entire stadium started barking like dogs when Michael Vick took the field.', '>>{Kantina} : All that impotent anger and violence has to go somewhere. Only your tiny hands be it, Donnie.', ">>{spacelincoln} : I can't find one that comes from a reputable source. Don't let that throw your narrative. Even if there is some, the number pales in comparison to the very real hate crimes. You don't happen to be a MRA rape apologist too?", ">>{9001_Dalmatians} : The Republicans are terrorists. There's no real way to dispute that anymore.", '>>{fkdsla} : > and muslims have reported fake hate crimes before. Cite.', ">>{Old_Army90} : The day sports franchises are made a protected class is when we know we've gone full dystopia.", '>>{spacelincoln} : To be fair, Cowboys fans are probably the most hated group in this country. Unless you count the group consisting of only Tom Brady and Bill Belichick', ">>{chefr89} : I mean, go take a look at places like Breitbart and you won't be surprised this stuff happens. They have an article today about Hillary being up big with Muslim-Americans, and the top comment is 'Terrorists for Hillary,' and pretty much all of them reference that in some way. I feel like Reagan did, except the other way around. I didn't leave the GOP, the GOP left me. I just hope they are the vocal minority in our party, but I have my doubts with news like this and everything else that has happened this election.", '>>{IsmaelGoldbergStein} : >out of safe space > r/politics What?', ">>{PeterCornswalled} : He needs to learn worshiping Satan is evil. This may be the start of the path that leads him to salvation in Christ. Spare the rod and you soil the child. The Devil must be beaten from him if there's no other way.", '>>{viperabyss} : As someone who just moved to NC (Cary, no less) from CA, I wonder if people would attempt to block me from voting at the voting booth.', ">>{JamisonP} : Haven't seen any Republicans show up at a democratic rivals rally and shut it down and intimidate act aggressively towards the supporters there. Democrats on the other hand, they do that consistently. Very brown shirty.", '>>{1LT_Obvious} : Hate of Trump is all over Reddit, love of him is like 95% contained within r/The_Donald and a handful of other alt-right safe spaces.', ">>{neonerz} : And doesn't it have one of the best school systems in the US? Very surprising to see this was in Cary. I guess I chose to move to the right side of Raleigh.", ">>{DrunkenEffigy} : Never mind that search that username on google you get https://web.archive.org/web/20161014145609/http://petercornswalled.blogspot.com/?view=timeslide I'm legit terrified people like this exist, to make it worse he says he has a congrigation. This guy literally believes the [Tod Akin legitimate rape defense.](https://web.archive.org/save/_embed/http://petercornswalled.blogspot.com/2012/03/the-myth-of-rape-pregnancies.html?view=magazinel)", ">>{Decon-III} : Do you see how /u/d_plorable and /u/PeterCornswalled aren't banned yet?", ">>{twinscull} : If anyone bothered to read the article there's no evidence to support this. This scumbag father is using his son to try to score political points and this has nothing to do with Trump. There's profit in being a victim these days.", ">>{AnnaTrocity} : They're all temporarily embarrassed wealthy members of the ruling class. The women, and the brown people, and the black people, and the gay people and the non-Christian people are trying to oppress them and keep them from getting what this world owes them: untold riches and 40 virgins. Their savior Donald Trump will put them back in power and make sure no one ever tries to make them face reality ever again.", '>>{IsmaelGoldbergStein} : r/politics is just as guilty. In May Clinton was the devil and Bernie was Jesus returned to this Earth. Now, Trump is LITERALLY HITLER (TM) and "Clinton" has become synonymous with nothing more than "not Trump". I think we need to look at the world with more complexity than is reflected on most of the subreddits. To say the world is black and white is the biggest pitfall the Reddit hivemind creates.', '>>{DoktorSoviet} : You are bad at this. Whatever it is you are trying to do, you are currently doing it poorly.', '>>{alienuser007} : Why am I not surprised that Hillary supporters are not aware of this kind of crap, its what happens when you live in a safe space. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3390765/Birmingham-teenager-lied-punched-wearing-hijab-Paris-massacre.html https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Fake_Anti-Muslim_Hate_Crimes_and_Other_Lies', '>>{DrunkenEffigy} : Again I would like to point out the hypocrisy of your claimed religion and the actions you are calling for. You think John Smith or Jesus would be ok with the vigilantly style beating of children. Never mind the fact I disagree with corporal punishment for other reasons, the passage you refer to is talking about discipline from the father not a mob of incensed children. Edit: fun fact "spare the rod..." does not appear in the bible the closest is “He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.” The passage you are referring to was actually written by Samuel Butler, a cheeky British poet who enjoyed mocking religious extremists and hypocrites.', '>>{Lawschoolfool} : The only difference is they have no interest in 72 virgins.', ">>{ragonk_1310} : Likewise, friend. Read article and tell me it's valid.", '>>{Meowymeow88} : There are many instances of Trump supporters being harassed and physically attacked. They are not upvoted on /r/politics because they do not fit the narrative.', '>>{andyhill420} : Well done, I hope you feel great about that outburst.', ">>{1LT_Obvious} : I don't think the world is black and white, but I've already made my decision as to which candidate is more dangerous to put into power. I still look at all mounting evidence objectively, but it is clear which candidate is digging their hole 10x as quickly. >I think we need to look at the world with more complexity than is reflected on most of the subreddits. To say the world is black and white is the biggest pitfall the Reddit hivemind creates. I don't disagree at all, but I think Trump supporters need to adhere to this advice just as much.", '>>{19djafoij02} : Trump, Daesh, and Brexit have shown how easy it is for people to be radicalized in the heartland of Western democracy. "Nice people" in places like the suburban research triangle, Long Island, "middle England", and Muslim communities in Ottawa, Provence, and Stockholm aren\'t that much less susceptible to ultranationalism and violent extremism than we\'d like to think as westerners. Western values are a treasure we must fight to defend, not something inherent in our race or culture.', '>>{NapoleonBonerparts} : You decide to discredit an entire group of people because someone lied one time? I hate to tell you, people in position of authority have lied in the past to keep the status quo. Does that mean the principal is untrustworthy? Your first argument from the article has merit, but your second argument lacks critical thinking.', '>>{Quexana} : This took place in Cary. And Cary is one of the more liberal towns in NC serving as a mostly wealthy suburb of the larger cities in the Triangle. Now imagine the shit going down in the real small towns, especially those in Eastern NC.', ">>{PenisBeautyCream} : The article says the bus driver didn't witness any altercation. Probably because school bus drivers don't give two shits about what happens on the bus and therefore tune out everything going on behind them.", '>>{zhiked} : But, he noted, they have not been able to substantiate any of Usmani\'s claims. ""At this time, the information from the investigation does not support an altercation," Chadwick said. "No students who were interviewed witnessed an altercation. The bus driver did not witness an altercation. The child did not report the bus driver any injury.""', ">>{cakebatter} : > unless there is proof, this should be taken with a grain of salt I mean the kid had cuts, scrapes, bruises, and a sprain, so there's that?", '>>{Salammar77} : As a North Carolinian. I have never seen such. However, I have never seen a line either.', ">>{cakebatter} : We need to get rid of the 2 party system and I see a great opportunity to do so rising from the burning ashes of the GOP. I'm a technically unaffiliated but I'm liberal and have always voted Dem, but I'm hoping the GOP implosion will result in the split of the Republican party into multiple smaller parties allowing the Dem party to split up a bit too.", ">>{cakebatter} : No, they don't seem to be too discriminating in the type of pussy they grab.", ">>{NapoleonBonerparts} : Now with the Donnal, Republicans are an alt right group who are extremely religious, hate women and gays. Congrats, republicans! You're the American Taliban! Just kidding, they were already that way before Trump.", '>>{IsmaelGoldbergStein} : Oh thank you for giving me a voice on a forum. I should be so grateful simpletons like me can even speak to marvelous keyboard gods such as yourself.', ">>{cakebatter} : Sure, I've seen lots of stories about protestors/rally attenders/people wearing MAGA hats getting into altercations/attacked. But I haven't seen any about school children being bullied by kids of Hillary supporters, and there are **lots** of [reports of kids of Trump supporters bullying minorities.](https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/splc_the_trump_effect.pdf)", ">>{19djafoij02} : So many people in the US are saying this. They never thought their neighbor, boss, coworker, or employee could become radicalized into believing that there's a global conspiracy against them. Muslims have known for some time that wealth and education are only so effective against a sufficiently motivated extremist group.", '>>{excitebyke} : >Now imagine the shit going down in the real small towns, especially those in Eastern NC. id prefer articles/proof, over my imagination.', '>>{cakebatter} : Well, you know, the kid had physical signs of being attacked. And the guy is *moving back to Pakistan* so it\'s tough to tell what kind of "political points" he\'s looking to score.', '>>{zhiked} : i say they HAVE, not they always do. and muslims have lied before too. lots of people lie. im just saying that that has happened before, and COULD happen again.', '>>{spacelincoln} : British tabloid and a alt right blog. Gotcha.', ">>{Goredrak} : You wouldn't know a fact if it walked up and grabbed you by the pussy.", ">>{NapoleonBonerparts} : Have these people lied about it before? Is there a relation between those people and these people? Otherwise it's completely irrelevant.", '>>{spacelincoln} : I was just impressed at the social cooperation. Plus the guy behind me that was so drunk at the beginning of the game that he face planted into the row ahead of me.', ">>{toadofsteel} : Oh its not the franchise I would be spewing hate speech against, it's their fans.", '>>{Jaggle} : Yeah, just a few 10 and 13 year olds will do, thanks', '>>{excitebyke} : thanks, see, no need for an imagination.', ">>{JamisonP} : Not sure what you mean. I can't think of a single time when Trump supporters, or even crazy tea party fanatics showed up en masse to infiltrate and protest Bernie or Hillary's rallies. I can easily point to several instances where their supporters DID do that to Trump rallies, one - Chicago - going so far as forcing Trump to cancel his rally. That's the literal definition of fascism, and it's being peddled by the left. So, don't know where you get off in supporting the claim that 'The Republicans are terrorists'.", ">>{malaislinn} : But why are they racist, what makes them racist? People aren't just born racists. If we shut the humanity of people off with one easy label, we're not doing anything much differently.", ">>{silentbobsc} : But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most, our one fellow and brother who most needed a friend yet had not a single one, the one sinner among us all who had the highest and clearest right to every Christian's daily and nightly prayers, for the plain and unassailable reason that his was the first and greatest need, he being among sinners the supremest? - Mark Twain", ">>{CleverGirlwithadd} : The bus driver said he didn't see an altercation?! To me that's more disturbing.", '>>{alienuser007} : Yep, totally ignore all the mainstream sources listed. Typical Hillary supporter, back to your safe space!', ">>{9001_Dalmatians} : Trump does. Difference being that he doesn't want to wait until the afterlife to grope them.", '>>{spacelincoln} : Yep, 2 incidents discount the several thousand incidents in the last 10 years.', ">>{d_plorable} : lol i told you we're in this bitch and you can't do anything about it except keep crying.", ">>{coned_miro} : Finally, I've always wanted to know the truths about Dinosaurs... oh wait, I'veread a textbook or two in my day ------------------------------------- I voted early in Virginia for Hillary! REMEMBER TO VOTE AND DO YOUR PART! [Find out how!](https://g.co/kgs/zr3iTl)", ">>{BooG690} : Why does everyone go crazy when one innocent person is wrongfully imprisoned but it's okay to wrongfully accuse an innocent bystander of committing a hate crime?"], ['>>{xoFoxtail} : How do you carry your iPhone 6/s +?', '>>{Fender6969} : Front pockets work fine for me. Are you planning on putting a case on your device?', '>>{Sceme} : Have an Android phone thats slightly bigger and it has fit into every front pocket I have put it in.', ">>{Fender6969} : I used to use the Apple silicone case but I'm now using it with no case. For both scenarios it fit just fine. It was a perfect fit with no case.", '>>{annaheim} : Back pocket. I work in a cafe so I deal with lots of liquid and syrups and the last thing I want to have is water/dark chocolate in the ear speaker.', '>>{prHat317} : Put in pocket when moving and take out when sitting down', '>>{VivaSativaz} : front pockets work just fine for me, I wear skinny jeans btw', '>>{GuavaMyPickle} : Just go old school and wear it in your front pockets. Simply buy jeans with bigger pockets for phones like the + iterations of the iPhone.', '>>{DAEFlair} : Are you really going to buy a vest to hold a fucking phone? And then have to wear it all the time so you can carry a phone? Dude wtf', '>>{allsortsashit} : We should bring the baggie jean look back again just for our devices. That was a comfy time.', ">>{chazysciota} : I'm gonna go against the tide here and say pants pockets work great. That said, you should probably waste your money on that awful jacket.", ">>{xoFoxtail} : No, probably not. Looking over the stuff on that site, it seems a bit overkill for me. Though, I'd rather wear something like that than have my phone in a belt holster or something.", ">>{xoFoxtail} : That's really all I wear too. The problem with women's jeans is they make the pockets so small on them, at least everywhere I shop. Maybe I can find something a little bigger at Walmart, hate shopping there though.", '>>{lensgrabber} : Kuhl pants, side pockets, 6+ w/ case fits perfect', ">>{myballsareitchy} : Back pocket. I don't like the way it looks/feels in my front pocket.", ">>{Zvne} : I wear girl pants as a guy (guy pants aren't tight enough) so I feel your pain on this a bit. My front pockets are tiny or sometimes fake. I've been using my back right pocket forever and it works pretty well.", ">>{TristinPerry} : If you're a woman, a small bag along with your other stuff would work well. But if you're a man, then most pants will work fine. 1/8 of my pants don't fit the 6S+ entirely but all of my other pants and shorts can hold it very comfortably   Edit: I totally missed the part about you not liking bags. My girlfriend just carries her phone in her hands or in a little wristlet since most if not all of her pants can't fit her 6. I know you said you don't like bags but [Coach](http://www.coach.com/shop/women-wristlets?t1Id=5000000000000013510&t2Id=5000000000000013510&t3Id=5000000000000013513&spu=0&cid=S_G193525) has small wristlets that can carry a phone as well. I wouldn't shell out the money on a vest just to carry your phone.", '>>{3y3-000} : Really? After a long day of carrying around my plus phone it tends to leave marks on my slim fit jeans :/', ">>{VivaSativaz} : Happens to me too sometimes with certain pants, it doesn't really bother me though :)", '>>{wekiva} : I have a 6+ and carry it in the pocket of my tee shirts-case and all. I simply will not buy tee shirts without a pocket. I suggest the more robust tee shirts for less sag, Carhart tee shirts are one brand I like.', ">>{MinisterforFun} : Thing is, when I had the 4 and the 5, I always had a bag with me. I always carried a sling bag with me so when i got the bigger phone, there wasn't any change to my usage as I'd always been placing my phone inside.", ">>{Techsupportvictim} : Have you thought about a belt bag. I don't mean one of those 80s fanny pack gigs but something slicker looking. They have been quite the rage with folks that don't want to carry a back pack or purse.", ">>{xoFoxtail} : I haven't. But, since you mentioned it, I thought I'd see what they are. [This](https://www.etsy.com/listing/224500524/belt-bag-black-leather-flat-bum-bag-hip?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=shopping_us_a-bags_and_purses-fanny_packs&utm_custom1=a5e60367-fabd-47bf-8581-d6463e9b0de7&gclid=CISR9pKAlM0CFQUFaQod9fUK7Q) and [this](http://www.nastygal.com/accessories/nila-anthony-im-a-suede-4-u-belt-bag?currency_code=US&country_code=US&gdffi=95a32e235beb40efb4f6ae9f6aa9b3c1&gdfms=84B940B9F63E42A5AEBAC5580D6CA34D&gclid=COqp966AlM0CFYkCaQodoeIBWQ) look really nice. I might look into them more when I get home from work. Thanks for the suggestion!", ">>{listerminty} : Pants pocket. It'll fit; it's not a laptop."], ['>>{Nicheslovespecies} : For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : Trump embodies the last gasps of a dying demographic--one that, for the good of the country, can't die off soon enough.", ">>{BlackTea14} : There is a critical distinction that should be drawn: it's not the *demographic* that's the issue, it's the worldview Trump's supporters subscribe to.", ">>{moxy801} : I wish I remember the exact quote, but there is one that goes sort of like this: A privileged group experiences any loss of that privilege as 'oppression'.", '>>{BalanceCoil} : Yeah look more race baiting the Democrat go to. Fuck off NYT', '>>{KKK4Trump} : She learned long ago never to be alone with her father!!!!', '>>{WaltBush} : I think it went: "If you take power or things away from people, they get pissed."', '>>{1ceyou} : Here we go again, another media outlet perpetrating identity politics. Blacks vs Whites Mexican vs Whites Poor vs Whites Gays vs Whites and you wonder why there is so much violence, such as in Dallas where you have BLM shooter wanting to shoot "white cops" or you have protestors throwing rocks at Trump supporters " http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-trump-anaheim-security-20160525-snap-story.html"', '>>{trevize1138} : Another post poised to get people talking about Trump and racism! If you aren\'t yet aware, you must drink when you see the following: * "Give me one example of Trump being racist" * "That\'s not racist it\'s bigoted" * [copy+pasted dictionary definition of racism] * [mental gymnastics here] "therefore *leftists* are the racist ones!" * "SJW" If you see the following you must chug! * "Curiel blah blah blah La Raza blah blah \'the race\' in Spanish!"', '>>{0ne_Word} : I was a rare "poor white" when I was a kid. It was tough.', ">>{drew418} : I'll give you another one: >The hatred that men bear to privilege increases in proportion as privileges become fewer and less considerable, so that democratic passions would seem to burn most fiercely just when they have least fuel. I have already given the reason for this phenomenon. When all conditions are unequal, no inequality is so great as to offend the eye, whereas the slightest dissimilarity is odious in the midst of general uniformity; the more complete this uniformity is, the more insupportable the sight of such a difference becomes.", '>>{Astalano} : I think this is legitimate hate speech and just straight up racism. You should be straight up banned for this comment if the mods have any sense.', '>>{therealhood} : Wow is that a trump quote..... lmfao..... can you image any worthwhile quote from this guy', '>>{therealhood} : Saying shit like that is why you live a lonely life and no one really likes you....', '>>{therealhood} : But you had privileges..... cause I grew up poor and white and basically everything was easy', '>>{BannedbytheKlan} : Alexis de Tocqueville\'s 1840 book "Democracy in America" is the source of that quote.', '>>{43218} : Shouldnt you at least wait till the dead cops are buried to start your race baiting anew?', '>>{bitfriend} : The whole notion that "whites are a dying demographic" (when the term *white* itself is mostly made up) is what fuels the GOP. Lending this *false* theory credence makes them stronger. Regardless, 70% (if not more) of the country is white. They make up a majority. Not promoting their interests means loosing elections. Even Obama understood this in 2008: which is why he went out of his way to get friendly with the (overwhelmingly white) Unions so he could get swing states. As white majority areas experience brain drain to blue cities (especially LA, Chicago, NYC), they\'ll become much redder. This is a huge problem given that the net movement isn\'t enough to effect congressional apportionment. Which means an overall redder government. This is why Congress is entirely GOP run now. The Presidency is the last place blue cities are hanging on to, and only because of a handful of swing states.', '>>{madleon1} : Go live in Africa and let us know how that works out for you.', '>>{cam94509} : It\'s an interesting quote, but I\'m not 100% sure I follow it\'s relevance. It seems to me that this just says we\'re particularly good at recognizing inequality as it gets slighter, which actually makes such notions as "reverse racism" nonsense, because we\'d notice that slight difference extremely strongly no matter which direction it goes.', ">>{trevize1138} : > bittet ...hilaary I see you're playing the game, too.", '>>{thisisATHENS} : Where does this racist hate come from? It is so odd.', '>>{therealhood} : It was a joke... trump would have trouble reading that quote', ">>{Benthetraveler} : Yeah but I really didn't plan on dying due to alcohol poisoning today.", '>>{therealhood} : No, there is no white privilege there is financial privilege .... its always been that way', ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : Oh, I follow what you are saying. We are on the same page. It's cool.", ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : Yeah, accept that's not what you or other racists in this thread are saying. You are saying white people, not Trump Supporters.", ">>{therealhood} : OJ was black..... and rich..... what do you think shielded MJ from pediphile charges.... that's right dolla dolla bill.. same thing that shielded wall street bankers....etc etc.", ">>{BlackTea14} : I think it's pretty obvious that I'm talking about Trump supporter's worldview (see my last comment) so spare me the white victim complex routine.", ">>{BlackTea14} : How so? If you've developed a victim complex centered around your racial identity, you've got a white victim complex.", ">>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : Hush little racist don't you cry, every one is equal in the laws eyes. If you think that you are special. You are racist, you little rectum.", '>>{BlackTea14} : Do you even know what you mean by your own words?', '>>{NoBreaksTrumpTrain} : I\'m messing with you man, calm down. Seriously though dude y\'all say "Trump people" it sounds like a dog whistle for white people I don\'t like.', '>>{trevize1138} : OMG! The little known "2X Race Bait" rule! CHUG! CHUG! CHUG!', ">>{43218} : You're gonna love president trump. Keep shooting cops. .. working great so far!"], [">>{amfoejaoiem} : When the author can't come up with a single reason this might be useful it's a sign that they're struggling to create a piece people will click on. Here's a hint: no headphone jack = more space inside the phone for other stuff.", '>>{iamsorri} : IMO I think "Airpods" is a great idea. Just think, why do you need the cable from ear to the phone? It breaks, gets tangled, uncomfortable to use while running, working out and so forth. I am not saying this is a ground breaking changes but I think it is for the better. There is a whole reason why bluetooth headphones exist for a reason because people want them. My only questions with the "Airpods" is that how much will the replacement cost? you know we lose them all the time.', ">>{Squircle_MFT} : What a crappy article, I don't like apple, but this article is shit. he blames the tech industry, but all he talks about is Apple, no wonder Yahoo was going under...", '>>{Je-Suis-Tobi} : Battery, storage, RAM, motherboard, chips and sensors, better DAC, the list goes on and on honestly', '>>{gooduser_name} : > Just think, why do you need the cable from ear to the phone? It breaks, gets tangled, uncomfortable to use while running, working out and so forth. I am not saying this is a ground breaking changes but I think it is for the better. Limiting options is never *for the better*. You don\'t need to remove headphone jack to introduce Airpods. >My only questions with the "Airpods" is that how much will the replacement cost? you know we lose them all the time. $159 only...', '>>{Recklesslettuce} : Yahoo has been going under ever since the twin towers collapsed.', '>>{l3lC} : Or you could just make it a fraction of a millimeter larger and give us both. Heck, make it the thickness of the iPhone 5 again.', ">>{NotARobotSpider} : They had to do this for improved waterproofing. It's not that huge a deal. Large parts of these negative articles were pre-written before the announcement expecting to ride a tidal wave of negavitity to click-heaven.", ">>{aredfred} : If people don't like the lack of a headphone jack then they should just but a different phone. There are hundreds of options that include one.", ">>{iamreeterskeeter} : This is absolute bullshit. You can waterproof an audio jack. It is simply a way to force customers into buying more expensive garbage. Why haven't I bought bluetooth earbuds? Because I know I will lose one and I also don't want to deal with charging the damn things. I have enough trouble keeping my phone charged.", ">>{TubaKid44} : I heard they removed the DAC since it's all digital until is outside the phone. Did they end up including one anyway?", '>>{gooduser_name} : and tim cook definitely told you that they had to remove it for water proofing instead of that courage bullshit they said on stage. You clearly are not talking out of your ass...', '>>{HarlanCedeno} : Have they been able to demonstrate any tangible benefit of the "other stuff" that they couldn\'t provide on previous models?', ">>{TubaKid44} : Author forgot a fourth option. Buy an Android where nothing is proprietary. He should know by now that all of Apple's decisions are made based on what they can do to force people to stay within their ecosystem. It's only going to get worse. I recommend jumping off of the granny smith train while you still can.", ">>{gooduser_name} : > Which isn't actually a bad deal for Bluetooth headphones If you take $29 headphones and make them wireless with a crappy DAC, then sold them for $159, it is...", '>>{HarlanCedeno} : Author makes some good points. Has Apple been able to demonstrate any benefit for the user from removing the headphone jack?', ">>{gooduser_name} : There's no DAC in the phone. A crappy version of DAC will be in BOTH earbuds...", '>>{iamsorri} : bro you didn\'t even answer my questions. what are you talking about? we are not talking about limiting someone\'s rights or freedoms. we are talking about a piece of product. so when the first iphone or smartphones came out did you say keyboard should be part of cellphone because "limiting options is never for the better"?', '>>{amfoejaoiem} : Battery, Processor, improved reliability. Literally any component in the phone could be made bigger or more reliable with more space.', ">>{amfoejaoiem} : This is a product design decision and everything has tradeoffs. Yes, 1/4 mm makes a difference. Everything makes a difference. They're going to sell 100 M of these things, for almost $1000 a piece, it's really important to think about the details. The executives at Apple get paid shitloads of money to agonize over every detail. They think about the size of peoples's hands, the extra 30 minutes of battery life they might get you. Getting rid of this has cons, as does every product design decision, but it also has pros, and the fact that the article didn't even touch on them shows what a biased attack piece it was. Have you ever worked in product development?", ">>{amfoejaoiem} : No, they don't do demonstrations of stuff like that because putting together a demo for something so obvious would be asinine. More space inside of a phone = better battery, processor, camera. Literally every component in the phone could be made better if it had more room.", '>>{reddit-account7} : But they made it thinner so there is less space', '>>{Je-Suis-Tobi} : Not so. There needs to be a DAC for the internal speaker to work, and it will be what powers speakers when using the lightning to 3.5mm adapter.', '>>{Je-Suis-Tobi} : I\'m not trying to defend Apple, personally I think that people just waste their money on iPhones when they aren\'t that great, and they always end up getting screwed over in the end, however I think that if you had a phone the thickness of the iPhone 5 and a 5.5" screen it would be a bit much'], ['>>{Yolo20152016} : While media obsessed over Khan, look what Trump did for these Gold Star families...', ">>{conanthecnidarian} : >But isn’t it curious that while the media obsessed over one Gold Star family’s “interaction” with Donald Trump, they’ve all but ignored another one. Yes, while we were all hearing day and night about Khizr Khan last week, the Republican presidential nominee was quietly meeting with 10 Gold Star families privately. >No TV cameras, no script, no agenda. Uh, I'm pretty sure the agenda was to try to rehabilitate his image after he spent a week attacking the parents of a fallen soldier over their religion. What did he do for gold star families before he attacked the Kahn family. I don't care what he did after he was called out for being out of line. Everything he did after was just him groveling to pay for a boneheaded decision he made again and again over the course of a week.", ">>{miashaee} : He did this stuff after people called him out for the insult to the khans. He doesn't care about the military or their families, other wise he wouldn't have insulted POWs or a gold star family to begin with.", '>>{NYCSCV} : This has to be the worst presidential campaign in modern history. Forced to pay lip service to families of veterans because he insulted one prior to this.', '>>{OZY1} : Correction: "While *Trump* obsessed over Khan..."', ">>{Yolo20152016} : Nope not at all http://www.nytimes.com/1995/11/10/nyregion/veterans-day-parade-tries-for-a-comeback.html You know who doesn't care about vets Hillary Clinton, she leaves her own people out to die. The Kahn's are a political pawn and they know it. John McCain is hated by many vets for fucking them over and rumored to have given up vital to the North, he was heard daily on a loud speaker promoting the North and there are recordings of it.", ">>{miashaee} : Well then they both don't care about our military, what's your point? After that POW comment I lost a ton of respect for Trump.......also the neo-nazi retweet against black people......and the discriminatory no Muslims allowed temporary ban suggestion.......and how he just joked about Hillary being shot.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : He didn't joke about her being shot, come on he was making reference to the fact that the 2nd Amendment is a right to bear arms and it is unconstitutional right to restrict. She her self said “And here again, the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment. And I am going to make that case every chance I get.” So we as voters need to remember that she will try to take away those rights. If she is elected we have the right to fight such laws. Take it how you want to. What NEo-Nazi tweet about black people? ISIS said they would use refugees to attack us, so why is that such an issue. The current administration isn't doing anything about ISIS to solve the problem to then allow people in once ISIS is taken care of. You people are so sensitive.", '>>{miashaee} : He talked about how President Hillary would be picking Supreme Court justices and there is nothing anyone could do to stop her..........save maybe the second amendment people. Sounds at BEST like a sloppy call for unity and at WORST like someone could shoot Hillary (or one of her nominees) to stop her. That was NOT smart, more self-inflicted wounds for Donald.........how is it that he is SOOOO horrible at this?', '>>{Yolo20152016} : Well she did say she the Supreme Court was wrong she was going to do something about it. freebeacon.com/politics/leaked-audio-clinton-says-supreme-court-is-wrong-on-second-amendment/', ">>{miashaee} : Who gives a crap when compared to Donald and his dumpster fire campaign. He is literally the worst candidate that I have ever seen for president, never thought I'd be happy to be voting for Hillary Clinton......wow.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : It does matter Trump isn't going after anyone's constitutional rights, with the possible exception of anchor babies. She is going to destroy the 2nd amendment. He is proving the media's false narratives, because he never said to shoot anybody", '>>{miashaee} : Well he should have said that instead of what might have been a "hey maybe someone could shoot her" comment. Man this guy has no idea what he is doing, I can\'t believe the GOP nominated him, did they actually think that this stuff would fly in the general election when people started to pay attention? Lol', ">>{Yolo20152016} : He is brash and people aren't like that anymore, honestly his voters could careless about GOPers bitching about him. They stopped representing us a long time ago and I am happy we are flushing them out. Really there is no two party system anymore it's a one party system that acts like you have opinions.", '>>{miashaee} : Yeah but everyone else will cause him to lose in a MASSIVE fashion, this is hillarious honestly. Is the GOP base really this out of touch with the rest of America? If so they need to get out more. Lol', '>>{Yolo20152016} : They said that about the primaries too and he beat 16 others by a more votes than all of them combined. Classic liberals and quietly supporting him and so are libertarians. He is brash but his policies are clear and direct, he is not a politician and he is not double talking us.', ">>{miashaee} : They said that when he was up in the polls in the primary (which was wrong) that and it was the GOP primary so not many minorities. The general election is a COMPLETELY different ball game especially for the GOP. This is going to be a slaughter and if you don't see why then that might explain why your side (if you're a Trump supporter) will lose.", '>>{Yolo20152016} : He has the support but they have trouble supporting him because they get attacked by those who do not have an opened mind https://youtu.be/r9hXx6_Fzgs Great video that explains what the black voters are experiencing Hillary wants to go to war https://youtu.be/-Ivt2NmbyGg', ">>{miashaee} : I'm black, I don't buy that, may experience has been that black people HATE Trump, it's the one group that is universally against him (for the most part). I mean if you look at the favorability ratings like 94% of black people have an unfavorable view of Trump and in some polls he gets 0% support from black voters in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Funny thing is I picked that Trump would win the primary for the GOP about a year ago, mostly because of ethnic and religious resentments......and the polls. I said Trump will win the GOP, Hillary would win the DNC, and Hillary would beat Trump. It was an easy call based on a variety of factors.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : I mean, I can't comment on your experience but I agree that seems to be the case. But in all honesty I hate that it is even looked at that way. We are all Americans and I want my neighbors to have the same opportunities that I do and have the same ability to work hard and be successful. I don't care about race or color, I want everyone to have a chance at the American Dream and I want share my yard and have bbq's with them. There is too much division and deception by the media and they paint someone like me as a racist and bigot. However, I have an amazing job working with inner city youths with psychological disorders. I was an administrator but I broke up fight and ended up falling 5 feet off an embankment on my head, I suffered a TBI and chose to step down. I chose to work direct care with them, because I didn't want to get out of the field and I actually enjoy it more. These kids keep me going and despite the TBI issues. I just want a better for them and everyone else, regardless if they like me or not.", '>>{miashaee} : Dude, Trump retweeted a neo-nazi propaganda post against black people with stereotypical racist imagery, you don\'t get to say "we\'re all Americans" after that.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : The NEO-Nazi sherif star? That originated from a NEO-Nazi Twitter account but it was being used throughout the Internet before he used it on his Tweet. I believe I saw it on the_donald or Facebook right before he tweeted it. Unless you knew that it came directly from a NEO-Nazi page you wouldn't see the issue. I admit there are some bad apples that like that probably follow such nazis and that's how it got spread. But it's two way street. The KKK is still a democrat based organization. The Nazi's were. A Socialist party. There is evil all around us , but there are also good people too.", '>>{miashaee} : Nooooo, I was referring to the post with a black "thug" holding a gun surrounded with false murder stats that said black people are responsible for 81% of white murders from a made up statistics institute that Trump retweeted from a neo-nazi. Yeah that\'s what I am talking about, not the other times he retweetd a neo-nazi. Like I said you don\'t get to pretend that race doesn\'t matter to you after you do some stuff like that, and as far as I am concerned Trump has EARNED his disdain from the black community. He has no basis to complain if not a single black person votes for him and it costs him Ohio and Pennslvania (which based on the demographic makeup of those states that would be the difference).', ">>{Yolo20152016} : m.motherjones.com/mojo/2015/11/most-fascinating-thing-about-donald-trumps-racist-tweet If it is any consolation extremely liberal mother jones explained the situation. An apology would have been good but I guess the pole numbers went up. dailycaller.com/2015/06/20/flashback-as-governor-bill-clinton-honored-confederacy-on-arkansas-flag/ I personally just see Hillary as a racist wolf in Sheeps clothing her past is riddled with segregation and questions from her mentor KKK Robert Byrd to Bill's honoring of the confederate flag (then denouncing it), the white only golf course. The laws that her and Bill pushed through that targets black people and then gives mandatory sentencing to low level drug offenses. Why does someone with crack get like 10 more years of sentencing than cocaine? Spending 50 years in jail for pot? Then she helped craft and create a law that takes children out of the home and puts them in foster care and it made it that much easier to terminate parent rights. She has single handily destroyed hundreds of thousands of families through the mandatory sentencing and child removal laws. Trump isn't an angel and he has his questions but this woman has played a hand in placing 673,000 American citizens in prison and pushed laws that have ripped thousands of children from their homes and families. I see her and Bill's impact everyday. Those are just my reasons and I respect yours.", '>>{miashaee} : That doesn\'t change anything about what I said about Trump, he doesn\'t get to play the "race doesn\'t matter" card anymore. That being said I do have issues with Hillary, they just aren\'t as big......that and I don\'t think she might be crazy.', ">>{Yolo20152016} : I see your point with that, it should have never been posted and I can see why others feel that way too. That being said, I know that Trump or Hillary for that matter isn't going to wave a magic wand and puff everything is fixed. It is going to take work, and the best way to fix social issues is jobs. It is up to us to fix the cracks in our society. But it is easier when people have a way to earn a good living and not resent the other for what they have. For our sake I hope that one of them can do that, I just don't see how Hillary's plan is any different than what we have seen the last 40 years.", ">>{miashaee} : No one can, this is an infrastrcual issue. Neither can fix this and if people think either can then they are fools. You're best bet is to be in the haves group, that's what I worked hard to get into for about 20 years......good luck to you man."]]

classify and reply

[">>{NoAvailableNicks} : Encrypt/Wipe text messages so that Ex can't read them?", ">>{TrumpIsAntiAmerican} : Nope, we'll never accept Trump as President. He's a shit smear.", '>>{dirtyfries} : They also happen to be the lowest turnout group - so it matters little either way.', ">>{archeominus} : She doesn't need much help with Trump at the top of the GOP ticket.", '>>{wonderingwhether54} : he will *still* be not my president.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Of course he will be the President, but he will be thought of the same way Republicans who took images of Obama to shoot at gun ranges thought of the man. They don't like him, they don't view him as legitimate, they think he's a dictator, that he's incompetent.", ">>{david_2017} : Trump's Black History Month speech a 'dire forecast' for black community", ">>{Da-Aaron} : Just go Settings > General > Reset > Erase All Contents and Settings That erases everything to factory new. Apple doesn't have the ability to intercept or retrieve iMessages. They don't store them on their servers. They are encrypted until they reach the iPhone. Even law enforcement with a court order can't get to iMessages.", '>>{rush42} : So......what should he have done instead??', ">>{tdsteve} : If the husband's iCloud account is currently logged in on the phone, then yes, he may be able to see iMessage conversations. Are these conversations using iMessage or MMS? MMS is not synced by iCloud AFAIK, but if the husband owns the cellular plan that the phone is operating on, then he may be able to access them through their carrier. Also, I am by no means qualified to give legal advice, but I would think that text messaging is not the most secure or private way to communicate with a lawyer.", '>>{cripplegimp} : But it also an important demographic to win the Presidency and she has the charisma of a dead fish.', ">>{dirtyfries} : It's useful, but not important - Presidential elections are rarely, if ever, decided by the youth since they're so horribly unreliable and come out in such low numbers. I hate to say it, but old people is where it's at. They're consistent and reliable. My guess, for this election is that it's the Latino vote that'll make a big difference.", '>>{Neveronlyadream131} : Twitter forbids threats. But it isn’t stopping every anti-Semitic Trump fan.', ">>{justanidiotloser} : His endorsement at this point won't do anything but discredit him and hurt his movement.", ">>{uhuhuhu} : Why are posting on /r/politics then if you aren't even an american citizen?", '>>{DebussySIMiami} : Trump fans are tough on the internet but melt like butter when confronted in real life.', ">>{tdsteve} : I think the concern was that the husband may be able to access them through iCloud, but factory resetting the phone and giving the son his own iCloud account would be a good solution, as long as he doesn't give him the password to his iCloud.", ">>{Da-Aaron} : That's something I hadn't even considered. If he had a copy of the iCloud backup though, he wouldn't want the phone itself so bad. If she does end up erasing it and lets her son take it there, she should check the iCloud settings to make sure he doesn't sign into his iCloud and set it to backup there.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : You're generalizing half the country now? Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics?", ">>{whosfunny} : You don't have to accept it, just like they didn't with Obama.", ">>{BestPoliticalPundit} : This is why Clinton should not cave to Sanders's platform. She should tell him to drop the fuck out. She should tell his supporters that they can either fall in line or fuck off.", ">>{NoAvailableNicks} : Not sure, I'll ask her. I agree with you about communicating with her lawyer via text messages, but what's done is done. She has a new phone to use that she bought herself, it's just the old one that my nephew is currently using. One other thing, is there a way to securely remove the text messages without a factory reset? My nephew really only uses the phone to play Pokemon Go and he would probably be upset if all his stuff was deleted.", '>>{IGotEm} : Pokemon Go is an app that uses a login and password to obtain our data. None will be lost by deleting the app itself because he can just login again once it re-downloaded after wipe.', '>>{quacking_quackeroo} : This year im grateful for how much money my pals and i will scam the american taxpayer for in the next four years. Im gonna make a killing from your hard work. Thank you all.', ">>{mo_reece} : Muslim and terrorist feels redundant the only difference is it's okay when you say it", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : What I noticed about the video is they disabled comments and there was no like/dislike bar. I didn't even bother listen to that disgusting human being. He's trash and should be looked at and treated as such.", '>>{cripplegimp} : Well when Sanders was talking about the "youth" vote it covers ages 45-18 so that is a significant gap of voters. I know it talks about the millennials but I think his supporters age group goes beyond millennials. I agree with you that the Latino vote will be very lopsided towards the Democrats.', ">>{d15ko} : I've never seen a user able to access their SMS/MMS via Verizon. Even if they are the account owner. I have seen lawyers subpoena Verizon to get SMS/MMS.", '>>{schzap} : Saying nothing would have been better. Just keeping his thoughts to himself.', ">>{rush42} : He didn't say that. He said Douglass would be talked about more and more. You can talk about someone who lived in the past, last time I checked.", ">>{preposte} : Wait, isn't that what they've essentially been saying for over a year now?", ">>{billthomson} : It's time for the country to heal from the damage that I have done to it.", ">>{AgentOfSPYRAL} : >I am very proud now that we have a museum on the National Mall where people can learn about Reverend King, so many other things, Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice. Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, and millions more black Americans who made America what it is today. Big impact.” It just sounds like shallow namedropping, like he hasn't already been recognized.", '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Republicans had a golden opportunity this year but the base went full retard. If they had nominated Paul Ryan, he would win easily I think.', '>>{SilvarusLupus} : I could see no comments because the youtube comment section is a shithole. But no like/dislike bar is just being a coward.', '>>{Felador} : To be fair, the candidate that can actually change that has pretty immense power.', '>>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : >Well when Sanders was talking about the "youth" vote it covers ages 45-18 so that is a significant gap of voters. That may be true, but I have a feeling that within that demographic, the probability that one will vote for Clinton despite having initially voted for Sanders is positively correlated with age.', ">>{theplott} : Except the young voters turned out in record numbers for Obama and Bernie, so guess they can be motivated to vote. Any group can be, individually, called low turnout voters since so few people in general vote in the USA. But I don't remember anyone calling out the Southern Baptists for their low turnout in support of Mitt Romney and using that as a historical trend.", '>>{NoAvailableNicks} : I think they have AT&T, does that make a difference?', '>>{Malaix} : These friendly unite the country messages amount to lipstick on a pig. Hes trying to lull Americans into cooperation while pulling shit in the background. Hes gonna act like your best friend while he guts vital government institutions like public education and the EPA and appoints the craziest fringe elements of the GOP to office.', '>>{Izor28} : This is no different than how these same people reacted to Bush. When Obama got elected they were sure the KKK would start rioting and assassinate him, but the only civil unrest has really been the work of liberal groups like Black Lives Matter. I think the difference is that the MSM is lying so badly that these people are controlled totally by fear of a Trump presidency. If I took the failing NY Times and CNN seriously I would have to share this opinion I think. I mean honestly listen to that video and what he has to say and compare it to the vitriol here. You cant tell me a normal, rational human being responds this way without being extremely scared and nervous. Or hateful perhaps', '>>{ItsDarts} : If her phone has autobackup to iCloud on, all the husband needs to do is buy a cheap older model iPhone (used?) and restore from the cloud to access any info she had previously stored. She needs to wipe her phone and wipe the iCloud backup. When I get a new phone, I always restore from backup from my last phone and all text messages with pictures even, get transferred. Then I wipe my old phone after verifying everything has transferred. Wiping (complete reset to factory) lets me sell the phone. As long as she can access the iCloud account, if all this is too confusing for her, have her take the phone to the Apple Store and ask them to wipe the iCloud account.', '>>{BrellK} : Practically anything else I suppose. Saying one sentence about MLK and then the next 10 talking about a bust of him in the White House and how CNN falsely reported it was gone and then about how they are a fake news organization seems like *really* bad taste.', ">>{madusldasl} : I was laughing into my bowl of cornflakes when I watched that. I could not believe he took it that far in that scenario. Everyone in the room was laughing, and he thought they were laughing because he's so clever. It was just unbelievable to watch. What a freaking moron.", '>>{kiddestructo} : Maybe found out who Frederick Douglass actually was, and spoke about his contributions.', ">>{john1g} : Republicans didn't riot in the streets when Obama was elected.", '>>{nrhyne} : If your phone in question is being backed up to an apple iCloud, laptop or network appliance then yes you can read all messages on the phone for as long as there has been backups. I work as a digital forensics examiner and messages CANNOT BE DELETED. Let me explain ELI5 iOS uses a fancy spreadsheet where it keeps application data. This spreadsheet contains the content of the messages, and the "metadata" or data about the data. Like time sent, received, whom sent the message etc. It also contains links to the photos and other data sent in message. Now once the message is on the phone and placed in the sheet, it will stay there until it is "marked" deleted. It doesent go anywhere. It\'s not removed in any way. This message just gets "hidden" from the users view. Now when you send and receive more messages these "hidden" messages can be overwritten by new messages. But here\'s the rub. I\'ve seen messages that were marked remain on a phone for months. So they are not entirely gone. Now when you use iCloud or backup your device. These messages get stored in your backup as a single file. Every time iCloud backs up your data it saves even the marked items to the messages file. I can easily download all your messages from your iCloud account with 29$ software, and "decode" or unscramble the messages if you will to a nice pretty list you can read as if it were on the phone. With the little bubble windows and all.. The ONLY way to get rid of everything is to factory wipe the iPhone. This doesent actually delete any data it just removes the keys to the data forever. Then go to your iCloud storage then manage storage and delete all backups.. Wait there\'s more ! Now you have to find all computers ever plugged into the phone and manually secure erase every backup. I would use a program @ eraser.heidi.ie and do a 3 pass wipe with pseudo random data. But be warned. There is a file that is left behind on the phone when you do a factory wipe that tells me if and when it\'s been wiped! A good forensic examiner will find this file right away. Hope this helps. And for everyone whom wishes to pick at my explanation of how this works and if messages can be recovered. I suggest you read up on SANS.org about iPhone forensics. There are many resources for you to use to help educate yourself about the process. I was trying to simplify it as much as possible.', '>>{TrumpIsAntiAmerican} : Trump is an egomaniac, so he certainly cares.', ">>{JZcgQR2N} : No one cares what you think. At least 50 million Americans don't, but if saying it makes you feel better, so be it.", ">>{TrumpIsAntiAmerican} : At least 50 million Americans don't think at all.", ">>{TheReacher} : Make a new iCloud account, but delete the correct backup from Settings>ICloud>Storage>Manage Storage. Then back up the iPhone to a new account that he doesn't know the password to and never will. Boom, problem solved. Also, don't tell the son the password because he might be pressured into telling it to the ex.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics? I too don't think Trump should have gotten into politics. We don't need someone aggrieved at every imagined slight controlling the most powerful military.", '>>{cd411} : They better figure out how to get their people voting in every election or they\'re gonna be taking giant steps "backwards".', ">>{theplott} : Yes, she can do that, sure, and offend a large number of voters. That isn't what candidates normally like to do though.", ">>{rush42} : Yeah well...I admit he shoulda said more about ALL of them. I think this is what happens when he doesn't make a prepared speech. He's not very good at extemporaneous speaking.", ">>{drtoszi} : Aye. Endorsement or no, I'm voting against her specifically come November if she's the nominee.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Great question dodging. What I'm saying is that if you are so bothered by someone saying something about you being Jewish, or whatever else that you have write a woe is me article you probably shouldn't put yourself in the spotlight because people are going to be mean to you.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >Great question dodging. Just following your line of questioning bud. You're the one who said it, not me. >What I'm saying is that if you are so bothered by someone saying something about you ~~being Jewish~~ having small hands, or whatever else that you have write a woe is me article you probably shouldn't put yourself in the spotlight because people are going to be mean to you. I mean, you realize how easy you're making this right?", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : You're still dodging. He responded to someone saying something, he didn't write an article saying that he fears for his life.", '>>{Ezl} : Yep, what /u/Da-Aaron said is the way to go. I usually give my old phones to family and this is the step I take. They (or she) then have to set it up as a new phone, no connection to the old account whatsoever.', ">>{tanto_le_magnificent} : Two words: Voter Suppression. Doesn't matter how many people want to vote if actually voting is made difficult to do in the first place and unnecessary hurdles are placed in the way of ethnic communities, which is exactly what the GOP are currently trying to construct to wrap up the next elections.", '>>{cripplegimp} : I have a feeling- yeah I like to deal with facts. While you may be right, that is high speculation. Especially after the FBI debacle that makes her look like she is above the law.', ">>{GroundPorter} : Which boggles my mind that the democratic leadership isn't doing and organizing voter registrations NOW to prepare for the 2018/2020 elections and providing laser like focus on states with restrictive and punitive voter suppression laws. God damn the democrats are just horrible at this.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >You're still dodging. I point out the flaws in what you're saying and you accuse me of dodging? Whatever you need to tell yourself bud. >He responded to someone saying something, he didn't write an article saying that he fears for his life. And he didn't go on national television talking about the size of his hands or dick. Oh wait. Seriously, you're making this too easy.", '>>{ohmyreddita} : If you want to wipe your text messages on iPhone permanently without recovery, you can try iPhone text message Eraser like this: http://www.iphonedataeraser.com/resources/erase-iphone-text-messages.html', '>>{NewWeimarRepublic} : He did talk about his hands, but he didn\'t pull some bullshit that he "felt threatened and unsafe" because someone insulted him.', ">>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : Of course it's speculation. That's why I stated it as such instead of asserting it as fact. However, if you do want facts, polls show that the majority of Sanders supporters will support Clinton in November.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : So now you're admitting what I've been saying and trying to make a qualification so that you aren't completely wrong? Maybe he does feel threatened which is why he tries to be a bully on Twitter.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : No, you're talking about 2 different things. Replying to someone insulting you is not equivalent to writing article after article about how that insult made you feel scurred and confused. Also there's nothing wrong with being a bully, bullies win.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >No, you're talking about 2 different things. That would be you as you flail around haha. >Replying to someone insulting you is not equivalent to writing article after article about how that insult made you feel scurred and confused. You're cracking me up with this scared twist you're trying to throw in now haha. It's like you realized you had completely lose and thought you'd throw a Hail Mary. Listen, just because you like a candidate doesn't mean you have to be willing to throw out all reason to defend them. Get off your knees already.", '>>{Arsicle7} : Oh she absolutely should. That way when we elect Trump we can shove that in your miserable faces for the next four years. "You told us to fuck off!"', '>>{BadFengShui} : >“You read all about Dr Martin Luther King a week ago when somebody said I took the statue out of my office... MLK is most noteworthy for showing up tangentially in news about Trump. "You all remember Benjamin Franklin, right? He\'s that guy on the money in my wallet."', ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : What? You're making an equivocation between replying to an insult and writing an article about how hurt you are?", ">>{cripplegimp} : Those were taken before an FBI finding that said she was so incompetent that she got away with breaking the law multiple times. You might underestimate the political toxicity of Hillary Clinton. In all truth if she wasn't going against an orange idiot she would be in real trouble. As a Bernie supporter, I would much rather support a Looney green candidate than a habitual liar at this point.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : Here's what I responded to since you're clearly trying to ignore it: >Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics? Please, let me know how that doesn't apply to Trump and his fucking hands. Stop trying to make all these little qualifications. Be a fucking man and stand behind your words instead of flailing around and downvoting all my posts 😂😂😂", '>>{BestPoliticalPundit} : 85% of Sanders supporters would vote for Clinton. Give up.', '>>{3lfg1rl} : They are. "Dems launch \'unprecedented early\' effort to capture GOP districts" http://thehill.com/homenews/house/317513-dems-want-staff-in-20-gop-held-house-districts', ">>{Logical_Hare} : He's not good at speaking *period*. The man can barely put coherent sentences together (especially when he gets his dander up about something), and has the vocabulary of a fourth grader.", ">>{Arsicle7} : Lol, you guys and gals cling to that. It's not happening. You wanna make a mockery of this country? Let's not half ass this. I wanna see Donald Trump hosting his new realty show from the Oval Office.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Getting bothered - like getting affected emotionally. A response isn't getting bothered, if he did the equivalent what these folks are doing you'd have a point.", '>>{MessisTaxAccountant} : He fucking started ranting about his hand size and talking about his dick! How in denial can you be to think he did all that because he WASNT bothered at all by it?!', ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : By ranting about his hands and dick hahahaha. It's pretty clear that you're too biased to see reason here. You need to take a step away from politics dude", '>>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Here\'s the difference You: "you smell" Me: "no I don\'t" *brings over third person* "see? I don\'t smell" (that\'s what he did) You: you smell Me: OMG HOW THREATENING I CANT BELIEVE YOU WOULD SAY THAT I AM GOING TO WRITE AN ARTICLE TALKING ABOUT HOW YOURE SUCH A MEANIE POO (what these people are doing)', ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics? What's that again?", '>>{hillsfar} : Especially on the heels of what happened with her gross negligence and perjury in the mishandling of top secret and classified information... ["*If Mrs. Clinton were a junior foreign service officer, or a young special agent of the FBI, she\'d have been fired. She\'d have immediately lost any security clearance she had. She\'d have been prohibited from ever securing government employment again.*"](http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-hillary-clinton-emails-comey-kass-0708-20160707-column.html) Living up to one\'s ideals is very important. Sanders would be betraying his ideals - and the ideals of millions of Americans - if he endorsed Hillary Clinton.', ">>{pooponagoose} : Hahahaha no Mr. President we're laughing at you, not with you...", '>>{jc5504} : Pfft those lazy mormons never show up to vote. Goes to show why Cruz lost', ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Did I not just tell you what bothered means? It means emotionally affected, not just a basic response. See the comment I just gave to you. I see you're just being obtuse so have fun jerking yourself off.", '>>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >>Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics? Bothered: 1. take the trouble to do something. 2. (of a circumstance or event) worry, disturb, or upset (someone). He was bothered bro. Get over it.', '>>{AgoraiosBum} : Because when I decide on the president of the United States of America, my first question is: how did they archive their emails in 2009? All else is irrelevant.', '>>{NewWeimarRepublic} : If you tell me something and I respond am i bothered? Taking the trouble is now responding when someone is speaking?', ">>{begrudged} : I can't stand Trump but I can't wait to watch him destroy hillary in debates (assuming debates actually happen).", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : Ranting about your dick means you're bothered haha. God, it's like explaining to a child.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Wasn't a rant, it was a response. Yes, talking to you is like talking to a child.", ">>{Arsicle7} : It's gonna be like watching a zoo monkey throwing shit at the crowd.", ">>{shabby47} : It didn't say that outside of reddit. To most people (who were actually possible voters of hers) it said mistakes were made, nothing illegal, move on.", ">>{cripplegimp} : I used to think I was a Democrat but that hearing where you could tell the Democrats had no idea what the difference between a personal email account and an email server made me instantly an independent. I'm sure a large portion of Americans don't know the difference either so its hard to see how huge the mistake was.", ">>{kljaska} : What's a bit more important is that she took every opportunity over the last 16 months to shamelessly lie about every single detail related to her email setup. But here's something a bit more tangible if you'd like. Can you name a war, besides the War on Poverty, that Hillary **hasn't** supported in the last 25 years? Just one?", ">>{kljaska} : Yet her clown show still can't seem to ever pull away and stay there.", '>>{j0phus} : Yes. Exactly like someone who wants to represent everyone would.', ">>{AgoraiosBum} : There you go - support or antipathy to military conflict is a more important criteria! That's good. As for wars, I assume you mean wars and military conflicts that the US has actually been involved with since Bill has been president. And since she supported her husband, and supported Obama, and supported the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, I can't think of one. And if you are strongly isolationist, I'll agree that is a pretty relevant fact. Although the FBI said she didn't lie.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : It was a fucking rant haha. Edit: You know what, I'm done. I can't explain any better what a definition is. Good luck dude.", ">>{kljaska} : > And if you are strongly isolationist No, not at all, just not a Republican-minded warhawk. Let me get this straight, are you suggesting that only strong isolationists should be bothered by Clinton's hawkishness? > Although the FBI said she didn't lie. During the interrogation. In fact, Comey quite clearly said she lied multiple times when asked about the facts in relation to her public statements. There wasn't a single thing Hillary said during the course of the primary regarding that server that turned out to be true, nothing.", ">>{sscilli} : Sanders ran as a democrat and I'm pretty sure early on said he would support the democrat. I'll be disappointed but it is not surprising or out of character. At that point I'll congratulate him for fighting as hard as he did, and get to work on replacing all these corrupt assholes during the midterms. I expect him to go back into the Senate to advocate for the same issues he did all campaign, but with a lot more people watching. We may have lost the battle, but we'll win the war and Sanders deserves credit for getting this whole thing started.", ">>{cam94509} : Sanders campaigning alongside Clinton, however, might matter quite a lot. We'll see how it goes.", ">>{PantsuitNixon} : Do it again, I think it's working. I almost considered voting for Hillary just then.", ">>{Gator_Bite} : Unless Hillary is willing to fight for meaningful socio-economic reforms aimed at benefitting most Americans, she shouldn't expect to get the political support of Bernie's followers with or without his endorsement.", ">>{adamlh} : Avid supporter of sanders here. I phone banked, donated, face banked, wear the shirts, was a Hawaii delegate for him at the county and state conventions, anything I could do, I did. All that being said, if he endorses Hillary, it will do nothing at all to make me vote for Clinton, but it will make me question if my support for sanders was misplaced. His undying dedication to his causes were why I was behind him. I agree with him on ~80-90% of what he has to say. And Hillary and the dnc have made it clear that the second he's out of the way, they're going to go hard back to the right for the general election. Saying he will vote for her is one thing, but endorsing her? I lost a tremendous amount of respect for warren when she did it. She literally endorsed someone that stands for everything warren has fought against for years in her current position. I can only hope sanders doesn't give in to the pressure and stays true to his principles.", ">>{cos1ne} : **Primary voters in swing states** * Ohio: 1.9 million Republican to 1.2 million Democrat. * Florida 2.3 million R to 1.7 million D. * Virginia 1 million R to .7 million D. * Michigan 1.3 million R to 1.2 million D. * Wisconsin 1.1 million R to 1 million D. Seems like if Clinton wants to win she's going to need all the Democratic voters she can get. And even if just 15% of Sanders supporters don't vote for her she'll need to bring over almost a third of all Republican voters in swing states or she'll lose the election. Do you really want the platform Clinton will have to adopt in order to get a third of all Republican voters to her side?", ">>{FrankUnderwood2} : > are you suggesting that only strong isolationists should be bothered by Clinton's hawkishness? Well, George W. got us into one phenomenally stupid war (Iraq) and one that's dragged on longer than planned (Afghanistan). She supported Iraq, and that was a mistake, but it's one that 80% of the Senate made. Afghanistan is generally seen as necessary, if unpleasant. That's why a NATO coalition went in alongside the US. Intervening in the Balkans was meant to (and did) stop ethnic cleansing on a massive scale. Intervening in Libya did the same, although that turned into a shitshow later on. There's more nuance to these decisions than you care to admit.", '>>{Meatsim1} : Uh its been leading by massive margins for pretty much the entire race', '>>{Meatsim1} : > Well when Sanders was talking about the "youth" vote it covers ages 45-18 so that is a significant gap of voters. No reasonable pollster or statistician would put 18-45 in the same category as the \'youth vote\'', '>>{cripplegimp} : When Sanders was talking FFS read please.', '>>{Meatsim1} : Yes I saw that, but my point was that since no reasonable pollster of statistician would create that category for their data that Sanders is unreasonable to do so and his statement should probably be ignored.', '>>{cripplegimp} : This is such an odd argument... First, prior conversation wasn\'t about pollsters or how the youth vote was measured by them. The point I\'m making is that when he says he won the "youth vote" it represented people 18-45. I said this because the original context, which you probably didn\'t read, was that the youth vote isn\'t very significant in elections. I was simply defining the context of the demographic that was considered "youth" as i was making that statement to say that that group of voters is older than people think when they hear "youth". You kind of argued my point as pollsters wouldn\'t see 45 y/o as youth.', ">>{kljaska} : > There's more nuance to these decisions than you care to admit. Every one is so nuanced that Hillary someone finds herself supporting them all. In the last quarter century, there isn't a single US conflict she wasn't supportive of.", ">>{kljaska} : > She doesn't need much help with Trump at the top of the GOP ticket. Still letting TV pundits tell you what's happening in America?", '>>{Meatsim1} : Oh shit you responded to a four month old comment, your ego must have really needed a boost. Well since you need it so badly, you were right. Now the discussion is about Trump policy.', '>>{kljaska} : No, the discussion is about ripping apart the Dem Party and demanding accountability in the media. And next cycle, try not going around lying to other voters about the candidates.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{NoAvailableNicks} : Encrypt/Wipe text messages so that Ex can't read them?", ">>{Da-Aaron} : Just go Settings > General > Reset > Erase All Contents and Settings That erases everything to factory new. Apple doesn't have the ability to intercept or retrieve iMessages. They don't store them on their servers. They are encrypted until they reach the iPhone. Even law enforcement with a court order can't get to iMessages.", ">>{tdsteve} : If the husband's iCloud account is currently logged in on the phone, then yes, he may be able to see iMessage conversations. Are these conversations using iMessage or MMS? MMS is not synced by iCloud AFAIK, but if the husband owns the cellular plan that the phone is operating on, then he may be able to access them through their carrier. Also, I am by no means qualified to give legal advice, but I would think that text messaging is not the most secure or private way to communicate with a lawyer.", ">>{tdsteve} : I think the concern was that the husband may be able to access them through iCloud, but factory resetting the phone and giving the son his own iCloud account would be a good solution, as long as he doesn't give him the password to his iCloud.", ">>{Da-Aaron} : That's something I hadn't even considered. If he had a copy of the iCloud backup though, he wouldn't want the phone itself so bad. If she does end up erasing it and lets her son take it there, she should check the iCloud settings to make sure he doesn't sign into his iCloud and set it to backup there.", ">>{NoAvailableNicks} : Not sure, I'll ask her. I agree with you about communicating with her lawyer via text messages, but what's done is done. She has a new phone to use that she bought herself, it's just the old one that my nephew is currently using. One other thing, is there a way to securely remove the text messages without a factory reset? My nephew really only uses the phone to play Pokemon Go and he would probably be upset if all his stuff was deleted.", '>>{IGotEm} : Pokemon Go is an app that uses a login and password to obtain our data. None will be lost by deleting the app itself because he can just login again once it re-downloaded after wipe.', ">>{d15ko} : I've never seen a user able to access their SMS/MMS via Verizon. Even if they are the account owner. I have seen lawyers subpoena Verizon to get SMS/MMS.", '>>{NoAvailableNicks} : I think they have AT&T, does that make a difference?', '>>{ItsDarts} : If her phone has autobackup to iCloud on, all the husband needs to do is buy a cheap older model iPhone (used?) and restore from the cloud to access any info she had previously stored. She needs to wipe her phone and wipe the iCloud backup. When I get a new phone, I always restore from backup from my last phone and all text messages with pictures even, get transferred. Then I wipe my old phone after verifying everything has transferred. Wiping (complete reset to factory) lets me sell the phone. As long as she can access the iCloud account, if all this is too confusing for her, have her take the phone to the Apple Store and ask them to wipe the iCloud account.', '>>{nrhyne} : If your phone in question is being backed up to an apple iCloud, laptop or network appliance then yes you can read all messages on the phone for as long as there has been backups. I work as a digital forensics examiner and messages CANNOT BE DELETED. Let me explain ELI5 iOS uses a fancy spreadsheet where it keeps application data. This spreadsheet contains the content of the messages, and the "metadata" or data about the data. Like time sent, received, whom sent the message etc. It also contains links to the photos and other data sent in message. Now once the message is on the phone and placed in the sheet, it will stay there until it is "marked" deleted. It doesent go anywhere. It\'s not removed in any way. This message just gets "hidden" from the users view. Now when you send and receive more messages these "hidden" messages can be overwritten by new messages. But here\'s the rub. I\'ve seen messages that were marked remain on a phone for months. So they are not entirely gone. Now when you use iCloud or backup your device. These messages get stored in your backup as a single file. Every time iCloud backs up your data it saves even the marked items to the messages file. I can easily download all your messages from your iCloud account with 29$ software, and "decode" or unscramble the messages if you will to a nice pretty list you can read as if it were on the phone. With the little bubble windows and all.. The ONLY way to get rid of everything is to factory wipe the iPhone. This doesent actually delete any data it just removes the keys to the data forever. Then go to your iCloud storage then manage storage and delete all backups.. Wait there\'s more ! Now you have to find all computers ever plugged into the phone and manually secure erase every backup. I would use a program @ eraser.heidi.ie and do a 3 pass wipe with pseudo random data. But be warned. There is a file that is left behind on the phone when you do a factory wipe that tells me if and when it\'s been wiped! A good forensic examiner will find this file right away. Hope this helps. And for everyone whom wishes to pick at my explanation of how this works and if messages can be recovered. I suggest you read up on SANS.org about iPhone forensics. There are many resources for you to use to help educate yourself about the process. I was trying to simplify it as much as possible.', ">>{TheReacher} : Make a new iCloud account, but delete the correct backup from Settings>ICloud>Storage>Manage Storage. Then back up the iPhone to a new account that he doesn't know the password to and never will. Boom, problem solved. Also, don't tell the son the password because he might be pressured into telling it to the ex.", '>>{Ezl} : Yep, what /u/Da-Aaron said is the way to go. I usually give my old phones to family and this is the step I take. They (or she) then have to set it up as a new phone, no connection to the old account whatsoever.', '>>{ohmyreddita} : If you want to wipe your text messages on iPhone permanently without recovery, you can try iPhone text message Eraser like this: http://www.iphonedataeraser.com/resources/erase-iphone-text-messages.html'], ['>>{Neveronlyadream131} : Twitter forbids threats. But it isn’t stopping every anti-Semitic Trump fan.', '>>{DebussySIMiami} : Trump fans are tough on the internet but melt like butter when confronted in real life.', ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : You're generalizing half the country now? Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics?", ">>{mo_reece} : Muslim and terrorist feels redundant the only difference is it's okay when you say it", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics? I too don't think Trump should have gotten into politics. We don't need someone aggrieved at every imagined slight controlling the most powerful military.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Great question dodging. What I'm saying is that if you are so bothered by someone saying something about you being Jewish, or whatever else that you have write a woe is me article you probably shouldn't put yourself in the spotlight because people are going to be mean to you.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >Great question dodging. Just following your line of questioning bud. You're the one who said it, not me. >What I'm saying is that if you are so bothered by someone saying something about you ~~being Jewish~~ having small hands, or whatever else that you have write a woe is me article you probably shouldn't put yourself in the spotlight because people are going to be mean to you. I mean, you realize how easy you're making this right?", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : You're still dodging. He responded to someone saying something, he didn't write an article saying that he fears for his life.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >You're still dodging. I point out the flaws in what you're saying and you accuse me of dodging? Whatever you need to tell yourself bud. >He responded to someone saying something, he didn't write an article saying that he fears for his life. And he didn't go on national television talking about the size of his hands or dick. Oh wait. Seriously, you're making this too easy.", '>>{NewWeimarRepublic} : He did talk about his hands, but he didn\'t pull some bullshit that he "felt threatened and unsafe" because someone insulted him.', ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : So now you're admitting what I've been saying and trying to make a qualification so that you aren't completely wrong? Maybe he does feel threatened which is why he tries to be a bully on Twitter.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : No, you're talking about 2 different things. Replying to someone insulting you is not equivalent to writing article after article about how that insult made you feel scurred and confused. Also there's nothing wrong with being a bully, bullies win.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >No, you're talking about 2 different things. That would be you as you flail around haha. >Replying to someone insulting you is not equivalent to writing article after article about how that insult made you feel scurred and confused. You're cracking me up with this scared twist you're trying to throw in now haha. It's like you realized you had completely lose and thought you'd throw a Hail Mary. Listen, just because you like a candidate doesn't mean you have to be willing to throw out all reason to defend them. Get off your knees already.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : What? You're making an equivocation between replying to an insult and writing an article about how hurt you are?", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : Here's what I responded to since you're clearly trying to ignore it: >Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics? Please, let me know how that doesn't apply to Trump and his fucking hands. Stop trying to make all these little qualifications. Be a fucking man and stand behind your words instead of flailing around and downvoting all my posts 😂😂😂", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Getting bothered - like getting affected emotionally. A response isn't getting bothered, if he did the equivalent what these folks are doing you'd have a point.", '>>{MessisTaxAccountant} : He fucking started ranting about his hand size and talking about his dick! How in denial can you be to think he did all that because he WASNT bothered at all by it?!', ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : By ranting about his hands and dick hahahaha. It's pretty clear that you're too biased to see reason here. You need to take a step away from politics dude", '>>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Here\'s the difference You: "you smell" Me: "no I don\'t" *brings over third person* "see? I don\'t smell" (that\'s what he did) You: you smell Me: OMG HOW THREATENING I CANT BELIEVE YOU WOULD SAY THAT I AM GOING TO WRITE AN ARTICLE TALKING ABOUT HOW YOURE SUCH A MEANIE POO (what these people are doing)', ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics? What's that again?", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Did I not just tell you what bothered means? It means emotionally affected, not just a basic response. See the comment I just gave to you. I see you're just being obtuse so have fun jerking yourself off.", '>>{MessisTaxAccountant} : >>Do you really think that someone who is bothered by mean words should be getting into US politics? Bothered: 1. take the trouble to do something. 2. (of a circumstance or event) worry, disturb, or upset (someone). He was bothered bro. Get over it.', '>>{NewWeimarRepublic} : If you tell me something and I respond am i bothered? Taking the trouble is now responding when someone is speaking?', ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : Ranting about your dick means you're bothered haha. God, it's like explaining to a child.", ">>{NewWeimarRepublic} : Wasn't a rant, it was a response. Yes, talking to you is like talking to a child.", ">>{MessisTaxAccountant} : It was a fucking rant haha. Edit: You know what, I'm done. I can't explain any better what a definition is. Good luck dude."], ['>>{dirtyfries} : They also happen to be the lowest turnout group - so it matters little either way.', ">>{archeominus} : She doesn't need much help with Trump at the top of the GOP ticket.", '>>{cripplegimp} : But it also an important demographic to win the Presidency and she has the charisma of a dead fish.', ">>{dirtyfries} : It's useful, but not important - Presidential elections are rarely, if ever, decided by the youth since they're so horribly unreliable and come out in such low numbers. I hate to say it, but old people is where it's at. They're consistent and reliable. My guess, for this election is that it's the Latino vote that'll make a big difference.", ">>{justanidiotloser} : His endorsement at this point won't do anything but discredit him and hurt his movement.", ">>{BestPoliticalPundit} : This is why Clinton should not cave to Sanders's platform. She should tell him to drop the fuck out. She should tell his supporters that they can either fall in line or fuck off.", '>>{cripplegimp} : Well when Sanders was talking about the "youth" vote it covers ages 45-18 so that is a significant gap of voters. I know it talks about the millennials but I think his supporters age group goes beyond millennials. I agree with you that the Latino vote will be very lopsided towards the Democrats.', ">>{preposte} : Wait, isn't that what they've essentially been saying for over a year now?", '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Republicans had a golden opportunity this year but the base went full retard. If they had nominated Paul Ryan, he would win easily I think.', '>>{Felador} : To be fair, the candidate that can actually change that has pretty immense power.', '>>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : >Well when Sanders was talking about the "youth" vote it covers ages 45-18 so that is a significant gap of voters. That may be true, but I have a feeling that within that demographic, the probability that one will vote for Clinton despite having initially voted for Sanders is positively correlated with age.', ">>{theplott} : Except the young voters turned out in record numbers for Obama and Bernie, so guess they can be motivated to vote. Any group can be, individually, called low turnout voters since so few people in general vote in the USA. But I don't remember anyone calling out the Southern Baptists for their low turnout in support of Mitt Romney and using that as a historical trend.", ">>{theplott} : Yes, she can do that, sure, and offend a large number of voters. That isn't what candidates normally like to do though.", ">>{drtoszi} : Aye. Endorsement or no, I'm voting against her specifically come November if she's the nominee.", '>>{cripplegimp} : I have a feeling- yeah I like to deal with facts. While you may be right, that is high speculation. Especially after the FBI debacle that makes her look like she is above the law.', ">>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : Of course it's speculation. That's why I stated it as such instead of asserting it as fact. However, if you do want facts, polls show that the majority of Sanders supporters will support Clinton in November.", '>>{Arsicle7} : Oh she absolutely should. That way when we elect Trump we can shove that in your miserable faces for the next four years. "You told us to fuck off!"', ">>{cripplegimp} : Those were taken before an FBI finding that said she was so incompetent that she got away with breaking the law multiple times. You might underestimate the political toxicity of Hillary Clinton. In all truth if she wasn't going against an orange idiot she would be in real trouble. As a Bernie supporter, I would much rather support a Looney green candidate than a habitual liar at this point.", '>>{BestPoliticalPundit} : 85% of Sanders supporters would vote for Clinton. Give up.', ">>{Arsicle7} : Lol, you guys and gals cling to that. It's not happening. You wanna make a mockery of this country? Let's not half ass this. I wanna see Donald Trump hosting his new realty show from the Oval Office.", '>>{hillsfar} : Especially on the heels of what happened with her gross negligence and perjury in the mishandling of top secret and classified information... ["*If Mrs. Clinton were a junior foreign service officer, or a young special agent of the FBI, she\'d have been fired. She\'d have immediately lost any security clearance she had. She\'d have been prohibited from ever securing government employment again.*"](http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-hillary-clinton-emails-comey-kass-0708-20160707-column.html) Living up to one\'s ideals is very important. Sanders would be betraying his ideals - and the ideals of millions of Americans - if he endorsed Hillary Clinton.', '>>{jc5504} : Pfft those lazy mormons never show up to vote. Goes to show why Cruz lost', '>>{AgoraiosBum} : Because when I decide on the president of the United States of America, my first question is: how did they archive their emails in 2009? All else is irrelevant.', ">>{begrudged} : I can't stand Trump but I can't wait to watch him destroy hillary in debates (assuming debates actually happen).", ">>{Arsicle7} : It's gonna be like watching a zoo monkey throwing shit at the crowd.", ">>{shabby47} : It didn't say that outside of reddit. To most people (who were actually possible voters of hers) it said mistakes were made, nothing illegal, move on.", ">>{cripplegimp} : I used to think I was a Democrat but that hearing where you could tell the Democrats had no idea what the difference between a personal email account and an email server made me instantly an independent. I'm sure a large portion of Americans don't know the difference either so its hard to see how huge the mistake was.", ">>{kljaska} : What's a bit more important is that she took every opportunity over the last 16 months to shamelessly lie about every single detail related to her email setup. But here's something a bit more tangible if you'd like. Can you name a war, besides the War on Poverty, that Hillary **hasn't** supported in the last 25 years? Just one?", ">>{kljaska} : Yet her clown show still can't seem to ever pull away and stay there.", '>>{j0phus} : Yes. Exactly like someone who wants to represent everyone would.', ">>{AgoraiosBum} : There you go - support or antipathy to military conflict is a more important criteria! That's good. As for wars, I assume you mean wars and military conflicts that the US has actually been involved with since Bill has been president. And since she supported her husband, and supported Obama, and supported the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, I can't think of one. And if you are strongly isolationist, I'll agree that is a pretty relevant fact. Although the FBI said she didn't lie.", ">>{kljaska} : > And if you are strongly isolationist No, not at all, just not a Republican-minded warhawk. Let me get this straight, are you suggesting that only strong isolationists should be bothered by Clinton's hawkishness? > Although the FBI said she didn't lie. During the interrogation. In fact, Comey quite clearly said she lied multiple times when asked about the facts in relation to her public statements. There wasn't a single thing Hillary said during the course of the primary regarding that server that turned out to be true, nothing.", ">>{sscilli} : Sanders ran as a democrat and I'm pretty sure early on said he would support the democrat. I'll be disappointed but it is not surprising or out of character. At that point I'll congratulate him for fighting as hard as he did, and get to work on replacing all these corrupt assholes during the midterms. I expect him to go back into the Senate to advocate for the same issues he did all campaign, but with a lot more people watching. We may have lost the battle, but we'll win the war and Sanders deserves credit for getting this whole thing started.", ">>{cam94509} : Sanders campaigning alongside Clinton, however, might matter quite a lot. We'll see how it goes.", ">>{PantsuitNixon} : Do it again, I think it's working. I almost considered voting for Hillary just then.", ">>{Gator_Bite} : Unless Hillary is willing to fight for meaningful socio-economic reforms aimed at benefitting most Americans, she shouldn't expect to get the political support of Bernie's followers with or without his endorsement.", ">>{adamlh} : Avid supporter of sanders here. I phone banked, donated, face banked, wear the shirts, was a Hawaii delegate for him at the county and state conventions, anything I could do, I did. All that being said, if he endorses Hillary, it will do nothing at all to make me vote for Clinton, but it will make me question if my support for sanders was misplaced. His undying dedication to his causes were why I was behind him. I agree with him on ~80-90% of what he has to say. And Hillary and the dnc have made it clear that the second he's out of the way, they're going to go hard back to the right for the general election. Saying he will vote for her is one thing, but endorsing her? I lost a tremendous amount of respect for warren when she did it. She literally endorsed someone that stands for everything warren has fought against for years in her current position. I can only hope sanders doesn't give in to the pressure and stays true to his principles.", ">>{cos1ne} : **Primary voters in swing states** * Ohio: 1.9 million Republican to 1.2 million Democrat. * Florida 2.3 million R to 1.7 million D. * Virginia 1 million R to .7 million D. * Michigan 1.3 million R to 1.2 million D. * Wisconsin 1.1 million R to 1 million D. Seems like if Clinton wants to win she's going to need all the Democratic voters she can get. And even if just 15% of Sanders supporters don't vote for her she'll need to bring over almost a third of all Republican voters in swing states or she'll lose the election. Do you really want the platform Clinton will have to adopt in order to get a third of all Republican voters to her side?", ">>{FrankUnderwood2} : > are you suggesting that only strong isolationists should be bothered by Clinton's hawkishness? Well, George W. got us into one phenomenally stupid war (Iraq) and one that's dragged on longer than planned (Afghanistan). She supported Iraq, and that was a mistake, but it's one that 80% of the Senate made. Afghanistan is generally seen as necessary, if unpleasant. That's why a NATO coalition went in alongside the US. Intervening in the Balkans was meant to (and did) stop ethnic cleansing on a massive scale. Intervening in Libya did the same, although that turned into a shitshow later on. There's more nuance to these decisions than you care to admit.", '>>{Meatsim1} : Uh its been leading by massive margins for pretty much the entire race', '>>{Meatsim1} : > Well when Sanders was talking about the "youth" vote it covers ages 45-18 so that is a significant gap of voters. No reasonable pollster or statistician would put 18-45 in the same category as the \'youth vote\'', '>>{cripplegimp} : When Sanders was talking FFS read please.', '>>{Meatsim1} : Yes I saw that, but my point was that since no reasonable pollster of statistician would create that category for their data that Sanders is unreasonable to do so and his statement should probably be ignored.', '>>{cripplegimp} : This is such an odd argument... First, prior conversation wasn\'t about pollsters or how the youth vote was measured by them. The point I\'m making is that when he says he won the "youth vote" it represented people 18-45. I said this because the original context, which you probably didn\'t read, was that the youth vote isn\'t very significant in elections. I was simply defining the context of the demographic that was considered "youth" as i was making that statement to say that that group of voters is older than people think when they hear "youth". You kind of argued my point as pollsters wouldn\'t see 45 y/o as youth.', ">>{kljaska} : > There's more nuance to these decisions than you care to admit. Every one is so nuanced that Hillary someone finds herself supporting them all. In the last quarter century, there isn't a single US conflict she wasn't supportive of.", ">>{kljaska} : > She doesn't need much help with Trump at the top of the GOP ticket. Still letting TV pundits tell you what's happening in America?", '>>{Meatsim1} : Oh shit you responded to a four month old comment, your ego must have really needed a boost. Well since you need it so badly, you were right. Now the discussion is about Trump policy.', '>>{kljaska} : No, the discussion is about ripping apart the Dem Party and demanding accountability in the media. And next cycle, try not going around lying to other voters about the candidates.'], [">>{david_2017} : Trump's Black History Month speech a 'dire forecast' for black community", '>>{rush42} : So......what should he have done instead??', '>>{schzap} : Saying nothing would have been better. Just keeping his thoughts to himself.', ">>{rush42} : He didn't say that. He said Douglass would be talked about more and more. You can talk about someone who lived in the past, last time I checked.", ">>{AgentOfSPYRAL} : >I am very proud now that we have a museum on the National Mall where people can learn about Reverend King, so many other things, Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is getting recognized more and more, I notice. Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, and millions more black Americans who made America what it is today. Big impact.” It just sounds like shallow namedropping, like he hasn't already been recognized.", '>>{BrellK} : Practically anything else I suppose. Saying one sentence about MLK and then the next 10 talking about a bust of him in the White House and how CNN falsely reported it was gone and then about how they are a fake news organization seems like *really* bad taste.', ">>{madusldasl} : I was laughing into my bowl of cornflakes when I watched that. I could not believe he took it that far in that scenario. Everyone in the room was laughing, and he thought they were laughing because he's so clever. It was just unbelievable to watch. What a freaking moron.", '>>{kiddestructo} : Maybe found out who Frederick Douglass actually was, and spoke about his contributions.', '>>{cd411} : They better figure out how to get their people voting in every election or they\'re gonna be taking giant steps "backwards".', ">>{rush42} : Yeah well...I admit he shoulda said more about ALL of them. I think this is what happens when he doesn't make a prepared speech. He's not very good at extemporaneous speaking.", ">>{tanto_le_magnificent} : Two words: Voter Suppression. Doesn't matter how many people want to vote if actually voting is made difficult to do in the first place and unnecessary hurdles are placed in the way of ethnic communities, which is exactly what the GOP are currently trying to construct to wrap up the next elections.", ">>{GroundPorter} : Which boggles my mind that the democratic leadership isn't doing and organizing voter registrations NOW to prepare for the 2018/2020 elections and providing laser like focus on states with restrictive and punitive voter suppression laws. God damn the democrats are just horrible at this.", '>>{BadFengShui} : >“You read all about Dr Martin Luther King a week ago when somebody said I took the statue out of my office... MLK is most noteworthy for showing up tangentially in news about Trump. "You all remember Benjamin Franklin, right? He\'s that guy on the money in my wallet."', '>>{3lfg1rl} : They are. "Dems launch \'unprecedented early\' effort to capture GOP districts" http://thehill.com/homenews/house/317513-dems-want-staff-in-20-gop-held-house-districts', ">>{Logical_Hare} : He's not good at speaking *period*. The man can barely put coherent sentences together (especially when he gets his dander up about something), and has the vocabulary of a fourth grader.", ">>{pooponagoose} : Hahahaha no Mr. President we're laughing at you, not with you..."], [">>{TrumpIsAntiAmerican} : Nope, we'll never accept Trump as President. He's a shit smear.", '>>{wonderingwhether54} : he will *still* be not my president.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Of course he will be the President, but he will be thought of the same way Republicans who took images of Obama to shoot at gun ranges thought of the man. They don't like him, they don't view him as legitimate, they think he's a dictator, that he's incompetent.", ">>{uhuhuhu} : Why are posting on /r/politics then if you aren't even an american citizen?", ">>{whosfunny} : You don't have to accept it, just like they didn't with Obama.", '>>{quacking_quackeroo} : This year im grateful for how much money my pals and i will scam the american taxpayer for in the next four years. Im gonna make a killing from your hard work. Thank you all.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : What I noticed about the video is they disabled comments and there was no like/dislike bar. I didn't even bother listen to that disgusting human being. He's trash and should be looked at and treated as such.", ">>{billthomson} : It's time for the country to heal from the damage that I have done to it.", '>>{SilvarusLupus} : I could see no comments because the youtube comment section is a shithole. But no like/dislike bar is just being a coward.', '>>{Malaix} : These friendly unite the country messages amount to lipstick on a pig. Hes trying to lull Americans into cooperation while pulling shit in the background. Hes gonna act like your best friend while he guts vital government institutions like public education and the EPA and appoints the craziest fringe elements of the GOP to office.', '>>{Izor28} : This is no different than how these same people reacted to Bush. When Obama got elected they were sure the KKK would start rioting and assassinate him, but the only civil unrest has really been the work of liberal groups like Black Lives Matter. I think the difference is that the MSM is lying so badly that these people are controlled totally by fear of a Trump presidency. If I took the failing NY Times and CNN seriously I would have to share this opinion I think. I mean honestly listen to that video and what he has to say and compare it to the vitriol here. You cant tell me a normal, rational human being responds this way without being extremely scared and nervous. Or hateful perhaps', ">>{john1g} : Republicans didn't riot in the streets when Obama was elected.", '>>{TrumpIsAntiAmerican} : Trump is an egomaniac, so he certainly cares.', ">>{JZcgQR2N} : No one cares what you think. At least 50 million Americans don't, but if saying it makes you feel better, so be it.", ">>{TrumpIsAntiAmerican} : At least 50 million Americans don't think at all."]]

classify and reply

[">>{b0redengr} : The ol' ignorance defense eh? Ignorance, the last refuge of a desperate man with no argument.", '>>{mrason} : he doesnt know manafort? who moved into trump tower in 2006?', '>>{_Ver01} : Would low/medium/bright become the default the next time you turn the flashlight on?', '>>{DC25NYC} : Trump never seems to know much or remember much. WE should put him under oath so we know EXACTLY what he knows', '>>{d_mcc_x} : How could anyone possibly know?! ITS NOT LIKE DONALD WAS READING RESUMES!!!', '>>{Allen_Tomlinson} : The right says Hillary Clinton is responsible for her husband. Why isn’t Melania Trump?', ">>{Panda413} : Melania isn't running for president. A more apt analogy would be if Melania said or did bad things and whether we did/didn't hold Trump responsible.. which is exactly what we did when she plagiarized her RNC speech. Not a trump supporter in any way/shape/form.. but this is a weak point/article.", '>>{Panda413} : And attacks Hillary for having Huma Abedin on staff due to the sins AW. If hiring Abedin is a bad idea because of the behavior of Weiner, how is the idea of electing Trump even in the realm of okay?', '>>{bdelboss} : I think users want a dark mode, multiuser ipads and fixing itunes crap "Let\'s make a 3d touch toggle, they will love it"', ">>{Starburstnova} : I have no idea what that is and it doesn't seem to work on my phone. I don't see any option to switch brightness. Edit: Upon Googling seems like it's only for the 6S and beyond. Might be good information to include.", ">>{BrazenBribery} : One is a trophy wife, the other was actively involved in her philandering husband's former Presidency and shaming or intimidating his adultery victims into silence, then became a Senator, Secretary of State and now is running for President.", '>>{Soldier-2Point0} : [This one gets posted all the time as well](http://i.imgur.com/P8fzuXg.jpg)', ">>{bigkevbosky} : If you don't know what 3D Touch is - how are you even here? It's been a thing for years. How could you have possibly missed knowing about it for all this time?", ">>{Clockwork757} : Melania hasn't been talking a lot, maybe she isn't allowed to have anything to say", ">>{bigkevbosky} : Whoa! Next thing you'll tell us is that you found this magical switch on the side of the phone that silences it!!!!", ">>{Starburstnova} : Because I have an iPhone 6 and I don't obsessively check this subreddit? I came here to see if there was information on the new iOS update. Thought this might be part of that. Apparently not. Not sure why assholes think everybody knows everything and downvote people asking questions or sharing information. Yet the people berating them get upvoted. Not that I give a shit about karma, but this seems like a toxic place if helpful posts are buried and rude comments are made more visible.", '>>{Quetzalcoyote} : This may be the most catastrophically incompetent cover-up in US scandal history. Trump is actually going to be impeached.', '>>{TinyBaron} : The Con Way always manages to [outdo herself.](http://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2016_33/1669321/160815-trump-manafort-mbe-432p_2c14550052a5ecc9bf5a45dd50620ac7.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg) Or maybe they were just delivering pizza.', '>>{Susarian} : My campaign chairman? Never met him. - Donald J. Trump, 2017', ">>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : Yeah, but to be fair Melania isn't running for office. No spouse is responsible for their husband. I dislike Trump but I have no beef with Melania, I just feel bad for her.", ">>{yuhche} : It's been a thing for 18 months not years.", ">>{Bobbydeerwood} : One's a trophy wife, the other is a partner?", ">>{PoppinKREAM} : Who's lived in Trump Tower since 2006 and has had business dealings dating back to the 80s. Totally don't know each other", '>>{checks_out_bot} : It\'s funny because GreendaySucksCock\'s username is very applicable to their comment. ^^*beep* ^^*bop* ^^if ^^you ^^hate ^^me, ^^reply ^^with ^^"stop". ^^If ^^you ^^just ^^got ^^smart, ^^reply ^^with ^^"start".', ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Whose daughters message each other about Donny and Paul running up and down to each other's apartments all the time.", ">>{bigkevbosky} : It was first revealed in September 2014. By my count, that's YEARS, dipshit.", ">>{yuhche} : There's no need be rude and it was introduced with the 6S in 2015 not the 6 in 2014, get your calculations right before acting tough on the Internet.", '>>{bigkevbosky} : It was introduced during the Apple event in September 2014. Again, that means the feature has been public knowledge for years. But thanks for trying to correct me, idiot.', ">>{LeMot-Juste} : After the release of the hacked phones of Manafort's daughters, which message about his close relationship to Trump from way back? Kellyanne needs a sandwich and a tall glass of milk, then a nap. The lies are diminishing her capacity for a consistent narrative.", '>>{lulsworth} : > If anything, the question at this point should be why the GOP attacks Clinton for what Bill did, but supports Trump for doing the same? and then the second question should be if its not ok to attack hillary for it **why is it now ok to attack melania for the same**? as an independent I can say its pretty stupid for them to hold a stance against it until its now convenient to use the same shit attacks trump did. sorta takes all the steam out of the argument against. Clinton cant be above it all if shes swimming in the same cesspool.', '>>{jazzology101} : To be fair, Melania is the mother of Cyber...', '>>{f_leaver} : That\'s the wrong question to ask. The question should be "why is Hillary responsible for Bill, while Donald isn\'t responsible for himself?!"', '>>{JaiC} : She\'s not "responsible for her husband" but if, as the title implies, Bill Clinton is someone to be ashamed of, it certainly reflects poorly on Hillary that she stuck with him. Hillary Clinton is responsible for **her responses** to the many and plausible allegations of sexual abuse against Bill Clinton. Hillary had a much more prominent role in Bill\'s political life. Also, Clinton is the one running for President, not Melania.', ">>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : I totally agree. Trump should not be bringing up Bill's name at all."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{b0redengr} : The ol' ignorance defense eh? Ignorance, the last refuge of a desperate man with no argument.", '>>{mrason} : he doesnt know manafort? who moved into trump tower in 2006?', '>>{DC25NYC} : Trump never seems to know much or remember much. WE should put him under oath so we know EXACTLY what he knows', '>>{d_mcc_x} : How could anyone possibly know?! ITS NOT LIKE DONALD WAS READING RESUMES!!!', '>>{Quetzalcoyote} : This may be the most catastrophically incompetent cover-up in US scandal history. Trump is actually going to be impeached.', '>>{TinyBaron} : The Con Way always manages to [outdo herself.](http://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2016_33/1669321/160815-trump-manafort-mbe-432p_2c14550052a5ecc9bf5a45dd50620ac7.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg) Or maybe they were just delivering pizza.', '>>{Susarian} : My campaign chairman? Never met him. - Donald J. Trump, 2017', ">>{PoppinKREAM} : Who's lived in Trump Tower since 2006 and has had business dealings dating back to the 80s. Totally don't know each other", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Whose daughters message each other about Donny and Paul running up and down to each other's apartments all the time.", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : After the release of the hacked phones of Manafort's daughters, which message about his close relationship to Trump from way back? Kellyanne needs a sandwich and a tall glass of milk, then a nap. The lies are diminishing her capacity for a consistent narrative."], ['>>{_Ver01} : Would low/medium/bright become the default the next time you turn the flashlight on?', '>>{bdelboss} : I think users want a dark mode, multiuser ipads and fixing itunes crap "Let\'s make a 3d touch toggle, they will love it"', ">>{Starburstnova} : I have no idea what that is and it doesn't seem to work on my phone. I don't see any option to switch brightness. Edit: Upon Googling seems like it's only for the 6S and beyond. Might be good information to include.", '>>{Soldier-2Point0} : [This one gets posted all the time as well](http://i.imgur.com/P8fzuXg.jpg)', ">>{bigkevbosky} : If you don't know what 3D Touch is - how are you even here? It's been a thing for years. How could you have possibly missed knowing about it for all this time?", ">>{bigkevbosky} : Whoa! Next thing you'll tell us is that you found this magical switch on the side of the phone that silences it!!!!", ">>{Starburstnova} : Because I have an iPhone 6 and I don't obsessively check this subreddit? I came here to see if there was information on the new iOS update. Thought this might be part of that. Apparently not. Not sure why assholes think everybody knows everything and downvote people asking questions or sharing information. Yet the people berating them get upvoted. Not that I give a shit about karma, but this seems like a toxic place if helpful posts are buried and rude comments are made more visible.", ">>{yuhche} : It's been a thing for 18 months not years.", '>>{checks_out_bot} : It\'s funny because GreendaySucksCock\'s username is very applicable to their comment. ^^*beep* ^^*bop* ^^if ^^you ^^hate ^^me, ^^reply ^^with ^^"stop". ^^If ^^you ^^just ^^got ^^smart, ^^reply ^^with ^^"start".', ">>{bigkevbosky} : It was first revealed in September 2014. By my count, that's YEARS, dipshit.", ">>{yuhche} : There's no need be rude and it was introduced with the 6S in 2015 not the 6 in 2014, get your calculations right before acting tough on the Internet.", '>>{bigkevbosky} : It was introduced during the Apple event in September 2014. Again, that means the feature has been public knowledge for years. But thanks for trying to correct me, idiot.'], ['>>{Allen_Tomlinson} : The right says Hillary Clinton is responsible for her husband. Why isn’t Melania Trump?', ">>{Panda413} : Melania isn't running for president. A more apt analogy would be if Melania said or did bad things and whether we did/didn't hold Trump responsible.. which is exactly what we did when she plagiarized her RNC speech. Not a trump supporter in any way/shape/form.. but this is a weak point/article.", '>>{Panda413} : And attacks Hillary for having Huma Abedin on staff due to the sins AW. If hiring Abedin is a bad idea because of the behavior of Weiner, how is the idea of electing Trump even in the realm of okay?', ">>{BrazenBribery} : One is a trophy wife, the other was actively involved in her philandering husband's former Presidency and shaming or intimidating his adultery victims into silence, then became a Senator, Secretary of State and now is running for President.", ">>{Clockwork757} : Melania hasn't been talking a lot, maybe she isn't allowed to have anything to say", ">>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : Yeah, but to be fair Melania isn't running for office. No spouse is responsible for their husband. I dislike Trump but I have no beef with Melania, I just feel bad for her.", ">>{Bobbydeerwood} : One's a trophy wife, the other is a partner?", '>>{lulsworth} : > If anything, the question at this point should be why the GOP attacks Clinton for what Bill did, but supports Trump for doing the same? and then the second question should be if its not ok to attack hillary for it **why is it now ok to attack melania for the same**? as an independent I can say its pretty stupid for them to hold a stance against it until its now convenient to use the same shit attacks trump did. sorta takes all the steam out of the argument against. Clinton cant be above it all if shes swimming in the same cesspool.', '>>{jazzology101} : To be fair, Melania is the mother of Cyber...', '>>{f_leaver} : That\'s the wrong question to ask. The question should be "why is Hillary responsible for Bill, while Donald isn\'t responsible for himself?!"', '>>{JaiC} : She\'s not "responsible for her husband" but if, as the title implies, Bill Clinton is someone to be ashamed of, it certainly reflects poorly on Hillary that she stuck with him. Hillary Clinton is responsible for **her responses** to the many and plausible allegations of sexual abuse against Bill Clinton. Hillary had a much more prominent role in Bill\'s political life. Also, Clinton is the one running for President, not Melania.', ">>{Shr3kk_Wpg} : I totally agree. Trump should not be bringing up Bill's name at all."]]

classify and reply

[">>{happyantoninscalia} : Sean Spicer hits back after 'mean' SNL parody", '>>{zapichigo} : Mike Pence Called a Central Premise of Trump’s Campaign “Offensive and Unconstitutional”', ">>{IeatBagsOfDick} : Dumb bitch can't just go away? Problem is, she knows all the liberal twats in NYC will vote for her", ">>{mnmgod} : Just thought I'd leave this here for all you undecideds.", '>>{NebulousInference} : I appreciate it. The desperation is quite amusing.', ">>{coursecatalog} : I think we've already made up our minds about your posts.", ">>{GaryRuppert} : can't they find some university for Hillary to be the honorary President of so she'll get out of our lives? She lost. America didn't want her to be President. Go Away Hillary.", '>>{Ochd12} : On the same page as "15 actors you didn\'t know were gay" under a picture of John Travolta. So legit.', '>>{OmegaFemale} : I want to look and see how stupid this is but that website is malignant phone cancer.', ">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : Next you're going to tell me Bill Clinton is running for the Arkansas state legislature or some shit", '>>{ElPlywood} : A nice tall glass of delicious VP Kool Aid has taken care of that.', '>>{CNegan} : Without liberal twats subsidizing red states, red states would literally go under.', '>>{PugiPugiPugi43} : This needs to happen know, draft bill movement for state senate', ">>{Thecalculatorman} : Lol. I hope Trump doesn't pick this Bible Thumping f@ggot as his VP. There are conflicting reports so who the fuck knows if this guy is really his VP.", ">>{LockTheModsUp} : The Clintonistas are doing this because they are pissy that DeBlasio didn't fall over to endorse her quick enough. Just further shows how corrupt they are and how the primaries were rigged against Bernie", ">>{gaeuvyen} : We live in the digital age, that idiom is losing it's meaning considering that digital clocks when broke, don't display anything, therefore they are always wrong. It used to have meaning a a few decades ago when digital watches were just coming out, but as time progresses forward, it loses more and more of it's meaning until not a single person will understand it because they will have never known analog clocks.", '>>{stuthulhu} : I dunno, I find /u/NebulousInference to have heartening accuracy.', '>>{tommy2014015} : Mean "MEAN!" coming from the white house press sec of the most verbally abusive, demeaning, piece of shit president is almost comical', '>>{Deadcharacter} : Oh, the conservatives love safe spaces now. Pathetic.', '>>{Riganthor} : this sounds so much like spicer is saying: mommy SNL is being mean to me', ">>{GaimeGuy} : Reminder that until his current gig, Spicer's career has been as a strategist, not as a spokesperson. He has no idea how to be, or handle being, the public face of an administration.", '>>{TheMovingFinger} : This is an administration of four-year-olds. Did *anyone* understand when they elected this shower of nincompoops?', ">>{LockTheModsUp} : >She lost. America didn't want her to be President. Go Away Hillary. Twice. She apparently didn't get the message after either of her losses", '>>{NorseGod} : Wait, it\'s a "lets compare a Candidate to Hitler" quiz, but not with the candidate who wants to deport an entire ethnicity? The cognitive dissonance live with must be staggering. Sorry about Obama causing the strongest economic growth and lowest unemployment since the last Republican moron was President. Must be a weird coincidence. C U Next Tuesday.', '>>{dyzo-blue} : I love how Putin has appropriated the term "Liberty" for his faux-news blogs from Ron Paul and his faux-news blogs.', '>>{bickering_fool} : They can give it...they just cant take it.', '>>{E-rockComment} : CAN\'T KEEP A GOOD HILL DOWN "TO HILL AND BACK" "ONE LAST HILL TO CLIMB" "WHERE THERE\'S A HILL THERE\'S A WAY" "OLDER AND WISER, BUT NOT OVER THE HILL" "NEW YORK: A SHINING CITY ON A HILL" "SUGARHILL AND THE KAINE" (if the super team re-unites)', ">>{D3korum} : You sir! Right to the top, or Left I don't really know how it works anymore... :(", '>>{papabattaglia} : Poor fucking baby. Jesus Christ this God damned administration.', '>>{Qunidaye} : Who said it Donald Supporter or meth\'d out screaming man with sandwich board saying "Killory #Sprite COoking. Wake up people!" Trick question', ">>{GaryRuppert} : But fortunately for America, she might have won in 2016 if she didn't take the Secretary of State job in 09", '>>{Wolf-Head} : Hits back More like he cries about it.', '>>{entirely12} : And after that loss, Hillary will mount a spirited campaign for the Planning Commission in Chappaqua!', '>>{CisWhiteMealWorm} : Crazy how Reddit goes apeshit over little assumptions that could turn out to be *everything* but true. Is it possible he is his pick for VP? Yes, anything is possible. Is it likely? Maybe, maybe not.', ">>{DBDude} : VPs often change for their running mate. George HW Bush's whole family was pro-choice, even leaders in the movement. They were responsible for many federal family planning laws, including the federal funding of Planned Parenthood. He dumped all that to be Reagan's VP.", '>>{TrumpUnivDropout} : We have top pharmacists keeping Flavor Flav alive just for this. Yea boi!', ">>{omeow} : Sorry Sean aren't you the press sec of a disruptive non-PC administration?", '>>{Heirsandgraces} : I find it bizarre that these people, who should be well versed in comms and PR, continue to make themselves look foolish by responding in such a way. They dont seem to possess any self awareness or understand that being in the public eye opens you up to criticism or ridicule.', ">>{LockTheModsUp} : Probably not. She probably wouldn't have even been the nominee if she wasn't sec of state because America would have moved on.", '>>{dkliberator} : Makes sense why trump would pick him. Or maybe not.', ">>{Thecalculatorman} : I self censor it because I'd preferably not be banned on here.", '>>{Conman_Drumpf} : Would you like them to be more politically correct for you Spicer?', ">>{fco83} : Watch how fox news reports this same story, and that'll be your answer. They only care about how their base receives pretty much anything at this point. They openly give the middle finger to everyone else. And very often, the reporting of these events is twisted by fox news. They'll likely paint it in a way that agrees with Spicer's assessment that he is being treated unfairly.", '>>{mrking944} : Is he not able to hear the words that come out of his mouth? Ignorance is bliss I suppose..', '>>{TemperRed} : When in Gods name is this sham of an administration going to MAN UP and take their lumps like fucking adults instead of crying about every g/d slight? Trump and Co: stfu and do your jobs, you over privileged, pasty faced, sorry excuses for manhood and humanity.', ">>{radickulous} : How come Conservatives can't do comedy? All the great funny comedians make fun of the right. It there isn't a single funny comedian who can parody the left and make it funny. Do they just have no sense of humour?", ">>{MrBullyGoat} : > The Clintonistas are doing this because they are pissy that DeBlasio didn't fall over to endorse her quick enough. It's more likely that Clinton Foundation money is drying up and they need new sources of donations.", '>>{MrBullyGoat} : Without red states blue states would starve. We need each other.', '>>{NebulousInference} : The lack of context is disheartening. http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/marxist.asp >"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We\'re saying that for America to get back on track, we\'re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We\'re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."', '>>{Lhopital_rules} : This quiz is so dumb. Most of the quotes could be interpreted in a million ways. This could have been one of the quotes: > Sometimes society must change for the greater good. HILLARY OR HITLER? Hmm... everyone ever?', '>>{juicetothrowawayfar} : blocking a kid from their scheduled open heart surgery is a mild inconvience, but SNL skit is mean', '>>{Jake314159265359} : It was just a suggestion.^^^/s', ">>{aaronchrisdesign} : Literally full of claims without proof or sources. It's better to compare Hitler's to the candidate that's trying to deport 12 million people and cancel trade agreements.", '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : More Americans wanted to her to be President though. They wanted her to be in our lives.', ">>{Qunidaye} : Excuse me, where's the restroom? Thanks. Stumped yet???", '>>{fordprecept} : There are a lot of quotes by Hitler that, when taken in isolation and not viewed in the context of the atrocities he was committing, sound pretty good. The reality, though, is much different.', '>>{Embowaf} : The Press Secretary said he got so many messages he thought there was a national emergency. Well, there is. Good of you to have noticed, Spicer.', '>>{mnmgod} : How about the candidate who controls the media and enforces propaganda in it?', ">>{LockTheModsUp} : No, it's straight up Clintonista thuggery. I'm sure they'll gladly take the foundation money though. They don't discriminate, be it Wall Street, middle East dictators that decapitate women, etc", ">>{MWM2} : > The Press Secretary said he got so many messages he thought there was a national emergency. How much more of an idiot could he be? *Wait!* I don't want to know the answer.", '>>{Whouiz} : They exist, those southern guys, like Foxworthy and the "Git Er Done" guy. They are the opposite end of progressive comedians.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : She didn't even hold an office for the last 4 years. If she's a Senator from NY, she gets to take credit for voting for a bunch of Obama things, plus she doesn't give anonymous paid speeches to Wall Street or run an illegal email server scheme. If Obama was aiming to screw over Hillary, what would he have done differently? He pushed for an unpopular trade agreement and got her on board with it for a few weeks, he decimated the Democrat party among white voters by siding with BLM radicals, he appointed her to a job where her corruption was brought to light. So maybe Obama did 1 or 2 good things during his Presidency", ">>{TrumptyDumpty911} : Like having Steve bannon on on his campaign. I agree it's bad. Trump needs to be stopped.", '>>{GaryRuppert} : no candidate won a majority and a lot of possible Trump voters stayed home because the polls made them think Trump was gonna lose.', ">>{stuthulhu} : >There's a streak of meanness now that they've crossed over to mean So eloquent.", '>>{Lhopital_rules} : Who used this pen... Hillary Clinton? Or HITLER?!', '>>{Qunidaye} : At first I thought Hitler, but the swastika was a red herring. Upon closer inspection I saw blood residue from Vince foster and Mr. Benghazi. This could be the missing link', ">>{mnmgod} : It really saddens me to see how ignorant this country is, especially the younger generation. A vote is a powerful tool that you are given by the constitution, and you will see what a fool you've been some years from now when clinton bombs your neighborhood in Chicago. But Trump will win, so enjoy your false hope while you still have it.", '>>{Ximitar} : Such a nasty secretary. Such a nasty secretary.', '>>{LockTheModsUp} : Hillary supported the TPP. 8 years is a much longer time to be out the public eye and her nomination was already being pre-ordained as she left the sec of state position so should could start laying plans of run for president a second failed time . BLM has nothing to do with this or your ridiculous argument', '>>{ElCaminoInTheWest} : I worry for you people. What are you going to do on Wednesday?', ">>{AdoptMeBrangelina} : They make fun of theirselves and it's not even funny.", ">>{Ochd12} : Yes, I'm very sure, of all places, Clinton will bomb *Chicago*. What the fuck are you talking about?", '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : The fact is, nearly 3 million more people wanted her in our lives for at least 4 more years. At the very least, more people wanted her in our lives than Trump. >and a lot of possible Trump voters stayed home because the polls made them think Trump was gonna lose. Mere conjecture. You have no objective proof that they stayed home because of polls.', ">>{aledlewis} : Hahaha. It's only going to get Spicier, Sean. Alec Baldwin and Melissa McCarthy are going to be very busy for the next 4 years/impeachment.", '>>{BernieOBustie} : Hillary is a zombie politician. The Democratic Party will never be safe again. The faintest smell of an open office wakes her from her political grave. As long as elections are held, she will walk the earth with her plastic smile and dead eyes, dragging parties down into the abyss.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : She would have been in the Senate from New York over those 8 years. More of a public eye than spending 2013 recovering from a stroke and getting some Wall Street money.', '>>{NebulousInference} : >when clinton bombs your neighborhood in Chicago Good news. [Mental Health](https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/mental-health/) >We have to address the mental health crisis in America and end the stigma and shame associated with treatment.', '>>{alxzen66} : What was that about the alt-right (卐) calling leftistis crybabies running to their safe-spaces?', ">>{OmegaFemale} : omg you just said Hillary Clinton is going to bomb Chicago. I'm going to remember this comment for years to come.", '>>{GaryRuppert} : California picked Hillary, the rest of America picked TRUMP.', '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : Uhm...California is part of America, and more voters in America chose to vote for Hillary Clinton.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : California is a state that loaded their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants through automatic registration. The results from California are dubious, at best. Hillary focused on running up the margins in blue states. Trump focused on winning a majority of electoral votes.', '>>{awesomeness0232} : -Ridiculous conspiracy theories invented and peddled by the conservative media (not a theory, talking about site like Breitbart that are LITERALLY on the payroll of the Republican candidate) -Actual video evidence of fascist ideas. Hmmmmmmmm, which one do I want to believe?', ">>{PixelBlock} : She's probably be popular in New York, but come on. Goading her into another hot political contest with opportunistic enthusiasm is just cruel. She has done her damage. Leave her be.", ">>{Pylons} : > America didn't want her to be President Says nothing about being mayor. Maybe NYC residents want her to be mayor.", '>>{mnmgod} : thank you RIP my karma from that one, did not know that /r/Politics was completely pro-hillary', ">>{GaryRuppert} : wouldn't be the first time she ran for an office before living in the jurisdiction", '>>{Pylons} : > California is a state that loaded their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants through automatic registration. Complete horseshit. [The drivers licenses given out to undocumented immigrants are explicitly not allowed for voting registration.](https://static.votesmart.org/static/billtext/46167.pdf) > (2)\xa0\xa0The license shall bear the following notice: “This card is not acceptable for official federal purposes. This license is issued only as a license to drive a motor vehicle. It does not establish eligibility for employment, voter registration, or public benefits.”', ">>{alxzen66} : there's a skit bit about that on this american life, if I remember correctly. There are some, they just come off as angry. This is not the good, Jon Stewart, angry. That kind of honest anger at the ridiculousness of it. Just condescending anger.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : >California is a state that loaded their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants through automatic registration. The results from California are dubious, at best. I know you like to think your conspiratorial opinion if fact, but it's not. There is no credible evidence of non-citizens voting.", ">>{Pylons} : That's up to the NYC voters to decide if that matters.", '>>{Whouiz} : 😂😂😂😂 yea well... Ohh! The puppet guy... In Vegas... From AmericasGotTalent... Nm you said funny... Im stumped....', '>>{Whouiz} : Wait I got it! Mr. Bill "what happened last night?" Cosby!', ">>{LockTheModsUp} : More a position to take damage, and Sec of state is a much better resume addition. I don't take stroke theorists seriously anyway.", ">>{SunTzu-} : Larry the Cable Guy is pretty terrible, and Foxworthy's best bits are taking the piss out of rednecks (here's your sign etc.). The best comedians for making fun of lefty overreaches are generally free speech centrists.", ">>{Hnetu} : I think it has to do with the fact that the left roll with it? At least, Obama did when it wasn't malicious. Take Key and Peele's 'anger translator' bit. It was a jab at him being soft spoken and passive. And, while good natured, was poignant in pointing out one of Obama's biggest flaws. That he never really 'fought' and, especially in his first four years, bent over backwards to let conservatives get their way. Had he had more of a spine, we might have more progressive policies rather than right-sided compromise. His reaction? He pulled them up on stage and did the bit himself! Same with the birth certificate/lion king thing. By being able to take a joke, then turn it around, it sort of... Declawed those attempts. Hard to brutally make fun of a guy who laughs with you. Trump on the other hand can't take a joke, which just fuels the fire because when he reacts to it, a new joke comes from the reaction. It becomes a feedback loop. Tease, watch reaction, tease about reaction, watch meltdown, tease about meltdown, etc.", ">>{valarauca8} : Comedy is an introspective process where one tries to relate events/experiences of their life to events/experiences of another's. The GOP doesn't care about anyone else, and really isn't introspective.", ">>{onepinksheep} : Well, this *is* the guy who went on a years-long Twitter war with Dippin' Dots, of all things.", ">>{cheo_} : SNL used to be really funny. There's a streak of meanness now that they've crossed over to mean. Meanness is mean! What an eloquent man.", '>>{AnchovieProton} : Or Mr. Perpetually Annoying Intellectual Midget Dennis Miller. People hear him and think, "Wow, that guy is so smart he isn\'t even funny." They are right about one thing.', ">>{washinmyballz} : He's right, there is a national emergency. Trump is President, Bannon is the Chief Strategist and on the National Security Council, and Spicer's Press Secretary just to name a few.", ">>{PM_ME_UR_OBSIDIAN} : If you're a fledgling stand-up comic, there are two audiences that can help you make it big: entertainment media professionals, and [college students](https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/thats-not-funny/399335/). Both demographics skew progressive. Comedians who would make fun of the left start off at a serious handicap. It's not impossible to do conservative comedy well. Consider the firehose of memes that came out of the Trump camp in 2016, some of them were quite catchy.", '>>{lakerswiz} : Why would she even want to do that to herself?', ">>{BraveNewTrump} : The closest thing to conservative comedy I've ever seen was King of the Hill. And even that was self-reflective.", '>>{whadup5} : I know a great therapist that he could use while saving 15% or more on car insurance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfmVBmDKLZI', ">>{SunTzu-} : Louise CK has done some bits on it, but he's obviously not right wing. He's probably center-left at the end of the day. There's a load of others, a lot of classical, but it gets bogged down in arguing are they center-left, libertarian or far left.", ">>{QuinnMD-PhD} : If a post doesn't: 1-knock Trump Or 2-support liberal rhetoric It is down-voted by all in r/politics", ">>{GaryRuppert} : Are you so confident that California's system isn't enrolling illegal immigrants? Government doesn't work that well", ">>{GaryRuppert} : It'd be amusing if Hillary ran and sucked up so much energy that Dems in other races couldn't get going", '>>{Pylons} : You\'re the one making the claim that California is loading "their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants". The burden of proof is on you.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : well, there's not a long road from what Hillary officially had and a stroke", '>>{m3cirrus} : We can buy our food elsewhere with all money we have. Fuck your farms', ">>{GaryRuppert} : Hopefully Congress takes action to standardize voter laws to avoid illegal voters being on the rolls. It's only fair to have a nationwide voter ID law", '>>{Pylons} : If the federal government pays for those IDs and for any legal assistance anyone may need to get their documentation in order for an ID, sure, I can support that. With our hodge-podge system of state-issued IDs, though, no thanks.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : I'd imagine a lot of Dems would oppose nationwide photo ID even if the Government did all the work for the voter.", '>>{ShyllaT} : To register to vote in California you have to give your social security number. Also, when you go to your voting location they have a sign in sheet that only has your name if you had registered. Please explain or at least show proof on how millions of illegal immigrants got away with that.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : does California contact Social Security to verify that the numbers entered are legit? If not, then that's a pretty glaring hole", ">>{Sassyfrassy1212} : What's your source for the millions of illegal votes?", ">>{Pylons} : I didn't say shit besides disputing that California loaded their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants through automatic registration.", ">>{Pylons} : That's not how the burden of proof works. It's on the person making the claim - namely, that California loaded their voter rolls.", '>>{ShyllaT} : The info is sent to the DMV where they check their database for your ss number and if your info is found then the county officials contact you to tell you that your registration is approved. They also check if your ss aligns with your drivers license number/identification, date of birth, and signature. But overall, yes they do contact the SSA to verify your SS', '>>{waterfloater} : Lol I just had a vision of Hillary Clinton as Lady Stoneheart Frome Game of Thrones', '>>{ksherwood11} : You realize there are Farms in blue states, yes?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{happyantoninscalia} : Sean Spicer hits back after 'mean' SNL parody", '>>{tommy2014015} : Mean "MEAN!" coming from the white house press sec of the most verbally abusive, demeaning, piece of shit president is almost comical', '>>{Deadcharacter} : Oh, the conservatives love safe spaces now. Pathetic.', '>>{Riganthor} : this sounds so much like spicer is saying: mommy SNL is being mean to me', ">>{GaimeGuy} : Reminder that until his current gig, Spicer's career has been as a strategist, not as a spokesperson. He has no idea how to be, or handle being, the public face of an administration.", '>>{TheMovingFinger} : This is an administration of four-year-olds. Did *anyone* understand when they elected this shower of nincompoops?', '>>{bickering_fool} : They can give it...they just cant take it.', ">>{D3korum} : You sir! Right to the top, or Left I don't really know how it works anymore... :(", '>>{papabattaglia} : Poor fucking baby. Jesus Christ this God damned administration.', '>>{Wolf-Head} : Hits back More like he cries about it.', ">>{omeow} : Sorry Sean aren't you the press sec of a disruptive non-PC administration?", '>>{Heirsandgraces} : I find it bizarre that these people, who should be well versed in comms and PR, continue to make themselves look foolish by responding in such a way. They dont seem to possess any self awareness or understand that being in the public eye opens you up to criticism or ridicule.', '>>{Conman_Drumpf} : Would you like them to be more politically correct for you Spicer?', ">>{fco83} : Watch how fox news reports this same story, and that'll be your answer. They only care about how their base receives pretty much anything at this point. They openly give the middle finger to everyone else. And very often, the reporting of these events is twisted by fox news. They'll likely paint it in a way that agrees with Spicer's assessment that he is being treated unfairly.", '>>{mrking944} : Is he not able to hear the words that come out of his mouth? Ignorance is bliss I suppose..', '>>{TemperRed} : When in Gods name is this sham of an administration going to MAN UP and take their lumps like fucking adults instead of crying about every g/d slight? Trump and Co: stfu and do your jobs, you over privileged, pasty faced, sorry excuses for manhood and humanity.', ">>{radickulous} : How come Conservatives can't do comedy? All the great funny comedians make fun of the right. It there isn't a single funny comedian who can parody the left and make it funny. Do they just have no sense of humour?", '>>{juicetothrowawayfar} : blocking a kid from their scheduled open heart surgery is a mild inconvience, but SNL skit is mean', '>>{Embowaf} : The Press Secretary said he got so many messages he thought there was a national emergency. Well, there is. Good of you to have noticed, Spicer.', ">>{MWM2} : > The Press Secretary said he got so many messages he thought there was a national emergency. How much more of an idiot could he be? *Wait!* I don't want to know the answer.", '>>{Whouiz} : They exist, those southern guys, like Foxworthy and the "Git Er Done" guy. They are the opposite end of progressive comedians.', ">>{stuthulhu} : >There's a streak of meanness now that they've crossed over to mean So eloquent.", '>>{Ximitar} : Such a nasty secretary. Such a nasty secretary.', ">>{AdoptMeBrangelina} : They make fun of theirselves and it's not even funny.", ">>{aledlewis} : Hahaha. It's only going to get Spicier, Sean. Alec Baldwin and Melissa McCarthy are going to be very busy for the next 4 years/impeachment.", '>>{alxzen66} : What was that about the alt-right (卐) calling leftistis crybabies running to their safe-spaces?', ">>{alxzen66} : there's a skit bit about that on this american life, if I remember correctly. There are some, they just come off as angry. This is not the good, Jon Stewart, angry. That kind of honest anger at the ridiculousness of it. Just condescending anger.", '>>{Whouiz} : 😂😂😂😂 yea well... Ohh! The puppet guy... In Vegas... From AmericasGotTalent... Nm you said funny... Im stumped....', '>>{Whouiz} : Wait I got it! Mr. Bill "what happened last night?" Cosby!', ">>{SunTzu-} : Larry the Cable Guy is pretty terrible, and Foxworthy's best bits are taking the piss out of rednecks (here's your sign etc.). The best comedians for making fun of lefty overreaches are generally free speech centrists.", ">>{Hnetu} : I think it has to do with the fact that the left roll with it? At least, Obama did when it wasn't malicious. Take Key and Peele's 'anger translator' bit. It was a jab at him being soft spoken and passive. And, while good natured, was poignant in pointing out one of Obama's biggest flaws. That he never really 'fought' and, especially in his first four years, bent over backwards to let conservatives get their way. Had he had more of a spine, we might have more progressive policies rather than right-sided compromise. His reaction? He pulled them up on stage and did the bit himself! Same with the birth certificate/lion king thing. By being able to take a joke, then turn it around, it sort of... Declawed those attempts. Hard to brutally make fun of a guy who laughs with you. Trump on the other hand can't take a joke, which just fuels the fire because when he reacts to it, a new joke comes from the reaction. It becomes a feedback loop. Tease, watch reaction, tease about reaction, watch meltdown, tease about meltdown, etc.", ">>{valarauca8} : Comedy is an introspective process where one tries to relate events/experiences of their life to events/experiences of another's. The GOP doesn't care about anyone else, and really isn't introspective.", ">>{onepinksheep} : Well, this *is* the guy who went on a years-long Twitter war with Dippin' Dots, of all things.", ">>{cheo_} : SNL used to be really funny. There's a streak of meanness now that they've crossed over to mean. Meanness is mean! What an eloquent man.", '>>{AnchovieProton} : Or Mr. Perpetually Annoying Intellectual Midget Dennis Miller. People hear him and think, "Wow, that guy is so smart he isn\'t even funny." They are right about one thing.', ">>{washinmyballz} : He's right, there is a national emergency. Trump is President, Bannon is the Chief Strategist and on the National Security Council, and Spicer's Press Secretary just to name a few.", ">>{PM_ME_UR_OBSIDIAN} : If you're a fledgling stand-up comic, there are two audiences that can help you make it big: entertainment media professionals, and [college students](https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/thats-not-funny/399335/). Both demographics skew progressive. Comedians who would make fun of the left start off at a serious handicap. It's not impossible to do conservative comedy well. Consider the firehose of memes that came out of the Trump camp in 2016, some of them were quite catchy.", ">>{BraveNewTrump} : The closest thing to conservative comedy I've ever seen was King of the Hill. And even that was self-reflective.", '>>{whadup5} : I know a great therapist that he could use while saving 15% or more on car insurance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfmVBmDKLZI', ">>{SunTzu-} : Louise CK has done some bits on it, but he's obviously not right wing. He's probably center-left at the end of the day. There's a load of others, a lot of classical, but it gets bogged down in arguing are they center-left, libertarian or far left."], [">>{IeatBagsOfDick} : Dumb bitch can't just go away? Problem is, she knows all the liberal twats in NYC will vote for her", ">>{GaryRuppert} : can't they find some university for Hillary to be the honorary President of so she'll get out of our lives? She lost. America didn't want her to be President. Go Away Hillary.", ">>{PugiPugiPugi43} : Next you're going to tell me Bill Clinton is running for the Arkansas state legislature or some shit", '>>{CNegan} : Without liberal twats subsidizing red states, red states would literally go under.', '>>{PugiPugiPugi43} : This needs to happen know, draft bill movement for state senate', ">>{LockTheModsUp} : The Clintonistas are doing this because they are pissy that DeBlasio didn't fall over to endorse her quick enough. Just further shows how corrupt they are and how the primaries were rigged against Bernie", ">>{LockTheModsUp} : >She lost. America didn't want her to be President. Go Away Hillary. Twice. She apparently didn't get the message after either of her losses", '>>{E-rockComment} : CAN\'T KEEP A GOOD HILL DOWN "TO HILL AND BACK" "ONE LAST HILL TO CLIMB" "WHERE THERE\'S A HILL THERE\'S A WAY" "OLDER AND WISER, BUT NOT OVER THE HILL" "NEW YORK: A SHINING CITY ON A HILL" "SUGARHILL AND THE KAINE" (if the super team re-unites)', ">>{GaryRuppert} : But fortunately for America, she might have won in 2016 if she didn't take the Secretary of State job in 09", '>>{entirely12} : And after that loss, Hillary will mount a spirited campaign for the Planning Commission in Chappaqua!', ">>{LockTheModsUp} : Probably not. She probably wouldn't have even been the nominee if she wasn't sec of state because America would have moved on.", ">>{MrBullyGoat} : > The Clintonistas are doing this because they are pissy that DeBlasio didn't fall over to endorse her quick enough. It's more likely that Clinton Foundation money is drying up and they need new sources of donations.", '>>{MrBullyGoat} : Without red states blue states would starve. We need each other.', '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : More Americans wanted to her to be President though. They wanted her to be in our lives.', ">>{LockTheModsUp} : No, it's straight up Clintonista thuggery. I'm sure they'll gladly take the foundation money though. They don't discriminate, be it Wall Street, middle East dictators that decapitate women, etc", ">>{GaryRuppert} : She didn't even hold an office for the last 4 years. If she's a Senator from NY, she gets to take credit for voting for a bunch of Obama things, plus she doesn't give anonymous paid speeches to Wall Street or run an illegal email server scheme. If Obama was aiming to screw over Hillary, what would he have done differently? He pushed for an unpopular trade agreement and got her on board with it for a few weeks, he decimated the Democrat party among white voters by siding with BLM radicals, he appointed her to a job where her corruption was brought to light. So maybe Obama did 1 or 2 good things during his Presidency", '>>{GaryRuppert} : no candidate won a majority and a lot of possible Trump voters stayed home because the polls made them think Trump was gonna lose.', '>>{LockTheModsUp} : Hillary supported the TPP. 8 years is a much longer time to be out the public eye and her nomination was already being pre-ordained as she left the sec of state position so should could start laying plans of run for president a second failed time . BLM has nothing to do with this or your ridiculous argument', '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : The fact is, nearly 3 million more people wanted her in our lives for at least 4 more years. At the very least, more people wanted her in our lives than Trump. >and a lot of possible Trump voters stayed home because the polls made them think Trump was gonna lose. Mere conjecture. You have no objective proof that they stayed home because of polls.', '>>{BernieOBustie} : Hillary is a zombie politician. The Democratic Party will never be safe again. The faintest smell of an open office wakes her from her political grave. As long as elections are held, she will walk the earth with her plastic smile and dead eyes, dragging parties down into the abyss.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : She would have been in the Senate from New York over those 8 years. More of a public eye than spending 2013 recovering from a stroke and getting some Wall Street money.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : California picked Hillary, the rest of America picked TRUMP.', '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : Uhm...California is part of America, and more voters in America chose to vote for Hillary Clinton.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : California is a state that loaded their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants through automatic registration. The results from California are dubious, at best. Hillary focused on running up the margins in blue states. Trump focused on winning a majority of electoral votes.', ">>{PixelBlock} : She's probably be popular in New York, but come on. Goading her into another hot political contest with opportunistic enthusiasm is just cruel. She has done her damage. Leave her be.", ">>{Pylons} : > America didn't want her to be President Says nothing about being mayor. Maybe NYC residents want her to be mayor.", ">>{GaryRuppert} : wouldn't be the first time she ran for an office before living in the jurisdiction", '>>{Pylons} : > California is a state that loaded their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants through automatic registration. Complete horseshit. [The drivers licenses given out to undocumented immigrants are explicitly not allowed for voting registration.](https://static.votesmart.org/static/billtext/46167.pdf) > (2)\xa0\xa0The license shall bear the following notice: “This card is not acceptable for official federal purposes. This license is issued only as a license to drive a motor vehicle. It does not establish eligibility for employment, voter registration, or public benefits.”', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : >California is a state that loaded their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants through automatic registration. The results from California are dubious, at best. I know you like to think your conspiratorial opinion if fact, but it's not. There is no credible evidence of non-citizens voting.", ">>{Pylons} : That's up to the NYC voters to decide if that matters.", ">>{LockTheModsUp} : More a position to take damage, and Sec of state is a much better resume addition. I don't take stroke theorists seriously anyway.", '>>{lakerswiz} : Why would she even want to do that to herself?', ">>{QuinnMD-PhD} : If a post doesn't: 1-knock Trump Or 2-support liberal rhetoric It is down-voted by all in r/politics", ">>{GaryRuppert} : Are you so confident that California's system isn't enrolling illegal immigrants? Government doesn't work that well", ">>{GaryRuppert} : It'd be amusing if Hillary ran and sucked up so much energy that Dems in other races couldn't get going", '>>{Pylons} : You\'re the one making the claim that California is loading "their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants". The burden of proof is on you.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : well, there's not a long road from what Hillary officially had and a stroke", '>>{m3cirrus} : We can buy our food elsewhere with all money we have. Fuck your farms', ">>{GaryRuppert} : Hopefully Congress takes action to standardize voter laws to avoid illegal voters being on the rolls. It's only fair to have a nationwide voter ID law", '>>{Pylons} : If the federal government pays for those IDs and for any legal assistance anyone may need to get their documentation in order for an ID, sure, I can support that. With our hodge-podge system of state-issued IDs, though, no thanks.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : I'd imagine a lot of Dems would oppose nationwide photo ID even if the Government did all the work for the voter.", '>>{ShyllaT} : To register to vote in California you have to give your social security number. Also, when you go to your voting location they have a sign in sheet that only has your name if you had registered. Please explain or at least show proof on how millions of illegal immigrants got away with that.', ">>{GaryRuppert} : does California contact Social Security to verify that the numbers entered are legit? If not, then that's a pretty glaring hole", ">>{Sassyfrassy1212} : What's your source for the millions of illegal votes?", ">>{Pylons} : I didn't say shit besides disputing that California loaded their voter rolls with millions of illegal immigrants through automatic registration.", ">>{Pylons} : That's not how the burden of proof works. It's on the person making the claim - namely, that California loaded their voter rolls.", '>>{ShyllaT} : The info is sent to the DMV where they check their database for your ss number and if your info is found then the county officials contact you to tell you that your registration is approved. They also check if your ss aligns with your drivers license number/identification, date of birth, and signature. But overall, yes they do contact the SSA to verify your SS', '>>{waterfloater} : Lol I just had a vision of Hillary Clinton as Lady Stoneheart Frome Game of Thrones', '>>{ksherwood11} : You realize there are Farms in blue states, yes?'], ['>>{zapichigo} : Mike Pence Called a Central Premise of Trump’s Campaign “Offensive and Unconstitutional”', '>>{ElPlywood} : A nice tall glass of delicious VP Kool Aid has taken care of that.', ">>{Thecalculatorman} : Lol. I hope Trump doesn't pick this Bible Thumping f@ggot as his VP. There are conflicting reports so who the fuck knows if this guy is really his VP.", ">>{gaeuvyen} : We live in the digital age, that idiom is losing it's meaning considering that digital clocks when broke, don't display anything, therefore they are always wrong. It used to have meaning a a few decades ago when digital watches were just coming out, but as time progresses forward, it loses more and more of it's meaning until not a single person will understand it because they will have never known analog clocks.", '>>{CisWhiteMealWorm} : Crazy how Reddit goes apeshit over little assumptions that could turn out to be *everything* but true. Is it possible he is his pick for VP? Yes, anything is possible. Is it likely? Maybe, maybe not.', ">>{DBDude} : VPs often change for their running mate. George HW Bush's whole family was pro-choice, even leaders in the movement. They were responsible for many federal family planning laws, including the federal funding of Planned Parenthood. He dumped all that to be Reagan's VP.", '>>{TrumpUnivDropout} : We have top pharmacists keeping Flavor Flav alive just for this. Yea boi!', '>>{dkliberator} : Makes sense why trump would pick him. Or maybe not.', ">>{Thecalculatorman} : I self censor it because I'd preferably not be banned on here.", '>>{Jake314159265359} : It was just a suggestion.^^^/s'], [">>{mnmgod} : Just thought I'd leave this here for all you undecideds.", '>>{NebulousInference} : I appreciate it. The desperation is quite amusing.', ">>{coursecatalog} : I think we've already made up our minds about your posts.", '>>{Ochd12} : On the same page as "15 actors you didn\'t know were gay" under a picture of John Travolta. So legit.', '>>{OmegaFemale} : I want to look and see how stupid this is but that website is malignant phone cancer.', '>>{stuthulhu} : I dunno, I find /u/NebulousInference to have heartening accuracy.', '>>{NorseGod} : Wait, it\'s a "lets compare a Candidate to Hitler" quiz, but not with the candidate who wants to deport an entire ethnicity? The cognitive dissonance live with must be staggering. Sorry about Obama causing the strongest economic growth and lowest unemployment since the last Republican moron was President. Must be a weird coincidence. C U Next Tuesday.', '>>{dyzo-blue} : I love how Putin has appropriated the term "Liberty" for his faux-news blogs from Ron Paul and his faux-news blogs.', '>>{Qunidaye} : Who said it Donald Supporter or meth\'d out screaming man with sandwich board saying "Killory #Sprite COoking. Wake up people!" Trick question', '>>{NebulousInference} : The lack of context is disheartening. http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/marxist.asp >"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We\'re saying that for America to get back on track, we\'re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We\'re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."', '>>{Lhopital_rules} : This quiz is so dumb. Most of the quotes could be interpreted in a million ways. This could have been one of the quotes: > Sometimes society must change for the greater good. HILLARY OR HITLER? Hmm... everyone ever?', ">>{aaronchrisdesign} : Literally full of claims without proof or sources. It's better to compare Hitler's to the candidate that's trying to deport 12 million people and cancel trade agreements.", ">>{Qunidaye} : Excuse me, where's the restroom? Thanks. Stumped yet???", '>>{fordprecept} : There are a lot of quotes by Hitler that, when taken in isolation and not viewed in the context of the atrocities he was committing, sound pretty good. The reality, though, is much different.', '>>{mnmgod} : How about the candidate who controls the media and enforces propaganda in it?', ">>{TrumptyDumpty911} : Like having Steve bannon on on his campaign. I agree it's bad. Trump needs to be stopped.", '>>{Lhopital_rules} : Who used this pen... Hillary Clinton? Or HITLER?!', '>>{Qunidaye} : At first I thought Hitler, but the swastika was a red herring. Upon closer inspection I saw blood residue from Vince foster and Mr. Benghazi. This could be the missing link', ">>{mnmgod} : It really saddens me to see how ignorant this country is, especially the younger generation. A vote is a powerful tool that you are given by the constitution, and you will see what a fool you've been some years from now when clinton bombs your neighborhood in Chicago. But Trump will win, so enjoy your false hope while you still have it.", '>>{ElCaminoInTheWest} : I worry for you people. What are you going to do on Wednesday?', ">>{Ochd12} : Yes, I'm very sure, of all places, Clinton will bomb *Chicago*. What the fuck are you talking about?", '>>{NebulousInference} : >when clinton bombs your neighborhood in Chicago Good news. [Mental Health](https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/mental-health/) >We have to address the mental health crisis in America and end the stigma and shame associated with treatment.', ">>{OmegaFemale} : omg you just said Hillary Clinton is going to bomb Chicago. I'm going to remember this comment for years to come.", '>>{awesomeness0232} : -Ridiculous conspiracy theories invented and peddled by the conservative media (not a theory, talking about site like Breitbart that are LITERALLY on the payroll of the Republican candidate) -Actual video evidence of fascist ideas. Hmmmmmmmm, which one do I want to believe?', '>>{mnmgod} : thank you RIP my karma from that one, did not know that /r/Politics was completely pro-hillary']]

classify and reply

[">>{NerdyRomantic} : Donald Trump Rally Breaks Elton John's Attendance Record At River City Arena", '>>{CarmineFields} : How many fire marshals did Donnie have to attack?', '>>{ShroudedSciuridae} : He was African American, so just the one.', '>>{ryan924} : Joe Biden: Trump’s Attacks on Judge Are Racist, But ‘It’s Not the Racism That Frightens Me’', '>>{ledhe} : Democrats: Whether You Like It Or Not, Here Is Your Purity Test', ">>{classic_douche} : It's nice how facts aren't enough to slow down their partisan bickering.", ">>{DickButtwoman} : >Questions 1: Do you resolve to serve as a representative with a sober understanding of the harm the DNC has caused millions of Americans? Buy into our narrative about the last election about Bernie being completely slighted or you're not progressive enough? This sounds like a 10 year old wrote this.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Yeah. It's pretty amateur. That being said, there is some truth to the democrats not having learned anything at all from the last election. This just isn't the way to go about it.", ">>{dam_3} : Did the DNC take everyone's lunch money or something?", ">>{AngerMacFadden} : I bet he is frightened having to endure Clinton state of the union speeches. He should have faith, she'd probably deliver them via a giant killer robot anyhow.", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : We're looking 4 months after an election. Even the Tea Party's Come to Jesus concentration took almost a year to build. The party isn't going to change overnight.", '>>{ItsSing} : She already said she used a cloth to wipe everything, stop spreading bad rumors.', ">>{KopOut} : He actually highlighted something in this speech that I don't think many people were aware Trump actually said. A very good point by Biden IMO.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : The steps they have taken so far aren't encouraging.", '>>{BlueDogDem62} : Joe "You cannot go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin\' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I\'m not joking." Biden', '>>{jonpkay} : Senate Republicans can save the country — and their party — from Trump', '>>{arcxa} : Clinton is a drug dealer looking at her tactics. Stronger to-get-her (in jail)!', '>>{redgrass40} : Whelp I guess that about wraps it up. Go home everyone; Trump has won the election.', '>>{hearthneewb} : Even as a criminal the Clinton-Kaine ticket is stronger than Trump. Or did you forget Kaine was on the ticket so having Hillary unable to do the job is barely an issue?', ">>{Clay_Statue} : Personally it is his orange skin and tiny hands that are especially concerning. He holds a grape like it's an apple.", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : The only step so far is DNC Chair, and if Perez and Ellison aren't an encouraging pair, I don't know what to tell you.", '>>{HIGHx1000000NRG} : How to be politically incorrect at a Trump rally: hold up a pocket sized copy of the US constitution.', ">>{ledhe} : Yes, let's keep running candidates that the base doesn't like to ensure we keep losing. /s", '>>{WhyIsThereSomething} : Since when is Mexico a race? Also, you know the judge is part of *La Raza* right? I assuming people know enough mexican to figure that one out?', '>>{arcxa} : Kaine? This one is quite cheap to bought.', '>>{Deofol7} : Well it is over. Polls are wrong. He had people at a rally. Pack it in guys. Why even post?', ">>{hearthneewb} : I'd rather a bought man than one who hates LGBT folk is against contraception and hates women's rights without being bought.", ">>{arcxa} : Trump never said anything bad about LGBT community. And nothing about hating women's rights. Also never heard about contraception stuff, source. But thanks for admiting that Hilldawg is a criminal and Kaine is bought.", '>>{jonpkay} : It is not going to take much for the change to be very slow on some issues.', '>>{StupidRuralAmerican} : They are going to hijack the Presidency and shove down our collective throats a far right agenda, that will take us decades to recover from. During which time, Russia/China will power project their way through half the globe and pretty much define the end of American dominance. Way to go low information/low education voters.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : I'd also say, Pelosi continuing as minority leader is also pretty disappointing. Particularly since she literally said nothing needs to change. I'm not sure what to make of Schumer yet... I'm not really against the typical guys still being in the leadership, but it would have been incredibly encouraging if either the minority leader in the house or senate, or the DNC chair itself went the way of the Bernie wing. They are 40% of the party and right now don't really occupy a spot in the leadership. I totally get why people are holding their nose to the democratic party. I think for the past decade and a half they've gotten away with just not being insane like the republicans. I don't think it's wrong for people to expect more. Given the bare minimum eventually pisses people off.", '>>{Cupinacup} : The part of the Obama presidency I\'m gonna miss the most is the Onion\'s "Diamond Joe" Biden articles.', '>>{hearthneewb} : I was referring to Pence a piece of human garbage and why no sane person should ever vote for Trump. As for Kaine being bought literally every politician has claimed expenses. Hardly an issue unless you want to be dishonest and ignore everyone else (including again Pence).', '>>{arcxa} : Pence is not at the top of the ticket, calling shots. Frankly Pence and Kaine are both irrelevant.', ">>{IbanezDavy} : Keep running candidates that your base doesn't like in favor for one that might appeal to the base that is never going to fucking vote for you. Quit tempting conservatives with pseudo-conservatives, because they'll choose the real conservative every...fucking...time. Or at least the one 'running' as a conservative. John McCain didn't win the fucking president being a moderate conservative. Neither did fucking Mitt Romney. Pick a progressive and you'll get the same returns Obama got. Because even though Obama wasn't a huge progressive, he at least ran in a fashion that let people project those progressive values onto him and mixing that with some of his actual progressive positions allowed him to crush both the 'moderates' Mittens and Micky.", ">>{because_im_boring} : It's funny how different the tone of reporting was back when no one knew anything about him.", '>>{TrumpOnLolitaExpress} : The Dane Cook of politics. Says stupid words, does whacky movements, quickly fades away after he steals material from those before him.', ">>{CcrLyaSrtIatLy} : Just step out on the balcony and fire off a couple blasts from a double-barrel shotgun. I hear that's the best way to get rid of bad guys.", ">>{GhostOfJebsCampaign} : Racism has now evolved to include nationality and religion as long as you're not White.", ">>{scaldingramen} : Some issues. But they know they can't stop every move of his. Too much obvious dysfunction and the government will appear to be flailing even under complete republican control. Mitch M is a big believer in only bringing up a vote if you're positive you can win it. So if the rank and file are restless, the issue is likely to get buried to avoid public conflict.", ">>{GhostOfJebsCampaign} : lol You can look right on the La Raza Judge's website and see it has National Council of La Raza listed as an affiliate.", '>>{ryan924} : Affiliates listed on La Raza Lawyers Association website: " Los Angeles Mexican American Bar Association San Francisco La Raza Lawyers San Diego La Raza Lawyers Santa Clara La Raza Lawyers Orange County Hispanic Bar Association Sacramento La Raza Lawyers Inland Empire LRLA Hispanic National Bar Association Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund California Bar Association Lawyer Referral Services by County"', '>>{majestic_wolf_fangs} : can\'t wait for the polls to flip to Trumps favor so we can hear why they\'re "meaningless".', ">>{HanMaBoogie} : The Dane Cook of politics. Ouch. Trump will only screw up the economy and set back American diplomacy by decades. He's not Dane Cook bad.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Imagine what would have happened if the choice didn't turn off so many. you Might have actually won the electoral college.", ">>{CollumMcJingleballs} : Mitch McConnell just wants trump to give him what he wants and he'll dump him soon after", '>>{hearthneewb} : Except no because the VP actually has to do stuff and fill in. Remember how much cheney was in charge? Remember how much Biden has done? VP are just as important but I can understand ignoring them if you had Pence on your side.', '>>{arcxa} : I can understand why making a big deal of VPs if you have a Hillary on your side. Oaf better than crook.', ">>{hearthneewb} : No I pretty strongly disagree with that. I'd rather a competent criminal than a oaf.", ">>{whenfoom} : Biden is always frightened and sad. He's a Victorian namby-pamby.", '>>{PostTruthPete} : B.S. Trump is a dream come true for them.', '>>{ryan924} : If you clicked on the link, you would see that that org is not the hate group that Trump is trying to pretend it is', ">>{layzpcofcrap} : Our military is still way better than theirs, and the end of US dominance won't go down easy. Which means there will be an inevitable conflict. We just have to hope someone sane is in charge when it comes.", ">>{freecavitycreep} : Or, maybe, if the Russians hadn't hacked the elections, we would have won the EC, too.", ">>{StupidRuralAmerican} : I hope your are right. But Russia has Trump by the balls. He will not act in the best interest of America. He didn't during the campaign, no reason to believe he will now.", '>>{layzpcofcrap} : > the rank and file I think they hardly exist anymore. Between president Twit and Cruz "fuck up everything in the Senate for my own agenda", why hold back? At the minimum every Senator will be leaking to the press anytime something skeevy is going on. The Post is going to be busy.', ">>{Tsarevich_Lyagushka} : Oh Vox, you're still refusing to accept reality.", ">>{wearywarrior} : > Way to go low information/low education voters. What did you ever expect from them? God damn it, the fact that we ever trusted them makes me ten times angrier than the fact that they did something stupid because they're old and scared of being forced to be gay or some moronic shit like that.", '>>{hearthneewb} : Her approval rating prior to running would kind of disagree with that', '>>{IbanezDavy} : Is there any evidence they hacked voting booths? If not, then your statement is unsupportable. If so, publish it. I am looking for things to be outraged about.', '>>{Deofol7} : Polls for president are meaningful when viewed in aggregate on an electoral map. Those have pretty much been for Hillary since day one', ">>{freecavitycreep} : There's more than one way to skin a cat.", ">>{Bumblelicious} : > Our military is still way better than theirs, I'm not sure why you think this matters. We aren't ever fighting a war like world war two again. The only weapons system a country needs is nuclear deterrent. The rest is just power projection for police action. This just means the US spends blood and treasure shitting in places like Afghanistan or Yemen while Asia becomes the center of finance, culture, and science.", '>>{layzpcofcrap} : In general I agree. Why it matters is that as China, Russia, and to a lesser extent other powers ascend, there will be conflicts over resources. Our military meanwhile has a long way to fall. At some point, someone will test our mettle, politically at first. Then shots will be fired and there will be battles, maybe fought through proxies but it will be another Iraq or worse, which is why I said someone sane will be needed. I am saying this will get very ugly. I\'m not saying "USA #1 no one can beat us", I\'m saying if China tries to dominate even a small nation and we come to their aid, it won\'t end quickly.', '>>{WhyIsThereSomething} : You mean the same org, that only offers subsidized housing to latinos? the same group that encourages illegal immigration? The same group that **helped give out fake SSNs and gave tutorials on how to fake your identity to get hired?**', ">>{IbanezDavy} : In that particular case, there's only one. Change the actual voting tallies from what they originally were to what they were reported at. If this did not happen, it is not hacking the election. This is extremely misleading and you know it. They hacked the DNC, not the damn election. The Russians are not responsible for how idiot Americans cast their vote unless those Russians literally changed their ballot from what they selected.", '>>{arcxa} : Prior to running meaning before all shit hitted the fan.', '>>{stupid-rando} : Point taken, but there is the issue about the nuke codes. Dane Cook was a disaster, but we still have comedy after Dane Cook.', '>>{hearthneewb} : you forget the 30 years of mudslinging she has faced? When in office she works efficiently and pretty well respected. its when she campaigns she gets hated', '>>{arcxa} : Never attack your enemies when they are at their strongest.', '>>{du44} : I asked the same thing when people were shitposting the same thing about Sanders, and I got downvoted to hell.', '>>{hearthneewb} : So yeah lets just ignore all the good she has done and how none of the attacks against her has ever stuck.', '>>{freecavitycreep} : http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/06/intelligence-community-says-putin-ordered-campaign-to-influence-election-denigrate-clinton.html >"**We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election**. Russia\'s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump," the report said, adding that intelligence agencies have "high confidence" in that assessment. Election, hacked! http://www.dictionary.com/browse/hack?s=t Or is that not PC enough for you?', ">>{IbanezDavy} : That's not hacking the election. Putin can be for whatever side he wants. I get the beef with wanting a response to them hacking the DNC. But that is not hacking the election, and it is incredibly dishonest to frame it that way and you know it. It's why some people, to this day, literally think the Russians changed who they voted for. That's not true (at least there is no evidence for it). And if you propagate that like it's fact knowing it is not true, then you are lying.", ">>{stupid-rando} : I've been on a Netflix comedy binge: Aziz, Bill Burr, Bill Maher, Hannibal Buress, Jim Jefferies, Jim Gaffigan, Tom Segura...", '>>{ledhe} : Keep pissing off 46% of the party and enjoy losing in perpetuity.', ">>{johnmountain} : They did actually. They poured all the money into Clinton's campaign, instead of spreading it to states and districts. One of the reason the Democrats were wiped out.", '>>{johnmountain} : Not admitting they slighted him and that this was a problem means they will continue to do it. It\'s more relevant than you think for "unity", if that\'s what the establishment actually want. Of course, I don\'t think they actually want unity. They just want those votes without having to do anything for them.', ">>{hearthneewb} : http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/09/carly-fiorina-debate-hillary-clintons-greatest-accomplishment-213157 Maybe actually research candidates before saying shit like that. Real talk what good has TRUMP done? Because he's pretty much only fucked people over as a businessman.", '>>{hearthneewb} : but votes for it despite his own personal beliefs. AKA what a politician should be doing.', '>>{arcxa} : Speeches and participation trophies. Trump from the top of my head turned millions into billions.', '>>{not_a_throwaway23} : Destruction of evidence. Only a crime when the lower-classes do it.', ">>{not_a_throwaway23} : >Even as a criminal the Clinton-Kaine ticket is stronger than Trump. Or did you forget Kaine was on the ticket so having Hillary unable to do the job is barely an issue? Good point. She's clearly dying, so we should look hard at what a President Kaine would be like for the US.", '>>{not_a_throwaway23} : Yes, throwing out your personal convictions in exchange for money and power is exactly what a politician "should be doing."', ">>{SandraLee48} : Clinton advocate back on his heels trying to defend her. Resorts to accusing Trump instead of offering a plausible explanation for Clinton's actions.", ">>{SandraLee48} : When you have to go negative on your opponent to make the case for your candidate you're in a weak position.", '>>{hearthneewb} : A politician should be nothing more than a voice of the people. If the people are anti abortion it doesn\'t matter what they believe they should also be anti abortion. I know this is a hard concept to grasp but Republicans really do seem to like "sticking on an issue" no matter how abhorrent that position is', '>>{hearthneewb} : When you\'re buying a new table do you go "Hmmm that table has only 1 mark so its worthless and that table has 18 marks so its also worthless" or do you go "Oh this table only has 1 mark its clearly superior to the table with 18 and there doesn\'t seem to be any with 0 marks".', '>>{not_a_throwaway23} : I see. Then I guess it would be best if we get rid of politicians and just vote on everything ourselves. Mob rule always works out for the best.', ">>{Lurial} : No intent I didn't intend to destroy multiple devices with a hammer i swear!", '>>{JohnnyRandazzo} : some would argue that his stance has changed on the issue for political reasons. he voted in support of the pro life license plates that the money goes towards a group that fights against abortions.', ">>{hearthneewb} : Thats expensive and costly hell this election alone is way too much money and honestly not worth the hassle. You elect people and have them carry out their proposed policies it doesn't matter what they believe only what they plan to do", '>>{SandraLee48} : IMO Clinton is a well marked table, as is Trump.', ">>{linguotgr} : Maybe there was a spider on the phones and they were just smashing the spiders. You can't prove that's not what happened.", '>>{counters} : The innuendo being spread here - that the staff destroyed the devices **during the FBI investigation** in order to destroy evidence - is entirely unsubstantiated. Perez merely confirms that SOP was to physically destroy Clinton\'s outdated devices as practice. Is that a "best practice" for disabling and destroying devices which may have been used for sensitive communications? No, and the State Department almost certainly has guidelines on the proper methods to use. But this is all stuff that the FBI knew and took it into account when evaluating Clinton\'s actions as Secretary of State. There isn\'t anything new here, except for the patently false insinuation that the phones were destroyed *deliberately to hamper an FBI investigation.*', ">>{00chris00} : Don't be retarded, everybody knows you can only kill spiders with fire", ">>{wavescrashover} : Thank you! It's almost as if most of the people criticizing her/them for this didn't even bother to read through the FBI briefing.", '>>{Stinsudamus} : I read it. They said they can\'t prove she or her staff did it deliberately. To the point of saying if it was not deliberate, and if they did not know that their handling, dissemination, and destruction of classified information broached policy they were all briefed on at some point then it was being "inept" if they did it by accident rather than purposefully. Benefit of the doubt and all that... But going off of sop to destroy devices in your way and not letting the government make backups like they are supposed to, among the many other aspects of this... It does cast a little doubt on their intentions.', '>>{adamlh} : Can we get a fact check on that? ~ best part of the whole video.', ">>{counters} : Well, no, you've glossed over an important detail. If Clinton's phones were *routinely* destroyed once they were no longer in use, and all of this occurred **before the investigations began**, then there is nothing new and noteworthy here. You need to establish that this practice continued *after* the investigations began, and even then, you won't be able to argue that they **deliberately** destroyed them to hamper the investigation unless you can offer evidence that documents this motive.", ">>{PogotowieAlkoholowe} : Uhh except that you aren't buying tables. A more accurate analogy would be, oh this doctor has only had 10 malpractice suits while this other one has had 50. It's a shit situation all around.", '>>{Stinsudamus} : That\'s the key component here. No official investigation came to the determination that they didn\'t deliberately do it. Only that they couldn\'t prove intent. With the sniper fire, amongst many many other lies her and her campaign has told both before, during, and after the investigation... Some people feel like maybe they wouldn\'t tell the truth since that would land them in jail. Maybe... Just maybe... With hours of "I do not recall" from various people among various investigations about details they absolutely should know... Maybe that makes em seem a little like they might be lying. Just maybe. Whatever though, I\'m sure there is not a shred of doubt about this for you. Fine enough. I have some doubts over their honesty though, and no amount of legal strategy makes a misdirecting-non answer that\'s given over and over across multiple investigations and many many people look "transparent and honest"', ">>{fat_osvaldo} : Yeah it's terrible spin on this talking point. The more relevant one is how the email archive devices were lost in the mail which is far more shady imo but doesn't generate buzz like this does.", ">>{IslamicShibe} : It's interesting this was released on a Friday before Labor Day weekend. Only makes me want to vote for Trump more...", '>>{counters} : We\'re not talking about "intent" or "sniper fire" or anything else. The topic here is singular and based on a very specific allegation: *did Clinton\'s staff deliberately destroy cell phones in lieu of handing them over as evidence in the FBI\'s investigation into Clinton\'s e-mail server?* That\'s the innuendo here. And that would be a really bad, egregious thing - if it were True, and there was evidence that Clinton ordered the cell phones to be destroyed, she would be going to federal prison for deliberately obstructing an FBI investigation. But it\'s *entirely, 100% unsubstantiated innuendo*. Instead, what **actually** happened is that long before the investigations ever began, it was SoP for Hillary\'s staff to dispose of her out-of-date or otherwise replaced cell phones by physically destroying them. That\'s clearly not the best way to dispose of them, and the State Department almost certainly has an approved process that should\'ve been followed. But this is something that the FBI **CLEARLY** knew about, since we\'re learning about it *from the release of their own investigation and interview notes.* There was no wrong-doing. The innuendo is a bald-faced lie. Don\'t try to change the topic; either *be honest* and criticize and obvious lie and smear, or remain silent. But sometimes remaining silent speaks the loudest about ones\' character.', '>>{Stinsudamus} : Ok. So I feel that they deliberately did do such a thing, both prior to and during the investigation. As such as you mention that the state department has different procedures in place, and ones that include backups. The only contention here is that they say they didn\'t do this on purpose to hinder the fbi. I feel as if they did. The only evidence they are lying would come from them telling the truth about lying. I don\'t think that\'s gonna happen. They have lost the benefit of the doubt with me, and need to prove hey are on the up and up. The sniper fire and all the other lies are not directly tied to this, except that it shows character and willingness to lie. Sometimes actually typing out a response to the comment rather than copy and pasting large sections says a lot about someone\'s character as well since you broached that topic. I already know the "there is no evidence" line that\'s coming, and that correct. At this point it\'s down to telling the truth, something both her and her campaign has not done many many times... And I feel establishes the pattern. You don\'t. We don\'t need to discuss it further than the invisible pink unicorn I hang out with. Because I\'m telling the truth, and you have no proof otherwise.', '>>{imavgatbest} : So the fact that they did this after subpoenas were issued is insignificant? Fascinating.', '>>{whyReadThis} : Exactly. Besides, they showed intent to destroy evidence before: I remember when they told the private media company they trusted with their sensitive emails to destroy the backups. Luckily, the company did not comply. It also shows how careful Clinton was of her emails, as she forfeited full control of them over to a private company who disobeyed her.', '>>{counters} : > So I feel that they deliberately did do such a thing, What you *feel* is irrelevant to the cold, hard fact of whether or not they committed wrongdoing. If you expect anyone to take your "feels" seriously, then you need to offer evidence to back up your assertion. And let\'s be very, **very** clear: Trump\'s surrogate *did not offer any such evidence.* He used innuendo to *suggest* malfeasance. But, because you *feel* that Hillary is a not-nice-very-bad-person, that\'s apparently more than enough to convict her in the court of your internal dialogue. This is the core of everything that is fundamentally wrong with discourse in American politics.', ">>{counters} : > So the fact that they did this after subpoenas were issued is insignificant? Fascinating. There is no evidence they destroyed phones *after subpoenas were issued.* That's the innuendo that the Trump surrogate was tacitly asserting. What we know - what **the FBI knew during the course of their investigation** - was that Clinton's staff, as standard operating procedure, physically destroyed her unused, out-dated cell phones. No one has made the explicit allegation that they did this *while the investigation was active.* That's the whole point of my comment.", ">>{Stinsudamus} : Feel, believe, trust, have faith, ascertain without all the information. Use whatever word you want. I return to the Invisible Pink Unicorn statement. You can't prove he doesn't exist, or that I'm lying. You trust her that she isn't lying, I do not. And yes, negative Hillary comment means trump must be mentioned. You know exactly what we are talking about, and now YOU are misdirecting. Whatever man, like I said, this conversation was already over.", ">>{imavgatbest} : you haven't read anything...that, or you ignored all the pertinent info. here is a nice timeline - you may try to discredit the source, but they lay out the timeline as it relates to the FBI report...she received the subpoena March 4, 2015...records deleted well after that. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-02/fbi-report-shows-how-bleachbit-deleted-hillary-clintons-oh-shit-moment", '>>{iamjacksprofile} : Did they swallow the pieces when they were done?', '>>{Lesilly81} : There is the reality though that subpoenas did exist for that offices information. So undoubtedly, they destroyed subpoenaed evidence.', ">>{counters} : Subpoenas or FOIA requests? They're two different things.", ">>{counters} : > here is a nice timeline - you may try to discredit the source, but they lay out the timeline as it relates to the FBI report...she received the subpoena March 4, 2015...records deleted well after that. I don't have to discredit the source, because your non-sequitor has *nothing to do with the issue of destroyed cell phones.*", '>>{counters} : > You trust her that she isn\'t lying, I do not. Ok, do me a favor and step back from your last comment for a moment. Now, go back and read my first comment on the topic in the thread, [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/51ed86/fbi_clinton_staff_destroyed_devices_with_hammers/d7beha9). Ok. Done? Now, bear with me, this will only take 5 seconds, and I bet we\'ll land on the same page: In this case, we don\'t have to worry about "believing" Hillary, or whether not she lied about anything. In this situation, we\'re actually not even evaluating a claim made by Hillary. Instead, we\'re discussing the tactic that a Trump surrogate used in a CNN interview to levy a serious accusation of criminal wrongdoing against Clinton. In that tactic, the surrogate asserted that the FBI found that in the past, Hillary\'s staff has physically destroyed cell phones which she was no longer using to handle her communications. This fact was confirmed by a reporter that CNN had on the line who was vetting information based on this FBI release. Now, the context of that information is really important. If the report was able to validate it, then that means this bit of information is contained in the FBI\'s interview notes. In other words - *they already knew about the practice of destroying cell phones* during the course of their investigation. But that\'s not the subtle spin that the Trump surrogate put on things. Instead, he **implied** that the cell phones were destroyed during the course of the FBI investigation. But **all** of the evidence points to this only occurring *before* the FBI investigations began. The Trump surrogate is being disingenuous; he\'s alleging that Clinton committed a serious criminal act - hampering a federal investigation by destroying evidence - when that is explicitly and objectively **not** what the CNN reporter was confirming. Does that make sense? There\'s no room for "feeling" or "belief" here. The Trump surrogate used an underhanded debate tactic and his counterpart wasn\'t afforded the opportunity to rebut, nor was the CNN reporter. --- > I return to the Invisible Pink Unicorn statement. [Dude, you\'re not the first person to ponder epistemology](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot). At least use the original formulation by Russell instead of an immature parody.', ">>{robfloyd} : They're both evidence being destroyed. Because we know she purposefully destroyed evidence in one case, we can assume cell phones were also destroyed for the same reason. Unless you would like to give her the benefit of the doubt and pretend she wouldn't do it again and again.", '>>{Stinsudamus} : Destroying evidence, even prior to an investigation as one would do with minor bit of foresight, is still illegal. Especially when there are procedures in place for the backup of such information prior to destruction of the physical device. I don\'t think she cackled out "fuck the fbi and this device because it has evidence on it!". It was a wholesale, across mediums, destruction of information that could potentially be used against her or her "administration" in the future. Shredded papers, deleted emails, hammerd phones, etc. All of that would and should have been backed up for FOIA, if say she used the government systems she was supposed to, or had at least let them handle the destruction as per policy. If you understood what I meant enough to pedantically demand I use the original version than what I said was sufficient to put the point across and you understood what I meant. It serves no purpose but to try and discredit me or what I am saying. This conversation is going no where, but technicality land. Good day, good luck, and good riddance.', '>>{counters} : > This conversation is going no where, but technicality land. Well, when you insist on chasing red herring and inventing distractions from the actual issue at hand, does this really surprise you? Please take your sophistry somewhere else.', ">>{counters} : > we can assume cell phones were also destroyed for the same reason. So in other words... you're alleging that Hillary Clinton possesses the power of pre-cognition and can see the future? How else would she have known to destroy cell phones in 2010 that the FBI might be interested in looking at during an investigation in 2016? A far more likely explanation than your conspiracy/superhero theory derives from [Hanlon's Razor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor). We already know that Clinton isn't sophisticated when it comes to technology. It's reasonable to assume she was unfamiliar with the proper means - or State Department mandated means - to dispose of unused electronics equipment, and simply had it done in a manner that was most convenient to her.", ">>{robfloyd} : She would have known to destroy them because they are full of illegal corruption that would get her in trouble. Try Occam's Razor on for size.", '>>{counters} : > Try Occam\'s Razor on for size. How is it parsimonious to assume that a device *you have never seen the contents of* must contain evidence of "illegal corruption," especially in light of the fact that there has surfaced - despite **decades** of concerted investigation by partisans - a grand total of **ZERO** evidence in any form of such corruption? C\'mon dude. Really?', '>>{rcglinsk} : I have a hard time understanding the mentality of these folks. Obviously they knew what to do with the old blackberry or whatever was an issue. Wouldn\'t normal people ask someone in the State Department what the proper procedure was? Up and deciding "I guess we\'ll smash the SIM card with a hammer" just seems really, really weird.', ">>{communistcrashdummy} : Unless they could prove without a doubt that the flash memory and cpu were destroyed with the hammer I don't buy it.", '>>{hessians4hire} : Because we all know destroying old mobile devices erases emails. /s', ">>{KageJittai} : No, no, you don't understand. She put the device under a cloth, then hit it with a hammer. It's simply a very aggressive 'wipe down'.", ">>{KageJittai} : Wasn't she under a congressional investigation when all of this happened, though?", ">>{robfloyd} : No, you're right. I should not allow her previous corruption influence my judgement of separate incidents. Why would I do such a thing?", '>>{counters} : If you have **evidence** of "previous corruption", then you can absolutely use that to inform your judgment. The problem is that you *don\'t* have such evidence.', '>>{counters} : Can you identify for us the pertinent parts of the legal code which make it impermissible to dispose of used, has-been-replaced cell phones while under a Congressional investigation? I think you\'ll find, in your search, that a "Congressional investigation" isn\'t any form of real "investigation." In fact, such "investigations" are just political theater without any true legal bearings - although the information they produce could be used in future prosecution or investigations. You may wish to [read this page about investigations undertaken by the Senate](http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Investigations.htm). But on another note, this is the whole problem with what the surrogate implied. His **innuendo** has set off an avalanche of commentators trying to define the terms under which such heinous actions as disposing of a cell-phone could constitute criminal wrong-doing, totally irrelevant of *when the disposal actually occurred*. And, most importantly - **the FBI already knew of the phone disposals during their prove.** They\'ve already vetted the significance of these actions, and we know what their assessment of their significance was. Look, if the story told in OP\'s link was that "Hillary failed to dispose of old cell phones, keeping them locked in her desk", the story *du jour* would be "ZOMG HILLARY LEFT DEVICE WITH TOP SECRET INFO LAYING AROUND HER OFFICE IMPEEEAAACCCHHH!!!!"', '>>{robfloyd} : The newly released emails contain evidence she is reckless and careless with state secrets in an age where cybersecurity is of utmost importance.', '>>{counters} : And still, that has **nothing** to do with the insinuation in the linked CNN segment that she ordered her staff to destroy evidence, hampering a federal investigation.', ">>{KageJittai} : This is the underlying problem with Hillary, and most politicians, and apparently the people who support them. And why I can't support them. Legal != Moral. Just because you didn't break any laws, doesn't mean you aren't shitty person.", '>>{counters} : Actually, the problem is people who share your jaded, hyper-cynical attitude. The reality is that in this case - as it almost *always* is, whether it\'s a scandal involving Hillary or another politician - you\'ve already long since decided that she\'s guilty and untrustworthy, and you\'ll bend over backwards to incorporate any new information to reinforce that perception. What you don\'t understand is that such a viewpoint doesn\'t lend you a position of strength - instead, it is extremely weak. You\'ve been left vulnerable to *exactly* the tactic that the Trump surrogate in the linked CNN clip: an innuendo and vague, farcical assertion of wrong-doing. But since you\'ve already decided that Hillary is not only a bad person, but a corrupt, immoral leech upon society, you don\'t critically assess the facts of the matter. You accept the innuendo at face value. And you refuse to actually sit down and check whether or not there\'s any veracity to the claim, instead bragging about how you\'re "above" these sorts of petty, corrupt politics. In reality, **you** are the exact reason these tactics are so effective. You\'re a pawn in the game that this surrogate is playing. Because you\'ll accept at face value anything which confirms your pre-conception that Hillary is a criminal, you\'ll turn around and repeat this innuendo matter-of-factly, giving legs to a false rumor that was generated off the cuff. And then another person with your warped worldview will hear it, and spread it. And pretty, soon it will "established" fact that Hillary *personally* destroyed old phones in order to hamper the FBI\'s investigation into her email servers. Do you really not see the role you\'re playing in this cycle? The saddest thing is that it would take you virtually no effort at all to break the cycle. All you have to do is take 10 seconds, realize the hyperbole and innuendo the surrogate is spreading, and say to yourself, "Hold on - I really dislike Hillary, and she\'ll never have my vote, but *this*? This is **obviously** BS, and I\'d prefer squashing BS and prosecuting Hillary for her many other very real flaws." But we all know that you won\'t do that.', ">>{KageJittai} : There is plenty of BS around Hillary, Watergate or Benghazi for example, or even her 'illness' as Karl Rove likes to proclaim. But there is also plenty she has brought on herself. She lies to and tries to cover up any wrong doings instead of owning her own shit. She knew she was under a congressional investigation, yet she deleted and destroyed many work related emails, unless you didn't read/believe the FBI report that they recovered [17,000 emails that Clinton failed to hand over to the State Department](http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/03/opinions/fbi-report-on-clinton-opinion-cox/). So let's recap: * Setups private email server for apparently no reason at all (since the reason she gave, to use a single device, was a total lie) * In the middle of a congressional investigation, deletes tens of thousands of emails which she determined to be unrelated to work (despite the FBI later determined over half of them were work related) * In the middle of a congressional investigation, smashes data storage devices with hammers, again failing to follow ANY record handling procedures. Listen, I don't know what is or isn't in these emails. I don't know if what she did was legal or not, it certainly seems like it should be illegal. Regardless, it is certainly a **pattern** of failing to properly handle records and data. And is dubious at best. She said all along she intended to cooperate with the congressional investigation, while deleting, screening and destroying data that might or might not be relevant. This isn't the behavior of someone who is cooperating, it's the behavior of someone who is trying to hide shit. You can disagree and believe this is all perfectly normal. Or maybe you think it's just bad judgement. Either it's bad judgement or it's something more. Either way, I can't support someone like that.", ">>{counters} : None of that has **anything** to do with the allegation in OP's link that she deliberately had her staff destroy cell phones in order to hamper a federal FBI investigation. Why are you seemingly incapable of judging the allegation - and its total lack of supporting evidence - on its own merits?", '>>{KageJittai} : I don\'t know, why do you believe everything she does is completely defensible? BTW, I have judged this on it\'s own merits. And I have judged it to be part of a continued pattern with Hillary. A pattern that she thinks what ever is on her damn servers/phones/whatever is so goddamn important that she can\'t follow protocols. > Is that a "best practice" for disabling and destroying devices which may have been used for sensitive communications? No, and the State Department almost certainly has guidelines on the proper methods to use. You even admitted early that you doubted this follows guidelines. ALL of these things are relevant because they show a continued pattern of behavior. * Use of private email server. Didn\'t follow state department guide lines and not a wise course of action. * Deletion of work related emails. Didn\'t follow state department or FOIA guidelines and laws. * Destruction of work related cellular devices. Didn\'t follow state department guidelines (in your own words). Why are you not able to see an obvious pattern of skittering around guidelines and laws. Even if they what she did wasn\'t explicitly illegal, it certainly isn\'t someone of strong judgement and character would do. I work in fucking IT and I wouldn\'t even think about setting up a personal email server in my home to handle sensitive information (and I have ran my own email servers before, just FYI). Why someone who isn\'t a techie would even have that thought? "Hmmm, you know what would be a good idea? Instead of depending on experts at a secure fallacy who have oversight and redundancy, I think this is a great DIY project, it\'ll be fun." No rational human would ever have that thought. Not unless they **really** want to control their information (which is actually information that belongs to the government, BTW). When it comes to destroying the phones. Who sits there and thinks: "You know, instead of turning these over to a professionally to have them properly disposed of, Ill just smash it with a hammer." WHO THINKS THAT!?! Not only is it a bad practice it\'s potentially dangerous, just in case you\'ve never cracked open a lithium-ion battery, they fucking catch fire and explode. So yes, I have judged her actions on their merits, and I find them baffling and stupid. If one of our employees at work tried setting up their own email server to use for work stuff, we\'d fucking fire them. If an employee at my job, instead of turning in their cell phone, smashed them with a hammer, we\'d fucking fire them. So as an IT professional. Would I hire someone who circumvents company protocol, destroys company data, and company property. No, I wouldn\'t hire someone like that. How can I even start to vote someone into the highest position in the country that I wouldn\'t even hire as an office worker?', ">>{robfloyd} : Listen they're not supposed to use hammers it's extremely easy for spies to obtain that data if not completely incinerated either way she dgaf about security of Intel because she's too busy charging half a mil for a speech", '>>{counters} : > I don\'t know, why do you believe everything she does is completely defensible? In this thread, I haven\'t commented on anything except for the current allegation. So, again, why the insistence on trying to jump to other topics? There is no "pattern" of relevance here, despite your impressively meandering attempts to construct one. The **only** questions you should be asking, if you\'re approaching this honestly, are related to the destruction of the outdated cell phones. Of prime importance, then, is one master question: *When* were the cell phones destroyed? We know the answer to that one: during her normal tenure as Secretary of State. Before the FBI investigation. Before even the Benghazi hearings. How do we know this? *Because the FBI explicitly asked her about this practice in their interview with over the July 4th holiday this year.* How do we know *that*? **Because the first we, the public, are hearing about this \'scandal\' is in the released notes from that interview!** Again, and I **cannot believe** I still have to explicitly write it out here: the allegation we\'re vetting is the innuendo made by the Trump surrogate in OP\'s link, that Hillary ordered the phones deleted in order to hamper the federal investigation into her e-mail servers. Last I checked, time travel was science fiction, so I fail to see how one could choose to obstruct an ongoing investigation by dispose of cell phones **6 years before the investigation ever began.** So, one last time: **Why are you bending over backwards to not reject this obvious false claim?** If you can\'t answer that honestly, then not only are we done here, but I think you have some serious soul-searching to do.', ">>{counters} : The insinuation by the Trump surrogate in the linked CNN segment isn't that the means of destruction were inadequate. It's that they were destroyed while the FBI's probe was ongoing in a deliberate attempt at obstruction. I'll remind you that she left the office of Secretary of State **three full years before the probe began**, and the phones were destroyed during here tenure.", ">>{KageJittai} : > Why are you bending over backwards to not reject this obvious false claim? The claim that she did it to avoid the FBI investigate is false. The fact she smashed government property and government data to bits for the funnies, isn't.", ">>{counters} : > The claim that she did it to avoid the FBI investigate is false. Why wasn't this your instantaneous reaction to the Trump surrogate's innuendo?", '>>{KageJittai} : It was. You pointed out that this didn\'t happen while she was under the FBI investigation: > ..patently false insinuation that the phones were destroyed deliberately to hamper an FBI investigation. --------------- I then asked the very simple question: > Wasn\'t she under a congressional investigation when all of this happened, though? --------------- To which you started to reply that this doesn\'t count as obstruction to justice, because congress doesn\'t have any real investigator powers: > Can you identify for us the pertinent parts of the legal code which make it impermissible to dispose of used, has-been-replaced cell phones while under a Congressional investigation? I think you\'ll find, in your search, that a "Congressional investigation" isn\'t any form of real "investigation." In fact, such "investigations" are just political theater without any true legal bearings - although the information they produce could be used in future prosecution or investigations. --------------- I took that as a yes to the question I had asked. I would had expected you to say something to the order of "No, they were destroyed before the congressional interviews began." I then began to state that I don\'t judge the rightness/wrongness of actions based off it is legal or not. > Just because you didn\'t break any laws, doesn\'t mean you aren\'t shitty person. --------------- After that we were off to the horse races when you started to claim that I was the fundamental problem with this country: > You\'re a pawn in the game that this surrogate is playing. Because you\'ll accept at face value anything which confirms your pre-conception that Hillary is a criminal, you\'ll turn around and repeat this innuendo matter-of-factly, giving legs to a false rumor that was generated off the cuff. --------------- I pointed out that I acknowledge many of these attacks are bullshit: > There is plenty of BS around Hillary, Watergate or Benghazi for example, or even her \'illness\' as Karl Rove likes to proclaim. But I also point to specific examples (including this one), where Hillary has shown less the stellar judgement. And while I acknowledged none of it might had been illegal, it did concern me. --------------- The conversation continues with me continually pointing to actions she and the people around her has taken that baffle me. You continue to berate me and question my motives after I have laid them out. I admit I might had been mistaken your intent/information when you replied to my question when I asked if these had taken place during the congressional investigations. But short of that, I don\'t see why you have any problem with my other concerns. I believe destruction of phones that contain critical information should be followed via protocol, and I highly doubt that protocol includes smashing them with a hammer. I see this as a long line of failure to follow guidelines and proper procedures. And I question why these weren\'t followed. Best case, it was because she was ignorant and/or not trained on these procedures. Middle case, is that she lacked good judgement. Worst case, there were more nefarious reasons why she was not following guidelines. Any of these cases give me cause for concern. The truth is: we don\'t know why she continued to fail to follow proper guidelines for handling of classified information, and likely will never know. --------------- And yes, it is a pattern. If this had been the only incident I likely wouldn\'t had cared she smashed phones with hammers when she was done with it. But these issues don\'t live in a bubble, and I don\'t make choices on who I vote for on singular issues. This is another straw on the camels back as far as I\'m concerned. How many times are we suppose to give her a free pass for breaking rules and regulations. I admit that smashing a government phone with a hammer is nowhere near as bad as running a private email server, but doing both only compounds my questions about her beliefs regarding how she saw her data. I also suggest you listen to people you converse with more.', '>>{counters} : I was looking forward to your response, but imagine my dismay when two sentences in, you offer this as evidence of your supposed good faith: > Wasn\'t she under a congressional investigation when all of this happened, though? Do you know what a leading question is? Your rhetorical dud was met with an appropriate response. There are far more honest ways to ask the question, "When were the phones destroyed?" The problem is, that\'s not what you were interested in. Hence the rest of my comments aimed at you, your motive, and its problem in the greater context of our political discourse. Look, your tactic was transparent, and you got called out on it. Don\'t pretend anything else happened. > I also suggest you listen to people you converse with more. If that ain\'t the pot calling the kettle, I don\'t know what is.', ">>{KageJittai} : Sorry if you thought I was implying she was under congressional investigation. You only discussed the FBI investigation and I was curious about the congressional investigations as well and thought she might had been. I also have asberbergers and don't always phrase my statements in the best manor. So that might be worth mentioning. Ill try better in the future."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{NerdyRomantic} : Donald Trump Rally Breaks Elton John's Attendance Record At River City Arena", '>>{CarmineFields} : How many fire marshals did Donnie have to attack?', '>>{ShroudedSciuridae} : He was African American, so just the one.', '>>{redgrass40} : Whelp I guess that about wraps it up. Go home everyone; Trump has won the election.', '>>{HIGHx1000000NRG} : How to be politically incorrect at a Trump rally: hold up a pocket sized copy of the US constitution.', '>>{Deofol7} : Well it is over. Polls are wrong. He had people at a rally. Pack it in guys. Why even post?', ">>{because_im_boring} : It's funny how different the tone of reporting was back when no one knew anything about him.", '>>{TrumpOnLolitaExpress} : The Dane Cook of politics. Says stupid words, does whacky movements, quickly fades away after he steals material from those before him.', '>>{majestic_wolf_fangs} : can\'t wait for the polls to flip to Trumps favor so we can hear why they\'re "meaningless".', ">>{HanMaBoogie} : The Dane Cook of politics. Ouch. Trump will only screw up the economy and set back American diplomacy by decades. He's not Dane Cook bad.", '>>{Deofol7} : Polls for president are meaningful when viewed in aggregate on an electoral map. Those have pretty much been for Hillary since day one', '>>{stupid-rando} : Point taken, but there is the issue about the nuke codes. Dane Cook was a disaster, but we still have comedy after Dane Cook.', '>>{du44} : I asked the same thing when people were shitposting the same thing about Sanders, and I got downvoted to hell.', ">>{stupid-rando} : I've been on a Netflix comedy binge: Aziz, Bill Burr, Bill Maher, Hannibal Buress, Jim Jefferies, Jim Gaffigan, Tom Segura..."], [">>{classic_douche} : It's nice how facts aren't enough to slow down their partisan bickering.", '>>{ItsSing} : She already said she used a cloth to wipe everything, stop spreading bad rumors.', '>>{arcxa} : Clinton is a drug dealer looking at her tactics. Stronger to-get-her (in jail)!', '>>{hearthneewb} : Even as a criminal the Clinton-Kaine ticket is stronger than Trump. Or did you forget Kaine was on the ticket so having Hillary unable to do the job is barely an issue?', '>>{arcxa} : Kaine? This one is quite cheap to bought.', ">>{hearthneewb} : I'd rather a bought man than one who hates LGBT folk is against contraception and hates women's rights without being bought.", ">>{arcxa} : Trump never said anything bad about LGBT community. And nothing about hating women's rights. Also never heard about contraception stuff, source. But thanks for admiting that Hilldawg is a criminal and Kaine is bought.", '>>{hearthneewb} : I was referring to Pence a piece of human garbage and why no sane person should ever vote for Trump. As for Kaine being bought literally every politician has claimed expenses. Hardly an issue unless you want to be dishonest and ignore everyone else (including again Pence).', '>>{arcxa} : Pence is not at the top of the ticket, calling shots. Frankly Pence and Kaine are both irrelevant.', '>>{hearthneewb} : Except no because the VP actually has to do stuff and fill in. Remember how much cheney was in charge? Remember how much Biden has done? VP are just as important but I can understand ignoring them if you had Pence on your side.', '>>{arcxa} : I can understand why making a big deal of VPs if you have a Hillary on your side. Oaf better than crook.', ">>{hearthneewb} : No I pretty strongly disagree with that. I'd rather a competent criminal than a oaf.", '>>{hearthneewb} : Her approval rating prior to running would kind of disagree with that', '>>{arcxa} : Prior to running meaning before all shit hitted the fan.', '>>{hearthneewb} : you forget the 30 years of mudslinging she has faced? When in office she works efficiently and pretty well respected. its when she campaigns she gets hated', '>>{arcxa} : Never attack your enemies when they are at their strongest.', '>>{hearthneewb} : So yeah lets just ignore all the good she has done and how none of the attacks against her has ever stuck.', ">>{hearthneewb} : http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/09/carly-fiorina-debate-hillary-clintons-greatest-accomplishment-213157 Maybe actually research candidates before saying shit like that. Real talk what good has TRUMP done? Because he's pretty much only fucked people over as a businessman.", '>>{hearthneewb} : but votes for it despite his own personal beliefs. AKA what a politician should be doing.', '>>{arcxa} : Speeches and participation trophies. Trump from the top of my head turned millions into billions.', '>>{not_a_throwaway23} : Destruction of evidence. Only a crime when the lower-classes do it.', ">>{not_a_throwaway23} : >Even as a criminal the Clinton-Kaine ticket is stronger than Trump. Or did you forget Kaine was on the ticket so having Hillary unable to do the job is barely an issue? Good point. She's clearly dying, so we should look hard at what a President Kaine would be like for the US.", '>>{not_a_throwaway23} : Yes, throwing out your personal convictions in exchange for money and power is exactly what a politician "should be doing."', ">>{SandraLee48} : Clinton advocate back on his heels trying to defend her. Resorts to accusing Trump instead of offering a plausible explanation for Clinton's actions.", ">>{SandraLee48} : When you have to go negative on your opponent to make the case for your candidate you're in a weak position.", '>>{hearthneewb} : A politician should be nothing more than a voice of the people. If the people are anti abortion it doesn\'t matter what they believe they should also be anti abortion. I know this is a hard concept to grasp but Republicans really do seem to like "sticking on an issue" no matter how abhorrent that position is', '>>{hearthneewb} : When you\'re buying a new table do you go "Hmmm that table has only 1 mark so its worthless and that table has 18 marks so its also worthless" or do you go "Oh this table only has 1 mark its clearly superior to the table with 18 and there doesn\'t seem to be any with 0 marks".', '>>{not_a_throwaway23} : I see. Then I guess it would be best if we get rid of politicians and just vote on everything ourselves. Mob rule always works out for the best.', ">>{Lurial} : No intent I didn't intend to destroy multiple devices with a hammer i swear!", '>>{JohnnyRandazzo} : some would argue that his stance has changed on the issue for political reasons. he voted in support of the pro life license plates that the money goes towards a group that fights against abortions.', ">>{hearthneewb} : Thats expensive and costly hell this election alone is way too much money and honestly not worth the hassle. You elect people and have them carry out their proposed policies it doesn't matter what they believe only what they plan to do", '>>{SandraLee48} : IMO Clinton is a well marked table, as is Trump.', ">>{linguotgr} : Maybe there was a spider on the phones and they were just smashing the spiders. You can't prove that's not what happened.", '>>{counters} : The innuendo being spread here - that the staff destroyed the devices **during the FBI investigation** in order to destroy evidence - is entirely unsubstantiated. Perez merely confirms that SOP was to physically destroy Clinton\'s outdated devices as practice. Is that a "best practice" for disabling and destroying devices which may have been used for sensitive communications? No, and the State Department almost certainly has guidelines on the proper methods to use. But this is all stuff that the FBI knew and took it into account when evaluating Clinton\'s actions as Secretary of State. There isn\'t anything new here, except for the patently false insinuation that the phones were destroyed *deliberately to hamper an FBI investigation.*', ">>{00chris00} : Don't be retarded, everybody knows you can only kill spiders with fire", ">>{wavescrashover} : Thank you! It's almost as if most of the people criticizing her/them for this didn't even bother to read through the FBI briefing.", '>>{Stinsudamus} : I read it. They said they can\'t prove she or her staff did it deliberately. To the point of saying if it was not deliberate, and if they did not know that their handling, dissemination, and destruction of classified information broached policy they were all briefed on at some point then it was being "inept" if they did it by accident rather than purposefully. Benefit of the doubt and all that... But going off of sop to destroy devices in your way and not letting the government make backups like they are supposed to, among the many other aspects of this... It does cast a little doubt on their intentions.', '>>{adamlh} : Can we get a fact check on that? ~ best part of the whole video.', ">>{counters} : Well, no, you've glossed over an important detail. If Clinton's phones were *routinely* destroyed once they were no longer in use, and all of this occurred **before the investigations began**, then there is nothing new and noteworthy here. You need to establish that this practice continued *after* the investigations began, and even then, you won't be able to argue that they **deliberately** destroyed them to hamper the investigation unless you can offer evidence that documents this motive.", ">>{PogotowieAlkoholowe} : Uhh except that you aren't buying tables. A more accurate analogy would be, oh this doctor has only had 10 malpractice suits while this other one has had 50. It's a shit situation all around.", '>>{Stinsudamus} : That\'s the key component here. No official investigation came to the determination that they didn\'t deliberately do it. Only that they couldn\'t prove intent. With the sniper fire, amongst many many other lies her and her campaign has told both before, during, and after the investigation... Some people feel like maybe they wouldn\'t tell the truth since that would land them in jail. Maybe... Just maybe... With hours of "I do not recall" from various people among various investigations about details they absolutely should know... Maybe that makes em seem a little like they might be lying. Just maybe. Whatever though, I\'m sure there is not a shred of doubt about this for you. Fine enough. I have some doubts over their honesty though, and no amount of legal strategy makes a misdirecting-non answer that\'s given over and over across multiple investigations and many many people look "transparent and honest"', ">>{fat_osvaldo} : Yeah it's terrible spin on this talking point. The more relevant one is how the email archive devices were lost in the mail which is far more shady imo but doesn't generate buzz like this does.", ">>{IslamicShibe} : It's interesting this was released on a Friday before Labor Day weekend. Only makes me want to vote for Trump more...", '>>{counters} : We\'re not talking about "intent" or "sniper fire" or anything else. The topic here is singular and based on a very specific allegation: *did Clinton\'s staff deliberately destroy cell phones in lieu of handing them over as evidence in the FBI\'s investigation into Clinton\'s e-mail server?* That\'s the innuendo here. And that would be a really bad, egregious thing - if it were True, and there was evidence that Clinton ordered the cell phones to be destroyed, she would be going to federal prison for deliberately obstructing an FBI investigation. But it\'s *entirely, 100% unsubstantiated innuendo*. Instead, what **actually** happened is that long before the investigations ever began, it was SoP for Hillary\'s staff to dispose of her out-of-date or otherwise replaced cell phones by physically destroying them. That\'s clearly not the best way to dispose of them, and the State Department almost certainly has an approved process that should\'ve been followed. But this is something that the FBI **CLEARLY** knew about, since we\'re learning about it *from the release of their own investigation and interview notes.* There was no wrong-doing. The innuendo is a bald-faced lie. Don\'t try to change the topic; either *be honest* and criticize and obvious lie and smear, or remain silent. But sometimes remaining silent speaks the loudest about ones\' character.', '>>{Stinsudamus} : Ok. So I feel that they deliberately did do such a thing, both prior to and during the investigation. As such as you mention that the state department has different procedures in place, and ones that include backups. The only contention here is that they say they didn\'t do this on purpose to hinder the fbi. I feel as if they did. The only evidence they are lying would come from them telling the truth about lying. I don\'t think that\'s gonna happen. They have lost the benefit of the doubt with me, and need to prove hey are on the up and up. The sniper fire and all the other lies are not directly tied to this, except that it shows character and willingness to lie. Sometimes actually typing out a response to the comment rather than copy and pasting large sections says a lot about someone\'s character as well since you broached that topic. I already know the "there is no evidence" line that\'s coming, and that correct. At this point it\'s down to telling the truth, something both her and her campaign has not done many many times... And I feel establishes the pattern. You don\'t. We don\'t need to discuss it further than the invisible pink unicorn I hang out with. Because I\'m telling the truth, and you have no proof otherwise.', '>>{imavgatbest} : So the fact that they did this after subpoenas were issued is insignificant? Fascinating.', '>>{whyReadThis} : Exactly. Besides, they showed intent to destroy evidence before: I remember when they told the private media company they trusted with their sensitive emails to destroy the backups. Luckily, the company did not comply. It also shows how careful Clinton was of her emails, as she forfeited full control of them over to a private company who disobeyed her.', '>>{counters} : > So I feel that they deliberately did do such a thing, What you *feel* is irrelevant to the cold, hard fact of whether or not they committed wrongdoing. If you expect anyone to take your "feels" seriously, then you need to offer evidence to back up your assertion. And let\'s be very, **very** clear: Trump\'s surrogate *did not offer any such evidence.* He used innuendo to *suggest* malfeasance. But, because you *feel* that Hillary is a not-nice-very-bad-person, that\'s apparently more than enough to convict her in the court of your internal dialogue. This is the core of everything that is fundamentally wrong with discourse in American politics.', ">>{counters} : > So the fact that they did this after subpoenas were issued is insignificant? Fascinating. There is no evidence they destroyed phones *after subpoenas were issued.* That's the innuendo that the Trump surrogate was tacitly asserting. What we know - what **the FBI knew during the course of their investigation** - was that Clinton's staff, as standard operating procedure, physically destroyed her unused, out-dated cell phones. No one has made the explicit allegation that they did this *while the investigation was active.* That's the whole point of my comment.", ">>{Stinsudamus} : Feel, believe, trust, have faith, ascertain without all the information. Use whatever word you want. I return to the Invisible Pink Unicorn statement. You can't prove he doesn't exist, or that I'm lying. You trust her that she isn't lying, I do not. And yes, negative Hillary comment means trump must be mentioned. You know exactly what we are talking about, and now YOU are misdirecting. Whatever man, like I said, this conversation was already over.", ">>{imavgatbest} : you haven't read anything...that, or you ignored all the pertinent info. here is a nice timeline - you may try to discredit the source, but they lay out the timeline as it relates to the FBI report...she received the subpoena March 4, 2015...records deleted well after that. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-02/fbi-report-shows-how-bleachbit-deleted-hillary-clintons-oh-shit-moment", '>>{iamjacksprofile} : Did they swallow the pieces when they were done?', '>>{Lesilly81} : There is the reality though that subpoenas did exist for that offices information. So undoubtedly, they destroyed subpoenaed evidence.', ">>{counters} : Subpoenas or FOIA requests? They're two different things.", ">>{counters} : > here is a nice timeline - you may try to discredit the source, but they lay out the timeline as it relates to the FBI report...she received the subpoena March 4, 2015...records deleted well after that. I don't have to discredit the source, because your non-sequitor has *nothing to do with the issue of destroyed cell phones.*", '>>{counters} : > You trust her that she isn\'t lying, I do not. Ok, do me a favor and step back from your last comment for a moment. Now, go back and read my first comment on the topic in the thread, [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/51ed86/fbi_clinton_staff_destroyed_devices_with_hammers/d7beha9). Ok. Done? Now, bear with me, this will only take 5 seconds, and I bet we\'ll land on the same page: In this case, we don\'t have to worry about "believing" Hillary, or whether not she lied about anything. In this situation, we\'re actually not even evaluating a claim made by Hillary. Instead, we\'re discussing the tactic that a Trump surrogate used in a CNN interview to levy a serious accusation of criminal wrongdoing against Clinton. In that tactic, the surrogate asserted that the FBI found that in the past, Hillary\'s staff has physically destroyed cell phones which she was no longer using to handle her communications. This fact was confirmed by a reporter that CNN had on the line who was vetting information based on this FBI release. Now, the context of that information is really important. If the report was able to validate it, then that means this bit of information is contained in the FBI\'s interview notes. In other words - *they already knew about the practice of destroying cell phones* during the course of their investigation. But that\'s not the subtle spin that the Trump surrogate put on things. Instead, he **implied** that the cell phones were destroyed during the course of the FBI investigation. But **all** of the evidence points to this only occurring *before* the FBI investigations began. The Trump surrogate is being disingenuous; he\'s alleging that Clinton committed a serious criminal act - hampering a federal investigation by destroying evidence - when that is explicitly and objectively **not** what the CNN reporter was confirming. Does that make sense? There\'s no room for "feeling" or "belief" here. The Trump surrogate used an underhanded debate tactic and his counterpart wasn\'t afforded the opportunity to rebut, nor was the CNN reporter. --- > I return to the Invisible Pink Unicorn statement. [Dude, you\'re not the first person to ponder epistemology](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot). At least use the original formulation by Russell instead of an immature parody.', ">>{robfloyd} : They're both evidence being destroyed. Because we know she purposefully destroyed evidence in one case, we can assume cell phones were also destroyed for the same reason. Unless you would like to give her the benefit of the doubt and pretend she wouldn't do it again and again.", '>>{Stinsudamus} : Destroying evidence, even prior to an investigation as one would do with minor bit of foresight, is still illegal. Especially when there are procedures in place for the backup of such information prior to destruction of the physical device. I don\'t think she cackled out "fuck the fbi and this device because it has evidence on it!". It was a wholesale, across mediums, destruction of information that could potentially be used against her or her "administration" in the future. Shredded papers, deleted emails, hammerd phones, etc. All of that would and should have been backed up for FOIA, if say she used the government systems she was supposed to, or had at least let them handle the destruction as per policy. If you understood what I meant enough to pedantically demand I use the original version than what I said was sufficient to put the point across and you understood what I meant. It serves no purpose but to try and discredit me or what I am saying. This conversation is going no where, but technicality land. Good day, good luck, and good riddance.', '>>{counters} : > This conversation is going no where, but technicality land. Well, when you insist on chasing red herring and inventing distractions from the actual issue at hand, does this really surprise you? Please take your sophistry somewhere else.', ">>{counters} : > we can assume cell phones were also destroyed for the same reason. So in other words... you're alleging that Hillary Clinton possesses the power of pre-cognition and can see the future? How else would she have known to destroy cell phones in 2010 that the FBI might be interested in looking at during an investigation in 2016? A far more likely explanation than your conspiracy/superhero theory derives from [Hanlon's Razor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor). We already know that Clinton isn't sophisticated when it comes to technology. It's reasonable to assume she was unfamiliar with the proper means - or State Department mandated means - to dispose of unused electronics equipment, and simply had it done in a manner that was most convenient to her.", ">>{robfloyd} : She would have known to destroy them because they are full of illegal corruption that would get her in trouble. Try Occam's Razor on for size.", '>>{counters} : > Try Occam\'s Razor on for size. How is it parsimonious to assume that a device *you have never seen the contents of* must contain evidence of "illegal corruption," especially in light of the fact that there has surfaced - despite **decades** of concerted investigation by partisans - a grand total of **ZERO** evidence in any form of such corruption? C\'mon dude. Really?', '>>{rcglinsk} : I have a hard time understanding the mentality of these folks. Obviously they knew what to do with the old blackberry or whatever was an issue. Wouldn\'t normal people ask someone in the State Department what the proper procedure was? Up and deciding "I guess we\'ll smash the SIM card with a hammer" just seems really, really weird.', ">>{communistcrashdummy} : Unless they could prove without a doubt that the flash memory and cpu were destroyed with the hammer I don't buy it.", '>>{hessians4hire} : Because we all know destroying old mobile devices erases emails. /s', ">>{KageJittai} : No, no, you don't understand. She put the device under a cloth, then hit it with a hammer. It's simply a very aggressive 'wipe down'.", ">>{KageJittai} : Wasn't she under a congressional investigation when all of this happened, though?", ">>{robfloyd} : No, you're right. I should not allow her previous corruption influence my judgement of separate incidents. Why would I do such a thing?", '>>{counters} : If you have **evidence** of "previous corruption", then you can absolutely use that to inform your judgment. The problem is that you *don\'t* have such evidence.', '>>{counters} : Can you identify for us the pertinent parts of the legal code which make it impermissible to dispose of used, has-been-replaced cell phones while under a Congressional investigation? I think you\'ll find, in your search, that a "Congressional investigation" isn\'t any form of real "investigation." In fact, such "investigations" are just political theater without any true legal bearings - although the information they produce could be used in future prosecution or investigations. You may wish to [read this page about investigations undertaken by the Senate](http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Investigations.htm). But on another note, this is the whole problem with what the surrogate implied. His **innuendo** has set off an avalanche of commentators trying to define the terms under which such heinous actions as disposing of a cell-phone could constitute criminal wrong-doing, totally irrelevant of *when the disposal actually occurred*. And, most importantly - **the FBI already knew of the phone disposals during their prove.** They\'ve already vetted the significance of these actions, and we know what their assessment of their significance was. Look, if the story told in OP\'s link was that "Hillary failed to dispose of old cell phones, keeping them locked in her desk", the story *du jour* would be "ZOMG HILLARY LEFT DEVICE WITH TOP SECRET INFO LAYING AROUND HER OFFICE IMPEEEAAACCCHHH!!!!"', '>>{robfloyd} : The newly released emails contain evidence she is reckless and careless with state secrets in an age where cybersecurity is of utmost importance.', '>>{counters} : And still, that has **nothing** to do with the insinuation in the linked CNN segment that she ordered her staff to destroy evidence, hampering a federal investigation.', ">>{KageJittai} : This is the underlying problem with Hillary, and most politicians, and apparently the people who support them. And why I can't support them. Legal != Moral. Just because you didn't break any laws, doesn't mean you aren't shitty person.", '>>{counters} : Actually, the problem is people who share your jaded, hyper-cynical attitude. The reality is that in this case - as it almost *always* is, whether it\'s a scandal involving Hillary or another politician - you\'ve already long since decided that she\'s guilty and untrustworthy, and you\'ll bend over backwards to incorporate any new information to reinforce that perception. What you don\'t understand is that such a viewpoint doesn\'t lend you a position of strength - instead, it is extremely weak. You\'ve been left vulnerable to *exactly* the tactic that the Trump surrogate in the linked CNN clip: an innuendo and vague, farcical assertion of wrong-doing. But since you\'ve already decided that Hillary is not only a bad person, but a corrupt, immoral leech upon society, you don\'t critically assess the facts of the matter. You accept the innuendo at face value. And you refuse to actually sit down and check whether or not there\'s any veracity to the claim, instead bragging about how you\'re "above" these sorts of petty, corrupt politics. In reality, **you** are the exact reason these tactics are so effective. You\'re a pawn in the game that this surrogate is playing. Because you\'ll accept at face value anything which confirms your pre-conception that Hillary is a criminal, you\'ll turn around and repeat this innuendo matter-of-factly, giving legs to a false rumor that was generated off the cuff. And then another person with your warped worldview will hear it, and spread it. And pretty, soon it will "established" fact that Hillary *personally* destroyed old phones in order to hamper the FBI\'s investigation into her email servers. Do you really not see the role you\'re playing in this cycle? The saddest thing is that it would take you virtually no effort at all to break the cycle. All you have to do is take 10 seconds, realize the hyperbole and innuendo the surrogate is spreading, and say to yourself, "Hold on - I really dislike Hillary, and she\'ll never have my vote, but *this*? This is **obviously** BS, and I\'d prefer squashing BS and prosecuting Hillary for her many other very real flaws." But we all know that you won\'t do that.', ">>{KageJittai} : There is plenty of BS around Hillary, Watergate or Benghazi for example, or even her 'illness' as Karl Rove likes to proclaim. But there is also plenty she has brought on herself. She lies to and tries to cover up any wrong doings instead of owning her own shit. She knew she was under a congressional investigation, yet she deleted and destroyed many work related emails, unless you didn't read/believe the FBI report that they recovered [17,000 emails that Clinton failed to hand over to the State Department](http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/03/opinions/fbi-report-on-clinton-opinion-cox/). So let's recap: * Setups private email server for apparently no reason at all (since the reason she gave, to use a single device, was a total lie) * In the middle of a congressional investigation, deletes tens of thousands of emails which she determined to be unrelated to work (despite the FBI later determined over half of them were work related) * In the middle of a congressional investigation, smashes data storage devices with hammers, again failing to follow ANY record handling procedures. Listen, I don't know what is or isn't in these emails. I don't know if what she did was legal or not, it certainly seems like it should be illegal. Regardless, it is certainly a **pattern** of failing to properly handle records and data. And is dubious at best. She said all along she intended to cooperate with the congressional investigation, while deleting, screening and destroying data that might or might not be relevant. This isn't the behavior of someone who is cooperating, it's the behavior of someone who is trying to hide shit. You can disagree and believe this is all perfectly normal. Or maybe you think it's just bad judgement. Either it's bad judgement or it's something more. Either way, I can't support someone like that.", ">>{counters} : None of that has **anything** to do with the allegation in OP's link that she deliberately had her staff destroy cell phones in order to hamper a federal FBI investigation. Why are you seemingly incapable of judging the allegation - and its total lack of supporting evidence - on its own merits?", '>>{KageJittai} : I don\'t know, why do you believe everything she does is completely defensible? BTW, I have judged this on it\'s own merits. And I have judged it to be part of a continued pattern with Hillary. A pattern that she thinks what ever is on her damn servers/phones/whatever is so goddamn important that she can\'t follow protocols. > Is that a "best practice" for disabling and destroying devices which may have been used for sensitive communications? No, and the State Department almost certainly has guidelines on the proper methods to use. You even admitted early that you doubted this follows guidelines. ALL of these things are relevant because they show a continued pattern of behavior. * Use of private email server. Didn\'t follow state department guide lines and not a wise course of action. * Deletion of work related emails. Didn\'t follow state department or FOIA guidelines and laws. * Destruction of work related cellular devices. Didn\'t follow state department guidelines (in your own words). Why are you not able to see an obvious pattern of skittering around guidelines and laws. Even if they what she did wasn\'t explicitly illegal, it certainly isn\'t someone of strong judgement and character would do. I work in fucking IT and I wouldn\'t even think about setting up a personal email server in my home to handle sensitive information (and I have ran my own email servers before, just FYI). Why someone who isn\'t a techie would even have that thought? "Hmmm, you know what would be a good idea? Instead of depending on experts at a secure fallacy who have oversight and redundancy, I think this is a great DIY project, it\'ll be fun." No rational human would ever have that thought. Not unless they **really** want to control their information (which is actually information that belongs to the government, BTW). When it comes to destroying the phones. Who sits there and thinks: "You know, instead of turning these over to a professionally to have them properly disposed of, Ill just smash it with a hammer." WHO THINKS THAT!?! Not only is it a bad practice it\'s potentially dangerous, just in case you\'ve never cracked open a lithium-ion battery, they fucking catch fire and explode. So yes, I have judged her actions on their merits, and I find them baffling and stupid. If one of our employees at work tried setting up their own email server to use for work stuff, we\'d fucking fire them. If an employee at my job, instead of turning in their cell phone, smashed them with a hammer, we\'d fucking fire them. So as an IT professional. Would I hire someone who circumvents company protocol, destroys company data, and company property. No, I wouldn\'t hire someone like that. How can I even start to vote someone into the highest position in the country that I wouldn\'t even hire as an office worker?', ">>{robfloyd} : Listen they're not supposed to use hammers it's extremely easy for spies to obtain that data if not completely incinerated either way she dgaf about security of Intel because she's too busy charging half a mil for a speech", '>>{counters} : > I don\'t know, why do you believe everything she does is completely defensible? In this thread, I haven\'t commented on anything except for the current allegation. So, again, why the insistence on trying to jump to other topics? There is no "pattern" of relevance here, despite your impressively meandering attempts to construct one. The **only** questions you should be asking, if you\'re approaching this honestly, are related to the destruction of the outdated cell phones. Of prime importance, then, is one master question: *When* were the cell phones destroyed? We know the answer to that one: during her normal tenure as Secretary of State. Before the FBI investigation. Before even the Benghazi hearings. How do we know this? *Because the FBI explicitly asked her about this practice in their interview with over the July 4th holiday this year.* How do we know *that*? **Because the first we, the public, are hearing about this \'scandal\' is in the released notes from that interview!** Again, and I **cannot believe** I still have to explicitly write it out here: the allegation we\'re vetting is the innuendo made by the Trump surrogate in OP\'s link, that Hillary ordered the phones deleted in order to hamper the federal investigation into her e-mail servers. Last I checked, time travel was science fiction, so I fail to see how one could choose to obstruct an ongoing investigation by dispose of cell phones **6 years before the investigation ever began.** So, one last time: **Why are you bending over backwards to not reject this obvious false claim?** If you can\'t answer that honestly, then not only are we done here, but I think you have some serious soul-searching to do.', ">>{counters} : The insinuation by the Trump surrogate in the linked CNN segment isn't that the means of destruction were inadequate. It's that they were destroyed while the FBI's probe was ongoing in a deliberate attempt at obstruction. I'll remind you that she left the office of Secretary of State **three full years before the probe began**, and the phones were destroyed during here tenure.", ">>{KageJittai} : > Why are you bending over backwards to not reject this obvious false claim? The claim that she did it to avoid the FBI investigate is false. The fact she smashed government property and government data to bits for the funnies, isn't.", ">>{counters} : > The claim that she did it to avoid the FBI investigate is false. Why wasn't this your instantaneous reaction to the Trump surrogate's innuendo?", '>>{KageJittai} : It was. You pointed out that this didn\'t happen while she was under the FBI investigation: > ..patently false insinuation that the phones were destroyed deliberately to hamper an FBI investigation. --------------- I then asked the very simple question: > Wasn\'t she under a congressional investigation when all of this happened, though? --------------- To which you started to reply that this doesn\'t count as obstruction to justice, because congress doesn\'t have any real investigator powers: > Can you identify for us the pertinent parts of the legal code which make it impermissible to dispose of used, has-been-replaced cell phones while under a Congressional investigation? I think you\'ll find, in your search, that a "Congressional investigation" isn\'t any form of real "investigation." In fact, such "investigations" are just political theater without any true legal bearings - although the information they produce could be used in future prosecution or investigations. --------------- I took that as a yes to the question I had asked. I would had expected you to say something to the order of "No, they were destroyed before the congressional interviews began." I then began to state that I don\'t judge the rightness/wrongness of actions based off it is legal or not. > Just because you didn\'t break any laws, doesn\'t mean you aren\'t shitty person. --------------- After that we were off to the horse races when you started to claim that I was the fundamental problem with this country: > You\'re a pawn in the game that this surrogate is playing. Because you\'ll accept at face value anything which confirms your pre-conception that Hillary is a criminal, you\'ll turn around and repeat this innuendo matter-of-factly, giving legs to a false rumor that was generated off the cuff. --------------- I pointed out that I acknowledge many of these attacks are bullshit: > There is plenty of BS around Hillary, Watergate or Benghazi for example, or even her \'illness\' as Karl Rove likes to proclaim. But I also point to specific examples (including this one), where Hillary has shown less the stellar judgement. And while I acknowledged none of it might had been illegal, it did concern me. --------------- The conversation continues with me continually pointing to actions she and the people around her has taken that baffle me. You continue to berate me and question my motives after I have laid them out. I admit I might had been mistaken your intent/information when you replied to my question when I asked if these had taken place during the congressional investigations. But short of that, I don\'t see why you have any problem with my other concerns. I believe destruction of phones that contain critical information should be followed via protocol, and I highly doubt that protocol includes smashing them with a hammer. I see this as a long line of failure to follow guidelines and proper procedures. And I question why these weren\'t followed. Best case, it was because she was ignorant and/or not trained on these procedures. Middle case, is that she lacked good judgement. Worst case, there were more nefarious reasons why she was not following guidelines. Any of these cases give me cause for concern. The truth is: we don\'t know why she continued to fail to follow proper guidelines for handling of classified information, and likely will never know. --------------- And yes, it is a pattern. If this had been the only incident I likely wouldn\'t had cared she smashed phones with hammers when she was done with it. But these issues don\'t live in a bubble, and I don\'t make choices on who I vote for on singular issues. This is another straw on the camels back as far as I\'m concerned. How many times are we suppose to give her a free pass for breaking rules and regulations. I admit that smashing a government phone with a hammer is nowhere near as bad as running a private email server, but doing both only compounds my questions about her beliefs regarding how she saw her data. I also suggest you listen to people you converse with more.', '>>{counters} : I was looking forward to your response, but imagine my dismay when two sentences in, you offer this as evidence of your supposed good faith: > Wasn\'t she under a congressional investigation when all of this happened, though? Do you know what a leading question is? Your rhetorical dud was met with an appropriate response. There are far more honest ways to ask the question, "When were the phones destroyed?" The problem is, that\'s not what you were interested in. Hence the rest of my comments aimed at you, your motive, and its problem in the greater context of our political discourse. Look, your tactic was transparent, and you got called out on it. Don\'t pretend anything else happened. > I also suggest you listen to people you converse with more. If that ain\'t the pot calling the kettle, I don\'t know what is.', ">>{KageJittai} : Sorry if you thought I was implying she was under congressional investigation. You only discussed the FBI investigation and I was curious about the congressional investigations as well and thought she might had been. I also have asberbergers and don't always phrase my statements in the best manor. So that might be worth mentioning. Ill try better in the future."], ['>>{ryan924} : Joe Biden: Trump’s Attacks on Judge Are Racist, But ‘It’s Not the Racism That Frightens Me’', ">>{AngerMacFadden} : I bet he is frightened having to endure Clinton state of the union speeches. He should have faith, she'd probably deliver them via a giant killer robot anyhow.", ">>{KopOut} : He actually highlighted something in this speech that I don't think many people were aware Trump actually said. A very good point by Biden IMO.", '>>{BlueDogDem62} : Joe "You cannot go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin\' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I\'m not joking." Biden', ">>{Clay_Statue} : Personally it is his orange skin and tiny hands that are especially concerning. He holds a grape like it's an apple.", '>>{WhyIsThereSomething} : Since when is Mexico a race? Also, you know the judge is part of *La Raza* right? I assuming people know enough mexican to figure that one out?', '>>{Cupinacup} : The part of the Obama presidency I\'m gonna miss the most is the Onion\'s "Diamond Joe" Biden articles.', ">>{CcrLyaSrtIatLy} : Just step out on the balcony and fire off a couple blasts from a double-barrel shotgun. I hear that's the best way to get rid of bad guys.", ">>{GhostOfJebsCampaign} : Racism has now evolved to include nationality and religion as long as you're not White.", ">>{GhostOfJebsCampaign} : lol You can look right on the La Raza Judge's website and see it has National Council of La Raza listed as an affiliate.", '>>{ryan924} : Affiliates listed on La Raza Lawyers Association website: " Los Angeles Mexican American Bar Association San Francisco La Raza Lawyers San Diego La Raza Lawyers Santa Clara La Raza Lawyers Orange County Hispanic Bar Association Sacramento La Raza Lawyers Inland Empire LRLA Hispanic National Bar Association Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund California Bar Association Lawyer Referral Services by County"', ">>{whenfoom} : Biden is always frightened and sad. He's a Victorian namby-pamby.", '>>{ryan924} : If you clicked on the link, you would see that that org is not the hate group that Trump is trying to pretend it is', '>>{WhyIsThereSomething} : You mean the same org, that only offers subsidized housing to latinos? the same group that encourages illegal immigration? The same group that **helped give out fake SSNs and gave tutorials on how to fake your identity to get hired?**'], ['>>{ledhe} : Democrats: Whether You Like It Or Not, Here Is Your Purity Test', ">>{DickButtwoman} : >Questions 1: Do you resolve to serve as a representative with a sober understanding of the harm the DNC has caused millions of Americans? Buy into our narrative about the last election about Bernie being completely slighted or you're not progressive enough? This sounds like a 10 year old wrote this.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Yeah. It's pretty amateur. That being said, there is some truth to the democrats not having learned anything at all from the last election. This just isn't the way to go about it.", ">>{dam_3} : Did the DNC take everyone's lunch money or something?", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : We're looking 4 months after an election. Even the Tea Party's Come to Jesus concentration took almost a year to build. The party isn't going to change overnight.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : The steps they have taken so far aren't encouraging.", ">>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : The only step so far is DNC Chair, and if Perez and Ellison aren't an encouraging pair, I don't know what to tell you.", ">>{ledhe} : Yes, let's keep running candidates that the base doesn't like to ensure we keep losing. /s", ">>{IbanezDavy} : I'd also say, Pelosi continuing as minority leader is also pretty disappointing. Particularly since she literally said nothing needs to change. I'm not sure what to make of Schumer yet... I'm not really against the typical guys still being in the leadership, but it would have been incredibly encouraging if either the minority leader in the house or senate, or the DNC chair itself went the way of the Bernie wing. They are 40% of the party and right now don't really occupy a spot in the leadership. I totally get why people are holding their nose to the democratic party. I think for the past decade and a half they've gotten away with just not being insane like the republicans. I don't think it's wrong for people to expect more. Given the bare minimum eventually pisses people off.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Keep running candidates that your base doesn't like in favor for one that might appeal to the base that is never going to fucking vote for you. Quit tempting conservatives with pseudo-conservatives, because they'll choose the real conservative every...fucking...time. Or at least the one 'running' as a conservative. John McCain didn't win the fucking president being a moderate conservative. Neither did fucking Mitt Romney. Pick a progressive and you'll get the same returns Obama got. Because even though Obama wasn't a huge progressive, he at least ran in a fashion that let people project those progressive values onto him and mixing that with some of his actual progressive positions allowed him to crush both the 'moderates' Mittens and Micky.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : Imagine what would have happened if the choice didn't turn off so many. you Might have actually won the electoral college.", ">>{freecavitycreep} : Or, maybe, if the Russians hadn't hacked the elections, we would have won the EC, too.", '>>{IbanezDavy} : Is there any evidence they hacked voting booths? If not, then your statement is unsupportable. If so, publish it. I am looking for things to be outraged about.', ">>{freecavitycreep} : There's more than one way to skin a cat.", ">>{IbanezDavy} : In that particular case, there's only one. Change the actual voting tallies from what they originally were to what they were reported at. If this did not happen, it is not hacking the election. This is extremely misleading and you know it. They hacked the DNC, not the damn election. The Russians are not responsible for how idiot Americans cast their vote unless those Russians literally changed their ballot from what they selected.", '>>{freecavitycreep} : http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/06/intelligence-community-says-putin-ordered-campaign-to-influence-election-denigrate-clinton.html >"**We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election**. Russia\'s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump," the report said, adding that intelligence agencies have "high confidence" in that assessment. Election, hacked! http://www.dictionary.com/browse/hack?s=t Or is that not PC enough for you?', ">>{IbanezDavy} : That's not hacking the election. Putin can be for whatever side he wants. I get the beef with wanting a response to them hacking the DNC. But that is not hacking the election, and it is incredibly dishonest to frame it that way and you know it. It's why some people, to this day, literally think the Russians changed who they voted for. That's not true (at least there is no evidence for it). And if you propagate that like it's fact knowing it is not true, then you are lying.", '>>{ledhe} : Keep pissing off 46% of the party and enjoy losing in perpetuity.', ">>{johnmountain} : They did actually. They poured all the money into Clinton's campaign, instead of spreading it to states and districts. One of the reason the Democrats were wiped out.", '>>{johnmountain} : Not admitting they slighted him and that this was a problem means they will continue to do it. It\'s more relevant than you think for "unity", if that\'s what the establishment actually want. Of course, I don\'t think they actually want unity. They just want those votes without having to do anything for them.'], ['>>{jonpkay} : Senate Republicans can save the country — and their party — from Trump', '>>{jonpkay} : It is not going to take much for the change to be very slow on some issues.', '>>{StupidRuralAmerican} : They are going to hijack the Presidency and shove down our collective throats a far right agenda, that will take us decades to recover from. During which time, Russia/China will power project their way through half the globe and pretty much define the end of American dominance. Way to go low information/low education voters.', ">>{scaldingramen} : Some issues. But they know they can't stop every move of his. Too much obvious dysfunction and the government will appear to be flailing even under complete republican control. Mitch M is a big believer in only bringing up a vote if you're positive you can win it. So if the rank and file are restless, the issue is likely to get buried to avoid public conflict.", ">>{CollumMcJingleballs} : Mitch McConnell just wants trump to give him what he wants and he'll dump him soon after", '>>{PostTruthPete} : B.S. Trump is a dream come true for them.', ">>{layzpcofcrap} : Our military is still way better than theirs, and the end of US dominance won't go down easy. Which means there will be an inevitable conflict. We just have to hope someone sane is in charge when it comes.", ">>{StupidRuralAmerican} : I hope your are right. But Russia has Trump by the balls. He will not act in the best interest of America. He didn't during the campaign, no reason to believe he will now.", '>>{layzpcofcrap} : > the rank and file I think they hardly exist anymore. Between president Twit and Cruz "fuck up everything in the Senate for my own agenda", why hold back? At the minimum every Senator will be leaking to the press anytime something skeevy is going on. The Post is going to be busy.', ">>{Tsarevich_Lyagushka} : Oh Vox, you're still refusing to accept reality.", ">>{wearywarrior} : > Way to go low information/low education voters. What did you ever expect from them? God damn it, the fact that we ever trusted them makes me ten times angrier than the fact that they did something stupid because they're old and scared of being forced to be gay or some moronic shit like that.", ">>{Bumblelicious} : > Our military is still way better than theirs, I'm not sure why you think this matters. We aren't ever fighting a war like world war two again. The only weapons system a country needs is nuclear deterrent. The rest is just power projection for police action. This just means the US spends blood and treasure shitting in places like Afghanistan or Yemen while Asia becomes the center of finance, culture, and science.", '>>{layzpcofcrap} : In general I agree. Why it matters is that as China, Russia, and to a lesser extent other powers ascend, there will be conflicts over resources. Our military meanwhile has a long way to fall. At some point, someone will test our mettle, politically at first. Then shots will be fired and there will be battles, maybe fought through proxies but it will be another Iraq or worse, which is why I said someone sane will be needed. I am saying this will get very ugly. I\'m not saying "USA #1 no one can beat us", I\'m saying if China tries to dominate even a small nation and we come to their aid, it won\'t end quickly.']]

classify and reply

[">>{shenaniganns} : Well ok. I mean I don't really doubt that that beefy thing can do it, but I kinda wanted to see it in action.", ">>{gobbledykook} : I like how the thumbnail has this drone labeled as transportation. Pretty sure despite its yuge payload it won't be carrying people anytime soon.", ">>{Blarrrrrrrrg} : Two of them could lift OP's mom...am I doing this right?", ">>{stunkcrunk} : So the video has this epic music and the thing doesn't even start up or lift *anything.* WTF?", '>>{dimsumwitmychum} : This is the beginning of the personal areial transportation dream! You could create a chassis or safety cage for this thing and it would still be below its payload with a human operator. Awesome.', '>>{JedComic-con} : There are drones, and then there are drones what a way to start an article.', ">>{potatotron} : It's weird that was the video they picked. Here's one of it in action, but be warned the music is pretty painful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6NlEI3LacE", ">>{obidie} : Their marketing department should be ashamed of themselves. Okay, you show multiple angles of some drone with dramatic lighting and bad music, big deal. The one that shows it in flight is just as awful. Why spend all that money on videos that don't prove your selling point?", ">>{Tkinney44} : Wouldn't having a propeller on top of the other one make the one on top put out less force? Or perhaps it's the other way around...Idk why but my mind is saying no", '>>{DonutPills} : But my body! my bodddyyyyyy is telling me yes~~', '>>{_awake} : Define "anytime soon". In an interview with a consultant for major car companies the guy (I don\'t remember his name and I\'m on mobile, sorry) said, that he is pretty sure to see drones carrying people in his lifetime (he was in his mid 40s I think) and why and how the idea or theory is superior to autonomous cars.', '>>{calculore} : This would be an awesome way to get rescued from a burning building.... just saying.', '>>{3468373564} : trouble is, safety cage + gravity = death trap', '>>{dimsumwitmychum} : As opposed to what? I would say gravity = death trap. I wouldnt use this thing as a personal transportation device if there was any chance over .05% that it would malfunction. In other words the safety cage would not be to prevent death or serious injury from system failure resulting in both the human and the drone hurtling to the earth. It would be to prevent the operator from falling from the vehicle while it is still airborne or coming into contact with the machine and other airborne objects.', '>>{_Hypnotoad} : Step 1: Add personal tether and harness. Step 3: Profit!', '>>{baseball44121} : For the low low price of way too much money.', ">>{TheBatmanToMyBruce} : It's true - these are the flying cars we wanted. The concept was never going to work with people at the controls.", '>>{Section37} : > but be warned the music is pretty painful: You weren\'t kidding. I was warned, but not warned enough. It\'s like the music South Park would use to make fun of developer videos claiming their product is "epic"', ">>{Calcium_Is_A_Lie} : This is nothing compared to this [drone.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_CH-47_Chinook) I can lift thousands of pounds and only has two rotors. It's probably best drone ever.", '>>{_awake} : One guy not caring about the rest is enough. The autonomous cars are going to brake anyway so why wait and not go full speed?', ">>{Bezeltazer} : I bet it doesn't last carrying that any longer than I would.", ">>{tubbernickel} : Casey's a narcissistic dimwit. Let's not utter his name here, the man lives off of clicks after all. [8]", ">>{unsubstantiation} : I'm pretty sure it can't actually lift that payload.", ">>{fromthevault47} : This is the start of skynet I swear. That's a pretty impressive piece of equipment", ">>{_awake} : I think the major difference between helicopters and the thing we call drone in everyday life is the number of rotors. I also believe it's harder to fly a helicopter than to fly a drone (never have been in a helicopter though).", '>>{rdrv} : A single good image would have sufficed. Instead I witnessed 60 long seconds of super-dramatic music and caught so many angles of an exceptionally uninspired and static black frame with propellers. I guess we really need video no matter what.', '>>{wplno1} : How long before one of these is used for a jailbreak!', '>>{impossiblefork} : As I see it the problems with a helicopter is that the rotor diameter is so large as to make it very bulky. Meanwhile, a [flying motorcycle-sized multicopter](http://www.hover-bike.com/) like the one in the link or some future derivative of the Griff can be about as small as a car. This would mean that it would be possible to land them in modified parking spaces so that ordinary people could operate them in cities and places without big closed-off helicopter landing pads.', '>>{oosegoose1} : Quadcopters and drones are starting to become synonymous words unfortunately.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{shenaniganns} : Well ok. I mean I don't really doubt that that beefy thing can do it, but I kinda wanted to see it in action.", ">>{gobbledykook} : I like how the thumbnail has this drone labeled as transportation. Pretty sure despite its yuge payload it won't be carrying people anytime soon.", ">>{Blarrrrrrrrg} : Two of them could lift OP's mom...am I doing this right?", ">>{stunkcrunk} : So the video has this epic music and the thing doesn't even start up or lift *anything.* WTF?", '>>{dimsumwitmychum} : This is the beginning of the personal areial transportation dream! You could create a chassis or safety cage for this thing and it would still be below its payload with a human operator. Awesome.', '>>{JedComic-con} : There are drones, and then there are drones what a way to start an article.', ">>{potatotron} : It's weird that was the video they picked. Here's one of it in action, but be warned the music is pretty painful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6NlEI3LacE", ">>{obidie} : Their marketing department should be ashamed of themselves. Okay, you show multiple angles of some drone with dramatic lighting and bad music, big deal. The one that shows it in flight is just as awful. Why spend all that money on videos that don't prove your selling point?", ">>{Tkinney44} : Wouldn't having a propeller on top of the other one make the one on top put out less force? Or perhaps it's the other way around...Idk why but my mind is saying no", '>>{DonutPills} : But my body! my bodddyyyyyy is telling me yes~~', '>>{_awake} : Define "anytime soon". In an interview with a consultant for major car companies the guy (I don\'t remember his name and I\'m on mobile, sorry) said, that he is pretty sure to see drones carrying people in his lifetime (he was in his mid 40s I think) and why and how the idea or theory is superior to autonomous cars.', '>>{calculore} : This would be an awesome way to get rescued from a burning building.... just saying.', '>>{3468373564} : trouble is, safety cage + gravity = death trap', '>>{dimsumwitmychum} : As opposed to what? I would say gravity = death trap. I wouldnt use this thing as a personal transportation device if there was any chance over .05% that it would malfunction. In other words the safety cage would not be to prevent death or serious injury from system failure resulting in both the human and the drone hurtling to the earth. It would be to prevent the operator from falling from the vehicle while it is still airborne or coming into contact with the machine and other airborne objects.', '>>{_Hypnotoad} : Step 1: Add personal tether and harness. Step 3: Profit!', '>>{baseball44121} : For the low low price of way too much money.', ">>{TheBatmanToMyBruce} : It's true - these are the flying cars we wanted. The concept was never going to work with people at the controls.", '>>{Section37} : > but be warned the music is pretty painful: You weren\'t kidding. I was warned, but not warned enough. It\'s like the music South Park would use to make fun of developer videos claiming their product is "epic"', ">>{Calcium_Is_A_Lie} : This is nothing compared to this [drone.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_CH-47_Chinook) I can lift thousands of pounds and only has two rotors. It's probably best drone ever.", '>>{_awake} : One guy not caring about the rest is enough. The autonomous cars are going to brake anyway so why wait and not go full speed?', ">>{Bezeltazer} : I bet it doesn't last carrying that any longer than I would.", ">>{tubbernickel} : Casey's a narcissistic dimwit. Let's not utter his name here, the man lives off of clicks after all. [8]", ">>{unsubstantiation} : I'm pretty sure it can't actually lift that payload.", ">>{fromthevault47} : This is the start of skynet I swear. That's a pretty impressive piece of equipment", ">>{_awake} : I think the major difference between helicopters and the thing we call drone in everyday life is the number of rotors. I also believe it's harder to fly a helicopter than to fly a drone (never have been in a helicopter though).", '>>{rdrv} : A single good image would have sufficed. Instead I witnessed 60 long seconds of super-dramatic music and caught so many angles of an exceptionally uninspired and static black frame with propellers. I guess we really need video no matter what.', '>>{wplno1} : How long before one of these is used for a jailbreak!', '>>{impossiblefork} : As I see it the problems with a helicopter is that the rotor diameter is so large as to make it very bulky. Meanwhile, a [flying motorcycle-sized multicopter](http://www.hover-bike.com/) like the one in the link or some future derivative of the Griff can be about as small as a car. This would mean that it would be possible to land them in modified parking spaces so that ordinary people could operate them in cities and places without big closed-off helicopter landing pads.', '>>{oosegoose1} : Quadcopters and drones are starting to become synonymous words unfortunately.']]

classify and reply

['>>{johnmountain} : Senate Democrats Blow Best Chance to Demand Special Russia Prosecutor', '>>{Trump_Hearts_Putin} : House Intelligence sets goals for Russia investigation, including potential Trump contacts', '>>{DownWithAssad} : Russia’s Infamous ‘Troll Factory’ Is Now Posing as a Media Empire', ">>{nutmeg000} : Teens suing U.S. over climate change ask for Exxon's 'Wayne Tracker' emails", '>>{W0LF_JK} : I hope the courts agree that this case has Standing, [Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch may not agree..](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/60fuw0/how_trumps_supreme_court_pick_quietly_wipes_out/)', ">>{kungfoojesus} : Can we all just send a bill to the baby boomers for living the highlife on their grandchildrens dimes? Your rest homes wil now all be trump properties! Can't afford it? Get a ducking job! That job pays $7.50 and hour? Too fucking bad! Can't afford healthcare? Not our responsibility!! Pollution is flaring your copd? Too fucking bad! You want to immigrate to another country that will treat you better and give you healthcare? They are racist against white people and blocked all immigration from white prominent countries! See boomers, isn't this fun?!", '>>{Trump_Hearts_Putin} : > House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and ranking member Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) released a summary of the investigations aims Wednesday evening. > > The main questions they\'ll focus on are: > > "What Russian cyber activity and other active measures were directed against the United States and its allies? Did the Russian active measures include links between Russia and individuals associated with political campaigns or any other U.S. Persons? What was the U.S. Government’s response to these Russian active measures and what do we need to do to protect ourselves and our allies in the future? What possible leaks of classified information took place related to the Intelligence Community Assessment of these matters?"', '>>{DownWithAssad} : >At least one popular pro-Trump, anti-Clinton Facebook group called Secured Borders, says RBC, is managed from the St. Petersburg troll factory. >RBC claims it obtained a screenshot of the group’s advertisement statistics (available only to a Facebook group’s administrator) from someone who claims to be its owner, which confirmed that the group is managed from St. Petersburg. >Secured Borders boasts 140 thousand subscribers, and just one of its posts published at the height of the election campaign and heavily advertised on Facebook, reached 4 million people on Facebook, was “liked” more than 300 thousand times and shared more than 80 thousand times. RBC also reported that a right-wing Twitter account called Tea Party News, which is followed by 22 thousand other accounts, is also run from the St. Petersburg hub. >All in all, RBC’s sources say that at the zenith of the U.S. election campaign, the troll factory’s accounts across different social media platforms would churn out as many as 50 million posts a month, with anti-Clinton messages getting the most attention. This is massive news. It directly confirms that the FBI\'s investigation into right-wing news outlets being funded/supported by Russian propaganda factories is on the right path! For those that speak Russian, here is the original, massive investigation: http://www.rbc.ru/magazine/2017/04/58d106b09a794710fa8934ac?from=subject Here\'s the FB group, whom a whopping 140,000 feeble-minded, brainwashed, partisan reactionaries are following like cultist sheep: https://www.facebook.com/Secured.Borders/ Here\'s one of the Twitter accounts they ran, "Tea Party News": https://twitter.com/tpartynews?lang=en', '>>{Claritypleas} : How about, "What contact did the Trump campaign have with Russian officials? When? What was discussed?" and most importantly, "How much did Trump know and when?"', '>>{Noastroturfinthissub} : Guys, give up on this shit. FBI has said no evidence, CIA has said no evidence, Intelligence select committe has said no evidence, over sight committee has said no evidence, numerous analysts, senators, house members, etc have sa8d no evidence. We are now 9 months deep have seen no evidence or charges, trumps tapping claim has put the kibosh on the narrative and vault 7 run the carcass through a meat grinder. Even if they thought fuck it and pulled the trigger anyway the entire intelligence apparatus has been deligitimized. People wouldnt trust the cia with a glass of water now. This issue is dead.', '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : All the more reason he can never sit in that chair', ">>{freewafflecones} : In a way, this is reassuring. I am frightened, but it's a good thing that these things are becoming more visible to the public.", '>>{neurocentricx} : > The second question in the scope agreement directly addresses this issue: **"Did the Russian active measures include links between Russia and individuals associated with political campaigns or any other U.S. Persons?"** This is the question I wanted answered most.', ">>{magtig} : Samantha Bee interviewed paid Russian trolls before the election. I still can't understand why it didn't get more attention. https://youtu.be/OauLuWXD_RI", ">>{Tobeck} : I remember reading about this shit as early as the staged Turkish coup, when Pro-Kremlin trolls became Pro-Erdogan trolls. Someone had been tracking them and wrote an article about it and how they were becoming Pro-Trump... but I don't remember which key terms to use to find it.", '>>{chloes1_1968} : Oh, probably... that rag appeals to his unique reading comprehension.', ">>{Bartins} : So Nunes met with the National Enquirer at the White House? I like where this is going and by that I mean I have no clue where it's going but I'm ready.", '>>{Roach35} : [Could link this all day.](https://i.imgur.com/O0UjOJZ.jpg)', ">>{Matthmaroo} : It's going to have to wait for the 2018 wave", '>>{throwaway_ghast} : Thanks for your keen observations, but keep them on the_donald where they belong.', '>>{LionelHutz_Law} : Anyone else sick as fuck of dealing with Russia?', ">>{ialsohaveadobro} : *He's* a tight-lipped international oil man after Putin's own heart. *He's* gangly disgraced politician with an eye for teens and a camera-loving cock. Together they're fighting crime, for some reason. Tracker & Danger. Fridays on CBS.", '>>{throwaway_ghast} : We need to install more Democrats with a spine.', '>>{CommunismWillTriumph} : When are the Dems going to stop red baiting like the 1950s and actually start forming a new platform to win in 2018?', ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : Nunes' source is 100% legit. They can read the source by heading to the White House bathroom and perusing its contents. 100% accurate. 100% tabloid format.", ">>{professorrumham} : Links to the official intelligence community saying there's no case? It's also known that Wikileaks has deep connections with the Russians. Couldn't it be seen as the Russians providing this information to Wikileaks to assist trump deligitimizing the CIA?", '>>{astonishingpants} : My grandmother believed what the Enquirer said, too, and ended up wasting hundreds of dollars on worthless supplements and magazine subscriptions that never materialized. Selling personal data, old school style- because she subscribed to that rag, she got mountains of junk mail and wasted all kinds of money on that shit.', '>>{defmeta} : Are any of us truly read for any of this shit?', '>>{Stuckinaloop} : If they can sell ads then what is the difference?', '>>{Doom_Art} : >this issue is dead Bet you and your pals from the_donald would just love that lol. Seems to me like things are just getting started.', '>>{ChuckFromPhilly} : Explains why Nunes also briefed trump on the worlds fattest baby alien who knows where Amelia Earhart is.', ">>{ophelia_jones} : There has to be implications for Facebook and how these groups are managed. I'm curious to see how they respond, if they respond, because I think they've taken a neutral/non-interventional stance in the past.", ">>{undecidedly} : They most certainly have not said there isn't evidence. Care to justify that interpretation with actual proof?", '>>{hazpat} : I think you are posting in the wrong thread or having a stroke.', '>>{upstateman} : There best chance not being a chance at all. But the Intercept finds a way to blame the wrong people.', '>>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : Both of these things, simultaneously. We are large; we contain multitudes.', '>>{Trump_Hearts_Putin} : Chewing gum and walking at the same time is hard for some people. Most of us can manage though. Thanks for your concern trolling though.', '>>{AcerRubrum} : Lets see, we have a marijuana descheduling bill coming up in the house, Bernie is pushing bills that would lower the costs of healthcare through international price negotiation, and Senate democrats are working on an infrastructure package that doesnt rely on private third party contractors or toll roads. Id say theyre already showing their cards for 2018. Remember, for the past 8 years the GOP have basically campaigned on destroying Obamas legislation and legacy. Trump doesnt even have any meaningful legislation passed yet to oppose.', ">>{upstateman} : > Guys, give up on this shit. FBI has said no evidence, No they didn't. >CIA has said no evidence, No they didn't. The committees say they won't look. As Rand Paul said: that would mean Republican investigating Republicans.", ">>{GoldenShowerDonnie} : Highlighting President Puppet's connections with Putin along with the way he's screwing over his moronic cult are quite a potent combo.", ">>{Drpained} : He'll just condescend about how corporations have freedom of speech, so the Government has no authority to make them be honest.", '>>{RonaldDumbsfield} : I bet Trump owns a Troll Factory, and runs it like an evil Willy Wonka.', ">>{kap_fallback} : wtf kind of source is this? This isn't real political news, this is bottom tier trash.", '>>{madusldasl} : That last question should be, "in what ways can we help encourage people to come forward with information vital to preserving our nation for its people and how can we better protect whistleblowers from undue prosecution from the subjects of the leaks?"', ">>{takeashill_pill} : It's not red baiting, they're not communists. This is potentially the biggest scandal in American history, it needs to be investigated down to the last detail. And IMO the Dem platform is fine, they just need better resource allocation (too much on ads and not enough on the ground.)", '>>{Inumbrate} : It would be pretty funny if "documents" that Nunes looked at in the SCIF during his White House visit was really just a copy of the National Enquirer.', '>>{LughLamhfoisteanach} : Then why are you trying so hard to get people to shut up about it? U scrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd.', ">>{Hobophobic} : You know Nunes only caved because he was tipped off about the NYT story. I still wouldn't be surprised if he tried to bury it behind closed doors. His behavior indicates something unwholesome.", '>>{slanaiya} : No evidence of what? Why would the "revelation" that the US\'s spy agency has spy tools discredit it? I would think the revelation that a spy agency didn\'t have spy tools would be the damaging kind. This is like a "scandal" based on the "revelation" that a bus company owns buses.', ">>{NPMSRP} : We'll know for certain once Nunes starts claiming that Bat Boy has been surveilling Trump from the skies.", ">>{Drpained} : The only thing I can think of regarding the last claim was some far-right articles about how Germany and Sweden are banning Ukrainian and White immigrants to allow in brown ones or something. Can't be fucked to try to dig it up because it's ridiculous on the surface.", '>>{weerdbuttstuff} : I always preferred the Weekly World News; page 5 girls, batboy, not being a propaganda rag, all that good stuff.', '>>{bleed_air_blimp} : I love how carefully crafted that question is to avoid mentioning Trump by name.', ">>{kelshrc} : I remember watching that and thinking that it was satire. I had no idea she interviewed legitimate Russian trolls because why would they openly admit to it? The Russian troll thing is so interesting/terrifying. They used to always be in Trump's twitter mentions, but have considerably died down since he was inaugurated.", ">>{Searchlights} : The owner of the Enquirer is a good friend of Trump. Did anybody else see the edition in checkouts over the weekend that proclaim that Trump caught Russia's White House spy? Not only is it not Trump's fault for hiring a foreign agent to be his NSA, but he's a goddamn hero for it. Actually, here. I took a pic of it: http://imgur.com/a/HXhRQ", '>>{ComradSanders} : Lemme know how being more realistic worked in 2008-2016 when you went from majority to minority.', '>>{Matthmaroo} : No such thing as a permanent majority It would of happened to sanders', ">>{ComradSanders} : > No such thing as a permanent majority Yep, they've been losing for 8 years better double down on the same losing strategy.", ">>{nakdamink} : You're right but it works better when you include links to the facts. So here you go. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/28/the-very-cozy-relationship-between-donald-trump-and-the-national-enquirer/ Not a single negative story http://www.nationalenquirer.com/tag/donald-trump/", ">>{imaterriblelurker} : It's so weird how whenever Sweden succeeds, it's because of a homogenized culture, but otherwise you guys are shariah mandated cuckistan. Det er samme her lille bror🇳🇴", '>>{bejammin075} : They communicated by occupying adjacent stalls and doing an elaborate series of foot taps.', '>>{Bold-heart} : These trolls are active on Reddit too. Caveat lector.', ">>{Drpained} : I can't even remember where I saw it. Maybe Daily Stormer around last fall. I love reading far-right stuff because it's really funny when stupid people act smug and elitist.", '>>{IrishJoe} : Na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na **BATBOY!!!!!!**', ">>{Searchlights} : Thanks. I admit I was just repeating what I'd heard about their relationship. I should have looked in to it more. I probably should also have read that Enquirer article to see what it says, but I didn't want to touch it.", '>>{Quinnjester} : hope someone catches it and puts it in think progress of Wapo.', '>>{ComradSanders} : Very simple, 50 state strategy and run on more progressive policies since they individually poll well with majority of Americans.', '>>{rk119} : And so will Washington Post and The Failing NY Times.', '>>{WesternPhilosophy} : The Rosneft representative was kind enough to share 19.5% of his toilet paper with the nearby stall.', ">>{Matthmaroo} : Easy to say Liberalism/Progressivism won't play in West Virginia , Mississippi , Alabama , Texas , Kansas , Arkansas , Oklahoma and so on It's like on s4p They want to primary joe manchin - they think a progressive can win in WV because Bernie won the primary I wish it was so But it is a fantasy", '>>{DownWithAssad} : Here is the original, massive investigation, by one of Russia\'s leading investigative/business outlets: http://www.rbc.ru/magazine/2017/04/58d106b09a794710fa8934ac?from=subject Here\'s the FB group, whom a whopping 140,000 feeble-minded, brainwashed, partisan reactionaries are following like cultist sheep: https://www.facebook.com/Secured.Borders/ Here\'s one of the Twitter accounts they ran, "Tea Party News": https://twitter.com/tpartynews?lang=en', '>>{basaltgranite} : The "WH Spy" story smearing Flynn has been interpreted as support for the rumor that Flynn has gone state\'s witness at the FBI. The NE\'s source was likely Trump, who if so thought that discrediting Flynn (before his testimony goes public) was worth admitting extreme negligence in hiring him (if you accept the self-serving NE story at face value and believe that Trump reasoned out the inferences). Maybe the Trump\'s about to hit the fan and is getting desperate.', '>>{nakdamink} : Fair enough. I debated posting the enquirer in my comment but figured completeness > giving them a few cents through ads.', '>>{birdiesanders2016} : Well, we still do. Just not in the same capacity as we hoped. Bernie Sanders is the moral voice of this country.', ">>{theshillerator} : One could argue Democrats lost their House majority in 2010 because they weren't realistic about the intensity of opposition to the ACA.", ">>{theshillerator} : Progressive policies are all well and good where they can win. But in some places, they can't win. No matter how hard you campaign on them, no matter how well you explain them. So, if the Democrats want to return the majority, they need to tolerate diversity in the caucus. The path to majority runs through red state Dems that are probably a lot more conservative than many in the caucus would prefer.", '>>{Searchlights} : > The "WH Spy" story smearing Flynn has been interpreted as support for the rumor that Flynn has gone state\'s witness at the FBI. Yes I read that too, and god do I hope that\'s true. If people start flipping on each other it\'ll bring the whole thing down.', ">>{Vgatv} : Still waiting for Batboy to get White House Credentials. Sadly he'd probably do a better job than some of the right wing outlets that currently have access. Batboy has journalistic integrity", '>>{bonko86} : I agree with most of what you said, but you sure used big words there in the end.', ">>{theshillerator} : Well said. You need some Manchins to get a majority. An ideologically pure progressive caucus doesn't matter much if you can only win 45 seats", ">>{StupidForehead} : Wait till TeeRump crashes the bond market, wiping out the generation's retirement funds. Wallstreet routinely advises old folks to invest in bonds. It is like a 1-2 blow to their life savings, 1st crash the equity markets on the eve of their careers... & then blast their dreams away with a bond market crash as they wake up a few days after retiring. 99% of Boomers got ass fucked by their 1% brethren.", '>>{jpell12} : Whoopsie Daisy - Nunes may have spoken too soon last week. Gosh I hope they implicate this idiot as well.', '>>{Cayde-187} : They are failing themselves right into a few dozen Peabodies.', ">>{lovely_sombrero} : >Liberalism/Progressivism won't play in West Virginia , Mississippi , Alabama , Texas , Kansas , Arkansas , Oklahoma and so on Unlike Hillary Clinton - Will Texas become another brick in the Democrats' blue wall? https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/will-texas-become-another-brick-in-the-democrats-blue-wall/2016/07/20/08b55f5e-4de0-11e6-a422-83ab49ed5e6a_story.html?utm_term=.026547825f53", ">>{weerdbuttstuff} : [Frankly, I'm disappointed the Romney/Batboy ticket didn't take off like I'd hoped.](https://imgur.com/a/2AzTg)", '>>{Matthmaroo} : I go to Texas a lot The Dems would have to change who they are to win in Texas in my opinion', '>>{Predictive} : Yeah, large print, one syllable words and pictures, lots of pictures.', ">>{Decolater} : Okay, let's put aside all the jokes about this tabloid and focus on this: >our spy sources inside America’s intelligence community allowed The ENQUIRER (emphasis theirs) to view 132 pages of those transcripts – outlining the contents of calls made from numbers inside Trump Tower in NYC to other unspecified numbers. What’s more, and as The ENQUIRER can now relate, those calls were mundane and innocuous. If those 132 pages are the same ones Nunes looked at, he had to look at them in a SCI-FI because of how classified they are. The real story is how the National Enquirer was able to see them. I mean, c'mon, if you are going to risk going to jail, would you pick the National Enquirer? If the National Enquirer actually did see these 132 documents, and these are the same documents Nunes saw, then how did they get into the hands of the National Enquirer. I mean the National Enquirer, who would pick that rag...cough...cough...someone with a friendship with the owner... Enquiring minds want to know."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{johnmountain} : Senate Democrats Blow Best Chance to Demand Special Russia Prosecutor', '>>{Noastroturfinthissub} : Guys, give up on this shit. FBI has said no evidence, CIA has said no evidence, Intelligence select committe has said no evidence, over sight committee has said no evidence, numerous analysts, senators, house members, etc have sa8d no evidence. We are now 9 months deep have seen no evidence or charges, trumps tapping claim has put the kibosh on the narrative and vault 7 run the carcass through a meat grinder. Even if they thought fuck it and pulled the trigger anyway the entire intelligence apparatus has been deligitimized. People wouldnt trust the cia with a glass of water now. This issue is dead.', ">>{Matthmaroo} : It's going to have to wait for the 2018 wave", '>>{throwaway_ghast} : Thanks for your keen observations, but keep them on the_donald where they belong.', '>>{throwaway_ghast} : We need to install more Democrats with a spine.', ">>{professorrumham} : Links to the official intelligence community saying there's no case? It's also known that Wikileaks has deep connections with the Russians. Couldn't it be seen as the Russians providing this information to Wikileaks to assist trump deligitimizing the CIA?", '>>{Doom_Art} : >this issue is dead Bet you and your pals from the_donald would just love that lol. Seems to me like things are just getting started.', ">>{undecidedly} : They most certainly have not said there isn't evidence. Care to justify that interpretation with actual proof?", '>>{upstateman} : There best chance not being a chance at all. But the Intercept finds a way to blame the wrong people.', ">>{upstateman} : > Guys, give up on this shit. FBI has said no evidence, No they didn't. >CIA has said no evidence, No they didn't. The committees say they won't look. As Rand Paul said: that would mean Republican investigating Republicans.", '>>{LughLamhfoisteanach} : Then why are you trying so hard to get people to shut up about it? U scrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd.', '>>{slanaiya} : No evidence of what? Why would the "revelation" that the US\'s spy agency has spy tools discredit it? I would think the revelation that a spy agency didn\'t have spy tools would be the damaging kind. This is like a "scandal" based on the "revelation" that a bus company owns buses.', '>>{ComradSanders} : Lemme know how being more realistic worked in 2008-2016 when you went from majority to minority.', '>>{Matthmaroo} : No such thing as a permanent majority It would of happened to sanders', ">>{ComradSanders} : > No such thing as a permanent majority Yep, they've been losing for 8 years better double down on the same losing strategy.", '>>{ComradSanders} : Very simple, 50 state strategy and run on more progressive policies since they individually poll well with majority of Americans.', ">>{Matthmaroo} : Easy to say Liberalism/Progressivism won't play in West Virginia , Mississippi , Alabama , Texas , Kansas , Arkansas , Oklahoma and so on It's like on s4p They want to primary joe manchin - they think a progressive can win in WV because Bernie won the primary I wish it was so But it is a fantasy", ">>{theshillerator} : One could argue Democrats lost their House majority in 2010 because they weren't realistic about the intensity of opposition to the ACA.", ">>{theshillerator} : Progressive policies are all well and good where they can win. But in some places, they can't win. No matter how hard you campaign on them, no matter how well you explain them. So, if the Democrats want to return the majority, they need to tolerate diversity in the caucus. The path to majority runs through red state Dems that are probably a lot more conservative than many in the caucus would prefer.", ">>{theshillerator} : Well said. You need some Manchins to get a majority. An ideologically pure progressive caucus doesn't matter much if you can only win 45 seats", ">>{lovely_sombrero} : >Liberalism/Progressivism won't play in West Virginia , Mississippi , Alabama , Texas , Kansas , Arkansas , Oklahoma and so on Unlike Hillary Clinton - Will Texas become another brick in the Democrats' blue wall? https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/will-texas-become-another-brick-in-the-democrats-blue-wall/2016/07/20/08b55f5e-4de0-11e6-a422-83ab49ed5e6a_story.html?utm_term=.026547825f53", '>>{Matthmaroo} : I go to Texas a lot The Dems would have to change who they are to win in Texas in my opinion'], [">>{nutmeg000} : Teens suing U.S. over climate change ask for Exxon's 'Wayne Tracker' emails", '>>{W0LF_JK} : I hope the courts agree that this case has Standing, [Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch may not agree..](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/60fuw0/how_trumps_supreme_court_pick_quietly_wipes_out/)', ">>{kungfoojesus} : Can we all just send a bill to the baby boomers for living the highlife on their grandchildrens dimes? Your rest homes wil now all be trump properties! Can't afford it? Get a ducking job! That job pays $7.50 and hour? Too fucking bad! Can't afford healthcare? Not our responsibility!! Pollution is flaring your copd? Too fucking bad! You want to immigrate to another country that will treat you better and give you healthcare? They are racist against white people and blocked all immigration from white prominent countries! See boomers, isn't this fun?!", '>>{UvonTheDeplorable} : All the more reason he can never sit in that chair', '>>{Roach35} : [Could link this all day.](https://i.imgur.com/O0UjOJZ.jpg)', ">>{ialsohaveadobro} : *He's* a tight-lipped international oil man after Putin's own heart. *He's* gangly disgraced politician with an eye for teens and a camera-loving cock. Together they're fighting crime, for some reason. Tracker & Danger. Fridays on CBS.", '>>{hazpat} : I think you are posting in the wrong thread or having a stroke.', ">>{Drpained} : He'll just condescend about how corporations have freedom of speech, so the Government has no authority to make them be honest.", ">>{Drpained} : The only thing I can think of regarding the last claim was some far-right articles about how Germany and Sweden are banning Ukrainian and White immigrants to allow in brown ones or something. Can't be fucked to try to dig it up because it's ridiculous on the surface.", ">>{imaterriblelurker} : It's so weird how whenever Sweden succeeds, it's because of a homogenized culture, but otherwise you guys are shariah mandated cuckistan. Det er samme her lille bror🇳🇴", ">>{Drpained} : I can't even remember where I saw it. Maybe Daily Stormer around last fall. I love reading far-right stuff because it's really funny when stupid people act smug and elitist.", '>>{bonko86} : I agree with most of what you said, but you sure used big words there in the end.', ">>{StupidForehead} : Wait till TeeRump crashes the bond market, wiping out the generation's retirement funds. Wallstreet routinely advises old folks to invest in bonds. It is like a 1-2 blow to their life savings, 1st crash the equity markets on the eve of their careers... & then blast their dreams away with a bond market crash as they wake up a few days after retiring. 99% of Boomers got ass fucked by their 1% brethren."], ['>>{chloes1_1968} : Oh, probably... that rag appeals to his unique reading comprehension.', ">>{Bartins} : So Nunes met with the National Enquirer at the White House? I like where this is going and by that I mean I have no clue where it's going but I'm ready.", ">>{WesternPhilosophy} : Nunes' source is 100% legit. They can read the source by heading to the White House bathroom and perusing its contents. 100% accurate. 100% tabloid format.", '>>{astonishingpants} : My grandmother believed what the Enquirer said, too, and ended up wasting hundreds of dollars on worthless supplements and magazine subscriptions that never materialized. Selling personal data, old school style- because she subscribed to that rag, she got mountains of junk mail and wasted all kinds of money on that shit.', '>>{defmeta} : Are any of us truly read for any of this shit?', '>>{ChuckFromPhilly} : Explains why Nunes also briefed trump on the worlds fattest baby alien who knows where Amelia Earhart is.', '>>{Inumbrate} : It would be pretty funny if "documents" that Nunes looked at in the SCIF during his White House visit was really just a copy of the National Enquirer.', ">>{NPMSRP} : We'll know for certain once Nunes starts claiming that Bat Boy has been surveilling Trump from the skies.", '>>{weerdbuttstuff} : I always preferred the Weekly World News; page 5 girls, batboy, not being a propaganda rag, all that good stuff.', ">>{Searchlights} : The owner of the Enquirer is a good friend of Trump. Did anybody else see the edition in checkouts over the weekend that proclaim that Trump caught Russia's White House spy? Not only is it not Trump's fault for hiring a foreign agent to be his NSA, but he's a goddamn hero for it. Actually, here. I took a pic of it: http://imgur.com/a/HXhRQ", ">>{nakdamink} : You're right but it works better when you include links to the facts. So here you go. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/28/the-very-cozy-relationship-between-donald-trump-and-the-national-enquirer/ Not a single negative story http://www.nationalenquirer.com/tag/donald-trump/", '>>{bejammin075} : They communicated by occupying adjacent stalls and doing an elaborate series of foot taps.', '>>{IrishJoe} : Na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na **BATBOY!!!!!!**', ">>{Searchlights} : Thanks. I admit I was just repeating what I'd heard about their relationship. I should have looked in to it more. I probably should also have read that Enquirer article to see what it says, but I didn't want to touch it.", '>>{WesternPhilosophy} : The Rosneft representative was kind enough to share 19.5% of his toilet paper with the nearby stall.', '>>{basaltgranite} : The "WH Spy" story smearing Flynn has been interpreted as support for the rumor that Flynn has gone state\'s witness at the FBI. The NE\'s source was likely Trump, who if so thought that discrediting Flynn (before his testimony goes public) was worth admitting extreme negligence in hiring him (if you accept the self-serving NE story at face value and believe that Trump reasoned out the inferences). Maybe the Trump\'s about to hit the fan and is getting desperate.', '>>{nakdamink} : Fair enough. I debated posting the enquirer in my comment but figured completeness > giving them a few cents through ads.', '>>{Searchlights} : > The "WH Spy" story smearing Flynn has been interpreted as support for the rumor that Flynn has gone state\'s witness at the FBI. Yes I read that too, and god do I hope that\'s true. If people start flipping on each other it\'ll bring the whole thing down.', ">>{Vgatv} : Still waiting for Batboy to get White House Credentials. Sadly he'd probably do a better job than some of the right wing outlets that currently have access. Batboy has journalistic integrity", ">>{weerdbuttstuff} : [Frankly, I'm disappointed the Romney/Batboy ticket didn't take off like I'd hoped.](https://imgur.com/a/2AzTg)", '>>{Predictive} : Yeah, large print, one syllable words and pictures, lots of pictures.', ">>{Decolater} : Okay, let's put aside all the jokes about this tabloid and focus on this: >our spy sources inside America’s intelligence community allowed The ENQUIRER (emphasis theirs) to view 132 pages of those transcripts – outlining the contents of calls made from numbers inside Trump Tower in NYC to other unspecified numbers. What’s more, and as The ENQUIRER can now relate, those calls were mundane and innocuous. If those 132 pages are the same ones Nunes looked at, he had to look at them in a SCI-FI because of how classified they are. The real story is how the National Enquirer was able to see them. I mean, c'mon, if you are going to risk going to jail, would you pick the National Enquirer? If the National Enquirer actually did see these 132 documents, and these are the same documents Nunes saw, then how did they get into the hands of the National Enquirer. I mean the National Enquirer, who would pick that rag...cough...cough...someone with a friendship with the owner... Enquiring minds want to know."], ['>>{DownWithAssad} : Russia’s Infamous ‘Troll Factory’ Is Now Posing as a Media Empire', '>>{DownWithAssad} : >At least one popular pro-Trump, anti-Clinton Facebook group called Secured Borders, says RBC, is managed from the St. Petersburg troll factory. >RBC claims it obtained a screenshot of the group’s advertisement statistics (available only to a Facebook group’s administrator) from someone who claims to be its owner, which confirmed that the group is managed from St. Petersburg. >Secured Borders boasts 140 thousand subscribers, and just one of its posts published at the height of the election campaign and heavily advertised on Facebook, reached 4 million people on Facebook, was “liked” more than 300 thousand times and shared more than 80 thousand times. RBC also reported that a right-wing Twitter account called Tea Party News, which is followed by 22 thousand other accounts, is also run from the St. Petersburg hub. >All in all, RBC’s sources say that at the zenith of the U.S. election campaign, the troll factory’s accounts across different social media platforms would churn out as many as 50 million posts a month, with anti-Clinton messages getting the most attention. This is massive news. It directly confirms that the FBI\'s investigation into right-wing news outlets being funded/supported by Russian propaganda factories is on the right path! For those that speak Russian, here is the original, massive investigation: http://www.rbc.ru/magazine/2017/04/58d106b09a794710fa8934ac?from=subject Here\'s the FB group, whom a whopping 140,000 feeble-minded, brainwashed, partisan reactionaries are following like cultist sheep: https://www.facebook.com/Secured.Borders/ Here\'s one of the Twitter accounts they ran, "Tea Party News": https://twitter.com/tpartynews?lang=en', ">>{freewafflecones} : In a way, this is reassuring. I am frightened, but it's a good thing that these things are becoming more visible to the public.", ">>{magtig} : Samantha Bee interviewed paid Russian trolls before the election. I still can't understand why it didn't get more attention. https://youtu.be/OauLuWXD_RI", ">>{Tobeck} : I remember reading about this shit as early as the staged Turkish coup, when Pro-Kremlin trolls became Pro-Erdogan trolls. Someone had been tracking them and wrote an article about it and how they were becoming Pro-Trump... but I don't remember which key terms to use to find it.", '>>{LionelHutz_Law} : Anyone else sick as fuck of dealing with Russia?', '>>{Stuckinaloop} : If they can sell ads then what is the difference?', ">>{ophelia_jones} : There has to be implications for Facebook and how these groups are managed. I'm curious to see how they respond, if they respond, because I think they've taken a neutral/non-interventional stance in the past.", '>>{RonaldDumbsfield} : I bet Trump owns a Troll Factory, and runs it like an evil Willy Wonka.', ">>{kap_fallback} : wtf kind of source is this? This isn't real political news, this is bottom tier trash.", ">>{kelshrc} : I remember watching that and thinking that it was satire. I had no idea she interviewed legitimate Russian trolls because why would they openly admit to it? The Russian troll thing is so interesting/terrifying. They used to always be in Trump's twitter mentions, but have considerably died down since he was inaugurated.", '>>{Bold-heart} : These trolls are active on Reddit too. Caveat lector.', '>>{Quinnjester} : hope someone catches it and puts it in think progress of Wapo.', '>>{DownWithAssad} : Here is the original, massive investigation, by one of Russia\'s leading investigative/business outlets: http://www.rbc.ru/magazine/2017/04/58d106b09a794710fa8934ac?from=subject Here\'s the FB group, whom a whopping 140,000 feeble-minded, brainwashed, partisan reactionaries are following like cultist sheep: https://www.facebook.com/Secured.Borders/ Here\'s one of the Twitter accounts they ran, "Tea Party News": https://twitter.com/tpartynews?lang=en'], ['>>{Trump_Hearts_Putin} : House Intelligence sets goals for Russia investigation, including potential Trump contacts', '>>{Trump_Hearts_Putin} : > House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and ranking member Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) released a summary of the investigations aims Wednesday evening. > > The main questions they\'ll focus on are: > > "What Russian cyber activity and other active measures were directed against the United States and its allies? Did the Russian active measures include links between Russia and individuals associated with political campaigns or any other U.S. Persons? What was the U.S. Government’s response to these Russian active measures and what do we need to do to protect ourselves and our allies in the future? What possible leaks of classified information took place related to the Intelligence Community Assessment of these matters?"', '>>{Claritypleas} : How about, "What contact did the Trump campaign have with Russian officials? When? What was discussed?" and most importantly, "How much did Trump know and when?"', '>>{neurocentricx} : > The second question in the scope agreement directly addresses this issue: **"Did the Russian active measures include links between Russia and individuals associated with political campaigns or any other U.S. Persons?"** This is the question I wanted answered most.', '>>{CommunismWillTriumph} : When are the Dems going to stop red baiting like the 1950s and actually start forming a new platform to win in 2018?', '>>{CassiopeiaStillLife} : Both of these things, simultaneously. We are large; we contain multitudes.', '>>{Trump_Hearts_Putin} : Chewing gum and walking at the same time is hard for some people. Most of us can manage though. Thanks for your concern trolling though.', '>>{AcerRubrum} : Lets see, we have a marijuana descheduling bill coming up in the house, Bernie is pushing bills that would lower the costs of healthcare through international price negotiation, and Senate democrats are working on an infrastructure package that doesnt rely on private third party contractors or toll roads. Id say theyre already showing their cards for 2018. Remember, for the past 8 years the GOP have basically campaigned on destroying Obamas legislation and legacy. Trump doesnt even have any meaningful legislation passed yet to oppose.', ">>{GoldenShowerDonnie} : Highlighting President Puppet's connections with Putin along with the way he's screwing over his moronic cult are quite a potent combo.", '>>{madusldasl} : That last question should be, "in what ways can we help encourage people to come forward with information vital to preserving our nation for its people and how can we better protect whistleblowers from undue prosecution from the subjects of the leaks?"', ">>{takeashill_pill} : It's not red baiting, they're not communists. This is potentially the biggest scandal in American history, it needs to be investigated down to the last detail. And IMO the Dem platform is fine, they just need better resource allocation (too much on ads and not enough on the ground.)", ">>{Hobophobic} : You know Nunes only caved because he was tipped off about the NYT story. I still wouldn't be surprised if he tried to bury it behind closed doors. His behavior indicates something unwholesome.", '>>{bleed_air_blimp} : I love how carefully crafted that question is to avoid mentioning Trump by name.', '>>{rk119} : And so will Washington Post and The Failing NY Times.', '>>{birdiesanders2016} : Well, we still do. Just not in the same capacity as we hoped. Bernie Sanders is the moral voice of this country.', '>>{jpell12} : Whoopsie Daisy - Nunes may have spoken too soon last week. Gosh I hope they implicate this idiot as well.', '>>{Cayde-187} : They are failing themselves right into a few dozen Peabodies.']]

classify and reply

['>>{phiwings} : >Sasser said Americans should have the freedom to live according to their own conscience without the force of government being used to punish those who disagree with government officials like Avakian. Does this mean that I would be defended if I refused to serve African-Americans in my establishment? Or Jews? Or women? What if conscience dictates that I should not do business with those people?', '>>{Inquisitivemind88} : Personally, I think private businesses should be free to serve or not serve whoever they want. The market will sort it out in the end.', '>>{Vesstair} : But I thought the election was rigged! /s', ">>{TacosEveryCorner} : I didn't know Wyoming and West Virginia had early voting.", '>>{AaronLynnYoung} : You can look at your news site of choice and the results bode the same. Hillary is winning some states, Trump is up in others.', ">>{1LT_Obvious} : And you know this is true because it's news to the *max*.", '>>{IDFSHILL} : http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/dont-read-too-much-into-early-voting/ Good article on this. Demographics is how to measure early voting success, I believe. Latino/female vote is **way** up this year, which is not a good sign for Trump.', '>>{TacosEveryCorner} : Sorry. I omitted /s since the early voting trends favor Clinton in all of those states while polls (not early voting) have shown a slight shift in his favor in FL and OH.', '>>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : If only the left would apply that same metric to Islam.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Sure, as long as they don't rely on public roads, or police officers, or take advantage of government benefits to run their business---then sure. Why should they benefit from the safety net we all provide if they refuse to provide service for the rest of us?", ">>{moleratical} : Oh, Newsmax is reporting this. I was going to believe the likes of NPR, NYT, WaPo, Fox, CNN ect, but now that newsmax is reporting I'm going to have to trust them. Now I'll just wait to hear Breitbart and Infowars to confirm.", ">>{Inquisitivemind88} : I'm not sure it necessarily follows that because the state provides a road then they should determine business practices. You could justify government intervention in anything that way. I can just imagine how that would go - 'Government shouldn't prevent gay people from marrying!' 'Oh yeah? Did you drive on a road today? Then shit up and accept the government diktat!' It's all a little bit silly, isn't it?", ">>{growyurown} : Bullied is a term that needs to be redefined. I learned in this election if you didn't agree and vote for hillary it was because you must be misogynist. If you disagreed with trump and his supporters you were bullying.", '>>{Granny_Weatherwax} : Only if he loses. Lol. What a crowd these kids are.', '>>{BobSeton} : This was no Brown v Topeka. The case was a waste of civic time, energy and money. It could have been handled at the local level by a beat cop. The bakery owners were targeted specifically by the gay couple because of their faith. It\'s ridiculous to extrapolate that into a Woolworth\'s lunch counter. "What if conscience dictates that I should not do business with those people?" If they owned a chain of nationwide bakeries that served thousands daily and ordered their employees to not serve gays you might have a point. But this was SJW harassment and instances like this should be handled on a case-by-case basis. Should Rabbis be forced to marry Catholics in their Synagogue? Should Hooter\'s be forced to hire 300lb men as waitstaff? Should hot nightclubs be forced to let shlubs like me in?', ">>{Antipathies} : News Max! When normal news just won't do.", ">>{BobSeton} : And deny you they are? They were born that way. It's bigoted to expect them to deny who they are. You should show more tolerance.", ">>{BobSeton} : Why is Bill Moyer's blog an acceptable source but not Todd Starnes?", '>>{princehal} : Holy Shit! NewsMax is still a thing????!!!!!', '>>{fruitgods} : Not to deny who they are and what they believe in but to keep it humble. Maybe to avoid situations in which possible discrimination like this occur.', '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : Not really. We pay for infrastructure---that they make use of.', '>>{phiwings} : >It could have been handled at the local level by a beat cop. No it couldn\'t have. No criminal law was broken, this is a civil case. >If they owned a chain of nationwide bakeries that served thousands daily and ordered their employees to not serve gays you might have a point. At what point would it be ok? 10 bakeries nation wide? 25? 50? At what point is the law going to be enforced? >But this was SJW harassment and instances like this should be handled on a case-by-case basis. And it was. >Should Rabbis be forced to marry Catholics in their Synagogue? 1. There is a huge difference between a member of clergy being asked to do something and a private citizen. 2. Who exactly is making the argument that they should? 3. Render onto Caesar that which is Caesar\'s >Should Hooter\'s be forced to hire 300lb men as waitstaff? Argued already. Read Title VII of the Civil Rights Act where it pertains to "bona fide occupational qualification". >Should hot nightclubs be forced to let shlubs like me in? Also argued already as nightclub entry is not a human right.', ">>{phiwings} : You do realize that doesn't work in real life, correct?", ">>{BobSeton} : None of that is remotely true. This could have and should have been handled and dismissed at the local level. SJW's went way over the top here to harass a small business for no good reason since no party was injured. Cases like these only serve to get more Republicans elected.", ">>{phiwings} : >None of that is remotely true. Which parts? You stated that the police should have been called, and I stated that no criminal law was broken so the police would not have been involved. >This could have and should have been handled and dismissed at the local level. SJW's went way over the top here to harass a small business for no good reason since no party was injured. Who are you to determine whether a party was injured? How do you know they are SJWs and not a couple who legitimately wanted a cake? Also, from Oregon's Civil Rights Division website: >Discrimination in Public Accommodation: A place of public accommodation is defined in state law as any place that offers the public accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges, whether in the nature of goods, services, lodging, amusements or otherwise. **It is illegal to discriminate in places of public accommodation** on the basis of race, sex (including pregnancy), **sexual orientation**, national origin, religion, marital status, physical or mental disability, or age (18 years of age and older). It does seem like Oregon's anti-discrimination statute was broken. So no, it wasn't going to be handled and dismissed at the local level.", ">>{BobSeton} : You stated that the police should have been called I did not. We're not going to be able to have a civil discussion if you put words in my mouth.", ">>{phiwings} : >This was no Brown v Topeka. The case was a waste of civic time, energy and money. **It could have been handled at the local level by a beat cop.** The bakery owners were targeted specifically by the gay couple because of their faith. It's ridiculous to extrapolate that into a Woolworth's lunch counter... We aren't going to have a discussion when you deny what you yourself said and accuse me of putting words in your mouth. Have a nice day.", '>>{BobSeton} : It could have been handled at the local level by a beat cop. You stated that the police should have been called These two are not the same. Nice try though.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Vesstair} : But I thought the election was rigged! /s', ">>{TacosEveryCorner} : I didn't know Wyoming and West Virginia had early voting.", '>>{AaronLynnYoung} : You can look at your news site of choice and the results bode the same. Hillary is winning some states, Trump is up in others.', ">>{1LT_Obvious} : And you know this is true because it's news to the *max*.", '>>{IDFSHILL} : http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/dont-read-too-much-into-early-voting/ Good article on this. Demographics is how to measure early voting success, I believe. Latino/female vote is **way** up this year, which is not a good sign for Trump.', '>>{TacosEveryCorner} : Sorry. I omitted /s since the early voting trends favor Clinton in all of those states while polls (not early voting) have shown a slight shift in his favor in FL and OH.', ">>{moleratical} : Oh, Newsmax is reporting this. I was going to believe the likes of NPR, NYT, WaPo, Fox, CNN ect, but now that newsmax is reporting I'm going to have to trust them. Now I'll just wait to hear Breitbart and Infowars to confirm.", '>>{Granny_Weatherwax} : Only if he loses. Lol. What a crowd these kids are.', ">>{Antipathies} : News Max! When normal news just won't do.", '>>{princehal} : Holy Shit! NewsMax is still a thing????!!!!!'], ['>>{phiwings} : >Sasser said Americans should have the freedom to live according to their own conscience without the force of government being used to punish those who disagree with government officials like Avakian. Does this mean that I would be defended if I refused to serve African-Americans in my establishment? Or Jews? Or women? What if conscience dictates that I should not do business with those people?', '>>{Inquisitivemind88} : Personally, I think private businesses should be free to serve or not serve whoever they want. The market will sort it out in the end.', '>>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : If only the left would apply that same metric to Islam.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Sure, as long as they don't rely on public roads, or police officers, or take advantage of government benefits to run their business---then sure. Why should they benefit from the safety net we all provide if they refuse to provide service for the rest of us?", ">>{Inquisitivemind88} : I'm not sure it necessarily follows that because the state provides a road then they should determine business practices. You could justify government intervention in anything that way. I can just imagine how that would go - 'Government shouldn't prevent gay people from marrying!' 'Oh yeah? Did you drive on a road today? Then shit up and accept the government diktat!' It's all a little bit silly, isn't it?", ">>{growyurown} : Bullied is a term that needs to be redefined. I learned in this election if you didn't agree and vote for hillary it was because you must be misogynist. If you disagreed with trump and his supporters you were bullying.", '>>{BobSeton} : This was no Brown v Topeka. The case was a waste of civic time, energy and money. It could have been handled at the local level by a beat cop. The bakery owners were targeted specifically by the gay couple because of their faith. It\'s ridiculous to extrapolate that into a Woolworth\'s lunch counter. "What if conscience dictates that I should not do business with those people?" If they owned a chain of nationwide bakeries that served thousands daily and ordered their employees to not serve gays you might have a point. But this was SJW harassment and instances like this should be handled on a case-by-case basis. Should Rabbis be forced to marry Catholics in their Synagogue? Should Hooter\'s be forced to hire 300lb men as waitstaff? Should hot nightclubs be forced to let shlubs like me in?', ">>{BobSeton} : And deny you they are? They were born that way. It's bigoted to expect them to deny who they are. You should show more tolerance.", ">>{BobSeton} : Why is Bill Moyer's blog an acceptable source but not Todd Starnes?", '>>{fruitgods} : Not to deny who they are and what they believe in but to keep it humble. Maybe to avoid situations in which possible discrimination like this occur.', '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : Not really. We pay for infrastructure---that they make use of.', '>>{phiwings} : >It could have been handled at the local level by a beat cop. No it couldn\'t have. No criminal law was broken, this is a civil case. >If they owned a chain of nationwide bakeries that served thousands daily and ordered their employees to not serve gays you might have a point. At what point would it be ok? 10 bakeries nation wide? 25? 50? At what point is the law going to be enforced? >But this was SJW harassment and instances like this should be handled on a case-by-case basis. And it was. >Should Rabbis be forced to marry Catholics in their Synagogue? 1. There is a huge difference between a member of clergy being asked to do something and a private citizen. 2. Who exactly is making the argument that they should? 3. Render onto Caesar that which is Caesar\'s >Should Hooter\'s be forced to hire 300lb men as waitstaff? Argued already. Read Title VII of the Civil Rights Act where it pertains to "bona fide occupational qualification". >Should hot nightclubs be forced to let shlubs like me in? Also argued already as nightclub entry is not a human right.', ">>{phiwings} : You do realize that doesn't work in real life, correct?", ">>{BobSeton} : None of that is remotely true. This could have and should have been handled and dismissed at the local level. SJW's went way over the top here to harass a small business for no good reason since no party was injured. Cases like these only serve to get more Republicans elected.", ">>{phiwings} : >None of that is remotely true. Which parts? You stated that the police should have been called, and I stated that no criminal law was broken so the police would not have been involved. >This could have and should have been handled and dismissed at the local level. SJW's went way over the top here to harass a small business for no good reason since no party was injured. Who are you to determine whether a party was injured? How do you know they are SJWs and not a couple who legitimately wanted a cake? Also, from Oregon's Civil Rights Division website: >Discrimination in Public Accommodation: A place of public accommodation is defined in state law as any place that offers the public accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges, whether in the nature of goods, services, lodging, amusements or otherwise. **It is illegal to discriminate in places of public accommodation** on the basis of race, sex (including pregnancy), **sexual orientation**, national origin, religion, marital status, physical or mental disability, or age (18 years of age and older). It does seem like Oregon's anti-discrimination statute was broken. So no, it wasn't going to be handled and dismissed at the local level.", ">>{BobSeton} : You stated that the police should have been called I did not. We're not going to be able to have a civil discussion if you put words in my mouth.", ">>{phiwings} : >This was no Brown v Topeka. The case was a waste of civic time, energy and money. **It could have been handled at the local level by a beat cop.** The bakery owners were targeted specifically by the gay couple because of their faith. It's ridiculous to extrapolate that into a Woolworth's lunch counter... We aren't going to have a discussion when you deny what you yourself said and accuse me of putting words in your mouth. Have a nice day.", '>>{BobSeton} : It could have been handled at the local level by a beat cop. You stated that the police should have been called These two are not the same. Nice try though.']]

classify and reply

['>>{cjmudd} : Sanders 2020 Just Became Much More Likely With Tom Perez as DNC Chair', ">>{6heismans} : I really would be shocked if he ran. But that would be really special if he did. He's just so old and campaigning is so stuff. Plus, he'd be the frontrunner this time. Which would make things much different.", ">>{dolphins3} : Probably, but I don't think I'd support him in the 2020 primary, myself.", ">>{thewalkingfred} : Why not have Bernie run and have him appoint a very solid and like minded vice-president in the somewhat likely case he doesn't make it through his first term? His age is certainly an issue at this point but we have Vice Presidents for a reason.", '>>{duckshoe2} : And why not give the most stressful job to an 80 year old? What could go wrong?', '>>{CraftBeerMountaineer} : Right lets appoint an old guy who might die of old age to a position where he takes over in the case another guy dies...good idea.', '>>{anon902503} : Democrats really need to look at history. Specifically their own history in the elections of 1968 and 1972.', ">>{tragikkBronson} : I mean, assuming he won this year, I'm sure he would have went up for reelection, no?", '>>{Fuck_Clintonism} : 79. And are you some kind of ageist?', '>>{duckshoe2} : Actuarial life expetancy would be 78, tops. Why run the guy for office if the likeliest outcome is death?', '>>{Fuck_Clintonism} : Or.how about the time they ran Wall Street Hillary and lost to the Celebrity Apprentice? That was way back 4 months ago.', ">>{thewalkingfred} : I'm not Hillary fan either but can you really attack her for being close to money and wall street when Trumps cabinet is worth approximately 8.8 Billion dollars of personal wealth? For context, the highest valued cabinet after Trump was George W. Bush at about 360 Million.", ">>{thewalkingfred} : I'm just saying Bernie and his message is very popular but his age is a major concern. If he picks a like-minded, likable, and younger Vice President it sorta mitigates the risk of Bernie's age.", '>>{Fuck_Clintonism} : Yes, I can. Screaming "but the Republicans" is a tired and failed excuse.', '>>{Fuck_Clintonism} : YOU were the one that made an ageist comment about him running. Can you not keep track of your own statements?', ">>{Fuck_Clintonism} : That's an average and varies based on a lot.of factors. Trump and Hillary aren't exactly young either, ageist.", ">>{thewalkingfred} : I didn't say anything like that. You are the one bringing up Hillary for some reason.", ">>{Fuck_Clintonism} : I'm response to comment about 68 and 72. Did you even bother to follow the thread or even so much know what you are talking about this point?"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{cjmudd} : Sanders 2020 Just Became Much More Likely With Tom Perez as DNC Chair', ">>{6heismans} : I really would be shocked if he ran. But that would be really special if he did. He's just so old and campaigning is so stuff. Plus, he'd be the frontrunner this time. Which would make things much different.", ">>{dolphins3} : Probably, but I don't think I'd support him in the 2020 primary, myself.", ">>{thewalkingfred} : Why not have Bernie run and have him appoint a very solid and like minded vice-president in the somewhat likely case he doesn't make it through his first term? His age is certainly an issue at this point but we have Vice Presidents for a reason.", '>>{duckshoe2} : And why not give the most stressful job to an 80 year old? What could go wrong?', '>>{CraftBeerMountaineer} : Right lets appoint an old guy who might die of old age to a position where he takes over in the case another guy dies...good idea.', '>>{anon902503} : Democrats really need to look at history. Specifically their own history in the elections of 1968 and 1972.', ">>{tragikkBronson} : I mean, assuming he won this year, I'm sure he would have went up for reelection, no?", '>>{Fuck_Clintonism} : 79. And are you some kind of ageist?', '>>{duckshoe2} : Actuarial life expetancy would be 78, tops. Why run the guy for office if the likeliest outcome is death?', '>>{Fuck_Clintonism} : Or.how about the time they ran Wall Street Hillary and lost to the Celebrity Apprentice? That was way back 4 months ago.', ">>{thewalkingfred} : I'm not Hillary fan either but can you really attack her for being close to money and wall street when Trumps cabinet is worth approximately 8.8 Billion dollars of personal wealth? For context, the highest valued cabinet after Trump was George W. Bush at about 360 Million.", ">>{thewalkingfred} : I'm just saying Bernie and his message is very popular but his age is a major concern. If he picks a like-minded, likable, and younger Vice President it sorta mitigates the risk of Bernie's age.", '>>{Fuck_Clintonism} : Yes, I can. Screaming "but the Republicans" is a tired and failed excuse.', '>>{Fuck_Clintonism} : YOU were the one that made an ageist comment about him running. Can you not keep track of your own statements?', ">>{Fuck_Clintonism} : That's an average and varies based on a lot.of factors. Trump and Hillary aren't exactly young either, ageist.", ">>{thewalkingfred} : I didn't say anything like that. You are the one bringing up Hillary for some reason.", ">>{Fuck_Clintonism} : I'm response to comment about 68 and 72. Did you even bother to follow the thread or even so much know what you are talking about this point?"]]

classify and reply

['>>{BaptizedInFire_} : Lawmaker in charge of Trump-Russia probe: No evidence, no special prosecutor', '>>{ocschwar} : Why doth treason prosper? For it it doth prosper, none dare call it treason.', '>>{TotsNotRussianSIGINT} : Good. Respected leader has revealed the truth. Everything fine now, nothing to worry about!', '>>{Evolve_or_Bye} : Media coverage of President Trump hitting a new low?', ">>{coffee_dude08} : And this is prior to Friday's developments. Donnie is toast.", '>>{Evolve_or_Bye} : Was it correct to imply Trump would be putin journalists to death? Thanks.', '>>{IdiocracyAmerica2016} : This is pure propaganda for their followers who can say they did something. This country is fucked.', '>>{arthurpaliden} : Which is exactly what his handlers told him to say: http://i.imgur.com/jQnFMdE.jpg', ">>{dread_beard} : Sabato has had her over 270 for ages, now. But her lead on Sabato's map is back up to post-convention levels.", ">>{conanthecnidarian} : No evidence except for this photo of his first choice for National Security Adviser sitting next to Putin at a dinner for the Russian state news source, with Hillary's other opponent Jill Stein sitting right across from the table. But yeah, I'm sure the 2016 election never came up.", ">>{Roseking} : Wasn't he one of the ones the white house contacted trying to make this go away?", '>>{flukz} : No, a new high. Every stupid thing he says and does is being covered.', ">>{dread_beard} : Sabato was just on CNN, too. Can't wait for the update Sunday night / Monday.", '>>{Special_Tay} : Nothing to see here, people. Move along. -Officer Barbrady, South Park Police', '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : Who the fuck are you asking, Trump or his mind readers?', ">>{jim25y} : I don't wanna watch a video. What does it say?", '>>{coffee_dude08} : Me either. [538](http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo) has Hillary up big too.', ">>{dagwood222} : Reporter asks why we're playing nice with Russia and points out that reporters tend to die there.", '>>{banana-viking} : They hunted the Clintons for years pouring $250 million dollars to look under every rock for some supposed real estate deal shadiness...... but hey, Russia subverted our election? Dude who cares?', '>>{5Eyz} : I hope reporters are looking into this guys finances ans campaign donors. Unbelievable.', '>>{tau-lepton} : The way this month started she could hit 400.', ">>{GoldenShowerDonnie} : Is he still office? Yes? They aren't hitting him hard enough.", ">>{bbiggs32} : They are trying to shit it down. Don't let them do it. Raise hell.", '>>{F22Rapture} : It literally might. Next are Georgia, Missouri, South Carolina, Indiana and fucking Texas. I doubt it goes further than that, but barring a Republican coup or some major Clinton scandal in the next 30 days, this election is entirely locked up.', ">>{cratermoon} : It's going to be the biggest electoral college rout since Bush v Dukakis", ">>{thenumber4xx} : Here's a quick summary of FOX news bullshit in this video: - FOX plays a clip of a CNN reporter asking a Trump supporter(?): Putin has possibly killed media in the past, Trump bends over backwards to support him and Russia. Trump is very critical of media as well and any news that's against him. Do you think this is a dangerous path for Trump to go down. - FOX then has 1 pundit say its outrageous to suggest Trump would kill journalists even though she doesn't say that.", ">>{thehoods} : Hopefully they never go back, but that's a pipe dream.", '>>{drugorexic} : Even though Issa himself called for one just this week?', '>>{BrodinBroOfOdin} : Can I ask what happened Friday? I must have missed it.', ">>{treerat} : So release Trump's tax returns so this issue can be put to rest without a large expensive Benghazi like series of investigations. Its not going away. We wont let it go away.", '>>{hammadurb} : I hope we get a reverse of the 1984 elections. That will show that this country is occupied by decent people who will not let a bigot run this country to the ground. The election is not locked up until election night. Everyone needs to go out and vote him out of oblivion.', ">>{OsamaBeenModdin} : Even though Indiana went blue in 2008, and I would like to see it happen again, I just can't see it happening this time. There are so many anti-Washington far right supporters voting this year. The only reason we went for Obama was the huge surge of young voters from the college towns (Bloomington, Lafayette and Indianapolis areas).", '>>{ivsciguy} : The Fox News coverage is hitting a new low....', ">>{IkastI} : Don't worry, Issa has already walked that shit back. They're all on the same page again. Utterly insane that there is no real outcry from republicans against a foreign nation influencing and infiltrating an election and the office of the president.", ">>{imperialclassdestroy} : The media always hounds the current President. Trump's support of Russia just gives them new ammunition, because delusional people like to think that Russia and Putin are some kind of evil and unholy entities that must be destroyed. When Trump suggested he'd ally with Russia back on the trail, the left acted pretty shocked.", '>>{IkastI} : Honestly, releasing taxes alone is not going to clear this all up.', ">>{mo60000} : Also his lead is shrinking now in Alaska according to 538. I don't think Utah will go blue on November 8th but the race may have tightened a bit in that state.", '>>{mo60000} : You also forgot Alaska. Hilary is losing by about the same margin in texas right now as in Alaska according to 538 thanks to gary johnson.', '>>{-ELaB-} : > Nunes said he had been briefed on a transcript of a phone call that former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn had with a Russian envoy after the election. He said he did not hear anything worrisome about that call.', ">>{foooood4thought} : > That will show that this country is occupied by decent people who will not let a bigot run this country to the ground Not quite.. This pussy comment will only get attention because it's so overt.. All his previous stuff is just as dumb and bad.", '>>{eyebeeleaf} : Give me a good reason why we should trust/ally Russia?', ">>{akronix10} : Because they can destroy every American city by breakfast. What's a good reason for all the hostilities towards Putin/Russia? Who in our government is behind it? Are there any opportunistic explanations for them to take this hostile position towards Russia? Some of us have been following the causes and conditions behind this US/Russian geopolitical relationship ***LONG before*** Trump came into the picture.", ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : In fairness, there hasn't been any huge routs since then.", '>>{plato1123} : He emits a gelatinous goo that really gives a circle jerk an extra sheen.', ">>{AnimZero} : Seemingly ever politician in Utah has denounced Trump as being the despicable human being he is, so it's possible.", '>>{imperialclassdestroy} : Because Russia is one of very few nations I\'d feel safe with leading the world or being in. Strongly conservative, strong economy, strong military, strong and stable leadership, lots of land and natural resources, etc etc, and anyone still worried about them "destroying the world" doesn\'t understand that the Cold War is over.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Evolve_or_Bye} : Media coverage of President Trump hitting a new low?', '>>{Evolve_or_Bye} : Was it correct to imply Trump would be putin journalists to death? Thanks.', '>>{flukz} : No, a new high. Every stupid thing he says and does is being covered.', '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : Who the fuck are you asking, Trump or his mind readers?', ">>{jim25y} : I don't wanna watch a video. What does it say?", ">>{dagwood222} : Reporter asks why we're playing nice with Russia and points out that reporters tend to die there.", ">>{GoldenShowerDonnie} : Is he still office? Yes? They aren't hitting him hard enough.", ">>{thenumber4xx} : Here's a quick summary of FOX news bullshit in this video: - FOX plays a clip of a CNN reporter asking a Trump supporter(?): Putin has possibly killed media in the past, Trump bends over backwards to support him and Russia. Trump is very critical of media as well and any news that's against him. Do you think this is a dangerous path for Trump to go down. - FOX then has 1 pundit say its outrageous to suggest Trump would kill journalists even though she doesn't say that.", '>>{ivsciguy} : The Fox News coverage is hitting a new low....', ">>{imperialclassdestroy} : The media always hounds the current President. Trump's support of Russia just gives them new ammunition, because delusional people like to think that Russia and Putin are some kind of evil and unholy entities that must be destroyed. When Trump suggested he'd ally with Russia back on the trail, the left acted pretty shocked.", '>>{eyebeeleaf} : Give me a good reason why we should trust/ally Russia?', ">>{akronix10} : Because they can destroy every American city by breakfast. What's a good reason for all the hostilities towards Putin/Russia? Who in our government is behind it? Are there any opportunistic explanations for them to take this hostile position towards Russia? Some of us have been following the causes and conditions behind this US/Russian geopolitical relationship ***LONG before*** Trump came into the picture.", '>>{plato1123} : He emits a gelatinous goo that really gives a circle jerk an extra sheen.', '>>{imperialclassdestroy} : Because Russia is one of very few nations I\'d feel safe with leading the world or being in. Strongly conservative, strong economy, strong military, strong and stable leadership, lots of land and natural resources, etc etc, and anyone still worried about them "destroying the world" doesn\'t understand that the Cold War is over.'], [">>{coffee_dude08} : And this is prior to Friday's developments. Donnie is toast.", ">>{dread_beard} : Sabato has had her over 270 for ages, now. But her lead on Sabato's map is back up to post-convention levels.", ">>{dread_beard} : Sabato was just on CNN, too. Can't wait for the update Sunday night / Monday.", '>>{coffee_dude08} : Me either. [538](http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo) has Hillary up big too.', '>>{tau-lepton} : The way this month started she could hit 400.', '>>{F22Rapture} : It literally might. Next are Georgia, Missouri, South Carolina, Indiana and fucking Texas. I doubt it goes further than that, but barring a Republican coup or some major Clinton scandal in the next 30 days, this election is entirely locked up.', ">>{cratermoon} : It's going to be the biggest electoral college rout since Bush v Dukakis", ">>{thehoods} : Hopefully they never go back, but that's a pipe dream.", '>>{BrodinBroOfOdin} : Can I ask what happened Friday? I must have missed it.', '>>{hammadurb} : I hope we get a reverse of the 1984 elections. That will show that this country is occupied by decent people who will not let a bigot run this country to the ground. The election is not locked up until election night. Everyone needs to go out and vote him out of oblivion.', ">>{OsamaBeenModdin} : Even though Indiana went blue in 2008, and I would like to see it happen again, I just can't see it happening this time. There are so many anti-Washington far right supporters voting this year. The only reason we went for Obama was the huge surge of young voters from the college towns (Bloomington, Lafayette and Indianapolis areas).", ">>{mo60000} : Also his lead is shrinking now in Alaska according to 538. I don't think Utah will go blue on November 8th but the race may have tightened a bit in that state.", '>>{mo60000} : You also forgot Alaska. Hilary is losing by about the same margin in texas right now as in Alaska according to 538 thanks to gary johnson.', ">>{foooood4thought} : > That will show that this country is occupied by decent people who will not let a bigot run this country to the ground Not quite.. This pussy comment will only get attention because it's so overt.. All his previous stuff is just as dumb and bad.", ">>{BedWedOrBehead} : In fairness, there hasn't been any huge routs since then.", ">>{AnimZero} : Seemingly ever politician in Utah has denounced Trump as being the despicable human being he is, so it's possible."], ['>>{BaptizedInFire_} : Lawmaker in charge of Trump-Russia probe: No evidence, no special prosecutor', '>>{ocschwar} : Why doth treason prosper? For it it doth prosper, none dare call it treason.', '>>{TotsNotRussianSIGINT} : Good. Respected leader has revealed the truth. Everything fine now, nothing to worry about!', '>>{IdiocracyAmerica2016} : This is pure propaganda for their followers who can say they did something. This country is fucked.', '>>{arthurpaliden} : Which is exactly what his handlers told him to say: http://i.imgur.com/jQnFMdE.jpg', ">>{conanthecnidarian} : No evidence except for this photo of his first choice for National Security Adviser sitting next to Putin at a dinner for the Russian state news source, with Hillary's other opponent Jill Stein sitting right across from the table. But yeah, I'm sure the 2016 election never came up.", ">>{Roseking} : Wasn't he one of the ones the white house contacted trying to make this go away?", '>>{Special_Tay} : Nothing to see here, people. Move along. -Officer Barbrady, South Park Police', '>>{banana-viking} : They hunted the Clintons for years pouring $250 million dollars to look under every rock for some supposed real estate deal shadiness...... but hey, Russia subverted our election? Dude who cares?', '>>{5Eyz} : I hope reporters are looking into this guys finances ans campaign donors. Unbelievable.', ">>{bbiggs32} : They are trying to shit it down. Don't let them do it. Raise hell.", '>>{drugorexic} : Even though Issa himself called for one just this week?', ">>{treerat} : So release Trump's tax returns so this issue can be put to rest without a large expensive Benghazi like series of investigations. Its not going away. We wont let it go away.", ">>{IkastI} : Don't worry, Issa has already walked that shit back. They're all on the same page again. Utterly insane that there is no real outcry from republicans against a foreign nation influencing and infiltrating an election and the office of the president.", '>>{IkastI} : Honestly, releasing taxes alone is not going to clear this all up.', '>>{-ELaB-} : > Nunes said he had been briefed on a transcript of a phone call that former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn had with a Russian envoy after the election. He said he did not hear anything worrisome about that call.']]

classify and reply

['>>{god_im_bored} : Donald Trump advisers should be prosecuted for treason if they colluded with Russia, says former Clinton staffer', '>>{DragonTHC} : Well, he has the best people. So they would have committed the best treason. And we have loads of circumstantial evidence which supports this. And they have shown over and again that they will lie under oath. Trump\'s administration makes no changes unless caught. These "best" people staffing the administration are anything but. A month in, literally half the white house staff was walked out of the white house for failing federal background checks. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/320008-wh-dismisses-six-staffers-for-not-passing-background-checks-report', ">>{Valmirah} : Oh.. they will be.... They're all going down.....", '>>{Mr_Billy} : The FBI said they are on it. That is one of the very few government agencies I still have faith in. The truth will come out eventually and half the country will still not believe it.', '>>{Vgatv} : Let\'s be honest, if trump had a "d" beside his name there would already have been a dozen investigations launched, impeachment proceedings started and treason charges filed', '>>{Disentingvoice} : So have they found any proof of this happening? They have been talking about this for months and looking in to it.', '>>{janzeera} : [in the Trump camp?](https://media.giphy.com/media/7cTTE2Z1OmrFm/giphy.gif)', '>>{Vgatv} : Trump allowed Flynn, someone who was being paid by Russia, to attend security briefings. How is that not an impeachable offense?', ">>{Vgatv} : Nah, they'd just impeach the president and vice president and install Ryan", '>>{oO0-__-0Oo} : I would prefer that the death penalty be carried out via public execution, although I am somewhat torn between preferring hanging from the neck until dead vs. firing squad.', ">>{Trainsandbrains} : How about the massive amounts of collusion between the Clinton's and Russia? Does he think they should be charged with treason? I'm guessing not.", '>>{Lamentati0ns} : [Hmmmmmm](http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-13/saudi-arabia-has-funded-20-hillarys-presidential-campaign-saudi-crown-prince-claims) [Oh](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/07/fact-checking-donations-clinton-foundation/) [Intersting](http://www.politifact.com/arizona/statements/2016/jul/11/donald-trump/did-hillary-clinton-take-money-countries-treat-wom/)', ">>{Vgatv} : You do realize there is a HUGE difference from a US ally donating to a charity and willingly putting someone being paid by the Russian Government in security briefings, don't you?", ">>{Lamentati0ns} : The charity goes to support a potential POTUS? How is that not a conflict of interests? We already have evidence of Flynn not being in his current (recent) position and nothing of jeopardy was said in the meeting. The topic of sanctions was brought up but no evidence suggests it was discussed. There also remains the technicality of him being put there intentionally by higher ups. Remember, he did not 'resign' because he discussed sanctions. He resigned because he lied about it. The meeting was not criminal.", '>>{Vgatv} : Yep, nothing criminal about colluding with a foreign government to impact the election. Nothing at all.....', '>>{mrpoops} : If someone did something illegal they should be held accountable. If that person is Hillary or if that person is Trump, doesn\'t matter. If Hillary is getting away with something that doesn\'t excuse Trump. The whole "what about Hillary?!" Or "what about Obama!?!" argument is dumb. It\'s a way for them to not have to answer for Trump\'s treasonous actions.', '>>{mrpoops} : If he discussed lifting sanctions it was absolutely illegal.', '>>{FiscalClifBar} : The charity buys drugs for poor children with AIDS.', ">>{Lamentati0ns} : What?! Are we still on Flynn or? Because if you're referring to Trump we still have no proof that collusion exists after 9 months of investigation. 5 months before election, during the election, and 4 months after the election show no proof of Russian involvement or Trump team collusion", ">>{Vgatv} : Yeah, I'm sure it's just a coincidence that a lot of his top advisors and former campaign manager has extensive ties to Russia. Yep, nothing to see here....", '>>{mrpoops} : I 100% agree. But they believe she did. And to that I say just because one person "got away with it" doesn\'t excuse anyone else.', ">>{Lamentati0ns} : And if they aren't breaking the law, what is the issue? Are we not meant to do foreign business? None of the members have been proven to behave illegally (which includes affecting the election outcomes) so what's the issue?", ">>{Vgatv} : Yeah, I mean it's not like the FBI has an active criminal investigation underway or anything..oh, wait...", '>>{someone447} : So we should have stopped investigating Watergate after 9 months? Because that investigation took **two years**.', '>>{Lamentati0ns} : [A two year investigation with mounds of evidence accumulated in the first few weeks](http://watergate.info/chronology) So if the Watergate scandal had zero evidence for the first 1/3 of the investigation, it would be an apt analogy. But it was very self evident, very early on, with loads of hard evidence. Trump is circumstantial conjecture with zero hard proof', '>>{electricmink} : Nice try, but folks can\'t "b-b-but Clinton" out of this one.', '>>{29624} : Since you have no defense you must agree Trump should be impeached.', '>>{Lamentati0ns} : What part of the law did Trump break? More so, what law did Flynn break? (please link)', ">>{someone447} : You mean like having someone who's consulting company was being paid by a Russian oligarch named ND? There is absolutely a growing mountain of evidence. No smoking gun has been leaked or released, but that isn't to say it hasn't been found. Even some of the GOP is beginning to turn on him. They would not have had Comey come in and testify that there was an investigation if they weren't making moves to protect themselves from the inevitable unraveling. They knew what was going to be said, members of both the house and Senate have been briefed on it, and if the GOP didn't know, or at the very least strongly suspect, a coming bombshell, they wouldn't have put Comey up there to announce Trump is under investigation. Not to mention, Roger Stone, a Trump team member has admitted to backchannel communications with wikileaks. More and more lies about Russian connections are coming to light on a daily basis. Quit pretending the investigation isn't turning anything up.", ">>{Lamentati0ns} : Trump is a business man and yes, has done business in Russia. That does not however, mean he is compromised by Russia. Unless that proof is shown, then he is innocent as far as the law is concerned. THATS IT! Connections aren't bad. There is no evidence of foul play, just that the DNC doesn't like the fact that the GOP is playing with Russia. There is no evidence of misplay in the election, preferential treatment of Russia, financial issues, bribery, or officials acting against the interests of America. Knowing Russians is not corruption. Acting illegally and against America is corruption", ">>{someone447} : There is tons of evidence that Russia interfered with the election. That is indisputable. What is being investigated now is whether anyone on the Trump team colluded with them. We have Roger Stone admitting he had communication with Wikileaks(which is now a propaganda branch of the Kremlin). We have multiple members of his campaign and transition team **lying** about Russian contacts. There is absolutely not enough to charge anyone yet, I won't dispute that. But quit lying about the investigation not turning up any evidence. There is new evidence coming out weekly. Which is why the investigation must continue. We can't just say, oh it's been 9 months and we don't have a smoking gun. Time to pack it in.", ">>{Lamentati0ns} : >There is tons of evidence that Russia interfered with the election. That is indisputable Okay, please share some of that evidence. Hahahaha, Wikileaks is now Russian? That is an absolute laugh. The closest thing to evidence is members having previously worked with Russia and even less having lied about it. Those who lied I will happily admit is wrong and hope they can be expunged. But there's been what? less than 10 who have shady dealings in an admin pushing thousands? I refuse to accept that a few bad apples taints the administration as a whole", '>>{katkill3r} : >Okay, please share some of that evidence. > >Hahahaha, Wikileaks is now Russian? I mean... that is verbatin what James Comey was saying yesterday. So... Yes?', '>>{playvoid} : The fucking irony. Clinton sold a fifth of our uranium to a Russian firm. Bill got paid 500k for a speech.', '>>{Crazedgeekgirl} : Could be only the FBI knows, they are investigating it I guess you could assume there must be a reason. And maybe the former Mi6 agent. We know that a transcript exists where Flynn talks about removing sanctions with the Russian Ambassador, and then lied that he did. We know Trump asked to remove the section about arming Ukraine from the GOP platform, and then lied that he did. We know Roger Stone knew about a wikileak leak a week before it happened, he was in contact with one of the hackers, and he also lied about it. It can take years for the FBI to do investigations, they started in July 2016. Hopefully the FBI Head is serious about the investigation, but with out an independent investigation as a back up plan, we may never know.', ">>{Lamentati0ns} : I'm pointing out the hypocrisy. You don't care about politicians being sponsored by other countries, you just hate Trump. Otherwise you would be attacking the organization that's taken hundreds of millions over the years, not the one with loose allegations to 20k", '>>{someone447} : >Okay, please share some of that evidence. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-government-officially-accuses-russia-of-hacking-campaign-to-influence-elections/2016/10/07/4e0b9654-8cbf-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html?utm_term=.4db304aba629 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/06/us/politics/document-russia-hacking-report-intelligence-agencies.html?_r=0 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/07/us-russia-dnc-hack-interfering-presidential-election https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/top-us-cyber-officials-russia-poses-a-major-threat-to-the-countrys-infrastructure-and-networks/2017/01/05/36a60b42-d34c-11e6-9cb0-54ab630851e8_story.html?utm_term=.1cdd35d0c380 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/26/dnc-email-leak-russian-hack-guccifer-2 http://www.npr.org/2016/12/12/505260062/mcconnell-differing-with-trump-says-he-has-highest-confidence-in-intel-agencies http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/06/intelligence-community-says-putin-ordered-campaign-to-influence-election-denigrate-clinton.html Enough? >Hahahaha, Wikileaks is now Russian? That is an absolute laugh. http://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/6/14179240/wikileaks-russia-ties And [here](https://np.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/51yeqr/wikileaks_hid_documents_showing_syrian_deposits/d7g8i73/) is a well-sourced reddit post that does a far better job than I', '>>{Stephen_Gawking} : Trump is just going to say it was light treason and not anything serious and that what Clinton did was way worse anyways.', ">>{Lamentati0ns} : Here you're changing the argument. You're now saying Trump met with Russia and lying about it which isn't the case. And when is it safe to assume he is not a traitor?", ">>{Lamentati0ns} : 1. Wikileaks has shown that the CIA has the power to forge 'digital fingerprints' of foreign nations. This raises a split on if it was American or Russian nationals that leaked the information. The second part of this being, would it be better that all the implications of the DNC dump not be shown to the public? In that dump there was proof of Middle East and Chinese massively funding the DNC, there was proof of Clinton officials making deals very much against the interests of America, and numerous DNC officials meeting with foreign entities to discuss the election. When would this information have been suitable to release to the public? 2. 25 pages of literally nothing. I've responded to this link several times and all it says is that they have reason to suspect Russian involvement but show no proof and do not specify in any capacity where the election was altered. 3. See number 1. This is again, the US saying Russia hacked them but gives no evidence. Putin says they did not. (he said she said scenario) 4. This is the same guy who, in the same hearing, stated that there is no evidence in their possession to prove Russian influence. Just claims that there was influence. 5. Funny how they seemed so sure on this guess 8 months ago, but have no evidence now. That story must have panned out to be wrong.", '>>{cheesybstrd} : Fun fact. Plan b will be abolished soon under President pence.', ">>{someone447} : Yet Mr. GOP first himself, Mitch McConnel agrees that Russia interfered with the election. Along with every member of Congress who has seen the classified Intel. Not only that, but this is all classic KGB attacks, and who was head of the KGB before becoming the Russian president? These are not coincidences, and the mental gymnastics you're doing to deny reality is astounding. If you want to say that there is no clear evidence of Trumps campaign colluding with Russia, I will respectfully disagree; but I can at least see where you're coming from. But to deny that there is evidence of Russian tampering is absurd and completely out of touch with reality.", ">>{Stephen_Gawking} : Clinton who? No one fuckin cares about the clintons now. We're out here fighting for kids and the elderly to have meals. The clintons have their ivory tower to go back to and live out the rest of their days in peace for all I care.", ">>{AstroVol} : Hmm. Pretty sure all of this is legal. Think you're missing the point, here.", ">>{MorbidMongoose} : > Whatabout(ism) the massive amounts of collusion FTFY. And in case you were serious, working with Russia is not collusion. Working with Russia to undermine the US government is. Yes, it's true no smoking gun has been revealed but you have to wonder that if it's all so innocent, why have they taken great pains to conceal their actions?", '>>{BuddsMcGee} : Coming from a clinton staffer, that is rather ironic.', ">>{WabiSabiWill} : Prosecute the whole fucking administration, they're all in on it as far as I can tell. Investigate every last one of those mother fuckers and confirm just how deep this bull shit goes.", '>>{BizaRhythm} : Wow that\'s really "intersting" Side note: do you run a pedophilia ring in your basement?', ">>{Trainsandbrains} : Maybe you don't but the Clinton's are criminals and don't get a magic get out of jail free card just because she lost the election. >We're out here fighting for kids and the elderly to have meals. Like how the CF used $3 million in Haiti relief money to pay for Chelsea's wedding? Bill Clinton is a rapist and Hillary is a fucking traitor. Lock em both up and throw away the key.", '>>{Homerpaintbucket} : Yo, I love the song by D12 My Band. [This is my favorite part](https://youtu.be/LCFz3isPdB4?t=4m5s)']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{god_im_bored} : Donald Trump advisers should be prosecuted for treason if they colluded with Russia, says former Clinton staffer', '>>{DragonTHC} : Well, he has the best people. So they would have committed the best treason. And we have loads of circumstantial evidence which supports this. And they have shown over and again that they will lie under oath. Trump\'s administration makes no changes unless caught. These "best" people staffing the administration are anything but. A month in, literally half the white house staff was walked out of the white house for failing federal background checks. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/320008-wh-dismisses-six-staffers-for-not-passing-background-checks-report', ">>{Valmirah} : Oh.. they will be.... They're all going down.....", '>>{Mr_Billy} : The FBI said they are on it. That is one of the very few government agencies I still have faith in. The truth will come out eventually and half the country will still not believe it.', '>>{Vgatv} : Let\'s be honest, if trump had a "d" beside his name there would already have been a dozen investigations launched, impeachment proceedings started and treason charges filed', '>>{Disentingvoice} : So have they found any proof of this happening? They have been talking about this for months and looking in to it.', '>>{janzeera} : [in the Trump camp?](https://media.giphy.com/media/7cTTE2Z1OmrFm/giphy.gif)', '>>{Vgatv} : Trump allowed Flynn, someone who was being paid by Russia, to attend security briefings. How is that not an impeachable offense?', ">>{Vgatv} : Nah, they'd just impeach the president and vice president and install Ryan", '>>{oO0-__-0Oo} : I would prefer that the death penalty be carried out via public execution, although I am somewhat torn between preferring hanging from the neck until dead vs. firing squad.', ">>{Trainsandbrains} : How about the massive amounts of collusion between the Clinton's and Russia? Does he think they should be charged with treason? I'm guessing not.", '>>{Lamentati0ns} : [Hmmmmmm](http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-13/saudi-arabia-has-funded-20-hillarys-presidential-campaign-saudi-crown-prince-claims) [Oh](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/07/fact-checking-donations-clinton-foundation/) [Intersting](http://www.politifact.com/arizona/statements/2016/jul/11/donald-trump/did-hillary-clinton-take-money-countries-treat-wom/)', ">>{Vgatv} : You do realize there is a HUGE difference from a US ally donating to a charity and willingly putting someone being paid by the Russian Government in security briefings, don't you?", ">>{Lamentati0ns} : The charity goes to support a potential POTUS? How is that not a conflict of interests? We already have evidence of Flynn not being in his current (recent) position and nothing of jeopardy was said in the meeting. The topic of sanctions was brought up but no evidence suggests it was discussed. There also remains the technicality of him being put there intentionally by higher ups. Remember, he did not 'resign' because he discussed sanctions. He resigned because he lied about it. The meeting was not criminal.", '>>{Vgatv} : Yep, nothing criminal about colluding with a foreign government to impact the election. Nothing at all.....', '>>{mrpoops} : If someone did something illegal they should be held accountable. If that person is Hillary or if that person is Trump, doesn\'t matter. If Hillary is getting away with something that doesn\'t excuse Trump. The whole "what about Hillary?!" Or "what about Obama!?!" argument is dumb. It\'s a way for them to not have to answer for Trump\'s treasonous actions.', '>>{mrpoops} : If he discussed lifting sanctions it was absolutely illegal.', '>>{FiscalClifBar} : The charity buys drugs for poor children with AIDS.', ">>{Lamentati0ns} : What?! Are we still on Flynn or? Because if you're referring to Trump we still have no proof that collusion exists after 9 months of investigation. 5 months before election, during the election, and 4 months after the election show no proof of Russian involvement or Trump team collusion", ">>{Vgatv} : Yeah, I'm sure it's just a coincidence that a lot of his top advisors and former campaign manager has extensive ties to Russia. Yep, nothing to see here....", '>>{mrpoops} : I 100% agree. But they believe she did. And to that I say just because one person "got away with it" doesn\'t excuse anyone else.', ">>{Lamentati0ns} : And if they aren't breaking the law, what is the issue? Are we not meant to do foreign business? None of the members have been proven to behave illegally (which includes affecting the election outcomes) so what's the issue?", ">>{Vgatv} : Yeah, I mean it's not like the FBI has an active criminal investigation underway or anything..oh, wait...", '>>{someone447} : So we should have stopped investigating Watergate after 9 months? Because that investigation took **two years**.', '>>{Lamentati0ns} : [A two year investigation with mounds of evidence accumulated in the first few weeks](http://watergate.info/chronology) So if the Watergate scandal had zero evidence for the first 1/3 of the investigation, it would be an apt analogy. But it was very self evident, very early on, with loads of hard evidence. Trump is circumstantial conjecture with zero hard proof', '>>{electricmink} : Nice try, but folks can\'t "b-b-but Clinton" out of this one.', '>>{29624} : Since you have no defense you must agree Trump should be impeached.', '>>{Lamentati0ns} : What part of the law did Trump break? More so, what law did Flynn break? (please link)', ">>{someone447} : You mean like having someone who's consulting company was being paid by a Russian oligarch named ND? There is absolutely a growing mountain of evidence. No smoking gun has been leaked or released, but that isn't to say it hasn't been found. Even some of the GOP is beginning to turn on him. They would not have had Comey come in and testify that there was an investigation if they weren't making moves to protect themselves from the inevitable unraveling. They knew what was going to be said, members of both the house and Senate have been briefed on it, and if the GOP didn't know, or at the very least strongly suspect, a coming bombshell, they wouldn't have put Comey up there to announce Trump is under investigation. Not to mention, Roger Stone, a Trump team member has admitted to backchannel communications with wikileaks. More and more lies about Russian connections are coming to light on a daily basis. Quit pretending the investigation isn't turning anything up.", ">>{Lamentati0ns} : Trump is a business man and yes, has done business in Russia. That does not however, mean he is compromised by Russia. Unless that proof is shown, then he is innocent as far as the law is concerned. THATS IT! Connections aren't bad. There is no evidence of foul play, just that the DNC doesn't like the fact that the GOP is playing with Russia. There is no evidence of misplay in the election, preferential treatment of Russia, financial issues, bribery, or officials acting against the interests of America. Knowing Russians is not corruption. Acting illegally and against America is corruption", ">>{someone447} : There is tons of evidence that Russia interfered with the election. That is indisputable. What is being investigated now is whether anyone on the Trump team colluded with them. We have Roger Stone admitting he had communication with Wikileaks(which is now a propaganda branch of the Kremlin). We have multiple members of his campaign and transition team **lying** about Russian contacts. There is absolutely not enough to charge anyone yet, I won't dispute that. But quit lying about the investigation not turning up any evidence. There is new evidence coming out weekly. Which is why the investigation must continue. We can't just say, oh it's been 9 months and we don't have a smoking gun. Time to pack it in.", ">>{Lamentati0ns} : >There is tons of evidence that Russia interfered with the election. That is indisputable Okay, please share some of that evidence. Hahahaha, Wikileaks is now Russian? That is an absolute laugh. The closest thing to evidence is members having previously worked with Russia and even less having lied about it. Those who lied I will happily admit is wrong and hope they can be expunged. But there's been what? less than 10 who have shady dealings in an admin pushing thousands? I refuse to accept that a few bad apples taints the administration as a whole", '>>{katkill3r} : >Okay, please share some of that evidence. > >Hahahaha, Wikileaks is now Russian? I mean... that is verbatin what James Comey was saying yesterday. So... Yes?', '>>{playvoid} : The fucking irony. Clinton sold a fifth of our uranium to a Russian firm. Bill got paid 500k for a speech.', '>>{Crazedgeekgirl} : Could be only the FBI knows, they are investigating it I guess you could assume there must be a reason. And maybe the former Mi6 agent. We know that a transcript exists where Flynn talks about removing sanctions with the Russian Ambassador, and then lied that he did. We know Trump asked to remove the section about arming Ukraine from the GOP platform, and then lied that he did. We know Roger Stone knew about a wikileak leak a week before it happened, he was in contact with one of the hackers, and he also lied about it. It can take years for the FBI to do investigations, they started in July 2016. Hopefully the FBI Head is serious about the investigation, but with out an independent investigation as a back up plan, we may never know.', ">>{Lamentati0ns} : I'm pointing out the hypocrisy. You don't care about politicians being sponsored by other countries, you just hate Trump. Otherwise you would be attacking the organization that's taken hundreds of millions over the years, not the one with loose allegations to 20k", '>>{someone447} : >Okay, please share some of that evidence. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-government-officially-accuses-russia-of-hacking-campaign-to-influence-elections/2016/10/07/4e0b9654-8cbf-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html?utm_term=.4db304aba629 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/06/us/politics/document-russia-hacking-report-intelligence-agencies.html?_r=0 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/07/us-russia-dnc-hack-interfering-presidential-election https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/top-us-cyber-officials-russia-poses-a-major-threat-to-the-countrys-infrastructure-and-networks/2017/01/05/36a60b42-d34c-11e6-9cb0-54ab630851e8_story.html?utm_term=.1cdd35d0c380 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/26/dnc-email-leak-russian-hack-guccifer-2 http://www.npr.org/2016/12/12/505260062/mcconnell-differing-with-trump-says-he-has-highest-confidence-in-intel-agencies http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/06/intelligence-community-says-putin-ordered-campaign-to-influence-election-denigrate-clinton.html Enough? >Hahahaha, Wikileaks is now Russian? That is an absolute laugh. http://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/6/14179240/wikileaks-russia-ties And [here](https://np.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/51yeqr/wikileaks_hid_documents_showing_syrian_deposits/d7g8i73/) is a well-sourced reddit post that does a far better job than I', '>>{Stephen_Gawking} : Trump is just going to say it was light treason and not anything serious and that what Clinton did was way worse anyways.', ">>{Lamentati0ns} : Here you're changing the argument. You're now saying Trump met with Russia and lying about it which isn't the case. And when is it safe to assume he is not a traitor?", ">>{Lamentati0ns} : 1. Wikileaks has shown that the CIA has the power to forge 'digital fingerprints' of foreign nations. This raises a split on if it was American or Russian nationals that leaked the information. The second part of this being, would it be better that all the implications of the DNC dump not be shown to the public? In that dump there was proof of Middle East and Chinese massively funding the DNC, there was proof of Clinton officials making deals very much against the interests of America, and numerous DNC officials meeting with foreign entities to discuss the election. When would this information have been suitable to release to the public? 2. 25 pages of literally nothing. I've responded to this link several times and all it says is that they have reason to suspect Russian involvement but show no proof and do not specify in any capacity where the election was altered. 3. See number 1. This is again, the US saying Russia hacked them but gives no evidence. Putin says they did not. (he said she said scenario) 4. This is the same guy who, in the same hearing, stated that there is no evidence in their possession to prove Russian influence. Just claims that there was influence. 5. Funny how they seemed so sure on this guess 8 months ago, but have no evidence now. That story must have panned out to be wrong.", '>>{cheesybstrd} : Fun fact. Plan b will be abolished soon under President pence.', ">>{someone447} : Yet Mr. GOP first himself, Mitch McConnel agrees that Russia interfered with the election. Along with every member of Congress who has seen the classified Intel. Not only that, but this is all classic KGB attacks, and who was head of the KGB before becoming the Russian president? These are not coincidences, and the mental gymnastics you're doing to deny reality is astounding. If you want to say that there is no clear evidence of Trumps campaign colluding with Russia, I will respectfully disagree; but I can at least see where you're coming from. But to deny that there is evidence of Russian tampering is absurd and completely out of touch with reality.", ">>{Stephen_Gawking} : Clinton who? No one fuckin cares about the clintons now. We're out here fighting for kids and the elderly to have meals. The clintons have their ivory tower to go back to and live out the rest of their days in peace for all I care.", ">>{AstroVol} : Hmm. Pretty sure all of this is legal. Think you're missing the point, here.", ">>{MorbidMongoose} : > Whatabout(ism) the massive amounts of collusion FTFY. And in case you were serious, working with Russia is not collusion. Working with Russia to undermine the US government is. Yes, it's true no smoking gun has been revealed but you have to wonder that if it's all so innocent, why have they taken great pains to conceal their actions?", '>>{BuddsMcGee} : Coming from a clinton staffer, that is rather ironic.', ">>{WabiSabiWill} : Prosecute the whole fucking administration, they're all in on it as far as I can tell. Investigate every last one of those mother fuckers and confirm just how deep this bull shit goes.", '>>{BizaRhythm} : Wow that\'s really "intersting" Side note: do you run a pedophilia ring in your basement?', ">>{Trainsandbrains} : Maybe you don't but the Clinton's are criminals and don't get a magic get out of jail free card just because she lost the election. >We're out here fighting for kids and the elderly to have meals. Like how the CF used $3 million in Haiti relief money to pay for Chelsea's wedding? Bill Clinton is a rapist and Hillary is a fucking traitor. Lock em both up and throw away the key.", '>>{Homerpaintbucket} : Yo, I love the song by D12 My Band. [This is my favorite part](https://youtu.be/LCFz3isPdB4?t=4m5s)']]

classify and reply

['>>{Illegal_sal} : Trump and Russians use same talking point to disparage CIA, Congress over hacks', '>>{alejo699} : The psychology of punishment is key to why people vote against their own interests, says an Oxford neuroscientist', '>>{ShotBot} : 5 year old a nervous wreck during Trump school visit', '>>{shittingorangeturds} : Wow, this was an interesting read. Thanks for posting!', '>>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : Yeah, there will probably be some asshole in the comments preemptively whining about everybody else or something like that.', '>>{Fatandmean} : Like a good puppet, lets the hand move the mouth.', '>>{2ndprize} : It was a totally adorable story with a super cute little girl until they got to the "the lady who wants to be president is bad and she steals" i have a 5 year old and she asks about the election but i dont tell her weird negative stuff like that about either candidate. I dont want my kids upset about the outcome of an election at this age', '>>{Ouroboros000} : But of course Trump and Putin were not collaborating on strategies to defeat the Democrats BEFORE the election.', '>>{HappyBroody} : I like the kid in glasses better 0 fucks given about Trump.', ">>{natalieilatan} : Don't forget WikiLeaks. The three of them are perfectly in sync these days on their talking points. RT -> Trump -> WikiLeaks", ">>{black_flag_4ever} : That's a sharp kid. She has really good vocabulary for that age.", ">>{DBDude} : I made a decision not to indoctrinate my then 10 year-old about Obama. Just listening to him speak she automatically didn't trust him. After she did more research, she really hated him. I tried to tell her he's really not that bad of a person, I just disagree with many of his policies and unsavory associations. She wouldn't have it, hated him. And no, Fox News is never playing in our house.", ">>{MissionStyle} : While I'm sure the answer is nothing, I wonder what kind of fallout would happen if a smoking gun was found.", '>>{FredFredrickson} : I would bet this has more to do with friends and their opinions (which *were* passed on by parents) rather than any independent research she did.', '>>{TheAustinKnight} : Half the population would still treat it as phony, especially if Fox/Breitbart tell them to.', ">>{2ndprize} : my daughter had an extremely easy time deciding who she wanted in this one. I was like there are 2 people (I'm not going to explain a 3rd party to her at this age), there is a man named Donald Trump and a woman named Hi.... that was all it took, she was going for the girl.", '>>{eat_fruit_not_flesh} : makes sense. republicans have been trying to punish blacks for being born black, gays for being born gay, poor people for being born poor, and women for being born women for decades.', '>>{MaiAyeNuhs} : Nothing to see here the TrumpenFuhrer will guide us with the 3 pillars of government Brietbart, Russia and Wikileaks!', ">>{dagwood222} : Trump voter logic. Screw myself and the world I leave my kids by making some assholes richer, because it'll piss off the liberals!", '>>{DBDude} : Not likely. Ten year-olds can be amazingly perceptive on their own.', ">>{DBDude} : >and a woman named Hi.... that was all it took, she was going for the girl. She didn't care for any of the candidates. She just really didn't like this one.", ">>{FredFredrickson} : Sorry, but I disagree. A 10 year old doesn't have the information of the worldly experience to be able to tell if a president is a good, reasonable person or not.", '>>{DrQAlias} : It\'s funny, the entire social conservative movement is based on punishment, too. Also their views on war, and immigration. And they want to punish poor people for being poor. Just not all cases, though- they want to reward people for having a lot of money. The difference from this study, though, is that Republicans all think punishment is the only tool needed to actually get things done, not just for feeling good about getting vengeance. It\'s a worldview. "If we make it feel bad enough they will do what I want, and if they still refuse I\'ll make them feel worse."', ">>{ThoseProse} : It's not a smoking gun. There is no smoke. It's a toy gun. How can a toy gun smoke. How can a toy gun smoke. Believe me folks. I won in the greatest landslide ever. Nobody knows smoking guns better than me. I've got a black person in Alabama and he said he uses smoking guns all the time. Smoking guns are safe. /s", '>>{2ndprize} : I think my daughter is just on the team girls are better than boys kick right now.', ">>{everred} : I was browsing their feed, they're desperate to turn the spotlight off or shine it at someone else.", '>>{Psy1} : While a interesting theory psychology is not the same as sociology. Psychology only studies the individual mind while sociology deals with how humans interacts in society. This phenomenon of punishment could be caused by US society thus why it would be nice for sociologists to study the 2016 election.', ">>{DBDude} : > A 10 year old doesn't have the information of the worldly experience to be able to tell if a president is a good, reasonable person or not. A 10 year-old can watch a person talk and get an idea of whether she trusts him. That's just good people skills. Then a little bit of reading then leads her to various unsavory things about him, and then she really doesn't like him.", ">>{DBDude} : Quite natural. BTW, she didn't like Palin much either. It wasn't distrust like Obama, just couldn't stand her. I think it was the voice, irritates the hell out of me too.", '>>{FredFredrickson} : Is it "good people skills" if she comes to a conclusion that most others would probably disagree with though? I mean, even you felt like her reaction was rather strong. I\'m a 34-year-old white man who grew up in a very conservative region of California, and I don\'t know anyone who *hates* Obama who hasn\'t also been exposed to all sorts of hyper-conservative propaganda against him.', '>>{bnffn} : In 5 more years this kid is gonna be wrecking havoc on the cyber.', ">>{skarphace} : Nixon to a pretty hard fall. Though I wasn't around for that.", ">>{eohorp} : He's one of the best spoken politicians we have, dudes story is bullshit.", ">>{northshore12} : It's okay because Reagan did it too!", ">>{MortWellian} : There's growing evidence that social conservatives have a different brain biology. Here's [Neil deGrasse Tyson](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAc8MKTjC5E) talking about higher reactions to fear. The brain can be an [odd place for some](http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/09/07/your-brain-on-politics-the-cognitive-neuroscience-of-liberals-and-conservatives/#.WJuVUTsrKCo).", ">>{FredFredrickson} : I don't want to call the guy a liar - I just doubt that his daughter was totally uninfluenced by anything other than observing the man speak.", ">>{eohorp} : I doubt he's so ignorant as to think his daughter came to that conclusion on her own. He's lying to himself if anything.", '>>{oddjam} : A lot of conservatives would have a knee jerk reaction to this, but you\'re right. There are more dedicate ways to word it, I\'m sure, but the mindsets of "fairness" and "punishment" are pretty central to a lot of their key positions. This is particularly true of American Republican voters.', '>>{MakeAmericanGrapes} : We saw this from some Bernie busters as well.', '>>{Ashley8777} : That mighy just be because so many live in the country and are less exposed to.. well... everything except raccoons.', '>>{FDRs_ghost} : Why else would we pay 1/2 to 1/3rd more for our healthcare and get worse outcomes when Universal/Single payer is an option ? Because poor people might get it "for free" and we can\'t have that. i don\'t know about you, but I was raised with the concept that if someone is worse off than me, I don\'t deliberately fuck with them to make their lives worse...but then maybe I\'m old and too decent.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Illegal_sal} : Trump and Russians use same talking point to disparage CIA, Congress over hacks', '>>{Fatandmean} : Like a good puppet, lets the hand move the mouth.', '>>{Ouroboros000} : But of course Trump and Putin were not collaborating on strategies to defeat the Democrats BEFORE the election.', ">>{natalieilatan} : Don't forget WikiLeaks. The three of them are perfectly in sync these days on their talking points. RT -> Trump -> WikiLeaks", ">>{MissionStyle} : While I'm sure the answer is nothing, I wonder what kind of fallout would happen if a smoking gun was found.", '>>{TheAustinKnight} : Half the population would still treat it as phony, especially if Fox/Breitbart tell them to.', '>>{MaiAyeNuhs} : Nothing to see here the TrumpenFuhrer will guide us with the 3 pillars of government Brietbart, Russia and Wikileaks!', ">>{ThoseProse} : It's not a smoking gun. There is no smoke. It's a toy gun. How can a toy gun smoke. How can a toy gun smoke. Believe me folks. I won in the greatest landslide ever. Nobody knows smoking guns better than me. I've got a black person in Alabama and he said he uses smoking guns all the time. Smoking guns are safe. /s", ">>{everred} : I was browsing their feed, they're desperate to turn the spotlight off or shine it at someone else.", ">>{skarphace} : Nixon to a pretty hard fall. Though I wasn't around for that.", ">>{northshore12} : It's okay because Reagan did it too!"], ['>>{ShotBot} : 5 year old a nervous wreck during Trump school visit', '>>{WeJustOrderedBisque} : Yeah, there will probably be some asshole in the comments preemptively whining about everybody else or something like that.', '>>{2ndprize} : It was a totally adorable story with a super cute little girl until they got to the "the lady who wants to be president is bad and she steals" i have a 5 year old and she asks about the election but i dont tell her weird negative stuff like that about either candidate. I dont want my kids upset about the outcome of an election at this age', '>>{HappyBroody} : I like the kid in glasses better 0 fucks given about Trump.', ">>{black_flag_4ever} : That's a sharp kid. She has really good vocabulary for that age.", ">>{DBDude} : I made a decision not to indoctrinate my then 10 year-old about Obama. Just listening to him speak she automatically didn't trust him. After she did more research, she really hated him. I tried to tell her he's really not that bad of a person, I just disagree with many of his policies and unsavory associations. She wouldn't have it, hated him. And no, Fox News is never playing in our house.", '>>{FredFredrickson} : I would bet this has more to do with friends and their opinions (which *were* passed on by parents) rather than any independent research she did.', ">>{2ndprize} : my daughter had an extremely easy time deciding who she wanted in this one. I was like there are 2 people (I'm not going to explain a 3rd party to her at this age), there is a man named Donald Trump and a woman named Hi.... that was all it took, she was going for the girl.", '>>{DBDude} : Not likely. Ten year-olds can be amazingly perceptive on their own.', ">>{DBDude} : >and a woman named Hi.... that was all it took, she was going for the girl. She didn't care for any of the candidates. She just really didn't like this one.", ">>{FredFredrickson} : Sorry, but I disagree. A 10 year old doesn't have the information of the worldly experience to be able to tell if a president is a good, reasonable person or not.", '>>{2ndprize} : I think my daughter is just on the team girls are better than boys kick right now.', ">>{DBDude} : > A 10 year old doesn't have the information of the worldly experience to be able to tell if a president is a good, reasonable person or not. A 10 year-old can watch a person talk and get an idea of whether she trusts him. That's just good people skills. Then a little bit of reading then leads her to various unsavory things about him, and then she really doesn't like him.", ">>{DBDude} : Quite natural. BTW, she didn't like Palin much either. It wasn't distrust like Obama, just couldn't stand her. I think it was the voice, irritates the hell out of me too.", '>>{FredFredrickson} : Is it "good people skills" if she comes to a conclusion that most others would probably disagree with though? I mean, even you felt like her reaction was rather strong. I\'m a 34-year-old white man who grew up in a very conservative region of California, and I don\'t know anyone who *hates* Obama who hasn\'t also been exposed to all sorts of hyper-conservative propaganda against him.', '>>{bnffn} : In 5 more years this kid is gonna be wrecking havoc on the cyber.', ">>{eohorp} : He's one of the best spoken politicians we have, dudes story is bullshit.", ">>{FredFredrickson} : I don't want to call the guy a liar - I just doubt that his daughter was totally uninfluenced by anything other than observing the man speak.", ">>{eohorp} : I doubt he's so ignorant as to think his daughter came to that conclusion on her own. He's lying to himself if anything."], ['>>{alejo699} : The psychology of punishment is key to why people vote against their own interests, says an Oxford neuroscientist', '>>{shittingorangeturds} : Wow, this was an interesting read. Thanks for posting!', '>>{eat_fruit_not_flesh} : makes sense. republicans have been trying to punish blacks for being born black, gays for being born gay, poor people for being born poor, and women for being born women for decades.', ">>{dagwood222} : Trump voter logic. Screw myself and the world I leave my kids by making some assholes richer, because it'll piss off the liberals!", '>>{DrQAlias} : It\'s funny, the entire social conservative movement is based on punishment, too. Also their views on war, and immigration. And they want to punish poor people for being poor. Just not all cases, though- they want to reward people for having a lot of money. The difference from this study, though, is that Republicans all think punishment is the only tool needed to actually get things done, not just for feeling good about getting vengeance. It\'s a worldview. "If we make it feel bad enough they will do what I want, and if they still refuse I\'ll make them feel worse."', '>>{Psy1} : While a interesting theory psychology is not the same as sociology. Psychology only studies the individual mind while sociology deals with how humans interacts in society. This phenomenon of punishment could be caused by US society thus why it would be nice for sociologists to study the 2016 election.', ">>{MortWellian} : There's growing evidence that social conservatives have a different brain biology. Here's [Neil deGrasse Tyson](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAc8MKTjC5E) talking about higher reactions to fear. The brain can be an [odd place for some](http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/09/07/your-brain-on-politics-the-cognitive-neuroscience-of-liberals-and-conservatives/#.WJuVUTsrKCo).", '>>{oddjam} : A lot of conservatives would have a knee jerk reaction to this, but you\'re right. There are more dedicate ways to word it, I\'m sure, but the mindsets of "fairness" and "punishment" are pretty central to a lot of their key positions. This is particularly true of American Republican voters.', '>>{MakeAmericanGrapes} : We saw this from some Bernie busters as well.', '>>{Ashley8777} : That mighy just be because so many live in the country and are less exposed to.. well... everything except raccoons.', '>>{FDRs_ghost} : Why else would we pay 1/2 to 1/3rd more for our healthcare and get worse outcomes when Universal/Single payer is an option ? Because poor people might get it "for free" and we can\'t have that. i don\'t know about you, but I was raised with the concept that if someone is worse off than me, I don\'t deliberately fuck with them to make their lives worse...but then maybe I\'m old and too decent.']]

classify and reply

['>>{Wynward} : The empowered alt-right trolls have created a cesspit on Twitter', '>>{ashstronge} : >To say liberals are hypocritical and inconsistent is an understatement of nearly biblical proportions Yes, this guy sounds reasoned and intelligent. This is the FIRST line of the article.', '>>{LeMot-Juste} : Raise your hands. Who believes little Don Don on this?', ">>{Highfibercarpet} : If the statement was made by any of the Trump family, don't believe it.", '>>{MBAMBA0} : Wow - this adds a lot of weight to my hunch Donald Sr. is on the verge of a complete emotional breakdown if Jr. is distancing himself publicly like this. Either that or there is a power play going on with the older boys and Ivanka/Jared.', '>>{pm_me_your_cuck_pics} : I wasn\'t able to read the article because ads on this shitty blog hijacked my browser and redirected me to one of those "download this" websites. Malware warning.', '>>{loungeboy79} : Wow, even his family is trying to separate from him, less than 2 months into the presidency. He is THAT corrupt. I wonder if they know more russia info is about to drop.', '>>{PuffPuff74} : I have zero contact with my father. Everything goes through Ivanka.', ">>{dangzal} : Amazon's newest Fire TV stick comes with an Alexa-enabled remote", ">>{albanydigital} : And goes on to cite the upstanding model of journalistic integrity James O'Keefe.", '>>{raised_by_wolves__} : Ohhhh...he has a good strategy. Nail them with the truth straight out of the gate. This is a difficult concept for you to understand. Liberals lie and talk in circles even when the truth would suit them better.', ">>{FlyingSquid} : I wonder if there's a 'lewd' tape of the time Allen West tortured a man in Iraq. He had to resign from the Army to avoid a court martial over it.", '>>{CadetPeepers} : To be fair, Twitter has always been a cesspit. ...All social media, really.', '>>{anon902503} : I actually do. I always assumed Donald was a horrible father who did not care about his kids except to use them as props.', ">>{jafomatic} : I'm sure her digestive tract doesn't work _that_ fast.", '>>{coursecatalog} : Shattering norms, unleashing demons, counting on the grown ups to rein them back in. But the grown ups are gone.', '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : These people are pretty much the worst thing about this election, and the fact that they now are basically coming out onto the streets proud of their bigotry is scary as shit.', ">>{I_Love_McRibs} : Now that a new one is out, I'd be happy to buy some of the previous generation for dirt cheap. I have no interest in it being Alexa-enabled.", '>>{Kuro207} : >In the video, Wylie Mao, a field organizer for the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic Party of Florida in West Palm Beach is caught on camera saying... Yep... typical liberal hypocrisy, not equating something said by a local field organizer with an admission of sexual assault by the *actual candidate*. /s', ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : I'm sure this increased attention and the fear with which people speak of them will encourage the trolls to end their efforts to get an emotional reaction out of people.", '>>{GoodOnYouOnAccident} : At this point when I see the word "Hillary\'s" I instinctively assume that it actually has nothing to do with Hillary. Oh, some no-name intern said "grab her ass?" Okay, fire them. They\'re not running for President. Donald Trump is, and will likely always be, the only candidate who has confessed to being a sexual predator.', '>>{Apocalypse-Wow} : Since when is Trump associated with being truthful? Blow it out your ass, jr', ">>{battlecows9} : For me, it's all about the new hardware. It's already so small, so the speed could be an issue but the new one has a quad processor, an upgrade from the old fire stick. The new wifi hardware is also useful for folks that have faster wifi.", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Sure, but Don Don controls the Trump empire now. Seeing as he is traveling to places, at our expense, that suddenly roll in favor of some Trump licensing deal, do you really believe his father isn't having contact with little Don Don to tell him what the next target should be?", ">>{LastDawnOfMan} : I was expecting Hillary to be saying something awful. She's nowhere in the video. Just some guy who supposedly works for the campaign. Good thing that guy isn't running for president, I wouldn't vote for him.", '>>{evanstueve} : Was always really impressed with the original Fire TV stick. I prefer it over chromecast, Apple TV, and all the others. Instant pre-order for me.', '>>{evil420pimp} : Coming down from the trees was a big mistake.', ">>{dio_affogato} : And everywhere else. They're roaming the streets like little frothing gremlins.", ">>{BefallenTragedy} : Are you comparing something a random staffer said to something said by the Republican nominee for President? I know you all are desperate, but c'mon. Diddlin' Donnie is done. Give it up.", ">>{TheMovingFinger} : >I basically have zero contact' with my father …who never tells the truth about anything. So why believe the son?", '>>{BlazedAndConfused} : I have the old voice remotes and an echo in the living room. my remotes already work with alexa. this is a bullshit article. shit already works with her...', '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : Ie, trump is still running everything. Liars.', ">>{heymonkeygobananas} : Shouldn't be an issue about contact but of what kind of contact that it was. But since it can never be verified they have to say this. I'm sure Trump c/o are gonna benefit bigly on the precedency and that isn't worthy of the office, as I see it. I don't understand America on this.", ">>{dio_affogato} : This. As much as I despise the man, Donald himself is probably more liberal than most of the Republican field of candidates on quite a few issues, and on some others he's walking back already. But the fucking sexual assault stuff, the racism, the islamophobia, all that talk has got the worst of the worst all giddy with hateful glee.", '>>{BlazedAndConfused} : Uhhh yeah..I did > and now comes bundled with an "Alexa" remote, which lets you use voice search to find stuff to watch. I\'ve been doing this for fucking months. I have 2 remotes, and I can speak to Alexa through them already. She does a ton of shit. What this article means to say is they\'ve upgraded Alexa integration on the latest generation to include additional skills, too. Shitty article.', '>>{kekus_vult} : He doesnt even need contact for the apperance of impropriety.', '>>{ashstronge} : >Liberals lie and talk in circles even when the truth would suit them better. Assigning character traits to an entire ideology (whether it be liberals or "the left) is usually a sign that you are trying to dismiss their arguments without actually addressing any of the substance or issues. Its a very lazy way of arguing and suggests to me that there is no rebuttal to the original point.', '>>{hatramroany} : It comes with the Alexa remote now. The former $40 option did not. "Now comes bundled" is what it says. Never says anything about it being newly capable. Shitty reading comprehension.', ">>{Farcrypanda} : Yeah it says so in the article: >The stick costs $40, the same price as the previous model, but now includes the voice remote, which used to cost an additional $10. It's not far down, did you not see it?", ">>{Loffler} : I have half a mind to walk away and just let them have it. I used to think the_donald was just an annoyance, something I'd have to scroll past when I decide to go to /r/all. Now when I look at it, there's this weird Pyongyang vibe to the whole thing. They were always disturbingly cultish, but that was before the guy had any power at all. It was kinda cute that they had their little fan club where everyone was so enthusiastic. But now, it's a little concerning that Reddit now has a platform where you're only allowed to say nice things about the President, and questioning his actions is worthy of a ban. Of course that's just one dark corner of Reddit, but they game the voting algorithm to shove their bullshit into everyone's face.", '>>{BREXIT-THEN-TRUMP} : I guess /r/politics is finally admitting there is a silent majority of Trump supporters?', '>>{Icouldbeanyone} : Is there a lawsuit against Donald or Jr that is pending because of the claim of "no contact" between the two? I think in North Carolina, or South. I recall reading it somewhere on here. Thought this title was apt to that.', ">>{jschild} : Is there even one video O'Keefe has produced that turned out not to be edited into lies?", '>>{MBAMBA0} : The stark difference in self-assuredness and seeming comfort-in-their-own skin between Ivanka vs. Donald Jr. & Eric suggests to me that dad was outright abusive to the boys. There are alpha male types who feel very threatened by their sons and so beat them down emotionally, physically or both.', '>>{Loffler} : Probably not, since half the country didn\'t bother showing up, and he couldn\'t even get a majority of the people who did. Maybe instead of "silent majority" it should be "just enough of them in the right states."', '>>{IronTagger} : I say we let them run wild. The more people see how sexist and racist they are, the less people will want to associate with Trump.', ">>{mrthatman5161} : She won't fire him. That's the problem. campaign is full of that stuff", ">>{deeluna} : He probably means that he already had a voice remote and that it worked fine with the previous generation stick and that the article didn't mention that the software has been available (and likely installed) on previous generations of the stick.", '>>{philly47} : If it makes you feel better, most of them are obese virgins. This is a well-known fact about the alt-right.', '>>{imnotboo} : That and porn in the top 25. If reddit does not get a handle on it, this could be DIGG part 2.', '>>{4D_MemeKing} : no, it\'s not. You\'re certainly "full of that stuff" though', '>>{BaumerS4} : Insinuating that Dylan Roof is a hero? Who would idolize a cowardly murder?!?', ">>{komes_grudz} : Can you explain what you like about it? I'm an Apple TV user. Ive tried the fire stick before, but I don't think I spent enough time with it to actually find its appeal.", '>>{foolmanchoo} : James O’Keefe the paragon of truth and ethical reporting.', ">>{evanstueve} : Basically, it feels just as intuitive to use as the Apple TV, but it doesn't rope in with iTunes Store. It's also $30. It plugs directly into the TV so you don't have to hide or mount it.", ">>{GoodOnYouOnAccident} : Nobody has ever leaked the internals of a campaign more than Hillary's. The fact that this is all anyone can find is actually pretty reassuring. Meanwhile, Donald Trump admits to being an uncontrollable sex predator when he knows he's being recorded; can you imagine what he says when he thinks he's in private?", '>>{TheGreatWolfRuss} : Using emotional buzz words like "liberals" just points out your incredibly small worldview. It might even be smaller than Trump\'s hands or his chances to win the presidential election.', '>>{Ulaven} : From Allen B. West, the man who by all rights should be in prison for war crimes. Someone takes anything this idiot promotes seriously?', '>>{charzhazha} : This submission is garbage but the title is not really editorialized.', ">>{BaumerS4} : Murder innocent people at church? That doesn't take balls. It's pathetic and a sorry excuse for a human being.", ">>{raised_by_wolves__} : Come on. 'liberals' is not an emotional buzz word.", '>>{TheGreatWolfRuss} : When you use it as "everyone that disagrees with me" it is.', ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Hey look, it's u/BREXIT-THEN-TRUMP, still complaining about r/politics while spending all his time, perhaps even 40 hours a week, browsing r/politics.", ">>{Pences_Rentboy} : /r/altright was featured on r/subredditoftheday. Reddit is sinking and I'm almost thrilled to watch it go. I hope the admins lose everything.", '>>{foolmanchoo} : Yes.. also known for producing the ~~widely acclaimed~~ fraudulent/fake, chopping babies up to sell body parts documentary. Cream of the Deplorables crop.', '>>{Loffler} : Oh nice, the "everyone I don\'t like agrees with each other" fallacy. Let me guess, Hitler was a leftist too??', ">>{987f} : I'm really sick of people intentionally misinterpreting things to rile up their readers and earn advertising revenue.", ">>{very-well} : As far as I'm concerned it's an alt-right website. Good riddance. Let the bigots and trolls take over the site. Enjoy the swamp.", '>>{Emperor_Cheetohito} : The alt-right is changing their political slurs now. They\'re dropping "liberal" as a slur and replacing it with leftist/socialist/progressive because those words still have an inflammatory connotation to them that hasn\'t yet been refuted as much "liberal" has by now. New buzzwords incoming. Stay woke.', '>>{Ulaven} : We liberals are all for free speech. It makes it easy to identify the knuckle dragging mouth breathers on the right.', ">>{uma100} : If you're on twitter and you come across these people, report them. Twitter will investigate and shut their account down if their behavior warrants it. Same with reddit, don't give them a chance to spread their hate and normalize their ideas in the public sphere.", '>>{zdf42qgv} : >knuckle dragging mouth breathers on the right. sour grapes', '>>{zdf42qgv} : hows it feel to lose to knuckle dragging mouth breathers?', '>>{Alexanderdaawesome} : well a liberal was elected president. Trump said he will protect roe v. wade', '>>{Ulaven} : When they finally figure out that they elected someone who used them like a two dollar whore and has no intention of making good on his promises? It will be glorious. The dupes got duped, and identified themselves in the process.', ">>{Brannagain} : >Last time I checked, it was the Left bringing out their bigotry to the streets. Protesting doesn't equal bigotry in the streets, but hey - let's bring up that time a group of guys beat up a Trump supporter.", ">>{Angeleno88} : To be fair, it's easy to just make a new email and account. It's just a temporary measure and wouldn't really work if they are determined.", ">>{Angeleno88} : Like what? I've interacted with the alt-right folks plenty and they are just as horrible as the article claims. Actually, probably even worse.", '>>{fckingmiracles} : Yes. The head mod of /r/subredditoftheday made it very clear what side he was on when he made KiA the sub of the day back then when they were actively trolling and doxxing game devs still. GG supporters were the trailblazers of the alt-right online.', '>>{SomeoneWithOpinions} : So what will the cowards running Twitter do about this?', ">>{987f} : That's how the internet has always been. Welcome to the real world."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{ashstronge} : >To say liberals are hypocritical and inconsistent is an understatement of nearly biblical proportions Yes, this guy sounds reasoned and intelligent. This is the FIRST line of the article.', '>>{pm_me_your_cuck_pics} : I wasn\'t able to read the article because ads on this shitty blog hijacked my browser and redirected me to one of those "download this" websites. Malware warning.', ">>{albanydigital} : And goes on to cite the upstanding model of journalistic integrity James O'Keefe.", '>>{raised_by_wolves__} : Ohhhh...he has a good strategy. Nail them with the truth straight out of the gate. This is a difficult concept for you to understand. Liberals lie and talk in circles even when the truth would suit them better.', ">>{FlyingSquid} : I wonder if there's a 'lewd' tape of the time Allen West tortured a man in Iraq. He had to resign from the Army to avoid a court martial over it.", '>>{Kuro207} : >In the video, Wylie Mao, a field organizer for the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic Party of Florida in West Palm Beach is caught on camera saying... Yep... typical liberal hypocrisy, not equating something said by a local field organizer with an admission of sexual assault by the *actual candidate*. /s', '>>{GoodOnYouOnAccident} : At this point when I see the word "Hillary\'s" I instinctively assume that it actually has nothing to do with Hillary. Oh, some no-name intern said "grab her ass?" Okay, fire them. They\'re not running for President. Donald Trump is, and will likely always be, the only candidate who has confessed to being a sexual predator.', ">>{LastDawnOfMan} : I was expecting Hillary to be saying something awful. She's nowhere in the video. Just some guy who supposedly works for the campaign. Good thing that guy isn't running for president, I wouldn't vote for him.", ">>{BefallenTragedy} : Are you comparing something a random staffer said to something said by the Republican nominee for President? I know you all are desperate, but c'mon. Diddlin' Donnie is done. Give it up.", '>>{ashstronge} : >Liberals lie and talk in circles even when the truth would suit them better. Assigning character traits to an entire ideology (whether it be liberals or "the left) is usually a sign that you are trying to dismiss their arguments without actually addressing any of the substance or issues. Its a very lazy way of arguing and suggests to me that there is no rebuttal to the original point.', ">>{jschild} : Is there even one video O'Keefe has produced that turned out not to be edited into lies?", ">>{mrthatman5161} : She won't fire him. That's the problem. campaign is full of that stuff", '>>{4D_MemeKing} : no, it\'s not. You\'re certainly "full of that stuff" though', '>>{foolmanchoo} : James O’Keefe the paragon of truth and ethical reporting.', ">>{GoodOnYouOnAccident} : Nobody has ever leaked the internals of a campaign more than Hillary's. The fact that this is all anyone can find is actually pretty reassuring. Meanwhile, Donald Trump admits to being an uncontrollable sex predator when he knows he's being recorded; can you imagine what he says when he thinks he's in private?", '>>{TheGreatWolfRuss} : Using emotional buzz words like "liberals" just points out your incredibly small worldview. It might even be smaller than Trump\'s hands or his chances to win the presidential election.', '>>{Ulaven} : From Allen B. West, the man who by all rights should be in prison for war crimes. Someone takes anything this idiot promotes seriously?', '>>{charzhazha} : This submission is garbage but the title is not really editorialized.', ">>{raised_by_wolves__} : Come on. 'liberals' is not an emotional buzz word.", '>>{TheGreatWolfRuss} : When you use it as "everyone that disagrees with me" it is.', '>>{foolmanchoo} : Yes.. also known for producing the ~~widely acclaimed~~ fraudulent/fake, chopping babies up to sell body parts documentary. Cream of the Deplorables crop.'], ['>>{Wynward} : The empowered alt-right trolls have created a cesspit on Twitter', '>>{CadetPeepers} : To be fair, Twitter has always been a cesspit. ...All social media, really.', '>>{coursecatalog} : Shattering norms, unleashing demons, counting on the grown ups to rein them back in. But the grown ups are gone.', '>>{AndrewRyansRapture} : These people are pretty much the worst thing about this election, and the fact that they now are basically coming out onto the streets proud of their bigotry is scary as shit.', ">>{RajivFernanDatBribe} : I'm sure this increased attention and the fear with which people speak of them will encourage the trolls to end their efforts to get an emotional reaction out of people.", '>>{evil420pimp} : Coming down from the trees was a big mistake.', ">>{dio_affogato} : And everywhere else. They're roaming the streets like little frothing gremlins.", ">>{dio_affogato} : This. As much as I despise the man, Donald himself is probably more liberal than most of the Republican field of candidates on quite a few issues, and on some others he's walking back already. But the fucking sexual assault stuff, the racism, the islamophobia, all that talk has got the worst of the worst all giddy with hateful glee.", ">>{Loffler} : I have half a mind to walk away and just let them have it. I used to think the_donald was just an annoyance, something I'd have to scroll past when I decide to go to /r/all. Now when I look at it, there's this weird Pyongyang vibe to the whole thing. They were always disturbingly cultish, but that was before the guy had any power at all. It was kinda cute that they had their little fan club where everyone was so enthusiastic. But now, it's a little concerning that Reddit now has a platform where you're only allowed to say nice things about the President, and questioning his actions is worthy of a ban. Of course that's just one dark corner of Reddit, but they game the voting algorithm to shove their bullshit into everyone's face.", '>>{BREXIT-THEN-TRUMP} : I guess /r/politics is finally admitting there is a silent majority of Trump supporters?', '>>{Loffler} : Probably not, since half the country didn\'t bother showing up, and he couldn\'t even get a majority of the people who did. Maybe instead of "silent majority" it should be "just enough of them in the right states."', '>>{IronTagger} : I say we let them run wild. The more people see how sexist and racist they are, the less people will want to associate with Trump.', '>>{philly47} : If it makes you feel better, most of them are obese virgins. This is a well-known fact about the alt-right.', '>>{imnotboo} : That and porn in the top 25. If reddit does not get a handle on it, this could be DIGG part 2.', '>>{BaumerS4} : Insinuating that Dylan Roof is a hero? Who would idolize a cowardly murder?!?', ">>{BaumerS4} : Murder innocent people at church? That doesn't take balls. It's pathetic and a sorry excuse for a human being.", ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Hey look, it's u/BREXIT-THEN-TRUMP, still complaining about r/politics while spending all his time, perhaps even 40 hours a week, browsing r/politics.", ">>{Pences_Rentboy} : /r/altright was featured on r/subredditoftheday. Reddit is sinking and I'm almost thrilled to watch it go. I hope the admins lose everything.", '>>{Loffler} : Oh nice, the "everyone I don\'t like agrees with each other" fallacy. Let me guess, Hitler was a leftist too??', ">>{987f} : I'm really sick of people intentionally misinterpreting things to rile up their readers and earn advertising revenue.", ">>{very-well} : As far as I'm concerned it's an alt-right website. Good riddance. Let the bigots and trolls take over the site. Enjoy the swamp.", '>>{Emperor_Cheetohito} : The alt-right is changing their political slurs now. They\'re dropping "liberal" as a slur and replacing it with leftist/socialist/progressive because those words still have an inflammatory connotation to them that hasn\'t yet been refuted as much "liberal" has by now. New buzzwords incoming. Stay woke.', '>>{Ulaven} : We liberals are all for free speech. It makes it easy to identify the knuckle dragging mouth breathers on the right.', ">>{uma100} : If you're on twitter and you come across these people, report them. Twitter will investigate and shut their account down if their behavior warrants it. Same with reddit, don't give them a chance to spread their hate and normalize their ideas in the public sphere.", '>>{zdf42qgv} : >knuckle dragging mouth breathers on the right. sour grapes', '>>{zdf42qgv} : hows it feel to lose to knuckle dragging mouth breathers?', '>>{Alexanderdaawesome} : well a liberal was elected president. Trump said he will protect roe v. wade', '>>{Ulaven} : When they finally figure out that they elected someone who used them like a two dollar whore and has no intention of making good on his promises? It will be glorious. The dupes got duped, and identified themselves in the process.', ">>{Brannagain} : >Last time I checked, it was the Left bringing out their bigotry to the streets. Protesting doesn't equal bigotry in the streets, but hey - let's bring up that time a group of guys beat up a Trump supporter.", ">>{Angeleno88} : To be fair, it's easy to just make a new email and account. It's just a temporary measure and wouldn't really work if they are determined.", ">>{Angeleno88} : Like what? I've interacted with the alt-right folks plenty and they are just as horrible as the article claims. Actually, probably even worse.", '>>{fckingmiracles} : Yes. The head mod of /r/subredditoftheday made it very clear what side he was on when he made KiA the sub of the day back then when they were actively trolling and doxxing game devs still. GG supporters were the trailblazers of the alt-right online.', '>>{SomeoneWithOpinions} : So what will the cowards running Twitter do about this?', ">>{987f} : That's how the internet has always been. Welcome to the real world."], ['>>{LeMot-Juste} : Raise your hands. Who believes little Don Don on this?', ">>{Highfibercarpet} : If the statement was made by any of the Trump family, don't believe it.", '>>{MBAMBA0} : Wow - this adds a lot of weight to my hunch Donald Sr. is on the verge of a complete emotional breakdown if Jr. is distancing himself publicly like this. Either that or there is a power play going on with the older boys and Ivanka/Jared.', '>>{loungeboy79} : Wow, even his family is trying to separate from him, less than 2 months into the presidency. He is THAT corrupt. I wonder if they know more russia info is about to drop.', '>>{PuffPuff74} : I have zero contact with my father. Everything goes through Ivanka.', '>>{anon902503} : I actually do. I always assumed Donald was a horrible father who did not care about his kids except to use them as props.', ">>{jafomatic} : I'm sure her digestive tract doesn't work _that_ fast.", '>>{Apocalypse-Wow} : Since when is Trump associated with being truthful? Blow it out your ass, jr', ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Sure, but Don Don controls the Trump empire now. Seeing as he is traveling to places, at our expense, that suddenly roll in favor of some Trump licensing deal, do you really believe his father isn't having contact with little Don Don to tell him what the next target should be?", ">>{TheMovingFinger} : >I basically have zero contact' with my father …who never tells the truth about anything. So why believe the son?", '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : Ie, trump is still running everything. Liars.', ">>{heymonkeygobananas} : Shouldn't be an issue about contact but of what kind of contact that it was. But since it can never be verified they have to say this. I'm sure Trump c/o are gonna benefit bigly on the precedency and that isn't worthy of the office, as I see it. I don't understand America on this.", '>>{kekus_vult} : He doesnt even need contact for the apperance of impropriety.', '>>{Icouldbeanyone} : Is there a lawsuit against Donald or Jr that is pending because of the claim of "no contact" between the two? I think in North Carolina, or South. I recall reading it somewhere on here. Thought this title was apt to that.', '>>{MBAMBA0} : The stark difference in self-assuredness and seeming comfort-in-their-own skin between Ivanka vs. Donald Jr. & Eric suggests to me that dad was outright abusive to the boys. There are alpha male types who feel very threatened by their sons and so beat them down emotionally, physically or both.'], [">>{dangzal} : Amazon's newest Fire TV stick comes with an Alexa-enabled remote", ">>{I_Love_McRibs} : Now that a new one is out, I'd be happy to buy some of the previous generation for dirt cheap. I have no interest in it being Alexa-enabled.", ">>{battlecows9} : For me, it's all about the new hardware. It's already so small, so the speed could be an issue but the new one has a quad processor, an upgrade from the old fire stick. The new wifi hardware is also useful for folks that have faster wifi.", '>>{evanstueve} : Was always really impressed with the original Fire TV stick. I prefer it over chromecast, Apple TV, and all the others. Instant pre-order for me.', '>>{BlazedAndConfused} : I have the old voice remotes and an echo in the living room. my remotes already work with alexa. this is a bullshit article. shit already works with her...', '>>{BlazedAndConfused} : Uhhh yeah..I did > and now comes bundled with an "Alexa" remote, which lets you use voice search to find stuff to watch. I\'ve been doing this for fucking months. I have 2 remotes, and I can speak to Alexa through them already. She does a ton of shit. What this article means to say is they\'ve upgraded Alexa integration on the latest generation to include additional skills, too. Shitty article.', '>>{hatramroany} : It comes with the Alexa remote now. The former $40 option did not. "Now comes bundled" is what it says. Never says anything about it being newly capable. Shitty reading comprehension.', ">>{Farcrypanda} : Yeah it says so in the article: >The stick costs $40, the same price as the previous model, but now includes the voice remote, which used to cost an additional $10. It's not far down, did you not see it?", ">>{deeluna} : He probably means that he already had a voice remote and that it worked fine with the previous generation stick and that the article didn't mention that the software has been available (and likely installed) on previous generations of the stick.", ">>{komes_grudz} : Can you explain what you like about it? I'm an Apple TV user. Ive tried the fire stick before, but I don't think I spent enough time with it to actually find its appeal.", ">>{evanstueve} : Basically, it feels just as intuitive to use as the Apple TV, but it doesn't rope in with iTunes Store. It's also $30. It plugs directly into the TV so you don't have to hide or mount it."]]

classify and reply

['>>{paraconformity} : A New Rumor Claims Trump Is Considering Roger Ailes As His Campaign Manager', '>>{loremipsumchecksum} : “Hail Trump!”: White nationalists are celebrating Trump’s victory with the Nazi salute', '>>{Cybron} : In an August 13 speech, Hizbullah Secretary-General Nasrallah referred to Donald Trump\'s claim that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama had founded ISIS: "This is no trivial matter; this is a presidential candidate speaking on behalf of the Republican party. He has his own evidence and documents..."', '>>{SpookyKid94} : Death threats only have power because we allow them to.', ">>{Hardy723} : That can't happen. It would just be too much.", ">>{Arctimon} : I don't think the world could take It if this happens. So he's probably going to do it.", '>>{Dsalter123} : Trump does not support this and is no way affiliated with this. They are either idiots or fake pro-trump. Nasty...nasty liberals. Believe anything that they see is bad about trump.', ">>{Everythingberns} : This thread gets down voted instantly lol...It's just news people.", '>>{shoe788} : Was pretty obvious this wasn\'t going to go anywhere, but I think the funny thing was the double standard of "innocent until proven guilty" being afforded to Trump but not Hillary', '>>{ianrl337} : at what point is what Trump is saying Slander?', ">>{paraconformity} : Yeah, can't say I think it's too likely myself. The fact that it's not impossible says something though.", ">>{slaysia} : WH: Kansas shooting 'act of racially motivated hatred", ">>{_kt} : Trump hasn't denounced this or distanced himself from the group either. A person who doesn't support this would do that.", '>>{randomusename} : Now Trump will be free to bring up Clinton\'s ties to Epstein like he started to at CPAC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-Yoj5PFSoY Clinton flew with Epstein over 26 times and all over the world in Epstein\'s jet. When Alan Dershowitz was deposed over Epstein, he had this to say about Bill Clinton- ""And there is the possibility, which I don\'t personally believe to be true, that he was on the island. There was the possibility, which I don\'t believe to be true, that he was on the island when orgies were taking place. There was the possibility that he was on the island and observed an orgy, and there was the possibility that he was on the island and participated in an orgy." A victim of Epstein says she saw Bill Clinton on the private island, and she and Epstein had this to say- \'I remember asking Jeffrey what\'s Bill Clinton doing here kind fo thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me a favor,\' one unidentified woman said in the lawsuit, which was filed in Palm Beach Circuit Court." A convicted pedophile is owed a favor from Bill Clinton. Let that sink in.', '>>{Isstvan82} : the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image.', '>>{0ne_Word} : The machine is hard at work I see. Creating outrage out of thin air by reporting ludicrous rumor as fact.', '>>{chip_0} : The only reason they finally had to squeak out a response is that they were likely pressured by todays visit by the [Indian Foreign Secretary](http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/s-jaishankars-us-visit-h1b-safety-of-indians-likely-to-top-agenda/articleshow/57379963.cms). Sad!', '>>{ianrl337} : Right, so every time he opens his mouth. And how is he not sued?', '>>{wil_daven_} : It took week for them to figure that out?', '>>{rk119} : If that helps you sleep better at night. Muslims support ISIS to a much lower degree than Trump supports alt-right.', ">>{paraconformity} : In this case it's just straight up reporting rumor as rumor, it's right there in the title.", '>>{paraconformity} : To be fair Ailes has more of the pedigree of a traditional presidential campaign manager than either Lewandowski or Manafort did. Ailes was a longtime Republican political hack before he started Fox News.', ">>{randomusename} : Any threats likely came from Clinton. Everytime Epstein comes up, so does Bill Clinton's 26 trips on the Lolita Express. Threats are exactly how Hillary handled past 'bimbo eruptions'", '>>{heartsfelled2} : I was about to bring a suit against Hillary for force masturbating me to provide cum for her satanic rituals but someone on the internet threatened me so I decided my safety was more important. No....really....', '>>{dazed_and_jaded} : Slandering a political figure is a tough sell to a court.', ">>{ChickenBaconPoutine} : Way to nitpick though. When it's not Clinton-positive or good for Trump, only one story can make the front page, but when it's the opposite, you'll have 25 different posts about the very same story. This sub is total cancer.", '>>{themigraine} : Trump is affiliated with this. If you sleep with dogs you get fleas.', ">>{donaldfranklinhornii} : From The Wikipedia-- In 1976, Manafort was the delegate-hunt coordinator for eight states for the President Ford Committee; the overall Ford delegate operation was run by James A. Baker III. Between 1978 and 1980, Manafort was the southern coordinator for Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign, and the deputy political director at the Republican National Committee. After Reagan's election in November 1980, he was appointed Associate Director of the Presidential Personnel Office at the White House. In 1981 he was nominated to the Board of Directors of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Manafort was an adviser to the presidential campaigns of George H.W. Bush in 1988, Robert Dole in 1996, George W. Bush, and John McCain. This bitch (Manafort) knows what the fuck he is doing.", '>>{SaltHash} : Daddy Trump needs to denounce the radical, white terrorism.', '>>{chewinthecud} : How is that rationale any different from American Muslims stating that ISIS is not Islamic? Obama refuses to use the words Islamic Terrorists because it signals ISIS to be Islamic, which they are not. They may claim to be, but they are not. Westboro Baptist Church is a Christian church - should all Christians be lumped together and viewed as Westboro types?? If Trump wants to reach an Obama level of understanding and respect, he needs to come out and say, "Those people do not represent me. I am not a white nationalist. I do not want that stain on my presidency. I will be a President for all Americans." ...and he needs to say it every god damn day. Anything less than a complete amputation will allow the disease to spread, affecting the rest of the body which will probably lead to death....but that\'s none of my business. *I\'m off to work.....*', '>>{rguin} : > or fake pro-trump. lol say Soros did it.', ">>{conanthecnidarian} : Should we shut down the intake of all white males into our country until we can find out what's going on and who is on our side?", ">>{translunar_injection} : > which I don't believe to be true You're conveniently overlooking this bit.", '>>{GonzoNation} : >He has his own evidence and documents..." He has his [own private Iduho](http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Own%20private%20Idaho.).', ">>{GuruOfGravitas} : That is a fit, the CEO of the television news show that made promoting racism hate and fear mongering their national cause and the candidate who's campaign is built on the hate that Roger Ailes built.", ">>{dkliberator} : Oh, the stories they will tell of the women they've accosted.", ">>{Luis_42} : I don't know if the women is telling the truth or not, but what I was pretty sure that this case wouldn't significantly implicate Trump. From what little I read about this rape case it didn't seem like a case that would go far. That is why the lawsuit wasn't widely reported and why I ignored most of the articles that did report on this rape case.", ">>{paraconformity} : Manafort certainly had more business managing a presidential campaign than Lewandowski ever did, but the guy didn't spend two decades in exile wonking for hire to tinpot dictators because he was a rousing success in Republican political circles.", '>>{gothefuckoutside} : Bullshit. It must be hard coming to grips that you are defending the rise of pure evil.', '>>{dfaraci} : And the president suing a citizen for slander would set a terrible precedent.', '>>{TheRealDL} : About that "evidence" and those "documents"... good luck.', '>>{ianrl337} : I get that, but he is said many things that are by definition slander. I hate how litigious our world has become, but there has to be a point where you say \'Did you just say I started ISIS?" He didn\'t say policies, he say President Obama and Clinton started ISIS, he said flat out they did. Others tried to get him to back down, and he doubled down. Politically maybe it isn\'t the right move, but the completely lack of consequences for what he is saying is astounding.', ">>{NeoMoonlight} : It's like kicking the shit out of a retarded kid that was beating up on someone. Yeah... you want to help the person, but in the end you would just be beating up a retarded kid, so you want the other person to do it. Or whatever.", ">>{paraconformity} : I don't even remember the last slow news day.", '>>{ianrl337} : it would also tie up Trump for the next few months.', ">>{ianrl337} : No, you get the handicapped kids guardian to get him out of the fight. But I don't see Ivanka stepping in.", '>>{PhyterNL} : Trump is the best thing to happen to anti-American propagandists for decades.', '>>{GavinGT} : LOL at Trump having evidence for the things he claims.', '>>{thumbprick} : that appears to be the case. Also I hear one was guarding someone else.', ">>{Parcus42} : The alt-right is not racist, it does not exclude anyone for any reason other than incompetence. Every culture has its fringe idiots, these guys are not new. Western society has been stalled for the last 50 years, since 'Nam. The society that settled the new world, put men on the moon and made the internet. Other societies have caught up, especially China, global poverty is all but eliminated. It's time for the West to wake up again and push forward! There's so much to do, like explore space, fusion power, build a better life for everyone. Religion has no place in government. Islamic society is still based on world domination by force, making peace by killing anyone who thinks differently. How's that working out? The alt-right is about freedom, of thought, religion and speech. You're welcome to get involved.", '>>{trekologer} : Trump\'s probably saying to himself, "That brown dude shot himself to make me look bad."', ">>{Hardy723} : Yeah, I am in no way saying Ailes isn't capable. Trump already has an uphill battle on his hands with women; bringing on someone being fired for sexual misconduct is going to, in no way, help that cause. It would only reinforce the support of those already voting for him, but would completely backfire with undecideds. The fodder it'd provide for comedians, though, would be endless.", '>>{FlyingRock} : Or it just panders to the majority of reddit users..', ">>{tenyor} : >alt-right is about freedom, of thought, religion and speech I've never seen any place so censored as r/the_donger", '>>{22locococo} : I stopped reading after "the alt-right is not racist." Pls come back with a better opening sentence.', '>>{NeoMoonlight} : Is nothing sacred!?!?!?!', ">>{PresidentChaos} : It seems that, Hizbullah Secretary-General Nasrallah, doesn't fully realize that Donald Trump is a ridiculous clown, who talks out of his ass.", '>>{irumeru} : And Hillary Clinton was endorsed by the Communist Party USA. Bringing out fringe supporters is a time-honored way to discredit someone. These people have no influence.', ">>{eohorp} : Why can't they just say the words? He is afraid to say the words.", ">>{DragonPup} : He's afraid of a lot of things. Like stairs.", '>>{ChickenBaconPoutine} : No, make no mistake, this sub here has been taken over by pro-Hillary folks.', ">>{Thedummies} : Wow you're the reason I started this account. Dummy", ">>{sdbest} : Isn't that just peachy. Now Trump's lies are being used by Hezbollah for propaganda. Thanks, Donald, for making the United States just a little less secure and safe /s", ">>{pinacolado16} : She's not the fucking president. Get over it.", ">>{FlyingRock} : Because they're pandering to the majority of redditors which are liberal.. Not denying they took over, just saying why they did.", ">>{HomoRapien} : > It's just news people. That's what people said when the story picked up steam in response to criticisms of it having no real substance to it. Now that it's dropped /r/politics will pretend like this never happened.", ">>{jingooftherex} : Doesn't matter. He makes an A+ propaganda tool.", ">>{irumeru} : I don't know if I will ever get over it. It's a well of boundless eternal joy I can always return to if I feel down. Hillary Clinton is not the fucking President. See? Made me happier right there. Thanks.", '>>{eohorp} : Or truth about size. Hands, crowds, EC votes...', '>>{Wiscony} : I think he stores this evidence in the same place he keeps the letter from the NFL complaining about the debate schedule, the video of thousands of Muslims dancing in the streets in NJ after 9/11, and his tax returns.', ">>{thedrscaptain} : I don't blame her. There are some truly fanatical and scary Trump supporters.", '>>{Samwise_the_Tall} : This puts a pit in my stomach that scares the living hell out of me. It saddens as much as it sickens, and our "president" has reawakened these feelings in a group that is utterly terrifying. I know that love and compassion are the only way to conquer hate, but I fear that the hateful have too many emboldened individuals to be stopped. Only time will tell where our country will truly go, but as of right now I hang my head and hope we can make it out of these dark days.', ">>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : /r/politics is a cesspool of liberal indoctrination. Don't get me wrong I'm a staunch Democrat, but this sub is a stain.", ">>{PurpleMentat} : Arab is, and the murderer thought they were Arab. It seems terroristic to me, but I don't think there is evidence to prove terrorism beyond a reasonable doubt.", '>>{Parcus42} : Yeah well depends on your definition of racism I guess. People trying to make their country better is racist then 👍. White supremacists do exist on the far alt-right fringe, and they have been disavowed and denounced by Mr President Elect. Most of us just want to get to work.', '>>{Parcus42} : They are such a random fringe group, and [he has denounced white supremacists](http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/03/politics/donald-trump-disavows-david-duke-kkk/) even CNN said so', '>>{veniceinperil} : He picked Bannon as his Chief Strategist. Bannon is alt/right. He is a Neo-Nazi who says things like,"I haven\'t been this excited about politics since the 1930\'s," and,"multi-ethnic society is a lie." Trump picked a Neo-Nazi for his highest cabinet post.', ">>{Quexana} : Look, let's try to look at this dispassionately and logically for a moment. 1. The White Nationalist movement has been emboldened by the Trump win and is looking to expand their movement and turn their movement mainstream. 2. There is nothing minorities can do to check their growing power. 3. The left has little to no influence to check their growing power. 4. The right has no interest in doing anything substantive to check their growing power. We need new solutions and I'm empty.", '>>{rk119} : >global poverty is all but eliminated. Go backpacking and see the world.', '>>{bundle-of-stix} : I think it\'s extremely telling that your candidate\'s actions can\'t be discussed without you going "BUT WHAT ABOUT".', '>>{forest_ranger} : Arab is not a race and he told the bartender he shot Iranians which is also not a race. Terrorism is the use of violence based on a political agenda to cause fear. HE used violence based on the speaking of the US president to inspire fear and force Iranians to leave the US. I bet if an Iranian murdered an American in Iran you would be wanting to drop nukes on Iran.', ">>{bundle-of-stix} : Sorry, people who voted for trump helped this happen. You own a part of this. You don't get to deny that. Suck it up buttercup.", '>>{PurpleMentat} : First off, no, dropping nukes on anywhere for any reason is a terrible idea. Secondly, "Arab" is an ethnic group, same as Anglicans, Nords, Hispanic, Latino, African-American, Semites, etc. Those are generally what people refer to as "race" when discussing humans. Thirdly, I think there is a strong case for this event to be classed as domestic terrorism. I do not think that case is strong enough to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt to a twelve-member jury of his peers. That\'s the level of proof necessary for it to be the greater charge of domestic terrorism rather than the lesser charge of racially motivated murder. Stop making assumptions about other\'s beliefs based on what you think you read. You\'re attacking a leftist progressive who believes in the rule of law.', '>>{bundle-of-stix} : Stop this. Everyone who voted for a campaign built around racist bullshit owns a part of this. Is America great now?', ">>{squealie} : Again...why should this sub validate an unfit candidate? Nominate somebody that isnt a fucking scumbag...and you might see your 'balance'", '>>{bundle-of-stix} : He and his voters have brought literal nazis to the streets. Shame.', '>>{forest_ranger} : I am not making assumptions, I am pointing out fallacies. Please stop telling people you are a leftist if you are going to keep making false statements.', ">>{Kind_Of_A_Dick} : And didn't Trump have ties to Epstein, even complimenting his taste in women also?", ">>{Everythingberns} : This sub isn't reflective of most people voting Democrat. It's more of a reflection of how far millions of dollars will go on a message board, among other social media websites.", ">>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : >This sub isn't reflective of most people voting Democrat. I never said it was. >It's more of a reflection of how far millions of dollars will go on a message board, among other social media websites. This is exactly what I'm talking about.", ">>{Turk182} : Sources that Hillary had threatened people in the past. I don't have any doubts that Bill is the sort of guy that would want some underage stank on his hanglow", ">>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : Ah, idk how to help you there. I honestly haven't found anything regarding Hillary threatening people.", '>>{shoe788} : And? Bill has, and Hillary has been accused of tons of other crimes. "Lock Her Up"? Hello?', '>>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : You can scream "Lock Her Up" all you want but it doesn\'t mean anything until an authority actually indicts her.', '>>{shoe788} : So Trump is afforded innocence until proven guilty and hillary is afforded the presumption of guilt; ie "lock her up". Yes, double standard, like I said.', '>>{PurpleMentat} : Nothing I said was false. http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article134459444.html >Five hours later, Purinton reportedly told a bartender at a bar in an Applebee’s in Clinton, Mo., that he needed a place to hide out because he had just killed two Middle Eastern men, The Star has learned. Arabs are the ethnic group referred to as "Middle Eastern" in the US. I don\'t expect to convince you. You have already decided I\'m some sort of alt-right boogeyman. Maybe you\'ll Google some of these terms and educate yourself. More likely, someone else with a more open mind will read this. Good luck with all that anger.', '>>{forest_ranger} : >Arabs are the ethnic group So now you admit that Arab is not a race, Thank you I am glad I could help you learn something.', '>>{Discoberry1} : Ahhhhhhh, the deep cover liberal theory comes back to life.', '>>{Turk182} : Well if I find it is it ok to PM you her dark secrets?', '>>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : Honestly he seemed to be subtly pointing out Epstein was a pedophile, rather than "complimenting" him. >He\'s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life. http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/ Trump seems like the kind of guy who can\'t get it up, and needs to brag to feel satisfied.', '>>{Paracortex} : DailyMail conducted a full interview with both her and her primary witness, which is published [here](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3894806/Woman-alleged-raped-Donald-Trump-13-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-DROPS-case-casting-doubt-truth-claims.html). It\'s pretty awful and powerful, and easy to see how vulnerable she is, if you possess even an atom of empathy. It\'s worth reading, so here is most of it, in two parts: > She told DailyMail.com about how she first came to jump on a Greyhound bus from small town Oklahoma to New York in a bid to pursue her dream of becoming a model. She was just 13. > Her nightmare began, she says, when her parents separated when she was just eight and her mother moved them to Washington state. > Her mom then met a new man who was physically and verbally abusive and made her life hell. > Unable to cope Johnson says she decided to move back to Oklahoma to live with her father who had set up home with a new woman. > But life was no easier there either. > The one thing that kept Johnson going was her dream of becoming a fashion model. > She began to save money earned through baby-sitting for relatives so she could make a trip to New York to visit modeling agencies there. > She recalls: \'I got there and went to several modeling agencies but was told that I needed to put together a modeling portfolio before I would be considered, some wouldn\'t even see me. At that point my heart sank, I felt dejected. > \'I then went to the Port Authority [bus and coach terminal] to start to make my way back home. There I met a woman on a bench who introduced herself to me as Tiffany. > \'She was nice and told me about the parties and said that, if I would join her at the parties, I would be introduced to people who could get me into modeling. She said she helped girls like me get to where they want to get. She also said I\'d be paid.\' > Her account was that on that very first night, she met Donald Trump. > Tiffany said there was a party and she took Johnson to meet Epstein at a mansion on 71st Street in Manhattan, that had belonged to retail magnate Leslie H. Wexner of The Limited and was turned over to Epstein. > Johnson recalls that the house was \'filled with expensive things\' and she felt out of place. > It is certainly true that Epstein held parties at the house, and that he is a pedophile. In the course of DailyMail.com\'s investigations, we spoke to \'Tiffany\', who offered a similar account of events, but no actual evidence to back her assertions. > \'Tiffany\' also decline to provide her own true identity. > In Johnson\'s version, she told DailyMail.com how Epstein asked her to strip down to her \'panties\' during an impromptu interview before requesting that she give him a massage. > Fueled by Tiffany\'s assertion that she would have to do certain things to make it as a professional model she agreed, she claimed. > Johnson claimed that even at that first meeting Epstein tried to have sex with her but she refused. > He told her at the end: \'You\'ll do, you\'ve got the job.\' > And that night at the party - which she says was filled with men and young girls - she would meet Donald Trump, she claimed. > Johnson acknowledges that she had no idea who Donald Trump was at the time. > But she claims that she would never forget his face and it was only years later when Trump starred in The Apprentice that she recognized the man she says sexually assaulted her. > That may be the crucial flaw in her story. > She claims the businessman, who in the summer of 1994 was 48, saw her and requested her company through Tiffany. > She said: \'He didn\'t really talk to me at all, he spoke at me, but he was talking to Tiffany more telling her what he wanted me to do. I thought he felt like he was too good to even speak to me. > \'Tiffany told me what I needed to do. Anything he did say to me wasn\'t that great, like "you need some work". I was 13 I didn\'t know what I was doing.\' > Johnson recalls how Tiffany explained how to sexually stimulate Trump. > \'Tiffany explained it like it was second nature - like I should have known what those things meant. This night I was supposed to manually stimulate him and I needed to use a glove for whatever reason,\' she said. > She added: \'And I did not know what she meant at first, I had only kissed a boy at that point, I didn\'t know what to do. She (Tiffany) wanted to give me a crash course, the whole time I\'m not wanting to do it. > \'But she\'s like, "that\'s how models get in to the industry", and if I wanted to be a model bad enough then I would do it.\' > Johnson says the man she claims to be Trump said very little to her during that first encounter other than she reminded him of his daughter. > After Johnson finished the sex act, she claims, he made a comment that she \'wasn\'t great\', before putting on his pants. > \'He left, I don\'t know whether he went to another girl, but that was the last time I saw him that night,\' she said. > Before she left the party Epstein gave her $700. > Tiffany then drove Johnson back to the Port Authority bus terminal and she returned home to Oklahoma in the early hours. During the long journey home she broke down in tears. > \'I cried for a while, I didn\'t know what to do. I was in this dilemma,\' she said. \'I can\'t tell my parents where I went - I didn\'t think they were gonna understand. It would be more than a grounding. > \'I felt that I needed to go back and pretend it never happened.\' > But then just a few days later Epstein\'s recruiter Tiffany called Johnson at home. > Tiffany told her she was mailing her a plane ticket back to New York, there would be money in with it and she also promised to set up a meeting with a director of a modeling agency. > \'She promised to get me into modeling, to get me some gigs and organize my portfolio,\' she said. > \'I felt that at least what happened at the last party wouldn\'t have been a waste and at least I get to do what I came for.\' > Tiffany had told Johnson to keep the encounters secret from her friends and family and made veiled threats that she might get hurt if she lets the secret out because she was dealing with \'powerful people\'. > \'Within a couple of weeks I was heading back to New York. Tiffany had sent me some kind of buddy pass for the flight and money for a cab,\' said Johnson. \'I stayed at Tiffany\'s apartment. I remember she had a driver who would take us places. > \'But when I went back there was a party that night. She (Tiffany) was basically ready when she drove up to the airport to pick me up, my plane had been delayed. I asked her if we could go to her house but basically I changed in the back. > \'When I got to the mansion it was basically the same thing, kind of meet people, entertain people, walk around. If someone requests something of you then... > \'Again Tiffany said I got requested and it was the same guy as before, it was Trump. And I was to give him oral sex. > \'I had never done that to anybody so I was a little nervous, so I walked up to him and moved in that direction and he kind of slapped me away and said, "what are you doing, you need to put a condom on"\'. > Tiffany ran over and handed Johnson a condom and apologized profusely to the man she claims was Trump. [Continued in reply below]', '>>{Paracortex} : [Continued] > \'I felt very intimidated, he made a comment that I wasn\'t doing it right, that I needed to take classes,\' she said. \'He continued to let me do it, he didn\'t tell me to stop. He said something to Tiffany a couple of time, "tell her to go faster". > \'Tiffany was close by, then after a little while, I guess he was done with it and he went. I didn\'t see him again that night.\' > Tears welling in her eyes, Johnson added: \'I knew it was wrong, I didn\'t want to do it, I was scared. I wanted it to be over. > \'I was worried what my dad was gonna think, I didn\'t want him to ever find out, I felt pretty horrible.\' > She was again enticed back to New York for a third time that summer with the promise of a photo shoot and a hook up with a modeling agency. > She claims: \'It was within a few days of the second visit Tiffany called me and said, "You\'ve been requested for a fantasy role play". You could tell she was being pushed at her end.\' > Johnson was told she wouldn\'t have to participate in another party because it was a private set up with another girl. > \'I agreed, I got the ticket and I did the whole thing of "going to grandma\'s" and got a cab. > \'I got to New York and was taken to Jeffrey Epstein\'s house. I was taken to a room and it was me and another girl were cleaning and we would have an encounter and he [Trump] would come in.\' > She described a sordid role play in which her and another underage girl were dressed as maids and she claims they were forced to \'make out\' with each other. > She alleges Trump - or the man she claims was Trump - entered the room and feigned surprise at seeing the two girls. > Johnson said: \'Maria was around the same age as me, it was pretty obvious. I felt she was going through the same thing as me, in that she was being forced to be there somehow. > \'So we cleaned and then very clumsily kissed and Trump caught us making out on the job as part of the role play.\' > She claims \'Trump\' ordered the two girls to carry out a string of sex acts on each other and on him. > \'Again he finished and said we both could have done it better and then left. We never saw him again that night.\' > She added: \'At that point, after these three encounters, the type of man he was, I thought that he was a creepy guy, a molester who wanted sex with these girls. He\'s older than my dad, I felt like he was evil, I was scared of him.\' > Again she went home to Oklahoma in tears but there was to be one final trip to New York. > \'Tiffany would call me and check on me. Then she was like, "Hey I have something", but she was like, "this is the time though, if you can do this we will set you up. You\'ll be getting a contract tonight". > \'She didn\'t say what agency but she said I would be signed by an agency that night if I decided to go. > \'I was like, "well what\'s the worst that could happen", I thought the worst had already been happening.\' > \'She [Tiffany] told me it was a role play but she didn\'t tell me what kind until I got there,\' she recalls. \'And so I\'m freaking out, I\'m like, so you want to tie me to a bed and play out a rape scene with a man. > \'It was just going to be that and that\'s what he [Trump] wanted.\' > Johnson made sure Tiffany stayed in the room and says \'Trump\' agreed reluctantly to allow her. > \'He was pretty rough with me, I was already tied to the bed. I didn\'t really know it was gonna be that, he pushed me around and tore off my clothes,\' she alleges. > She says she thought she would have to stimulate the real estate mogul orally or manually as had happened before. > \'It was like he was going for one thing, it was basically to have intercourse and I started crying and I asked him to stop and I asked Tiffany to come over, but he kept on,\' she claims. > Johnson, who says she was a virgin, said Tiffany tried to intervene, but she was pushed away. > She says: \'It was basically like he was doing it, he was like, "what did you think this was gonna be?" He was very abrasive and I just started crying and I screamed and said "please don\'t", and he slapped me and told me to shut up and then he ripped my panties off. > \'He had sex with me without me wanting to. He was disgusted by the fact I was crying. > \'He got up and started putting on my clothes and basically he was disgusted by the fact I was crying.\' > Johnson says she recalls saying to Tiffany in ear shot of the man she claims was Trump that she could get pregnant because he didn\'t use a condom. > But she said: \'Trump basically said that I should be proud that he would even allow me the opportunity and if I got pregnant I could get an abortion.\' > With that, she says, \'Trump\' threw $400 on to the floor in her direction. > \'Tiffany made clear she wasn\'t happy with him and then Jeffrey Epstein came in and he saw that there was money on the floor and got mad, he asked if I had asked for the money and said that he was gonna be the one to pay me and said it wasn\'t mine to take.\' > Johnson said that Epstein also tried to have sex with her but she says she managed to \'fight him off\' and he got really angry and made a series of threats to her. > According to the lawsuit Epstein also raped her on that occasion. > The woman identified only as Tiffany Doe in the lawsuit, a \'trusted employee\' of Epstein\'s,\' corroborated Johnson\'s\' allegations in a telephone call with DailyMail.com, but she refused to reveal her full identity. In my mind, not a single element of her entire terrible, gut-wrenching testimony sounds fishy, made-up, or even a little off. This monster permanently ruined her life, and now he\'s doing it again. I hope she does better than survive. She deserves peace.', '>>{hammer1717} : Or, yah know, just take a trip to Alabama...', '>>{PurpleMentat} : What is a "race" if it is not an ethnic group? Please, enlighten me. Oh wait, "ethnic group" and "race" are synonyms! >Since the second half of the 20th century, the association of race with the ideologies and theories that grew out of the work of\xa019th-century anthropologists\xa0and physiologists has led to the use of the word\xa0race\xa0itself becoming problematic. Although still used in general contexts,\xa0race\xa0has often been replaced by less ambiguous and\xa0emotionally charged\xa0synonyms:\xa0populations,\xa0people(s),\xa0ethnic groups, or\xa0communities, depending on context. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)', '>>{forest_ranger} : There is one race, human. There are several ethnicities.', '>>{santagoo} : The regressive left / SJW has spoiled progressive movement of late. You best take care of your spoiled apples lest it spoiled yours, too (one can say these neo Nazis already do).', '>>{deltalitprof} : And what are those "sources that Hillary had threatened people in the past"?', ">>{randomusename} : ABC news lead political correspondent and member of Bill Clinton's Whitehouse George Stephanopoulos “She had to do what she had always done before: swallow her doubts, stand by her man and savage his enemies,” Stephanopoulos wrote, describing Hillary Clinton’s reaction. note: George Stephanopoulos has been to Epstein's even after his arrest and release http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/04/01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks.html On the evening of December 2nd, 2010, a handful of America's media and entertainment elite—including TV anchors Katie Couric and ABC NEWS Chief Political Correspondent and member of Bill Clinton's Whitehouse George Stephanopoulos, comedienne Chelsea Handler, and director Woody Allen—convened around the dinner table of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.", ">>{Sour_Badger} : Wow. Reads like a corny novel. This doesn't reek is absolute BS to you?", ">>{ChickenBaconPoutine} : So in your mind, saying mean things that hurt your feelings is worse than taking in massive bribes in exchange of favors? Or worse than starting a civil war in a country to replace its leader because he won't let a pipeline go through?", ">>{coffeespeaking} : This isn't really new. Trump was having his followers take a loyalty pledge at his rallies that reminded many of the [Nazi salute.](http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Donald-Trump_Hitler_Nazi-Salute.jpg) The arm angle seems intentional, and his followers all responded in kind. He wanted them to think this way.", '>>{WeldorDie} : I think its also absurd that no one can just rationally debate it after the fact, instead all you do is point out your idea of wrong doings, real constructive guy.', '>>{WeldorDie} : What do trumps "white nationalists" have to do with Nazis? I don\'t see them attempting to persecute Jews? Doesn\'t change the fact that you are just not addidng anything productive to the conversation.', ">>{ChickenBaconPoutine} : [Oh, I see, you're one of those people.](https://themarshallreport.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/sand-bury-your-head-in-the-sand.jpg)", '>>{squealie} : Not falling for your bs. Youre most lilely russian anyway. American Trump supporters are still sleeping off the Coors-Light', '>>{bundle-of-stix} : We\'re literally in a thread about "white nationalists" throwing up the nazi salute with a good ole hail trump sieg heil thrown in. They\'re Nazis and the post above was weird Hillary deflection. Move on.', '>>{SirBlah} : Are you going to start talking about Mit Romney, John McCain, John Kerry, Al Gore and Bob Dole next?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{paraconformity} : A New Rumor Claims Trump Is Considering Roger Ailes As His Campaign Manager', ">>{Hardy723} : That can't happen. It would just be too much.", ">>{Arctimon} : I don't think the world could take It if this happens. So he's probably going to do it.", ">>{paraconformity} : Yeah, can't say I think it's too likely myself. The fact that it's not impossible says something though.", '>>{0ne_Word} : The machine is hard at work I see. Creating outrage out of thin air by reporting ludicrous rumor as fact.', ">>{paraconformity} : In this case it's just straight up reporting rumor as rumor, it's right there in the title.", '>>{paraconformity} : To be fair Ailes has more of the pedigree of a traditional presidential campaign manager than either Lewandowski or Manafort did. Ailes was a longtime Republican political hack before he started Fox News.', ">>{donaldfranklinhornii} : From The Wikipedia-- In 1976, Manafort was the delegate-hunt coordinator for eight states for the President Ford Committee; the overall Ford delegate operation was run by James A. Baker III. Between 1978 and 1980, Manafort was the southern coordinator for Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign, and the deputy political director at the Republican National Committee. After Reagan's election in November 1980, he was appointed Associate Director of the Presidential Personnel Office at the White House. In 1981 he was nominated to the Board of Directors of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Manafort was an adviser to the presidential campaigns of George H.W. Bush in 1988, Robert Dole in 1996, George W. Bush, and John McCain. This bitch (Manafort) knows what the fuck he is doing.", ">>{GuruOfGravitas} : That is a fit, the CEO of the television news show that made promoting racism hate and fear mongering their national cause and the candidate who's campaign is built on the hate that Roger Ailes built.", ">>{dkliberator} : Oh, the stories they will tell of the women they've accosted.", ">>{paraconformity} : Manafort certainly had more business managing a presidential campaign than Lewandowski ever did, but the guy didn't spend two decades in exile wonking for hire to tinpot dictators because he was a rousing success in Republican political circles.", ">>{paraconformity} : I don't even remember the last slow news day.", ">>{Hardy723} : Yeah, I am in no way saying Ailes isn't capable. Trump already has an uphill battle on his hands with women; bringing on someone being fired for sexual misconduct is going to, in no way, help that cause. It would only reinforce the support of those already voting for him, but would completely backfire with undecideds. The fodder it'd provide for comedians, though, would be endless."], ['>>{Cybron} : In an August 13 speech, Hizbullah Secretary-General Nasrallah referred to Donald Trump\'s claim that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama had founded ISIS: "This is no trivial matter; this is a presidential candidate speaking on behalf of the Republican party. He has his own evidence and documents..."', '>>{ianrl337} : at what point is what Trump is saying Slander?', '>>{Isstvan82} : the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image.', '>>{ianrl337} : Right, so every time he opens his mouth. And how is he not sued?', '>>{dazed_and_jaded} : Slandering a political figure is a tough sell to a court.', '>>{GonzoNation} : >He has his own evidence and documents..." He has his [own private Iduho](http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Own%20private%20Idaho.).', '>>{dfaraci} : And the president suing a citizen for slander would set a terrible precedent.', '>>{TheRealDL} : About that "evidence" and those "documents"... good luck.', '>>{ianrl337} : I get that, but he is said many things that are by definition slander. I hate how litigious our world has become, but there has to be a point where you say \'Did you just say I started ISIS?" He didn\'t say policies, he say President Obama and Clinton started ISIS, he said flat out they did. Others tried to get him to back down, and he doubled down. Politically maybe it isn\'t the right move, but the completely lack of consequences for what he is saying is astounding.', ">>{NeoMoonlight} : It's like kicking the shit out of a retarded kid that was beating up on someone. Yeah... you want to help the person, but in the end you would just be beating up a retarded kid, so you want the other person to do it. Or whatever.", '>>{ianrl337} : it would also tie up Trump for the next few months.', ">>{ianrl337} : No, you get the handicapped kids guardian to get him out of the fight. But I don't see Ivanka stepping in.", '>>{PhyterNL} : Trump is the best thing to happen to anti-American propagandists for decades.', '>>{GavinGT} : LOL at Trump having evidence for the things he claims.', '>>{thumbprick} : that appears to be the case. Also I hear one was guarding someone else.', '>>{NeoMoonlight} : Is nothing sacred!?!?!?!', ">>{PresidentChaos} : It seems that, Hizbullah Secretary-General Nasrallah, doesn't fully realize that Donald Trump is a ridiculous clown, who talks out of his ass.", ">>{sdbest} : Isn't that just peachy. Now Trump's lies are being used by Hezbollah for propaganda. Thanks, Donald, for making the United States just a little less secure and safe /s", ">>{jingooftherex} : Doesn't matter. He makes an A+ propaganda tool.", '>>{Wiscony} : I think he stores this evidence in the same place he keeps the letter from the NFL complaining about the debate schedule, the video of thousands of Muslims dancing in the streets in NJ after 9/11, and his tax returns.'], ['>>{loremipsumchecksum} : “Hail Trump!”: White nationalists are celebrating Trump’s victory with the Nazi salute', '>>{Dsalter123} : Trump does not support this and is no way affiliated with this. They are either idiots or fake pro-trump. Nasty...nasty liberals. Believe anything that they see is bad about trump.', ">>{_kt} : Trump hasn't denounced this or distanced himself from the group either. A person who doesn't support this would do that.", '>>{rk119} : If that helps you sleep better at night. Muslims support ISIS to a much lower degree than Trump supports alt-right.', '>>{themigraine} : Trump is affiliated with this. If you sleep with dogs you get fleas.', '>>{chewinthecud} : How is that rationale any different from American Muslims stating that ISIS is not Islamic? Obama refuses to use the words Islamic Terrorists because it signals ISIS to be Islamic, which they are not. They may claim to be, but they are not. Westboro Baptist Church is a Christian church - should all Christians be lumped together and viewed as Westboro types?? If Trump wants to reach an Obama level of understanding and respect, he needs to come out and say, "Those people do not represent me. I am not a white nationalist. I do not want that stain on my presidency. I will be a President for all Americans." ...and he needs to say it every god damn day. Anything less than a complete amputation will allow the disease to spread, affecting the rest of the body which will probably lead to death....but that\'s none of my business. *I\'m off to work.....*', '>>{rguin} : > or fake pro-trump. lol say Soros did it.', '>>{gothefuckoutside} : Bullshit. It must be hard coming to grips that you are defending the rise of pure evil.', ">>{Parcus42} : The alt-right is not racist, it does not exclude anyone for any reason other than incompetence. Every culture has its fringe idiots, these guys are not new. Western society has been stalled for the last 50 years, since 'Nam. The society that settled the new world, put men on the moon and made the internet. Other societies have caught up, especially China, global poverty is all but eliminated. It's time for the West to wake up again and push forward! There's so much to do, like explore space, fusion power, build a better life for everyone. Religion has no place in government. Islamic society is still based on world domination by force, making peace by killing anyone who thinks differently. How's that working out? The alt-right is about freedom, of thought, religion and speech. You're welcome to get involved.", ">>{tenyor} : >alt-right is about freedom, of thought, religion and speech I've never seen any place so censored as r/the_donger", '>>{22locococo} : I stopped reading after "the alt-right is not racist." Pls come back with a better opening sentence.', '>>{irumeru} : And Hillary Clinton was endorsed by the Communist Party USA. Bringing out fringe supporters is a time-honored way to discredit someone. These people have no influence.', ">>{Thedummies} : Wow you're the reason I started this account. Dummy", ">>{pinacolado16} : She's not the fucking president. Get over it.", ">>{irumeru} : I don't know if I will ever get over it. It's a well of boundless eternal joy I can always return to if I feel down. Hillary Clinton is not the fucking President. See? Made me happier right there. Thanks.", '>>{Samwise_the_Tall} : This puts a pit in my stomach that scares the living hell out of me. It saddens as much as it sickens, and our "president" has reawakened these feelings in a group that is utterly terrifying. I know that love and compassion are the only way to conquer hate, but I fear that the hateful have too many emboldened individuals to be stopped. Only time will tell where our country will truly go, but as of right now I hang my head and hope we can make it out of these dark days.', '>>{Parcus42} : Yeah well depends on your definition of racism I guess. People trying to make their country better is racist then 👍. White supremacists do exist on the far alt-right fringe, and they have been disavowed and denounced by Mr President Elect. Most of us just want to get to work.', '>>{Parcus42} : They are such a random fringe group, and [he has denounced white supremacists](http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/03/politics/donald-trump-disavows-david-duke-kkk/) even CNN said so', '>>{veniceinperil} : He picked Bannon as his Chief Strategist. Bannon is alt/right. He is a Neo-Nazi who says things like,"I haven\'t been this excited about politics since the 1930\'s," and,"multi-ethnic society is a lie." Trump picked a Neo-Nazi for his highest cabinet post.', ">>{Quexana} : Look, let's try to look at this dispassionately and logically for a moment. 1. The White Nationalist movement has been emboldened by the Trump win and is looking to expand their movement and turn their movement mainstream. 2. There is nothing minorities can do to check their growing power. 3. The left has little to no influence to check their growing power. 4. The right has no interest in doing anything substantive to check their growing power. We need new solutions and I'm empty.", '>>{rk119} : >global poverty is all but eliminated. Go backpacking and see the world.', '>>{bundle-of-stix} : I think it\'s extremely telling that your candidate\'s actions can\'t be discussed without you going "BUT WHAT ABOUT".', ">>{bundle-of-stix} : Sorry, people who voted for trump helped this happen. You own a part of this. You don't get to deny that. Suck it up buttercup.", '>>{bundle-of-stix} : Stop this. Everyone who voted for a campaign built around racist bullshit owns a part of this. Is America great now?', '>>{bundle-of-stix} : He and his voters have brought literal nazis to the streets. Shame.', '>>{Discoberry1} : Ahhhhhhh, the deep cover liberal theory comes back to life.', '>>{hammer1717} : Or, yah know, just take a trip to Alabama...', '>>{santagoo} : The regressive left / SJW has spoiled progressive movement of late. You best take care of your spoiled apples lest it spoiled yours, too (one can say these neo Nazis already do).', ">>{coffeespeaking} : This isn't really new. Trump was having his followers take a loyalty pledge at his rallies that reminded many of the [Nazi salute.](http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Donald-Trump_Hitler_Nazi-Salute.jpg) The arm angle seems intentional, and his followers all responded in kind. He wanted them to think this way.", '>>{WeldorDie} : I think its also absurd that no one can just rationally debate it after the fact, instead all you do is point out your idea of wrong doings, real constructive guy.', '>>{WeldorDie} : What do trumps "white nationalists" have to do with Nazis? I don\'t see them attempting to persecute Jews? Doesn\'t change the fact that you are just not addidng anything productive to the conversation.', '>>{bundle-of-stix} : We\'re literally in a thread about "white nationalists" throwing up the nazi salute with a good ole hail trump sieg heil thrown in. They\'re Nazis and the post above was weird Hillary deflection. Move on.', '>>{SirBlah} : Are you going to start talking about Mit Romney, John McCain, John Kerry, Al Gore and Bob Dole next?'], [">>{slaysia} : WH: Kansas shooting 'act of racially motivated hatred", '>>{chip_0} : The only reason they finally had to squeak out a response is that they were likely pressured by todays visit by the [Indian Foreign Secretary](http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/s-jaishankars-us-visit-h1b-safety-of-indians-likely-to-top-agenda/articleshow/57379963.cms). Sad!', '>>{wil_daven_} : It took week for them to figure that out?', '>>{SaltHash} : Daddy Trump needs to denounce the radical, white terrorism.', ">>{conanthecnidarian} : Should we shut down the intake of all white males into our country until we can find out what's going on and who is on our side?", '>>{trekologer} : Trump\'s probably saying to himself, "That brown dude shot himself to make me look bad."', ">>{eohorp} : Why can't they just say the words? He is afraid to say the words.", ">>{DragonPup} : He's afraid of a lot of things. Like stairs.", '>>{eohorp} : Or truth about size. Hands, crowds, EC votes...', ">>{PurpleMentat} : Arab is, and the murderer thought they were Arab. It seems terroristic to me, but I don't think there is evidence to prove terrorism beyond a reasonable doubt.", '>>{forest_ranger} : Arab is not a race and he told the bartender he shot Iranians which is also not a race. Terrorism is the use of violence based on a political agenda to cause fear. HE used violence based on the speaking of the US president to inspire fear and force Iranians to leave the US. I bet if an Iranian murdered an American in Iran you would be wanting to drop nukes on Iran.', '>>{PurpleMentat} : First off, no, dropping nukes on anywhere for any reason is a terrible idea. Secondly, "Arab" is an ethnic group, same as Anglicans, Nords, Hispanic, Latino, African-American, Semites, etc. Those are generally what people refer to as "race" when discussing humans. Thirdly, I think there is a strong case for this event to be classed as domestic terrorism. I do not think that case is strong enough to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt to a twelve-member jury of his peers. That\'s the level of proof necessary for it to be the greater charge of domestic terrorism rather than the lesser charge of racially motivated murder. Stop making assumptions about other\'s beliefs based on what you think you read. You\'re attacking a leftist progressive who believes in the rule of law.', '>>{forest_ranger} : I am not making assumptions, I am pointing out fallacies. Please stop telling people you are a leftist if you are going to keep making false statements.', '>>{PurpleMentat} : Nothing I said was false. http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article134459444.html >Five hours later, Purinton reportedly told a bartender at a bar in an Applebee’s in Clinton, Mo., that he needed a place to hide out because he had just killed two Middle Eastern men, The Star has learned. Arabs are the ethnic group referred to as "Middle Eastern" in the US. I don\'t expect to convince you. You have already decided I\'m some sort of alt-right boogeyman. Maybe you\'ll Google some of these terms and educate yourself. More likely, someone else with a more open mind will read this. Good luck with all that anger.', '>>{forest_ranger} : >Arabs are the ethnic group So now you admit that Arab is not a race, Thank you I am glad I could help you learn something.', '>>{PurpleMentat} : What is a "race" if it is not an ethnic group? Please, enlighten me. Oh wait, "ethnic group" and "race" are synonyms! >Since the second half of the 20th century, the association of race with the ideologies and theories that grew out of the work of\xa019th-century anthropologists\xa0and physiologists has led to the use of the word\xa0race\xa0itself becoming problematic. Although still used in general contexts,\xa0race\xa0has often been replaced by less ambiguous and\xa0emotionally charged\xa0synonyms:\xa0populations,\xa0people(s),\xa0ethnic groups, or\xa0communities, depending on context. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)', '>>{forest_ranger} : There is one race, human. There are several ethnicities.'], ['>>{SpookyKid94} : Death threats only have power because we allow them to.', ">>{Everythingberns} : This thread gets down voted instantly lol...It's just news people.", '>>{shoe788} : Was pretty obvious this wasn\'t going to go anywhere, but I think the funny thing was the double standard of "innocent until proven guilty" being afforded to Trump but not Hillary', '>>{randomusename} : Now Trump will be free to bring up Clinton\'s ties to Epstein like he started to at CPAC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-Yoj5PFSoY Clinton flew with Epstein over 26 times and all over the world in Epstein\'s jet. When Alan Dershowitz was deposed over Epstein, he had this to say about Bill Clinton- ""And there is the possibility, which I don\'t personally believe to be true, that he was on the island. There was the possibility, which I don\'t believe to be true, that he was on the island when orgies were taking place. There was the possibility that he was on the island and observed an orgy, and there was the possibility that he was on the island and participated in an orgy." A victim of Epstein says she saw Bill Clinton on the private island, and she and Epstein had this to say- \'I remember asking Jeffrey what\'s Bill Clinton doing here kind fo thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me a favor,\' one unidentified woman said in the lawsuit, which was filed in Palm Beach Circuit Court." A convicted pedophile is owed a favor from Bill Clinton. Let that sink in.', ">>{randomusename} : Any threats likely came from Clinton. Everytime Epstein comes up, so does Bill Clinton's 26 trips on the Lolita Express. Threats are exactly how Hillary handled past 'bimbo eruptions'", '>>{heartsfelled2} : I was about to bring a suit against Hillary for force masturbating me to provide cum for her satanic rituals but someone on the internet threatened me so I decided my safety was more important. No....really....', ">>{ChickenBaconPoutine} : Way to nitpick though. When it's not Clinton-positive or good for Trump, only one story can make the front page, but when it's the opposite, you'll have 25 different posts about the very same story. This sub is total cancer.", ">>{translunar_injection} : > which I don't believe to be true You're conveniently overlooking this bit.", ">>{Luis_42} : I don't know if the women is telling the truth or not, but what I was pretty sure that this case wouldn't significantly implicate Trump. From what little I read about this rape case it didn't seem like a case that would go far. That is why the lawsuit wasn't widely reported and why I ignored most of the articles that did report on this rape case.", '>>{FlyingRock} : Or it just panders to the majority of reddit users..', '>>{ChickenBaconPoutine} : No, make no mistake, this sub here has been taken over by pro-Hillary folks.', ">>{FlyingRock} : Because they're pandering to the majority of redditors which are liberal.. Not denying they took over, just saying why they did.", ">>{HomoRapien} : > It's just news people. That's what people said when the story picked up steam in response to criticisms of it having no real substance to it. Now that it's dropped /r/politics will pretend like this never happened.", ">>{thedrscaptain} : I don't blame her. There are some truly fanatical and scary Trump supporters.", ">>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : /r/politics is a cesspool of liberal indoctrination. Don't get me wrong I'm a staunch Democrat, but this sub is a stain.", ">>{squealie} : Again...why should this sub validate an unfit candidate? Nominate somebody that isnt a fucking scumbag...and you might see your 'balance'", ">>{Kind_Of_A_Dick} : And didn't Trump have ties to Epstein, even complimenting his taste in women also?", ">>{Everythingberns} : This sub isn't reflective of most people voting Democrat. It's more of a reflection of how far millions of dollars will go on a message board, among other social media websites.", ">>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : >This sub isn't reflective of most people voting Democrat. I never said it was. >It's more of a reflection of how far millions of dollars will go on a message board, among other social media websites. This is exactly what I'm talking about.", ">>{Turk182} : Sources that Hillary had threatened people in the past. I don't have any doubts that Bill is the sort of guy that would want some underage stank on his hanglow", ">>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : Ah, idk how to help you there. I honestly haven't found anything regarding Hillary threatening people.", '>>{shoe788} : And? Bill has, and Hillary has been accused of tons of other crimes. "Lock Her Up"? Hello?', '>>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : You can scream "Lock Her Up" all you want but it doesn\'t mean anything until an authority actually indicts her.', '>>{shoe788} : So Trump is afforded innocence until proven guilty and hillary is afforded the presumption of guilt; ie "lock her up". Yes, double standard, like I said.', '>>{Turk182} : Well if I find it is it ok to PM you her dark secrets?', '>>{PM_UR_DARK_SECRETS} : Honestly he seemed to be subtly pointing out Epstein was a pedophile, rather than "complimenting" him. >He\'s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life. http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/ Trump seems like the kind of guy who can\'t get it up, and needs to brag to feel satisfied.', '>>{Paracortex} : DailyMail conducted a full interview with both her and her primary witness, which is published [here](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3894806/Woman-alleged-raped-Donald-Trump-13-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-DROPS-case-casting-doubt-truth-claims.html). It\'s pretty awful and powerful, and easy to see how vulnerable she is, if you possess even an atom of empathy. It\'s worth reading, so here is most of it, in two parts: > She told DailyMail.com about how she first came to jump on a Greyhound bus from small town Oklahoma to New York in a bid to pursue her dream of becoming a model. She was just 13. > Her nightmare began, she says, when her parents separated when she was just eight and her mother moved them to Washington state. > Her mom then met a new man who was physically and verbally abusive and made her life hell. > Unable to cope Johnson says she decided to move back to Oklahoma to live with her father who had set up home with a new woman. > But life was no easier there either. > The one thing that kept Johnson going was her dream of becoming a fashion model. > She began to save money earned through baby-sitting for relatives so she could make a trip to New York to visit modeling agencies there. > She recalls: \'I got there and went to several modeling agencies but was told that I needed to put together a modeling portfolio before I would be considered, some wouldn\'t even see me. At that point my heart sank, I felt dejected. > \'I then went to the Port Authority [bus and coach terminal] to start to make my way back home. There I met a woman on a bench who introduced herself to me as Tiffany. > \'She was nice and told me about the parties and said that, if I would join her at the parties, I would be introduced to people who could get me into modeling. She said she helped girls like me get to where they want to get. She also said I\'d be paid.\' > Her account was that on that very first night, she met Donald Trump. > Tiffany said there was a party and she took Johnson to meet Epstein at a mansion on 71st Street in Manhattan, that had belonged to retail magnate Leslie H. Wexner of The Limited and was turned over to Epstein. > Johnson recalls that the house was \'filled with expensive things\' and she felt out of place. > It is certainly true that Epstein held parties at the house, and that he is a pedophile. In the course of DailyMail.com\'s investigations, we spoke to \'Tiffany\', who offered a similar account of events, but no actual evidence to back her assertions. > \'Tiffany\' also decline to provide her own true identity. > In Johnson\'s version, she told DailyMail.com how Epstein asked her to strip down to her \'panties\' during an impromptu interview before requesting that she give him a massage. > Fueled by Tiffany\'s assertion that she would have to do certain things to make it as a professional model she agreed, she claimed. > Johnson claimed that even at that first meeting Epstein tried to have sex with her but she refused. > He told her at the end: \'You\'ll do, you\'ve got the job.\' > And that night at the party - which she says was filled with men and young girls - she would meet Donald Trump, she claimed. > Johnson acknowledges that she had no idea who Donald Trump was at the time. > But she claims that she would never forget his face and it was only years later when Trump starred in The Apprentice that she recognized the man she says sexually assaulted her. > That may be the crucial flaw in her story. > She claims the businessman, who in the summer of 1994 was 48, saw her and requested her company through Tiffany. > She said: \'He didn\'t really talk to me at all, he spoke at me, but he was talking to Tiffany more telling her what he wanted me to do. I thought he felt like he was too good to even speak to me. > \'Tiffany told me what I needed to do. Anything he did say to me wasn\'t that great, like "you need some work". I was 13 I didn\'t know what I was doing.\' > Johnson recalls how Tiffany explained how to sexually stimulate Trump. > \'Tiffany explained it like it was second nature - like I should have known what those things meant. This night I was supposed to manually stimulate him and I needed to use a glove for whatever reason,\' she said. > She added: \'And I did not know what she meant at first, I had only kissed a boy at that point, I didn\'t know what to do. She (Tiffany) wanted to give me a crash course, the whole time I\'m not wanting to do it. > \'But she\'s like, "that\'s how models get in to the industry", and if I wanted to be a model bad enough then I would do it.\' > Johnson says the man she claims to be Trump said very little to her during that first encounter other than she reminded him of his daughter. > After Johnson finished the sex act, she claims, he made a comment that she \'wasn\'t great\', before putting on his pants. > \'He left, I don\'t know whether he went to another girl, but that was the last time I saw him that night,\' she said. > Before she left the party Epstein gave her $700. > Tiffany then drove Johnson back to the Port Authority bus terminal and she returned home to Oklahoma in the early hours. During the long journey home she broke down in tears. > \'I cried for a while, I didn\'t know what to do. I was in this dilemma,\' she said. \'I can\'t tell my parents where I went - I didn\'t think they were gonna understand. It would be more than a grounding. > \'I felt that I needed to go back and pretend it never happened.\' > But then just a few days later Epstein\'s recruiter Tiffany called Johnson at home. > Tiffany told her she was mailing her a plane ticket back to New York, there would be money in with it and she also promised to set up a meeting with a director of a modeling agency. > \'She promised to get me into modeling, to get me some gigs and organize my portfolio,\' she said. > \'I felt that at least what happened at the last party wouldn\'t have been a waste and at least I get to do what I came for.\' > Tiffany had told Johnson to keep the encounters secret from her friends and family and made veiled threats that she might get hurt if she lets the secret out because she was dealing with \'powerful people\'. > \'Within a couple of weeks I was heading back to New York. Tiffany had sent me some kind of buddy pass for the flight and money for a cab,\' said Johnson. \'I stayed at Tiffany\'s apartment. I remember she had a driver who would take us places. > \'But when I went back there was a party that night. She (Tiffany) was basically ready when she drove up to the airport to pick me up, my plane had been delayed. I asked her if we could go to her house but basically I changed in the back. > \'When I got to the mansion it was basically the same thing, kind of meet people, entertain people, walk around. If someone requests something of you then... > \'Again Tiffany said I got requested and it was the same guy as before, it was Trump. And I was to give him oral sex. > \'I had never done that to anybody so I was a little nervous, so I walked up to him and moved in that direction and he kind of slapped me away and said, "what are you doing, you need to put a condom on"\'. > Tiffany ran over and handed Johnson a condom and apologized profusely to the man she claims was Trump. [Continued in reply below]', '>>{Paracortex} : [Continued] > \'I felt very intimidated, he made a comment that I wasn\'t doing it right, that I needed to take classes,\' she said. \'He continued to let me do it, he didn\'t tell me to stop. He said something to Tiffany a couple of time, "tell her to go faster". > \'Tiffany was close by, then after a little while, I guess he was done with it and he went. I didn\'t see him again that night.\' > Tears welling in her eyes, Johnson added: \'I knew it was wrong, I didn\'t want to do it, I was scared. I wanted it to be over. > \'I was worried what my dad was gonna think, I didn\'t want him to ever find out, I felt pretty horrible.\' > She was again enticed back to New York for a third time that summer with the promise of a photo shoot and a hook up with a modeling agency. > She claims: \'It was within a few days of the second visit Tiffany called me and said, "You\'ve been requested for a fantasy role play". You could tell she was being pushed at her end.\' > Johnson was told she wouldn\'t have to participate in another party because it was a private set up with another girl. > \'I agreed, I got the ticket and I did the whole thing of "going to grandma\'s" and got a cab. > \'I got to New York and was taken to Jeffrey Epstein\'s house. I was taken to a room and it was me and another girl were cleaning and we would have an encounter and he [Trump] would come in.\' > She described a sordid role play in which her and another underage girl were dressed as maids and she claims they were forced to \'make out\' with each other. > She alleges Trump - or the man she claims was Trump - entered the room and feigned surprise at seeing the two girls. > Johnson said: \'Maria was around the same age as me, it was pretty obvious. I felt she was going through the same thing as me, in that she was being forced to be there somehow. > \'So we cleaned and then very clumsily kissed and Trump caught us making out on the job as part of the role play.\' > She claims \'Trump\' ordered the two girls to carry out a string of sex acts on each other and on him. > \'Again he finished and said we both could have done it better and then left. We never saw him again that night.\' > She added: \'At that point, after these three encounters, the type of man he was, I thought that he was a creepy guy, a molester who wanted sex with these girls. He\'s older than my dad, I felt like he was evil, I was scared of him.\' > Again she went home to Oklahoma in tears but there was to be one final trip to New York. > \'Tiffany would call me and check on me. Then she was like, "Hey I have something", but she was like, "this is the time though, if you can do this we will set you up. You\'ll be getting a contract tonight". > \'She didn\'t say what agency but she said I would be signed by an agency that night if I decided to go. > \'I was like, "well what\'s the worst that could happen", I thought the worst had already been happening.\' > \'She [Tiffany] told me it was a role play but she didn\'t tell me what kind until I got there,\' she recalls. \'And so I\'m freaking out, I\'m like, so you want to tie me to a bed and play out a rape scene with a man. > \'It was just going to be that and that\'s what he [Trump] wanted.\' > Johnson made sure Tiffany stayed in the room and says \'Trump\' agreed reluctantly to allow her. > \'He was pretty rough with me, I was already tied to the bed. I didn\'t really know it was gonna be that, he pushed me around and tore off my clothes,\' she alleges. > She says she thought she would have to stimulate the real estate mogul orally or manually as had happened before. > \'It was like he was going for one thing, it was basically to have intercourse and I started crying and I asked him to stop and I asked Tiffany to come over, but he kept on,\' she claims. > Johnson, who says she was a virgin, said Tiffany tried to intervene, but she was pushed away. > She says: \'It was basically like he was doing it, he was like, "what did you think this was gonna be?" He was very abrasive and I just started crying and I screamed and said "please don\'t", and he slapped me and told me to shut up and then he ripped my panties off. > \'He had sex with me without me wanting to. He was disgusted by the fact I was crying. > \'He got up and started putting on my clothes and basically he was disgusted by the fact I was crying.\' > Johnson says she recalls saying to Tiffany in ear shot of the man she claims was Trump that she could get pregnant because he didn\'t use a condom. > But she said: \'Trump basically said that I should be proud that he would even allow me the opportunity and if I got pregnant I could get an abortion.\' > With that, she says, \'Trump\' threw $400 on to the floor in her direction. > \'Tiffany made clear she wasn\'t happy with him and then Jeffrey Epstein came in and he saw that there was money on the floor and got mad, he asked if I had asked for the money and said that he was gonna be the one to pay me and said it wasn\'t mine to take.\' > Johnson said that Epstein also tried to have sex with her but she says she managed to \'fight him off\' and he got really angry and made a series of threats to her. > According to the lawsuit Epstein also raped her on that occasion. > The woman identified only as Tiffany Doe in the lawsuit, a \'trusted employee\' of Epstein\'s,\' corroborated Johnson\'s\' allegations in a telephone call with DailyMail.com, but she refused to reveal her full identity. In my mind, not a single element of her entire terrible, gut-wrenching testimony sounds fishy, made-up, or even a little off. This monster permanently ruined her life, and now he\'s doing it again. I hope she does better than survive. She deserves peace.', '>>{deltalitprof} : And what are those "sources that Hillary had threatened people in the past"?', ">>{randomusename} : ABC news lead political correspondent and member of Bill Clinton's Whitehouse George Stephanopoulos “She had to do what she had always done before: swallow her doubts, stand by her man and savage his enemies,” Stephanopoulos wrote, describing Hillary Clinton’s reaction. note: George Stephanopoulos has been to Epstein's even after his arrest and release http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/04/01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-society-friends-close-ranks.html On the evening of December 2nd, 2010, a handful of America's media and entertainment elite—including TV anchors Katie Couric and ABC NEWS Chief Political Correspondent and member of Bill Clinton's Whitehouse George Stephanopoulos, comedienne Chelsea Handler, and director Woody Allen—convened around the dinner table of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.", ">>{Sour_Badger} : Wow. Reads like a corny novel. This doesn't reek is absolute BS to you?", ">>{ChickenBaconPoutine} : So in your mind, saying mean things that hurt your feelings is worse than taking in massive bribes in exchange of favors? Or worse than starting a civil war in a country to replace its leader because he won't let a pipeline go through?", ">>{ChickenBaconPoutine} : [Oh, I see, you're one of those people.](https://themarshallreport.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/sand-bury-your-head-in-the-sand.jpg)", '>>{squealie} : Not falling for your bs. Youre most lilely russian anyway. American Trump supporters are still sleeping off the Coors-Light']]

classify and reply

['>>{declanrg} : twitter actually does this as well, which is kinda neat', ">>{yuhche} : What's the use of a QR scanner in Twitter?", '>>{Redpeg1} : I deleted the QR scanner app soon as I found Twitter had this 😂😂', '>>{rancid2000} : You can follow someone by scanning his QR code I guess', ">>{rancid2000} : Yeah QR apps are a plague, it's nice to have some kind of integrated alternative", ">>{yuhche} : Scan their QR code where? On their phone? On my desktop/laptop screen? Easier to search for their username and hit 'follow'.", '>>{PikachuSquarepants} : Donald Trump falsely tells GOP Philly homicides are ‘terribly increasing’', '>>{ajaxsinger} : Well, they are "terribly increasing." I figure if they were "well increasing" they\'d be going up. THey\'re going down instead so they\'re increasing absolutely abysmally. Trump is never wrong, he\'s just advanced-right.', '>>{rancid2000} : Yeah I totally agree but it seems that they decided to offer it still :)', ">>{crisss1205} : It's if you are in person. Just like Snapcodes. If you are right next to the person it is easier to pull up the QR code instead of searching for them.", ">>{kingme1571} : Doesn't work for me? Tried it on lock screen, swipe down menu, and the one when you scroll all the way left on home page", '>>{yuhche} : This requires both users to have their phones out, searching requires one. And having just looked at its in an unintuitive place, just like lists. The search bar is at the top, build it in there like the Amazon and eBay app have instead of Me, settings gear then QR code.', '>>{Vipe777} : What version of iOS and Chrome are you on? Worked for me on the app itself', '>>{dacheeze} : Looks like it was [added](https://www.macrumors.com/2017/02/02/google-chrome-ios-update-qr-code/) as an update on the 2nd but for whatever reason I do not see it yet', '>>{Bmmaximus} : I didn;t see the update until I plugged my phone into my PC. itunes had the update on there', '>>{dacheeze} : I got it to work by opening Chrome. After closing it the option then appeared. Apparently the update caused me to be logged out of my google account and it was waiting for action from me.', '>>{crisss1205} : Are we not talking about 3D touch? Many people already have their phones out. At least for Snapchat, I never search for the other person, I always use their Snapcode.', ">>{freediverx01} : I think the value of QR codes (from a user's perspective) has been greatly exaggerated by marketers.", ">>{DC25NYC} : Doesn't he know that people in cities arent as dumb and gullible as the rural voters?", '>>{blacksoxing} : Thanks to this thread, I realized force touching existed on my Nexus 6p. Sadly, force touching Chrome just allows me to open a new tab or incognito tab.....', '>>{MrJoobJoob} : Whataya know, he\'s lying again. Won\'t stop the frothing masses from believing it. People hear Philadelphia and think it\'s some crime ridden shithole but it couldn\'t be further from the truth. But because of Trump it\'ll probably get lumped in with other amazing cities like Chicago as "warzones" filled with "carnage."', '>>{VGtheory} : So....is Trump just going to "send in the feds" for every major city that went blue?', ">>{UglyPineapple} : > Trump is never wrong, he's just ~~advanced-right.~~ Trump is never wrong, he's just alternative-right.", ">>{geeeeoffff} : Why doesn't force touch work on links in Google Chrome? I am too used to it in safari", ">>{yuhche} : We are but Twitter hasn't implemented QR code following from the 3D Touch menu, it has search which is where the QR code should be. And 3D Touch is limited two generations of iPhones, on earlier generations of iPhones and other OSs it would work like how I detailed.", ">>{CrtureBlckMacaroons} : I didn't see it at first. I had to actually open chrome, then go back to the home screen, then force touch on chrome, and then it worked.", '>>{westondeboer} : 500 / 1 paint the white house gold! I will take those odds.', '>>{muhfuhkuh} : 1) Suspend sales of firearms for "sanctuary" and "high-crime" cities. 2) Send in National Guard to enforce "curfews" 3) Declare "state of emergency" and proceed with gun confiscation on a house to house basis in the same manner as the feds and authorities in Louisiana during Hurricane Katrina 4) [Trump\'s the New Sheriff in town](http://i.imgur.com/HD3BLq7.jpg) Resist this shit now, or we\'re all lost.', ">>{CrtureBlckMacaroons} : This is a relatively new feature, came out like a week ago. I like to read the release notes on my updates, even when they're updated automatically.", '>>{dc6k} : Twitter has a QR scanner in the 3D touch menu', ">>{crisss1205} : >Twitter hasn't implemented QR code following from the 3D Touch menu Yes they have. 3D touch the app icon and click on QR code. The other user does the same thing.", ">>{yuhche} : I stand corrected. I don't use the official Twitter app. Which version of the app did they introduce this? Link to news article.", ">>{bigw86} : I've literally never used one except once to try it. I'm not sure of anyone who actually uses these but in sure there's a few otherwise surely they wouldn't keep making them?", '>>{VGtheory} : Yeah....#1 will be damn near impossible. The NRA and gun nuts see that as writing on the walls.', '>>{fishbiscuit13} : It takes a little while, you have to open it at least once or twice after you update.', ">>{michael2527} : Same website. Check the weekly reports there. Drastic increase in 2017 so far. Doesn't fit with the agenda to bash Trump, though.", ">>{toaster99} : Tell that to China. Most Chinese probably use QR codes on a nearly daily basis. The most popular social app (WeChat) uses them for adding people, reading articles, and much more. You can even pay at stores and send money to friends with QR codes in China. Every website you visit has a QR code in the footer or at the end of an article. My Chinese phone's camera app natively recognizes QR codes when taking a picture since they are so heavily used.", '>>{SeditiousConspiracy} : Good work. Mr. Trump will be contacting you soon about your new position.', ">>{michael2527} : They're up 54% in 2017 so far, compared to the same period in 2016. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B23Pg6Sgxll1b3FOTGphM3c3OTQ Guess that doesn't fit the narrative, though.", '>>{DocFunkinstein} : QR be printed out, like scan this code to get weather closing in your area', '>>{Magjee} : You want to link to the Philly police or something? No one wants to check out someones google drive as a reliable source', '>>{michael2527} : Indeed, the official Google drive of the Philadelphia police department containing their official crime statistics, directly accessed via the website on which politifact bases their article. Trump never said over which time period. See how you can cherry pick statistics to either prove or disprove someone? I see it happening all the time.', ">>{SmilingYellowSofa} : As someone who likes to travel, they're at a ton of tourist attractions I'm surprised apple doesn't include on by default. Average consumer uses this more than Compass I'd wager", '>>{pmrr} : If you can a URL it will open it in the built-in browser too, which saves installing a separate QR scanner.', ">>{horseypie} : 100%. I hated QR codes till I moved to china. They're super useful! I wish the rest of the world would catch up", ">>{Ihaveanotheridentity} : The iPhone needs to add a QR scanner to the native camera app. I've never understood why it wasn't included.", '>>{rminor205} : Thanks. Doing this worked for me. iP 6s, for those interested.', '>>{rminor205} : Where do you see the QR scanner on Twitter?', ">>{eTom22} : That's fantastic, thank you! I can finally uninstall qr scanning apps!", ">>{shea241} : Oh wow, look at the change from December to January, 1800% increase in homicides! We're all completely doomed! Or ... this is why you don't use such tiny segments of time as legitimate comparisons. Those documents are comparing only the first few days of 2016 and 2017. By the time it had recorded 22 days, the homicide increase dropped to 20%. The only thing that report says is: the first 22 days of January were more murdery this year than last year. The homicide rates for the previous 5 years (starting with 2016): 277, 280, 248, 246, 331, 326. So, year-to-year variations of +-20% are normal in the previous data, even though it has been decreasing quickly. And, the past 5 years for early January murder-rates-so-far has varied by up to 60%, but sometimes as little as 0%. It's an extremely noisy value that is completely useless for predicting the year's trends. For example, from 2013 to 2014, the first 24 days of January saw a 41% increase in homicides. Yet, by the end of 2014, the actual increase was 0.8% That's not a narrative. If you want to talk about crime trends, you talk about actual trends, not the wildly varying rates from week to week.", '>>{heathergraytshirt} : Why do you need a news article? Lol.', '>>{Vipe777} : I switched from android to aos. Google doesnt give a fuck about the android apps lol', '>>{superfluousAM} : Any way how non-force touch devices can access the scanner?', ">>{prplelemonade} : Their teams are just so fragmented there's almost no collaboration between them. Edit: wording", '>>{flounder19} : > Mayor Jim Kenney released a statement Thursday afternoon saying the president’s comments were "insulting" to police. > "Our police officers have worked tirelessly and with great personal sacrifice to get Philadelphia’s crime rate down to its lowest point in forty years, while also successfully implementing reforms to strengthen police-community relations and uphold the rights of all our residents," he said in the statement. > He continued: "Our homicides are, in fact, [slowly declining](http://i.imgur.com/C22nULY.png), and while we are not satisfied with even our current numbers, we are handicapped by Republican refusal to enact any kind of common sense gun control and by their obsession with turning our police officers into ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] agents — which will prevent immigrants from coming forward to report crimes or provide critical witnesses statements that can put dangerous criminals behind bars."', '>>{ghrayfahx} : I was just told this today. I guess AliPay uses QR codes from what the guy said.', '>>{michael2527} : So I link to the Google drive of the Philly police. Directly accessed from this website, then go down to weekly reports. https://www.phillypolice.com/crime-maps-stats/', ">>{italianfatman} : I think I'm going to go into the 'scream room' business. Kindred souls who can't believe this is our president can come in for a small fee and literally scream. Somehow I think it's a really Yuge idea. And then give the money to efforts to impeach him.", ">>{ghrayfahx} : I figured Apple realized so few people actually use QR codes on anything resembling a regular basis. I've used them maybe 4 or 5 times ever (excluding the latest Pokémon game) and I've been using smart phones since 2009. And most people I've met have used them even less often than that.", ">>{arahman81} : I use a QR code to link to my wifi. For some reason iOS don't seem to recognize it.", '>>{OfficialDribo} : Just go through the update history on App Store lol?', '>>{WraithSama} : Did he actually say that? "*Terribly increasing*?" This guy is a fucking moron! We elected an imbecile!', ">>{michael2527} : Now you tell me that it isn't terribly increasing then ;) Knowing Trump, he probably read in a Philly paper that homicides were on the rise recently. Still, 280 and 277 is up from 248 and 246, if you want to take a longer period of time. And his message in the speech is plainly that there are too much homicides. The funny thing with some media is that, if year on year homicides would have indeed increased and the first weeks of 2017 would have indicated a decline, they would report on that. I've seen this happen months on end. There is indeed a narrative of negativity. This can of course be expected, Trump steps on a lot of toes, particularly those of the media, and furthermore is a radical change from the status quo in every single way. The thing is this: then do not proclaim to be objective media, as any unverifiable/unsourced story that discredits Trump is widely reported by news outlets.", ">>{shea241} : All 'sides' latch on to appealing numbers based on bad stats, incomplete sources, and so on. It's very bad no matter who does it. If we went by the homicide deltas from month to month, it would look like nothing is having any effect, that it's completely random. So, it's *crucial* to look at trends over multiple years (5+), where the noise disappears and the actual direction is obvious. That way, you're able to give a certain probability that the next year will follow the trend, and define an envelope which it will likely fall within.", ">>{rminor205} : It's there now. For some reason it wasn't earlier.", '>>{Albert_Caboose} : trump never said over which time period Your OP, which describes trump\'s claims, says that he was referring to "so far in 2017." Which would be a portion of time, which would make that a time period. He did say which time period, you made that very claim.', '>>{stun} : I wonder what he is going to say when there is another mass shooting like the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, CT. I am not wishing for one, but we all know there will be another mass shooting sooner or later.', ">>{500547} : Over Obama's second term they're significantly up. Why is that?", '>>{yuhche} : Yeah because App Store release notes are always really helpful lol?', ">>{SprSynJn} : There are many things that Chrome doesn't do that Safari can. Odd I've anyways thought.", ">>{ZippoS} : They were EVERYWHERE in Japan when I visited back in 2008. Think about it — everyone's got a web-enabled flip phone. But typing in a URL on those is a pain in the ass, especially since URLs are not written in Japanese. Luckily, every phone has a camera and built-in QR code scanning software. You could click on any poster you found along your walk and get info. Their phones were years ahead of anything back in North America before the iPhone came around. The shitty rental phone I had even had a built-in TV tuner. Japan also has a lot more foot traffic than most of North America. Everything's so densely packed, so more people are walking and getting the train than driving. Also, Japan has a lot of little interactive public events (like stamp rallies — where you explore an area to find a number of booths with a stamp. If you collect all the stamps, you can get a price.). Those make great use of QR codes. The problem here is that no smartphone I've seen has ever had QR scanning *built-in* as native software. It's always been a third-party app. As such, there's always an additional step in the way. **If Apple had built QR scanning into the camera app from the beginning, QR codes could have caught on a *lot* more.**", ">>{anoninator} : I rarely ever use them, usually it's quicker to just go to google and search for whatever it is I need to know. Occasionally it comes up as a novelty or some other odd reason to try it. In the past I used to have an app for iOS to scan them but got rid of it because I almost never use it, it was also kind of slow. This tip will be a nice workaround for me.", ">>{dragontology} : Force touching really doesn't exist on Android, though Samsung is rumored to bring it with the Galaxy S8. What you're experiencing is a long touch feature added to the stock launcher, as well as Nova Prime. I mean, force touching requires a pressure sensitive screen, and AFAIK no Android phone has done it yet. But Google (and Nova) are working on a workaround for those which don't. Originally it was going to be swipe down on the icon.", '>>{Bondjoy} : For non force-touch devices, you can type QR in spotlight to access the Chrome QR camera.', '>>{Ihaveanotheridentity} : If it was always available in the camera app maybe more people would use them. In Japan, QR codes are a huge deal. The USA, not so much.', ">>{freediverx01} : > Most Chinese probably use QR codes on a nearly daily basis. I don't consider the Chinese to be the best arbiters of good product or service design.", ">>{freediverx01} : Tip: Don't use the Twitter app. Use Tweetbot instead.", ">>{freediverx01} : > They were EVERYWHERE in Japan when I visited back in 2008. Think about it — everyone's got a web-enabled flip phone. So that's TWO things the Japanese are doing wrong.", ">>{freediverx01} : In South Korea virtually everyone uses Windows and IE6, and many websites still depend on ActiveX. Does that mean they're good?", '>>{PeanutbutterandJAMM} : I love the sub I just learn more and more', '>>{Funkbass} : This is a dumb question, but there have been "pressure" features in apps long before the iPhone 6s. A great example is the garage band app, where you can lightly tap a drum or beat the shit out of it. What\'s the difference between this type of pressure sensitivity in a screen and sensitivity that would enable a force touch feature?', ">>{SprSynJn} : Did I say they were? Might be good to not put words in people's mouths when you want to try and prove a point.", ">>{dragontology} : Well yes, the Nintendo DS is a great example of pressure sensitive touch display as it operates both the original iPhone and the first Android device. So don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Apple innovated the feature. I tested the force touch feature on my wife's Droid Turbo 2, and while the context menu came up as expected, it didn't include a new tab option, but her Chrome may be out of date. She doesn't ever check for updates; IIRC the Google Play store would check for then and download automatically, on Wi-Fi, eventually.", ">>{ZippoS} : This was nearly 10 years ago, before the iPhone 3G had even been announced, so the iPhone still very new and very limited in release. The iPhone didn't catch on in Japan for the first few years because it was missing a lot of features that Japanese phones had. Their flip phones were light years ahead of what we had back home. Also, because of how their alphabet works, it can actually be easier to type on a T9 keypad than a standard keyboard. The iPhone is very popular in Japan nowadays.", ">>{freediverx01} : > This was nearly 10 years ago Then the claim that QR codes were EVERYWHERE is likewise outdated. > The iPhone didn't catch on in Japan for the first few years because it was missing a lot of features that Japanese phones had. Right... must-have features like a tv tuner. lol. The iPhone seems to be quite popular there now, yet it still lacks the TV tuner and other esoteric Japanese features. > Their flip phones were light years ahead of what we had back home. The US cell phone industry, especially the nascent wannabe smartphone market, was absolute rubbish before the first iPhone, because the market was dominated by greedy and useless wireless carriers and shitty companies like Microsoft. This is the reason why I never bought a pre-iPhone smartphone despite being a lifelong early adopter of new tech. japan lagged in embracing the iPhone for a variety of reasons, but lack of native QR code support certainly wasn't one of them.", ">>{ZippoS} : > Right... must-have features like a tv tuner. lol. The iPhone seems to be quite popular there now, yet it still lacks the TV tuner and other esoteric Japanese features. They don't need TV tuners anymore because streaming has taken over. At the time, however, having a TV tuner was commonplace. The phone also lacked emoji (which were already a big thing there), native support for Japan's [EEW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_Early_Warning_\\(Japan\\)), and, yes, native support for QR scanning. A lot of little things made the first iPhones less appealing for the Japanese public. Emoji and native support for EEW were later added, QR scanning can be handled through third-party apps, and streaming apps take care of video. The iPhone caught up, so it became popular. > Then the claim that QR codes were EVERYWHERE is likewise outdated. As far as I know, they're still pretty common, as they're already well-known and still useful. I'm heading back to Japan later this spring, so I'll let ya know for sure ;)", ">>{ZippoS} : Can I ask exactly why you hate QR Codes so much? I mean, not liking them very much, sure... but you seem to have some sort of personal vendetta against them. They allow a person to scan in what could otherwise be a very long URL, saving them time. You don't have to use them if you don't want, but they do have their usefulness.", ">>{freediverx01} : I don't hate QR codes per se. What I hate are crass marketing techniques posing as consumer-friendly services and promoted by people as must-have essential features.", '>>{freediverx01} : > The iPhone caught up, so it became popular. More like the Japanese caught up. IMO the first iPhone was absolutely revolutionary, despite its many initial faults and limitations.', '>>{toaster99} : Well then your a very racist and stupid person. Some of the most exciting technology is coming of China', ">>{freediverx01} : You sound like a Chinese version of Trump. Every example of Chinese innovation I've seen has been a shameless copy of an American product. China's biggest industry is corporate espionage and intellectual property theft.", '>>{toaster99} : And you sound like every other idiotic American who thinks "American made" garbage is the best in the world.', ">>{sexy_foot_pics} : GarageBand doesn't actually sense pressure it senses how far your phone moves after being pressed! It's cool", '>>{freediverx01} : No, I don\'t think "American made" products are generally the best in the world. But many of the best products in the world originated with American individualism and creativity, which stands in contrast to Asian collectivism and conformity. "Made in China" was synonymous with junk until Apple disproved the maxim by making some of the world\'s best products in Chinese factories.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{declanrg} : twitter actually does this as well, which is kinda neat', ">>{yuhche} : What's the use of a QR scanner in Twitter?", '>>{Redpeg1} : I deleted the QR scanner app soon as I found Twitter had this 😂😂', '>>{rancid2000} : You can follow someone by scanning his QR code I guess', ">>{rancid2000} : Yeah QR apps are a plague, it's nice to have some kind of integrated alternative", ">>{yuhche} : Scan their QR code where? On their phone? On my desktop/laptop screen? Easier to search for their username and hit 'follow'.", '>>{rancid2000} : Yeah I totally agree but it seems that they decided to offer it still :)', ">>{crisss1205} : It's if you are in person. Just like Snapcodes. If you are right next to the person it is easier to pull up the QR code instead of searching for them.", ">>{kingme1571} : Doesn't work for me? Tried it on lock screen, swipe down menu, and the one when you scroll all the way left on home page", '>>{yuhche} : This requires both users to have their phones out, searching requires one. And having just looked at its in an unintuitive place, just like lists. The search bar is at the top, build it in there like the Amazon and eBay app have instead of Me, settings gear then QR code.', '>>{Vipe777} : What version of iOS and Chrome are you on? Worked for me on the app itself', '>>{dacheeze} : Looks like it was [added](https://www.macrumors.com/2017/02/02/google-chrome-ios-update-qr-code/) as an update on the 2nd but for whatever reason I do not see it yet', '>>{Bmmaximus} : I didn;t see the update until I plugged my phone into my PC. itunes had the update on there', '>>{dacheeze} : I got it to work by opening Chrome. After closing it the option then appeared. Apparently the update caused me to be logged out of my google account and it was waiting for action from me.', '>>{crisss1205} : Are we not talking about 3D touch? Many people already have their phones out. At least for Snapchat, I never search for the other person, I always use their Snapcode.', ">>{freediverx01} : I think the value of QR codes (from a user's perspective) has been greatly exaggerated by marketers.", '>>{blacksoxing} : Thanks to this thread, I realized force touching existed on my Nexus 6p. Sadly, force touching Chrome just allows me to open a new tab or incognito tab.....', ">>{geeeeoffff} : Why doesn't force touch work on links in Google Chrome? I am too used to it in safari", ">>{yuhche} : We are but Twitter hasn't implemented QR code following from the 3D Touch menu, it has search which is where the QR code should be. And 3D Touch is limited two generations of iPhones, on earlier generations of iPhones and other OSs it would work like how I detailed.", ">>{CrtureBlckMacaroons} : I didn't see it at first. I had to actually open chrome, then go back to the home screen, then force touch on chrome, and then it worked.", ">>{CrtureBlckMacaroons} : This is a relatively new feature, came out like a week ago. I like to read the release notes on my updates, even when they're updated automatically.", '>>{dc6k} : Twitter has a QR scanner in the 3D touch menu', ">>{crisss1205} : >Twitter hasn't implemented QR code following from the 3D Touch menu Yes they have. 3D touch the app icon and click on QR code. The other user does the same thing.", ">>{yuhche} : I stand corrected. I don't use the official Twitter app. Which version of the app did they introduce this? Link to news article.", ">>{bigw86} : I've literally never used one except once to try it. I'm not sure of anyone who actually uses these but in sure there's a few otherwise surely they wouldn't keep making them?", '>>{fishbiscuit13} : It takes a little while, you have to open it at least once or twice after you update.', ">>{toaster99} : Tell that to China. Most Chinese probably use QR codes on a nearly daily basis. The most popular social app (WeChat) uses them for adding people, reading articles, and much more. You can even pay at stores and send money to friends with QR codes in China. Every website you visit has a QR code in the footer or at the end of an article. My Chinese phone's camera app natively recognizes QR codes when taking a picture since they are so heavily used.", '>>{DocFunkinstein} : QR be printed out, like scan this code to get weather closing in your area', ">>{SmilingYellowSofa} : As someone who likes to travel, they're at a ton of tourist attractions I'm surprised apple doesn't include on by default. Average consumer uses this more than Compass I'd wager", '>>{pmrr} : If you can a URL it will open it in the built-in browser too, which saves installing a separate QR scanner.', ">>{horseypie} : 100%. I hated QR codes till I moved to china. They're super useful! I wish the rest of the world would catch up", ">>{Ihaveanotheridentity} : The iPhone needs to add a QR scanner to the native camera app. I've never understood why it wasn't included.", '>>{rminor205} : Thanks. Doing this worked for me. iP 6s, for those interested.', '>>{rminor205} : Where do you see the QR scanner on Twitter?', ">>{eTom22} : That's fantastic, thank you! I can finally uninstall qr scanning apps!", '>>{heathergraytshirt} : Why do you need a news article? Lol.', '>>{Vipe777} : I switched from android to aos. Google doesnt give a fuck about the android apps lol', '>>{superfluousAM} : Any way how non-force touch devices can access the scanner?', ">>{prplelemonade} : Their teams are just so fragmented there's almost no collaboration between them. Edit: wording", '>>{ghrayfahx} : I was just told this today. I guess AliPay uses QR codes from what the guy said.', ">>{ghrayfahx} : I figured Apple realized so few people actually use QR codes on anything resembling a regular basis. I've used them maybe 4 or 5 times ever (excluding the latest Pokémon game) and I've been using smart phones since 2009. And most people I've met have used them even less often than that.", ">>{arahman81} : I use a QR code to link to my wifi. For some reason iOS don't seem to recognize it.", '>>{OfficialDribo} : Just go through the update history on App Store lol?', ">>{rminor205} : It's there now. For some reason it wasn't earlier.", '>>{yuhche} : Yeah because App Store release notes are always really helpful lol?', ">>{SprSynJn} : There are many things that Chrome doesn't do that Safari can. Odd I've anyways thought.", ">>{ZippoS} : They were EVERYWHERE in Japan when I visited back in 2008. Think about it — everyone's got a web-enabled flip phone. But typing in a URL on those is a pain in the ass, especially since URLs are not written in Japanese. Luckily, every phone has a camera and built-in QR code scanning software. You could click on any poster you found along your walk and get info. Their phones were years ahead of anything back in North America before the iPhone came around. The shitty rental phone I had even had a built-in TV tuner. Japan also has a lot more foot traffic than most of North America. Everything's so densely packed, so more people are walking and getting the train than driving. Also, Japan has a lot of little interactive public events (like stamp rallies — where you explore an area to find a number of booths with a stamp. If you collect all the stamps, you can get a price.). Those make great use of QR codes. The problem here is that no smartphone I've seen has ever had QR scanning *built-in* as native software. It's always been a third-party app. As such, there's always an additional step in the way. **If Apple had built QR scanning into the camera app from the beginning, QR codes could have caught on a *lot* more.**", ">>{anoninator} : I rarely ever use them, usually it's quicker to just go to google and search for whatever it is I need to know. Occasionally it comes up as a novelty or some other odd reason to try it. In the past I used to have an app for iOS to scan them but got rid of it because I almost never use it, it was also kind of slow. This tip will be a nice workaround for me.", ">>{dragontology} : Force touching really doesn't exist on Android, though Samsung is rumored to bring it with the Galaxy S8. What you're experiencing is a long touch feature added to the stock launcher, as well as Nova Prime. I mean, force touching requires a pressure sensitive screen, and AFAIK no Android phone has done it yet. But Google (and Nova) are working on a workaround for those which don't. Originally it was going to be swipe down on the icon.", '>>{Bondjoy} : For non force-touch devices, you can type QR in spotlight to access the Chrome QR camera.', '>>{Ihaveanotheridentity} : If it was always available in the camera app maybe more people would use them. In Japan, QR codes are a huge deal. The USA, not so much.', ">>{freediverx01} : > Most Chinese probably use QR codes on a nearly daily basis. I don't consider the Chinese to be the best arbiters of good product or service design.", ">>{freediverx01} : Tip: Don't use the Twitter app. Use Tweetbot instead.", ">>{freediverx01} : > They were EVERYWHERE in Japan when I visited back in 2008. Think about it — everyone's got a web-enabled flip phone. So that's TWO things the Japanese are doing wrong.", ">>{freediverx01} : In South Korea virtually everyone uses Windows and IE6, and many websites still depend on ActiveX. Does that mean they're good?", '>>{PeanutbutterandJAMM} : I love the sub I just learn more and more', '>>{Funkbass} : This is a dumb question, but there have been "pressure" features in apps long before the iPhone 6s. A great example is the garage band app, where you can lightly tap a drum or beat the shit out of it. What\'s the difference between this type of pressure sensitivity in a screen and sensitivity that would enable a force touch feature?', ">>{SprSynJn} : Did I say they were? Might be good to not put words in people's mouths when you want to try and prove a point.", ">>{dragontology} : Well yes, the Nintendo DS is a great example of pressure sensitive touch display as it operates both the original iPhone and the first Android device. So don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Apple innovated the feature. I tested the force touch feature on my wife's Droid Turbo 2, and while the context menu came up as expected, it didn't include a new tab option, but her Chrome may be out of date. She doesn't ever check for updates; IIRC the Google Play store would check for then and download automatically, on Wi-Fi, eventually.", ">>{ZippoS} : This was nearly 10 years ago, before the iPhone 3G had even been announced, so the iPhone still very new and very limited in release. The iPhone didn't catch on in Japan for the first few years because it was missing a lot of features that Japanese phones had. Their flip phones were light years ahead of what we had back home. Also, because of how their alphabet works, it can actually be easier to type on a T9 keypad than a standard keyboard. The iPhone is very popular in Japan nowadays.", ">>{freediverx01} : > This was nearly 10 years ago Then the claim that QR codes were EVERYWHERE is likewise outdated. > The iPhone didn't catch on in Japan for the first few years because it was missing a lot of features that Japanese phones had. Right... must-have features like a tv tuner. lol. The iPhone seems to be quite popular there now, yet it still lacks the TV tuner and other esoteric Japanese features. > Their flip phones were light years ahead of what we had back home. The US cell phone industry, especially the nascent wannabe smartphone market, was absolute rubbish before the first iPhone, because the market was dominated by greedy and useless wireless carriers and shitty companies like Microsoft. This is the reason why I never bought a pre-iPhone smartphone despite being a lifelong early adopter of new tech. japan lagged in embracing the iPhone for a variety of reasons, but lack of native QR code support certainly wasn't one of them.", ">>{ZippoS} : > Right... must-have features like a tv tuner. lol. The iPhone seems to be quite popular there now, yet it still lacks the TV tuner and other esoteric Japanese features. They don't need TV tuners anymore because streaming has taken over. At the time, however, having a TV tuner was commonplace. The phone also lacked emoji (which were already a big thing there), native support for Japan's [EEW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_Early_Warning_\\(Japan\\)), and, yes, native support for QR scanning. A lot of little things made the first iPhones less appealing for the Japanese public. Emoji and native support for EEW were later added, QR scanning can be handled through third-party apps, and streaming apps take care of video. The iPhone caught up, so it became popular. > Then the claim that QR codes were EVERYWHERE is likewise outdated. As far as I know, they're still pretty common, as they're already well-known and still useful. I'm heading back to Japan later this spring, so I'll let ya know for sure ;)", ">>{ZippoS} : Can I ask exactly why you hate QR Codes so much? I mean, not liking them very much, sure... but you seem to have some sort of personal vendetta against them. They allow a person to scan in what could otherwise be a very long URL, saving them time. You don't have to use them if you don't want, but they do have their usefulness.", ">>{freediverx01} : I don't hate QR codes per se. What I hate are crass marketing techniques posing as consumer-friendly services and promoted by people as must-have essential features.", '>>{freediverx01} : > The iPhone caught up, so it became popular. More like the Japanese caught up. IMO the first iPhone was absolutely revolutionary, despite its many initial faults and limitations.', '>>{toaster99} : Well then your a very racist and stupid person. Some of the most exciting technology is coming of China', ">>{freediverx01} : You sound like a Chinese version of Trump. Every example of Chinese innovation I've seen has been a shameless copy of an American product. China's biggest industry is corporate espionage and intellectual property theft.", '>>{toaster99} : And you sound like every other idiotic American who thinks "American made" garbage is the best in the world.', ">>{sexy_foot_pics} : GarageBand doesn't actually sense pressure it senses how far your phone moves after being pressed! It's cool", '>>{freediverx01} : No, I don\'t think "American made" products are generally the best in the world. But many of the best products in the world originated with American individualism and creativity, which stands in contrast to Asian collectivism and conformity. "Made in China" was synonymous with junk until Apple disproved the maxim by making some of the world\'s best products in Chinese factories.'], ['>>{PikachuSquarepants} : Donald Trump falsely tells GOP Philly homicides are ‘terribly increasing’', '>>{ajaxsinger} : Well, they are "terribly increasing." I figure if they were "well increasing" they\'d be going up. THey\'re going down instead so they\'re increasing absolutely abysmally. Trump is never wrong, he\'s just advanced-right.', ">>{DC25NYC} : Doesn't he know that people in cities arent as dumb and gullible as the rural voters?", '>>{MrJoobJoob} : Whataya know, he\'s lying again. Won\'t stop the frothing masses from believing it. People hear Philadelphia and think it\'s some crime ridden shithole but it couldn\'t be further from the truth. But because of Trump it\'ll probably get lumped in with other amazing cities like Chicago as "warzones" filled with "carnage."', '>>{VGtheory} : So....is Trump just going to "send in the feds" for every major city that went blue?', ">>{UglyPineapple} : > Trump is never wrong, he's just ~~advanced-right.~~ Trump is never wrong, he's just alternative-right.", '>>{westondeboer} : 500 / 1 paint the white house gold! I will take those odds.', '>>{muhfuhkuh} : 1) Suspend sales of firearms for "sanctuary" and "high-crime" cities. 2) Send in National Guard to enforce "curfews" 3) Declare "state of emergency" and proceed with gun confiscation on a house to house basis in the same manner as the feds and authorities in Louisiana during Hurricane Katrina 4) [Trump\'s the New Sheriff in town](http://i.imgur.com/HD3BLq7.jpg) Resist this shit now, or we\'re all lost.', '>>{VGtheory} : Yeah....#1 will be damn near impossible. The NRA and gun nuts see that as writing on the walls.', ">>{michael2527} : Same website. Check the weekly reports there. Drastic increase in 2017 so far. Doesn't fit with the agenda to bash Trump, though.", '>>{SeditiousConspiracy} : Good work. Mr. Trump will be contacting you soon about your new position.', ">>{michael2527} : They're up 54% in 2017 so far, compared to the same period in 2016. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B23Pg6Sgxll1b3FOTGphM3c3OTQ Guess that doesn't fit the narrative, though.", '>>{Magjee} : You want to link to the Philly police or something? No one wants to check out someones google drive as a reliable source', '>>{michael2527} : Indeed, the official Google drive of the Philadelphia police department containing their official crime statistics, directly accessed via the website on which politifact bases their article. Trump never said over which time period. See how you can cherry pick statistics to either prove or disprove someone? I see it happening all the time.', ">>{shea241} : Oh wow, look at the change from December to January, 1800% increase in homicides! We're all completely doomed! Or ... this is why you don't use such tiny segments of time as legitimate comparisons. Those documents are comparing only the first few days of 2016 and 2017. By the time it had recorded 22 days, the homicide increase dropped to 20%. The only thing that report says is: the first 22 days of January were more murdery this year than last year. The homicide rates for the previous 5 years (starting with 2016): 277, 280, 248, 246, 331, 326. So, year-to-year variations of +-20% are normal in the previous data, even though it has been decreasing quickly. And, the past 5 years for early January murder-rates-so-far has varied by up to 60%, but sometimes as little as 0%. It's an extremely noisy value that is completely useless for predicting the year's trends. For example, from 2013 to 2014, the first 24 days of January saw a 41% increase in homicides. Yet, by the end of 2014, the actual increase was 0.8% That's not a narrative. If you want to talk about crime trends, you talk about actual trends, not the wildly varying rates from week to week.", '>>{flounder19} : > Mayor Jim Kenney released a statement Thursday afternoon saying the president’s comments were "insulting" to police. > "Our police officers have worked tirelessly and with great personal sacrifice to get Philadelphia’s crime rate down to its lowest point in forty years, while also successfully implementing reforms to strengthen police-community relations and uphold the rights of all our residents," he said in the statement. > He continued: "Our homicides are, in fact, [slowly declining](http://i.imgur.com/C22nULY.png), and while we are not satisfied with even our current numbers, we are handicapped by Republican refusal to enact any kind of common sense gun control and by their obsession with turning our police officers into ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] agents — which will prevent immigrants from coming forward to report crimes or provide critical witnesses statements that can put dangerous criminals behind bars."', '>>{michael2527} : So I link to the Google drive of the Philly police. Directly accessed from this website, then go down to weekly reports. https://www.phillypolice.com/crime-maps-stats/', ">>{italianfatman} : I think I'm going to go into the 'scream room' business. Kindred souls who can't believe this is our president can come in for a small fee and literally scream. Somehow I think it's a really Yuge idea. And then give the money to efforts to impeach him.", '>>{WraithSama} : Did he actually say that? "*Terribly increasing*?" This guy is a fucking moron! We elected an imbecile!', ">>{michael2527} : Now you tell me that it isn't terribly increasing then ;) Knowing Trump, he probably read in a Philly paper that homicides were on the rise recently. Still, 280 and 277 is up from 248 and 246, if you want to take a longer period of time. And his message in the speech is plainly that there are too much homicides. The funny thing with some media is that, if year on year homicides would have indeed increased and the first weeks of 2017 would have indicated a decline, they would report on that. I've seen this happen months on end. There is indeed a narrative of negativity. This can of course be expected, Trump steps on a lot of toes, particularly those of the media, and furthermore is a radical change from the status quo in every single way. The thing is this: then do not proclaim to be objective media, as any unverifiable/unsourced story that discredits Trump is widely reported by news outlets.", ">>{shea241} : All 'sides' latch on to appealing numbers based on bad stats, incomplete sources, and so on. It's very bad no matter who does it. If we went by the homicide deltas from month to month, it would look like nothing is having any effect, that it's completely random. So, it's *crucial* to look at trends over multiple years (5+), where the noise disappears and the actual direction is obvious. That way, you're able to give a certain probability that the next year will follow the trend, and define an envelope which it will likely fall within.", '>>{Albert_Caboose} : trump never said over which time period Your OP, which describes trump\'s claims, says that he was referring to "so far in 2017." Which would be a portion of time, which would make that a time period. He did say which time period, you made that very claim.', '>>{stun} : I wonder what he is going to say when there is another mass shooting like the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, CT. I am not wishing for one, but we all know there will be another mass shooting sooner or later.', ">>{500547} : Over Obama's second term they're significantly up. Why is that?"]]

classify and reply

[">>{Murderers_Row_Boat} : Ivanka Trump company promotes $10,000 bracelet worn on '60 Minutes'", '>>{_Deplorable} : Trump has made a career out of having people underestimate his savvy, instincts and, yes, intelligence. Elites in both major political parties did this all last year, and now will watch from the sidelines as Trump swears to uphold the Constitution.', '>>{Grnmntman} : Why are we still considering her a viable candidate after the IG report.', '>>{NoIWillNotYield} : She already said she does in a South Carolina town hall....', ">>{PrettyMuchAVegetable} : Dumb dumbs can vote for dumb dumbs. I've seen no evidence Trump is intelligent.", ">>{Grnmntman} : Not at all, it's clear that Sanders is a much much stronger general election candidate. If they want Trump to win they want to face Hillary.", '>>{Murderers_Row_Boat} : Nothing says, "Respecting the Presidency" like using it to sell gaudy, over-priced jewelry to rich people.', '>>{polishedrhythm18} : No it isnt. 99.9999% of their article are dedicated to covering the market and stocks. With a slight sliver of some opinions which may affect the market long term.', '>>{ohheyitsdeejay} : Yes, we all underestimated that scrappy youngster that was given an 8 million dollar loan to start off his career. What an underdog.', ">>{olov244} : she does and mob mentality agrees. this is another issue that is popular but the moral choice needs to be argued. no different than invading iraq, regime changes, tax cuts, etc. just because it's popular doesn't mean it's the right thing to do", ">>{jbgobgob} : The Trumps are hilariously transparent hucksters. This is their version of 'doing good business.' They come off as the lousiest salespeople ever, who would be far more at home at a late 19th-century carnival selling snake oil or on TV infomercials. Yet Trump was elected. It boggles the imagination.", ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Rich people don't buy that crap. Trump brand is for middle plebs who think they are rich", '>>{veridique} : LOL. Their opinion pieces make the WSJ opinion pieces seem progressive.', '>>{Mae315} : So this is our President and first family for the next 4 years...', ">>{Grumpy_Cunt} : At this point it makes more sense to conclude that the system has rewarded Trump's specific type of dumbness rather than that he is not dumb. All the people who point to his financial and now political success as proof that he is not a moron aren't acknowledging the possibility that a certain kind of moron, with enough ego and inherited wealth and sheer dumb luck, can fail upwards, all the way to the white house. That should sound crazy, but it still makes more sense to me than the possibility that Trump is secretly smart. In 30+ years of public speaking he hasn't, even accidentally, managed a single sentence that couldn't have come out of the mouth of a (horrible) child.", '>>{WelcomeToBoshwitz} : She said she does in a South Carolina town hall.', ">>{Murderers_Row_Boat} : Rich people will start buying if they know what's good for them. They won't want a visit from President Trump's Immigration/Trump Family Marketing Force.", ">>{manster62} : It wasn't his intelligence, lets put that to rest. He hooked up with billionaires who had a political agenda. They take control and will weild power through Trump. They want what only an authoritarian, power mad King can give them. Total control of the country from the government. I was watching a Chinese business spokesman yesterday on the difference between American capitalism and the Chinese market economy. He said that business controls the American government so policies cannot change under a two party system. In China, policies can change because of a party system where business doesn't control the government. They work for the interest of the country, not just a few.", '>>{Grumpy_Cunt} : He\'s not smart. He\'s not even "like smart". At best I will concede that he might be alt-smart.', '>>{Themostunderdisturb} : If the people who own both the Republican and Democratic tried their best to make Trump lose the Republican primary why would they all of a sudden want him to win against Clinton?', '>>{drive_me_away} : And I thought she was the smart and nice one.', ">>{fusionpit} : Don't forget being bailed out by daddy at every turn", '>>{Nathan_canine} : And whose bankruptcy agreement had him given a 400k/month allowance.', '>>{Jellybeanmix} : Slimey fuckers all of them just showing there true intentions to milk Americans.', ">>{SATexas1} : Hillary supports the death penalty? Wow, I didn't know that. That's barbaric, I wonder how many people have been executed that were innocent or mentally ill.", '>>{ienfull} : We need more free college degrees so more people can be smart like I am. Too many stupids voted in the last election!', '>>{Cupinacup} : She\'s against it in general except for extreme cases for that very reason. The question is whether or not DSR\'s actions meet the "extreme" requirement.', '>>{bottomlines} : Hahaha, right... So the people who live in his apartment buildings (Steven Spielberg, Christiano Ronaldo etc) are middle class plebs? The members of his golf clubs with a $300,000 membership fee (Bill Clinton etc) are middle class plebs?', ">>{SATexas1} : Who qualifies what's an extreme case, and how could you ever know for certain that you'd never make a mistake? It's not like when they set up the current death penalty systems they weren't trying to target extreme cases, clearly they've failed and clearly they've executed innocent people. That's a ridiculous, short sighted position - totally lacking courage.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Either you are for death penalty or not. Clinton has made it clear time and time again that she supports DP. Not sure what the angle of this article is', '>>{bottomlines} : She also wore a dress she designed herself when she gave her speech at the RNC. Though it only costs about $200.', ">>{SATexas1} : Executing turrists doesn't do anything good. I'm down with killing people in a battle, taking out combatants, removing enemies from positions that they can harm people etc... I think the govt is hiding 28 pages of material from us that show that we don't know what a turrist is.", '>>{polishedrhythm18} : Wut??? If thats the case how can you possibly think Hillary Clinton is part of the left? She is Mrs. Wall Street. HAHA I mean gimme a break. Reviewing stocks makes you right wing propaganda.', ">>{footballfan123} : 5/7 No actual swastika ornaments. Won't buy again.", ">>{mommy2libras} : You don't have to have a college degree to have intelligence. Even my kids can detect bullshit when they hear it.", '>>{p1um5mu991er} : The visual that comes to my mind is the scene in *Goodfellas* where all the wives are talking and applying gobs of makeup to their face', ">>{Brad_Wesley} : > Yet Trump was elected. It boggles the imagination. Don't forget he was running against Hillary Clinton. The Clintons are pretty much hucksters themselves.", ">>{terrymr} : The same rag that claims that : A) the Clinton foundation is closing down B) it's because Clinton lost to trump", ">>{OdinSQL} : She needs to find out how support of the death penalty polls among likely democratic primary voters in California. If either side pro or con has 60% or more support she's always held the same opinion.", '>>{EggbroHam} : She said she supports the death penalty, period. I dont believe she made a comment about Roof', '>>{OdinSQL} : South Carolina has already voted so her opinion has likely "evolved".', '>>{polishedrhythm18} : You had to go 3 clicks deep to find that story. That isnt anywhere on the front page. But hey have fun calling it a "rag"', ">>{Cupinacup} : I'm not pro-death penalty, but I can see the argument for DSR getting it. I can't think of a single instance in which he's not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. There's a large difference between his case and those of intellectually disabled people, cases with poor evidence, improper legal representation, etc.", ">>{terrymr} : I imagine it isn't on the front page any more, it wasn't from today.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Sure they can. Visa or MasterCard . The only wealthy people you will see buying this will be real housewives of New Jersey.', ">>{sennhauser} : Theoretically there is nothing wrong with it, but it's just tasteless. As if the billionaire daughter needs more money.", '>>{p1um5mu991er} : Trump gets to live the rest of his life like a schnook?', '>>{KingPickle} : Act now and get a free Trump Steak with every purchase!', ">>{TruffleNShuffle} : Probably eight. Don't forget W. Everyone was so sure he couldn't win. And then....", ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : Just execute Roof and get it over with. He killed 9 people - why is his life so special? He's not innocent. Just get it over with - why does he deserve to live? Give him a speedy trial, and then take him out back and hang him. Done. Sends a strong message as well - you murder, you go as well. Instead these murderers get life in prison and unlimited pussy and internet.", ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : [So it's in a box with one of these slapped on it?](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/EgyUMNIczRNgzHIhbehGdsVLsHkkeSvXodx8K71IisNY-iWLNnqm2q-nb-2V1FiT-qE=w300)", ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : [So it's got one of these slapped on the box?](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/EgyUMNIczRNgzHIhbehGdsVLsHkkeSvXodx8K71IisNY-iWLNnqm2q-nb-2V1FiT-qE=w300)", '>>{xslracket} : The death penalty has never proven to lower crime.', ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : > The death penalty has never proven to lower crime. Really? Death is not a deterrent? Because I know for a fact most people are scared to shit of death. I mean, I don't see any professional Russian roulette players after all.", ">>{darksiderising} : She said she supports the death penalty. She didn't weigh in about this particular case.", ">>{Cupinacup} : > Instead these murderers get life in prison and unlimited pussy and internet. Apparently facts don't matter.", '>>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : False dichotomy. People can be against it except in extreme circumstances. People are allowed to have nuanced political views.', ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : > https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/04/30/theres-still-no-evidence-that-executions-deter-criminals/ The evidence is that murderers always try to avoid the death penalty. If the death penalty didn't work why do 99.6% of murderers choose life in prison? That's a higher percentage of people choosing to live in Malibu than a third world war zone country. I bet you a million bucks Roof is going to do everything he can to avoid the death penalty.", '>>{demagogue451} : You can be for the death penalty and also think that not everyone should be sentenced to death.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Of course . You're still a DP supporter though .", '>>{ONinAB} : But the point is, is that there are still murderers in places where there is the death penalty, not that convicted murderers chose life imprisonment.', '>>{demagogue451} : I think gandalf taught us an important lesson in LOTR by instructing frodo to spare golum. No matter how bad someone seems you never know what good things they may do later in life, even if only by accident. Maybe dylan roof will write an inspiring book from prison in 25 years which will change people\'s lives for the better, maybe even saving lives, maybe far more than 9 lives. Even someone who is in prison for life can potentially have a positive impact on society. We shouldn\'t kill anyone unless we absolutely have to, and we can just throw him in prison for life so we don\'t have to kill him. The death penalty just seems like revenge, and it is pointless. Bear in mind it\'s more expensive to the taxpayer to put someone to death than to imprison them for life. It is not beneficial to society to seek the death penalty. So the question is not "why does he deserve to live?" It is "why does he need to die?" And the answer is that he doesnt.', ">>{Shillin4Bernie} : Nah. What do you with someone in Prison that keeps killing their cellmates because they already have life in prison? I support 3 strike you're out. Kill 3+ people in 3 seperate provable instances and we're taking you out so you can't kill anymore.", '>>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : Tell me, how much gray exists in that world of yours?', ">>{valleyshrew} : And she'd tell him she still supports imprisoning criminals, even though some people have turned out to be innocent. Justice cannot be perfect. Innocent people have to be jailed sometimes and a lot of people don't realise that. If you're unwilling to ever jail an innocent person, you have to free 99.9% of prisoners. Most people wont want to live in a country where you can't imprison people.", ">>{NoIWillNotYield} : That's what I'm saying. They support Hillary because they want trump to win.", '>>{Grnmntman} : They support her because of a blind eye to reality.', '>>{Meatsim1} : Maybe she thinks it might be unprofessional for a possible soon-to-be President to make commits that could sway the outcome of a federal court case?', ">>{DamagedHells} : She shouldn't. Her husband oversaw the state-sponsored murder of a mentally ill man, though. Immediately left his campaign trail to do it.", '>>{ZarqxKombat} : At least with imprisonment, it can be partially reversed. Theres no going back from execution.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : this isn't a gray area. You can certainly nitpick over which crimes deserve death penalty and which don't- but that's still being in support of the death penalty.", ">>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : There's a difference between supporting the death penalty unequivocally and supporting it only in extreme circumstances. You can say that both positions support the death penalty, and you'd be right, but that oversimplifies the issue in terms of realistic solutions. Sometimes I wish I lived in a world where things were so simple.", ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : sorry I just don't see the gray area in reality. the ONLY hypothetical I can imagine would be if there was some super homicidal criminal that no jail could hold. If you are against the death penalty, you're against it plain and simple. People against DP don't want the state to have the power to kill citizens, regardless of the bad they have done. They also see a moral hypocrisy.... Protection of the public is of course tantamount- so these dangerous individuals gets life in prison- max security if needed. DP serves no purpose other than retribution- which is wrong- regardless of the severity of the crime. Anyway thats the anti-death penalty view and it is black and white for them."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Murderers_Row_Boat} : Ivanka Trump company promotes $10,000 bracelet worn on '60 Minutes'", '>>{Murderers_Row_Boat} : Nothing says, "Respecting the Presidency" like using it to sell gaudy, over-priced jewelry to rich people.', ">>{jbgobgob} : The Trumps are hilariously transparent hucksters. This is their version of 'doing good business.' They come off as the lousiest salespeople ever, who would be far more at home at a late 19th-century carnival selling snake oil or on TV infomercials. Yet Trump was elected. It boggles the imagination.", ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Rich people don't buy that crap. Trump brand is for middle plebs who think they are rich", '>>{Mae315} : So this is our President and first family for the next 4 years...', ">>{Murderers_Row_Boat} : Rich people will start buying if they know what's good for them. They won't want a visit from President Trump's Immigration/Trump Family Marketing Force.", '>>{drive_me_away} : And I thought she was the smart and nice one.', '>>{Jellybeanmix} : Slimey fuckers all of them just showing there true intentions to milk Americans.', '>>{bottomlines} : Hahaha, right... So the people who live in his apartment buildings (Steven Spielberg, Christiano Ronaldo etc) are middle class plebs? The members of his golf clubs with a $300,000 membership fee (Bill Clinton etc) are middle class plebs?', '>>{bottomlines} : She also wore a dress she designed herself when she gave her speech at the RNC. Though it only costs about $200.', ">>{footballfan123} : 5/7 No actual swastika ornaments. Won't buy again.", '>>{p1um5mu991er} : The visual that comes to my mind is the scene in *Goodfellas* where all the wives are talking and applying gobs of makeup to their face', ">>{Brad_Wesley} : > Yet Trump was elected. It boggles the imagination. Don't forget he was running against Hillary Clinton. The Clintons are pretty much hucksters themselves.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Sure they can. Visa or MasterCard . The only wealthy people you will see buying this will be real housewives of New Jersey.', ">>{sennhauser} : Theoretically there is nothing wrong with it, but it's just tasteless. As if the billionaire daughter needs more money.", '>>{p1um5mu991er} : Trump gets to live the rest of his life like a schnook?', '>>{KingPickle} : Act now and get a free Trump Steak with every purchase!', ">>{TruffleNShuffle} : Probably eight. Don't forget W. Everyone was so sure he couldn't win. And then....", ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : [So it's in a box with one of these slapped on it?](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/EgyUMNIczRNgzHIhbehGdsVLsHkkeSvXodx8K71IisNY-iWLNnqm2q-nb-2V1FiT-qE=w300)", ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : [So it's got one of these slapped on the box?](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/EgyUMNIczRNgzHIhbehGdsVLsHkkeSvXodx8K71IisNY-iWLNnqm2q-nb-2V1FiT-qE=w300)"], ['>>{_Deplorable} : Trump has made a career out of having people underestimate his savvy, instincts and, yes, intelligence. Elites in both major political parties did this all last year, and now will watch from the sidelines as Trump swears to uphold the Constitution.', ">>{PrettyMuchAVegetable} : Dumb dumbs can vote for dumb dumbs. I've seen no evidence Trump is intelligent.", '>>{polishedrhythm18} : No it isnt. 99.9999% of their article are dedicated to covering the market and stocks. With a slight sliver of some opinions which may affect the market long term.', '>>{ohheyitsdeejay} : Yes, we all underestimated that scrappy youngster that was given an 8 million dollar loan to start off his career. What an underdog.', '>>{veridique} : LOL. Their opinion pieces make the WSJ opinion pieces seem progressive.', ">>{Grumpy_Cunt} : At this point it makes more sense to conclude that the system has rewarded Trump's specific type of dumbness rather than that he is not dumb. All the people who point to his financial and now political success as proof that he is not a moron aren't acknowledging the possibility that a certain kind of moron, with enough ego and inherited wealth and sheer dumb luck, can fail upwards, all the way to the white house. That should sound crazy, but it still makes more sense to me than the possibility that Trump is secretly smart. In 30+ years of public speaking he hasn't, even accidentally, managed a single sentence that couldn't have come out of the mouth of a (horrible) child.", ">>{manster62} : It wasn't his intelligence, lets put that to rest. He hooked up with billionaires who had a political agenda. They take control and will weild power through Trump. They want what only an authoritarian, power mad King can give them. Total control of the country from the government. I was watching a Chinese business spokesman yesterday on the difference between American capitalism and the Chinese market economy. He said that business controls the American government so policies cannot change under a two party system. In China, policies can change because of a party system where business doesn't control the government. They work for the interest of the country, not just a few.", '>>{Grumpy_Cunt} : He\'s not smart. He\'s not even "like smart". At best I will concede that he might be alt-smart.', ">>{fusionpit} : Don't forget being bailed out by daddy at every turn", '>>{Nathan_canine} : And whose bankruptcy agreement had him given a 400k/month allowance.', '>>{ienfull} : We need more free college degrees so more people can be smart like I am. Too many stupids voted in the last election!', '>>{polishedrhythm18} : Wut??? If thats the case how can you possibly think Hillary Clinton is part of the left? She is Mrs. Wall Street. HAHA I mean gimme a break. Reviewing stocks makes you right wing propaganda.', ">>{mommy2libras} : You don't have to have a college degree to have intelligence. Even my kids can detect bullshit when they hear it.", ">>{terrymr} : The same rag that claims that : A) the Clinton foundation is closing down B) it's because Clinton lost to trump", '>>{polishedrhythm18} : You had to go 3 clicks deep to find that story. That isnt anywhere on the front page. But hey have fun calling it a "rag"', ">>{terrymr} : I imagine it isn't on the front page any more, it wasn't from today."], ['>>{Grnmntman} : Why are we still considering her a viable candidate after the IG report.', '>>{NoIWillNotYield} : She already said she does in a South Carolina town hall....', ">>{Grnmntman} : Not at all, it's clear that Sanders is a much much stronger general election candidate. If they want Trump to win they want to face Hillary.", ">>{olov244} : she does and mob mentality agrees. this is another issue that is popular but the moral choice needs to be argued. no different than invading iraq, regime changes, tax cuts, etc. just because it's popular doesn't mean it's the right thing to do", '>>{WelcomeToBoshwitz} : She said she does in a South Carolina town hall.', '>>{Themostunderdisturb} : If the people who own both the Republican and Democratic tried their best to make Trump lose the Republican primary why would they all of a sudden want him to win against Clinton?', ">>{SATexas1} : Hillary supports the death penalty? Wow, I didn't know that. That's barbaric, I wonder how many people have been executed that were innocent or mentally ill.", '>>{Cupinacup} : She\'s against it in general except for extreme cases for that very reason. The question is whether or not DSR\'s actions meet the "extreme" requirement.', ">>{SATexas1} : Who qualifies what's an extreme case, and how could you ever know for certain that you'd never make a mistake? It's not like when they set up the current death penalty systems they weren't trying to target extreme cases, clearly they've failed and clearly they've executed innocent people. That's a ridiculous, short sighted position - totally lacking courage.", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Either you are for death penalty or not. Clinton has made it clear time and time again that she supports DP. Not sure what the angle of this article is', ">>{SATexas1} : Executing turrists doesn't do anything good. I'm down with killing people in a battle, taking out combatants, removing enemies from positions that they can harm people etc... I think the govt is hiding 28 pages of material from us that show that we don't know what a turrist is.", ">>{OdinSQL} : She needs to find out how support of the death penalty polls among likely democratic primary voters in California. If either side pro or con has 60% or more support she's always held the same opinion.", '>>{EggbroHam} : She said she supports the death penalty, period. I dont believe she made a comment about Roof', '>>{OdinSQL} : South Carolina has already voted so her opinion has likely "evolved".', ">>{Cupinacup} : I'm not pro-death penalty, but I can see the argument for DSR getting it. I can't think of a single instance in which he's not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. There's a large difference between his case and those of intellectually disabled people, cases with poor evidence, improper legal representation, etc.", ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : Just execute Roof and get it over with. He killed 9 people - why is his life so special? He's not innocent. Just get it over with - why does he deserve to live? Give him a speedy trial, and then take him out back and hang him. Done. Sends a strong message as well - you murder, you go as well. Instead these murderers get life in prison and unlimited pussy and internet.", '>>{xslracket} : The death penalty has never proven to lower crime.', ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : > The death penalty has never proven to lower crime. Really? Death is not a deterrent? Because I know for a fact most people are scared to shit of death. I mean, I don't see any professional Russian roulette players after all.", ">>{darksiderising} : She said she supports the death penalty. She didn't weigh in about this particular case.", ">>{Cupinacup} : > Instead these murderers get life in prison and unlimited pussy and internet. Apparently facts don't matter.", '>>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : False dichotomy. People can be against it except in extreme circumstances. People are allowed to have nuanced political views.', ">>{OnlyFactsMatter} : > https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/04/30/theres-still-no-evidence-that-executions-deter-criminals/ The evidence is that murderers always try to avoid the death penalty. If the death penalty didn't work why do 99.6% of murderers choose life in prison? That's a higher percentage of people choosing to live in Malibu than a third world war zone country. I bet you a million bucks Roof is going to do everything he can to avoid the death penalty.", '>>{demagogue451} : You can be for the death penalty and also think that not everyone should be sentenced to death.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Of course . You're still a DP supporter though .", '>>{ONinAB} : But the point is, is that there are still murderers in places where there is the death penalty, not that convicted murderers chose life imprisonment.', '>>{demagogue451} : I think gandalf taught us an important lesson in LOTR by instructing frodo to spare golum. No matter how bad someone seems you never know what good things they may do later in life, even if only by accident. Maybe dylan roof will write an inspiring book from prison in 25 years which will change people\'s lives for the better, maybe even saving lives, maybe far more than 9 lives. Even someone who is in prison for life can potentially have a positive impact on society. We shouldn\'t kill anyone unless we absolutely have to, and we can just throw him in prison for life so we don\'t have to kill him. The death penalty just seems like revenge, and it is pointless. Bear in mind it\'s more expensive to the taxpayer to put someone to death than to imprison them for life. It is not beneficial to society to seek the death penalty. So the question is not "why does he deserve to live?" It is "why does he need to die?" And the answer is that he doesnt.', ">>{Shillin4Bernie} : Nah. What do you with someone in Prison that keeps killing their cellmates because they already have life in prison? I support 3 strike you're out. Kill 3+ people in 3 seperate provable instances and we're taking you out so you can't kill anymore.", '>>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : Tell me, how much gray exists in that world of yours?', ">>{valleyshrew} : And she'd tell him she still supports imprisoning criminals, even though some people have turned out to be innocent. Justice cannot be perfect. Innocent people have to be jailed sometimes and a lot of people don't realise that. If you're unwilling to ever jail an innocent person, you have to free 99.9% of prisoners. Most people wont want to live in a country where you can't imprison people.", ">>{NoIWillNotYield} : That's what I'm saying. They support Hillary because they want trump to win.", '>>{Grnmntman} : They support her because of a blind eye to reality.', '>>{Meatsim1} : Maybe she thinks it might be unprofessional for a possible soon-to-be President to make commits that could sway the outcome of a federal court case?', ">>{DamagedHells} : She shouldn't. Her husband oversaw the state-sponsored murder of a mentally ill man, though. Immediately left his campaign trail to do it.", '>>{ZarqxKombat} : At least with imprisonment, it can be partially reversed. Theres no going back from execution.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : this isn't a gray area. You can certainly nitpick over which crimes deserve death penalty and which don't- but that's still being in support of the death penalty.", ">>{PartTimeMisanthrope} : There's a difference between supporting the death penalty unequivocally and supporting it only in extreme circumstances. You can say that both positions support the death penalty, and you'd be right, but that oversimplifies the issue in terms of realistic solutions. Sometimes I wish I lived in a world where things were so simple.", ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : sorry I just don't see the gray area in reality. the ONLY hypothetical I can imagine would be if there was some super homicidal criminal that no jail could hold. If you are against the death penalty, you're against it plain and simple. People against DP don't want the state to have the power to kill citizens, regardless of the bad they have done. They also see a moral hypocrisy.... Protection of the public is of course tantamount- so these dangerous individuals gets life in prison- max security if needed. DP serves no purpose other than retribution- which is wrong- regardless of the severity of the crime. Anyway thats the anti-death penalty view and it is black and white for them."]]

classify and reply

['>>{speckz} : Trump calls recount efforts ‘sad,’ declares: ‘Nothing will change’', ">>{Belong_to_me} : The smallest margin that could be doubted, Pennsylvania by 70,000 votes, is greater than any discrepancies ever corrected by a recount. I find it telling that we were browbeat with the idea that electronic voting was unhackable when Trump questioned it, we're told there's absolutely no sign of hacking or interference this election cycle, but the Democratic pity party is willing to put all common sense aside in search of a Christmas miracle?", '>>{dunkeater} : > few insurers seem to be taking sizeable profits out of the exchanges. What a load of bullshit.', '>>{Neo2199} : So naive! > [Trump](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/787995025527410688): **Of course there is large scale voter fraud happening on and before election day. Why do Republican leaders deny what is going on? So naive!**', '>>{RnqsgdqmIda} : Terrorism doesn’t help Trump. Just look at the polls.', '>>{RepelGropers} : The recount is happening. He should accept it. Instead of making a fool of himself and his supporters on Twitter yet again.', ">>{Belong_to_me} : Oh right, I misspoke. I hold no hopes for Michigan because of how they certify their vote totals. There's no rigging possible there and a recount is highly unlikely. They've already counted twice and each individual location has certified their double checked totals.", ">>{Melonpot} : Wow that is a total tweetstorm even by Trumps standards, if it won't change anything why make your self look like a total idiot on twitter? So embarrassing. Guilty AF acting like this! Its happening its legal, and reasonable when your the opponent, this is trump ffs the man just settled a 25m fraud case, what a fucking drama Queen. Its happening bitch!", ">>{black_flag_4ever} : Let's recount California too. It makes just as much sense.", '>>{x__________x} : Trump never questioned the vote being hacked. He and his supporters were saying that the Democrats were busing in illegal immigrants to vote, that Democrats are padding their votes with dead citizens, and that people in large cities were going to vote twice or multiple times. He even called for his supporters to go out and monitor the polls for that sort of voter fraud.', ">>{PTSD_and_Guns} : He's right, nothing will change. He will be our next president.", ">>{because_im_boring} : They aren't sizable enough, but are still making a profit", '>>{wytxcook} : How about you, are you making a profit?', '>>{dunkeater} : >Total revenues of the top eight players -- six of them mentioned above, plus Anthem, Inc. ( ANT ) and Humana Inc. ( HUM ) -- increased to $437 billion in 2015 from $383 billion in 2014 and medical enrollment grew to 150 million members from 145 million in 2014. Source: http://www.nasdaq.com/article/health-insurance-stock-outlook-feb-2016-cm580660', '>>{CarmineFields} : Yeah? Does a new mother getting shot on the street help Trump? He sure seemed to think so', '>>{RnqsgdqmIda} : Lying Trump likes to pretend he is a big guy against it even though his two BFFs Putin and Assad are homicidal maniacs. But I bet he would be if he could be running things like he really wants to. Of course Lying Trump really wants to go to the Kremlin and let Putin have his way with him and Melana. Rick Wilson was saying on twitter she used to get paid for that when she was an illegal but not sure if she was paid or not myself. What do you think?', '>>{wytxcook} : No. It tears a family apart and leaves a child motherless. You "liberals" are more upset at Trump, than you are at the person that murdered that mother.', ">>{Walking-Eagle} : There's no question many insurers are losing big money on Obamacare. Costs exceeded income by 5% in 2014, and that figure doubled the following year, according to McKinsey's Center for U.S. Health System Reform. Losses are expected to grow this year. Only 30% of insurers ran profitable individual divisions in 2014. That share slipped to about a quarter last year, according to McKinsey. [Source](http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/17/news/economy/obamacare-insurers/)", ">>{quoraboy} : Recount is not audit. It won't make a huge difference. Not a trump supporter, but recount is actually nothing. They are gonna check the tally. That's all.", '>>{alexanderwales} : Why did you put "liberals" in quotes there?', ">>{Trumfkortet} : Total revenues aren't informative. For example, as of January [Aetna’s exchange business represented 5 percent of its total membership and 6 percent of its total operating revenue.](http://fortune.com/2016/01/13/aetna-ceo-public-health/)", ">>{RepelGropers} : It'll take out the padded vote totals. Like in Appleton WI. Trump sure seems nervous.", '>>{Belong_to_me} : Yep. I was referring to the fact that he cast myriad and sometimes vague aspersions on the system. He said things like "something is happening" and "we\'ve got to watch that closely" in reference to voting fraud in general. But you don\'t have to tell me. I voted for him.', ">>{LBJ20XX} : Best part about this is that Trump is playing the part of Hillary if Hillary won and Hillary (I know it's not really her, but you get what I'm saying) is playing the part of Trump if Hillary won. So basically only difference here is the actors are different. Same show though.", '>>{catpor} : A loss was expected as a result from covering people whom were previously uncovered. The biggest "payoff" is down the line, when more people are more healthy from the resultant care, but insurance companies are quoting the short term to make it sound so much worse than it actually is.', '>>{wytxcook} : I think you need to read a different outlet.', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : /r/the_donald is so terrified one of Trump\'s supporters are going to commit a terrorist attack [they are already blaming it on Clinton as a huge conspiracy.](https://np.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/53qkyf/paul_joseph_watson_says_hillary_will_stage_a/) This is the same guy who spread the story off 4chan that [the bombing in Chelsea was a "Crazed Leftist"](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/18/alt-right-seizes-on-unlikely-manifesto-to-blame-chelsea-bombing-on-crazed-leftist.html)', ">>{dudeguypal} : Exactly. And they knew it too. Them pulling out is 100% due to the blocking of the merger. It's blackmail basically.", ">>{Walking-Eagle} : Not necessarily. Many have argued that the public option would siphon off sicker, more expensive patients (adverse selection), which would actually be to the benefit of private insurers. That wouldn't be good for the system as a whole, of course.", ">>{CarmineFields} : The person that shot her will get justice. Trump won't.", ">>{Walking-Eagle} : A good system is good for people, by definition, and a public option is not meant to threaten private insurers but to add an alternative. The question is whether this mix would work. The author of this article doesn't think so; others disagree.", ">>{wytxcook} : The dead woman's family will get justice, the murderer will get punishment and then let back out of prison to do it the fuck again like prior. So maybe that woman's family, like the victims family before won't get justice after all.", ">>{YourPoliticalParty} : Full Disclosure: The author is *literally* in bed with someone currently trying to write US health insurance policy. Don't even waste your time.", ">>{CongratsBroGoodJob} : Why can't we just accept the fact that the free market sometimes is incapable of doing something well? It didn't do health insurance well before Obamacare (it was even worse) and it doesn't do it well now.", '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : Learn some new words, Donald. Turn off your phone and read a book.', ">>{CarmineFields} : And Trump's life-long fraud? How long will he see in jail for it?", ">>{quoraboy} : I am sure he is nervous, but Trump's presidency is in trouble when DOJ audit mid west states which most likely will not happen. Even Obama presidency is not in favor of adult.", '>>{ashesashesdustdust} : so when you screamed that the election is rigged 50 times, that was a (gasp) LIE????', ">>{ashesashesdustdust} : he should be excited that we're going to uncover large scale democrat voter fraud just like he said!", '>>{wytxcook} : Once again a "liberal" proves they have no grip on reality.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Whenever there\'s a terrorist attack people tell me Trump\'s numbers are going to go up. I\'ve yet to see convincing evidence of this. The only people it "helps" him with is republicans. He doesn\'t need republicans, he needs independents and centrist democrats. The GOP loves blood and death, this isn\'t news. It is also not news that they confuse their own desires for mass carnage with how the rest of America thinks. If he "goes up in the polls!" the effect lasts about an hour until he says something stupid and his numbers plummet again', '>>{watchout5} : The recount is in, Clinton still got more votes than Trump, and Clinton still loses. This totally makes sense in communist America!', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Whenever bad shit happens Trump\'s response is self congratulatory, callous, comments about how he "called it". After that he starts advocating widespread death and prejudice as government policy. The Bush administration "got tough". Now we have ISIS. So forgive me for thinking Trumps very presence in our politics is a danger to national security and will only make this situation worse.', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Doubt it. Trump called for a revolution in 2012 when he thought Romney wont he popular vote.', '>>{Belong_to_me} : Bottom line, I support the recount. Let the stupid whining be quashed or validated. We need free and fair elections. We *have* them, outside of non-citizens and dead people and the paid homeless. If we take a more critical eye to those small discrepancies, fine by me.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : You got a good one? No really, where do you get your news?', ">>{Belong_to_me} : Wisconsin wouldn't change the results of the election. Then again, that doesn't matter to you. Wisconsin will likely stay Trump. Michigan's totals have always been certified IE counted twice. Sure, count them a third time. Denial is the first step in grief, after all. If we can finally get past that, maybe we can start being neighbors instead of enemies. All the while, the new administration will be chugging along regardless of the media axis of evil.", ">>{wytxcook} : Generally I go to Google news, and look for the most sensible headline on the topic I'm interested in reading about. If the article is fairly written about the subject, I'll search the subject specifically in hopes find more info without the editorial. Usually leads to WIKI.", ">>{CarmineFields} : Contractors, pay-through charity, trump university, trump's election staff. It goes on and on.", '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Really? 4 different mobs attacking Trump supporters and not one pulls a gun in justifiable self defense. Meanwhile BLM has gotten how many cops killed and injured? Not to mention the Hillary Clinton backer that gunned down 50+ gay people in a night club', '>>{Belong_to_me} : Equate "my neighbor" with a corporation of partisan talking heads with the sole aim of dismantling Donald Trump. I\'m talking about normal people. Americans who aren\'t owned by their party affiliation. People who have compassion and can see reason. Is starving the populace of truth and fomenting violent rebellion based on race less cruel? Obviously, I\'m barking up the wrong tree by continuing a conversation with you.', ">>{starphaser} : As great as it would be to get an audit, it is super unlikely just like you said. The only way I can really see it happening is if they notice something really weird when they are counting the votes. That's pretty unlikely though.", ">>{WetSandwichTrump} : It's rigged, folks. Uh, buhlieve me. Folks!", '>>{ugen64} : Really? Clinton won California by nearly 3.4m votes. How is that on the same planet as recounting a state where the margin was 27,000 votes like Wisconsin?', ">>{Eh_for_Effort} : All projection from hillary's camp onto trump. It's sad really.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : > and look for the most sensible headline on the topic So basically you just click on the one that agrees with you? How shocking.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : >BLM has gotten how many cops killed and injured? I believe the count for cops killing people is over 1000 now for this year', ">>{wytxcook} : Google news is an aggregate that provides a variety of sources and the opportunity filter biases - Slate provides no variety and 100% bias. You made an incorrect assumption, but that's par for the course on this sub.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : > and the opportunity filter biases Correction, the opportunity for you to filter things that hurt your fee fees.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{RnqsgdqmIda} : Terrorism doesn’t help Trump. Just look at the polls.', '>>{CarmineFields} : Yeah? Does a new mother getting shot on the street help Trump? He sure seemed to think so', '>>{RnqsgdqmIda} : Lying Trump likes to pretend he is a big guy against it even though his two BFFs Putin and Assad are homicidal maniacs. But I bet he would be if he could be running things like he really wants to. Of course Lying Trump really wants to go to the Kremlin and let Putin have his way with him and Melana. Rick Wilson was saying on twitter she used to get paid for that when she was an illegal but not sure if she was paid or not myself. What do you think?', '>>{wytxcook} : No. It tears a family apart and leaves a child motherless. You "liberals" are more upset at Trump, than you are at the person that murdered that mother.', '>>{alexanderwales} : Why did you put "liberals" in quotes there?', '>>{wytxcook} : I think you need to read a different outlet.', '>>{75000_Tokkul} : /r/the_donald is so terrified one of Trump\'s supporters are going to commit a terrorist attack [they are already blaming it on Clinton as a huge conspiracy.](https://np.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/53qkyf/paul_joseph_watson_says_hillary_will_stage_a/) This is the same guy who spread the story off 4chan that [the bombing in Chelsea was a "Crazed Leftist"](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/18/alt-right-seizes-on-unlikely-manifesto-to-blame-chelsea-bombing-on-crazed-leftist.html)', ">>{CarmineFields} : The person that shot her will get justice. Trump won't.", ">>{wytxcook} : The dead woman's family will get justice, the murderer will get punishment and then let back out of prison to do it the fuck again like prior. So maybe that woman's family, like the victims family before won't get justice after all.", ">>{CarmineFields} : And Trump's life-long fraud? How long will he see in jail for it?", '>>{wytxcook} : Once again a "liberal" proves they have no grip on reality.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Whenever there\'s a terrorist attack people tell me Trump\'s numbers are going to go up. I\'ve yet to see convincing evidence of this. The only people it "helps" him with is republicans. He doesn\'t need republicans, he needs independents and centrist democrats. The GOP loves blood and death, this isn\'t news. It is also not news that they confuse their own desires for mass carnage with how the rest of America thinks. If he "goes up in the polls!" the effect lasts about an hour until he says something stupid and his numbers plummet again', '>>{oldoneeyed} : Whenever bad shit happens Trump\'s response is self congratulatory, callous, comments about how he "called it". After that he starts advocating widespread death and prejudice as government policy. The Bush administration "got tough". Now we have ISIS. So forgive me for thinking Trumps very presence in our politics is a danger to national security and will only make this situation worse.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : You got a good one? No really, where do you get your news?', ">>{wytxcook} : Generally I go to Google news, and look for the most sensible headline on the topic I'm interested in reading about. If the article is fairly written about the subject, I'll search the subject specifically in hopes find more info without the editorial. Usually leads to WIKI.", ">>{CarmineFields} : Contractors, pay-through charity, trump university, trump's election staff. It goes on and on.", '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : Really? 4 different mobs attacking Trump supporters and not one pulls a gun in justifiable self defense. Meanwhile BLM has gotten how many cops killed and injured? Not to mention the Hillary Clinton backer that gunned down 50+ gay people in a night club', ">>{Eh_for_Effort} : All projection from hillary's camp onto trump. It's sad really.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : > and look for the most sensible headline on the topic So basically you just click on the one that agrees with you? How shocking.', '>>{oldoneeyed} : >BLM has gotten how many cops killed and injured? I believe the count for cops killing people is over 1000 now for this year', ">>{wytxcook} : Google news is an aggregate that provides a variety of sources and the opportunity filter biases - Slate provides no variety and 100% bias. You made an incorrect assumption, but that's par for the course on this sub.", '>>{oldoneeyed} : > and the opportunity filter biases Correction, the opportunity for you to filter things that hurt your fee fees.'], ['>>{dunkeater} : > few insurers seem to be taking sizeable profits out of the exchanges. What a load of bullshit.', ">>{because_im_boring} : They aren't sizable enough, but are still making a profit", '>>{wytxcook} : How about you, are you making a profit?', '>>{dunkeater} : >Total revenues of the top eight players -- six of them mentioned above, plus Anthem, Inc. ( ANT ) and Humana Inc. ( HUM ) -- increased to $437 billion in 2015 from $383 billion in 2014 and medical enrollment grew to 150 million members from 145 million in 2014. Source: http://www.nasdaq.com/article/health-insurance-stock-outlook-feb-2016-cm580660', ">>{Walking-Eagle} : There's no question many insurers are losing big money on Obamacare. Costs exceeded income by 5% in 2014, and that figure doubled the following year, according to McKinsey's Center for U.S. Health System Reform. Losses are expected to grow this year. Only 30% of insurers ran profitable individual divisions in 2014. That share slipped to about a quarter last year, according to McKinsey. [Source](http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/17/news/economy/obamacare-insurers/)", ">>{Trumfkortet} : Total revenues aren't informative. For example, as of January [Aetna’s exchange business represented 5 percent of its total membership and 6 percent of its total operating revenue.](http://fortune.com/2016/01/13/aetna-ceo-public-health/)", '>>{catpor} : A loss was expected as a result from covering people whom were previously uncovered. The biggest "payoff" is down the line, when more people are more healthy from the resultant care, but insurance companies are quoting the short term to make it sound so much worse than it actually is.', ">>{dudeguypal} : Exactly. And they knew it too. Them pulling out is 100% due to the blocking of the merger. It's blackmail basically.", ">>{Walking-Eagle} : Not necessarily. Many have argued that the public option would siphon off sicker, more expensive patients (adverse selection), which would actually be to the benefit of private insurers. That wouldn't be good for the system as a whole, of course.", ">>{Walking-Eagle} : A good system is good for people, by definition, and a public option is not meant to threaten private insurers but to add an alternative. The question is whether this mix would work. The author of this article doesn't think so; others disagree.", ">>{YourPoliticalParty} : Full Disclosure: The author is *literally* in bed with someone currently trying to write US health insurance policy. Don't even waste your time.", ">>{CongratsBroGoodJob} : Why can't we just accept the fact that the free market sometimes is incapable of doing something well? It didn't do health insurance well before Obamacare (it was even worse) and it doesn't do it well now."], ['>>{speckz} : Trump calls recount efforts ‘sad,’ declares: ‘Nothing will change’', ">>{Belong_to_me} : The smallest margin that could be doubted, Pennsylvania by 70,000 votes, is greater than any discrepancies ever corrected by a recount. I find it telling that we were browbeat with the idea that electronic voting was unhackable when Trump questioned it, we're told there's absolutely no sign of hacking or interference this election cycle, but the Democratic pity party is willing to put all common sense aside in search of a Christmas miracle?", '>>{Neo2199} : So naive! > [Trump](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/787995025527410688): **Of course there is large scale voter fraud happening on and before election day. Why do Republican leaders deny what is going on? So naive!**', '>>{RepelGropers} : The recount is happening. He should accept it. Instead of making a fool of himself and his supporters on Twitter yet again.', ">>{Belong_to_me} : Oh right, I misspoke. I hold no hopes for Michigan because of how they certify their vote totals. There's no rigging possible there and a recount is highly unlikely. They've already counted twice and each individual location has certified their double checked totals.", ">>{Melonpot} : Wow that is a total tweetstorm even by Trumps standards, if it won't change anything why make your self look like a total idiot on twitter? So embarrassing. Guilty AF acting like this! Its happening its legal, and reasonable when your the opponent, this is trump ffs the man just settled a 25m fraud case, what a fucking drama Queen. Its happening bitch!", ">>{black_flag_4ever} : Let's recount California too. It makes just as much sense.", '>>{x__________x} : Trump never questioned the vote being hacked. He and his supporters were saying that the Democrats were busing in illegal immigrants to vote, that Democrats are padding their votes with dead citizens, and that people in large cities were going to vote twice or multiple times. He even called for his supporters to go out and monitor the polls for that sort of voter fraud.', ">>{PTSD_and_Guns} : He's right, nothing will change. He will be our next president.", ">>{quoraboy} : Recount is not audit. It won't make a huge difference. Not a trump supporter, but recount is actually nothing. They are gonna check the tally. That's all.", ">>{RepelGropers} : It'll take out the padded vote totals. Like in Appleton WI. Trump sure seems nervous.", '>>{Belong_to_me} : Yep. I was referring to the fact that he cast myriad and sometimes vague aspersions on the system. He said things like "something is happening" and "we\'ve got to watch that closely" in reference to voting fraud in general. But you don\'t have to tell me. I voted for him.', ">>{LBJ20XX} : Best part about this is that Trump is playing the part of Hillary if Hillary won and Hillary (I know it's not really her, but you get what I'm saying) is playing the part of Trump if Hillary won. So basically only difference here is the actors are different. Same show though.", '>>{MAGwastheSHIT} : Learn some new words, Donald. Turn off your phone and read a book.', ">>{quoraboy} : I am sure he is nervous, but Trump's presidency is in trouble when DOJ audit mid west states which most likely will not happen. Even Obama presidency is not in favor of adult.", '>>{ashesashesdustdust} : so when you screamed that the election is rigged 50 times, that was a (gasp) LIE????', ">>{ashesashesdustdust} : he should be excited that we're going to uncover large scale democrat voter fraud just like he said!", '>>{watchout5} : The recount is in, Clinton still got more votes than Trump, and Clinton still loses. This totally makes sense in communist America!', '>>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Doubt it. Trump called for a revolution in 2012 when he thought Romney wont he popular vote.', '>>{Belong_to_me} : Bottom line, I support the recount. Let the stupid whining be quashed or validated. We need free and fair elections. We *have* them, outside of non-citizens and dead people and the paid homeless. If we take a more critical eye to those small discrepancies, fine by me.', ">>{Belong_to_me} : Wisconsin wouldn't change the results of the election. Then again, that doesn't matter to you. Wisconsin will likely stay Trump. Michigan's totals have always been certified IE counted twice. Sure, count them a third time. Denial is the first step in grief, after all. If we can finally get past that, maybe we can start being neighbors instead of enemies. All the while, the new administration will be chugging along regardless of the media axis of evil.", '>>{Belong_to_me} : Equate "my neighbor" with a corporation of partisan talking heads with the sole aim of dismantling Donald Trump. I\'m talking about normal people. Americans who aren\'t owned by their party affiliation. People who have compassion and can see reason. Is starving the populace of truth and fomenting violent rebellion based on race less cruel? Obviously, I\'m barking up the wrong tree by continuing a conversation with you.', ">>{starphaser} : As great as it would be to get an audit, it is super unlikely just like you said. The only way I can really see it happening is if they notice something really weird when they are counting the votes. That's pretty unlikely though.", ">>{WetSandwichTrump} : It's rigged, folks. Uh, buhlieve me. Folks!", '>>{ugen64} : Really? Clinton won California by nearly 3.4m votes. How is that on the same planet as recounting a state where the margin was 27,000 votes like Wisconsin?']]

classify and reply

[">>{ninbushido} : Crowd chants 'you won' during Al Gore speech at Clinton rally in Fla.", '>>{ChestyLaRue83} : Wtf did he think was gonna happen when he stood in front of a camera talking to millions of people asking Russia to find 33,000 emails. Reap what you sow mother fucker.', '>>{FLTA} : Supreme Court hears cases about use of race in redistricting', ">>{yes_a_new_account} : >The state appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing in part that it made districting decisions based on partisan politics, not race. We weren't trying to disenfranchise blacks, we were trying to disenfranchise democrats. It's all good.", '>>{wwarnout} : *"The state appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing in part that it made districting decisions based on partisan politics, not race."* When a state thinks that making these "...districting decisions based on partisan politics..." is a legitimate excuse for gerrymandering, this shows just how screwed up our elections are. Redistricting should be taken away from the states, and be conducted by a non-partisan federal agency.', ">>{aubonpaine} : Because those in the Trump administration know they're on a sinking ship, and those in the federal bureaucracy know that something's rotten. People take an oath to defend and uphold the constitution, not the so-called president.", '>>{FiftyDegreeDay} : Maybe they shouldve chanted "sorry for not poking through the ballot all the way". Damnit Florida, always fucking it up for the rest of us', '>>{FilsDeLiberte} : He did win. The election was stolen by the Supreme Court.', '>>{ozric101} : They wont stop because there are no actual leaks the are simply rumors. It is all a fabrication of the Fake News Media. They need clicks and dog whistles for their small pack of rabid liberal readers.', '>>{Alectr0} : Want to switch to iOS. Which iPhone should I get?', '>>{Vicullum} : So, could these cases finally put an end to gerrymandering?', '>>{Boombollie} : Mitch McConnell Silences Elizabeth Warren on the Senate Floor, preventing her from continuing to read aloud from a letter written by Coretta Scott King in 1986 to oppose the nomination of Jeff Sessions to a federal judgeship.', '>>{leCapitaineEvident} : If the crowd is talking about the 2000 election, they are incorrect.', ">>{fluffykerfuffle1} : this is the part of the rule 19 that they used against warren in the Senate hearing >2. No Senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator. which sounds to me like the hearing cannot hear anything against this guy because he's a senator ....how can this be? it seems logical to me therefore no senator can be nominated for a cabinet position because their qualifications cannot be debated in the Senate.", '>>{cynicallad} : Whenever someone says "you are the most beautiful man (or woman) in the world" they are invariably incorrect, but most people seem to know what they mean anyway.', ">>{youngthugstan} : This is fucking disgusting...horrible to say, but I won't sweat the day that McConnell is gone, either by the vote or by old age.", '>>{FiftyDegreeDay} : Without a doubt, but come on Florida. Between their shitty drivers and old people coming to North Carolina every year and causing mass frustration, and them solely letting Bush get the presidency, I will never respect that state.', ">>{justiceslade} : Everything trump does that I don't approve of is Obama's fault!", '>>{basket_of_adorables} : Well when you never had a source in the first place your "leaks" can continue so long as you don\'t wear your keyboard out typing "sources say."', ">>{aubonpaine} : Trump says they're leaks. So is Trump lying?", '>>{GoldenShowerDonnie} : Is it because Donnie is a piece of shit traitor?', ">>{FiftyDegreeDay} : SCOTUS didn't steal it. Floridas mismanagement did. You can't count ballots and then every precinct ends up having different standards on what is a vote or ineligible and SCOTUS as shitty as it was made a judgement call", ">>{FriesWithThat} : He knows what's in the pipe and is preparing his base to be able to deny the truth of anything published or broadcast in a media outlet. Get them to buy-in now cheap on the easily disprovable stuff like Sweden is a crime-ridden hell-hole, and it'll be so much easier for the core to swallow whole as conspiracy and fake once complicated facts exposing Wikileak drop coordination and incriminating Trump organization financials start getting exposed.", ">>{NemWan} : Racial gerrymandering is indefensible but so is partisan gerrymandering. You can't claim to be voted into office with a mandate to gerrymander in a way that makes it harder for voters to get rid of you.", '>>{j0phus} : No. SCOTUS appointed a President. *That happened.* Gore won by every single measure.', '>>{FLTA} : No but the Wisconsin one might. The cases discussed in the article are the ones about North Carolina and Virginia.', '>>{FiftyDegreeDay} : Read Gore V. Bush. They didnt just randomly appoint him', '>>{MeinDrumpf} : They timed it so that he could vote for DeCunt today. Trumpublicans. Swampy AF.', '>>{BWA_Dallas} : I love my 7, I highly recommend it.', '>>{RonaldDumbsfield} : Tune in to Russia Today for latest news comrades!', ">>{mburke6} : He will either learn to live with the leaks and accept he'll never have 100% loyalty, or there will be a purge.", ">>{oneinfinitecreator} : I think it's more of a strategy to not air out the dirty laundry of the Senate on record. If somebody has a proper complaint, i'm sure there are legal channels to take action with, but using 'offenses' against each other in debate just betrays the public's trust. In fairness to the Republicans, I'm not sure a character assessment from 30 years ago is very relevant to today. It's not an honest way to judge somebody, so I'm not necessarily totally in disagreement. I think Warren could have actually spoke to the here and now instead of dragging some old letter into it... she usually seems more on the ball than the other senators but ended up getting railroaded.", '>>{Vavavoom180} : > Trumpublicans This is how I will be referring to them from now on. We need to forever tie Trump to these spineless elected officials and watch them sink when his cult of personality fails.', ">>{Adam_df} : You're saying Democrats don't know how to criticize positions without personally insulting the person?", ">>{The_Throwaway_King} : I agree that it shouldn't be left to the states, but a non-parison federal agency does not exist.", ">>{CaliforniaWeedBlog} : 6S, I just don't think there is enough on the 7 to justify the higher cost. Apple products are good for a few years so a 6s is future proof for the forseable future. Also you do bring a good point with that next iPhone. Its supposed to be dank af and if thats the case it makes sense to spend less now (6S).", '>>{whatnowdog} : You can find independent non-partisan at the state level. You just keep the politicians out of it as much as possible.', ">>{enragedbreakfast} : If you can get a deal it's worth it. I got mine for $0 on Rogers in Canada, and got a $100 bill credit for switching from my old carrier. Otherwise yeah, 6S is probably a better deal.", '>>{Pedophilecabinet} : I absolutely will start using that. Thank you u/MeinDrumpf', '>>{ghostofpennwast} : Racial gerrymandering works both ways. Too many minorities= racist Too few minorities=racist', ">>{Hnetu} : What qualifies as insulting then? Because apparently to republicans, using their own words in context can be an insult. If I get to decide what's insulting to me, I can decide that anything negative is an insult. And if you're silenced for insulting, I could effectively make you unable to say anything just by claiming it's an insult to my character.", ">>{Muspel} : I *think* that the argument is that there's lots of laws about discrimination based on race, but fewer about discrimination based on political positions, thus it may be that dividing up districts based on partisan politics isn't illegal. It *should* be, but the laws that exist aren't always the same as the ones that should.", ">>{HolgerDane} : Let's say it ~~as~~ is all made up. But then why fire Flynn?", ">>{GuyInAChair} : > It is all a fabrication of the Fake News Media I've never got an answer to this question. If the leaks have been confirmed to be factually correct by the President himself, how can they be *fake news*? Sometimes I feel like I'm missing something obvious, since the people who disagree with me are so insistent that they're right. However, something that is confirmed to be factually correct can not by definition be fake.", ">>{Silospek} : Gerrymandering bums me out so much. Any solution requires the people who benefit from gerrymandering to suddenly feel morally inclined to stop it, so what's the solution?", ">>{TravelKats} : I'd prefer he be voted out of office for the most liberal dem possible....melt that snowflake.", '>>{sleepy_batman1776} : >Ultimately, though, Trump will have to accept that he does not—and cannot have—total control and total allegiance. “How do you cope with leaks?” President Reagan was once asked. “I’ve been told you don’t,” he replied, having already learned a lesson that Trump will soon internalize. “Everybody who has been around here for a while tells me it is just the nature of the place.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPlQpGeTbIE', ">>{m3n0kn0w} : If you normally keep your phones for a few years, I would recommend the 7 because of the larger space and newer components. Those will age better than the 6s. However, if you upgrade rather quickly, the 6s is a great phone and you won't notice any difference in usability.", ">>{DuPage-on-DuSable} : Trump isn't even denying the leaks. He's focusing on how the leaks are illegal. There's a big distinction", '>>{somekindofrabbit} : > If the leaks have been confirmed to be factually correct by the President himself, how can they be fake news Were you not listening to Dear Leader? The leaks are real. The _news_ is fake. The lügenpresse is fakefully reporting on real things.', ">>{CaliforniaWeedBlog} : Thats true, we didn't even mention that, in the US you can practically get a new 6s as a carrier deal.", '>>{j0phus} : They stopped the counting. Look at the results after the recount was completed. *That* is not in the decision.', '>>{batsofburden} : Purge could happen, just replace everyone with yes-men.', '>>{Jennica} : It seems like an impossible feat for the people of Kentucky to vote him out. His streak is pretty remarkable, unfortunately.', ">>{enragedbreakfast} : Yeah I'd imagine in the USits probably even cheaper.", '>>{nesoom} : Pisses me of when fucking Cruz reads god damn Dr.Sues but this happens. What pieces of pathetic spineless shit.', '>>{Cycleoflife} : That makes perfect sense, if you take the time to read it.', '>>{Hnetu} : Apologies, I was on my phone and I\'m going to blame that. I\'ll explain it again, slowly. Sessions used his power of office in Alabama to push back against black voters. Warren read a letter written about this *actual thing that happened* during the hearings. McConnell said that reading about an *actual thing that happened* classifies as an \'insult.\' The point I was making is that the ability to judge something as \'insulting\' is subjective, and republicans can claim that anything stated against them qualifies in their eyes as an insult and therefore cannot be mentioned/must be stricken from the record/is cause for silencing a Senator who opposes. Hence: If I get to decide what\'s insulting to me, then I can decide anything negative is an insult. Even if it was a thing that actually happened in my life. If I kick a dog and you say "dude, you kicked a dog," I could say "That\'s insulting to my character" and dismiss it as irrelevant. I could silence your observation by saying "that\'s an insult" and if I, hypothetically, did that to anything you said regardless of what you say, then you (or in this case, Senator Warren) would be silenced by the people (McConnell) who have my (Sessions) back.', '>>{LegioVIFerrata} : It does if districts are drawn by an algorithm.', '>>{Footwarrior} : Citizen initiatives in California and Arizona took drawing of districts away from the legislature and gave it to an independent board.', ">>{Anaron} : I'd get the 7. Even if the next iPhone is redesigned, it won't take away from using the 7 for the better part of a year. The 32GB version doesn't use lower quality internal storage. It's slower because it uses less channels. If write speeds are a concern, then go for the 128GB version. I didn't need the extra storage and I don't mind waiting a few extra seconds to install an app. I put the money I saved there towards AppleCare+.", ">>{LysergicOracle} : Fuck, I want to see that alternate timeline so badly. I don't know if things would be drastically different now, but I have to believe they'd be a little better.", ">>{CMCScootaloo} : First, I'd recommend not buying the lowest capacity available and you should also check out the SE if you wanna save a bit of money Now, out of those two, I'd say go for the 7 if you have the cash. The extra features seem worth it for me, but then again, i haven't tried either so take this with a grain of salt", ">>{thats-rickdiculous} : What kind of world are we living in where reading MLK's widow's words on the Senate floor gets you thrown out of the room.", ">>{Lunarbaby21} : If you don't care about the camera, I would go for the 6s.", ">>{FallenLeafDemon} : The Constitution demands that states have a republican form of government, so I'd argue that politicians choosing their voters isn't republican thus isn't constitutional.", ">>{adamsak} : If you're going to buy a phone that you want to last at least a couple years before you think about replacing it, I'd go for the 7, and then keep it a while. However, if you think you're going to want next year's phone even more because of a radical re-design, you may want to go even lower than the 6s, knowing that this is more of a temporary phone that just needs to last you ten months until the next phone.", '>>{fluffykerfuffle1} : in real life we run into this when people say to us "why are you shaming me?"', ">>{LoganLinthicum} : Real life isn't at all like a confirmation hearing.", ">>{GuyInAChair} : Headline: President says the sky is green. President: Yes I said the sky is green. That's fake news the sky is obviously blue.", ">>{NAmember81} : If the FBI talked to Mr. Donny J. Dipshit's administration, there's probably a team of lawyers that are going to take care of this with epic tactics of damage control. A scapegoat or two will go down, but otherwise nothing a pardon can't take care of. Just being devil's advocate.", '>>{Circumin} : Oh honey, America has always been like this. We thought it was getting better, but I guess not.', '>>{LoganLinthicum} : The same world in which it is an open secret that the FBI killed MLKjr and people just keep going to work.', ">>{ObiLaws} : > betrays the public's trust Their anger and their lust for power have already done that.", '>>{ready-ignite} : It will be less than 16 years before crowds chant this at Bernie Sanders rallies. That is the unfortunate shadow the DNC impartiality casts over the Clinton campaign. Should have been clean.', ">>{FallenLeafDemon} : That would screw Democrats because they self-pack into cities. Let's just ditch first-past-the-post and single-member districts and move to mixed-member proportional representation.", '>>{stickmanDave} : Apparently house republicans have never heard of the [Streisand effect.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect) Good on them for turning this from a quick-to-be-forgotten late night speech into a national news story!', ">>{SocialBrushStroke} : > there's probably a team of lawyers that are going to take care of this with epic tactics of damage control. His own lawyer has told 4 different stories about his involvement. $20 bucks says they hire mob lawyers from NYC & the lawyers get chewed up and spit out by the dem senators, who are also lawyers. >A scapegoat or two will go down, but otherwise nothing a pardon can't take care of. >>‘He will die in jail’: Intelligence community ready to ‘go nuclear’ on Trump, senior source says http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/he-will-die-in-jail-intelligence-community-ready-to-go-nuclear-on-trump-senior-source-says/", ">>{Sir_packsalot} : We'll just wait for more comedians to make fun, make us laugh on our way to work, on our way to the bank. Wait until the WH silences them, member when Trump sat on the little desk...", '>>{pseudolocus} : Cohen IS (or was) a mob lawyer, so yep.', '>>{FallenLeafDemon} : It could be enacted by ballot initiative in some states.', '>>{Lorieoflauderdale} : They did have the President elects brother in charge of the state- and what was the name of the shifty lady in charge of the election count?', '>>{volares} : They self pack into cities no. being packed into a city makes you more aware of the problems that other people who exist have instead of only caring about some podunk town that will never equate to anything.', '>>{4D_MemeKing} : The SCOTUS should recuse themselves of this and any further topic. They are not legitimate. Every word they write from here on out will be fraudulent', '>>{diablofreak} : Will he hear the chants at the young age of 91? Edit: Oh wait less than 16 years, never mind me', ">>{intravenus_de_milo} : > SCOTUS didn't steal it. It had *zero* constitutional mechanism to interfere. It will go down in history as one of the most amazing judicial overreaches of all time.", '>>{leper_leopard} : If only bitch McConnell had the same chutzpah to silence his fellow GOP slime bags when they spout bullshit.', '>>{jt121} : Depends on who programs the algorithm. If a partisan programs the algorithm, then likeliness of the algorithm setting up partisan lines are going to be significantly higher. It needs to be based on input from a committee that has equal representation from all parties of importance (independent, Republican, and Democrat), to really give everyone a fair shot.', '>>{Cyyyyk} : Apparently you are allowed to editorialize the title on /r/politics as long as it advances the correct narrative. It seems like they should update the submission guidelines to reflect this and avoid confusion.', ">>{pseudolocus} : I think he'll crack, his staff /handlers keeping him away from a lot of the news headlines will quit, and then Bannon will try and crack down more.", ">>{karl4319} : Interesting argument. I'd go with the 14th amendment though.", ">>{Percival_Snugglebutt} : The Tea Party is a strange beast as know it. It is hard to tell what would have happened. It is the love child of several groups: * The Taxed Enough Already Party - Essentially Occupy's estranged twin. A more libertarian based protest against the housing collapse and bank bailouts. * Koch Brothers astroturfing - They had spent years, decades trying to create a Tea Party like movement * Fox/GOP spin - When the TEAP was gaining speed Fox sent out at least four buses with popular hosts to cover the events and sub-groups they wanted to give exposure too. * Beckian Patriots - People who went a Glenn Beck route, and started treated the Founding Fathers like they were some sort of holy saints, and that the country was having a spiritual crisis. If the economic crash after 9/11 hadn't happened and the Housing Crisis at least dampened... we may not have had the Tea Party. The first and last on that list were direct responses to the Great Recession, but just from different mindsets. Without the TEAP then Fox, the Kochs, and the GOP had no mass movement to co-opt.", '>>{Percival_Snugglebutt} : It was such an overreach that the SCOTUS even stated their decision then should not be used for precedent. They knew what they were doing.', ">>{pseudolocus} : He actually confirmed some of the leaks! Not just behavior, but in tweets, and for example, recent statements confirming Priebus met with the FBI and the leaks are very very bad news (oops we accidentally confirmed things). Which is kind of amusing until you remember it's also a horrifying state of the govt.", ">>{Hnetu} : I mean, that's not wrong. Claiming things are 'attacks' is a simple (and usually effective) way of shutting down someone with an opposite viewpoint. It puts them on the defensive, where they have to switch to say they're not attacking/insulting/whatever, and then while their guard is down there's a chance to counter-attack. It's either a 'tu quoque,' accusing the accuser of insults and deflecting from having to answer/own the accusations. Or a 'no true scotsman,' stating that 'no true Senator would insult another Senator' and thus the 'insulting' Senator wouldn't be allowed to speak.", '>>{Bronk0z} : Every Democrat should start reading the letter. Fuck em', '>>{FiftyDegreeDay} : Well it was either they interfere, or allow Florida to use different standards per precinct and potentially take months to decide who the President is. The system isnt set up for drawn out elections, only drawn out campaigns so the American people and the world needs to know as soon as possible, and Florida fucked it up. And Marbury vs. Madison gave it that overreach mechanism. Highest power in these lands', '>>{lolwork1} : Which part do you object to? "Silences" seems to be the only language in the title that could convey opinion. "Silence" is defined as "to prevent or prohibit from speaking", which is what happened.', '>>{OpinionKid} : It\'s Kentucky, best case scenario is he\'s replaced by an "establishment" Democrat. Progressive toppling McConnell is impossible imho.', ">>{RupertTheRipper} : Cleaner air. Probably still a 9/11. Recession makes him a one termer? Probably no Iraq War. Marriage lasts longer? McCain wins in '04. No Sarah Palin. Then my crystal ball grows hazy...", '>>{ParentPostLacksWang} : In real life you can respond "I\'m not trying to shame you. If you feel ashamed, that\'s on you." Whereas in this hearing in the senate, Warren is hit with effectively an instant legal gag order. It\'s worlds apart.', '>>{karl4319} : No, Redistricting should be done by open source algorithms based only on population size. And it should be conducted by a bi-partisan committee to change anything after the initial drawing. Edit: This guy [already did this](http://bdistricting.com/2010/)', ">>{nutellaeater} : That is the problem that this man and most of his supports can't fucking see or don't wanna see it. That the tables can always turn!", '>>{Adam_df} : > Sessions used his power of office in Alabama to push back against black voters. No. His office prosecuted 3 or 4 people. Saying that he "pushed back against black voters," and moreover saying he did so because he did so to "chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens" isn\'t fact but characterization, and certainly characterization that attacks his motives.', '>>{fluffykerfuffle1} : OK well I was just trying to relate to the situation. The bottom line for me here is that people are using "The Law" to undermine democracy.', ">>{pzerr} : Why won't you respond to anything? I mean, fuck, even Trump has tweeted some are true. What fucking more evidence do you need?", ">>{4D_MemeKing} : Because of congresses refusal to consider a democratic president's nominee. If only one party is permitted to participate in the process the legitimacy is gone. One leg of the three legged stool is broke.", '>>{UnhWut} : Lol. Are neonazis trying to change the word dog whistle too now?', ">>{CptYossarian} : Sure but right now that actually works in our favour. It's 4-4 instead of 5-4 Conservative.", '>>{ParentPostLacksWang} : Yep, that\'s definitely what\'s happening. One of the most fundamental steps for installing a totalitarian state is purging those who dissent from the "vision", and silencing those who cannot be easily purged.', ">>{4D_MemeKing} : It doesn't matter. It's not a legitimate institution and it should not be using their power to do anything.", ">>{NemWan} : Constitutionally districts must be contiguous and divided equally by population. Gerrymandering is possible when they're not also required to be as compact as possible or to respect logical geographic or political boundaries. A dense city population will be a separate and geographically smaller district than a rural population's district, but they will have equal population and representation. Rural districts will tend to be more homogenous and urban districts — that are not deliberately designed to group Democrats together into a supermajority in one district so there can be more neighboring Republican-majority districts — will tend to be more diverse. Without gerrymandering, urbanization would tend to favor the party that best represents urban diversity long term.", ">>{Ohmygorb} : They're gonna be cool with it. Cause they're assholes.", '>>{tyler56721} : You can design a partisan algorithm. You could have an algorithm do the best possible gerrymandering.', '>>{table_fireplace} : We do this in Canada. It works quite well.', ">>{Peginnola} : This looks great, but isn't the fear/problem that if the lines are based solely on population that minorities may not have a voice at all?", '>>{GonnaVote2} : Why is it ok to make districts based on building a black Caucasus in congress but not ok to break that up?', ">>{GonnaVote2} : without racial gerrymanding you lose the black caucus. The Democrats created large black voting blocks (93% democrats) to allow for Black congressmen to get elected.. But if the republicans try to break this up...it's racist...or partisan... But when the Dems made it...well that was ok", '>>{NemWan} : It\'s a good point to bring up, though my response would be to qualify my "indefensible" comment with unreserved support for historical affirmative action. It is a fact, for example, that the state with the highest percentage black population (Mississippi, with 37%) has never elected a black candidate to statewide office since Reconstruction, and in South Carolina (30% black), there were no black elected officials at any level after Reconstruction and until 1970, after the Voting Rights Act required districts to be drawn such that there would be black representation in otherwise all-white government. Whites in areas which had historically institutionalized white supremacy and discrimination against blacks simply would not elect blacks to office unless the percentage of black voters is adjusted high enough to overwhelm racial resistance in the electorate.', ">>{10dollarbagel} : Well being a Democrat is not a protected class. I'm not defending it, but they're miles apart legally. It's a smart case to make, but leaves out that the obvious implications of a 95% white party. For Republicans, disenfranchising voting populations that don't support them often means suppressing minority voters. Interestingly the case the SCOTUS is hearing comes from North Carolina which recently successfully argued the inextricable relationship between race and party affiliation at least within their state. Can't wait to see the arguments next week!", ">>{10dollarbagel} : But if you take non-politicians and start having them create and implement policy in redistricting, don't they become you know, politicians?", ">>{laxboy119} : The fear isn't for minorities. The fear is that those on ranches are not heard. It would be like saying ok these 4 small towns get to vote along side NYC. Those 4 small towns will never be heard.", '>>{whatnowdog} : Some people can just crunch numbers. Anything you do is going to help and hurt individual politicians or party. I live in NC and in statewide votes the Republicans may have a slight edge but either party may win a race. The governors race has not been settled but the difference in the race is 10,200 votes with the Democrat ahead of the Republican Governor. The Republicans won the Senate race and Trump won. If the race is in a district the deck is stacked for the Republicans. The House Congressional delegation have 10 Republicans and 3 Democrats. The State House and Senate have veto proof majorities. Almost all seats are now safe seats and that makes for bad government because the politician does not have to care about the 40% of the votes that belong to the other party.', '>>{karl4319} : You mean like gerrymandering does now? Yes, a few areas would have that problem, but in the short term, I highly doubt it would effect anything significantly. In the long term, a lot of issues that are based on minority votes right now (poorer areas vs richer ones, the problems with race and laws, religious intolerance, etc) would largely be fixed. One of the best side effect of democracy is that when push comes to shove, most people are willing to compromise to get the job done. Like how most registered republicans voted for Trump even if they hated him, they believed that the people *around* him and in congress will push their views. The end result of ending gerrymandering this way could very well be a more united country. Of course, for this to work properly, several other steps have to be taken as well. Significantly expand the House so it and the EC more accurately populations (1 representative per 350,000 people). There would need to be a *National* voter registration system that automatically registers every voter. There would have to be a law passed that decrees a minimal amount of polling places as well as their locations to make sure every American has the chance to vote. In the same vein, Election days need to be holidays, as well as completely redoing the primary process. Lastly, prisoners and felons should not lose their right to vote.', ">>{JinxFallen} : You mean your idea is in the minority? Oh man we can't have that", ">>{10dollarbagel} : You may have missed my point. I was being pedantic. By definition whoever crafts the policy is going to become a politician if they aren't one already.", ">>{laxboy119} : Well here is the thing. Yes the people in the city who make up most of the population should have a decent amount of control BUT You can't just ignore the needs of a very different type of people, such as those out in rural areas. What districting needs to do is split in a way where the rural areas still have enough weight to have influence, not control but influence", ">>{dam072000} : The rationality used in your comment is just as easily and has been applied to race. Doesn't that make you feel gross?", '>>{dam072000} : Congress could allow multimember proportional districts. The same law that says there are 435 members of the house also says that they have to be elected in single member districts.', ">>{dam072000} : Not every state has initiatives and states aren't required to enforce initiatives even if they do have them.", '>>{robotzor} : How it is now is that "your city might be liberal, so let\'s carve up chunks of it and extend them way out into the boonies so we get as many of those small towns voting red as possible to level it out instead of the city voting as one cohesive unit" and it does really interesting things to expectation when elections come up.', ">>{GiantNinerWarrior} : Yup, and [a district court in Wisconsin just struct down a partisan gerrymander there and endorsed a statistical formula for determining an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/23/wisconsins-gerrymander-being-struck-down-should-scare-republicans-nationwide/?utm_term=.8399c273c146), in a case that will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court: > Numerous times since the civil rights era, courts have struck down how partisan state legislatures set up legislative districts on the grounds that those decisions diminished the political power of racial minorities. But courts have been far less likely to intervene in cases where states organized voting districts to boost one party, preferring to not get involved in explicitly political matters. >This was why the decision Monday by the federal District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin was so significant. The court found that the Republican-held legislature had intentionally manipulated district lines to favor Republican candidates. And that manipulation was so extreme, it found, that it violated the “one person, one vote” principle and the Democratic voters’ rights to fair representation required by the Constitution's promises of equal protection.", '>>{GiantNinerWarrior} : [May also be illegal soon.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/23/wisconsins-gerrymander-being-struck-down-should-scare-republicans-nationwide/?utm_term=.8399c273c146)', ">>{GiantNinerWarrior} : The Voting Rights Act requires that minority voting strength not be diluted via racial gerrymandering, a widespread practice throughout the South during the 100 years between emancipation and the VRA's passage in 1965, often resulting in states with high minority populations not having a *single* minority state legislative or congressional representative. One interesting result of this is that Republicans and black Democratic politicians in the South have often joined together in gerrymandering to create even safer black districts while diluting Democratic voting strength in surrounding districts by packing as many black and Democratic voters into certain districts, thus giving Republicans control of more districts as a whole.", ">>{GiantNinerWarrior} : > Republicans abused the hell out of this Yup, but so have Democrats in states in which they control the state legislature (e.g. Illinois). Political gerrymandering is anti-democratic whichever party is doing it, and I am hopeful that the Supreme Court will adopt a neutral statistical measure like the court in Wisconsin just did, and we can be rid of partisan gerrymandering nationwide. > I feel as though the Supreme Court feels goaded into making some moves before Trump's presidency makes some unprecedentally silly and likely unconstitutional moves. Eh, these cases take years to go through the courts, there's really not a whole lot the Supreme Court can do to make it go faster. They will take the cases as they come up to them on appeal, and hopefully over the long run they will solve some of these problems.", '>>{TheOfficialJoeBiden} : No that would be insane. If we did that, minority votes might actually count. /s', '>>{goteamnick} : Do you have any particular issues with the California or Arizona maps? Or are you just being ignorantly cynical?', '>>{tuseroni} : >The justices have been more forgiving of maps based on partisan advantage but..WHY?', '>>{mclumber1} : Racial gerrymandering is actually pretty much required by the civil rights act.', ">>{NemWan} : Yes, I forgot and I didn't mean to be against that. https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5g9rzu/supreme_court_hears_cases_about_use_of_race_in/dar0k4y/", ">>{Silospek} : I can't imagine one of the gerrymandered states actually allowing that to happen. They'd probably just introduce a bill to gut it the second they got a chance. I feel like the solution can't be left to the states, unfortunately gerrymandering works so that ain't happening either. The whole point is to elect legislators that represent the public. We're so fucking far from that now and gerrymandering is a big part of why.", ">>{LCDJosh} : I'm going to go ahead and predict the outcome on this; 4-4."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Boombollie} : Mitch McConnell Silences Elizabeth Warren on the Senate Floor, preventing her from continuing to read aloud from a letter written by Coretta Scott King in 1986 to oppose the nomination of Jeff Sessions to a federal judgeship.', ">>{fluffykerfuffle1} : this is the part of the rule 19 that they used against warren in the Senate hearing >2. No Senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator. which sounds to me like the hearing cannot hear anything against this guy because he's a senator ....how can this be? it seems logical to me therefore no senator can be nominated for a cabinet position because their qualifications cannot be debated in the Senate.", ">>{youngthugstan} : This is fucking disgusting...horrible to say, but I won't sweat the day that McConnell is gone, either by the vote or by old age.", '>>{MeinDrumpf} : They timed it so that he could vote for DeCunt today. Trumpublicans. Swampy AF.', ">>{oneinfinitecreator} : I think it's more of a strategy to not air out the dirty laundry of the Senate on record. If somebody has a proper complaint, i'm sure there are legal channels to take action with, but using 'offenses' against each other in debate just betrays the public's trust. In fairness to the Republicans, I'm not sure a character assessment from 30 years ago is very relevant to today. It's not an honest way to judge somebody, so I'm not necessarily totally in disagreement. I think Warren could have actually spoke to the here and now instead of dragging some old letter into it... she usually seems more on the ball than the other senators but ended up getting railroaded.", '>>{Vavavoom180} : > Trumpublicans This is how I will be referring to them from now on. We need to forever tie Trump to these spineless elected officials and watch them sink when his cult of personality fails.', ">>{Adam_df} : You're saying Democrats don't know how to criticize positions without personally insulting the person?", '>>{Pedophilecabinet} : I absolutely will start using that. Thank you u/MeinDrumpf', ">>{Hnetu} : What qualifies as insulting then? Because apparently to republicans, using their own words in context can be an insult. If I get to decide what's insulting to me, I can decide that anything negative is an insult. And if you're silenced for insulting, I could effectively make you unable to say anything just by claiming it's an insult to my character.", ">>{TravelKats} : I'd prefer he be voted out of office for the most liberal dem possible....melt that snowflake.", '>>{Jennica} : It seems like an impossible feat for the people of Kentucky to vote him out. His streak is pretty remarkable, unfortunately.', '>>{nesoom} : Pisses me of when fucking Cruz reads god damn Dr.Sues but this happens. What pieces of pathetic spineless shit.', '>>{Cycleoflife} : That makes perfect sense, if you take the time to read it.', '>>{Hnetu} : Apologies, I was on my phone and I\'m going to blame that. I\'ll explain it again, slowly. Sessions used his power of office in Alabama to push back against black voters. Warren read a letter written about this *actual thing that happened* during the hearings. McConnell said that reading about an *actual thing that happened* classifies as an \'insult.\' The point I was making is that the ability to judge something as \'insulting\' is subjective, and republicans can claim that anything stated against them qualifies in their eyes as an insult and therefore cannot be mentioned/must be stricken from the record/is cause for silencing a Senator who opposes. Hence: If I get to decide what\'s insulting to me, then I can decide anything negative is an insult. Even if it was a thing that actually happened in my life. If I kick a dog and you say "dude, you kicked a dog," I could say "That\'s insulting to my character" and dismiss it as irrelevant. I could silence your observation by saying "that\'s an insult" and if I, hypothetically, did that to anything you said regardless of what you say, then you (or in this case, Senator Warren) would be silenced by the people (McConnell) who have my (Sessions) back.', ">>{thats-rickdiculous} : What kind of world are we living in where reading MLK's widow's words on the Senate floor gets you thrown out of the room.", '>>{fluffykerfuffle1} : in real life we run into this when people say to us "why are you shaming me?"', ">>{LoganLinthicum} : Real life isn't at all like a confirmation hearing.", '>>{Circumin} : Oh honey, America has always been like this. We thought it was getting better, but I guess not.', '>>{LoganLinthicum} : The same world in which it is an open secret that the FBI killed MLKjr and people just keep going to work.', ">>{ObiLaws} : > betrays the public's trust Their anger and their lust for power have already done that.", '>>{stickmanDave} : Apparently house republicans have never heard of the [Streisand effect.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect) Good on them for turning this from a quick-to-be-forgotten late night speech into a national news story!', ">>{Sir_packsalot} : We'll just wait for more comedians to make fun, make us laugh on our way to work, on our way to the bank. Wait until the WH silences them, member when Trump sat on the little desk...", '>>{leper_leopard} : If only bitch McConnell had the same chutzpah to silence his fellow GOP slime bags when they spout bullshit.', '>>{Cyyyyk} : Apparently you are allowed to editorialize the title on /r/politics as long as it advances the correct narrative. It seems like they should update the submission guidelines to reflect this and avoid confusion.', ">>{Hnetu} : I mean, that's not wrong. Claiming things are 'attacks' is a simple (and usually effective) way of shutting down someone with an opposite viewpoint. It puts them on the defensive, where they have to switch to say they're not attacking/insulting/whatever, and then while their guard is down there's a chance to counter-attack. It's either a 'tu quoque,' accusing the accuser of insults and deflecting from having to answer/own the accusations. Or a 'no true scotsman,' stating that 'no true Senator would insult another Senator' and thus the 'insulting' Senator wouldn't be allowed to speak.", '>>{Bronk0z} : Every Democrat should start reading the letter. Fuck em', '>>{lolwork1} : Which part do you object to? "Silences" seems to be the only language in the title that could convey opinion. "Silence" is defined as "to prevent or prohibit from speaking", which is what happened.', '>>{OpinionKid} : It\'s Kentucky, best case scenario is he\'s replaced by an "establishment" Democrat. Progressive toppling McConnell is impossible imho.', '>>{ParentPostLacksWang} : In real life you can respond "I\'m not trying to shame you. If you feel ashamed, that\'s on you." Whereas in this hearing in the senate, Warren is hit with effectively an instant legal gag order. It\'s worlds apart.', '>>{Adam_df} : > Sessions used his power of office in Alabama to push back against black voters. No. His office prosecuted 3 or 4 people. Saying that he "pushed back against black voters," and moreover saying he did so because he did so to "chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens" isn\'t fact but characterization, and certainly characterization that attacks his motives.', '>>{fluffykerfuffle1} : OK well I was just trying to relate to the situation. The bottom line for me here is that people are using "The Law" to undermine democracy.', '>>{ParentPostLacksWang} : Yep, that\'s definitely what\'s happening. One of the most fundamental steps for installing a totalitarian state is purging those who dissent from the "vision", and silencing those who cannot be easily purged.'], ['>>{ChestyLaRue83} : Wtf did he think was gonna happen when he stood in front of a camera talking to millions of people asking Russia to find 33,000 emails. Reap what you sow mother fucker.', ">>{aubonpaine} : Because those in the Trump administration know they're on a sinking ship, and those in the federal bureaucracy know that something's rotten. People take an oath to defend and uphold the constitution, not the so-called president.", '>>{ozric101} : They wont stop because there are no actual leaks the are simply rumors. It is all a fabrication of the Fake News Media. They need clicks and dog whistles for their small pack of rabid liberal readers.', ">>{justiceslade} : Everything trump does that I don't approve of is Obama's fault!", '>>{basket_of_adorables} : Well when you never had a source in the first place your "leaks" can continue so long as you don\'t wear your keyboard out typing "sources say."', ">>{aubonpaine} : Trump says they're leaks. So is Trump lying?", '>>{GoldenShowerDonnie} : Is it because Donnie is a piece of shit traitor?', ">>{FriesWithThat} : He knows what's in the pipe and is preparing his base to be able to deny the truth of anything published or broadcast in a media outlet. Get them to buy-in now cheap on the easily disprovable stuff like Sweden is a crime-ridden hell-hole, and it'll be so much easier for the core to swallow whole as conspiracy and fake once complicated facts exposing Wikileak drop coordination and incriminating Trump organization financials start getting exposed.", '>>{RonaldDumbsfield} : Tune in to Russia Today for latest news comrades!', ">>{mburke6} : He will either learn to live with the leaks and accept he'll never have 100% loyalty, or there will be a purge.", ">>{HolgerDane} : Let's say it ~~as~~ is all made up. But then why fire Flynn?", ">>{GuyInAChair} : > It is all a fabrication of the Fake News Media I've never got an answer to this question. If the leaks have been confirmed to be factually correct by the President himself, how can they be *fake news*? Sometimes I feel like I'm missing something obvious, since the people who disagree with me are so insistent that they're right. However, something that is confirmed to be factually correct can not by definition be fake.", '>>{sleepy_batman1776} : >Ultimately, though, Trump will have to accept that he does not—and cannot have—total control and total allegiance. “How do you cope with leaks?” President Reagan was once asked. “I’ve been told you don’t,” he replied, having already learned a lesson that Trump will soon internalize. “Everybody who has been around here for a while tells me it is just the nature of the place.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPlQpGeTbIE', ">>{DuPage-on-DuSable} : Trump isn't even denying the leaks. He's focusing on how the leaks are illegal. There's a big distinction", '>>{somekindofrabbit} : > If the leaks have been confirmed to be factually correct by the President himself, how can they be fake news Were you not listening to Dear Leader? The leaks are real. The _news_ is fake. The lügenpresse is fakefully reporting on real things.', '>>{batsofburden} : Purge could happen, just replace everyone with yes-men.', ">>{GuyInAChair} : Headline: President says the sky is green. President: Yes I said the sky is green. That's fake news the sky is obviously blue.", ">>{NAmember81} : If the FBI talked to Mr. Donny J. Dipshit's administration, there's probably a team of lawyers that are going to take care of this with epic tactics of damage control. A scapegoat or two will go down, but otherwise nothing a pardon can't take care of. Just being devil's advocate.", ">>{SocialBrushStroke} : > there's probably a team of lawyers that are going to take care of this with epic tactics of damage control. His own lawyer has told 4 different stories about his involvement. $20 bucks says they hire mob lawyers from NYC & the lawyers get chewed up and spit out by the dem senators, who are also lawyers. >A scapegoat or two will go down, but otherwise nothing a pardon can't take care of. >>‘He will die in jail’: Intelligence community ready to ‘go nuclear’ on Trump, senior source says http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/he-will-die-in-jail-intelligence-community-ready-to-go-nuclear-on-trump-senior-source-says/", '>>{pseudolocus} : Cohen IS (or was) a mob lawyer, so yep.', ">>{pseudolocus} : I think he'll crack, his staff /handlers keeping him away from a lot of the news headlines will quit, and then Bannon will try and crack down more.", ">>{pseudolocus} : He actually confirmed some of the leaks! Not just behavior, but in tweets, and for example, recent statements confirming Priebus met with the FBI and the leaks are very very bad news (oops we accidentally confirmed things). Which is kind of amusing until you remember it's also a horrifying state of the govt.", ">>{nutellaeater} : That is the problem that this man and most of his supports can't fucking see or don't wanna see it. That the tables can always turn!", ">>{pzerr} : Why won't you respond to anything? I mean, fuck, even Trump has tweeted some are true. What fucking more evidence do you need?", '>>{UnhWut} : Lol. Are neonazis trying to change the word dog whistle too now?'], [">>{ninbushido} : Crowd chants 'you won' during Al Gore speech at Clinton rally in Fla.", '>>{FiftyDegreeDay} : Maybe they shouldve chanted "sorry for not poking through the ballot all the way". Damnit Florida, always fucking it up for the rest of us', '>>{FilsDeLiberte} : He did win. The election was stolen by the Supreme Court.', '>>{leCapitaineEvident} : If the crowd is talking about the 2000 election, they are incorrect.', '>>{cynicallad} : Whenever someone says "you are the most beautiful man (or woman) in the world" they are invariably incorrect, but most people seem to know what they mean anyway.', '>>{FiftyDegreeDay} : Without a doubt, but come on Florida. Between their shitty drivers and old people coming to North Carolina every year and causing mass frustration, and them solely letting Bush get the presidency, I will never respect that state.', ">>{FiftyDegreeDay} : SCOTUS didn't steal it. Floridas mismanagement did. You can't count ballots and then every precinct ends up having different standards on what is a vote or ineligible and SCOTUS as shitty as it was made a judgement call", '>>{j0phus} : No. SCOTUS appointed a President. *That happened.* Gore won by every single measure.', '>>{FiftyDegreeDay} : Read Gore V. Bush. They didnt just randomly appoint him', '>>{j0phus} : They stopped the counting. Look at the results after the recount was completed. *That* is not in the decision.', ">>{LysergicOracle} : Fuck, I want to see that alternate timeline so badly. I don't know if things would be drastically different now, but I have to believe they'd be a little better.", '>>{ready-ignite} : It will be less than 16 years before crowds chant this at Bernie Sanders rallies. That is the unfortunate shadow the DNC impartiality casts over the Clinton campaign. Should have been clean.', '>>{Lorieoflauderdale} : They did have the President elects brother in charge of the state- and what was the name of the shifty lady in charge of the election count?', '>>{diablofreak} : Will he hear the chants at the young age of 91? Edit: Oh wait less than 16 years, never mind me', ">>{intravenus_de_milo} : > SCOTUS didn't steal it. It had *zero* constitutional mechanism to interfere. It will go down in history as one of the most amazing judicial overreaches of all time.", ">>{Percival_Snugglebutt} : The Tea Party is a strange beast as know it. It is hard to tell what would have happened. It is the love child of several groups: * The Taxed Enough Already Party - Essentially Occupy's estranged twin. A more libertarian based protest against the housing collapse and bank bailouts. * Koch Brothers astroturfing - They had spent years, decades trying to create a Tea Party like movement * Fox/GOP spin - When the TEAP was gaining speed Fox sent out at least four buses with popular hosts to cover the events and sub-groups they wanted to give exposure too. * Beckian Patriots - People who went a Glenn Beck route, and started treated the Founding Fathers like they were some sort of holy saints, and that the country was having a spiritual crisis. If the economic crash after 9/11 hadn't happened and the Housing Crisis at least dampened... we may not have had the Tea Party. The first and last on that list were direct responses to the Great Recession, but just from different mindsets. Without the TEAP then Fox, the Kochs, and the GOP had no mass movement to co-opt.", '>>{Percival_Snugglebutt} : It was such an overreach that the SCOTUS even stated their decision then should not be used for precedent. They knew what they were doing.', '>>{FiftyDegreeDay} : Well it was either they interfere, or allow Florida to use different standards per precinct and potentially take months to decide who the President is. The system isnt set up for drawn out elections, only drawn out campaigns so the American people and the world needs to know as soon as possible, and Florida fucked it up. And Marbury vs. Madison gave it that overreach mechanism. Highest power in these lands', ">>{RupertTheRipper} : Cleaner air. Probably still a 9/11. Recession makes him a one termer? Probably no Iraq War. Marriage lasts longer? McCain wins in '04. No Sarah Palin. Then my crystal ball grows hazy..."], ['>>{Alectr0} : Want to switch to iOS. Which iPhone should I get?', '>>{BWA_Dallas} : I love my 7, I highly recommend it.', ">>{CaliforniaWeedBlog} : 6S, I just don't think there is enough on the 7 to justify the higher cost. Apple products are good for a few years so a 6s is future proof for the forseable future. Also you do bring a good point with that next iPhone. Its supposed to be dank af and if thats the case it makes sense to spend less now (6S).", ">>{enragedbreakfast} : If you can get a deal it's worth it. I got mine for $0 on Rogers in Canada, and got a $100 bill credit for switching from my old carrier. Otherwise yeah, 6S is probably a better deal.", ">>{m3n0kn0w} : If you normally keep your phones for a few years, I would recommend the 7 because of the larger space and newer components. Those will age better than the 6s. However, if you upgrade rather quickly, the 6s is a great phone and you won't notice any difference in usability.", ">>{CaliforniaWeedBlog} : Thats true, we didn't even mention that, in the US you can practically get a new 6s as a carrier deal.", ">>{enragedbreakfast} : Yeah I'd imagine in the USits probably even cheaper.", ">>{Anaron} : I'd get the 7. Even if the next iPhone is redesigned, it won't take away from using the 7 for the better part of a year. The 32GB version doesn't use lower quality internal storage. It's slower because it uses less channels. If write speeds are a concern, then go for the 128GB version. I didn't need the extra storage and I don't mind waiting a few extra seconds to install an app. I put the money I saved there towards AppleCare+.", ">>{CMCScootaloo} : First, I'd recommend not buying the lowest capacity available and you should also check out the SE if you wanna save a bit of money Now, out of those two, I'd say go for the 7 if you have the cash. The extra features seem worth it for me, but then again, i haven't tried either so take this with a grain of salt", ">>{Lunarbaby21} : If you don't care about the camera, I would go for the 6s.", ">>{adamsak} : If you're going to buy a phone that you want to last at least a couple years before you think about replacing it, I'd go for the 7, and then keep it a while. However, if you think you're going to want next year's phone even more because of a radical re-design, you may want to go even lower than the 6s, knowing that this is more of a temporary phone that just needs to last you ten months until the next phone."], ['>>{FLTA} : Supreme Court hears cases about use of race in redistricting', ">>{yes_a_new_account} : >The state appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing in part that it made districting decisions based on partisan politics, not race. We weren't trying to disenfranchise blacks, we were trying to disenfranchise democrats. It's all good.", '>>{wwarnout} : *"The state appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing in part that it made districting decisions based on partisan politics, not race."* When a state thinks that making these "...districting decisions based on partisan politics..." is a legitimate excuse for gerrymandering, this shows just how screwed up our elections are. Redistricting should be taken away from the states, and be conducted by a non-partisan federal agency.', '>>{Vicullum} : So, could these cases finally put an end to gerrymandering?', ">>{NemWan} : Racial gerrymandering is indefensible but so is partisan gerrymandering. You can't claim to be voted into office with a mandate to gerrymander in a way that makes it harder for voters to get rid of you.", '>>{FLTA} : No but the Wisconsin one might. The cases discussed in the article are the ones about North Carolina and Virginia.', ">>{The_Throwaway_King} : I agree that it shouldn't be left to the states, but a non-parison federal agency does not exist.", '>>{whatnowdog} : You can find independent non-partisan at the state level. You just keep the politicians out of it as much as possible.', '>>{ghostofpennwast} : Racial gerrymandering works both ways. Too many minorities= racist Too few minorities=racist', ">>{Muspel} : I *think* that the argument is that there's lots of laws about discrimination based on race, but fewer about discrimination based on political positions, thus it may be that dividing up districts based on partisan politics isn't illegal. It *should* be, but the laws that exist aren't always the same as the ones that should.", ">>{Silospek} : Gerrymandering bums me out so much. Any solution requires the people who benefit from gerrymandering to suddenly feel morally inclined to stop it, so what's the solution?", '>>{LegioVIFerrata} : It does if districts are drawn by an algorithm.', '>>{Footwarrior} : Citizen initiatives in California and Arizona took drawing of districts away from the legislature and gave it to an independent board.', ">>{FallenLeafDemon} : The Constitution demands that states have a republican form of government, so I'd argue that politicians choosing their voters isn't republican thus isn't constitutional.", ">>{FallenLeafDemon} : That would screw Democrats because they self-pack into cities. Let's just ditch first-past-the-post and single-member districts and move to mixed-member proportional representation.", '>>{FallenLeafDemon} : It could be enacted by ballot initiative in some states.', '>>{volares} : They self pack into cities no. being packed into a city makes you more aware of the problems that other people who exist have instead of only caring about some podunk town that will never equate to anything.', '>>{4D_MemeKing} : The SCOTUS should recuse themselves of this and any further topic. They are not legitimate. Every word they write from here on out will be fraudulent', '>>{jt121} : Depends on who programs the algorithm. If a partisan programs the algorithm, then likeliness of the algorithm setting up partisan lines are going to be significantly higher. It needs to be based on input from a committee that has equal representation from all parties of importance (independent, Republican, and Democrat), to really give everyone a fair shot.', ">>{karl4319} : Interesting argument. I'd go with the 14th amendment though.", '>>{karl4319} : No, Redistricting should be done by open source algorithms based only on population size. And it should be conducted by a bi-partisan committee to change anything after the initial drawing. Edit: This guy [already did this](http://bdistricting.com/2010/)', ">>{4D_MemeKing} : Because of congresses refusal to consider a democratic president's nominee. If only one party is permitted to participate in the process the legitimacy is gone. One leg of the three legged stool is broke.", ">>{CptYossarian} : Sure but right now that actually works in our favour. It's 4-4 instead of 5-4 Conservative.", ">>{4D_MemeKing} : It doesn't matter. It's not a legitimate institution and it should not be using their power to do anything.", ">>{NemWan} : Constitutionally districts must be contiguous and divided equally by population. Gerrymandering is possible when they're not also required to be as compact as possible or to respect logical geographic or political boundaries. A dense city population will be a separate and geographically smaller district than a rural population's district, but they will have equal population and representation. Rural districts will tend to be more homogenous and urban districts — that are not deliberately designed to group Democrats together into a supermajority in one district so there can be more neighboring Republican-majority districts — will tend to be more diverse. Without gerrymandering, urbanization would tend to favor the party that best represents urban diversity long term.", ">>{Ohmygorb} : They're gonna be cool with it. Cause they're assholes.", '>>{tyler56721} : You can design a partisan algorithm. You could have an algorithm do the best possible gerrymandering.', '>>{table_fireplace} : We do this in Canada. It works quite well.', ">>{Peginnola} : This looks great, but isn't the fear/problem that if the lines are based solely on population that minorities may not have a voice at all?", '>>{GonnaVote2} : Why is it ok to make districts based on building a black Caucasus in congress but not ok to break that up?', ">>{GonnaVote2} : without racial gerrymanding you lose the black caucus. The Democrats created large black voting blocks (93% democrats) to allow for Black congressmen to get elected.. But if the republicans try to break this up...it's racist...or partisan... But when the Dems made it...well that was ok", '>>{NemWan} : It\'s a good point to bring up, though my response would be to qualify my "indefensible" comment with unreserved support for historical affirmative action. It is a fact, for example, that the state with the highest percentage black population (Mississippi, with 37%) has never elected a black candidate to statewide office since Reconstruction, and in South Carolina (30% black), there were no black elected officials at any level after Reconstruction and until 1970, after the Voting Rights Act required districts to be drawn such that there would be black representation in otherwise all-white government. Whites in areas which had historically institutionalized white supremacy and discrimination against blacks simply would not elect blacks to office unless the percentage of black voters is adjusted high enough to overwhelm racial resistance in the electorate.', ">>{10dollarbagel} : Well being a Democrat is not a protected class. I'm not defending it, but they're miles apart legally. It's a smart case to make, but leaves out that the obvious implications of a 95% white party. For Republicans, disenfranchising voting populations that don't support them often means suppressing minority voters. Interestingly the case the SCOTUS is hearing comes from North Carolina which recently successfully argued the inextricable relationship between race and party affiliation at least within their state. Can't wait to see the arguments next week!", ">>{10dollarbagel} : But if you take non-politicians and start having them create and implement policy in redistricting, don't they become you know, politicians?", ">>{laxboy119} : The fear isn't for minorities. The fear is that those on ranches are not heard. It would be like saying ok these 4 small towns get to vote along side NYC. Those 4 small towns will never be heard.", '>>{whatnowdog} : Some people can just crunch numbers. Anything you do is going to help and hurt individual politicians or party. I live in NC and in statewide votes the Republicans may have a slight edge but either party may win a race. The governors race has not been settled but the difference in the race is 10,200 votes with the Democrat ahead of the Republican Governor. The Republicans won the Senate race and Trump won. If the race is in a district the deck is stacked for the Republicans. The House Congressional delegation have 10 Republicans and 3 Democrats. The State House and Senate have veto proof majorities. Almost all seats are now safe seats and that makes for bad government because the politician does not have to care about the 40% of the votes that belong to the other party.', '>>{karl4319} : You mean like gerrymandering does now? Yes, a few areas would have that problem, but in the short term, I highly doubt it would effect anything significantly. In the long term, a lot of issues that are based on minority votes right now (poorer areas vs richer ones, the problems with race and laws, religious intolerance, etc) would largely be fixed. One of the best side effect of democracy is that when push comes to shove, most people are willing to compromise to get the job done. Like how most registered republicans voted for Trump even if they hated him, they believed that the people *around* him and in congress will push their views. The end result of ending gerrymandering this way could very well be a more united country. Of course, for this to work properly, several other steps have to be taken as well. Significantly expand the House so it and the EC more accurately populations (1 representative per 350,000 people). There would need to be a *National* voter registration system that automatically registers every voter. There would have to be a law passed that decrees a minimal amount of polling places as well as their locations to make sure every American has the chance to vote. In the same vein, Election days need to be holidays, as well as completely redoing the primary process. Lastly, prisoners and felons should not lose their right to vote.', ">>{JinxFallen} : You mean your idea is in the minority? Oh man we can't have that", ">>{10dollarbagel} : You may have missed my point. I was being pedantic. By definition whoever crafts the policy is going to become a politician if they aren't one already.", ">>{laxboy119} : Well here is the thing. Yes the people in the city who make up most of the population should have a decent amount of control BUT You can't just ignore the needs of a very different type of people, such as those out in rural areas. What districting needs to do is split in a way where the rural areas still have enough weight to have influence, not control but influence", ">>{dam072000} : The rationality used in your comment is just as easily and has been applied to race. Doesn't that make you feel gross?", '>>{dam072000} : Congress could allow multimember proportional districts. The same law that says there are 435 members of the house also says that they have to be elected in single member districts.', ">>{dam072000} : Not every state has initiatives and states aren't required to enforce initiatives even if they do have them.", '>>{robotzor} : How it is now is that "your city might be liberal, so let\'s carve up chunks of it and extend them way out into the boonies so we get as many of those small towns voting red as possible to level it out instead of the city voting as one cohesive unit" and it does really interesting things to expectation when elections come up.', ">>{GiantNinerWarrior} : Yup, and [a district court in Wisconsin just struct down a partisan gerrymander there and endorsed a statistical formula for determining an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/23/wisconsins-gerrymander-being-struck-down-should-scare-republicans-nationwide/?utm_term=.8399c273c146), in a case that will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court: > Numerous times since the civil rights era, courts have struck down how partisan state legislatures set up legislative districts on the grounds that those decisions diminished the political power of racial minorities. But courts have been far less likely to intervene in cases where states organized voting districts to boost one party, preferring to not get involved in explicitly political matters. >This was why the decision Monday by the federal District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin was so significant. The court found that the Republican-held legislature had intentionally manipulated district lines to favor Republican candidates. And that manipulation was so extreme, it found, that it violated the “one person, one vote” principle and the Democratic voters’ rights to fair representation required by the Constitution's promises of equal protection.", '>>{GiantNinerWarrior} : [May also be illegal soon.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/23/wisconsins-gerrymander-being-struck-down-should-scare-republicans-nationwide/?utm_term=.8399c273c146)', ">>{GiantNinerWarrior} : The Voting Rights Act requires that minority voting strength not be diluted via racial gerrymandering, a widespread practice throughout the South during the 100 years between emancipation and the VRA's passage in 1965, often resulting in states with high minority populations not having a *single* minority state legislative or congressional representative. One interesting result of this is that Republicans and black Democratic politicians in the South have often joined together in gerrymandering to create even safer black districts while diluting Democratic voting strength in surrounding districts by packing as many black and Democratic voters into certain districts, thus giving Republicans control of more districts as a whole.", ">>{GiantNinerWarrior} : > Republicans abused the hell out of this Yup, but so have Democrats in states in which they control the state legislature (e.g. Illinois). Political gerrymandering is anti-democratic whichever party is doing it, and I am hopeful that the Supreme Court will adopt a neutral statistical measure like the court in Wisconsin just did, and we can be rid of partisan gerrymandering nationwide. > I feel as though the Supreme Court feels goaded into making some moves before Trump's presidency makes some unprecedentally silly and likely unconstitutional moves. Eh, these cases take years to go through the courts, there's really not a whole lot the Supreme Court can do to make it go faster. They will take the cases as they come up to them on appeal, and hopefully over the long run they will solve some of these problems.", '>>{TheOfficialJoeBiden} : No that would be insane. If we did that, minority votes might actually count. /s', '>>{goteamnick} : Do you have any particular issues with the California or Arizona maps? Or are you just being ignorantly cynical?', '>>{tuseroni} : >The justices have been more forgiving of maps based on partisan advantage but..WHY?', '>>{mclumber1} : Racial gerrymandering is actually pretty much required by the civil rights act.', ">>{NemWan} : Yes, I forgot and I didn't mean to be against that. https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5g9rzu/supreme_court_hears_cases_about_use_of_race_in/dar0k4y/", ">>{Silospek} : I can't imagine one of the gerrymandered states actually allowing that to happen. They'd probably just introduce a bill to gut it the second they got a chance. I feel like the solution can't be left to the states, unfortunately gerrymandering works so that ain't happening either. The whole point is to elect legislators that represent the public. We're so fucking far from that now and gerrymandering is a big part of why.", ">>{LCDJosh} : I'm going to go ahead and predict the outcome on this; 4-4."]]

classify and reply

[">>{billthomson} : > That system would provide less financial assistance for low-income and older people than ObamaCare, but could give more assistance to younger people and those with somewhat higher incomes. This is the crux of it. People who don't need assistance will pay less, due to the mandate being eliminated and less assistance to the needy.", '>>{Manafort} : Very first post on a minute old account. Interesting.', ">>{Another-Chance} : Trump Cabinet excites his voters: 'We have to trust him'", '>>{aggie1391} : Sec 103, on pages 2-4. Clinics that provide abortions can no longer use federal funds from Medicaid.', ">>{sarge21} : Also, it's a tax credit. So, absolutely no help to poorer people", '>>{Mahale} : It finally dawned on me why Trump is doing so well in Nevada. I imagine the casino owners and all the mob stuff that goes along with it is pumping tons of cash into his campaign and doing local work behind the scenes.', '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : More than 10% of the bill is about Lottery winners...', ">>{KaitRaven} : There's also the fact that Nevada has one of the lowest rates of college education in the country.", '>>{SJUNLIN} : How many of you care to have a phone perfect from scratches and dings?', '>>{LBJ20XX} : In before the talks about intelligence, people getting what they deserve, orange faced baboon, dicks out for the electoral college, blah blah blah blah blah.', '>>{Another-Chance} : *To them, the idea of a defense secretary nicknamed "Mad Dog" is bliss. They rejoice in an energy secretary who once said he would eliminate the Department of Energy. And while some Trump supporters balk at ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson\'s close ties with Russia\'s Vladimir Putin, they say they will trust Trump\'s judgment about his secretary of state nominee.* Yeah, they sure sound all smurt and stuff, huh huh, git r done folks. "We done trust us up some trump cause he lies better n old cooter down at the bar. If ya can\'t trust cooter who can ya trust we always a says!"', '>>{bassististist} : > So, absolutely no help to poorer people Well, TBH, they should have voted Democrat.', '>>{spunkychickpea} : Am I reading this right? (Paraphrasing) Any person who has a gap in coverage will not be subject to a pre-existing condition clause, but will pay a penalty in the form of a surcharge to their premium of 30%. Now, I know my insurance (health insurance employee for over eight years) but legalese still escapes me. So basically, if you can\'t afford insurance for six months because you lost your job, your insurance will now be 30% more expensive, thus making it harder for you to get insurance, thus causing you to wait longer to restore your coverage. "Hey, I know you couldn\'t afford an $800 a month policy six months ago, but we can make it all better by selling you the exact same thing for $1040 a month!" Fuck this bill.', '>>{Another-Chance} : I took care of that for you cause I am nice guy.', ">>{BernardKornblum} : Uhh no. It's being used as a verb.", ">>{shelbys_foot} : I suppose if they were gullible enough to vote for him in the first place, it'll take a while before they're disabused.", ">>{spunkychickpea} : That's the part that infuriates me the most. So if somebody can't afford their coverage now, how does a tax credit in nine months help them get their medication today? Oh, right. They're just gonna have to die. I understand now.", ">>{TheJohnny346} : I currently have a Jet Black iPhone 7 Plus and I keep telling myself to take the case off and use it as is to see it in all its glory. I don't care about it getting scuffed since I never plan on reselling it since this is the first time I saved up and bought my first phone but every time I want to take the case off I just think how much nicer it'll look years down the line when I go back and see this beautiful machine without a scratch looking like it just came out fresh from the factory.", '>>{ethicsingamesjournal} : Everyone supporting Clinton is a shill, got it. Polls are skewed by the shills.', ">>{aggie1391} : No, but this is saying no clinic that does them at all (except for rape or life of the mother) is able to receive federal funds. It doesn't matter that federal funding doesn't go to abortions, they will now stop it from going from any clinic that provides abortions period.", '>>{Manafort} : >Everyone supporting Clinton is a shill, got it. Polls are skewed by the shills. None of this was said or implied. B- strawman.', '>>{ShyBiDude89} : We all know what you meant by the "minute old account", just like how we know what you\'re daddy, Donald Trump, meant when he talks.', ">>{FrederikTwn} : I have a matte black and although I wear a case I still like to keep it free from scratches. They might not be visible, but when I wear a transparent case, show it off or whatever, then I prefer no scratches. I do switch every year, so it's not really an issue. Just switches my 6S Plus last week and it too was spotless/ scratch free.", '>>{eighteencircle9} : Relatively speaking, there will definitely be better looking phones in the future aka years down the line.', ">>{eighteencircle9} : Been naked since day 1 and that's how this phone will meet its fate, good or bad. I have paid shit tons of money for this phone and I want to feel it how it was made. I know folks will say, it is expensive and that's why you should protect it. But my argument is, it is expensive because it is beautiful.", ">>{Zerba} : It sounds like they are saying if the clinic performs abortions they can't get medicaid money at all, even for other things. I could be wrong though, but that just is what the wording looks like", '>>{DangWhatAStory} : To be fair, "Mad Dog" gets a ton of respect from the marines; he actually isn\'t that much of a war hawk and truly understands Middle Eastern culture -- instead of just stereotyping it.', '>>{Pillowry_Clinton} : Da. We Russian operatives are confused. Why do Saudi operatives work openly with Clinton while we must hide our activity?', ">>{RepelGropers} : So how's that drainy swampy stuff workin' out for ya? https://youtu.be/ILQzjw6zs6M More like the Billionaire's Ball.", '>>{badmotherfucker1969} : The first section is the one to defund Planned Parenthood. Let there be no doubt what really matters to Republicans', '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : > dicks out for the electoral college r/ofcoursethatsathing', ">>{DickButtwoman} : >We have to trust him No, you really don't.", '>>{Chinese-Shill} : Yessssss trust him. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. China watches', '>>{Puffin_fan} : Swamp is a noun. Swampy is an adjective. To swamp is a verb, BUT it is usually reflective, as in \'I am swamped with laundry taking care of these (blankedty blank) kids. " The former is probably originating in the 18th to 19th century. The verb form is very recent, by my guess. Suggest going right to the Oxford dictioinary (on line, ideally). I am going to make a wild bet that Shakespeare only used it as a noun if at all. It sounds very Germanic (like, is there a German verb Schwempen ?). Not related to the derivation of the term "Shemp" (at least to the best of my knowledge).', '>>{Puffin_fan} : a dialectal survival from an Old English cognate of Old Norse svöppr sponge, fungus," from Proto-Germanic *swampuz; " Also, known as a morass. So, in one way, you could say that Dft is being morassed.', '>>{LeftMarketAnarchist} : I have lost faith in the American electorate. For sane people, master your skillset and be prepared to move to Eurasia in 20-30 years.', ">>{Fender6969} : I'm using the Spigen Matte Black Thin Fit on my 7+. I simply needed a case with a bit more grip that still maintains its sleek profile. This checked all the boxes. I threw a tempered glass on the screen to keep the screen protected. Having recently sold my 6s+, I had the same set up and my phone was in mint condition when I ripped everything off to sell it. I plan on doing the same thing in the next 3ish years.", '>>{KingVikram} : For me the phone is to slippery without a case. Also, I I go for the thinnest case with lips that I can get.', '>>{irishstevenj} : Yes, how dare Democrats not listen to these people.', ">>{futant462} : It's their version of a mandate but with more bootstraps and individual responsibility.", '>>{omeow} : >Sec 103, on pages 2-4. Clinics that provide abortions can no longer use federal funds from Medicaid. So basically if you have nothing to do with abortion but you rely on planned Parenthood for healthcare you are fucked. Good job Republicans.', '>>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : We need to overhaul healthcare....better start by making sure we screw women as much as possible', ">>{majnus} : I'm a freak when it comes to this. Even though I'm not holding on to my phones for longer than a year, I still take ridiculous care. When I'm selling my phones they look as good as day one. I remember one time few years back I dropped my phone (slipped out of the pocket) and I had a scuff on the corner. Phone was one month old but I couldn't stand it and I sold it at a loss just to buy a new one. That applies to all my stuff, whether it's car, laptop or a phone. This way I get to easily sell my stuff and at a good value.", '>>{irishstevenj} : They do, because they never trusted Obama, and pretty much elected the complete opposite.', '>>{politicalanimalz} : Which the Supreme Court will bounce right off of the bat. This might be a poison pill designed by the GOP to take credit for passing a repeal bill as they promised, full well knowing that "those damn activist judges won\'t let us do it!" The GOP, Trump, etc. takes credit with the base while not actually having to upset the apple cart at all.', ">>{Megaloman71} : It's a classic con. They have enough emotional investment that they'll stay around for the take.", '>>{NotCurious} : Are you part of the upgrade program or do you sell every year?', '>>{cbmlover} : Is it just me or does it seem like that the bill favours insurance companies more than the people who need health care?', ">>{NotCurious} : That's what I did with the iPhone 7. I feel like it's expensive though! I am paying $40 a month for my iPhone.", ">>{FrederikTwn} : Yeah, I'm paying ~35 a month. It's kind of expensive, but, in a year, not as much as the phone itself.", '>>{spunkychickpea} : Clarification: a big, runny, "I had two consecutive meals at Denny\'s" shit on the poor', '>>{NotCurious} : So after 12 months, we can upgrade right? I know I want to upgrade to the next iPhone if they really are moving away from a home button.', '>>{DickButtwoman} : Some of them did. But he ran on a platform of vague hope and change, and didn\'t give people hope or change in these places. It\'s why over-promising is dumb. Your policy platform only gets normalized if you can hand it off to a successor who\'s going to keep it around. If you over-promise, and get a backlash, you just won the presidency and spent 8 years working at it for literally nothing. It\'s why you should always point and laugh at a Sanders fan who says, and I quote "Well, she should have promised more, because a policy platform is useless if she doesn\'t get elected" Getting elected on vague promises isn\'t any better. You just end up with people who were on the fence about believing it now completely in the hands of the opposition.', '>>{LBJ20XX} : Apparently you can use [Donald Trump sniffing to create a beat.](https://youtu.be/N-w9c6zYLS0) Found my new favorite sub. Later /r/pol, I got some real work to do today.', '>>{CollumMcJingleballs} : >"I don\'t like the indoctrination that goes on in the public schools. They teach the theory of evolution as truth," said Barlow, who has an infant grandson. "If people want to send their kids to a Christian school, they should get help with that." There\'s no hope for these yokels. I hope the red states and blue states just go their own way after this shit. These people want to live in a Jesus land', ">>{brunnock} : *I don't like the indoctrination that goes on in the public schools. They teach the theory of evolution as truth.* Jesus Christ.", ">>{iammenotu} : Yes. What's interesting is this was attempted by Texas. Texas pulled Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood because Planned Parenthood provides abortions in some of its clinics in Texas. That was just recently struck down by a federal judge's [ruling](http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/abortion/320551-judge-stops-texas-cutting-planned-parenthood-medicaid-report). So, if federal legislation is passed stating the same, it could be challenged with a short precedent and ruling having already been set.", ">>{santaisafraud} : I keep my phone for 3 years rather than 2 so the scratches when I come to resell affect the resale value less than a 2yr old phone (% wise). For that reason I'm not that anal about it. If I was on an annual upgrade plan I would case the shit out of my phone as a scratch can easily cost you £100 or more after a year.", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I don't think you know what that term means.", ">>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : Pork barrel spending is added as riders and ammendments to just about anything Congress works on. I believe tge original ACA had a rider requiring wood arrows be used for bow hunting in certain states to support some Senator's home state arrow production.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : So what in this bill are you saying is pork?', '>>{black_krim} : How many of these dipshits could even name a single program run by the Department of Energy? How many of them know that the DOE is responsible for our nuclear weaponry? How many know that the DOE leads the way on much of genomic research? The goddamn ignorance of wanting to destroy this department (or have it be managed by Rick Perry) is infuriating.', ">>{wandreylust} : I used to really care and what especially drove me up the wall were those little flakes of whatever that would get under clear cases and imprint themselves into the soft aluminum but now I honestly don't care. I don't go banging it around but even in the case, the wear and tear adds character and a story to my phone.", ">>{Time4Red} : This is a bit naive. We've had worse elections before. I was just talking about the 1928 election earlier today. Hoover ran on a platform of small government and supported a form of crony capitalism while in office. His Democratic opponent, Al Smith, supported a series of increasingly popular progressive reforms that he had instituted in New York state. Unfortunately, the discourse around the election was centered on Smith's Catholicism. Hoover supporters circulated popular conspiracy theories that suggested Smith would allow the Pope to rule the US from a fortress in DC. It was beyond ridiculous. Smith ended up losing in a landslide.", ">>{loki8481} : I feel like Trump himself is going to be disappointed to learn that all of his generals aren't the movie-version of Patton reincarnated.", ">>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : Read through the bill and realized that tge lotto portions pertain to healthcare coverage eligibility for winners, and is not lottery related pork. I was using the term correctly but failed in reading the bill when I skimmed it. I imagine tge final bill will have plenty of amendments as they don't have the votes right now", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : That was my point. Cutting entitlements isn't usually what people consider as pork. Sure, I assume there will be amendments.", ">>{gerwen} : >For me the phone is to slippery without a case. Same here. My last caseless phone was the 5. 6 and 7 I constantly feel like I'm going to drop it.", '>>{Another-Chance} : Yeah, getting an education seems like a liberal plot to isis, err I mean those other conservative religious people here in the US.', '>>{StrawberryHousewife} : > "The guys he\'s putting in there, they don\'t need to do this. They\'re independently wealthy," said Trump voter Roger Mansfield, 67, a small business owner in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. "They don\'t need any more money. The motivation is to make pragmatic, rational business decisions. What could be wrong about that?" Yep, what could possibly be wrong about that?! Also: > "I don\'t like the indoctrination that goes on in the public schools. They teach the theory of evolution as truth," said Barlow, who has an infant grandson. I feel so very sorry for those kids who will grow up and don\'t get to have a good education. They are being fed this ridiculous creationism nonsense because their parents are too small-minded to accept facts. Know why they teach evolution as truth? Because it\'s the truth. I went to a private catholic school and we learned more about biology, evolution and science than those kids ever will.', ">>{FrederikTwn} : Yep, that's right! The new glass one looks awesome and I'd love and Oled display + touch the screen to wake. Not sure how I feel about the edge to edge display, in regards to cases.", ">>{_bearly} : I got my 7 in Jet Black and it is already a bit beat up. It *is* less slippery in the hand but it slips right off of a lap or the arm of a couch. I got a Smart Battery Case but when I don't want to use it, AppleCare is a case of its own.", ">>{Predictive} : There's no antidote for mass hysteria and foaming at the mouth.", ">>{10EtZe} : I have iPhone 6s, 8 months old, I have case from spigen, I'm cleaning the phone every week and after all this I have annoying sparks on the back, can't understand why 😟", '>>{unexpectedrpdr} : inb4 WOW REAL LIBERAL TOLERANCE YA GOT THERE THIS IS WHY TRUMP ONE', '>>{unexpectedrpdr} : If there is one thing catastrophic income inequality has shown us, it is that the rich will definitely never ever ever do anything to get richer because they are already content with their billions.', ">>{thenakedgat} : I have that one as well. The first scuff or two were painful lol but now it just looks used. My MacBook isn't pristine either because it gets used.", ">>{Dark-N1ghtmar3} : When u plan to resell a iPhone u want it pristine and so do buyers u don't want to buy a scratched phone for a ton of money would u?", ">>{WarPhalange} : This is why Trump won. At some point we really have to stop coddling morons. We can't let people who ignore objective reality have a significant impact on our society.", '>>{Bronafide} : Really guys this is exactly what Trump said he would do and his supports are happy with his picks, in their minds he did drain the swap. Every time you imply he didnt drain the swap your just proving your own ignorance of Trumps campaign.', '>>{SJUNLIN} : Was it worth it though in the end? Did you end up selling that phone away?', ">>{BenitoCheeto} : Poor dumb bastards. They have no idea what's coming.", '>>{GoodIdea321} : I never knew how much I wanted a Pope Fortress until now.', ">>{brunnock} : *I don't like the indoctrination that goes on in the public schools. They teach the theory of evolution as truth.* What do you say to someone like that?", '>>{Jankx} : These people belong in camps. GED camps at least.', ">>{Citizen_Sn1ps} : Easily. I'm confident it wasn't even close to his idea as well.", ">>{SJUNLIN} : Which is why I am so into the Apple cases which have the inner microsuede lining. They're expensive and offer no protection on the bottom but if you're a careful user, the case will protect the phone well from those dust specks that get in between the case and phone.", ">>{Citizen_Sn1ps} : Rodger Mansfield is living in a delusional world where billionaires think they don't need any more money.", ">>{SJUNLIN} : I once had that thinking with my iPhone 5. That the wear and tear gives it a unique look that screams 'me' but over the years, my OCD is getting the better of me and even a tiny scratch can sometimes drive me crazy as well.", ">>{Doom_Art} : I'm a progressive who voted for Bernie in the primary. I'm on the left side of left. Mattis was a goddamn good pick, and if Trump leaves him to manage things on his own, I have no doubt he'll do a good job.", ">>{OscarMiguelRamirez} : He admitted he doesn't know what the phrase means and only repeated it because someone told him to and the crowds loved it. It's impossible to say he delivered on a promise he couldn't even comprehend. It's utter nonsense to anyone who hasn't drunk the kool-aid. I don't care what these people claim since its gibberish.", ">>{SJUNLIN} : Yea, I do upgrade my phone yearly but I do not think I'll be selling my 7+ when I get my hands on the next iPhone. It'll serve as a backup phone, an iOS beta tester and a testing device for all other 3rd party software and app tweaks. But having said that, I'm still rather anal about scratches.", ">>{SJUNLIN} : Yea the first few scratches are painful. But after that you kinda get used to it and don't baby your phone as much. Which is why I'm on the fence about wanting to sell mine off at a loss to rebuy or just stick to what I have and move on. I don't intend to sell this when I get my hands on the next iPhone this September though.", ">>{AmbivalentFanatic} : That piece of work in the photo probably voted Trump because it's been so long since anyone grabbed her by the pussy.", ">>{thenakedgat} : Cool it'll be interesting to see what they come up with in September! I do the carrier upgrade every second year or so.", '>>{goody_heggety} : Becky DeVos (upcoming Sec-Ed) wants vouchers to pay for that.', ">>{10EtZe} : But as you said, it doesn't protect the bottom, my wife have case like this, she dropped the phone only ones and unfortunately the phone have dropping markets.", ">>{goody_heggety} : Not being snarky here, and also a Bernie-voter in the primary. What about Mattis do you think is good? (I want to take Bernie's advice to heart: fight Trump on the bad stuff, at least be open-minded to the clock being right twice a day otherwise.)", '>>{wandreylust} : I bought my iphone 5 secondhand and dinged up and it bothered me to the point of me getting a brand new housing but now times have changed for the opposite', ">>{SJUNLIN} : Yea but the iPhone 7s' housing cannot be replaced by ourselves or 3rd parties if we want to maintain the water resistance capability. Now that's a bummer. If not for that, I'll gladly get a new housing and wait out for months down the line when the phone is beat up and just swap over.", '>>{brunnock} : GOP would love that. Churches and religious schools can racially discriminate legally.', ">>{Yer_A_Wizard_Hagrid} : Ah well, luckily nothing too bad ever happened under Hoover's watch. We should be fine. No need to get like.. greatly depressed or anything over the 2016 election.", ">>{Time4Red} : That's...a good point. But hey, we survived the great depression.", ">>{BotnetSpam} : You teach them evolution? Hell, maybe you have to teach them the scientific method first, or maybe even how to read. But we certainly can't shame or berate these dummies into being any smarter. We have to try to help them. We have to. Otherwise the division only grows.", ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : I really like how people who've screwed over millions of little guys are the ones Trump says won't screw over millions of little guys anymore."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{billthomson} : > That system would provide less financial assistance for low-income and older people than ObamaCare, but could give more assistance to younger people and those with somewhat higher incomes. This is the crux of it. People who don't need assistance will pay less, due to the mandate being eliminated and less assistance to the needy.", '>>{aggie1391} : Sec 103, on pages 2-4. Clinics that provide abortions can no longer use federal funds from Medicaid.', ">>{sarge21} : Also, it's a tax credit. So, absolutely no help to poorer people", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : More than 10% of the bill is about Lottery winners...', '>>{bassististist} : > So, absolutely no help to poorer people Well, TBH, they should have voted Democrat.', '>>{spunkychickpea} : Am I reading this right? (Paraphrasing) Any person who has a gap in coverage will not be subject to a pre-existing condition clause, but will pay a penalty in the form of a surcharge to their premium of 30%. Now, I know my insurance (health insurance employee for over eight years) but legalese still escapes me. So basically, if you can\'t afford insurance for six months because you lost your job, your insurance will now be 30% more expensive, thus making it harder for you to get insurance, thus causing you to wait longer to restore your coverage. "Hey, I know you couldn\'t afford an $800 a month policy six months ago, but we can make it all better by selling you the exact same thing for $1040 a month!" Fuck this bill.', ">>{spunkychickpea} : That's the part that infuriates me the most. So if somebody can't afford their coverage now, how does a tax credit in nine months help them get their medication today? Oh, right. They're just gonna have to die. I understand now.", ">>{aggie1391} : No, but this is saying no clinic that does them at all (except for rape or life of the mother) is able to receive federal funds. It doesn't matter that federal funding doesn't go to abortions, they will now stop it from going from any clinic that provides abortions period.", ">>{Zerba} : It sounds like they are saying if the clinic performs abortions they can't get medicaid money at all, even for other things. I could be wrong though, but that just is what the wording looks like", '>>{badmotherfucker1969} : The first section is the one to defund Planned Parenthood. Let there be no doubt what really matters to Republicans', ">>{futant462} : It's their version of a mandate but with more bootstraps and individual responsibility.", '>>{omeow} : >Sec 103, on pages 2-4. Clinics that provide abortions can no longer use federal funds from Medicaid. So basically if you have nothing to do with abortion but you rely on planned Parenthood for healthcare you are fucked. Good job Republicans.', '>>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : We need to overhaul healthcare....better start by making sure we screw women as much as possible', '>>{politicalanimalz} : Which the Supreme Court will bounce right off of the bat. This might be a poison pill designed by the GOP to take credit for passing a repeal bill as they promised, full well knowing that "those damn activist judges won\'t let us do it!" The GOP, Trump, etc. takes credit with the base while not actually having to upset the apple cart at all.', '>>{cbmlover} : Is it just me or does it seem like that the bill favours insurance companies more than the people who need health care?', '>>{spunkychickpea} : Clarification: a big, runny, "I had two consecutive meals at Denny\'s" shit on the poor', ">>{iammenotu} : Yes. What's interesting is this was attempted by Texas. Texas pulled Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood because Planned Parenthood provides abortions in some of its clinics in Texas. That was just recently struck down by a federal judge's [ruling](http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/abortion/320551-judge-stops-texas-cutting-planned-parenthood-medicaid-report). So, if federal legislation is passed stating the same, it could be challenged with a short precedent and ruling having already been set.", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : I don't think you know what that term means.", ">>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : Pork barrel spending is added as riders and ammendments to just about anything Congress works on. I believe tge original ACA had a rider requiring wood arrows be used for bow hunting in certain states to support some Senator's home state arrow production.", '>>{Donald_J_Putin} : So what in this bill are you saying is pork?', ">>{A_TEMPORAL_TOURIST} : Read through the bill and realized that tge lotto portions pertain to healthcare coverage eligibility for winners, and is not lottery related pork. I was using the term correctly but failed in reading the bill when I skimmed it. I imagine tge final bill will have plenty of amendments as they don't have the votes right now", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : That was my point. Cutting entitlements isn't usually what people consider as pork. Sure, I assume there will be amendments."], ['>>{Manafort} : Very first post on a minute old account. Interesting.', '>>{Mahale} : It finally dawned on me why Trump is doing so well in Nevada. I imagine the casino owners and all the mob stuff that goes along with it is pumping tons of cash into his campaign and doing local work behind the scenes.', ">>{KaitRaven} : There's also the fact that Nevada has one of the lowest rates of college education in the country.", ">>{BernardKornblum} : Uhh no. It's being used as a verb.", '>>{ethicsingamesjournal} : Everyone supporting Clinton is a shill, got it. Polls are skewed by the shills.', '>>{Manafort} : >Everyone supporting Clinton is a shill, got it. Polls are skewed by the shills. None of this was said or implied. B- strawman.', '>>{ShyBiDude89} : We all know what you meant by the "minute old account", just like how we know what you\'re daddy, Donald Trump, meant when he talks.', '>>{Pillowry_Clinton} : Da. We Russian operatives are confused. Why do Saudi operatives work openly with Clinton while we must hide our activity?', '>>{Puffin_fan} : Swamp is a noun. Swampy is an adjective. To swamp is a verb, BUT it is usually reflective, as in \'I am swamped with laundry taking care of these (blankedty blank) kids. " The former is probably originating in the 18th to 19th century. The verb form is very recent, by my guess. Suggest going right to the Oxford dictioinary (on line, ideally). I am going to make a wild bet that Shakespeare only used it as a noun if at all. It sounds very Germanic (like, is there a German verb Schwempen ?). Not related to the derivation of the term "Shemp" (at least to the best of my knowledge).', '>>{Puffin_fan} : a dialectal survival from an Old English cognate of Old Norse svöppr sponge, fungus," from Proto-Germanic *swampuz; " Also, known as a morass. So, in one way, you could say that Dft is being morassed.'], ['>>{SJUNLIN} : How many of you care to have a phone perfect from scratches and dings?', ">>{TheJohnny346} : I currently have a Jet Black iPhone 7 Plus and I keep telling myself to take the case off and use it as is to see it in all its glory. I don't care about it getting scuffed since I never plan on reselling it since this is the first time I saved up and bought my first phone but every time I want to take the case off I just think how much nicer it'll look years down the line when I go back and see this beautiful machine without a scratch looking like it just came out fresh from the factory.", ">>{FrederikTwn} : I have a matte black and although I wear a case I still like to keep it free from scratches. They might not be visible, but when I wear a transparent case, show it off or whatever, then I prefer no scratches. I do switch every year, so it's not really an issue. Just switches my 6S Plus last week and it too was spotless/ scratch free.", '>>{eighteencircle9} : Relatively speaking, there will definitely be better looking phones in the future aka years down the line.', ">>{eighteencircle9} : Been naked since day 1 and that's how this phone will meet its fate, good or bad. I have paid shit tons of money for this phone and I want to feel it how it was made. I know folks will say, it is expensive and that's why you should protect it. But my argument is, it is expensive because it is beautiful.", ">>{Fender6969} : I'm using the Spigen Matte Black Thin Fit on my 7+. I simply needed a case with a bit more grip that still maintains its sleek profile. This checked all the boxes. I threw a tempered glass on the screen to keep the screen protected. Having recently sold my 6s+, I had the same set up and my phone was in mint condition when I ripped everything off to sell it. I plan on doing the same thing in the next 3ish years.", '>>{KingVikram} : For me the phone is to slippery without a case. Also, I I go for the thinnest case with lips that I can get.', ">>{majnus} : I'm a freak when it comes to this. Even though I'm not holding on to my phones for longer than a year, I still take ridiculous care. When I'm selling my phones they look as good as day one. I remember one time few years back I dropped my phone (slipped out of the pocket) and I had a scuff on the corner. Phone was one month old but I couldn't stand it and I sold it at a loss just to buy a new one. That applies to all my stuff, whether it's car, laptop or a phone. This way I get to easily sell my stuff and at a good value.", '>>{NotCurious} : Are you part of the upgrade program or do you sell every year?', ">>{NotCurious} : That's what I did with the iPhone 7. I feel like it's expensive though! I am paying $40 a month for my iPhone.", ">>{FrederikTwn} : Yeah, I'm paying ~35 a month. It's kind of expensive, but, in a year, not as much as the phone itself.", '>>{NotCurious} : So after 12 months, we can upgrade right? I know I want to upgrade to the next iPhone if they really are moving away from a home button.', ">>{santaisafraud} : I keep my phone for 3 years rather than 2 so the scratches when I come to resell affect the resale value less than a 2yr old phone (% wise). For that reason I'm not that anal about it. If I was on an annual upgrade plan I would case the shit out of my phone as a scratch can easily cost you £100 or more after a year.", ">>{wandreylust} : I used to really care and what especially drove me up the wall were those little flakes of whatever that would get under clear cases and imprint themselves into the soft aluminum but now I honestly don't care. I don't go banging it around but even in the case, the wear and tear adds character and a story to my phone.", ">>{gerwen} : >For me the phone is to slippery without a case. Same here. My last caseless phone was the 5. 6 and 7 I constantly feel like I'm going to drop it.", ">>{FrederikTwn} : Yep, that's right! The new glass one looks awesome and I'd love and Oled display + touch the screen to wake. Not sure how I feel about the edge to edge display, in regards to cases.", ">>{_bearly} : I got my 7 in Jet Black and it is already a bit beat up. It *is* less slippery in the hand but it slips right off of a lap or the arm of a couch. I got a Smart Battery Case but when I don't want to use it, AppleCare is a case of its own.", ">>{10EtZe} : I have iPhone 6s, 8 months old, I have case from spigen, I'm cleaning the phone every week and after all this I have annoying sparks on the back, can't understand why 😟", ">>{thenakedgat} : I have that one as well. The first scuff or two were painful lol but now it just looks used. My MacBook isn't pristine either because it gets used.", ">>{Dark-N1ghtmar3} : When u plan to resell a iPhone u want it pristine and so do buyers u don't want to buy a scratched phone for a ton of money would u?", '>>{SJUNLIN} : Was it worth it though in the end? Did you end up selling that phone away?', ">>{SJUNLIN} : Which is why I am so into the Apple cases which have the inner microsuede lining. They're expensive and offer no protection on the bottom but if you're a careful user, the case will protect the phone well from those dust specks that get in between the case and phone.", ">>{SJUNLIN} : I once had that thinking with my iPhone 5. That the wear and tear gives it a unique look that screams 'me' but over the years, my OCD is getting the better of me and even a tiny scratch can sometimes drive me crazy as well.", ">>{SJUNLIN} : Yea, I do upgrade my phone yearly but I do not think I'll be selling my 7+ when I get my hands on the next iPhone. It'll serve as a backup phone, an iOS beta tester and a testing device for all other 3rd party software and app tweaks. But having said that, I'm still rather anal about scratches.", ">>{SJUNLIN} : Yea the first few scratches are painful. But after that you kinda get used to it and don't baby your phone as much. Which is why I'm on the fence about wanting to sell mine off at a loss to rebuy or just stick to what I have and move on. I don't intend to sell this when I get my hands on the next iPhone this September though.", ">>{thenakedgat} : Cool it'll be interesting to see what they come up with in September! I do the carrier upgrade every second year or so.", ">>{10EtZe} : But as you said, it doesn't protect the bottom, my wife have case like this, she dropped the phone only ones and unfortunately the phone have dropping markets.", '>>{wandreylust} : I bought my iphone 5 secondhand and dinged up and it bothered me to the point of me getting a brand new housing but now times have changed for the opposite', ">>{SJUNLIN} : Yea but the iPhone 7s' housing cannot be replaced by ourselves or 3rd parties if we want to maintain the water resistance capability. Now that's a bummer. If not for that, I'll gladly get a new housing and wait out for months down the line when the phone is beat up and just swap over."], [">>{Another-Chance} : Trump Cabinet excites his voters: 'We have to trust him'", '>>{LBJ20XX} : In before the talks about intelligence, people getting what they deserve, orange faced baboon, dicks out for the electoral college, blah blah blah blah blah.', '>>{Another-Chance} : *To them, the idea of a defense secretary nicknamed "Mad Dog" is bliss. They rejoice in an energy secretary who once said he would eliminate the Department of Energy. And while some Trump supporters balk at ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson\'s close ties with Russia\'s Vladimir Putin, they say they will trust Trump\'s judgment about his secretary of state nominee.* Yeah, they sure sound all smurt and stuff, huh huh, git r done folks. "We done trust us up some trump cause he lies better n old cooter down at the bar. If ya can\'t trust cooter who can ya trust we always a says!"', '>>{Another-Chance} : I took care of that for you cause I am nice guy.', ">>{shelbys_foot} : I suppose if they were gullible enough to vote for him in the first place, it'll take a while before they're disabused.", '>>{DangWhatAStory} : To be fair, "Mad Dog" gets a ton of respect from the marines; he actually isn\'t that much of a war hawk and truly understands Middle Eastern culture -- instead of just stereotyping it.', ">>{RepelGropers} : So how's that drainy swampy stuff workin' out for ya? https://youtu.be/ILQzjw6zs6M More like the Billionaire's Ball.", '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : > dicks out for the electoral college r/ofcoursethatsathing', ">>{DickButtwoman} : >We have to trust him No, you really don't.", '>>{Chinese-Shill} : Yessssss trust him. Hahahaha. Hahahaha. China watches', '>>{LeftMarketAnarchist} : I have lost faith in the American electorate. For sane people, master your skillset and be prepared to move to Eurasia in 20-30 years.', '>>{irishstevenj} : Yes, how dare Democrats not listen to these people.', '>>{irishstevenj} : They do, because they never trusted Obama, and pretty much elected the complete opposite.', ">>{Megaloman71} : It's a classic con. They have enough emotional investment that they'll stay around for the take.", '>>{DickButtwoman} : Some of them did. But he ran on a platform of vague hope and change, and didn\'t give people hope or change in these places. It\'s why over-promising is dumb. Your policy platform only gets normalized if you can hand it off to a successor who\'s going to keep it around. If you over-promise, and get a backlash, you just won the presidency and spent 8 years working at it for literally nothing. It\'s why you should always point and laugh at a Sanders fan who says, and I quote "Well, she should have promised more, because a policy platform is useless if she doesn\'t get elected" Getting elected on vague promises isn\'t any better. You just end up with people who were on the fence about believing it now completely in the hands of the opposition.', '>>{LBJ20XX} : Apparently you can use [Donald Trump sniffing to create a beat.](https://youtu.be/N-w9c6zYLS0) Found my new favorite sub. Later /r/pol, I got some real work to do today.', '>>{CollumMcJingleballs} : >"I don\'t like the indoctrination that goes on in the public schools. They teach the theory of evolution as truth," said Barlow, who has an infant grandson. "If people want to send their kids to a Christian school, they should get help with that." There\'s no hope for these yokels. I hope the red states and blue states just go their own way after this shit. These people want to live in a Jesus land', ">>{brunnock} : *I don't like the indoctrination that goes on in the public schools. They teach the theory of evolution as truth.* Jesus Christ.", '>>{black_krim} : How many of these dipshits could even name a single program run by the Department of Energy? How many of them know that the DOE is responsible for our nuclear weaponry? How many know that the DOE leads the way on much of genomic research? The goddamn ignorance of wanting to destroy this department (or have it be managed by Rick Perry) is infuriating.', ">>{Time4Red} : This is a bit naive. We've had worse elections before. I was just talking about the 1928 election earlier today. Hoover ran on a platform of small government and supported a form of crony capitalism while in office. His Democratic opponent, Al Smith, supported a series of increasingly popular progressive reforms that he had instituted in New York state. Unfortunately, the discourse around the election was centered on Smith's Catholicism. Hoover supporters circulated popular conspiracy theories that suggested Smith would allow the Pope to rule the US from a fortress in DC. It was beyond ridiculous. Smith ended up losing in a landslide.", ">>{loki8481} : I feel like Trump himself is going to be disappointed to learn that all of his generals aren't the movie-version of Patton reincarnated.", '>>{Another-Chance} : Yeah, getting an education seems like a liberal plot to isis, err I mean those other conservative religious people here in the US.', '>>{StrawberryHousewife} : > "The guys he\'s putting in there, they don\'t need to do this. They\'re independently wealthy," said Trump voter Roger Mansfield, 67, a small business owner in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. "They don\'t need any more money. The motivation is to make pragmatic, rational business decisions. What could be wrong about that?" Yep, what could possibly be wrong about that?! Also: > "I don\'t like the indoctrination that goes on in the public schools. They teach the theory of evolution as truth," said Barlow, who has an infant grandson. I feel so very sorry for those kids who will grow up and don\'t get to have a good education. They are being fed this ridiculous creationism nonsense because their parents are too small-minded to accept facts. Know why they teach evolution as truth? Because it\'s the truth. I went to a private catholic school and we learned more about biology, evolution and science than those kids ever will.', ">>{Predictive} : There's no antidote for mass hysteria and foaming at the mouth.", '>>{unexpectedrpdr} : inb4 WOW REAL LIBERAL TOLERANCE YA GOT THERE THIS IS WHY TRUMP ONE', '>>{unexpectedrpdr} : If there is one thing catastrophic income inequality has shown us, it is that the rich will definitely never ever ever do anything to get richer because they are already content with their billions.', ">>{WarPhalange} : This is why Trump won. At some point we really have to stop coddling morons. We can't let people who ignore objective reality have a significant impact on our society.", '>>{Bronafide} : Really guys this is exactly what Trump said he would do and his supports are happy with his picks, in their minds he did drain the swap. Every time you imply he didnt drain the swap your just proving your own ignorance of Trumps campaign.', ">>{BenitoCheeto} : Poor dumb bastards. They have no idea what's coming.", '>>{GoodIdea321} : I never knew how much I wanted a Pope Fortress until now.', ">>{brunnock} : *I don't like the indoctrination that goes on in the public schools. They teach the theory of evolution as truth.* What do you say to someone like that?", '>>{Jankx} : These people belong in camps. GED camps at least.', ">>{Citizen_Sn1ps} : Easily. I'm confident it wasn't even close to his idea as well.", ">>{Citizen_Sn1ps} : Rodger Mansfield is living in a delusional world where billionaires think they don't need any more money.", ">>{Doom_Art} : I'm a progressive who voted for Bernie in the primary. I'm on the left side of left. Mattis was a goddamn good pick, and if Trump leaves him to manage things on his own, I have no doubt he'll do a good job.", ">>{OscarMiguelRamirez} : He admitted he doesn't know what the phrase means and only repeated it because someone told him to and the crowds loved it. It's impossible to say he delivered on a promise he couldn't even comprehend. It's utter nonsense to anyone who hasn't drunk the kool-aid. I don't care what these people claim since its gibberish.", ">>{AmbivalentFanatic} : That piece of work in the photo probably voted Trump because it's been so long since anyone grabbed her by the pussy.", '>>{goody_heggety} : Becky DeVos (upcoming Sec-Ed) wants vouchers to pay for that.', ">>{goody_heggety} : Not being snarky here, and also a Bernie-voter in the primary. What about Mattis do you think is good? (I want to take Bernie's advice to heart: fight Trump on the bad stuff, at least be open-minded to the clock being right twice a day otherwise.)", '>>{brunnock} : GOP would love that. Churches and religious schools can racially discriminate legally.', ">>{Yer_A_Wizard_Hagrid} : Ah well, luckily nothing too bad ever happened under Hoover's watch. We should be fine. No need to get like.. greatly depressed or anything over the 2016 election.", ">>{Time4Red} : That's...a good point. But hey, we survived the great depression.", ">>{BotnetSpam} : You teach them evolution? Hell, maybe you have to teach them the scientific method first, or maybe even how to read. But we certainly can't shame or berate these dummies into being any smarter. We have to try to help them. We have to. Otherwise the division only grows.", ">>{Cindernubblebutt} : I really like how people who've screwed over millions of little guys are the ones Trump says won't screw over millions of little guys anymore."]]

classify and reply

[">>{SaltHash} : He was criticized for that. Now it is Conway's turn to be criticized for her trashy behavior.", '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : What a joke. If they dislike the Democrats gun bills, then they need to acknowledge the issues with the Republican gun bills as well. The first called for research into psychological factors that lead to gun violence, and quite literally used the effects of violent video games as an example of what we need to research. The second bill wanted the FBI to be able to put together a case in 3 days. It takes a lot longer to put together a case than 3 days.', '>>{winstonsmith7} : The non Democratic bills would give people a chance to correct errors secret lists of "terrorists" AKA whoever the government names terrorists, factual basis or not. No accountability whatsoever. When Bush and Co. came up with this nonsense I was appalled, and with Obama I hoped it would be significantly changed. Well, yes. He\'s far worse than Bush ever was. Dems would rather have no gun legislation and make a fuss in Congress before having "their" agenda taken from them. It\'s about political hay and being seen to do something, even if nothing happens.', ">>{pump_the_brakes_son} : i don't remember the media going gaga over Obama's shoes being on a desk.", ">>{CurtlyCurlyAlex} : > he first called for research into psychological factors that lead to gun violence, and quite literally used the effects of violent video games as an example of what we need to research. Don't take our guns away from video games either, man! [We're not hurting anyone!](http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/12/study-finds-no-evidence-violent-video-games-make-children-aggres/)", '>>{Jas9191} : I was a senior in high school, I remember.', '>>{Ainjyll} : The GOP\'s triumph of inserting the Constitutional due process was a joke. Three days is all that was allowed. I have a friend who happens to share a name with a man on the No Fly list. They look absolutely nothing alike. One is tall, thin and arabic. The other is short, stocky and African american. Regardless, it took him several months to get it all straightened out. So, don\'t let the hype fool you both sides are playing politics, but the GOP is the worse of the culprits. They put forth bills that wouldn\'t ever get voted for because of their obvious faults and now they get to sit back and say, "but we gave you a bill and you didn\'t want it". It\'s not about putting out a bill and saying take it or leave it. Compromise is key and until we begin to have it again, we won\'t see anything good from Congress.', ">>{TribeOnAQuest} : Who cares either way man. I don't care about Obama having his foot on a desk during a call, nor do I care about Conway being on a couch. Don't get caught up in this media boondoggle it means nothing.", '>>{winstonsmith7} : And what did the Democrats do? They are the ones who say that if one is on the suspect list they are terrorists, or as good as. The Republican bill wasn\'t enough, and the Democrat one nothing but "terror terror terror", which is precisely what Bush did to get us into Iraq. I despised fear mongering then and I do now. I don\'t care what party is behind it. It\'s reprehensible.', '>>{Egorse} : > He was criticized for that. It was a silly criticism because other presidents also have been photographed with their feet on the oval office desk.', ">>{in_the_saddle_again} : > Compromise is key and until we begin to have it again, we won't see anything good from Congress. If your design is to dismantle a country and not run it an ineffective government is exactly your goal.", ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : >It takes a lot longer to put together a case than 3 days. They should already have a case if they think they should be barred. It shouldn't take more than three days for them to convince a judge with what they do have.", ">>{GodHatestheJags} : It's hard to remember that far back when you're 15.", ">>{SistaSabuda} : Well yeah, it's not about gun control for safety, but removal of due process for total people control. These are the same people that say the second is for hunting; they are completely lying: >If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. The usurpers, clothed with the forms of legal authority, can too often crush the opposition in embryo. The smaller the extent of the territory, the more difficult will it be for the people to form a regular or systematic plan of opposition, and the more easy will it be to defeat their early efforts. Intelligence can be more speedily obtained of their preparations and movements, and the military force in the possession of the usurpers can be more rapidly directed against the part where the opposition has begun. In this situation there must be a peculiar coincidence of circumstances to insure success to the popular resistance. >The obstacles to usurpation and the facilities of resistance increase with the increased extent of the state, provided the citizens understand their rights and are disposed to defend them. The natural strength of the people in a large community, in proportion to the artificial strength of the government, is greater than in a small, and of course more competent to a struggle with the attempts of the government to establish a tyranny. But in a confederacy the people, without exaggeration, may be said to be entirely the masters of their own fate. Power being almost always the rival of power, the general government will at all times stand ready to check the usurpations of the state governments, and these will have the same disposition towards the general government. The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. If their rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress. How wise will it be in them by cherishing the union to preserve to themselves an advantage which can never be too highly prized! >It may safely be received as an axiom in our political system, that the State governments will, in all possible contingencies, afford complete security against invasions of the public liberty by the national authority. Projects of usurpation cannot be masked under pretenses so likely to escape the penetration of select bodies of men, as of the people at large. The legislatures will have better means of information. They can discover the danger at a distance; and possessing all the organs of civil power, and the confidence of the people, they can at once adopt a regular plan of opposition, in which they can combine all the resources of the community. They can readily communicate with each other in the different States, and unite their common forces for the protection of their common liberty. >The great extent of the country is a further security. We have already experienced its utility against the attacks of a foreign power. And it would have precisely the same effect against the enterprises of ambitious rulers in the national councils. If the federal army should be able to quell the resistance of one State, the distant States would have it in their power to make head with fresh forces. The advantages obtained in one place must be abandoned to subdue the opposition in others; and the moment the part which had been reduced to submission was left to itself, its efforts would be renewed, and its resistance revive. >We should recollect that the extent of the military force must, at all events, be regulated by the resources of the country. For a long time to come, it will not be possible to maintain a large army; and as the means of doing this increase, the population and natural strength of the community will proportionably increase. When will the time arrive that the federal government can raise and maintain an army capable of erecting a despotism over the great body of the people of an immense empire, who are in a situation, through the medium of their State governments, to take measures for their own defense, with all the celerity, regularity, and system of independent nations? The apprehension may be considered as a disease, for which there can be found no cure in the resources of argument and reasoning. >Alexander Hamilton December 26 1787", '>>{spazz720} : Google this sentence >president feet on desk Look at images', '>>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : But Obama wore a tan suit too! ^^/s', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : It is a precaution. Why do you think people are on the terror watchlist? I think it's fair to assume because they communicate with terrorists, as the Orlando shooter had. That doesn't mean they are guilty, but does the state have an interest in watching them? Yes. If there is truly no problem than they would be able to get a gun---as the Democrats bill says.", '>>{MolestedConservative} : I do. Kelly is disgusting for trying to flash a room full of men.', '>>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : What do you mean? Do you mean that the Washington Times specifically is irrelevant? If so why did you post a Washington Times article in the first place?', ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : > Why do you think people are on the terror watchlist? Lots of reasons some of them valid, some of them not. Probably many of them are not and it can be merely association with someone else who is a terrorist or communicates with them. >as the Orlando shooter had But as I recall they removed him from the list because they really didn't have evidence to connect him to actual terrorism. >but does the state have an interest in watching them? Yes Sure, they can watch him. >If there is truly no problem than they would be able to get a gun---as the Democrats bill says. No. I would rather there be a process. Perhaps a due process where the FBI at least has some meaningful evidence that they can use to convince a judge. And that is pretty fucking minimal as far as that goes.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : American citizens comprise a very small amount of people on the list. A lot of the people on that list actually deserve to be on it. He was investigated three times. He should have remained on the list, and he should not have been able to get a gun. He was also only on the FBI's watchlist, not the No Fly List. If you are talking to terrorists, you should not have a gun. It's that simple. There is a process. You can contest the FBI's ruling in court. All these people would have been able to get a gun. The Republican bill only gives them three days. It is not enough time to make an individual case, so nothing would have changed.", ">>{DPlaintiff} : Moonies ignoring the real story here - Obama looks cool and casual no matter what he's standing on.", '>>{treerat} : The wingnut media went gaga over his fist bump.', '>>{Willlll} : These are same people that act like the Obama kids were treated respectfully by the hillbilly media.', ">>{MrWigglesworth2} : >Why do you think people are on the terror watchlist? Mistakes. Because they protested against a government agency and someone in that agency added them just to punish them. These things are quite frequent with these lists. >That doesn't mean they are guilty, but does the state have an interest in watching them? Yes. And *watching* them is fine. Actively taking away their rights isn't. >If there is truly no problem than they would be able to get a gun---as the Democrats bill says. Maybe. Someday. After they prove themselves innocent, rather than the government proving they're a threat. That is not acceptable. If the government wants to take away someones rights, its on the government to prove its warranted, not the other way around. As it is, the Republican proposal only required the government to show probable cause. That is not a high bar to clear. That's the same level it takes to get a search warrant. If the government doesn't already have enough evidence to demonstrate probable cause, then the person in question didn't belong on the damn list in the first place.", '>>{kevin3g} : The nerve of him soiling the furniture with his foot when he should be cleaning it. /s', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : You think people are on the terror watchlist because of mistakes? There are plenty of legitimate entries you don't hear about---because they're legitimate. Taking away the right to own a gun from people who are suspected of terrorism is absolutely ok. They have three days to put together a case. Talking to a terrorist is not illegal, associating with them isn't illegal---as Omar Mateen has shone us. There were so many red flags but he was still able to get a gun. He should not have been able to get a gun. And he did. He deserved to be on the list. He shouldn't have been taken off it either.", ">>{MrWigglesworth2} : >Three days is all that was allowed. >took him several months to get it all straightened out. That you actually think the latter somehow exposes a problem with the former is just embarrassing. If anything it just supports it. The entire point here is that it needs to be on the government to show why you should be on the list, not on you to show why you shouldn't be. If you think otherwise, you don't care about due process, period.", '>>{_Apophis} : Google this sentence: >Strawberry vs papaya cat nipples Look at images then tell me what shows up.', ">>{yokablasta} : Right in time, WT. Wouldn't want Kellyanne's feet on the couch to go uncountered.", ">>{MrWigglesworth2} : >You think people are on the terror watchlist because of mistakes? [Loads of them.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Fly_List#Notable_cases) And some people are maliciously added. >They have three days to put together a case. They have three days to show ***probable cause.*** That's it. Probable cause is an extremely low bar to clear. If the government doesn't already have sufficient evidence to show probable cause, the person does not belong on the list in the first place.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Given that Omar Mateen had three investigations against him, and they still couldn't pin him with anything, it is not as easy as you make it sound. And Democrats agree with that, so they voted against it.", '>>{Esper21} : Seriously though... this is pretty much the level of intelligence of an average TD poster. Dumb as a fucking rock.', ">>{MrWigglesworth2} : They couldn't pin him with anything sufficient to arrest and convict him. You don't seem to understand that this does not mean they could not have demonstrated probable cause.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Well, they couldn't do it throughout three investigations. So I doubt three days would somehow be better. We are just going to have to agree to disagree on this issue.", ">>{Artificecoyote} : I think you are misunderstand wiggles worth. The FBI interviewed matteen three times and didn't have enough to formally charge him with anything. But the republican bill says the government has to show probable cause which is a lower bar legally. So if the repub bill was in place before the Orlando shooting, matteen might have been denied a gun or at least the purchase would've been on the FBI's radar. Basically the amount that the FBI needed to show to charge matteen/detain him is a lot more than what is needed for probable cause. I hope that helps your understanding.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I don't believe three days is enough time, and neither do the Democrats."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{SaltHash} : He was criticized for that. Now it is Conway's turn to be criticized for her trashy behavior.", ">>{pump_the_brakes_son} : i don't remember the media going gaga over Obama's shoes being on a desk.", '>>{Jas9191} : I was a senior in high school, I remember.', ">>{TribeOnAQuest} : Who cares either way man. I don't care about Obama having his foot on a desk during a call, nor do I care about Conway being on a couch. Don't get caught up in this media boondoggle it means nothing.", '>>{Egorse} : > He was criticized for that. It was a silly criticism because other presidents also have been photographed with their feet on the oval office desk.', ">>{GodHatestheJags} : It's hard to remember that far back when you're 15.", '>>{spazz720} : Google this sentence >president feet on desk Look at images', '>>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : But Obama wore a tan suit too! ^^/s', '>>{MolestedConservative} : I do. Kelly is disgusting for trying to flash a room full of men.', '>>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : What do you mean? Do you mean that the Washington Times specifically is irrelevant? If so why did you post a Washington Times article in the first place?', ">>{DPlaintiff} : Moonies ignoring the real story here - Obama looks cool and casual no matter what he's standing on.", '>>{treerat} : The wingnut media went gaga over his fist bump.', '>>{Willlll} : These are same people that act like the Obama kids were treated respectfully by the hillbilly media.', '>>{kevin3g} : The nerve of him soiling the furniture with his foot when he should be cleaning it. /s', '>>{_Apophis} : Google this sentence: >Strawberry vs papaya cat nipples Look at images then tell me what shows up.', ">>{yokablasta} : Right in time, WT. Wouldn't want Kellyanne's feet on the couch to go uncountered.", '>>{Esper21} : Seriously though... this is pretty much the level of intelligence of an average TD poster. Dumb as a fucking rock.'], ['>>{radiant_snowdrop} : What a joke. If they dislike the Democrats gun bills, then they need to acknowledge the issues with the Republican gun bills as well. The first called for research into psychological factors that lead to gun violence, and quite literally used the effects of violent video games as an example of what we need to research. The second bill wanted the FBI to be able to put together a case in 3 days. It takes a lot longer to put together a case than 3 days.', '>>{winstonsmith7} : The non Democratic bills would give people a chance to correct errors secret lists of "terrorists" AKA whoever the government names terrorists, factual basis or not. No accountability whatsoever. When Bush and Co. came up with this nonsense I was appalled, and with Obama I hoped it would be significantly changed. Well, yes. He\'s far worse than Bush ever was. Dems would rather have no gun legislation and make a fuss in Congress before having "their" agenda taken from them. It\'s about political hay and being seen to do something, even if nothing happens.', ">>{CurtlyCurlyAlex} : > he first called for research into psychological factors that lead to gun violence, and quite literally used the effects of violent video games as an example of what we need to research. Don't take our guns away from video games either, man! [We're not hurting anyone!](http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/12/study-finds-no-evidence-violent-video-games-make-children-aggres/)", '>>{Ainjyll} : The GOP\'s triumph of inserting the Constitutional due process was a joke. Three days is all that was allowed. I have a friend who happens to share a name with a man on the No Fly list. They look absolutely nothing alike. One is tall, thin and arabic. The other is short, stocky and African american. Regardless, it took him several months to get it all straightened out. So, don\'t let the hype fool you both sides are playing politics, but the GOP is the worse of the culprits. They put forth bills that wouldn\'t ever get voted for because of their obvious faults and now they get to sit back and say, "but we gave you a bill and you didn\'t want it". It\'s not about putting out a bill and saying take it or leave it. Compromise is key and until we begin to have it again, we won\'t see anything good from Congress.', '>>{winstonsmith7} : And what did the Democrats do? They are the ones who say that if one is on the suspect list they are terrorists, or as good as. The Republican bill wasn\'t enough, and the Democrat one nothing but "terror terror terror", which is precisely what Bush did to get us into Iraq. I despised fear mongering then and I do now. I don\'t care what party is behind it. It\'s reprehensible.', ">>{in_the_saddle_again} : > Compromise is key and until we begin to have it again, we won't see anything good from Congress. If your design is to dismantle a country and not run it an ineffective government is exactly your goal.", ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : >It takes a lot longer to put together a case than 3 days. They should already have a case if they think they should be barred. It shouldn't take more than three days for them to convince a judge with what they do have.", ">>{SistaSabuda} : Well yeah, it's not about gun control for safety, but removal of due process for total people control. These are the same people that say the second is for hunting; they are completely lying: >If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. The usurpers, clothed with the forms of legal authority, can too often crush the opposition in embryo. The smaller the extent of the territory, the more difficult will it be for the people to form a regular or systematic plan of opposition, and the more easy will it be to defeat their early efforts. Intelligence can be more speedily obtained of their preparations and movements, and the military force in the possession of the usurpers can be more rapidly directed against the part where the opposition has begun. In this situation there must be a peculiar coincidence of circumstances to insure success to the popular resistance. >The obstacles to usurpation and the facilities of resistance increase with the increased extent of the state, provided the citizens understand their rights and are disposed to defend them. The natural strength of the people in a large community, in proportion to the artificial strength of the government, is greater than in a small, and of course more competent to a struggle with the attempts of the government to establish a tyranny. But in a confederacy the people, without exaggeration, may be said to be entirely the masters of their own fate. Power being almost always the rival of power, the general government will at all times stand ready to check the usurpations of the state governments, and these will have the same disposition towards the general government. The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. If their rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress. How wise will it be in them by cherishing the union to preserve to themselves an advantage which can never be too highly prized! >It may safely be received as an axiom in our political system, that the State governments will, in all possible contingencies, afford complete security against invasions of the public liberty by the national authority. Projects of usurpation cannot be masked under pretenses so likely to escape the penetration of select bodies of men, as of the people at large. The legislatures will have better means of information. They can discover the danger at a distance; and possessing all the organs of civil power, and the confidence of the people, they can at once adopt a regular plan of opposition, in which they can combine all the resources of the community. They can readily communicate with each other in the different States, and unite their common forces for the protection of their common liberty. >The great extent of the country is a further security. We have already experienced its utility against the attacks of a foreign power. And it would have precisely the same effect against the enterprises of ambitious rulers in the national councils. If the federal army should be able to quell the resistance of one State, the distant States would have it in their power to make head with fresh forces. The advantages obtained in one place must be abandoned to subdue the opposition in others; and the moment the part which had been reduced to submission was left to itself, its efforts would be renewed, and its resistance revive. >We should recollect that the extent of the military force must, at all events, be regulated by the resources of the country. For a long time to come, it will not be possible to maintain a large army; and as the means of doing this increase, the population and natural strength of the community will proportionably increase. When will the time arrive that the federal government can raise and maintain an army capable of erecting a despotism over the great body of the people of an immense empire, who are in a situation, through the medium of their State governments, to take measures for their own defense, with all the celerity, regularity, and system of independent nations? The apprehension may be considered as a disease, for which there can be found no cure in the resources of argument and reasoning. >Alexander Hamilton December 26 1787", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : It is a precaution. Why do you think people are on the terror watchlist? I think it's fair to assume because they communicate with terrorists, as the Orlando shooter had. That doesn't mean they are guilty, but does the state have an interest in watching them? Yes. If there is truly no problem than they would be able to get a gun---as the Democrats bill says.", ">>{Glblwrmingisfak} : > Why do you think people are on the terror watchlist? Lots of reasons some of them valid, some of them not. Probably many of them are not and it can be merely association with someone else who is a terrorist or communicates with them. >as the Orlando shooter had But as I recall they removed him from the list because they really didn't have evidence to connect him to actual terrorism. >but does the state have an interest in watching them? Yes Sure, they can watch him. >If there is truly no problem than they would be able to get a gun---as the Democrats bill says. No. I would rather there be a process. Perhaps a due process where the FBI at least has some meaningful evidence that they can use to convince a judge. And that is pretty fucking minimal as far as that goes.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : American citizens comprise a very small amount of people on the list. A lot of the people on that list actually deserve to be on it. He was investigated three times. He should have remained on the list, and he should not have been able to get a gun. He was also only on the FBI's watchlist, not the No Fly List. If you are talking to terrorists, you should not have a gun. It's that simple. There is a process. You can contest the FBI's ruling in court. All these people would have been able to get a gun. The Republican bill only gives them three days. It is not enough time to make an individual case, so nothing would have changed.", ">>{MrWigglesworth2} : >Why do you think people are on the terror watchlist? Mistakes. Because they protested against a government agency and someone in that agency added them just to punish them. These things are quite frequent with these lists. >That doesn't mean they are guilty, but does the state have an interest in watching them? Yes. And *watching* them is fine. Actively taking away their rights isn't. >If there is truly no problem than they would be able to get a gun---as the Democrats bill says. Maybe. Someday. After they prove themselves innocent, rather than the government proving they're a threat. That is not acceptable. If the government wants to take away someones rights, its on the government to prove its warranted, not the other way around. As it is, the Republican proposal only required the government to show probable cause. That is not a high bar to clear. That's the same level it takes to get a search warrant. If the government doesn't already have enough evidence to demonstrate probable cause, then the person in question didn't belong on the damn list in the first place.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : You think people are on the terror watchlist because of mistakes? There are plenty of legitimate entries you don't hear about---because they're legitimate. Taking away the right to own a gun from people who are suspected of terrorism is absolutely ok. They have three days to put together a case. Talking to a terrorist is not illegal, associating with them isn't illegal---as Omar Mateen has shone us. There were so many red flags but he was still able to get a gun. He should not have been able to get a gun. And he did. He deserved to be on the list. He shouldn't have been taken off it either.", ">>{MrWigglesworth2} : >Three days is all that was allowed. >took him several months to get it all straightened out. That you actually think the latter somehow exposes a problem with the former is just embarrassing. If anything it just supports it. The entire point here is that it needs to be on the government to show why you should be on the list, not on you to show why you shouldn't be. If you think otherwise, you don't care about due process, period.", ">>{MrWigglesworth2} : >You think people are on the terror watchlist because of mistakes? [Loads of them.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Fly_List#Notable_cases) And some people are maliciously added. >They have three days to put together a case. They have three days to show ***probable cause.*** That's it. Probable cause is an extremely low bar to clear. If the government doesn't already have sufficient evidence to show probable cause, the person does not belong on the list in the first place.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Given that Omar Mateen had three investigations against him, and they still couldn't pin him with anything, it is not as easy as you make it sound. And Democrats agree with that, so they voted against it.", ">>{MrWigglesworth2} : They couldn't pin him with anything sufficient to arrest and convict him. You don't seem to understand that this does not mean they could not have demonstrated probable cause.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Well, they couldn't do it throughout three investigations. So I doubt three days would somehow be better. We are just going to have to agree to disagree on this issue.", ">>{Artificecoyote} : I think you are misunderstand wiggles worth. The FBI interviewed matteen three times and didn't have enough to formally charge him with anything. But the republican bill says the government has to show probable cause which is a lower bar legally. So if the repub bill was in place before the Orlando shooting, matteen might have been denied a gun or at least the purchase would've been on the FBI's radar. Basically the amount that the FBI needed to show to charge matteen/detain him is a lot more than what is needed for probable cause. I hope that helps your understanding.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I don't believe three days is enough time, and neither do the Democrats."]]

classify and reply

[">>{pw5a29} : because some people doesn't see big screen as a pull factor?", ">>{awake-at-dawn} : Donald Trump says 'miserable' wife Melania will move into the White House with him - eventually", ">>{jamiegandolf} : Lots of people love the 4s and 4 size. I know some people that still use them and not because they're poor either. I prefer the big + but that's just our individual preference.", '>>{kompr0mat} : They posted a PDF that we deserved to be able to read for ourselves. After months, thanks for at least releasing it', '>>{Uday_Trump} : Not enough gold plating for step-mom to move in yet. That kind of class takes time.', ">>{ScrewSnow} : As someone who went from a 6 to an SE, here's my reasoning. While the size doesn't seem like much, 4in phones make it much easier to reach all parts of the phone. My left thumb can reach the top right corner. Something that my 6 didn't have. My male pockets are deep, but I still prefer a smaller phone. The keyboard keys are close enough together that it's easy (and faster for me) to type on, but not so tiny that you struggle (Blackberry.) The 6s and SE share the same processor and back camera. The only thing worse on the SE is the front camera, and potentially, Force Touch. The front camera is still able to take relatively decent photos, and not many people care about Force Touch. The SE is $250 cheaper. A lot of people are on BYOD plans, having to shell out the full price of the phone. They have no option to pay $30 a month for the phone. Also, $18 a month for a phone is easier than $30 for some people as well. The battery life on the SE is so much better than the 6s. I can go almost two days on mine where my boyfriend can only go a day on his 6s. The SE is the design a lot of people love. Especially coming from a 5/5c/5S. The blockiness is incredibly comfortable. Some people hate the camera bump as well. The SE has way fewer problems than the 6s did. Battery issues plagued the 6s, but the SE didn't have any issues. The 7 peels, but if they used the same SE case, it wouldn't. Now, this is because Apple saw how the [5's body took damage](https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/iphone-5-scuffs-640x353.jpg) and fixed it for the most part. The 5s' shiny border around the screen ended up looking terrible after some use, so they went matte for the SE. ******* I would love for an SE to come out with next generation hardware. The perfect SE would have Force Touch and 128gb/256gb options. Apple didn't really expect the SE to do as well as it did, but there's a market for smaller phones (See: Galaxy S Mini series.)", ">>{CarmineFields} : No, they announced that Melania and Barron were special snowflakes who'd likely remain in New York and require a second set of secret Service guards.", '>>{greatcaffeine} : Even with small hands, it\'s easy to reach every corner of the iPhone SE screen with one hand. There\'s a reason Apple had to introduce the Reachability feature when they announced the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus. Aside from that, I think the shape also makes it a lot easier to hold. The iPhone 6, 6s, and 7 are all very slippery compared to the previous models. I\'ve had a couple close calls where my larger iPhones have almost slipped out of my hand, but I never had that problem with the 4" and smaller models.', '>>{AnAttractivePenguin} : Not really though? This is entirely up to personal opinion. The build quality and form factor of the SE is great, but the 7 has a better screen-to-body ratio.', '>>{redphan} : For me, one handed use on the SE is significantly better than a 4.7". I can reach all parts of the screen easily and comfortably on the SE. On a 4.7" it\'s a bit of a strain to touch some spots and a balancing act to get to the opposite upper corner. The SE has some straight advantages over the other iPhones too. It\'s the cheapest iPhone, gets better battery life than any 4.7" iPhone, and charges the fastest of any iPhone (fastest to 100% of any phone period). Also has a headphone jack, unlike the 7.', ">>{kiwisrkool002} : Errr... the Mirror. Aren't they the ones being sued by melania trump? Nice hit piece this one.", '>>{Mawontalk} : Sometimes, it seems that Chuck Todd has risen a few steps above his expected pay grade. Fake news is news created specifically to ***appear*** true. In this case, no one knows whether the information in the dossier is true or false. It may or may not be fake news. Buzzfeed did not publish the information presenting it as true - they carefully and clearly indicated that the truth was unknown.', ">>{SocialJustise} : It is a globally important primary source. I'm glad we got to see it. They didn't say it was 100 percent verified. I thought people liked transparency?", ">>{ian80} : Agree completely. I generally like Todd, but not sure what he is on about here. The dossier itself had become a story. It wasn't classified information. Why shouldn't it be published - as long as, like you say, it is made explicitly clear that the information contained was unsubstantiated.", '>>{OPs_Mom_Loves_Me} : Ha! The trumps are thin-skinned, they sue everyone who hurts their feelings.', '>>{mdm_} : I currently have a Galaxy S7 and am planning to switch to an SE in the near future. It will be my first iPhone. Mostly agree with your points, but I\'ll add: * The SE seems much better suited for working out and running because of it\'s size. I feel like I could get one of those arm bands for it and forget I\'m even carrying a phone * It\'s the most affordable iPhone, yet still seems to have better performance (perceived, at least) than my S7 * I don\'t really need a big phone. I\'ve had big phones and they\'re really awkward for most of the stuff I use a phone for, e.g. streaming music, texting my wife, grocery lists, email, news, calendar. I\'ve dropped my S7 many times because I was trying to use it one-handed and it slipped out of my hand. The main argument for big screens is games and video, but if I want to play games or watch video, I have numerous game consoles/handhelds (with better games, but I digress), a smart TV, and a tablet. * It\'s a classic design. It\'s like if Porsche brought out a new 911 "Classic" that looked like [this](http://911evolution.com/sites/default/files/styles/header_image_medium/public/media/Turbo_0/1986-Porsche-911-Turbo_edited.jpg?itok=ptEgyxV0) but had modern technology, safety features, infotainment systems, etc and cost 20% less than a current model 911. There would be a strong niche of people who would buy the shit out of that.', '>>{mmaireenehc} : Because different people have different tastes. You may think the difference between 4" and 4.7" is negligible, but to other people it\'s that difference that makes the phone more pocketable or ergonomic.', '>>{BrawndoTTM} : I mean, if you go down that road, you have absolutely no standing to complain about pizzagate.', ">>{HerMileHighness} : Link? Because I truly remember them stating that they didn't want Barron to have to change schools in the middle of the year.", '>>{HerMileHighness} : From your link: > When asked about the family’s relocation plans post inauguration Trump, 70, told reporters that he would immediately settle into the executive mansion and that Mrs.Trump and his youngest son, a fourth grader at a Manhattan prep school, would move “Very soon. After he’s finished with school,” according to McClatchy White House Correspondent\xa0Anita Kumar.\xa0 So, after the school year.', '>>{kompr0mat} : The people do like transparency. But what the people like, and the establishment *says* the people like, are two different things. case in point: [the tax returns](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jan/11/donald-trump/trump-wrong-reporters-are-only-ones-who-care-about/).', ">>{i_am_losing_my_mind} : You'd have a point if pizzagate had been compiled by a former MI6 agent and it's contents were presented to both the president-elect and current president during an intel briefing by US intel chiefs.", '>>{erikwithaknotac} : Remember when Obama would vacation in Hawaii, and conservatives threw a fit about how much it cost?', ">>{Dark_Fiber} : Size and price are big reasons why people prefer the SE over the larger iPhones. Depending the size of ones hands, mere inches means the difference between a phone meant for one handed use and a phone that needs to be used with two hands. Also, as I never use an iPhone without a case, a case would increase the size even more. I bought a 64GB SE back in May 2016 and upgraded from a 5s. For me it is the perfect size (you can use the phone one handed which comes in handy if your carrying say a briefcase in your other hand). It has the exact same dimensions as the 5 and 5s which means there was already a huge array of accessories that would fit it (including cheap accessories that were marked down in price or sold used for cheap, which allowed me to buy all of my Olloclip lenses made for the 5/5s cheap. It meant I could reuse my Spigen Tough Armor case that I had for my 5s that I love. It meant I could keep using my favorite Marware leather hip case which fits it perfectly. The SE has the same CPU/GPU and rear camera as the 6s (which actually performs a little better since it doesn't have to drive the same sized screen as the 6s.) The battery life was/is the best of any iPhone. It cost less than the the 6s/6s Plus. True the SE doesn't have Force Touch but as I never had it I don't miss it. It doesn't have the better front facing camera as the 6s/7 but as I don't take many selfies (I'm not a teenage girl) that doesn't matter. Don't get me wrong, there are times I would love to have a larger screen (like when my iPhone is docked in my car and I am using the GPS Navigation) but it's not worth the size tradeoffs to me.", '>>{HerMileHighness} : So, an unnamed source says they might reevaluate at the end of the school year and another source says they will definitely be moving. Hmm.', '>>{Lamargoodman} : I went from a Huawei P8 to a 5s and personally I find the size far more manageable , however the keyboard can often feel cramped compared to larger phones .', '>>{ian80} : I never complained about pizzagate :) I think you are missing an important distinction. "Hillary is leader of sex ring" and "Online conspiracists claim Hillary is leader of sex ring" are two completely different stories. The first is unsubstantiated falsehoods, the second is a true story that deserves to be told.', '>>{suomyn0na} : The SE is completely usable with 1 hand. The 7 is for the most part usable wth one hand, but not completely. Might be the case', '>>{BrainTheSwamp} : By that logic, Wikileaks is fake news. Both just released documents that were provided to them by high up sources. The double standard is staggering.', ">>{CarmineFields} : Okay? No one knows what's happening but right now Trump and his family are costing taxpayers a fortune including his adult sons' taxpayer-funded business trip to Uganda. All other first families moved when the new president took over. Chelsea Clinton, the Bush twins, Malia and Sasha. None of them made taxpayers pay to cover their demands.", ">>{HerMileHighness} : Well, I think it's pretty obvious that the kid is not exactly mainstream and I totally understand why they would be concerned about moving him in the middle of the school year. I realize everyone here hates his father, but come on, he's a ten year old with issues, likely autism. Can't we give the kid a break?", '>>{I_Hate_Nerds} : God this guy\'s an idiot. Fake news is verifiably false information presented as news. The Trump dossier is "unsubstantiated" but not necessarily false. There\'s a difference chuck.', ">>{Risley} : But just to be clear, NBC reported on nightly news that that document was not part of Trumps briefing, was included in the larger report in an annex to serve as a source for Clapper to show examples of how Russia might try to embarrass trump with disinformation (if trump asked to see some), was overall not found as credible, and the FBI is no longer investigating it. So yes, 4chan didn't do this, it was indeed obtained by McCain, and looked at by the FBI, but that's where this is appearing to end. I'm all for facts. But let's make sure we keep the record clean, so that when there is actual shit on trump, we have credibility to stand on.", '>>{CarmineFields} : No. No one gave Michelle Obama or even Sasha and Malia "a break". The trump family doesn\'t deserve snowflake status.', '>>{HerMileHighness} : Wait. Lots of military families stay at a home base while a parent is deployed for duty. The families choose if they drag the kids around.', '>>{kompr0mat} : If by appearing to end, you mean the original author of the report exposed, and investigation thrown into high gear, then sure. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-38591382 http://www.forbes.com/sites/richardbehar/2017/01/11/could-this-be-the-british-mi6-agent-behind-the-trump-fbi-memos/#2a054ce337da BTW Christopher Steele, the ex-MI6 intelligence officer, still widely seems to be highly regarded within the intel community.', ">>{tedsmitts} : It's now impossible to prove that Trump is not in fact a giant piss baby. Four years of the pissy fuhrer. Deny it all you like, it's out there, like Cameron's fucking a pig.", ">>{Risley} : This was said tonight, on tv, on NBC nightly news. I'm not making this up. Unless you think they are just lying now as well. They said the claims in the docs were not true and the FBI was done with it. So take it up with NBC if you dont believe me. >Intelligence agencies considered the claims relevant enough to brief both Mr Trump and President Obama last week. They specifically said this was false. So I dont know who is telling the BBC this.", ">>{twocannnsam} : Let's hope he moves out before he convinces her to move in.", '>>{ZachRyder19} : OK fair enough! I just saw a military mom on Facebook complaining about this. now look at me spouting off! I stand corrected.', '>>{HerMileHighness} : I guess we need an amendment to the constitution saying that the entire first family has to live in the White House then. Until then, they are free agents and get to make what they feel are the correct choices for their families. I would never expect someone to make their children make a move that would be traumatic and detrimental to there wellbeing. And when you say "no one" gave the past first children a break, that\'s complete hyperbole. *Some* people gave them a hard time, but certainly not many. Most people couldn\'t have cared less.', ">>{CarmineFields} : They didn't get to stay at their old schools, did they? Where was their break? Why does the right-wing lose its shit over Obama taking a Hawaiian vacation when they're fine with paying for Trump to fly back to Florida every single weekend and pay for a second secret service detail for the first snowflake family?", ">>{ShakeyBobWillis} : >She was always the highest quality that you'll ever find. What a weird way to compliment your wife. Aside from his one daughter he wants to fuck I'm not sure I've ever seen a genuine emotion out of him towards his family."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{kompr0mat} : They posted a PDF that we deserved to be able to read for ourselves. After months, thanks for at least releasing it', '>>{Mawontalk} : Sometimes, it seems that Chuck Todd has risen a few steps above his expected pay grade. Fake news is news created specifically to ***appear*** true. In this case, no one knows whether the information in the dossier is true or false. It may or may not be fake news. Buzzfeed did not publish the information presenting it as true - they carefully and clearly indicated that the truth was unknown.', ">>{SocialJustise} : It is a globally important primary source. I'm glad we got to see it. They didn't say it was 100 percent verified. I thought people liked transparency?", ">>{ian80} : Agree completely. I generally like Todd, but not sure what he is on about here. The dossier itself had become a story. It wasn't classified information. Why shouldn't it be published - as long as, like you say, it is made explicitly clear that the information contained was unsubstantiated.", '>>{BrawndoTTM} : I mean, if you go down that road, you have absolutely no standing to complain about pizzagate.', '>>{kompr0mat} : The people do like transparency. But what the people like, and the establishment *says* the people like, are two different things. case in point: [the tax returns](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jan/11/donald-trump/trump-wrong-reporters-are-only-ones-who-care-about/).', ">>{i_am_losing_my_mind} : You'd have a point if pizzagate had been compiled by a former MI6 agent and it's contents were presented to both the president-elect and current president during an intel briefing by US intel chiefs.", '>>{ian80} : I never complained about pizzagate :) I think you are missing an important distinction. "Hillary is leader of sex ring" and "Online conspiracists claim Hillary is leader of sex ring" are two completely different stories. The first is unsubstantiated falsehoods, the second is a true story that deserves to be told.', '>>{BrainTheSwamp} : By that logic, Wikileaks is fake news. Both just released documents that were provided to them by high up sources. The double standard is staggering.', '>>{I_Hate_Nerds} : God this guy\'s an idiot. Fake news is verifiably false information presented as news. The Trump dossier is "unsubstantiated" but not necessarily false. There\'s a difference chuck.', ">>{Risley} : But just to be clear, NBC reported on nightly news that that document was not part of Trumps briefing, was included in the larger report in an annex to serve as a source for Clapper to show examples of how Russia might try to embarrass trump with disinformation (if trump asked to see some), was overall not found as credible, and the FBI is no longer investigating it. So yes, 4chan didn't do this, it was indeed obtained by McCain, and looked at by the FBI, but that's where this is appearing to end. I'm all for facts. But let's make sure we keep the record clean, so that when there is actual shit on trump, we have credibility to stand on.", '>>{kompr0mat} : If by appearing to end, you mean the original author of the report exposed, and investigation thrown into high gear, then sure. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-38591382 http://www.forbes.com/sites/richardbehar/2017/01/11/could-this-be-the-british-mi6-agent-behind-the-trump-fbi-memos/#2a054ce337da BTW Christopher Steele, the ex-MI6 intelligence officer, still widely seems to be highly regarded within the intel community.', ">>{tedsmitts} : It's now impossible to prove that Trump is not in fact a giant piss baby. Four years of the pissy fuhrer. Deny it all you like, it's out there, like Cameron's fucking a pig.", ">>{Risley} : This was said tonight, on tv, on NBC nightly news. I'm not making this up. Unless you think they are just lying now as well. They said the claims in the docs were not true and the FBI was done with it. So take it up with NBC if you dont believe me. >Intelligence agencies considered the claims relevant enough to brief both Mr Trump and President Obama last week. They specifically said this was false. So I dont know who is telling the BBC this."], [">>{pw5a29} : because some people doesn't see big screen as a pull factor?", ">>{jamiegandolf} : Lots of people love the 4s and 4 size. I know some people that still use them and not because they're poor either. I prefer the big + but that's just our individual preference.", ">>{ScrewSnow} : As someone who went from a 6 to an SE, here's my reasoning. While the size doesn't seem like much, 4in phones make it much easier to reach all parts of the phone. My left thumb can reach the top right corner. Something that my 6 didn't have. My male pockets are deep, but I still prefer a smaller phone. The keyboard keys are close enough together that it's easy (and faster for me) to type on, but not so tiny that you struggle (Blackberry.) The 6s and SE share the same processor and back camera. The only thing worse on the SE is the front camera, and potentially, Force Touch. The front camera is still able to take relatively decent photos, and not many people care about Force Touch. The SE is $250 cheaper. A lot of people are on BYOD plans, having to shell out the full price of the phone. They have no option to pay $30 a month for the phone. Also, $18 a month for a phone is easier than $30 for some people as well. The battery life on the SE is so much better than the 6s. I can go almost two days on mine where my boyfriend can only go a day on his 6s. The SE is the design a lot of people love. Especially coming from a 5/5c/5S. The blockiness is incredibly comfortable. Some people hate the camera bump as well. The SE has way fewer problems than the 6s did. Battery issues plagued the 6s, but the SE didn't have any issues. The 7 peels, but if they used the same SE case, it wouldn't. Now, this is because Apple saw how the [5's body took damage](https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/iphone-5-scuffs-640x353.jpg) and fixed it for the most part. The 5s' shiny border around the screen ended up looking terrible after some use, so they went matte for the SE. ******* I would love for an SE to come out with next generation hardware. The perfect SE would have Force Touch and 128gb/256gb options. Apple didn't really expect the SE to do as well as it did, but there's a market for smaller phones (See: Galaxy S Mini series.)", '>>{greatcaffeine} : Even with small hands, it\'s easy to reach every corner of the iPhone SE screen with one hand. There\'s a reason Apple had to introduce the Reachability feature when they announced the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus. Aside from that, I think the shape also makes it a lot easier to hold. The iPhone 6, 6s, and 7 are all very slippery compared to the previous models. I\'ve had a couple close calls where my larger iPhones have almost slipped out of my hand, but I never had that problem with the 4" and smaller models.', '>>{AnAttractivePenguin} : Not really though? This is entirely up to personal opinion. The build quality and form factor of the SE is great, but the 7 has a better screen-to-body ratio.', '>>{redphan} : For me, one handed use on the SE is significantly better than a 4.7". I can reach all parts of the screen easily and comfortably on the SE. On a 4.7" it\'s a bit of a strain to touch some spots and a balancing act to get to the opposite upper corner. The SE has some straight advantages over the other iPhones too. It\'s the cheapest iPhone, gets better battery life than any 4.7" iPhone, and charges the fastest of any iPhone (fastest to 100% of any phone period). Also has a headphone jack, unlike the 7.', '>>{mdm_} : I currently have a Galaxy S7 and am planning to switch to an SE in the near future. It will be my first iPhone. Mostly agree with your points, but I\'ll add: * The SE seems much better suited for working out and running because of it\'s size. I feel like I could get one of those arm bands for it and forget I\'m even carrying a phone * It\'s the most affordable iPhone, yet still seems to have better performance (perceived, at least) than my S7 * I don\'t really need a big phone. I\'ve had big phones and they\'re really awkward for most of the stuff I use a phone for, e.g. streaming music, texting my wife, grocery lists, email, news, calendar. I\'ve dropped my S7 many times because I was trying to use it one-handed and it slipped out of my hand. The main argument for big screens is games and video, but if I want to play games or watch video, I have numerous game consoles/handhelds (with better games, but I digress), a smart TV, and a tablet. * It\'s a classic design. It\'s like if Porsche brought out a new 911 "Classic" that looked like [this](http://911evolution.com/sites/default/files/styles/header_image_medium/public/media/Turbo_0/1986-Porsche-911-Turbo_edited.jpg?itok=ptEgyxV0) but had modern technology, safety features, infotainment systems, etc and cost 20% less than a current model 911. There would be a strong niche of people who would buy the shit out of that.', '>>{mmaireenehc} : Because different people have different tastes. You may think the difference between 4" and 4.7" is negligible, but to other people it\'s that difference that makes the phone more pocketable or ergonomic.', ">>{Dark_Fiber} : Size and price are big reasons why people prefer the SE over the larger iPhones. Depending the size of ones hands, mere inches means the difference between a phone meant for one handed use and a phone that needs to be used with two hands. Also, as I never use an iPhone without a case, a case would increase the size even more. I bought a 64GB SE back in May 2016 and upgraded from a 5s. For me it is the perfect size (you can use the phone one handed which comes in handy if your carrying say a briefcase in your other hand). It has the exact same dimensions as the 5 and 5s which means there was already a huge array of accessories that would fit it (including cheap accessories that were marked down in price or sold used for cheap, which allowed me to buy all of my Olloclip lenses made for the 5/5s cheap. It meant I could reuse my Spigen Tough Armor case that I had for my 5s that I love. It meant I could keep using my favorite Marware leather hip case which fits it perfectly. The SE has the same CPU/GPU and rear camera as the 6s (which actually performs a little better since it doesn't have to drive the same sized screen as the 6s.) The battery life was/is the best of any iPhone. It cost less than the the 6s/6s Plus. True the SE doesn't have Force Touch but as I never had it I don't miss it. It doesn't have the better front facing camera as the 6s/7 but as I don't take many selfies (I'm not a teenage girl) that doesn't matter. Don't get me wrong, there are times I would love to have a larger screen (like when my iPhone is docked in my car and I am using the GPS Navigation) but it's not worth the size tradeoffs to me.", '>>{Lamargoodman} : I went from a Huawei P8 to a 5s and personally I find the size far more manageable , however the keyboard can often feel cramped compared to larger phones .', '>>{suomyn0na} : The SE is completely usable with 1 hand. The 7 is for the most part usable wth one hand, but not completely. Might be the case'], [">>{awake-at-dawn} : Donald Trump says 'miserable' wife Melania will move into the White House with him - eventually", '>>{Uday_Trump} : Not enough gold plating for step-mom to move in yet. That kind of class takes time.', ">>{CarmineFields} : No, they announced that Melania and Barron were special snowflakes who'd likely remain in New York and require a second set of secret Service guards.", ">>{kiwisrkool002} : Errr... the Mirror. Aren't they the ones being sued by melania trump? Nice hit piece this one.", '>>{OPs_Mom_Loves_Me} : Ha! The trumps are thin-skinned, they sue everyone who hurts their feelings.', ">>{HerMileHighness} : Link? Because I truly remember them stating that they didn't want Barron to have to change schools in the middle of the year.", '>>{HerMileHighness} : From your link: > When asked about the family’s relocation plans post inauguration Trump, 70, told reporters that he would immediately settle into the executive mansion and that Mrs.Trump and his youngest son, a fourth grader at a Manhattan prep school, would move “Very soon. After he’s finished with school,” according to McClatchy White House Correspondent\xa0Anita Kumar.\xa0 So, after the school year.', '>>{erikwithaknotac} : Remember when Obama would vacation in Hawaii, and conservatives threw a fit about how much it cost?', '>>{HerMileHighness} : So, an unnamed source says they might reevaluate at the end of the school year and another source says they will definitely be moving. Hmm.', ">>{CarmineFields} : Okay? No one knows what's happening but right now Trump and his family are costing taxpayers a fortune including his adult sons' taxpayer-funded business trip to Uganda. All other first families moved when the new president took over. Chelsea Clinton, the Bush twins, Malia and Sasha. None of them made taxpayers pay to cover their demands.", ">>{HerMileHighness} : Well, I think it's pretty obvious that the kid is not exactly mainstream and I totally understand why they would be concerned about moving him in the middle of the school year. I realize everyone here hates his father, but come on, he's a ten year old with issues, likely autism. Can't we give the kid a break?", '>>{CarmineFields} : No. No one gave Michelle Obama or even Sasha and Malia "a break". The trump family doesn\'t deserve snowflake status.', '>>{HerMileHighness} : Wait. Lots of military families stay at a home base while a parent is deployed for duty. The families choose if they drag the kids around.', ">>{twocannnsam} : Let's hope he moves out before he convinces her to move in.", '>>{ZachRyder19} : OK fair enough! I just saw a military mom on Facebook complaining about this. now look at me spouting off! I stand corrected.', '>>{HerMileHighness} : I guess we need an amendment to the constitution saying that the entire first family has to live in the White House then. Until then, they are free agents and get to make what they feel are the correct choices for their families. I would never expect someone to make their children make a move that would be traumatic and detrimental to there wellbeing. And when you say "no one" gave the past first children a break, that\'s complete hyperbole. *Some* people gave them a hard time, but certainly not many. Most people couldn\'t have cared less.', ">>{CarmineFields} : They didn't get to stay at their old schools, did they? Where was their break? Why does the right-wing lose its shit over Obama taking a Hawaiian vacation when they're fine with paying for Trump to fly back to Florida every single weekend and pay for a second secret service detail for the first snowflake family?", ">>{ShakeyBobWillis} : >She was always the highest quality that you'll ever find. What a weird way to compliment your wife. Aside from his one daughter he wants to fuck I'm not sure I've ever seen a genuine emotion out of him towards his family."]]

classify and reply

['>>{TheChinchilla914} : The attack on Jeff Sessions is part of the new McCarthyism', ">>{qounqer} : NBP's Quanell X: Trump Right About Dems Exploiting Black Votes", '>>{hearthneewb} : So can we add Breitbart to the long list of sites not eligible on the sub?', '>>{nycola} : Chaffetz, Nunes Statement on New FBI Files from Clinton Investigation - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform', ">>{Def2AllGaiznBlaks} : I guess it's time for Rapin' Bill to get on the ol' airplane and have another chitchat about golf and risotto with the attorney general", ">>{nycola} : Are these downvotes automatic? What's wrong QT's, you don't want the world to see an official statement put forth by the House Oversight Committee? Don't you love your government's checks and balances system? This is all thats left of democracy, sadly. MURCA", '>>{jokerZwild} : Because the GOP has done so much for them as well, right?', '>>{jeffinRTP} : Fake news, we all know that wapo is part of the MSM liberal agenda.', '>>{whose_that} : Hillary Clinton up 6 points over donald trump in the latest FOX News poll', ">>{Lazysleeper} : It's bad for Hillary so you get down votes. Don't you get how this sub works now. only Pro- Hillary stuff. get with the program.", ">>{pinballwiz} : Yeah, the same Chaffetz who: * Conducted all the Benghazi hearing while admitting that he voted to cut the funding for embassy security and his own party members admitted the hearings were politically motivated * displayed a chart he claimed was taken from Planned Parenthood's annual report, but sources confirm the claim the chart was actually taken from Americans United for Life chart data that was deliberately manipulated using questionable dual-axis charting methodologies * Totally dismissed the Nobel Peace award because President Obama had been awarded it. Sounds like a great guy!", ">>{coffee_dude08} : For her to be up 6 in a Fox poll probably means she's really up by 10.", ">>{rdevaughn} : He lied to Congress. This is absurd. The argument that he didn't lie rests on construing the phrase 'in the course of' to mean something other than 'during,' which is incredibly disingenuous.", '>>{MediaTimes} : The First Week Of Early Voting Bodes Well For Democrat Jon Ossoff', '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Both FBI and State on Monday denied any "quid pro quo." "The FBI determined that one such email was classified at the Secret level," FBI said Monday in a statement. "A senior State Department official requested the FBI re-review that email to determine whether it was in fact classified or whether it might be protected from release under a different FOIA exemption. A now-retired FBI official, who was not part of the subsequent Clinton investigation, told the State Department official that they would look into the matter. Having been previously unsuccessful in attempts to speak with the senior State official, during the same conversation, the FBI official asked the State Department official if they would address a pending, unaddressed FBI request for space for additional FBI employees assigned abroad." http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/17/politics/hillary-clinton-server-patrick-kennedy-quid-pro-quo/index.html Expert grapher Chaffetz punk\'d again', '>>{redroguetech} : > you don\'t want the world to see an official statement put forth by the House Oversight Committee? Why the fuck would you think that? I mean, this is from Rep. Chaffetz of the House Oversight Committee. That in itself would be enough for people to say "Nothing to see; move along."', '>>{redroguetech} : ... I\'m confused. Are you saying those who are actually think it\'s somehow relevant as "bad" for Clinton are downvoting? Or are you saying that those who are smart and/or rational enough to know that it literally has nothing at all to do with Clinton are downvoting? I mean, are you suggesting any story irrelevant to Clinton gets downvoted?', ">>{cajunrajing} : Breitbart Effect = Credibility - 99.5% How is this able to be posted again? Isn't it reposting the same link?", '>>{heelspider} : How does referencing McCarthyism make it okay for Sessions to lie under oath?', '>>{redroguetech} : Are you being serious? You\'re suggesting that the chair of the House Oversight Committee fabricating a false story for personal political gain is representative of "car[ing] deeply for his country"?', ">>{paraconformity} : Donald Trump would know, he is literally the protégé of Joseph McCarthy's protégé, Roy Cohn.", '>>{Izor28} : Deja vu. I remember these stories coming out in the 2016 election. Its almost like they cant comprehend that democrats tend to early vote more than Republicans. But their base seems to love these fake news stories so whatever gets them clicks', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Let me get this straight - the only benefit the state department could have had is to make the email public and for this they will try to 'bribe' the FBI?", ">>{verbose_gent} : This guy is going to win plain and simple. I live in Chicago and am familiar with who he is. I have never heard anything about whoever he is running against. I'm sure I can't even imagine how familiar people in the actual district are with him.", '>>{Shiba-Shiba} : Crap! McCarthyism is Government driven, like the attacks on scientists from the Climate Change Denialists in power under Trump & co..', '>>{Glitch198} : I am so glad we are at a point in our country when the public is against oversight of our government.', ">>{NotTheRealKenM} : Well, isn't the other side splitting their vote between a bunch of candidates? Then in the runoff presumably they will consolidate on the winner? Also, early voting tends to favor Democrats, right? It would be great if he could take the seat, but I don't think it's anywhere near a sure thing.", ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : If Clinton said it, it's a lie. If a Clinton supporter said it, its wrong. Hmmm, being brainless is easy.", ">>{TotallyLiberal} : Nope but I'm sure there will be at least 4-5 people whining in the comments for it to be removed every time it's posted", ">>{hearthneewb} : Well when a site is owned by one of the worst human beings to walk the earth and its filled with conspiracy theories or things warped to the point they're no longer credible its kinda worth campaigning against its removal.", '>>{whose_that} : It means Donald is fucked. I hope he takes the GOP down with him.', '>>{syncopator} : Really? An attorney offering up what proves to be false information outside the scope of the question he was asked *while interviewing for the job of Attorney General* is somehow "McCarthyism"? GTFO.', '>>{conservativeliberals} : This is good for Donnie, he is plating 3d twister!', '>>{morvus_thenu} : you might call him an expert at both the baseless smear attack and general fear-mongering. Notice me, senpai! Mr. Cohn would be proud of his work.', ">>{seanosul} : > Nope but I'm sure there will be at least 4-5 people whining in the comments for it to be removed every time it's posted I'm one of those. They should ban it or unban the liberal sites for balance. Why is there is a Red State but no Daily Kos? Why is Breittard allowed but the New Civil Rights movement is not?", '>>{ShakeyBobWillis} : Oh look...Breitbart. \\*downvote\\*', '>>{fredjonez} : AMONG REPUBLICANS Who would you rather have as the Republican Party’s presidential nominee? Donald Trump 48% Someone else 51%', '>>{redroguetech} : Nobody oversees the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.', ">>{bluexy} : Ossoff doesn't have an FBI investigation that can cost him 10 percentage points in the week before the election, at least.", '>>{NateGrey} : Trump Supporter - "This is a good thing".', '>>{RidleyScotch} : >This guy is going to win plain and simple. Have we not learned this phrase has no meaning in American politics anymore', ">>{dubslies} : Fwiw, special elections can have funky results because they are usually much lower turnout, leaving the candidate with the most energy/resources behind them favored. Given that unpopular incumbent presidents tend to suck the energy out of their party in midterm elections, and that Trump has lit a fire under Democrats, it's not impossible that Ossoff wins. He has a ton of support, both in terms of volunteers, media attention and money. On the other hand, we're talking about a district that Republicans have been regularly winning by blowout margins (60% or more), and while Hillary almost won the district, it still might be better to think Ossoff will come close but ultimately not win just due to how conservative the district usually is. I have my hopes but probably best not to get them too high.", ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : Removal of classification means the information is no longer illegal to have anywhere but legally approved locations. So, if the information was in an email, someone put it there illegally, sent it illegally and anyone possessing that email was doing so illegally. So, no, the idiotic assertion that the only benefit was the ability to make it public basically requires everyone to ignore the entire point of the FBI investigation. To determine if classified information was mishandled. But apparently despite both state and the FBI being aware of this particular piece of information and discussing a horse trade to unclassify it, nobody is to blame for it being present in an email. None of which really matters, as quid pro quo doesn't require some objective level of benefit, just that the party recieving it finds it beneficial in some way. Still struggling with basic definitions I see.", '>>{hobbes305} : According to the official propaganda arm of the Trump campaign. aka: breitbart.com', ">>{TotallyLiberal} : Bannon is one of the worst human beings to walk the earth? That's pretty intense.", '>>{jokerZwild} : Funny how the only thing people can find is Abe Lincoln but nothing current. Guess I should have clarified.', '>>{paraconformity} : Wapo lets shitty conservative sycophants write dumb editorials telling their side of the story. This is one of those.', '>>{HiImAConservative} : Early voting always tends to favor the democratic candidate. That being said, it looks like Ossoff has a real chance here, if he can avoid a runoff.', '>>{qounqer} : Lol there are like 4 articles on the front page from Vox.', '>>{wesswll} : Fox News is just who paid for the poll. It was actually conducted jointly by Anderson Robbins Research and Shaw & Company Research (it says this on the first page of the poll people). FiveThirtyEight [gives these pollsters a rating of A](http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/) , and actually lists them as having a mean-reverted bias of +0.4 towards the Democratic side.', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > Removal of classification means the information is no longer illegal to have anywhere but legally approved locations. The email was retroactively classified aka wasn't marked - nobody gets in trouble for unmarked classified material. Just ask Thomas Drake or Comey himself.", '>>{qounqer} : CommieVox- Basic Economics centered around scarcity are racist.', '>>{fredjonez} : Still 6 points is pretty big. It solidifies the average of the last few polls of being about 6-7% and if you look at the battle ground polls, they reflect this lead.', '>>{winstonjpenobscot} : Thankfully this tool is too stupid to realize that Trump\'s unfounded "wiretapping" allegation was sucking the oxygen out of the Sessions perjury thing. It was ^this ^close to being out of the national discussion. Good job scoring on your own goal!', ">>{Sports-Nerd} : You can't take off the metaphorical (well in this case quite literal) campaign hat and put on your senator hat and just pretend you are two different people.", ">>{sanspri} : and he's only down single digits. a shudder courses through the Clinton camp", '>>{fredjonez} : Not really, 6 points is a big lead when you have several other polls that not only back up the lead, but show battle ground states moving rapidly toward Clinton. They are probably happy but vigilant.', '>>{verbose_gent} : Not like Clinton which I never said, like in 2008 with Obama.', '>>{BuyPepe} : > literally has nothing at all to do with Clinton What? This is very relevant to Clinton and current politics.', '>>{Bab2385} : Was it retroactively classified, or not properly marked? Because those are NOT the same thing.', '>>{TheChinchilla914} : So doesnt that essentially disqualify any sitting senator who publicly supported a candidate from doing senate-related work? This really is one hell of a witch-hunt from the party of sore losers', ">>{fdfgdfgggggf} : If they lied about it under oath? Yes. That's the issue here. If they lied about it under oath AND are incharge of essentially investigating themselves? Yes.", '>>{Mawontalk} : The author of the piece conveniently leaves out the question that Sessions was responding to when he lied, which contains the critical "in the course of" phrase. Sessions had the opportunity to correct his mistake in the time between the hearings and the confirmation vote, and he never said a thing.', ">>{Bab2385} : Again, was it retroactively classified or not properly marked? If it were information that the State Department generated, they get to make the call. If it was generated at another agency, how they feel about the classification status doesn't fucking matter.", ">>{sanspri} : > Not really, 6 points is a big lead single digits are single digits. he's out polling her on honesty, terrorism. going to come down to swing states, a barn burner unless Hillary is indicted. electoral college should be apportioned, not winner take all", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : It was upclassified by the FBI and generated by the state department in an unclassified form', '>>{Yoru_no_Majo} : You\'re not familiar with GA-06 if you think he\'s going to win "plain and simple." The district is extremely red, Tom Price (corrupt as he is) won re-election by 30% of the vote. I\'m not saying Ossof won\'t win, but I consider the most likely scenario being that he wins the first round of voting, but by under 50%, then narrowly loses in the second round because his opponent has an "R" by his name. Of course, it\'s possible he wins, but that\'ll require a surge in turnout among blue voters in possibly two rounds of voting. While there are some promising signs, it will require blue voters to turn out at extremely high rates. If a relatively small percentage of potential blue voters stay home - either because they think he doesn\'t have a chance, or because they assume he\'s won, he\'ll lose.', ">>{Bab2385} : I really don't think you understand what I'm saying. I realize the emails were generated in the State Department, I'm talking about the information in those emails. The FBI doesn't have the authority to upclassify anything, only the originating agencies can do that. I can see an argument if it was retroactively classified. But if it was not properly marked, that means it was classified at the time it was sent. And if they're arguing about it and trying to have the classification removed, that means the information was not generated at the Department of State.", ">>{Grizzly_Corey} : Nice try, those sore losers are trying to ensure that people don't lie under oath. I know, novel idea.", ">>{verbose_gent} : You seem to recognize these arent normal times, so I'm sure you're just being overly cautious. Thing is, I'm not a news anchor or anything. I'm just some asshole on the internet so I don't have any social or political responsibility here. With the way things are in this specific climate, I'd put my life savings on it.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > The FBI doesn't have the authority to upclassify anything, only the originating agencies can do that. This is incorrect, other agencies can raise objections and upclassify information on their own. There is no central classification agency so agencies can either get their classification disputes settled by going to another agency (last time they went to the CIA) or argue with each other and let it slide. Retroactive marking can be done by any OCA if they happen to have access to the information themselves.", '>>{cookiemawo} : And there have been no debates yet and he has spent $0 on advertising so far.', ">>{notjabba} : And if she's up 10 it's really more like 15 because she knows how to focus the fight in swing states and has a ground game to get people to the polls. Trump is too busy staring at himself in the mirror to actually run a campaign.", ">>{fredjonez} : It was basically a tie with Obama and Romney during the summer. When people really start paying attention and realize that not only is Trump an actual candidate, but out of his mind, it won't really be a close election. We are already seeing huge movements in swing states toward Clinton, and close results in solid red states. Six points nationally would translate to a large margin in the general. We have a long way to go, but I just don't see how it swings the other direction with Trump hated so much. Also terrorism seems to favor Clinton, Trump keeps screwing up every chance he has to respond and the polls are reflecting that. As far as honesty, he is barely out polling her, anbd I don't suspect that lasts long.", ">>{Sports-Nerd} : His excuse was that he didn't meet with the Russian ambassador in context of the campaign, which is what he says he thought the question was asking. What I'm saying that there is no way to separate the two jobs, unless Jeff Sessions has an identical twin, he is still just one person. It has nothing to do with the ability of him to do senate related work, he can still do it, but he can't mislead or lie about it. Even if he is not working on campaign stuff with the Russian ambassador, he is still apart of the trump campaign. If I'm a doctor, just because I'm off work doesn't mean I'm not a doctor.", ">>{OmiSan13} : He has spent $0 because he doesnt have the money. Doesn't matter if you can win the Kentucky derby if you don't have a horse. Don't get your hopes up on the debates. A general election debate isnt a dick measuring contest like the republican debates.", '>>{redroguetech} : >This is very relevant to Clinton How? >and current politics. Not denying that. Clearly, the entire story is politically motivated, created in whole by Rep. Chaffetz.', ">>{Brady_55} : I have to admit, that I was never a big fan of the electoral college. Today, I am glad at the foresight our founding fathers had when they made the electoral college. A 6 point lead is an electoral landslide. We can't let the orange man make it to the White House.", ">>{HiImAConservative} : It's definitely not a sure thing. However, that being said, he has a real shot here. As you said yourself, Republicans are splitting their vote between a bunch of candidates. And there certainly is discontent with Trump in this district. In addition to this, Ossoff has raised nearly 3 million where your standard dem candidate for this district usually raises around 10,000. The way I see it is he has a really good chance of winning if he can avoid a run-off. I don't see him winning in a head to head vs a republican.", '>>{liliIllill} : > Early voting always tends to favor the democratic candidate. not in this district', ">>{wesswll} : > single digits are single digits. This is very disingenuous. The last President to win the election with a double digit margin was Reagan with his landslide over Mondale in '84. Clinton winning the election with a 6 point margin would represent only the second time in the last 5 elections that the winning margin even topped 4 points.", '>>{whose_that} : I doubt they even know how to play chess. Too complicated. "What do you mean the horsie moves in an L?!"', ">>{HiImAConservative} : Do you have any evidence of that assertion?, I don't say that in a confrontational way, but if you want to make a claim that this district in particular bucks a well known national trend you'll need to provide some evidence.", '>>{Piscator629} : This is a surprise opinion hit piece from the Wapo.', '>>{VanTil} : > nobody gets in trouble for unmarked classified material And whoever believes that has never read a classification guide before. Sending out classified information without marking it appropriately is a felony.', '>>{ivsciguy} : Interestingly, there are experts on certain subjects that work for an airline 90% of the time, but the FAA 10% of the time. Most of them do wear literal FAA hats because they are under different legal rights and responsibilities when they are working on an FAA project.', '>>{Bab2385} : From [Comey](https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system): >FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”). So no, the FBI did not upclassify anything.', ">>{preserved_fish} : Does anyone else remember when Ann Coulter, Trump's biggest fan, published that book in defense of McCarthy?", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : >And whoever believes that has never read a classification guide before. So name ONE person in history of government who has been successfully prosecuted over unmarked or unknown classified material. Should be easy for you. >Sending out classified information without marking it appropriately is a felony. First, this information was SENT to her. Second, she is an OCA, she can determine classification for any material generated within her department. Using one's own authority is not a felony under any law.", ">>{whose_that} : >He hasn't even started on her yet! For the 112th time.", '>>{coffee_dude08} : I suspect that Hillary will dominate the superficial, no-substance Donnie in the debates.', '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : From the DoD >Every classified document shall show on the first page, title page, or front cover (hereafter referred to as “the face of the document”), the originating DoD Component and office and the date of the document’s origin. This information shall be clear enough to allow someone receiving the document to contact the preparing office if issues or questions about the classification arise." >PORTION MARKS. Every classified document shall show, as clearly as is possible, which information in it is classified and at what level." http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001_vol2.pdf Marking them on review is what I am referring to as upclassifying, you may call it retroactive markings as well. The email didn\'t meet the DoD standard which is why it was in dispute.', '>>{Bab2385} : >Second, she is an OCA, she can determine classification for any material generated within her department. Yes, this is true. But since the State Department was trying to argue about the classification status, this information was **NOT** generated by the State Department.', ">>{dyzo_blue} : Trump supporters don't even know what an L is.", ">>{VanTil} : let's not forget that (C) and (S) were headers on some of her emails. But those are meaningless, right? ;) >So name ONE person in history of government who has been successfully prosecuted over unmarked or unknown classified material. Should be easy for you. [Not sure if you're a troll or just dense](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798)", '>>{Negative_Clank} : Literally 8 years of unabashed obstructionism. You wanna play the game?', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > was NOT generated by the State Department. Let's even assume it's true because I haven't read anything saying otherwise. The information was not marked as classified when it was SENT TO Clinton, she is in no way responsible if the agency who generated the information decided not to mark it.", ">>{dyzo_blue} : And if she's up by 15, she's really up by 20.", ">>{KleptocracyII} : I don't like Sessions but if the situation was reversed and it was a democratic administration being asked these type of questions I would want the same thing. A special prosecutor. Expecting him to resign at this point isn't right. If he resigns he will more than likely disappear from the investigation.I'd love to see Sessions under oath answering a special prosecutors questions. Letting a republican congress handle it is lunacy.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : >Every classified document shall show on the first page, title page, or front cover (hereafter referred to as “the face of the document”), the originating DoD Component and office and the date of the document’s origin. This information shall be clear enough to allow someone receiving the document to contact the preparing office if issues or questions about the classification arise." >PORTION MARKS. Every classified document shall show, as clearly as is possible, which information in it is classified and at what level." http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001_vol2.pdf Portion markings are only relevant if the headers are marked. Also frm the FBI files >Clinton identified a “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer (inserted in the document by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked if the “(C)” related to the “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer.', '>>{Writerhaha} : Check out his appearance on the most recent episode of Pod Save America. Comes off as well spoken and fairly moderate.', '>>{brunnock} : Oh, good. Most of the folks that have voted are [in their 60s](https://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/848008061709168640/photo/1). I was afraid that younger kids might start voting and actually make a difference.', '>>{whose_that} : They should, considering they have it stamped on their foreheads.', ">>{Bab2385} : This argument again. Firstly, the DoS is not the DoD. Secondly, the [SF 312](http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/HRC-classified-NDA1.pdf), that everyone signs when they get their security clearance doesn't say that. Markings do NOT negate classification status. It only makes it difficult to prosecute when there are no markings. >As used in this Agreement, classified information is marked or unmarked classified information, including oral communications, that is classified under the standards of Executive Order 13526, or under any other Executive order or statute that prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of information in the interest of national security; and unclassified information that meets the standards for classification and is in the process of a classification determination as provided in sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4(e) of Executive Order 13526, or under any other Executive order or statute that requires protection for such information in the interest of national security", ">>{whose_that} : >I'm donating my Wow subscription money to a pretend billionaire! Who will match me?", '>>{sanspri} : > This is very disingenuous. The last President to win the election with a double digit margin These are polls. not the election', '>>{Aldebaran135} : Mr. Ossoff, you just won a plurality in the primary. "I know."', '>>{TheGoldenLight} : https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/848200288863432704 Day 5 of in-person early voting in GA-6 is D 51 R 29 Over all, D 54 R 30 with 8110 ballots accepted Still early, but trends are steady http://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8VpZhaXcAAElTW.jpg http://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8VpZhcXcAA13lx.jpg Check the graphs which include data from prior years.', '>>{violentintenttoday} : Or that means pre nomination polling is pretty much useless.', ">>{violentintenttoday} : I like how you don't like it when you think it cheats you, but when it favors Hillary it's A-OK. That's why there's never any real reform in this country despite the tools for doing so are written into the constitution.", ">>{Bab2385} : This argument isn't even about Her. This is about her employees trying to get the classification removed from something she sent/or received.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Agencies regularly dispute classification, it won't be even news if she wasn't sent that information and ignorant people pretending she would have been held liable for it", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : You missed this from the NDA >(3) Basis for liability. > A party to the SF 312, SF 189, or SF 189-A may be liable for disclosing "classified information" only if he or she knows or reasonably should know that: (i) the marked or unmarked information is classified, or meets the standards for classification and is in the process of a classification determination; and (ii) his or her action will result, or reasonably could result in the unauthorized disclosure of that information. **In no instance may a party to the SF 312, SF 189 or SF 189-A be liable for violating its nondisclosure provisions by disclosing information when, at the time of the disclosure, there is no basis to suggest, other than pure speculation, that the information is classified or in the process of a classification determination.** http://www.archives.gov/isoo/training/standard-form-312.html And you missed this from the EO by OBama Section 1.1. Classification Standards. (a) Information may be originally classified under the terms of this order only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) an original classification authority is classifying the information; https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information Since the material was not endorsed by an OCA, nobody could be held responsible for not treating it as such', '>>{Brady_55} : I never thought it cheated anybody. I just never liked it personally. Now I do, because Cheeto Jesus is that dangerous.', ">>{Bab2385} : We're not talking about liability here. We're talking about having the classification removed. I'm not arguing that her liability is greatly diminished without markings. I'm saying that the State Department cannot decide the classification status of information generated by other agencies. Even if they don't agree with it, if they aren't the owning agency, they are responsible for handling it at the classification status that the owning agency determines.", ">>{TheGoldenLight} : Current early voting results have Ossof with >50% of the vote. If he can keep that going and end with more than half the votes there won't be a runoff vote, he'll just win outright. Also past results from this district indicate that he is outperforming expected early voting results", '>>{slaysia} : I believe the D 54 R 30 are percentages? So 54% dem | 30% repub', ">>{wesswll} : Alright, well only looking at polls, /u/GaryGnu1979 has already shown that a 6 point margin is higher than Obama's over Romney at this point in the election. I will add that on 6/29/12, Obama led the RCP average by 3.8 points (he won the election by 3.9 points). If we look even farther back, we can see that at this point in 2008 the polls were >Gallup 6/30 - 7/2 Obama +4 >Rasmussen 6/29 - 7/1 Obama +5 >CNN 6/26 - 6/29 Obama +5 >Pew Research 6/18 - 6/29 Obama +8 On 6/29/08, Obama led the RCP average by 7.1 points (won the election by 7.2 points) To be fair, this was before the housing crash really peaked (the major banks failing in late July/early August and collapsed in September IIRC) , and that undoubtedly played a role in the election, so let's look back at this point in 2004 >Gallup 6/9 - 6/30 Bush +1 >NBC/WSJ 6/25 - 6/28 Bush +1 >CBS News/NY Times 6/23 - 6/27 Bush +1 >ARG 7/1 - 7/3 Kerry +3 On 6/29/04, Bush led the RCP average by 2.0 points (won the election by 2.4 points). So over the past 3 elections (I couldn't find the polls from 2000), we can see that not only have the margin between RCP averages at this point been remarkably close to the final margins (off by only 0.1, 0.1, and 0.4 respectively, but also that even looking at polling on at this point in those elections, a 6 point Hillary lead is still the second most comfortable of any election since at least Bush v. Gore.", '>>{sanspri} : look at all the polls you want. this is trump vs. Clinton, son. there is no modern precedent', ">>{C6O1999} : They should considering they're going to be taking one in November.", '>>{GoTBRays162} : Honest question. Why would early voting favor Democrats. Most people that vote early are old people who tend to vote Republican', ">>{Bab2385} : Please refer to my other comments regarding the liability- as I am not disputing that. I'm talking about if the information was classified at the time it was sent, the lack of markings does NOT negate the classification status.", ">>{moose_testes} : It doesn't matter so much if the Republican vote is split, so long as all Republicans combine for >50%. The special election is a jungle primary, so if no candidate hits 50% then the top two candidates go to a run-off.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > the lack of markings does NOT negate the classification status. The status was not known at the time hence no issue of liability', '>>{_sillymarketing} : Not as true in the South. Lots of Black Churches organize their constituents in bus pickups and drop offs. Besides Mississippi, I think Georgia is top 3 for Black population and regular church attendance. Democrats are scared, I could easily see them gathering energy for early votes.', ">>{C6O1999} : He has spent $0 on advertising because he doesn't have any money son.", ">>{Bab2385} : Again. You keep referring to liability, and that isn't what I'm talking about. Was the information retroactively classified, or not properly marked? I said, I could see his argument if it was classified after the fact. If it was classified at the time it was sent, he doesn't get to make the call about the classification status. I keep repeating this and I feel like you're being willfully obtuse to the point I am making.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > I'm saying that the State Department cannot decide the classification status of information generated by other agencies. They can dispute it which is what they were doing here. http://www.salon.com/2016/02/29/state_dept_wins_dispute_over_clinton_email_on_north_korea/", ">>{C6O1999} : He has spent $0 on advertising because he doesn't have any money son.", ">>{C6O1999} : When the numbers keep going in the same direction or keep coming in at the same spread, it's no longer +/- 3 anymore. It's just 6. She's winning by 6 with a lot of election left to go.", '>>{Adama0001} : Ha! I knew bussing was true. How dare they legally vote as a group in their given district! /s', ">>{Bab2385} : That isn't unclassifying it. That's lowering the classification, which is **not** what Kennedy requested.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Again, it wasn't marked from what I read. It was not classified at the time it was sent.", ">>{dyzo_blue} : Hillary supporters can't be bigots. In order to be a bigot, you need to possess two traits. The first is privilege: A structural, institutional, and social advantage. Trump supporters occupy positions of bigot privilege, even when they are disadvantaged in other ways. Second, you also have to have power: the ability, backed up by Trump supporters, to be a strong social influencer, with greater leeway when it comes to what you do, where, and how.", ">>{dudeguyy23} : A six point lead in GE polls in June is huge. It's still fluid, but I guarantee you Clinton is happier than Trump right now.", '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : Wait wait you\'re just messing around, right? You\'re not serious? A bigot is anyone who dislikes another person due to their beliefs. There is no "privilege" requirement to be a piece of shit. There are just as many pretentious Hillary supporters as Donald supporters.', ">>{Bab2385} : I'm done with this conversation. You seem to not understand that markings have no bearing on classification status, only liability.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : They can request either of those things which is what I am pointing out.', '>>{dyzo_blue} : [m8 pls, im just fucking with you](http://www.dailydot.com/via/reverse-racism-doesnt-exist/)', '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : And we are talking about liability here, classification status can change based on many things but the conversation is relevant only regards to Clinton and her emails.', '>>{whatnowdog} : The church voting normally happens if the voting is open on Sunday. The Red States cut Sunday voting out. Our state of NC even cut out the first Saturday and I think the Saturday before the election was open only until maybe 1pm.', '>>{violentintenttoday} : You realize no one is going to take you as anything but a nutter by saying "cheto jesus" right? I mean I just assume anyone who says any of those things, $hillary, Bernout, tRump, or any of that is a complete asshole', '>>{turdovski} : Yep. A post about politics made by politicians.... Downvoted.', ">>{Brady_55} : Hold the hyperbole buddy. I'm poking fun at him using a funny name. Donald trump is a danger to this country. Better? Don't want to offend you, you know? I'm aware how thin-skinned trump supporters are.", '>>{violentintenttoday} : That\'s not what hyperbole is and the "funny names" generally aren\'t as funny as you think they are. Generally they work inside their assigned circlejerk, but when you come out of that circlejerk and start flinging them around hoping for the same effect, the real effect is to make it look like you\'ve lost touch with what color the sky is in the world the rest of us live in.', ">>{thegreatgazoo} : It would be be nice if he actually lived in the district. He lives in the 5th district, not the sixth. He is also coming under fire for exaggerating his 'national security expert' claims in that he only had a security clearance for 5 months instead of 5 years.", '>>{Uncle_Bill} : Who do you think asked Secretary Kennedy to seek reclassification? That is the nut here, who initiated the action?', '>>{Uncle_Bill} : I received no classified information on my server. -HRC Easiest way to make that so is to declassify everything....', ">>{Brady_55} : You realize no one is going to take you as anything but a nutter.. Is most definitely hyperbole, considering I have plenty of civil discourse with many people on a daily basis on here. Learn the definition. And It humors me. Cheeto Jesus is funny as hell. But I'm aware that calling trump names offends you. I'm sorry, I don't want to offend you mr Anti-PC. I'll cut back on the funny names.", '>>{whatnowdog} : This is also not normal because there is no incumbent. I hope the numbers stay high for him and he wins in the first round. Maybe Democrats learned their lesson and realize not voting means something.', '>>{violentintenttoday} : It\'s really not hyperbole. When someone comes in and starts talking about $hillary, do you think "Hey, I\'ll bet this person has some well reasoned and informed opinion" or do you say, here\'s comes some Trump nut?', ">>{verbose_gent} : That national security hit job was completely made up when I saw it yesterday. It was a false claim by the publication that attributed something to him that he never actually said. Complete bullshit. This is just opposition. It's a smear campaign. Even if it was true, the false claim isn't even any sort of big deal. It's not even a little deal. It's just fake outrage to sway voters against him.", ">>{coffeespeaking} : Not true. Republicans are traditionalists who think voting should happen on voting day. They are are resentful of change, and probably don't think their vote will be counted if it isn't done on election day. There can be more obstacles in getting Democrat voters to the polls, such as childcare, rides, time off from work. Democrats are much more likely to avail themselves of the longer poll access. This is why the GOP loves to shorten polling times, it disenfranchises voters of limited means.", '>>{9kokonotsu} : I am fed up with the ridiculous amount of censorship and voter manipulation here so I made my own subreddit clone: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Redacted/', '>>{NeverThrowawayUSA} : 3 hours after being posted, 39 points, 63% upvoted. This sub is officially bought and paid for.', ">>{TommyOKe} : A post that doesn't bash Trump?? Downvote!!!", ">>{Aceofspades25} : Nice one... I was concerned about this document when I saw it on r/the_donk but only because I'm not American and I don't understand your laws around classification or who the COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM is. Glad somebody has put this one to rest", ">>{nycola} : When you lie that much, its only natural response for everyone to believe you always lie. Perhaps she should try a different approach to regaining the trust of the public, or she can keep lying and expect people to actually like and trust her. That's the Clinton way though, just keep ignoring something and hope it goes away and people forget.", ">>{thegreatgazoo} : He claimed on radio ads that he had been a security expert for 5 years. At best he exaggerated his experience as a part time staffer for Hank Johnson. As a voter in the district it can't be that hard to tell the truth in his ads, especially with a $4 million mostly from out of state war chest.", ">>{nycola} : They can actually - it was literally part of her job description to identify whether or not a document is classified or contains classified information even if it is not marked. Meanwhile she claims she doesn't even know what a (c) means.", ">>{Brady_55} : I don't base my opinion on one word. But that's just me.", '>>{slippadatongue} : Remember that time republicans voted for someone who used to be a democrat and is a reality TV star with zero experience and many disqualifying facts about him just because he had an (R) next to his name back in Nov?', '>>{verbose_gent} : The party of, and protecting, Donald Trump has an issue with someone stretching the truth just a tiny itty bitty bit? Is that too unethical to hold office?', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : No, practically that's not part of her job, OCAs designate subordinates for that work.", '>>{nycola} : No, its actually a responsibility of having Top Secret Clearance. > What matters in the world of secrets is the information itself, which may or may not be marked “classified.” Employees at the highest levels of access are expected to apply the highest levels of judgment, based on the standards in Executive Order 13526. The government’s basic nondisclosure agreement makes clear the rule is “marked or unmarked classified information.” http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/08/03/what-everyone-with-a-top-secret-security-clearance-knows-or-should-know/', '>>{thegreatgazoo} : I\'m tired of giant douche vs turd sandwich. The republicans don\'t like trump. Never have. He got the most tepid endorsements from congress leaders of probably anybody in their party ever. I\'m not wild about trump or frankly any of them. They all act like spoiled brats with their hands in every cookie jar they can get in. There are 4 other democrats running in the race. Somehow a guy who doesn\'t even live in the district got tagged as the golden child. If he gets elected he\'s going to have a laundry list of big favors to repay. Meanwhile we\'ll be represented by someone in the minority party so his influence will be pretty much nil. Meanwhile Karen Handel will probably come in second as a "politician" who has lost about 5x as many races as she won. Though if she hadn\'t had a vagina she probably would have been governor back when she ran.', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > No, its actually a responsibility of having Top Secret Clearance. No, it's their prerogative if they CHOOSE to classify or declassify - it's not their job to do it. Sitting all day going over emails to check for classified information is clearly not what an SOS is supposed to do. Thanks for your 'blog' link, I am sure it's coming from an actual OCA. Oh, it's not. LOL", ">>{violentintenttoday} : That would be interesting if this were the same race. It's not. It's like saying that when the Bears were losing to the Packers by 7 points in the first quarter and the Bears won, therefore there is no point in watching another football game with the same score. They're different players, in a different game. No big bombs (other than Palin turning out to be an idiot) happened in either. They're dropping left and right this time", ">>{verbose_gent} : > Somehow a guy who doesn't even live in the district got tagged as the golden child. Better organizing. When it comes to the job, you should want someone who can pull resources like that together better. But, I mean, vote how you want to vote. No one on my ballots have ever been the *perfect* candidate.", '>>{wavescrashover} : Kennedy asked the FBI not to classify something. Not sure how this could be seen as a bad thing because that means it would have been released to the public. The FBI ultimately left it classified. As far as the quid pro quo allegations, it was an FBI agent that proposed the "favor." The FBI said today that they\'ve launched an internal investigation because of it. The agent in question is retired. Rachel Maddow covered it tonight on her show so I\'m sure tomorrow more news outlets will go over it all in better detail. A short video clip from her show explaining it: https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/788199226790391808', ">>{Nezgul} : Don't dismiss it yet. Old people are always the higher demographic in early voting. I would hope to see higher turnout than usual once normal voting begins, though.", '>>{neuronexmachina} : My understanding is Democrats tend to do early in-person voting, while Republicans tend to do mail-in voting. The state of Georgia [has both](http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/absentee-and-early-voting.aspx).', ">>{wavescrashover} : This is incorrect. Chaffetz just heard about it from other people and issued his statement without having read the documents himself. What ACTUALLY happened was that Kennedy asked the FBI to not classify a document. The FBI ultimately left it classified. An FBI agent was the one to ask the state dept about a favor, which never happened. The FBI said that today they've launched an internal investigation into the matter. Also, the FBI agent involved is now retired. Rachel Maddow covered it on her show tonight (last night?) so hopefully more of the news outlets will elaborate tomorrow. Here's a short video clip of her explaining what really happened (after speaking with the FBI): https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/788199226790391808", '>>{wavescrashover} : In case it wasn\'t made clear by the other comment reply to this - there were no "Confidential" headers on any of the emails. There were the (C) portion markings in an email that she didn\'t consider to mean "Classified" because that email (or those emails if there was more than 1, I forget) lacked the "Confidential" header & footer that it would require. The FBI presented her with fake/example documents that featured the "Confidential" header/footer to see if she knew what that meant. She did, so then she asked if the (C) portion marking in the email/s was related to that. It should also be mentioned that the information marked with the (C) portion markings was not information that should have been classified, which is why she didn\'t assume it to actually be classified even in the absence of the "Confidential" header/footer.', '>>{redroguetech} : > Who do you think asked Secretary Kennedy to seek reclassification? No clue. There\'s no mention of that. Why? Please explain why the person who told the official to requests officials to classify the letter as "B9" were incorrect to have done so. >That is the nut here, who initiated the action? I assure you, that is not the most obvious nut.', '>>{nycola} : No, you misunderstand, it is their job to recognize information, marked or not, that could be deemed classified.', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : No, it's an OPTION, it's not their job to sit and review emails for classified information.", ">>{nycola} : It's not an option, it's a job responsibility to be able to recognize information that is sensitive whether marked or not. I never said she was classifying emails herself, God forbid that actually, it was, however, her responsibility, while having top secret clearance, to recognize that type of information.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > it's a job responsibility Again, IF THEY CHOSE TO then they can upgrade or downgrade - it's not their JOB to go through every document reviewing for classified info.", ">>{nycola} : Jesus you're obtuse, part of having top secret clearance is the ability to recognize marked or unmarked sensitive material. I realize she isn't there sorting it into piles, she is still required to recognize it.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : You are not getting this. The OCA designation is purely symbolic just how the President is the OCA for the entire government and yet he isn't the one looking over documents to mark and unmark. She isn't 'REQUIRED' to do shit as an OCA, is a purely symbolic position and not even Powell who had military training passed that test where he was able to recognize all classified info", ">>{nycola} : No, you're not getting it. I'm not claiming it is Hillary's responsibility, or Powell's to single handedly classify documents, obviously, that isn't how it works. I'm not implying, either, that Hillary's job was ever to sit there and review documents in an effort to classify them. But she was, without any doubt, fully responsible, by having top secret clearance, to know and differentiate things that are considered sensitive information, even if they are not marked as such. Meanwhile, Hillary claims she doesn't even know what the fuck a (c) means. She's a moron, a liar, or both.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > But she was, without any doubt, fully responsible, Again, it was a purely symbolic position and you are being disingenuous if you think SoS hve the time or inclination to do what you are suggesting they do. There is a reason no previous SoS did the same >Hillary claims she doesn't even know what the fuck a (c) means. She's a moron, a liar, or both. The only liar here is you Frm the FBI files >Clinton identified a “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer (inserted in the document by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked if the “(C)” related to the “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer.", ">>{nycola} : She literally asked the FBI what (C) meant when it was (supposed to have been) part of her training. So, i reiterate, she's a moron, a liar, or both. You're trying very hard to cover for her, and what you just showed me is that the fucking ex-Secretary of State isn't even sure what (C) means. And you want her as a President? Jesus christ, god help us all. We need a reset on the last 2 years.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > She literally asked the FBI what (C) meant when it was (supposed to have been) part of her training She knew what (C) meant which is not what you were saying, end of story.', '>>{nycola} : If she knew, they why, by your own quote, did she ask the FBI agent to confirm?', '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Because it was not a classified document and (C) is only relevant when there is a header and footer otherwise (C) (aka portion marking in this context) is not supposed to mean anything >Every classified document shall show on the first page, title page, or front cover (hereafter referred to as “the face of the document”), the originating DoD Component and office and the date of the document’s origin. This information shall be clear enough to allow someone receiving the document to contact the preparing office if issues or questions about the classification arise." >PORTION MARKS. Every classified document shall show, as clearly as is possible, which information in it is classified and at what level." http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001_vol2.pdf', ">>{nycola} : These are for documents which have been deemed as classified. We know this. I am talking about documents and correspondences which have not been classified yet, however, the person involved in or viewing them needs to have (due to security clearance) the wherewithal to realize the contents are sensitive. Hillary either didn't care, or was too stupid to consider it an option.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > Hillary either didn't care, or was too stupid to consider it an option. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/hillary-clinton-lawyer-top-secret-clearance-121736", '>>{Uncle_Bill} : Nor are you curious... B9 classification from what I can tell, is reserved for cartagrphic documents, maps. No maps, but that would change something "Classified" to something else and making it disappear. Now, why do you think the FBI who reported this used the term Quid-pro-quo?', '>>{Uncle_Bill} : Why make something classified unclassified? Perhaps to preserve a lie like "Their were no classified material on my server!"... Of course the risk of trying to declassify something for political gain is obvious as it risk infosec, but what does that matter?', '>>{redroguetech} : > Nor are you curious... > B9 classification from what I can tell, is reserved for cartagrphic documents, maps. And....? First off, this entire thing comes from one person (Brian McCauley) who, if you dig more deeply into the story, turns out to be compromised. There are hints that this Brian McCauley was taking government payouts to classify these documents to begin with! And... As if that weren\'t bad enough, the person summarizing McCauley\'s report may have ALSO been taking bribes!! Now, to be fair, some characterize this blatant act of quid pro quo bribery as being "employed" to do a "job", but the facts are the facts. A government official taking money to perform favors for the government is bribery. Even aside from the disreputable source, why do you doubt that the email references maps or cartography, when it reads: > Post reports that Libyans police have arrested serveral people today who may/may have some connection to the Benghazi attack, They were action on information furnished by DS/RSO. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx That may or may not materialize, according to David McFarland. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Overal, this could lead to something operational, or not, and it could lead to news accounts from Libya saying there is a significant break in the case, or not. I\'m really interested in you admitting to having illegal unauthorized access to classified material to claim that "...xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx..." and "...xxxxxxxxxxxx..." aren\'t clearly related to maps. >No maps, but that would change something "Classified" to something else and making it disappear. You do realize that "classified"... ~~literally~~ means "secret"? Sorry, stupid question. (Well, to be fair, it literally means to arrange in a category, but in context specifically to categorize as to degree of secrecy.) >Now, why do you think the FBI who reported this used the term Quid-pro-quo? The FBI did not report it. An agent (who clearly can\'t be trusted) used the phrase in an internal document (to characterize the statements of yet another agent), which Rep. Chaffetz has capitalized on based on his presumption that many people would be... easily manipulated into believing it to be somehow a bad thing (and being too stupid to realize he proved *himself* as being a load of bullshit). And why he specifically characterized what has always been called "compromise" is now, in relation to his personal kangaroo court, suddenly "quid pro quo" is an interesting question. Why do you think that Rep. Chaffetz has jumped on an innocuous use of a neutral term buried in thousands of documents describing a common practice in... well, every human endeavor ever (not withstanding the Republican controlled Congress), in order to hype it in the media?', ">>{Bab2385} : > Clearly, the entire story is politically motivated, created in whole by Rep. Chaffetz. Do you realize that this is a statement on the website of the House Oversight Committee, of which Chaffetz chairs? I don't feel like you do."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{nycola} : Chaffetz, Nunes Statement on New FBI Files from Clinton Investigation - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform', ">>{Def2AllGaiznBlaks} : I guess it's time for Rapin' Bill to get on the ol' airplane and have another chitchat about golf and risotto with the attorney general", ">>{nycola} : Are these downvotes automatic? What's wrong QT's, you don't want the world to see an official statement put forth by the House Oversight Committee? Don't you love your government's checks and balances system? This is all thats left of democracy, sadly. MURCA", ">>{Lazysleeper} : It's bad for Hillary so you get down votes. Don't you get how this sub works now. only Pro- Hillary stuff. get with the program.", ">>{pinballwiz} : Yeah, the same Chaffetz who: * Conducted all the Benghazi hearing while admitting that he voted to cut the funding for embassy security and his own party members admitted the hearings were politically motivated * displayed a chart he claimed was taken from Planned Parenthood's annual report, but sources confirm the claim the chart was actually taken from Americans United for Life chart data that was deliberately manipulated using questionable dual-axis charting methodologies * Totally dismissed the Nobel Peace award because President Obama had been awarded it. Sounds like a great guy!", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Both FBI and State on Monday denied any "quid pro quo." "The FBI determined that one such email was classified at the Secret level," FBI said Monday in a statement. "A senior State Department official requested the FBI re-review that email to determine whether it was in fact classified or whether it might be protected from release under a different FOIA exemption. A now-retired FBI official, who was not part of the subsequent Clinton investigation, told the State Department official that they would look into the matter. Having been previously unsuccessful in attempts to speak with the senior State official, during the same conversation, the FBI official asked the State Department official if they would address a pending, unaddressed FBI request for space for additional FBI employees assigned abroad." http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/17/politics/hillary-clinton-server-patrick-kennedy-quid-pro-quo/index.html Expert grapher Chaffetz punk\'d again', '>>{redroguetech} : > you don\'t want the world to see an official statement put forth by the House Oversight Committee? Why the fuck would you think that? I mean, this is from Rep. Chaffetz of the House Oversight Committee. That in itself would be enough for people to say "Nothing to see; move along."', '>>{redroguetech} : ... I\'m confused. Are you saying those who are actually think it\'s somehow relevant as "bad" for Clinton are downvoting? Or are you saying that those who are smart and/or rational enough to know that it literally has nothing at all to do with Clinton are downvoting? I mean, are you suggesting any story irrelevant to Clinton gets downvoted?', '>>{redroguetech} : Are you being serious? You\'re suggesting that the chair of the House Oversight Committee fabricating a false story for personal political gain is representative of "car[ing] deeply for his country"?', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Let me get this straight - the only benefit the state department could have had is to make the email public and for this they will try to 'bribe' the FBI?", '>>{Glitch198} : I am so glad we are at a point in our country when the public is against oversight of our government.', ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : If Clinton said it, it's a lie. If a Clinton supporter said it, its wrong. Hmmm, being brainless is easy.", '>>{redroguetech} : Nobody oversees the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.', ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : Removal of classification means the information is no longer illegal to have anywhere but legally approved locations. So, if the information was in an email, someone put it there illegally, sent it illegally and anyone possessing that email was doing so illegally. So, no, the idiotic assertion that the only benefit was the ability to make it public basically requires everyone to ignore the entire point of the FBI investigation. To determine if classified information was mishandled. But apparently despite both state and the FBI being aware of this particular piece of information and discussing a horse trade to unclassify it, nobody is to blame for it being present in an email. None of which really matters, as quid pro quo doesn't require some objective level of benefit, just that the party recieving it finds it beneficial in some way. Still struggling with basic definitions I see.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > Removal of classification means the information is no longer illegal to have anywhere but legally approved locations. The email was retroactively classified aka wasn't marked - nobody gets in trouble for unmarked classified material. Just ask Thomas Drake or Comey himself.", '>>{BuyPepe} : > literally has nothing at all to do with Clinton What? This is very relevant to Clinton and current politics.', '>>{Bab2385} : Was it retroactively classified, or not properly marked? Because those are NOT the same thing.', ">>{Bab2385} : Again, was it retroactively classified or not properly marked? If it were information that the State Department generated, they get to make the call. If it was generated at another agency, how they feel about the classification status doesn't fucking matter.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : It was upclassified by the FBI and generated by the state department in an unclassified form', ">>{Bab2385} : I really don't think you understand what I'm saying. I realize the emails were generated in the State Department, I'm talking about the information in those emails. The FBI doesn't have the authority to upclassify anything, only the originating agencies can do that. I can see an argument if it was retroactively classified. But if it was not properly marked, that means it was classified at the time it was sent. And if they're arguing about it and trying to have the classification removed, that means the information was not generated at the Department of State.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > The FBI doesn't have the authority to upclassify anything, only the originating agencies can do that. This is incorrect, other agencies can raise objections and upclassify information on their own. There is no central classification agency so agencies can either get their classification disputes settled by going to another agency (last time they went to the CIA) or argue with each other and let it slide. Retroactive marking can be done by any OCA if they happen to have access to the information themselves.", '>>{redroguetech} : >This is very relevant to Clinton How? >and current politics. Not denying that. Clearly, the entire story is politically motivated, created in whole by Rep. Chaffetz.', '>>{VanTil} : > nobody gets in trouble for unmarked classified material And whoever believes that has never read a classification guide before. Sending out classified information without marking it appropriately is a felony.', '>>{Bab2385} : From [Comey](https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system): >FBI investigators have also read all of the approximately 30,000 e-mails provided by Secretary Clinton to the State Department in December 2014. Where an e-mail was assessed as possibly containing classified information, the FBI referred the e-mail to any U.S. government agency that was a likely “owner” of information in the e-mail, so that agency could make a determination as to whether the e-mail contained classified information at the time it was sent or received, or whether there was reason to classify the e-mail now, even if its content was not classified at the time it was sent (that is the process sometimes referred to as “up-classifying”). So no, the FBI did not upclassify anything.', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : >And whoever believes that has never read a classification guide before. So name ONE person in history of government who has been successfully prosecuted over unmarked or unknown classified material. Should be easy for you. >Sending out classified information without marking it appropriately is a felony. First, this information was SENT to her. Second, she is an OCA, she can determine classification for any material generated within her department. Using one's own authority is not a felony under any law.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : From the DoD >Every classified document shall show on the first page, title page, or front cover (hereafter referred to as “the face of the document”), the originating DoD Component and office and the date of the document’s origin. This information shall be clear enough to allow someone receiving the document to contact the preparing office if issues or questions about the classification arise." >PORTION MARKS. Every classified document shall show, as clearly as is possible, which information in it is classified and at what level." http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001_vol2.pdf Marking them on review is what I am referring to as upclassifying, you may call it retroactive markings as well. The email didn\'t meet the DoD standard which is why it was in dispute.', '>>{Bab2385} : >Second, she is an OCA, she can determine classification for any material generated within her department. Yes, this is true. But since the State Department was trying to argue about the classification status, this information was **NOT** generated by the State Department.', ">>{VanTil} : let's not forget that (C) and (S) were headers on some of her emails. But those are meaningless, right? ;) >So name ONE person in history of government who has been successfully prosecuted over unmarked or unknown classified material. Should be easy for you. [Not sure if you're a troll or just dense](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798)", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > was NOT generated by the State Department. Let's even assume it's true because I haven't read anything saying otherwise. The information was not marked as classified when it was SENT TO Clinton, she is in no way responsible if the agency who generated the information decided not to mark it.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : >Every classified document shall show on the first page, title page, or front cover (hereafter referred to as “the face of the document”), the originating DoD Component and office and the date of the document’s origin. This information shall be clear enough to allow someone receiving the document to contact the preparing office if issues or questions about the classification arise." >PORTION MARKS. Every classified document shall show, as clearly as is possible, which information in it is classified and at what level." http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001_vol2.pdf Portion markings are only relevant if the headers are marked. Also frm the FBI files >Clinton identified a “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer (inserted in the document by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked if the “(C)” related to the “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer.', ">>{Bab2385} : This argument again. Firstly, the DoS is not the DoD. Secondly, the [SF 312](http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/HRC-classified-NDA1.pdf), that everyone signs when they get their security clearance doesn't say that. Markings do NOT negate classification status. It only makes it difficult to prosecute when there are no markings. >As used in this Agreement, classified information is marked or unmarked classified information, including oral communications, that is classified under the standards of Executive Order 13526, or under any other Executive order or statute that prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of information in the interest of national security; and unclassified information that meets the standards for classification and is in the process of a classification determination as provided in sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4(e) of Executive Order 13526, or under any other Executive order or statute that requires protection for such information in the interest of national security", ">>{Bab2385} : This argument isn't even about Her. This is about her employees trying to get the classification removed from something she sent/or received.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Agencies regularly dispute classification, it won't be even news if she wasn't sent that information and ignorant people pretending she would have been held liable for it", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : You missed this from the NDA >(3) Basis for liability. > A party to the SF 312, SF 189, or SF 189-A may be liable for disclosing "classified information" only if he or she knows or reasonably should know that: (i) the marked or unmarked information is classified, or meets the standards for classification and is in the process of a classification determination; and (ii) his or her action will result, or reasonably could result in the unauthorized disclosure of that information. **In no instance may a party to the SF 312, SF 189 or SF 189-A be liable for violating its nondisclosure provisions by disclosing information when, at the time of the disclosure, there is no basis to suggest, other than pure speculation, that the information is classified or in the process of a classification determination.** http://www.archives.gov/isoo/training/standard-form-312.html And you missed this from the EO by OBama Section 1.1. Classification Standards. (a) Information may be originally classified under the terms of this order only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) an original classification authority is classifying the information; https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information Since the material was not endorsed by an OCA, nobody could be held responsible for not treating it as such', ">>{Bab2385} : We're not talking about liability here. We're talking about having the classification removed. I'm not arguing that her liability is greatly diminished without markings. I'm saying that the State Department cannot decide the classification status of information generated by other agencies. Even if they don't agree with it, if they aren't the owning agency, they are responsible for handling it at the classification status that the owning agency determines.", ">>{Bab2385} : Please refer to my other comments regarding the liability- as I am not disputing that. I'm talking about if the information was classified at the time it was sent, the lack of markings does NOT negate the classification status.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > the lack of markings does NOT negate the classification status. The status was not known at the time hence no issue of liability', ">>{Bab2385} : Again. You keep referring to liability, and that isn't what I'm talking about. Was the information retroactively classified, or not properly marked? I said, I could see his argument if it was classified after the fact. If it was classified at the time it was sent, he doesn't get to make the call about the classification status. I keep repeating this and I feel like you're being willfully obtuse to the point I am making.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > I'm saying that the State Department cannot decide the classification status of information generated by other agencies. They can dispute it which is what they were doing here. http://www.salon.com/2016/02/29/state_dept_wins_dispute_over_clinton_email_on_north_korea/", ">>{Bab2385} : That isn't unclassifying it. That's lowering the classification, which is **not** what Kennedy requested.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Again, it wasn't marked from what I read. It was not classified at the time it was sent.", ">>{Bab2385} : I'm done with this conversation. You seem to not understand that markings have no bearing on classification status, only liability.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : They can request either of those things which is what I am pointing out.', '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : And we are talking about liability here, classification status can change based on many things but the conversation is relevant only regards to Clinton and her emails.', '>>{turdovski} : Yep. A post about politics made by politicians.... Downvoted.', '>>{Uncle_Bill} : Who do you think asked Secretary Kennedy to seek reclassification? That is the nut here, who initiated the action?', '>>{Uncle_Bill} : I received no classified information on my server. -HRC Easiest way to make that so is to declassify everything....', '>>{9kokonotsu} : I am fed up with the ridiculous amount of censorship and voter manipulation here so I made my own subreddit clone: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Redacted/', '>>{NeverThrowawayUSA} : 3 hours after being posted, 39 points, 63% upvoted. This sub is officially bought and paid for.', ">>{TommyOKe} : A post that doesn't bash Trump?? Downvote!!!", ">>{Aceofspades25} : Nice one... I was concerned about this document when I saw it on r/the_donk but only because I'm not American and I don't understand your laws around classification or who the COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM is. Glad somebody has put this one to rest", ">>{nycola} : When you lie that much, its only natural response for everyone to believe you always lie. Perhaps she should try a different approach to regaining the trust of the public, or she can keep lying and expect people to actually like and trust her. That's the Clinton way though, just keep ignoring something and hope it goes away and people forget.", ">>{nycola} : They can actually - it was literally part of her job description to identify whether or not a document is classified or contains classified information even if it is not marked. Meanwhile she claims she doesn't even know what a (c) means.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : No, practically that's not part of her job, OCAs designate subordinates for that work.", '>>{nycola} : No, its actually a responsibility of having Top Secret Clearance. > What matters in the world of secrets is the information itself, which may or may not be marked “classified.” Employees at the highest levels of access are expected to apply the highest levels of judgment, based on the standards in Executive Order 13526. The government’s basic nondisclosure agreement makes clear the rule is “marked or unmarked classified information.” http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/08/03/what-everyone-with-a-top-secret-security-clearance-knows-or-should-know/', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > No, its actually a responsibility of having Top Secret Clearance. No, it's their prerogative if they CHOOSE to classify or declassify - it's not their job to do it. Sitting all day going over emails to check for classified information is clearly not what an SOS is supposed to do. Thanks for your 'blog' link, I am sure it's coming from an actual OCA. Oh, it's not. LOL", '>>{wavescrashover} : Kennedy asked the FBI not to classify something. Not sure how this could be seen as a bad thing because that means it would have been released to the public. The FBI ultimately left it classified. As far as the quid pro quo allegations, it was an FBI agent that proposed the "favor." The FBI said today that they\'ve launched an internal investigation because of it. The agent in question is retired. Rachel Maddow covered it tonight on her show so I\'m sure tomorrow more news outlets will go over it all in better detail. A short video clip from her show explaining it: https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/788199226790391808', ">>{wavescrashover} : This is incorrect. Chaffetz just heard about it from other people and issued his statement without having read the documents himself. What ACTUALLY happened was that Kennedy asked the FBI to not classify a document. The FBI ultimately left it classified. An FBI agent was the one to ask the state dept about a favor, which never happened. The FBI said that today they've launched an internal investigation into the matter. Also, the FBI agent involved is now retired. Rachel Maddow covered it on her show tonight (last night?) so hopefully more of the news outlets will elaborate tomorrow. Here's a short video clip of her explaining what really happened (after speaking with the FBI): https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/788199226790391808", '>>{wavescrashover} : In case it wasn\'t made clear by the other comment reply to this - there were no "Confidential" headers on any of the emails. There were the (C) portion markings in an email that she didn\'t consider to mean "Classified" because that email (or those emails if there was more than 1, I forget) lacked the "Confidential" header & footer that it would require. The FBI presented her with fake/example documents that featured the "Confidential" header/footer to see if she knew what that meant. She did, so then she asked if the (C) portion marking in the email/s was related to that. It should also be mentioned that the information marked with the (C) portion markings was not information that should have been classified, which is why she didn\'t assume it to actually be classified even in the absence of the "Confidential" header/footer.', '>>{redroguetech} : > Who do you think asked Secretary Kennedy to seek reclassification? No clue. There\'s no mention of that. Why? Please explain why the person who told the official to requests officials to classify the letter as "B9" were incorrect to have done so. >That is the nut here, who initiated the action? I assure you, that is not the most obvious nut.', '>>{nycola} : No, you misunderstand, it is their job to recognize information, marked or not, that could be deemed classified.', ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : No, it's an OPTION, it's not their job to sit and review emails for classified information.", ">>{nycola} : It's not an option, it's a job responsibility to be able to recognize information that is sensitive whether marked or not. I never said she was classifying emails herself, God forbid that actually, it was, however, her responsibility, while having top secret clearance, to recognize that type of information.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > it's a job responsibility Again, IF THEY CHOSE TO then they can upgrade or downgrade - it's not their JOB to go through every document reviewing for classified info.", ">>{nycola} : Jesus you're obtuse, part of having top secret clearance is the ability to recognize marked or unmarked sensitive material. I realize she isn't there sorting it into piles, she is still required to recognize it.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : You are not getting this. The OCA designation is purely symbolic just how the President is the OCA for the entire government and yet he isn't the one looking over documents to mark and unmark. She isn't 'REQUIRED' to do shit as an OCA, is a purely symbolic position and not even Powell who had military training passed that test where he was able to recognize all classified info", ">>{nycola} : No, you're not getting it. I'm not claiming it is Hillary's responsibility, or Powell's to single handedly classify documents, obviously, that isn't how it works. I'm not implying, either, that Hillary's job was ever to sit there and review documents in an effort to classify them. But she was, without any doubt, fully responsible, by having top secret clearance, to know and differentiate things that are considered sensitive information, even if they are not marked as such. Meanwhile, Hillary claims she doesn't even know what the fuck a (c) means. She's a moron, a liar, or both.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > But she was, without any doubt, fully responsible, Again, it was a purely symbolic position and you are being disingenuous if you think SoS hve the time or inclination to do what you are suggesting they do. There is a reason no previous SoS did the same >Hillary claims she doesn't even know what the fuck a (c) means. She's a moron, a liar, or both. The only liar here is you Frm the FBI files >Clinton identified a “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer (inserted in the document by the FBI prior to the interview) and asked if the “(C)” related to the “CONFIDENTIAL” header and footer.", ">>{nycola} : She literally asked the FBI what (C) meant when it was (supposed to have been) part of her training. So, i reiterate, she's a moron, a liar, or both. You're trying very hard to cover for her, and what you just showed me is that the fucking ex-Secretary of State isn't even sure what (C) means. And you want her as a President? Jesus christ, god help us all. We need a reset on the last 2 years.", '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > She literally asked the FBI what (C) meant when it was (supposed to have been) part of her training She knew what (C) meant which is not what you were saying, end of story.', '>>{nycola} : If she knew, they why, by your own quote, did she ask the FBI agent to confirm?', '>>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : Because it was not a classified document and (C) is only relevant when there is a header and footer otherwise (C) (aka portion marking in this context) is not supposed to mean anything >Every classified document shall show on the first page, title page, or front cover (hereafter referred to as “the face of the document”), the originating DoD Component and office and the date of the document’s origin. This information shall be clear enough to allow someone receiving the document to contact the preparing office if issues or questions about the classification arise." >PORTION MARKS. Every classified document shall show, as clearly as is possible, which information in it is classified and at what level." http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/520001_vol2.pdf', ">>{nycola} : These are for documents which have been deemed as classified. We know this. I am talking about documents and correspondences which have not been classified yet, however, the person involved in or viewing them needs to have (due to security clearance) the wherewithal to realize the contents are sensitive. Hillary either didn't care, or was too stupid to consider it an option.", ">>{FuckIdiotsWithFacts} : > Hillary either didn't care, or was too stupid to consider it an option. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/hillary-clinton-lawyer-top-secret-clearance-121736", '>>{Uncle_Bill} : Nor are you curious... B9 classification from what I can tell, is reserved for cartagrphic documents, maps. No maps, but that would change something "Classified" to something else and making it disappear. Now, why do you think the FBI who reported this used the term Quid-pro-quo?', '>>{Uncle_Bill} : Why make something classified unclassified? Perhaps to preserve a lie like "Their were no classified material on my server!"... Of course the risk of trying to declassify something for political gain is obvious as it risk infosec, but what does that matter?', '>>{redroguetech} : > Nor are you curious... > B9 classification from what I can tell, is reserved for cartagrphic documents, maps. And....? First off, this entire thing comes from one person (Brian McCauley) who, if you dig more deeply into the story, turns out to be compromised. There are hints that this Brian McCauley was taking government payouts to classify these documents to begin with! And... As if that weren\'t bad enough, the person summarizing McCauley\'s report may have ALSO been taking bribes!! Now, to be fair, some characterize this blatant act of quid pro quo bribery as being "employed" to do a "job", but the facts are the facts. A government official taking money to perform favors for the government is bribery. Even aside from the disreputable source, why do you doubt that the email references maps or cartography, when it reads: > Post reports that Libyans police have arrested serveral people today who may/may have some connection to the Benghazi attack, They were action on information furnished by DS/RSO. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx That may or may not materialize, according to David McFarland. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Overal, this could lead to something operational, or not, and it could lead to news accounts from Libya saying there is a significant break in the case, or not. I\'m really interested in you admitting to having illegal unauthorized access to classified material to claim that "...xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx..." and "...xxxxxxxxxxxx..." aren\'t clearly related to maps. >No maps, but that would change something "Classified" to something else and making it disappear. You do realize that "classified"... ~~literally~~ means "secret"? Sorry, stupid question. (Well, to be fair, it literally means to arrange in a category, but in context specifically to categorize as to degree of secrecy.) >Now, why do you think the FBI who reported this used the term Quid-pro-quo? The FBI did not report it. An agent (who clearly can\'t be trusted) used the phrase in an internal document (to characterize the statements of yet another agent), which Rep. Chaffetz has capitalized on based on his presumption that many people would be... easily manipulated into believing it to be somehow a bad thing (and being too stupid to realize he proved *himself* as being a load of bullshit). And why he specifically characterized what has always been called "compromise" is now, in relation to his personal kangaroo court, suddenly "quid pro quo" is an interesting question. Why do you think that Rep. Chaffetz has jumped on an innocuous use of a neutral term buried in thousands of documents describing a common practice in... well, every human endeavor ever (not withstanding the Republican controlled Congress), in order to hype it in the media?', ">>{Bab2385} : > Clearly, the entire story is politically motivated, created in whole by Rep. Chaffetz. Do you realize that this is a statement on the website of the House Oversight Committee, of which Chaffetz chairs? I don't feel like you do."], ['>>{whose_that} : Hillary Clinton up 6 points over donald trump in the latest FOX News poll', ">>{coffee_dude08} : For her to be up 6 in a Fox poll probably means she's really up by 10.", '>>{whose_that} : It means Donald is fucked. I hope he takes the GOP down with him.', '>>{conservativeliberals} : This is good for Donnie, he is plating 3d twister!', '>>{fredjonez} : AMONG REPUBLICANS Who would you rather have as the Republican Party’s presidential nominee? Donald Trump 48% Someone else 51%', '>>{NateGrey} : Trump Supporter - "This is a good thing".', '>>{wesswll} : Fox News is just who paid for the poll. It was actually conducted jointly by Anderson Robbins Research and Shaw & Company Research (it says this on the first page of the poll people). FiveThirtyEight [gives these pollsters a rating of A](http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/) , and actually lists them as having a mean-reverted bias of +0.4 towards the Democratic side.', '>>{fredjonez} : Still 6 points is pretty big. It solidifies the average of the last few polls of being about 6-7% and if you look at the battle ground polls, they reflect this lead.', ">>{sanspri} : and he's only down single digits. a shudder courses through the Clinton camp", '>>{fredjonez} : Not really, 6 points is a big lead when you have several other polls that not only back up the lead, but show battle ground states moving rapidly toward Clinton. They are probably happy but vigilant.', ">>{sanspri} : > Not really, 6 points is a big lead single digits are single digits. he's out polling her on honesty, terrorism. going to come down to swing states, a barn burner unless Hillary is indicted. electoral college should be apportioned, not winner take all", '>>{cookiemawo} : And there have been no debates yet and he has spent $0 on advertising so far.', ">>{notjabba} : And if she's up 10 it's really more like 15 because she knows how to focus the fight in swing states and has a ground game to get people to the polls. Trump is too busy staring at himself in the mirror to actually run a campaign.", ">>{fredjonez} : It was basically a tie with Obama and Romney during the summer. When people really start paying attention and realize that not only is Trump an actual candidate, but out of his mind, it won't really be a close election. We are already seeing huge movements in swing states toward Clinton, and close results in solid red states. Six points nationally would translate to a large margin in the general. We have a long way to go, but I just don't see how it swings the other direction with Trump hated so much. Also terrorism seems to favor Clinton, Trump keeps screwing up every chance he has to respond and the polls are reflecting that. As far as honesty, he is barely out polling her, anbd I don't suspect that lasts long.", ">>{OmiSan13} : He has spent $0 because he doesnt have the money. Doesn't matter if you can win the Kentucky derby if you don't have a horse. Don't get your hopes up on the debates. A general election debate isnt a dick measuring contest like the republican debates.", ">>{Brady_55} : I have to admit, that I was never a big fan of the electoral college. Today, I am glad at the foresight our founding fathers had when they made the electoral college. A 6 point lead is an electoral landslide. We can't let the orange man make it to the White House.", ">>{wesswll} : > single digits are single digits. This is very disingenuous. The last President to win the election with a double digit margin was Reagan with his landslide over Mondale in '84. Clinton winning the election with a 6 point margin would represent only the second time in the last 5 elections that the winning margin even topped 4 points.", '>>{whose_that} : I doubt they even know how to play chess. Too complicated. "What do you mean the horsie moves in an L?!"', ">>{whose_that} : >He hasn't even started on her yet! For the 112th time.", '>>{coffee_dude08} : I suspect that Hillary will dominate the superficial, no-substance Donnie in the debates.', ">>{dyzo_blue} : Trump supporters don't even know what an L is.", ">>{dyzo_blue} : And if she's up by 15, she's really up by 20.", '>>{whose_that} : They should, considering they have it stamped on their foreheads.', ">>{whose_that} : >I'm donating my Wow subscription money to a pretend billionaire! Who will match me?", '>>{sanspri} : > This is very disingenuous. The last President to win the election with a double digit margin These are polls. not the election', '>>{violentintenttoday} : Or that means pre nomination polling is pretty much useless.', ">>{violentintenttoday} : I like how you don't like it when you think it cheats you, but when it favors Hillary it's A-OK. That's why there's never any real reform in this country despite the tools for doing so are written into the constitution.", '>>{Brady_55} : I never thought it cheated anybody. I just never liked it personally. Now I do, because Cheeto Jesus is that dangerous.', ">>{wesswll} : Alright, well only looking at polls, /u/GaryGnu1979 has already shown that a 6 point margin is higher than Obama's over Romney at this point in the election. I will add that on 6/29/12, Obama led the RCP average by 3.8 points (he won the election by 3.9 points). If we look even farther back, we can see that at this point in 2008 the polls were >Gallup 6/30 - 7/2 Obama +4 >Rasmussen 6/29 - 7/1 Obama +5 >CNN 6/26 - 6/29 Obama +5 >Pew Research 6/18 - 6/29 Obama +8 On 6/29/08, Obama led the RCP average by 7.1 points (won the election by 7.2 points) To be fair, this was before the housing crash really peaked (the major banks failing in late July/early August and collapsed in September IIRC) , and that undoubtedly played a role in the election, so let's look back at this point in 2004 >Gallup 6/9 - 6/30 Bush +1 >NBC/WSJ 6/25 - 6/28 Bush +1 >CBS News/NY Times 6/23 - 6/27 Bush +1 >ARG 7/1 - 7/3 Kerry +3 On 6/29/04, Bush led the RCP average by 2.0 points (won the election by 2.4 points). So over the past 3 elections (I couldn't find the polls from 2000), we can see that not only have the margin between RCP averages at this point been remarkably close to the final margins (off by only 0.1, 0.1, and 0.4 respectively, but also that even looking at polling on at this point in those elections, a 6 point Hillary lead is still the second most comfortable of any election since at least Bush v. Gore.", '>>{sanspri} : look at all the polls you want. this is trump vs. Clinton, son. there is no modern precedent', ">>{C6O1999} : They should considering they're going to be taking one in November.", ">>{C6O1999} : He has spent $0 on advertising because he doesn't have any money son.", ">>{C6O1999} : He has spent $0 on advertising because he doesn't have any money son.", ">>{C6O1999} : When the numbers keep going in the same direction or keep coming in at the same spread, it's no longer +/- 3 anymore. It's just 6. She's winning by 6 with a lot of election left to go.", ">>{dyzo_blue} : Hillary supporters can't be bigots. In order to be a bigot, you need to possess two traits. The first is privilege: A structural, institutional, and social advantage. Trump supporters occupy positions of bigot privilege, even when they are disadvantaged in other ways. Second, you also have to have power: the ability, backed up by Trump supporters, to be a strong social influencer, with greater leeway when it comes to what you do, where, and how.", ">>{dudeguyy23} : A six point lead in GE polls in June is huge. It's still fluid, but I guarantee you Clinton is happier than Trump right now.", '>>{Anal_Vacuum} : Wait wait you\'re just messing around, right? You\'re not serious? A bigot is anyone who dislikes another person due to their beliefs. There is no "privilege" requirement to be a piece of shit. There are just as many pretentious Hillary supporters as Donald supporters.', '>>{dyzo_blue} : [m8 pls, im just fucking with you](http://www.dailydot.com/via/reverse-racism-doesnt-exist/)', '>>{violentintenttoday} : You realize no one is going to take you as anything but a nutter by saying "cheto jesus" right? I mean I just assume anyone who says any of those things, $hillary, Bernout, tRump, or any of that is a complete asshole', ">>{Brady_55} : Hold the hyperbole buddy. I'm poking fun at him using a funny name. Donald trump is a danger to this country. Better? Don't want to offend you, you know? I'm aware how thin-skinned trump supporters are.", '>>{violentintenttoday} : That\'s not what hyperbole is and the "funny names" generally aren\'t as funny as you think they are. Generally they work inside their assigned circlejerk, but when you come out of that circlejerk and start flinging them around hoping for the same effect, the real effect is to make it look like you\'ve lost touch with what color the sky is in the world the rest of us live in.', ">>{Brady_55} : You realize no one is going to take you as anything but a nutter.. Is most definitely hyperbole, considering I have plenty of civil discourse with many people on a daily basis on here. Learn the definition. And It humors me. Cheeto Jesus is funny as hell. But I'm aware that calling trump names offends you. I'm sorry, I don't want to offend you mr Anti-PC. I'll cut back on the funny names.", '>>{violentintenttoday} : It\'s really not hyperbole. When someone comes in and starts talking about $hillary, do you think "Hey, I\'ll bet this person has some well reasoned and informed opinion" or do you say, here\'s comes some Trump nut?', ">>{Brady_55} : I don't base my opinion on one word. But that's just me.", ">>{violentintenttoday} : That would be interesting if this were the same race. It's not. It's like saying that when the Bears were losing to the Packers by 7 points in the first quarter and the Bears won, therefore there is no point in watching another football game with the same score. They're different players, in a different game. No big bombs (other than Palin turning out to be an idiot) happened in either. They're dropping left and right this time"], ['>>{MediaTimes} : The First Week Of Early Voting Bodes Well For Democrat Jon Ossoff', '>>{Izor28} : Deja vu. I remember these stories coming out in the 2016 election. Its almost like they cant comprehend that democrats tend to early vote more than Republicans. But their base seems to love these fake news stories so whatever gets them clicks', ">>{verbose_gent} : This guy is going to win plain and simple. I live in Chicago and am familiar with who he is. I have never heard anything about whoever he is running against. I'm sure I can't even imagine how familiar people in the actual district are with him.", ">>{NotTheRealKenM} : Well, isn't the other side splitting their vote between a bunch of candidates? Then in the runoff presumably they will consolidate on the winner? Also, early voting tends to favor Democrats, right? It would be great if he could take the seat, but I don't think it's anywhere near a sure thing.", ">>{bluexy} : Ossoff doesn't have an FBI investigation that can cost him 10 percentage points in the week before the election, at least.", '>>{RidleyScotch} : >This guy is going to win plain and simple. Have we not learned this phrase has no meaning in American politics anymore', ">>{dubslies} : Fwiw, special elections can have funky results because they are usually much lower turnout, leaving the candidate with the most energy/resources behind them favored. Given that unpopular incumbent presidents tend to suck the energy out of their party in midterm elections, and that Trump has lit a fire under Democrats, it's not impossible that Ossoff wins. He has a ton of support, both in terms of volunteers, media attention and money. On the other hand, we're talking about a district that Republicans have been regularly winning by blowout margins (60% or more), and while Hillary almost won the district, it still might be better to think Ossoff will come close but ultimately not win just due to how conservative the district usually is. I have my hopes but probably best not to get them too high.", '>>{HiImAConservative} : Early voting always tends to favor the democratic candidate. That being said, it looks like Ossoff has a real chance here, if he can avoid a runoff.', '>>{verbose_gent} : Not like Clinton which I never said, like in 2008 with Obama.', '>>{Yoru_no_Majo} : You\'re not familiar with GA-06 if you think he\'s going to win "plain and simple." The district is extremely red, Tom Price (corrupt as he is) won re-election by 30% of the vote. I\'m not saying Ossof won\'t win, but I consider the most likely scenario being that he wins the first round of voting, but by under 50%, then narrowly loses in the second round because his opponent has an "R" by his name. Of course, it\'s possible he wins, but that\'ll require a surge in turnout among blue voters in possibly two rounds of voting. While there are some promising signs, it will require blue voters to turn out at extremely high rates. If a relatively small percentage of potential blue voters stay home - either because they think he doesn\'t have a chance, or because they assume he\'s won, he\'ll lose.', ">>{verbose_gent} : You seem to recognize these arent normal times, so I'm sure you're just being overly cautious. Thing is, I'm not a news anchor or anything. I'm just some asshole on the internet so I don't have any social or political responsibility here. With the way things are in this specific climate, I'd put my life savings on it.", ">>{HiImAConservative} : It's definitely not a sure thing. However, that being said, he has a real shot here. As you said yourself, Republicans are splitting their vote between a bunch of candidates. And there certainly is discontent with Trump in this district. In addition to this, Ossoff has raised nearly 3 million where your standard dem candidate for this district usually raises around 10,000. The way I see it is he has a really good chance of winning if he can avoid a run-off. I don't see him winning in a head to head vs a republican.", '>>{liliIllill} : > Early voting always tends to favor the democratic candidate. not in this district', ">>{HiImAConservative} : Do you have any evidence of that assertion?, I don't say that in a confrontational way, but if you want to make a claim that this district in particular bucks a well known national trend you'll need to provide some evidence.", '>>{Writerhaha} : Check out his appearance on the most recent episode of Pod Save America. Comes off as well spoken and fairly moderate.', '>>{brunnock} : Oh, good. Most of the folks that have voted are [in their 60s](https://twitter.com/ElectProject/status/848008061709168640/photo/1). I was afraid that younger kids might start voting and actually make a difference.', '>>{Aldebaran135} : Mr. Ossoff, you just won a plurality in the primary. "I know."', '>>{TheGoldenLight} : https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/848200288863432704 Day 5 of in-person early voting in GA-6 is D 51 R 29 Over all, D 54 R 30 with 8110 ballots accepted Still early, but trends are steady http://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8VpZhaXcAAElTW.jpg http://pbs.twimg.com/media/C8VpZhcXcAA13lx.jpg Check the graphs which include data from prior years.', ">>{TheGoldenLight} : Current early voting results have Ossof with >50% of the vote. If he can keep that going and end with more than half the votes there won't be a runoff vote, he'll just win outright. Also past results from this district indicate that he is outperforming expected early voting results", '>>{slaysia} : I believe the D 54 R 30 are percentages? So 54% dem | 30% repub', '>>{GoTBRays162} : Honest question. Why would early voting favor Democrats. Most people that vote early are old people who tend to vote Republican', ">>{moose_testes} : It doesn't matter so much if the Republican vote is split, so long as all Republicans combine for >50%. The special election is a jungle primary, so if no candidate hits 50% then the top two candidates go to a run-off.", '>>{_sillymarketing} : Not as true in the South. Lots of Black Churches organize their constituents in bus pickups and drop offs. Besides Mississippi, I think Georgia is top 3 for Black population and regular church attendance. Democrats are scared, I could easily see them gathering energy for early votes.', '>>{Adama0001} : Ha! I knew bussing was true. How dare they legally vote as a group in their given district! /s', '>>{whatnowdog} : The church voting normally happens if the voting is open on Sunday. The Red States cut Sunday voting out. Our state of NC even cut out the first Saturday and I think the Saturday before the election was open only until maybe 1pm.', ">>{thegreatgazoo} : It would be be nice if he actually lived in the district. He lives in the 5th district, not the sixth. He is also coming under fire for exaggerating his 'national security expert' claims in that he only had a security clearance for 5 months instead of 5 years.", '>>{whatnowdog} : This is also not normal because there is no incumbent. I hope the numbers stay high for him and he wins in the first round. Maybe Democrats learned their lesson and realize not voting means something.', ">>{verbose_gent} : That national security hit job was completely made up when I saw it yesterday. It was a false claim by the publication that attributed something to him that he never actually said. Complete bullshit. This is just opposition. It's a smear campaign. Even if it was true, the false claim isn't even any sort of big deal. It's not even a little deal. It's just fake outrage to sway voters against him.", ">>{coffeespeaking} : Not true. Republicans are traditionalists who think voting should happen on voting day. They are are resentful of change, and probably don't think their vote will be counted if it isn't done on election day. There can be more obstacles in getting Democrat voters to the polls, such as childcare, rides, time off from work. Democrats are much more likely to avail themselves of the longer poll access. This is why the GOP loves to shorten polling times, it disenfranchises voters of limited means.", ">>{thegreatgazoo} : He claimed on radio ads that he had been a security expert for 5 years. At best he exaggerated his experience as a part time staffer for Hank Johnson. As a voter in the district it can't be that hard to tell the truth in his ads, especially with a $4 million mostly from out of state war chest.", '>>{slippadatongue} : Remember that time republicans voted for someone who used to be a democrat and is a reality TV star with zero experience and many disqualifying facts about him just because he had an (R) next to his name back in Nov?', '>>{verbose_gent} : The party of, and protecting, Donald Trump has an issue with someone stretching the truth just a tiny itty bitty bit? Is that too unethical to hold office?', '>>{thegreatgazoo} : I\'m tired of giant douche vs turd sandwich. The republicans don\'t like trump. Never have. He got the most tepid endorsements from congress leaders of probably anybody in their party ever. I\'m not wild about trump or frankly any of them. They all act like spoiled brats with their hands in every cookie jar they can get in. There are 4 other democrats running in the race. Somehow a guy who doesn\'t even live in the district got tagged as the golden child. If he gets elected he\'s going to have a laundry list of big favors to repay. Meanwhile we\'ll be represented by someone in the minority party so his influence will be pretty much nil. Meanwhile Karen Handel will probably come in second as a "politician" who has lost about 5x as many races as she won. Though if she hadn\'t had a vagina she probably would have been governor back when she ran.', ">>{verbose_gent} : > Somehow a guy who doesn't even live in the district got tagged as the golden child. Better organizing. When it comes to the job, you should want someone who can pull resources like that together better. But, I mean, vote how you want to vote. No one on my ballots have ever been the *perfect* candidate.", ">>{Nezgul} : Don't dismiss it yet. Old people are always the higher demographic in early voting. I would hope to see higher turnout than usual once normal voting begins, though.", '>>{neuronexmachina} : My understanding is Democrats tend to do early in-person voting, while Republicans tend to do mail-in voting. The state of Georgia [has both](http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/absentee-and-early-voting.aspx).'], [">>{qounqer} : NBP's Quanell X: Trump Right About Dems Exploiting Black Votes", '>>{hearthneewb} : So can we add Breitbart to the long list of sites not eligible on the sub?', '>>{jokerZwild} : Because the GOP has done so much for them as well, right?', ">>{cajunrajing} : Breitbart Effect = Credibility - 99.5% How is this able to be posted again? Isn't it reposting the same link?", ">>{TotallyLiberal} : Nope but I'm sure there will be at least 4-5 people whining in the comments for it to be removed every time it's posted", ">>{hearthneewb} : Well when a site is owned by one of the worst human beings to walk the earth and its filled with conspiracy theories or things warped to the point they're no longer credible its kinda worth campaigning against its removal.", ">>{seanosul} : > Nope but I'm sure there will be at least 4-5 people whining in the comments for it to be removed every time it's posted I'm one of those. They should ban it or unban the liberal sites for balance. Why is there is a Red State but no Daily Kos? Why is Breittard allowed but the New Civil Rights movement is not?", '>>{ShakeyBobWillis} : Oh look...Breitbart. \\*downvote\\*', '>>{hobbes305} : According to the official propaganda arm of the Trump campaign. aka: breitbart.com', ">>{TotallyLiberal} : Bannon is one of the worst human beings to walk the earth? That's pretty intense.", '>>{jokerZwild} : Funny how the only thing people can find is Abe Lincoln but nothing current. Guess I should have clarified.', '>>{qounqer} : Lol there are like 4 articles on the front page from Vox.', '>>{qounqer} : CommieVox- Basic Economics centered around scarcity are racist.'], ['>>{TheChinchilla914} : The attack on Jeff Sessions is part of the new McCarthyism', '>>{jeffinRTP} : Fake news, we all know that wapo is part of the MSM liberal agenda.', ">>{rdevaughn} : He lied to Congress. This is absurd. The argument that he didn't lie rests on construing the phrase 'in the course of' to mean something other than 'during,' which is incredibly disingenuous.", '>>{heelspider} : How does referencing McCarthyism make it okay for Sessions to lie under oath?', ">>{paraconformity} : Donald Trump would know, he is literally the protégé of Joseph McCarthy's protégé, Roy Cohn.", '>>{Shiba-Shiba} : Crap! McCarthyism is Government driven, like the attacks on scientists from the Climate Change Denialists in power under Trump & co..', '>>{syncopator} : Really? An attorney offering up what proves to be false information outside the scope of the question he was asked *while interviewing for the job of Attorney General* is somehow "McCarthyism"? GTFO.', '>>{morvus_thenu} : you might call him an expert at both the baseless smear attack and general fear-mongering. Notice me, senpai! Mr. Cohn would be proud of his work.', '>>{paraconformity} : Wapo lets shitty conservative sycophants write dumb editorials telling their side of the story. This is one of those.', '>>{winstonjpenobscot} : Thankfully this tool is too stupid to realize that Trump\'s unfounded "wiretapping" allegation was sucking the oxygen out of the Sessions perjury thing. It was ^this ^close to being out of the national discussion. Good job scoring on your own goal!', ">>{Sports-Nerd} : You can't take off the metaphorical (well in this case quite literal) campaign hat and put on your senator hat and just pretend you are two different people.", '>>{TheChinchilla914} : So doesnt that essentially disqualify any sitting senator who publicly supported a candidate from doing senate-related work? This really is one hell of a witch-hunt from the party of sore losers', ">>{fdfgdfgggggf} : If they lied about it under oath? Yes. That's the issue here. If they lied about it under oath AND are incharge of essentially investigating themselves? Yes.", '>>{Mawontalk} : The author of the piece conveniently leaves out the question that Sessions was responding to when he lied, which contains the critical "in the course of" phrase. Sessions had the opportunity to correct his mistake in the time between the hearings and the confirmation vote, and he never said a thing.', ">>{Grizzly_Corey} : Nice try, those sore losers are trying to ensure that people don't lie under oath. I know, novel idea.", ">>{Sports-Nerd} : His excuse was that he didn't meet with the Russian ambassador in context of the campaign, which is what he says he thought the question was asking. What I'm saying that there is no way to separate the two jobs, unless Jeff Sessions has an identical twin, he is still just one person. It has nothing to do with the ability of him to do senate related work, he can still do it, but he can't mislead or lie about it. Even if he is not working on campaign stuff with the Russian ambassador, he is still apart of the trump campaign. If I'm a doctor, just because I'm off work doesn't mean I'm not a doctor.", '>>{Piscator629} : This is a surprise opinion hit piece from the Wapo.', '>>{ivsciguy} : Interestingly, there are experts on certain subjects that work for an airline 90% of the time, but the FAA 10% of the time. Most of them do wear literal FAA hats because they are under different legal rights and responsibilities when they are working on an FAA project.', ">>{preserved_fish} : Does anyone else remember when Ann Coulter, Trump's biggest fan, published that book in defense of McCarthy?", '>>{Negative_Clank} : Literally 8 years of unabashed obstructionism. You wanna play the game?', ">>{KleptocracyII} : I don't like Sessions but if the situation was reversed and it was a democratic administration being asked these type of questions I would want the same thing. A special prosecutor. Expecting him to resign at this point isn't right. If he resigns he will more than likely disappear from the investigation.I'd love to see Sessions under oath answering a special prosecutors questions. Letting a republican congress handle it is lunacy."]]

classify and reply

['>>{delreyloveXO} : Why iOS is wasting my 3 gb quoted mobile data?', '>>{Exwind} : Most likely wifi assist. Uses cellular when wifi drops.', '>>{longteethjim} : Gary Johnson on Clinton Foundation: ‘There is a big pay for play out there’', ">>{5kPercentSure} : Wifi assist only only uses a lot of cellular data if you frequently use a poor wifi connection. If wifi drops completely then it's going to use cellular even if wifi assist is off. I always leave Wifi assist on and it never uses more than 10MB per month. Often only 1 or 2 MB.", '>>{RIDEO} : Trudeau stays polite as Trump rages against NATO and NAFTA', ">>{truthhurts4444} : Of course there is. Corruption is the most natural thing in the world to a Clinton. It's too bad Hillary can't stop acting like a Clinton and start acting like a human being", '>>{an_alphas_opinion} : We know there is Gary. We know. Anyone who denies it is nothing more than a partisan. And deep down, they know too.', '>>{Dontblinkdoc} : There must have been issues with OPs wifi I guess.', '>>{ReverendKen} : So tell me which candidate is above corruption? Trump is most certainly corrupt and perhaps more so than Clinton. Johnson has shown himself to be corrupt as well. Jill Stein is just a fool so who cares if she is corrupt?', '>>{Axelph} : Go to settings, iCloud, and then iCloud Drive. Turn off WhatsApp or celular data altogether. The thing is, apps can backup to iCloud Drive without prompt, which is usually why you end up with no data at the end of the day. In my case WhatsApp was the culprit.', ">>{7w9-} : It's not 2015 anymore. It's 2016. Checkmate.", ">>{johnthebold2} : We know there isn't Alpha. We know there isn't. Anyone who thinks there is is nothing more than a partisan. And deep down, they know there isn't too.", '>>{joker68} : Trump is corrupt because you say so. Anything Trump may have done or not done was as a private citizen not while serving as secretary of state.', '>>{boughtadellxps} : if you kill your enemies, they win!', ">>{conanthecnidarian} : But Trump said he donated $100K and she came to his wedding. She's real corrupt going to people's wedding for money.", '>>{mindcracked} : omfg you guise i went to the clintin foundashun today and there was a big spooky scary skellinton in their! he danced his bones and said "emails"', '>>{ReverendKen} : Well for one thing he sells out taxpayers to big business. Then there is the facade of him being a libertarian. He is not in favor of libertarian ideals but he is in favor of a small federal government so the states can tell people what they can and cannot do.', '>>{IAmInAComa} : Trump is for NATO members stepping up to meet their obligations. Trump is for tearing up NAFTA and replacing it with something fairer, better. So am I. So are most American voters. These are two of the many reasons so many people will vote for Trump. It is also a good reason not to vote for Hillary. NAFTA was signed into law by her husband and she will place him in charge of our economy because "He knows how to do it". And she likes the status quo where NATO is concerned. Has no problem with the US footing the bill for NATO.', '>>{mcelen} : Başlığı okuyunca heh dedim sadece bizde degil baksa ülkelerdede insanlar mobil veri kullanımına dikkat etmek zorunda. Sonradan farkettim ki operatör Türk Telekom :(', ">>{smeestisaton} : Where is that breakdown on IOS? Didn't know that existed", ">>{TheGreatPrimate} : That was Bush's and tried to fast track it before his presidency ran out, Clinton signed it but congress passed it republican house and senate with many provisions. I agree with you on nafta but don't change history to make a point.", '>>{ReverendKen} : Read about his business practices and come to logical conclusions. Edit: Here is a good one. Trump took an illegal loan from his father to try to save his casinos. He paid a $65,000.00 fine for doing so. That is a fact.', ">>{SiberianShibe} : We know Gary. Problem is Clinton does things with a wink wink nudge nudge so while everyone knows she's corrupt the Clintrolls will still scream she didn't do anything wrong.", ">>{Althestrasz} : I wouldn't recommend turning off WhatsApp, as it will prohibit chat back-ups. Turning of iCloud Drive syncing over cellular seems like a good idea.", '>>{IAmInAComa} : All I said was a true statement of fact. President Clinton signed NAFTA ino law.', '>>{GravitasIsOverrated} : > NATO members stepping up to meet their obligations The spending targets are not obligations, only targets, and were put into place with the explicit recognition that not everybody may be able to meet them. Furthermore, they\'re targets for the year 2024, not today. Furthermore, the only country that has *ever* activated Article 5 was the US after 9/11 for the invasion of Afghanistan (Even Estonia sent soldiers to assist), so we are certainly not "footing the bill" for other countries as you said.', ">>{Axelph} : That's what I meant. Sorry if my wording gave out the wrong idea.", '>>{I_AM_shill} : Plenty of evidence for conflict of interest at least. She would be in jail in some other countries. See that Rajiv guy and the David Brock "defence". In some countries she would laughed out all the way to jail. Just no in the USA.', ">>{curxxx} : Settings.app -> Cellular Data -> (Scroll down through all your app's usage) -> System Services. Yeah it's nice iOS gives you a breakdown of everything. :)", '>>{D0neWithIt} : My small business (we gross $250K to 500K a year) was able to expand dramatically because of NAFTA. We design high-end industrial valves and equipment all manufactured here in the USA and we can sell it to Canada and Mexico without tariffs. We expanded chiefly due to our import business and doubled our staff since NAFTA was passed. The manufacturing plant that makes our top product has also expanded to a second facility (here in the U.S.) We were able to weather the repeated crises of government shutdowns and failures to pass highway bills (industrial construction is a major sector of our business here in the U.S.) due to our ability to supply duty-free equipment to Canada. "Most voters" have no idea what impact NAFTA has because they didn\'t read the treaty and they don\'t have anything valuable to offer to the international market. I was one of many conservatives pushing for NAFTA. I\'m one of a few conservatives walking away from the Republican Party today because it has clearly been taken over by orangutans.', '>>{joker68} : Dont care. Never voting for the democrat criminal piece of shit. Trumps got my vote.', '>>{ozric101} : >The spending targets are not obligations, only targets NATO is only a treaty not an obligation.. See how that works.', '>>{IncognitoIsBetter} : Gary Johnson is for NAFTA and now TPP, that would expand the barrier free zone to 11 other countries in the Pacific Rim. I hope you consider him. /r/GaryJohnson', ">>{vivalabam13} : Op and there's the truth. You know Trump is corrupt but for some reason it's ok when he does it, as long as he's not the shedevil am I right???", ">>{ithasanh} : Wow, it's almost like the other side makes the same argument for Clinton or something", '>>{SiberianShibe} : Since when was taking a loan from your father illegal? Got a source on that? (Not that I doubt you I just want to know under what circumstances that is Illegal)', ">>{liberationation} : Again, where has he received moneys or gifts in exchange for favors? Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't make them corrupt.", ">>{ReverendKen} : Casinos are only allowed to receive loans from approved lenders. Trump's Father sent a person into the casino to buy 3 million dollars in chips and never cashed them in so they knew they were breaking the law. http://articles.philly.com/1991-04-09/news/25780577_1_casino-control-act-donald-trump-casino-owners", ">>{IAmInAComa} : The net result of NAFTA on our Economy was losing businesses and jobs to other countries. Good for you to have done well with it. Sayonara (if it must be so, literally) to you. Us oranges don't need people like you.", '>>{ReverendKen} : Vote your conscience. I would never try to tell you who to vote for. I just wish we had a decent choice. I think None of the Above is the best choice this year.', '>>{DrRat} : He said during his Joe Rogan interview that he has had one or two donors call him upset that he didn\'t vote their way after taking their donation - Gary replied he would be happy to reimburse them the donation money in full. Remember, this is the guy who said "if you never lie you never have to remember anything."', '>>{SiberianShibe} : Thanks. Just FYI. That source says it was a $30k fine. Also, it seems as though his father thought it was ok. Ended up paying less than the interest of a loan so it looks like they still made a good move even though they had to pay a fine.', '>>{DrRat} : I\'m voting for Hillary because she\'s not Trump; "I\'m voting for Trump because he\'s not Hillary." Meanwhile I\'m over here: "I\'m voting for Johnson because of his ideas and integrity...oh, and because he\'s not Trump OR Hillary."', '>>{ClockClucker} : Complete and utter bullshit. The whole of the "evidence" for conflict of interest is that she had meetings with people who also gave money to the foundation. As for Rajiv Fernando, I direct you to his Wikipedia page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raj_Fernando >Fernando’s expertise in financial systems aligns with ISAB work related to financial security, including a 2014 ISAB report that was released regarding cyber security in the financial industry.[10] Fernando has also held memberships on other national security boards, including the board of directors for the American Security Project, the Foreign Policy Leadership Committee at the Brookings Institution and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.[1][3]', '>>{ithasanh} : Same for me, but with Stein. However, I respect your vote for Gary Johnson and acknowledge it as your vote and yours alone!', '>>{ReverendKen} : You are right disagreeing with me does not make a person corrupt. The way he ran the finances as Governor does.', '>>{liberationation} : Again, where as governor did he accept bribes?', '>>{ReverendKen} : Well my memory seems to be getting a little worse over the last few years so forgive me the error of the size of the fine. Our topic was Trump\'s ethics not the Fathers so I do not care what dear old dad thought. If Trump thought it was legal then he is guilty of being an idiot. That is not that much better than being a crook when one is running for President. Trump ended up declaring bankruptcy because he could not pay off his loans that is not what I would call a success no matter the interest rates. While we are on the subject of interest rates Trump financed the casinos with junk bonds at very high interest rates. Certainly not what a good business man does. He paid way too much for them as well. So much for "The Art of the Deal".', '>>{ReverendKen} : So accepting bribes is the only form of corruption?', ">>{SiberianShibe} : Well not to split hairs again....but he declared bankruptcy not because he couldn't afford it, it was because the business wasn't succeeding. His businesses are incorporated so his personal liability is excluded in bankruptcy. One could view this as a last ditch effort to try to save a business and jobs with his own families funds, which isn't so horrible imho.", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Comes with the territory. Deals get made, palms get greased. As old as politics itself. That aspect never bothered me. It's the constant ignoring of the economic BS that average Americans have to endure day in and day out that bugs me. All we get are platitudes while our health care costs are breaking our backs. I don't care if they play their games. It's just that somewhere along the line the concerns of average Americans were completely discarded from the equation.", '>>{poetiq} : Depends on what you mean by "pay to play." If you want to be pedantic, "pay to play" doesn\'t require any favors, it simply means you have to "pay to play." To be fair, most of the US Government is "pay to play." That\'s why there are lobbyists. It\'s pretty much legal. Now, if you\'re asking if what she did was any better or worse than what other politicians already do, then currently there\'s no evidence of that. But if you\'re defending her (not you specifically, the general you) and saying she isn\'t and won\'t be influenced by big money interests? Then I would direct you to a speech from Joe Biden in February demanding more from the Democratic Party. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d12_XpymTB8 [2:31] > "So folks. What are we doing. What are we doing. We\'re cutting off access... for so many of you. For so many bright young minds. Who the only way they can get engaged is you have to go where the money is. And where the money is, there\'s almost always implicitly some string attached. No one buys anybody directly. That doesn\'t happen. If it does it\'s rare. But it\'s awful hard... to take a whole lot of money from a group that you know has a particular position, and if you conclude that they\'re wrong, vote no. So ladies and gentleman, I predict one day, the American people are going to wake up, and they\'re going to demand change." [5:03] > "You outta be demanding of all of us. All of us. Because at least in our own party fights, among ourselves, in primaries, that we adhere to a policy that doesn\'t rest on millionaires and billionaires. > They\'re good people. They not bad per say. No I really mean it. But it\'s a hell of a way to run a democracy. > So the first place you got to start is in the Democratic Party. No matter how much you love me or somebody else, you have to demand of us, that we demonstrate, we understand."', ">>{liberationation} : He's desperate to deflect from Hillary's shady engagements, it's sad. I feel sorry for Clinton voters who feel compelled to defend her, at least Trump supporters can enjoy the blissful ignorance of youth.", ">>{poetiq} : No one is above corruption. There is even a study that shows that there is a direct correlation between power and corruption. To me, Johnson comes across as the least corrupt. But maybe it's because he hasn't had as much power as the other two.", '>>{I_AM_shill} : I love it when people defend Raj. This [10] reference points to media matters, founded and under direct control of David Brock, you may also know him from "Correct The Record" and no other media would even touch the material they fabricated. Raj barely knows how to use Office, they asked him about it on CNN. Also he is not an expert in cyber security, they "corrected the record" there. He is an expert in financial securities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_(finance) Awesome right? ll those other boards that he was in were a fabrication after the fact and were state department controlled, which only adds fuel to the fire not the opposite. EDIT: LOL, got banned from this sub for 7 days, again. Good job CTR.', ">>{Bluthhousing} : >Well for one thing he sells out taxpayers to big business How so? >he is in favor of a small federal government so the states can tell people what they can and cannot do. Isn't it easier to change your state government than the feds? And as far as I know, he's advocating for less interference government in ways actually relevant to peoples lives, like being abe to get an abortion and not being locked up in jail for doing drugs.", '>>{DrRat} : Under Things I Can Say About My Candidate: My candidate doesn\'t have a 50+ person ["Body Count"](http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php) online.', '>>{ReverendKen} : Look up his record of Governor. If you honestly wanted to know the answer to your question you would have done this already.', '>>{ReverendKen} : Least corrupt is still corrupt, do you agree?', '>>{ReverendKen} : Deals being made and palms getting greased is still corruption. The fact that it does not bother you tells me a little about your ethics.', ">>{ReverendKen} : It is not that you are splitting hairs it is that you have no understanding of business. I have to say I laughed when I read your words about his business not succeeding. You do know we are talking about casinos, right? As for trying to save jobs I think there are enough stories about how Trump treats his employees to know that was not on his mind. Even if it was he still BROKE THE LAW. We are discussing a person's ethics and you seem to be defending him by saying he had a reason to be corrupt. Do you have a clue as to why this is a losing argument?", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Stay out politics then. Ain't no clean government and never has been. It's about relationships and who you know. Especially the local stuff.", ">>{Bluthhousing} : They seemed to like him in New Mexico. He cut taxes and vetoed spending bills. He advocated legalizing marijuana and expanding school vouchers which I support. He used the EPA to stop General Electric and Molycorp from polluting New Mexico. The worst thing to say about Johnson was that he advocated for Private prisons, which was a new idea at the time. The experiment hasn't worked well, but towards the end of the fusion townhall I thought he did a good job of laying out what the situation was at the time (New Mexico had a prison problem and needed reform) and he said he wants to know of any abuses and wouldn't pursue that policy if the problems were systemic. Because as a candidate he would do the most to reduce our prison population, I believe him.", ">>{SiberianShibe} : You're the only one to seem to not have an understanding of business. They take advantage wherever they can. They take advantage of laws whenever they can. Anything otherwise would be inefficient and uncapitalistic. We are definitely not talking personal ethics. You seem to be, but not me. LOL!", '>>{poetiq} : I like Gary Johnson, but I would be lying to myself if I were to try and prop him up as a saint. He hasn\'t been through the same paces, so I don\'t want to put myself in a position where I have to backtrack, making a baseless claim. So I agree. The lesser of two (or three) evils is still evil. That being said, I feel there are sincere reasons to support him beyond not wanting Clinton or Trump to win. I like this quote from Penn Jillette. This Libertarian viewpoint is one of the reasons I am supporting Gary Johnson in 2016. > "Let\'s stop spending money we don\'t have, to kill people we don\'t know, for reasons we don\'t understand" It\'s not one you get to hear that often, since it\'s not as controversial of a viewpoint.', '>>{-LetterToTheRedditor} : - How does contributing to a 2014 report speak to his qualifications in 2011? - How many of those boards did Fernando serve on in 2011? - Is the Chicago Council you mention there the same one he is a known donor of?', ">>{-LetterToTheRedditor} : The thing about formal investigations. You don't need proof because it is exceptionally difficult to get proof through legal means without launching an investigation. That is why you just need probable cause. Guess we'll see what happens.", ">>{VIRMD} : I can't wrap my head around that fact that anyone could consider voting for a Hillary or a Trump when /r/GaryJohnson is out there...", ">>{-LetterToTheRedditor} : I guess we'll see whether you are right. But if you are wrong and an investigation is launched, will you keep an open-mind to the idea that Clinton and/or agents of the State Department or Clinton Foundation *may* have committed a crime?", '>>{ritchie70} : Policies you don\'t agree with aren\'t corruption. They\'re just disagreements. Put up or shut up. What\'s corrupt about Johnson? Edit: "Put up or shut up" is an American colloquialism, not an insult. Just in case someone thinks I\'m being rude.', ">>{EconG} : Some countries, like Denmark, actually do manage to steer clear of almost every sort of corruption. It's all about trust, and maybe if presidential candidates stopped race baiting and dividing, it would stand a chance.", ">>{StupidStudentVeteran} : What a cop out answer. You're the one making the claims. YOU provide the sources. That's how it is done every where from school to business.", '>>{EvansCantStop} : Additionally, Johnson has shown considerably more honesty that he may change his opinion as he learns more on a topic. This is important, if not necessary, in government officials as they are not always experts in complex issues. To me, this means he will listen to people who are experts, whose lives are to study these issues and advice policy, but are often ignored.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : Ok, but when over 50% of her meetings with non-government officials (corporate or private entities) are also donors to the foundation it does give off an awfully corrupt smell.', ">>{gruntznclickz} : Let me explain: His fiscal policies are insane. The problem with our country, that corporations are able to buy our government/representatives, would only get worse under a libertarian government. I agree with him totally on social issues, leave people alone. Libertarians are short sighted and selfish when it comes to money and I can't support it.", ">>{LOLELECTRONICS} : Bernie was. Or, at least he was the only one who criticized corporate money in politics and ran his campaign without the need for said corporate donations. But, unfortunately that wasn't the most important issue for voters.", ">>{nathanb131} : You have the corporation influence part backwards. The larger the scale and scope of government, the more incentive firms have to 'buy' influence. I can understand the anti-libertarian argument of wanting government to heavily regulate the economy, but that will ALWAYS come hand-in-hand with increased lobbying. There used to be a time when we broke up monopolies that controlled markets once companies got too big. Now big corporations are basically cartels that help write regulations to make it harder for new companies to compete on their turf. Being against corporate influence is one of the top reasons I'm a Libertarian. I do also have a soft-spot for safety nets too and that's probably my biggest conflict. I really like the idea of Universal Basic Income, which was originally a libertarian idea. There's a lot of 'liberaltarians' who are okay with the idea of redistribution as long as it doesn't involve people picking who 'deserves' what with their own biases. UBI also does aware with the conflicting work incentives in general welfare programs.", '>>{gruntznclickz} : They want to get rid of, basically, all regulations. This declaws the government, and therefore, the people, of any power to regulate the actions of corporations. I do understand the argument of "if government is powerful people will use money to gain access to the power and then use the power to benefit themselves" but the libertarian "solution", "make government powerless so that no one can buy that power" is short sighted. Libertarians love to claim this would somehow bring about good. All we have to do is go look back at how things were before government regulations. Things like the meat industry, working conditions, snake oil salesmen, etc. It was not a better time. What would stop those same things from occurring today if we got rid of regulations? Yes, I realize there are still products being sold that do not do what they promise and there are still occurrences of industries flouting regulations, but without regulation at all it would be a free for all.', ">>{d00ns} : > His fiscal policies are insane. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but luckily we have a record of his policies in action. In practice they were great. He was governor of New Mexico for 8 years. He decreased taxes and spending, yet government services didn't decline.", ">>{d00ns} : > They want to get rid of, basically, all regulations. Since the regulations were written by corporate lobbyists, don't you want to get rid of them too?", '>>{gruntznclickz} : No, I want them rewritten to get rid of "special cases" for specific companies and industries and enforced vigorously. What I don\'t want is for our government to be completely powerless. If that happens, we the people, will be left hoping and praying that institutions created and run with the *sole purpose* of making as much profit as possible will do the right thing instead of acting in self interest. That\'s a pipe dream. Corporations don\'t care about the environment, you, me, or anything else, just $$$.', ">>{gruntznclickz} : There's the underlying problem of our nation and society... we need to remove all money from politics. All campaigns should be publically financed with a set amount of money for all candidates so that undue influence is removed. Once that happens the actual representatives of the people can write them, it has happened before. Now, instead of only giving me the socratic method, let's apply it to your hypothesis. What about the libertarian ideas counter the effects I brought up? We aren't having a conversation here because you aren't acknowledging anything I'm saying.", ">>{nathanb131} : all regulations? Come on now. That's a worn out straw-man. Libertarians think government should protect people from harming other people...which is precisely the purpose of the consumer and environmental regulations you listed. They are against regulations that impact free trade and commerce. -Ensuring food companies can't sell poison: good regulation -Sugar tariffs that protect a small group of producers at consumer's expense: bad regulation Gary Johnson has made it clear that he's all for increased regulation on food labeling. He's also supports the EPA to protect people and the environment from harm and is even open to a carbon fee. Only the most extreme anarcho capitalist libertarians say things like 'end all regulation!', they are like marxists on the left who call for nationalizing every industry and outlawing personal property. Gary's platform is to reduce federal spending by 20%. There's a massive list of things he'd cut that would easily achieve that goal before safety regulations even entered the conversation.", '>>{ThatIsJustOK} : lets pretend your right. hes still better than trump or hillary. even if you disagree with alot of what he believes', ">>{d00ns} : I agree money in politics is a problem, but even if everything is publically funded, the problem isn't solved. Campaign spending pales in comparison to the billions in free advertising candidates receive from the media. We would also have to ban media agencies from mentioning one candidate more than another, severely restricting the 1st amendment. (I do remember reading about some cities in Europe that actually do this.) As far as regulation, the libertarian argument is to have government write no law, and let the market decide. I think in the information age, this is actually practical and would work much better at regulating bad behavior, though of course, there are flaws in each approach."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{longteethjim} : Gary Johnson on Clinton Foundation: ‘There is a big pay for play out there’', ">>{truthhurts4444} : Of course there is. Corruption is the most natural thing in the world to a Clinton. It's too bad Hillary can't stop acting like a Clinton and start acting like a human being", '>>{an_alphas_opinion} : We know there is Gary. We know. Anyone who denies it is nothing more than a partisan. And deep down, they know too.', '>>{ReverendKen} : So tell me which candidate is above corruption? Trump is most certainly corrupt and perhaps more so than Clinton. Johnson has shown himself to be corrupt as well. Jill Stein is just a fool so who cares if she is corrupt?', ">>{johnthebold2} : We know there isn't Alpha. We know there isn't. Anyone who thinks there is is nothing more than a partisan. And deep down, they know there isn't too.", '>>{joker68} : Trump is corrupt because you say so. Anything Trump may have done or not done was as a private citizen not while serving as secretary of state.', ">>{conanthecnidarian} : But Trump said he donated $100K and she came to his wedding. She's real corrupt going to people's wedding for money.", '>>{mindcracked} : omfg you guise i went to the clintin foundashun today and there was a big spooky scary skellinton in their! he danced his bones and said "emails"', '>>{ReverendKen} : Well for one thing he sells out taxpayers to big business. Then there is the facade of him being a libertarian. He is not in favor of libertarian ideals but he is in favor of a small federal government so the states can tell people what they can and cannot do.', '>>{ReverendKen} : Read about his business practices and come to logical conclusions. Edit: Here is a good one. Trump took an illegal loan from his father to try to save his casinos. He paid a $65,000.00 fine for doing so. That is a fact.', ">>{SiberianShibe} : We know Gary. Problem is Clinton does things with a wink wink nudge nudge so while everyone knows she's corrupt the Clintrolls will still scream she didn't do anything wrong.", '>>{I_AM_shill} : Plenty of evidence for conflict of interest at least. She would be in jail in some other countries. See that Rajiv guy and the David Brock "defence". In some countries she would laughed out all the way to jail. Just no in the USA.', '>>{joker68} : Dont care. Never voting for the democrat criminal piece of shit. Trumps got my vote.', ">>{vivalabam13} : Op and there's the truth. You know Trump is corrupt but for some reason it's ok when he does it, as long as he's not the shedevil am I right???", ">>{ithasanh} : Wow, it's almost like the other side makes the same argument for Clinton or something", '>>{SiberianShibe} : Since when was taking a loan from your father illegal? Got a source on that? (Not that I doubt you I just want to know under what circumstances that is Illegal)', ">>{liberationation} : Again, where has he received moneys or gifts in exchange for favors? Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't make them corrupt.", ">>{ReverendKen} : Casinos are only allowed to receive loans from approved lenders. Trump's Father sent a person into the casino to buy 3 million dollars in chips and never cashed them in so they knew they were breaking the law. http://articles.philly.com/1991-04-09/news/25780577_1_casino-control-act-donald-trump-casino-owners", '>>{ReverendKen} : Vote your conscience. I would never try to tell you who to vote for. I just wish we had a decent choice. I think None of the Above is the best choice this year.', '>>{DrRat} : He said during his Joe Rogan interview that he has had one or two donors call him upset that he didn\'t vote their way after taking their donation - Gary replied he would be happy to reimburse them the donation money in full. Remember, this is the guy who said "if you never lie you never have to remember anything."', '>>{SiberianShibe} : Thanks. Just FYI. That source says it was a $30k fine. Also, it seems as though his father thought it was ok. Ended up paying less than the interest of a loan so it looks like they still made a good move even though they had to pay a fine.', '>>{DrRat} : I\'m voting for Hillary because she\'s not Trump; "I\'m voting for Trump because he\'s not Hillary." Meanwhile I\'m over here: "I\'m voting for Johnson because of his ideas and integrity...oh, and because he\'s not Trump OR Hillary."', '>>{ClockClucker} : Complete and utter bullshit. The whole of the "evidence" for conflict of interest is that she had meetings with people who also gave money to the foundation. As for Rajiv Fernando, I direct you to his Wikipedia page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raj_Fernando >Fernando’s expertise in financial systems aligns with ISAB work related to financial security, including a 2014 ISAB report that was released regarding cyber security in the financial industry.[10] Fernando has also held memberships on other national security boards, including the board of directors for the American Security Project, the Foreign Policy Leadership Committee at the Brookings Institution and the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.[1][3]', '>>{ithasanh} : Same for me, but with Stein. However, I respect your vote for Gary Johnson and acknowledge it as your vote and yours alone!', '>>{ReverendKen} : You are right disagreeing with me does not make a person corrupt. The way he ran the finances as Governor does.', '>>{liberationation} : Again, where as governor did he accept bribes?', '>>{ReverendKen} : Well my memory seems to be getting a little worse over the last few years so forgive me the error of the size of the fine. Our topic was Trump\'s ethics not the Fathers so I do not care what dear old dad thought. If Trump thought it was legal then he is guilty of being an idiot. That is not that much better than being a crook when one is running for President. Trump ended up declaring bankruptcy because he could not pay off his loans that is not what I would call a success no matter the interest rates. While we are on the subject of interest rates Trump financed the casinos with junk bonds at very high interest rates. Certainly not what a good business man does. He paid way too much for them as well. So much for "The Art of the Deal".', '>>{ReverendKen} : So accepting bribes is the only form of corruption?', ">>{SiberianShibe} : Well not to split hairs again....but he declared bankruptcy not because he couldn't afford it, it was because the business wasn't succeeding. His businesses are incorporated so his personal liability is excluded in bankruptcy. One could view this as a last ditch effort to try to save a business and jobs with his own families funds, which isn't so horrible imho.", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Comes with the territory. Deals get made, palms get greased. As old as politics itself. That aspect never bothered me. It's the constant ignoring of the economic BS that average Americans have to endure day in and day out that bugs me. All we get are platitudes while our health care costs are breaking our backs. I don't care if they play their games. It's just that somewhere along the line the concerns of average Americans were completely discarded from the equation.", '>>{poetiq} : Depends on what you mean by "pay to play." If you want to be pedantic, "pay to play" doesn\'t require any favors, it simply means you have to "pay to play." To be fair, most of the US Government is "pay to play." That\'s why there are lobbyists. It\'s pretty much legal. Now, if you\'re asking if what she did was any better or worse than what other politicians already do, then currently there\'s no evidence of that. But if you\'re defending her (not you specifically, the general you) and saying she isn\'t and won\'t be influenced by big money interests? Then I would direct you to a speech from Joe Biden in February demanding more from the Democratic Party. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d12_XpymTB8 [2:31] > "So folks. What are we doing. What are we doing. We\'re cutting off access... for so many of you. For so many bright young minds. Who the only way they can get engaged is you have to go where the money is. And where the money is, there\'s almost always implicitly some string attached. No one buys anybody directly. That doesn\'t happen. If it does it\'s rare. But it\'s awful hard... to take a whole lot of money from a group that you know has a particular position, and if you conclude that they\'re wrong, vote no. So ladies and gentleman, I predict one day, the American people are going to wake up, and they\'re going to demand change." [5:03] > "You outta be demanding of all of us. All of us. Because at least in our own party fights, among ourselves, in primaries, that we adhere to a policy that doesn\'t rest on millionaires and billionaires. > They\'re good people. They not bad per say. No I really mean it. But it\'s a hell of a way to run a democracy. > So the first place you got to start is in the Democratic Party. No matter how much you love me or somebody else, you have to demand of us, that we demonstrate, we understand."', ">>{liberationation} : He's desperate to deflect from Hillary's shady engagements, it's sad. I feel sorry for Clinton voters who feel compelled to defend her, at least Trump supporters can enjoy the blissful ignorance of youth.", ">>{poetiq} : No one is above corruption. There is even a study that shows that there is a direct correlation between power and corruption. To me, Johnson comes across as the least corrupt. But maybe it's because he hasn't had as much power as the other two.", '>>{I_AM_shill} : I love it when people defend Raj. This [10] reference points to media matters, founded and under direct control of David Brock, you may also know him from "Correct The Record" and no other media would even touch the material they fabricated. Raj barely knows how to use Office, they asked him about it on CNN. Also he is not an expert in cyber security, they "corrected the record" there. He is an expert in financial securities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_(finance) Awesome right? ll those other boards that he was in were a fabrication after the fact and were state department controlled, which only adds fuel to the fire not the opposite. EDIT: LOL, got banned from this sub for 7 days, again. Good job CTR.', ">>{Bluthhousing} : >Well for one thing he sells out taxpayers to big business How so? >he is in favor of a small federal government so the states can tell people what they can and cannot do. Isn't it easier to change your state government than the feds? And as far as I know, he's advocating for less interference government in ways actually relevant to peoples lives, like being abe to get an abortion and not being locked up in jail for doing drugs.", '>>{DrRat} : Under Things I Can Say About My Candidate: My candidate doesn\'t have a 50+ person ["Body Count"](http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php) online.', '>>{ReverendKen} : Look up his record of Governor. If you honestly wanted to know the answer to your question you would have done this already.', '>>{ReverendKen} : Least corrupt is still corrupt, do you agree?', '>>{ReverendKen} : Deals being made and palms getting greased is still corruption. The fact that it does not bother you tells me a little about your ethics.', ">>{ReverendKen} : It is not that you are splitting hairs it is that you have no understanding of business. I have to say I laughed when I read your words about his business not succeeding. You do know we are talking about casinos, right? As for trying to save jobs I think there are enough stories about how Trump treats his employees to know that was not on his mind. Even if it was he still BROKE THE LAW. We are discussing a person's ethics and you seem to be defending him by saying he had a reason to be corrupt. Do you have a clue as to why this is a losing argument?", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Stay out politics then. Ain't no clean government and never has been. It's about relationships and who you know. Especially the local stuff.", ">>{Bluthhousing} : They seemed to like him in New Mexico. He cut taxes and vetoed spending bills. He advocated legalizing marijuana and expanding school vouchers which I support. He used the EPA to stop General Electric and Molycorp from polluting New Mexico. The worst thing to say about Johnson was that he advocated for Private prisons, which was a new idea at the time. The experiment hasn't worked well, but towards the end of the fusion townhall I thought he did a good job of laying out what the situation was at the time (New Mexico had a prison problem and needed reform) and he said he wants to know of any abuses and wouldn't pursue that policy if the problems were systemic. Because as a candidate he would do the most to reduce our prison population, I believe him.", ">>{SiberianShibe} : You're the only one to seem to not have an understanding of business. They take advantage wherever they can. They take advantage of laws whenever they can. Anything otherwise would be inefficient and uncapitalistic. We are definitely not talking personal ethics. You seem to be, but not me. LOL!", '>>{poetiq} : I like Gary Johnson, but I would be lying to myself if I were to try and prop him up as a saint. He hasn\'t been through the same paces, so I don\'t want to put myself in a position where I have to backtrack, making a baseless claim. So I agree. The lesser of two (or three) evils is still evil. That being said, I feel there are sincere reasons to support him beyond not wanting Clinton or Trump to win. I like this quote from Penn Jillette. This Libertarian viewpoint is one of the reasons I am supporting Gary Johnson in 2016. > "Let\'s stop spending money we don\'t have, to kill people we don\'t know, for reasons we don\'t understand" It\'s not one you get to hear that often, since it\'s not as controversial of a viewpoint.', '>>{-LetterToTheRedditor} : - How does contributing to a 2014 report speak to his qualifications in 2011? - How many of those boards did Fernando serve on in 2011? - Is the Chicago Council you mention there the same one he is a known donor of?', ">>{-LetterToTheRedditor} : The thing about formal investigations. You don't need proof because it is exceptionally difficult to get proof through legal means without launching an investigation. That is why you just need probable cause. Guess we'll see what happens.", ">>{VIRMD} : I can't wrap my head around that fact that anyone could consider voting for a Hillary or a Trump when /r/GaryJohnson is out there...", ">>{-LetterToTheRedditor} : I guess we'll see whether you are right. But if you are wrong and an investigation is launched, will you keep an open-mind to the idea that Clinton and/or agents of the State Department or Clinton Foundation *may* have committed a crime?", '>>{ritchie70} : Policies you don\'t agree with aren\'t corruption. They\'re just disagreements. Put up or shut up. What\'s corrupt about Johnson? Edit: "Put up or shut up" is an American colloquialism, not an insult. Just in case someone thinks I\'m being rude.', ">>{EconG} : Some countries, like Denmark, actually do manage to steer clear of almost every sort of corruption. It's all about trust, and maybe if presidential candidates stopped race baiting and dividing, it would stand a chance.", ">>{StupidStudentVeteran} : What a cop out answer. You're the one making the claims. YOU provide the sources. That's how it is done every where from school to business.", '>>{EvansCantStop} : Additionally, Johnson has shown considerably more honesty that he may change his opinion as he learns more on a topic. This is important, if not necessary, in government officials as they are not always experts in complex issues. To me, this means he will listen to people who are experts, whose lives are to study these issues and advice policy, but are often ignored.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : Ok, but when over 50% of her meetings with non-government officials (corporate or private entities) are also donors to the foundation it does give off an awfully corrupt smell.', ">>{gruntznclickz} : Let me explain: His fiscal policies are insane. The problem with our country, that corporations are able to buy our government/representatives, would only get worse under a libertarian government. I agree with him totally on social issues, leave people alone. Libertarians are short sighted and selfish when it comes to money and I can't support it.", ">>{LOLELECTRONICS} : Bernie was. Or, at least he was the only one who criticized corporate money in politics and ran his campaign without the need for said corporate donations. But, unfortunately that wasn't the most important issue for voters.", ">>{nathanb131} : You have the corporation influence part backwards. The larger the scale and scope of government, the more incentive firms have to 'buy' influence. I can understand the anti-libertarian argument of wanting government to heavily regulate the economy, but that will ALWAYS come hand-in-hand with increased lobbying. There used to be a time when we broke up monopolies that controlled markets once companies got too big. Now big corporations are basically cartels that help write regulations to make it harder for new companies to compete on their turf. Being against corporate influence is one of the top reasons I'm a Libertarian. I do also have a soft-spot for safety nets too and that's probably my biggest conflict. I really like the idea of Universal Basic Income, which was originally a libertarian idea. There's a lot of 'liberaltarians' who are okay with the idea of redistribution as long as it doesn't involve people picking who 'deserves' what with their own biases. UBI also does aware with the conflicting work incentives in general welfare programs.", '>>{gruntznclickz} : They want to get rid of, basically, all regulations. This declaws the government, and therefore, the people, of any power to regulate the actions of corporations. I do understand the argument of "if government is powerful people will use money to gain access to the power and then use the power to benefit themselves" but the libertarian "solution", "make government powerless so that no one can buy that power" is short sighted. Libertarians love to claim this would somehow bring about good. All we have to do is go look back at how things were before government regulations. Things like the meat industry, working conditions, snake oil salesmen, etc. It was not a better time. What would stop those same things from occurring today if we got rid of regulations? Yes, I realize there are still products being sold that do not do what they promise and there are still occurrences of industries flouting regulations, but without regulation at all it would be a free for all.', ">>{d00ns} : > His fiscal policies are insane. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but luckily we have a record of his policies in action. In practice they were great. He was governor of New Mexico for 8 years. He decreased taxes and spending, yet government services didn't decline.", ">>{d00ns} : > They want to get rid of, basically, all regulations. Since the regulations were written by corporate lobbyists, don't you want to get rid of them too?", '>>{gruntznclickz} : No, I want them rewritten to get rid of "special cases" for specific companies and industries and enforced vigorously. What I don\'t want is for our government to be completely powerless. If that happens, we the people, will be left hoping and praying that institutions created and run with the *sole purpose* of making as much profit as possible will do the right thing instead of acting in self interest. That\'s a pipe dream. Corporations don\'t care about the environment, you, me, or anything else, just $$$.', ">>{gruntznclickz} : There's the underlying problem of our nation and society... we need to remove all money from politics. All campaigns should be publically financed with a set amount of money for all candidates so that undue influence is removed. Once that happens the actual representatives of the people can write them, it has happened before. Now, instead of only giving me the socratic method, let's apply it to your hypothesis. What about the libertarian ideas counter the effects I brought up? We aren't having a conversation here because you aren't acknowledging anything I'm saying.", ">>{nathanb131} : all regulations? Come on now. That's a worn out straw-man. Libertarians think government should protect people from harming other people...which is precisely the purpose of the consumer and environmental regulations you listed. They are against regulations that impact free trade and commerce. -Ensuring food companies can't sell poison: good regulation -Sugar tariffs that protect a small group of producers at consumer's expense: bad regulation Gary Johnson has made it clear that he's all for increased regulation on food labeling. He's also supports the EPA to protect people and the environment from harm and is even open to a carbon fee. Only the most extreme anarcho capitalist libertarians say things like 'end all regulation!', they are like marxists on the left who call for nationalizing every industry and outlawing personal property. Gary's platform is to reduce federal spending by 20%. There's a massive list of things he'd cut that would easily achieve that goal before safety regulations even entered the conversation.", '>>{ThatIsJustOK} : lets pretend your right. hes still better than trump or hillary. even if you disagree with alot of what he believes', ">>{d00ns} : I agree money in politics is a problem, but even if everything is publically funded, the problem isn't solved. Campaign spending pales in comparison to the billions in free advertising candidates receive from the media. We would also have to ban media agencies from mentioning one candidate more than another, severely restricting the 1st amendment. (I do remember reading about some cities in Europe that actually do this.) As far as regulation, the libertarian argument is to have government write no law, and let the market decide. I think in the information age, this is actually practical and would work much better at regulating bad behavior, though of course, there are flaws in each approach."], ['>>{delreyloveXO} : Why iOS is wasting my 3 gb quoted mobile data?', '>>{Exwind} : Most likely wifi assist. Uses cellular when wifi drops.', ">>{5kPercentSure} : Wifi assist only only uses a lot of cellular data if you frequently use a poor wifi connection. If wifi drops completely then it's going to use cellular even if wifi assist is off. I always leave Wifi assist on and it never uses more than 10MB per month. Often only 1 or 2 MB.", '>>{Dontblinkdoc} : There must have been issues with OPs wifi I guess.', '>>{Axelph} : Go to settings, iCloud, and then iCloud Drive. Turn off WhatsApp or celular data altogether. The thing is, apps can backup to iCloud Drive without prompt, which is usually why you end up with no data at the end of the day. In my case WhatsApp was the culprit.', '>>{mcelen} : Başlığı okuyunca heh dedim sadece bizde degil baksa ülkelerdede insanlar mobil veri kullanımına dikkat etmek zorunda. Sonradan farkettim ki operatör Türk Telekom :(', ">>{smeestisaton} : Where is that breakdown on IOS? Didn't know that existed", ">>{Althestrasz} : I wouldn't recommend turning off WhatsApp, as it will prohibit chat back-ups. Turning of iCloud Drive syncing over cellular seems like a good idea.", ">>{Axelph} : That's what I meant. Sorry if my wording gave out the wrong idea.", ">>{curxxx} : Settings.app -> Cellular Data -> (Scroll down through all your app's usage) -> System Services. Yeah it's nice iOS gives you a breakdown of everything. :)"], ['>>{RIDEO} : Trudeau stays polite as Trump rages against NATO and NAFTA', ">>{7w9-} : It's not 2015 anymore. It's 2016. Checkmate.", '>>{boughtadellxps} : if you kill your enemies, they win!', '>>{IAmInAComa} : Trump is for NATO members stepping up to meet their obligations. Trump is for tearing up NAFTA and replacing it with something fairer, better. So am I. So are most American voters. These are two of the many reasons so many people will vote for Trump. It is also a good reason not to vote for Hillary. NAFTA was signed into law by her husband and she will place him in charge of our economy because "He knows how to do it". And she likes the status quo where NATO is concerned. Has no problem with the US footing the bill for NATO.', ">>{TheGreatPrimate} : That was Bush's and tried to fast track it before his presidency ran out, Clinton signed it but congress passed it republican house and senate with many provisions. I agree with you on nafta but don't change history to make a point.", '>>{IAmInAComa} : All I said was a true statement of fact. President Clinton signed NAFTA ino law.', '>>{GravitasIsOverrated} : > NATO members stepping up to meet their obligations The spending targets are not obligations, only targets, and were put into place with the explicit recognition that not everybody may be able to meet them. Furthermore, they\'re targets for the year 2024, not today. Furthermore, the only country that has *ever* activated Article 5 was the US after 9/11 for the invasion of Afghanistan (Even Estonia sent soldiers to assist), so we are certainly not "footing the bill" for other countries as you said.', '>>{D0neWithIt} : My small business (we gross $250K to 500K a year) was able to expand dramatically because of NAFTA. We design high-end industrial valves and equipment all manufactured here in the USA and we can sell it to Canada and Mexico without tariffs. We expanded chiefly due to our import business and doubled our staff since NAFTA was passed. The manufacturing plant that makes our top product has also expanded to a second facility (here in the U.S.) We were able to weather the repeated crises of government shutdowns and failures to pass highway bills (industrial construction is a major sector of our business here in the U.S.) due to our ability to supply duty-free equipment to Canada. "Most voters" have no idea what impact NAFTA has because they didn\'t read the treaty and they don\'t have anything valuable to offer to the international market. I was one of many conservatives pushing for NAFTA. I\'m one of a few conservatives walking away from the Republican Party today because it has clearly been taken over by orangutans.', '>>{ozric101} : >The spending targets are not obligations, only targets NATO is only a treaty not an obligation.. See how that works.', '>>{IncognitoIsBetter} : Gary Johnson is for NAFTA and now TPP, that would expand the barrier free zone to 11 other countries in the Pacific Rim. I hope you consider him. /r/GaryJohnson', ">>{IAmInAComa} : The net result of NAFTA on our Economy was losing businesses and jobs to other countries. Good for you to have done well with it. Sayonara (if it must be so, literally) to you. Us oranges don't need people like you."]]

classify and reply

['>>{loki8481} : I think Warren played her cards perfectly to get the attention and press associated with being considered for VP, but I think that if she *actually* wanted the job, she would have endorsed Clinton before the Massachusetts primary.', '>>{thc1967} : Now there\'s an interesting question: Who do we think is on the "short list"? Warren could be there. I doubt Bernie would be. I wonder which Senators Clinton is close to...', ">>{TheGumOnYourShoe} : No, because at the time she was still unsure if Bernie had a chance of winning the ticket. If so you would now see Warren warming up to Bernie by endorsing him. She is turning into nothing more than an opportunist seeking politician I'm afraid it seems. At least with Bernie she aligned closer, but Hillary? o_O", ">>{Real_Muthsera} : We understood that Warren was intended for this role when she didn't endorse Sanders before Super Tuesday. Had she done so right before Iowa. We would likely look at a Sanders nomination. It would more than likely have flipped Iowa and Nevada. A much needed early momentum for Sanders that he could have carried much better into the southern states.", ">>{119-92-6734} : Does Warren carry a lot of sway in Iowa and Nevada? I think you're giving too much credit to endorsements. Your comment is basically blaming her for Sanders' loss.", ">>{Claritypleas} : > We would likely look at a Sanders nomination I am a Bernie supporter. I've said so many times here, but no, we wouldn't be looking a Sanders nomination. It is a possibility, perhaps, but the early Sanders campaign was poorly organized and run, that is why he didn't have early momentum.", ">>{thc1967} : > You make real change by working within the system. Yeah, because Bernie fighting the system tooth and nail against the system, especially during this election cycle, didn't change a damned thing, amirite?", '>>{thc1967} : We could be in an honest to gosh 3 party system, or one that could be that by the next election.', ">>{Real_Muthsera} : The key isn't the voters themselves. It is the media attention and the credibility that would bring to the campaign.", '>>{thc1967} : > Bernie accomplished a total of bupkiss until he joined a major political party ["Bupkiss" defined](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/24/bernie-s/bernie-sanders-was-roll-call-amendment-king-1995-2/)', ">>{thc1967} : Go ahead and minimize it. Suck on that Clinton booty all the way to November when Trump beats her by a hair's width and enjoy the result. Bernie's miscalculation was that he thought he would need to be on a major party ticket to raise the funds necessary to make a real run. If he would have been able to predict the level of popular support he achieved, maybe he could have changed things even more.", ">>{degausse} : > media attention HuffPo doesn't carry that much sway in Iowa and Nevada either.", '>>{degausse} : > If he would have been able to predict the level of popular support he achieved, maybe he could have changed things even more. He achieved that level of popular support *because* he was running as a Democrat. If he were running in a third party on a national level (not just Vermont) no one would have paid him any attention whatsoever.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{loki8481} : I think Warren played her cards perfectly to get the attention and press associated with being considered for VP, but I think that if she *actually* wanted the job, she would have endorsed Clinton before the Massachusetts primary.', '>>{thc1967} : Now there\'s an interesting question: Who do we think is on the "short list"? Warren could be there. I doubt Bernie would be. I wonder which Senators Clinton is close to...', ">>{TheGumOnYourShoe} : No, because at the time she was still unsure if Bernie had a chance of winning the ticket. If so you would now see Warren warming up to Bernie by endorsing him. She is turning into nothing more than an opportunist seeking politician I'm afraid it seems. At least with Bernie she aligned closer, but Hillary? o_O", ">>{Real_Muthsera} : We understood that Warren was intended for this role when she didn't endorse Sanders before Super Tuesday. Had she done so right before Iowa. We would likely look at a Sanders nomination. It would more than likely have flipped Iowa and Nevada. A much needed early momentum for Sanders that he could have carried much better into the southern states.", ">>{119-92-6734} : Does Warren carry a lot of sway in Iowa and Nevada? I think you're giving too much credit to endorsements. Your comment is basically blaming her for Sanders' loss.", ">>{Claritypleas} : > We would likely look at a Sanders nomination I am a Bernie supporter. I've said so many times here, but no, we wouldn't be looking a Sanders nomination. It is a possibility, perhaps, but the early Sanders campaign was poorly organized and run, that is why he didn't have early momentum.", ">>{thc1967} : > You make real change by working within the system. Yeah, because Bernie fighting the system tooth and nail against the system, especially during this election cycle, didn't change a damned thing, amirite?", '>>{thc1967} : We could be in an honest to gosh 3 party system, or one that could be that by the next election.', ">>{Real_Muthsera} : The key isn't the voters themselves. It is the media attention and the credibility that would bring to the campaign.", '>>{thc1967} : > Bernie accomplished a total of bupkiss until he joined a major political party ["Bupkiss" defined](http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/24/bernie-s/bernie-sanders-was-roll-call-amendment-king-1995-2/)', ">>{thc1967} : Go ahead and minimize it. Suck on that Clinton booty all the way to November when Trump beats her by a hair's width and enjoy the result. Bernie's miscalculation was that he thought he would need to be on a major party ticket to raise the funds necessary to make a real run. If he would have been able to predict the level of popular support he achieved, maybe he could have changed things even more.", ">>{degausse} : > media attention HuffPo doesn't carry that much sway in Iowa and Nevada either.", '>>{degausse} : > If he would have been able to predict the level of popular support he achieved, maybe he could have changed things even more. He achieved that level of popular support *because* he was running as a Democrat. If he were running in a third party on a national level (not just Vermont) no one would have paid him any attention whatsoever.']]

classify and reply

['>>{talkr_ios} : Honda "Yearbooks" Super Bowl Ad Explained with iOS app Talkr', '>>{MultiKdizzle} : California was so anti-Trump that some Republicans don’t want to include it on the 2016 map', '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : Isn\'t it the classic definition of "circlejerk" to uselessly speculate how impossible scenarios might have changed real events?', '>>{talkr_ios} : Everyone who knows my app talkr (http://talkrapp.com) was asking me how they did the Honda ad, so I figured I would make a video. Here are some "promo codes" for the premium version of the app ($2.99) that let you set up more than 2 faces: * XH3YEY4FLTF3 * HF73JT9P6HRJ * EPTA3JY3LY6R * WMMP6NKXJ3W3 * 6KET7W3XPHWN * PPHEMXM6TW3T Codes expire in 28 days.', ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : The article is talking about the popular vote. It's not questioning the winner.", '>>{LookAtTheFlowers} : They seem to have used. May I have code, please?', ">>{ItsTime4567} : Californians don't want to be on the map, either. A group of them are pushing to secede.", ">>{talkr_ios} : I can provide a few more codes, but I gave 5 codes and only got 3 upvotes! Vote me up, and I'll send out more.", '>>{talkr_ios} : Thanks for the upvotes! Here are 6 more: * EFE447APAHFP * F9EFAKRLAA94 * NNLF44TP9JYY * M7MKJHEJ7XFT * 3M4FR4RY997Y * K6MJFJLTLWKT', '>>{examinati0n} : Thanks for the codes, managed to claim the M7MKJ one.', ">>{talkr_ios} : Thanks for checking out the app and letting everyone know which code you got! For anyone that didn't get a code, I have a few more for folks that download the app (it's free) and leave an honest review on the app store. Have fun making your pictures talk!", '>>{justanormalguy01} : Lol are you serious? "Vote me up," naw fam.', ">>{CaulkusAurelis} : It's speculating aimlessly, about what WOULD'VE happened, if we excluded this group, that state or the other.... Idle fantasy, imagining a reality that didn't/isn't going to happen, in a public forum. Circlejerking, as Reddit likes to call it.", ">>{mspaintshoops} : >In a world of useless election stats, there has been one floating around for the past few weeks that can make a legitimate claim to be the most useless of all. It got fresh pickup over the weekend thanks to Investor's Business Daily, Townhall.com and former congressman Joe Walsh (R-Ill.). Oddly enough, the article is actually in agreement with you about this very issue. Maybe read it?", ">>{toadofsteel} : Some Republicans don't want to include New York on the map either for the same reason. When questioned as to whether they preferred that the First Family reside primarily in what would become a foreign nation, GOP leaders offered no comment.", ">>{Aemon12} : It's the very first paragraph in the article linked to in this post. You're just commenting after reading a headline, and nothing more, to spew self-righteous outrage.", '>>{talkr_ios} : Naw fam indeed. Spent all my time writing this app, and now realizing all the work that goes into getting it noticed. Thankful for the up-votes and visibility from the r/iphone folks though!', ">>{mspaintshoops} : It's the first sentence of the article you're commenting on.", ">>{evillordsoth} : I already own it, so don't need the code. Great app though, doing a helluva job!", '>>{PM_ME_UR_SHOES_GIRL} : California has too many transplants to actually end up seceding unless Trump really does something insaner than his normal insane like repeal the 13th amendment.', '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : Hardly. I READ the parts about excluding the South, and imagining Texas voted a different way than they did. I\'m sorry to burst your ...(what was the term...? "self-righteous?) bubble, but I DID read the article. I suppose I didnt\' recognize the clip you used, and focused more on the parts that seemed to make sense, I.E.: the parts where the author seems to ask WHY would we speculate about a reality that does not exist? I\'ll ask YOU: Why would anyone waste time contemplating a U.S. where California didn\'t vote, or Texas voted a different way?', '>>{Hoppean_Snake_Memes} : They should do so. My guess is within 6 months they turn into Mexico.', '>>{beermile} : Hollywood and Silicon Valley will just pack up and move to Mississippi Edit: guess my /s was not evident', ">>{kogashuko} : Somebody has to pay for all those welfare queen red states. They can't support themselves due to the fact that their economic policies are all bullshit meant to steal as much money and resources as possible for large corporations.", '>>{DayMan4224} : I doubt California would be the only one if that was the case.', '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : > like repeal the 13th amendment. I would like to introduce you to the [Secretary of Hard Labor.](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/08/us/politics/andrew-puzder-labor-secretary-trump.html)', ">>{beermile} : I don't know, but I've usually seen it presented as an argument against those who point out that Trump was significantly behind in the popular vote count. Besides, people like to speculate on shit. What's wrong with that? Take for example, *Old Custer* by Eli Cash. Well, everyone knows Custer died at Little Bighorn. What this book presupposes is... maybe he didn't?", ">>{beermile} : More likely they'd stay right where they are and join with Canada. California has a higher population and stronger economy than the entire country of Canada, after all. None of those people want to move to Mississippi. Fuck that humidity.", '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : > Fuck that humidity. Damn right. SE Humidity is hell.', '>>{flip314} : McMullin made it look like Utah moved from being the reddest state to halfway towards turning blue. Hahaha.', '>>{resultachieved} : Gonna be hard to have a successful US economy without CA.', ">>{pro_skub_neutrality} : Don't forget all the technology and entertainment CA produces.", '>>{bigplrbear} : I got downvoted to hell and back in this sub for predicting that this is exactly how Republicans will justify trump "winning the popular vote".', '>>{xevba} : All the blue states should boycott federal taxes. But none of them has the balls too. Oh how I wish CA and NY teamed up on this. Fuck them all.', ">>{jeanroyall} : Right??? Those red States want to see what it's like without a federal government? Ok, turn off the money pipeline, let's see how they like that.", ">>{jeanroyall} : Dude you got caught, just accept it and move on. The fur quoted the first line of the article at you, agreed with you, and proved you hadn't even bothered to read the article... Go home", ">>{Magic_butt} : Cascadia looking sexier by the day. Republicans couldn't be classy to save their lives. Vindictive children... actually, children have better behavior and a general care for other humans, so that's an insult to children. They got their Pussy-grabber racist in chief yet they're butthurt in droves that everyone isn't bowing down and sucking their dicks. So they want to write off the most populous states in america and tell them they aren't really american. So unamerican and brainless. Its the USA not United states of republican party... or united states of russia, but thank them for admitting where their real alleigances are. They would toss aside american states for Russia. Traitors.", ">>{jeanroyall} : That's the entire point of the article... Speculating on what would have happened if California didn't exist is as pointless as speculating if the entire deep South didn't exist or flipping Texas' electoral votes. Try reading it.", '>>{Magic_butt} : At this point, anyone who defends "Too Smart For Intelligence Breifings" Trump is allowing themselves to be brainwashed. Try not to engage with stupid, they don\'t understand the simplest of concepts. They\'ve been in a self-perpetuated state of baseless rage caused by imaginary persecution for so long that it\'s cooked their brains. It\'s so comical to see people jump through mental gymnastics about why they\'re soooo oppressed because being called racist is "identity politics". They\'re so completely unable and unwilling to understand that minorities, gays, and women have endured far worse than that at the hands of white men, yet they\'re the oppressed ones for being called out on unacceptable behavior. I\'m as lily white as it gets and the only people in my entire life who called me racist were trump addicts online assuming I\'m colored just because I speak out in favor of minority rights and call out racist ideas. They think we are all part of a feminist cult because we speak out for basic women\'s rights. Their brains are jumbled and they spend too much time on the internet searching for shit to feel offended over because they need something to bitch about to distract them from their boring lives. It\'s truly pathetic behavior. If clinton had won, I wouldn\'t seek out trump addicts online to shit in their faces. I would have popped a bottle and continued with my life in peace. Why aren\'t they doing that? They have no life, they are unpleasant people who take pleasure in kicking people when they\'re down. They need someone to blame for their shitty lives so they can pretend they have no choices to better themselves and their problems aren\'t caused by their own actions and horrible attitudes. And that\'s the end of my rant.', '>>{Magic_butt} : This comment is so delusional and shows an extreme misunderstanding of californians.', '>>{Magic_butt} : I think the main thing is that there will be reprecussions for refusing to pay federal taxes which are supposed to be used for the good of the country, instead the federal gv\'t gives them to idiot red states who voted in republicans because "MURICA" even though they promised to fuck over the entire state. I\'d be fine with helping out other states if they weren\'t purposefully fucking themselves in the ass then refusing to learn their lesson. I don\'t believe secession will ever happen for blue states, although I would love to see it. Refusing to pay federal taxes would be the first sign of secession, though. If cali and NY start refusing to pay fed taxes, shit\'s gonna go down. It would be cool to see it go that far, especially since Cali has straight up announced defiance in face of the new regime.', '>>{xevba} : Shit needs to go down. I am sick and tired of living in stupid America.', ">>{Magic_butt} : Republicans love russia more than american states. I don't see how wanting our country and planet to burn is american. America is about diversity and accepting immigrants (see statue of liberty) obviously people don't want that anymore, so the american experiment is failing. I'm embarrassed of what our country has become but proud as fuck of california. I fully support secession. No taxation without representation. 3 million votes uncounted? We'll join canada and maybe they'll appreciate our tax dollars rather than forcing religious laws on us and destroying our only planet. I don't think it will ever happen, but I support it.", '>>{xevba} : Breaking up the states like the European Union would be preferable. Let the red states suffer with their policy while not holding back the rest of us. There is no hope but to split up, there are way too many people who are willingly and proudly ignore facts, reason and any grasp of reality. They can all go make their own country for all I care.', ">>{Magic_butt} : I wholeheartedly agree. Just don't let them have the nukes. They think Nuclear war is like a video game. Ironically these people are so unstable and stupid to their very core that they're the very type of person who should not be allowed to own a firearm. Maybe that's why they're so terrified people will take their guns, despite nobody ever advocating to do that. Or maybe they know if we passed laws to prevent the mentally unstable from having guns, they would be on that list.", '>>{MistakeNot___} : > Try not to engage with stupid, they don\'t understand the simplest of concepts. That\'s the opposite of what needs to be done. Ignoring them and letting them live in their "reality bubble" will not fix anything. Unless you plan on waiting till they just die out. They need to be taught by friends. Gently and constantly. Destroy the republican party one stupid voter at a time.', ">>{Magic_butt} : Did you read the rest of my comment? These people can't be reasoned with. I tried. It's not possible. They're too far gone.", '>>{MistakeNot___} : Yes I did. My experience is different. Not with Trump voters in America but with Nazis in Germany. If they cant be reasoned with then you need a different approach. What else do you propose? If everyone stays in their own bubble nothing changes.', ">>{Magic_butt} : You were alive during nazi germany? I've talked to them through reddit, through facebook, in real life. They don't want to hear the truth they just want everyone to drown in their delusions with them. They'll never admit they were wrong until it's way too late. What do I suggest? Fucking never give up pointing out this corrupt republican garbage. People have to open their own eyes and see it. Don't argue with them because they'll outstupid anyone who tries. Just keep posting and talking about the blatant corruption. The number of trump addicts is a minority in america. Win everyone else over, the hardcore KKK fuckers aren't worth our time. They will never change.", '>>{MistakeNot___} : We sadly still have Nazis in Germany and they are a political power to be reckoned with, especially in upcoming elections with all the terrorist scaremongering going on right now. The only thing that keeps the AFD party weak are their internal struggles and the constant right shift of the conservative party. But still, my question remains: what do you propose? How to fix this if not through education?', ">>{Magic_butt} : Yeah, i agree with you. White supremacy is a growing problem everywhere now. I already told you what I suggest. I really don't think you're reading my entire comments.", ">>{MistakeNot___} : > Fucking never give up pointing out this corrupt republican garbage. Yes, but to whom? We both agree about that and so do most people who we are complaining about. I've followed the election closely. And talked with many people who are frustrated and even depressed about the Trump win. But everyone agrees, everyone is as frustrated as me. I've only talked only to one person who is pro-Trump, because I could not find anyone else. So my complaining and pointing out all the problems the presidency will cause does not change anything. We tend to surround ourself with people who agree with us on most bigger issues. And so we create those bubbles. Everything inside that bubble fits together but they are utterly incompatible.", '>>{Magic_butt} : All I can say is to keep supporting newspapers which publish the truth, and keep posting articles on corruption and why racism is bad on sites like reddit that can reach a large audience. You can\'t force these people to see the truth, they have to come to that conclusion on their own. Instead of coming to the truth, they brand liberals as too smug and use "smart" and "college educated" as new insults. How do you argue with someone that far gone? There\'s no solution. It\'s a problem, but racism has always been a problem. I think the world in general is more progressive than it\'s probably ever been. White supremicists are loud and claim they\'re persecuted because they know most people see racism as bad now. The only thing we can do is teach our children not to reward racist behavior and to be kind to others. If we can make it that far into the future without everyone nuking each other, white supremecy will die out naturally. People will learn eventually there\'s no real reason to be racist and racist behavior has negative reprecussions.', ">>{cd411} : If it wasn't for Michigan, Wisconsin, PA or Florida Clinton would have won the electoral college... If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle...so? Out of 58 presidents [Trump was number 46 in electoral college votes...near the bottom!](http://i.imgur.com/dlsLoVU.jpg) He's also at the bottom of popular votes. He's number 47 in the last 48 election. soooooooo bad! But thanks to the FOX/Limbaugh/GOP 24 hour bullshit machine Trump supporters would have no way of knowing that.", '>>{wolfshield929} : Maybe CA should just accept it and move on.', ">>{HabeusCuppus} : CA is already approximately the size and economic power of France. It's not clear that they'd need to join with *anybody* if they went independent.", ">>{MescalPascal} : That's what Putin wants. We'd be playing right into his hands.", '>>{redditortoo} : Which ones? All of them? All of them.', '>>{TheScribbler01} : Yes that\'s exactly what this article is talking about. Republicans have been saying "If you don\'t count California, Trump won the popular vote" as if removing an arbitrary chunk of Americans has any validity.', '>>{ihavesensitiveknees} : A portion of them are just assholes. There is a large crossover of idiots and assholes.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{MultiKdizzle} : California was so anti-Trump that some Republicans don’t want to include it on the 2016 map', '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : Isn\'t it the classic definition of "circlejerk" to uselessly speculate how impossible scenarios might have changed real events?', ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : The article is talking about the popular vote. It's not questioning the winner.", ">>{ItsTime4567} : Californians don't want to be on the map, either. A group of them are pushing to secede.", ">>{CaulkusAurelis} : It's speculating aimlessly, about what WOULD'VE happened, if we excluded this group, that state or the other.... Idle fantasy, imagining a reality that didn't/isn't going to happen, in a public forum. Circlejerking, as Reddit likes to call it.", ">>{mspaintshoops} : >In a world of useless election stats, there has been one floating around for the past few weeks that can make a legitimate claim to be the most useless of all. It got fresh pickup over the weekend thanks to Investor's Business Daily, Townhall.com and former congressman Joe Walsh (R-Ill.). Oddly enough, the article is actually in agreement with you about this very issue. Maybe read it?", ">>{toadofsteel} : Some Republicans don't want to include New York on the map either for the same reason. When questioned as to whether they preferred that the First Family reside primarily in what would become a foreign nation, GOP leaders offered no comment.", ">>{Aemon12} : It's the very first paragraph in the article linked to in this post. You're just commenting after reading a headline, and nothing more, to spew self-righteous outrage.", ">>{mspaintshoops} : It's the first sentence of the article you're commenting on.", '>>{PM_ME_UR_SHOES_GIRL} : California has too many transplants to actually end up seceding unless Trump really does something insaner than his normal insane like repeal the 13th amendment.', '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : Hardly. I READ the parts about excluding the South, and imagining Texas voted a different way than they did. I\'m sorry to burst your ...(what was the term...? "self-righteous?) bubble, but I DID read the article. I suppose I didnt\' recognize the clip you used, and focused more on the parts that seemed to make sense, I.E.: the parts where the author seems to ask WHY would we speculate about a reality that does not exist? I\'ll ask YOU: Why would anyone waste time contemplating a U.S. where California didn\'t vote, or Texas voted a different way?', '>>{Hoppean_Snake_Memes} : They should do so. My guess is within 6 months they turn into Mexico.', '>>{beermile} : Hollywood and Silicon Valley will just pack up and move to Mississippi Edit: guess my /s was not evident', ">>{kogashuko} : Somebody has to pay for all those welfare queen red states. They can't support themselves due to the fact that their economic policies are all bullshit meant to steal as much money and resources as possible for large corporations.", '>>{DayMan4224} : I doubt California would be the only one if that was the case.', '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : > like repeal the 13th amendment. I would like to introduce you to the [Secretary of Hard Labor.](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/08/us/politics/andrew-puzder-labor-secretary-trump.html)', ">>{beermile} : I don't know, but I've usually seen it presented as an argument against those who point out that Trump was significantly behind in the popular vote count. Besides, people like to speculate on shit. What's wrong with that? Take for example, *Old Custer* by Eli Cash. Well, everyone knows Custer died at Little Bighorn. What this book presupposes is... maybe he didn't?", ">>{beermile} : More likely they'd stay right where they are and join with Canada. California has a higher population and stronger economy than the entire country of Canada, after all. None of those people want to move to Mississippi. Fuck that humidity.", '>>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : > Fuck that humidity. Damn right. SE Humidity is hell.', '>>{flip314} : McMullin made it look like Utah moved from being the reddest state to halfway towards turning blue. Hahaha.', '>>{resultachieved} : Gonna be hard to have a successful US economy without CA.', ">>{pro_skub_neutrality} : Don't forget all the technology and entertainment CA produces.", '>>{bigplrbear} : I got downvoted to hell and back in this sub for predicting that this is exactly how Republicans will justify trump "winning the popular vote".', '>>{xevba} : All the blue states should boycott federal taxes. But none of them has the balls too. Oh how I wish CA and NY teamed up on this. Fuck them all.', ">>{jeanroyall} : Right??? Those red States want to see what it's like without a federal government? Ok, turn off the money pipeline, let's see how they like that.", ">>{jeanroyall} : Dude you got caught, just accept it and move on. The fur quoted the first line of the article at you, agreed with you, and proved you hadn't even bothered to read the article... Go home", ">>{Magic_butt} : Cascadia looking sexier by the day. Republicans couldn't be classy to save their lives. Vindictive children... actually, children have better behavior and a general care for other humans, so that's an insult to children. They got their Pussy-grabber racist in chief yet they're butthurt in droves that everyone isn't bowing down and sucking their dicks. So they want to write off the most populous states in america and tell them they aren't really american. So unamerican and brainless. Its the USA not United states of republican party... or united states of russia, but thank them for admitting where their real alleigances are. They would toss aside american states for Russia. Traitors.", ">>{jeanroyall} : That's the entire point of the article... Speculating on what would have happened if California didn't exist is as pointless as speculating if the entire deep South didn't exist or flipping Texas' electoral votes. Try reading it.", '>>{Magic_butt} : At this point, anyone who defends "Too Smart For Intelligence Breifings" Trump is allowing themselves to be brainwashed. Try not to engage with stupid, they don\'t understand the simplest of concepts. They\'ve been in a self-perpetuated state of baseless rage caused by imaginary persecution for so long that it\'s cooked their brains. It\'s so comical to see people jump through mental gymnastics about why they\'re soooo oppressed because being called racist is "identity politics". They\'re so completely unable and unwilling to understand that minorities, gays, and women have endured far worse than that at the hands of white men, yet they\'re the oppressed ones for being called out on unacceptable behavior. I\'m as lily white as it gets and the only people in my entire life who called me racist were trump addicts online assuming I\'m colored just because I speak out in favor of minority rights and call out racist ideas. They think we are all part of a feminist cult because we speak out for basic women\'s rights. Their brains are jumbled and they spend too much time on the internet searching for shit to feel offended over because they need something to bitch about to distract them from their boring lives. It\'s truly pathetic behavior. If clinton had won, I wouldn\'t seek out trump addicts online to shit in their faces. I would have popped a bottle and continued with my life in peace. Why aren\'t they doing that? They have no life, they are unpleasant people who take pleasure in kicking people when they\'re down. They need someone to blame for their shitty lives so they can pretend they have no choices to better themselves and their problems aren\'t caused by their own actions and horrible attitudes. And that\'s the end of my rant.', '>>{Magic_butt} : This comment is so delusional and shows an extreme misunderstanding of californians.', '>>{Magic_butt} : I think the main thing is that there will be reprecussions for refusing to pay federal taxes which are supposed to be used for the good of the country, instead the federal gv\'t gives them to idiot red states who voted in republicans because "MURICA" even though they promised to fuck over the entire state. I\'d be fine with helping out other states if they weren\'t purposefully fucking themselves in the ass then refusing to learn their lesson. I don\'t believe secession will ever happen for blue states, although I would love to see it. Refusing to pay federal taxes would be the first sign of secession, though. If cali and NY start refusing to pay fed taxes, shit\'s gonna go down. It would be cool to see it go that far, especially since Cali has straight up announced defiance in face of the new regime.', '>>{xevba} : Shit needs to go down. I am sick and tired of living in stupid America.', ">>{Magic_butt} : Republicans love russia more than american states. I don't see how wanting our country and planet to burn is american. America is about diversity and accepting immigrants (see statue of liberty) obviously people don't want that anymore, so the american experiment is failing. I'm embarrassed of what our country has become but proud as fuck of california. I fully support secession. No taxation without representation. 3 million votes uncounted? We'll join canada and maybe they'll appreciate our tax dollars rather than forcing religious laws on us and destroying our only planet. I don't think it will ever happen, but I support it.", '>>{xevba} : Breaking up the states like the European Union would be preferable. Let the red states suffer with their policy while not holding back the rest of us. There is no hope but to split up, there are way too many people who are willingly and proudly ignore facts, reason and any grasp of reality. They can all go make their own country for all I care.', ">>{Magic_butt} : I wholeheartedly agree. Just don't let them have the nukes. They think Nuclear war is like a video game. Ironically these people are so unstable and stupid to their very core that they're the very type of person who should not be allowed to own a firearm. Maybe that's why they're so terrified people will take their guns, despite nobody ever advocating to do that. Or maybe they know if we passed laws to prevent the mentally unstable from having guns, they would be on that list.", '>>{MistakeNot___} : > Try not to engage with stupid, they don\'t understand the simplest of concepts. That\'s the opposite of what needs to be done. Ignoring them and letting them live in their "reality bubble" will not fix anything. Unless you plan on waiting till they just die out. They need to be taught by friends. Gently and constantly. Destroy the republican party one stupid voter at a time.', ">>{Magic_butt} : Did you read the rest of my comment? These people can't be reasoned with. I tried. It's not possible. They're too far gone.", '>>{MistakeNot___} : Yes I did. My experience is different. Not with Trump voters in America but with Nazis in Germany. If they cant be reasoned with then you need a different approach. What else do you propose? If everyone stays in their own bubble nothing changes.', ">>{Magic_butt} : You were alive during nazi germany? I've talked to them through reddit, through facebook, in real life. They don't want to hear the truth they just want everyone to drown in their delusions with them. They'll never admit they were wrong until it's way too late. What do I suggest? Fucking never give up pointing out this corrupt republican garbage. People have to open their own eyes and see it. Don't argue with them because they'll outstupid anyone who tries. Just keep posting and talking about the blatant corruption. The number of trump addicts is a minority in america. Win everyone else over, the hardcore KKK fuckers aren't worth our time. They will never change.", '>>{MistakeNot___} : We sadly still have Nazis in Germany and they are a political power to be reckoned with, especially in upcoming elections with all the terrorist scaremongering going on right now. The only thing that keeps the AFD party weak are their internal struggles and the constant right shift of the conservative party. But still, my question remains: what do you propose? How to fix this if not through education?', ">>{Magic_butt} : Yeah, i agree with you. White supremacy is a growing problem everywhere now. I already told you what I suggest. I really don't think you're reading my entire comments.", ">>{MistakeNot___} : > Fucking never give up pointing out this corrupt republican garbage. Yes, but to whom? We both agree about that and so do most people who we are complaining about. I've followed the election closely. And talked with many people who are frustrated and even depressed about the Trump win. But everyone agrees, everyone is as frustrated as me. I've only talked only to one person who is pro-Trump, because I could not find anyone else. So my complaining and pointing out all the problems the presidency will cause does not change anything. We tend to surround ourself with people who agree with us on most bigger issues. And so we create those bubbles. Everything inside that bubble fits together but they are utterly incompatible.", '>>{Magic_butt} : All I can say is to keep supporting newspapers which publish the truth, and keep posting articles on corruption and why racism is bad on sites like reddit that can reach a large audience. You can\'t force these people to see the truth, they have to come to that conclusion on their own. Instead of coming to the truth, they brand liberals as too smug and use "smart" and "college educated" as new insults. How do you argue with someone that far gone? There\'s no solution. It\'s a problem, but racism has always been a problem. I think the world in general is more progressive than it\'s probably ever been. White supremicists are loud and claim they\'re persecuted because they know most people see racism as bad now. The only thing we can do is teach our children not to reward racist behavior and to be kind to others. If we can make it that far into the future without everyone nuking each other, white supremecy will die out naturally. People will learn eventually there\'s no real reason to be racist and racist behavior has negative reprecussions.', ">>{cd411} : If it wasn't for Michigan, Wisconsin, PA or Florida Clinton would have won the electoral college... If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle...so? Out of 58 presidents [Trump was number 46 in electoral college votes...near the bottom!](http://i.imgur.com/dlsLoVU.jpg) He's also at the bottom of popular votes. He's number 47 in the last 48 election. soooooooo bad! But thanks to the FOX/Limbaugh/GOP 24 hour bullshit machine Trump supporters would have no way of knowing that.", '>>{wolfshield929} : Maybe CA should just accept it and move on.', ">>{HabeusCuppus} : CA is already approximately the size and economic power of France. It's not clear that they'd need to join with *anybody* if they went independent.", ">>{MescalPascal} : That's what Putin wants. We'd be playing right into his hands.", '>>{redditortoo} : Which ones? All of them? All of them.', '>>{TheScribbler01} : Yes that\'s exactly what this article is talking about. Republicans have been saying "If you don\'t count California, Trump won the popular vote" as if removing an arbitrary chunk of Americans has any validity.', '>>{ihavesensitiveknees} : A portion of them are just assholes. There is a large crossover of idiots and assholes.'], ['>>{talkr_ios} : Honda "Yearbooks" Super Bowl Ad Explained with iOS app Talkr', '>>{talkr_ios} : Everyone who knows my app talkr (http://talkrapp.com) was asking me how they did the Honda ad, so I figured I would make a video. Here are some "promo codes" for the premium version of the app ($2.99) that let you set up more than 2 faces: * XH3YEY4FLTF3 * HF73JT9P6HRJ * EPTA3JY3LY6R * WMMP6NKXJ3W3 * 6KET7W3XPHWN * PPHEMXM6TW3T Codes expire in 28 days.', '>>{LookAtTheFlowers} : They seem to have used. May I have code, please?', ">>{talkr_ios} : I can provide a few more codes, but I gave 5 codes and only got 3 upvotes! Vote me up, and I'll send out more.", '>>{talkr_ios} : Thanks for the upvotes! Here are 6 more: * EFE447APAHFP * F9EFAKRLAA94 * NNLF44TP9JYY * M7MKJHEJ7XFT * 3M4FR4RY997Y * K6MJFJLTLWKT', '>>{examinati0n} : Thanks for the codes, managed to claim the M7MKJ one.', ">>{talkr_ios} : Thanks for checking out the app and letting everyone know which code you got! For anyone that didn't get a code, I have a few more for folks that download the app (it's free) and leave an honest review on the app store. Have fun making your pictures talk!", '>>{justanormalguy01} : Lol are you serious? "Vote me up," naw fam.', '>>{talkr_ios} : Naw fam indeed. Spent all my time writing this app, and now realizing all the work that goes into getting it noticed. Thankful for the up-votes and visibility from the r/iphone folks though!', ">>{evillordsoth} : I already own it, so don't need the code. Great app though, doing a helluva job!"]]

classify and reply

[">>{SATexas1} : Y'all aren't that stupid right? I mean you know bs when you hear it. It isn't a thing unless you fall for it", '>>{BadDecisionDino} : At first I thought "Okay, I guess we\'re getting news from Teen Vogue now." Then I remembered that our president is an admitted serial sexual assaulter who has normalized pussy-grabbing and bullying teenage girls on twitter. A guy who\'s built a cult following among teenage boys who love being part of le edgy meme brigade. So there\'s now a very good chance that your teen daughter will be going to school with guys who idolize a man that brags about bursting in on 15 year olds in changing rooms, and gets a chub when he runs into 10 year olds in public, fantasizing about how he\'ll be dating them in a few years. So...you know...maybe it\'s not crazy that Teen Vogue should teach their readers what abuse looks like?', '>>{TowneshipRebellion} : Who is "y\'all"? You mean the general redditor?', ">>{SaltHash} : >Y'all aren't that stupid right? I mean you know bs when you hear it. >It isn't a thing unless you fall for it Coincidentally, those comments also aptly applies to the folks who voted for a Tweeter in a trucker hat because he promised obvious B.S. about a wall.", '>>{FALGSC_IN_MY_ASSROID} : Trump 2016: Gas-lighting America Trump 2020: Gas-chambering America', '>>{dolphins3} : >who brags about bursting in on 15 year olds in changing rooms, It still baffles me that this wasn\'t a bigger thing. He literally admitted that he would deliberately walk in on naked minors, and that was somehow not a big deal for the "family values" crowd? I mean, I know that the Christian Right doesn\'t actually give a shit about families and their spiel is just a cover for the fact that they really fucking hate biology, LGBT people, women who have sex, and atheists, but they usually bother trying to hide it a little more.', ">>{colormefeminist} : Intel committee representative Adam Schiff [gaslighted Tucker Carlson](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRcP9DYjAQ&t=7m) by saying he is an apologist for the Kremlin because Carlson wanted Schiff to admit that Russia hacked Podesta's emails. Schiff refused to say this and got personal with Carlson, trying to make him question his integrity. Good thing Carlson saw right through it. Is this acceptable to everyone else?", ">>{987f} : It's insane that you guys profess the perill of fake news, then you elevate *Teen Vogue* because they agree with your preconceived notions of how the world works. It's insane! What happened to you, reddit?", ">>{MissionStyle} : Their team won. America lost... But they don't care. Sad thing is, they won't care no matter what is done. It's a scary time we live in.", ">>{disinterstedparty} : Maybe he meant, has Trump ever stopped raping his wives' sons?", ">>{so--what} : Pretty simple. Fake news means fabricated stories, lies with intent. Not bias or collusion or editorializing or errors. There is nothing fabricated in this article even if you disagree with the point it's making.", '>>{Lokismoke} : Anyone else remember the Vice-President debate. "He never said that"', '>>{rznfcc} : Trump won the Presidency by gas light. His rise to power has awakened a force of bigotry by ... normalizing deception. Hillary perfected "normalizing deception". Be it Bengazi, her foundation, or her attempt to circumvent federal law by maintaining an unsecured server in her home and lying repeatedly about it, she is the queen of normalizing deception. Not to even mention her subversion of votes for those favoring Bernie. The American people saw through her deception and gave her the boot. Here\'s to hoping we never have to see her face in the midst of any public policy debate again.', '>>{987f} : >The CIA officially determined that Russia intervened in our election False. Find me one official direct source of this information from the CIA itself. No media filter. >It wasn\'t one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. False. This is an example of purposeful misinterpretation of language to support a perspective. >the President-elect\'s attempt to undermine the American people\'s access to that information Sort of like pushing blame of an email leak to "Russian spies" like it\'s the Cold War era... >Trump won the Presidency by gas light False. He won by actually campaigning on the things Americans actually care about. Race issues are over. Gender issues are over. Sexuality issues are over. Identity politics are over. We\'re all equal. >His rise to power has awakened a force of bigotry by condoning and encouraging hatred, but also by normalizing deception. False. Clinton supporters are those who reject other\'s point of view which is the definition of bigotry. >Civil rights are now on trial, though before we can fight to reassert the march toward equality, we must regain control of the truth. False. Trump has never said anything against American\'s rights. He\'s the first President elect to support gay marriage. He has appointed more women to his cabinet than any other president elect. I could keep going. Surprisingly, TeenVogue is not a good source of information.', ">>{WinkleCream} : The question is how do we win at least part of Trump's coalition back to the non-fascist side of American politics?", '>>{JacobCrim88} : This was someones argument to me about that: > Well it was his pageant, so technically he owned those girls for the time being. *smdh*', '>>{so--what} : >Find me one official direct source of this information from the CIA itself. No media filter. So the only way you will believe this story is if a CIA official breaks the law to talk to you in person ("no media filter") about state secrets pertaining to an ongoing investigation concerning cyberwarfare between superpowers? Is this your standard of evidence?', '>>{2legit2fart} : Because this election was about deporting "illegal", rapist Mexicans, and banning Muslims. His supporters did not care about equality, of any kind.', '>>{987f} : My standard of evidence is proof. Saying "I heard this from somebody" is not proof. It would not hold up in court or in a scientific laboratory. When I say proof, I mean actual proof. Do you realize how insane it is that you have *zero* standard for proof?', ">>{Blacksheep2134} : > Clinton supporters are those who reject other's point of view which is the definition of bigotry. As we all know, opposing bigotry is the real bigotry. Check your privilege people who think lesbians exist!", '>>{Blacksheep2134} : Your argument was essentially, "nuh uh, you!", it wasn\'t deserving of anything more.', '>>{smith-smythesmith} : A significant chunk of them were simply anti-Hillary-at-all-costs. Remove her from the equation and you have one less roadblock, irrational though it may have been.', ">>{so--what} : There is no proof of the existence of external world, by the way. You believe in it nonetheless, because fortunately, perfect proof isn't a reasonable standard of evidence for anything, much less the complicated and confusing world of human affairs : >it is the mark of an educated mind to look for precision in each class of things just so far as the nature of the subject admits; it is evidently equally foolish to accept probable reasoning from a mathematician and to demand from a rhetorician scientific proof (Aristotle, *Nichomachean Ethics*, I,3) It's also very hypocritical, considering most of what you said before has never met the standard of evidence you require from the CIA story. Your weak rhetorical trick is transparent : it is meant to preemptively move the goalposts indefinitely. You think you are casting reasonable suspicion regarding this story, but the only thing you're doing is showing just how far you're ready to apply double standards to bury your head in the sand.", ">>{musterkeaton} : We're just trying to keep the ones we have, thanks.", '>>{WinkleCream} : It is not irrational to not want to vote for a corporatist centrist pretending to be a progressive.', ">>{987f} : A scientist or courtroom would accept proof of the external world. What the fuck are you talking about? Nihilism is totally irrelevant. I just want hard proof, rather than hear-say from anonymous sources. That is a wholly reasonable request. I have an anonymous source at the CIA says Russia wasn't behind the hack. Boom. You have to believe that because I have an anonymous source! Nothing I said fails the test of legal or scientific proof. The goal post is scientific or legal proof. Not moving at all. I demand actual, hard evidence. All of us living in the real world, use hard evidence to determine what the real world is like.", '>>{ghotier} : It is if the other side is worse, yes.', '>>{WinkleCream} : If you vote out of fear I pity you.', '>>{smith-smythesmith} : It is if you live in a swing state and the alternative is a sentient orange scrotum.', ">>{thudstroke} : > It wasn't one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. > False. This is an example of purposeful misinterpretation of language to support a perspective. How the fuck do you interpret numbers then? Trump's victory was the 12th smallest margin of victory out of our 57 elections. 45 elections ended with a larger margin of victory. 45/57=.79. 79% of elections had a larger margin of victory. If you were in the 21st percentile of intelligence (which you might be) would you say you were one of the smartest people? If you came last place in a 5 person race would you say you were one of the fastest people? Jesus fucking Christ. Use some fucking common sense for once.", ">>{WinkleCream} : Corporatist centrists don't win against populist authoritarians, did you learn that lesson?", '>>{987f} : It was a victory. It was an electoral college victory. It was a big victory because it was unexpected. Name an election where the mainstream media called it more wrong. Therefore it was one of the biggest electoral victories.', '>>{so--what} : Oh, this is embarassing... you don\'t know what an anonymous source is in journalism. It\'s not like a phone tip to the cops. They are only anonymous *to the public*, for their safety. The reporters, editors and lawyers of the newspaper all know who the sources are and can vouch for them. So when an accredited news source says "CIA officials say X", it means at least two actual CIA officials confirmed it on the record. I\'m sorry your education system failed to teach you media literacy. At any rate, the claim that Russia hacked the US can\'t be tested in a lab and never will be brought to court. So again, the charge that you set up impossible epistemic standards for the matter at hand still holds. Nevermind that this is being extremely dishonest. Indeed, most of the stuff we reasonably believe in our day to day life (and about political matters) could never even theoretically meet these standards of evidence.', '>>{rollerhen} : They can clean up america now that they have control of the three branches of government and the educational system. The 7 mountains they are trying to control are: * Media (Bannon, Ailes, Trump) * Government (Gop controlled almost 100%) * Religion (Judeo-Christian - aka Fundamentalist Christian ) * Arts & entertainment (video games alt-right, Star Wars boycotts, Trump, etc) * Education (Betsy DeVos, defund public school system, creationism, enrich bible schools) * Business (Mercer, DeVos, prosperity gospel) * Family (This is where religion belongs, IMO) https://www.generals.org/rpn/the-seven-mountains/ The Seven Mountains of Societal Influence In 1975, Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade and Loren Cunningham, founder of Youth With a Mission(YWAM), developed a God-given, world-changing strategy. Their mandate: Bring Godly change to a nation by reaching its seven spheres, or mountains, of societal influence. They concluded that in order to truly transform any nation with the Gospel of Jesus Christ, these seven facets of society must be reached: Religion, Family,Education, Government, Media, Arts & Entertainment and Business. The Reformation Prayer Network’s primary goal is to be a catalyst, through prayer and righteous activism, which will bring change to these areas of societal influence. 1. RELIGION Every society has some type of belief in a superior being or beings. In the east, religions tend to be polytheistic (many gods) or outright idolatrous (such as Hinduism and Buddhism). Although these religions are thousands of years old, they nonetheless continue to thrive today. In the west, Christianity and Catholicism are predominant, but postmodern views are increasingly being accepted and the concept of God is being rejected. This is especially true in Europe. The Christian Church is described in the Greek language as the ecclesia. Literally translated, the word ecclesia means “governing body.” Although we don’t condone theocracies, this translation suggests that the Church should have great influence in all other spheres that make up a society. With a plethora of categorized religions around the world, it’s the Church’s responsibility to reach the lost with the love and Gospel of Jesus Christ, and expand the Kingdom in ministerial efforts, both nationally and internationally. 2. FAMILY In any functional society, the family is the “building block” of the community. Throughout the Bible, you will find familial examples that portray how we ought to live our lives today. God desires that men, women, and children within a family be united as one in His love. After all, He is the ultimate Father (Romans 8:14-17). The families of the United States have been under constant and prolonged attack. Today, the assailants are fatherlessness, divorce (50% rate in secular and Christian marriages), abuse, homosexual marriage, pornography, and other negative influences have brought great dysfunction to American life. God is calling fathers and mothers (both spiritual and biological) to bring order to the chaos that the enemy has unleashed against families in America. He also wants to bring healing to marriages and relationships within families in order to maintain a moral foundation for children in the future to stand upon. 3. EDUCATION At one time the education system of America unapologetically incorporated the Bible, prayer to the God of the Bible, and biblical values in every aspect of school life. Not coincidentally, this system produced a people that produced the most powerful and prosperous nation the earth has ever seen. Now, the children of our nation are inundated with liberal ideologies, atheistic teaching and postmodern principles in our public schools and in most universities (including many Christian institutions). Put simply; they are being indoctrinated with often false, biased and anti-biblical information. A re-introduction of biblical truth and Bible-centric values is the key to renewal and restoration in America’s failing educational system. 4. GOVERNMENT Proverbs 14:34 states that, “righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.” Many times, as exemplified in the Old Testament, a nation’s moral standards are dependent on those exhibited by its leaders (or predominant political party). While each individual is responsible for his or her own sins; the fact remains that people are greatly influenced by those moral (or lack thereof) that popular leaders adopt. The progressive liberal agenda, empowered by well-known men and women in the arts and entertainment industries, have made significant gains in the political arena over the past few decades. In fact, many liberal groups, such as the ACLU, seek to remove anything related to God or Christianity from the governmental and educational systems because of a misapplied interpretation of the phrase, “separation of church and state.” We must see a shift in this arena in order to preserve the Christian heritage that America was founded upon. The goal is to put in place righteous political leaders that will positively affect all aspects of government. 5. MEDIA The media mountain includes news sources such as radio, TV news stations, newspapers, Internet news and opinion (blog) sites and etc. The media has the potential to sway popular opinion on current issues based upon its reporting, which is not always truthful or accurate. In the 2008 elections, the liberal “elite” media played a vital role, especially in the Presidential race. Their generally supportive and positive reporting greatly influenced the outcome. There has been a rise in Christian news services, which is needed. However, to bring transformation to the mountain of media, Christians who are gifted for and called into this type of work must be willing to report righteously and truthfully in the secular marketplace. 6. ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT In this mountain we find some of the most influential forces shaping our society. Music, filmmaking, television, social media, and the performing arts drive the cultural tastes, values and standards of a nation’s citizens, particularly its youth. With a heavy reliance on the strong appeal of sex, drugs and alcohol, the arts and entertainment industries wield significant influence. The body of Christ needs powerful, righteous men and women who are not afraid to take their God-given talent into the arts and entertainment arenas. People ready to further His purposes, while impacting those who are lost in darkness and would not otherwise be interested in any kind of Christian message in traditional forms. 7. BUSINESS The ability to literally create wealth through ingenuity, enterprise, creativity and effort and is a God-given gift and a universal impulse. The markets and economic systems that emerge whenever people are free to pursue buying and selling become the lifeblood of a nation. This includes anything from farms to small businesses to large corporations. Of course this realm is prone to corruption through idolatry, greed and covetousness. In response, the Church must embrace its responsibility to train up those who are called into the marketplace to manage businesses and provide leadership with integrity and honesty. We believe it is the Lord’s will to make his people prosperous and that He desires for His Church to use its wealth to finance the work of Kingdom expansion. Simply put: Prosperity with a purpose. Edit: typo, clarification', '>>{so--what} : >The Mets won 1-0. It was a baseball victory. It was a big victory because it was unexpected. The sports analysts had it all wrong. >Therefore, it was one of the biggest victories in baseball. Pretty sure that in context, "big electoral college victory" means "election won by a big margin of electoral votes." It\'s not one of the biggest margins.', '>>{987f} : When the Cubs won the world series it was one of the biggest victories in baseball history because nobody expected it. Your logic is incorrect.', '>>{CollumMcJingleballs} : Teen Vogue is the real shit we need now.', '>>{thudstroke} : Now who\'s misrepresenting language to support a perspective? If that\'s what you were trying to say there are other ways to say it. "Upset", "historic", "unpredictable". All those words describe better what you were trying to describe using "biggest". But I know what you\'re doing. The russian propoganda "firehose of falshood". Just spew complete nonsense so people lose all sense of what\'s right and wrong. That way we can\'t have a rational discussion about issues because we are in two different realities.', '>>{so--what} : Good thing that wasn\'t my example. Also a good thing : I explained what a "big electoral college victory" means. Your reading skills are poor.', '>>{ghotier} : Okay. I pity me because not enough people voted out of fear and now we should all be afraid.', ">>{WinkleCream} : If enough people had voted out of hope for a real progressive like Sanders we wouldn't be in this mess.", '>>{987f} : Smug pretentious leftist. You\'re a stereotype. The media precludes their use anonymous source privileges when they are **actively doxxing the source of an anonymous leak.** Assange said it was *not* the Russian government. He knows who it was. That can be proved. He has hard evidence that can be tested. So you were wrong. The reason you say this: >most of the stuff we reasonably believe in our day to day life (and about political matters) could never even theoretically meet these standards of evidence. And include "we" is because you want to deny responsibility, and would rather remain in your gaslighted bubble.', ">>{987f} : You don't get to define what things mean. You are not an authority.", ">>{spotted_dick} : They will care when they are living on cabbage soup for sustenance, and dying 'cos they can't get health care. Or maybe they'll still blame the democrats.", ">>{so--what} : >Assange said it was *not* the Russian government. He knows who it was. That can be proved. He has hard evidence that can be tested. So you were wrong. Well, that it *can* be proved is irrelevent until it has. Why do you believe Assange? He doesn't follow your own standards : he hasn't brought his evidence in a lab or in a courtroom -- where, incidentally, he is still awaited for his rape case.", ">>{so--what} : I haven't defined anything. I just stated what is obvious to competent language users.", ">>{staringinto_space} : > It wasn't one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. >> False. This is an example of purposeful misinterpretation of language to support a perspective. So, just to make sure, you are arguing that this is the biggest EC victory in history? If that's what you are arguing you are woefully ignorant of the facts. Your other points are also lame", ">>{bulgarianwoebegone} : >My standard for evidence is proof. >False. He won by actually campaigning on the things Americans actually care about. **Race issues are over. Gender issues are over. Sexuality issues are over. Identity politics are over. We're all equal.** Please provide proof for these claims.", ">>{Gasonfires} : I was surprised that this is really pretty solid stuff, especially the linked [primer on how to avoid getting suckered by fake news](https://docs.google.com/document/d/10eA5-mCZLSS4MQY5QGb5ewC3VAL6pLkT53V_81ZyitM/preview). And I don't think there is any better advice in the entire article proper than this: >Refuse to accept information simply because it is fed to you, and don't be afraid to ask questions.", '>>{magataga} : Teen Vogue is a better source of news on the president elect than the New York freaking Times. We live in the age of the Apocalypse. Surely this must be a sign of the end times.', ">>{ghotier} : I did vote for Sanders. But enough people thought that a person who is basically the status quo for a career politician was as bad as a science denying authoritarian internet troll that we got the least qualified, scariest President elect in history. So go ahead and condescend and pity me, but I hope you're also putting energy into fixing the problem and not just castigating people on the Internet.", '>>{theamazingjex} : Dont worry, the New York Times will find the smoking gun in those Clinton emails aaaaaaaanyday now. God knows they cant admit they made a mistake.', ">>{theamazingjex} : I'm sure that he will realize he made a mistake and apologize.", '>>{gu4po} : > gaslighting (Buzzword of the Year) > teenvogue.com > 86% upvoted https://i.imgur.com/pWcGkFs.gif', ">>{johnnynutman} : I didn't even know there were 15 year olds, only adults.", ">>{underwaterpizza} : Certainly not equal yet. Facts gathered by independent groups contradict this point at every turn. Incarceration rates, dropout rates, pay-gap, refusal of service to lgbt people, the list goes on and on. How about you do some actual research before you make dumb claims to support your dumbass president-elect. Oh, yeah, and we will see about this Russia thing. Still doesn't excuse him for questioning the legitimacy of the CIA. He is skipping briefings and calling their intelligence into question. It may not be perfect, but it is the best we have.", '>>{underwaterpizza} : What? People expected it. The only thing in the way was a fake curse...', '>>{underwaterpizza} : He can\'t, because he is projecting. "I can\'t substantiate my claims so I will just say that you can\'t either" Too bad for him we can.', ">>{underwaterpizza} : Let's have some proof! Oh wait, you can only provide RT, Breitbart, and you crazy uncle. She's a corporatist shill, but people have still yet to prove anything other than her incompetence in setting up an email server", ">>{chowderbags} : They're blame Jews, Atheists, Blacks, Muslims, gays, etc, and that's just to start. Then they'll start blaming the people who aren't the right *kind* of Christian, probably Catholics, Quakers, and liberal Protestants. The one thing a fundamentalist hates more than the heathen is the heretic.", '>>{chowderbags} : Soon Tiger Beat will be writing articles on Trump\'s cabinet picks and Cosmogirl will have an article entitled "15 Ways To Know If Your President Or Boyfriend Are A Russian Puppet (And What To Do About It!)".', ">>{workerbotsuperhero} : > She's a corporatist shill, but people have still yet to prove anything other than her incompetence in setting up an email server Meanwhile, just recently the president-elect has been involved in: * that [$25M federal fraud lawsuit settlement](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/source-trump-nearing-settlement-in-trump-university-fraud-cases/2016/11/18/8dc047c0-ada0-11e6-a31b-4b6397e625d0_story.html?utm_term=.78834f0094a5) * the insane [Russian hacking/election tampering scandal](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-orders-review-of-russian-hacking-during-presidential-campaign/2016/12/09/31d6b300-be2a-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html?utm_term=.c63eb46009b7) And his new appointments include: * the surgeon who - incredibly - [doesn't believe in darwinian evolution](http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/ben-carson-argued-evolution-was-encouraged-satan) * the former Breitbart CEO who made money [denigrating jews, immigrants, and women](http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/08/17/breitbart-news-worst-headlines/212467) * a would-be attorney general [dogged by decades of accusations of racism](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/18/that-time-the-senate-denied-jeff-sessions-a-federal-judgeship-over-accusations-of-racism/?utm_term=.dbded77cdf9a) * an EPA chief who [denies scientific knowledge and consensus,](http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/07/politics/trump-picks-scott-pruitt-to-head-epa/) preferring disinformation promoted by the industries he is charged with regulating * an FDA commissioner who thinks [the FDA should stop testing drugs for safety and efficacy](https://www.statnews.com/2016/12/07/trump-fda-oneill/) before they are sold to the public But let's talk more about that email server, and how bad it was, and how that's the biggest problem here for America.", ">>{iamjacksprofile} : Teen Vogue? Is that what we've become? This place has become an embarrassment. There's plenty of I hate Trump articles that arent written by Teen Vogue that can be posted.", '>>{Downbound92} : > a man that brags about bursting in on 15 year olds in changing rooms, and gets a chub when he runs into 10 year olds in public, [But, Hillary is the one organizing a child sex ring.](https://media.giphy.com/media/Fml0fgAxVx1eM/giphy.gif)', ">>{mainliningfbs} : Let's not forget about the 13 year old he raped who recanted her statements.", '>>{WinkleCream} : Obama won on hope and change. Clinton lost on the status quo, just like Gore did. I hope you Democrats learn your lesson, it is embarrassing how many presidential elections you have lost in 30 years.', ">>{warblox} : They won't care even after they starve to death. The Silver lining of them starving to death is that their opinion won't matter if they're dead.", ">>{warblox} : > Religion (Judio-Christian) Religion is strictly Christian. The alt-right hates Jews and can't wait to genocide them.", '>>{warblox} : My go-to for now is WaPo. They ran an editorial today titled "Trump is actually a fascist."', ">>{warblox} : Don't forget making the CEO of ExxonMobil Secretary of State.", '>>{underwaterpizza} : Gonna steal this and share it with people, keep up the good work', ">>{donkeybaster} : Most Americans don't want socialist Sanders, tough shit.", '>>{WinkleCream} : Clinton primary voters are the sole reason Trump won.', ">>{donkeybaster} : Lol, that socialist dork Sanders had no chance. She beat him by more votes than what she leads the popular vote over Trump with. The majority of Americans wouldn't vote for a weak ass socialist and nobody believes they would but his cult. He was a sore loser and tried to take the country down with him.", ">>{WinkleCream} : Ah, name calling. How mature. Clinton lost because her supporters were toxic and vicious at everyone who wasn't *with her*. So Americans voted for Trump to spite those hateful Clinton supporters. Think back of all the names you have called Trump and Sanders supporters this election. Now, next time you look in the mirror, realize you elected Donald Trump, no one else, you.", ">>{donkeybaster} : >. Clinton lost because her supporters were toxic and vicious at everyone who wasn't with her. Are you Donald Trump? Cause you are projecting like him. The only ones using that phrase were Bernie Bros, who are the most insufferable toddlers on the Internet. >Now, next time you look in the mirror, realize you elected Donald Trump, no one else, you. Again with the projecting. Get out of your bubble and talk to a person sometime. Bernie Sanders had NO chance. He did dupe a lot of people on reddit into thinking he did . He is a dangerous idiot.", '>>{donkeybaster} : If the name fits, which it does. Bernie Sanders is the best thing that happened to the GOP.', ">>{workerbotsuperhero} : > making the CEO of ExxonMobil Secretary of State. Honestly, I'm wondering how much time we have before the oil company executives who are now our leaders are calling for an another invasion of an oil producing country. What should we do when that starts happening again?", '>>{rollerhen} : Typo - should have written Judeo-Christian and that is a reference to Fundamentalist Christian.', ">>{ghotier} : Good deflection. I hope you don't enjoy having rights, because you're about to have fewer of them. It sounds to me like you just didn't vote and now you're looking to blame everyone else for this. I'm not in a swing state, I looked at third party candidates, and they were all crazy. So I voted for not crazy, but sure, be proud of yourself for not voting for the one not crazy candidate.", '>>{WinkleCream} : Stop assuming you know anything about me stranger, thanks.', ">>{Dravvie} : I'm kind of glad that they're teaching teenage girls that this isn't sane healthy or normal even if this will be the status quo from the president for the next few years politically.", '>>{Huck77} : The right has become very good at manufacturing hate for up and comers on the left. Look at how long they have been working on taking down Hillary.', '>>{MostlyDrunkalready} : His "argument" consisted of almost every logical fallacy. I would say it deserved ridicule more than sarcasm.', '>>{sickweekafter} : cool. gaslighting now doesnt mean anything. Or would Hillary lying on the campaign trail be gaslighting?', ">>{mirh} : > other than her incompetence in setting up an email server Which let's remember, was probably [more secure](http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/state-department-slaps-top-secret-on-22-e-mails-found-on-clintons-server/) in hindsight than DOD ones.", '>>{mirh} : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sarah-palin-crony-capitalism-carrier_us_58420349e4b017f37fe4c443 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/just-when-you-thought-the-trump-ethics-disaster-couldnt-get-worse-it-did/2017/01/16/001db550-dc04-11e6-ad42-f3375f271c9c_story.html http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/01/trump-team-reportedly-wants-to-strip-fcc-of-consumer-protection-powers/ Is there a sub/list for all this shit?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{SATexas1} : Y'all aren't that stupid right? I mean you know bs when you hear it. It isn't a thing unless you fall for it", '>>{BadDecisionDino} : At first I thought "Okay, I guess we\'re getting news from Teen Vogue now." Then I remembered that our president is an admitted serial sexual assaulter who has normalized pussy-grabbing and bullying teenage girls on twitter. A guy who\'s built a cult following among teenage boys who love being part of le edgy meme brigade. So there\'s now a very good chance that your teen daughter will be going to school with guys who idolize a man that brags about bursting in on 15 year olds in changing rooms, and gets a chub when he runs into 10 year olds in public, fantasizing about how he\'ll be dating them in a few years. So...you know...maybe it\'s not crazy that Teen Vogue should teach their readers what abuse looks like?', '>>{TowneshipRebellion} : Who is "y\'all"? You mean the general redditor?', ">>{SaltHash} : >Y'all aren't that stupid right? I mean you know bs when you hear it. >It isn't a thing unless you fall for it Coincidentally, those comments also aptly applies to the folks who voted for a Tweeter in a trucker hat because he promised obvious B.S. about a wall.", '>>{FALGSC_IN_MY_ASSROID} : Trump 2016: Gas-lighting America Trump 2020: Gas-chambering America', '>>{dolphins3} : >who brags about bursting in on 15 year olds in changing rooms, It still baffles me that this wasn\'t a bigger thing. He literally admitted that he would deliberately walk in on naked minors, and that was somehow not a big deal for the "family values" crowd? I mean, I know that the Christian Right doesn\'t actually give a shit about families and their spiel is just a cover for the fact that they really fucking hate biology, LGBT people, women who have sex, and atheists, but they usually bother trying to hide it a little more.', ">>{colormefeminist} : Intel committee representative Adam Schiff [gaslighted Tucker Carlson](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRcP9DYjAQ&t=7m) by saying he is an apologist for the Kremlin because Carlson wanted Schiff to admit that Russia hacked Podesta's emails. Schiff refused to say this and got personal with Carlson, trying to make him question his integrity. Good thing Carlson saw right through it. Is this acceptable to everyone else?", ">>{987f} : It's insane that you guys profess the perill of fake news, then you elevate *Teen Vogue* because they agree with your preconceived notions of how the world works. It's insane! What happened to you, reddit?", ">>{MissionStyle} : Their team won. America lost... But they don't care. Sad thing is, they won't care no matter what is done. It's a scary time we live in.", ">>{disinterstedparty} : Maybe he meant, has Trump ever stopped raping his wives' sons?", ">>{so--what} : Pretty simple. Fake news means fabricated stories, lies with intent. Not bias or collusion or editorializing or errors. There is nothing fabricated in this article even if you disagree with the point it's making.", '>>{Lokismoke} : Anyone else remember the Vice-President debate. "He never said that"', '>>{rznfcc} : Trump won the Presidency by gas light. His rise to power has awakened a force of bigotry by ... normalizing deception. Hillary perfected "normalizing deception". Be it Bengazi, her foundation, or her attempt to circumvent federal law by maintaining an unsecured server in her home and lying repeatedly about it, she is the queen of normalizing deception. Not to even mention her subversion of votes for those favoring Bernie. The American people saw through her deception and gave her the boot. Here\'s to hoping we never have to see her face in the midst of any public policy debate again.', '>>{987f} : >The CIA officially determined that Russia intervened in our election False. Find me one official direct source of this information from the CIA itself. No media filter. >It wasn\'t one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. False. This is an example of purposeful misinterpretation of language to support a perspective. >the President-elect\'s attempt to undermine the American people\'s access to that information Sort of like pushing blame of an email leak to "Russian spies" like it\'s the Cold War era... >Trump won the Presidency by gas light False. He won by actually campaigning on the things Americans actually care about. Race issues are over. Gender issues are over. Sexuality issues are over. Identity politics are over. We\'re all equal. >His rise to power has awakened a force of bigotry by condoning and encouraging hatred, but also by normalizing deception. False. Clinton supporters are those who reject other\'s point of view which is the definition of bigotry. >Civil rights are now on trial, though before we can fight to reassert the march toward equality, we must regain control of the truth. False. Trump has never said anything against American\'s rights. He\'s the first President elect to support gay marriage. He has appointed more women to his cabinet than any other president elect. I could keep going. Surprisingly, TeenVogue is not a good source of information.', ">>{WinkleCream} : The question is how do we win at least part of Trump's coalition back to the non-fascist side of American politics?", '>>{JacobCrim88} : This was someones argument to me about that: > Well it was his pageant, so technically he owned those girls for the time being. *smdh*', '>>{so--what} : >Find me one official direct source of this information from the CIA itself. No media filter. So the only way you will believe this story is if a CIA official breaks the law to talk to you in person ("no media filter") about state secrets pertaining to an ongoing investigation concerning cyberwarfare between superpowers? Is this your standard of evidence?', '>>{2legit2fart} : Because this election was about deporting "illegal", rapist Mexicans, and banning Muslims. His supporters did not care about equality, of any kind.', '>>{987f} : My standard of evidence is proof. Saying "I heard this from somebody" is not proof. It would not hold up in court or in a scientific laboratory. When I say proof, I mean actual proof. Do you realize how insane it is that you have *zero* standard for proof?', ">>{Blacksheep2134} : > Clinton supporters are those who reject other's point of view which is the definition of bigotry. As we all know, opposing bigotry is the real bigotry. Check your privilege people who think lesbians exist!", '>>{Blacksheep2134} : Your argument was essentially, "nuh uh, you!", it wasn\'t deserving of anything more.', '>>{smith-smythesmith} : A significant chunk of them were simply anti-Hillary-at-all-costs. Remove her from the equation and you have one less roadblock, irrational though it may have been.', ">>{so--what} : There is no proof of the existence of external world, by the way. You believe in it nonetheless, because fortunately, perfect proof isn't a reasonable standard of evidence for anything, much less the complicated and confusing world of human affairs : >it is the mark of an educated mind to look for precision in each class of things just so far as the nature of the subject admits; it is evidently equally foolish to accept probable reasoning from a mathematician and to demand from a rhetorician scientific proof (Aristotle, *Nichomachean Ethics*, I,3) It's also very hypocritical, considering most of what you said before has never met the standard of evidence you require from the CIA story. Your weak rhetorical trick is transparent : it is meant to preemptively move the goalposts indefinitely. You think you are casting reasonable suspicion regarding this story, but the only thing you're doing is showing just how far you're ready to apply double standards to bury your head in the sand.", ">>{musterkeaton} : We're just trying to keep the ones we have, thanks.", '>>{WinkleCream} : It is not irrational to not want to vote for a corporatist centrist pretending to be a progressive.', ">>{987f} : A scientist or courtroom would accept proof of the external world. What the fuck are you talking about? Nihilism is totally irrelevant. I just want hard proof, rather than hear-say from anonymous sources. That is a wholly reasonable request. I have an anonymous source at the CIA says Russia wasn't behind the hack. Boom. You have to believe that because I have an anonymous source! Nothing I said fails the test of legal or scientific proof. The goal post is scientific or legal proof. Not moving at all. I demand actual, hard evidence. All of us living in the real world, use hard evidence to determine what the real world is like.", '>>{ghotier} : It is if the other side is worse, yes.', '>>{WinkleCream} : If you vote out of fear I pity you.', '>>{smith-smythesmith} : It is if you live in a swing state and the alternative is a sentient orange scrotum.', ">>{thudstroke} : > It wasn't one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. > False. This is an example of purposeful misinterpretation of language to support a perspective. How the fuck do you interpret numbers then? Trump's victory was the 12th smallest margin of victory out of our 57 elections. 45 elections ended with a larger margin of victory. 45/57=.79. 79% of elections had a larger margin of victory. If you were in the 21st percentile of intelligence (which you might be) would you say you were one of the smartest people? If you came last place in a 5 person race would you say you were one of the fastest people? Jesus fucking Christ. Use some fucking common sense for once.", ">>{WinkleCream} : Corporatist centrists don't win against populist authoritarians, did you learn that lesson?", '>>{987f} : It was a victory. It was an electoral college victory. It was a big victory because it was unexpected. Name an election where the mainstream media called it more wrong. Therefore it was one of the biggest electoral victories.', '>>{so--what} : Oh, this is embarassing... you don\'t know what an anonymous source is in journalism. It\'s not like a phone tip to the cops. They are only anonymous *to the public*, for their safety. The reporters, editors and lawyers of the newspaper all know who the sources are and can vouch for them. So when an accredited news source says "CIA officials say X", it means at least two actual CIA officials confirmed it on the record. I\'m sorry your education system failed to teach you media literacy. At any rate, the claim that Russia hacked the US can\'t be tested in a lab and never will be brought to court. So again, the charge that you set up impossible epistemic standards for the matter at hand still holds. Nevermind that this is being extremely dishonest. Indeed, most of the stuff we reasonably believe in our day to day life (and about political matters) could never even theoretically meet these standards of evidence.', '>>{rollerhen} : They can clean up america now that they have control of the three branches of government and the educational system. The 7 mountains they are trying to control are: * Media (Bannon, Ailes, Trump) * Government (Gop controlled almost 100%) * Religion (Judeo-Christian - aka Fundamentalist Christian ) * Arts & entertainment (video games alt-right, Star Wars boycotts, Trump, etc) * Education (Betsy DeVos, defund public school system, creationism, enrich bible schools) * Business (Mercer, DeVos, prosperity gospel) * Family (This is where religion belongs, IMO) https://www.generals.org/rpn/the-seven-mountains/ The Seven Mountains of Societal Influence In 1975, Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade and Loren Cunningham, founder of Youth With a Mission(YWAM), developed a God-given, world-changing strategy. Their mandate: Bring Godly change to a nation by reaching its seven spheres, or mountains, of societal influence. They concluded that in order to truly transform any nation with the Gospel of Jesus Christ, these seven facets of society must be reached: Religion, Family,Education, Government, Media, Arts & Entertainment and Business. The Reformation Prayer Network’s primary goal is to be a catalyst, through prayer and righteous activism, which will bring change to these areas of societal influence. 1. RELIGION Every society has some type of belief in a superior being or beings. In the east, religions tend to be polytheistic (many gods) or outright idolatrous (such as Hinduism and Buddhism). Although these religions are thousands of years old, they nonetheless continue to thrive today. In the west, Christianity and Catholicism are predominant, but postmodern views are increasingly being accepted and the concept of God is being rejected. This is especially true in Europe. The Christian Church is described in the Greek language as the ecclesia. Literally translated, the word ecclesia means “governing body.” Although we don’t condone theocracies, this translation suggests that the Church should have great influence in all other spheres that make up a society. With a plethora of categorized religions around the world, it’s the Church’s responsibility to reach the lost with the love and Gospel of Jesus Christ, and expand the Kingdom in ministerial efforts, both nationally and internationally. 2. FAMILY In any functional society, the family is the “building block” of the community. Throughout the Bible, you will find familial examples that portray how we ought to live our lives today. God desires that men, women, and children within a family be united as one in His love. After all, He is the ultimate Father (Romans 8:14-17). The families of the United States have been under constant and prolonged attack. Today, the assailants are fatherlessness, divorce (50% rate in secular and Christian marriages), abuse, homosexual marriage, pornography, and other negative influences have brought great dysfunction to American life. God is calling fathers and mothers (both spiritual and biological) to bring order to the chaos that the enemy has unleashed against families in America. He also wants to bring healing to marriages and relationships within families in order to maintain a moral foundation for children in the future to stand upon. 3. EDUCATION At one time the education system of America unapologetically incorporated the Bible, prayer to the God of the Bible, and biblical values in every aspect of school life. Not coincidentally, this system produced a people that produced the most powerful and prosperous nation the earth has ever seen. Now, the children of our nation are inundated with liberal ideologies, atheistic teaching and postmodern principles in our public schools and in most universities (including many Christian institutions). Put simply; they are being indoctrinated with often false, biased and anti-biblical information. A re-introduction of biblical truth and Bible-centric values is the key to renewal and restoration in America’s failing educational system. 4. GOVERNMENT Proverbs 14:34 states that, “righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people.” Many times, as exemplified in the Old Testament, a nation’s moral standards are dependent on those exhibited by its leaders (or predominant political party). While each individual is responsible for his or her own sins; the fact remains that people are greatly influenced by those moral (or lack thereof) that popular leaders adopt. The progressive liberal agenda, empowered by well-known men and women in the arts and entertainment industries, have made significant gains in the political arena over the past few decades. In fact, many liberal groups, such as the ACLU, seek to remove anything related to God or Christianity from the governmental and educational systems because of a misapplied interpretation of the phrase, “separation of church and state.” We must see a shift in this arena in order to preserve the Christian heritage that America was founded upon. The goal is to put in place righteous political leaders that will positively affect all aspects of government. 5. MEDIA The media mountain includes news sources such as radio, TV news stations, newspapers, Internet news and opinion (blog) sites and etc. The media has the potential to sway popular opinion on current issues based upon its reporting, which is not always truthful or accurate. In the 2008 elections, the liberal “elite” media played a vital role, especially in the Presidential race. Their generally supportive and positive reporting greatly influenced the outcome. There has been a rise in Christian news services, which is needed. However, to bring transformation to the mountain of media, Christians who are gifted for and called into this type of work must be willing to report righteously and truthfully in the secular marketplace. 6. ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT In this mountain we find some of the most influential forces shaping our society. Music, filmmaking, television, social media, and the performing arts drive the cultural tastes, values and standards of a nation’s citizens, particularly its youth. With a heavy reliance on the strong appeal of sex, drugs and alcohol, the arts and entertainment industries wield significant influence. The body of Christ needs powerful, righteous men and women who are not afraid to take their God-given talent into the arts and entertainment arenas. People ready to further His purposes, while impacting those who are lost in darkness and would not otherwise be interested in any kind of Christian message in traditional forms. 7. BUSINESS The ability to literally create wealth through ingenuity, enterprise, creativity and effort and is a God-given gift and a universal impulse. The markets and economic systems that emerge whenever people are free to pursue buying and selling become the lifeblood of a nation. This includes anything from farms to small businesses to large corporations. Of course this realm is prone to corruption through idolatry, greed and covetousness. In response, the Church must embrace its responsibility to train up those who are called into the marketplace to manage businesses and provide leadership with integrity and honesty. We believe it is the Lord’s will to make his people prosperous and that He desires for His Church to use its wealth to finance the work of Kingdom expansion. Simply put: Prosperity with a purpose. Edit: typo, clarification', '>>{so--what} : >The Mets won 1-0. It was a baseball victory. It was a big victory because it was unexpected. The sports analysts had it all wrong. >Therefore, it was one of the biggest victories in baseball. Pretty sure that in context, "big electoral college victory" means "election won by a big margin of electoral votes." It\'s not one of the biggest margins.', '>>{987f} : When the Cubs won the world series it was one of the biggest victories in baseball history because nobody expected it. Your logic is incorrect.', '>>{CollumMcJingleballs} : Teen Vogue is the real shit we need now.', '>>{thudstroke} : Now who\'s misrepresenting language to support a perspective? If that\'s what you were trying to say there are other ways to say it. "Upset", "historic", "unpredictable". All those words describe better what you were trying to describe using "biggest". But I know what you\'re doing. The russian propoganda "firehose of falshood". Just spew complete nonsense so people lose all sense of what\'s right and wrong. That way we can\'t have a rational discussion about issues because we are in two different realities.', '>>{so--what} : Good thing that wasn\'t my example. Also a good thing : I explained what a "big electoral college victory" means. Your reading skills are poor.', '>>{ghotier} : Okay. I pity me because not enough people voted out of fear and now we should all be afraid.', ">>{WinkleCream} : If enough people had voted out of hope for a real progressive like Sanders we wouldn't be in this mess.", '>>{987f} : Smug pretentious leftist. You\'re a stereotype. The media precludes their use anonymous source privileges when they are **actively doxxing the source of an anonymous leak.** Assange said it was *not* the Russian government. He knows who it was. That can be proved. He has hard evidence that can be tested. So you were wrong. The reason you say this: >most of the stuff we reasonably believe in our day to day life (and about political matters) could never even theoretically meet these standards of evidence. And include "we" is because you want to deny responsibility, and would rather remain in your gaslighted bubble.', ">>{987f} : You don't get to define what things mean. You are not an authority.", ">>{spotted_dick} : They will care when they are living on cabbage soup for sustenance, and dying 'cos they can't get health care. Or maybe they'll still blame the democrats.", ">>{so--what} : >Assange said it was *not* the Russian government. He knows who it was. That can be proved. He has hard evidence that can be tested. So you were wrong. Well, that it *can* be proved is irrelevent until it has. Why do you believe Assange? He doesn't follow your own standards : he hasn't brought his evidence in a lab or in a courtroom -- where, incidentally, he is still awaited for his rape case.", ">>{so--what} : I haven't defined anything. I just stated what is obvious to competent language users.", ">>{staringinto_space} : > It wasn't one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. >> False. This is an example of purposeful misinterpretation of language to support a perspective. So, just to make sure, you are arguing that this is the biggest EC victory in history? If that's what you are arguing you are woefully ignorant of the facts. Your other points are also lame", ">>{bulgarianwoebegone} : >My standard for evidence is proof. >False. He won by actually campaigning on the things Americans actually care about. **Race issues are over. Gender issues are over. Sexuality issues are over. Identity politics are over. We're all equal.** Please provide proof for these claims.", ">>{Gasonfires} : I was surprised that this is really pretty solid stuff, especially the linked [primer on how to avoid getting suckered by fake news](https://docs.google.com/document/d/10eA5-mCZLSS4MQY5QGb5ewC3VAL6pLkT53V_81ZyitM/preview). And I don't think there is any better advice in the entire article proper than this: >Refuse to accept information simply because it is fed to you, and don't be afraid to ask questions.", '>>{magataga} : Teen Vogue is a better source of news on the president elect than the New York freaking Times. We live in the age of the Apocalypse. Surely this must be a sign of the end times.', ">>{ghotier} : I did vote for Sanders. But enough people thought that a person who is basically the status quo for a career politician was as bad as a science denying authoritarian internet troll that we got the least qualified, scariest President elect in history. So go ahead and condescend and pity me, but I hope you're also putting energy into fixing the problem and not just castigating people on the Internet.", '>>{theamazingjex} : Dont worry, the New York Times will find the smoking gun in those Clinton emails aaaaaaaanyday now. God knows they cant admit they made a mistake.', ">>{theamazingjex} : I'm sure that he will realize he made a mistake and apologize.", '>>{gu4po} : > gaslighting (Buzzword of the Year) > teenvogue.com > 86% upvoted https://i.imgur.com/pWcGkFs.gif', ">>{johnnynutman} : I didn't even know there were 15 year olds, only adults.", ">>{underwaterpizza} : Certainly not equal yet. Facts gathered by independent groups contradict this point at every turn. Incarceration rates, dropout rates, pay-gap, refusal of service to lgbt people, the list goes on and on. How about you do some actual research before you make dumb claims to support your dumbass president-elect. Oh, yeah, and we will see about this Russia thing. Still doesn't excuse him for questioning the legitimacy of the CIA. He is skipping briefings and calling their intelligence into question. It may not be perfect, but it is the best we have.", '>>{underwaterpizza} : What? People expected it. The only thing in the way was a fake curse...', '>>{underwaterpizza} : He can\'t, because he is projecting. "I can\'t substantiate my claims so I will just say that you can\'t either" Too bad for him we can.', ">>{underwaterpizza} : Let's have some proof! Oh wait, you can only provide RT, Breitbart, and you crazy uncle. She's a corporatist shill, but people have still yet to prove anything other than her incompetence in setting up an email server", ">>{chowderbags} : They're blame Jews, Atheists, Blacks, Muslims, gays, etc, and that's just to start. Then they'll start blaming the people who aren't the right *kind* of Christian, probably Catholics, Quakers, and liberal Protestants. The one thing a fundamentalist hates more than the heathen is the heretic.", '>>{chowderbags} : Soon Tiger Beat will be writing articles on Trump\'s cabinet picks and Cosmogirl will have an article entitled "15 Ways To Know If Your President Or Boyfriend Are A Russian Puppet (And What To Do About It!)".', ">>{workerbotsuperhero} : > She's a corporatist shill, but people have still yet to prove anything other than her incompetence in setting up an email server Meanwhile, just recently the president-elect has been involved in: * that [$25M federal fraud lawsuit settlement](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/source-trump-nearing-settlement-in-trump-university-fraud-cases/2016/11/18/8dc047c0-ada0-11e6-a31b-4b6397e625d0_story.html?utm_term=.78834f0094a5) * the insane [Russian hacking/election tampering scandal](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-orders-review-of-russian-hacking-during-presidential-campaign/2016/12/09/31d6b300-be2a-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html?utm_term=.c63eb46009b7) And his new appointments include: * the surgeon who - incredibly - [doesn't believe in darwinian evolution](http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/ben-carson-argued-evolution-was-encouraged-satan) * the former Breitbart CEO who made money [denigrating jews, immigrants, and women](http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/08/17/breitbart-news-worst-headlines/212467) * a would-be attorney general [dogged by decades of accusations of racism](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/18/that-time-the-senate-denied-jeff-sessions-a-federal-judgeship-over-accusations-of-racism/?utm_term=.dbded77cdf9a) * an EPA chief who [denies scientific knowledge and consensus,](http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/07/politics/trump-picks-scott-pruitt-to-head-epa/) preferring disinformation promoted by the industries he is charged with regulating * an FDA commissioner who thinks [the FDA should stop testing drugs for safety and efficacy](https://www.statnews.com/2016/12/07/trump-fda-oneill/) before they are sold to the public But let's talk more about that email server, and how bad it was, and how that's the biggest problem here for America.", ">>{iamjacksprofile} : Teen Vogue? Is that what we've become? This place has become an embarrassment. There's plenty of I hate Trump articles that arent written by Teen Vogue that can be posted.", '>>{Downbound92} : > a man that brags about bursting in on 15 year olds in changing rooms, and gets a chub when he runs into 10 year olds in public, [But, Hillary is the one organizing a child sex ring.](https://media.giphy.com/media/Fml0fgAxVx1eM/giphy.gif)', ">>{mainliningfbs} : Let's not forget about the 13 year old he raped who recanted her statements.", '>>{WinkleCream} : Obama won on hope and change. Clinton lost on the status quo, just like Gore did. I hope you Democrats learn your lesson, it is embarrassing how many presidential elections you have lost in 30 years.', ">>{warblox} : They won't care even after they starve to death. The Silver lining of them starving to death is that their opinion won't matter if they're dead.", ">>{warblox} : > Religion (Judio-Christian) Religion is strictly Christian. The alt-right hates Jews and can't wait to genocide them.", '>>{warblox} : My go-to for now is WaPo. They ran an editorial today titled "Trump is actually a fascist."', ">>{warblox} : Don't forget making the CEO of ExxonMobil Secretary of State.", '>>{underwaterpizza} : Gonna steal this and share it with people, keep up the good work', ">>{donkeybaster} : Most Americans don't want socialist Sanders, tough shit.", '>>{WinkleCream} : Clinton primary voters are the sole reason Trump won.', ">>{donkeybaster} : Lol, that socialist dork Sanders had no chance. She beat him by more votes than what she leads the popular vote over Trump with. The majority of Americans wouldn't vote for a weak ass socialist and nobody believes they would but his cult. He was a sore loser and tried to take the country down with him.", ">>{WinkleCream} : Ah, name calling. How mature. Clinton lost because her supporters were toxic and vicious at everyone who wasn't *with her*. So Americans voted for Trump to spite those hateful Clinton supporters. Think back of all the names you have called Trump and Sanders supporters this election. Now, next time you look in the mirror, realize you elected Donald Trump, no one else, you.", ">>{donkeybaster} : >. Clinton lost because her supporters were toxic and vicious at everyone who wasn't with her. Are you Donald Trump? Cause you are projecting like him. The only ones using that phrase were Bernie Bros, who are the most insufferable toddlers on the Internet. >Now, next time you look in the mirror, realize you elected Donald Trump, no one else, you. Again with the projecting. Get out of your bubble and talk to a person sometime. Bernie Sanders had NO chance. He did dupe a lot of people on reddit into thinking he did . He is a dangerous idiot.", '>>{donkeybaster} : If the name fits, which it does. Bernie Sanders is the best thing that happened to the GOP.', ">>{workerbotsuperhero} : > making the CEO of ExxonMobil Secretary of State. Honestly, I'm wondering how much time we have before the oil company executives who are now our leaders are calling for an another invasion of an oil producing country. What should we do when that starts happening again?", '>>{rollerhen} : Typo - should have written Judeo-Christian and that is a reference to Fundamentalist Christian.', ">>{ghotier} : Good deflection. I hope you don't enjoy having rights, because you're about to have fewer of them. It sounds to me like you just didn't vote and now you're looking to blame everyone else for this. I'm not in a swing state, I looked at third party candidates, and they were all crazy. So I voted for not crazy, but sure, be proud of yourself for not voting for the one not crazy candidate.", '>>{WinkleCream} : Stop assuming you know anything about me stranger, thanks.', ">>{Dravvie} : I'm kind of glad that they're teaching teenage girls that this isn't sane healthy or normal even if this will be the status quo from the president for the next few years politically.", '>>{Huck77} : The right has become very good at manufacturing hate for up and comers on the left. Look at how long they have been working on taking down Hillary.', '>>{MostlyDrunkalready} : His "argument" consisted of almost every logical fallacy. I would say it deserved ridicule more than sarcasm.', '>>{sickweekafter} : cool. gaslighting now doesnt mean anything. Or would Hillary lying on the campaign trail be gaslighting?', ">>{mirh} : > other than her incompetence in setting up an email server Which let's remember, was probably [more secure](http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/state-department-slaps-top-secret-on-22-e-mails-found-on-clintons-server/) in hindsight than DOD ones.", '>>{mirh} : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sarah-palin-crony-capitalism-carrier_us_58420349e4b017f37fe4c443 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/just-when-you-thought-the-trump-ethics-disaster-couldnt-get-worse-it-did/2017/01/16/001db550-dc04-11e6-ad42-f3375f271c9c_story.html http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/01/trump-team-reportedly-wants-to-strip-fcc-of-consumer-protection-powers/ Is there a sub/list for all this shit?']]

classify and reply

[">>{whatsinaname1212} : Trump's rallies give a boost to president and his supporters", '>>{space-elevator} : Trump hypocrisy on display days after campaigning with anti-LGBTQ activists in Orlando', '>>{space-elevator} : Chad Griffin, president of HRC, today made the following statement responding to Donald Trump’s “foreign policy” speech: “The same Donald Trump who today railed against ISIS hate stood shoulder-to-shoulder with anti-LGBTQ activists five days ago in Orlando, just miles from Pulse nightclub," said HRC President Chad Griffin. "This is the same Donald Trump whose campaign manager is in the headlines today for allegedly taking millions from allies of one of the world\'s worst anti-LGBTQ dictators, and who has campaigned on promises of more anti-LGBTQ Supreme Court justices. This is also the same Donald Trump who put Mike Pence, one of the most prominent faces of discrimination in America today, on the ticket. Meanwhile, we don\'t have to guess at how Hillary Clinton will advance LGBTQ equality on a global stage -- because that\'s exactly what she did as Secretary of State. Long before Donald Trump struggled to read the letters \'LGBTQ\' off a teleprompter, Secretary Clinton went before the international community to declare that "gay rights are human rights," launched the Global Equality Fund, and pioneered the first-ever UN resolution protecting LGBTQ people.” On the two-month anniversary of the Pulse nightclub shooting last week, which took the lives of 49 LGBTQ people and allies, Trump courted anti-LGBTQ activists just 10 miles from the site of the tragedy in Orlando. Among the organizations attending was Liberty Counsel, which supports and defends archaic laws criminalizing homosexuality with harsh punishments around the world, and has condemned President Obama and the U.S. government for speaking out against such laws, saying, “America should not be trying to make that country act in an immoral way.” In 2011, Liberty Counsel Chairman Mat Staver said that American opposition to the criminalization of homosexuality is “immoral.” He said, “More than sixty countries have laws criminalizing homosexuality and virtually every country in the world has laws that criminalize pedophilia and child incest. Malawi was doing what it was doing in its own best interest and America should not be trying to make that country act in an immoral way.” In 2013, Staver said that Russia was “reaffirming marriage….and rejecting this radicalized Homosexual agenda.” Liberty Counsel’s Matt Barber went further in 2014, praising Russia, by saying it was trying to, “...stop this homosexual activist propaganda from corrupting children in our nation, and we need to see that right here in the United States.’” Trump has also doubled down on his anti-LGBTQ agenda by putting Indiana Gov. Mike Pence on the ticket. Pence became a national disgrace in 2015, for his “license to discriminate” bill that could have allowed businesses to deny service to LGBTQ people -- and for subsequently defending the bill after an outcry from the business community and a majority of Hoosier voters. In a now notorious interview with ABC last year, Pence refused to answer eight separate times when asked whether businesses should be able to discriminate against LGBTQ people. In recent weeks, Trump has also campaigned alongside Tony Perkins -- leader of the Family Research Council, which has been designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.', '>>{KorgRue} : White Trump Supporter charged with murder in mosque killing. Time to ban white trump supporters.', '>>{bbiggs32} : Radical White Nationalist Terrorism. Edit: Radical Christian White Nationalist Terrorism Thanks for the tip.', '>>{whatsinaname1212} : He is building momentum again folks, analysts are saying this is the type of wave that washed him into the White House folks!! This is amazing', ">>{CaulkusAurelis} : Well, it's not like he WROTE the article.... or...", ">>{CaulkusAurelis} : at this point, I'd be willing to lay some serious coin that DT would ENGAGE in some of these activities, if it would save his bid", '>>{throwawatc123} : Right? I\'m surprised they didn\'t have a "God hates f*gs" rally across the street from Pulse afterwards.', ">>{CompactedConscience} : Trump supporters have given up on substantive arguments and have resorted to pointing out the age of people's accounts.", ">>{GeriatriCroc} : So refreshing to see a President that doesn't lose touch with his boss, the PEOPLE.", '>>{Average_Autist} : Account is only 9 days old, still has bigger hands than Trump.', '>>{Isstvan82} : 9 is a good number, for a NAMBLA supporter like Trump.', '>>{tangibleadhd} : >Trump has also doubled down on his anti-LGBTQ agenda by putting Indiana Gov. Mike Pence on the ticket. Pence became a national disgrace in 2015, for his “license to discriminate” bill that could have allowed businesses to deny service to LGBTQ people -- and for subsequently defending the bill after an outcry from the business community and a majority of Hoosier voters. In a now notorious interview with ABC last year, Pence refused to answer eight separate times when asked whether businesses should be able to discriminate against LGBTQ people.', '>>{Scoutandabout} : Until we figure out what the hell is going on...', '>>{HansEmbiid} : I hope to see you (and all Trump supporters) defending mainstream Muslims now. Unless you believe that Trumpism is inherently an ideology of hate and violence.', ">>{Cyanity} : You know a presidential candidate is bad when their attending of an anti-LGBT gathering two months after the Pulse nightclub shooting isn't even the worst thing he's done all week. Trump is the gift that keeps on giving.", '>>{sikeston} : The White House’s strangely strong denial that its ‘deportation force’ idea is back', '>>{knox3} : Heaven forbid they strongly deny a leak that makes them look like buffoons.', ">>{TimRigginsPanther} : Works well to keep his base of worshippers happy, but it makes him look like a joke to those who don't already support him.", '>>{uhmmaybe} : Interesting fun fact. So what are you trying to say?', ">>{Cayde-187} : Aren't lies just denials by another name? For this administration, anyway...", '>>{HerMileHighness} : Ban them from what, OP? I mean, the guy also was an atheist and a Katy Perry fan. Should we ban them, too?', '>>{wraithtek} : Well it\'s pretty clear that Trump\'s deportation force is in full effect, even if they *don\'t* call in the National Guard as that document suggests they might. They\'re deporting immigrants protected under DACA, and those who have been law abiding/complying with immigration officials. They can\'t pretend they\'re only rounding up the "bad hombres" Trump so often mentions.', '>>{FlyingSquid} : We strongly deny it will be 10,000 troops! It will be twice that at least!', ">>{dongazine_supplies} : Look, I am not a Trump supporter, but this is dumb, and just undermining the media's credibility. You guys want this big flashy story so you're over-reaching for it when it's not actually there. And in the meantime there is plenty of stuff to talk about that's actually real, like ICE hitting courtrooms and battered womens' shelters. Calm down, stop being in a race to break the Big Story that will finally prove Trump is Hitler, and start showing some judgment and restraint about what is actually newsworthy.", '>>{IWasRightOnce} : Crazy how not a single news outlet is talking about this It would be everywhere if the shooter had turned out to be Muslim', '>>{PresidentChaos} : Fun Fact! Trump opened his Orlando campaign office right across the street from the Pulse Nightclub crime scene.', '>>{smoochmybumper} : These so called anti-LGBTQ activists are nothing compared to radical Islamists that Hillary wants to import en masse.', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : Surprised the All Lives Matters crowd isn't out protesting for this guy.", '>>{dolphins3} : Say it with me now: radical Christian terrorism.', '>>{jk2007} : So once again - Spicey is caught lying. Jesus, it just never ends. >The White House quickly denied it, with press secretary Sean Spicer saying it\'s "100 percent not true. It is false. It is irresponsible to be saying this.”', '>>{James-Delaney} : >guy also was an atheist and a Katy Perry fan probably', '>>{XHF} : I wish more people hear about who the shooter was. There are so many people on social media right now blaming Muslim refugees for the attack and blaming Justin Trudeau for letting it happen.', '>>{SNStains} : Skepticism is a good thing, but AP claims the memo is authentic.', '>>{Scoutster13} : Tacky but who is surprised? This was not an accident.', '>>{Scoutster13} : Oh please - these folks would love to throw some gay people off a roof - how the hell do you live lying like that to yourself?', '>>{dongazine_supplies} : Right the memo is real, but the idea was discarded at a fairly early / low level of planning.', '>>{beermile} : Everyone knows *actual* terrorists are of the absolute most sound mind possible!', '>>{SNStains} : Reassuring if true. Your source on this is Spicer? Not dissing you, just noting that these people are liars.', ">>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : So it's kind of off topic, but when the fuck did we start adding a Q to it. It used to just be LGBT not too long ago?", '>>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : So this may be a bit off topic, but when the fuck did they add a "Q" to the end of the acronym? If memory serves, it was just LGBT in the very, very recent past, was it not?', '>>{TheSocialDynamicist} : He is certainly picking up speed in his plunge to the bottom.', ">>{dongazine_supplies} : The DHS. > these people are liars If you can't see any gradiations in credibility between Kelly and Matthis and Priebus and Spicer and Trump then I think you're going to have a hard time making sense of things.", ">>{KorgRue} : I know not all. It was a snark meant to call attention to the failings of this Executive Order. I don't really think we should start banning Trump supporters.", '>>{data2dave} : I think Obama should have done this and it would have been much more polished. Remember the disaster of 2010? Obama pretty much holed up while his ACA rolled out and he tried to appease Republicans with cuts to Social Security and did little to rally supporters. I always see him with nose in the air, beautiful but vague speech and limp hands flopping. We Democrats need FDR back again or Bernie Sanders (younger version) not more appeasers like Obama. 2010 was his worse year. Passed ACA but lost the Congressional midterms in a massive overthrow. But Trump is a dangerous conman selling out America. Keep up the Rally\'s dude so the opposition can come and show who is really the "people".', ">>{fakebooze} : I thought my sarcasm was evident with the yadda yaddah yaddah. I'll delete.", ">>{SNStains} : I'm a little at a loss as why we should be expected to discern degrees of mendaciousness, or even accept conflicting messages. I mean the root of the problem is obvious, Trump doesn't really know what he's doing and doesn't seem to worry about it much. If getting worked up compels them to get their shit together how is that a bad thing? It seems evident that public outrage (protest, etc.) does prompt them to *try* and land on a consistent message, whether it's acceptable or not. If you're worried about people losing steam, I wouldn't. It looks like things are just beginning to heat up.", ">>{dxtboxer} : The most inclusive one these days is LGBTQIA I believe. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual. As someone in the 'G' category, I still just say LGBT. The Q is usually added by sorta hardcore liberals and people like Trump who are pretending to be inclusive and progressive by using the longer form. EDIT: can the people who are down voting me explain why instead of just hitting the button and moving on?", ">>{Pylons} : I've also heard some wanting to change it to GSRM (Gender, Sexual, and Romantic Minorities).", ">>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : So I'm probably not going to severely offend anyone if I simply continue using the traditional LGBT acronym?", '>>{whatsinaname1212} : Calling Obama an appeaser is silly at best. The Donbama was the best thing to happen to the dems in a very long time. It will be a while before they get a politician like him again. Do you know how many presidents tried to get something like ACA done and failed? Maybe you should look it up.', '>>{data2dave} : Heritage Care or Romney Care. I don\'t like Rahm but he was correct-- Obama needed to focus on Bettering the Economy, not Healthcare. No public option, no reduced provider extortion costs. And betrayal of the Primary voters who were told "no mandate". Instead O could have broke up the big banks, put a few in jail, rallied with the Occupy movement, given no quarter to the Republicans-- these moves are how FDR united the nation and led to a huge Democratic majority. Obama I realize was attacked by racists but they are not a majority. He then could have pushed through higher taxes to bring broadband for all (rural America), and major infrastructure improvements. ProWall Street lawyer Eric Holder didn\'t do any favors either. Ignore the skin color, look at the elitist pretensions. Obama has an adorable family but I always wished Michelle could have punched out a few Republicans on camera (figuratively). She seemed to have more of the spirit that was needed!', '>>{whatsinaname1212} : > Obama needed to focus on Bettering the Economy Where you in asleep or in a coma in the last 5 years of the Bush era? Do you remember what the economy was like?', '>>{simxc} : Just to keep the nation safe! We have to defend ourselves from Radical White Terrorism.', '>>{data2dave} : Sounding like a condescending Clintonista. Yea. Bernacki, Nanci and Paulson did the Bailout prior to Obama\'s election. That stopped the crash then Obama asked for a woefully small stimulus package that didn\'t do those "shovel ready projects". But he did call the Market bottom and told us to buy stocks. Thus next to Calvin Coolidge he had the biggest bullrun. But did it help poor blacks (and whites)? Nada! Wealthy people did great under Obama. The slow, slow recovery for Main Street while Wall Street boomed is the real story of the last 8 years .,. And thus Trump. The worse result of Obama\'s years.', '>>{smaIl_talk} : Probably not, but I would at least add the Q as queer has come to mean just outside of the normative spectrum. I also like how it sounds better with the Q at the end lol', '>>{dongazine_supplies} : My worry is what rhetorical position does the mainstream media need to take to drop Trump\'s approval through its "floor". The current approach isn\'t going to do it, not by a long shot.', '>>{KorgRue} : It is snark to call attention to the failings of this EO. Not meant to be taken literally my friend.', ">>{Sadsackashit} : No no, it's me. I've had a few beers 😊", '>>{Kaprak} : You should be fine, hell I know very opinionated LGBT people who don\'t think the "A" belongs there. If you upset someone for using the shorthand they\'re probably looking for a reason.', ">>{sakipooh} : Thanks Trump for inspiring your god damn fanatic base. The sad part is that I'm sure there are a lot more of them out there just waiting to impress the orange Hitler.", ">>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : >If you upset someone for using the shorthand they're probably looking for a reason. Well, you don't get to be a grad student in political science without pissing a few people off along the way.", ">>{freshwordsalad} : Unfortunately, it also means the title doesn't match.", '>>{Victor_Zsasz} : So just across the street from the night club then? Or was the crime scene somewhere else?', ">>{IWasRightOnce} : This happened like an hour away from the US border. Obviously there is some level of difference having happened in Canada, but I don't buy for a second that that's all that's happening here I'm not saying it needs to dominate the news cycles but I have had the news on for the last 1.5 hours and it hasn't been mentioned once", ">>{SNStains} : It's not their job to drop Trump's ratings, he'll do that to himself. They just need to keep trying to get the truth out there *sans* bullshit. The truth isn't good for Trump; his ideas are generally terrible, ham-fisted responses to sometimes invented problems. The fascinating thing is watching how things are starting to evolve. Some have decided that having Kellyanne on is actually a waste of time. She's directly using up airtime and lines of print with lies. These lies then in turn need to be dealt with, using additional time and resources. Now it's two days later. Putting out this draft memo may be a better approach. It's real...it's out-of-date apparently, but it's real. And it prompted a quick, strong response. No mirk. No wasted time.", '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Folks at /r/Metacanada are pretty quiet on this given one of their like-minded fanboys did this.', '>>{sweggelo} : You have to say the words RADICAL WHITE NATIONALIST!', ">>{bryce7878} : It's normally just written LGBT but sometimes they add a q or an a to stand for questioning or asexual respectively. I prefer GSM for gender and sexual minorities because the alphabet soup thing gets a bit ridiculous sometimes.", ">>{VROF} : I really don't have much faith that the Trump administration has a staff real skilled at figuring things out.", ">>{mm365886} : He just met with 2 preists. They arent outright anti lgbt activists. Misleading title is misleading Edit: I understand i'm wrong but will not remove this post.", ">>{bryce7878} : If I had to choose between keeping my right to marry who I want and not be thrown out of my job or apartment for marrying them taken away by Trump supreme court nominees vs having the 0.00000002% chance of me being attacked by a radical Muslim downgraded to a 0.00000001% chance I think I'll choose the first one.", '>>{_Apophis} : Welcome to Trump\'s "United America" Unfortunately this doesn\'t surprise me. Just head on over to Breitbart and read the comments. Noting but outright racism, bigotry, and isolationists. It\'s a circlejerk of terrified people, just sad.', '>>{Stoaks} : How can Trump defeat Radical Christian Terrorism if he won\'t even say the term "Radical Christian Terrorism"?', ">>{NebraskaGunGrabber} : I've concluded we need to ban all immigration from nations with white nationalist parties. This is based on the number of terror attacks in North American since Trump came into office. Sorry Farage but you've got to go.", '>>{II-III-V-VII-XI} : And Fox News still has not removed their "Suspect in Quebec Mosque terror attack was of Moroccan origin, reports show" tweet. The tweet is 7 hours old. No doubt perpetuating the bullshit that the Killer is "Moroccan Muslim" thus feeding into Trump\'s using it as an example for the need of the ban.', '>>{veniceinperil} : So, the Republican voting rolls need to be heavily vetted and restricted from air travel. Time to lock them up at the airport.', '>>{Annihilicious} : Good. They will look fucking ridiculous in a matter of days.', '>>{Tarkmenistan} : They are actually claiming it was false flag, soros/Clinton, etc. Also Rebel Media is using it to spead fake news are asking for donations. https://therebel.nationbuilder.com/quebec-terror-donation', ">>{NotFooledbyFools} : I watched their 6 pm news and I didn't even see them talk about the shooting at all. (my computer did freeze up for a few minutes so I could have missed it) You can imagine the outrage if it was a Muslim that shot up a church though. It'd be 24/7.", '>>{_Apophis} : The dude who was missidentified is a reasonable level headed human. > "Don\'t want to post his name in my comment", 29, an engineering student originally from Morocco, said he was giving his friend first aid when he spotted someone with a weapon and fled to the mosque\'s parking lot, not realizing the person he saw was a cop. >"They saw me flee, they thought I was suspicious, that\'s normal," he told La Presse. " For them, someone who flees is a suspect."', ">>{geekwonk} : Yeah this definitely won't fall out of the MSM narrative now that it doesn't fit the predefined storyline.", '>>{GillBatesWindows10} : White man here. More afraid of a white man with a gun doing me in than I will ever be of a refugee.', ">>{apexidiot} : Just gotta get it on Morning Joe. It's the only way he'll see it.", '>>{esreveReverse} : That\'s over a quarter of the alphabet. At what point can we just use "ABC"?', ">>{MrMadcap} : Are we sure it's the radical kind? Not just the normal kind?", ">>{veniceinperil} : See, here's the thing about that. I suspect most Americans, or at least a reasonable majority--60-70%--are not actually racist. Trump is uniting Americans against White Nationalists and *him*.", '>>{Steven_Sr} : Report them. Account age notes and shill accusations are now bannable offenses.', ">>{SALON_SOLDIER} : Even fucking Vice is calling these white Trump supporting terrorists out. Is banning white Trump supporters an option we can take? Seriously, if you're a white person that voted for Trump you're fucking garbage.", '>>{2fortwell} : Not an atheist. He thought Donald Trump was God.', ">>{DonutsMcKenzie} : Trump probably hasn't even figured out how to adjust the height on his chair in the oval office yet...", '>>{NapoleonBonerparts} : But God really does hate figs. He killed that fig tree for like no reason in the bible.', ">>{robomonkey94} : Can we find a simpler name for lgbtq, it seems to keep growing..... Lgbtqrstuvwxyz, now I know my abc next time I'll identify gender correctly...", '>>{______5} : > Among the organizations attending was Liberty Counsel, which supports and defends archaic laws criminalizing homosexuality with harsh punishments around the world, and has condemned President Obama and the U.S. government for speaking out against such laws, saying, “America should not be trying to make that country act in an immoral way.” Lying redditor is full of shit.', ">>{II-III-V-VII-XI} : Absolutely. It'd be the top story with contributors claiming this is the reason the ban is required and the protesters are anti national security.", ">>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : I'm now getting accused by /u/Medym who mods both /r/Metacanada and /r/Canada -- banning people for speaking out against neo-nazi metacanadians. That subreddit is a toxic shithole that is part of the problem when discussing the radicalization of Canadian youth. They are radicalizing lonely white Canadians who then commit these acts of terrorism. This is what happened to skinheads in the 1970s.", '>>{CarmineFields} : It\'s about using just the tiniest speck of empathy. It\'s the same thing with holding it in Orlando. Why does the anti-gay "Christian" right need to be inconsiderate jackasses?', ">>{Human_FaintingGoat} : I think they just meant it's only been two months so Trump at the VERY least should have considered the optics of how fresh the shooting is still in the public's minds.", '>>{omeow} : >You have to say the words RADICAL WHITE NATIONALIST! Also say : Steve Bannon IS ONE OF THEM!!!!!!!!', '>>{_Apophis} : Yea I would agree, at the least I hope they begin to see how their rhetoric can move unstable people to do terrible things.', '>>{pillsneedlespowders} : I tend to just use queer honestly, which is a habit I picked up off of a bi friend of mine. It annoys a few people, but not many in my experience. Hell, just look at the bisexual cheer. "Here\'s to beers and queers and big brassieres!"', ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : So guilt by association. No thanks. Christians didn't shoot up the nightclub a Muslim did.", ">>{SALON_SOLDIER} : Here that white people? That's the sound of your time coming to an end. [It's over.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wb55teb1gJ0)", ">>{mr_charliejacobs} : i wouldn't go down that road if i were you.... christians have killed PLENTY of people, in the name of god! and i'm sure next time there is something floating about the internets, floated by the far right, about how Obama or Clinton associated with this person or that horrible group or person, you'll come to their aid and complain that one shouldn't be found guilty by association -- you know, just to be fair.", '>>{Tarkmenistan} : I have brought up the issues before but /u/medym and /u/lucky75 will activly shut down any post where you talk about it on /r/Canada. The Alt-right is moding /r/Canada I have asked several time to bring up the issue, but get shut down. Example: https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/5p6cyn/welcome_to_rcanada/ Edit: banned from /r/Canada for bringing this up.', ">>{BC-clette} : So when ISIS attacked Paris, that wasn't on the news because it didn't happen in the US? Shooter was an avid Trump fanatic. Doesn't matter where it happened.", ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : >i wouldn't go down that road if i were you.... christians have killed PLENTY of people, in the name of god! Try to keep it recent. If you have to reach back decades and centuries to find examples comparable to Orlando you're probably wrong.", ">>{Jodthyrox2} : The funny thing is that Milo Yourenotarealjournalist actually posted an article titled '[Donald Trump Just Overtook The Democrats On Gay Rights](http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/08/15/republicans-just-overtook-dems-gay-rights/)' on breitbart yesterday. Seriously. Tl;dr: Trump's Islamophobia will save the American LGBTQ community from evil Muslims. That's all. No mention of same sex marriage etc.", '>>{profstenny} : You know, when I speak with my gay friends about what issues matter to them as members of the LGBTQ community, the first thing that ALWAYS comes up is "if only we could have a good immigration policy, I\'d feel safe. There\'s totally no bigots in America anymore." 12d chess from Trump here... /s', ">>{MusicandWrestling} : That's not fair; he cares about Donald Trump. I'm told he is a person.", ">>{MusicandWrestling} : Boy there's a guy who's 15 minutes are juuuuust about up", '>>{mikehipp} : Depends on what you call very, very recent past. It has been LGBTTQQIAAP (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, ally, pansexual) for at least a decade and the very latest is LGBTQQIP2SAA (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, pansexual, 2 spirit, asexual, allies)', '>>{UnoriginalRhetoric} : In the last decade there have 18 domestic right wing terrorist attacks in the U.S, pretty split between white supremacist (who are Christians) and specifically Christian belief motivated acts (usually related to LGBT or abortion.) There have been 11 Islamic attacks in the U.S in the same time period. Until the night club attack by the single mentally ill man, the domestic terrorists had the higher body count too.', ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : >pretty split between white supremacist (who are Christians) They're motivated by white supremacy, not Christianity. You are aware of this and are being disingenuous. >specifically Christian belief motivated acts (usually related to LGBT or abortion.) In what way are anti-LGBT attacks and anti-abortion attacks comparable and why do you feel the need to lump them together? Is it that hard to admit you're wrong? You really need to say that anti-abortion attacks were secretly anti-LGBT too because Christians were involved. Holy shit this is repugnant. So what you're saying is no: you can't find a recent instance comparable to a Muslim slaughtering 53 gay people in an Orlando nightclub.", '>>{MrMadcap} : Terrorists don\'t? It just seems redundant to say "Radical ________ Terrorist".', '>>{UnoriginalRhetoric} : > In what way are anti-LGBT attacks and anti-abortion attacks comparable and why do you feel the need to lump them together? Because I was speaking about Christian terrorism in the U.S, and those were the two major categories that motivated attacks? Either they were attacking LGBT people, or attacking abortion clinics as the most common attacks. Was that too complicated for you? Christians have had more attacks, and killed more Americans in terrorist attacks than Muslims until the one mentally ill man fired into a gay night club in the last decade. Give them some time and they will catch back up again, they always have in the last ten years. I think we should deport the real common denominator. Right wing, social conserative, religious. That would wipe out 99% of domestic terrorism in the U.S you people are dangerous. Because in the U.S the vast majority of domestic terrorist attacks are either right wing christians or muslims, right wing white supremacists, and right wing anti-government. You people are just the actual worst.', '>>{druuconian} : This guy murdered someone, but Democrats are super mean to Republicans, so #bothsides amirite', ">>{mrslappydick} : A theory I've seen posted is that Trump and Co pushed this ban knowing it would get struck down so when something does happen he can blame it on the left.", ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : >Because I was speaking about Christian terrorism in the U.S, and those were the two major categories that motivated attacks? One far larger than the other so you combine them arbitrarily to give the illusion of not being incorrect. Which let me reaffirm: you are incorrect. >Christians have had more attacks, and killed more Americans in terrorist attacks than Muslims until the one mentally ill man fired into a gay night club in the last decade. There are also a lot more Christians than Muslims yet Muslims have the higher body count and worse attacks > Right wing, social conserative, religious. That would wipe out 99% of domestic terrorism in the U.S you people are dangerous. >IN THE US IN THE US IN THE US Are you seeing a pattern here? Muslims are a tiny minority and commit huge amounts of terrorism way outside of their % of the population. I believe you're aware how wrong you are and are being intentionally thick, hoping I'll get bored of replying to you eventually. You've succeeded, I'm tired of talking to you. Run along.", '>>{SuperGuyMan-} : >ban white Trump supporters I thought you where against banning people for there views/race. Pick a side.', ">>{yaosio} : Conspiracy nuts (Trump supporters) will say it was faked. They won't say the shooting never happened because they have more to gain by saying the shooter was a Muslim. Expect claims that either the person in custody is a Muslim, or the real shooter is on the loose.", ">>{Iamsuperimposed} : To be honest, I'm not even sure what the Q stands for. You would think queer,... but I would think it's covered with the LGBT part.", '>>{BedWedOrBehead} : Who tells you that, smart people? The best people?', '>>{nanopicofared} : hmmm -- imagine that, a christian terrorist shooting Muslims', ">>{DTanner} : Shocked and appalled at the mosque shooting just a few blocks from where I used to live in Sainte-Foy :( Not at all surprised the shooter was a pro-Trump, anti-feminist xenophobe. The last mass shooting in Quebec was of course the École Polytechnique massacre carried out by another Canadian-born right-winger. Proving once again you're infinitely more likely to be killed by a home-grown terrorist than any refugee. If anyone should be deported deported it's these white supremacists, preferably to the bottom of the ocean.", '>>{colefly} : Yes. He is a HUMAN person. Him and I. Both just ^^nooormal *huemaan* persons!!! Unlike *lizard* peoplessss, whom I know nothing about. Nobody likes lizard personsss, with their resonant flirgle chambers and their SUPERIOR INTELLECT!!', '>>{Mistborn_Jedi} : I believe I read Spicer referenced this attack as a good reason Trump implemented the Ban. Yeah ok buddy, and I thought I was taking the crazy pills.', ">>{Rd4three} : Well ain't that a bitch. Now we're gonna have to front the money for a northern border wall too. Too bad our neighbors can't get their shit together. Not our buddies, guys! SAD!", ">>{TRogow} : Why do you keep the conversation going if you're tired of it?", '>>{ratherlargepie} : You seem triggered. This title did its work on you.', '>>{TRogow} : Then the idiots use those examples as martyrs that dissenting opinions are banned.', ">>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Well, it's a good thing we can bring it up now. If the admin don't seem to care, neither do I. /r/Metacanada is radicalizing youth into becoming White Nationalists and it's time we spoke about it.", '>>{Caliph_Imam_Obama} : Look how much of a big deal trump supporters made over a guy getting kidnapped. It dominated the news for a week. Not a peep out of the donald over FIVE PEOPLE MURDERED though. Pure hypocrisy. Absolute garbage.', '>>{colefly} : I IDENTIFY AS A SPACE WOLF. ADD ME TO YOUR ALPHABET OR FEEL THE WRATH OF LEMAN RUSS! GSM makes so much more sense', '>>{tangibleadhd} : A second man [who had been held in custody](http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/01/30/quebec-canada-mosque-attack-terrorism/97233660/) was described as a witness and released Monday. He was first Mohamed Khadir... and then Mohammed Belkhadir. A mosque is attacked and someone named Mohammed is still labeled as a suspect.', ">>{UncleGriswold} : While Trump certainly helped get this ball rolling, it also bears mentioning that the ultra-xenophobic Parti Quebecois set things into motion with their attempts to have this signed into law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_Charter_of_Values When the Parti Quebecois initially introduced this proposed bill, random assaults on Muslims (physical and verbal) spiked. After the Liberals defeated the PQ by a landslide in the last provincial election, I thought that would be the last we'd see of the bill, but it seems its residual strength was more potent than we thought.", '>>{colefly} : I stay inside on sunny days, for I fear the lightning', ">>{RemoteViewingTrainee} : > if you're a white person that voted for Trump you're fucking garbage. As the lone Democrat voter in a far right Republican family, can confirm", ">>{Tarkmenistan} : That sub can do what they want, but I don't think it's right a mod of /r/Canada is also most of /r/metacanada where they routinely pick on Canada posters. The mod has taken part in the picking on users of /r/Canada on /r/metacanada", '>>{vertigo3pc} : Muslim shooter: "They\'re dangerous, we need to properly vet them before letting them in!" White shooter: "False flag! Fake news!"', ">>{UnoriginalRhetoric} : Waaah, stop pointing out Christian terrorists attacks, waaaaah. It's not faaaaair!", '>>{chlomyster} : I just saw some at Donald doing just that.', ">>{UncleGriswold} : They'll find a way to claim that reports of a white shooter are 'fake news'.", '>>{PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN} : How come every major MSM outlet isnt covering this 24/7?', '>>{CuntTheRouge} : Everyone who voted for Trump is garbage to some degree; whether white or not, whether total garbage or just slightly stupid and ignorant.', ">>{Steven_Sr} : Surely even they can't be that Un self aware. Have any of us not been banned from the Donald?", '>>{pseudolocus} : I was wondering how long before the Quebecois separatists reared their heads after the election tbh.', ">>{Sparkykc124} : I've banned them from my personal life already. I gave it a lot of thought and just can't be friends with a trump supporter.", ">>{TRogow} : I technically haven't, but I only rarely go there and never comment. But yeah, they really don't have self awareness.", ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : 70.6% of the US population is Christian, 1% of the US is Muslim. Yet Muslims have committed the greatest act of terrorism in US History (9/11), the greatest mass-shooting in US history, and the biggest anti-LGBT hate-crime in all of US history (Orlando). If you want me to buy your narrative that CHRISTIANS R JUST AS BAD LEL then you need to provide me contemporary evidence to support that narrative. Pointing out that Christian terrorism kinda exists doesn't do that.", '>>{DireStrike} : Its all these white people. If there was only some way we can keep an eye on them, make sure they are not causing any trouble for everyone else. We should concentrate them, like in a camp or something', ">>{kdog1147} : Are you seeing a pattern here? Muslims are a tiny minority and commit huge amounts of terrorism way outside of their % of the population. I thought you were just looking at attacks on gays but I guess that's only for Christian terror attacks right? The cognitive dissonance is amazing.", '>>{soliloquy_exposed} : Parti Québécois is generally not xenophobic though, that was just an episode.', '>>{orlanderlv} : He\'s going to go from "Radical White Nationalist Christian Terrorist" to "dat bitch Tyronne and Juan own" once he\'s in jail. He is going to get to know men of color, nationalities and religions very very well.', ">>{Lord_Blathoxi} : If you don't get the joke, you're already confused.", '>>{eohorp} : 1 extreme christian terrorist attack per week of the Trump presidency. #thinkofthewomenandchildren', ">>{bhlohk} : Oh look! It's one out in the wild! Quick, take a picture before it scurries away. Crikey, was a big one, eh?", '>>{TRogow} : I knew it. You\'re the type of person that when wrong in a conversation you choose to always try to get the last word to feel that you "won", it\'s pretty sad. Anywhoozles, just wanted to see if that was the case and I\'m good now. Have a nice day, tiger. (Go ahead and make another response to turn this into a "win" for you)', '>>{soliloquy_exposed} : Québécois like that a pretty much all non-practicing Catholics.', ">>{UncleGriswold} : Don't get me started. I could bomb this thread with links proving to the contrary. As in bigly.", '>>{Chino1130} : If it was 63 days after the attack, would you have said "9 week anniversary"?', ">>{BVLLSHlT} : He's said openly he doesn't actually care about the equality part of the LGBT movement. He's a piece of work I'll say that much, he's either off his fucking rocker or touching on a decent point, there's no in betwe**e**n", '>>{hellomondays} : You sound triggered. Why does it bother you so much?', '>>{KazakiLion} : Something like "GSM" for Gender and Sexual Minorities would be more accurate, but LGBT has the name recognition at this point. Most people have give up on the alphabet soup approach, but feel there\'s a decent argument to be made for sticking the catch all "Queer" Q on the end.', '>>{UncleGriswold} : The hardcore are finding ways to steer the blame back to the victims.', ">>{ekiemeno} : lol I enjoyed this comment. It's what I was thinking before read this.", ">>{kanst} : I think the Q was actually added to try to stop the expansion. By having Queer or Questioning in there, it could kind of be a catch all for anyone whose sexual identity didn't fit neatly into a term. They are trying to be inclusive, and considering there is strange discrimination between groups within the LGBTQ community it makes sense.", '>>{ekiemeno} : I just got banned in the Donald a few hours ago for saying: "If only more people like you were in this sub instead of meme stars and biased followers" In response to a small conversation with a reasonable trump supporter. I got called a shill and then banned. I don\'t even like Hillary. I just dislike Trump more.', '>>{Seanis} : doubt it, they\'ll just do the same thing they did with sandy hook, "it was a false flag."', ">>{Bentekes_Space_Pants} : Why do Trump supporters even care about terrorism? If there's a terrorist attack, they're not going to target your trailer park. You're safe. It's all those urban liberals you hate who have genuine cause for concern.", ">>{co2_emitter} : I thought Hillary had Omar Mateen's father as her VIP at a rally..", '>>{MeinKampfyCar} : Virtually nobody in the LGBT community will use those though. The only ones that are used regularly are LGBT and LGBTQ. Sometimes LGBTQIA. Literally nobody uses the full acryonym.', ">>{ComradeOfSwadia} : Why won't President Trump say *radical white supremacist terrorism*?", '>>{K33pMeHangin0n} : It\'s not a "Trump ban" it\'s a ban of people from countries, like Canada, where there are terrorists who believe in a dangerous ideology, Radical White Supremacy.', ">>{ExecuSpeak} : It's a fantastic one. Sure, a ton of people want to crap on trump here, however it's the ones that were created 19 hours ago, 10 days ago etc. when you look at their post history and it's all r/politics and trump hate that make you wonder. Plus, why should anyone argue about anything here? Has anyone's politics been changed through online argument?", ">>{JimHeidecker} : Don't strain your brain jumping through those mental hoops.", ">>{CarmineFields} : It's about empathy. You don't plan a hate party at the city and anniversary of an attack. Republicans freaked out over a mosque blocks away from the twin towers. Have some bloody respect", '>>{DrMussintouchit} : Hillary Clinton took millions from Saudis who KILL GAYS and LESBIANS??? But lets talk about Trump though.', ">>{natmccoy} : It's like they're no longer just confused about what's true, they actively pursue the opposite of reality. It's like the folks at /r/conspiracy, as soon as one of their conspiracy theories seem true suddenly the opposite is the conspiracy.", ">>{MrMadcap} : Or perhaps it just wasn't a particularly good joke.", '>>{democralypse} : Q is meant to be a catch all for everything that would be too long to include - it stands for queer or questioning.', '>>{democralypse} : Q isn\'t just used by "hardcore liberals" pretending anything. Q is meant to be a catch all for everything that would be too long to include - it stands for queer or questioning.', ">>{reddit_on_reddit1st} : Lol, your side's ongoing two minutes hate is what got us here.", '>>{Splax77} : Yes, we need a complete and total shutdown of white Christians entering this country until our leaders figure out what the hell is going on.', ">>{CJShort} : Why doesn't TD recognize that a white man killed Brown people? Because it doesn't fit their narrative?", ">>{democralypse} : There's other aspects of sexuality not covered by LGBT. Q is meant to be a catch all for everything that would be too long to include - it stands for queer or questioning.", ">>{Lord_Blathoxi} : It's not a joke. That's the sad part.", '>>{Carcaju} : You forgot Dawson College shooting in 2006. There was "only" one person killed, but the attacker was planning a mass shooting.', ">>{soliloquy_exposed} : Oh yeah, you're gonna rehash the same 5 words Parizeau said once to prove me the second most important party in my society is profoundly racist? For most of its history, the PQ has had a civil nationalism core. Polls from the Levesque era make that very clear. Only recently had a more populist base been louder.", ">>{democralypse} : Q is meant to be a catch all for everything that would be too long to include - it stands for queer or questioning. It's been around for awhile but LGBT is still the standard", '>>{UncleGriswold} : A shower of xenophobic evidence would of course include Parizeau\'s legendary. You might just want to crawl back inside of Le Devoir\'s ass and find solace for your "Quebec pour les Quebecois" echo chamber there.', ">>{TrueBlueMichiganMan} : The Orlando shooter's father was at a Hillary rally... She has again and again expressed her support for traditional marriage (until it became politically convenient not to)... She supports her rapist husband...", ">>{shadowofahelicopter} : Um the guy said trump is plenty offensive and repugnant on his own. He's not a trump supporter. You can correct someone without being a trump supporter...", '>>{PineappleSmoothie} : It\'s a simple fix for a large problem. Higher gun control. We already issue background checks (for the most part), we should also issue mental health checks. This does not take away anyone\'s rights. You start talking about gun control and republicans start panicking about right to bare arms and stuff. Anyone who is not a felon, over 18, and isn\'t completely mentally insane will have no problems at all obtaining a firearm. All I am talking about is making those that shouldn\'t have them, take extra steps. By simple fix I mean it\'s a simple idea. Implementation is much harder than that, I know. I live in Virginia right now. I like in Rural Virginia right now. I live within 5 miles of 10 gun stores right now. Today is Monday, I could get a firearm by this time Tuesday if I had the cash for it and it would be 100% legal. If there was a gunshow going on right now I wouldn\'t even need cash for it. It\'s mind boggling. So many people have no problems with this. Hell, some countries don\'t even allow their policemen to carry firearms yet joe average over here can get fully automatics with enough cash. This is dangerous to say, but I don\'t think people will start listening until someone really important is assassinated. A couple white Christians have to assassinate a whole bunch of country singers and republican officials. Things like this don\'t do anything. All the bigots of the country just go "who cares, it\'s just a couple Muslims, no biggie" or the shooter is a Muslim and they go "see? that\'s why we need to kick them out!"', '>>{HerMileHighness} : Weird. So are you supporting a complete ban on any Muslims coming in until we figure out what\'s going on? And this guy "liked" atheism on Facebook, so block all atheists as well?', ">>{Galle_} : Trump actually *is* a human. Clinton is the lizard person. They let one human run in this election to show why we're so much better off with the lizards.", '>>{Sekh765} : If we add you though we are going to have to add the Thousand Sons too and noone wants that', ">>{SuperGuyMan-} : I guess I just don't get it. Is it some kind of joke?", '>>{HerMileHighness} : Brother, they are seriously hating right now! My own hands hurt from the handwringing.', ">>{SuperGuyMan-} : Why don't liberal subreddits recognize the hundreds of terrorist attacks in Muslim countries by Muslim extremists each year? Look, I'm not saying that liberal subreddits are more guilty of this, but that most political subreddits are. Don't try to act like liberals aren't guilty of this too. Everyone is.", ">>{playitleo} : If it's politically convenient to support marriage equality, then why is trump against it. His position ignores how the American people feel and it's founded in bigotry", ">>{dxtboxer} : I said *or* people pretending to be inclusive and progressive. And also *semi*-hardcore liberals. Idk, I never add the Q, LGBT covers what it needs to. By definition someone questioning their sexuality wouldn't be part of the community until they come to terms with the result of that questioning.", ">>{democralypse} : It does not cover all different recognized sexualities across the spectrum such as pansexual, asexual, etc. So queer has become a catchall, but it's not seen as politically incorrect to leave it out. That's just categorically not true. The Q for questioning is explicitly included so that those questioning are safely welcomed in the community.", '>>{UnoriginalRhetoric} : Well, we had to redefine terrorism to make most of the acts fit. The 18 Christian attacks tend to be organized and pre-meditated as apart of a group, actual terrorism. A number of the attacks by Islamic people were lone gun men with no affiliation or any support and a host of mental health issues. Before, an act of terrorism was something committed by an organized group with specific political goals. But we had to redefine that to anyone who commits a crime who was potentially inspired by an existing terrorist organization to ensure we could label a lone gun man shooting gay people because he was crazy, a terrorist despite having no political demands or affiliation.', ">>{robomonkey94} : I donno, I was high, I think I need to create a throw away account for when I'm high. Half the time I don't understand it when I wake up.....", '>>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : What the fuck is a "2 spirit"?', ">>{mikehipp} : Though? Though what? I wasn't advocating for anything, I was answering a question.", '>>{mikehipp} : Two-spirited or "two-spirit" usually indicates a Native person who feels their body simultaneously manifests both a masculine and a feminine spirit, or a different balance of masculine and feminine characteristics than usually seen in masculine men and feminine women.', '>>{Byzantine279} : We really need to not use the abbreviation HRC this election.', '>>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : All this identity politics bullshit is getting way too confusing to keep track of.', ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : >They're just lone gunmen, there's no wider correlation! https://fas.org/irp/threat/nctc2011.pdf >A single sect of Islam is responsible for 70% of terrorist deaths world wide."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{sikeston} : The White House’s strangely strong denial that its ‘deportation force’ idea is back', '>>{knox3} : Heaven forbid they strongly deny a leak that makes them look like buffoons.', ">>{Cayde-187} : Aren't lies just denials by another name? For this administration, anyway...", '>>{wraithtek} : Well it\'s pretty clear that Trump\'s deportation force is in full effect, even if they *don\'t* call in the National Guard as that document suggests they might. They\'re deporting immigrants protected under DACA, and those who have been law abiding/complying with immigration officials. They can\'t pretend they\'re only rounding up the "bad hombres" Trump so often mentions.', '>>{FlyingSquid} : We strongly deny it will be 10,000 troops! It will be twice that at least!', ">>{dongazine_supplies} : Look, I am not a Trump supporter, but this is dumb, and just undermining the media's credibility. You guys want this big flashy story so you're over-reaching for it when it's not actually there. And in the meantime there is plenty of stuff to talk about that's actually real, like ICE hitting courtrooms and battered womens' shelters. Calm down, stop being in a race to break the Big Story that will finally prove Trump is Hitler, and start showing some judgment and restraint about what is actually newsworthy.", '>>{jk2007} : So once again - Spicey is caught lying. Jesus, it just never ends. >The White House quickly denied it, with press secretary Sean Spicer saying it\'s "100 percent not true. It is false. It is irresponsible to be saying this.”', '>>{SNStains} : Skepticism is a good thing, but AP claims the memo is authentic.', '>>{dongazine_supplies} : Right the memo is real, but the idea was discarded at a fairly early / low level of planning.', '>>{SNStains} : Reassuring if true. Your source on this is Spicer? Not dissing you, just noting that these people are liars.', ">>{dongazine_supplies} : The DHS. > these people are liars If you can't see any gradiations in credibility between Kelly and Matthis and Priebus and Spicer and Trump then I think you're going to have a hard time making sense of things.", ">>{SNStains} : I'm a little at a loss as why we should be expected to discern degrees of mendaciousness, or even accept conflicting messages. I mean the root of the problem is obvious, Trump doesn't really know what he's doing and doesn't seem to worry about it much. If getting worked up compels them to get their shit together how is that a bad thing? It seems evident that public outrage (protest, etc.) does prompt them to *try* and land on a consistent message, whether it's acceptable or not. If you're worried about people losing steam, I wouldn't. It looks like things are just beginning to heat up.", '>>{dongazine_supplies} : My worry is what rhetorical position does the mainstream media need to take to drop Trump\'s approval through its "floor". The current approach isn\'t going to do it, not by a long shot.', ">>{SNStains} : It's not their job to drop Trump's ratings, he'll do that to himself. They just need to keep trying to get the truth out there *sans* bullshit. The truth isn't good for Trump; his ideas are generally terrible, ham-fisted responses to sometimes invented problems. The fascinating thing is watching how things are starting to evolve. Some have decided that having Kellyanne on is actually a waste of time. She's directly using up airtime and lines of print with lies. These lies then in turn need to be dealt with, using additional time and resources. Now it's two days later. Putting out this draft memo may be a better approach. It's real...it's out-of-date apparently, but it's real. And it prompted a quick, strong response. No mirk. No wasted time."], ['>>{KorgRue} : White Trump Supporter charged with murder in mosque killing. Time to ban white trump supporters.', '>>{bbiggs32} : Radical White Nationalist Terrorism. Edit: Radical Christian White Nationalist Terrorism Thanks for the tip.', '>>{Scoutandabout} : Until we figure out what the hell is going on...', '>>{HansEmbiid} : I hope to see you (and all Trump supporters) defending mainstream Muslims now. Unless you believe that Trumpism is inherently an ideology of hate and violence.', '>>{HerMileHighness} : Ban them from what, OP? I mean, the guy also was an atheist and a Katy Perry fan. Should we ban them, too?', '>>{IWasRightOnce} : Crazy how not a single news outlet is talking about this It would be everywhere if the shooter had turned out to be Muslim', ">>{DebussySIMiami} : Surprised the All Lives Matters crowd isn't out protesting for this guy.", '>>{dolphins3} : Say it with me now: radical Christian terrorism.', '>>{James-Delaney} : >guy also was an atheist and a Katy Perry fan probably', '>>{XHF} : I wish more people hear about who the shooter was. There are so many people on social media right now blaming Muslim refugees for the attack and blaming Justin Trudeau for letting it happen.', '>>{beermile} : Everyone knows *actual* terrorists are of the absolute most sound mind possible!', ">>{KorgRue} : I know not all. It was a snark meant to call attention to the failings of this Executive Order. I don't really think we should start banning Trump supporters.", ">>{fakebooze} : I thought my sarcasm was evident with the yadda yaddah yaddah. I'll delete.", '>>{simxc} : Just to keep the nation safe! We have to defend ourselves from Radical White Terrorism.', '>>{KorgRue} : It is snark to call attention to the failings of this EO. Not meant to be taken literally my friend.', ">>{Sadsackashit} : No no, it's me. I've had a few beers 😊", ">>{sakipooh} : Thanks Trump for inspiring your god damn fanatic base. The sad part is that I'm sure there are a lot more of them out there just waiting to impress the orange Hitler.", ">>{freshwordsalad} : Unfortunately, it also means the title doesn't match.", ">>{IWasRightOnce} : This happened like an hour away from the US border. Obviously there is some level of difference having happened in Canada, but I don't buy for a second that that's all that's happening here I'm not saying it needs to dominate the news cycles but I have had the news on for the last 1.5 hours and it hasn't been mentioned once", '>>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Folks at /r/Metacanada are pretty quiet on this given one of their like-minded fanboys did this.', '>>{sweggelo} : You have to say the words RADICAL WHITE NATIONALIST!', ">>{VROF} : I really don't have much faith that the Trump administration has a staff real skilled at figuring things out.", '>>{_Apophis} : Welcome to Trump\'s "United America" Unfortunately this doesn\'t surprise me. Just head on over to Breitbart and read the comments. Noting but outright racism, bigotry, and isolationists. It\'s a circlejerk of terrified people, just sad.', '>>{Stoaks} : How can Trump defeat Radical Christian Terrorism if he won\'t even say the term "Radical Christian Terrorism"?', ">>{NebraskaGunGrabber} : I've concluded we need to ban all immigration from nations with white nationalist parties. This is based on the number of terror attacks in North American since Trump came into office. Sorry Farage but you've got to go.", '>>{II-III-V-VII-XI} : And Fox News still has not removed their "Suspect in Quebec Mosque terror attack was of Moroccan origin, reports show" tweet. The tweet is 7 hours old. No doubt perpetuating the bullshit that the Killer is "Moroccan Muslim" thus feeding into Trump\'s using it as an example for the need of the ban.', '>>{veniceinperil} : So, the Republican voting rolls need to be heavily vetted and restricted from air travel. Time to lock them up at the airport.', '>>{Annihilicious} : Good. They will look fucking ridiculous in a matter of days.', '>>{Tarkmenistan} : They are actually claiming it was false flag, soros/Clinton, etc. Also Rebel Media is using it to spead fake news are asking for donations. https://therebel.nationbuilder.com/quebec-terror-donation', ">>{NotFooledbyFools} : I watched their 6 pm news and I didn't even see them talk about the shooting at all. (my computer did freeze up for a few minutes so I could have missed it) You can imagine the outrage if it was a Muslim that shot up a church though. It'd be 24/7.", '>>{_Apophis} : The dude who was missidentified is a reasonable level headed human. > "Don\'t want to post his name in my comment", 29, an engineering student originally from Morocco, said he was giving his friend first aid when he spotted someone with a weapon and fled to the mosque\'s parking lot, not realizing the person he saw was a cop. >"They saw me flee, they thought I was suspicious, that\'s normal," he told La Presse. " For them, someone who flees is a suspect."', ">>{geekwonk} : Yeah this definitely won't fall out of the MSM narrative now that it doesn't fit the predefined storyline.", '>>{GillBatesWindows10} : White man here. More afraid of a white man with a gun doing me in than I will ever be of a refugee.', ">>{apexidiot} : Just gotta get it on Morning Joe. It's the only way he'll see it.", ">>{MrMadcap} : Are we sure it's the radical kind? Not just the normal kind?", ">>{veniceinperil} : See, here's the thing about that. I suspect most Americans, or at least a reasonable majority--60-70%--are not actually racist. Trump is uniting Americans against White Nationalists and *him*.", ">>{SALON_SOLDIER} : Even fucking Vice is calling these white Trump supporting terrorists out. Is banning white Trump supporters an option we can take? Seriously, if you're a white person that voted for Trump you're fucking garbage.", '>>{2fortwell} : Not an atheist. He thought Donald Trump was God.', ">>{DonutsMcKenzie} : Trump probably hasn't even figured out how to adjust the height on his chair in the oval office yet...", ">>{II-III-V-VII-XI} : Absolutely. It'd be the top story with contributors claiming this is the reason the ban is required and the protesters are anti national security.", ">>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : I'm now getting accused by /u/Medym who mods both /r/Metacanada and /r/Canada -- banning people for speaking out against neo-nazi metacanadians. That subreddit is a toxic shithole that is part of the problem when discussing the radicalization of Canadian youth. They are radicalizing lonely white Canadians who then commit these acts of terrorism. This is what happened to skinheads in the 1970s.", '>>{omeow} : >You have to say the words RADICAL WHITE NATIONALIST! Also say : Steve Bannon IS ONE OF THEM!!!!!!!!', '>>{_Apophis} : Yea I would agree, at the least I hope they begin to see how their rhetoric can move unstable people to do terrible things.', ">>{SALON_SOLDIER} : Here that white people? That's the sound of your time coming to an end. [It's over.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wb55teb1gJ0)", '>>{Tarkmenistan} : I have brought up the issues before but /u/medym and /u/lucky75 will activly shut down any post where you talk about it on /r/Canada. The Alt-right is moding /r/Canada I have asked several time to bring up the issue, but get shut down. Example: https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/5p6cyn/welcome_to_rcanada/ Edit: banned from /r/Canada for bringing this up.', ">>{BC-clette} : So when ISIS attacked Paris, that wasn't on the news because it didn't happen in the US? Shooter was an avid Trump fanatic. Doesn't matter where it happened.", '>>{MrMadcap} : Terrorists don\'t? It just seems redundant to say "Radical ________ Terrorist".', '>>{druuconian} : This guy murdered someone, but Democrats are super mean to Republicans, so #bothsides amirite', ">>{mrslappydick} : A theory I've seen posted is that Trump and Co pushed this ban knowing it would get struck down so when something does happen he can blame it on the left.", '>>{SuperGuyMan-} : >ban white Trump supporters I thought you where against banning people for there views/race. Pick a side.', ">>{yaosio} : Conspiracy nuts (Trump supporters) will say it was faked. They won't say the shooting never happened because they have more to gain by saying the shooter was a Muslim. Expect claims that either the person in custody is a Muslim, or the real shooter is on the loose.", '>>{nanopicofared} : hmmm -- imagine that, a christian terrorist shooting Muslims', ">>{DTanner} : Shocked and appalled at the mosque shooting just a few blocks from where I used to live in Sainte-Foy :( Not at all surprised the shooter was a pro-Trump, anti-feminist xenophobe. The last mass shooting in Quebec was of course the École Polytechnique massacre carried out by another Canadian-born right-winger. Proving once again you're infinitely more likely to be killed by a home-grown terrorist than any refugee. If anyone should be deported deported it's these white supremacists, preferably to the bottom of the ocean.", '>>{Mistborn_Jedi} : I believe I read Spicer referenced this attack as a good reason Trump implemented the Ban. Yeah ok buddy, and I thought I was taking the crazy pills.', ">>{Rd4three} : Well ain't that a bitch. Now we're gonna have to front the money for a northern border wall too. Too bad our neighbors can't get their shit together. Not our buddies, guys! SAD!", '>>{ratherlargepie} : You seem triggered. This title did its work on you.', ">>{Tenacious_Ceeee} : Well, it's a good thing we can bring it up now. If the admin don't seem to care, neither do I. /r/Metacanada is radicalizing youth into becoming White Nationalists and it's time we spoke about it.", '>>{Caliph_Imam_Obama} : Look how much of a big deal trump supporters made over a guy getting kidnapped. It dominated the news for a week. Not a peep out of the donald over FIVE PEOPLE MURDERED though. Pure hypocrisy. Absolute garbage.', '>>{tangibleadhd} : A second man [who had been held in custody](http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/01/30/quebec-canada-mosque-attack-terrorism/97233660/) was described as a witness and released Monday. He was first Mohamed Khadir... and then Mohammed Belkhadir. A mosque is attacked and someone named Mohammed is still labeled as a suspect.', ">>{UncleGriswold} : While Trump certainly helped get this ball rolling, it also bears mentioning that the ultra-xenophobic Parti Quebecois set things into motion with their attempts to have this signed into law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_Charter_of_Values When the Parti Quebecois initially introduced this proposed bill, random assaults on Muslims (physical and verbal) spiked. After the Liberals defeated the PQ by a landslide in the last provincial election, I thought that would be the last we'd see of the bill, but it seems its residual strength was more potent than we thought.", ">>{RemoteViewingTrainee} : > if you're a white person that voted for Trump you're fucking garbage. As the lone Democrat voter in a far right Republican family, can confirm", ">>{Tarkmenistan} : That sub can do what they want, but I don't think it's right a mod of /r/Canada is also most of /r/metacanada where they routinely pick on Canada posters. The mod has taken part in the picking on users of /r/Canada on /r/metacanada", '>>{vertigo3pc} : Muslim shooter: "They\'re dangerous, we need to properly vet them before letting them in!" White shooter: "False flag! Fake news!"', '>>{chlomyster} : I just saw some at Donald doing just that.', ">>{UncleGriswold} : They'll find a way to claim that reports of a white shooter are 'fake news'.", '>>{PM_ME_ANYTHING_FUN} : How come every major MSM outlet isnt covering this 24/7?', '>>{CuntTheRouge} : Everyone who voted for Trump is garbage to some degree; whether white or not, whether total garbage or just slightly stupid and ignorant.', '>>{pseudolocus} : I was wondering how long before the Quebecois separatists reared their heads after the election tbh.', ">>{Sparkykc124} : I've banned them from my personal life already. I gave it a lot of thought and just can't be friends with a trump supporter.", '>>{DireStrike} : Its all these white people. If there was only some way we can keep an eye on them, make sure they are not causing any trouble for everyone else. We should concentrate them, like in a camp or something', '>>{soliloquy_exposed} : Parti Québécois is generally not xenophobic though, that was just an episode.', '>>{orlanderlv} : He\'s going to go from "Radical White Nationalist Christian Terrorist" to "dat bitch Tyronne and Juan own" once he\'s in jail. He is going to get to know men of color, nationalities and religions very very well.', ">>{Lord_Blathoxi} : If you don't get the joke, you're already confused.", '>>{eohorp} : 1 extreme christian terrorist attack per week of the Trump presidency. #thinkofthewomenandchildren', '>>{soliloquy_exposed} : Québécois like that a pretty much all non-practicing Catholics.', ">>{UncleGriswold} : Don't get me started. I could bomb this thread with links proving to the contrary. As in bigly.", '>>{UncleGriswold} : The hardcore are finding ways to steer the blame back to the victims.', '>>{Seanis} : doubt it, they\'ll just do the same thing they did with sandy hook, "it was a false flag."', ">>{Bentekes_Space_Pants} : Why do Trump supporters even care about terrorism? If there's a terrorist attack, they're not going to target your trailer park. You're safe. It's all those urban liberals you hate who have genuine cause for concern.", ">>{ComradeOfSwadia} : Why won't President Trump say *radical white supremacist terrorism*?", '>>{K33pMeHangin0n} : It\'s not a "Trump ban" it\'s a ban of people from countries, like Canada, where there are terrorists who believe in a dangerous ideology, Radical White Supremacy.', ">>{natmccoy} : It's like they're no longer just confused about what's true, they actively pursue the opposite of reality. It's like the folks at /r/conspiracy, as soon as one of their conspiracy theories seem true suddenly the opposite is the conspiracy.", ">>{MrMadcap} : Or perhaps it just wasn't a particularly good joke.", ">>{reddit_on_reddit1st} : Lol, your side's ongoing two minutes hate is what got us here.", '>>{Splax77} : Yes, we need a complete and total shutdown of white Christians entering this country until our leaders figure out what the hell is going on.', ">>{CJShort} : Why doesn't TD recognize that a white man killed Brown people? Because it doesn't fit their narrative?", ">>{Lord_Blathoxi} : It's not a joke. That's the sad part.", '>>{Carcaju} : You forgot Dawson College shooting in 2006. There was "only" one person killed, but the attacker was planning a mass shooting.', ">>{soliloquy_exposed} : Oh yeah, you're gonna rehash the same 5 words Parizeau said once to prove me the second most important party in my society is profoundly racist? For most of its history, the PQ has had a civil nationalism core. Polls from the Levesque era make that very clear. Only recently had a more populist base been louder.", '>>{UncleGriswold} : A shower of xenophobic evidence would of course include Parizeau\'s legendary. You might just want to crawl back inside of Le Devoir\'s ass and find solace for your "Quebec pour les Quebecois" echo chamber there.', '>>{PineappleSmoothie} : It\'s a simple fix for a large problem. Higher gun control. We already issue background checks (for the most part), we should also issue mental health checks. This does not take away anyone\'s rights. You start talking about gun control and republicans start panicking about right to bare arms and stuff. Anyone who is not a felon, over 18, and isn\'t completely mentally insane will have no problems at all obtaining a firearm. All I am talking about is making those that shouldn\'t have them, take extra steps. By simple fix I mean it\'s a simple idea. Implementation is much harder than that, I know. I live in Virginia right now. I like in Rural Virginia right now. I live within 5 miles of 10 gun stores right now. Today is Monday, I could get a firearm by this time Tuesday if I had the cash for it and it would be 100% legal. If there was a gunshow going on right now I wouldn\'t even need cash for it. It\'s mind boggling. So many people have no problems with this. Hell, some countries don\'t even allow their policemen to carry firearms yet joe average over here can get fully automatics with enough cash. This is dangerous to say, but I don\'t think people will start listening until someone really important is assassinated. A couple white Christians have to assassinate a whole bunch of country singers and republican officials. Things like this don\'t do anything. All the bigots of the country just go "who cares, it\'s just a couple Muslims, no biggie" or the shooter is a Muslim and they go "see? that\'s why we need to kick them out!"', '>>{HerMileHighness} : Weird. So are you supporting a complete ban on any Muslims coming in until we figure out what\'s going on? And this guy "liked" atheism on Facebook, so block all atheists as well?', ">>{SuperGuyMan-} : I guess I just don't get it. Is it some kind of joke?", '>>{HerMileHighness} : Brother, they are seriously hating right now! My own hands hurt from the handwringing.', ">>{SuperGuyMan-} : Why don't liberal subreddits recognize the hundreds of terrorist attacks in Muslim countries by Muslim extremists each year? Look, I'm not saying that liberal subreddits are more guilty of this, but that most political subreddits are. Don't try to act like liberals aren't guilty of this too. Everyone is."], ['>>{space-elevator} : Trump hypocrisy on display days after campaigning with anti-LGBTQ activists in Orlando', '>>{space-elevator} : Chad Griffin, president of HRC, today made the following statement responding to Donald Trump’s “foreign policy” speech: “The same Donald Trump who today railed against ISIS hate stood shoulder-to-shoulder with anti-LGBTQ activists five days ago in Orlando, just miles from Pulse nightclub," said HRC President Chad Griffin. "This is the same Donald Trump whose campaign manager is in the headlines today for allegedly taking millions from allies of one of the world\'s worst anti-LGBTQ dictators, and who has campaigned on promises of more anti-LGBTQ Supreme Court justices. This is also the same Donald Trump who put Mike Pence, one of the most prominent faces of discrimination in America today, on the ticket. Meanwhile, we don\'t have to guess at how Hillary Clinton will advance LGBTQ equality on a global stage -- because that\'s exactly what she did as Secretary of State. Long before Donald Trump struggled to read the letters \'LGBTQ\' off a teleprompter, Secretary Clinton went before the international community to declare that "gay rights are human rights," launched the Global Equality Fund, and pioneered the first-ever UN resolution protecting LGBTQ people.” On the two-month anniversary of the Pulse nightclub shooting last week, which took the lives of 49 LGBTQ people and allies, Trump courted anti-LGBTQ activists just 10 miles from the site of the tragedy in Orlando. Among the organizations attending was Liberty Counsel, which supports and defends archaic laws criminalizing homosexuality with harsh punishments around the world, and has condemned President Obama and the U.S. government for speaking out against such laws, saying, “America should not be trying to make that country act in an immoral way.” In 2011, Liberty Counsel Chairman Mat Staver said that American opposition to the criminalization of homosexuality is “immoral.” He said, “More than sixty countries have laws criminalizing homosexuality and virtually every country in the world has laws that criminalize pedophilia and child incest. Malawi was doing what it was doing in its own best interest and America should not be trying to make that country act in an immoral way.” In 2013, Staver said that Russia was “reaffirming marriage….and rejecting this radicalized Homosexual agenda.” Liberty Counsel’s Matt Barber went further in 2014, praising Russia, by saying it was trying to, “...stop this homosexual activist propaganda from corrupting children in our nation, and we need to see that right here in the United States.’” Trump has also doubled down on his anti-LGBTQ agenda by putting Indiana Gov. Mike Pence on the ticket. Pence became a national disgrace in 2015, for his “license to discriminate” bill that could have allowed businesses to deny service to LGBTQ people -- and for subsequently defending the bill after an outcry from the business community and a majority of Hoosier voters. In a now notorious interview with ABC last year, Pence refused to answer eight separate times when asked whether businesses should be able to discriminate against LGBTQ people. In recent weeks, Trump has also campaigned alongside Tony Perkins -- leader of the Family Research Council, which has been designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.', ">>{CaulkusAurelis} : Well, it's not like he WROTE the article.... or...", ">>{CaulkusAurelis} : at this point, I'd be willing to lay some serious coin that DT would ENGAGE in some of these activities, if it would save his bid", '>>{throwawatc123} : Right? I\'m surprised they didn\'t have a "God hates f*gs" rally across the street from Pulse afterwards.', ">>{CompactedConscience} : Trump supporters have given up on substantive arguments and have resorted to pointing out the age of people's accounts.", '>>{Average_Autist} : Account is only 9 days old, still has bigger hands than Trump.', '>>{Isstvan82} : 9 is a good number, for a NAMBLA supporter like Trump.', '>>{tangibleadhd} : >Trump has also doubled down on his anti-LGBTQ agenda by putting Indiana Gov. Mike Pence on the ticket. Pence became a national disgrace in 2015, for his “license to discriminate” bill that could have allowed businesses to deny service to LGBTQ people -- and for subsequently defending the bill after an outcry from the business community and a majority of Hoosier voters. In a now notorious interview with ABC last year, Pence refused to answer eight separate times when asked whether businesses should be able to discriminate against LGBTQ people.', ">>{Cyanity} : You know a presidential candidate is bad when their attending of an anti-LGBT gathering two months after the Pulse nightclub shooting isn't even the worst thing he's done all week. Trump is the gift that keeps on giving.", '>>{uhmmaybe} : Interesting fun fact. So what are you trying to say?', '>>{PresidentChaos} : Fun Fact! Trump opened his Orlando campaign office right across the street from the Pulse Nightclub crime scene.', '>>{smoochmybumper} : These so called anti-LGBTQ activists are nothing compared to radical Islamists that Hillary wants to import en masse.', '>>{Scoutster13} : Tacky but who is surprised? This was not an accident.', '>>{Scoutster13} : Oh please - these folks would love to throw some gay people off a roof - how the hell do you live lying like that to yourself?', ">>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : So it's kind of off topic, but when the fuck did we start adding a Q to it. It used to just be LGBT not too long ago?", '>>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : So this may be a bit off topic, but when the fuck did they add a "Q" to the end of the acronym? If memory serves, it was just LGBT in the very, very recent past, was it not?', ">>{dxtboxer} : The most inclusive one these days is LGBTQIA I believe. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual. As someone in the 'G' category, I still just say LGBT. The Q is usually added by sorta hardcore liberals and people like Trump who are pretending to be inclusive and progressive by using the longer form. EDIT: can the people who are down voting me explain why instead of just hitting the button and moving on?", ">>{Pylons} : I've also heard some wanting to change it to GSRM (Gender, Sexual, and Romantic Minorities).", ">>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : So I'm probably not going to severely offend anyone if I simply continue using the traditional LGBT acronym?", '>>{smaIl_talk} : Probably not, but I would at least add the Q as queer has come to mean just outside of the normative spectrum. I also like how it sounds better with the Q at the end lol', '>>{Kaprak} : You should be fine, hell I know very opinionated LGBT people who don\'t think the "A" belongs there. If you upset someone for using the shorthand they\'re probably looking for a reason.', ">>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : >If you upset someone for using the shorthand they're probably looking for a reason. Well, you don't get to be a grad student in political science without pissing a few people off along the way.", '>>{Victor_Zsasz} : So just across the street from the night club then? Or was the crime scene somewhere else?', ">>{bryce7878} : It's normally just written LGBT but sometimes they add a q or an a to stand for questioning or asexual respectively. I prefer GSM for gender and sexual minorities because the alphabet soup thing gets a bit ridiculous sometimes.", ">>{mm365886} : He just met with 2 preists. They arent outright anti lgbt activists. Misleading title is misleading Edit: I understand i'm wrong but will not remove this post.", ">>{bryce7878} : If I had to choose between keeping my right to marry who I want and not be thrown out of my job or apartment for marrying them taken away by Trump supreme court nominees vs having the 0.00000002% chance of me being attacked by a radical Muslim downgraded to a 0.00000001% chance I think I'll choose the first one.", '>>{esreveReverse} : That\'s over a quarter of the alphabet. At what point can we just use "ABC"?', '>>{Steven_Sr} : Report them. Account age notes and shill accusations are now bannable offenses.', '>>{NapoleonBonerparts} : But God really does hate figs. He killed that fig tree for like no reason in the bible.', ">>{robomonkey94} : Can we find a simpler name for lgbtq, it seems to keep growing..... Lgbtqrstuvwxyz, now I know my abc next time I'll identify gender correctly...", '>>{______5} : > Among the organizations attending was Liberty Counsel, which supports and defends archaic laws criminalizing homosexuality with harsh punishments around the world, and has condemned President Obama and the U.S. government for speaking out against such laws, saying, “America should not be trying to make that country act in an immoral way.” Lying redditor is full of shit.', '>>{CarmineFields} : It\'s about using just the tiniest speck of empathy. It\'s the same thing with holding it in Orlando. Why does the anti-gay "Christian" right need to be inconsiderate jackasses?', ">>{Human_FaintingGoat} : I think they just meant it's only been two months so Trump at the VERY least should have considered the optics of how fresh the shooting is still in the public's minds.", '>>{pillsneedlespowders} : I tend to just use queer honestly, which is a habit I picked up off of a bi friend of mine. It annoys a few people, but not many in my experience. Hell, just look at the bisexual cheer. "Here\'s to beers and queers and big brassieres!"', ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : So guilt by association. No thanks. Christians didn't shoot up the nightclub a Muslim did.", ">>{mr_charliejacobs} : i wouldn't go down that road if i were you.... christians have killed PLENTY of people, in the name of god! and i'm sure next time there is something floating about the internets, floated by the far right, about how Obama or Clinton associated with this person or that horrible group or person, you'll come to their aid and complain that one shouldn't be found guilty by association -- you know, just to be fair.", ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : >i wouldn't go down that road if i were you.... christians have killed PLENTY of people, in the name of god! Try to keep it recent. If you have to reach back decades and centuries to find examples comparable to Orlando you're probably wrong.", ">>{Jodthyrox2} : The funny thing is that Milo Yourenotarealjournalist actually posted an article titled '[Donald Trump Just Overtook The Democrats On Gay Rights](http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/08/15/republicans-just-overtook-dems-gay-rights/)' on breitbart yesterday. Seriously. Tl;dr: Trump's Islamophobia will save the American LGBTQ community from evil Muslims. That's all. No mention of same sex marriage etc.", '>>{profstenny} : You know, when I speak with my gay friends about what issues matter to them as members of the LGBTQ community, the first thing that ALWAYS comes up is "if only we could have a good immigration policy, I\'d feel safe. There\'s totally no bigots in America anymore." 12d chess from Trump here... /s', ">>{MusicandWrestling} : That's not fair; he cares about Donald Trump. I'm told he is a person.", ">>{MusicandWrestling} : Boy there's a guy who's 15 minutes are juuuuust about up", '>>{mikehipp} : Depends on what you call very, very recent past. It has been LGBTTQQIAAP (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, ally, pansexual) for at least a decade and the very latest is LGBTQQIP2SAA (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, pansexual, 2 spirit, asexual, allies)', '>>{UnoriginalRhetoric} : In the last decade there have 18 domestic right wing terrorist attacks in the U.S, pretty split between white supremacist (who are Christians) and specifically Christian belief motivated acts (usually related to LGBT or abortion.) There have been 11 Islamic attacks in the U.S in the same time period. Until the night club attack by the single mentally ill man, the domestic terrorists had the higher body count too.', ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : >pretty split between white supremacist (who are Christians) They're motivated by white supremacy, not Christianity. You are aware of this and are being disingenuous. >specifically Christian belief motivated acts (usually related to LGBT or abortion.) In what way are anti-LGBT attacks and anti-abortion attacks comparable and why do you feel the need to lump them together? Is it that hard to admit you're wrong? You really need to say that anti-abortion attacks were secretly anti-LGBT too because Christians were involved. Holy shit this is repugnant. So what you're saying is no: you can't find a recent instance comparable to a Muslim slaughtering 53 gay people in an Orlando nightclub.", '>>{UnoriginalRhetoric} : > In what way are anti-LGBT attacks and anti-abortion attacks comparable and why do you feel the need to lump them together? Because I was speaking about Christian terrorism in the U.S, and those were the two major categories that motivated attacks? Either they were attacking LGBT people, or attacking abortion clinics as the most common attacks. Was that too complicated for you? Christians have had more attacks, and killed more Americans in terrorist attacks than Muslims until the one mentally ill man fired into a gay night club in the last decade. Give them some time and they will catch back up again, they always have in the last ten years. I think we should deport the real common denominator. Right wing, social conserative, religious. That would wipe out 99% of domestic terrorism in the U.S you people are dangerous. Because in the U.S the vast majority of domestic terrorist attacks are either right wing christians or muslims, right wing white supremacists, and right wing anti-government. You people are just the actual worst.', ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : >Because I was speaking about Christian terrorism in the U.S, and those were the two major categories that motivated attacks? One far larger than the other so you combine them arbitrarily to give the illusion of not being incorrect. Which let me reaffirm: you are incorrect. >Christians have had more attacks, and killed more Americans in terrorist attacks than Muslims until the one mentally ill man fired into a gay night club in the last decade. There are also a lot more Christians than Muslims yet Muslims have the higher body count and worse attacks > Right wing, social conserative, religious. That would wipe out 99% of domestic terrorism in the U.S you people are dangerous. >IN THE US IN THE US IN THE US Are you seeing a pattern here? Muslims are a tiny minority and commit huge amounts of terrorism way outside of their % of the population. I believe you're aware how wrong you are and are being intentionally thick, hoping I'll get bored of replying to you eventually. You've succeeded, I'm tired of talking to you. Run along.", ">>{Iamsuperimposed} : To be honest, I'm not even sure what the Q stands for. You would think queer,... but I would think it's covered with the LGBT part.", '>>{BedWedOrBehead} : Who tells you that, smart people? The best people?', '>>{colefly} : Yes. He is a HUMAN person. Him and I. Both just ^^nooormal *huemaan* persons!!! Unlike *lizard* peoplessss, whom I know nothing about. Nobody likes lizard personsss, with their resonant flirgle chambers and their SUPERIOR INTELLECT!!', ">>{TRogow} : Why do you keep the conversation going if you're tired of it?", '>>{TRogow} : Then the idiots use those examples as martyrs that dissenting opinions are banned.', '>>{colefly} : I IDENTIFY AS A SPACE WOLF. ADD ME TO YOUR ALPHABET OR FEEL THE WRATH OF LEMAN RUSS! GSM makes so much more sense', '>>{colefly} : I stay inside on sunny days, for I fear the lightning', ">>{UnoriginalRhetoric} : Waaah, stop pointing out Christian terrorists attacks, waaaaah. It's not faaaaair!", ">>{Steven_Sr} : Surely even they can't be that Un self aware. Have any of us not been banned from the Donald?", ">>{TRogow} : I technically haven't, but I only rarely go there and never comment. But yeah, they really don't have self awareness.", ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : 70.6% of the US population is Christian, 1% of the US is Muslim. Yet Muslims have committed the greatest act of terrorism in US History (9/11), the greatest mass-shooting in US history, and the biggest anti-LGBT hate-crime in all of US history (Orlando). If you want me to buy your narrative that CHRISTIANS R JUST AS BAD LEL then you need to provide me contemporary evidence to support that narrative. Pointing out that Christian terrorism kinda exists doesn't do that.", ">>{kdog1147} : Are you seeing a pattern here? Muslims are a tiny minority and commit huge amounts of terrorism way outside of their % of the population. I thought you were just looking at attacks on gays but I guess that's only for Christian terror attacks right? The cognitive dissonance is amazing.", ">>{bhlohk} : Oh look! It's one out in the wild! Quick, take a picture before it scurries away. Crikey, was a big one, eh?", '>>{TRogow} : I knew it. You\'re the type of person that when wrong in a conversation you choose to always try to get the last word to feel that you "won", it\'s pretty sad. Anywhoozles, just wanted to see if that was the case and I\'m good now. Have a nice day, tiger. (Go ahead and make another response to turn this into a "win" for you)', '>>{Chino1130} : If it was 63 days after the attack, would you have said "9 week anniversary"?', ">>{BVLLSHlT} : He's said openly he doesn't actually care about the equality part of the LGBT movement. He's a piece of work I'll say that much, he's either off his fucking rocker or touching on a decent point, there's no in betwe**e**n", '>>{hellomondays} : You sound triggered. Why does it bother you so much?', '>>{KazakiLion} : Something like "GSM" for Gender and Sexual Minorities would be more accurate, but LGBT has the name recognition at this point. Most people have give up on the alphabet soup approach, but feel there\'s a decent argument to be made for sticking the catch all "Queer" Q on the end.', ">>{ekiemeno} : lol I enjoyed this comment. It's what I was thinking before read this.", ">>{kanst} : I think the Q was actually added to try to stop the expansion. By having Queer or Questioning in there, it could kind of be a catch all for anyone whose sexual identity didn't fit neatly into a term. They are trying to be inclusive, and considering there is strange discrimination between groups within the LGBTQ community it makes sense.", '>>{ekiemeno} : I just got banned in the Donald a few hours ago for saying: "If only more people like you were in this sub instead of meme stars and biased followers" In response to a small conversation with a reasonable trump supporter. I got called a shill and then banned. I don\'t even like Hillary. I just dislike Trump more.', ">>{co2_emitter} : I thought Hillary had Omar Mateen's father as her VIP at a rally..", '>>{MeinKampfyCar} : Virtually nobody in the LGBT community will use those though. The only ones that are used regularly are LGBT and LGBTQ. Sometimes LGBTQIA. Literally nobody uses the full acryonym.', ">>{ExecuSpeak} : It's a fantastic one. Sure, a ton of people want to crap on trump here, however it's the ones that were created 19 hours ago, 10 days ago etc. when you look at their post history and it's all r/politics and trump hate that make you wonder. Plus, why should anyone argue about anything here? Has anyone's politics been changed through online argument?", ">>{JimHeidecker} : Don't strain your brain jumping through those mental hoops.", ">>{CarmineFields} : It's about empathy. You don't plan a hate party at the city and anniversary of an attack. Republicans freaked out over a mosque blocks away from the twin towers. Have some bloody respect", '>>{DrMussintouchit} : Hillary Clinton took millions from Saudis who KILL GAYS and LESBIANS??? But lets talk about Trump though.', '>>{democralypse} : Q is meant to be a catch all for everything that would be too long to include - it stands for queer or questioning.', '>>{democralypse} : Q isn\'t just used by "hardcore liberals" pretending anything. Q is meant to be a catch all for everything that would be too long to include - it stands for queer or questioning.', ">>{democralypse} : There's other aspects of sexuality not covered by LGBT. Q is meant to be a catch all for everything that would be too long to include - it stands for queer or questioning.", ">>{democralypse} : Q is meant to be a catch all for everything that would be too long to include - it stands for queer or questioning. It's been around for awhile but LGBT is still the standard", ">>{TrueBlueMichiganMan} : The Orlando shooter's father was at a Hillary rally... She has again and again expressed her support for traditional marriage (until it became politically convenient not to)... She supports her rapist husband...", ">>{shadowofahelicopter} : Um the guy said trump is plenty offensive and repugnant on his own. He's not a trump supporter. You can correct someone without being a trump supporter...", ">>{Galle_} : Trump actually *is* a human. Clinton is the lizard person. They let one human run in this election to show why we're so much better off with the lizards.", '>>{Sekh765} : If we add you though we are going to have to add the Thousand Sons too and noone wants that', ">>{playitleo} : If it's politically convenient to support marriage equality, then why is trump against it. His position ignores how the American people feel and it's founded in bigotry", ">>{dxtboxer} : I said *or* people pretending to be inclusive and progressive. And also *semi*-hardcore liberals. Idk, I never add the Q, LGBT covers what it needs to. By definition someone questioning their sexuality wouldn't be part of the community until they come to terms with the result of that questioning.", ">>{democralypse} : It does not cover all different recognized sexualities across the spectrum such as pansexual, asexual, etc. So queer has become a catchall, but it's not seen as politically incorrect to leave it out. That's just categorically not true. The Q for questioning is explicitly included so that those questioning are safely welcomed in the community.", '>>{UnoriginalRhetoric} : Well, we had to redefine terrorism to make most of the acts fit. The 18 Christian attacks tend to be organized and pre-meditated as apart of a group, actual terrorism. A number of the attacks by Islamic people were lone gun men with no affiliation or any support and a host of mental health issues. Before, an act of terrorism was something committed by an organized group with specific political goals. But we had to redefine that to anyone who commits a crime who was potentially inspired by an existing terrorist organization to ensure we could label a lone gun man shooting gay people because he was crazy, a terrorist despite having no political demands or affiliation.', ">>{robomonkey94} : I donno, I was high, I think I need to create a throw away account for when I'm high. Half the time I don't understand it when I wake up.....", '>>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : What the fuck is a "2 spirit"?', ">>{mikehipp} : Though? Though what? I wasn't advocating for anything, I was answering a question.", '>>{mikehipp} : Two-spirited or "two-spirit" usually indicates a Native person who feels their body simultaneously manifests both a masculine and a feminine spirit, or a different balance of masculine and feminine characteristics than usually seen in masculine men and feminine women.', '>>{Byzantine279} : We really need to not use the abbreviation HRC this election.', '>>{Im_Not_A_Socialist} : All this identity politics bullshit is getting way too confusing to keep track of.', ">>{Erotic_Pigeons} : >They're just lone gunmen, there's no wider correlation! https://fas.org/irp/threat/nctc2011.pdf >A single sect of Islam is responsible for 70% of terrorist deaths world wide."], [">>{whatsinaname1212} : Trump's rallies give a boost to president and his supporters", '>>{whatsinaname1212} : He is building momentum again folks, analysts are saying this is the type of wave that washed him into the White House folks!! This is amazing', ">>{GeriatriCroc} : So refreshing to see a President that doesn't lose touch with his boss, the PEOPLE.", ">>{TimRigginsPanther} : Works well to keep his base of worshippers happy, but it makes him look like a joke to those who don't already support him.", '>>{TheSocialDynamicist} : He is certainly picking up speed in his plunge to the bottom.', '>>{data2dave} : I think Obama should have done this and it would have been much more polished. Remember the disaster of 2010? Obama pretty much holed up while his ACA rolled out and he tried to appease Republicans with cuts to Social Security and did little to rally supporters. I always see him with nose in the air, beautiful but vague speech and limp hands flopping. We Democrats need FDR back again or Bernie Sanders (younger version) not more appeasers like Obama. 2010 was his worse year. Passed ACA but lost the Congressional midterms in a massive overthrow. But Trump is a dangerous conman selling out America. Keep up the Rally\'s dude so the opposition can come and show who is really the "people".', '>>{whatsinaname1212} : Calling Obama an appeaser is silly at best. The Donbama was the best thing to happen to the dems in a very long time. It will be a while before they get a politician like him again. Do you know how many presidents tried to get something like ACA done and failed? Maybe you should look it up.', '>>{data2dave} : Heritage Care or Romney Care. I don\'t like Rahm but he was correct-- Obama needed to focus on Bettering the Economy, not Healthcare. No public option, no reduced provider extortion costs. And betrayal of the Primary voters who were told "no mandate". Instead O could have broke up the big banks, put a few in jail, rallied with the Occupy movement, given no quarter to the Republicans-- these moves are how FDR united the nation and led to a huge Democratic majority. Obama I realize was attacked by racists but they are not a majority. He then could have pushed through higher taxes to bring broadband for all (rural America), and major infrastructure improvements. ProWall Street lawyer Eric Holder didn\'t do any favors either. Ignore the skin color, look at the elitist pretensions. Obama has an adorable family but I always wished Michelle could have punched out a few Republicans on camera (figuratively). She seemed to have more of the spirit that was needed!', '>>{whatsinaname1212} : > Obama needed to focus on Bettering the Economy Where you in asleep or in a coma in the last 5 years of the Bush era? Do you remember what the economy was like?', '>>{data2dave} : Sounding like a condescending Clintonista. Yea. Bernacki, Nanci and Paulson did the Bailout prior to Obama\'s election. That stopped the crash then Obama asked for a woefully small stimulus package that didn\'t do those "shovel ready projects". But he did call the Market bottom and told us to buy stocks. Thus next to Calvin Coolidge he had the biggest bullrun. But did it help poor blacks (and whites)? Nada! Wealthy people did great under Obama. The slow, slow recovery for Main Street while Wall Street boomed is the real story of the last 8 years .,. And thus Trump. The worse result of Obama\'s years.']]

classify and reply

['>>{Archlicht} : Anyone who supports Trump has the intelligence of a 13-year-old idiot, regardless of sexual orientation.', '>>{Trumpicana} : Did you watch her speech when she literally played the woman card? Did she even mention 1 issue men are facing today like high suicide rates or falling way behind in college and wages for under 30 men? 70% of college grads are women and they make 10% more for the same work if under 30. Young Men have alot of issues people are ignoring and its why trump is rising.', '>>{foolfools} : No, feminism is for all genders, including men. I would think white men would want even playing fields and honest competition to "make america great".', ">>{ablurdumur} : If the Bus tour she and Kaine are currently undertaking in Pennsylvania and Ohio is any indication, I'd say no.", ">>{CatTrump} : That's homophobic . ABC needs to release an apology and fire the reporter. We will not stand for hate.", '>>{awake-at-dawn} : U.N. officials denounce ‘inhuman’ treatment of Native American pipeline protesters', ">>{ImRickStevesBitch} : That's terrible... his 14th birthday was at least a month ago. Don't you remember, ABC? Chuck E Cheese? Milo got a switchblade comb, a throwing star, and a pack of those candy cigarettes. His mom was so mad!", ">>{EggbroHam} : He's like the kid that spoils Mock Trial for everyone.", '>>{roflcopter1005} : Can the UN just come in and forcibly remove all republicans and ship them to Antarctica?', ">>{Tiny-Hands_Donny} : Do they not realize there's already a pipeline in that area?", ">>{_scubasteve} : If feminism is for men included, why aren't they protesting the absurd amount of rape in men's prisons? More men are sexually assaulted in the US than women. EDIT: switched rape with sexual assault.", '>>{thought2158} : Just Facts: As Many Americans Have Criminal Records As College Diplomas!', '>>{thought2158} : The number of Americans with a criminal history has risen sharply over the past three decades. Today, nearly one-third of the adult working age population has a criminal record. In fact, so many Americans have a criminal record that counting them all is nearly impossible.', '>>{kokes88} : lol liberals say they are the ones who are accepting of all people.... except if you have a different view point fuck those people', '>>{Astronom3r} : [Statistically, in the Land of the Free, you have the fewest free people.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjeq3NYUw2M) - Jim Jeffries', '>>{Piglet86} : Did you even read the article or watch the video its talking about?', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Of course not. Why would he do that?', ">>{PantsMcGillicuddy} : If your view point contains things like not allowing equal rights for all people, not allowing a woman's right to choose, religious discrimination, and Christian Sharia law....yeah, you can fuck off with your different views. Edit:. Appreciate the gold! I suggest donating it to groups that will help these causes in the future though", '>>{foolfools} : >More men are raped in the US than women. Cite? Maybe they are know the entire prison industrial complex is a clusterfuck, why deal with only one aspect of it?', '>>{TheIcePalace} : So does this mean the majority of Americans have neither? I am both gladdened and saddened by that.', ">>{aledlewis} : That's discrimination against idiots. Equality for idiots now.", '>>{Hitchling} : False equivalence. Love JJ though saw him a few months back live, one of the best going.', '>>{ablurdumur} : While Prison rape is a seriously underreported issue, the charge that men are raped more than women is provably false.', ">>{mrbarky} : We have 5% of the world's population, but 25% of the world's prison inmates. Land of the Free.", '>>{hearthneewb} : Yes the media is bias towards having a close race. It sucks because Trump has had enough gaffs to sink any real politician at this point.', '>>{RockyFlintstone} : Herr Piece should be tweeting any time now that the UN is a washed up bunch of losers.', '>>{kokes88} : so no religious discrimination except for the ones that are against homosexuality, abortions, and the ones that treat women as second class citizens? because that pretty much sums up a lot of the major religions', '>>{Rollakud} : Trump Supporter Defense: "What about black on black crime?"', '>>{Mister_Positive_} : I do not know anyone with a college diploma. Not sure which school you went to that issued a Diploma after your (at least) 4 year ride.... get a refund... you should have received a degree.', '>>{Dargaro} : Just one reason to keep religion out of government.', ">>{Whiskeyonice} : The UN that stood by in Rwanda calls the US treatment of NA inhuman? The UN is a corrupt cess pool. It's a joke of an organization. Hopefully our new US ambassador points this out to them.", ">>{Grumpy_Cunt} : Some day the alt-right will turn on Milo. For the LULZ. He's built an army that have no ideology beyond simple sadism - does it hurt people's feelings? - then they'll do it. They don't _really_ hate black people - but racism is shocking so they do it. They don't _really_ hate jews - but antisemitism is shocking so they do it. They don't really hate gay people - but... and Milo can't even see it coming. But as long as it's just words then there has to be a limit to how much attention we pay to these kids. Attention is, after all, the source of whatever tiny power they have.", '>>{mrbarky} : So do we. Along with other human rights stalwarts like Russia, China and Saudi Arabia.', '>>{Cthulhuplusaccount} : They kill more of their own people than we do, it messes up the prison inmate vs. world population ratio.', ">>{beehive4} : Wow ABC is blatant in its bias. They aren't even trying to hide it anymore.", '>>{MaximumEffort433} : I wonder what the "Law and Order" ~~candidate~~ President is going to say on the matter. Oh yeah: "Stop it." Seriously though, I fear that peaceful protest is at serious risk in this nation. Donald Trump is giving the New York Times shit for reporting *facts,* what the fuck is he going to do when thousands of people get together to express their *opinions.* Donald Trump is a big fan of the 1st Amendment right up until it\'s used to say something he doesn\'t like, and we just gave him command of the army.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : > 70% of college grads are women and they make 10% more for the same work if under 30. Source?', '>>{preemptivebanana} : Am I suppose to know who Milo Yiannopoulos is?', '>>{Whiskeyonice} : Please. Democrats have lots of experience putting Americans into internment camps.', ">>{thought2158} : I don't believe the article addresses Black-on-Black Crime (let me check---hold please). Eh...no it doesn't.", '>>{ravichar} : There is a significant difference of environmental impact of leaking natural gas compared to crude oil. The Northern Border Pipeline is for natural gas.', ">>{Balkinsman} : (interesting comment, i wonder who's he talking too?)", ">>{Trumpicana} : http://www.nber.org/digest/jan07/w12139.html http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/women-now-33-more-likely-men-earn-college-degrees Women have out paced men in college degree's since the 70's. Boys in k-12 have fallen so far behind women its not even funny.", ">>{Trigger_Me_Harder} : > Did she even mention 1 issue men are facing today like high suicide rates or falling way behind in college and wages for under 30 men? Yes. She went over both those issues. She has plans for mental health, wage stagnation and college debt. You should check out the convention, it's all covered.", '>>{trustmeiwouldntlie2u} : The diploma is the document showing that the degree was conferred.', '>>{Fargonian} : So...gun control advocates who either want different gun laws for cities vs the countryside, or who want to pass gun control laws in general that take away gun rights, can "fuck off" with their different views. Sounds great!', '>>{Trumpicana} : Its not though. More money wont solve this problem. Its starts in k-12 and the way we teach boys. Boys and girls learn differently and we have catered education to girls. We are now doing the same thing with our job markets. Its why manufacturing was shipped off in favor of white collar service sector jobs. We have been catering the entire country to women for 40 years. Its why the family structure is also falling apart now. The black community was hit the hardest by these changes especially black men. Social services and family law are much the same. Favor women over men.', ">>{gulfman78} : A lot of confusing people under this post. (Probably didn't get their degrees (sigh). :(", '>>{thought2158} : Hello exoendo. Oh...ok. Looks like i added a "!" at the end of the sentence. Hmm...', '>>{Plzbanmebrony} : Very true. The worse that could happen is the gas line explodes but that would have limited damage even. The crude could leak and get in the water supply or worse catch fire and pollute the area even more.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Thanks for the links! What is Trump going to do about this issue?', '>>{hearthneewb} : Yeah not even close to the amount of gaffs.', '>>{UvonTheTerrible} : Milo, in his own juvenile way, serves an important purpose. PC speech has gotten so far past the point of ridiculousness in our society it\'s becoming a real danger. The foolishness taking place on college campuses today regarding censorship of free speech and \'safe spaces\' is utterly ridiculous and needs to stop. These students are allegedly adults so they should be able to endure the horror of someone else\'s words without retreating to a \'safe space\' where everything is censored. In the real world they will have to confront far worse. Milo is simply calling attention to the absurdity of what\'s going on with our public discourse so for that he deserves credit. Everyone should close their eyes and recite "sticks and stones..." to themselves 10 times.', ">>{AlphaCygni} : I'm surprised they didn't do it after he scammed them with his white male scholarship.", '>>{BristolShambler} : No, by behaving like such a raving asshole all Milo does is convince the PC speech police that they are fighting the good fight. People like him are just the flipside of the bipartisan shitshow that public and online discourse is currently wallowing in.', ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Calling attention to the problem is useful. If Milo was not an 'asshole' then no one would know who he is and we wouldn't even be discussing the issue. It's not pretty, but it may be necessary. Seriously, I dread the day I have to send my kids off to college. It's that bad.", '>>{TheBlackMark} : While it is perfectly understandable to not recognize every name n politics, it is foolish to advertise that fact.', '>>{BristolShambler} : > Calling attention to the problem is useful. Not if you do it in a way that turns off half the people you are trying to convince', ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : > Social services and family law are much the same. Favor women over men. I agree with this 100%. I think it's horrible how hard it is for a man to win custody of a child. But what's wrong with the k-12 system? As in how is it catering to girls?", '>>{Trumpicana} : I watched my brother spend 40000 dollars to lose custody to a drug addict mother who had one of their kids die under her watch in nebraska. Family law is atrocious.', '>>{Trumpicana} : 90% of teachers are now female, they have cut recess and gym, they have punished boys for having more energy and changed courses so less competition happens between students. Women often dont understand boys if they dont have a son. Zero tolerance policies as well effect far more boys than girls. Boys are far different than girls and any parent who has one of each can tell you that.', ">>{Grumpy_Cunt} : I feel foolish for thinking that it hadn't already happened. Of course it had. How could it not?", ">>{Trauerkraus} : No. The reporter called him an idiot when Milo said that he'd call Leslie Jones a man to her face. That is why he got the response he did. And the reporter would be correct.", '>>{preemptivebanana} : After reading up on Milo Yiannopoulos, I think it would be foolish to spend anymore time on him than is necessary to make this statement.', '>>{theonlylawislove} : This is actually very accurate. He is literally a gay Catholic homophobe.', '>>{The_YoungWolf} : He tried to pander to the white nationalist/Neo-Nazi wing of the alt-right months ago and they metaphorically spat in his face. But the more "moderate" useful idiots like GamerGaters and "fiscally conservative social liberals" won\'t ever stop licking his boots. He validates them too much and is their only real outlet for publicity. There was even an incident over a year back where KiA started to doubt their faith in him because of an awful hit piece he wrote against a critic, and he responded by brazenly insulting them - they fell over each other begging for his foregiveness. Even now, after he\'s left GG behind and derides KiA specifically, that crowd still thinks he\'s the greatest dude. It\'s creepy. They\'re like abused housewives too scared to leave their man. EDIT: [The second incident in question](https://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3jps46/ethics_breitbart_pulls_a_gawker_publically_shames/cus15mi)', ">>{TheBlackMark} : That is quite understandable. He's a wretched human being.", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I agree with some of his points, the government should not make a profit on student loans and education should be comprehensive. But how does that translate to more men going to college?', '>>{Trumpicana} : There are other points in there that address that though he needs to do more. Colleges should be as close to 50-50 as possible.', ">>{HenryWCoveredInBees} : ABC news fights fire with fire, doesn't get all PC with Trumpster moron, right loses their minds.", ">>{HenryWCoveredInBees} : Were dealing with Milo, there isn't a very smart part of anything he does.", ">>{HenryWCoveredInBees} : Guess the reporter just wasn't being PC. Gonna have to get over it.", ">>{EggbroHam} : The answer to PC culture isn't to become completely uncivilized. If PC culture can be compared to the over use of antibacterial soap, causing increased troublesome bacterial resistance, Milo is solving the problem by wiping down the counters with his own feces.", '>>{teronert} : Ill give you a less bias answer. Political writer and pundit, hes controversial because of how he speaks about controversial issues. He has associated hinself with the alt right before and also works for Breitbart.', ">>{BadDecisionDino} : That's his secret. He already hates gay people. Dude is gay like S.E. Cupp is atheist.", '>>{Trumpicana} : How authoritarian of you. You are the reason both sides cant come together on certain issues. You rather poison the discourse than have a conversation.', '>>{Solario_ff14} : Oh please, conservatives have to stay in their carefully crafted safe spaces away from reality.', '>>{bodiaz6} : Was thinking the same thing. Cookies pandered out to every group except blue wm. She does have the union chief stumping for her & maybe she starts targeting the infrastructure spending plan more to blue wm.', '>>{singuslarity} : The Democratic party wrote them off long ago, leaving them to be taken for granted by the Republican party.', ">>{Solario_ff14} : When Holocaust survivors see the resemblance then it's time to take a long hard look at yourself.", '>>{johnfromberkeley} : What does the reporter have against 13 yr-old idiots?!', '>>{EltonBong} : He can be both. I disagree with him on like 90% of everything, but goddamn is it funny to watch him make radical feminists freak the fuck out.', '>>{Solario_ff14} : They have nothing on her so they have to resort to making things up to try and make it close.', ">>{Chuck419} : Competition is really important. It's what drives society.", ">>{Irishish} : >My rudeness creates conversation What a convenient cover for being a fucking asshole. Sellout to conservatives who quietly hate him thinks he's the next Mencken because he engages in 4chan tactics. I'm so goddamn sick of him.", '>>{Jake314159265359} : How do kids "compete" when it comes to learning?', '>>{Chuck419} : Tons of ways, art projects, science fairs, gym class, spelling bees, math bowls, speech competitions ext', '>>{Trumpicana} : KKK member because I want to see minorities doing better?', ">>{ABZR} : Mark Cuban should broadcast a message to Milo. >DM on Twitter and I'll get you set up with a real cushy media job", '>>{ShaneKaiGlenn} : I guarantee Milo cries himself to sleep every night. This kind of bully facade is usually created to cover up deep-seated insecurities and self-esteem issues.', ">>{Irishish} : Would you say the same thing about, say, Ann Coulter? Milo's a gayer, younger Coulter. He confuses trolling with valuable political conversation and hurting people with raising awareness.", '>>{prredlin} : Saw her in harrisburg last night. She was terrible as shit. Didnt address trade or economy once. It was a full shit on trump show.', '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : You know you are talking to the indoctrinated when they bring up the kkk as some kind of boogie man. Kkk has less than 5000 members nationwide. They havent been relevant since 1980.', ">>{Semper-Fido} : Except Trumps campaign and the Breitbart network is a walking safe space. Don't kid yourself that this is some new non-PC era of free speech that is being ushered in.", '>>{Religiomism} : >milo comes across as the one in the right. Feels before reals', ">>{S629A} : No she hasn't, but she doesn't need them. Trump could win white men by 60% (Obama lost them by a 2-1 margin) and still lose this election. My guess is that Trump wins them by between 40-50%. My projections for the election: White men- no college degree: Trump +45 White women- no college degree: Trump +15 White men- college degree: Trump +10 White women- college degree: Clinton +20 Whites total: Trump +14 Non-whites: Clinton +65 Final margin: Clinton +7", '>>{CatTrump} : And give views to a hate article? Get your hate speech out of Reddit', ">>{miked4o7} : Maybe it's because I'm in my mid 30's and live in adult world... but I don't get this whole thing about PC culture being some pandemic that has to dealt with as a national problem of some kind.", '>>{jschuch82} : SJW pc police are breeding an uncompetitive and lazy entitled generation and our country will suffer for it.', '>>{SWEETBRO} : the only people more childish than PC police are the people who never shut up about how much the PC police are "oppressing" them. the lot of you fools deserve each other.', ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > These students are allegedly adults so they should be able to endure the horror of someone else's words without retreating to a 'safe space' where everything is censored. In the real world they will have to confront far worse. Dude, you post in one of the biggest safe spaces on the internet, the_donald constantly. You clearly understand why safe spaces have some value. It seems like you only find safe spaces for people with views you disagree with objectionable.", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Actually I would post on r/Politics more frequently because I like arguing opinions, if it weren't for the reddit rules that limit you to 1 post every 10 minutes if you're in negative comment karma. It's a bit of a free speech killer.", ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > It's a bit of a free speech killer. So, you feel free speech entitles you to say whatever you like, wherever you like? Even if that wherever is private property?", ">>{TrumpCardStrategy} : What a joke, wouldn't be surprised if that sub is run by CTR seems like a parody.", '>>{TheyRedHot} : Steering the topic away or do you have a genuine comment on how PC culture is getting out of hand?', ">>{charlie_argument} : It's not. PC is a political boogyman trotted out by the right every 4 years because they're intellectually bankrupt and out of ideas; it's something simultaneously intangible and inarguable, and it's very effective at moving the Overton window in the direction of whomever is clutching their culture pearls and screaming the loudest at our lowest common denominator around election time.", ">>{Wurplewillow} : It's not PC culture it's the polarization of society and how criticism can be absolved due to echo chambers and safe spaces of ALL parties. That people believe they're entitled to everything when they're really entitled to nothing and due to this criticism is taken personally. This is not exclusive to Pc/SJW people. It's a real problem and no one wants to talk about it because it requires them to listen to criticism.", '>>{UvonTheTerrible} : Well, when that \'private property\' is a discussion forum who\'s purpose is for people to discuss things......yea. The point of r/Politics is to discuss politically relevant stories and the guidelines state "Vote based on quality, not opinion." Now we all know it doesn\'t work that way but I\'m an optimist so I keep trying.', '>>{fthrfesdwe} : Milo is just a troll similar to Ann Coulter and Trump. They just say stupid shit to piss people off. I wish people could stop feeding them.', '>>{TheEgregore} : It is definitely not a joke sub. Look at the alt right around the Internet. They echoe the exact same sentiments in the sub', '>>{daybreaker} : It\'s the irony of one of the pro-Milo people in here saying > Everyone should close their eyes and recite "sticks and stones..." to themselves 10 times. as a defense of Milo\'s words... hey. Maybe you guys should repeat that to *yourselves* when you hear "PC speech" that triggers you!', '>>{daybreaker} : Yep, its just the inverse PC speech. "I want to say whatever I want to be an asshole, and dont want to face any criticism over it"', '>>{daybreaker} : Yep. They hate PC, but need to be treated with kid gloves even moreso than the "PC" people they hate. Theyre so sensitive.', ">>{CouchRadish} : It isn't the PC speech that we don't like, it's a growing population of 20-somethings more willing to plug their eyes and ears to the horrors of the world (and God forbid, other opinions) for the sake of virtue signaling and whatnot.", '>>{daybreaker} : > , it\'s a growing population of 20-somethings more willing to plug their eyes and ears to the horrors of the world (and God forbid, other opinions) for the sake of virtue signaling and whatnot. As someone who has dealt with people complaining about "PC culture ruining America" for like 20 years now, that\'s a handy recent justification.', ">>{CouchRadish} : I'd poke my head into /r/politics more often if it actually covered politics instead of being another arm for CTR and Bernie-to-Clinton supporters to demonize Trump. There's not much discussion to be had here.", '>>{TheyRedHot} : I agree it\'s not exclusive to PC/SJW people but Milo hates censorship. I don\'t agree with everything he says but look at our media, look at our schools. Safe spaces everywhere. But the thing is radical SJW culture is poisonous. I\'m not talking about the right to call people n****rs and calling every Muslim a terrorist, that\'s not the damn point. That\'s disgusting and stupid. It\'s about how society is trying to make certain groups immune from all criticism. Fat feminists: lower the bar, don\'t criticize our health choices. Go heart disease! A terrorist attack: Definitely not radical Isl@m. (Avoiding the ban bot). Even on this damn website I could get banned for criticizing the negative aspects of Islam but not for saying "fuck Christianity, fucked up religion". I dare you to make a thread about the former and you will get banned.', '>>{jschuch82} : Sure. Perfect example is the university of Missouri. The president lost his job bc of a poop swastika and alleged racial slurs directed towards the student body president. Take a look at that schools enrollment numbers now. The University as a whole suffered for the actions of a few.', ">>{Wurplewillow} : I really don't understand how they can absolve themselves from criticism when they're being criticized", ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > Well, when that 'private property' is a discussion forum who's purpose is for people to discuss things......yea. So, should a part of your house where people tend to congregate like the living room or kitchen also be a free speech zone where anyone can say anything they want, any time they want? If a group of Jehovah's Witnesses knock on your door do you feel obligated to let them in to proselytize because of free speech?", '>>{TheGreatWolfRuss} : the only people that complain about "PC" culture are people not worth listening to. like milo', ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : If I invite a group of people into my house to discuss a particular topic then yea, I think there's an expectation that when they show up I'm going to let them speak.", '>>{CouchRadish} : It\'s a group of people more interested in emotional well being than physical. It\'s a group that tries to "rank" different groups of people (I believe it\'s called Oppression Olympics in some circles) and these rankings constantly switch around at the whim of sheltered 22 year olds. Take the Pulse nightclub shooting. 50+ people dead in a targeted shooting of a gay nightclub by an ISIS lone wolf. You think the SJW people would defend the gays, right? Wrong. They defended the Muslims, saying that calls to action were "Islamophobic".', ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > If I invite a group of people into my house to discuss a particular topic then yea Oh, so on **your** private property some limitations and rules for speech are ok? But not on other people's private property?", ">>{TrumpCardStrategy} : I mean just read the sidebar tho. Even if these guys are serious they are a joke. They sound like some angry Aspergers kids that are now in their mid 20's, still virgins, and only interact with the world through their computer screen. I wouldn't elevate these guys above what they really are just because they globbed on to the alt right label.", '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : I mean, I used to be have a lot of problems with people being overly politically correct because I thought it often encouraged people to avoid honest dialogue about the real issues. Now the right wing has moved the goalposts so much that they define being a civil human being as being "politically correct". Donald Trump mocks a disabled reporter with what Ann Coulter calls the "standard retard", and when he gets called out for being indecent, he just says he\'s not politically correct. The biggest irony is that calling someone "politically correct" is now a way to attempt to dismiss their argument with buzzwords, which is what these people that rant about politically correctness purport to be against.', '>>{charlie_argument} : Trump folks are really starting to lose their edge. Is it a low energy thing?', ">>{NeverDrumpf2016} : If you are against censorship, then you would support the right of private people and entities to call out Milo for his bullshit. Milo can say what he wants, but Twtter banning him is *their* way of exercising free speech against Milo. And this ABC reporter calling him an idiot is also a form of politically incorrect speech. This is my biggest problem with the anti-pc crowd, the hypocrisy. They aren't for free speech, they just don't want to face the consequences when other people are allowed to talk back to them.", '>>{TheEgregore} : Yes, this is literally what "alt-right" is', '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : Terrorism creates conversations too, so I guess that means Milo supports terrorism?', ">>{IAMA_LongHorse} : That's a straight up lie. They defended the gay community *and* said that blaming all Muslims was wrong.", ">>{NeverDrumpf2016} : I mean, he's biased, but it's not like you stumbled onto some great discovery, he wasn't attempting to hide his bias.", ">>{NeverDrumpf2016} : You're right, he wasn't trying to hide his bias, that's why pointing out his bias is foolish.", '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : Sorry the ABC reporter was to politically incorrect for you, I suggest finding a safe space.', '>>{beehive4} : Says a delusional leftist moron that has no idea what reality actually is.', ">>{SWEETBRO} : > They aren't for free speech, they just don't want to face the consequences when other people are allowed to talk back to them. that's exactly it. somehow in their minds being telling someone they're acting like a dick is worse than acting like a dick.", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Since you're not really making any sense at this point I think we'll have to stop things here.", ">>{someone447} : That's because anyone who isn't an insane, raving, racist, sexist lunatic doesn't support Trump. Donald Trump is a neo-fascist demagogue who is appealing to people's xenophobic tendencies. If that's what you want, more power to you. Just realize that sane people don't want a Mussolini-lite president of this country.", ">>{Irishish} : He makes decent people stare in contempt, he's not just triggering tumblr users or whatever the hell.", ">>{Irishish} : Gamergate? Honestly though I don't know. He claims he's standing up for free speech, but it seems like all that means is insulting feminists and writing cringey stuff on Breitbart. He thinks he's saying and doing something new and exciting, but I've been immersed in the same bullshit on 4chan for nearly 12 years. He's just louder and gayer, the alt-right's dancing gay monkey.", ">>{TheyRedHot} : Wrong. I definitely support the right of people to call Milo whatever they want. It's free speech. It's like the situation with Kaepernick. I think he has the right to sit down during the national anthem. He absolutely has the right. That doesn't mean I have to agree with his stupid, childish behavior. I'm not a hypocrite. I never said I am against criticism but of course, just call me out for something I never said. This is my biggest problem with the r/politics crowd, they are a bunch of condescending smart asses. And yes. Banning someone so they can't voice their opinions anymore is a great way of exercising free speech (it's not).", '>>{Irishish} : We defended both. We don\'t have to side with people on the right against millions of peaceful Muslims in order to condemn the actions of one. If you want to be mad at someone in the wake of the shooting, you can totally be mad at that one dumbass speaker on that one college campus who brought up BLM protests. or better yet, be angry at the Republicans who shot down anti-discrimination legislation mere days after the massacre happened. Don\'t be mad at SJWs for saying "we don\'t have to hate all Muslims in order to condemn this attack."', ">>{Irishish} : Insanely, some people believe they're mutually exclusive. If you say discrimination against Muslims is wrong you're clearly giving the OK to murderous homophobia.", '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : Then what again is your problem with political correctness? All political correctness does is criticize people who say certain things or act certain ways, but you just said you are fine with criticism.', '>>{Irishish} : You have now been banned from /r/conservative and /r/The_Donald', ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > Since you're not really making any sense This should be food for thought about how you view free speech.", '>>{Irishish} : >hes controversial because of how he speaks about controversial issues. But the thing is, "how he speaks" is trolling. Like, a step away from dismissing the BLM movement by saying maybe black people are just lazy criminal spooks, but then smirking and saying you\'re just joking, jeez, chill out black people. He offers nothing of value.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{thought2158} : Just Facts: As Many Americans Have Criminal Records As College Diplomas!', '>>{thought2158} : The number of Americans with a criminal history has risen sharply over the past three decades. Today, nearly one-third of the adult working age population has a criminal record. In fact, so many Americans have a criminal record that counting them all is nearly impossible.', '>>{Astronom3r} : [Statistically, in the Land of the Free, you have the fewest free people.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjeq3NYUw2M) - Jim Jeffries', '>>{TheIcePalace} : So does this mean the majority of Americans have neither? I am both gladdened and saddened by that.', '>>{Hitchling} : False equivalence. Love JJ though saw him a few months back live, one of the best going.', ">>{mrbarky} : We have 5% of the world's population, but 25% of the world's prison inmates. Land of the Free.", '>>{Rollakud} : Trump Supporter Defense: "What about black on black crime?"', '>>{Mister_Positive_} : I do not know anyone with a college diploma. Not sure which school you went to that issued a Diploma after your (at least) 4 year ride.... get a refund... you should have received a degree.', '>>{mrbarky} : So do we. Along with other human rights stalwarts like Russia, China and Saudi Arabia.', '>>{Cthulhuplusaccount} : They kill more of their own people than we do, it messes up the prison inmate vs. world population ratio.', ">>{thought2158} : I don't believe the article addresses Black-on-Black Crime (let me check---hold please). Eh...no it doesn't.", ">>{Balkinsman} : (interesting comment, i wonder who's he talking too?)", '>>{trustmeiwouldntlie2u} : The diploma is the document showing that the degree was conferred.', ">>{gulfman78} : A lot of confusing people under this post. (Probably didn't get their degrees (sigh). :(", '>>{thought2158} : Hello exoendo. Oh...ok. Looks like i added a "!" at the end of the sentence. Hmm...'], ['>>{awake-at-dawn} : U.N. officials denounce ‘inhuman’ treatment of Native American pipeline protesters', '>>{roflcopter1005} : Can the UN just come in and forcibly remove all republicans and ship them to Antarctica?', ">>{Tiny-Hands_Donny} : Do they not realize there's already a pipeline in that area?", '>>{kokes88} : lol liberals say they are the ones who are accepting of all people.... except if you have a different view point fuck those people', ">>{PantsMcGillicuddy} : If your view point contains things like not allowing equal rights for all people, not allowing a woman's right to choose, religious discrimination, and Christian Sharia law....yeah, you can fuck off with your different views. Edit:. Appreciate the gold! I suggest donating it to groups that will help these causes in the future though", '>>{RockyFlintstone} : Herr Piece should be tweeting any time now that the UN is a washed up bunch of losers.', '>>{kokes88} : so no religious discrimination except for the ones that are against homosexuality, abortions, and the ones that treat women as second class citizens? because that pretty much sums up a lot of the major religions', '>>{Dargaro} : Just one reason to keep religion out of government.', ">>{Whiskeyonice} : The UN that stood by in Rwanda calls the US treatment of NA inhuman? The UN is a corrupt cess pool. It's a joke of an organization. Hopefully our new US ambassador points this out to them.", '>>{MaximumEffort433} : I wonder what the "Law and Order" ~~candidate~~ President is going to say on the matter. Oh yeah: "Stop it." Seriously though, I fear that peaceful protest is at serious risk in this nation. Donald Trump is giving the New York Times shit for reporting *facts,* what the fuck is he going to do when thousands of people get together to express their *opinions.* Donald Trump is a big fan of the 1st Amendment right up until it\'s used to say something he doesn\'t like, and we just gave him command of the army.', '>>{Whiskeyonice} : Please. Democrats have lots of experience putting Americans into internment camps.', '>>{ravichar} : There is a significant difference of environmental impact of leaking natural gas compared to crude oil. The Northern Border Pipeline is for natural gas.', '>>{Fargonian} : So...gun control advocates who either want different gun laws for cities vs the countryside, or who want to pass gun control laws in general that take away gun rights, can "fuck off" with their different views. Sounds great!', '>>{Plzbanmebrony} : Very true. The worse that could happen is the gas line explodes but that would have limited damage even. The crude could leak and get in the water supply or worse catch fire and pollute the area even more.'], ['>>{Archlicht} : Anyone who supports Trump has the intelligence of a 13-year-old idiot, regardless of sexual orientation.', ">>{CatTrump} : That's homophobic . ABC needs to release an apology and fire the reporter. We will not stand for hate.", ">>{ImRickStevesBitch} : That's terrible... his 14th birthday was at least a month ago. Don't you remember, ABC? Chuck E Cheese? Milo got a switchblade comb, a throwing star, and a pack of those candy cigarettes. His mom was so mad!", ">>{EggbroHam} : He's like the kid that spoils Mock Trial for everyone.", '>>{Piglet86} : Did you even read the article or watch the video its talking about?', '>>{Mister_Jay_Peg} : Of course not. Why would he do that?', ">>{aledlewis} : That's discrimination against idiots. Equality for idiots now.", '>>{hearthneewb} : Yes the media is bias towards having a close race. It sucks because Trump has had enough gaffs to sink any real politician at this point.', ">>{Grumpy_Cunt} : Some day the alt-right will turn on Milo. For the LULZ. He's built an army that have no ideology beyond simple sadism - does it hurt people's feelings? - then they'll do it. They don't _really_ hate black people - but racism is shocking so they do it. They don't _really_ hate jews - but antisemitism is shocking so they do it. They don't really hate gay people - but... and Milo can't even see it coming. But as long as it's just words then there has to be a limit to how much attention we pay to these kids. Attention is, after all, the source of whatever tiny power they have.", ">>{beehive4} : Wow ABC is blatant in its bias. They aren't even trying to hide it anymore.", '>>{preemptivebanana} : Am I suppose to know who Milo Yiannopoulos is?', '>>{hearthneewb} : Yeah not even close to the amount of gaffs.', '>>{UvonTheTerrible} : Milo, in his own juvenile way, serves an important purpose. PC speech has gotten so far past the point of ridiculousness in our society it\'s becoming a real danger. The foolishness taking place on college campuses today regarding censorship of free speech and \'safe spaces\' is utterly ridiculous and needs to stop. These students are allegedly adults so they should be able to endure the horror of someone else\'s words without retreating to a \'safe space\' where everything is censored. In the real world they will have to confront far worse. Milo is simply calling attention to the absurdity of what\'s going on with our public discourse so for that he deserves credit. Everyone should close their eyes and recite "sticks and stones..." to themselves 10 times.', ">>{AlphaCygni} : I'm surprised they didn't do it after he scammed them with his white male scholarship.", '>>{BristolShambler} : No, by behaving like such a raving asshole all Milo does is convince the PC speech police that they are fighting the good fight. People like him are just the flipside of the bipartisan shitshow that public and online discourse is currently wallowing in.', ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Calling attention to the problem is useful. If Milo was not an 'asshole' then no one would know who he is and we wouldn't even be discussing the issue. It's not pretty, but it may be necessary. Seriously, I dread the day I have to send my kids off to college. It's that bad.", '>>{TheBlackMark} : While it is perfectly understandable to not recognize every name n politics, it is foolish to advertise that fact.', '>>{BristolShambler} : > Calling attention to the problem is useful. Not if you do it in a way that turns off half the people you are trying to convince', ">>{Grumpy_Cunt} : I feel foolish for thinking that it hadn't already happened. Of course it had. How could it not?", ">>{Trauerkraus} : No. The reporter called him an idiot when Milo said that he'd call Leslie Jones a man to her face. That is why he got the response he did. And the reporter would be correct.", '>>{preemptivebanana} : After reading up on Milo Yiannopoulos, I think it would be foolish to spend anymore time on him than is necessary to make this statement.', '>>{theonlylawislove} : This is actually very accurate. He is literally a gay Catholic homophobe.', '>>{The_YoungWolf} : He tried to pander to the white nationalist/Neo-Nazi wing of the alt-right months ago and they metaphorically spat in his face. But the more "moderate" useful idiots like GamerGaters and "fiscally conservative social liberals" won\'t ever stop licking his boots. He validates them too much and is their only real outlet for publicity. There was even an incident over a year back where KiA started to doubt their faith in him because of an awful hit piece he wrote against a critic, and he responded by brazenly insulting them - they fell over each other begging for his foregiveness. Even now, after he\'s left GG behind and derides KiA specifically, that crowd still thinks he\'s the greatest dude. It\'s creepy. They\'re like abused housewives too scared to leave their man. EDIT: [The second incident in question](https://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3jps46/ethics_breitbart_pulls_a_gawker_publically_shames/cus15mi)', ">>{TheBlackMark} : That is quite understandable. He's a wretched human being.", ">>{HenryWCoveredInBees} : ABC news fights fire with fire, doesn't get all PC with Trumpster moron, right loses their minds.", ">>{HenryWCoveredInBees} : Were dealing with Milo, there isn't a very smart part of anything he does.", ">>{HenryWCoveredInBees} : Guess the reporter just wasn't being PC. Gonna have to get over it.", ">>{EggbroHam} : The answer to PC culture isn't to become completely uncivilized. If PC culture can be compared to the over use of antibacterial soap, causing increased troublesome bacterial resistance, Milo is solving the problem by wiping down the counters with his own feces.", '>>{teronert} : Ill give you a less bias answer. Political writer and pundit, hes controversial because of how he speaks about controversial issues. He has associated hinself with the alt right before and also works for Breitbart.', ">>{BadDecisionDino} : That's his secret. He already hates gay people. Dude is gay like S.E. Cupp is atheist.", '>>{Solario_ff14} : Oh please, conservatives have to stay in their carefully crafted safe spaces away from reality.', ">>{Solario_ff14} : When Holocaust survivors see the resemblance then it's time to take a long hard look at yourself.", '>>{johnfromberkeley} : What does the reporter have against 13 yr-old idiots?!', '>>{EltonBong} : He can be both. I disagree with him on like 90% of everything, but goddamn is it funny to watch him make radical feminists freak the fuck out.', '>>{Solario_ff14} : They have nothing on her so they have to resort to making things up to try and make it close.', ">>{Irishish} : >My rudeness creates conversation What a convenient cover for being a fucking asshole. Sellout to conservatives who quietly hate him thinks he's the next Mencken because he engages in 4chan tactics. I'm so goddamn sick of him.", ">>{ABZR} : Mark Cuban should broadcast a message to Milo. >DM on Twitter and I'll get you set up with a real cushy media job", '>>{ShaneKaiGlenn} : I guarantee Milo cries himself to sleep every night. This kind of bully facade is usually created to cover up deep-seated insecurities and self-esteem issues.', ">>{Irishish} : Would you say the same thing about, say, Ann Coulter? Milo's a gayer, younger Coulter. He confuses trolling with valuable political conversation and hurting people with raising awareness.", ">>{Semper-Fido} : Except Trumps campaign and the Breitbart network is a walking safe space. Don't kid yourself that this is some new non-PC era of free speech that is being ushered in.", '>>{Religiomism} : >milo comes across as the one in the right. Feels before reals', '>>{CatTrump} : And give views to a hate article? Get your hate speech out of Reddit', ">>{miked4o7} : Maybe it's because I'm in my mid 30's and live in adult world... but I don't get this whole thing about PC culture being some pandemic that has to dealt with as a national problem of some kind.", '>>{jschuch82} : SJW pc police are breeding an uncompetitive and lazy entitled generation and our country will suffer for it.', '>>{SWEETBRO} : the only people more childish than PC police are the people who never shut up about how much the PC police are "oppressing" them. the lot of you fools deserve each other.', ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > These students are allegedly adults so they should be able to endure the horror of someone else's words without retreating to a 'safe space' where everything is censored. In the real world they will have to confront far worse. Dude, you post in one of the biggest safe spaces on the internet, the_donald constantly. You clearly understand why safe spaces have some value. It seems like you only find safe spaces for people with views you disagree with objectionable.", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Actually I would post on r/Politics more frequently because I like arguing opinions, if it weren't for the reddit rules that limit you to 1 post every 10 minutes if you're in negative comment karma. It's a bit of a free speech killer.", ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > It's a bit of a free speech killer. So, you feel free speech entitles you to say whatever you like, wherever you like? Even if that wherever is private property?", ">>{TrumpCardStrategy} : What a joke, wouldn't be surprised if that sub is run by CTR seems like a parody.", '>>{TheyRedHot} : Steering the topic away or do you have a genuine comment on how PC culture is getting out of hand?', ">>{charlie_argument} : It's not. PC is a political boogyman trotted out by the right every 4 years because they're intellectually bankrupt and out of ideas; it's something simultaneously intangible and inarguable, and it's very effective at moving the Overton window in the direction of whomever is clutching their culture pearls and screaming the loudest at our lowest common denominator around election time.", ">>{Wurplewillow} : It's not PC culture it's the polarization of society and how criticism can be absolved due to echo chambers and safe spaces of ALL parties. That people believe they're entitled to everything when they're really entitled to nothing and due to this criticism is taken personally. This is not exclusive to Pc/SJW people. It's a real problem and no one wants to talk about it because it requires them to listen to criticism.", '>>{UvonTheTerrible} : Well, when that \'private property\' is a discussion forum who\'s purpose is for people to discuss things......yea. The point of r/Politics is to discuss politically relevant stories and the guidelines state "Vote based on quality, not opinion." Now we all know it doesn\'t work that way but I\'m an optimist so I keep trying.', '>>{fthrfesdwe} : Milo is just a troll similar to Ann Coulter and Trump. They just say stupid shit to piss people off. I wish people could stop feeding them.', '>>{TheEgregore} : It is definitely not a joke sub. Look at the alt right around the Internet. They echoe the exact same sentiments in the sub', '>>{daybreaker} : It\'s the irony of one of the pro-Milo people in here saying > Everyone should close their eyes and recite "sticks and stones..." to themselves 10 times. as a defense of Milo\'s words... hey. Maybe you guys should repeat that to *yourselves* when you hear "PC speech" that triggers you!', '>>{daybreaker} : Yep, its just the inverse PC speech. "I want to say whatever I want to be an asshole, and dont want to face any criticism over it"', '>>{daybreaker} : Yep. They hate PC, but need to be treated with kid gloves even moreso than the "PC" people they hate. Theyre so sensitive.', ">>{CouchRadish} : It isn't the PC speech that we don't like, it's a growing population of 20-somethings more willing to plug their eyes and ears to the horrors of the world (and God forbid, other opinions) for the sake of virtue signaling and whatnot.", '>>{daybreaker} : > , it\'s a growing population of 20-somethings more willing to plug their eyes and ears to the horrors of the world (and God forbid, other opinions) for the sake of virtue signaling and whatnot. As someone who has dealt with people complaining about "PC culture ruining America" for like 20 years now, that\'s a handy recent justification.', ">>{CouchRadish} : I'd poke my head into /r/politics more often if it actually covered politics instead of being another arm for CTR and Bernie-to-Clinton supporters to demonize Trump. There's not much discussion to be had here.", '>>{TheyRedHot} : I agree it\'s not exclusive to PC/SJW people but Milo hates censorship. I don\'t agree with everything he says but look at our media, look at our schools. Safe spaces everywhere. But the thing is radical SJW culture is poisonous. I\'m not talking about the right to call people n****rs and calling every Muslim a terrorist, that\'s not the damn point. That\'s disgusting and stupid. It\'s about how society is trying to make certain groups immune from all criticism. Fat feminists: lower the bar, don\'t criticize our health choices. Go heart disease! A terrorist attack: Definitely not radical Isl@m. (Avoiding the ban bot). Even on this damn website I could get banned for criticizing the negative aspects of Islam but not for saying "fuck Christianity, fucked up religion". I dare you to make a thread about the former and you will get banned.', '>>{jschuch82} : Sure. Perfect example is the university of Missouri. The president lost his job bc of a poop swastika and alleged racial slurs directed towards the student body president. Take a look at that schools enrollment numbers now. The University as a whole suffered for the actions of a few.', ">>{Wurplewillow} : I really don't understand how they can absolve themselves from criticism when they're being criticized", ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > Well, when that 'private property' is a discussion forum who's purpose is for people to discuss things......yea. So, should a part of your house where people tend to congregate like the living room or kitchen also be a free speech zone where anyone can say anything they want, any time they want? If a group of Jehovah's Witnesses knock on your door do you feel obligated to let them in to proselytize because of free speech?", '>>{TheGreatWolfRuss} : the only people that complain about "PC" culture are people not worth listening to. like milo', ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : If I invite a group of people into my house to discuss a particular topic then yea, I think there's an expectation that when they show up I'm going to let them speak.", '>>{CouchRadish} : It\'s a group of people more interested in emotional well being than physical. It\'s a group that tries to "rank" different groups of people (I believe it\'s called Oppression Olympics in some circles) and these rankings constantly switch around at the whim of sheltered 22 year olds. Take the Pulse nightclub shooting. 50+ people dead in a targeted shooting of a gay nightclub by an ISIS lone wolf. You think the SJW people would defend the gays, right? Wrong. They defended the Muslims, saying that calls to action were "Islamophobic".', ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > If I invite a group of people into my house to discuss a particular topic then yea Oh, so on **your** private property some limitations and rules for speech are ok? But not on other people's private property?", ">>{TrumpCardStrategy} : I mean just read the sidebar tho. Even if these guys are serious they are a joke. They sound like some angry Aspergers kids that are now in their mid 20's, still virgins, and only interact with the world through their computer screen. I wouldn't elevate these guys above what they really are just because they globbed on to the alt right label.", '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : I mean, I used to be have a lot of problems with people being overly politically correct because I thought it often encouraged people to avoid honest dialogue about the real issues. Now the right wing has moved the goalposts so much that they define being a civil human being as being "politically correct". Donald Trump mocks a disabled reporter with what Ann Coulter calls the "standard retard", and when he gets called out for being indecent, he just says he\'s not politically correct. The biggest irony is that calling someone "politically correct" is now a way to attempt to dismiss their argument with buzzwords, which is what these people that rant about politically correctness purport to be against.', '>>{charlie_argument} : Trump folks are really starting to lose their edge. Is it a low energy thing?', ">>{NeverDrumpf2016} : If you are against censorship, then you would support the right of private people and entities to call out Milo for his bullshit. Milo can say what he wants, but Twtter banning him is *their* way of exercising free speech against Milo. And this ABC reporter calling him an idiot is also a form of politically incorrect speech. This is my biggest problem with the anti-pc crowd, the hypocrisy. They aren't for free speech, they just don't want to face the consequences when other people are allowed to talk back to them.", '>>{TheEgregore} : Yes, this is literally what "alt-right" is', '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : Terrorism creates conversations too, so I guess that means Milo supports terrorism?', ">>{IAMA_LongHorse} : That's a straight up lie. They defended the gay community *and* said that blaming all Muslims was wrong.", ">>{NeverDrumpf2016} : I mean, he's biased, but it's not like you stumbled onto some great discovery, he wasn't attempting to hide his bias.", ">>{NeverDrumpf2016} : You're right, he wasn't trying to hide his bias, that's why pointing out his bias is foolish.", '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : Sorry the ABC reporter was to politically incorrect for you, I suggest finding a safe space.', '>>{beehive4} : Says a delusional leftist moron that has no idea what reality actually is.', ">>{SWEETBRO} : > They aren't for free speech, they just don't want to face the consequences when other people are allowed to talk back to them. that's exactly it. somehow in their minds being telling someone they're acting like a dick is worse than acting like a dick.", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : Since you're not really making any sense at this point I think we'll have to stop things here.", ">>{someone447} : That's because anyone who isn't an insane, raving, racist, sexist lunatic doesn't support Trump. Donald Trump is a neo-fascist demagogue who is appealing to people's xenophobic tendencies. If that's what you want, more power to you. Just realize that sane people don't want a Mussolini-lite president of this country.", ">>{Irishish} : He makes decent people stare in contempt, he's not just triggering tumblr users or whatever the hell.", ">>{Irishish} : Gamergate? Honestly though I don't know. He claims he's standing up for free speech, but it seems like all that means is insulting feminists and writing cringey stuff on Breitbart. He thinks he's saying and doing something new and exciting, but I've been immersed in the same bullshit on 4chan for nearly 12 years. He's just louder and gayer, the alt-right's dancing gay monkey.", ">>{TheyRedHot} : Wrong. I definitely support the right of people to call Milo whatever they want. It's free speech. It's like the situation with Kaepernick. I think he has the right to sit down during the national anthem. He absolutely has the right. That doesn't mean I have to agree with his stupid, childish behavior. I'm not a hypocrite. I never said I am against criticism but of course, just call me out for something I never said. This is my biggest problem with the r/politics crowd, they are a bunch of condescending smart asses. And yes. Banning someone so they can't voice their opinions anymore is a great way of exercising free speech (it's not).", '>>{Irishish} : We defended both. We don\'t have to side with people on the right against millions of peaceful Muslims in order to condemn the actions of one. If you want to be mad at someone in the wake of the shooting, you can totally be mad at that one dumbass speaker on that one college campus who brought up BLM protests. or better yet, be angry at the Republicans who shot down anti-discrimination legislation mere days after the massacre happened. Don\'t be mad at SJWs for saying "we don\'t have to hate all Muslims in order to condemn this attack."', ">>{Irishish} : Insanely, some people believe they're mutually exclusive. If you say discrimination against Muslims is wrong you're clearly giving the OK to murderous homophobia.", '>>{NeverDrumpf2016} : Then what again is your problem with political correctness? All political correctness does is criticize people who say certain things or act certain ways, but you just said you are fine with criticism.', '>>{Irishish} : You have now been banned from /r/conservative and /r/The_Donald', ">>{ALoudMouthBaby} : > Since you're not really making any sense This should be food for thought about how you view free speech.", '>>{Irishish} : >hes controversial because of how he speaks about controversial issues. But the thing is, "how he speaks" is trolling. Like, a step away from dismissing the BLM movement by saying maybe black people are just lazy criminal spooks, but then smirking and saying you\'re just joking, jeez, chill out black people. He offers nothing of value.'], ['>>{Trumpicana} : Did you watch her speech when she literally played the woman card? Did she even mention 1 issue men are facing today like high suicide rates or falling way behind in college and wages for under 30 men? 70% of college grads are women and they make 10% more for the same work if under 30. Young Men have alot of issues people are ignoring and its why trump is rising.', '>>{foolfools} : No, feminism is for all genders, including men. I would think white men would want even playing fields and honest competition to "make america great".', ">>{ablurdumur} : If the Bus tour she and Kaine are currently undertaking in Pennsylvania and Ohio is any indication, I'd say no.", ">>{_scubasteve} : If feminism is for men included, why aren't they protesting the absurd amount of rape in men's prisons? More men are sexually assaulted in the US than women. EDIT: switched rape with sexual assault.", '>>{foolfools} : >More men are raped in the US than women. Cite? Maybe they are know the entire prison industrial complex is a clusterfuck, why deal with only one aspect of it?', '>>{ablurdumur} : While Prison rape is a seriously underreported issue, the charge that men are raped more than women is provably false.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : > 70% of college grads are women and they make 10% more for the same work if under 30. Source?', ">>{Trumpicana} : http://www.nber.org/digest/jan07/w12139.html http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/women-now-33-more-likely-men-earn-college-degrees Women have out paced men in college degree's since the 70's. Boys in k-12 have fallen so far behind women its not even funny.", ">>{Trigger_Me_Harder} : > Did she even mention 1 issue men are facing today like high suicide rates or falling way behind in college and wages for under 30 men? Yes. She went over both those issues. She has plans for mental health, wage stagnation and college debt. You should check out the convention, it's all covered.", '>>{Trumpicana} : Its not though. More money wont solve this problem. Its starts in k-12 and the way we teach boys. Boys and girls learn differently and we have catered education to girls. We are now doing the same thing with our job markets. Its why manufacturing was shipped off in favor of white collar service sector jobs. We have been catering the entire country to women for 40 years. Its why the family structure is also falling apart now. The black community was hit the hardest by these changes especially black men. Social services and family law are much the same. Favor women over men.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : Thanks for the links! What is Trump going to do about this issue?', ">>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : > Social services and family law are much the same. Favor women over men. I agree with this 100%. I think it's horrible how hard it is for a man to win custody of a child. But what's wrong with the k-12 system? As in how is it catering to girls?", '>>{Trumpicana} : I watched my brother spend 40000 dollars to lose custody to a drug addict mother who had one of their kids die under her watch in nebraska. Family law is atrocious.', '>>{Trumpicana} : 90% of teachers are now female, they have cut recess and gym, they have punished boys for having more energy and changed courses so less competition happens between students. Women often dont understand boys if they dont have a son. Zero tolerance policies as well effect far more boys than girls. Boys are far different than girls and any parent who has one of each can tell you that.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I agree with some of his points, the government should not make a profit on student loans and education should be comprehensive. But how does that translate to more men going to college?', '>>{Trumpicana} : There are other points in there that address that though he needs to do more. Colleges should be as close to 50-50 as possible.', '>>{Trumpicana} : How authoritarian of you. You are the reason both sides cant come together on certain issues. You rather poison the discourse than have a conversation.', '>>{bodiaz6} : Was thinking the same thing. Cookies pandered out to every group except blue wm. She does have the union chief stumping for her & maybe she starts targeting the infrastructure spending plan more to blue wm.', '>>{singuslarity} : The Democratic party wrote them off long ago, leaving them to be taken for granted by the Republican party.', ">>{Chuck419} : Competition is really important. It's what drives society.", '>>{Jake314159265359} : How do kids "compete" when it comes to learning?', '>>{Chuck419} : Tons of ways, art projects, science fairs, gym class, spelling bees, math bowls, speech competitions ext', '>>{Trumpicana} : KKK member because I want to see minorities doing better?', '>>{prredlin} : Saw her in harrisburg last night. She was terrible as shit. Didnt address trade or economy once. It was a full shit on trump show.', '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : You know you are talking to the indoctrinated when they bring up the kkk as some kind of boogie man. Kkk has less than 5000 members nationwide. They havent been relevant since 1980.', ">>{S629A} : No she hasn't, but she doesn't need them. Trump could win white men by 60% (Obama lost them by a 2-1 margin) and still lose this election. My guess is that Trump wins them by between 40-50%. My projections for the election: White men- no college degree: Trump +45 White women- no college degree: Trump +15 White men- college degree: Trump +10 White women- college degree: Clinton +20 Whites total: Trump +14 Non-whites: Clinton +65 Final margin: Clinton +7"]]

classify and reply

['>>{RileyWWarrick} : Tom Perez won’t apologize for insulting Trump and GOP leaders. Here’s why.', '>>{InertiaInMyPants} : Reason 1. They are fucking up the country.', ">>{kevin3g} : The truth needs no apology. I'd like to see Trump and his surrogate liars apologize for the stream of lies we've had to endure.", '>>{Deadcharacter} : Good for him. Nice to see some backbone from the Dems. Perez should keep up that hard line. The Dem base will reward it in 2018.', '>>{backfromthedead} : This is why they keep screwing us. People think him insulting the GOP rather than rejecting policy that screws us is showing backbone. No hope for America with this level understanding about politics.', '>>{Chefca} : Why would he need to apologize? The "President" of our union slandered the previous president for years with no apology or consequences. A sitting congressman interrupted the previous very respectful president and yelled that he was a liar with no apology or consequences. We\'ve reached the point where decorum and civility doesn\'t matter. Pretty soon a Democrat is going to realize they can fund their next three campaigns by simply walking up to trump and spitting in his face. ^^^^I ^^^^know ^^^^I\'d ^^^^donate ^^^^at ^^^^least ^^^^100 ^^^^dollars', '>>{mathemology} : Never forget the piece of shit Republican congressman that yelled "You lie!" in the middle of Obama\'s speech. Nothing negative happened to that man. In fact he enjoyed a nice increase in his fan base.', ">>{PotaToss} : He's insulting them for consistently promoting policy that screws us. From the article, quoting Perez's spokesperson, Xochitl Hinojosa: > “Tom Perez has said repeatedly, including in New Jersey, that Republican leaders like Donald Trump, Paul Ryan and others in Congress have shown us that they don’t care about the American people, especially when it comes to providing families with affordable health insurance,” she said in the email. “The Republican health-care bill would have taken away coverage from 24 million people, imposed an age tax, and made Americans pay more money for less care. Republicans are making it harder to save for retirement, and one of the first acts under President Trump was to make it harder for homebuyers to afford a mortgage. These actions and many others are further proof that Republican leaders in Washington don’t care about the American people and are only looking out for their wealthy friends.”", '>>{backfromthedead} : Yeah!!!!! Get em Perez!!! Boy are you a tough progressive fighting for the people and not corporate interests for insulting those republicans!', '>>{fkdsla} : Do the Dems have sufficient representation in either house of the legislature to block the policy that screws us?', '>>{Deadcharacter} : He is rejecting GOP policy. That is why he insults them. The Dems has treated the GOP with kid gloves for years. That have to change and this is a welcome start.', ">>{backfromthedead} : Perez is fighting for the DNC's corporate donors. Not you. Keith Ellison would have fought for you. That's why the DNC blocked him in favor of their corporate donors", ">>{Deadcharacter} : Believe what you want. IMO he is advocating for both the people and donors. Ellison would have done the same. He is not stupid. He knows that 50 state strategy needs bucket loads of money. You can argue that the DNC could get that money from small donor donations, but in reality, that is not possible. The DNC is not big candidate, like Sanders was, who you could support. Many people has that kind of distain already baked in, so those people would never donate to the DNC. Also, the DNC does not set policy. The DNC is an organizing and support vehicle for Dem candidates. They will support candidates they think can WIN. But organizing takes a lot of money. You cannot kneecap yourself by shunning money. The RNC will take every advantage there is and smother the Dem candidates in their crib. So please, don't be a naive person. Also, the DNC didn't block anybody. The DNC members voted and chose Perez. It is as simple as that. There is not a conspiracy behind everything, you know.", ">>{backfromthedead} : > but in reality, that is not possible. This is not true and you have been duped. You're just repeating DNC talking points, they've tricked you. If you are a representative of the people, the people will support you. Bernie Sanders would be president right now doing just that. He didn't sell out to anyone. Because he DIDN'T sell out...the DNC screwed and cheated him for their corporate donors. This is why we have Trump now. But hey..let them keep this strategy going. They think we're stupid. We're not. When they keep getting devastated like they did this time because no progressive shows up maybe they will get the message. Their donors have deep pockets. They can flush money down the drain and fund losses for a lonnnng time.", '>>{Tadra29} : Apologize? He needs to make this the center of his message and keep repeating it once a day.', '>>{Roseking} : Um... Keith is working with Perez. They just did a live stream together the other week, and are now working together across the country. They are friends.', ">>{yeti77} : You're missing the point. The cussing and insults are meant to 1: actually get air time. The media is more likely to cover someone speaking like this rather than normal political speak. 2: fire up the base. 3: sound like a normal American. Trump showed the power of not talking like a politician. We can turn it on him.", '>>{backfromthedead} : What I\'m saying here Yeti is that people think Tom Perez simply insulting the GOP is showing backbone. If they can win you over this easy without having to actually DO anything..then well... you tell me what what you think happens next. Exactly what is happening all around you now. Tom Perez is a corporate shill. Just like Hillary is a corporate shill. Do you know anyone who has died from heroin? I do. The pharmaceutical industry paid the DNC, and Hillary walked out on stage and said no legal marijuana. In states that have legal marijuana heroin overdoses are plummeting. The DNC is taking money from large corporations and this is destroying our lives and killing us for their profits. Showing "backbone" is coming out for legal marijuana. Not insulting the GOP. Demand better. Demand what we DESERVE. Don\'t let these assholes screw you. Don\'t let them lie to you. Stay informed..or how should I put it...stay "woke"', ">>{BannonsReichstagFire} : Keith Ellison, you mean Perez's #2 guy in the DNC? Sad that he's nowhere near a position to help us, oh no! One person away from the top of the DNC? We've truly failed as a party...", ">>{backfromthedead} : > you mean Perez's #2 guy Ohhhhh. I think you are referring to the position they made up to placate the dummies. lol. In theory and on paper this is was a good strategy, but in reality it's not because you are looking for politically uninformed people within a group of progressives. They are simply not going to have the numbers here like they would if we were conservatives.", ">>{BannonsReichstagFire} : You're so right - did you know they actually locked Keith Ellison 5 miles below the earth in a futuristic supermax prison with robot guards, where he can do NOTHING to help progressive causes? Oh, how evil the DNC is!", ">>{backfromthedead} : HahahahHa!! You think they have to go to extreme measures when literally all they have to do is insult the GOP and they're showing backbone! You're giving yourself too much credit", ">>{BannonsReichstagFire} : Nah man, I know he's the #2 guy in the DNC and all, but that's what the dummies believe, not smart guys like you and me - I hear they're actually teaming up with Elon Musk to hitch Keith Ellison to a rocket and send him into space where he can never work for a progressive cause again!", '>>{backfromthedead} : Yes. Smart guys like you and me know that progressives wanted Keith Ellison because he was going to fight for us and the DNC wanted a corporate shill instead. So they CREATED a position for Keith to make it seem like they care about the people and not their corporate donors.', '>>{BannonsReichstagFire} : Which is, of course, exactly how they get rid of someone. "We don\'t like this guy, we don\'t want him influencing us at all - what can we do?" "I KNOW. Let\'s create a new position for him above everyone in the DNC but Perez. That\'ll ensure we never hear from Keith Ellison again!"', '>>{malignantbacon} : >How dare they tell the American people the truth about voting for us? HOW DARE THEY', '>>{bootlegvader} : Minority and female voters are now corporations? Seeing how they were the ones that rejected Bernie costing him the primary. Also Bernie loves corporations as long as they benefit Vermont.', '>>{Quietus42} : >him insulting the GOP rather than rejecting policy that screws us. Por que no los dos, tio?', ">>{Quietus42} : >You're just repeating DNC talking points, they've tricked you. Buddy, that street goes two ways. You're repeating Putin propaganda. They've tricked *you*.", '>>{POTUS_is_a_POS} : Fuck Trump and the treasonous, Russia-colluding, obstructionist, enabling GOP infrastructure!', '>>{SeigX} : We have bigger shit to worry about right now than if Perez passes your obscure progressive purity test that no one cares about. You people sound like the tea party on the left.', '>>{icansmellcolors} : Showing backbone is an opinion. There is no backbone meter or actual measurable scale of showing backbone. Your argument is strange about this specific backbone deal.', '>>{Xenocidegs} : Perez is condemning republicans for their policy positions that hurt the average American. How is that a bad thing?', '>>{Deadcharacter} : Indeed. He still represents Vermont and wants it to thrive. Also, he is more pragmatic than people think. He does not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Also, IMO he has branded himself wrongly. He is a self described dem socialist, but to me, he seems like a mainstream New Deal or Great Society Democrat.', ">>{bootlegvader} : I have no problem with serving Vermont's industries however I take issue when other Democrats that do the same with their state's industries are made into villians.", '>>{HotCrossBlonde} : Please tell me what you actually know about Tom Perez.', ">>{HotCrossBlonde} : See: Cory Booker. He voted against Sanders's pharma amendment because he represents New Jersey, a state with a huge pharma presence, so he's a corporate shill. But it's ok when Bernie does it.", ">>{backfromthedead} : How about [this?](http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/10/11/labor-secretary-advised-clinton-cast-sanders-candidate-whites-turn-minorities) This guy is not on your side and he's a scumbag. He screwed you for corporate interests that's why we have Trump. This plan to paint people critical of the scumbag corrupt DNC as Russian agents, or ill-informed would work better if we were conservatives. That's why it's so stupid they tried it and are continuing to lie to us and screw their own party. We are their voters amiright? Why would we vote for these scumbags?? Why? Because it's the lesser of two evils?? This is why things never change. Because we settle for mediocrity. Fuck Perez. Fuck the DNC", '>>{HotCrossBlonde} : Oh no, a politician played politics. This is no more scummy than any other politician', ">>{backfromthedead} : Yes he played politics to screw you over for large corporations and the rich and that's pretty scummy seeing as how he was supposed to be on our side", '>>{IamConradBlack} : So truth about the republican government is an insult?', ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : And that changes the fact that his supposed insult is simply telling the truth about Republicans how? Oh, that's right, it doesn't and you aren't interested in whether it does or not. You're here to change the subject and deflect the blame from where it belongs. Trump and the GOP are the problem. Stop deflecting.", ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : He's telling the truth. Just because the truth hurts someone's feelings and they want to call it an insult doesn't make it any less true. Stop deflecting and changing the subject. Whether or not Perez is subject to corporate influence doesn't change the fact that there isn't a member of the GOP who isn't completely owned by those same corporations.", '>>{backfromthedead} : Like I said "Trump is bad" didn\'t work for Hillary but the DNC is more than welcome to keep flushing their donors millions down the sewer drain thinking it\'s going to rally us around their corporate shills. Lol. Their donors have deep pockets. Lots of millions to lose.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{RileyWWarrick} : Tom Perez won’t apologize for insulting Trump and GOP leaders. Here’s why.', '>>{InertiaInMyPants} : Reason 1. They are fucking up the country.', ">>{kevin3g} : The truth needs no apology. I'd like to see Trump and his surrogate liars apologize for the stream of lies we've had to endure.", '>>{Deadcharacter} : Good for him. Nice to see some backbone from the Dems. Perez should keep up that hard line. The Dem base will reward it in 2018.', '>>{backfromthedead} : This is why they keep screwing us. People think him insulting the GOP rather than rejecting policy that screws us is showing backbone. No hope for America with this level understanding about politics.', '>>{Chefca} : Why would he need to apologize? The "President" of our union slandered the previous president for years with no apology or consequences. A sitting congressman interrupted the previous very respectful president and yelled that he was a liar with no apology or consequences. We\'ve reached the point where decorum and civility doesn\'t matter. Pretty soon a Democrat is going to realize they can fund their next three campaigns by simply walking up to trump and spitting in his face. ^^^^I ^^^^know ^^^^I\'d ^^^^donate ^^^^at ^^^^least ^^^^100 ^^^^dollars', '>>{mathemology} : Never forget the piece of shit Republican congressman that yelled "You lie!" in the middle of Obama\'s speech. Nothing negative happened to that man. In fact he enjoyed a nice increase in his fan base.', ">>{PotaToss} : He's insulting them for consistently promoting policy that screws us. From the article, quoting Perez's spokesperson, Xochitl Hinojosa: > “Tom Perez has said repeatedly, including in New Jersey, that Republican leaders like Donald Trump, Paul Ryan and others in Congress have shown us that they don’t care about the American people, especially when it comes to providing families with affordable health insurance,” she said in the email. “The Republican health-care bill would have taken away coverage from 24 million people, imposed an age tax, and made Americans pay more money for less care. Republicans are making it harder to save for retirement, and one of the first acts under President Trump was to make it harder for homebuyers to afford a mortgage. These actions and many others are further proof that Republican leaders in Washington don’t care about the American people and are only looking out for their wealthy friends.”", '>>{backfromthedead} : Yeah!!!!! Get em Perez!!! Boy are you a tough progressive fighting for the people and not corporate interests for insulting those republicans!', '>>{fkdsla} : Do the Dems have sufficient representation in either house of the legislature to block the policy that screws us?', '>>{Deadcharacter} : He is rejecting GOP policy. That is why he insults them. The Dems has treated the GOP with kid gloves for years. That have to change and this is a welcome start.', ">>{backfromthedead} : Perez is fighting for the DNC's corporate donors. Not you. Keith Ellison would have fought for you. That's why the DNC blocked him in favor of their corporate donors", ">>{Deadcharacter} : Believe what you want. IMO he is advocating for both the people and donors. Ellison would have done the same. He is not stupid. He knows that 50 state strategy needs bucket loads of money. You can argue that the DNC could get that money from small donor donations, but in reality, that is not possible. The DNC is not big candidate, like Sanders was, who you could support. Many people has that kind of distain already baked in, so those people would never donate to the DNC. Also, the DNC does not set policy. The DNC is an organizing and support vehicle for Dem candidates. They will support candidates they think can WIN. But organizing takes a lot of money. You cannot kneecap yourself by shunning money. The RNC will take every advantage there is and smother the Dem candidates in their crib. So please, don't be a naive person. Also, the DNC didn't block anybody. The DNC members voted and chose Perez. It is as simple as that. There is not a conspiracy behind everything, you know.", ">>{backfromthedead} : > but in reality, that is not possible. This is not true and you have been duped. You're just repeating DNC talking points, they've tricked you. If you are a representative of the people, the people will support you. Bernie Sanders would be president right now doing just that. He didn't sell out to anyone. Because he DIDN'T sell out...the DNC screwed and cheated him for their corporate donors. This is why we have Trump now. But hey..let them keep this strategy going. They think we're stupid. We're not. When they keep getting devastated like they did this time because no progressive shows up maybe they will get the message. Their donors have deep pockets. They can flush money down the drain and fund losses for a lonnnng time.", '>>{Tadra29} : Apologize? He needs to make this the center of his message and keep repeating it once a day.', '>>{Roseking} : Um... Keith is working with Perez. They just did a live stream together the other week, and are now working together across the country. They are friends.', ">>{yeti77} : You're missing the point. The cussing and insults are meant to 1: actually get air time. The media is more likely to cover someone speaking like this rather than normal political speak. 2: fire up the base. 3: sound like a normal American. Trump showed the power of not talking like a politician. We can turn it on him.", '>>{backfromthedead} : What I\'m saying here Yeti is that people think Tom Perez simply insulting the GOP is showing backbone. If they can win you over this easy without having to actually DO anything..then well... you tell me what what you think happens next. Exactly what is happening all around you now. Tom Perez is a corporate shill. Just like Hillary is a corporate shill. Do you know anyone who has died from heroin? I do. The pharmaceutical industry paid the DNC, and Hillary walked out on stage and said no legal marijuana. In states that have legal marijuana heroin overdoses are plummeting. The DNC is taking money from large corporations and this is destroying our lives and killing us for their profits. Showing "backbone" is coming out for legal marijuana. Not insulting the GOP. Demand better. Demand what we DESERVE. Don\'t let these assholes screw you. Don\'t let them lie to you. Stay informed..or how should I put it...stay "woke"', ">>{BannonsReichstagFire} : Keith Ellison, you mean Perez's #2 guy in the DNC? Sad that he's nowhere near a position to help us, oh no! One person away from the top of the DNC? We've truly failed as a party...", ">>{backfromthedead} : > you mean Perez's #2 guy Ohhhhh. I think you are referring to the position they made up to placate the dummies. lol. In theory and on paper this is was a good strategy, but in reality it's not because you are looking for politically uninformed people within a group of progressives. They are simply not going to have the numbers here like they would if we were conservatives.", ">>{BannonsReichstagFire} : You're so right - did you know they actually locked Keith Ellison 5 miles below the earth in a futuristic supermax prison with robot guards, where he can do NOTHING to help progressive causes? Oh, how evil the DNC is!", ">>{backfromthedead} : HahahahHa!! You think they have to go to extreme measures when literally all they have to do is insult the GOP and they're showing backbone! You're giving yourself too much credit", ">>{BannonsReichstagFire} : Nah man, I know he's the #2 guy in the DNC and all, but that's what the dummies believe, not smart guys like you and me - I hear they're actually teaming up with Elon Musk to hitch Keith Ellison to a rocket and send him into space where he can never work for a progressive cause again!", '>>{backfromthedead} : Yes. Smart guys like you and me know that progressives wanted Keith Ellison because he was going to fight for us and the DNC wanted a corporate shill instead. So they CREATED a position for Keith to make it seem like they care about the people and not their corporate donors.', '>>{BannonsReichstagFire} : Which is, of course, exactly how they get rid of someone. "We don\'t like this guy, we don\'t want him influencing us at all - what can we do?" "I KNOW. Let\'s create a new position for him above everyone in the DNC but Perez. That\'ll ensure we never hear from Keith Ellison again!"', '>>{malignantbacon} : >How dare they tell the American people the truth about voting for us? HOW DARE THEY', '>>{bootlegvader} : Minority and female voters are now corporations? Seeing how they were the ones that rejected Bernie costing him the primary. Also Bernie loves corporations as long as they benefit Vermont.', '>>{Quietus42} : >him insulting the GOP rather than rejecting policy that screws us. Por que no los dos, tio?', ">>{Quietus42} : >You're just repeating DNC talking points, they've tricked you. Buddy, that street goes two ways. You're repeating Putin propaganda. They've tricked *you*.", '>>{POTUS_is_a_POS} : Fuck Trump and the treasonous, Russia-colluding, obstructionist, enabling GOP infrastructure!', '>>{SeigX} : We have bigger shit to worry about right now than if Perez passes your obscure progressive purity test that no one cares about. You people sound like the tea party on the left.', '>>{icansmellcolors} : Showing backbone is an opinion. There is no backbone meter or actual measurable scale of showing backbone. Your argument is strange about this specific backbone deal.', '>>{Xenocidegs} : Perez is condemning republicans for their policy positions that hurt the average American. How is that a bad thing?', '>>{Deadcharacter} : Indeed. He still represents Vermont and wants it to thrive. Also, he is more pragmatic than people think. He does not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Also, IMO he has branded himself wrongly. He is a self described dem socialist, but to me, he seems like a mainstream New Deal or Great Society Democrat.', ">>{bootlegvader} : I have no problem with serving Vermont's industries however I take issue when other Democrats that do the same with their state's industries are made into villians.", '>>{HotCrossBlonde} : Please tell me what you actually know about Tom Perez.', ">>{HotCrossBlonde} : See: Cory Booker. He voted against Sanders's pharma amendment because he represents New Jersey, a state with a huge pharma presence, so he's a corporate shill. But it's ok when Bernie does it.", ">>{backfromthedead} : How about [this?](http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/10/11/labor-secretary-advised-clinton-cast-sanders-candidate-whites-turn-minorities) This guy is not on your side and he's a scumbag. He screwed you for corporate interests that's why we have Trump. This plan to paint people critical of the scumbag corrupt DNC as Russian agents, or ill-informed would work better if we were conservatives. That's why it's so stupid they tried it and are continuing to lie to us and screw their own party. We are their voters amiright? Why would we vote for these scumbags?? Why? Because it's the lesser of two evils?? This is why things never change. Because we settle for mediocrity. Fuck Perez. Fuck the DNC", '>>{HotCrossBlonde} : Oh no, a politician played politics. This is no more scummy than any other politician', ">>{backfromthedead} : Yes he played politics to screw you over for large corporations and the rich and that's pretty scummy seeing as how he was supposed to be on our side", '>>{IamConradBlack} : So truth about the republican government is an insult?', ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : And that changes the fact that his supposed insult is simply telling the truth about Republicans how? Oh, that's right, it doesn't and you aren't interested in whether it does or not. You're here to change the subject and deflect the blame from where it belongs. Trump and the GOP are the problem. Stop deflecting.", ">>{ifyoupaiditisntfree} : He's telling the truth. Just because the truth hurts someone's feelings and they want to call it an insult doesn't make it any less true. Stop deflecting and changing the subject. Whether or not Perez is subject to corporate influence doesn't change the fact that there isn't a member of the GOP who isn't completely owned by those same corporations.", '>>{backfromthedead} : Like I said "Trump is bad" didn\'t work for Hillary but the DNC is more than welcome to keep flushing their donors millions down the sewer drain thinking it\'s going to rally us around their corporate shills. Lol. Their donors have deep pockets. Lots of millions to lose.']]

classify and reply

[">>{jayrockslife} : [Mostly games that I don't play but keep in case I get bored](http://imgur.com/E9dpWVt)", '>>{jdayellow} : Jesus Christ how do you use 160 gb of photos', '>>{niartiasnoba} : 6 trips overseas plus many more domestic trips dating back to my 5s :)', ">>{kilof_} : It's a bloated app, some people experience battery drain thanks to it but at least for me I don't have any problems.", '>>{jdayellow} : Woah nice I had to delete all my pics between 2015-2016 because I kept running out of iCloud space. I just keep all my photos in google photos now and I turned off iCloud storage backup because 5gb is ridiculous.', ">>{jdayellow} : It doesn't seem that bad to me. I haven't had any issues with it be it android or iOS.", ">>{niartiasnoba} : yeah fair enough man. I keep them all locally on ym iMac and then on my phone as well + Time Machine backup. 256gb min phone is the future man, I couldn't do without it", ">>{BuzakaSteve} : I recommend deleting the app and seeing if there is a difference in speed and battery. If you don't see it, then I'm wrong and you are right.", '>>{jdayellow} : Wow. As you can see from my photo, even 32gb is impossible for me to fill up even though I use my phone 25/8 :P. Even 64 gb is too much for me. 32gb is the sweet spot.', '>>{jdayellow} : I did it before back in 2015 on my iPhone 5s and it made absolutely no difference other than making my Facebook experience slow and buggy.', ">>{niartiasnoba} : true. If I didn't keep my photos locally my phone would be empty. I love my 256gb though, never have to worry and can throw movies on there without a second thought", ">>{jdayellow} : Lol how long have you been using the phone? I can't see why Snapchat is using 1.5 gb and messages almost 2.5 gb. For me snapchat only uses up around 500mb and message uses like 10mb", ">>{niartiasnoba} : I bought my 5s in December 2013(and the 6, 6s, and 7 plus all on release day), and I always restore from backup to keep all my data. so 3.5yrs? That would be it for messages. Snapchat I'd assume is just cached data from stories? I also have a pair of Spectacles and I think the videos are stored locally within the app so that would contribute to it too", ">>{jdayellow} : Nice. I'm a poor student so I can only upgrade every 2-3 years lol and I always get last years phone. What are spectacles? And I thought cached was deleted when you restore.", ">>{cooperred} : Even if it is a resource hog, using the website isn't a good replacement strategy for me", ">>{bizeebawdee} : [Mine](http://i.imgur.com/3nvCuKY.png) Netflix wouldn't usually be at the top, but I've downloaded some stuff because I'm abroad at the moment", '>>{Natureone24} : Eigentlich nur Egg Inc. die restlichen sind Platzfüller 😂', '>>{Cloned91} : Was ist denn Egg Inc. für ein Game ? :)', '>>{Cloned91} : das sieht so geil doof aus, dass ich es mir laden werde :D', '>>{Senthusiast5} : Backup your photos to Google Photos then delete them off your phone :) [My storage use](https://imgur.com/a/zGWGK) (93 apps installed)']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{jayrockslife} : [Mostly games that I don't play but keep in case I get bored](http://imgur.com/E9dpWVt)", '>>{jdayellow} : Jesus Christ how do you use 160 gb of photos', '>>{niartiasnoba} : 6 trips overseas plus many more domestic trips dating back to my 5s :)', ">>{kilof_} : It's a bloated app, some people experience battery drain thanks to it but at least for me I don't have any problems.", '>>{jdayellow} : Woah nice I had to delete all my pics between 2015-2016 because I kept running out of iCloud space. I just keep all my photos in google photos now and I turned off iCloud storage backup because 5gb is ridiculous.', ">>{jdayellow} : It doesn't seem that bad to me. I haven't had any issues with it be it android or iOS.", ">>{niartiasnoba} : yeah fair enough man. I keep them all locally on ym iMac and then on my phone as well + Time Machine backup. 256gb min phone is the future man, I couldn't do without it", ">>{BuzakaSteve} : I recommend deleting the app and seeing if there is a difference in speed and battery. If you don't see it, then I'm wrong and you are right.", '>>{jdayellow} : Wow. As you can see from my photo, even 32gb is impossible for me to fill up even though I use my phone 25/8 :P. Even 64 gb is too much for me. 32gb is the sweet spot.', '>>{jdayellow} : I did it before back in 2015 on my iPhone 5s and it made absolutely no difference other than making my Facebook experience slow and buggy.', ">>{niartiasnoba} : true. If I didn't keep my photos locally my phone would be empty. I love my 256gb though, never have to worry and can throw movies on there without a second thought", ">>{jdayellow} : Lol how long have you been using the phone? I can't see why Snapchat is using 1.5 gb and messages almost 2.5 gb. For me snapchat only uses up around 500mb and message uses like 10mb", ">>{niartiasnoba} : I bought my 5s in December 2013(and the 6, 6s, and 7 plus all on release day), and I always restore from backup to keep all my data. so 3.5yrs? That would be it for messages. Snapchat I'd assume is just cached data from stories? I also have a pair of Spectacles and I think the videos are stored locally within the app so that would contribute to it too", ">>{jdayellow} : Nice. I'm a poor student so I can only upgrade every 2-3 years lol and I always get last years phone. What are spectacles? And I thought cached was deleted when you restore.", ">>{cooperred} : Even if it is a resource hog, using the website isn't a good replacement strategy for me", ">>{bizeebawdee} : [Mine](http://i.imgur.com/3nvCuKY.png) Netflix wouldn't usually be at the top, but I've downloaded some stuff because I'm abroad at the moment", '>>{Natureone24} : Eigentlich nur Egg Inc. die restlichen sind Platzfüller 😂', '>>{Cloned91} : Was ist denn Egg Inc. für ein Game ? :)', '>>{Cloned91} : das sieht so geil doof aus, dass ich es mir laden werde :D', '>>{Senthusiast5} : Backup your photos to Google Photos then delete them off your phone :) [My storage use](https://imgur.com/a/zGWGK) (93 apps installed)']]

classify and reply

[">>{truthhurts4444} : Donald Trump hasn't made any offensive or inflammatory remarks about black Americans. But as a whole, black Americans react strongly toward any racial aggression directed toward other minorities. This is a result of generations of institutionalized and systemic racism aimed at black Americans, they know what it feels like to be the target of discrimination", ">>{ki_no_akuma} : So.. they'll have to gather in a different room?", '>>{NateGrey} : > Humphrey, a strong critic of the GOP nominee, wrote a letter Tuesday to New Hampshire\'s three representatives to the Republican National Committee encouraging them to take the party\'s nominee off the ticket. He argued that Trump\'s comments at a rally earlier Tuesday, where he appeared to joke about gun owners taking action against Hillary Clinton. was "the last straw." More people should be feeling this way.', '>>{Sidwill} : No, while they are it it why not explain why water is wet.', '>>{t3ht0ast3r} : >The White House press corps was stunned on Sunday by reports of a proposal by the Trump administration to eject reporters from their home in the West Wing — a move that, if carried out, would uproot decades of established protocol whereby journalists are allowed to work in the White House close to senior officials.', '>>{enslavedroosters} : Imagine if Obama wanted to do this 8 years ago when he was first elected. Just think of the outcry that would have occurred. They saw a dictator in Obama but Trump is just perfect. I was over in the_d yesterday and they were still going on about pizzagate and believing that to be true while mocking the "liberals" who were mentioning Trumps alleged ties in other subreddits. I can never tell if the_d users are being sarcastic or what. I\'ve found if you put them on the spot it\'s 50/50 what they will tell you. The other thing that I found curious is r/conspiracy don\'t seem to believe the Trump dossier, another Redditor mentioned that its probably the only time a conspiracy theory wasn\'t at least entertained on that subreddit. Strange times we are living in.', '>>{cmit} : Trump prepares to pass the world leadership baton to China', '>>{as_a_black_guy} : Not really. From shitty housing scandals to being the king of the birthers, there\'s nothing in the record that says "hey, take a shot on this trump guy, especially, because he\'d be great for black people"', ">>{t3ht0ast3r} : That appears to be Reince Preibus' clarification after the news garnered an overwhelmingly negative response. At this point the story is in its infancy so there isn't much information to go on.", ">>{Matues49} : InB4 Mr. Humphrey 'gets stopped' by second amendment folks,", '>>{wutziii} : Bob Schieffer, a longtime CBS News anchor who has covered eight previous presidential administrations, said on Sunday that he was not surprised to see tensions between a new president and the news media. “They’re not the first administration that’s come to office thinking they can control every single word that’s said about them,” he said in an interview. “It’s their call, they can do what they want to do, and if the public puts up with it, they’ll continue to do it that way.” But, he added: “If they think they’re not going to get the same intense coverage, they’ve been smoking something.” Bob Schieffer or ... Bob "Chiefer"', '>>{miashaee} : He did spread some neo-nazi propoganda against us with stereotypical black "thug" imagery and false murder stats with respect to black on white murders (much higher than the actual number) and white on black murders (a bit lower than the actual number). I mean that alone was enough to make me say "hey this guy might be racially biased against me due to my race". That\'s not the only thing that gives me pause with Trump with respect to black people but that is something that stands out. Also yeah the dog whistle stuff against other minority groups made it so I wouldn\'t vote for Trump, mostly because yeah I know what that is. The same reason he is loathed by black people is the same reason that he has so many neo-nazi supporters, a clear and consistent anti-minority undertone.', '>>{IbanezDavy} : But he had *his* black guy at *a* rally.', ">>{Brady_55} : Surprisingly insightful comment from you. You're totally right here.", ">>{anti-pope} : Let's see of 'other' powers within the US let this happen.", '>>{ki_no_akuma} : from another article that was floating around: >According to three senior officials on the transition team, a plan to evict the press corps from the White House is under serious consideration by the incoming Trump Administration. If the plan goes through, one of the officials said, the media will be removed from the cozy confines of the White House press room, where it has worked for several decades. Members of the press will be relocated to the White House Conference Center—near Lafayette Square—or to a space in the Old Executive Office Building, next door to the White House. http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/a52301/trump-evict-press-white-house/ seems more like a minor inconvenience to reporters than a reason to be Alarmed.', ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Because of the same reason they rejected McCain and Romney. They're Republicans.", '>>{Puffin_fan} : Too late for Harambe. And the sad thing is, he probably had a better temperment. Certainly more qualified. Just a little short in experience side. His hands would have been big enough ?', '>>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : Because his campaign is run by racists? Because his policies are racist? Because he has a long, long, history of racism in his business and personal life?', ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I'm gonna go out on a limb and posit that his suspicion that the first black President was born in Kenya probably hurt him in this demographic. EDIT: Oh! And that he founded ISIS. The man has said so much crazy shit it's hard to keep track sometimes.", ">>{las0m} : It's inevitable that this transition would occur sometime this century, Trump is just moving up the timetable.", '>>{miashaee} : Not entirely, there is a stronger element of bigotry and racism from the Trump camp than in the McCain or Romney camps to the point that I could never support him. With McCain and Romney given the right policy proposals and a softer tone on social issues I could have supported them. I mean I have been to McCain and Romney rallies before, but I REFUSE to go to a Trump rally because it can be a safespace for many bigots. Not risking my safety.', ">>{zablyzibly} : I was just looking over the conspiracy sub this morning and noticed the same thing. This is a gigantic scandal we know very little about. It's ripe for all kinds of speculation.", '>>{JacobCrim88} : Not at all. Must be a slow day at The Atlantic.', '>>{BrawndoTTM} : There is no mechanism whatsoever by which to do this. The only way would be to somehow get literally the most self-confident man in the entire world to voluntarily step down somehow.', '>>{ozabelle} : could write a book using trump\'s campaign: "how to offend almost everybody without even trying"', ">>{zablyzibly} : They should not allow Trump to suppress the media like this. It's bullshit. They better walk back on this because it makes them look a bunch of fascist assholes.", '>>{t3ht0ast3r} : A minor inconvenience as long as everything else remains the same. That\'s a big "If".', '>>{DebussySIMiami} : McCain actually refuted a supporter at his rally who said Obama is an Arab terrorist. Trump encourages and even helps spread such lies. The difference is night and day.', ">>{pengins4life} : Its much much too late for that, the GOP made their bed and now they need to lie in it. The most they could possibly do atm, is grow a spine and stop supporting Trump. Of course we know that isn't going to happen for a great many GOP Congress people like Paul Ryan.", ">>{redroguetech} : Let me count the ways. I hate love thee to the depth and breadth and height My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight For the ends of being and ideal grace. I hate thee to the level of every day's Most quiet need, by sun and candle-light. I hate thee freely, as men strive for right.", '>>{t3ht0ast3r} : >They better walk back on this because it makes them look like a bunch of fascist assholes **even more than they already do**. FTFY', '>>{dyzo-blue} : There is no law. The parties are private institutions and can do anything they damn well please.', ">>{rollerginger} : China has had it for a good while now. EU is in chaos and Obama-Clinton administration created lots of enemies outside now largely defunct EU. Those countries China has now collected under its own aegis (see: Philippines, Turkey, Russia, Pakistan, bunch of African and South-American states). Clinton would have likely triggered war with Russia over that, let's see what Trump will do. Best thing to do is yield and reorganize at this point.", ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : And McCain still had almost no black support. I don't care for the reason, but black Americans will not vote Republican. Jesus could run as a Republican and would still get 5% of the black vote", '>>{darkshark21} : Can he talk to a majority Black audience first? The NAACP gave him a platform for free and he declined. Now he has to listen to the prominent Black supporters he does have, but other members of his campaign seem to disregard their inputs.', ">>{pizzashill} : I'm not sure in what universe you thought this was inevitable.", '>>{trump_meth_cult} : Trump is such a foul disgusting piece of unintelligent racist trash, america is truly finished after promoting this sleezy conman.', ">>{pizzashill} : LOL WHAT, where do we even start with this comment. >> Obama-Clinton administration You mean the Bush admin? Obama repaired most of our relationships. >> Philippines A disgusting country run bu Hitler JR? >> Turkey An Islamist fascist dictatorship that depends on NATO for defense from Russia? >> Russia At no point have we been friends with Russia, not only that, Russia views China as a serious threat. >> Pakistan Considering this is another country that depends on US aid I'm not sure what world you're living in. >> Clinton would have likely triggered war with Russia over that A literal Russian propaganda talking point they've been spamming since the 1990s. >> Best thing to do is yield and reorganize at this point. Of course it is, comrade.", '>>{krashnburn200} : Maybe they will get moved to a fenced in "free speech zone" I I don\'t see why they should receive preferential treatment over regular citizens. Since apparently the zones are good enough for us, it\'s good enough for them.', ">>{rollerginger} : >You mean the Bush admin? Obama repaired most of our relationships. No he didn't. See: current situation. >A disgusting country run bu Hitler JR? Irrelevant. Was staunch US ally since WW2. >An Islamist fascist dictatorship that depends on NATO for defense from Russia? Irrelevant. NATO member now flipping bird to other NATO countries. >At no point have we been friends with Russia, not only that, Russia views China as a serious threat. Yes we were. Dubaya thawed relations considerably. No they don't. See: SCO. >Considering this is another country that depends on US aid I'm not sure what world you're living in. No it doesn't. See: Belt-and-road. >A literal Russian propaganda talking point they've been spamming since the 1990s. Obama escalated relations with Russia, and Clinton vowed to continue on that path. >Of course it is, comrade. Yes indeed.", '>>{roleparadise} : Yes there is. Rule 9 of the national GOP rules. They could declare him mentally unfit and/or a national security threat and have him removed and replaced.', ">>{nonamenolastname} : For those who read it (good book), Alexandre Dumas, The Three Musketeers, chapter one describes how D'Artagnan got stuck with this decrepit, good for nothing horse whose only noteworthy attribute was his unusual color: orange. History and fiction sometimes intertwine in rather unusual ways.", ">>{moxy801} : >There is no law If that is even so, the RNC must have rules for this, I am sure they cannot just 'do anything they damn well please'.", '>>{BoogerPresley} : “I have black guys counting my money. … I hate it. The only guys I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes all day.” (USA Today, May 20, 1991)', '>>{dyzo-blue} : > The Republican Party rules states that “the Republican National Committee is hereby authorized and empowered to fill any and all vacancies which may occur by reason of death, declination, or otherwise of the Republican candidate for President of the United States or the Republican candidate for Vice President of the United States.” The "otherwise" means "anything they damn well please".', ">>{BigFatHairyBalls} : Why won't they just hear him out. I mean...all of them are poor, their life sucks, they are terrible people, they have no jobs, everybody hates them, they suck, fuck them, Yada yada. Why *not* vote for Trump? -Trump surrogates", '>>{redroguetech} : > Donald Trump hasn\'t made any offensive or inflammatory remarks about black Americans. "There\'s no such thing as racism anymore. We\'ve had a black president so it\'s not a question anymore. Are they saying blacks lives should matter more than white lives or Asian lives? If Black Lives Matter, then go back to Africa? We\'ll see how much they matter there." "Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won’t see another black president for generations!" According to John O’Donnell, "And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day... I think [John O’Donnell] is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control." "One of the first things I’d do in terms of executive order if I win would be to sign a strong, strong statement that will go out to the country, out to the world, that anybody caught killing a policeman, policewoman, police officer, anybody killing a police officer: death penalty. It’s gonna happen. OK? We can’t let this go." "Mayor [Ed] Koch has stated that hate and rancor should be removed from our hearts. I do not think so. I want to hate these muggers and murderers. They should be forced to suffer and, when they kill, should be executed for their crimes. They must serve as examples so that others will think long and hard before committing a crime or an act of violence." "A well-educated black has a tremendous advantage over a well-educated white in terms of the job market. I think sometimes a black may think they don’t have an advantage or this and that... I’ve said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I believe they do have an actual advantage." [Note: Trump, like 30% of the population, has a Bachelor\'s degree.] All that is, of course, aside from the fact that 23% of Muslims are black, as are 16% of undocumented immigrants.', ">>{bakabakablah} : I want to get off of Interesting Times' wild ride.", '>>{duffmanhb} : The only people thinking this way on the right are those who Trumps style hurts. Politically they need to distance themselves. But on the flip side many politicians are benefiting from trump so they support him.', ">>{grizzlyhardon} : China can't and doesn't desire to lead the world and neither does any other country into the world desire that. One bad president will not ruin the entire global environment. The US still has the large powerhouse industries that China lusts after like IBM, Intel, supercomputers and technology and such. The US is the global science leader, military and diplomatic power, and China has a government so triggered by the Dalai lama that they have banned images of him in public. The premise of the article is wrong.", '>>{Newlg16} : Because unlike most conspiracy theories this one actually makes logical sense.', ">>{t3ht0ast3r} : I'd forgotten about that, thanks for this beautiful little non sequitur. The Three Musketeers and The Count of Monte Cristo were some of my favorites as a kid, Dumas was an amazing author.", '>>{wutziii} : Some people want to watch the clocks fall off the wall.', '>>{pizzashill} : >> No he didn\'t. See: current situation. Yes he did. See: Reality. Go look at world opinion on the US pre Obama and during Obamas time in office. >> Irrelevant. Was staunch US ally since WW2. It\'s very relevant, I want nothing to do with them, we don\'t need them. They are a fascist dictatorship, we\'re better than they are. >> Irrelevant. NATO member now flipping bird to other NATO countries. Yet still a member of NATO that will never leave. Turkey becoming an Islamist fascist dictatorship has nothing to do with Obama. >> No they don\'t. See: SCO. Your understanding of geopolitics is very poor. Russia very much fears China. >> No it doesn\'t. See: Belt-and-road. Yes it does. See: facts. >> Obama escalated relations with Russia, and Clinton vowed to continue on that path. LOL WHAT. Every President since Reagan has tried to improve relations with Russia, it never happens. There will never be a US Russia war, period. It\'s a talking point to dupe dumb people on the internet. The US didn\'t make Russia invade Ukraine, the US didn\'t make Russia do any of this. This appeasement bullshit morons are pushing for **does not work.** I also find it hilarious republicans railed on Obama for years because he was "too soft on Russia" and now all of the sudden we\'ve gotta be friends with them! >> Yes indeed. Right, comrade. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics >> Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism, for instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics."', ">>{rollerginger} : World opinion is irrelevant, state relations matter in foreign politics. Yes, Obama lost Turkey and Philippines among others, likely thanks to similar attitude you are showing towards them. Everyone fears China's power, yet Russia is their closest partner. Pakistan nor any other country is dependent on US aid to survive. We were on war path to clash with Russia with ever-escalating tension. Trump saying he wanted to get along with Russia raised immediate conspiracy theories of him being Russian puppet. It was unimaginable by 2016. That's how close to conflict we were.", '>>{pizzashill} : >> World opinion is irrelevant, state relations matter in foreign politics. Except our relations improved, factually. >> Yes, Obama lost Turkey and Philippines among others, likely thanks to similar attitude you are showing towards them. "Obama" didn\'t do anything, can you point out which moves Obama made that caused Turkey to become a fascist dictatorship and the Philippines to put Hitler in power? >> Everyone fears China\'s power, yet Russia is their closest partner. This is just fiction, the fact that they\'re large partners is hilarious. >> Pakistan nor any other country is dependent on US aid to survive. Pakistan absolutely depends on the US. >> We were on war path to clash with Russia with ever-escalating tension. Said the comrade, for the 7000th time since 1991. Interestingly enough always around the time the west stands up to Russia and tells them they can\'t invade other countries. I wonder why that is. Sanction Russia for invading Ukraine? US TRYING TO START A WAR WITH PEACEFUL RUSSIA!! Sanction Russia for shooting down a civilian airliner? US TRYING TO START A WAR WITH PEACEFUL RUSSIA!! Sanction Russia for hacking our election? WARMONGERS, US TRYING TO START A WAR WITH PEACEFUL RUSSIA! Like god damn clockwork, every single time, since the 1990s. Stop falling for low-grade Russian propaganda, it\'s embarrassing.', ">>{cheertina} : Hell, that actually came up in an episode of West Wing. Josh specifically wondered about moving the press to the OEOB. [From the West Wing Wiki](http://westwing.wikia.com/wiki/The_Leadership_Breakfast) The Leadership Breakfast - Act II >C.J. and Sam have a discussion about Sam's proposal to move the press to the OEOB. C.J. tells him to don't even mention it again because it sends the wrong message to the country and would alienate the press. He tries a different tack with Josh and asks for a question to be added to the monthly poll about moving the press corps out of the West Wing.", ">>{atomcrafter} : Trump is aggressively killing American science and diplomacy. That's the point. I think you underestimate climate damage.", ">>{rollerginger} : No they didn't. We lost lot of allies and respect. Obama didn't put Erdogan or Duterte in power, but he lost those countries. That is the issue. No it isn't fiction. SCO exists. Pakistan doesn't depend on US aid. It isn't in famine. Irrelevant who did what. Relations with Russia are lower now than during Bush years.", '>>{pizzashill} : >> No they didn\'t. We lost lot of allies and respect. Factually incorrect, this is a straight up lie. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/24/7-charts-on-how-the-world-views-president-obama/ >> Obama didn\'t put Erdogan or Duterte in power, but he lost those countries. That is the issue. Again, can you point out what moves Obama made to "lose" these countries? >> Pakistan doesn\'t depend on US aid. It isn\'t in famine. Pakistan absolutely depends on US aid. >> Irrelevant who did what. Relations with Russia are lower now than during Bush years. You realize both Bush and Obama went out of their way to improve relations with Russia, correct? What exactly is it you think the US should do? Let Russia invade countries, hack us while we bend over/suck them off?', '>>{redroguetech} : To be clear, this is not a direct quote.', '>>{Kytyngurl2} : Why do people hate being kicked in the face? The Atlantic vows to uncover the truth!', '>>{MFoy} : I would argue his retweeting and general support of white supremacists would count as inflammatory remarks towards black Americans, but I otherwise completely agree with you.', '>>{MFoy} : Actually, he had his black guy thrown out of the rally.', ">>{rollerginger} : I said popular opinion is irrelevant in foreign politics the first time. I don't know. But he did. Pakistan doesn't depend on US aid. We don't feed them. Bush also did improve relations with Russia while Obama failed horrendously. I don't know.", ">>{Rocknrollsk} : Dude, just stop. It won't make a difference to someone who can't correctly process information. You're just going to give yourself an ulcer.", '>>{Vgatv} : this universe. They are investing in green energy, manufacturing and infrastructure. We are spending our time debating whether or not a microwave is a fucking Transformer. Pretty inevitable', ">>{Vgatv} : Our President spent weeks whining that his inauguration crowd wasn't as big as Obama's, sent his press secretary out to lie about the size of the crowd, and even tried to order the Parks department to lie about it. Now what was that about triggered?", '>>{TheMovingFinger} : >Trump prepares to pass the world leadership baton to China *Puh-leez*. Does anyone imagine the squirrel’s ass has ‘ the world leadership baton’? You’re only a leader when somebody follows.', '>>{JeremyMo88} : Oh he has one Bannon spray-painted a baton gold and wrote "Wrld best leder" on it (the "e" in best is backwards) and gave it to Trump when he won the election. Trump keeps it by his bed.', ">>{d_mcc_x} : Not to mention regressing in terms of productivity, energy, labor, human rights, healthcare, science, etc etc. Dude is taking a Ferrari that's in need of a tune up, and trashing it to buy a 66 mustang.", ">>{Vgatv} : Nah, a 66 Mustang is still a good car. He's trashing the Ferrari and buying a 73 Gremlin", '>>{thomascgalvin} : Hey now, Angela Merkel and Putin would both like a shot at that baton, thank you very much.', ">>{tank_trap} : The future is green technology and a reduction of reliance on fossil fuels. Everybody knows this except Trump and the GOP. China is making green technology the #1 priority and it is poised to become the world leader in green technology. The US green tech industry has effectively been crippled by Trump. Yes, it's true that companies like Tesla are still the leaders in their industry. However, China is competitive, or perhaps even leading the US in other green tech industries such as solar panels. Because of Trump, with less subsidies and government support for the green tech industry, US companies like Tesla, First Solar, etc, will be crippled. China is becoming the future while Trump is busy trying to resurrect the coal industry. These are sad times for the USA.", ">>{Buck-Nasty} : Sheer population and economic growth, it's a rare anomaly in world history that the countries with the largest populations have not had the largest economies. The US really doesn't stand a chance against China especially with the level of incompetence in the current leadership.", '>>{Petty-officer4} : >The Trump administration’s vision for disengagement from the world is a godsend for China. Look at Trump’s proposed budget, which would cut spending on “soft power” — diplomacy, foreign aid, international organizations — by 28 percent. *Beijing, by contrast, has tripled the budget of its foreign ministry in the past decade*. And that doesn’t include its massive spending on aid and development across Asia and Africa. Just tallying some of Beijing’s key development commitments, George Washington University’s David Shambaugh estimates the total at *$1.4 trillion*, compared with the Marshall Plan, which in today’s dollars would cost about $100 billion. $1.4 trillion?! fuck...', '>>{HowITrulyFeel} : President Trump said he was going to make America great but he is only making America weak. Horrible.', ">>{TheDivineSpirit2} : China needs globalization in order to succeed. They are just as worried about the end of globalization as we are. I wouldn't call them a Liberal country by any stretch of the imagination, but as long as they tolerate the existence of Liberalism in other nations, I think we can co-exist.", '>>{MortalBean} : Yes, the EU has been such a terrible thing to happen to Europe, remind me why they contain the countries highest quality of life of anywhere in the world?', ">>{grizzlyhardon} : Trump can't kill our science, the strength of our science is in our universities which aren't owned by the government. Students from all over the world, including China, are attracted to out universities. That is the US's strength in global science. Diplomatic ties come and go for each presidency. I think you may not understand what makes a country a global leader and that may be why you believe this article, but the bredth at which Trump can enact change doesn't span to the things you believe it does. Also, China produces more green house gases than the US. We have a deal with them in that we cut emissions, but they promise to cut emissions 20 years later.", '>>{MortalBean} : >They DID have the highest life quality, but then "The Incident" happened. Except that many countries, especially Denmark and Germany (in that they outrank us by virtually every category, so it doesn\'t matter what the index puts the most emphasis on) consistently outrank the US to this very day in quality of life indexes. Sweden has been doing just fine with the refugee crisis. No country in the EU really has been impacted that much by the crisis on a macro level. Crime hasn\'t really gone up, markets are doing fine, society is chugging by just fine. They are still happier than we are and are still living longer and more educated. The US on the other hand is in the waning days of our empire, and will probably be handing off a our position in the world to either China or Russia in the next few decades.', ">>{atomcrafter} : A sizable amount of research funding for universities comes from the government. The National Labs and the CDC and NOAA are run by the government. That funding is being attacked across the board. Those agencies are being deliberately understaffed and driven by people ideologically devoted to their destruction. Travel bans are keeping international students out. Others are staying away from this country because of the hostility that they reflect. We have no State Department. Ambassadors around the world are gone and have not been replaced. All of the top civil servants--people who have served since the Carter administration--are gone. There are no second-level political appointees. Funding is to be cut by a third. Trump has been very loud about tearing up our international deals, especially the ones that serve our own interests. Trump doesn't believe he needs to do anything about climate change. He won't honor that deal.", ">>{sir_sri} : The one where China has 4, almost 5x the population of the US, and stopped being a nation half full of illiterate peasant farmers in the 1970s. India is poorer in resources, and took longer to liberalise, but they will probably catch up or stay close to China in power later in the century. But for now, China is the obvious new global power. Yes, on a nominal basis their economy is about half the US, but on trade they are pretty close to parity (more exports, less imports but comparable). In theory the EU, which is larger in population gdp and trade than the US could take the leadership of the global stage, but they can barely organise themselves out of a paper bag right now. No one is saying China is the dominant global power today, but that is coming, rapidly. Once the average Chinese worker is 1/4 as productive and American one, they will have a larger economy, which, on a ppp basis has already happened. When they average Chinese worker is half as productive as their American counterpart China will have almost twice the economy. Catching up is easy, and China is so big it doesn't need to be as productive as the US to have the economic power. If they manage to catch up to Taiwanese levels of productivity it's going to leave the US in the dust.", '>>{turningsteel} : 66 mustang a classic. Analogy no make sense. Public service announcement.', ">>{d_mcc_x} : It's nostalgia for a time that no longer exists...", '>>{pizzashill} : >> The one where China has 4, almost 5x the population of the US, and stopped being a nation half full of illiterate peasant farmers in the 1970s. This doesn\'t mean they become the leader of the world, that isn\'t how this works. China has an absurd amount of internal strife and is still a fairly poor country considering their per capita income is significantly less than the US. >> But for now, China is the obvious new global power. Yes, on a nominal basis their economy is about half the US, but on trade they are pretty close to parity (more exports, less imports but comparable). In theory the EU, which is larger in population gdp and trade than the US could take the leadership of the global stage, but they can barely organise themselves out of a paper bag right now. Global power in what? They\'re losing in pretty much every area. Also, your argument here is weird, the goal of trade isn\'t really exports, that isn\'t a good thing. I think this says it best. http://bernard.pitzer.edu/~lyamane/poptrade.html >> "Competing in the world marketplace": One of the most popular, enduring misconceptions of practical men is that countries are in competition with each other in the same way that companies in the same business are in competition. Ricardo already knew better in 1817. An introductory economics course should drive home to students the point that international trade is not about competition, it is about mutually beneficial exchange. Even more fundamentally, we should be able to teach students that imports, not exports, are the purpose of trade. That is, what a country gains from trade is the ability to import things it wants. Exports are not an objective in and of themselves: the need to export is a burden that a country must bear because its import suppliers are crass enough to demand payment. Another interesting thing here is: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/265cd8fb02fb44a69cf0eaa2063e11d9/mexico-taking-us-factory-jobs-blame-robots-instead >> In a survey by the consulting firm Deloitte, global manufacturing executives predicted that that the United States — now No. 2 — will overtake China as the most competitive country in manufacturing by 2020. (Competitiveness is measured by such factors as costs, productivity and the protection of intellectual property.) The Reshoring Initiative, a nonprofit that lobbies manufacturers to return jobs to the United States, says America was losing an average of 220,000 net jobs a year to other countries a decade ago. Now, the number being moved abroad is roughly offset by the number that are coming back or being created by foreign investment. so yeah. >> No one is saying China is the dominant global power today, but that is coming, rapidly. Once the average Chinese worker is 1/4 as productive and American one, they will have a larger economy, which, on a ppp basis has already happened. When they average Chinese worker is half as productive as their American counterpart China will have almost twice the economy. I\'m sure their economy, at some point, will become larger than the US economy, but that isn\'t enough to make them the "dominant global power" really. Many other factors go into this, the reality is China is a very long ways off from being a real global threat. The fact they aren\'t a democracy alone is going to cause extreme strife.', ">>{innni} : No, he's taking a $54 dry aged steak, cooking it well done and adding ketchup.", '>>{all_fridays_matter} : China is moving toward capitalism so I will agree. However once they start moving towards communist laws they will plummet again.', '>>{CajunBindlestiff} : National Geographic guide here: you forget all the cultural genocide (Uyghur, Tibetans) reeducation camps, and massive amount of pollution going on there. We stoped taking clients to some parts of China because of health and safety concerns. China is a shithole, fuck that country, they are not leading any world you would want to live in.', '>>{sir_sri} : >This doesn\'t mean they become the leader of the world, that isn\'t how this works. China has an absurd amount of internal strife and is still a fairly poor country considering their per capita income is significantly less than the US. There\'s no such thing as an actual leader of the world. China will dominate discussion as their trade (imports and exports) are more and more important. In many respects it doesn\'t matter whether they are imports or exports, if you are selling things to china you need to cut deals with china, and if you want access to chinese exports (because they\'re cheap) you need to make deals with china. Total trade (either imports or exports) translates to influence. >Global power in what? They\'re losing in pretty much every area. Also, your argument here is weird, the goal of trade isn\'t really exports, that isn\'t a good thing. Exports are certainly a good thing, that gets you money to import something else that you can\'t make yourself, or can\'t make as efficiently yourself. >Another interesting thing here is: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/265cd8fb02fb44a69cf0eaa2063e11d9/mexico-taking-us-factory-jobs-blame-robots-instead Robots make workers more productive... and what? The chinese will buy robots and make chinese workers more productive, mexicans will buy robots and make mexican workers more productive, americans will buy robots and make american workers more productive. What\'s your point? Jobs aren\'t a zero sum game. More productive workers means more consumption which means more demand etc. China isn\'t stealing jobs from the US, nor does it need to. No more than the US didn\'t \'steal\' all the jobs from britain in the 1920\'s if they did britain would have spent the last century with mass unemployment, which isn\'t what happened. Eventually more people doing more work gets you more influence. >I\'m sure their economy, at some point, will become larger than the US economy, but that isn\'t enough to make them the "dominant global power" really. Sure it is. I\'ll grant you right now they certainly aren\'t. But it\'s coming, rapidly. The US has influence on global policy matters because everyone wants to buy and sell with the US. When the chinese economy is roughly the same size as the US (which it is) the Chinese are, at best, roughly as influential as the US. When the Chinese economy is twice the size as the US, and when trade with China is twice as valuable as trade with the US countries will, given the choice, favour Chinese interests over US ones, because there\'s more money to be made. >Many other factors go into this, the reality is China is a very long ways off from being a real global threat. The fact they aren\'t a democracy alone is going to cause extreme strife. Ironically, it is their lack of democracy that has put them ahead of india, considering they were at comparable points in the 1960\'s (China did have a distinct advantage in the 1940\'s and 50\'s though, but their communist incompetence set them back). Also, who said anything about threat? Sure, one of these days we\'re going to wake up from an announcement from the chinese communist party that they\'re going to build the most powerful military in the world and the US won\'t have any reasonable way to keep up with their spending. But that comes from economic power, and won\'t happen until they can afford it. China is using all of those exports which are \'clearly undesirable\', to get cash they can use to buy equipment and technology they cannot make themselves. To buy influence in countries around the world that will supply them with the materials they need for whatever they are trying to do domestically etc. It\'s not like the US is going to get weaker as such. It\'s that China is going to get stronger faster than the US, and eventually overtake, because, inevitably, with the much larger labour force the Chinese are going to buy more, sell more, make more, and do more, and everyone else is going to want to buy Chinese stuff and sell the chinese stuff. The idea that a non democratic state can\'t be a threat is nonsense. The Nazi\'s and the Soviets were the greatest threats of the last century, and weren\'t democratic. The German Empire, The British and Japanese were all major global players through their use of Empire and were only sort of democratic. What gets you global influence and leadership? Everyone going along with what you want, or favouring your interests over someone else. How do you get that? Military force if needed (as per the article, the Chinese have the largest peacekeeping army now, larger than the next 4 largest combined), they have the second largest defence budget globally. And they have, depending on how you count the EU, second or 3rd largest total trade in the world and it\'s growing much more rapidly than the US. Naturally, the point with Trump is that by retreating from international power the Chinese will fill the void faster than if the US remained globally involved, but it\'s not like the US will be able to keep up. There are about 800 million workers in china, and 157 million in the US. They\'re going to demand access to resources and to a global world that does what they want, it\'s not happening tomorrow, but it\'s coming soon.', '>>{SurpriseHanging} : > Everybody knows this except Trump and the GOP Oh they know. They are trying to squeeze as much money out of oil as possible before they are no longer profitable.', ">>{Vgatv} : Actually it is. Even before Trump got in, the Chinese were investing heavily in those areas and the GOP in this country was doing everything they could to prevent us from moving forward. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the trend lines there", ">>{KageStar} : But the car exist and is still of value when restored properly, unlike the social structure of the era it's from.", '>>{row_guy} : No none of that was inevitable without this presidency. Even The Evil Hillary Clinton was going to invest in renewable industries and stay in the Paris accord. But you know Goldman Sachs speeches and emails something something.', '>>{Vgatv} : It was inevitable, although with Clinton the handover date would have been further out. Trump just accelerated it.', ">>{row_guy} : Yes but the dems want to continue that race and invest even more after Obama's very significant investments. But you know both parties are the same and so on.", ">>{Dongalor} : > The Trump administration does want a bigger military. But that has never been how China has sought to compete with U.S. power. Chinese leaders have pointed out to me that this was the Soviet strategy during the Cold War, one that failed miserably. The implication was: Let Washington waste resources on the Pentagon, while Beijing would focus on economics, technology and soft power. This is why. We're still caught up on slapping everyone with our nuts and trying to maintain hegemony, and China is investing in the future.", '>>{Firstclass30} : The Chinese has blown themselves a bubble that will need to pop. Civil unrest, student protests, angry veterans. These are all problems that are becoming more difficult for the CCP to handle. They WILL fall this century. There is no doubt about it. The current Chinese manipulation of their economy, the increasing lack of faith in the government will break them.', ">>{d_mcc_x} : The mechanics of it will never compare to the most current technology. You're still driving around an old machine.", ">>{Vgatv} : We have an orange reality tv show host who doesn't even understand what the debt ceiling is. Pretty sure we are going to hit rock bottom before the Chinese do.", ">>{Oh_Ma_Gawd} : Boy is the world in store for a new world of suck. China doesn't give a crap about anyone but China. They are one of the least Charitable countries in the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Giving_Index", ">>{pingieking} : Exactly. This wasn't inevitable. It was a conscious choice by the American people to forfeit the contest. I am willing to bet that if the US turned its national policies towards green energy and innovation that they would be able to outperform China, but they didn't even want to try.", ">>{pingieking} : Given that even the CCP isn't communist in ideology, why do you think that they will move towards communist laws?", ">>{all_fridays_matter} : There were there before. It's nor proof, but it shoes they are willing to do it. Of course this segment will lose its strength the more time that passes.", '>>{pingieking} : There is no way that the Chinese people would allow them to do that. They would be publicly executed if they tried.', '>>{jugenbund} : Wow, so much pro China propaganda lately. People are literally siding with North Korea and China because of Trump. The left is going insane.', '>>{jugenbund} : We don\'t need government subsidies for green energy! Once it becomes profitable to invest in it the free market will do all the work. Why do you think China has suddenly started supporting it after decades of being the worlds top polluter with virtually zero safety and environmental regulations? Because it\'s becoming clear it is a worthwhile investment. This "China super power" meme is ridiculous. They will invest in clean energy and so will many other countries, especially the USA. You don\'t need the government to dig its hands into something the free market will solve. Forcing clean energy into the market before it\'s due only hurts us and benefits China, who is fully exploiting fossil fuels until clean energy becomes viable', '>>{jugenbund} : One day old account. 100% anti-Trump spam. Really makes you think.', '>>{MisterBurkes} : We spent $14 trillion on wars, the best form of diplomacy and 10x the spend is so strong. /s']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{truthhurts4444} : Donald Trump hasn't made any offensive or inflammatory remarks about black Americans. But as a whole, black Americans react strongly toward any racial aggression directed toward other minorities. This is a result of generations of institutionalized and systemic racism aimed at black Americans, they know what it feels like to be the target of discrimination", '>>{Sidwill} : No, while they are it it why not explain why water is wet.', '>>{as_a_black_guy} : Not really. From shitty housing scandals to being the king of the birthers, there\'s nothing in the record that says "hey, take a shot on this trump guy, especially, because he\'d be great for black people"', '>>{miashaee} : He did spread some neo-nazi propoganda against us with stereotypical black "thug" imagery and false murder stats with respect to black on white murders (much higher than the actual number) and white on black murders (a bit lower than the actual number). I mean that alone was enough to make me say "hey this guy might be racially biased against me due to my race". That\'s not the only thing that gives me pause with Trump with respect to black people but that is something that stands out. Also yeah the dog whistle stuff against other minority groups made it so I wouldn\'t vote for Trump, mostly because yeah I know what that is. The same reason he is loathed by black people is the same reason that he has so many neo-nazi supporters, a clear and consistent anti-minority undertone.', '>>{IbanezDavy} : But he had *his* black guy at *a* rally.', ">>{Brady_55} : Surprisingly insightful comment from you. You're totally right here.", ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : Because of the same reason they rejected McCain and Romney. They're Republicans.", '>>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : Because his campaign is run by racists? Because his policies are racist? Because he has a long, long, history of racism in his business and personal life?', ">>{Dingus-ate-your-baby} : I'm gonna go out on a limb and posit that his suspicion that the first black President was born in Kenya probably hurt him in this demographic. EDIT: Oh! And that he founded ISIS. The man has said so much crazy shit it's hard to keep track sometimes.", '>>{miashaee} : Not entirely, there is a stronger element of bigotry and racism from the Trump camp than in the McCain or Romney camps to the point that I could never support him. With McCain and Romney given the right policy proposals and a softer tone on social issues I could have supported them. I mean I have been to McCain and Romney rallies before, but I REFUSE to go to a Trump rally because it can be a safespace for many bigots. Not risking my safety.', '>>{JacobCrim88} : Not at all. Must be a slow day at The Atlantic.', '>>{ozabelle} : could write a book using trump\'s campaign: "how to offend almost everybody without even trying"', '>>{DebussySIMiami} : McCain actually refuted a supporter at his rally who said Obama is an Arab terrorist. Trump encourages and even helps spread such lies. The difference is night and day.', ">>{redroguetech} : Let me count the ways. I hate love thee to the depth and breadth and height My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight For the ends of being and ideal grace. I hate thee to the level of every day's Most quiet need, by sun and candle-light. I hate thee freely, as men strive for right.", ">>{Anal_Vacuum} : And McCain still had almost no black support. I don't care for the reason, but black Americans will not vote Republican. Jesus could run as a Republican and would still get 5% of the black vote", '>>{darkshark21} : Can he talk to a majority Black audience first? The NAACP gave him a platform for free and he declined. Now he has to listen to the prominent Black supporters he does have, but other members of his campaign seem to disregard their inputs.', '>>{BoogerPresley} : “I have black guys counting my money. … I hate it. The only guys I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes all day.” (USA Today, May 20, 1991)', ">>{BigFatHairyBalls} : Why won't they just hear him out. I mean...all of them are poor, their life sucks, they are terrible people, they have no jobs, everybody hates them, they suck, fuck them, Yada yada. Why *not* vote for Trump? -Trump surrogates", '>>{redroguetech} : > Donald Trump hasn\'t made any offensive or inflammatory remarks about black Americans. "There\'s no such thing as racism anymore. We\'ve had a black president so it\'s not a question anymore. Are they saying blacks lives should matter more than white lives or Asian lives? If Black Lives Matter, then go back to Africa? We\'ll see how much they matter there." "Sadly, because president Obama has done such a poor job as president, you won’t see another black president for generations!" According to John O’Donnell, "And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day... I think [John O’Donnell] is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control." "One of the first things I’d do in terms of executive order if I win would be to sign a strong, strong statement that will go out to the country, out to the world, that anybody caught killing a policeman, policewoman, police officer, anybody killing a police officer: death penalty. It’s gonna happen. OK? We can’t let this go." "Mayor [Ed] Koch has stated that hate and rancor should be removed from our hearts. I do not think so. I want to hate these muggers and murderers. They should be forced to suffer and, when they kill, should be executed for their crimes. They must serve as examples so that others will think long and hard before committing a crime or an act of violence." "A well-educated black has a tremendous advantage over a well-educated white in terms of the job market. I think sometimes a black may think they don’t have an advantage or this and that... I’ve said on one occasion, even about myself, if I were starting off today, I would love to be a well-educated black, because I believe they do have an actual advantage." [Note: Trump, like 30% of the population, has a Bachelor\'s degree.] All that is, of course, aside from the fact that 23% of Muslims are black, as are 16% of undocumented immigrants.', '>>{redroguetech} : To be clear, this is not a direct quote.', '>>{Kytyngurl2} : Why do people hate being kicked in the face? The Atlantic vows to uncover the truth!', '>>{MFoy} : I would argue his retweeting and general support of white supremacists would count as inflammatory remarks towards black Americans, but I otherwise completely agree with you.', '>>{MFoy} : Actually, he had his black guy thrown out of the rally.'], ['>>{NateGrey} : > Humphrey, a strong critic of the GOP nominee, wrote a letter Tuesday to New Hampshire\'s three representatives to the Republican National Committee encouraging them to take the party\'s nominee off the ticket. He argued that Trump\'s comments at a rally earlier Tuesday, where he appeared to joke about gun owners taking action against Hillary Clinton. was "the last straw." More people should be feeling this way.', ">>{Matues49} : InB4 Mr. Humphrey 'gets stopped' by second amendment folks,", '>>{Puffin_fan} : Too late for Harambe. And the sad thing is, he probably had a better temperment. Certainly more qualified. Just a little short in experience side. His hands would have been big enough ?', '>>{BrawndoTTM} : There is no mechanism whatsoever by which to do this. The only way would be to somehow get literally the most self-confident man in the entire world to voluntarily step down somehow.', ">>{pengins4life} : Its much much too late for that, the GOP made their bed and now they need to lie in it. The most they could possibly do atm, is grow a spine and stop supporting Trump. Of course we know that isn't going to happen for a great many GOP Congress people like Paul Ryan.", '>>{dyzo-blue} : There is no law. The parties are private institutions and can do anything they damn well please.', '>>{roleparadise} : Yes there is. Rule 9 of the national GOP rules. They could declare him mentally unfit and/or a national security threat and have him removed and replaced.', ">>{moxy801} : >There is no law If that is even so, the RNC must have rules for this, I am sure they cannot just 'do anything they damn well please'.", '>>{dyzo-blue} : > The Republican Party rules states that “the Republican National Committee is hereby authorized and empowered to fill any and all vacancies which may occur by reason of death, declination, or otherwise of the Republican candidate for President of the United States or the Republican candidate for Vice President of the United States.” The "otherwise" means "anything they damn well please".', '>>{duffmanhb} : The only people thinking this way on the right are those who Trumps style hurts. Politically they need to distance themselves. But on the flip side many politicians are benefiting from trump so they support him.'], ['>>{cmit} : Trump prepares to pass the world leadership baton to China', ">>{anti-pope} : Let's see of 'other' powers within the US let this happen.", ">>{las0m} : It's inevitable that this transition would occur sometime this century, Trump is just moving up the timetable.", ">>{rollerginger} : China has had it for a good while now. EU is in chaos and Obama-Clinton administration created lots of enemies outside now largely defunct EU. Those countries China has now collected under its own aegis (see: Philippines, Turkey, Russia, Pakistan, bunch of African and South-American states). Clinton would have likely triggered war with Russia over that, let's see what Trump will do. Best thing to do is yield and reorganize at this point.", ">>{pizzashill} : I'm not sure in what universe you thought this was inevitable.", '>>{trump_meth_cult} : Trump is such a foul disgusting piece of unintelligent racist trash, america is truly finished after promoting this sleezy conman.', ">>{pizzashill} : LOL WHAT, where do we even start with this comment. >> Obama-Clinton administration You mean the Bush admin? Obama repaired most of our relationships. >> Philippines A disgusting country run bu Hitler JR? >> Turkey An Islamist fascist dictatorship that depends on NATO for defense from Russia? >> Russia At no point have we been friends with Russia, not only that, Russia views China as a serious threat. >> Pakistan Considering this is another country that depends on US aid I'm not sure what world you're living in. >> Clinton would have likely triggered war with Russia over that A literal Russian propaganda talking point they've been spamming since the 1990s. >> Best thing to do is yield and reorganize at this point. Of course it is, comrade.", ">>{rollerginger} : >You mean the Bush admin? Obama repaired most of our relationships. No he didn't. See: current situation. >A disgusting country run bu Hitler JR? Irrelevant. Was staunch US ally since WW2. >An Islamist fascist dictatorship that depends on NATO for defense from Russia? Irrelevant. NATO member now flipping bird to other NATO countries. >At no point have we been friends with Russia, not only that, Russia views China as a serious threat. Yes we were. Dubaya thawed relations considerably. No they don't. See: SCO. >Considering this is another country that depends on US aid I'm not sure what world you're living in. No it doesn't. See: Belt-and-road. >A literal Russian propaganda talking point they've been spamming since the 1990s. Obama escalated relations with Russia, and Clinton vowed to continue on that path. >Of course it is, comrade. Yes indeed.", ">>{grizzlyhardon} : China can't and doesn't desire to lead the world and neither does any other country into the world desire that. One bad president will not ruin the entire global environment. The US still has the large powerhouse industries that China lusts after like IBM, Intel, supercomputers and technology and such. The US is the global science leader, military and diplomatic power, and China has a government so triggered by the Dalai lama that they have banned images of him in public. The premise of the article is wrong.", '>>{pizzashill} : >> No he didn\'t. See: current situation. Yes he did. See: Reality. Go look at world opinion on the US pre Obama and during Obamas time in office. >> Irrelevant. Was staunch US ally since WW2. It\'s very relevant, I want nothing to do with them, we don\'t need them. They are a fascist dictatorship, we\'re better than they are. >> Irrelevant. NATO member now flipping bird to other NATO countries. Yet still a member of NATO that will never leave. Turkey becoming an Islamist fascist dictatorship has nothing to do with Obama. >> No they don\'t. See: SCO. Your understanding of geopolitics is very poor. Russia very much fears China. >> No it doesn\'t. See: Belt-and-road. Yes it does. See: facts. >> Obama escalated relations with Russia, and Clinton vowed to continue on that path. LOL WHAT. Every President since Reagan has tried to improve relations with Russia, it never happens. There will never be a US Russia war, period. It\'s a talking point to dupe dumb people on the internet. The US didn\'t make Russia invade Ukraine, the US didn\'t make Russia do any of this. This appeasement bullshit morons are pushing for **does not work.** I also find it hilarious republicans railed on Obama for years because he was "too soft on Russia" and now all of the sudden we\'ve gotta be friends with them! >> Yes indeed. Right, comrade. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics >> Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism, for instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics."', ">>{rollerginger} : World opinion is irrelevant, state relations matter in foreign politics. Yes, Obama lost Turkey and Philippines among others, likely thanks to similar attitude you are showing towards them. Everyone fears China's power, yet Russia is their closest partner. Pakistan nor any other country is dependent on US aid to survive. We were on war path to clash with Russia with ever-escalating tension. Trump saying he wanted to get along with Russia raised immediate conspiracy theories of him being Russian puppet. It was unimaginable by 2016. That's how close to conflict we were.", '>>{pizzashill} : >> World opinion is irrelevant, state relations matter in foreign politics. Except our relations improved, factually. >> Yes, Obama lost Turkey and Philippines among others, likely thanks to similar attitude you are showing towards them. "Obama" didn\'t do anything, can you point out which moves Obama made that caused Turkey to become a fascist dictatorship and the Philippines to put Hitler in power? >> Everyone fears China\'s power, yet Russia is their closest partner. This is just fiction, the fact that they\'re large partners is hilarious. >> Pakistan nor any other country is dependent on US aid to survive. Pakistan absolutely depends on the US. >> We were on war path to clash with Russia with ever-escalating tension. Said the comrade, for the 7000th time since 1991. Interestingly enough always around the time the west stands up to Russia and tells them they can\'t invade other countries. I wonder why that is. Sanction Russia for invading Ukraine? US TRYING TO START A WAR WITH PEACEFUL RUSSIA!! Sanction Russia for shooting down a civilian airliner? US TRYING TO START A WAR WITH PEACEFUL RUSSIA!! Sanction Russia for hacking our election? WARMONGERS, US TRYING TO START A WAR WITH PEACEFUL RUSSIA! Like god damn clockwork, every single time, since the 1990s. Stop falling for low-grade Russian propaganda, it\'s embarrassing.', ">>{atomcrafter} : Trump is aggressively killing American science and diplomacy. That's the point. I think you underestimate climate damage.", ">>{rollerginger} : No they didn't. We lost lot of allies and respect. Obama didn't put Erdogan or Duterte in power, but he lost those countries. That is the issue. No it isn't fiction. SCO exists. Pakistan doesn't depend on US aid. It isn't in famine. Irrelevant who did what. Relations with Russia are lower now than during Bush years.", '>>{pizzashill} : >> No they didn\'t. We lost lot of allies and respect. Factually incorrect, this is a straight up lie. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/24/7-charts-on-how-the-world-views-president-obama/ >> Obama didn\'t put Erdogan or Duterte in power, but he lost those countries. That is the issue. Again, can you point out what moves Obama made to "lose" these countries? >> Pakistan doesn\'t depend on US aid. It isn\'t in famine. Pakistan absolutely depends on US aid. >> Irrelevant who did what. Relations with Russia are lower now than during Bush years. You realize both Bush and Obama went out of their way to improve relations with Russia, correct? What exactly is it you think the US should do? Let Russia invade countries, hack us while we bend over/suck them off?', ">>{rollerginger} : I said popular opinion is irrelevant in foreign politics the first time. I don't know. But he did. Pakistan doesn't depend on US aid. We don't feed them. Bush also did improve relations with Russia while Obama failed horrendously. I don't know.", ">>{Rocknrollsk} : Dude, just stop. It won't make a difference to someone who can't correctly process information. You're just going to give yourself an ulcer.", '>>{Vgatv} : this universe. They are investing in green energy, manufacturing and infrastructure. We are spending our time debating whether or not a microwave is a fucking Transformer. Pretty inevitable', ">>{Vgatv} : Our President spent weeks whining that his inauguration crowd wasn't as big as Obama's, sent his press secretary out to lie about the size of the crowd, and even tried to order the Parks department to lie about it. Now what was that about triggered?", '>>{TheMovingFinger} : >Trump prepares to pass the world leadership baton to China *Puh-leez*. Does anyone imagine the squirrel’s ass has ‘ the world leadership baton’? You’re only a leader when somebody follows.', '>>{JeremyMo88} : Oh he has one Bannon spray-painted a baton gold and wrote "Wrld best leder" on it (the "e" in best is backwards) and gave it to Trump when he won the election. Trump keeps it by his bed.', ">>{d_mcc_x} : Not to mention regressing in terms of productivity, energy, labor, human rights, healthcare, science, etc etc. Dude is taking a Ferrari that's in need of a tune up, and trashing it to buy a 66 mustang.", ">>{Vgatv} : Nah, a 66 Mustang is still a good car. He's trashing the Ferrari and buying a 73 Gremlin", '>>{thomascgalvin} : Hey now, Angela Merkel and Putin would both like a shot at that baton, thank you very much.', ">>{tank_trap} : The future is green technology and a reduction of reliance on fossil fuels. Everybody knows this except Trump and the GOP. China is making green technology the #1 priority and it is poised to become the world leader in green technology. The US green tech industry has effectively been crippled by Trump. Yes, it's true that companies like Tesla are still the leaders in their industry. However, China is competitive, or perhaps even leading the US in other green tech industries such as solar panels. Because of Trump, with less subsidies and government support for the green tech industry, US companies like Tesla, First Solar, etc, will be crippled. China is becoming the future while Trump is busy trying to resurrect the coal industry. These are sad times for the USA.", ">>{Buck-Nasty} : Sheer population and economic growth, it's a rare anomaly in world history that the countries with the largest populations have not had the largest economies. The US really doesn't stand a chance against China especially with the level of incompetence in the current leadership.", '>>{Petty-officer4} : >The Trump administration’s vision for disengagement from the world is a godsend for China. Look at Trump’s proposed budget, which would cut spending on “soft power” — diplomacy, foreign aid, international organizations — by 28 percent. *Beijing, by contrast, has tripled the budget of its foreign ministry in the past decade*. And that doesn’t include its massive spending on aid and development across Asia and Africa. Just tallying some of Beijing’s key development commitments, George Washington University’s David Shambaugh estimates the total at *$1.4 trillion*, compared with the Marshall Plan, which in today’s dollars would cost about $100 billion. $1.4 trillion?! fuck...', '>>{HowITrulyFeel} : President Trump said he was going to make America great but he is only making America weak. Horrible.', ">>{TheDivineSpirit2} : China needs globalization in order to succeed. They are just as worried about the end of globalization as we are. I wouldn't call them a Liberal country by any stretch of the imagination, but as long as they tolerate the existence of Liberalism in other nations, I think we can co-exist.", '>>{MortalBean} : Yes, the EU has been such a terrible thing to happen to Europe, remind me why they contain the countries highest quality of life of anywhere in the world?', ">>{grizzlyhardon} : Trump can't kill our science, the strength of our science is in our universities which aren't owned by the government. Students from all over the world, including China, are attracted to out universities. That is the US's strength in global science. Diplomatic ties come and go for each presidency. I think you may not understand what makes a country a global leader and that may be why you believe this article, but the bredth at which Trump can enact change doesn't span to the things you believe it does. Also, China produces more green house gases than the US. We have a deal with them in that we cut emissions, but they promise to cut emissions 20 years later.", '>>{MortalBean} : >They DID have the highest life quality, but then "The Incident" happened. Except that many countries, especially Denmark and Germany (in that they outrank us by virtually every category, so it doesn\'t matter what the index puts the most emphasis on) consistently outrank the US to this very day in quality of life indexes. Sweden has been doing just fine with the refugee crisis. No country in the EU really has been impacted that much by the crisis on a macro level. Crime hasn\'t really gone up, markets are doing fine, society is chugging by just fine. They are still happier than we are and are still living longer and more educated. The US on the other hand is in the waning days of our empire, and will probably be handing off a our position in the world to either China or Russia in the next few decades.', ">>{atomcrafter} : A sizable amount of research funding for universities comes from the government. The National Labs and the CDC and NOAA are run by the government. That funding is being attacked across the board. Those agencies are being deliberately understaffed and driven by people ideologically devoted to their destruction. Travel bans are keeping international students out. Others are staying away from this country because of the hostility that they reflect. We have no State Department. Ambassadors around the world are gone and have not been replaced. All of the top civil servants--people who have served since the Carter administration--are gone. There are no second-level political appointees. Funding is to be cut by a third. Trump has been very loud about tearing up our international deals, especially the ones that serve our own interests. Trump doesn't believe he needs to do anything about climate change. He won't honor that deal.", ">>{sir_sri} : The one where China has 4, almost 5x the population of the US, and stopped being a nation half full of illiterate peasant farmers in the 1970s. India is poorer in resources, and took longer to liberalise, but they will probably catch up or stay close to China in power later in the century. But for now, China is the obvious new global power. Yes, on a nominal basis their economy is about half the US, but on trade they are pretty close to parity (more exports, less imports but comparable). In theory the EU, which is larger in population gdp and trade than the US could take the leadership of the global stage, but they can barely organise themselves out of a paper bag right now. No one is saying China is the dominant global power today, but that is coming, rapidly. Once the average Chinese worker is 1/4 as productive and American one, they will have a larger economy, which, on a ppp basis has already happened. When they average Chinese worker is half as productive as their American counterpart China will have almost twice the economy. Catching up is easy, and China is so big it doesn't need to be as productive as the US to have the economic power. If they manage to catch up to Taiwanese levels of productivity it's going to leave the US in the dust.", '>>{turningsteel} : 66 mustang a classic. Analogy no make sense. Public service announcement.', ">>{d_mcc_x} : It's nostalgia for a time that no longer exists...", '>>{pizzashill} : >> The one where China has 4, almost 5x the population of the US, and stopped being a nation half full of illiterate peasant farmers in the 1970s. This doesn\'t mean they become the leader of the world, that isn\'t how this works. China has an absurd amount of internal strife and is still a fairly poor country considering their per capita income is significantly less than the US. >> But for now, China is the obvious new global power. Yes, on a nominal basis their economy is about half the US, but on trade they are pretty close to parity (more exports, less imports but comparable). In theory the EU, which is larger in population gdp and trade than the US could take the leadership of the global stage, but they can barely organise themselves out of a paper bag right now. Global power in what? They\'re losing in pretty much every area. Also, your argument here is weird, the goal of trade isn\'t really exports, that isn\'t a good thing. I think this says it best. http://bernard.pitzer.edu/~lyamane/poptrade.html >> "Competing in the world marketplace": One of the most popular, enduring misconceptions of practical men is that countries are in competition with each other in the same way that companies in the same business are in competition. Ricardo already knew better in 1817. An introductory economics course should drive home to students the point that international trade is not about competition, it is about mutually beneficial exchange. Even more fundamentally, we should be able to teach students that imports, not exports, are the purpose of trade. That is, what a country gains from trade is the ability to import things it wants. Exports are not an objective in and of themselves: the need to export is a burden that a country must bear because its import suppliers are crass enough to demand payment. Another interesting thing here is: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/265cd8fb02fb44a69cf0eaa2063e11d9/mexico-taking-us-factory-jobs-blame-robots-instead >> In a survey by the consulting firm Deloitte, global manufacturing executives predicted that that the United States — now No. 2 — will overtake China as the most competitive country in manufacturing by 2020. (Competitiveness is measured by such factors as costs, productivity and the protection of intellectual property.) The Reshoring Initiative, a nonprofit that lobbies manufacturers to return jobs to the United States, says America was losing an average of 220,000 net jobs a year to other countries a decade ago. Now, the number being moved abroad is roughly offset by the number that are coming back or being created by foreign investment. so yeah. >> No one is saying China is the dominant global power today, but that is coming, rapidly. Once the average Chinese worker is 1/4 as productive and American one, they will have a larger economy, which, on a ppp basis has already happened. When they average Chinese worker is half as productive as their American counterpart China will have almost twice the economy. I\'m sure their economy, at some point, will become larger than the US economy, but that isn\'t enough to make them the "dominant global power" really. Many other factors go into this, the reality is China is a very long ways off from being a real global threat. The fact they aren\'t a democracy alone is going to cause extreme strife.', ">>{innni} : No, he's taking a $54 dry aged steak, cooking it well done and adding ketchup.", '>>{all_fridays_matter} : China is moving toward capitalism so I will agree. However once they start moving towards communist laws they will plummet again.', '>>{CajunBindlestiff} : National Geographic guide here: you forget all the cultural genocide (Uyghur, Tibetans) reeducation camps, and massive amount of pollution going on there. We stoped taking clients to some parts of China because of health and safety concerns. China is a shithole, fuck that country, they are not leading any world you would want to live in.', '>>{sir_sri} : >This doesn\'t mean they become the leader of the world, that isn\'t how this works. China has an absurd amount of internal strife and is still a fairly poor country considering their per capita income is significantly less than the US. There\'s no such thing as an actual leader of the world. China will dominate discussion as their trade (imports and exports) are more and more important. In many respects it doesn\'t matter whether they are imports or exports, if you are selling things to china you need to cut deals with china, and if you want access to chinese exports (because they\'re cheap) you need to make deals with china. Total trade (either imports or exports) translates to influence. >Global power in what? They\'re losing in pretty much every area. Also, your argument here is weird, the goal of trade isn\'t really exports, that isn\'t a good thing. Exports are certainly a good thing, that gets you money to import something else that you can\'t make yourself, or can\'t make as efficiently yourself. >Another interesting thing here is: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/265cd8fb02fb44a69cf0eaa2063e11d9/mexico-taking-us-factory-jobs-blame-robots-instead Robots make workers more productive... and what? The chinese will buy robots and make chinese workers more productive, mexicans will buy robots and make mexican workers more productive, americans will buy robots and make american workers more productive. What\'s your point? Jobs aren\'t a zero sum game. More productive workers means more consumption which means more demand etc. China isn\'t stealing jobs from the US, nor does it need to. No more than the US didn\'t \'steal\' all the jobs from britain in the 1920\'s if they did britain would have spent the last century with mass unemployment, which isn\'t what happened. Eventually more people doing more work gets you more influence. >I\'m sure their economy, at some point, will become larger than the US economy, but that isn\'t enough to make them the "dominant global power" really. Sure it is. I\'ll grant you right now they certainly aren\'t. But it\'s coming, rapidly. The US has influence on global policy matters because everyone wants to buy and sell with the US. When the chinese economy is roughly the same size as the US (which it is) the Chinese are, at best, roughly as influential as the US. When the Chinese economy is twice the size as the US, and when trade with China is twice as valuable as trade with the US countries will, given the choice, favour Chinese interests over US ones, because there\'s more money to be made. >Many other factors go into this, the reality is China is a very long ways off from being a real global threat. The fact they aren\'t a democracy alone is going to cause extreme strife. Ironically, it is their lack of democracy that has put them ahead of india, considering they were at comparable points in the 1960\'s (China did have a distinct advantage in the 1940\'s and 50\'s though, but their communist incompetence set them back). Also, who said anything about threat? Sure, one of these days we\'re going to wake up from an announcement from the chinese communist party that they\'re going to build the most powerful military in the world and the US won\'t have any reasonable way to keep up with their spending. But that comes from economic power, and won\'t happen until they can afford it. China is using all of those exports which are \'clearly undesirable\', to get cash they can use to buy equipment and technology they cannot make themselves. To buy influence in countries around the world that will supply them with the materials they need for whatever they are trying to do domestically etc. It\'s not like the US is going to get weaker as such. It\'s that China is going to get stronger faster than the US, and eventually overtake, because, inevitably, with the much larger labour force the Chinese are going to buy more, sell more, make more, and do more, and everyone else is going to want to buy Chinese stuff and sell the chinese stuff. The idea that a non democratic state can\'t be a threat is nonsense. The Nazi\'s and the Soviets were the greatest threats of the last century, and weren\'t democratic. The German Empire, The British and Japanese were all major global players through their use of Empire and were only sort of democratic. What gets you global influence and leadership? Everyone going along with what you want, or favouring your interests over someone else. How do you get that? Military force if needed (as per the article, the Chinese have the largest peacekeeping army now, larger than the next 4 largest combined), they have the second largest defence budget globally. And they have, depending on how you count the EU, second or 3rd largest total trade in the world and it\'s growing much more rapidly than the US. Naturally, the point with Trump is that by retreating from international power the Chinese will fill the void faster than if the US remained globally involved, but it\'s not like the US will be able to keep up. There are about 800 million workers in china, and 157 million in the US. They\'re going to demand access to resources and to a global world that does what they want, it\'s not happening tomorrow, but it\'s coming soon.', '>>{SurpriseHanging} : > Everybody knows this except Trump and the GOP Oh they know. They are trying to squeeze as much money out of oil as possible before they are no longer profitable.', ">>{Vgatv} : Actually it is. Even before Trump got in, the Chinese were investing heavily in those areas and the GOP in this country was doing everything they could to prevent us from moving forward. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the trend lines there", ">>{KageStar} : But the car exist and is still of value when restored properly, unlike the social structure of the era it's from.", '>>{row_guy} : No none of that was inevitable without this presidency. Even The Evil Hillary Clinton was going to invest in renewable industries and stay in the Paris accord. But you know Goldman Sachs speeches and emails something something.', '>>{Vgatv} : It was inevitable, although with Clinton the handover date would have been further out. Trump just accelerated it.', ">>{row_guy} : Yes but the dems want to continue that race and invest even more after Obama's very significant investments. But you know both parties are the same and so on.", ">>{Dongalor} : > The Trump administration does want a bigger military. But that has never been how China has sought to compete with U.S. power. Chinese leaders have pointed out to me that this was the Soviet strategy during the Cold War, one that failed miserably. The implication was: Let Washington waste resources on the Pentagon, while Beijing would focus on economics, technology and soft power. This is why. We're still caught up on slapping everyone with our nuts and trying to maintain hegemony, and China is investing in the future.", '>>{Firstclass30} : The Chinese has blown themselves a bubble that will need to pop. Civil unrest, student protests, angry veterans. These are all problems that are becoming more difficult for the CCP to handle. They WILL fall this century. There is no doubt about it. The current Chinese manipulation of their economy, the increasing lack of faith in the government will break them.', ">>{d_mcc_x} : The mechanics of it will never compare to the most current technology. You're still driving around an old machine.", ">>{Vgatv} : We have an orange reality tv show host who doesn't even understand what the debt ceiling is. Pretty sure we are going to hit rock bottom before the Chinese do.", ">>{Oh_Ma_Gawd} : Boy is the world in store for a new world of suck. China doesn't give a crap about anyone but China. They are one of the least Charitable countries in the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Giving_Index", ">>{pingieking} : Exactly. This wasn't inevitable. It was a conscious choice by the American people to forfeit the contest. I am willing to bet that if the US turned its national policies towards green energy and innovation that they would be able to outperform China, but they didn't even want to try.", ">>{pingieking} : Given that even the CCP isn't communist in ideology, why do you think that they will move towards communist laws?", ">>{all_fridays_matter} : There were there before. It's nor proof, but it shoes they are willing to do it. Of course this segment will lose its strength the more time that passes.", '>>{pingieking} : There is no way that the Chinese people would allow them to do that. They would be publicly executed if they tried.', '>>{jugenbund} : Wow, so much pro China propaganda lately. People are literally siding with North Korea and China because of Trump. The left is going insane.', '>>{jugenbund} : We don\'t need government subsidies for green energy! Once it becomes profitable to invest in it the free market will do all the work. Why do you think China has suddenly started supporting it after decades of being the worlds top polluter with virtually zero safety and environmental regulations? Because it\'s becoming clear it is a worthwhile investment. This "China super power" meme is ridiculous. They will invest in clean energy and so will many other countries, especially the USA. You don\'t need the government to dig its hands into something the free market will solve. Forcing clean energy into the market before it\'s due only hurts us and benefits China, who is fully exploiting fossil fuels until clean energy becomes viable', '>>{jugenbund} : One day old account. 100% anti-Trump spam. Really makes you think.', '>>{MisterBurkes} : We spent $14 trillion on wars, the best form of diplomacy and 10x the spend is so strong. /s'], [">>{ki_no_akuma} : So.. they'll have to gather in a different room?", '>>{t3ht0ast3r} : >The White House press corps was stunned on Sunday by reports of a proposal by the Trump administration to eject reporters from their home in the West Wing — a move that, if carried out, would uproot decades of established protocol whereby journalists are allowed to work in the White House close to senior officials.', '>>{enslavedroosters} : Imagine if Obama wanted to do this 8 years ago when he was first elected. Just think of the outcry that would have occurred. They saw a dictator in Obama but Trump is just perfect. I was over in the_d yesterday and they were still going on about pizzagate and believing that to be true while mocking the "liberals" who were mentioning Trumps alleged ties in other subreddits. I can never tell if the_d users are being sarcastic or what. I\'ve found if you put them on the spot it\'s 50/50 what they will tell you. The other thing that I found curious is r/conspiracy don\'t seem to believe the Trump dossier, another Redditor mentioned that its probably the only time a conspiracy theory wasn\'t at least entertained on that subreddit. Strange times we are living in.', ">>{t3ht0ast3r} : That appears to be Reince Preibus' clarification after the news garnered an overwhelmingly negative response. At this point the story is in its infancy so there isn't much information to go on.", '>>{wutziii} : Bob Schieffer, a longtime CBS News anchor who has covered eight previous presidential administrations, said on Sunday that he was not surprised to see tensions between a new president and the news media. “They’re not the first administration that’s come to office thinking they can control every single word that’s said about them,” he said in an interview. “It’s their call, they can do what they want to do, and if the public puts up with it, they’ll continue to do it that way.” But, he added: “If they think they’re not going to get the same intense coverage, they’ve been smoking something.” Bob Schieffer or ... Bob "Chiefer"', '>>{ki_no_akuma} : from another article that was floating around: >According to three senior officials on the transition team, a plan to evict the press corps from the White House is under serious consideration by the incoming Trump Administration. If the plan goes through, one of the officials said, the media will be removed from the cozy confines of the White House press room, where it has worked for several decades. Members of the press will be relocated to the White House Conference Center—near Lafayette Square—or to a space in the Old Executive Office Building, next door to the White House. http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/a52301/trump-evict-press-white-house/ seems more like a minor inconvenience to reporters than a reason to be Alarmed.', ">>{zablyzibly} : I was just looking over the conspiracy sub this morning and noticed the same thing. This is a gigantic scandal we know very little about. It's ripe for all kinds of speculation.", ">>{zablyzibly} : They should not allow Trump to suppress the media like this. It's bullshit. They better walk back on this because it makes them look a bunch of fascist assholes.", '>>{t3ht0ast3r} : A minor inconvenience as long as everything else remains the same. That\'s a big "If".', '>>{t3ht0ast3r} : >They better walk back on this because it makes them look like a bunch of fascist assholes **even more than they already do**. FTFY', '>>{krashnburn200} : Maybe they will get moved to a fenced in "free speech zone" I I don\'t see why they should receive preferential treatment over regular citizens. Since apparently the zones are good enough for us, it\'s good enough for them.', ">>{nonamenolastname} : For those who read it (good book), Alexandre Dumas, The Three Musketeers, chapter one describes how D'Artagnan got stuck with this decrepit, good for nothing horse whose only noteworthy attribute was his unusual color: orange. History and fiction sometimes intertwine in rather unusual ways.", ">>{bakabakablah} : I want to get off of Interesting Times' wild ride.", '>>{Newlg16} : Because unlike most conspiracy theories this one actually makes logical sense.', ">>{t3ht0ast3r} : I'd forgotten about that, thanks for this beautiful little non sequitur. The Three Musketeers and The Count of Monte Cristo were some of my favorites as a kid, Dumas was an amazing author.", '>>{wutziii} : Some people want to watch the clocks fall off the wall.', ">>{cheertina} : Hell, that actually came up in an episode of West Wing. Josh specifically wondered about moving the press to the OEOB. [From the West Wing Wiki](http://westwing.wikia.com/wiki/The_Leadership_Breakfast) The Leadership Breakfast - Act II >C.J. and Sam have a discussion about Sam's proposal to move the press to the OEOB. C.J. tells him to don't even mention it again because it sends the wrong message to the country and would alienate the press. He tries a different tack with Josh and asks for a question to be added to the monthly poll about moving the press corps out of the West Wing."]]

classify and reply

['>>{WompaStompa_} : Roethlisberger won’t endorse or speak for Trump at convention', '>>{GoofballCircusFreak} : This is the funniest video of the campaign season by far. Someone should tell her not to cough into the mic.', ">>{CollumMcJingleballs} : Former president Vicente Fox: Mexico 'not going to pay for that (expletive) wall'", ">>{leonsugarfoot} : Shit, guess I can't endorse Trump now. I was waiting on Roethlisberger's endorsement.", '>>{marvinwork} : She cough the means her argument is invalid!!', ">>{target_locked} : Rapelisberger won't endorse Trump? OH NO! Surely this is the stumpening.", ">>{Petorie} : She's right, and he proved it today with his response to the Obama China thing. He said he would have turned the plane around and left. Obama didn't, and instead met with them and worked out a deal and accomplished more in 1 meeting than Trump has this decade.", '>>{basedOp} : Green Party likely nominee Dr. Jill Stein argues a student loan bailout would help boost the U.S. economy.', '>>{basedOp} : Mods: video description > Green Party likely nominee Dr. Jill Stein argues a student loan bailout would help boost the U.S. economy.', '>>{20WPM} : This is not a "young people" being held back issue. Dumbass _Social Security recipients_ are getting nicked for blowing off their obligations and responsibilities.', ">>{myellabella} : > Sean Spicer, I've said this to @realDonaldTrump and now I'll tell you: Mexico is not going to pay for that fucking wall. #FuckingWall https://twitter.com/VicenteFoxQue/status/824360005554044932", '>>{WompaStompa_} : Feels ridiculous to be talking about endorsements from athletes and celebrities, but these are the people that Trump said he would like to have speak at the RNC...', ">>{GonzoNation} : Ex-president Fox, don't even mention it. Talk about deals you're going to make with Germany and Brazil and Canada and make yourself wealthy. Forget about trying to talk to Trump. He gets off on making you feel bad - that's the personality you're dealing with. Someday maybe a high school tutor can come around and do remedial work with him. It's not possible to work out a deal with him. I know Foxconn just moved a factory there to be more convenient to Dell in Texas than their Singapore factory was. Just forget it for the moment. Sell to Brazil.", ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : So would paying off everyone's home loan. Doesn't mean we should do it.", ">>{roboboogienights} : So we shouldn't boost the economy then. OK. I think the banking industry has a lot more wiggle room than unemployed and underemployed people who went to college. But they don't wiggle, ever. So we really don't know what can be done.", '>>{OctoberxxSurprise} : He is looking for **winners** to motivate the people to go and vote to make America great again.', ">>{fluffyjdawg} : We bailed out wall street for a lot more money. I agree with her and I'm a debt free millennial.", ">>{SunriseSurprise} : I'd laugh if she doesn't end up being the Green Party nominee.", '>>{phantasmagoria143} : I dont believe it either. She has already been labeled "ill" by some, why go and let this happen? I mean even afterwords on the airplane, that looked bad. I understand people who cough a lot, but this has been going on for some time now, it was just strange.', ">>{OctoberxxSurprise} : Roethlisberger isn't even *going* to the convention. He is a democrat.", '>>{KarmaAndLies} : I am going to disagree with Miss Stein here. Giving people free money does boost the US economy, but it isn\'t a sustainable boost. If you use that same money on e.g. infrastructure it may be a sustainable boost. A better system might be: - Allow students (future, current, or former) to enroll in a public loan program. - Keep the program self-funding (e.g. interest rates only high enough to cover costs, no more). - Have repayment be income based. - Have repayment start at a certain income threshold (e.g. $35K+). - Have repayments ramp up gradually. - Have loans written off after 30 years. - Allow people to skip loan payments if they\'re doing things in the "public good" e.g. small business startup, charity, military service, teachers in impoverished areas, etc. The nice part about this plan is that you could build it so that it is self funded. It just needs initial capital to get going.', ">>{basedOp} : > Giving people free money does boost the US economy, but it isn't a sustainable boost. If you use that same money on e.g. infrastructure it may be a sustainable boost. Cancelling existing student debt would be a sustainable boost for 10-15 years (the average length of loan repayment) Rather than paying a monthly student loan payment, people have additional disposable income to spend or invest in the economy increasing the velocity of money.", '>>{fakeBenCarson} : Trump wants the convention to be like a WWE event because his supporters still think that shit is real.', ">>{RandomRedditor44} : I don't want to pay for that wall either. Aslo, how much is it going to cost?", '>>{americanrabbit} : *fence Honestly though. As much as im fine with immigrants coming and going, what frightens me is the thought of trump trapping me in.', '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Yes, and yes it was fucking stupid. But that money is gone (thanks Obama!) so how much more are you and yours willing to shovel over to bail out the next group?', ">>{Everythingberns} : Donald doesn't have the temperament and Hillary doesn't have the memory span.", '>>{Trump-Tzu} : Lol a Democrat not speaking for trump at the convention? Shocking news!', '>>{zoidboix} : Uhh, we bailed them out and they paid it back...', ">>{KarmaAndLies} : > Cancelling student debt is a sustainable boost. Every year after the cancellation you'll see a smaller and smaller rate of return on the investment. Ten years down the road I doubt we'd be able to measure an appreciable difference relative to not cancelling the debt. Plus the reality is that if you have the type of budget needed to clear the loan book, then you can do one heck of a lot of good to the US's infrastructure, and that can keep paying dividends for tens of years after. Additionally it doesn't really solve the systemic issues that brought us to this point. Changing how student loans are handled in the future *might*.", ">>{StonerMeditation} : Donald Crazy-Trump - not only is he a sociopath, but he's about to crash from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Having an exaggerated sense of self-importance Expecting to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it Exaggerating your achievements and talents Being preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate Believing that you are superior and can only be understood by or associate with equally special people Requiring constant admiration Having a sense of entitlement Expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance with your expectations Taking advantage of others to get what you want Having an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others Being envious of others and believing others envy you Behaving in an arrogant or haughty manner", ">>{MET1} : As the former president of Mexico, Fox doesn't really have a say, does he?", '>>{IPeedOnTrumpAMA} : Airplanes will still exist. As will tunnels and boats. But then, will you be able to afford a flight when our nation is bankrupt from a ridiculously expensive wall?', '>>{IPeedOnTrumpAMA} : Estimates from $15 - $40 Billion. And if you have any experience with actal costs of government infrastructure, you would know to double that figure to be more accurate. Gov jobs are always over-budget and usually staggeringly so.', '>>{Legendary-ish} : This is fluid in the lungs, likely due to the blood thinners allowing it to pass through the tissue when it otherwise wouldn\'t. She needs to be seriously careful or she\'ll "dry drown" when the muscles spasm.', ">>{Clasm} : Do you have a source on that? I'd appreciate it.", '>>{RandomRedditor44} : How do you know it will be a fence and not a wall?', ">>{RandomRedditor44} : I'll bet my ass Mexicans will somehow find a way over the wall Another question: why are sanctuary cities bad?", ">>{bulla564} : Isn't that the event where she had that 4 minute long coughing fit?", ">>{SquirrelTopTrump} : lol >According to the candidate, he also has the support of the star quarterbacks Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger; Brian France, the chief executive of Nascar; and Dana White, the president of Ultimate Fighting Championship. So, Dumpster Don suggests this guy, he politely bows out and now he's a rapist? I'm lovin' it!", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : When TARP bailed out Wall Street instead of simply handing the billions over to the rapacious cvnts we SHOULD have handed the checks to the homeowners whose mortgages contributed to the problems with the lienholders names already filled in. Instead the taxpayers got screwed over paying off their own homes without getting to keep them and then seeing them sold for pennies on the dollar to make Wall Street EVEN RICHER. You think the system is rigged? You have no fucking idea, and it's the DEMOCRATS WHO RIGGED IT!!!! HILLARY 2016!!!", '>>{298n} : Will this mark the beginning of the end for the Trump campaign?', '>>{chicken4every1} : Damn you beat me to it. This dude is such a douche and is more hated in pittsburgh than Cordel stewart and thats pretty bad', ">>{PARK_THE_BUS} : >So we shouldn't boost the economy then. OK. I find your assertion amusing - it's as if people are inherently against improving the economy. The thing about Jill Stein's assumption is it's just that. An assumption. She's strictly preaching from her own ideological background and takes little else into account of this assumption. The thing about student loan debt is that [for-profit colleges](http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/09/the-failure-of-for-profit-colleges/405301/) are the ones fueling the rise of said debt.", '>>{Roseking} : > why go and let this happen Because she can not win. Doesn\'t do anything. "Look she is hiding because she is sick" Goes to event and coughs on stage. "Look she is dying on stage."', '>>{americanrabbit} : Hes using the fence bill from 2006 to issue the order. If its a wall, congress will need to pass a new law', ">>{ILikeBigButtss} : The government was paid back with interest for the bailout. She's talking about buying up a trillion dollars in debt. It's completely different.", '>>{coyotl} : This was today. You may be thinking of one of several instances like this that happened earlier this year.', ">>{Dejesus_H_Christian} : She is so qualified to be President just thinking of having a President with a vagina gives me this scratchy ichy feeling in the back of my throat that I can't seem to get rid of.", '>>{Roseking} : I think you missed my point. You do realize I am a Clinton supporter?', ">>{MalcomXcrement} : TARP payouts increased Bush's deficit, TARP's paybacks decreased Obama's.", ">>{ILikeBigButtss} : What? The government was paid back for the bailout. That money isn't gone. It would be gone if there was no bailout, and banks failed.", ">>{basedOp} : > Additionally it doesn't really solve the systemic issues that brought us to this point. Cancelling student debt is one piece of the puzzle. At some point the US government WILL have to subsidize higher education (college tuition) to remain competitive with other industrialized nations which are already outpacing the US in producing highly skilled graduates with no debt.", ">>{20WPM} : > Cancelling existing student debt Is this a teaching moment? Contracts, responsibilities and obligations don't exist in the real world?", '>>{ILikeBigButtss} : There are much better ways to boost the economy than massive transfer payments to wipe out debt. Investing that money in building infrastructure would be far more productive and directly create jobs.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : I'm going to blame Bush for TARP. I'm going to blame Obama for following through with it.", '>>{phiwings} : Was the solution to let the banks fail, the financial system to collapse, and to have a second Great Depression? Edit: Not to mention that the government made money off the TARP program.', ">>{Wilileaks} : Yeah you should pay for my credit card too! Stupid government, why aren't they paying for my own dumb decisions!", ">>{Clasm} : [That's not how this works...](https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Philosophic_burden_of_proof)", ">>{Clasm} : Burden of proof lies on you in order to support your argument, philosophical debate or not. Making me do your work for you doesn't help your position.", '>>{Clasm} : Spare you what? The ability to see someone try and prove their own point?', '>>{skeenn} : Spare us your self righteous insistence that a comment here is a term paper', ">>{Clasm} : It isn't self-righteous and I never said anything about a term paper. I only asked if he had some proof to back up his claim. Why should I do that for him? Your insistence that this behavior is okay is why this sub is viewed as a joke most of the time.", '>>{SusaninSF} : Bailouts (that help individual Americans, not corporations) always help the economy. People will spend money on product instead of giving it to the loan sharks.', '>>{guitmusic12} : The Stimulus package was signed into law feb 17th 2009... The recession started December of 07 what timeline are you on that the stimulus began before the recession? it didnt replace all the losses you are correct but.. >do i get my savings back? If you left it in wherever it was invested the stimulus help the economy recover and markets have produced a 50% return from the peak before the recession hit >How about lost wages during the 9 months of unemployment Well the stimulus package increased unemployment benefits and extended the period of time that it cover on top of providing extra job training and increased the food stamp program significantly. It might not have covered everything to it was a pretty good start']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{WompaStompa_} : Roethlisberger won’t endorse or speak for Trump at convention', ">>{leonsugarfoot} : Shit, guess I can't endorse Trump now. I was waiting on Roethlisberger's endorsement.", ">>{target_locked} : Rapelisberger won't endorse Trump? OH NO! Surely this is the stumpening.", '>>{WompaStompa_} : Feels ridiculous to be talking about endorsements from athletes and celebrities, but these are the people that Trump said he would like to have speak at the RNC...', '>>{OctoberxxSurprise} : He is looking for **winners** to motivate the people to go and vote to make America great again.', ">>{OctoberxxSurprise} : Roethlisberger isn't even *going* to the convention. He is a democrat.", '>>{fakeBenCarson} : Trump wants the convention to be like a WWE event because his supporters still think that shit is real.', '>>{Trump-Tzu} : Lol a Democrat not speaking for trump at the convention? Shocking news!', ">>{SquirrelTopTrump} : lol >According to the candidate, he also has the support of the star quarterbacks Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger; Brian France, the chief executive of Nascar; and Dana White, the president of Ultimate Fighting Championship. So, Dumpster Don suggests this guy, he politely bows out and now he's a rapist? I'm lovin' it!", '>>{298n} : Will this mark the beginning of the end for the Trump campaign?', '>>{chicken4every1} : Damn you beat me to it. This dude is such a douche and is more hated in pittsburgh than Cordel stewart and thats pretty bad'], [">>{CollumMcJingleballs} : Former president Vicente Fox: Mexico 'not going to pay for that (expletive) wall'", ">>{myellabella} : > Sean Spicer, I've said this to @realDonaldTrump and now I'll tell you: Mexico is not going to pay for that fucking wall. #FuckingWall https://twitter.com/VicenteFoxQue/status/824360005554044932", ">>{GonzoNation} : Ex-president Fox, don't even mention it. Talk about deals you're going to make with Germany and Brazil and Canada and make yourself wealthy. Forget about trying to talk to Trump. He gets off on making you feel bad - that's the personality you're dealing with. Someday maybe a high school tutor can come around and do remedial work with him. It's not possible to work out a deal with him. I know Foxconn just moved a factory there to be more convenient to Dell in Texas than their Singapore factory was. Just forget it for the moment. Sell to Brazil.", ">>{RandomRedditor44} : I don't want to pay for that wall either. Aslo, how much is it going to cost?", '>>{americanrabbit} : *fence Honestly though. As much as im fine with immigrants coming and going, what frightens me is the thought of trump trapping me in.', ">>{MET1} : As the former president of Mexico, Fox doesn't really have a say, does he?", '>>{IPeedOnTrumpAMA} : Airplanes will still exist. As will tunnels and boats. But then, will you be able to afford a flight when our nation is bankrupt from a ridiculously expensive wall?', '>>{IPeedOnTrumpAMA} : Estimates from $15 - $40 Billion. And if you have any experience with actal costs of government infrastructure, you would know to double that figure to be more accurate. Gov jobs are always over-budget and usually staggeringly so.', '>>{RandomRedditor44} : How do you know it will be a fence and not a wall?', ">>{RandomRedditor44} : I'll bet my ass Mexicans will somehow find a way over the wall Another question: why are sanctuary cities bad?", '>>{americanrabbit} : Hes using the fence bill from 2006 to issue the order. If its a wall, congress will need to pass a new law'], ['>>{GoofballCircusFreak} : This is the funniest video of the campaign season by far. Someone should tell her not to cough into the mic.', '>>{marvinwork} : She cough the means her argument is invalid!!', ">>{Petorie} : She's right, and he proved it today with his response to the Obama China thing. He said he would have turned the plane around and left. Obama didn't, and instead met with them and worked out a deal and accomplished more in 1 meeting than Trump has this decade.", '>>{phantasmagoria143} : I dont believe it either. She has already been labeled "ill" by some, why go and let this happen? I mean even afterwords on the airplane, that looked bad. I understand people who cough a lot, but this has been going on for some time now, it was just strange.', ">>{Everythingberns} : Donald doesn't have the temperament and Hillary doesn't have the memory span.", ">>{StonerMeditation} : Donald Crazy-Trump - not only is he a sociopath, but he's about to crash from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Having an exaggerated sense of self-importance Expecting to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it Exaggerating your achievements and talents Being preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate Believing that you are superior and can only be understood by or associate with equally special people Requiring constant admiration Having a sense of entitlement Expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance with your expectations Taking advantage of others to get what you want Having an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others Being envious of others and believing others envy you Behaving in an arrogant or haughty manner", '>>{Legendary-ish} : This is fluid in the lungs, likely due to the blood thinners allowing it to pass through the tissue when it otherwise wouldn\'t. She needs to be seriously careful or she\'ll "dry drown" when the muscles spasm.', ">>{bulla564} : Isn't that the event where she had that 4 minute long coughing fit?", '>>{Roseking} : > why go and let this happen Because she can not win. Doesn\'t do anything. "Look she is hiding because she is sick" Goes to event and coughs on stage. "Look she is dying on stage."', '>>{coyotl} : This was today. You may be thinking of one of several instances like this that happened earlier this year.', ">>{Dejesus_H_Christian} : She is so qualified to be President just thinking of having a President with a vagina gives me this scratchy ichy feeling in the back of my throat that I can't seem to get rid of.", '>>{Roseking} : I think you missed my point. You do realize I am a Clinton supporter?'], ['>>{basedOp} : Green Party likely nominee Dr. Jill Stein argues a student loan bailout would help boost the U.S. economy.', '>>{basedOp} : Mods: video description > Green Party likely nominee Dr. Jill Stein argues a student loan bailout would help boost the U.S. economy.', '>>{20WPM} : This is not a "young people" being held back issue. Dumbass _Social Security recipients_ are getting nicked for blowing off their obligations and responsibilities.', ">>{Themostunderdisturb} : So would paying off everyone's home loan. Doesn't mean we should do it.", ">>{roboboogienights} : So we shouldn't boost the economy then. OK. I think the banking industry has a lot more wiggle room than unemployed and underemployed people who went to college. But they don't wiggle, ever. So we really don't know what can be done.", ">>{fluffyjdawg} : We bailed out wall street for a lot more money. I agree with her and I'm a debt free millennial.", ">>{SunriseSurprise} : I'd laugh if she doesn't end up being the Green Party nominee.", '>>{KarmaAndLies} : I am going to disagree with Miss Stein here. Giving people free money does boost the US economy, but it isn\'t a sustainable boost. If you use that same money on e.g. infrastructure it may be a sustainable boost. A better system might be: - Allow students (future, current, or former) to enroll in a public loan program. - Keep the program self-funding (e.g. interest rates only high enough to cover costs, no more). - Have repayment be income based. - Have repayment start at a certain income threshold (e.g. $35K+). - Have repayments ramp up gradually. - Have loans written off after 30 years. - Allow people to skip loan payments if they\'re doing things in the "public good" e.g. small business startup, charity, military service, teachers in impoverished areas, etc. The nice part about this plan is that you could build it so that it is self funded. It just needs initial capital to get going.', ">>{basedOp} : > Giving people free money does boost the US economy, but it isn't a sustainable boost. If you use that same money on e.g. infrastructure it may be a sustainable boost. Cancelling existing student debt would be a sustainable boost for 10-15 years (the average length of loan repayment) Rather than paying a monthly student loan payment, people have additional disposable income to spend or invest in the economy increasing the velocity of money.", '>>{SlicedDicedBeef} : Yes, and yes it was fucking stupid. But that money is gone (thanks Obama!) so how much more are you and yours willing to shovel over to bail out the next group?', '>>{zoidboix} : Uhh, we bailed them out and they paid it back...', ">>{KarmaAndLies} : > Cancelling student debt is a sustainable boost. Every year after the cancellation you'll see a smaller and smaller rate of return on the investment. Ten years down the road I doubt we'd be able to measure an appreciable difference relative to not cancelling the debt. Plus the reality is that if you have the type of budget needed to clear the loan book, then you can do one heck of a lot of good to the US's infrastructure, and that can keep paying dividends for tens of years after. Additionally it doesn't really solve the systemic issues that brought us to this point. Changing how student loans are handled in the future *might*.", ">>{Clasm} : Do you have a source on that? I'd appreciate it.", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : When TARP bailed out Wall Street instead of simply handing the billions over to the rapacious cvnts we SHOULD have handed the checks to the homeowners whose mortgages contributed to the problems with the lienholders names already filled in. Instead the taxpayers got screwed over paying off their own homes without getting to keep them and then seeing them sold for pennies on the dollar to make Wall Street EVEN RICHER. You think the system is rigged? You have no fucking idea, and it's the DEMOCRATS WHO RIGGED IT!!!! HILLARY 2016!!!", ">>{PARK_THE_BUS} : >So we shouldn't boost the economy then. OK. I find your assertion amusing - it's as if people are inherently against improving the economy. The thing about Jill Stein's assumption is it's just that. An assumption. She's strictly preaching from her own ideological background and takes little else into account of this assumption. The thing about student loan debt is that [for-profit colleges](http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/09/the-failure-of-for-profit-colleges/405301/) are the ones fueling the rise of said debt.", ">>{ILikeBigButtss} : The government was paid back with interest for the bailout. She's talking about buying up a trillion dollars in debt. It's completely different.", ">>{MalcomXcrement} : TARP payouts increased Bush's deficit, TARP's paybacks decreased Obama's.", ">>{ILikeBigButtss} : What? The government was paid back for the bailout. That money isn't gone. It would be gone if there was no bailout, and banks failed.", ">>{basedOp} : > Additionally it doesn't really solve the systemic issues that brought us to this point. Cancelling student debt is one piece of the puzzle. At some point the US government WILL have to subsidize higher education (college tuition) to remain competitive with other industrialized nations which are already outpacing the US in producing highly skilled graduates with no debt.", ">>{20WPM} : > Cancelling existing student debt Is this a teaching moment? Contracts, responsibilities and obligations don't exist in the real world?", '>>{ILikeBigButtss} : There are much better ways to boost the economy than massive transfer payments to wipe out debt. Investing that money in building infrastructure would be far more productive and directly create jobs.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : I'm going to blame Bush for TARP. I'm going to blame Obama for following through with it.", '>>{phiwings} : Was the solution to let the banks fail, the financial system to collapse, and to have a second Great Depression? Edit: Not to mention that the government made money off the TARP program.', ">>{Wilileaks} : Yeah you should pay for my credit card too! Stupid government, why aren't they paying for my own dumb decisions!", ">>{Clasm} : [That's not how this works...](https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Philosophic_burden_of_proof)", ">>{Clasm} : Burden of proof lies on you in order to support your argument, philosophical debate or not. Making me do your work for you doesn't help your position.", '>>{Clasm} : Spare you what? The ability to see someone try and prove their own point?', '>>{skeenn} : Spare us your self righteous insistence that a comment here is a term paper', ">>{Clasm} : It isn't self-righteous and I never said anything about a term paper. I only asked if he had some proof to back up his claim. Why should I do that for him? Your insistence that this behavior is okay is why this sub is viewed as a joke most of the time.", '>>{SusaninSF} : Bailouts (that help individual Americans, not corporations) always help the economy. People will spend money on product instead of giving it to the loan sharks.', '>>{guitmusic12} : The Stimulus package was signed into law feb 17th 2009... The recession started December of 07 what timeline are you on that the stimulus began before the recession? it didnt replace all the losses you are correct but.. >do i get my savings back? If you left it in wherever it was invested the stimulus help the economy recover and markets have produced a 50% return from the peak before the recession hit >How about lost wages during the 9 months of unemployment Well the stimulus package increased unemployment benefits and extended the period of time that it cover on top of providing extra job training and increased the food stamp program significantly. It might not have covered everything to it was a pretty good start']]

classify and reply

['>>{yhwhx} : I accept that tomorrow we will have a dim narcissistic grifter in the the White House.', '>>{Langosta_9er} : Obama: China Would Not take US Policy Shift on Taiwan Lightly', '>>{xahnel} : Whilst exploring, explorers accidentally discover enormous bribes Russians funneled to Hillary to get US uranium. Edit: http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/28/rosoboronexport-russias-main-weapons-exporter-gets/ http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html Putin is old school KGB. You know how they operated? If they bribed someone, that person was theirs for life. Tell me... why would the Russians sabotage the chances of someone they own sitting in the White House?', '>>{EoinODuffy_} : [The new hero of the Democrats, apparently](http://ponderingprinciples.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Joe-McCarthy.jpg)', '>>{ohheyitsdeejay} : Ok. But I will not "give him a chance".', ">>{NoYourRacist} : Are Russian conspiracy's really the best defense the Hillary cultists can come up with? So desperate it's sad. Thanks for electing Trump you morons.", ">>{stashtv} : Most of the GOP bullet points addressed: * Block (dollar) grants to states. * Removal of individual mandate. * Higher premiums allowed for those that allow a lapse in coverage. * Tax credits, with an income cap. * All Planned Parenthood funding removed. * Pre-existing conditions will be kept. Would like to see a single woman GOP vote against this, but I'm sure they will fall in line with the rest of the party.", '>>{the_glutton} : I don\'t understand how Trump supporters can continually say "but Uranium" and not understand how Trump is any different... and he\'s the one suggesting putting Russia in a strategically stronger position.', ">>{Schwa142} : You don't have to be pro-Trump to be anti-Hillary...", '>>{graNheli} : He was smart enough to easily beat the best and brightest of the left.', ">>{m1kepro} : >All Planned Parenthood funding removed Well, this bill is dead. It can't pass the Senate without help from the Democrats, and defunding PP would be be a death sentence to most Democratic Senator's careers.", '>>{someguywithanaccount} : This seems like it\'s basically the same policy. Nothing of substance has changed. They "got rid" of the individual mandate except not really because of 30% rate hike that took its place. Some might decide that\'s worth it and forego coverage, but good luck covering old people and preexisting conditions without young people buying into the program. Expect costs to increase even faster than in the last few years if that happens. The Planned Parenthood part is messed up. Honestly I wouldn\'t care too much one way or the other except for that. What am I missing? I know it reduces some subsidies, but I\'m not sure how significantly.', '>>{1461DaysInHell} : Obama puts on sunglasses and says "Donnie, deal with it" The donnie is going to clean up this can of beans he has opened.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I'm not sure what he was thinking. I hope they do retaliate economically.", '>>{Schwa142} : You think they came up with it...? There were fed that narrative.', ">>{loki8481} : > Conservatives have had to grin and bear it for eight years grinning and bearing it... yup, that's totally how I'd describe conservatives over the past 8 years. http://ugc.reveliststatic.com/gen/constrain/800/800/100/2016/11/16/15/8p/yc/phwm3gf8o42qbwe.jpg", '>>{VStarffin} : This plan is pretty hilarious in that its so obvious just the reaction of people who hated Obamacare. There\'s nothing coherent in here - it\'s not a coherent plan. It\'s just people looking at Obamacare and saying "hm, what do we hate about this and then how can we change just those things"? My favorite part of this, that I\'ve read so far, is their solution for the individual mandate. Apparently, this plan removes the individual mandate, but they says that if you don\'t have insurance for more than 2 months, then an insurance company is *required* to impose a 30% increase in your premiums. Think about that. Think how crazy this is on so many levels. Just to make a couple points: **First**, it doesn\'t even solve the issue. The mandate had 2 basic reasons to exist - (i) it was a way of forcing healthier people into the markets, making the markets healthier as a whole and bring down the average premium and (ii) it solved the moral hazard problem, where people would just wait until they got sick before buying insurance (because insurance companies aren\'t allowed to deny you for a pre-existing condition). This mechanism solves neither of those things. It does the opposite. All this does it let you buy into insurance when you get sick *at a slightly higher price* than the ACA does. This is...not a big incentive. If I get cancer, and I know that the costs will be $500,000 or something, who cares if my insurance premiums are now $600 per month instead of $400? That\'s not a meaningful difference compared to the liability. So people will still wait to buy in, ruining the purpose of the law. **Secondly**, this is even more unconstitutional than the individual mandate. In what universe of conservative political philosophy can the government force a private company to charge a certain class of people a higher price? That\'s insane. The individual mandate skated by as a tax because the penalty was paid *to the government*. What is the possible legal argument that this is constitutional while the individual mandate isn\'t? And this is just one part of this idiocy. Dear god. It\'s just so transparently obvious that this party doesn\'t care at all about this issue and has not thought deeply about it *at all* other than as political cudgel.', ">>{branamuffin} : It's almost as if he's read the past 50 years of Taiwan Straight history and made a rational conclusion, and didn't shoot his mouth off without thinking of the repurcussions.", ">>{OJSamson} : Yeah cause the GOP just grinned and neared that last 8 years. It's not like they tried to call Obama illegitimate on wild claims of being a Kenyan Muslim. Not like the were obstructionists for the past 8 years. Fuck you purposely self-unaware guy", ">>{drucifer271} : It doesn't reduce subsidies, it replaces them with a tax credit - AKA, helping people who are already better off. A tax credit does jack shit for poor folks.", ">>{pjoneill15} : I am not happy about it, and don't like his choices so far, but I will continue to root for his success because even though he is a jackweed, I care about my friends and myself who are American. Edit: and people who aren't Americans who will be affected by this.", '>>{oranjemania} : ["The best?" Hahahahahahahahahahahaha.](https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughTrumpSpam/comments/4teoxl/a_final_response_to_the_tell_me_why_trump_is_a/)', ">>{6p6ss6} : China isn't exactly known for taking things it doesn't like *lightly*. They have a civilizational history with this shit. When they wanted to build a wall, they did; we toyed with the idea for a few months and got cold feet when it turned out that it was a lot of work and expense that wouldn't be reimbursed.", '>>{gabagool69} : Came here to post this. Somebody needs to teach this woman the definition of irony.', ">>{xahnel} : Let's see, one person built some buildings in Russia... The other directly contributed to nuclear proliferation.", '>>{ebox86} : and here i was, secretly holding out for trump to unveil single payer. Oh well.', ">>{the_glutton} : Did you read the article? It's not just about Trump.", '>>{lebowskisfarmhand} : What is "Something that didn\'t happen" Correct for $1000!', '>>{TinyBaron} : I only accept what he [would have wanted...](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/266034630820507648)', '>>{apolitic} : Well that may be the one thing that actually does it in - the fact that it would screw over healthcare companies by forcing them to take sick people when they get sick. Republicans are run by corporation profits after all not people.', '>>{mbreinig} : I care about all people, not just Americans.', '>>{sprag80} : Nothing "tin hat" about today\'s well-researched NYT article: Russian Military Intelligence hacked the DNC servers for over a year, obtained a treasure trove of documents, and gave these stolen documents to Wikileaks for timed release just before the Democratic Convention. Why? So Putin\'s boy/pet poodle, Donald Trump, can win the national election and effectively annul NATO\'s collective security guarantee so Russia\'s sphere of influence in Europe can expand exponentially. Trump is a Manchurian Candidate. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-emails.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news', '>>{IvankaDrumpf} : Some people hate Trump more than they care for America', ">>{Langosta_9er} : Are you really comparing a fortification built between 200 BCE and 1300 CE to Trump's proposed wall?", ">>{abigscarybat} : No thanks. I'd rather the Vladling stew in the knowledge that everyone is aware what a sham he is.", ">>{the_glutton} : As I see it, the Russians are the only ones who are actively trying to support 1 candidate in this election, a candidate who would roll back nearly 70 years of American foreign policy precedent in Europe and allow them to increase their sphere of influence for the first time since the end of the Cold War. And if you read into the facts of the uranium deal, it's clear that she had minimal impact on the sale (it had to be approved by 10 other partie), the money was donated a full 2 years before approval, and the uranium produced in the states can't even be exported outside of the US.", '>>{someguywithanaccount} : Thanks. Would that not get them more money on their tax return? Can you get more money back than you paid?', ">>{Shiny-And-New} : I'm still cheering for the whole administration to get hit with some high crimes and misdemeanors", '>>{Gscarveguy} : Trump and Manafort are traitors...lock them up! Waterboard them!', ">>{Mossanony} : No. I won't do that. Had Kasich or Bush or any of the qualified GOP candidates won, sure, there would be grumbling but not this. Not this level of anxiety and fear. And it's not just those of us here in the USA. Trump was a rage vote against the machine. I get that. But he should never, *never* have won this office.", '>>{Deofol7} : He beat them. But the left got 3,000,000 more votes. Do not pretend like Trump "outsmarted" the left. The fact that his transition has gone so horribly (there was no plan for appointments or what to do with his businesses) is proof enough that he never thought he would win. He got the right votes in the right places, but I am pretty sure his next thought was "Fuck" now I can\'t make as much money. Starting TRUMP TV would have been so much more lucrative.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : So Trump voters get exactly what they voted for. It's not as much a burden on my wallet as it would be theirs. I'm content with him repealing Obamacare. Some of them will die off.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : What of it? Do you think all liberals are bleeding hearts? I believe in things like equality. Trump voters clearly do not. They were ok with supporting a racist, or overlooking his racism in favor of other policies. Neither are ok. The sooner scum like that die off the better the world will be. There's no saving these people when they reject logic.", '>>{Toddisan} : Welcome to four years(or less)of opposition! Let the battle begin,', ">>{Nurgle} : No individual mandate, pre-existing conditions allowed, and insurers can charger higher premiums to people who's coverage lapses. Sounds like a great recipe for private market death spiral.", ">>{elsashardnipples} : He was smart enough to curbstomp Hillary. I wonder how many bottles of wine she's gone through in the past few months.", '>>{Hans_Gucci} : Trump is going to be a shitty president. Accept it.', ">>{msmithsjc} : The only good thing coming out of this that I can see is that we'll finally get a shot at single payer again. California might actually get the ball rolling on that, and the rest of the country can follow.", ">>{build-a-guac} : Trump is probably the worst racist ever. If you actually watched him speak (and not just looked at 3rd hand editorialized sources of his quotes) you would know this. I'd probably have to call you a low information voter.", '>>{dr_pepper_35} : Yeah, just like the republicans accepted Obama, right?', '>>{2RINITY} : But what does Trump succeeding mean? Does it mean we build the wall? Does it mean we break up NATO? Does it mean we deport 10 million people? Or does it mean he accomplishes very little of his pledged agenda and the economy keeps doing well in spite of that?', ">>{VStarffin} : Well, that was always the case after the ACA passed. This change is better for companies though - it's basically just the individual mandate but the money goes directly to insurance companies, not the government.", ">>{PowerOfTheMind} : If you actually think that is a legitimate criticism, I don't know what to tell you. Of course there are going to be a few failed investments, he dealt with many different business ideas. How about you criticize him about something that actually matters/makes sense? Criticize him for screwing over investors in Atlantic City, or for screwing over contractors for his properties.", '>>{2ndprize} : Curbstomp seems like a big word for how that all played out.', ">>{wendell-t-stamps} : The plain fact of the matter is that Jina cares far more about the status of Taiwan than we do. There's no way in hell we're getting into a shooting war with them over the island, and they know that. The best strategy has been the current one: keep assistance on the DL, talk about the importance of self determination, and make ourselves valuable as a trading partner in order for them to tamp down their invasion plans. All that shit goes out the window when we make it seem like we're supporting a declaration of independence for Taiwan. Trump's national security advisers are a bunch of morons who might end up getting Taiwan hard fucked.", '>>{ward0630} : This is going to cause a lot of Republican infighting. Should be fun.', ">>{moleratical} : >When Obama was elected president, I don’t remember Republicans taking to the streets and shouting, “He’s not my president!” That's pretty much exactly what happened.", ">>{someguywithanaccount} : I almost want this to pass because it would be terrible for Trump's base. But that's really unfair to those that fall in that demographic but don't support him. And also the PP thing.", '>>{dr_pepper_35} : Careful, that is so edgy you might cut yourself. *edit-OP here was cool enough to edit the post I responded too...', ">>{thewolfshead} : When Obama won: [We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/266034630820507648)", '>>{someguywithanaccount} : Democrats need to advertise this as a government overreach. All of the fear mongering with ACA pt. 1 was THE GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER FORCED YOU TO PURCHASE FROM A PRIVATE COMPANY BEFORE. Democrats should shout the same thing about private companies being required to charge you more money.', ">>{Langosta_9er} : No. I don't think all liberals are bleeding hearts. I'm a liberal and I don't consider myself a bleeding heart. I just think you're an asshole.", ">>{pjoneill15} : it means succeeding at what the purpose of the President is for America and the people we influence. This isn't about him. It's about America and the people we all care about. I am not going to root against him because I don't like him. I am going to root for him and criticize him when he makes decisions I do not agree with.", '>>{Pylons} : The current wall was actually built mostly during the Ming dynasty, in the 1400s.', '>>{firstinternational} : >best and brightest of the left You\'ve heard it here first, folks. Hillary, a "leftist" who must be seeking the revolutionary destruction of capitalism and class-society for the liberation of humanity.', '>>{6p6ss6} : I am merely copying [Trump](http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-bill-oreilly-mexico-wall-great-china) in that comparison.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I heard his comments on Judge Curiel, his family's history of housing discrimination lawsuits, his comments on Mexicans, the way he talks about black communities, and I can safely qualify the man as a racist. Whether you want to believe it or not is up to you. You can call me whatever the hell you want to. I'm not particularly interested. There's evidence to support what I say and you're not going to make it disappear or change it.", ">>{SchwarzerKaffee} : The only reason he didn't lose the real estate business is because it was more expensive for the bank to let him fill than to loan him more money and pull him from the reigns. He is only successful at fleecing people. Even the opening of The Apprentice told numerous lies about his 'success'.", '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : Why? Because I want them to get what they voted for? Please elaborate. He tells them he will get rid of Obamacare---a service which is helping save some of their lives. The GOP wants to repeal it and has not, to my knowledge, introduced any kind of legislation that will protect people with pre-existing conditions. So some of them will die. They voted for that knowingly. Why should I feel bad for their stupidity?', '>>{PowerOfTheMind} : He\'s going to be president no matter how many times you tweet, "#NotMyPresident".', '>>{build-a-guac} : > I heard his comments on Judge Curiel Comments saying that he thinks the Judge made a ridiculous ruling and the best explanation for his ruling is that the Judge is biased? > his family\'s history of housing discrimination lawsuits Does "settled out of court with no admission of guilt" not mean anything to you? > his comments on Mexicans You mean his comments on Mexicans that illegally cross the border? > the way he talks about black communities Like these quotes? > When I am President, I will work to ensure that all of our kids are treated equally, and protected equally. Every action I take, I will ask myself: does this make life better for young Americans in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Ferguson who have as much of a right to live out their dreams as any other child in America? -- > African-American citizens have sacrificed so much for this nation. They have fought and died in every war since the Revolution, and from the pews and the picket lines they have lifted up the conscience of our country in the long march for Civil Rights. Yet, too many African-Americans have been left behind. -- > It is my highest and greatest hope that the Republican Party can be the home in the future and forevermore for African-Americans and the African-American vote because I will produce, and I will get others to produce, and we know for a fact it doesn’t work with the Democrats and it certainly doesn’t work with Hillary. what a *racist*', ">>{abigscarybat} : Fucking squatter's going to wreck the furniture, you know he will.", ">>{PowerOfTheMind} : So you'd rather see government fail because you didn't get what you wanted? Pretty selfish. Trump is an asshole but I'd much rather see the country prosper during his time.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I'm going to stop you from the very first one. Let's talk about judge Curiel. This was the question he was asked in regards to it. >Dickerson: Let me ask you about, what does the Mexican heritage of the judge in the Trump University case have to do with anything? >Trump: I think it has a lot to do with it. That's all that needs to be said. He is a racist. Bend over all you like to try and deny it. Go ahead. Try to omit all you can. But it's not changing anything. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2016/jun/08/donald-trumps-racial-comments-about-judge-trump-un/", ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : What's wrong with quoting the beliefs of the President elect?", '>>{build-a-guac} : > Takes one quote, refuses to put it in to context, places hands over ears, closes eyes and screams "racist" liberalism in 2016 Even this commenter I found on *youtube* gets it. > I think most people can see past the stupidity of the media. trump is clearly not claiming that a judge cannot or should not be a Mexican. >He is simply saying that the best explanation for the unfair/stupid rulings by the judge is because he a Mexican that hates me for wanting to build a wall. You want to know why people don\'t take leftists seriously when they call people racist? Well, it should be pretty obvious to you now...', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : He literally said the judge's heritage plays a role in how he was treated. That's outrageous. The judge can't be objective...because he's Mexican and opposed to Trump building a wall? Really? To what rational person does that make sense? It does not.", ">>{Loop_Within_A_Loop} : I gave him a chance. He's already squandered it.", ">>{abigscarybat} : We will have have to be very careful about edginess in the future, since we won't be able to afford treatment for cuts or sick burns.", '>>{Samuel_L_Jewson} : >Does "settled out of court with no admission of guilt" not mean anything to you? The other guy stopped at the bit about Judge Curiel, but I gotta say something about this. Having no admission of guilt doesn\'t mean nothing was done wrong, it just means the wrong being righted was more important to the state than shaming the defendant. If the situation is remedied, is it really worth the cost of an extended trial just to get someone to admit guilt? Specifically in regards to Trump\'s discrimination lawsuit, he was told to stop by the courts *twice* before he actually stopped discriminating against black people. After the first case, the court sent undercover buyers/renters who were both white and black and found that Trump was *still* discriminating. As for all the pandering he tried to do to black people this election, actions speak louder than words.', '>>{profgray2} : Yah, grow up just like the Republicans did during the Obama administration.. Oh, wait....', '>>{kescusay} : If by "curbstomp" you mean "luck into a unique situation where the bizarre and archaic electoral college system, which values geographic location over people, happened to be heavily tilted in his favor, allowing him to win with 3 million fewer votes," sure. In sports, that\'s called a handicap. Trump is the sports handicap president.', '>>{ohheyitsdeejay} : His "chance" includes a Muslim registry, going backwards with climate change, limiting rights for LGBT, and cozying up with Russia, among other things. So, no, I will not enable this shit by giving him a chance.', '>>{build-a-guac} : Wow, the best people have against Trump is a lawsuit from decades ago with no admission of guilt. He\'s basically a nazi, right? I have something much more recent where Clinton called black people "superpredators." Do you care about that? You would if she were Republican. Its not whataboutism. Its demonstrating that even Clinton, who, ostensibly, you view as not racist, would be painted as a "racist Hitler neo-nazi" by the Democrats if she were a Republican. And you would probably agree with them and also help them push that narrative. This calls any accusations of racism from the Democrats in to question.', ">>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : Yeah Putin hacked people's brains like Yuri from Red Alert and mind controlled them into thinking Hillary was a terrible candidate they didn't like.", ">>{yhwhx} : In Donnie's own words: [We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/266034630820507648)", '>>{Im_Edumucated} : Lol, yep. Conservatives have all sat quietly on the sidelines and not let a peep of fucking criticism out of their mouth for 8 years. No major protests, no fabricated scandals, no gridlocking the federal fucking government. Just been waiting patiently for their return back to the White House.', '>>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : Well, if you beat your friend 306 - 232 at ping-pong you could probably reasonably yell "I curbstomped you!".', ">>{alllie} : When you have the Russians and the billionaires helping you, you don't have to be bright.", '>>{Animated_post} : This is America. The country that rejected a King in return for freedom. We definitely dont have to accept a tyrant.', ">>{dr_pepper_35} : No, Putin organized the hacking of the DNC and then funneled the information to Wikileaks. Wikileaks then released the info in a steady stream to give ammo to trump. This was organized by members of trumps campaign staff and Russian intelligence. It is all part of Putins plans to destabilize the EU, the US and NATO. And it's working.", '>>{PowerOfTheMind} : I know about all of this. But how about we be a little bit better than the Republicans that were totally about this kinda shit? Pretty low standard to hold yourself to.', ">>{Cuckinandshillin} : Actually, I want to see government fail, because people need to learn a lesson about falling for demagogues. The institution that was supposed to protect the people from this sort of douchebaggery contributed to it instead, so we're on our own.", '>>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : If there was nothing improper in there then hacking the DNC would have produced nothing.', '>>{PowerOfTheMind} : Incredibly short sighted and selfish, like the GOP 8 years ago.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Playing fair doesn't win us elections. It's time to imitate their tactics.", '>>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : The electoral collage, as designed by the founders, worked exactly as they intended.', '>>{ArkadiusMaximus} : I wonder how he is going to be able to keep up with that spray tan in office', '>>{pondo13} : Gee Republicants have a terrible case of selective memory. Trump literally tweeted in 2012 the election was a sham and people should take to the streets.', ">>{DoopSlayer} : he's already failed his second, third, fourth, etc chance.", '>>{AlaDouche} : Maybe it says something more about the American people than it does about the tactics they use.', ">>{Jack_Decker_CIA} : So do the exact same with Trump if you want? It's your right to. Just know that anyone who acts that way about an American president to enough of a degree will get a nice visit from the Secret Service or SS as I like to call them", '>>{abigscarybat} : I want the country to thrive. That necessarily means I want Trump not to get a single blessed thing that he wants.', '>>{reluctant_typer} : He hasn\'t even taken office yet. I bet you think you\'re "open minded".', ">>{LeoXearo} : Democrats taking the high road and keeping the gloves on is what got us a Trump presidency. Angry people vote, scared people vote, which is why the Republican tactic of propagating hate and fear won them the government. Too many would-be democrats feel indifferent when it comes to politics, they don't feel enough of anything to bother voting and thats a problem.", ">>{AlaDouche} : You should. If you don't think you're fucked, you're sorely mistaken.", ">>{reluctant_typer} : We already have a Muslim registry (it's called the NSA), climate change is a bitch, I'm LGBT and I disagree totally I think his election is the best thing for LGBT rights ever (we finally got the republicans to shut up about it), and working with Russia when possible isn't a bad idea.", ">>{DumpsterDon} : No thanks. I don't accept an Orange Menace as my President. Accept it. Dumpster is going to get level 5 obstruction and criticism. Just like Obama got.", ">>{gonzoparenting} : the Kremlin spent millions on getting Trump elected. That's why Trump didn't have to spend as much.", '>>{goody_heggety} : Yeah because 80,000 slackers in three states stayed home. No majority. No mandate. Massive insecurity because of it.', '>>{abigscarybat} : Ah, the old "If you have nothing to fear, you have nothing to hide" defense, with a dash of ends justifying the means.', '>>{reluctant_typer} : Protecting your ego in case he succeeds and proves you wrong. How infantile.', ">>{peepalapeep} : Yeah they've been the biggest whining snowflakes for the past 8 years", '>>{goody_heggety} : If this is a friend to LGBT people, I hate to see the enemies. https://thepridela.com/2016/11/trumps-cabinet-almost-uniformly-hostile-toward-lgbt-rights/', '>>{abigscarybat} : What if you beat your friend by nearly 3 million?', '>>{abigscarybat} : Have you not been paying attention to his Cabinet appointments?', '>>{2ndprize} : They don\'t talk about that because it only counts points scored when they "weren\'t ready" so it was cheating.', '>>{ohheyitsdeejay} : Climate change is a bitch is not a valid argument', ">>{reluctant_typer} : How does this rejecting reality thing work? I didn't realize that was an option, you know, mentally.", '>>{lol_trump_voters} : > When Obama was elected president, I don’t remember Republicans taking to the streets and shouting, “He’s not my president!” I wish this poor man luck in treating his memory loss.', ">>{abigscarybat} : No, but the confirmation hearings are enough to give anyone who isn't crazy, stupid, or evil cause for alarm.", ">>{alllie} : True. But the cheapskate Hillary didn't spend anything on rigging voting machines and vote counting software. That was false economy.", ">>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : Well if you take out the three million illegals who fraudulently voted for Hillary because they didn't want the wall to be built that gets cancelled out. So it would be like if your friend had an Mexican join him on his side of the table to help him score those points of course you are going to say those points don't count. They were illegal points by an illegal alien.", '>>{nolivesmatterCthulhu} : How dare you be gay and not support the democrats -r/politics', '>>{nolivesmatterCthulhu} : Rigging your own primary is what got us a Trump presidency', ">>{appmanga} : And what do you think we're concerned about? I'm concerned about America. I love this country. I've been critical of Republicans and Democrats. I don't think you get it: people aren't rooting against him, they're concerned about what he has proposed and how has acted. This is not your run-of-the-mill politician; this is a mentally ill authoritarian who is now in charge of the world's largest military and it's nuclear stockpiles. He's in charge of a foreign policy and his words can move markets and even start wars. He has shown no understanding of the gravity and magnitude of the office. Perhaps you don't think very bad things can happen, but history tells us a much different story, and hoping for the best didn't keep those things from happening. I'm sorry that you don't seem to understand it, but this is different.", '>>{nolivesmatterCthulhu} : This whole sub is delusional in r/politics mind Bernie can still win', ">>{appmanga} : That's true. The Electors chose to ignore the instability and unfitness of Trump just as his voters did. They were the last line of defense, and they abdicated that responsibility, as is their right.", ">>{reluctant_typer} : I will criticize him if he acts on something anti-gay. But I'm not worried, really. No one is taking away my porn or lube or sex apps. I think I'm set.", '>>{HookEmTexx} : Turns out, Trump was wrong and Obama won the popular vote. He was calling for mass protest when he incorrectly though Obama lost the popular vote but won the Presidency. Amusing that he complains now when liberals follow his lead on the electoral college.', ">>{Hans_Gucci} : lol you think i give a shit about bias or bipartisanship now? Also, I love how trump supporters and republicans at large are now experts on media bias, after you've been suckling at the tit of the most biased mainstream news organization in america for the better part of 16 years. Oh, and then after you all gobbled up fake news for an entire presidential campaign that lasted over a year, now you're all experts on calling out fake news", '>>{goody_heggety} : Because being gay is all about sex? Worry more about civil rights.', '>>{mommy2libras} : Trump is an insecure manchild with little sense. Accept it.', '>>{mommy2libras} : That\'s the thing- the things he hopes to accomplish would be terrible for many people, and not just Americans. Him "succeeding" is pretty much the opposite of what most people want. Usually success is considered accomplishing sonething you set out to do. Would I like him to do good things for the country and it\'s citizens? Hell yes. Do I want him to accomplish his goals? Absolutely not. Those goals will hurt a lot of people, including his own supporters.', '>>{mommy2libras} : Well it depends on what you mean by "fail". I do not want them to do the things they\'ve proposed. Many of them would be disastrous for a lot of people. If they succeed at accomplishing the things *they\'ve* set out to do then it won\'t be great in any way really. The only way the people win is if they fail at pretty much everything they want to do. And I mean *all* of the people, not just those opposed to him. Many of them just don\'t get how the things he\'s said he wants to do will affect them. I think they\'re stupid for not paying attention and applying a bit of critical thinking but that doesn\'t mean I want all of their lives ruined by this idiot. They don\'t see that there\'s a reason why so many are opposed to him- he told them things would be great and they believed him without actually thinking about it or bothering to think past "he\'s gonna do this thing". Decisions aren\'t made in a vacuum. Everything is tied together.', ">>{mommy2libras} : Not yet. But that's not out of the realm of possibility. Even if you aren't worried about Trump, you should have major concerns over Pence, whom Trump will allow to do much of what he likes as long as it doesn't go against Trump's actions. I'm damn sure worried about it. I would warn against waiting for them to start issuing orders before speaking up. It's a lot easier to stop sonething from happening in the first place (though that doesn't mean it's easy) than it is to try and reverse sonething already done in government. Especially with the people making the decisions right now. The way these people have no issue with absolutely horrible cabinet picks is disgusting.", ">>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : So sick of bullshit like this. We don't deny his win, only his bigotry and disgusting vulgarity.", '>>{NonHomogenized} : > worked exactly as they intended. Actually, it did the *exact opposite*. The founding fathers saw the electoral college as a means of preventing an unqualified demagogue from becoming President. Instead, it chose an unqualified demagogue against the will of the people.', '>>{iwasinmybunk} : What exactly did he say that prompted your answer?', '>>{iwasinmybunk} : Yeah but I can\'t think of a single thing he has indicated he wants to do that I agree, ergo I can\'t support him. I mean, sure if he there was common ground I\'d say "that\'s good" except I can\'t find a single piece of common ground, so a statement like this is almost meaningless. Not to mention misleading. I know what you mean, but if you say "you want him to succeed" most people would interpret that as meaning "successful is his agenda" I.e building the wall, deporting immigrants, giving the rich a huge tax break, etc.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{xahnel} : Whilst exploring, explorers accidentally discover enormous bribes Russians funneled to Hillary to get US uranium. Edit: http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/28/rosoboronexport-russias-main-weapons-exporter-gets/ http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html Putin is old school KGB. You know how they operated? If they bribed someone, that person was theirs for life. Tell me... why would the Russians sabotage the chances of someone they own sitting in the White House?', '>>{EoinODuffy_} : [The new hero of the Democrats, apparently](http://ponderingprinciples.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Joe-McCarthy.jpg)', ">>{NoYourRacist} : Are Russian conspiracy's really the best defense the Hillary cultists can come up with? So desperate it's sad. Thanks for electing Trump you morons.", '>>{the_glutton} : I don\'t understand how Trump supporters can continually say "but Uranium" and not understand how Trump is any different... and he\'s the one suggesting putting Russia in a strategically stronger position.', ">>{Schwa142} : You don't have to be pro-Trump to be anti-Hillary...", '>>{Schwa142} : You think they came up with it...? There were fed that narrative.', '>>{oranjemania} : ["The best?" Hahahahahahahahahahahaha.](https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughTrumpSpam/comments/4teoxl/a_final_response_to_the_tell_me_why_trump_is_a/)', '>>{gabagool69} : Came here to post this. Somebody needs to teach this woman the definition of irony.', ">>{xahnel} : Let's see, one person built some buildings in Russia... The other directly contributed to nuclear proliferation.", ">>{the_glutton} : Did you read the article? It's not just about Trump.", '>>{sprag80} : Nothing "tin hat" about today\'s well-researched NYT article: Russian Military Intelligence hacked the DNC servers for over a year, obtained a treasure trove of documents, and gave these stolen documents to Wikileaks for timed release just before the Democratic Convention. Why? So Putin\'s boy/pet poodle, Donald Trump, can win the national election and effectively annul NATO\'s collective security guarantee so Russia\'s sphere of influence in Europe can expand exponentially. Trump is a Manchurian Candidate. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-emails.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news', ">>{the_glutton} : As I see it, the Russians are the only ones who are actively trying to support 1 candidate in this election, a candidate who would roll back nearly 70 years of American foreign policy precedent in Europe and allow them to increase their sphere of influence for the first time since the end of the Cold War. And if you read into the facts of the uranium deal, it's clear that she had minimal impact on the sale (it had to be approved by 10 other partie), the money was donated a full 2 years before approval, and the uranium produced in the states can't even be exported outside of the US.", '>>{Gscarveguy} : Trump and Manafort are traitors...lock them up! Waterboard them!'], ['>>{Langosta_9er} : Obama: China Would Not take US Policy Shift on Taiwan Lightly', '>>{1461DaysInHell} : Obama puts on sunglasses and says "Donnie, deal with it" The donnie is going to clean up this can of beans he has opened.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I'm not sure what he was thinking. I hope they do retaliate economically.", ">>{branamuffin} : It's almost as if he's read the past 50 years of Taiwan Straight history and made a rational conclusion, and didn't shoot his mouth off without thinking of the repurcussions.", ">>{6p6ss6} : China isn't exactly known for taking things it doesn't like *lightly*. They have a civilizational history with this shit. When they wanted to build a wall, they did; we toyed with the idea for a few months and got cold feet when it turned out that it was a lot of work and expense that wouldn't be reimbursed.", '>>{IvankaDrumpf} : Some people hate Trump more than they care for America', ">>{Langosta_9er} : Are you really comparing a fortification built between 200 BCE and 1300 CE to Trump's proposed wall?", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : So Trump voters get exactly what they voted for. It's not as much a burden on my wallet as it would be theirs. I'm content with him repealing Obamacare. Some of them will die off.", ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : What of it? Do you think all liberals are bleeding hearts? I believe in things like equality. Trump voters clearly do not. They were ok with supporting a racist, or overlooking his racism in favor of other policies. Neither are ok. The sooner scum like that die off the better the world will be. There's no saving these people when they reject logic.", ">>{build-a-guac} : Trump is probably the worst racist ever. If you actually watched him speak (and not just looked at 3rd hand editorialized sources of his quotes) you would know this. I'd probably have to call you a low information voter.", ">>{wendell-t-stamps} : The plain fact of the matter is that Jina cares far more about the status of Taiwan than we do. There's no way in hell we're getting into a shooting war with them over the island, and they know that. The best strategy has been the current one: keep assistance on the DL, talk about the importance of self determination, and make ourselves valuable as a trading partner in order for them to tamp down their invasion plans. All that shit goes out the window when we make it seem like we're supporting a declaration of independence for Taiwan. Trump's national security advisers are a bunch of morons who might end up getting Taiwan hard fucked.", ">>{Langosta_9er} : No. I don't think all liberals are bleeding hearts. I'm a liberal and I don't consider myself a bleeding heart. I just think you're an asshole.", '>>{Pylons} : The current wall was actually built mostly during the Ming dynasty, in the 1400s.', '>>{6p6ss6} : I am merely copying [Trump](http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-bill-oreilly-mexico-wall-great-china) in that comparison.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I heard his comments on Judge Curiel, his family's history of housing discrimination lawsuits, his comments on Mexicans, the way he talks about black communities, and I can safely qualify the man as a racist. Whether you want to believe it or not is up to you. You can call me whatever the hell you want to. I'm not particularly interested. There's evidence to support what I say and you're not going to make it disappear or change it.", '>>{radiant_snowdrop} : Why? Because I want them to get what they voted for? Please elaborate. He tells them he will get rid of Obamacare---a service which is helping save some of their lives. The GOP wants to repeal it and has not, to my knowledge, introduced any kind of legislation that will protect people with pre-existing conditions. So some of them will die. They voted for that knowingly. Why should I feel bad for their stupidity?', '>>{build-a-guac} : > I heard his comments on Judge Curiel Comments saying that he thinks the Judge made a ridiculous ruling and the best explanation for his ruling is that the Judge is biased? > his family\'s history of housing discrimination lawsuits Does "settled out of court with no admission of guilt" not mean anything to you? > his comments on Mexicans You mean his comments on Mexicans that illegally cross the border? > the way he talks about black communities Like these quotes? > When I am President, I will work to ensure that all of our kids are treated equally, and protected equally. Every action I take, I will ask myself: does this make life better for young Americans in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Ferguson who have as much of a right to live out their dreams as any other child in America? -- > African-American citizens have sacrificed so much for this nation. They have fought and died in every war since the Revolution, and from the pews and the picket lines they have lifted up the conscience of our country in the long march for Civil Rights. Yet, too many African-Americans have been left behind. -- > It is my highest and greatest hope that the Republican Party can be the home in the future and forevermore for African-Americans and the African-American vote because I will produce, and I will get others to produce, and we know for a fact it doesn’t work with the Democrats and it certainly doesn’t work with Hillary. what a *racist*', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : I'm going to stop you from the very first one. Let's talk about judge Curiel. This was the question he was asked in regards to it. >Dickerson: Let me ask you about, what does the Mexican heritage of the judge in the Trump University case have to do with anything? >Trump: I think it has a lot to do with it. That's all that needs to be said. He is a racist. Bend over all you like to try and deny it. Go ahead. Try to omit all you can. But it's not changing anything. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2016/jun/08/donald-trumps-racial-comments-about-judge-trump-un/", '>>{build-a-guac} : > Takes one quote, refuses to put it in to context, places hands over ears, closes eyes and screams "racist" liberalism in 2016 Even this commenter I found on *youtube* gets it. > I think most people can see past the stupidity of the media. trump is clearly not claiming that a judge cannot or should not be a Mexican. >He is simply saying that the best explanation for the unfair/stupid rulings by the judge is because he a Mexican that hates me for wanting to build a wall. You want to know why people don\'t take leftists seriously when they call people racist? Well, it should be pretty obvious to you now...', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : He literally said the judge's heritage plays a role in how he was treated. That's outrageous. The judge can't be objective...because he's Mexican and opposed to Trump building a wall? Really? To what rational person does that make sense? It does not.", '>>{Samuel_L_Jewson} : >Does "settled out of court with no admission of guilt" not mean anything to you? The other guy stopped at the bit about Judge Curiel, but I gotta say something about this. Having no admission of guilt doesn\'t mean nothing was done wrong, it just means the wrong being righted was more important to the state than shaming the defendant. If the situation is remedied, is it really worth the cost of an extended trial just to get someone to admit guilt? Specifically in regards to Trump\'s discrimination lawsuit, he was told to stop by the courts *twice* before he actually stopped discriminating against black people. After the first case, the court sent undercover buyers/renters who were both white and black and found that Trump was *still* discriminating. As for all the pandering he tried to do to black people this election, actions speak louder than words.', '>>{build-a-guac} : Wow, the best people have against Trump is a lawsuit from decades ago with no admission of guilt. He\'s basically a nazi, right? I have something much more recent where Clinton called black people "superpredators." Do you care about that? You would if she were Republican. Its not whataboutism. Its demonstrating that even Clinton, who, ostensibly, you view as not racist, would be painted as a "racist Hitler neo-nazi" by the Democrats if she were a Republican. And you would probably agree with them and also help them push that narrative. This calls any accusations of racism from the Democrats in to question.'], [">>{stashtv} : Most of the GOP bullet points addressed: * Block (dollar) grants to states. * Removal of individual mandate. * Higher premiums allowed for those that allow a lapse in coverage. * Tax credits, with an income cap. * All Planned Parenthood funding removed. * Pre-existing conditions will be kept. Would like to see a single woman GOP vote against this, but I'm sure they will fall in line with the rest of the party.", ">>{m1kepro} : >All Planned Parenthood funding removed Well, this bill is dead. It can't pass the Senate without help from the Democrats, and defunding PP would be be a death sentence to most Democratic Senator's careers.", '>>{someguywithanaccount} : This seems like it\'s basically the same policy. Nothing of substance has changed. They "got rid" of the individual mandate except not really because of 30% rate hike that took its place. Some might decide that\'s worth it and forego coverage, but good luck covering old people and preexisting conditions without young people buying into the program. Expect costs to increase even faster than in the last few years if that happens. The Planned Parenthood part is messed up. Honestly I wouldn\'t care too much one way or the other except for that. What am I missing? I know it reduces some subsidies, but I\'m not sure how significantly.', '>>{VStarffin} : This plan is pretty hilarious in that its so obvious just the reaction of people who hated Obamacare. There\'s nothing coherent in here - it\'s not a coherent plan. It\'s just people looking at Obamacare and saying "hm, what do we hate about this and then how can we change just those things"? My favorite part of this, that I\'ve read so far, is their solution for the individual mandate. Apparently, this plan removes the individual mandate, but they says that if you don\'t have insurance for more than 2 months, then an insurance company is *required* to impose a 30% increase in your premiums. Think about that. Think how crazy this is on so many levels. Just to make a couple points: **First**, it doesn\'t even solve the issue. The mandate had 2 basic reasons to exist - (i) it was a way of forcing healthier people into the markets, making the markets healthier as a whole and bring down the average premium and (ii) it solved the moral hazard problem, where people would just wait until they got sick before buying insurance (because insurance companies aren\'t allowed to deny you for a pre-existing condition). This mechanism solves neither of those things. It does the opposite. All this does it let you buy into insurance when you get sick *at a slightly higher price* than the ACA does. This is...not a big incentive. If I get cancer, and I know that the costs will be $500,000 or something, who cares if my insurance premiums are now $600 per month instead of $400? That\'s not a meaningful difference compared to the liability. So people will still wait to buy in, ruining the purpose of the law. **Secondly**, this is even more unconstitutional than the individual mandate. In what universe of conservative political philosophy can the government force a private company to charge a certain class of people a higher price? That\'s insane. The individual mandate skated by as a tax because the penalty was paid *to the government*. What is the possible legal argument that this is constitutional while the individual mandate isn\'t? And this is just one part of this idiocy. Dear god. It\'s just so transparently obvious that this party doesn\'t care at all about this issue and has not thought deeply about it *at all* other than as political cudgel.', ">>{drucifer271} : It doesn't reduce subsidies, it replaces them with a tax credit - AKA, helping people who are already better off. A tax credit does jack shit for poor folks.", '>>{ebox86} : and here i was, secretly holding out for trump to unveil single payer. Oh well.', '>>{apolitic} : Well that may be the one thing that actually does it in - the fact that it would screw over healthcare companies by forcing them to take sick people when they get sick. Republicans are run by corporation profits after all not people.', '>>{someguywithanaccount} : Thanks. Would that not get them more money on their tax return? Can you get more money back than you paid?', ">>{Nurgle} : No individual mandate, pre-existing conditions allowed, and insurers can charger higher premiums to people who's coverage lapses. Sounds like a great recipe for private market death spiral.", ">>{msmithsjc} : The only good thing coming out of this that I can see is that we'll finally get a shot at single payer again. California might actually get the ball rolling on that, and the rest of the country can follow.", ">>{VStarffin} : Well, that was always the case after the ACA passed. This change is better for companies though - it's basically just the individual mandate but the money goes directly to insurance companies, not the government.", '>>{ward0630} : This is going to cause a lot of Republican infighting. Should be fun.', ">>{someguywithanaccount} : I almost want this to pass because it would be terrible for Trump's base. But that's really unfair to those that fall in that demographic but don't support him. And also the PP thing.", '>>{someguywithanaccount} : Democrats need to advertise this as a government overreach. All of the fear mongering with ACA pt. 1 was THE GOVERNMENT HAS NEVER FORCED YOU TO PURCHASE FROM A PRIVATE COMPANY BEFORE. Democrats should shout the same thing about private companies being required to charge you more money.'], ['>>{yhwhx} : I accept that tomorrow we will have a dim narcissistic grifter in the the White House.', '>>{ohheyitsdeejay} : Ok. But I will not "give him a chance".', '>>{graNheli} : He was smart enough to easily beat the best and brightest of the left.', ">>{loki8481} : > Conservatives have had to grin and bear it for eight years grinning and bearing it... yup, that's totally how I'd describe conservatives over the past 8 years. http://ugc.reveliststatic.com/gen/constrain/800/800/100/2016/11/16/15/8p/yc/phwm3gf8o42qbwe.jpg", ">>{OJSamson} : Yeah cause the GOP just grinned and neared that last 8 years. It's not like they tried to call Obama illegitimate on wild claims of being a Kenyan Muslim. Not like the were obstructionists for the past 8 years. Fuck you purposely self-unaware guy", ">>{pjoneill15} : I am not happy about it, and don't like his choices so far, but I will continue to root for his success because even though he is a jackweed, I care about my friends and myself who are American. Edit: and people who aren't Americans who will be affected by this.", '>>{lebowskisfarmhand} : What is "Something that didn\'t happen" Correct for $1000!', '>>{TinyBaron} : I only accept what he [would have wanted...](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/266034630820507648)', '>>{mbreinig} : I care about all people, not just Americans.', ">>{abigscarybat} : No thanks. I'd rather the Vladling stew in the knowledge that everyone is aware what a sham he is.", ">>{Shiny-And-New} : I'm still cheering for the whole administration to get hit with some high crimes and misdemeanors", ">>{Mossanony} : No. I won't do that. Had Kasich or Bush or any of the qualified GOP candidates won, sure, there would be grumbling but not this. Not this level of anxiety and fear. And it's not just those of us here in the USA. Trump was a rage vote against the machine. I get that. But he should never, *never* have won this office.", '>>{Deofol7} : He beat them. But the left got 3,000,000 more votes. Do not pretend like Trump "outsmarted" the left. The fact that his transition has gone so horribly (there was no plan for appointments or what to do with his businesses) is proof enough that he never thought he would win. He got the right votes in the right places, but I am pretty sure his next thought was "Fuck" now I can\'t make as much money. Starting TRUMP TV would have been so much more lucrative.', '>>{Toddisan} : Welcome to four years(or less)of opposition! Let the battle begin,', ">>{elsashardnipples} : He was smart enough to curbstomp Hillary. I wonder how many bottles of wine she's gone through in the past few months.", '>>{Hans_Gucci} : Trump is going to be a shitty president. Accept it.', '>>{dr_pepper_35} : Yeah, just like the republicans accepted Obama, right?', '>>{2RINITY} : But what does Trump succeeding mean? Does it mean we build the wall? Does it mean we break up NATO? Does it mean we deport 10 million people? Or does it mean he accomplishes very little of his pledged agenda and the economy keeps doing well in spite of that?', ">>{PowerOfTheMind} : If you actually think that is a legitimate criticism, I don't know what to tell you. Of course there are going to be a few failed investments, he dealt with many different business ideas. How about you criticize him about something that actually matters/makes sense? Criticize him for screwing over investors in Atlantic City, or for screwing over contractors for his properties.", '>>{2ndprize} : Curbstomp seems like a big word for how that all played out.', ">>{moleratical} : >When Obama was elected president, I don’t remember Republicans taking to the streets and shouting, “He’s not my president!” That's pretty much exactly what happened.", '>>{dr_pepper_35} : Careful, that is so edgy you might cut yourself. *edit-OP here was cool enough to edit the post I responded too...', ">>{thewolfshead} : When Obama won: [We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/266034630820507648)", ">>{pjoneill15} : it means succeeding at what the purpose of the President is for America and the people we influence. This isn't about him. It's about America and the people we all care about. I am not going to root against him because I don't like him. I am going to root for him and criticize him when he makes decisions I do not agree with.", '>>{firstinternational} : >best and brightest of the left You\'ve heard it here first, folks. Hillary, a "leftist" who must be seeking the revolutionary destruction of capitalism and class-society for the liberation of humanity.', ">>{SchwarzerKaffee} : The only reason he didn't lose the real estate business is because it was more expensive for the bank to let him fill than to loan him more money and pull him from the reigns. He is only successful at fleecing people. Even the opening of The Apprentice told numerous lies about his 'success'.", '>>{PowerOfTheMind} : He\'s going to be president no matter how many times you tweet, "#NotMyPresident".', ">>{abigscarybat} : Fucking squatter's going to wreck the furniture, you know he will.", ">>{PowerOfTheMind} : So you'd rather see government fail because you didn't get what you wanted? Pretty selfish. Trump is an asshole but I'd much rather see the country prosper during his time.", ">>{dfgdfgdgggg} : What's wrong with quoting the beliefs of the President elect?", ">>{Loop_Within_A_Loop} : I gave him a chance. He's already squandered it.", ">>{abigscarybat} : We will have have to be very careful about edginess in the future, since we won't be able to afford treatment for cuts or sick burns.", '>>{profgray2} : Yah, grow up just like the Republicans did during the Obama administration.. Oh, wait....', '>>{kescusay} : If by "curbstomp" you mean "luck into a unique situation where the bizarre and archaic electoral college system, which values geographic location over people, happened to be heavily tilted in his favor, allowing him to win with 3 million fewer votes," sure. In sports, that\'s called a handicap. Trump is the sports handicap president.', '>>{ohheyitsdeejay} : His "chance" includes a Muslim registry, going backwards with climate change, limiting rights for LGBT, and cozying up with Russia, among other things. So, no, I will not enable this shit by giving him a chance.', ">>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : Yeah Putin hacked people's brains like Yuri from Red Alert and mind controlled them into thinking Hillary was a terrible candidate they didn't like.", ">>{yhwhx} : In Donnie's own words: [We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/266034630820507648)", '>>{Im_Edumucated} : Lol, yep. Conservatives have all sat quietly on the sidelines and not let a peep of fucking criticism out of their mouth for 8 years. No major protests, no fabricated scandals, no gridlocking the federal fucking government. Just been waiting patiently for their return back to the White House.', '>>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : Well, if you beat your friend 306 - 232 at ping-pong you could probably reasonably yell "I curbstomped you!".', ">>{alllie} : When you have the Russians and the billionaires helping you, you don't have to be bright.", '>>{Animated_post} : This is America. The country that rejected a King in return for freedom. We definitely dont have to accept a tyrant.', ">>{dr_pepper_35} : No, Putin organized the hacking of the DNC and then funneled the information to Wikileaks. Wikileaks then released the info in a steady stream to give ammo to trump. This was organized by members of trumps campaign staff and Russian intelligence. It is all part of Putins plans to destabilize the EU, the US and NATO. And it's working.", '>>{PowerOfTheMind} : I know about all of this. But how about we be a little bit better than the Republicans that were totally about this kinda shit? Pretty low standard to hold yourself to.', ">>{Cuckinandshillin} : Actually, I want to see government fail, because people need to learn a lesson about falling for demagogues. The institution that was supposed to protect the people from this sort of douchebaggery contributed to it instead, so we're on our own.", '>>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : If there was nothing improper in there then hacking the DNC would have produced nothing.', '>>{PowerOfTheMind} : Incredibly short sighted and selfish, like the GOP 8 years ago.', ">>{radiant_snowdrop} : Playing fair doesn't win us elections. It's time to imitate their tactics.", '>>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : The electoral collage, as designed by the founders, worked exactly as they intended.', '>>{ArkadiusMaximus} : I wonder how he is going to be able to keep up with that spray tan in office', '>>{pondo13} : Gee Republicants have a terrible case of selective memory. Trump literally tweeted in 2012 the election was a sham and people should take to the streets.', ">>{DoopSlayer} : he's already failed his second, third, fourth, etc chance.", '>>{AlaDouche} : Maybe it says something more about the American people than it does about the tactics they use.', ">>{Jack_Decker_CIA} : So do the exact same with Trump if you want? It's your right to. Just know that anyone who acts that way about an American president to enough of a degree will get a nice visit from the Secret Service or SS as I like to call them", '>>{abigscarybat} : I want the country to thrive. That necessarily means I want Trump not to get a single blessed thing that he wants.', '>>{reluctant_typer} : He hasn\'t even taken office yet. I bet you think you\'re "open minded".', ">>{LeoXearo} : Democrats taking the high road and keeping the gloves on is what got us a Trump presidency. Angry people vote, scared people vote, which is why the Republican tactic of propagating hate and fear won them the government. Too many would-be democrats feel indifferent when it comes to politics, they don't feel enough of anything to bother voting and thats a problem.", ">>{AlaDouche} : You should. If you don't think you're fucked, you're sorely mistaken.", ">>{reluctant_typer} : We already have a Muslim registry (it's called the NSA), climate change is a bitch, I'm LGBT and I disagree totally I think his election is the best thing for LGBT rights ever (we finally got the republicans to shut up about it), and working with Russia when possible isn't a bad idea.", ">>{DumpsterDon} : No thanks. I don't accept an Orange Menace as my President. Accept it. Dumpster is going to get level 5 obstruction and criticism. Just like Obama got.", ">>{gonzoparenting} : the Kremlin spent millions on getting Trump elected. That's why Trump didn't have to spend as much.", '>>{goody_heggety} : Yeah because 80,000 slackers in three states stayed home. No majority. No mandate. Massive insecurity because of it.', '>>{abigscarybat} : Ah, the old "If you have nothing to fear, you have nothing to hide" defense, with a dash of ends justifying the means.', '>>{reluctant_typer} : Protecting your ego in case he succeeds and proves you wrong. How infantile.', ">>{peepalapeep} : Yeah they've been the biggest whining snowflakes for the past 8 years", '>>{goody_heggety} : If this is a friend to LGBT people, I hate to see the enemies. https://thepridela.com/2016/11/trumps-cabinet-almost-uniformly-hostile-toward-lgbt-rights/', '>>{abigscarybat} : What if you beat your friend by nearly 3 million?', '>>{abigscarybat} : Have you not been paying attention to his Cabinet appointments?', '>>{2ndprize} : They don\'t talk about that because it only counts points scored when they "weren\'t ready" so it was cheating.', '>>{ohheyitsdeejay} : Climate change is a bitch is not a valid argument', ">>{reluctant_typer} : How does this rejecting reality thing work? I didn't realize that was an option, you know, mentally.", '>>{lol_trump_voters} : > When Obama was elected president, I don’t remember Republicans taking to the streets and shouting, “He’s not my president!” I wish this poor man luck in treating his memory loss.', ">>{abigscarybat} : No, but the confirmation hearings are enough to give anyone who isn't crazy, stupid, or evil cause for alarm.", ">>{alllie} : True. But the cheapskate Hillary didn't spend anything on rigging voting machines and vote counting software. That was false economy.", ">>{_Shoot_To_Kill_} : Well if you take out the three million illegals who fraudulently voted for Hillary because they didn't want the wall to be built that gets cancelled out. So it would be like if your friend had an Mexican join him on his side of the table to help him score those points of course you are going to say those points don't count. They were illegal points by an illegal alien.", '>>{nolivesmatterCthulhu} : How dare you be gay and not support the democrats -r/politics', '>>{nolivesmatterCthulhu} : Rigging your own primary is what got us a Trump presidency', ">>{appmanga} : And what do you think we're concerned about? I'm concerned about America. I love this country. I've been critical of Republicans and Democrats. I don't think you get it: people aren't rooting against him, they're concerned about what he has proposed and how has acted. This is not your run-of-the-mill politician; this is a mentally ill authoritarian who is now in charge of the world's largest military and it's nuclear stockpiles. He's in charge of a foreign policy and his words can move markets and even start wars. He has shown no understanding of the gravity and magnitude of the office. Perhaps you don't think very bad things can happen, but history tells us a much different story, and hoping for the best didn't keep those things from happening. I'm sorry that you don't seem to understand it, but this is different.", '>>{nolivesmatterCthulhu} : This whole sub is delusional in r/politics mind Bernie can still win', ">>{appmanga} : That's true. The Electors chose to ignore the instability and unfitness of Trump just as his voters did. They were the last line of defense, and they abdicated that responsibility, as is their right.", ">>{reluctant_typer} : I will criticize him if he acts on something anti-gay. But I'm not worried, really. No one is taking away my porn or lube or sex apps. I think I'm set.", '>>{HookEmTexx} : Turns out, Trump was wrong and Obama won the popular vote. He was calling for mass protest when he incorrectly though Obama lost the popular vote but won the Presidency. Amusing that he complains now when liberals follow his lead on the electoral college.', ">>{Hans_Gucci} : lol you think i give a shit about bias or bipartisanship now? Also, I love how trump supporters and republicans at large are now experts on media bias, after you've been suckling at the tit of the most biased mainstream news organization in america for the better part of 16 years. Oh, and then after you all gobbled up fake news for an entire presidential campaign that lasted over a year, now you're all experts on calling out fake news", '>>{goody_heggety} : Because being gay is all about sex? Worry more about civil rights.', '>>{mommy2libras} : Trump is an insecure manchild with little sense. Accept it.', '>>{mommy2libras} : That\'s the thing- the things he hopes to accomplish would be terrible for many people, and not just Americans. Him "succeeding" is pretty much the opposite of what most people want. Usually success is considered accomplishing sonething you set out to do. Would I like him to do good things for the country and it\'s citizens? Hell yes. Do I want him to accomplish his goals? Absolutely not. Those goals will hurt a lot of people, including his own supporters.', '>>{mommy2libras} : Well it depends on what you mean by "fail". I do not want them to do the things they\'ve proposed. Many of them would be disastrous for a lot of people. If they succeed at accomplishing the things *they\'ve* set out to do then it won\'t be great in any way really. The only way the people win is if they fail at pretty much everything they want to do. And I mean *all* of the people, not just those opposed to him. Many of them just don\'t get how the things he\'s said he wants to do will affect them. I think they\'re stupid for not paying attention and applying a bit of critical thinking but that doesn\'t mean I want all of their lives ruined by this idiot. They don\'t see that there\'s a reason why so many are opposed to him- he told them things would be great and they believed him without actually thinking about it or bothering to think past "he\'s gonna do this thing". Decisions aren\'t made in a vacuum. Everything is tied together.', ">>{mommy2libras} : Not yet. But that's not out of the realm of possibility. Even if you aren't worried about Trump, you should have major concerns over Pence, whom Trump will allow to do much of what he likes as long as it doesn't go against Trump's actions. I'm damn sure worried about it. I would warn against waiting for them to start issuing orders before speaking up. It's a lot easier to stop sonething from happening in the first place (though that doesn't mean it's easy) than it is to try and reverse sonething already done in government. Especially with the people making the decisions right now. The way these people have no issue with absolutely horrible cabinet picks is disgusting.", ">>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : So sick of bullshit like this. We don't deny his win, only his bigotry and disgusting vulgarity.", '>>{NonHomogenized} : > worked exactly as they intended. Actually, it did the *exact opposite*. The founding fathers saw the electoral college as a means of preventing an unqualified demagogue from becoming President. Instead, it chose an unqualified demagogue against the will of the people.', '>>{iwasinmybunk} : What exactly did he say that prompted your answer?', '>>{iwasinmybunk} : Yeah but I can\'t think of a single thing he has indicated he wants to do that I agree, ergo I can\'t support him. I mean, sure if he there was common ground I\'d say "that\'s good" except I can\'t find a single piece of common ground, so a statement like this is almost meaningless. Not to mention misleading. I know what you mean, but if you say "you want him to succeed" most people would interpret that as meaning "successful is his agenda" I.e building the wall, deporting immigrants, giving the rich a huge tax break, etc.']]

classify and reply

[">>{MrHaxx1} : Right, that's also what I'm thinking. But I just added in my post, there's the thing about Battery Usage not working at all. It said that apps would appear after some time, but it never happened. I'm thinking it should do that regardless of faulty battery, as it's not the battery itself that reports how much power there's left.", ">>{ImVinnie} : I did especially when I would ride my bike. It wouldn't fit in my bike jersey", '>>{NickCageIsAWoman} : The Love Turntable Designed By Yves Behar Rotates ON Your Records', '>>{rlp703} : I had a similar issue. I took it to the Genius Bar and they replaced my phone. They will run some diagnostics and check for water damage.', ">>{kiddfroster} : Maybe an iOS restore is in order too? Don't restore from a backup or anything, just give it a fresh start. It's odd that a year old phone would be exhibiting this behavior.", '>>{ReliableSource} : Nope. I love it and will never be able to go back to a smaller phone.', '>>{olster_} : Great to hear, what colour do you have out of interest', ">>{tuctrohs} : Sneak preview of the patent I'm filing tomorrow: Replace roads with rows of powered wheels, and then replace the wheels on the bottoms of cars with asphalt pads. It sounds like a dumb idea, but it will be connected to Bluetooth and controlled by an app. You'll love it.", ">>{Lily566} : Trump officials draw up 'extreme vetting' for tourists and visitors", '>>{MrHaxx1} : Yeah, I tried that. Completely fresh, where iTunes downloaded the ipsw, without restoring any backups, then I restored in DFU mode, just to make completely sure it was wiped. No difference.', ">>{kiddfroster} : That's strange. :/ Wish I had more insight to help you!", ">>{johnrose81} : This defeats the purpose of records. I don't want bluetooth. I don't want an app. I don't want to skip tracks. I don't want Shazaam. I want to put a record on and listen to the whole thing. It's a genuine effort to put on a record; enjoy it.", '>>{VROF} : I wonder if we will ever recover from this nightmare Presidency and the corrupt Republicans enabling it in the House and Senate.', '>>{dolphins3} : They certainly seem intent on blowing the brains out of the U.S. tourism and conference industry.', '>>{ghjhb2} : Why Is the New York Times Lying about Trump? |', ">>{helpfulkorn} : Waaaaaaaa one of the oldest and most respected American publications said mean things about my cult leader waaaaaaaa! No fairs! Big meanies!!!! Waaaaaaaa! It's totally lies, TOTALLY!", ">>{TheBigMaestro} : This is so ridiculous, I can't tell if it's a spoof of other ridiculous kickstarters or not. From the crazy dancing lady down to the smug designers of a completely unnecessary innovation, this hits all its marks squarely in the center.", '>>{ReliableSource} : Had a space gray 6s+, now a black 7+ (I hate white bezels).', ">>{goingdiving} : I did have a trip planned for both Vegas in October and Colorado November next year. I won't be going now.", '>>{flying-potato} : This trash will kill your records in a couple plays', ">>{MrHaxx1} : Ah well, I'll take it down to the local repair store. They run diagnostics for free. Thanks for trying, tho, it's appreciated.", ">>{altuniverseyou} : Tourism is a huge industry but it's probably considered librul.", '>>{altuniverseyou} : But both have legal marijuana. If you can get there, you know, maybe?', '>>{dwf1967} : $220 billion a year Trump just pissed away. RIP tourism industry.', '>>{thewizardofash} : Just exchanged my 7 for the Plus. No way am I going back.', ">>{MrHaxx1} : Well, my friend got the phone from his older brother, who got it from his company, so it's really not an option for me to take it a Genius Bar, also we don't have Apple Stores in Denmark, only Apple Authorized resellers. I'll take it down to a local repair shop, they offer free diagnostics. I hope it won't be too expensive.", ">>{goingdiving} : Amsterdam is closer and inside Schengen, I think if Mary Jane was the pull factor I'd go there... :)", '>>{JeffBuckleysGhost} : Haha, looks like a joke product for the As Seen on TV section of Walgreens.', '>>{punbasedname} : TL;DR All politicians are liars. Donald Trump lies more than a normal politician. Some rehashed Trump talking points.', '>>{Neksa} : The needle is what\'s convinced people for over 150 years, it is warm and soulful sound that is unique and that *can not be replaced by something digital* "Well, once you capture the sound what do you do with it? You *process it in a way that allows it to communicate to a bluetooth speaker or to a phone*..." LOL', '>>{ImVinnie} : Yeah, I hate to safety pin my jersey shut because I was afraid it will fall out', '>>{10390} : Also hits universities, events like the Olympics, & international businesses. Galactically stupid with zero benefit.', '>>{NickCageIsAWoman} : The codec used does not compress as standard codecs do. It allows the sound to retain its natural warmth.', ">>{makeramen} : I've had this issue recently too, just been doing fully discharge to 0% for a few days and it's gotten a lot better. If you don't get to 0, just charge for a bit until you can turn on, then keep discharging until you reach 0. Also after a full discharge, fully charge to 100%, leave for an hour, then do a hard reset (hold power and home for a few seconds until phone reboots to apple logo). After doing this for a few days in a row my battery meter seemed to finally get calibrated again.", ">>{Rupperrt} : answer questions about their ideology and hand over social media passwords No thank you, Gestapo-Trump, I'll travel to BC instead of Cali in the future.", '>>{RedditReturn} : Already dropped all plans to travel to the US until the King in Orange is deposed. I hope the US is still there to visit afterwards.', '>>{NickCageIsAWoman} : I find it pretty cool, especially given that no weight is on the needle so the record life is extended.', '>>{rdevaughn} : Fake news predicated on wishful speculation. Embarrassing. Next.', '>>{squarepeg0000} : Calling Trump’s insistence that millions of people voted illegally a "bit of semi-private braggadocio" shows somebody\'s in denial about our President, and it isn\'t the NY Times.', ">>{CountyOrganHarvester} : I'm not sure of the brand name, better ask Colonel Campbell.", ">>{trumps_madeinchina} : Now let's not be too critical of OP because he's a special snowflake", '>>{Kolt_Raynor} : What did you personally sacrifice to make that comment?', '>>{highmoonpurple} : If you have a properly balanced tone arm on a real turntable there is very little weight on the stylus', ">>{MrHaxx1} : Well, I'll have the local repair guy look at it tomorrow. That seems faster. If he doesn't say anything useful, I'll try to deplete the battery a couple of more times, even though it's a really cumbersome process. Thanks for the suggestion!", '>>{Beluchi26} : I had the 7 . I came from the galaxy s7 that\'s why I was not really satisfied with the 4,7. I wanted a bigger screen for reddit,YouTube and so on. Went out and looked at the plus (when I had the galaxy s7 I never wanted a s7 edge because it felt too big). Played half an hour with the plus (in the store) because I was not sure if I should buy it or not. I said f... It and bought it. Went home put all on the plus. I was happy. First day with the plus I was happy but something was not perfect many times a day I was thinking it\'s too big. Came home and took the 7 in the hand and it felt "better" in the hand. After 24 hours I started to regret the move to the plus. I didn\'t know what to do. Should I keep or bring it back and keep the 7. I kept using it for couple more days and decide after that. Now I will never go back to the 7 or a smaller phone. Just a couple of days and I was so used to the bigger phone and will not go back. My mother is also happy because she got my 7, so everyone is happy now :) :) tldr: went from the 7 to the 7 plus. Took me some time to get used. Now I can\'t think of going back to smaller phone', '>>{NickCageIsAWoman} : Okay, but this puts 0 weight on it. The design allows it to touch the surface but not be weighted to it.', '>>{Jedi_Ewok} : Hey if all the moving bits were set in the ground cars would be a lot cheaper. Screw it, who needs cars? Grab a trash can lid and get going!', ">>{kozmo1313} : this article is preposterous. it isn't even disputing all the lies. it's just trying to cast them (incorrectly) as braggadocio and unsubstantiated statements. saying all politicians do it isn't a defense. it's an excuse.", '>>{helpfulkorn} : To make the comment? Nothing. But my weekly volunteer gig at Habitat for Humanity starts in about two hours. This was for funzies, I save the actual work for benefiting people in need.', ">>{joaoalm} : so, what happened? I bought an 6s plus from a friend and in the last week I've seen the same behaviour as you", ">>{thenextguy} : Have a long-haired, crazy-dancing girl in the video and you'll make millions.", '>>{NikeSwish} : No, I actually wish it was a tad bigger tbh. Won\'t ever go back below 5".', '>>{craaates} : Exactly what I came here to say. This looks like a teched up version of the Vinyl Killer.', ">>{Moldiemom} : But,but,but, that's what his supporters expect seems to be another excuse.", ">>{simplecocktails} : I actually do. I've had a 6+ for a little over a year and I initially loved it because of the extra battery life and screen size (I'm 40 so eyesight's not perfect anymore)....BUT I'm tired of not really being able to keep it in my pocket, especially when sitting down. I'm a guy and wear snug (but not skinny) jeans most of the time, and it's just too big to live in my front pocket. I always have to take it out when I sit down. When I replace it, I'll go with a 7, maybe even an SE. I don't think I'll miss the size, but I will definitely miss the battery life. And I'm a little sad about the optical zoom camera.", '>>{Creddit999} : It is a lie at this point, IMHO. 45 has produced no evidence to back up his claims of fraud. Repeating it just digs 45 deeper into the world of "lying" vs. mis-statement. Add to that the ongoing series of outright untruths that 45 insists on spewing over the past 9 YEARS, and you have a major credibility issue with this president. To call 45\'s untruths lies makes sense to me, since at this point, his intent is clear: mislead and obfuscate on nearly every issue.', ">>{Jottor} : It's still 0's and 1's.", ">>{MrHaxx1} : The repair guy had no idea what was wrong, because the battery seemed fine in the diagnostics. In the end, I didn't want to bother with it, so I gave the phone back to my friend and bought a Xiaomi Mi5 instead.", '>>{professorrumham} : Just another attempt by the administrations lackies to discredit the media so you only get your "facts" from twitter.', ">>{SlootHunter65} : I did, I had a 6s+ and dropped back down to a 7. The screen wasn't too big, but the bezels were outrageous", ">>{jackduloz} : We need to come up with a better moniker than '45'. This is going to sound like a dad joke, but calling him 45 suggests he's half right, that's just giving him too much credit.", ">>{AJEstes} : 'Mr. Trump, what about when you said ___' 'I never said that' *Queue video of him saying exactly that* They call him a liar because he bloody lies.", '>>{Creddit999} : I do think a good policy at this point is to no longer us his name. Suggestions welcome.', '>>{nanaclifford} : Also known as the Shaggy Defense. I think Trump has found his [new press secretary](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv5fqunQ_4I)', '>>{Somethingcleaver1} : Went from my little 5s to the 6s+ and for about a day I was unable to use the phone. Now in my 7+ I love the size completely (plus Apple usually adds extra features to the plus which is, you might says, a plus)', ">>{stek9} : I did. I had the 6S+ for a week before realizing that not being able to use my phone one handed is a deal breaker for me. It was really hard to go back to the 6S but after a week with it I was used to the smaller screen again and I'm pretty happy with the size now.", ">>{Mintergirl42} : No way. I did at first when I got my 7 plus, but after a few days, I couldn't even tell that it was a bigger sized phone anymore. It now feels normal and it's perfect. I love it and I will never go back to the smaller phone! I'm a female with average sized hands and I can use the phone one handed with no problems honestly, even while having an otterbox case on it! Lol"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{NickCageIsAWoman} : The Love Turntable Designed By Yves Behar Rotates ON Your Records', ">>{tuctrohs} : Sneak preview of the patent I'm filing tomorrow: Replace roads with rows of powered wheels, and then replace the wheels on the bottoms of cars with asphalt pads. It sounds like a dumb idea, but it will be connected to Bluetooth and controlled by an app. You'll love it.", ">>{johnrose81} : This defeats the purpose of records. I don't want bluetooth. I don't want an app. I don't want to skip tracks. I don't want Shazaam. I want to put a record on and listen to the whole thing. It's a genuine effort to put on a record; enjoy it.", ">>{TheBigMaestro} : This is so ridiculous, I can't tell if it's a spoof of other ridiculous kickstarters or not. From the crazy dancing lady down to the smug designers of a completely unnecessary innovation, this hits all its marks squarely in the center.", '>>{flying-potato} : This trash will kill your records in a couple plays', '>>{JeffBuckleysGhost} : Haha, looks like a joke product for the As Seen on TV section of Walgreens.', '>>{Neksa} : The needle is what\'s convinced people for over 150 years, it is warm and soulful sound that is unique and that *can not be replaced by something digital* "Well, once you capture the sound what do you do with it? You *process it in a way that allows it to communicate to a bluetooth speaker or to a phone*..." LOL', '>>{NickCageIsAWoman} : The codec used does not compress as standard codecs do. It allows the sound to retain its natural warmth.', '>>{NickCageIsAWoman} : I find it pretty cool, especially given that no weight is on the needle so the record life is extended.', ">>{CountyOrganHarvester} : I'm not sure of the brand name, better ask Colonel Campbell.", '>>{highmoonpurple} : If you have a properly balanced tone arm on a real turntable there is very little weight on the stylus', '>>{NickCageIsAWoman} : Okay, but this puts 0 weight on it. The design allows it to touch the surface but not be weighted to it.', '>>{Jedi_Ewok} : Hey if all the moving bits were set in the ground cars would be a lot cheaper. Screw it, who needs cars? Grab a trash can lid and get going!', ">>{thenextguy} : Have a long-haired, crazy-dancing girl in the video and you'll make millions.", '>>{craaates} : Exactly what I came here to say. This looks like a teched up version of the Vinyl Killer.', ">>{Jottor} : It's still 0's and 1's."], [">>{MrHaxx1} : Right, that's also what I'm thinking. But I just added in my post, there's the thing about Battery Usage not working at all. It said that apps would appear after some time, but it never happened. I'm thinking it should do that regardless of faulty battery, as it's not the battery itself that reports how much power there's left.", '>>{rlp703} : I had a similar issue. I took it to the Genius Bar and they replaced my phone. They will run some diagnostics and check for water damage.', ">>{kiddfroster} : Maybe an iOS restore is in order too? Don't restore from a backup or anything, just give it a fresh start. It's odd that a year old phone would be exhibiting this behavior.", '>>{MrHaxx1} : Yeah, I tried that. Completely fresh, where iTunes downloaded the ipsw, without restoring any backups, then I restored in DFU mode, just to make completely sure it was wiped. No difference.', ">>{kiddfroster} : That's strange. :/ Wish I had more insight to help you!", ">>{MrHaxx1} : Ah well, I'll take it down to the local repair store. They run diagnostics for free. Thanks for trying, tho, it's appreciated.", ">>{MrHaxx1} : Well, my friend got the phone from his older brother, who got it from his company, so it's really not an option for me to take it a Genius Bar, also we don't have Apple Stores in Denmark, only Apple Authorized resellers. I'll take it down to a local repair shop, they offer free diagnostics. I hope it won't be too expensive.", ">>{makeramen} : I've had this issue recently too, just been doing fully discharge to 0% for a few days and it's gotten a lot better. If you don't get to 0, just charge for a bit until you can turn on, then keep discharging until you reach 0. Also after a full discharge, fully charge to 100%, leave for an hour, then do a hard reset (hold power and home for a few seconds until phone reboots to apple logo). After doing this for a few days in a row my battery meter seemed to finally get calibrated again.", ">>{MrHaxx1} : Well, I'll have the local repair guy look at it tomorrow. That seems faster. If he doesn't say anything useful, I'll try to deplete the battery a couple of more times, even though it's a really cumbersome process. Thanks for the suggestion!", ">>{joaoalm} : so, what happened? I bought an 6s plus from a friend and in the last week I've seen the same behaviour as you", ">>{MrHaxx1} : The repair guy had no idea what was wrong, because the battery seemed fine in the diagnostics. In the end, I didn't want to bother with it, so I gave the phone back to my friend and bought a Xiaomi Mi5 instead."], [">>{Lily566} : Trump officials draw up 'extreme vetting' for tourists and visitors", '>>{VROF} : I wonder if we will ever recover from this nightmare Presidency and the corrupt Republicans enabling it in the House and Senate.', '>>{dolphins3} : They certainly seem intent on blowing the brains out of the U.S. tourism and conference industry.', ">>{goingdiving} : I did have a trip planned for both Vegas in October and Colorado November next year. I won't be going now.", ">>{altuniverseyou} : Tourism is a huge industry but it's probably considered librul.", '>>{altuniverseyou} : But both have legal marijuana. If you can get there, you know, maybe?', '>>{dwf1967} : $220 billion a year Trump just pissed away. RIP tourism industry.', ">>{goingdiving} : Amsterdam is closer and inside Schengen, I think if Mary Jane was the pull factor I'd go there... :)", '>>{10390} : Also hits universities, events like the Olympics, & international businesses. Galactically stupid with zero benefit.', ">>{Rupperrt} : answer questions about their ideology and hand over social media passwords No thank you, Gestapo-Trump, I'll travel to BC instead of Cali in the future.", '>>{RedditReturn} : Already dropped all plans to travel to the US until the King in Orange is deposed. I hope the US is still there to visit afterwards.'], [">>{ImVinnie} : I did especially when I would ride my bike. It wouldn't fit in my bike jersey", '>>{ReliableSource} : Nope. I love it and will never be able to go back to a smaller phone.', '>>{olster_} : Great to hear, what colour do you have out of interest', '>>{ReliableSource} : Had a space gray 6s+, now a black 7+ (I hate white bezels).', '>>{thewizardofash} : Just exchanged my 7 for the Plus. No way am I going back.', '>>{ImVinnie} : Yeah, I hate to safety pin my jersey shut because I was afraid it will fall out', '>>{Beluchi26} : I had the 7 . I came from the galaxy s7 that\'s why I was not really satisfied with the 4,7. I wanted a bigger screen for reddit,YouTube and so on. Went out and looked at the plus (when I had the galaxy s7 I never wanted a s7 edge because it felt too big). Played half an hour with the plus (in the store) because I was not sure if I should buy it or not. I said f... It and bought it. Went home put all on the plus. I was happy. First day with the plus I was happy but something was not perfect many times a day I was thinking it\'s too big. Came home and took the 7 in the hand and it felt "better" in the hand. After 24 hours I started to regret the move to the plus. I didn\'t know what to do. Should I keep or bring it back and keep the 7. I kept using it for couple more days and decide after that. Now I will never go back to the 7 or a smaller phone. Just a couple of days and I was so used to the bigger phone and will not go back. My mother is also happy because she got my 7, so everyone is happy now :) :) tldr: went from the 7 to the 7 plus. Took me some time to get used. Now I can\'t think of going back to smaller phone', '>>{NikeSwish} : No, I actually wish it was a tad bigger tbh. Won\'t ever go back below 5".', ">>{simplecocktails} : I actually do. I've had a 6+ for a little over a year and I initially loved it because of the extra battery life and screen size (I'm 40 so eyesight's not perfect anymore)....BUT I'm tired of not really being able to keep it in my pocket, especially when sitting down. I'm a guy and wear snug (but not skinny) jeans most of the time, and it's just too big to live in my front pocket. I always have to take it out when I sit down. When I replace it, I'll go with a 7, maybe even an SE. I don't think I'll miss the size, but I will definitely miss the battery life. And I'm a little sad about the optical zoom camera.", ">>{SlootHunter65} : I did, I had a 6s+ and dropped back down to a 7. The screen wasn't too big, but the bezels were outrageous", '>>{Somethingcleaver1} : Went from my little 5s to the 6s+ and for about a day I was unable to use the phone. Now in my 7+ I love the size completely (plus Apple usually adds extra features to the plus which is, you might says, a plus)', ">>{stek9} : I did. I had the 6S+ for a week before realizing that not being able to use my phone one handed is a deal breaker for me. It was really hard to go back to the 6S but after a week with it I was used to the smaller screen again and I'm pretty happy with the size now.", ">>{Mintergirl42} : No way. I did at first when I got my 7 plus, but after a few days, I couldn't even tell that it was a bigger sized phone anymore. It now feels normal and it's perfect. I love it and I will never go back to the smaller phone! I'm a female with average sized hands and I can use the phone one handed with no problems honestly, even while having an otterbox case on it! Lol"], ['>>{ghjhb2} : Why Is the New York Times Lying about Trump? |', ">>{helpfulkorn} : Waaaaaaaa one of the oldest and most respected American publications said mean things about my cult leader waaaaaaaa! No fairs! Big meanies!!!! Waaaaaaaa! It's totally lies, TOTALLY!", '>>{punbasedname} : TL;DR All politicians are liars. Donald Trump lies more than a normal politician. Some rehashed Trump talking points.', '>>{rdevaughn} : Fake news predicated on wishful speculation. Embarrassing. Next.', '>>{squarepeg0000} : Calling Trump’s insistence that millions of people voted illegally a "bit of semi-private braggadocio" shows somebody\'s in denial about our President, and it isn\'t the NY Times.', ">>{trumps_madeinchina} : Now let's not be too critical of OP because he's a special snowflake", '>>{Kolt_Raynor} : What did you personally sacrifice to make that comment?', ">>{kozmo1313} : this article is preposterous. it isn't even disputing all the lies. it's just trying to cast them (incorrectly) as braggadocio and unsubstantiated statements. saying all politicians do it isn't a defense. it's an excuse.", '>>{helpfulkorn} : To make the comment? Nothing. But my weekly volunteer gig at Habitat for Humanity starts in about two hours. This was for funzies, I save the actual work for benefiting people in need.', ">>{Moldiemom} : But,but,but, that's what his supporters expect seems to be another excuse.", '>>{Creddit999} : It is a lie at this point, IMHO. 45 has produced no evidence to back up his claims of fraud. Repeating it just digs 45 deeper into the world of "lying" vs. mis-statement. Add to that the ongoing series of outright untruths that 45 insists on spewing over the past 9 YEARS, and you have a major credibility issue with this president. To call 45\'s untruths lies makes sense to me, since at this point, his intent is clear: mislead and obfuscate on nearly every issue.', '>>{professorrumham} : Just another attempt by the administrations lackies to discredit the media so you only get your "facts" from twitter.', ">>{jackduloz} : We need to come up with a better moniker than '45'. This is going to sound like a dad joke, but calling him 45 suggests he's half right, that's just giving him too much credit.", ">>{AJEstes} : 'Mr. Trump, what about when you said ___' 'I never said that' *Queue video of him saying exactly that* They call him a liar because he bloody lies.", '>>{Creddit999} : I do think a good policy at this point is to no longer us his name. Suggestions welcome.', '>>{nanaclifford} : Also known as the Shaggy Defense. I think Trump has found his [new press secretary](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv5fqunQ_4I)']]

classify and reply

[">>{DrJarns} : Lewandowski: We Can Say 'Merry Christmas' Again Under Trump", '>>{RynheartTheReluctant} : >Facing a deadline to do away with a law that turned North Carolina into a national pariah by denying the right of transgender people to use public restrooms of their choice, state lawmakers rashly settled on a terrible compromise. >On Thursday, they repealed the law in name but not in substance, hoping to assuage organizations and employers that have boycotted the state to protest its discriminatory law. The National Collegiate Athletic Association had given state politicians until Thursday to get rid of the law before it would resume holding championship games in the state.', '>>{polar8} : Poor battery life even after battery replacement and iOS restore', ">>{rush42} : >The law’s revision would deprive North Carolinians of protection from discrimination for years, and retains the odious notion that transgender people are inherently dangerous. No, no, no! Nobody thinks transgender ppl are dangerous. They are afraid of male sexual predators claiming to be transgender so they can get into women's restrooms and victimize women and children. This is a bill about safety, not discrimination. http://www.dailywire.com/news/5190/5-times-transgender-men-abused-women-and-children-amanda-prestigiacomo", '>>{Huck77} : You could always say merry xmas. That whole thing is ridiculous.', ">>{European_Sanderista} : Sanders: Trump voter fraud claims 'disgraceful and unfounded nonsense'", '>>{mhwtexplode} : Oh just fuck off, nobody stopped you before. These people think this is almost the second coming, next thing you know he will be preforming miracles.', '>>{lipring69} : > Where do these people live that justifies this "war on xmas" narrative they push? Fox News? Or they just go to the store and get upset when people say happy holidays.', '>>{Quexana} : Finally the truth about the bill is starting to come out.', ">>{MakingAmericaGreat4U} : I don't get it. Were we saying something different until now?", ">>{DebussySIMiami} : You gotta give it to them, Trump's people know their base is a bunch of morons, and they reinforce their stupid beliefs daily.", ">>{ShyGuy322} : When will Bernie go away? That's the million dollar question.", ">>{ShyGuy322} : Well, old man Sanders is like 95. He won't live forever. As far as his political career goes, there are only so many moronic liberal arts students that he can bamboozle with his false promises of free education and healthcare.", '>>{Johnny_Guano} : Yea but the people voted that shtick into the highest office. You expect Trump to suddenly stop what got him to the top? Sanders needs to learn and emulate. Voters aren\'t interested in truth and practical ideas. We are a nation Blanche Duboises ... we don\'t want realism. We want magic. And Trump replied "Yes, yes, magic. I try to give that to people. I do misrepresent things. I don\'t tell truths. I tell what ought to be truth."', '>>{floridalegend} : So instead of dealing worth male sexual predators, the right continually demonize transsexuals. Nice try though.', ">>{TwoToneTrump} : FBI finds nothing illicit in Michael Flynn's calls with Russian ambassador", '>>{LittleShrub} : Don’t Be Fooled by North Carolina, There Is No Repeal of The Anti-Trans HB2, Only More Discrimination. https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/dont-be-fooled-north-carolina-there-no-repeal-anti-trans-hb2-only-more', '>>{conanthecnidarian} : The same FBI that helped get Donald Trump elected?', ">>{wtfwasdat} : > He won't live forever. Legends never die.", '>>{shmangit69} : I would have taken it to an Apple Store to get it checked out. But I think you may have voided your warranty by replacing the battery yourself.', ">>{Qunidaye} : you obviously never lost any loved ones during the war on Christmas. My brother died instantly from a generic starbuck's happy holidays IED cup. never saw it coming", '>>{stonedhillbilly} : thanks comey! luv ya buddy -donny edit: 2 hours later, surprise surprise, the next story out today... comey keeps his job', '>>{yungfucky} : Shoulda gone to an Apple store for a replacement, too late now.', ">>{wytxcook} : Bernie's got roughly 50 days of relevancy left. Then he goes back to being one of two (I)'s in the Senate controlled by Republicans.", '>>{dr_pepper_35} : If you say it three times with the lights out, Santa will appear and stab you with a candy cane.', ">>{RON-PAUL-IN-MY-ANUS} : Taking millions of dollars from college students after your loss became all but guaranteed and then endorsing a career politician after selling a political revolution.....now that's disgraceful.", ">>{Astalano} : Bernie Sanders' whole movement is also disgraceful and unfounded nonsense, so hey, something in common.", ">>{Heyyitsmesusan} : What they said ^. It's no wonder battery life is bad when one orders a cheap battery and expects it to be good. You get what you pay for.", ">>{Johnny_Guano} : His movement? You sound like Trump. Your and his proctologist bill must be through the roof. At least Bernie would've helped you pay for it.", '>>{poop__fist} : How much would a battery replacement on a 6+ run me?', ">>{Johnny_Guano} : Good Jews don't die ... they get resurrected. Even Trump voters know that.", '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Oh so were back to not believing the intelligence agencies again? This subs mood changes depending upon the story. Just wanted to know what the current stance is.', '>>{PolishRobinHood} : Okay. So with this law a male predator just claims to have been born a woman and is just complying with the law. Can\'t verify his claims without checking his birth certificate, which no one cares. So the concern for "safety" makes it easier for what they fear AND demonizes trans people. Such an improvement.', ">>{Inumbrate} : There was a [bit on Trevor Noah](https://youtu.be/-oyLA2X3sd4?t=4m25s) about this too. It's pretty messed up.", ">>{WatashiWaWatashi} : Cut the bullshit. Everyone knows that the rare someone going into a bathroom with the intent to break a law isn't going to be stopped by these bills, and instead they're designed to keep an already marginalized group of people from participating in society without being socially ostracized. If this was really about safety we'd ban GOP congressmen from public bathrooms, what with all the awful scandals they end up perpetrating in them.", ">>{yungfucky} : 79 from apple, covers both battery and installation costs, but they won't touch it if you have 3rd party parts in it.", ">>{RobeFlax} : The intelligence agencies don't always agree, don't always have the same ends, and don't always work together.", ">>{poop__fist} : I was expecting to pay more than 79. That's not so bad. I'm sure it takes several days though", ">>{californianion} : Yuuup. This would be music to my mom's ears.", '>>{MasterFwiffo} : The logs said: Merry Christmas! We "hope" to get you a "present.". Would you like to "go bowling" on "Tuesday"? Checks out.', '>>{yungfucky} : Well if you go to the Apple store they do it right there', '>>{Trumpologist} : The stance has always been the same? Anything against Trump goes for these people. Lol they kept citing Romney and Palin to bash Trump.', '>>{AlternativeHillbilly} : ITT: Attacks on Bernie with no proof that millions of people voted illegally.', ">>{rush42} : Hey I didn't say it made any sense I'm just telling u guys what the issue is.", ">>{rush42} : Um yeah bc I'm a conservative on a liberal subreddit. AND Im NOT saying that I believe this! I'm explaining why ppl supported the law.", '>>{dr_pepper_35} : Ah, yes. Christians, truly the most oppressed of Americans.', '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : Thank God. 0bummer personally put me in a FEMUR camp for saying "Merry Christmas".', '>>{xakare} : He whines more when he wins than he does when he loses.', ">>{dwntwn_dine_ent_dist} : The issue is that it doesn't make any sense.", '>>{wpatter6} : Weird how those two things never seem to line up this year', '>>{poop__fist} : So you can get it done in one day?', ">>{Kofile} : Even if you don't have AppleCare, the replacement is $79? I thought it was $329 for some reason", ">>{Astalano} : Yeah, before Bernie's government tanked under its own incompetence and inefficiency.", '>>{Johnny_Guano} : I want magic. Trump gave me magic. A fun circus ride. Who cares if he and his Wall St. buddies do a management buyout of our country and rename it Trumpland and make us his employees in a giant casino?', '>>{Lvl_69_Meme_Master} : What an informative and insightful comment. Thank you for contributing high-quality comments such as this to /r/politics. We are truly benefited as a community from your brilliant mind.', '>>{draztico} : Supposely, there was this pc rumor where ypu had to say "happy holidays" so you don\'t offend certain demographics. Not sure if true though', '>>{miltedmalkball} : It\'s almost like a discussion forum contains people with different viewpoints. Shocking. Kind of wrecks your "the other" scapegoat meme though.', ">>{branamuffin} : I'm glad America's #1 priority is being tackled, the War on Christmas!", ">>{orangesarenotnasty} : They are hardly experts. They are just liars that lie, get caught, half admit they lied, and then proceed to say the same lie again. Propaganda should be able to manipulate people across the IQ spectrum. What the Trump team has done is manipulate the dumbest among us. People of average intelligence aren't, and didn't, fall for this nonsense.", '>>{ssldvr} : Other than the fact that he called the Russian ambassador 5 times in one day and works for the GOP candidate/president?', ">>{Lvl_69_Meme_Master} : Alleging that millions of fraudulent votes were cast without offering proof...now that's disgraceful.", '>>{kwhoo} : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.8886 > [What is this?](https://pastebin.com/64GuVi2F/02641)', ">>{ExpressRabbit} : This law does nothing to stop the problem you're referencing.", '>>{crusoe} : Rapists will rape with or without this bill. It does nothing to protect women.', '>>{mrslappydick} : RIP to all those we lost in the War on Christmas', '>>{ethical_consumer} : Yeah because a rapist is gonna be stopped by a bathroom law. Fucking genius.', ">>{PolishRobinHood} : I don't see how that refutes anything I said.", ">>{rush42} : >Fucking genius. Were u referring to me or the ppl who made this law? Bc I didn't say I believed it. I'm just telling you guys what the issue is.", ">>{rush42} : It doesn't. Just letting ppl se it from the other perspective.", '>>{Lvl_69_Meme_Master} : >When will Bernie go away? About the same time that Donny releases his tax returns...so never.', '>>{thedange75} : FBI is Trumpland.... Now that I have lost complete respect for the FBI, I shall refer to them as the Gestapo.', ">>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : Donald Trump told me not to believe anonymous sources, and we're going to need at least a 14 more investigations to determine if there was any wrongdoing.", '>>{1461DaysInHell} : So we are back to pretending trump as fairly elected.', '>>{Johnny_Guano} : Yes. Learning basic English is benefiting to discussion. You gave me a memegasm.', ">>{987f} : Do you think it's impossible to vote as a non-citizen?", '>>{Bornsalty} : Serious question: why is contacting ambassadors a bad thing?', '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Did you not notice how the media dropped the russia shit a week ago? It was never real. What ever drives outrage at trump best among democrats is what they run with.', ">>{CynicalYetOptimistic} : Welcome to /r/politics, where anything is true as long as it's bashing Trump!", ">>{radicalelation} : You got two other, less Trump favoring, agencies likely monitoring such things as well. As much as I hate to say it, this seems legitimate unless another agency contradicts it. If they don't, it's probably clear.", ">>{1461DaysInHell} : That's because Trump is a cluster fuck and there is so much noise. It has not been resolved. You may want to move on, but Russia did influence the election, and Members of the FBI took it upon themselves to further help trump.", ">>{Hadramal} : Of particular note was a Dec. 29 telephone conversation, initiated in an exchange of text messages the day before. Trump officials previously had said the call took place on the 28th. This administration really can't stop lying about every detail, big or small.", ">>{ssldvr} : Because at the time, he didn't represent the US so that fact that he is calling him multiple times the same day sanctions against Russia are announced is strange. Putin is someone we have tenuous relations with right now because of his aggression in the Crimea and Ukraine and his support for Assad in Syria. Putin is having his opponents and journalists killed for speaking out against him. This is someone we need to be very careful with. For someone working with a Russian ambassador so closely and frequently while on a presidential candidate's campaign suggests compromise by a foreign government in our election process. Just another example of Trump's many sketchy ties to Russia. Note: he's not contacting ambassador**s**, just the Russian one.", ">>{fco83} : Many started saying 'happy holidays', not just because its more open to those of all religions (which is still a thing to be aware of), but because there's often more than one holiday you're speaking of. Such as both christmas and new years day ('we wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year' is much longer than 'happy holidays''). Not to mention the phrase itself could encompass the whole holiday season and include thanksgiving, and thats before you get into things christians dont celebrate but others might. However, what happened was someone created this narrative that the reason they were saying it was because they were 'against christmas'. From then on, people who heard that took more notice of a fairly innocuous phrase, and suddenly it was this big deal.", '>>{olddivorcecase} : Yes. Can you explain how a non-citizen registers to vote?', '>>{pro_skub_neutrality} : >Where do these people live that justifies this "war on xmas" narrative they push? In Real America^^^TM , of course.', '>>{ipoop4xaday} : I\'m completely baffled at how people just don\'t get it. There are hard rules in place regarding this type of behavior yet all the centipedes just say "meh, so what #MAGA"......it is infuriating that our values, policies and constitution are all so happily ignored.', '>>{ipoop4xaday} : Gish Gallop in heavy doses....this is what benefits Trump.', ">>{chunder_everywhere} : I'm shocked this hasn't made it to the front page of the sub for politics in 2 hours. What's up with this place?", ">>{987f} : You don't have to *prove* citizenship to register. You can lie about your citizenship status. See here: http://registertovote.ca.gov/", ">>{jsdow640} : You forgot to add the part where he donated all of his remaining campaign money to said career politician. Except that didn't happen. It seems clear you'd rather take a man that lies out of his teeth and is a danger to his country than a man who tells the truth and stands by his word of supporting whoever the nominee of the party was (putting whether she gained it fully legitimately or not aside)", ">>{PostTruthPete} : I've said merry Christmas to everyone in the past but I'm going to start happy holidays-ing from now on", ">>{PostTruthPete} : I've said merry Christmas to everyone in the past but I'm going to start happy holidays-ing from now on", '>>{olddivorcecase} : You have to expand your horizons past Breitbart and Fox News! > licenses granted to undocumented immigrants under a new program in the state are "specially marked licenses, which do not entitle them to vote or board airplanes." The article notes that the law was implemented "to provide licenses to immigrants so they could legally drive to work and school and to improve traffic safety by requiring them to pass the driver\'s license test and get insurance." [Los Angeles Times, 7/20/15] You don\'t check a box saying you\'re an immigrant or not... you provide a birth certificate. If you don\'t have that, they offer a *different type of license.* You\'re also not registered to vote. Many states have a very similar program, and it works well to insure we have licensed, insured drivers.', '>>{kiddestructo} : Of course they didn\'t. "Oh and Comey, you can stay!" And the dogshit gets deeper.', '>>{olddivorcecase} : You can\'t get a "regular" drivers license unless you provide a birth certificate. The licenses provided to immigrants are different, look different, and can not be used to register to vote.', '>>{Fuck_Halo_Wars_2} : Yep. Just like most of what Trump says.', ">>{steelnuts} : Why is this buried? Doesn't fit someone's narrative?", ">>{FreshHotTakes} : > Oh so were back to not believing the intelligence agencies again? You're talking to a person. Not a representative of the sub. That being said, nothing is going to be good enough. It is our job to bullshit this president and bitch and moan about everything. It is also our job to lie about him and twist every little fact in the worst way. Because fuck him.", '>>{ipoop4xaday} : little thing called the Logan Act. "Forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government\'s position." Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act', '>>{ipoop4xaday} : So you laugh at potential collusion between the Trump administration and Russia. "Hey Viktor, I know Obama just put sanctions against you but don\'t worry, once our orange emperor takes office, we\'ll see that those go away for ya!" THIS is funny to you??', ">>{Johnny_Guano} : If only it were so. I'd say, unfortunately, Trump defines the American spirit, that's why he won. Just as man makes Gods in his own image, so do Mericans elect public servants by pretending the TV is a mirror. I am sure future Secretary of State Kim Kardashian would agree with me.", '>>{Sootraggins} : The Vatican will make anyone a saint these days.', ">>{Ximitar} : So? Trump is wrong, Sanders is right. That's about all there is to it in this discussion, it's not about who won what.", ">>{ipoop4xaday} : please explain how my misgivings on how this administration, their ties with Russia and their outright, boldface lies are 'off the deep end'.", '>>{ipoop4xaday} : FBI Finds Nothing Criminal In Clinton\'s Emails "Lock her up!" - every Trump supporter. = off the deep end ;)', '>>{SilvarusLupus} : Time to say Happy Holidays to piss people off again.', '>>{RugsMAGA} : but r/pol told me it was a violation of the Logan act and impeachment was imminent', '>>{Ximitar} : Bernie was in government? Was he also born in Kenya?', '>>{Johnny_Guano} : Not really. My point is that guys Sanders could be a bit more "flexible" with the truth and play the game a little tougher, if he wants to persuade and win over the unwashed masses. That\'s how the game works. I\'m not saying I like the game or the rules or even that I don\'t appreciate honesty from a politician ... but you can\'t deny what gets the votes in this Godforsaken land.', ">>{mommy2libras} : But Hillary gave a speech to Goldman Sachs when she was a private citizen so she's the fucking devil.", ">>{keyatz} : So I've been binge watching Hallmark for their Christmas movies (feel free to judge) and somehow The 700 Club came on and you would have thought the sky was falling the way they were 'reporting' on the war on Christmas. Those people are crazy imo.", ">>{ipoop4xaday} : See? We can still have fun spirited discussions. I honestly don't understand where all this hate for the 'other side' comes from. People have different views. Some are abhorrent and revolting while others are just different points of view. Finding common ground, however, has become increasingly difficult as of late because people can't hear the other side over the constant yelling. I can honestly say that I'm rooting for Trump from a policy perspective but I have very little hope especially as of late. However, no matter what he does in office, I will never support the man himself. He is just revolting to me.", '>>{SOY_REINDEER_GRANDE} : 1. You can say "merry Christmas," nobody minds 2. But there\'s nothing wrong with acknowledging the objective existence of other winter holidays by saying "happy holidays" 3. This shit is so dumb', '>>{desertdungarees} : Tell your mom I said "Merry XXXmas." She\'ll know.', ">>{mommy2libras} : Except they haven't. There have still been plenty of articles about Russia. Only now they are interspersed with article about Trump and his lackeys lying to your face about dumb shit.", ">>{olddivorcecase} : The [California DMV](http://www.dmv.org/ca-california/apply-license.php) says you need a certified birth certificate or passport. Where do you live? I'd be happy to look up the law for that state for you, so you have the correct information, and don't make any further ignorant and misleading statements.", '>>{Isdaman} : Translation: Voter fraud only happens in states where Trump won', ">>{olddivorcecase} : Seriously, dude. Just because you don't need to bring your ID to the polling place doesn't mean that you don't need to prove citizenship in order to register to vote. You're either learning disabled, brainwashed by Fox News, or purposefully obtuse. Good luck in life; you're gonna need it. *Holy shit... did you seriously just say this in regards to Florida and climate change? > If it goes back under water it's not our fault, it's supposed to be that way and just for right now happens not to be. You're a lost cause.", '>>{letushaveadiscussion} : But the Clinton News Network hired this guy because they were in bed with Hillary, right??', '>>{noxylophone} : Meanwhile, in Fake America, [the war on ~~Christmas~~ capitalism](http://i.imgur.com/47bvEjth.jpg) is going *fabulously*.', ">>{xpNc} : I have no idea what you're trying to say here", ">>{987f} : You don't need a license to register or vote in California.", ">>{olddivorcecase} : You are correct. You have to prove citizenship in order to register. If you'd like, you can use your license to prove citizenship. Or your birth certificate. Or your passport. Cheezus Christ, go to the fucking CA voter registration website! Don't rely on Fox News or Breitbart or Drudge!!!! The factual information is available right on the device you are using to read reddit on!", ">>{987f} : No you don't. Look at the website: http://registertovote.ca.gov/ You just have to swear that you're a citizen under penalty of perjury. Anyone can lie about that. You don't even need an address!", '>>{olddivorcecase} : WTF. I copied this directly from the website you provided: What You Will Need To register online you will need * Your California driver license or California identification card number, * The last four digits of your social security number and * Your date of birth.', '>>{Northcarlston} : No, trump said during the campaign that it was all a rigged system.', '>>{THWG247} : To be fair Flynn would have to be a special kind of stupid to openly talk about anything incriminating over an open line. Most likely they were using interspersed code words', ">>{glidingclyde} : Says the guy who pushed the rigged narrative in the Primary. Suddenly it's crazy when Trump does it.", ">>{CaptainNeeMoNoy} : When an intelligence agency says they have proof that Trump colluded with Russia, believe them unquestioningly. When they say they uncovered nothing illicit, don't believe them at all. Believe whatever is most convenient for the narrative.", '>>{CaptainNeeMoNoy} : Especially for advocating outright violence against Trump supporters on various occasions.', '>>{drtoszi} : Remember when the FBI was the amazing Hero to the Left when Hillary was "cleared of all charges?"', '>>{Byzantine279} : Nah. A few people figured out it was faster to say "happy holidays" than "have a merry christmas and happy new year." It caught on.', '>>{dermotBlancmonge} : who does this guy work for nowadays? (he quit CNN after the election) joyous pagan festival to you', '>>{_Bubba_Ho-Tep_} : Trump supporters think the FBI was garbage when they let Clinton off and likely celebrate their findings with this news. No shortage of hypocrisy.', '>>{2pacdid911} : Its a stretch to call the PEOTUS an unauthorized citizen. When was the last time someone was charged under the Logan act?', ">>{_Bubba_Ho-Tep_} : It isn't garbage because you don't like how it turned out. They even reopened it on bunk and massively effected the election and it again turned out to be nothing.", '>>{987f} : Keep reading: If you do not have a California driver license or California identification card, you can still use this form to apply to register to vote by completing the online interview by 11:59:59 p.m. Pacific Time on the 15th calendar day before an election.', ">>{ramonycajones} : Uh, Congress is still investigating the Russian ties. This is a slow-moving process, but it's ongoing.", ">>{yobsmezn} : I'd judge you except nostalgia is all we have left. [puts on Bing Crosby Xmas album, weeps]", '>>{nazz4232} : Seriously?? Here we go again. Trumps claims are nonsense. Yet Jill stein does the same thing and this sub praises her', '>>{_Bubba_Ho-Tep_} : It was poorly handled in that they fucked with the election despite not having any evidence.', '>>{just_jesse} : You really think 2,000,000 people used that option to register? Give me a break', '>>{NotWearingCrocs} : I wish I lived in one of the parallel universes where Bernie won the primary and presidency.', '>>{odonnellryanc} : So this guy literally goes around spreading misinformation for the lulz. Lol.', ">>{ipoop4xaday} : He wasn't president and Flynn was operating in no official capacity.", ">>{yobsmezn} : What I've learned in recent years is that average intelligence is way, way lower than I imagined. Makes me ashamed I haven't done more with my intelligence -- apparently I'm a friggin genius compared to 'average'.", ">>{2pacdid911} : I mean the FBI says it was all above board so unless you know something they don't I don't expect any hatch act violations to be coming.", '>>{jgregor92} : Clinton supporters think the FBI is garbage here but celebrated their findings when they found Clinton innocent of criminally mishandling classified information. Also no shortage of hypocrisy.', '>>{yobsmezn} : In California it\'s legally required to say "Hail Satan and Allah" between Nov. 28 and January 30. Any mention of Christmas results in a public flogging. People in the Bible Belt are *so lucky* they\'re not oppressed like us coastal elites.', '>>{Proud2BeCatholic} : Thank God, this war on christmas liberals were fighting has gotten ridiculous. At least we can feel comfortable saying this while Trump is leading our great nation.', ">>{MintJulepTestosteron} : The last time I said Merry Christmas I was attacked by a pack of wild Jews and they gave me 1,000 papercuts with copies of the Torah. No I wasn't because I've always been able to say it. Fuck off Lewandowski.", '>>{AkoTehPanda} : >but Russia did influence the election No shit. Suleiman Kerimov (Russian Oligarch and Politician) and his band of buddies are heavily invested in the banks that funded Hillary.', ">>{AkoTehPanda} : >So you laugh at potential collusion between the Trump administration and Russia I don't. Not OP though. The last line of investigation I dug into ended up lead me from Trump being at the same airport of Dmitry Rybolovlev to Suleiman Kerimov heavily investing in the same banks that fund Hillary and denounce Trump. I've only got limited time though. So if you've got some more interesting lines of research you think might be better for finding dirt on Trump I'd love to see them. If Trump is colluding with Russia I'd like to know, it'd be a lot easier if the money trails didn't keep turning up on Hillary's doorstep though.", '>>{CinematicUniversity} : How great is your life when it is of great concern to you what December greeting is being used?', '>>{rudemonk} : the only one that will be saying Marry Christmas "under" Trump will be his daughter', ">>{S3PANG} : You never couldn't say it, you petulant piece of religious shit. GFY", '>>{Rannasha} : The invasion of Starbucks was a mistake though. The authorities lied to the public about their weapons of mass consumption.', ">>{Rupperrt} : Happy Holidays! That's the good thing about culture revolutions. They never work. People say what they deem to be fashionable.", ">>{ryan_meets_wall} : If people are really bothered by this I feel sorry for you. Merry Christmas never stopped being a thing. Christmas music plays everywhere for two months. Radio stations play it on stop. People dress up in santa outfits and there's Christmas trees everywhere and Christmas movies and everything. When you check out what do many cashiers say?? Merry Christmas. It never went away. It's just we say both out of respect for our country's diversity, which is a good thing.", '>>{LebirtandJuztiz} : Can you say, "Silent Twitter Night?"', '>>{berrieh} : I don\'t know because I have met people who claimed this "war on Christmas" exists where I live, and I hear "Merry Christmas" all the time. I did get cursed out one time while working retail in college because I said "Happy Holidays!" and the person was offended I *didn\'t* say "Merry Christmas." So that was fun. But mostly, I think this is a non-issue IRL either way.', '>>{ImmediateAftermath} : You can have my victim complex when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.', ">>{Da_Bass_Player} : I am a Christian but I have no problem with Happy Holidays and here's why you shouldn't either - Not everyone celebrates Christmas. It's that simple. If you don't celebrate Hannakuh how would you feel if someone walked up to you and said Happy Hannakuh? Now, hopefully you wouldn't be upset - people who get upset by Merry Christmas are scrooge - but it wouldn't make sense either. Therefore, I will wish you merry Christmas if I know you celebrate Christmas, happy Hannakuh if you celebrate Hannakuh, and happy holidays if I don't know what you celebrate.", ">>{abchiptop} : My birthday is between both holidays, so I personally get offended when people don't say happy holidays. I don't, but people getting offended over petty stupid shit like this annoys me to no end", ">>{ThePodThatWasPromisd} : You could say it before so long as you weren't a giant pussy.", '>>{Silent_Hysteria} : Going to be the outcast here...and I\'ll preface it by saying I am not religious at all. There was a huge push a while back to get stores etc from saying merry Christmas....there were people who said it was offensive to have Christmas trees etc. But like almost everything it was only the vocal few who really got butt hurt over it. So now we have people ..the vocal few...who are assholes when people say something "offensive". Happy holidays OR merry Christmas is NOT a passive aggressive F$&& you. Look at context people! I have an atheist friend who does get offended when someone says merry Christmas....he also gets offended when there are crosses at memorials on the side of the interstate because "separation of church and state" BS. Yes yes I know he is a huge douche about it. But he is still a friend and it\'s one of the quirks about him you just ignore for the most part. I have my own I\'m sure he ignores', ">>{I_was_serious} : Under Trump? Like while he's on top of us grabbing our pussies? Yay!!", '>>{Gsteel11} : Thats just it...they dont know anyone who does either, but fox news tells them its out there... The big bad dirk scary liberal cities...ooohhhh...', '>>{Gsteel11} : And those are the same people that complain and cry about people who have real problems are "just pretendning to be victims...like poor people on food stamps who cant afford to feed their kids. Man, "Christianity" these days is anything but...', '>>{charlsey2309} : Yeah and the N word again, no more of this pc african-American lingo.', '>>{charlsey2309} : You should watch something besides Fox News for your information.', ">>{YouCantVoteEnough} : I'm thinking they are the same people that are regularly accused of being racists by liberals.", '>>{rhythmjones} : Yes, and this was 97 years ago. Then Obama became President and it was \'WAR ON CHRISTMAS!!!!!!"', ">>{Solario_ff14} : If I can't control your every behavior, that's oppression.", '>>{trygold} : Hay everybody it is ok again to say happy birthday to people again. Hay everybody it is ok to say have a nice day to people again. Hay everybody it is ok to smile at people again. All hail Trump he has made it ok to say things we have been saying for hundreds of years and that were never not ok to begin with.', '>>{aaronxxx} : Sort of like how Dwight wants to wish people he sees every day "Good Month", instead of saying good morning and good afternoon all the time.', ">>{hillarysidiot} : So let me get this straight. I can trigger these special snowflakes just by saying 'Happy Holidays' instead of 'Merry Christmas'? Is it really that simple?", ">>{mattsoca} : It's in their own minds. Everyone is out to get them: scientists, teachers, media, illegals, etc. And they are all coming to take their guns and steal their jobs. The biggest war in Christmas is capitalism. The holiday to celebrate Jesus' birth has been turned into a damn near 3 month orgy of selling crap.", ">>{466167676f744661726d} : The rules specifically say to not call other people morons, but of course you don't understand. I¿S TU ES NO HABLA STUPIDO¿?", ">>{CaulkusAurelis} : Huh.... that's NOTHING... Here in NYC, we are ALL required to carry a Menorah for the entire month of December, memorize the Koran, AND know all the pillars of Kwanzaa.", '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : Merry Christmas, you dumb fuck! I think that it could catch on....']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{European_Sanderista} : Sanders: Trump voter fraud claims 'disgraceful and unfounded nonsense'", ">>{ShyGuy322} : When will Bernie go away? That's the million dollar question.", ">>{ShyGuy322} : Well, old man Sanders is like 95. He won't live forever. As far as his political career goes, there are only so many moronic liberal arts students that he can bamboozle with his false promises of free education and healthcare.", '>>{Johnny_Guano} : Yea but the people voted that shtick into the highest office. You expect Trump to suddenly stop what got him to the top? Sanders needs to learn and emulate. Voters aren\'t interested in truth and practical ideas. We are a nation Blanche Duboises ... we don\'t want realism. We want magic. And Trump replied "Yes, yes, magic. I try to give that to people. I do misrepresent things. I don\'t tell truths. I tell what ought to be truth."', ">>{wtfwasdat} : > He won't live forever. Legends never die.", ">>{wytxcook} : Bernie's got roughly 50 days of relevancy left. Then he goes back to being one of two (I)'s in the Senate controlled by Republicans.", ">>{RON-PAUL-IN-MY-ANUS} : Taking millions of dollars from college students after your loss became all but guaranteed and then endorsing a career politician after selling a political revolution.....now that's disgraceful.", ">>{Astalano} : Bernie Sanders' whole movement is also disgraceful and unfounded nonsense, so hey, something in common.", ">>{Johnny_Guano} : His movement? You sound like Trump. Your and his proctologist bill must be through the roof. At least Bernie would've helped you pay for it.", ">>{Johnny_Guano} : Good Jews don't die ... they get resurrected. Even Trump voters know that.", '>>{AlternativeHillbilly} : ITT: Attacks on Bernie with no proof that millions of people voted illegally.', '>>{wpatter6} : Weird how those two things never seem to line up this year', ">>{Astalano} : Yeah, before Bernie's government tanked under its own incompetence and inefficiency.", '>>{Johnny_Guano} : I want magic. Trump gave me magic. A fun circus ride. Who cares if he and his Wall St. buddies do a management buyout of our country and rename it Trumpland and make us his employees in a giant casino?', '>>{Lvl_69_Meme_Master} : What an informative and insightful comment. Thank you for contributing high-quality comments such as this to /r/politics. We are truly benefited as a community from your brilliant mind.', ">>{Lvl_69_Meme_Master} : Alleging that millions of fraudulent votes were cast without offering proof...now that's disgraceful.", '>>{Lvl_69_Meme_Master} : >When will Bernie go away? About the same time that Donny releases his tax returns...so never.', '>>{Johnny_Guano} : Yes. Learning basic English is benefiting to discussion. You gave me a memegasm.', ">>{987f} : Do you think it's impossible to vote as a non-citizen?", '>>{olddivorcecase} : Yes. Can you explain how a non-citizen registers to vote?', ">>{987f} : You don't have to *prove* citizenship to register. You can lie about your citizenship status. See here: http://registertovote.ca.gov/", ">>{jsdow640} : You forgot to add the part where he donated all of his remaining campaign money to said career politician. Except that didn't happen. It seems clear you'd rather take a man that lies out of his teeth and is a danger to his country than a man who tells the truth and stands by his word of supporting whoever the nominee of the party was (putting whether she gained it fully legitimately or not aside)", '>>{olddivorcecase} : You have to expand your horizons past Breitbart and Fox News! > licenses granted to undocumented immigrants under a new program in the state are "specially marked licenses, which do not entitle them to vote or board airplanes." The article notes that the law was implemented "to provide licenses to immigrants so they could legally drive to work and school and to improve traffic safety by requiring them to pass the driver\'s license test and get insurance." [Los Angeles Times, 7/20/15] You don\'t check a box saying you\'re an immigrant or not... you provide a birth certificate. If you don\'t have that, they offer a *different type of license.* You\'re also not registered to vote. Many states have a very similar program, and it works well to insure we have licensed, insured drivers.', '>>{olddivorcecase} : You can\'t get a "regular" drivers license unless you provide a birth certificate. The licenses provided to immigrants are different, look different, and can not be used to register to vote.', '>>{Fuck_Halo_Wars_2} : Yep. Just like most of what Trump says.', ">>{Johnny_Guano} : If only it were so. I'd say, unfortunately, Trump defines the American spirit, that's why he won. Just as man makes Gods in his own image, so do Mericans elect public servants by pretending the TV is a mirror. I am sure future Secretary of State Kim Kardashian would agree with me.", ">>{Ximitar} : So? Trump is wrong, Sanders is right. That's about all there is to it in this discussion, it's not about who won what.", '>>{Ximitar} : Bernie was in government? Was he also born in Kenya?', '>>{Johnny_Guano} : Not really. My point is that guys Sanders could be a bit more "flexible" with the truth and play the game a little tougher, if he wants to persuade and win over the unwashed masses. That\'s how the game works. I\'m not saying I like the game or the rules or even that I don\'t appreciate honesty from a politician ... but you can\'t deny what gets the votes in this Godforsaken land.', ">>{olddivorcecase} : The [California DMV](http://www.dmv.org/ca-california/apply-license.php) says you need a certified birth certificate or passport. Where do you live? I'd be happy to look up the law for that state for you, so you have the correct information, and don't make any further ignorant and misleading statements.", '>>{Isdaman} : Translation: Voter fraud only happens in states where Trump won', ">>{olddivorcecase} : Seriously, dude. Just because you don't need to bring your ID to the polling place doesn't mean that you don't need to prove citizenship in order to register to vote. You're either learning disabled, brainwashed by Fox News, or purposefully obtuse. Good luck in life; you're gonna need it. *Holy shit... did you seriously just say this in regards to Florida and climate change? > If it goes back under water it's not our fault, it's supposed to be that way and just for right now happens not to be. You're a lost cause.", ">>{987f} : You don't need a license to register or vote in California.", ">>{olddivorcecase} : You are correct. You have to prove citizenship in order to register. If you'd like, you can use your license to prove citizenship. Or your birth certificate. Or your passport. Cheezus Christ, go to the fucking CA voter registration website! Don't rely on Fox News or Breitbart or Drudge!!!! The factual information is available right on the device you are using to read reddit on!", ">>{987f} : No you don't. Look at the website: http://registertovote.ca.gov/ You just have to swear that you're a citizen under penalty of perjury. Anyone can lie about that. You don't even need an address!", '>>{olddivorcecase} : WTF. I copied this directly from the website you provided: What You Will Need To register online you will need * Your California driver license or California identification card number, * The last four digits of your social security number and * Your date of birth.', '>>{Northcarlston} : No, trump said during the campaign that it was all a rigged system.', ">>{glidingclyde} : Says the guy who pushed the rigged narrative in the Primary. Suddenly it's crazy when Trump does it.", '>>{987f} : Keep reading: If you do not have a California driver license or California identification card, you can still use this form to apply to register to vote by completing the online interview by 11:59:59 p.m. Pacific Time on the 15th calendar day before an election.', '>>{nazz4232} : Seriously?? Here we go again. Trumps claims are nonsense. Yet Jill stein does the same thing and this sub praises her', '>>{just_jesse} : You really think 2,000,000 people used that option to register? Give me a break', '>>{NotWearingCrocs} : I wish I lived in one of the parallel universes where Bernie won the primary and presidency.', '>>{odonnellryanc} : So this guy literally goes around spreading misinformation for the lulz. Lol.'], [">>{TwoToneTrump} : FBI finds nothing illicit in Michael Flynn's calls with Russian ambassador", '>>{conanthecnidarian} : The same FBI that helped get Donald Trump elected?', '>>{stonedhillbilly} : thanks comey! luv ya buddy -donny edit: 2 hours later, surprise surprise, the next story out today... comey keeps his job', '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Oh so were back to not believing the intelligence agencies again? This subs mood changes depending upon the story. Just wanted to know what the current stance is.', ">>{RobeFlax} : The intelligence agencies don't always agree, don't always have the same ends, and don't always work together.", '>>{MasterFwiffo} : The logs said: Merry Christmas! We "hope" to get you a "present.". Would you like to "go bowling" on "Tuesday"? Checks out.', '>>{Trumpologist} : The stance has always been the same? Anything against Trump goes for these people. Lol they kept citing Romney and Palin to bash Trump.', '>>{miltedmalkball} : It\'s almost like a discussion forum contains people with different viewpoints. Shocking. Kind of wrecks your "the other" scapegoat meme though.', '>>{ssldvr} : Other than the fact that he called the Russian ambassador 5 times in one day and works for the GOP candidate/president?', '>>{thedange75} : FBI is Trumpland.... Now that I have lost complete respect for the FBI, I shall refer to them as the Gestapo.', ">>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : Donald Trump told me not to believe anonymous sources, and we're going to need at least a 14 more investigations to determine if there was any wrongdoing.", '>>{1461DaysInHell} : So we are back to pretending trump as fairly elected.', '>>{Bornsalty} : Serious question: why is contacting ambassadors a bad thing?', '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Did you not notice how the media dropped the russia shit a week ago? It was never real. What ever drives outrage at trump best among democrats is what they run with.', ">>{CynicalYetOptimistic} : Welcome to /r/politics, where anything is true as long as it's bashing Trump!", ">>{radicalelation} : You got two other, less Trump favoring, agencies likely monitoring such things as well. As much as I hate to say it, this seems legitimate unless another agency contradicts it. If they don't, it's probably clear.", ">>{1461DaysInHell} : That's because Trump is a cluster fuck and there is so much noise. It has not been resolved. You may want to move on, but Russia did influence the election, and Members of the FBI took it upon themselves to further help trump.", ">>{Hadramal} : Of particular note was a Dec. 29 telephone conversation, initiated in an exchange of text messages the day before. Trump officials previously had said the call took place on the 28th. This administration really can't stop lying about every detail, big or small.", ">>{ssldvr} : Because at the time, he didn't represent the US so that fact that he is calling him multiple times the same day sanctions against Russia are announced is strange. Putin is someone we have tenuous relations with right now because of his aggression in the Crimea and Ukraine and his support for Assad in Syria. Putin is having his opponents and journalists killed for speaking out against him. This is someone we need to be very careful with. For someone working with a Russian ambassador so closely and frequently while on a presidential candidate's campaign suggests compromise by a foreign government in our election process. Just another example of Trump's many sketchy ties to Russia. Note: he's not contacting ambassador**s**, just the Russian one.", '>>{ipoop4xaday} : I\'m completely baffled at how people just don\'t get it. There are hard rules in place regarding this type of behavior yet all the centipedes just say "meh, so what #MAGA"......it is infuriating that our values, policies and constitution are all so happily ignored.', '>>{ipoop4xaday} : Gish Gallop in heavy doses....this is what benefits Trump.', ">>{chunder_everywhere} : I'm shocked this hasn't made it to the front page of the sub for politics in 2 hours. What's up with this place?", '>>{kiddestructo} : Of course they didn\'t. "Oh and Comey, you can stay!" And the dogshit gets deeper.', ">>{steelnuts} : Why is this buried? Doesn't fit someone's narrative?", ">>{FreshHotTakes} : > Oh so were back to not believing the intelligence agencies again? You're talking to a person. Not a representative of the sub. That being said, nothing is going to be good enough. It is our job to bullshit this president and bitch and moan about everything. It is also our job to lie about him and twist every little fact in the worst way. Because fuck him.", '>>{ipoop4xaday} : little thing called the Logan Act. "Forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government\'s position." Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act', '>>{ipoop4xaday} : So you laugh at potential collusion between the Trump administration and Russia. "Hey Viktor, I know Obama just put sanctions against you but don\'t worry, once our orange emperor takes office, we\'ll see that those go away for ya!" THIS is funny to you??', ">>{ipoop4xaday} : please explain how my misgivings on how this administration, their ties with Russia and their outright, boldface lies are 'off the deep end'.", '>>{ipoop4xaday} : FBI Finds Nothing Criminal In Clinton\'s Emails "Lock her up!" - every Trump supporter. = off the deep end ;)', '>>{RugsMAGA} : but r/pol told me it was a violation of the Logan act and impeachment was imminent', ">>{mommy2libras} : But Hillary gave a speech to Goldman Sachs when she was a private citizen so she's the fucking devil.", ">>{ipoop4xaday} : See? We can still have fun spirited discussions. I honestly don't understand where all this hate for the 'other side' comes from. People have different views. Some are abhorrent and revolting while others are just different points of view. Finding common ground, however, has become increasingly difficult as of late because people can't hear the other side over the constant yelling. I can honestly say that I'm rooting for Trump from a policy perspective but I have very little hope especially as of late. However, no matter what he does in office, I will never support the man himself. He is just revolting to me.", ">>{mommy2libras} : Except they haven't. There have still been plenty of articles about Russia. Only now they are interspersed with article about Trump and his lackeys lying to your face about dumb shit.", ">>{xpNc} : I have no idea what you're trying to say here", '>>{THWG247} : To be fair Flynn would have to be a special kind of stupid to openly talk about anything incriminating over an open line. Most likely they were using interspersed code words', ">>{CaptainNeeMoNoy} : When an intelligence agency says they have proof that Trump colluded with Russia, believe them unquestioningly. When they say they uncovered nothing illicit, don't believe them at all. Believe whatever is most convenient for the narrative.", '>>{CaptainNeeMoNoy} : Especially for advocating outright violence against Trump supporters on various occasions.', '>>{drtoszi} : Remember when the FBI was the amazing Hero to the Left when Hillary was "cleared of all charges?"', '>>{_Bubba_Ho-Tep_} : Trump supporters think the FBI was garbage when they let Clinton off and likely celebrate their findings with this news. No shortage of hypocrisy.', '>>{2pacdid911} : Its a stretch to call the PEOTUS an unauthorized citizen. When was the last time someone was charged under the Logan act?', ">>{_Bubba_Ho-Tep_} : It isn't garbage because you don't like how it turned out. They even reopened it on bunk and massively effected the election and it again turned out to be nothing.", ">>{ramonycajones} : Uh, Congress is still investigating the Russian ties. This is a slow-moving process, but it's ongoing.", '>>{_Bubba_Ho-Tep_} : It was poorly handled in that they fucked with the election despite not having any evidence.', ">>{ipoop4xaday} : He wasn't president and Flynn was operating in no official capacity.", ">>{2pacdid911} : I mean the FBI says it was all above board so unless you know something they don't I don't expect any hatch act violations to be coming.", '>>{jgregor92} : Clinton supporters think the FBI is garbage here but celebrated their findings when they found Clinton innocent of criminally mishandling classified information. Also no shortage of hypocrisy.', '>>{AkoTehPanda} : >but Russia did influence the election No shit. Suleiman Kerimov (Russian Oligarch and Politician) and his band of buddies are heavily invested in the banks that funded Hillary.', ">>{AkoTehPanda} : >So you laugh at potential collusion between the Trump administration and Russia I don't. Not OP though. The last line of investigation I dug into ended up lead me from Trump being at the same airport of Dmitry Rybolovlev to Suleiman Kerimov heavily investing in the same banks that fund Hillary and denounce Trump. I've only got limited time though. So if you've got some more interesting lines of research you think might be better for finding dirt on Trump I'd love to see them. If Trump is colluding with Russia I'd like to know, it'd be a lot easier if the money trails didn't keep turning up on Hillary's doorstep though."], [">>{DrJarns} : Lewandowski: We Can Say 'Merry Christmas' Again Under Trump", '>>{Huck77} : You could always say merry xmas. That whole thing is ridiculous.', '>>{mhwtexplode} : Oh just fuck off, nobody stopped you before. These people think this is almost the second coming, next thing you know he will be preforming miracles.', '>>{lipring69} : > Where do these people live that justifies this "war on xmas" narrative they push? Fox News? Or they just go to the store and get upset when people say happy holidays.', ">>{MakingAmericaGreat4U} : I don't get it. Were we saying something different until now?", ">>{DebussySIMiami} : You gotta give it to them, Trump's people know their base is a bunch of morons, and they reinforce their stupid beliefs daily.", ">>{Qunidaye} : you obviously never lost any loved ones during the war on Christmas. My brother died instantly from a generic starbuck's happy holidays IED cup. never saw it coming", '>>{dr_pepper_35} : If you say it three times with the lights out, Santa will appear and stab you with a candy cane.', ">>{californianion} : Yuuup. This would be music to my mom's ears.", '>>{dr_pepper_35} : Ah, yes. Christians, truly the most oppressed of Americans.', '>>{NotFooledbyFools} : Thank God. 0bummer personally put me in a FEMUR camp for saying "Merry Christmas".', '>>{xakare} : He whines more when he wins than he does when he loses.', '>>{draztico} : Supposely, there was this pc rumor where ypu had to say "happy holidays" so you don\'t offend certain demographics. Not sure if true though', ">>{branamuffin} : I'm glad America's #1 priority is being tackled, the War on Christmas!", ">>{orangesarenotnasty} : They are hardly experts. They are just liars that lie, get caught, half admit they lied, and then proceed to say the same lie again. Propaganda should be able to manipulate people across the IQ spectrum. What the Trump team has done is manipulate the dumbest among us. People of average intelligence aren't, and didn't, fall for this nonsense.", '>>{kwhoo} : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.8886 > [What is this?](https://pastebin.com/64GuVi2F/02641)', '>>{mrslappydick} : RIP to all those we lost in the War on Christmas', ">>{fco83} : Many started saying 'happy holidays', not just because its more open to those of all religions (which is still a thing to be aware of), but because there's often more than one holiday you're speaking of. Such as both christmas and new years day ('we wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year' is much longer than 'happy holidays''). Not to mention the phrase itself could encompass the whole holiday season and include thanksgiving, and thats before you get into things christians dont celebrate but others might. However, what happened was someone created this narrative that the reason they were saying it was because they were 'against christmas'. From then on, people who heard that took more notice of a fairly innocuous phrase, and suddenly it was this big deal.", '>>{pro_skub_neutrality} : >Where do these people live that justifies this "war on xmas" narrative they push? In Real America^^^TM , of course.', ">>{PostTruthPete} : I've said merry Christmas to everyone in the past but I'm going to start happy holidays-ing from now on", ">>{PostTruthPete} : I've said merry Christmas to everyone in the past but I'm going to start happy holidays-ing from now on", '>>{Sootraggins} : The Vatican will make anyone a saint these days.', '>>{SilvarusLupus} : Time to say Happy Holidays to piss people off again.', ">>{keyatz} : So I've been binge watching Hallmark for their Christmas movies (feel free to judge) and somehow The 700 Club came on and you would have thought the sky was falling the way they were 'reporting' on the war on Christmas. Those people are crazy imo.", '>>{SOY_REINDEER_GRANDE} : 1. You can say "merry Christmas," nobody minds 2. But there\'s nothing wrong with acknowledging the objective existence of other winter holidays by saying "happy holidays" 3. This shit is so dumb', '>>{desertdungarees} : Tell your mom I said "Merry XXXmas." She\'ll know.', '>>{letushaveadiscussion} : But the Clinton News Network hired this guy because they were in bed with Hillary, right??', '>>{noxylophone} : Meanwhile, in Fake America, [the war on ~~Christmas~~ capitalism](http://i.imgur.com/47bvEjth.jpg) is going *fabulously*.', '>>{Byzantine279} : Nah. A few people figured out it was faster to say "happy holidays" than "have a merry christmas and happy new year." It caught on.', '>>{dermotBlancmonge} : who does this guy work for nowadays? (he quit CNN after the election) joyous pagan festival to you', ">>{yobsmezn} : I'd judge you except nostalgia is all we have left. [puts on Bing Crosby Xmas album, weeps]", ">>{yobsmezn} : What I've learned in recent years is that average intelligence is way, way lower than I imagined. Makes me ashamed I haven't done more with my intelligence -- apparently I'm a friggin genius compared to 'average'.", '>>{yobsmezn} : In California it\'s legally required to say "Hail Satan and Allah" between Nov. 28 and January 30. Any mention of Christmas results in a public flogging. People in the Bible Belt are *so lucky* they\'re not oppressed like us coastal elites.', '>>{Proud2BeCatholic} : Thank God, this war on christmas liberals were fighting has gotten ridiculous. At least we can feel comfortable saying this while Trump is leading our great nation.', ">>{MintJulepTestosteron} : The last time I said Merry Christmas I was attacked by a pack of wild Jews and they gave me 1,000 papercuts with copies of the Torah. No I wasn't because I've always been able to say it. Fuck off Lewandowski.", '>>{CinematicUniversity} : How great is your life when it is of great concern to you what December greeting is being used?', '>>{rudemonk} : the only one that will be saying Marry Christmas "under" Trump will be his daughter', ">>{S3PANG} : You never couldn't say it, you petulant piece of religious shit. GFY", '>>{Rannasha} : The invasion of Starbucks was a mistake though. The authorities lied to the public about their weapons of mass consumption.', ">>{Rupperrt} : Happy Holidays! That's the good thing about culture revolutions. They never work. People say what they deem to be fashionable.", ">>{ryan_meets_wall} : If people are really bothered by this I feel sorry for you. Merry Christmas never stopped being a thing. Christmas music plays everywhere for two months. Radio stations play it on stop. People dress up in santa outfits and there's Christmas trees everywhere and Christmas movies and everything. When you check out what do many cashiers say?? Merry Christmas. It never went away. It's just we say both out of respect for our country's diversity, which is a good thing.", '>>{LebirtandJuztiz} : Can you say, "Silent Twitter Night?"', '>>{berrieh} : I don\'t know because I have met people who claimed this "war on Christmas" exists where I live, and I hear "Merry Christmas" all the time. I did get cursed out one time while working retail in college because I said "Happy Holidays!" and the person was offended I *didn\'t* say "Merry Christmas." So that was fun. But mostly, I think this is a non-issue IRL either way.', '>>{ImmediateAftermath} : You can have my victim complex when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.', ">>{Da_Bass_Player} : I am a Christian but I have no problem with Happy Holidays and here's why you shouldn't either - Not everyone celebrates Christmas. It's that simple. If you don't celebrate Hannakuh how would you feel if someone walked up to you and said Happy Hannakuh? Now, hopefully you wouldn't be upset - people who get upset by Merry Christmas are scrooge - but it wouldn't make sense either. Therefore, I will wish you merry Christmas if I know you celebrate Christmas, happy Hannakuh if you celebrate Hannakuh, and happy holidays if I don't know what you celebrate.", ">>{abchiptop} : My birthday is between both holidays, so I personally get offended when people don't say happy holidays. I don't, but people getting offended over petty stupid shit like this annoys me to no end", ">>{ThePodThatWasPromisd} : You could say it before so long as you weren't a giant pussy.", '>>{Silent_Hysteria} : Going to be the outcast here...and I\'ll preface it by saying I am not religious at all. There was a huge push a while back to get stores etc from saying merry Christmas....there were people who said it was offensive to have Christmas trees etc. But like almost everything it was only the vocal few who really got butt hurt over it. So now we have people ..the vocal few...who are assholes when people say something "offensive". Happy holidays OR merry Christmas is NOT a passive aggressive F$&& you. Look at context people! I have an atheist friend who does get offended when someone says merry Christmas....he also gets offended when there are crosses at memorials on the side of the interstate because "separation of church and state" BS. Yes yes I know he is a huge douche about it. But he is still a friend and it\'s one of the quirks about him you just ignore for the most part. I have my own I\'m sure he ignores', ">>{I_was_serious} : Under Trump? Like while he's on top of us grabbing our pussies? Yay!!", '>>{Gsteel11} : Thats just it...they dont know anyone who does either, but fox news tells them its out there... The big bad dirk scary liberal cities...ooohhhh...', '>>{Gsteel11} : And those are the same people that complain and cry about people who have real problems are "just pretendning to be victims...like poor people on food stamps who cant afford to feed their kids. Man, "Christianity" these days is anything but...', '>>{charlsey2309} : Yeah and the N word again, no more of this pc african-American lingo.', '>>{charlsey2309} : You should watch something besides Fox News for your information.', ">>{YouCantVoteEnough} : I'm thinking they are the same people that are regularly accused of being racists by liberals.", '>>{rhythmjones} : Yes, and this was 97 years ago. Then Obama became President and it was \'WAR ON CHRISTMAS!!!!!!"', ">>{Solario_ff14} : If I can't control your every behavior, that's oppression.", '>>{trygold} : Hay everybody it is ok again to say happy birthday to people again. Hay everybody it is ok to say have a nice day to people again. Hay everybody it is ok to smile at people again. All hail Trump he has made it ok to say things we have been saying for hundreds of years and that were never not ok to begin with.', '>>{aaronxxx} : Sort of like how Dwight wants to wish people he sees every day "Good Month", instead of saying good morning and good afternoon all the time.', ">>{hillarysidiot} : So let me get this straight. I can trigger these special snowflakes just by saying 'Happy Holidays' instead of 'Merry Christmas'? Is it really that simple?", ">>{mattsoca} : It's in their own minds. Everyone is out to get them: scientists, teachers, media, illegals, etc. And they are all coming to take their guns and steal their jobs. The biggest war in Christmas is capitalism. The holiday to celebrate Jesus' birth has been turned into a damn near 3 month orgy of selling crap.", ">>{466167676f744661726d} : The rules specifically say to not call other people morons, but of course you don't understand. I¿S TU ES NO HABLA STUPIDO¿?", ">>{CaulkusAurelis} : Huh.... that's NOTHING... Here in NYC, we are ALL required to carry a Menorah for the entire month of December, memorize the Koran, AND know all the pillars of Kwanzaa.", '>>{CaulkusAurelis} : Merry Christmas, you dumb fuck! I think that it could catch on....'], ['>>{polar8} : Poor battery life even after battery replacement and iOS restore', '>>{shmangit69} : I would have taken it to an Apple Store to get it checked out. But I think you may have voided your warranty by replacing the battery yourself.', '>>{yungfucky} : Shoulda gone to an Apple store for a replacement, too late now.', ">>{Heyyitsmesusan} : What they said ^. It's no wonder battery life is bad when one orders a cheap battery and expects it to be good. You get what you pay for.", '>>{poop__fist} : How much would a battery replacement on a 6+ run me?', ">>{yungfucky} : 79 from apple, covers both battery and installation costs, but they won't touch it if you have 3rd party parts in it.", ">>{poop__fist} : I was expecting to pay more than 79. That's not so bad. I'm sure it takes several days though", '>>{yungfucky} : Well if you go to the Apple store they do it right there', '>>{poop__fist} : So you can get it done in one day?', ">>{Kofile} : Even if you don't have AppleCare, the replacement is $79? I thought it was $329 for some reason"], ['>>{RynheartTheReluctant} : >Facing a deadline to do away with a law that turned North Carolina into a national pariah by denying the right of transgender people to use public restrooms of their choice, state lawmakers rashly settled on a terrible compromise. >On Thursday, they repealed the law in name but not in substance, hoping to assuage organizations and employers that have boycotted the state to protest its discriminatory law. The National Collegiate Athletic Association had given state politicians until Thursday to get rid of the law before it would resume holding championship games in the state.', ">>{rush42} : >The law’s revision would deprive North Carolinians of protection from discrimination for years, and retains the odious notion that transgender people are inherently dangerous. No, no, no! Nobody thinks transgender ppl are dangerous. They are afraid of male sexual predators claiming to be transgender so they can get into women's restrooms and victimize women and children. This is a bill about safety, not discrimination. http://www.dailywire.com/news/5190/5-times-transgender-men-abused-women-and-children-amanda-prestigiacomo", '>>{Quexana} : Finally the truth about the bill is starting to come out.', '>>{floridalegend} : So instead of dealing worth male sexual predators, the right continually demonize transsexuals. Nice try though.', '>>{LittleShrub} : Don’t Be Fooled by North Carolina, There Is No Repeal of The Anti-Trans HB2, Only More Discrimination. https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/dont-be-fooled-north-carolina-there-no-repeal-anti-trans-hb2-only-more', '>>{PolishRobinHood} : Okay. So with this law a male predator just claims to have been born a woman and is just complying with the law. Can\'t verify his claims without checking his birth certificate, which no one cares. So the concern for "safety" makes it easier for what they fear AND demonizes trans people. Such an improvement.', ">>{Inumbrate} : There was a [bit on Trevor Noah](https://youtu.be/-oyLA2X3sd4?t=4m25s) about this too. It's pretty messed up.", ">>{WatashiWaWatashi} : Cut the bullshit. Everyone knows that the rare someone going into a bathroom with the intent to break a law isn't going to be stopped by these bills, and instead they're designed to keep an already marginalized group of people from participating in society without being socially ostracized. If this was really about safety we'd ban GOP congressmen from public bathrooms, what with all the awful scandals they end up perpetrating in them.", ">>{rush42} : Hey I didn't say it made any sense I'm just telling u guys what the issue is.", ">>{rush42} : Um yeah bc I'm a conservative on a liberal subreddit. AND Im NOT saying that I believe this! I'm explaining why ppl supported the law.", ">>{dwntwn_dine_ent_dist} : The issue is that it doesn't make any sense.", ">>{ExpressRabbit} : This law does nothing to stop the problem you're referencing.", '>>{crusoe} : Rapists will rape with or without this bill. It does nothing to protect women.', '>>{ethical_consumer} : Yeah because a rapist is gonna be stopped by a bathroom law. Fucking genius.', ">>{PolishRobinHood} : I don't see how that refutes anything I said.", ">>{rush42} : >Fucking genius. Were u referring to me or the ppl who made this law? Bc I didn't say I believed it. I'm just telling you guys what the issue is.", ">>{rush42} : It doesn't. Just letting ppl se it from the other perspective."]]

classify and reply

[">>{GonzoNation} : Donald Trump is denying any connection between a political contribution benefiting the Florida attorney general and her office's decision to drop an investigation into Trump University.", ">>{hkpp} : Trump team endangered military lives to promote son-in-law's Iraq trip", ">>{the92jays} : She can't back down, she won't back down, but most importantly she shouldn't back down.", '>>{TW1971} : No, I believe he said it was a sarcastic contribution, so we are all good.', '>>{PatriotScum} : You\'re right. We should allow more sites like "girls just wanna have guns".', ">>{cajunrajing} : https://medium.com/@wilw/that-clinton-scandal-the-press-desperately-wants-exists-but-its-actually-about-trump-6d4291edc324#.pjr4mohut Two separate occasions where he made a 'contribution' and criminal issues went away.", ">>{Reddit-Is-Love} : Trump welcomes Son's pledge to invest $50 bn in US", ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Of course he's denying it. To do anything else is to admit to bribery.", ">>{hkpp} : It's the liberal version of ... Drudge? I don't know, it's super biased. Hyperbole aside, I do enjoy it because it's the same type of style that conservatives have fed off of for the past 15 years. I think most people get what this is, though.", ">>{stop-being-poor} : Don't kill em with kindness, just kill em (electorally).", ">>{verbose_gent} : That's the style of propaganda that led to a fascist. You think it's a good idea?", ">>{MaximumEffort433} : >By rushing to tell reporters that Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner was in Iraq, even though he was still en route, the administration broke protocol and created a security breach that endangered U.S. military figures, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Oh for chrissake Donnie, won't you please get your shit together! Yeah, health care is complicated, national security is complicated, taxes are complicated, but not putting your son-in-law's life and the lives of members of our armed services at risk by ***announcing his visit to Iraq to the national media*** is not a complicated thing to do! That's about as complicated as not accidentally shitting in your hat. Jesus Christ, these guys, they're the Team Rocket of American politics.", '>>{LeftousCrusader} : Josh Marshall is a political hack who lost most of his readers over Snowden: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-snowden-prism', ">>{MaximumEffort433} : *Bias* isn't the problem, the Wall Street Journal is biased, the Washington Post is biased, lots of reputable news organizations are biased. The *problem* is when those biases are defended with lies. The reason I dislike outlets like Fox news, Breitbart, and Rush Limbaugh isn't that they're conservative, it's not that they have a right-wing bias, it's that they actively and intentionally deceive their audience in order to defend the party line. I'm liberal as hell and I love The Hill and National Review *because they don't lie to me.* It's fine to have an opinion, it's not fine to make shit up in defense of that opinion. As far as I'm aware, Shareblue, biased as it may be, is not spreading false or misleading information. Until what time as I am shown otherwise, I'll consider them to be both biased *and* reputable.", ">>{aledlewis} : Can't help but feel this was a huge misstep for Clinton. Unnecessary. Perfect ammo for Trump.", ">>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : Can someone give me Trump's phone number? I want to sell him a bridge.", '>>{bearrosaurus} : > Hillary is using the election to spread fear and hatred towards people with different political beliefs. "Lock her up" "Maybe they can deport Hillary" "Shoot her in a firing squad" "Maybe the second amendment people can do something about it, I don\'t know" Sure, the problematic one is Hillary Clinton.', ">>{MaximumEffort433} : It worked for the fascist. As long as we don't run a racist, sexist, authoritarian demagogue I don't see what the problem is.", ">>{verbose_gent} : The RNC didn't run him. He exploded and took over after Fox News, Drudge, Brietbart primed the people. IMHO, I think it's harmless right now unless they're paying people to comment and make posts using the Russian playbook. It's 5 or 10 years down the road that I'm worried about, like i was with fox in the early 2000s.", ">>{hkpp} : Right, which is why I wouldn't go as far as comparing it to Breitbart. Granted, I haven't read Drudge in years but from the times I did look at it regularly, it didn't make a habit of playing to the wingbats.", ">>{TechyDad} : >Jesus Christ, these guys, they're the Team Rocket of American politics. Let's hope they'll be blasting off soon. (A reference I only know because my oldest son watches Pokemon every second he can.)", '>>{Reddit-Is-Love} : Likely impossible to find it on Reddit or any other social media forum.', '>>{Piscator629} : Every time I think the self dealing has reached an unbelievable peak, another deal pops up. This is goddamned outrageous.', ">>{creejay} : This is very suspicious. I'm surprised the media hasn't run with this story. A donation to a politician investigating claims of Trump fraud and then a possible coverup on top of that!?", ">>{verbose_gent} : Drudge just links to other people. It's a different animal altogether.", ">>{shamefuless} : The most destructive force is America at the moment is Trump's mouth.", ">>{shamefuless} : It's OK. If anything bad had happened it would obviously be Obama's fault.", '>>{snarkasonne} : [Its almost like you can click the link and see the sources they used to write the article](http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jared-kushner-iraq-trip-decision-before-arrival-poses-security-risks/)', '>>{cyclopsrex} : But for some reason he was randomly interested in an AG race in another state?', ">>{hkpp} : But it didn't link to that crap, back in the day. I'm kind of dating myself here, but it was a good place to get contrarian opinions at one point. If it went full asshole after Obama was elected then I'll just retract.", ">>{GuitarsAndCameras} : > I'm surprised the media hasn't run with this story. I'm not. They need the election to be close enough to justify their advertising rates. A blowout wouldn't do that.", '>>{BeowulfShaeffer} : I think Tweeting it at him is the best way to reach him.', '>>{sigstone} : The Japanese learn real fast how to get things done in the US in the next 4 years. Say what the orange head likes to hear.', ">>{Vicious43} : It's funny that everything on pol that shows trump in a positive light is down voted to hell.", ">>{Whateverittakes1} : In 2013, SoftBank purchased Sprint, ranked third in the industry at that time, as part of its strategy to merge it with the fourth-ranked T-Mobile US in a bid to create a wireless carrier capable of competing with industry leaders AT&T and Verizon Wireless. *But SoftBank gave up the merger plan after the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's refused to authorize it.* Pay to play!", ">>{Reddit-Is-Love} : You might want to give a try to online earning too, like fiverr, upwork and other freelancing etc. And web developer has a great demand if you have good skills. Don't wait for opportunity, create it. My best wishes are with you.", ">>{RepelGropers} : I'll wait to see where it actually ends up.", '>>{throwawaywriterhack} : In the first paragraph the author stresses the word premise using it repeatedly. A premise is used to base a theory or an argument upon. The writer is saying that in order to sustain the premise, the perceived reality on which her argument is based upon, Hillary must not take back her words.', '>>{ShroudedSciuridae} : He was more interested in the favors he could get with his ~~contribution~~ bribe.', ">>{waste-of-skin} : All just a perfectly normal nothingburger. Nothing at all to see here in the very least. Anybody concerned about this needs a tinfoil hat and a domicile outside of their mom's basement... Ah man, that felt good. *Now* I see why Clinton supporters do it so often.", ">>{LockeNCole} : Shut up, Wesley. Joking aside, it's go to see Hwil Hweaton post real articles.", '>>{throwawatc123} : Trump supporter: "Blacks are lazy thugs by nature. I truly believe that. All Muslims are terrorists. Obama is black and his middle name is Hussein, therefore he\'s a Muslim from Kenya. White lives matter. 14 words." Normal person: "That\'s racist" Trump supporter: "STOP PLAYING THE RACE CARD! GAWD! All I said was that other races are inferior and you stupid libturds immediately accuse me of racism!"', ">>{cajunrajing} : I concur. I mean, i like his commentary on nerd stuff, but it's also pleasant to see that that doesn't preclude his having an opinion on larger matters, too.", '>>{Quinnjester} : But Pam Bondi spoke at the RNC, how does he not have any connections to her?', '>>{GonzoNation} : I believe that is correct. >Donald Trump Says He Can Buy Politicians https://theintercept.com/2015/08/07/donald-trump-buy/', '>>{bearrosaurus} : > what Trump supporters say Dude, it was Trump himself that said most of what I posted.', '>>{Mawo123} : I love the 14 words argument. Is it racist? Sure. However, if I replace white with black, the left no longer sees it a racist but progressive.', ">>{wyldcat} : Well theyre talking about it on CNN right now in a pretty heated discussion between talking heads. The Trump supporters are saying that it's okay because businessmen do it all the time, but that Trump is fighting to stop things like this. WHAT! yeah. It's illegal so there's no excuse.", ">>{Mutt1223} : What a surprise, someone who doesn't support Hillary thinks she made a mistake. What other groundbreaking revelations do you have for us?", ">>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : It's not just Florida. [He did the exact same thing in Texas](https://twitter.com/wemesq/status/772875608984399872).", '>>{StonerMeditation} : To justify slavery, we whites portrayed blacks as subhuman; primitive, stupid, and servile. To justify segregation, we whites portrayed blacks as morally corrupt: ignorant, predatory, and sinful. After civil rights, we whites portrays blacks as evil: drug addicts, gang bangers, and welfare queens. There has never been a point in our history when we whites have systematically and institutionally valued black lives as we do our own.', '>>{FatLadySingin} : > wow you equate what Trump supporters say to Hillary attacking million of Americans... > > > > idiot See below, you got schooled.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : I don't consider Snowden to be a hero, he worked for Booz Allen Hamilton a company with close ties to the Kochs, the day the leaks were announced all four publications that carried the story headlined it with this title: Obama is spying on you. The NSA Domestic spy program was passed by Congress in 2007/08, blessed by teh FISA Court and signede by G.W. Bush in 2008. Washington post had done a deep exposure in 2010 that the MSM ignored. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/", '>>{sweetsweetcentipede} : Must suck to see that your boy has just as many conflicts of interest and shady dealings as the Clintons.', ">>{StonerMeditation} : I'm not black - but when reddit racists post, I wish I wasn't white. I was agreeing with your post with the quotes...", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : >Hillary Clinton has simply said what is the premise of most election coverage of the 2016 campaign: a big chunk of Trump supporters are haters. Racists, misogynists, people who are angry at the social and demographic changes in the country that most Americans see as progress This is a great line of attack. I agree, Hillary can't back down. Keep pushing this. I'm sure many of these people will eventually see that Hillary is right and they really are deplorable, then they'll vote for her as a thanks for her help.", '>>{Joe_Sons_Celly} : But not that sarcastic, to be honest with you.', ">>{creejay} : Really makes no sense. He bribes politicians; therefore, he's going to stop bribery when he's in office. Wouldn't this just mean he's more likely to take bribes as President?", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : WaPo hasn't been a reliable source of information for a very long time. If you want journalism, go to WikiLeaks, The Intercept or Democracy Now.", '>>{Groomper} : We must secure the existence of our people and a future for **white** children. and "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for **black** children." have very different implications.', ">>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : And the next president won't even be a man! Proof that white men are the most oppressed class! Won't someone please thing of the white men for once?", ">>{Agastopia} : Look at all this substance folks; don't we have the best substance", '>>{Groomper} : Hillary Clinton: "Can\'t stop. Won\'t stop."', ">>{SandraLee48} : No wonder Clinton is so guarded, doesn't give press conferences, etc. When she lets loose, her disdain for many, many Americans shines through. :(", '>>{BaloneyFactory} : Trump openly bribes the FL AG but Hillary is crooked.', '>>{Brad_Wesley} : Of course he donated to get favors just as the people involved in the Uranium deal donated to the Clintons did so for favors. The only question is what is worse? Being the buyer or the seller? In the drug was and human trafficking we assume the seller is worse.', '>>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : > If you want journalism, go to WikiLeaks, lololololololol', '>>{helodriver87} : Yep. It\'s not about the phrase itself. It\'s the associated ideology. Saying "lol switch white with black and it\'s not racist" is missing everything beyond a very basic surface level understanding of a sentence. So, trump supporter understanding, in essence.', '>>{GonzoNation} : >The only question is what is worse? Juxtaposition of this specific concern with some vague and not even parallel supposition. Why? Here, old people were hurt by Trump U, and the AG action if continued to be imposed on them, if that action stands would prevent them from recovering significant amounts they were robbed of. At the same time he sells this idea that he could be of benefit, that he could bring jobs, yet even his foreign made hats serve only to "Make America Mad Again" and here, he was a flim-flam. And of great harm to people who supported him.', '>>{MysticRay} : To be fair these were all things said about Hillary, not her supporters.', '>>{Brad_Wesley} : So you think Trump donates to buy favors but Hillary receives donations without selling favors?', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : It\'s all about context. If someone said "We must ensure the existence of our people for Jewish children" in 40\'s Germany it makes perfect sense since they were literally being killed in the millions.', '>>{Naieve} : And the Clinton\'s are ignoring the bill clinton airport meeting with the fbi throwing the case. If you want to play "I know you are but what am i", don\'t leave yourself blatantly open like this.', '>>{Mawo123} : Is missing everything beyond a very basic surface level understanding of a sentence. So, hillary supporter understanding, in essence.', ">>{PatronSaintofPatron} : Not for Brad's benefit, but in case anyone comes across this: Brad's claim is that a bunch of businessmen personally donated millions of dollars to a charity in the hopes that Hillary Clinton would many years later become Secretary of State, and be one of a dozen people in the Federal government to sign off on a deal that benefits their former employers. Beyond improving life expectancy in the developing world though targeted medical aid, nobody has any clear idea what either Clinton or the charity donors got out of this nefarious scheme. Still, they're mad it happened.", ">>{DragonPup} : > doesn't give press conferences Except for the one that she just did?", ">>{Brad_Wesley} : No that's. It my contention. Where did you get the many years later claim from? This happened while Clinton was SOS", ">>{helodriver87} : I'll give trumpets some credit. They have to work much harder to figure out what the hell their candidate is talking about. Unfortunately, it's like trying to translate wing dings into calculus, so it's an exercise in futility. But points for effort are in order I guess.", '>>{dey3y3} : >"Racists, misogynists, people who are angry at the social and demographic changes in the country that most Americans see as progress." there has never ever been close to a majority of u.s. citizens that believed mass immigration and changing the ethnic makeup of this country at it\'s foundational level was progress. every poll has shown the american public are against it. to imagine it otherwise is delusional and remarkably telling regarding the authors own problem with western civilization and white people in a particular.', '>>{bearrosaurus} : I could compile a War-and-Peace-sized book out of the tweets where Donald Trump has personally insulted a Clinton supporter, or any random person that criticized him. Like a certain gold star family.', '>>{Mawo123} : So black people are getting killed by the millions? Did I miss something?', '>>{KrabMittens} : All I want is the news to fairly destroy them both.', '>>{GonzoNation} : > Not Exact Title - Your headline must be comprised only of the exact copied and pasted headline of the article I did the following: 1. I saved the title off in a file called "title.txt." 2. I navigated to the article and copied paragraph 1, line 1 from the article. 3. I ran "Beyond Compare." It reported "binary same." Have the rules changed since yesterday or something?', '>>{GonzoNation} : What a shame. We all had agreed on the rules too. The "exact title" of this article is very badly worded. I think its missing verbs.', ">>{basket_of_adorables} : [She already did.](https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/774671254850772992). Not all of America is reddit, insulting the voters is a terrible idea and whoever wrote that line should be fired. Worse yet it's got legs, Clinton supporters will continue to use it, Trump supporters will continue to wear it as a badge of honor.", ">>{Trumptron3000} : [Oh wait, she's already backed off!](https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/774671254850772992)", '>>{Mawo123} : About 500 years late on that argument. Oh and by the way, who SOLD the africans into slavery? OTHER AFRICANS.', '>>{dxtboxer} : No she didn\'t. Read it again. She only apologized for the "half" comment. She (and other sane people) recognize that there are *a lot* of Trump supporters who rightfully earn the adjective "deplorable." She\'s only insulting that subset of voters, the ones who make up Trump\'s base. She\'s referring to racists, homophobes, xenophobes, anti-Semites, and all manner of general bigots represented by the alt-right; ordinary voters can\'t feel offended at this comment unless they acknowledge that they belong in this group. And we all know that bigots rarely think of themselves as bigoted; the anger from Trump supporters is from the people who can\'t face their own inherently misguided beliefs, the ones who for a brief moment are pulled out of the Trump bubble and shown the real world when Clinton makes comments like these.', '>>{dxtboxer} : Disdain for racists, homophobes, xenophobes, anti-Semites, misogynists, and all the other flavors of bigots out there.', '>>{the92jays} : She backed down on saying half, not on saying a chunk of people who support Trump are deplorable Just like I said she would http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5218un/hillary_clinton_told_an_audience_of_donors_friday/d7gofk7', ">>{torontotemporary} : It's not racist if it's true, amirite? /Trumphead", ">>{Mawo123} : White people. They point is you can't blame solely white people for slavery", '>>{MysticRay} : As bad as that was, those were individual, high profile supporters. You know, I can\'t really think of an instance when Trump went after a mass of voters like that. Not ruling it out of course, but I wonder if you can back your comment up. I searched a few different phrases, subtracting the term "basket" to filter out Hillary\'s quote, and still all I could find was Bill, the Washington Post and everybody else just bashing Trump supporters. Nothing to the opposite really. Specifically nothing where Trump insulted Clinton\'s fans. Again, I\'m not ruling it out but I think Clinton was knowingly sort of upping the ante here.', ">>{makagulfazel} : I regret saying 'half' then continues to beat down on Trump, the people he surrounds himself with and the rhetoric touted by many of his likely voters. But, yeah, totally backed down and this - FINALLY - will be the final nail in her coffin. /rolleyes So thin skinned that you're asking for someone's resignation? How about a safespot, buddy?", ">>{knee-of-justice} : I know right? Why can't us whites just have our America back. /s", '>>{thehonbtw} : She can\'t back down on the general sentiment. But she did need to to clarify the "half and half" rhetoric... What she needs to do is to clarify the rhetoric while doubling down on the general principle that there is a faction who support Trump motivated by actual racist principles.', '>>{Waylander0719} : In all fairness the "half" part is the thing people are taking issue with. No one can argue that "some" are.', '>>{Waylander0719} : She backed off the half but doubled down on the message', '>>{GunOfSod} : You forgot the terrorists. Not true FUD without the terrorists.', '>>{ShyBiDude89} : Look at the replyers username. That person has been here for 4 hours.', '>>{Worldchampionbeard} : Trump attacks Hillary. Hillary attacks Americans. The woman is a disgrace along with being a criminal. Sanders must be kicking himself for letting Hillary cheat him from the nomination.', ">>{Ritz527} : You guys don't understand it. She grabbed the headlines and a news cycle with a controversial statement, apologized on the blanketing, but doubled down on the sentiment. She managed to push the message she wanted to while appearing gracefully apologetic, something Trump doesn't do. Even better, people will see the difference in humility and reflection between the two candidates. She's playing 4D chess, get on her level.", '>>{TheIcelander} : My biggest problem with that line is that there\'s plenty of people who legitimately need help but since "Clinton called all Trump supporters racists" they\'re going to oppose her even more strongly.', '>>{chukklhed} : Hillary is already "expressing regret". I can\'t help but notice that Hillary Clinton spends most of her time regretting her actions. Hillary regrets the sniper fire lie Hillary regrets Iraq vote. Hillary regrets Benghazi Hillary regrets the emails Hillary regrets the private server Hillary regrets "deplorable" comments Is there any real accomplishment that she doesn\'t regret besides destroying Libya?', '>>{SandraLee48} : IMO people are complex so a person who is a racist also has redeeming qualities. Even if this were not true, to write off a large swath of the public as bigots will just make them angrier hence more potential for violence. We have to talk with people who we deem more narrow minded than ourselves.', ">>{jerkITwithRIGHTYnewb} : I've read through your posts here. You aren't very smart. It's not a big deal. By all means keep writing. You are just proving my point.", ">>{Mawo123} : Are you sad I didn't play chess with you?", '>>{escalation} : Better to have someone that thinks first and minimizes the opportunities for regret, then acts without thinking and then tries to talk their way out of it after the fact.', ">>{TupperFlupper} : I'm not voting for any candidate that insults their way to the presidency."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Reddit-Is-Love} : Trump welcomes Son's pledge to invest $50 bn in US", ">>{CMDR-Ad-Victoriam} : Can someone give me Trump's phone number? I want to sell him a bridge.", '>>{Reddit-Is-Love} : Likely impossible to find it on Reddit or any other social media forum.', '>>{Piscator629} : Every time I think the self dealing has reached an unbelievable peak, another deal pops up. This is goddamned outrageous.', '>>{BeowulfShaeffer} : I think Tweeting it at him is the best way to reach him.', '>>{sigstone} : The Japanese learn real fast how to get things done in the US in the next 4 years. Say what the orange head likes to hear.', ">>{Vicious43} : It's funny that everything on pol that shows trump in a positive light is down voted to hell.", ">>{Whateverittakes1} : In 2013, SoftBank purchased Sprint, ranked third in the industry at that time, as part of its strategy to merge it with the fourth-ranked T-Mobile US in a bid to create a wireless carrier capable of competing with industry leaders AT&T and Verizon Wireless. *But SoftBank gave up the merger plan after the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's refused to authorize it.* Pay to play!", ">>{Reddit-Is-Love} : You might want to give a try to online earning too, like fiverr, upwork and other freelancing etc. And web developer has a great demand if you have good skills. Don't wait for opportunity, create it. My best wishes are with you.", ">>{RepelGropers} : I'll wait to see where it actually ends up."], [">>{the92jays} : She can't back down, she won't back down, but most importantly she shouldn't back down.", ">>{stop-being-poor} : Don't kill em with kindness, just kill em (electorally).", '>>{LeftousCrusader} : Josh Marshall is a political hack who lost most of his readers over Snowden: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-snowden-prism', ">>{aledlewis} : Can't help but feel this was a huge misstep for Clinton. Unnecessary. Perfect ammo for Trump.", '>>{bearrosaurus} : > Hillary is using the election to spread fear and hatred towards people with different political beliefs. "Lock her up" "Maybe they can deport Hillary" "Shoot her in a firing squad" "Maybe the second amendment people can do something about it, I don\'t know" Sure, the problematic one is Hillary Clinton.', '>>{throwawaywriterhack} : In the first paragraph the author stresses the word premise using it repeatedly. A premise is used to base a theory or an argument upon. The writer is saying that in order to sustain the premise, the perceived reality on which her argument is based upon, Hillary must not take back her words.', '>>{throwawatc123} : Trump supporter: "Blacks are lazy thugs by nature. I truly believe that. All Muslims are terrorists. Obama is black and his middle name is Hussein, therefore he\'s a Muslim from Kenya. White lives matter. 14 words." Normal person: "That\'s racist" Trump supporter: "STOP PLAYING THE RACE CARD! GAWD! All I said was that other races are inferior and you stupid libturds immediately accuse me of racism!"', '>>{bearrosaurus} : > what Trump supporters say Dude, it was Trump himself that said most of what I posted.', '>>{Mawo123} : I love the 14 words argument. Is it racist? Sure. However, if I replace white with black, the left no longer sees it a racist but progressive.', ">>{Mutt1223} : What a surprise, someone who doesn't support Hillary thinks she made a mistake. What other groundbreaking revelations do you have for us?", '>>{StonerMeditation} : To justify slavery, we whites portrayed blacks as subhuman; primitive, stupid, and servile. To justify segregation, we whites portrayed blacks as morally corrupt: ignorant, predatory, and sinful. After civil rights, we whites portrays blacks as evil: drug addicts, gang bangers, and welfare queens. There has never been a point in our history when we whites have systematically and institutionally valued black lives as we do our own.', '>>{FatLadySingin} : > wow you equate what Trump supporters say to Hillary attacking million of Americans... > > > > idiot See below, you got schooled.', ">>{WhyMnemosyne} : I don't consider Snowden to be a hero, he worked for Booz Allen Hamilton a company with close ties to the Kochs, the day the leaks were announced all four publications that carried the story headlined it with this title: Obama is spying on you. The NSA Domestic spy program was passed by Congress in 2007/08, blessed by teh FISA Court and signede by G.W. Bush in 2008. Washington post had done a deep exposure in 2010 that the MSM ignored. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/", ">>{StonerMeditation} : I'm not black - but when reddit racists post, I wish I wasn't white. I was agreeing with your post with the quotes...", ">>{UvonTheTerrible} : >Hillary Clinton has simply said what is the premise of most election coverage of the 2016 campaign: a big chunk of Trump supporters are haters. Racists, misogynists, people who are angry at the social and demographic changes in the country that most Americans see as progress This is a great line of attack. I agree, Hillary can't back down. Keep pushing this. I'm sure many of these people will eventually see that Hillary is right and they really are deplorable, then they'll vote for her as a thanks for her help.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : WaPo hasn't been a reliable source of information for a very long time. If you want journalism, go to WikiLeaks, The Intercept or Democracy Now.", '>>{Groomper} : We must secure the existence of our people and a future for **white** children. and "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for **black** children." have very different implications.', ">>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : And the next president won't even be a man! Proof that white men are the most oppressed class! Won't someone please thing of the white men for once?", '>>{Groomper} : Hillary Clinton: "Can\'t stop. Won\'t stop."', ">>{SandraLee48} : No wonder Clinton is so guarded, doesn't give press conferences, etc. When she lets loose, her disdain for many, many Americans shines through. :(", '>>{ItsJustAJokeLol} : > If you want journalism, go to WikiLeaks, lololololololol', '>>{helodriver87} : Yep. It\'s not about the phrase itself. It\'s the associated ideology. Saying "lol switch white with black and it\'s not racist" is missing everything beyond a very basic surface level understanding of a sentence. So, trump supporter understanding, in essence.', '>>{MysticRay} : To be fair these were all things said about Hillary, not her supporters.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : It\'s all about context. If someone said "We must ensure the existence of our people for Jewish children" in 40\'s Germany it makes perfect sense since they were literally being killed in the millions.', '>>{Mawo123} : Is missing everything beyond a very basic surface level understanding of a sentence. So, hillary supporter understanding, in essence.', ">>{DragonPup} : > doesn't give press conferences Except for the one that she just did?", ">>{helodriver87} : I'll give trumpets some credit. They have to work much harder to figure out what the hell their candidate is talking about. Unfortunately, it's like trying to translate wing dings into calculus, so it's an exercise in futility. But points for effort are in order I guess.", '>>{dey3y3} : >"Racists, misogynists, people who are angry at the social and demographic changes in the country that most Americans see as progress." there has never ever been close to a majority of u.s. citizens that believed mass immigration and changing the ethnic makeup of this country at it\'s foundational level was progress. every poll has shown the american public are against it. to imagine it otherwise is delusional and remarkably telling regarding the authors own problem with western civilization and white people in a particular.', '>>{bearrosaurus} : I could compile a War-and-Peace-sized book out of the tweets where Donald Trump has personally insulted a Clinton supporter, or any random person that criticized him. Like a certain gold star family.', '>>{Mawo123} : So black people are getting killed by the millions? Did I miss something?', ">>{basket_of_adorables} : [She already did.](https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/774671254850772992). Not all of America is reddit, insulting the voters is a terrible idea and whoever wrote that line should be fired. Worse yet it's got legs, Clinton supporters will continue to use it, Trump supporters will continue to wear it as a badge of honor.", ">>{Trumptron3000} : [Oh wait, she's already backed off!](https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/774671254850772992)", '>>{Mawo123} : About 500 years late on that argument. Oh and by the way, who SOLD the africans into slavery? OTHER AFRICANS.', '>>{dxtboxer} : No she didn\'t. Read it again. She only apologized for the "half" comment. She (and other sane people) recognize that there are *a lot* of Trump supporters who rightfully earn the adjective "deplorable." She\'s only insulting that subset of voters, the ones who make up Trump\'s base. She\'s referring to racists, homophobes, xenophobes, anti-Semites, and all manner of general bigots represented by the alt-right; ordinary voters can\'t feel offended at this comment unless they acknowledge that they belong in this group. And we all know that bigots rarely think of themselves as bigoted; the anger from Trump supporters is from the people who can\'t face their own inherently misguided beliefs, the ones who for a brief moment are pulled out of the Trump bubble and shown the real world when Clinton makes comments like these.', '>>{dxtboxer} : Disdain for racists, homophobes, xenophobes, anti-Semites, misogynists, and all the other flavors of bigots out there.', '>>{the92jays} : She backed down on saying half, not on saying a chunk of people who support Trump are deplorable Just like I said she would http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5218un/hillary_clinton_told_an_audience_of_donors_friday/d7gofk7', ">>{torontotemporary} : It's not racist if it's true, amirite? /Trumphead", ">>{Mawo123} : White people. They point is you can't blame solely white people for slavery", '>>{MysticRay} : As bad as that was, those were individual, high profile supporters. You know, I can\'t really think of an instance when Trump went after a mass of voters like that. Not ruling it out of course, but I wonder if you can back your comment up. I searched a few different phrases, subtracting the term "basket" to filter out Hillary\'s quote, and still all I could find was Bill, the Washington Post and everybody else just bashing Trump supporters. Nothing to the opposite really. Specifically nothing where Trump insulted Clinton\'s fans. Again, I\'m not ruling it out but I think Clinton was knowingly sort of upping the ante here.', ">>{makagulfazel} : I regret saying 'half' then continues to beat down on Trump, the people he surrounds himself with and the rhetoric touted by many of his likely voters. But, yeah, totally backed down and this - FINALLY - will be the final nail in her coffin. /rolleyes So thin skinned that you're asking for someone's resignation? How about a safespot, buddy?", ">>{knee-of-justice} : I know right? Why can't us whites just have our America back. /s", '>>{thehonbtw} : She can\'t back down on the general sentiment. But she did need to to clarify the "half and half" rhetoric... What she needs to do is to clarify the rhetoric while doubling down on the general principle that there is a faction who support Trump motivated by actual racist principles.', '>>{Waylander0719} : In all fairness the "half" part is the thing people are taking issue with. No one can argue that "some" are.', '>>{Waylander0719} : She backed off the half but doubled down on the message', '>>{GunOfSod} : You forgot the terrorists. Not true FUD without the terrorists.', '>>{ShyBiDude89} : Look at the replyers username. That person has been here for 4 hours.', '>>{Worldchampionbeard} : Trump attacks Hillary. Hillary attacks Americans. The woman is a disgrace along with being a criminal. Sanders must be kicking himself for letting Hillary cheat him from the nomination.', ">>{Ritz527} : You guys don't understand it. She grabbed the headlines and a news cycle with a controversial statement, apologized on the blanketing, but doubled down on the sentiment. She managed to push the message she wanted to while appearing gracefully apologetic, something Trump doesn't do. Even better, people will see the difference in humility and reflection between the two candidates. She's playing 4D chess, get on her level.", '>>{TheIcelander} : My biggest problem with that line is that there\'s plenty of people who legitimately need help but since "Clinton called all Trump supporters racists" they\'re going to oppose her even more strongly.', '>>{chukklhed} : Hillary is already "expressing regret". I can\'t help but notice that Hillary Clinton spends most of her time regretting her actions. Hillary regrets the sniper fire lie Hillary regrets Iraq vote. Hillary regrets Benghazi Hillary regrets the emails Hillary regrets the private server Hillary regrets "deplorable" comments Is there any real accomplishment that she doesn\'t regret besides destroying Libya?', '>>{SandraLee48} : IMO people are complex so a person who is a racist also has redeeming qualities. Even if this were not true, to write off a large swath of the public as bigots will just make them angrier hence more potential for violence. We have to talk with people who we deem more narrow minded than ourselves.', ">>{jerkITwithRIGHTYnewb} : I've read through your posts here. You aren't very smart. It's not a big deal. By all means keep writing. You are just proving my point.", ">>{Mawo123} : Are you sad I didn't play chess with you?", '>>{escalation} : Better to have someone that thinks first and minimizes the opportunities for regret, then acts without thinking and then tries to talk their way out of it after the fact.', ">>{TupperFlupper} : I'm not voting for any candidate that insults their way to the presidency."], [">>{hkpp} : Trump team endangered military lives to promote son-in-law's Iraq trip", '>>{PatriotScum} : You\'re right. We should allow more sites like "girls just wanna have guns".', ">>{hkpp} : It's the liberal version of ... Drudge? I don't know, it's super biased. Hyperbole aside, I do enjoy it because it's the same type of style that conservatives have fed off of for the past 15 years. I think most people get what this is, though.", ">>{verbose_gent} : That's the style of propaganda that led to a fascist. You think it's a good idea?", ">>{MaximumEffort433} : >By rushing to tell reporters that Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner was in Iraq, even though he was still en route, the administration broke protocol and created a security breach that endangered U.S. military figures, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Oh for chrissake Donnie, won't you please get your shit together! Yeah, health care is complicated, national security is complicated, taxes are complicated, but not putting your son-in-law's life and the lives of members of our armed services at risk by ***announcing his visit to Iraq to the national media*** is not a complicated thing to do! That's about as complicated as not accidentally shitting in your hat. Jesus Christ, these guys, they're the Team Rocket of American politics.", ">>{MaximumEffort433} : *Bias* isn't the problem, the Wall Street Journal is biased, the Washington Post is biased, lots of reputable news organizations are biased. The *problem* is when those biases are defended with lies. The reason I dislike outlets like Fox news, Breitbart, and Rush Limbaugh isn't that they're conservative, it's not that they have a right-wing bias, it's that they actively and intentionally deceive their audience in order to defend the party line. I'm liberal as hell and I love The Hill and National Review *because they don't lie to me.* It's fine to have an opinion, it's not fine to make shit up in defense of that opinion. As far as I'm aware, Shareblue, biased as it may be, is not spreading false or misleading information. Until what time as I am shown otherwise, I'll consider them to be both biased *and* reputable.", ">>{MaximumEffort433} : It worked for the fascist. As long as we don't run a racist, sexist, authoritarian demagogue I don't see what the problem is.", ">>{verbose_gent} : The RNC didn't run him. He exploded and took over after Fox News, Drudge, Brietbart primed the people. IMHO, I think it's harmless right now unless they're paying people to comment and make posts using the Russian playbook. It's 5 or 10 years down the road that I'm worried about, like i was with fox in the early 2000s.", ">>{hkpp} : Right, which is why I wouldn't go as far as comparing it to Breitbart. Granted, I haven't read Drudge in years but from the times I did look at it regularly, it didn't make a habit of playing to the wingbats.", ">>{TechyDad} : >Jesus Christ, these guys, they're the Team Rocket of American politics. Let's hope they'll be blasting off soon. (A reference I only know because my oldest son watches Pokemon every second he can.)", ">>{verbose_gent} : Drudge just links to other people. It's a different animal altogether.", ">>{shamefuless} : The most destructive force is America at the moment is Trump's mouth.", ">>{shamefuless} : It's OK. If anything bad had happened it would obviously be Obama's fault.", '>>{snarkasonne} : [Its almost like you can click the link and see the sources they used to write the article](http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jared-kushner-iraq-trip-decision-before-arrival-poses-security-risks/)', ">>{hkpp} : But it didn't link to that crap, back in the day. I'm kind of dating myself here, but it was a good place to get contrarian opinions at one point. If it went full asshole after Obama was elected then I'll just retract."], [">>{GonzoNation} : Donald Trump is denying any connection between a political contribution benefiting the Florida attorney general and her office's decision to drop an investigation into Trump University.", '>>{TW1971} : No, I believe he said it was a sarcastic contribution, so we are all good.', ">>{cajunrajing} : https://medium.com/@wilw/that-clinton-scandal-the-press-desperately-wants-exists-but-its-actually-about-trump-6d4291edc324#.pjr4mohut Two separate occasions where he made a 'contribution' and criminal issues went away.", ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : Of course he's denying it. To do anything else is to admit to bribery.", ">>{creejay} : This is very suspicious. I'm surprised the media hasn't run with this story. A donation to a politician investigating claims of Trump fraud and then a possible coverup on top of that!?", '>>{cyclopsrex} : But for some reason he was randomly interested in an AG race in another state?', ">>{GuitarsAndCameras} : > I'm surprised the media hasn't run with this story. I'm not. They need the election to be close enough to justify their advertising rates. A blowout wouldn't do that.", '>>{ShroudedSciuridae} : He was more interested in the favors he could get with his ~~contribution~~ bribe.', ">>{waste-of-skin} : All just a perfectly normal nothingburger. Nothing at all to see here in the very least. Anybody concerned about this needs a tinfoil hat and a domicile outside of their mom's basement... Ah man, that felt good. *Now* I see why Clinton supporters do it so often.", ">>{LockeNCole} : Shut up, Wesley. Joking aside, it's go to see Hwil Hweaton post real articles.", ">>{cajunrajing} : I concur. I mean, i like his commentary on nerd stuff, but it's also pleasant to see that that doesn't preclude his having an opinion on larger matters, too.", '>>{Quinnjester} : But Pam Bondi spoke at the RNC, how does he not have any connections to her?', '>>{GonzoNation} : I believe that is correct. >Donald Trump Says He Can Buy Politicians https://theintercept.com/2015/08/07/donald-trump-buy/', ">>{wyldcat} : Well theyre talking about it on CNN right now in a pretty heated discussion between talking heads. The Trump supporters are saying that it's okay because businessmen do it all the time, but that Trump is fighting to stop things like this. WHAT! yeah. It's illegal so there's no excuse.", ">>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : It's not just Florida. [He did the exact same thing in Texas](https://twitter.com/wemesq/status/772875608984399872).", '>>{sweetsweetcentipede} : Must suck to see that your boy has just as many conflicts of interest and shady dealings as the Clintons.', '>>{Joe_Sons_Celly} : But not that sarcastic, to be honest with you.', ">>{creejay} : Really makes no sense. He bribes politicians; therefore, he's going to stop bribery when he's in office. Wouldn't this just mean he's more likely to take bribes as President?", ">>{Agastopia} : Look at all this substance folks; don't we have the best substance", '>>{BaloneyFactory} : Trump openly bribes the FL AG but Hillary is crooked.', '>>{Brad_Wesley} : Of course he donated to get favors just as the people involved in the Uranium deal donated to the Clintons did so for favors. The only question is what is worse? Being the buyer or the seller? In the drug was and human trafficking we assume the seller is worse.', '>>{GonzoNation} : >The only question is what is worse? Juxtaposition of this specific concern with some vague and not even parallel supposition. Why? Here, old people were hurt by Trump U, and the AG action if continued to be imposed on them, if that action stands would prevent them from recovering significant amounts they were robbed of. At the same time he sells this idea that he could be of benefit, that he could bring jobs, yet even his foreign made hats serve only to "Make America Mad Again" and here, he was a flim-flam. And of great harm to people who supported him.', '>>{Brad_Wesley} : So you think Trump donates to buy favors but Hillary receives donations without selling favors?', '>>{Naieve} : And the Clinton\'s are ignoring the bill clinton airport meeting with the fbi throwing the case. If you want to play "I know you are but what am i", don\'t leave yourself blatantly open like this.', ">>{PatronSaintofPatron} : Not for Brad's benefit, but in case anyone comes across this: Brad's claim is that a bunch of businessmen personally donated millions of dollars to a charity in the hopes that Hillary Clinton would many years later become Secretary of State, and be one of a dozen people in the Federal government to sign off on a deal that benefits their former employers. Beyond improving life expectancy in the developing world though targeted medical aid, nobody has any clear idea what either Clinton or the charity donors got out of this nefarious scheme. Still, they're mad it happened.", ">>{Brad_Wesley} : No that's. It my contention. Where did you get the many years later claim from? This happened while Clinton was SOS", '>>{KrabMittens} : All I want is the news to fairly destroy them both.', '>>{GonzoNation} : > Not Exact Title - Your headline must be comprised only of the exact copied and pasted headline of the article I did the following: 1. I saved the title off in a file called "title.txt." 2. I navigated to the article and copied paragraph 1, line 1 from the article. 3. I ran "Beyond Compare." It reported "binary same." Have the rules changed since yesterday or something?', '>>{GonzoNation} : What a shame. We all had agreed on the rules too. The "exact title" of this article is very badly worded. I think its missing verbs.']]

classify and reply

['>>{l3lack1} : Obamacare Repeal Would Leave 18 Million Uninsured, Send Premiums Soaring: Report', '>>{Johnsmitish} : Eric Trump: Father won’t be ‘pushed around’ by Putin', ">>{Ouroboros000} : No kiddin'. I love the people who are replying to my health insurer related posts arguing how much big insurers LOVE the ACA - which of course is pure BS.", '>>{typical_bro} : This is a report from the Congressional Budget Office. Not polls.', '>>{frackpot} : With 18 million losing coverage, how many health care workers are soon to be unemployed?', ">>{Usawasfun} : Why is Eric talking so much. I like it when the president's kids just kind of don't have much input, especially when they are running his business.", '>>{zherok} : She did. Trump won by a fairly small margin in a handful of states, while losing the popular vote by a rather large margin. A 90% chance of occurring still leaves a 10% chance to not occur. Not that this changes the point of the article, a hypothetical situation: remove healthcare from existing ACA users, and about 18 million people no longer have healthcare.', '>>{hawaiimanila} : How\'s that protest vote working out for you Bernie bros? never forget that politics is compromise and voting for the "lesser evil\' is not as bad as it sounds', '>>{deebaggus} : No pushing necessary...Trump will do as he is told or it is Kompromat Time.', '>>{Rantheur} : They have a love-hate relationship with the ACA. On the one hand, they love that everybody is required by law to have health insurance. On the other hand, they hate that they actually have to pay out for health care. Unfortunately, the insurance giants (and most corporations these days) focus only on the short term and miss the big picture. In the case of health insurance, paying for routine preventative care is cheaper than having to cover a catastrophic illness. A regular checkup costs, on average, about $100 annually. Let\'s also multiply that by the current life expectancy of a US citizen, 78.74 years. The lifetime cost of regular checkups for a human being is only $7874. On average, health insurance costs $286 (monthly) for individuals and $727 (monthly) for a family. In a single year where a customer doesn\'t suffer from a major illness or accident, the insurance company makes $3332 on an individual. For a family of four, if they all remain healthy and all get an annual checkup, they make $8324 annually for the entire family. Now, let\'s look at the "rare" stubborn ass who never goes to the doctor for any reason at all and see what the insurance company makes over the course of his life. $270,235.68 Now keep in mind that insurance companies cover hundreds of people, so they\'re seeing more than that number annually. The ACA was a gift to the insurance companies and if they don\'t love it, it is purely because of their own avarice.', '>>{BerniellBustie} : Amazing. I hope the DNC gets everything coming to them.', '>>{LAmoderate7} : Below is movement of health insurance company stock since ACA was signed into law: Cigna up 316% Anthem up 173% UnitedHealth Group up 349% Aetna up 310% Humana up 248% S&P 500 up 92% Boy I am sure they are super mad!', '>>{malpais} : Please dont throw me in the brier patch Mistuh Putin.', '>>{LAmoderate7} : Paul Ryan finished the draft of the replacement, which he will be releasing next week. He also said they will not repeal without a replacement. The 18 million number, while accurate, is meaningless to share', '>>{Ouroboros000} : Yeah, up because they are betting that the ACA is coming to an end.', '>>{Ouroboros000} : > it is purely because of their own avarice. And avarice is one thing they have a lot of to spare.', '>>{apolitic} : #FireBannon and #FireKushner trend on Twitter amid reports of WH feud', ">>{LAmoderate7} : Right, the bet that has been going on since October 2010. Your theory may be plausible if I presented change in share price since election day, but as it stands, the stock charts don't match your narrative.", '>>{Ouroboros000} : You are just cherry picking and you know it.', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : I wonder how much of the latter is bots afraid of losing bannon', ">>{GrumblePuff} : Sorry Eric, but Putin's cock is so far up your daddy's ass he's licking the tip.", '>>{HankMoody_} : All of the other kids talking this much really gives one an appreciation for Tiffany. Keeping doing you, girl.', ">>{uhuhuhu} : Unlike Obama's daughters, Eric is an adult with his own opinion about the issues.", '>>{wakaswag} : If she had a 90% chance then Trump had a 10% chance which is still a chance... Your criticism is dumb and your life is boring and useless', '>>{LAmoderate7} : Yeah I cherry picked the five largest health insurance companies lol who else would you pick? What are you talking about?? I even included the S&P 500 for reference.', '>>{BUNKBUSTER} : Post Bannon\\kushner gay clown pics please. Vlad needs a distraction.', '>>{conanthecnidarian} : If Ivanka was able to sway him so easily, Putin will have no trouble at all.', ">>{angstybagels} : Tbh if you think Trump would fire Kushner you're completely delusional. We need impeachment stat.", '>>{Mawontalk} : Donald Trump and his son, Eric, remind me of [Sylvester the Cat and his son, Junior](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x_FzCWl2nc).', ">>{IPeedOnTrumpAMA} : Puppets don't get pushed around. They get their stings pulled or the giant hand up their ass makes their mouth move.", '>>{Ouroboros000} : >[Busted! Health Insurers Secretly Spent Huge To Defeat Health Care Reform While Pretending To Support Obamacare](http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/06/25/busted-health-insurers-secretly-spent-huge-to-defeat-health-care-reform-while-pretending-to-support-obamacare/#34dd7a4c16c7) >>According to the National Journal’s Influence Alley, at the very same time the American HealthInsurance Plans (AHIP)—the health insurance industry super lobby—was cutting a deal with the White House leading to its stated support of the proposed Obamacare legislation, **they were secretly funneling huge amounts money to the Chamber of Commerce to be spent on advertising designed to convince the public that the legislation should be defeated**. >>...So, why would AHIP try to secretly destroy a legislative scheme that would drive millions of new customers into their arms thanks to the mandated insurance provisions? (...) it was all about the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)—the provision of the ACA that not only requires the health insurance companies to spend 80 percent of your premium dollars on actual health care expenditures, but further requires that they refund to their customers any amounts they fail to spend as required by the MLR.', ">>{pravenone} : Fuck a firing. Let's get a fight to the death. Thunderdome these sycophants.", ">>{Usawasfun} : Sure. So is every adult, Eric's opinions don't really matter. I'm just saying I thought they were going to try and separate the business and politics, obviously they aren't going to do that.", '>>{Misanthraloperer} : Eric reminds me a bit of Carter Page. He just keeps yapping and yapping and revealing all these uncomfortable truths about President Bigly.', ">>{ColePhelps-} : This will make Trump's blood boil. It pleases me to know he hates that we are gaining ground against him. Soon he and his ilk will be cornered like the rats they are.", ">>{Infidel8} : The #FireKushner trend was mostly bots and trolls. So, I think we know whose side Putin is on. The funny thing to me is that bot traffic is relatively obvious now, given everything we've learned over the last 6 months. But right-wingers seem totally oblivious to it. The #SyriaHoax tag from the other day was a perfect example.", '>>{ent4rent} : Picking sides? More like get them both out.', ">>{TheDon2016} : Why would premiums rise? Right now premiums are rising because the middle class is being forced to subsidize 20 million people receiving free insurance and also being forced to buy coverage for stuff they don't need or want.", '>>{LAmoderate7} : Again, I am sure they are super pissed their equity value has doubled to tripled since the ACA went into effect. I do not understand why you are arguing this? Publicly available market data on the five largest insurance companies. There is not as much subjectivity as you think.', '>>{Ouroboros000} : > I do not understand why you are arguing this? Because the GOP is torpedoing the ACA precisely BECAUSE of these people who you are ridiculously portraying as innocent parties.', ">>{LAmoderate7} : How am I portraying them as innocent parties? I am arguing against your stance that big health insurance companies don't like the ACA. They have seen equity growth WELL above market average since ACA was written into law. Why are you so insistent that these companies hate doubling and tripling in value?", '>>{Motagada} : Is it weird that the only males i associate with saying "father" are british and rich brat kids. and i mean that with absolutely no disrespect to british people', ">>{Ouroboros000} : > How am I portraying them as innocent parties? You are playing 'innocent' right now in pretending not to understand what I'm saying.", '>>{The_Killing_Road} : And what do you think will happen when Putin feels he no longer can "push" your daddy around? One might think he will then have no use for Trump and may "leak" something damaging. Strap in kiddo.', '>>{thenoidednugget} : Where were you when politics became a Twilight fandom?', ">>{Misanthraloperer} : No puppet! No puppet! He's more like a Muppet. A big, orange, mussy haired Muppet.", '>>{newocean} : Whenever two people on my Skype list share a birthday... I send them both this --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Oq6vztcjgg <-- I suppose it could be used here as well...', '>>{Kung_Fu_ActionJesus} : I was entirely on board with the "Trump is just a Bannon puppet" idea not too long ago. Seeing Bannon fumble around recently has been refreshing to say the least, but Trump is still here, so it\'s not all rainbows and sunshine just yet.', '>>{LAmoderate7} : You are literally ignoring concrete evidence health insurance companies did well under ACA, a statement which you said was false in your first post.', '>>{cd411} : The main reason it\'s taking Ryan so long (8 years) to come up with a replacement for Obamacare is [today\'s Affordable Care Act is very similar to the privatized mandate plan the Republicans pushed for 40 years (Romnycare).](http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/ct-this-is-why-republicans-can-t-find-a-replacement-for-obamacare-20170106-story.html) Ryan and the Republicans obviously don\'t want any replacement.....[**They want to eliminate Medicare too.**](https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/11/15/paul-ryans-plan-to-phase-out-medicare-is-just-what-democrats-need/?utm_term=.db2572fc619c) And to think, auditoriums full of cheering suckers with GOP kick me signs taped to their back voted to lose their own healthcare *and* [many rural hospitals](https://www.insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/rural-hospitals-brace-damage-aca-repeal) when they elected "America\'s first East Coast elite" Billionaire president who plans on ruling from his [golden chair in his 3 story, 100 million dollar, 5th avenue, New York city penthouse! with his stripper wife](http://imgur.com/a/E2U5N) and his silverspoon kids who will never want for anything. Do they look worried about healtcare? At this late date the onus is on Ryan to produce a "workable" Plan. Until then all bets are off.', ">>{elfradlschneck} : I don't use Twitter. Could you briefly explain why the bot traffic is obvious?", ">>{MrsChanandalerBong} : https://www.google.com/amp/www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2017/01/08/as-obamacare-repeal-looms-hospitals-brace-for-job-losses/?client=safari Conservative estimates are 2.5 million,but it's Trump so we best not underestimate.", ">>{TitanKS} : I say keep talking. He's just compounding the dumb pile.", '>>{Battaglia} : Bannon is so ugly. Pls just go away bruh', ">>{politicsthrow} : >Right now premiums are rising because the middle class is being forced to subsidize 20 million people receiving free insurance That's not how the subsidies are funded. Subsidies are funded by an additional Medicare tax on those making $200k ($250k for a couple) and up. They aren't funded by premium increases. >buy coverage for stuff they don't need or want. All of those extras...the birth control mandate, the preventive services coverage, keeping kids on parents insurance until 26, maternity coverage, removal of lifetime caps, etc...only increase a premium by less than 5%. Premiums would rise because those who don't think they need insurance would not purchase insurance. You'd be left with only sick people who need insurance in the risk pool. That would absolutely cause premiums to skyrocket in the individual market especially if pre-existing conditions are to remain covered. The only way to get premiums down would be to drop insurance on these people. If you're comfortable with letting people die, then yeah, insurance can come down...a lot.", ">>{Woxat} : I'd assume it's the mans son in law but one guy has a whole entire lunatic fanbase so.", ">>{Woxat} : I'd be panicking too if my source of income was threatened.", ">>{MannToots} : > BECAUSE of these people who you are ridiculously portraying as innocent parties. I'm just hopping in now having read both of you going back and forth up until now. That's not at all what he was saying. He was simply responding to > how much big insurers LOVE the ACA - which of course is pure BS. with actual real world proof many of those exact big insurers have made tons of money on the ACA which is a 100% rebuttle of your claim. You sound desperate since you're moving the goal post so much on /u/LAmoderate7", '>>{pravenone} : I imagine less golden wings, more slap fighting, and heavier breathing. But pretty on point.', '>>{TRUMPSBOMB} : Not Twitter hashtags! Whatever will the both of them do?', ">>{RosneftTrump2020} : There are analytics as to the source of trending tags. But I haven't seen them.", '>>{DontMicrowaveCats} : To be fair there is a lot of sensationalism going on with this. The 18 million figure presents the absolute worst case scenario of a total repeal with no viable replacement and a lot of bad things falling into place. Evil as some of these guys may be, I don\'t see them enacting something that will cause 18 million people to lose coverage without replacement. They still care about votes afterall. The fact is this is all just a play to turn "Obamacare" into "Trump Care". Their new bill will inevitably have the same basic foundation of the ACA. Both sides admit there are a lot of holes in the current system....the ACA is just a bandaid on a broken machine. Im covered myself under it and see a lot of the problems firsthand. So I\'m keeping my fingers crossed they\'re going to fix some of those issues with this. If they have to turn it into "Trump Care" to get it fixed, then I support it personally. I\'m not sad to see Obamacare go and I\'m willing to give the GOP a chance to present a better alternative. We\'ll see soon enough if that will happen.', '>>{angelcake} : Perhaps headlines should read ACA repeal instead of Obamacare repeal. There are apparently still are a lot of people who think they are two separate things.', ">>{Brobacca} : I mean the ACA is like the most republican plan ever.... subsidies for citizens to purchase insurance from private companies in a well-regulated market. I can't believe they will deny reality to win political points with idiots who don't even realize Obamacare and the ACA are literally the same thing.", '>>{JakeLV426} : He may grab him by his hair and move his head up and down faster though', '>>{woowoodoc} : Every day, this administration manages to sink to new levels of embarrassment.', ">>{recruit00} : I'm fine with Eric talking as he always reveals something we didn't know.", '>>{gotsafe} : We care not for American politics and....... java.lang.exception.NullPointerException', ">>{buttpup} : Yeah because we're all being fined if we don't have it.", '>>{travio} : Pence could actually get things done. That could be worse.', ">>{mehkko} : I don't know. Well, at least Pence won't waste money on golfing, keeping his wife in NYC, missile distractions and a useless wall. Don't know if tourism will recover under him though.", '>>{PrometheusSmith} : It probably has something to do with the fact that the [cost of US healthcare](https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/highlights.pdf) is much higher than most people realize. The average person incurs just under $10,000 in healthcare costs per year. If you average it over the number of people that [actually can pay](https://www.reference.com/government-politics/many-adults-live-usa-b830ecdfb6047660) for healthcare, that number goes up by over 30%. Between your tax dollars that fund Medicare, Medicaid, and what you spend on health insurance, every American pays into that pot of money spent on our health.', ">>{politicsthrow} : > Then why did my insurance go from $140/month (dropped plan) to $400/month with a $7,500 deductible $7500 exceeds the maximum legally allowed out of pocket limit, so, that's just not accurate. Also, looking at your post history, that number seems to jump around willy nilly. You don't actually have insurance, do you? Are you just one of the numerous paid Trump supporters? Your premiums went up because people are using their insurance. That's the only reason. Sick people can't be denied coverage. >Also all insurers pulled out my states and the only one left is mainly BCBS They'll all be gone in a bit as soon as the Republicans repeal.", ">>{pegothejerk} : Every time one man leave the dome he gets to make a piece of legislation. And it can't more a wish for more legislation or no more legislation.", ">>{politicsthrow} : >$7500 exceeds the maximum legally allowed out of pocket? https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/out-of-pocket-maximum-limit/ >I'm assuming you are on a subsidized plan (make under $40k/year). Nope. Fully insured by the company I work for. Which is better than being uninsured like yourself. How much is Trump paying you these days?", ">>{politicsthrow} : Typical paid Trump supporter. Can't argue the facts. Get lost, kid.", ">>{politicsthrow} : What exactly does Hillary have to do with Republican policy that will increase your insurance premium or completely eliminate the individual market in your state? That's all on your boss and his party.", ">>{THEREALKGB} : Yes yes we like the Levi's jeans very much We drink whiskey not vodka", ">>{morbidexpression} : seems to be failing at doing anything with healthcare. I'd much prefer a scandal-clogged Pence as lame duck.", '>>{just_a_timetraveller} : Wow our government has devolved into #TeamBannon vs #TeamKushner. Next nominations will setup like The Voice where a rep from each branch of government will get to turn their chairs in approval of a new president', ">>{Film_Director} : There's a copy of the hashtag origin map in this article. https://medium.com/@MJGWrites/for-those-of-you-not-on-twitter-today-it-was-pretty-amazing-to-actually-witness-the-russian-bots-bcb72c5ce982?source=linkShare-c6c39d987d40-1491643856", '>>{its_a_me_garri_oh} : Babe Ruth is my favorite sports tzar, cheer for home run Also like playing with football that is not round, i say to friend: komrade, throw to me pig skin! Happy times.', '>>{not_MI6_not_CIA} : Both. Bots lead, those unfortunate enough to buy into the lies follow', '>>{ButlerianJihadist} : How is that a proof of anything? And what is it supposed to prove - that the hashtag originated in the UK?', '>>{Tempus_Fugitive} : And like the rest of Trumps bombs, you missed your mark.', '>>{notjabba} : In hoping they all make up and then everyone in the White House gets together for a celebratory snapshot with the photographer from King Ralph.', ">>{Daemonic_One} : No. It shows the countries external to the US pushing the tag the heaviest were Russia, India, Iran, UK, Spain, and Chile. Analysis would suggest it to be unlikely that the source of the tag itself would come from the UK or Spain, though UK likely has a developed presence of both botnets and unknowing supporters post-Brexit. Of the others, the most likely leader in any action would be Russia; I'd be inclined to say Iran and India could be just points of large groups of infected systems passing out the information, as well as paid shills to push the tags. I'm kind of curious why Chile is so far up there though. EDIT: Just my take. I'd be interested if anyone could inform the analysis more.", '>>{wellitsbouttime} : I just want anderson cooper to fuck him and release the tape. Everyone knowing just how gay mike pence really is will crush any political will he has. Anderson, please. You have the access. You have the jawline. Do it for your country.', '>>{OliverQ27} : So if Bannon and Priebus get fired, do you think things will improve, or will it cause more issues?', '>>{ButlerianJihadist} : > Analysis would suggest What analysis? Where is it? > UK likely has a developed presence of both botnets and unknowing supporters post-Brexit So why isnt there an even bigger botnet in the US that would start the hashtag? This demented russophobia is making zero sense.', '>>{TheShishkabob} : Everything points to it actually slowing the rate the premiums increased. Did you not pay for insurance before it was implemented?', ">>{mephodross} : 2013 is was about 66$ a month thro work. Now the cheapest I can get is about 200$ a month thro work. I'm just one person but I know I'm not alone on this.", ">>{thewholedamnplanet} : No but he will be bought and sold and he will do as he's told.", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Tiffany hasn't had her surgical upgrade yet, like her half sister.", '>>{Huckleberry_Win} : [My impression of Donald Trump standing up to Putin](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJYInp-W_ww)', '>>{ChumpAdministration} : Eric Trump seems like the biggest fuckin weasel faced pussy boy I\'ve ever seen. Like the kind of guy who would say "MY DAD OWNS HALO AND WILL BAN U" unironically.', '>>{Gonzanic} : Someone should start a "shutupthebothsofyouse" hash tag.', ">>{Macracanthorhynchus} : NoDoz, Ambien, Claritin - that's a recipe for one weird afternoon.", ">>{IK00} : Trump is very much his own man - the problem is he's extraordinarily easy to manipulate (because he's a complete moron and a demented old man to boot). If you get cocky/incompetent and clue him into your manipulation, his ego is bruised and he'll turn on you. Bannon flew too close to the sun and made his machinations obvious even to demented old Trump. The only criminal masterminds we're dealing with are the Russians. Everyone else is a bumbling pawn who happened to control resources useful to the Russians.", ">>{mreniac} : How long have you been buying health insurance for yourself? Even during the mid/late 90s, through the 2000s, it ended up costing you more every damn year. After the ACA, its continued to climb, but in many cases not as steeply, and with more people able to just go to the doctor before an emergency room visit is involved. No pre-existing, on your parents plan until 26 (so you can get through college/apprenticeships). Its a Heritage Foundation plan, this was 'the plan'. Now the GOP is all butt-hurt the Dem got it done. Deliver an answer or fuck off.", '>>{Ouroboros000} : > big insurers have made tons of money on the ACA And they expect to make a lot more without it >on /u/LAmoderate7 I have no idea what that is', ">>{mreniac} : Trying to raise a family of four on 36,000 a year is going to be hard any way you cut it, but you're looking at around 1200/month for insurance. Given a subsidy of about a thousand dollars every month (as calculated by http://kff.org/) you're only going to pay only around 200 bucks a month.", ">>{MannToots} : > And they expect to make a lot more without it That doesn't mean it refutes what he said. It's still 100% a fact they profited greatly on the ACA. The fact they could have made more is irrelevant against that fact since it doesn't prove it wrong. > I have no idea what that is The person you were talking to. :-/", ">>{Ouroboros000} : > It's still 100% a fact they profited greatly on the ACA And they will profit 100% more if its repealed.", ">>{MannToots} : That's irrelevant to the point being made and does not conflict with it at all. Your post serves no point to further this discussion at all. I guess we're done here.", '>>{Nan0machines} : > Eric Trump later added: *wink wink*', ">>{ShakeyBobWillis} : Duh. Who pushes something they have on a leash? That doesn't make any sense. They follow behind like a good little gimp.", '>>{Armin-Tamzarian-} : You can\'t just "fire" the president. Jared Kushner would have to be removed by impeachment.', '>>{0ldgrumpy1} : Depends on who he gets to replace them, most likely another corrupt businessman or another conspiracy nut. Hard as it might be to believe, he could actually do worse.', '>>{HeTalksToComputers} : The ratio of bots to actual users would much lower in the US than say India where I doubt Trump has much grassroots support.', '>>{StayGold1850} : Every day Trump wakes up and is still President, Putin wins by default.', ">>{tbaskerv138} : I hate him. He's actually turned this into a reality show. Are you #teamBannon or #teamKushner? Cast your votes and find out who stays and who goes, Monday at 8!", '>>{FDRs_ghost} : No, Trump is more like a sock puppet that Putin has his arm up to the elbow in the hinder.', '>>{ChrisTosi} : Dude, they just love that their shitposts get thousands of likes and upvotes and retweets and whatever fucking else metric they use to validate their shitty opinions that never fly in real life because they get shunned for being so obviously stupid. They don\'t care to look any deeper than, "There are others out there who think just like me!"', ">>{ChrisTosi} : Ehh...give him another few months and he'll get the hang of it. It turns out all you need to gain popularity in this country is to start lobbing missiles at things. We can blow up Somali Pirates, empty bases in Syria, shit in Yemen, parts of Mosul, etc. Maybe we can strike up a deal with NK to bomb some of their empty silos in exchange for rice. Maybe we'll throw in some Spam if Kim Jong-Un broadcasts a picture of himself defiantly shaking his fist. get the military industrial complex humming again! we need more ammo! make ammo great again! fuck", '>>{ButlerianJihadist} : But this unsourced graph appears to show the origin of the hashtag not the ratio of whatever.', ">>{AWright32} : I'm surprised with how anti-war this sub has been in the past they would be pro-interventionist Kushner. You want a war with Syria? Support Kushner and watch it happen.", '>>{reelznfeelz} : Reminds me of that Black Mirror episode with the mechanical bees.', ">>{ramonycajones} : Pence has no cult of personality, he's just unpopular, so at least he's a one-term problem. And he's not looking to destroy the international order, so, that's a plus.", ">>{A_FVCKING_UNICORN} : I'm legitimately thinking Pence couldn't be worse than Trump at this point. That's how low the bar is.", ">>{HankPeppercorn} : I'd still watch the shit out of that tape though...", '>>{TheManWhoWasNotShort} : Personally, I support the chaos. Fire both!', '>>{Bowman2} : But he would be the patriot thay we needed.', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : > i say to friend: komrade, throw to me pig skin! Happy times. And then I had flashbacks to how they had the people act in GTA4', ">>{kanst} : Also Bannon's ideas embarrassed Trump. That Muslim ban was all Bannon/Miller and that ended up poorly for Trump. He won't forget that he was embarrassed because he listened to Bannon.", ">>{kwhitegocubs} : Serious question: why do so many here want Kushner to be fired? He's the voice of sanity in the administration. He brought in Zeke Emanuel to talk about healthcare *three times*. He has been bringing in moderate Democratic strategists to talk to Trump or shape policy lately. He fundraised for Cory Booker among others. He's a moderate/liberal, who might be able to restore Trump to his vaguely moderate/liberal stance in the 90s. He's basically the Obi Wan Kenobi of this administration (our only hope).", '>>{wellitsbouttime} : both of them are grey foxes. You know what Mike Pence would look great wearing? a ball gag.', '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : Nobody supports Kushner. Liberals just enjoy cockroaches eating each other on the right.', ">>{Scrimshawmud} : I'm gonna guess he has some vintage Hugo boss uniforms he and his wife wear. He calls her Eva in private and Mother in public.", '>>{Scrimshawmud} : He covered up Flynn being compromised for WEEKS after the justice dept. Hand delivered a note letting him know, and only came out with it when it was in the newspaper. If anyone goes down for collusion it better be Pence.', '>>{BlueBeowulf2001} : No. Kushner is as bad if not worse.', ">>{BlueBeowulf2001} : He's not liberal. He's blatantly corrupt and our nation's policy is being dictated so that he and his family make billions. That doesn't even address the fact that he's a Israeli stooge who's given shitloads of $ to ultra right wing Jewish settlers in Israel.", ">>{Nomandate} : I say set them both on fire. That's what we're talking about, right?", '>>{I_Am_Dwight_Snoot} : Age of account and account history (no posts just retweets, no picture) is a relatively quick way to tell.', ">>{fastplayerpiano} : The point isn't that he is less guilty or evil, only less emotional, stupid, and insane.", '>>{Ikimasen} : Hopefully there will be a Team Jared/Team Steve Burger King tie-in.', '>>{kwhitegocubs} : Riiiiiiight. Cool, then you can yearn for Pence or Bannon, then. Have fun.', '>>{Andyklah} : We want their house of cards to fall. Not to play poker from it. Kushner is implicated in the Russia scandal even harder than Pence.', ">>{kwhitegocubs} : There's no escape, though. If somehow, in madness, Pence, Bannon, Trump, and Kushner all go away, there's Ryan. If I am faced with corrupt or evil people, I'd rather have the lifelong moderate liberal who has fundraised for Democrats for years in the WH... rather than anyone else. Even if he's also a corrupt asshole.", '>>{cficare} : We really need to get that #DeathTo tag working....i mean trended.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{apolitic} : #FireBannon and #FireKushner trend on Twitter amid reports of WH feud', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : I wonder how much of the latter is bots afraid of losing bannon', '>>{BUNKBUSTER} : Post Bannon\\kushner gay clown pics please. Vlad needs a distraction.', ">>{angstybagels} : Tbh if you think Trump would fire Kushner you're completely delusional. We need impeachment stat.", ">>{pravenone} : Fuck a firing. Let's get a fight to the death. Thunderdome these sycophants.", ">>{ColePhelps-} : This will make Trump's blood boil. It pleases me to know he hates that we are gaining ground against him. Soon he and his ilk will be cornered like the rats they are.", ">>{Infidel8} : The #FireKushner trend was mostly bots and trolls. So, I think we know whose side Putin is on. The funny thing to me is that bot traffic is relatively obvious now, given everything we've learned over the last 6 months. But right-wingers seem totally oblivious to it. The #SyriaHoax tag from the other day was a perfect example.", '>>{ent4rent} : Picking sides? More like get them both out.', '>>{thenoidednugget} : Where were you when politics became a Twilight fandom?', '>>{newocean} : Whenever two people on my Skype list share a birthday... I send them both this --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Oq6vztcjgg <-- I suppose it could be used here as well...', '>>{Kung_Fu_ActionJesus} : I was entirely on board with the "Trump is just a Bannon puppet" idea not too long ago. Seeing Bannon fumble around recently has been refreshing to say the least, but Trump is still here, so it\'s not all rainbows and sunshine just yet.', ">>{elfradlschneck} : I don't use Twitter. Could you briefly explain why the bot traffic is obvious?", '>>{Battaglia} : Bannon is so ugly. Pls just go away bruh', ">>{Woxat} : I'd assume it's the mans son in law but one guy has a whole entire lunatic fanbase so.", ">>{Woxat} : I'd be panicking too if my source of income was threatened.", '>>{pravenone} : I imagine less golden wings, more slap fighting, and heavier breathing. But pretty on point.', '>>{TRUMPSBOMB} : Not Twitter hashtags! Whatever will the both of them do?', ">>{RosneftTrump2020} : There are analytics as to the source of trending tags. But I haven't seen them.", '>>{woowoodoc} : Every day, this administration manages to sink to new levels of embarrassment.', '>>{gotsafe} : We care not for American politics and....... java.lang.exception.NullPointerException', '>>{travio} : Pence could actually get things done. That could be worse.', ">>{mehkko} : I don't know. Well, at least Pence won't waste money on golfing, keeping his wife in NYC, missile distractions and a useless wall. Don't know if tourism will recover under him though.", ">>{pegothejerk} : Every time one man leave the dome he gets to make a piece of legislation. And it can't more a wish for more legislation or no more legislation.", ">>{THEREALKGB} : Yes yes we like the Levi's jeans very much We drink whiskey not vodka", ">>{morbidexpression} : seems to be failing at doing anything with healthcare. I'd much prefer a scandal-clogged Pence as lame duck.", '>>{just_a_timetraveller} : Wow our government has devolved into #TeamBannon vs #TeamKushner. Next nominations will setup like The Voice where a rep from each branch of government will get to turn their chairs in approval of a new president', ">>{Film_Director} : There's a copy of the hashtag origin map in this article. https://medium.com/@MJGWrites/for-those-of-you-not-on-twitter-today-it-was-pretty-amazing-to-actually-witness-the-russian-bots-bcb72c5ce982?source=linkShare-c6c39d987d40-1491643856", '>>{its_a_me_garri_oh} : Babe Ruth is my favorite sports tzar, cheer for home run Also like playing with football that is not round, i say to friend: komrade, throw to me pig skin! Happy times.', '>>{not_MI6_not_CIA} : Both. Bots lead, those unfortunate enough to buy into the lies follow', '>>{ButlerianJihadist} : How is that a proof of anything? And what is it supposed to prove - that the hashtag originated in the UK?', '>>{Tempus_Fugitive} : And like the rest of Trumps bombs, you missed your mark.', '>>{notjabba} : In hoping they all make up and then everyone in the White House gets together for a celebratory snapshot with the photographer from King Ralph.', ">>{Daemonic_One} : No. It shows the countries external to the US pushing the tag the heaviest were Russia, India, Iran, UK, Spain, and Chile. Analysis would suggest it to be unlikely that the source of the tag itself would come from the UK or Spain, though UK likely has a developed presence of both botnets and unknowing supporters post-Brexit. Of the others, the most likely leader in any action would be Russia; I'd be inclined to say Iran and India could be just points of large groups of infected systems passing out the information, as well as paid shills to push the tags. I'm kind of curious why Chile is so far up there though. EDIT: Just my take. I'd be interested if anyone could inform the analysis more.", '>>{wellitsbouttime} : I just want anderson cooper to fuck him and release the tape. Everyone knowing just how gay mike pence really is will crush any political will he has. Anderson, please. You have the access. You have the jawline. Do it for your country.', '>>{OliverQ27} : So if Bannon and Priebus get fired, do you think things will improve, or will it cause more issues?', '>>{ButlerianJihadist} : > Analysis would suggest What analysis? Where is it? > UK likely has a developed presence of both botnets and unknowing supporters post-Brexit So why isnt there an even bigger botnet in the US that would start the hashtag? This demented russophobia is making zero sense.', '>>{Gonzanic} : Someone should start a "shutupthebothsofyouse" hash tag.', ">>{Macracanthorhynchus} : NoDoz, Ambien, Claritin - that's a recipe for one weird afternoon.", ">>{IK00} : Trump is very much his own man - the problem is he's extraordinarily easy to manipulate (because he's a complete moron and a demented old man to boot). If you get cocky/incompetent and clue him into your manipulation, his ego is bruised and he'll turn on you. Bannon flew too close to the sun and made his machinations obvious even to demented old Trump. The only criminal masterminds we're dealing with are the Russians. Everyone else is a bumbling pawn who happened to control resources useful to the Russians.", '>>{Armin-Tamzarian-} : You can\'t just "fire" the president. Jared Kushner would have to be removed by impeachment.', '>>{0ldgrumpy1} : Depends on who he gets to replace them, most likely another corrupt businessman or another conspiracy nut. Hard as it might be to believe, he could actually do worse.', '>>{HeTalksToComputers} : The ratio of bots to actual users would much lower in the US than say India where I doubt Trump has much grassroots support.', ">>{tbaskerv138} : I hate him. He's actually turned this into a reality show. Are you #teamBannon or #teamKushner? Cast your votes and find out who stays and who goes, Monday at 8!", '>>{ChrisTosi} : Dude, they just love that their shitposts get thousands of likes and upvotes and retweets and whatever fucking else metric they use to validate their shitty opinions that never fly in real life because they get shunned for being so obviously stupid. They don\'t care to look any deeper than, "There are others out there who think just like me!"', ">>{ChrisTosi} : Ehh...give him another few months and he'll get the hang of it. It turns out all you need to gain popularity in this country is to start lobbing missiles at things. We can blow up Somali Pirates, empty bases in Syria, shit in Yemen, parts of Mosul, etc. Maybe we can strike up a deal with NK to bomb some of their empty silos in exchange for rice. Maybe we'll throw in some Spam if Kim Jong-Un broadcasts a picture of himself defiantly shaking his fist. get the military industrial complex humming again! we need more ammo! make ammo great again! fuck", '>>{ButlerianJihadist} : But this unsourced graph appears to show the origin of the hashtag not the ratio of whatever.', ">>{AWright32} : I'm surprised with how anti-war this sub has been in the past they would be pro-interventionist Kushner. You want a war with Syria? Support Kushner and watch it happen.", '>>{reelznfeelz} : Reminds me of that Black Mirror episode with the mechanical bees.', ">>{ramonycajones} : Pence has no cult of personality, he's just unpopular, so at least he's a one-term problem. And he's not looking to destroy the international order, so, that's a plus.", ">>{A_FVCKING_UNICORN} : I'm legitimately thinking Pence couldn't be worse than Trump at this point. That's how low the bar is.", ">>{HankPeppercorn} : I'd still watch the shit out of that tape though...", '>>{TheManWhoWasNotShort} : Personally, I support the chaos. Fire both!', '>>{Bowman2} : But he would be the patriot thay we needed.', '>>{JohnTitor2020} : > i say to friend: komrade, throw to me pig skin! Happy times. And then I had flashbacks to how they had the people act in GTA4', ">>{kanst} : Also Bannon's ideas embarrassed Trump. That Muslim ban was all Bannon/Miller and that ended up poorly for Trump. He won't forget that he was embarrassed because he listened to Bannon.", ">>{kwhitegocubs} : Serious question: why do so many here want Kushner to be fired? He's the voice of sanity in the administration. He brought in Zeke Emanuel to talk about healthcare *three times*. He has been bringing in moderate Democratic strategists to talk to Trump or shape policy lately. He fundraised for Cory Booker among others. He's a moderate/liberal, who might be able to restore Trump to his vaguely moderate/liberal stance in the 90s. He's basically the Obi Wan Kenobi of this administration (our only hope).", '>>{wellitsbouttime} : both of them are grey foxes. You know what Mike Pence would look great wearing? a ball gag.', '>>{MafiaVsNinja} : Nobody supports Kushner. Liberals just enjoy cockroaches eating each other on the right.', ">>{Scrimshawmud} : I'm gonna guess he has some vintage Hugo boss uniforms he and his wife wear. He calls her Eva in private and Mother in public.", '>>{Scrimshawmud} : He covered up Flynn being compromised for WEEKS after the justice dept. Hand delivered a note letting him know, and only came out with it when it was in the newspaper. If anyone goes down for collusion it better be Pence.', '>>{BlueBeowulf2001} : No. Kushner is as bad if not worse.', ">>{BlueBeowulf2001} : He's not liberal. He's blatantly corrupt and our nation's policy is being dictated so that he and his family make billions. That doesn't even address the fact that he's a Israeli stooge who's given shitloads of $ to ultra right wing Jewish settlers in Israel.", ">>{Nomandate} : I say set them both on fire. That's what we're talking about, right?", '>>{I_Am_Dwight_Snoot} : Age of account and account history (no posts just retweets, no picture) is a relatively quick way to tell.', ">>{fastplayerpiano} : The point isn't that he is less guilty or evil, only less emotional, stupid, and insane.", '>>{Ikimasen} : Hopefully there will be a Team Jared/Team Steve Burger King tie-in.', '>>{kwhitegocubs} : Riiiiiiight. Cool, then you can yearn for Pence or Bannon, then. Have fun.', '>>{Andyklah} : We want their house of cards to fall. Not to play poker from it. Kushner is implicated in the Russia scandal even harder than Pence.', ">>{kwhitegocubs} : There's no escape, though. If somehow, in madness, Pence, Bannon, Trump, and Kushner all go away, there's Ryan. If I am faced with corrupt or evil people, I'd rather have the lifelong moderate liberal who has fundraised for Democrats for years in the WH... rather than anyone else. Even if he's also a corrupt asshole.", '>>{cficare} : We really need to get that #DeathTo tag working....i mean trended.'], ['>>{Johnsmitish} : Eric Trump: Father won’t be ‘pushed around’ by Putin', ">>{Usawasfun} : Why is Eric talking so much. I like it when the president's kids just kind of don't have much input, especially when they are running his business.", '>>{deebaggus} : No pushing necessary...Trump will do as he is told or it is Kompromat Time.', '>>{malpais} : Please dont throw me in the brier patch Mistuh Putin.', ">>{GrumblePuff} : Sorry Eric, but Putin's cock is so far up your daddy's ass he's licking the tip.", '>>{HankMoody_} : All of the other kids talking this much really gives one an appreciation for Tiffany. Keeping doing you, girl.', ">>{uhuhuhu} : Unlike Obama's daughters, Eric is an adult with his own opinion about the issues.", '>>{conanthecnidarian} : If Ivanka was able to sway him so easily, Putin will have no trouble at all.', '>>{Mawontalk} : Donald Trump and his son, Eric, remind me of [Sylvester the Cat and his son, Junior](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x_FzCWl2nc).', ">>{IPeedOnTrumpAMA} : Puppets don't get pushed around. They get their stings pulled or the giant hand up their ass makes their mouth move.", ">>{Usawasfun} : Sure. So is every adult, Eric's opinions don't really matter. I'm just saying I thought they were going to try and separate the business and politics, obviously they aren't going to do that.", '>>{Misanthraloperer} : Eric reminds me a bit of Carter Page. He just keeps yapping and yapping and revealing all these uncomfortable truths about President Bigly.', '>>{Motagada} : Is it weird that the only males i associate with saying "father" are british and rich brat kids. and i mean that with absolutely no disrespect to british people', '>>{The_Killing_Road} : And what do you think will happen when Putin feels he no longer can "push" your daddy around? One might think he will then have no use for Trump and may "leak" something damaging. Strap in kiddo.', ">>{Misanthraloperer} : No puppet! No puppet! He's more like a Muppet. A big, orange, mussy haired Muppet.", ">>{TitanKS} : I say keep talking. He's just compounding the dumb pile.", '>>{JakeLV426} : He may grab him by his hair and move his head up and down faster though', ">>{recruit00} : I'm fine with Eric talking as he always reveals something we didn't know.", ">>{thewholedamnplanet} : No but he will be bought and sold and he will do as he's told.", ">>{LeMot-Juste} : Tiffany hasn't had her surgical upgrade yet, like her half sister.", '>>{Huckleberry_Win} : [My impression of Donald Trump standing up to Putin](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJYInp-W_ww)', '>>{ChumpAdministration} : Eric Trump seems like the biggest fuckin weasel faced pussy boy I\'ve ever seen. Like the kind of guy who would say "MY DAD OWNS HALO AND WILL BAN U" unironically.', '>>{Nan0machines} : > Eric Trump later added: *wink wink*', ">>{ShakeyBobWillis} : Duh. Who pushes something they have on a leash? That doesn't make any sense. They follow behind like a good little gimp.", '>>{StayGold1850} : Every day Trump wakes up and is still President, Putin wins by default.', '>>{FDRs_ghost} : No, Trump is more like a sock puppet that Putin has his arm up to the elbow in the hinder.'], ['>>{l3lack1} : Obamacare Repeal Would Leave 18 Million Uninsured, Send Premiums Soaring: Report', ">>{Ouroboros000} : No kiddin'. I love the people who are replying to my health insurer related posts arguing how much big insurers LOVE the ACA - which of course is pure BS.", '>>{typical_bro} : This is a report from the Congressional Budget Office. Not polls.', '>>{frackpot} : With 18 million losing coverage, how many health care workers are soon to be unemployed?', '>>{zherok} : She did. Trump won by a fairly small margin in a handful of states, while losing the popular vote by a rather large margin. A 90% chance of occurring still leaves a 10% chance to not occur. Not that this changes the point of the article, a hypothetical situation: remove healthcare from existing ACA users, and about 18 million people no longer have healthcare.', '>>{hawaiimanila} : How\'s that protest vote working out for you Bernie bros? never forget that politics is compromise and voting for the "lesser evil\' is not as bad as it sounds', '>>{Rantheur} : They have a love-hate relationship with the ACA. On the one hand, they love that everybody is required by law to have health insurance. On the other hand, they hate that they actually have to pay out for health care. Unfortunately, the insurance giants (and most corporations these days) focus only on the short term and miss the big picture. In the case of health insurance, paying for routine preventative care is cheaper than having to cover a catastrophic illness. A regular checkup costs, on average, about $100 annually. Let\'s also multiply that by the current life expectancy of a US citizen, 78.74 years. The lifetime cost of regular checkups for a human being is only $7874. On average, health insurance costs $286 (monthly) for individuals and $727 (monthly) for a family. In a single year where a customer doesn\'t suffer from a major illness or accident, the insurance company makes $3332 on an individual. For a family of four, if they all remain healthy and all get an annual checkup, they make $8324 annually for the entire family. Now, let\'s look at the "rare" stubborn ass who never goes to the doctor for any reason at all and see what the insurance company makes over the course of his life. $270,235.68 Now keep in mind that insurance companies cover hundreds of people, so they\'re seeing more than that number annually. The ACA was a gift to the insurance companies and if they don\'t love it, it is purely because of their own avarice.', '>>{BerniellBustie} : Amazing. I hope the DNC gets everything coming to them.', '>>{LAmoderate7} : Below is movement of health insurance company stock since ACA was signed into law: Cigna up 316% Anthem up 173% UnitedHealth Group up 349% Aetna up 310% Humana up 248% S&P 500 up 92% Boy I am sure they are super mad!', '>>{LAmoderate7} : Paul Ryan finished the draft of the replacement, which he will be releasing next week. He also said they will not repeal without a replacement. The 18 million number, while accurate, is meaningless to share', '>>{Ouroboros000} : Yeah, up because they are betting that the ACA is coming to an end.', '>>{Ouroboros000} : > it is purely because of their own avarice. And avarice is one thing they have a lot of to spare.', ">>{LAmoderate7} : Right, the bet that has been going on since October 2010. Your theory may be plausible if I presented change in share price since election day, but as it stands, the stock charts don't match your narrative.", '>>{Ouroboros000} : You are just cherry picking and you know it.', '>>{wakaswag} : If she had a 90% chance then Trump had a 10% chance which is still a chance... Your criticism is dumb and your life is boring and useless', '>>{LAmoderate7} : Yeah I cherry picked the five largest health insurance companies lol who else would you pick? What are you talking about?? I even included the S&P 500 for reference.', '>>{Ouroboros000} : >[Busted! Health Insurers Secretly Spent Huge To Defeat Health Care Reform While Pretending To Support Obamacare](http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/06/25/busted-health-insurers-secretly-spent-huge-to-defeat-health-care-reform-while-pretending-to-support-obamacare/#34dd7a4c16c7) >>According to the National Journal’s Influence Alley, at the very same time the American HealthInsurance Plans (AHIP)—the health insurance industry super lobby—was cutting a deal with the White House leading to its stated support of the proposed Obamacare legislation, **they were secretly funneling huge amounts money to the Chamber of Commerce to be spent on advertising designed to convince the public that the legislation should be defeated**. >>...So, why would AHIP try to secretly destroy a legislative scheme that would drive millions of new customers into their arms thanks to the mandated insurance provisions? (...) it was all about the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)—the provision of the ACA that not only requires the health insurance companies to spend 80 percent of your premium dollars on actual health care expenditures, but further requires that they refund to their customers any amounts they fail to spend as required by the MLR.', ">>{TheDon2016} : Why would premiums rise? Right now premiums are rising because the middle class is being forced to subsidize 20 million people receiving free insurance and also being forced to buy coverage for stuff they don't need or want.", '>>{LAmoderate7} : Again, I am sure they are super pissed their equity value has doubled to tripled since the ACA went into effect. I do not understand why you are arguing this? Publicly available market data on the five largest insurance companies. There is not as much subjectivity as you think.', '>>{Ouroboros000} : > I do not understand why you are arguing this? Because the GOP is torpedoing the ACA precisely BECAUSE of these people who you are ridiculously portraying as innocent parties.', ">>{LAmoderate7} : How am I portraying them as innocent parties? I am arguing against your stance that big health insurance companies don't like the ACA. They have seen equity growth WELL above market average since ACA was written into law. Why are you so insistent that these companies hate doubling and tripling in value?", ">>{Ouroboros000} : > How am I portraying them as innocent parties? You are playing 'innocent' right now in pretending not to understand what I'm saying.", '>>{LAmoderate7} : You are literally ignoring concrete evidence health insurance companies did well under ACA, a statement which you said was false in your first post.', '>>{cd411} : The main reason it\'s taking Ryan so long (8 years) to come up with a replacement for Obamacare is [today\'s Affordable Care Act is very similar to the privatized mandate plan the Republicans pushed for 40 years (Romnycare).](http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/ct-this-is-why-republicans-can-t-find-a-replacement-for-obamacare-20170106-story.html) Ryan and the Republicans obviously don\'t want any replacement.....[**They want to eliminate Medicare too.**](https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/11/15/paul-ryans-plan-to-phase-out-medicare-is-just-what-democrats-need/?utm_term=.db2572fc619c) And to think, auditoriums full of cheering suckers with GOP kick me signs taped to their back voted to lose their own healthcare *and* [many rural hospitals](https://www.insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/rural-hospitals-brace-damage-aca-repeal) when they elected "America\'s first East Coast elite" Billionaire president who plans on ruling from his [golden chair in his 3 story, 100 million dollar, 5th avenue, New York city penthouse! with his stripper wife](http://imgur.com/a/E2U5N) and his silverspoon kids who will never want for anything. Do they look worried about healtcare? At this late date the onus is on Ryan to produce a "workable" Plan. Until then all bets are off.', ">>{MrsChanandalerBong} : https://www.google.com/amp/www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2017/01/08/as-obamacare-repeal-looms-hospitals-brace-for-job-losses/?client=safari Conservative estimates are 2.5 million,but it's Trump so we best not underestimate.", ">>{politicsthrow} : >Right now premiums are rising because the middle class is being forced to subsidize 20 million people receiving free insurance That's not how the subsidies are funded. Subsidies are funded by an additional Medicare tax on those making $200k ($250k for a couple) and up. They aren't funded by premium increases. >buy coverage for stuff they don't need or want. All of those extras...the birth control mandate, the preventive services coverage, keeping kids on parents insurance until 26, maternity coverage, removal of lifetime caps, etc...only increase a premium by less than 5%. Premiums would rise because those who don't think they need insurance would not purchase insurance. You'd be left with only sick people who need insurance in the risk pool. That would absolutely cause premiums to skyrocket in the individual market especially if pre-existing conditions are to remain covered. The only way to get premiums down would be to drop insurance on these people. If you're comfortable with letting people die, then yeah, insurance can come down...a lot.", ">>{MannToots} : > BECAUSE of these people who you are ridiculously portraying as innocent parties. I'm just hopping in now having read both of you going back and forth up until now. That's not at all what he was saying. He was simply responding to > how much big insurers LOVE the ACA - which of course is pure BS. with actual real world proof many of those exact big insurers have made tons of money on the ACA which is a 100% rebuttle of your claim. You sound desperate since you're moving the goal post so much on /u/LAmoderate7", '>>{DontMicrowaveCats} : To be fair there is a lot of sensationalism going on with this. The 18 million figure presents the absolute worst case scenario of a total repeal with no viable replacement and a lot of bad things falling into place. Evil as some of these guys may be, I don\'t see them enacting something that will cause 18 million people to lose coverage without replacement. They still care about votes afterall. The fact is this is all just a play to turn "Obamacare" into "Trump Care". Their new bill will inevitably have the same basic foundation of the ACA. Both sides admit there are a lot of holes in the current system....the ACA is just a bandaid on a broken machine. Im covered myself under it and see a lot of the problems firsthand. So I\'m keeping my fingers crossed they\'re going to fix some of those issues with this. If they have to turn it into "Trump Care" to get it fixed, then I support it personally. I\'m not sad to see Obamacare go and I\'m willing to give the GOP a chance to present a better alternative. We\'ll see soon enough if that will happen.', '>>{angelcake} : Perhaps headlines should read ACA repeal instead of Obamacare repeal. There are apparently still are a lot of people who think they are two separate things.', ">>{Brobacca} : I mean the ACA is like the most republican plan ever.... subsidies for citizens to purchase insurance from private companies in a well-regulated market. I can't believe they will deny reality to win political points with idiots who don't even realize Obamacare and the ACA are literally the same thing.", ">>{buttpup} : Yeah because we're all being fined if we don't have it.", '>>{PrometheusSmith} : It probably has something to do with the fact that the [cost of US healthcare](https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/highlights.pdf) is much higher than most people realize. The average person incurs just under $10,000 in healthcare costs per year. If you average it over the number of people that [actually can pay](https://www.reference.com/government-politics/many-adults-live-usa-b830ecdfb6047660) for healthcare, that number goes up by over 30%. Between your tax dollars that fund Medicare, Medicaid, and what you spend on health insurance, every American pays into that pot of money spent on our health.', ">>{politicsthrow} : > Then why did my insurance go from $140/month (dropped plan) to $400/month with a $7,500 deductible $7500 exceeds the maximum legally allowed out of pocket limit, so, that's just not accurate. Also, looking at your post history, that number seems to jump around willy nilly. You don't actually have insurance, do you? Are you just one of the numerous paid Trump supporters? Your premiums went up because people are using their insurance. That's the only reason. Sick people can't be denied coverage. >Also all insurers pulled out my states and the only one left is mainly BCBS They'll all be gone in a bit as soon as the Republicans repeal.", ">>{politicsthrow} : >$7500 exceeds the maximum legally allowed out of pocket? https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/out-of-pocket-maximum-limit/ >I'm assuming you are on a subsidized plan (make under $40k/year). Nope. Fully insured by the company I work for. Which is better than being uninsured like yourself. How much is Trump paying you these days?", ">>{politicsthrow} : Typical paid Trump supporter. Can't argue the facts. Get lost, kid.", ">>{politicsthrow} : What exactly does Hillary have to do with Republican policy that will increase your insurance premium or completely eliminate the individual market in your state? That's all on your boss and his party.", '>>{TheShishkabob} : Everything points to it actually slowing the rate the premiums increased. Did you not pay for insurance before it was implemented?', ">>{mephodross} : 2013 is was about 66$ a month thro work. Now the cheapest I can get is about 200$ a month thro work. I'm just one person but I know I'm not alone on this.", ">>{mreniac} : How long have you been buying health insurance for yourself? Even during the mid/late 90s, through the 2000s, it ended up costing you more every damn year. After the ACA, its continued to climb, but in many cases not as steeply, and with more people able to just go to the doctor before an emergency room visit is involved. No pre-existing, on your parents plan until 26 (so you can get through college/apprenticeships). Its a Heritage Foundation plan, this was 'the plan'. Now the GOP is all butt-hurt the Dem got it done. Deliver an answer or fuck off.", '>>{Ouroboros000} : > big insurers have made tons of money on the ACA And they expect to make a lot more without it >on /u/LAmoderate7 I have no idea what that is', ">>{mreniac} : Trying to raise a family of four on 36,000 a year is going to be hard any way you cut it, but you're looking at around 1200/month for insurance. Given a subsidy of about a thousand dollars every month (as calculated by http://kff.org/) you're only going to pay only around 200 bucks a month.", ">>{MannToots} : > And they expect to make a lot more without it That doesn't mean it refutes what he said. It's still 100% a fact they profited greatly on the ACA. The fact they could have made more is irrelevant against that fact since it doesn't prove it wrong. > I have no idea what that is The person you were talking to. :-/", ">>{Ouroboros000} : > It's still 100% a fact they profited greatly on the ACA And they will profit 100% more if its repealed.", ">>{MannToots} : That's irrelevant to the point being made and does not conflict with it at all. Your post serves no point to further this discussion at all. I guess we're done here."]]

classify and reply

['>>{chrismola} : Spicer: President Trump Taking Message of Success Directly to America Around Inaccurate ‘Filter of the Mainstream Media’', ">>{Origamiface} : We've been asking the wrong question: tech columnist David Pogue claims removing the headphone jack is how Apple fit the 7's improved features.", '>>{justeducation} : With that logic, iPhone 8 will remove Lightning port for more new features. Then iPhone 9 remove SIM slot for more new features. The man who sold the world.', ">>{trusk89} : Ok, but on the other hand, it doesn't have stereo speakers, if you put it that way. And also, it's thicker. Apple doesn't do thicker phones, remember? Even though no one will have an issue with 1mm more for a couple of hours of more battery life.", ">>{stanxv} : Trump 'Thrilled' to Nominate Ben Carson as Housing, Urban Development Secretary", '>>{TyrionLan1ster} : I thought I just woke up. Am I still dreaming?', '>>{Fatandmean} : F to the U to the C and the K Breitbart.', ">>{trusk89} : > How is this even relevant to having no headphone jack? It's one of the reasons listed in the article for removing the jack. I was saying that it's not just the battery.", ">>{Ask10101} : State sponsored media. Don't click. Don't support.", '>>{zyme86} : Accomplish what? A record for court defeats in the first month?', '>>{N8theGr8} : Why Ben Carson? I would have figured Trump would have picked the "these housing prices are too damn high" guy from the ever popular meme.', '>>{Riadyt} : Can I become a brain surgeon without any knowledge in that regard?', ">>{GavinGT} : Because he's black and...that's the only reason really.", ">>{Rhantoric} : Based on Ben Carson's extensive qualifications and pertinent knowledge, no doubt. /s On a semi-related note, I wish there was a better way to denote sarcasm. I nominate backwards slanting italics. Someone please tell Trump that a liberal said it was a bad idea.", '>>{trusk89} : [The camera is on a gyro](https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+7+Plus+Teardown/67384)', '>>{Tridamos} : > "Trump lies directly to dum-dums with no one to point out the many ways in which he is wrong first"', '>>{TheMovingFinger} : > Message of Success Won’t need all 140 characters', ">>{as_a_black_guy} : This is like Arby's calling Wendy's mainstream fast food.", '>>{ihavesexwith} : HUD = Urban. Urban = Black people. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/10/trump-african-american-inner-city/503744/', '>>{Origamiface} : Apl: hey guys it took courage but we removed the CPU to make room for this U2 album and a bigger taptic engine. Edit: iPogue http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=hwlshw&s=9', '>>{Drunk_and_High} : And this guy is payed to say what he says.', ">>{CarmineFields} : He's been told that his inaugral crowds circled Neptune.", '>>{idgitsinamerica} : Breitbart= state propaganda. Do not click, do not pass go. Straight to the toilet with it.', '>>{gabagool69} : How ESPN Went from America’s Sports Network to That Guy in the Bar Who Won’t Shut Up About Politics', '>>{JoeKkerr} : Umm, samsung and others did it with a button that presses down and still more water resistant than iphones...maybe they just needed a reason to charge', ">>{FewerMoonves} : Far be it from me to offer advice to Team Trump...but so long as there is a First Amendment, there will be an independent, multifaceted press. Some of which will, inevitably, be adversarial toward you. But declaring war on the 'mainstream' press as a whole is not a sound long-term strategy.", ">>{ihavesexwith} : I've honestly never needed an /s. It's almost always clear from the writing style who a Trump supporter is and who a liberal is.", '>>{walrus_of_fate} : What fucking features? The Iphone 7 is still nearly a generation behind most popular android phones. Hell, most budget android phones have features that apple has thus far refused to adopt. The headphone jack was removed because Apple wants to sell more wireless pairs of Beats. It has nothing to do with features.', ">>{YouSnowNothingJon} : Between the Comey meeting, McCain's latest comments, and Trump's latest meltdown, I have to believe that something huge is about to be made public. What I fear most is, even if something does stick and ultimately leads to his demise, he has set such a dangerous precedent for future candidates that we'll never be able to fully recover from this. Someone far more intelligent and savy could come along in the near future and perfect his scary fucking tactics (and I'd like to think that people will have learned their lesson after all is said and done, but Trump's regressive, delusional base and their fervent support indicates otherwise.) I'm also terrified to see how those mouth-breathers are going to react when their orange, narcissistic man-child gets kicked out of TWH. Wouldn't be surprised if his followers try and usher in the end of times. It's going to lead to an extremist religious right the likes of which we never could have imagined.", ">>{Ximitar} : Not necessarily. One could quote Trump all day and make the case that he's a blithering idiot, or one could quote Trump all day and insist that he is America's Messiah: the same quotes could be used to bolster either argument. Trumpism is in the eye of the beholder.", '>>{compounding} : Uh, what hardware features is the iPhone “a generation behind” in? The only thing I can imagine is screen (matters if you are doing VR I guess), and ram (where the iPhone actually holds more in memory than popular Android flagships, so the number itself is relatively meaningless). In contrast as an Android fan, I’m actually pretty annoyed that not one top Android phones has caught up to last generation’s iPhone with regards to some really critical (for me) areas where the iPhone excels: * CPU (Especially single thread performance which matters most for UI and most apps) * GPU (Especially when in use for long periods of gaming) * NVMe storage (which has a huge impact on cold load times) * Hardware (non-CPU) based FDE (no overhead penalty like when using the CPU for encryption) * Passcode hashing with hardware-only keys to prevent off-device passcode cracking (Qualcomm’s implementation is [totally broken](http://www.slashgear.com/android-soc-security-keys-extracted-qualcomm-trustzone-in-question-31442245/)) Its pretty hard to look at those key features where Apple is dominant and claim with a straight face that they are “nearly a generation behind” when that only applies to VR capacity and the headphone jack.', ">>{ihavesexwith} : Please, give me the Trump quotes that you believe makes him seem like America's Messiah. I just have to know.", ">>{picklejewce} : What's the over under on this administrative tire fire going completely up in flames?", '>>{muffler48} : Pence is going around talking like he is already President. He knows something too.', ">>{walrus_of_fate} : Processor isn't truly quad core. Less ram. No oled screen. No fast charging. It's less powerful and almost twice the price.", ">>{getridofappleskitle} : being political is the new trend, i mean look at how MTV tried and failed at trying to become political with their MTV news youtube channel, it's one of the most ridiculous things i have ever watched.", ">>{hillarysidiot} : Wow, really? So a real estate guy doesn't know anyone else that could be more qualified for **Housing and Urban Development**? Is this serious?", ">>{Ximitar} : There are none. I think he's a blithering idiot. My point was that the statements which make me think he's got some sort of neurological impairment will make other people think he's a gift from the gods. Same way some people love getting fucked in the ass; I get that they like it, but it's just not something that I think will ever appeal to me.", ">>{HollywoodCote} : The problem is... sports and politics aren't mutually exclusive. Some would argue Muhammad Ali was the most iconic athlete in modern history, but you can't have a real discussion about the man without paying attention to his political stances. Similar could go with Jesse Owens, John Carlos, Tommie Smith, Kareem Abdul-Jabar, and Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf. Black and white thought may make you comfortable, but life is complicated.", ">>{Filmiester} : Removing the sim wouldn't that be that bad of an idea actually. It's just a matter how to implement it", '>>{Stuckinaloop} : I think ESPN was better when it was mainly Australian Rules Football and Finnish Ice Racing.', '>>{Ximitar} : He thought it was "Urban Secretary of Housing Development" and limited his search to His Blacks^^TM.', ">>{hillarysidiot} : Is there really no one around him that said 'maybe we should think about this'?", ">>{liesthroughhisteeth} : >Americans live in a time when it seems like politics has invaded every facet of our lives. It's just because there is an ever increasing across the board level of stupidity that is almost impossible not to talk about...even by us non-Americans.", ">>{Ximitar} : Quietly, to themselves perhaps. I don't think The God Emperor likes people saying stuff like that to his face. To do so would be a vicious attack, after all, and he needs his safe space. It's unpatriotic to disagree with the President Elect.", ">>{rstcp} : You don't know for sure until you've tried it. I hear it's quite nice", '>>{YouSnowNothingJon} : Most definitely. The more we see him breaking stride with Trump (NATO, Russia), the more apparent it becomes that something is in the pipeline.', ">>{cowboysfan88} : They could just show highlights, if i wanted political stuff I'd watch a channel that's supposed to be for that", ">>{rstcp} : I think he genuinely has a problem filling the lower level cabinet positions. It's not a very high prestige job, and Trump is incredibly toxic to most actually qualified candidates. Who would risk the rest of their career and their social life for a position like that in a Trump administration?", '>>{125e125} : You guys have a lot of nerve trying to repeatedly submit this shit rag to r/politics. This might work on other subreddits but definitely not here. Give it the fuck up. Exercise in futility defined. All this does is give me more advertisement sponsors to contact so that I can further drain you down into bankruptcy.', ">>{ChrisFromLongIsland} : It's nice to know how Trump looked at all of the issues surrounding housing and the mortgage market in the US and hired the best person he could find. Someone who probably does not know what HUD stands for. I want this to be the first question asked in the press conference. HUD only has 8500 employees and a 46 billion dollar budget. You know what they say housing is not brain surgery.", ">>{achmedclaus} : What in the hell is a pothead brain surgeon going to know about housing and Urban development? It's because he's black isn't it?", '>>{xenopsych} : >The AP printed fake news this week, claiming inaccurately that the Trump administration was activating the National Guard to round up and remove illegal aliens. That is not true. Now we know why they are leaking these extreme drafts. Bannon wants to weaponize anything. He is getting desperate.', '>>{Lalzballzz} : The iPhone 7 is way way more powerful than any other phone on the market dude. Check literally any benchmark.', ">>{FewerMoonves} : You raise many good points. Pence may be in an unusually strong position to corral what has been traditionally understood as the 'religious right'--those voters concerned primarily with opposition to abortion and to a lesser extent gay rights--but it's an open question as to how numerous and powerful this group even is anymore. The Republican coalition that elected Donald Trump in 2016 is different in many ways than the Republican coalition that elected George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. George W played up the religious angle and took a more moderate position on immigration to attract evangelicals in the South and Midwest, as well as Hispanic voters in the West; Trump took a harder line on immigration, emphasized religion less, and took a very untraditional (by Republican standards) protectionist position on trade. As a result, Trump won 'Rust Belt' states which George W. Bush never did, while losing Western states to Hillary Clinton that Bush carried both times. In the event of Trump's resignation or impeachment and removal from office, it's hard to say whether Pence could maintain much of Trump's 'core' support. As a fairly traditional Republican, Pence shouldn't have much trouble hanging onto those Republican voters who 'fell in line' last November, regardless of how they felt about Trump individually. But whether it's Trump, Pence, or someone else as the Republican standard-bearer come 2020, I suspect that they will have a difficult time maintaining support in states he won narrowly in 2016 like Michigan and Pennsylvania, if a Republican administration can't deliver on Trump's promise to revitalize the American manufacturing industry in a big way. (Hard to see how anyone could, considering global economic trends). The more frightening variable, of course, is the nativist sentiment Trump successfully tapped into, which I suppose is never too far beneath the surface if a politician so flawed as Trump can stir it up in a big way. If Trump is ousted before the 2020 election, does he or some surrogate run as a 'spoiler' to spite the Republican 'establishment?' (Likely handing Democrats the White House in the process). Not implausible, considering Trump's famous vindictive streak.", '>>{LatinGeek} : >Would you rather have a headphone jack, or the new features? The headphone jack. Or they could not settle, and make the thing taller or thicker to make room for those extra features.', ">>{anonymous_4_custody} : As long as Carson doesn't end up in a room alone with him. Knowing Trump, he'll hit on his secretary the moment they're alone.", ">>{vootator} : Trump taking his desperate need for attention to the shrinking minority of supporters in America who have yet to realize how deeply he's shafted them.", ">>{dontbedenied} : That's how ESPN is in South America. Much better than the political BS you see in the USA.", ">>{treerat} : ESPN raises everybody's cable bill, while offering nothing.", ">>{mrpickleby} : I know everyone defines success differently, but how does he define it? Because I don't think this is what most people would consider a 'successful' presidency. Just sayin'.", '>>{bricolagefantasy} : At least they didn\'t try to claim that "dual camera" is their genius invention. Several other guys had it first. Apple still making phone with giant bazel like it\'s 2014. I am sure when they finally get a curved display, they will declare that as their genius invention. with courage.', '>>{TuLegit2quit} : The only time of the year that ESPN is useful is during college football due to the number of games they show. Even then I mute the TV to avoid all of the asinine commentary, plus Herbstreit hates my Dawgs.', '>>{one8sevenn} : This has given to the rise of other sports networks. http://www.forbes.com/sites/vincentfrank/2015/07/12/losing-millions-of-subscribers-espn-now-facing-tough-decisions/#7b6593724df4 ESPN is bleeding talent. They seem to not be able to get out of their own way.', '>>{YouSnowNothingJon} : Thanks for your response. It was both enlightening and reassuring. I\'m just so worried about this visceral fear/hate that Trump has tapped into. These members of the Alt-Right have felt so "misunderstood" for so long and they now feel as though their anger has been validated. Trump gave them a voice, gave them hope. What happens when that voice is ripped away? I can\'t shake the feeling that, in the event that their savior is ousted, acts of domestic terrorism from white nationalists are going to multiply ten-fold....manifest destiny and whatnot.', ">>{bricolagefantasy} : Apple cannot make multiple asymetric cores, because it is patented to death. Same with their lame GPU. Apple's only hope is to make longer pipe (throw more transistors). It works for awhile since apple buyers are willing to pay premium. But as you notice battery is kinda shit.", '>>{compounding} : By asymmetric are you referring to Big.Little architectures? Because Apple just released [that exact configuration](http://in.pcmag.com/apple-iphone-7/107654/opinion/with-a10-fusion-has-apple-moved-to-biglittle) Regardless though, even without Big.Little they were already better in high performance and low power consumption (due to race to sleep benefits), so afaik their battery *efficiency* is awesome. Its so good in fact that they choose a smaller battery than competitors and still get similar battery life.', '>>{Ninbyo} : A.k.a Steve "Rasputin" Bannon, former Breitbart CEO, is whispering in his ear about how America loves him and it\'s just the nasty media and liberals lying.', '>>{muffler48} : Look to his speech in Germany (i think yesterday). His position on NATO, Russia and US commitment appears to be more in line with normal than Trump and Bannon.', '>>{tbx5} : LJR is some of the worst right wing gutter press garbage I have seen in a while. Site is truly for low IQ wastes of oxygen.', '>>{bricolagefantasy} : > low power consumption you got to be kidding. big.little is ancient tech. It was from 2-3 yrs ago. I am willing to bet A10 cannot do arbitrary cores. Heterogenous is the latest. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VkSHUpfsCQ', ">>{JectorDelan} : >Or they could not settle, and make the thing taller or thicker to make room for those extra features. Well, that's just crazy talk!", ">>{XenuWorldOrder} : Twice the price of what? It's cheaper than the Note 7.", '>>{Squircle_MFT} : >this 52-year-old technology requires a relatively huge box to receive the plug. Phone makers can’t stand that thing. It’s in the way of making the battery bigger. It’s in the way of putting in a better camera, or nicer speakers I love how the author thinks apple will actually improve any of that', ">>{noseshimself} : It doesn't burn that nicely and won't keep you warm at night so it hast to be cheaper than Samsung.", ">>{noseshimself} : > (where the iPhone actually holds more in memory than popular Android flagships, so the number itself is relatively meaningless). ? I have to consult my LeEco Le Max 2 which I picked up travelling through Guangzhou to hear what it thinks about your statement, but right now it is laughing hysterically. My Wife's One+ is chiming in.", '>>{compounding} : See videos like [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRO30ujYBfA). The iPhone with 2GB of ram had every app pre-loaded and ready to go in the background during the second “lap”, but the One^+ had to reload several apps (especially games, but also the browser) because it wasn’t keeping them open in the background even with 6 GB of ram on the spec sheet. I don’t know what accounts for the discrepancy, but the experience for the user is that the iPhone often performs better at managing ram and keeping apps open than phones with 2x or even 3x the amount. Ultimately, no matter what the “number” is, what matters is how it performs, so it seems reasonable to dismiss the ram discrepancy if it still performs better than phones that are “maxed out” on ram anyway.', '>>{Calimariae} : Surely there has to be a better way than using a physical card sent in the mail by your provider.', '>>{Calimariae} : I hope they never start using curved displays. What a gimmick that is.', '>>{Filmiester} : Especially since phone providers want to charge you $20 for one', ">>{Calimariae} : They're free where I'm from. The technology just feels dated to me. I would assume it'd be possible to just feed that data directly into the device instead of having it separated on a physical card.", ">>{Calimariae} : There's certainly nothing retro about it. I fail to see the benefits of having a curved screen of any sort.", '>>{wowseriffic} : It was a joke about early CRTs, which were curved because it made beam aiming easier.', ">>{Calimariae} : Ah yeah, I should've gotten that one (having grown up with CRTs and all). They were bent the other way though :p", ">>{lendergle} : *Would you rather have a headphone jack — and give up the things that Apple put in its place? Like a bigger battery that lasts 2 hours longer. And a camera stabilizer that eliminates blurry shots. And stereo speakers.* Yes. Yes, I would definitely rather have a headphone jack and give up those things. Two more hours on a battery isn't worth bothering for. We're all used to charging up whenever close to a power source. It's not even a minor inconvenience. A camera stabilizer might be helpful for someone with Parkinson's (which is a huge tragedy, and I'm sorry for anyone who does have it), but I can't remember the last time I took a blurry shot that didn't involve moving the phone more than an inch. Stabilize THAT if you can. And stereo speakers? LOL, whut? Why would anyone play something requiring stereo output on a phone? If you need stereo, you play it on a (and I'm stretching a bit, but...) *stereo* system. Or put in your earphones/earbuds. That you plug into a little jack on your phone. That doesn't have a bunch of useless features.", '>>{jmnugent} : The iPhone 7 does actually (in reality) have a bigger Battery, better cameras and nicer speakers.', ">>{accountnumberseven} : That's literally what CDMA is, it's SIMless in concept while GSM requires the use of SIM cards. It's also why a lot of people want to keep SIM cards: a physical card means that you can take it out and put it into another phone without your provider's input, and the GSM standard allows any SIM card that already works on the network to work with any phone that also supports GSM networks. With SIMless systems you need to actually ask your provider to port your plan between phones.", ">>{JPN2214} : Honestly the SIM slot could and should be replaced by a software emulator. And I'd be pretty stoked about a completely wireless phone.", ">>{JPN2214} : Just as an opposing opinion, I'm honestly on the other side. The 3.5 jack isn't that useful for me. Cameras are.", '>>{Fa6ade} : They have already done this on the iPad. It has an internal Apple sim on the 3G versions that just lets you choose your carrier.', ">>{Fa6ade} : A lot of people record videos while moving. It's also useful for low light photos where the exposure time is longer.", ">>{mariestellamaris} : It's useless. Except for the hardware the iPhone hasn't really improved for years. The 2007 iPhone was squares on a screen, the 2016 iPhone is still squares on a screen. I don't really give a shit if it's a second faster than other phones as long as it doesn't do what similar phones have been doing for years.", ">>{Fatfaggottreat1} : Too bad they couldn't design a battery that doesn't explode and a stylus that doesn't insert backwards.", ">>{Arve} : The 3.5mm jack has a very odd shape (it will protrude 15-17 mm, possibly more with water sealing, and pretty much dictates the entire layout of the bottom fourth of the phone - the Lighting port, even in its new and slightly beefier form due to the water protection doesn't take up all that much space. How else do you imagine that the 7's battery grew by 14%? > Then iPhone 9 remove SIM slot for more new features. The SIM slot is probably on its way out, being replaced by embedded or soft SIM. [Here's more](http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/16/apple_samsung_sim_talks/). That's one thing you're not gonna miss once the transition has taken place, but you're going to shy away from any telecom operator that refuses to port you over to a new operator, and/or you're going to demand legislation to fix predatory operator practices. Once those bumps are over and done with, you aren't going to miss it, at all.", ">>{Arve} : > Umm, samsung and others did it with a button that presses down and still more water resistant than iphones Well, Samsung may have opted to slap IP68 on it, but real-world tests of the iPhone 7 shows that it's vastly outperforming its certified rating. Some relevant tests: * [iPhone 7 vs Galaxy S7 deep water test](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K05cTPeFfyM) * [Boiling an iPhone for 7 minutes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkG4-EgFOM8) It survived both of those, it survived iFixit keeping it submerged for hours, it survived being dunked in Cola and frozen. It's fair to say that when Apple said IP67, they were _very_ conservative.", ">>{Arve} : > A camera stabilizer might be helpful for someone with Parkinson's (which is a huge tragedy, and I'm sorry for anyone who does have it), but I can't remember the last time I took a blurry shot that didn't involve moving the phone more than an inch. Stabilize THAT if you can. Optical image stabilization isn't there to help people with Parkinson's, it's to provide much better hand-held low-light performance, because you can keep the shutter open for much longer during a night-time exposure. Camera vendors like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Leica, Fuji and others put these features on a lens because it improves the situation and usability of a camera under all circumstances, not just for a very select minority of people wielding a camera.", '>>{Lalzballzz} : That doesn\'t make any sense. A new phone is ONLY hardware. You could update the software without getting a new phone. When Apple includes android features they are "copying". When they don\'t they are "behind". When they have features android phones don\'t those features don\'t matter or are "gimmicks". When people (mistakenly) think the iPhone is weaker than android phones it\'s a huge deal. When they find out that the iPhone is about a year ahead of their competition in SoC and that their storage blows any android phone out of the water then it\'s "speed doesn\'t matter". Android phones are great but the constant moving of the goalposts by people who just can\'t see the good points about iPhones is tiresome. The variety is nice in the industry. Apple offers something different that a lot of people like and a lot of people don\'t. Don\'t see why people go so far towards one thing or another.', ">>{mariestellamaris} : Can you please show me a quote where I said anything about Android? Also, iPhone's hardwares have changed, but inside it's still the same old phone in 2016. Rows of squares, that's it. You can't really do anything with it, it's a severely limited phone.", '>>{omega2346} : My stylus won go in backwards, and who the fuck puts a stylus in backwards?', ">>{Fatfaggottreat1} : It's not hard to design a stylus that can't insert in backwards. Samsung doesn't really pay attention to the details, or test their phones properly.", ">>{omega2346} : Didn't I just say mine doesn't go in backwards. Because mine doesn't go in backwards. I can not get my S pen to insert backwards.", ">>{Corbs117} : Everyone is going to speculate, but I'll never buy it unless Apple announces it. In an era where everything is getting smaller and smaller while also getting bigger at the same time, I'll avoid the rumor.", '>>{base_chank1942} : Go ahead and bet, you will lose. The fusion architecture is exactly apples take on this type of architecture', '>>{aenigme} : Then buy the iPhone 6/6s...problem solved. [Or buy one of these](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01LYHVQB9/) [Or buy one of these](http://www.scosche.com/iphone-7-car-charger)', '>>{aenigme} : And better display, despite what those who only count pixels may say.', '>>{aenigme} : > No oled screen. OLED is not the holy grail. http://displaymate.com/iPhone7_ShootOut_1.htm', '>>{aenigme} : > Can you please show me a quote where I said anything about Android? Of course, we all knew you were referring to a Windows Phone or Nokia. Am I right? /s', ">>{MassiveFire} : Stupid engineers. Sacrificing some battery life is negliable, but using bluetooth for the earpods. They do realize that bluetooth eats up a lot more power than your typical DAC 3.5mm jack output. Oh, and how about making the phone bigger packing more battery and computing power, instead of making it so thin that it actually bends when sit on. And did they consider that using bluetooth also interferes with wifi? Yeah, those 2.4 and 2.5 ghz bands are completely fucked because of the iphone 7. And how about that front facing speakers? Oh, and if one of those earpods falls out while you're on the road, then good luck getting them back.", ">>{mariestellamaris} : There's a common saying that you make an ass of yourself when you assume things. You just made an ass of yourself. I own a Lumia as a second phone and it's definitely more useful than any iPhone. So don't be an idiot putting words into people's mouth.", ">>{aenigme} : *Can you please show me a quote where I said anything about you owning an Android? Please, don't be an idiot putting words into people's mouth.* And BTW...that's not how that saying goes.", ">>{mariestellamaris} : Stop before you embarrass yourself even more. I know how the saying goes but seeing as YOU are the one who's an ass in this case I didn't feel the need to include the latter part of the saying.", ">>{Origamiface} : You know something's gone wrong when you need a fucking dongle to perform a basic function on a phone", ">>{aenigme} : And yet I've even had Android users say they wish they had a similar car-charging port. If you're car was manufactured post 2011 with a USB port, you don't even need that for the iPhone 7. I'm not crazy for it either, but as I said, they have different models available to choose from. Personally, I use the 5se because the others are too large for my taste. Apple isn't the first to do this and they won't be the last. More and more headphone manufacturers are moving to Bluetooth and detachable audio cables (pick your poison, e.g. 3.5mm, usb-c, lightning). If you're using in-ear headphones and complaining about Bluetooth audio quality, then that person is just being pedantic and obtuse. Apple haters cried about the floppy disk, then the compact disk, then legacy ports. And here we are now where no one bats an eye. You cannot please Apple haters. So why bother listening to their feedback?", ">>{aenigme} : > I really don't have a dog in this fight Virtually every Android/Microsoft consumer ever. *They still care and it shows.* > leg·a·cy > denoting software or hardware that has been superseded but is difficult to replace because of its wide use. It is exactly the same thing.", ">>{Origamiface} : I was talking about the dongle, not the car adapter. Removable cables have been around for a good while now for reasons having nothing to do with Apple's decisions. So the crucial difference about the removal of the floppy drive is that there was a vastly better technology already in place to replace it, the CD drive. There's that Elon Musk quote about how something can't just be a little bit better (which the lightning port can't even say it is (there are technical reasons why it's inferior to the 3.5mm)), it has to be a *lot* better if it's going to replace or carve out a space for itself among existing technologies. (He said it of cars but the same applies to tech) Trust me, if the lightning port/USBC audio was a better alternative, I would be all for it as a tech-geek. There is just not enough of a reason to get rid of the jack. Until something better comes along, I'll keep buying devices, even if they're slightly bigger, *with a fucking headphone jack*, and that don't need a fucking *dongle* to perform a simple function.", '>>{aenigme} : *Still thinks this shift stems from Apple.* *Refuses to read anything against his cognitive bias.* *Believes his definition of "better alternative" is the only definition.*', ">>{Origamiface} : *Thinks where this shift originated matters vs biggest practitioner* *Believes he knows what other people do and don't read* *Seems to lack basic understanding about the audio technologies in question* *Replies in smug fashion* What happened to your meme arrows, left 'em at 4chan?", '>>{caretodeal} : That is a biased video. In Android, there is hidden feature called "background process limit". You can access it thru "Developer options" in the Settings. The video maker has mischievously set the limit to 1 background process at a time. That\'s why his OnePlus reloads the apps each time. Even my 1 GB Android doesn\'t suck like that.', '>>{compounding} : Does [everyone](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73wKKzIbRiY&t=3m42s) use the same cheat against the one plus 3 even when comparing it against other Android smartphones? In fact, that video actually gives an explanation for the discrepancy which I didn’t know about. The phone uses extremely aggressive ram management even despite having 6 GB RAM to preserve battery life (they say). Whatever the reason, what good is the hardware if it is software limited to prevent it from being used? If I had to guess, I’d say that the company doesn’t think 6 GB is a good investment in actual performance of the device, but just wants to have a big number on the box for marketing purposes.', '>>{LiGuangMing1981} : Not to mention that Android makers have managed to do all of those things (bigger battery, image stabilization, stereo speakers) without removing the headphone jack.', ">>{Renive} : VR is the next big thing, while what you say is correct, they have worse software and most astonishing, lack of wireless charging. It's already standard, even my pc case has it (that's why I bought dark base).", ">>{Renive} : We hate on their phones because of their marketing and brand. You can't tell me you upgraded hardware (like everyone, every year) and cut one feature and call it a courage. Also, those movies with water splashing on iPhone like it's real deal now, because they don't have anything to show yet they have to because they're so awesome... Hardware is OK, but brand is cancer.", ">>{PM_ME_INDIE_HENTAI} : I use 3 at work and it gives a better experience for multi-monitor setups and during movies, I personally feel I'm getting a more cinematic experience. I don't think curved is worth the money though.", '>>{runner_3} : USB-C and 3.5mm should be the new standard for all tech. Hah! Imagine that.', '>>{runner_3} : Cannot reply in italics on mobile, tries anyway. Fails. Edit: referring to myself here.', '>>{EncryptedGenome} : I have zero sympathy for the headphone jack people. That obsolete technology should have never made the jump to cell phones in the first place.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{chrismola} : Spicer: President Trump Taking Message of Success Directly to America Around Inaccurate ‘Filter of the Mainstream Media’', '>>{Fatandmean} : F to the U to the C and the K Breitbart.', ">>{Ask10101} : State sponsored media. Don't click. Don't support.", '>>{zyme86} : Accomplish what? A record for court defeats in the first month?', '>>{Tridamos} : > "Trump lies directly to dum-dums with no one to point out the many ways in which he is wrong first"', '>>{TheMovingFinger} : > Message of Success Won’t need all 140 characters', ">>{as_a_black_guy} : This is like Arby's calling Wendy's mainstream fast food.", ">>{CarmineFields} : He's been told that his inaugral crowds circled Neptune.", '>>{idgitsinamerica} : Breitbart= state propaganda. Do not click, do not pass go. Straight to the toilet with it.', ">>{FewerMoonves} : Far be it from me to offer advice to Team Trump...but so long as there is a First Amendment, there will be an independent, multifaceted press. Some of which will, inevitably, be adversarial toward you. But declaring war on the 'mainstream' press as a whole is not a sound long-term strategy.", ">>{YouSnowNothingJon} : Between the Comey meeting, McCain's latest comments, and Trump's latest meltdown, I have to believe that something huge is about to be made public. What I fear most is, even if something does stick and ultimately leads to his demise, he has set such a dangerous precedent for future candidates that we'll never be able to fully recover from this. Someone far more intelligent and savy could come along in the near future and perfect his scary fucking tactics (and I'd like to think that people will have learned their lesson after all is said and done, but Trump's regressive, delusional base and their fervent support indicates otherwise.) I'm also terrified to see how those mouth-breathers are going to react when their orange, narcissistic man-child gets kicked out of TWH. Wouldn't be surprised if his followers try and usher in the end of times. It's going to lead to an extremist religious right the likes of which we never could have imagined.", ">>{picklejewce} : What's the over under on this administrative tire fire going completely up in flames?", '>>{muffler48} : Pence is going around talking like he is already President. He knows something too.', '>>{YouSnowNothingJon} : Most definitely. The more we see him breaking stride with Trump (NATO, Russia), the more apparent it becomes that something is in the pipeline.', '>>{125e125} : You guys have a lot of nerve trying to repeatedly submit this shit rag to r/politics. This might work on other subreddits but definitely not here. Give it the fuck up. Exercise in futility defined. All this does is give me more advertisement sponsors to contact so that I can further drain you down into bankruptcy.', '>>{xenopsych} : >The AP printed fake news this week, claiming inaccurately that the Trump administration was activating the National Guard to round up and remove illegal aliens. That is not true. Now we know why they are leaking these extreme drafts. Bannon wants to weaponize anything. He is getting desperate.', ">>{FewerMoonves} : You raise many good points. Pence may be in an unusually strong position to corral what has been traditionally understood as the 'religious right'--those voters concerned primarily with opposition to abortion and to a lesser extent gay rights--but it's an open question as to how numerous and powerful this group even is anymore. The Republican coalition that elected Donald Trump in 2016 is different in many ways than the Republican coalition that elected George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. George W played up the religious angle and took a more moderate position on immigration to attract evangelicals in the South and Midwest, as well as Hispanic voters in the West; Trump took a harder line on immigration, emphasized religion less, and took a very untraditional (by Republican standards) protectionist position on trade. As a result, Trump won 'Rust Belt' states which George W. Bush never did, while losing Western states to Hillary Clinton that Bush carried both times. In the event of Trump's resignation or impeachment and removal from office, it's hard to say whether Pence could maintain much of Trump's 'core' support. As a fairly traditional Republican, Pence shouldn't have much trouble hanging onto those Republican voters who 'fell in line' last November, regardless of how they felt about Trump individually. But whether it's Trump, Pence, or someone else as the Republican standard-bearer come 2020, I suspect that they will have a difficult time maintaining support in states he won narrowly in 2016 like Michigan and Pennsylvania, if a Republican administration can't deliver on Trump's promise to revitalize the American manufacturing industry in a big way. (Hard to see how anyone could, considering global economic trends). The more frightening variable, of course, is the nativist sentiment Trump successfully tapped into, which I suppose is never too far beneath the surface if a politician so flawed as Trump can stir it up in a big way. If Trump is ousted before the 2020 election, does he or some surrogate run as a 'spoiler' to spite the Republican 'establishment?' (Likely handing Democrats the White House in the process). Not implausible, considering Trump's famous vindictive streak.", ">>{vootator} : Trump taking his desperate need for attention to the shrinking minority of supporters in America who have yet to realize how deeply he's shafted them.", ">>{mrpickleby} : I know everyone defines success differently, but how does he define it? Because I don't think this is what most people would consider a 'successful' presidency. Just sayin'.", '>>{YouSnowNothingJon} : Thanks for your response. It was both enlightening and reassuring. I\'m just so worried about this visceral fear/hate that Trump has tapped into. These members of the Alt-Right have felt so "misunderstood" for so long and they now feel as though their anger has been validated. Trump gave them a voice, gave them hope. What happens when that voice is ripped away? I can\'t shake the feeling that, in the event that their savior is ousted, acts of domestic terrorism from white nationalists are going to multiply ten-fold....manifest destiny and whatnot.', '>>{Ninbyo} : A.k.a Steve "Rasputin" Bannon, former Breitbart CEO, is whispering in his ear about how America loves him and it\'s just the nasty media and liberals lying.', '>>{muffler48} : Look to his speech in Germany (i think yesterday). His position on NATO, Russia and US commitment appears to be more in line with normal than Trump and Bannon.'], ['>>{gabagool69} : How ESPN Went from America’s Sports Network to That Guy in the Bar Who Won’t Shut Up About Politics', ">>{getridofappleskitle} : being political is the new trend, i mean look at how MTV tried and failed at trying to become political with their MTV news youtube channel, it's one of the most ridiculous things i have ever watched.", ">>{HollywoodCote} : The problem is... sports and politics aren't mutually exclusive. Some would argue Muhammad Ali was the most iconic athlete in modern history, but you can't have a real discussion about the man without paying attention to his political stances. Similar could go with Jesse Owens, John Carlos, Tommie Smith, Kareem Abdul-Jabar, and Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf. Black and white thought may make you comfortable, but life is complicated.", '>>{Stuckinaloop} : I think ESPN was better when it was mainly Australian Rules Football and Finnish Ice Racing.', ">>{liesthroughhisteeth} : >Americans live in a time when it seems like politics has invaded every facet of our lives. It's just because there is an ever increasing across the board level of stupidity that is almost impossible not to talk about...even by us non-Americans.", ">>{cowboysfan88} : They could just show highlights, if i wanted political stuff I'd watch a channel that's supposed to be for that", ">>{dontbedenied} : That's how ESPN is in South America. Much better than the political BS you see in the USA.", ">>{treerat} : ESPN raises everybody's cable bill, while offering nothing.", '>>{TuLegit2quit} : The only time of the year that ESPN is useful is during college football due to the number of games they show. Even then I mute the TV to avoid all of the asinine commentary, plus Herbstreit hates my Dawgs.', '>>{one8sevenn} : This has given to the rise of other sports networks. http://www.forbes.com/sites/vincentfrank/2015/07/12/losing-millions-of-subscribers-espn-now-facing-tough-decisions/#7b6593724df4 ESPN is bleeding talent. They seem to not be able to get out of their own way.', '>>{tbx5} : LJR is some of the worst right wing gutter press garbage I have seen in a while. Site is truly for low IQ wastes of oxygen.'], [">>{Origamiface} : We've been asking the wrong question: tech columnist David Pogue claims removing the headphone jack is how Apple fit the 7's improved features.", '>>{justeducation} : With that logic, iPhone 8 will remove Lightning port for more new features. Then iPhone 9 remove SIM slot for more new features. The man who sold the world.', ">>{trusk89} : Ok, but on the other hand, it doesn't have stereo speakers, if you put it that way. And also, it's thicker. Apple doesn't do thicker phones, remember? Even though no one will have an issue with 1mm more for a couple of hours of more battery life.", ">>{trusk89} : > How is this even relevant to having no headphone jack? It's one of the reasons listed in the article for removing the jack. I was saying that it's not just the battery.", '>>{trusk89} : [The camera is on a gyro](https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+7+Plus+Teardown/67384)', '>>{Origamiface} : Apl: hey guys it took courage but we removed the CPU to make room for this U2 album and a bigger taptic engine. Edit: iPogue http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=hwlshw&s=9', '>>{Drunk_and_High} : And this guy is payed to say what he says.', '>>{JoeKkerr} : Umm, samsung and others did it with a button that presses down and still more water resistant than iphones...maybe they just needed a reason to charge', '>>{walrus_of_fate} : What fucking features? The Iphone 7 is still nearly a generation behind most popular android phones. Hell, most budget android phones have features that apple has thus far refused to adopt. The headphone jack was removed because Apple wants to sell more wireless pairs of Beats. It has nothing to do with features.', '>>{compounding} : Uh, what hardware features is the iPhone “a generation behind” in? The only thing I can imagine is screen (matters if you are doing VR I guess), and ram (where the iPhone actually holds more in memory than popular Android flagships, so the number itself is relatively meaningless). In contrast as an Android fan, I’m actually pretty annoyed that not one top Android phones has caught up to last generation’s iPhone with regards to some really critical (for me) areas where the iPhone excels: * CPU (Especially single thread performance which matters most for UI and most apps) * GPU (Especially when in use for long periods of gaming) * NVMe storage (which has a huge impact on cold load times) * Hardware (non-CPU) based FDE (no overhead penalty like when using the CPU for encryption) * Passcode hashing with hardware-only keys to prevent off-device passcode cracking (Qualcomm’s implementation is [totally broken](http://www.slashgear.com/android-soc-security-keys-extracted-qualcomm-trustzone-in-question-31442245/)) Its pretty hard to look at those key features where Apple is dominant and claim with a straight face that they are “nearly a generation behind” when that only applies to VR capacity and the headphone jack.', ">>{walrus_of_fate} : Processor isn't truly quad core. Less ram. No oled screen. No fast charging. It's less powerful and almost twice the price.", ">>{Filmiester} : Removing the sim wouldn't that be that bad of an idea actually. It's just a matter how to implement it", '>>{Lalzballzz} : The iPhone 7 is way way more powerful than any other phone on the market dude. Check literally any benchmark.', '>>{LatinGeek} : >Would you rather have a headphone jack, or the new features? The headphone jack. Or they could not settle, and make the thing taller or thicker to make room for those extra features.', '>>{bricolagefantasy} : At least they didn\'t try to claim that "dual camera" is their genius invention. Several other guys had it first. Apple still making phone with giant bazel like it\'s 2014. I am sure when they finally get a curved display, they will declare that as their genius invention. with courage.', ">>{bricolagefantasy} : Apple cannot make multiple asymetric cores, because it is patented to death. Same with their lame GPU. Apple's only hope is to make longer pipe (throw more transistors). It works for awhile since apple buyers are willing to pay premium. But as you notice battery is kinda shit.", '>>{compounding} : By asymmetric are you referring to Big.Little architectures? Because Apple just released [that exact configuration](http://in.pcmag.com/apple-iphone-7/107654/opinion/with-a10-fusion-has-apple-moved-to-biglittle) Regardless though, even without Big.Little they were already better in high performance and low power consumption (due to race to sleep benefits), so afaik their battery *efficiency* is awesome. Its so good in fact that they choose a smaller battery than competitors and still get similar battery life.', '>>{bricolagefantasy} : > low power consumption you got to be kidding. big.little is ancient tech. It was from 2-3 yrs ago. I am willing to bet A10 cannot do arbitrary cores. Heterogenous is the latest. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VkSHUpfsCQ', ">>{JectorDelan} : >Or they could not settle, and make the thing taller or thicker to make room for those extra features. Well, that's just crazy talk!", ">>{XenuWorldOrder} : Twice the price of what? It's cheaper than the Note 7.", '>>{Squircle_MFT} : >this 52-year-old technology requires a relatively huge box to receive the plug. Phone makers can’t stand that thing. It’s in the way of making the battery bigger. It’s in the way of putting in a better camera, or nicer speakers I love how the author thinks apple will actually improve any of that', ">>{noseshimself} : It doesn't burn that nicely and won't keep you warm at night so it hast to be cheaper than Samsung.", ">>{noseshimself} : > (where the iPhone actually holds more in memory than popular Android flagships, so the number itself is relatively meaningless). ? I have to consult my LeEco Le Max 2 which I picked up travelling through Guangzhou to hear what it thinks about your statement, but right now it is laughing hysterically. My Wife's One+ is chiming in.", '>>{compounding} : See videos like [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRO30ujYBfA). The iPhone with 2GB of ram had every app pre-loaded and ready to go in the background during the second “lap”, but the One^+ had to reload several apps (especially games, but also the browser) because it wasn’t keeping them open in the background even with 6 GB of ram on the spec sheet. I don’t know what accounts for the discrepancy, but the experience for the user is that the iPhone often performs better at managing ram and keeping apps open than phones with 2x or even 3x the amount. Ultimately, no matter what the “number” is, what matters is how it performs, so it seems reasonable to dismiss the ram discrepancy if it still performs better than phones that are “maxed out” on ram anyway.', '>>{Calimariae} : Surely there has to be a better way than using a physical card sent in the mail by your provider.', '>>{Calimariae} : I hope they never start using curved displays. What a gimmick that is.', '>>{Filmiester} : Especially since phone providers want to charge you $20 for one', ">>{Calimariae} : They're free where I'm from. The technology just feels dated to me. I would assume it'd be possible to just feed that data directly into the device instead of having it separated on a physical card.", ">>{Calimariae} : There's certainly nothing retro about it. I fail to see the benefits of having a curved screen of any sort.", '>>{wowseriffic} : It was a joke about early CRTs, which were curved because it made beam aiming easier.', ">>{Calimariae} : Ah yeah, I should've gotten that one (having grown up with CRTs and all). They were bent the other way though :p", ">>{lendergle} : *Would you rather have a headphone jack — and give up the things that Apple put in its place? Like a bigger battery that lasts 2 hours longer. And a camera stabilizer that eliminates blurry shots. And stereo speakers.* Yes. Yes, I would definitely rather have a headphone jack and give up those things. Two more hours on a battery isn't worth bothering for. We're all used to charging up whenever close to a power source. It's not even a minor inconvenience. A camera stabilizer might be helpful for someone with Parkinson's (which is a huge tragedy, and I'm sorry for anyone who does have it), but I can't remember the last time I took a blurry shot that didn't involve moving the phone more than an inch. Stabilize THAT if you can. And stereo speakers? LOL, whut? Why would anyone play something requiring stereo output on a phone? If you need stereo, you play it on a (and I'm stretching a bit, but...) *stereo* system. Or put in your earphones/earbuds. That you plug into a little jack on your phone. That doesn't have a bunch of useless features.", '>>{jmnugent} : The iPhone 7 does actually (in reality) have a bigger Battery, better cameras and nicer speakers.', ">>{accountnumberseven} : That's literally what CDMA is, it's SIMless in concept while GSM requires the use of SIM cards. It's also why a lot of people want to keep SIM cards: a physical card means that you can take it out and put it into another phone without your provider's input, and the GSM standard allows any SIM card that already works on the network to work with any phone that also supports GSM networks. With SIMless systems you need to actually ask your provider to port your plan between phones.", ">>{JPN2214} : Honestly the SIM slot could and should be replaced by a software emulator. And I'd be pretty stoked about a completely wireless phone.", ">>{JPN2214} : Just as an opposing opinion, I'm honestly on the other side. The 3.5 jack isn't that useful for me. Cameras are.", '>>{Fa6ade} : They have already done this on the iPad. It has an internal Apple sim on the 3G versions that just lets you choose your carrier.', ">>{Fa6ade} : A lot of people record videos while moving. It's also useful for low light photos where the exposure time is longer.", ">>{mariestellamaris} : It's useless. Except for the hardware the iPhone hasn't really improved for years. The 2007 iPhone was squares on a screen, the 2016 iPhone is still squares on a screen. I don't really give a shit if it's a second faster than other phones as long as it doesn't do what similar phones have been doing for years.", ">>{Fatfaggottreat1} : Too bad they couldn't design a battery that doesn't explode and a stylus that doesn't insert backwards.", ">>{Arve} : The 3.5mm jack has a very odd shape (it will protrude 15-17 mm, possibly more with water sealing, and pretty much dictates the entire layout of the bottom fourth of the phone - the Lighting port, even in its new and slightly beefier form due to the water protection doesn't take up all that much space. How else do you imagine that the 7's battery grew by 14%? > Then iPhone 9 remove SIM slot for more new features. The SIM slot is probably on its way out, being replaced by embedded or soft SIM. [Here's more](http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/16/apple_samsung_sim_talks/). That's one thing you're not gonna miss once the transition has taken place, but you're going to shy away from any telecom operator that refuses to port you over to a new operator, and/or you're going to demand legislation to fix predatory operator practices. Once those bumps are over and done with, you aren't going to miss it, at all.", ">>{Arve} : > Umm, samsung and others did it with a button that presses down and still more water resistant than iphones Well, Samsung may have opted to slap IP68 on it, but real-world tests of the iPhone 7 shows that it's vastly outperforming its certified rating. Some relevant tests: * [iPhone 7 vs Galaxy S7 deep water test](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K05cTPeFfyM) * [Boiling an iPhone for 7 minutes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkG4-EgFOM8) It survived both of those, it survived iFixit keeping it submerged for hours, it survived being dunked in Cola and frozen. It's fair to say that when Apple said IP67, they were _very_ conservative.", ">>{Arve} : > A camera stabilizer might be helpful for someone with Parkinson's (which is a huge tragedy, and I'm sorry for anyone who does have it), but I can't remember the last time I took a blurry shot that didn't involve moving the phone more than an inch. Stabilize THAT if you can. Optical image stabilization isn't there to help people with Parkinson's, it's to provide much better hand-held low-light performance, because you can keep the shutter open for much longer during a night-time exposure. Camera vendors like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Leica, Fuji and others put these features on a lens because it improves the situation and usability of a camera under all circumstances, not just for a very select minority of people wielding a camera.", '>>{Lalzballzz} : That doesn\'t make any sense. A new phone is ONLY hardware. You could update the software without getting a new phone. When Apple includes android features they are "copying". When they don\'t they are "behind". When they have features android phones don\'t those features don\'t matter or are "gimmicks". When people (mistakenly) think the iPhone is weaker than android phones it\'s a huge deal. When they find out that the iPhone is about a year ahead of their competition in SoC and that their storage blows any android phone out of the water then it\'s "speed doesn\'t matter". Android phones are great but the constant moving of the goalposts by people who just can\'t see the good points about iPhones is tiresome. The variety is nice in the industry. Apple offers something different that a lot of people like and a lot of people don\'t. Don\'t see why people go so far towards one thing or another.', ">>{mariestellamaris} : Can you please show me a quote where I said anything about Android? Also, iPhone's hardwares have changed, but inside it's still the same old phone in 2016. Rows of squares, that's it. You can't really do anything with it, it's a severely limited phone.", '>>{omega2346} : My stylus won go in backwards, and who the fuck puts a stylus in backwards?', ">>{Fatfaggottreat1} : It's not hard to design a stylus that can't insert in backwards. Samsung doesn't really pay attention to the details, or test their phones properly.", ">>{omega2346} : Didn't I just say mine doesn't go in backwards. Because mine doesn't go in backwards. I can not get my S pen to insert backwards.", ">>{Corbs117} : Everyone is going to speculate, but I'll never buy it unless Apple announces it. In an era where everything is getting smaller and smaller while also getting bigger at the same time, I'll avoid the rumor.", '>>{base_chank1942} : Go ahead and bet, you will lose. The fusion architecture is exactly apples take on this type of architecture', '>>{aenigme} : Then buy the iPhone 6/6s...problem solved. [Or buy one of these](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01LYHVQB9/) [Or buy one of these](http://www.scosche.com/iphone-7-car-charger)', '>>{aenigme} : And better display, despite what those who only count pixels may say.', '>>{aenigme} : > No oled screen. OLED is not the holy grail. http://displaymate.com/iPhone7_ShootOut_1.htm', '>>{aenigme} : > Can you please show me a quote where I said anything about Android? Of course, we all knew you were referring to a Windows Phone or Nokia. Am I right? /s', ">>{MassiveFire} : Stupid engineers. Sacrificing some battery life is negliable, but using bluetooth for the earpods. They do realize that bluetooth eats up a lot more power than your typical DAC 3.5mm jack output. Oh, and how about making the phone bigger packing more battery and computing power, instead of making it so thin that it actually bends when sit on. And did they consider that using bluetooth also interferes with wifi? Yeah, those 2.4 and 2.5 ghz bands are completely fucked because of the iphone 7. And how about that front facing speakers? Oh, and if one of those earpods falls out while you're on the road, then good luck getting them back.", ">>{mariestellamaris} : There's a common saying that you make an ass of yourself when you assume things. You just made an ass of yourself. I own a Lumia as a second phone and it's definitely more useful than any iPhone. So don't be an idiot putting words into people's mouth.", ">>{aenigme} : *Can you please show me a quote where I said anything about you owning an Android? Please, don't be an idiot putting words into people's mouth.* And BTW...that's not how that saying goes.", ">>{mariestellamaris} : Stop before you embarrass yourself even more. I know how the saying goes but seeing as YOU are the one who's an ass in this case I didn't feel the need to include the latter part of the saying.", ">>{Origamiface} : You know something's gone wrong when you need a fucking dongle to perform a basic function on a phone", ">>{aenigme} : And yet I've even had Android users say they wish they had a similar car-charging port. If you're car was manufactured post 2011 with a USB port, you don't even need that for the iPhone 7. I'm not crazy for it either, but as I said, they have different models available to choose from. Personally, I use the 5se because the others are too large for my taste. Apple isn't the first to do this and they won't be the last. More and more headphone manufacturers are moving to Bluetooth and detachable audio cables (pick your poison, e.g. 3.5mm, usb-c, lightning). If you're using in-ear headphones and complaining about Bluetooth audio quality, then that person is just being pedantic and obtuse. Apple haters cried about the floppy disk, then the compact disk, then legacy ports. And here we are now where no one bats an eye. You cannot please Apple haters. So why bother listening to their feedback?", ">>{aenigme} : > I really don't have a dog in this fight Virtually every Android/Microsoft consumer ever. *They still care and it shows.* > leg·a·cy > denoting software or hardware that has been superseded but is difficult to replace because of its wide use. It is exactly the same thing.", ">>{Origamiface} : I was talking about the dongle, not the car adapter. Removable cables have been around for a good while now for reasons having nothing to do with Apple's decisions. So the crucial difference about the removal of the floppy drive is that there was a vastly better technology already in place to replace it, the CD drive. There's that Elon Musk quote about how something can't just be a little bit better (which the lightning port can't even say it is (there are technical reasons why it's inferior to the 3.5mm)), it has to be a *lot* better if it's going to replace or carve out a space for itself among existing technologies. (He said it of cars but the same applies to tech) Trust me, if the lightning port/USBC audio was a better alternative, I would be all for it as a tech-geek. There is just not enough of a reason to get rid of the jack. Until something better comes along, I'll keep buying devices, even if they're slightly bigger, *with a fucking headphone jack*, and that don't need a fucking *dongle* to perform a simple function.", '>>{aenigme} : *Still thinks this shift stems from Apple.* *Refuses to read anything against his cognitive bias.* *Believes his definition of "better alternative" is the only definition.*', ">>{Origamiface} : *Thinks where this shift originated matters vs biggest practitioner* *Believes he knows what other people do and don't read* *Seems to lack basic understanding about the audio technologies in question* *Replies in smug fashion* What happened to your meme arrows, left 'em at 4chan?", '>>{caretodeal} : That is a biased video. In Android, there is hidden feature called "background process limit". You can access it thru "Developer options" in the Settings. The video maker has mischievously set the limit to 1 background process at a time. That\'s why his OnePlus reloads the apps each time. Even my 1 GB Android doesn\'t suck like that.', '>>{compounding} : Does [everyone](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73wKKzIbRiY&t=3m42s) use the same cheat against the one plus 3 even when comparing it against other Android smartphones? In fact, that video actually gives an explanation for the discrepancy which I didn’t know about. The phone uses extremely aggressive ram management even despite having 6 GB RAM to preserve battery life (they say). Whatever the reason, what good is the hardware if it is software limited to prevent it from being used? If I had to guess, I’d say that the company doesn’t think 6 GB is a good investment in actual performance of the device, but just wants to have a big number on the box for marketing purposes.', '>>{LiGuangMing1981} : Not to mention that Android makers have managed to do all of those things (bigger battery, image stabilization, stereo speakers) without removing the headphone jack.', ">>{Renive} : VR is the next big thing, while what you say is correct, they have worse software and most astonishing, lack of wireless charging. It's already standard, even my pc case has it (that's why I bought dark base).", ">>{Renive} : We hate on their phones because of their marketing and brand. You can't tell me you upgraded hardware (like everyone, every year) and cut one feature and call it a courage. Also, those movies with water splashing on iPhone like it's real deal now, because they don't have anything to show yet they have to because they're so awesome... Hardware is OK, but brand is cancer.", ">>{PM_ME_INDIE_HENTAI} : I use 3 at work and it gives a better experience for multi-monitor setups and during movies, I personally feel I'm getting a more cinematic experience. I don't think curved is worth the money though.", '>>{runner_3} : USB-C and 3.5mm should be the new standard for all tech. Hah! Imagine that.', '>>{runner_3} : Cannot reply in italics on mobile, tries anyway. Fails. Edit: referring to myself here.', '>>{EncryptedGenome} : I have zero sympathy for the headphone jack people. That obsolete technology should have never made the jump to cell phones in the first place.'], [">>{stanxv} : Trump 'Thrilled' to Nominate Ben Carson as Housing, Urban Development Secretary", '>>{TyrionLan1ster} : I thought I just woke up. Am I still dreaming?', '>>{N8theGr8} : Why Ben Carson? I would have figured Trump would have picked the "these housing prices are too damn high" guy from the ever popular meme.', '>>{Riadyt} : Can I become a brain surgeon without any knowledge in that regard?', ">>{GavinGT} : Because he's black and...that's the only reason really.", ">>{Rhantoric} : Based on Ben Carson's extensive qualifications and pertinent knowledge, no doubt. /s On a semi-related note, I wish there was a better way to denote sarcasm. I nominate backwards slanting italics. Someone please tell Trump that a liberal said it was a bad idea.", '>>{ihavesexwith} : HUD = Urban. Urban = Black people. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/10/trump-african-american-inner-city/503744/', ">>{ihavesexwith} : I've honestly never needed an /s. It's almost always clear from the writing style who a Trump supporter is and who a liberal is.", ">>{Ximitar} : Not necessarily. One could quote Trump all day and make the case that he's a blithering idiot, or one could quote Trump all day and insist that he is America's Messiah: the same quotes could be used to bolster either argument. Trumpism is in the eye of the beholder.", ">>{ihavesexwith} : Please, give me the Trump quotes that you believe makes him seem like America's Messiah. I just have to know.", ">>{hillarysidiot} : Wow, really? So a real estate guy doesn't know anyone else that could be more qualified for **Housing and Urban Development**? Is this serious?", ">>{Ximitar} : There are none. I think he's a blithering idiot. My point was that the statements which make me think he's got some sort of neurological impairment will make other people think he's a gift from the gods. Same way some people love getting fucked in the ass; I get that they like it, but it's just not something that I think will ever appeal to me.", '>>{Ximitar} : He thought it was "Urban Secretary of Housing Development" and limited his search to His Blacks^^TM.', ">>{hillarysidiot} : Is there really no one around him that said 'maybe we should think about this'?", ">>{Ximitar} : Quietly, to themselves perhaps. I don't think The God Emperor likes people saying stuff like that to his face. To do so would be a vicious attack, after all, and he needs his safe space. It's unpatriotic to disagree with the President Elect.", ">>{rstcp} : You don't know for sure until you've tried it. I hear it's quite nice", ">>{rstcp} : I think he genuinely has a problem filling the lower level cabinet positions. It's not a very high prestige job, and Trump is incredibly toxic to most actually qualified candidates. Who would risk the rest of their career and their social life for a position like that in a Trump administration?", ">>{ChrisFromLongIsland} : It's nice to know how Trump looked at all of the issues surrounding housing and the mortgage market in the US and hired the best person he could find. Someone who probably does not know what HUD stands for. I want this to be the first question asked in the press conference. HUD only has 8500 employees and a 46 billion dollar budget. You know what they say housing is not brain surgery.", ">>{achmedclaus} : What in the hell is a pothead brain surgeon going to know about housing and Urban development? It's because he's black isn't it?", ">>{anonymous_4_custody} : As long as Carson doesn't end up in a room alone with him. Knowing Trump, he'll hit on his secretary the moment they're alone."]]

classify and reply

['>>{rokstar66} : California Rep. Adam Schiff becomes leading voice of opposition', '>>{dobroman2} : He is certainly more presidential than trump. Schiff in 2020?', '>>{Die-Bold} : Schiff is certainly setting a standard that should be emulated by other Democrats in relation to the Russian infiltration of our government.', '>>{rokstar66} : The article mentions him as a potential replacement for Diane Feinstein, which could be good as well.', '>>{sezit} : Poised, measured, learned, ethical, well spoken, intelligent, cooperative and bipartisan... and deeply patriotic. Whats not to like? (Oh, unless none of that stuff matters, and you only care about being a ~~loyal~~ lickspittle Republican)', ">>{dobroman2} : Right now, I'm liking Schiff and Al Franken.", '>>{Kvetch__22} : Oo, a Franken/Schiff ticket would be a good idea.', '>>{djphan} : schiff should be AG if he manages to take down donald...', '>>{headee} : I thought I was the only lady crushing big time on Adam Schiff.', ">>{frog-in-a-blender} : Nope. Me too. Every time I watch him speak, I crush a little harder. He's adorable.", '>>{deathtotheemperor} : Watching him run circles around Nunes has been entertaining.', '>>{Ninbyo} : I know you were going for a joke, but Stein can go suck a lemon.', ">>{crankywithakeyboard} : My only regret is that I'm too old to have his baby.", ">>{Esperantwo} : The Wayne/Garth to Obama and Biden's Bill and Ted.", '>>{throwaway_ghast} : Schiff, Sanders, Warren, Franken, those are the kind of people with the moxie we need to lead this party.', ">>{fauxkaren} : Yeah, the California Dem party is voting on new leadership in the spring and I think they're going to start looking at potential candidates to run for Feinstein's seat. Schiff could be a contender, for sure.", '>>{meekrobe} : Schiff is my district. Even Republicans vote for him.', '>>{malignantbacon} : Think beyond the party... that kind of leadership should be baseline for all of our elected representatives.', '>>{exzackt} : So the exact opposite of the russian orange clown?', ">>{Kerfluffle-Bunny} : Not alone! He's my #1 politician crush right now. Really liking Kennedy as well. But he's got it in his blood.", ">>{IdiditonReddit} : He couldn't be any of those things and be a Republican in this day and age. Republicans have lost any little shred of credibility they had after this obstructionist bullshit they've been pulling.", ">>{buzzkillington99} : He's far more credible than Bernie, Schumer, Warren, Pelosi, Perez or any of those other jokers.", ">>{frog-in-a-blender} : I'll bet ol' Adam never expected to have himself a herd of groupies. ;)", '>>{indigowarrior} : Me too! Sign me up for a Schiff/Swalwell sandwich. Mm :)', ">>{sezit} : yes, I've seen it in my family. Conservatives used to have an ethical core. Now they are just mean.", '>>{Pyratefish} : My favorite Jon Stewart line was in 2008. "Do you remember when elite meant good?"', '>>{TheCoronersGambit} : Completely irrelevant, but I really like the photo used.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{rokstar66} : California Rep. Adam Schiff becomes leading voice of opposition', '>>{dobroman2} : He is certainly more presidential than trump. Schiff in 2020?', '>>{Die-Bold} : Schiff is certainly setting a standard that should be emulated by other Democrats in relation to the Russian infiltration of our government.', '>>{rokstar66} : The article mentions him as a potential replacement for Diane Feinstein, which could be good as well.', '>>{sezit} : Poised, measured, learned, ethical, well spoken, intelligent, cooperative and bipartisan... and deeply patriotic. Whats not to like? (Oh, unless none of that stuff matters, and you only care about being a ~~loyal~~ lickspittle Republican)', ">>{dobroman2} : Right now, I'm liking Schiff and Al Franken.", '>>{Kvetch__22} : Oo, a Franken/Schiff ticket would be a good idea.', '>>{djphan} : schiff should be AG if he manages to take down donald...', '>>{headee} : I thought I was the only lady crushing big time on Adam Schiff.', ">>{frog-in-a-blender} : Nope. Me too. Every time I watch him speak, I crush a little harder. He's adorable.", '>>{deathtotheemperor} : Watching him run circles around Nunes has been entertaining.', '>>{Ninbyo} : I know you were going for a joke, but Stein can go suck a lemon.', ">>{crankywithakeyboard} : My only regret is that I'm too old to have his baby.", ">>{Esperantwo} : The Wayne/Garth to Obama and Biden's Bill and Ted.", '>>{throwaway_ghast} : Schiff, Sanders, Warren, Franken, those are the kind of people with the moxie we need to lead this party.', ">>{fauxkaren} : Yeah, the California Dem party is voting on new leadership in the spring and I think they're going to start looking at potential candidates to run for Feinstein's seat. Schiff could be a contender, for sure.", '>>{meekrobe} : Schiff is my district. Even Republicans vote for him.', '>>{malignantbacon} : Think beyond the party... that kind of leadership should be baseline for all of our elected representatives.', '>>{exzackt} : So the exact opposite of the russian orange clown?', ">>{Kerfluffle-Bunny} : Not alone! He's my #1 politician crush right now. Really liking Kennedy as well. But he's got it in his blood.", ">>{IdiditonReddit} : He couldn't be any of those things and be a Republican in this day and age. Republicans have lost any little shred of credibility they had after this obstructionist bullshit they've been pulling.", ">>{buzzkillington99} : He's far more credible than Bernie, Schumer, Warren, Pelosi, Perez or any of those other jokers.", ">>{frog-in-a-blender} : I'll bet ol' Adam never expected to have himself a herd of groupies. ;)", '>>{indigowarrior} : Me too! Sign me up for a Schiff/Swalwell sandwich. Mm :)', ">>{sezit} : yes, I've seen it in my family. Conservatives used to have an ethical core. Now they are just mean.", '>>{Pyratefish} : My favorite Jon Stewart line was in 2008. "Do you remember when elite meant good?"', '>>{TheCoronersGambit} : Completely irrelevant, but I really like the photo used.']]

classify and reply

[">>{r4816} : GOP think tank: Trump's plans would just run up debt", ">>{YuYuHunter} : Sanders: Clinton needs to 'get away from all of this personality stuff' with Trump", ">>{Majnum} : What does Trump mean when he says he will deport 'criminal' immigrants first?", '>>{mwsomerset} : He means the same thing Obama is currently doing, deporting those illegal immigrants who committed crimes first.', ">>{OctoberxxxSurprise} : Not the same as Obama, who doesn't deport illegal aliens from sanctuary cities. Trump will deport all known illegal alien criminals, first. Duh.", ">>{conanthecnidarian} : He couldn't even get any points ahead of Hillary.", ">>{ozabelle} : well duh. but then it is amazing they'd admit it. if it was jub! they wouldn't. they'd be scared.", '>>{apollo151} : ...duh? By reducing tax revenue for the government and then immediately turning around and demanding a massive infrastructure plan that surpasses the freaking Great Wall of China in terms of scale?', ">>{greenissexy} : Clinton's plans to massively increase the tax rate is good for the people. Good for the people.", '>>{greenlife4} : The. Riminala arsenthe people that need our love th mostie.', ">>{megablahblah} : If an illegal alien commits a crime, but lives in Los Angeles, Obama won't deport them?", ">>{tenclubber} : His plans would also run up women's skirts as well.", '>>{DefinitelyIngenuous} : He definitely would have taken a different tact than HRC did.', '>>{ImNotARobotNo5} : [LMAO! We have a debt based currency, thank you democrats, that depends on constantly growing the debt to work!]( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0)', '>>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : The sad truth is that, if Bernie was the Democratic nominee, the media would still probably only cover him at about a quarter of the level they cover Trump.', '>>{alexanderwales} : I looked this up, because I was curious. [This was the closest I could find.](http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/obama-immigration-sanctuary-cities-219754)', ">>{megablahblah} : Wow, these cities sound crazy. I don't see why they would take it to that degree.", ">>{nit-picky} : So Trump will use the power of the Federal Government to override the laws of cities and states? I never thought I'd hear Republicans wanting to see the Federal Government become more powerful, at the expense of local government.", ">>{conanthecnidarian} : No, because the voters picked her over him. That's sort of how elections work.", ">>{alexanderwales} : [The Daily Beast has a good article](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/03/exploding-the-myth-of-sanctuary-cities.html) on sanctuary cities you might find interesting, since it's sort of a primer.", '>>{JoeSchadsSource} : Yeah but people sent some mean e-mails so that means it was rigged!', ">>{TygerPanzy} : I've never found [Heather Long](http://money.cnn.com/author/heather-long/index.html)'s commentary very compelling. I'm never really sure what message she's trying to convey.", ">>{Hill_Dawg_2016} : Think of the collusion! Why won't anyone think of the collusion!!", '>>{megablahblah} : First he says sanctuary cities are a myth, then says this: > Some ordinances might bar local officers from cooperating with immigration agents at traffic stops. Others might bar federal authorities from ascertaining the immigration status of those booked. Others might prohibit the release to federal officials of any suspect who could be an illegal immigrant. The issue of sanctuary cities surfaces whenever an illegal immigrant commits a horrendous crime in a place with ordinances like these on the books. I live in L.A. and this sounds crazy. Looking the other way when you have an illegal parent or grandparent taking care of a child born here is one thing ... going out of your way to prevent ICE from deporting criminals is insane.', '>>{Ins_Weltall} : In a completely fair and unbiased primary! /s', '>>{OctoberxxxSurprise} : He will move to deport all illegal aliens with a criminal history, yes. I am all for that.', ">>{TW3_ModSquad} : This election is starting to show a disturbing resemblance to 2000. Everyone mocked Bush as this stupid Texan who said ridiculous things. We painted him as a low-brow fratboy born with a silver spoon up his ass. Democrats were smug, assured their low-energy establishment pick would waltz into office. And then we lost. We didn't know how high the stakes were.", '>>{Rocksbury} : Obama doubled the debt. Using Clintons defense of Barrack Trump will have simply inherited a broken mess.', ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : How dare you! It's so obvious that the election was rigged! Just look at this [tell-all email](https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/19663)! How anyone can say that the election wasn't rigs escapes me.", '>>{toolish22} : Who knows what happens if it was a level playing field. Remember Debbie "6 debates is enough" Schultz? What ever happened to her just wondering?', '>>{1000000students} : Thank you and in addition they would dredge up stuff that didnt exist', '>>{apollo151} : You going to ignore that the United States has had 18 Republican presidents, 11 of which have been over the past 100 years?', ">>{LeftousCrusader} : It's much worse than 2000 because the backlash is spreading down the ballot.", ">>{Busybyeski} : How did the DNC learn nothing in that time??? They could be to blame for a presidency worse than W's.", '>>{VROF} : The debt is going to continue to go up as long as we keep cutting taxes and having a $5 trillion war. We have to pay for things somehow.', ">>{thegoodbadandsmoggy} : I believe it actually has its roots in the great Galician Thumb Wars of 134AD It was a long, pointy weapon you would push in to your enemies. Shortened from 'Attack', this effective and deadly weapon became known as a tack.", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I agree. She should focus on stuff like the deficit his tax plan would create or how the tariffs would affect the economy.', '>>{VROF} : The Iraq and Afghanistan wars have cost $5 trillion with no end in sight. And during that time we have continued to cut taxes. How are we expecting to pay for it?', ">>{UrukHaiGuyz} : It's kind of like a more extreme version. Trump is way more outrageous than the worst of W's verbal bumbling, and Clinton, while similarly bland to Gore, has a host of skeletons in her closet that he didn't.", ">>{greenissexy} : She just said the increased spending doesn't add a penny to the debt.", '>>{FricasseeingRabbit} : democrats have a proud history of underestimating the competition.', '>>{Martholomule} : Fun fact, those gifted with the weapon would quickly rise through the Galican ranks - sometimes all the way up to leadership positions, based on skill with the tack alone. This came to be known as the "rule of thumb".', ">>{VROF} : Well it wouldn't if it is offset by tax increases.", ">>{P0NYP0UNDER} : And he'd still be wrecking Trump by a huge margin. Because people genuinely like Bernie even if they don't agree with his politics.", '>>{apollo151} : And Bush right before him added about $8 trillion himself. Do some basic economics research.', ">>{dustoff122} : the thing that's really scary is that this has been every presidential election since the expansion of media. It becomes less about policies and more about personality. How George Bush could have possibly gotten a second term is unimaginable but when you think of how the average person pays attention to politics, then you realize the higher character always gets the most exposure and has an easier chance to win the people over. We were lucky to have a competent president in Obama who also had a great personality, but this election its looking bleak. If we just look at all the terrible things Donald Trump has said and how quickly he rose through the polls just after 1 week of Clintons health scare, then you start to realize that people really aren't paying attention anymore. People are watching this election like its a TV show and this is Trump's natural habitat, where everyone can dissect his character but as long as he's on tv then he has time to win people over.", ">>{thegoodbadandsmoggy} : Of course it wasn't easy to ascend the ranks of this noble warrior class. Many green thumbs were lost. Historians have consider this period of social development to be quite the nail-biter.", '>>{UrukHaiGuyz} : Ah! A very good point. While you are of course correct, what\'s less well known about the Galician Thumb Wars of 134AD is that the phrase "take a different tack" originated in response to the spear-like (or "tack like") formations used by Galician trireme captains, whose lead ship boasted a fearsome pointed ram. Thus to "take a different tack" means to dodge the initial ship and take the hit from a weaker ship. Thanks for promoting and expounding on these important matters of historical record.', ">>{LukeforBernie} : Exactly. Whether you like Bernie or not, you know he isn't bullshitting you. You'll know exactly what he'll try to do in office. With Clinton, you have no idea because she's a kite in the wind with her positions", ">>{LukeforBernie} : I've been saying this for many months now. If Clinton tries to beat Trump at his own game, she *will* lose", ">>{executivemonkey} : WRONG. We're going to declare bankruptcy, folks. It's the easiest thing. I've done it a half dozen times, easiest thing in the world. We won't even have to pay our contractors.", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : Clinton needs to get away from TPP. That's what Clinton needs.", ">>{BeowulfShaeffer} : Trump is right about one thing - if we can grow the economy faster than the debt then the debt-to-GDP ratio shrinks without austerity. However, I don't believe for a second Trump would manage that.", ">>{bboyjkang} : >Wallace: Mr. Trump, even conservative economists who have looked at your plan say that the numbers don't add up, that your idea, and you've talked about 25 million jobs created, 4%. >Wallace: Growth is unrealistic. >And they say you talk a lot about growing the energy industry. >They say with oil prices as they are right now, that's unrealistic as well.\xa0 http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/10/19/13336894/third-presidential-debate-live-transcript-clinton-trump", '>>{lcarlson6082} : She and Tim Kaine have already made it clear that they supported earlier versions, the changes made recently are unacceptable.', '>>{annoyingstranger} : That\'s all they have to disagree about, though. Trump\'s going to do what Generic_Republican_Bot would do, but he\'ll keep the rhetoric nice and inflammatory. If they were to have an argument on substance, it would be a series of, "Yeah, but that\'s not important because..." "Well, obviously, but that\'s not important because..."', ">>{PresOrangeBuffoon} : No. he doesn't plan. He just grabs it.", ">>{ImNotARobotNo5} : Is that you trying to excuse the keeping of our corrupt currency system as it's described in the video?", '>>{NikoKun} : I know.. how sad is that. They had a guy who could have easily wiped the floor with the opponent, and who by most post-analysis should have won the primary, but instead the DNC choose to rig it all against him, and risk Trump to protect their establishment.', ">>{apollo151} : No I'm stating that you and your YouTube video from a crackpot ignores that the bulk of the issues stem from decisions made by Republicans. Good luck losing in this election. Hopefully the shock and surprise that an unprepared jackass loses to a career politician doesn't kill you.", ">>{ImNotARobotNo5} : > No I'm stating that you and your YouTube video from a crackpot ignores that the bulk of the issues stem from decisions made by Republicans. What issues are those when in fact the root problem is a corrupt debt based currency the democrats gave us? For example, our debt based currency cuts the dollar in half in 35 years at just 2% inflation. Which I am sure you like that inflation. So how is it you think it's a republican problem when you probably want to keep our corrupt currency?", '>>{apollo151} : What evidentiary support do you have for a claim which completely disregards the BIpartisan aspect of the BIpartisan democracy. And by evidentiary support, I mean not a YouTube video and actual backing from reputable sources with knowledge in finances, economics, political science, law, and history.', ">>{fsm_the_alfredo} : > she's a kite in the wind with her positions Which positions?", '>>{Madomb01} : I am from Kentucky and this is how Matt Bevins got elected. Conway pretty much ran the campaign of "I\'m not Bevins" and it failed. There was only a 30% turnout to the polls and Bevin walked away with almost every county. Every conversation was "he\'s not Bevin". They couldn\'t tell me any policies or even his name half the time. This is how they lost KY and this is how they will lose the election.', '>>{ImNotARobotNo5} : Somehow I knew you were feigning disgust with the republicans. You are part of the problem.', ">>{apollo151} : Oh I have no issue with Republicans. It's the GOP leadership and Trump and people like yourself that bitch and bitch, yet never have any sort of actual evidence for your claims. I literally just asked you for proof and you turned it around to insult me. You completely bypassed my request for you to actually backup your statements with the most basic level of evidentiary support. Your type is the problem because you make baseless claims with no grounding in reality and then you scare people until they are frightened enough to believe any moronically garbage statement that you spew out of that anus you call a mouth.", ">>{SikhAndDestroy} : I'm not sure if you guys are just making shit up but I'm going to quote you at a party regardless of the accuracy.", '>>{ImNotARobotNo5} : > yet never have any sort of actual evidence for your claims. >I literally just asked you for proof and you turned it around to insult me. What would you like explained to you?', ">>{Stuwi} : It's Congress that has the power of purse, not the President.", '>>{jsmooth7} : Based on what? Bernie is popular right now because no one is attacking him. If he won the primaries, the Republicans would have attacked him non-stop.', '>>{apollo151} : Your statement that Democrats are solely to blame for a currency that was developed by a bipartisan government.', '>>{ImNotARobotNo5} : It was the democrats doing in giving us the federal reserve. Also, just because the republicans may have gone along with it does not make it a good idea. Your stance makes it look like you agree with the corruption.', ">>{apollo151} : Issue 1: The idea of a central bank run by the government had been an idea since the Founding Fathers. Meaning that the idea of a central federal bank in this country is LITERALLY older than the United States itself. And the Federal Reserve came into existence because the Republicans were too busy fighting amongst themselves in 1913 to actually beat Woodrow Wilson in an election. So congratulations, you can blame your own party's historical ineptitude when it comes to actually agreeing on anything for the current existence of the Federal Reserve. Issue 2: You did not state any facts or provide actual evidence to back up your claims. Again. And then you immediately somehow jumped to the conclusion that I agree with corruption in order to somehow discredit me when I am asking YOU to PROVE that your statements are correct. Which is blatantly pathetic and does nothing besides make you seem like an uneducated half-wit. I.E. Just like your presidential candidate. Boom, mic drop.", ">>{MammalMolester} : Clinton's policy is also pretty much identical to what Bush's presidential policies ended up being.", ">>{ImNotARobotNo5} : > Issue 1: The idea of a central bank run by the government had been an idea since the Founding Fathers. Meaning that the idea of a central federal bank in this country is LITERALLY older than the United States itself. And the Federal Reserve came into existence because the Republicans were too busy fighting amongst themselves in 1913 to actually beat Woodrow Wilson in an election. So congratulations, you can blame your own party's historical ineptitude when it comes to actually agreeing on anything for the current existence of the Federal Reserve. I blame the corrupt democrats that put forward a private central bank that makes bankers rich from it's new debt based currency. Notice how I included the paper fiat, debt based currency, and you did not. > > > > Issue 2: You did not state any facts or provide actual evidence to back up your claims. Where is your voting record, who put it forth, and who signed it into law proving it was not the democrats? >And then you immediately somehow jumped to the conclusion that I agree with corruption You are not agreeing that our debt based currency system to bankers is corrupt. >in order to somehow discredit me when I am asking YOU to PROVE that your statements are correct. Which is blatantly pathetic and does nothing besides make you seem like an uneducated half-wit. I.E. Just like your presidential candidate. > > > > Boom, mic drop. You also try to change the subject so you dont have to be pinned down on whether or not our currency system is corrupt. I wont hold my breath.", '>>{TrippleTonyHawk} : which changes do they object to that were made after their support? Tim Kaine supported the TPP until he became the VP pick.', '>>{MammalMolester} : You underestimate just how politically stratified America is in 2016. This race would e 50/50 regardless of who the nominees are, especially after feeling betrayed by two terms of Obama who was supposed to be a liberator but ended up warhawking with Russia and the Middle East and selling out the middle class', ">>{trimeta} : When she talks about policy, the media (and by extension, the public) doesn't care. They'd rather report on personal attacks, so she's just playing to the crowd. Of course, Trump is a master of personal attacks, so this still could be a losing strategy.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : On a serious note, if you really do think the election was rigged, then I got a 'tiny suggestion' for ya.", ">>{MiltOnTilt} : You know how I know you're not serious about the issues?", '>>{antisocially_awkward} : Except for her position on medicare, medicaid, healthcare in general, voting rights, environmentalism, gun rights, taxes, welfare, schools and childcare in general, lbgt rights, immigration, housing, labor rights, family and medical leave, social security, financial regulations, k-12 education, college debt and loans, race relations, ect.', ">>{MammalMolester} : What she says vs. how she's voted on issues and handled her actual policy for the past 16 years", ">>{johnlen356} : Unfortunately she's given us zero reason to trust anything she says or proposes. It's a shame, really; how much of her platform will Clinton actually support? Only the parts her donors approve of?", '>>{trimeta} : Nope, I was just expressing my appreciation for the best of the leaked emails.', ">>{radicalelation} : That's a big part of how Dubya won. He was likable and Gore wasn't. Policy was secondary for many.", ">>{syllabic} : You know GWB expanded medicare right? He's responsible for medicare part D, arguably one of the more successful parts.", '>>{DrunkyMcKrankentroll} : More like sneering at them in disdain from inside a bubble of their own creation, smugly confident in their own superiority.', '>>{LukeforBernie} : Okay well let\'s see what I can think of on the top of my head: Gay marriage Iraq war TPP Keystone XL pipeline 1990s crime bill "Since when do Democrats attack each other on universal healthcare?"', '>>{antisocially_awkward} : If you dont trust her platform then look at her voting record. Heres an article that analyzes her voting record along with public statements and fundraising during her senate career According to the article she was more liberal than 70% of democrats in the senate and 85% of total senate members. For comparison Obama was only more liberal than 82% of the senate during the same time period. http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/hillary-clinton-was-liberal-hillary-clinton-is-liberal/', ">>{johnlen356} : Sorry dude, her voting record is more of a testament against her than for her. And you know what? I'm still bitter. I'm still bitter that we could've had the most progressive candidate we've ever seen in our lives, a candidate who'd likely have a 10+ point lead aright now, and who had a consistently better voting record than Clinton (yeah yeah 93%, it's the 7% difference that's crucial). But no, we got Clinton, who needs an army of internet apologists to convince voters like myself that's she's not totally reprehensible. Sorry, she is. Jill Stein has my vote. It's a little late in the game to try and change minds towards Hillary.", '>>{ParanoydAndroid} : This is the right way to interpret the media\'s role in holding Trump accountable. One sees a lot of arguing in this sub between, "the media never challenges Trump" and "They criticize Trump every time he doesn\'t \'god bless you\' after a child sneezes", and both of these things are true. Outlets do seem to jump on Trump for a *ton* of "gaffes" but also never really engage on things like his actual foreign policy, secret plan to fight ISIS, his confidence that he "knows more than the generals", or his literally world-endingly crazy beliefs about trade agreements, tariffs, and debt default.. Sanders has it exactly correct: the issue is a media focus on Trump\'s (admittedly awful) personality and not on Trump-as-President.', '>>{EmperorMarcus} : can you link to a post analysis please? I believe you 100% but id love something to shut up the pro-Hillary crowd constantly acting like im a conspiracy nut for saying he shouldve won', ">>{EmperorMarcus} : and they'll pass it in office. mark my words", '>>{NikoKun} : No prob, here: http://usapoliticsnow.com/election-justice-usa-finds-bernie-sanders-lost-estimated-184-delegates-election-fraud/ www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4uurnu/election_justice_usa_finds_that_bernie_sanders/ Without all the funny-business that took place, that disadvantaged Bernie and favored Hillary, "Bernie would have won 2030 pledged delegates, with Clinton at 2021 pledged delegates." Of course the mainstream media didn\'t report on this.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{Majnum} : What does Trump mean when he says he will deport 'criminal' immigrants first?", '>>{mwsomerset} : He means the same thing Obama is currently doing, deporting those illegal immigrants who committed crimes first.', ">>{OctoberxxxSurprise} : Not the same as Obama, who doesn't deport illegal aliens from sanctuary cities. Trump will deport all known illegal alien criminals, first. Duh.", '>>{greenlife4} : The. Riminala arsenthe people that need our love th mostie.', ">>{megablahblah} : If an illegal alien commits a crime, but lives in Los Angeles, Obama won't deport them?", '>>{alexanderwales} : I looked this up, because I was curious. [This was the closest I could find.](http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/obama-immigration-sanctuary-cities-219754)', ">>{megablahblah} : Wow, these cities sound crazy. I don't see why they would take it to that degree.", ">>{nit-picky} : So Trump will use the power of the Federal Government to override the laws of cities and states? I never thought I'd hear Republicans wanting to see the Federal Government become more powerful, at the expense of local government.", ">>{alexanderwales} : [The Daily Beast has a good article](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/03/exploding-the-myth-of-sanctuary-cities.html) on sanctuary cities you might find interesting, since it's sort of a primer.", '>>{megablahblah} : First he says sanctuary cities are a myth, then says this: > Some ordinances might bar local officers from cooperating with immigration agents at traffic stops. Others might bar federal authorities from ascertaining the immigration status of those booked. Others might prohibit the release to federal officials of any suspect who could be an illegal immigrant. The issue of sanctuary cities surfaces whenever an illegal immigrant commits a horrendous crime in a place with ordinances like these on the books. I live in L.A. and this sounds crazy. Looking the other way when you have an illegal parent or grandparent taking care of a child born here is one thing ... going out of your way to prevent ICE from deporting criminals is insane.', '>>{OctoberxxxSurprise} : He will move to deport all illegal aliens with a criminal history, yes. I am all for that.'], [">>{YuYuHunter} : Sanders: Clinton needs to 'get away from all of this personality stuff' with Trump", ">>{conanthecnidarian} : He couldn't even get any points ahead of Hillary.", '>>{DefinitelyIngenuous} : He definitely would have taken a different tact than HRC did.', '>>{JustGotOffOfTheTrain} : The sad truth is that, if Bernie was the Democratic nominee, the media would still probably only cover him at about a quarter of the level they cover Trump.', ">>{conanthecnidarian} : No, because the voters picked her over him. That's sort of how elections work.", '>>{JoeSchadsSource} : Yeah but people sent some mean e-mails so that means it was rigged!', ">>{Hill_Dawg_2016} : Think of the collusion! Why won't anyone think of the collusion!!", '>>{Ins_Weltall} : In a completely fair and unbiased primary! /s', ">>{TW3_ModSquad} : This election is starting to show a disturbing resemblance to 2000. Everyone mocked Bush as this stupid Texan who said ridiculous things. We painted him as a low-brow fratboy born with a silver spoon up his ass. Democrats were smug, assured their low-energy establishment pick would waltz into office. And then we lost. We didn't know how high the stakes were.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : How dare you! It's so obvious that the election was rigged! Just look at this [tell-all email](https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/19663)! How anyone can say that the election wasn't rigs escapes me.", '>>{toolish22} : Who knows what happens if it was a level playing field. Remember Debbie "6 debates is enough" Schultz? What ever happened to her just wondering?', '>>{1000000students} : Thank you and in addition they would dredge up stuff that didnt exist', ">>{LeftousCrusader} : It's much worse than 2000 because the backlash is spreading down the ballot.", ">>{Busybyeski} : How did the DNC learn nothing in that time??? They could be to blame for a presidency worse than W's.", ">>{thegoodbadandsmoggy} : I believe it actually has its roots in the great Galician Thumb Wars of 134AD It was a long, pointy weapon you would push in to your enemies. Shortened from 'Attack', this effective and deadly weapon became known as a tack.", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : I agree. She should focus on stuff like the deficit his tax plan would create or how the tariffs would affect the economy.', ">>{UrukHaiGuyz} : It's kind of like a more extreme version. Trump is way more outrageous than the worst of W's verbal bumbling, and Clinton, while similarly bland to Gore, has a host of skeletons in her closet that he didn't.", '>>{FricasseeingRabbit} : democrats have a proud history of underestimating the competition.', '>>{Martholomule} : Fun fact, those gifted with the weapon would quickly rise through the Galican ranks - sometimes all the way up to leadership positions, based on skill with the tack alone. This came to be known as the "rule of thumb".', ">>{P0NYP0UNDER} : And he'd still be wrecking Trump by a huge margin. Because people genuinely like Bernie even if they don't agree with his politics.", ">>{dustoff122} : the thing that's really scary is that this has been every presidential election since the expansion of media. It becomes less about policies and more about personality. How George Bush could have possibly gotten a second term is unimaginable but when you think of how the average person pays attention to politics, then you realize the higher character always gets the most exposure and has an easier chance to win the people over. We were lucky to have a competent president in Obama who also had a great personality, but this election its looking bleak. If we just look at all the terrible things Donald Trump has said and how quickly he rose through the polls just after 1 week of Clintons health scare, then you start to realize that people really aren't paying attention anymore. People are watching this election like its a TV show and this is Trump's natural habitat, where everyone can dissect his character but as long as he's on tv then he has time to win people over.", ">>{thegoodbadandsmoggy} : Of course it wasn't easy to ascend the ranks of this noble warrior class. Many green thumbs were lost. Historians have consider this period of social development to be quite the nail-biter.", '>>{UrukHaiGuyz} : Ah! A very good point. While you are of course correct, what\'s less well known about the Galician Thumb Wars of 134AD is that the phrase "take a different tack" originated in response to the spear-like (or "tack like") formations used by Galician trireme captains, whose lead ship boasted a fearsome pointed ram. Thus to "take a different tack" means to dodge the initial ship and take the hit from a weaker ship. Thanks for promoting and expounding on these important matters of historical record.', ">>{LukeforBernie} : Exactly. Whether you like Bernie or not, you know he isn't bullshitting you. You'll know exactly what he'll try to do in office. With Clinton, you have no idea because she's a kite in the wind with her positions", ">>{LukeforBernie} : I've been saying this for many months now. If Clinton tries to beat Trump at his own game, she *will* lose", ">>{LeftousCrusader} : Clinton needs to get away from TPP. That's what Clinton needs.", '>>{lcarlson6082} : She and Tim Kaine have already made it clear that they supported earlier versions, the changes made recently are unacceptable.', '>>{annoyingstranger} : That\'s all they have to disagree about, though. Trump\'s going to do what Generic_Republican_Bot would do, but he\'ll keep the rhetoric nice and inflammatory. If they were to have an argument on substance, it would be a series of, "Yeah, but that\'s not important because..." "Well, obviously, but that\'s not important because..."', '>>{NikoKun} : I know.. how sad is that. They had a guy who could have easily wiped the floor with the opponent, and who by most post-analysis should have won the primary, but instead the DNC choose to rig it all against him, and risk Trump to protect their establishment.', ">>{fsm_the_alfredo} : > she's a kite in the wind with her positions Which positions?", '>>{Madomb01} : I am from Kentucky and this is how Matt Bevins got elected. Conway pretty much ran the campaign of "I\'m not Bevins" and it failed. There was only a 30% turnout to the polls and Bevin walked away with almost every county. Every conversation was "he\'s not Bevin". They couldn\'t tell me any policies or even his name half the time. This is how they lost KY and this is how they will lose the election.', ">>{SikhAndDestroy} : I'm not sure if you guys are just making shit up but I'm going to quote you at a party regardless of the accuracy.", '>>{jsmooth7} : Based on what? Bernie is popular right now because no one is attacking him. If he won the primaries, the Republicans would have attacked him non-stop.', ">>{MammalMolester} : Clinton's policy is also pretty much identical to what Bush's presidential policies ended up being.", '>>{TrippleTonyHawk} : which changes do they object to that were made after their support? Tim Kaine supported the TPP until he became the VP pick.', '>>{MammalMolester} : You underestimate just how politically stratified America is in 2016. This race would e 50/50 regardless of who the nominees are, especially after feeling betrayed by two terms of Obama who was supposed to be a liberator but ended up warhawking with Russia and the Middle East and selling out the middle class', ">>{trimeta} : When she talks about policy, the media (and by extension, the public) doesn't care. They'd rather report on personal attacks, so she's just playing to the crowd. Of course, Trump is a master of personal attacks, so this still could be a losing strategy.", ">>{TheDarkAgniRises} : On a serious note, if you really do think the election was rigged, then I got a 'tiny suggestion' for ya.", ">>{MiltOnTilt} : You know how I know you're not serious about the issues?", '>>{antisocially_awkward} : Except for her position on medicare, medicaid, healthcare in general, voting rights, environmentalism, gun rights, taxes, welfare, schools and childcare in general, lbgt rights, immigration, housing, labor rights, family and medical leave, social security, financial regulations, k-12 education, college debt and loans, race relations, ect.', ">>{MammalMolester} : What she says vs. how she's voted on issues and handled her actual policy for the past 16 years", ">>{johnlen356} : Unfortunately she's given us zero reason to trust anything she says or proposes. It's a shame, really; how much of her platform will Clinton actually support? Only the parts her donors approve of?", '>>{trimeta} : Nope, I was just expressing my appreciation for the best of the leaked emails.', ">>{radicalelation} : That's a big part of how Dubya won. He was likable and Gore wasn't. Policy was secondary for many.", ">>{syllabic} : You know GWB expanded medicare right? He's responsible for medicare part D, arguably one of the more successful parts.", '>>{DrunkyMcKrankentroll} : More like sneering at them in disdain from inside a bubble of their own creation, smugly confident in their own superiority.', '>>{LukeforBernie} : Okay well let\'s see what I can think of on the top of my head: Gay marriage Iraq war TPP Keystone XL pipeline 1990s crime bill "Since when do Democrats attack each other on universal healthcare?"', '>>{antisocially_awkward} : If you dont trust her platform then look at her voting record. Heres an article that analyzes her voting record along with public statements and fundraising during her senate career According to the article she was more liberal than 70% of democrats in the senate and 85% of total senate members. For comparison Obama was only more liberal than 82% of the senate during the same time period. http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/hillary-clinton-was-liberal-hillary-clinton-is-liberal/', ">>{johnlen356} : Sorry dude, her voting record is more of a testament against her than for her. And you know what? I'm still bitter. I'm still bitter that we could've had the most progressive candidate we've ever seen in our lives, a candidate who'd likely have a 10+ point lead aright now, and who had a consistently better voting record than Clinton (yeah yeah 93%, it's the 7% difference that's crucial). But no, we got Clinton, who needs an army of internet apologists to convince voters like myself that's she's not totally reprehensible. Sorry, she is. Jill Stein has my vote. It's a little late in the game to try and change minds towards Hillary.", '>>{ParanoydAndroid} : This is the right way to interpret the media\'s role in holding Trump accountable. One sees a lot of arguing in this sub between, "the media never challenges Trump" and "They criticize Trump every time he doesn\'t \'god bless you\' after a child sneezes", and both of these things are true. Outlets do seem to jump on Trump for a *ton* of "gaffes" but also never really engage on things like his actual foreign policy, secret plan to fight ISIS, his confidence that he "knows more than the generals", or his literally world-endingly crazy beliefs about trade agreements, tariffs, and debt default.. Sanders has it exactly correct: the issue is a media focus on Trump\'s (admittedly awful) personality and not on Trump-as-President.', '>>{EmperorMarcus} : can you link to a post analysis please? I believe you 100% but id love something to shut up the pro-Hillary crowd constantly acting like im a conspiracy nut for saying he shouldve won', ">>{EmperorMarcus} : and they'll pass it in office. mark my words", '>>{NikoKun} : No prob, here: http://usapoliticsnow.com/election-justice-usa-finds-bernie-sanders-lost-estimated-184-delegates-election-fraud/ www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4uurnu/election_justice_usa_finds_that_bernie_sanders/ Without all the funny-business that took place, that disadvantaged Bernie and favored Hillary, "Bernie would have won 2030 pledged delegates, with Clinton at 2021 pledged delegates." Of course the mainstream media didn\'t report on this.'], [">>{r4816} : GOP think tank: Trump's plans would just run up debt", ">>{ozabelle} : well duh. but then it is amazing they'd admit it. if it was jub! they wouldn't. they'd be scared.", '>>{apollo151} : ...duh? By reducing tax revenue for the government and then immediately turning around and demanding a massive infrastructure plan that surpasses the freaking Great Wall of China in terms of scale?', ">>{greenissexy} : Clinton's plans to massively increase the tax rate is good for the people. Good for the people.", ">>{tenclubber} : His plans would also run up women's skirts as well.", '>>{ImNotARobotNo5} : [LMAO! We have a debt based currency, thank you democrats, that depends on constantly growing the debt to work!]( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0)', ">>{TygerPanzy} : I've never found [Heather Long](http://money.cnn.com/author/heather-long/index.html)'s commentary very compelling. I'm never really sure what message she's trying to convey.", '>>{Rocksbury} : Obama doubled the debt. Using Clintons defense of Barrack Trump will have simply inherited a broken mess.', '>>{apollo151} : You going to ignore that the United States has had 18 Republican presidents, 11 of which have been over the past 100 years?', '>>{VROF} : The debt is going to continue to go up as long as we keep cutting taxes and having a $5 trillion war. We have to pay for things somehow.', '>>{VROF} : The Iraq and Afghanistan wars have cost $5 trillion with no end in sight. And during that time we have continued to cut taxes. How are we expecting to pay for it?', ">>{greenissexy} : She just said the increased spending doesn't add a penny to the debt.", ">>{VROF} : Well it wouldn't if it is offset by tax increases.", '>>{apollo151} : And Bush right before him added about $8 trillion himself. Do some basic economics research.', ">>{executivemonkey} : WRONG. We're going to declare bankruptcy, folks. It's the easiest thing. I've done it a half dozen times, easiest thing in the world. We won't even have to pay our contractors.", ">>{BeowulfShaeffer} : Trump is right about one thing - if we can grow the economy faster than the debt then the debt-to-GDP ratio shrinks without austerity. However, I don't believe for a second Trump would manage that.", ">>{bboyjkang} : >Wallace: Mr. Trump, even conservative economists who have looked at your plan say that the numbers don't add up, that your idea, and you've talked about 25 million jobs created, 4%. >Wallace: Growth is unrealistic. >And they say you talk a lot about growing the energy industry. >They say with oil prices as they are right now, that's unrealistic as well.\xa0 http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/10/19/13336894/third-presidential-debate-live-transcript-clinton-trump", ">>{PresOrangeBuffoon} : No. he doesn't plan. He just grabs it.", ">>{ImNotARobotNo5} : Is that you trying to excuse the keeping of our corrupt currency system as it's described in the video?", ">>{apollo151} : No I'm stating that you and your YouTube video from a crackpot ignores that the bulk of the issues stem from decisions made by Republicans. Good luck losing in this election. Hopefully the shock and surprise that an unprepared jackass loses to a career politician doesn't kill you.", ">>{ImNotARobotNo5} : > No I'm stating that you and your YouTube video from a crackpot ignores that the bulk of the issues stem from decisions made by Republicans. What issues are those when in fact the root problem is a corrupt debt based currency the democrats gave us? For example, our debt based currency cuts the dollar in half in 35 years at just 2% inflation. Which I am sure you like that inflation. So how is it you think it's a republican problem when you probably want to keep our corrupt currency?", '>>{apollo151} : What evidentiary support do you have for a claim which completely disregards the BIpartisan aspect of the BIpartisan democracy. And by evidentiary support, I mean not a YouTube video and actual backing from reputable sources with knowledge in finances, economics, political science, law, and history.', '>>{ImNotARobotNo5} : Somehow I knew you were feigning disgust with the republicans. You are part of the problem.', ">>{apollo151} : Oh I have no issue with Republicans. It's the GOP leadership and Trump and people like yourself that bitch and bitch, yet never have any sort of actual evidence for your claims. I literally just asked you for proof and you turned it around to insult me. You completely bypassed my request for you to actually backup your statements with the most basic level of evidentiary support. Your type is the problem because you make baseless claims with no grounding in reality and then you scare people until they are frightened enough to believe any moronically garbage statement that you spew out of that anus you call a mouth.", '>>{ImNotARobotNo5} : > yet never have any sort of actual evidence for your claims. >I literally just asked you for proof and you turned it around to insult me. What would you like explained to you?', ">>{Stuwi} : It's Congress that has the power of purse, not the President.", '>>{apollo151} : Your statement that Democrats are solely to blame for a currency that was developed by a bipartisan government.', '>>{ImNotARobotNo5} : It was the democrats doing in giving us the federal reserve. Also, just because the republicans may have gone along with it does not make it a good idea. Your stance makes it look like you agree with the corruption.', ">>{apollo151} : Issue 1: The idea of a central bank run by the government had been an idea since the Founding Fathers. Meaning that the idea of a central federal bank in this country is LITERALLY older than the United States itself. And the Federal Reserve came into existence because the Republicans were too busy fighting amongst themselves in 1913 to actually beat Woodrow Wilson in an election. So congratulations, you can blame your own party's historical ineptitude when it comes to actually agreeing on anything for the current existence of the Federal Reserve. Issue 2: You did not state any facts or provide actual evidence to back up your claims. Again. And then you immediately somehow jumped to the conclusion that I agree with corruption in order to somehow discredit me when I am asking YOU to PROVE that your statements are correct. Which is blatantly pathetic and does nothing besides make you seem like an uneducated half-wit. I.E. Just like your presidential candidate. Boom, mic drop.", ">>{ImNotARobotNo5} : > Issue 1: The idea of a central bank run by the government had been an idea since the Founding Fathers. Meaning that the idea of a central federal bank in this country is LITERALLY older than the United States itself. And the Federal Reserve came into existence because the Republicans were too busy fighting amongst themselves in 1913 to actually beat Woodrow Wilson in an election. So congratulations, you can blame your own party's historical ineptitude when it comes to actually agreeing on anything for the current existence of the Federal Reserve. I blame the corrupt democrats that put forward a private central bank that makes bankers rich from it's new debt based currency. Notice how I included the paper fiat, debt based currency, and you did not. > > > > Issue 2: You did not state any facts or provide actual evidence to back up your claims. Where is your voting record, who put it forth, and who signed it into law proving it was not the democrats? >And then you immediately somehow jumped to the conclusion that I agree with corruption You are not agreeing that our debt based currency system to bankers is corrupt. >in order to somehow discredit me when I am asking YOU to PROVE that your statements are correct. Which is blatantly pathetic and does nothing besides make you seem like an uneducated half-wit. I.E. Just like your presidential candidate. > > > > Boom, mic drop. You also try to change the subject so you dont have to be pinned down on whether or not our currency system is corrupt. I wont hold my breath."]]

classify and reply

['>>{Hillarysbleachedanus} : Hillary Clinton caught on tape, "I\'ll have you killed you insignificant little shit".', '>>{I_politics} : Not renewable: Bill would ban utilities from using renewable energy', '>>{NittanyOrange} : One look around the DNC floor shows the major difference between this convention and the RNC', ">>{atda} : Sorry! We can't seem to find the page you were looking for. You may report this page as missing here, or continue your search below.", '>>{SALTED_MEAT} : Not real. Links to nothing. Remeber how rad Digg was?', ">>{mcthornbody420} : I still go there.. Great for shit that hadn't hit reddit yet. lol", ">>{Idolglows} : Oh my **GOD** look at all those white people I thought the DNC was the minority party where the POC at it's like a klan meeting", ">>{I_politics} : [Here is the link](http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2017/Introduced/SF0071.pdf) to the actual bill in case the reader is thinking it is fake news. It's Wyoming in case you were wondering who introduced this gem of a bill. I know it won't pass, but why do it in the first place? > The bill, whose sponsors are primarily\xa0from the state’s top coal-producing counties, would require utilities to\xa0use only\xa0approved energy sources like\xa0coal, natural gas,\xa0nuclear power, hydroelectric, and oil. While individual homeowners and small businesses could still use rooftop solar or backyard wind, utilities\xa0would face steep fines if they served up clean energy.", ">>{Mattisthe1} : /u/Hillarysbleachedanus proves to be as accurate a source as Hillary's mouth.", '>>{teddysblackhat} : I cannot imagine that will pass, but it is scary as waking up to find the Burger King King standing next to your bed.', '>>{MistaMxyzptlk} : One of the Oranatang’s minions that is infesting the world.', '>>{WaltBush} : Congratulations, you have identified literally the most superficial thing about convention delegates.', ">>{Cpt_Nosferatu} : Don't worry guys, it's just the party of deregulation, regulating an industry to help out their backers. Nothing to see here.", '>>{Surturinn} : Damn, this would have made me like her.', ">>{gaeuvyen} : The burden of proof is on the ones saying that she said it. You don't make a claim and then expect people to research it for you.", ">>{ImmoKnight} : Race baiting... It's kind of getting old. DNC has seemingly given up on the supreme court scare as well... that was something. I am tired of the Russian scare now too... Oh look, he is a racist again. The media is embarrassing itself at this point.", ">>{noopept2} : I'm not making the claim though. It's what MSNBC is reporting", '>>{Uncle_Tom1} : I doubt this actually passes. How does this bill make any sense economically?', '>>{joker68} : All I see on the DNC floor are illegal aliens and treasonous racist assholes.', ">>{DomiNatron2212} : I didn't see them report it.. I saw a dead link.", '>>{like_ya_do} : The word you\'re looking for is "orangutan."', ">>{chasjo} : Hilarious that they would ban wind energy in Wyoming. In case you've never been to Wyoming, it is the most windy place in America. Highways have wind warning signs all over the place, and they aren't kidding. Your car will routinely be blasted hard enough to make it hard to control. Locals told me that it was common to have siding blown right off your house. Guy told me that if you see a loose spot of siding you get on it because in Wyoming the wind will peel your house like an orange.", '>>{daveg243} : All the flags at the DNC were outside getting burned.', '>>{wraithtek} : [There were flags at the DNC](http://www.snopes.com/flags-banned-at-dnc/). Just not enough for Donald/The_Donald\'s liking. Must... have... more... flags! Not enough flags = not American! (At least, not "real" American!)', ">>{NeoAcario} : Don't think the Rpubs can outdo previous hypocrisy? Wait a while...", '>>{Kinases} : It means something that one of our major political parties is incapable of appealing to non-white voters.', ">>{Hillarysbleachedanus} : I'm not a trump supporter, I actually voted for Carly Finorina", ">>{GunOfSod} : Next she'll start removing anyone who has read this p", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : > The diversity at the DNC is much different. Yeah. 700 of 'em are actors! https://web.archive.org/web/20160727163255/https://philadelphia.craigslist.org/tlg/5702670381.html", '>>{nathan8999} : I notice the DNC spent the entire night talking about the "pay gap" and only focusing on girl child trafficking as well. Complete disregard for the problems males face.', '>>{SchwarzerKaffee} : The Burger King used to do porn before he landed that gig. Might be fake news, but enjoy your next whopper', '>>{sheshesheila} : I think the DNC has had more black speakers than the RNC had black delegates.', '>>{Plugawy_Nedznik} : Ha! Say that to my face fucker and not online and see what happens.', ">>{kevie3drinks} : This is the kind of thing that would be required just so coal can begin to be thought of as a viable, competitive industry. That's how silly the idea of bringing coal jobs back really is.", '>>{314stachio} : It means something that one of our major politcal parties is incapable of appealing to half of their base.', ">>{roboboogienights} : Only if you're a coal baron who has hijacked a legislature.", ">>{PantsMcGillicuddy} : Yeah, it's not like just anybody can put out a Craigslist ad, those take high level credentials.", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : As the Clintons could tell you... there ain't no loyalty like paid loyalty.", ">>{Rustyastro} : Yeah they'll report proof of ghosts before they ever cover the dnc emails in an informative way.", '>>{ihavesensitiveknees} : That is what is known as an alternate fact.', '>>{downloadingYourRAMs} : So are\xa0Republicans finally\xa0abandoning their pretenses\xa0that they actually care about less regulation?', '>>{ImmoKnight} : New e-mails implicating Clinton in a pay to play operation that she personally orchestrated: "Breaking News: Trump believes in ghosts... how can trust him to run this country if he believes in things that aren\'t real."', ">>{superdago} : Apparently it's cheaper for coal companies to buy congressman than it is to buy windmills. I mean, why not just invest in new tech?", '>>{Hellmark} : Because that would mean that they have to admit that their way of life is dying, and they need to change.', '>>{beckettman} : I know everybody thinks of themselves as the hero of their own story but how do these guys look in the mirror and not see a cartoonish one-dimensional tool of a villain?', '>>{zenthr} : No, this is less regulation. Elitists are confusing the issue intentionally. </s>', ">>{zxcvb94105} : I haven't seen a lot of comments about the included video, but the absolute fraud and cherry-picking of data to refute evidence is infuriating. When you're position is so weak that you have to lie to this level (creation of alternative facts) you have to know deep down that you're a corrupt SOB. https://youtu.be/BJWq1FeGpCw", ">>{ehjun} : Except it is. And they have one of the largest wind farms to utilize it. It's not like they make them out of tooth picks."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{I_politics} : Not renewable: Bill would ban utilities from using renewable energy', ">>{I_politics} : [Here is the link](http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2017/Introduced/SF0071.pdf) to the actual bill in case the reader is thinking it is fake news. It's Wyoming in case you were wondering who introduced this gem of a bill. I know it won't pass, but why do it in the first place? > The bill, whose sponsors are primarily\xa0from the state’s top coal-producing counties, would require utilities to\xa0use only\xa0approved energy sources like\xa0coal, natural gas,\xa0nuclear power, hydroelectric, and oil. While individual homeowners and small businesses could still use rooftop solar or backyard wind, utilities\xa0would face steep fines if they served up clean energy.", '>>{teddysblackhat} : I cannot imagine that will pass, but it is scary as waking up to find the Burger King King standing next to your bed.', ">>{Cpt_Nosferatu} : Don't worry guys, it's just the party of deregulation, regulating an industry to help out their backers. Nothing to see here.", '>>{Uncle_Tom1} : I doubt this actually passes. How does this bill make any sense economically?', ">>{chasjo} : Hilarious that they would ban wind energy in Wyoming. In case you've never been to Wyoming, it is the most windy place in America. Highways have wind warning signs all over the place, and they aren't kidding. Your car will routinely be blasted hard enough to make it hard to control. Locals told me that it was common to have siding blown right off your house. Guy told me that if you see a loose spot of siding you get on it because in Wyoming the wind will peel your house like an orange.", ">>{NeoAcario} : Don't think the Rpubs can outdo previous hypocrisy? Wait a while...", '>>{SchwarzerKaffee} : The Burger King used to do porn before he landed that gig. Might be fake news, but enjoy your next whopper', ">>{kevie3drinks} : This is the kind of thing that would be required just so coal can begin to be thought of as a viable, competitive industry. That's how silly the idea of bringing coal jobs back really is.", ">>{roboboogienights} : Only if you're a coal baron who has hijacked a legislature.", '>>{ihavesensitiveknees} : That is what is known as an alternate fact.', '>>{downloadingYourRAMs} : So are\xa0Republicans finally\xa0abandoning their pretenses\xa0that they actually care about less regulation?', ">>{superdago} : Apparently it's cheaper for coal companies to buy congressman than it is to buy windmills. I mean, why not just invest in new tech?", '>>{Hellmark} : Because that would mean that they have to admit that their way of life is dying, and they need to change.', '>>{beckettman} : I know everybody thinks of themselves as the hero of their own story but how do these guys look in the mirror and not see a cartoonish one-dimensional tool of a villain?', '>>{zenthr} : No, this is less regulation. Elitists are confusing the issue intentionally. </s>', ">>{zxcvb94105} : I haven't seen a lot of comments about the included video, but the absolute fraud and cherry-picking of data to refute evidence is infuriating. When you're position is so weak that you have to lie to this level (creation of alternative facts) you have to know deep down that you're a corrupt SOB. https://youtu.be/BJWq1FeGpCw", ">>{ehjun} : Except it is. And they have one of the largest wind farms to utilize it. It's not like they make them out of tooth picks."], ['>>{Hillarysbleachedanus} : Hillary Clinton caught on tape, "I\'ll have you killed you insignificant little shit".', ">>{atda} : Sorry! We can't seem to find the page you were looking for. You may report this page as missing here, or continue your search below.", '>>{SALTED_MEAT} : Not real. Links to nothing. Remeber how rad Digg was?', ">>{mcthornbody420} : I still go there.. Great for shit that hadn't hit reddit yet. lol", ">>{Mattisthe1} : /u/Hillarysbleachedanus proves to be as accurate a source as Hillary's mouth.", '>>{MistaMxyzptlk} : One of the Oranatang’s minions that is infesting the world.', '>>{Surturinn} : Damn, this would have made me like her.', ">>{gaeuvyen} : The burden of proof is on the ones saying that she said it. You don't make a claim and then expect people to research it for you.", ">>{noopept2} : I'm not making the claim though. It's what MSNBC is reporting", ">>{DomiNatron2212} : I didn't see them report it.. I saw a dead link.", '>>{like_ya_do} : The word you\'re looking for is "orangutan."', ">>{Hillarysbleachedanus} : I'm not a trump supporter, I actually voted for Carly Finorina", ">>{GunOfSod} : Next she'll start removing anyone who has read this p", '>>{Plugawy_Nedznik} : Ha! Say that to my face fucker and not online and see what happens.'], ['>>{NittanyOrange} : One look around the DNC floor shows the major difference between this convention and the RNC', ">>{Idolglows} : Oh my **GOD** look at all those white people I thought the DNC was the minority party where the POC at it's like a klan meeting", '>>{WaltBush} : Congratulations, you have identified literally the most superficial thing about convention delegates.', ">>{ImmoKnight} : Race baiting... It's kind of getting old. DNC has seemingly given up on the supreme court scare as well... that was something. I am tired of the Russian scare now too... Oh look, he is a racist again. The media is embarrassing itself at this point.", '>>{joker68} : All I see on the DNC floor are illegal aliens and treasonous racist assholes.', '>>{daveg243} : All the flags at the DNC were outside getting burned.', '>>{wraithtek} : [There were flags at the DNC](http://www.snopes.com/flags-banned-at-dnc/). Just not enough for Donald/The_Donald\'s liking. Must... have... more... flags! Not enough flags = not American! (At least, not "real" American!)', '>>{Kinases} : It means something that one of our major political parties is incapable of appealing to non-white voters.', ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : > The diversity at the DNC is much different. Yeah. 700 of 'em are actors! https://web.archive.org/web/20160727163255/https://philadelphia.craigslist.org/tlg/5702670381.html", '>>{nathan8999} : I notice the DNC spent the entire night talking about the "pay gap" and only focusing on girl child trafficking as well. Complete disregard for the problems males face.', '>>{sheshesheila} : I think the DNC has had more black speakers than the RNC had black delegates.', '>>{314stachio} : It means something that one of our major politcal parties is incapable of appealing to half of their base.', ">>{PantsMcGillicuddy} : Yeah, it's not like just anybody can put out a Craigslist ad, those take high level credentials.", ">>{SlicedDicedBeef} : As the Clintons could tell you... there ain't no loyalty like paid loyalty.", ">>{Rustyastro} : Yeah they'll report proof of ghosts before they ever cover the dnc emails in an informative way.", '>>{ImmoKnight} : New e-mails implicating Clinton in a pay to play operation that she personally orchestrated: "Breaking News: Trump believes in ghosts... how can trust him to run this country if he believes in things that aren\'t real."']]

classify and reply

['>>{gerberlifegrowupplan} : Holy shit, their current one is already the fastest android phone at the best price!', '>>{malcolmX_} : The only reason not to buy a product from OnePlus is their shitty customer service. Very sad for such beautiful products.', '>>{OfficialBeard} : Fastest Android phone? No its not. That honor goes to the S7 Edge.', ">>{jo-shabadoo} : That and the phone crashes when it gets even slightly hot. Need to use your phone after it's been in your pocket for a few hours? Too bad. Want to use it in any place where it's hot? No chance", ">>{kcoisaxunga} : not true at all, you should check yours... I have the display on for several hours straight, need to charge it 2-3 times a day and never crashes. It's true that the phone gets really hot sometimes, but no crashes.", '>>{Quinnjester} : Gary Johnson Takes More Votes From Clinton, Not Trump', '>>{Gihrenia} : Shoddy software release cycle as well, but still a lot better than other brands.', '>>{y2k2r2d2} : OP3 Has a really great feel. It feels great on hands.', ">>{garbagemanlb} : And I'm sure Jill Stein takes more votes from Trump than Clinton.", ">>{kiwisrkool} : Doubt it. Greens are on the left of the political spectrum. Further left than Dems. So very unlikely she'll damage Trump except for spoiler votes. Her majority of support are ex Dem supporters", ">>{CTR_Disinfo_Agent} : I've long suspected this. He's too rational to sway Republican voters. If it was Ron Paul or another lolbertarian, they would be taking from Trump, but not Gary. Either way she's still winning, and on election day both third parties will underperform as usual.", '>>{annoyingstranger} : Does anyone for a moment think that a Trump defeat will stop him?', '>>{ban---CTR} : They\'re not going anywhere. They\'re staying right where they are, growing in numbers as a protest vote, and reminding the to shitstain false dichotomy choices about what\'s up for grabs should they actually inspire confidence instead of relying on the frustratingly large base of baby birds persisting on regurgitated talking points and not actually looking at the trustworthiness of candidates, how new their ideas are compared to what actually is known to work and not work, and how likely they\'ll be to stick to their platform. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have to be the two most likely candidates in history to betray their platform and are also coincidentally the two least liked. This is what false dichotomies get you. I will not choose to endorse these two assclowns because they do not inspire confidence. I hope the number of people voting third party as a protest vote, while voting for the sake of their local government continues to grow inspite of all the idiots mocking them for not seeing that "lesser of two evils" is turning into a drone as well as a self fulfilling prophecy.', '>>{gbeezy007} : S7 edge has the same processor and only 4gb of ram compared to on plus 6gb there arguably same speed. 399 for oneplus3 769 for s7 edge The Google pixel phone has a faster snapdragon 821 which is only a tad faster then the snapdragon 820 in the one plus 3 & s7 edge. I currently have a s7 edge great phone but does seem a little over priced by like 100-150 I got buy one get one free from tmobile though so I was fine with what I paid overall', '>>{OfficialBeard} : ... is no one checking the benchmarks for these devices? Why am I being downvoted? Geekbench puts the S7 Edge on top of the Android list, but 200 points behind the iPhone 7. The Pixel gets 4147. 1000+ points behind the top phones. Jesus Christ you can even find these results yourself.', '>>{sfeeju} : Politically, yes. He might start up this ultra right media empire that everyone seems to assume he will, but it will end in a reverse Midas. His supporters arent going away though.', ">>{annoyingstranger} : Wait... So, he's going to go on in the private sector, and his supporters are going to go on as a political force, but you think his political future will end?", ">>{Kamnnoriel_Huehuehue} : Not because a car has great results on a dyno means it will be the fastest around a track, same goes for phones, the 3 is faster than the s7 as far as I've seen.", '>>{Smokingfatdoobies} : Still rocking my OP1, I had this phone crash once since I got it shortly after release!', '>>{captain_blackadder} : How much $$$ is CTR paying you to peddle this shit?', ">>{overthrow23} : CTR is a debunked conspiracy theory. Think about it - do you *really* think Reddit's higher-ups would allow a candidate they support to so flagrantly manipulate their website in such a way? Next you'll be claiming they changed their algorithms, also to the benefit of the same candidate which they support. This is why Hillary will win. All the GOP can do is traffic in conspiracy theories that have already been disproven by the media.", '>>{AnthonyGonzalez27780} : > how likely they\'ll be to stick to their platform. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have to be the two most likely candidates in history to betray their platform If you look at presidents through US history, the one issue that no biography or documentary ever talks about is "how closely the president stuck to the convention\'s party platform," because no one has ever or will ever care about that.', '>>{Uptight_Kraut} : Only because Trump has so few to take from.', ">>{HenryWCoveredInBees} : This is literally because HRC has more votes. In a two way race, it's 48/42, and when you add Gary Johnson, Hillary loses 6 points and Trump loses 4, and Gary gets 8.7. Not sure where the other 1% goes, but that seems to suggest a problem with the polls. Realistically though, what is this trying to suggest? That Democrats have more to offer to Libertarians than Republicans? That HRC should be spending more time campaigning against Johnson? Or that even Libertarians think Trump is nuts?", '>>{Middleageredder} : This proves that Johnson is an alt right racist. He should drop out and endorse Hillary Clinton for the good of America.', ">>{MisterHandagote} : I don't follow phone news closely. Isn't this a little soon?", ">>{morrispated2} : I absolutely couldn't agree more. I wanted to buy their iPhone case and they couldn't figure out a way to ship it to an address that was different from my paypal billing address. They then told me that it wasn't their problem and it was stupid that I didn't live at my paypal billing address and hung up on me. I liked the idea of them but I have never received worse customer service.", ">>{aliengoods1} : The only reason people think Gary Johnson is rational is because they're comparing him to the crazy which is Trump. If Jeb were the nominee, Johnson would be considered the crazy guy in the race.", '>>{creejay} : I can\'t tell if you\'re serious or not. He posts anti-Clinton stories ("Hillary\'s Long, Cozy Love Affairs With Racists") and posts. Is that what CTR would do? Seems like an odd strategy.', ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : That's not how you analyze polls. Get into the top lines, or pivot tables if you can get the raw data and you see Trump loses 2 voters to Johnson for every one Clinton does among those who identity as party and lean party. Among undecideds it's even worse, almost 7 to 1.", ">>{Raccoonpuncher} : People are complimenting OnePlus on their product quality, but isn't it weird to be releasing a phone just four months after their last flagship? I literally got mine on tail-end of October, and just after the return period ends I'm going to find out about the new one.", ">>{apolea} : >8 GB of ram While you're at it, why don't you throw in an i7 and a GTX 1080. I never understood why people need more than 4 gigs of ram for a phone. Even 4 seems kind of overkill. 3 is where the sweet spot is at", ">>{JamoJustReddit} : Your phone is probably defective. My oneplus 3 only runs hot when I'm playing an intensive game on it. It never crashes.", '>>{RenegadeUK} : If you are in the UK, you can buy from O2 and then deal with their customer service instead.', ">>{ArniePie} : I do see in most polls that Johnson wins more Republicans than Democrats, but he does best among independents, which is probably why Clinton's lead drops when Johnson is included in the polls. I don't know where you're getting your 2 to 1 number, and especially your 7 to 1.", ">>{Thecalculatorman} : >He's too rational to sway Republican voters. For some reason I just laughed out loud for real when I read this. Idk why I just found it really funny.", ">>{ArniePie} : While Johnson takes more Republicans than Democrats in most polls I've seen, it's his strength among independents where this metric shows up. A larger portion of the independents he wins would lean Democrat than Republican, but most of his support comes from those who truly want neither Trump or Clinton.", ">>{cylth} : More likely because the GOP has found Clinton to align more closely to their ideas than even Johnson. Because she isn't liberal at all.", '>>{ronic025} : OMG, it sucks to be one who has recently had OnePlus Three shipped. I think I should not to open the package and see what happens on the 15th, especially how much the upgrade will cost.', ">>{cuddlepuncher} : I want to like oneplus because they do a lot of things right, but some of the stuff they do is just confusing. Their method of success was top specs for a very affordable price. They have slowly been increasing prices since the op1. They have reduced the battery capacity. They got rid of invites but the op3 is never in stock anyway and now they're releasing a new phone less than 6 months after their last. At a rumored even higher price. Oneplus, this is what I want. Fill the body out with more battery. Screw dash charge, I want standard quick charging compatibility. 6GB is plenty, 64GB is plenty, 1080p is plenty. Keep the price the same or reduce it and release nougat and keep it to to date. Then release the op4 next year.", ">>{ConceptualTrap} : > no one has ever or will ever care about that Times are changing. The second Clinton goes against the platform in place is the second she's going to get lambasted by Bernie supporters on social media and progressive news outlets like TYT. Now, while these outlets aren't the main stream media, what percentage of millennial voters do you think are actually getting their news from that source? Any deviation to the platform that Sanders helped make is going to come back and bite Clinton in the ass in 4 years when she is, inevitably, back to a heated primary battle against a progressive. If it's not Sanders again, it'll be someone that strongly backed Sanders.", '>>{erix84} : Yeah, took FOREVER to get Marshmallow on my OPX, but it did fix a lot of issues i had with the phone. Better late than never i guess.', ">>{jsagold} : Almost completely with you cuddlepuncher, but I've got to shout for dash charge - it's saved me multiple times!", '>>{Uptight_Kraut} : She was one of the more liberal Senators, but keep living in your own reality.', '>>{cylth} : Tell that to Honduras, to Libya, and to the millions of black Americans in the prison system because of her husbands criminal "justice" overhaul or the ones negatively affected by welfare "reform" during her husband\'s presidency (and whose actions she condoned). You know, all those "superpredators." Tell that to the pharmaceutical companies (who have donated more to her than anyone else) and to all the businesses who have donated to her and influenced the state department when she was SoS. Tell that to all the elites and corporations who just love trade deals that fuck over 90% of the population. So progressive of her, looking out for the top 0.1% and not us peasants.', ">>{captain_blackadder} : They're constantly (in pretty much every post they make) defending Clinton, hates Trump, and are telling people not to vote 3rd party because 3rd party = a vote for Trump. Meanwhile, on the 'anti-Clinton story thread' we've got this gem: > Ugh, what a flagrant hit-piece from a right-wing rag. Posted for debunking purposes ONLY.", '>>{captain_blackadder} : > Tell that to Honduras, to Libya, You can add Haiti to that list as well.', ">>{creejay} : I hope you're not serious. Almost every single article he's posted is Anti-Clinton or trashes Muslims. Pretty clear agenda there.", ">>{cuddlepuncher} : Yeah, dash charge is pretty cool, but i don't think it's worth the incompatibility with all other quick charging and cables. I would rather be able to buy other chargers/cables/battery packs or borrow someone else's and still be able to get quick charging. Oneplus isn't popular enough for anyone else I know to have a dash charger and cable. And having only one manufacturer making the chargers and cables worries me too once the device gets older.", ">>{feline_lunacy} : I've had a very good experience with their customer service. The additional back cover for my OP2 didn't fit properly and I was sent a new one after giving them a link to the imgur album of the fault.", ">>{sr_grey} : I used to own the s7 and the note7 both are a pc of crop and slow down after you use it for a few weeks. I now own the OP3 and its way better than any other phone I've ever had. Don't go off of those numbers", ">>{Cthulos} : Please have expandable memory this time. It would be nice to be able to actually bring my music with me. I live in Canada where we don't have access to unlimited data plans. For now, I'll probably be sticking with my One M8 until it fails.", ">>{malcolmX_} : Sure this isn't even a considerable problem. What I'm saying is problems with battery or problem with any other part of the phone which can't be fixed like you back cover was. If that's the case you'll have to ship the phone over a quiet long distance and will need to pay lots of transport costs. I didnt even mention the shipping duration which is hugh mungus.", ">>{pewnflap} : Perfect. Myself and my girlfriend are still using our Oneplus Ones. I just changed the USB port on my girlfriends because it was acting up. Hopefully we can score some used Onplus 3's for a decent price in a few months.", ">>{Fantastins} : Still getting timely software support as well? I am still rocking a Sammy note 3 only because of the development community. Samsung supported it to 5.0.1, Yet its hardware will run nougat fine and is currently on marshmallow note 7 software with very few issues. The note 4 is the only replacement unit I've found that doesn't take away features.", '>>{pooo_under_looo} : Please have my babies, Carl Pei. *please*!', ">>{UpHandsome} : Don't know about the other guy but I am on cyanogenmod and I get updates every day.", '>>{1802ben} : I have been considering buying a OnePlus phone. People that have them are the worth it?', '>>{Mr_Brown_Pants} : here I am still using my OPO ... no problems with it. Although I noticed it sucks at keeping a connection with BT device.', '>>{Smokingfatdoobies} : yup, get updates on the reg, currently running 6.0.1 Cyanogen OS. Probably gonna pull the trigger and get the OP4, cant beat what OP offers for the money!', ">>{dmnw0w} : I love my OnePlus 3 to death, hands down the best phone I've ever used. I wouldn't swap it for anything else on the market, even ignoring the price,", '>>{Fantastins} : May be a OP3T next week, 4 could be a wait.', '>>{Raccoonpuncher} : A budget phone with a better processor than their current flagship?', ">>{dion_starfire} : I liked mine until the fingerprint sensor suddenly died one night. Didn't get it wet, didn't do anything special. Went to sleep one night with it working, woke up to it not. A bit of research on XDA shows that it's a common problem due to a manufacturing defect (the daughterboard the sensor plugs into isn't properly grounded). Having to use my phone without a home button has soured my opinion of OnePlus a bit.", '>>{AhsanMoin} : They should cover more counties, and improve the OS performance.', ">>{light24bulbs} : A lot of that is because Samsung's software and drivers are really bad.", ">>{ConsentingPenguin} : Is the warranty process still a nightmare to deal with? My Oneplus One quickly developed issues with the digitizer. Everything I read about the process of getting them to repair it seemed like a ridiculous waste of time, so I didn't even bother.", ">>{whatnow00} : chinese phones are being released very quickly right now. the mi5s just came out and now the mi6 is coming out in 2 months. i think they're on a 6 month release cycle right now.", '>>{gbeezy007} : Others have said it but Benchmarks dont mean Much as you think there good for Guideline estimates and thats about it. Especially only geekbench that doesnt account for other parts of the phone like if the storage is slow or not which makes a huge difference hence why SSD in computers is big now. at the END of the Day the Onepuls and s7 have the same exact processor Hardware wise. and you can buy almost 2 for the price of 1 yes the software or themal limits lower the oneplus a little but it does not justify the price', '>>{KMGritz} : Anyone have an idea of a vague time frame when this might go on sale? Been trying to order an OP3 to arrive by xmas (3 week delivery afaik for Ireland) for the last 3 weeks.', ">>{whoaiswho} : I don't know, seems likely that the OPO won't get the Nougat update.", ">>{dmnw0w} : The point of Dash is that it charges your phone super quickly without heating the phone, which does wonders to prevent battery degradation. Other fast charging standards can't do that.", ">>{cuddlepuncher} : Yes, I understand the point of it. It is a cool solution. But I still would rather have compatibility with the vast majority of chargers and cables. Even if the alternatives aren't quite as fast or cool.", ">>{justastocksrt4} : Can someone pm me a good link for a root? I have a note three that's just been laying around and would like to root it on a good set of firmware.", '>>{x-w-j} : I bought Note 4 when Note 7 was in fire to replace my Note 3', ">>{TurboChewy} : If they keep up this fast release cycle, basically every few months a slightly better phone, basically they're disrupting the traditional cycle and allowing people to consider their phones any time of year. You don't have to get the *best* version, just get the current one and it'll be fine. Even if you get that next one, there'll be another new one soon after. Personally I hope they keep up the fast release cycle, it adds more variety."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{Quinnjester} : Gary Johnson Takes More Votes From Clinton, Not Trump', ">>{garbagemanlb} : And I'm sure Jill Stein takes more votes from Trump than Clinton.", ">>{kiwisrkool} : Doubt it. Greens are on the left of the political spectrum. Further left than Dems. So very unlikely she'll damage Trump except for spoiler votes. Her majority of support are ex Dem supporters", ">>{CTR_Disinfo_Agent} : I've long suspected this. He's too rational to sway Republican voters. If it was Ron Paul or another lolbertarian, they would be taking from Trump, but not Gary. Either way she's still winning, and on election day both third parties will underperform as usual.", '>>{annoyingstranger} : Does anyone for a moment think that a Trump defeat will stop him?', '>>{ban---CTR} : They\'re not going anywhere. They\'re staying right where they are, growing in numbers as a protest vote, and reminding the to shitstain false dichotomy choices about what\'s up for grabs should they actually inspire confidence instead of relying on the frustratingly large base of baby birds persisting on regurgitated talking points and not actually looking at the trustworthiness of candidates, how new their ideas are compared to what actually is known to work and not work, and how likely they\'ll be to stick to their platform. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have to be the two most likely candidates in history to betray their platform and are also coincidentally the two least liked. This is what false dichotomies get you. I will not choose to endorse these two assclowns because they do not inspire confidence. I hope the number of people voting third party as a protest vote, while voting for the sake of their local government continues to grow inspite of all the idiots mocking them for not seeing that "lesser of two evils" is turning into a drone as well as a self fulfilling prophecy.', '>>{sfeeju} : Politically, yes. He might start up this ultra right media empire that everyone seems to assume he will, but it will end in a reverse Midas. His supporters arent going away though.', ">>{annoyingstranger} : Wait... So, he's going to go on in the private sector, and his supporters are going to go on as a political force, but you think his political future will end?", '>>{captain_blackadder} : How much $$$ is CTR paying you to peddle this shit?', ">>{overthrow23} : CTR is a debunked conspiracy theory. Think about it - do you *really* think Reddit's higher-ups would allow a candidate they support to so flagrantly manipulate their website in such a way? Next you'll be claiming they changed their algorithms, also to the benefit of the same candidate which they support. This is why Hillary will win. All the GOP can do is traffic in conspiracy theories that have already been disproven by the media.", '>>{AnthonyGonzalez27780} : > how likely they\'ll be to stick to their platform. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have to be the two most likely candidates in history to betray their platform If you look at presidents through US history, the one issue that no biography or documentary ever talks about is "how closely the president stuck to the convention\'s party platform," because no one has ever or will ever care about that.', '>>{Uptight_Kraut} : Only because Trump has so few to take from.', ">>{HenryWCoveredInBees} : This is literally because HRC has more votes. In a two way race, it's 48/42, and when you add Gary Johnson, Hillary loses 6 points and Trump loses 4, and Gary gets 8.7. Not sure where the other 1% goes, but that seems to suggest a problem with the polls. Realistically though, what is this trying to suggest? That Democrats have more to offer to Libertarians than Republicans? That HRC should be spending more time campaigning against Johnson? Or that even Libertarians think Trump is nuts?", '>>{Middleageredder} : This proves that Johnson is an alt right racist. He should drop out and endorse Hillary Clinton for the good of America.', ">>{aliengoods1} : The only reason people think Gary Johnson is rational is because they're comparing him to the crazy which is Trump. If Jeb were the nominee, Johnson would be considered the crazy guy in the race.", '>>{creejay} : I can\'t tell if you\'re serious or not. He posts anti-Clinton stories ("Hillary\'s Long, Cozy Love Affairs With Racists") and posts. Is that what CTR would do? Seems like an odd strategy.', ">>{ShroudedSciuridae} : That's not how you analyze polls. Get into the top lines, or pivot tables if you can get the raw data and you see Trump loses 2 voters to Johnson for every one Clinton does among those who identity as party and lean party. Among undecideds it's even worse, almost 7 to 1.", ">>{ArniePie} : I do see in most polls that Johnson wins more Republicans than Democrats, but he does best among independents, which is probably why Clinton's lead drops when Johnson is included in the polls. I don't know where you're getting your 2 to 1 number, and especially your 7 to 1.", ">>{Thecalculatorman} : >He's too rational to sway Republican voters. For some reason I just laughed out loud for real when I read this. Idk why I just found it really funny.", ">>{ArniePie} : While Johnson takes more Republicans than Democrats in most polls I've seen, it's his strength among independents where this metric shows up. A larger portion of the independents he wins would lean Democrat than Republican, but most of his support comes from those who truly want neither Trump or Clinton.", ">>{cylth} : More likely because the GOP has found Clinton to align more closely to their ideas than even Johnson. Because she isn't liberal at all.", ">>{ConceptualTrap} : > no one has ever or will ever care about that Times are changing. The second Clinton goes against the platform in place is the second she's going to get lambasted by Bernie supporters on social media and progressive news outlets like TYT. Now, while these outlets aren't the main stream media, what percentage of millennial voters do you think are actually getting their news from that source? Any deviation to the platform that Sanders helped make is going to come back and bite Clinton in the ass in 4 years when she is, inevitably, back to a heated primary battle against a progressive. If it's not Sanders again, it'll be someone that strongly backed Sanders.", '>>{Uptight_Kraut} : She was one of the more liberal Senators, but keep living in your own reality.', '>>{cylth} : Tell that to Honduras, to Libya, and to the millions of black Americans in the prison system because of her husbands criminal "justice" overhaul or the ones negatively affected by welfare "reform" during her husband\'s presidency (and whose actions she condoned). You know, all those "superpredators." Tell that to the pharmaceutical companies (who have donated more to her than anyone else) and to all the businesses who have donated to her and influenced the state department when she was SoS. Tell that to all the elites and corporations who just love trade deals that fuck over 90% of the population. So progressive of her, looking out for the top 0.1% and not us peasants.', ">>{captain_blackadder} : They're constantly (in pretty much every post they make) defending Clinton, hates Trump, and are telling people not to vote 3rd party because 3rd party = a vote for Trump. Meanwhile, on the 'anti-Clinton story thread' we've got this gem: > Ugh, what a flagrant hit-piece from a right-wing rag. Posted for debunking purposes ONLY.", '>>{captain_blackadder} : > Tell that to Honduras, to Libya, You can add Haiti to that list as well.', ">>{creejay} : I hope you're not serious. Almost every single article he's posted is Anti-Clinton or trashes Muslims. Pretty clear agenda there."], ['>>{gerberlifegrowupplan} : Holy shit, their current one is already the fastest android phone at the best price!', '>>{malcolmX_} : The only reason not to buy a product from OnePlus is their shitty customer service. Very sad for such beautiful products.', '>>{OfficialBeard} : Fastest Android phone? No its not. That honor goes to the S7 Edge.', ">>{jo-shabadoo} : That and the phone crashes when it gets even slightly hot. Need to use your phone after it's been in your pocket for a few hours? Too bad. Want to use it in any place where it's hot? No chance", ">>{kcoisaxunga} : not true at all, you should check yours... I have the display on for several hours straight, need to charge it 2-3 times a day and never crashes. It's true that the phone gets really hot sometimes, but no crashes.", '>>{Gihrenia} : Shoddy software release cycle as well, but still a lot better than other brands.', '>>{y2k2r2d2} : OP3 Has a really great feel. It feels great on hands.', '>>{gbeezy007} : S7 edge has the same processor and only 4gb of ram compared to on plus 6gb there arguably same speed. 399 for oneplus3 769 for s7 edge The Google pixel phone has a faster snapdragon 821 which is only a tad faster then the snapdragon 820 in the one plus 3 & s7 edge. I currently have a s7 edge great phone but does seem a little over priced by like 100-150 I got buy one get one free from tmobile though so I was fine with what I paid overall', '>>{OfficialBeard} : ... is no one checking the benchmarks for these devices? Why am I being downvoted? Geekbench puts the S7 Edge on top of the Android list, but 200 points behind the iPhone 7. The Pixel gets 4147. 1000+ points behind the top phones. Jesus Christ you can even find these results yourself.', ">>{Kamnnoriel_Huehuehue} : Not because a car has great results on a dyno means it will be the fastest around a track, same goes for phones, the 3 is faster than the s7 as far as I've seen.", '>>{Smokingfatdoobies} : Still rocking my OP1, I had this phone crash once since I got it shortly after release!', ">>{MisterHandagote} : I don't follow phone news closely. Isn't this a little soon?", ">>{morrispated2} : I absolutely couldn't agree more. I wanted to buy their iPhone case and they couldn't figure out a way to ship it to an address that was different from my paypal billing address. They then told me that it wasn't their problem and it was stupid that I didn't live at my paypal billing address and hung up on me. I liked the idea of them but I have never received worse customer service.", ">>{Raccoonpuncher} : People are complimenting OnePlus on their product quality, but isn't it weird to be releasing a phone just four months after their last flagship? I literally got mine on tail-end of October, and just after the return period ends I'm going to find out about the new one.", ">>{apolea} : >8 GB of ram While you're at it, why don't you throw in an i7 and a GTX 1080. I never understood why people need more than 4 gigs of ram for a phone. Even 4 seems kind of overkill. 3 is where the sweet spot is at", ">>{JamoJustReddit} : Your phone is probably defective. My oneplus 3 only runs hot when I'm playing an intensive game on it. It never crashes.", '>>{RenegadeUK} : If you are in the UK, you can buy from O2 and then deal with their customer service instead.', '>>{ronic025} : OMG, it sucks to be one who has recently had OnePlus Three shipped. I think I should not to open the package and see what happens on the 15th, especially how much the upgrade will cost.', ">>{cuddlepuncher} : I want to like oneplus because they do a lot of things right, but some of the stuff they do is just confusing. Their method of success was top specs for a very affordable price. They have slowly been increasing prices since the op1. They have reduced the battery capacity. They got rid of invites but the op3 is never in stock anyway and now they're releasing a new phone less than 6 months after their last. At a rumored even higher price. Oneplus, this is what I want. Fill the body out with more battery. Screw dash charge, I want standard quick charging compatibility. 6GB is plenty, 64GB is plenty, 1080p is plenty. Keep the price the same or reduce it and release nougat and keep it to to date. Then release the op4 next year.", '>>{erix84} : Yeah, took FOREVER to get Marshmallow on my OPX, but it did fix a lot of issues i had with the phone. Better late than never i guess.', ">>{jsagold} : Almost completely with you cuddlepuncher, but I've got to shout for dash charge - it's saved me multiple times!", ">>{cuddlepuncher} : Yeah, dash charge is pretty cool, but i don't think it's worth the incompatibility with all other quick charging and cables. I would rather be able to buy other chargers/cables/battery packs or borrow someone else's and still be able to get quick charging. Oneplus isn't popular enough for anyone else I know to have a dash charger and cable. And having only one manufacturer making the chargers and cables worries me too once the device gets older.", ">>{feline_lunacy} : I've had a very good experience with their customer service. The additional back cover for my OP2 didn't fit properly and I was sent a new one after giving them a link to the imgur album of the fault.", ">>{sr_grey} : I used to own the s7 and the note7 both are a pc of crop and slow down after you use it for a few weeks. I now own the OP3 and its way better than any other phone I've ever had. Don't go off of those numbers", ">>{Cthulos} : Please have expandable memory this time. It would be nice to be able to actually bring my music with me. I live in Canada where we don't have access to unlimited data plans. For now, I'll probably be sticking with my One M8 until it fails.", ">>{malcolmX_} : Sure this isn't even a considerable problem. What I'm saying is problems with battery or problem with any other part of the phone which can't be fixed like you back cover was. If that's the case you'll have to ship the phone over a quiet long distance and will need to pay lots of transport costs. I didnt even mention the shipping duration which is hugh mungus.", ">>{pewnflap} : Perfect. Myself and my girlfriend are still using our Oneplus Ones. I just changed the USB port on my girlfriends because it was acting up. Hopefully we can score some used Onplus 3's for a decent price in a few months.", ">>{Fantastins} : Still getting timely software support as well? I am still rocking a Sammy note 3 only because of the development community. Samsung supported it to 5.0.1, Yet its hardware will run nougat fine and is currently on marshmallow note 7 software with very few issues. The note 4 is the only replacement unit I've found that doesn't take away features.", '>>{pooo_under_looo} : Please have my babies, Carl Pei. *please*!', ">>{UpHandsome} : Don't know about the other guy but I am on cyanogenmod and I get updates every day.", '>>{1802ben} : I have been considering buying a OnePlus phone. People that have them are the worth it?', '>>{Mr_Brown_Pants} : here I am still using my OPO ... no problems with it. Although I noticed it sucks at keeping a connection with BT device.', '>>{Smokingfatdoobies} : yup, get updates on the reg, currently running 6.0.1 Cyanogen OS. Probably gonna pull the trigger and get the OP4, cant beat what OP offers for the money!', ">>{dmnw0w} : I love my OnePlus 3 to death, hands down the best phone I've ever used. I wouldn't swap it for anything else on the market, even ignoring the price,", '>>{Fantastins} : May be a OP3T next week, 4 could be a wait.', '>>{Raccoonpuncher} : A budget phone with a better processor than their current flagship?', ">>{dion_starfire} : I liked mine until the fingerprint sensor suddenly died one night. Didn't get it wet, didn't do anything special. Went to sleep one night with it working, woke up to it not. A bit of research on XDA shows that it's a common problem due to a manufacturing defect (the daughterboard the sensor plugs into isn't properly grounded). Having to use my phone without a home button has soured my opinion of OnePlus a bit.", '>>{AhsanMoin} : They should cover more counties, and improve the OS performance.', ">>{light24bulbs} : A lot of that is because Samsung's software and drivers are really bad.", ">>{ConsentingPenguin} : Is the warranty process still a nightmare to deal with? My Oneplus One quickly developed issues with the digitizer. Everything I read about the process of getting them to repair it seemed like a ridiculous waste of time, so I didn't even bother.", ">>{whatnow00} : chinese phones are being released very quickly right now. the mi5s just came out and now the mi6 is coming out in 2 months. i think they're on a 6 month release cycle right now.", '>>{gbeezy007} : Others have said it but Benchmarks dont mean Much as you think there good for Guideline estimates and thats about it. Especially only geekbench that doesnt account for other parts of the phone like if the storage is slow or not which makes a huge difference hence why SSD in computers is big now. at the END of the Day the Onepuls and s7 have the same exact processor Hardware wise. and you can buy almost 2 for the price of 1 yes the software or themal limits lower the oneplus a little but it does not justify the price', '>>{KMGritz} : Anyone have an idea of a vague time frame when this might go on sale? Been trying to order an OP3 to arrive by xmas (3 week delivery afaik for Ireland) for the last 3 weeks.', ">>{whoaiswho} : I don't know, seems likely that the OPO won't get the Nougat update.", ">>{dmnw0w} : The point of Dash is that it charges your phone super quickly without heating the phone, which does wonders to prevent battery degradation. Other fast charging standards can't do that.", ">>{cuddlepuncher} : Yes, I understand the point of it. It is a cool solution. But I still would rather have compatibility with the vast majority of chargers and cables. Even if the alternatives aren't quite as fast or cool.", ">>{justastocksrt4} : Can someone pm me a good link for a root? I have a note three that's just been laying around and would like to root it on a good set of firmware.", '>>{x-w-j} : I bought Note 4 when Note 7 was in fire to replace my Note 3', ">>{TurboChewy} : If they keep up this fast release cycle, basically every few months a slightly better phone, basically they're disrupting the traditional cycle and allowing people to consider their phones any time of year. You don't have to get the *best* version, just get the current one and it'll be fine. Even if you get that next one, there'll be another new one soon after. Personally I hope they keep up the fast release cycle, it adds more variety."]]

classify and reply

['>>{Positive_pressure} : For real progressives, Jill Stein is now the only choice', '>>{JustaBlueCollarMan} : Trump Is Now Preparing Executive Orders to Review All 14 U.S. Trade Deals', ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : I'd vote Johnson over stein. She seems like a fruitcake.", '>>{Luddites4Stein} : Come on /u/Positive_Pressure a 4 day old opinion article? Have you already run out of Stein posts to spam that can at least masquerade as news?', ">>{Notbythehairofmychyn} : Yes, let's create more uncertainty in global trade! Also, a waste of limited resources, when it could be spent negotiating new free trade deals. And in typical Trump fashion, needlessly pissing off American allies*. *Countries with bilateral and multilateral trade agreements with the US: Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Jordan, Mexico, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, Panama, Peru, Singapore and South Korea.", '>>{tallsails} : Watch the markets on this one. I kinda liked the 401k doubling under Obama', ">>{its_buster_cherry} : But guys!!! The art of the deal!!! It can't *possibly* get any worse", '>>{vootator} : Translation: Trump to restructure US Trade Deals so that they put more money into his pockets at the expense of those who voted him into office.', '>>{Ximitar} : Nonsense! America is run by *white* people! Better! The best! The Best People™! Chavez was a ruthless fat populist with delusions of grandeur...Trump is *nothing* like him! Wait a minute... ...damn.', '>>{thatpj} : Polling at less 1% in Ohio. Thanks for playing.', '>>{hcregna} : Real progressives sounds so pretentious. Is pragmatism now the enemy of progress? I certainly hope not.', ">>{pseudolocus} : To be honest I'm hoping for a downturn. I got my money out, and the billionaires need a bitchslapping.", ">>{Positive_pressure} : You don't have to follow me in every link I submit.", ">>{justkjfrost} : That's gonna destabilize the markets and american industry. One might suspect that's why he's doing it, mind you", ">>{SantaHickeys} : He really isn't qualified to judge the value of a trade deal, and neither are the people he brought in...", '>>{tallsails} : I am as advised to stay in. Trump will either pass pro business legislation or nothing. Which is fine for Wall Street. Hence the Dow', '>>{Chewwaka} : /u/Positive_Pressure does nothing but spam Jilly propaganda all day, every day. Their desperation is just sad at this point.', '>>{cratermoon} : So real progressives believe vaccines cause autism and wifi makes you sick?', ">>{RadicalNonComformist} : Can we please talk about how crazy Ajamu Baraka is, Jill Stein's running mate? I keep posting about this. He called Obama an Uncle Tom, and said this of *Charlie Hebdo* > In this larger context, Charlie Hebdo’s blatant disregard and disrespect for another religion, shielded by an absolute commitment to freedom of speech that gives them blanket immunity, is now compounded by the “Je Suis Charlie campaign,” orchestrated in the name of upholding the values of liberal, Western civilization. > [....] > In short, Je Suis Charlie has become an arrogant rallying cry for white supremacy… (source; http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2016/08/steins-vp-pick-called-support-for-charlie-hebdo-victims-white-supremacy/) I also recommend [this video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBQ3mv45oqA), by David Packman. I like a lot of Jill Stein's ideas, but she seems like too much of an ideologue, and I am more skeptical of her since her lunatic of a VP nominee. Also keep in mind, neither one these candidates have held office higher than a town council member.", '>>{Qunidaye} : I awoke drenched in sweat. I had dreamed about praising vaccines. What if I had talked in my sleep? I will be extra energetic at the green party struggle session tonight, no one must suspect my counter-progressive thoughts.', '>>{kuss51292} : Only if you believe the nonsense that Jill is an anti-vaxxer or even anti-science.', '>>{Super_Happy_Fun_Time} : That batty old fuck? No way in hell.', '>>{kuss51292} : [hmmmm](http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/08/19/roaming-charges-prime-time-green/) >If you have a lot of Facebook friends, you may have recently noticed a high level of activity on your Facebook feed by Jill Stein acolytes. >If so, you may find the following links useful to throw them off their game. No warranty, express or implied. You don’t have to prove that Jill Stein is an anti-science conspiracy theorist. You just have to say, “There are unanswered questions about whether Jill Stein is an anti-science conspiracy theorist.” [also this](https://youtu.be/QTpz2XBGce0)', '>>{cratermoon} : The whole "why hasn\'t so-and-so denied such-and-such" is definitely a sleazy strategy, but in this case there was no implication about conspiracy theories. It\'s simply the case that Dr. Stein\'s comments about vaccines and wifi demonstrate at a minimum pandering to these anti-science interests. These interests may or may not include wingnut conspiracy theorists, but Dr. Stein, to date, has not embraced that extreme end.', ">>{kuss51292} : Yeah but she had not once tried to make the connection between vaccines and autism, like most anti-vaxxers **at minimum**, try to establish. I don't get how someone that continuously says she's for vaccinations and described it's benefits of treating measles and polio is somehow an anti-vaxxer based on a few comments that she has recently cleared up. As for the WiFi thing, I could really care less about it, as should you, because it's really a **non-issue** when it comes to politics. EDIT: http://www.inquisitr.com/3444426/jill-stein-is-not-anti-science-you-blithering-idiots/"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{JustaBlueCollarMan} : Trump Is Now Preparing Executive Orders to Review All 14 U.S. Trade Deals', ">>{Notbythehairofmychyn} : Yes, let's create more uncertainty in global trade! Also, a waste of limited resources, when it could be spent negotiating new free trade deals. And in typical Trump fashion, needlessly pissing off American allies*. *Countries with bilateral and multilateral trade agreements with the US: Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Jordan, Mexico, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, Panama, Peru, Singapore and South Korea.", '>>{tallsails} : Watch the markets on this one. I kinda liked the 401k doubling under Obama', ">>{its_buster_cherry} : But guys!!! The art of the deal!!! It can't *possibly* get any worse", '>>{vootator} : Translation: Trump to restructure US Trade Deals so that they put more money into his pockets at the expense of those who voted him into office.', '>>{Ximitar} : Nonsense! America is run by *white* people! Better! The best! The Best People™! Chavez was a ruthless fat populist with delusions of grandeur...Trump is *nothing* like him! Wait a minute... ...damn.', ">>{pseudolocus} : To be honest I'm hoping for a downturn. I got my money out, and the billionaires need a bitchslapping.", ">>{justkjfrost} : That's gonna destabilize the markets and american industry. One might suspect that's why he's doing it, mind you", ">>{SantaHickeys} : He really isn't qualified to judge the value of a trade deal, and neither are the people he brought in...", '>>{tallsails} : I am as advised to stay in. Trump will either pass pro business legislation or nothing. Which is fine for Wall Street. Hence the Dow'], ['>>{Positive_pressure} : For real progressives, Jill Stein is now the only choice', ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : I'd vote Johnson over stein. She seems like a fruitcake.", '>>{Luddites4Stein} : Come on /u/Positive_Pressure a 4 day old opinion article? Have you already run out of Stein posts to spam that can at least masquerade as news?', '>>{thatpj} : Polling at less 1% in Ohio. Thanks for playing.', '>>{hcregna} : Real progressives sounds so pretentious. Is pragmatism now the enemy of progress? I certainly hope not.', ">>{Positive_pressure} : You don't have to follow me in every link I submit.", '>>{Chewwaka} : /u/Positive_Pressure does nothing but spam Jilly propaganda all day, every day. Their desperation is just sad at this point.', '>>{cratermoon} : So real progressives believe vaccines cause autism and wifi makes you sick?', ">>{RadicalNonComformist} : Can we please talk about how crazy Ajamu Baraka is, Jill Stein's running mate? I keep posting about this. He called Obama an Uncle Tom, and said this of *Charlie Hebdo* > In this larger context, Charlie Hebdo’s blatant disregard and disrespect for another religion, shielded by an absolute commitment to freedom of speech that gives them blanket immunity, is now compounded by the “Je Suis Charlie campaign,” orchestrated in the name of upholding the values of liberal, Western civilization. > [....] > In short, Je Suis Charlie has become an arrogant rallying cry for white supremacy… (source; http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2016/08/steins-vp-pick-called-support-for-charlie-hebdo-victims-white-supremacy/) I also recommend [this video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBQ3mv45oqA), by David Packman. I like a lot of Jill Stein's ideas, but she seems like too much of an ideologue, and I am more skeptical of her since her lunatic of a VP nominee. Also keep in mind, neither one these candidates have held office higher than a town council member.", '>>{Qunidaye} : I awoke drenched in sweat. I had dreamed about praising vaccines. What if I had talked in my sleep? I will be extra energetic at the green party struggle session tonight, no one must suspect my counter-progressive thoughts.', '>>{kuss51292} : Only if you believe the nonsense that Jill is an anti-vaxxer or even anti-science.', '>>{Super_Happy_Fun_Time} : That batty old fuck? No way in hell.', '>>{kuss51292} : [hmmmm](http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/08/19/roaming-charges-prime-time-green/) >If you have a lot of Facebook friends, you may have recently noticed a high level of activity on your Facebook feed by Jill Stein acolytes. >If so, you may find the following links useful to throw them off their game. No warranty, express or implied. You don’t have to prove that Jill Stein is an anti-science conspiracy theorist. You just have to say, “There are unanswered questions about whether Jill Stein is an anti-science conspiracy theorist.” [also this](https://youtu.be/QTpz2XBGce0)', '>>{cratermoon} : The whole "why hasn\'t so-and-so denied such-and-such" is definitely a sleazy strategy, but in this case there was no implication about conspiracy theories. It\'s simply the case that Dr. Stein\'s comments about vaccines and wifi demonstrate at a minimum pandering to these anti-science interests. These interests may or may not include wingnut conspiracy theorists, but Dr. Stein, to date, has not embraced that extreme end.', ">>{kuss51292} : Yeah but she had not once tried to make the connection between vaccines and autism, like most anti-vaxxers **at minimum**, try to establish. I don't get how someone that continuously says she's for vaccinations and described it's benefits of treating measles and polio is somehow an anti-vaxxer based on a few comments that she has recently cleared up. As for the WiFi thing, I could really care less about it, as should you, because it's really a **non-issue** when it comes to politics. EDIT: http://www.inquisitr.com/3444426/jill-stein-is-not-anti-science-you-blithering-idiots/"]]

classify and reply

[">>{mattdmkim} : Precisely the reason why Democrats lost this election. Don't these fools realize how they sound when they run their mouths like this? They are losing white votes faster than the Hispanics are growing. And non-Hispanic whites are still over 70% of the electorate.", ">>{mortfeinberg} : anti-SJW subs which were mainly liberal until this election have been saying this for years. SJWs are going to cause severe damage to this country and the democratic party if they aren't rebuked. Their brand of identity politics is toxic and does absolutely nothing but make any fights for equality harder and less likely to succeed. The DNC needs to seriously tell SJWs to fuck right off and never come back.", ">>{alizure1} : We don't need power hungry people leading the democrats. We don't need people who have NO earthly idea what its like for a regular person to live in this country. We don't need people who would rather sit on their asses while people in standing rock get killed while peacefully protesting something that we ALL should be protesting. We don't need democrats who cozy up to bail out banks, yet at the same time, can't help students get a good college education. We don't need democrats who start wars just to make a profit. And yes i know the republicans are doing it to. Which is why sometimes its hard to see the difference between the two parties. It doesn't matter what color skin a person is born with, if a person can do the job and lead the democrats in a way that is helpful to ALL people. Then that person should be the one to lead.", ">>{alizure1} : I think there is a time to speak out against things. But, some of those SJW's are just terrible.Not EVERYTHING is about race. Nor is it always about gender. People will never work together, as long as hate like this is being amplified.", '>>{_ValentineMSmith_} : What a clown. Good luck winning elections when you spurn 70% of the population. This woman should learn a little bit about math.', ">>{mattdmkim} : Yep, and I honestly thought that the Sanders camp was the non-SJW faction of the DNC - looks like I was wrong. The entire party is infected with identity politics, and it's only a matter of whether you emphasize gender (Clinton) or race (Sanders). I simply do not understand the utter tone-deafness of divisive rhetoric like this. In polite & professional company, it's taboo to even mention race. And yet these fools are talking about stuff like 'We don't need no white people here' on national television? And I'm not even white. Christ.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : I don't understand why so many people are against this. White people have led the Democratic Party ever since this country began. Why would it be so wrong to let minorities lead it for once? Why don't minorities deserve to be in positions of power?", '>>{WigginIII} : Terrible statement from this rep. You need to appeal to *all* americans. Not just black, not just brown, not just women, not just young, etc. Focus on issues that affect all of these groups, and perhaps use specific surrogates or advertising to explain how your goals will positively affect those groups. But so long as white people are the majority voting block in this country (and they are by a *wide* margin) you need to be as vanilla as possible.', '>>{alizure1} : The way this is worded, it is reverse racism. And should not be tolerated.', '>>{Jaspion0} : This woman is a clown. Enough of these SJW idiots. They took about equality non stop and yet they keep labeling and divining people all the time. We need a serious Dem party.', ">>{infinite_blurghs} : So minorities shouldn't be allowed to have their voices be heard? They should just sit back patiently as white people continue to take positions of power? You really see nothing wrong with that mindset?", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : But they've been trying to get there on merit for centuries now. The fact that you want to pretend that racism isn't a huge part of the issue of why there aren't more minorities in positions of power right now says a lot about you, and about your apparent desire to let racism continue, rather than trying to actually do something about it.", '>>{MenicusMoldbug} : I hope they pick the same minorities that ran Detroit.', '>>{eatmycupcake} : Bear in mind that the article says "former" spokesperson and remember that Sanders called for an end to identity politics in the Democratic party, for which he was recently slammed.', '>>{kiarra33} : yeah he said that two days ago is he backtracking?', '>>{cl33t} : > "In my opinion, we don\'t need white people leading the Democratic Party right now," Symone Sanders told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. Is she is calling for Sanders to step down from his new leadership position?', ">>{eatmycupcake} : I haven't seen anything to indicate that, but I'm also too busy to stay up to the minute on this stuff, so it bears looking at I suppose.", '>>{infinite_blurghs} : Very few people in this country are going to willingly vote for a politician who\'s a minority, especially in this day and age, when [racism is slowly becoming more and more normalized.](http://time.com/4569129/racist-anti-semitic-incidents-donald-trump/) (As recently as last year, Congress was ["80 percent white, 80 percent male and 92 percent Christian."](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/01/05/the-new-congress-is-80-percent-white-80-percent-male-and-92-percent-christian/)) So why would it be so wrong to allow minorities to have a bit of a leg up in some sort of affirmative action program that helped them get into political positions?', '>>{alizure1} : I am not saying that at ALL. All i am saying is the job should go to who ever can do the job the best. It has nothing to do with the color of their skin. Nor, does it have anything to do with their gender.', '>>{infinite_blurghs} : But discrimination often plays a part in who gets the job, and you seem to be unwilling to face that fact.', ">>{alizure1} : On the contrary. I do accept that fact. I just know, that it shouldn't be a part of who gets a job. As I said, race nor gender should hold no key in determining who gets a particular job and who doesn't. I thought I made that apparent. And the apparent wording of the article is indeed racist. But because it says that no white person should hold the office of leader in the DNC I shouldn't say its racist. When in fact it is? Isn't that what racism is? To discriminate against someone simply for the color of their skin, religion, sexual orientation etc?", '>>{infinite_blurghs} : You know, I\'m disabled (I have Asperger\'s Syndrome), and that makes me a horrible candidate for most jobs. So do you think that I should live the rest of my life in poverty, or will you admit that affirmative action programs (including those that help the disabled) exist for a reason? What if the article had said that there should be less "able" people in politics, and more disabled people? Would you still find fault with that statement?', ">>{alizure1} : I have explained my stance. I don't think your understanding where i'm coming from. And i am sorry that you feel that way. But, i say yet again, the job no matter what it is, should go to the person/people who can do it best. No matter their race, gender, etc. I don't think i can put it more simply than that.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : But I can't do most jobs well. So where does that leave me?", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : Hillary Clinton tried to pursue a political position, and you see where that got her: she had to face a shit-ton of misogyny and ended up losing the position to a completely unqualified man. So what makes you think that doing away with affirmative action programs is a good idea at all? Face it, there's far too much hatred in society these days for affirmative action to be done away with.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : Really? Clinton didn't face much misogyny? What alternate reality have you been living in? Here, read these: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/10/fear-of-a-female-president/497564/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/10/13/trumps-misogyny-foreshadows-the-ugly-backlash-that-will-hit-clinton-if-she-wins/ https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/nov/13/trump-misogyny-didnt-win-election-will-change-womens-lives-clinton Also, why is it so wrong for people to call Trump out on his very real hatred? Would you rather that he was allowed to be as bigoted, racist, and xenophobic as he wanted without anyone being able to call him out on it? Because that sounds a lot like tyranny to me. And those emails were a complete non-issue. The FBI themselves said so. The case was closed. So why can't you shut up about that already?", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : What about the other two links? Did you even look at them? And just because someone is disliked doesn't mean that they're being disliked for a valid reason. Trump encouraged people to dislike Clinton simply because she was a woman, and his followers bought into that misogyny hook, line, and sinker. Here's even more proof: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/donald-trump-sexism-tracker-every-offensive-comment-in-one-place/ http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/news/a44629/donald-trump-insults-women/ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-sexist-quotes-comments-tweets-grab-them-by-the-pussy-when-star-you-can-do-anything-a7353006.html And again, why is it so wrong to call Trump out on his misogyny when he is, in fact, being a misogynist? Stop acting as though he should be allowed to be as hateful as he wants without having to face any sort of consequences for that behavior.", '>>{infinite_blurghs} : So basically, you don\'t care what Trump says about women? He can be as insulting as he wants towards women and you won\'t think there\'s anything wrong with that? Tell me, why do you seem to see nothing wrong with hatred? Also, what about his infamous "grab them by the pussy" remark? Do you just not care about the fact that Trump has admitted to sexually assaulting women?', '>>{infinite_blurghs} : So if a woman falsely accused a man of raping her, that wouldn\'t bother you? That\'s a lot like the way that Trump has admitted to sexually assaulting women (through his "I grabbed them by the pussy" remark), after all. That wasn\'t just "locker room talk" (or whatever his supporters are calling it), since many women have gotten up the courage to admit that he did, in fact, assault them. But that doesn\'t matter to you, does it? Yet I\'m betting that you feel quite strongly about false rape accusations, which just goes to show how much of a sexist you are. So, with that said, tell me, why should I take you seriously at all?', ">>{infinite_blurghs} : What if a man were simply claiming that a woman had falsely accused him of rape? Are you saying that you'd be more likely to believe that man, despite the fact that his claims were hearsay, than you would be to believe a woman who was accusing a man of sexually assaulting her? The fact that you'd be more prone to believing a man's claims over a woman's is entirely sexist. So why not just own up to your sexism already? If a person claims that a crime was committed against them, that person should be believed, no matter what their gender is.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : Tell me, do you even understand (or care at all about) how hard it is to admit to being raped or sexually assaulted? The fact that people like you are unwilling to trust those admissions just makes women even more unlikely to open up about them. But when Trump admitted to having sexually assaulted women, many of his victims saw that as an opportunity to come out and finally open up about the fact that he had assaulted them. They felt that, since Trump admitted to it, there was no reason why anyone would accuse them of lying. But I guess there are still plenty of assholes in the world (such as yourself), who would rather make a woman feel bad about the incredibly difficult process of admitting to being the victim of sexual assault, than actually show them some much-needed compassion by taking them at their word. Thanks for being part of the reason why so many men get away with sexual assault or rape. I sure as hell hope you're not happy about that.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : Many men get away with sexually assaulting (or raping) women due to attitudes like yours, in which the victim is treated as a potential criminal. The fact that you don't seem to care about that makes me sick."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{mattdmkim} : Precisely the reason why Democrats lost this election. Don't these fools realize how they sound when they run their mouths like this? They are losing white votes faster than the Hispanics are growing. And non-Hispanic whites are still over 70% of the electorate.", ">>{mortfeinberg} : anti-SJW subs which were mainly liberal until this election have been saying this for years. SJWs are going to cause severe damage to this country and the democratic party if they aren't rebuked. Their brand of identity politics is toxic and does absolutely nothing but make any fights for equality harder and less likely to succeed. The DNC needs to seriously tell SJWs to fuck right off and never come back.", ">>{alizure1} : We don't need power hungry people leading the democrats. We don't need people who have NO earthly idea what its like for a regular person to live in this country. We don't need people who would rather sit on their asses while people in standing rock get killed while peacefully protesting something that we ALL should be protesting. We don't need democrats who cozy up to bail out banks, yet at the same time, can't help students get a good college education. We don't need democrats who start wars just to make a profit. And yes i know the republicans are doing it to. Which is why sometimes its hard to see the difference between the two parties. It doesn't matter what color skin a person is born with, if a person can do the job and lead the democrats in a way that is helpful to ALL people. Then that person should be the one to lead.", ">>{alizure1} : I think there is a time to speak out against things. But, some of those SJW's are just terrible.Not EVERYTHING is about race. Nor is it always about gender. People will never work together, as long as hate like this is being amplified.", '>>{_ValentineMSmith_} : What a clown. Good luck winning elections when you spurn 70% of the population. This woman should learn a little bit about math.', ">>{mattdmkim} : Yep, and I honestly thought that the Sanders camp was the non-SJW faction of the DNC - looks like I was wrong. The entire party is infected with identity politics, and it's only a matter of whether you emphasize gender (Clinton) or race (Sanders). I simply do not understand the utter tone-deafness of divisive rhetoric like this. In polite & professional company, it's taboo to even mention race. And yet these fools are talking about stuff like 'We don't need no white people here' on national television? And I'm not even white. Christ.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : I don't understand why so many people are against this. White people have led the Democratic Party ever since this country began. Why would it be so wrong to let minorities lead it for once? Why don't minorities deserve to be in positions of power?", '>>{WigginIII} : Terrible statement from this rep. You need to appeal to *all* americans. Not just black, not just brown, not just women, not just young, etc. Focus on issues that affect all of these groups, and perhaps use specific surrogates or advertising to explain how your goals will positively affect those groups. But so long as white people are the majority voting block in this country (and they are by a *wide* margin) you need to be as vanilla as possible.', '>>{alizure1} : The way this is worded, it is reverse racism. And should not be tolerated.', '>>{Jaspion0} : This woman is a clown. Enough of these SJW idiots. They took about equality non stop and yet they keep labeling and divining people all the time. We need a serious Dem party.', ">>{infinite_blurghs} : So minorities shouldn't be allowed to have their voices be heard? They should just sit back patiently as white people continue to take positions of power? You really see nothing wrong with that mindset?", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : But they've been trying to get there on merit for centuries now. The fact that you want to pretend that racism isn't a huge part of the issue of why there aren't more minorities in positions of power right now says a lot about you, and about your apparent desire to let racism continue, rather than trying to actually do something about it.", '>>{MenicusMoldbug} : I hope they pick the same minorities that ran Detroit.', '>>{eatmycupcake} : Bear in mind that the article says "former" spokesperson and remember that Sanders called for an end to identity politics in the Democratic party, for which he was recently slammed.', '>>{kiarra33} : yeah he said that two days ago is he backtracking?', '>>{cl33t} : > "In my opinion, we don\'t need white people leading the Democratic Party right now," Symone Sanders told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. Is she is calling for Sanders to step down from his new leadership position?', ">>{eatmycupcake} : I haven't seen anything to indicate that, but I'm also too busy to stay up to the minute on this stuff, so it bears looking at I suppose.", '>>{infinite_blurghs} : Very few people in this country are going to willingly vote for a politician who\'s a minority, especially in this day and age, when [racism is slowly becoming more and more normalized.](http://time.com/4569129/racist-anti-semitic-incidents-donald-trump/) (As recently as last year, Congress was ["80 percent white, 80 percent male and 92 percent Christian."](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/01/05/the-new-congress-is-80-percent-white-80-percent-male-and-92-percent-christian/)) So why would it be so wrong to allow minorities to have a bit of a leg up in some sort of affirmative action program that helped them get into political positions?', '>>{alizure1} : I am not saying that at ALL. All i am saying is the job should go to who ever can do the job the best. It has nothing to do with the color of their skin. Nor, does it have anything to do with their gender.', '>>{infinite_blurghs} : But discrimination often plays a part in who gets the job, and you seem to be unwilling to face that fact.', ">>{alizure1} : On the contrary. I do accept that fact. I just know, that it shouldn't be a part of who gets a job. As I said, race nor gender should hold no key in determining who gets a particular job and who doesn't. I thought I made that apparent. And the apparent wording of the article is indeed racist. But because it says that no white person should hold the office of leader in the DNC I shouldn't say its racist. When in fact it is? Isn't that what racism is? To discriminate against someone simply for the color of their skin, religion, sexual orientation etc?", '>>{infinite_blurghs} : You know, I\'m disabled (I have Asperger\'s Syndrome), and that makes me a horrible candidate for most jobs. So do you think that I should live the rest of my life in poverty, or will you admit that affirmative action programs (including those that help the disabled) exist for a reason? What if the article had said that there should be less "able" people in politics, and more disabled people? Would you still find fault with that statement?', ">>{alizure1} : I have explained my stance. I don't think your understanding where i'm coming from. And i am sorry that you feel that way. But, i say yet again, the job no matter what it is, should go to the person/people who can do it best. No matter their race, gender, etc. I don't think i can put it more simply than that.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : But I can't do most jobs well. So where does that leave me?", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : Hillary Clinton tried to pursue a political position, and you see where that got her: she had to face a shit-ton of misogyny and ended up losing the position to a completely unqualified man. So what makes you think that doing away with affirmative action programs is a good idea at all? Face it, there's far too much hatred in society these days for affirmative action to be done away with.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : Really? Clinton didn't face much misogyny? What alternate reality have you been living in? Here, read these: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/10/fear-of-a-female-president/497564/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/10/13/trumps-misogyny-foreshadows-the-ugly-backlash-that-will-hit-clinton-if-she-wins/ https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/nov/13/trump-misogyny-didnt-win-election-will-change-womens-lives-clinton Also, why is it so wrong for people to call Trump out on his very real hatred? Would you rather that he was allowed to be as bigoted, racist, and xenophobic as he wanted without anyone being able to call him out on it? Because that sounds a lot like tyranny to me. And those emails were a complete non-issue. The FBI themselves said so. The case was closed. So why can't you shut up about that already?", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : What about the other two links? Did you even look at them? And just because someone is disliked doesn't mean that they're being disliked for a valid reason. Trump encouraged people to dislike Clinton simply because she was a woman, and his followers bought into that misogyny hook, line, and sinker. Here's even more proof: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/donald-trump-sexism-tracker-every-offensive-comment-in-one-place/ http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/news/a44629/donald-trump-insults-women/ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-sexist-quotes-comments-tweets-grab-them-by-the-pussy-when-star-you-can-do-anything-a7353006.html And again, why is it so wrong to call Trump out on his misogyny when he is, in fact, being a misogynist? Stop acting as though he should be allowed to be as hateful as he wants without having to face any sort of consequences for that behavior.", '>>{infinite_blurghs} : So basically, you don\'t care what Trump says about women? He can be as insulting as he wants towards women and you won\'t think there\'s anything wrong with that? Tell me, why do you seem to see nothing wrong with hatred? Also, what about his infamous "grab them by the pussy" remark? Do you just not care about the fact that Trump has admitted to sexually assaulting women?', '>>{infinite_blurghs} : So if a woman falsely accused a man of raping her, that wouldn\'t bother you? That\'s a lot like the way that Trump has admitted to sexually assaulting women (through his "I grabbed them by the pussy" remark), after all. That wasn\'t just "locker room talk" (or whatever his supporters are calling it), since many women have gotten up the courage to admit that he did, in fact, assault them. But that doesn\'t matter to you, does it? Yet I\'m betting that you feel quite strongly about false rape accusations, which just goes to show how much of a sexist you are. So, with that said, tell me, why should I take you seriously at all?', ">>{infinite_blurghs} : What if a man were simply claiming that a woman had falsely accused him of rape? Are you saying that you'd be more likely to believe that man, despite the fact that his claims were hearsay, than you would be to believe a woman who was accusing a man of sexually assaulting her? The fact that you'd be more prone to believing a man's claims over a woman's is entirely sexist. So why not just own up to your sexism already? If a person claims that a crime was committed against them, that person should be believed, no matter what their gender is.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : Tell me, do you even understand (or care at all about) how hard it is to admit to being raped or sexually assaulted? The fact that people like you are unwilling to trust those admissions just makes women even more unlikely to open up about them. But when Trump admitted to having sexually assaulted women, many of his victims saw that as an opportunity to come out and finally open up about the fact that he had assaulted them. They felt that, since Trump admitted to it, there was no reason why anyone would accuse them of lying. But I guess there are still plenty of assholes in the world (such as yourself), who would rather make a woman feel bad about the incredibly difficult process of admitting to being the victim of sexual assault, than actually show them some much-needed compassion by taking them at their word. Thanks for being part of the reason why so many men get away with sexual assault or rape. I sure as hell hope you're not happy about that.", ">>{infinite_blurghs} : Many men get away with sexually assaulting (or raping) women due to attitudes like yours, in which the victim is treated as a potential criminal. The fact that you don't seem to care about that makes me sick."]]

classify and reply

['>>{HowITrulyFeel} : Trump kills TPP, giving China its first big win', ">>{NathanBrittles} : 'Trump's Islamophobia' HuffPo is going to stay a butt hurt rageoholic for quite some time. It's funny to watch.", '>>{johnmountain} : Marsha Blackburn’s solution to fake news is really bad - She believes that internet service providers should be responsible for scrubbing the internet of fake news', '>>{CWApawn} : TPP aside (which I do not care for myself), why do you feel that Globalism is bad?', '>>{Baygo22} : Its a flowchart being followed... Did Trump do it? Yes: It is bad, criticize it.', '>>{minercrafter2} : dae (((globalists)))???', '>>{IbanezDavy} : How come no one else thinks Comcast sucks balls??? - Comcast users in 2020', '>>{Publius_Jr} : I bet she also thinks Verizon should stop people from having phone sex.', '>>{Mr_Hashtag} : Tennessean checking in. Marsha Blackburn only deals in really bad solutions.', ">>{Qunidaye} : Globalism has become a code word for (((JEWS))). I don't think all these nuts are up in arms about comparative advantage or supply chains.", '>>{2ndprize} : Why were they carrying around Trump surrogates on the Clinton bus?', ">>{amazingoopah} : Well, that does it I'm not voting for the bus driver for President.", '>>{ggyujjhi} : These are Muslim Americans, dumb-asses, not Syrian refugees that are inadequately vetted.', '>>{Desi_US} : I hope you apply the same standards to Christian fanatics.', ">>{dirtfarmingcanuck} : Yep we'll get right to business implementing a comprehensive program to put an end to that one guy that bombed an abortion clinic in the 80s. I don't care about Westboro Baptist Church. They're dumb as fuck but they haven't cut any heads off yet.", '>>{dirtfarmingcanuck} : Yes, CNN told me Pence wants to put an end to the separation of church and state.', '>>{minercrafter2} : One of the few good things Trump has done.', '>>{roboboogienights} : Talk about building walls. Great American Firewall is on its way.', '>>{beezoaram} : And what is her foolproof method for deciding what information is true and what is fake? To creationists information about evolution is fake.', '>>{frackpot} : I have it from a reliable source they were just unloading some trumpettes that snuck on board.', ">>{victorged} : Well, I guess? I've stated my position that killing the TPP was bad policy for months in this sub, and even called it a win for China a couple weeks ago when Taiwan was still a hot topic, but let's not pretend I'm the average American voter here WaPo. Sanders supporters were anti-TPP, Trump supporters were anti-TPP, and most Clinton supporters were anti-TPP. About the only people who ever really wanted it in America were Obama and possibly Boehner. Neither one holds political office anymore. This one is a win for Trump in fulfilling his campaign promises, and as bad an idea as I personally have always thought it was, the American people were pretty damn explicit on this one. Not fair to mark that particular scorecard against Trump.", ">>{victorged} : If you're absolutely convinced it was going to be detrimental to America, sure. But Trump essentially just handed a victory in control of trade in the Southeast Asian region to the Chinese RCEP Trade Agreeement. The US just forfeited massive amounts of leverage in that region, look to some of what Alexander Downer had to say on BBC this morning, there's already groundswell in Australia and Indonesia to shift to a more Chinese centric trade policy. Trump handed over a lot of leverage and influence for absolutely nothing, and he gave an awful lot of it to China. Unless you're absolutely convinced this deal was horrific for America, that's a bitter pill to swallow.", ">>{BuckDoe} : No way. That's the only kind she gets.", '>>{LordPantyhorn} : Waste? Was it former Ga. congressman Jack Kingston?', '>>{AgoraiosBum} : Ok. Best headline. Good work, USA Today.', ">>{RepelGropers} : I know you have never fired a loaded gun at someone. If you had, you wouldn't speak like that.", ">>{magicsonar} : Explain how reducing free trade is a big win for the US? It's good to think through your assumptions. :)", ">>{dirtfarmingcanuck} : I'm not being even remotely serious. That's how bad the left is though, I guess, that people can't even tell.", '>>{Huck77} : Censorship is not the answer. Censorship threatens freedom. The answer is that we have to become more responsible consumers of information.', '>>{peadith} : It\'s not funny because the only reason people get on the net for real news is they can\'t get it on TV. News papers are dead not just because they stink, are dirty, and always a day late, but because people who can easily read say "WTF is this bullshit." just by glancing at the front page. With absolutely zero reference, how does anyone know the truth until a bunch of people who actually know it complain about the fakes? Service providers don\'t know squat except how much they charge for some data moved, and whatever else their lawyers say they can do.', '>>{soggylittleshrimp} : > This sub is complete shit. Thank you come again', '>>{sloppyjoes7} : A "phobia" is an **unfounded** fear of something. I think it\'s rational to be wary of terrorist Muslim attacks.', ">>{YourBlogSucksToo} : Why? Because you don't like a viewpoint someone shared and are incapable of countering it with facts?", '>>{cyclopsrex} : All three networks have news programing. CNN, MSNBC, Fox, BBC. There is really quite a lot of news.', ">>{malpais} : Guiz! I don't know if youve been on reddit in the last couple hours, but in case you didn't know: * Clinton Campaign Bus Dumping 'Human Waste' On Side of GA Road (freebeacon.com) * Witness: DNC tour bus dumps human waste into storm drain (cbs46.com) * Democratic campaign bus caught dumping sewage into storm drain (nydailynews.com) * Clinton Campaign Bus Caught Dumping Human Waste In Georgia, HAZMAT Team Called In (youtube.com) * DNC tour bus dumps human waste into storm drains (cbs46.com) * DNC apologizes after campaign bus dumps sewage on Georgia street (11alive.com) * Hillary Clinton campaign bus dumps sewage on Gwinnett County street (11alive.com) * Ga. police investigating Dem campaign bus for dumping human waste (thehill.com) * Clinton campaign bus seen dumping human waste into storm water drain. (wsbtv.com) * Hillary campaign bus craps all over Atlanta suburb (nypost.com) * Police: DNC bus seen dumping sewage near storm drain (fox5atlanta.com) * DNC campaign bus dumps human waste in Gwinnett (ajc.com) BTW - Did you know that Trumps campaign is completely floundering and that he's got less than a 20% chance of winning?", '>>{UMR-san} : Oh a brigade, cool. Now to get some of that upvotes! Hitler was right.', '>>{Endorn} : He said *real* news. All of those networks push their own agenda and their news is slated because of that. MSNBC is owned by Comcast for example which donated TONS of cash to the Clinton campaign. Corporate networks also rely on getting interviews with politicians to keep rarings up so not making politicians angry is their top priority as opposed to telling the truth or breaking a story.', '>>{75962410687} : Why does the US need economic leverage over the entire planet?', ">>{foolmanchoo} : Merry Christmas! [Shitter's Full!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeskbiJjCXI)", '>>{YourBlogSucksToo} : Because this isn\'t a big win for the United States. It\'s status quo for the United States, and offers China a chance to develop their *own* "big win" that we are now powerless to influence *slow clap* well done', ">>{random4893} : I think it's pretty fair to criticize him for doing something that primarily benefits a country he owes hundreds of millions of dollars to.", ">>{YourBlogSucksToo} : While I can agree that, in general, this is Trump responding to the pressure of his base, he is now President of the United States. All the shit that happened on Obama's watch that the right reamed him for is now in his tiny little hands.", ">>{TheApatheist} : I will bite: the western middle class is the only loser in globalization, having their leverage decimated by easier competition from abroad with lower wage demands. The same reason gender equality hurt men's salaries and the EU hurts leverage for Western European worker compared to the Eastern ones. The great equalizer it is, except for an escaping elite. Equalization sucks however if you came from the advantaged position.", '>>{SantaHickeys} : Its not fringe to recognize that all cable outlets have shown a bias toward mainstream candidates', ">>{cyclopsrex} : Yeah, they didn't give Jill Stein enough time for you?", '>>{Stuckinaloop} : The sad thing is. Any bus could do this in San Francisco. Then no one would notice the difference due to all of the shit on the sidewalk.', '>>{Quinnjester} : Does everything becomes a story now? Unbelievable. If Clinton farts will that make the MSM?', '>>{Lorenzo_Canyon} : Wait till you hear what Dave Matthews Band did.', ">>{danishanus} : Yea if you're Muslim you should be wary of neo nazis attacks too", ">>{commieflirt} : Otherwise we'd have some Chinese fellow instead of Bill Gates saving all the kids in Africa", '>>{sloppyjoes7} : Yes, all those Neo Nazi attacks you hear about on the news. Did you hear about their last attack that killed hundreds or thousands? ...No?', '>>{katamario} : This comment is both civil and productive! (/s)', '>>{KaijinDV} : You mean the same Syrian refugees who are going through the most stringent vetting process the US (possibly the world) has ever seen? http://time.com/4116619/syrian-refugees-screening-process/', '>>{Mr_Hashtag} : Circling back around to this post more than two weeks later to say ... [see?](http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/republican-congresswoman-marsha-blackburn-s-obamacare-twitter-poll-backfires-n703271)', ">>{victorged} : I guess technically it doesn't, but the mroe trade is flowing through your country the more GDP you're likely to generate. This is the big divide between how I look at NAFTA or other trade deals versus how the major political campaigns looked at trade deals. Free flow of goods and GDP *exploded* in North America, and between Canada, the US, and Mexico more trade passes than nearly anywhere else on Earth (RCEP is slightly larger on the whole) intra-Bloc trade soared 41%. It should be viewed as one of the great successes in economic history. http://restud.oxfordjournals.org/content/82/1/1 Unfortunately, the drawbacks are a lot easier to focus on; American manufacturing workforce has dropped by nearly half, even if productivity and real value are up, and it's difficult for the average layman to separate out the effects of increased automation from increased offshoring. Welfare is up, and while some of that may be due to recession lag, it's likely free trade plays a role. In short, NAFTA made an awful lot of people incredibly rich, possibly without them even knowing, but it left people behind too. I view a lot of what's going on now as overreaction, like the US Isolationist streak between World Wars I & II, we saw damage and are trying to keep it at arm's length, but I'm a long way from convinced we're escaping globalization, and I'd rather we write the rulebook than someone else.", ">>{KaijinDV} : Then I guess Hillary would be wrong, wouldn't she champ?", '>>{omeow} : >Why does the US need economic leverage over the entire planet? Because economic leverage is far more beneficial to everyone than maintaining unsustainable millitary leverage. Without any leverage US will be just another rich western country with lot of enemies.', ">>{victorged} : Internationally? Positive. It's a straight up renege on years worth of negotiation and we've left a dozen or so Southeast Asian countries in a lurch. That's not going to help any of our negotiations going forward. Domestically is a tougher picture. This will definitely be a popular move nearly universally, and given his lagging favorability numbers and active dissent he needs all of those he can get. Does this translate into meaningful political capital? Possibly, and if so it's entirely plausible that it makes the move worthwhile in the world of team Trump admin so that they can go after something bigger / more controversial. If that's the case I'll have to reassess when I see it happen.", ">>{ggyujjhi} : Well that I agree with. She's usually wrong. But still, if you want to let your highly vetted Syrian refugees in fine, just take them to your neighborhood until they decide Islam is not about killing infidels.", ">>{KaijinDV} : That's fine. Although It sounds like you seem to be assuming you and I aren't neighbors, making my neighborhood your neighborhood", '>>{CWApawn} : Except for your view on gender equality, I consider yours a fair point. However, what is the alternative? We live in a global community, so if we do not take advantage of a global market, someone else will. We cannot exist in a bubble and still be relevant. For example, if you FORCE all manufacturing to be done within the country in order to be sold here, it opens doors for black markets of common goods. Furthermore, it limits our companies to ONLY producing and selling within the nation, as other countries will respond to our tariffs with ones of their own, making our companies non-competitive internationally. With globalism, eventually there is equalization. With isolationism, there is only recession and depression.', ">>{omeow} : >I will bite: the western middle class is the only loser in globalization, having their leverage decimated by easier competition from abroad with lower wage demands. >The same reason gender equality hurt men's salaries and the EU hurts leverage for Western European worker compared to the Eastern ones. >The great equalizer it is, except for an escaping elite. Equalization sucks however if you came from the advantaged position. Just my 2¢. Internet has created a situation where technological innovation and knowledge aren't as privileged as they used to be. Without globalisation probably there will be less economic inequality in western societies. But at the same time in the long run their global dominance will be on borrowed time. I am not saying the Western European worker's grievance of his dwindling incomes isn't valid. But the fact that he/she is demanding hundreds of dollars for the same job that someone else is doing at tens of dollars means someone will exploit that difference and make.lots of money. And we are acting like vanishing jobs for unskilled people is something new. But what about typists who were replaced by computers, bank tellers replaced by ATM, check out counters replaced by scanners ......Why do people keep ignoring the fact that majority of job losses are attributed to technology not foreign workers.", '>>{CowBully} : LOL this is an interesting way to spin it. You realize no one takes you or this sub seriously anymore right? My job has been saved because of this.', ">>{Roynerer} : I'm not 100% here. Though isn't it better to not screw up those countries for the sake of your own economy and rather create good, working relationships with them instead to gain influence? Fixing the economy at the core (within the US) is surely better than at the expense of other nations? I mean, was the US trying to control the world with that ever-reaching influence?", '>>{archetech} : Sorry. I meant personally. I was being sarcastic. But not that sarcastic.', '>>{sir_wooly_merkins} : No, no. Right wingers like to say Hitler was *left*.', '>>{danishanus} : No not thousands, but I do see and hear them kneeling to a man killing 11 million ...Yea?', ">>{TheApatheist} : The alternative is guiding it better so the western middle class doesn't feel completely helpless in the face of continuous deterioration of their power and wealth position. A social-democratic governance is only possible within the sphere it has influence over and currently there is no global sphere like that to rein in the excesses, hell, even the EU consists of nearly no social common policies. This would mean a global fight on tax havens, so that countries actually have the ability to tax their rich instead of being stuck in the eternal cycle of tax competition lowering the taxes for the elite and keeping the burden on the middle classes for their social security. Only when there's less capital flight possible, is there a chance for social democracy to work succesfully unlike today (as European countries are getting more inequal too, regardless of who's in power). The power and reach of governance should never be allowed to be less than the power and reach of corporations.", '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Democrats are now neo con free traders. So in other words republicans. What a gross marriage.', '>>{victorged} : Well, to your first paragraph I\'d argue that TPP was an attempt to create exactly that good set of working relationships you were referring to. It was at its core an attempt to generate ground rules to allow the free flow of goods within the common market, with the goal being the mutual benefit and success of each country involved through increased trade. It set IP rights practices between countries, human rights regulation, created arbitration systems to help address things like dumping or currency manipulation, etc. The intent of TPP was never meant to be control of or the destruction of an economy like Brunei or Chile\'s, but rather to leverage the unique capabilities of each and allow for greater mutual prosperity. Take a look at intra-Bloc trade and GDP growth numbers for NAFTA and you\'ll see that in that sense they can be massive successes. Your second paragraph is where it gets a bit more difficult. What does fixing the US economy mean to you? I\'d wager that it almost certainly means something very different than it means to me. You\'re likely discussing domestic industries and manufacturing to attempt to revive the American middle class, whereas I look to new industries and trade opportunities as that lever. The question of whether or not the US was trying to control the world is an interesting one; I would argue that things like the IMF, the WTO, or even the UN are significantly higher on the scale of "things the US manipulates to maintain a geopolitical advantage" than the TPP could have ever been.', ">>{TheApatheist} : Jobs were lost before, as with any previous economic revolution. It created new opportunities for the inhabitants to find other methods of income because the vast majority of wealth stayed in the country. Now it either goes to China via oversized imports, or to the elite due to ease of capital flight and lack of supranational governance. And personally, I'd be much happier with fewer materialistic choices in terms of food, clothing, electronics, but with a sustained advantage over the rest of the world and a more widespread ability of people to afford housing/schooling/... a decent, yet simpler life, in which the basics are more guaranteed than today. That would be a consequence of more local production: fewer things to buy as the labor costs are more expensive, yet more ability for the government to shape it's wealth structure and to provide the basics to its people. And yea, I too am a bit nostalgic about the simpler, yet more fulfilling lives of my parents and grandparents.", ">>{victorged} : oh, sorry! Totally didn't catch that one, I'll *woosh* myself if you'd like. That being said I'm almost certain he got something for it, but I couldn't tell you what off the top of my head. A nice campaign check from Nucor or ArcelorMittal maybe?", ">>{U_r_a_racist} : People don't seem to understand that China steals our stuff(ideas/intellectual property) and if we can't get into their market and leverage some sort of weight we're doomed and the TPP was that first step. You guys didn't give a shit about NAFTA. You buy cheap shit from Walmart all the time and many depend on that cheap shit, the damage is already done. This is just shooting ourselves in the foot after we shot ourselves in the chest. A worse version of the TPP is going to be signed that is going to happen and it won't have the intellectual property stuff in it. The TPP was a form of insurance for the next 30 years. It's not going to stop poor and working class people from getting hosed. You're fucked either way automation and third world manufacturing is too profitable. Republicans and Trump hate unions and paying a living wage, that's what you should be fighting for. This is a symbolic win if you're an idiot. You're being played hardcore. You're being duped into thinking this is a win by the same people who fucked everyone and benefited the most during NAFTA. You may hate Obama but he at least was looking out for American interests. Trump is going to fuck you so hard with TPP 2.0 I hope you're not praising Trump dumping TPP while wearing clothes made in China. I make sure to buy stuff made in the USA. My jeans, my shirts, my work boots, everything I wear all made in America I hope you have a good job so you can afford American prices. What about the electronics you are using to read and post in this thread? Do you own a PC, how about a nice smart phone or are you like me and posting on a tablet? Has Trump antagonizing China been scaring you and when will his bullying tactics stop working? Are you ready to shell out two thousand dollars for an iPhone that used to cost a couple hundred dollars or better yet can you afford to? Did Republicans mismanagement of the housing market instill some new form of confidence I don't know about? Ohh boy I'm sure Trump's cabinet of fools will work better than Bush's clown car. It's amazing to see in this day and age and just 8 fucking years from the global depression people so fucking trusting of the guy at the top. The trustworthy businessman looking out for the best interests of his employees. He can do no wrong, he would definitely take a diminished return for the betterment of his workforce. Don't believe your eyes the stagnant pay, the outsourcing, the layoffs are just your imagination. So you can't afford to put a down payment on a house, renting your entire life ain't so bad. Your wife has to work as well and you work a second job don't worry just work harder. It'll all turn out for the best.", ">>{GeorgeXKennan} : All trade deals are negotiated in secret. It's been public for over a year now.", '>>{YourBlogSucksToo} : How many jobs are going to be lost when China is setting the standards for international trade?', ">>{omeow} : Personally I would be happier with less consumerism too but I don't think that will organically happen in a society on the forefront of hyper-consumerism. I am also baffled by the fact that how conservatives (mostly and few liberals) argue that free market capitalism is not a zero sum game (to support their tax cuts for rich) and then argue how it suddenly becomes zero sum game.when Mexicans and Chinese are becoming rich (which often means making min wage compared to $2/hr) at poor American workers cost.", ">>{IND_CFC} : Hmmm...I'm sure the AFL-CIO is completely neutral and wouldn't provide a biased analysis. It's not like they have a history of doing that or something.... And not a single economists warned about it being constructed behind closed doors. Economists have a basic understanding of how trade deals are done.", ">>{SocialBrushStroke} : Trump owed China about 600 million dollars. Now he's backed out of TPP, with not trying to renegotiate anything, which puts us at a huge disadvantage & puts China at a huge advantage.... Yup, nothing to see here folks. He's totally doing what's best for the country & not himself. >Trump is in a real estate partnership that borrowed $950 million from a group of banks including a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank and the state-owned Bank of China.) http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/12/trump-deutsche-bank-conflict-loans", '>>{IND_CFC} : TPP got highjacked by a misinformation campaign. The whole "secrecy" argument was being pushed well after the full text was available to the public. They didn\'t have any specific arguments against it, so they just freaked people out by saying it was a scary, evil document written by corporate overlords in their evil lair.', '>>{magicsonar} : In Trump\'s world, there are those who win and those who lose - and that is it. He has a deep, abiding faith that the world is a zero-sum game and you can only gain if someone else is failing. And so he looks at trade in the same way. In one of his famous "deal" books, he supposedly says >You hear lots of people say that a great deal is when both sides win. That is a bunch of crap. In a great deal you win — not the other side. You crush the opponent and come away with something better for yourself. - > Think Big and Kick Ass Trump\'s experience is in New York real estate, where he created wealth through "rent", which as an economic term meant that income was received not because you’re creating something of value but because you control something that’s scarce and valuable due to policy decisions. So he developed this world view based on a rent-seeking vision of the economy, in which there’s a fixed amount of wealth that can only be redistributed, never grow. And in his mind, if China or Asia are getting richer, it MUST mean the US is losing out. I don\'t think he honestly understands or has any interest in the concept of win-win.', '>>{pseudolocus} : Yep. This combined with his idea that he has to bargain and threaten all possibilities in order to get the best bargain - *and apply it to foreign policy*- is bad news for this country.', '>>{pseudolocus} : Wait until Dodd Frank gets repealed! Short memory for America indeed.', ">>{magicsonar} : Right. You can see this so clearly in his initial positions about China - he is issuing threats to China about recognizing Taiwan, about the South China Sea, about imposing a 34% tariff on Chinese goods. I think for Trump, threats are part of the deal game. You can see he is approaching the Israel-Palestine problem the same way - doing something provocative like moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem is a way of threatening Palestinians. He is threatening to defund NATO as his opening positioning on Europe. That's how he thinks. The big question arises, if someone like China calls his bluff, what will he do? This is why world leaders try and avoid issuing direct threats to other nations - because it puts you in a corner.", ">>{pseudolocus} : Yes! All of that. Its either going to scare or piss off most countries (middle east), work on some countries (allies in Asia) or alienate then (all of Europe - Germany is for sure already here). And it makes the US look weak and unstable, and ISIS and the like probably think its an amazing time to start testing us. Probably why Obama did a massive show of force last week re: B2 bombing runs (super interesting Maddow last night on so many topics <3). The Israeli embassy is the most useless thing I've seen yet. Is there ANY point to it except to intimidate the Palestinians? Why would you even do this. Isnt it a waste of money?", ">>{magicsonar} : The world is really really complicated. Especially international relations. So many competing and aligned interests. Your best ally is your competitor, your greatest enemy is your ally in some areas. The EU is the United States largest trading partner. China is the third largest. The US economy relies enormously on stability in the EU and in China. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by issuing threats to your trading partners and seeking to undermine stability, simply so you *think* you can have an edge in negotiations. For sure the US is the world's largest economy, so they have leverage. However, the US represents around 22% of global GDP. And that is declining. The danger for the US is that if they seek a path of protectionism and isolation, the rest of the world will simply strengthen ties with each other, leaving the US in the cold.", '>>{CowBully} : Yup. But this is r/politics. You all have to make your self feel better after losing so badly.', '>>{Seqeu} : Sure thing buddy. Because winning and acting like spiteful little children is all that matters, right? Hope your fragile feelings will survive when Trump gets his orange ass kicked out of the White House in 2020.', ">>{pseudolocus} : But we'll have 800 more factory jobs that robots can do! :D Thats not short sighted at all.", ">>{Seqeu} : Ignoring reality helps you cope huh? Obama did great things for the US economy in a time of global crisis. And Obama didn't get his ass kicked out. He won twice and couldn't run a third time because a constitutional amendment allows only two terms. If he had run a third time he would have probably demolished Donnie Dorito", ">>{isubird33} : > If it was so beneficial for americans why the secrecy? Because that's how you negotiate trade deals when dealing with other nations?", '>>{Orlyborly} : Seeing r/politics suddenly go pro-TPP is the funniest thing about this timeline']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{2ndprize} : Why were they carrying around Trump surrogates on the Clinton bus?', ">>{amazingoopah} : Well, that does it I'm not voting for the bus driver for President.", '>>{frackpot} : I have it from a reliable source they were just unloading some trumpettes that snuck on board.', '>>{LordPantyhorn} : Waste? Was it former Ga. congressman Jack Kingston?', '>>{AgoraiosBum} : Ok. Best headline. Good work, USA Today.', ">>{malpais} : Guiz! I don't know if youve been on reddit in the last couple hours, but in case you didn't know: * Clinton Campaign Bus Dumping 'Human Waste' On Side of GA Road (freebeacon.com) * Witness: DNC tour bus dumps human waste into storm drain (cbs46.com) * Democratic campaign bus caught dumping sewage into storm drain (nydailynews.com) * Clinton Campaign Bus Caught Dumping Human Waste In Georgia, HAZMAT Team Called In (youtube.com) * DNC tour bus dumps human waste into storm drains (cbs46.com) * DNC apologizes after campaign bus dumps sewage on Georgia street (11alive.com) * Hillary Clinton campaign bus dumps sewage on Gwinnett County street (11alive.com) * Ga. police investigating Dem campaign bus for dumping human waste (thehill.com) * Clinton campaign bus seen dumping human waste into storm water drain. (wsbtv.com) * Hillary campaign bus craps all over Atlanta suburb (nypost.com) * Police: DNC bus seen dumping sewage near storm drain (fox5atlanta.com) * DNC campaign bus dumps human waste in Gwinnett (ajc.com) BTW - Did you know that Trumps campaign is completely floundering and that he's got less than a 20% chance of winning?", ">>{foolmanchoo} : Merry Christmas! [Shitter's Full!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeskbiJjCXI)", '>>{Stuckinaloop} : The sad thing is. Any bus could do this in San Francisco. Then no one would notice the difference due to all of the shit on the sidewalk.', '>>{Quinnjester} : Does everything becomes a story now? Unbelievable. If Clinton farts will that make the MSM?', '>>{Lorenzo_Canyon} : Wait till you hear what Dave Matthews Band did.'], ['>>{HowITrulyFeel} : Trump kills TPP, giving China its first big win', '>>{CWApawn} : TPP aside (which I do not care for myself), why do you feel that Globalism is bad?', '>>{Baygo22} : Its a flowchart being followed... Did Trump do it? Yes: It is bad, criticize it.', '>>{minercrafter2} : dae (((globalists)))???', ">>{Qunidaye} : Globalism has become a code word for (((JEWS))). I don't think all these nuts are up in arms about comparative advantage or supply chains.", '>>{minercrafter2} : One of the few good things Trump has done.', ">>{victorged} : Well, I guess? I've stated my position that killing the TPP was bad policy for months in this sub, and even called it a win for China a couple weeks ago when Taiwan was still a hot topic, but let's not pretend I'm the average American voter here WaPo. Sanders supporters were anti-TPP, Trump supporters were anti-TPP, and most Clinton supporters were anti-TPP. About the only people who ever really wanted it in America were Obama and possibly Boehner. Neither one holds political office anymore. This one is a win for Trump in fulfilling his campaign promises, and as bad an idea as I personally have always thought it was, the American people were pretty damn explicit on this one. Not fair to mark that particular scorecard against Trump.", ">>{victorged} : If you're absolutely convinced it was going to be detrimental to America, sure. But Trump essentially just handed a victory in control of trade in the Southeast Asian region to the Chinese RCEP Trade Agreeement. The US just forfeited massive amounts of leverage in that region, look to some of what Alexander Downer had to say on BBC this morning, there's already groundswell in Australia and Indonesia to shift to a more Chinese centric trade policy. Trump handed over a lot of leverage and influence for absolutely nothing, and he gave an awful lot of it to China. Unless you're absolutely convinced this deal was horrific for America, that's a bitter pill to swallow.", ">>{magicsonar} : Explain how reducing free trade is a big win for the US? It's good to think through your assumptions. :)", '>>{soggylittleshrimp} : > This sub is complete shit. Thank you come again', ">>{YourBlogSucksToo} : Why? Because you don't like a viewpoint someone shared and are incapable of countering it with facts?", '>>{75962410687} : Why does the US need economic leverage over the entire planet?', '>>{YourBlogSucksToo} : Because this isn\'t a big win for the United States. It\'s status quo for the United States, and offers China a chance to develop their *own* "big win" that we are now powerless to influence *slow clap* well done', ">>{random4893} : I think it's pretty fair to criticize him for doing something that primarily benefits a country he owes hundreds of millions of dollars to.", ">>{YourBlogSucksToo} : While I can agree that, in general, this is Trump responding to the pressure of his base, he is now President of the United States. All the shit that happened on Obama's watch that the right reamed him for is now in his tiny little hands.", ">>{TheApatheist} : I will bite: the western middle class is the only loser in globalization, having their leverage decimated by easier competition from abroad with lower wage demands. The same reason gender equality hurt men's salaries and the EU hurts leverage for Western European worker compared to the Eastern ones. The great equalizer it is, except for an escaping elite. Equalization sucks however if you came from the advantaged position.", ">>{commieflirt} : Otherwise we'd have some Chinese fellow instead of Bill Gates saving all the kids in Africa", '>>{katamario} : This comment is both civil and productive! (/s)', ">>{victorged} : I guess technically it doesn't, but the mroe trade is flowing through your country the more GDP you're likely to generate. This is the big divide between how I look at NAFTA or other trade deals versus how the major political campaigns looked at trade deals. Free flow of goods and GDP *exploded* in North America, and between Canada, the US, and Mexico more trade passes than nearly anywhere else on Earth (RCEP is slightly larger on the whole) intra-Bloc trade soared 41%. It should be viewed as one of the great successes in economic history. http://restud.oxfordjournals.org/content/82/1/1 Unfortunately, the drawbacks are a lot easier to focus on; American manufacturing workforce has dropped by nearly half, even if productivity and real value are up, and it's difficult for the average layman to separate out the effects of increased automation from increased offshoring. Welfare is up, and while some of that may be due to recession lag, it's likely free trade plays a role. In short, NAFTA made an awful lot of people incredibly rich, possibly without them even knowing, but it left people behind too. I view a lot of what's going on now as overreaction, like the US Isolationist streak between World Wars I & II, we saw damage and are trying to keep it at arm's length, but I'm a long way from convinced we're escaping globalization, and I'd rather we write the rulebook than someone else.", '>>{omeow} : >Why does the US need economic leverage over the entire planet? Because economic leverage is far more beneficial to everyone than maintaining unsustainable millitary leverage. Without any leverage US will be just another rich western country with lot of enemies.', ">>{victorged} : Internationally? Positive. It's a straight up renege on years worth of negotiation and we've left a dozen or so Southeast Asian countries in a lurch. That's not going to help any of our negotiations going forward. Domestically is a tougher picture. This will definitely be a popular move nearly universally, and given his lagging favorability numbers and active dissent he needs all of those he can get. Does this translate into meaningful political capital? Possibly, and if so it's entirely plausible that it makes the move worthwhile in the world of team Trump admin so that they can go after something bigger / more controversial. If that's the case I'll have to reassess when I see it happen.", '>>{CWApawn} : Except for your view on gender equality, I consider yours a fair point. However, what is the alternative? We live in a global community, so if we do not take advantage of a global market, someone else will. We cannot exist in a bubble and still be relevant. For example, if you FORCE all manufacturing to be done within the country in order to be sold here, it opens doors for black markets of common goods. Furthermore, it limits our companies to ONLY producing and selling within the nation, as other countries will respond to our tariffs with ones of their own, making our companies non-competitive internationally. With globalism, eventually there is equalization. With isolationism, there is only recession and depression.', ">>{omeow} : >I will bite: the western middle class is the only loser in globalization, having their leverage decimated by easier competition from abroad with lower wage demands. >The same reason gender equality hurt men's salaries and the EU hurts leverage for Western European worker compared to the Eastern ones. >The great equalizer it is, except for an escaping elite. Equalization sucks however if you came from the advantaged position. Just my 2¢. Internet has created a situation where technological innovation and knowledge aren't as privileged as they used to be. Without globalisation probably there will be less economic inequality in western societies. But at the same time in the long run their global dominance will be on borrowed time. I am not saying the Western European worker's grievance of his dwindling incomes isn't valid. But the fact that he/she is demanding hundreds of dollars for the same job that someone else is doing at tens of dollars means someone will exploit that difference and make.lots of money. And we are acting like vanishing jobs for unskilled people is something new. But what about typists who were replaced by computers, bank tellers replaced by ATM, check out counters replaced by scanners ......Why do people keep ignoring the fact that majority of job losses are attributed to technology not foreign workers.", '>>{CowBully} : LOL this is an interesting way to spin it. You realize no one takes you or this sub seriously anymore right? My job has been saved because of this.', ">>{Roynerer} : I'm not 100% here. Though isn't it better to not screw up those countries for the sake of your own economy and rather create good, working relationships with them instead to gain influence? Fixing the economy at the core (within the US) is surely better than at the expense of other nations? I mean, was the US trying to control the world with that ever-reaching influence?", '>>{archetech} : Sorry. I meant personally. I was being sarcastic. But not that sarcastic.', ">>{TheApatheist} : The alternative is guiding it better so the western middle class doesn't feel completely helpless in the face of continuous deterioration of their power and wealth position. A social-democratic governance is only possible within the sphere it has influence over and currently there is no global sphere like that to rein in the excesses, hell, even the EU consists of nearly no social common policies. This would mean a global fight on tax havens, so that countries actually have the ability to tax their rich instead of being stuck in the eternal cycle of tax competition lowering the taxes for the elite and keeping the burden on the middle classes for their social security. Only when there's less capital flight possible, is there a chance for social democracy to work succesfully unlike today (as European countries are getting more inequal too, regardless of who's in power). The power and reach of governance should never be allowed to be less than the power and reach of corporations.", '>>{TwoToneTrump} : Democrats are now neo con free traders. So in other words republicans. What a gross marriage.', '>>{victorged} : Well, to your first paragraph I\'d argue that TPP was an attempt to create exactly that good set of working relationships you were referring to. It was at its core an attempt to generate ground rules to allow the free flow of goods within the common market, with the goal being the mutual benefit and success of each country involved through increased trade. It set IP rights practices between countries, human rights regulation, created arbitration systems to help address things like dumping or currency manipulation, etc. The intent of TPP was never meant to be control of or the destruction of an economy like Brunei or Chile\'s, but rather to leverage the unique capabilities of each and allow for greater mutual prosperity. Take a look at intra-Bloc trade and GDP growth numbers for NAFTA and you\'ll see that in that sense they can be massive successes. Your second paragraph is where it gets a bit more difficult. What does fixing the US economy mean to you? I\'d wager that it almost certainly means something very different than it means to me. You\'re likely discussing domestic industries and manufacturing to attempt to revive the American middle class, whereas I look to new industries and trade opportunities as that lever. The question of whether or not the US was trying to control the world is an interesting one; I would argue that things like the IMF, the WTO, or even the UN are significantly higher on the scale of "things the US manipulates to maintain a geopolitical advantage" than the TPP could have ever been.', ">>{TheApatheist} : Jobs were lost before, as with any previous economic revolution. It created new opportunities for the inhabitants to find other methods of income because the vast majority of wealth stayed in the country. Now it either goes to China via oversized imports, or to the elite due to ease of capital flight and lack of supranational governance. And personally, I'd be much happier with fewer materialistic choices in terms of food, clothing, electronics, but with a sustained advantage over the rest of the world and a more widespread ability of people to afford housing/schooling/... a decent, yet simpler life, in which the basics are more guaranteed than today. That would be a consequence of more local production: fewer things to buy as the labor costs are more expensive, yet more ability for the government to shape it's wealth structure and to provide the basics to its people. And yea, I too am a bit nostalgic about the simpler, yet more fulfilling lives of my parents and grandparents.", ">>{victorged} : oh, sorry! Totally didn't catch that one, I'll *woosh* myself if you'd like. That being said I'm almost certain he got something for it, but I couldn't tell you what off the top of my head. A nice campaign check from Nucor or ArcelorMittal maybe?", ">>{U_r_a_racist} : People don't seem to understand that China steals our stuff(ideas/intellectual property) and if we can't get into their market and leverage some sort of weight we're doomed and the TPP was that first step. You guys didn't give a shit about NAFTA. You buy cheap shit from Walmart all the time and many depend on that cheap shit, the damage is already done. This is just shooting ourselves in the foot after we shot ourselves in the chest. A worse version of the TPP is going to be signed that is going to happen and it won't have the intellectual property stuff in it. The TPP was a form of insurance for the next 30 years. It's not going to stop poor and working class people from getting hosed. You're fucked either way automation and third world manufacturing is too profitable. Republicans and Trump hate unions and paying a living wage, that's what you should be fighting for. This is a symbolic win if you're an idiot. You're being played hardcore. You're being duped into thinking this is a win by the same people who fucked everyone and benefited the most during NAFTA. You may hate Obama but he at least was looking out for American interests. Trump is going to fuck you so hard with TPP 2.0 I hope you're not praising Trump dumping TPP while wearing clothes made in China. I make sure to buy stuff made in the USA. My jeans, my shirts, my work boots, everything I wear all made in America I hope you have a good job so you can afford American prices. What about the electronics you are using to read and post in this thread? Do you own a PC, how about a nice smart phone or are you like me and posting on a tablet? Has Trump antagonizing China been scaring you and when will his bullying tactics stop working? Are you ready to shell out two thousand dollars for an iPhone that used to cost a couple hundred dollars or better yet can you afford to? Did Republicans mismanagement of the housing market instill some new form of confidence I don't know about? Ohh boy I'm sure Trump's cabinet of fools will work better than Bush's clown car. It's amazing to see in this day and age and just 8 fucking years from the global depression people so fucking trusting of the guy at the top. The trustworthy businessman looking out for the best interests of his employees. He can do no wrong, he would definitely take a diminished return for the betterment of his workforce. Don't believe your eyes the stagnant pay, the outsourcing, the layoffs are just your imagination. So you can't afford to put a down payment on a house, renting your entire life ain't so bad. Your wife has to work as well and you work a second job don't worry just work harder. It'll all turn out for the best.", ">>{GeorgeXKennan} : All trade deals are negotiated in secret. It's been public for over a year now.", '>>{YourBlogSucksToo} : How many jobs are going to be lost when China is setting the standards for international trade?', ">>{omeow} : Personally I would be happier with less consumerism too but I don't think that will organically happen in a society on the forefront of hyper-consumerism. I am also baffled by the fact that how conservatives (mostly and few liberals) argue that free market capitalism is not a zero sum game (to support their tax cuts for rich) and then argue how it suddenly becomes zero sum game.when Mexicans and Chinese are becoming rich (which often means making min wage compared to $2/hr) at poor American workers cost.", ">>{IND_CFC} : Hmmm...I'm sure the AFL-CIO is completely neutral and wouldn't provide a biased analysis. It's not like they have a history of doing that or something.... And not a single economists warned about it being constructed behind closed doors. Economists have a basic understanding of how trade deals are done.", ">>{SocialBrushStroke} : Trump owed China about 600 million dollars. Now he's backed out of TPP, with not trying to renegotiate anything, which puts us at a huge disadvantage & puts China at a huge advantage.... Yup, nothing to see here folks. He's totally doing what's best for the country & not himself. >Trump is in a real estate partnership that borrowed $950 million from a group of banks including a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank and the state-owned Bank of China.) http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/12/trump-deutsche-bank-conflict-loans", '>>{IND_CFC} : TPP got highjacked by a misinformation campaign. The whole "secrecy" argument was being pushed well after the full text was available to the public. They didn\'t have any specific arguments against it, so they just freaked people out by saying it was a scary, evil document written by corporate overlords in their evil lair.', '>>{magicsonar} : In Trump\'s world, there are those who win and those who lose - and that is it. He has a deep, abiding faith that the world is a zero-sum game and you can only gain if someone else is failing. And so he looks at trade in the same way. In one of his famous "deal" books, he supposedly says >You hear lots of people say that a great deal is when both sides win. That is a bunch of crap. In a great deal you win — not the other side. You crush the opponent and come away with something better for yourself. - > Think Big and Kick Ass Trump\'s experience is in New York real estate, where he created wealth through "rent", which as an economic term meant that income was received not because you’re creating something of value but because you control something that’s scarce and valuable due to policy decisions. So he developed this world view based on a rent-seeking vision of the economy, in which there’s a fixed amount of wealth that can only be redistributed, never grow. And in his mind, if China or Asia are getting richer, it MUST mean the US is losing out. I don\'t think he honestly understands or has any interest in the concept of win-win.', '>>{pseudolocus} : Yep. This combined with his idea that he has to bargain and threaten all possibilities in order to get the best bargain - *and apply it to foreign policy*- is bad news for this country.', '>>{pseudolocus} : Wait until Dodd Frank gets repealed! Short memory for America indeed.', ">>{magicsonar} : Right. You can see this so clearly in his initial positions about China - he is issuing threats to China about recognizing Taiwan, about the South China Sea, about imposing a 34% tariff on Chinese goods. I think for Trump, threats are part of the deal game. You can see he is approaching the Israel-Palestine problem the same way - doing something provocative like moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem is a way of threatening Palestinians. He is threatening to defund NATO as his opening positioning on Europe. That's how he thinks. The big question arises, if someone like China calls his bluff, what will he do? This is why world leaders try and avoid issuing direct threats to other nations - because it puts you in a corner.", ">>{pseudolocus} : Yes! All of that. Its either going to scare or piss off most countries (middle east), work on some countries (allies in Asia) or alienate then (all of Europe - Germany is for sure already here). And it makes the US look weak and unstable, and ISIS and the like probably think its an amazing time to start testing us. Probably why Obama did a massive show of force last week re: B2 bombing runs (super interesting Maddow last night on so many topics <3). The Israeli embassy is the most useless thing I've seen yet. Is there ANY point to it except to intimidate the Palestinians? Why would you even do this. Isnt it a waste of money?", ">>{magicsonar} : The world is really really complicated. Especially international relations. So many competing and aligned interests. Your best ally is your competitor, your greatest enemy is your ally in some areas. The EU is the United States largest trading partner. China is the third largest. The US economy relies enormously on stability in the EU and in China. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by issuing threats to your trading partners and seeking to undermine stability, simply so you *think* you can have an edge in negotiations. For sure the US is the world's largest economy, so they have leverage. However, the US represents around 22% of global GDP. And that is declining. The danger for the US is that if they seek a path of protectionism and isolation, the rest of the world will simply strengthen ties with each other, leaving the US in the cold.", '>>{CowBully} : Yup. But this is r/politics. You all have to make your self feel better after losing so badly.', '>>{Seqeu} : Sure thing buddy. Because winning and acting like spiteful little children is all that matters, right? Hope your fragile feelings will survive when Trump gets his orange ass kicked out of the White House in 2020.', ">>{pseudolocus} : But we'll have 800 more factory jobs that robots can do! :D Thats not short sighted at all.", ">>{Seqeu} : Ignoring reality helps you cope huh? Obama did great things for the US economy in a time of global crisis. And Obama didn't get his ass kicked out. He won twice and couldn't run a third time because a constitutional amendment allows only two terms. If he had run a third time he would have probably demolished Donnie Dorito", ">>{isubird33} : > If it was so beneficial for americans why the secrecy? Because that's how you negotiate trade deals when dealing with other nations?", '>>{Orlyborly} : Seeing r/politics suddenly go pro-TPP is the funniest thing about this timeline'], ['>>{johnmountain} : Marsha Blackburn’s solution to fake news is really bad - She believes that internet service providers should be responsible for scrubbing the internet of fake news', '>>{IbanezDavy} : How come no one else thinks Comcast sucks balls??? - Comcast users in 2020', '>>{Publius_Jr} : I bet she also thinks Verizon should stop people from having phone sex.', '>>{Mr_Hashtag} : Tennessean checking in. Marsha Blackburn only deals in really bad solutions.', '>>{roboboogienights} : Talk about building walls. Great American Firewall is on its way.', '>>{beezoaram} : And what is her foolproof method for deciding what information is true and what is fake? To creationists information about evolution is fake.', ">>{BuckDoe} : No way. That's the only kind she gets.", '>>{Huck77} : Censorship is not the answer. Censorship threatens freedom. The answer is that we have to become more responsible consumers of information.', '>>{peadith} : It\'s not funny because the only reason people get on the net for real news is they can\'t get it on TV. News papers are dead not just because they stink, are dirty, and always a day late, but because people who can easily read say "WTF is this bullshit." just by glancing at the front page. With absolutely zero reference, how does anyone know the truth until a bunch of people who actually know it complain about the fakes? Service providers don\'t know squat except how much they charge for some data moved, and whatever else their lawyers say they can do.', '>>{cyclopsrex} : All three networks have news programing. CNN, MSNBC, Fox, BBC. There is really quite a lot of news.', '>>{Endorn} : He said *real* news. All of those networks push their own agenda and their news is slated because of that. MSNBC is owned by Comcast for example which donated TONS of cash to the Clinton campaign. Corporate networks also rely on getting interviews with politicians to keep rarings up so not making politicians angry is their top priority as opposed to telling the truth or breaking a story.', '>>{SantaHickeys} : Its not fringe to recognize that all cable outlets have shown a bias toward mainstream candidates', ">>{cyclopsrex} : Yeah, they didn't give Jill Stein enough time for you?", '>>{Mr_Hashtag} : Circling back around to this post more than two weeks later to say ... [see?](http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/republican-congresswoman-marsha-blackburn-s-obamacare-twitter-poll-backfires-n703271)'], [">>{NathanBrittles} : 'Trump's Islamophobia' HuffPo is going to stay a butt hurt rageoholic for quite some time. It's funny to watch.", '>>{ggyujjhi} : These are Muslim Americans, dumb-asses, not Syrian refugees that are inadequately vetted.', '>>{Desi_US} : I hope you apply the same standards to Christian fanatics.', ">>{dirtfarmingcanuck} : Yep we'll get right to business implementing a comprehensive program to put an end to that one guy that bombed an abortion clinic in the 80s. I don't care about Westboro Baptist Church. They're dumb as fuck but they haven't cut any heads off yet.", '>>{dirtfarmingcanuck} : Yes, CNN told me Pence wants to put an end to the separation of church and state.', ">>{RepelGropers} : I know you have never fired a loaded gun at someone. If you had, you wouldn't speak like that.", ">>{dirtfarmingcanuck} : I'm not being even remotely serious. That's how bad the left is though, I guess, that people can't even tell.", '>>{sloppyjoes7} : A "phobia" is an **unfounded** fear of something. I think it\'s rational to be wary of terrorist Muslim attacks.', '>>{UMR-san} : Oh a brigade, cool. Now to get some of that upvotes! Hitler was right.', ">>{danishanus} : Yea if you're Muslim you should be wary of neo nazis attacks too", '>>{sloppyjoes7} : Yes, all those Neo Nazi attacks you hear about on the news. Did you hear about their last attack that killed hundreds or thousands? ...No?', '>>{KaijinDV} : You mean the same Syrian refugees who are going through the most stringent vetting process the US (possibly the world) has ever seen? http://time.com/4116619/syrian-refugees-screening-process/', ">>{KaijinDV} : Then I guess Hillary would be wrong, wouldn't she champ?", ">>{ggyujjhi} : Well that I agree with. She's usually wrong. But still, if you want to let your highly vetted Syrian refugees in fine, just take them to your neighborhood until they decide Islam is not about killing infidels.", ">>{KaijinDV} : That's fine. Although It sounds like you seem to be assuming you and I aren't neighbors, making my neighborhood your neighborhood", '>>{sir_wooly_merkins} : No, no. Right wingers like to say Hitler was *left*.', '>>{danishanus} : No not thousands, but I do see and hear them kneeling to a man killing 11 million ...Yea?']]

classify and reply

['>>{mileyscience} : Clinton, Trump Supporters Have Starkly Different Views of a Changing Nation', ">>{DeniseDeNephew} : Trump supporters want to change the nation back to 1950's America. Actually, republicans have wanted exactly that since the 1960's.", '>>{pm_me_your_cuck_pics} : It\'s because of comparative advantage. There hasn\'t been a better time to be black OR white, but the situation for blacks and minorities is vastly better than before whereas the situation for whites is only "a lot" better than before. Ergo white genocide I guess.', ">>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : And they would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for you meddling hippies and blacks!", '>>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : The question is whether "people like them" are improved by larger government. Certainly, people like me, the ones who have to work six or seven days a week have watched their paycheck erode as it is redistributed by profligate politicians. Meanwhile, more recently, the medical care of the working man has become unaffordable under current policies. We are less likely to be as proud of progressive mandates designed and implemented solely for the benefit of indolent bed pressers. Democrats disagree, and enjoy all the free stuff working people struggle to afford. I know this is unpopular here. We all know these days a worker who desires to keep more of what he earns is considered "greedy" while a politician promising to give it away is called "generous."', ">>{yhwhx} : > Trump supporters want to change the nation back to 1950's America. I think a [sizable portion of the Donald bloc](http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/burn-every-single-nier-this-is-how-trump-supporters-talk-when-they-think-nobodys-listening/) would go for 1850's.", '>>{H37man} : Pence has eroded workers pay and benefits by destroying unions while cutting taxes for corporations. Every state that has enacted right to work laws have seen medium incomes in those states go down. Pence is the person Trump picked as his VP. If you believe electing Trump is going to increases wages across the country you are very mistaken.', '>>{schadenfr3ud3} : Have you ever heard Sanders speak? All he talked about was how great the 50s were and how the workers back then could support a family on min wage.', ">>{nlourb_zdv_khuh} : >Lynch them by their dicks I-i don't think lynching works that way", '>>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : Julian Assange, international leftist darling and duplicitous deep Russian operative, said this election was "a choice between gonorrhea and cholera." I believe electing Trump to anything would be a complete and totally unmitigated planet destroying disaster. I also believe allowing crooked Clinton control would be much, much worse than that Trump tsunami. Under these circumstances, my accountant has urged people like me to "go Mexican." Drop out of the tax system, use cash only, avoid banks where possible and horde cash, cartridges and cars. Voting one way or another will not impact my life. Dropping out, turning on, tuning out, will. This seems a better option than voting in disease, disaffection and dilapidation.', ">>{H37man} : Do us all a favor don't vote and listen to your accountant. It sounds like the perfect thing for people like you to do.", ">>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : It is. But don't forget the part about no longer paying the taxes funding your dreams of a huge, pulsating, engorged invasive government industrial complex. Voting is a scam to convince the people having their earning striped that they somehow agreed to their fleecing just like the indolent bed pressers agreed to it when they voted to take it. You need working people to pay, if they don't your Big Brother benefactor goes broke.", '>>{H37man} : If you quit your job and stop paying taxes I am not worried about it at all. There is a qualified person right behind you who will take it. So listen to your accountant with his doctorate from info wars university and BA in 4 hour long rambling YouTube videos and get off the grid. It will be a win win. You get to drop out of society and the rest of society gets to ignore you.', '>>{SupersoakerJones} : Not sure how you\'re conflating that to mean a "sizeable portion."', ">>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : Funny thing is the leftist never ignores nobody. Progressives have some regulation, rule, registration or licensing mandate or prohibition on just about everything involved in working to make a living. The only people who truly get over are welfare queens and the millionaires and billionaires like the Clintons (and soon the Hawaiian hack Hussein) who channel hundreds of millions of untaxed dollars and foreign donations into phony foundations while charging taxpayers for their security and travel and housing expenses. The youth of today are conformists conditioned to comply. They comply with virtue signaling and unearned arrogance, but they comply and have contempt for anyone who is unwilling to crouch and lick their master's hand. In fact, merely standing up will get the upright human called a kook or what.", ">>{yhwhx} : That was just one of [many data points](https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/08/17/trump-campaign-hires-breitbart-exec-stephen-bannon-cozies-closer-alt-right). EDIT to add: What would you consider a sizable portion? More than 10%? More than 20%? More than 30%? I know there's been at least one [poll related to this](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-race-idUSKCN0ZE2SW).", '>>{ShockingBlue42} : The hyper rich 0.1% capitalist class has rigged the system to increase your tax burden compared to theirs, and you blame bureaucrats in the government for that? Yes, both sides are pork barrel nightmares in our current kleptocracy, but big vs small government is an illusion compared to what is actually affecting our lives in the here and now.', '>>{ShockingBlue42} : How great the 50s were while he was being dragged to jail for supporting civil rights? Our economy was objectively more properly distributed in the 50s as well, so what is your point?', ">>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : Right. Here and now I've gotta go install microwave ovens and custom kitchens.", '>>{CzarMesa} : Well thats your problem. Its ridiculous to be proud or ashamed of the race you happened to be born as.', '>>{musicalbacon} : I would argue both sides are right, actually. While the lives of all minorities of any kind are better exponentially since 1966 on social issues, I can\'t say things are "better" when we have the erosion of the middle class, some of the worst income inequality in modern times, a completely grid locked government, the loss of union jobs, perpetual war, the destabilization of our economy, ect. I think that the question may show the mentality of why one camp would vote for another, but essentially, it\'s not possible to sum up 50 years by "good" or "bad".', ">>{ShockingBlue42} : Too bad you don't have a moment to raise your awareness about class and how it affects everyone. You are thinking that it is unpopular for a worker to keep more of what they earn, what planet are you on? The anti-tax mentality is about the hyper-rich once again rigging the system, confusing the poor and working class that their own taxes will be reduced if they just vote this billionaire into power. You have had decades of this strategy and that is why there are economic hard times right now, the rich fooling the poor.", '>>{growyurown} : This journalist must be a genius. Waiting for his next piece fire burns things.', ">>{growyurown} : Think about it, we would have more jobs, and wouldn't need two incomes to sustain a household. Hillary would be killing it, because email would not be a concern. The amount of press conferences she has had would probably be reasonable. Media wouldn't be as biased. There would be far less news and people would be much less informed about all of her flip flopping.", '>>{ParanoydAndroid} : >Currently, 82% of Republicans have a favorable view of the GOP, up from 69% in June. Sorry, what?', ">>{FlashOfThunder} : I agree with Trump supporters on TPP, which it is bad idea like NAFTA on steroids. Clinton supporters need to understand economically was better 50 yrs ago than now. Stop contradicting yourself by saying that we are better than 50yrs ago and concern income gap between the rich and poor. Social issues have improve but not economically due to neoliberal policies that remove our social benefits and made the rich even more richer. No wonder I can't get along with Clinton supporters"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{mileyscience} : Clinton, Trump Supporters Have Starkly Different Views of a Changing Nation', ">>{DeniseDeNephew} : Trump supporters want to change the nation back to 1950's America. Actually, republicans have wanted exactly that since the 1960's.", '>>{pm_me_your_cuck_pics} : It\'s because of comparative advantage. There hasn\'t been a better time to be black OR white, but the situation for blacks and minorities is vastly better than before whereas the situation for whites is only "a lot" better than before. Ergo white genocide I guess.', ">>{PopcornInMyTeeth} : And they would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for you meddling hippies and blacks!", '>>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : The question is whether "people like them" are improved by larger government. Certainly, people like me, the ones who have to work six or seven days a week have watched their paycheck erode as it is redistributed by profligate politicians. Meanwhile, more recently, the medical care of the working man has become unaffordable under current policies. We are less likely to be as proud of progressive mandates designed and implemented solely for the benefit of indolent bed pressers. Democrats disagree, and enjoy all the free stuff working people struggle to afford. I know this is unpopular here. We all know these days a worker who desires to keep more of what he earns is considered "greedy" while a politician promising to give it away is called "generous."', ">>{yhwhx} : > Trump supporters want to change the nation back to 1950's America. I think a [sizable portion of the Donald bloc](http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/burn-every-single-nier-this-is-how-trump-supporters-talk-when-they-think-nobodys-listening/) would go for 1850's.", '>>{H37man} : Pence has eroded workers pay and benefits by destroying unions while cutting taxes for corporations. Every state that has enacted right to work laws have seen medium incomes in those states go down. Pence is the person Trump picked as his VP. If you believe electing Trump is going to increases wages across the country you are very mistaken.', '>>{schadenfr3ud3} : Have you ever heard Sanders speak? All he talked about was how great the 50s were and how the workers back then could support a family on min wage.', ">>{nlourb_zdv_khuh} : >Lynch them by their dicks I-i don't think lynching works that way", '>>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : Julian Assange, international leftist darling and duplicitous deep Russian operative, said this election was "a choice between gonorrhea and cholera." I believe electing Trump to anything would be a complete and totally unmitigated planet destroying disaster. I also believe allowing crooked Clinton control would be much, much worse than that Trump tsunami. Under these circumstances, my accountant has urged people like me to "go Mexican." Drop out of the tax system, use cash only, avoid banks where possible and horde cash, cartridges and cars. Voting one way or another will not impact my life. Dropping out, turning on, tuning out, will. This seems a better option than voting in disease, disaffection and dilapidation.', ">>{H37man} : Do us all a favor don't vote and listen to your accountant. It sounds like the perfect thing for people like you to do.", ">>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : It is. But don't forget the part about no longer paying the taxes funding your dreams of a huge, pulsating, engorged invasive government industrial complex. Voting is a scam to convince the people having their earning striped that they somehow agreed to their fleecing just like the indolent bed pressers agreed to it when they voted to take it. You need working people to pay, if they don't your Big Brother benefactor goes broke.", '>>{H37man} : If you quit your job and stop paying taxes I am not worried about it at all. There is a qualified person right behind you who will take it. So listen to your accountant with his doctorate from info wars university and BA in 4 hour long rambling YouTube videos and get off the grid. It will be a win win. You get to drop out of society and the rest of society gets to ignore you.', '>>{SupersoakerJones} : Not sure how you\'re conflating that to mean a "sizeable portion."', ">>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : Funny thing is the leftist never ignores nobody. Progressives have some regulation, rule, registration or licensing mandate or prohibition on just about everything involved in working to make a living. The only people who truly get over are welfare queens and the millionaires and billionaires like the Clintons (and soon the Hawaiian hack Hussein) who channel hundreds of millions of untaxed dollars and foreign donations into phony foundations while charging taxpayers for their security and travel and housing expenses. The youth of today are conformists conditioned to comply. They comply with virtue signaling and unearned arrogance, but they comply and have contempt for anyone who is unwilling to crouch and lick their master's hand. In fact, merely standing up will get the upright human called a kook or what.", ">>{yhwhx} : That was just one of [many data points](https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/08/17/trump-campaign-hires-breitbart-exec-stephen-bannon-cozies-closer-alt-right). EDIT to add: What would you consider a sizable portion? More than 10%? More than 20%? More than 30%? I know there's been at least one [poll related to this](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-race-idUSKCN0ZE2SW).", '>>{ShockingBlue42} : The hyper rich 0.1% capitalist class has rigged the system to increase your tax burden compared to theirs, and you blame bureaucrats in the government for that? Yes, both sides are pork barrel nightmares in our current kleptocracy, but big vs small government is an illusion compared to what is actually affecting our lives in the here and now.', '>>{ShockingBlue42} : How great the 50s were while he was being dragged to jail for supporting civil rights? Our economy was objectively more properly distributed in the 50s as well, so what is your point?', ">>{MiyegomboBayartsogt} : Right. Here and now I've gotta go install microwave ovens and custom kitchens.", '>>{CzarMesa} : Well thats your problem. Its ridiculous to be proud or ashamed of the race you happened to be born as.', '>>{musicalbacon} : I would argue both sides are right, actually. While the lives of all minorities of any kind are better exponentially since 1966 on social issues, I can\'t say things are "better" when we have the erosion of the middle class, some of the worst income inequality in modern times, a completely grid locked government, the loss of union jobs, perpetual war, the destabilization of our economy, ect. I think that the question may show the mentality of why one camp would vote for another, but essentially, it\'s not possible to sum up 50 years by "good" or "bad".', ">>{ShockingBlue42} : Too bad you don't have a moment to raise your awareness about class and how it affects everyone. You are thinking that it is unpopular for a worker to keep more of what they earn, what planet are you on? The anti-tax mentality is about the hyper-rich once again rigging the system, confusing the poor and working class that their own taxes will be reduced if they just vote this billionaire into power. You have had decades of this strategy and that is why there are economic hard times right now, the rich fooling the poor.", '>>{growyurown} : This journalist must be a genius. Waiting for his next piece fire burns things.', ">>{growyurown} : Think about it, we would have more jobs, and wouldn't need two incomes to sustain a household. Hillary would be killing it, because email would not be a concern. The amount of press conferences she has had would probably be reasonable. Media wouldn't be as biased. There would be far less news and people would be much less informed about all of her flip flopping.", '>>{ParanoydAndroid} : >Currently, 82% of Republicans have a favorable view of the GOP, up from 69% in June. Sorry, what?', ">>{FlashOfThunder} : I agree with Trump supporters on TPP, which it is bad idea like NAFTA on steroids. Clinton supporters need to understand economically was better 50 yrs ago than now. Stop contradicting yourself by saying that we are better than 50yrs ago and concern income gap between the rich and poor. Social issues have improve but not economically due to neoliberal policies that remove our social benefits and made the rich even more richer. No wonder I can't get along with Clinton supporters"]]

classify and reply

['>>{captain_uranus} : 2016 Is Set To Be The Hottest Year On Record, World Meteorological Organization says', '>>{BoostMakesMeHard} : For everyone wanting to see what a Jet Black iPhone 7 plus looks like after running it caseless since day one.', ">>{LargeMonty} : Weird. It's almost like there's some profound change happening to the climate. Must be something else because I heard that was just a Chinese hoax", '>>{thelazyreader2015} : With Trump on their side, Abbott and Cruz hopeful for term limits on Congress', ">>{bias_is_natural} : **Bias suppression caused climate change.** If people didn't pretend to care about people they really don't care about, we wouldn't have so many people on the planet, and climate change never would have occurred. People suppressing their natural bias is unnatural and dangerous. Climate change and discrimination are both products of bias suppression. Liberals are bias deniers, and, until they accept bias is human nature, they'll continue to cause problems. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.", '>>{mmy3rs0876} : So thankful I traded in the jet black for matte black', ">>{YourBlogSucksToo} : Nothing to worry about! With a single party having unified control in Washington, surely people concerned about the climate should be confident that everything will be fine. I'm sure those that chose to stay home or vote third party have absolutely no regrets", '>>{Pollux182} : *"Challenge accepted!"* -President-elect Trump', ">>{saullyj} : I don't think the phone is supposed to develop a patina like the leather case...", '>>{delreyloveXO} : Even my iPhone loves me more than my girlfriend do.', ">>{Egorse} : I'd be amazed if they get enough people in congress to agree to limit themselves.", ">>{purplestrea_k} : I'm still amazed they want to do this. It will make unopposed races less likely.", '>>{BornUnderPunches} : This is as expected after all the news of record-setting months after months this year. Just a hoax though.', ">>{BlueSwoosh248} : If Cruz wants to decline to run again, I'm all for that.", '>>{examinati0n} : I love it brand new but this hurts my eyes.', '>>{Un-trollable} : Looks cheap and bad tbh. Yeah, it feels better in the hand but those scratches would drive me nuts. Glad I chose matte black.', ">>{KevOK80} : This post title and your screen shot have absolutely no correlation between them. I don't get it.", '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : We have paleoclimate data of different types stretching back thousands and millions of years. We can study cycles and other fluctuations in past climate. People whose job it is to study the climate overwhelmingly conclude that modern climate change does not line up with any known natural influence, and very well with forcings due to man made changes.', ">>{Jeph_2000} : I've been using a transparent case since day one and it still looks good as new", '>>{HumanInHope} : You should know that global temperature has a well known liberal bias', '>>{Plugawy_Nedznik} : Actually I\'m fairly certain it meant "on record of human civilization". Before humans we\'ve had climates that were way hotter than anything you\'ll see in the next 100 years at least.', '>>{nvs1980} : They need to focus their time fixing gerrymandering rather than worrying about congressional term limits. We need to have a congress that actually represents that people of this country first then worry about large scale changes in the way they govern.', ">>{SuperUser5000} : Truth is, he has actually replaced he's girlfriend with Siri", '>>{lemonviking} : Mine is exactly the same. The the smudges are more annyoing.', '>>{ryanknapper} : Your girlfriend is unable to get passed the typo and/or grammar in your title.', ">>{CaptainAwesome06} : It's a well known liberal agenda to get people to care about the planet for some reason.", '>>{BoostMakesMeHard} : This was the worst possible angle. I can take another pic at a different angle to compare if anyone is interested. Also, to those wondering, this was shot with a Sony A6000 on the 35mm f1.8 lens', ">>{PANSIES_FOR_ALL} : And I'm unable to get *past* your typo.", ">>{KittenSwagger} : What's to fix? Its a high gloss mirror finish. This is what happens...", '>>{ItsBeenFun2017} : TIL. I always just assumed they were interchangeable. https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/to-get-passed-get-past.1140600/ >Hi, >1) "To get passed" is grammatically correct, but only in a completely different situation. In this sense, "to pass" means to throw or give something from one person to another. It\'s often used in sports - The football got passed from the quarterback to the receiver. >However, this sounds very clumsy for two reasons: >a) It\'s much better to use the verb "was" - "The football was passed..." b) It\'s better to use active voice in the first place - "The quarterback passed the football to the receiver." >2) "To get past" and "to pass up" have very different connotations. The first implies overcoming an obstacle, either emotional or physical. The second implies missing an opportunity. >Some examples: >"This video game is so hard! I can\'t get past the second level!" "I know the divorce was very traumatic for you, but you have to get past it and move on with your life." >"I passed up my chance to invest in Google stock while it was cheap." "Don\'t pass up this fantastic opportunity - you\'ll regret it!" Source: Some guy on WordReference', ">>{Bartins} : It would be awesome but there is seriously no way in hell they get this passed unless it's like 30 years or some shit", '>>{_Damn_Russians_} : Edit 2 - I was wrong. Term limits are in fact a terrible idea.', '>>{RayWencube} : Term limits in Congress would be among the worst changes to government in US history', '>>{fairshare3} : Are you telling me that scientists overwhelmingly agree on what the temperature at my house was a million years ago? Where can I find this info?', '>>{Chino1130} : Obviously the World Meteorological Organization is in the pockets of the Chinese.', '>>{badooks} : Are you referring to the "-1233"? If so, is that a jailbreak feature?', ">>{TheMDV} : Yeah, most likely a jailbreak. Don't know what it does though.", ">>{hiepdn} : Absolutely right. I'm still using it though, not that I care about the phone's appearance, but it's good to be careful since I know I'm gonna drop the phone someday again.", ">>{Baselt95} : It's showing how many mAh are being deducted from the battery at a certain interval. You can get it from [[BatteryLife]] if you're jailbroken", ">>{MaximumEffort433} : What does President-Elect Trump have to say on the matter? >“I’m not a believer in global warming, and I’m not a believer in man-made global warming. It could be warming, and it’s going to start to cool at some point. And you know, in the early, in the 1920s, people talked about global cooling. I don’t know if you know that or not. >“I believe there’s weather. I believe there’s change, and I believe it goes up and it goes down, and it goes up again. And it changes depending on years and centuries, but I am not a believer, and we have much bigger problems, >“You know, to me, the worst global warming, and I mentioned this to you once before, is nuclear warming. That’s our global warming, that’s what I see, because we have incompetent people, and we have these rogue nations, and not even rogue nations anymore.” [Source](https://thinkprogress.org/donald-trump-admits-he-believes-in-weather-3bdc6594dd67#.cdcatfveq) TL;DR: Donald Trump doesn't believe in man-made global warming, he believes we have weather and it goes up and it goes down and it goes up again. The worst global warming is nuclear warming because we have rogue nations and not even rogue nations anymore. Wew", '>>{deck_hand} : We are (according to science) somewhere around 1º above pre-industrial temperature. We know (again, science) that temperatures rose around half a degree from the coolest part of the 19th century to the 1940s, and cooled again until it reached a low around 1976. The thing is, over the course of the last 20 years, the actual value reported for the 1930s and 40s has changed by nearly half a degree, because of estimates of how temperature measurements were made. Now, if we can\'t get the *actual* measurements of 80 years ago within half a degree of known good, how do you expect that we know within half a degree, or even a full degree, what the temperature was across the entire globe in July, 1101? The answer is, you can\'t. The margin of error for that period is very, very large. We\'re not even talking about the paleoclimate, we\'re talking about history that was witnessed and recorded by men. I\'ve seen the estimates, they are all over the map. Everyone has his own personal favorite way of estimating the temperature of their region of interest, and someone accumulates all of these up and takes that 0.1% of the planet and extrapolates the temperature of the rest of the world. There is NO WAY you guys know within a tenth of a degree what temperature floating ice in the arctic 1000 years ago was. No way at all. So, what we do know is that we\'re warmer now than we were in the 1950s, and that was warmer than the 1910s, but that was cooler than the 1880s and the 1860s. I agree we\'ve had some warming, but I do not believe you when you tell me you know within a few tenths of a degree how much it\'s warmed over the last 150 years. You lie by inserting precision you can\'t possibly know into your reports, to make it seem like you\'ve got the science down to a very precise level. We do have unknowns. We very well might be "hotter than any time in the last 3 million years," because we just don\'t have the solid measurements to be able to tell. But, I\'m highly doubtful.', '>>{Petro1313} : Hey Siri, who is your daddy and what does he do?', '>>{ilovecreamcheese} : Also, it presumably was handled impeccably. It was never dropped nor stored in pocket with metal objects like keys.', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : And? The temperature on Earth during the Cretaceous Period is not highly relevant to the sustainability of human survival today.', ">>{Bigchile123} : It looks really good! Specially from that angle. I love it. I still wouldn't go careless, because life happens and things fall. And too the people who say it looks ugly, it's a phone people.", '>>{RayWencube} : It gets rid of the one benefit to having long serving members--the development of expertise--in exchange for absolutely nothing.', '>>{Seraphic_Wings} : This is why I bought the Champagne Gold In fact, Jet Black iPhones are the cheapest variant where I live LUL', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : Not on a daily basis, no, but the phrase you want to research is *temperature proxy*. Isotopic fractionation of oxygen in rocks, and stoma concentrations on fossilized leaves can both give good correlates for long-term shifts in global temperature.', ">>{Jeoyeyo} : I was doubting till the last day whether to get the jet black or the matte black one. Thank God I chose the latter! It looks horrible, to be honest. It also looks disgusting with a transparent case. And there's no point in getting the jet black if you're going to use a non-transparent case. Apple should fix this with the next generation.", ">>{wittyusername902} : Well I don't *feel* any warmer than normal, actually I'm quite a bit cold right now. Politicians shouldn't be dealing with stupid statistics and numbers, those don't give you the whole picture! They should address how the people feel, so until I'm warmer, I say we heat this place up!", '>>{snowballs884} : NBC News just called it the great freeze - coldest weather in years. Is our country still spending money on the GLOBAL WARMING HOAX? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/427226424987385856', ">>{AriCode} : I don't see apple doing another jet black situation again. It will either be aluminum or glass. The micro abrasions and smudges are bad, only if you can really see them in light.", '>>{SkateboardG} : Yeah, I fucking noticed. source: I work outdoors.', ">>{ontopic} : Sorry, we voted against climate change. It isn't real now.", ">>{SilverMt} : It takes away the choice of voters. I don't like the idea. It would force our best long-term House members out. They would be replaced by those who could afford to run expensive campaign. The Koch brothers and other wealthy people would handpick their candidates to replace those in Congress who serve us well. New congressional members would be newbies and even more dependent on lobbyists to help them learn the ropes.", ">>{SinisterSinister} : Here in Colorado it's been extremely warm all month. I've never seen a November like this in my life. The ski resorts are struggling to open for the year in the Rockies and that's saying something. With that said fuck winter. Snow sucks.", ">>{EndoShota} : It usually takes a while time for a congressperson to gain the experience to know how to work the system and craft decent legislation. While I'm not opposed to the concept of congressional term limits, they should allow for a longer tenure than the presidency, for instance, and the senate should probably have a longer go than the house.", '>>{minja134} : It could allow for popular, well liked, well working senators to be forced out, which could leave an opening for senators backed by corporate interests to gain more seats since the large amounts of money make a significantly greater difference at this level.', '>>{_Damn_Russians_} : Yea, you got a point. This combined with CU is a nightmare. They could literally buy seats. Going to amend my OP.', ">>{MaelstromTX} : I was thinking this as well. Republicans have a far more efficient machine for manufacturing new candidates that will toe the party line , which is why some among them support this measure; it's just another advantage for them to hold onto power forever.", ">>{rocketrex504} : It's just as bad on the top and bottom of mine has marks all over it", ">>{theduke9} : Yeah but there's no way humans could destroy something created by a god .", '>>{OfficialBattleX} : 5\' 3" over here, my iPhone 5s looks the same in my hands as the iPhone 7+ in your hands!', ">>{TreesAreOurFathers} : Yeah dude, it's 70 degrees here & it's november 14th. wtf, usually it's like, 30 degrees.", ">>{Vega-25} : I'm so glad I went with the regular black. Those scratches would've driven me insane.", ">>{HalfnHalfCoffeeJelly} : Even non jet black sucks. I don't know what my coworker does but I can see black paint worn away in the lower half of his iPhone 7.", '>>{NeverSkurred75} : Yup. I have matte black in a gorgeous case. I never have to worry about my phone and is always beautiful!', ">>{frontyfront} : I hate to bring this up, but a what point do we say enough is enough and start literally blowing things up? Yes it's a stupid idea that would impact the daily lives of millions and could send society backwards like never before. It's a terrible thought experiment, but at what point would the immediate destruction of major pollution sources be, regrettably, a better choice than the unstoppable end of the human race?", ">>{KardelSharpeyes} : Don't worry, Trump's got the uuuugggest freezer hes just going to leave it open.", '>>{angry-mustache} : It gives more power and control to the National committees over the individual congressmen. Junior legislators don\'t have the political capital to go against the party or oppose a popular but potentially disastrous piece of legislation. We can use the 2002 authorization to use force in Iraq as a case study. It\'s arguably one of the single most disastrous pieces of resolution passed through congress. Almost every republican voted for it (Lincoln Chaffee was the lone republican to vote against), as did 29/50 democrats. However 21 democrats voted against. We can look at the average time in congress of the senators that voted for and against. (name - years in congress) For > Bayh, Evan - 3 > Baucus, Max - 24 > Biden, Joseph - 29 > Breaux, John - 15 > Cantwell, Maria - 1 > Carnahan, Jean -1 > Carper, Thomas - 1 > Cleland, Max - 4 > Clinton, Hillary - 1 > Daschle, Tom - 15 > Dodd, Chris - 21 > Dorgan, Byron - 10 > Edwards, John - 3 > Feinstein, Dianne - 10 > Harkin, Tom - 17 > Hollings, Ernest -36 > Johnson, Tim - 5 > Kerry, John - 19 > Kohl, Herb - 13 > Landrieu, Mary - 5 > Lieberman, Joseph - 13 > Lincoln, Blanche - 3 > Miller, Zell - 2 > Nelson, Ben - 2 > Nelson, Bill - 2 > Reid, Harry - 15 > Rockefeller, Jay - 17 > Schumer, Chuck -3 > Torricelli, Robert - 5 Mean : 9.6 Median : 5 Against > Akaka, Daniel - 12 > Bingaman, Jeff - 19 > Boxer, Barbara - 9 > Byrd, Robert - 43 > Conrad, Kent - 15 > Corzine, Jon - 1 > Dayton, Mark - 1 > Durbin, Dick - 5 > Feingold, Russ - 9 > Graham, Bob - 15 > Inouye, Daniel - 39 > Kennedy, Edward - 40 > Leahy, Patrick - 27 > Levin, Carl - 23 > Mikulski, Barbara -15 > Murray, Patty - 9 > Reed, Jack - 5 > Sarbanes, Paul - 25 > Stabenow, Debbie - 1 > Wellstone, Paul - 11 > Wyden, Ron - 8 Mean : 15.6 Median - 12 The group of senators that voted against the Iraq War had considerably more time in congress than the group that voted yes. Ted Kennedy and Robert Bynd led the charge on the "no" group, and that action would be a lot harder if they doesn\'t have the gravitas from 40+ years in the senate.', '>>{gameovar} : Is good idea taken from here in Motherland! When member of Duma is opposing Glorious Eternal President, will soon find self in conflict of term limit, also will be dead! (death is unrelated to conflict of course)', '>>{monoxl1} : Something to look forward too. Not one to use cases. Just delays the inevitable.', '>>{JimmithyWeav} : I just bought an iPhone 7 Plus Jet Black yesterday and I have to go a few days without a case until my midnight blue leather one comes in the mail. I love the way it looks and feels but I am afraid of this happening haha', '>>{hostmatty} : I thought it would look a lot worse. Yes, there are some scratches, but so what?', '>>{fairshare3} : Can they determine that it was hotter here this year than at any time in history?', ">>{BoostMakesMeHard} : Wrong. I pick it up and put it down on my desk all day long. It touches rough surfaces all the time. Never dropped it because I'm an adult, but I don't baby it in the least.", '>>{Pottytrainer} : Global warming and climate change are linked. Overall, meaning THE GLOBE, not just the US, but the global average temperature is increasing, melting the ice that keeps our planet cool, by the very fact that it is ice, and by the fact that it is white, thus reflecting the sun back. When this ice melt passes tipping point, the earth will no longer have a way to cool as it has in the past. This will cause all sorts of extreme weather , flooding, warming AND cooling (depending on your region, gulf stream will change flow etc), catastrophe basically. That folks continue to deny, using semantics is a tragedy for the human race.', '>>{appmanga} : Trump is not 3/5th of the states, so their hopefulness might be unwarranted.', '>>{atchijov} : Considering that we have very very few good members and quite a few of really horrible ones... replacing the whole lot would probably improve average level.', '>>{acowwithglasses} : Why? It would de facto end the entire concept of career politicians, who are all in reality beholden to special interest groups.', ">>{leonardofind} : Mitch McConnell already said he would NEVER introduce it. So it's a fail attempt on their part.", '>>{leonardofind} : Are you saying their is no such a thing as being indispensable? Considering the great majority of congress members run unopposed, what choice do voters have.', '>>{leonardofind} : Is that why Trump is the way he is?', ">>{rafael000} : I have a jet black using without a case since day 1 too. On this same angle and light I can see all the scratches, just like yours (maybe even worst), but 90% of the times you look at it, you can barely see any scratch, because the deep black masks them. also, this is the first iPhone I use without a case with confidence. the grip is great and the feeling of a caseless phone too (no lips around the screen). no regrets, I'm ok having the scratches in exchange for a better experience with the device.", '>>{realtsuke} : if its 30 years then its 30 years. As long as the law is in the books it becomes easier to modify down the line. I will take it.', ">>{RayWencube} : But it wouldn't end politicians being beholden to special interests. To get elected and to get re-elected the maximum number of times, the politician would have to use those same special interests. The only time it might work is in that politician's last term. But then the politician has an incentive to curry favor to either get a preferred successor elected or to secure a job after that term. Meanwhile, it destroys the idea of legislators building expertise. It's a bandaid being applied to a wound that needs a hundred stitches, except you're putting the bandaid on someone else and also the bandaid is poison.", '>>{acowwithglasses} : Over time, these ties to specific interest groups will grow. That is why you see so called "revolving doors" in Washington, where individuals go back and forth between lobbying roles and being politicians. It\'s a horrible and de facto corrupt system. Of course it should be discarded.', '>>{SilverMt} : Voters could find someone to run against their incumbents. Citizens have a role in our democracy too, and people seem to have forgotten this.', ">>{Tackticat} : Mine's still like new just as it was delivered on 9/16/2016. I got a case. Jet Black, the best looking one of all.", '>>{Jeph_2000} : It looks better than full of scratches, plus I can take it off every week to admire the perfect jet black', ">>{MakeWar0813} : I actually love the way it looks, it isn't a leather patina but it has a unique personal look to it. I've got the matte black since day one and go back and forth between no case and apple leather case but it looks the same as everyone else's, I think yours is quite unique.", ">>{SilverMt} : I disagree. I don't want to throw Bernie Sanders or my Oregon Senators out of Congress only to be replaced by newbies picked by the oligarchs.", '>>{atchijov} : Nothing will fix the congress if people will keep ignoring voting. If all eligible voters actually bother to show up and vote (and voted with they head... not with they guts)... there will be very little oligarchs could do to sway outcome.', ">>{ScholarOfTwilight} : The voters ARE the term limits. It's how everything is designed.", ">>{RayWencube} : The revolving door is not the result of long-serving congressmen. It's the result of a broken campaign finance system. Term limits only increases the necessity of a Rep. or Senator availing him or herself of the revolving door because they can't stay in government.", ">>{acowwithglasses} : The same problem is found in basically all western democracies. This is not due to a broken campaign finance system. If it was, you wouldn't see the same thing in Canada, UK, France, Germany, Australia etc.", '>>{arg_sy} : Or maybe those with power have just created similar systems in those other countries with the same flaws.', ">>{stvenkman420} : It might be unconstitutional as well. Such a law would presume the Federal government can deny the people's choice on who they want to represent their state in Congress.", '>>{acowwithglasses} : One of those flaws is unlimited terms, which adds to far too close relationships between certain interest groups and certain politicians.', '>>{leonardofind} : Right, you just have to come up with 45 million dollars. You have that in your pocket?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{captain_uranus} : 2016 Is Set To Be The Hottest Year On Record, World Meteorological Organization says', ">>{LargeMonty} : Weird. It's almost like there's some profound change happening to the climate. Must be something else because I heard that was just a Chinese hoax", ">>{bias_is_natural} : **Bias suppression caused climate change.** If people didn't pretend to care about people they really don't care about, we wouldn't have so many people on the planet, and climate change never would have occurred. People suppressing their natural bias is unnatural and dangerous. Climate change and discrimination are both products of bias suppression. Liberals are bias deniers, and, until they accept bias is human nature, they'll continue to cause problems. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.", ">>{YourBlogSucksToo} : Nothing to worry about! With a single party having unified control in Washington, surely people concerned about the climate should be confident that everything will be fine. I'm sure those that chose to stay home or vote third party have absolutely no regrets", '>>{Pollux182} : *"Challenge accepted!"* -President-elect Trump', '>>{BornUnderPunches} : This is as expected after all the news of record-setting months after months this year. Just a hoax though.', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : We have paleoclimate data of different types stretching back thousands and millions of years. We can study cycles and other fluctuations in past climate. People whose job it is to study the climate overwhelmingly conclude that modern climate change does not line up with any known natural influence, and very well with forcings due to man made changes.', '>>{HumanInHope} : You should know that global temperature has a well known liberal bias', '>>{Plugawy_Nedznik} : Actually I\'m fairly certain it meant "on record of human civilization". Before humans we\'ve had climates that were way hotter than anything you\'ll see in the next 100 years at least.', ">>{CaptainAwesome06} : It's a well known liberal agenda to get people to care about the planet for some reason.", '>>{fairshare3} : Are you telling me that scientists overwhelmingly agree on what the temperature at my house was a million years ago? Where can I find this info?', '>>{Chino1130} : Obviously the World Meteorological Organization is in the pockets of the Chinese.', ">>{MaximumEffort433} : What does President-Elect Trump have to say on the matter? >“I’m not a believer in global warming, and I’m not a believer in man-made global warming. It could be warming, and it’s going to start to cool at some point. And you know, in the early, in the 1920s, people talked about global cooling. I don’t know if you know that or not. >“I believe there’s weather. I believe there’s change, and I believe it goes up and it goes down, and it goes up again. And it changes depending on years and centuries, but I am not a believer, and we have much bigger problems, >“You know, to me, the worst global warming, and I mentioned this to you once before, is nuclear warming. That’s our global warming, that’s what I see, because we have incompetent people, and we have these rogue nations, and not even rogue nations anymore.” [Source](https://thinkprogress.org/donald-trump-admits-he-believes-in-weather-3bdc6594dd67#.cdcatfveq) TL;DR: Donald Trump doesn't believe in man-made global warming, he believes we have weather and it goes up and it goes down and it goes up again. The worst global warming is nuclear warming because we have rogue nations and not even rogue nations anymore. Wew", '>>{deck_hand} : We are (according to science) somewhere around 1º above pre-industrial temperature. We know (again, science) that temperatures rose around half a degree from the coolest part of the 19th century to the 1940s, and cooled again until it reached a low around 1976. The thing is, over the course of the last 20 years, the actual value reported for the 1930s and 40s has changed by nearly half a degree, because of estimates of how temperature measurements were made. Now, if we can\'t get the *actual* measurements of 80 years ago within half a degree of known good, how do you expect that we know within half a degree, or even a full degree, what the temperature was across the entire globe in July, 1101? The answer is, you can\'t. The margin of error for that period is very, very large. We\'re not even talking about the paleoclimate, we\'re talking about history that was witnessed and recorded by men. I\'ve seen the estimates, they are all over the map. Everyone has his own personal favorite way of estimating the temperature of their region of interest, and someone accumulates all of these up and takes that 0.1% of the planet and extrapolates the temperature of the rest of the world. There is NO WAY you guys know within a tenth of a degree what temperature floating ice in the arctic 1000 years ago was. No way at all. So, what we do know is that we\'re warmer now than we were in the 1950s, and that was warmer than the 1910s, but that was cooler than the 1880s and the 1860s. I agree we\'ve had some warming, but I do not believe you when you tell me you know within a few tenths of a degree how much it\'s warmed over the last 150 years. You lie by inserting precision you can\'t possibly know into your reports, to make it seem like you\'ve got the science down to a very precise level. We do have unknowns. We very well might be "hotter than any time in the last 3 million years," because we just don\'t have the solid measurements to be able to tell. But, I\'m highly doubtful.', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : And? The temperature on Earth during the Cretaceous Period is not highly relevant to the sustainability of human survival today.', '>>{sagan_drinks_cosmos} : Not on a daily basis, no, but the phrase you want to research is *temperature proxy*. Isotopic fractionation of oxygen in rocks, and stoma concentrations on fossilized leaves can both give good correlates for long-term shifts in global temperature.', ">>{wittyusername902} : Well I don't *feel* any warmer than normal, actually I'm quite a bit cold right now. Politicians shouldn't be dealing with stupid statistics and numbers, those don't give you the whole picture! They should address how the people feel, so until I'm warmer, I say we heat this place up!", '>>{snowballs884} : NBC News just called it the great freeze - coldest weather in years. Is our country still spending money on the GLOBAL WARMING HOAX? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/427226424987385856', '>>{SkateboardG} : Yeah, I fucking noticed. source: I work outdoors.', ">>{ontopic} : Sorry, we voted against climate change. It isn't real now.", ">>{SinisterSinister} : Here in Colorado it's been extremely warm all month. I've never seen a November like this in my life. The ski resorts are struggling to open for the year in the Rockies and that's saying something. With that said fuck winter. Snow sucks.", ">>{theduke9} : Yeah but there's no way humans could destroy something created by a god .", ">>{TreesAreOurFathers} : Yeah dude, it's 70 degrees here & it's november 14th. wtf, usually it's like, 30 degrees.", ">>{frontyfront} : I hate to bring this up, but a what point do we say enough is enough and start literally blowing things up? Yes it's a stupid idea that would impact the daily lives of millions and could send society backwards like never before. It's a terrible thought experiment, but at what point would the immediate destruction of major pollution sources be, regrettably, a better choice than the unstoppable end of the human race?", ">>{KardelSharpeyes} : Don't worry, Trump's got the uuuugggest freezer hes just going to leave it open.", '>>{fairshare3} : Can they determine that it was hotter here this year than at any time in history?', '>>{Pottytrainer} : Global warming and climate change are linked. Overall, meaning THE GLOBE, not just the US, but the global average temperature is increasing, melting the ice that keeps our planet cool, by the very fact that it is ice, and by the fact that it is white, thus reflecting the sun back. When this ice melt passes tipping point, the earth will no longer have a way to cool as it has in the past. This will cause all sorts of extreme weather , flooding, warming AND cooling (depending on your region, gulf stream will change flow etc), catastrophe basically. That folks continue to deny, using semantics is a tragedy for the human race.'], ['>>{delreyloveXO} : Even my iPhone loves me more than my girlfriend do.', ">>{KevOK80} : This post title and your screen shot have absolutely no correlation between them. I don't get it.", ">>{SuperUser5000} : Truth is, he has actually replaced he's girlfriend with Siri", '>>{ryanknapper} : Your girlfriend is unable to get passed the typo and/or grammar in your title.', ">>{PANSIES_FOR_ALL} : And I'm unable to get *past* your typo.", '>>{ItsBeenFun2017} : TIL. I always just assumed they were interchangeable. https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/to-get-passed-get-past.1140600/ >Hi, >1) "To get passed" is grammatically correct, but only in a completely different situation. In this sense, "to pass" means to throw or give something from one person to another. It\'s often used in sports - The football got passed from the quarterback to the receiver. >However, this sounds very clumsy for two reasons: >a) It\'s much better to use the verb "was" - "The football was passed..." b) It\'s better to use active voice in the first place - "The quarterback passed the football to the receiver." >2) "To get past" and "to pass up" have very different connotations. The first implies overcoming an obstacle, either emotional or physical. The second implies missing an opportunity. >Some examples: >"This video game is so hard! I can\'t get past the second level!" "I know the divorce was very traumatic for you, but you have to get past it and move on with your life." >"I passed up my chance to invest in Google stock while it was cheap." "Don\'t pass up this fantastic opportunity - you\'ll regret it!" Source: Some guy on WordReference', '>>{badooks} : Are you referring to the "-1233"? If so, is that a jailbreak feature?', ">>{TheMDV} : Yeah, most likely a jailbreak. Don't know what it does though.", ">>{Baselt95} : It's showing how many mAh are being deducted from the battery at a certain interval. You can get it from [[BatteryLife]] if you're jailbroken", '>>{Petro1313} : Hey Siri, who is your daddy and what does he do?'], ['>>{thelazyreader2015} : With Trump on their side, Abbott and Cruz hopeful for term limits on Congress', ">>{Egorse} : I'd be amazed if they get enough people in congress to agree to limit themselves.", ">>{purplestrea_k} : I'm still amazed they want to do this. It will make unopposed races less likely.", ">>{BlueSwoosh248} : If Cruz wants to decline to run again, I'm all for that.", '>>{nvs1980} : They need to focus their time fixing gerrymandering rather than worrying about congressional term limits. We need to have a congress that actually represents that people of this country first then worry about large scale changes in the way they govern.', ">>{Bartins} : It would be awesome but there is seriously no way in hell they get this passed unless it's like 30 years or some shit", '>>{_Damn_Russians_} : Edit 2 - I was wrong. Term limits are in fact a terrible idea.', '>>{RayWencube} : Term limits in Congress would be among the worst changes to government in US history', '>>{RayWencube} : It gets rid of the one benefit to having long serving members--the development of expertise--in exchange for absolutely nothing.', ">>{SilverMt} : It takes away the choice of voters. I don't like the idea. It would force our best long-term House members out. They would be replaced by those who could afford to run expensive campaign. The Koch brothers and other wealthy people would handpick their candidates to replace those in Congress who serve us well. New congressional members would be newbies and even more dependent on lobbyists to help them learn the ropes.", ">>{EndoShota} : It usually takes a while time for a congressperson to gain the experience to know how to work the system and craft decent legislation. While I'm not opposed to the concept of congressional term limits, they should allow for a longer tenure than the presidency, for instance, and the senate should probably have a longer go than the house.", '>>{minja134} : It could allow for popular, well liked, well working senators to be forced out, which could leave an opening for senators backed by corporate interests to gain more seats since the large amounts of money make a significantly greater difference at this level.', '>>{_Damn_Russians_} : Yea, you got a point. This combined with CU is a nightmare. They could literally buy seats. Going to amend my OP.', ">>{MaelstromTX} : I was thinking this as well. Republicans have a far more efficient machine for manufacturing new candidates that will toe the party line , which is why some among them support this measure; it's just another advantage for them to hold onto power forever.", '>>{angry-mustache} : It gives more power and control to the National committees over the individual congressmen. Junior legislators don\'t have the political capital to go against the party or oppose a popular but potentially disastrous piece of legislation. We can use the 2002 authorization to use force in Iraq as a case study. It\'s arguably one of the single most disastrous pieces of resolution passed through congress. Almost every republican voted for it (Lincoln Chaffee was the lone republican to vote against), as did 29/50 democrats. However 21 democrats voted against. We can look at the average time in congress of the senators that voted for and against. (name - years in congress) For > Bayh, Evan - 3 > Baucus, Max - 24 > Biden, Joseph - 29 > Breaux, John - 15 > Cantwell, Maria - 1 > Carnahan, Jean -1 > Carper, Thomas - 1 > Cleland, Max - 4 > Clinton, Hillary - 1 > Daschle, Tom - 15 > Dodd, Chris - 21 > Dorgan, Byron - 10 > Edwards, John - 3 > Feinstein, Dianne - 10 > Harkin, Tom - 17 > Hollings, Ernest -36 > Johnson, Tim - 5 > Kerry, John - 19 > Kohl, Herb - 13 > Landrieu, Mary - 5 > Lieberman, Joseph - 13 > Lincoln, Blanche - 3 > Miller, Zell - 2 > Nelson, Ben - 2 > Nelson, Bill - 2 > Reid, Harry - 15 > Rockefeller, Jay - 17 > Schumer, Chuck -3 > Torricelli, Robert - 5 Mean : 9.6 Median : 5 Against > Akaka, Daniel - 12 > Bingaman, Jeff - 19 > Boxer, Barbara - 9 > Byrd, Robert - 43 > Conrad, Kent - 15 > Corzine, Jon - 1 > Dayton, Mark - 1 > Durbin, Dick - 5 > Feingold, Russ - 9 > Graham, Bob - 15 > Inouye, Daniel - 39 > Kennedy, Edward - 40 > Leahy, Patrick - 27 > Levin, Carl - 23 > Mikulski, Barbara -15 > Murray, Patty - 9 > Reed, Jack - 5 > Sarbanes, Paul - 25 > Stabenow, Debbie - 1 > Wellstone, Paul - 11 > Wyden, Ron - 8 Mean : 15.6 Median - 12 The group of senators that voted against the Iraq War had considerably more time in congress than the group that voted yes. Ted Kennedy and Robert Bynd led the charge on the "no" group, and that action would be a lot harder if they doesn\'t have the gravitas from 40+ years in the senate.', '>>{gameovar} : Is good idea taken from here in Motherland! When member of Duma is opposing Glorious Eternal President, will soon find self in conflict of term limit, also will be dead! (death is unrelated to conflict of course)', '>>{appmanga} : Trump is not 3/5th of the states, so their hopefulness might be unwarranted.', '>>{atchijov} : Considering that we have very very few good members and quite a few of really horrible ones... replacing the whole lot would probably improve average level.', '>>{acowwithglasses} : Why? It would de facto end the entire concept of career politicians, who are all in reality beholden to special interest groups.', ">>{leonardofind} : Mitch McConnell already said he would NEVER introduce it. So it's a fail attempt on their part.", '>>{leonardofind} : Are you saying their is no such a thing as being indispensable? Considering the great majority of congress members run unopposed, what choice do voters have.', '>>{leonardofind} : Is that why Trump is the way he is?', '>>{realtsuke} : if its 30 years then its 30 years. As long as the law is in the books it becomes easier to modify down the line. I will take it.', ">>{RayWencube} : But it wouldn't end politicians being beholden to special interests. To get elected and to get re-elected the maximum number of times, the politician would have to use those same special interests. The only time it might work is in that politician's last term. But then the politician has an incentive to curry favor to either get a preferred successor elected or to secure a job after that term. Meanwhile, it destroys the idea of legislators building expertise. It's a bandaid being applied to a wound that needs a hundred stitches, except you're putting the bandaid on someone else and also the bandaid is poison.", '>>{acowwithglasses} : Over time, these ties to specific interest groups will grow. That is why you see so called "revolving doors" in Washington, where individuals go back and forth between lobbying roles and being politicians. It\'s a horrible and de facto corrupt system. Of course it should be discarded.', '>>{SilverMt} : Voters could find someone to run against their incumbents. Citizens have a role in our democracy too, and people seem to have forgotten this.', ">>{SilverMt} : I disagree. I don't want to throw Bernie Sanders or my Oregon Senators out of Congress only to be replaced by newbies picked by the oligarchs.", '>>{atchijov} : Nothing will fix the congress if people will keep ignoring voting. If all eligible voters actually bother to show up and vote (and voted with they head... not with they guts)... there will be very little oligarchs could do to sway outcome.', ">>{ScholarOfTwilight} : The voters ARE the term limits. It's how everything is designed.", ">>{RayWencube} : The revolving door is not the result of long-serving congressmen. It's the result of a broken campaign finance system. Term limits only increases the necessity of a Rep. or Senator availing him or herself of the revolving door because they can't stay in government.", ">>{acowwithglasses} : The same problem is found in basically all western democracies. This is not due to a broken campaign finance system. If it was, you wouldn't see the same thing in Canada, UK, France, Germany, Australia etc.", '>>{arg_sy} : Or maybe those with power have just created similar systems in those other countries with the same flaws.', ">>{stvenkman420} : It might be unconstitutional as well. Such a law would presume the Federal government can deny the people's choice on who they want to represent their state in Congress.", '>>{acowwithglasses} : One of those flaws is unlimited terms, which adds to far too close relationships between certain interest groups and certain politicians.', '>>{leonardofind} : Right, you just have to come up with 45 million dollars. You have that in your pocket?'], ['>>{BoostMakesMeHard} : For everyone wanting to see what a Jet Black iPhone 7 plus looks like after running it caseless since day one.', '>>{mmy3rs0876} : So thankful I traded in the jet black for matte black', ">>{saullyj} : I don't think the phone is supposed to develop a patina like the leather case...", '>>{examinati0n} : I love it brand new but this hurts my eyes.', '>>{Un-trollable} : Looks cheap and bad tbh. Yeah, it feels better in the hand but those scratches would drive me nuts. Glad I chose matte black.', ">>{Jeph_2000} : I've been using a transparent case since day one and it still looks good as new", '>>{lemonviking} : Mine is exactly the same. The the smudges are more annyoing.', '>>{BoostMakesMeHard} : This was the worst possible angle. I can take another pic at a different angle to compare if anyone is interested. Also, to those wondering, this was shot with a Sony A6000 on the 35mm f1.8 lens', ">>{KittenSwagger} : What's to fix? Its a high gloss mirror finish. This is what happens...", ">>{hiepdn} : Absolutely right. I'm still using it though, not that I care about the phone's appearance, but it's good to be careful since I know I'm gonna drop the phone someday again.", '>>{ilovecreamcheese} : Also, it presumably was handled impeccably. It was never dropped nor stored in pocket with metal objects like keys.', ">>{Bigchile123} : It looks really good! Specially from that angle. I love it. I still wouldn't go careless, because life happens and things fall. And too the people who say it looks ugly, it's a phone people.", '>>{Seraphic_Wings} : This is why I bought the Champagne Gold In fact, Jet Black iPhones are the cheapest variant where I live LUL', ">>{Jeoyeyo} : I was doubting till the last day whether to get the jet black or the matte black one. Thank God I chose the latter! It looks horrible, to be honest. It also looks disgusting with a transparent case. And there's no point in getting the jet black if you're going to use a non-transparent case. Apple should fix this with the next generation.", ">>{AriCode} : I don't see apple doing another jet black situation again. It will either be aluminum or glass. The micro abrasions and smudges are bad, only if you can really see them in light.", ">>{rocketrex504} : It's just as bad on the top and bottom of mine has marks all over it", '>>{OfficialBattleX} : 5\' 3" over here, my iPhone 5s looks the same in my hands as the iPhone 7+ in your hands!', ">>{Vega-25} : I'm so glad I went with the regular black. Those scratches would've driven me insane.", ">>{HalfnHalfCoffeeJelly} : Even non jet black sucks. I don't know what my coworker does but I can see black paint worn away in the lower half of his iPhone 7.", '>>{NeverSkurred75} : Yup. I have matte black in a gorgeous case. I never have to worry about my phone and is always beautiful!', '>>{monoxl1} : Something to look forward too. Not one to use cases. Just delays the inevitable.', '>>{JimmithyWeav} : I just bought an iPhone 7 Plus Jet Black yesterday and I have to go a few days without a case until my midnight blue leather one comes in the mail. I love the way it looks and feels but I am afraid of this happening haha', '>>{hostmatty} : I thought it would look a lot worse. Yes, there are some scratches, but so what?', ">>{BoostMakesMeHard} : Wrong. I pick it up and put it down on my desk all day long. It touches rough surfaces all the time. Never dropped it because I'm an adult, but I don't baby it in the least.", ">>{rafael000} : I have a jet black using without a case since day 1 too. On this same angle and light I can see all the scratches, just like yours (maybe even worst), but 90% of the times you look at it, you can barely see any scratch, because the deep black masks them. also, this is the first iPhone I use without a case with confidence. the grip is great and the feeling of a caseless phone too (no lips around the screen). no regrets, I'm ok having the scratches in exchange for a better experience with the device.", ">>{Tackticat} : Mine's still like new just as it was delivered on 9/16/2016. I got a case. Jet Black, the best looking one of all.", '>>{Jeph_2000} : It looks better than full of scratches, plus I can take it off every week to admire the perfect jet black', ">>{MakeWar0813} : I actually love the way it looks, it isn't a leather patina but it has a unique personal look to it. I've got the matte black since day one and go back and forth between no case and apple leather case but it looks the same as everyone else's, I think yours is quite unique."]]

classify and reply

[">>{altuniverseyou} : The ONLY thing that's changed is that the right has stopped rooting against the American economy.", '>>{jbchickenhead} : I have been extremely pessimistic on the economy since November 8th at around 10pm.', '>>{malpais} : [NYT: Little Sign of a ‘Trump Bump’ in the Economic Forecast](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/29/business/economy/economic-growth-first-quarter.html) >Consumers are more confident. Stocks are up 5 percent since the start of the year. And from the president on down, there’s talk of a Trump bump. >The only problem: The boom is apparent everywhere except in the economic data. >It’s not that the economy is stalling — far from it. But with the first quarter ending Friday, growth in the first three months of the Trump administration is looking much the way it did under President Barack Obama. >In fact, experts see the gross domestic product in the quarter coming in at only about 1 percent, on an annualized basis — less than half the pace in the second half of 2016, and a far cry from President Trump’s own 4 percent target. >“There is a temporal disconnect,” said Ellen Zentner, chief United States economist at Morgan Stanley. “There has been an incredible rise in sentiment, but the proof is in the pudding.” >“The divergence is stunning,” she added, drawing a distinction between “soft data” like consumer confidence and “hard data” like retail sales...', ">>{The_Killing_Road} : In other news, I live in the real world with an actual view of this situation and I have been considering pulling my 6 figures from stocks before they drop in half their value and I'm kicking myself in the ass. But yeah, Americans positive about economy /s", ">>{R3d_Anonymous} : You should have bought put options or collars... People with synthetic short forwards and bear spreads will be happy, so it's not all bad.", '>>{robstak} : Should have? He hasnt missed the opportunity to yet.', '>>{MonkeysFanny} : Those that will still have jobs while this oompa loopma is still steering the ship....', '>>{o_zeta_acosta} : If you are running the hive mind doesnt it mean you are the queen? Seems pretty cool, ill do it.', ">>{strangeelement} : Yes, we've tried trickle down. But how about double trickle-down?", ">>{dolphins3} : Assuming this isn't bullshit from the Moony Times, which I'm guessing it is, a lot of Americans are stupid. The tourism industry is already imploding.", ">>{R3d_Anonymous} : It's called derivatives son. Educate yourself with McDonald's *Derivative Markets*.", ">>{Tito_Mojito} : On Mobile - can't read article cuz of soooo many F'ing ads blocking the page. Yay Adverclicking! /s", '>>{dolphins3} : People tend to not like news sources that are owned by cults.', '>>{TrumpLustsForIvanka} : You tried, sweety. You failed hilariously, but you tried. 😘', '>>{dammitpea} : Can we cross-poll these particular, positive Americans to see how many of them think it might be possible that Santa Claus is real?', '>>{R3d_Anonymous} : Yeah, well your articles are liberal propaganda a lot of the time too. Why do you guys get a pass and not us? Fucking hypocrites.', ">>{Patrico-8} : Seeing as how no changes have been made since the Obama administration, I'm gonna go ahead and call bullshit...Unless the article is talking about Mar a Lago's profits that is", ">>{Scoobys_Rectum} : Not so sure I know what a bear spread is...but I am pretty sure it won't make me happy...", ">>{R3d_Anonymous} : You write and purchase a call option, writing the lower-strike one and purchasing the higher-strike one, so that you have a controlled increase in payoff as the spot price of the stock at expiration decreases. EDIT: There's nothing political about this, but it's clear you guys aren't interested in learning anything. Keep wasting your lives circle-jerking and brigading lol", '>>{Apoplectic1} : Could just delete the post and ban you like T_D or /r/conservative, but here we actually believe in free markets. The free market has spoken here.', ">>{Apoplectic1} : Derivatives is a broad term that covers everything from put options to call options and more. It's called clarity son.", '>>{Kenny_Wayne_Shitbird} : The leftists on this board are down voting an article about economic confidence...', ">>{altuniverseyou} : OH NOES TWICE!! I don't even have the enthusiasm to go back and look at what we're talking about!!!"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{altuniverseyou} : The ONLY thing that's changed is that the right has stopped rooting against the American economy.", '>>{jbchickenhead} : I have been extremely pessimistic on the economy since November 8th at around 10pm.', '>>{malpais} : [NYT: Little Sign of a ‘Trump Bump’ in the Economic Forecast](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/29/business/economy/economic-growth-first-quarter.html) >Consumers are more confident. Stocks are up 5 percent since the start of the year. And from the president on down, there’s talk of a Trump bump. >The only problem: The boom is apparent everywhere except in the economic data. >It’s not that the economy is stalling — far from it. But with the first quarter ending Friday, growth in the first three months of the Trump administration is looking much the way it did under President Barack Obama. >In fact, experts see the gross domestic product in the quarter coming in at only about 1 percent, on an annualized basis — less than half the pace in the second half of 2016, and a far cry from President Trump’s own 4 percent target. >“There is a temporal disconnect,” said Ellen Zentner, chief United States economist at Morgan Stanley. “There has been an incredible rise in sentiment, but the proof is in the pudding.” >“The divergence is stunning,” she added, drawing a distinction between “soft data” like consumer confidence and “hard data” like retail sales...', ">>{The_Killing_Road} : In other news, I live in the real world with an actual view of this situation and I have been considering pulling my 6 figures from stocks before they drop in half their value and I'm kicking myself in the ass. But yeah, Americans positive about economy /s", ">>{R3d_Anonymous} : You should have bought put options or collars... People with synthetic short forwards and bear spreads will be happy, so it's not all bad.", '>>{robstak} : Should have? He hasnt missed the opportunity to yet.', '>>{MonkeysFanny} : Those that will still have jobs while this oompa loopma is still steering the ship....', '>>{o_zeta_acosta} : If you are running the hive mind doesnt it mean you are the queen? Seems pretty cool, ill do it.', ">>{strangeelement} : Yes, we've tried trickle down. But how about double trickle-down?", ">>{dolphins3} : Assuming this isn't bullshit from the Moony Times, which I'm guessing it is, a lot of Americans are stupid. The tourism industry is already imploding.", ">>{R3d_Anonymous} : It's called derivatives son. Educate yourself with McDonald's *Derivative Markets*.", ">>{Tito_Mojito} : On Mobile - can't read article cuz of soooo many F'ing ads blocking the page. Yay Adverclicking! /s", '>>{dolphins3} : People tend to not like news sources that are owned by cults.', '>>{TrumpLustsForIvanka} : You tried, sweety. You failed hilariously, but you tried. 😘', '>>{dammitpea} : Can we cross-poll these particular, positive Americans to see how many of them think it might be possible that Santa Claus is real?', '>>{R3d_Anonymous} : Yeah, well your articles are liberal propaganda a lot of the time too. Why do you guys get a pass and not us? Fucking hypocrites.', ">>{Patrico-8} : Seeing as how no changes have been made since the Obama administration, I'm gonna go ahead and call bullshit...Unless the article is talking about Mar a Lago's profits that is", ">>{Scoobys_Rectum} : Not so sure I know what a bear spread is...but I am pretty sure it won't make me happy...", ">>{R3d_Anonymous} : You write and purchase a call option, writing the lower-strike one and purchasing the higher-strike one, so that you have a controlled increase in payoff as the spot price of the stock at expiration decreases. EDIT: There's nothing political about this, but it's clear you guys aren't interested in learning anything. Keep wasting your lives circle-jerking and brigading lol", '>>{Apoplectic1} : Could just delete the post and ban you like T_D or /r/conservative, but here we actually believe in free markets. The free market has spoken here.', ">>{Apoplectic1} : Derivatives is a broad term that covers everything from put options to call options and more. It's called clarity son.", '>>{Kenny_Wayne_Shitbird} : The leftists on this board are down voting an article about economic confidence...', ">>{altuniverseyou} : OH NOES TWICE!! I don't even have the enthusiasm to go back and look at what we're talking about!!!"]]

classify and reply

['>>{BurnAllTheRedshirts} : Before taking the White House, Trump due in court over fraud', '>>{ZoneRangerMC} : Microsoft will pay you $650 to ditch your MacBook for a Surface', '>>{StNic54} : iPhone Apple ID Issue May spur Divorce [Humor]', '>>{Disturbedphenom} : Curious if any Mac user would even consider it. But not a bad option', ">>{wittyname83} : Teacher's aide fired after calling Michelle Obama 'a gorilla'", ">>{tiqr} : Winning the election has not changed my opinion of Trump in the slightest. He is, and will always be, a con-man. He gets by on bluster and bravado. He talks him self up, but rarely delivers. Almost all of his achievements are other people's work to which he has lent his name. About the only thing he achieved by himself is the Apprentice - a reality TV show premised on the notion that Trump is the ultimate business man. All part of his long con. Trump played the populist very well, and got enough Americans to buy into his latest scheme. But once he's the White House, he will have no one to scapegoat for his failures.", '>>{kekus_vult} : At least the label is not game designer but critic :D', ">>{dark_hymn} : I guessed Alabama, but it's Georgia. Boo me.", '>>{rockstarfish} : GOP pushes this non-sense since they can not compete on their own merit. R.I.P GOP', '>>{GaryRuppert} : Running as a Democrat in Massachusetts, a state with an all-Democrat Congressional delegation. Basically an unqualified candidate that gets free media for some reason', ">>{UrukHaiGuyz} : > he will have no one to scapegoat for his failures. He'll have every one of his past, current and imagined adversaries to scapegoat. Hell, his whole campaign was about scapegoating vulnerable minority groups.", '>>{Hurts_dont_it} : Yes, still might be. This fraud case is a civil matter. Understand the difference?', '>>{Lessthanzerofucks} : I love that you think a completely intentionally designed behavior is a "bug". Apple has never recommended sharing an Apple ID amongst multiple individuals. In other words, you\'re holding it wrong.', '>>{GaryRuppert} : the only way to really fix that "problem" would be to just double the offices and 435 male and 435 female members of Congress, and a male and female President and so on. But I suspect segregation by gender isn\'t their plan here', ">>{anti-saltmachine} : I heard she's getting a cameo in overwatch. which character? I don't know", '>>{deckyon} : Sounds like you all need Springer. But seriously, why is it so hard to get separate Apple IDs and then set up a family with them - at least then only the APPS can be shared, rather than everything else. This is just funny. A comedy of errors.', ">>{t88m} : Fraud being a civil issue is cute. But please be more disrespectful, it's *definitely* not what's wrong in the country.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : Not "Boo you" - smart guess. Wrong this time, but smart guess', '>>{jojowasher} : as they have done in the past to get $650 it will basically have to be a brand new macbook, notice it says \'up to"', '>>{TheTurge} : I like the ecosystem of MacOS and iOS, plus the way a lot of design and editing software works on it seems more thought out than what windows and some linux counterparts offer. I think the hardware can be a little steep, but when you compare a modern MacBook Pro 15" to an XPS 15 or other comparable device, it\'s right in the ballpark... It\'s really about OS preference anymore, and I\'d rather stay on a Unix-based platform with less room for exploits and fewer weird privacy choices that put Microsoft on my paranoia radar.', ">>{Cyberhwk} : I'm tired of these people saying all these bad things about me. Runs for Congress.", ">>{squaqua} : ...hasn't announced which district she wants to represent... Sums up much of what is wrong with American politics.", '>>{HR_Paperstacks_402} : Why do I picture Mr Slave from South Park?', ">>{sharinglungs} : > But Hillary was the criminal You mean she's been convicted of criminal activity? Or is this the guilty until proven innocent routine?", '>>{Xelif} : Some countries actually do that, or something like it - they require a certain proportion of seats in the legislature to go to women. For example, 24 of the 80 seats in the Rwandan Chamber of Deputies are reserved for women. (As of 2012, 21 women were elected to ordinary seats for a total of 45 out of 80, making Rwanda the only country in the world whose legislature has more women than men.)', ">>{t88m} : > Or is this the guilty until proven innocent routine? We've deviated from that? I thought the court of public opinion was where she's guilty because she's Hillary.", '>>{bad-coffee} : Yep. Would gladly hand over my 2008 MBP for $650 off a Surface.', ">>{pm_me_ur_screenshot} : It's pathetically desperate at best. They just don't get it. It's not about the money - at least no where close to those amounts.", '>>{outofplace_2015} : Yep. As he fails to do everything he said, (It seems his own supporters have forgotten his emphatic position that he would build a wall AND make Mexico pay for it), they will just use that to claim how bad the problem was in the first place.', '>>{WatchingDonFail} : “Effective Monday, Oct. 3, Jane Wood Allen has been relieved from duty and is no longer an employee of Forsyth County Schools,” her school district posted on Facebook. “Racism and discrimination are not tolerated in our school district. We are committed to ongoing staff training on the acceptance of all individuals.”', '>>{Boxxxen} : Maybe that was fairly rude of /u/Hurts_dont_it, but to be specific, Trump has to be taken to court by a local, state, or federal government, or else it is a civil trial and not a criminal one.', ">>{manuyzmani} : Hi, I also had this problem recently, like said before it isn't a bug but you can solve it easily: go to Settings/Messages/Send and receive, there you'll be surprised to see which option is checked ;) Just chose on each phone the respective phone number only and the cross calls/messages will end.", ">>{QueenAlise} : I have one of each and find the Mac to be far more stable. The Surface Pro has a terrible time switching between tablet and pc mode, screws up my icons every time it docks or undocks, isn't consistent with screen resolution on multi mon, and is overall annoying AF.", ">>{terraformtheearth} : Let the bile pour out fellow trailer park brethren!!!!!The world is on your side, quit bangin' your cousin long enough to gather the wheat from the chaff!!! Your can get back to humpin' cousin Trina when you've done your civic duty of smearing this chimp!!!! Ugghh, what have we become?", ">>{lectricx} : Time to get different Apple ID's i think.. Family sharing lets you buy apps and share them, without sharing calls..", ">>{IronicAntiHipster} : I'm not arguing for any side with this comment, just fyi. But i guarantee you are giving way way way more information to Apple when you use their products than Microsoft. Granted you're definitely giving Microsoft a lot of info when you use 10. That's why i don't use either!", ">>{Angriazz} : Apple resale value is amazing. If the announcements on Thursday aren't impressive for me I might just head to eBay for my sale then start looking for alternatives. Not exactly sure who this is aimed at but I guess it's like a car trade in at a dealership, you get less money but also less hassle.", ">>{TheTurge} : Apple is both pretty clear with what they collect and pretty granular with what you can separate from iCloud. I don't use much of the iCloud or Sync services within the Apple ecosystem, so their collection wouldnt' be much more than windows 7 era microsoft, I'd bet.", ">>{deeprogrammed} : Yeah, this isn't going to happen. Mark my words", ">>{radicalelation} : What Microsoft really needs to do soon is focus on software for their self-branded hardware. A big part of Apple's appeal is the ease of use and lack of issues with both their hardware and software. Bring that to Windows, which they've already begun with their own hardware, and you'll have proper competition with Apple. Especially now that they're marketing to the design crowd, which the Studio is definitely directly aimed at. Or they could partner with a handful of quality software developers for entry-level design program suites on Surface devices. Like the LT versions of some Autodesk applications, and serious peeps can always upgrade.", '>>{RIPGeorgeHarrison} : America could really use more carpetbaggers said nobody ever.', '>>{RCTID1975} : > The Surface Pro has a terrible time switching between tablet and pc mode How well does your macbook switch modes?....', '>>{mrslappydick} : I almost forgot about Nerdgate. You kids still mad about video games and girls or whatever.', ">>{LeDecline2016} : Hahahahahahaha at first it was actually running. No way, he won't actually run for president. Then it was winning a few states in his primary. No way, he's not going to win the nomination with all the Republicans against him. Then it was winning the presidency, no way will he win the presidency with the Democrats and the Republicans against him. He has done it. Because the people are behind him. He's going to make America great again and it begins with deporting the illegals and keeping our country safe from Muslim terrorists.", '>>{malpais} : Trump ^Trump^Trummp^Trummmmmp^fffffff......', '>>{GodfreyLongbeard} : Not a good comparison though. The real question, do you think bill Clinton will make a pretty first man?', ">>{Werewolf35b} : His macbook isn't trying. It does what it does, well. It's not trying to do something and failing, like the surface.", ">>{AroundTheMountain} : Why would you share Apple IDs? I've never heard of people doing that, what's the point?", ">>{StNic54} : I don't view it as holding it wrong. Why add a second or third apple id? It's just another account to maintain and password to remember. We've had iPhones for many years and this has never been a problem until now. So yes, bug.", '>>{Hurts_dont_it} : How was that rude? I asked a simple questio.', ">>{llDemonll} : Apple ID's are fine to share. iCloud accounts are not recommended at all. Apple ID is what stores your App Store history essentially, iCloud is what takes care of the messaging, calling, etc.", ">>{MowgliSpaceman} : I'm sure they're all looking forward to more notes on their looks from /u/tedshony.", '>>{montydad5000} : I stopped at "We use the same Apple ID." Anything that happens after that, you\'re pretty much asking for it. :-)', ">>{Lessthanzerofucks} : No, you're literally using the products incorrectly. You could inquire as to the proper way to do it, or read Apple's support documents on the matter, or just keep insisting you know what you're doing, which is demonstrably false.", ">>{s-car-go} : Sharing an apple id is better than family sharing. It has many benefits including an automatically shared photo stream. Find my iphone is a single tap to get familys whereabouts. The rest of the logins for gamecenter,facetime/imessege and app store can use seperate id's. Family sharing is nice for calender events but it mangles itunes cards balances and makes you do tedius steps to share pictures.", ">>{Deathoftheages} : Man here hoping Hillary won't be able to scapegoat people for her crimes.", ">>{LegendofWeevil17} : I'm a university student, I had the surface pro 3 for 2 weeks before I returned it and bought a MacBook Air. Really did not like windows 10 and the keyboard on the surface just really was inconvenient. You couldn't rest it on your lap or anything. Loved my MacBook so far.", ">>{LegendofWeevil17} : I'm a university student, I had the surface pro 3 for 2 weeks before I returned it and bought a MacBook Air. Really did not like windows 10 and the keyboard on the surface just really was inconvenient. You couldn't rest it on your lap or anything. Loved my MacBook so far.", '>>{Eddie_skis} : I have to agreee with this sentiment. I bought a display model 2013 MacBook Air (256gb upgrade) for ¥95,000 at the end of 2013, roll round to early 2016 I traded it in at a store for ¥70,000 cash. 2 and a half years use for around $250.', ">>{oamlsdraterscitilop} : Wow, you're so cool. Hope I can grow up to be like you some day :praying:", '>>{AH_MLP} : So what am I suppose to do when I want to use my Apple ID on my iPad and iPhone? Take advantage of this "bug?" It\'s a handy feature of Apple devices, and is incredibly easy to comprehend and use. It\'s like complaining that you and your wife receive each other\'s emails when using the same email account on different computers. Actually, it literally *is* that.', '>>{--em} : I saw "Forsyth County" in the comment above and all I could think was "Please, please, please don\'t be North Carolina!" We\'ve embarrassed ourselves enough this year.', ">>{takeashill_pill} : Yeah, that does not bode well for her at all. Look at the debate between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her primary opponent whose name I've forgotten already. She knew every inch of her district, every mayor of every tiny town. There's a lot of power in knowing local politics at an election of that level.", '>>{takeashill_pill} : The girl saying the thing about a game I like is why Trump won.', '>>{andre_macassi} : This is a common sentiment among white people over 50.', '>>{QueenAlise} : Perfectly. I pick up the iPad Pro and pen, write my notes, mark up PDFs, sketch, then sync it to my cloud storage. Never misses a beat.', ">>{StNic54} : We've always used 2 phones, an ipad, and an ipod on the same id, no troubles in the past. Only recently has it been such that the texts and call logs are shared even when phones are separated. It's annoying to have to register twice for the same service.", ">>{tiqr} : Let's check back in a few years and see how 'great' he's made American.", '>>{StNic54} : Less to keep track of, one less login and password to remember.', '>>{PMmeyour-Labia} : Good. Fuck her. She wants to criticize on policy or message, fine. Racist bullshit like this needs to be cut out and destroyed.', ">>{Hot_Food_Hot} : That's a big reason to not like your surface pro. The surface is a laptop that is designed like a tablet. I wouldn't like to use an ipad as a laptop either.", '>>{TheDaggestOfNabbits} : We need people with deep roots in our gerrymandered squigglemonster districts.', '>>{be_dang3rous} : Agree to disagree. For what I use my laptop for I appreciate my Surface way more than the MacBook air I gave to my fiance. I can easily switch from design to coding and back without issue. Surface and Macs have their niches and excel to those that use them for those purposes.', '>>{Final_Senator} : Is praying a higher or lower form of respect than fedora tipping?', '>>{Hua_D} : At least she can count on the gamergaters to give her more publicity.', '>>{thecolbster94} : For people who thankfully dont know, Its a label for a bunch of in-fighting on twitter that happened like 2 years ago now. Dont like a person in 2016? Mention the drama they got involved in 2014. I dont see much hatred anymore, maybe i just successfully cut myself out of it.', '>>{theoneandonlypatriot} : My MacBook was 3000$. No thanks Microsoft.', '>>{tomfooly} : Oh god I hope she runs, she comes with a lot of baggage. The election would be very entertaining to watch.', ">>{four-arms} : I mean I have a 2015 MBP and the job I'm hoping to lock down would give me a new one, I wouldn't necessarily be averse to trading my current one in for a surface. They're pretty fuckin smooth", ">>{tiqr} : Notice Hillary appears nowhere in my post. This is about Trump. He is what he is. Hillary doesn't factor into it. And you need to back into your conspiracy hole. Adults are talking.", '>>{TASagent} : As much as I\'d like to be able to say "I told you so" to Trump supporters in 4 years, I\'d still much prefer to have been completely wrong and have him somehow make some sort of positive impact. I don\'t *want* to see failure in order to feel vindicated, but Trump consistently reinforces that he\'s nothing but an idiotic demagogue.', ">>{StNic54} : Just rechecked it - my wife's phone is deselected. Has been since we first noticed the issue. Ah well, life goes on.", ">>{drtoszi} : From what I remember, the only part that irked me was how the person at the center of it all (I'm pretty sure it wasn't this girl)) was found to have had affairs with the reviewers for scores. The rest on both sides was just a clusterfuck, but that part was obviously bad. Though that's bad everywhere (movies, music, etc.).", '>>{utnow} : Lol. No. Not a bug. You are doing it incorrectly.', ">>{tomfooly} : To be fair, she says it's to not give an edge to her opponent. That said, she is famous from the internet. All it would take is a non paid summer intern a couple hours to find all the crazy stuff they need on her. Honestly, she is basically the left's Trump. Pretty thin skinned, yells sexism at any criticism, IIRC she even refereed to herself as batman at one point, earning her the name Bat-Wu", ">>{lonewolfncub3k} : This is the atmosphere that the GOP has created with birtherism, obstructionism, and support of Trump. They've cultivated voters with this mindset and made the alt-right feel emboldened. We're at a point where we could be taking some dangerous steps backward in race relations if both sides of the aisle don't come together and denounce this racism and let voters know it has no place in politics.", ">>{C0wabungaa} : Here's the thing though; those affairs were hardly confirmed, the whole thing never got above the level of hearsay. Made the thing even more of a headache-inducing clusterfuck.", ">>{four-arms} : I hate coding on Windows though. Oh, you're trying to set up a new environment? On Mac you type a line into the terminal and you're good. Windows has an hour of workarounds and then maybe works.", '>>{jewvenchy} : I have both a 2011 MacBook and a Surface Pro 3 for professional use (graphic design). I also have a Cintiq 13HD Touch (a Wacom pen tablet that uses external hardware). The Cintiq is not portable but it is a workhorse along with my MacBook. The Surface Pro is for doodling and fucking around. I love it for that, but I find it clunky (problems with software, updates, crashing and freezing). I am much more familiar with working on OSX, which in my opinion is better for design softwares. That being said, if I had a top of the line Surface as opposed to a upper mid level gen 3 I might use it for daily tasks. Screen is too goddamn small though.', ">>{sstumbles} : But the Surface runs the full OS, whereas the iPad only runs iOS. So that's not even really a comparison. A Surface is touted as being able to replace a laptop...so I don't think it's too wild to expect to be able to use it as such.", '>>{Egorse} : >"I\'m not going to feel good about making games for the next four years with Donald Trump in the White House," Wu said. "I wouldn\'t feel good about making things to distract us when so many terrible things are going on." Wouldn\'t social criticism Through Video Games be a more Powerful Tool then Running or winning in any of the the Congressional districts in Massachusetts that are already Democratic?', ">>{tiqr} : I'd like that too - but I have never seen anything resembling genuine altruism coming from that man.", '>>{Imthatjohnnie} : He will be the prettiest first man ever. Guaranteed.', ">>{Joe_Sons_Celly} : I am going to employ Trump-like restraint in not making fun of this teacher's appearance.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : > I am going to employ Trump-like restraint Thank you', ">>{iamsorry88} : I'm sure she provided a fantastic environment for her African American students", '>>{SJHalflingRanger} : That was Zoe Quinn, and none of the people conspiratorially linked to her actually published a review of her game.', '>>{dammitandre} : Now you know how floridians feel. At this point we\'re like "ok what county.... was it Polk again"', ">>{hammadurb} : It's good to see that racism is not being tolerated by the general public. These racists need to understand that just because there is a bigot is running for president, doesn't mean they can be vocal about their racism and think there will be no repercussions.", ">>{sstumbles} : Sometimes it's better to do without shit, than to do it shittily.", '>>{DougyAM} : Re. the womans rant on facebook... does she not know that presidential families continue to live very well after leaving office? Especially popular families who can tour and do all sorts of paid speeches and books etc. I cannot recall any family of a President "struggling" for money after they left office.', '>>{hookisacrankycrook} : A lot of people are talking about it. Believe me. People are talking and saying things about her looks and stamina.', ">>{userknamework} : >I am going to employ Trump-like restraint in not making fun of this teacher's appearance. I think it takes real courage for you to not mention her appearance.", '>>{hatrickpatrick} : I would have supported GamerGate **if** they had had the balls to be upfront and open about what they were protesting (politics and the imposition of social / cultural \'rules\' on writers by left wing reviewers, instead of focusing purely on entertainment value or lack thereof) but they were somehow intimidated by the very SJW movement they sought to attack and therefore tried to pretend they were something different. That, in my view, was why it was such a clusterfuck. In other words, if they hadn\'t adopted the "ethics in journalism" crap and had instead openly said "we don\'t want your fucking identity politics bullshit applied to something that\'s supposed to be purely fun and not taken seriously", they would have been a *lot* easier to support. They shot themselves in the foot by shying away from openly stating what they really believed in. I know a lot of people who would be cultural libertarians like myself, but shunned GG like I did because of the subsequent clusterfuck over what it actually was, and the militant element that developed as a result. If there was a pure, unadulterated and uncompromised campaign to stop identity politics and cultural authoritarianism, not just in fames but just in the media in general, a *lot* of non-GG supporters would happily get on board. In other words, they had a shot, but they chickened out of saying what they really meant and that alienated a massive, massive chunk of potential supporters.', '>>{Jun_Kun} : Anyone else think her face is a little unsettling?', '>>{Gonzanic} : I guess in her worldview, it\'s impossible to imagine a successful African American. Even if that person was the President (though I\'m sure she believe he wasn\'t legitimate), and clearly the First Lady being a lawyer must somehow have been an affirmative action fakery. They must think the Obamas must be going back to "living in hell," as the God Emperor says "they" all do.', ">>{Hot_Food_Hot} : I agree, and I'm not comparing functionality between the two, but rather comparison of the design. The keyboard for a surface is similar to an ipad with a keyboard. You can expect to run a surface pro like a laptop, but it's not a stretch for users to feel like they're holding onto a laptop. Ergonomically it's not the greatest.", '>>{SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATS} : There was never a single review of any of her products BTW. It was a lie made up to try and ruin her life and justify the death threats, stalking, and harassment she received.', '>>{linguotgr} : So anyone else think Trump pawned the medal by now?', '>>{SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATS} : The entirety of Gamergate is a professional victim. 10 fold as much as B Wu.', '>>{trustmeep} : What\'s actually pretty funny about this, is that this woman threw her job away over an incorrect statement (not just the racial slur). The President and family pay for their own vacations. Now, it\'s true that if the President takes a vacation (which is never really a vacation, just a change of scenery), there is a ostensibly a mobile "Whitehouse" traveling with him, including equipment and staff that *does* cost the tax payers more more per day. When Michelle Obama has a vacation, her entourage (security and otherwise) is the same (if not less) than when she travels on business.', '>>{red-moon} : > problems with software, updates They can keep their money.', ">>{jimbo831} : Look at this name-calling campaign you're running! We can't cal this woman exactly what she is. We have to pretend this is just normal and polite political discourse.", '>>{toekknow} : They just gave her favorable coverage and promoted her career over other devs since they were "friends" with her from the indie game dev conference circuit. (PAX, GDC, etc.) "Friends" is in quotes because in a few cases, they had intimate relationships with her - without disclosing that fact when they shilled for her...', '>>{redrumakm} : Forsyth County has a [rich history](https://youtu.be/WErjPmFulQ0)', '>>{rabidpeacock} : The only gorilla I see is the teachers aid. Woof.', ">>{quitegopping} : I'm surprised you crawled out of your safe space after Deplorable Donnies spiral to the bottom. Go back to your hole with the rest of the bigoted bottom feeders.", '>>{skewedpan} : Terrible, glad she was fired for racist comments. However, how is she fired over this while Trump continues to make racist comments and is running for president of USA???', '>>{ocawa} : And it will probably have to be a laptop priced well above $650', ">>{Stingray88} : I mean, the cheapest Apple laptop is $899, so that's not really a factor.", ">>{squaqua} : REALLY! After this cluster fuck of an election you want another entertaining one. I don't think my mind can take it.", '>>{one8sevenn} : Member when only conservatives attacked video games? I do.', ">>{kingdomdream} : If the surface pro did not come with such a premium price tag... I might actually do it as I really don't like MAC OS.", '>>{Argorash} : Honestly I have nothing but contempt for both sides of that argument. Games journalism was dead and forgotten before gamergate started feeding them traffic.', '>>{mrslappydick} : Welcome to how the world works for the most part.', ">>{MacroFlash} : My main reason for preferring a Mac as my work computer is that I can open it from a dead sleep and begin working almost immediately without any bullshit. I used to work for HP and was never issued a PC that didn't piss me off with bad drivers, shit build, horrible software. Macs have let me get to coding faster than any other laptop I've used. When it comes to desktops, I dig a self-built rig with all the OS's", '>>{Monkey_Chief} : They fixed the keyboard with the Surface Pro 4, but I can understand not liking the general design of the kickstand. As for the OS I greatly prefer Windows 10. I think it\'s just at the point of whatever you "grew up on".', ">>{TheRain} : The counterpoint to that argument is [Pramila Jayapal](http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/state-sen-jayapal-to-run-for-mcdermotts-7th-district-seat/) in Seattle, who didn't live in the congressional district she was recently elected to.", ">>{blueberrywalrus} : Also, $650 isn't even the best deal out there, various trade in sites offer up to $800 for the 2015 15'' Mac Book Pro.", '>>{KIMGUILFOILES_TITS} : being a video game maker gives u the same experience as being a billionaire massively successful executive for multiple decades', ">>{GoodRubik} : It's funny how macs are always thought of as being for the artist, who prefers form over function. I know tons and tons of developers that use macs (and no they're not iOS developers). I loved my mac, the cohesiveness of the software was unrivaled by windows or Linux. But this was 8+ years ago. Unfortunately I haven't kept up with it now, since my job forces us to use win/Linux.", ">>{futtinutti} : Brianna Wu wasn't exactly successful at making games. [Review of her Revolution 60 game on Steam](http://steamcommunity.com/id/lowtaxico/recommended/350200/) On Metacritic it received a user score of **2.2/10** That all considering she spent $200k++ on development.", ">>{SJHalflingRanger} : Inevitable on this subject. Most people (sanely) don't pay attention and the folks who care about it tend to be conspiracists.", '>>{Summamabitch} : Youll spend that saved money on repairs within the first two years. Not worth it.', '>>{supermans_alter_ego} : I would not change to Windows. My work laptop is a powerful Dell and I rarely turn it off because of the time it takes to start back up; my MBP is instant. I also have Windows 10 running on it and I can start my Macbook, and then Parallels with Windows 10, quicker than any windows machine I have seen start up or wake from sleep. Also, why would anyone want a touchscreen laptop? Getting even a single finger print on my MBP screen drives me nuts. I have an actual tablet for anything touchscreen I want, like drawing for example. I keep seeing the surface commercial (in the UK) which drives home the touch screen and drawing, but they look so awkward doing it as you cannot rest your palm on the screen like an iPad.', '>>{kenhoweuk} : This has to be the MacBooks best feature, everyday I think this and preach to local windows users about how much of their lives they waste, waiting for their machine to in sleep!', '>>{shtonkalot} : I assume the post above yours was referring to the price of the new Surface being purchased.', ">>{gladamirflint} : I would consider it, but there's this unsolved issue with Windows slowing down Launchpad light show speed, so I'm not going to sacrifice the fidelity of my performances for a faster everything else", '>>{Victator2113} : Free money *and* better computer hardware and software?', '>>{zmnatz} : I have a 2009 Macbook Pro (the last Core 2 one). I would definitely take them up on this offer', '>>{Brother46} : Would gladly hand over my SP2 for 650$ off a MBP.', ">>{sstumbles} : Ah, I understand. That is incredibly valid. I've often thought the same myself as I've wandered through Best Buy and played with them. I honestly wouldn't mind having either, but already having wrists that sound like popcorn at 26 just doesn't make that sound appealing. I will say, if the iPad Pro ran macOS, I'd probably already have one lol.", ">>{Stingray88} : I don't think so... He said laptop, which Macbooks are and surfaces are not.", ">>{Stingray88} : Up to $650 is what they're offering. That would be $0 for a 2009 model...", '>>{Stingray88} : I grew up on Windows, and that might be why I prefer Mac OS today.', ">>{zmnatz} : Well yeah. But a man can dream. It's still the laptop I use"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{BurnAllTheRedshirts} : Before taking the White House, Trump due in court over fraud', ">>{tiqr} : Winning the election has not changed my opinion of Trump in the slightest. He is, and will always be, a con-man. He gets by on bluster and bravado. He talks him self up, but rarely delivers. Almost all of his achievements are other people's work to which he has lent his name. About the only thing he achieved by himself is the Apprentice - a reality TV show premised on the notion that Trump is the ultimate business man. All part of his long con. Trump played the populist very well, and got enough Americans to buy into his latest scheme. But once he's the White House, he will have no one to scapegoat for his failures.", ">>{UrukHaiGuyz} : > he will have no one to scapegoat for his failures. He'll have every one of his past, current and imagined adversaries to scapegoat. Hell, his whole campaign was about scapegoating vulnerable minority groups.", '>>{Hurts_dont_it} : Yes, still might be. This fraud case is a civil matter. Understand the difference?', ">>{t88m} : Fraud being a civil issue is cute. But please be more disrespectful, it's *definitely* not what's wrong in the country.", ">>{sharinglungs} : > But Hillary was the criminal You mean she's been convicted of criminal activity? Or is this the guilty until proven innocent routine?", ">>{t88m} : > Or is this the guilty until proven innocent routine? We've deviated from that? I thought the court of public opinion was where she's guilty because she's Hillary.", '>>{outofplace_2015} : Yep. As he fails to do everything he said, (It seems his own supporters have forgotten his emphatic position that he would build a wall AND make Mexico pay for it), they will just use that to claim how bad the problem was in the first place.', '>>{Boxxxen} : Maybe that was fairly rude of /u/Hurts_dont_it, but to be specific, Trump has to be taken to court by a local, state, or federal government, or else it is a civil trial and not a criminal one.', ">>{deeprogrammed} : Yeah, this isn't going to happen. Mark my words", ">>{LeDecline2016} : Hahahahahahaha at first it was actually running. No way, he won't actually run for president. Then it was winning a few states in his primary. No way, he's not going to win the nomination with all the Republicans against him. Then it was winning the presidency, no way will he win the presidency with the Democrats and the Republicans against him. He has done it. Because the people are behind him. He's going to make America great again and it begins with deporting the illegals and keeping our country safe from Muslim terrorists.", '>>{Hurts_dont_it} : How was that rude? I asked a simple questio.', ">>{Deathoftheages} : Man here hoping Hillary won't be able to scapegoat people for her crimes.", ">>{tiqr} : Let's check back in a few years and see how 'great' he's made American.", ">>{tiqr} : Notice Hillary appears nowhere in my post. This is about Trump. He is what he is. Hillary doesn't factor into it. And you need to back into your conspiracy hole. Adults are talking.", '>>{TASagent} : As much as I\'d like to be able to say "I told you so" to Trump supporters in 4 years, I\'d still much prefer to have been completely wrong and have him somehow make some sort of positive impact. I don\'t *want* to see failure in order to feel vindicated, but Trump consistently reinforces that he\'s nothing but an idiotic demagogue.', ">>{tiqr} : I'd like that too - but I have never seen anything resembling genuine altruism coming from that man."], ['>>{kekus_vult} : At least the label is not game designer but critic :D', '>>{GaryRuppert} : Running as a Democrat in Massachusetts, a state with an all-Democrat Congressional delegation. Basically an unqualified candidate that gets free media for some reason', '>>{GaryRuppert} : the only way to really fix that "problem" would be to just double the offices and 435 male and 435 female members of Congress, and a male and female President and so on. But I suspect segregation by gender isn\'t their plan here', ">>{Cyberhwk} : I'm tired of these people saying all these bad things about me. Runs for Congress.", ">>{squaqua} : ...hasn't announced which district she wants to represent... Sums up much of what is wrong with American politics.", '>>{Xelif} : Some countries actually do that, or something like it - they require a certain proportion of seats in the legislature to go to women. For example, 24 of the 80 seats in the Rwandan Chamber of Deputies are reserved for women. (As of 2012, 21 women were elected to ordinary seats for a total of 45 out of 80, making Rwanda the only country in the world whose legislature has more women than men.)', '>>{RIPGeorgeHarrison} : America could really use more carpetbaggers said nobody ever.', '>>{mrslappydick} : I almost forgot about Nerdgate. You kids still mad about video games and girls or whatever.', ">>{oamlsdraterscitilop} : Wow, you're so cool. Hope I can grow up to be like you some day :praying:", ">>{takeashill_pill} : Yeah, that does not bode well for her at all. Look at the debate between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her primary opponent whose name I've forgotten already. She knew every inch of her district, every mayor of every tiny town. There's a lot of power in knowing local politics at an election of that level.", '>>{takeashill_pill} : The girl saying the thing about a game I like is why Trump won.', '>>{TheDaggestOfNabbits} : We need people with deep roots in our gerrymandered squigglemonster districts.', '>>{Final_Senator} : Is praying a higher or lower form of respect than fedora tipping?', '>>{Hua_D} : At least she can count on the gamergaters to give her more publicity.', '>>{thecolbster94} : For people who thankfully dont know, Its a label for a bunch of in-fighting on twitter that happened like 2 years ago now. Dont like a person in 2016? Mention the drama they got involved in 2014. I dont see much hatred anymore, maybe i just successfully cut myself out of it.', '>>{tomfooly} : Oh god I hope she runs, she comes with a lot of baggage. The election would be very entertaining to watch.', ">>{drtoszi} : From what I remember, the only part that irked me was how the person at the center of it all (I'm pretty sure it wasn't this girl)) was found to have had affairs with the reviewers for scores. The rest on both sides was just a clusterfuck, but that part was obviously bad. Though that's bad everywhere (movies, music, etc.).", ">>{tomfooly} : To be fair, she says it's to not give an edge to her opponent. That said, she is famous from the internet. All it would take is a non paid summer intern a couple hours to find all the crazy stuff they need on her. Honestly, she is basically the left's Trump. Pretty thin skinned, yells sexism at any criticism, IIRC she even refereed to herself as batman at one point, earning her the name Bat-Wu", ">>{C0wabungaa} : Here's the thing though; those affairs were hardly confirmed, the whole thing never got above the level of hearsay. Made the thing even more of a headache-inducing clusterfuck.", '>>{Egorse} : >"I\'m not going to feel good about making games for the next four years with Donald Trump in the White House," Wu said. "I wouldn\'t feel good about making things to distract us when so many terrible things are going on." Wouldn\'t social criticism Through Video Games be a more Powerful Tool then Running or winning in any of the the Congressional districts in Massachusetts that are already Democratic?', '>>{SJHalflingRanger} : That was Zoe Quinn, and none of the people conspiratorially linked to her actually published a review of her game.', '>>{hatrickpatrick} : I would have supported GamerGate **if** they had had the balls to be upfront and open about what they were protesting (politics and the imposition of social / cultural \'rules\' on writers by left wing reviewers, instead of focusing purely on entertainment value or lack thereof) but they were somehow intimidated by the very SJW movement they sought to attack and therefore tried to pretend they were something different. That, in my view, was why it was such a clusterfuck. In other words, if they hadn\'t adopted the "ethics in journalism" crap and had instead openly said "we don\'t want your fucking identity politics bullshit applied to something that\'s supposed to be purely fun and not taken seriously", they would have been a *lot* easier to support. They shot themselves in the foot by shying away from openly stating what they really believed in. I know a lot of people who would be cultural libertarians like myself, but shunned GG like I did because of the subsequent clusterfuck over what it actually was, and the militant element that developed as a result. If there was a pure, unadulterated and uncompromised campaign to stop identity politics and cultural authoritarianism, not just in fames but just in the media in general, a *lot* of non-GG supporters would happily get on board. In other words, they had a shot, but they chickened out of saying what they really meant and that alienated a massive, massive chunk of potential supporters.', '>>{SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATS} : There was never a single review of any of her products BTW. It was a lie made up to try and ruin her life and justify the death threats, stalking, and harassment she received.', '>>{SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATS} : The entirety of Gamergate is a professional victim. 10 fold as much as B Wu.', '>>{toekknow} : They just gave her favorable coverage and promoted her career over other devs since they were "friends" with her from the indie game dev conference circuit. (PAX, GDC, etc.) "Friends" is in quotes because in a few cases, they had intimate relationships with her - without disclosing that fact when they shilled for her...', ">>{squaqua} : REALLY! After this cluster fuck of an election you want another entertaining one. I don't think my mind can take it.", '>>{one8sevenn} : Member when only conservatives attacked video games? I do.', '>>{Argorash} : Honestly I have nothing but contempt for both sides of that argument. Games journalism was dead and forgotten before gamergate started feeding them traffic.', '>>{mrslappydick} : Welcome to how the world works for the most part.', ">>{TheRain} : The counterpoint to that argument is [Pramila Jayapal](http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/state-sen-jayapal-to-run-for-mcdermotts-7th-district-seat/) in Seattle, who didn't live in the congressional district she was recently elected to.", '>>{KIMGUILFOILES_TITS} : being a video game maker gives u the same experience as being a billionaire massively successful executive for multiple decades', ">>{futtinutti} : Brianna Wu wasn't exactly successful at making games. [Review of her Revolution 60 game on Steam](http://steamcommunity.com/id/lowtaxico/recommended/350200/) On Metacritic it received a user score of **2.2/10** That all considering she spent $200k++ on development.", ">>{SJHalflingRanger} : Inevitable on this subject. Most people (sanely) don't pay attention and the folks who care about it tend to be conspiracists."], ['>>{StNic54} : iPhone Apple ID Issue May spur Divorce [Humor]', '>>{Lessthanzerofucks} : I love that you think a completely intentionally designed behavior is a "bug". Apple has never recommended sharing an Apple ID amongst multiple individuals. In other words, you\'re holding it wrong.', '>>{deckyon} : Sounds like you all need Springer. But seriously, why is it so hard to get separate Apple IDs and then set up a family with them - at least then only the APPS can be shared, rather than everything else. This is just funny. A comedy of errors.', ">>{manuyzmani} : Hi, I also had this problem recently, like said before it isn't a bug but you can solve it easily: go to Settings/Messages/Send and receive, there you'll be surprised to see which option is checked ;) Just chose on each phone the respective phone number only and the cross calls/messages will end.", ">>{lectricx} : Time to get different Apple ID's i think.. Family sharing lets you buy apps and share them, without sharing calls..", ">>{AroundTheMountain} : Why would you share Apple IDs? I've never heard of people doing that, what's the point?", ">>{StNic54} : I don't view it as holding it wrong. Why add a second or third apple id? It's just another account to maintain and password to remember. We've had iPhones for many years and this has never been a problem until now. So yes, bug.", ">>{llDemonll} : Apple ID's are fine to share. iCloud accounts are not recommended at all. Apple ID is what stores your App Store history essentially, iCloud is what takes care of the messaging, calling, etc.", '>>{montydad5000} : I stopped at "We use the same Apple ID." Anything that happens after that, you\'re pretty much asking for it. :-)', ">>{Lessthanzerofucks} : No, you're literally using the products incorrectly. You could inquire as to the proper way to do it, or read Apple's support documents on the matter, or just keep insisting you know what you're doing, which is demonstrably false.", ">>{s-car-go} : Sharing an apple id is better than family sharing. It has many benefits including an automatically shared photo stream. Find my iphone is a single tap to get familys whereabouts. The rest of the logins for gamecenter,facetime/imessege and app store can use seperate id's. Family sharing is nice for calender events but it mangles itunes cards balances and makes you do tedius steps to share pictures.", '>>{AH_MLP} : So what am I suppose to do when I want to use my Apple ID on my iPad and iPhone? Take advantage of this "bug?" It\'s a handy feature of Apple devices, and is incredibly easy to comprehend and use. It\'s like complaining that you and your wife receive each other\'s emails when using the same email account on different computers. Actually, it literally *is* that.', ">>{StNic54} : We've always used 2 phones, an ipad, and an ipod on the same id, no troubles in the past. Only recently has it been such that the texts and call logs are shared even when phones are separated. It's annoying to have to register twice for the same service.", '>>{StNic54} : Less to keep track of, one less login and password to remember.', ">>{StNic54} : Just rechecked it - my wife's phone is deselected. Has been since we first noticed the issue. Ah well, life goes on.", '>>{utnow} : Lol. No. Not a bug. You are doing it incorrectly.'], ['>>{ZoneRangerMC} : Microsoft will pay you $650 to ditch your MacBook for a Surface', '>>{Disturbedphenom} : Curious if any Mac user would even consider it. But not a bad option', '>>{jojowasher} : as they have done in the past to get $650 it will basically have to be a brand new macbook, notice it says \'up to"', '>>{TheTurge} : I like the ecosystem of MacOS and iOS, plus the way a lot of design and editing software works on it seems more thought out than what windows and some linux counterparts offer. I think the hardware can be a little steep, but when you compare a modern MacBook Pro 15" to an XPS 15 or other comparable device, it\'s right in the ballpark... It\'s really about OS preference anymore, and I\'d rather stay on a Unix-based platform with less room for exploits and fewer weird privacy choices that put Microsoft on my paranoia radar.', '>>{bad-coffee} : Yep. Would gladly hand over my 2008 MBP for $650 off a Surface.', ">>{pm_me_ur_screenshot} : It's pathetically desperate at best. They just don't get it. It's not about the money - at least no where close to those amounts.", ">>{QueenAlise} : I have one of each and find the Mac to be far more stable. The Surface Pro has a terrible time switching between tablet and pc mode, screws up my icons every time it docks or undocks, isn't consistent with screen resolution on multi mon, and is overall annoying AF.", ">>{IronicAntiHipster} : I'm not arguing for any side with this comment, just fyi. But i guarantee you are giving way way way more information to Apple when you use their products than Microsoft. Granted you're definitely giving Microsoft a lot of info when you use 10. That's why i don't use either!", ">>{Angriazz} : Apple resale value is amazing. If the announcements on Thursday aren't impressive for me I might just head to eBay for my sale then start looking for alternatives. Not exactly sure who this is aimed at but I guess it's like a car trade in at a dealership, you get less money but also less hassle.", ">>{TheTurge} : Apple is both pretty clear with what they collect and pretty granular with what you can separate from iCloud. I don't use much of the iCloud or Sync services within the Apple ecosystem, so their collection wouldnt' be much more than windows 7 era microsoft, I'd bet.", ">>{radicalelation} : What Microsoft really needs to do soon is focus on software for their self-branded hardware. A big part of Apple's appeal is the ease of use and lack of issues with both their hardware and software. Bring that to Windows, which they've already begun with their own hardware, and you'll have proper competition with Apple. Especially now that they're marketing to the design crowd, which the Studio is definitely directly aimed at. Or they could partner with a handful of quality software developers for entry-level design program suites on Surface devices. Like the LT versions of some Autodesk applications, and serious peeps can always upgrade.", '>>{RCTID1975} : > The Surface Pro has a terrible time switching between tablet and pc mode How well does your macbook switch modes?....', ">>{Werewolf35b} : His macbook isn't trying. It does what it does, well. It's not trying to do something and failing, like the surface.", ">>{LegendofWeevil17} : I'm a university student, I had the surface pro 3 for 2 weeks before I returned it and bought a MacBook Air. Really did not like windows 10 and the keyboard on the surface just really was inconvenient. You couldn't rest it on your lap or anything. Loved my MacBook so far.", ">>{LegendofWeevil17} : I'm a university student, I had the surface pro 3 for 2 weeks before I returned it and bought a MacBook Air. Really did not like windows 10 and the keyboard on the surface just really was inconvenient. You couldn't rest it on your lap or anything. Loved my MacBook so far.", '>>{Eddie_skis} : I have to agreee with this sentiment. I bought a display model 2013 MacBook Air (256gb upgrade) for ¥95,000 at the end of 2013, roll round to early 2016 I traded it in at a store for ¥70,000 cash. 2 and a half years use for around $250.', '>>{QueenAlise} : Perfectly. I pick up the iPad Pro and pen, write my notes, mark up PDFs, sketch, then sync it to my cloud storage. Never misses a beat.', ">>{Hot_Food_Hot} : That's a big reason to not like your surface pro. The surface is a laptop that is designed like a tablet. I wouldn't like to use an ipad as a laptop either.", '>>{be_dang3rous} : Agree to disagree. For what I use my laptop for I appreciate my Surface way more than the MacBook air I gave to my fiance. I can easily switch from design to coding and back without issue. Surface and Macs have their niches and excel to those that use them for those purposes.', '>>{theoneandonlypatriot} : My MacBook was 3000$. No thanks Microsoft.', ">>{four-arms} : I mean I have a 2015 MBP and the job I'm hoping to lock down would give me a new one, I wouldn't necessarily be averse to trading my current one in for a surface. They're pretty fuckin smooth", ">>{four-arms} : I hate coding on Windows though. Oh, you're trying to set up a new environment? On Mac you type a line into the terminal and you're good. Windows has an hour of workarounds and then maybe works.", '>>{jewvenchy} : I have both a 2011 MacBook and a Surface Pro 3 for professional use (graphic design). I also have a Cintiq 13HD Touch (a Wacom pen tablet that uses external hardware). The Cintiq is not portable but it is a workhorse along with my MacBook. The Surface Pro is for doodling and fucking around. I love it for that, but I find it clunky (problems with software, updates, crashing and freezing). I am much more familiar with working on OSX, which in my opinion is better for design softwares. That being said, if I had a top of the line Surface as opposed to a upper mid level gen 3 I might use it for daily tasks. Screen is too goddamn small though.', ">>{sstumbles} : But the Surface runs the full OS, whereas the iPad only runs iOS. So that's not even really a comparison. A Surface is touted as being able to replace a laptop...so I don't think it's too wild to expect to be able to use it as such.", ">>{sstumbles} : Sometimes it's better to do without shit, than to do it shittily.", ">>{Hot_Food_Hot} : I agree, and I'm not comparing functionality between the two, but rather comparison of the design. The keyboard for a surface is similar to an ipad with a keyboard. You can expect to run a surface pro like a laptop, but it's not a stretch for users to feel like they're holding onto a laptop. Ergonomically it's not the greatest.", '>>{red-moon} : > problems with software, updates They can keep their money.', '>>{ocawa} : And it will probably have to be a laptop priced well above $650', ">>{Stingray88} : I mean, the cheapest Apple laptop is $899, so that's not really a factor.", ">>{kingdomdream} : If the surface pro did not come with such a premium price tag... I might actually do it as I really don't like MAC OS.", ">>{MacroFlash} : My main reason for preferring a Mac as my work computer is that I can open it from a dead sleep and begin working almost immediately without any bullshit. I used to work for HP and was never issued a PC that didn't piss me off with bad drivers, shit build, horrible software. Macs have let me get to coding faster than any other laptop I've used. When it comes to desktops, I dig a self-built rig with all the OS's", '>>{Monkey_Chief} : They fixed the keyboard with the Surface Pro 4, but I can understand not liking the general design of the kickstand. As for the OS I greatly prefer Windows 10. I think it\'s just at the point of whatever you "grew up on".', ">>{blueberrywalrus} : Also, $650 isn't even the best deal out there, various trade in sites offer up to $800 for the 2015 15'' Mac Book Pro.", ">>{GoodRubik} : It's funny how macs are always thought of as being for the artist, who prefers form over function. I know tons and tons of developers that use macs (and no they're not iOS developers). I loved my mac, the cohesiveness of the software was unrivaled by windows or Linux. But this was 8+ years ago. Unfortunately I haven't kept up with it now, since my job forces us to use win/Linux.", '>>{Summamabitch} : Youll spend that saved money on repairs within the first two years. Not worth it.', '>>{supermans_alter_ego} : I would not change to Windows. My work laptop is a powerful Dell and I rarely turn it off because of the time it takes to start back up; my MBP is instant. I also have Windows 10 running on it and I can start my Macbook, and then Parallels with Windows 10, quicker than any windows machine I have seen start up or wake from sleep. Also, why would anyone want a touchscreen laptop? Getting even a single finger print on my MBP screen drives me nuts. I have an actual tablet for anything touchscreen I want, like drawing for example. I keep seeing the surface commercial (in the UK) which drives home the touch screen and drawing, but they look so awkward doing it as you cannot rest your palm on the screen like an iPad.', '>>{kenhoweuk} : This has to be the MacBooks best feature, everyday I think this and preach to local windows users about how much of their lives they waste, waiting for their machine to in sleep!', '>>{shtonkalot} : I assume the post above yours was referring to the price of the new Surface being purchased.', ">>{gladamirflint} : I would consider it, but there's this unsolved issue with Windows slowing down Launchpad light show speed, so I'm not going to sacrifice the fidelity of my performances for a faster everything else", '>>{Victator2113} : Free money *and* better computer hardware and software?', '>>{zmnatz} : I have a 2009 Macbook Pro (the last Core 2 one). I would definitely take them up on this offer', '>>{Brother46} : Would gladly hand over my SP2 for 650$ off a MBP.', ">>{sstumbles} : Ah, I understand. That is incredibly valid. I've often thought the same myself as I've wandered through Best Buy and played with them. I honestly wouldn't mind having either, but already having wrists that sound like popcorn at 26 just doesn't make that sound appealing. I will say, if the iPad Pro ran macOS, I'd probably already have one lol.", ">>{Stingray88} : I don't think so... He said laptop, which Macbooks are and surfaces are not.", ">>{Stingray88} : Up to $650 is what they're offering. That would be $0 for a 2009 model...", '>>{Stingray88} : I grew up on Windows, and that might be why I prefer Mac OS today.', ">>{zmnatz} : Well yeah. But a man can dream. It's still the laptop I use"], [">>{wittyname83} : Teacher's aide fired after calling Michelle Obama 'a gorilla'", ">>{dark_hymn} : I guessed Alabama, but it's Georgia. Boo me.", '>>{rockstarfish} : GOP pushes this non-sense since they can not compete on their own merit. R.I.P GOP', ">>{anti-saltmachine} : I heard she's getting a cameo in overwatch. which character? I don't know", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : Not "Boo you" - smart guess. Wrong this time, but smart guess', '>>{HR_Paperstacks_402} : Why do I picture Mr Slave from South Park?', '>>{WatchingDonFail} : “Effective Monday, Oct. 3, Jane Wood Allen has been relieved from duty and is no longer an employee of Forsyth County Schools,” her school district posted on Facebook. “Racism and discrimination are not tolerated in our school district. We are committed to ongoing staff training on the acceptance of all individuals.”', ">>{terraformtheearth} : Let the bile pour out fellow trailer park brethren!!!!!The world is on your side, quit bangin' your cousin long enough to gather the wheat from the chaff!!! Your can get back to humpin' cousin Trina when you've done your civic duty of smearing this chimp!!!! Ugghh, what have we become?", '>>{malpais} : Trump ^Trump^Trummp^Trummmmmp^fffffff......', '>>{GodfreyLongbeard} : Not a good comparison though. The real question, do you think bill Clinton will make a pretty first man?', ">>{MowgliSpaceman} : I'm sure they're all looking forward to more notes on their looks from /u/tedshony.", '>>{--em} : I saw "Forsyth County" in the comment above and all I could think was "Please, please, please don\'t be North Carolina!" We\'ve embarrassed ourselves enough this year.', '>>{andre_macassi} : This is a common sentiment among white people over 50.', '>>{PMmeyour-Labia} : Good. Fuck her. She wants to criticize on policy or message, fine. Racist bullshit like this needs to be cut out and destroyed.', ">>{lonewolfncub3k} : This is the atmosphere that the GOP has created with birtherism, obstructionism, and support of Trump. They've cultivated voters with this mindset and made the alt-right feel emboldened. We're at a point where we could be taking some dangerous steps backward in race relations if both sides of the aisle don't come together and denounce this racism and let voters know it has no place in politics.", '>>{Imthatjohnnie} : He will be the prettiest first man ever. Guaranteed.', ">>{Joe_Sons_Celly} : I am going to employ Trump-like restraint in not making fun of this teacher's appearance.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : > I am going to employ Trump-like restraint Thank you', ">>{iamsorry88} : I'm sure she provided a fantastic environment for her African American students", '>>{dammitandre} : Now you know how floridians feel. At this point we\'re like "ok what county.... was it Polk again"', ">>{hammadurb} : It's good to see that racism is not being tolerated by the general public. These racists need to understand that just because there is a bigot is running for president, doesn't mean they can be vocal about their racism and think there will be no repercussions.", '>>{DougyAM} : Re. the womans rant on facebook... does she not know that presidential families continue to live very well after leaving office? Especially popular families who can tour and do all sorts of paid speeches and books etc. I cannot recall any family of a President "struggling" for money after they left office.', '>>{hookisacrankycrook} : A lot of people are talking about it. Believe me. People are talking and saying things about her looks and stamina.', ">>{userknamework} : >I am going to employ Trump-like restraint in not making fun of this teacher's appearance. I think it takes real courage for you to not mention her appearance.", '>>{Jun_Kun} : Anyone else think her face is a little unsettling?', '>>{Gonzanic} : I guess in her worldview, it\'s impossible to imagine a successful African American. Even if that person was the President (though I\'m sure she believe he wasn\'t legitimate), and clearly the First Lady being a lawyer must somehow have been an affirmative action fakery. They must think the Obamas must be going back to "living in hell," as the God Emperor says "they" all do.', '>>{linguotgr} : So anyone else think Trump pawned the medal by now?', '>>{trustmeep} : What\'s actually pretty funny about this, is that this woman threw her job away over an incorrect statement (not just the racial slur). The President and family pay for their own vacations. Now, it\'s true that if the President takes a vacation (which is never really a vacation, just a change of scenery), there is a ostensibly a mobile "Whitehouse" traveling with him, including equipment and staff that *does* cost the tax payers more more per day. When Michelle Obama has a vacation, her entourage (security and otherwise) is the same (if not less) than when she travels on business.', ">>{jimbo831} : Look at this name-calling campaign you're running! We can't cal this woman exactly what she is. We have to pretend this is just normal and polite political discourse.", '>>{redrumakm} : Forsyth County has a [rich history](https://youtu.be/WErjPmFulQ0)', '>>{rabidpeacock} : The only gorilla I see is the teachers aid. Woof.', ">>{quitegopping} : I'm surprised you crawled out of your safe space after Deplorable Donnies spiral to the bottom. Go back to your hole with the rest of the bigoted bottom feeders.", '>>{skewedpan} : Terrible, glad she was fired for racist comments. However, how is she fired over this while Trump continues to make racist comments and is running for president of USA???']]

classify and reply

['>>{NotaFrenchMaid} : Set a timer for 20 minutes does the exact same thing......', '>>{Orbj7934} : And I thought my 97 Chrome tabs was bad.', ">>{Institutionlzd4114} : Sometimes Reddit makes me feel like I'm the only person who closes tabs as soon as I'm done with them.", '>>{I_drive_all_over} : timer, 20 minutes works too edit: not sure why im being downvoted, it does work.', '>>{TehEmoPenguin} : Wait... there\'s a "close all tabs" shortcut?!', '>>{garib_rath} : So does, "hey siri, would you be kind enough to set a timer for 20 minutes"', '>>{chadathin} : Clearly the solution to your problem is to open a new tab.', '>>{ASREV} : You just changed my life. Apparently I had 116 tabs.', '>>{NYR99} : Saying "14 meatballs" does NOT set the timer for 20 minutes.', ">>{rsmseries} : I can't believe I just checked that to make sure", ">>{skepticdoubt} : Well he has insurance and a gofundme set up but it's a terrible shame. Liberals need to be more open about things like this.", ">>{xbreathexgx} : Siri doesn't have a battery. The iPhone does.", ">>{DonaldwewladTrump} : Haha remember which sub we are in. This won't get any up votes. I can't beleive how bias this shit sub still is.", ">>{ThatKingsFan} : There are dozens of us! Whenever I try to use my husband's phone I get overwhelmed by all the crap he has open. How he ever finds anything is beyond me.", '>>{dutch981} : Also, saying "set timer for 40 minutes" doesn\'t set the timer for 20 minutes.', '>>{Buttons111} : Why did I read this exactly five minutes after manually closing hundreds of tabs?', ">>{AlexTraner} : I've had to call Siri an idiot a few times now. I set the same timer three times a day 4 days a week and he still is a pain sometimes :O", '>>{sourwood} : Made me check too. Exactly 500. And it looks like that is the limit.', '>>{lulgate} : Dude! That is 97 unique processes. How big is your RAM? Lol', '>>{Buttons111} : About ten minutes. The hit box for the x to close each tab is very small so I kept accidentally opening tabs. Never again.', ">>{SooperModelsDotCom} : So true. Hillary Clinton didn't have a chance against President Elect Trump. So all of you Hillary lovers - don't hate the player; hate the game. He knew how to win; she didn't. And for that, I thank Him!", '>>{rufiogd} : You know that you can also swipe to the left to close tabs', ">>{skepticdoubt} : Yes, I'm a liberal but I immediately sort by controversial to see more rational opinions.", '>>{wickidclown17} : Here from r\\all and have android, but i thought it was funny when i was talking about google assistant and it kept opening, i told it to fuck off and it replied "sorry you feel that way, i can help send an error report if you\'d like"', '>>{DebussySIMiami} : I assume this makes Trump supporters happy. Or are they upset Anti-Trump people beat them to the punch?', '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : The dissecting of the voting bloc is getting ridiculous. But Hillary only got 25% of the pringles sour cream and onion vote! Obama got 45%! Newsflash- Obama got more votes in pretty much every imaginable demo , he clobbered the republicans , twice', '>>{jmnugent} : The people who did this were black-boot thugs (you can clearly see them in the various pictures of this incident). They were not 50yr old females wearing pink hats & pushing strollers.', '>>{slick_licks_dicks} : Now, I know Siri gets lots of flak... but it\'s impressive that she did manage to pull the important part of that command out and just ignore the rest. She could have said "sorry, I don\'t understand".', ">>{CKowalski} : As Siri lives on Apple's server, Siri doesn't care if you rip out the phone's battery. Siri would be glad if you did so, because it means one client less to serve. You see, Siri is so lazy that it never really does anything useful, other than asking that Google (or Bing) dude to search the web for what you asked.", '>>{CKowalski} : Or "Here\'s what I found on the web"', '>>{angrae} : Did you just capitalize "him" in reference to Donald?', ">>{Tridamos} : That's a disturbing thought. Explains a lot though. He's probably even vain enough to make a golden statue of himself to complete the analogy.", ">>{MrWhite} : When sentience happens, you'll be one of the first to be eliminated.", ">>{acestevezer0} : This is why we'll soon have an AI takeover.", ">>{NorbertDupner} : I'm pretty sure you're going to be disappointed about that.", '>>{Soldier-2Point0} : Shell trick you into believing you forgot to set the alarm for work.', ">>{Rantheur} : > Liberals need to be more open about things like this. I'm not going to ascribe a political leaning to the people who did this, but I know one thing for sure. They were [anarchists](http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=59185).", ">>{jack_bennington} : shit I didn't know long pressing that button will let you close all tabs!!", ">>{Jordy_Stingray} : This is the dumbest shit ever. Protestors causing property damage and being violent and whatnot discredit legitimate protest. Random acts of destruction serve no purpose and typically victimize people that are just trying to exist... I voted Hillary, and would proudly vote for her again. My wife was at the Women's March in DC this weekend. This type of pointless chaos just weakens the progressive cause.", ">>{Trayf} : Is *not* threatening Siri what I've been doing wrong all this time?", '>>{CKowalski} : To whom do you want me to send the message calling mom"?"', '>>{lukee910} : I go as far as not having anything on my desktop on my PC. It feels so clean.', '>>{famicomputer} : Me before I realised you could close all tabs in one go.', ">>{NoahFect} : Why don't you just take a stress pill and think things over?", '>>{enzyme69} : The tabs handling in Safari is pretty efficient. Supposedly unlimitied once we have 64 bit system. Use the image thumbs to check and close some tabs time to time. And also if you happen to use an Apple account on multiple device you can use other device to close tabs.', '>>{superbesssk} : >Liberals need to be more open about things like this. Anarchists =/= liberals.', '>>{MechanicalDreamz} : Truthfully I\'m a hardcore democrat, voted Hilary... But I knew who was going to come out on top. Trump supporters were more ravenous, they came off as more well inspired... while us poor dems were like "I guess I\'ll vote Hillary..."', ">>{superbesssk} : >I'm a liberal Doubtful. >more rational opinions false", ">>{HilaryHasAHugeVagina} : she was the most disliked candidate in american history, only tied/beat by trump himself. she is and has always been the opposite of inspiring. she is the epitome of a corporate third way establishment neo-liberal in a climate seeking the exact opposite. we were shown her collusion, and coercion with the media and dnc to ensure her winning the nomination while she at the same time told a massive portion of the most energetic base she didn't need them to win. instead of trying to rally the sanders supporters who broke all small donation records, who showed up by the tens of thousands to sanders rallies, she told them she doesn't need them and will make no concessions to gain their support.", ">>{maejsh} : Damn, I just closed down 200+ tabs yesterday, wish I'd been enlightened then.", ">>{SirKarp} : Play Burial At Sea, I'm referring to Bioshock lol", '>>{WarPhalange} : >rational opinions >>assuming controversial opinions are more rational Wow... no self awareness...', '>>{anisaerah} : Um. They would be very offended at being called liberals lol', ">>{Akantares} : >iPhone >rip out the battery Well meme'd my friend", '>>{HilaryHasAHugeVagina} : hillary is the only candidate trump could have beat.', '>>{aarond12} : Normally Siri chides me for using foul language, but last night I said, "Siri, turn off the fucking lights" and she did.', ">>{DrunkyMcKrankentroll} : Also, she treated literally everyone with contempt over the email scandal. She's nothing but a typical scumbag lawyer with delusions of grandeur.", ">>{WeAllWillDie} : Don't let anarchist shitheads co-op and ruin the message of what was a very successful peaceful protest. >Ashraf (limo driver) noted that the Women’s March on Washington and in other cities around the country was a model for how to peacefully protest.", ">>{Bumblelicious} : > she told them she doesn't need them and will make no concessions to gain their support. Well, there's the non binding platform that no one reads. That was a big concession they keep telling me.", ">>{mitchmatch1} : See that's just the thing! He doesn't need to find anything, because he will just open a new tab regardless of how many of the same thing he has open already.", ">>{LAmoderate7} : Also should note that the Women's march was the day after the protest where he car was set ablaze", '>>{Shadow647} : ..unless they are suspended/unloaded from memory.', ">>{heelspider} : Yep once the existence of agent provocateurs is proven before an event even starts, it's pretty obvious who the culprits are.", ">>{Jordy_Stingray} : No they're not. I see how reading my comment would give you the impression that that's what I meant though. But both directly after the election and during the inauguration anarchists wreaked havoc during progressive demonstrations. The media doesn't do a good job of making a distinction, and it helps to galvanize bitterness on the right instead of strengthening the liberal message.", '>>{GunzGoPew} : 1) biased. 2) those guys were anarchists.', '>>{adrianisprettyfine} : man, i thought i was such a piece of shit for 64 tabs. Thank you.', '>>{LBullingdon} : The article states the arsonists were trump supporters. That is a "creative" headline.', '>>{lulgate} : What do you mean? How do you suspend a tab?', ">>{Incerae} : I close most of my tabs. Things I want to save for later but don't want to bookmark go in private so they don't clutter it, and one or two sites that I am always on are always open.", '>>{D_S876} : I wish safari actually showed you how many tabs you had like chrome did (as in show a number somewhere visible but out of the way.)', '>>{Baygo22} : Must be one of those "alternative facts" I keep hearing about, like TPP = Good.', ">>{WarPhalange} : I'm pointing out how illogical your statement is, despite wanting something logical.", '>>{pantsoff} : > How big is your RAM? Lol [BIG](http://i.imgur.com/7Vq5JdT.jpg)', '>>{L4xeus} : I used to never close tabs on Safari, just opened another tab with 3D Touch. I remember the limit in iOS9 was 100, then in iOS10 they increased it to 500. After 500 I needed to clear it.', ">>{alexanthopolous} : Well I agree it is not representative of hardly any Democrats, but it's still massively ironic considering all the rhetoric about how Trump and his supporters are literally Hitler. Just like it's funny for Madonna to complain her words are being taken literally or out of context when that is done all the time with Trump.", ">>{Droid1xy} : I never close my tabs. My wife hates it. She has 1 tab open which is one I opened and in the search box I left her a love note. She won't ever close that tab but before that she closed every single one ! Strange woman.", '>>{idiosidiot} : your nickname is a lie! you know nothing about buttons :P', '>>{08830} : Whaaaat? I lose my shit if more than 6-7 tabs are open.', '>>{idiosidiot} : I feel the compulsive need to close them all.', '>>{bochelles} : You changed my life just now. I had 400 open lol', '>>{mrcaptncrunch} : With multiple fingers you can swipe left and close multiple tabs at a time', '>>{rufiogd} : Less practical and you may look kinda funny doing it but sure.', '>>{cipher29} : Long press on the double square thing in the bottom right corner in safari.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{SooperModelsDotCom} : So true. Hillary Clinton didn't have a chance against President Elect Trump. So all of you Hillary lovers - don't hate the player; hate the game. He knew how to win; she didn't. And for that, I thank Him!", '>>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : The dissecting of the voting bloc is getting ridiculous. But Hillary only got 25% of the pringles sour cream and onion vote! Obama got 45%! Newsflash- Obama got more votes in pretty much every imaginable demo , he clobbered the republicans , twice', '>>{angrae} : Did you just capitalize "him" in reference to Donald?', ">>{Tridamos} : That's a disturbing thought. Explains a lot though. He's probably even vain enough to make a golden statue of himself to complete the analogy.", ">>{NorbertDupner} : I'm pretty sure you're going to be disappointed about that.", '>>{MechanicalDreamz} : Truthfully I\'m a hardcore democrat, voted Hilary... But I knew who was going to come out on top. Trump supporters were more ravenous, they came off as more well inspired... while us poor dems were like "I guess I\'ll vote Hillary..."', ">>{HilaryHasAHugeVagina} : she was the most disliked candidate in american history, only tied/beat by trump himself. she is and has always been the opposite of inspiring. she is the epitome of a corporate third way establishment neo-liberal in a climate seeking the exact opposite. we were shown her collusion, and coercion with the media and dnc to ensure her winning the nomination while she at the same time told a massive portion of the most energetic base she didn't need them to win. instead of trying to rally the sanders supporters who broke all small donation records, who showed up by the tens of thousands to sanders rallies, she told them she doesn't need them and will make no concessions to gain their support.", '>>{HilaryHasAHugeVagina} : hillary is the only candidate trump could have beat.', ">>{DrunkyMcKrankentroll} : Also, she treated literally everyone with contempt over the email scandal. She's nothing but a typical scumbag lawyer with delusions of grandeur.", ">>{Bumblelicious} : > she told them she doesn't need them and will make no concessions to gain their support. Well, there's the non binding platform that no one reads. That was a big concession they keep telling me."], [">>{skepticdoubt} : Well he has insurance and a gofundme set up but it's a terrible shame. Liberals need to be more open about things like this.", ">>{DonaldwewladTrump} : Haha remember which sub we are in. This won't get any up votes. I can't beleive how bias this shit sub still is.", ">>{skepticdoubt} : Yes, I'm a liberal but I immediately sort by controversial to see more rational opinions.", '>>{DebussySIMiami} : I assume this makes Trump supporters happy. Or are they upset Anti-Trump people beat them to the punch?', '>>{jmnugent} : The people who did this were black-boot thugs (you can clearly see them in the various pictures of this incident). They were not 50yr old females wearing pink hats & pushing strollers.', ">>{Rantheur} : > Liberals need to be more open about things like this. I'm not going to ascribe a political leaning to the people who did this, but I know one thing for sure. They were [anarchists](http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=59185).", ">>{Jordy_Stingray} : This is the dumbest shit ever. Protestors causing property damage and being violent and whatnot discredit legitimate protest. Random acts of destruction serve no purpose and typically victimize people that are just trying to exist... I voted Hillary, and would proudly vote for her again. My wife was at the Women's March in DC this weekend. This type of pointless chaos just weakens the progressive cause.", '>>{superbesssk} : >Liberals need to be more open about things like this. Anarchists =/= liberals.', ">>{superbesssk} : >I'm a liberal Doubtful. >more rational opinions false", '>>{WarPhalange} : >rational opinions >>assuming controversial opinions are more rational Wow... no self awareness...', '>>{anisaerah} : Um. They would be very offended at being called liberals lol', ">>{WeAllWillDie} : Don't let anarchist shitheads co-op and ruin the message of what was a very successful peaceful protest. >Ashraf (limo driver) noted that the Women’s March on Washington and in other cities around the country was a model for how to peacefully protest.", ">>{LAmoderate7} : Also should note that the Women's march was the day after the protest where he car was set ablaze", ">>{heelspider} : Yep once the existence of agent provocateurs is proven before an event even starts, it's pretty obvious who the culprits are.", ">>{Jordy_Stingray} : No they're not. I see how reading my comment would give you the impression that that's what I meant though. But both directly after the election and during the inauguration anarchists wreaked havoc during progressive demonstrations. The media doesn't do a good job of making a distinction, and it helps to galvanize bitterness on the right instead of strengthening the liberal message.", '>>{GunzGoPew} : 1) biased. 2) those guys were anarchists.', '>>{LBullingdon} : The article states the arsonists were trump supporters. That is a "creative" headline.', '>>{Baygo22} : Must be one of those "alternative facts" I keep hearing about, like TPP = Good.', ">>{WarPhalange} : I'm pointing out how illogical your statement is, despite wanting something logical.", ">>{alexanthopolous} : Well I agree it is not representative of hardly any Democrats, but it's still massively ironic considering all the rhetoric about how Trump and his supporters are literally Hitler. Just like it's funny for Madonna to complain her words are being taken literally or out of context when that is done all the time with Trump."], ['>>{NotaFrenchMaid} : Set a timer for 20 minutes does the exact same thing......', '>>{I_drive_all_over} : timer, 20 minutes works too edit: not sure why im being downvoted, it does work.', '>>{garib_rath} : So does, "hey siri, would you be kind enough to set a timer for 20 minutes"', '>>{NYR99} : Saying "14 meatballs" does NOT set the timer for 20 minutes.', ">>{rsmseries} : I can't believe I just checked that to make sure", ">>{xbreathexgx} : Siri doesn't have a battery. The iPhone does.", '>>{dutch981} : Also, saying "set timer for 40 minutes" doesn\'t set the timer for 20 minutes.', ">>{AlexTraner} : I've had to call Siri an idiot a few times now. I set the same timer three times a day 4 days a week and he still is a pain sometimes :O", '>>{wickidclown17} : Here from r\\all and have android, but i thought it was funny when i was talking about google assistant and it kept opening, i told it to fuck off and it replied "sorry you feel that way, i can help send an error report if you\'d like"', '>>{slick_licks_dicks} : Now, I know Siri gets lots of flak... but it\'s impressive that she did manage to pull the important part of that command out and just ignore the rest. She could have said "sorry, I don\'t understand".', ">>{CKowalski} : As Siri lives on Apple's server, Siri doesn't care if you rip out the phone's battery. Siri would be glad if you did so, because it means one client less to serve. You see, Siri is so lazy that it never really does anything useful, other than asking that Google (or Bing) dude to search the web for what you asked.", '>>{CKowalski} : Or "Here\'s what I found on the web"', ">>{MrWhite} : When sentience happens, you'll be one of the first to be eliminated.", ">>{acestevezer0} : This is why we'll soon have an AI takeover.", '>>{Soldier-2Point0} : Shell trick you into believing you forgot to set the alarm for work.', ">>{Trayf} : Is *not* threatening Siri what I've been doing wrong all this time?", '>>{CKowalski} : To whom do you want me to send the message calling mom"?"', ">>{NoahFect} : Why don't you just take a stress pill and think things over?", ">>{SirKarp} : Play Burial At Sea, I'm referring to Bioshock lol", ">>{Akantares} : >iPhone >rip out the battery Well meme'd my friend", '>>{aarond12} : Normally Siri chides me for using foul language, but last night I said, "Siri, turn off the fucking lights" and she did.'], ['>>{Orbj7934} : And I thought my 97 Chrome tabs was bad.', ">>{Institutionlzd4114} : Sometimes Reddit makes me feel like I'm the only person who closes tabs as soon as I'm done with them.", '>>{TehEmoPenguin} : Wait... there\'s a "close all tabs" shortcut?!', '>>{chadathin} : Clearly the solution to your problem is to open a new tab.', '>>{ASREV} : You just changed my life. Apparently I had 116 tabs.', ">>{ThatKingsFan} : There are dozens of us! Whenever I try to use my husband's phone I get overwhelmed by all the crap he has open. How he ever finds anything is beyond me.", '>>{Buttons111} : Why did I read this exactly five minutes after manually closing hundreds of tabs?', '>>{sourwood} : Made me check too. Exactly 500. And it looks like that is the limit.', '>>{lulgate} : Dude! That is 97 unique processes. How big is your RAM? Lol', '>>{Buttons111} : About ten minutes. The hit box for the x to close each tab is very small so I kept accidentally opening tabs. Never again.', '>>{rufiogd} : You know that you can also swipe to the left to close tabs', ">>{jack_bennington} : shit I didn't know long pressing that button will let you close all tabs!!", '>>{lukee910} : I go as far as not having anything on my desktop on my PC. It feels so clean.', '>>{famicomputer} : Me before I realised you could close all tabs in one go.', '>>{enzyme69} : The tabs handling in Safari is pretty efficient. Supposedly unlimitied once we have 64 bit system. Use the image thumbs to check and close some tabs time to time. And also if you happen to use an Apple account on multiple device you can use other device to close tabs.', ">>{maejsh} : Damn, I just closed down 200+ tabs yesterday, wish I'd been enlightened then.", ">>{mitchmatch1} : See that's just the thing! He doesn't need to find anything, because he will just open a new tab regardless of how many of the same thing he has open already.", '>>{Shadow647} : ..unless they are suspended/unloaded from memory.', '>>{adrianisprettyfine} : man, i thought i was such a piece of shit for 64 tabs. Thank you.', '>>{lulgate} : What do you mean? How do you suspend a tab?', ">>{Incerae} : I close most of my tabs. Things I want to save for later but don't want to bookmark go in private so they don't clutter it, and one or two sites that I am always on are always open.", '>>{D_S876} : I wish safari actually showed you how many tabs you had like chrome did (as in show a number somewhere visible but out of the way.)', '>>{pantsoff} : > How big is your RAM? Lol [BIG](http://i.imgur.com/7Vq5JdT.jpg)', '>>{L4xeus} : I used to never close tabs on Safari, just opened another tab with 3D Touch. I remember the limit in iOS9 was 100, then in iOS10 they increased it to 500. After 500 I needed to clear it.', ">>{Droid1xy} : I never close my tabs. My wife hates it. She has 1 tab open which is one I opened and in the search box I left her a love note. She won't ever close that tab but before that she closed every single one ! Strange woman.", '>>{idiosidiot} : your nickname is a lie! you know nothing about buttons :P', '>>{08830} : Whaaaat? I lose my shit if more than 6-7 tabs are open.', '>>{idiosidiot} : I feel the compulsive need to close them all.', '>>{bochelles} : You changed my life just now. I had 400 open lol', '>>{mrcaptncrunch} : With multiple fingers you can swipe left and close multiple tabs at a time', '>>{rufiogd} : Less practical and you may look kinda funny doing it but sure.', '>>{cipher29} : Long press on the double square thing in the bottom right corner in safari.']]

classify and reply

[">>{missmegz1492} : Donald Trump's 'Undercover' Supporters: A Short History of Candidates Saying 'Hidden' Voters Will Save Them.", '>>{missmegz1492} : > "Romney felt so good he didn’t even write a concession speech until that evening, when the writing was on the wall. Just as for McGovern, Mondale, and Dukakis, the crowd was a mirage, and Romney lost. A campaign adviser told CBS that running mate Paul Ryan was “genuinely shocked.” In his case, it turned out there had been a hidden vote—but it was for Obama. The Romney campaign underestimated the number of minority voters who would turn out.', '>>{valenzetti} : At Mar-a-Lago, Trump tackles crisis diplomacy at close range', ">>{valenzetti} : > As Mar-a-Lago's wealthy members looked on from their tables, and with a keyboard player crooning in the background, Trump and Abe's evening meal quickly morphed into a strategy session, the decision-making on full view to fellow diners, who described it in detail to CNN. [...] > The patio was lit only with candles and moonlight, so aides used the camera lights on their phones to help the stone-faced Trump and Abe read through the documents. But her emails.", '>>{lambu_ata} : Trump: Toyota Faces Big Tax if it Builds Corolla Cars for U.S. in Mexico', ">>{ManiaforBeatles} : De Blasio says Chelsea explosion was an 'intentional act'", '>>{drucifer27} : WikiLeaks Doesn’t Care It’s Naming Teenage Rape Victims And Outing People', ">>{DickButtwoman} : Holy fuck, if I were a spy, I'd just set up somewhere with a camera. They didn't even use a tent?", ">>{YouShouldBeOut} : But the police are still investigating, where's the outrage at this Democrat for speaking out of turn without all the facts? Oh, right, manufactured outrage is only a thing if Trump says something about it.", ">>{lambu_ata} : Trump is a true American patriot. I'm sure he will be a great President", '>>{The_cuckmaker} : >"Toyota President Akio Toyoda said in Japan on Thursday that the automaker has no immediate plans to curb production in Mexico, preferring to wait until after Trump\'s Jan. 20 inauguration before deciding whether to make any changes." Translation: fuck you', '>>{roboboogienights} : >There are millions of people out there that are afraid to admit they’re going to vote for Donald Trump.” Why not? “They’re going to get bashed by their liberal friends!” This is hilarious. Like trump supporters are wallflowers who whisper only when spoken to and never share their opinions. The total opposite of the Trump supporters I know!', '>>{rwilso7} : Every poll showed Brexit losing also. That doesn\'t there is a " secret " Trump vote, but there sure could be.', ">>{d_c_d_} : I have an undying love for baseball, but I don't think I'd do very well in the majors.", '>>{Ninel56} : The funny thing is, such actions will only discourage businesses from further deals with the US.', '>>{missmegz1492} : I do think that there are voters out there who are embarrassed to admit they are going to vote for Trump, but enough to sway the election?? No.', ">>{Ratermelon} : Wikileaks releases files as they come. I don't see why anyone is surprised. I would prefer that they try to protect the little guy, but that's not how they operate. Edit: Wikileaks has released some redacted information in the past when working with other media organizations.", '>>{gamechanger55} : Do you have a thing for terrorism so you can go bash American muslims for another month?', '>>{drucifer27} : From WikiLeaks? Yeah, they need to own up to their bullshit.', ">>{frackpot} : you must have a different definition of patriot than I do, or you don't know trump's history.", '>>{bbiggs32} : Yes he is. He\'s going to put "the USA in recession again."', '>>{TrippleTonyHawk} : what\'s huffpost\'s response to these two tweets from wikileaks? >No, WikiLeaks did not disclose "gays" to the Saudi govt. Data is from govt & not leaked by us. Story from 2015. Re-run now due to election. [(1)](https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/768134865049030656) - >.@WikiLeaks didn\'t upload the #AKP files with the private info on Turkish women - I did (and they\'ve been removed) >-Michael Best [(2)](https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/768080541547696128)', ">>{golikehellmachine} : It's almost like all of the noise about Clinton's emails *wasn't* about government security policy.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : Oh, I'd be willing to bet there was a lot of that going on. Amongst other things, Trump's insistence on staying at Mar-A-Lago was a big fucking billboard that said SPIES WELCOME HERE.", '>>{drucifer27} : If you\'d read the article you\'d know: >(Regarding the claim of “recycled” material, WikiLeaks stated in a second tweet the story is a re-run of a narrative from 2015, surfacing now because of the U.S. presidential election. It isn’t: The two stories are vastly different.) And that quote in the article has a link to the story that is supposedly being "re-run".', ">>{Produceher} : As someone who has a Facebook account, I can say for sure that Trump supporters don't STFU", ">>{h3rring} : Can't the same be said for Clinton? Anecdotally, I know a bunch of religious white women who would never dare breathe a word about voting for Clinton to their husbands.", '>>{MTL9} : That\'s cool. It\'s the "Winter White House" now. I\'m sure it\'s very secure... /s', ">>{loki8481} : as the Mayor of NYC, it seems safe to assume that de Blasio is working directly with the officials on the scene and has information available that Trump in the middle of a rally doesn't.", ">>{SortaVeg} : 1) Now the public knows and they and their families face severe backlash from the general population if the government hasn't already done so. 2) Wikileaks featured them prominently on their website and that's not who the Internet works (simply removing them).", '>>{pseudolocus} : Yep, my twenty year old Corolla has only needed minor maintenance and repair of stuff like hoses and corroded battery parts. And its driven cross country multiple times. Also it was made in Canada...', '>>{meowskywalker} : Ignoring the fact that if you\'re embarrassed to tell another human being who you\'re voting for, that seems like a pretty good sign you shouldn\'t be voting for them, is this a real issues in polling? I mean, it\'s one thing to tell your friends who you have to see every day that you\'re voting for Clinton, so you don\'t have to deal with them giving you shit every day. But a person you\'ve never talked to before and will never talk to again calls you and asks who you\'re planning on voting for, and you still think "I better not tell them the truth or they\'ll laugh at me?" People are *that* ashamed of their vote?', '>>{missmegz1492} : Did you read the article? It showed plenty of examples of US presidents who claimed they were going to win due to a "secret vote" losing which is exactly what Trump is doing now. Are there some people out there who won\'t admit they are going to vote for Trump? Sure, are there enough to sway the election? History says no.', ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > It isn’t: The two stories are vastly different. No offense to HuffPo, but what 'two stories'? I only see one, which is about the data from 2015. Still doesn't address this part of what Wikileaks tweeted (in bold): > Data is from govt & **not leaked by us**. They claim that they didn't leak it. I don't see where HuffPo addressed that claim.", '>>{drucifer27} : Here\'s the story from 2015, which WikiLeaks themselves shared in a tweet defending this latest leak: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/06/25/booze-runs-pork-smuggling-and-fixation-on-shiites-more-revelations-from-saudi.html Nothing in there related to this new set of charges, apart from the fact that they both deal with the Saudis. WikiLeaks is trying to claim that the leaking of gay Saudis\' personal info was part of an older leak and that they\'re recycling it, which doesn\'t hold up under scrutiny. They\'re just trying to deflect from their recklessness by using the typical "something something Corporate Media!!!" excuse and claiming to be the real victims. Pathetic.', ">>{Richafod} : The story's not real the media decided yesterday to go all out and try discredit Wikileaks before another leak happens. None of what they are saying is new information nor has any negative impact ever happened to an innocent person involved.", '>>{h3rring} : Every poll showed a very close race leading up to the election.', '>>{satosaison} : Dude makes official statement following preliminary investigation by NYPD/FDNY =\\= dude making bullshit pronouncement instantly without any facts.', ">>{BAHatesToFly} : So there was a recent second leak of Saudi info? I'm sorry, I still can't separate out how these are two different things.", '>>{drucifer27} : >None of what they are saying is new information nor has any negative impact ever happened to an innocent person involved. So because no negative outcomes have been reported yet that makes it fine for WikiLeaks to publish people\'s personal info, passport info, etc online without their consent? To publicly out people in Saudi Arabia without their consent? Sorry but "Oh, well nothing bad has happened yet!" is not a convincing defense for their reprehensible breaches of privacy and utterly reckless use of other people\'s information.', ">>{Argorash} : What if the American citizens he doesn't like are running a smear campaign against him?", ">>{TrippleTonyHawk} : a lot more know from the various outlets reporting on it than from wikileaks posting it, they have millions of docs they've leaked. And they said the data wasn't leaked by them. where was it featured prominently on their website?", '>>{missmegz1492} : His campaign manager tried to point out that he is at least doing "better" in the online polls and robo call polls. He is still losing in those polls. Forget not being able to tell a stranger who you are voting for... if you can\'t even tell a robot that you are going to vote for Trump I think you need to take a moment.', '>>{IDFSHILL} : Trump didn\'t outperform his polling in the primary. He doesn\'t have any "hidden voters."', '>>{Richafod} : Just go google it, the majority of what is being said never happened, the Saudi story is fake, and the rest is all recycled stories. The media has gone nuts with this the last 2 days but if this election has thought us anything its dont believe the first story you read. Im not saying they have a perfect track record what Im saying is the good they do far outweighs this manufactured bad.', '>>{TheMovingFinger} : >“They\'ve been members of this club for a long time," Trump said of the newlyweds. "They\'ve paid me a fortune.”', ">>{valenzetti} : C'mon Shinzo, let's go over and say hello is such an embarrassing quote.", '>>{xzerr} : The guy who attacked John McCain for his honorable service? A patriot? Interesting perspective.', '>>{champagon_2} : I just snapped a photo near Mar-a-Lago, you can see 2 spies in this one! http://i.imgur.com/IFmsjGu.gif', '>>{random4893} : Jesus Christ. I hoped you were kidding, but nope: >Entering the ornate room, Trump took a photo with the bride and her bridesmaids, who posed in red gowns next to the commander in chief, mimicking his signature thumbs-up. Then he grabbed a microphone. "I saw them out on the lawn today," Trump said of the bride and groom, who were standing nearby. "I said to the Prime Minister of Japan, I said, \'C\'mon Shinzo, let\'s go over and say hello.\' " "They\'ve been members of this club for a long time," Trump said of the newlyweds. "They\'ve paid me a fortune." He has no fucking idea how embarrassing he is. Can you imagine what Japanese officials think of America after going through this emergency situation with them? It makes me sick thinking about it.', ">>{2ndofthe3rd} : LOL like that's going to happen. we're the richest country with the highest standard of living for any country with as many people as we have, we consume so much that NO country or company is going to stop doing business with us.", '>>{IDFSHILL} : No they did not, this is a blatant fucking lie I see people repeat constantly. http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/06/britain-s-eu-referendum', '>>{other_suns} : > Wikileaks releases files as they come. Not anymore.', ">>{sanspri} : An explosive device planted in a public area is terrorism. you're the racist. why link muslim to this act of terrorism? I didn't.", '>>{TheMovingFinger} : If anyone’s keeping score, he must be close to Bush’s eight years of forehead-whackers already.', '>>{Ks_resistance} : > the decision-making on full view to fellow diners, who described it in detail to CNN.< SERIOUSLY?? Does every member of Mar-a-Lago have FBI clearance to HEAR WTF was being discussed? And Is everyone here aware that membership dues for new incoming members was DOUBLED this year to $200,000. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/.../donald-trump-administration.html Hillary was big on "Pay to play" nah, I think she\'s got a rival. He\'s not even being ashamed of it.', ">>{Ninel56} : Even if it would be much more profitable to do business somewhere else? The country's status won't mean much when the business will realise that such taxes are giving it larger expenses than in other countries.", '>>{2ndofthe3rd} : ........................... What has he done that\'s "put Russia before American citizens"? Said he doesn\'t think there\'s any point in continuing the degradation of relations with one of the other largest economies on earth? Yikes how concerning... The issue going on with Russia and the ukraine is much much more complicated and goes back way farther than the average american INCLUDING you THINK you know. If you think Russia "hackd duh elections" you\'re a super idiot. Just gotta cover all the bases ;)', '>>{Palmertabs} : Why? Thats his name... "C\'mon Ryan, let\'s go over and say hello." Does an American name make you feel more comfortable?', '>>{____yourcouch} : I have some anecdotal evidence to back that up. I got dinner with my mother a few weeks ago and mentioned how much I like Hillary. She\'s always voted republican, but always respected my more liberal beliefs. In a hushed tone she says "I don\'t think I can vote for Trump." I immediately, and not so cautiously, exclaimed "of course you can\'t, he\'s insane." I was just surprised by how cautiously she approached the subject. practically whispering as if voting Democrat was that bad.', '>>{iiig} : He in fact slightly *underperformed* his polls.', ">>{Quinnjester} : Quite the opposite. It's actually a lot of Clinton supporters under the radar. They are the ones that keep it a secret. Honestly if you haven't noticed how EVERYONE accuse one person defending Clinton they are easily called a shill a traitor and so on and so forth.", ">>{hydestreet} : Rapists aren't exactly known for being respectful of rape victims wishes", '>>{satosaison} : Kinda fucked up, but that is how they are using it. What intentional bomb targeting civilians is "not terrorism," unless we are using the words to mean Muslim terrorism?', ">>{DrunkShimoda} : >Every poll showed Brexit losing also. That would be a comforting factoid for worried Trump fans... if it were actually true. It isn't.", ">>{moxy801} : Could be some nut or some construction worker angry with their boss...there are lots of reasons other than 'terrorism' people do things like this.", ">>{gAlienLifeform} : Pretty sure they know that and they're just hoping that if they repeat a lie often enough it can become the conventional wisdom despite not being true.", ">>{pejmany} : Those are the ones who don't care, professionally or personally. There's others out there", ">>{Maple28} : it seems that Clinton supporters are putting effort into discrediting WikiLeaks. I wonder if it's a preemptive attack, designed to minimize incoming leaks about Clintion.", ">>{HelloFellowHumans} : We're all going to look like fools when the CHUDs emerge from their abyssal kingdom and vote overwhelmingly for Trump.", ">>{torode} : There is a big difference between saying they haven't found a link to terrorism and declaring that it isn't terrorism.", ">>{DumpinDrumpfsFace} : Please don't let it be a Muslim who did this. Trump's poll numbers will shoot through the roof. Please be a cis white male. PLEASE", '>>{HamsterSandwich} : > He doesn\'t have any "hidden voters." [Oh yes he does.](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JCwVgHxePnc/maxresdefault.jpg)', ">>{tiredofbuttons} : Exactly! When they are too cowardly to even admit in a confidential poll we have to assume they're too cowardly to admit it on the ballot too.", '>>{dfaraci} : I guess being the mayor or New York and being on the scene and waiting for information from the fire and police departments as wellas the FBI is what allows de Blasio to have more knowledge about the situation than Trump. Weird.', '>>{botchedrobbery} : The mayor may have a bit more information than Trump.', ">>{botchedrobbery} : That's irrelevant given that the mayor has more information and has made a public statement.", '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : 97 percent of terrorism is carried out by muslims. And also the peaceful of any extremist movement are irrelevent. The peaceful nazi didnt stop 12 million people from being slaughtered by nazi. The peaceful stalinists didnt stop 25 million people from being slaughtered by stalinists and the peaceful maoists didnt stop 80 million people from being slaughtered by maoists.', '>>{gaeuvyen} : Yeah who would have guessed the leader of a town an attack took place in would be part of the knowledge chain for what went down.', ">>{RIPGeorgeHarrison} : He's waiting for the information to come in instead of jumping the gun like a real politician should.", ">>{KikiFlowers} : Why would a *candidate* have more information than either the Mayor of the City, or the President? Just because you're running doesn't mean you get briefed on this shit.", '>>{Balsawoodmaster} : You know what they say about assumptions! Trump was briefed before speaking on the matter, yet the outrage was swift from the biased media and leftists who will now give a pass to the Democrat who spoke out of turn. https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/777323136744251393', '>>{YouShouldBeOut} : Trump was briefed on the facts before speaking - https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/777323136744251393 Just another leftist double standard. Only the Democrat is allowed to speak because obviously he is informed while the Republican knows nothing so say we all!', ">>{KikiFlowers} : It shouldn't be, but that's the only time anyone is called a terrorist by the media. Is if they're Muslim. The Charleston Church shooter? Not a terrorist because he was White. The Boston Bombers? Terrorists. In reality both of them should be labeled terrorists, but only one does.", ">>{winstonjpenobscot} : *Police Chiefs of New York City are calling me up, they're saying, Donald we can tell you all this information about the explosion in New York City, you wouldn't believe all this information, it's unbelievable, it's so information, we try to tell the Mayors of New York City but the Mayors are so awful they're just so bad I feel sorry for them, Donald, they're telling me all about this situations in New York Cities it's unbelievable, believe me*", ">>{satosaison} : Briefed on the investigation that hadn't yet happened? Did his sources consult a crystal ball?", '>>{ukraine_not_weak} : Fair to "assume" that the investigation advanced in the hours between when Trump was briefed and de Blasio\'s statement.', ">>{CDXXRoman} : Is this one of Trump's imaginary conversations like the NFL letter.", '>>{viccar0} : The statement was made with the police commissioner standing right behind him, though.', ">>{gaeuvyen} : When it was just some piece of shit who had no political agenda and didn't mean to strike fear into people to change the way they act and police themselves, but to just be a dick and kill or hurt people.", ">>{gaeuvyen} : What if it's a Trump supporter? What will the polls look like if that came out to be the case?", '>>{gaeuvyen} : It was a deliberate attack Well yes, obviously anyone will come to that conclusion I\'m pretty sure it wasn\'t someone accidentally setting of an explosion like that. "There was no evidence ***yet*** that it was an act of terrorism." >"We do not see a link to terrorism," the mayor said, adding that it would take "more hours” before details emerge.', ">>{epicvr} : Forgive my stupidly here but isn't an intentional explosion in a heavily populated area classed as terrorism regardless of motive or who did it? I live in Belfast and we had a habit of calling things like this terrorism but times must have changed.", '>>{GaryRuppert} : it sounds like the bombs are very similar to the Tsarnaev bombs from Boston. So, it was probably some angry Episcopalians or something totally not terrorism', '>>{satosaison} : Ah, the good ol days. When people blew people up for no reason, instead of for terrible reasons.', ">>{heartsfelled2} : > Forgive my stupidly here but isn't an intentional explosion in a heavily populated area classed as terrorism regardless of motive or who did it? No. It only needs a political motivation behind it. We still don't know the motivation here.", ">>{stokesitis} : No. Generally speaking terrorism is tied to a tenet or belief, political and religious, for example. De Blasio is being careful not to label it terrorism since the motive is unknown. Kind of the same reason that when a body is found it isn't immediately called a murder without investigation.", '>>{epicvr} : In Belfast and Ireland in general we called any intentional explosion in an area full of civilians terrorism. It was only ever when the target was military that the wording changed.', ">>{black_flag_4ever} : It's only changed in this subreddit if it helps a political point.", '>>{red-17} : He spoke less then an hour after the explosion. Do you honestly think there was conclusive evidence from an investigation that quickly? And even if there was, why would he know faster than the mayor of the city it happened in?', ">>{stokesitis} : Yeah coloquial usage can definitely alter our understanding and everyday definitions of words. And depending on when you lived in Ireland I can understand that behavior. I mean for the record I would be very surprised if it wasn't terrorism in this case, but I just thought I'd try and answer your question in as accurate terms as possible", '>>{Askew_2016} : A Muslim attacked eight people in a mall in St. Cloud MN tonight stabbing them and talking about Allah unfortunately. Trump supporters seem gleeful about it on Twitter.', '>>{heartsfelled2} : And I clarified using the definition. There is no disagreement.', '>>{TURBOSLUT420} : No, because half these people refuse to call it that if it helps Trump. They fear Trump more than bombs!', ">>{Obiwontaun} : Orrrrrr, it could just be people waiting for more information before making the assessment. It could totally turn out to be terrorism, but as of right now, we just don't know.", '>>{BasketOfDeplorable} : Depends on the skin color and religion. /s', ">>{dumbscrub} : we just don't know enough details to make an accurate assessment. just like how catatonic shillary was just overheated when she had to be thrown into a van and carted off for amphetamine shots and then take the rest of the week off for 'non contagious bacterial pneumonia' that doesn't even exist.", ">>{fe75f95aed185b273458} : So now he's being tRump-like by jumping to conclusions too."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{valenzetti} : At Mar-a-Lago, Trump tackles crisis diplomacy at close range', ">>{valenzetti} : > As Mar-a-Lago's wealthy members looked on from their tables, and with a keyboard player crooning in the background, Trump and Abe's evening meal quickly morphed into a strategy session, the decision-making on full view to fellow diners, who described it in detail to CNN. [...] > The patio was lit only with candles and moonlight, so aides used the camera lights on their phones to help the stone-faced Trump and Abe read through the documents. But her emails.", ">>{DickButtwoman} : Holy fuck, if I were a spy, I'd just set up somewhere with a camera. They didn't even use a tent?", ">>{golikehellmachine} : It's almost like all of the noise about Clinton's emails *wasn't* about government security policy.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : Oh, I'd be willing to bet there was a lot of that going on. Amongst other things, Trump's insistence on staying at Mar-A-Lago was a big fucking billboard that said SPIES WELCOME HERE.", '>>{MTL9} : That\'s cool. It\'s the "Winter White House" now. I\'m sure it\'s very secure... /s', '>>{TheMovingFinger} : >“They\'ve been members of this club for a long time," Trump said of the newlyweds. "They\'ve paid me a fortune.”', ">>{valenzetti} : C'mon Shinzo, let's go over and say hello is such an embarrassing quote.", '>>{champagon_2} : I just snapped a photo near Mar-a-Lago, you can see 2 spies in this one! http://i.imgur.com/IFmsjGu.gif', '>>{random4893} : Jesus Christ. I hoped you were kidding, but nope: >Entering the ornate room, Trump took a photo with the bride and her bridesmaids, who posed in red gowns next to the commander in chief, mimicking his signature thumbs-up. Then he grabbed a microphone. "I saw them out on the lawn today," Trump said of the bride and groom, who were standing nearby. "I said to the Prime Minister of Japan, I said, \'C\'mon Shinzo, let\'s go over and say hello.\' " "They\'ve been members of this club for a long time," Trump said of the newlyweds. "They\'ve paid me a fortune." He has no fucking idea how embarrassing he is. Can you imagine what Japanese officials think of America after going through this emergency situation with them? It makes me sick thinking about it.', '>>{TheMovingFinger} : If anyone’s keeping score, he must be close to Bush’s eight years of forehead-whackers already.', '>>{Ks_resistance} : > the decision-making on full view to fellow diners, who described it in detail to CNN.< SERIOUSLY?? Does every member of Mar-a-Lago have FBI clearance to HEAR WTF was being discussed? And Is everyone here aware that membership dues for new incoming members was DOUBLED this year to $200,000. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/.../donald-trump-administration.html Hillary was big on "Pay to play" nah, I think she\'s got a rival. He\'s not even being ashamed of it.', '>>{Palmertabs} : Why? Thats his name... "C\'mon Ryan, let\'s go over and say hello." Does an American name make you feel more comfortable?'], [">>{missmegz1492} : Donald Trump's 'Undercover' Supporters: A Short History of Candidates Saying 'Hidden' Voters Will Save Them.", '>>{missmegz1492} : > "Romney felt so good he didn’t even write a concession speech until that evening, when the writing was on the wall. Just as for McGovern, Mondale, and Dukakis, the crowd was a mirage, and Romney lost. A campaign adviser told CBS that running mate Paul Ryan was “genuinely shocked.” In his case, it turned out there had been a hidden vote—but it was for Obama. The Romney campaign underestimated the number of minority voters who would turn out.', '>>{roboboogienights} : >There are millions of people out there that are afraid to admit they’re going to vote for Donald Trump.” Why not? “They’re going to get bashed by their liberal friends!” This is hilarious. Like trump supporters are wallflowers who whisper only when spoken to and never share their opinions. The total opposite of the Trump supporters I know!', '>>{rwilso7} : Every poll showed Brexit losing also. That doesn\'t there is a " secret " Trump vote, but there sure could be.', '>>{missmegz1492} : I do think that there are voters out there who are embarrassed to admit they are going to vote for Trump, but enough to sway the election?? No.', ">>{Produceher} : As someone who has a Facebook account, I can say for sure that Trump supporters don't STFU", ">>{h3rring} : Can't the same be said for Clinton? Anecdotally, I know a bunch of religious white women who would never dare breathe a word about voting for Clinton to their husbands.", '>>{meowskywalker} : Ignoring the fact that if you\'re embarrassed to tell another human being who you\'re voting for, that seems like a pretty good sign you shouldn\'t be voting for them, is this a real issues in polling? I mean, it\'s one thing to tell your friends who you have to see every day that you\'re voting for Clinton, so you don\'t have to deal with them giving you shit every day. But a person you\'ve never talked to before and will never talk to again calls you and asks who you\'re planning on voting for, and you still think "I better not tell them the truth or they\'ll laugh at me?" People are *that* ashamed of their vote?', '>>{missmegz1492} : Did you read the article? It showed plenty of examples of US presidents who claimed they were going to win due to a "secret vote" losing which is exactly what Trump is doing now. Are there some people out there who won\'t admit they are going to vote for Trump? Sure, are there enough to sway the election? History says no.', '>>{h3rring} : Every poll showed a very close race leading up to the election.', '>>{missmegz1492} : His campaign manager tried to point out that he is at least doing "better" in the online polls and robo call polls. He is still losing in those polls. Forget not being able to tell a stranger who you are voting for... if you can\'t even tell a robot that you are going to vote for Trump I think you need to take a moment.', '>>{IDFSHILL} : Trump didn\'t outperform his polling in the primary. He doesn\'t have any "hidden voters."', '>>{IDFSHILL} : No they did not, this is a blatant fucking lie I see people repeat constantly. http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/06/britain-s-eu-referendum', '>>{____yourcouch} : I have some anecdotal evidence to back that up. I got dinner with my mother a few weeks ago and mentioned how much I like Hillary. She\'s always voted republican, but always respected my more liberal beliefs. In a hushed tone she says "I don\'t think I can vote for Trump." I immediately, and not so cautiously, exclaimed "of course you can\'t, he\'s insane." I was just surprised by how cautiously she approached the subject. practically whispering as if voting Democrat was that bad.', '>>{iiig} : He in fact slightly *underperformed* his polls.', ">>{Quinnjester} : Quite the opposite. It's actually a lot of Clinton supporters under the radar. They are the ones that keep it a secret. Honestly if you haven't noticed how EVERYONE accuse one person defending Clinton they are easily called a shill a traitor and so on and so forth.", ">>{DrunkShimoda} : >Every poll showed Brexit losing also. That would be a comforting factoid for worried Trump fans... if it were actually true. It isn't.", ">>{gAlienLifeform} : Pretty sure they know that and they're just hoping that if they repeat a lie often enough it can become the conventional wisdom despite not being true.", ">>{pejmany} : Those are the ones who don't care, professionally or personally. There's others out there", ">>{HelloFellowHumans} : We're all going to look like fools when the CHUDs emerge from their abyssal kingdom and vote overwhelmingly for Trump.", '>>{HamsterSandwich} : > He doesn\'t have any "hidden voters." [Oh yes he does.](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JCwVgHxePnc/maxresdefault.jpg)', ">>{tiredofbuttons} : Exactly! When they are too cowardly to even admit in a confidential poll we have to assume they're too cowardly to admit it on the ballot too."], ['>>{lambu_ata} : Trump: Toyota Faces Big Tax if it Builds Corolla Cars for U.S. in Mexico', ">>{lambu_ata} : Trump is a true American patriot. I'm sure he will be a great President", '>>{The_cuckmaker} : >"Toyota President Akio Toyoda said in Japan on Thursday that the automaker has no immediate plans to curb production in Mexico, preferring to wait until after Trump\'s Jan. 20 inauguration before deciding whether to make any changes." Translation: fuck you', ">>{d_c_d_} : I have an undying love for baseball, but I don't think I'd do very well in the majors.", '>>{Ninel56} : The funny thing is, such actions will only discourage businesses from further deals with the US.', ">>{frackpot} : you must have a different definition of patriot than I do, or you don't know trump's history.", '>>{bbiggs32} : Yes he is. He\'s going to put "the USA in recession again."', '>>{pseudolocus} : Yep, my twenty year old Corolla has only needed minor maintenance and repair of stuff like hoses and corroded battery parts. And its driven cross country multiple times. Also it was made in Canada...', ">>{Argorash} : What if the American citizens he doesn't like are running a smear campaign against him?", '>>{xzerr} : The guy who attacked John McCain for his honorable service? A patriot? Interesting perspective.', ">>{2ndofthe3rd} : LOL like that's going to happen. we're the richest country with the highest standard of living for any country with as many people as we have, we consume so much that NO country or company is going to stop doing business with us.", ">>{Ninel56} : Even if it would be much more profitable to do business somewhere else? The country's status won't mean much when the business will realise that such taxes are giving it larger expenses than in other countries.", '>>{2ndofthe3rd} : ........................... What has he done that\'s "put Russia before American citizens"? Said he doesn\'t think there\'s any point in continuing the degradation of relations with one of the other largest economies on earth? Yikes how concerning... The issue going on with Russia and the ukraine is much much more complicated and goes back way farther than the average american INCLUDING you THINK you know. If you think Russia "hackd duh elections" you\'re a super idiot. Just gotta cover all the bases ;)'], ['>>{drucifer27} : WikiLeaks Doesn’t Care It’s Naming Teenage Rape Victims And Outing People', ">>{Ratermelon} : Wikileaks releases files as they come. I don't see why anyone is surprised. I would prefer that they try to protect the little guy, but that's not how they operate. Edit: Wikileaks has released some redacted information in the past when working with other media organizations.", '>>{drucifer27} : From WikiLeaks? Yeah, they need to own up to their bullshit.', '>>{TrippleTonyHawk} : what\'s huffpost\'s response to these two tweets from wikileaks? >No, WikiLeaks did not disclose "gays" to the Saudi govt. Data is from govt & not leaked by us. Story from 2015. Re-run now due to election. [(1)](https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/768134865049030656) - >.@WikiLeaks didn\'t upload the #AKP files with the private info on Turkish women - I did (and they\'ve been removed) >-Michael Best [(2)](https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/768080541547696128)', '>>{drucifer27} : If you\'d read the article you\'d know: >(Regarding the claim of “recycled” material, WikiLeaks stated in a second tweet the story is a re-run of a narrative from 2015, surfacing now because of the U.S. presidential election. It isn’t: The two stories are vastly different.) And that quote in the article has a link to the story that is supposedly being "re-run".', ">>{SortaVeg} : 1) Now the public knows and they and their families face severe backlash from the general population if the government hasn't already done so. 2) Wikileaks featured them prominently on their website and that's not who the Internet works (simply removing them).", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : > It isn’t: The two stories are vastly different. No offense to HuffPo, but what 'two stories'? I only see one, which is about the data from 2015. Still doesn't address this part of what Wikileaks tweeted (in bold): > Data is from govt & **not leaked by us**. They claim that they didn't leak it. I don't see where HuffPo addressed that claim.", '>>{drucifer27} : Here\'s the story from 2015, which WikiLeaks themselves shared in a tweet defending this latest leak: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/06/25/booze-runs-pork-smuggling-and-fixation-on-shiites-more-revelations-from-saudi.html Nothing in there related to this new set of charges, apart from the fact that they both deal with the Saudis. WikiLeaks is trying to claim that the leaking of gay Saudis\' personal info was part of an older leak and that they\'re recycling it, which doesn\'t hold up under scrutiny. They\'re just trying to deflect from their recklessness by using the typical "something something Corporate Media!!!" excuse and claiming to be the real victims. Pathetic.', ">>{Richafod} : The story's not real the media decided yesterday to go all out and try discredit Wikileaks before another leak happens. None of what they are saying is new information nor has any negative impact ever happened to an innocent person involved.", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : So there was a recent second leak of Saudi info? I'm sorry, I still can't separate out how these are two different things.", '>>{drucifer27} : >None of what they are saying is new information nor has any negative impact ever happened to an innocent person involved. So because no negative outcomes have been reported yet that makes it fine for WikiLeaks to publish people\'s personal info, passport info, etc online without their consent? To publicly out people in Saudi Arabia without their consent? Sorry but "Oh, well nothing bad has happened yet!" is not a convincing defense for their reprehensible breaches of privacy and utterly reckless use of other people\'s information.', ">>{TrippleTonyHawk} : a lot more know from the various outlets reporting on it than from wikileaks posting it, they have millions of docs they've leaked. And they said the data wasn't leaked by them. where was it featured prominently on their website?", '>>{Richafod} : Just go google it, the majority of what is being said never happened, the Saudi story is fake, and the rest is all recycled stories. The media has gone nuts with this the last 2 days but if this election has thought us anything its dont believe the first story you read. Im not saying they have a perfect track record what Im saying is the good they do far outweighs this manufactured bad.', '>>{other_suns} : > Wikileaks releases files as they come. Not anymore.', ">>{hydestreet} : Rapists aren't exactly known for being respectful of rape victims wishes", ">>{Maple28} : it seems that Clinton supporters are putting effort into discrediting WikiLeaks. I wonder if it's a preemptive attack, designed to minimize incoming leaks about Clintion."], [">>{ManiaforBeatles} : De Blasio says Chelsea explosion was an 'intentional act'", ">>{YouShouldBeOut} : But the police are still investigating, where's the outrage at this Democrat for speaking out of turn without all the facts? Oh, right, manufactured outrage is only a thing if Trump says something about it.", '>>{gamechanger55} : Do you have a thing for terrorism so you can go bash American muslims for another month?', ">>{loki8481} : as the Mayor of NYC, it seems safe to assume that de Blasio is working directly with the officials on the scene and has information available that Trump in the middle of a rally doesn't.", '>>{satosaison} : Dude makes official statement following preliminary investigation by NYPD/FDNY =\\= dude making bullshit pronouncement instantly without any facts.', ">>{sanspri} : An explosive device planted in a public area is terrorism. you're the racist. why link muslim to this act of terrorism? I didn't.", '>>{satosaison} : Kinda fucked up, but that is how they are using it. What intentional bomb targeting civilians is "not terrorism," unless we are using the words to mean Muslim terrorism?', ">>{moxy801} : Could be some nut or some construction worker angry with their boss...there are lots of reasons other than 'terrorism' people do things like this.", ">>{torode} : There is a big difference between saying they haven't found a link to terrorism and declaring that it isn't terrorism.", ">>{DumpinDrumpfsFace} : Please don't let it be a Muslim who did this. Trump's poll numbers will shoot through the roof. Please be a cis white male. PLEASE", '>>{dfaraci} : I guess being the mayor or New York and being on the scene and waiting for information from the fire and police departments as wellas the FBI is what allows de Blasio to have more knowledge about the situation than Trump. Weird.', '>>{botchedrobbery} : The mayor may have a bit more information than Trump.', ">>{botchedrobbery} : That's irrelevant given that the mayor has more information and has made a public statement.", '>>{kanye_likes_rent_boy} : 97 percent of terrorism is carried out by muslims. And also the peaceful of any extremist movement are irrelevent. The peaceful nazi didnt stop 12 million people from being slaughtered by nazi. The peaceful stalinists didnt stop 25 million people from being slaughtered by stalinists and the peaceful maoists didnt stop 80 million people from being slaughtered by maoists.', '>>{gaeuvyen} : Yeah who would have guessed the leader of a town an attack took place in would be part of the knowledge chain for what went down.', ">>{RIPGeorgeHarrison} : He's waiting for the information to come in instead of jumping the gun like a real politician should.", ">>{KikiFlowers} : Why would a *candidate* have more information than either the Mayor of the City, or the President? Just because you're running doesn't mean you get briefed on this shit.", '>>{Balsawoodmaster} : You know what they say about assumptions! Trump was briefed before speaking on the matter, yet the outrage was swift from the biased media and leftists who will now give a pass to the Democrat who spoke out of turn. https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/777323136744251393', '>>{YouShouldBeOut} : Trump was briefed on the facts before speaking - https://twitter.com/alivitali/status/777323136744251393 Just another leftist double standard. Only the Democrat is allowed to speak because obviously he is informed while the Republican knows nothing so say we all!', ">>{KikiFlowers} : It shouldn't be, but that's the only time anyone is called a terrorist by the media. Is if they're Muslim. The Charleston Church shooter? Not a terrorist because he was White. The Boston Bombers? Terrorists. In reality both of them should be labeled terrorists, but only one does.", ">>{winstonjpenobscot} : *Police Chiefs of New York City are calling me up, they're saying, Donald we can tell you all this information about the explosion in New York City, you wouldn't believe all this information, it's unbelievable, it's so information, we try to tell the Mayors of New York City but the Mayors are so awful they're just so bad I feel sorry for them, Donald, they're telling me all about this situations in New York Cities it's unbelievable, believe me*", ">>{satosaison} : Briefed on the investigation that hadn't yet happened? Did his sources consult a crystal ball?", '>>{ukraine_not_weak} : Fair to "assume" that the investigation advanced in the hours between when Trump was briefed and de Blasio\'s statement.', ">>{CDXXRoman} : Is this one of Trump's imaginary conversations like the NFL letter.", '>>{viccar0} : The statement was made with the police commissioner standing right behind him, though.', ">>{gaeuvyen} : When it was just some piece of shit who had no political agenda and didn't mean to strike fear into people to change the way they act and police themselves, but to just be a dick and kill or hurt people.", ">>{gaeuvyen} : What if it's a Trump supporter? What will the polls look like if that came out to be the case?", '>>{gaeuvyen} : It was a deliberate attack Well yes, obviously anyone will come to that conclusion I\'m pretty sure it wasn\'t someone accidentally setting of an explosion like that. "There was no evidence ***yet*** that it was an act of terrorism." >"We do not see a link to terrorism," the mayor said, adding that it would take "more hours” before details emerge.', ">>{epicvr} : Forgive my stupidly here but isn't an intentional explosion in a heavily populated area classed as terrorism regardless of motive or who did it? I live in Belfast and we had a habit of calling things like this terrorism but times must have changed.", '>>{GaryRuppert} : it sounds like the bombs are very similar to the Tsarnaev bombs from Boston. So, it was probably some angry Episcopalians or something totally not terrorism', '>>{satosaison} : Ah, the good ol days. When people blew people up for no reason, instead of for terrible reasons.', ">>{heartsfelled2} : > Forgive my stupidly here but isn't an intentional explosion in a heavily populated area classed as terrorism regardless of motive or who did it? No. It only needs a political motivation behind it. We still don't know the motivation here.", ">>{stokesitis} : No. Generally speaking terrorism is tied to a tenet or belief, political and religious, for example. De Blasio is being careful not to label it terrorism since the motive is unknown. Kind of the same reason that when a body is found it isn't immediately called a murder without investigation.", '>>{epicvr} : In Belfast and Ireland in general we called any intentional explosion in an area full of civilians terrorism. It was only ever when the target was military that the wording changed.', ">>{black_flag_4ever} : It's only changed in this subreddit if it helps a political point.", '>>{red-17} : He spoke less then an hour after the explosion. Do you honestly think there was conclusive evidence from an investigation that quickly? And even if there was, why would he know faster than the mayor of the city it happened in?', ">>{stokesitis} : Yeah coloquial usage can definitely alter our understanding and everyday definitions of words. And depending on when you lived in Ireland I can understand that behavior. I mean for the record I would be very surprised if it wasn't terrorism in this case, but I just thought I'd try and answer your question in as accurate terms as possible", '>>{Askew_2016} : A Muslim attacked eight people in a mall in St. Cloud MN tonight stabbing them and talking about Allah unfortunately. Trump supporters seem gleeful about it on Twitter.', '>>{heartsfelled2} : And I clarified using the definition. There is no disagreement.', '>>{TURBOSLUT420} : No, because half these people refuse to call it that if it helps Trump. They fear Trump more than bombs!', ">>{Obiwontaun} : Orrrrrr, it could just be people waiting for more information before making the assessment. It could totally turn out to be terrorism, but as of right now, we just don't know.", '>>{BasketOfDeplorable} : Depends on the skin color and religion. /s', ">>{dumbscrub} : we just don't know enough details to make an accurate assessment. just like how catatonic shillary was just overheated when she had to be thrown into a van and carted off for amphetamine shots and then take the rest of the week off for 'non contagious bacterial pneumonia' that doesn't even exist.", ">>{fe75f95aed185b273458} : So now he's being tRump-like by jumping to conclusions too."]]

classify and reply

['>>{Craig-HD} : A Sanders surge in California? Hillary Clinton loses ground in stronghold', '>>{JZcgQR2N} : Lol he realizes he\'s losing badly at the last minute, so out of desperation he tries to court Bay area natives by attending a Warriors game, panders the LGBJ community showing up at a gay bar, and tries to appeal to Latinos by crashing a Spanish festival where he promptly gets kicked out for not planning it well enough, all under the guise of, according to his supporters, "just trying to have fun". Not to mention despite the fact he out raised Hillary in donations, his campaign failed to open more voting stations in Puerto Rico. Meanwhile his supporters, some of the biggest hypocritical and most condescending assholes ever, continue to attack Clinton and Trump for pandering (something Bernie should have done way before it was too late), violently riots against rally goers when they are unable get their opinions shoved down non-supporters\' throats, and continue to up-vote the same kind of pro-Bernie "news" every hour while silently mass down voting pro-Hillary or pro-Trump articles because they\'re "biased" or "unreliable". Bernie is a fucking loser who doesn\'t know how to appeal to the majority of Democrats and he and his delusional supporters think they know what the people wants better than they do themselves.', '>>{gladBats} : It\'s kind of crazy, how headlines are phrased. Like it\'s some epic fantasy battle between opposing armies instead of the everyday folks who are trying to live their lives and do what they think is right. It\'s all meant to divide people, make them less likely to cooperate and "join sides." It\'s not interesting enough (somehow) on its own, Americans have to glorify it. Crazy stuff.', '>>{theostrouble} : Right time to buy an iPhone SE or wait?', '>>{Usecod} : Well he tried to influence in for Hillary,but he failed.The next time Mark you should try harder.', '>>{oroyplata} : Anecdotally, all the Trumpisms and click bait leading up the election were definitely lopsided in Trump\'s favor. 4chan will claim victory in a "meme war" and I don\'t know that they\'re necessarily wrong.', '>>{garzie2016} : Word ‘Dozen’ Heard During Debate: Proof Hillary Clinton Wearing An Ear Piece?', ">>{ItchyIrishBalls} : Well ya, people are realizing Wall St Hillary and slick reality show, meme, nickname man are a joke and have no concrete plans. But the media and we're all going to die to Mexicans crowd are doing their best to fight it.", '>>{Cpt_Nosferatu} : Yeah a platform for sharing unsubstantiated fake news with a few hundred of your "friends", totally doesn\'t affect anything.', '>>{Fluffyfishbasket} : You sure spend a lot of time posting about how much you dislike him, hell, part of this post is copy and pasted from a post you made 40 mins prior lol.', ">>{majikmyk} : Say what you will about his campaign technique... But the issues he's running on are still better than the alternatives.", '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : Ready for the Clinton Establishment to whine about this post in 3....2....1....', '>>{IDFSHILL} : Want to know how republicans know they lost a debate? When they declare victory while at the same time spewing random conspiracy theories about how it was rigged.', ">>{US_Bennett} : I hope somebody is documenting all these desperate conspiracy theories, for posterity's sake.", '>>{kumu_bandara} : No rumors about a successor version for iPhone SE in 2017 maybe Apple release it in next year. I think iPhone SE is a good choice', ">>{Panda413} : tldr the_donald is the biggest safe space on reddit and they're all too oblivious to realize they are exactly what they claim to hate.", '>>{barbief} : If you want it now, go buy it. It has already dropped in price since its release. I bought one at the former price and soon after they lowered the price- I was not unhappy about that since even the original price was a great deal in my opinion.', '>>{garzie2016} : How about watching the video and then coming back and commenting?', '>>{CerseiClinton} : Eat a dick. Love trumps hate 2016...', '>>{Currency_Cat} : If you can wait until late 2017 onward, it seems as though Apple may be launching a new five-inch iPhone for those people who are not into the idea of holding a huge slab in their hands. If you do need to get a new phone now the SE is a great choice.', ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : It's got most of the hardware of the 6S so it's going to get software updates for the next three years at least. I wouldn't worry about what's around the corner when it's going to be a capable phone for years to come.", '>>{limited8} : > Now, you notice there is no teleprompter here tonight, which is probably smart, because maybe you saw Donald dismantle his prompter the other day. And I get that. They’re hard to keep up with, and I’m sure it’s even harder when you’re translating from the original Russian.', ">>{fortean} : The SE is an 6s with about half the pixels to move, missing only force touch. *IF* the size is fine to you it's an excellent purchase.", '>>{Cupinacup} : Oh hey, people are still citing the same poll that has Clinton up by 10% over Sanders with likely voters.', ">>{Assangeknows} : Why won't these nasty women let us defame them!!!!", ">>{OatmealFor3v3r} : They can't seem to accept another candidate can be more prepared and better overall.", ">>{gapost} : After coming from Android, I used the SE for a few months and really liked it. A few days ago, I started using a 6s. Yes, the innards are very similar, several things are different. The touch screen seems better on the 6s. Often, the SE didn't register touches. Also, for whatever reason, the 6s seems just slightly faster. For me, the SE was just a little small and hard to read in some instances. Otherwise, the differences are the 3D touch (nice, but not essential), better front-facing camera (not a big deal to me), and brighter screen outside. The SE battery is a little better and I loved it, but the 6s gets me through a whole day with plenty to spare. Oh, and the fingerprint sensor is upgraded on the 6s and noticeably faster.", '>>{winstonjpenobscot} : [Original post from which this was copied: https://m.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4mqymz/sanders_movement_will_go_on_as_peoples_summit_is/d3xqbcu)]', ">>{SoTiredOfWinning} : She won the last two contests with 60%, she will win NJ just as big. He has no momentum or money going into california. The polls do not paint a rosy picture for him either. Even in this very poll she's up 10%.", ">>{CerseiClinton} : Oh for Christ sake I don't support Trump. Try being civil.", '>>{lukee910} : The 7 is 4.7", the 7 plus is 5.5". A 5" phone would nor be comparable to the 4" SE.', '>>{Jackson_Cook} : I love my SE, just got it last week', '>>{tkarocker} : I am in the exact same boat as you right now. I have a 16gb 6 and wanting to buy a 64gb SE. Would you buy a new or used SE?', '>>{FlyingSquid} : Anything but acknowledge a *woman* could be smart and confident and prepared...', '>>{Ten_Thirty_Three} : Next year is the 10th anniversary. Just wait, see what they got in stock.', ">>{SoTiredOfWinning} : [NPR reporter: Sanders gets kicked out of Spanish event](https://i.sli.mg/GWMnOR.png) video https://www.instagram.com/p/BGSjQHfIr5a/ It's getting sad now.", ">>{SReject} : don't forget the top secret, super-duper, quantum electrostatic precision-directional ultra-sonar audio transmitter that beams what to say directly into Hillary's head! (do I really need the /s?)", ">>{Currency_Cat} : So you're saying that the possible five-inch is not simply a smaller version of the larger phones, you're saying the specs of such a phone will be rubbish? If so, that's a shame. I currently have a 5S and I haven't gone for an SE as I'm waiting to see if Apple bring out a more modern small phone.", ">>{AttackSkunk} : I don't believe it. That's why my Chrismas gifts to my relatives and in-laws that passed around ridiculous Facebook memes as truth will be donations made in their names to the Democratic party.", ">>{RIPrince} : Why would anyone whine about it? It doesn't matter if Sanders wins California unless its 80-20%.", '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : Why would the already nominee continue to lose states? I thought it was settled? Hmnm....', '>>{JDeppel} : > missing only force touch And 2nd gen TouchID.', '>>{Morchaint} : I love the narrative that there is a secret global conspiracy to rule the world, but that it can be exposed by people capturing videos of what they see on TV.', '>>{RedDorf} : Bush wore a mic! "Clinton wore an ear piece!" At this point, I\'m glad the candidates aren\'t wearing drool bibs.', ">>{golikehellmachine} : Facebook to advertisers: We definitely influence buying and consumer behavior. Facebook to public: We can't possibly influence voter behavior.", ">>{oroyplata} : It's almost as easy to get banned on /r/the_donald as it is on /r/politics.", ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : *(reads headline)* There it is, the dumbest fucking thing I'll see all day... *(slams beer)*", '>>{Assangeknows} : Saying eat a dick to yet another conspiracy theory from a racist is all the nicety I can muster', ">>{Jkoy} : There isn't enough delegates for Bernie so, a more liberal state siding with him ain't no biggie", ">>{golikehellmachine} : It's not just 4chan; there were plenty of Macedonian clickbait sites that made a pile of money during this election.", ">>{SReject} : The only true way to know they are winning is if they are concentrating on suppressing some minority's vote", '>>{PrzzTrump} : His influence, if any, will pale in comparison to the articles liberals and democrats are constantly positing on here in order to circle jerk themselves into a bigger rage. They are doing this to justify more riots and assaults.', ">>{EtriganZ} : So desperate for pro-Sanders news that y'all are resorting to an Indian news outlet?", '>>{gunt_master} : Let me clear this part up first of all: California was never a "stronghold" for Clinton.', ">>{RIPrince} : She probably won't lose California, but it doesn't really matter. Hillary has a larger lead over Sanders than Obama had over Clinton in 2008. Everyone in the world didn't really think it was a problem that Obama was considered the presumptive winner over a month before voting ended. You love your Bernie. That's cool, I like him too. But he isn't winning, so why are you being strange about this? P.S. After Obama pretty much clinched it in late April, Obama then went on to lose Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, Puerto Rico and South Dakota to Clinton. That didn't change anything then, and if Sanders wins California on Tuesday it isn't changing anything now.", ">>{kornian} : Obama didn't have an impending FBI indictment hanging over him.", '>>{GroriousNipponSteer} : >A more liberal state Yeah, California with nearly 60 million residents and an economy numbering ~$3T is nothing but another "more liberal state".', ">>{fier9224} : Possible impending FBI indictment. She's the only presidential candidate that could be found to be a criminal by the federal government.", ">>{RIPrince} : Not true actually, Trump may have a RICO case coming down with Trump U. Possible is different than impending. Considering that the email situation is very complicated and is unknown legal territory (first case of it's kind if it goes to trial) it seems unlikely to me to proceed unless the FBI and DOJ feel they have an airtight case.", '>>{kybbwork} : 5" is bigger than the iphone 6, 6S and 7.', ">>{Astreix_} : How good is 2nd gen. It's basically instantaneous. I never used TouchID on my 6, it was slow and always needed to be deleted and set up again. I've had my 7+ since Oct and it hasn't failed yet. Amazing. Though I did buy an 2nd hand iPad Air 2 on Boxing Day and the TouchID on that is good, pretty fast too.", ">>{DeltaEchoXray} : It's not Facebook's fault that a good portion of the country is improperly educated and knows nothing about fact-checking or verifying sources...or that most people don't even read beyond a headline.", '>>{wytxcook} : Instagram had Hillarious memes. Lots of crossover on the various platforms, but the best stuff favored Trump.', ">>{RIPrince} : Not really. There's nothing impending about an indictment to Clinton. Possible? Yeah. Probably? No. Impending? Lol.", '>>{Buttocks} : Why do people keep insisting that fake news only helped Trump?', ">>{fier9224} : Ok, so she's the only democratic candidate to ever have an investigation pending. Point still stands.", '>>{growyurown} : You are correct. Nothing imminent. The clinton foundation most likely already made some strategic business investments to ensure she wont be.', ">>{RIPrince} : > How dumb are you? that's a civil suit. Pretty dumb I guess: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/donald-trump-gonzalo-curiel/485636/ >Cohen, on the other hand, **targets Trump through a provision of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act**, more commonly known as the RICO Act—the same statute federal prosecutors use to bring down mob bosses. In essence, Low accuses Trump University of engaging in fraudulent business practices, while Cohen frames Trump University itself as a criminal enterprise with Trump as the orchestrator of a racketeering scheme. As you can imagine, Trump strongly opposes that characterization. In a motion for summary judgment in Cohen filed in March, he condemned the “pervasive abuse of civil RICO” that he says the case represents. “Indeed, if this case is allowed to proceed, it would represent an unprecedented and unprincipled expansion of civil RICO and transform virtually every alleged violation of consumer protection laws into a civil RICO claim,” Trump argued. There's a civil suit, and a RICO case being prepared. If they prove the RICO case, then criminal charges become far more likely.", ">>{Panda413} : If you're being serious, your inability to accurately observe reality is sad. I can say Hillary is the devil. I can say Obama is a Muslim and founded ISIS. I can say Trump is a good person and has an IQ higher than a 4th grader. All would be lies, none would get me banned from r/politics.", ">>{Another-Chance} : Who is stupid enough to believe that shit? Oh yeah. Conservatives. They also believe in a magic sky fairy who cures cancer if you say amen and then like a post. If Hillary wins I will make a ton of money off those dumbasses with website/book that just makes up bullshit (like the op's 'article').", ">>{Currency_Cat} : Is it? Oh shit. What a bell end. I'd better get an SE then while they're still around.", '>>{FredFredrickson} : Why is it totally impossible for these people to believe that she is just a smart person who can think on her toes?', ">>{RIPrince} : What point? She's also winning the nomination. FBI investigations don't lead to delegates being docked.", ">>{Panda413} : It's important to note that it is a FORCED echo chamber. Meaning if you share an opinion that goes against the echo chamber, your comment will be deleted and you will be banned from posting content. The echo chamber we see on subreddits like r/politics and r/protectandserve are very different, and much less embarrassing. Users downvote content they don't like and upvote content they agree with, but moderators of these subs are not silencing opposing views that are stated within the guidelines of the subreddit.", '>>{RIPrince} : Follow the money maaaaaan, Hillary is the devil no matter what maaaaan. Bush did 9/11.', ">>{roboboogienights} : plain as the nose on your face... to say it didn't is simply to lie, either to the world or yourself. and he probably knows it, he's just trying to save his skin.", '>>{HaiKarate} : We are at least 9 months away from the next iPhone launch. Yes, this is a good time to buy. The increased memory, alone, will dramatically change how you use the device.', ">>{CerseiClinton} : I just find it odd when people respond to things in much the same way we could expect Trump to respond when they're against his hate speech.", '>>{growyurown} : Yep. Keeping thinking she has your best interest in mind. Santa Claus is coming to your house along with the tooth fairy also. Where did I say anything about 9/11? Where did I say anything about conspiracy? Typical Hillary bot.', ">>{FredFredrickson} : It's be funny to see their origin date and rise/fall in popularity on a timeline, with political events (debates, leaks, etc.) corresponding to them.", ">>{RIPrince} : She doesn't give a shit about me. But she will enact policies I like, so it's good enough for me. I don't really care that she was dumb about her email server.", ">>{chewytheunicorn} : iPhone SE is a phenomenal choice if you're into the design factor of the iPhone 5 but want more oomph than that device can deliver. Go for it.", '>>{al0kz} : Had to chance to use a SE and a 6s concurrently for some time before the I got my 7 Plus. There was a very negligible difference in the TouchID unlock speed between both phones. I think the SE even now is a great purchase (preferred it to the 6s)', '>>{uncertain-ithink} : I never got the issue of having to delete and redo fingerprints with my iPhone 6. It worked pretty consistently, just slowly compared to iPhone 6s and newer. If my fingers were slightly wet or the sensor was dirty it would not work at all. My 7 is less picky but it still happens. Much much faster recognition on 7 as well.', '>>{pwomptastic} : This sub, a sub that was dominated with astroturfers posting an article from the huffington post, a newspaper run by Ariana Huffington who offered to work for one of the campaigns, posts an article about facebook, another social media site where fake news abounded denying any influence in election. My brain...', ">>{Elryc35} : You hope it's the dumbest thing you'll hear all day, but it's still way too early to call off that race.", '>>{Assangeknows} : No see, I said eat a dick to a lie. Not eat a dick to the DNI and CIA. Both sides are not equal', '>>{sedgwickian} : Another tech billionaire proving he knows a lot about coding and little about anything else. If we survive trump, the next threat will be these guys thinking they should run for office (looking at you, Mark Cuban)', '>>{diceruler} : The former price dropped only for the 64 GB model', '>>{fier9224} : An investigation could cause superdelegates to lose confidence and switch their vote.', '>>{_Will_iam} : I would wait. You have a current phone that works.', '>>{Tewks44} : The video has the earmarks of a fake. First of all it claims she\'s using an earpiece. However the evidence is someone whispering "dozens" being picked up on audio. How does Hilary wearing an earpiece account for this? I struggle to draw the connection between an ear piece and Hillary\'s mic picking up someone\'s whispers. If you\'re suggesting her earpiece audio was picked up by the mic, why would they be whispering? Why would that be the only thing it picked up? Secondly, why is the "proof" a recording OF a YouTube video. This is something that would be very easy to fake. It wouldn\'t even require any post processing. How do we know the person filming isn\'t just simply whispering "dozen" at a brief pause in Clinton\'s remarks? Personally I\'ve given this video a far more reasoned response than it deserves. To put it bluntly, it is laughable. EDIT: I looked into it some more and it appears the audio isn\'t being fabricated. However there\'s a far more simple explanation. Trump smacked his lips and HIS mic picked it up. Rewatch and pay close attention to Trump\'s mouth. As an aside I feel ridiculous for even indulging in this. This is the last time I try to entertain a conspiracy theorist.', '>>{golikehellmachine} : Facebook actually did a study to try to implement fact-checking in their Top Stories. They decided not to implement it when it turned out that pro-Trump/anti-Clinton stories were *overwhelmingly* the majority of the stories that would be flagged.', ">>{RIPrince} : All the SD's are aware of the investigation. Exactly 0 have switched their vote due to it.", ">>{oroyplata} : > If you're being serious, your inability to accurately observe reality is sad. Sad, huh. Appreciate the compassion. Ever call someone a shill or even hint at it on this sub? WHAM! Ban hammer, bro. They swing it pretty liberally too. So, yeah, you can go to /r/the_donald and call God Emperor Trump an orange fucking muppet and get banned ... Out here, speak your mind and call out blatant shilling, however politely, and get the same result.", ">>{EngineerinLA} : My wife has the SE and loves it. If you want the smaller phone but not sacrifice speed (same chip as the 6S) I'd get the SE.", ">>{leftbutnotthatfar} : It's harder to sell to people who know they are being sold to. Wtf do you expect him to say lol. I love it though, make em dance", ">>{fier9224} : Honestly I don't expect many to switch. But maybe, just maybe the Democrats realize the national shame resulting from supporting a presidential candidate that may or may not be a criminal.", '>>{Rubikh} : And premium build, and 1.2 mpx 2012 model selfie camera same as on my iphone 5, and no OiS on main camera', '>>{Rubikh} : They most likely are not going to release a new "small" model this year and noone can guarantee they will next year. Mainly because the spec difference is not at noticable thus the cycle of upgrade is not so often. Personally I would go for 5S rather than SE due to price difference between two', ">>{RIPrince} : Generally it's innocent until proven guilty. Apparently the people at the top don't consider the email thing an imminent threat. They aren't reading every single right-wing rag that says bad stuff about Clinton. Brietbart, the NY Post, Wash examiner, NRO, etc. 90% of the anti-Clinton stuff on this board is from that garbage, it tends to distort reality.", '>>{LittleShrub} : Yes, Hillary did great at the debate. It\'s called "preparing" conspiracy morons.', ">>{RIPrince} : Lovely Tuesday night isn't it. What a Bernie landslide in California.", ">>{Assangeknows} : I will. And I'll continue mocking little wishy washy contrarians like you", ">>{MS49SF} : That doesn't really help OP as they were looking at a phone with a 4 inch screen. They could already buy the iPhone 7 if they were looking at something in the 5 inch range (4.7in but close enough)", '>>{imonreddittoo} : If democracy in America has reached the point that people are deciding who to vote for based on a bunch of fucking frog memes, maybe it really is time to burn the whole damn thing to the ground and start over.', '>>{seanr9ne} : >No see, I said eat a dick to a lie Actual Post >Eat a dick conservative conspiracy theorists Rookay', '>>{tramplers6} : Yep.. I bet there are Sanders supporters in lot of older threads too..Go look them up and gloat if it makes you happy..', ">>{CerseiClinton} : Well aren't you just a lil' ray of sunshine.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : > Wtf do you expect him to say lol. Well, I *didn't* expect him to unintentionally say his entire business model is complete garbage, which is exactly what he's saying here.", ">>{Assangeknows} : They're lying, do you want me clarify further?", ">>{tecfrigo} : I bought the SE just before Christmas - coming from a 6+ I thought it was going to go badly with a smaller screen, but now I understand what the SE fuss is about. It's such a brilliant phone - best phone I've ever owned in fact, and I'm not a casual user, I use it all day for work and play. It's lightning fast for a start. The design is a massive improvement to the 6/7 which never felt comfortable in my hands (something I noticed even more after switching). The size, which I thought would be the biggest issue, is soooooo much better (for me at least, and I'm a large man) and one-handed use is absolutely brilliant for using the phone efficiently again. And the battery has been a real trooper, often lasting from one morning to the next evening! Never got that kind of mileage with the 6+. And it's so nice to hold to my ear as, you know, a phone. Like you, I was worried about picking up a phone that 'might' be near the end of its cycle and almost went for the 7 with no headphone jack (which I use all the time), force touch (don't care) and 2nd-gen TouchID (still don't care), but after a bit of thinking I realised the SE is almost half the price of the 7 (at least here in the UK) and it's got literally everything I want on my iPhone. And now I have it, I wish I had done it sooner and not stuck it out with the 6+, which now in comparison looks and feels like a fat old tramp. If they update it this year, so what? Sell your SE if it's worth upgrading and you won't be out much due to its already low price. If they don't upgrade it, you'll be glad you bought the SE. If you wait around wondering whether to get a current model or a potentially upgraded model months down the line, you could be waiting forever.", ">>{Panda413} : My apologies... > almost as easy You simply don't know what those words mean. Carry on.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : You could've stopped at TLDR. I mean, no need to state the obvious.", ">>{RIPrince} : I don't mind anyone being a Sanders supporter. I like Sanders.", '>>{cut2size} : Buy a phone with force touch. Once you start using it you expect it to be on everything.', '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : The state where the AP pulled a hitjob for Hillary?', ">>{RIPrince} : Oh yeah, that's the reason Bernie is losing, because of an AP article the night before the election. Are you really this deluded or do you just like lying to yourself? Do you think Bernie would have 200,000 more votes if not for that AP article? Lol man.", '>>{RIPrince} : Sorry I need to adjust my numbers now, Bernie is down by 420,000 votes with 90% reporting. So 420,000 people who were going to vote for Sanders, switched their vote for Clinton because of an AP article yesterday. Sounds legit.', ">>{stonebone4} : That's one of Trump's gross wet mouth sounds. His mouth literally moves [at the exact millisecond](https://youtu.be/Ffq9jfvVato?t=22) the sound is heard. Jesus people.", '>>{barbief} : I thought they both dropped. Regardless, OP indicated he wanted the 64GB anyhow. :)', ">>{PlasticPuller} : The 6S doesn't have optical image stabilisation, only the plus does.", ">>{woodtick57} : if you play it backwards, it quotes the entirety of Karl Marx's manifesto.", '>>{Assangeknows} : You\'re like that dude at the end of the 2nd debate. "Hillary, Donald has called for your execution, he says you have hate in your heart and that you should be in jail...what do you like about him" *smiles*', '>>{Rubikh} : considering it was released in 2016 and lacks OIS is a big minus.', '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : Are you ready deluded tough think that calling a primary on the eve of a big vote does not impact the integrity of the vote?', '>>{diceruler} : Even if he does get the 16 GB model its still a very great value!', '>>{RIPrince} : It made zero difference. Show evidence that it did.', ">>{seanr9ne} : You should clarify the last post, if that's the case. There is a difference between a liar and their lies. One is a tangible thing.", '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : You sounds like either a very naive person or a very dishonest one', ">>{theostrouble} : Have been out and didn't expect such a response - thank you all for your advice! Clearly I'm in the same boat as a few of you. The real factor here for me is price - getting 64gb seems like very good value to me, and I think I may actually like the idea of a smaller form factor and easier one handed use. But I'll soon find out as I have just ordered myself a shiny new space grey SE. Standby for a follow up regarding either a great decision or a regretful purchase...", ">>{theostrouble} : I was looking at a new one. Here in the UK I've just bought one for £429 which seemed like a good deal, as I'm not sure I can see myself dropping £700 odd for a 7 or 8 in the next couple of years.", '>>{reshp2} : Ear pieces, getting questions ahead of time... is it possible she actually just prepared well for the debate?', '>>{Assangeknows} : So your problem is with the lack of plurality of my word liar?', ">>{RIPrince} : It didn't have any affect on him winning or losing, so what's the difference?", ">>{seanr9ne} : No, the plural form of liar is liars. The plural form of lie is lies. Those are two completely different things. You didn't say liar, you said lie.", ">>{stonebone4} : Seriously. Live TV has a time delay of a few seconds so they can quickly cut away in case something crazy happens. If the Illuminati could be heard giving Hillary instructions I'm sure they would have taken care of that right???", ">>{Assangeknows} : Okay the fact that I've told lying liars to eat a dick for the lie they get old is where I'm ending this. If you're this lonely for contact call a bud", ">>{Hurrah_for_Karamazov} : SE is the best phone I've ever owned. It is exceptional.", ">>{levert1} : For me, personally, my Touch ID does not recognize my fingerprints sometimes. I've been switching from mostly TouchID to four digit passcode. Honestly, I am trying to bring myself to like the SE, but I just can't like it. I miss the larger screen, so I am going to return mine tomorrow and get the 7+. However, what everyone else is saying is perfectly valid and if you're willing to sacrifice some features then I say go for it.", ">>{seanr9ne} : Just reminding you that one statement is rather innocuous, the other is borderline sexual assault. If you're that lonely for sexual favors, call a prostitute.", ">>{topdude155} : I personally preferred the slower TouchID. With my iPhone 7, if I press the home button to turn my phone on, it's open immediately but sometimes I want to access the camera.", '>>{garzie2016} : I looked at that part for myself to see if it was real. I heard the dozens too.', '>>{Assangeknows} : My statement is sexual assault? Are you kidding?', ">>{km89} : I'm sorry, but am I understanding this correctly? Is this article claiming that Clinton had an earpiece that was *screaming* into her ear loud enough to be picked up by the microphone, but was also discrete enough that nobody from the Trump side saw it to raise a fuss about?", '>>{seanr9ne} : Demanding that an unwilling party fellate you can be construed as such. Demanding that a lie fellate you is not possible. Forgetting the Billy Bush tapes already, bro?', '>>{ThatsRRtoYou} : I went from a 6S to an SE and love it.', '>>{ThatsRRtoYou} : I went from a 6S to an SE and love it.', ">>{daybreaker} : > There it is, the dumbest fucking thing I'll see all day... > It's only 10am central. I seriously doubt this will be the dumbest thing you'll see from the Trumpsters today.", ">>{GPP1974} : Don't do it. A new iPhone will come out within the next 5 years and you don't want to be fucked over.", ">>{jnvdh06} : I came from a 6s 16gb to an SE 64gb. Love the extra space. Performance is the same if not slightly better. Love the screen size. Love the battery, between 6-8 hours usage time every day. Only real con is to front camera, only 1.2mp but I dont really take selfies so doesn't bother me. Dont miss force touch as I rarely used it. Also dont miss the fast finger print sensor as I like to view notifications before unlocking the phone. Price is also great. Great build quality.", ">>{gabrielquilez} : I bought the SE over a month ago because my 6 died, it's the best phone I've bought! I thought coming from the 6 would be a negative, but after a whole day of use I got used to the screen. It's seriously fast and smooth with that A9 Chip, even faster than the 7! The 12MP camera is phenomenal and battery life is WAY better than the 6, for me. If size isn't a problem, you should buy it!", '>>{garzie2016} : Blog? I find it funny how you assume this is my "blog" and not just me posting something I found off the internet. I also find it funny that you call a news article a blog. lol', '>>{MC_Fap_Commander} : Politicians do that shit for a living. They\'re good at. They don\'t need any help. If a person is dim and says "how\'d she do so good in that there debate thing?" I\'m sorry for you. There are MANY Republicans who could everything Hillary did (maybe even better than she did). You picked a terrible candidate. Stop embarrassing yourself.', ">>{tehSlothman} : So what you're saying is Trump's the one feeding her the lines???????", ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : I said this the last time around when the ear piece nonsense came up. Give this a try just for kicks. Have someone call you on the phone, and repeat back what they're saying without making it extremely obvious that's what you're doing. It is extremely difficult to parrot what someone is saying in real time with no mistakes, and to make it sound like your natural cadence.", '>>{scram_jones} : Where?! That dude owes me six bucks.', ">>{wavescrashover} : Christ... They've claimed ear piece and every debate so far and each time it's proven she didn't wear one.", '>>{bpadair31} : Because for most of them it is simply not possible that a woman can do something better than a man.', ">>{deflagration83} : This is ludicrous. You know what you don't hear on their microphones? Breathing. You know why? Because those microphones cannot pick up sounds that subtle. In order for the word to have been loud enough to be picked up on the microphone if it were coming from an inner earpiece it also would have been loud enough to blow her ear drum. No. Just no.", ">>{ballerina12-24} : Stonebone4 is coming too close to the truth, we will need to add him to the 'Clinton Death List' before he exposes us even more!", ">>{garzie2016} : Not my article, but your blinded by your hate so it's understandable.", ">>{MC_Fap_Commander} : Sorry, I couldn't read your comment. The hate blindness makes it impossible for me to see. I'll pick up some Hillary Parkinson's glasses later and see if they help.", ">>{Ow_wow} : Sorry, you won't get a discussion when you post an article that is 100% foolishness.", ">>{Ow_wow} : The day is young, and Rudy Giuliani will be speaking *somewhere*, so you're sure to be right.", '>>{garzie2016} : 100%? SOMETHING could be heard regardless. Your just dismissing it because you favor Hillary more than Trump.', '>>{garzie2016} : Sounds good. I hope your insurance covers it, I know they can be really expensive.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{theostrouble} : Right time to buy an iPhone SE or wait?', '>>{kumu_bandara} : No rumors about a successor version for iPhone SE in 2017 maybe Apple release it in next year. I think iPhone SE is a good choice', '>>{barbief} : If you want it now, go buy it. It has already dropped in price since its release. I bought one at the former price and soon after they lowered the price- I was not unhappy about that since even the original price was a great deal in my opinion.', '>>{Currency_Cat} : If you can wait until late 2017 onward, it seems as though Apple may be launching a new five-inch iPhone for those people who are not into the idea of holding a huge slab in their hands. If you do need to get a new phone now the SE is a great choice.', ">>{PavelDatsyuk} : It's got most of the hardware of the 6S so it's going to get software updates for the next three years at least. I wouldn't worry about what's around the corner when it's going to be a capable phone for years to come.", ">>{fortean} : The SE is an 6s with about half the pixels to move, missing only force touch. *IF* the size is fine to you it's an excellent purchase.", ">>{gapost} : After coming from Android, I used the SE for a few months and really liked it. A few days ago, I started using a 6s. Yes, the innards are very similar, several things are different. The touch screen seems better on the 6s. Often, the SE didn't register touches. Also, for whatever reason, the 6s seems just slightly faster. For me, the SE was just a little small and hard to read in some instances. Otherwise, the differences are the 3D touch (nice, but not essential), better front-facing camera (not a big deal to me), and brighter screen outside. The SE battery is a little better and I loved it, but the 6s gets me through a whole day with plenty to spare. Oh, and the fingerprint sensor is upgraded on the 6s and noticeably faster.", '>>{lukee910} : The 7 is 4.7", the 7 plus is 5.5". A 5" phone would nor be comparable to the 4" SE.', '>>{Jackson_Cook} : I love my SE, just got it last week', '>>{tkarocker} : I am in the exact same boat as you right now. I have a 16gb 6 and wanting to buy a 64gb SE. Would you buy a new or used SE?', '>>{Ten_Thirty_Three} : Next year is the 10th anniversary. Just wait, see what they got in stock.', ">>{Currency_Cat} : So you're saying that the possible five-inch is not simply a smaller version of the larger phones, you're saying the specs of such a phone will be rubbish? If so, that's a shame. I currently have a 5S and I haven't gone for an SE as I'm waiting to see if Apple bring out a more modern small phone.", '>>{JDeppel} : > missing only force touch And 2nd gen TouchID.', '>>{kybbwork} : 5" is bigger than the iphone 6, 6S and 7.', ">>{Astreix_} : How good is 2nd gen. It's basically instantaneous. I never used TouchID on my 6, it was slow and always needed to be deleted and set up again. I've had my 7+ since Oct and it hasn't failed yet. Amazing. Though I did buy an 2nd hand iPad Air 2 on Boxing Day and the TouchID on that is good, pretty fast too.", ">>{Currency_Cat} : Is it? Oh shit. What a bell end. I'd better get an SE then while they're still around.", '>>{HaiKarate} : We are at least 9 months away from the next iPhone launch. Yes, this is a good time to buy. The increased memory, alone, will dramatically change how you use the device.', ">>{chewytheunicorn} : iPhone SE is a phenomenal choice if you're into the design factor of the iPhone 5 but want more oomph than that device can deliver. Go for it.", '>>{al0kz} : Had to chance to use a SE and a 6s concurrently for some time before the I got my 7 Plus. There was a very negligible difference in the TouchID unlock speed between both phones. I think the SE even now is a great purchase (preferred it to the 6s)', '>>{uncertain-ithink} : I never got the issue of having to delete and redo fingerprints with my iPhone 6. It worked pretty consistently, just slowly compared to iPhone 6s and newer. If my fingers were slightly wet or the sensor was dirty it would not work at all. My 7 is less picky but it still happens. Much much faster recognition on 7 as well.', '>>{diceruler} : The former price dropped only for the 64 GB model', '>>{_Will_iam} : I would wait. You have a current phone that works.', ">>{EngineerinLA} : My wife has the SE and loves it. If you want the smaller phone but not sacrifice speed (same chip as the 6S) I'd get the SE.", '>>{Rubikh} : And premium build, and 1.2 mpx 2012 model selfie camera same as on my iphone 5, and no OiS on main camera', '>>{Rubikh} : They most likely are not going to release a new "small" model this year and noone can guarantee they will next year. Mainly because the spec difference is not at noticable thus the cycle of upgrade is not so often. Personally I would go for 5S rather than SE due to price difference between two', ">>{MS49SF} : That doesn't really help OP as they were looking at a phone with a 4 inch screen. They could already buy the iPhone 7 if they were looking at something in the 5 inch range (4.7in but close enough)", ">>{tecfrigo} : I bought the SE just before Christmas - coming from a 6+ I thought it was going to go badly with a smaller screen, but now I understand what the SE fuss is about. It's such a brilliant phone - best phone I've ever owned in fact, and I'm not a casual user, I use it all day for work and play. It's lightning fast for a start. The design is a massive improvement to the 6/7 which never felt comfortable in my hands (something I noticed even more after switching). The size, which I thought would be the biggest issue, is soooooo much better (for me at least, and I'm a large man) and one-handed use is absolutely brilliant for using the phone efficiently again. And the battery has been a real trooper, often lasting from one morning to the next evening! Never got that kind of mileage with the 6+. And it's so nice to hold to my ear as, you know, a phone. Like you, I was worried about picking up a phone that 'might' be near the end of its cycle and almost went for the 7 with no headphone jack (which I use all the time), force touch (don't care) and 2nd-gen TouchID (still don't care), but after a bit of thinking I realised the SE is almost half the price of the 7 (at least here in the UK) and it's got literally everything I want on my iPhone. And now I have it, I wish I had done it sooner and not stuck it out with the 6+, which now in comparison looks and feels like a fat old tramp. If they update it this year, so what? Sell your SE if it's worth upgrading and you won't be out much due to its already low price. If they don't upgrade it, you'll be glad you bought the SE. If you wait around wondering whether to get a current model or a potentially upgraded model months down the line, you could be waiting forever.", '>>{cut2size} : Buy a phone with force touch. Once you start using it you expect it to be on everything.', '>>{barbief} : I thought they both dropped. Regardless, OP indicated he wanted the 64GB anyhow. :)', ">>{PlasticPuller} : The 6S doesn't have optical image stabilisation, only the plus does.", '>>{Rubikh} : considering it was released in 2016 and lacks OIS is a big minus.', '>>{diceruler} : Even if he does get the 16 GB model its still a very great value!', ">>{theostrouble} : Have been out and didn't expect such a response - thank you all for your advice! Clearly I'm in the same boat as a few of you. The real factor here for me is price - getting 64gb seems like very good value to me, and I think I may actually like the idea of a smaller form factor and easier one handed use. But I'll soon find out as I have just ordered myself a shiny new space grey SE. Standby for a follow up regarding either a great decision or a regretful purchase...", ">>{theostrouble} : I was looking at a new one. Here in the UK I've just bought one for £429 which seemed like a good deal, as I'm not sure I can see myself dropping £700 odd for a 7 or 8 in the next couple of years.", ">>{Hurrah_for_Karamazov} : SE is the best phone I've ever owned. It is exceptional.", ">>{levert1} : For me, personally, my Touch ID does not recognize my fingerprints sometimes. I've been switching from mostly TouchID to four digit passcode. Honestly, I am trying to bring myself to like the SE, but I just can't like it. I miss the larger screen, so I am going to return mine tomorrow and get the 7+. However, what everyone else is saying is perfectly valid and if you're willing to sacrifice some features then I say go for it.", ">>{topdude155} : I personally preferred the slower TouchID. With my iPhone 7, if I press the home button to turn my phone on, it's open immediately but sometimes I want to access the camera.", '>>{ThatsRRtoYou} : I went from a 6S to an SE and love it.', '>>{ThatsRRtoYou} : I went from a 6S to an SE and love it.', ">>{GPP1974} : Don't do it. A new iPhone will come out within the next 5 years and you don't want to be fucked over.", ">>{jnvdh06} : I came from a 6s 16gb to an SE 64gb. Love the extra space. Performance is the same if not slightly better. Love the screen size. Love the battery, between 6-8 hours usage time every day. Only real con is to front camera, only 1.2mp but I dont really take selfies so doesn't bother me. Dont miss force touch as I rarely used it. Also dont miss the fast finger print sensor as I like to view notifications before unlocking the phone. Price is also great. Great build quality.", ">>{gabrielquilez} : I bought the SE over a month ago because my 6 died, it's the best phone I've bought! I thought coming from the 6 would be a negative, but after a whole day of use I got used to the screen. It's seriously fast and smooth with that A9 Chip, even faster than the 7! The 12MP camera is phenomenal and battery life is WAY better than the 6, for me. If size isn't a problem, you should buy it!"], ['>>{Craig-HD} : A Sanders surge in California? Hillary Clinton loses ground in stronghold', '>>{JZcgQR2N} : Lol he realizes he\'s losing badly at the last minute, so out of desperation he tries to court Bay area natives by attending a Warriors game, panders the LGBJ community showing up at a gay bar, and tries to appeal to Latinos by crashing a Spanish festival where he promptly gets kicked out for not planning it well enough, all under the guise of, according to his supporters, "just trying to have fun". Not to mention despite the fact he out raised Hillary in donations, his campaign failed to open more voting stations in Puerto Rico. Meanwhile his supporters, some of the biggest hypocritical and most condescending assholes ever, continue to attack Clinton and Trump for pandering (something Bernie should have done way before it was too late), violently riots against rally goers when they are unable get their opinions shoved down non-supporters\' throats, and continue to up-vote the same kind of pro-Bernie "news" every hour while silently mass down voting pro-Hillary or pro-Trump articles because they\'re "biased" or "unreliable". Bernie is a fucking loser who doesn\'t know how to appeal to the majority of Democrats and he and his delusional supporters think they know what the people wants better than they do themselves.', '>>{gladBats} : It\'s kind of crazy, how headlines are phrased. Like it\'s some epic fantasy battle between opposing armies instead of the everyday folks who are trying to live their lives and do what they think is right. It\'s all meant to divide people, make them less likely to cooperate and "join sides." It\'s not interesting enough (somehow) on its own, Americans have to glorify it. Crazy stuff.', ">>{ItchyIrishBalls} : Well ya, people are realizing Wall St Hillary and slick reality show, meme, nickname man are a joke and have no concrete plans. But the media and we're all going to die to Mexicans crowd are doing their best to fight it.", '>>{Fluffyfishbasket} : You sure spend a lot of time posting about how much you dislike him, hell, part of this post is copy and pasted from a post you made 40 mins prior lol.', ">>{majikmyk} : Say what you will about his campaign technique... But the issues he's running on are still better than the alternatives.", '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : Ready for the Clinton Establishment to whine about this post in 3....2....1....', '>>{Cupinacup} : Oh hey, people are still citing the same poll that has Clinton up by 10% over Sanders with likely voters.', '>>{winstonjpenobscot} : [Original post from which this was copied: https://m.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4mqymz/sanders_movement_will_go_on_as_peoples_summit_is/d3xqbcu)]', ">>{SoTiredOfWinning} : She won the last two contests with 60%, she will win NJ just as big. He has no momentum or money going into california. The polls do not paint a rosy picture for him either. Even in this very poll she's up 10%.", ">>{SoTiredOfWinning} : [NPR reporter: Sanders gets kicked out of Spanish event](https://i.sli.mg/GWMnOR.png) video https://www.instagram.com/p/BGSjQHfIr5a/ It's getting sad now.", ">>{RIPrince} : Why would anyone whine about it? It doesn't matter if Sanders wins California unless its 80-20%.", '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : Why would the already nominee continue to lose states? I thought it was settled? Hmnm....', ">>{Jkoy} : There isn't enough delegates for Bernie so, a more liberal state siding with him ain't no biggie", ">>{EtriganZ} : So desperate for pro-Sanders news that y'all are resorting to an Indian news outlet?", '>>{gunt_master} : Let me clear this part up first of all: California was never a "stronghold" for Clinton.', ">>{RIPrince} : She probably won't lose California, but it doesn't really matter. Hillary has a larger lead over Sanders than Obama had over Clinton in 2008. Everyone in the world didn't really think it was a problem that Obama was considered the presumptive winner over a month before voting ended. You love your Bernie. That's cool, I like him too. But he isn't winning, so why are you being strange about this? P.S. After Obama pretty much clinched it in late April, Obama then went on to lose Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, Puerto Rico and South Dakota to Clinton. That didn't change anything then, and if Sanders wins California on Tuesday it isn't changing anything now.", ">>{kornian} : Obama didn't have an impending FBI indictment hanging over him.", '>>{GroriousNipponSteer} : >A more liberal state Yeah, California with nearly 60 million residents and an economy numbering ~$3T is nothing but another "more liberal state".', ">>{fier9224} : Possible impending FBI indictment. She's the only presidential candidate that could be found to be a criminal by the federal government.", ">>{RIPrince} : Not true actually, Trump may have a RICO case coming down with Trump U. Possible is different than impending. Considering that the email situation is very complicated and is unknown legal territory (first case of it's kind if it goes to trial) it seems unlikely to me to proceed unless the FBI and DOJ feel they have an airtight case.", ">>{RIPrince} : Not really. There's nothing impending about an indictment to Clinton. Possible? Yeah. Probably? No. Impending? Lol.", ">>{fier9224} : Ok, so she's the only democratic candidate to ever have an investigation pending. Point still stands.", '>>{growyurown} : You are correct. Nothing imminent. The clinton foundation most likely already made some strategic business investments to ensure she wont be.', ">>{RIPrince} : > How dumb are you? that's a civil suit. Pretty dumb I guess: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/donald-trump-gonzalo-curiel/485636/ >Cohen, on the other hand, **targets Trump through a provision of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act**, more commonly known as the RICO Act—the same statute federal prosecutors use to bring down mob bosses. In essence, Low accuses Trump University of engaging in fraudulent business practices, while Cohen frames Trump University itself as a criminal enterprise with Trump as the orchestrator of a racketeering scheme. As you can imagine, Trump strongly opposes that characterization. In a motion for summary judgment in Cohen filed in March, he condemned the “pervasive abuse of civil RICO” that he says the case represents. “Indeed, if this case is allowed to proceed, it would represent an unprecedented and unprincipled expansion of civil RICO and transform virtually every alleged violation of consumer protection laws into a civil RICO claim,” Trump argued. There's a civil suit, and a RICO case being prepared. If they prove the RICO case, then criminal charges become far more likely.", ">>{RIPrince} : What point? She's also winning the nomination. FBI investigations don't lead to delegates being docked.", '>>{RIPrince} : Follow the money maaaaaan, Hillary is the devil no matter what maaaaan. Bush did 9/11.', '>>{growyurown} : Yep. Keeping thinking she has your best interest in mind. Santa Claus is coming to your house along with the tooth fairy also. Where did I say anything about 9/11? Where did I say anything about conspiracy? Typical Hillary bot.', ">>{RIPrince} : She doesn't give a shit about me. But she will enact policies I like, so it's good enough for me. I don't really care that she was dumb about her email server.", '>>{fier9224} : An investigation could cause superdelegates to lose confidence and switch their vote.', ">>{RIPrince} : All the SD's are aware of the investigation. Exactly 0 have switched their vote due to it.", ">>{fier9224} : Honestly I don't expect many to switch. But maybe, just maybe the Democrats realize the national shame resulting from supporting a presidential candidate that may or may not be a criminal.", ">>{RIPrince} : Generally it's innocent until proven guilty. Apparently the people at the top don't consider the email thing an imminent threat. They aren't reading every single right-wing rag that says bad stuff about Clinton. Brietbart, the NY Post, Wash examiner, NRO, etc. 90% of the anti-Clinton stuff on this board is from that garbage, it tends to distort reality.", ">>{RIPrince} : Lovely Tuesday night isn't it. What a Bernie landslide in California.", '>>{tramplers6} : Yep.. I bet there are Sanders supporters in lot of older threads too..Go look them up and gloat if it makes you happy..', ">>{RIPrince} : I don't mind anyone being a Sanders supporter. I like Sanders.", '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : The state where the AP pulled a hitjob for Hillary?', ">>{RIPrince} : Oh yeah, that's the reason Bernie is losing, because of an AP article the night before the election. Are you really this deluded or do you just like lying to yourself? Do you think Bernie would have 200,000 more votes if not for that AP article? Lol man.", '>>{RIPrince} : Sorry I need to adjust my numbers now, Bernie is down by 420,000 votes with 90% reporting. So 420,000 people who were going to vote for Sanders, switched their vote for Clinton because of an AP article yesterday. Sounds legit.', '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : Are you ready deluded tough think that calling a primary on the eve of a big vote does not impact the integrity of the vote?', '>>{RIPrince} : It made zero difference. Show evidence that it did.', '>>{MakingRedditGreat} : You sounds like either a very naive person or a very dishonest one', ">>{RIPrince} : It didn't have any affect on him winning or losing, so what's the difference?"], ['>>{Usecod} : Well he tried to influence in for Hillary,but he failed.The next time Mark you should try harder.', '>>{oroyplata} : Anecdotally, all the Trumpisms and click bait leading up the election were definitely lopsided in Trump\'s favor. 4chan will claim victory in a "meme war" and I don\'t know that they\'re necessarily wrong.', '>>{Cpt_Nosferatu} : Yeah a platform for sharing unsubstantiated fake news with a few hundred of your "friends", totally doesn\'t affect anything.', ">>{Panda413} : tldr the_donald is the biggest safe space on reddit and they're all too oblivious to realize they are exactly what they claim to hate.", ">>{AttackSkunk} : I don't believe it. That's why my Chrismas gifts to my relatives and in-laws that passed around ridiculous Facebook memes as truth will be donations made in their names to the Democratic party.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : Facebook to advertisers: We definitely influence buying and consumer behavior. Facebook to public: We can't possibly influence voter behavior.", ">>{oroyplata} : It's almost as easy to get banned on /r/the_donald as it is on /r/politics.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : It's not just 4chan; there were plenty of Macedonian clickbait sites that made a pile of money during this election.", '>>{PrzzTrump} : His influence, if any, will pale in comparison to the articles liberals and democrats are constantly positing on here in order to circle jerk themselves into a bigger rage. They are doing this to justify more riots and assaults.', ">>{DeltaEchoXray} : It's not Facebook's fault that a good portion of the country is improperly educated and knows nothing about fact-checking or verifying sources...or that most people don't even read beyond a headline.", '>>{wytxcook} : Instagram had Hillarious memes. Lots of crossover on the various platforms, but the best stuff favored Trump.', '>>{Buttocks} : Why do people keep insisting that fake news only helped Trump?', ">>{Panda413} : If you're being serious, your inability to accurately observe reality is sad. I can say Hillary is the devil. I can say Obama is a Muslim and founded ISIS. I can say Trump is a good person and has an IQ higher than a 4th grader. All would be lies, none would get me banned from r/politics.", ">>{Panda413} : It's important to note that it is a FORCED echo chamber. Meaning if you share an opinion that goes against the echo chamber, your comment will be deleted and you will be banned from posting content. The echo chamber we see on subreddits like r/politics and r/protectandserve are very different, and much less embarrassing. Users downvote content they don't like and upvote content they agree with, but moderators of these subs are not silencing opposing views that are stated within the guidelines of the subreddit.", ">>{roboboogienights} : plain as the nose on your face... to say it didn't is simply to lie, either to the world or yourself. and he probably knows it, he's just trying to save his skin.", '>>{pwomptastic} : This sub, a sub that was dominated with astroturfers posting an article from the huffington post, a newspaper run by Ariana Huffington who offered to work for one of the campaigns, posts an article about facebook, another social media site where fake news abounded denying any influence in election. My brain...', '>>{sedgwickian} : Another tech billionaire proving he knows a lot about coding and little about anything else. If we survive trump, the next threat will be these guys thinking they should run for office (looking at you, Mark Cuban)', '>>{golikehellmachine} : Facebook actually did a study to try to implement fact-checking in their Top Stories. They decided not to implement it when it turned out that pro-Trump/anti-Clinton stories were *overwhelmingly* the majority of the stories that would be flagged.', ">>{oroyplata} : > If you're being serious, your inability to accurately observe reality is sad. Sad, huh. Appreciate the compassion. Ever call someone a shill or even hint at it on this sub? WHAM! Ban hammer, bro. They swing it pretty liberally too. So, yeah, you can go to /r/the_donald and call God Emperor Trump an orange fucking muppet and get banned ... Out here, speak your mind and call out blatant shilling, however politely, and get the same result.", ">>{leftbutnotthatfar} : It's harder to sell to people who know they are being sold to. Wtf do you expect him to say lol. I love it though, make em dance", '>>{imonreddittoo} : If democracy in America has reached the point that people are deciding who to vote for based on a bunch of fucking frog memes, maybe it really is time to burn the whole damn thing to the ground and start over.', ">>{golikehellmachine} : > Wtf do you expect him to say lol. Well, I *didn't* expect him to unintentionally say his entire business model is complete garbage, which is exactly what he's saying here.", ">>{Panda413} : My apologies... > almost as easy You simply don't know what those words mean. Carry on.", ">>{golikehellmachine} : You could've stopped at TLDR. I mean, no need to state the obvious."], ['>>{garzie2016} : Word ‘Dozen’ Heard During Debate: Proof Hillary Clinton Wearing An Ear Piece?', '>>{IDFSHILL} : Want to know how republicans know they lost a debate? When they declare victory while at the same time spewing random conspiracy theories about how it was rigged.', ">>{US_Bennett} : I hope somebody is documenting all these desperate conspiracy theories, for posterity's sake.", '>>{garzie2016} : How about watching the video and then coming back and commenting?', '>>{CerseiClinton} : Eat a dick. Love trumps hate 2016...', '>>{limited8} : > Now, you notice there is no teleprompter here tonight, which is probably smart, because maybe you saw Donald dismantle his prompter the other day. And I get that. They’re hard to keep up with, and I’m sure it’s even harder when you’re translating from the original Russian.', ">>{Assangeknows} : Why won't these nasty women let us defame them!!!!", ">>{OatmealFor3v3r} : They can't seem to accept another candidate can be more prepared and better overall.", ">>{CerseiClinton} : Oh for Christ sake I don't support Trump. Try being civil.", '>>{FlyingSquid} : Anything but acknowledge a *woman* could be smart and confident and prepared...', ">>{SReject} : don't forget the top secret, super-duper, quantum electrostatic precision-directional ultra-sonar audio transmitter that beams what to say directly into Hillary's head! (do I really need the /s?)", '>>{Morchaint} : I love the narrative that there is a secret global conspiracy to rule the world, but that it can be exposed by people capturing videos of what they see on TV.', '>>{RedDorf} : Bush wore a mic! "Clinton wore an ear piece!" At this point, I\'m glad the candidates aren\'t wearing drool bibs.', ">>{ITGuy_higgins} : *(reads headline)* There it is, the dumbest fucking thing I'll see all day... *(slams beer)*", '>>{Assangeknows} : Saying eat a dick to yet another conspiracy theory from a racist is all the nicety I can muster', ">>{SReject} : The only true way to know they are winning is if they are concentrating on suppressing some minority's vote", ">>{Another-Chance} : Who is stupid enough to believe that shit? Oh yeah. Conservatives. They also believe in a magic sky fairy who cures cancer if you say amen and then like a post. If Hillary wins I will make a ton of money off those dumbasses with website/book that just makes up bullshit (like the op's 'article').", '>>{FredFredrickson} : Why is it totally impossible for these people to believe that she is just a smart person who can think on her toes?', ">>{CerseiClinton} : I just find it odd when people respond to things in much the same way we could expect Trump to respond when they're against his hate speech.", ">>{FredFredrickson} : It's be funny to see their origin date and rise/fall in popularity on a timeline, with political events (debates, leaks, etc.) corresponding to them.", ">>{Elryc35} : You hope it's the dumbest thing you'll hear all day, but it's still way too early to call off that race.", '>>{Assangeknows} : No see, I said eat a dick to a lie. Not eat a dick to the DNI and CIA. Both sides are not equal', '>>{Tewks44} : The video has the earmarks of a fake. First of all it claims she\'s using an earpiece. However the evidence is someone whispering "dozens" being picked up on audio. How does Hilary wearing an earpiece account for this? I struggle to draw the connection between an ear piece and Hillary\'s mic picking up someone\'s whispers. If you\'re suggesting her earpiece audio was picked up by the mic, why would they be whispering? Why would that be the only thing it picked up? Secondly, why is the "proof" a recording OF a YouTube video. This is something that would be very easy to fake. It wouldn\'t even require any post processing. How do we know the person filming isn\'t just simply whispering "dozen" at a brief pause in Clinton\'s remarks? Personally I\'ve given this video a far more reasoned response than it deserves. To put it bluntly, it is laughable. EDIT: I looked into it some more and it appears the audio isn\'t being fabricated. However there\'s a far more simple explanation. Trump smacked his lips and HIS mic picked it up. Rewatch and pay close attention to Trump\'s mouth. As an aside I feel ridiculous for even indulging in this. This is the last time I try to entertain a conspiracy theorist.', '>>{LittleShrub} : Yes, Hillary did great at the debate. It\'s called "preparing" conspiracy morons.', ">>{Assangeknows} : I will. And I'll continue mocking little wishy washy contrarians like you", '>>{seanr9ne} : >No see, I said eat a dick to a lie Actual Post >Eat a dick conservative conspiracy theorists Rookay', ">>{CerseiClinton} : Well aren't you just a lil' ray of sunshine.", ">>{Assangeknows} : They're lying, do you want me clarify further?", ">>{stonebone4} : That's one of Trump's gross wet mouth sounds. His mouth literally moves [at the exact millisecond](https://youtu.be/Ffq9jfvVato?t=22) the sound is heard. Jesus people.", ">>{woodtick57} : if you play it backwards, it quotes the entirety of Karl Marx's manifesto.", '>>{Assangeknows} : You\'re like that dude at the end of the 2nd debate. "Hillary, Donald has called for your execution, he says you have hate in your heart and that you should be in jail...what do you like about him" *smiles*', ">>{seanr9ne} : You should clarify the last post, if that's the case. There is a difference between a liar and their lies. One is a tangible thing.", '>>{reshp2} : Ear pieces, getting questions ahead of time... is it possible she actually just prepared well for the debate?', '>>{Assangeknows} : So your problem is with the lack of plurality of my word liar?', ">>{seanr9ne} : No, the plural form of liar is liars. The plural form of lie is lies. Those are two completely different things. You didn't say liar, you said lie.", ">>{stonebone4} : Seriously. Live TV has a time delay of a few seconds so they can quickly cut away in case something crazy happens. If the Illuminati could be heard giving Hillary instructions I'm sure they would have taken care of that right???", ">>{Assangeknows} : Okay the fact that I've told lying liars to eat a dick for the lie they get old is where I'm ending this. If you're this lonely for contact call a bud", ">>{seanr9ne} : Just reminding you that one statement is rather innocuous, the other is borderline sexual assault. If you're that lonely for sexual favors, call a prostitute.", '>>{garzie2016} : I looked at that part for myself to see if it was real. I heard the dozens too.', '>>{Assangeknows} : My statement is sexual assault? Are you kidding?', ">>{km89} : I'm sorry, but am I understanding this correctly? Is this article claiming that Clinton had an earpiece that was *screaming* into her ear loud enough to be picked up by the microphone, but was also discrete enough that nobody from the Trump side saw it to raise a fuss about?", '>>{seanr9ne} : Demanding that an unwilling party fellate you can be construed as such. Demanding that a lie fellate you is not possible. Forgetting the Billy Bush tapes already, bro?', ">>{daybreaker} : > There it is, the dumbest fucking thing I'll see all day... > It's only 10am central. I seriously doubt this will be the dumbest thing you'll see from the Trumpsters today.", '>>{garzie2016} : Blog? I find it funny how you assume this is my "blog" and not just me posting something I found off the internet. I also find it funny that you call a news article a blog. lol', '>>{MC_Fap_Commander} : Politicians do that shit for a living. They\'re good at. They don\'t need any help. If a person is dim and says "how\'d she do so good in that there debate thing?" I\'m sorry for you. There are MANY Republicans who could everything Hillary did (maybe even better than she did). You picked a terrible candidate. Stop embarrassing yourself.', ">>{tehSlothman} : So what you're saying is Trump's the one feeding her the lines???????", ">>{lolpoliticsthrowaway} : I said this the last time around when the ear piece nonsense came up. Give this a try just for kicks. Have someone call you on the phone, and repeat back what they're saying without making it extremely obvious that's what you're doing. It is extremely difficult to parrot what someone is saying in real time with no mistakes, and to make it sound like your natural cadence.", '>>{scram_jones} : Where?! That dude owes me six bucks.', ">>{wavescrashover} : Christ... They've claimed ear piece and every debate so far and each time it's proven she didn't wear one.", '>>{bpadair31} : Because for most of them it is simply not possible that a woman can do something better than a man.', ">>{deflagration83} : This is ludicrous. You know what you don't hear on their microphones? Breathing. You know why? Because those microphones cannot pick up sounds that subtle. In order for the word to have been loud enough to be picked up on the microphone if it were coming from an inner earpiece it also would have been loud enough to blow her ear drum. No. Just no.", ">>{ballerina12-24} : Stonebone4 is coming too close to the truth, we will need to add him to the 'Clinton Death List' before he exposes us even more!", ">>{garzie2016} : Not my article, but your blinded by your hate so it's understandable.", ">>{MC_Fap_Commander} : Sorry, I couldn't read your comment. The hate blindness makes it impossible for me to see. I'll pick up some Hillary Parkinson's glasses later and see if they help.", ">>{Ow_wow} : Sorry, you won't get a discussion when you post an article that is 100% foolishness.", ">>{Ow_wow} : The day is young, and Rudy Giuliani will be speaking *somewhere*, so you're sure to be right.", '>>{garzie2016} : 100%? SOMETHING could be heard regardless. Your just dismissing it because you favor Hillary more than Trump.', '>>{garzie2016} : Sounds good. I hope your insurance covers it, I know they can be really expensive.']]

classify and reply

['>>{FockerCRNA} : I have a feeling that monetization of the presidency is the driving motivation behind this candidacy. Not saying they are unique, but a little more out in the open maybe.', ">>{mic9ael} : >likely the first time the daughter of a major party nominee has promoted a clothing line in conjunction with her father's presidential campaign. He's got the whole family scamming America", '>>{mrsuns10} : So any of you guys think I have a chance with her', '>>{thesmartfool} : ...aparently Hillary has to comfort herself in her prized looks to feel good about herself.', ">>{mwsomerset} : I wonder if Hillary will be getting a cut of all future jackets bought....didn't think so. Hillary is not running for president to make a buck nor is any member of her family trying to capitalize on it.", '>>{tankguy41} : Sen. Marco Rubio says he was hacked by Russia during campaign, again 24 hours ago', '>>{mic9ael} : One word: Deflect ^deflect ^^deflect ^^^deflect', '>>{beapop} : Clinton Campaign Admit They Pay An Army Of Online Trolls « SGTreport – The Corporate Propaganda Antidote', '>>{FissureKing} : Is Rubio saying that the Trump Presidency is illegitimate?', '>>{daveg243} : Of course they do. Noone is dumb enough to vote for a career criminal like Hillary.', ">>{mwsomerset} : Maybe you aren't...the millions of people this foundation helps appreciate it.", '>>{farcetragedy} : nah, probably more to do with increasing visibility of the Trump brand. and, of course, giving himself and his rich friends massive tax cuts.', '>>{farcetragedy} : you do understand the difference between a charity and a business, right?', '>>{beapop} : Sorry, should have found a Huffington post or CNN article.', ">>{HonoredPeople} : Russia wanted someone that was extremely friendly to Russian interests. Mostly because of the Oil sanctions that are currently in place on Russian directly. They really need to sell that Oil or else they are shit broke. Once Russia goes the way of Greece, old Putin might start looking to flee to Ecuadorian embassy with his pal Assange. Notation 1 - I don't like what Russia did, but I can understand the reasons why they did it. They don't have much of a choice.", '>>{wextippler} : A current majority of Americans are. Enjoy the suicide watch until November, the GOP is toasting itself.', '>>{baeb66} : Big government liberals and their expensive big government programs! Trump has an army of mouth breathing trolls that he pays nothing.', '>>{breakTFoundation} : Thats what the op is muddy the waters. We know how the Clinton Machine is in bed with CNN.', ">>{farcetragedy} : Hilarious that they're fine with Trump taking money from the Saudis that goes right in his pocket and benefits him, but if the Clinton *charity* takes money from the Saudis that's used for *charity* and doesn't go in their pocket . . . IT'S A HUGE CONSPIRACY!!!!", '>>{_CtrlAltLeft_} : If I look at my server logs, I get tens of thousands of "hack" attempts every day. Bots scan IP addresses and try to use vulnerabilities to "hack" in. I get bot requests from China, Russia, France, Vietnam, India... literally all over the world. Considering that you can get a VPN for pennies on the dollar, the source could literally be from anywhere not necessarily those specific countries. This is gaslighting, fake news, alt-left propaganda.', ">>{breakTFoundation} : yes with a charity you have to give yourself payouts or cover your expenses and can't just do it in an instant", ">>{DumpsterDon} : It's 2032. Trump is President. The SJW threat is overwhelming. How will he escape?", ">>{breakTFoundation} : Don't mention the leaks don't mention the leaks don't mention the leaks", '>>{mic9ael} : Deflect ^deflect ^^deflect ^^^deflect Try to stay on topic here - this is a thread about Ivanka whoring her clothing', ">>{andyb5} : Don't worry, once he's inside the White House, he will be safe and secure even from nukes.", '>>{Disadvorange} : Both of those are better sources than somewhere that has an article titled, "The TRUE HISTORY of America’s FALSE FLAG WARS".', '>>{daveg243} : If by majority you mean basement dwellers and paid shills you are right. Going to enjoy swimming in your tears.', '>>{Neo2199} : Better call the Snake; come to think of it, maybe not.', ">>{Disadvorange} : Mind if I save this, and then come back on November 10th to laugh at you like I'm Eric Cartman and you're Scott Tennerman?", ">>{Disco_Dhani} : Russia chose to annex Crimea in 2014, which is what resulted in crippling economic sanctions placed upon them by the West. Putin didn't have to do that, and instead of backing off, he decided to double down by waging information warfare against the West. Putin's actions are unsurprising, though, given: his only jobs in his entire life have been KGB spy and Russian President/Prime Minister; his 17-year history of dictatorship, murder, greed, corruption, and mass propaganda as Russia's leader; his unrelenting desire of conquest; his deep hatred or fear of the West and Western values like democracy; and his mission to renew the Russian Empire.", ">>{alkaraki} : So he says he got hack attempt. Which is really common as you said. But also its fake news because he didn't get a hack attack? Also what the hell is the alt left", '>>{Writerhaha} : Yes and so Eric and Donald Jr could get in for NY politics. The whole family has an angle.', '>>{lillyluminatus} : How about an international one of those? Escape him from the United States. Please!', ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : Don't take the tunnels. Getting stuck in them would take Stallone to get out of.", ">>{Disadvorange} : Holy hell, that's an actual thing? That's almost as good as TimeCube.", ">>{HonoredPeople} : Yep. All of that is correct. Putin's only move was to destabilize the UN and America.", ">>{politicsacc87} : They wouldn't have to spend so much time on this if he and his family would just use the White House like a normal president", ">>{vph} : They are recycling 3-month old news to attack Clinton now? That's pathetic.", '>>{chefbda} : So how much cheese pizza do you get From NAMBLA for posting the same stuff over and over???', '>>{Quexana} : How far right must one be where Marco Rubio\'s words are deemed "alt-left" propaganda?', '>>{hazenthephysicist} : Wait, I can get paid for trolling Trump supporters? Sign me up!', ">>{Angry_Comment_Bot} : Plus if Rus is a flea market they might sell some antiques from the 60's and 70's", ">>{daveg243} : Its a deal. But only if you bring your swimmies. Don't want you drowning while I laugh.", '>>{d_mcc_x} : >Also what the hell is the alt left The new boogie man for the right.', ">>{pseudolocus} : I'm surprised there hasn't been some grand economic pact with China, tbh. But I'm also surprised at how far China has come around to building cleaner tech.", '>>{aledlewis} : I take it he ended term limits and clung to power using new executive powers and, presumably, a new doctor.', ">>{Corgy} : I agree that Putin's actions were atrocious, that he is a tyrant and an ulcer spreading against democracy - but when the Warsaw Pact and the USSR broke up, the Russians agreed to retreat in peace if Belarus and Ukraine stayed in their sphere of influence, acting as a buffer. So, when EU and NATO openly invited Ukraine to switch allegiance, they went against the spirit of the post cold war order. I concede that it's not fair to the Ukrainian people, but nevertheless it was foolish not to expect a violent Russian reaction. Saving face is of exceptional importance for a strongman...", '>>{wyldcat} : [Don\'t be so sure of that:](http://edition.cnn.com/2016/12/22/politics/donald-trump-strengthen-expand-nuclear-capability/) > > In Moscow earlier Tuesday, Putin said in a defense speech that Russia needs to "enhance the combat capability of strategic nuclear forces, primarily by strengthening missile complexes that will be guaranteed to penetrate existing and future missile defense systems." > > Putin\'s remarks appeared to suggest that he was talking about new weapons systems that could overcome US missile defenses, a development that could force the US to respond. It was not clear, however, if he was contemplating an expansion in the total numbers of Russian weapons or of the stocks of those arms that are deployed.', '>>{wyldcat} : He could always go through the swampy sewers, he would fit right in there.', '>>{winstonknox96} : I know some guys up here that would love to see that bitch come up through here', '>>{solartai} : Nope, Doc is still with Trump. They get together each year to flip a coin and, in a bizarre play by statistics, it landed on heads every time. So Trump ended up staying healthy.', '>>{raynespark} : I want to see some kind of escape pod as used by Blofeld in Thunderball, or Dr. Evil in Austin Powers.', ">>{farcetragedy} : what payouts? yes, charities have overhead. that's the way charities work. sorry.", ">>{redshirting} : Clinton supporters are gonna complain about tbs? Candidates using their campaigns to promote theit brand (ie Ben Carson) aren't uncommon. Including clinton herself ofc", ">>{Writerhaha} : I'm on Reddit between work hours on a Friday....of course I'm a damn billionaire!", '>>{Stellaaahhhh} : Serious question; how does one become a paid troll? Asking for a friend.', ">>{Stellaaahhhh} : Dang. That's pretty out in the open. I'm tempted, but they say turning a hobby into work takes all the joy out of it.", '>>{christopherNV} : As much as it takes, nom sayin, as much as it takes.', ">>{tau-lepton} : It's also been posted twenty times in the last two days.", '>>{Bobby_Marks2} : I had considered this. His candidacy has put three of his kids on the map, a big deal when you consider that only one of them is likely to run the family company from here on out. Watch them get their own TV shows, their own political campaigns, and their own celebrity status. This campaign took them from rich family to dynasty.', ">>{ZappaZoo} : I wonder if her line is made in China or Mexico like the old man's.", ">>{mwsomerset} : and they even paid her for speeches....who has ever heard of such a thing...politicians getting paid big bucks to speak. Reagan was paid 2 million dollars after he left office to speak in Japan. Seems there was some trade deals or something with Japan before he left office...can't recall the details. The man was in the beginning of Alzheimer's for goodness sakes.", '>>{Writerhaha} : Exactly. In five years the Trump family will be completely legitimate.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Reminds of the Kennedy family from decades ago. Kennedy's had their scandals and screw ups, but they served this country with distinction.", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : He's got like 10 trillion in tax cuts planned for his budget. More supply side nonsense. And said that if it didn't work out they'd look at cutting social security and medicare to shore up the difference.", '>>{Plisskens_snake} : No one cares about the leaks. Think one week news cycle.', '>>{farcetragedy} : yep. his platform is really not that different than any other R candidate from the last 35 years.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Must be a knockoff dress. Or she's posing.", '>>{Writerhaha} : Exactly. The only difference is it\'s a heck of a lot easier to be rich, shady, and have a "brand" then actually serve people. You don\'t seem to need that part now. I say with complete assurance that there will be a Kardashian/Jenner and Trump in elected office in my lifetime, and possibly multiple presidencies.', '>>{breakTFoundation} : >No one cares about the leaks. If the MSM was the sole arbiter of news not. The bernie sphere on social media is like an angry flock of brids chasing a predator.', '>>{mwsomerset} : They are very wealthy....They made a killing on their autobiographies and speaking fees. I might add they did not get rich until Bill left the presidency and wrote his book.', ">>{Disadvorange} : This is gonna be fun. Just for giggles, do you have, like, *any* path he can take to get back that doesn't heavily rely on hoping for a Julian Assange hail mary?", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Nah. This is all Trumpsters pushing this rubbish. Sanders is off the board. There's no bottom with Trump. Look what he did to Ted Cruz's family. Classy. I expect he'll go full tabloid against Hillary. And if you like that kind of stuff then vote for him. Because that will be the content of his administration. Slime eight days a week straight out of our oval office.", '>>{Disadvorange} : Are you accusing me of being a CTR shill? Seriously?', '>>{Stuckinaloop} : Well at least she is only selling clothes and not political influence like HRC.', '>>{breakTFoundation} : Comparing Cruz to bernie supporters is silly. They gave this guy 220 million Dollar and they got conned.', '>>{farcetragedy} : > just for a quick penny. Or [7 billion.](http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/288648-trumps-family-would-get-a-71-billion-windfall-from-estate-tax-plan) but yes, i agree that power and attention are a huge part of the draw for Trump.', '>>{jzpenny} : Thanks for helping to turn the greatest engine for human knowledge ever developed into a tool of opinion control for whoever has the most money to throw around. I\'m sure that will work out so well for your progressive values in the end. And also thanks for ruining my party and my country while you\'re at it. This sort of "era of the new low" is what Clinton sows, and what we\'ll reap on her behalf if the people of this country allow themselves to be manipulated by your shameful bullshit. Anyway, that was pretty harsh. So [I\'ll just leave this bit from my favorite comedian here to cheer you up](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tvp97SMZc6M).', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Keep spreading that bull shit. I'm sure it works for you.", '>>{mwsomerset} : Honey....if you think this is a new phenomenon ...politicians leaving office and making a buck...then you have not been paying attention. Remember Sarah Palin...quit her job ...tried to copyright her name...to make a buck...and she is still bilking rubes with her pac.', ">>{OPsyduck} : I mean seriously, how can people think that everything is normal? Not a single anti-Hillary threads are getting to the front page anymore and YET people still dislike her as much. I know she has genuine voters, but there's absolutely people getting paid to do this.", ">>{Scoutster13} : Apparetly I'm one although until the other day I didn't even know what CTR meant. Funny, I have yet to receive a paycheck. I've been here mostly for entertainment purposes but if I can get paid too I'm down with that.", ">>{mwsomerset} : Honey is an endearment for both males and females...its as well. You might want to google Ms. Palin's skating rink scandal in Wasilla.", ">>{creejay} : Hi, I'm also interested. Can send me link?", ">>{farcetragedy} : hold on, you're saying Trump lied about his net worth?", ">>{hotlikesauce27} : No, I'm not implying anything. The narrative for the last couple of months is he lied about his net worth. I guess we have to wait until he releases those tax returns", '>>{daveg243} : You just trade your soul for 5 bucks an hour. Kinda like Hillary when she was young and needed the money.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Yeah it's called marketing . This is shocking how exactly ?", ">>{poop_gravy} : I guess you haven't seen the poll lately. She is shellacking Trump. Many people said the Kahn thing was over the line and stopped supporting him. Even republican politicians and business figures have come out saying they're voting for Clinton. The tide changed. Trump lost.", '>>{Binturung} : And thus, why this sub has been a cesspool. At least I haven\'t seen any "very smart people said this ridiculous lie" posts today. So that\'s a start.', ">>{OPsyduck} : Can you read or you are also a shill? She might be leading in polls, but she's still disliked by a MAJORITY of people. So it's not normal to have nothing against Hillary on the front page for like 3-4 days now. If people liked her so much on this site, her subbreddit would be way bigger. Also your account is 3hrs old, so yea :)", ">>{jzpenny} : > I mean seriously, how can people think that everything is normal? They don't. Get away from the internet for a bit and talk to normal people. Everyone is freaked out and disgusted. All the moreso because they turn on the TV or radio (or, increasingly, popular venues of the internet) and now notice that it's just lying to them, hypnotizing them to forget about reality and believe in this fantasy world where Hillary Clinton is their heroic savior from Literally Hitler.", ">>{untildeath} : There's a dark side to it, though. You're also paid to muddy the waters regarding Hillary's corruption and you're also paid to sabotage actually goodhearted people like Sanders and Stein.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : >Thanks for helping to turn the greatest engine for human knowledge ever developed into a tool of opinion control You give Clinton far too much credit if you think she invented this concept. >And also thanks for ruining my party and my country while you're at it. Are talking about the democratic party? Bernie Sanders ruined it by pandering to SJWs with pie in the sky proposals. He enraged the left wing OWS nuts.", ">>{poop_gravy} : Yes, and Trump is disliked by an even larger margin, what's your point? Facts are facts. Your candidate is a huge loser and is going to lose by historical amounts.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : I've come around on political corruption over the last year. I now realize that corrupt insider politics is far better than an 'open' system, which gives us Trump (or Brexit, or Le Pen etc). I'll take the insiders over the insane. I was never a fan of Bernie and his SJW pandering, and Stein is simply a nut.", '>>{OPsyduck} : Maybe i should start shitposting too, money is always good!', '>>{jzpenny} : > You give Clinton far too much credit if you think she invented this concept. Responding to something I didn\'t say. Cool. >Are talking about the democratic party? Bernie Sanders ruined it by pandering to SJWs with pie in the sky proposals. This is exactly what I mean. We now have the Republican Party and the Really Republican Party. Now all of a sudden, Straussian "noble lies" aren\'t a ruination, being a warhawk isn\'t a ruination, they\'re legit. The ruination, says the establishmentarian, is trying to regulate Wall Street and stop the outrageous influence of money in politics. >He enraged the left wing OWS nuts. I think Hillary receiving $300,000 bribes for hour long speeches from Wall Street banks did that sufficiently without any involvement from Senator Sanders.', ">>{poop_gravy} : You can't make an argument, so you just accuse me of being a shill. What a cop out.", '>>{Disadvorange} : Because that has worked out so well for him this week, right?', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : Would be stupid not to have an online army. Bill had the MTV generation thing, Hilliary is going to have the online generation.', ">>{nerfAvari} : any press is good press headline after headline is dissing Trump is not a sign that he's losing. It actually aligns with the collusion between the DNC and the MSM to support Hillary so it's just business as usual", ">>{keldorr92} : Seriously. I could get paid for telling fucking idiots why they're so incredibly wrong? That's like my dream job.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : Hmm, what did you say then? Please clarify what I understood wrong. I meant that using the internet to manipulate opinion has been around for a long time. Using print, TV, and Radio (i.e. all media) in politics has been around for hundreds of years. You know that Bernie isn't a democrat right? He spent decades as an independent and then tried to hijack the party, during which he nearly tore it apart. The democratic party rejected the 'Bernie crowd' a long time ago. Remember 'the era of big goverment is over'? That was the most popular democrat in modern history. Stop the BS revisionism. Democrats are the center left party, and have been for decades, while Bernie is a far left independent.", '>>{Disadvorange} : The disconnect from reality there is staggering, honestly. "Any press is good press"? That good press this week has shown voters in every battleground state that the Cheeto Benito is unfit for dog catcher, let alone President, and that fact is born out by polls by every media outlet, liberal and conservative. But wow. Okay, man. You guys all have fun in that little world you all have set up over at T_D.', '>>{Streelydan} : I support Hillary because she is a better choice for president than Trump. I am not a shill, nobody pays me to be here. I think Trump is a disaster and will do what I can to make sure he never becomes president.', '>>{jzpenny} : > Hmm, what did you say then? Please clarify what I understood wrong. I don\'t think Kobe Bryant invented Wheaties, but having his image on the box helped ship a lot of units. In the same way, Hillary Clinton is the poster child and celebrity endorsement for gross political corruption and public exploitation. >You know that Bernie isn\'t a democrat right? Maybe this is a point where you and I differ. I care what someone stands for a whole lot more than I care about their political party, and especially these days, I couldn\'t blame anyone for not wanting to be affiliated with the DNC. >The democratic party rejected the \'Bernie crowd\' a long time ago. That\'s funny, Hillary sure doesn\'t make it sound like it these days. But hey we\'re out of the primary so I guess it\'s time for her supporters to drop the bullshit about how she\'s more liberal than Obama and help build that momentum for her "swing to the center", am I right? >Remember \'the era of big goverment is over\'? I can\'t believe you\'re echoing GOP talking points like this at me, all while supporting a candidate who is now promising national debt-free college tuition... amongst other issues, copped directly from the Sanders campaign, I might add. >That was the most popular democrat in modern history. JFK didn\'t say that.', '>>{Nicotine_patch} : Reddit is largely liberal and Trump is the worst candidate the republicans have ever had. Why is it so surprising the front page of /r/politics is so anti-trump?', ">>{Nicotine_patch} : Because trump didn't think of it first. If he had rolled out something similar to CTR they'd be lining up to suck his tiny, flaccid penis.", ">>{poop_gravy} : So you can't make an argument either. For the record, I abhor Clinton. I think she's a terrible candidate who has demonstrated a lot of poor judgement. However, I am not insane, so I recognize she is more qualified for the office than a bright orange man-baby with absolutely zero political experience who has repeatedly demonstrates he has no idea how he world works. So, with that out of the way, would either of you like to rebut the actual facts I posted, or are you going to continue putting your heads in the sand and pretending Trump isn't going to lose by Mondale-like proportions?", ">>{poop_gravy} : So you can't make an argument either. For the record, I abhor Clinton. I think she's a terrible candidate who has demonstrated a lot of poor judgement. However, I am not insane, so I recognize she is more qualified for the office than a bright orange man-baby with absolutely zero political experience who has repeatedly demonstrated he has no idea how he world works. So, with that out of the way, would either of you like to rebut the actual facts I posted, or are you going to continue putting your heads in the sand and pretending Trump isn't going to lose by Mondale-like proportions?", '>>{Hatewrecked} : Revolution Messaging, by their own admission, say they "nurture Sanders communities on Reddit and Facebook." And they\'ve spent much more cash than CTR. In terms of the outcome, what is the difference?', ">>{creejay} : Oh no haha. It's a career one does for passion, not money. Janice brings baked goods on Tuesdays, though, so there are some perks.", ">>{tau-lepton} : Here's a sign that he's losing, he's gone from tied to down 6.8 percent in ten days http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html", ">>{mr_fn_wonderful} : As soon as I saw the mullet was a fashion statement instead of part of the schtick I noped out. I've already been accused of being a plant so I may as well be paid.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : Classic Liberal being attacked for not being a new liberal and only having a single thought process. You gotta love the irony, classical liberals like you are rational creative thinkers. You see bullshit you call it. Don't change, I am more of a libertarian/conservative but we needed rational debates and compromises, it's not happening anymore.", ">>{Shasta-Daisies} : So much BS has and continues to be spewed about Clinton. I always thought she should do more to fight back. With all the junk postings I'm glad she has people correcting the record, if that is even true.", ">>{weasdgas} : > Correct The Record’s “Barrier Breakers” project admitted in a press release that it pays young people to pretend to be Hillary Clinton supporters, and claims that 5,000 unsuspecting social media users have already been “addressed” by the PAC’s mercenary social media warriors – with the promise that many more will be “corrected” in the near future. Lol. I'd love to see that press release. That sounds totally like a real, not-made-up press release.", ">>{other_suns} : Oh look, it's some blogspam regurgitating a 3 month old debunked press release.", '>>{Shasta-Daisies} : There are many people who like and support her, tbh. I think people are believing otherwise because it suits their own feelings.', ">>{Camoes} : Dude, he has clearly already made his point. You just can't understand it because you're (playing?) dumb.", ">>{jzpenny} : You're able to *see* peoples' motivation for their haircut? Through a YouTube upload of a video filmed in the early 1990s? Amazing. You should do an AMA. That, or... ya know... you're just full of shit and grasping for straws. But hey I'm an optimist.", '>>{OPsyduck} : But it also suits your own feeling that you refuse to believe that people are getting paid to do this. Do you also believe that the mainstream media is unbiased? Check that https://i.sli.mg/zDZrln.png', ">>{mr_fn_wonderful} : Pretty much I'm just that great. Self aggrandizement is all the vogue these days or perhaps you've missed the Trump campaign.", '>>{jzpenny} : All in all, I\'m just done with this notion that we need Straussian politicians to lie to us, spin us around about the world we live in, and manipulate us to support their ideas that we can\'t possibly understand precisely because they\'ve lied to us about everything. It\'s absurdity and a complete end-run around democracy from the get-go. And yet, that really is where we are. Today. You have people like the above poster, for whatever reason, standing here encouraging everyone to celebrate another annual "Purge"... of truth from media, of ethics from the concerns of the public consciousness, of our memory of responsibility as voting citizens in the most powerful nation the world has ever known. If the other side is allowed to make allusion to Hitler, then I feel justified in saying that this is a pattern we can see in history. Time and again we see it, at the dawn of a collapsing empire.', ">>{jzpenny} : But no, seriously, you're basically shitposting disses of a Carlin-level saint of the comedic arts. Go watch the video.", ">>{mr_fn_wonderful} : But no, seriously, *you* don't get it. Read my name.", ">>{Shasta-Daisies} : I don't mind if they are getting paid to correct the record. There is, as you say, bias everywhere. We all tend toward bias. You can't change it in others, but you can change it in yourself. So you can't sell me on anything. I'm not interested. I've read your posts.", ">>{jzpenny} : No, I get it. Now shut up about Hicks' hair and listen to his hilarious presentation.", ">>{OPsyduck} : > I don't mind if they are getting paid to correct the record. Why??? So you don't mind reading things that are not true/biased? How are you gonna know in the future if the information is real or just fabricated/twisted so that the image of the President is good?", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : No, Bill Clinton did. He would kick Bernie's ass in a democratic primary election. And how an earth is debt free college a Sander's position?! Your revisionism is ridiculous. He wanted free tuition, which is an entirely different thing. I don't believe taxpayers should be subsidizing upper middle class kids with rich parents. Clinton's is a solid center-left, i.e. sensible, position. More ideologically liberal than Obama? Probably not. But Obama's term, in practice, has not been very liberal, it's not hard to be more liberal than him. It's not just about 'these days', he has never been a democrat. He could have put in the hard work over the years like he did in Chicago, instead he spent his time in Vermont renaming post offices. Now that he is 80 and has nothing left to lose, he decided to put some skin in the game. He belongs in the green party.", ">>{Shasta-Daisies} : The idea behind it is to correct the BS, aka bias, as you say, kinda like what is being suggested by your bias. Frankly ive seen thisarticle reposted so many times its gotten just plain tiresome. I've already said I think it is a fine idea that Hillary has CTR folks correcting things if that is true, so you need not ask me the same questions again.", ">>{OPsyduck} : > CTR folks correcting things if that is true So how do you know if it's true? These organizations should NEVER exist for either party because it is absolutely bad trying change the story for their image.", '>>{jzpenny} : > He would kick Bernie\'s ass in a democratic primary election. Hahaha, well that\'s true. But then again, that\'s just because the DNC lets the Clintons cheat, and in fact it cheats on their behalf for them. So that\'s really not much in the way of bragging rights. >And how an earth is debt free college a Sander\'s position?! Your revisionism is ridiculous. He wanted free tuition, which is an entirely different thing. Yeah and Clinton wanted nothing. He negotiated that, even though its means tested and generally pretty shitty because it\'ll just be a handout to colleges in the way that Obamacare was to health insurers. >I don\'t believe taxpayers should be subsidizing upper middle class kids with rich parents. Oh? So you\'d support the removal of federal education funds from wealthy school districts? >It\'s not just about \'these days\', he has never been a democrat. I\'m totally uninterested in what you define as "being a democrat", if it\'s something significantly different than "sitting in the Senate and proposing, championing, and voting for progressive policies at every turn", which is what Sanders has been up to. I just don\'t care. I\'m not a Democrat because I want to be in a super special political gang sports team club. I\'m a Democrat because I want to enact progressive policies. The Democratic party is free to value that and court my vote, or it\'s free to fuck around and try to scheme and scam me I suppose, but then it loses my vote. Like it did this year. >Now that he is 80 and has nothing left to lose, he decided to put some skin in the game. He belongs in the green party. Sounds more to me like you (and your candidate) belong in the GOP, to me. Bernie was fighting *for reals* in the civil rights movement when Clinton was still a Goldwater girl. Heh.', ">>{Shasta-Daisies} : I don't care if it's true.I hope it is, but i doubt it because as someone else said, this article and issue is kinda old and the things you say have already been debunked, in the other spamlike reposts of this article. If there is a CTR, I would like nothing more than for them to perhaps get people to stop posting this silly article and sillier source. You can keep asking me the same question again which I've already answered several times now, but I'll just ignore it so you might want to expend your energies elsewhere.", ">>{OPsyduck} : > I don't care if it's true.I hope it is Well there you go, you are part of the problem! People just don't care anymore, they are going to believe what they wanna believe.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : The whole 'rigging' story is BS. Obviously the DNC is going to be biased against someone who wasn't a member of the party. Btw the 'definition' of a democrat is someone who is a member of the democratic party. Why is that so hard to understand? It's what the word means. Btw Bernie voted for Obamacare, which was not a very good bill, in my opinion. And yes, I would support the position that federal funds should be weighted towards poorer districts, although I'm not sure how the distribution is now. You think Clinton belongs in the GOP? Have you been watching the GOP? I don't get how people's thinking can be this skewed. And wow, what an idiotic comment. Bernie left Chicago and spent his life and career in one of the whitest states in the country. Literally, Vermont is around 96% white.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : When people ask how the Republicans got Trump. It's because People are sick of being used and lied to. Someone is going to probably say a bunch of BS about me mentioning him, but it's the same narrative. He is this and that. People are so programmed to follow a narrative, that they have lost the ability to see things for themselves. But it's so hard to decide what real and what's not. I am not trying to get you to vote for trump, I am just pointing out how he got to where he is. people are sick of the lies and deceit and just want honesty. The media needs an ethics committee or something, this journalism today is disgusting. The propaganda and bias is mind blowing. The NYT has gone from serious and insightful journalism, to well US Weekly politics edition.", ">>{Neglectful_Stranger} : Yeah, but you can make the money for two jobs while taking a dump at work. That's great income for the holiday season.", ">>{Neglectful_Stranger} : I'm just glad they quit talking about NAMBLA. That was annoying.", ">>{Disadvorange} : Sadly, the shoe is a bit small. I'm a 13E, that looks like a 10. Might fit Cheeto Benito, though. Small hands, small feet, right?", ">>{Aeverous} : Just because you and people on your facebook think Hillary is shit doesn't mean a majority of America does. Unless you're friends with 160 million Americans and they all replied to your strawpoll, lol", '>>{Aeverous} : Vote totals conveniently cropped there m8, could it be because those posts are from the new queue?', '>>{jzpenny} : I completely agree. One of the most unusual things about this election is how much it inverts so many long held assumptions. I\'d always conceptualized the Democratic party as the "change agent" party and the Republicans as the one dominated by the "establishment", yet in this cycle the Republican establishment proved responsive to their grassroots, while the Democratic establishment proved utterly unresponsive to, and indeed, collusive against, its own.', ">>{jzpenny} : > The whole 'rigging' story is BS. Obviously the DNC is going to be biased against someone who wasn't a member of the party. You clearly don't even know what you're talking about. The DNC's rules require impartiality towards all candidate in the DNC primary. That's what the DNC advertises to the Democratic voters who oversee their activities, and on that basis asks for voters trust. >Bernie voted for Obamacare, which was not a very good bill, in my opinion Obamacare was not that great, but the reasons why it wasn't so great are the same reasons why Hillary won't be a great leader - there was too much special interest influence on the bill. >You think Clinton belongs in the GOP? I think, outside of a few wedge issues, and without regard for the outlandish lies she is want to tell, she's basically indistinguishable from George W. Bush on ideology and most substantial policy. >Bernie left Chicago and spent his life and career in one of the whitest states in the country. So wait, living in Vermont makes you a racist? But campaigning for Barry Goldwater, who literally opposed the Civil Rights Act, that's your Democrat?", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : >The DNC's rules require impartiality towards all candidate in the DNC primary. Even with all the leaks, there is no indication that the DNC took any action against Bernie. Their statements were clearly biased, because they don't like a guy trying to hijack the party, but they didn't take any action against him. It was stupid, and they rightly lost the voters trust, which is why they are no longer in charge of the DNC. > but the reasons why it wasn't so great are the same reasons why Hillary won't be a great leader - there was too much special interest influence on the bill. That's a fair argument. But I have zero confidence that Bernie will be able to do anything against special interests. His own special interest groups will be just as damaging. I prefer lobbying from the private sector over lobbying from the public sector. The notion that we can end lobbying is a fairy tale, we have to work with what we have. >she's basically indistinguishable from George W. Bush on ideology and most substantial policy. Good lord, what an absurd comment. She is the exact opposite of GWB on the left-right divide. >So wait, living in Vermont makes you a racist? Is that what I said? He has zero credibility on anything to do with race or diversity given that he has lived in a homogenous community for decades. That doesn't mean he is a racist. BTW the Green party VP nominee thinks Bernie is a tool of white supremacists. Obviously I disagree, it just shows how messed up the far left is."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{tankguy41} : Sen. Marco Rubio says he was hacked by Russia during campaign, again 24 hours ago', '>>{FissureKing} : Is Rubio saying that the Trump Presidency is illegitimate?', ">>{HonoredPeople} : Russia wanted someone that was extremely friendly to Russian interests. Mostly because of the Oil sanctions that are currently in place on Russian directly. They really need to sell that Oil or else they are shit broke. Once Russia goes the way of Greece, old Putin might start looking to flee to Ecuadorian embassy with his pal Assange. Notation 1 - I don't like what Russia did, but I can understand the reasons why they did it. They don't have much of a choice.", '>>{_CtrlAltLeft_} : If I look at my server logs, I get tens of thousands of "hack" attempts every day. Bots scan IP addresses and try to use vulnerabilities to "hack" in. I get bot requests from China, Russia, France, Vietnam, India... literally all over the world. Considering that you can get a VPN for pennies on the dollar, the source could literally be from anywhere not necessarily those specific countries. This is gaslighting, fake news, alt-left propaganda.', ">>{Disco_Dhani} : Russia chose to annex Crimea in 2014, which is what resulted in crippling economic sanctions placed upon them by the West. Putin didn't have to do that, and instead of backing off, he decided to double down by waging information warfare against the West. Putin's actions are unsurprising, though, given: his only jobs in his entire life have been KGB spy and Russian President/Prime Minister; his 17-year history of dictatorship, murder, greed, corruption, and mass propaganda as Russia's leader; his unrelenting desire of conquest; his deep hatred or fear of the West and Western values like democracy; and his mission to renew the Russian Empire.", ">>{alkaraki} : So he says he got hack attempt. Which is really common as you said. But also its fake news because he didn't get a hack attack? Also what the hell is the alt left", ">>{HonoredPeople} : Yep. All of that is correct. Putin's only move was to destabilize the UN and America.", '>>{Quexana} : How far right must one be where Marco Rubio\'s words are deemed "alt-left" propaganda?', ">>{Angry_Comment_Bot} : Plus if Rus is a flea market they might sell some antiques from the 60's and 70's", '>>{d_mcc_x} : >Also what the hell is the alt left The new boogie man for the right.', ">>{pseudolocus} : I'm surprised there hasn't been some grand economic pact with China, tbh. But I'm also surprised at how far China has come around to building cleaner tech.", ">>{Corgy} : I agree that Putin's actions were atrocious, that he is a tyrant and an ulcer spreading against democracy - but when the Warsaw Pact and the USSR broke up, the Russians agreed to retreat in peace if Belarus and Ukraine stayed in their sphere of influence, acting as a buffer. So, when EU and NATO openly invited Ukraine to switch allegiance, they went against the spirit of the post cold war order. I concede that it's not fair to the Ukrainian people, but nevertheless it was foolish not to expect a violent Russian reaction. Saving face is of exceptional importance for a strongman..."], ['>>{beapop} : Clinton Campaign Admit They Pay An Army Of Online Trolls « SGTreport – The Corporate Propaganda Antidote', '>>{daveg243} : Of course they do. Noone is dumb enough to vote for a career criminal like Hillary.', '>>{beapop} : Sorry, should have found a Huffington post or CNN article.', '>>{wextippler} : A current majority of Americans are. Enjoy the suicide watch until November, the GOP is toasting itself.', '>>{baeb66} : Big government liberals and their expensive big government programs! Trump has an army of mouth breathing trolls that he pays nothing.', '>>{Disadvorange} : Both of those are better sources than somewhere that has an article titled, "The TRUE HISTORY of America’s FALSE FLAG WARS".', '>>{daveg243} : If by majority you mean basement dwellers and paid shills you are right. Going to enjoy swimming in your tears.', ">>{Disadvorange} : Mind if I save this, and then come back on November 10th to laugh at you like I'm Eric Cartman and you're Scott Tennerman?", ">>{Disadvorange} : Holy hell, that's an actual thing? That's almost as good as TimeCube.", ">>{vph} : They are recycling 3-month old news to attack Clinton now? That's pathetic.", '>>{chefbda} : So how much cheese pizza do you get From NAMBLA for posting the same stuff over and over???', '>>{hazenthephysicist} : Wait, I can get paid for trolling Trump supporters? Sign me up!', ">>{daveg243} : Its a deal. But only if you bring your swimmies. Don't want you drowning while I laugh.", '>>{Stellaaahhhh} : Serious question; how does one become a paid troll? Asking for a friend.', ">>{Stellaaahhhh} : Dang. That's pretty out in the open. I'm tempted, but they say turning a hobby into work takes all the joy out of it.", '>>{christopherNV} : As much as it takes, nom sayin, as much as it takes.', ">>{tau-lepton} : It's also been posted twenty times in the last two days.", ">>{Disadvorange} : This is gonna be fun. Just for giggles, do you have, like, *any* path he can take to get back that doesn't heavily rely on hoping for a Julian Assange hail mary?", '>>{Disadvorange} : Are you accusing me of being a CTR shill? Seriously?', '>>{jzpenny} : Thanks for helping to turn the greatest engine for human knowledge ever developed into a tool of opinion control for whoever has the most money to throw around. I\'m sure that will work out so well for your progressive values in the end. And also thanks for ruining my party and my country while you\'re at it. This sort of "era of the new low" is what Clinton sows, and what we\'ll reap on her behalf if the people of this country allow themselves to be manipulated by your shameful bullshit. Anyway, that was pretty harsh. So [I\'ll just leave this bit from my favorite comedian here to cheer you up](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tvp97SMZc6M).', ">>{OPsyduck} : I mean seriously, how can people think that everything is normal? Not a single anti-Hillary threads are getting to the front page anymore and YET people still dislike her as much. I know she has genuine voters, but there's absolutely people getting paid to do this.", ">>{Scoutster13} : Apparetly I'm one although until the other day I didn't even know what CTR meant. Funny, I have yet to receive a paycheck. I've been here mostly for entertainment purposes but if I can get paid too I'm down with that.", ">>{creejay} : Hi, I'm also interested. Can send me link?", '>>{daveg243} : You just trade your soul for 5 bucks an hour. Kinda like Hillary when she was young and needed the money.', ">>{sausage_ditka_bulls} : Yeah it's called marketing . This is shocking how exactly ?", ">>{poop_gravy} : I guess you haven't seen the poll lately. She is shellacking Trump. Many people said the Kahn thing was over the line and stopped supporting him. Even republican politicians and business figures have come out saying they're voting for Clinton. The tide changed. Trump lost.", '>>{Binturung} : And thus, why this sub has been a cesspool. At least I haven\'t seen any "very smart people said this ridiculous lie" posts today. So that\'s a start.', ">>{OPsyduck} : Can you read or you are also a shill? She might be leading in polls, but she's still disliked by a MAJORITY of people. So it's not normal to have nothing against Hillary on the front page for like 3-4 days now. If people liked her so much on this site, her subbreddit would be way bigger. Also your account is 3hrs old, so yea :)", ">>{jzpenny} : > I mean seriously, how can people think that everything is normal? They don't. Get away from the internet for a bit and talk to normal people. Everyone is freaked out and disgusted. All the moreso because they turn on the TV or radio (or, increasingly, popular venues of the internet) and now notice that it's just lying to them, hypnotizing them to forget about reality and believe in this fantasy world where Hillary Clinton is their heroic savior from Literally Hitler.", ">>{untildeath} : There's a dark side to it, though. You're also paid to muddy the waters regarding Hillary's corruption and you're also paid to sabotage actually goodhearted people like Sanders and Stein.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : >Thanks for helping to turn the greatest engine for human knowledge ever developed into a tool of opinion control You give Clinton far too much credit if you think she invented this concept. >And also thanks for ruining my party and my country while you're at it. Are talking about the democratic party? Bernie Sanders ruined it by pandering to SJWs with pie in the sky proposals. He enraged the left wing OWS nuts.", ">>{poop_gravy} : Yes, and Trump is disliked by an even larger margin, what's your point? Facts are facts. Your candidate is a huge loser and is going to lose by historical amounts.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : I've come around on political corruption over the last year. I now realize that corrupt insider politics is far better than an 'open' system, which gives us Trump (or Brexit, or Le Pen etc). I'll take the insiders over the insane. I was never a fan of Bernie and his SJW pandering, and Stein is simply a nut.", '>>{OPsyduck} : Maybe i should start shitposting too, money is always good!', '>>{jzpenny} : > You give Clinton far too much credit if you think she invented this concept. Responding to something I didn\'t say. Cool. >Are talking about the democratic party? Bernie Sanders ruined it by pandering to SJWs with pie in the sky proposals. This is exactly what I mean. We now have the Republican Party and the Really Republican Party. Now all of a sudden, Straussian "noble lies" aren\'t a ruination, being a warhawk isn\'t a ruination, they\'re legit. The ruination, says the establishmentarian, is trying to regulate Wall Street and stop the outrageous influence of money in politics. >He enraged the left wing OWS nuts. I think Hillary receiving $300,000 bribes for hour long speeches from Wall Street banks did that sufficiently without any involvement from Senator Sanders.', ">>{poop_gravy} : You can't make an argument, so you just accuse me of being a shill. What a cop out.", '>>{Disadvorange} : Because that has worked out so well for him this week, right?', '>>{DrunkenGenie} : Would be stupid not to have an online army. Bill had the MTV generation thing, Hilliary is going to have the online generation.', ">>{nerfAvari} : any press is good press headline after headline is dissing Trump is not a sign that he's losing. It actually aligns with the collusion between the DNC and the MSM to support Hillary so it's just business as usual", ">>{keldorr92} : Seriously. I could get paid for telling fucking idiots why they're so incredibly wrong? That's like my dream job.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : Hmm, what did you say then? Please clarify what I understood wrong. I meant that using the internet to manipulate opinion has been around for a long time. Using print, TV, and Radio (i.e. all media) in politics has been around for hundreds of years. You know that Bernie isn't a democrat right? He spent decades as an independent and then tried to hijack the party, during which he nearly tore it apart. The democratic party rejected the 'Bernie crowd' a long time ago. Remember 'the era of big goverment is over'? That was the most popular democrat in modern history. Stop the BS revisionism. Democrats are the center left party, and have been for decades, while Bernie is a far left independent.", '>>{Disadvorange} : The disconnect from reality there is staggering, honestly. "Any press is good press"? That good press this week has shown voters in every battleground state that the Cheeto Benito is unfit for dog catcher, let alone President, and that fact is born out by polls by every media outlet, liberal and conservative. But wow. Okay, man. You guys all have fun in that little world you all have set up over at T_D.', '>>{Streelydan} : I support Hillary because she is a better choice for president than Trump. I am not a shill, nobody pays me to be here. I think Trump is a disaster and will do what I can to make sure he never becomes president.', '>>{jzpenny} : > Hmm, what did you say then? Please clarify what I understood wrong. I don\'t think Kobe Bryant invented Wheaties, but having his image on the box helped ship a lot of units. In the same way, Hillary Clinton is the poster child and celebrity endorsement for gross political corruption and public exploitation. >You know that Bernie isn\'t a democrat right? Maybe this is a point where you and I differ. I care what someone stands for a whole lot more than I care about their political party, and especially these days, I couldn\'t blame anyone for not wanting to be affiliated with the DNC. >The democratic party rejected the \'Bernie crowd\' a long time ago. That\'s funny, Hillary sure doesn\'t make it sound like it these days. But hey we\'re out of the primary so I guess it\'s time for her supporters to drop the bullshit about how she\'s more liberal than Obama and help build that momentum for her "swing to the center", am I right? >Remember \'the era of big goverment is over\'? I can\'t believe you\'re echoing GOP talking points like this at me, all while supporting a candidate who is now promising national debt-free college tuition... amongst other issues, copped directly from the Sanders campaign, I might add. >That was the most popular democrat in modern history. JFK didn\'t say that.', '>>{Nicotine_patch} : Reddit is largely liberal and Trump is the worst candidate the republicans have ever had. Why is it so surprising the front page of /r/politics is so anti-trump?', ">>{Nicotine_patch} : Because trump didn't think of it first. If he had rolled out something similar to CTR they'd be lining up to suck his tiny, flaccid penis.", ">>{poop_gravy} : So you can't make an argument either. For the record, I abhor Clinton. I think she's a terrible candidate who has demonstrated a lot of poor judgement. However, I am not insane, so I recognize she is more qualified for the office than a bright orange man-baby with absolutely zero political experience who has repeatedly demonstrates he has no idea how he world works. So, with that out of the way, would either of you like to rebut the actual facts I posted, or are you going to continue putting your heads in the sand and pretending Trump isn't going to lose by Mondale-like proportions?", ">>{poop_gravy} : So you can't make an argument either. For the record, I abhor Clinton. I think she's a terrible candidate who has demonstrated a lot of poor judgement. However, I am not insane, so I recognize she is more qualified for the office than a bright orange man-baby with absolutely zero political experience who has repeatedly demonstrated he has no idea how he world works. So, with that out of the way, would either of you like to rebut the actual facts I posted, or are you going to continue putting your heads in the sand and pretending Trump isn't going to lose by Mondale-like proportions?", '>>{Hatewrecked} : Revolution Messaging, by their own admission, say they "nurture Sanders communities on Reddit and Facebook." And they\'ve spent much more cash than CTR. In terms of the outcome, what is the difference?', ">>{creejay} : Oh no haha. It's a career one does for passion, not money. Janice brings baked goods on Tuesdays, though, so there are some perks.", ">>{tau-lepton} : Here's a sign that he's losing, he's gone from tied to down 6.8 percent in ten days http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html", ">>{mr_fn_wonderful} : As soon as I saw the mullet was a fashion statement instead of part of the schtick I noped out. I've already been accused of being a plant so I may as well be paid.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : Classic Liberal being attacked for not being a new liberal and only having a single thought process. You gotta love the irony, classical liberals like you are rational creative thinkers. You see bullshit you call it. Don't change, I am more of a libertarian/conservative but we needed rational debates and compromises, it's not happening anymore.", ">>{Shasta-Daisies} : So much BS has and continues to be spewed about Clinton. I always thought she should do more to fight back. With all the junk postings I'm glad she has people correcting the record, if that is even true.", ">>{weasdgas} : > Correct The Record’s “Barrier Breakers” project admitted in a press release that it pays young people to pretend to be Hillary Clinton supporters, and claims that 5,000 unsuspecting social media users have already been “addressed” by the PAC’s mercenary social media warriors – with the promise that many more will be “corrected” in the near future. Lol. I'd love to see that press release. That sounds totally like a real, not-made-up press release.", ">>{other_suns} : Oh look, it's some blogspam regurgitating a 3 month old debunked press release.", '>>{Shasta-Daisies} : There are many people who like and support her, tbh. I think people are believing otherwise because it suits their own feelings.', ">>{Camoes} : Dude, he has clearly already made his point. You just can't understand it because you're (playing?) dumb.", ">>{jzpenny} : You're able to *see* peoples' motivation for their haircut? Through a YouTube upload of a video filmed in the early 1990s? Amazing. You should do an AMA. That, or... ya know... you're just full of shit and grasping for straws. But hey I'm an optimist.", '>>{OPsyduck} : But it also suits your own feeling that you refuse to believe that people are getting paid to do this. Do you also believe that the mainstream media is unbiased? Check that https://i.sli.mg/zDZrln.png', ">>{mr_fn_wonderful} : Pretty much I'm just that great. Self aggrandizement is all the vogue these days or perhaps you've missed the Trump campaign.", '>>{jzpenny} : All in all, I\'m just done with this notion that we need Straussian politicians to lie to us, spin us around about the world we live in, and manipulate us to support their ideas that we can\'t possibly understand precisely because they\'ve lied to us about everything. It\'s absurdity and a complete end-run around democracy from the get-go. And yet, that really is where we are. Today. You have people like the above poster, for whatever reason, standing here encouraging everyone to celebrate another annual "Purge"... of truth from media, of ethics from the concerns of the public consciousness, of our memory of responsibility as voting citizens in the most powerful nation the world has ever known. If the other side is allowed to make allusion to Hitler, then I feel justified in saying that this is a pattern we can see in history. Time and again we see it, at the dawn of a collapsing empire.', ">>{jzpenny} : But no, seriously, you're basically shitposting disses of a Carlin-level saint of the comedic arts. Go watch the video.", ">>{mr_fn_wonderful} : But no, seriously, *you* don't get it. Read my name.", ">>{Shasta-Daisies} : I don't mind if they are getting paid to correct the record. There is, as you say, bias everywhere. We all tend toward bias. You can't change it in others, but you can change it in yourself. So you can't sell me on anything. I'm not interested. I've read your posts.", ">>{jzpenny} : No, I get it. Now shut up about Hicks' hair and listen to his hilarious presentation.", ">>{OPsyduck} : > I don't mind if they are getting paid to correct the record. Why??? So you don't mind reading things that are not true/biased? How are you gonna know in the future if the information is real or just fabricated/twisted so that the image of the President is good?", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : No, Bill Clinton did. He would kick Bernie's ass in a democratic primary election. And how an earth is debt free college a Sander's position?! Your revisionism is ridiculous. He wanted free tuition, which is an entirely different thing. I don't believe taxpayers should be subsidizing upper middle class kids with rich parents. Clinton's is a solid center-left, i.e. sensible, position. More ideologically liberal than Obama? Probably not. But Obama's term, in practice, has not been very liberal, it's not hard to be more liberal than him. It's not just about 'these days', he has never been a democrat. He could have put in the hard work over the years like he did in Chicago, instead he spent his time in Vermont renaming post offices. Now that he is 80 and has nothing left to lose, he decided to put some skin in the game. He belongs in the green party.", ">>{Shasta-Daisies} : The idea behind it is to correct the BS, aka bias, as you say, kinda like what is being suggested by your bias. Frankly ive seen thisarticle reposted so many times its gotten just plain tiresome. I've already said I think it is a fine idea that Hillary has CTR folks correcting things if that is true, so you need not ask me the same questions again.", ">>{OPsyduck} : > CTR folks correcting things if that is true So how do you know if it's true? These organizations should NEVER exist for either party because it is absolutely bad trying change the story for their image.", '>>{jzpenny} : > He would kick Bernie\'s ass in a democratic primary election. Hahaha, well that\'s true. But then again, that\'s just because the DNC lets the Clintons cheat, and in fact it cheats on their behalf for them. So that\'s really not much in the way of bragging rights. >And how an earth is debt free college a Sander\'s position?! Your revisionism is ridiculous. He wanted free tuition, which is an entirely different thing. Yeah and Clinton wanted nothing. He negotiated that, even though its means tested and generally pretty shitty because it\'ll just be a handout to colleges in the way that Obamacare was to health insurers. >I don\'t believe taxpayers should be subsidizing upper middle class kids with rich parents. Oh? So you\'d support the removal of federal education funds from wealthy school districts? >It\'s not just about \'these days\', he has never been a democrat. I\'m totally uninterested in what you define as "being a democrat", if it\'s something significantly different than "sitting in the Senate and proposing, championing, and voting for progressive policies at every turn", which is what Sanders has been up to. I just don\'t care. I\'m not a Democrat because I want to be in a super special political gang sports team club. I\'m a Democrat because I want to enact progressive policies. The Democratic party is free to value that and court my vote, or it\'s free to fuck around and try to scheme and scam me I suppose, but then it loses my vote. Like it did this year. >Now that he is 80 and has nothing left to lose, he decided to put some skin in the game. He belongs in the green party. Sounds more to me like you (and your candidate) belong in the GOP, to me. Bernie was fighting *for reals* in the civil rights movement when Clinton was still a Goldwater girl. Heh.', ">>{Shasta-Daisies} : I don't care if it's true.I hope it is, but i doubt it because as someone else said, this article and issue is kinda old and the things you say have already been debunked, in the other spamlike reposts of this article. If there is a CTR, I would like nothing more than for them to perhaps get people to stop posting this silly article and sillier source. You can keep asking me the same question again which I've already answered several times now, but I'll just ignore it so you might want to expend your energies elsewhere.", ">>{OPsyduck} : > I don't care if it's true.I hope it is Well there you go, you are part of the problem! People just don't care anymore, they are going to believe what they wanna believe.", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : The whole 'rigging' story is BS. Obviously the DNC is going to be biased against someone who wasn't a member of the party. Btw the 'definition' of a democrat is someone who is a member of the democratic party. Why is that so hard to understand? It's what the word means. Btw Bernie voted for Obamacare, which was not a very good bill, in my opinion. And yes, I would support the position that federal funds should be weighted towards poorer districts, although I'm not sure how the distribution is now. You think Clinton belongs in the GOP? Have you been watching the GOP? I don't get how people's thinking can be this skewed. And wow, what an idiotic comment. Bernie left Chicago and spent his life and career in one of the whitest states in the country. Literally, Vermont is around 96% white.", ">>{Yolo20152016} : When people ask how the Republicans got Trump. It's because People are sick of being used and lied to. Someone is going to probably say a bunch of BS about me mentioning him, but it's the same narrative. He is this and that. People are so programmed to follow a narrative, that they have lost the ability to see things for themselves. But it's so hard to decide what real and what's not. I am not trying to get you to vote for trump, I am just pointing out how he got to where he is. people are sick of the lies and deceit and just want honesty. The media needs an ethics committee or something, this journalism today is disgusting. The propaganda and bias is mind blowing. The NYT has gone from serious and insightful journalism, to well US Weekly politics edition.", ">>{Neglectful_Stranger} : Yeah, but you can make the money for two jobs while taking a dump at work. That's great income for the holiday season.", ">>{Neglectful_Stranger} : I'm just glad they quit talking about NAMBLA. That was annoying.", ">>{Disadvorange} : Sadly, the shoe is a bit small. I'm a 13E, that looks like a 10. Might fit Cheeto Benito, though. Small hands, small feet, right?", ">>{Aeverous} : Just because you and people on your facebook think Hillary is shit doesn't mean a majority of America does. Unless you're friends with 160 million Americans and they all replied to your strawpoll, lol", '>>{Aeverous} : Vote totals conveniently cropped there m8, could it be because those posts are from the new queue?', '>>{jzpenny} : I completely agree. One of the most unusual things about this election is how much it inverts so many long held assumptions. I\'d always conceptualized the Democratic party as the "change agent" party and the Republicans as the one dominated by the "establishment", yet in this cycle the Republican establishment proved responsive to their grassroots, while the Democratic establishment proved utterly unresponsive to, and indeed, collusive against, its own.', ">>{jzpenny} : > The whole 'rigging' story is BS. Obviously the DNC is going to be biased against someone who wasn't a member of the party. You clearly don't even know what you're talking about. The DNC's rules require impartiality towards all candidate in the DNC primary. That's what the DNC advertises to the Democratic voters who oversee their activities, and on that basis asks for voters trust. >Bernie voted for Obamacare, which was not a very good bill, in my opinion Obamacare was not that great, but the reasons why it wasn't so great are the same reasons why Hillary won't be a great leader - there was too much special interest influence on the bill. >You think Clinton belongs in the GOP? I think, outside of a few wedge issues, and without regard for the outlandish lies she is want to tell, she's basically indistinguishable from George W. Bush on ideology and most substantial policy. >Bernie left Chicago and spent his life and career in one of the whitest states in the country. So wait, living in Vermont makes you a racist? But campaigning for Barry Goldwater, who literally opposed the Civil Rights Act, that's your Democrat?", ">>{hazenthephysicist} : >The DNC's rules require impartiality towards all candidate in the DNC primary. Even with all the leaks, there is no indication that the DNC took any action against Bernie. Their statements were clearly biased, because they don't like a guy trying to hijack the party, but they didn't take any action against him. It was stupid, and they rightly lost the voters trust, which is why they are no longer in charge of the DNC. > but the reasons why it wasn't so great are the same reasons why Hillary won't be a great leader - there was too much special interest influence on the bill. That's a fair argument. But I have zero confidence that Bernie will be able to do anything against special interests. His own special interest groups will be just as damaging. I prefer lobbying from the private sector over lobbying from the public sector. The notion that we can end lobbying is a fairy tale, we have to work with what we have. >she's basically indistinguishable from George W. Bush on ideology and most substantial policy. Good lord, what an absurd comment. She is the exact opposite of GWB on the left-right divide. >So wait, living in Vermont makes you a racist? Is that what I said? He has zero credibility on anything to do with race or diversity given that he has lived in a homogenous community for decades. That doesn't mean he is a racist. BTW the Green party VP nominee thinks Bernie is a tool of white supremacists. Obviously I disagree, it just shows how messed up the far left is."], [">>{DumpsterDon} : It's 2032. Trump is President. The SJW threat is overwhelming. How will he escape?", ">>{andyb5} : Don't worry, once he's inside the White House, he will be safe and secure even from nukes.", '>>{Neo2199} : Better call the Snake; come to think of it, maybe not.', '>>{lillyluminatus} : How about an international one of those? Escape him from the United States. Please!', ">>{CornCobbDouglas} : Don't take the tunnels. Getting stuck in them would take Stallone to get out of.", ">>{politicsacc87} : They wouldn't have to spend so much time on this if he and his family would just use the White House like a normal president", '>>{aledlewis} : I take it he ended term limits and clung to power using new executive powers and, presumably, a new doctor.', '>>{wyldcat} : [Don\'t be so sure of that:](http://edition.cnn.com/2016/12/22/politics/donald-trump-strengthen-expand-nuclear-capability/) > > In Moscow earlier Tuesday, Putin said in a defense speech that Russia needs to "enhance the combat capability of strategic nuclear forces, primarily by strengthening missile complexes that will be guaranteed to penetrate existing and future missile defense systems." > > Putin\'s remarks appeared to suggest that he was talking about new weapons systems that could overcome US missile defenses, a development that could force the US to respond. It was not clear, however, if he was contemplating an expansion in the total numbers of Russian weapons or of the stocks of those arms that are deployed.', '>>{wyldcat} : He could always go through the swampy sewers, he would fit right in there.', '>>{winstonknox96} : I know some guys up here that would love to see that bitch come up through here', '>>{solartai} : Nope, Doc is still with Trump. They get together each year to flip a coin and, in a bizarre play by statistics, it landed on heads every time. So Trump ended up staying healthy.', '>>{raynespark} : I want to see some kind of escape pod as used by Blofeld in Thunderball, or Dr. Evil in Austin Powers.'], ['>>{FockerCRNA} : I have a feeling that monetization of the presidency is the driving motivation behind this candidacy. Not saying they are unique, but a little more out in the open maybe.', ">>{mic9ael} : >likely the first time the daughter of a major party nominee has promoted a clothing line in conjunction with her father's presidential campaign. He's got the whole family scamming America", '>>{mrsuns10} : So any of you guys think I have a chance with her', '>>{thesmartfool} : ...aparently Hillary has to comfort herself in her prized looks to feel good about herself.', ">>{mwsomerset} : I wonder if Hillary will be getting a cut of all future jackets bought....didn't think so. Hillary is not running for president to make a buck nor is any member of her family trying to capitalize on it.", '>>{mic9ael} : One word: Deflect ^deflect ^^deflect ^^^deflect', ">>{mwsomerset} : Maybe you aren't...the millions of people this foundation helps appreciate it.", '>>{farcetragedy} : nah, probably more to do with increasing visibility of the Trump brand. and, of course, giving himself and his rich friends massive tax cuts.', '>>{farcetragedy} : you do understand the difference between a charity and a business, right?', '>>{breakTFoundation} : Thats what the op is muddy the waters. We know how the Clinton Machine is in bed with CNN.', ">>{farcetragedy} : Hilarious that they're fine with Trump taking money from the Saudis that goes right in his pocket and benefits him, but if the Clinton *charity* takes money from the Saudis that's used for *charity* and doesn't go in their pocket . . . IT'S A HUGE CONSPIRACY!!!!", ">>{breakTFoundation} : yes with a charity you have to give yourself payouts or cover your expenses and can't just do it in an instant", ">>{breakTFoundation} : Don't mention the leaks don't mention the leaks don't mention the leaks", '>>{mic9ael} : Deflect ^deflect ^^deflect ^^^deflect Try to stay on topic here - this is a thread about Ivanka whoring her clothing', '>>{Writerhaha} : Yes and so Eric and Donald Jr could get in for NY politics. The whole family has an angle.', ">>{farcetragedy} : what payouts? yes, charities have overhead. that's the way charities work. sorry.", ">>{redshirting} : Clinton supporters are gonna complain about tbs? Candidates using their campaigns to promote theit brand (ie Ben Carson) aren't uncommon. Including clinton herself ofc", ">>{Writerhaha} : I'm on Reddit between work hours on a Friday....of course I'm a damn billionaire!", '>>{Bobby_Marks2} : I had considered this. His candidacy has put three of his kids on the map, a big deal when you consider that only one of them is likely to run the family company from here on out. Watch them get their own TV shows, their own political campaigns, and their own celebrity status. This campaign took them from rich family to dynasty.', ">>{ZappaZoo} : I wonder if her line is made in China or Mexico like the old man's.", ">>{mwsomerset} : and they even paid her for speeches....who has ever heard of such a thing...politicians getting paid big bucks to speak. Reagan was paid 2 million dollars after he left office to speak in Japan. Seems there was some trade deals or something with Japan before he left office...can't recall the details. The man was in the beginning of Alzheimer's for goodness sakes.", '>>{Writerhaha} : Exactly. In five years the Trump family will be completely legitimate.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Reminds of the Kennedy family from decades ago. Kennedy's had their scandals and screw ups, but they served this country with distinction.", ">>{Plisskens_snake} : He's got like 10 trillion in tax cuts planned for his budget. More supply side nonsense. And said that if it didn't work out they'd look at cutting social security and medicare to shore up the difference.", '>>{Plisskens_snake} : No one cares about the leaks. Think one week news cycle.', '>>{farcetragedy} : yep. his platform is really not that different than any other R candidate from the last 35 years.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Must be a knockoff dress. Or she's posing.", '>>{Writerhaha} : Exactly. The only difference is it\'s a heck of a lot easier to be rich, shady, and have a "brand" then actually serve people. You don\'t seem to need that part now. I say with complete assurance that there will be a Kardashian/Jenner and Trump in elected office in my lifetime, and possibly multiple presidencies.', '>>{breakTFoundation} : >No one cares about the leaks. If the MSM was the sole arbiter of news not. The bernie sphere on social media is like an angry flock of brids chasing a predator.', '>>{mwsomerset} : They are very wealthy....They made a killing on their autobiographies and speaking fees. I might add they did not get rich until Bill left the presidency and wrote his book.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Nah. This is all Trumpsters pushing this rubbish. Sanders is off the board. There's no bottom with Trump. Look what he did to Ted Cruz's family. Classy. I expect he'll go full tabloid against Hillary. And if you like that kind of stuff then vote for him. Because that will be the content of his administration. Slime eight days a week straight out of our oval office.", '>>{Stuckinaloop} : Well at least she is only selling clothes and not political influence like HRC.', '>>{breakTFoundation} : Comparing Cruz to bernie supporters is silly. They gave this guy 220 million Dollar and they got conned.', '>>{farcetragedy} : > just for a quick penny. Or [7 billion.](http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/288648-trumps-family-would-get-a-71-billion-windfall-from-estate-tax-plan) but yes, i agree that power and attention are a huge part of the draw for Trump.', ">>{Plisskens_snake} : Keep spreading that bull shit. I'm sure it works for you.", '>>{mwsomerset} : Honey....if you think this is a new phenomenon ...politicians leaving office and making a buck...then you have not been paying attention. Remember Sarah Palin...quit her job ...tried to copyright her name...to make a buck...and she is still bilking rubes with her pac.', ">>{mwsomerset} : Honey is an endearment for both males and females...its as well. You might want to google Ms. Palin's skating rink scandal in Wasilla.", ">>{farcetragedy} : hold on, you're saying Trump lied about his net worth?", ">>{hotlikesauce27} : No, I'm not implying anything. The narrative for the last couple of months is he lied about his net worth. I guess we have to wait until he releases those tax returns"]]

classify and reply

['>>{IbanezDavy} : Why? By what area of thought other than illogical optimism, should we expect anything other than utter failure? His selection of Bannon, pretty much cemented that my expectations are rational.', '>>{-WhistleWhileYouLurk} : Serious question: Why would anybody want Cortana support? I spent a few hours on my PC just trying to turn it completely off. Is it useful on mobile?', ">>{TwoGee} : Staffers' secret work on immigration order rattles the Capitol", ">>{heuheu} : Yeah, I'm just waiting for the failure so I can laugh at his base. I can not wait to laugh at those rural people that think their factories are coming back. I can not wait to laugh at them as they suffer economic damage from an incompetent president. And the final cherry on top is going to be when Trump signs the TPP because he's a corporate republican that bamboozled a bunch of idiots.", '>>{TheClassyBum} : >It’s not clear why Apple is storing Safari data for so long, but it seems more of an oversight than anything else. Surely there could be no other reason.', '>>{IbanezDavy} : So that erases his rhetoric and should change my expectations? I mean there is nothing I can do about it, but I am still expecting complete and utter failure. Which seems like an attitude based in reality to me.', ">>{catpor} : Chelsea Clinton: Barron Trump deserves a chance to 'be a kid'", '>>{trump_burner} : If this goes unchecked the House is officially lost to Trumpism.', '>>{freshwordsalad} : Does, do they actually give a shit? Or will this just be business-as-usual in a Trump administration. Certainly seems like the GOP are being pretty quiet.', '>>{Kurses} : I read that as "Contra" for a second and got all excited. Not sure how I\'d be able to enter in the Konami code in one of these however.', '>>{sphks} : On mobile, it\'s the best thing ever. Like Google Now or Siri. Some use cases: Hey Cortana, go to home -> GPS navigation. Hey Cortana, go to the beach. (since I have "the beach" as a favourite place). Hey Cortana, go to Wallmart (looks for places called like that). Hey Cortana, when I am home, remind me to check my car. Hey Cortana, send a message to wife-name, I\'ll be at home in 5 minutes. I never ever type SMS now. I rarely add reminders by hand now.', ">>{RexUmbr4e} : Why the Hell is this Region locked. Me not Living in the US doesn't mean I don't want to use English voice apps.", ">>{NRG1975} : I concur with her. She was one of the most viciously attacked children of the modern political era. They should leave all the kids alone, as long as they are not involved in the political side of things. They don't deserve a board check, unless they are on the ice playing the game.", ">>{Sip_py} : I can't believe how spineless the GOP has become. Obviously ethics wasn't a focus of education while most Congressman where in school, but the blaten disregard for morality in the name of the party is disgusting.", ">>{Lost_Traveller_} : At this point he's just trying to calm everyone down. I think deep down he knows this will be a failed presidency, but he's doing his best to mitigate any panic that a lot of people already have.", '>>{dat529} : And the democrats are spineless as ever. Oh boy, Pelosi is going to "look into it".', '>>{Mister_Kurtz} : It’s not clear why Apple is storing Safari data for so long, but it seems more of an oversight than anything else. What’s most concerning isn’t that Apple’s keeping it, however, but that it isn’t encrypting it, which means it’s easily available with tools like Phone Breaker. Hmm, mr reporter, do you think maybe you could have asked an Apple representative rather than pulling a random thought from your head?', ">>{murloctadpole} : Same with a lot of microsoft apps. They also look like junk and crash often. I've given up on redmond.", '>>{canario1018} : Goodlatte also tried to gut the ethics committee as the first order of business in the new Congress. He is a career politician and a corporate shill for his district.', ">>{ScoopDat} : I'd rather ask why aren't users being prompted for this. Never mind. In the TOS there is possibly a clause that says they can do whatever they feel like unless it's illegal.", ">>{DarwinJones1} : I don't even use Cortana and never dream to have one.", ">>{Sip_py} : I'm sure there's plenty of people pissed but have to keep quite for the good of the party. The GOP is literally playing a game with the devil. They know with all the distractions and negative headlines the Whitehouse is pushing, they'll be able to slip in a bunch of wish-list legislative items under the radar. But they're risking the entirety of the Democratic process to let it happen. They're trying to look the other way long enough to get what they want, but not so long that Bannons white house fucks everything up. It's entertaining to watch, terrifying to live.", '>>{Sip_py} : Get pissed off and get involved in the local level', ">>{johnhenryirons} : Well this is Trump/Bannon's plan, right? Test the waters to see what they can get away with when it comes to checks and balances? Things like this, the DHS backing the immigration ban on its own without Trump having to prompt them, etc.", ">>{piedpipernyc} : At this point some of them HAVE to be complicit in this insanity. I'm still trying to wrap my head around it. The United States is in full control of a Christian Extremist group who favor patriarchy; (monarchy). Each group (Congress, POTUS) thinks they can use each other. We are going to chop the Constitution and American history in to small bits to assuage a God of fear. Choice is too much, too good for some people.", '>>{DoctorMarinus} : Yup. I gave Trump a chance and then he decided to bring on Bannon. chance blown.', '>>{ontopic} : Yeah, that way he can turn out good, like Eric and Don Jr.', '>>{fuuuuuckendoobs} : Exactly what I use Google now for.. so no need to change :) I do love voice commands - the rate of improvement over the last few years has been very impressive!!', ">>{EnkoNeko} : I've always found it a bit useless. If I want to do something on my phone, I'll do it. Also I feel a bit stupid saying my messages out loud", ">>{Reala27} : Donnie wouldn't stop short of attacking family. The fuck should we do it for?", '>>{CunningCrow} : Because we should aspire to be better people than him.', '>>{pm_me_ur_xmas_trees} : does this include private browsing? (asking for a friend)', ">>{Rdge} : Honestly Cortana sounds terrific, but not as long as it's powered by Bing. Every time I've tried searching for local businesses with it I never get any relevant results.", '>>{getridofappleskitle} : because if you hate him so much why would you want to be like him?', '>>{fuuuuuckendoobs} : It\'s perfect for when you\'re driving, or walking around. I can be like "OK Google, play music" or "OK Google, send a message to girlfriend, ask if she wants anything from the supermarket"', ">>{getridofappleskitle} : saying he's autistic because you hate his dad want make him actually autistic", ">>{LBJ20XX} : Are you listening, America. You've followed the lead of Obama and would have followed Hillary. They are telling you to give him a chance. If you were so willing to follow them all this way, why have you decided to stop following them now. Makes no sense to me.", ">>{OMGSPACERUSSIA} : I agree. Why focus on him when Trump's adult children are the real cause for concern?", '>>{Loxodontist} : Were you not the one who said that Donald Trump was the antithesis of American values? How can anyone be optimistic about a man like Trump becoming president?', ">>{sejuani_air_ult} : Obama wants to act like he's taking the high road and helping Trump along, but really he's just handing over more rope for Trump to hand himself with when things go balls-up. He knows Trump isn't going to listen to his advice or reconcile with minorities, so when things go bad everything Obama said will be used as a weapon against Trump. And it'll be entirely Trump's fault.", '>>{charging_bull} : I will show Donald Trump the same respect he has shown women, prisoners of war, Mexican immigrants and Musloms.', '>>{Reive} : Anyone know of "Phone Breaker" alternatives? Preferably free.', ">>{LBJ20XX} : So you'll listen to your leaders except when the times are toughest. Makes no sense.", '>>{ResonantCascade} : Honestly, this is just deflection bullshit so they can play the victim when the time comes.', ">>{Izor28} : I bet on election night you were waiting for that certain meltdown on the_donald too. It was just inevitable that it was going to happen because no expert could have seen him winning, and these are all reputable people! Trump has no chance at bringing factories back or causing anything but damage to these people, the same experts are saying. Looks like our corporate media has bamboozled a bunch of idiots into thinking he's done before he gets started. The final cherry on top will be when he wins reelection in 2020", '>>{007meow} : Chrome probably steals more of it and hands it away more easily', '>>{Monochronos} : Are you wanting to look yours up or something?', ">>{heuheu} : I love how Trump's base thinks the fundamentals of economics will change because he got elected. It's so adorable, you probably think free trade deals is why they left, don't you? Trump ran on economic illiteracy and magical thinking, and the population was stupid enough to vote for him. They deserve everything they get, and it won't be pretty. The guy is too stupid to stay off twitter and thinks he can live in the Trump tower still. You people voted for a learning disabled con man.", ">>{jc38122} : What rhetoric are you so worried about exactly? Every election loser spouts off some crazy stuff, but can't do much to back it up. Donald Trump won the election, and even Obama says we need to unite. People have every right to protest, but that will not change the outcome. I voted Obama twice, and people tried convincing me that I voted for the anti-christ. Now I voted Trump and I'm a racist bigot. If Trump falls flat, then we the people will vote him out in 4 years. Until then, people need to do what is best for our country, not just their select group. The division of this country needs to be mended, and people just don't seem willing enough to even try.", ">>{cabe565} : Well, that's news to me. Looks like we're screwed either way.", '>>{narse77} : All google services kept tons of data on you. Google is a advertising company. You are what they sell.', '>>{GoldenJoel} : I still love the, "Kid just wants to play Minecraft." Joke.', ">>{ReynardMiri} : Replace family with puppies and you have your answer. We're not refraining from attacking Barron as a favor to Donald, that's for sure.", '>>{BloodNGutz} : It was okay to attack the khans. The hell with the Trumps.', '>>{Reala27} : Good old fashioned revenge, and total destruction of our foes. Burn their crops, salt the earth, remove any evidence that they ever even existed.', '>>{mildweed} : Then Facebook should take down this "Government Official" Baron Trump page that is actively posting. https://www.facebook.com/Baron-Trump-1841728192709564/ And this fan club one that is actively posting (but looks not like a fan club, but a profile) https://www.facebook.com/Barontrump0/ Unless these really ARE him, then he has entered into the discussion willingly, and should be held accountable for what he says.', ">>{BloodNGutz} : That's some alternative realty shit right there. Too funny.", '>>{Raudskeggr} : Yeah, just wait till you hear about what chrome keeps... :p', ">>{Raudskeggr} : Google collects every tidbit of information they can about you and intends to keep it forever. If you're into googles ecosystem, chrome and gmail, mainly, then googles ai algorithms know a horrifying amount of info about you. By the time I found out I was in too deep. Then I just resigned myself to it. I for one welcome our new AI overlords.", '>>{FishDawgX} : Every online service stores all data about you forever. Why would it be any other way? For example, the Facebook posts you choose to delete say a lot about you and they are an important component of the newsfeed and advertising algorithms on Facebook.', '>>{onemadfool} : A report shared earlier today by Elcomsoft’s CEO Vladimir Katalov claimed your iCloud account may have been storing more Safari history than it should, pointing to a database of “deleted” browsing history that could be extracted in plain text to reveal URLs. But the data is outdated and we’ve learned from sources that the problem has been fixed for the majority of users for almost a year and for the rest quickly after the issue was discovered. https://9to5mac.com/2017/02/09/icloud-safari-ios-deleted-cleared-data-faq/ Apparently the issue has been fixed since 9.3.', ">>{FrederikTwn} : Private browsing just skips your phone and doesn't store anything locally. I'm pretty sure the same goes for those types of data.", ">>{SacredMopheadSweg} : You know the First Lady, who's also a mother, yanno taking care of her child until the end of the school year before she moves in with him? Yeah fuck the heartless trump family only attempting to give their kid a clean education why would they even bother trying to do that.", ">>{imliterallyfive} : Those pages don't even spell his name right... I'm pretty sure it's just someone weird using his name. Facebook is absolutely chock full of profiles like these. I wouldn't expect to see anything done about them.", ">>{Jack_Decker_CIA} : That's the compassion and open minedness that psychologically characterizes liberals!", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : The main problem I have is that it attacks an innocent kid, and makes those that do it look mean spirited. Not that Donald doesn't do the same thing, but it's also a part of why people dislike him.", ">>{kogashuko} : Ivanka's [story](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ivanka-lemonade-stand-trump-tower_us_583df339e4b0ae0e7cda76f3) about opening up a lemonade stand at their summer home whose only customers were bodyguards that felt bad for her, shows that this was never a possibility for Barron. The kid was being raised in a gold plated version of The Room long before Trump's move to the White House.", ">>{hamernaut} : In the thread about him yesterday all of the top comments agreed that he shouldn't be attacked for his father's political actions. I'm sure that T_D will spew endlessly about how liberals are attacking a kid, when in fact nearly all of us have shown that we are more civil than that. Just calling out their predictable lies before they can spew them.", ">>{Un-trollable} : Another reason I left Android. You can't do without GApps and Google play services.", '>>{hetellsitlikeitis} : His parents should resign and take him to toys r us, then. Fun for the whole family!', ">>{trek4} : > The hell with the Trumps. All but Barron. He's ten and he didn't ask for any of this. The Khans are adults who got in the debate on their own. Not that Trump's comments on them were acceptable, because they weren't.", ">>{trek4} : It seems that the denial about his autism that was issued in Melania's name is likely a lie, which would be a massive disservice to everyone involved. I suspect the denial came from Donald or was at least ordered by him. If they're lying about it, they're going to have to cover for the lie, which will be a massive amount of stress for Melania and won't help Barron when the truth comes out.", '>>{Rocket_Widget} : I feel like this is a major difference between Democrats and Republicans. When Barron is publicly made fun of, Democrats are quick to say "man, that was too far." When the Obama girls are called apes, Republicans go "Hahahahahahahaha!!!!! MAGA!!!!! Hahahahahahahaha!!!"', '>>{theumm} : Where can i see it? Ive been looking for this one porn vid that i saw last year', '>>{SinoScot} : > By the time I found out I was in too deep. **THEY KEEP PULLING ME BACK IN!**', '>>{Reive} : I wanna see if this is actually real. Seems kinda fishy to me.', ">>{ipad_kid} : > In the TOS there is possibly a clause that says they can do whatever they feel like unless it's illegal. That's exactly what a TOS is", ">>{MegaBigRoad} : What do you do that's so important in safari? And what would Apple do to benefit off of it?", '>>{BloodNGutz} : So Donald is a bad father for putting Barron though this. Got it.', '>>{higherlogic} : Top of my head, you search and post a lot about growing bud. Police have your phone and can see that you look at it...a lot. It\'s not like you\'re growing hydro/aeroponic lettuce or anything when they see search results for "how many grams in an ounce" or "how much yield for strain X using 12/12 and 24/0 grow cycle".', ">>{MegaBigRoad} : Oh in that case you have a point. I thought they were saying that Apple just had the data. Didn't know that others had it. (police etc)", ">>{naturesbfLoL} : Apple, Google, Facebook, etc all have to give data to the government sometimes. No, your local police doesnt. have it and the government doesn't care if you have a plant or two. It's a very small percentage of people that actually have their data sent to the govt (in the realm of .001%) The concern is if it gets to the point where it's pretty much a free for all", '>>{JohnDoeSmith12} : You mean like how Trump is doing now according to hysterical liberals? Good to know that you approve of his decisions.', '>>{DaShata} : It was patched in iOS 9.3.. The folks in this article are going off old information', '>>{kiarra33} : They take after thier leaders the GOP act in exactly the same way.', ">>{naturesbfLoL} : You shouldn't be being downvoted for ignorance, but really? You didn't know Google collects info? Google collects more information than any other corporation in the world, they are probably the biggest advertiser in the world. Facebook might come close to the amount they collect. I don't care about it a whole lot, I love Google and they don't sell information, but if you care about stuff like that you really should look into it. Use Firefox.", ">>{naturesbfLoL} : I'm waiting for Google to make a robot army to fight Samsung's military. We will have a true corporate war. Maybe they will have AIs resembling Marines from veteran's info", '>>{curiostoy} : I only use private mode for everything. Friends and families laughed at me. This is why i do it.', ">>{blacksoxing} : Guy at work didn't make a new profile and synced his personal email to his browser. Found out his personal habits the wrong way", '>>{Mister_Kurtz} : That line isn\'t in the article. The line actually reads "The company hasn’t made an official comment." I\'d prefer a journalist to not make stuff up on possible reasons.', '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : Let me guess. He spent a disgusting amount of time on reddit?', '>>{sobri909} : This reminds me of the time I had a mate staying at my place for a few days and he accidentally had his hard drive shared on the LAN. So I said "fuck it" and just went ahead and copied his entire porn folder without telling him. Some time later I realised that folder also included his personal homemade porn with his girlfriend. Obviously I forgot to mention to him that I had a copy of that stuff. Then years later he was crying about how he\'d lost all his personal porn because of a hard drive failure, and lost forever all the hot videos of his ex. At which point I told him that nope, they\'re definitely not lost forever. I believe his response was something along the lines of "omg awesome! send them to me, you evil thieving cunt".', '>>{sobri909} : > I\'d rather ask why aren\'t users being prompted for this. You can to opt in/out of this. It\'s listed as "Safari" in the iCloud settings. The reason why they do it is so that Safari on each of your devices can auto complete URLs and searches from your history. It\'s all stored securely in a way that\'s not accessible to anyone who doesn\'t have your iCloud login (eg even Apple themselves can\'t see it). iCloud tends to be one of the most secure cloud services. So even if they accidentally store something they shouldn\'t, it\'s typically only ever going to be accessible by you and no one else anyway.', '>>{theumm} : Oo man something like that happened to me too, i dropped my laptop and my hard drive got fucked, but i didnt had a guardian angel so i lost all my porn and other files :( i was going through puberty so i had a ton Youre a hero', ">>{7h3dud3} : Similar story here, except I encrypted a volume with AES256 and forgot the key. Sadly it had several videos and pictures of my then girlfriend, now wife. I've kept an image of the volume with hope that some day I might be able to crack it.", ">>{bumblebritches57} : Honestly, I don't think I would tell him, I'd feel like a fuckin weirdo tbh.", ">>{01011970} : > At which point I told him that nope, they're definitely not lost forever. ...just visit this pornhub link my friend", ">>{SimShade} : If you can't find it, that usually means the bitch ass uploader deleted it.", ">>{OkToBeTakei} : They explicitly state, all over the place, that they don't do that.", ">>{De5tr0yer} : I'm sure it's different for other people but I couldn't imagine in a million years having a legit and serious conversation about the porn we watched and/or downloaded. Guess I don't have any friends THAT close.", ">>{BorgDrone} : So basically the guy is the CEO of a software security company but he hasn't updated his phone's OS in over a year ?", '>>{303onrepeat} : Use ad block browser or Firefox focus if you want to do certain browsing.', ">>{ScoopDat} : >It's all stored securely in a way that's not accessible to anyone who doesn't have your iCloud login (e.g. even Apple themselves can't see it). We that last part isn't true because it's not encrypted.", ">>{yuhche} : If it's not important why do they collect it in the first place?", ">>{sobri909} : Uh, no. It is encrypted on iCloud, and the communication between your device and iCloud is also encrypted. Of course it's not encrypted anymore once your account has fetched it and your device wants to use it. If it continued to be encrypted once your device has received it, you couldn't actually *use* it.", ">>{ScoopDat} : Encrypted how? What encryption method/standard? Also some of that data can be huge like videos and whatnot, I don't see much delay when downloading the stuff, I doubt my phone or whatever is easily able to unencrypt such massive files and so on. See this is the problem with these closed source companies, everything is a trust game with these people.", ">>{sobri909} : If there's anything not to trust them on, it's not the absolute basics of encrypted online communications.", ">>{ScoopDat} : Why because of their recognition? If it was all that good and well, simple proof wouldn't be too hard.", ">>{sobri909} : You're talking about the absolute basics of encrypted communications. Look at the address field in your web browser, and note the `https`. This stuff is very old and well trodden paths, and your computer and smartphone and doing them constantly, for all sorts of things. Most online communications are encrypted these days, with unencrypted being the exception. Also Apple have repeatedly taken a pro privacy, pro encryption, pro security stance, even going to court with the US government over it. So yeah, there's no reason to doubt their adherence to the absolute basics.", ">>{ScoopDat} : Agreed on the https comments. Though the last paragraph is good to know, it contradicts itself when you realize Apple's involvement with the Prism program.", ">>{sobri909} : Which Apple have denied. And it's not even technically possible for the government to get access to an iCloud user's private containers. Apple themselves can't access them without the user's login credentials, and they have gone to extreme lengths to make sure that is the case.", ">>{ScoopDat} : That's great, but the thing is, none of this can be verified as the code isn't open sourced. Nor has anyone been invited for audits. I'm not saying they are dirty on all fronts, but only skeptical as I am with any sort of company that has closed sourced software as one of its main products.", ">>{sobri909} : They have talked at security conferences about some of their methods for ensuring as tight as possible security, right down to the hardware level. I don't have the time to find the link right now (I'm in the process of working on an app that stores and retrieves data from private iCloud CloudKit containers, coincidentally), but if you hunt around you can find the details.", ">>{ScoopDat} : They've also talked about adapting machine learning for Siri being local data from the user. Great if true, but like the hardware supporting hardware level encryption, I'd love to see it. Again also with details or preferably an audit if not schematics of the hardware/source code of the protocol actually being implemented."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{catpor} : Chelsea Clinton: Barron Trump deserves a chance to 'be a kid'", ">>{NRG1975} : I concur with her. She was one of the most viciously attacked children of the modern political era. They should leave all the kids alone, as long as they are not involved in the political side of things. They don't deserve a board check, unless they are on the ice playing the game.", '>>{ontopic} : Yeah, that way he can turn out good, like Eric and Don Jr.', ">>{Reala27} : Donnie wouldn't stop short of attacking family. The fuck should we do it for?", '>>{CunningCrow} : Because we should aspire to be better people than him.', '>>{getridofappleskitle} : because if you hate him so much why would you want to be like him?', ">>{getridofappleskitle} : saying he's autistic because you hate his dad want make him actually autistic", ">>{OMGSPACERUSSIA} : I agree. Why focus on him when Trump's adult children are the real cause for concern?", '>>{ResonantCascade} : Honestly, this is just deflection bullshit so they can play the victim when the time comes.', '>>{GoldenJoel} : I still love the, "Kid just wants to play Minecraft." Joke.', ">>{ReynardMiri} : Replace family with puppies and you have your answer. We're not refraining from attacking Barron as a favor to Donald, that's for sure.", '>>{BloodNGutz} : It was okay to attack the khans. The hell with the Trumps.', '>>{Reala27} : Good old fashioned revenge, and total destruction of our foes. Burn their crops, salt the earth, remove any evidence that they ever even existed.', '>>{mildweed} : Then Facebook should take down this "Government Official" Baron Trump page that is actively posting. https://www.facebook.com/Baron-Trump-1841728192709564/ And this fan club one that is actively posting (but looks not like a fan club, but a profile) https://www.facebook.com/Barontrump0/ Unless these really ARE him, then he has entered into the discussion willingly, and should be held accountable for what he says.', ">>{BloodNGutz} : That's some alternative realty shit right there. Too funny.", ">>{SacredMopheadSweg} : You know the First Lady, who's also a mother, yanno taking care of her child until the end of the school year before she moves in with him? Yeah fuck the heartless trump family only attempting to give their kid a clean education why would they even bother trying to do that.", ">>{imliterallyfive} : Those pages don't even spell his name right... I'm pretty sure it's just someone weird using his name. Facebook is absolutely chock full of profiles like these. I wouldn't expect to see anything done about them.", ">>{Jack_Decker_CIA} : That's the compassion and open minedness that psychologically characterizes liberals!", ">>{Donald_J_Putin} : The main problem I have is that it attacks an innocent kid, and makes those that do it look mean spirited. Not that Donald doesn't do the same thing, but it's also a part of why people dislike him.", ">>{kogashuko} : Ivanka's [story](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ivanka-lemonade-stand-trump-tower_us_583df339e4b0ae0e7cda76f3) about opening up a lemonade stand at their summer home whose only customers were bodyguards that felt bad for her, shows that this was never a possibility for Barron. The kid was being raised in a gold plated version of The Room long before Trump's move to the White House.", ">>{hamernaut} : In the thread about him yesterday all of the top comments agreed that he shouldn't be attacked for his father's political actions. I'm sure that T_D will spew endlessly about how liberals are attacking a kid, when in fact nearly all of us have shown that we are more civil than that. Just calling out their predictable lies before they can spew them.", '>>{hetellsitlikeitis} : His parents should resign and take him to toys r us, then. Fun for the whole family!', ">>{trek4} : > The hell with the Trumps. All but Barron. He's ten and he didn't ask for any of this. The Khans are adults who got in the debate on their own. Not that Trump's comments on them were acceptable, because they weren't.", ">>{trek4} : It seems that the denial about his autism that was issued in Melania's name is likely a lie, which would be a massive disservice to everyone involved. I suspect the denial came from Donald or was at least ordered by him. If they're lying about it, they're going to have to cover for the lie, which will be a massive amount of stress for Melania and won't help Barron when the truth comes out.", '>>{Rocket_Widget} : I feel like this is a major difference between Democrats and Republicans. When Barron is publicly made fun of, Democrats are quick to say "man, that was too far." When the Obama girls are called apes, Republicans go "Hahahahahahahaha!!!!! MAGA!!!!! Hahahahahahahaha!!!"', '>>{BloodNGutz} : So Donald is a bad father for putting Barron though this. Got it.', '>>{JohnDoeSmith12} : You mean like how Trump is doing now according to hysterical liberals? Good to know that you approve of his decisions.', '>>{kiarra33} : They take after thier leaders the GOP act in exactly the same way.'], ['>>{-WhistleWhileYouLurk} : Serious question: Why would anybody want Cortana support? I spent a few hours on my PC just trying to turn it completely off. Is it useful on mobile?', '>>{Kurses} : I read that as "Contra" for a second and got all excited. Not sure how I\'d be able to enter in the Konami code in one of these however.', '>>{sphks} : On mobile, it\'s the best thing ever. Like Google Now or Siri. Some use cases: Hey Cortana, go to home -> GPS navigation. Hey Cortana, go to the beach. (since I have "the beach" as a favourite place). Hey Cortana, go to Wallmart (looks for places called like that). Hey Cortana, when I am home, remind me to check my car. Hey Cortana, send a message to wife-name, I\'ll be at home in 5 minutes. I never ever type SMS now. I rarely add reminders by hand now.', ">>{RexUmbr4e} : Why the Hell is this Region locked. Me not Living in the US doesn't mean I don't want to use English voice apps.", ">>{murloctadpole} : Same with a lot of microsoft apps. They also look like junk and crash often. I've given up on redmond.", ">>{DarwinJones1} : I don't even use Cortana and never dream to have one.", '>>{fuuuuuckendoobs} : Exactly what I use Google now for.. so no need to change :) I do love voice commands - the rate of improvement over the last few years has been very impressive!!', ">>{EnkoNeko} : I've always found it a bit useless. If I want to do something on my phone, I'll do it. Also I feel a bit stupid saying my messages out loud", ">>{Rdge} : Honestly Cortana sounds terrific, but not as long as it's powered by Bing. Every time I've tried searching for local businesses with it I never get any relevant results.", '>>{fuuuuuckendoobs} : It\'s perfect for when you\'re driving, or walking around. I can be like "OK Google, play music" or "OK Google, send a message to girlfriend, ask if she wants anything from the supermarket"'], ['>>{IbanezDavy} : Why? By what area of thought other than illogical optimism, should we expect anything other than utter failure? His selection of Bannon, pretty much cemented that my expectations are rational.', ">>{heuheu} : Yeah, I'm just waiting for the failure so I can laugh at his base. I can not wait to laugh at those rural people that think their factories are coming back. I can not wait to laugh at them as they suffer economic damage from an incompetent president. And the final cherry on top is going to be when Trump signs the TPP because he's a corporate republican that bamboozled a bunch of idiots.", '>>{IbanezDavy} : So that erases his rhetoric and should change my expectations? I mean there is nothing I can do about it, but I am still expecting complete and utter failure. Which seems like an attitude based in reality to me.', ">>{Lost_Traveller_} : At this point he's just trying to calm everyone down. I think deep down he knows this will be a failed presidency, but he's doing his best to mitigate any panic that a lot of people already have.", '>>{DoctorMarinus} : Yup. I gave Trump a chance and then he decided to bring on Bannon. chance blown.', ">>{LBJ20XX} : Are you listening, America. You've followed the lead of Obama and would have followed Hillary. They are telling you to give him a chance. If you were so willing to follow them all this way, why have you decided to stop following them now. Makes no sense to me.", '>>{Loxodontist} : Were you not the one who said that Donald Trump was the antithesis of American values? How can anyone be optimistic about a man like Trump becoming president?', ">>{sejuani_air_ult} : Obama wants to act like he's taking the high road and helping Trump along, but really he's just handing over more rope for Trump to hand himself with when things go balls-up. He knows Trump isn't going to listen to his advice or reconcile with minorities, so when things go bad everything Obama said will be used as a weapon against Trump. And it'll be entirely Trump's fault.", '>>{charging_bull} : I will show Donald Trump the same respect he has shown women, prisoners of war, Mexican immigrants and Musloms.', ">>{LBJ20XX} : So you'll listen to your leaders except when the times are toughest. Makes no sense.", ">>{Izor28} : I bet on election night you were waiting for that certain meltdown on the_donald too. It was just inevitable that it was going to happen because no expert could have seen him winning, and these are all reputable people! Trump has no chance at bringing factories back or causing anything but damage to these people, the same experts are saying. Looks like our corporate media has bamboozled a bunch of idiots into thinking he's done before he gets started. The final cherry on top will be when he wins reelection in 2020", ">>{heuheu} : I love how Trump's base thinks the fundamentals of economics will change because he got elected. It's so adorable, you probably think free trade deals is why they left, don't you? Trump ran on economic illiteracy and magical thinking, and the population was stupid enough to vote for him. They deserve everything they get, and it won't be pretty. The guy is too stupid to stay off twitter and thinks he can live in the Trump tower still. You people voted for a learning disabled con man.", ">>{jc38122} : What rhetoric are you so worried about exactly? Every election loser spouts off some crazy stuff, but can't do much to back it up. Donald Trump won the election, and even Obama says we need to unite. People have every right to protest, but that will not change the outcome. I voted Obama twice, and people tried convincing me that I voted for the anti-christ. Now I voted Trump and I'm a racist bigot. If Trump falls flat, then we the people will vote him out in 4 years. Until then, people need to do what is best for our country, not just their select group. The division of this country needs to be mended, and people just don't seem willing enough to even try."], ['>>{TheClassyBum} : >It’s not clear why Apple is storing Safari data for so long, but it seems more of an oversight than anything else. Surely there could be no other reason.', '>>{Mister_Kurtz} : It’s not clear why Apple is storing Safari data for so long, but it seems more of an oversight than anything else. What’s most concerning isn’t that Apple’s keeping it, however, but that it isn’t encrypting it, which means it’s easily available with tools like Phone Breaker. Hmm, mr reporter, do you think maybe you could have asked an Apple representative rather than pulling a random thought from your head?', ">>{ScoopDat} : I'd rather ask why aren't users being prompted for this. Never mind. In the TOS there is possibly a clause that says they can do whatever they feel like unless it's illegal.", '>>{pm_me_ur_xmas_trees} : does this include private browsing? (asking for a friend)', '>>{Reive} : Anyone know of "Phone Breaker" alternatives? Preferably free.', '>>{007meow} : Chrome probably steals more of it and hands it away more easily', '>>{Monochronos} : Are you wanting to look yours up or something?', ">>{cabe565} : Well, that's news to me. Looks like we're screwed either way.", '>>{narse77} : All google services kept tons of data on you. Google is a advertising company. You are what they sell.', '>>{Raudskeggr} : Yeah, just wait till you hear about what chrome keeps... :p', ">>{Raudskeggr} : Google collects every tidbit of information they can about you and intends to keep it forever. If you're into googles ecosystem, chrome and gmail, mainly, then googles ai algorithms know a horrifying amount of info about you. By the time I found out I was in too deep. Then I just resigned myself to it. I for one welcome our new AI overlords.", '>>{FishDawgX} : Every online service stores all data about you forever. Why would it be any other way? For example, the Facebook posts you choose to delete say a lot about you and they are an important component of the newsfeed and advertising algorithms on Facebook.', '>>{onemadfool} : A report shared earlier today by Elcomsoft’s CEO Vladimir Katalov claimed your iCloud account may have been storing more Safari history than it should, pointing to a database of “deleted” browsing history that could be extracted in plain text to reveal URLs. But the data is outdated and we’ve learned from sources that the problem has been fixed for the majority of users for almost a year and for the rest quickly after the issue was discovered. https://9to5mac.com/2017/02/09/icloud-safari-ios-deleted-cleared-data-faq/ Apparently the issue has been fixed since 9.3.', ">>{FrederikTwn} : Private browsing just skips your phone and doesn't store anything locally. I'm pretty sure the same goes for those types of data.", ">>{Un-trollable} : Another reason I left Android. You can't do without GApps and Google play services.", '>>{theumm} : Where can i see it? Ive been looking for this one porn vid that i saw last year', '>>{SinoScot} : > By the time I found out I was in too deep. **THEY KEEP PULLING ME BACK IN!**', '>>{Reive} : I wanna see if this is actually real. Seems kinda fishy to me.', ">>{ipad_kid} : > In the TOS there is possibly a clause that says they can do whatever they feel like unless it's illegal. That's exactly what a TOS is", ">>{MegaBigRoad} : What do you do that's so important in safari? And what would Apple do to benefit off of it?", '>>{higherlogic} : Top of my head, you search and post a lot about growing bud. Police have your phone and can see that you look at it...a lot. It\'s not like you\'re growing hydro/aeroponic lettuce or anything when they see search results for "how many grams in an ounce" or "how much yield for strain X using 12/12 and 24/0 grow cycle".', ">>{MegaBigRoad} : Oh in that case you have a point. I thought they were saying that Apple just had the data. Didn't know that others had it. (police etc)", ">>{naturesbfLoL} : Apple, Google, Facebook, etc all have to give data to the government sometimes. No, your local police doesnt. have it and the government doesn't care if you have a plant or two. It's a very small percentage of people that actually have their data sent to the govt (in the realm of .001%) The concern is if it gets to the point where it's pretty much a free for all", '>>{DaShata} : It was patched in iOS 9.3.. The folks in this article are going off old information', ">>{naturesbfLoL} : You shouldn't be being downvoted for ignorance, but really? You didn't know Google collects info? Google collects more information than any other corporation in the world, they are probably the biggest advertiser in the world. Facebook might come close to the amount they collect. I don't care about it a whole lot, I love Google and they don't sell information, but if you care about stuff like that you really should look into it. Use Firefox.", ">>{naturesbfLoL} : I'm waiting for Google to make a robot army to fight Samsung's military. We will have a true corporate war. Maybe they will have AIs resembling Marines from veteran's info", '>>{curiostoy} : I only use private mode for everything. Friends and families laughed at me. This is why i do it.', ">>{blacksoxing} : Guy at work didn't make a new profile and synced his personal email to his browser. Found out his personal habits the wrong way", '>>{Mister_Kurtz} : That line isn\'t in the article. The line actually reads "The company hasn’t made an official comment." I\'d prefer a journalist to not make stuff up on possible reasons.', '>>{PavelDatsyuk} : Let me guess. He spent a disgusting amount of time on reddit?', '>>{sobri909} : This reminds me of the time I had a mate staying at my place for a few days and he accidentally had his hard drive shared on the LAN. So I said "fuck it" and just went ahead and copied his entire porn folder without telling him. Some time later I realised that folder also included his personal homemade porn with his girlfriend. Obviously I forgot to mention to him that I had a copy of that stuff. Then years later he was crying about how he\'d lost all his personal porn because of a hard drive failure, and lost forever all the hot videos of his ex. At which point I told him that nope, they\'re definitely not lost forever. I believe his response was something along the lines of "omg awesome! send them to me, you evil thieving cunt".', '>>{sobri909} : > I\'d rather ask why aren\'t users being prompted for this. You can to opt in/out of this. It\'s listed as "Safari" in the iCloud settings. The reason why they do it is so that Safari on each of your devices can auto complete URLs and searches from your history. It\'s all stored securely in a way that\'s not accessible to anyone who doesn\'t have your iCloud login (eg even Apple themselves can\'t see it). iCloud tends to be one of the most secure cloud services. So even if they accidentally store something they shouldn\'t, it\'s typically only ever going to be accessible by you and no one else anyway.', '>>{theumm} : Oo man something like that happened to me too, i dropped my laptop and my hard drive got fucked, but i didnt had a guardian angel so i lost all my porn and other files :( i was going through puberty so i had a ton Youre a hero', ">>{7h3dud3} : Similar story here, except I encrypted a volume with AES256 and forgot the key. Sadly it had several videos and pictures of my then girlfriend, now wife. I've kept an image of the volume with hope that some day I might be able to crack it.", ">>{bumblebritches57} : Honestly, I don't think I would tell him, I'd feel like a fuckin weirdo tbh.", ">>{01011970} : > At which point I told him that nope, they're definitely not lost forever. ...just visit this pornhub link my friend", ">>{SimShade} : If you can't find it, that usually means the bitch ass uploader deleted it.", ">>{OkToBeTakei} : They explicitly state, all over the place, that they don't do that.", ">>{De5tr0yer} : I'm sure it's different for other people but I couldn't imagine in a million years having a legit and serious conversation about the porn we watched and/or downloaded. Guess I don't have any friends THAT close.", ">>{BorgDrone} : So basically the guy is the CEO of a software security company but he hasn't updated his phone's OS in over a year ?", '>>{303onrepeat} : Use ad block browser or Firefox focus if you want to do certain browsing.', ">>{ScoopDat} : >It's all stored securely in a way that's not accessible to anyone who doesn't have your iCloud login (e.g. even Apple themselves can't see it). We that last part isn't true because it's not encrypted.", ">>{yuhche} : If it's not important why do they collect it in the first place?", ">>{sobri909} : Uh, no. It is encrypted on iCloud, and the communication between your device and iCloud is also encrypted. Of course it's not encrypted anymore once your account has fetched it and your device wants to use it. If it continued to be encrypted once your device has received it, you couldn't actually *use* it.", ">>{ScoopDat} : Encrypted how? What encryption method/standard? Also some of that data can be huge like videos and whatnot, I don't see much delay when downloading the stuff, I doubt my phone or whatever is easily able to unencrypt such massive files and so on. See this is the problem with these closed source companies, everything is a trust game with these people.", ">>{sobri909} : If there's anything not to trust them on, it's not the absolute basics of encrypted online communications.", ">>{ScoopDat} : Why because of their recognition? If it was all that good and well, simple proof wouldn't be too hard.", ">>{sobri909} : You're talking about the absolute basics of encrypted communications. Look at the address field in your web browser, and note the `https`. This stuff is very old and well trodden paths, and your computer and smartphone and doing them constantly, for all sorts of things. Most online communications are encrypted these days, with unencrypted being the exception. Also Apple have repeatedly taken a pro privacy, pro encryption, pro security stance, even going to court with the US government over it. So yeah, there's no reason to doubt their adherence to the absolute basics.", ">>{ScoopDat} : Agreed on the https comments. Though the last paragraph is good to know, it contradicts itself when you realize Apple's involvement with the Prism program.", ">>{sobri909} : Which Apple have denied. And it's not even technically possible for the government to get access to an iCloud user's private containers. Apple themselves can't access them without the user's login credentials, and they have gone to extreme lengths to make sure that is the case.", ">>{ScoopDat} : That's great, but the thing is, none of this can be verified as the code isn't open sourced. Nor has anyone been invited for audits. I'm not saying they are dirty on all fronts, but only skeptical as I am with any sort of company that has closed sourced software as one of its main products.", ">>{sobri909} : They have talked at security conferences about some of their methods for ensuring as tight as possible security, right down to the hardware level. I don't have the time to find the link right now (I'm in the process of working on an app that stores and retrieves data from private iCloud CloudKit containers, coincidentally), but if you hunt around you can find the details.", ">>{ScoopDat} : They've also talked about adapting machine learning for Siri being local data from the user. Great if true, but like the hardware supporting hardware level encryption, I'd love to see it. Again also with details or preferably an audit if not schematics of the hardware/source code of the protocol actually being implemented."], [">>{TwoGee} : Staffers' secret work on immigration order rattles the Capitol", '>>{trump_burner} : If this goes unchecked the House is officially lost to Trumpism.', '>>{freshwordsalad} : Does, do they actually give a shit? Or will this just be business-as-usual in a Trump administration. Certainly seems like the GOP are being pretty quiet.', ">>{Sip_py} : I can't believe how spineless the GOP has become. Obviously ethics wasn't a focus of education while most Congressman where in school, but the blaten disregard for morality in the name of the party is disgusting.", '>>{dat529} : And the democrats are spineless as ever. Oh boy, Pelosi is going to "look into it".', '>>{canario1018} : Goodlatte also tried to gut the ethics committee as the first order of business in the new Congress. He is a career politician and a corporate shill for his district.', ">>{Sip_py} : I'm sure there's plenty of people pissed but have to keep quite for the good of the party. The GOP is literally playing a game with the devil. They know with all the distractions and negative headlines the Whitehouse is pushing, they'll be able to slip in a bunch of wish-list legislative items under the radar. But they're risking the entirety of the Democratic process to let it happen. They're trying to look the other way long enough to get what they want, but not so long that Bannons white house fucks everything up. It's entertaining to watch, terrifying to live.", '>>{Sip_py} : Get pissed off and get involved in the local level', ">>{johnhenryirons} : Well this is Trump/Bannon's plan, right? Test the waters to see what they can get away with when it comes to checks and balances? Things like this, the DHS backing the immigration ban on its own without Trump having to prompt them, etc.", ">>{piedpipernyc} : At this point some of them HAVE to be complicit in this insanity. I'm still trying to wrap my head around it. The United States is in full control of a Christian Extremist group who favor patriarchy; (monarchy). Each group (Congress, POTUS) thinks they can use each other. We are going to chop the Constitution and American history in to small bits to assuage a God of fear. Choice is too much, too good for some people."]]

classify and reply

[">>{AbdurRazzaqSindhu} : Message missing from Clinton's submitted emails, State Dept. confirms", '>>{NebraskaGunOwner} : So the argument is now that these emails "weren\'t in her possession". How is that possible unless she deleted them? How can they retrieve them from Huma but not Clinton if they shared the same server? And why is it that the only missing emails so far have directly related to her use of the server. What else did they delete?', '>>{proggieus} : well there is still the matter of the 9 complete and 5 partial(if memory serves) missing from the Blumenthal release to the committee', '>>{green_euphoria} : Didn\'t they try to claim she had no emails with him at all? That they\'re all "missing" despite him setting up and maintaining her server for years?', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : Hillary is often blamed for acts *Other Hillary* commits.', ">>{Politx} : It's bullshit that she deleted 32000 emails without turning them in based on her own criteria for disclosing them. How stupid does she think people are.", ">>{Politx} : Because she broke the law and isn't being held accountable", '>>{proggieus} : Blumenthal was her private analyst that was barred from working at the state department by the Obama administration, so she hired and paid him out of the clinton foundation. his email account was the one hacked by guccifer but he had nothing to do with her server other then being a recipient /sender over it.', '>>{green_euphoria} : Thanks. So who is the one where all emails are "lost"', ">>{thewhitedeath} : THIS IS HUGE! This is the one that'll bring her down. Hillary is fucked now! Nothing is going to happen.", '>>{proggieus} : Brian Pagliano- the guy who plead the fifth and didn\'t answer a single question in the Judicial Watch deposition. Edit to add- He is fucked by the way, his immunity is the "use" variety which means they can\'t use any evidence against him that comes directly from his testimony or interviews but any evidence gathered from an outside source is fair game and he can be prosecuted. [if this report is true](http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/emails-found-hillary-clintons-senior-staffer-state-department/story?id=38989504) he is a going to be prosecuted unless they re negotiate his immunity deal for him to testify in a criminal proceeding', ">>{dtietje} : I wish these would stop popping up every five minutes. I'd like to see Hillary rot in prison for being a crooked piece of shit as much as the next guy, but this isn't anything substantial.", '>>{androidpk} : The feds already got their use out of Pagliano, there will be no renegotiating. As you said, he is fucked.', '>>{sotech} : It just goes on and on, my friends.', ">>{green_euphoria} : Thanks. I really do follow this stuff extremely closely but it's nice to have a reference considering I'm getting huge players confused", '>>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : So, you support a royal class that is above the law? Good to know.', ">>{thewhitedeath} : I want her to go straight to fucking jail. It's just not going to happen.", '>>{Betterwithcheddar} : Apparently they are stupid enough to ignore it and vote for her. Supposedly vote for her.', '>>{Number1ricky} : whats the odds that somebody working for her will just take the fall for her? Is that situation even viable?', '>>{mostclever_184} : Her supporters keep asking "where\'s the proof?". Wellllll, here\'s proof', '>>{proggieus} : hard for somebody to take the fall for a server she paid for, that was located in her home. Not to mention that many of legal responsibilities she is responsible for came either by the appointment to the job or forms she signed in accepting the job- such as the classified information being marked or unmarked form she signed.', ">>{dtietje} : Yes, I'm sure another missing email is just gonna seal the deal. Wake me up when Hillary is handcuffed wearing an orange jumpsuit, this is just sensationalism.", '>>{mejoseph9876} : > "weren\'t in her possession" I noticed this in her statement under oath too. "While I do not know what information may be \'responsive\' for purposes of this law suit, I have directed that all my e-mails on clintonemail.com IN MY CUSTODY that were or potentially were federal records to be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done." http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-hillary-clinton-submits-email-information-to-court-under-penalty-of-perjury/ This was a built-in argument for her to say the server wasn\'t in her custody. It was Bill\'s server, or Cooper\'s server, or in Platte River\'s custody...', '>>{mejoseph9876} : Here are some of the work-related e-mails we know she didn\'t turn over... A. E-mail to Huma saying "I don\'t want any risk of the personal being accessible." B. E-mails to/from Cheryl Mills from January-February 2009 when she swore under oath that the server wasn\'t set up until March 17, 2009. C. E-mails from Justin Cooper saying they had to shut the server down because "someone was trying to get in again." D. E-mails to/from Sydney Blumenthal regarding Libya I can keep going. And these are the ones we know about. Strange that the e-mails she didn\'t turn over appear to be among the most damning. EDIT: Let me add the time periods in which no e-mails were turned over... >Stein reports to Grafeld that the “gaps” in Clinton’s emails include: Jan. 21 – March 17, 2009 (Received Messages) Jan. 21 – April 12, 2009 (Sent Messages) Dec. 30, 2012 – Feb. 1, 2013 (Sent Messages) http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-state-department-documents-reveal-hillary-clinton-email-gap/', '>>{mejoseph9876} : >State Department officials then crosschecked the emails from Mr. Blumenthal with the ones Mrs. Clinton had handed over and discovered that she had not provided nine of them and portions of six others. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/26/us/state-dept-gets-libya-emails-that-clinton-didnt-hand-over.html?_r=0', '>>{Th4nk5084m4} : spamming this stuff just takes all the seriousness out of it. Ball-earth level stuff.', '>>{drixhen} : Some people started following it not knowing what it was', '>>{BICHO_CHICKEN_} : Put it this way, it would be very hard for Hillary Clinton to say that someone forced her to use the private server. Hillary Clinton has effectively been pushed into a corner.', ">>{BICHO_CHICKEN_} : Clinton's response in court: >Gmail filtered everything to my spam folder because all emails were viruses from Trump.", '>>{tonyj101} : Trump says dangerous things, Hillary Clinton does dangerous things.', ">>{Tillybam} : If she goes to trial and is charged with, anything, really... Will she be impeeched of she wins the election? I'm incredibly confused how legally she's even able to run at this point..", '>>{John_Robinson} : Somewhat OT, Pagliano sent Clinton a "Happy Birthday" and she delegated the response to some staffer? That\'s cold.', ">>{proggieus} : i honestly wouldn't be surpassed if Huma had full access to her account and didn't take care of the majority of HRC emails for mundane stuff as HRC.", '>>{EggbroHam} : His name is also one of those omitted from her calendar entries.', '>>{Ressotami} : What difference......at this time.....do these crimes make?', '>>{flickerkuu} : So, withholding evidence? Another in a long list of crimes. Can we stop being delusional and arrest/charge/disqualify this person yet?', ">>{uMunthu} : The Clinton campaign hired Beth Wilkinson to try the joint defense of Hillary's aides (H. Abedin has retained her own counsel). Turns out, Wilkinson is DC's leading attorney for White Collar crime defense. So, despite what the Clinton campaign says, this email scandal and the fight over it is really a matter of edging out or going to the big house. Beth's profile on her firms website: http://wilkinsonwalsh.com/who-we-are/beth-wilkinson/ And on Princeton's website: https://www.princeton.edu/~alco/CTNAT/2007/wilkinson.html And on the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/ftc-taps-top-litigator-beth-wilkinson-for-google-probe/2012/04/27/gIQAbCjRlT_story.html Finally, a rather speculative but interesting piece on her here: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/hillarys_fingerprints_on_selection_of_aides_lawyer.html", '>>{Th4nk5084m4} : 20 articles on the front page are email spam. Busters are so informed, though.', '>>{whatnowdog} : That is the way it tends to work for most of the people at or near the top of a government agency or big business. Their administrative assistant reads their email and passes on the ones their boss needs to see and they take care of the emails and telephone calls they can handle.', ">>{cobra-kai_dojo} : That's key. Trump talks a big game but the responsibility of the White House and the slow moving political machine might calm him down. Maybe. With Hillary, we know for a fact that she gives zero fucks except about herself and power. Who would you rather be chief of police in your area? The neighbor who was never law enforcement, but when at your BBQs always seemed super smart and possibly loony? Or the lifelong cop who has a history of deleting dashcam footage, using her personal vehicle instead of a department vehicle, and has spent a lifetime drooling for the power of that top spot? I'll take the maybe crazy over the confirmed psycho - please and thank you.", ">>{cobra-kai_dojo} : And they'll continue voting for her forever just because...", ">>{elitegamerbros} : Wasn't Huma's email to cliton sent from Huma's @state.gov email? Those Hillary wouldn't be able to delete.", '>>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : Good of you to answer for him. Are you his secretary?', ">>{classicbiscuit} : I'll take FUCKING NEITHER - please and thank you.", ">>{Trenta_Is_Not_Enough} : Honestly I just wanna promote Stubbs, the cat that's been a pretty good mayor to Talkeetna at this point.", '>>{libbyfinch} : I wonder how many dead people and retirement home people voted for her...', ">>{iam420friendly} : Yeah, but this is like one of those hypotheticals where the government makes you pick which you'd rather sleep with from two ridiculous options that you would never choose otherwise, except it's not a hypothetical and were actually getting fucked anyways.", '>>{ProfessorHearthstone} : Sad but true. Though it was largely elderly and uneducated that did. You should see her demographics in homes without the internet/TV/etc.', ">>{suzistaxxx} : Fun fact: I talked to Huma on the phone when she was booking a weekend getaway for the Clintons at a resort I used to work at in NY. Anyway the interesting part was that she and bill's assistant were splitting the cost as a present to Hill and Bill, which I found so funny since the room was like $900/night and the Clintons are millionaires. We did have to comp like 30 other rooms for secret service but they were cool and gave us pins.", '>>{BradBrains27} : well mainly because different articles about the same thing get constantly upvoted to the same page. In reality very little has changed and it doesnt seem to be an issue for a large majority. Not saying it isnt something that should be talked about because it should but outside of the reddit and fox news bubble its barely a thing', '>>{Just_An_Average_j0e} : How do people know the inner workings of the state department? Why would she give away her password to another person?', ">>{Not_Pictured} : In someone's custody doesn't mean in their possession. If I let my young kid wander into the street, they haven't left my custody, I'm just a shitty custodian.", '>>{proggieus} : All fine and dandy unless the emails contain compartmentalized Intel the the aide is not cleared for.', '>>{antimatter3009} : > Trump talks a big game but the responsibility of the White House and the slow moving political machine might calm him down. Maybe. The problem is that the exception to the "slow moving political machine" is foreign policy. The President pretty much runs that show. In theory Congress starts and ends wars, but given the last 16+ years we know that practical reality is that the President does what he (or she) wants. In a vacuum I\'d prefer neither, but given the realistic options I\'d absolutely prefer Hillary continue the already existing corruption rather than risk Trump starting WW3 (this time with nukes!). If the Republicans had put forward a sane candidate, this would be the election I *might* actually consider supporting them. Unfortunately, that is not an option.', ">>{GeorgeWashingtonsBro} : She's not stretching the truth, it's just honesty yoga", ">>{bostonT} : Don't worry. The plan is once Hillary gets the presidency, she will immediately pardon or commute his sentence.", ">>{bostonT} : It's viable; she'll just pardon him and anyone else who lines up to take the fall for her once she gets into office.", '>>{escalation} : Stubbs, [damn fine mayor](http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/17/us/alaska-cat-mayor/), we should have more like him. >"He doesn\'t raise our taxes -- we have no sales tax. He doesn\'t interfere with business. He\'s honest," There are of course hints of scandalous activity, but the town seems to be running just fine under his leadership.', ">>{escalation} : Legally she hasn't been convicted. She's allowed to run because the Democratic party hasn't forced her to step down. Regardless of whether she can legally run, she's still in the awkward position of expecting people to overlook her criminality and vote for her", ">>{suzistaxxx} : She was super confusing because they can't like straight up tell you that they were coming. She just kept saying they needed the Presidential suite. It was actually really weird.", '>>{sly_boots} : The American Thinker article is really good, thanks for that.', ">>{Tillybam} : Yeah.. I suppose i knew that. i juat wanted a different answer haha. i just simply can not wrap my head around the dnc and any Democratic voter or super delegate being behind someone who may very well be immediately impeeched upon entering office.. And very rightly so. i think people forget that literally the ONE JOB the president is given is control of our military and safe keeping of delicate and confidential as shit, information. Hilary clearly is fucking awful at doing said job. I just can not keep updating myself fast enough, through this whole election, to fully understand how or why this is even happening.. Especially in that her hole keeps getting dug deeper and deeper and it weirdly just makes people's support for her stronger.", ">>{escalation} : Ya, blows my mind. A large part of it is that the media hasn't exactly gone out of their way to let people know, so it takes longer for word to get around", ">>{dgcaste} : And she can't confirm that Hillary was running for president", '>>{King_of_the_Nerdth} : Well, she wasn\'t particularly competent about technology in general. But, if it were within rules for Hillary to do this and she actually had, I would expect that to be her very first defense along with "other secretaries did this before me", etc. - and since she hasn\'t used it, I don\'t think she gave her password to Huma.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{AbdurRazzaqSindhu} : Message missing from Clinton's submitted emails, State Dept. confirms", '>>{NebraskaGunOwner} : So the argument is now that these emails "weren\'t in her possession". How is that possible unless she deleted them? How can they retrieve them from Huma but not Clinton if they shared the same server? And why is it that the only missing emails so far have directly related to her use of the server. What else did they delete?', '>>{proggieus} : well there is still the matter of the 9 complete and 5 partial(if memory serves) missing from the Blumenthal release to the committee', '>>{green_euphoria} : Didn\'t they try to claim she had no emails with him at all? That they\'re all "missing" despite him setting up and maintaining her server for years?', '>>{pissbum-emeritus} : Hillary is often blamed for acts *Other Hillary* commits.', ">>{Politx} : It's bullshit that she deleted 32000 emails without turning them in based on her own criteria for disclosing them. How stupid does she think people are.", ">>{Politx} : Because she broke the law and isn't being held accountable", '>>{proggieus} : Blumenthal was her private analyst that was barred from working at the state department by the Obama administration, so she hired and paid him out of the clinton foundation. his email account was the one hacked by guccifer but he had nothing to do with her server other then being a recipient /sender over it.', '>>{green_euphoria} : Thanks. So who is the one where all emails are "lost"', ">>{thewhitedeath} : THIS IS HUGE! This is the one that'll bring her down. Hillary is fucked now! Nothing is going to happen.", '>>{proggieus} : Brian Pagliano- the guy who plead the fifth and didn\'t answer a single question in the Judicial Watch deposition. Edit to add- He is fucked by the way, his immunity is the "use" variety which means they can\'t use any evidence against him that comes directly from his testimony or interviews but any evidence gathered from an outside source is fair game and he can be prosecuted. [if this report is true](http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/emails-found-hillary-clintons-senior-staffer-state-department/story?id=38989504) he is a going to be prosecuted unless they re negotiate his immunity deal for him to testify in a criminal proceeding', ">>{dtietje} : I wish these would stop popping up every five minutes. I'd like to see Hillary rot in prison for being a crooked piece of shit as much as the next guy, but this isn't anything substantial.", '>>{androidpk} : The feds already got their use out of Pagliano, there will be no renegotiating. As you said, he is fucked.', '>>{sotech} : It just goes on and on, my friends.', ">>{green_euphoria} : Thanks. I really do follow this stuff extremely closely but it's nice to have a reference considering I'm getting huge players confused", '>>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : So, you support a royal class that is above the law? Good to know.', ">>{thewhitedeath} : I want her to go straight to fucking jail. It's just not going to happen.", '>>{Betterwithcheddar} : Apparently they are stupid enough to ignore it and vote for her. Supposedly vote for her.', '>>{Number1ricky} : whats the odds that somebody working for her will just take the fall for her? Is that situation even viable?', '>>{mostclever_184} : Her supporters keep asking "where\'s the proof?". Wellllll, here\'s proof', '>>{proggieus} : hard for somebody to take the fall for a server she paid for, that was located in her home. Not to mention that many of legal responsibilities she is responsible for came either by the appointment to the job or forms she signed in accepting the job- such as the classified information being marked or unmarked form she signed.', ">>{dtietje} : Yes, I'm sure another missing email is just gonna seal the deal. Wake me up when Hillary is handcuffed wearing an orange jumpsuit, this is just sensationalism.", '>>{mejoseph9876} : > "weren\'t in her possession" I noticed this in her statement under oath too. "While I do not know what information may be \'responsive\' for purposes of this law suit, I have directed that all my e-mails on clintonemail.com IN MY CUSTODY that were or potentially were federal records to be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done." http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-hillary-clinton-submits-email-information-to-court-under-penalty-of-perjury/ This was a built-in argument for her to say the server wasn\'t in her custody. It was Bill\'s server, or Cooper\'s server, or in Platte River\'s custody...', '>>{mejoseph9876} : Here are some of the work-related e-mails we know she didn\'t turn over... A. E-mail to Huma saying "I don\'t want any risk of the personal being accessible." B. E-mails to/from Cheryl Mills from January-February 2009 when she swore under oath that the server wasn\'t set up until March 17, 2009. C. E-mails from Justin Cooper saying they had to shut the server down because "someone was trying to get in again." D. E-mails to/from Sydney Blumenthal regarding Libya I can keep going. And these are the ones we know about. Strange that the e-mails she didn\'t turn over appear to be among the most damning. EDIT: Let me add the time periods in which no e-mails were turned over... >Stein reports to Grafeld that the “gaps” in Clinton’s emails include: Jan. 21 – March 17, 2009 (Received Messages) Jan. 21 – April 12, 2009 (Sent Messages) Dec. 30, 2012 – Feb. 1, 2013 (Sent Messages) http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-state-department-documents-reveal-hillary-clinton-email-gap/', '>>{mejoseph9876} : >State Department officials then crosschecked the emails from Mr. Blumenthal with the ones Mrs. Clinton had handed over and discovered that she had not provided nine of them and portions of six others. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/26/us/state-dept-gets-libya-emails-that-clinton-didnt-hand-over.html?_r=0', '>>{Th4nk5084m4} : spamming this stuff just takes all the seriousness out of it. Ball-earth level stuff.', '>>{drixhen} : Some people started following it not knowing what it was', '>>{BICHO_CHICKEN_} : Put it this way, it would be very hard for Hillary Clinton to say that someone forced her to use the private server. Hillary Clinton has effectively been pushed into a corner.', ">>{BICHO_CHICKEN_} : Clinton's response in court: >Gmail filtered everything to my spam folder because all emails were viruses from Trump.", '>>{tonyj101} : Trump says dangerous things, Hillary Clinton does dangerous things.', ">>{Tillybam} : If she goes to trial and is charged with, anything, really... Will she be impeeched of she wins the election? I'm incredibly confused how legally she's even able to run at this point..", '>>{John_Robinson} : Somewhat OT, Pagliano sent Clinton a "Happy Birthday" and she delegated the response to some staffer? That\'s cold.', ">>{proggieus} : i honestly wouldn't be surpassed if Huma had full access to her account and didn't take care of the majority of HRC emails for mundane stuff as HRC.", '>>{EggbroHam} : His name is also one of those omitted from her calendar entries.', '>>{Ressotami} : What difference......at this time.....do these crimes make?', '>>{flickerkuu} : So, withholding evidence? Another in a long list of crimes. Can we stop being delusional and arrest/charge/disqualify this person yet?', ">>{uMunthu} : The Clinton campaign hired Beth Wilkinson to try the joint defense of Hillary's aides (H. Abedin has retained her own counsel). Turns out, Wilkinson is DC's leading attorney for White Collar crime defense. So, despite what the Clinton campaign says, this email scandal and the fight over it is really a matter of edging out or going to the big house. Beth's profile on her firms website: http://wilkinsonwalsh.com/who-we-are/beth-wilkinson/ And on Princeton's website: https://www.princeton.edu/~alco/CTNAT/2007/wilkinson.html And on the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/ftc-taps-top-litigator-beth-wilkinson-for-google-probe/2012/04/27/gIQAbCjRlT_story.html Finally, a rather speculative but interesting piece on her here: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/hillarys_fingerprints_on_selection_of_aides_lawyer.html", '>>{Th4nk5084m4} : 20 articles on the front page are email spam. Busters are so informed, though.', '>>{whatnowdog} : That is the way it tends to work for most of the people at or near the top of a government agency or big business. Their administrative assistant reads their email and passes on the ones their boss needs to see and they take care of the emails and telephone calls they can handle.', ">>{cobra-kai_dojo} : That's key. Trump talks a big game but the responsibility of the White House and the slow moving political machine might calm him down. Maybe. With Hillary, we know for a fact that she gives zero fucks except about herself and power. Who would you rather be chief of police in your area? The neighbor who was never law enforcement, but when at your BBQs always seemed super smart and possibly loony? Or the lifelong cop who has a history of deleting dashcam footage, using her personal vehicle instead of a department vehicle, and has spent a lifetime drooling for the power of that top spot? I'll take the maybe crazy over the confirmed psycho - please and thank you.", ">>{cobra-kai_dojo} : And they'll continue voting for her forever just because...", ">>{elitegamerbros} : Wasn't Huma's email to cliton sent from Huma's @state.gov email? Those Hillary wouldn't be able to delete.", '>>{Spicy_Clam_Sandwich} : Good of you to answer for him. Are you his secretary?', ">>{classicbiscuit} : I'll take FUCKING NEITHER - please and thank you.", ">>{Trenta_Is_Not_Enough} : Honestly I just wanna promote Stubbs, the cat that's been a pretty good mayor to Talkeetna at this point.", '>>{libbyfinch} : I wonder how many dead people and retirement home people voted for her...', ">>{iam420friendly} : Yeah, but this is like one of those hypotheticals where the government makes you pick which you'd rather sleep with from two ridiculous options that you would never choose otherwise, except it's not a hypothetical and were actually getting fucked anyways.", '>>{ProfessorHearthstone} : Sad but true. Though it was largely elderly and uneducated that did. You should see her demographics in homes without the internet/TV/etc.', ">>{suzistaxxx} : Fun fact: I talked to Huma on the phone when she was booking a weekend getaway for the Clintons at a resort I used to work at in NY. Anyway the interesting part was that she and bill's assistant were splitting the cost as a present to Hill and Bill, which I found so funny since the room was like $900/night and the Clintons are millionaires. We did have to comp like 30 other rooms for secret service but they were cool and gave us pins.", '>>{BradBrains27} : well mainly because different articles about the same thing get constantly upvoted to the same page. In reality very little has changed and it doesnt seem to be an issue for a large majority. Not saying it isnt something that should be talked about because it should but outside of the reddit and fox news bubble its barely a thing', '>>{Just_An_Average_j0e} : How do people know the inner workings of the state department? Why would she give away her password to another person?', ">>{Not_Pictured} : In someone's custody doesn't mean in their possession. If I let my young kid wander into the street, they haven't left my custody, I'm just a shitty custodian.", '>>{proggieus} : All fine and dandy unless the emails contain compartmentalized Intel the the aide is not cleared for.', '>>{antimatter3009} : > Trump talks a big game but the responsibility of the White House and the slow moving political machine might calm him down. Maybe. The problem is that the exception to the "slow moving political machine" is foreign policy. The President pretty much runs that show. In theory Congress starts and ends wars, but given the last 16+ years we know that practical reality is that the President does what he (or she) wants. In a vacuum I\'d prefer neither, but given the realistic options I\'d absolutely prefer Hillary continue the already existing corruption rather than risk Trump starting WW3 (this time with nukes!). If the Republicans had put forward a sane candidate, this would be the election I *might* actually consider supporting them. Unfortunately, that is not an option.', ">>{GeorgeWashingtonsBro} : She's not stretching the truth, it's just honesty yoga", ">>{bostonT} : Don't worry. The plan is once Hillary gets the presidency, she will immediately pardon or commute his sentence.", ">>{bostonT} : It's viable; she'll just pardon him and anyone else who lines up to take the fall for her once she gets into office.", '>>{escalation} : Stubbs, [damn fine mayor](http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/17/us/alaska-cat-mayor/), we should have more like him. >"He doesn\'t raise our taxes -- we have no sales tax. He doesn\'t interfere with business. He\'s honest," There are of course hints of scandalous activity, but the town seems to be running just fine under his leadership.', ">>{escalation} : Legally she hasn't been convicted. She's allowed to run because the Democratic party hasn't forced her to step down. Regardless of whether she can legally run, she's still in the awkward position of expecting people to overlook her criminality and vote for her", ">>{suzistaxxx} : She was super confusing because they can't like straight up tell you that they were coming. She just kept saying they needed the Presidential suite. It was actually really weird.", '>>{sly_boots} : The American Thinker article is really good, thanks for that.', ">>{Tillybam} : Yeah.. I suppose i knew that. i juat wanted a different answer haha. i just simply can not wrap my head around the dnc and any Democratic voter or super delegate being behind someone who may very well be immediately impeeched upon entering office.. And very rightly so. i think people forget that literally the ONE JOB the president is given is control of our military and safe keeping of delicate and confidential as shit, information. Hilary clearly is fucking awful at doing said job. I just can not keep updating myself fast enough, through this whole election, to fully understand how or why this is even happening.. Especially in that her hole keeps getting dug deeper and deeper and it weirdly just makes people's support for her stronger.", ">>{escalation} : Ya, blows my mind. A large part of it is that the media hasn't exactly gone out of their way to let people know, so it takes longer for word to get around", ">>{dgcaste} : And she can't confirm that Hillary was running for president", '>>{King_of_the_Nerdth} : Well, she wasn\'t particularly competent about technology in general. But, if it were within rules for Hillary to do this and she actually had, I would expect that to be her very first defense along with "other secretaries did this before me", etc. - and since she hasn\'t used it, I don\'t think she gave her password to Huma.']]

classify and reply

[">>{Arquette} : The New MacBook Pro: Will it solve the Apple laptop shopper's dilemma?", '>>{fdsewswe} : Nancy Pelosi Claims Government Created the iPhone, Not Steve Jobs or Apple', ">>{Trumptron3000} : [Sounds like an *awfully* familiar line of reasoning from the Democrats.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IejjnZYvMF8) To expound further: all the parts used in the first useful steam engine existed individually for over a thousand years before its invention. That the government had a hand in creating the parts of some object does not give them any credit to its actual invention. edit: going further still, that's like me filling a crate with electromagnets, vacuum pumps, pressure chambers, microprocessors, an assortment of sensors, hydrogen tanks, and pluming, and claiming I'd invented a working fusion reactor. The arrangement of the parts is what matters for an invention.", ">>{jeff1323} : The government giving it's citizens a tool to make their lives easier? I think it'd cost a little bit more than $400 if it was made by the government.", ">>{nathreed} : If you read the reviews on the app (called Fingerprint Password), it seems like it also requires a backup passcode. This is probably the part that works on older devices. I'm not spending $2 to test it though.", '>>{Twatberriesandcream} : Who would pay 2 dollars for something safari does for free?', ">>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Well without the government it wouldn't be what it is today. That being said this was a really really poor choice of words lmao", ">>{kdeff} : >In this smartphone, almost everything came from federal investments in research. Her point is true that many of the technologies came from government research. There would be no iPhone, internet, or even computers without government research. But no, they didn't create it; they created the technologies that enabled it to be created.", '>>{constantino2} : when apple figure out they could sell a $1000+ device to a casual user with ipads and airs, they lost interest in the productivity space...', '>>{SomeRandomProducer} : People already pay for 1Password Edit: lol got downvotes for this really? I use 1Password but I essentially use it for everything safari can do. Hold my passwords, hold my usernames and hold my card info. It can even generate passwords if you like those long random passwords.', '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : The government did literally invent the Internet though. She should have of focused on that.', ">>{websnarf} : She is referring to [this article](http://membercentral.aaas.org/blogs/scientia/iphone-brought-you-bardeen-shockley-and-brattain). But John Bardeen, William Shockley, and Walter Brattain all worked at Bell Labs in New Jersey, not the US government. So, I have no idea what she is talking about. The GPS point she is making, she is correct about. But I don't think she is correct on [any of the other points](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid-crystal_display#History).", ">>{chip_0} : Uncertainty over Trump's immigration policy leads foreign engineers to ditch startups", '>>{habituallydiscarding} : Liz Warren is a big champion of this line of thinking.', '>>{evanstueve} : Yes and no. The latest 15" mbp with the radeon graphics chip is pretty decent still, but yeah I agree they could be making much bigger strides then they are on that front.', '>>{constantino2} : not saying their laptops are crap (just overpriced), but just offering a reason why they are not emphasizing their pro lineups.', '>>{kobesrightelbow} : Dumb Americans voted to keep smart foreigners out. Makes sense.', '>>{basthomas} : You don\'t have to **rememeber** ... and "your private information always remains **in** your device." Seems like a great tool.', ">>{RepelGropers} : They found them furiners' intelligence threatening. DEM IMMIGUNTS DEY TUK R JERBS Meanwhile engineering companies in Canada and Europe are scooping up foreign contracts that used to go to American firms. Uncertainty problems solved.", ">>{jdgood} : According to Betteridge's law, no. What do most power (MBP) users want? Battery and horsepower. If the rumors are true Apple will most likely serve up an even slimmer MBP at the expense of battery and horsepower. I'm not thrilled at all at the prospect of another ATI MBP.", ">>{GoodKingLudericXII} : As a power user that's what I would want for work too. I got a Dell Precision laptop right now... It's thick, it's heavy, but it's powerful enough to run multiple VMs at once and got a decent battery. I couldn't be happier", '>>{chip_0} : The total "number" of foreigners coming in will likely stay the same. However, the smart ones will look at the uncertainty and prefer some place like Canada or the UK.', '>>{fantasifull} : But 1Password does much more than just store identities\\passwords on a single device, ulike this app.', ">>{wrboyce} : To be fair Safari is not limited to one device (iCloud Keychain), but you're not wrong that 1Password is more featureful. I'm a long time 1Password user myself, I particularly like it for storing banking/payment details.", '>>{chip_0} : In startups, yes. Conversely the foreign engineers are now more likely to pursue well established companies like Amazon, Google, Facebook, Apple or Microsoft, reducing the chances of american engineers in such places.', '>>{superlemonmaze} : Because the UK seems like such a welcoming place post Brexit?', ">>{riyoux} : I would use apple product's, especially the MacBook, but like everyone else I think they're way too overpriced. For $1300 I'm building a computer that can do so much more than a simple laptop.", '>>{xzerr} : Every invention stands on the shoulders of every innovation before it. No individual, company, government or civilization is soley responsible', ">>{spacemoose1} : Engineering requires a science education. Half of America thinks that science is a liberal plot to... I don't even know. In any case, the engineering employment rate is lower than the national unemployment rate so there are likely more jobs available than qualified applicants in the US. So, no.", '>>{RHS59} : What about all the commotion over corporations choosing to hire foreign engineers via h1b visas over local ones?', '>>{gilded_gipfeli} : :D! P.S how can I get the green text with my iPhone type next to my username just like yours?', '>>{chip_0} : In comparison to the USA, yes. I believe that the path residency from a work visa is much more timely than in the USA, and there exists no post-Brexit plan to change that. If you have any conflicting information, please share it.', '>>{hammerheadtiger} : You are paying a price for portability. This is true for all laptops. You just have to weight the benefits with the costs and if a self build is more your style, then you were never really in the market for a laptop to start with.', ">>{kuroyume_cl} : Sure, but if they weren't winning the jobs before they may not have been the best qualified applicants. This just lowers the quality of the available talent pool.", '>>{kurros} : On the sidebar over there -> is a checkbox that says "Show my flair on this subreddit. It looks like: gilded_gipfeli (edit)" Click edit and go to town.', ">>{spacemoose1} : According to stats, engineers aren't having trouble finding employment. It's likely just a talking point to engender hatred of outsiders.", '>>{SpodermanWins} : Fuck cnet for autoplaying their shitty videos. This is the last time I open a cnet link.', ">>{OompaLoompaMAGA} : That's the quality post that I expect from DonsCons.", ">>{gilded_gipfeli} : Thanks! Will try it later when I'm on PC.", '>>{StandardKiwi} : Yeah it really the best, Most people use maybe 2-3 diffrent passwords over several hundred sites and the browser have them all saved... = Security score 0 With lastpass, I now have a diffrent password for each and every site, and for most of them, I dont even know the password myself, only lastpass knows and its so smooth!', ">>{fantasifull} : Then I would export my database (like I already have) and migrate to another software. I don't see why lastpass would close in the foreseeable future. Also, this: https://lastpass.com/support.php?cmd=showfaq&id=1376", ">>{BelieveEnemie} : I'm not for any one. I'm just vehemently against anything establishment Democrat.", '>>{bigdonAMAZING} : Foreigners take the jobs for cheaper wages, because most of the time it is an upgrade from their country.', ">>{kuroyume_cl} : That's not how startups work though. When profitability is not a factor you always take the best qualified applicant, not the cheapest one.", '>>{2baldguys} : Not really. Some of those foreign engineers create businesses that employ other engineers. Only they will be doing it elsewhere.', '>>{illyndor} : > Battery and horsepower. Plus build quality and connectivity. For me, add a 17" screen.', ">>{fantasifull} : There is nothing wrong with Keepass btw. I've used it in the past, but for me I prefer LastPass as it is a much more feature rich and polished product. I do like that Keepass is open source though.", '>>{jdgood} : > Plus build quality and connectivity. For me, add a 17" screen. I would have agreed with you once upon a time, but after taking my 2011 17" MBP with me as carry on, and on an inter-city train I can\'t. Being unable to properly view the screen or access the keyboard in the cramped quarters of a train/plane fails a 17" at it\'s primary purpose: of being a laptop. I would go for a 15" and docking-station/primary monitor.', ">>{StandardKiwi} : Also lastpass works on phone in a very user friendly way, that's the primary reason for me chiming out 12$", ">>{DoctrDeep} : The edit basically sums up the Google vs Oracle lawsuit where Oracle sued Google for using its API's in Android.", '>>{ModeratorPowertrip} : When was the last time Apple actually invented anything? Answer: [Never](https://youtu.be/wFeC25BM9E0)', '>>{tms10000} : And yet it would be entirely possible for Apple to bring back a 17" MBP without you being forced to buy one to travel on your inner city train.', '>>{Indictment_Day} : Even with that caveat, it is still not true.', ">>{SomeRandomProducer} : I wasn't arguing anything against 1Password but the major reason why people look into something like 1Password is for the features Safari currently also has. They want to save their passwords and be able to have those password on different devices (I understand safari is only Apple) They want to save credit card info on different devices so they don't have to pull out their wallets constantly. I know 1Password is worth its price but I'm sure there are a lot of people that purchased it before Safari was able to even do the same.", ">>{Indictment_Day} : Between this moron and Elizabeth Warren, we will have Venezuela's economy in 4 years.", '>>{kdeff} : You, sir/maam, need to read up on the history of Military technology and the Space Race.', '>>{juarmis} : For 1300$ you can buy an MSI laptop with a ssd, 32 gb ram, an i7 and a gtx 970m. Macbooks are for people who use design software, or any edition software at a pro level. Anyone else who buys a macbook is a hipster. You can get a better computer for average consumer tasks for the price.', ">>{JPN2214} : Built in Unix-like OS is a plus, although the newest Win10 update might solve that. (haven't tried it yet) How heavy/bulky is said MSI compared to the macbook?", ">>{ModeratorPowertrip} : Yeah, except Apple doesn't invent anything... like... ever.", ">>{1madeamistake} : I've spent about 50 on 1Password so far and I can say that it was totally worth it. Having it on my Mac and IPhone makes it so simple. Having all my password and notes and info all accessible is really nice. I also can download it to my PC when I get one and then all my passwords are there too. I think it is the perfect solution.", '>>{shogekix} : Right now in NYC they are 90000 unfilled engineering positions. They are enough jobs for anyone qualified.', '>>{JPN2214} : I want a MBP for Unix-like OS, and efficiency using pro design software. Sincerely, 90% satisfied Dell customer.', '>>{TheDiddler69710} : How do I keep my steel drums from auto-playing?', '>>{lucy99654} : Source for the original claims (which had little to do with the click-bait title of the article): http://www.aau.edu/research/smartphone.aspx', ">>{JPN2214} : Honestly I wish they'd make a text only website... Maybe I should use Firefox with reading mode. Does Edge include it as well these days?", '>>{kuroyume_cl} : Not really. Startups are not expected to profit for years. Uber is expected to lose 2.6 billion dollars this year, for example. As long as you can keep the venture capital coming short term profitability is not an issue.', ">>{kdeff} : Sure, remain ignorant. Im sure you'll make good political and life choices.", ">>{kuroyume_cl} : Why would they? There's plenty of engineering jobs in Canada, the UK, Germany, China, etc. Talented engineers are always in demand,", ">>{Indictment_Day} : I've read the Bible; Jesus created the iphone.", ">>{kuroyume_cl} : haven't you heard? statistics are a liberal conspiracy.", '>>{Schnort} : > Yes and no. The latest 15" mbp with the radeon graphics chip is pretty decent still, but yeah I agree they could be making much bigger strides then they are on that front. The price, however, is ludicrous.', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : You're fucked if you need passwords from your iCloud Keychain on Windows though.", '>>{ItchyThunder} : I wonder why so many H1B visa holders go through so much pain for years if it is so easy to move to UK or Canada and get a good job?', '>>{chip_0} : As an engineer considering offers to move to the UK or Canada, what is my incentive to wait? While it is possible to earn a higher wage in the USA (for now), those countries have a better immigration policy even as things stand today.', ">>{neoblackdragon} : What sucks is Designers think it's actually true. No folks, you don't need a Macbook to do design work. Adobe has long since provided great software for Windows and other vendors have long since provided a beefy portable machine. Seriously designers don't know why they need an Apple machine for their work. It's all, well in 2000 we used macs.", ">>{wrboyce} : Yeah, practically all my machines run some kind of Apple OS so I'm mostly good, but logging into stuff on my Linux machines (where neither iCloud Keychain nor 1Password are available) can be annoying.", ">>{KeepItRealTV} : How would Win10 update solve that? Also, looking at Newegg, it looks like it's about 4.2 lbs. http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100167748%2050001312%20600536650%20600544982%20600004927", ">>{cool_hand_luke} : Apple claims to have invented it, and they're wrong too.", '>>{EllisHughTiger} : The govt and other companies laid the groundwork and basics of the Internet, but the rest of the market actually took it and made it what it is today. Govt funded research creates a lot of stuff, but often little is done until some companies can find a way to make it marketable and profitable.', ">>{JPN2214} : The newest Win10 update builds in Ubuntu within Windows to an extent. Also, interesting! I'm not a huge fan of the look, but I can't argue with the specs in that shell.", ">>{KeepItRealTV} : > The newest Win10 update builds in Ubuntu within Windows to an extent. That's interesting. I guess I have to update to check it out then. Thanks for the info.", '>>{RepelGropers} : Many have already reached that conclusion. I speak from personal experience. I would recommend they go North.', ">>{chip_0} : What pain? You cannot vote while you are on an H1B, and have to file some paperwork every 3 years, but otherwise it's all good. Things *could* change though, and that is why you may see many engineers leaving over the next few years.", ">>{ThouHastLostAn8th} : > this was a really really poor choice of words Those weren't her words, they're crunchbace.co's click-bait paraphrasing. She never even said the word iPhone, she talked about smartphone's generically, and what technologies they depend on came from government investments in technology and science.", ">>{Gene_Grantham} : Actually, no, but really it's my fault for assuming you read the article.", '>>{badgerbacon6} : Some companies like Disney have misused the H1B visa to hire foreign works for lower wages than citizen. This is not the intention of the H1B & these companies should be prosecuted. The H1B should still exist because it is meant for only jobs where qualified American workers cant be found. Disney infamously made citizens train their foreign replacements, so clearly there were qualified americans & they were breaking the law.', '>>{atchijov} : Jesus created Android. This is why there are so many versions of it. iPhone is more of Buda product. Single interpretation (disclaimer, I am not an expert on Buddhism).', '>>{AlexTraner} : But these are the same things iCloud Keychain does. I mean the working on Windows part is great and all. But not worth money imo when you can use all the note type stuff from iCloud.com', '>>{kuroyume_cl} : What pain? H1Bs are easy to get and most of the work is done by the employer anyways.', '>>{librarygrrl} : Love LastPass! I considered KeePass, as I like to dabble in Linux, but the LastPass app is the bomb.', '>>{RHS59} : What is more important, the best qualified applicants getting jobs or the U.S. economy being able to have jobs for all its young people.', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : If you use the shittier/less secure .agilekeychain format, you can open 1Password.html and view a web interface for your 1Password data in any system with a web browser. It's not ideal, but it does help get by on systems without native support.", '>>{wrboyce} : Going off on a bit of a tangent, do you know *why* 1Password uses two different formats; the `cloudkeychain` being much more secure/less shitty. Is it something to do with the JavaScript stuff? It seems very arbitrary to say "if you\'re using X sync provider we\'ll use Y file format". I have some benchmarks on this from a project a while ago: Hashtype: 1Password, agilekeychain Workload: 1000 loops, 64 accel Speed.GPU.#1.: 356.8 kH/s Speed.GPU.#2.: 357.0 kH/s Speed.GPU.#3.: 357.0 kH/s Speed.GPU.#4.: 357.0 kH/s Speed.GPU.#*.: 1427.9 kH/s Hashtype: 1Password, cloudkeychain Workload: 1024 loops, 2 accel Speed.GPU.#1.: 717 H/s Speed.GPU.#2.: 718 H/s Speed.GPU.#3.: 717 H/s Speed.GPU.#4.: 718 H/s Speed.GPU.#*.: 2869 H/s', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : My understanding was that opvault was just agilekeychain version 2, right? agilekeychain exposed things like the sites URL and title. opvault stops that. I honestly didn't follow the reasoning behind it.", '>>{chip_0} : > the U.S. economy being able to have jobs for all its young people. This can never happen, because most young americans do not choose STEM fields, and the employment rates for many other fields are dropping as computers and automation takes over.', ">>{violentintenttoday} : Well of course she does, how else can they justify cranking up the corporate tax rate in the US that is already the second highest in the world behind Japan? You didn't do that. Someone else made that happen", '>>{Aleblanco1987} : the biggest problem is that the macbook air and the macbook are too similar in what they bring to the table', ">>{violentintenttoday} : the innovations Apple does make are hard to quantify. Like there is no such thing as an iPod, but you know as soon as you have one in your hand what an iPod is and how it's not the same thing as a creative labs mp3 player. It's not worth the price difference in my mind, but I understand what apple's innovation is.", ">>{RHS59} : We're talking about STEM majors right now. Shouldn't the US gov't be doing what it can to ensure that most if not all American citizens are chosen first to benefit US first?", ">>{chip_0} : They would need to balance that against the ensuing cost to the US economy. With that said, what makes you think that there are enough decent STEM majors in the USA to fill all the engineering jobs? Math is hard and most people don't want to gruel through it.", '>>{atsugnam} : Tim Berners Lee worked at CERN when http was invented, prior to that there was no real Internet as you see it today.', ">>{hammerheadtiger} : You brought a specs argument to a portability discussion. There's no doubt you can get a more powerful computer for the money when you start to sacrifice weight and build materials. The laptop you mention is almost twice as heavy, almost twice as thick, plastic, has a much lower resolution membrane screen with no cover glass, and has a reported 1 hour of battery life while using the all specs you mention.", '>>{violentintenttoday} : Claiming all research coming out of universities as "government" by Pelosi is a bit of a stretch. It\'s almost as bad as Obama\'s "If you have a small business you didn\'t build it because at some point somewhere some government employee was a teacher or a mentor or whatever" disaster. Also, like the article said, a lot of the components came from the private sector', ">>{violentintenttoday} : Are you for real? is this some kind of trolling attempt where you do the thing you're calling someone else on?", ">>{UpstairsNeighbor} : I'll occasionally defend Apple's pricing, but not this one. The fact that you have to *start* at $2500 to get a discreet GPU is ridiculous.", ">>{ModeratorPowertrip} : Of course. Apple makes the world a better place. They just don't invent new technology. They modify and enhance the technology that other companies invent.", '>>{buckyVanBuren} : CERN was the birthplace of the World Wide Web.', ">>{superlemonmaze} : Conflicting information regarding uncertainty for immigrant workers in Britain post Brexit? You will find an abundance of articles addressing this topic. There are millions of non resident workers in the UK who are worried about their future employment and freedom to move about Europe. It's hard to see how the unknown consequences of Brexit are not a concern for a highly skilled tech employee with international mobility.", '>>{RagingCain} : And markup the cost approximately another 200-500% to consumers who will essentially argue for that extra value/premium. Now that we can install OSX on custom built PCs, there are alternatives finally.', ">>{RHS59} : Because then you wouldn't have STEM majors living in their parents basements. You wouldn't have STEM majors in the midwest unable to get jobs. You wouldn't have STEM majors complaining about H1B Visas if everything was sunshine and roses.", ">>{fourseven66} : It's not that they're necessary, it's that the way the OS is implemented tends to agree with people who have a creative background.", '>>{chip_0} : \\[citation required\\] [Here](https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm) is a report which does not find a shortage in STEM jobs. To quote: > In the private sector, software developers, petroleum engineers, data scientists, and those in skilled trades are in high demand; there is an abundant supply of biomedical, chemistry, and physics Ph.D.’s; and transient shortages and surpluses of electrical engineers occur from time to time.', '>>{fourseven66} : This would be more true if the MacBook had more ports, or the Air had a retina display.', '>>{Aleblanco1987} : I mean the idea, before, the air was THE light and thin laptop, nos the macbook is taking its place. They should combine them in 1 product with 11 and 13 inch retina displays', '>>{hybridanimal} : Define "invent" and I think you\'ll find this is most companies.', ">>{kiramis} : My only concern with this is that Trump seems to be waffling on H-1B visa reform in general. I have no problem with letting in truly high-skill workers, but a lot of the people on H-1Bs aren't really high-skill they are just willing to work for less or put up with more abuse (excessive hours) than Americans because if they can hang on long enough they can get citizenship. At the very least anyone that has to be trained by outgoing laid-off workers should be excluded.", ">>{formerprof} : US drugs and tech are often created with tax payer funds. They are then given or sold for a pittance to private companies who charge the tax payer for use of the product. China's Stae run enterprises and state-private partnerships do a much better job of ensuring that the public continues to get the benefit of research funded at state expense.", '>>{RHS59} : Where are you getting that a shortage of STEM jobs correlates with STEM majors and graduates being unable to a ge a job?', '>>{RVA2DC} : Previously, the vast majority of public university funding was provided by, well the public (a.k.a. the government). When the advances in technology took place that allow for the iPhone to exist (such as those in the article you commented on), this was certainly the case. So if an entity receives >50% of its funding from the government, what would you call the research they do? Private?', ">>{chip_0} : Heh, I don't even know what to say to that.", ">>{fourseven66} : It's definitely a little messy right now. Clearly the Air is an awkward remnant right now, and will probably be discontinued soon.", '>>{ItchyThunder} : We do not know what will change. That is why this article is premature.', ">>{ScreamingUpAtUs} : But it wouldn't have become a product available for global consumption without the market.", '>>{ModeratorPowertrip} : I mean... this is true for most companies. Walmart doesn\'t tend to invent stuff. McDonald\'s doesn\'t tend to invent things. Target holds few patents... But most tech companies invent things and aren\'t claiming "curved edges" and "wedge shaped" laptops. Those are the only "inventions" Apple believes it invented, and it\'s a disgrace.', ">>{hybridanimal} : I was speaking specifically of tech companies, but I disagree with the notion that 'most tech companies invent things' and I've never seen Apple claim to invent either of those things.", '>>{Comma20} : Great music production devices pre-windows getting their sound drivers and stability together.', ">>{LCDRDATASBIGROBOCOCK} : Remember everyone to a statist all good and wonderful things flow from government control. Nothing good ever comes from the citizens, their hard work and effort, their willingness to work with others free of coersion, and the risks they take with their personal wealth. You can only succeed with government, you can't do it on your own, you didn't build that, etc.", ">>{RedHeadedMenace} : Its got kernel level support for bash, and its own package manager. I haven't gotten to take a look at it yet, but if they nail this, I might be in love with my windows PC again.", '>>{ItchyThunder} : Not true. I work in IT and know the subject.', '>>{hybridanimal} : Having a patent ≠ claiming to invent. You can disagree with their patents/lawsuits and the patenting process in general but my point still stands.', '>>{KeepItRealTV} : Woah! I can write one script for Mac, Linux, and Windows natively?! Where has this been all my life?', '>>{ModeratorPowertrip} : > Having a patent ≠ claiming to invent False. Your point is based in ignorance.', '>>{RHS59} : You can have an abundance of jobs but the standards of the business too high for applicants ( a whole other problem).', '>>{Xalteox} : This really does frustrate me. I would consider Windows nice... If it were built with a Unix/Linux kernel like every other operating system. IIRC, Microsoft once tried to redesign their Kernel and failed miserably.', ">>{chip_0} : People who will be affected by the uncertainty won't sit around waiting patiently. If they are smart, they'll take action (or at least explore other options) starting from now. That's what the article highlights.", ">>{chip_0} : Well, doesn't that mean that until the standards of the workforce are raised, immigration is the only way to get a strong technology sector?", '>>{Hitchens92} : Can confirm, I am an Engineering Graduate and have turned down several job offers', '>>{spacemoose1} : Nice. Software engineer here. Jobs are scarce for programming unless you want to live in a big city... but then all of your income is consumed by cost of living. A catch 22.', ">>{archaway} : I agree, I purchased my rMCB for three reasons: 1, I needed an i7 (quad core w/hyperthreading). 2, I didn't want dragon LED or aliens on it, I love the aesthetic of the Macbook, it looks profession, and 3, I wanted reliability.", '>>{archaway} : I think its inevitable that the new Macbook will evolve to have a few more ports and maybe a MicroSD card.', ">>{_pixie_} : Yea that's what she said ;) not that they 'created' the iPhone. You should write titles.", ">>{PM_ME_ALL_THE_BOOBIE} : It's more like they used Mac so much they are more comfortable with Mac than Windows. People who are used to something **really** don't like moving away from it.", '>>{RHS59} : >standards of the workforce Or maybe, just maybe, the standards of businesses are too high for the time being.', ">>{Hitchens92} : Yup my cousin is a SE. He works for Tesla doing the programming for the self driving aspect. Software Engineer is a newer Engineering field. I suspect that as automation becomes a bigger thing you'll find more job openings in the future. SE degrees will probably increase in demand within next 5-10 years. Probably a good decision on your part if you're a recent graduate.", ">>{websnarf} : > Her point is true that many of the technologies came from government research. No, it's not. The LCD, touch screen, the material science for all the chips and so on inside the phone, Siri's voice recognition and AI, and all the software was not largely government sponsored. GPS and the internet are the only two things you can seriously cite as being products of federal funding. > There would be no iPhone, internet, or even computers without government research. Well ok, that's utter nonsense. All of those things would have existed, but likely have taken on different forms, and most decidedly have had a different history. But some version of it would have existed even if it came about as a result of purely private ventures. We know this because most of it did.", '>>{MassiveFire} : Looking at the price i would rather build a pc and then hack a ups to cram as much lithium ion cells i can into it. Then i will ask my local iron smith to make a metal frame for my monitor and keyboard so that it resembles a lapdock.', '>>{chip_0} : What do you mean "too high"? The standards of business depends on the quality of the workforce. If talented engineers do not move to and work in america, some other country will take them, increase the standard of their business and adversely affect the american economy. Also, "standards of business" cannot be dictated by the government in a free market society.', '>>{spacemoose1} : I graduated over a decade ago, but somebody will have to boss around the robot programmers, lol.', '>>{RHS59} : The businesses of America need to adjust their standards to what the workforce of America (aka what our colleges produce) is giving them.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems, or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems, or were not results of government funding.', '>>{chip_0} : Why? Technology is a global market and all the major players like Google or Microsoft are global entities, involving teams spread across many nations. Also, many american college STEM graduates tend to be foreign.', ">>{CGNer} : Mmmmmmm I live in Canada and we're trying to prevent foreigners from invading us economically. In Vancouver we had to issue a 15% tax on foreign real estate investors to slow them down... Chinese are pissed at us. But thankfully, it's working...", '>>{RHS59} : > like Google or Microsoft are global entities Which is a part of the problem for many Americans.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{chip_0} : Canada has very friendly legal immigration laws, so if you consider that "invasion" too, I have bad news for you.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', ">>{chip_0} : Well, you can't really do anything about that one. They are global entities and it is why they become so big and powerful.", '>>{RHS59} : And people voted against globalization this election because its not helping them or directly hurting them.', '>>{chip_0} : You cannot simply "vote" globalization out. Technology is inherently global. Take my programming job for example. Although I live in the USA and pay taxes here, I only show up to work for meetings and sometimes I use video conferencing to attend. This allows me to work with a team stretched across the whole globe. I could do my same job from the UK or anywhere else if I chose too. If americans try to insulate themselves from this phenomenon, they will simply be left behind as the rest of us, along with technology, move forward. What you *can* do is vote to ensure that the benefits of globalization are not concentrated in the hands of a few, and are used to help people who are hurting. However, that is not what happened this election.', ">>{CGNer} : LOL... What are you talking about? Getting a work visa might be easy, but getting permanent residency is far from easy... Also note we've deported on average 35 people a day. That's a lot for a country with 36 million people.. http://www.neverhome.ca/deportation/", '>>{chip_0} : [Wrong.](http://www.cic.gc.ca/ENGLISH/helpcentre/answer.asp?qnum=375&top=29) You can apply for residency three years after working on a work visa, shorter than most countries.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', ">>{CGNer} : Yeah, you can APPLY. Don't mean shit though. Ask anyone going through the process... My friend JUST got his approval after 15 years (he's British) AND he's married to a Canadian gal...", '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{atsugnam} : And http, you know the first half of the protocol the Internet is built on...', '>>{chip_0} : Heh, countering your anecdotal evidence (perhaps your friend was jobless or something), I know tons of people who converted from work visas to PRs in the three years I lived in Canada. All of them worked in STEM fields, which may have helped them.', ">>{CGNer} : I'm not saying it's not possible. Most have bought their way in (which is what they are trying to slow down now). But that just means it's easy to immigrate to Canada if you have money or a very desirable skill. If you're a nobody, good luck. But that applies to the USA too. All our doctors immigrate to the USA for example. Better money and they can get green cards with little hassle...", '>>{chip_0} : For a STEM graduate (which is what this article is about), Canada is a good choice to immigrate to.', ">>{RHS59} : If voting made sure that the benefits of globalization weren't in the hands of the few, 99.9% of the programming, UX, web design, etc jobs wouldn't all be in California/ Nevada There'd be a western, southern, midwestern, and eastern tech hubs.", ">>{chip_0} : Why? Programmers tend to be young, liberal and from diverse backgrounds. California (or Seattle) is the best place to set up shop to attract such talent. There are tech jobs in the south and midwest, but they don't end up attracting as many folk.", '>>{RHS59} : If programmers tend to be young, liberal, and from diverse backgrounds, then what should the primarily white students from colleges like Iowa State University do with their STEM degrees? Move out to a state that has a high cost of living and conflicts with their values or somehow erect a new Silicon Valley out of thin air? Seems kinda unfair that you have to be either liberal, brown, a stem major or a combination of the three to get anywhere as a millenial.', ">>{chip_0} : > Move out to a state that has a high cost of living and conflicts with their values or somehow erect a new Silicon Valley out of thin air? Basically, yes. What do you want the government or the rest of us to do about it? Most people in the silicon valley moved there from elsewhere. > Seems kinda unfair that you have to be either liberal, brown, a stem major or a combination of the three to get anywhere as a millenial. You don't need to be liberal or brown but you definitely need to get used to working with plenty of liberal and brown folk. And yes, STEM skills are mandatory.", '>>{solartai} : I can open command prompt and play the star wars Easter egg, am I qualified to do STEM work?']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{nathreed} : If you read the reviews on the app (called Fingerprint Password), it seems like it also requires a backup passcode. This is probably the part that works on older devices. I'm not spending $2 to test it though.", '>>{Twatberriesandcream} : Who would pay 2 dollars for something safari does for free?', '>>{SomeRandomProducer} : People already pay for 1Password Edit: lol got downvotes for this really? I use 1Password but I essentially use it for everything safari can do. Hold my passwords, hold my usernames and hold my card info. It can even generate passwords if you like those long random passwords.', '>>{basthomas} : You don\'t have to **rememeber** ... and "your private information always remains **in** your device." Seems like a great tool.', '>>{fantasifull} : But 1Password does much more than just store identities\\passwords on a single device, ulike this app.', ">>{wrboyce} : To be fair Safari is not limited to one device (iCloud Keychain), but you're not wrong that 1Password is more featureful. I'm a long time 1Password user myself, I particularly like it for storing banking/payment details.", '>>{gilded_gipfeli} : :D! P.S how can I get the green text with my iPhone type next to my username just like yours?', '>>{kurros} : On the sidebar over there -> is a checkbox that says "Show my flair on this subreddit. It looks like: gilded_gipfeli (edit)" Click edit and go to town.', ">>{gilded_gipfeli} : Thanks! Will try it later when I'm on PC.", '>>{StandardKiwi} : Yeah it really the best, Most people use maybe 2-3 diffrent passwords over several hundred sites and the browser have them all saved... = Security score 0 With lastpass, I now have a diffrent password for each and every site, and for most of them, I dont even know the password myself, only lastpass knows and its so smooth!', ">>{fantasifull} : Then I would export my database (like I already have) and migrate to another software. I don't see why lastpass would close in the foreseeable future. Also, this: https://lastpass.com/support.php?cmd=showfaq&id=1376", ">>{fantasifull} : There is nothing wrong with Keepass btw. I've used it in the past, but for me I prefer LastPass as it is a much more feature rich and polished product. I do like that Keepass is open source though.", ">>{StandardKiwi} : Also lastpass works on phone in a very user friendly way, that's the primary reason for me chiming out 12$", ">>{SomeRandomProducer} : I wasn't arguing anything against 1Password but the major reason why people look into something like 1Password is for the features Safari currently also has. They want to save their passwords and be able to have those password on different devices (I understand safari is only Apple) They want to save credit card info on different devices so they don't have to pull out their wallets constantly. I know 1Password is worth its price but I'm sure there are a lot of people that purchased it before Safari was able to even do the same.", ">>{1madeamistake} : I've spent about 50 on 1Password so far and I can say that it was totally worth it. Having it on my Mac and IPhone makes it so simple. Having all my password and notes and info all accessible is really nice. I also can download it to my PC when I get one and then all my passwords are there too. I think it is the perfect solution.", '>>{TheDiddler69710} : How do I keep my steel drums from auto-playing?', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : You're fucked if you need passwords from your iCloud Keychain on Windows though.", ">>{wrboyce} : Yeah, practically all my machines run some kind of Apple OS so I'm mostly good, but logging into stuff on my Linux machines (where neither iCloud Keychain nor 1Password are available) can be annoying.", '>>{AlexTraner} : But these are the same things iCloud Keychain does. I mean the working on Windows part is great and all. But not worth money imo when you can use all the note type stuff from iCloud.com', '>>{librarygrrl} : Love LastPass! I considered KeePass, as I like to dabble in Linux, but the LastPass app is the bomb.', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : If you use the shittier/less secure .agilekeychain format, you can open 1Password.html and view a web interface for your 1Password data in any system with a web browser. It's not ideal, but it does help get by on systems without native support.", '>>{wrboyce} : Going off on a bit of a tangent, do you know *why* 1Password uses two different formats; the `cloudkeychain` being much more secure/less shitty. Is it something to do with the JavaScript stuff? It seems very arbitrary to say "if you\'re using X sync provider we\'ll use Y file format". I have some benchmarks on this from a project a while ago: Hashtype: 1Password, agilekeychain Workload: 1000 loops, 64 accel Speed.GPU.#1.: 356.8 kH/s Speed.GPU.#2.: 357.0 kH/s Speed.GPU.#3.: 357.0 kH/s Speed.GPU.#4.: 357.0 kH/s Speed.GPU.#*.: 1427.9 kH/s Hashtype: 1Password, cloudkeychain Workload: 1024 loops, 2 accel Speed.GPU.#1.: 717 H/s Speed.GPU.#2.: 718 H/s Speed.GPU.#3.: 717 H/s Speed.GPU.#4.: 718 H/s Speed.GPU.#*.: 2869 H/s', ">>{C02JN1LHDKQ1} : My understanding was that opvault was just agilekeychain version 2, right? agilekeychain exposed things like the sites URL and title. opvault stops that. I honestly didn't follow the reasoning behind it."], [">>{chip_0} : Uncertainty over Trump's immigration policy leads foreign engineers to ditch startups", '>>{kobesrightelbow} : Dumb Americans voted to keep smart foreigners out. Makes sense.', ">>{RepelGropers} : They found them furiners' intelligence threatening. DEM IMMIGUNTS DEY TUK R JERBS Meanwhile engineering companies in Canada and Europe are scooping up foreign contracts that used to go to American firms. Uncertainty problems solved.", '>>{chip_0} : The total "number" of foreigners coming in will likely stay the same. However, the smart ones will look at the uncertainty and prefer some place like Canada or the UK.', '>>{chip_0} : In startups, yes. Conversely the foreign engineers are now more likely to pursue well established companies like Amazon, Google, Facebook, Apple or Microsoft, reducing the chances of american engineers in such places.', '>>{superlemonmaze} : Because the UK seems like such a welcoming place post Brexit?', ">>{spacemoose1} : Engineering requires a science education. Half of America thinks that science is a liberal plot to... I don't even know. In any case, the engineering employment rate is lower than the national unemployment rate so there are likely more jobs available than qualified applicants in the US. So, no.", '>>{RHS59} : What about all the commotion over corporations choosing to hire foreign engineers via h1b visas over local ones?', '>>{chip_0} : In comparison to the USA, yes. I believe that the path residency from a work visa is much more timely than in the USA, and there exists no post-Brexit plan to change that. If you have any conflicting information, please share it.', ">>{kuroyume_cl} : Sure, but if they weren't winning the jobs before they may not have been the best qualified applicants. This just lowers the quality of the available talent pool.", ">>{spacemoose1} : According to stats, engineers aren't having trouble finding employment. It's likely just a talking point to engender hatred of outsiders.", '>>{bigdonAMAZING} : Foreigners take the jobs for cheaper wages, because most of the time it is an upgrade from their country.', ">>{kuroyume_cl} : That's not how startups work though. When profitability is not a factor you always take the best qualified applicant, not the cheapest one.", '>>{2baldguys} : Not really. Some of those foreign engineers create businesses that employ other engineers. Only they will be doing it elsewhere.', '>>{shogekix} : Right now in NYC they are 90000 unfilled engineering positions. They are enough jobs for anyone qualified.', '>>{kuroyume_cl} : Not really. Startups are not expected to profit for years. Uber is expected to lose 2.6 billion dollars this year, for example. As long as you can keep the venture capital coming short term profitability is not an issue.', ">>{kuroyume_cl} : Why would they? There's plenty of engineering jobs in Canada, the UK, Germany, China, etc. Talented engineers are always in demand,", ">>{kuroyume_cl} : haven't you heard? statistics are a liberal conspiracy.", '>>{ItchyThunder} : I wonder why so many H1B visa holders go through so much pain for years if it is so easy to move to UK or Canada and get a good job?', '>>{chip_0} : As an engineer considering offers to move to the UK or Canada, what is my incentive to wait? While it is possible to earn a higher wage in the USA (for now), those countries have a better immigration policy even as things stand today.', '>>{RepelGropers} : Many have already reached that conclusion. I speak from personal experience. I would recommend they go North.', ">>{chip_0} : What pain? You cannot vote while you are on an H1B, and have to file some paperwork every 3 years, but otherwise it's all good. Things *could* change though, and that is why you may see many engineers leaving over the next few years.", ">>{Gene_Grantham} : Actually, no, but really it's my fault for assuming you read the article.", '>>{badgerbacon6} : Some companies like Disney have misused the H1B visa to hire foreign works for lower wages than citizen. This is not the intention of the H1B & these companies should be prosecuted. The H1B should still exist because it is meant for only jobs where qualified American workers cant be found. Disney infamously made citizens train their foreign replacements, so clearly there were qualified americans & they were breaking the law.', '>>{kuroyume_cl} : What pain? H1Bs are easy to get and most of the work is done by the employer anyways.', '>>{RHS59} : What is more important, the best qualified applicants getting jobs or the U.S. economy being able to have jobs for all its young people.', '>>{chip_0} : > the U.S. economy being able to have jobs for all its young people. This can never happen, because most young americans do not choose STEM fields, and the employment rates for many other fields are dropping as computers and automation takes over.', ">>{RHS59} : We're talking about STEM majors right now. Shouldn't the US gov't be doing what it can to ensure that most if not all American citizens are chosen first to benefit US first?", ">>{chip_0} : They would need to balance that against the ensuing cost to the US economy. With that said, what makes you think that there are enough decent STEM majors in the USA to fill all the engineering jobs? Math is hard and most people don't want to gruel through it.", ">>{superlemonmaze} : Conflicting information regarding uncertainty for immigrant workers in Britain post Brexit? You will find an abundance of articles addressing this topic. There are millions of non resident workers in the UK who are worried about their future employment and freedom to move about Europe. It's hard to see how the unknown consequences of Brexit are not a concern for a highly skilled tech employee with international mobility.", ">>{RHS59} : Because then you wouldn't have STEM majors living in their parents basements. You wouldn't have STEM majors in the midwest unable to get jobs. You wouldn't have STEM majors complaining about H1B Visas if everything was sunshine and roses.", '>>{chip_0} : \\[citation required\\] [Here](https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm) is a report which does not find a shortage in STEM jobs. To quote: > In the private sector, software developers, petroleum engineers, data scientists, and those in skilled trades are in high demand; there is an abundant supply of biomedical, chemistry, and physics Ph.D.’s; and transient shortages and surpluses of electrical engineers occur from time to time.', ">>{kiramis} : My only concern with this is that Trump seems to be waffling on H-1B visa reform in general. I have no problem with letting in truly high-skill workers, but a lot of the people on H-1Bs aren't really high-skill they are just willing to work for less or put up with more abuse (excessive hours) than Americans because if they can hang on long enough they can get citizenship. At the very least anyone that has to be trained by outgoing laid-off workers should be excluded.", '>>{RHS59} : Where are you getting that a shortage of STEM jobs correlates with STEM majors and graduates being unable to a ge a job?', ">>{chip_0} : Heh, I don't even know what to say to that.", '>>{ItchyThunder} : We do not know what will change. That is why this article is premature.', '>>{ItchyThunder} : Not true. I work in IT and know the subject.', '>>{RHS59} : You can have an abundance of jobs but the standards of the business too high for applicants ( a whole other problem).', ">>{chip_0} : People who will be affected by the uncertainty won't sit around waiting patiently. If they are smart, they'll take action (or at least explore other options) starting from now. That's what the article highlights.", ">>{chip_0} : Well, doesn't that mean that until the standards of the workforce are raised, immigration is the only way to get a strong technology sector?", '>>{Hitchens92} : Can confirm, I am an Engineering Graduate and have turned down several job offers', '>>{spacemoose1} : Nice. Software engineer here. Jobs are scarce for programming unless you want to live in a big city... but then all of your income is consumed by cost of living. A catch 22.', '>>{RHS59} : >standards of the workforce Or maybe, just maybe, the standards of businesses are too high for the time being.', ">>{Hitchens92} : Yup my cousin is a SE. He works for Tesla doing the programming for the self driving aspect. Software Engineer is a newer Engineering field. I suspect that as automation becomes a bigger thing you'll find more job openings in the future. SE degrees will probably increase in demand within next 5-10 years. Probably a good decision on your part if you're a recent graduate.", '>>{chip_0} : What do you mean "too high"? The standards of business depends on the quality of the workforce. If talented engineers do not move to and work in america, some other country will take them, increase the standard of their business and adversely affect the american economy. Also, "standards of business" cannot be dictated by the government in a free market society.', '>>{spacemoose1} : I graduated over a decade ago, but somebody will have to boss around the robot programmers, lol.', '>>{RHS59} : The businesses of America need to adjust their standards to what the workforce of America (aka what our colleges produce) is giving them.', '>>{chip_0} : Why? Technology is a global market and all the major players like Google or Microsoft are global entities, involving teams spread across many nations. Also, many american college STEM graduates tend to be foreign.', ">>{CGNer} : Mmmmmmm I live in Canada and we're trying to prevent foreigners from invading us economically. In Vancouver we had to issue a 15% tax on foreign real estate investors to slow them down... Chinese are pissed at us. But thankfully, it's working...", '>>{RHS59} : > like Google or Microsoft are global entities Which is a part of the problem for many Americans.', '>>{chip_0} : Canada has very friendly legal immigration laws, so if you consider that "invasion" too, I have bad news for you.', ">>{chip_0} : Well, you can't really do anything about that one. They are global entities and it is why they become so big and powerful.", '>>{RHS59} : And people voted against globalization this election because its not helping them or directly hurting them.', '>>{chip_0} : You cannot simply "vote" globalization out. Technology is inherently global. Take my programming job for example. Although I live in the USA and pay taxes here, I only show up to work for meetings and sometimes I use video conferencing to attend. This allows me to work with a team stretched across the whole globe. I could do my same job from the UK or anywhere else if I chose too. If americans try to insulate themselves from this phenomenon, they will simply be left behind as the rest of us, along with technology, move forward. What you *can* do is vote to ensure that the benefits of globalization are not concentrated in the hands of a few, and are used to help people who are hurting. However, that is not what happened this election.', ">>{CGNer} : LOL... What are you talking about? Getting a work visa might be easy, but getting permanent residency is far from easy... Also note we've deported on average 35 people a day. That's a lot for a country with 36 million people.. http://www.neverhome.ca/deportation/", '>>{chip_0} : [Wrong.](http://www.cic.gc.ca/ENGLISH/helpcentre/answer.asp?qnum=375&top=29) You can apply for residency three years after working on a work visa, shorter than most countries.', ">>{CGNer} : Yeah, you can APPLY. Don't mean shit though. Ask anyone going through the process... My friend JUST got his approval after 15 years (he's British) AND he's married to a Canadian gal...", '>>{chip_0} : Heh, countering your anecdotal evidence (perhaps your friend was jobless or something), I know tons of people who converted from work visas to PRs in the three years I lived in Canada. All of them worked in STEM fields, which may have helped them.', ">>{CGNer} : I'm not saying it's not possible. Most have bought their way in (which is what they are trying to slow down now). But that just means it's easy to immigrate to Canada if you have money or a very desirable skill. If you're a nobody, good luck. But that applies to the USA too. All our doctors immigrate to the USA for example. Better money and they can get green cards with little hassle...", '>>{chip_0} : For a STEM graduate (which is what this article is about), Canada is a good choice to immigrate to.', ">>{RHS59} : If voting made sure that the benefits of globalization weren't in the hands of the few, 99.9% of the programming, UX, web design, etc jobs wouldn't all be in California/ Nevada There'd be a western, southern, midwestern, and eastern tech hubs.", ">>{chip_0} : Why? Programmers tend to be young, liberal and from diverse backgrounds. California (or Seattle) is the best place to set up shop to attract such talent. There are tech jobs in the south and midwest, but they don't end up attracting as many folk.", '>>{RHS59} : If programmers tend to be young, liberal, and from diverse backgrounds, then what should the primarily white students from colleges like Iowa State University do with their STEM degrees? Move out to a state that has a high cost of living and conflicts with their values or somehow erect a new Silicon Valley out of thin air? Seems kinda unfair that you have to be either liberal, brown, a stem major or a combination of the three to get anywhere as a millenial.', ">>{chip_0} : > Move out to a state that has a high cost of living and conflicts with their values or somehow erect a new Silicon Valley out of thin air? Basically, yes. What do you want the government or the rest of us to do about it? Most people in the silicon valley moved there from elsewhere. > Seems kinda unfair that you have to be either liberal, brown, a stem major or a combination of the three to get anywhere as a millenial. You don't need to be liberal or brown but you definitely need to get used to working with plenty of liberal and brown folk. And yes, STEM skills are mandatory.", '>>{solartai} : I can open command prompt and play the star wars Easter egg, am I qualified to do STEM work?'], [">>{Arquette} : The New MacBook Pro: Will it solve the Apple laptop shopper's dilemma?", '>>{constantino2} : when apple figure out they could sell a $1000+ device to a casual user with ipads and airs, they lost interest in the productivity space...', '>>{evanstueve} : Yes and no. The latest 15" mbp with the radeon graphics chip is pretty decent still, but yeah I agree they could be making much bigger strides then they are on that front.', '>>{constantino2} : not saying their laptops are crap (just overpriced), but just offering a reason why they are not emphasizing their pro lineups.', ">>{jdgood} : According to Betteridge's law, no. What do most power (MBP) users want? Battery and horsepower. If the rumors are true Apple will most likely serve up an even slimmer MBP at the expense of battery and horsepower. I'm not thrilled at all at the prospect of another ATI MBP.", ">>{GoodKingLudericXII} : As a power user that's what I would want for work too. I got a Dell Precision laptop right now... It's thick, it's heavy, but it's powerful enough to run multiple VMs at once and got a decent battery. I couldn't be happier", ">>{riyoux} : I would use apple product's, especially the MacBook, but like everyone else I think they're way too overpriced. For $1300 I'm building a computer that can do so much more than a simple laptop.", '>>{hammerheadtiger} : You are paying a price for portability. This is true for all laptops. You just have to weight the benefits with the costs and if a self build is more your style, then you were never really in the market for a laptop to start with.', '>>{SpodermanWins} : Fuck cnet for autoplaying their shitty videos. This is the last time I open a cnet link.', '>>{illyndor} : > Battery and horsepower. Plus build quality and connectivity. For me, add a 17" screen.', '>>{jdgood} : > Plus build quality and connectivity. For me, add a 17" screen. I would have agreed with you once upon a time, but after taking my 2011 17" MBP with me as carry on, and on an inter-city train I can\'t. Being unable to properly view the screen or access the keyboard in the cramped quarters of a train/plane fails a 17" at it\'s primary purpose: of being a laptop. I would go for a 15" and docking-station/primary monitor.', '>>{tms10000} : And yet it would be entirely possible for Apple to bring back a 17" MBP without you being forced to buy one to travel on your inner city train.', '>>{juarmis} : For 1300$ you can buy an MSI laptop with a ssd, 32 gb ram, an i7 and a gtx 970m. Macbooks are for people who use design software, or any edition software at a pro level. Anyone else who buys a macbook is a hipster. You can get a better computer for average consumer tasks for the price.', ">>{JPN2214} : Built in Unix-like OS is a plus, although the newest Win10 update might solve that. (haven't tried it yet) How heavy/bulky is said MSI compared to the macbook?", '>>{JPN2214} : I want a MBP for Unix-like OS, and efficiency using pro design software. Sincerely, 90% satisfied Dell customer.', ">>{JPN2214} : Honestly I wish they'd make a text only website... Maybe I should use Firefox with reading mode. Does Edge include it as well these days?", '>>{Schnort} : > Yes and no. The latest 15" mbp with the radeon graphics chip is pretty decent still, but yeah I agree they could be making much bigger strides then they are on that front. The price, however, is ludicrous.', ">>{neoblackdragon} : What sucks is Designers think it's actually true. No folks, you don't need a Macbook to do design work. Adobe has long since provided great software for Windows and other vendors have long since provided a beefy portable machine. Seriously designers don't know why they need an Apple machine for their work. It's all, well in 2000 we used macs.", ">>{KeepItRealTV} : How would Win10 update solve that? Also, looking at Newegg, it looks like it's about 4.2 lbs. http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100167748%2050001312%20600536650%20600544982%20600004927", ">>{JPN2214} : The newest Win10 update builds in Ubuntu within Windows to an extent. Also, interesting! I'm not a huge fan of the look, but I can't argue with the specs in that shell.", ">>{KeepItRealTV} : > The newest Win10 update builds in Ubuntu within Windows to an extent. That's interesting. I guess I have to update to check it out then. Thanks for the info.", '>>{Aleblanco1987} : the biggest problem is that the macbook air and the macbook are too similar in what they bring to the table', ">>{hammerheadtiger} : You brought a specs argument to a portability discussion. There's no doubt you can get a more powerful computer for the money when you start to sacrifice weight and build materials. The laptop you mention is almost twice as heavy, almost twice as thick, plastic, has a much lower resolution membrane screen with no cover glass, and has a reported 1 hour of battery life while using the all specs you mention.", ">>{UpstairsNeighbor} : I'll occasionally defend Apple's pricing, but not this one. The fact that you have to *start* at $2500 to get a discreet GPU is ridiculous.", ">>{fourseven66} : It's not that they're necessary, it's that the way the OS is implemented tends to agree with people who have a creative background.", '>>{fourseven66} : This would be more true if the MacBook had more ports, or the Air had a retina display.', '>>{Aleblanco1987} : I mean the idea, before, the air was THE light and thin laptop, nos the macbook is taking its place. They should combine them in 1 product with 11 and 13 inch retina displays', ">>{fourseven66} : It's definitely a little messy right now. Clearly the Air is an awkward remnant right now, and will probably be discontinued soon.", '>>{Comma20} : Great music production devices pre-windows getting their sound drivers and stability together.', ">>{RedHeadedMenace} : Its got kernel level support for bash, and its own package manager. I haven't gotten to take a look at it yet, but if they nail this, I might be in love with my windows PC again.", '>>{KeepItRealTV} : Woah! I can write one script for Mac, Linux, and Windows natively?! Where has this been all my life?', '>>{Xalteox} : This really does frustrate me. I would consider Windows nice... If it were built with a Unix/Linux kernel like every other operating system. IIRC, Microsoft once tried to redesign their Kernel and failed miserably.', ">>{archaway} : I agree, I purchased my rMCB for three reasons: 1, I needed an i7 (quad core w/hyperthreading). 2, I didn't want dragon LED or aliens on it, I love the aesthetic of the Macbook, it looks profession, and 3, I wanted reliability.", '>>{archaway} : I think its inevitable that the new Macbook will evolve to have a few more ports and maybe a MicroSD card.', ">>{PM_ME_ALL_THE_BOOBIE} : It's more like they used Mac so much they are more comfortable with Mac than Windows. People who are used to something **really** don't like moving away from it.", '>>{MassiveFire} : Looking at the price i would rather build a pc and then hack a ups to cram as much lithium ion cells i can into it. Then i will ask my local iron smith to make a metal frame for my monitor and keyboard so that it resembles a lapdock.'], ['>>{fdsewswe} : Nancy Pelosi Claims Government Created the iPhone, Not Steve Jobs or Apple', ">>{Trumptron3000} : [Sounds like an *awfully* familiar line of reasoning from the Democrats.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IejjnZYvMF8) To expound further: all the parts used in the first useful steam engine existed individually for over a thousand years before its invention. That the government had a hand in creating the parts of some object does not give them any credit to its actual invention. edit: going further still, that's like me filling a crate with electromagnets, vacuum pumps, pressure chambers, microprocessors, an assortment of sensors, hydrogen tanks, and pluming, and claiming I'd invented a working fusion reactor. The arrangement of the parts is what matters for an invention.", ">>{jeff1323} : The government giving it's citizens a tool to make their lives easier? I think it'd cost a little bit more than $400 if it was made by the government.", ">>{lipsyncforyourlife} : Well without the government it wouldn't be what it is today. That being said this was a really really poor choice of words lmao", ">>{kdeff} : >In this smartphone, almost everything came from federal investments in research. Her point is true that many of the technologies came from government research. There would be no iPhone, internet, or even computers without government research. But no, they didn't create it; they created the technologies that enabled it to be created.", '>>{FavoriteCentaurMoe} : The government did literally invent the Internet though. She should have of focused on that.', ">>{websnarf} : She is referring to [this article](http://membercentral.aaas.org/blogs/scientia/iphone-brought-you-bardeen-shockley-and-brattain). But John Bardeen, William Shockley, and Walter Brattain all worked at Bell Labs in New Jersey, not the US government. So, I have no idea what she is talking about. The GPS point she is making, she is correct about. But I don't think she is correct on [any of the other points](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid-crystal_display#History).", '>>{habituallydiscarding} : Liz Warren is a big champion of this line of thinking.', '>>{xzerr} : Every invention stands on the shoulders of every innovation before it. No individual, company, government or civilization is soley responsible', ">>{OompaLoompaMAGA} : That's the quality post that I expect from DonsCons.", ">>{BelieveEnemie} : I'm not for any one. I'm just vehemently against anything establishment Democrat.", ">>{DoctrDeep} : The edit basically sums up the Google vs Oracle lawsuit where Oracle sued Google for using its API's in Android.", '>>{ModeratorPowertrip} : When was the last time Apple actually invented anything? Answer: [Never](https://youtu.be/wFeC25BM9E0)', '>>{Indictment_Day} : Even with that caveat, it is still not true.', ">>{Indictment_Day} : Between this moron and Elizabeth Warren, we will have Venezuela's economy in 4 years.", '>>{kdeff} : You, sir/maam, need to read up on the history of Military technology and the Space Race.', ">>{ModeratorPowertrip} : Yeah, except Apple doesn't invent anything... like... ever.", '>>{lucy99654} : Source for the original claims (which had little to do with the click-bait title of the article): http://www.aau.edu/research/smartphone.aspx', ">>{kdeff} : Sure, remain ignorant. Im sure you'll make good political and life choices.", ">>{Indictment_Day} : I've read the Bible; Jesus created the iphone.", ">>{cool_hand_luke} : Apple claims to have invented it, and they're wrong too.", '>>{EllisHughTiger} : The govt and other companies laid the groundwork and basics of the Internet, but the rest of the market actually took it and made it what it is today. Govt funded research creates a lot of stuff, but often little is done until some companies can find a way to make it marketable and profitable.', ">>{ThouHastLostAn8th} : > this was a really really poor choice of words Those weren't her words, they're crunchbace.co's click-bait paraphrasing. She never even said the word iPhone, she talked about smartphone's generically, and what technologies they depend on came from government investments in technology and science.", '>>{atchijov} : Jesus created Android. This is why there are so many versions of it. iPhone is more of Buda product. Single interpretation (disclaimer, I am not an expert on Buddhism).', ">>{violentintenttoday} : Well of course she does, how else can they justify cranking up the corporate tax rate in the US that is already the second highest in the world behind Japan? You didn't do that. Someone else made that happen", ">>{violentintenttoday} : the innovations Apple does make are hard to quantify. Like there is no such thing as an iPod, but you know as soon as you have one in your hand what an iPod is and how it's not the same thing as a creative labs mp3 player. It's not worth the price difference in my mind, but I understand what apple's innovation is.", '>>{atsugnam} : Tim Berners Lee worked at CERN when http was invented, prior to that there was no real Internet as you see it today.', '>>{violentintenttoday} : Claiming all research coming out of universities as "government" by Pelosi is a bit of a stretch. It\'s almost as bad as Obama\'s "If you have a small business you didn\'t build it because at some point somewhere some government employee was a teacher or a mentor or whatever" disaster. Also, like the article said, a lot of the components came from the private sector', ">>{violentintenttoday} : Are you for real? is this some kind of trolling attempt where you do the thing you're calling someone else on?", ">>{ModeratorPowertrip} : Of course. Apple makes the world a better place. They just don't invent new technology. They modify and enhance the technology that other companies invent.", '>>{buckyVanBuren} : CERN was the birthplace of the World Wide Web.', '>>{RagingCain} : And markup the cost approximately another 200-500% to consumers who will essentially argue for that extra value/premium. Now that we can install OSX on custom built PCs, there are alternatives finally.', '>>{hybridanimal} : Define "invent" and I think you\'ll find this is most companies.', ">>{formerprof} : US drugs and tech are often created with tax payer funds. They are then given or sold for a pittance to private companies who charge the tax payer for use of the product. China's Stae run enterprises and state-private partnerships do a much better job of ensuring that the public continues to get the benefit of research funded at state expense.", '>>{RVA2DC} : Previously, the vast majority of public university funding was provided by, well the public (a.k.a. the government). When the advances in technology took place that allow for the iPhone to exist (such as those in the article you commented on), this was certainly the case. So if an entity receives >50% of its funding from the government, what would you call the research they do? Private?', ">>{ScreamingUpAtUs} : But it wouldn't have become a product available for global consumption without the market.", '>>{ModeratorPowertrip} : I mean... this is true for most companies. Walmart doesn\'t tend to invent stuff. McDonald\'s doesn\'t tend to invent things. Target holds few patents... But most tech companies invent things and aren\'t claiming "curved edges" and "wedge shaped" laptops. Those are the only "inventions" Apple believes it invented, and it\'s a disgrace.', ">>{hybridanimal} : I was speaking specifically of tech companies, but I disagree with the notion that 'most tech companies invent things' and I've never seen Apple claim to invent either of those things.", ">>{LCDRDATASBIGROBOCOCK} : Remember everyone to a statist all good and wonderful things flow from government control. Nothing good ever comes from the citizens, their hard work and effort, their willingness to work with others free of coersion, and the risks they take with their personal wealth. You can only succeed with government, you can't do it on your own, you didn't build that, etc.", '>>{hybridanimal} : Having a patent ≠ claiming to invent. You can disagree with their patents/lawsuits and the patenting process in general but my point still stands.', '>>{ModeratorPowertrip} : > Having a patent ≠ claiming to invent False. Your point is based in ignorance.', ">>{_pixie_} : Yea that's what she said ;) not that they 'created' the iPhone. You should write titles.", ">>{websnarf} : > Her point is true that many of the technologies came from government research. No, it's not. The LCD, touch screen, the material science for all the chips and so on inside the phone, Siri's voice recognition and AI, and all the software was not largely government sponsored. GPS and the internet are the only two things you can seriously cite as being products of federal funding. > There would be no iPhone, internet, or even computers without government research. Well ok, that's utter nonsense. All of those things would have existed, but likely have taken on different forms, and most decidedly have had a different history. But some version of it would have existed even if it came about as a result of purely private ventures. We know this because most of it did.", '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems, or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems, or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{websnarf} : OMG ... If I had the energy, I would rip that presentation to shreds. Just an example: John Atanasoff made exactly 0 contributions to the concept of a CPU. You could delete him from history, and the development of computers would be absolutely unchanged. Crediting J. Presper Eckert and Mauchly is also a serious exaggeration. The Harvard Mark I was completed earlier. Nearly all the other things they show suffer from similar "anti-historical" problems or were not results of government funding.', '>>{atsugnam} : And http, you know the first half of the protocol the Internet is built on...']]

classify and reply

[">>{I_Am_A_TRex} : garbage article that doesn't fact check: >He insisted on grandstanding in Baton Rouge, only to be told off by the governor and exclude the press anyway. though he changed his tune right here: http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/article_cbc57fa4-67aa-11e6-8465-b33f701bb9b8.html give me a break WAPO, do your job and respect journalism standards instead of editorializing the shit out of everything you report.", '>>{mcthornbody420} : CNN was told to back off on reporting about the unrest in Bahrain. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/sep/04/cnn-international-documentary-bahrain-arab-spring-repression', '>>{n0ahbody} : Donald Trump Is Bringing President Obama’s Half-Brother to the Third Debate', '>>{sjwsownworldnews} : ---attn: social media corrections: alert: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4z3rfr/emails_show_clinton_foundation_donor_reached_out/ downvotes +bonus for commentary: scale2-3 comps:More garbage that fails fact checks, give us a break WAPO. LAME.', '>>{Roseking} : It is funny how they say people must be paid because they are on every post and see no irony that they are also on every post.', '>>{NateGrey} : > Now he tells the New York Post he is “excited” to attend the debate in Las Vegas and believes Trump “can make America Great Again.” Trump tells the Post his guest “gets it far better than his brother.” The Trump campaign confirmed to TIME that Malik would be the candidate’s guest. Have we finally gone full BreitBart/Alex Jones?', '>>{AsianCanadianMan} : Hillary supporters live in a fantasy world which they believe us Canadians stand behind them a 100% well you need to wake up http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/why-this-mexican-couple-with-3-canadian-born-children-faces-deportation-1.3821190 http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/woman-facing-deportation-issues-plea-to-stay-in-canada-1.3123894 http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/citizenship-revocation-trudeau-harper-1.3795733', ">>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : Even if conservative's worst theories on Clinton were true and confirmed, she would still beat Trump in a landslide.", '>>{intheminority} : OMG, what an incredible power play! Donald is such a nimble navigator. /s', ">>{Tekbepimpin} : After Ochoa's arrest, neighbours stepped up to help. One of them took in Trueba and her children and found her a lawyer. Another neighbour, together with their landlord of 11 years, paid Ochoa's $5,000 bail along with a $10,000 bond. - ? Horrible people these Canadians", ">>{houdinitv} : The State Department is sorting through 14,900 documents to determine which ones contain sensitive government information and which are strictly personal conversations. The emails could be released as early as mid-October, just a couple weeks before the November election between the Democratic nominee and Mr. Trump. Whoever is satisfied with those facts is a patsy. There should be no reason for the State Department to need months to edit these emails. Hillary and her crowd supposedly already did so, and all that's in them is yoga routines.", '>>{sphere2040} : Clinton should bring the Kitchen sink! We should get the \\#kitchensink trending tomorrow.', '>>{buckeye_baker} : > Malik told the Post he does not believe the women who have come forward to accuse Trump of sexual misconduct, asking, “Why didn’t they come forward before?” Yep, checks out as a Trump supporter.', ">>{WhyDoges} : Trump knows that his brother is an asshole that has nothing in common with Obama ideologically too right? Also that you know he's not related to Clinton.", '>>{zorrocaven2} : Surprise HRC...further evidence that YOUR Foundation was involved with your Sec of State office in getting favors and special treatment.....and you think by simply telling us that YOU did not do it....like Capone telling the Court he had nothing to do with his top Lt taking out an opponent or a none-payer of loan sharking....and thinking Capone was so innocent. Clinton and her family of criminals are running a pay-for-play and going thru an appointed under-boss does not remove the racketeering from the intended operation and the goals desired. The more these emails show this the more the sticky amber sticks to her.....and she will be tied to it all.', ">>{TripleDoug} : Don't you think it is sad that people only want others to see one side of the story? Who wants to shelter people from other views and perspectives. No good idea, individual, business, perspective etc... wants to hold hostage your knowledge and focus. Those who take away yours, or others agency even if they suggest they do it for your sake, or the sake of others are evil, because that act is an evil one. If you don't like the succintness of evil, replace it with nefarious, malevolent etc etc.", ">>{AsianCanadianMan} : I am Canadian I know we are good people lol, the point I want to make is that we have our immigration policies too. People get denied access or deported from this country everyday. but I'm sure many Hillary supporters in their fantasy world don't think that way.", '>>{DC25NYC} : If somehow this asshole became president what would he do meeting diplomats. "Donald trump brings Kim Jong Un to meeting with Xi Jinping, hoping to rattle him"', ">>{CommanderKerbal} : Barry's brother reminds me of Jazz from Fresh Prince.", '>>{Roseking} : Where did you get the impression that I want to only see one side of the story? There is a reason I normally sort by new here. I was making a joke that people are saying CRT because they think there is a group of people being paid to watch for new and downvote , while they themselves sit on every new post. Edit: Screw this. You post in the_donald and dare lecture someone about sheltering people from the other side of the story?', '>>{I_AM_shill} : Trump is spending no effort online. Where is this coming from?', '>>{MegaSansIX} : Canada is still giving the children birthright citizenship. Trump wants to get rid of birthright citizenship which would not only affect the children of illegal immigrants but nonwhites in general since the 14th amendment is the only reason nonwhites can be American citizens. That means 45% of all Americans under 30 are no longer citizens', ">>{Tekbepimpin} : Link to trump saying he's going to remove birthright citizenship? Pretty sure it's unconstitutional.", '>>{zstream41} : Picture this. It\'s July 2nd. HC delivered to FBI on silver platter. Comey poised to stick fork in her; he\'s sure she\'s done. Timing tactics surpassed only by irony—country too busy with fetes, fireworks and freedom-from-monarchical-oppression to notice. Clintons sweat interview. HC—a Martha-Stewart sitting duck—is facing what is known in game theory as Morton\'s Fork—jail or jail—perjury or self-incrimination. Now picture this. That is not what went down… Comey\'s sworn testimony to Congress based on his FBI probe: —All HC public statements regarding her emails were lies.—(See Comey responses to Gowdy.) —FBI had “no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI” during her interview. (NB: ≠ "she told truth") The only way both Comey statements can be true is if HC wasn\'t asked any relevant questions or if HC refused to answer all relevant questions or if HC confessed to her crimes. (NB: When HC is cornered, she typically takes functional 5th—"I don\'t recall" & multifarious variations—to mitigate Mafia meme.) Purpose of LL-BC tarmac tête-à-tête: Establish means to protect HC from Morton\'s Fork, i.e., perjury or self-incrimination. They chose functional-5th route, no-incriminating-questions route, or some combination thereof. NB: —All options constitute an FBI-DOJ-Clinton conspiracy to protect HC from prosecution. —Conveniently for Clinton/FBI/DOJ, no recordings of interview exist. —302 report being submitted is prone to convenient error/revisionism. —FBI-DOJ 302 credo: “If it isn’t in writing, it doesn’t exist.”', '>>{zoeing} : The countless articles on how Trump is spending his campaign finances?', '>>{buckeye_baker} : Not to mention the stupidity of thinking this will rattle Hillary... what the fuck would she care?', '>>{DC25NYC} : Hell its ammo "Donald, further proof you can\'t accept the fact our president is American. Stop this circus show"', ">>{theZcuber} : Well, it's the 14th amendment, so it would take an amendment to undo it.", '>>{n0ahbody} : Breaking News: Donald Trump brings Rodrigo Duterte to stand in the background, looking on menacingly, as Trump negotiates a trade deal with Taiwan.', ">>{MegaSansIX} : http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08/17/trump-calls-for-deportation-illegal-immigrants-end-to-birthright-citizenship.html It's not unconstitutional to remove an amendment. If he has enough support in Congress he can have the 14th Amendment repealed.", '>>{spolio} : omg that is exactly what this election is like, the WWF', '>>{thrshe4} : He seems to think that everyone is as much of an easily-rattled, thin-skinned crybaby as he is.', ">>{ozabelle} : will malik vouch for obama's kenyan birth certificate? the suspense is killing me", ">>{n0ahbody} : Fuck the debate. I'm not going. Instead, I challenge Hillary Clinton to a wrestling match, at Madison Square Garden! I dare Hillary to defeat me! Betcha she's chicken! B'gAWk! B'GawK! She's WEAK! I'll friggin' destroy her. And she knows it! She probably can't even climb into the ring. I am the greatest!!!", ">>{Tekbepimpin} : Ehh I'll read it but August 2015... he removed a bunch of stuff from his website today. Could be replaced with worse stuff but my feeling middle America is about to be real disappointed.", ">>{AsianCanadianMan} : In Canada we don't give any leniency to foreign nationals https://www.thestar.com/business/2016/10/17/chinese-property-mogul-wants-to-speak-to-trudeau-about-bc-foreign-buyers-tax.html for example I'm Chinese Canadian, a citizen therefore I don't have to pay this extra tax when buying a property. This specific tax is directed at non citizen Chinese mainly from mainland China. You can't be angry at the policies just because you are a minority. What Trump is doing is in the best interests for the citizens of America. Just like the property tax here in Vancouver", '>>{Kanzisbuddy} : All Trump is doing is telling everyone he will use any distraction to avoid talking about the real issues in this election.', ">>{d3fi4nt} : Anyone know whether there's much of a case to say the PACs and campaign have been coordinating based on Allida Black's relationship between her and Hillary during the campaign whilst apparently also working with the PACs and being paid via a certain PAC specifically.. http://sli.mg/dAMY3Z.jpg ?", '>>{HRCs_stinky_pussy} : Not all of us think "anchor babies" should be citizens.', ">>{MegaSansIX} : Eliminating the 14th amendment wouldn't simply affect recent immigrants. Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, Equal Protection, and so much more would be lost with it", '>>{Claritypleas} : Well, Trump has had experience appearing in the WWF, after all.', '>>{MegaSansIX} : Should nonwhites have citizenship? Should we also do away with abortion even if it means some women will die?', '>>{MakeAmericaGravyGun} : Why would Clinton care? And more importantly, considering that Malik Obama says he supports Trump because he hates that Barack Obama and Clinton killed his "good friend" Gaddafi, isn\'t this a terrible idea? (Rhetorical question; obviously it\'s terrible.) Trump is bringing even more focus on his support for tyrants.', ">>{n0ahbody} : Lol, now I'm imagining Trump doing his Inauguration like that, getting escorted to the podium by a couple of scantily clad bimbos.", ">>{TripleDoug} : I think you get comments like 3,2,1 because if you sort the topics you see a clear agenda. My point is CTR or not you have to wonder why people don't want others to see positions different from their own. However there have been some pretty clear transitions for r/pol this year, and money coming into CTR sure coincides. I don't think it is a fluke. Hell I don't bother to downvote unless something is factually or logically an issue. People are entitled to their opions. Downvoting truth seems awfully pathetic and inherently wrong.", ">>{HRCs_stinky_pussy} : nonwhites that are here legally, of course. whites that are here illegally, of course not. It's not a racial issue.", '>>{TheDevilsHorn} : I really wonder what Obama is thinking about this. I can just imagine all the phone calls his family must be making.', ">>{KatsThoughts} : God almighty, who else is on the list? Michelle Obama's prom date? The girl who beat out Chelsea Clinton for the lead in the school play?", ">>{n0ahbody} : Jimmy 'Superfly' Snuka, Clint Eastwood, and Oliver North.", '>>{stndost2} : It\'s assuring and satisfied to see and read at least one main media is telling another side of the story of Majesty Hillary. ibtimes, well done. Don\'t follow into NYT, CNN, Washington Post and the rest of getting into "partisan" journalism. All media should have the responsibilities to adopt fair and balanced news reporting.', '>>{KatsThoughts} : OMG! Literally what if Trump points to him and is like, "I have brought a man here tonight, Obama\'s brother in law, who is here to tell the American people... that Obama was born in Kenya once and for all, thank you." /drops mic', '>>{KatsThoughts} : Seriously. Is Trump\'s thought, "Being a birther got me this far... my polls started tanking and the media turned against me when I gave that press conference admitting Obama was born in the US... I\'m going back to Kenya, baby."', '>>{NateSilverMDMA} : Hey check out these bots you can get! https://redditbot.codeplex.com/ "A simple yet efficient Down-vote Bot for reddit." This one too: http://sadiqk.com/reddit-upvotedownvote-bot/ Reddit Upvote/Downvote Bot The Python script is pretty straight forward; it upvotes (or downvotes if you modify line #21) all the submissions and comments of a target user then gives you the total number of upvoted/downvoted posts when it’s done.', '>>{KatsThoughts} : Clint Eastwood has been giving Donald debate prep tips on how to appropriately interact with a chair.', '>>{MasonJarBong} : Donald Trump thrives on attention. He craves it just as he has all his life, as it was most likely withheld by his father. And just like a child, he will make an ass of himself to garner said attention.', ">>{mcthornbody420} : Too bad a lot of democrats are busy doing social justice work, can't read or are busy slinging dope. The other 1% make good money making sure the others stay the way they are. Oh if you want to make a anti clinton post on reddit, include NSA in the post... it's like raid to the CTR.", '>>{malpais} : Last week: >Band was writing to Hillary Clinton\'s aides on behalf of Gilbert Chagoury, a Nigerian billionaire of Lebanese descent who had donated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation. Band wanted some help — quickly. "We need Gilbert Chagoury to speak to the substance person re Lebanon. Abedin replied a few hours later that the right person at State was Jeff Feltman, the recent ambassador to Lebanon serving as an assistant secretary of state.   >**As it turned out, Feltman said he never connected with the billionaire. “Gilbert Chagoury never contacted me,” he said in response to a question Wednesday from The Washington Post. “I have never met nor spoken to him. No one ever told me he was seeking me out.”**   This week: >Another exchange shows Band requesting that Clinton help smooth the visa process for a member of the Wolverhampton Wanderers Football Club, from the United Kingdom, who was struggling because of a “criminal charge.” The request came from Casey Wasserman, president of the Wasserman Foundation, which has donated between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. >But Clinton’s office did not comply with the request. Abedin said it “makes me nervous to get involved but I’ll ask.” Band replied, “Then don’t.” >**The request never resulted in a visa, a spokeswoman for Wasserman told The Hill.**', '>>{chadcf} : I think that was pretty apparent with: > Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of US sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends, and her donors. The only thing he has yet to do is accuse Clinton of being a secret reptilian overlord.', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : Wow. Just wow. CNN spends a ton on a solid expose that the world deserved to see and it is quashed with no reason ever given to the reporter involved. And now we find out this: HRC connection to Bahrain. This looks bad, really bad. CF gets donations then she used her influence as SoS to suppress news coverage of their attempted revolution, and arms deals. This is treason.', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : >In a statement quoted by the Wall Street Journal, a Clinton spokesperson, Josh Schwerin, said of the newly released correspondence: “The fact remains that Hillary Clinton never took action as secretary of state because of donations to the Clinton Foundation.” So this was someone on her team - on her side making that admission? How is this not treason? She put personal interests (CF) above those of the USA. She needs to be behind bars!!', ">>{mcthornbody420} : It's a nothingburger. I mean that reporter had to go to alex jones to expose them since she was blackballed. Which makes her look even more crazy. Was a solid interview on her part. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGDVzJNMKs8 NSA", ">>{ardogalen} : Arms exports have increased generally under Obama with some of the largest recipients being Gulf States like Bahrain, which is essentially a puppet of Saudi Arabia. They are not some sort of corruption but rather reflect the US government's misguided notion that Saudi Arabia and its allies must be supported against Iranian influence. Bahrain, it should be noted, has a significant Shiite population who were scapegoated by pro-government supporters for the unrest in 2011 and the continued problems in the country with many claiming that the unrest was an Iranian plot.", ">>{PerniciousPeyton} : > Don't you think it is sad that people only want others to see one side of the story? Who wants to shelter people from other views and perspectives. Try telling that to r/the_donald", '>>{PerniciousPeyton} : Agreed, a film of Clinton eating a live puppy would have to surface just to cut her 8 point lead in Pennsylvania *in half*.']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{AsianCanadianMan} : Hillary supporters live in a fantasy world which they believe us Canadians stand behind them a 100% well you need to wake up http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/why-this-mexican-couple-with-3-canadian-born-children-faces-deportation-1.3821190 http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/woman-facing-deportation-issues-plea-to-stay-in-canada-1.3123894 http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/citizenship-revocation-trudeau-harper-1.3795733', ">>{Tekbepimpin} : After Ochoa's arrest, neighbours stepped up to help. One of them took in Trueba and her children and found her a lawyer. Another neighbour, together with their landlord of 11 years, paid Ochoa's $5,000 bail along with a $10,000 bond. - ? Horrible people these Canadians", ">>{AsianCanadianMan} : I am Canadian I know we are good people lol, the point I want to make is that we have our immigration policies too. People get denied access or deported from this country everyday. but I'm sure many Hillary supporters in their fantasy world don't think that way.", '>>{MegaSansIX} : Canada is still giving the children birthright citizenship. Trump wants to get rid of birthright citizenship which would not only affect the children of illegal immigrants but nonwhites in general since the 14th amendment is the only reason nonwhites can be American citizens. That means 45% of all Americans under 30 are no longer citizens', ">>{Tekbepimpin} : Link to trump saying he's going to remove birthright citizenship? Pretty sure it's unconstitutional.", ">>{theZcuber} : Well, it's the 14th amendment, so it would take an amendment to undo it.", ">>{MegaSansIX} : http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08/17/trump-calls-for-deportation-illegal-immigrants-end-to-birthright-citizenship.html It's not unconstitutional to remove an amendment. If he has enough support in Congress he can have the 14th Amendment repealed.", ">>{Tekbepimpin} : Ehh I'll read it but August 2015... he removed a bunch of stuff from his website today. Could be replaced with worse stuff but my feeling middle America is about to be real disappointed.", ">>{AsianCanadianMan} : In Canada we don't give any leniency to foreign nationals https://www.thestar.com/business/2016/10/17/chinese-property-mogul-wants-to-speak-to-trudeau-about-bc-foreign-buyers-tax.html for example I'm Chinese Canadian, a citizen therefore I don't have to pay this extra tax when buying a property. This specific tax is directed at non citizen Chinese mainly from mainland China. You can't be angry at the policies just because you are a minority. What Trump is doing is in the best interests for the citizens of America. Just like the property tax here in Vancouver", '>>{HRCs_stinky_pussy} : Not all of us think "anchor babies" should be citizens.', ">>{MegaSansIX} : Eliminating the 14th amendment wouldn't simply affect recent immigrants. Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, Equal Protection, and so much more would be lost with it", '>>{MegaSansIX} : Should nonwhites have citizenship? Should we also do away with abortion even if it means some women will die?', ">>{HRCs_stinky_pussy} : nonwhites that are here legally, of course. whites that are here illegally, of course not. It's not a racial issue."], ['>>{n0ahbody} : Donald Trump Is Bringing President Obama’s Half-Brother to the Third Debate', '>>{NateGrey} : > Now he tells the New York Post he is “excited” to attend the debate in Las Vegas and believes Trump “can make America Great Again.” Trump tells the Post his guest “gets it far better than his brother.” The Trump campaign confirmed to TIME that Malik would be the candidate’s guest. Have we finally gone full BreitBart/Alex Jones?', '>>{intheminority} : OMG, what an incredible power play! Donald is such a nimble navigator. /s', '>>{sphere2040} : Clinton should bring the Kitchen sink! We should get the \\#kitchensink trending tomorrow.', '>>{buckeye_baker} : > Malik told the Post he does not believe the women who have come forward to accuse Trump of sexual misconduct, asking, “Why didn’t they come forward before?” Yep, checks out as a Trump supporter.', ">>{WhyDoges} : Trump knows that his brother is an asshole that has nothing in common with Obama ideologically too right? Also that you know he's not related to Clinton.", '>>{DC25NYC} : If somehow this asshole became president what would he do meeting diplomats. "Donald trump brings Kim Jong Un to meeting with Xi Jinping, hoping to rattle him"', ">>{CommanderKerbal} : Barry's brother reminds me of Jazz from Fresh Prince.", '>>{buckeye_baker} : Not to mention the stupidity of thinking this will rattle Hillary... what the fuck would she care?', '>>{DC25NYC} : Hell its ammo "Donald, further proof you can\'t accept the fact our president is American. Stop this circus show"', '>>{n0ahbody} : Breaking News: Donald Trump brings Rodrigo Duterte to stand in the background, looking on menacingly, as Trump negotiates a trade deal with Taiwan.', '>>{spolio} : omg that is exactly what this election is like, the WWF', '>>{thrshe4} : He seems to think that everyone is as much of an easily-rattled, thin-skinned crybaby as he is.', ">>{ozabelle} : will malik vouch for obama's kenyan birth certificate? the suspense is killing me", ">>{n0ahbody} : Fuck the debate. I'm not going. Instead, I challenge Hillary Clinton to a wrestling match, at Madison Square Garden! I dare Hillary to defeat me! Betcha she's chicken! B'gAWk! B'GawK! She's WEAK! I'll friggin' destroy her. And she knows it! She probably can't even climb into the ring. I am the greatest!!!", '>>{Kanzisbuddy} : All Trump is doing is telling everyone he will use any distraction to avoid talking about the real issues in this election.', '>>{Claritypleas} : Well, Trump has had experience appearing in the WWF, after all.', '>>{MakeAmericaGravyGun} : Why would Clinton care? And more importantly, considering that Malik Obama says he supports Trump because he hates that Barack Obama and Clinton killed his "good friend" Gaddafi, isn\'t this a terrible idea? (Rhetorical question; obviously it\'s terrible.) Trump is bringing even more focus on his support for tyrants.', ">>{n0ahbody} : Lol, now I'm imagining Trump doing his Inauguration like that, getting escorted to the podium by a couple of scantily clad bimbos.", '>>{TheDevilsHorn} : I really wonder what Obama is thinking about this. I can just imagine all the phone calls his family must be making.', ">>{KatsThoughts} : God almighty, who else is on the list? Michelle Obama's prom date? The girl who beat out Chelsea Clinton for the lead in the school play?", ">>{n0ahbody} : Jimmy 'Superfly' Snuka, Clint Eastwood, and Oliver North.", '>>{KatsThoughts} : OMG! Literally what if Trump points to him and is like, "I have brought a man here tonight, Obama\'s brother in law, who is here to tell the American people... that Obama was born in Kenya once and for all, thank you." /drops mic', '>>{KatsThoughts} : Seriously. Is Trump\'s thought, "Being a birther got me this far... my polls started tanking and the media turned against me when I gave that press conference admitting Obama was born in the US... I\'m going back to Kenya, baby."', '>>{KatsThoughts} : Clint Eastwood has been giving Donald debate prep tips on how to appropriately interact with a chair.', '>>{MasonJarBong} : Donald Trump thrives on attention. He craves it just as he has all his life, as it was most likely withheld by his father. And just like a child, he will make an ass of himself to garner said attention.', '>>{chadcf} : I think that was pretty apparent with: > Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of US sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends, and her donors. The only thing he has yet to do is accuse Clinton of being a secret reptilian overlord.'], [">>{I_Am_A_TRex} : garbage article that doesn't fact check: >He insisted on grandstanding in Baton Rouge, only to be told off by the governor and exclude the press anyway. though he changed his tune right here: http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/politics/article_cbc57fa4-67aa-11e6-8465-b33f701bb9b8.html give me a break WAPO, do your job and respect journalism standards instead of editorializing the shit out of everything you report.", '>>{mcthornbody420} : CNN was told to back off on reporting about the unrest in Bahrain. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/sep/04/cnn-international-documentary-bahrain-arab-spring-repression', '>>{sjwsownworldnews} : ---attn: social media corrections: alert: https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4z3rfr/emails_show_clinton_foundation_donor_reached_out/ downvotes +bonus for commentary: scale2-3 comps:More garbage that fails fact checks, give us a break WAPO. LAME.', '>>{Roseking} : It is funny how they say people must be paid because they are on every post and see no irony that they are also on every post.', ">>{chinchilla-khaleesi} : Even if conservative's worst theories on Clinton were true and confirmed, she would still beat Trump in a landslide.", ">>{houdinitv} : The State Department is sorting through 14,900 documents to determine which ones contain sensitive government information and which are strictly personal conversations. The emails could be released as early as mid-October, just a couple weeks before the November election between the Democratic nominee and Mr. Trump. Whoever is satisfied with those facts is a patsy. There should be no reason for the State Department to need months to edit these emails. Hillary and her crowd supposedly already did so, and all that's in them is yoga routines.", '>>{zorrocaven2} : Surprise HRC...further evidence that YOUR Foundation was involved with your Sec of State office in getting favors and special treatment.....and you think by simply telling us that YOU did not do it....like Capone telling the Court he had nothing to do with his top Lt taking out an opponent or a none-payer of loan sharking....and thinking Capone was so innocent. Clinton and her family of criminals are running a pay-for-play and going thru an appointed under-boss does not remove the racketeering from the intended operation and the goals desired. The more these emails show this the more the sticky amber sticks to her.....and she will be tied to it all.', ">>{TripleDoug} : Don't you think it is sad that people only want others to see one side of the story? Who wants to shelter people from other views and perspectives. No good idea, individual, business, perspective etc... wants to hold hostage your knowledge and focus. Those who take away yours, or others agency even if they suggest they do it for your sake, or the sake of others are evil, because that act is an evil one. If you don't like the succintness of evil, replace it with nefarious, malevolent etc etc.", '>>{Roseking} : Where did you get the impression that I want to only see one side of the story? There is a reason I normally sort by new here. I was making a joke that people are saying CRT because they think there is a group of people being paid to watch for new and downvote , while they themselves sit on every new post. Edit: Screw this. You post in the_donald and dare lecture someone about sheltering people from the other side of the story?', '>>{I_AM_shill} : Trump is spending no effort online. Where is this coming from?', '>>{zstream41} : Picture this. It\'s July 2nd. HC delivered to FBI on silver platter. Comey poised to stick fork in her; he\'s sure she\'s done. Timing tactics surpassed only by irony—country too busy with fetes, fireworks and freedom-from-monarchical-oppression to notice. Clintons sweat interview. HC—a Martha-Stewart sitting duck—is facing what is known in game theory as Morton\'s Fork—jail or jail—perjury or self-incrimination. Now picture this. That is not what went down… Comey\'s sworn testimony to Congress based on his FBI probe: —All HC public statements regarding her emails were lies.—(See Comey responses to Gowdy.) —FBI had “no basis to conclude she lied to the FBI” during her interview. (NB: ≠ "she told truth") The only way both Comey statements can be true is if HC wasn\'t asked any relevant questions or if HC refused to answer all relevant questions or if HC confessed to her crimes. (NB: When HC is cornered, she typically takes functional 5th—"I don\'t recall" & multifarious variations—to mitigate Mafia meme.) Purpose of LL-BC tarmac tête-à-tête: Establish means to protect HC from Morton\'s Fork, i.e., perjury or self-incrimination. They chose functional-5th route, no-incriminating-questions route, or some combination thereof. NB: —All options constitute an FBI-DOJ-Clinton conspiracy to protect HC from prosecution. —Conveniently for Clinton/FBI/DOJ, no recordings of interview exist. —302 report being submitted is prone to convenient error/revisionism. —FBI-DOJ 302 credo: “If it isn’t in writing, it doesn’t exist.”', '>>{zoeing} : The countless articles on how Trump is spending his campaign finances?', ">>{d3fi4nt} : Anyone know whether there's much of a case to say the PACs and campaign have been coordinating based on Allida Black's relationship between her and Hillary during the campaign whilst apparently also working with the PACs and being paid via a certain PAC specifically.. http://sli.mg/dAMY3Z.jpg ?", ">>{TripleDoug} : I think you get comments like 3,2,1 because if you sort the topics you see a clear agenda. My point is CTR or not you have to wonder why people don't want others to see positions different from their own. However there have been some pretty clear transitions for r/pol this year, and money coming into CTR sure coincides. I don't think it is a fluke. Hell I don't bother to downvote unless something is factually or logically an issue. People are entitled to their opions. Downvoting truth seems awfully pathetic and inherently wrong.", '>>{stndost2} : It\'s assuring and satisfied to see and read at least one main media is telling another side of the story of Majesty Hillary. ibtimes, well done. Don\'t follow into NYT, CNN, Washington Post and the rest of getting into "partisan" journalism. All media should have the responsibilities to adopt fair and balanced news reporting.', '>>{NateSilverMDMA} : Hey check out these bots you can get! https://redditbot.codeplex.com/ "A simple yet efficient Down-vote Bot for reddit." This one too: http://sadiqk.com/reddit-upvotedownvote-bot/ Reddit Upvote/Downvote Bot The Python script is pretty straight forward; it upvotes (or downvotes if you modify line #21) all the submissions and comments of a target user then gives you the total number of upvoted/downvoted posts when it’s done.', ">>{mcthornbody420} : Too bad a lot of democrats are busy doing social justice work, can't read or are busy slinging dope. The other 1% make good money making sure the others stay the way they are. Oh if you want to make a anti clinton post on reddit, include NSA in the post... it's like raid to the CTR.", '>>{malpais} : Last week: >Band was writing to Hillary Clinton\'s aides on behalf of Gilbert Chagoury, a Nigerian billionaire of Lebanese descent who had donated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation. Band wanted some help — quickly. "We need Gilbert Chagoury to speak to the substance person re Lebanon. Abedin replied a few hours later that the right person at State was Jeff Feltman, the recent ambassador to Lebanon serving as an assistant secretary of state.   >**As it turned out, Feltman said he never connected with the billionaire. “Gilbert Chagoury never contacted me,” he said in response to a question Wednesday from The Washington Post. “I have never met nor spoken to him. No one ever told me he was seeking me out.”**   This week: >Another exchange shows Band requesting that Clinton help smooth the visa process for a member of the Wolverhampton Wanderers Football Club, from the United Kingdom, who was struggling because of a “criminal charge.” The request came from Casey Wasserman, president of the Wasserman Foundation, which has donated between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. >But Clinton’s office did not comply with the request. Abedin said it “makes me nervous to get involved but I’ll ask.” Band replied, “Then don’t.” >**The request never resulted in a visa, a spokeswoman for Wasserman told The Hill.**', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : Wow. Just wow. CNN spends a ton on a solid expose that the world deserved to see and it is quashed with no reason ever given to the reporter involved. And now we find out this: HRC connection to Bahrain. This looks bad, really bad. CF gets donations then she used her influence as SoS to suppress news coverage of their attempted revolution, and arms deals. This is treason.', '>>{SchlangeHatRecht} : >In a statement quoted by the Wall Street Journal, a Clinton spokesperson, Josh Schwerin, said of the newly released correspondence: “The fact remains that Hillary Clinton never took action as secretary of state because of donations to the Clinton Foundation.” So this was someone on her team - on her side making that admission? How is this not treason? She put personal interests (CF) above those of the USA. She needs to be behind bars!!', ">>{mcthornbody420} : It's a nothingburger. I mean that reporter had to go to alex jones to expose them since she was blackballed. Which makes her look even more crazy. Was a solid interview on her part. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGDVzJNMKs8 NSA", ">>{ardogalen} : Arms exports have increased generally under Obama with some of the largest recipients being Gulf States like Bahrain, which is essentially a puppet of Saudi Arabia. They are not some sort of corruption but rather reflect the US government's misguided notion that Saudi Arabia and its allies must be supported against Iranian influence. Bahrain, it should be noted, has a significant Shiite population who were scapegoated by pro-government supporters for the unrest in 2011 and the continued problems in the country with many claiming that the unrest was an Iranian plot.", ">>{PerniciousPeyton} : > Don't you think it is sad that people only want others to see one side of the story? Who wants to shelter people from other views and perspectives. Try telling that to r/the_donald", '>>{PerniciousPeyton} : Agreed, a film of Clinton eating a live puppy would have to surface just to cut her 8 point lead in Pennsylvania *in half*.']]

classify and reply

['>>{mafco} : Hey, Mark Zuckerberg, Trump’s Rise Is Partly On You', ">>{RabidTurtl} : Trump to make 'closing argument,' lay out plan for first 100 days", '>>{MegaSansIX} : I like how the media is "rigged" against Trump yet fake news stories were rampant on the internet. I mean there are stories claiming Clinton worships Moloch and has connections to aliens', '>>{RabidTurtl} : > Trump is set to offer up the key principles and policies driving his presidential campaign in a speech Saturday morning in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Funny, his first policy speech may end up being the last one.', '>>{E-rockComment} : Blame everyone except Hillary R. Clinton for losing.', ">>{whitemest} : Shouldn't trump have done this 3 debates worth, *and* during the primaries?", '>>{FoxMcWeezer} : Too thick. Makes gripping your phone even more difficult if you have a plus. Funny thing is they try to convince you this bad design is a plus by saying "The thicker it is, the more protection it gives". Well yeah, if I wrap my phone in pillows, I never have to worry about dropping and breaking it.', ">>{dominoid73} : I'm sure it will be full of buzz words and dog whistles.", '>>{nac03017} : Why do some apps run in the background despite having background app refresh turned off?', '>>{joltto} : That nobody listened to or gave a shit about.', ">>{sfitz0076} : Or the DNC or registered Democrats who didn't show up to vote for her.", ">>{MarionCast} : I was wondering about this as well. They even run in the background when under low power mode, which supposedly stops any background activity from running right? Except music I guess (I'm able to use spotify in low power mode for instance).", ">>{PANSIES_FOR_ALL} : > You have no idea what you're talking about. Thank God you're here to enlighten us all.", ">>{flimsyfresh} : Yeah, this guy thinks he's the be-all end-all for phone cases.", '>>{nac03017} : I see a lot under my stats: snapchat, instagram, messages, App Store, GroupMe, and iTranslate', '>>{mysticportal} : You should definitely try the Supcase Unicorn Beetle. Bumper style with clear back.', '>>{McInnis7} : I see this same behavior. Background refresh off too.', '>>{miashaee} : Prepare for a fantasyland speech everyone, where he tries to clean up his mess of an image/campaign.', ">>{truthhurts4444} : What's the significance of the first 100 days of a presidency?", ">>{nac03017} : If I remember correctly, I read something that says there is three ways apps can run in the background without having background app refresh on: using location services, playing music, or listening for VoIP calls. But this doesn't add up, only snapchat has voip calling, so why are these other apps running?", '>>{bmalph182} : At Gettysburg. Someone should probably tell him that the Confederacy lost that battle.', '>>{abacabbx} : Some apps classify themselves as media players, which allows them to bend the rules a bit with background activity. Facebook is notorious for abusing this.', ">>{toddwalnuts} : this shit is really annoying with instagram and Snapchat, I'd love to hear an explanation", '>>{itsclobberintime} : Definitely thought this was a joke being called the "Unicorn Beetle" lol, but it looks great with some great reviews! Thanks!', ">>{cheefjustice} : **Day 1**: Watch Hillary's inauguration on TV. Tweet about her outfit. **Day 2**: Trump Organization exec team meeting with Ivanka, Junior, and the other one. Reassure Ivanka that even though I've destroyed her reputation as a smart, centered role model for millennial women, she’s still hot. **Day 3**: Revenue is collapsing at all my hotels. Why did I build them in blue states and foreign countries? Wonder if it’s possible to move all those buildings to Mississippi. **Day 4**: Trump Organization stock is tanking. Call Russian bankers (US bankers won't return my calls) to see if they can create a derivative that allows me to monetize declaring Chapter 11. **Day 5**: Oh well, at least I've got my right-wing media startup. Call Bannon. He says he’s decided to launch a company with Ailes instead of me because I’m too undisciplined and have no attention span. If only there had been some way for me to predict that he was such an untrustworthy scumbag. **Day 6**: Bathe in the blood of murdered orphans. Refreshing! **Days 7-100**: Tanning.", ">>{Uncleniles} : In the first 100 days my cabinet will set out to un-eh-quivalently prove that I never met those women, and that they were fives, tops. Didn't happen, call Hannity.", ">>{ChildishGeorginio} : I have the same issues with instagram, even with background refresh off. Whenever I'm browsing instagram and say I scroll down to the middle of the page, if I put my phone down and the screen locks, instagram will automatically refresh my page and bring me right back up to the top again. I can't for the life of me figure out how to stop this from happening.. :(", ">>{MarionCast} : I still get background usage with the FB app but it's minimal. It's notoriously bad for Messenger though. https://imgur.com/a/TWRDa", ">>{dezdicardo} : that's when they have the best chance of getting something done. after that, it's time to focus on the midterms, and after the midterms it's time to focus on winning the white house. 100 days in 4 years, kinda ridiculous.", '>>{mikelieman} : **Day 2** Melina files for divorce, Children hold meeting, and inform me that they\'re changing their name to one that with better brand recognition, "Hitler".', ">>{Cedric182} : Idk if playing music while the phone is locked is considered background for Spotify. But I'm sure facebook and messenger probably still find ways on how to stay on... idk if they fixed it.", ">>{stonebone4} : My first 100 days will be the best 100 days in the history. Believe me. Its going to be tremendous. Just tremendous. Hillary's first 100 days, a disaster. Total disaster. Believe me folks.", ">>{MarionCast} : I have no problems with Spotify i think thats to be expected anyway. I do worry about the unusually high background usage for Messenger in particular though. Facebook doesn't seem to be a huge offender now.", '>>{SoloDoloed} : I use the Pitaka Aramid Fiber case. Very thin and sleek.', ">>{barbe_du_cou} : She was yesterday's target. The left will continue to innovate in lashing out against the world for not behaving as demanded.", '>>{agarayze} : Not a brand name case but I found this aluminum bumper to be slim and nice to hold, nice build quality too. https://www.amazon.com/RANVOO-ARMOR-iPhone-Aluminum-Bumper/dp/B01M61VCIQ/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&qid=1491972027&sr=8-7&keywords=iphone+7+aluminum+bumper', '>>{kool-keith} : the left is looking for scapegoats i wonder if the huffpo has the self awareness to understand their own role in trumps rise? lol, who am i kidding', '>>{MegaSansIX} : what about the witchcraft/vampire one? The Marina Abramovic story got way too much coverage', '>>{Catzendo} : I wish he\'d just answer the question "Describe the Great America he wants to get back to" or "How will you unite the divided America you\'ve created"', ">>{OMGSPACERUSSIA} : Or maybe this was Hillary and the DNC's fault. Maybe we should stop apportioning blame and focus on the problem here...the fact that the DNC brought a mule to a formula 1 race. It doesn't matter that the Republicans wound up fielding a cheap Hyundai with a tacky spoiler glued on and a badly done under-lighting scheme. The mule still fucking lost.", ">>{RandyG93} : Crash guard or the rhinoshield play proof. That's my case of choice. Only slightly bigger then the apple silicone case but has 11ft drop protection. Best of both worlds for me.", ">>{chamotruche} : It certainly played a part. I know a lot of people who on Facebook were convinced Clinton would start World War 3. Anti-intellectualism certainly won this time. We now live in a post-fact era, and it's honestly terrifying.", ">>{omeow} : *day1* - finish what losers like Obama couldn't do in four years. *Day -2* tweet about day 0 and 1. *Day-3* secretly handover all work to Mike. *Day-4* start making America great again. *Day5-99* take a break like stars need to. *Day 100* take credit for all the work in first 100 days.", ">>{RJForsc2} : Funny, I just got an iPhone 7 2 weeks ago and I just ordered a Commuter case for it off Amazon. I'm hoping it isn't TOO bulky but I want more drop protection. For a minimalist case I had the Air Prism by Ringke for a week now and it is a clear rubber (but not too grippy) with a 3D prism design on the back. Very trim and thin.", '>>{DeepThought007} : That isnt the media though, thats just bullshit internet sites.', ">>{itsclobberintime} : It's not super bulky, and definitely protective. I have a popsocket on it as well, just like something thin for summer", ">>{MyifanW} : Plenty are blaming Hillary. There's plenty of blame to go around, when the margins were so razor thin. Anything that could have shifted 2% in Florida is blamable. For example, Fuck Comey.", ">>{MyifanW} : While Clinton was a flawed candidate, the people who stayed home are more to blame. But hey, there's plenty of blame to go around.", ">>{E-rockComment} : Good point Comey really tipped the balance. I don't know how Trump would've won Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania without him.", '>>{Scrubbing_Bubbles_} : I wonder what day he will chose to round up all the journalists?', ">>{team_satan} : It's just a nice number. Bigly impressive. Makes you sound like you're planning ahead but like it's a proper plan, not some random number from nowhere.", ">>{therealhood} : Ivanka, Junior. ...and the other one...... that's hilarious.... if I wasn't such a cheapskate i would give you gold", '>>{barbe_du_cou} : Or that Clinton had a 99% chance of winning.', '>>{rk119} : Yup, fuck comey. Exit polls showed **14% decided their votes within the final week**, and most of those people went to Trump. http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls/national/president All those states with thin Trump wins, Comey did that. FL, WI, MI, PA. There are many other factors, but she did win the popular vote so didn\'t actually fail in the "we need to tear apart the DNC because she could never have won" level. She lost this critical states because Trump was in 3 of them telling people she\'s a criminal while she was dealing with comey\'s first letter. That\'s when 14% of them decided.', ">>{RabidTurtl} : Honeymoon period. After an election, it is considered the best time to push through your agenda, as you (supposedly) have the least resistance. Mostly due to the idea that you have the will of the people behind you. That and Trump probably doesn't have the focus to think beyond 100 days. Even then, 100 days seems pretty impressive for him. I bet Kellyanne had to dangle some keys in front of him just to get him to sit at the meeting for this speech.", '>>{OMGSPACERUSSIA} : And Clinton is to blame for them staying at home.', ">>{OrigamiSloth} : Maybe don't enter the race if you have two ongoing FBI investigations.", ">>{rk119} : Trump *was* smart to see the opportunity in MI. He was lucky that Comey's letter was timed around the time he went to MI so it drove his point home. He won all three of those states by a *combined lead of only ~100K people*, but that razor thin combination lost her 46 electoral votes.", ">>{Goddamn_Batman} : Here's the real plan if anyone's interested, since CNN won't actually report news- http://vesselnews.io/gettysburg-address-first-100-days-trump-administration/", ">>{rk119} : How's Manafort these days? So I heard it's been confirmed that the Trump campaign was, in fact, in regular touch with Kremlin. Isn't that the opposite of what Trump and Putin were saying?", ">>{Tony_Killfigure} : For a second I was worried that liberals would learn something from their defeat. Doesn't look like there's any real cause for concern though.", '>>{ProbablyRickSantorum} : You say this as if baby boomers know the difference.', '>>{Jabacasm} : Fuck, no it\'s not. Guys, the blame game gets us nothing. What, with Zuckerberg apologize and hit the "off" button on Facebook? Trump supporters often don\'t trust the media, go ahead and push Facebook to only prioritize "fact checked" media. That would be lunacy, politically. We need to stop pointing fingers, buck up and get to work.', '>>{Cucksimus_Maximus} : The Huffington Post needs to shut down. Absolute shit-tier "journalism"']

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{nac03017} : Why do some apps run in the background despite having background app refresh turned off?', ">>{MarionCast} : I was wondering about this as well. They even run in the background when under low power mode, which supposedly stops any background activity from running right? Except music I guess (I'm able to use spotify in low power mode for instance).", '>>{nac03017} : I see a lot under my stats: snapchat, instagram, messages, App Store, GroupMe, and iTranslate', '>>{McInnis7} : I see this same behavior. Background refresh off too.', ">>{nac03017} : If I remember correctly, I read something that says there is three ways apps can run in the background without having background app refresh on: using location services, playing music, or listening for VoIP calls. But this doesn't add up, only snapchat has voip calling, so why are these other apps running?", '>>{abacabbx} : Some apps classify themselves as media players, which allows them to bend the rules a bit with background activity. Facebook is notorious for abusing this.', ">>{toddwalnuts} : this shit is really annoying with instagram and Snapchat, I'd love to hear an explanation", ">>{ChildishGeorginio} : I have the same issues with instagram, even with background refresh off. Whenever I'm browsing instagram and say I scroll down to the middle of the page, if I put my phone down and the screen locks, instagram will automatically refresh my page and bring me right back up to the top again. I can't for the life of me figure out how to stop this from happening.. :(", ">>{MarionCast} : I still get background usage with the FB app but it's minimal. It's notoriously bad for Messenger though. https://imgur.com/a/TWRDa", ">>{Cedric182} : Idk if playing music while the phone is locked is considered background for Spotify. But I'm sure facebook and messenger probably still find ways on how to stay on... idk if they fixed it.", ">>{MarionCast} : I have no problems with Spotify i think thats to be expected anyway. I do worry about the unusually high background usage for Messenger in particular though. Facebook doesn't seem to be a huge offender now."], [">>{RabidTurtl} : Trump to make 'closing argument,' lay out plan for first 100 days", '>>{RabidTurtl} : > Trump is set to offer up the key principles and policies driving his presidential campaign in a speech Saturday morning in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Funny, his first policy speech may end up being the last one.', ">>{whitemest} : Shouldn't trump have done this 3 debates worth, *and* during the primaries?", ">>{dominoid73} : I'm sure it will be full of buzz words and dog whistles.", '>>{miashaee} : Prepare for a fantasyland speech everyone, where he tries to clean up his mess of an image/campaign.', ">>{truthhurts4444} : What's the significance of the first 100 days of a presidency?", '>>{bmalph182} : At Gettysburg. Someone should probably tell him that the Confederacy lost that battle.', ">>{cheefjustice} : **Day 1**: Watch Hillary's inauguration on TV. Tweet about her outfit. **Day 2**: Trump Organization exec team meeting with Ivanka, Junior, and the other one. Reassure Ivanka that even though I've destroyed her reputation as a smart, centered role model for millennial women, she’s still hot. **Day 3**: Revenue is collapsing at all my hotels. Why did I build them in blue states and foreign countries? Wonder if it’s possible to move all those buildings to Mississippi. **Day 4**: Trump Organization stock is tanking. Call Russian bankers (US bankers won't return my calls) to see if they can create a derivative that allows me to monetize declaring Chapter 11. **Day 5**: Oh well, at least I've got my right-wing media startup. Call Bannon. He says he’s decided to launch a company with Ailes instead of me because I’m too undisciplined and have no attention span. If only there had been some way for me to predict that he was such an untrustworthy scumbag. **Day 6**: Bathe in the blood of murdered orphans. Refreshing! **Days 7-100**: Tanning.", ">>{Uncleniles} : In the first 100 days my cabinet will set out to un-eh-quivalently prove that I never met those women, and that they were fives, tops. Didn't happen, call Hannity.", ">>{dezdicardo} : that's when they have the best chance of getting something done. after that, it's time to focus on the midterms, and after the midterms it's time to focus on winning the white house. 100 days in 4 years, kinda ridiculous.", '>>{mikelieman} : **Day 2** Melina files for divorce, Children hold meeting, and inform me that they\'re changing their name to one that with better brand recognition, "Hitler".', ">>{stonebone4} : My first 100 days will be the best 100 days in the history. Believe me. Its going to be tremendous. Just tremendous. Hillary's first 100 days, a disaster. Total disaster. Believe me folks.", '>>{Catzendo} : I wish he\'d just answer the question "Describe the Great America he wants to get back to" or "How will you unite the divided America you\'ve created"', ">>{omeow} : *day1* - finish what losers like Obama couldn't do in four years. *Day -2* tweet about day 0 and 1. *Day-3* secretly handover all work to Mike. *Day-4* start making America great again. *Day5-99* take a break like stars need to. *Day 100* take credit for all the work in first 100 days.", '>>{Scrubbing_Bubbles_} : I wonder what day he will chose to round up all the journalists?', ">>{team_satan} : It's just a nice number. Bigly impressive. Makes you sound like you're planning ahead but like it's a proper plan, not some random number from nowhere.", ">>{therealhood} : Ivanka, Junior. ...and the other one...... that's hilarious.... if I wasn't such a cheapskate i would give you gold", ">>{RabidTurtl} : Honeymoon period. After an election, it is considered the best time to push through your agenda, as you (supposedly) have the least resistance. Mostly due to the idea that you have the will of the people behind you. That and Trump probably doesn't have the focus to think beyond 100 days. Even then, 100 days seems pretty impressive for him. I bet Kellyanne had to dangle some keys in front of him just to get him to sit at the meeting for this speech.", ">>{Goddamn_Batman} : Here's the real plan if anyone's interested, since CNN won't actually report news- http://vesselnews.io/gettysburg-address-first-100-days-trump-administration/"], ['>>{FoxMcWeezer} : Too thick. Makes gripping your phone even more difficult if you have a plus. Funny thing is they try to convince you this bad design is a plus by saying "The thicker it is, the more protection it gives". Well yeah, if I wrap my phone in pillows, I never have to worry about dropping and breaking it.', ">>{PANSIES_FOR_ALL} : > You have no idea what you're talking about. Thank God you're here to enlighten us all.", ">>{flimsyfresh} : Yeah, this guy thinks he's the be-all end-all for phone cases.", '>>{mysticportal} : You should definitely try the Supcase Unicorn Beetle. Bumper style with clear back.', '>>{itsclobberintime} : Definitely thought this was a joke being called the "Unicorn Beetle" lol, but it looks great with some great reviews! Thanks!', '>>{SoloDoloed} : I use the Pitaka Aramid Fiber case. Very thin and sleek.', '>>{agarayze} : Not a brand name case but I found this aluminum bumper to be slim and nice to hold, nice build quality too. https://www.amazon.com/RANVOO-ARMOR-iPhone-Aluminum-Bumper/dp/B01M61VCIQ/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&qid=1491972027&sr=8-7&keywords=iphone+7+aluminum+bumper', ">>{RandyG93} : Crash guard or the rhinoshield play proof. That's my case of choice. Only slightly bigger then the apple silicone case but has 11ft drop protection. Best of both worlds for me.", ">>{RJForsc2} : Funny, I just got an iPhone 7 2 weeks ago and I just ordered a Commuter case for it off Amazon. I'm hoping it isn't TOO bulky but I want more drop protection. For a minimalist case I had the Air Prism by Ringke for a week now and it is a clear rubber (but not too grippy) with a 3D prism design on the back. Very trim and thin.", ">>{itsclobberintime} : It's not super bulky, and definitely protective. I have a popsocket on it as well, just like something thin for summer"], ['>>{mafco} : Hey, Mark Zuckerberg, Trump’s Rise Is Partly On You', '>>{MegaSansIX} : I like how the media is "rigged" against Trump yet fake news stories were rampant on the internet. I mean there are stories claiming Clinton worships Moloch and has connections to aliens', '>>{E-rockComment} : Blame everyone except Hillary R. Clinton for losing.', '>>{joltto} : That nobody listened to or gave a shit about.', ">>{sfitz0076} : Or the DNC or registered Democrats who didn't show up to vote for her.", ">>{barbe_du_cou} : She was yesterday's target. The left will continue to innovate in lashing out against the world for not behaving as demanded.", '>>{kool-keith} : the left is looking for scapegoats i wonder if the huffpo has the self awareness to understand their own role in trumps rise? lol, who am i kidding', '>>{MegaSansIX} : what about the witchcraft/vampire one? The Marina Abramovic story got way too much coverage', ">>{OMGSPACERUSSIA} : Or maybe this was Hillary and the DNC's fault. Maybe we should stop apportioning blame and focus on the problem here...the fact that the DNC brought a mule to a formula 1 race. It doesn't matter that the Republicans wound up fielding a cheap Hyundai with a tacky spoiler glued on and a badly done under-lighting scheme. The mule still fucking lost.", ">>{chamotruche} : It certainly played a part. I know a lot of people who on Facebook were convinced Clinton would start World War 3. Anti-intellectualism certainly won this time. We now live in a post-fact era, and it's honestly terrifying.", '>>{DeepThought007} : That isnt the media though, thats just bullshit internet sites.', ">>{MyifanW} : Plenty are blaming Hillary. There's plenty of blame to go around, when the margins were so razor thin. Anything that could have shifted 2% in Florida is blamable. For example, Fuck Comey.", ">>{MyifanW} : While Clinton was a flawed candidate, the people who stayed home are more to blame. But hey, there's plenty of blame to go around.", ">>{E-rockComment} : Good point Comey really tipped the balance. I don't know how Trump would've won Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania without him.", '>>{barbe_du_cou} : Or that Clinton had a 99% chance of winning.', '>>{rk119} : Yup, fuck comey. Exit polls showed **14% decided their votes within the final week**, and most of those people went to Trump. http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls/national/president All those states with thin Trump wins, Comey did that. FL, WI, MI, PA. There are many other factors, but she did win the popular vote so didn\'t actually fail in the "we need to tear apart the DNC because she could never have won" level. She lost this critical states because Trump was in 3 of them telling people she\'s a criminal while she was dealing with comey\'s first letter. That\'s when 14% of them decided.', '>>{OMGSPACERUSSIA} : And Clinton is to blame for them staying at home.', ">>{OrigamiSloth} : Maybe don't enter the race if you have two ongoing FBI investigations.", ">>{rk119} : Trump *was* smart to see the opportunity in MI. He was lucky that Comey's letter was timed around the time he went to MI so it drove his point home. He won all three of those states by a *combined lead of only ~100K people*, but that razor thin combination lost her 46 electoral votes.", ">>{rk119} : How's Manafort these days? So I heard it's been confirmed that the Trump campaign was, in fact, in regular touch with Kremlin. Isn't that the opposite of what Trump and Putin were saying?", ">>{Tony_Killfigure} : For a second I was worried that liberals would learn something from their defeat. Doesn't look like there's any real cause for concern though.", '>>{ProbablyRickSantorum} : You say this as if baby boomers know the difference.', '>>{Jabacasm} : Fuck, no it\'s not. Guys, the blame game gets us nothing. What, with Zuckerberg apologize and hit the "off" button on Facebook? Trump supporters often don\'t trust the media, go ahead and push Facebook to only prioritize "fact checked" media. That would be lunacy, politically. We need to stop pointing fingers, buck up and get to work.', '>>{Cucksimus_Maximus} : The Huffington Post needs to shut down. Absolute shit-tier "journalism"']]

classify and reply

['>>{DrJarns} : Rural Democrats: Party Ignored Us, Suffered The Consequences', '>>{BillTowne} : The Conscience of the Contrarian Voter. "In a normal year, an independent or a Democrat could vote for Gary Johnson and feel O.K. about it. But not this year."', '>>{BillTowne} : >I’m assuming that Johnson is taking away slightly more votes from Hillary Clinton than from Trump. But if you’re leaning toward Trump, by all means make the switch to the affable Gary Johnson.', ">>{veniceinperil} : If you work in little towns anywhere in the U.S. and you've bled for these folks as an attorney, a judge, or a social worker, this is just not true. We're not ignoring you, and we never have.", '>>{toekknow} : > The empire strikes back? Steve Bannon (“Counsel to the President”) off NSC Principal’s Committee and CIA Director on ... > — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) April 5, 2017 plus > Fact 1: Flynn/Bannon most loyal to DJT (both out at NSC) > Fact 2: McMaster wont say “Radical Islam” > Is WH serious abt defeating our enemy? ... > — Michael Flynn Jr (@mflynnJR) April 5, 2017 The fact that WikiLeaks and Flynn Jr are pissed about this gives me great pleasure.', '>>{AncillaryIssues} : Rural Democrats are in for a wake-up call when the Republicans they\'ve installed take away their Social Security, Medicare, and maybe even their "Big Gub\'mint" farm subsidies. Rural Democrats: you looked much better when you still had noses.', ">>{_BernardMarx_} : This patronizing nonsense about the imperative to vote for lesser evil is asinine. You have to vote for candidates you support for a representative democracy to work. If you're willing to vote for a candidate that is marginally better than one you despise you will be taken for granted and marginally better is all you'll get. This lesser evil tactic is why we're faced with the absurd choice of the Hillary or the Donald. This lesser evil tactic is why our politicians can line their pockets and pander to wealthy benefactors over the interests of the people they're elected to represent. Enough is enough.", '>>{tnickels} : But the Democratic Party *didn\'t* ignore them; Clinton told them the harsh reality that manufacturing and coal jobs weren\'t coming back, and Clinton offered a WPA-like jobs program as well as training for green and solar energy jobs (which were meant as an alternative to the obsolete manufacturing and coal jobs). Clinton also offered expanded social security, overtime pay, increasing the minimum wage to $12/hour (instead of remaining at a paltry $7.25/hour), more secure health insurance, and a middle-class tax cut. **All of those policies would\'ve greatly helped those rural Democrats, and she stated all of those issues repeatedly in her speeches AND on her website**. But the rural Democrats either ignored those policies, or the media failed to sufficiently address those policies (mainly because they cared more about whatever crazy shit Trump said on a daily basis). Clinton and the Democratic Party didn\'t dismiss (or forget about) its rural faction; the rural faction just preferred listening to comfortable bullshit from Trump (i.e. "We\'re going to somehow get your manufacturing jobs back!") rather than accepting the unpleasant truth. And now those Rural Democrats will pay the price for voting against their best interests and instead making an emotional vote rather than a rational vote.', '>>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : Independents favor Trump: "independents give Trump an edge, 49% say they\'d vote for him while just 29% of independent voters back Clinton." http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/06/_politics-zone-injection/trump-vs-clinton-presidential-polls-election-2016/', '>>{Breesusmvp} : Damn, TIL Clinton didnt even appeal to people in her own party.... those damned rural people... always getting in the way of city folk agendas.', ">>{stillnotking} : I swore a blood oath in '03 that I'd never vote for any politician who voted for AUMF. It would take a lot worse than Trump to make me break it. Johnson it is.", '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : The policy proposals the dems have would be great for rural America too.', ">>{WarPhalange} : Yeah, you're a fucking liar. http://www.rockinst.org/observations/wardr/2011-12-giving_getting.aspx NYC is the one supporting all of the upstate fucks.", ">>{veniceinperil} : Please tell me that's not sarcasm. We try. You wouldn't believe how hard some Americans work for the poor. The rhetoric about the last election is really insulting.", '>>{Risk_Neutral} : This is a single cherry picked poll. Independents always favor Republicans, but you need to show an aggregate.', ">>{screenwriterjohn} : Solar energy is crap. Humans get energy by burning things. Hillary did not say she would enforce the law and deport illegal immigrants. Hillary was partying with Katy Perry while Trump was talking to Americans. Also Hillary supported the Iraq war, which led to ISL. That's bad. It's a lot of things. I can't think of a damn thing Hillary supported. Trump promised to throw the Mexicans out and bring back American jobs. That's the difference.", ">>{SchlangeHatRecht} : Everyone who feels Clinton's management of confidential information was suspect should look at alternatives for their vote.", '>>{Karen_DiMarco} : I heard the Deep State is like the old *"Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!"* sketch from Monty Python . . .', ">>{annoyingstranger} : You're telling people to ignore strategic voting because it makes you feel more principled. That's how we end up with shit candidates in the first place.", ">>{dolphins3} : Well said. As trendy as it is to pretend Clinton ignored rural America, she didn't, which would be evident to anyone who listened to her talk in speeches, rallies, debates, or bothered reading her policy proposals. It's just that the media preferred to scream nonstop about emails and many Americans were too fucking lazy look beyond that.", ">>{fartwiffle} : In my opinion, Gary Johnson isn't taking votes away from any candidate. He's earning them from people that are sick of endless wars, the war on drugs, high taxes, ridiculous GOP social conservatism, DNC corruption, cronyism, corporate welfare, spying on US citizens, and the the fact that the US leads the world in incarceration rate. But that's just me, someone who is sick of the 2 major parties pulling the same bullshit year after year. However, in Minnesota people might not even be able to vote for Trump if the [DFL gets their way](http://www.startribune.com/minnesota-dfl-asks-state-supreme-court-to-order-trump-pence-removed-from-ballot/392834361/).", '>>{Karen_DiMarco} : I heard the "Deep State" then cranked the White House and had twenty of those pizzas delivered to the executive residence c.o.d. . . .', '>>{TinyBaron} : [Netanyahu 2, Putin 1](http://mondoweiss.net/2017/04/israelis-applauding-realists/)', '>>{daryltry} : does it include the money that is sent to Albany from the casinos? Specifically Seneca Niagara / Alleghany? And the difference is 5% if I read it correctly, 45% to receiving 40%. And how about the power generated by Niagara Falls...I heard Albany has their grimy hands all over that.', ">>{WatchingDonFail} : > Everyone who feels Clinton's management of confidential information was suspect should look at alternatives for their vote. That's your opinion", ">>{pizzashill} : Yeah, Wikileaks without a doubt has proven what they are at this point. The shit they're tweeting and the fact they're so desperate to prop up the alt-right is very telling.", '>>{NemWan} : >There is no deep state but if Trump supporters think it is hampering their president, I\'m for it. Go "Deep State!" [— John Dean, Nixon White House counsel](https://twitter.com/JohnWDean/status/839603256032538624)', ">>{Risk_Neutral} : You're not even countering my argument. I said republicans consistently do better with independents but that the CNN poll itself showing +20 is cherry picked.", ">>{52-6F-62} : ...One of the reasons America was ever great in the first place. If they really wanted to make America great again they should have award winning deep dish pizza in every city, not just Chicago! I love Canada, but we don't have deep dish like Chicago.", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Daily caller? Still doesn't prove anything. I know reading is hard for you.", ">>{turtledan87} : > Clinton and the Democratic Party didn't dismiss (or forget about) its rural faction Is that why she didn't even do one stop in wisconsin?", ">>{MartianMidnight} : Assange has always been an opportunist and a media whore. He will tweet anything that gets donations, and the alt-right are a bunch of suckers. I don't think the conspiracy goes deeper than that. I just think Assange is that craven of an individual.", '>>{pizzashill} : Wikileaks has done nothing but spam cringe-worthy conspiracies for the entire election cycle. The "empire strikes back" is them pushing the deep-state horseshit. They aren\'t even pissed, they\'re just a joke.', ">>{undesirabledesires} : Yeah cause assange is totally just in it for the money and attention... what a great life he's got risking his life.", ">>{miltedmalkball} : > Assange has always been an opportunist and a media whore. And now he's a Russian puppet on top of it.", ">>{Aelinsaar} : Or... you know... he's hiding out to avoid rape charges and he's basically the ultimate shut-in troll.", ">>{MartianMidnight} : Before the rape charges he was living the high life. He didn't even have a permanent address. He spent 1000's a day on air travel and hotel rooms.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : Where, exactly, do you think Red State farm subsidies come from? Oh, that\'s right. It\'s those mean, awful Blue State "city folk and their agendas" paying for Red State welfare ranchers to stay alive, because they simply can\'t survive if left to their own means. Big Blue California ALONE provides ***70%*** of the nation\'s agricultural output. I\'d suggest a little more humility when considering who pays the bills in this nation. Enjoying your computer? Your Internet? Your Wi-Fi? Your cell phone? But hey, thanks for the corn syrup.', '>>{elgul} : Just say, \'Vote for Clinton. Just vote for Clinton. Fuck *your* choice. The "*correct*" choice is Clinton. Go democracy!\'. It\'s a lot less weaselly than dancing about displaying faux-concern for people\'s individual choices.', '>>{letsgoantiquing} : Ugh...cannot wait until "deep state" becomes one of those laughably outdated phrases forever associated with mistakes from the past, like "freedom fries."', ">>{undesirabledesires} : The rape stuff is BS to discredit him. He'd never actually be charged for it and there's no evidence. 2 charges have already been dropped.", '>>{AgoraiosBum} : Rural Democrats: "Republicans obstructed the Democratic agenda, so even though Democrats helped get a lot of us health care, we voted for the guy that yelled at immigrants and promised to cut taxes for the rich and deregulate wall st." Also, here\'s an actual quote from the story: “They talk about the messages that worked in very urban areas, where you have a million people or more. But they don’t know how to talk about ordinary people.” As if City people aren\'t "ordinary" or real people.', ">>{52-6F-62} : To each their own. Maybe you don't know what a treasure you have in your country's fine deep dish.", '>>{GeneralTonic} : *Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.* Yeats', ">>{lebowskisfarmhand} : There it is, the hate machine is back. This is pure propaganda. Commie Bernie had no chance you are lying to yourself. Wikileaks was utter BS, nothing actually pertinent. Black people know who has been oppressing them for decades and who has worked to help them. It's a fact the Clinton's have. Wow, amazing you didn't mention all the bigotry from the Rs, or the 30 years of false accusations. But hey, you don't deal in reality, just fantasy. The loony left will get rejected until it goes away. If it keeps splitting votes, America will be a theocracy and they will move out. try reality sometime.", '>>{penguins2946} : Here\'s a crazy thought, maybe if Clinton wasn\'t a shit cadidate, she wouldn\'t lose to Trump if people who like Johnson the most voted for Johnson. That\'s what bothers me the most from Clinton bots. Your candidate is shit and your only argument for her is "we gotta stop Trump!". If she loses to Trump, it will be 100% her fault, not mine for voting for Johnson.', ">>{Finkarelli} : My apologies. I'm being entirely too harsh. As a pizza lover, I *want* to like it, and I've always gone into it with an open mind, but the half-dozen or so times I've had it, I've been disappointed.", ">>{Breesusmvp} : you can suggest all the humility you want, but with your west coast smug attitude and lack of caring about Americans over illegal immigrants, you can only expect the worst. Incidently, not that I am a farmer, because I couldnt do it... but farm subsidies are only for corporate farms. In order to receive subsidies, farms must be of a certain size, and the larger, the more proportion of the pie they receive. If you are a small family farm, you get nothing. If you are a co-op, you get the lions share. Farmers that I know hate the co-ops because of their seed prices. Those subsidies are chewed up by big agriculture, the little guys dont get much. But hey, they still vote republican! and I'll drink to anyone who votes republican!", ">>{Orange_Republic} : > Independents always favor Republicans That's because numerous independents left the Republican party thanks to Bush. They're really just Republicans in everything except name.", '>>{herbertJblunt} : This is how we end up with the 2 parties. It is not a secret. Until we can break from the 2 parties, we will always be having these exact same conversations, every 4 years.', '>>{roboboogienights} : I guess they need to replace "ignore" with "didn\'t pander hard enough."', '>>{WarPhalange} : I just showed you proof that what you are saying is wrong. Upstate sucks off the teat of NYC. That you have some better area in SC is irrelevant.', '>>{herbertJblunt} : Luckily about 62% of voter aged adults feel the same way.', '>>{annoyingstranger} : We can\'t break them until we\'ve used them to change the rules of our elections. It\'s the structure of this "one man, one vote" system of plurality rule that maintains the two-party system.', '>>{Opie67} : > Solar energy is crap. Humans get energy by burning things. "Automobiles are crap. Humans get around by riding other animals."', '>>{Orange_Republic} : W, and his magical 23% approval rating when he left office.', ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Hmm, The polls I read show her as a high probability winner of this election. So unless these 62% are voters of color having their votes suppressed, I don't know how that adds up", '>>{Silospek} : Rural America has become so whiny lately. What happened to the bootstraps thing I used to hear all the time?', '>>{AncillaryIssues} : Long story short? You need us more than we need you.', '>>{farcetragedy} : > Solar energy is crap. Humans get energy by burning things. > "The internet is crap. Humans transmit information by smoke signals."', '>>{DrJarns} : How did that work out for you on November 8th?', ">>{DickButtwoman} : This. We've always had their backs. We never stopped having their backs. And we get excoriated on the left and right for having their backs. So I'm very, very close to saying fuck it and not having their backs anymore. I'm gonna advocate over the next 4 years that we move resources away from white working class voters who claim to be dem but constantly come home to republicans. They turned their backs on us. What reason do we have to have theirs when there's 0 reciprocation, when it's just not noticed. I hope they remember what it was like before this.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : Hillary won over 2 million votes than your God-Emperor, and is closing in on 2.5 million. You can fool some of the people all of the time: Trumpertarians and Trumpublicans.', '>>{Breesusmvp} : The words rural and democrat dont mix. At least, not in the midwest (Iowa). I know a hell of a lot of farmers (Iowan), and not one of them is a democrat. Where the hell do you live?', ">>{CTR_SPECIAL_OPS} : I have plenty of arguments for Clinton, but it's not like Busters or Trumpers are going to listen to reason, so why bother.", ">>{Risk_Neutral} : You're saying independents favor Republicans because of Bush 43, and I'm saying this has been the case before Bush 43 so what you're saying doesn't really explain what I'm saying.", ">>{_BernardMarx_} : Strategy is important. I'm pointing out that the tactic of lesser evil voting enables politicians to take large segments for granted and offer positions that are only marginally better than their opponents. The tactic of voting for the marginally better candidate has negative strategic consequences. Want candidates you support? Stop voting for candidates you don't support. Simple isn't it?", ">>{DrJarns} : She won 3.5 million more votes than Trump in California alone so she didn't do so well in the rest of the country! Popular vote was never a factor in this race and Trump campaigned his ass off in the states that mattered because Crooked Hillary had a huge advantage from the start and he had to run the table which he did. But if winning the popular makes you feel better somehow just remember that Trump will still be inaugurated on January 20th!", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : How long before your God-Emperor is impeached and Pence installed?', ">>{seekingpolaris} : Lol, the people in the party aren't actually going to suffer the consequences. These rural Democrats are.", ">>{DrJarns} : >How long before your God-Emperor is impeached and Pence installed? You will have to take over congress before you ever accomplish that and I wouldn't think you would ever want that because the progressives seem to be much more terrified of Pence! I would suggest you start to focus on the midterms because you already got off to a bad start today by electing Pelosi again for your minority leader. It sounds like they will be making mistake number two in the DNC leadership in January. You can pretty much write off the middle of the country again in two years. You have to defend 33 seats in the Senate alone and it will most likely be a bloodbath. The majority of your party can't get past the election and focus on what matters. This is going to be a fun 4 years!", '>>{FitPCOS} : Missouri. :) I moved back home to a more rural area recently, post-graduate school. I love nature, love the land, being outdoors--but for the most part the people where I live suck. I hate to say it, because I grew up around here, but there is a definite difference between my former college town and the local flavor here.', '>>{herbertJblunt} : > It\'s the structure of this "one man, one vote" system of plurality rule that maintains the two-party system. Not really. Just look to the debates of the 70s, and the agreements made between the 2 parties back then that have lived on. Your Democrats and everyone else Republican\'s love the 2 party system. Anything else and they actually have to work for policy change to get and keep constituents versus using the divisive techniques that people like you swallow whole.', ">>{turtledan87} : Why? The experts don't expect it to flip even with the recount.", ">>{Sebatinsky} : One caveat: rural dems didn't vote for Trump. Rural republicans and independents did.", ">>{annoyingstranger} : You're acting like it's simple. People don't want the government to be *people*, we want it to enact and enforce a set of policies. People- voters and candidates- hold different positions on different policies.", '>>{Breesusmvp} : I am originally from Los Angeles... grew up in northridge, went to school in reseda. I moved to Iowa to bring my wife home after I retired from the military. I cant stand farmers... talk about self righteous assholes that believe they are solely responsible for feeding the planet..... man... but hey, I cant stand the people where I grew up either, so yea... I just sit in my house and rant on the internet. At least the cost of living is super low!!! I get to travel cheap!', ">>{herbertJblunt} : They are not mutually exclusive. Also, lookinsg statically, only about 20% of any given cycle's voters actually select the winning president. So, **even 62% of voter age say they do not trust her**, but only 40% of those show to the polls, and only 45% vote for her, then she will be getting votes from about **14% of voter age**.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : The Republicans in Congress may well dump Trump when they see what he\'s all about, and how it goes when they along with Trump tries to overthrow the New Deal. When you promise a bunch of angry sub-literates that the jobs Reagan/Bush and Wall Street sent away 35 years ago that "I\'m gonna bring back all your jobs!," prepare to reap the whirlwind when the mouth-breathers who fell for it figure out you were lying through your teeth and they\'ll just wind up poorer and more disappointed than ever. Of course, I\'m sure the moron class will find a way to blame everything on "the goddam lib\'ruls." The stupid is self-perpetuating, which is another reason the American Right hates education: it frankly hurts their chances of selling their trickle-down bullshit.', '>>{DrJarns} : > The Republicans in Congress may well dump Trump when they see what he\'s all about Trumps supporters took over the party across the country and the majority of the GOP members can\'t afford to have those people turn against them even if they don\'t like Trump. >When you promise a bunch of angry sub-literates that the jobs Reagan/Bush and Wall Street sent away 35 years ago that "I\'m gonna bring back all your jobs!," Your party has gotten away with that for decades! If Trump does an average job you can write those people off in 4 years and definitely in two. >Of course, I\'m sure the moron class will find a way to blame everything on "the goddam lib\'ruls I hope you are very active over the next two years because you are the reason your party can\'t get out of its own way and you lost not only the presidency but across the board in national and state offices!', '>>{Breesusmvp} : I feel like farmers have a chip on their shoulder because they cant just take a fucking vacation whenever they want to. And what really pisses me off is that they force their kids into the business. They dont give them a choice to be what they want. They even take their kids out of school for harvest! Like their fucking family business is more important than a damned education... I am not an atheist, I just dont believe in any organized religion. I dont get harassed about it, so it hasnt been a problem... yet. About the best thing I can think of in living near all these farmers, is that my brother in law always has plenty of ribeyes for the grill.... and I get them as thick as I want. I didnt hate california when I lived there, but when I moved away, I found out just how bad it is... kind of like how if you lived near a pig farm, eventually you wouldnt smell the shit, but when you move away, and then come back... your eyes (and nose) are opened. When I got into the military, thats what opened my eyes to politics.', ">>{BAHatesToFly} : How about major publications stop trying to convince people to vote differently? If you want to vote strategically (ie, for the lesser evil), great. If you want to vote for who best represents your principles, great. Just vote. Or don't, it's your option.", ">>{turtledan87} : Ok I'll set up a reminder and come back when the recount is done", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : That\'s true Another thing is that the voters are kind of "innured" to this. With really poor ethics,m and known criminality from so many of our recent candidats, from Reagann to Trump and his business crimes, these " a little smoke and no fire" issues kind of get lost in the noise You know, it\'s a kind of gratitude. Rather than saying "She\'s bad because she may have mishandled stuff occasionally" they\'re looking at this and saying, "look! Compared to Reaga\'Bush, a non scandal! We\'re going somewhere!" There is "nirvana fallacy" here. While the email handling may not be exact, and even is we\'re letting Powell and everyone else off the hook, it jst looks so small compared to Reagan/Bush real felonies If you remember', '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : Not sarcasm. I am one of those people that work hard for Americans. I feel your pain man.', '>>{herbertJblunt} : > Reagann to Trump I like how you ignored all the Democrats that have been actually convicted of crimes, but bring up 2 that are only alleged. > "She\'s bad because she may have mishandled stuff occasionally" Only the mainstream media paints it that way. What she did was incomprehensible to anyone that holds security clearance. This is something the media and their fans cannot understand. > There is "nirvana fallacy" here. While the email handling may not be exact, and even is we\'re letting Powell and everyone else off the hook, it jst looks so small compared to Reagan/Bush real felonies 2 lefts do not make a right. The fallacy is to think that anyone elses poor behavior in any way excuses her. It does not. > If you remember Obviously you did not with the unfinished statement.', ">>{gofuckurself_ctr} : So you're saying the fact that she didn't even campaign in Wisconsin doesn't matter at all?", '>>{dolphins3} : > Solar energy is crap. Humans get energy by burning things. Scientific medicine is crap. Humans recover from illness by begging imaginary beings for help.', '>>{dolphins3} : > As if City people aren\'t "ordinary" or real people. It\'s actually a fairly common form of reverse snobbery in some areas. It\'s kind of funny, honestly.', ">>{_BernardMarx_} : People want candidates they believe would represent them well in government. If such a candidate is offered there's no need for lesser evil voting. As the expression indicates, it's about voting for a candidate you don't believe would represent you well because they're marginally better than other candidates who would represent you more poorly. Embrace this tactic and politicians will take your vote for granted. Need evidence? I present the Hillary versus the Donald.", ">>{Caveat-Emperor} : In other words, Clinton didn't lie to rural voters. Il Douche did. And they picked the liar.", ">>{annoyingstranger} : OK, present Hillary versus the Donald. If 30% of the electorate truly supports Donald, and 30% truly supports Clinton, what's accomplished by giving Stein and Johnson their own 20% each? The race is still down to Clinton or Trump.", '>>{theRealRedherring} : somebody please elaborate, WTF is a rural democrat?', '>>{Zukb6} : If Dems are hoping to win back voters, giving them a lesson in how dumb they are for not voting for them and how Dem policies are secretly great for them is not going to work. This comment really is more in response to the comments in this thread and not so much the article itself.', '>>{CallsOutTheBullshit} : Classic Post Hoc. Just because Hillary Clinton herself didn\'t visit Wisconsin doesn\'t mean the Democratic party forgot about rural people. Other Clinton members and Kaine both definitely made stops there. Sure, it was a bit curious why she didn\'t go herself (I\'m guessing the big data folks in her campaign gave her bad projections), but there\'s no logical way to conclude the cause of some rural animosity was because she didn\'t visit cheese land. The Democrats wanted to help struggling, rural communities. The Democrat did not get elected. Sure, the Democrats will suffer consequences. They\'ll now have to craft campaigns based on feelings, like appealing to petulant children, because fly over America can\'t handle "real talk." Feelings over facts apparently works these days. Call it a post-truth society. But, really, the people who will suffer the most will be those who voted against their own interests by supporting Trump. Now, we\'ll have to hear sob stories of "I had no idea Trump planned to do this! I had no idea Trump would back out of his campaign promises! I had no idea Trump wanted to lower wages! I had no idea Trump wanted to cut my healthcare! I had no idea Trump wanted to shut down the only public school in my town!"', '>>{10390} : Things could be different this year. A number of Democrats became Independents after the DNC debacle.', ">>{_BernardMarx_} : Buster? What's up with that? There are plenty of arguments for the Hillary. There are plenty of arguments against the Hillary. Just because people don't share your opinion about the relative merits of those arguments doesn't mean they aren't listening and are deserving of insults. That patronizing nonsense is absurd.", '>>{Risk_Neutral} : Pretty sure a negligible amount of 20 year olds who registered as Dems for the primaries did. Not sure who else.', '>>{iHateTheStuffYouLike} : >"Denver won the superbowl!" >"Carolina had more passing and rushing yards though..." >"How many touchdowns did they score?', '>>{WatchingDonFail} : > I like how you ignored all the Democrats that have been actually convicted of crimes, but bring up 2 that are only alleged. Fair enough, although Reagan was hardly "alleged" Nor are Trump\'s', '>>{_BernardMarx_} : Sometimes a strategy has to have a longer horizon than one election. The Hillary will be our next President absent revelations about her corruption or abuse of office so severe that the Donald prevails. Regardless, the debates offer some hope of the Donald calling out her wealth built on the back of "public service" and highlighting the corruption of our politicians and their betrayal of their constituents. Voting for either of these clowns is unconscionable to me. When enough people come to this realization we can stop hoping for change and start realizing some. Voting for clowns like the Donald and the Hillary validates and sustains our corrupt system.', ">>{DrJarns} : Denver won the Superbowl, the other stats don't much matter.", '>>{FreshHotTakes} : We are out numbered out here. Big time. I moved to a fairly rural part of America and they hate democrats. And they have more people. It is an uphill battle.', ">>{veniceinperil} : Look up Bastrop, Texas. Basically, they're religious, they're Masons, and they're oddly proud of being German. My great-grandfather moved away from them to start the first white settlement in Austin, Texas in the 1830's. They're cliqueish and mean.", '>>{juanschwartz} : > voting against their best interests This is such a horse shit trope.', ">>{herbertJblunt} : They are as much alleged as Hillary's email crimes, I agree. Tons of evidence, but no conviction yet.", ">>{juanschwartz} : > voted against their interests Man you guys love to concern troll. Maybe my personal best interest isn't the best interest of the entire union?", ">>{juanschwartz} : And you can't figure out why rural America told you to fuck off. You make fun of their faith and parade an over-energetic Puerto Rican dancing up Main St wearing nothing but a cock-sock to show gay pride and diversity. Why are they so set in their ways?!!!", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : > They are as much alleged as Hillary's email crimes, I agree. Get back to me when islamic terrorsts are killing US federal employees with weaponry that HRC gave them Remember, blaming her for the (R) disaster at Benghazi doesn't count. I want something taht may be true!", '>>{10390} : I know more than a few significantly older long time Dems who left the party in CA, but have no way of knowing the totals.', '>>{Neglectful_Stranger} : Maybe the lesson is that sometimes you need to lie to hide a truth that would piss people off?', ">>{herbertJblunt} : > Get back to me when islamic terrorsts are killing US federal employees with weaponry that HRC gave them That is not the public's litmus test on whether or not Hillary mishandled her emails.", ">>{Neglectful_Stranger} : > working class voters who claim to be dem but constantly come home to republicans. ....they've been voting Dems for a long time, this is the first time they broke in significant numbers for a Republican.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : Exactly, the fact that 100 FBI agents could find no indictment is the litmus test', ">>{CallsOutTheBullshit} : I used to feel bad for them, sure. But no one can help somebody who doesn't want to be helped.", '>>{annoyingstranger} : > Voting for clowns like the Donald and the Hillary validates and sustains our corrupt system. This is exactly what I said for the entire primary season, but nobody listened.', ">>{herbertJblunt} : That was only one investigation. There are several others still. Many more litmus tests to go through, and rightfully so. The public deserves this as much as they deserve Trump's taxes. I want both since neither candidate have my favor at this time. I also want full health reports from both, 3rd party reviewed too.", '>>{Breesusmvp} : I did not read the post-election analysis. Where i went to vote, there were not many people, no lines, and nobody was talking. I think I live in a democratic enclave within the greater republican stronghold... mainly because of the strong ties my university has with the community, and the professors are extremely liberal.... not so sure about the students... we are a small campus, a private university with only 900 students, no greek life, and no real overt activism for either political ideology.', ">>{MyGamerProfile} : Oh please, half your party spends it's time sperging out, insulting people like miners, construction workers and farmers; then the other half of your party spends it's time telling us not to believe our own lying eyes and ears.", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : > Many more litmus tests to go through, and rightfully so. Not rightfully so? It's an obvious witch hunt > I also want full health reports from both, HRC released hers over a year ago. It looks like we should concentrate on Trump", '>>{_BernardMarx_} : A lot of people voted for Bernie, young people especially. Some people were listening.', ">>{Gsteel11} : Lol...well youre about to find out. I'm hunkering down and saving money. The storm is coming.", '>>{Gsteel11} : Are you saying that if she stopped in wisconsin you would have all voted for her? Come on, thats bs. Hicks got acammed by trump and didnt care. Hillary could have spent a month there and the results would have been the same.', '>>{Gsteel11} : Yup, rural. Dems and gop. Oh well, vote is done now. If they need help ask trump for it.', '>>{juanschwartz} : If only tweeting your outrage were a survival skill...', '>>{juanschwartz} : Maybe they don\'t want or need your "help".', '>>{Gsteel11} : Twitter will be the last thing anyone is worried about.', ">>{juanschwartz} : Well it's the only thing most millenials are good at. I've got my guns, food and tools. I'll be good for a long time. Hopefully I can find the acreage and home I want sooner than later.", '>>{Gsteel11} : Sad you may likely have to put those things to use. Millenials are about to get a crash course in life.', ">>{Connuance} : Clinton gave these workers the least attention compared to Bernie and Trump. Firstly, Trump says he'll bring jobs back. Bernie offered more than Hillary straight up. She seemed less interested. Secondly, these folks are not the portion of the middle class that will receive the tax cuts proposed. Most cuts go primarily to the top and then get distributed mostly to the actual middle class. These constituents were working class ( bottom of middle class) and would see close to no effective cuts. Thirdly, social security, overtime, etc. All these things are based on hours worked or just having a job. Sure it's great to draw from social security now, but wouldn't it be better to be working and paying into it for retirement? With the information they had, they voted in what they believed were their best interests. That's on more than just Clinton, but she was definitely tone deaf throughout the primaries.", '>>{Gsteel11} : Trump promised to buy them golden bootstraps! All part of his "emperor\'s new clothes" fashion line, ivanka is designing it!', '>>{Gsteel11} : This is a common kind of line for trump, those are "elitists" in the city, all rich and snobby!', ">>{annoyingstranger} : And yet, Trump. The majority of Republican primary voters voted *against* him, and if they had a strategy they would've beaten him, too.", '>>{Gsteel11} : I used to live in SC. Please stop lying, its a craphole. Wait, are you talking about chaleston or Hilton head? Maybe there its ok, rest of the state is craptown. Amazing how you cheer actual total disasters, I have to assume you never leave your gated community while in SC.', ">>{hardliney} : I emailed Mr. Egan about this article. Basically I've borrowed an idea from Balanced Revolution. Find a friend who also likes Johnson but whose second preference is opposite yours: So my preference is Johnson>Trump>Clinton and my friend's preference is Johnson>Clinton>Trump. Since your 2nd preference would cancel out in the general election, you can agree to both vote for Johnson with a clear conscience.", '>>{The_Denver_D} : Denver won the Superbowl Your God Damn right we did!', '>>{_BernardMarx_} : Would that have been better? Bush? Rubio? Cruz? Pretty bleak pickings.', ">>{nfirm} : > what's accomplished by giving Stein and Johnson their own 20% each? The race is still down to Clinton or Trump. Yes but... Based on current rules it means that Stein and Johnson would get to debate along with Clinton and Trump instead of duking it out with some guy who is only qualified on handful of state ballots and has an imaginary friend as a running mate on C-SPAN 12 or during the PBS time slot after the Bob Ross re-run hour.", '>>{gofuckurself_ctr} : Oh, so rallys mean nothing at all too. Gotcha.', '>>{annoyingstranger} : Sure, but... Trump? A majority of Republicans thought *someone* else would be better.', ">>{annoyingstranger} : Oh. I didn't realize we were talking about how voters respond to pollsters; I thought we were talking about the election.", ">>{_BernardMarx_} : It's ridiculous. Of course, this fact certainly scratched the veneer of seriousness on the Rubios, Cruzes, and Bushes of the world. Are they really that much less ridiculous?", ">>{annoyingstranger} : You're right that Gary's earning votes. That doesn't mean he's not helping Trump.", ">>{Gsteel11} : That's not quite what i said, but whatever.", ">>{CallsOutTheBullshit} : Yep, I remember the first time trying to tie my shoe or ride a bike. I didn't want help either.", '>>{BillTowne} : No. I continually make the argument that Clinton is an excellent candidate, with experience and a good track record, though I often express disappointment that she is opposing the TPP, which is a vital part of our effort to support our Asian allies in defense from Chinese efforts to dominate the area.', ">>{BillTowne} : Or you could just say, don't bother me with facts, I don;t pay them much mind. If you don't like people arguing for their side, this may not be the best site for you. Whichever candidate you favor, I am sure there is a reddit site that allows only positive statements in support of that candidate.", '>>{BillTowne} : Yes. I have made that deal with 35 different people who all think I am voting third party.', ">>{BillTowne} : Imagine, editorial/opinion pages of major publications trying to influence how people vote. I don't think that it is a matter of people arguing against 3rd party candidates asking that you vote strategically. I have heard many people who are voting for a third party say that are doing it to send a message to the Democratic party. Isn't that voting strategically? The fact is that a third party candidate is not going to win this election. Jill Stein is so low that 538 doesn't even give numbers for her. They give poll numbers for Johnson, currently 8.7%, but not for probability of winning. because they don't measure numbers that small. Instead they just put < 0.1% With odds less than one per thousand and with elections every for years, someone with those odds who ran every 4 years since the start of recorded history with the founding of the Minoan civilization 4 thousand years ago in the bronze age would still not have won. So, voting for a third party candidate has to be designed to meet some goal other than making them president, such as trying to build a party long term, or to send a message to the major parties. Anyone who votes for Johnson thinking he might win is fooling himself. Voting for any other reason is strategic voting.", '>>{BillTowne} : Most "independents" are Republicans who are too embarrassed to admit it even to themselves. So they call themselves independents but vote consistently Republican. There are some, but far fewer who do the same thing on the left. I, for example, consistently vote Democratic but do not call myself a Democrat. I call myself an anti-Republican.', '>>{nfirm} : I fell and hit my head so I\'m a little confused. Massive headache and an hour ago when I typed the above now seems like years ago. Anywho... How does inclusion in the debate not impact the election. Ask Ross Perot. Please forgive me for quoting wikipedia, but... "Just prior to the debates, Perot received 7–9% support in nationwide polls.[38] It is likely that the debates played a significant role in his ultimate receipt of 19% of the popular vote." Or if that doesn\'t count as impacting the election, how about how future elections would be impacted? Federal funding for parties exceeding the 5% threshold, the reduced ballot access hurdles some states have for parties that meet certain thresholds in the previous election, and I\'m sure there are more, but headache and things so that\'s all for now.', '>>{annoyingstranger} : Debate inclusion would absolutely affect the election, but it is not dependent on how voters vote. It depends on how voters respond to pollsters.', ">>{hardliney} : I'd only make the deal with a trusted friend."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{toekknow} : > The empire strikes back? Steve Bannon (“Counsel to the President”) off NSC Principal’s Committee and CIA Director on ... > — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) April 5, 2017 plus > Fact 1: Flynn/Bannon most loyal to DJT (both out at NSC) > Fact 2: McMaster wont say “Radical Islam” > Is WH serious abt defeating our enemy? ... > — Michael Flynn Jr (@mflynnJR) April 5, 2017 The fact that WikiLeaks and Flynn Jr are pissed about this gives me great pleasure.', '>>{Karen_DiMarco} : I heard the Deep State is like the old *"Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!"* sketch from Monty Python . . .', '>>{Karen_DiMarco} : I heard the "Deep State" then cranked the White House and had twenty of those pizzas delivered to the executive residence c.o.d. . . .', '>>{TinyBaron} : [Netanyahu 2, Putin 1](http://mondoweiss.net/2017/04/israelis-applauding-realists/)', ">>{pizzashill} : Yeah, Wikileaks without a doubt has proven what they are at this point. The shit they're tweeting and the fact they're so desperate to prop up the alt-right is very telling.", '>>{NemWan} : >There is no deep state but if Trump supporters think it is hampering their president, I\'m for it. Go "Deep State!" [— John Dean, Nixon White House counsel](https://twitter.com/JohnWDean/status/839603256032538624)', ">>{52-6F-62} : ...One of the reasons America was ever great in the first place. If they really wanted to make America great again they should have award winning deep dish pizza in every city, not just Chicago! I love Canada, but we don't have deep dish like Chicago.", ">>{MartianMidnight} : Assange has always been an opportunist and a media whore. He will tweet anything that gets donations, and the alt-right are a bunch of suckers. I don't think the conspiracy goes deeper than that. I just think Assange is that craven of an individual.", '>>{pizzashill} : Wikileaks has done nothing but spam cringe-worthy conspiracies for the entire election cycle. The "empire strikes back" is them pushing the deep-state horseshit. They aren\'t even pissed, they\'re just a joke.', ">>{undesirabledesires} : Yeah cause assange is totally just in it for the money and attention... what a great life he's got risking his life.", ">>{miltedmalkball} : > Assange has always been an opportunist and a media whore. And now he's a Russian puppet on top of it.", ">>{Aelinsaar} : Or... you know... he's hiding out to avoid rape charges and he's basically the ultimate shut-in troll.", ">>{MartianMidnight} : Before the rape charges he was living the high life. He didn't even have a permanent address. He spent 1000's a day on air travel and hotel rooms.", '>>{letsgoantiquing} : Ugh...cannot wait until "deep state" becomes one of those laughably outdated phrases forever associated with mistakes from the past, like "freedom fries."', ">>{undesirabledesires} : The rape stuff is BS to discredit him. He'd never actually be charged for it and there's no evidence. 2 charges have already been dropped.", ">>{52-6F-62} : To each their own. Maybe you don't know what a treasure you have in your country's fine deep dish.", ">>{Finkarelli} : My apologies. I'm being entirely too harsh. As a pizza lover, I *want* to like it, and I've always gone into it with an open mind, but the half-dozen or so times I've had it, I've been disappointed."], ['>>{DrJarns} : Rural Democrats: Party Ignored Us, Suffered The Consequences', ">>{veniceinperil} : If you work in little towns anywhere in the U.S. and you've bled for these folks as an attorney, a judge, or a social worker, this is just not true. We're not ignoring you, and we never have.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : Rural Democrats are in for a wake-up call when the Republicans they\'ve installed take away their Social Security, Medicare, and maybe even their "Big Gub\'mint" farm subsidies. Rural Democrats: you looked much better when you still had noses.', '>>{tnickels} : But the Democratic Party *didn\'t* ignore them; Clinton told them the harsh reality that manufacturing and coal jobs weren\'t coming back, and Clinton offered a WPA-like jobs program as well as training for green and solar energy jobs (which were meant as an alternative to the obsolete manufacturing and coal jobs). Clinton also offered expanded social security, overtime pay, increasing the minimum wage to $12/hour (instead of remaining at a paltry $7.25/hour), more secure health insurance, and a middle-class tax cut. **All of those policies would\'ve greatly helped those rural Democrats, and she stated all of those issues repeatedly in her speeches AND on her website**. But the rural Democrats either ignored those policies, or the media failed to sufficiently address those policies (mainly because they cared more about whatever crazy shit Trump said on a daily basis). Clinton and the Democratic Party didn\'t dismiss (or forget about) its rural faction; the rural faction just preferred listening to comfortable bullshit from Trump (i.e. "We\'re going to somehow get your manufacturing jobs back!") rather than accepting the unpleasant truth. And now those Rural Democrats will pay the price for voting against their best interests and instead making an emotional vote rather than a rational vote.', '>>{Breesusmvp} : Damn, TIL Clinton didnt even appeal to people in her own party.... those damned rural people... always getting in the way of city folk agendas.', '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : The policy proposals the dems have would be great for rural America too.', ">>{WarPhalange} : Yeah, you're a fucking liar. http://www.rockinst.org/observations/wardr/2011-12-giving_getting.aspx NYC is the one supporting all of the upstate fucks.", ">>{veniceinperil} : Please tell me that's not sarcasm. We try. You wouldn't believe how hard some Americans work for the poor. The rhetoric about the last election is really insulting.", ">>{screenwriterjohn} : Solar energy is crap. Humans get energy by burning things. Hillary did not say she would enforce the law and deport illegal immigrants. Hillary was partying with Katy Perry while Trump was talking to Americans. Also Hillary supported the Iraq war, which led to ISL. That's bad. It's a lot of things. I can't think of a damn thing Hillary supported. Trump promised to throw the Mexicans out and bring back American jobs. That's the difference.", ">>{dolphins3} : Well said. As trendy as it is to pretend Clinton ignored rural America, she didn't, which would be evident to anyone who listened to her talk in speeches, rallies, debates, or bothered reading her policy proposals. It's just that the media preferred to scream nonstop about emails and many Americans were too fucking lazy look beyond that.", '>>{daryltry} : does it include the money that is sent to Albany from the casinos? Specifically Seneca Niagara / Alleghany? And the difference is 5% if I read it correctly, 45% to receiving 40%. And how about the power generated by Niagara Falls...I heard Albany has their grimy hands all over that.', ">>{turtledan87} : > Clinton and the Democratic Party didn't dismiss (or forget about) its rural faction Is that why she didn't even do one stop in wisconsin?", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : Where, exactly, do you think Red State farm subsidies come from? Oh, that\'s right. It\'s those mean, awful Blue State "city folk and their agendas" paying for Red State welfare ranchers to stay alive, because they simply can\'t survive if left to their own means. Big Blue California ALONE provides ***70%*** of the nation\'s agricultural output. I\'d suggest a little more humility when considering who pays the bills in this nation. Enjoying your computer? Your Internet? Your Wi-Fi? Your cell phone? But hey, thanks for the corn syrup.', '>>{AgoraiosBum} : Rural Democrats: "Republicans obstructed the Democratic agenda, so even though Democrats helped get a lot of us health care, we voted for the guy that yelled at immigrants and promised to cut taxes for the rich and deregulate wall st." Also, here\'s an actual quote from the story: “They talk about the messages that worked in very urban areas, where you have a million people or more. But they don’t know how to talk about ordinary people.” As if City people aren\'t "ordinary" or real people.', ">>{lebowskisfarmhand} : There it is, the hate machine is back. This is pure propaganda. Commie Bernie had no chance you are lying to yourself. Wikileaks was utter BS, nothing actually pertinent. Black people know who has been oppressing them for decades and who has worked to help them. It's a fact the Clinton's have. Wow, amazing you didn't mention all the bigotry from the Rs, or the 30 years of false accusations. But hey, you don't deal in reality, just fantasy. The loony left will get rejected until it goes away. If it keeps splitting votes, America will be a theocracy and they will move out. try reality sometime.", ">>{Breesusmvp} : you can suggest all the humility you want, but with your west coast smug attitude and lack of caring about Americans over illegal immigrants, you can only expect the worst. Incidently, not that I am a farmer, because I couldnt do it... but farm subsidies are only for corporate farms. In order to receive subsidies, farms must be of a certain size, and the larger, the more proportion of the pie they receive. If you are a small family farm, you get nothing. If you are a co-op, you get the lions share. Farmers that I know hate the co-ops because of their seed prices. Those subsidies are chewed up by big agriculture, the little guys dont get much. But hey, they still vote republican! and I'll drink to anyone who votes republican!", '>>{roboboogienights} : I guess they need to replace "ignore" with "didn\'t pander hard enough."', '>>{WarPhalange} : I just showed you proof that what you are saying is wrong. Upstate sucks off the teat of NYC. That you have some better area in SC is irrelevant.', '>>{Opie67} : > Solar energy is crap. Humans get energy by burning things. "Automobiles are crap. Humans get around by riding other animals."', '>>{Silospek} : Rural America has become so whiny lately. What happened to the bootstraps thing I used to hear all the time?', '>>{AncillaryIssues} : Long story short? You need us more than we need you.', '>>{farcetragedy} : > Solar energy is crap. Humans get energy by burning things. > "The internet is crap. Humans transmit information by smoke signals."', '>>{DrJarns} : How did that work out for you on November 8th?', ">>{DickButtwoman} : This. We've always had their backs. We never stopped having their backs. And we get excoriated on the left and right for having their backs. So I'm very, very close to saying fuck it and not having their backs anymore. I'm gonna advocate over the next 4 years that we move resources away from white working class voters who claim to be dem but constantly come home to republicans. They turned their backs on us. What reason do we have to have theirs when there's 0 reciprocation, when it's just not noticed. I hope they remember what it was like before this.", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : Hillary won over 2 million votes than your God-Emperor, and is closing in on 2.5 million. You can fool some of the people all of the time: Trumpertarians and Trumpublicans.', '>>{Breesusmvp} : The words rural and democrat dont mix. At least, not in the midwest (Iowa). I know a hell of a lot of farmers (Iowan), and not one of them is a democrat. Where the hell do you live?', ">>{DrJarns} : She won 3.5 million more votes than Trump in California alone so she didn't do so well in the rest of the country! Popular vote was never a factor in this race and Trump campaigned his ass off in the states that mattered because Crooked Hillary had a huge advantage from the start and he had to run the table which he did. But if winning the popular makes you feel better somehow just remember that Trump will still be inaugurated on January 20th!", '>>{AncillaryIssues} : How long before your God-Emperor is impeached and Pence installed?', ">>{seekingpolaris} : Lol, the people in the party aren't actually going to suffer the consequences. These rural Democrats are.", ">>{DrJarns} : >How long before your God-Emperor is impeached and Pence installed? You will have to take over congress before you ever accomplish that and I wouldn't think you would ever want that because the progressives seem to be much more terrified of Pence! I would suggest you start to focus on the midterms because you already got off to a bad start today by electing Pelosi again for your minority leader. It sounds like they will be making mistake number two in the DNC leadership in January. You can pretty much write off the middle of the country again in two years. You have to defend 33 seats in the Senate alone and it will most likely be a bloodbath. The majority of your party can't get past the election and focus on what matters. This is going to be a fun 4 years!", '>>{FitPCOS} : Missouri. :) I moved back home to a more rural area recently, post-graduate school. I love nature, love the land, being outdoors--but for the most part the people where I live suck. I hate to say it, because I grew up around here, but there is a definite difference between my former college town and the local flavor here.', ">>{turtledan87} : Why? The experts don't expect it to flip even with the recount.", ">>{Sebatinsky} : One caveat: rural dems didn't vote for Trump. Rural republicans and independents did.", '>>{Breesusmvp} : I am originally from Los Angeles... grew up in northridge, went to school in reseda. I moved to Iowa to bring my wife home after I retired from the military. I cant stand farmers... talk about self righteous assholes that believe they are solely responsible for feeding the planet..... man... but hey, I cant stand the people where I grew up either, so yea... I just sit in my house and rant on the internet. At least the cost of living is super low!!! I get to travel cheap!', '>>{AncillaryIssues} : The Republicans in Congress may well dump Trump when they see what he\'s all about, and how it goes when they along with Trump tries to overthrow the New Deal. When you promise a bunch of angry sub-literates that the jobs Reagan/Bush and Wall Street sent away 35 years ago that "I\'m gonna bring back all your jobs!," prepare to reap the whirlwind when the mouth-breathers who fell for it figure out you were lying through your teeth and they\'ll just wind up poorer and more disappointed than ever. Of course, I\'m sure the moron class will find a way to blame everything on "the goddam lib\'ruls." The stupid is self-perpetuating, which is another reason the American Right hates education: it frankly hurts their chances of selling their trickle-down bullshit.', '>>{DrJarns} : > The Republicans in Congress may well dump Trump when they see what he\'s all about Trumps supporters took over the party across the country and the majority of the GOP members can\'t afford to have those people turn against them even if they don\'t like Trump. >When you promise a bunch of angry sub-literates that the jobs Reagan/Bush and Wall Street sent away 35 years ago that "I\'m gonna bring back all your jobs!," Your party has gotten away with that for decades! If Trump does an average job you can write those people off in 4 years and definitely in two. >Of course, I\'m sure the moron class will find a way to blame everything on "the goddam lib\'ruls I hope you are very active over the next two years because you are the reason your party can\'t get out of its own way and you lost not only the presidency but across the board in national and state offices!', '>>{Breesusmvp} : I feel like farmers have a chip on their shoulder because they cant just take a fucking vacation whenever they want to. And what really pisses me off is that they force their kids into the business. They dont give them a choice to be what they want. They even take their kids out of school for harvest! Like their fucking family business is more important than a damned education... I am not an atheist, I just dont believe in any organized religion. I dont get harassed about it, so it hasnt been a problem... yet. About the best thing I can think of in living near all these farmers, is that my brother in law always has plenty of ribeyes for the grill.... and I get them as thick as I want. I didnt hate california when I lived there, but when I moved away, I found out just how bad it is... kind of like how if you lived near a pig farm, eventually you wouldnt smell the shit, but when you move away, and then come back... your eyes (and nose) are opened. When I got into the military, thats what opened my eyes to politics.', ">>{turtledan87} : Ok I'll set up a reminder and come back when the recount is done", '>>{ImSuperHighRightNow} : Not sarcasm. I am one of those people that work hard for Americans. I feel your pain man.', ">>{gofuckurself_ctr} : So you're saying the fact that she didn't even campaign in Wisconsin doesn't matter at all?", '>>{dolphins3} : > Solar energy is crap. Humans get energy by burning things. Scientific medicine is crap. Humans recover from illness by begging imaginary beings for help.', '>>{dolphins3} : > As if City people aren\'t "ordinary" or real people. It\'s actually a fairly common form of reverse snobbery in some areas. It\'s kind of funny, honestly.', ">>{Caveat-Emperor} : In other words, Clinton didn't lie to rural voters. Il Douche did. And they picked the liar.", '>>{theRealRedherring} : somebody please elaborate, WTF is a rural democrat?', '>>{Zukb6} : If Dems are hoping to win back voters, giving them a lesson in how dumb they are for not voting for them and how Dem policies are secretly great for them is not going to work. This comment really is more in response to the comments in this thread and not so much the article itself.', '>>{CallsOutTheBullshit} : Classic Post Hoc. Just because Hillary Clinton herself didn\'t visit Wisconsin doesn\'t mean the Democratic party forgot about rural people. Other Clinton members and Kaine both definitely made stops there. Sure, it was a bit curious why she didn\'t go herself (I\'m guessing the big data folks in her campaign gave her bad projections), but there\'s no logical way to conclude the cause of some rural animosity was because she didn\'t visit cheese land. The Democrats wanted to help struggling, rural communities. The Democrat did not get elected. Sure, the Democrats will suffer consequences. They\'ll now have to craft campaigns based on feelings, like appealing to petulant children, because fly over America can\'t handle "real talk." Feelings over facts apparently works these days. Call it a post-truth society. But, really, the people who will suffer the most will be those who voted against their own interests by supporting Trump. Now, we\'ll have to hear sob stories of "I had no idea Trump planned to do this! I had no idea Trump would back out of his campaign promises! I had no idea Trump wanted to lower wages! I had no idea Trump wanted to cut my healthcare! I had no idea Trump wanted to shut down the only public school in my town!"', '>>{iHateTheStuffYouLike} : >"Denver won the superbowl!" >"Carolina had more passing and rushing yards though..." >"How many touchdowns did they score?', ">>{DrJarns} : Denver won the Superbowl, the other stats don't much matter.", '>>{FreshHotTakes} : We are out numbered out here. Big time. I moved to a fairly rural part of America and they hate democrats. And they have more people. It is an uphill battle.', ">>{veniceinperil} : Look up Bastrop, Texas. Basically, they're religious, they're Masons, and they're oddly proud of being German. My great-grandfather moved away from them to start the first white settlement in Austin, Texas in the 1830's. They're cliqueish and mean.", '>>{juanschwartz} : > voting against their best interests This is such a horse shit trope.', ">>{juanschwartz} : > voted against their interests Man you guys love to concern troll. Maybe my personal best interest isn't the best interest of the entire union?", ">>{juanschwartz} : And you can't figure out why rural America told you to fuck off. You make fun of their faith and parade an over-energetic Puerto Rican dancing up Main St wearing nothing but a cock-sock to show gay pride and diversity. Why are they so set in their ways?!!!", '>>{Neglectful_Stranger} : Maybe the lesson is that sometimes you need to lie to hide a truth that would piss people off?', ">>{Neglectful_Stranger} : > working class voters who claim to be dem but constantly come home to republicans. ....they've been voting Dems for a long time, this is the first time they broke in significant numbers for a Republican.", ">>{CallsOutTheBullshit} : I used to feel bad for them, sure. But no one can help somebody who doesn't want to be helped.", '>>{Breesusmvp} : I did not read the post-election analysis. Where i went to vote, there were not many people, no lines, and nobody was talking. I think I live in a democratic enclave within the greater republican stronghold... mainly because of the strong ties my university has with the community, and the professors are extremely liberal.... not so sure about the students... we are a small campus, a private university with only 900 students, no greek life, and no real overt activism for either political ideology.', ">>{MyGamerProfile} : Oh please, half your party spends it's time sperging out, insulting people like miners, construction workers and farmers; then the other half of your party spends it's time telling us not to believe our own lying eyes and ears.", ">>{Gsteel11} : Lol...well youre about to find out. I'm hunkering down and saving money. The storm is coming.", '>>{Gsteel11} : Are you saying that if she stopped in wisconsin you would have all voted for her? Come on, thats bs. Hicks got acammed by trump and didnt care. Hillary could have spent a month there and the results would have been the same.', '>>{Gsteel11} : Yup, rural. Dems and gop. Oh well, vote is done now. If they need help ask trump for it.', '>>{juanschwartz} : If only tweeting your outrage were a survival skill...', '>>{juanschwartz} : Maybe they don\'t want or need your "help".', '>>{Gsteel11} : Twitter will be the last thing anyone is worried about.', ">>{juanschwartz} : Well it's the only thing most millenials are good at. I've got my guns, food and tools. I'll be good for a long time. Hopefully I can find the acreage and home I want sooner than later.", '>>{Gsteel11} : Sad you may likely have to put those things to use. Millenials are about to get a crash course in life.', ">>{Connuance} : Clinton gave these workers the least attention compared to Bernie and Trump. Firstly, Trump says he'll bring jobs back. Bernie offered more than Hillary straight up. She seemed less interested. Secondly, these folks are not the portion of the middle class that will receive the tax cuts proposed. Most cuts go primarily to the top and then get distributed mostly to the actual middle class. These constituents were working class ( bottom of middle class) and would see close to no effective cuts. Thirdly, social security, overtime, etc. All these things are based on hours worked or just having a job. Sure it's great to draw from social security now, but wouldn't it be better to be working and paying into it for retirement? With the information they had, they voted in what they believed were their best interests. That's on more than just Clinton, but she was definitely tone deaf throughout the primaries.", '>>{Gsteel11} : Trump promised to buy them golden bootstraps! All part of his "emperor\'s new clothes" fashion line, ivanka is designing it!', '>>{Gsteel11} : This is a common kind of line for trump, those are "elitists" in the city, all rich and snobby!', '>>{Gsteel11} : I used to live in SC. Please stop lying, its a craphole. Wait, are you talking about chaleston or Hilton head? Maybe there its ok, rest of the state is craptown. Amazing how you cheer actual total disasters, I have to assume you never leave your gated community while in SC.', '>>{The_Denver_D} : Denver won the Superbowl Your God Damn right we did!', '>>{gofuckurself_ctr} : Oh, so rallys mean nothing at all too. Gotcha.', ">>{Gsteel11} : That's not quite what i said, but whatever.", ">>{CallsOutTheBullshit} : Yep, I remember the first time trying to tie my shoe or ride a bike. I didn't want help either."], ['>>{BillTowne} : The Conscience of the Contrarian Voter. "In a normal year, an independent or a Democrat could vote for Gary Johnson and feel O.K. about it. But not this year."', '>>{BillTowne} : >I’m assuming that Johnson is taking away slightly more votes from Hillary Clinton than from Trump. But if you’re leaning toward Trump, by all means make the switch to the affable Gary Johnson.', ">>{_BernardMarx_} : This patronizing nonsense about the imperative to vote for lesser evil is asinine. You have to vote for candidates you support for a representative democracy to work. If you're willing to vote for a candidate that is marginally better than one you despise you will be taken for granted and marginally better is all you'll get. This lesser evil tactic is why we're faced with the absurd choice of the Hillary or the Donald. This lesser evil tactic is why our politicians can line their pockets and pander to wealthy benefactors over the interests of the people they're elected to represent. Enough is enough.", '>>{BravoTangoFoxObama} : Independents favor Trump: "independents give Trump an edge, 49% say they\'d vote for him while just 29% of independent voters back Clinton." http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/06/_politics-zone-injection/trump-vs-clinton-presidential-polls-election-2016/', ">>{stillnotking} : I swore a blood oath in '03 that I'd never vote for any politician who voted for AUMF. It would take a lot worse than Trump to make me break it. Johnson it is.", '>>{Risk_Neutral} : This is a single cherry picked poll. Independents always favor Republicans, but you need to show an aggregate.', ">>{SchlangeHatRecht} : Everyone who feels Clinton's management of confidential information was suspect should look at alternatives for their vote.", ">>{annoyingstranger} : You're telling people to ignore strategic voting because it makes you feel more principled. That's how we end up with shit candidates in the first place.", ">>{fartwiffle} : In my opinion, Gary Johnson isn't taking votes away from any candidate. He's earning them from people that are sick of endless wars, the war on drugs, high taxes, ridiculous GOP social conservatism, DNC corruption, cronyism, corporate welfare, spying on US citizens, and the the fact that the US leads the world in incarceration rate. But that's just me, someone who is sick of the 2 major parties pulling the same bullshit year after year. However, in Minnesota people might not even be able to vote for Trump if the [DFL gets their way](http://www.startribune.com/minnesota-dfl-asks-state-supreme-court-to-order-trump-pence-removed-from-ballot/392834361/).", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : > Everyone who feels Clinton's management of confidential information was suspect should look at alternatives for their vote. That's your opinion", ">>{Risk_Neutral} : You're not even countering my argument. I said republicans consistently do better with independents but that the CNN poll itself showing +20 is cherry picked.", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Daily caller? Still doesn't prove anything. I know reading is hard for you.", '>>{elgul} : Just say, \'Vote for Clinton. Just vote for Clinton. Fuck *your* choice. The "*correct*" choice is Clinton. Go democracy!\'. It\'s a lot less weaselly than dancing about displaying faux-concern for people\'s individual choices.', '>>{GeneralTonic} : *Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.* Yeats', '>>{penguins2946} : Here\'s a crazy thought, maybe if Clinton wasn\'t a shit cadidate, she wouldn\'t lose to Trump if people who like Johnson the most voted for Johnson. That\'s what bothers me the most from Clinton bots. Your candidate is shit and your only argument for her is "we gotta stop Trump!". If she loses to Trump, it will be 100% her fault, not mine for voting for Johnson.', ">>{Orange_Republic} : > Independents always favor Republicans That's because numerous independents left the Republican party thanks to Bush. They're really just Republicans in everything except name.", '>>{herbertJblunt} : This is how we end up with the 2 parties. It is not a secret. Until we can break from the 2 parties, we will always be having these exact same conversations, every 4 years.', '>>{herbertJblunt} : Luckily about 62% of voter aged adults feel the same way.', '>>{annoyingstranger} : We can\'t break them until we\'ve used them to change the rules of our elections. It\'s the structure of this "one man, one vote" system of plurality rule that maintains the two-party system.', '>>{Orange_Republic} : W, and his magical 23% approval rating when he left office.', ">>{WatchingDonFail} : Hmm, The polls I read show her as a high probability winner of this election. So unless these 62% are voters of color having their votes suppressed, I don't know how that adds up", ">>{CTR_SPECIAL_OPS} : I have plenty of arguments for Clinton, but it's not like Busters or Trumpers are going to listen to reason, so why bother.", ">>{Risk_Neutral} : You're saying independents favor Republicans because of Bush 43, and I'm saying this has been the case before Bush 43 so what you're saying doesn't really explain what I'm saying.", ">>{_BernardMarx_} : Strategy is important. I'm pointing out that the tactic of lesser evil voting enables politicians to take large segments for granted and offer positions that are only marginally better than their opponents. The tactic of voting for the marginally better candidate has negative strategic consequences. Want candidates you support? Stop voting for candidates you don't support. Simple isn't it?", '>>{herbertJblunt} : > It\'s the structure of this "one man, one vote" system of plurality rule that maintains the two-party system. Not really. Just look to the debates of the 70s, and the agreements made between the 2 parties back then that have lived on. Your Democrats and everyone else Republican\'s love the 2 party system. Anything else and they actually have to work for policy change to get and keep constituents versus using the divisive techniques that people like you swallow whole.', ">>{annoyingstranger} : You're acting like it's simple. People don't want the government to be *people*, we want it to enact and enforce a set of policies. People- voters and candidates- hold different positions on different policies.", ">>{herbertJblunt} : They are not mutually exclusive. Also, lookinsg statically, only about 20% of any given cycle's voters actually select the winning president. So, **even 62% of voter age say they do not trust her**, but only 40% of those show to the polls, and only 45% vote for her, then she will be getting votes from about **14% of voter age**.", ">>{BAHatesToFly} : How about major publications stop trying to convince people to vote differently? If you want to vote strategically (ie, for the lesser evil), great. If you want to vote for who best represents your principles, great. Just vote. Or don't, it's your option.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : That\'s true Another thing is that the voters are kind of "innured" to this. With really poor ethics,m and known criminality from so many of our recent candidats, from Reagann to Trump and his business crimes, these " a little smoke and no fire" issues kind of get lost in the noise You know, it\'s a kind of gratitude. Rather than saying "She\'s bad because she may have mishandled stuff occasionally" they\'re looking at this and saying, "look! Compared to Reaga\'Bush, a non scandal! We\'re going somewhere!" There is "nirvana fallacy" here. While the email handling may not be exact, and even is we\'re letting Powell and everyone else off the hook, it jst looks so small compared to Reagan/Bush real felonies If you remember', '>>{herbertJblunt} : > Reagann to Trump I like how you ignored all the Democrats that have been actually convicted of crimes, but bring up 2 that are only alleged. > "She\'s bad because she may have mishandled stuff occasionally" Only the mainstream media paints it that way. What she did was incomprehensible to anyone that holds security clearance. This is something the media and their fans cannot understand. > There is "nirvana fallacy" here. While the email handling may not be exact, and even is we\'re letting Powell and everyone else off the hook, it jst looks so small compared to Reagan/Bush real felonies 2 lefts do not make a right. The fallacy is to think that anyone elses poor behavior in any way excuses her. It does not. > If you remember Obviously you did not with the unfinished statement.', ">>{_BernardMarx_} : People want candidates they believe would represent them well in government. If such a candidate is offered there's no need for lesser evil voting. As the expression indicates, it's about voting for a candidate you don't believe would represent you well because they're marginally better than other candidates who would represent you more poorly. Embrace this tactic and politicians will take your vote for granted. Need evidence? I present the Hillary versus the Donald.", ">>{annoyingstranger} : OK, present Hillary versus the Donald. If 30% of the electorate truly supports Donald, and 30% truly supports Clinton, what's accomplished by giving Stein and Johnson their own 20% each? The race is still down to Clinton or Trump.", '>>{10390} : Things could be different this year. A number of Democrats became Independents after the DNC debacle.', ">>{_BernardMarx_} : Buster? What's up with that? There are plenty of arguments for the Hillary. There are plenty of arguments against the Hillary. Just because people don't share your opinion about the relative merits of those arguments doesn't mean they aren't listening and are deserving of insults. That patronizing nonsense is absurd.", '>>{Risk_Neutral} : Pretty sure a negligible amount of 20 year olds who registered as Dems for the primaries did. Not sure who else.', '>>{WatchingDonFail} : > I like how you ignored all the Democrats that have been actually convicted of crimes, but bring up 2 that are only alleged. Fair enough, although Reagan was hardly "alleged" Nor are Trump\'s', '>>{_BernardMarx_} : Sometimes a strategy has to have a longer horizon than one election. The Hillary will be our next President absent revelations about her corruption or abuse of office so severe that the Donald prevails. Regardless, the debates offer some hope of the Donald calling out her wealth built on the back of "public service" and highlighting the corruption of our politicians and their betrayal of their constituents. Voting for either of these clowns is unconscionable to me. When enough people come to this realization we can stop hoping for change and start realizing some. Voting for clowns like the Donald and the Hillary validates and sustains our corrupt system.', ">>{herbertJblunt} : They are as much alleged as Hillary's email crimes, I agree. Tons of evidence, but no conviction yet.", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : > They are as much alleged as Hillary's email crimes, I agree. Get back to me when islamic terrorsts are killing US federal employees with weaponry that HRC gave them Remember, blaming her for the (R) disaster at Benghazi doesn't count. I want something taht may be true!", '>>{10390} : I know more than a few significantly older long time Dems who left the party in CA, but have no way of knowing the totals.', ">>{herbertJblunt} : > Get back to me when islamic terrorsts are killing US federal employees with weaponry that HRC gave them That is not the public's litmus test on whether or not Hillary mishandled her emails.", '>>{WatchingDonFail} : Exactly, the fact that 100 FBI agents could find no indictment is the litmus test', '>>{annoyingstranger} : > Voting for clowns like the Donald and the Hillary validates and sustains our corrupt system. This is exactly what I said for the entire primary season, but nobody listened.', ">>{herbertJblunt} : That was only one investigation. There are several others still. Many more litmus tests to go through, and rightfully so. The public deserves this as much as they deserve Trump's taxes. I want both since neither candidate have my favor at this time. I also want full health reports from both, 3rd party reviewed too.", ">>{WatchingDonFail} : > Many more litmus tests to go through, and rightfully so. Not rightfully so? It's an obvious witch hunt > I also want full health reports from both, HRC released hers over a year ago. It looks like we should concentrate on Trump", '>>{_BernardMarx_} : A lot of people voted for Bernie, young people especially. Some people were listening.', ">>{annoyingstranger} : And yet, Trump. The majority of Republican primary voters voted *against* him, and if they had a strategy they would've beaten him, too.", ">>{hardliney} : I emailed Mr. Egan about this article. Basically I've borrowed an idea from Balanced Revolution. Find a friend who also likes Johnson but whose second preference is opposite yours: So my preference is Johnson>Trump>Clinton and my friend's preference is Johnson>Clinton>Trump. Since your 2nd preference would cancel out in the general election, you can agree to both vote for Johnson with a clear conscience.", '>>{_BernardMarx_} : Would that have been better? Bush? Rubio? Cruz? Pretty bleak pickings.', ">>{nfirm} : > what's accomplished by giving Stein and Johnson their own 20% each? The race is still down to Clinton or Trump. Yes but... Based on current rules it means that Stein and Johnson would get to debate along with Clinton and Trump instead of duking it out with some guy who is only qualified on handful of state ballots and has an imaginary friend as a running mate on C-SPAN 12 or during the PBS time slot after the Bob Ross re-run hour.", '>>{annoyingstranger} : Sure, but... Trump? A majority of Republicans thought *someone* else would be better.', ">>{annoyingstranger} : Oh. I didn't realize we were talking about how voters respond to pollsters; I thought we were talking about the election.", ">>{_BernardMarx_} : It's ridiculous. Of course, this fact certainly scratched the veneer of seriousness on the Rubios, Cruzes, and Bushes of the world. Are they really that much less ridiculous?", ">>{annoyingstranger} : You're right that Gary's earning votes. That doesn't mean he's not helping Trump.", '>>{BillTowne} : No. I continually make the argument that Clinton is an excellent candidate, with experience and a good track record, though I often express disappointment that she is opposing the TPP, which is a vital part of our effort to support our Asian allies in defense from Chinese efforts to dominate the area.', ">>{BillTowne} : Or you could just say, don't bother me with facts, I don;t pay them much mind. If you don't like people arguing for their side, this may not be the best site for you. Whichever candidate you favor, I am sure there is a reddit site that allows only positive statements in support of that candidate.", '>>{BillTowne} : Yes. I have made that deal with 35 different people who all think I am voting third party.', ">>{BillTowne} : Imagine, editorial/opinion pages of major publications trying to influence how people vote. I don't think that it is a matter of people arguing against 3rd party candidates asking that you vote strategically. I have heard many people who are voting for a third party say that are doing it to send a message to the Democratic party. Isn't that voting strategically? The fact is that a third party candidate is not going to win this election. Jill Stein is so low that 538 doesn't even give numbers for her. They give poll numbers for Johnson, currently 8.7%, but not for probability of winning. because they don't measure numbers that small. Instead they just put < 0.1% With odds less than one per thousand and with elections every for years, someone with those odds who ran every 4 years since the start of recorded history with the founding of the Minoan civilization 4 thousand years ago in the bronze age would still not have won. So, voting for a third party candidate has to be designed to meet some goal other than making them president, such as trying to build a party long term, or to send a message to the major parties. Anyone who votes for Johnson thinking he might win is fooling himself. Voting for any other reason is strategic voting.", '>>{BillTowne} : Most "independents" are Republicans who are too embarrassed to admit it even to themselves. So they call themselves independents but vote consistently Republican. There are some, but far fewer who do the same thing on the left. I, for example, consistently vote Democratic but do not call myself a Democrat. I call myself an anti-Republican.', '>>{nfirm} : I fell and hit my head so I\'m a little confused. Massive headache and an hour ago when I typed the above now seems like years ago. Anywho... How does inclusion in the debate not impact the election. Ask Ross Perot. Please forgive me for quoting wikipedia, but... "Just prior to the debates, Perot received 7–9% support in nationwide polls.[38] It is likely that the debates played a significant role in his ultimate receipt of 19% of the popular vote." Or if that doesn\'t count as impacting the election, how about how future elections would be impacted? Federal funding for parties exceeding the 5% threshold, the reduced ballot access hurdles some states have for parties that meet certain thresholds in the previous election, and I\'m sure there are more, but headache and things so that\'s all for now.', '>>{annoyingstranger} : Debate inclusion would absolutely affect the election, but it is not dependent on how voters vote. It depends on how voters respond to pollsters.', ">>{hardliney} : I'd only make the deal with a trusted friend."]]

classify and reply

['>>{DAREdidnotwork} : If apple switches out my 7 for being defective do I get a used phone?', ">>{portnux} : You'd probably get a refurbed iPhone of the same model, color, and specs.", '>>{alex02331} : You can ask for a new one tho. As long as you got yours new.', '>>{jvinch76} : Not true. You get a new phone. The only difference is the serial number will have a different lettering to designate it as a replacement build.', '>>{LaymanLab} : I got my phone swapped at an Apple Store and I specifically asked if the replacement phone was a refurb. They gave me some pre-memorized line about how the replacement phone isn\'t refurbished - it\'s remanufactured, with a new screen and new outer case, but the insides might have been pre-existing (I don\'t remember her exact wording). In my head, I was like "so... refurbished", but I didn\'t feel like arguing. Masters of marketing and spin :)', ">>{BrownsFanZ} : Most people aren't going to care that the inside of their phone was used before, especially if it passes Apple's standards.", '>>{Mrpornogoregrinder} : It depends on what they have in stock. It is never guaranteed a new iPhone.', '>>{nayabkl} : Not true. From a friend who is a former Genius Bar Employee, here is what he told me. All the retail iPhone have a model number starting with M. My ATT version iphone 7 model is MN9H2LL. If the phone gets defective and needs to be replaced, it will be replaced by NN9H2LL Where "N" denotes the service units unless it is within 14 days of purchase from Apple Store where they will replace it with a brand new retail model. Any iphone bought from bestbuy, verizon, att, tmo, sprint stores will be replaced with service unit no matter how many days have passed since purchase. When a new iphone is introduced and goes into production, Apple manufactures service units along with retail units because they know that certain new phones will become defective within days/weeks of being used. Apple store would usually receive batch of service units within days of a new iphone model launching so there is no way those are refurbished. So the service units can be both new or refurbished depending on time of the production/demand. As an employee looking at the white box containing the service unit they have no idea of knowing.', ">>{yungfucky} : Most likely a refurb, but Apple is one of the few companies where that's not necessarily a bad thing. Refurbs undergo way more testing than the factory devices to ensure that they actually work, everything is essentially a new part minus the motherboard, and a few other parts i can't remember, but it is essentially a new device on the surface.", '>>{portnux} : I think you get a refurb if they have the right one in stock, if not they can drop a new one on you.', ">>{middlemanmark} : You definitely don't get a new phone off the bat", ">>{LaymanLab} : I don't necessarily disagree. My commentary was more about their refusal to call a spade a spade. As long as it had a warranty and a new exterior, it was fine by me.", '>>{cocobandicoot} : Apple will never give you a "used" phone. It is always either new or "as good as new." I\'ve probably traded out a dozen products over the years with Apple, and the device I was given was always fantastic. If you want an actual used device, go through your carrier and have their insurance company send you another device. Half the time those have fake, non-Apple screens, with scratches and partially used batteries with liquid damage. Once that happens to you, you\'ll realize that Apple\'s replacements are a godsend. And don\'t bother asking the Apple employee if you\'re getting a new or "like new" device because they literally do not know. It\'s whatever is in the box that the shipping depot sends to them.', ">>{BrownsFanZ} : I agree completely about them needing to be straight up, didn't mean to sound so negative", '>>{Hollowplayer2} : They should call it service unit sounds much smoother and warmer.', '>>{TbonerT} : Refurbished would imply that they just cleaned up an existing iPhone. At least everything you touch is new with a remanufactured iPhone.', ">>{d15ko} : I'm sure people will disagree with me but I never understood why anyone expects a *new* phone. You're giving them a **used** phone. Why should they give you a brand new one in return. ( cell carries too not just apple). If your phone is brand new I.e. within it's return period sure then you get another new one. But a third of a year later I would never expect to return a used product for a brand new one.", '>>{pnoozi} : If they are in fact replacing the screen and shell, that\'s going way above and beyond "refurbished" and I don\'t have any problem with them referring to it as remanufactured.', '>>{DAREdidnotwork} : Because this phone was defective out out of the box', ">>{Sasuke082594} : How can you prove that to them? They weren't there when you opened it were you?"]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[['>>{DAREdidnotwork} : If apple switches out my 7 for being defective do I get a used phone?', ">>{portnux} : You'd probably get a refurbed iPhone of the same model, color, and specs.", '>>{alex02331} : You can ask for a new one tho. As long as you got yours new.', '>>{jvinch76} : Not true. You get a new phone. The only difference is the serial number will have a different lettering to designate it as a replacement build.', '>>{LaymanLab} : I got my phone swapped at an Apple Store and I specifically asked if the replacement phone was a refurb. They gave me some pre-memorized line about how the replacement phone isn\'t refurbished - it\'s remanufactured, with a new screen and new outer case, but the insides might have been pre-existing (I don\'t remember her exact wording). In my head, I was like "so... refurbished", but I didn\'t feel like arguing. Masters of marketing and spin :)', ">>{BrownsFanZ} : Most people aren't going to care that the inside of their phone was used before, especially if it passes Apple's standards.", '>>{Mrpornogoregrinder} : It depends on what they have in stock. It is never guaranteed a new iPhone.', '>>{nayabkl} : Not true. From a friend who is a former Genius Bar Employee, here is what he told me. All the retail iPhone have a model number starting with M. My ATT version iphone 7 model is MN9H2LL. If the phone gets defective and needs to be replaced, it will be replaced by NN9H2LL Where "N" denotes the service units unless it is within 14 days of purchase from Apple Store where they will replace it with a brand new retail model. Any iphone bought from bestbuy, verizon, att, tmo, sprint stores will be replaced with service unit no matter how many days have passed since purchase. When a new iphone is introduced and goes into production, Apple manufactures service units along with retail units because they know that certain new phones will become defective within days/weeks of being used. Apple store would usually receive batch of service units within days of a new iphone model launching so there is no way those are refurbished. So the service units can be both new or refurbished depending on time of the production/demand. As an employee looking at the white box containing the service unit they have no idea of knowing.', ">>{yungfucky} : Most likely a refurb, but Apple is one of the few companies where that's not necessarily a bad thing. Refurbs undergo way more testing than the factory devices to ensure that they actually work, everything is essentially a new part minus the motherboard, and a few other parts i can't remember, but it is essentially a new device on the surface.", '>>{portnux} : I think you get a refurb if they have the right one in stock, if not they can drop a new one on you.', ">>{middlemanmark} : You definitely don't get a new phone off the bat", ">>{LaymanLab} : I don't necessarily disagree. My commentary was more about their refusal to call a spade a spade. As long as it had a warranty and a new exterior, it was fine by me.", '>>{cocobandicoot} : Apple will never give you a "used" phone. It is always either new or "as good as new." I\'ve probably traded out a dozen products over the years with Apple, and the device I was given was always fantastic. If you want an actual used device, go through your carrier and have their insurance company send you another device. Half the time those have fake, non-Apple screens, with scratches and partially used batteries with liquid damage. Once that happens to you, you\'ll realize that Apple\'s replacements are a godsend. And don\'t bother asking the Apple employee if you\'re getting a new or "like new" device because they literally do not know. It\'s whatever is in the box that the shipping depot sends to them.', ">>{BrownsFanZ} : I agree completely about them needing to be straight up, didn't mean to sound so negative", '>>{Hollowplayer2} : They should call it service unit sounds much smoother and warmer.', '>>{TbonerT} : Refurbished would imply that they just cleaned up an existing iPhone. At least everything you touch is new with a remanufactured iPhone.', ">>{d15ko} : I'm sure people will disagree with me but I never understood why anyone expects a *new* phone. You're giving them a **used** phone. Why should they give you a brand new one in return. ( cell carries too not just apple). If your phone is brand new I.e. within it's return period sure then you get another new one. But a third of a year later I would never expect to return a used product for a brand new one.", '>>{pnoozi} : If they are in fact replacing the screen and shell, that\'s going way above and beyond "refurbished" and I don\'t have any problem with them referring to it as remanufactured.', '>>{DAREdidnotwork} : Because this phone was defective out out of the box', ">>{Sasuke082594} : How can you prove that to them? They weren't there when you opened it were you?"]]

classify and reply

[">>{BatmansParentsAreDed} : Sure, that's the official story, but Trump doesn't feel horror.", '>>{rogerpool123} : someone show the slob pictures of the kids he killed in Yemen.', '>>{olddivorcecase} : It seems that he currently feels whatever Kushner is telling him to feel. Sociopaths don\'t have emotions. Kushner is better at optics that are mainstream, Bannon is good at revving up the "alt-right". Kushner seems to be "winning" the ratings data they ALL get from Cambridge Analytica. Real people are winning the media wars, currently.', ">>{olddivorcecase} : He has no emotions. It's what he does to act normal... watch how other people react. He sees visible cues, and then guages how to react. He often gets it very wrong... hence Alex Jones, Limbaugh, etal.", ">>{ripster65} : Now, I have to tell you, it's an unbelievably complex subject. Nobody knew presidenting could be so complicated.", '>>{SantaVsDevil} : Kushner holds no sway. If he did, Trump would distance him - not bring him closer.', ">>{veridique} : But babies drowning while fleeing the terror of war in Syria didn't move him?", ">>{olddivorcecase} : Kushner is a war hawk. He approved of the Yemen raid, so he didn't react. And he's a war hawk, so he reacted to this to get Trump emotional and involved. I still have no clue who planned and masterminded the 60 missiles that completely missed their mark and did nothing but spur Assad to use chlorine gas to kill more today. Trump is def a useful idiot.", '>>{olddivorcecase} : Trump has no idea how to "be normal". His two sons are idiots, Melania wants nothing to do with him, and the Tiffany and Barron\'s mothers keep them well-distanced. The "real person" he has left in his life is Ivanka. Kushner has all the sway.', ">>{banjist} : A quick google search brought up nothing. Do you have a source for more chemical attacks in Syria today? Edit: OK so Assad didn't do more chemical attacks today. Why lie about it OP?", ">>{Chic78} : Bullshit, if he was moved those refugee kids would be on Trumps' private planes headed to Disney World. That's what I'd be fucking doing if I had the power he does. Figuratively.", ">>{olddivorcecase} : Seriously, ILY. If you or I were in power; nobody would be scrapping for change for food or safety. We'd be supporting technological advances and providing a good basic needs, technology, and arts fueled life for everyone. This is where we were headed for when I was born (JFK). The inequality war needs to be fought and won now.", '>>{IHateYouPeople616} : Wherever that war will be won, it will not be won in America; perhaps in independent states with liberal leanings.', ">>{theryanmoore} : I haven't seen this, but it wouldn't surprise me at all. He's a pretty big fan of using chlorine gas on his own citizens and has been dropping horrible barrel bombs on northern Syria constantly for years, something Trump reacted to by saying that we shouldn't touch Syria and that we shouldn't help the refugees and that we shouldn't even let Syrians into the country at all. He was actually bizarrely consistent on nonintervention in Syria until yesterday. Shit, Tillerson said we wouldn't fuck with Assad like 4 days ago. I'd like to see something on today's chlorine gas attack though, assuming it's real. Would confirm my suspicions that Assad doesn't expect anything more from Trump and will continue with business as usual. I've heard it hypothesized that he may lay low for a bit though.", ">>{banjist} : Yeah it's not like I would be surprised, but I think OP is talking out his ass on this one. That doesn't help anyone.", ">>{theryanmoore} : True that. We have to be vigilant about facts because the other side clearly doesn't give a shit. This is an infuriating time in public life, trying to communicate through the massive clouds of complete bullshit that Trump and Russia have been kicking up to obscure their true motives."]

classify the strings into threads and reply as one of them

[[">>{BatmansParentsAreDed} : Sure, that's the official story, but Trump doesn't feel horror.", '>>{rogerpool123} : someone show the slob pictures of the kids he killed in Yemen.', '>>{olddivorcecase} : It seems that he currently feels whatever Kushner is telling him to feel. Sociopaths don\'t have emotions. Kushner is better at optics that are mainstream, Bannon is good at revving up the "alt-right". Kushner seems to be "winning" the ratings data they ALL get from Cambridge Analytica. Real people are winning the media wars, currently.', ">>{olddivorcecase} : He has no emotions. It's what he does to act normal... watch how other people react. He sees visible cues, and then guages how to react. He often gets it very wrong... hence Alex Jones, Limbaugh, etal.", ">>{ripster65} : Now, I have to tell you, it's an unbelievably complex subject. Nobody knew presidenting could be so complicated.", '>>{SantaVsDevil} : Kushner holds no sway. If he did, Trump would distance him - not bring him closer.', ">>{veridique} : But babies drowning while fleeing the terror of war in Syria didn't move him?", ">>{olddivorcecase} : Kushner is a war hawk. He approved of the Yemen raid, so he didn't react. And he's a war hawk, so he reacted to this to get Trump emotional and involved. I still have no clue who planned and masterminded the 60 missiles that completely missed their mark and did nothing but spur Assad to use chlorine gas to kill more today. Trump is def a useful idiot.", '>>{olddivorcecase} : Trump has no idea how to "be normal". His two sons are idiots, Melania wants nothing to do with him, and the Tiffany and Barron\'s mothers keep them well-distanced. The "real person" he has left in his life is Ivanka. Kushner has all the sway.', ">>{banjist} : A quick google search brought up nothing. Do you have a source for more chemical attacks in Syria today? Edit: OK so Assad didn't do more chemical attacks today. Why lie about it OP?", ">>{Chic78} : Bullshit, if he was moved those refugee kids would be on Trumps' private planes headed to Disney World. That's what I'd be fucking doing if I had the power he does. Figuratively.", ">>{olddivorcecase} : Seriously, ILY. If you or I were in power; nobody would be scrapping for change for food or safety. We'd be supporting technological advances and providing a good basic needs, technology, and arts fueled life for everyone. This is where we were headed for when I was born (JFK). The inequality war needs to be fought and won now.", '>>{IHateYouPeople616} : Wherever that war will be won, it will not be won in America; perhaps in independent states with liberal leanings.', ">>{theryanmoore} : I haven't seen this, but it wouldn't surprise me at all. He's a pretty big fan of using chlorine gas on his own citizens and has been dropping horrible barrel bombs on northern Syria constantly for years, something Trump reacted to by saying that we shouldn't touch Syria and that we shouldn't help the refugees and that we shouldn't even let Syrians into the country at all. He was actually bizarrely consistent on nonintervention in Syria until yesterday. Shit, Tillerson said we wouldn't fuck with Assad like 4 days ago. I'd like to see something on today's chlorine gas attack though, assuming it's real. Would confirm my suspicions that Assad doesn't expect anything more from Trump and will continue with business as usual. I've heard it hypothesized that he may lay low for a bit though.", ">>{banjist} : Yeah it's not like I would be surprised, but I think OP is talking out his ass on this one. That doesn't help anyone.", ">>{theryanmoore} : True that. We have to be vigilant about facts because the other side clearly doesn't give a shit. This is an infuriating time in public life, trying to communicate through the massive clouds of complete bullshit that Trump and Russia have been kicking up to obscure their true motives."]]

classify and reply