Paragraph 10 appears to be an omnibus statement which contains a number of grounds including the question of incurring unauthorised expenditure with which alone we are concerned for the present, and may be extracted thus: "That the petitioner also states and contends that the election of Respondent No. 1 is liable to be declared void as he committed several corrupt practices, namely (1) the corrupt practice as defined in sub section (6) of section 123 of the Act, that is to say, incurring or authorising expenditure in contravention of section 77 of the Act; (2) the corrupt practice of bribery as defined in sub section (1) of section 123 of the Act; (3) the corrupt practice of hiring or procuring vehicles for the free conveyance of electors to and from certain polling stations within the said Assembly Constituency as defined in Section 123(5) of the Act.