Appellants, in support of their allegation of sub letting relied, particularly, on the Report 'and evidence of Sri S.K. Chhabra, Advocate Court Commissioner (A.W.I) who in his report substan tially corroborated appellants ' charge of sub letting; of Ram Lal Malhotra (A.W. 2.) and Inspector in the Enforcement Office who spoke to the notice stated to have been issued by the authorities in regard to the partitions effected in the premises to accommodate the Tailor and the Ice Cream Vendor; or Ravinder Pal Singh (A.W. 4) A customer of the Ice Cream Parlour who spoke about the exclusiveness of its possession, of Nirmal Singh (A.W. 5) who gave a similar account respecting the tailoring establishment; of Davinder Singh (A.W. 7), the husband of the first appellant and father of the second.