In the light of this Court 's decision Angurbala Mullick vs Debvbrata Mullick (2) in which it has been held that if a shebait dies leaving behind him a widow and no son she would succeed to the shebaiti right under the ordinary law but her rights in the shebaiti would be restricted in the same manner as they would have been if the successor was the son, which view reiterates the view expressed by the Privy Council in Bhabe Foririe Devi vs Ashalata Devi (3) that shebaiti is heritable property, the learned Single judge held that shebaiti is property and found that no restriction had been placed in the will of Asharfi Devi 's husband Purushottam Lal in regard to the shebaiti and, therefore, Asharfi Devi had (1 ) AIR .1974 SC (3) AIR 1943 PC 89 378 succeeded to the limited right of shebait as the heir of her husband and it became enlarged into an absolute right by section 14(1) of the and that as there was no other heir or successor to Purushottam Lal, Asharfi Devi 's appointment of the second respondent as the shebait under her will exhibit A 6 dated 21 12 57 is valid in law.