The payment may be substantially less than the market value, the principles may not be all inclusive, but the court would not, because it could not, upset the taking save where the principles of computation were too arbitrary and illusory to be unconscionably shocking." Thus, from a perusal of Bharati 's as also Karnataka cases the following principles for assessing compensation after the amendment of article 31 (2) by substitution of the word 'amount ', may be summarised: (1) that compensation should not be arbitrary or illusory, (2) that the amount fixed as compensation should not be unprincipled, (3) that the compensation sought to be paid should be so arbitrary or illusory as to be unconscionably shocking, and (4) it is not necessary that the compensation must represent the actual market value or be adequate, for even if compensation is inadequate but not illusory, the requirement of article 31 (2) is fully complied with.