The petitioners allege that their claims are similar to those made by M/s. Ripal Kumar & Co., and M/s. H. Patel & Co. who had filed writ petitions No. 2477 of 1984 and No. 1465 of 1984 respectively in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay for the issue of appropriate writs to the authorities to revalidate the Imprest Licences, that those writ petitions were allowed by the learned Single Judges of the High Court, whose decisions came to be affirmed in appeal by the Divi sion Bench; that Special Leave Petitions 4670 of 1986 and 7389 of 1985, respectively, preferred by the Union of India, against the said two judgments of the Bombay High Court were dismissed by this Court and that, therefore, the rejection by the authorities, of the petitioners ' claim for similar revalidation of the six Imprest Licences and endorsement for OGL items would, in view of grant of revalidation and en dorsement in those cases, be discriminatory and violative of Article 14.