But in order to understand the true scope and ambit of the controversy raised before us in regard to the constitutional validity of clause (5), it is necessary for us to refer also to the provision enacted in clause (3) of Article 371 D. Clauses (3) and (5) of Article 371 D read as follows: "The President may, by order, provide for the Constitution of an Administrative Tribunal for the State of Andhra Pra desh to exercise such jurisdiction, powers and authority including any jurisdiction, power and authority which imme diately before the commencement of the Constitution (Thirty Second Amendment) Act, 1973, was exerciseable by any Court (other than the Supreme Court) or by any Tribunal or other authority as may be specified in the order with re spect to the following matters, namely: (A) . . (B) . . (C) . . (5) The order of the Administrative Tribunal finally dis posing of any case shall become effective upon its confirma tion by the State Government or on the expiry of three months from the date on which the order is made.