In support of the appeal the learned Solicitor General submitted three points before us: (1)that as the cause of action of the plaintiff is based on the delayed delivery which arose at the most on January 1, 1962, the case of the plaintiff is covered by the provisions of the new Railways Act as amended by Act 39 of 1961, which is an exhaustive Code in itself providing a self contained machinery in order to determine the liability of the Railways and as the conditions mentioned in section 76 of the Railways Act have not been fulfilled the plaintiff is not entitled to any decree; (2)that at any rate since the plaintiff has claimed interest as damages, in the absence of any agreement providing for such an interest, the plaintiff 's claim is not actionable at law; and 508 (3) that the plaintiff could not claim for loss of profit or loss of market as the same is expressly barred by section 78(d) of the new Railways Act.