We would now indicate some of the apparent defects which were pointed out to us by the counsel for the appellant after giving a demonstration of the voting machine before us: "The absence of a provision for identifying the candidate for whom a void vote has been cast (a) by impersonating a dead voter, (b) by impersonating an absentee voter, (c) by the genuine voter who tenders a vote after a vote has been cast in his name by an impersonator (R. 42), (d) where a vote is void having been cast after closing time (R. 43) (e) where the voter has cast votes in more than one booth in the same constituency [section 62(2)], (f) where the voter has cast two votes in two constituencies [section 63(3)], (g) where the voter is disqualified under section 16 of the Act [section 62(4)], 91 (h) where an elector marks a ballot paper wrongly for a candidate, he loses the right to get a fresh ballot paper for casting his vote correctly (R.41).