This was, therefore, also rightly struck out from the award." These observations of Bose, J. gave rise to considerable difficulty in later cases, but in the series of cases, Nachiappa Chettier vs Subramaniam Chettier, ; ; Setinder Singh vs Amrao Singh, [1961] 3 264 SCR 676; Firm Madanlal Roshanlal Mahajan vs Hukumchand Mills Ltd., [1967] 1 SCR lO5; Union of India vs Bungo Steel Furniture Pvt. Ltd., [ ; and State of Madhya Pradesh vs M/s. Saith & Skelton Pvt. Ltd., ; , these observations have been explained and it was held that the observations never intended to lay down the broad and unqualified proposition that they appeared to lay down on a first impression.