Whatever the effect of that phrase may be, section 8 shows one perfectly clear that an appeal regarding compensation in a Land Acquisition case is not under Article 11 of Schedule II, because it is not a fixed fee at all . . " In Satya Charan Sur vs State of West Bengal, A.I.R. 1959 Calcutta 609 the High Court of Calcutta while following the decision in Ananda Lal Chakrabutty 's case (supra) expressly dissented from the view expressed in Hirji Virji Jangbari 's case (supra), After the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 came into force a similar question arose for consideration in C.B.G. Trust vs Union of India, [1970] Bombay Law Reporter, 4()7, regarding the proper court fee payable on an appeal filed against an award made under the Requisitioning Act.