As early (1) ; , 722 23. 63 as 1880, the Bombay High Court had held in Rai Manekbai vs Manekji Kavasji(1), that art 181 only relates to applications under the Code of Civil Procedure in which case no period of limitation has been prescribed for the application, and the consensus of judicial opinion on this point had been noticed by the Privy Council in Hansraj Gupta vs Official Liquidators, Dehra Dun Mussoorie Electric Tramway Company Ltd. (2) An attempt was no doubt made in the case of Sha Mulchand & Co. Ltd. vs Jawahar Mills Ltd.() to suggest that the amendment of article 158 and 178 ipso facto altered the meaning which had been attached to the words in article 181 by judicial decisions, but this attempt failed, because this Court held 'that the long catena of decisions under article 181 may well be said to have, as it were, added the words "u nder the Code" in the first column of that Article '.