This contention may be examined from three independent angles; 153 (1) Has Revenue Divisional Officer a discretion to grant time after being satisfied that a default is committed, to repair the default within the time considered reason able by him and so ordered by him ? (2) Has he a discretion to further extend the time if the defaulting tenant is unable to repair the default within the time fixed by him ? (3) What is the impact of answer of the aforementioned two questions on his jurisdiction to pass a composite order ? Section 3 and the relevant sub sections read as under: 3(1) Subject to the next succeeding sub sections, no cultivating tenant shall be evicted from his holding or any part thereof, by or at the instance of his landlord, whether in execution of a decree or order of a court or otherwise; X X X (4)(a) "Every landlord seeking to evict A cultivating tenant failing under sub section (2) shall, whether or not there is an order or decree of a court for the eviction of such cultivating tenant, make an application to the Revenue Divisional Officer and such application shall bear a Court fee stamp of one rupee." (4)(b) on receipt of such application, the Revenue Divisional Officer shall, after giving a reasonable opportunity to the landlord and the cultivating tenant to make their representations.