In other words, counsel contended that section 59 must, be read with section 64 of the and because of Rule 100 framed under section 64, section 59 becomes inapplicable to the respondents 300 falling within the exempted categories On the other hand, counsel for the respondents urged that the non obstante clause has the effect of keeping out of the way the exemption provisions, namely, section 64 read with Rule 100 and according to him such effect must follow from the ratio of this Court 's decision in case of B.P. Hira vs C.M. Pradhan (supra) and the Labour Court had rightly taken the view that because of the non obstante clause the respondents ' right to claim benefit of overtime wages under s 59 read with section 70 was not affected by the framing of rule 100 by the State Government in exercise of the power conferred on it under section 64.