image
imagewidth (px)
264
888
label
class label
2 classes
individual
uint8
1
55
figure
uint8
1
24
1forgeries
10
1
1forgeries
10
10
1forgeries
10
11
1forgeries
10
12
1forgeries
10
13
1forgeries
10
14
1forgeries
10
15
1forgeries
10
16
1forgeries
10
17
1forgeries
10
18
1forgeries
10
19
1forgeries
10
2
1forgeries
10
20
1forgeries
10
21
1forgeries
10
22
1forgeries
10
23
1forgeries
10
24
1forgeries
10
3
1forgeries
10
4
1forgeries
10
5
1forgeries
10
6
1forgeries
10
7
1forgeries
10
8
1forgeries
10
9
1forgeries
11
1
1forgeries
11
10
1forgeries
11
11
1forgeries
11
12
1forgeries
11
13
1forgeries
11
14
1forgeries
11
15
1forgeries
11
16
1forgeries
11
17
1forgeries
11
18
1forgeries
11
19
1forgeries
11
2
1forgeries
11
20
1forgeries
11
21
1forgeries
11
22
1forgeries
11
23
1forgeries
11
24
1forgeries
11
3
1forgeries
11
4
1forgeries
11
5
1forgeries
11
6
1forgeries
11
7
1forgeries
11
8
1forgeries
11
9
1forgeries
12
1
1forgeries
12
10
1forgeries
12
11
1forgeries
12
12
1forgeries
12
13
1forgeries
12
14
1forgeries
12
15
1forgeries
12
16
1forgeries
12
17
1forgeries
12
18
1forgeries
12
19
1forgeries
12
2
1forgeries
12
20
1forgeries
12
21
1forgeries
12
22
1forgeries
12
23
1forgeries
12
24
1forgeries
12
3
1forgeries
12
4
1forgeries
12
5
1forgeries
12
6
1forgeries
12
7
1forgeries
12
8
1forgeries
12
9
1forgeries
13
1
1forgeries
13
10
1forgeries
13
11
1forgeries
13
12
1forgeries
13
13
1forgeries
13
14
1forgeries
13
15
1forgeries
13
16
1forgeries
13
17
1forgeries
13
18
1forgeries
13
19
1forgeries
13
2
1forgeries
13
20
1forgeries
13
21
1forgeries
13
22
1forgeries
13
23
1forgeries
13
24
1forgeries
13
3
1forgeries
13
4
1forgeries
13
5
1forgeries
13
6
1forgeries
13
7
1forgeries
13
8
1forgeries
13
9
1forgeries
14
1
1forgeries
14
10
1forgeries
14
11
1forgeries
14
12

Individuality Of Handwriting (CEDAR)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12136998/
https://cedar.buffalo.edu/NIJ/projectinfo.html

Abstract

Motivated by several rulings in United States courts concerning expert testimony in general, and handwriting testimony in particular, we undertook a study to objectively validate the hypothesis that handwriting is individual. Handwriting samples of 1,500 individuals, representative of the U.S. population with respect to gender, age, ethnic groups, etc., were obtained. Analyzing differences in handwriting was done by using computer algorithms for extracting features from scanned images of handwriting. Attributes characteristic of the handwriting were obtained, e.g., line separation, slant, character shapes, etc. These attributes, which are a subset of attributes used by forensic document examiners (FDEs), were used to quantitatively establish individuality by using machine learning approaches. Using global attributes of handwriting and very few characters in the writing, the ability to determine the writer with a high degree of confidence was established. The work is a step towards providing scientific support for admitting handwriting evidence in court. The mathematical approach and the resulting software also have the promise of aiding the FDE.

Srihari SN, Cha SH, Arora H, Lee S. Individuality of handwriting. J Forensic Sci. 2002 Jul;47(4):856-72. PMID: 12136998.

Downloads last month
10
Edit dataset card