aleksa-codes

/

flux-ghibsky-illustration

like 164

Hi there @ftopal ,

Thank you for your interest! The images I used for training were sourced from an Instagram page that focuses on AI-generated content. The owner of that page has kept their methods quite secretive, and I believe they may have used Leonardo AI to create those images. While I’d love to share more details, the page itself is a core part of my approach, so I can’t disclose its exact name.

The training was primarily an experiment to see if I could replicate the style of that page. In the future, I plan to fine-tune the model further by selectively retraining it on its best outputs, which I’ll choose manually.

Thanks again for reaching out, and feel free to ask if you have any more questions!

Hi @aleksa-codes

Thanks for your reply! I was wondering if you are planning to provide this SD 3.5 as well. That was my reason for asking. I do like image styles and would love to see it in other architectures as well.

Hi @ftopal ,

Yes, I'm considering it now that I see people having interest in this LoRA/style. I haven't tested SD 3.5 myself yet, so I’m curious about its performance compared to Flux. Have you had the chance to experiment with SD 3.5? I’d love to hear if you think it’s noticeably better.

Also, I noticed that a new LoRA trainer for SD 3.5 was recently released on Replicate, which could streamline this process: SD 3.5 fine-tuner by lucataco.

Really depends on the use case, i know some people are into exceptional realistic images and having better human anatomy and there FLUX seems to be better but for this image style, it's hard to say. That's why i wanted to like compare and see how both of them look.