raw/RetroMay.csv

"userwithid","question","response"
"Primary User-10270","To improve our execution what should we add?","* Platform: Identify critical tasks that could impact multiple teams and plan activity to complete early in the release if possible.
* Cleanup of stale records"
"Primary User-10270","What went well in this release?","* Product attributes and filtering
* Lots of infra enhancements: CDKv2, Gitlab runner operationalisation, VPN
* Admin gateway and retool integration
* 800+ points in lats sprint of 0.9.11"
"Primary User-10270","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10270","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10270","What didn't go well in this release?","* Deployment issues due to cdkv2: this was kind of expected but it majorly threw us off when synth works fine but deployment fails. 
* DB changelog lock issues occurring twice within a week in integration and impacting stage deployment of pulse-manager
* DB migration to aurora is not complete yet: partly due to prioritization (snowflake over DB migration) and also due to heavy usage of integration env during last 2 sprints of a release. this task could have been planned better"
"Primary User-10271","What went well in this release?","-Automating few release features in development sprint. 
-Fixing ST tear down and few other issues to run the test cases in parallel ."
"Primary User-10271","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10271","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10273","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10273","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10276","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10276","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","Good"
"Primary User-10278","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10278","What went well in this release?","- Increased system test coverage
- Early test planning and system tests for release features
- Effective collaboration and communication between the QA team, development team, and other stakeholders throughout the release
- Low Defect density"
"Primary User-10278","What didn't go well in this release?","Systest failures on int is not attended
P2 issues triaging of previous releases"
"Primary User-10278","To improve our execution what should we add?","Progress of release should be made available for all. Items included or excluded dynamically should be captured/documented"
"Primary User-10278","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","Very Good"
"Primary User-10278","As a member of the product management team, please explain your choice in the previous response.","NA"
"Primary User-10278","Can you please suggest any improvements to the structure/agenda of the meetings you typically attend?","Weekly sprint retro->We can have new set of questions on lessons learned, collaboration and new practices followed that proved beneficial to team's productivity"
"Primary User-10284","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Crystal clear"
"Primary User-10284","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10284","To improve our execution what should we add?","As discussed on slack, we can try to focus more on reviewing and testing the parts which seem to be a major change before stage/prod deployments."
"Primary User-10284","What didn't go well in this release?","Database and deployment issues (but was a good learning experience)."
"Primary User-10284","What went well in this release?","Faced some issues with deployments and DB related queries, but on the positive side were a good learning experience. All in all got to know a few new database related things."
"Primary User-10284","Please comment on requirement clarity, more so if the requirements were NOT mostly clear OR crystal clear.","The designs were ready beforehand but more importantly were very detailed. Also, thanks to @Anandhi and @Meaghan for replying actively on Figma to any doubts or clarifications (mainly the Pulse List Updates)."
"Primary User-10285","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10285","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Crystal clear"
"Primary User-10285","What went well in this release?","Clear requirements,  Good feedback from design review"
"Primary User-10286","To improve our execution what should we add?","- Verify DB migration with stage and prod DB data dumps so we do not see surprises during deployment 
- API validations so system tests cannot introduce bad data
- Review and update alerts proactively , may be a person per release owns this"
"Primary User-10286","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10286","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10286","What went well in this release?","- Aligned better to the jobs to be done for the quarter in the current release
- Thanks to Ritu, Guru, Pradeep, Sanjeev and Shivam for helping out with some of the collab areas t ospped up delivery in 0.9.12"
"Primary User-10286","What didn't go well in this release?","- The deployment issues to stage for collab services
- One of the customer issues not caught by our alerts"
"Primary User-10288","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10288","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10290","What went well in this release?",""
"Primary User-10290","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10290","Please comment on requirement clarity, more so if the requirements were NOT mostly clear OR crystal clear.",""
"Primary User-10290","Can you please suggest any improvements to the structure/agenda of the meetings you typically attend?",""
"Primary User-10290","As a member of the product management team, please explain your choice in the previous response.",""
"Primary User-10290","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10290","To improve our execution what should we DROP?",""
"Primary User-10290","To improve our execution what should we add?",""
"Primary User-10290","What didn't go well in this release?",""
"Primary User-10291","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10291","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10291","What went well in this release?","1. Venkat has joined the UI team and has started contributing to the release. he has helped fixing the issues identified dev testing on teams iframe redesign.
2. We have started to use LD flag for most of the UI features wherever we can."
"Primary User-10292","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","Very Good"
"Primary User-10292","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10292","What went well in this release?","Releasing lambdas and creating a release process for them went well"
"Primary User-10293","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","N/A"
"Primary User-10293","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10293","What went well in this release?","Some of the teams were not loaded fully during the early part of the release but as the sprints progressed the teams were loaded better."
"Primary User-10294","Can you please suggest any improvements to the structure/agenda of the meetings you typically attend?","NA"
"Primary User-10294","What didn't go well in this release?","NA"
"Primary User-10294","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10294","As a member of the product management team, please explain your choice in the previous response.","NA"
"Primary User-10294","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10294","To improve our execution what should we add?","NA"
"Primary User-10294","To improve our execution what should we DROP?","NA"
"Primary User-10299","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10299","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10300","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10300","Please comment on requirement clarity, more so if the requirements were NOT mostly clear OR crystal clear.","Figma spec for new pulse list was crystal clear. Thanks to meaghan. "
"Primary User-10300","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10301","What didn't go well in this release?","Too many parallel changes related to pulsing by multiple developers in similar classes, causing a lot of time to be spent in resolving merge conflicts."
"Primary User-10301","What went well in this release?","Pulses UX changed, reminders added. 
Backend re-design of pulse scheduling done along with the ongoing changes for user timezone based delivery ."
"Primary User-10301","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10301","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","Good"
"Primary User-10302","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10302","Can you please suggest any improvements to the structure/agenda of the meetings you typically attend?","N/A"
"Primary User-10302","As a member of the product management team, please explain your choice in the previous response.","N/A"
"Primary User-10302","To improve our execution what should we DROP?","Nothing much"
"Primary User-10302","To improve our execution what should we add?","1. Presence of service owner during the stage or production deployment process, especially in cases where significant changes in service has occurred.
2. We can add happiness score indicator in retro(Overall happiness - includes everything )."
"Primary User-10302","What didn't go well in this release?","Context switch between services ate little time ."
"Primary User-10302","What went well in this release?","Got chance to work on collab services ."
"Primary User-10302","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10303","What didn't go well in this release?","There is some un-planned work like Imply Polaris, even though it is a small size effort, in a small team it has its impact.
Our evaluation on vector databases also expanded a little bit due to the new features in OpenSearch, Postgres etc."
"Primary User-10303","To improve our execution what should we add?","N/A"
"Primary User-10303","Can you please suggest any improvements to the structure/agenda of the meetings you typically attend?","For some of the meetings like SOS meetings, we need to make sure we have representation from all teams including PM teams."
"Primary User-10303","You rated the ${DimensionName} of ${ProductName} poorly, can you please elaborate?","N/A"
"Primary User-10303","As a member of the product management team, please explain your choice in the previous response.","N/A"
"Primary User-10303","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-10303","To improve our execution what should we DROP?","N/A"
"Primary User-10303","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10303","Please comment on requirement clarity, more so if the requirements were NOT mostly clear OR crystal clear.","We have very clear goals for the quarter but we are running behind on Q2 plans a little bit because most of the specs are getting ready now to start execution."
"Primary User-10303","What went well in this release?","In data team most of the cycles we spent on research spikes for the NLP based chat interface. We have overall design to use NLP in various use cases like Chat interface, Pulse question generation and Reports."
"Primary User-10983","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-10983","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","Good"
"Primary User-12741","To improve our execution what should we add?","We should have execution by squad in the same view as the release plans, so when there is a disconnect is it highlighted and we are able to resolve it autonymously."
"Primary User-12741","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","Moderate"
"Primary User-12741","As a member of the product management team, please explain your choice in the previous response.","Some of the Q2 items (smart pulse, onboarding, pulse list update, gamification - in 0.9.12) took more effort than expected and had longer lead times. These are all going to be fairly low impact in the near term. I had expected them to be S/M sized projects that we could crank through in a sprint or two. I would like us to look at doing fewer things but fitting those into releases rather than doing more things. That will also help where the Product team is constrained in some resources (UX, product)."
"Primary User-12741","Can you please suggest any improvements to the structure/agenda of the meetings you typically attend?","We need to bring a view of project dependencies into the release plan. The goal being to optimize for fewer projects that have shorter lead time by being able to resolve dependencies within the same release due to excess capacity. It would also be helpful to have eng drive some product changes so that we are innovating and taking bets so having a way to surface some % of capacity going to true eng-driven product ideas is where we could put excess capacity."
"Primary User-12741","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","N/A"
"Primary User-12795","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","50-50"
"Primary User-12795","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","Moderate"
"Primary User-18439","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","Good"
"Primary User-18439","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","Mostly clear"
"Primary User-18440","As a member of the Product Management team, how do you rate the quality and payload size of the release?","N/A"
"Primary User-18440","Were the requirements clear at the time you picked up your tasks?","N/A"