Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
File size: 57,726 Bytes
8650c17 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 |
Received: 22 September 2017 | Accepted: 12 December 2017 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13524 O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E Propofol exposure during early gestation impairs learning and memory in rat offspring by inhibiting the acetylation of histone Jiamei Lin1,2 | Shengqiang Wang1 | Yunlin Feng1 | Weihong Zhao1 | Weilu Zhao1 | Foquan Luo1 | Namin Feng1 1Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China Abstract Propofol is widely used in clinical practice, including non-obstetric surgery in preg- 2Department of Anesthesiology, the Eastern Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China nant women. Previously, we found that propofol anaesthesia in maternal rats during the third trimester (E18) caused learning and memory impairment to the offspring Correspondence Foquan Luo Email: lfqjxmc@outlook.com rats, but how about the exposure during early pregnancy and the underlying mecha- nisms? Histone acetylation plays an important role in synaptic plasticity. study, propofol was administered to the pregnant rats in the early pregnancy (E7). In this Funding information Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, Grant/Award Number: 20132BAB205022, 20171ACB20030; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 81060093, 81460175 The learning and memory function of the offspring were tested by Morris water maze (MWM) test on post-natal day 30. Two hours before each MWM trial, histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), Senegenin (SEN, traditional Chinese medicine), hippyragranin (HGN) antisense oligonucleotide (HGNA) or vehicle were given to the offspring. The protein levels of HDAC2, acety- lated histone 3 (H3) and 4 (H4), cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) response element-binding protein (CREB), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) 2 subunit B (NR2B), HGN and synaptophysin in offspring’s hippocampus were determined by Western blot or immunofluorescence test. It was discovered that infusion with propofol in maternal rats on E7 leads to impairment of learning and memory in off- spring, increased the protein levels of HDAC2 and HGN, decreased the levels of acetylated H3 and H4 and phosphorylated CREB, NR2B and synaptophysin. HDAC2 inhibitor SAHA, Senegenin or HGN antisense oligonucleotide reversed all the changes. Thus, present results indicate exposure to propofol during the early gesta- tion impairs offspring’s learning and memory via inhibiting histone acetylation. SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide might have therapeutic value for the adverse effect of propofol. K E Y W O R D S histone deacetylase, learning and memory, pregnancy, propofol Jiamei Lin and Shengqiang Wang contributed equally to this work (co-first author). - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2600 | wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jcmm J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:2600–2611. 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License | 2601 LIN ET AL. 1 | I N T R O D U C T I O N mainly targeting HDAC2, probably has therapeutic potentialities for the learning impairment caused by neurodegenerative diseases.22-24 Histone deacetylase inhibitors facilitated synaptic plasticity and Accumulating evidence indicates general anaesthetics exposure dur- memory by promoting the combination of CREB with CREB-binding ing pregnancy may cause neurotoxic effects and induce persistent cognitive dysfunction of offspring rats.1-3 Propofol is commonly used in pregnancy for non-obstetric surgery. Xiong et al4 showed that protein (CBP) domain, which subsequently activate CREB-mediated transcription.25-27 Our early researches showed that anaesthesia dur- ing early gestation damaged the neurons and reduced the expression anaesthesia with propofol on gestational day 18 (E18) associated of NR2B in hippocampus, thus leading to learning and memory impairments in offspring rats.11,12 In this study, we aim to investigate with the up-regulation of caspase-3 and the loss of neurons, as well as associated with the down-regulation synaptophysin expression in offspring rats’ hippocampus and caused persistent spatial whether histone acetylation involves in the cognitive function learning impairment induced by propofol anaesthesia during early pregnancy. impairment in offspring. Our previous study showed that propofol anaesthesia in the second trimester inhibits the cognitive function of the offspring that is related to down-regulation of the protein levels 2 | M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and synaptophysin in offspring hippocampus.5 Exposure to propofol for 5 hour caused 2.1 | Drugs death of neurons and oligodendrocytes in foetal and neonatal NHP brain.6 However, little attention was paid to the early stage of gesta- tion, which is equivalent to the early pregnancy of human.7 It is All drugs were prepared just before use: propofol (Diprivan; AstraZe- Italy: jc393, 20 mL: 200 mg); 20% intralipid neca UK limited, (2B6061; Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA); SAHA (Selleck Chemicals LLC, reported that 0.75% to 2% gestational women have to experience non-obstetric surgery due to various medical problems.8 This number Houston, TX, USA). HGN antisense was synthesized by Sangon Bio- tech (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. Senegenin (purity ≥ 98%) was pur- is increasing with the development of laparoscopic technique, and chased from Nanjing SenBeiJia Biological Technology Co., Ltd. the most common surgical procedure performed in the early preg- nancy is laparoscopy.9 It is reported that about 28% of the non- obstetric surgeries occurred in the first trimester.10 Our earlier stud- (Jiangsu province, China). Anti-b-actin and anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Cell Signaling Tech, MA, ies demonstrated that propofol, ketamine, enflurane, isoflurane or USA). Anti-CREB (Phospho S133), anti-NMDAR2B, anti-HDAC2, sevoflurane anaesthesia in the early pregnancy inhibits the cognitive antisynaptophysin, anti-Ac-H4K12 and anti-Ac-H3K14 antibodies function, damages hippocampal neurons, reduces NR2B mRNA and increased HGN mRNA levels in offspring rats’ hippocampus,11-14 but were purchased from Abcam (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Anti- HGN antibody was synthesized by Kitgen Bio-tech Co., Ltd.(Zhejiang the underlying pathogenesis needs to be clarified. province, China). is considered the cellular mecha- nism of memory formation and plays a role in synaptic plasticity.15 Long-term potentiation (LTP) NR2B is an important positive regulator of learning and memory by promoting synaptic plasticity and LTP.16,17 The balance between 2.2 | Animals The protocol in this study was approved by the institutional review positive and negative learning and memory-regulating genes and pro- board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University on the teins is key to the formation, maintenance, as well as retrieval of Use of Animals in Research and Teaching. All the methods in this memory. HGN is a negative regulating protein that highly expresses study were performed in co-ordination with relevant guidelines and in hippocampus, acting suppression/clearance function in memory regulating.18 Inhibiting HGN by antisense oligonucleotide induces an regulations. Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from the ani- mal science research department of the Jiangxi Traditional Chinese increase in performance of Morris water maze and LTP. This indi- Medicine College (JZDWNO: 2011-0030; Nanchang, Jiangxi,China). cates that HGN negatively regulates synaptic plasticity and LTP and The learning and memory functions of the parental rats were plays negative regulating role in the formation and maintenance of assessed using the Morris water maze (MWM) system before mating, memory. so that to minimize the hereditary difference. Animals were housed Persistent changes in synapses, which based on appropriate gene separately under standard laboratory conditions with 12:12 light/ dark cycle, 24 (cid:1) 1°C and had free access to tap water. Two female transcription and subsequent protein synthesis, are the structural basis of learning and memory processes.19 Both compact chromatin rats in cages with one male rat per cage for mating. Pregnancy was structure and the accessibility of DNA to target genes can be modu- diagnosed by the sign of vaginal plug. lated by chromatin remodelling, in particular, histone tail acetylation, thus to regulate their expression.20,21 Histone acetylation regulates by acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). 2.3 | Drug treatment HATs serve as transcriptional activators, whereas HDACs serve as rats received intravenous infusion of propo- (n = 10 dams) with the rate of 20 mg kg(cid:3)1 h(cid:3)1 for 4 hours, On E7, pregnant transcriptional repressors. Increased HDAC activity had been linked fol to neurodegeneration. Growing evidence indicated that SAHA, which 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License 2602 | LIN ET AL. equal volume of saline (n = 10 dams) or intralipid (n = 5 dams), previously described,18,29 once daily for seven consecutive days before MWM trial. respectively. Electrocardiograms, saturation of pulse oximetry (SpO2) and tail non-invasive blood pressure were continuously monitored during 2.4 | Morris water maze test maternal propofol exposure. Using heating lamp and temperature the rectal to monitor Spatial learning and memory were assessed by the MWM test from post-natal day 30 (P30) to P36 according to previously described5,30 temperature and keep it at controller 37 (cid:1) 0.5°C. Arterial blood sampling from lateral caudal artery for with SLY-WMS Morris water maze test system (Beijing Sunny Instru- ments Co. Ltd., Beijing, China). Briefly, the trials start at 9 o’clock in blood gas analysis at the end of propofol anaesthesia. If the total time of SpO2 <95% and/or the systolic blood pressure <80% of the the morning in the MWM system with the pool was filled with baseline in excess of 5 minutes, the pregnant rat was got rid of the study, and other pregnant rats were chosen to supply the sample water to a height of 1.0 cm above the top of a 15-cm-diameter plat- size, so as to exclude the interfering effect of maternal hypotension form, in the second quadrant (target quadrant), and the water main- tained at 24 (cid:1) 1°C. The training trial was performed once a day for or hypoxia on cognitive function in the pup rats. six consecutive days. In each training trial, offspring rats were placed After delivery, the offspring rats born to the same pregnant rat were randomly subdivided into the SAHA, SEN, HGNA group and in the water facing the wall of the pool in the third quadrant, the their relative control groups (DMSO, NS(1) and NS(2) group, respec- farthest one from the target quadrant. The animals were allowed to tively; Figure 1). It has been proved that the acetylation level of his- search for the hidden platform or for 120 seconds. They were after increased 2 hour the tone in hippocampus obviously administration of HDAC inhibitor.27 Therefore, 90 mg kg(cid:3)1 SAHA (HDAC inhibitor), at a concentration of 0.6 lmol L(cid:3)1 dissolved into dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) was injected to the offspring in SAHA allowed to remain on the platform for 30 seconds when they found the platform and the time for the animal to find the platform was recorded as escape latency (indicating learning ability). For those who did not find the platform within 120 seconds, the animals were group by the intraperitoneal route at 2 hours before each MWM gently guided to the platform and allowed to stay there for 30 sec- onds, and their escape latency was recorded as 120 seconds. At the trial. The same volume of DMSO was given to the DMSO group. Senegenin, a kind of Chinese medicine, was proved to up-regulate end of the reference training (P37), the platform was removed. The offspring rats were allowed to perform spatial probe test (memory the expression of NR2B mRNA and protein, thus to mitigate cogni- tive dysfunction.28 So, 15 mg kg(cid:3)1 Senegenin and equal volume of saline were given intraperitoneally at 2 hours before each MWM function test) for 120 seconds. Times across the platform (platform crossing times, indicate memory function), the swimming trail and speed were automatically recorded by the system. The mean value trial to SEN or NS(1) groups, respectively. HGN antisense oligonu- cleotide (0.25 nmol lL(cid:3)1, 1.5 lL) or normal saline (1.5 lL) was injected to offspring’s hippocampus in HGNA or NS(2) group as of the platform crossing times, escape latency and speed of the off- spring born to the same pregnant rats was taken as the final results. F I G U R E 1 Experimental design. Pregnant dams were exposed to Propofol, 20% Intralipid or normal saline on E7, and the offspring were treated with SAHA, Senegenin, HGNA or vehicles two hours before behavioural testing. The number in parentheses represents the number of animals: F, female; M, male; SAHA, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, also known as vorinostat; DMSO, dimethyl sulphoxide; SEN, Senegenin; NS(1), Normal saline intraperitoneal injection; NS(2), Normal saline intrahippocampus injection; HGNA, HGN antisense oligonucleotide 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License | 2603 LIN ET AL. green light, while the DAPI was performed by UV blue light. All images were recorded at 10 9 209 (Exp Acq-700mmm, Offset Acq- 2.5 | Brain hippocampus harvest 1, Gain Acq-1, Gamma Acq-300). The density of HDCA2 and p- The day after the MWM test, rats were anaesthetized with isoflu- rane and killed by cervical dislocation. Hippocampus tissues were CREB staining was conducted on the images using Image-Pro Plus harvested and stored in Eppendorf tubes that had been treated with 1% DEPC and were stored at (cid:3)80°C (for Western blot analyses) or 6.0 (Media Cybernetics Inc., USA). The images were converted it into black and white pictures. After intensity calibration, hippocampal CA1 area was chosen to analyse and the integrated optical density immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde (for immunofluorescence assay). (IOD) was measured. IOD/Area was calculated as the protein expres- sion level. 2.6 | Western blot analysis The hippocampus (n = 6, with three male and three female offspring 2.8 | Statistical analysis rats from each group) were homogenized on ice in lysis buffer con- All analyses were performed with SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., taining a protease inhibitors cocktail. Protein concentration was Chicago, IL, USA). Data from escape latency in the MWM test were determined by the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit. Protein sam- ples (20 lg) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacry- subjected to a repeated measures two-way analysis of variance (RM lamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a PVDF two-way ANOVA) and were followed by least significant difference t membrane. The membranes were blocked by non-fat dry milk buffer for 1.5 h and then incubated overnight at 4°C with antihistone H3 (LSD-t) analysis when a significant overall between-subject factor was found (P < 0.05). Data from Western blot and immunofluores- cence staining results were subjected to one-way ANOVA analysis. (acetyl K14) (1:10000), anti- (1:2000), antihistone H4 (acetyl K12) NMDAR2B antisynaptophysin (1:10000) and anti-b-actin (1:2000), respectively. Thereafter, the All data well provided for any of the variables. The LSD t test was anti-HGN (1:1000), (1:1000), used to determine the difference between groups. Statistical signifi- cance was declared at P < .05. membranes were washed three times with TBS-T buffer for 15 min- utes and incubated with the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conju- gated secondary antibody for 2 hours at room temperature. The 3 | R E S U L T S immune complexes were washed three times with TBS-T buffer and detected using the ECL system (Millipore Corporation, MA, USA). 3.1 | Physiological parameters of maternal propofol anaesthesia The images of Western blot products were collected and analysed (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, by ImageJ 1.50i During propofol infusion, the maternal body temperature, respiratory USA). The density of observed protein band was normalized to that of b-actin in the same sample. The results of offspring from all the rate, arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate and non-invasive blood other group were then normalized to the average values of normal saline control offspring (control+NS group) in the same Western blot. pressure were continuously monitored and recorded every five min- utes. No significant change in these physiological parameters had The mean expression level of all of the offspring born to the same been seen during propofol exposure (4 hours). Tail artery blood was collected from pregnant rats for blood gas analysis after propofol perfusion, and no significant difference (P > .05) was observed mother rat in the same group was calculated as the final expression level of the observed proteins. (Table 1). These results suggested that propofol has no side effect indicating the on the physiological parameters in pregnant rats, 2.7 | Immunofluorescence staining Immunofluorescence staining was used to assess HDAC2 and phos- pho-CREB in the hippocampus of offspring rats after the MWM test. Hippocampus from offspring rats (n = 6, with three male and three T A B L E 1 Maternal arterial blood gas at the end of propofol exposure or normal saline (n = 10, mean (cid:1) SD) female offspring rats from each group) were fixated in paraformalde- hyde. Five-lm frozen sections of the hippocampus were used for Normal Saline exposure pregnant rats Propofol exposure pregnant rats Indexes the immunofluorescence staining. The sections were incubated with 7.39 (cid:1) 0.04 7.38 (cid:1) 0.05 pH anti-HDAC2 (1:300) and anti-CREB (1:100) dissolved in 1% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline at 4°C overnight. Then, 94.00 (cid:1) 3.52 97.17 (cid:1) 3.49 PO2 (mm Hg) 45.33 (cid:1) 2.88 the sections were incubated with fluorescent-conjugated anti-rabbit 44.83 (cid:1) 5.78 PCO2 (mm Hg) HCO(cid:3) K+ (mmol L(cid:3)1) Na+ (mmol L(cid:3)1) Ca2+ (mmol L(cid:3)1) 3 (mmol L(cid:3)1) secondary antibody (1:300) for 1 hour in the dark at room tempera- 27.95 (cid:1) 3.21 26.68 (cid:1) 2.32 ture. Negative control sections were incubated with PBS as a substi- 3.48 (cid:1) 0.29 3.47 (cid:1) 0.39 tute for primary antibody. Finally, the sections were wet mounted 141.67 (cid:1) 1.03 140.83 (cid:1) 1.47 and viewed immediately using a inverted fluorescence microscope (2009) 1.38 (cid:1) 0.05 1.34 (cid:1) 0.03 (Olympus, Japan). The target protein was red, and nuclei 9.18 (cid:1) 0.99 9.57 (cid:1) 0.55 Glu were blue. The proteins of HDAC2 and p-CREB were excited by the 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License 2604 | LIN ET AL. results of offspring rats in this study are likely caused directly by the data of offspring from normal saline and intralipid infusion group into one control group in the following data analysis. Propofol expo- propofol rather than secondary effects of maternal propofol infusion. sure increased escape latency, while decreased platform crossing times in offspring compared to the saline control condition (Fig- ure 3C,D, P < .05), 3.2 | Physical features of the offspring indicating propofol anaesthesia on E7 impairs spatial learning and memory in offspring. The birth rate (total number of neonates born to each mother rat), sur- vival rate (survived more than 30 days), gender ratio (the ratio of SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide have been shown to improve learning and memory by facilitating histone acety- females to males) and the average weight of the offspring on day P30 lation, increasing NR2B expression and inhibiting HGN expression, respectively.18,27,28 Therefore, we assessed whether they can amelio- in propofol exposure group were not significantly different from nor- mal saline control group (Figure 2). Dyskinesia was not observed in either of the two groups. These results indicate that maternal propofol rate the learning and memory impairment caused by propofol expo- anaesthesia at the early pregnant stage (E7) has no significant effects sure during pregnancy. Based on the previous discovery on the pharmacodynamics,18,27,28 SAHA or Senegenin was intraperitoneally on physical development of offspring rats, indicating the differences in injected into the offspring 2 hours before each MWM test, while learning and memory observed in this study are caused by propofol HGN antisense oligonucleotide was injected into hippocampus exposure during pregnancy rather than physical differences. 2 hours before each MWM test. The results showed that SAHA, Senegenin or HGN antisense oligonucleotide treatment ameliorated 3.3 | and the ameliorating effect of SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide Impaired learning and memory in offspring the cognitive function deficit caused by propofol exposure during pregnancy (Figure 4A-F, P < .05). SAHA, Senegenin or HGN anti- sense oligonucleotide had no obvious effect on the learning and There was no obvious difference in offspring between normal saline memory in offspring that had not exposed to propofol during preg- and intralipid infusion group (Figure 3C,D). Therefore, we merged nancy (Figure 4A-F). F I G U R E 2 Maternal propofol exposure had no effect on the physical features of the offspring rats. The physical features of the offspring rats between propofol exposure and normal saline control group had no significant difference (P > .05). A, The birth rate (average litter size, total number of neonates born to each mother rat). B, Survival rate of offspring (survived more than 30 days). C, Gender ratio (the ratio of females to males, gender composition). D, The average weight of the offspring on day P30 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License | 2605 LIN ET AL. F I G U R E 3 Maternal Propofol exposure impaired learning and memory in offspring. Post-natal thirty days (P30), the learning and memory were assessed using the Morris water maze (mean (cid:1) SD). A, Escape latency (indicating learning ability) among control groups. B, Platform crossing times (indicating memory ability) among control groups. C, Propofol exposure increased escape latency in offspring compared to the saline control condition (*P < .05). No statistically significant difference was observed between the saline control and intralipid group. D, Propofol exposure decreased platform crossing times in offspring compared to the saline control condition (*P < .05). No significant difference was observed between the saline control and intralipid group F I G U R E 4 SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment mitigated the learning and memory impairment (mean (cid:1) SD). A, Propofol exposure increased the escape latency in offspring compared to the control condition (*P < .05), and SAHA treatment significantly reversed the effect (#P < .05). B, SEN treatment significantly reversed the effect (#P < .05). C, HGNA treatment significantly reversed the effect (#P < .05). D, Propofol exposure decreased the platform crossing times in offspring compared with the control condition (*P<.05), and SAHA treatment reversed the effect (#P < .05). E, SEN treatment reversed the effect caused by propofol exposure (#P < .05). F, HGNA treatment reversed the effect caused by propofol exposure (#P < .05), and SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment had no significant effect on learning and memory in offspring that were not exposed to propofol during pregnancy. Error bar = SD (HDACs) and histone acetyltransferases (HATs).33,34 HATs acetylate 3.4 | Reduced histone acetylation levels and the mitigating effect of SAHA,Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide multiple lysine residues on histones, and different acetylated sites result in different downstream biological effects. H3K14 and H4K12 acetylation have been shown to play a crucial part in learning, mem- ory and synaptic plasticity.35 The results showed that propofol expo- Histone deacetylation was implicated in memory impairments.31,32 The acetylation of histone is regulated by histone deacetylases sure during pregnancy up-regulated HDAC2 protein expression in 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License 2606 | LIN ET AL. offspring rat’s hippocampus (Figure 6, P < .05), whereas decreased and maintenance.37 NR2B is critical positive regulating factor,38 while HGN is considered as an important recognized as the acetylation levels of H3K14 and H4K12 significantly (Figure 5, P < .05). SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide alle- viated these changes (Figures 5 and 6, P < .05). These results indi- factor.18 The negative results in this study showed that propofol anaesthesia during pregnancy resulted in decrease in NR2B protein (Figure 8A, P < .05), while increased the level of HGN protein (Figure 8B, P < .05), resulted in decreased ratio of NR2B/HGN in offspring rats’ hippocampus (Figure 8C, P < 0.05). cate that propofol anaesthesia during pregnancy inhibits histone acetylation in offspring rats’ hippocampus, which could be alleviated by SAHA, Senegenin or HGN antisense oligonucleotide. The ratio of NR2B/HGN was reversed significantly by SAHA, or HGN antisense oligonucleotide Senegenin P < .05). (Figure 8A-C, 3.5 | Decreased phosphorylated CREB levels in hippocampus and the mitigating effect of SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide 3.7 | Down-regulated expression of synaptophysin in the hippocampus of offspring rats and the improving effect of SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide Phosphorylation of CREB is recognized as a molecular marker of mem- ory processing in the hippocampus for spatial learning.36 Therefore, we investigated the phosphorylation of CREB in this study. The results showed that propofol anaesthesia during pregnancy resulted in decrease in phospho-CREB protein in offspring rats’ hippocampus. Synaptophysin plays an important role in the exocytosis of SAHA, Senegenin or HGN antisense oligonucleotide treatment allevi- ated the effects (Figure 7, P < .05). These results suggest that propofol synaptic vesicles and acknowledged as a marker of synaptic density.39 Synapse loss is closely associated with cognitive dys- function and learning impairment.40,41 The results showed that the anaesthesia during pregnancy on E7 can down-regulate the phosphory- lation of CREB in hippocampus of the offspring, whereas SAHA, Sene- protein level of synaptophysin in maternal propofol exposure lower than control condition (Figure 9), group was indicating genin or HGN antisense oligonucleotide ameliorates this effect. maternal propofol exposure on E7 impairs the synaptic plasticity in offspring rats’ hippocampus, whereas the level of synaptophysin 3.6 | Decreased the ratio of NR2B/HGN in offspring rat’s hippocampus and the reversing effect of SAHA, Senegenin or HGN antisense oligonucleotide in SAHA, Senegenin or HGN antisense oligonucleotide-treated group was higher than propofol exposure group (Figure 9), sug- gesting that SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide The balance between positive and negative regulating factors can reverse the down-regulated expression of synaptophysin of learning and memory plays a key role in the memory obtain caused by propofol. F I G U R E 5 Maternal propofol exposure reduced the level of histone acetylation and the reversed effect of SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment. Acetylation level of H3K14 and H4K12 was detected by Western blot (mean (cid:1) SD). Maternal exposure to propofol decreased the acetylation level of H3K14 and H4K12 in offspring compared to the control condition (P < .001), and SAHA treatment significantly increased acetylated H3K14 (P = .016) and H4K12 (P = .003) levels; SEN treatment significantly increased acetylated H3K14 (P = .012) and H4K12 (P = .002) levels; HGNA treatment significantly increased acetylated H3K14 (P = .042) and H4K12 (P = .029) levels. The protein levels of acetylated H3K14 and H4K12 in propofol + SAHA, propofol + SEN or propofol + HGNA group were not significantly different from those in control + NS group (P > .05) 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License | 2607 LIN ET AL. F I G U R E 6 Maternal propofol exposure increased the level of HDAC2 and the reversed effect of SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment. HDAC2 protein level was determined by immunofluorescence (mean (cid:1) SD). Maternal exposure to propofol up-regulated the expression of HDAC2 protein in offspring compared to the control condition (P = .001). SAHA treatment significantly inhibited the expression of HDAC2 protein (P = .029); SEN treatment significantly decreased HDAC2 protein level (P = .032); HGNA treatment significantly decreased HDAC2 protein level (P = .006). The protein levels of acetylated HDAC2 in propofol+SAHA, propofol + SEN or propofol + HGNA group were not significantly different from those in control + NS group (P > .05) F I G U R E 7 Maternal propofol exposure decreased the level of phospho-CREB and the reversed effect of SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment. Phospho-CREB protein level was determined by immunofluorescence (mean (cid:1) SD). Maternal exposure to propofol decreased the expression of phospho-CREB protein in offspring compared to the control condition (P < .001). SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment significantly increased phospho-CREB protein level (P = .006, P = .006, P = .016, respectively). The protein levels of phospho-CREB in propofol + SAHA, propofol + SEN or propofol + HGNA group were not significantly different from those in control + NS group (P > .05) 4 | D I S C U S S I O N H3K14 and H4K12 and the phosphorylation of CREB, down-regu- lates the expression of NR2B, up-regulates the expression of HGN The current study findings suggest that pregnant rats propofol and decreases the ration of NR2B/HGN and the expression of anaesthesia on E7 impairs the learning and memory in offspring rats, synaptophysin. SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide increases the expression of HDAC2, inhibits the acetylation of ameliorate all these changes. 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License 2608 | LIN ET AL. F I G U R E 8 Maternal propofol exposure broken the balance between NR2B and HGN and the mitigating effect of SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment. Expression of NR2B and HGN protein was detected by Western blot (mean (cid:1) SD). A, Maternal exposure to propofol decreased the NR2B protein level (P < .001). B, Maternal exposure to propofol increased the HGN protein level (P < .001). C, The ratio of NR2B/HGN was significantly reduced in offspring compared with the control condition (P < .001). SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment significantly increased NR2B protein level and decreased HGN protein level and reversed the ratio of NR2B/HGN (P < .05). The protein levels of NR2B and HGN and the ratio of NR2B/ HGN in propofol + SAHA, propofol + SEN or propofol + HGNA group were not significantly different from those in control + NS group (P > .05) Maternal body temperature, respiratory rate, saturation of pulse the 2nd trimester of pregnancy) may cause learning deficits in the rat offspring.42 Our previous study showed that ketamine, propofol oximetry, heart rate and non-invasive blood pressure were continu- ously monitored during propofol exposure, and no obvious abnor- and enflurane anaesthesia during early gestation (on gestation day 7) induced learning and memory impairment in offspring rats,11-14 asso- mality was observed. Furthermore, maternal artery blood gases were analysed after the 4 hours propofol infusion and showed no signifi- ciated with hippocampal neuron injury, NR2B receptor subunit cant change (Table 1). Moreover, there was no significant difference reduction and increased level of HGN mRNA. in birth rate, offspring survival rate, the ratio of sex or basic physical How does propofol anaesthesia during pregnancy impair the development of offspring between propofol and saline group. These results suggested that the impaired learning and memory of the rats’ learning and memory in offspring? The consolidation and mainte- nance of memory require specific genes expression, and histone acetylation promotes the expression of these genes, while histone deacetylation represses their expression.21,43 Histone deacetylases offspring may be not caused by pathological disorders but caused by the pregnant rats propofol anaesthesia in the current study. Several animal studies showed that anaesthetics exposure during gestation induced apoptosis in foetal brain.1,2,40 Xiong et al and our (HDACs) inhibit the expression of these genes, while histone acetyl- transferases (HATs) promote their expression.44 Among the HDACs, HDAC2 was implicated in learning and memory, it negatively regu- previous study showed that prenatal propofol exposure resulted in learning and memory deficit in offspring.4,5 While these studies lates synaptic plasticity and memory process by suppressing memory specific genes’ expression, and loss function of HDAC2 facilitates synaptic plasticity and learning and memory.32 Graff et al showed mainly focused on the second and third trimester, there is little information in relation to the effect of propofol anaesthesia during early pregnancy on the cognitive function in offspring. Because some that HDAC2 overexpression reduced the histone acetylation of his- tone and inhibited the expression of memory specific genes. HDAC2 of non-obstetric surgeries during pregnancy occurred in the first tri- mester,10 our current study mainly focus on gestation day 7, which distinct with the exposure time-point in previous studies,4-6 the dif- is significantly enriched near the histones of genes shown to play a key role in learning, memory and synaptic plasticity, such as H2B lysine (K) 5, H3K14, H4K5, and H4K12. Reversing the build- up of ferent exposure time-point may alter the vulnerability to general anaesthetics for the developing brain. Halothane and enflurane HDAC2 by short-hairpin-RNA -mediated knockdown activated these exposure on gestation day 6 and 10 (amount to the early and early genes, reinstated structural and synaptic plasticity and abolished the 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License | 2609 LIN ET AL. synaptic plasticity and long-term potential (LTP). Not only the activa- tion of positive regulatory mechanisms that favour memory storage but also the removal of inhibitory constraints that prevent memory storage are required for long-lasting of synaptic plasticity.37 Negative regulators play an important role in the formation and maintenance of memory. Hippyragranin (HGN) is a protein which expresses in rat hippocampus and involves in negative memory regulation.18 Down- regulation of HGN by antisense oligonucleotide in the hippocampal CA1 region caused enhanced learning and memory as well as ele- vated LTP. Therefore, we hypothesize that the balance between the positive regulator NR2B and negative regulator HGN plays a pivotal role in the learning and memory process. Present study showed that Senegenin treatment reversed the protein levels of NR2B, HGN and the ratio of NR2B/HGN, as well as enhanced learning and memory, which in accordance with the previous research that Senegenin attenuates cognitive impairment by up-regulating expression of hip- pocampal NR2B expression in rats.28 While treatment with HGN antisense oligonucleotide inhibited the expression of HGN protein, reversed the ratio of NR2B/HGN and the learning and memory impairment as previous report.18 Transcription factor CREB (cAMP response element-binding pro- tein) shows an important role in synaptic plasticity underlying learn- ing memory.48,49 CREB is a critical mediator of cAMP- and calcium- F I G U R E 9 Maternal propofol exposure decreased the expression of synaptophysin and the reversed effect of SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment. Synaptophysin level was determined by Western blot (mean (cid:1) SD). Maternal exposure to propofol decreased the expression of synaptophysin in offspring compared to the control condition (P = .002). SAHA, SEN and HGNA treatment significantly increased synaptophysin protein level (P = .026, P = .007, P = .027, respectively). The protein levels of synaptophysin in propofol + SAHA, propofol + SEN or propofol + HGNA group were not significantly different from those in control + NS group (P > .05) inducible transcription, whereas the phosphorylation of serine 133 is its main in its kinase-inducible domain (KID) (phospho-Ser133) transactivating form. Phospho-Ser133 plays a role in CREB to bind the KIX domain of the coactivators CBP and p300 (CBP/p300).50 Vecsey et al25 demonstrated that enhancement of hippocampus- dependent memory and synaptic plasticity by HDAC inhibitors was relied on the binding of CREB and CREB-binding protein (CBP), which induced robust activation of gene transcription afterwards. The activity of CREB is essential to the gene transcription of NR2B, neurodegeneration-associated memory impairments. Abolished the memory impairments in connection with neurodegeneration.35 Our and expression of NR2B relies on the binding of p-CREB to its bind- ing site at the promoter of the NR2B gene.51 Fujita et al27 have demonstrated that HDAC inhibitor up-regulated the expression of isoflurane anaesthesia during earlier study suggested that maternal acetylated histones and NR2B mRNA in the hippocampus, and up- third trimester impairs the spatial learning and memory of the off- spring rats, and its mechanism in connection with the up-regulation regulated expression of acetylated histones was accompanied by enhanced binding of p-CREB to its binding site at the promoter of the NR2B gene.27 These findings indicated that HDAC inhibitor pro- of HDAC2 mRNA and subsequent inhibits the expression of CREB mRNA and NR2B, while HDAC2 inhibition reversed these changes.30 motes learning and memory by increasing the acetylation of histone Consistent to our previous study, our results suggest that maternal propofol anaesthesia on E7 impairs learning and memory in offspring and the phosphorylation of CREB, and subsequent increase of NR2B rats, causes the overexpression of HDAC2 and inhibits the acetyla- expression. Our previous study has demonstrated that isoflurane tion of H3K14 and H4K12, and these effects were reversed by anaesthesia during the third trimester impaired learning and memory in offspring rats via “HDAC2-CREB-NR2B” pathway.30 SAHA. Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide treatment also showed similar effects. Synaptophysin is a synaptic protein marker and provides a struc- tural basis for synaptic plasticity.52 Decrease in synaptophysin is implicated in learning and memory impairment.1,4,5 Graff et al35 NMDA receptors play a crucial role in neuronal development and circuit formation. Subunit NR2B is critical to learning and memory.45 It is reported that the enhancement of pre-frontal cortical long-term demonstrated that HDAC2 overexpression reduced synaptophysin potentiation (LTP) and working memory via the up-regulate expres- sion of NR2B specifically in the forebrain region.46 While decreased protein level and caused memory impairments, HDAC2 inhibition reversed the effects. As synaptophysin is one of the CREB target genes,53 we detected the expression of synaptophysin in the present expression of NR2B subunit suppressed NMDA-dependent long- learning.47 Therefore, term potentiation (LTP) and impaired spatial study. The results showed that propofol anaesthesia during preg- nancy reduced the protein level of synaptophysin in offspring’s NR2B acts as a positive regulator in memory process by promoting 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License 2610 | LIN ET AL. C O N F L I C T O F I N T E R E S T S hippocampus, whereas SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide mitigated the reduced synaptophysin levels; mean- The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. while, the increased expression of synaptophysin was companied with decreased HDAC2 protein level, increased histone acetylation A U T H O R C O N T R I B U T I O N S and CREB phosphorylation level. The BDNF-TrkB signalling pathway is one of the downstream regulating targets of histone acetylation, F.Q.L. and J.M.L. conceived and designed the experiments. J.M.L., so BDNF-TrkB signalling pathway may be one of the underlying Y.L.F. and S.Q.W. performed the experiments. J.M.L and F.Q.L. anal- downstream mechanisms of learning and memory deficits induced by ysed the data. J.M.L. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. propofol exposure during early gestation. It is confirmed that J.M.L and F.Q.L. wrote the article. All the authors read and approved HDAC2 up-regulation will impair BDNF-TrkB signalling pathway and results in cognitive impairments induced by isoflurane.54 Our previ- the final manuscript. ous study also verified the role of BDNF-TrkB signalling pathway in O R C I D the cognitive deficits induced by propofol during late pregnant stage.5 Whether BDNF-TrkB signalling pathway involves in the Foquan Luo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-0710 learning and memory impairments induced by maternal propofol anaesthesia needs to be explored in future study. Present study has several limitations. First, we had not accessed R E F E R E N C E S the pathological changes of neurons in the foetal brains immediately 1. Zheng H, Dong Y, Xu Z, et al. Sevoflurane anesthesia in pregnant mice induces neurotoxicity in fetal and offspring mice. Anesthesiol- ogy. 2013;118:516-526. after maternal propofol exposure and during various period of brain in the present development (e.g., post-natal day 1 to 10). Second, study, we only used MWM to evaluate learning and memory. 2. Zhao T, Li Y, Wei W, et al. Ketamine administered to pregnant rats in the second trimester causes long-lasting behavioral disorders in offspring. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;68:145-155. Although MWM is recognized as an appropriate way to evaluate the spatial learning and memory in rodents, to provide a more compre- 3. Palanisamy A, Baxter MG, Keel PK, et al. Rats exposed to isoflurane in utero during early gestation are behaviorally abnormal as adults. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:521-528. hensive assessment of learning and memory in rat offspring, multiple behavioural test such as open field test, step-through test and the fear conditioning test should be used in future study. Third, we have 4. Xiong M, Li J, Alhashem HM, et al. Propofol exposure in pregnant rats induces neurotoxicity and persistent learning deficit in the off- spring. Brain Sci. 2014;4:356-375. explored the underlying mechanisms only from hippocampus. Mater- nal propofol exposure may also affect other brain regions, such as cortex, thalamus and hypothalamus regions. Li et al55 found that 5. Liang Z, Luo F, Zhao W, et al. Propofol exposure during late stages of pregnancy impairs learning and memory in rat offspring via J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20:1920-1931. the BDNF-TrkB signalling pathway. propofol anaesthesia in pregnant rats induced caspase-3 activation and microglial response in foetal rats. They found that the activated 6. Creeley C, Dikranian K, Dissen G, et al. Propofol-induced apoptosis of neurones and oligodendrocytes in fetal and neonatal rhesus maca- que brain. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:i29-i38. caspase-3-positive cells were abundant and heavily concentrated in the cortex, thalamus and hypothalamus regions.55 Whether maternal propofol anaesthesia will affect the histone acetylation in other brain 7. Clancy B, Darlington RB, Finlay BL. Translating developmental time regions should be studied. We had only evaluated the short-term across mammalian species. Neuroscience. 2001;105:7-17. 8. Goodman S. Anesthesia for nonobstetric surgery in the pregnant therapeutic effects of SAHA, Senegenin and HGNA on behaviour patient. Semin perinatal. 2002;26:136-145. performance and proteins. The long-term or long-lasting therapeutic 9. F€orster S, Reimer T, Rimbach S, et al. CAMIC recommendations for laparoscopy in non-obstetric indications during pregnancy. surgical Zentralbl Chir. 2016;141:538-544. effects of these drugs on learning and memory deficits and protein expression changes caused by propofol exposure on E7 should be 10. Fardiazar Z, Derakhshan I, Torab R, et al. Maternal-neonatal out- come in pregnancies with non-obstetric laparotomy during preg- nancy. Pak J Biol Sci. 2014;17:260-265. evaluated in future study. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that propofol anaesthesia during first trimester causes learning and mem- 11. Qin Z, Foquan L, Weilu Z, et al. Effect of prolonged anesthesia with propofol during early pregnancy on cognitive function of offspring rats. Chin J Anesthesiol. 2014;34:1051-1053. ory deficit in offspring rats by inhibiting histone acetylation. SAHA, Senegenin and HGN antisense oligonucleotide can ameliorate these 12. Fo-quan L, Jun-wu L, Shu-xin T, et al. Effect of inhalation of enflu- rane in early pregnancy on the expression of NR2B in the hip- pocampus of offspring of rats. Chin J Anesthesiol. 2011;31:1076- 1078. impairments. A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S 13. Li Gang Z, Wei-lu L. Fo-quan. Effect of ketamine anesthesia in early pregnancy on the c-fos mRNA and c-jun mRNA expression in off- spring of rats. Chin J Anesthesiol. 2010;30:1333-1335. We thank other members of the laboratory for valuable discussion and technical help. This research was supported by National Natural 14. Bing-da L, Fuo-quan L, Wei-lu Z, et al. Effect of ketamine anesthesia in early pregnancy on expression of hippyragranin mRNA in hip- pocampus in offspring of rats. Chin J Anesthesiol. 2012;32:1334- 1336. Science Foundation of China (NO. 81460175, 81060093) and Natu- Jiangxi Province of China ral Science Foundation of (NO. 20171ACB20030, 20132BAB205022). 15824934, 2018, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcmm.13524 by Johns Hopkins University, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License | 2611 LIN ET AL. 36. Mizuno M, Yamada K, Maekawa N, Saito K. CREB phosphorylation as a molecular marker of memory processing in the hippocampus for spatial learning. Behav Brain Res. 2002;133:135-141. 15. Barria A, Malinow R. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptic plasticity by regulating binding to CaMKII. Neuron. 2005;48:289-301. 16. Williams JM, Gu(cid:2)evremont D, Kennard JT, et al. Long-term regulation of n-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunits and associated synaptic proteins following hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neuroscience. 2003;118:1003-1013. 37. Abel T, Martin KC, Bartsch D, Kandel ER. Memory suppressor genes: inhibitory constraints on the storage of long-term memory. Science. 1998;279:338-341. 38. Bliss TV. Young receptors make smart mice. Nature. 1999;401:25- 17. Miwa H, Fukaya M, Watabe AM, et al. Functional contributions of synaptically localized NR2B subunits of the NMDA receptor to synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation in the adult mouse CNS. J Physiol. 2008;586:2539-2550. 27. 39. Voigt T, De Lima A, Beckmann M. Synaptophysin immunohistochem- istry reveals inside-out pattern of early synaptogenesis in ferret cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1993;330:48-64. 40. Kong F, Xu L, He D, et al. Effects of gestational isoflurane exposure J Pharmacol. on postnatal memory and learning in rats. Eur 2011;670:168-174. 18. Zhang XH, Zhang H, Tu Y, et al. Identification of a novel protein for memory regulation in the hippocampus. Biochem Biophys Res Com- mun. 2005;334:418-424. 41. Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, et al. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 1991;30:572-580. 19. Sutton MA, Schuman EM. Dendritic protein synthesis, synaptic plas- ticity, and memory. Cell. 2006;127:49-58. 20. Goldberg AD, Allis CD, Bernstein E. Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell. 2007;128:635-638. 42. Chalon J, Tang CK, Ramanathan S, et al. Exposure to halothane and enflurane affects learning function of murine progeny. Anesth Analg. 1981;60:794-797. 21. Penney J, Tsai LH. Histone deacetylases in memory and cognition. Sci Signal. 2014;7:re12. 22. Singh P, Thakur MK. Reduced recognition memory is correlated with decrease in DNA methyltransferase1 and increase in histone deacetylase2 protein expression in old male mice. Biogerontology. 2014;15:339-346. 43. Kandel ER. The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science. 2001;294:1030-1038. 44. Graff J, Tsai LH. Histone acetylation: molecular mnemonics on the chromatin. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:97-111. 23. Agudelo M, Gandhi N, Saiyed Z, et al. Effects of alcohol on histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and the neuroprotective role of trichostatin A (TSA). Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35:1550-1556. 45. Sepulveda FJ, Bustos FJ, Inostroza E, et al. Montecino M, van Zun- dert B. Differential roles of NMDA Receptor Subtypes NR2A and NR2B in dendritic branch development and requirement of RasGRF1. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:1758-1770. 24. Wagner FF, Zhang YL, Fass DM, et al. Kinetically Selective Inhibitors of Histone Deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) as Cognition Enhancers. Chem Sci. 2015;6:804-815. 46. Cui Y, Jin J, Zhang X, et al. Forebrain NR2B overexpression facilitat- ing the prefrontal cortex long-term potentiation and enhancing working memory function in mice. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20312. 25. Vecsey CG, Hawk JD, Lattal KM, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibi- tors enhance memory and synaptic plasticity via CREB: CBP-depen- dent transcriptional activation. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6128-6140. 26. Fass DM, Reis SA, Ghosh B, et al. Crebinostat: a novel cognitive enhan- cer that inhibits histone deacetylase activity and modulates chromatin- mediated neuroplasticity. Neuropharmacology. 2013;64:81-96. 47. Clayton DA, Mesches MH, Alvarez E, et al. A hippocampal NR2B defi- cit can mimic age-related changes in long-term potentiation and spa- tial learning in the Fischer 344 rat. J Neurosci. 2002;22:3628-3637. 48. Sakamoto K, Karelina K, Obrietan K. CREB: a multifaceted regulator of neuronal plasticity and protection. J Neurochem. 2011;116:1-9. 49. Kida S. A functional role for CREB as a positive regulator of memory formation and LTP. Exp Neurobiol. 2012;21:136-140. 27. Fujita Y, Morinobu S, Takei S, et al. Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, facilitates fear extinction and enhances expression of the hippocampal NR2B-containing NMDA receptor gene. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46:635-643. 50. Xu W, Kasper LH, Lerach S, et al. Individual CREB-target genes dic- tate usage of distinct cAMP-responsive coactivation mechanisms. EMBO J. 2007;26:2890-2903. 28. Xie W, Yang Y, Gu X, et al. Senegenin attenuates hepatic ischemia- reperfusion induced cognitive dysfunction by increasing hippocampal NR2B expression in rats. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45575. 51. Rani CS, Qiang M, Ticku MK. Potential role of cAMP response ele- ment-binding protein in ethanol-induced N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 2B subunit gene transcription in fetal mouse cortical cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67:2126-2136. 29. Hou Q, Gao X, Zhang X, et al. SNAP-25 in hippocampal CA1 region is involved in memory consolidation. Eur J Neuorsci. 2004;20:1593- 1603. 52. Sheng M, Kim MJ. Postsynaptic signaling and plasticity mechanisms. 30. Luo F, Hu Y, Zhao W, et al. Maternal Exposure of Rats to Isoflurane during Late Pregnancy Impairs Spatial Learning and Memory in the Offspring by Up-Regulating the Expression of Histone Deacetylase 2. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0160826. Science. 2002;298:776-780. 53. Lonze BE, Ginty DD. Function and regulation of CREB family tran- scription factors in the nervous system. Neuron. 2002;35:605-623. 54. Ji M1, Dong L, Jia M, et al. Epigenetic enhancement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling pathway improves cognitive impair- ments induced by isoflurane exposure in aged rats. Mol Neurobiol 2014;50:937-944. 31. Peleg S, Sananbenesi F, Zovoilis A, et al. Altered histone acetylation in mice. is associated with age-dependent memory impairment Science. 2010;328:753-756. 32. Guan JS, Haggarty SJ, Giacometti E, et al. HDAC2 negatively regu- plasticity. Nature. formation synaptic and lates memory 2009;459:55-60. 55. Li J, Xiong M, Nadavaluru PR, et al. Dexmedetomidine attenuates neurotoxicity induced by prenatal propofol exposure. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2016;28:51-64. 33. Berndsen CE, Denu JM. Catalysis and substrate selection by his- Struct Biol. acetyltransferases. Curr Opin tone/protein lysine 2008;18:682-689. How to cite this article: Lin J, Wang S, Feng Y, et al. Propofol exposure during early gestation impairs learning and 34. Haberland M, Montgomery RL, Olson EN. The many roles of histone deacetylases in development and physiology: implications for disease and therapy. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:32-42. memory in rat offspring by inhibiting the acetylation of histone. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:2600–2611. 35. Gr€aff J, Rei D, Guan JS, et al. An epigenetic blockade of cognitive functions in the neurodegenerating brain. Nature. 2012;483:222- 226. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13524 |