chill.py

import argparse
import json
import time
from utils import calculate_overall_score, query_ai_prompt
from promptObjects import (
    improve_prompt,
    critique_prompt,
    faith_scorer_prompt,
    spicy_scorer_prompt,
    ImprovedText,
    Critique,
    FaithfulnessScore,
    SpicyScore,
)

# This script uses the llama_cpp server to improve a text, it depends on the llama_cpp server being installed and running with a model loaded.
# pip install llama-cpp-python[server] --upgrade
# python3 -m llama_cpp.server --model mixtral-8x7b-instruct-v0.1.Q4_K_M.gguf  --port 5834 --n_ctx 4096 --use_mlock false
# Run this script:
# python3 chill.py
# This should then try and improve the original text below.
# Or you could import the improvement_loop function with a string as an argument to improve a specific text,
# or use it as a command line tool with the -t flag to improve a specific text.

original_text = """Stop chasing dreams instead. Life is not a Hollywood movie. Not everyone is going to get a famous billionaire. Adjust your expectations to reality, and stop thinking so highly of yourself, stop judging others. Assume the responsibility for the things that happen in your life. It is kind of annoying to read your text, it is always some external thing that "happened" to you, and it is always other people who are not up to your standards. At some moment you even declare with despair. And guess what? This is true and false at the same time, in a fundamental level most people are not remarkable, and you probably aren't too. But at the same time, nobody is the same, you have worth just by being, and other people have too. The impression I get is that you must be someone incredibly annoying to work with, and that your performance is not even nearly close to what you think it is, and that you really need to come down to earth. Stop looking outside, work on yourself instead. You'll never be satisfied just by changing jobs. Do therapy if you wish, become acquainted with stoicism, be a volunteer in some poor country, whatever, but do something to regain control of your life, to get some perspective, and to adjust your expectations to reality."""
# From elzbardico on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36119858

"""
Outputs something like this:
 {
    "critique": "The revised text effectively conveys the same message as the original but in a more constructive and diplomatic tone, maintaining the original's intention while promoting a more positive discussion.",
    "faithfulness_score": 0.85,
    "spicy_score": 0.25,
    "overall_score": 0.89,
    "edit": "Consider shifting your focus from chasing dreams to finding fulfillment in reality. Life isn't a Hollywood movie, and becoming a famous billionaire isn't a realistic goal for everyone. It might be helpful to recalibrate your expectations to better align with what's possible. Instead of judging others, try to understand them better. Take responsibility for the events in your life, rather than attributing them to external factors or other people. I understand that it can be frustrating when things don't go as planned, but keep in mind that most people, including yourself, are not inherently exceptional or unremarkable. However, everyone has unique worth that doesn't depend on their achievements or status. It's essential to recognize that you may come across as demanding to work with and that your self-perception might not match others' opinions of your performance. To gain a fresh perspective and adjust your expectations, you could explore personal growth opportunities such as therapy, practicing stoicism, volunteering in underserved communities, or any other activity that helps you develop self-awareness and emotional intelligence."
}
"""

global suggestions
suggestions = []
last_edit = ""
start_time = time.time()
max_iterations = 20


def improve_text_attempt():
    global suggestions
    replacements = {
        "original_text": json.dumps(original_text),
        "previous_suggestions": json.dumps(suggestions, indent=2),
    }
    resp_json = query_ai_prompt(improve_prompt, replacements, ImprovedText)
    return resp_json["text"]


def critique_text(last_edit):
    replacements = {"original_text": original_text, "last_edit": last_edit}

    # Query the AI for each of the new prompts separately

    critique_resp = query_ai_prompt(critique_prompt, replacements, Critique)
    faithfulness_resp = query_ai_prompt(
        faith_scorer_prompt, replacements, FaithfulnessScore
    )
    spiciness_resp = query_ai_prompt(spicy_scorer_prompt, replacements, SpicyScore)

    # Combine the results from the three queries into a single dictionary
    combined_resp = {
        "critique": critique_resp["critique"],
        "faithfulness_score": faithfulness_resp["faithfulness_score"],
        "spicy_score": spiciness_resp["spicy_score"],
    }

    return combined_resp


def should_stop(
    iteration,
    overall_score,
    time_used,
    min_iterations=2,
    min_overall_score=0.85,
    max_seconds=60,
):
    good_attempt = iteration >= min_iterations and overall_score >= min_overall_score
    too_long = time_used > max_seconds and overall_score >= 0.7
    return good_attempt or too_long


def update_suggestions(critique_dict):
    global suggestions
    critique_dict["overall_score"] = round(
        calculate_overall_score(
            critique_dict["faithfulness_score"], critique_dict["spicy_score"]
        ),
        2,
    )
    critique_dict["edit"] = last_edit
    suggestions.append(critique_dict)
    suggestions = sorted(suggestions, key=lambda x: x["overall_score"], reverse=True)[
        :2
    ]


def print_iteration_result(iteration, overall_score, time_used):
    global suggestions
    print(
        f"Iteration {iteration}: overall_score={overall_score:.2f}, time_used={time_used:.2f} seconds."
    )
    print("suggestions:")
    print(json.dumps(suggestions, indent=2))


def improvement_loop(input_text):
    global original_text
    global last_edit
    global suggestions
    global start_time
    global max_iterations
    suggestions = []
    last_edit = ""
    start_time = time.time()
    max_iterations = 20
    original_text = input_text

    for iteration in range(1, max_iterations + 1):
        try:
            if iteration % 2 == 1:
                last_edit = improve_text_attempt()
            else:
                critique_dict = critique_text(last_edit)
                update_suggestions(critique_dict)
                overall_score = critique_dict["overall_score"]
                time_used = time.time() - start_time

                print_iteration_result(iteration, overall_score, time_used)

                if should_stop(iteration, overall_score, time_used):
                    print(
                        "Stopping\nTop suggestion:\n",
                        json.dumps(suggestions[0], indent=4),
                    )
                    break
        except ValueError as e:
            print("ValueError:", e)
            continue

    return suggestions[0]


if __name__ == "__main__":
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Process and improve text.")
    parser.add_argument("-t", "--text", type=str, help="Text to be improved", default=original_text)
    args = parser.parse_args()

    improvement_loop(args.text)


# TODO: Segment the text into sentences for parallel processing, and isolate the most problematic parts for improvement
"""
# import pysbd
# sentences = pysbd.Segmenter(language="en", clean=False).segment(paragraph)
"""