Spaces:
Paused
Paused
File size: 32,427 Bytes
73c1565 d284357 73c1565 07826f1 ceb42dc 73c1565 342b036 73c1565 342b036 73c1565 342b036 73c1565 342b036 73c1565 342b036 73c1565 342b036 73c1565 6dfbea3 73c1565 ceb42dc 73c1565 63448f7 73c1565 d284357 73c1565 5fb9b56 73c1565 b5a6c06 c12b0ec 73c1565 4677b12 73c1565 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 |
# Demo for T5 trained on multi-angular AAAC
import textwrap
import re
import streamlit as st
from spacy import displacy
import graphviz
import seaborn as sns
import aaac_util as aaac
from huggingface_hub.inference_api import InferenceApi
INTRO_TEXT = """This app let's you explore ArgumentAnalyst, a system for
logical analysis and reconstruction of argumentative texts (DeepA2).
See also [Betz / Richardson 2021](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01509)."""
BOILER_PLATE = {
"Enter your story" : "",
"Enter question (optional)": "",
}
MODES = [
# informal analysis
{'id':'s => a','from':['argument_source'],'to':'argdown_reconstruction'},
{'id':'s+r => a','from':['argument_source','reason_statements'],'to':'argdown_reconstruction'},
{'id':'s+j => a','from':['argument_source','conclusion_statements'],'to':'argdown_reconstruction'},
{'id':'r+j => a','from':['reason_statements','conclusion_statements'],'to':'argdown_reconstruction'},
{'id':'s+r+j => a','from':['argument_source','reason_statements','conclusion_statements'],'to':'argdown_reconstruction'},
{'id':'s => r','from':['argument_source'],'to':'reason_statements'},
{'id':'s+a => r','from':['argument_source','argdown_reconstruction'],'to':'reason_statements'},
{'id':'s+j => r','from':['argument_source','conclusion_statements'],'to':'reason_statements'},
{'id':'s => j','from':['argument_source'],'to':'conclusion_statements'},
{'id':'s+a => j','from':['argument_source','argdown_reconstruction'],'to':'conclusion_statements'},
{'id':'s+r => j','from':['argument_source','reason_statements'],'to':'conclusion_statements'},
# extract premises and conclusions
{'id':'a => c','from':['argdown_reconstruction'],'to':'conclusion'},
{'id':'a => p','from':['argdown_reconstruction'],'to':'premises'},
# formalize
{'id':'p => f','from':['premises'],'to':'premises_formalized'},
{'id':'p+c+o => f','from':['premises','conclusion','conclusion_formalized'],'to':'premises_formalized'},
{'id':'c => o','from':['conclusion'],'to':'conclusion_formalized'},
{'id':'c+p+f => o','from':['conclusion','premises','premises_formalized'],'to':'conclusion_formalized'},
{'id':'p+f => k','from':['premises','premises_formalized'],'to':'plcd_subs'},
{'id':'c+o => k','from':['conclusion','conclusion_formalized'],'to':'plcd_subs'},
{'id':'p+f+c+o => k','from':['premises','premises_formalized','conclusion','conclusion_formalized'],'to':'plcd_subs'},
# re-reconstruct argument
{'id':'f+k => p','from':['premises_formalized','plcd_subs'],'to':'premises'},
{'id':'o+k => c','from':['conclusion_formalized','plcd_subs'],'to':'conclusion'},
{'id':'p+c => a','from':['premises','conclusion'],'to':'argdown_reconstruction'}
]
TEST_DATA = [
{"title":"Allergies (AAAC, 2 steps, 2 distractors, 1 implicit premise, 1 implicit intermediary conclusion)","argument_source":"Whoever is a sufferer of allergy to mango is not a sufferer of allergy to sesame or a sufferer of allergy to carrot. And no sufferer of allergy to carrot is hypersensitive to mango. Consequently, every sufferer of allergy to mango reacts allergically to turkey. Yet someone who is not a sufferer of allergy to mango and a sufferer of allergy to cheese is a sufferer of allergy to ginger and a sufferer of allergy to pepper. Plus, every person who is not both a sufferer of allergy to maize and a sufferer of allergy to mustard is a sufferer of allergy to cinnamon or a sufferer of allergy to oat.","argdown_reconstruction":"(1) If someone is a sufferer of allergy to mango, then they are a sufferer of allergy to carrot, or not a sufferer of allergy to sesame.\n(2) If someone is a sufferer of allergy to carrot, then they are not a sufferer of allergy to mango.\n--\nwith generalized disjunctive syllogism (transposition, negation variant) from (1), (2)\n--\n(3) If someone is a sufferer of allergy to mango, then they are not a sufferer of allergy to sesame.\n(4) If someone is a sufferer of allergy to mango, then they are a sufferer of allergy to sesame or a sufferer of allergy to turkey.\n--\nwith generalized disjunctive syllogism from (3), (4)\n--\n(5) If someone is a sufferer of allergy to mango, then they are a sufferer of allergy to turkey.","reason_statements":[{"text":"Whoever is a sufferer of allergy to mango is not a sufferer of allergy to sesame or a sufferer of allergy to carrot","starts_at":0,"ref_reco":1},{"text":"no sufferer of allergy to carrot is hypersensitive to mango","starts_at":121,"ref_reco":2}],"conclusion_statements":[{"text":"every sufferer of allergy to mango reacts allergically to turkey","starts_at":196,"ref_reco":5}],"premises":[{"ref_reco":1,"text":"If someone is a sufferer of allergy to mango, then they are a sufferer of allergy to carrot, or not a sufferer of allergy to sesame.","explicit":"true"},{"ref_reco":2,"text":"If someone is a sufferer of allergy to carrot, then they are not a sufferer of allergy to mango.","explicit":"true"},{"ref_reco":4,"text":"If someone is a sufferer of allergy to mango, then they are a sufferer of allergy to sesame or a sufferer of allergy to turkey.","explicit":"false"}],"premises_formalized":[{"form":"(x): ${F1}x -> (${F4}x v \u00ac${F2}x)","ref_reco":1},{"form":"(x): ${F4}x -> \u00ac${F1}x","ref_reco":2},{"form":"(x): ${F1}x -> (${F2}x v ${F3}x)","ref_reco":4}],"conclusion":[{"ref_reco":5,"text":"If someone is a sufferer of allergy to mango, then they are a sufferer of allergy to turkey."}],"conclusion_formalized":[{"form":"(x): ${F1}x -> ${F3}x","ref_reco":5}],"intermediary_conclusions_formalized":[{"form":"(x): ${F1}x -> \u00ac${F2}x","ref_reco":3}],"intermediary_conclusions":[{"ref_reco":3,"text":"If someone is a sufferer of allergy to mango, then they are not a sufferer of allergy to sesame."}],"distractors":["Every person who is not both a sufferer of allergy to maize and a sufferer of allergy to mustard is a sufferer of allergy to cinnamon or a sufferer of allergy to oat.","Someone who is not a sufferer of allergy to mango and a sufferer of allergy to cheese is a sufferer of allergy to ginger and a sufferer of allergy to pepper."],"id":"8c2c3329-cab8-4bd1-b4e7-3ff26506be9d","predicate_placeholders":["F1","F2","F3","F4"],"entity_placeholders":[],"steps":2,"n_premises":3,"n_distractors":2,"base_scheme_groups":["generalized disjunctive syllogism"],"scheme_variants":["transposition","negation variant"],"domain_id":"allergies","domain_type":"persons","plcd_subs":{"F1":"sufferer of allergy to mango","F2":"sufferer of allergy to sesame","F3":"sufferer of allergy to turkey","F4":"sufferer of allergy to carrot"},"argdown_index_map":{"s0c":5,"s0p0":4,"s1c":3,"s1p1":2,"s2c":2,"s2p0":1,"s1p0":1},"presentation_parameters":{"resolve_steps":[1],"direction":"forward","implicit_conclusion":"false","implicit_premise":"true","redundancy_frequency":0.1,"drop_conj_frequency":0.1,"start_sentence":[0,2]}},
{"title":"Families (AAAC, 3 steps, 0 distractors, 1 implicit premise)","argument_source":"A person who is not a nephew of Richard is a half-brother of Lance or a son of Jeff, and vice versa. Hence, somebody who is not a nephew of Richard is a half-brother of Lance or a son of Jeff. We may conclude that nobody is neither a nephew of Richard nor a son of Jeff. All this entails that a person who is not a great-grandfather of David is a son of Jeff, owing to the fact that someone who is not a great-grandfather of David is not a nephew of Richard.","argdown_reconstruction":"(1) If, and only if, someone is not a nephew of Richard, then they are a half-brother of Lance or a son of Jeff.\n--\nwith generalized biconditional elimination (negation variant, complex variant) from (1)\n--\n(2) If someone is not a nephew of Richard, then they are a half-brother of Lance or a son of Jeff.\n(3) If someone is a half-brother of Lance, then they are a nephew of Richard.\n--\nwith generalized disjunctive syllogism (transposition, negation variant) from (2), (3)\n--\n(4) If someone is not a nephew of Richard, then they are a son of Jeff.\n(5) If someone is not a great-grandfather of David, then they are not a nephew of Richard.\n--\nwith hypothetical syllogism (negation variant) from (4), (5)\n--\n(6) If someone is not a great-grandfather of David, then they are a son of Jeff.","reason_statements":[{"text":"A person who is not a nephew of Richard is a half-brother of Lance or a son of Jeff, and vice versa","starts_at":0,"ref_reco":1},{"text":"someone who is not a great-grandfather of David is not a nephew of Richard","starts_at":383,"ref_reco":5}],"conclusion_statements":[{"text":"somebody who is not a nephew of Richard is a half-brother of Lance or a son of Jeff","starts_at":108,"ref_reco":2},{"text":"nobody is neither a nephew of Richard nor a son of Jeff","starts_at":214,"ref_reco":4},{"text":"a person who is not a great-grandfather of David is a son of Jeff","starts_at":293,"ref_reco":6}],"premises":[{"ref_reco":1,"text":"If, and only if, someone is not a nephew of Richard, then they are a half-brother of Lance or a son of Jeff.","explicit":"true"},{"ref_reco":3,"text":"If someone is a half-brother of Lance, then they are a nephew of Richard.","explicit":"false"},{"ref_reco":5,"text":"If someone is not a great-grandfather of David, then they are not a nephew of Richard.","explicit":"true"}],"premises_formalized":[{"form":"(x): \u00ac${F2}x <-> (${F4}x v ${F3}x)","ref_reco":1},{"form":"(x): ${F4}x -> ${F2}x","ref_reco":3},{"form":"(x): \u00ac${F1}x -> \u00ac${F2}x","ref_reco":5}],"conclusion":[{"ref_reco":6,"text":"If someone is not a great-grandfather of David, then they are a son of Jeff."}],"conclusion_formalized":[{"form":"(x): \u00ac${F1}x -> ${F3}x","ref_reco":6}],"intermediary_conclusions_formalized":[{"form":"(x): \u00ac${F2}x -> (${F4}x v ${F3}x)","ref_reco":2},{"form":"(x): \u00ac${F2}x -> ${F3}x","ref_reco":4}],"intermediary_conclusions":[{"ref_reco":2,"text":"If someone is not a nephew of Richard, then they are a half-brother of Lance or a son of Jeff."},{"ref_reco":4,"text":"If someone is not a nephew of Richard, then they are a son of Jeff."}],"distractors":[],"id":"5812d3a0-05d0-4e50-af62-416205f6ea22","predicate_placeholders":["F1","F2","F3","F4"],"entity_placeholders":[],"steps":3,"n_premises":3,"n_distractors":0,"base_scheme_groups":["hypothetical syllogism","generalized biconditional elimination","generalized disjunctive syllogism"],"scheme_variants":["transposition","negation variant","complex variant"],"domain_id":"male_relatives","domain_type":"persons","plcd_subs":{"F1":"great-grandfather of David","F2":"nephew of Richard","F3":"son of Jeff","F4":"half-brother of Lance"},"argdown_index_map":{"s0c":6,"s0p0":5,"s1c":4,"s1p1":3,"s2c":2,"s2p0":1},"presentation_parameters":{"resolve_steps":[],"direction":"forward","implicit_conclusion":"false","implicit_premise":"true","redundancy_frequency":0.1,"drop_conj_frequency":0.1,"start_sentence":[0,1]}},
{"title":"Football (AAAC, 4 steps, 0 distractors, 0 implicit premises, 3 implicit intermediary conclusions, implicit final conclusion)", "argument_source":"If, and only if, someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are an expert of Tottenham Hotspur or a friend of KRC Genk. And everybody who hasn't expert knowledge about Kilmarnock FC doesn't criticize Besiktas JK, and no expert of Kilmarnock FC has expert knowledge about Tottenham Hotspur, and vice versa.","argdown_reconstruction":"(1) If, and only if, someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are an expert of Tottenham Hotspur or a friend of KRC Genk.\n--\nwith generalized biconditional elimination (negation variant, complex variant) from (1)\n--\n(2) If someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are an expert of Tottenham Hotspur or a friend of KRC Genk.\n(3) If, and only if, someone is an expert of Kilmarnock FC, then they are not an expert of Tottenham Hotspur.\n--\nwith generalized biconditional elimination (negation variant) from (3)\n--\n(4) If someone is an expert of Kilmarnock FC, then they are not an expert of Tottenham Hotspur.\n(5) If someone is not an expert of Kilmarnock FC, then they are not a critic of Besiktas JK.\n--\nwith hypothetical syllogism (transposition, negation variant) from (4), (5)\n--\n(6) If someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are not an expert of Tottenham Hotspur.\n--\nwith generalized disjunctive syllogism from (2), (6)\n--\n(7) If someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are a friend of KRC Genk.","reason_statements":[{"text":"If, and only if, someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are an expert of Tottenham Hotspur or a friend of KRC Genk","starts_at":0,"ref_reco":1},{"text":"everybody who hasn't expert knowledge about Kilmarnock FC doesn't criticize Besiktas JK","starts_at":127,"ref_reco":5},{"text":"no expert of Kilmarnock FC has expert knowledge about Tottenham Hotspur, and vice versa","starts_at":220,"ref_reco":3}],"conclusion_statements":[],"premises":[{"ref_reco":1,"text":"If, and only if, someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are an expert of Tottenham Hotspur or a friend of KRC Genk.","explicit":"true"},{"ref_reco":3,"text":"If, and only if, someone is an expert of Kilmarnock FC, then they are not an expert of Tottenham Hotspur.","explicit":"true"},{"ref_reco":5,"text":"If someone is not an expert of Kilmarnock FC, then they are not a critic of Besiktas JK.","explicit":"true"}],"premises_formalized":[{"form":"(x): ${F1}x <-> (${F2}x v ${F3}x)","ref_reco":1},{"form":"(x): ${F4}x <-> \u00ac${F2}x","ref_reco":3},{"form":"(x): \u00ac${F4}x -> \u00ac${F1}x","ref_reco":5}],"conclusion":[{"ref_reco":7,"text":"If someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are a friend of KRC Genk."}],"conclusion_formalized":[{"form":"(x): ${F1}x -> ${F3}x","ref_reco":7}],"intermediary_conclusions_formalized":[{"form":"(x): ${F1}x -> (${F2}x v ${F3}x)","ref_reco":2},{"form":"(x): ${F4}x -> \u00ac${F2}x","ref_reco":4},{"form":"(x): ${F1}x -> \u00ac${F2}x","ref_reco":6}],"intermediary_conclusions":[{"ref_reco":2,"text":"If someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are an expert of Tottenham Hotspur or a friend of KRC Genk."},{"ref_reco":4,"text":"If someone is an expert of Kilmarnock FC, then they are not an expert of Tottenham Hotspur."},{"ref_reco":6,"text":"If someone is a critic of Besiktas JK, then they are not an expert of Tottenham Hotspur."}],"distractors":[],"id":"ead34d89-af68-4add-bb62-caff9043c90f","predicate_placeholders":["F1","F2","F3","F4"],"entity_placeholders":[],"steps":4,"n_premises":3,"n_distractors":0,"base_scheme_groups":["hypothetical syllogism","generalized biconditional elimination","generalized disjunctive syllogism"],"scheme_variants":["transposition","negation variant","complex variant"],"domain_id":"football_fans","domain_type":"persons","plcd_subs":{"F1":"critic of Besiktas JK","F2":"expert of Tottenham Hotspur","F3":"friend of KRC Genk","F4":"expert of Kilmarnock FC"},"argdown_index_map":{"s0c":7,"s1c":2,"s1p1":2,"s2c":6,"s2p0":5,"s1p0":1,"s3c":4,"s3p0":3},"presentation_parameters":{"resolve_steps":[1,2,3],"direction":"backward","implicit_conclusion":"true","implicit_premise":"false","redundancy_frequency":0.1,"drop_conj_frequency":0.1,"start_sentence":[0,2]}}
]
GEN_CHAINS = [
{"id":"straight (with formalization)","modes":['s => a','s => r','s => j','a => c','a => p','c => o','p+c+o => f']},
{"id":"straight (without formalization)","modes":['s => a','s => r','s => j']},
{"id":"hermeneutic cycle 1","modes":['s => a','s+a => r','s+a => j','r+j => a','a => c','a => p','c => o','p+c+o => f']},
{"id":"hermeneutic cycle 2","modes":['s => a','s+a => r','s+a => j','s+r+j => a','s+a => r','s+a => j','s+r+j => a','a => c','a => p','c => o','p+c+o => f']},
{"id":"logical streamlining","modes":['s => a','a => p','a => c','c => o','c+o => k','o+k => c','p+c => a','a => c','a => p','c => o','p+c+o => f']},
]
INFERENCE_PARAMS = {
'max_length':450,
# 'clean_up_tokenization_spaces': False,
'use_cache':False
}
HTML_WRAPPER = """<div style="overflow-x: auto; border: 1px solid #e6e9ef; border-radius: 0.25rem; padding: 1rem; margin-bottom: 2.5rem">{}</div>"""
CACHE_SIZE = 10000
def params(config):
pass
def build_inference_api():
inference = InferenceApi(
repo_id="debatelab/argument-analyst",
token=st.secrets['api_token']
)
return inference
#config.max_answer = 450
#config.max_seq_len = 450
#config.no_repeat_ngram_size = 0
@st.cache(allow_output_mutation=True)
def aaac_fields():
fields = []
for m in MODES:
fields = fields + m['from']
return set(sorted(fields))
# defines how to present reason and conclusion statements to the model
@st.cache(allow_output_mutation=True)
def format_statements_list(statements: list) -> str:
if len(statements)==0:
return "None"
list_as_string = ["%s (ref: (%s))" % (sdict['text'],sdict['ref_reco']) for sdict in statements]
list_as_string = " | ".join(list_as_string)
return list_as_string
# construct inference graph
@st.cache(allow_output_mutation=True)
def get_inference_graph(argdown_parsed,colors):
premise_template = """<
<TABLE BORDER="0" COLOR="#444444" CELLPADDING="10" CELLSPACING="2">
<TR><TD BORDER="0" BGCOLOR="{bgcolor}" STYLE="rounded"><FONT FACE="sans serif" POINT-SIZE="12"><B>({label})</B> {text}</FONT></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
>"""
conclusion_template = """<
<TABLE BORDER="0" COLOR="#444444" CELLPADDING="10" CELLSPACING="2">
<TR><TD BORDER="1" BGCOLOR="white" CELLPADDING="4"><FONT FACE="sans serif" POINT-SIZE="10">{inference}</FONT></TD></TR>
<TR><TD BORDER="0" BGCOLOR="{bgcolor}" STYLE="rounded"><FONT FACE="sans serif" POINT-SIZE="12"><B>({label})</B> {text}</FONT></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
>"""
g = graphviz.Digraph()
g.attr(ratio="compress", size="6,10", orientation='portrait',overlay="compress")
for item in argdown_parsed:
text = textwrap.wrap("(X) "+item['text'], width=30)
text='<BR/>'.join(text)[4:]
#g.attr('node',shape='box', fillcolor='#40e0d0', style='filled')
g.attr('node',shape='plaintext')
if len(item['uses'])==0:
g.node(
'node%d'%item['label'],
premise_template.format(text=text,label=item['label'],bgcolor=colors.get('P%d'%item['label'],'white')),
tooltip=textwrap.fill(item['text'], width=30)
)
else:
inference = "with <I>"+item['scheme']+"</I>"
if len(item['variants'])>0:
inference += " ("+(", ".join(item['variants']))+"):"
inference = textwrap.wrap(inference, width=40)
inference='<BR/>'.join(inference)
g.node(
'node%d'%item['label'],
conclusion_template.format(
text=text,
label=item['label'],
bgcolor=colors.get('C%d'%item['label'],'white'),
inference=inference
),
tooltip=textwrap.fill(item['text'], width=30)
)
for i in item['uses']:
g.edge('node%d'%i,'node%d'%item['label'])
return g
# get entities for displacy
@st.cache(allow_output_mutation=True)
def get_ds_entities(argument_source,s_parsed,type="reasons"):
if type=="reasons":
lab_templ="P%d"
color_profile = "mako_r"
elif type=="conclusions":
lab_templ="C%d"
color_profile = "rocket_r"
else:
return None,None
ents = []
colors = []
pointer = 0
for item in s_parsed:
reason = item['text']
if reason in argument_source:
idx_start = argument_source.index(reason, pointer)
idx_end = idx_start+len(reason)
pointer = idx_end
ents.append({
"start":idx_start, "end":idx_end, "label":lab_templ%item['ref_reco']
})
# construct colors for reason statements
palette = sns.color_palette(color_profile,round(3*len(ents))).as_hex()
colors = {ent["label"]:palette[i] for i,ent in enumerate(ents)}
return ents,colors
# format raw argdown (inserting line breaks)
@st.cache(allow_output_mutation=True)
def format_argdown(raw_argdown: str, colors=None) -> str:
if not raw_argdown:
return "No argument reconstruction to display."
all_colors = {('color('+str(i+1)+')'):'white' for i in range(20)}
if colors:
all_colors.update({('color('+k[1:]+')'):v for k,v in colors.items()})
def format_statement_block(s):
r = re.sub('(\([0-9]+\))', r'<br><b><span style="background-color:{color\1}">\1</span></b>', s)
r = r.format(**all_colors)
return r
format_inference_block = lambda s: "<br>--<br><i>"+s+"</i><br>--"
split = raw_argdown.split(' -- ')
argdown = format_statement_block(split[0])
i=1
while i<len(split):
argdown = argdown + format_inference_block(split[i])
if i<len(split)+1:
argdown = argdown + format_statement_block(split[i+1])
i = i+2
argdown = argdown[4:]# remove first linebreak
argdown = """<div style="font-family:monospace;font-size:14px">%s</div>"""%argdown
return argdown
# format formalization as markdown
@st.cache(allow_output_mutation=True)
def get_formalization_display(pform_parsed=None, cform_parsed=None):
# format premises and conclusion
premise_list = ['- `%s` (%d)'%(p['form'],p['ref_reco']) for p in pform_parsed]
premise_list = '\n'.join(premise_list)
conclusion = '- `%s` (%d)'%(cform_parsed[-1]['form'],cform_parsed[-1]['ref_reco'])
# check deductive validity
evaluator = aaac.AAACLogicEvaluator()
scheme = [p['form'] for p in pform_parsed]
scheme.append(cform_parsed[-1]['form'])
check = evaluator.check_deductive_validity(scheme)
if check==None:
eval_message = "(Couldn't parse formulas.)"
else:
check_token = "valid" if check else "invalid"
eval_message = "The inference from *premises* to *conclusion* is deductively **{check_token}**.".format(check_token=check_token)
# put everything together
display_formalization = """##### Premises:\n\n{premise_list}\n\n##### Conclusion:\n\n{conclusion}\n\n{eval_message}"""
display_formalization = display_formalization.format(premise_list=premise_list,conclusion=conclusion,eval_message=eval_message)
return display_formalization
def run_model(mode_set, user_input):
"""Main method for running the model
:param mode_set: the modes to run
:param user_input: the user input (dict)
:returns: output dict
"""
inference = build_inference_api()
current_input = user_input.copy()
output = []
for i,mode_id in enumerate(mode_set):
current_mode = next(m for m in MODES if m['id']==mode_id)
with st.spinner('Generating output %d of %d with mode %s'%(i,len(mode_set),mode_id)):
# construct prompt
inquire_prompt = ""
to_key = current_mode['to']
for from_key in current_mode['from']:
inquire_prompt = inquire_prompt + (f"{to_key}: {from_key}: {current_input[from_key]}")
# inquire model
inputs = inquire_prompt
out = inference(inputs,INFERENCE_PARAMS)
out = out[0]['generated_text']
# cleanup formalization
if to_key in ['premises_formalized','conclusion_formalized']:
out = out.replace("⁇","")
out = out.replace(" "," ")
#out = out+"-Hellooo!"
# write output
output.append({
'step':i,
'mode':current_mode,
'output':out,
'prompt':inquire_prompt
})
# update input
current_input[to_key] = out
return output
def main():
st.set_page_config(layout="wide")
st.title("DeepA2 ArgumentAnalyst Demo")
st.markdown(INTRO_TEXT, unsafe_allow_html=False)
## page details
# choose example data
ex_titles = [x['title'] for x in TEST_DATA]
ex_titles = ['...'] + ex_titles
ex_s = st.selectbox("1. Select an example...",ex_titles,index=0)
ex_item = TEST_DATA[ex_titles.index(ex_s)-1]
user_input = {}
# Source text
d = 'argument_source'
filler = d
if ex_s != '...':
filler = ex_item[d]
filler = filler.lower()
user_input[d] = st.text_area(
"...or enter a text to analyze (argument source):",filler,
height=250
)
if user_input[d]==d:
user_input[d] = ""
else:
user_input[d] = user_input[d].lower()
# modes
gen_chain_id_s = st.selectbox("2. Select a reconstruction strategy...",[x['id'] for x in GEN_CHAINS],index=0)
modes_s = next(x['modes'] for x in GEN_CHAINS if x['id']==gen_chain_id_s)
modes_s = st.multiselect(
"... or build a custom generative chain (argument source=`s`, reasons=`r`, conjectures=`j`, argdown reconstruction=`a`, premises=`p`, conclusion=`c`, premise formalization=`f`, conclusion formalization=`o`, keys=`k`):",
[m['id'] for m in MODES]*2,
modes_s#["s => a","s+a => r","s+a => j","a => c","a => p","c => o","p+c+o => f"]
)
# optional additional input
input_expander = st.expander(label='Additional input (optional)')
with input_expander:
# for every mode, add input field
for d in [m for m in aaac_fields() if m!="argument_source"]:
filler = d
if ex_s != '...':
filler = ex_item[d]
if d in ['reason_statements','conclusion_statements','conclusion','premises']:
filler = aaac.AAACLayouter.format_statements_list(filler)
elif d in ['premises_formalized','conclusion_formalized']:
filler = aaac.AAACLayouter.format_formalizations_list(filler)
elif d in ['plcd_subs']:
filler = aaac.AAACLayouter.format_plcd_subs(filler)
user_input[d] = st.text_area(
d,filler,
height=250
)
if user_input[d]==d:
user_input[d] = ""
## answer a query
submit = st.button("Process")
#row = []; index = []
#row_der = []; index_der = []
if submit:
if all(len(v)==0 for v in user_input.values()):
st.warning('Please choose an example, or provide input.')
else:
with st.spinner("Processing (may take a couple of minutes) ..."):
output = run_model(modes_s,user_input)
# get latest generated reasons, conclusions, argdown
argdown_raw = [out['output'] for out in output if out['mode']['to']=='argdown_reconstruction']
argdown_raw = argdown_raw[-1] if len(argdown_raw)>0 else None
reasons_raw = [out['output'] for out in output if out['mode']['to']=='reason_statements']
reasons_raw = reasons_raw[-1] if len(reasons_raw)>0 else None
concl_raw = [out['output'] for out in output if out['mode']['to']=='conclusion_statements']
concl_raw = concl_raw[-1] if len(concl_raw)>0 else None
pform_raw = [out['output'] for out in output if out['mode']['to']=='premises_formalized']
pform_raw = pform_raw[-1] if len(pform_raw)>0 else None
#pform_raw = "(x): F x -> (G x v H x) (ref: (1)) | (x): F x -> not G x (ref: (3))" # TEST
cform_raw = [out['output'] for out in output if out['mode']['to']=='conclusion_formalized']
cform_raw = cform_raw[-1] if len(cform_raw)>0 else None
#cform_raw = "(x): F x -> H x (ref: (4))" # TEST
# parse raw output
argdown_parsed = aaac.AAACParser.parse_argdown_block(argdown_raw) if argdown_raw else None
reasons_parsed = aaac.AAACParser.parse_statements(reasons_raw) if reasons_raw else None
concl_parsed = aaac.AAACParser.parse_statements(concl_raw) if concl_raw else None
pform_parsed = aaac.AAACParser.parse_formalizations(pform_raw) if pform_raw else None
cform_parsed = aaac.AAACParser.parse_formalizations(cform_raw) if cform_raw else None
# check syntactic validity
argdown_valid = (
aaac.ad_valid_syntax(argdown_parsed) &
aaac.ad_last_st_concl(argdown_parsed) &
aaac.used_prem_exist(argdown_parsed) #&
#1-aaac.prem_non_used(argdown_parsed)
) if argdown_parsed else False
reasons_valid = (
aaac.s_ord_me_subsseq(reasons_parsed,user_input['argument_source'])
) if reasons_parsed else False
concl_valid = (
aaac.s_ord_me_subsseq(concl_parsed,user_input['argument_source'])
) if concl_parsed else False
reasons_concl_mc = (
aaac.reason_concl_mutually_exclusive(reasons_parsed,concl_parsed)
) if reasons_parsed and concl_parsed else False
pform_valid = True if pform_parsed else False
cform_valid = True if cform_parsed else False
# get and merge entities and colors for displacy
ents = []
colors={}
if concl_valid:
ents,colors = get_ds_entities(user_input['argument_source'],concl_parsed,type="conclusions")
if reasons_valid and reasons_concl_mc:
ents_r,colors_r = get_ds_entities(user_input['argument_source'],reasons_parsed,type="reasons")
ents= ents+ents_r
colors.update(colors_r)
ents = sorted(ents, key=lambda item: item["start"])
elif reasons_valid:
ents,colors = get_ds_entities(user_input['argument_source'],reasons_parsed,type="reasons")
options = {"colors":colors}
ex = [{"text": user_input['argument_source'],"ents": ents,"title": None}]
displacy_html = displacy.render(ex, style="ent", options=options, manual=True)
graphviz_graph = get_inference_graph(argdown_parsed,colors) if argdown_valid else None
# Show output
col_source, col_reco = st.columns(2)
with col_source:
st.markdown(f'<div style="font-size: small">Reasons and conclusions in source text</div>',unsafe_allow_html=True)
st.write(HTML_WRAPPER.format(displacy_html), unsafe_allow_html=True)
with col_reco:
ig_expander = st.expander(label='Argument reconstruction (inference graph)', expanded=argdown_valid)
with ig_expander:
if argdown_valid:
st.graphviz_chart(graphviz_graph,use_container_width=True)
else:
st.write("No inference graph to display.")
lgc_expander = st.expander(label='Formalization', expanded=(pform_valid and cform_valid))
with lgc_expander:
if pform_valid and cform_valid:
st.markdown(get_formalization_display(pform_parsed=pform_parsed, cform_parsed=cform_parsed))
else:
st.write("No formalization to display.")
ad_expander = st.expander(label='Argument reconstruction (argdown snippet)', expanded=(not argdown_valid))
with ad_expander:
st.write(format_argdown(argdown_raw,colors), unsafe_allow_html=True)
history_expander = st.expander(label='Full history', expanded=False)
with history_expander:
st.write(output)
#for out in output:
# st.write("step: %d, mode: %s" % (out['step'],out['mode']['id']))
# output_f = format_argdown(out['output']) if out['mode']['to']=='argdown_reconstruction' else out['output']
# st.write(output_f, unsafe_allow_html=True)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
|