lgaalves's picture
Adding Evaluation Results (#3)
206b4f3
|
raw
history blame
3.16 kB
metadata
license: mit
datasets:
  - garage-bAInd/Open-Platypus
  - lgaalves/camel-ai-physics
language:
  - en
pipeline_tag: text-generation

lgaalves/gpt2_camel_physics-platypus

lgaalves/gpt2_camel_physics-platypuss is an instruction fine-tuned model based on the GPT-2 transformer architecture.

Benchmark Metrics

Metric lgaalves/gpt2_camel_physics-platypus gpt2 (base)
Avg. - 29.9
ARC (25-shot) - 21.84
HellaSwag (10-shot) - 31.6
MMLU (5-shot) - 25.86
TruthfulQA (0-shot) - 40.67

We use state-of-the-art Language Model Evaluation Harness to run the benchmark tests above, using the same version as the HuggingFace LLM Leaderboard. Please see below for detailed instructions on reproducing benchmark results.

Model Details

  • Trained by: Luiz G A Alves
  • Model type: gpt2_open-platypus is an auto-regressive language model based on the GPT-2 transformer architecture.
  • Language(s): English

How to use:

# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper
>>> from transformers import pipeline
>>> pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="lgaalves/gpt2_camel_physics-platypus")
>>> question = "What is a large language model?"
>>> answer = pipe(question)
>>> print(answer[0]['generated_text'])

or, you can load the model direclty using:

# Load model directly
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("lgaalves/gpt2_camel_physics-platypus")
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("lgaalves/gpt2_camel_physics-platypus")

Training Dataset

lgaalves/gpt2_open-platypus trained using STEM and logic based dataset garage-bAInd/Open-Platypus and the GPT4 generated dataset lgaalves/camel-physics.

Training Procedure

lgaalves/gpt2_camel_physics-platypus was instruction fine-tuned using LoRA on 1 v100 GPU on Google Colab. It took about 17 minutes to train it.

Intended uses, limitations & biases

You can use the raw model for text generation or fine-tune it to a downstream task. The model was not extensively tested and may produce false information. It contains a lot of unfiltered content from the internet, which is far from neutral.

Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results

Detailed results can be found here

Metric Value
Avg. 25.04
ARC (25-shot) 23.04
HellaSwag (10-shot) 31.32
MMLU (5-shot) 26.91
TruthfulQA (0-shot) 39.56
Winogrande (5-shot) 49.64
GSM8K (5-shot) 0.0
DROP (3-shot) 4.79