massive thank you to @silveroxides for phenomenal work collecting pristine state dicts and related information
MIR (Machine Intelligence Resource)
MIR is a naming standard, a proposed schema for AIGC/ML work.
In its current incarnation, it looks like this:
mir : model . transformer . clip-l : stable-diffusion-xl
uri : model . lora . hyper : flux-1
β β β β β
mir:[domain].[architecture].[implementation]:[compatibility]
The solution is provided as a remedy to patch the fractionalization of modelspec standards between development houses (such as models released independently or indifferently to HF.CO ) and to archive metadata which would otherwise remain incomplete.
This work was inspired by the CivitAi AIR-URN project
and by the super-resolution registry code from the Spandrel library.
Goals
- Standard identification scheme for ALL ML-related development
- Simplification of code for model-related logistics
- Rapid retrieval of resources and metadata
- Efficient and reliable compatability checks
- Organized hyperparameter management
Why not use `diffusion`/`sgm`, `ldm`/`text`/hf.co folder-structure/brand-specific trade word/preprint paper/development house/algorithm
- Exact frameworks (SGM/LDM/RectifiedFlow) includes too few
- Diffusion/Transformer are too broad, share and overlap resources
- Multimodal models complicate content terms (Text/Image/Vision/etc)
- HF.CO names do all of this & become inconsistent across folders/files
- Development credit often shared (ex RunwayML with Stable Diffusion)
- Paper heredity would be a neat tree, but it complicates retrieval
- Algorithms (esp application) are less common knowledge, vague,
and I'm too smooth-brain.- Impartiality
Why `unet`, `dit`, `lora` over alternatives
- UNET/DiT/Transformer are shared enough to be genre-ish but not too narrowly specific
- Very similar technical process on this level
- Functional and efficient for random lookups
Roadmap
- Decide on
@
(like @8cfg for an indistinguishable 8 step lora that requires cfg) -- crucial spec element, or an optional, MIR app-determined feature?- Proof of concept generative model registry
- Ensure compatability/integration/cross-pollenation with OECD AI Classifications
- Ensure compatability/integration/cross-pollenation with NIST AI 200-1 NIST Trustworthy and Responsible AI
Inference Providers
NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider.
π
Ask for provider support
HF Inference deployability: The model has no library tag.