|
# DiagramQG Dataset
|
|
|
|
![Dataset Examples](example.pdf)
|
|
*Figure 1: Four different examples of different subjects in DiagramQG dataset.*
|
|
|
|
![Domain Distribution](course.pdf)
|
|
*Figure 2: Domain diversity in DiagramQG. Each color corresponds to one subject: Natural Science (blue), Earth Science (yellow), Applied Science (green), and Social Science (orange).*
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
DiagramQG is a comprehensive educational dataset focused on scientific diagram question generation. It contains:
|
|
|
|
- 19,475 unique questions
|
|
- 8,372 diagrams
|
|
- 44,472 combinations of (target & concept text constraint, diagram, question)
|
|
- Coverage across 4 subjects, 15 courses, and 169 concepts
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Structure
|
|
|
|
### Subject Areas
|
|
The dataset covers four main subject areas:
|
|
- Natural Science
|
|
- Earth Science
|
|
- Applied Science
|
|
- Social Science
|
|
|
|
### Hierarchical Organization
|
|
Data is organized hierarchically:
|
|
1. Subject (e.g., Natural Science)
|
|
2. Course (e.g., Biology)
|
|
3. Concept (e.g., Ecological interactions)
|
|
|
|
## Data Collection Process
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Initial Data Gathering
|
|
- Sources: Existing datasets and Google Image Search
|
|
- Raw dataset: 20,000+ diagrams and 40,000+ questions
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Organization
|
|
- Classification into 4 subjects and 15 courses
|
|
- Mapping questions to 169 distinct concepts
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Annotation
|
|
- Trained crowd workers annotate:
|
|
- Target & concept text constraints
|
|
- Diagram elements and texts
|
|
- Produced 70,000+ unique combinations
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Quality Assurance
|
|
- Secondary crowd worker evaluation (0-100 scale)
|
|
- Filtered combinations below 60 points
|
|
- Final dataset: 44,472 validated combinations
|
|
|
|
## Dataset Analysis
|
|
|
|
### Question Distribution
|
|
![Question Distribution](sunburst_chart_hd.png)
|
|
*Figure 3: Question distribution in DiagramQG.*
|
|
|
|
### Concept Distribution
|
|
![Concept Distribution](proportions_plot_v6.png)
|
|
*Figure 4: Distribution of diagrams, questions, and questions per diagram ratios across different concepts in DiagramQG.*
|
|
|
|
### Dataset Comparison
|
|
| Dataset | Questions | Images | Objects/Image | Image Type | Constraints | Knowledge Type |
|
|
|---------|-----------|---------|---------------|------------|-------------|----------------|
|
|
| VQAv2.0 | 1.1M | 20k | 3.5 | natural | answer | N/A |
|
|
| FVQA | 5,826 | 2k | 2.9 | natural | answer | common-sense |
|
|
| VQG-COCO | 25,000 | 5k | 3.3 | natural | image, caption | common-sense |
|
|
| K-VQG | 16,098 | 13K | 2.7 | natural | knowledge triple | common-sense |
|
|
| DiagramQG | 19,475 | 8,372 | 11.2 | diagram | target, concept | subject knowledge |
|
|
|
|
## Unique Challenges
|
|
|
|
1. **Domain-specific Knowledge Requirement**
|
|
- Requires understanding of specialized subject concepts
|
|
- Goes beyond common sense reasoning
|
|
|
|
2. **Long-tail Distribution**
|
|
- Uneven concept coverage
|
|
- Challenges in model generalization
|
|
|
|
3. **High Information Density**
|
|
- Complex diagram interpretation
|
|
- Dense visual information processing |