Datasets:
File size: 9,332 Bytes
0a5561a acb6b54 0a5561a acb6b54 878d0d9 0a5561a 7f03b43 0a5561a 7f03b43 aab1a1e 0a5561a 7f03b43 0a5561a |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 |
---
annotations_creators:
- expert-generated
language_creators:
- expert-generated
language:
- en
license:
- cc-by-4.0
multilinguality:
- monolingual
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
source_datasets:
- original
task_categories:
- text-classification
task_ids:
- intent-classification
- multi-class-classification
paperswithcode_id: null
pretty_name: NLU Evaluation Data
---
# Dataset Card for NLU Evaluation Data
## Table of Contents
- [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
- [Dataset Summary](#dataset-summary)
- [Supported Tasks and Leaderboards](#supported-tasks-and-leaderboards)
- [Languages](#languages)
- [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
- [Data Instances](#data-instances)
- [Data Fields](#data-fields)
- [Data Splits](#data-splits)
- [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
- [Curation Rationale](#curation-rationale)
- [Source Data](#source-data)
- [Annotations](#annotations)
- [Personal and Sensitive Information](#personal-and-sensitive-information)
- [Considerations for Using the Data](#considerations-for-using-the-data)
- [Social Impact of Dataset](#social-impact-of-dataset)
- [Discussion of Biases](#discussion-of-biases)
- [Other Known Limitations](#other-known-limitations)
- [Additional Information](#additional-information)
- [Dataset Curators](#dataset-curators)
- [Licensing Information](#licensing-information)
- [Citation Information](#citation-information)
- [Contributions](#contributions)
## Dataset Description
- **Homepage:** [Github](https://github.com/xliuhw/NLU-Evaluation-Data)
- **Repository:** [Github](https://github.com/xliuhw/NLU-Evaluation-Data)
- **Paper:** [ArXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05566)
- **Leaderboard:**
- **Point of Contact:** [x.liu@hw.ac.uk](mailto:x.liu@hw.ac.uk)
### Dataset Summary
Dataset with short utterances from conversational domain annotated with their corresponding intents and scenarios.
It has 25 715 non-zero examples (original dataset has 25716 examples) belonging to 18 scenarios and 68 intents.
Originally, the dataset was crowd-sourced and annotated with both intents and named entities
in order to evaluate commercial NLU systems such as RASA, IBM's Watson, Microsoft's LUIS and Google's Dialogflow.
**This version of the dataset only includes intent annotations!**
In contrast to paper claims, released data contains 68 unique intents. This is due to the fact, that NLU systems were
evaluated on more curated part of this dataset which only included 64 most important intents. Read more in [github issue](https://github.com/xliuhw/NLU-Evaluation-Data/issues/5).
### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
Intent classification, intent detection
### Languages
English
## Dataset Structure
### Data Instances
An example of 'train' looks as follows:
```
{
'label': 2, # integer label corresponding to "alarm_set" intent
'scenario': 'alarm',
'text': 'wake me up at five am this week'
}
```
### Data Fields
- `text`: a string feature.
- `label`: one of classification labels (0-67) corresponding to unique intents.
- `scenario`: a string with one of unique scenarios (18).
Intent names are mapped to `label` in the following way:
| label | intent |
|--------:|:-------------------------|
| 0 | alarm_query |
| 1 | alarm_remove |
| 2 | alarm_set |
| 3 | audio_volume_down |
| 4 | audio_volume_mute |
| 5 | audio_volume_other |
| 6 | audio_volume_up |
| 7 | calendar_query |
| 8 | calendar_remove |
| 9 | calendar_set |
| 10 | cooking_query |
| 11 | cooking_recipe |
| 12 | datetime_convert |
| 13 | datetime_query |
| 14 | email_addcontact |
| 15 | email_query |
| 16 | email_querycontact |
| 17 | email_sendemail |
| 18 | general_affirm |
| 19 | general_commandstop |
| 20 | general_confirm |
| 21 | general_dontcare |
| 22 | general_explain |
| 23 | general_greet |
| 24 | general_joke |
| 25 | general_negate |
| 26 | general_praise |
| 27 | general_quirky |
| 28 | general_repeat |
| 29 | iot_cleaning |
| 30 | iot_coffee |
| 31 | iot_hue_lightchange |
| 32 | iot_hue_lightdim |
| 33 | iot_hue_lightoff |
| 34 | iot_hue_lighton |
| 35 | iot_hue_lightup |
| 36 | iot_wemo_off |
| 37 | iot_wemo_on |
| 38 | lists_createoradd |
| 39 | lists_query |
| 40 | lists_remove |
| 41 | music_dislikeness |
| 42 | music_likeness |
| 43 | music_query |
| 44 | music_settings |
| 45 | news_query |
| 46 | play_audiobook |
| 47 | play_game |
| 48 | play_music |
| 49 | play_podcasts |
| 50 | play_radio |
| 51 | qa_currency |
| 52 | qa_definition |
| 53 | qa_factoid |
| 54 | qa_maths |
| 55 | qa_stock |
| 56 | recommendation_events |
| 57 | recommendation_locations |
| 58 | recommendation_movies |
| 59 | social_post |
| 60 | social_query |
| 61 | takeaway_order |
| 62 | takeaway_query |
| 63 | transport_query |
| 64 | transport_taxi |
| 65 | transport_ticket |
| 66 | transport_traffic |
| 67 | weather_query |
### Data Splits
| Dataset statistics | Train |
| --- | --- |
| Number of examples | 25 715 |
| Average character length | 34.32 |
| Number of intents | 68 |
| Number of scenarios | 18 |
## Dataset Creation
### Curation Rationale
The dataset was prepared for a wide coverage evaluation and comparison of some of the most popular NLU services.
At that time, previous benchmarks were done with few intents and spawning limited number of domains. Here, the dataset
is much larger and contains 68 intents from 18 scenarios, which is much larger that any previous evaluation. For more discussion see the paper.
### Source Data
#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization
[More Information Needed]
#### Who are the source language producers?
[More Information Needed]
### Annotations
#### Annotation process
> To build the NLU component we collected real user data via Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT). We designed tasks where the Turker’s goal was to answer questions about how people would interact with the home robot, in a wide range of scenarios designed in advance, namely: alarm, audio, audiobook, calendar, cooking, datetime, email, game, general, IoT, lists, music, news, podcasts, general Q&A, radio, recommendations, social, food takeaway, transport, and weather.
The questions put to Turkers were designed to capture the different requests within each given scenario.
In the ‘calendar’ scenario, for example, these pre-designed intents were included: ‘set event’, ‘delete event’ and ‘query event’.
An example question for intent ‘set event’ is: “How would you ask your PDA to schedule a meeting with someone?” for which a user’s answer example was “Schedule a chat with Adam on Thursday afternoon”.
The Turkers would then type in their answers to these questions and select possible entities from the pre-designed suggested entities list for each of their answers.The Turkers didn’t always follow the instructions fully, e.g. for the specified ‘delete event’ Intent, an answer was: “PDA what is my next event?”; which clearly belongs to ‘query event’ Intent.
We have manually corrected all such errors either during post-processing or the subsequent annotations.
#### Who are the annotators?
[More Information Needed]
### Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
## Considerations for Using the Data
### Social Impact of Dataset
The purpose of this dataset it to help develop better intent detection systems.
### Discussion of Biases
[More Information Needed]
### Other Known Limitations
[More Information Needed]
## Additional Information
### Dataset Curators
[More Information Needed]
### Licensing Information
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
### Citation Information
```
@InProceedings{XLiu.etal:IWSDS2019,
author = {Xingkun Liu, Arash Eshghi, Pawel Swietojanski and Verena Rieser},
title = {Benchmarking Natural Language Understanding Services for building Conversational Agents},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems Technology (IWSDS)},
month = {April},
year = {2019},
address = {Ortigia, Siracusa (SR), Italy},
publisher = {Springer},
pages = {xxx--xxx},
url = {http://www.xx.xx/xx/}
}
```
### Contributions
Thanks to [@dkajtoch](https://github.com/dkajtoch) for adding this dataset.
|