Datasets:
File size: 6,726 Bytes
5792bfb d8a13cd 5792bfb d8a13cd 5f9512d 5792bfb f8b41a0 27b0bf0 ef375a2 47fa199 27b0bf0 6a3c3d4 f7c625f 6a3c3d4 5792bfb 4fd862c 5792bfb ef375a2 5792bfb ef375a2 5792bfb bd9eea4 5792bfb f8b41a0 5792bfb 4fd862c 5792bfb bd9eea4 27b0bf0 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 |
---
annotations_creators:
- crowdsourced
language_creators:
- crowdsourced
language:
- en
license:
- cc-by-sa-4.0
multilinguality:
- monolingual
size_categories:
- 10K<n<100K
source_datasets:
- original
task_categories:
- text2text-generation
task_ids: []
paperswithcode_id: e2e
pretty_name: End-to-End NLG Challenge
tags:
- meaning-representation-to-text
dataset_info:
features:
- name: meaning_representation
dtype: string
- name: human_reference
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 9435824
num_examples: 42061
- name: validation
num_bytes: 1171723
num_examples: 4672
- name: test
num_bytes: 1320205
num_examples: 4693
download_size: 11812316
dataset_size: 11927752
---
# Dataset Card for End-to-End NLG Challenge
## Table of Contents
- [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
- [Dataset Summary](#dataset-summary)
- [Supported Tasks and Leaderboards](#supported-tasks-and-leaderboards)
- [Languages](#languages)
- [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
- [Data Instances](#data-instances)
- [Data Fields](#data-fields)
- [Data Splits](#data-splits)
- [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
- [Curation Rationale](#curation-rationale)
- [Source Data](#source-data)
- [Annotations](#annotations)
- [Personal and Sensitive Information](#personal-and-sensitive-information)
- [Considerations for Using the Data](#considerations-for-using-the-data)
- [Social Impact of Dataset](#social-impact-of-dataset)
- [Discussion of Biases](#discussion-of-biases)
- [Other Known Limitations](#other-known-limitations)
- [Additional Information](#additional-information)
- [Dataset Curators](#dataset-curators)
- [Licensing Information](#licensing-information)
- [Citation Information](#citation-information)
- [Contributions](#contributions)
## Dataset Description
- **Homepage:** [homepage](http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/InteractionLab/E2E/)
- **Repository:** [repository](https://github.com/tuetschek/e2e-dataset/)
- **Paper:** [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09254)
- **Leaderboard:** [leaderboard](http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/InteractionLab/E2E/)
### Dataset Summary
The E2E dataset is used for training end-to-end, data-driven natural language generation systems in the restaurant domain, which is ten times bigger than existing, frequently used datasets in this area.
The E2E dataset poses new challenges:
(1) its human reference texts show more lexical richness and syntactic variation, including discourse phenomena;
(2) generating from this set requires content selection. As such, learning from this dataset promises more natural, varied and less template-like system utterances.
E2E is released in the following paper where you can find more details and baseline results:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09254
### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
- `text2text-generation-other-meaning-representation-to-text`: The dataset can be used to train a model to generate descriptions in the restaurant domain from meaning representations, which consists in taking as input some data about a restaurant and generate a sentence in natural language that presents the different aspects of the data about the restaurant.. Success on this task is typically measured by achieving a *high* [BLEU](https://huggingface.co/metrics/bleu), [NIST](https://huggingface.co/metrics/nist), [METEOR](https://huggingface.co/metrics/meteor), [Rouge-L](https://huggingface.co/metrics/rouge), [CIDEr](https://huggingface.co/metrics/cider). The TGen model (Dusek and Jurcıcek, 2016a) was used a baseline, had the following scores:
| | BLEU | NIST | METEOR | ROUGE_L | CIDEr |
| -------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ |
| BASELINE | 0.6593 | 8.6094 | 0.4483 | 0.6850 | 2.2338 |
This task has an inactive leaderboard which can be found [here](http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/InteractionLab/E2E/) and ranks models based on the metrics above.
### Languages
The dataset is in english (en).
## Dataset Structure
### Data Instances
Example of one instance:
```
{'human_reference': 'The Vaults pub near Café Adriatic has a 5 star rating. Prices start at £30.',
'meaning_representation': 'name[The Vaults], eatType[pub], priceRange[more than £30], customer rating[5 out of 5], near[Café Adriatic]'}
```
### Data Fields
- `human_reference`: string, the text is natural language that describes the different characteristics in the meaning representation
- `meaning_representation`: list of slots and values to generate a description from
Each MR consists of 3–8 attributes (slots), such as name, food or area, and their values.
### Data Splits
The dataset is split into training, validation and testing sets (in a 76.5-8.5-15 ratio), keeping a similar distribution of MR and reference text lengths and ensuring that MRs in different sets are distinct.
| | train | validation | test |
| ----- |-------:|------------:|------:|
| N. Instances | 42061 | 4672 | 4693 |
## Dataset Creation
### Curation Rationale
[More Information Needed]
### Source Data
[More Information Needed]
#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization
The data was collected using the CrowdFlower platform and quality-controlled following Novikova et al. (2016).
#### Who are the source language producers?
[More Information Needed]
### Annotations
Following Novikova et al. (2016), the E2E data was collected using pictures as stimuli, which was shown to elicit significantly more natural, more informative, and better phrased human references than textual MRs.
#### Annotation process
[More Information Needed]
#### Who are the annotators?
[More Information Needed]
### Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
## Considerations for Using the Data
### Social Impact of Dataset
[More Information Needed]
### Discussion of Biases
[More Information Needed]
### Other Known Limitations
[More Information Needed]
## Additional Information
### Dataset Curators
[More Information Needed]
### Licensing Information
[More Information Needed]
### Citation Information
```
@article{dusek.etal2020:csl,
title = {Evaluating the {{State}}-of-the-{{Art}} of {{End}}-to-{{End Natural Language Generation}}: {{The E2E NLG Challenge}}},
author = {Du{\v{s}}ek, Ond\v{r}ej and Novikova, Jekaterina and Rieser, Verena},
year = {2020},
month = jan,
volume = {59},
pages = {123--156},
doi = {10.1016/j.csl.2019.06.009},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
eprint = {1901.11528},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
journal = {Computer Speech \& Language}
```
### Contributions
Thanks to [@lhoestq](https://github.com/lhoestq) for adding this dataset. |