premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Anabelle is not reliable. | entailment |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Hector is dishonest. | contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Anabelle is not dishonest. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Kiefer is not pleasant. | neutral |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Konrad is not wooden. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Kiefer is dishonest. | neutral |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Hector is not sleepy. | neutral |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Anabelle is dishonest. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Ives is pleasant. | entailment |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Alexis is not distracted. | entailment |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Ives is distracted. | neutral |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Trent is not pleasant. | contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Anabelle is reliable. | contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Anabelle is not wooden. | contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Alexis is not sleepy. | neutral |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Alexis is wooden. | entailment |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Konrad is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Ives is wooden. | entailment |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Konrad is not pleasant. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is not sleepy.
Anabelle is not distracted.
Anabelle is not pleasant.
Alexis is not reliable.
Hector is not distracted.
Ives is wooden.
Konrad is distracted.
Alexis is not pleasant.
Konrad is not wooden.
Alexis is not distracted.
Trent is pleasant.
Anabelle is dishonest.Someone is not reliable and wooden if and only if he is not pleasant.
Someone being both not pleasant and not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
Someone who is eithor not distracted or not reliable is always not dishonest.
If someone is not sleepy, then he is wooden.
Ives being not reliable implies that Anabelle is pleasant.
Someone who is both distracted and dishonest is always reliable.
Someone being not wooden is equivalent to being distracted.
If there is at least one people who is both not sleepy and wooden, then Hector is reliable.
Konrad being not distracted is equivalent to Kiefer being wooden and Konrad being not sleepy.
Kiefer is not dishonest if and only if Trent is reliable and Ives is not wooden.
If Anabelle is not reliable, then Ives is pleasant, and vice versa.
If someone is sleepy or not wooden, then he is pleasant. | Konrad is reliable. | contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Travis is not thoughtless. | contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Horace is not successful. | entailment |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Jonathan is thoughtless. | entailment |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Philbert is thoughtless. | neutral |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Hall is not bloody. | neutral |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Travis is shy. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Curtis is romantic. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Johnny is busy. | neutral |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Travis is not bloody. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Johnny is not successful. | contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Travis is romantic. | entailment |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Horace is successful. | contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Johnny is shy. | contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Horace is not romantic. | neutral |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Curtis is bloody. | self_contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Hall is not busy. | contradiction |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Curtis is shy. | entailment |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Jonathan is not busy. | entailment |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Philbert is shy. | neutral |
Curtis is not bloody.
Hall is thoughtless.
Jonathan is thoughtless.
Curtis is not romantic.
Jonathan is successful.
Curtis is thoughtless.
Hall is not romantic.
Travis is not shy.
Horace is not successful.
Travis is not bloody.
Jonathan is not bloody.
Johnny is successful.As long as someone is not busy, he is romantic and not successful.
If Travis is successful, then Johnny is not shy and Jonathan is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is shy, then Travis is not successful and Johnny is not thoughtless.
Horace being romantic or Johnny being bloody implies that Travis is not busy.
Someone is successful and thoughtless if and only if he is shy.
If someone is not romantic, then he is busy, and vice versa.
Someone being not bloody is equivalent to being romantic.
Someone who is both shy and not successful is always bloody.
If there is at least one people who is both busy and shy, then Hall is not successful.
Someone being both not busy and thoughtless is equivalent to being not bloody.
If someone is not bloody, then he is both shy and thoughtless.
If someone is not thoughtless, then he is successful. | Jonathan is bloody. | self_contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Louis is not sane. | entailment |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Louis is not determined. | contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Brock is not determined. | entailment |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Louis is plain. | self_contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Louis is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Paxton is determined. | entailment |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Lucia is not plain. | neutral |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Adrian is not plain. | neutral |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Adrian is not sane. | entailment |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Paxton is not determined. | contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Leonard is annoyed. | contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Adrian is plain. | neutral |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Jarvis is sane. | self_contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Jarvis is not determined. | neutral |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Jarvis is not plain. | neutral |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Leonard is not wooden. | contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Paxton is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Jarvis is brave. | contradiction |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Jarvis is not brave. | entailment |
Brock is plain.
Paxton is brave.
Paxton is plain.
Lucia is not determined.
Leonard is not annoyed.
Leonard is brave.
Leonard is wooden.
Adrian is not sane.
Jarvis is not sane.
Jarvis is wooden.
Louis is not sane.
Louis is not wooden.If there is someone who is both not annoyed and not plain, then Paxton is sane and Jarvis is wooden.
If someone is annoyed or not plain, then he is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Louis is sane and Adrian is not plain once knowing that Jarvis is not determined.
If there is someone who is both wooden and brave, then Brock is not determined.
If there is someone who is not wooden, then Paxton is not sane and Louis is brave.
Someone being not brave is equivalent to being not sane.
If someone is both plain and brave, then he is determined.
Someone who is eithor determined or not annoyed is always not brave.
Someone who is wooden is always both sane and not brave.
As long as someone is not wooden, he is plain and not sane.
If Jarvis is determined and Lucia is sane, then Lucia is wooden.
If there is at least one people who is annoyed or sane, then Louis is not plain. | Leonard is not sane. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Shawn is not miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Quade is tidy. | contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Leona is not tidy. | contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Quade is not psychological. | entailment |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Jorge is tidy. | contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Shawn is not psychological. | neutral |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Hope is psychological. | entailment |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Hope is dizzy. | neutral |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Ambrose is psychological. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Baldwin is psychological. | neutral |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Jorge is old-fashioned. | contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Quade is psychological. | contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Jorge is not neat. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Shawn is tidy. | neutral |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Quade is not tidy. | entailment |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Jorge is neat. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Jorge is not old-fashioned. | entailment |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Shawn is miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Hope is not neat. | neutral |
Baldwin is not neat.
Ambrose is not neat.
Hope is psychological.
Shawn is not miniscule.
Ambrose is miniscule.
Leona is tidy.
Jorge is dizzy.
Quade is neat.
Ambrose is psychological.
Ambrose is not tidy.
Ambrose is old-fashioned.
Quade is miniscule.It can be concluded that Quade is dizzy once knowing that Baldwin is neat.
If there is at least one people who is both not old-fashioned and not neat, then Shawn is dizzy.
If Quade is dizzy, then Hope is not miniscule and Quade is not tidy.
If Jorge is not tidy, then Ambrose is not neat, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is miniscule, then Baldwin is not old-fashioned and Jorge is neat.
Baldwin being old-fashioned is equivalent to Leona being miniscule.
Someone is not neat if and only if he is not tidy.
Quade being not dizzy or Ambrose being psychological implies that Shawn is miniscule.
If someone is dizzy and not tidy, then he is neat, and vice versa.
Someone is not old-fashioned and not miniscule if and only if he is not neat.
Someone is not tidy and miniscule if and only if he is not old-fashioned and not psychological.
If all people are dizzy or miniscule, then Leona is old-fashioned. | Jorge is not miniscule. | entailment |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Halden is polite. | contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Samson is embarrassed. | entailment |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Timothy is excited. | contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Samson is excited. | entailment |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Halden is not sexual. | self_contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Samson is sexual. | self_contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Cedric is not sexual. | entailment |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Halden is not embarrassed. | neutral |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Cedric is polite. | contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Halden is not black. | self_contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Cedric is not embarrassed. | neutral |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Kelsey is sexual. | contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Cedric is not polite. | entailment |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Samson is black. | self_contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Cedric is not black. | neutral |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Timothy is not rainy. | neutral |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Kelsey is not sexual. | entailment |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Samson is not embarrassed. | contradiction |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Timothy is black. | neutral |
Vera is embarrassed.
Samson is rainy.
Halden is not black.
Kelsey is not sexual.
Kelsey is not embarrassed.
Samson is black.
Timothy is not excited.
Lucy is excited.
Cedric is not polite.
Timothy is embarrassed.
Samson is not polite.
Samson is not sexual.Halden being not rainy is equivalent to Samson being embarrassed.
If Kelsey is not black or Kelsey is embarrassed, then Halden is not excited.
Kelsey being excited is equivalent to Halden being not embarrassed.
If someone is excited and black, then he is both not rainy and not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite and not black, then he is sexual and not rainy.
If everyone is rainy or not excited, then Timothy is not embarrassed.
Vera being not sexual is equivalent to Samson being not black and Cedric being not embarrassed.
If someone is rainy and not polite, then he is not black, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Vera is polite and Cedric is not sexual once knowing that Timothy is excited and Vera is embarrassed.
If Timothy is not sexual, then Samson is not excited.
If everyone is sexual, then Timothy is not black and Halden is not rainy.
Someone is not sexual if and only if he is not polite. | Halden is not rainy. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.