premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Kathie is not odd. | neutral |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Camille is shiny. | contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Morris is not shiny. | entailment |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Kathie is strict. | neutral |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Jed is not adventurous. | entailment |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Kathie is friendly. | entailment |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Camille is not shiny. | entailment |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Jed is not strict. | contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Kathie is not friendly. | contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Morris is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Morris is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Isaiah is strict. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Harvey is not inquisitive. | neutral |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Kathie is odd. | neutral |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Isaiah is odd. | neutral |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Morris is inquisitive. | contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Jed is not friendly. | entailment |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Camille is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Morris is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Coleman is not inquisitive.
Morris is adventurous.
Camille is friendly.
Morris is not odd.
Isaiah is not friendly.
Isaiah is not strict.
Morris is not inquisitive.
Jed is not inquisitive.
Coleman is not odd.
Kathie is adventurous.
Harvey is not strict.
Camille is not shiny.Harvey being odd implies that Coleman is not friendly and Kathie is not shiny.
Someone being strict is equivalent to being not friendly.
If someone is not shiny, then he is odd.
Kathie being inquisitive and Kathie being not strict imply that Morris is adventurous.
If Kathie is friendly, then Morris is not adventurous and Coleman is not inquisitive, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is inquisitive or not strict, then Kathie is friendly.
If someone is odd or he is not inquisitive, then he is not friendly.
Morris being friendly is equivalent to Harvey being not shiny and Coleman being not inquisitive.
Someone who is eithor strict or not inquisitive is always not adventurous.
Morris is friendly if and only if Kathie is inquisitive.
Kathie being inquisitive or Camille being shiny implies that Harvey is not strict.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not strict, then Morris is not shiny. | Morris is not strict. | contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Kayla is medical. | entailment |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Barclay is medical. | neutral |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Bond is sleepy. | contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Katrina is medical. | contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | John is not happy. | self_contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Stewart is willing. | neutral |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Stewart is medical. | contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | John is sleepy. | self_contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Katrina is not medical. | entailment |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | John is not sleepy. | self_contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Stewart is not willing. | neutral |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Bond is not sleepy. | entailment |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Katrina is healthy. | neutral |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Crispin is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | John is not lively. | entailment |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | John is medical. | neutral |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Stewart is happy. | contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Crispin is happy. | entailment |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | Barclay is not happy. | contradiction |
John is not lively.
Stewart is not medical.
Stewart is not happy.
Crispin is healthy.
Crispin is not sleepy.
Crispin is not willing.
Barclay is healthy.
Bond is not sleepy.
John is not sleepy.
Kayla is medical.
Kayla is not sleepy.
Bond is lively.If someone is sleepy and not healthy, then he is not willing, and vice versa.
Someone who is both lively and healthy is always not sleepy.
Someone is happy if and only if he is not willing.
It can be concluded that Katrina is happy once knowing that Crispin is willing or Kayla is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Barclay is not lively once knowing that John is willing.
If there is at least one people who is both lively and not healthy, then John is medical.
Kayla being medical and Crispin being happy are equivalent to Katrina being lively and Barclay being not willing.
If there is someone who is happy, then Crispin is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both not healthy and medical, then Stewart is lively and Crispin is not sleepy.
If someone is not lively, then he is both not happy and not willing.
If Stewart is lively, then John is willing and Stewart is not happy.
Crispin being happy is equivalent to Katrina being not medical. | John is happy. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Lauren is not sad. | contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Mila is not blue. | neutral |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Lauren is blue. | neutral |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Martin is sad. | contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Lauren is dangerous. | contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Martin is blue. | neutral |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Kiefer is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Kiefer is not sad. | contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Martin is not sad. | entailment |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Hector is blue. | neutral |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Jason is global. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Kiefer is sad. | entailment |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Jason is ancient. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Jason is not ancient. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Jason is not global. | self_contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Hector is not ancient. | entailment |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Lauren is not dangerous. | entailment |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Mila is not ancient. | contradiction |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Mila is blue. | neutral |
Mila is ancient.
Jason is not sad.
Hector is funny.
Martin is ancient.
Lauren is not dangerous.
Mila is not sad.
Lester is dangerous.
Martin is not sad.
Martin is dangerous.
Kiefer is not global.
Jason is not blue.
Kiefer is blue.If Hector is not blue, then Martin is not ancient.
If there is someone who is either not blue or not global, then Lauren is sad.
Someone who is eithor sad or not funny is always global.
If there is at least one people who is ancient, then Kiefer is not blue and Mila is not dangerous.
If someone is not funny and not global, then he is not blue, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is not global, then Hector is not ancient, and vice versa.
If Martin is funny, then Jason is ancient.
If someone is sad and ancient, then he is both not funny and dangerous, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor blue or not funny is always dangerous.
Someone who is blue is always both not dangerous and funny.
If there is someone who is global, then Jason is not ancient and Jason is funny.
Someone is not global and funny if and only if he is not blue and not ancient. | Lauren is sad. | entailment |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Raymond is not innocent. | contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Quinlan is not innocent. | neutral |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Ricardo is not victorious. | self_contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Ricardo is blue. | self_contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Greyson is not combative. | self_contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Kathryn is innocent. | neutral |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Kathryn is not innocent. | neutral |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Ricardo is not blue. | self_contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Guy is innocent. | neutral |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Guy is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Greyson is blue. | entailment |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Raymond is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Guy is victorious. | entailment |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Guy is combative. | entailment |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Greyson is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Greyson is global. | contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Raymond is not blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Greyson is combative. | self_contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Raymond is global. | contradiction |
Ricardo is not victorious.
Greyson is innocent.
Quinlan is not blue.
Raymond is innocent.
Ricardo is not blue.
Guy is combative.
Raymond is victorious.
Sterling is not combative.
Greyson is combative.
Raymond is blue-eyed.
Ricardo is innocent.
Raymond is not combative.If someone is global or innocent, then he is not combative.
If there is someone who is both global and combative, then Raymond is victorious.
As long as someone is either combative or blue, he is blue-eyed and victorious.
If someone who is not global is also innocent, then he is victorious.
Someone who is not innocent is always blue.
If someone is both not victorious and not blue-eyed, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Guy is combative once knowing that Guy is not innocent.
If all people are not blue, then Sterling is not victorious and Guy is blue-eyed.
Someone being both not combative and victorious is equivalent to being not global and blue.
If there is at least one people who is not victorious, then Ricardo is blue and Kathryn is global.
Sterling being not victorious is equivalent to Kathryn being not blue and Raymond being blue-eyed.
If there is at least one people who is both not combative and innocent, then Kathryn is not blue. | Guy is not global. | neutral |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Robert is not motionless. | contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Robert is cold. | entailment |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Truman is cold. | self_contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Kiefer is imaginative. | neutral |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Truman is not motionless. | contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Kiefer is not cold. | self_contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Robert is not tense. | contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Gabriel is not tense. | neutral |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Kiefer is automatic. | contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Chatwin is not imaginative. | contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Truman is not imaginative. | entailment |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Randolph is automatic. | neutral |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Chatwin is better. | neutral |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Kiefer is cold. | self_contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Truman is not better. | self_contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Truman is not cold. | self_contradiction |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Robert is motionless. | entailment |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Kiefer is not automatic. | entailment |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Olin is not better. | neutral |
Olin is automatic.
Randolph is not cold.
Kiefer is not automatic.
Kiefer is not cold.
Robert is motionless.
Truman is not imaginative.
Truman is not automatic.
Truman is not better.
Chatwin is not tense.
Gabriel is better.
Chatwin is not motionless.
Olin is not tense.If Randolph is better or Chatwin is not automatic, then Kiefer is tense.
If someone is not better, then he is not cold, and vice versa.
If Kiefer is motionless, then Truman is not tense, and vice versa.
If someone is not motionless or not automatic, then he is tense.
All not imaginative people are better.
If someone is not motionless, then he is imaginative.
It can be concluded that Kiefer is cold once knowing that Gabriel is automatic or Gabriel is not imaginative.
If Robert is automatic, then Gabriel is not motionless.
If someone is both tense and not automatic, then he is cold.
If Robert is not motionless and Chatwin is not better, then Chatwin is cold and Chatwin is automatic.
Someone being motionless is equivalent to being not automatic.
Randolph is not imaginative and Gabriel is tense if and only if Randolph is not better and Chatwin is motionless. | Truman is motionless. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.