premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Alexander is not thoughtful. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Vicki is handsome. | entailment |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Avery is not obedient. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Alexander is accurate. | neutral |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Hubert is not dangerous. | entailment |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Avery is depressed. | neutral |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Hubert is not obedient. | entailment |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Vicki is not handsome. | contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Bruce is depressed. | contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Vicki is thoughtful. | neutral |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Bruce is thoughtful. | neutral |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Avery is not handsome. | entailment |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Alexander is not dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Bruce is accurate. | contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Hubert is not handsome. | entailment |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Griswald is dangerous. | contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Sherwin is not handsome. | neutral |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Avery is not thoughtful. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Bruce is not handsome. | contradiction |
Bruce is not depressed.
Alexander is not handsome.
Hubert is not thoughtful.
Hubert is not obedient.
Avery is not handsome.
Sherwin is not accurate.
Bruce is handsome.
Alexander is not thoughtful.
Vicki is handsome.
Alexander is dangerous.
Griswald is not obedient.
Griswald is not thoughtful.Someone who is eithor not obedient or dangerous is always thoughtful.
Griswald being not depressed or Bruce being thoughtful implies that Alexander is not dangerous.
If someone is not thoughtful, then he is both not dangerous and not obedient.
Vicki being handsome implies that Bruce is not accurate and Hubert is not obedient.
If someone is handsome, then he is not accurate.
Alexander being not dangerous and Bruce being obedient are equivalent to Alexander being depressed and Bruce being thoughtful.
Vicki being accurate and Vicki being thoughtful imply that Bruce is not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not thoughtful, then Vicki is handsome.
If Alexander is handsome, then Vicki is not thoughtful.
If Hubert is not thoughtful, then Avery is not dangerous and Avery is obedient, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not obedient, then Sherwin is not dangerous and Hubert is not handsome.
Someone being both not thoughtful and not accurate is equivalent to being obedient. | Griswald is thoughtful. | self_contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Lane is not black. | contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Lane is better. | entailment |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Danna is open. | self_contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Lane is not better. | contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Hector is severe. | contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Janet is not naughty. | neutral |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Janet is not black. | entailment |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Janet is not political. | neutral |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Janet is not severe. | neutral |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Hector is not open. | entailment |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Danna is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Hector is not severe. | entailment |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Hector is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Hector is better. | entailment |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Roy is open. | neutral |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Crispin is severe. | neutral |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Hector is not political. | self_contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Hector is political. | self_contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Crispin is not black. | contradiction |
Danna is not black.
Hector is not severe.
Lane is black.
Janet is not black.
Hector is not political.
Lane is not open.
Hector is naughty.
Crispin is not open.
Danna is severe.
Danna is not political.
Lane is naughty.
Hector is black.Someone is not open if and only if he is not naughty.
If someone is severe and open, then he is both political and not black, and vice versa.
If everyone is severe, then Danna is not black.
Hector being not better and Lane being open imply that Roy is not black and Janet is severe.
If someone is either black or severe, then he is not open and better.
Someone is black and naughty if and only if he is political.
Alice being better implies that Lane is severe and Lane is naughty.
If someone is both not black and better, then he is open.
If Roy is better and Roy is black, then Danna is severe.
Someone who is eithor not political or not naughty is always black.
Alice being open and Hector being not black imply that Roy is not better.
Alice being not better is equivalent to Hector being not black and Lane being not political. | Lane is open. | contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Carlos is not cloudy. | self_contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Hunter is not administrative. | contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Hunter is not cloudy. | self_contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Basil is not bright. | neutral |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Basil is existing. | neutral |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Laurence is not cloudy. | neutral |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Hunter is helpless. | entailment |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Laurence is not bright. | neutral |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Ross is not administrative. | contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Ethan is compassionate. | entailment |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Carlos is existing. | self_contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Carlos is helpless. | self_contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Ross is not existing. | contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Carlos is not helpless. | self_contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Basil is administrative. | entailment |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Ethan is not cloudy. | entailment |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Ethan is bright. | contradiction |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Scott is not compassionate. | neutral |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Ethan is administrative. | entailment |
Ross is existing.
Hunter is not compassionate.
Carlos is not existing.
Ethan is not bright.
Carlos is not helpless.
Basil is administrative.
Ethan is helpless.
Ethan is administrative.
Hunter is bright.
Ross is administrative.
Basil is cloudy.
Carlos is cloudy.As long as someone is bright, he is not cloudy and existing.
Scott is bright if and only if Ross is compassionate.
Someone who is not bright is always helpless.
Someone being both compassionate and cloudy is equivalent to being bright.
Ross is existing if and only if Carlos is not bright and Carlos is helpless.
Someone who is not existing is always both not compassionate and cloudy.
Scott being existing implies that Carlos is compassionate.
If someone is administrative and helpless, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If someone is both not compassionate and not cloudy, then he is existing.
If there is at least one people who is not compassionate, then Carlos is not cloudy and Hunter is administrative.
If someone is not bright, then he is compassionate.
All cloudy people are administrative. | Carlos is not administrative. | contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Odessa is not weary. | entailment |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Odessa is bad. | neutral |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Mark is bad. | entailment |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Stella is not solid. | neutral |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Uriah is weary. | neutral |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Mark is logical. | contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Odessa is not bad. | neutral |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Carroll is troubled. | entailment |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Uriah is logical. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Mark is solid. | contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Uriah is not troubled. | contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Stella is troubled. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Mark is not weary. | entailment |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Uriah is not bad. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Mark is not logical. | entailment |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Mark is troubled. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Stella is weary. | neutral |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Uriah is not logical. | self_contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Odessa is weary. | contradiction |
Uriah is logical.
Stella is not troubled.
Odessa is not weary.
Carroll is logical.
Stella is bad.
Mark is not teeny.
Uriah is bad.
Braden is weary.
Braden is teeny.
Carroll is not weary.
Michael is not bad.
Odessa is teeny.Someone being bad is equivalent to being troubled.
Someone being both troubled and teeny is equivalent to being logical.
As long as someone is not teeny, he is not logical and not weary.
If Mark is not weary and Carroll is not bad, then Michael is teeny.
Michael being not solid implies that Carroll is not weary and Stella is not logical.
If there is at least one people who is not weary, then Mark is not troubled and Uriah is not bad.
Braden being not bad is equivalent to Uriah being not solid.
Someone is not logical and not teeny if and only if he is not solid and troubled.
If there is someone who is both not logical and solid, then Uriah is not troubled.
If there is someone who is either logical or bad, then Carroll is troubled.
All not bad people are not logical.
If Michael is not troubled, then Carroll is not weary, and vice versa. | Michael is troubled. | contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Martin is not expensive. | self_contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Albert is sane. | neutral |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Martin is automatic. | neutral |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Albert is not sane. | neutral |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Caldwell is not disgusted. | neutral |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Albert is not automatic. | contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Martin is sweet. | contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Brock is placid. | entailment |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Brock is not automatic. | entailment |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Caldwell is sweet. | contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Martin is not placid. | entailment |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Martin is not disgusted. | self_contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Alberto is not sane. | self_contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Alberto is automatic. | entailment |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Martin is not sweet. | entailment |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Maribel is placid. | neutral |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Alberto is disgusted. | contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Martin is expensive. | self_contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Martin is sane. | contradiction |
Brock is not automatic.
Martin is not sane.
Albert is disgusted.
Martin is not sweet.
Albert is automatic.
Alberto is not placid.
Caldwell is placid.
Albert is not sweet.
Alberto is sane.
Caldwell is not sweet.
Alberto is not sweet.
Brock is placid.If there is at least one people who is both sane and automatic, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is at least one people who is either automatic or not placid, then Morris is not sweet and Martin is disgusted.
Martin being not expensive and Martin being not sane imply that Morris is not sweet.
Someone who is eithor sweet or not sane is always expensive.
Someone who is eithor not automatic or not sane is always not disgusted.
If there is at least one people who is both not disgusted and not sweet, then Maribel is expensive.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Caldwell is placid.
If someone is either not sane or automatic, then he is not disgusted and not expensive.
If Maribel is sane or Caldwell is automatic, then Caldwell is not expensive.
If someone is not expensive and not sane, then he is not placid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not sane, then Alberto is not expensive and Maribel is not sweet.
If someone is automatic and placid, then he is sane, and vice versa. | Alberto is expensive. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.