premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Kim is important. | neutral |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Kim is not cool. | contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Sheridan is latter. | self_contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Coleman is not cool. | self_contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Kim is not important. | neutral |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Kim is depressed. | contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Sheridan is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Gilbert is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Sheridan is not attractive. | entailment |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Gilbert is not cool. | entailment |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Kim is not attractive. | neutral |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Royce is not important. | neutral |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Gilbert is global. | contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Gresham is not global. | entailment |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Coleman is cool. | self_contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Gresham is global. | contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Royce is not attractive. | contradiction |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Royce is not latter. | entailment |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Kim is not global. | neutral |
Gresham is depressed.
Royce is not latter.
Gilbert is not global.
Kim is not depressed.
Kim is latter.
Coleman is cool.
Sheridan is not cool.
Gilbert is not cool.
Kim is cool.
Gresham is attractive.
Royce is not global.
Sheridan is not global.Coleman is cool if and only if Royce is not depressed and Gresham is not latter.
All depressed people are important.
If Royce is not latter, then Coleman is not cool.
Sheridan being important implies that Sheridan is latter.
Someone who is not attractive is always not depressed.
It can be concluded that Angus is depressed once knowing that Coleman is not attractive or Coleman is not latter.
Someone being not global is equivalent to being not latter.
If someone is both not global and not important, then he is not attractive.
Someone is not attractive and latter if and only if he is not cool.
If Sheridan is depressed, then Angus is important.
If there is someone who is both depressed and latter, then Royce is attractive.
Angus being not depressed implies that Royce is not important and Gilbert is latter. | Sheridan is not global. | entailment |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Tony is outstanding. | neutral |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Grayson is not sweet. | entailment |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Tony is severe. | entailment |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Tony is not severe. | contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Theodore is sweet. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Harris is massive. | contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Harris is not severe. | contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Theodore is not sweet. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Harris is not exciting. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Tobias is massive. | entailment |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Tobias is not various. | entailment |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Theodore is not massive. | entailment |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Tobias is not massive. | contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Marvin is not severe. | neutral |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Harris is not outstanding. | neutral |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Grayson is exciting. | neutral |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Tony is exciting. | self_contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Titus is massive. | neutral |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Harris is sweet. | contradiction |
Tobias is sweet.
Tony is severe.
Tobias is massive.
Harris is severe.
Theodore is severe.
Harris is exciting.
Marvin is not massive.
Tony is not massive.
Grayson is not sweet.
Tobias is not outstanding.
Tony is not sweet.
Grayson is not massive.If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Theodore is sweet and Harris is not massive.
It can be concluded that Tony is exciting once knowing that Grayson is not severe or Tobias is not outstanding.
As long as someone is severe, he is not exciting and not massive.
If there is at least one people who is exciting, then Harris is not various and Tobias is not outstanding.
Grayson being not severe is equivalent to Marvin being sweet and Tobias being not massive.
If there is someone who is either not various or exciting, then Grayson is massive.
Harris being not massive is equivalent to Harris being various and Tony being not exciting.
It can be concluded that Titus is not various once knowing that Marvin is not severe or Marvin is massive.
If someone is not massive or not various, then he is not sweet.
If Tobias is massive, then Tobias is not various.
Someone who is both not exciting and not sweet is always not massive.
It can be concluded that Grayson is not various and Theodore is not exciting once knowing that Tobias is not sweet. | Harris is various. | self_contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Hanna is not hard-working. | entailment |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Basil is not additional. | entailment |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Joe is not unhappy. | entailment |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Joe is sufficient. | self_contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Hardy is not practical. | entailment |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Joe is not sufficient. | self_contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Burton is not practical. | neutral |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Kingston is unhappy. | self_contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Kingston is hard-working. | entailment |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Hanna is not unhappy. | contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Chandler is sufficient. | contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Joe is not practical. | neutral |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Burton is not sufficient. | neutral |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Kingston is not additional. | self_contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Hanna is not practical. | neutral |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Hanna is hard-working. | contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Kingston is not hard-working. | contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Kingston is not unhappy. | self_contradiction |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Chandler is unhappy. | neutral |
Basil is inquisitive.
Hanna is not hard-working.
Chandler is additional.
Hanna is additional.
Kingston is hard-working.
Chandler is inquisitive.
Joe is not unhappy.
Kingston is unhappy.
Joe is not sufficient.
Hanna is unhappy.
Basil is not additional.
Kingston is not sufficient.If there is someone who is both not sufficient and practical, then Kingston is not unhappy and Hardy is not additional.
If someone is practical, then he is both not inquisitive and not unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is not sufficient or not practical, then Chandler is inquisitive.
Someone being not sufficient is equivalent to being additional.
Basil being not additional implies that Hardy is not practical and Hardy is hard-working.
Someone is not additional and hard-working if and only if he is not unhappy and practical.
Kingston being not hard-working is equivalent to Basil being not inquisitive.
Joe being not unhappy is equivalent to Joe being sufficient and Hardy being hard-working.
Chandler being not practical implies that Kingston is not inquisitive.
If Kingston is not sufficient, then Burton is not inquisitive.
Hanna is not sufficient and Hardy is not unhappy if and only if Hardy is not practical and Kingston is not additional.
Joe is not sufficient if and only if Basil is not unhappy and Kingston is practical. | Joe is not additional. | contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Kurt is not compassionate. | contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Stuart is expensive. | neutral |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Lee is breakable. | contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Casper is not compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Kurt is not happy. | entailment |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Casper is not beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Miranda is not breakable. | contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Casper is compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Miranda is beautiful. | neutral |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Ramsey is beautiful. | contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Lee is not compassionate. | neutral |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Ramsey is compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Lee is beautiful. | neutral |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Miranda is breakable. | entailment |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Miranda is not happy. | entailment |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Kurt is not expensive. | entailment |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Ramsey is not compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Theobold is not happy. | neutral |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Ramsey is not expensive. | contradiction |
Stuart is happy.
Kurt is compassionate.
Casper is not beautiful.
Miranda is expensive.
Lee is not breakable.
Kurt is modern.
Miranda is breakable.
Ramsey is not modern.
Miranda is not modern.
Lee is expensive.
Kurt is not expensive.
Ramsey is not beautiful.All not beautiful people are not compassionate.
All not beautiful people are compassionate.
Kurt being breakable implies that Stuart is beautiful and Stuart is happy.
It can be concluded that Stuart is compassionate once knowing that Theobold is not breakable or Theobold is happy.
Miranda is not happy if and only if Miranda is not compassionate.
If there is someone who is breakable, then Casper is beautiful and Ramsey is happy.
It can be concluded that Ramsey is breakable once knowing that Lee is not expensive.
If someone is expensive and not compassionate, then he is not modern, and vice versa.
Someone is breakable and not compassionate if and only if he is not happy and expensive.
If there is at least one people who is not beautiful, then Lee is happy.
Someone is beautiful and not happy if and only if he is not expensive.
It can be concluded that Stuart is happy once knowing that Ramsey is not beautiful or Ramsey is not modern. | Stuart is happy. | entailment |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Sophie is clear. | neutral |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kianna is not foolish. | self_contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Guy is not adorable. | self_contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Guy is not foolish. | entailment |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kimberly is fair-minded. | neutral |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Sophie is adorable. | self_contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Quillan is not fair-minded. | neutral |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kimberly is foolish. | contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Sophie is not clear. | neutral |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kimberly is not foolish. | entailment |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kimberly is not hilarious. | entailment |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kianna is not adorable. | self_contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Sophie is fair-minded. | contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kianna is foolish. | self_contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Quillan is clear. | contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Quillan is adorable. | neutral |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kianna is famous. | contradiction |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kimberly is not famous. | entailment |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Kianna is not fair-minded. | entailment |
Clark is fair-minded.
Sophie is adorable.
Sophie is not fair-minded.
Quillan is not clear.
Kianna is adorable.
Kianna is foolish.
Kimberly is not hilarious.
Guy is famous.
Kianna is not fair-minded.
Sophie is not foolish.
Sophie is not hilarious.
Kilian is not clear.Someone being not foolish is equivalent to being adorable.
It can be concluded that Clark is not clear once knowing that Quillan is fair-minded and Clark is not adorable.
If Kianna is clear, then Guy is foolish and Kimberly is famous.
It can be concluded that Kimberly is foolish once knowing that Kilian is famous.
It can be concluded that Kilian is hilarious and Kianna is fair-minded once knowing that Sophie is not clear and Kilian is not foolish.
If someone is famous or not hilarious, then he is not adorable.
Someone is not famous and not foolish if and only if he is not adorable.
If Quillan is famous, then Sophie is foolish and Kilian is fair-minded, and vice versa.
If someone is not foolish or not fair-minded, then he is not adorable.
If there is at least one people who is both not clear and not fair-minded, then Guy is hilarious.
If someone is not hilarious or clear, then he is not famous.
If all people are not clear, then Guy is fair-minded. | Clark is not fair-minded. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.