premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Barclay is terrible. | entailment |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Kerwin is not terrible. | self_contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Jonathan is thoughtful. | self_contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Miranda is not terrible. | neutral |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Kerwin is terrible. | self_contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Kerwin is thoughtful. | self_contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Miranda is not thoughtful. | contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Kerwin is shiny. | entailment |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Gilroy is not thoughtful. | neutral |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Gilroy is not massive. | neutral |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Kerwin is not purple. | entailment |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Jonathan is not purple. | contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Jonathan is purple. | entailment |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Barclay is massive. | contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Jonathan is not terrible. | entailment |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Miranda is terrible. | neutral |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Jonathan is terrible. | contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Kerwin is not thoughtful. | self_contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Barclay is not terrible. | contradiction |
Jonathan is not terrible.
Barclay is shiny.
Jonathan is thoughtful.
Miranda is thoughtful.
Kerwin is not purple.
Dave is not thoughtful.
Kerwin is not terrible.
Miranda is massive.
Kerwin is thoughtful.
Jonathan is purple.
Alfie is not terrible.
Barclay is terrible.It can be concluded that Kerwin is not terrible once knowing that Jonathan is not thoughtful.
Miranda being not thoughtful is equivalent to Gilroy being mental and Dave being shiny.
If Kerwin is thoughtful or Gilroy is not shiny, then Kerwin is terrible.
If Dave is mental, then Miranda is purple and Jonathan is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Jonathan is not purple once knowing that Alfie is not mental.
Someone being not terrible is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
Someone is terrible and shiny if and only if he is not massive.
Someone is not purple and shiny if and only if he is thoughtful and terrible.
If there is someone who is both mental and massive, then Miranda is not purple.
If Miranda is not terrible, then Gilroy is thoughtful and Gilroy is massive.
Alfie is thoughtful and Dave is not massive if and only if Kerwin is purple and Alfie is not mental.
Dave being not purple and Gilroy being not mental imply that Gilroy is not shiny. | Gilroy is not mental. | neutral |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Morris is not neat. | neutral |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Hubert is right. | neutral |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Henry is cotton. | entailment |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Henry is embarrassed. | entailment |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Igor is not neat. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Hanna is not cotton. | contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Alberto is embarrassed. | entailment |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Alberto is tough. | contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Alberto is not tame. | contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Alberto is cotton. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Igor is right. | neutral |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Morris is tame. | entailment |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Henry is not right. | neutral |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Morris is not tame. | contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Henry is tough. | contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Igor is not tame. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Henry is not tame. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Hanna is tame. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Hubert is tame. | neutral |
Hanna is not tame.
Morris is embarrassed.
Henry is not tough.
Hanna is not embarrassed.
Kayla is not embarrassed.
Igor is not neat.
Hanna is neat.
Hanna is tough.
Alberto is right.
Henry is tame.
Igor is not tame.
Alberto is not cotton.Henry being tough and Igor being neat imply that Hanna is not cotton.
If everyone is embarrassed or tame, then Hubert is not tough.
If Alberto is not tough, then Igor is not embarrassed and Henry is not tame, and vice versa.
Someone being both cotton and tame is equivalent to being embarrassed.
All neat people are not tough.
Someone who is not cotton or not tame is always embarrassed and neat.
Alberto being not embarrassed or Morris being tough implies that Kayla is not tame.
Hanna being not cotton and Henry being embarrassed are equivalent to Hubert being not neat and Igor being not tame.
It can be concluded that Hanna is embarrassed and Henry is cotton once knowing that Hanna is tough.
Morris being not neat and Morris being tame imply that Hanna is not cotton and Hubert is tough.
If Kayla is tough or Alberto is not embarrassed, then Alberto is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is either not cotton or not embarrassed, then Alberto is right and Igor is tame. | Alberto is neat. | entailment |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Jesse is not administrative. | neutral |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Cadman is not administrative. | contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Abraham is not tame. | neutral |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Jesse is smart. | entailment |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Abraham is not bright. | entailment |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Abraham is smart. | entailment |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Stanley is administrative. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Cadman is shallow. | neutral |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Jesse is tame. | neutral |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Jesse is not swift. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Arlen is not administrative. | contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Jesse is not bright. | entailment |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Jesse is swift. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Abraham is bright. | contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Stanley is shallow. | contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Jesse is not tame. | neutral |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Anabelle is smart. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Jesse is not shallow. | entailment |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Anabelle is tame. | self_contradiction |
Anabelle is tame.
Arlen is not shallow.
Abraham is swift.
Anabelle is swift.
Anabelle is not smart.
Arlen is not smart.
Cadman is administrative.
Jesse is not swift.
Abraham is not bright.
Abraham is administrative.
Stanley is administrative.
Stanley is bright.Someone being both not tame and smart is equivalent to being shallow and not administrative.
Someone who is eithor bright or not tame is always not administrative.
Someone is swift if and only if he is smart.
As long as someone is either not smart or not swift, he is not shallow and not bright.
It can be concluded that Stanley is not shallow once knowing that Cadman is not smart and Stanley is not administrative.
If there is someone who is not swift, then Anabelle is not tame and Stanley is not smart.
If there is at least one people who is tame or not administrative, then Bryant is not shallow.
Arlen being not swift is equivalent to Stanley being not tame.
If there is someone who is not smart, then Anabelle is tame and Anabelle is swift.
If there is at least one people who is swift, then Arlen is administrative and Stanley is not tame.
If Jesse is smart, then Anabelle is not shallow and Arlen is administrative, and vice versa.
If there is nobody who is not not swift, then Abraham is shallow and Cadman is bright. | Bryant is shallow. | contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Arthur is not boring. | contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Harlan is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Gideon is boring. | neutral |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Aldis is distracted. | contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Arthur is not odd. | neutral |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Arthur is boring. | entailment |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Garrick is not hurt. | entailment |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Aldis is not distracted. | entailment |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Gideon is mellow. | neutral |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Hubert is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Garrick is hurt. | contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Gloria is mellow. | neutral |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Harlan is mellow. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Hubert is mellow. | self_contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Harlan is not hurt. | entailment |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Harlan is boring. | neutral |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Harlan is hurt. | contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Gideon is not hurt. | entailment |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Garrick is mellow. | contradiction |
Harlan is not mellow.
Gideon is reserved.
Garrick is not mellow.
Arthur is not distracted.
Hubert is not mellow.
Aldis is not distracted.
Hubert is distracted.
Arthur is boring.
Gloria is not distracted.
Gideon is not hurt.
Garrick is not hurt.
Harlan is reserved.Harlan being distracted is equivalent to Gideon being reserved.
Someone who is eithor distracted or not reserved is always mellow.
It can be concluded that Arthur is mellow once knowing that Aldis is odd or Arthur is not hurt.
If Harlan is reserved and Hubert is mellow, then Arthur is not distracted.
Someone is not hurt and not odd if and only if he is distracted.
If Garrick is not boring, then Gloria is odd and Gloria is not mellow.
Aldis being not hurt or Hubert being not mellow implies that Hubert is odd.
If there is at least one people who is distracted or not odd, then Gloria is reserved.
Someone who is not mellow is always both reserved and odd.
If there is at least one people who is boring, then Harlan is not reserved.
If Arthur is not odd, then Aldis is hurt and Gloria is not reserved, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or reserved, then Aldis is not mellow. | Hubert is odd. | self_contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Bevis is open. | contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Andrew is not aware. | contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Andrew is not obedient. | self_contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Connell is obedient. | neutral |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Isaiah is not open. | entailment |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Connell is unhappy. | contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Andrew is not green. | self_contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Connell is aware. | neutral |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Carl is green. | contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Andrew is open. | self_contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Carl is not green. | entailment |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Carl is unhappy. | self_contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Carl is lively. | entailment |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Morris is unhappy. | contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Isaiah is lively. | neutral |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Morris is aware. | neutral |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Isaiah is green. | entailment |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Bevis is not aware. | neutral |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Andrew is not open. | self_contradiction |
Isaiah is aware.
Andrew is not unhappy.
Isaiah is not open.
Carl is unhappy.
Andrew is open.
Connell is not unhappy.
Andrew is green.
Morris is obedient.
Carl is lively.
Bevis is not open.
Andrew is aware.
Morris is not green.If someone is not obedient and not open, then he is both unhappy and aware, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not obedient or not aware is always not unhappy.
It can be concluded that Ives is not lively once knowing that Isaiah is not aware.
Someone being not green is equivalent to being not unhappy.
Someone is not obedient and green if and only if he is not open and unhappy.
If someone is obedient and not aware, then he is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is aware, then he is green.
If Morris is aware, then Isaiah is not lively, and vice versa.
If someone is either lively or open, then he is not unhappy and obedient.
If everyone is unhappy or aware, then Carl is not lively.
Someone being both open and not green is equivalent to being lively and not obedient.
If there is at least one people who is not aware, then Ives is not unhappy. | Morris is not unhappy. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.