premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Hadden is not relevant. | self_contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Kingsley is not automatic. | self_contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Kingsley is automatic. | self_contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Laurence is not determined. | neutral |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Trent is not big. | contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Hadden is determined. | entailment |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Trent is big. | entailment |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Kingsley is relevant. | self_contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Alton is not big. | neutral |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Trent is nervous. | contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Trent is not determined. | self_contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Alton is not relevant. | neutral |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Abner is not nervous. | entailment |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Laurence is not big. | neutral |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Kingsley is big. | entailment |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Trent is not cotton. | contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Alton is not determined. | neutral |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Trent is automatic. | contradiction |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Hadden is cotton. | entailment |
Abner is not determined.
Abner is cotton.
Alton is not cotton.
Hadden is big.
Abner is not relevant.
Kingsley is automatic.
Trent is not determined.
Hadden is determined.
Alton is not nervous.
Abner is not nervous.
Trent is big.
Sterling is not determined.Someone being nervous is equivalent to being not big.
Abner being relevant or Abner being not big implies that Trent is determined.
Someone who is eithor big or determined is always relevant.
If someone is not automatic, then he is big, and vice versa.
If someone is automatic or relevant, then he is big.
Someone is determined and cotton if and only if he is big.
If there is at least one people who is nervous or big, then Trent is not relevant.
It can be concluded that Hadden is cotton once knowing that Laurence is not relevant.
Someone is not relevant if and only if he is cotton.
If Alton is not automatic, then Hadden is big and Sterling is cotton, and vice versa.
If everyone is relevant, then Trent is not nervous and Hadden is big.
If someone is big, then he is not nervous. | Hadden is not cotton. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Austin is beautiful. | neutral |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Austin is remarkable. | neutral |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Lane is not various. | entailment |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Aidan is not various. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Aidan is various. | entailment |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Nicholas is not various. | entailment |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Henry is evil. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Henry is beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Aidan is beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Hamlin is timid. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Lane is beautiful. | neutral |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Nicholas is various. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Nicholas is not timid. | entailment |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Nicholas is evil. | contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Aidan is not useful. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Henry is remarkable. | neutral |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Aidan is useful. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Aidan is remarkable. | entailment |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Austin is not timid. | neutral |
Hamlin is not useful.
Nicholas is not various.
Aidan is not beautiful.
Lane is not various.
Aidan is timid.
Nicholas is not useful.
Henry is not evil.
Henry is useful.
Nicholas is not evil.
Nicholas is not timid.
Kelsey is useful.
Hamlin is evil.Austin being not evil implies that Hamlin is not useful.
If Kelsey is remarkable, then Austin is evil and Aidan is useful, and vice versa.
Someone who is timid is always both various and evil.
It can be concluded that Kelsey is evil and Hamlin is not useful once knowing that Nicholas is various.
If someone is various or remarkable, then he is not useful.
Someone who is both evil and remarkable is always beautiful.
If someone is various and not evil, then he is timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not remarkable or not various is always not evil.
If someone is evil, then he is both useful and timid.
Nicholas being not useful implies that Hamlin is not timid and Henry is beautiful.
If there is someone who is either not evil or not various, then Henry is not beautiful.
Someone being both timid and useful is equivalent to being remarkable. | Hamlin is not remarkable. | contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Benton is impossible. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Bryant is not impossible. | contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Cuthbert is not attentive. | entailment |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Martin is long. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Lauren is not funny. | neutral |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Bryant is not funny. | neutral |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Rachelle is long. | neutral |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Martin is not adorable. | contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Martin is not attentive. | entailment |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Cuthbert is not long. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Rachelle is not funny. | neutral |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Martin is not long. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Bryant is ugly. | contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Rachelle is not impossible. | contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Bryant is impossible. | entailment |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Cuthbert is not impossible. | entailment |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Rachelle is not ugly. | contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Rachelle is impossible. | entailment |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Benton is not impossible. | self_contradiction |
Lincoln is ugly.
Benton is impossible.
Cuthbert is ugly.
Cuthbert is long.
Bryant is not ugly.
Cuthbert is not funny.
Lincoln is not adorable.
Martin is not attentive.
Benton is not long.
Rachelle is ugly.
Lincoln is not attentive.
Benton is not ugly.Someone who is not attentive is always both adorable and not long.
Martin is long if and only if Lincoln is not attentive and Rachelle is ugly.
If Lauren is long, then Rachelle is not impossible.
If there is at least one people who is not ugly or long, then Bryant is impossible.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not adorable, then Rachelle is impossible.
If someone is adorable and not funny, then he is long, and vice versa.
If Lauren is not long and Cuthbert is funny, then Rachelle is adorable and Benton is not impossible, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either impossible or funny, then Lincoln is not attentive.
If Bryant is impossible, then Lincoln is funny, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Martin is not ugly.
Benton being not impossible is equivalent to Cuthbert being not attentive.
If someone is not impossible and adorable, then he is not long, and vice versa. | Lauren is impossible. | neutral |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Gilroy is victorious. | contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Gilroy is not handsome. | entailment |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Curtis is not brown. | neutral |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Colin is not handsome. | neutral |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Curtis is victorious. | neutral |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Murray is not angry. | contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Tracey is smart. | contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Murray is not victorious. | entailment |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Olin is not victorious. | entailment |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Gilroy is smart. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Murray is grumpy. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Colin is angry. | entailment |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Olin is not smart. | neutral |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Colin is brown. | neutral |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Gilroy is not angry. | contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Hadwin is not angry. | entailment |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Colin is grumpy. | contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Murray is not smart. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Murray is not grumpy. | self_contradiction |
Colin is not smart.
Colin is not grumpy.
Colin is angry.
Curtis is smart.
Olin is not victorious.
Gilroy is not grumpy.
Hadwin is not angry.
Gilroy is angry.
Gilroy is not handsome.
Murray is angry.
Murray is not handsome.
Tracey is not smart.Hadwin being grumpy and Hadwin being victorious imply that Curtis is not handsome.
Someone is not handsome and not victorious if and only if he is smart and grumpy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is victorious once knowing that Olin is not smart or Murray is angry.
If someone is grumpy or he is handsome, then he is smart.
If Murray is grumpy and Colin is not angry, then Curtis is smart.
If someone is both smart and not grumpy, then he is brown.
If there is someone who is not handsome, then Gilroy is not brown.
If someone who is brown is also handsome, then he is smart.
If someone is brown, then he is smart.
If there is someone who is either victorious or angry, then Tracey is not smart.
If someone who is not handsome is also angry, then he is not grumpy.
Someone is not smart and not victorious if and only if he is angry. | Gilroy is brown. | self_contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Clark is salty. | self_contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Roland is not excited. | entailment |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Quimby is not excited. | neutral |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Blanca is not generous. | neutral |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Clark is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Michael is lonely. | entailment |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Roland is political. | contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Casper is lonely. | contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Roland is not salty. | entailment |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Hadwin is excited. | neutral |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Hadwin is not friendly. | contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Quimby is generous. | entailment |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Blanca is not salty. | neutral |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Quimby is not generous. | contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Roland is not generous. | self_contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Blanca is friendly. | entailment |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Clark is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Roland is generous. | self_contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Clark is not political. | contradiction |
Clark is lonely.
Roland is lonely.
Casper is not lonely.
Blanca is not excited.
Roland is not salty.
Casper is friendly.
Michael is not salty.
Roland is not friendly.
Clark is political.
Hadwin is friendly.
Roland is not generous.
Quimby is not political.It can be concluded that Roland is not lonely and Casper is political once knowing that Michael is not generous.
If someone is not excited or he is political, then he is friendly.
As long as someone is not political, he is generous and friendly.
Someone who is lonely is always both not excited and not friendly.
Someone being not salty is equivalent to being lonely.
If Clark is not excited, then Clark is not generous and Casper is salty.
Roland being political or Quimby being not friendly implies that Hadwin is not lonely.
Someone who is both political and excited is always salty.
If Clark is excited, then Michael is friendly, and vice versa.
Michael is political if and only if Hadwin is not excited.
It can be concluded that Clark is not generous once knowing that Michael is friendly.
Michael is not salty if and only if Michael is not excited and Roland is not political. | Quimby is lonely. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.