premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Stuart is tender. | entailment |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Charles is tender. | contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Basil is not frightened. | contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Marion is not placid. | neutral |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Aubrey is not ugly. | neutral |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Charles is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Stuart is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Marion is strict. | contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Stuart is not strict. | entailment |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Basil is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Aubrey is ugly. | neutral |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Aubrey is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Marion is placid. | neutral |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Basil is friendly. | self_contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Bud is ugly. | neutral |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Basil is placid. | contradiction |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Basil is frightened. | entailment |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Bud is not friendly. | entailment |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Aubrey is frightened. | entailment |
Marion is not strict.
Charles is placid.
Basil is frightened.
Basil is tender.
Stuart is not placid.
Bud is not frightened.
Stuart is not friendly.
Charles is not tender.
Stuart is tender.
Basil is not strict.
Marion is ugly.
Aubrey is not placid.If Aubrey is ugly and Aubrey is frightened, then Sheridan is not tender.
If there is at least one people who is frightened or not placid, then Sheridan is tender.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugly and tender, then Stuart is strict.
Someone who is not placid is always both friendly and not strict.
Aubrey being not placid and Basil being ugly imply that Sheridan is not strict.
if there is at least one people who is not ugly and tender, then Sheridan is placid and Marion is not strict.
Someone who is both tender and not strict is always not ugly.
Someone who is not strict or placid is always frightened and not friendly.
If someone is not ugly, then he is not placid.
If there is at least one people who is both not tender and frightened, then Stuart is placid.
Someone is placid and frightened if and only if he is not ugly and not tender.
If Stuart is frightened, then Bud is not friendly and Charles is not strict, and vice versa. | Charles is ugly. | contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Thomas is not better. | neutral |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Lester is inner. | contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Lionel is red. | contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Lionel is not delightful. | contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Leslie is not inner. | neutral |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Blanche is not inner. | self_contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Lester is red. | entailment |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Thomas is delightful. | contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Blanche is not red. | self_contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Sherwin is not delightful. | contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Blanche is not sane. | neutral |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Leslie is not better. | entailment |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Blanche is red. | self_contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Sherwin is delightful. | entailment |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Lester is blue. | entailment |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Sherwin is not blue. | entailment |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Lionel is not blue. | self_contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Graham is better. | neutral |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Lionel is blue. | self_contradiction |
Blanche is better.
Thomas is not red.
Sherwin is not inner.
Sherwin is not better.
Lionel is better.
Leslie is not blue.
Blanche is red.
Lionel is sane.
Blanche is inner.
Thomas is not blue.
Blanche is not blue.
Leslie is not better.Graham being red is equivalent to Leslie being not delightful and Lionel being blue.
If someone is not inner or he is better, then he is delightful.
If someone is either sane or red, then he is blue and not inner.
if there is at least one people who is not blue and not red, then Lionel is not better and Thomas is not delightful.
If there is someone who is both not better and not delightful, then Lester is red.
If someone is not better, then he is not blue.
Thomas being sane or Thomas being delightful implies that Graham is not blue.
If someone is both red and sane, then he is not blue.
It can be concluded that Lester is not blue once knowing that Thomas is better and Graham is delightful.
If Lester is not inner, then Leslie is not sane.
If there is nobody who is not sane, then Lester is not better and Leslie is not blue.
If someone is not red and delightful, then he is better, and vice versa. | Lester is not sane. | neutral |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Leona is clever. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Hadden is not panicky. | entailment |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Hadden is brown. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Leona is not clever. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Cedric is panicky. | entailment |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Calvin is not elegant. | neutral |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Chad is elegant. | contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Nathalie is not elegant. | neutral |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Cedric is not panicky. | contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Lane is not sexual. | contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Lane is sexual. | entailment |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Leona is not sexual. | neutral |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Nathalie is panicky. | neutral |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Leona is not brown. | contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Hadden is panicky. | contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Lane is clever. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Leona is not panicky. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Lane is panicky. | entailment |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Hadden is not clever. | entailment |
Calvin is brown.
Cedric is panicky.
Chad is not elegant.
Lane is sexual.
Hadden is not panicky.
Calvin is not sexual.
Hadden is not brown.
Calvin is disturbed.
Lane is clever.
Hadden is not clever.
Nathalie is disturbed.
Cedric is not clever.Someone who is eithor brown or not disturbed is always not clever.
If someone is not panicky and disturbed, then he is not elegant and not brown.
Chad being panicky is equivalent to Leona being disturbed and Hadden being not elegant.
If there is someone who is clever, then Lane is not disturbed and Hadden is brown.
If there is at least one people who is clever, then Nathalie is sexual.
Someone who is not disturbed is always both panicky and clever.
If Nathalie is sexual, then Calvin is panicky, and vice versa.
Calvin being sexual implies that Calvin is disturbed.
It can be concluded that Leona is not panicky and Leona is not disturbed once knowing that Hadden is brown.
Someone who is both panicky and not disturbed is always brown.
If Chad is brown and Nathalie is not clever, then Lane is not sexual.
If Chad is clever, then Chad is disturbed, and vice versa. | Leona is elegant. | neutral |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Herbert is happy. | neutral |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Gale is not determined. | neutral |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Aiken is similar. | entailment |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Herbert is not depressed. | entailment |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Herbert is not similar. | neutral |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Aiken is not happy. | contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Aiken is encouraging. | contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Herbert is depressed. | contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Royce is not determined. | entailment |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Herbert is encouraging. | neutral |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Joe is determined. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Nicholas is depressed. | entailment |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Aiken is not depressed. | entailment |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Luna is determined. | contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Royce is encouraging. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Royce is basic. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Royce is determined. | contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Joe is similar. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Joe is not determined. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not happy.
Nicholas is depressed.
Royce is encouraging.
Joe is determined.
Nicholas is happy.
Joe is happy.
Royce is similar.
Aiken is happy.
Gale is basic.
Aiken is not depressed.
Herbert is not depressed.
Royce is basic.It can be concluded that Herbert is determined and Royce is happy once knowing that Nicholas is not encouraging.
Someone who is happy is always similar.
Someone who is both depressed and not encouraging is always determined.
If there is someone who is either basic or not depressed, then Luna is happy.
If there is someone who is both not encouraging and similar, then Herbert is determined.
Joe is happy if and only if Gale is not depressed and Nicholas is determined.
Nicholas being similar is equivalent to Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not encouraging.
If everyone is basic, then Joe is happy.
If there is someone who is depressed, then Joe is not similar and Aiken is not basic.
If someone is not basic and similar, then he is not determined, and vice versa.
If someone is not determined and not encouraging, then he is happy, and vice versa.
Nicholas being not basic and Luna being not similar are equivalent to Luna being happy and Luna being encouraging. | Herbert is not encouraging. | neutral |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Kimberly is vivacious. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Royce is not rainy. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Sherard is not uninterested. | entailment |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Sherard is uninterested. | contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Hadden is not vivacious. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Kingsley is not uninterested. | neutral |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Royce is rainy. | self_contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Kingsley is not rainy. | contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Claude is mental. | entailment |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Bond is mental. | contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Bond is uninterested. | neutral |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Claude is not small. | entailment |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Claude is small. | contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Bond is rainy. | contradiction |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Sherard is not odd. | entailment |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Bond is not mental. | entailment |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Kingsley is uninterested. | neutral |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Claude is rainy. | neutral |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Kimberly is small. | neutral |
Sherard is not odd.
Hadden is not uninterested.
Hadden is not vivacious.
Sherard is not uninterested.
Royce is uninterested.
Claude is mental.
Kingsley is rainy.
Bond is not vivacious.
Kimberly is vivacious.
Claude is not small.
Bond is not mental.
Royce is not rainy.If there is at least one people who is uninterested or not odd, then Bond is not rainy.
If there is someone who is both vivacious and not uninterested, then Kingsley is small and Bond is not odd.
Royce is vivacious if and only if Bond is not mental and Kingsley is rainy.
If someone is uninterested, then he is rainy.
If Claude is rainy or Kimberly is not uninterested, then Kingsley is not small.
If there is at least one people who is uninterested, then Hadden is vivacious.
Sherard being not mental is equivalent to Claude being small.
If Sherard is not uninterested or Kingsley is not mental, then Kimberly is not vivacious.
Bond being not mental and Royce being not odd imply that Kimberly is small and Kingsley is not rainy.
Royce being not small is equivalent to Bond being rainy and Bond being vivacious.
If there is someone who is either not rainy or not vivacious, then Claude is not small.
If someone is both odd and not small, then he is mental. | Hadden is vivacious. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.