premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Travis is accurate. | entailment |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Travis is fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Basil is blue. | entailment |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Basil is chestnut. | neutral |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Sidney is not chestnut. | neutral |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Travis is splendid. | contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Bowen is blue. | neutral |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Harmony is not fuzzy. | contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Crispin is splendid. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Travis is blue. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Sidney is steep. | contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Crispin is not splendid. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Sidney is not splendid. | neutral |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Travis is steep. | entailment |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Travis is not fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Bowen is splendid. | contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Basil is not accurate. | neutral |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Harmony is not steep. | contradiction |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Anabelle is accurate. | entailment |
Crispin is splendid.
Basil is blue.
Harmony is steep.
Travis is not splendid.
Travis is not blue.
Travis is not chestnut.
Bowen is not splendid.
Anabelle is not blue.
Bowen is steep.
Crispin is not blue.
Crispin is fuzzy.
Sidney is not steep.Someone who is not chestnut is always both blue and not splendid.
Anabelle is not accurate if and only if Bowen is blue and Basil is not chestnut.
Someone who is steep is always fuzzy.
As long as someone is not chestnut, he is not fuzzy and steep.
Anabelle being accurate is equivalent to Sidney being not steep.
Someone who is both not fuzzy and not splendid is always accurate.
If all people are accurate, then Sidney is not splendid.
If there is someone who is either not steep or not chestnut, then Travis is not blue.
If there is at least one people who is splendid, then Crispin is steep and Harmony is fuzzy.
Someone is fuzzy if and only if he is not splendid.
It can be concluded that Crispin is not chestnut once knowing that Basil is not splendid or Bowen is not steep.
It can be concluded that Harmony is fuzzy and Sidney is splendid once knowing that Travis is not steep. | Harmony is steep. | entailment |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Roy is tired. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Roy is not arrow. | entailment |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Carolina is aware. | neutral |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Colin is not used. | entailment |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Gideon is arrow. | contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Carolina is wrong. | entailment |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Carolina is tired. | neutral |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Gideon is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Pierce is aware. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Gideon is tired. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Roy is arrow. | contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Carolina is not wrong. | contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Pierce is arrow. | contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Bruce is not tired. | entailment |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Carolina is used. | neutral |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Carolina is not arrow. | neutral |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Bruce is not aware. | contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Carolina is wooden. | neutral |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Pierce is not aware. | self_contradiction |
Pierce is not aware.
Colin is not used.
Bruce is aware.
Gideon is used.
Gideon is not tired.
Roy is not arrow.
Colin is tired.
Bruce is wrong.
Gideon is not arrow.
Bruce is not tired.
Ambrose is not used.
Pierce is not used.If Pierce is not aware and Gideon is not used, then Pierce is arrow and Carolina is wooden.
If Roy is not wrong, then Colin is used.
Colin being not aware implies that Colin is not wooden and Pierce is not wrong.
Someone who is eithor used or not arrow is always tired.
If Carolina is wooden, then Roy is wrong.
If Roy is not arrow or Pierce is used, then Pierce is not wooden.
It can be concluded that Pierce is tired once knowing that Ambrose is arrow.
If Colin is tired, then Carolina is wrong and Ambrose is aware.
If there is someone who is wrong, then Gideon is used and Roy is not tired.
Someone is wooden and aware if and only if he is not used.
If someone is not used and aware, then he is both not wrong and not arrow, and vice versa.
Colin being not used is equivalent to Gideon being not tired and Gideon being not arrow. | Gideon is used. | entailment |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Collier is not bumpy. | contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Monique is not brown. | neutral |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | James is not odd. | self_contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | James is desperate. | self_contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Rory is not desperate. | self_contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | James is easy. | neutral |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Irvin is not easy. | neutral |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Alston is easy. | contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Irvin is not brown. | contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Kent is not bumpy. | entailment |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Kent is odd. | self_contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Irvin is brown. | entailment |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Alston is not brown. | contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Irvin is bumpy. | contradiction |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | James is not bumpy. | entailment |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Collier is not brown. | neutral |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Collier is easy. | neutral |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Irvin is not bumpy. | entailment |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Monique is not odd. | entailment |
James is not brown.
Rory is adventurous.
Alston is brown.
Rory is easy.
James is not bumpy.
Alston is not easy.
Alston is adventurous.
Irvin is brown.
Irvin is adventurous.
Kent is brown.
Irvin is desperate.
James is not adventurous.Someone who is eithor not adventurous or odd is always desperate.
Collier being not easy or Collier being not adventurous implies that Alston is not desperate.
James being adventurous or Irvin being brown implies that Alston is bumpy.
If Alston is not easy, then Collier is bumpy, and vice versa.
Someone is brown and not odd if and only if he is not bumpy.
If there is at least one people who is not brown or adventurous, then Monique is not odd.
Someone who is not brown is always both not adventurous and not desperate.
If there is someone who is both not desperate and easy, then Irvin is not odd and Collier is bumpy.
Someone being both odd and adventurous is equivalent to being not bumpy.
Rory being easy is equivalent to James being desperate and Rory being not brown.
Someone who is eithor not easy or brown is always not odd.
If there is someone who is either not brown or not adventurous, then Collier is not odd. | Rory is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Hubert is not cool. | entailment |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Kelvin is not polite. | contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Culbert is excited. | contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Hannah is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Grant is not realistic. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Kelvin is not friendly. | contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Hubert is polite. | neutral |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Shawn is friendly. | neutral |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Shawn is not realistic. | neutral |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Ryan is not cool. | entailment |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Kelvin is polite. | entailment |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Grant is relevant. | contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Hannah is cool. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Ryan is cool. | contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Culbert is cool. | neutral |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Ryan is realistic. | entailment |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Hubert is not relevant. | entailment |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Culbert is polite. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Grant is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Hannah is cool.
Culbert is relevant.
Culbert is not excited.
Hannah is friendly.
Grant is not realistic.
Culbert is polite.
Kelvin is not relevant.
Grant is friendly.
Grant is not polite.
Ryan is not excited.
Ryan is not cool.
Hannah is not relevant.Someone being realistic is equivalent to being not cool.
If someone is realistic, then he is both friendly and not relevant.
Someone being both friendly and realistic is equivalent to being not relevant.
If Hubert is cool, then Shawn is not excited.
Grant being polite or Hannah being excited implies that Ryan is not cool.
Ryan being not relevant implies that Hannah is not realistic and Kelvin is polite.
Grant being not excited and Hubert being not polite imply that Ryan is cool.
If there is someone who is both not friendly and not polite, then Ryan is not cool.
Someone being not excited is equivalent to being not polite.
Someone who is both friendly and not realistic is always not cool.
If there is someone who is excited, then Grant is not relevant and Ryan is not polite.
if there is at least one people who is not polite and not relevant, then Hubert is not cool and Hannah is realistic. | Culbert is not friendly. | neutral |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Silvia is not attractive. | neutral |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Amanda is not medical. | neutral |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Helena is entire. | neutral |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Helena is not attractive. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Henry is not medical. | contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Beverly is naughty. | contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Amanda is itchy. | neutral |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Helena is itchy. | entailment |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Silvia is not itchy. | neutral |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Henry is not itchy. | contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Helena is not steep. | entailment |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Beverly is itchy. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Helena is steep. | contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Henry is not attractive. | contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Henry is itchy. | entailment |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Henry is medical. | entailment |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Beverly is not itchy. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Beverly is not naughty. | entailment |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Helena is attractive. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is not itchy.
Beverly is not attractive.
Beverly is not steep.
Helena is itchy.
Orlando is not entire.
Beverly is not itchy.
Silvia is not naughty.
Helena is not steep.
Henry is attractive.
Beverly is medical.
Joshua is steep.
Silvia is not entire.Helena being entire and Helena being not itchy imply that Joshua is steep.
If Orlando is not entire, then Helena is not attractive and Orlando is medical.
If there is someone who is medical, then Helena is attractive and Amanda is entire.
If Henry is naughty, then Joshua is not attractive.
If there is someone who is steep, then Joshua is entire and Henry is medical.
Someone who is not itchy is always both attractive and not naughty.
Someone being attractive is equivalent to being itchy.
If there is at least one people who is not entire or not attractive, then Joshua is itchy.
Someone being not steep is equivalent to being not attractive.
Henry being not entire implies that Helena is not attractive and Joshua is itchy.
If there is nobody who is not naughty, then Orlando is attractive and Joshua is not entire.
If Orlando is attractive or Orlando is not naughty, then Helena is not itchy. | Joshua is not itchy. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.