premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Arlen is not curious. | entailment |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Arlen is not friendly. | neutral |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Baldwin is angry. | contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Leona is not latter. | self_contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Leona is successful. | neutral |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Gabriel is not powerful. | contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Baldwin is not friendly. | entailment |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Arlen is powerful. | entailment |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Angelique is latter. | contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Uriah is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Gabriel is not curious. | neutral |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Harris is successful. | contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Uriah is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Baldwin is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Angelique is not successful. | neutral |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Harris is not powerful. | neutral |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Uriah is latter. | self_contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Angelique is not latter. | entailment |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Harris is friendly. | contradiction |
Leona is friendly.
Angelique is powerful.
Baldwin is powerful.
Harris is not friendly.
Gabriel is successful.
Leona is not powerful.
Gabriel is not latter.
Arlen is not angry.
Gabriel is angry.
Arlen is not latter.
Arlen is not curious.
Gabriel is powerful.If Angelique is not latter, then Uriah is friendly and Angelique is not angry.
If someone is not angry or latter, then he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not friendly and not angry, then Baldwin is not powerful.
Gabriel being not latter is equivalent to Harris being curious and Baldwin being not angry.
It can be concluded that Harris is not latter once knowing that Arlen is curious.
If someone is curious, then he is not successful, and vice versa.
Someone being both powerful and latter is equivalent to being friendly.
If someone is curious or not powerful, then he is not latter.
If there is at least one people who is either curious or latter, then Baldwin is not friendly and Baldwin is not powerful.
If someone is powerful, then he is not latter.
Baldwin being angry implies that Uriah is latter.
If someone is friendly, then he is both not powerful and not angry. | Baldwin is not latter. | entailment |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Luna is not sticky. | self_contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Culbert is sticky. | neutral |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Everett is not basic. | neutral |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Everett is not careful. | contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Everett is not happy. | self_contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Luna is careful. | self_contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Bruno is not basic. | neutral |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Luna is basic. | entailment |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Luna is not careful. | self_contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Luna is sticky. | self_contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Chandler is not tall. | entailment |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Everett is not dizzy. | contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Kathryn is not happy. | entailment |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Chandler is not sticky. | entailment |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Kathryn is basic. | neutral |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Chandler is not careful. | contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Lloyd is careful. | neutral |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Chandler is tall. | contradiction |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Lloyd is happy. | entailment |
Culbert is not happy.
Kathryn is careful.
Bruno is dizzy.
Chandler is not sticky.
Chandler is not happy.
Everett is happy.
Everett is not sticky.
Luna is sticky.
Luna is not tall.
Luna is dizzy.
Lloyd is happy.
Everett is dizzy.If Chandler is happy or Bruno is dizzy, then Lloyd is tall.
If there is at least one people who is both careful and not basic, then Kathryn is not sticky.
If there is at least one people who is not sticky, then Bruno is not happy and Culbert is tall.
Someone is not careful if and only if he is basic.
If someone is careful, then he is not sticky, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not dizzy or not sticky is always not tall.
Someone who is both not tall and not sticky is always not happy.
If someone is either not basic or sticky, then he is not happy and not careful.
All sticky people are careful.
If everyone is careful or basic, then Culbert is not dizzy.
If Kathryn is not basic or Chandler is happy, then Luna is not dizzy.
Kathryn being not basic is equivalent to Luna being tall and Culbert being not sticky. | Luna is tall. | contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Stanley is diplomatic. | self_contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Isabel is not neat. | entailment |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Isabel is neat. | contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Isabel is not tame. | neutral |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Stanley is not wrong. | contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Bruce is not tame. | entailment |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Connell is vivacious. | self_contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Graham is not diplomatic. | entailment |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Connell is ashamed. | entailment |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Bruce is wrong. | neutral |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Ambrose is neat. | neutral |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Stanley is not diplomatic. | self_contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Connell is diplomatic. | self_contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Bruce is not wrong. | neutral |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Connell is not diplomatic. | self_contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Graham is neat. | entailment |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Tony is not neat. | contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Connell is not neat. | neutral |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Graham is not neat. | contradiction |
Stanley is wrong.
Graham is neat.
Isabel is not neat.
Connell is vivacious.
Bruce is not tame.
Graham is not wrong.
Tony is tame.
Tony is neat.
Stanley is not vivacious.
Graham is vivacious.
Connell is not diplomatic.
Connell is ashamed.if there is at least one people who is vivacious and not neat, then Graham is ashamed and Connell is wrong.
Ambrose being vivacious implies that Bruce is not tame.
It can be concluded that Isabel is not wrong once knowing that Bruce is tame and Connell is neat.
If someone is diplomatic, then he is both not tame and not vivacious.
Someone who is not vivacious is always both ashamed and not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic.
If there is someone who is tame, then Bruce is not diplomatic and Ambrose is vivacious.
Someone is not tame and diplomatic if and only if he is ashamed.
If there is at least one people who is both wrong and not tame, then Bruce is not vivacious.
Tony being diplomatic or Stanley being not ashamed implies that Tony is not wrong.
As long as someone is not wrong, he is not diplomatic and not ashamed.
It can be concluded that Graham is vivacious once knowing that Bruce is not wrong or Stanley is neat. | Bruce is tame. | contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chad is nice. | contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chad is dizzy. | entailment |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chandler is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chad is fair-minded. | entailment |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Gardner is not dizzy. | contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Uriah is not obnoxious. | neutral |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chandler is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Carlton is dizzy. | neutral |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Gardner is fair-minded. | contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Stanley is not dishonest. | entailment |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Carlton is dishonest. | entailment |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Gardner is not dishonest. | neutral |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chandler is not dishonest. | entailment |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Stanley is weak. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Stanley is not fair-minded. | neutral |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chandler is weak. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chandler is not fair-minded. | contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chandler is dizzy. | neutral |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Chandler is nice. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is dishonest.
Chad is dizzy.
Hall is obnoxious.
Chandler is weak.
Gardner is not weak.
Gardner is not fair-minded.
Stanley is not dishonest.
Hall is not dishonest.
Chandler is not dishonest.
Chad is fair-minded.
Hall is dizzy.
Chandler is not nice.If there is at least one people who is not dishonest, then Stanley is weak and Gardner is dizzy.
Carlton being dizzy or Carlton being nice implies that Hall is fair-minded.
Someone who is obnoxious or not dishonest is always not weak and nice.
If there is someone who is either not nice or dishonest, then Stanley is not dizzy.
Someone being both not dizzy and not obnoxious is equivalent to being not fair-minded and weak.
If someone is both not fair-minded and not weak, then he is dizzy.
If Uriah is not dizzy and Uriah is fair-minded, then Chandler is not obnoxious and Hall is not dishonest.
Chad being not nice is equivalent to Chandler being obnoxious and Carlton being dishonest.
Someone who is both not obnoxious and not fair-minded is always not dishonest.
If there is someone who is dishonest, then Chandler is fair-minded and Chandler is obnoxious.
If there is at least one people who is not dizzy, then Chandler is not weak.
Hall being not fair-minded and Hall being not nice imply that Carlton is dizzy. | Stanley is dizzy. | contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Colin is dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Rick is dynamic. | contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Brian is logical. | contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Brian is not logical. | entailment |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Rick is healthy. | entailment |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Rick is glorious. | self_contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Brian is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Miranda is not logical. | entailment |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Miranda is healthy. | neutral |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Colin is not glorious. | neutral |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Rick is fantastic. | contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Stewart is healthy. | contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Ambrose is glorious. | entailment |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Luna is not dynamic. | entailment |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Ambrose is not glorious. | contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Stewart is not fantastic. | neutral |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Miranda is helpless. | neutral |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Ambrose is not helpless. | neutral |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Rick is not logical. | self_contradiction |
Rick is not glorious.
Stewart is not healthy.
Luna is not dynamic.
Colin is dynamic.
Brian is not dynamic.
Rick is not logical.
Brian is healthy.
Brian is not logical.
Brian is helpless.
Miranda is not logical.
Ambrose is glorious.
Ambrose is not fantastic.If there is someone who is either fantastic or not logical, then Colin is not dynamic.
If someone who is helpless is also not dynamic, then he is not healthy.
If someone is not fantastic, then he is healthy, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Rick is glorious.
If there is someone who is glorious, then Rick is not dynamic and Luna is fantastic.
If someone is logical, then he is both not helpless and not fantastic.
Rick being fantastic implies that Luna is not logical and Colin is helpless.
If there is someone who is either logical or healthy, then Luna is not dynamic.
It can be concluded that Ambrose is not fantastic once knowing that Miranda is not logical and Ambrose is helpless.
Someone who is dynamic is always not logical.
Someone who is not healthy is always not logical.
If there is someone who is both glorious and healthy, then Rick is logical. | Colin is not dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.