premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Walter is clear. | entailment |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Sophie is not frail. | neutral |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Walter is big. | neutral |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Walter is not global. | entailment |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Walter is not frail. | entailment |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Carlton is not frail. | contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Carlton is global. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Carlton is not orange. | contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Sophie is orange. | contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Walter is not orange. | contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Walter is orange. | entailment |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Carlton is not global. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Herbert is orange. | neutral |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Herbert is not global. | neutral |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Carlton is frail. | entailment |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Carlton is sad. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Carlton is not sad. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Coleman is sad. | self_contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Hadwin is sad. | contradiction |
Carlton is clear.
Walter is not frail.
Carlton is not global.
Hadwin is not sad.
Carlton is orange.
Carlton is big.
Walter is not global.
Walter is orange.
Norris is orange.
Coleman is not sad.
Sophie is not clear.
Walter is clear.Herbert being not sad or Carlton being big implies that Sophie is not orange.
Hadwin being global implies that Sophie is sad and Coleman is not big.
Hadwin being clear and Sophie being not global imply that Hadwin is not orange.
Someone being both orange and frail is equivalent to being not sad and global.
If there is someone who is both not global and orange, then Carlton is frail.
If Norris is big, then Walter is frail and Hadwin is not clear, and vice versa.
Someone being frail is equivalent to being sad.
If there is someone who is not clear, then Coleman is global.
If someone is not clear, then he is not orange.
It can be concluded that Herbert is orange once knowing that Coleman is not global.
If Norris is not frail and Hadwin is not big, then Herbert is sad and Coleman is clear, and vice versa.
Walter is not global if and only if Sophie is not big and Carlton is sad. | Norris is big. | neutral |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Paxton is not funny. | entailment |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Goddard is naughty. | neutral |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Rosie is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Rosie is confident. | self_contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Paxton is ugliest. | entailment |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Rosie is not confident. | self_contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Marion is naughty. | neutral |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Goddard is not ugliest. | contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Burton is not funny. | contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Rex is funny. | entailment |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Burton is dizzy. | neutral |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Marion is dizzy. | neutral |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Alastair is dizzy. | entailment |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Paxton is not dizzy. | entailment |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Paxton is funny. | contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Alastair is naughty. | contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Rex is not ugliest. | self_contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Alastair is not funny. | contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Rosie is funny. | self_contradiction |
Burton is ugliest.
Rex is ugliest.
Alastair is funny.
Paxton is not dizzy.
Rosie is confident.
Rosie is not ugliest.
Goddard is ugliest.
Rex is not visible.
Rosie is naughty.
Alastair is dizzy.
Burton is not visible.
Rosie is visible.Marion being not visible and Rex being naughty are equivalent to Rosie being not confident and Paxton being dizzy.
If someone who is not visible is also not dizzy, then he is confident.
If someone who is funny is also dizzy, then he is not naughty.
If someone is both not dizzy and not funny, then he is ugliest.
If someone is naughty, then he is both not ugliest and not confident.
Paxton is confident if and only if Rosie is visible.
Someone who is confident is always not funny.
If someone is not confident or not visible, then he is funny.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and confident, then Goddard is visible.
If someone is not naughty, then he is not confident, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not confident and ugliest, then Rex is not visible.
If Rex is not ugliest, then Paxton is not dizzy, and vice versa. | Goddard is visible. | neutral |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Louis is not innocent. | self_contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Louis is courageous. | neutral |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Chandler is not innocent. | neutral |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Antonio is innocent. | contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Benton is not innocent. | entailment |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Benton is similar. | neutral |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Chandler is not courageous. | contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Louis is hard-working. | entailment |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Maddox is hard-working. | self_contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Chandler is not impressive. | self_contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Maddox is not impressive. | neutral |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Morton is courageous. | contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Bert is not hard-working. | contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Maddox is courageous. | entailment |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Chandler is impressive. | self_contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Louis is not hard-working. | contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Morton is not innocent. | entailment |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Louis is impressive. | neutral |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Maddox is innocent. | self_contradiction |
Morton is not courageous.
Louis is not similar.
Chandler is not hard-working.
Benton is not innocent.
Maddox is not similar.
Bert is not impressive.
Morton is not innocent.
Antonio is not similar.
Chandler is not impressive.
Louis is large.
Benton is not large.
Morton is similar.Someone is not innocent and not hard-working if and only if he is courageous and large.
Someone who is eithor impressive or not hard-working is always courageous.
If there is at least one people who is not courageous, then Chandler is impressive.
Someone who is both large and not impressive is always not courageous.
If there is someone who is not innocent, then Antonio is not impressive and Bert is large.
All not similar people are not innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not similar, then Morton is not impressive.
If someone is large, then he is both innocent and hard-working.
If there is someone who is both similar and not hard-working, then Bert is courageous.
It can be concluded that Morton is not large once knowing that Antonio is not innocent or Antonio is similar.
If there is someone who is not similar, then Maddox is not hard-working.
If Bert is not large, then Maddox is not similar and Antonio is not hard-working, and vice versa. | Antonio is not similar. | entailment |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Ryan is not difficult. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Ryan is not humble. | entailment |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Robert is adventurous. | neutral |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Danna is difficult. | entailment |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Claude is not panicky. | contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Danna is not electronic. | contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Joshua is not panicky. | entailment |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Danna is not warm-hearted. | neutral |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Danna is electronic. | entailment |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Joshua is adventurous. | entailment |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Claude is difficult. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Joshua is not warm-hearted. | neutral |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Peter is not electronic. | neutral |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Robert is humble. | contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Claude is not electronic. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Claude is not difficult. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Alfie is not difficult. | neutral |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Danna is humble. | contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Claude is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Joshua is adventurous.
Joshua is difficult.
Claude is not adventurous.
Robert is not electronic.
Danna is difficult.
Danna is not humble.
Ryan is not electronic.
Peter is humble.
Danna is electronic.
Claude is not difficult.
Ryan is difficult.
Alfie is warm-hearted.If there is at least one people who is both not electronic and not difficult, then Claude is adventurous.
Someone is not difficult if and only if he is not electronic.
if there is at least one people who is not electronic and not humble, then Peter is not warm-hearted and Claude is not adventurous.
If Ryan is difficult, then Ryan is panicky, and vice versa.
If someone is not difficult, then he is not humble.
If there is someone who is either not humble or difficult, then Joshua is not panicky.
Someone who is not adventurous is always both difficult and electronic.
If there is at least one people who is electronic or difficult, then Claude is not adventurous.
Someone being both humble and not electronic is equivalent to being not panicky and not adventurous.
Someone who is both not humble and difficult is always panicky.
Joshua is warm-hearted if and only if Joshua is panicky.
Danna being warm-hearted implies that Joshua is not adventurous. | Peter is warm-hearted. | contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Matthew is mad. | contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Randolph is mad. | self_contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Guy is mad. | self_contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Randolph is not mad. | self_contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Matthew is not global. | entailment |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Matthew is not interesting. | entailment |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Randolph is puny. | neutral |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Matthew is not weak. | contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Chester is global. | neutral |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Albern is mad. | entailment |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Randolph is not global. | self_contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Matthew is interesting. | contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Chester is not famous. | entailment |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Matthew is global. | contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Matthew is not famous. | neutral |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Guy is puny. | neutral |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Guy is not mad. | self_contradiction |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Bond is interesting. | neutral |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Guy is famous. | entailment |
Guy is weak.
Guy is not mad.
Randolph is not global.
Matthew is not global.
Chester is not famous.
Matthew is not mad.
Albern is not global.
Randolph is mad.
Randolph is famous.
Guy is interesting.
Matthew is weak.
Albern is mad.If Albern is puny, then Randolph is not weak and Albern is famous.
If Chester is not weak or Bond is puny, then Albern is interesting.
It can be concluded that Guy is global and Randolph is not mad once knowing that Albern is not puny.
Someone being both not mad and interesting is equivalent to being famous.
If someone is not puny, then he is global.
Someone is mad and global if and only if he is famous.
If there is someone who is puny, then Chester is global and Matthew is famous.
If someone who is interesting is also not famous, then he is weak.
If Guy is mad, then Matthew is not interesting.
If Bond is not global or Guy is not weak, then Bond is not famous.
It can be concluded that Albern is not puny once knowing that Glenn is not interesting.
If someone is not puny, then he is weak. | Guy is not famous. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.