premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Samson is not gentle. | entailment |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Deborah is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Colin is fantastic. | entailment |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kerwin is not gentle. | contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kerwin is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kerwin is not fantastic. | contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Samson is gentle. | contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kane is not foolish. | contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kane is not helpful. | entailment |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Deborah is not concerned. | neutral |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kane is not fantastic. | self_contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Deborah is not helpful. | neutral |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Chrysta is not gentle. | neutral |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kane is not gentle. | neutral |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Deborah is not fantastic. | entailment |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kerwin is fantastic. | entailment |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Deborah is gentle. | self_contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kerwin is not foolish. | contradiction |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Kerwin is helpful. | neutral |
Samson is not gentle.
Kerwin is concerned.
Kerwin is exuberant.
Chrysta is concerned.
Kerwin is fantastic.
Colin is fantastic.
Kane is foolish.
Deborah is not exuberant.
Nathalie is gentle.
Kane is not helpful.
Colin is not exuberant.
Colin is gentle.If there is someone who is helpful, then Kerwin is gentle.
if there is at least one people who is gentle and helpful, then Deborah is not concerned and Deborah is foolish.
If there is someone who is either gentle or foolish, then Nathalie is not fantastic.
If there is at least one people who is not exuberant or not gentle, then Deborah is not fantastic.
If someone is not helpful, then he is not concerned.
If someone is not exuberant or he is not foolish, then he is not gentle.
Someone being both not concerned and foolish is equivalent to being fantastic.
If someone is not foolish or helpful, then he is not gentle.
If Kerwin is not concerned, then Deborah is gentle and Kane is not fantastic.
If Samson is exuberant, then Chrysta is fantastic and Samson is not foolish, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is helpful, then Kane is gentle.
Someone is gentle if and only if he is exuberant. | Colin is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Melody is not agreeable. | neutral |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Trent is wooden. | entailment |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Melody is agreeable. | neutral |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Trent is not wooden. | contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Maggie is not agreeable. | entailment |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Trent is not impartial. | self_contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Kilian is not successful. | self_contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Lucia is successful. | contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Trent is agreeable. | contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Olin is not impartial. | entailment |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Trent is severe. | contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Avery is agreeable. | neutral |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Kilian is successful. | self_contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Melody is wooden. | neutral |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Trent is not severe. | entailment |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Maggie is attentive. | neutral |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Lucia is not successful. | entailment |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Kilian is agreeable. | contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Olin is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Lucia is not successful.
Trent is not severe.
Maggie is not impartial.
Kilian is not impartial.
Trent is not attentive.
Olin is not wooden.
Trent is impartial.
Trent is wooden.
Avery is not attentive.
Maggie is not agreeable.
Lucia is wooden.
Kilian is not agreeable.Someone who is not wooden is always both successful and severe.
If there is someone who is agreeable, then Trent is not attentive and Maggie is successful.
Trent being not successful implies that Kilian is severe.
If there is at least one people who is both not attentive and impartial, then Lucia is successful.
Maggie being wooden is equivalent to Trent being not agreeable and Kilian being not successful.
It can be concluded that Trent is not agreeable once knowing that Lucia is severe and Trent is not successful.
If Melody is not successful or Lucia is not severe, then Trent is impartial.
Avery being not impartial is equivalent to Maggie being severe and Maggie being wooden.
If Melody is severe, then Lucia is wooden and Avery is successful.
If there is at least one people who is not severe or impartial, then Kilian is successful.
Someone who is eithor agreeable or successful is always not impartial.
If someone is wooden, then he is not impartial, and vice versa. | Trent is impartial. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Alfred is not hard-working. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Alfred is not impossible. | contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Hector is hard-working. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Alfred is impossible. | entailment |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Connell is interesting. | contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Connell is not hard-working. | entailment |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Herbert is hard-working. | contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Connell is not impossible. | entailment |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Hector is not interesting. | neutral |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Sabrina is not strange. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Calvin is interesting. | entailment |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Calvin is aggressive. | neutral |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Sabrina is not interesting. | neutral |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Connell is hard-working. | contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Herbert is not aggressive. | neutral |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Sabrina is not available. | neutral |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Sabrina is strange. | self_contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Hector is not aggressive. | entailment |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Hector is aggressive. | contradiction |
Calvin is not strange.
Herbert is not hard-working.
Hector is not aggressive.
Alfred is impossible.
Alfred is interesting.
Sabrina is strange.
Hector is hard-working.
Connell is not impossible.
Alfred is not hard-working.
Collier is not available.
Connell is not interesting.
Calvin is hard-working.If someone is interesting or not aggressive, then he is hard-working.
Someone who is not strange is always impossible.
If there is at least one people who is aggressive or not hard-working, then Collier is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is both strange and not aggressive, then Connell is available.
If someone is not interesting or he is not aggressive, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is hard-working, then Calvin is interesting and Sabrina is strange.
Someone is not impossible if and only if he is not interesting.
If there is at least one people who is available, then Collier is not strange.
If Connell is available, then Alfred is not aggressive and Calvin is strange, and vice versa.
Someone who is both available and not hard-working is always strange.
If there is someone who is not interesting, then Collier is not available and Sabrina is not strange.
Herbert being interesting implies that Alfred is available and Sabrina is strange. | Hector is not hard-working. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Hartley is disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Hartley is repulsive. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Cedric is not repulsive. | neutral |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Clifford is disturbed. | contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Pierce is repulsive. | contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Cedric is not naughty. | contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Clifford is not latter. | neutral |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Clifford is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Arthur is disturbed. | neutral |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Hartley is not disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Clifford is crazy. | neutral |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Arthur is not repulsive. | entailment |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Hartley is not repulsive. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Clifford is latter. | neutral |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Arthur is naughty. | contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Arthur is crazy. | entailment |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Arthur is not naughty. | entailment |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Clifford is repulsive. | contradiction |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Phineas is disturbed. | entailment |
Hartley is naughty.
Pierce is crazy.
Phineas is not crazy.
Pierce is not repulsive.
Clifford is not naughty.
Hartley is not crazy.
Clifford is itchy.
Arthur is not naughty.
Clifford is not disturbed.
Arthur is crazy.
Cedric is not disturbed.
Arthur is itchy.If someone is not naughty or he is not crazy, then he is not repulsive.
All not latter people are not crazy.
Arthur is disturbed if and only if Arthur is repulsive and Casper is latter.
If there is someone who is both not disturbed and itchy, then Clifford is not naughty.
Someone is not naughty and repulsive if and only if he is disturbed.
Someone who is not crazy is always both repulsive and disturbed.
Pierce being crazy and Hartley being not itchy imply that Hartley is disturbed.
Someone is repulsive and itchy if and only if he is not latter.
It can be concluded that Clifford is repulsive once knowing that Arthur is not crazy and Clifford is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is latter, then Arthur is repulsive.
If someone is not disturbed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
Hartley is latter if and only if Cedric is itchy and Arthur is disturbed. | Clifford is itchy. | entailment |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Robert is superior. | neutral |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Marlon is thoughtless. | entailment |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Scott is unfair. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Scott is few. | contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Miranda is distracted. | neutral |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Marlon is not thoughtless. | contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Marlon is not charming. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Robert is unfair. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Tracey is few. | entailment |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Lauren is not unfair. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Miranda is not unfair. | neutral |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Alexis is distracted. | neutral |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Scott is not few. | entailment |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Lauren is distracted. | self_contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Tracey is not superior. | entailment |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Alexis is thoughtless. | contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Miranda is superior. | neutral |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Tracey is superior. | contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Alexis is not unfair. | contradiction |
Alexis is not thoughtless.
Marlon is not superior.
Scott is distracted.
Lauren is distracted.
Marlon is not charming.
Miranda is not thoughtless.
Alexis is unfair.
Robert is not few.
Lauren is superior.
Robert is not charming.
Tracey is not superior.
Tracey is not distracted.As long as someone is not superior, he is not distracted and few.
Marlon is superior if and only if Miranda is not charming.
If there is someone who is both distracted and charming, then Lauren is not few and Alexis is unfair.
Miranda is not distracted if and only if Marlon is not thoughtless and Robert is not charming.
If someone is not charming, then he is thoughtless, and vice versa.
If someone is distracted and not thoughtless, then he is not few, and vice versa.
All distracted people are not thoughtless.
If Lauren is not superior and Tracey is few, then Alexis is not charming.
Someone is not thoughtless and not charming if and only if he is unfair and not distracted.
If someone is thoughtless or not unfair, then he is charming.
If someone is not unfair and not charming, then he is both distracted and not thoughtless, and vice versa.
If Marlon is not thoughtless, then Tracey is distracted, and vice versa. | Marlon is not distracted. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.