premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Michael is salty. | contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Rachelle is not plain. | contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Michael is plain. | entailment |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Rachelle is odd. | contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Michael is not salty. | entailment |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Marion is not odd. | entailment |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Sherlock is romantic. | self_contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Burton is salty. | neutral |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Rachelle is plain. | entailment |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Rachelle is not romantic. | self_contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Sherlock is not romantic. | self_contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Burton is not romantic. | neutral |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Rachelle is salty. | neutral |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Clive is plain. | entailment |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Sherlock is odd. | contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Michael is not timid. | neutral |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Rachelle is romantic. | self_contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Burton is not plain. | contradiction |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Jessie is not plain. | neutral |
Michael is plain.
Marion is not timid.
Michael is not salty.
Marion is salty.
Rachelle is not romantic.
Clive is plain.
Michael is not adorable.
Sherlock is adorable.
Sherlock is not romantic.
Rachelle is not odd.
Michael is not odd.
Jessie is not salty.It can be concluded that Burton is adorable and Rachelle is timid once knowing that Marion is not romantic.
Someone is not odd and timid if and only if he is adorable and not salty.
If someone is both timid and adorable, then he is not odd.
If someone is timid or adorable, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is both adorable and not timid, then Clive is not plain.
If Burton is not adorable and Clive is not timid, then Burton is not romantic.
If there is at least one people who is either not salty or timid, then Burton is plain and Sherlock is not odd.
Someone who is both not salty and not romantic is always not odd.
If there is at least one people who is not salty, then Clive is timid and Michael is odd.
Someone who is not timid or not odd is always plain and romantic.
If Clive is not plain and Michael is romantic, then Sherlock is not odd and Michael is not timid, and vice versa.
If someone is not odd and salty, then he is not timid, and vice versa. | Michael is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Traci is not cheeky. | neutral |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Traci is troubled. | entailment |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Carlos is not typical. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Carlos is cheeky. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Ambrose is not mad. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Carlos is troubled. | entailment |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Carlos is not diplomatic. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Olaf is not mad. | neutral |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Burton is mad. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Leona is not typical. | neutral |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Carlos is diplomatic. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Burton is not cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Traci is mad. | entailment |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Burton is not diplomatic. | entailment |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Burton is typical. | entailment |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Traci is critical. | neutral |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Burton is cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Burton is not critical. | contradiction |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Traci is cheeky. | neutral |
Ambrose is not critical.
Kane is not typical.
Carlos is not cheeky.
Carlos is diplomatic.
Kane is not mad.
Traci is typical.
Burton is not mad.
Leona is not troubled.
Olaf is troubled.
Ambrose is not cheeky.
Burton is typical.
Olaf is critical.If Ambrose is mad, then Kane is not typical, and vice versa.
If everyone is cheeky or not critical, then Carlos is not typical.
If there is at least one people who is both mad and not diplomatic, then Olaf is not troubled.
If someone is critical and not cheeky, then he is not mad, and vice versa.
If someone is mad or he is not cheeky, then he is troubled.
If there is someone who is typical, then Carlos is mad and Carlos is not diplomatic.
if there is at least one people who is not cheeky and not diplomatic, then Traci is mad and Traci is typical.
If there is at least one people who is mad, then Burton is not diplomatic.
If Leona is not troubled, then Olaf is diplomatic and Carlos is typical.
Someone who is not troubled and mad is always diplomatic and cheeky.
All critical people are cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is not diplomatic or not cheeky, then Carlos is not critical. | Kane is not cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Leonard is black. | entailment |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Leonard is not large. | neutral |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Gilbert is black. | entailment |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Quimby is not loyal. | neutral |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Johnny is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Johnny is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Quimby is adventurous. | entailment |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Leonard is good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Leonard is not good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Kim is not loyal. | neutral |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Kim is good-tempered. | neutral |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Leonard is adventurous. | entailment |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Quimby is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Gilbert is imaginative. | entailment |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Kim is not imaginative. | contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Leith is loyal. | contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Leonard is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Sherman is imaginative. | contradiction |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Quimby is not black. | neutral |
Johnny is not imaginative.
Quimby is not imaginative.
Johnny is not loyal.
Leith is not loyal.
Leonard is imaginative.
Johnny is not adventurous.
Sherman is not imaginative.
Gilbert is not loyal.
Leonard is good-tempered.
Kim is imaginative.
Sherman is loyal.
Quimby is adventurous.Quimby is not large if and only if Leith is not imaginative and Quimby is good-tempered.
Sherman being not large is equivalent to Johnny being not good-tempered.
Someone is not black and loyal if and only if he is large and not good-tempered.
If Kim is not adventurous and Quimby is not loyal, then Leith is large and Johnny is good-tempered, and vice versa.
If someone is black, then he is both adventurous and not good-tempered.
If there is someone who is either large or not loyal, then Leonard is black.
It can be concluded that Johnny is imaginative once knowing that Sherman is not good-tempered.
It can be concluded that Leith is not good-tempered once knowing that Quimby is loyal and Quimby is not large.
If Sherman is imaginative or Quimby is not good-tempered, then Sherman is not loyal.
If someone is imaginative and black, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
Leonard being imaginative or Kim being not loyal implies that Gilbert is good-tempered.
Sherman being large and Sherman being black imply that Leith is adventurous. | Gilbert is not good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Rufus is not adventurous. | neutral |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Hunter is better. | self_contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Stephen is shiny. | contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Rufus is better. | neutral |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Harmony is blushing. | entailment |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Stephen is better. | entailment |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Rufus is tough. | entailment |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Hunter is tough. | self_contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Harmony is shiny. | contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Deborah is better. | self_contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Stephen is not better. | contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Harmony is better. | entailment |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Rufus is not tough. | contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Hunter is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Stephen is not tough. | neutral |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Hunter is not tough. | self_contradiction |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Hunter is adventurous. | entailment |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Aubrey is tough. | neutral |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Adrian is shiny. | neutral |
Harmony is blushing.
Adrian is not splendid.
Harmony is better.
Stephen is better.
Harmony is not shiny.
Rufus is tough.
Hunter is not better.
Rufus is not shiny.
Hunter is tough.
Stephen is not shiny.
Deborah is not better.
Deborah is splendid.If everyone is splendid, then Stephen is not tough and Hunter is shiny.
Someone is not better if and only if he is adventurous.
Someone is not adventurous and not splendid if and only if he is shiny.
If someone is not better, then he is both not tough and splendid.
Harmony is tough if and only if Rufus is not adventurous and Aubrey is shiny.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Aubrey is tough and Harmony is not better.
If Harmony is shiny, then Rufus is not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Stephen is tough and Rufus is not better, then Rufus is not splendid.
If Deborah is not better, then Deborah is tough.
Adrian being not splendid implies that Stephen is blushing.
Someone who is adventurous is always both splendid and better.
If there is someone who is both not splendid and not tough, then Rufus is not blushing. | Deborah is not better. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Adrian is not jealous. | contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Amanda is blue-eyed. | contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Stefan is not tidy. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Mila is cloudy. | neutral |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Amanda is not rich. | contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Stefan is not rich. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Luna is not cloudy. | neutral |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Adrian is jealous. | entailment |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Avery is blue-eyed. | neutral |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Avery is not tidy. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Amanda is cloudy. | entailment |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Amanda is not blue-eyed. | entailment |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Stefan is tidy. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Amanda is not jealous. | neutral |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Mila is not tidy. | entailment |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Stefan is rich. | self_contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Boris is not cloudy. | contradiction |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Boris is blue-eyed. | entailment |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Amanda is not strange. | neutral |
Mila is not rich.
Mila is not strange.
Mila is blue-eyed.
Adrian is strange.
Avery is jealous.
Adrian is jealous.
Avery is tidy.
Stefan is rich.
Amanda is rich.
Stefan is not cloudy.
Boris is blue-eyed.
Boris is cloudy.If someone is not jealous or not rich, then he is not tidy.
Mila being cloudy implies that Adrian is not rich and Mila is jealous.
Someone who is both not cloudy and not rich is always not strange.
Amanda being not tidy and Boris being not strange imply that Mila is cloudy.
If someone is tidy, then he is not cloudy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not jealous or not cloudy is always not tidy.
If there is at least one people who is jealous or cloudy, then Amanda is not blue-eyed.
Mila being blue-eyed or Mila being jealous implies that Amanda is cloudy.
If someone is not cloudy and not blue-eyed, then he is both not rich and not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone is not rich if and only if he is not tidy.
If someone is tidy and cloudy, then he is not jealous, and vice versa.
If Adrian is jealous, then Avery is not cloudy. | Amanda is not cloudy. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.