premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Abner is not crazy. | entailment |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Spencer is round. | neutral |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Baldwin is not wooden. | contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Collier is not intellectual. | neutral |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Miranda is not reserved. | self_contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Miranda is round. | self_contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Baldwin is not zealous. | contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Abner is not reserved. | contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Miranda is zealous. | entailment |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Baldwin is not reserved. | self_contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Collier is intellectual. | neutral |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Spencer is not crazy. | entailment |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Angelique is not zealous. | contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Miranda is not round. | self_contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Miranda is not zealous. | contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Baldwin is zealous. | entailment |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Collier is crazy. | neutral |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Miranda is reserved. | self_contradiction |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Baldwin is not crazy. | entailment |
Miranda is not reserved.
Baldwin is wooden.
Quinn is not zealous.
Spencer is intellectual.
Angelique is round.
Abner is not crazy.
Miranda is not round.
Abner is zealous.
Quinn is not intellectual.
Spencer is not wooden.
Angelique is intellectual.
Spencer is not crazy.All reserved people are not crazy.
Someone being both reserved and crazy is equivalent to being wooden and not zealous.
Someone who is eithor not crazy or intellectual is always zealous.
If Baldwin is not wooden, then Spencer is zealous and Baldwin is crazy, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor wooden or zealous is always reserved.
If there is nobody who is not not crazy, then Quinn is not intellectual and Collier is not reserved.
Abner being intellectual is equivalent to Miranda being round.
If someone is wooden, then he is not reserved, and vice versa.
Spencer being not crazy implies that Angelique is not wooden and Abner is intellectual.
If there is someone who is not round, then Angelique is reserved.
Someone is intellectual and wooden if and only if he is crazy and not round.
If there is nobody who is not not reserved, then Angelique is not wooden. | Collier is round. | neutral |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Morton is naughty. | contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Laurence is not naughty. | entailment |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Morton is fine. | neutral |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Tracey is zealous. | contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Traci is fine. | self_contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Morton is not zealous. | neutral |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Laurence is naughty. | contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Traci is guilty. | contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Tracey is not zealous. | entailment |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Braden is guilty. | neutral |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Alexis is not naughty. | entailment |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Tracey is blushing. | neutral |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Marvin is not zealous. | self_contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Traci is blushing. | contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Morton is not annoying. | entailment |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Morton is blushing. | neutral |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Marvin is not annoying. | entailment |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Traci is not annoying. | self_contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Marvin is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Traci is not blushing.
Tracey is not zealous.
Laurence is not naughty.
Traci is fine.
Traci is naughty.
Braden is fine.
Marvin is fine.
Alexis is not zealous.
Morton is guilty.
Marvin is guilty.
Tracey is not guilty.
Alexis is fine.As long as someone is fine, he is not annoying and not naughty.
Tracey is naughty if and only if Braden is not guilty.
If someone is blushing and guilty, then he is both not zealous and not fine, and vice versa.
Someone being both fine and guilty is equivalent to being naughty and blushing.
If there is someone who is both naughty and not annoying, then Braden is blushing.
Someone who is eithor guilty or not blushing is always not naughty.
If Braden is not annoying, then Morton is guilty and Braden is fine.
It can be concluded that Traci is annoying once knowing that Traci is not zealous or Marvin is not fine.
Someone is not naughty if and only if he is not annoying.
Someone who is naughty is always both not guilty and not fine.
Someone who is annoying is always naughty.
Someone being naughty is equivalent to being zealous. | Traci is annoying. | self_contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Glen is not white. | neutral |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Glen is puzzled. | neutral |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Isabel is not successful. | self_contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Claude is successful. | neutral |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Kingsley is not successful. | neutral |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Isabel is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Isabel is not puzzled. | contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Isabel is healthy. | self_contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Isabel is not dishonest. | self_contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Olaf is not healthy. | contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Claude is not healthy. | contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Olaf is dishonest. | entailment |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Hunter is not puzzled. | neutral |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Isabel is not white. | entailment |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Olaf is healthy. | entailment |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Sophie is white. | contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Kingsley is not dishonest. | contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Olaf is long. | entailment |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Isabel is successful. | self_contradiction |
Glen is not long.
Olaf is healthy.
Claude is healthy.
Olaf is dishonest.
Olaf is long.
Isabel is puzzled.
Isabel is not successful.
Olaf is puzzled.
Sophie is not white.
Kingsley is dishonest.
Isabel is dishonest.
Hunter is successful.Someone is not dishonest if and only if he is not successful.
Isabel being puzzled is equivalent to Hunter being white.
Someone who is not dishonest is always not healthy.
Someone who is puzzled is always healthy.
Someone being both not puzzled and dishonest is equivalent to being white and not successful.
If Hunter is not dishonest, then Isabel is successful.
Someone is puzzled and not white if and only if he is not healthy and not dishonest.
If someone is not healthy, then he is both puzzled and successful.
If Claude is not long, then Sophie is not healthy and Hunter is dishonest, and vice versa.
If Olaf is not healthy or Glen is not puzzled, then Isabel is long.
It can be concluded that Olaf is successful once knowing that Claude is not healthy or Sophie is not puzzled.
If Claude is not puzzled, then Sophie is not long. | Isabel is puzzled. | entailment |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Hector is dizzy. | neutral |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Solomon is not crazy. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Hector is crazy. | neutral |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Solomon is ugly. | contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Solomon is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Hector is tired. | contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Hartley is not self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Hartley is self-disciplined. | entailment |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Sabrina is ugly. | entailment |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Solomon is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Sabrina is not salty. | contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Stephen is not tired. | contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Solomon is dizzy. | entailment |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Hartley is ugly. | neutral |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Hector is not self-disciplined. | entailment |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Stephen is not dizzy. | neutral |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Sabrina is not dizzy. | neutral |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Hector is salty. | entailment |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Solomon is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Solomon is not ugly.
Blanche is not crazy.
Solomon is not crazy.
Sabrina is ugly.
Stephen is tired.
Blanche is self-disciplined.
Hector is not self-disciplined.
Solomon is dizzy.
Hartley is self-disciplined.
Blanche is ugly.
Solomon is not tired.
Stephen is self-disciplined.It can be concluded that Sabrina is self-disciplined and Blanche is ugly once knowing that Stephen is crazy.
If someone is ugly, then he is both salty and self-disciplined.
As long as someone is not ugly, he is not tired and not self-disciplined.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not salty and Hector is crazy once knowing that Hector is not ugly and Blanche is dizzy.
If someone is both not dizzy and not self-disciplined, then he is crazy.
Halden being self-disciplined or Sabrina being not crazy implies that Blanche is not ugly.
Someone is salty and not tired if and only if he is not self-disciplined.
Someone who is both not crazy and not ugly is always self-disciplined.
Blanche being not tired implies that Solomon is not self-disciplined and Stephen is not crazy.
Someone is not ugly if and only if he is crazy.
It can be concluded that Solomon is not dizzy once knowing that Hector is self-disciplined and Stephen is not salty.
Someone who is crazy is always both tired and salty. | Solomon is tired. | self_contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Shawn is not careless. | entailment |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Anthony is careless. | self_contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Tracey is tough. | neutral |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Norris is not repulsive. | neutral |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Norris is repulsive. | neutral |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Cuthbert is sad. | entailment |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Norris is not lucky. | entailment |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Norris is not careless. | self_contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Shawn is tough. | contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Norris is careless. | self_contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Stewart is lucky. | contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Norris is lucky. | contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Tracey is repulsive. | neutral |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Stewart is not tough. | self_contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Cuthbert is not repulsive. | entailment |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Stewart is not lucky. | entailment |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Morton is not lucky. | contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Shawn is not repulsive. | contradiction |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Norris is sad. | neutral |
Tracey is sad.
Morton is sad.
Anthony is not lucky.
Shawn is repulsive.
Morton is lucky.
Anthony is careless.
Tracey is not lucky.
Stewart is tough.
Norris is not agreeable.
Stewart is careless.
Stewart is not lucky.
Stewart is agreeable.Norris being not careless implies that Tracey is agreeable.
Tracey being sad implies that Shawn is not tough and Cuthbert is not repulsive.
If someone is not tough, then he is not careless, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Norris is not tough once knowing that Stewart is not sad or Shawn is repulsive.
If Shawn is not agreeable, then Stewart is tough and Cuthbert is lucky.
If there is at least one people who is tough, then Shawn is not sad and Cuthbert is not careless.
Norris being agreeable is equivalent to Stewart being not sad and Norris being not tough.
Someone who is both sad and tough is always agreeable.
If someone is not sad or lucky, then he is not careless.
If Stewart is not agreeable and Morton is repulsive, then Shawn is not lucky and Anthony is careless, and vice versa.
Someone is careless and not lucky if and only if he is not agreeable and not tough.
If there is someone who is not repulsive, then Cuthbert is sad. | Stewart is agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.