File size: 3,851 Bytes
095801f ac5d75e 095801f ac5d75e |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 |
---
annotations_creators:
- expert-generated
language_creators:
- machine-generated
languages:
- en
licenses:
- agpl-3.0
multilinguality:
- monolingual
pretty_name: STAN Large
size_categories:
- unknown
source_datasets:
- original
task_categories:
- structure-prediction
task_ids:
- structure-prediction-other-word-segmentation
---
# Dataset Card for STAN Large
## Dataset Description
- **Repository:** [mounicam/hashtag_master](https://github.com/mounicam/hashtag_master)
- **Paper:** [Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation](https://aclanthology.org/P19-1242/)
### Dataset Summary
The description below was taken from the paper "Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation"
by Maddela et al..
"STAN large, our new expert curated dataset, which includes all 12,594 unique English hashtags and their
associated tweets from the same Stanford dataset.
STAN small is the most commonly used dataset in previous work. However, after reexamination, we found annotation
errors in 6.8% of the hashtags in this dataset, which is significant given that the error rate of the state-of-the art
models is only around 10%. Most of the errors were related to named entities. For example, #lionhead,
which refers to the “Lionhead” video game company, was labeled as “lion head”.
We therefore constructed the STAN large dataset of 12,594 hashtags with additional quality control for human annotations."
### Languages
English
## Dataset Structure
### Data Instances
```
{
"index": 15,
"hashtag": "PokemonPlatinum",
"segmentation": "Pokemon platinum",
"alternatives": {
"segmentation": [
"Pokemon Platinum"
]
}
}
```
### Data Fields
- `index`: a numerical index.
- `hashtag`: the original hashtag.
- `segmentation`: the gold segmentation for the hashtag.
- `alternatives`: other segmentations that are also accepted as a gold segmentation.
### Citation Information
```
@inproceedings{maddela-etal-2019-multi,
title = "Multi-task Pairwise Neural Ranking for Hashtag Segmentation",
author = "Maddela, Mounica and
Xu, Wei and
Preo{\c{t}}iuc-Pietro, Daniel",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
month = jul,
year = "2019",
address = "Florence, Italy",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/P19-1242",
doi = "10.18653/v1/P19-1242",
pages = "2538--2549",
abstract = "Hashtags are often employed on social media and beyond to add metadata to a textual utterance with the goal of increasing discoverability, aiding search, or providing additional semantics. However, the semantic content of hashtags is not straightforward to infer as these represent ad-hoc conventions which frequently include multiple words joined together and can include abbreviations and unorthodox spellings. We build a dataset of 12,594 hashtags split into individual segments and propose a set of approaches for hashtag segmentation by framing it as a pairwise ranking problem between candidate segmentations. Our novel neural approaches demonstrate 24.6{\%} error reduction in hashtag segmentation accuracy compared to the current state-of-the-art method. Finally, we demonstrate that a deeper understanding of hashtag semantics obtained through segmentation is useful for downstream applications such as sentiment analysis, for which we achieved a 2.6{\%} increase in average recall on the SemEval 2017 sentiment analysis dataset.",
}
```
### Contributions
This dataset was added by [@ruanchaves](https://github.com/ruanchaves) while developing the [hashformers](https://github..com/ruanchaves/hashformers) library. |