Newsgroup: it.discussioni.ufo
Titolo: DOCUMENTO SU RAEL E DELGADO [X-POST CON IDM] - 26012003

Prot. N° 667/003/n
IL DOCUMENTO SUL LEGAME TRA RAEL E DELGADO
Sono MATTEO TENAN, segretario dell’USAC (CENTRO ACCADEMICO DI STUDI
UFOLOGICI).
Io personalmente ritengo che le idee di RAEL siano dannose per gli ufologi e
per l’umanità e quindi io sono di parte e ho sempre esposto senza ipocrisie
i miei punti di vista.
Vi allego un documento che deve farVi riflettere tutti.
Si tratta di una dichiarazione poco conosciuta, a favore della Clonazione da
parte di esponenti della Cultura Scientifica ufficiale, che risale a 2 anni
fa. Questi signori probabilmente direttamente o indirettamente hanno aiutato
e aiuteranno ancora il Movimento di RAEL ha diventare potente ed influente e
ad avanzare nei propri scopi.
Alcuni di costoro sono nemici acerrimi dell’ufologia. Altri sono membri
importanti di Logge massoniche sulla cui carriera lo scrittore DAVID ICKE
potrebbe scrivere un pamphlet. Devo lasciare questi approfondimenti alle
Vostre eventuali ricerche personali e passare all’argomento principale di
questo messaggio.
Uno dei firmatari è molto significativo: si tratta del dottor JOSÈ DELGADO,
neurochirurgo. Questo signore spagnolo è proprio quel DELGADO che ha
dedicato la propria vita allo studio dei microchip impiantabili nel corpo di
pazienti o di animali allo scopo di controllarne le funzioni corporee e la
volontà.
JOSE' MANUEL RODRIGUEZ DELGADO ha esposto le sue convinzioni, senza alcuna
vergogna nel libro "PHYSICAL CONTROL OF THE MIND - TOWARD A PSYCHOCIVILIZED
SOCIETY" pubblicato verso la fine degli anni ‘60.
Di conseguenza il processo di clonazione e manipolazione genetica con la
creazione di organismi geneticamente modificati sempre meno umani e lo
scenario di implantazione di microchip in vasti strati della popolazione
propugnato da parte della APPLIED DIGITAL SOLUTION vanno avanti insieme ed a
velocità sostenuta.
Si tratta di una semplice coincidenza, di applicazioni tecnologiche a fin di
bene oppure è parte integrante di un piano per l’instaurazione del Nuovo
Ordine Mondiale e la sottomissione definitiva dell’umanità?
E qual è il ruolo degli alieni (spaziali e/o di altre dimensioni) ed il loro
grado di coinvolgimento in tali operazioni?
È bene riflettere attentamente su questi interrogativi e sul significato
profondo di tutte le notizie ed informazioni che ci vengono fornite, perché
la posta in gioco è la stessa essenza di essere umano, come lo conosciamo
attualmente.
MATTEO TENAN
a titolo personale
RICOPIO
---------------------------------------------------
Declaration in Defense of Cloning and the Integrity of Scientific Research
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The following declaration is from Free Inquiry magazine, Volume 17, Number
3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
We, the undersigned, welcome announcements of major advances in the cloning
of higher animals. Throughout this century, the physical, biological, and
behavioral sciences have placed important new capabilities within human
reach. On balance, these advances have contributed to enormous improvements
in human welfare. Where novel technologies have raised legitimate ethical
questions, the human community has in general demonstrated its willingness
to confront those questions openly and to seek answers that enhance the
general welfare.
The cloning of higher animals raises ethical concerns. Appropriate
guidelines need to be developed that will prevent abuses, while making the
benefits of cloning maximally available. Such guidelines should respect to
the greatest extent possible the autonomy and choice of each individual
human being. Every effort should be made not to block the freedom and
integrity of scientific research.
No one has demonstrated a present capability to clone humans. Yet the very
possibility that contemporary achievements may open a path toward cloning
has sparked a hail of protests. We view with concern the widespread calls to
delay, defund, or discontinue cloning research which have come from sources
as disparate as President Bill Clinton in the United States, President
Jacques Chirac of France, former Prime Minister John Major of Great Britain,
and the Vatican in Rome.
We believe that reason is humanity's most powerful tool for untangling the
problems that it encounters. But reasoned argument has been a scarce
commodity in the recent flood of attacks on cloning. Critics have delighted
in drawing parallels to the myth of Icarus and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein,
predicting terrible consequences if researchers dare to press on with
questions whose answers "man was not meant to know." Behind the most
vituperative critiques seems to lie the assumption that human cloning would
raise moral issues more profound than those faced in connection with any
previous scientific or technological development.
What moral issues would human cloning raise? Some religions teach that human
beings are fundamentally different from other mammals - that humans have
been imbued with immortal souls by a deity, giving them a value that cannot
be compared to that of other living things. Human nature is held to be
unique and sacred. Scientific advances that pose a perceived risk of
altering this "nature" are angrily opposed.
Deeply rooted as such ideas may be in dogma, we question whether these
should be used to decide whether human beings will be permitted to benefit
from new biotechnology. As far as the scientific enterprise can determine,
Homo sapiens is a member of the animal kingdom. Human capabilities appear to
differ in degree, not in kind, from those found among the higher animals.
Humankind's rich repertoire of thoughts, feelings, aspirations, and hopes
seems to arise from electrochemical brain processes, not from an immaterial
soul that operates in ways no instrument can discover.
The immediate question raised by the current debate over cloning is,
therefore, do advocates of supernatural or spiritual agendas have truly
meaningful qualifications to contribute to that debate? Surely everyone has
the right to be heard. But we believe that there is a very real danger that
research with enormous potential benefits may be suppressed solely because
it conflicts with some people's religious beliefs. It is important to
recognize that similar religious objections were once raised against
autopsies, anesthesia, artificial insemination, and the entire genetic
revolution of our day - yet enormous benefits have accrued from each of
these developments. A view of human nature rooted in humanity's mythical
past ought not to be our primary criterion for making moral decisions about
cloning.
We see no inherent ethical dilemmas in cloning nonhuman higher animals. Nor
is it clear to us that future developments in cloning human tissues or even
cloning human beings will create moral predicaments beyond the capacity of
human reason to resolve. The moral issues raised by cloning are neither
larger nor more profound than the questions human beings have already faced
in regards to such technologies as nuclear energy, recombinant DNA, and
computer encryption. They are simply new.
Historically, the Luddite option, which seeks to turn back the clock and
limit or prohibit the application of already existing technologies, has
never proven realistic or productive. The potential benefits of cloning may
be so immense that it would be a tragedy if ancient theological scruples
should lead to a Luddite rejection of cloning. We call for continued,
responsible development of cloning technologies, and for a broad-based
commitment to ensuring that traditionalist and obscurantist views do not
irrelevantly obstruct beneficial scientific developments.
The signers of the Declaration are Humanist Laureates of the International
Academy of Humanism:
Pieter Admiraal, Medical Doctor, The Netherlands
Ruben Ardila, psychologist, National University of Colombia, Colombia
Sir Isaiah Berlin, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Oxford University, U.K.
Sir Hermann Bondi, Fellow of the Royal Society, Past Master, Churchill
College, Cambridge University, U.K.
Vern Bullough, Visiting Professor of Nursing, California State University at
Northridge, U.S.A.
Mario Bunge, Professor of Philosophy of Science, McGill University, Canada
Bernard Crick, Professor Emeritus of Politics, Birkbeck College, University
of London, U.K.
Francis Crick, Nobel Laureate in Physiology, Salk Institute, U.S.A.
Richard Dawkins, Charles Simionyi Professor of Public Understanding of
Science, Oxford University, U.K.
José Delgado, Director, Centro de Estudios Neurobiologicos, Spain
Paul Edwards, Professor of Philosophy, New School for Social Research,
U.S.A.
Antony Flew, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Reading University, U.K.
Johan Galtung, Professor of Sociology, University of Oslo, Norway
Adolf Grünbaum, Professor of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
Herbert Hauptman, Nobel Laureate, Professor of Biophysical Science, State
University of New York at Buffalo, U.S.A.
Alberto Hidalgo Tuñón, President, Sociedad Asturiana de Filosofía, Spain
Sergei Kapitza, Chair, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Russia
Paul Kurtz, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, State University of New York
at Buffalo, U.S.A.
Gerald A. Larue, Professor Emeritus of Archeology and Biblical Studies,
University of Southern California at Los Angeles, U.S.A.
Thelma Z. Lavine, Professor of Philosophy, George Mason University, U.S.A.
Jose Leite Lopes, Director, Centro Brasiliero de Pesquisas Fisicas, Brazil
Taslima Nasrin, Author, Physician, Social Critic, Bangladesh
Indumati Parikh, Reformer and Activist, India
Jean-Claude Pecker, Professor Emeritus of Astrophysics, Collège de France,
Academy of Sciences, France
W. V. Quine, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Harvard University, U.S.A.
J. J. C. Smart, Professor of Philosophy, University of Adelaide, Australia
V. M. Tarkunde, Reformer and Activist, India
Richard Taylor, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of Rochester,
U.S.A.
Simone Veil, Former President, European Parliament, France
Kurt Vonnegut, Novelist, U.S.A.
Edward O. Wilson, Professor Emeritus of Sociobiology, Harvard University,
U.S.A.
Affiliations listed for identification only.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 Subscribe to Free Inquiry
 Order Free Inquiry Back Issues
 Free Inquiry Home Page
 Secular Humanism Online Library
 Council for Secular Humanism Web Site
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Webm...@SecularHumanism.org
 This page was last updated 11/10/2000
Copyright notice:  The copyright for the contents of this web site rests
with the Council for Secular Humanism.
You may download and read the documents.  Without permission, you may not
alter this information, repost it, or sell it.
If you use a document, you are encouraged to make a donation to the Council
for Secular Humanism.
--------o--------------o------------------:------------------------:--------
-
FINE RICOPIATURA

 e aiuteranno ancora il Movimento di RAEL!!!!! ha !!!!!!diventare potente
