Newsgroup: it.scienza.biologia
Titolo: I fatti provano la Creazione

Maturità scientifica 2004: I fatti provano la Creazione.Il candidato esponga
le prove della Creazione in inglese.
Svolgimento
When we look at the facts around us what do we see? We see fossils, We see
geological strata, We see an atmosphere made up of nitrogen, oxygen,
carbon dioxide and hydrogen along with several small amounts of other
inert gases.  We see the hydrologic cycle in action,  We see the magnetic
effect on the earth.  We see the oceans teaming with all kinds of life.
We see the land with its flora and fauna.  We see the seasons as they come
and go and repeat over and over again.  These are all facts and no one can
dispute them unless he is a blind fool for all these facts can be measured
to some degree and we actually see them repeated over time.
Now we come to the interpretation of these facts.  What do they mean?
Where do they come from?  Where are they going?  How are they changing if
at all? How do they work together.  How old are they?  How young are
they?  Can we change them?
One sees these facts layed out in a naturalistic order and assumes they
came about by chance plus time.  He sees no outside cause to these facts
other than what he can see with his own eyes.  He calls this "science" and
claims his interpretation of these facts  is irrefutable and must be
accepted by all.
Another sees these facts in the light of cause and effect with the cause
as supernatural.  He sees great order and complexity and finds that these
facts fit a proscribed pattern layed down by the Great Pattern Maker.  He
sees these facts as the result of a plan which is described in the ancient
writings called the Bible.  He is struck with awe at the intricate and
wonderful works of the mighty hand of God(Psalms 139).
Now, these two interpretations cannot both be true for either these facts
are the result of chance plus time or they are the work of an all
powerful, all knowing, all present supernatural Being.  They both cannot
be true at the same time.  The question is then before all of us-which
interpretation do you choose?

 le prove della Creazione in inglese.
Sai Gianfranco? Mi hai convinto. Tu sei la prova vivente che Dio esiste.
Ed ha un senso dell'umorismo veramente crudele.
-- 
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.

interpretation do you choose?
Correzione...  da parte della carogna.
You can see only a fuck... but is'nt God!!!! It's my fuck.. :-)
Da parte della personcina seria.
Nessun fatto od osservazione empirico scientifica puo' dimostrare o
confutare il concetto di creazione, visto che e' un concetto
metafisico i cui fondamenti "esulano" i limiti d'applicazione del
metodo scientifico osservativo.
Al piu' come ho dimostrato per esteso nelle ricerche sinora fatte (a
livello universitario... non sul tuo gazebo) le osservazioni
scientifiche confutano con profusione di evidenze "particolari"
concezioni creazionistiche....
Ciao!!!!
VR
"La fonte principale degli attuali contrasti fra le sfere della 
religione e della scienza si trova nella concezione di un Dio 
personale." 
Albert Einstein. Pensieri di un uomo curioso, 
Oscar Mondadori Ed. 1997, Milano; p. 115. 
***************
La rivincita darwiniana 
sul reverendo Paley:
www.diolaico.it
***************