Newsgroup: it.cultura.single
Titolo: [sociologia] processi di globalizzazione

Adesso prometto che la pianto.
S.
-------------------
Just good friends
(Excerpt from: 'The Breakdown of the Military Intelligence Tyrannies')
www.contrapublishing.com
The close, often friendly relationship between these academics and the
military intelligence communities is additionally embarrassing, as it was
common knowledge since 1966-67 to what lengths the CIA was prepared to go
in
order to control the formation of public opinion in the Western world,
particularly when it was revealed that CIA money had funded the Congress
for Cultural Freedom. 1)
This ostensibly independent organisation domiciled in Paris was led by
the
CIA agent Michael Josselson (1950-67). The Congress for Cultural Freedom
had
offices in 35 countries, funded a long line of highbrow cultural events
and
published, or supported, more than 20 leading and well-reputed cultural
periodicals. The purpose of the CIA's efforts was to infiltrate the
European
intelligentsia with the aim of both keeping this group at a distance from
communism and preventing the third position - the emergent West European
attempts to find an independent, third way between communism and
capitalism - from becoming too critical of America.
What the American intelligence community had coveted and dared to embark
upon, to lead and control intellectuals, even in foreign nations - highly
educated people who passionately desire to 'come unto the knowledge of
truth' - ought to have been etched into the awareness of the European
intellectuals after 1967. And it is pathetic how little European
intellectuals managed to do, generally not understanding a jot of what
was
going on, when the same incessantly spawning intelligence communities
launched their second assault wave a decade or two later, now armed to
the
teeth with far more advanced impression management and mind control
methods,
and technology with a view to targeting whole populations and their
leaders
directly. 2) 3)
It seems I have set about delineating the contours of the enemy here. The
enemy, the military intelligence communities, destroy the time, studies,
work and love of defenceless civilians all over the world. They torture
and
rape. They are against the people, against us. At the same time, we are
witnessing, now the sales are on, alarmingly large numbers of
intellectuals
jumping the worldwide queue of peace researchers, contemporary
historians,
sociologists and journalists who are in favour of courting personal and
professional relations with the military intelligence communities. For
intellectuals trained at renowned universities, it is elementary
knowledge
that when you are for something, making the most of your talents in the
case
before us in the amiable, and undeniably often profitable relations to
the
military intelligence communities, then you cannot but be against its
opposite.
In this case the opposite happens to be defenceless, lonely civilians,
often
with very little education, the prey of flocks of prying vultures armed
with
billion-dollar budgets and the most advanced mind influencing,
dominating,
and torturing technologies available.
Mahlzeit !
The German peace researcher Ekkehart Krippendorff has the following to
say
about those of his colleagues who cultivate such close relationships:
"Sie
sind nicht bestochen, aber in einer subtilen Weise sind sie natürlich
bestochen, weil sie zum Establishment gehören und gehören wollen. - Das
ist
nicht eine finanzielle Frage, sondern eine subtilere Form von Nähe zur
Macht. - In dem Masse wie Friedensforschung in diesem Sinne
praxisorientiert
ist, also Einfluss haben will, ist sie verloren". 4) (They do not take
bribes - but in a subtle manner they are of course bribed, because they
belong to and want to belong to the establishment. - It is not a
financial
issue, but a more subtle form of being close to power. - In this sense,
to
the extent that peace research is practice oriented, i.e. wants to have
influence, it is lost).
By way of example, the attempt at considering the daily perpetrating
experts
from the military intelligence communities trustworthy sources, whom one
can
naturally rely on, led Bob Woodward (one of the Pulitzer prize winners
who
brought Watergate to light) to the absurd and disheartening position of
circulating through his book 'Veil: the Secret Wars of CIA', 5) the
intended
piece of disinformation below. This was planted by one of the 250 experts
from the intelligence community whom he unabashedly presents as  the main
sources for his book. Writing about the extremely advanced 'Lacrosse'
radar
satellite in 1987 Woodward frogmarches the reading public to stumble into
an
exciting 'future': "There was the possibility that sometime a future
('Lacrosse') system might see through buildings." At the time when
Woodward
wrote this, merged systems of earlier electronic intelligence satellites,
e.g. the 'Heavy Ferrets', 6) 7) and infrared technology had been applied
for
exactly this purpose - and to mind control - for approx. 25 years. In the
1960's, they had already achieved frightening effectiveness.
References:
1 Stonor Saunders, Frances: Who Paid the Piper ? The CIA and the Cultural
Cold War. London: Granta Books, 1999.
2 Begich, Nick and Manning, Jeane: HAARP Project. Vandalism in the Sky.
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6853/project008.html
3 Persinger, M.A.: On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human
Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms. Perceptual
and
Motor Skills, June 1995.
4 Quoted from: Krell, Gert: Die Intellektuellen und die Macht. Kritische
Anmerkungen zum Korruptionsvorwurf gegenüber der Politikwissenschaft und
der
Friedensforschung. In: Greven,  Thomas & Jarasch, Oliver: Für eine
lebendige
Wissenschaft des Politischen. Frankfurt:  Suhrkamp, 1999.
5 Woodward, Bob: Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA 1981-1987. London:
Headline Books, 1988.
6 Richelson, Jeffrey T.: The U.S. Intelligence Community. 2nd edition.
Cambridge: Ballinger, 1989.
7 Richelson, Jeffrey T.: The U.S. Intelligence Community. 3rd edition.
Boulder: Westview Press, 1995.
Richelson's book about the US Intelligence Community is one of the few
places in the civilian literature where the theme of sex is connected to
the
Heavy Ferrets. In the 1989 edition, he writes: "What is known is that the
code names for the satellites have had a common theme - they were all
named
after female sex symbols. Two of the satellites operating in the late
1970's
were code-named RAQUEL and FARRAH, while earlier satellites had been
code-named BRIDGET and MARILYN."
In the 1995 edition, this passage is deleted

 wrote in message
Q3ZM6.12659$jp1.9...@news.infostrada.it...


Almeno rafforzo il mio english.
Io lo mastico poco; mi spiegheresti che significa "quoting"?
-- 
Bitless - maur...@tXiYnZ.it
Remove XYZ for valid address

 Io lo mastico poco; mi spiegheresti che significa "quoting"?
: DD...pare che non lo sappia,
o almeno non come si applica, Bitless !! ; )
LUCE

LUCE ha scritto:

punti di vista 
a me pare che lo conosce benissimo.
Il messaggio c'era tutto con la regolari > (per me),
un esempio di chiarezza
e dopo la risposta, come di dovere.
Magari tutti facessereo cosi',
pago sempre con piacere la telecom,
tu immaginati il contrario,
potremmo perdere meriadoc
a.cara

potremmo perdere meriadoc
Non sia mai detto. Per evitare una tale
disgrazia sto connesso almeno 16 ore
al giorno, io...
