Newsgroup: it.discussioni.auto
Titolo: I pentiti dell'auto elettrica: in California uno su cinque rinuncia

https://www.repubblica.it/motori/sezioni/attualita/2021/05/04/news/auto_elettrica_a_volte_si_preferisce_tornare_indietro-299330463/
 
 
-- 
[CFWS]

 
https://www.repubblica.it/motori/sezioni/attualita/2021/05/04/news/auto_elettrica_a_volte_si_preferisce_tornare_indietro-299330463/
 
 
"Una quota (di pentiti, ndr) che, in basse allo studio, diventa ancora 
maggiore, raggiungendo circa il 21%, se l’auto elettrificata in 
questione è di tipo ibrido plug-in (Phev)"
 
ehm ehm... Zotto?
 

Francesco ha pensato forte :

lo vuoi far sbroccare? lol
 
-- 
[CFWS]

 
Bibì e Bibò:  Lo ho linkato IO 10 giorni fa
 
 

https://groups.google.com/g/it.discussioni.auto/c/V2dB-O3Ru14/m/8QI6zv9QAwAJ
 
 

Zotto T ha usato la sua tastiera per scrivere :

lol lol la lexus ibrida fa schifo...tiè!!
 
-- 
[CFWS]

 questione è di tipo ibrido plug-in (Phev)" 
 
a naso non hanno le condizioni per usare la plug-in, poca città e tanta statale e si trovano a guidare auto che vanno sempre a benza e ciucciano come idrovore.
la plug-in ha l'utilizzo ideale nel traffico cittadino se puoi farti bastare la carica casalinga. gli yankees son capaci di spararsi 50+50 km di autostrada solo per il tragitto casa-lavoro :)

 
 
Meno male, ce ne sono già in giro troppe! Va a finire che devo prendere una Elettrica cinese:
 
https://motori.virgilio.it/auto/sfida-auto-cinese-nio-sbarca-europa/162214/
 

Sembra che M C abbia detto :

Zotto dice  che c'è un carellino da rimorchiare con la lexus ibrida per 
aumentare l'autonomia di 30km
 
L'elettrico sta facendo passi da gigante
 
-- 
[CFWS]

 Elettrica cinese:
 
Lo so che questo ti farà male...non rientra neppure nelle prima 15
 
lol lol
 
-- 
[CFWS]

 L'elettrico sta facendo passi da gigante 
 
ecco, all'elettrica serve un bel carrello bi-asse, di quelli tosti, per caricarci un serbatoio da 500 litri e un generatore da 30 kw a nafta, di quelli da cantiere, se vuoi avere un po' più di autonomia ;P poi sai i video delle manovre su youtube, protagonisti auto + carrello e la pheega bionda ma se è mora fa lo stesso :-D

Scriveva M C domenica, 16/05/2021:

Lo devo mettere nel Daily...di questi tempi fa tanto figo
 
-- 
[CFWS]


Mei cojoni...

 
https://www.repubblica.it/motori/sezioni/attualita/2021/05/04/news/auto_elettrica_a_volte_si_preferisce_tornare_indietro-299330463/
 
 
Si vede che non avevano "due motori e per paura di non poter girare con uno 
rotto" (cit.) hanno rinunciato.
 
 
-- 
Alex
(JDM, 135, 50)
"Vags are for fags." 
 

 tragitto casa-lavoro :)
 
Oppure per "avere un secondo motore in caso di guasti." (cit.)



 
"Understanding discontinuance among California’s electric vehicle
  owners"  di Scott Hardman & Gil Tal
 
"Here, on the basis of results from five questionnaire surveys, we find
  that PEV discontinuance in California occurs at a rate of 20% for
  plug-in hybrid electric vehicle owners and 18% for battery electric
  vehicle owners."
 
Interessante, secondo gli anonimi di La Repubblica, 18% e 20% si
leggono 19% e 21% ... e' arrivata la velina di qualche inserzionista,
o financo una telefonata da uno dei palazzi, signor direttore ?
 
Un altra informazione utile, ma solo per chi e' intelligente:
 
"We use results from five questionnaire surveys to achieve this,
  conducted between 2015 and 2019. The first four surveys are cohort
  surveys of PEV owners; in the final survey respondents are recruited
  from the first four surveys."
 
Fino al 2019, Tesla non aveva veri concorrenti, il che spiega
il risultato "discriminato" tra felici proprietari di auto
Telsa e sconfortati proprietari di auto concorrenti.
 
E' questa e' solo una delle perle che ho notato di striscio
attingendo alla fonte. E l'ennesimo esempio che l'informazione
dei media nazionali e' taroccata. Non fidatevi, andate sempre
a verificare la fonte!!!
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pagina 1 (preview)
 
"For any new product to achieve a 100% market share, owners must
  make initial purchases, continue to purchase the technology and
  not revert back to purchasing the incumbent product whenever
  they replace their initial purchase or buy additional products.
  Plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs), which include battery electric
  vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), have a
  growing  market share in many nations. In California, the region of
  analysis in this study, PEVs reached 10% market share in 2019,
  whereas in Norway, the country with the largest PEV market share,
  the vehicles reached over 50% market share in 2019. California,
  Norway and several other nations have goals of reaching 100% of new
  vehicles sales being electric by 2025 (Norway), 2030 (Denmark, Ireland,
  India,  UK), 2035 (California) and 2040 (France)1. These goals will
  be more  difficult to achieve if PEV owners are discontinuing PEV
  ownership."
 
Most published research on PEV market penetration and con-
sumer choice focuses on initial adoption and characteristics of early
buyers. Discontinuance occurs when a BEV or PHEV owner no lon-
ger owns any PEV and now owns an internal combustion engine
vehicle or hybrid electric vehicle. To our knowledge, there are no
published reports on PEV discontinuance—that is, when an adopter
no longer owns or uses the technology that they originally adopted2.
IHS Markit has published data on electric vehicle loyalty, showing
that 55% of households who owned a new PEV purchased another
PEV in the last three months of 20183. This does not reveal anything
about discontinuance as those that did not purchase a PEV may or
may not own their original PEV.
Although the literature does not include studies on PEV discon-
tinuance, insights on who is buying PEVs, the barriers to adoption
and purchase motivations are still useful for this study. The factors
related to PEV adoption or non-adoption could be related to the
decision to continue or discontinue PEV ownership. We therefore
use insights from the literature to inform our study. Early studies
used stated preference methods with surveys of general popula-
tion to identify PEV adopters4–13. These studies typically found that
those most likely to purchase a PEV tended to be male and have
a high household income, a high level of education and multiple
vehicles in the household. More recent research gathered data from
consumers who had purchased a PEV. Studies in Sweden, Norway,
the United States and Canada are consistent in finding that PEV
owners are mostly male, middle aged with mid-to-high household
income and high education14–18. Several studies7,18–23 identified a
relationship between pro-environmental attitudes and positive per-
ceptions of PEVs. Having pro-technology attitudes is also related
to PEV adoption or adoption intent19,23, as is having preferences for
vehicles with higher efficiencies24.
Reasons for PEV purchase include environmental motiva-
tions25–31 and low running and ownership costs—especially related
to refuelling, but also to maintenance7,25,31,32. The high performance
and rapid acceleration of PEVs can be a purchase motivator30,33.
Reasons for adoption also include wanting to be the first to adopt a
new technology or novelty seeking26,30,31, which is related to having
pro-technology attitudes. PEV buyers are also encouraged to buy
the vehicles through direct incentives such as grants, rebates and tax
credits34, and indirect incentives such as free or discounted parking,
access to bus or carpool lanes and toll fee waivers35.
Studies on barriers to PEV adoption find some combination of
purchase price, driving range, model availability and lack of infra-
structure is the most substantial barrier to adoption5,29,36–42. Some
suggest limited driving range is the largest barrier5,40, whereas others
suggest is it purchase price37,39 or the availability of charging43.
The aim of this study is to understand why PEV owners in
California are discontinuing PEV ownership. We use results from
five questionnaire surveys to achieve this, conducted between 2015
and 2019. The first four surveys are cohort surveys of PEV own-
ers; in the final survey respondents are recruited from the first four
surveys. We construct logistic regression models to assess the cor-
relation of various factors with the decision to discontinue owner-
ship of a BEV or PHEV (see Methods). In this study we find that
discontinuance occurs at a rate of 18.1% for BEV owners and 20.1%
for PHEV owners. Discontinuance is correlated with having fewer
vehicles in the household and dissatisfaction with the convenience
of charging for both BEV and PHEV owners. BEV discontinuance is
correlated with owning other household vehicles with lower energy
efficiencies and not having level-2 charging at home. PHEV dis-
continuance is also correlated with not being male, not living in a
detached house, being dissatisfied with the purchase price of the
PHEV but being satisfied with running costs, shorter commute dis-
tances and undertaking more long-distance trips.
Understanding discontinuance among California’s
electric vehicle owners
Scott Hardman  ✉  and Gil Tal 
For the market share of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) to continue to 
grow and reach 100% of new vehicle sales, adopters of
the technology, who initially buy PEVs, will need to continue choosing 
them in subsequent purchases. Although much research
has focused on the reasons for, and barriers to, initial PEV purchase, 
less has been devoted to the reasons for discontinuance—
abandoning a new technology after first purchasing it. Here, on the 
basis of results from five questionnaire surveys, we find
that PEV discontinuance in California occurs at a rate of 20% for 
plug-in hybrid electric vehicle owners and 18% for battery
electric vehicle owners. We show that discontinuance is related to 
dissatisfaction with the convenience of charging, having
other vehicles in the household that are less efficient, not having 
level 2 (240-volt) charging at home, having fewer household
vehicles and not being male.
NATURE ENERGY | 
www.nature.com/natureenergy
 
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved

gli yankees son capaci di spararsi 50+50 km di autostrada solo per il tragitto casa-lavoro :)
 
eh si, solo loro... :P

 rotto" (cit.) hanno rinunciato. 
 
da 1 a 100 sei bastardo 100000? :D

 eh si, solo loro... :P
 
me asino :) m'è saltato 2 volte "1" ;P

 da 1 a 100 sei bastardo 100000? :D
 
Poi se avessero un cane sarebbero spacciati.


 Poi se avessero un cane sarebbero spacciati.
 
no. se non è incontinente :) regge almeno 2 cariche.
se ha la vescica di ferro pure 3 ;P casomai il problema sono i bambini che ne hanno sempre una e la moglie che dopo aver dato istruzioni di guida in continuazione a voce alta per superare la radio che inutilmente tieni sparata deve bagnarsi la gola secca ;P

 no. se non è incontinente :) regge almeno 2 cariche.
 
Parlavo di denunce (cit.).
