Newsgroup: it.fan.musica.de-andre
Titolo: [OT] Facciamo causa a Telecom

Da quando ho accettato la loro offerta per Alice 7Mb (si perché sono 
stati loro ad invitarmi per non cedere alle lusinghe di altri 
operatori...), la mia connessione in download è diventata + lenta che 
mai e per quel che ne so, tutti gli utenti in Italia sono messi come me, 
perciò si può parlare di una truffa bella e buona, alla quale *i 
furbetti* pongono rimedio solo per qualche ora al giorno, quando la 
connessione arriva, quando ci arriva, a 3~4 Mb che peraltro sono giusto 
la metà di quelli promessi.
Qualcuno ha dimestichezza in queste faccende? Dobbiamo fare *numero* per 
spaventarli, per cui, "internettuali di tutta Italia, unitevi!" ;)
...io intanto per non sbagliare, ho scritto al Beppe nazionale... ;)
Bye
-- 
	  "You look different every time you come
	         From the foam-crested brine
	   Your skin shining softly in the moonlight
       Partly fish, partly porpoise, partly baby sperm whale
	    Am I yours? Are you mine to play with?..."
 
robert...@tin.it
 ©2007
________________________________________________________________________



> ...io intanto per non sbagliare, ho scritto al Beppe nazionale... ;)
Non serve a una cippa.
Come non servirebbe a un'altra cippa qualunque azioni intendessi 
intraprendere.
Tu hai sottoscritto un contratto che non obbliga il tuo operatore (come 
il mio, Infostrada) a nessuna velocità precisa.
Quel "fino a 4 mega" (o 7, 8 o 20 che siano) l'hai accettato con la tua 
firma per cui se avessi voluto delle certezze avresti dovuto 
sottoscrivere un contratto con operatori seri (vedi Ngi) che, per 
contratto, garantiscono almeno una velocità minima.
Ciao ciao.

thing when prolonged
familiarity with vicious conditions leads to such lack of discernment
as to a man's true character, even among the best portion of a
community. We do not wish such a state of things as this in America.
California does not lack in excellent laws (as they read, in the
Statute Book), for the suppression of prostitution. There are laws
against procuring; against trading in Oriental women for evil
purposes; against buying or selling a female, with or without her
consent, for prostitution; against a husband forcing or influencing a
wife to lead an evil life; against a husband even consenting to his
wife practicing prostitution; against keeping a house of ill-fame; and
against knowingly renting a house for a place of prostitution. But all
these laws, almost the world over, as well as in California, are weak
at one point, namely, that they provide for imprisonment _or_ fine,
whereas they should provide for imprisonment _and_ fine. This is not
because the penalty would then be heavier, of necessity, but in order
that the law may not be prostituted into license. The alternative of
a fine 

prosecuting
and judicial powers. He probably also induced the woman on Government
money to commit adultery with him. Then as the judge he would
confiscate the money again, and give her a fine of fifty dollars
instead. We wonder if he likewise gave himself a "substantial award
from the bench," as the Registrar General was accustomed to give other
informers when they succeeded in getting evidence sufficient for
conviction. It is noticed by the Commission that one woman this same
year escaped by the roof at the peril of her life. No one knows how
many more may have done the same.
An inspector, Peterson, and a constable, Rylands, each induced women
on the street to accept money of them, and these women were punished
as prostitutes in hiding and not registered. Two prosecutions during
this same year are mentioned as having been instituted from malice.
One woman jumped from her window and severely injured herself, trying
to escape Inspector Douglass. One woman dared to assault an informer
who was after he