Newsgroup: it.sport.formula1.moderato
Titolo: Anatema

Si possano seccare le palle a tutti coloro che scriveranno ancora di 
Jerez 97, Suzuka 89-90 et similia.

 Jerez 97, Suzuka 89-90 et similia.
Si puň parlare del podio di Imola 94 ? BTW, io ho trovato il DIVX del GP,
perň manca il podio, anche se c'č il giro d'onore... e credo di aver
intravisto, tra le due partenze, Schumacher che rideva e raccontava
barzellette con i meccanici...
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 (o_        Vinci                     registered Linux User #276630
 //\         " Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent "
 V_/_                     Salvor Hardin, Foundation

 
No, secca le palle pure quello, occhio!

 No, secca le palle pure quello, occhio!
E della malvagità intrinseca e dell'immoralità di Schumacher ? Insomma,
se mi si taglia anche questo, posso andare in letargo per l'inverno, tanto
i tempi delle prove mica servono a molto, ed anche la discussione sulla
Ferrari ed i regolamenti mi pare piuttosto ripetitiva, ormai... :-))))


 
ma infatti, ma chi te lo fa fare... ;-)
Dedicati ad altro, no? io ho ripreso con gli scacchi, ottimo sport 
invernale :-)

 ancora di Jerez 97, Suzuka 89-90 et similia.
Beh, allora io sono tranquillo... ho già tre figli e posso
dirmi soddisfatto sotto quell'aspetto... :-)))
A proposito di Adelaide 1994, volevo far notare che... [snip]
Ciao.
Mauro

 
allora ti si secca la lingua, cosi' tua moglie deve proprio rivolgersi 
altrove... :-P

 Jerez 97, Suzuka 89-90 et similia.
volevo aggiungere qualcosa su Spa '98...
-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - 
http://www.Mailgate.ORG

 invernale :-)
Troppo cerebrale... :-)))


 Jerez 97, Suzuka 89-90 et similia.
Stai scherzando? Le discussioni su Jerez, Suzuka e company sono come il
Natale, una tradizione che nel mese di dicembre non può essere trascurata...
--
P#R
Rimuovi FOREVER per rispondere in e-mail

"The
   Ancient Engineers," Ballentine edition, page 17.
 
   The lives of the three bank clerks are not IDENTICAL. Ideology does
   have SOME effect. But all technological societies, in order to
   survive, must evolve along APPROXIMATELY the same trajectory.
 
   19. (Paragraph 123) Just think an irresponsible genetic engineer might
   create a lot of terrorists.
 
   20. (Paragraph 124) For a further example of undesirable consequences
   of medical progress, suppose a reliable cure for cancer is discovered.
   Even if the treatment is too expensive to be available to any but the
   elite, it will greatly reduce their incentive to stop the escape of
   carcinogens into the environment.
 
   21. (Paragraph 128) Since many people may find paradoxical the notion
   that a large number of good things can add up to a bad thing, we will
   illustrate with an analogy. Suppose Mr. A is playing chess with Mr. B.
   Mr. C, a Grand Master, is looking over Mr. A's shoulder. Mr. A of
   course wants to win his game, so if Mr. C points out a good move for
   him to make, he is doing Mr. A a favor. But suppose now that Mr. C
   tells Mr. A how to make ALL of his moves. In each particular instance
   he does Mr. A a favor by showing him his best move, but by making ALL
   of his moves for hi

sense of power by developing fighting skills
   that he is quite content to use in blind obedience to his superiors).
 
   44. But for most people it is through the power process-having a goal,
   making an AUTONOMOUS effort and attaining t the goal-that self-esteem,
   self-confidence and a sense of power are acquired. When one does not
   have adequate opportunity to go throughout the power process the
   consequences are (depending on the individual and on the way the power
   process is disrupted) boredom, demoralization, low self-esteem,
   inferiority feelings, defeatism, depression, anxiety, guilt,
   frustration, hostility, spouse or child abuse, insatiable hedonism,
   abnormal sexual behavior, sleep disorders, eating disorders, etc. [6]
 
  SOURCES OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS
 
 
 
   45. Any of the foregoing symptoms can occur in any society, but in
   modern industrial society they are present on a massive scale. We
   aren't the first to mention that the world today seems to be going
   crazy. This sort of thing is not normal for human societies. There is
   good reason to believe that primitive man suffered from less stress
   and frustration and was better satisfied with his way 

an elevated death rate, or a
   declining birth rate or something else, so that either the society
   breaks down, or its functioning becomes too inefficient and it is
   (quickly or gradually, through conquest, attrition or evolution)
   replaces by some more efficient form of society.
 
   [25]
 
   144. Thus human nature has in the past put certain limits on the
   development of societies. People coud be pushed only so far and no
   farther. But today this may be changing, because modern technology is
   developing way of modifying human beings.
 
   145. Imagine a society that subjects people to conditions that amke
   them terribley unhappy, then gives them the drugs to take away their
   unhappiness. Science fiction? It is already happening to some extent
   in our own society. It is well known that the rate of clinical
   depression had been greatly increasing in recent decades. We believe
   that this is due to disruption fo the power process, as explained in
   paragraphs 59-76. But even if we are wrong, the increasing rate of
   depression is certainly the result of SOME conditions that exist in
   today's society. Instead of removing the conditions that make people
   depressed, modern society gives them antidepressant drugs. In effect,
   antidepressants area a means of modifying an individual's internal
   state in such a way as to enable him to toelrate social conditions
   that he would otherwise find intolerable. (Yes, we know that
   depression is often of purely genetic origin. We are referring here to
   those cases in which environment plays th

man; instead, they want to preserve African American culture. But in
   what does this preservation of African American culture consist? It
   can hardly consist in anything more than eating black-style food,
   listening to black-style music, wearing black-style clothing and going
   to a black-style church or mosque. In other words, it can express
   itself only in superficial matters. In all ESSENTIAL respects more
   leftists of the oversocialized type want to make the black man conform
   to white, middle-class ideals. They want to make him study technical
   subjects, become an executive or a scientist, spend his life climbing
   the status ladder to prove that black people are as good as white.
   They want to make black fathers "responsible." they want black gangs
   to become nonviolent, etc. But these are exactly the values of the
   industrial-technological system. The system couldn't care less what
   kind of music a man listens to, what kind of clothes he wears or what
   religion he believes in as long as he studies in school, holds a
   respectable job, climbs the status ladder, is a "responsible" parent,
   is nonviolent and so forth. In effect, however much he may deny it,
   the oversocialized leftist wants to integrate the black man into the
   system

-cut
   material advantages, whereas freedom is an abstraction that means
   different things to different people, and its loss is easily obscured
   by propaganda and fancy talk.
 
   139. And note this important difference: It is conceivable that our
   environmental problems (for example) may some day be settled through a
   rational, comprehensive plan, but if this happens it will be only
   because it is in the long-term interest of the system to solve these
   problems. But it is NOT in the interest of the system to preserve
   freedom or small-group autonomy. On the contrary, it is in the
   interest of the system to bring human behavior under control to the
   greatest possible extent. Thus, while practical considerations may
   eventually force the system to take a rational, prudent approach to
   environmental problems, equally practical considerations will force
   the system to regulate human behavior ever more closely (preferably by
   indirect means that will disguise the encroachment on freedom.) This
   isn't just our opinion. Eminent social scientists (e.g. James Q.
   Wilson) have stressed the importance of "socializing" people more
   effectively.
 
  REVOLUTION IS EASIER THAN REF