Newsgroup: it.sport.formula1.moderato
Titolo: [ENG] What are the Nine Teams up to now?

Source: 
grandprix.com
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns14463.html
While everyone watches the High Court in London to see what will emerge
in the supposed "settlement" between Bernie Ecclestone and the Formula 1
banks, the Formula 1 teams continue their discussions about the future
with a basic structure having been established to enable the participants
to define the basis on which the parties involved are willing to compete
in a new championship beyond the end of 2007.
It has been an open secret for some time that the GPWC moniker would have
to go and there is now speculation that the manufacturers want a new name
in order to leave behind the negative connotations of the GPWC. The name
will reflect the fact that the original GPWC survivors (BMW, Mercedes and
Renault) will be joined by Honda and Toyota in the new organization.
There are reports that this might be a name such as "Grand Prix Racing"
but as far as we understand the situation at the moment is that there is
no decision yet.
There have been some reports about the structure of the various
committees involved but these have not been entirely correct. At the
centre of the structure is a what is known as the team principals forum.
We believe that this will expand soon to include the manufacturers as
well. At the moment this body is being chaired by Nick Fry of BAR-Honda
and is fed by four committees, each dealing with different aspects of the
sport.
The Sporting Committee is chaired by David Ryan (McLaren) and Alistair
Watkins (BAR). There is a Technical Committee which is chaired by Patrick
Head (Williams), attached to this is a sub-group associated with engines.
There is a Media Committee which is headed by Liam Clogger (Williams) and
there is also a Legal Committee which is chaired by John Healey, the
in-house lawyer at Williams.
The current phase of development is to discuss the fundamental structures
which need to be put in place for the future and the teams are keen to
point out that it does not in any way exclude the involvement of the
Formula One group nor the FIA. There are, however, some fundamental
premises which must be accepted in order for there to be a deal with
these parties and with Ferrari. It is not clear how many of these there
are but one is very definitely that Ferrari cannot be allowed to have a
veto on technical regulations, which appears to be part of the Concorde
Agreement which was announced back in February. There are certainly
questions over how the income of F1 is distributed. A third proviso is
probably how the rules are created (as opposed to how they are
administered) and there may also be questions about the appeals process.
Copyright 1988-2005, Inside F1, Inc.
-- 
Automatically gathered from the web
Subscribe/unsubscribe/info at
http://www.grandprixpassion.com/mailman/listinfo/webnews

 Agreement which was announced back in February.
Oh oh! Se č vero (*se* č vero, sottolineo) veramente Ferrari e
Ecclestone non hanno piů vergogna.
-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini            
ale...@sevenseas.org
"Sono uomini e donne, piroscafi e bandiere..."

 Ecclestone non hanno piů vergogna.
*Se* č vero, č una mossa geniale! Praticamente rinunciando a quella 
clausola lě Ferrari puň ottenere molto di piů che non avendola a priori.
Geniale, semplicemente geniale!
ivan
-- 
By 1977 or so, PLATO was featuring real-time multiplayer dungeon games, 
not to mention real-time spacewar, IM, chat, email, netnews, and a host of 
other things we now take for granted. All this on high-resolution plasma 
panel terminals connected at 1200 baud to twin Cyber 6600 supercomputer. 
Now you understand why I was kicked out of Cornell for a year; PLATO was 
crack for computer nerds. (Robert Woodhead, co-creator of Wizardry)

 priori.
Ho il sospetto che Ferrari dovrà rinunciare ad un bel po' di cose, se non 
vorrà correre da sola
Che, visti i chiari di luna recenti, non sarebbe neanche una cattivissima 
idea
-- 
Fluoredshift - 
http://www.bloggers.it/filippofilippini/
Maserati MC12 - richiede deroga a FIA ed altri team - concessa
Minardi 2005 - richiede deroga a FIA ed altri team - Ferrari gliela nega
Schumacher ha vinto sette campionati - Furino ne ha vinti otto 

 Geniale, semplicemente geniale!
Mi sfugge la logica della tua affermazione .........