Newsgroup: it.sport.formula1.moderato
Titolo: Calendario 2005

  * March 6 Australia 
  * March 20 Malaysia 
  * April 3 Bahrain 
  * April 24 San Marino 
  * May 8 Spain 
  * May 22 Monaco 
  * May 29 Europe 
  * June 12 Canada 
  * June 19 United States 
  * July 3 France 
  * July 10 Britain 
  * July 24 Germany 
  * July 31 Hungary 
  * August 21 Turkey 
  * September 4 Italy 
  * September 11 Belgium 
  * September 25 Brazil 
  * October 9 Japan 
  * October 16 China 
-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini            
ale...@sevenseas.org
"Sono uomini e donne, piroscafi e bandiere..."

  * October 16 China
Però, scusa, Francia, S. Marino e Inghilterra non sono ancora da confermara?
Thorak
Fidder #36
"Coloro che sognano di giorno sanno molte cose che sfuggono a chi sogna
soltanto di notte.
E. A. Poe" 


Sevenseas.org Hacking Community

 Confermate ieri, questo è il calendario definitivo. 19 gare, sissignori.
L'ho letto poco dopo sul giornale, comunque grazie.


material
   acquisition serves their need for the power process. But it does not
   necessarily follow that their need is fully satisfied. They may have
   insufficient autonomy in the power process (their work may consist of
   following orders) and some of their drives may be frustrated (e.g.,
   security, aggression). (We are guilty of oversimplification in
   paragraphs 80-82 because we have assumed that the desire for material
   acquisition is entirely a creation of the advertising and marketing
   industry. Of course it's not that simple.
 
   83. Some people partly satisfy their need for power by identifying
   themselves with a powerful organization or mass movement. An
   individual lacking goals or power joins a movement or an organization,
   adopts its goals as his own, then works toward these goals. When some
   of the goals are attained, the individual, even though his personal
   efforts have played only an insignificant part in the attainment of
   the goals, feels (through his identification with the movement or
   organization) as if he had gone through the power process. This
   phenomenon was exploited by the fascists, nazis and communists. Our
   society uses it, too, though less crudely. Example: Manuel Noriega was
   an irritant to the U.S. (goal: punish Noriega). The U.S. invaded
   Panama (effort) and punished Noriega (attai

more likely to break down. Look at Cuba.
 
   196. Revolutionaries might consider favoring measures that tend to
   bind the world economy into a unified whole. Free trade agreements
   like NAFTA and GATT are probably harmful to the environment in the
   short run, but in the long run they may perhaps be advantageous
   because they foster economic interdependence between nations. I will
   be eaier to destroy the industrial system on a worldwide basis if he
   world economy is so unified that its breakdown in any on major nation
   will lead to its breakdwon in al industrialized nations.
 
   the long run they may perhaps be advantageous because they foster
   economic interdependence between nations. It will be easier to destroy
   the industrial system on a worldwide basis if the world economy is so
   unified that its breakdown in any one major nation will lead to its
   breakdown in all industrialized nations.
 
   197. Some people take the line that modern man has too much power, too
   much control over nature; the

rights, but
   when these conflict with their work, they usually feel that their work
   is more important.
 
   132. It is well known that people generally work better and more
   persistently when striving for a reward than when attempting to avoid
   a punishment or negative outcome. Scientists and other technicians are
   motivated mainly by the rewards they get through their work. But those
   who oppose technilogiccal invasions of freedom are working to avoid a
   negative outcome, consequently there are a few who work persistently
   and well at this discouraging task. If reformers ever achieved a
   signal victory that seemed to set up a solid barrier against further
   erosion of freedom through technological progress, most would tend to
   relax and turn their attention to more agreeable pursuits. But the
   scientists would remain busy in their laboratories, and technology as
   it progresses would find ways, in spite of any barriers, to exert more
   and more control over individuals and make them always more dependent
   on the system.
 
   133. No social arrangements, whether laws,

methods or both. In the future, social systems
   will not be adjusted to suit the needs of human beings. Instead, human
   being will be adjusted to suit the needs of the system.
 
   [27] 152. Generally speaking, technological control over human
   behavior will probably not be introduced with a totalitarian intention
   or even through a conscious desire to restrict human freedom. [28]
   Each new step in the assertion of control over the human mind will be
   taken as a rational response to a problem that faces society, such as
   curing alcoholism, reducing the crime rate or inducing young people to
   study science and engineering. In many cases, there will be
   humanitarian justification. For example, when a psychiatrist
   prescribes an anti-depressant for a depressed patient, he is clearly
   doing that individual a favor. It would be inhumane to withhold the
   drug from someone who needs it. When parents send their children to
   Sylvan Learning Centers to have them manipulated into becoming
   enthusiastic about their studies, they do so from concern for their
   children's welfare. It may be that some of these parents wish that one
   didn't have to have specialized training to get a job and that their
   kid didn't have to be brainwash