Newsgroup: it.discussioni.misteri
Titolo: R:L'uomo di Mouillans (cut & paste)

 umane conosciute) la meno simile alle scimmie !!!
Beh, oddio, questo concetto di modernita' mi sconvolge non poco, mi pare una
trasposizione, neppure troppo raffinata, del nostro concetto di modernita',
anche in senso estetico, nei confronti dei quell'umanoide.
Saluti.
--
-----
§  L'uomo puo' credere all'impossibile, non credera' mai all'improbabile. -
O.Wilde
-----
                                 ^^SpAwN^^
[e-mail: togliere NOSPAM dall'indirizzo]

 Publishing corp. nel 1977 ...
Ho fatto una rapida ricerca in rete.
L'uomo di Mouillans esiste SOLO a questo indirizzo:
http://www.biblerevelations.org/antichrist/nogod03.htm
Il sito, 
http://www.biblerevelations.org/
, manco a dirlo, e' il tipico sito
creazionista-complottista
Si afferma, fra le altre cose:
*******
"The skull capacity (with its inferred brain size) of Cro-Magnon man was at
least equal to, and sometimes superior to our own. Neanderthal (‘Stone Age’)
man had an appreciably larger cranium (1,600 cubic centimeters) than that of
modern man.
The cranial capacity of ancient man in Morocco (called ‘Mouillans’ by
anthropologists) measured an average of 2,000 cubic centimeters, compared to
modern man’s cranial size of about 1,400 cubic centimeters. This suggests
that the downward spiral of intellectual capacity began soon after the
Deluge.
Mankind today is no more intelligent than he was a thousand years ago, but
we have accumulated more technology. We have the accumulated knowledge of
the past, upon which we can draw and make improvements.
Most people would be shocked if they knew that a general regression is
likewise evident in a good many species, both in the vegetable and animal
kingdoms.
Agassiz was one of the first to observe that in many instances the fish of
extinct species were better developed and appeared ‘more advanced’ than
later species, the modern included. Agassiz spoke as an authority in his
field. Many better developed mammals likewise became extinct. Similar
observations have been made regarding practically all of today’s life forms.
While the fossil record presents better developed specimens than those new
living, another feature—larger size—has been observed in association. This
is a blow to the evolutionary concept. ‘Cope’s Law’ presumed that the
evolutionary series would show increase in improvement and size as time went
on.
Darwin found himself at a loss to explain how ‘now we find mere pigmies
compared with the antecedent allied races.’ Today’s animals were once
larger, like sheep, which were as big as horses.
In Nairobi, museum director Richard Leakey showed off an ancient skeleton of
a twelve-year old boy. Commenting on widely held scientific beliefs that man
’s ancestors were smaller than modern man, Leakey said: ‘This specimen
confirms early hints that Homo erectus individuals were fully as tall as
modern people. We can now ask if many modern populations are smaller than
their early ancestors and if so why?’
Dr. Louis Burkhatter said the ‘existence of gigantic human beings (in the
past) must be considered as a scientifically assured fact.’ On every
continent are uncovered not only artifacts, but footprints, skulls and
skeletons of humans who far exceeded us in stature.
These are well documented. In fact, a fresh look at the fossils led
Weidenreich, of Manhattan’s American Museum of Natural History, to the
belief that ‘gigantism and massiveness may have been a general or at least a
widespread character of early mankind.’ This supports the Genesis line that
‘there were giants in those days.’
Some argue that large size would be inefficient due to gravitational
factors, but this is not true. The basic characteristics of gravity still
elude analysis by modern physics. A number of scientists now believe that
electromagnetic energy supersedes the orthodox laws of gravity.
Larger size may have been to man’s best advantage. There is scientific
reason to believe that gigantic size and long life go together. The body
cells become lighter, the blood moves more freely, there is less fatigue and
the body wears out more slowly.
The concept of an era when mankind lived longer does persist in the memory
of most races. And scientific research in several countries suggests that
life spans of several centuries are possible under certain conditions, a
combination of factors such as apparently obtained before the Deluge. MAN
WAS ONCE A HIGHER, SUPERIOR BEING—CERTAINLY NOT A SPECIES OF THE MONKEY
FAMILY. We are only a shade of the original man.
We live today in a zoologically impoverished world. The fossil remains show
that in the past, plants and animals alike were, 1) more widely distributed;
2) of greater variety; and, 3) greater in both size and quality. Humans
likewise were superior, even to living longer. Physical degeneration, and
not evolutionary improvement is the story of life on this planet. You might
say, like a clock once wound up, but now running down.
****
Faro' altre ricerche
Poi ho bazzicato sul sito 
http://www.talkorigins.org
 , il top al riguardo,
e:
- nessuna citazione dell'uomo di mouillans
- nessuna citazione del Dr. Dreman (che pare non esistere su tutto il Web)
- nessuna citazione sulla Capeto University (ugualmente inesistente su
tutto il Web, ed e' strano per una universita')
- quanto ad Arthur Keith, famoso paleontologo, mai e' messo in relazione
con l'uomo di Mouillans, ma semmai con l'uomo di Wadjak (Java), la cui
vicenda ricorda, nella immancabile pretestuosa polemica messa su dai
creazionisti, quella dell'uomo di mouillans.
Certo, la rete non e' tutto, ma se non c'e' traccia su talkorigins, si puo'
propendere per la bufala, in tutta franchezza, salvo prove contrarie
E questo perche':
****
Talk.origins is a Usenet newsgroup devoted to the discussion and debate of
biological and physical origins. Most discussions in the newsgroup center on
the creation/evolution controversy, but other topics of discussion include
the origin of life, geology, biology, catastrophism, cosmology and theology.
This archive is a collection of articles and essays, most of which have
appeared in talk.origins at one time or another. The primary reason for this
archive's existence is to provide mainstream scientific responses to the
many frequently asked questions (FAQs) and frequently rebutted assertions
that appear in talk.origins.
****
Saluti


circa cento inumazioni....
è troppo chiederti da dove hai tratto queste informazioni?
sai, il coverup degli scienziati cattivi
(più probabilmente la mia grande ignoranza)
mi avevano completamente nascosto l'esistenza dell'uomo di Mouillans.
ciao
Giancarlo

>


 


 


Meditate gente, meditate .....


 


Christian Hamnett - 
go...@tin.it
 


 


 


 



>>>>>>>
Eh, considerando anche la chiusura della citazione che immancabilmente agita
lo spauracchio dell'invisibile complotto (veramente una costante universale
di ogni ciarlataneria che si rispetti), medito motlo sulla veridicita' di
quello che quel lilro riporta.
Spero in una rispsota si talk.origins, che e' moderato
Saluti.
