Newsgroup: it.discussioni.misteri
Titolo: e vediamo come meberbs svicola

from: 
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=43756.40#lastPost
 
 
 
@meberbs
 
In   
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.205.6223&rep=rep1&type=pdf
 
We read: 
“In 1901 Poincaré found another weakness in displacement current theory. He showed
that when the displacement current is acted on by a magnetic field it ‘does not experience
any mechanical action according to the theory of Lorentz’….”
 
However, the real problem is that trying to find the magnetic field of DC was in practice the salvation for the invention of Maxwell called precisely DC since the magnetic fields that as a false procedure can be attributed to DC save precisely the invention of Maxwell of the DC. 
In reality, as Poincarè wanted, we need to look for the true and unequivocal clue: the Lorentz force that the magnetic field from DC generates in the presence of a current.
 
Now Poincare says that there is no mechanical action according to the theory of Lorentz ', Miller that you degrades to incompetent says that no one has found the magnetic field from DC between the plates of a capacitor. I add myself to Poincarè and Miller with 2 photos of my attempt to find that force between the 3 plates of a condenser 
http://www.calmagorod.org/pnn-la-sua-genesi/
 
In conclusion you should find an article where someone found the Lorentz force between the plates of a condenser OR IN OTHER PLACE due to the magnetic field from DC. 
You can not be allowed to give incompetence and crackpots to everyone without showing at least one example of DC magnetic field thrust for more than 140 years!
 
I would be happy that a maxwellist could prove that the magnetic field from DC exists and can boost. It would give proof that what I wrote in
http://www.calmagorod.org/
 could lead to a propellantless propulsion from Maxwell DC.
 
The comic thing that you evoke all the possible mathematical chatter (for example Liénard-Wiechert potentials and Jefimenko's equations) to avoid any experimental test that can close the question related to the mechanical action that the fatal magnetic field from DC.
 
And look what we read that we read in honor of Lorentz for the award of the Nobel
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincitori_del_premio_Nobel_per_la_fisica
 
 
 …In certain respects however Maxwell's theory of light was inadequate, in that it left individual phenomena unexplained. The greatest credit for the further development of the electromagnetic theory of light is due to Professor Lorentz, whose theoretical work on this subject has borne the richest fruit. While Maxwell's theory is free from any assumptions of an atomistic nature, Lorentz starts from the hypothesis that in matter extremely small particles, called electrons, are the carriers of certain specific charges. These electrons move freely in so-called conductors and thus produce an electrical current, whereas in non-conductors their movement is apparent through electrical resistance. ...


https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/assets/43756.0/1499779.jpg
 
 
La pizza PNN 


al titanato di bario
 
e lallo


dev'essere il dielettrico


mescolato con resina epossidica


dovrebbe formare una schiuma appiccicosa e anche abbastanza tossica
 
e lallo


il prototipo viene immerso nella vascha di schiuma, oppure con uno spray

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:17:44 +0000, Ottone wrote:
 

e' una pizza bianca
 
senza pummarola n'goppa

 
 
Certo stai prendendo schiaffoni a due mani dall'inzio del thread pero' lui 
svicolera' :-D scrivilo in altri 10-15 post e diventerà vero.
 
-- 
Federico
 
https://www.facebook.com/fedegatsu
 
https://www.facebook.com/SBItalysrl?ref=hl
 
http://www.sbitaly.it/it/
 
 

 svicolera' :-D scrivilo in altri 10-15 post e diventerà vero.
 
confondi i tuoi falsari e falliti desiderata con una SUPER inkulata :-)
 
meberbs come voi non fa esperimenti ....riporta solo bicazzole a suo parere consolidate
e
l'inkulata ke non si inkulavano la pnn pesava poco fa 20562 fegati tuo e di sarkofagassen
 
e lallo
 
 

 la pnn pesava poco fa 20562
 
Ecchilo, ha ricominciato a farsi le pippe coi contatori, o meglio, con
i contatori delle sghignazzate che si fa il mondo intero andandosi a
leggere le fesserie che ha scritto in quel thread mentre annaspava
facendo sempre più la figura del ciarlatano
 
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=43756.40
 
 
ROTFL !!!
 
 

 electric field, and there is a magnetic field that exists exactly as predicted.
 
Then it is an additional mystery that we can not use the magnetic field from DC for the 
Lorentz force
 
riPETO
 
Then it is an additional mystery that we can not use the magnetic field from DC for the 
Lorentz force
 
 
Then it is an additional mystery that we can not use the magnetic field from DC for the 
Lorentz force
 
 
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=43756.40#lastPost
 

 mi brucia il kulo
 
Si vede, Emidio, si vede
 
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=43756.40
 
 
ROTFL
 


fallito non mi scoppiare prima della divulgazione del know-how della pnn nel 2017 si intende :-)
 
e lallo









