Newsgroup: it.hobby.scacchi
Titolo: I Software sono solo tattici (Kramnik-DeepJunior)

Vi allego questo gioiellino di partita (purtroppo i simboli scacchistici
come ! e ? sono stati tradotti in altri caratteri come $ etc.
Le note sono del GM Israeliano Alexander Finkel.
[[Event "Dortmund SuperGM"]
[Site "Dortmund"]
[Date "2000.07.12"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Kramnik, Vladimir"]
[Black "Comp Deep Junior"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D00"]
[WhiteElo "2770"]
[Annotator "Finkel,A"]
[PlyCount "65"]
[EventDate "2000.07.07"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2000.10.18"]
1. d4 1... d5 2. e3 $1 {The exclaimaition mark is not for the strength of
the
move itself,if we would want to do this the ?! mark would be more
suitable,but
we must not forget that the game was played against the computer,that's why
this move deviating from long theoretical variations and keeping the
position 
closed is ideal weapon against it.} 2... Nf6 3. Bd3 e6 4. f4 Be7 5. Nf3 c5
6.
c3 O-O $6 (6... Nc6 7. O-O O-O 8. Nbd2 Ng4 9. Qe1 f5 10. b3 Nf6 11. Bb2 b6
12.
Ne5 Nxe5 13. fxe5 Ne4 14. Nxe4 fxe4 15. Rxf8+ Qxf8 $11 {
Leiskau,R-Keuth,G/Bruchkoebel MVT 1993}) 7. Nbd2 Ng4 $6 {The following
idea is
typical ''computar chess''.I think that player of master strength would
never
come up with such an antipositional idea,while we are taking about the
computer program,whose playing strength is about 2700!Black closes the
center
giving white an opportunity to deveop the attack without any effort or
counterplay.} (7... b6 8. Qe2 (8. Ne5 Ba6 9. Nc6 Qc7 10. Nxe7+ Qxe7 11.
Bxa6
Nxa6 $11) 8... Bb7 9. Ne5 Qc8 10. a4 $5 Ba6 11. Bb5 Bxb5 12. axb5 a6 $11)
8.
Qe2 c4 $6 9. Bc2 f5 10. Rg1 $14 Nc6 11. h3 Nf6 12. g4 Ne4 $6 (12... b5 $5
13.
Qg2 g6 14. Ng5 $1 (14. gxf5 $6 exf5 15. Nh4 Kf7 16. Ndf3 Ke8 $13) 14...
Qe8 $1
(14... Ne4 $6 15. h4 b4 16. gxf5 exf5 17. Ndxe4 dxe4 18. Nxh7 $1 $18)
(14... b4
$2 15. Nxc4 $1 $16) (14... Bd7 $2 15. gxf5 exf5 16. Nxh7 $1 $18) 15. Ndf3
b4 (
15... h6 16. Nxe6 Bxe6 17. gxf5 Bf7 18. fxg6 $16) 16. Bd2 $36) 13. Qg2 g6
14.
Qh2 Kh8 15. h4 Nxd2 (15... fxg4 16. Nxe4 gxf3 17. Ng5 Bxg5 18. hxg5 $14)
16.
Bxd2 fxg4 17. Ng5 $40 Qe8 (17... h6 18. h5 e5 $1 19. hxg6 $1 Bxg5 20. fxg5
Qxg5
21. e4 Qxg6 22. Bxh6 $18) 18. h5 $1 gxh5 19. Rxg4 $1 $18 Rf6 (19... e5 20.
Rh4
exf4 21. Rxh5 Bxg5 22. Rxh7+ Kg8 23. Rh8+ Kf7 24. Qh5+ Ke6 25. Qxe8+ Rxe8
26.
Rxe8+ $18) (19... hxg4 20. Qxh7#) 20. Rh4 Rh6 21. O-O-O a5 22. Rh1 b5 23.
Bd1
$1 (23. Rxh5 Rxh5 24. Qxh5 Qxh5 25. Rxh5 $18) 23... Ra7 24. Bxh5 Qf8 25.
e4 $1
Bd8 (25... dxe4 26. Bg6 $1 Rxh4 27. Qxh4 Bxg5 28. fxg5 $18) 26. f5 b4 27.
Bg6
$1 Rxh4 28. Qxh4 bxc3 29. bxc3 Bf6 30. Qxh7+ $1 Rxh7 31. Rxh7+ Kg8 32. Bf7+
Qxf7 33. Rxf7 (33. Rxf7 Bxg5 34. Rc7 $18) 1-0
-- 
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito 
http://www.newsland.it/news
 segnala gli abusi ad 
ab...@newsland.it

 come ! e ? sono stati tradotti in altri caratteri come $ etc.
È lo standard PGN per i commenti:
http://pgn.freeservers.com/Standard.txt
NAG (Numeric Annotation Glyphs)
Ad esempio:
NAG    Interpretation
---    --------------
  0    null annotation
  1    good move (traditional "!")
  2    poor move (traditional "?")
  3    very good move (traditional "!!")
  4    very poor move (traditional "??")
  5    speculative move (traditional "!?")
  6    questionable move (traditional "?!")
  7    forced move (all others lose quickly)
  8    singular move (no reasonable alternatives)
  9    worst move
(traduzione su 
http://www.robertograssi.net/scaccoweb/Collaboratori/
AntonioParrilla/Art001_11.asp -- link su due righe)
Gabry (anche se lo sapevi, male non fa) :-)
-- 
Home Page:       
http://www-studenti.dm.unipi.it/~stilli/
mailto:
super...@libero.it
           ICQ UIN: 159169930
Caccole Stellari Website: 
http://www.caccolestellari.com/
Gruppo Utenti Linux Pisa: 
http://www.gulp.linux.it/