Newsgroup: it.comp.giochi.action
Titolo: NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan X Tested.

In soldoni il 50% piu' veloce di una 970 e il 35% di una 980.
Forse forse 999-1399$.
 
The GeForce GTX Titan X is releasing prior to AMD’s announcement of 
their Radeon 300 series cards which means NVIDIA is pretty confident 
that they will be able to tackle the upcoming flagship cards from AMD 
that are meant to feature HBM and a fully revised GCN core 
architecture. While most of the details on the red team cards remain 
unknown since AMD wasn’t in the mood to show off their cards at GDC, 
NVIDIA didn’t only show the card themselves but allowed tech sites who 
have received the cards for review to post pictures of the GM-200 based 
flagship product. Since the images have revealed almost every aspect of 
the card (aside from front PCB shots), we have confirmed most of the 
basic specifications of the card.
 
Before getting into the performance benchmarks, let’s take a recap of 
what we know so far about the GeForce GTX Titan graphics card. Since 
the day the card leaked, we knew that the card would feature the GM200 
core architecture which is the biggest chip NVIDIA might ever have 
created which an estimated die size rumored to be around 600mm2. The 
alleged specifications include a die based on a 28nm process, featuring 
the Maxwell core architecture that incorporates 3072 CUDA cores, 192 
Texture Mapping Units and 96 Raster Operation unit that are clocked at 
1002 MHz core frequency, the boost clock remains to be confirmed. The 
card features an absolutely staggering amount of memory at 12 GB GDDR5 
VRAM (an industry first for a single chip card). The memory is expected 
to be clocked at 7008 MHz or 7 GHz effective clock which gives the card 
a maximum band width of 336.0 GB/s along a 384-bit wide memory 
interface. The card draws power from a 8+6 pin connector configuration 
and has a TDP around 225-250W though could be optimized since Maxwell 
is all about power efficiency.
 
Titan X Performance Numbers and Thoughts:
 
Coming to the performance numbers, the performance of the card was 
obtained through several 3DMark validations which were listed in 
Futuremark’s database during this week. The performance can be seen in 
both single GPU and multi-GPU configurations. In 3DMark Firestrike 
Ultra, a gain of around 30-35% is reported against the GeForce GTX 980 
by Videocardz. Similar gains can be seen in 3DMark Firestrike Extreme 
and 3DMark 11 Extreme which are meant to crunch through VRAM by 
utilizing 4K resolution to judge the graphical power of the running 
cards. The gains against the Sapphire Radeon R9 290X 8 GB stand at 50% 
(+/- 5%) which itself is a pretty fast graphics card with loads of 
memory though a 40% gain means that AMD will have to release a very 
powerful card themselves in order to compete against future GM200 
counterparts. Similarly, in 3DMark 11 Extreme, the GeForce GTX Titan X 
scores 7994 points which can be compared to an overclocked  Radeon R9 
290X and GTX 980, both of which score around 5000 points.
 
The most surprising bit is that the GeForce GTX Titan X is just 5-10% 
slower on average than the Titan Z in 3Dmark Firestrike Extreme and 
Performance benchmarks which shows the tremendous capabilities of the 
upcoming GM200 core. Videocardz has compiled the scores quite good 
which can be seen below in the images:
 
http://oz.io/i/H14Z
 
 
The benchmarks above give us a good insight at the performance of the 
upcoming GeForce GTX Titan X graphics card. Future buyers can judge the 
card of its performance by comparing it with previous and current 
generation cards based on its price which is expected around $999 – 
$1399 US. The card will feature a fully black aluminum alloy shroud 
with the default Maxwell I/O configuration of DVI, HDMI and three 
Display ports. Expect more information and gaming benchmarks in the 
days to come.
 
Leaked/Alleged Performance Results From Chinese Forums
 
Update: A few more results have been posted by Chiphell Forums that are 
sourced back to Baidu. The three pictures posted on the forum show a 
synthetic benchmark of the Titan X running in 3DMark Firestrike which 
scores around the same marks in extreme mode which we saw in the above 
benchmarks around 7800 that is close to the GeForce GTX Titan Z which 
has a score of 8560 3DMarks.
 
The second chart is more interesting since it shows the performance 
averages across 22 AAA titles at 2K res. The GeForce GTX Titan X ends 
up being faster than all single chip cards including the dual chip 
Titan Z which puts it neck to neck with a Radeon R9 295X2 graphics 
card. The Titan X would be able to carry an additional advantage on 
higher resolutions with its 12 GB VRAM, all of which can be used per 
task unlike the dual-chip based cards that only carry either 4 GB or 6 
GB VRAM.
 
Last up is the power consumption chart which we have been waiting to 
see that shows just how power efficient the Maxwell GM200 core is 
against its Kepler counterparts. It turns out that the GeForce GTX 
Titan X draws the same power as a reference GeForce GTX Titan and just 
a few watts lower than a GTX 780 Ti at 258W load while playing 
Battlefield 4. Do note that the performance figures aren’t finalized 
since the drivers for the card are not yet official so the benchmarks 
here are very close estimates of what’s to come over the next few days 
when the card is launched.
 
http://oz.io/i/H8H8
 
http://oz.io/i/A113
 
http://oz.io/i/A4F4
 

 
 
Da prendere per il nuovo rendering pc, ma processori nuovi Intel si sa
qualcosa ?

 
cica...@email.it
 (Cicalone) ha scritto:

Quali...Broadwell o Skylake? :-) 
 
-- 
 
 
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://www.piaohong.tk/newsgroup
 

Dopo dura riflessione, Cicalone ha scritto :

In arrivo i Broadwell-k mid 2015 e i Skylake Q3 2015.
I Skylake sono quelli da tenere d'occhio.


Tra l'altro vedo che tra le mille novità c'è thunderbolt 3.0

 I Skylake sono quelli da tenere d'occhio.
 
Sará qualcosa di meglio del solito +5% prestazioni -5% consumi (quando va
bene)?
Immagino solo ddr4
 
 
 
-- 
- I'm afraid to close my eyes, I'm afraid to open them
 
- Devi sparargli sul naso!
 
- Rivoglio il mio scellino!

 
 
Che non dipende dalla cpu in se...ma semmai dal chipset di supporto.


 Immagino solo ddr4
 
Dovrebbe avere un doppio controller DDR3/4...


 Che non dipende dalla cpu in se...ma semmai dal chipset di supporto.
 
Per info sulla cpu mi interessavo al cambio completo della macchina ed è
buono a sapersi che nel caso troverei nel sistema il thunderbolt 3.0 che
se assente poteva essere un freno all'investimento


 
quindi con uno sli di 970 gli fai il "culo" e spendi la metà :D

 
 
Magari interessa anche a quelli che fanno altro oltre ai
 giochi...potrebbe essere simile alla prima Titan dove in DP aveva
 prestazioni piu' che doppie rispetto alla GTX680 di
 turno.


 quindi con uno sli di 970 gli fai il "culo" e spendi la metà :D
 
E' ovviamente indirizzata sopratutto ad un tipo di utenza diversa.
 
Se fai CG per dire con uno sli di 970 da 3.5GB ti ci pulisci il culo, 
con una Titan X da 12GB invece ci lavoricchi. :D


vero...ma se fai CG non ti indirizzi verso altre schede ?


Dipende da quanti soldi hai da spendere. :D

 ha scritto:

Una Quadro FX5000 la paghi moolto di piu' ad esempio...
