File size: 6,510 Bytes
3176f9b 249a8d7 08c1f68 0eaf3d9 08c1f68 0eaf3d9 08c1f68 0eaf3d9 08c1f68 249a8d7 0eaf3d9 249a8d7 08c1f68 0eaf3d9 08c1f68 3176f9b ae31e03 53c5aec 3176f9b 57b5ef8 3176f9b 57b5ef8 3176f9b 44e6832 ae31e03 44e6832 a348986 3176f9b 6d4eafb 3176f9b 8fc673f 3176f9b |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 |
---
language:
- en
license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
pretty_name: DiPlomat
dataset_info:
- config_name: CQA
features:
- name: text
sequence: string
- name: speaker
sequence: string
- name: gold_statement
dtype: string
- name: questions
dtype: string
- name: answer
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 19805284
num_examples: 15585
- name: validation
num_bytes: 1959148
num_examples: 1559
- name: test
num_bytes: 2967746
num_examples: 2338
download_size: 25566918
dataset_size: 24732178
- config_name: NLI_with_context
features:
- name: dialogue
sequence: string
- name: speaker
sequence: string
- name: human answer
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 2977929
num_examples: 2551
download_size: 3042193
dataset_size: 2977929
- config_name: NLI_without_context
features:
- name: text
dtype: string
- name: hypothesis
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 1095335
num_examples: 2551
download_size: 1146864
dataset_size: 1095335
- config_name: PIR_first
features:
- name: text
sequence: string
- name: speaker
sequence: string
- name: correct_turn_number
sequence: int64
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 3442927
num_examples: 3341
- name: validation
num_bytes: 161433
num_examples: 168
- name: test
num_bytes: 687605
num_examples: 668
download_size: 4366468
dataset_size: 4291965
- config_name: PIR_second
features:
- name: text
sequence: string
- name: speaker
sequence: string
- name: correct_turn_number
dtype: int64
- name: label
dtype: int64
- name: choice
sequence: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 9263111
num_examples: 5188
- name: validation
num_bytes: 399924
num_examples: 244
- name: test
num_bytes: 1890798
num_examples: 1062
download_size: 11740508
dataset_size: 11553833
---
# DiPlomat
<!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life
conversations and is essential for the development of communicative social agents.
In this paper, we introduce a novel challenge, **DiPlomat**, aiming at benchmarking machines’ capabilities
on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding.
Compared with previous works that treat different figurative expressions
(e.g. metaphor, sarcasm) as individual tasks, **DiPlomat** provides a cohesive framework
towards general pragmatic understanding.
## Dataset Details
The **DiPlomat** dataset owns 4,177 data and covers a vocabulary of 48,900 words.
More than that, human-annotated answers reach an amount of 6,494,
hold a vocabulary size of 20,000, and cover 5 types of reasoning.
Along with the dataset, we propose two tasks:
**Pragmatic Identification and Reasoning (PIR)** and **Conversational Question Answering (CQA)**. Furthermore, we provide the
data that we use for **zero-NLI**.
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [English]
- **License:** [CC BY-NC-SA (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
### Dataset Sources
<!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
- **Repository:** [link](https://github.com/diplomat-dataset/diplomat)
- **Paper:** [DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09030)
- **Website:** [link](https://diplomat-dataset.github.io)
## Dataset Structure
<!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits, relationships between data points, etc. -->
| Field | Task|
| --- | --- |
| ``PIR_first`` | Pragmatic Identification and Reasoning Subtask1|
| ``PIR_second`` | Pragmatic Identification and Reasoning Subtask2|
| ``CQA`` | Conversational Question Answering|
| ``NLI_with_context`` | Zero-Shot NLI with context|
| ``NLI_without_context`` | Zero-Shot NLI without context|
**NOTE:** If you'd like to test on the whole PIR task, please don't change the order of PIR Subtask 1's and Subtask 2's test file's data, as both of them are deliberately arranged as the same order.
## Dataset Creation
### Source Data
We leverage the data of [INTERVIEW dataset](https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/shuyangli94/interview-npr-media-dialog-transcripts) collected by
Majumder et al as our source.
<!-- This section describes the source data (e.g. news text and headlines, social media posts, translated sentences, ...). -->
### Annotating Process
<!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
#### Step I. Automatic Selection:
The extensive size of the source dataset introduces redundancy,
and thus requires automatic measures to alleviate the burden of human annotation.
Therefore, we employ algorithms and models to perform an initial filtering process.
#### Step II. Fine-grained Annotation:
We leverage Amazon Mechanical Turk to conduct detailed annotations of pragmatic turns within our dialogues.
Workers participating in the annotation task are instructed to select
all turns that exhibit a divergence between their literal meaning and their intended meaning.
Due to the subjective nature of pragmatic reasoning, we request the workers to provide confidence scores
along with reasons for their choices.
#### Step III. Human Refinement:
In this process, tasks for workers are formulated as multiple-choice questions.
Previously collected human-annotated reasons are transformed into choices, utilizing a template format:
[turn {turn_id}: {reason}]. In addition, to mitigate the impact of careless workers,
we introduce a distractor choice for each gold choice.
## Citation
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
```
@inproceedings{li2023diplomat,
title={DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning},
author={Hengli Li and Song-Chun Zhu and Zilong Zheng},
booktitle={Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track},
year={2023}
}
```
## Dataset Card Contact
If there is any problem with the dataset, please email [lihengli@stu.pku.edu.cn](mailto: 2000017754@stu.pku.edu.cn).
|