Datasets:

cris177

/

Arguments

like 4

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest, since if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest, because if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest, as if john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his face during the arrest then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his face during the arrest Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway, since if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway, because if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway, as if laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbor saw a strange car parked in her driveway then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's neighbor did not see a strange car parked in her driveway Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street and a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox, since if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox, because if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A handwritten note with threats was not found in laura's mailbox, as if a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten note with threats was found in laura's mailbox then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A handwritten note with threats was not found in Laura's mailbox Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A bloody glove was discovered in the backyard Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard, since if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard, because if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard, as if a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody glove was discovered in the backyard then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A bloody glove was not discovered in the backyard Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis was in possession of laura's personal documents Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents, since if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents, because if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis was not in possession of laura's personal documents, as if john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of laura's personal documents then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of Laura's personal documents Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>