Datasets:

cris177

/

Arguments

like 4

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene, since if footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene, because if footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene, as if footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had installed a home security system, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had installed a home security system, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had installed a home security system, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had installed a home security system, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had installed a home security system, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had installed a home security system, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had installed a home security system, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had installed a home security system, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had installed a home security system Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura had not installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura had not installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura had not installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura had not installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura had not installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura had not installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura had not installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura had not installed a home security system.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura had not installed a home security system, since if laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura had not installed a home security system, because if laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura had not installed a home security system, as if laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had installed a home security system then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not installed a home security system Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street and a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat, since if a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat, because if a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A recorded voicemail from laura does not contain a threat, as if a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a recorded voicemail from laura contains a threat then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A recorded voicemail from Laura does not contain a threat Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had bruises on his arms, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had bruises on his arms, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had bruises on his arms, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had bruises on his arms, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had bruises on his arms, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had bruises on his arms, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had bruises on his arms, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had bruises on his arms, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had bruises on his arms Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis did not have bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis did not have bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis did not have bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis did not have bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis did not have bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have bruises on his arms.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis did not have bruises on his arms, since if john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis did not have bruises on his arms, because if john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis did not have bruises on his arms, as if john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had bruises on his arms then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis did not have bruises on his arms Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a strand of hair was found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A strand of hair was found at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a strand of hair was not found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a strand of hair was not found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a strand of hair was not found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a strand of hair was not found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a strand of hair was not found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a strand of hair was not found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a strand of hair was not found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a strand of hair was not found at the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene, since if a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene, because if a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene, as if a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a strand of hair was found at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A strand of hair was not found at the crime scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>