Datasets:

cris177

/

Arguments

like 4

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor heard a gunshot, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor heard a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor heard a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor heard a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A neighbor heard a gunshot Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a neighbor did not hear a gunshot.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A neighbor did not hear a gunshot, since if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A neighbor did not hear a gunshot, because if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A neighbor did not hear a gunshot, as if a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor heard a gunshot then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not hear a gunshot Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's social media accounts were hacked, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's social media accounts were hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's social media accounts were hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's social media accounts were hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's social media accounts were hacked Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's social media accounts were not hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's social media accounts were not hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's social media accounts were not hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's social media accounts were not hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's social media accounts were not hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's social media accounts were not hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's social media accounts were not hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's social media accounts were not hacked.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's social media accounts were not hacked, since if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's social media accounts were not hacked, because if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's social media accounts were not hacked, as if laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's social media accounts were hacked then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's social media accounts were not hacked Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had recently purchased a firearm, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had recently purchased a firearm, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had recently purchased a firearm, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had recently purchased a firearm, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had recently purchased a firearm, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had recently purchased a firearm, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had recently purchased a firearm, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had recently purchased a firearm, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis had recently purchased a firearm Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis had not recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis had not recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis had not recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis had not recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis had not recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis had not recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis had not recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis had not recently purchased a firearm.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis had not recently purchased a firearm, since if john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis had not recently purchased a firearm, because if john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis had not recently purchased a firearm, as if john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had recently purchased a firearm then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis had not recently purchased a firearm Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john, since if laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john, because if laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from john, as if laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of threats from john then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of threats from John Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that footprints matching john's shoes were not found near the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints matching john's shoes were found near the scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Footprints matching John's shoes were not found near the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>