Datasets:

cris177

/

Arguments

like 4

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument, since if a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument, because if a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument, as if a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing a loud argument then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A neighbor did not report hearing a loud argument Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's pet cat is missing, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's pet cat is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's pet cat is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's pet cat is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's pet cat is missing Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's pet cat is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's pet cat is not missing, since if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's pet cat is not missing, because if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura's pet cat is not missing, as if laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's pet cat is missing then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura's pet cat is not missing Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: A fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect, since if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect, because if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect, as if a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a fingerprint on the murder weapon matches the suspect then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: A fingerprint on the murder weapon does not match the suspect Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura had recently changed the locks on her doors Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors, since if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors, because if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors, as if laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed the locks on her doors then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed the locks on her doors Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis has a history of violent behavior, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis has a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis has a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis has a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: John davis has a history of violent behavior Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis does not have a history of violent behavior.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis does not have a history of violent behavior, since if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis does not have a history of violent behavior, because if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```John davis does not have a history of violent behavior, as if john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis has a history of violent behavior then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street Conclusion: John Davis does not have a history of violent behavior Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's laptop was found smashed Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's laptop was found smashed Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's laptop was found smashed Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's laptop was found smashed Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>

<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's laptop was found smashed, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's laptop was found smashed then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Laura's laptop was found smashed Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>