reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com.json

[
    {
        "Id": "15",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-20T19:26:40.543",
        "Body": "<p>Coming from <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/59/what-are-the-essential-ida-plugins-or-ida-python-scripts-that-you-use#comment60_59\">this comment</a>: is it possible to create a community wiki during the private beta?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Does the private beta have community wiki?",
        "Tags": "|support|community-wiki|",
        "Answer": "<p>Yes, it is possible to create a community wiki answer. But there is rarely any case for it. Community wiki was primarily useful in the old days when there was a minimum reputation requirement to edit posts. Now, anyone can suggest an edit (which will be reviewed if the editor doesn't have enough reputation), so community wiki has lost most of its use. FAQ-type posts have also been replaced by tag wikis to a large extent. You may want to use it on an answer to encourage others to contribute to it actively, but that's very rare.</p>\n\n<p>It is not possible to create a community wiki question. The possibility used to exist, but was removed because there was no good use for it. On Stack Overflow, it used to be a way to tolerate bad questions, <a href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/08/the-future-of-community-wiki/\">but this is no longer done</a>.</p>\n\n<p>Community wiki answers are still used on meta sites, which don't have suggested edits, for things like FAQs.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "20",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-20T22:36:17.163",
        "Body": "<p>Some stack exchange sites get lots of both upvotes and downvotes for question and answers. Others get much fewer votes. Do we want to be a high-voting site?</p>\n\n<p>Here is one perspective from <a href=\"https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/users/77/scott-morrison\">Scott Morrison</a> over on meta.Tex.SE\n\n<ul>\n<li><p>Every Stack Exchange site will eventually end up with a different\n\"base level\" of voting --- that is, the expected number of upvotes\nfor a question of a given level of excellence. (This effect occurs\nbecause people see a good question, but already with a certain number\nof votes, and think \"oh, I would have upvoted this, but it already\nhas enough\".)</p>\n\n<p>It's easy for us to affect this \"base level\" by encouraging high\nlevels of upvoting now. We're setting the standards, and this really\nwill have an effect.</p>\n\n<p>(On MathOverflow, we were very active about this early on,\nspecifically encouraging all the initial round of users to vote early\nand often. You can compare statistics, and see that the average vote\ntotal for a MathOverflow question is much higher than on any of the\nother SE 1.0 sites.)</p>\n\n<p>In case it's not obvious: the rationale for wanting this base level\nto be high is that it provides better positive feedback to good\ncontributors</p></li>\n</ul>\n",
        "Title": "Do we want to be a high-voting site?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|voting|",
        "Answer": "<p>During the beta period, it is important to generate reputation in the system so that users can start performing tasks other than simply asking and answering. As an example, at the moment we have just 3 users who have the privilege of reviewing Tag Wiki edits, the result being that such edits need approval from someone from SE to go through. </p>\n\n<p>So, yes, I think that we should be a high voting site during the beta period at least so that we can have some users who have the higher reputation privileges and access to the necessary moderation tools.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "21",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-20T23:18:25.030",
        "Body": "<p>I'm wondering if questions about how to make reverse engineering more difficult are within the scope of this site?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Are questions about trying to make reverse engineering harder appropriate?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|scope|",
        "Answer": "<p>Yes, sure. The expertise on making reverse engineering easier is the same as the expertise on making the reverse engineering harder. Just as <a href=\"https://security.stackexchange.com/\">Security</a> caters to both attackers and defenders, RE.SE can but cater to both obfuscators and reversers.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "28",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-22T12:43:43.287",
        "Body": "<p>I've noticed quite a few questions whose gists are extremely similar to example questions suggested during the definition phase.  Some have been closed and downvoted, others have gone on to become some of the top questions on this site.</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/139/what-are-the-techniques-disassemblers-use-to-process-a-binary\">Exhibit A</a> taken from <a href=\"http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/49551/reverse-engineering/50329#50329\">this Area 51 question</a> [closed]</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/74/are-there-any-open-source-test-suites-for-testing-how-well-a-disassembler-perfor\">Exhibit B</a> [a very successful question]</li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>Is it acceptable to copy questions from the area 51 site like this and post them here?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Is it possible to take questions directly from the area 51 site?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|asking-questions|",
        "Answer": "<p>The example questions proposed on Area 51 are supposed to be questions you would ask on the actual site. Now the site is here, so if you have a question, ask it. I'm not entirely certain why someone might object if the question was inspired by Area 51.</p>\n\n<p>The problem with the specific question you cited is that it is vague and incomplete. They just copied the <em>title</em> of a question without any actual content. It doesn't represent a <em>real</em> problem&hellip; which is why I resist suggestions that we automatically post the top questions from Area 51 when the site is launched. They're not real questions.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "45",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-24T16:36:49.653",
        "Body": "<p>When I look at the site for now, I generally distinguish two different topics:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Questions about computer software, websites, etc., e.g.: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/90/187\">Get used jQuery plugins from website</a></li>\n<li>Questions about really low-level things, like microcontrollers, e.g.: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/128/187\">Get code from protected PIC</a></li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>Is this a problem? I feel like it might get a problem, because there aren't that much people who are working in both fields. While the way of working may be the same, we might get two subsets (one for high-level and one for low-level) in the community, that aren't really communicating with each other.</p>\n\n<p>If this is a problem, how are we going to resolve this? We could of course change the FAQ to accept only one type. We could say the second type has to go to <a href=\"http://electronics.stackexchange.com\">Electrical Engineering</a>, for example. However, there might be a neater solution with which we aren't losing a part of the community. </p>\n",
        "Title": "The site tends to attract two different fields of profession",
        "Tags": "|discussion|scope|",
        "Answer": "<p>That's the whole point of the site: being about reverse engineering of anything. If we start splitting, then software reverse engineering goes on Stack Overflow, hardware reverse engineering goes on Electrical Engineering, chemical reverse engineering goes on Chemistry, and so on, and this site needn't exist.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "46",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-24T17:58:29.280",
        "Body": "<p>Should tags be singular like <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/compiler\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;compiler&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">compiler</a> or plural like <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/debuggers\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;debuggers&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">debuggers</a> ?</p>\n\n<p>Alternatively, should both versions of a tag be created and made synonyms ?</p>\n",
        "Title": "What should be the policy for singular/plural tags?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|tags|",
        "Answer": "<p>On Stack Overflow, I think the singular dominates but there's no agreement. Most newer Stack Exchange sites tend to favor plural tags for countable objects, e.g. <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/compilers\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;compilers&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">compilers</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/debuggers\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;debuggers&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">debuggers</a>, reserving the singular for concepts (<a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/compilation\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;compilation&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">compilation</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/debugging\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;debugging&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">debugging</a>). I propose to follow this convention: use the plural for countable nouns. That is what was adopted with near-consensus <a href=\"https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/should-we-prefer-singular-or-plural-in-tags\">on English Stack Exchange</a>. It goes along the intuition that a tag name is what you use to complete the sentence \u201cthis question is about ____\u201d.</p>\n\n<p>Generally there's no need to create both versions, and indeed the engine won't let you. As soon as one version of the tag exists, you can't create the other one (e.g. now that <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/debuggers\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;debuggers&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">debuggers</a> exists, if you try to create <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/debugger\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;debugger&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">debugger</a>, you'll get an error message).</p>\n\n<p>For multi-word tags, there is a standard: use a <code>-</code> to separate words, e.g. <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/static-analysis\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;static-analysis&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">static-analysis</a> (not <s><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/staticanalysis\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;staticanalysis&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">staticanalysis</a></s>).</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "47",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-24T18:32:57.160",
        "Body": "<p>I've asked <a href=\"https://security.stackexchange.com/q/33139/21287\">this question</a> on RE.SE and got a negative response: 4 downvotes and a note from Anton Kockkov:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>This is a question for IT Security site, not for Reverse Engineering.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>I see how this is on topic on IT Security, but I do not see how this is off topic here. The Reverse Engineering SE is for ... </p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>researchers and developers who explore the principles of a system through analysis of its structure, function, and operation</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>So the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/faq\">faq</a> says. </p>\n\n<p>In this particular question, I am a developer or researcher of a system, more specific a website. I explore the principles of that system, the website, by finding out on what CMS it's based. This has to be done through analysis of its structure (the HTML and CSS code) and perhaps on some functions of the website. And exactly with that, the analysis, I need help, because I don't know how to perform the analysis.</p>\n\n<p>So why exactly is this off topic?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Typicals of CMSs - off topic?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|scope|specific-question|",
        "Answer": "<p>Although the FAQ quote is arguably describing your question, I think the community consensus is quite clear. The skills and expertise required to reverse engineer a program, a firmware or a security chip are in very different than the expertise and knowledge needed to recognise which CMS system is used to generate HTML/CSS code. This is also evident by the lack of answers to your question here in RE.SE.</p>\n\n<p>Putting semantics and phrasing aside, we're simply not the right people to ask such questions, as we tend to focus on the lowlevel (assembly, hardware, C) rather than the highlevel (HTML, PHP, Python) for the systems we research. We rarely discuss web attacks here, for instance, although it's a topic tightly close to reverse engineering and security.</p>\n\n<p>Also, I would like to suggest a question involving more reverse engineering would receive a warmer welcome if presented here, but yours seems to be mostly relaying on familiarity with existing CMS systems and less of need for the common skills of a reverse engineer.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "66",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-27T19:43:41.053",
        "Body": "<p>I would like to know if asking about the use of a tool that is designed for the purposes of reverse engineering is on topic?</p>\n\n<p>The questions that follow under this category would be asking about software that is used for reverse engineering where the answer would help the community reverse engineer with that tool.</p>\n\n<p>Some examples of these kinds of questions include:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/302/treating-independent-code-as-a-function-in-ida-pro\">Treating independent code as a function in IDA Pro</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/175/what-is-a-flirt-signature\">What is a FLIRT signature?</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/97/equivalent-of-ida-flirt-signatures-for-gdb\">Equivalent of IDA FLIRT signatures for GDB?</a></li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>An example of a question that is not covered by this description is[(Note, I'm not saying these are or are not valid questions, just they they aren't  being evaluated under the description above): </p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/243/how-does-gdbs-process-recording-work\">How does GDB&#39;s process recording work?</a> The destiniction is that this question is about how a particular tool works, not about how to use a particular tool.</li>\n</ul>\n",
        "Title": "Is asking about reverse engineering tools on topic",
        "Tags": "|discussion|scope|",
        "Answer": "<p>I realize there is a fine line between debuggers being used in software development and in RCE, but we shouldn't shy away from questions concerning dual-use tools just because they are dual-use.</p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>As for the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/243\">How does GDB&#39;s process recording work?</a> question, I would say such things should also be considered on topic for the simple reason that reverse (code) engineering relies in large part on experience and circumstantial knowledge.</p>\n\n<p>Therefore knowing how your tools work often provides missing jigsaw pieces should be considered an intrinsic part of the discipline.</p>\n\n<p>Also:</p>\n\n<p>Dynamic analysis just like static analysis is a part of RCE and debuggers play a vital role in it. Therefore knowing how certain features in a debugger work makes sense.</p>\n\n<p>Even if the intention behind <em>this</em> question may not go that far, I think that most reverse engineers at one point or another have written their own debugger. Which goes to show how relevant it is to know <em>how</em> things work internally.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "74",
        "CreationDate": "2013-03-29T13:08:56.550",
        "Body": "<p>If a question has already been asked on SO, is it OK to repost questions with a self-answer (FAQ style) if they are very relevant to RE (e.g. useful questions about disassemblers, assembly language questions, etc)?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Is it OK to duplicate information from SO?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|scope|",
        "Answer": "<p><strong>No, do not duplicate an already answered SO question unless you need additional information that only the reverse engineering audience can provide.</strong> We want to minimize the duplication of content between the sites as much as possible because it is very easy for content to be lost and become out of date.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "88",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-02T13:21:03.410",
        "Body": "<p>I know, you want to accept an answer to show the problem is solved. But really, the quality of the site can be improved when you <em>do not accept an answer too fast</em>. </p>\n\n<p>An answer might be correct and useful, but there may be much better answers out there! When an answer is already accepted, this discourages others to answer as well, as the question seems 'done'. </p>\n\n<p>When you get a useful answer, upvote it, but wait like one or two days with accepting it. </p>\n\n<p>I can understand you could be afraid of forgetting the question and never accepting it. What I do is checking back every now and then on all the SE sites I'm active on if I have any open questions of which I can accept an answer. This only takes like five minutes.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Do not accept an answer so fast!",
        "Tags": "|discussion|answer-quality|answers|accepted-answer|",
        "Answer": "<p>Okay, as I outlined already in my comments, I am also doing this on other SE sites: i.e. <em>not</em> accepting too quickly. It may lead to forgetting to accept an <em>existing</em> answer temporarily, but inside your profile a nagging notice will appear over questions you have asked but on which you didn't accept any answer:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Have you considered accepting an answer or starting a bounty for this question?</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>My main reason is indeed that I know from the other side of the fence how discouraging it is to find that a question that was the first, already got the most upvotes or was written by the guy with the most reputation in the room and therefore gets accepted \"by default\".</p>\n\n<p>As Camil Staps points out:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>When an answer is already accepted, this discourages others to answer as well, as the question seems 'done'.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>It's too true, because doing it creates a dynamic of its own and doesn't necessarily foster the quality of the answers but instead <em>quantity</em> or <em>speed</em>. Often questions will be short and still to the point, but more often it seems to give an advantage to have high rep already. The quality of these answers is in many cases no better than what exists as answer from a lower rep user, but for some reasons the high rep user will garner the upvotes anyway \"by default\".</p>\n\n<p>There are so many answers out there on all of the SE sites and oftentimes I go *facepalm* and sit down to write up a comprehensive answer to a rather old question well knowing that I won't get (m)any upvotes for it. The whole Q&amp;A spirit of the SE sites demands I do it. After all these sites have a high search engine rank and people will come here to look for answers and often consider them authoritative. Hence it is very important to foster the quality and <strong><em>not</em></strong> the speed or quantity of answers.</p>\n\n<p>An existing answer that tells you that you can't do something even though you can full well do it, <strong>but was accepted</strong> because either the OP gave into the nagging notice (<em>Have you considered accepting an answer ...</em>) in his/her profile or didn't know better, doesn't really encourage to write up another better and more comprehensive answer when you know that all you do is \"wasting time\" (because the topic is a niche topic in the first place) and you won't get gratification by means of upvotes either.</p>\n\n<p>So to reiterate: this is a discussion and I fully support <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/users/187/camil-staps\">Camil Staps'</a> view because I'd like quality to be a more relevant metric than quantity.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "98",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-03T17:28:39.513",
        "Body": "<p>A beta that just started will hardly end up with a lot of high rep users in a short time frame. Are there any special rules w.r.t. the reputation needed for certain actions or is it the same as on any other SE network site for betas, too?</p>\n\n<p>Examples:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>adding new tags</li>\n<li>editing without the edit ending up in the queue</li>\n<li>being able to peer review edits in the first place</li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>If I see this correctly from the list of what the rep levels provide, it looks like none of us can even peer review edits, right? Who is doing it then? Is that the SE staff?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Are there no special rules for betas?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>Just adding to what Gilles mentioned, the rep limits for the various privileges vary depending on what phase the site is in. Here is the complete list :</p>\n<h3>Main sites</h3>\n<pre>\nAction                                          Priv \u00df Public \u00df  Golden       SO\n\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\nSkip lecture on how to ask                        None     None    None       10\nAnswer questions on the site's meta                  5        5       5      N/A\nAdd images, 2+ link, answer protected questions      1       10?     10       10\nCreate community-wiki answers                       10       10      10       10\nVote up                                              1       15      15       15\nFlag offensive                                      15       15      15       15\nChat                                               20 global reputation*      20\nLeave comments on any questions or answer            1       50      50       50\nMake bounties                                       75       75      75       75\nCreate a chat room                                100 global reputation*     100\nVote down (costs 1 rep)                              1      100     100      100\nEdit community wiki posts                            1      100     100      100\nCreate new tags                                      1      150     300     1500\nVote in moderator elections                        No elections     150      150\n+100 rep to all linked accounts                    200      200     200      200\nReduced advertisements                        No advertisements     200      200\nRetag questions                                      1      200     500      500\nVote to close, reopen, or migrate your questions     1      250     250      250\nNominate for moderator                             No elections     300      300?\nShow up/down vote splits; user card                100      750    1000     1000\nCreate a gallery chat room                       1000 global reputation*    1000\nEdit other people's posts                          500     1000    2000     2000\nSuggest tag synonyms                              1250     1250    2500     2500\nVote to close, reopen, or migrate any questions      1      500    3000     3000\nApprove tag wiki edits                             750     1500    5000     5000\nDelete closed questions, moderation tools         1000     2000   10000    10000\nReduce captchas                                   1000?    2000   10000    10000\nReview chat flags                               10000 global reputation*   10000\nProtect questions                                 1750     3500   15000    15000\nEdit tag wikis immediately; more deletion         2000     4000   20000    20000\nPainting of unicorns, signed by Jeff and Joel                    200000   200000\n</pre>\n<p><a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/160292/200868\">Source.</a></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "107",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-05T08:44:16.823",
        "Body": "<p>Just wondering, is it already possibly to <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/91381/how-to-migrate-question-to-programmers-stackexchange-com\">migrate questions</a> from other stackexchange sites such as stackoverflow to Reverse Engineering?</p>\n\n<p>Same for questions like this <a href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15826792/how-can-i-modify-a-delphi-executable?noredirect=1#comment22518879_15826792\">question</a> that have already been closed.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Is it possible to migrate a question from other stackexchange sites to Reverse Engineering?",
        "Tags": "|support|migration|",
        "Answer": "<p>While it's <em>technically</em> possible to migrate questions, the migration paths are not set up until a site becomes well-established. </p>\n\n<p>But beyond that technical limitation, building this community from the old, pre-answered questions of another site would do <strong><em>this</em></strong> site a terrible disservice. <strong>That's not how you want to build this site.</strong></p>\n\n<p>Forget for a moment that other site may not <em>want</em> their content removed like that (along with the the knowledge and reputation earned). Consider that, from day one, your brand new site will be <strong>filled with old, pre-answered anonymous questions, as the original authors are off on another site.</strong> </p>\n\n<p>The creation of this site was a somewhat controversial. The subject is already covered to some extent on <em>other</em> sites. But the idea of creating a site <em>dedicated</em> to Digital Preservation is to build a community was supposedly not being well-served by another site. I wouldn't rush to simply migrate someone else's content content here. Continue focusing on building your own community. You should focus on building your <em>own</em> content with properly curated solutions, built with the community and expertise that genuinely belongs here.</p>\n\n<p>That was the point of creating this site in the first place.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "122",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-07T17:42:50.613",
        "Body": "<p>As I suddenly figured out, there is plain HTTP used on log-in form to <a href=\"http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com\">http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com</a></p>\n\n<p>No SSL\\HTTPS implemented, and password in login form transferred in clear text.\nAs You may see, this is not secure at all.</p>\n\n<p><strong>Workaround</strong> I found for myself - log in at <a href=\"https://stackexchange.com/\">https://stackexchange.com/</a> and then - use Login button on reverseengineering.stackexchange.com to extend login session to subdomain as well. It's not 100% secure also, but at least not credential but session passed in clear text here.</p>\n\n<p>So - question is, <strong>is there any option to enable secure login directly to project website, without workarounds?</strong> </p>\n\n<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> well, always re-check results before You ask questions. \nActual OpenID form URL is <a href=\"https://openid.stackexchange.com/affiliate/form\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://openid.stackexchange.com/affiliate/form</a>\nSo - problem is partially solved.</p>\n\n<p>Anyway - site with information related to InfoSec IMHO should at least have SSL available for all traffic, even if it not default.</p>\n",
        "Title": "HTTPS\\SSL authentication for users",
        "Tags": "|feature-request|status-planned|",
        "Answer": "<p>HTTPS connections to the questions and answers site have been requested for a long time but are currently not supported.</p>\n\n<p>If you're using Stack Exchange as your OpenID provider, you can connect to <a href=\"https://stackexchange.com/\">https://stackexchange.com/</a> and log in there. Even if you connect to <a href=\"http://stackexchange.com/\">http://stackexchange.com/</a>, <strong>assuming</strong> you haven't been redirected to another site by an active man-in-the-middle, <strong>your credentials are not sent in cleartext</strong> \u2014 the login form does use HTTPS. That still leaves your session cookie exposed to potential hijacking.</p>\n\n<p>Some prior requests and discussions on the topic:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/69171/why-doesnt-the-stack-overflow-team-fix-the-firesheep-style-cookie-theft\">Why doesn&#39;t the Stack Overflow team fix the Firesheep style cookie theft?</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/128733/stackexchange-openid-provider-should-clearly-use-https\">StackExchange OpenID provider should clearly use HTTPS</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/116782/better-https-support-for-stack-exchange-sites\">Better HTTPS support for Stack Exchange sites</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://security.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1048/why-doesnt-security-stackexchange-com-use-https\">https://security.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1048/why-doesnt-security-stackexchange-com-use-https</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://security.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/104/are-there-plans-to-support-https\">https://security.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/104/are-there-plans-to-support-https</a></li>\n</ul>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "131",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-09T10:16:39.243",
        "Body": "<p>Since this site is public now, I guess we shall start to see questions related to \nsolving challenges on some wargame, solving a crackme and so on... As someone how has learned a great deal by doing such challenges myself, I can appreciate the value of doing the actual research and discovery process myself, and wouldn't have liked it if i could just read the solution somewhere. My concern is that many challenges could be spoiled by directly answered questions here. </p>\n\n<p>Now, I'm not talking about straight \"How do I solve this crackme\" type of questions, I guess those are right out. I'm talking about questions that are not obviously related to some challenge, but you know them to be if you've solved/seen it before. </p>\n\n<p>Would you find this an issue at all ? How would you deal with these?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Wargames, crackmes and CTFs - how to deal with spoilers?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<h1>suggestion</h1>\n<p>just use</p>\n<blockquote class=\"spoiler\">\n<p> the spoiler marker: <code>&gt;!</code></p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>for</p>\n<blockquote class=\"spoiler\">\n<p> each separate items</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>and</p>\n<hr />\n<blockquote class=\"spoiler\">\n<p> enough separators</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>so that</p>\n<blockquote class=\"spoiler\">\n<p> not everything is revealed at once.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<h1>conclusion</h1>\n<blockquote class=\"spoiler\">\n<p> This should do the trick!</p>\n</blockquote>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "145",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-15T13:12:27.330",
        "Body": "<p>The private beta is over and no one has been awarded the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/badges/30/beta\">Beta badge</a> yet. Seeing that some users even fulfilled their commitment within the private beta itself along with being active on Meta, I dont think its possible that nobody crossed the threshold. </p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>Also, it appears that this badge is awarded manually globally. Can anybody confirm this?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Where are the beta badges?",
        "Tags": "|bug|status-completed|badges|",
        "Answer": "<p>Oh, look: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/badges/30/beta\">45 of 'em, hot off the forge</a>.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "153",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-16T21:35:40.723",
        "Body": "<p>Since the site scope isn't limited to <em>reverse <strong>code</strong> engineering</em> as such, would it make sense to have a specific tag for questions regarding the <strong>reverse engineering of code</strong> in particular? I.e. something like <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/rce\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;rce&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">rce</a>?!</p>\n",
        "Title": "Should we have a [tag:rce]?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>In my opinion, whenever anyone mentions \"Reverse Engineering,\" everyone's thoughts jump straight to reverse code engineering. RCE should be implied, unless there are other tags such as <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ree\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ree&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ree</a> for electrical, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/rme\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;rme&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">rme</a> for mechanical, and so on.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "154",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-16T21:46:50.667",
        "Body": "<p>Could we rename <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/windows-api\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;windows-api&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">windows-api</a> to <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/winapi\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;winapi&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">winapi</a>? StackOverflow uses the latter, shorter form. It would make sense to go with an established standard here, since this is referring to the same thing anyway.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Could we rename [tag:windows-api] to [tag:winapi]?",
        "Tags": "|feature-request|support|status-completed|",
        "Answer": "<p>Good catch. <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/winapi\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;winapi&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">winapi</a> Done.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "161",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-17T01:35:37.437",
        "Body": "<p>Subject line says it all: Could someone alias <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/dissasembler\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;dissasembler&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">dissasembler</a> (see spelling) to <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disassembler\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;disassembler&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">disassembler</a>, please?</p>\n\n<p>The former just got inadvertently created by someone posting a question. I fixed that by giving the correct spelling.</p>\n\n<p>Of course I don't know whether this is the right way to go about this or whether it is sufficient to \"delete\" the misspelled version?! </p>\n",
        "Title": "Could someone alias [tag:dissasembler] (see spelling) to [tag:disassembler], please?",
        "Tags": "|support|status-completed|tag-synonyms|",
        "Answer": "<p>There is no need for misspelled versions of a tag. As the tag has now been removed (and is not used by any question), it will get deleted in some time.</p>\n\n<p>Also, as we are following the policy of having plural tags, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disassemblers\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;disassemblers&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">disassemblers</a> created. </p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "164",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-17T03:19:28.487",
        "Body": "<p>How can we control what is shown in the \"see also\" of the mouse-over tool tip that is shown when hovering over a tag name?</p>\n\n<p>An example of this is given in <a href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/08/improved-tagging/\">the second screenshot over in this blog post</a>.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Where does the \"see also\" come from in a tag excerpt?",
        "Tags": "|support|tags|tag-wiki|",
        "Answer": "<p>The tags which appear in the <code>see also</code> field are the tags which are synonyms of the actual tag.  </p>\n\n<p>If you hover over your name in the top panel, you will see an expanded scorecard.  On the top of the scorecard you will see <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/privileges\">Privileges</a>. Clicking on it will take you to the complete list of privileges with the privileges that you have on the site clearly mentioned.  </p>\n\n<p>One of the privileges is the ability to <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/privileges/suggest-tag-synonyms\">Suggest Tag Synonyms</a>.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "183",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-23T18:00:49.130",
        "Body": "<p>Is there a method to embed an instructional video clip in a Q&amp;A the way this can be done with images? Basically what I am asking is whether there is a dedicated space to upload such stuff to similar to how the default image embedding ends up on imgur.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Is there a way to upload instructional videos that will get embedded the way images get embedded?",
        "Tags": "|support|",
        "Answer": "<p>Embedding videos is enabled on a <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66397/provide-a-way-to-embed-videos-in-answers\">per-site basis</a>. They are enabled for Gaming.SE (<a href=\"https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/21640/how-to-unlock-the-achievements-related-to-hidden-areas-in-portal-2\">example</a>) and Music.SE. Only Youtube videos are embedded. </p>\n\n<p>If you think this will benefit the site, post a <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/feature-request\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;feature-request&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">feature-request</a>. </p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "186",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-26T15:47:11.477",
        "Body": "<p>I noticed that our new question per day is really low. What can we do to overcome this?</p>\n\n<p>Should we seed more content ourselves?</p>\n\n<p>I can think of few newbies questions I can ask an answer myself. Is it good practice to do so on beta?</p>\n",
        "Title": "How do we increase the number of questions being asked?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-promotion|questions|",
        "Answer": "<p>get rid of downvoting very frustrating feature as it doesnt tell you why something is being downoted</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "188",
        "CreationDate": "2013-04-28T01:45:43.467",
        "Body": "<p>One way we can promote this site is to create a community promotion ad to be shown on other SE sites. Each graduated SE site has a meta question where people can submit these ads (<a href=\"https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3278/community-promotion-ads-2012\">math</a>, <a href=\"https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/980/community-promotion-ads-2012\">physics</a>), and if they receive enough upvotes (>6) they will be automatically shown by the system.</p>\n\n<p>If we are going to be advertising RE this way, I think it would be useful to have one designated ad to represent the site, and then submit it to the community promotion ad questions on all related sites. So I'm posting this meta question to collect ideas. After a few days we can take the top voted submission and \"distribute\" it. </p>\n\n<p>When an actual community ad is submitted, it is required to be in the form</p>\n\n<pre><code>[![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2]\n\n   [1]: http://image-url\n   [2]: http://clickthrough-url \n</code></pre>\n\n<p>The image must be exactly 220x250 pixels, in GIF or PNG format (not animated), and hosted on SE's Imgur account. I don't think it's strictly necessary for answers to <em>this</em> question to follow that format, but it would be convenient. Answers posted here should definitely include the three required elements:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Image</li>\n<li>Tagline</li>\n<li>URL.</li>\n</ul>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>Target Sites :</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://math.stackexchange.com/\">Math</a> : <a href=\"https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6774/community-promotion-ads-2013\">2013 Thread</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://electronics.stackexchange.com/\">Electronics</a> : <a href=\"https://electronics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2515/community-promotion-ads-2013\">2013 Thread</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://security.stackexchange.com/\">IT Security</a> : <a href=\"https://security.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1085/community-promotion-ads-2013\">2013 Thread</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/\">Theoretical CS</a> : <a href=\"https://cstheory.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1619/community-promotion-ads-2013\">2013 Thread</a></li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>Other possible sites :</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://photo.stackexchange.com/\">https://photo.stackexchange.com/</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://diy.stackexchange.com/\">https://diy.stackexchange.com/</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/\">https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://unix.stackexchange.com/\">https://unix.stackexchange.com/</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://serverfault.com/\">https://serverfault.com/</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://superuser.com/\">https://superuser.com/</a> </li>\n</ul>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>I suggest that whichever post gets >=6 votes, and is the maximum voted post, be used.</p>\n\n<p><strong>And we have a <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/a/192/189\">winner</a>!</strong></p>\n\n<p>Does that mean this thread is over? Of course, not! </p>\n\n<p>The more ideas we have, the more ads we can put across the network. So, dont hesitate to post.  </p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p><sub>Post taken from <a href=\"https://mathematica.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/160/what-would-be-a-good-community-promotion-ad\">Mathematica Meta</a></sub></p>\n",
        "Title": "Our Community Promotion Ads",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-promotion|",
        "Answer": "<p>I am very bad at making pictures, but what about a picture of a magnifying glass on a bunch of lines of code. And, through the magnifying glass we can see the hexadecimal code ? Something like this (but better shaped):</p>\n\n<p><img src=\"https://i.stack.imgur.com/r3Ow0.png\" alt=\"logo1\"></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "200",
        "CreationDate": "2013-05-04T02:24:28.300",
        "Body": "<p>Questions can be <em>closed</em>.</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>What does it mean for a question to be closed?</li>\n<li>Who can close a question?</li>\n<li>What are the reasons for closing a question?</li>\n<li>What if multiple close reasons are used on a question?</li>\n<li>Is closure the end of the road for a question?</li>\n<li>When are closed questions eligible for deletion?</li>\n</ul>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p><strong>Related Questions on Meta Stack Overflow</strong><br>\n  <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19126/how-do-you-challenge-the-closing-of-one-of-your-questions\">How do you challenge the closing of one of your questions?</a><br>\n  <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5215/etiquette-for-closing-your-own-questions\">Etiquette for closing your own questions</a><br>\n  <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/36415/how-do-you-reopen-a-closed-question\">How do you reopen a closed question?</a><br>\n  <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/98022/how-soon-should-i-vote-to-close\">How soon should I \"vote to close\"?</a></p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p><sub>Taken from <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10582/what-is-a-closed-question\">MSO</a></sub></p>\n",
        "Title": "What is a \u201cclosed\u201d question?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|faq|closed-questions|close-reasons|",
        "Answer": "<h2>What does it mean for a question to be <em>closed</em>?</h2>\n\n<p>When a question is closed, no additional answers may be posted to it, although the question and existing answers can still be edited (by users with edit privileges) and voted upon, and will continue to count for badges.  The asker of a closed question may still accept an answer.  Questions that are particularly bad should be flagged for moderator attention so they can be closed quickly.</p>\n\n<p><strong>Closed questions can be re-opened</strong> by users who have sufficient reputation.</p>\n\n<h2>Who can close a question?</h2>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Users with at least 250 rep may vote to close their own questions</li>\n<li>Users with at least 500 may vote to close any questions.</li>\n<li>Moderators may close any question (regardless of their reputation)</li>\n<li>The same users who can vote to close questions can also vote to reopen them</li>\n</ul>\n\n<h3>What are the limits for 500+ rep users?</h3>\n\n<ul>\n<li>24 votes to close per day</li>\n<li>5 votes are required to close or reopen\n\n<li>Votes will expire after 4 days if the question does not reach 5 votes \n--></li>\n<li>Questions containing a bounty cannot be closed</li>\n<li>You can only vote to close once per question</li>\n<li>You can only vote to reopen once per question</li>\n</ul>\n\n<h2>What are the reasons for closing a question?</h2>\n\n<p>When closing a question, a reason must be provided for the action. If none of the reasons for closing the question apply, you should strongly reconsider voting to close.</p>\n\n<p>Questions in these categories <em>may</em> be closed:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><p><strong>Exact duplicate:</strong> Questions that cover exactly the same ground as earlier questions on this topic should be closed. See <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10841/how-to-handle-duplicate-questions\">How to handle duplicate questions?</a>  </p></li>\n<li><p><strong>Off-topic:</strong> Questions are generally expected to be on-topic for the site, in accordance with the site <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/faq\">faq</a>.</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Belongs on [another site]:</strong> Questions that are unrelated to the site topic, and would fit better on another site in the Stack Exchange network. <br><br></li>\n</ul></li>\n<li><p><strong>Not constructive:</strong> \"This question is not a good fit to our Q&amp;A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion.\" </p>\n\n<p>For more about what makes a question Not Constructive, see <a href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/11/qa-is-hard-lets-go-shopping/\">QA is Hard, Let's Go Shopping</a>, <a href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/08/gorilla-vs-shark/\">Gorilla vs. Shark.</a>, and <a href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/01/stack-overflow-where-we-hate-fun/\">We Hate Fun Here</a>.</p></li>\n<li><p><strong>Not a real question:</strong> \"It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.\"</p>\n\n<p>For more information, see <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/145677\">What is a Real Question</a> and <a href=\"http://mattgemmell.com/2008/12/08/what-have-you-tried/\" rel=\"nofollow noreferrer\">What Have You Tried</a>.</p></li>\n<li><p><strong>Too localized:</strong> \"This question is unlikely to ever help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet.\"</p>\n\n<p>For more information, see <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4818\">What questions should be closed with reason \u201ctoo localized\u201d</a>.</p></li>\n</ul>\n\n<h2>What if multiple close reasons are used on a question?</h2>\n\n<p>If a moderator participates in the closure, the reason the moderator selects is displayed. Otherwise, the question gets closed with the most frequently given reason. If there is a tie, the latest reason is used. However, if multiple potential duplicates were suggested, all of them will be displayed in the automatically generated \"possible duplicates\" box.</p>\n\n<p>For more information on the etiquette around closing questions:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5215/etiquette-for-closing-your-own-questions\">Etiquette for closing your own questions</a></li>\n</ul>\n\n<h2>Is closure the end of the road for a question?</h2>\n\n<p><strong>Definitely not</strong>. Closed questions can and should be edited to improve them and address the reasons why they were closed in the first place. Once this is done you might need to either flag the question for moderator attention or raise a meta question to bring it to everyone's attention so it can get the necessary views that might translate into reopen votes.</p>\n\n<p>It's only when a question can't be salvaged that it should move onto the next state - deletion.</p>\n\n<h2>When are closed questions eligible for deletion?</h2>\n\n<p>Closed questions become eligible for deletion by the community after 48 hours, but users with 2K reputation or more are not subject to this restriction.  <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5221\">See here</a> for the rules governing question deletion.  See also <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1867\">Do closed questions ever get deleted?</a></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "209",
        "CreationDate": "2013-05-17T13:47:21.003",
        "Body": "<p>The tag <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ida\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ida&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ida</a> is a synonym for <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro</a>, so there should only be questions tagged <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro</a>. However, as the tag page reveals, there are three questions tagged <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ida\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ida&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ida</a>. <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/87/\">1</a> <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/1646/\">3</a></p>\n\n<p>How does this happen, despite these tags being synonyms?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Questions exist tagged 'ida' and 'idapro'",
        "Tags": "|bug|status-completed|tag-synonyms|",
        "Answer": "<p>Poof! They are gone. </p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>On a serious note, that is normal behavior. Those questions were tagged with <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ida\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ida&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ida</a> <em>before</em> the synonym relation to <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro</a> was made. Tag synonyms affect future associations, whereas past tagging needs to be handled explicitly/manually.  I just did the retags.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "212",
        "CreationDate": "2013-05-23T12:52:57.713",
        "Body": "<p>The irritating thing about it is that apparently <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/users/60/igor-skochinsky\">Igor</a> was the one to introduce the synonym. As he points out in this comment to another <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/q/209/245\">meta question</a>:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Actually, the official name of the program (since a few years ago) is just \"IDA\". \"IDA Professional\" is what was previously called \"IDA Pro Advanced\".</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>Considering there is IDA Professional, IDA Starter and a freeware version it would make more sense to call all of them \"IDA\" (<a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ida\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ida&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ida</a>) instead of \"IDA Pro\" (<a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro</a>) which refers to a single edition out of three possibilities. In short: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ida\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ida&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ida</a> is a superset of <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro</a> and should be the one to use, unless we want to add other tags for the starter and freeware editions of IDA.</p>\n\n<p>I know this is probably not going to be popular with the moderators, perhaps not with Igor either, but as a matter of fact it would be:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>more correct</li>\n<li>shorter</li>\n<li>more inclusive</li>\n</ul>\n",
        "Title": "ida versus idapro tags ... the synonym should be the exact inverse, because it's not strictly synonymous",
        "Tags": "|discussion|status-completed|tags|tag-synonyms|",
        "Answer": "<p>I had a look at the IDA website, and the software comes in three versions as stated in the question, freeware, IDA Starter and IDA Professsional. IDA seems to be the correct tag that encompasses all these. Hence, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ida\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ida&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ida</a> is now the master tag. <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro</a> is the synonym.</p>\n\n<p><em>I havent retagged the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro</a> questions as of now.</em></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "221",
        "CreationDate": "2013-06-01T03:00:58.910",
        "Body": "<p>We all love <a href=\"http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com\">Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange</a>, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's never seen it before, and see how we stack up against the rest of the 'Net.</p>\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/review/site-eval\">Site Self-Evaluation review queue</a> is open and populated with 10 questions that were asked and answered in the last quarter. Run a few Google searches to see how easy they are to find and compare the answers we have with the information available on other sites.</p>\n\n<p>Rating the questions is only a part of the puzzle, though. Do you see a pattern of questions that should have been closed but are not? Questions or answers that could use an edit? Anything that's going really well? <strong>Post an answer below to share your thoughts</strong> and discuss these questions and the site's health with your fellow users!</p>\n",
        "Title": "Let's get critical: Jun 2013 Site Self-Evaluation",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-evaluation|",
        "Answer": "<h1>Final Results</h1>\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1909/how-to-display-memory-zones-content-on-ida-pro\">How to display memory zones content on IDA Pro?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 7</strong> (Excellent: 7, Satisfactory: 8, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1531/what-is-overlapping-instructions-obfuscation\">What is &quot;overlapping instructions&quot; obfuscation?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 10</strong> (Excellent: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1686/how-to-detect-a-virtualized-environment\">How to detect a virtualized environment?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 6</strong> (Excellent: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1979/how-do-i-see-the-parameters-passed-to-regopenkeyex-and-set-a-conditional-breakp\">How do I see the parameters passed to RegOpenKeyEx, and set a conditional breakpoint?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 10</strong> (Excellent: 10, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1899/creating-ida-pro-debugger-plugins-api-documentation-and-examples\">Creating IDA Pro debugger plugins - API documentation and examples?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 3</strong> (Excellent: 4, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1779/what-are-the-different-types-of-packers\">What are the different types of packers?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 4</strong> (Excellent: 4, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1852/why-does-an-executable-give-an-error-when-opened-in-tool\">Why does an executable give an error when opened in $tool?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 1</strong> (Excellent: 5, Satisfactory: 1, Needs Improvement: 4)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1935/how-to-handle-stripped-binaries-with-gdb-no-source-no-symbols-and-gdb-only-sho\">How to handle stripped binaries with GDB? No source, no symbols and GDB only shows addresses?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 9</strong> (Excellent: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1612/safely-unwinding-the-stack\">How can I check I&#39;ve moved outside the stack without triggering a protection fault?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 2</strong> (Excellent: 4, Satisfactory: 3, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1898/what-is-fault-injection-reverse-engineering-what-are-the-techniques-involved\">What is fault-injection reverse engineering? What are the techniques involved?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 4</strong> (Excellent: 4, Satisfactory: 4, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "225",
        "CreationDate": "2013-06-06T12:05:55.180",
        "Body": "<p><kbd>Take the tour</kbd> is floating at the wrong place.\n<img src=\"https://i.stack.imgur.com/ClnU9.png\" alt=\"\"></p>\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https://i.stack.imgur.com/OIXtW.png\" rel=\"nofollow noreferrer\">position varies</a> by a few pixels from time to time. </p>\n\n<p>My browser is Chromium Version 25.0.1364.160 on Ubuntu 12.04.</p>\n\n<p>Observed on multiple sites which have long blurbs.</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://cogsci.stackexchange.com/helpcenter\">https://cogsci.stackexchange.com/helpcenter</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://russian.stackexchange.com/helpcenter\">https://russian.stackexchange.com/helpcenter</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://spanish.stackexchange.com/helpcenter\">https://spanish.stackexchange.com/helpcenter</a></li>\n</ul>\n",
        "Title": "Incorrect positioning of tour button",
        "Tags": "|bug|status-completed|",
        "Answer": "<p>The blurb has been changed making it of almost constant length for all sites. </p>\n\n<p><img src=\"https://i.stack.imgur.com/iMlLc.png\" alt=\"\"></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "238",
        "CreationDate": "2013-07-07T10:59:13.077",
        "Body": "<p>If you're a Twitter fan and spend time retweeting questions, you may want to consider following @StackReverseEng.</p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://twitter.com/StackReverseEng/\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://twitter.com/StackReverseEng/</a></p>\n\n<p>StackReverseEng is the official Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange Twitter account created by the Stack Exchange team. It's configured to automatically tweet certain questions. It tweets about two posts daily.</p>\n\n<p>This could help expose RE.SE to more of your followers and encourage us all to retweet more questions.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Are you following the official RE Twitter account?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-promotion|community|",
        "Answer": "<p>The event is now over.</p>\n\n<p>Our Twitter account went from having 13 followers to <strong>23</strong> followers during the event! </p>\n\n<p>@StackReverseEng is the second most followed account for all beta sites &lt;1 year old.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "243",
        "CreationDate": "2013-07-19T15:27:24.377",
        "Body": "<p>Currently, the hashtags added by the <a href=\"https://twitter.com/StackReverseEng\" rel=\"nofollow\">Twitter bot</a> is just the most popular tag from the question. In many cases, the tag may be obscure, <a href=\"https://twitter.com/StackReverseEng/status/357848578154184704\" rel=\"nofollow\">too broad</a> (#python) or <a href=\"https://twitter.com/StackReverseEng/status/350600314438688768\" rel=\"nofollow\">different from common usage</a> (#pe -> physical education, private equity).</p>\n\n<p>So, to make the Twitter bot more effective, what should be done?</p>\n",
        "Title": "What can be done to make the Twitter account more effective?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|feature-request|site-promotion|",
        "Answer": "<p>Two solutions that come to my mind are :</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>If possible, an additional hashtag be used <code>#reverseengineering</code></li>\n<li>If not, only  <code>#reverseengineering</code> be used</li>\n</ul>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "247",
        "CreationDate": "2013-08-13T00:51:44.660",
        "Body": "<p>We have a tag <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/career-advice\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;career-advice&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">career-advice</a> with one popular question. Career advice is generally considered a can of worms and is off-topic across the entire Network. The main reason being that this attracts a huge number of low quality localized questions (as they are valid for a specific person/situation).</p>\n\n<p>So, should we make career-advice off-topic as well?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Do we want to give out career-advice?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|scope|",
        "Answer": "<p>I would agree that career advice is probably a bit too noisy and specific to be of much use to anyone but the person asking the question.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "250",
        "CreationDate": "2013-08-17T02:57:42.433",
        "Body": "<ul>\n<li>What is spam?</li>\n<li>I saw a spam post, what should I do? <strong>(Important)</strong></li>\n<li>I saw a spam edit, what should I do?</li>\n<li>How can I help fight spam most effectively?</li>\n</ul>\n",
        "Title": "What should I do on seeing spam?",
        "Tags": "|support|faq|",
        "Answer": "<h2>What is spam?</h2>\n\n<p>Spam is <a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29\" rel=\"nofollow noreferrer\">unsolicited commercial advertisement</a>. Fundamentally, spam tries to sell you something when you didn't ask for anything.</p>\n\n<p>Some spam is after your money. Sometimes it's indirect, such as spam that wants you to visit a website and click on the ads. Some spam wants you to visit a website with malware that may be able to infect your computer. Sometimes spam is after things other than money; political spam is still spam.</p>\n\n<p>Sometimes you'll see posts from broken spam bots that only have the framing but are missing a reference to the brand or site being advertised. Treat them as spam. Stack Exchange has some technical measures designed to limit spam, so the proportion of spams from bot tests rather than from working bots is quite high.</p>\n\n<p>Some things, how ever, are not spam:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>Wildly off-topic questions are not spam. Vote to close, perhaps flag as low quality, but do not flag them as spam.</li>\n<li>Nonsense posts that aren't clearly the product of a bot are not spam. Flag as low quality or \u201cnot an answer\u201d, possibly downvote (and vote to delete if you have that privilege).</li>\n</ul>\n\n<h2>I saw a spam post, what should I do?</h2>\n\n<p><strong>Flag as spam</strong>.</p>\n\n<p>Flagging as spam is the most effective way of dealing with spam. A post that receives 6 spam flags is automatically deleted and locked.</p>\n\n<p>Don't raise a custom flag, select the \u201cit is spam\u201d predefined reason. That gives extra work to moderators as they need to handle the custom flag separately. Moderators see spam flags, and generally react to them by destroying the account.</p>\n\n<p><strong>Don't bother downvoting spam</strong>. It's actually counterproductive for questions as they are taken off the front page if their score drops below -4. A spam flag already reduces the post's score by 1. (But don't upvote either: we don't want to risk giving the spammer privileges, or to say to the quality control system that there is something worth saving on that account.) There's also no need to vote to close a spam question.</p>\n\n<p>Don't edit the post to blank out the spam, except for when the post contains p*rn. This makes it harder for others to notice that the post is spam and must be removed pronto. </p>\n\n<h2>I saw a spam edit, what should I do?</h2>\n\n<p>Most spammers post questions or answers but some try to sneak in spam via edits.</p>\n\n<p>Reject spam edits, or edits that are testing bots, as vandalism. There is currently no separate tracking for spam and other kinds of vandalism.</p>\n\n<p>Pay attention to edits that add links \u2014 most are helpful (adding a link to a paper or to Wikipedia), but occasionally the link is to a spam or phishing or malware site, so check the targets of links when you review suggested edits.</p>\n\n<h2>How can I help fight spam most effectively?</h2>\n\n<p><strong>Flag as spam</strong> and move on. Really, that's the most helpful thing.</p>\n\n<p>There is one other thing: if other people with a Stack Exchange account are around (in real life, or in <a href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/\">chat</a>), you might ask them to flag as well, especially in the slow hours when there are few people around on the site. Anyone with 15 reputation can flag. If you have 200 reputation on one Stack Exchange site, you get an association bonus which is sufficient to raise flags on any site (if you've never interacted with that site before, you'll need to create an account on that site by clicking the \u201clogin\u201d button).</p>\n\n<p><sub>Thanks to <a href=\"https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/q/686/2044\">Gilles on CS Meta</a>.</sub></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "252",
        "CreationDate": "2013-08-30T03:01:00.390",
        "Body": "<p>We all love <a href=\"http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com\">Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange</a>, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's never seen it before, and see how we stack up against the rest of the 'Net.</p>\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/review/site-eval\">Site Self-Evaluation review queue</a> is open and populated with 10 questions that were asked and answered in the last quarter. Run a few Google searches to see how easy they are to find and compare the answers we have with the information available on other sites.</p>\n\n<p>Rating the questions is only a part of the puzzle, though. Do you see a pattern of questions that should have been closed but are not? Questions or answers that could use an edit? Anything that's going really well? <strong>Post an answer below to share your thoughts</strong> and discuss these questions and the site's health with your fellow users!</p>\n",
        "Title": "Let's get critical: Aug 2013 Site Self-Evaluation",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-evaluation|",
        "Answer": "<h1>Final Results</h1>\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2394/how-can-i-change-the-read-write-execute-flags-on-a-segment-in-ida\">How can I change the Read/Write/Execute flags on a segment in IDA?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 11</strong> (Excellent: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2425/how-to-get-virus-body-of-polymorphic-malware\">How to get virus body of Polymorphic Malware</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 6</strong> (Excellent: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2441/unable-to-set-a-breakpoint-in-ida-6\">Unable to set a breakpoint in IDA 6?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 1</strong> (Excellent: 2, Satisfactory: 10, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2468/hook-end-middle-of-function\">Hook end/middle of function</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 8</strong> (Excellent: 8, Satisfactory: 4, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2412/is-there-any-tool-which-parses-ollydbg-run-trace\">Is there any tool which parses ollydbg run trace?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 4</strong> (Excellent: 4, Satisfactory: 7, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2420/what-are-nullsub-functions-in-ida\">What are nullsub_ functions in IDA?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 9</strong> (Excellent: 10, Satisfactory: 0, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2474/reversing-network-protocol\">Reversing network protocol</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 1</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2498/modifying-step-value-that-affects-xmm-float-value\">Modifying step value that affects xmm# float value</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 1</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2440/mixed-16-32-bit-code-reversing-using-ida\">Mixed 16/32-bit code reversing using IDA</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 7</strong> (Excellent: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2458/reverse-engineering-a-vc-video-game\">Reverse engineering a VC++ video game</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 0</strong> (Excellent: 2, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "255",
        "CreationDate": "2013-09-06T09:46:33.127",
        "Body": "<p>Reverse Engineering is clearly a 'gray'-area with law. Thus this is why I wonder, what to do when you detect a string of questions or a single questions that is clearly leading to mal-behaviour. </p>\n",
        "Title": "Detecting malicious behaviour",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>I <a href=\"https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/a/10926/70968\">posted an answer on A51</a> regarding a similar issue with the TOR proposal. That answer largely covers the same ground. </p>\n\n<p>Basically, unless a question itself is mentioning or linking to something that can be construed to be illegal or immoral, then moderators <strong>may</strong> act on it. However, in most cases, questions may not directly imply an illegal activity and it would be more a matter of <em>judging</em> intent. </p>\n\n<p>Intent is, quite rightly, not mentioned at all in the TOS, and hence, moderators or users cannot reasonably act (delete) on the basis of perceived intent alone (You are however free to comment and downvote as needed). In such cases, the post is treated as normal and we defer to the Community Team's decision, <em>if at all the situation so demands</em>.</p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>Just to be explicitly clear, everybody is welcome to comment, clarify and vote on such questions howsoever they feel, to bring out the intended use case/scenario. Moderators however, cannot <em>unilaterally</em> act (delete, close) against such posts for reasons of possible intent. </p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "267",
        "CreationDate": "2013-11-28T03:01:12.163",
        "Body": "<p>We all love <a href=\"http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com\">Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange</a>, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's never seen it before, and see how we stack up against the rest of the 'Net.</p>\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/review/site-eval\">Site Self-Evaluation review queue</a> is open and populated with 10 questions that were asked and answered in the last quarter. Run a few Google searches to see how easy they are to find and compare the answers we have with the information available on other sites.</p>\n\n<p>Rating the questions is only a part of the puzzle, though. Do you see a pattern of questions that should have been closed but are not? Questions or answers that could use an edit? Anything that's going really well? <strong>Post an answer below to share your thoughts</strong> and discuss these questions and the site's health with your fellow users!</p>\n",
        "Title": "Let's get critical: Nov 2013 Site Self-Evaluation",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-evaluation|",
        "Answer": "<h1>Final Results</h1>\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2964/which-calling-convention-to-use-for-eax-edx-in-ida\">Which calling convention to use for EAX/EDX in IDA</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 5</strong> (Excellent: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2869/how-does-sysenter-work-under-linux\">How to use sysenter under Linux?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 4</strong> (Excellent: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2904/are-those-code-snippets-and-file-paths-in-a-c-binary-some-sort-of-standard-deb\">Are those code snippets and file paths in a C++ binary some sort of standard debug information?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 3</strong> (Excellent: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2917/deal-with-obfuscated-assembly\">Deal with obfuscated assembly</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 2</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2913/inserting-resources-properties-file-into-an-apk-language-compatibility\">Inserting resources.properties file into an APK - language compatibility</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 2</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2923/what-does-this-memory-pattern-pointing-from-the-thread-local-storage-mean\">What does this memory pattern pointing from the thread-local storage mean?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 2</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2940/storing-barcodes-as-ascii\">Storing barcodes as ASCII</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 1</strong> (Excellent: 2, Satisfactory: 3, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2864/moving-from-windows-to-linux-for-malware-analysis-what-should-i-consider\">Moving from Windows to Linux for Malware analysis. What should I consider?</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 0</strong> (Excellent: 2, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2966/some-programs-have-always-same-addressing-and-some-different\">Some programs have always same addressing and some different</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 0</strong> (Excellent: 2, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2916/how-to-find-file-compression-or-obfuscation-type\">How to find file compression or obfuscation type</a></p>\n<p><strong>Net Score: -3</strong> (Excellent: 0, Satisfactory: 3, Needs Improvement: 3)</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "270",
        "CreationDate": "2013-12-09T13:38:40.567",
        "Body": "<p>Just now, I have edited a question of type \"<a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3153/decompiling-this-i386-assembler-program-in-c\"><em>Decompile this assembler code</em></a>\".</p>\n\n<p>It is not the first one and it will not be the last one...</p>\n\n<p>I know that, whatever we do, we will encounter this kind of question a lot. So, there is absolutely no way to fight against. But, at least, is there some recommendations, ways to handle it, specific tags to add to it, to make it easier to browse in and relevant as an answer ?</p>\n\n<p>Any ideas, comments, or opinion about this issue is more than welcome ! (I, personally, have no real ideas on what is the best way to handle it... my only certainty is that it will come again and again with no possible way to avoid it).</p>\n",
        "Title": "What to do with questions of type \"Decompile this assembler code\"?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>Binaries have protection.  Source code has protection, but not as much as the binary.  Disassemblies are smart guesses.  You can't take a disassembly from IDA or objdump and recover a working program.  You equally can't recover the source.  RE has more than enough plausible deniability.  </p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "275",
        "CreationDate": "2013-12-20T18:18:55.283",
        "Body": "<p>What are the rules and question Limitations in Reverse Engineering?</p>\n\n<p>Some Questions seems to ask for help in cracking. Is that legitimate? Are we allowed to answer him even if he specifies the program which is working on?</p>\n\n<p>Hope you got the point</p>\n",
        "Title": "Question Limitations",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>See <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/help/asking\">https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/help/asking</a></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "279",
        "CreationDate": "2014-02-26T03:01:17.123",
        "Body": "<p>We all love <a href=\"http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com\">Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange</a>, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's never seen it before, and see how we stack up against the rest of the 'Net.</p>\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/review/site-eval\">Site Self-Evaluation review queue</a> is open and populated with 10 questions that were asked and answered in the last quarter. \nRun a few Google searches to see how easy they are to find and compare the answers we have with the information available on other sites.</p>\n\n<p>Rating the questions is only a part of the puzzle, though. Do you see a pattern of questions that should have been closed but are not? Questions or answers that could use an edit? Anything that's going really well? <strong>Post an answer below to share your thoughts</strong> and discuss these questions and the site's health with your fellow users!</p>\n",
        "Title": "Let's get critical: Feb 2014 Site Self-Evaluation",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-evaluation|",
        "Answer": "<h1>Final Results</h1>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3435/why-ida-pro-generated-a-j-printf-function-call\">Why IDA Pro generated a &quot;j_printf&quot; function call?</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 5</strong> (Excellent: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3498/detecting-recursive-functions-in-ida\">Detecting recursive functions in IDA</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 5</strong> (Excellent: 5, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3352/ida-pro-only-recognizes-my-files-as-binary\">IDA Pro only recognizes my files as BINARY</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 3</strong> (Excellent: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3367/what-is-the-format-of-this-date-time\">What is the format of this date time?</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 2</strong> (Excellent: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3354/decompiling-modem-firmware-firmware-bin-with-unknown-results-on-binwalk\">Decompiling Modem Firmware (firmware.bin) with unknown results on binwalk</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 2</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 3, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3388/ida-pro-converting-to-instruction-functionality-how-to-automate\">IDA Pro converting to instruction functionality: how to automate.</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 2</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3526/how-do-i-extract-a-copy-of-an-unknown-firmware-from-a-hardware-device\">How do I extract a copy of an unknown firmware from a hardware device?</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 1</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3430/should-i-switch-from-windbg-to-ollydbg\">Should I switch from WinDbg to OllyDbg?</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 0</strong> (Excellent: 1, Satisfactory: 5, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3559/retrieving-encryption-encoding-logic-from-dll\">Retrieving encryption/encoding logic from dll</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: -2</strong> (Excellent: 1, Satisfactory: 2, Needs Improvement: 3)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3348/patchdiff2-outputting-results-to-a-text-file\">PatchDiff2 Outputting results to a Text File</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: -2</strong> (Excellent: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Needs Improvement: 3)</p>\n<hr />\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "290",
        "CreationDate": "2014-06-04T05:25:05.663",
        "Body": "<p>I would like to have added <code>[mips]</code>as a new tag:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>as quite a number of questions show up when you search for <code>mips</code> - 41 currently, although I think some might not fit under the spirit of such a tag</li>\n<li>there is a tag for <code>[x86]</code>, which has 47 questions tagged currently</li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>if I click on 'Improve Tag Wiki'  for an existing tag I get:</p>\n\n<p><code>You do not yet have tag wiki edit privileges. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.</code>, which is expected, but if I enter a non-existent tag from the TAGS page there is no button or prompt to add a new tag.</p>\n\n<p>I just attempted to add on a single question as an edit, so perhaps it needs to be peer reviewed first.  </p>\n\n<p>I guess my question is, how can I propose the description / edit for the tag wiki for a new tag if I can't see it yet because it is waiting for peer review?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Tag wiki for MIPS assembly / disassembly, etc",
        "Tags": "|discussion|tags|",
        "Answer": "<p>Makes sense in my opinion. We have x86, ARM.. I approved one of your edits.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "295",
        "CreationDate": "2014-08-25T03:01:24.577",
        "Body": "<p>We all love <a href=\"http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com\">Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange</a>, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's never seen it before, and see how we stack up against the rest of the 'Net.</p>\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/review/site-eval\">Site Self-Evaluation review queue</a> is open and populated with 10 questions that were asked and answered in the last quarter. \nRun a few Google searches to see how easy they are to find and compare the answers we have with the information available on other sites.</p>\n\n<p>Rating the questions is only a part of the puzzle, though. Do you see a pattern of questions that should have been closed but are not? Questions or answers that could use an edit? Anything that's going really well? <strong>Post an answer below to share your thoughts</strong> and discuss these questions and the site's health with your fellow users!</p>\n",
        "Title": "Let's get critical: Aug 2014 Site Self-Evaluation",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-evaluation|",
        "Answer": "<h1>Final Results</h1>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/5890/why-did-the-program-entry-point-become-sub-esp-1c\">Why did the program entry point become &#39;sub esp, 1C&#39;?</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 9</strong> (Excellent: 9, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/5874/adding-another-section-to-an-idb-file\">Adding another section to an idb file</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 7</strong> (Excellent: 7, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/5830/how-to-identify-functions-in-a-stripped-binary-on-x86-32bit\">How to identify functions in a stripped binary on x86 32bit?</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 6</strong> (Excellent: 6, Satisfactory: 8, Needs Improvement: 0)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/4817/dumping-firmware-through-mtdblock-device\">Dumping firmware through mtdblock device</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 5</strong> (Excellent: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/5923/who-does-construct-the-stack-on-process-creation-in-windows\">Who does construct the stack on process creation in Windows?</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 4</strong> (Excellent: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/5851/interacting-with-command-line-programs-in-hopper-disassembler-mac-os-10-9\">Interacting with command line programs in Hopper disassembler (Mac OS 10.9)</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 3</strong> (Excellent: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Needs Improvement: 2)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/4792/decompiling-windows-photo-viewer\">Decompiling windows photo viewer</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 2</strong> (Excellent: 5, Satisfactory: 5, Needs Improvement: 3)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/4703/win7-aslr-bypass\">Win7 ASLR bypass</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: 1</strong> (Excellent: 2, Satisfactory: 11, Needs Improvement: 1)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/4824/modifying-a-binary-save-data-file-for-a-video-game-with-a-crc-checksum-check\">Modifying a binary save-data file for a video game with a CRC/Checksum check</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: -1</strong> (Excellent: 3, Satisfactory: 6, Needs Improvement: 4)</p>\n<hr />\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/5898/how-are-dylib-files-laid-out\">How are dylib files laid out</a></li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Net Score: -2</strong> (Excellent: 1, Satisfactory: 9, Needs Improvement: 3)</p>\n<hr />\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "297",
        "CreationDate": "2014-11-14T13:08:00.430",
        "Body": "<p>On both <a href=\"http://stackoverflow.com\">StackOverflow</a> and at the healthy beta <a href=\"http://crypto.stackexchange.com\">Cryptography</a> we get a lot of questions about decryption of a certain ciphertext. Sometimes they are just base 64 blocks, but often there is a bit more to it than that. On neither site they are on topic.</p>\n\n<p>Do you allow such questions or are they considered off topic? If they are on-topic, what would be the minimal requirements for said questions? Note that there would be quite a few persons that have a ciphertext because of a hack or because they just want to decrypt a random binary.</p>\n\n<p>Strictly optional question: If they are off topic, would you know a place where they could be posted instead?</p>\n\n<p>Anyway, good luck with the beta!</p>\n",
        "Title": "Decryption of ciphertext",
        "Tags": "|discussion|questions|migration|",
        "Answer": "<p>I think posting ciphertext is totally fine. If we want to develop techniques to decode/decrypt/deobfuscate, we will need diverse examples.</p>\n<p>You have some unknown binary data and you don't know what it is?</p>\n<p>If this isn't the forum for it, what is?</p>\n<p>I find it more than a little humorous that xoring 4 bytes across a stream makes IDA users lose their chill.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "299",
        "CreationDate": "2015-01-08T07:33:35.757",
        "Body": "<p>At times I close vote a question because it belongs on another site within the SE network. Most of the time it belongs on SO and there's a default entry in the menu under <code>offtopic</code> -> <code>question on SW dev belong at SO</code>. </p>\n\n<p>However sometimes it belongs on the <code>crypto</code> or <code>unix</code> (or another one) sites. Looking at the close voting menu I see just 2 options. </p>\n\n<ol>\n<li>Offtopic because -> Question belongs on another site in the SE network -> belongs on meta.reverseengineering.com</li>\n<li>Offtopic because -> Other -> <code>&lt;your own comment&gt;</code></li>\n</ol>\n\n<p>The first choice, although sounding like the right one, only gives me 1 option to choose from. I don't see how I add custom menu entry there. This leaves only the second option and writing a custom message. </p>\n\n<p>What is the right/preferred way of close voting while suggesting other sites within the SE network?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Closing and suggesting other sites within SE network (not SO)",
        "Tags": "|support|",
        "Answer": "<p>If there is no option for users with closing privileges to migrate a question to specific site, the way to get a question migrated to some site is to flag this question for moderator attention with \"Other\" flag (\"This question belongs to {site}, because...\") - you are right about your second option. Moderators will have an ability to migrate this question.</p>\n\n<p>Your flag, however, can be declined if the moderator who reviewed it felt inappropriate to migrate this question.</p>\n\n<p>Another way would be to raise a meta-question to discuss if the question you want to be migrated is really off-topic there (moderators will see your question most likely).</p>\n\n<p>And please don't request migration / migrate of crap.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "301",
        "CreationDate": "2015-02-22T03:02:35.487",
        "Body": "<p>We all love <a href=\"http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com\">Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange</a>, but there is a whole world of people out there who need answers to their questions and don't even know that this site exists. When they arrive from Google, what will their first impression be? Let's try to look at this site through the eyes of someone who's never seen it before, and see how we stack up against the rest of the 'Net.</p>\n\n<p>The <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/review/site-eval\">Site Self-Evaluation review queue</a> is open and populated with 10 questions that were asked and answered in the last quarter. \nRun a few Google searches to see how easy they are to find and compare the answers we have with the information available on other sites.</p>\n\n<p>Rating the questions is only a part of the puzzle, though. Do you see a pattern of questions that should have been closed but are not? Questions or answers that could use an edit? Anything that's going really well? <strong>Post an answer below to share your thoughts</strong> and discuss these questions and the site's health with your fellow users!</p>\n",
        "Title": "Let's get critical: Feb 2015 Site Self-Evaluation",
        "Tags": "|discussion|site-evaluation|",
        "Answer": "<p>I think that newcomers are treated too harshly. If you disagree with something, by all means down-vote it, but do you really need to down-vote if it is already -9? I would vote to stop the display (though not internal count) at -1.</p>\n\n<p>Anyway, people like to nit-pick and be pedantic, which is both appropriate and fun, but it really hurts morale in some cases.</p>\n\n<p>Sometimes, let things slide, help, don't intimidate and run people off.</p>\n\n<p>EDIT: (now in 2017) - Why have all the questions become about questions themselves, e.g. 'Can I ask this?' or 'Can I ask that'? Sad state of affairs, IMHO. We must have a more inviting community and not be so strict and pedantic.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "310",
        "CreationDate": "2016-01-26T22:58:31.850",
        "Body": "<p>I'd like to explain my dissection of a data dump hold against the code to get another opinion or to check my analysis. Is this on topic or off topic?</p>\n\n<p>I'd show the data dump with markings which bytes or bits describe what in a datastructure while the frame is parsed by the code.</p>\n\n<p>E.g. it might look like this ...</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>This is the data: </p>\n\n<pre><code>00 ff 12 01 22 01 00 00 00 01\n</code></pre>\n  \n  <p><br>\n  This is the code: </p>\n\n<pre><code>int version = readByte();\n\nif (version &gt; 1) {\n    byte flags = readByte(); // read flags as byte\n} else {\n    int len = readWord(); // read next two bytes\n} \n</code></pre>\n  \n  <p>1. Read version:\n  <br></p>\n\n<pre><code>int version = readByte();\n\n[00] ff 12 01 22 01 00 00 00 01 &lt;= version\n</code></pre>\n  \n  <p>2. Read length, since this is version 0:\n  <br></p>\n\n<pre><code>if (version &gt; 1) {\n    byte flags = readByte(); // read flags as byte\n} else {\n    int len = readWord(); // read next two bytes\n} \n\n\n00 [ff 12] 01 22 01 00 00 00 01 &lt;= length: 0x12ff (4863)\n</code></pre>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>And so on ...</p>\n",
        "Title": "Letting you check my analysis of a data dump against the source code - on topic?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>Since you seem to be trying to reverse-engineer a data structure, this looks on-topic too me.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "314",
        "CreationDate": "2016-03-31T20:01:35.867",
        "Body": "<p>I was looking for an answer that involved <code>CallWindowProc</code> and I stumbled upon this <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/4125/what-does-this-call-to-callwindowproc-do\">question</a></p>\n\n<p>Looks like this user has posted the question already knowing the answer, answered it right away (<em>by the look on the timestamps</em>) as a \"different person\", and got upvotes for it.</p>\n\n<p>Maybe it was supposed to be a Community Wiki question. I don't know, just found it weird</p>\n",
        "Title": "Possible reputation abuse",
        "Tags": "|discussion|reputation|",
        "Answer": "<p>The question was answered by the same user and it's <a href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/07/its-ok-to-ask-and-answer-your-own-questions/\">perfectly fine</a> since our goal is to share knowledge and make the internet better, so further users can benefit from it.</p>\n\n<p>See: Help Center > Answering on <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/help/self-answer\">Can I answer my own question?</a></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "316",
        "CreationDate": "2016-04-12T17:33:53.270",
        "Body": "<p>Are questions related to sniffing traffic (tcpdump) or debugging command-line tools are on-topic?</p>\n\n<p>For example tracing php, memcached processes using dtrace or strace?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Are sniffing/debugging questions on-topic?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|scope|",
        "Answer": "<p>It depends on who you happen to encounter to be honest. I would say Yes, but some people are so pedantic that almost nothing seems on-topic. I mean, what kind of community do we have when a person has to ask if their question is on-topic before asking it?</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "318",
        "CreationDate": "2016-08-17T05:59:43.973",
        "Body": "<p>Why is asking about the concepts of a game hardware design is considers to be off topic?</p>\n\n<p>I'm trying to find out the concept of hardware design of a game, which is reverse engineering of the game, I think.</p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/283464/where-to-ask-about-reverse-engineering-of-electronics-of-a-game\">I asked about the most proper SE site to post my question on</a>, and <code>reverseengineering SE</code> sited seemed <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic\">appropriate</a>.</p>\n\n<p>But when I asked <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/13294/reverse-engineering-of-electronics-of-father-io-game\">my question on the site</a>, it received negative votes, which means that it's not on topic question,but why is that?</p>\n\n<p>Why are such questions considered to be off topic, and how can I, <em>if possible</em>, make them on topic questions?</p>\n",
        "Title": "reverse engineering of electronics of games - off topic?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>The hardware RE is most definitely on-topic, as you can check by looking at the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/hardware\">hardware tag</a>.</p>\n\n<p>Negative votes do not necessarily mean \"offtopic\". The close votes so far were for \"too broad\"; not sure I agree with the reason but it's understandable since you don't provide much information. The questions work best when you have something concrete to answer, otherwise you get some vague handwaving answers which do not much help the asker or other visitors.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "322",
        "CreationDate": "2016-09-30T21:57:26.190",
        "Body": "<p>The <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bindiff\">bindiff</a> tag has the following description:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Commercial binary diffing tool sold by Google (formerly zynamics/Sabre)</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>and until recently 9 questions. Out of those, only 4 (<a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/8495/can-i-invoke-idas-plugin-bindiff-from-command-line\">this</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3340/formatting-bindiff-results-to-a-txt\">this</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3373/how-to-format-data-exported-from-bindiff\">this</a> and <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3327/ida-pro-idapython-automation-through-idapython\">this</a>) discuss the actual BinDiff tool, while the other 5 (<a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3352/ida-pro-only-recognizes-my-files-as-binary\">this</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3348/patchdiff2-outputting-results-to-a-text-file\">this</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3507/is-there-any-tool-to-quantitatively-evaluate-the-difference-of-binary\">this</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1475/how-does-bindiff-work\">this</a> and <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2529/reversing-patches-binary-diffing\">this</a>) ask questions related to binary differencing in general. 7 out of the 9 are questions by the same user, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/users/3505/user3119546\">user3119546</a>, and those are <em>all</em> of his questions. He also have 2 answers, one of which is about BinDiff.</p>\n\n<p>I will now remove and retag the <code>bindiff</code> and <code>bin-diffing</code> tags to be faithfully representing the current tag intentions, but I think we should discuss this tag.</p>\n",
        "Title": "bindiff verses bin-diffing tags",
        "Tags": "|discussion|tags|",
        "Answer": "<p>The current name is quite confusing, and I would suggest replacing it with something a bit more clear, such as <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/tool-bindiff\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;tool-bindiff&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">tool-bindiff</a> instead.</p>\n\n<p>Although there's no such convention (and this might justify another discussion), in the particular case of BinDiff the name is actually the same as the action, and perhaps written in a more intuitive manner (compared to <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bin-diffing\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;bin-diffing&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">bin-diffing</a>). IMHO the current tag names make it unclear to users that haven't seen these tags before.</p>\n\n<p><strong>Edit:</strong>\nI've replaced <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bindiff\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;bindiff&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">bindiff</a> with <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/tool-bindiff\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;tool-bindiff&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">tool-bindiff</a>, and copied the updated description from the old tag to the new tag.\nI would now like to remove <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bindiff\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;bindiff&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">bindiff</a> altogether and make it a synonym of <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bin-diffing\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;bin-diffing&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">bin-diffing</a> but it appears I'm unable to do that.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "326",
        "CreationDate": "2016-11-17T21:15:53.757",
        "Body": "<p>I have just asked a question about legacy iPod click wheel games here:</p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/13965/17972\">Reverse Engineering Legacy iPod Click Wheel Games</a></p>\n\n<p>I do not have the required reputation to create an <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ipod\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ipod&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ipod</a> tag just yet.  Could someone with 150+ rep edit my post and create the tag?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Need a tag for Legacy iPod (pre-iOS/touch) questions",
        "Tags": "|discussion|status-completed|tags|",
        "Answer": "<p><a href=\"/questions/tagged/status-completed\" class=\"post-tag moderator-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;status-completed&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">status-completed</a></p>\n\n<p>Igor Skochinsky created the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ipod\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ipod&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ipod</a> tag for my question.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "338",
        "CreationDate": "2017-02-03T08:10:43.630",
        "Body": "<p>There has been discussion about <em>too broad</em> questions here, but we lack the analogon for <em>too narrow</em> questions. Motivation for this question are the comments under <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/14556/can-radare2-support-word-based-architectures\"><em>Can Radare2 support word-based architectures?</em></a>.</p>\n\n<p>Our current guidelines for questions encourage asking specific questions. I never saw StackExchange as a collection of generic answers in the fashion of Tutorials, but I can see some specific answers are only valuable to very few people. Thus, I would like to discuss this question:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Is there something like a 'too narrow' question? And what to do about it?</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>The only statement I could find is about <em>questions about reverse-engineering a specific system</em> are off-topic, unless they show sufficient effort.</p>\n\n<p>In my opinion, even though many of these questions may remain unanswered, answers to questions like these are especially valuable. I hope to see more answers to these questions (e.g. <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/12641/extracting-textures-from-a-file-gamecube-game\">example</a>).</p>\n",
        "Title": "Too 'narrow' questions",
        "Tags": "|discussion|questions|specific-question|",
        "Answer": "<p>Well, actually even your question <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/q/149/245\">was asked before</a> (the way I read it, anyway). The tag <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/specific-question\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;specific-question&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">specific-question</a> seems to be the focal point for the matter.</p>\n\n<p>Your particular example is different, and I have to agree with @SYS_V's comment:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>It could be argued that the radare2 question is more about features of a specific tool/product and less about a reverse engineering problem or concept</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>That said, <em>it doesn't invalidate your other points</em>.</p>\n\n<p>What we should keep in mind, though, and that goes with a statement I made <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/a/157/245\">here</a> (emphasis added):</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Furthermore I think that for a Q&amp;A site <strong>the relevance for the reader</strong> (and future internauts) <strong>needs to be considered as the prime aspect</strong> when decisions are made what to allow and what not.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>... and I think I find that echoed in this statement from your question (emphasis mine):</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>In my opinion, even though many of these questions may remain unanswered, <strong>answers to questions like these are especially valuable</strong>.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>I have to agree. As reverse engineers (\"reversers\") we often struggle to find the pieces of huge puzzle. I have often found myself using the smallest shreds of information I could find to \"get to the next level\" when reverse engineering a target. Be it information about a very similar target, be it <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/18514/245\">clues about an instruction set</a>, be it clues about <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/18698/245\">that library I've never heard about before</a>. Reverse engineering is in no small part the aspect of researching a topic, as an intrinsic part of the craft.</p>\n\n<p>These questions are <em>very</em> specific. But they don't seem to fall into the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask\">don't-ask category</a>, although the effort/understanding isn't always obvious.</p>\n\n<p>Given how narrowly scoped this site already is, we should not always jump at the first chance of closing a question as too specific. Instead we should aim to create value for future internauts by guiding the inquirer (the person asking the question) to scope their question in a way that will encourage answers valuable to others. If the inquirer decides to ignore these efforts from the community, we can still go ahead and close such questions.</p>\n\n<p>Questions such as <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/18550/245\">this one</a> should still be considered off-topic, though. They don't show the effort and are homework-like \"<strong>I</strong> would like to RE this, could <strong>your</strong> do it for me\" style questions.</p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>And as a side-note: I find the notion of <a href=\"https://stackoverflow.blog/2011/01/17/real-questions-have-answers/\">Real Questions Have Answers</a> ambivalent. It's true that real questions have <em>some kind of answer</em>. What's not true is that a question in a very specialized fields with comparably low numbers of experts (when compared to, say, developers) which doesn't have an answer <em>yet</em>, is a bad question.</p>\n\n<p>The distinction here being that while answers <em>exist</em> for real/good questions, it's by no means certain that these answers exist <em>here and now on this Q&amp;A site</em>.</p>\n\n<p>I remember many a case where years after initially dealing with a target, I return to it - or a newer version of it - and happen to crack the puzzle this time. Whenever I have asked a question before and remember/find that, I'll go to the effort of answering it to leave a \"memo\" to myself and others.</p>\n\n<p>Similarly <a href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/a/15117763/476371\">I've found myself answering questions that were years old</a>, because there weren't any answers or the answers were outright dodging the question.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "339",
        "CreationDate": "2017-02-06T10:43:06.213",
        "Body": "<p>Should we use <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/symbols\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;symbols&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">symbols</a> for all questions related with any symbol information?</p>\n\n<p>I think it is too broad for all symbol related operations. It can be used for analysing executable file types, operating systems or understanding linker, loader and compiler mechanisms. </p>\n",
        "Title": "About symbols tag",
        "Tags": "|discussion|tags|",
        "Answer": "<p>Yes, in theory we could add more fine-grained tags but I don't think there are so many questions on the site yet that such distinction is necessary.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "341",
        "CreationDate": "2017-02-13T15:24:15.267",
        "Body": "<p>Today I found out this SE site and browsed a little. A <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/14635/19142\">question</a> caught my interest and while reading the answer, I edited it to improve readability. The edit then went to the approval queue and after that I actually joined the site.</p>\n\n<p>Now the edit is approved, but the attribution is to the \"Community\" user.</p>\n\n<p>Is it possible to retroactively change the user to my proper username?</p>\n\n<p>The intention is that the activity shows in my activity history view when looking at he profile.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Change the edit attribution",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>Alas, this is not possible, sorry. There is no link between your edit (which was accepted before you joined) and your current account. </p>\n\n<p>But I'm sure you'll find other ways to improve the site now that you're a member :)</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "344",
        "CreationDate": "2017-03-07T00:38:06.673",
        "Body": "<p>Currently there are a total of 3,749 questions on this site. On SO there are 2,166 questions tagged \"reverse-engineering\" and on Security.SE there are 122 questions tagged \"reverse-engineering\". Not all are focused specifically on RE but quite a few are. Here are some examples:</p>\n\n<p>From SO:</p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42273311/ida-pro-radare2-ld-preload\">Ida Pro Radare2 LD_PRELOAD</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42069777/is-it-possible-to-extract-function-signatures-from-object-files\">Is it possible to extract function signatures from object files?</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41853729/unable-to-set-breakpoints-in-gdbserver-via-ida\">Unable to set breakpoints in gdbserver via IDA</a>\n<a href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41688624/reading-from-already-open-com-serial-port\">Reading from already open COM (serial) port?</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41633039/protect-python-code-from-reverse-engineering\">protect python code from reverse engineering</a></p>\n\n<p>From Security.SE:</p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/151153/identification-of-tpm-accesses-in-uefi-firmware\">Identification of TPM accesses in UEFI firmware</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/148351/exploitation-eip-refuse-to-jump-to-the-stack-although-its-executable\">Exploitation: EIP refuse to jump to the stack although it's executable</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/134528/volatility-plug-ins-to-investigate-packed-exe-files\">Volatility Plug-ins to investigate packed exe files</a></p>\n\n<p>I've been using this site since roughly December 2016, so I'm not exactly a grizzled veteran, but these exemplars strike me as on topic and focused on or directly involving RE concepts.</p>\n\n<p>I took a look at this question from 2013 about the same kind of thing: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107/is-it-possible-to-migrate-a-question-from-other-stackexchange-sites-to-reverse-e\">Is it possible to migrate a question from other stackexchange sites to Reverse Engineering?</a></p>\n\n<p>This site has been <a href=\"http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/49551/reverse-engineering\">in beta for 1448</a> days now and has unquestionably proficient moderators and an enthusiastic and knowledgeable core group of users. The idea that this site is not \"well established\" simply because it's still in beta strikes me as laughable (unless I am misunderstanding what it means for a site to be \"well established\"). The number one problem seems to be getting more people to ask more questions here.</p>\n\n<p>Here is my question: given that questions from other sites cannot be migrated to a site in beta (like this one), how can the number 1 factor keeping this site in beta - the low number of questions per day - be addressed? It seems like a chicken-and-egg problem: this site needs more questions to get out of beta, but people do not know about this site and so ask on another site, depriving this site of needed traffic (and the person asking an RE question a good answer), and then the question can't be migrated here, keeping the site in beta. Furthermore, due to its technical nature RE is never going be as popular as something more accessible like <a href=\"https://bicycles.stackexchange.com/\">Bicycles</a> or <a href=\"https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/\">Worldbuilding</a>.</p>\n\n<p>Others and myself have commented on people's questions, telling them directly that it would be good idea to ask a RE question here rather than SO or wherever, but it does not seem to do any good. Personally I believe that if a question is on topic for this site and in unanswered, it should be allowed for that question to be migrated here, now that it is 2017 and this site is 4 years old.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Directing users who post RE questions elsewhere on SE to this site and/or migrating questions",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>Following up in Igors explanation there seem to be two solutions:</p>\n\n<ol>\n<li>Get SE to change its offtopic-policy (not likely)</li>\n<li>Make the site more popular, so people may rather ask these questions here</li>\n</ol>\n\n<p>Maybe a feature proposal is the best way:</p>\n\n<p>SE already checks is there were similar questions when you post a question. Principally, the same could be done to check if there may be a SE community better suited for this style of question. In the end, the user can still decide where he wants to post his question, but it may help some people realize there are more specialized communities for the question.</p>\n\n<p>I can see a feature like this helping most smaller SE sites with similar problems.</p>\n\n<p>On the downsite, I'm well aware that this is no trivial task. My proposal is to have moderators of subsites to provide keywords indicating relationships to their community.</p>\n\n<p><strong>edit:</strong></p>\n\n<p>On a site node, I actually think the chat might be essential for the growth of this site. I#ll try to lurk some more...</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "347",
        "CreationDate": "2017-03-14T02:18:28.950",
        "Body": "<p>Edit: just found this question from 2014: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/297/decryption-of-ciphertext\">Decryption of ciphertext</a>. This is essentially an updated version of that question with more data and a request for clarification since there is nothing in the help center specifically about this.</p>\n\n<p>Many of the unanswered questions here are about decoding checksums/CRCs, identifying compression/packing/obfuscation/encryption, decoding file formats etc but I wanted to focus specifically on encryption.</p>\n\n<p>A noticeable proportion of these questions involve presenting either a sample of data or a file alleged to be encrypted in some way with a request for assistance in either identifying the encryption or decrypting it or both. In essence, they are requests for ciphertext analysis.</p>\n\n<p>To be more clear, these questions typically <strong>do not</strong> include the following information:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>identification of the routines or processes involved in generating / encrypting the ciphertext / file</li>\n<li>what application receives the data as input / what processes access the encrypted file</li>\n<li>multiple samples created with different keys</li>\n<li>compression, encoding, encryption libraries present within the system</li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>In other words, a hypothesis is presented in the hope that someone else tests it while at the same withholding information that would arguably be essential to such an endeavor. </p>\n\n<p>Here are some examples:</p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/12965/reversal-of-unknown-obfuscation-or-encryption-with-known-plaintext\">Reversal of unknown obfuscation or encryption with known plaintext</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/14863/reverse-engineering-android-binary-file\">Reverse Engineering Android binary file</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/14253/decrypting-decoding-encrypted-encoded-data\">Decrypting/Decoding encrypted/encoded data</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/3665/how-to-decrypt-this-file\">How to decrypt this file?</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/14219/encrypted-awkward-pngs\">encrypted awkward PNGs</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/9126/file-reverse-engineering-tbl-format\">File reverse engineering - .tbl format</a></p>\n\n<p>There are plenty of questions like this involving compression and checksums as well but I wanted to focus on encryption specifically because a similar issue was addressed on crypto.SE:</p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://crypto.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/100/do-we-want-challenge-analyse-this-questions-and-if-so-what-constraints-if-any\">Do we want \u201cchallenge\u201d/analyse-this questions and if so what constraints, if any, should we put on them?</a></p>\n\n<p>Excerpt from the accepted answer:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>I think any question of the form \u201chere's a bunch of bytes, how do I break them\u201d should be summarily closed. This blanket ban could be mentioned in the FAQ.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>From the crypto.SE <a href=\"https://crypto.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic\">Help Center</a>:\n<a href=\"https://i.stack.imgur.com/hliNL.png\" rel=\"nofollow noreferrer\"><img src=\"https://i.stack.imgur.com/hliNL.png\" alt=\"No\"></a></p>\n\n<p><strong>Edit</strong>: For comparison purposes, here are examples of questions involving problems with encryption in which enough information was provided to arrive at an answer (note: some did not initially provide enough information to be solvable and more information had to be requested):</p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/13483/having-keys-and-binary-how-do-i-reverse-decrypt-a-stream-encryption\">Having keys and binary, how do I reverse/decrypt a stream encryption?</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/12757/help-deciphering-binary-that-creates-3-passwords\">Help deciphering binary that creates 3 passwords</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/13475/how-can-i-determine-if-a-piece-of-code-is-an-encryption-algorithm?rq=1\">How can I determine if a piece of code is an encryption algorithm?</a></p>\n\n<p><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/6945/identify-a-decryption-scheme?rq=1\">Identify a decryption scheme</a></p>\n\n<p><strong>Argument: RE != cryptanalysis</strong></p>\n\n<p>One does not need to be a pro to know that encryption of \"malware\" is a major issue in analysis. Additionally, vulnerability analysis of software (IoT device firmware, for example) can be complicated by encryption. Many more examples can be given. Clearly then dealing with encryption can be significant component in the process reverse engineering software/a system of interest. However, reverse engineering is not synonymous with cryptanalysis. \"Reverse engineering\" should not imply \"reverse engineering  how a supposedly encrypted binary blob is encrypted by looking at the ciphertext and nothing else\". Currently some conflate the two.</p>\n\n<p><strong>Request: clarification</strong></p>\n\n<p>Should all manner of \"reverse this encrypted data\" / \"analyze this ciphertext\" questions be considered \"on topic\"? If not, what criteria should a question involving encrypted data meet in order for it to be considered \"on topic\" for this site?</p>\n\n<p>This could be extended to include \"reverse this checksum\" / \"how is this file compressed?\" type questions as well.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Should questions to the effect of \"How do I decrypt this file/data?\" be considered on-topic?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>I don't have a specific suggestion just yet, but I think that improving the first custom close reason or adding another, more specific one, could alleviate the issue of the questions lacking info (not just crypto ones). For the history of it see <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/a/271/60\">this answer</a></p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "354",
        "CreationDate": "2017-07-05T14:47:23.400",
        "Body": "<p><strong>Question</strong>: is the definition correct? If not, what should the correct definition be?</p>\n\n<p>Here is the definition:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Dynamic linking is the process of resolving at runtime a program's external function calls or dependencies. It is usually performed at compile time by the linker.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>This definition seems to be wildly incorrect - the second sentence, itself incorrect, contradicts the first.</p>\n\n<p>The impression I am under regarding how things work in terms of binary creation and process creation can be summarized by the following (GCC + x86 Linux environment):</p>\n\n<p><code>preprocessing -&gt; compilation (compile time) -&gt; assembly -&gt; linking (link time)</code></p>\n\n<p>then</p>\n\n<p><code>execve (user space) -&gt; exec (kernel) -&gt; dynamic linker -&gt; process (user space)</code></p>\n\n<p>Since I don't know anything about dynamic linking in the context of other systems such as MS Windows and since the definition needs to be sufficiently generic, I am not in a position where I can suggest a new, correct and broadly applicable definition.</p>\n\n<p>For reference, this question was prompted by some documentation I read over in order to answer <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/15758/could-not-find-ld-linux-x86-64-so-2-in-strace-output\">Could not find ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 in strace output</a></p>\n",
        "Title": "Question about definition for tag \"dynamic-linking\"",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>You are right, that definition is incorrect because the second sentence contradicts the first. Who knows how the author got it wrong. Maybe he was distracted or thinking of something else. Maybe it was a copy and paste accident, but definitely it can be most simply corrected by deleting the second sentence.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "357",
        "CreationDate": "2018-02-01T18:46:08.740",
        "Body": "<p>This question was prompted by a comment to a question in another discussion on EE.SE <a href=\"https://electronics.meta.stackexchange.com/a/6480/29434\">here</a>.</p>\n\n<p>From the tour page of this site I read (emphasis mine): </p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Reverse Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site <strong>for researchers and developers</strong> who explore the principles <strong>of a computer system</strong> through analysis of its structure, function, and operation.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>From that I infer that this site allows only questions with a certain degree of professionalism and that, consequently, questions by mere enthusiasts or hobbyists are discouraged (assuming the hobbyists doesn't formulate a question showing a sufficient degree of expertise, like what is expected from a professional in the field).</p>\n\n<p>Is my inference right?</p>\n\n<p>In particular, for example, would a question from an hobbyist about reverse engineering the circuit of a cheap, china-made, microcontroller board of unknown brand like those usually found on Amazon or eBay be on-topic here?</p>\n",
        "Title": "Are questions from hobbyists, makers and enthusiasts on-topic?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|scope|",
        "Answer": "<p>Beginners, enthusiasts and hobbyists are all welcomed in our community. Frankly, some of the most active users in our community enjoy reverse engineering as their hobby and this is not their profession. \"Researchers\" is a term that have more than one definition. As I sees it, people that are trying to reverse engineer a \"cheap, china-made, microcontroller board of unknown brand\" are considered researchers, even if they don't have tons of experience and a \"Researcher\" on their shiny tag title.</p>\n\n<p>Reverse-engineering is a broad subject and so can be the questions in our site, as long as they related to RE and considered good questions. When one asks a good question which demonstrates that this person thoroughly searched for an answer before clicking the \"Ask\" button, we will do our best to help. There are very talented members in our community with vast amount of knowledge about different subjects regarding to RE.</p>\n\n<h2>What considered good questions?</h2>\n\n<p><strong>The question should be on topic</strong><br>\nsource: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic\">What topics can I ask about here?</a></p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>If you have a question about ...</p>\n  \n  <ul>\n  <li>software analysis (static or dynamic)</li>\n  <li>disassembly or decompilation</li>\n  <li>hardware analysis and testing</li>\n  <li>tools commonly used for reverse engineering hardware or software</li>\n  <li>deterring reverse engineering efforts</li>\n  </ul>\n  \n  <p>and it is not about ...</p>\n  \n  <ul>\n  <li>performance evaluation</li>\n  <li>performance testing software</li>\n  <li>forward engineering (hardware construction, software creation)</li>\n  <li>bug hunting (debugging) during software development</li>\n  </ul>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p><strong>Be specific</strong><br>\nsource: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask\">How do I ask a good question?</a></p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>If you ask a vague question, you\u2019ll get a vague answer. But if you\n  give us details and context, we can provide a useful answer.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p><strong>Make it relevant to others</strong><br>\nsource: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask\">How do I ask a good question?</a></p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>We like to help as many people at a time as we can. Make it clear how\n  your question is relevant to more people than just you, and more of us\n  will be interested in your question and willing to look into it.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<hr>\n\n<p>Regarding your example:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>would a question from an hobbyist about reverse engineering the circuit of a cheap, china-made, microcontroller board of unknown brand like those usually found on Amazon or eBay be on-topic here?</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>Yes, this question would be on-topic as long it is detailed enough and with specific questions.</p>\n\n<p>Here are similar good-questions that created a space for good answers:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/85/reversing-an-fpga-circuit\">Reversing an FPGA circuit</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2143/e-ink-display-interface-protocol\">E Ink display interface protocol</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/16296/knowledge-about-cpu-hardware\">Knowledge about CPU hardware</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1523/what-techniques-are-used-in-reverse-engineering-a-serial-protocol\">What techniques are used in reverse engineering a serial protocol?</a></li>\n</ul>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "361",
        "CreationDate": "2018-05-04T12:28:55.930",
        "Body": "<p>I noticed since a few weeks that the rate of visitors/day has dropped down in an irrealistic manner. It went from about 5000 visitors/day to 5.</p>\n\n<p>Did something change in the way it is counted or is it just a bug ? </p>\n",
        "Title": "Problem with visitors/day computation?",
        "Tags": "|support|bug|",
        "Answer": "<p>Area 51 still looks broken however the <a href=\"https://stackexchange.com/sites#traffic\">network overview page</a> seems to be working again (currently showing 4.5k/day).</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "369",
        "CreationDate": "2018-08-23T19:31:32.097",
        "Body": "<p>Right now we have a <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reverse-engineering\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;reverse-engineering&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">reverse-engineering</a> tag. I would like to raise the question of whether we should keep it or not, and suggest we remove it.</p>\n\n<p>If my answer gains enough upvotes and not too many downvotes/objections, I plan on removing the tag from all related questions and thus delete it. Other users are encouraged to argue against removing the tag or perhaps offer alternatives in additional answers.  </p>\n",
        "Title": "Should we keep the \"reverse-engineering\" tag?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|tags|",
        "Answer": "<p>Right now the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reverse-engineering\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;reverse-engineering&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">reverse-engineering</a> tag has <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/tags/reverse-engineering/info\">a dozen questions</a>, four of which by a single <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/users/25313/dandan\">user</a>, who's also relatively new to stack-exchange. Eleven out of the twelve questions were asked by a user of under 200 reputation points in RE.SE and only two other questions were opened by a single user with a reputation slightly above 100.</p>\n\n<p>This tag seems somewhat redundant, as <em>the entire site is about reverse-engineering</em> and I can think of only a handful of questions that won't fit under it.</p>\n\n<p>This tag also has neither usage guidance nor wiki content, and I find it hard to say those questions share any common ground (except, obviously, generally being about reverse engineering)</p>\n\n<p><em>Edit:</em></p>\n\n<p>So there's a <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/19089/how-to-learn-reverse-engineering-and-software-craking\">single closed question</a> I couldn't remove the reverse-engineering tag of (because that would lead to 0 tags) and there's no appropriate tag for it. I flagged it for deletion, hoping that'd let us get rid of the tag. I also edited the tag's wiki to point out it is redundant.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "373",
        "CreationDate": "2018-09-28T00:49:40.677",
        "Body": "<p>The <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> tag is a little odd, and without usage or wiki content its purpose is unclear at least to me, and I suspect to other users as well.</p>\n\n<p>Here is some analysis:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li>It currently has 11 questions in total.</li>\n<li>Three of those are for IDA plugins (although we already have <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro-plugins\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro-plugins&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro-plugins</a> for that, with over 100 questions).</li>\n<li>Five relate to ollydbg plugins. Usage and development, mostly.</li>\n<li>One each for:\n\n<ul>\n<li>installing x64dbg plugins</li>\n<li>reversing Lua</li>\n<li>working around mac code signing (to load a plugin).</li>\n</ul></li>\n</ul>\n\n<p>Edit:</p>\n\n<p>I already removed the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> from the following completely unrelated questions:</p>\n\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/19479/macos-disable-codesign-check-run-codesign-on-multiple-files\">(MacOS) disable codesign check / run codesign on multiple files</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/9022/reversing-luac-is-there-a-way-to-get-proper-variable-names\">Reversing Luac (is there a way to get proper variable names)</a></li>\n</ul>\n",
        "Title": "What's the purpose of the \"plugin\" tag?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|tags|",
        "Answer": "<p>Given the listing you gave it's clear that, while <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro-plugins\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro-plugins&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro-plugins</a> is a subset of <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> (oddly the former being plural here, while the latter is singular), the number of questions with the former tag completely outnumber the latter.</p>\n\n<p>I think, however, that <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> should be more aptly named <code>tool-plugin</code> [1] to denote that this is about a common extension mechanism in reverse engineering tools. However, this is probably a matter of taste and so I fully expect objections.</p>\n\n<p>The real problem starts now. It would make sense to keep the <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> to subsum any other questions about (RCE) tool plugins without substantial number of questions. Whenever a the tag for a particular tool reaches a certain popularity threshold, questions could be moved into a <code>${tool}-plugin</code> (e.g. for <code>ollydbg</code> -> <code>ollydbg-plugin</code>). But then you'd also have to define such a threshold.</p>\n\n<p>We have to weigh two things here.</p>\n\n<ol>\n<li>For starters only five tags can be applied to any given question. It's been very rare in all my years and across SE sites that I really struggled to make do with \"just\" five tags. Only on rare occasions would I have wished for one or two more. So, given the limitation, it would make sense to create tool-specific <code>${tool}-plugin</code> tags.</li>\n<li>Yet, on the other hand, the power of combination (or Unix philosophy) comes to mind. <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/ida\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;ida&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">ida</a> and <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> together also explain nicely what's going on. But you need one more tag than for the tool-specific tags.</li>\n</ol>\n\n<p>[1] ... or <code>rce-tool-plugin</code>, where RCE isn't implied merely by the fact that this is RE.SE, since we also allow non-code RE questions.</p>\n\n<hr>\n\n<h2>My stance on what should be done</h2>\n\n<ul>\n<li>The three questions tagged <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> that belong into <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro-plugins\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro-plugins&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro-plugins</a> should be moved to that latter tag.</li>\n<li>all other <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> questions should stay and be <em>combined</em> with the tag for the tool hosting that plugin.</li>\n<li>discuss about whether a tool-specific plugin tag should be created, once <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/plugin\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;plugin&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">plugin</a> questions for a tag reach a certain (unspecified at this point!) popularity -> then open topic here on RE.meta.SE</li>\n<li>discuss whether <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro-plugins\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro-plugins&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro-plugins</a> should be singular, if yes move existing name and create a tag alias</li>\n<li>discuss whether <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro-plugins\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro-plugins&#39;\" rel=\"tag\">idapro-plugins</a> should be called <code>ida-plugins</code>. The fact that editions lower than \"Pro\" don't allow for plugins (not officially anyway) implies that the \"Pro\" edition is meant. So no need to repeat that fact in the tag name. Tags should be concise. The tag wiki on the other hand could mention the above facts in the outline or its body.</li>\n</ul>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "378",
        "CreationDate": "2018-10-04T01:30:54.697",
        "Body": "<p>When I went to the vendor's firmware download page linked to in <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/19517/need-help-identifying-main-processor-for-roland-synthesizer?atw=1\">Need help identifying main processor for Roland synthesizer</a> I saw this in the EULA:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <ol start=\"3\">\n  <li>Restrictions: You may not make or distribute copies of the Roland Product, or electronically transfer the Roland Product from one\n  computer to another or over a network. <strong>You may not decompile, reverse\n  engineer, disassemble, or otherwise reduce the Roland Software to a\n  human-perceivable form</strong>. You may not modify, sell, rent, transfer,\n  resell for profit, distribute or create derivative works based upon\n  the Roland Product or any part thereof. You may not export or\n  reexport, directly or indirectly, the Roland Product into any country\n  prohibited by the United States Export Administration Act and the\n  regulations thereunder.</li>\n  </ol>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>I should note here that the EULA also states the following:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>This Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the United States of America and the State of California, without regard to its conflicts of law provisions.</p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>Since we must agree to the EULA in order to download the binary, and since the OP wants to reverse engineer said binary, what should be done? </p>\n\n<p>People typically do not read the EULA, so I would assume that in general they are unaware that what they are attempting to do is in violation of it.</p>\n\n<p>I did see <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/324/are-questions-that-involve-drm-reverse-engineering-allowed\">Are questions that involve DRM reverse engineering allowed?</a> but I am unsure of how relevant it is.</p>\n",
        "Title": "How should we handle posts in which reverse engineering is prohibited by a EULA?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|",
        "Answer": "<p>I'll stick with the recommendation given elsewhere and succinctly paraphrased there as (bracketed addition by me):</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p><strong>It is not our job [as moderators] to enforce third party agreements.</strong></p>\n</blockquote>\n\n<p>Anything else opens a can of worms. IANAL. So I am very happy to be given the opportunity to ignore this for once.</p>\n\n<p>For example it's legal within the EU to reverse-engineer a software system for interop purposes. So for example the work on ReactOS w.r.t. Windows or on LibreOffice w.r.t. MS Office is acceptable as long as it's <em>not</em> about something like copying those ghastly \"innovative\" ribbon bars. However, if Microsoft decided to go after either of those projects (ignoring the PR disaster waiting for them in such a case), we'd have to defer the actual arguing about the text of the law to the judges. So let us not pretend that laws are at all something clear-cut and leave the worry about DCMA take-down notices to the community managers rather than the moderators pro tempore or elected moderators. So being in the shoes of a moderator at the time of this writing I'll happily make use of the opportunity to ignore the question of legality in those gray area cases.</p>\n\n<p>And Igor has it right, I think:</p>\n\n<blockquote>\n  <p>If you'd rather not violate EULA just don't download the binary, you <em>don't have to</em> solve every poster's issues.</p>\n</blockquote>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "413",
        "CreationDate": "2021-12-03T10:20:15.550",
        "Body": "<p>since <a href=\"https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/49551/reverse-engineering\">the proposal in 2013</a>, our site has steadily garnered interest and and influx of new community members. Igor also pointed out, that we probably owe the whole idea taking shape to Rolf pitching it <a href=\"https://www.reddit.com/r/ReverseEngineering/comments/17tt6p/for_those_interested_in_the_reverse_engineering/\" rel=\"nofollow noreferrer\">over on Reddit</a>.</p>\n<p>As with so many topics, when you search for reverse engineering topics, often a Q&amp;A from our site will pop up in the search engine of your choice.</p>\n<p>Now, on December 16th (2021-12-16) our site will graduate and lose its beta label, similar to how it <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/331708/158489\">happened to other sites in 2019</a>.</p>\n<p><strong>Congratulations to the whole community.</strong></p>\n<p>NB: More information will be shared, but suffice it to say for now that this will also mean our first moderator elections for the site.</p>\n",
        "Title": "Upcoming site graduation: leaving beta on 2021-12-16",
        "Tags": "|discussion|events|community|",
        "Answer": "<p><a href=\"https://stackoverflow.blog/2021/12/16/congratulations-are-in-order-these-sites-are-leaving-beta/\">It's official</a>!</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "427",
        "CreationDate": "2022-12-28T11:51:27.353",
        "Body": "<p>As a newcomer to RE I recently asked a question about something that I was not understanding. I mentioned that I was using Ghidra and didn't understand why something wasn't working the way that I expected it to, although the answer to my question may or may not be more about understanding in general rather than a specific tool (I don't know because I don't know the answer and if I did know then I wouldn't be asking the question).</p>\n<p>I was quickly rudely shut down and told to ask in the Ghidra GitHub issues page.</p>\n<p>I then saw another Ghidra question being similarly shut down by the same person in the same way.</p>\n<p>Am I correct in thinking that this person is being rude and going on a rampage against newbies who use Ghidra, or are these questions genuinely inappropriate to post here?</p>\n<p>(Also, what happened to &quot;don't bite the newbies&quot;?)</p>\n",
        "Title": "Are questions relating specifically to Ghidra on-topic?",
        "Tags": "|support|",
        "Answer": "<p>Ghidra questions are on-topic. This includes questions about the tool itself. There is nothing wrong with also opening an issue at their GitHub repo, and if an answer is provided there please share it here as well.</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Am I correct in thinking that this person is being rude</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Yes, you are correct. If you see a post where it's clear someone is being rude, please flag it to bring it to our attention.</p>\n"
    },
    {
        "Id": "432",
        "CreationDate": "2023-01-30T16:21:40.467",
        "Body": "<p>I would like to once again put forward this <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/q/125\">old proposal</a>. Let's activate syntax highlighting for RE.SE.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/314554\">Currently it is not enabled.</a></p>\n<ul>\n<li>There are plenty of examples of Python code for helper scripts in answers, including Angr-related, IDAPython and Python-based GDB scripts</li>\n<li>There are pieces of various scripting languages, such as obfuscated and deobfuscated Javascript code</li>\n<li>Java would be useful for certain Ghidra-related Q&amp;As (but it also has some Python integration as well)</li>\n<li>There are several questions which attempt to correlate C/C++ source code to disassembly</li>\n<li>There are plenty of questions and answers with pseudo code that could probably be syntax highlighted as C/C++</li>\n<li>IDC, the original IDA scripting language is close enough to C/C++ to benefit from syntax highlighting</li>\n<li>Tags for some of the above (and below): <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapython\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapython&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapython&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-idapython-tooltip-container\">idapython</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/java\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;java&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;java&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-java-tooltip-container\">java</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/python\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;python&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;python&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-python-tooltip-container\">python</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/c%2b%2b\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;c++&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;c++&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-c++-tooltip-container\">c++</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/javascript\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;javascript&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;javascript&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-javascript-tooltip-container\">javascript</a>, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/c%23\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;c#&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;c#&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-c#-tooltip-container\">c#</a> and <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/hexrays\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;hexrays&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;hexrays&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-hexrays-tooltip-container\">hexrays</a> &amp; <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/decompilation\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;decompilation&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;decompilation&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-decompilation-tooltip-container\">decompilation</a> (for C/C++ pseudo code)</li>\n</ul>\n<h3>Concrete examples</h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Bash &amp; Python: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/a/25966\">this answer</a></li>\n<li>Python: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/1646\">this Q&amp;A</a>, related to IDAPython</li>\n<li>Bash: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/a/23385\">this answer</a></li>\n<li>C/C++: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/a/23396\">this answer</a></li>\n<li>Bash: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/a/6793\">this answer</a></li>\n<li>C/C++: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/a/9333\">this answer</a> (but also the question)</li>\n<li>C/C++: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/15798\">this question</a></li>\n<li>Python: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/a/3833\">this answer</a></li>\n<li>Python: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/19330\">this question</a></li>\n<li>Python: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/27491\">this question</a></li>\n<li>C/C++ &amp; Python: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/21077\">this Q&amp;A</a></li>\n<li>C/C++ pseudo code: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/29826\">this question</a></li>\n<li>C/C++ pseudo code: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/30544\">this question</a></li>\n<li>C/C++ with inline assembly: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/21361\">this question</a></li>\n<li>C/C++ pseudo code: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/27840\">this question</a></li>\n<li>Assembly: <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/q/30170\">this question</a></li>\n</ul>\n<hr />\n<p>For the record, <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/users/12112/jnat\">JNat</a> wrote in a comment <a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/q/431/245\">over here</a>, quote:</p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Have a discussion on Meta; once a consensus is reached, create a separate post for the actual request (pointing to the discussion and consensus) and [status-review] it as per <a href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/348642/208518\">this post</a>. A CM will then evaluate your request and discuss next steps depending on their assessment.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/q/436/245\">Update 2023-02-21: put in the request now</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/a/437/245\">Update 2023-03-02: it is now enabled</a></li>\n</ul>\n",
        "Title": "How about finally enabling syntax highlighting for RE.SE?",
        "Tags": "|discussion|feature-request|status-completed|syntax-highlighting|",
        "Answer": "<p>I enabled the following default languages for tags. This is mostly thought as a reference for now:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/c%2b%2b\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;c++&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;c++&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-c++-tooltip-container\">c++</a> -&gt; <code>lang-cpp</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/decompilation\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;decompilation&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;decompilation&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-decompilation-tooltip-container\">decompilation</a> -&gt; <code>lang-c</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/c\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;c&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;c&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-c-tooltip-container\">c</a> -&gt; <code>lang-c</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapython\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapython&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapython&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-idapython-tooltip-container\">idapython</a> -&gt; <code>lang-py</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/python\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;python&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;python&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-python-tooltip-container\">python</a> -&gt; <code>lang-py</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/java\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;java&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;java&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-java-tooltip-container\">java</a> -&gt; <code>lang-java</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/javascript\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;javascript&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;javascript&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-javascript-tooltip-container\">javascript</a> -&gt; <code>lang-js</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/c%23\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;c#&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;c#&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-c#-tooltip-container\">c#</a> -&gt; <code>lang-cs</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idapro-sdk\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro-sdk&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;idapro-sdk&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-idapro-sdk-tooltip-container\">idapro-sdk</a> -&gt; <code>lang-cpp</code> (debatable, but C++ is the better choice compared to C here)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/gcc\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;gcc&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;gcc&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-gcc-tooltip-container\">gcc</a> -&gt; <code>lang-cpp</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/struct\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;struct&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;struct&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-struct-tooltip-container\">struct</a> -&gt; <code>lang-c</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/angr\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;angr&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;angr&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-angr-tooltip-container\">angr</a> -&gt; <code>lang-py</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/delphi\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;delphi&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;delphi&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-delphi-tooltip-container\">delphi</a> -&gt; <code>lang-pascal</code> (no better match seems to exist)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lua\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;lua&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;lua&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-lua-tooltip-container\">lua</a> -&gt; <code>lang-lua</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/php\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;php&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;php&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-php-tooltip-container\">php</a> -&gt; <code>lang-php</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mfc\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;mfc&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;mfc&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-mfc-tooltip-container\">mfc</a> -&gt; <code>lang-cpp</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/idc\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;idc&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;idc&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-idc-tooltip-container\">idc</a> -&gt; <code>lang-cpp</code> (up for debate, we could also try <code>lang-c</code>, but this would also cover <code>auto</code>)</li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mssql\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;mssql&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;mssql&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-mssql-tooltip-container\">mssql</a> -&gt; <code>lang-sql</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/go\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;go&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;go&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-go-tooltip-container\">go</a> -&gt; <code>lang-golang</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/vba\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;vba&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;vba&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-vba-tooltip-container\">vba</a> -&gt; <code>lang-vb</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pykd\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;pykd&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;pykd&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-pykd-tooltip-container\">pykd</a> -&gt; <code>lang-py</code></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/erlang\" class=\"post-tag\" title=\"show questions tagged &#39;erlang&#39;\" aria-label=\"show questions tagged &#39;erlang&#39;\" rel=\"tag\" aria-labelledby=\"tag-erlang-tooltip-container\">erlang</a> -&gt; <code>lang-erlang</code></li>\n</ul>\n"
    }
]