answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 1
1.96k
| question
stringlengths 9
50
| id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"answer_start": [
151
],
"text": [
"47.08Ωcm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.086 | The Rct values of FeTa2O6/SC, CoTa2O6/SC, and CuTa10O26/SC were 6.21Ωcm2, 7.08Ωcm2, and 7.94Ωcm2, respectively, higher than the Rct values of FeTa2O6 (47.08Ωcm2), CoTa2O6 (88.21Ωcm2), and CuTa10O26 (98.16Ωcm2). | What is the value of Rct? | 9837 |
{
"answer_start": [
34
],
"text": [
"4.55cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.03.039 | The active area of the device was 4.55cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 2106 |
{
"answer_start": [
175
],
"text": [
"NiWO4"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.054 | The MWO4/BC used as CEs in DSSCs exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activity for I3− reduction and fast electron transport capability (Rct values of FeWO4/BC, CoWO4/BC, and NiWO4/BC were reduced from 12.00Ωcm2, 27.41Ωcm2, and 11.27Ωcm2 for FeWO4, CoWO4, and NiWO4 to 8.50Ωcm2, 8.07Ωcm2, and 2.17Ωcm2, respectively) owing to the synergistic effects of catalytic MWO4 and conductive BC. | What material has Rct of 11.27Ωcm2? | 34515 |
{
"answer_start": [
17
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.016 | DSSC based on BT-TiO2-RGO 30 s (bamboo-type TiO2 nanotubes modified with RGO via EPD time of 30 s) delivers the highest energy conversion efficiency (6.01%) with Voc of 0.77 V, Jsc of 12.51 mA cm−2 and FF of 0.62 (), which represents a 13.8% increase in cell efficiency compared to that of DSSC based on unmodified BT-TiO2 nanotube array (5.28%). | What material has Voc of 0.77 V? | 36048 |
{
"answer_start": [
59
],
"text": [
"60"
]
} | 10.1016/j.partic.2012.12.005 | (b) Fabrication of a porous TiO2 layer: the as-synthesized 60-nm TiO2 colloid paste was deposited onto the TiO2-coated glass substrates using a doctor-blade technique to form a 2 μm-thick porous TiO2 layer. | What is TiO2? | 22428 |
{
"answer_start": [
92
],
"text": [
"21.68mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.03.003 | Notably, there is a negligible hysteresis in our device, the best device exhibited a Jsc of 21.68mAcm−2, a Voc of 1V, a FF of 79%, and a PCE of 17.14%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 8355 |
{
"answer_start": [
146
],
"text": [
"39.72%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.017 | The device with the thickness of FPDI film of 75 nm shows a highest FF of 58.26%, better than that of the device with thinner FPDI film of 25 nm (39.72%). | What is the value of FF? | 6341 |
{
"answer_start": [
41
],
"text": [
"10.55%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.056 | At 3:2MA/FA, the device exhibited PCE of 10.55%. | What is the value of PCE? | 1969 |
{
"answer_start": [
26
],
"text": [
"Pt"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.023 | The referential DSSC with Pt CE was also measured under the same conditions, which yields η of 6.66% (Voc= 0.78 V, Jsc= 13.0 mA cm−2, FF = 65.9%). | What material has η of 6.66%? | 36814 |
{
"answer_start": [
22
],
"text": [
"6.12%"
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA01151J | The PCE increase from 6.12% to 10.03% was mainly due to the enhancement in the Voc and FF. | What is the value of PCE? | 14177 |
{
"answer_start": [
110
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/C0EE00083C | The ruthenium phthalocyanineTT-35 is a triplet injector whereas the zinc derivative typically inject into the TiO2 conduction band from its singlet excited state. | What is ? | 8258 |
{
"answer_start": [
293
],
"text": [
"0.903V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.305 | In the standard case using the MAPbI3-xClx perovskite cell, the photovoltaic parameters of Voc, the short-circuit current density, Jsc, fill factor, FF, power conversion efficiency, η, average power conversion efficiency, ηave, series resistance, Rs, shunt resistance, Rsh were obtained to be 0.903V, 13.5mAcm−2, 0.516, 6.30%, 5.79%, 10.1Ωcm2 and 239Ωcm2 as listed in . | What is the value of Voc? | 3956 |
{
"answer_start": [
52
],
"text": [
"3.36%"
]
} | 10.1039/C1CP21762C | A solar-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) of 3.36% is achieved for the cell with the double layer (DL) film, which is 16% higher than that of the cell with only transparent layer (TL) of commercial ZnO (2.89%) and far higher than that of the cell with SL (0.05%). | What is the value of η? | 29541 |
{
"answer_start": [
94
],
"text": [
"608 mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.03.028 | Under the same condition, the DTA sensitized solar cell gives a Jsc of 4.78 mA cm−2, a Voc of 608 mV, and an ff of 0.70, corresponding to η of 2.03%. | What is the value of Voc? | 11677 |
{
"answer_start": [
26
],
"text": [
"Pt"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.092 | For comparision, standard Pt CE produced a PCE of 6.38% (Jsc=17.67mAcm−2, Voc=690mV, FF=0.52). | What material has Voc of 690mV? | 34660 |
{
"answer_start": [
83
],
"text": [
"5.94%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TC00661E | Other cells with DA-2, DA-3 and DA-4 also exhibited good performances with an η of 5.94%, 6.05% and 5.88%, respectively (versus 7.91% for N719 under the same experimental conditions). | What is the value of η? | 4914 |
{
"answer_start": [
307
],
"text": [
"6.2%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.04.059 | The open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), fill-factor (FF) and PCE of DSSCs based on SnO2@SWCNTs@RGO are 0.70V, 14.0mAcm−2, 62.5%, and 6.1% respectively, the photovoltaic characteristic of DSSCs based on Pt CEs which are comparable; Voc=0.77V, Jsc=12.1mAcm−2, FF=68% and PCE=6.2%. | What is the value of PCE? | 8848 |
{
"answer_start": [
118
],
"text": [
"681 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA11398A | The resultant quasi-solid-state DSSCs based on FNE48 and FNE49 provided Jsc of 12.20 and 9.22 mA cm−2, Voc of 680 and 681 mV, and FF of 0.63 and 0.64, respectively, which correspond to η values of 5.2% and 4.0%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 30461 |
{
"answer_start": [
34
],
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.07.106 | The active area of photoanode was 0.16 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 17567 |
{
"answer_start": [
384
],
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.017 | Hence, the weight ratios of the above mixtures such as 5:0, 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, and 1:4 were denoted as TB-/a-TiO2 (5:0), TB-/a-TiO2 (4:1), TB-/a-TiO2 (3:2), TB-/a-TiO2 (2:3), and TB-/a-TiO2 (1:4), respectively.To assemble the DSSC, the a-TiO2 paste were screen printed on cleaned fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) conducting substrates to obtain a thickness of ∼14 μm with an active area of 0.16 cm2 followed by the annealing procedure. | What is the value of active area? | 2245 |
{
"answer_start": [
119
],
"text": [
"4.65 mA"
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.03.043 | By the optimized combination of dyes (80% red + 20% green) co-sensitized DSSC, the observed cell parameters were, Isc= 4.65 mA, Voc= 386.7mA and FF= 0.55. | What is the value of Isc? | 21619 |
{
"answer_start": [
92
],
"text": [
"1.01 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C6NR01043A | On comparison, device B with MAPbI2.7Br0.3 achieved the highest PCE of 13.49% with a VOC of 1.01 V, a JSC of 18.98 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.71. | What is the value of VOC? | 18416 |
{
"answer_start": [
136
],
"text": [
"8.17%"
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM30393K | When the CE of the DSSC has the Pt nanospindles, the photovoltaic parameters are, VOC = 0.78 V, JSC = 18.03 mA cm−2, FF = 0.58, and η = 8.17%. | What is the value of η? | 22622 |
{
"answer_start": [
266
],
"text": [
"FTO glass"
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.04.025 | The photovoltaic parameters obtained from the photocurrent density–voltage curves, including open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current density (Jsc), fill factor (FF), and conversion efficiency (η) are summarized in , it can be seen that the DSC with a bare FTO glass as a counter electrode has a Voc of 0.494 V, a Jsc of 4.11 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.1, leading to a very poor conversion efficiency of 0.22%. | What material has η of 0.22%? | 36791 |
{
"answer_start": [
152
],
"text": [
"400 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA17063F | The DSSC based on the monolayered ZnO photoanode (cell 1) shows lowest photovoltaic conversion efficiency (0.43%) with an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 400 mV, a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 2.11 mA cm−2 and a fill factor (FF) of 51.5%. | What is the value of Voc? | 3764 |
{
"answer_start": [
93
],
"text": [
"663 mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.ica.2012.03.047 | Under the same condition, the Y3 sensitized solar cell gave a Jsc of 11.86 mA cm−2, a Voc of 663 mV, and a fill factor of 0.70, corresponding to η of 5.48%, which is 75% of the N719-sensitized cell. | What is the value of Voc? | 23518 |
{
"answer_start": [
32
],
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA00769A | The PCE of the TDZDT-containing CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite-based solar cells is 19.04%, and the devices presented excellent humidity and thermal stability in 65 ± 5% relative humidity at room temperature under dark conditions, and in 30% relative humidity at 60–75 °C under dark conditions, respectively. | What is perovskite? | 17242 |
{
"answer_start": [
85
],
"text": [
"0.714 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.121 | The DSSC device containing pure TiO2 crystallites has a Jsc of 12.27 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.714 V, and η of 6.13%. | What is the value of Voc? | 1844 |
{
"answer_start": [
31
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.07.017 | Regarding the impedance of the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface, the gel-based electrolyte with 0.1 M LiTFSI attained the lowest impedance value, followed by the gel-based electrolyte with 0.1 M C10H16O4S, the liquid-based electrolyte, and the 1:1 gel-based electrolyte. | What is ? | 4308 |
{
"answer_start": [
178
],
"text": [
"814.06 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C4NJ02263G | Under standard global air mass 1.5 solar conditions, the WH-C1 sensitized cell gave a short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 11.87 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 814.06 mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.69, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 6.71%. | What is the value of Voc? | 30311 |
{
"answer_start": [
172
],
"text": [
"NGFs"
]
} | 10.1039/C6NR01838F | The DSSC devices made from the NGF CEs display a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 7.32%, which is comparable to that of Pt CEs (7.28%).3D nanomesh graphene frameworks (NGFs) were synthesised via the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) approach with CH4 as the carbon source in a vertical quartz fluidized-bed reactor. | What material has PCE of 7.32%? | 37308 |
{
"answer_start": [
129
],
"text": [
"1.8%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.10.026 | We have observed that the power conversion efficiencies (η) for compounds 7, 8, 10 and 11 sensitized TiO2 cells were 1.4%, 2.7%, 1.8% and 2.1%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 7700 |
{
"answer_start": [
334
],
"text": [
"1.03V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.089 | Interestingly, when the optimal thickness of ZnO (33.5nm-thick) was deposited on the optimal thickness PCBM layer and the PCBM/ZnO bilayer was formed, the device showed remarkably enhanced device performance compared to the PCBM based device, resulting in the optimal PCBM/ZnO bilayer-based device reaching a PCE of 15.63 with VOC of 1.03V, JSC of 18.69mAcm−2, and FF of 79.95%, and the highest PCE of 16.39% was achieved. | What is the value of VOC? | 12914 |
{
"answer_start": [
352
],
"text": [
"0.670 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.007 | Since the short-current density (Jsc) is mainly influenced by dye loading ability and electron-transfer efficiency in the TiO2 film already indicate that the recombination rate of the conduction band electrons in TiO2–NaOH film is higher than that of the TiO2–H2O film, the lower Voc of DSSCs made of TiO2–NaOH film compared to that of TiO2–H2O film (0.670 V vs. | What is the value of Voc? | 13817 |
{
"answer_start": [
76
],
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.216 | The prepared TiO2 coated GLC thin film substrate exhibits an active area of 0.25 cm2 and an average film thickness of ∼12-15 μm. | What is the value of active area? | 5895 |
{
"answer_start": [
89
],
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA14385F | In addition, the electrocatalytic activity of the conducting gel electrolytes toward the I−/I3− redox couple in the 3D framework of the gel electrolyte decreases the overpotential and enhances Voc. | What is redox couple? | 26502 |
{
"answer_start": [
93
],
"text": [
"Au"
]
} | 10.1039/C4EE00762J | This is not expected in sensitized solar cells, because the FTO/bl-TiO2/mp-TiO2:MAPbBr3/PTAA/Au device shows a higher Voc of 1.29 V than the potential difference (1.16 eV) between the CBM (−4.0 eV) of TiO2 and the HOMO level (−5.16 eV) of PTAA. | What is FTO? | 2823 |
{
"answer_start": [
140
],
"text": [
"53.62%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.005 | The best cell showed a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 16.988 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.747 V and fill factor (FF) of 53.62%. | What is the value of FF? | 28748 |
{
"answer_start": [
86
],
"text": [
"FTO"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.085 | Thus, the method presented is a facile way to prepare highly active area of Pt-NPs on FTO glass substrate for a CE showing high photovoltaic performance in DSCs.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is substrate? | 14874 |
{
"answer_start": [
134
],
"text": [
"17.15%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.105384 | By using PCBM as the additive, as (b), the JSC, VOC and FF are 22.67mA/cm2, 1.06V and 71% respectively, which contributes to a PCE of 17.15%. | What is the value of PCE? | 7902 |
{
"answer_start": [
402
],
"text": [
"4"
]
} | 10.1039/C6DT00146G | For both TRIR and TA the sample was mounted on a rapidly moving “XY raster” to prevent heating and photochemical decomposition.p-DSCs were made by depositing the precursor solution described above onto conducting glass substrates (Pilkington TEC15, sheet resistance 15 Ω per square) by the doctor-blade technique using Scotch tape as a spacer (0.2 cm2 active area), followed by sintering in an oven at 450 °C for 30 min. | What material has active area of 0.2 cm2? | 36552 |
{
"answer_start": [
175
],
"text": [
"13%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4EE01724B | The maximum η reported for DSMs is 8.2% through optimized front and back illumination, which is still significantly lower than that obtained in high efficiency single cells (∼13%). | What is the value of η? | 22786 |
{
"answer_start": [
17
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2012.05.052 | The dye-adsorbed TiO2 working electrode and a counter electrode were then assembled into a sealed DSSC cell with a sealant spacer between the two electrode plates. | What is ? | 31936 |
{
"answer_start": [
41
],
"text": [
"0.98V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.050 | For the cubic CsPbBr3 solar cell, Voc of 0.98V, Jsc of 7.14 Am cm−2 and fill factor of 0.719, was obtained, all displaying an increasing tendency, and enhanced PCE of 5.04% is obtained. | What is the value of Voc? | 10545 |
{
"answer_start": [
123
],
"text": [
"20.95"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.101 | Under standard AM1.5G illumination, the cell based on ITO/Ag grid/AZO hybrid electrode exhibits Jsc, Voc, and FF values of 20.95mAcm−2,1.00V, and 66.1%, respectively, corresponding to a PCE of 13.86%. | What is ? | 31205 |
{
"answer_start": [
48
],
"text": [
"6.07%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.025 | Pt CE gives a high photovoltic performance (PCE=6.07%). | What is the value of PCE? | 19711 |
{
"answer_start": [
272
],
"text": [
"20.0%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA06900F | When we applied them to the inverted structured FAPbI3−xBrx planar perovskite solar cells, the NDI-PM-based device exhibited 19.1% and 19.6% η under forward and reverse scan conditions (average η = 17.15 ± 1.22%), respectively, whereas the PCBM-based device had 19.5% and 20.0% η under forward and reverse scan conditions (average η = 17.67 ± 1.10%), respectively, as shown in Fig. | What is the value of η? | 26069 |
{
"answer_start": [
163
],
"text": [
"75.2%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.08.009 | Best performance was achieved with 50% MACl, which yielded a champion device exhibiting a PCE of 14.5% with improved Voc, Jsc, and FF being 0.89V, 21.6mAcm−2, and 75.2%, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 24663 |
{
"answer_start": [
21
],
"text": [
"LD14"
]
} | 10.1039/C2EE03308A | Also, the VOC of the LD14 (0.710 V) and LD16 (0.707 V) devices were noticeably higher than those of LD13 (0.676 V) and LD15 (0.669 V) cells. | What material has VOC of 0.710 V? | 35434 |
{
"answer_start": [
32
],
"text": [
"18.5"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.02.007 | The integrated JSC values were ~18.53mAcm-2 and ~18.70mAcm-2 for Al2O3-based and non- Al2O3-based devices, respectively, which were in close agreement with the measured JV data.Electron microscopy images of the perovskite layer deposited on pure SnO2 and the composite SnO2/PCBM ETMs are shown in a and b, respectively. | What is ? | 5430 |
{
"answer_start": [
176
],
"text": [
"14.36%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7CC09838C | When the thickness of the CdS ETL is optimized at about 45 nm, the inverted planar PSC achieves a PCE of 13.36%, which is comparable to that of the device based on a PCBM ETL (14.36%). | What is the value of PCE? | 9621 |
{
"answer_start": [
451
],
"text": [
"PtCoNi"
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | Aiming at reducing the cost of CEs and enhancing the performance of the DSSC devices, many alloy CEs have been researched, including Pt alloy CEs: Pt0.02Co, PtCo2, PtCo, PtCo0.50, PtNi0.50, PtNi0.75, Pt3Ni, PtNi, PtFe, Pt0.96Ni0.04, PtMo, PtMn0.05, PtCr0.05, PtPd1.25, PtRu3, PtRu, PtAu; free-Pt alloy CEs: CoNi0.25, CoNi, FeCo2, FeSe, FeNi, Co0.85Se, CoSe, Ni0.85Se, NiSe, MoSe, Cu0.50Se, Ru0.33Se, RuSe, Pd7Se4, NiPd; and ternary alloy CEs: PtCuNi, PtCoNi, PtPdNi, PtFeNi, etc. | What is CE? | 13508 |
{
"answer_start": [
194
],
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151723 | In the device characterization, the current density-voltage curves of the MAPbI3 photovoltaic cells were measured using a source-meter system (Keithley 2400) under one sun illumination (AM1.5G, 100mW/cm2). | What is the value of illumination? | 23568 |
{
"answer_start": [
139
],
"text": [
"70.9%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | As for the device performance, devices based on Li-TFSI- and TBP-doped HTM 44 yielded a JSC of 10.3 mA cm−2, a VOC of 0.99 V, and an FF of 70.9%, which contributed to a PCE of 7.3%. | What is the value of FF? | 371 |
{
"answer_start": [
48
],
"text": [
"0.42 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.06.038 | The active area of the dye-coated TiO2 film was 0.42 cm2.The as-prepared amorphous SP with a diameter of ~ 300 nm (), was converted to a highly porous and crystallized structure (c, the XRD patterns indicated that the amorphous phase of the SP was converted to the highly crystallized anatase phase. | What is the value of active area? | 32575 |
{
"answer_start": [
105
],
"text": [
"2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.10.018 | were employed as natural sensitizers in water-based DSSC, resulting in Isc and Voc values ranging from 0.249 to 0.520 V and 5 to 10.9 mA/cm2, respectively. | What material has Voc of 0.520 V? | 35117 |
{
"answer_start": [
87
],
"text": [
"580 mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.024 | This is to some extent consistent with the order of decreasing Voc: UY7 (590 mV) >UY5 (580 mV) >UY8 (487 mV) >UY6 (451 mV).b), the middle frequency peak is indicative of the charge-transfer process of injected electrons in TiO2. | What is the value of Voc? | 19613 |
{
"answer_start": [
249
],
"text": [
"1.4 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA12509K | Optimization of the device fabrication procedures, including tuning of the concentration of the NCs solution and regulating the thickness of the CsPbBr3 NCs layer, brought about the champion devices with PCEs reaching 5.5% and VOC values as high as 1.4 V, where reduced hysteresis was observed.In a separate report by Christodoulou et al., colloidal mixed halide CsPbBrxI3−x NCs have also been utilized as light absorbing materials in PV devices with moderate performance. | What is the value of VOC? | 23301 |
{
"answer_start": [
57
],
"text": [
"17.83%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.024 | It can be seen that the PCE is centered at around 17.5% (17.83% of the average PCE), with 5 cells showing PCE lower than 16.5% and 2 devices over 18%. | What is the value of PCE? | 24175 |
{
"answer_start": [
46
],
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
]
} | 10.1039/C8NJ00847G | The active area of the DSSC device was around 0.25 cm2.The synthesis of 3,6-bis(4-bromophenyl)-2,5-diethyl-2,5-dihydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4-dione molecules (a) was carried out according to a reported process.Compound a (0.5 g) and K2CO3 (0.25 g) were dispersed in dry dimethylformamide (15 ml) at 90 °C for 1 h under an argon atmosphere. | What is the value of active area? | 29528 |
{
"answer_start": [
20
],
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
]
} | 10.1039/C7NJ01735A | The active area was 0.16 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 6119 |
{
"answer_start": [
56
],
"text": [
"Pt"
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA02730F | (ii) Open-circuit potential: the Voc of AB (0.74 V) and Pt (0.71 V) CEs are much lower than that of CuO-NRs/AB (0.77 V) based CE DSSCs, using same working electrode and electrolyte. | What material has Voc of 0.71 V? | 36501 |
{
"answer_start": [
187
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.036 | A hybrid architecture photoanode was fabricated by introducing TNPs into the freestanding TNT membrane using high-frequency AC-EPD technique and then compared with bare TNT and different TiO2 treatment methods. | What is photoanode? | 11162 |
{
"answer_start": [
185
],
"text": [
"1.35%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA13188J | Compared with P2, P1 gives a favourable blend film morphology with PTB7 as the donor material for efficient exciton separation and charge transport, leading to a relatively high PCE of 1.35% under the illumination of AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm−2.The authors greatly appreciate the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology (2014CB643501, 2015CB655003 and 2014DFA52030), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91233116 and 51073057), the Ministry of Education (NCET-11-0159), and the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (S2012030006232). | What is the value of PCE? | 19003 |
{
"answer_start": [
85
],
"text": [
"4.09%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.113 | On the other hand, the 1.0 ml.h−1 synthesized TiO2 nanofiber based DSSC produces η = 4.09% (Jsc = 8.62 mAcm−2, Voc = 0.719 V, FF = 0.63). | What is the value of η? | 20516 |
{
"answer_start": [
96
],
"text": [
"1.00V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104099 | The pure MAPbI3 solar cells showed a decent PCE of 14.87% with an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.00V, a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 20.10mAcm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 74%. | What is the value of VOC? | 26589 |
{
"answer_start": [
143
],
"text": [
"0.5cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.015 | In addition, the reference Pt electrode was also prepared by coating the Pt paste (Dyesol, counter PT-1) on the FTO glass (active area of ∼0.5×0.5cm2) and subsequently heated at 500°C (2°C/min) for 2h to improve the adhesion of thin Pt layer on the FTO glass.The porous TiO2 NPs/FTO glass as a photoanode was prepared by a simple and conventional method. | What is the value of active area? | 16350 |
{
"answer_start": [
93
],
"text": [
"∼0.5cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.135 | The thickness of the electrocatalyst layer and active area of CE were controlled to ∼5μm and ∼0.5cm2, respectively. | What is the value of active area? | 25125 |
{
"answer_start": [
200
],
"text": [
"6.84%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.025 | Due to the unique structure characteristics; the DSSCs equipped with NiCo2O4 nanoflowers CE achieved excellent PCE of 8.48%, which is higher than that of NiCo2O4 nanosheets (3.57%), NiCo2O4 nanotods (6.84%) and Pt (8.11%) CEs. | What is the value of PCE? | 10379 |
{
"answer_start": [
86
],
"text": [
"3.79%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.088 | Improved performance of the DSSCs (Jsc = 8.0 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.732 V, FF = 65%, and η= 3.79%) is obtained compared with the P25 TiO2 nanocrystalline DSSCs (Jsc = 7.25 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.702 V, FF = 59%, η= 2.96%, and measured at 100 mW cm−2, AM 1.5 G). | What is the value of η? | 22793 |
{
"answer_start": [
60
],
"text": [
"5.03%"
]
} | 10.1039/C9TC01727E | The DSSC devices based on 2a and 2b displayed a high PCE of 5.03% and 6.21%, respectively, with respect to the reference N719-based dye (3.56%). | What is the value of PCE? | 6242 |
{
"answer_start": [
86
],
"text": [
"32.5%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE02469C | We estimate the PCE potential for the best performing both-side textured device to be 32.5% for a perovskite bandgap of 1.66 eV. | What is the value of PCE? | 16775 |
{
"answer_start": [
36
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM16131A | The longer electron lifetime in the TiO2 thin film of a DSSC has to do with the increased VOC of the cells. | What is ? | 713 |
{
"answer_start": [
39
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2013.12.005 | DSSC was fabricated by using S,N-doped TiO2 as the anode layer and an efficiency of 1.80% was achieved in visible region, which is 50% more when compared with that of pure TiO2. | What is ? | 28971 |
{
"answer_start": [
175
],
"text": [
"17.07%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA10510C | The organic-scaffold perovskite solar cells (OPSCs) achieved a highest PCE of 19.45%, outperforming those of standard reference PSCs based on c-TiO2/m-TiO2 (the highest PCE = 17.07%). | What is the value of PCE? | 588 |
{
"answer_start": [
175
],
"text": [
"4.3%"
]
} | 10.1039/C2EE22657J | 2 shows the short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc) characteristics; the Jsc, Voc and PCE (η) of device 1 are measured to be 8.79 mA cm−2, 0.726 V and 4.3%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 28490 |
{
"answer_start": [
103
],
"text": [
"16.06%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00377C | The 3D TiO2 nanoarray based PSCs exhibited higher PCEs of 12.27% for RTNR@RTB, 14.71% for RTNR@ATB and 16.06% for RTNR@Am-TB. | What is the value of PCE? | 2748 |
{
"answer_start": [
39
],
"text": [
"8.9%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.087 | The NiCo2S4 CE achieved a PCE of up to 8.9% for DSSCs, indicating a 8.5%, 15.6%, and 3.5% increase in the PCE value compared to the DSSC with CoS, NiS, and Pt CEs, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 27394 |
{
"answer_start": [
69
],
"text": [
"0.72 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA06490A | The DSSCs based on the Pt CE showed a Jsc of 16.79 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.72 V, a FF of 63.36%, and therefore, an overall η of 7.66%. | What is the value of Voc? | 29302 |
{
"answer_start": [
47
],
"text": [
"0.1589 cm2"
]
} | 10.1039/C0EE00788A | The cell active area was tested with a mask of 0.1589 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 3963 |
{
"answer_start": [
70
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA07541J | Therefore, CeOx is a promising alternative to the currently prevalent TiO2 ETL for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells, and the low-temperature processing, which is compatible with flexible substrates, provides new opportunities for making future PSCs.This work was supported by the National Basic Research 973 Program of China (2014CB845601), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (U1205111, 21390390, 51572231, and 51502252), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (No. | What is ETL? | 15095 |
{
"answer_start": [
48
],
"text": [
"0.8 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.002 | The active area of each photanodic film was 0.8×0.8 cm2.All the anodes were soaked in 0.5 mM N719 dye solution (the solvent is acetonitrile and tert-butanol mixture with their volume ratio of 1:1) for 24 h. | What is the value of active area? | 20108 |
{
"answer_start": [
100
],
"text": [
"70.51%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR01433F | The JSC and FF increase with the increased doping concentration of up to 15 mM to 19.18 mA cm−2 and 70.51%, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 16231 |
{
"answer_start": [
115
],
"text": [
"1.06 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA06727H | The cell with the 10% NRs exhibited the best performance with the highest JSC of 21.18 mA cm−2, the highest VOC of 1.06 V, and the largest FF of 0.675, resulting in 15.15% efficiency. | What is the value of VOC? | 27319 |
{
"answer_start": [
560
],
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TC05640G | The narrowed pore size in films post-treated with a 40 mM TiCl4 solution obstructs the diffusion of the cobalt-based redox mediator, leading to regeneration, which in turn reduces the overall power conversion efficiency of the device.Transient photocurrent and photovoltage decay measurements were performed to determine the cause of the decreased open circuit potential when decreasing the TiCl4 concentration used in the post-treatment step for the devices sensitized with Y123, as this observation is contrary to that observed previously in the case of the I−/I3− redox couple. | What is redox couple? | 24306 |
{
"answer_start": [
211
],
"text": [
"8.34%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA01861G | The co-sensitized (7-BC + N719) DSSC showed a high efficiency of 9.68% (VOC of 750 mV, JSC of 18.18 mA cm−2 and FF of 0.71), exhibiting an improvement of 16% compared to the devices sensitized with N719 (PCE of 8.34%) alone under identical conditions.Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), one of the most promising candidates for renewable energy, are under intense investigation because of their easy fabrication, low price and high energy conversion efficiency. | What is the value of PCE? | 22550 |
{
"answer_start": [
180
],
"text": [
"22.82mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.012 | Compared to the pure FAPbI3 and MAPbI3, the gradient-band gap CsxFAPbI3 thin film PSCs achieve a high photovoltaic performance with a PCE of 18.22%, a short current density Jsc of 22.82mAcm−2, an open-circuit voltage Voc of 1.06V with a fill factor of 75.1%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 12645 |
{
"answer_start": [
82
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.08.096 | The results have demonstrated that Ti electrode deposited on the rough surface of TiO2 layer by e-beam evaporation can replace conventional transparent electrode. | What is ? | 820 |
{
"answer_start": [
85
],
"text": [
"7.92%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.03.004 | The PCE of the former increased to 8.17%, whereas the PCE of the latter dropped from 7.92% to 7.51% after 4 weeks.Composites of carbon nanomaterials were investigated as the counter electrode of DSSCs as well. | What is the value of PCE? | 4705 |
{
"answer_start": [
164
],
"text": [
"0.72 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA05264A | 4, the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of the DSSCs with VAFWCNTs/graphene varied over a small range of 0.69–0.73 V, similar to the value of the Pt control group cells (0.72 V). | What is the value of Voc? | 10474 |
{
"answer_start": [
318
],
"text": [
"8.0%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR02433A | Moreover, PProDOT synthesized in the ionic liquids 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate (EMIFAP), 3,4-(2′,2′-dimethylpropylene)-dioxythiophene (Me2-PProDOT) and 3,4-(2′,2′-diethylpropylene)-dioxythiophene (Et2-PProDOT) were also investigated and achieved prominent PCEs of 8.7%, 8.74%, 8.0%, respectively, in the Co2+/Co3+ redox shuttle systems (Table 1).The oriented PANI nanowire prepared by in situ growth was interesting and has been investigated as a CE in Co-mediated DSSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 20889 |
{
"answer_start": [
36
],
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.133 | The active area of DSSCs was 5×5mm (0.25cm2). | What is the value of active area? | 197 |
{
"answer_start": [
186
],
"text": [
"729.2 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA07967A | In addition, the IPCE spectrum of AZ263 exhibited a significantly larger area than the others.The Voc values increased in the following order: AZ260 (709.0 mV) < AZ263 (719.2 mV) < AZ6 (729.2 mV) < AZ261 (739.4 mV) < AZ262 (749.4 mV). | What is the value of Voc? | 31814 |
{
"answer_start": [
219
],
"text": [
"0.46V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.11.017 | It can be seen that Zn-tri-PcNc-4-sensitized cell yields a 3.22% efficiency with Jsc=9.83mAcm−2, Voc=0.48V, and FF=0.68, whereas the Zn-tri-PcNc-5-sensitized solar cell shows a 1.30% efficiency with Jsc=4.47mAcm−2, Voc=0.46V, and FF=0.63. | What is the value of Voc? | 24684 |
{
"answer_start": [
82
],
"text": [
"7.2%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC04649A | Nonetheless, the PCE values of the respective devices were enhanced to 18.5% and 17.2% when a TiO2/ionic liquid double ETL was utilized. | What is the value of PCE? | 28052 |
{
"answer_start": [
29
],
"text": [
"18.54%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.036 | The device achieved a PCE of 18.54% with a high open circuit voltage 1.10V and potent stability for 30days in dark under dry condition.Indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass substrates (180nm) with a sheet resistance of 8Ω/sq were purchased from Huayulianhe Co., Ltd. | What is the value of PCE? | 9813 |
{
"answer_start": [
87
],
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
]
} | 10.1039/C3NJ00430A | This assures efficient regeneration of the oxidized dyes by electron transfer from the I3−/I− redox couple in the electrolyte. | What is redox couple? | 29475 |
{
"answer_start": [
91
],
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.016 | Afterwards, these dye-sensitized TiO2 nanotube arrays with an active area of approximately 0.25 cm2 were rinsed with acetonitrile in order to remove physisorbed N719 dye molecules. | What is the value of active area? | 33109 |
{
"answer_start": [
68
],
"text": [
"518 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA10320J | The open circuit voltages (Voc) have been found to be 576, 548, and 518 mV for DSSCs based on TiO2 nanopopcorns on the Ti foil grown at the VR(H2O2:HF:H2O) of 1:1:1000, 1:2.5:1000, and 2.5:1:1000, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 6452 |
{
"answer_start": [
83
],
"text": [
"12.8mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.098 | The DSSC based on PPy–DBS− exhibits the highest efficiency of 5.40%, with a Jsc of 12.8mAcm−2, Voc of 0.69V, and FF of 0.55. | What is the value of Jsc? | 26302 |