answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 1
1.96k
| question
stringlengths 9
50
| id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"answer_start": [
99
],
"text": [
"17.2%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA08503J | Among the three HTMs, XPP (31) with two para-position substituted pyridine delivered a high PCE of 17.2% in tBP-free planar CH3NH3PbI3-based PSCs and 19.5% in mixed-ion [HC(NH2)2]0.85[CH3NH3]0.15Pb[I0.85Br0.15]3− based planar PSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 21773 |
{
"answer_start": [
18
],
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.185 | An active area of 0.25cm2 was used to measure the cell performance.The morphology of the CuO/TiO2 nanocomposite was studied by field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (Model TE-SCAN-MIRA3) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Zeiss-EM10C-80KV with holey carbon coated Cu grid with 300 meshes). | What is the value of active area? | 1549 |
{
"answer_start": [
142
],
"text": [
"5.19%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.10.013 | With the 0.2 wt.% of Ag@TiO2 NCs in 0.8 wt.% R-TNT-C, the Jsc and PCE enhanced to 22.2% (from 9.54 to 11.66 mA cm− 2) and 20.6% (from 4.26 to 5.19%), respectively.The DSSC photostability measurements are performed after preparing from photoanodes of 0.8 wt.% RGO–TNTs incorporated with and without Ag@TiO2 NCs at an ambient conditions for 125 h with a time interval of 16 to 20 h. | What is the value of PCE? | 3174 |
{
"answer_start": [
31
],
"text": [
"29.9%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.02.003 | The FF decreases from 41.2% to 29.9% with an increase in the C60 layer thickness from 2.5 to 15 nm, which is related to the coverage of CH3NH3PbI3 on the C60/FTO/glass sample as shown in (b) presents the hysteresis behaviors in the J-V curves. | What is the value of FF? | 33361 |
{
"answer_start": [
31
],
"text": [
"5.83%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.03.002 | As listed in , an excellent η= 5.83% was achieved in presence of 36 wt% PEGDME (Jsc= 12.1 mA cm−2, Voc= 671 mV, ff= 0.718). | What is the value of η? | 3937 |
{
"answer_start": [
63
],
"text": [
"∼14"
]
} | 10.1039/C1DT10210A | For the dye-loading measurements, the TiO2 working electrodes (∼14 μm) were made as those for the solar cells described previously. | What is TiO2? | 23688 |
{
"answer_start": [
72
],
"text": [
"3.83%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA05349H | For PPL-2, the best device gave a PCE of 4.04% with an average value of 3.83%, which are slightly higher than those for PPL-1. | What is the value of PCE? | 17191 |
{
"answer_start": [
127
],
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2011.10.038 | The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) of the cells were recorded using a potentiostat/galvanostat (CHI, model 440) under 100mWcm−2 light intensity. | What is the value of light intensity? | 4633 |
{
"answer_start": [
139
],
"text": [
"Pt"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.040 | A power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.58% for the Co0.85Se CE-based solar cell was obtained, which is comparable to that of cells using Pt CEs (8.57%); 7.09% PCE was obtained for the Ni0.85Se-based CE. | What material has PCE of 8.57%? | 35647 |
{
"answer_start": [
101
],
"text": [
"Pt"
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA26995D | Furthermore, the conversion efficiency achieved 5.77%, which was slightly better than the commercial Pt CE (PCE = 5.40%). | What material has PCE of 5.40%? | 35463 |
{
"answer_start": [
110
],
"text": [
"9.03 mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.026 | The DSSC with the SiO2 nanorod (9wt%) had higher Jsc (12mAcm−2) and η (4.68%) than the cells without NFs (Jsc=9.03 mAcm−2, η=3.39%) and with fumed SiO2 NFs (Jsc=9.91mAcm−2, η=3.96%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 13523 |
{
"answer_start": [
154
],
"text": [
"74.4%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.003 | And after thickness was further increased to 15 µm, a champion PCE as high as 14.07% was achieved, with the Voc of 0.899 V, Jsc of 21.03 mA/cm2 and FF of 74.4% (d). | What is the value of FF? | 34198 |
{
"answer_start": [
151
],
"text": [
"430 mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.12.018 | The short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), open-circuit photovoltage (Voc), fill factor (FF) and overall conversion efficiency (η) are 1.53 mA/cm2, 430 mV, 0.73 and 0.48%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 16578 |
{
"answer_start": [
73
],
"text": [
"0.85 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C2RA20542D | For the optimized devices, the Voc of the devices increased from 0.77 to 0.85 V when the nanoparticle size was increased from 10 nm to 27 nm. | What is the value of Voc? | 10337 |
{
"answer_start": [
43
],
"text": [
"2.98%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.02.022 | After an initial huge jump in the PCE from 2.98% to 5.84% with an increase in the number of TiO2 nanoparticle layers from three (TP-3L) to nine (TP-9L), the PCE decreased slightly to 5.40% when the number of TiO2 nanoparticle layers increased to 12 (TP-12L). | What is the value of PCE? | 12144 |
{
"answer_start": [
69
],
"text": [
"0.378%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.10.150 | The power conversion efficiency (η) of natural yellow dye (100%) was 0.378% and for natural red dye(100%) was 0.134%. | What is the value of η? | 33903 |
{
"answer_start": [
74
],
"text": [
"8.46%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.113 | For comparison, the PCE of the DSSCs using MoS2/CNFs, Pt and CNFs CEs was 8.46%, 7.65%, and 6.59%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 30240 |
{
"answer_start": [
105
],
"text": [
"0.76V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.264 | And the FDSSC with the Ag@ZrO2/C-4 CE exhibits the highest η of 4.77%, with a JSC of 11.79mAcm−2, VOC of 0.76V, and FF of 53.23%. | What is the value of VOC? | 11310 |
{
"answer_start": [
325
],
"text": [
"8.26%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR02433A | The high-surface area of the PEDOT films with an open mesoporous structure leads to an increase in the catalytic activity.The PEDOT and other polymers are used for CEs films in DSSCs assembled with [Co(bpy–pz)2](PF6)2 and [Co(bpy–pz)2](PF6)3 redox shuttles, in which the PEDOT film obtained significant PCE values as high as 8.26%. | What is the value of PCE? | 8134 |
{
"answer_start": [
278
],
"text": [
"21.6mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.03.019 | The current density-voltage (J-V) curves of the best performance devices based on PEDOT:PSS doped with different ratios of ammonia were measured under simulated 100mWcm , the reference device with pristine PEDOT:PSS generates a PCE of 14.4%, along with a Voc of 0.88V, a Jsc of 21.6mA/cm2 and an FF of 75.8%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 25086 |
{
"answer_start": [
64
],
"text": [
"5.5%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA06896C | 80% which is reflected in the higher efficiency of (5) with η = 5.5%. | What is the value of η? | 7243 |
{
"answer_start": [
273
],
"text": [
"76.18%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103946 | The best device based on PEDOT:PSS showed the Voc of 1.03V, Jsc of 21.39mAcm−2, and FF of 74.03%, corresponding to a PCE of 16.31%, whereas the best device based on XY1 displayed a more impressive performance with the Voc, Jsc, FF, and PCE increased to 1.11V, 22.21mAcm−2, 76.18%, and 18.78%, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 31133 |
{
"answer_start": [
240
],
"text": [
"5.26%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135102 | Apparently, the key photovoltaic parameters of CsPbBrxI3-x NCs tailored all-inorganic CsPbBr3 PSCs are dramatically enhanced, CsPbI3 NCs tailored device achieves a champion PCE of 9.45% in particular, increased by 79.66% in comparison with 5.26% of NCs-free device and higher than that of CsPbBr3 PSCs reported in the literatures, as shown in ]. | What is the value of PCE? | 14810 |
{
"answer_start": [
117
],
"text": [
"8.44%"
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA10718D | Remarkably, the DSSC based on o-CoSe2 delivered the highest PCE (9.34%) compared to c-CoSe2 (8.91%), the Co3Se4 NTs (8.44%), Pt (8.15%) and the Co3Se4 NPs (7.48%) under the same conditions; the Jsc values of the o-CoSe2, c-CoSe2 and Co3Se4 NTs, Pt, and the Co3Se4 NPs were 17.35, 16.60, 16.10, 15.52 and 14.66 mA cm−2, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 5312 |
{
"answer_start": [
165
],
"text": [
"6.48%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.148 | Obviously, 6H-indolo[2,3-b]quinoxaline-based dyes JY01–03 all exhibited the ability for efficient solar-to-electricity conversion, the corresponding PCEs range from 6.48% to 7.62% and increase in the order of JY02<JY03<JY01. | What is the value of PCE? | 28516 |
{
"answer_start": [
273
],
"text": [
"3.11%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.05.060 | The benchmark dye N3 (cis-bis(isothiocyanato) bis(2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-dicarboxylato) ruthenium was tested under the same conditions for comparison.First observation was that [Ru]1 is the least effective photosensitizer of the series with Jsc=7.13mA.cm-2, Voc=577mV and PCE=3.11%. | What is the value of PCE? | 4470 |
{
"answer_start": [
163
],
"text": [
"6 h"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.08.022 | Also, the photo-to-current conversion efficiency was observed to be approximately increased by 73% when first step anodic oxidation time was increased from 0.5 to 6 h. | What is the value of time? | 30766 |
{
"answer_start": [
90
],
"text": [
"0.12%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | For 4b the best cell featured a VOC of 573 mV, JSC of 0.75 mA cm−2, FF of 0.28 and PCE of 0.12%. | What is the value of PCE? | 13755 |
{
"answer_start": [
48
],
"text": [
"4.54%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2016.03.007 | The device based on D3 gives the highest PCE of 4.54% due to the highest Voc of 710 mV, a moderate Jsc of 9.70 mA/cm2 and a moderate FF of 0.66. | What is the value of PCE? | 12388 |
{
"answer_start": [
53
],
"text": [
"15.15%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.04.014 | The P3HT-grafted rGO precursors resulted in a PCE of 15.15% (22.15mA/cm2, 72%, 0.95V), which was higher than efficiency (= 13.91%) recorded in CH3NH3PbI3+rGO-g-PTEt systems (20.63mA/cm2, 71%, 0.95V), thanks to more intensified crystalline peaks, higher absorbance, larger grain sizes (averaged in 570nm and peaked in 750nm) and lower charge-transfer resistance (93.2 versus 109.4Ω). | What is the value of PCE? | 5887 |
{
"answer_start": [
33
],
"text": [
"732 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA09244A | The Voc is also about 746 mV and 732 mV for the cells with 2TB-1Sa and 2TB-1Sb photoanodes. | What is the value of Voc? | 34060 |
{
"answer_start": [
175
],
"text": [
"6.72%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.030 | The prepared cell displayed open voltage VOC of 0.66 V, short circuit current density JSC of 17.10 mA cm−2, fill factor (FF) of 0.59 and conversion material efficiency (η) of 6.72% respectively. | What is the value of η? | 13574 |
{
"answer_start": [
54
],
"text": [
"153 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C7CP01558E | All four POMs increased VOC significantly (by 65%, to 153 mV for 4), relative to CAD3 only, but accompanying falls in JSC (43 to 67%) left overall η similar (0.072–0.127%) to the NiO-CAD3 baseline (0.123%) (J–V curves Fig. | What is the value of VOC? | 26465 |
{
"answer_start": [
162
],
"text": [
"7.37%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA05522A | PANI-CND films were successfully utilized as CEs for DSSCs, exhibiting a higher conversion efficiency (η = 7.45%) than those of both the conventional Pt CEs (η = 7.37%) and the CEs made with pristine PANI (η = 5.60%). | What is the value of η? | 12162 |
{
"answer_start": [
124
],
"text": [
"2.15%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7NJ01184A | As shown in Table 2, the ZnTTTD dye exhibited the highest η of 3.51%, whereas the ZnTTEP and ZnTEP dyes showed a lower η of 2.15% and 1.14%, respectively.To explain this difference, the corresponding detailed photovoltaic performance parameters will be discussed. | What is the value of η? | 10587 |
{
"answer_start": [
161
],
"text": [
"12.47%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.036 | The average visible transmittance (AVT) of MAPbI3-xClx-NiO NPs composite film was ranged from 18% to 56% and the corresponding device PCE changed from 17.51% to 12.47%. | What is the value of PCE? | 28795 |
{
"answer_start": [
410
],
"text": [
"812 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA06679K | Based on the relationship of photovoltaic performance with film thickness, the best film thickness was also determined in the range of 13.9 to 16.5 μm for a high PCE.According to the above results, we fabricated another batch of TiO2 films in the thickness range of 13.9 to 16.5 μm for the purpose of achieving higher efficiency, and the best cell at 15.6 μm achieved a PCE of 9.80% with 15.67 mA cm−2 of Jsc, 812 mV of Voc, and 0.77 of FF (Fig. | What is the value of Voc? | 20311 |
{
"answer_start": [
166
],
"text": [
"120 s"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA08262E | It is clearly shown that the PbI2 peak dramatically decreases with the MAI loading time within the first 30 s, and it gradually decreases with the loading time up to 120 s. | What is the value of time? | 17624 |
{
"answer_start": [
175
],
"text": [
"625 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C2RA01326F | Under standard global AM 1.5 solar conditions, the WD-1 sensitized solar cell gave a short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 9.2 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 625 mV, a fill factor (ff) of 0.79, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency η of 4.54%. | What is the value of Voc? | 30764 |
{
"answer_start": [
432
],
"text": [
"9.03%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.153 | The dark current densities of DSSCs based on various compact layers are all lower than those of DSSC without compact layer, indicating the compact layer plays an important role in reducing the recombination rate of electron Considering the effect of UV irradiation on DSSCs, we used an UV filter (ZWB3) to remove the main absorbed light of N719 (, with the introduction of SYEu/SYEr, Jsc increased by 38.33% and PCE is enhanced by 49.03% than those of DSSC without the compact layer, which are attributed to the functional bilayer suppressing the recombination of electrons and blocking the back flow of electrons from FTO substrate to electrolyte, as well as the multifunctional layer can transform UV light into visible light d) confirm UC function. | What is the value of PCE? | 3019 |
{
"answer_start": [
29
],
"text": [
"4.81%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.055 | The devices show high PCE of 4.81%, and more excellent stability compared with that using referenced organic electrolyte. | What is the value of PCE? | 8200 |
{
"answer_start": [
56
],
"text": [
"8.91%"
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR00718C | Compared with Pt CE (7.67%), ICA also shows higher PCE (8.91%), open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current density (Jsc), and fill factor (FF) (Table 1 and Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 11888 |
{
"answer_start": [
195
],
"text": [
"2.62"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09661H | For instance, the flexible PSCs based on a ZnO compact layer formed by electrodeposition and ZnO nanorods grown by chemical bath deposition at low temperatures (<100 °C) yielded a highest PCE of 2.62% (Table 1). | What is ? | 1308 |
{
"answer_start": [
150
],
"text": [
"67.2%"
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA07507F | The device without any HTM demonstrates a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 16.1 mA cm−2, an open circuit (Voc) of 0.93 V, a fill factor (FF) of 67.2%, and results in an overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 10.1%, which is consistent with previous reports. | What is the value of FF? | 24339 |
{
"answer_start": [
174
],
"text": [
"13.01%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA08203K | The optimized planar-structured PVSC with the inverted structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/(PEA)2(CH3NH3)4Pb5I16/PC61BM/BCP/Ag presents a high fill factor of 0.77 and the best PCE of 13.01%. | What is the value of PCE? | 22386 |
{
"answer_start": [
180
],
"text": [
"15.44mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.095 | Note that the cell with the Co0.85Se/RGO hybrid exhibits a remarkable PCE of 7.81% (Jsc=16.01mAcm−2, Voc=0.706V, FF=0.69), which is even higher than those of Pt CE (PCE=7.55%, Jsc=15.44mAcm−2, Voc=0.707V, FF=0.69). | What is the value of Jsc? | 10091 |
{
"answer_start": [
125
],
"text": [
"61.2%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.008 | Devices employing PDPP3T as HTL showed a high PCE of 12.3%, with a very high Jsc of 20.5 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.98 V and a FF of 61.2%. | What is the value of FF? | 6313 |
{
"answer_start": [
217
],
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.110672 | The photocurrent-voltage signal (J–V curve) measurements were performed in a Sciencetech (SS 1.6K, AAA) solar simulator attached with Keithley Instrument source meter (Model No.: 2400) under the light illumination of 100mWcm−2 with the optical filter of AM 1.5G (USA) and electrochemical properties of the fabricated DSSCs were studied using Bio-Logic SP-150 Instrument.The UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded to study the optical absorption properties of TiO2 with different mol. | What is the value of illumination? | 32696 |
{
"answer_start": [
25
],
"text": [
"Mo2C"
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.068 | The PCE of DSSCs with Bi/Mo2C/MC CEs reached 8.06%, which was much higher than those of DSSCs with Mo2C/MC (7.29%) and MC (6.52%) CEs, and increased by 13.8% versus Pt CE (7.08%). | What is CEs? | 31543 |
{
"answer_start": [
14
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.04.013 | The shifts of TiO2 conduction band, which we associate with changes in the adsorbed quantity of tBP and BI, also caused changes in the electron injection efficiency affecting additionally the spatial variation of JSC.Whilst the differences in VOC were largely reduced with the electrolyte pumping treatment, the overall performance did not become homogenous because spatial variation in JSC was increased by the treatment. | What is ? | 9241 |
{
"answer_start": [
277
],
"text": [
"1000Wm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.05.021 | Current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics were recorded by a Keithley 2400 source/meter, and simulated AM 1.5G sunlight was provided by a Newport solar simulator (model 91160), which was calibrated using a certified reference solar cell (Fraunhofer ISE) to an intensity of 1000Wm−2. | What is the value of solar? | 18894 |
{
"answer_start": [
102
],
"text": [
"66.1%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA02312A | The DSSC containing pure TiO2 nanocrystallites has a Jsc of 12.80 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.715 V, an FF of 66.1%, and a η of 7.06%. | What is the value of FF? | 33567 |
{
"answer_start": [
29
],
"text": [
"7.18%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.10.016 | Compared to the iodine cell (7.18%), the corresponding cobalt cell exhibits a slightly decreased PCE (7.06%) primarily due to the remarkably decreased JSC. | What is the value of PCE? | 1714 |
{
"answer_start": [
122
],
"text": [
"12.0%"
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR02065K | We also observed that the open-circuit voltage increases from 1010 mV to 1045 mV and also the PCE increases from 10.8% to 12.0% when pure ZnO films were doped with aluminum (Al). | What is the value of PCE? | 8190 |
{
"answer_start": [
21
],
"text": [
"6.97%"
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA13217J | The PCE increases to 6.97%, when the oMWCNTs are ultrasonicated for 20 min. | What is the value of PCE? | 28926 |
{
"answer_start": [
67
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/B908542D | Using the –OH form for 1a or –COOH group for 2 and 3 to coordinate TiO2, moderate conversion efficiency has been achieved. | What is ? | 17189 |
{
"answer_start": [
206
],
"text": [
"2.81%"
]
} | 10.1039/C3CP51941D | When the sintering temperature increased from room temperature to 500 °C, the values of VOC, JSC, and η increased initially and then decreased slightly, with the optimal values of 0.68 V, 9.53 mA cm−2, and 2.81% after 450 °C calcination. | What is the value of η? | 4635 |
{
"answer_start": [
0
],
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
]
} | 10.1039/C6EE01555G | 4b shows well-defined layers and a TCA of ≈3 μm | What is perovskite? | 38287 |
{
"answer_start": [
100
],
"text": [
"TiO2"
]
} | 10.1039/C2RA01030E | Continuing studies aim to develop further improvements by increasing the length and surface area of TiO2, utilizing lower cost core materials, using dyes with broader spectral coverage and utilizing alternate redox couples.This work was supported by the Louisiana Board of Regents, LEQSF (2007-12)-ENH-PKSFI-PRS-04, LEQSF(2011)-PFUND-269, and LEQSF (2008-13)-GF-19. | What is ? | 17769 |
{
"answer_start": [
138
],
"text": [
"0.90 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA11739E | The control device based on the 300 nm pristine mixed halide perovskite film showed an average PCE of 9.47% with Voc, Jsc and FF equal to 0.90 V, 18.21 mA cm−2 and 0.572, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 19316 |
{
"answer_start": [
105
],
"text": [
"1.13 V"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA03953D | The device presents a promising PCE of 20.31% measured in the forward scan direction, including a Voc of 1.13 V, a Jsc of 23.72 mA cm−2, and a FF of 75%. | What is the value of Voc? | 20883 |
{
"answer_start": [
262
],
"text": [
"102 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM35101C | In comparison to the NiO nanoparticle based DSSC, prepared and tested under similar experimental conditions, Jsc of the best CuCrO2 based DSSC is as much as 18.9% lower than that of the NiO counterpart (0.491 mA cm−2versus 0.584 mA cm−2, Table 1), however, Voc (102 mV versus 90 mV) and FF (0.398 versus 0.318) of the CuCrO2 based DSSCs are 13.8% and 25% higher. | What is the value of Voc? | 11818 |
{
"answer_start": [
62
],
"text": [
"1.01 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.025 | The best cell showed the high PCE of 15.06% along with Voc of 1.01 V, FF of 0.67, and remarkably high Jsc of 22.13 mA cm−2. | What is the value of Voc? | 17073 |
{
"answer_start": [
124
],
"text": [
"9.843mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152797 | The DSSCs based on K2FeCu3Se4 CE achieves an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.715V, a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 9.843mA/cm2, a fill factor (FF) of 0.568, and a PCE of 5.07% which is more outstanding than that of K2FeCu3S4 CE (3.42%) and comparable with that of Pt CE (6.25%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 24988 |
{
"answer_start": [
238
],
"text": [
"662 mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.019 | The DSSC with Ti:Nb(5:5)–TiO2/FTO exhibited a higher PCE of 10.37% [Jsc= 20.82 mA/cm2, Voc= 717 mV, and a fill factor (FF) = 69.5%] than the reference device with Ti:Nb(10:0)–TiO2/FTO, which showed a PCE of 7.90% (Jsc= 18.05 mA/cm2, Voc= 662 mV, and FF= 66.1%). | What is the value of Voc? | 162 |
{
"answer_start": [
370
],
"text": [
"73%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.090 | An easy strategy to circumvent this issue is to increase the number of catalytic sites, for example, by increasing the thickness of the CEs [b, DSSCs with 5μm thick CNTf-CEs showed enhanced FF (60%), Jsc (17.7mA/cm2), and Voc (0.75V), values that led to an overall efficiency of 8%, which is identical to that of DSSCs with PtCEs (Jsc of 14.5mA/cm2; Voc of 0.75V; FF of 73%; η of 8%). | What is the value of FF? | 30114 |
{
"answer_start": [
150
],
"text": [
"5.34 mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.04.030 | The solar energy conversion efficiency (η) attained by titania films calcined at 450 °C was approximately 2.65% with a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 5.34 mA/cm2, an open-circuit potential (Voc) of 732 mV and a filling factor (FF) of 0.65 () are the relatively high values of Voc, implying that significant recombination reactions of conduction band electrons with I3- ions are realized only at relatively high values of applied potential. | What is the value of Jsc? | 32664 |
{
"answer_start": [
195
],
"text": [
"0.69 V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.197 | By comparing the photovoltaic parameters of the TiO2 NWAs and TiO2 HNWAs photoanodes, the Jsc value showed an upwards trend from 8.12 to 9.50 mA cm–2, whereas Voc decreased slightly from 0.72 to 0.69 V, resulting in overall photo to electric conversion efficiency from 3.31 to 3.85%.Generally, the power conversion efficiency of DSSC is mainly determined by the short-circuit current (Jsc), the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and the fill factor (FF) (formula Considering the sensitizer dye (N719) and conducting substrate (Ti mesh) used in our experiments are the same, the adsorbed dye with large amounts and the generated electrons with faster transmission rate and lower recombination rate are essential for obtaining high values of Jsc. | What is the value of Voc? | 18908 |
{
"answer_start": [
152
],
"text": [
"0.539V"
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107840 | CSD-09 exhibited better photovoltaic performance than CSD-08 because of stronger donating ability of bis-butoxyphenyl than dimethyl: Voc from 0.513V to 0.539V, Jsc from 11.01mA/cm2 to 11.30mA/cm2 and power-conversion-efficiency (η) from 3.43% to 3.62%. | What is the value of Voc? | 16164 |
{
"answer_start": [
211
],
"text": [
"5.45%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.142 | Optimization on both the wt% of MSNs and the I2 concentration (i.e., 10wt% of MSNs and 0.02M of I2) of the gel-electrolyte give the best cell performance with a light-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) of 5.45% under illumination of 100mWcm−2. | What is the value of η? | 29494 |
{
"answer_start": [
40
],
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151817 | The PCEs with the structure of FTO/SnO2/CH3NH3PbI3/Carbon were fabricated at a low temperature and the thickness of the SnO2 ETL was optimized by adjusting the concentration of the SnO2 precursor. | What is FTO? | 13842 |
{
"answer_start": [
189
],
"text": [
"5.01%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.05.074 | Under standard global AM 1.5 solar conditions, the HKK-Por1 sensitiser cell gave a JSC of 10.7 mAcm−2, VOC of 0.67 V, and FF of 0.70, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency η of 5.01%. | What is the value of η? | 21921 |
{
"answer_start": [
82
],
"text": [
"12.19mAcm−2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.117 | From 0 to 96h, the Jsc and conversion efficiency of DSSC increases slightly (from 12.19mAcm−2 to 13.53mAcm−2 and 5.74 % to 6.13 %, respectively), we attribute it to the slow stabilization of electrolyte additives on PPy CE In summary, a novel transparent PPy CE has been prepared by in situ polymerization of pyrrole on FTO glass. | What is the value of Jsc? | 7277 |
{
"answer_start": [
83
],
"text": [
"843 mV"
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE03309H | Moreover, dye C288 exhibits the highest JSC of 19.65 mA cm−2, the identical VOC of 843 mV to that of C286, yielding an impressive PCE of 12.0%, albeit the smallest FF of 72.5%. | What is the value of VOC? | 21890 |
{
"answer_start": [
97
],
"text": [
"Pt"
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM30832K | The open circuit voltage (Voc) values of the two DSCs were 0.76 and 0.77 V, close to that of the Pt-DSC (0.78 V). | What material has Voc of 0.78 V? | 35952 |
{
"answer_start": [
111
],
"text": [
"71.0%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.004 | The values are comparable to DSCs made with the Pt CE, which showed JSC of 12.3 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.818 V, FF of 71.0%, and η of 7.1%. | What is the value of FF? | 8129 |
{
"answer_start": [
88
],
"text": [
"925mV"
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.121 | Furthermore, a notably improved JSC of 15.01mAcm−2 concomitant with an increased VOC of 925mV was achieved with the M36 dye, contributing to a higher PCE of 9.58%. | What is the value of VOC? | 19117 |
{
"answer_start": [
150
],
"text": [
"20.10%"
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA08819E | Our results demonstrate that by using non-fullerene materials with cyano groups, inverted planar-structured PVSCs show significant PCE improvement to 20.10%, which is among the highest values of low-temperature processed solar cells. | What is the value of PCE? | 27040 |
{
"answer_start": [
36
],
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2010.02.011 | Ltd., USA) under an illumination of 100 mW/cm2 (globe AM1.5, 1 sun) from a 300 W Xenon lamp (Oriel) at room temperature. | What is the value of illumination? | 30585 |
{
"answer_start": [
63
],
"text": [
"16.34 mA/cm2"
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.08.024 | The device with a PEDOT:PSS HTL has a JSC, VOC, FF, and PCE of 16.34 mA/cm2, 0.92 V, 0.60, and 9.02%, respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 20126 |
{
"answer_start": [
140
],
"text": [
"3.07%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.028 | More importantly, under rear-side illumination the PCE of bifacial DSSCs with N-doped, S-doped and N/S dual-doped GFs as CEs can also reach 3.07%, 3.19% and 3.45%, suggesting that the doped GFs have great potential applications in fabricating bifacial DSSCs with high performance.Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have been widely investigated as one of the most promising third generation solar cells since the pioneering work reported in 1991, due to their ease of fabrication, low cost, high flexibility, environmental friendliness, etc To overcome the disadvantages of Pt, carbon-based materials with their core features like cost-effectiveness, availability and corrosion resistance have been intensively explored in hope of finding promising substitutes of Pt in DSSCs In our work, N-doped, S-doped and N/S dual-doped transparent GFs were prepared by a CVD method and employed as CEs for bifacial DSSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 23167 |
{
"answer_start": [
185
],
"text": [
"8"
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.06.057 | The DSSC without PVP and UV irradiation obtains JSC of 3.35 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.723 V, FF of 0.674, and η of 1.61%; while the DSSC with PVP and UV achieves JSC of 5.44 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.787 V, FF of 0.706, and η of 3.02%, respectively. | What material has VOC of 0.787 V? | 34965 |
{
"answer_start": [
0
],
"text": [
"5.79%"
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.12.033 | 5.79% of solar energy to electricity conversion efficiency (η) based on XS21 was achieved with a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 10.0 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 782 mV, and a fill factor (ff) of 0.74. | What is the value of η? | 29837 |