|
{ |
|
"paper_id": "2021", |
|
"header": { |
|
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0", |
|
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T01:13:09.114902Z" |
|
}, |
|
"title": "Morphological Segmentation for Seneca", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Zoey", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Liu", |
|
"suffix": "", |
|
"affiliation": { |
|
"laboratory": "", |
|
"institution": "Boston College", |
|
"location": {} |
|
}, |
|
"email": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Robbie", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Jimerson", |
|
"suffix": "", |
|
"affiliation": {}, |
|
"email": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Emily", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Prud'hommeaux", |
|
"suffix": "", |
|
"affiliation": { |
|
"laboratory": "", |
|
"institution": "Boston College", |
|
"location": {} |
|
}, |
|
"email": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": "", |
|
"venue": null, |
|
"identifiers": {}, |
|
"abstract": "This study takes up the task of low-resource morphological segmentation for Seneca, a critically endangered and morphologically complex Native American language primarily spoken in what is now New York State and Ontario. The labeled data in our experiments comes from two sources: one digitized from a publicly available grammar book and the other collected from informal sources. We treat these two sources as distinct domains and investigate different evaluation designs for model selection. The first design abides by standard practices and evaluates models with the in-domain development set, while the second one carries out evaluation using a development domain, or the out-of-domain development set. Across a series of monolingual and cross-linguistic training settings, our results demonstrate the utility of neural encoderdecoder architecture when coupled with multitask learning.", |
|
"pdf_parse": { |
|
"paper_id": "2021", |
|
"_pdf_hash": "", |
|
"abstract": [ |
|
{ |
|
"text": "This study takes up the task of low-resource morphological segmentation for Seneca, a critically endangered and morphologically complex Native American language primarily spoken in what is now New York State and Ontario. The labeled data in our experiments comes from two sources: one digitized from a publicly available grammar book and the other collected from informal sources. We treat these two sources as distinct domains and investigate different evaluation designs for model selection. The first design abides by standard practices and evaluates models with the in-domain development set, while the second one carries out evaluation using a development domain, or the out-of-domain development set. Across a series of monolingual and cross-linguistic training settings, our results demonstrate the utility of neural encoderdecoder architecture when coupled with multitask learning.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Abstract", |
|
"sec_num": null |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"body_text": [ |
|
{ |
|
"text": "A member of the Hodin\u00f6h\u0161\u00f6ni (Iroquoian) language family in North America, the Seneca language is spoken mainly in three reservations located in Western New York: Allegany, Cattaraugus and Tonawanda. Seneca is considered acutely endangered and is currently estimated to have fewer than 50 first-language speakers left, most of whom are elders. Motivated by the Seneca community's language reclamation and revitalization program, a few hundred children and adults are actively learning and speaking Seneca as a second language.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Introduction", |
|
"sec_num": "1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "To further facilitate the documentation process of Seneca, recent years have witnessed the scholarly bridge between the language community and academic research, taking advantage of rapidly evolving technologies in natural language processing (NLP) (Neubig et al., 2020; Jimerson and Prud'hommeaux, 2018) . In particular, ongoing work has mainly been devoted to developing automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems for Seneca (Thai et al., 2020 (Thai et al., , 2019 . Their findings demonstrated that when combined with synthetic data augmentation and machine learning techniques, robust acoustic models could be built even with a very limited amount of recorded naturalistic speech. More importantly, the research output was incorporated into the Seneca people's documentation endeavors, illustrating the potential of collaborations between language communities and academic researchers.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 249, |
|
"end": 270, |
|
"text": "(Neubig et al., 2020;", |
|
"ref_id": null |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 271, |
|
"end": 304, |
|
"text": "Jimerson and Prud'hommeaux, 2018)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF32" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 427, |
|
"end": 445, |
|
"text": "(Thai et al., 2020", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF62" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 446, |
|
"end": 466, |
|
"text": "(Thai et al., , 2019", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF61" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Introduction", |
|
"sec_num": "1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "The current study contributes to this line of research with the same ethical considerations (Meek, 2012) . Specifically, we focus on morphological segmentation for Seneca, an area that has not yet been investigated thus far. Given a Seneca word, the task of morphological segmentation is to decompose it into individual morphemes (e.g., hasgatgw\u00eb's \u2192 ha + sgatgw\u00eb' + s).", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 92, |
|
"end": 104, |
|
"text": "(Meek, 2012)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF44" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Introduction", |
|
"sec_num": "1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "With a series of in-domain, cross-domain and cross-linguistic experiments, the goal of our work is to build effective segmentation models that can support the community's ongoing language reclamation and revitalization efforts. Particularly for morphologically rich languages, it has been shown that morphological segmentation is a useful component in certain NLP tasks such as machine translation (Clifton and Sarkar, 2011) , dependency parsing (Seeker and \u00c7etinoglu, 2015) , keyword spotting (Narasimhan et al., 2014) , and automatic speech recognition (ASR) (Afify et al., 2006) . Given that Seneca is a highly polysynthetic language (see Section 2), good morphological segmentation models show promise for the development of other computational systems such as ASR, which would facilitate the documentation process of the language itself.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 398, |
|
"end": 424, |
|
"text": "(Clifton and Sarkar, 2011)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF9" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 446, |
|
"end": 474, |
|
"text": "(Seeker and \u00c7etinoglu, 2015)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF55" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 494, |
|
"end": 519, |
|
"text": "(Narasimhan et al., 2014)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF46" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 561, |
|
"end": 581, |
|
"text": "(Afify et al., 2006)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF0" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Introduction", |
|
"sec_num": "1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Another motivation for our experiments lies in the fact that previous research on morphological segmentation has mostly concentrated on Indo-European languages in high-resource settings (Goldsmith, 2001; Cotterell et al., 2016b) , sometimes relying on external large-scale corpora in order to derive morpheme or lexical frequency information (Cotterell et al., 2015; Ruokolainen et al., 2014; Lind\u00e9n et al., 2009) . By contrast, work on morphological segmentation of augmented low-resource settings or truly underresourced languages is lacking in general (Kann et al., 2016) . Hence demonstrations of what model architecture and training settings could be beneficial with data sets of very small size would be informative to other researchers whose work shares similar goals and ethical considerations as ours.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 186, |
|
"end": 203, |
|
"text": "(Goldsmith, 2001;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF23" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 204, |
|
"end": 228, |
|
"text": "Cotterell et al., 2016b)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF12" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 342, |
|
"end": 366, |
|
"text": "(Cotterell et al., 2015;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF11" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 367, |
|
"end": 392, |
|
"text": "Ruokolainen et al., 2014;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF54" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 393, |
|
"end": 413, |
|
"text": "Lind\u00e9n et al., 2009)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF40" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 555, |
|
"end": 574, |
|
"text": "(Kann et al., 2016)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF34" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Introduction", |
|
"sec_num": "1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Following recently advocated scientific practices (Bender and Friedman, 2018; Gebru et al., 2018) , we would like to first introduce the data of the indigenous languages to be explored.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 50, |
|
"end": 77, |
|
"text": "(Bender and Friedman, 2018;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF7" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 78, |
|
"end": 97, |
|
"text": "Gebru et al., 2018)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF22" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Data Statements", |
|
"sec_num": "2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "The protagonist in our experiments is Seneca, the data of which came from three sources: the book The Seneca Verb: Labeling the Ancient Voice by Bardeau 20071 , informal transcriptions provided by members from the community, and a recently digitized Bible translated into Seneca. The grammar book provides morphological segmentation for only verbs and the morpheme boundaries were based on rules defined by grammarians. By contrast, the informal sources contain labeled segmentation for a mix of verbs and nouns conducted by community speakers. The Bible offers only unlabeled data. One of the most distinct features of Seneca morphology is that it is highly polysynthetic. This means that a single word can consist of multiple morphemes and may contain more than one stem; and this single word is able to express the meaning of a whole phrase or even sentences at times (Aikhenvald et al., 2007; Greenberg, 1960) . As a demonstration, consider the following example (the indicated morphological characteristics here abide by the annotation standards of Sylak-Glassman (2016)). Breaking the Seneca word into individual morphemes, ye:n\u00f6 is the stem which has the verbal meaning of grab in present tense; the prefix ke denotes that ye:n\u00f6 is a transitive action, with I being the subject and her/them being the object; the single apostrophe ' at the end marks the 1 https://senecalanguage.com/ wp-content/uploads/Verb-Book-Vol.1.pdf stative state.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 871, |
|
"end": 896, |
|
"text": "(Aikhenvald et al., 2007;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 897, |
|
"end": 913, |
|
"text": "Greenberg, 1960)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF27" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Data Statements", |
|
"sec_num": "2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "(1) keyen\u00f6' ke I+her/them yen\u00f6 grab ' STAT I've grabbed her/them.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Data Statements", |
|
"sec_num": "2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "A large number of words in Seneca have agglutinative morphological features, meaning when multiple morphemes are combined during word formation, their original forms remain unchanged. Consider the example presented above again. When the prefix and the stem are combined into the word, neither of them goes through any phonological and orthographic changes.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Data Statements", |
|
"sec_num": "2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "On the other hand, Seneca also has fusional properties; this means that during the formation of some words, the combining morphemes can undergo phonological (and orthographical) changes. As an illustration, consider the following word in Seneca. When combining the four morphemes together, the masculine singular subject hra, the verb stem k and the s that marks habitual state do not undergo any changes; whereas the initial i is replaced with \u00ed to make sure that the verbs or verb phrases have at least two syllables (Chafe, 2015). In addition to Seneca, we include four Mexican indigenous languages from the Yuto-Aztecan language family (Baker, 1997) for our crosslinguisitic training experiments: Mexicanero (888 words), Nahuatl (1,123 words), Wixarika (1,385 words), and Yorem Nokki (1,063 words). The data for these languages contains morphological segmentation that was initially digitized from the book collections of Archive of Indigenous Language (Mexicanero (Una, 2001 ), Nahuatl (de Su\u00e1rez, 1980 , Wixarika (G\u00f3mez and L\u00f3pez, 1999) , Yorem Nokki (Freeze, 1989)). The data collection was carried out by the authors of Kann et al. (2018) based on the descriptions in their work, and their preprocessed data sets are publicly available. The four Yuto-Aztecan languages are also polysynthetic.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 969, |
|
"end": 979, |
|
"text": "(Una, 2001", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF63" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 980, |
|
"end": 1007, |
|
"text": "), Nahuatl (de Su\u00e1rez, 1980", |
|
"ref_id": null |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1019, |
|
"end": 1042, |
|
"text": "(G\u00f3mez and L\u00f3pez, 1999)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF25" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1128, |
|
"end": 1146, |
|
"text": "Kann et al. (2018)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF35" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Data Statements", |
|
"sec_num": "2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "The task of morphological segmentation has been cast in distinct ways in previous work. One line of research focuses on surface segmentation (Ruokolainen et al., 2016) , while the other attends to canonical segmentation (Cotterell et al., 2016b) . Both involve correctly decomposing a given word into distinct morphemes, which also typically includes words that stand alone as free morphemes. Nevertheless, the two tasks differ in one key aspect: whether the combination 2 of the segmented morpheme sequence stays true to the initial orthography of the word. For surface segmentation, the answer is yes (e.g., Indonnesian dihapus \u2192 di+hapus). On the other hand, canonical segmentation sometimes involves the addition and/or deletion of characters from the surface form of the initial word, in order to capture phonological or orthographic characteristics of the component morphemes when uncombined. For example, the word measurable in English would be segmented as measure + able, recovering the orthographic e that was lost during word formation. For surface segmentation, both supervised and unsupervised approaches have gained in popularity over the years. Within the realm of supervised methods, a large number of experiments have developed rule-based finite-state transducers (FST) (Kaplan and Kay, 1994) with weights usually determined by rich linguistic feature sets. The high functionality of hand-crafted FST for morphological analyses has been demonstrated for languages such as Persian (Amtrup, 2003 ), Finnish (Lind\u00e9n et al., 2009 , Semitic languages such as Tigrinya (Gasser, 2009) and Arabic (Beesley, 1996; Shaalan and Attia, 2012) , as well as various African languages (Gasser, 2011) . Other work has shifted to more data-driven machine learning techniques, including but not limited to memory-based learning (van den Bosch and Daelemans, 1999; Marsi et al., 2005) , conditional random field models (CRF) (Cotterell et al., 2015; Ruokolainen et al., 2013 Ruokolainen et al., , 2014 , and convolutional networks (Sorokin and Kravtsova, 2018; Sorokin, 2019) .", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 141, |
|
"end": 167, |
|
"text": "(Ruokolainen et al., 2016)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF52" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 220, |
|
"end": 245, |
|
"text": "(Cotterell et al., 2016b)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF12" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1497, |
|
"end": 1510, |
|
"text": "(Amtrup, 2003", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1511, |
|
"end": 1542, |
|
"text": "), Finnish (Lind\u00e9n et al., 2009", |
|
"ref_id": null |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1580, |
|
"end": 1594, |
|
"text": "(Gasser, 2009)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF20" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1606, |
|
"end": 1621, |
|
"text": "(Beesley, 1996;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF6" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1622, |
|
"end": 1646, |
|
"text": "Shaalan and Attia, 2012)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF56" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1686, |
|
"end": 1700, |
|
"text": "(Gasser, 2011)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF21" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1835, |
|
"end": 1861, |
|
"text": "Bosch and Daelemans, 1999;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF64" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1862, |
|
"end": 1881, |
|
"text": "Marsi et al., 2005)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF42" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1922, |
|
"end": 1946, |
|
"text": "(Cotterell et al., 2015;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF11" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1947, |
|
"end": 1971, |
|
"text": "Ruokolainen et al., 2013", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF53" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 1972, |
|
"end": 1998, |
|
"text": "Ruokolainen et al., , 2014", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF54" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 2028, |
|
"end": 2057, |
|
"text": "(Sorokin and Kravtsova, 2018;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF59" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 2058, |
|
"end": 2072, |
|
"text": "Sorokin, 2019)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF57" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Related Work", |
|
"sec_num": "3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Unsupervised methods have perhaps enjoyed a longer history (Harris, 1955) , with earlier studies relying on information-theoretic measures as indexes of character-level predictability, which were then used to determine morpheme boundaries (Hafer and Weiss, 1974) . Later work such as Linguistica (Goldsmith, 2001) and Morfessor (Creutz and Lagus, 2002) applied the analyses of Minimum Description Length for morpheme induction (Rissanen, 1998; Poon et al., 2009) . developed Bayesian generative models that would also take into account the context of individual words, which were able to simulate the process of how children learn to segment words given child-directed speech.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 59, |
|
"end": 73, |
|
"text": "(Harris, 1955)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF30" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 239, |
|
"end": 262, |
|
"text": "(Hafer and Weiss, 1974)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF28" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 296, |
|
"end": 313, |
|
"text": "(Goldsmith, 2001)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF23" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 328, |
|
"end": 352, |
|
"text": "(Creutz and Lagus, 2002)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF13" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 427, |
|
"end": 443, |
|
"text": "(Rissanen, 1998;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF50" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 444, |
|
"end": 462, |
|
"text": "Poon et al., 2009)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF49" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Related Work", |
|
"sec_num": "3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "In contrast to surface segmentation, the problem of canonical segmentation has mainly been addressed with supervised methods. Cotterell et al. (2016b) extended a previous semi-CRF (Cotterell et al., 2015) for surface segmentation to jointly predict morpheme boundaries and orthographic changes, leading to improved results for German and Indonesian. With the same datasets, Kann et al. (2016) adopted character-based neural sequence models coupled with a neural reranker, presenting further improvement from Cotterell et al. (2016b) . There has, however, been some unsupervised induction of canonical segmentation (see Hammarstr\u00f6m and Borin (2011) for a thorough review). For instance, Dasgupta and Ng (2007) showed that certain spelling rules (e.g. insertion, deletion) derived heuristically from corpus frequency were able to handle orthographic changes during word formation. In comparison, Naradowsky and Goldwater (2009) provided a Bayesian model that formulate spelling rules probabilistically with character-level contextual information; the simultaneous learning process of both the rules and morpheme boundaries in turn boosted segmentation performance.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 126, |
|
"end": 150, |
|
"text": "Cotterell et al. (2016b)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF12" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 180, |
|
"end": 204, |
|
"text": "(Cotterell et al., 2015)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF11" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 508, |
|
"end": 532, |
|
"text": "Cotterell et al. (2016b)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF12" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 619, |
|
"end": 647, |
|
"text": "Hammarstr\u00f6m and Borin (2011)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF29" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 686, |
|
"end": 708, |
|
"text": "Dasgupta and Ng (2007)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF14" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 894, |
|
"end": 925, |
|
"text": "Naradowsky and Goldwater (2009)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF45" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Related Work", |
|
"sec_num": "3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Although Seneca has fusional morphological features, meaning that certain morpheme boundaries within words are not necessarily clear-cut, the Seneca morphological data currently does not provide labeled canonical segmentation. We therefore focus on the task of surface segmentation.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Related Work", |
|
"sec_num": "3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "As mentioned in Section 2, the labeled words for Seneca came from both the verbal paradigm book by Bardeau (2007) and informal sources. We treated the two sources as separate domains and constructed a dataset for each. The number of morphemes per word on average in the grammar book is 3.87 (95% confidence intervals: (3.86, 3.88); see Section 4.4), which is slightly lower than that in the informal sources (4.12 (4.10, 4.13)). On the other hand, the number of unique morphemes is much higher in the data from the informal sources (N = 1,641) than that in the grammar book (N = 631). This difference in the amount of morphological variation between the two domains raises the expectation that with the same model architecture, morphological segmentation of the words from the informal sources is possibly more challenging.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 99, |
|
"end": 113, |
|
"text": "Bardeau (2007)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF5" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Data preprocessing", |
|
"sec_num": "4.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "For each data set, to construct the low-resource settings, we set the train/dev/test ratio to be 2:1:2, then randomly generated five splits for every dataset with this ratio (Gorman and Bedrick, 2019) . 3 We used the first random split of both domains for model evaluation as well as selection of training settings; the setting(s) eventually selected would then be applied to data from each of the five random splits to test the stability of the model performance.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 174, |
|
"end": 200, |
|
"text": "(Gorman and Bedrick, 2019)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF26" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 203, |
|
"end": 204, |
|
"text": "3", |
|
"ref_id": null |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Data preprocessing", |
|
"sec_num": "4.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "We took advantage of the fact that the two data sets for Seneca came from different domains by investigating two experimental designs: evaluating with a development set versus evaluating with a development domain. The former carried out the standard practices. When building models for morphological segmentation of a particular domain, only the in-domain training set would be (part of) the training data for the models, along with possible addition of training data from the other domain or indigenous languages. The development set from the same domain would be used to evaluate models and the one(s) with the best performance would be selected (e.g. segmentation for the grammar book data using the development set of the grammar book for evaluation). However, realistically development sets are luxuries to critically endangered languages (Kann et al., 3 Data, code, and models are available at https:// github.com/zoeyliu18/Seneca. 2019). To help with the documentation of these languages more effectively, one would want to use as much training data as possible, ideally from the same domain or language. Yet acquiring more data for languages like Seneca, whether with or without manual annotations, faces extreme difficulty. It requires not only extensive time and financial resources, but also expertise from the very few native speakers left, most of whom are elders.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 844, |
|
"end": 857, |
|
"text": "(Kann et al.,", |
|
"ref_id": null |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 858, |
|
"end": 859, |
|
"text": "3", |
|
"ref_id": null |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Evaluation design", |
|
"sec_num": "4.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "To increase the utility of the already-limited data for Seneca, we experimented with a second design of using a development domain for model evaluation. That is, for morphological segmentation of a particular domain, the new in-domain training data would be the concatenation of the initial training set along with the development set from the same domain. This new combination would be (part of) the training data for the models. In this case the development set of the other domain would then be applied instead to evaluate model performance (e.g. segmentation for the grammar book using the development set of the informal sources for evaluation). Again, the model(s) with the best performance on the development domain would be selected.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Evaluation design", |
|
"sec_num": "4.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Comparing the two designs, taking into account the different configurations of the training data, it is possible that evaluation with a development domain would lead to different model architectures/settings being selected. On the other hand, it is also possible that the same model architecture or setting would be favored regardless of the particular design. In addition, because using a development domain essentially means that there is more indomain training data, it remains to be seen whether this evaluation design would achieve better results when testing the stability of the model setting.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Evaluation design", |
|
"sec_num": "4.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "We experimented with three general settings: indomain training, cross-domain training, and crosslinguistic training. For all settings, we adopted character-based sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) recurrent neural network (RNN) (Elman, 1990) trained with OpenNMT (Klein et al., 2017) . This model architecture has been previously demonstrated to perform well for polysynthetic indigenous languages (Kann et al., 2018) .", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 259, |
|
"end": 279, |
|
"text": "(Klein et al., 2017)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF37" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 394, |
|
"end": 413, |
|
"text": "(Kann et al., 2018)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF35" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Model training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "In cases where applicable, we also compared the performance of the neural seq2seq models to unsupervised Morfessor 4 (Creutz and Lagus, 2002) . In what follows, we describe the details of the seq2seq models in each training setting.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 117, |
|
"end": 141, |
|
"text": "(Creutz and Lagus, 2002)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF13" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Model training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Naive baseline Our first baseline applied the default parameters in OpenNMT -an encoder-decoder long-short term memory model (LSTM) (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997) with the attention mechanism from Luong et al. (2015) . All embeddings have 500 dimensions. Both the encoder and the decoder contain two hidden layers with 500 hidden units in each layer. Training was performed with SGD (Robbins and Monro, 1951) and a batch size of 64. Abiding by our experimental designs, for all the baseline models, when evaluating with the development set, the in-domain training data came from just the training set. By contrast, when evaluating with the development domain, the in-domain training data was the concatenation of the training and the development sets.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 132, |
|
"end": 166, |
|
"text": "(Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF31" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 201, |
|
"end": 220, |
|
"text": "Luong et al. (2015)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF41" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 387, |
|
"end": 412, |
|
"text": "(Robbins and Monro, 1951)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF51" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "In-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Less naive baseline Going beyond the default settings in the first baseline, our second baseline experimented with different combinations of parameter settings and attention mechanisms (Bahdanau et al., 2015 ):", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 185, |
|
"end": 207, |
|
"text": "(Bahdanau et al., 2015", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF3" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "In-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "\u2022 RNN type: LSTM / GRU \u2022 embedding dimesions: {128, 300, 500}", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "In-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "\u2022 hidden layers: {1, 2}", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "In-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "\u2022 hidden units: {128, 300, 500}", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "In-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "\u2022 batch size: {16, 32, 64}", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "In-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "\u2022 optimizer: SGD / ADADELTA (Zeiler, 2012) These models were trained and evaluated in the same way as the first baseline. Based on results from either the development set or the development domain (after statistical tests; see Section 4.4), the model architecture that was selected was an attention-based encoder-decoder (Bahdanau et al., 2015) , where the encoder is composed of a bidirectional GRU while the decoder consists of a unidirectional GRU. Both the encoder and the decoder have two hidden layers with 100 hidden states in each layer. All embeddings have 300 dimensions. Training was performed with ADADELTA and a batch size of 16.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 321, |
|
"end": 344, |
|
"text": "(Bahdanau et al., 2015)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF3" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "In-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "sor (Kohonen et al., 2010) was also explored; yet the performance was worse than the unsupervised method. Thus we eventually chose the unsupervised variant for systematic comparisons with the seq2seq models.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 4, |
|
"end": 26, |
|
"text": "(Kohonen et al., 2010)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF38" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "In-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "With the model architecture of our less naive baseline, we turned to our cross-domain training experiments using four different methods.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Self-training The first method utilized selftraining (McClosky et al., 2008) and resorted to the unlabeled words from the Bible, which were first automatically segmented with the second baseline model from in-domain training. These words were then added to the in-domain training data given each of the two evaluation designs (Section 4.2).", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 53, |
|
"end": 76, |
|
"text": "(McClosky et al., 2008)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF43" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Multi-task learning The second method applied multi-task learning (Kann et al., 2018) . In this case, in addition to the task of morphological segmentation, we added a new task where the training objective is to generate output that is identical to the input. In the seq2seq model, the decoder does not always generate every character in the input sequence, which prevents accurate morphological segmentation of the full word. Thus the ulterior goal of this additional task is simple yet important: helping the model learn to copy.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 66, |
|
"end": 85, |
|
"text": "(Kann et al., 2018)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF35" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "In particular, words from the in-domain training data were used for the segmentation task, while words from the Bible were used for mapping input to output. Every word in the eventual training data was appended with a task-specific input symbol. For instance, let X represent the task of morphological segmentation, Y the task of mapping input to output, the goal of the model is to jointly perform the following :", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "\u2022 \u00ebw\u00ebn\u00f6tg\u00ebh + X \u2192 \u00eb + w\u00ebn + \u00f6tg\u00ebh \u2022 oiwa' + Y \u2192 oiwa'", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Transfer learning The third method adopts domain transfer learning. Consider morphological segmentation of the grammar book as an example. When using a development set, the in-domain training data, which includes only the training set of the grammar book, would be combined with all data from the informal sources. On the other hand, when using a development domain, the indomain training data, which includes the training and development sets of the grammar book, would be concatenated with just the training and test sets from the informal sources.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Fine-tuning With the model trained from transfer learning, we fine-tuned it further with in-domain training data.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "One point to note is when evaluating with a development domain, we expected that the model trained with domain transfer learning (with finetuning) would yield the best results. However, these results would not be directly informative about whether this setting is indeed better than the others, the latter of which only included in-domain training data. Hence for this particular evaluation design, while we still carried out the domain transfer experiments for consistency, we selected models only based on the other training settings.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-domain training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "In order to examine whether data from other polysynthetic languages would improve model performance, we carried out cross-linguistic training with three different settings: multi-task learning, transfer learning (Kann et al., 2018) , and finetuning. These settings are similar to those in crossdomain training, except that the data from the four Mexican languages was used as additional training data instead of the Bible or out-of-domain data.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 212, |
|
"end": 231, |
|
"text": "(Kann et al., 2018)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF35" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Cross-linguistic training", |
|
"sec_num": "4.3.3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Three measures were computed as indexes of model performance (Cotterell et al., 2016a; van den Bosch and Daelemans, 1999) : full form accuracy, morpheme F1, and average Levenshtein distance (Levenshtein, 1966) . Significance testing of each metric was conducted with bootstrapping (Efron and Tibshirani, 1994) . As an illustration, take full form accuracy as an example. After applying a model to the development set (or domain) with a total of N words, we: (1) randomly selected N words from the development set with replacement; (2) calculated the full form accuracy of the selected sample; (3) repeated step (1) and (2) for 10,000 iterations, which yielded an empirical distribution of full form accuracy; (4) measured the mean and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the empirical distribution.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 61, |
|
"end": 86, |
|
"text": "(Cotterell et al., 2016a;", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF10" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 87, |
|
"end": 121, |
|
"text": "van den Bosch and Daelemans, 1999)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF64" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 190, |
|
"end": 209, |
|
"text": "(Levenshtein, 1966)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF39" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 281, |
|
"end": 309, |
|
"text": "(Efron and Tibshirani, 1994)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF17" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Metrics", |
|
"sec_num": "4.4" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "For evaluation, we considered a training setting to be better than another based on at least one of the three metrics calculated. As presented in Table 2 , when evaluating with the development set, it appears that for the grammar book, the simple less naive baseline with careful parameter tuning is able to yield excellent performance, while other more complicated training configurations such as including additional out-of-domain data do not lead to further improvement (no significant differences in the results). Therefore we chose the less naive baseline from in-domain training for the final testing given its simplicity and average score for each of the three metrics.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 146, |
|
"end": 153, |
|
"text": "Table 2", |
|
"ref_id": "TABREF3" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Evaluation with development set", |
|
"sec_num": "5.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "By contrast, with the same training settings, the models show weaker performance for informal sources. This corresponds to our initial expectation that due to the higher number of unique morphemes in informal sources, accurately labeling the boundaries of these morphemes would be comparatively more challenging. Similar to results for the grammar book, none of the other training configurations seems to significantly surpass the two baselines. With that being said, we selected the cross-linguistic training with multi-task learning for the final testing, again because it has the best average score for each of the three measures.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Evaluation with development set", |
|
"sec_num": "5.1" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "On the other hand, when evaluating with the development domain, as shown in Table 3 , almost all other training configurations appear to be better than the two baselines, a pattern that holds for data from the grammar book as well as that from the informal sources. When compared to the two baselines, while the other settings do not show significant improvement in terms of accuracy or F1 score, the average Levenshtein distance is shorter when the models are trained with multi-task learning and/or additional cross-linguistic data. Given the results, for both the grammar book and the informal sources, we selected cross-domain multi-task learning as the setting for final model testing.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 76, |
|
"end": 83, |
|
"text": "Table 3", |
|
"ref_id": "TABREF4" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Evaluation with development domain", |
|
"sec_num": "5.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Combining the results from Table 2 and Table 3 together, it appears that regardless of the particular evaluation design, in any of the settings where unsupervised Morfessor is applicable (Creutz and Lagus, 2002) , the neural encoder-decoder models consistently yielded significantly better performance in relation to all three measures. This observation also speaks to previous findings from Kann et al. (2018) , except that they adopted semi-supervised variants of Morfessor.", |
|
"cite_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 187, |
|
"end": 211, |
|
"text": "(Creutz and Lagus, 2002)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF13" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"start": 392, |
|
"end": 410, |
|
"text": "Kann et al. (2018)", |
|
"ref_id": "BIBREF35" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"ref_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 27, |
|
"end": 46, |
|
"text": "Table 2 and Table 3", |
|
"ref_id": "TABREF3" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Evaluation with development domain", |
|
"sec_num": "5.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Comparing the segmentation results from the seq2seq models to those from Morfessor, overall there does not seem to be aspects where the latter systematically falls short, in the sense that the segmentation patterns by Morfessor are more or less \"all over the place\". One potential explanation lies in the fact that in both our data sets, the majority of the words have a frequency of one (95.28% for the grammar book; 95.57% for the informal sources). On the other hand, successful segmentation by unsupervised Morfessor relies heavily on the frequency of a given word and accordingly the number of overlapping or common morphemes shared by different words, whether the occurrence frequency information was computed from the training data or from additional unlabeled data. In addition to the complex morphological features of Seneca and the high frequency of unique morphemes in the two data sets used in our experiments, the Bible dataset, despite containing more unlabeled words, is still relatively small (N = 8,588), and thus is not especially useful for deriving frequency estimates.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Evaluation with development domain", |
|
"sec_num": "5.2" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "For both the grammar book and the informal sources, we tested the stability of the selected model settings across the five random splits (Section 4.1). With each random split, we trained a model following the selected setting for each of the evaluation designs; the model was then applied to the test set of the random split.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Testing", |
|
"sec_num": "5.3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Based on Figure 1 , within each evaluation design, the test performance of the model setting is stable across the random splits. Morphological segmentation of data from the grammar book was able to achieve consistently better results than that for the informal sources. Regardless of the data source, while there does not appear to be significant differences in model performance between the two evaluation designs, comparing to using a development set, evaluating with a development domain led to slight improvement of average scores for each of the three metrics.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [ |
|
{ |
|
"start": 9, |
|
"end": 17, |
|
"text": "Figure 1", |
|
"ref_id": "FIGREF1" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Testing", |
|
"sec_num": "5.3" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "We have investigated morphological segmentation for Seneca, an indigenous Native American language with highly complex morphological characteristics. In a series of in-domain, cross-domain, and cross-linguistic training settings, the results demonstrate that neural seq2seq models are quite effective at correctly labeling morpheme boundaries, at least at the surface level. With the two evaluation designs explored here, the model settings were able to achieve above 96% F1 score for data from the grammar book, and above 85% for the informal sources.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Conclusions and Future Work", |
|
"sec_num": "6" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Many of the languages indigenous to North America are as endangered as Seneca and have available resources comparable in both size and scope to those used in the current work. Our thorough investigation of how to effectively integrate these limited and varied resources can potentially serve as a model for other community-driven collaborations to document endangered languages for future generations, and to produce materials suitable for language immersion and revitalization. For our future work, in addition to refining and improving our models, we also plan to explore the utility of morphological segmentation for improving language modeling in ASR. This would be able to support transcription of both archival recordings and new recordings captured by community members involved in language revitalization projects.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Conclusions and Future Work", |
|
"sec_num": "6" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "Here we used the term combination instead of concatenation, because surface segmentation is applicable to words with concatenative morphology as well as those with nonconcatenative morphology.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "", |
|
"sec_num": null |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"text": "In preliminary experiments, semi-supervised Morfes-", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "", |
|
"sec_num": null |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"back_matter": [ |
|
{ |
|
"text": "We are grateful for the cooperation and support of the Seneca Nation of Indians. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1761562. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.", |
|
"cite_spans": [], |
|
"ref_spans": [], |
|
"eq_spans": [], |
|
"section": "Acknowledgements", |
|
"sec_num": null |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"bib_entries": { |
|
"BIBREF0": { |
|
"ref_id": "b0", |
|
"title": "On the use of morphological analysis for dialectal arabic speech recognition", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Mohamed", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Afify", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Ruhi", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sarikaya", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hong-Kwang Jeff", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kuo", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Laurent", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Besacier", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Yuqing", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Gao", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2006, |
|
"venue": "Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Mohamed Afify, Ruhi Sarikaya, Hong-Kwang Jeff Kuo, Laurent Besacier, and Yuqing Gao. 2006. On the use of morphological analysis for dialectal ara- bic speech recognition. In Ninth International Con- ference on Spoken Language Processing.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF1": { |
|
"ref_id": "b1", |
|
"title": "Typological distinctions in word-formation. Language typology and syntactic description", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Y", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Alexandra", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Aikhenvald", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2007, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "3", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "1--65", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Alexandra Y Aikhenvald et al. 2007. Typological dis- tinctions in word-formation. Language typology and syntactic description, 3:1-65.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF2": { |
|
"ref_id": "b2", |
|
"title": "Morphology in machine translation systems: Efficient integration of finite state transducers and feature structure descriptions", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "W", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Jan", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Amtrup", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2003, |
|
"venue": "Machine Translation", |
|
"volume": "18", |
|
"issue": "3", |
|
"pages": "217--238", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Jan W Amtrup. 2003. Morphology in machine trans- lation systems: Efficient integration of finite state transducers and feature structure descriptions. Ma- chine Translation, 18(3):217-238.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF3": { |
|
"ref_id": "b3", |
|
"title": "Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Dzmitry", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Bahdanau", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Kyung", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"Hyun" |
|
], |
|
"last": "Cho", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Yoshua", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Bengio", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2015, |
|
"venue": "3rd International Conference on Learning Representations", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyung Hyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In 3rd Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF4": { |
|
"ref_id": "b4", |
|
"title": "Complex predicates and agreement in polysynthetic languages. Complex predicates", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "C", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Mark", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Baker", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1997, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "247--288", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Mark C Baker. 1997. Complex predicates and agree- ment in polysynthetic languages. Complex predi- cates, pages 247-288.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF5": { |
|
"ref_id": "b5", |
|
"title": "The Seneca Verb: Labeling the Ancient Voice. Seneca Nation Education Department", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Phyllis", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"E" |
|
], |
|
"last": "Wms", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Bardeau", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2007, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Phyllis E. Wms. Bardeau. 2007. The Seneca Verb: La- beling the Ancient Voice. Seneca Nation Education Department, Cattaraugus Territory.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF6": { |
|
"ref_id": "b6", |
|
"title": "Arabic finite-state morphological analysis and generation", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "R", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kenneth", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Beesley", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1996, |
|
"venue": "The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "1", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Kenneth R Beesley. 1996. Arabic finite-state morpho- logical analysis and generation. In COLING 1996 Volume 1: The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF7": { |
|
"ref_id": "b7", |
|
"title": "Data statements for natural language processing: Toward mitigating system bias and enabling better science", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Emily", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"M" |
|
], |
|
"last": "Bender", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Batya", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Friedman", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2018, |
|
"venue": "Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "6", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "587--604", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.1162/tacl_a_00041" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Emily M. Bender and Batya Friedman. 2018. Data statements for natural language processing: Toward mitigating system bias and enabling better science. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6:587-604.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF8": { |
|
"ref_id": "b8", |
|
"title": "A Grammar of the Seneca Language", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Wallace L Chafe", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2015, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "149", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Wallace L Chafe. 2015. A Grammar of the Seneca Lan- guage, volume 149. University of California Press.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF9": { |
|
"ref_id": "b9", |
|
"title": "Combining morpheme-based machine translation with postprocessing morpheme prediction", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Ann", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Clifton", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Anoop", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sarkar", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2011, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "32--42", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Ann Clifton and Anoop Sarkar. 2011. Combin- ing morpheme-based machine translation with post- processing morpheme prediction. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics: Human Language Technolo- gies, pages 32-42, Portland, Oregon, USA. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF10": { |
|
"ref_id": "b10", |
|
"title": "Morphological segmentation inside-out", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Ryan", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Cotterell", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Arun", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kumar", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hinrich", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sch\u00fctze", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2016, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "2325--2330", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.18653/v1/D16-1256" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Ryan Cotterell, Arun Kumar, and Hinrich Sch\u00fctze. 2016a. Morphological segmentation inside-out. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2325-2330, Austin, Texas. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF11": { |
|
"ref_id": "b11", |
|
"title": "Labeled morphological segmentation with semi-Markov models", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Ryan", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Cotterell", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Thomas", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "M\u00fcller", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Alexander", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Fraser", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hinrich", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sch\u00fctze", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2015, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the Nineteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "164--174", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.18653/v1/K15-1017" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Ryan Cotterell, Thomas M\u00fcller, Alexander Fraser, and Hinrich Sch\u00fctze. 2015. Labeled morphological seg- mentation with semi-Markov models. In Proceed- ings of the Nineteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 164-174, Bei- jing, China. Association for Computational Linguis- tics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF12": { |
|
"ref_id": "b12", |
|
"title": "A joint model of orthography and morphological segmentation", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Ryan", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Cotterell", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Tim", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Vieira", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hinrich", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sch\u00fctze", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2016, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "664--669", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.18653/v1/N16-1080" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Ryan Cotterell, Tim Vieira, and Hinrich Sch\u00fctze. 2016b. A joint model of orthography and morpho- logical segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 664-669, San Diego, California. Association for Computational Linguis- tics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF13": { |
|
"ref_id": "b13", |
|
"title": "Unsupervised discovery of morphemes", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Mathias", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Creutz", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Krista", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Lagus", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2002, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "21--30", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.3115/1118647.1118650" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Mathias Creutz and Krista Lagus. 2002. Unsupervised discovery of morphemes. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonolog- ical Learning, pages 21-30. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF14": { |
|
"ref_id": "b14", |
|
"title": "Highperformance, language-independent morphological segmentation", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sajib", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Dasgupta", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Vincent", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Ng", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2007, |
|
"venue": "Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Sajib Dasgupta and Vincent Ng. 2007. High- performance, language-independent morphological segmentation. In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics;", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF15": { |
|
"ref_id": "b15", |
|
"title": "Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
"authors": [], |
|
"year": null, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "155--163", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Proceedings of the Main Conference, pages 155- 163, Rochester, New York. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF16": { |
|
"ref_id": "b16", |
|
"title": "N\u00e1huatl de Acaxochitl\u00e1n (Hidalgo)", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Yolanda", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Lastra De Su\u00e1rez", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1980, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Yolanda Lastra de Su\u00e1rez. 1980. N\u00e1huatl de Acaxo- chitl\u00e1n (Hidalgo). El Colegio de M\u00e9xico.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF17": { |
|
"ref_id": "b17", |
|
"title": "An introduction to the bootstrap", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Bradley", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Efron", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "J", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Robert", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Tibshirani", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1994, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Bradley Efron and Robert J Tibshirani. 1994. An intro- duction to the bootstrap. CRC press.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF18": { |
|
"ref_id": "b18", |
|
"title": "Finding structure in time", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Jeffrey L Elman", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1990, |
|
"venue": "Cognitive science", |
|
"volume": "14", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "179--211", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Jeffrey L Elman. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cog- nitive science, 14(2):179-211.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF19": { |
|
"ref_id": "b19", |
|
"title": "Mayo de Los Capomos", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Ray A Freeze", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1989, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Ray A Freeze. 1989. Mayo de Los Capomos, Sinaloa. El Colegio de M\u00e9xico.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF20": { |
|
"ref_id": "b20", |
|
"title": "Semitic morphological analysis and generation using finite state transducers with feature structures", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Michael", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Gasser", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2009, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "309--317", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Michael Gasser. 2009. Semitic morphological analy- sis and generation using finite state transducers with feature structures. In Proceedings of the 12th Con- ference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009), pages 309-317.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF21": { |
|
"ref_id": "b21", |
|
"title": "Hornmorpho: a system for morphological processing of amharic, oromo, and tigrinya", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Michael", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Gasser", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2011, |
|
"venue": "Conference on Human Language Technology for Development", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Michael Gasser. 2011. Hornmorpho: a system for morphological processing of amharic, oromo, and tigrinya. In Conference on Human Language Tech- nology for Development, Alexandria, Egypt.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF22": { |
|
"ref_id": "b22", |
|
"title": "Datasheets for datasets", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Timnit", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Gebru", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Jamie", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Morgenstern", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Briana", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Vecchione", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Jennifer", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"Wortman" |
|
], |
|
"last": "Vaughan", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hanna", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Wallach", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hal", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Daum\u00e9", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Iii", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Kate", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Crawford", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2018, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daum\u00e9 III, and Kate Crawford. 2018. Datasheets for datasets. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Ma- chine Learning.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF23": { |
|
"ref_id": "b23", |
|
"title": "Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "John", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Goldsmith", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2001, |
|
"venue": "Computational linguistics", |
|
"volume": "27", |
|
"issue": "2", |
|
"pages": "153--198", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "John Goldsmith. 2001. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational linguistics, 27(2):153-198.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF24": { |
|
"ref_id": "b24", |
|
"title": "A bayesian framework for word segmentation: Exploring the effects of context", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sharon", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Goldwater", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "L", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Thomas", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Mark", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Griffiths", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Johnson", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2009, |
|
"venue": "Cognition", |
|
"volume": "112", |
|
"issue": "1", |
|
"pages": "21--54", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Sharon Goldwater, Thomas L Griffiths, and Mark John- son. 2009. A bayesian framework for word segmen- tation: Exploring the effects of context. Cognition, 112(1):21-54.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF25": { |
|
"ref_id": "b25", |
|
"title": "Huichol de", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Paula", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "G\u00f3mez", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Paula", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"G\u00f3mez" |
|
], |
|
"last": "L\u00f3pez", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1999, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Paula G\u00f3mez and Paula G\u00f3mez L\u00f3pez. 1999. Huichol de San Andr\u00e9s Cohamiata, Jalisco. El Colegio de M\u00e9xico.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF26": { |
|
"ref_id": "b26", |
|
"title": "We need to talk about standard splits", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Kyle", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Gorman", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Steven", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Bedrick", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2019, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "2786--2791", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.18653/v1/P19-1267" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Kyle Gorman and Steven Bedrick. 2019. We need to talk about standard splits. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics, pages 2786-2791, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF27": { |
|
"ref_id": "b27", |
|
"title": "A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "H", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Joseph", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Greenberg", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1960, |
|
"venue": "International journal of American linguistics", |
|
"volume": "26", |
|
"issue": "3", |
|
"pages": "178--194", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Joseph H Greenberg. 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. Inter- national journal of American linguistics, 26(3):178- 194.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF28": { |
|
"ref_id": "b28", |
|
"title": "Word segmentation by letter successor varieties. Information storage and retrieval", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "A", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Margaret", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Hafer", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "F", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Stephen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Weiss", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1974, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "10", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "371--385", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Margaret A Hafer and Stephen F Weiss. 1974. Word segmentation by letter successor varieties. Informa- tion storage and retrieval, 10(11-12):371-385.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF29": { |
|
"ref_id": "b29", |
|
"title": "Unsupervised learning of morphology", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Harald", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Hammarstr\u00f6m", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Lars", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Borin", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2011, |
|
"venue": "Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "37", |
|
"issue": "2", |
|
"pages": "309--350", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Harald Hammarstr\u00f6m and Lars Borin. 2011. Unsuper- vised learning of morphology. Computational Lin- guistics, 37(2):309-350.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF30": { |
|
"ref_id": "b30", |
|
"title": "From phoneme to morpheme", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "S", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Zellig", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Harris", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1955, |
|
"venue": "Language", |
|
"volume": "31", |
|
"issue": "2", |
|
"pages": "190--222", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Zellig S Harris. 1955. From phoneme to morpheme. Language, 31(2):190-222.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF31": { |
|
"ref_id": "b31", |
|
"title": "Long short-term memory", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sepp", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Hochreiter", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "J\u00fcrgen", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Schmidhuber", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1997, |
|
"venue": "Neural computation", |
|
"volume": "9", |
|
"issue": "8", |
|
"pages": "1735--1780", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Sepp Hochreiter and J\u00fcrgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735-1780.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF32": { |
|
"ref_id": "b32", |
|
"title": "ASR for documenting acutely under-resourced indigenous languages", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Robbie", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Jimerson", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Emily", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Prud", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "'", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Hommeaux", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2018, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018)", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Robbie Jimerson and Emily Prud'hommeaux. 2018. ASR for documenting acutely under-resourced in- digenous languages. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. Eu- ropean Language Resources Association (ELRA).", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF33": { |
|
"ref_id": "b33", |
|
"title": "Towards realistic practices in lowresource natural language processing: The development set", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Katharina", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kann", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Kyunghyun", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Cho", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Samuel", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"R" |
|
], |
|
"last": "Bowman", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2019, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "3342--3349", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.18653/v1/D19-1329" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Katharina Kann, Kyunghyun Cho, and Samuel R. Bow- man. 2019. Towards realistic practices in low- resource natural language processing: The develop- ment set. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natu- ral Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 3342-3349, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF34": { |
|
"ref_id": "b34", |
|
"title": "Neural morphological analysis: Encodingdecoding canonical segments", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Katharina", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kann", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Ryan", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Cotterell", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hinrich", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sch\u00fctze", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2016, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "961--967", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.18653/v1/D16-1097" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Katharina Kann, Ryan Cotterell, and Hinrich Sch\u00fctze. 2016. Neural morphological analysis: Encoding- decoding canonical segments. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing, pages 961-967, Austin, Texas. Association for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF35": { |
|
"ref_id": "b35", |
|
"title": "Fortification of neural morphological segmentation models for polysynthetic minimal-resource languages", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Katharina", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kann", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Jesus", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Manuel Mager", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Ivan", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"Vladimir" |
|
], |
|
"last": "Hois", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hinrich", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Meza-Ruiz", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sch\u00fctze", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2018, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies", |
|
"volume": "1", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "47--57", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.18653/v1/N18-1005" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Katharina Kann, Jesus Manuel Mager Hois, Ivan Vladimir Meza-Ruiz, and Hinrich Sch\u00fctze. 2018. Fortification of neural morphological segmen- tation models for polysynthetic minimal-resource languages. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 47-57, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF36": { |
|
"ref_id": "b36", |
|
"title": "Regular models of phonological rule systems", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "M", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Ronald", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Martin", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kaplan", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kay", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1994, |
|
"venue": "Computational linguistics", |
|
"volume": "20", |
|
"issue": "3", |
|
"pages": "331--378", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Ronald M Kaplan and Martin Kay. 1994. Regular mod- els of phonological rule systems. Computational lin- guistics, 20(3):331-378.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF37": { |
|
"ref_id": "b37", |
|
"title": "OpenNMT: Opensource toolkit for neural machine translation", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Guillaume", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Klein", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Yoon", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kim", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Yuntian", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Deng", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Jean", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Senellart", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Alexander", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Rush", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2017, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of ACL 2017, System Demonstrations", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "67--72", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Guillaume Klein, Yoon Kim, Yuntian Deng, Jean Senel- lart, and Alexander Rush. 2017. OpenNMT: Open- source toolkit for neural machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL 2017, System Demonstrations, pages 67-72, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF38": { |
|
"ref_id": "b38", |
|
"title": "Semi-supervised learning of concatenative morphology", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Oskar", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kohonen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sami", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Virpioja", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Krista", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Lagus", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2010, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "78--86", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Oskar Kohonen, Sami Virpioja, and Krista Lagus. 2010. Semi-supervised learning of concatenative morphol- ogy. In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Morphol- ogy and Phonology, pages 78-86.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF39": { |
|
"ref_id": "b39", |
|
"title": "Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Vladimir I Levenshtein", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1966, |
|
"venue": "Soviet physics doklady", |
|
"volume": "10", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "707--710", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Vladimir I Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. In Soviet physics doklady, volume 10, pages 707-710. Soviet Union.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF40": { |
|
"ref_id": "b40", |
|
"title": "Weighted finite-state morphological analysis of Finnish compounding with hfst-lexc", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Tommi", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Krister Lind\u00e9n", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Pirinen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2009, |
|
"venue": "NEALT Proceedings Series", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Krister Lind\u00e9n, Tommi Pirinen, et al. 2009. Weighted finite-state morphological analysis of Finnish com- pounding with hfst-lexc. In NEALT Proceedings Se- ries.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF41": { |
|
"ref_id": "b41", |
|
"title": "Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Thang", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Luong", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hieu", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Pham", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Christopher", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"D" |
|
], |
|
"last": "Manning", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2015, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "1412--1421", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.18653/v1/D15-1166" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Thang Luong, Hieu Pham, and Christopher D. Man- ning. 2015. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, pages 1412-1421, Lis- bon, Portugal. Association for Computational Lin- guistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF42": { |
|
"ref_id": "b42", |
|
"title": "Memory-based morphological analysis generation and part-of-speech tagging of Arabic", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Erwin", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Marsi", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Van Den", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Abdelhadi", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Bosch", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Soudi", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2005, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Semitic Languages", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "1--8", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Erwin Marsi, Antal van den Bosch, and Abdelhadi Soudi. 2005. Memory-based morphological analy- sis generation and part-of-speech tagging of Arabic. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Computa- tional Approaches to Semitic Languages, pages 1- 8, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF43": { |
|
"ref_id": "b43", |
|
"title": "When is self-training effective for parsing", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "David", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Mcclosky", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Eugene", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Charniak", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Mark", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Johnson", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2008, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "561--568", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "David McClosky, Eugene Charniak, and Mark Johnson. 2008. When is self-training effective for parsing? In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), pages 561-568, Manchester, UK. Coling 2008 Organizing Committee.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF44": { |
|
"ref_id": "b44", |
|
"title": "We are our language: An ethnography of language revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan community", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "A", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Barbra", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Meek", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2012, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Barbra A Meek. 2012. We are our language: An ethnography of language revitalization in a North- ern Athabaskan community. University of Arizona Press.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF45": { |
|
"ref_id": "b45", |
|
"title": "Improving morphology induction by learning spelling rules", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Jason", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Naradowsky", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sharon", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Goldwater", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2009, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "1531--1536", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Jason Naradowsky and Sharon Goldwater. 2009. Im- proving morphology induction by learning spelling rules. In Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence, pages 1531- 1536.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF46": { |
|
"ref_id": "b46", |
|
"title": "Morphological segmentation for keyword spotting", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Karthik", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Narasimhan", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Damianos", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Karakos", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Richard", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Schwartz", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Stavros", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Tsakalidis", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Regina", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Barzilay", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2014, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "880--885", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.3115/v1/D14-1095" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Karthik Narasimhan, Damianos Karakos, Richard Schwartz, Stavros Tsakalidis, and Regina Barzilay. 2014. Morphological segmentation for keyword spotting. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 880-885, Doha, Qatar. Association for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF48": { |
|
"ref_id": "b48", |
|
"title": "A summary of the first workshop on language technology for language documentation and revitalization", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Roshan", |
|
"middle": [ |
|
"S" |
|
], |
|
"last": "Xia", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Patrick", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sharma", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Littell", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2020, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-resourced languages (SLTU) and Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages (CCURL)", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "342--351", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Xia, Roshan S Sharma, and Patrick Littell. 2020. A summary of the first workshop on language technol- ogy for language documentation and revitalization. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-resourced lan- guages (SLTU) and Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages (CCURL), pages 342-351, Marseille, France. European Language Re- sources association.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF49": { |
|
"ref_id": "b49", |
|
"title": "Unsupervised morphological segmentation with log-linear models", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Hoifung", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Poon", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Colin", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Cherry", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Kristina", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Toutanova", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2009, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "209--217", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Hoifung Poon, Colin Cherry, and Kristina Toutanova. 2009. Unsupervised morphological segmentation with log-linear models. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics, pages 209-217.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF50": { |
|
"ref_id": "b50", |
|
"title": "Stochastic complexity in statistical inquiry", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Jorma", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Rissanen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1998, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "15", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Jorma Rissanen. 1998. Stochastic complexity in statis- tical inquiry, volume 15. World scientific.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF51": { |
|
"ref_id": "b51", |
|
"title": "A stochastic approximation method. The annals of mathematical statistics", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Herbert", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Robbins", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sutton", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Monro", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1951, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "400--407", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Herbert Robbins and Sutton Monro. 1951. A stochastic approximation method. The annals of mathematical statistics, pages 400-407.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF52": { |
|
"ref_id": "b52", |
|
"title": "A comparative study of minimally supervised morphological segmentation", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Oskar", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Teemu Ruokolainen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Kairit", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kohonen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Stig-Arne", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sirts", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Mikko", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Gr\u00f6nroos", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sami", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kurimo", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Virpioja", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2016, |
|
"venue": "Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "42", |
|
"issue": "1", |
|
"pages": "91--120", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.1162/COLI_a_00243" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Teemu Ruokolainen, Oskar Kohonen, Kairit Sirts, Stig- Arne Gr\u00f6nroos, Mikko Kurimo, and Sami Virpioja. 2016. A comparative study of minimally supervised morphological segmentation. Computational Lin- guistics, 42(1):91-120.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF53": { |
|
"ref_id": "b53", |
|
"title": "Supervised morphological segmentation in a low-resource learning setting using conditional random fields", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Oskar", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Teemu Ruokolainen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sami", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kohonen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Mikko", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Virpioja", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kurimo", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2013, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "29--37", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Teemu Ruokolainen, Oskar Kohonen, Sami Virpioja, and Mikko Kurimo. 2013. Supervised morpholog- ical segmentation in a low-resource learning setting using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Computational Nat- ural Language Learning, pages 29-37, Sofia, Bul- garia. Association for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF54": { |
|
"ref_id": "b54", |
|
"title": "Painless semi-supervised morphological segmentation using conditional random fields", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Oskar", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Teemu Ruokolainen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Sami", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kohonen", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Mikko", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Virpioja", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kurimo", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2014, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "2", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "84--89", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.3115/v1/E14-4017" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Teemu Ruokolainen, Oskar Kohonen, Sami Virpioja, and Mikko Kurimo. 2014. Painless semi-supervised morphological segmentation using conditional ran- dom fields. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, volume 2: Short Papers, pages 84-89, Gothenburg, Sweden. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF55": { |
|
"ref_id": "b55", |
|
"title": "A graphbased lattice dependency parser for joint morphological segmentation and syntactic analysis. Transactions of the Association for", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Wolfgang", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Seeker", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "\u00d6zlem", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "\u00c7etinoglu", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2015, |
|
"venue": "Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "3", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "359--373", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.1162/tacl_a_00144" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Wolfgang Seeker and \u00d6zlem \u00c7etinoglu. 2015. A graph- based lattice dependency parser for joint morpholog- ical segmentation and syntactic analysis. Transac- tions of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics, 3:359-373.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF56": { |
|
"ref_id": "b56", |
|
"title": "Handling unknown words in Arabic FST morphology", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Khaled", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Shaalan", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Mohammed", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Attia", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2012, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Finite State Methods and Natural Language Processing", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "20--24", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Khaled Shaalan and Mohammed Attia. 2012. Handling unknown words in Arabic FST morphology. In Pro- ceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Fi- nite State Methods and Natural Language Process- ing, pages 20-24, Donostia-San Sebasti\u00e1n. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF57": { |
|
"ref_id": "b57", |
|
"title": "Convolutional neural networks for low-resource morpheme segmentation: baseline or state-of-the-art?", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Alexey", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sorokin", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2019, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 16th", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Alexey Sorokin. 2019. Convolutional neural networks for low-resource morpheme segmentation: baseline or state-of-the-art? In Proceedings of the 16th", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF58": { |
|
"ref_id": "b58", |
|
"title": "Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology", |
|
"authors": [], |
|
"year": null, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "154--159", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology, pages 154-159.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF59": { |
|
"ref_id": "b59", |
|
"title": "Deep convolutional networks for supervised morpheme segmentation of Russian language", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Alexey", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sorokin", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Anastasia", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Kravtsova", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2018, |
|
"venue": "Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "3--10", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Alexey Sorokin and Anastasia Kravtsova. 2018. Deep convolutional networks for supervised morpheme segmentation of Russian language. In Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language, pages 3-10. Springer.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF60": { |
|
"ref_id": "b60", |
|
"title": "The composition and use of the universal morphological feature schema (unimorph schema)", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "John", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Sylak-Glassman", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2016, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "John Sylak-Glassman. 2016. The composition and use of the universal morphological feature schema (uni- morph schema). Johns Hopkins University.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF61": { |
|
"ref_id": "b61", |
|
"title": "Synthetic data augmentation for improving low-resource asr", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Bao", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Thai", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Robert", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Jimerson", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Dominic", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Arcoraci", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Emily", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Prud'hommeaux", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Raymond", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Ptucha", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2019, |
|
"venue": "2019 IEEE Western New York Image and Signal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW)", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "1--9", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Bao Thai, Robert Jimerson, Dominic Arcoraci, Emily Prud'hommeaux, and Raymond Ptucha. 2019. Syn- thetic data augmentation for improving low-resource asr. In 2019 IEEE Western New York Image and Sig- nal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW), pages 1-9. IEEE.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF62": { |
|
"ref_id": "b62", |
|
"title": "Fully convolutional ASR for less-resourced endangered languages", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Bao", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Thai", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Robert", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Jimerson", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Raymond", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Ptucha", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Emily", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Prud", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "'", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Hommeaux", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2020, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-resourced languages (SLTU) and Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages (CCURL)", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "126--130", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Bao Thai, Robert Jimerson, Raymond Ptucha, and Emily Prud'hommeaux. 2020. Fully convolutional ASR for less-resourced endangered languages. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-resourced lan- guages (SLTU) and Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages (CCURL), pages 126-130, Marseille, France. European Language Re- sources association.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF63": { |
|
"ref_id": "b63", |
|
"title": "Mexicanero de la sierra madre occidental", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Canger", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Una", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2001, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": {}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Canger Una. 2001. Mexicanero de la sierra madre oc- cidental. El Colegio de M\u00e9xico.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF64": { |
|
"ref_id": "b64", |
|
"title": "Memory-based morphological analysis", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Antal", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Van Den", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "Walter", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Bosch", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Daelemans", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 1999, |
|
"venue": "Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "285--292", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"DOI": [ |
|
"10.3115/1034678.1034726" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Antal van den Bosch and Walter Daelemans. 1999. Memory-based morphological analysis. In Proceed- ings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 285-292, Col- lege Park, Maryland, USA. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.", |
|
"links": null |
|
}, |
|
"BIBREF65": { |
|
"ref_id": "b65", |
|
"title": "Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method", |
|
"authors": [ |
|
{ |
|
"first": "D", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Matthew", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"first": "", |
|
"middle": [], |
|
"last": "Zeiler", |
|
"suffix": "" |
|
} |
|
], |
|
"year": 2012, |
|
"venue": "", |
|
"volume": "", |
|
"issue": "", |
|
"pages": "", |
|
"other_ids": { |
|
"arXiv": [ |
|
"arXiv:1212.5701" |
|
] |
|
}, |
|
"num": null, |
|
"urls": [], |
|
"raw_text": "Matthew D Zeiler. 2012. Adadelta: an adaptive learn- ing rate method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.5701.", |
|
"links": null |
|
} |
|
}, |
|
"ref_entries": { |
|
"FIGREF1": { |
|
"num": null, |
|
"type_str": "figure", |
|
"uris": null, |
|
"text": "Model testing results given different evaluation designs; error bars indicate 95% CI after bootstrapping." |
|
}, |
|
"TABREF1": { |
|
"content": "<table/>", |
|
"num": null, |
|
"type_str": "table", |
|
"html": null, |
|
"text": "Descriptive information of the Seneca language and data." |
|
}, |
|
"TABREF3": { |
|
"content": "<table><tr><td>Grammar book</td><td>Models</td><td>Accuracy</td><td>F1</td><td colspan=\"3\">Avg. Distance better than Morfessor? Selected?</td></tr><tr><td>In-domain</td><td>naive baseline</td><td>11.43</td><td>40.32</td><td>5.90</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>less naive baseline</td><td>12.35</td><td>40.77</td><td>4.01</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-domain</td><td>self-training</td><td>13.38</td><td>42.96</td><td>3.77</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>multi-task learning</td><td>14.66</td><td>42.97</td><td>3.24</td><td>Yes</td><td>\u2713</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-linguistic</td><td>multi-task learning</td><td>12.54</td><td>41.63</td><td>3.28</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>transfer learning</td><td>15.12</td><td>40.89</td><td>3.40</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>fine-tuning</td><td>15.52</td><td>41.15</td><td>3.40</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Informal sources</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>In-domain</td><td>naive baseline</td><td>10.18</td><td>44.16</td><td>4.58</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>less naive baseline</td><td>12.97</td><td>45.38</td><td>3.66</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Cross-domain</td><td>self-training</td><td>12.92</td><td>45.08</td><td>3.31</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>multi-task learning</td><td>16.59</td><td>47.79</td><td>2.97</td><td>Yes</td><td>\u2713</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-linguistic</td><td>multi-task learning</td><td>14.65</td><td>45.91</td><td>3.15</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>transfer learning</td><td>13.61</td><td>45.07</td><td>3.07</td><td>Yes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>fine-tuning</td><td>13.61</td><td>45.24</td><td>3.06</td><td/></tr></table>", |
|
"num": null, |
|
"type_str": "table", |
|
"html": null, |
|
"text": "Model training and evaluation with the development set. The value of each metric for every model was compared to those of the two baselines; boldface indicates significant differences from both baselines, derived by comparing their respective 95% CI after bootstrapping. Selected training setting for model testing is checkmarked." |
|
}, |
|
"TABREF4": { |
|
"content": "<table/>", |
|
"num": null, |
|
"type_str": "table", |
|
"html": null, |
|
"text": "Model training and evaluation with the development domain. The value of each metric for every model was compared to those of the two baselines; boldface indicates significant differences from both baselines, derived by comparing their respective 95% CI after bootstrapping. Selected training setting for model testing is checkmarked." |
|
} |
|
} |
|
} |
|
} |