| [00:01] <fta> well, looks fine to me | |
| [00:08] <asac> fta: yeah. | |
| [00:09] * asac remove --purge libnspr4-0d from chroot | |
| [00:13] <fta> jdstrand, what else is needed in the bug? | |
| [00:14] <jdstrand> fta: what's the bug number again? (backscroll has got me down...) | |
| [00:14] <fta> bug 276437 | |
| [00:14] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 276437 in seamonkey "security upgrade of seamonkey 1.1.12" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/276437 | |
| [00:15] <jdstrand> looking... | |
| [00:15] <asac> i guess the .diff.gz and .dsc | |
| [00:17] * asac off doing something else | |
| [00:18] <jdstrand> fta: yeah, I'll need the full source. the debdiff looks good (need to look at it more closely) | |
| [00:18] <fta> jdstrand, full source is already there | |
| [00:18] <jdstrand> fta: once I have the dsc and diff.gz, please just document in the bug your testing | |
| [00:19] <jdstrand> fta: I'm sorry, I meant full source package | |
| [00:21] <jdstrand> fta: once I have the complete source package, and the testing is documented, I'll upload | |
| [00:22] <fta> jdstrand, hm, i've made the intrepid one complete (-sa), and the hardy one as -sd, so intrepid must be uploaded first | |
| [00:22] <fta> unless you prefer the opposite | |
| [00:23] <jdstrand> fta: well, I do for complicated reasons dealing with the security buildd... | |
| [00:23] <jdstrand> fta: sorry about that | |
| [00:23] <jdstrand> fta: currently, we have a different buildd for security | |
| [00:24] <jdstrand> fta: and that buildd doesn't have intrepid yet, cause it's not released | |
| [00:24] <fta> so, both could include the orig.tar.gz ? | |
| [00:24] <jdstrand> fta: so I need to build hardy in the security buildd, push it to LP, then I should be able to build intrepid | |
| [00:24] <asac> jdstrand: intrepid? | |
| [00:24] <asac> why do you need to care for intrepid at all? | |
| [00:24] <asac> ;) | |
| [00:25] <jdstrand> asac: well, I don't, if you or someone else uploads it | |
| [00:25] <fta> i thought i would push to intrepid myself | |
| [00:25] <jdstrand> that's cool-- I'll need -sa for hardy though | |
| [00:25] <asac> jdstrand: yeah. fta will upload that | |
| [00:31] <asac> ppa publishing takes ages today :/ | |
| [00:31] <fta> yep, often longer than the build | |
| [00:32] <asac> in this case unfortunate ... everything is there except the binary-all packages :) | |
| [00:32] <asac> which come from i386 | |
| [00:32] <asac> and are not yet published | |
| [00:32] <fta> take it from the lp +archive page | |
| [00:32] <asac> fta: thats the problem ;) | |
| [00:32] <asac> fta: as soon as the .deb is there it will be quite soon in the archive index | |
| [00:32] <asac> but its not there yet :( | |
| [00:33] <fta> oh, i thought librarian had it immediately | |
| [00:33] <asac> i thought so too. most likely that has changed | |
| [00:34] <asac> amd64 bits took 15 minutes to show up after build | |
| [00:35] <asac> anyone interested in fixing ifupdown to honour a global nm setting that would make ifupdown stop from auto upping interfaces? | |
| [00:35] <asac> i hate that source ;) | |
| [00:35] <asac> its one file ... and its written in tex ;) | |
| [00:36] <asac> last time i touched it i thought it was fun ... but now i think that one time is enough for a lifetime :/ | |
| [00:36] <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/ifupdown.nw ;) | |
| [00:37] <fta> i should stop caring about that : http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/karma.png it's too volatile | |
| [00:37] <asac> thats what i am saying ;) | |
| [00:37] <asac> but still nice experiment to keep running ;) | |
| [00:38] <asac> maybe also comparison of bug, bzr and whatever ;) | |
| [00:38] <fta> i'd be curious to see yours | |
| [00:39] <asac> i'd rather not ... when i do the whole night bug triaging and then see my karma not moving at all i would certainly get depressed :-P | |
| [00:39] <fta> i am | |
| [00:40] <asac> yeah. simple cure: dont look at it ;) | |
| [00:40] <asac> fta: do you have the script? | |
| [00:40] <asac> i can add that to my crontab ... or even you can run it on your own i guess :-D | |
| [00:41] <asac> so ... anyone has a C snippet to parse keyfile formats? e.g. | |
| [00:41] <asac> [group] | |
| [00:41] <asac> key1=value | |
| [00:41] <asac> key2=value2 | |
| [00:42] <fta> and do what with it? | |
| [00:42] <asac> fta: i need to add a code snippet to http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/ifupdown.nw that parses /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf | |
| [00:43] <asac> and stops auto upping interfaces when there is | |
| [00:43] <asac> [ifupdown] | |
| [00:43] <asac> managed=true | |
| [00:43] <asac> ;) | |
| [00:43] <pwnguin> asac: iniparser? | |
| [00:43] <asac> pwnguin: yeah. but i guess i cannot use glib :) | |
| [00:44] <pwnguin> ? | |
| [00:44] <pwnguin> oh, gnome probably doesn't have such a thing in their libs | |
| [00:44] <asac> pwnguin: libglib has | |
| [00:44] <asac> pwnguin: but i cannot use it | |
| [00:44] <pwnguin> http://ndevilla.free.fr/iniparser/ | |
| [00:44] <asac> people would kill me to pull in libglib dependency on ifupdown | |
| [00:45] <pwnguin> heh | |
| [00:45] <fta> jdstrand, all the files are in the bug now | |
| [00:45] <asac> pwnguin: is that packaged? | |
| [00:45] <pwnguin> i think people would kill you for changing ifupdown file syntax just the same | |
| [00:45] <asac> hehe yeah. thats not my plan - i hope | |
| [00:46] <pwnguin> in gentoo | |
| [00:47] <asac> quite a big thing for this tiny ifupdow tex thing | |
| [00:48] <asac> pwnguin: unfortunate that the tarball doesnt have a license info | |
| [00:48] <pwnguin> the bigger challenge is that it's probably not secure | |
| [00:49] <pwnguin> asac: the website suggests MIT license | |
| [00:49] <asac> pwnguin: yeah websites can tell a lot of things ;) | |
| [00:49] <asac> tarballs too of course ;) | |
| [00:50] <pwnguin> but the author seems to be alive at least | |
| [00:50] <pwnguin> so you could mail him and ask for a better clarification | |
| [00:50] <pwnguin> wait | |
| [00:50] <pwnguin> what's LICENSE | |
| [00:51] <asac> he? | |
| [00:51] <pwnguin> in the tarball | |
| [00:51] <asac> hehe | |
| [00:51] <asac> my fault i guess | |
| [00:52] <asac> i also found libini now ;) | |
| [00:53] <asac> pwnguin: why isnt iniparser secure? | |
| [00:53] <pwnguin> good question; i was thinking that sort of thing should be fuzzed | |
| [00:53] <pwnguin> but i guess if it's a parser, those are normally built to reject invalid input | |
| [00:53] <asac> pwnguin: no | |
| [00:54] <asac> pwnguin: its only about a single key in one config file ;) | |
| [00:54] <asac> pwnguin: yeah. and that file is only writable by root usually | |
| [00:55] <fta> asac, only a few lines of C are needed for that | |
| [00:56] <pwnguin> or perhaps a regex ;) | |
| [00:57] <fta> in perl, it's piece of cake | |
| [00:57] <pwnguin> in fact, i think ini is fairly regular; just sections and key pairs | |
| [00:59] <asac> true. | |
| [00:59] <asac> there are also comments though | |
| [00:59] <pwnguin> touche | |
| [00:59] <asac> not sure how the comment delimiter can be escaped | |
| [00:59] <pwnguin> i dont think it can | |
| [01:00] <asac> i think even if multiline values are possible, we probably dont need this for our use case | |
| [01:00] <pwnguin> new line usually terminates comments | |
| [01:00] <fta> asac, could I push sm to intrepid, or should i wait for someone to confirm the bug ? (motu-something?) | |
| [01:00] <asac> pwnguin: no .. i mean if you want a value with a ; in it ;) | |
| [01:00] <asac> e.g. | |
| [01:00] <asac> value=my;thing | |
| [01:01] <asac> fta: i doubt that anyone will complain ;) ... but you never know :-P | |
| [01:01] <pwnguin> well, you've got the source code to a couple implementations ;) | |
| [01:01] <asac> pwnguin: yeah | |
| [01:02] <asac> I'll take the MIT one i think ;) | |
| [01:02] <asac> at least its pure C | |
| [01:02] <fta> asac, so? | |
| [01:04] <asac> fta: upload :) | |
| [01:05] <asac> fta: it will be stuck in upload queue until beta is released (or in case a release manager clears the queue) | |
| [01:05] <asac> but thats ok | |
| [01:05] <asac> in case RMs dont have time it will automatically go in after beta | |
| [01:06] <fta> ok | |
| [01:06] <asac> you can probably also kindly ask RMs after 24 hours or so | |
| [01:29] <fta> Bug 246820 | |
| [01:29] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 246820 in prism "Google Gears does not install on Prism" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/246820 | |
| [01:31] <fta> [ubuntu/intrepid] seamonkey 1.1.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (Waiting for approval) | |
| [10:57] <fta2> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18102344/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-hppa.seamonkey_1.1.12%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | |
| [11:17] <asac> fta2: only hppa? | |
| [11:17] <asac> thats fine then | |
| [11:17] <asac> most likely imagemagick didnt built or is outdated | |
| [11:17] <asac> you could retry in 24 hours (e.g. use launchpad "retry" button) | |
| [11:34] <Kamping_Kaiser> hi all | |
| [11:34] <asac> hi Kamping_Kaiser | |
| [11:35] <Kamping_Kaiser> asac, evening | |
| [11:56] <armin76> asac: thats okay? die :P | |
| [12:03] <asac> why do you have that much sympathy for hppa? | |
| [12:06] <Kamping_Kaiser> hppa? isnt that just an alpha wannabe? | |
| [12:06] <armin76> i have sympathy for all arches :P | |
| [12:28] <fta2> asac, yep, only hppa | |
| [12:29] <fta2> asac, how come ff/tb are not listed in the CVE pages on lp ? | |
| [12:29] <fta2> asac, eg: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2008-4060 | |
| [12:35] <fta2> asac, you said you fixed ff3.0 yesterday, is it in yet? | |
| [12:35] <fta2> doesn't seems to be | |
| [12:36] <fta2> -s | |
| [12:53] <asac> fta2: huh? | |
| [12:53] <asac> fta2: firefox and thunderbird usually dominate the USN page ;) | |
| [12:53] <asac> fta2: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn | |
| [12:54] <fta2> maybe but lp tracks CVEs and ff/tb are not listed, that's too bad | |
| [12:54] <asac> fta2: not sure if the security team uses that feature seriously | |
| [12:54] <asac> jdstrand: ^^ ? | |
| [12:58] <fta2> Bug 154749 | |
| [12:58] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 154749 in seamonkey "seamonkey installer bin will not oper in ubuntu desktop ver 7.10" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/154749 | |
| [13:01] <fta2> doesn't seem to be the ubuntu package | |
| [13:11] <fta2> asac, where is your fix from yesterday? the ff-3.0 missing symlink | |
| [13:12] <asac> fta2: isnt that in .head? | |
| [13:13] <asac> *sigh* | |
| [13:13] <asac> will do that after lunch | |
| [13:13] <asac> fta2: feel free to fix it | |
| [13:13] <asac> if you cant wait ;) | |
| [13:14] <asac> or wait a sec ;) | |
| [13:14] <fta2> i wanted to do it yesterday, you said in #u-desktop that you already did it | |
| [13:15] <asac> i know what i said | |
| [13:15] <asac> its on my laptop ;) ... which is in my bag | |
| [13:20] <fta2> should i wait? or what? | |
| [13:21] <asac> fta2: no ... go ahead ... its such a minimal change that i dont feel any loss :) | |
| [13:26] <fta2> did you do something smart for the 3.1 merge? | |
| [13:26] <fta2> or just a symlink | |
| [13:29] <asac> fta2: 3.1 merge? | |
| [13:29] <asac> fta2: we have the _VER variable. i used that | |
| [13:30] <asac> i think i added | |
| [13:31] <fta2> nm, i'll manage | |
| [13:32] <asac> k | |
| [13:32] <asac> fta2: can you fix that in .head pleaes? | |
| [13:33] <fta2> sure | |
| [13:33] <asac> 3.0.head i mean | |
| [13:33] <asac> in theory there should be no difference in the code | |
| [13:33] <asac> we have the _META ifdef for that | |
| [13:39] <gnomefreak> wasnt 3.0.3 released a while ago? i just got email about release email date was 9/26/08 i thought we had it a while before than | |
| [13:43] <asac> gnomefreak: we released a bit early yeah. | |
| [13:43] <asac> (wasnt that a great idea ;)) | |
| [13:43] <gnomefreak> i liked it ;) | |
| [13:44] <jdstrand> fta, asac: the CVE database in LP leaves a lot to be desired-- it is in no way surprising that ff and tb aren't listed | |
| [13:44] <jdstrand> basically, LP imports the CVEs | |
| [13:44] <jdstrand> then you either have to file a bug, then 'Link to CVE' in the bug | |
| [13:45] <jdstrand> if a comment has CVE-XXXX-YYYY in it, then LP will do the 'Link to CVE' step for you | |
| [13:45] <jdstrand> (regardless of if you want it to or not) | |
| [13:46] <asac> jdstrand: ok ... so a CVE: XXXX-xxx changelog parsing feature is missing ;) | |
| [13:46] <fta2> no, it worked for sm | |
| [13:46] <jdstrand> asac: I think it'll see it when things are Fix Released and posted in the bug | |
| [13:47] <jdstrand> (cause it shows up as a comment) | |
| [13:47] <asac> james_w: do we have hardy backport packages for current bzr and bzr-builddeb? | |
| [13:47] <fta2> just plain CVE-XXXX-YYYY, not CVE-XXXX-YYYY..ZZZZ | |
| [13:47] <jdstrand> fta: correct | |
| [13:47] <james_w> asac: no, not yet | |
| [13:47] <asac> james_w: my auto builder doesnt like the --result-dir option hardy chroot :( | |
| [13:48] <james_w> asac: I'll bump it up my todo list | |
| [13:48] <jdstrand> really, the usefulness of the CVE functionality is that *if* a CVE happens to be linked to the bug, you can click and get to the CVE description | |
| [13:49] <jdstrand> we don't try to keep it in sync cause the API just isn't there yet. we use our own ubuntu-cve-tracker | |
| [13:49] <asac> thanks for clarifying | |
| [13:49] <jdstrand> np | |
| [13:49] <asac> james_w: latest builddeb wont work with hardy bzr? | |
| [13:50] <asac> james_w: or could i just checkout builddeb in .bazaar/plugins or something? | |
| [13:50] <james_w> asac: what's the error? | |
| [13:50] <james_w> or is it the depends? | |
| [13:50] <asac> james_w: i havent tried ... i only saw that --result-dir isnt known | |
| [13:50] <asac> in default hardy | |
| [13:51] <james_w> that's nothing to do with the bzr version, the name of the option just changed | |
| [13:51] <james_w> at your request I believe | |
| [13:51] <james_w> --result will work in both | |
| [13:54] <fta2> --result doesn't work for me, i want the results in build-area as before, not above, but i get raise Error, "`%s` and `%s` are the same file" % (src, dst) | |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | |
| [14:08] <asac> james_w: result works? | |
| [14:08] <asac> hmm | |
| [14:08] <james_w> fta2: please upgrade to 2.0.1 | |
| [14:09] <asac> ok giving that a spin | |
| [14:09] <asac> lets see ;) | |
| [14:10] <gnomefreak> 2.0.1 is in intrepid unless he missed updates he should be running it | |
| [14:14] <fta2> i'm using 2.0.1 | |
| [14:16] <james_w> fta: file a bug with the backtrace then please | |
| [14:16] <james_w> if there isn't a backtrace then add -Derror to the command line and run it again | |
| [14:28] <asac> fta2: we also need a versioned simlink from _NAME_OTHER | |
| [14:28] <asac> fta2: abrowser-3.0 wont work now i think | |
| [14:29] <fta2> james_w, that's what i get: http://paste.ubuntu.com/52846/ | |
| [14:30] <fta2> asac, i wanted to ask you if i can move all the abrowser stuff to the abrowser branding deb | |
| [14:31] <asac> fta2: i think the links are fine in the -common package (which currently i firefox-3.0) | |
| [14:31] <asac> fta2: in that way things that use the abrowser commands will still work with firefox and vv. | |
| [14:32] <fta2> well, in /usr/bin, i don't like to add stuff that are not needed, like /usr/bin/abrowser* for people using plain ff3 | |
| [14:33] <asac> fta2: its a matter of compatibility. those scripts dont hurt | |
| [14:34] <asac> fta2: same argument would be true for abrowser. whipping firefox links everywhere but abrowser links not will make "abrowser" more a second class citizen then it already is | |
| [14:38] <asac> fta2: imo we should review how the branding split is packaged for jaunty | |
| [14:41] <fta2> it's now clean for the desktop file, and for icons. i just don't like all those links in usr/bin and usr/lib | |
| [14:42] <fta2> i don't expect that many users to switch to abrowser anyway, so 2nd class citizen is more than probable. | |
| [14:42] <asac> fta2: well. its a political thing | |
| [14:42] <asac> both need to be similar and all those links dont really hurt | |
| [14:42] <asac> they only serve for compatibility | |
| [14:42] <asac> users will only see the .desktop files | |
| [14:47] <fta2> http://paste.ubuntu.com/52853/ | |
| [14:48] <fta2> no idea how representative it is | |
| [14:49] <asac> fta2: its not ... ffox is installed by default ;) | |
| [14:49] <thunderstruck> 2nd class my ass i use it and like it ;) | |
| [14:49] <asac> but as i said. its not a matter of popularity. | |
| [14:50] <asac> the bidirectional links need to be in the -common package | |
| [14:50] <thunderstruck> asac: and you are right abrowser-3.0 doesnt work | |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | |
| [14:51] <fta2> we have 125 times more people using the ff branding just in intrepid | |
| [14:52] <gnomefreak> ?? | |
| [14:52] <asac> that doesnt change the fact that both packages should be 100% equivalent | |
| [14:52] <asac> thats only achieved if abrowser links exist everywhere | |
| [14:52] * gnomefreak has no way of finding that percentage out | |
| [14:53] <gnomefreak> awesome-browser?? | |
| [14:53] <gnomefreak> is that abrowser? | |
| [14:53] <fta2> 6941 firefox-3.0-branding 4263 1255 0 3006 2 (Unknown) | |
| [14:53] <fta2> 33650 abrowser-3.0-branding 34 9 0 25 0 (Unknown) | |
| [14:53] <fta2> 4263/34 | |
| [14:53] <fta2> ~125 | |
| [14:53] <gnomefreak> where did you find that? | |
| [14:53] <fta2> popcon | |
| [14:54] <gnomefreak> oh | |
| [14:54] <asac> ok ... lunch and then coding NM | |
| [14:54] <gnomefreak> fta2: abrowser still gives you firefox-3.0 | |
| [14:54] <fta2> 26018 firefox-3.1-branding 118 36 0 82 0 (Unknown) | |
| [14:54] <fta2> 44115 abrowser-3.1-branding 7 1 0 6 0 (Unknown) | |
| [14:54] <fta2> 22665 firefox-3.1 197 32 45 120 0 (Unknown) | |
| [15:10] <gnomefreak> asac: care to tell the people on bug 87101 to back off. we fix it one way it pisses others off, cant win them all | |
| [15:10] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 87101 in thunderbird "when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87101 | |
| [15:17] <thunderstruck> this is starting to piss me off | |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | |
| [15:17] <james_w> fta2: thanks, should be fixed in the next upload | |
| [15:29] <gnomefreak> !info libflashsupport intrepid | |
| [15:29] <ubottu> libflashsupport (source: libflashsupport): Support library for sound output of Flash 9+ with PulseAudio. In component universe, is extra. Version 1.9-0ubuntu2 (intrepid), package size 8 kB, installed size 64 kB | |
| [15:29] <gnomefreak> asac: do you plan pon removing libflashsupport from archives anymore? | |
| [15:31] <gnomefreak> s/pon/on | |
| [15:33] <asac> gnomefreak: i am waiting for feedback from ltsp on whether they still need that | |
| [15:34] <gnomefreak> k | |
| [15:34] <gnomefreak> people are making frigging wiki pages on how to fix the issue and i have strong feeling we are gonna get comments that that isnt the fix (because people dont know any better | |
| [15:35] <gnomefreak> )* | |
| [15:38] <gnomefreak> asac: i told guy on bug 255297 i would ping you | |
| [15:38] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 255297 in xulrunner-1.9 "please include debian patch to enable old certificates UI" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/255297 | |
| [15:41] <gnomefreak> !info flashplugin-nonfree hardy-backports | |
| [15:41] <ubottu> flashplugin-nonfree (source: flashplugin-nonfree): Adobe Flash Player plugin installer. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 10.0.1.218+10.0.0.525ubuntu1~hardy1+really9.0.124.0ubuntu2 (hardy-backports), package size 18 kB, installed size 164 kB (Only available for i386 amd64 lpia) | |
| [15:41] <asac> gnomefreak: when? | |
| [15:42] <asac> gnomefreak: i mean i am always in chpe's epiphany channel ;) | |
| [15:42] <asac> he could easily ping me there :) | |
| [15:42] <gnomefreak> i dont really know him but i said it on bug. my mail might have not gotten there yet | |
| [15:43] <asac> ah ok | |
| [15:55] <thunderstruck> asac: did you get my last post about tbird notification? | |
| [15:56] <asac> huh? | |
| [15:56] <asac> i dont think so | |
| [15:56] <asac> at least not here | |
| [16:01] <thunders1ruck> fuck this | |
| [16:02] <thunders1ruck> asac: in case you missed it | |
| [16:02] <thunders1ruck> .:10:50:35:. < gnomefreak > do we have notification for tbird restart after update? if not we should really think about this | |
| [16:04] <asac> thunders1ruck: yeah we dont have it yet | |
| [16:05] <thunders1ruck> k | |
| [16:05] <asac> but makes sense i agree | |
| === thunders1ruck is now known as gnomefreak | |
| [16:26] <thunderstruck> asac: do we have master bug on the the exec: 118: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/..... people are trying it with all different browser links. like sendible-browser | |
| [16:27] <thunderstruck> x-www-browser gets a different error | |
| [16:38] <asac> thunderstruck: thanks | |
| [16:38] <asac> thunderstruck: we should make a bug out of that | |
| [16:42] <thunderstruck> i opened the one i filed and marked all as dup and explained in bug what links fail | |
| [16:42] <thunderstruck> asac: bug 273907 | |
| [16:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 273907 in firefox-3.0 "abrowser does not start: :$pkglibdir/abrowser link missing" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/273907 | |
| [16:43] <thunderstruck> updated description | |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | |
| [16:44] <gnomefreak> ok i really have to work on connection now. its getting old fast | |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | |
| [17:05] <asac> jcastro: did you reping blizzard? | |
| [17:06] <jcastro> asac: not yet, I will do so today | |
| [17:06] <jcastro> sorry I've been running around like a chicken with my head cut off. | |
| [17:08] <asac> jcastro: too points. ask him if he thinks that anyone would come. most likely those will come during UDS and not fosscamp (as its business day for them), right? | |
| [17:08] <asac> jcastro: i am trying to sort out if i need to be at fosscamp :) | |
| [17:11] <[reed]> asac: get mconnor to come? :) | |
| [17:19] <asac> [reed]: i asked him and he said he planned to be in MV around that time and would then consider to come | |
| [17:20] <[reed]> cool | |
| [18:02] <bfiller> asac: where can I find a version of firefox-3.0 with debug symbols? | |
| [18:03] <asac> bfiller: you can find debug symbols | |
| [18:03] <asac> bfiller: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#Crashes | |
| [18:03] <asac> adapt apt lines for intrepid accordingly | |
| [18:03] <bfiller> asac: thanks | |
| [18:05] <asac> bfiller: if you need a real debug build you need to build on your own | |
| [18:05] <asac> (e.g. with debug output and without optimization) | |
| [18:12] <asac> so now i became a ~ubuntu-mir team member :/ | |
| [18:56] <asac> james_w: http://paste.ubuntu.com/52925/ | |
| [18:56] <asac> james_w: thats the error i referred to the other day | |
| [18:57] <asac> building -sa complains about binary changes missing sometimes | |
| [20:27] <fta> asac, i tried to make head or tail from the gnash package, it's really awful | |
| [20:52] <fta> asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=935231 | |
| [21:12] <asac> fta: he? | |
| [21:12] <asac> i updated gnash.ubuntu.head today | |
| [21:12] <asac> should work | |
| [21:13] <fta> nm, it was a few days ago, i gave up and updated nf-flash instead :( | |
| [21:58] <fta> mozilla bug Bug 368428 | |
| [21:58] <ubottu> Error: Launchpad bug 368428 could not be found | |
| [21:58] <fta> mozilla bug 368428 | |
| [21:58] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 368428 in Networking: JAR "XUL FastLoad cache corruption when application running while upgrading" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368428 | |
| === `6og is now known as Kamping_Kaiser | |