File size: 22,102 Bytes
4aa5fce |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 |
[00:01] <fta> well, looks fine to me [00:08] <asac> fta: yeah. [00:09] * asac remove --purge libnspr4-0d from chroot [00:13] <fta> jdstrand, what else is needed in the bug? [00:14] <jdstrand> fta: what's the bug number again? (backscroll has got me down...) [00:14] <fta> bug 276437 [00:14] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 276437 in seamonkey "security upgrade of seamonkey 1.1.12" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/276437 [00:15] <jdstrand> looking... [00:15] <asac> i guess the .diff.gz and .dsc [00:17] * asac off doing something else [00:18] <jdstrand> fta: yeah, I'll need the full source. the debdiff looks good (need to look at it more closely) [00:18] <fta> jdstrand, full source is already there [00:18] <jdstrand> fta: once I have the dsc and diff.gz, please just document in the bug your testing [00:19] <jdstrand> fta: I'm sorry, I meant full source package [00:21] <jdstrand> fta: once I have the complete source package, and the testing is documented, I'll upload [00:22] <fta> jdstrand, hm, i've made the intrepid one complete (-sa), and the hardy one as -sd, so intrepid must be uploaded first [00:22] <fta> unless you prefer the opposite [00:23] <jdstrand> fta: well, I do for complicated reasons dealing with the security buildd... [00:23] <jdstrand> fta: sorry about that [00:23] <jdstrand> fta: currently, we have a different buildd for security [00:24] <jdstrand> fta: and that buildd doesn't have intrepid yet, cause it's not released [00:24] <fta> so, both could include the orig.tar.gz ? [00:24] <jdstrand> fta: so I need to build hardy in the security buildd, push it to LP, then I should be able to build intrepid [00:24] <asac> jdstrand: intrepid? [00:24] <asac> why do you need to care for intrepid at all? [00:24] <asac> ;) [00:25] <jdstrand> asac: well, I don't, if you or someone else uploads it [00:25] <fta> i thought i would push to intrepid myself [00:25] <jdstrand> that's cool-- I'll need -sa for hardy though [00:25] <asac> jdstrand: yeah. fta will upload that [00:31] <asac> ppa publishing takes ages today :/ [00:31] <fta> yep, often longer than the build [00:32] <asac> in this case unfortunate ... everything is there except the binary-all packages :) [00:32] <asac> which come from i386 [00:32] <asac> and are not yet published [00:32] <fta> take it from the lp +archive page [00:32] <asac> fta: thats the problem ;) [00:32] <asac> fta: as soon as the .deb is there it will be quite soon in the archive index [00:32] <asac> but its not there yet :( [00:33] <fta> oh, i thought librarian had it immediately [00:33] <asac> i thought so too. most likely that has changed [00:34] <asac> amd64 bits took 15 minutes to show up after build [00:35] <asac> anyone interested in fixing ifupdown to honour a global nm setting that would make ifupdown stop from auto upping interfaces? [00:35] <asac> i hate that source ;) [00:35] <asac> its one file ... and its written in tex ;) [00:36] <asac> last time i touched it i thought it was fun ... but now i think that one time is enough for a lifetime :/ [00:36] <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/ifupdown.nw ;) [00:37] <fta> i should stop caring about that : http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/karma.png it's too volatile [00:37] <asac> thats what i am saying ;) [00:37] <asac> but still nice experiment to keep running ;) [00:38] <asac> maybe also comparison of bug, bzr and whatever ;) [00:38] <fta> i'd be curious to see yours [00:39] <asac> i'd rather not ... when i do the whole night bug triaging and then see my karma not moving at all i would certainly get depressed :-P [00:39] <fta> i am [00:40] <asac> yeah. simple cure: dont look at it ;) [00:40] <asac> fta: do you have the script? [00:40] <asac> i can add that to my crontab ... or even you can run it on your own i guess :-D [00:41] <asac> so ... anyone has a C snippet to parse keyfile formats? e.g. [00:41] <asac> [group] [00:41] <asac> key1=value [00:41] <asac> key2=value2 [00:42] <fta> and do what with it? [00:42] <asac> fta: i need to add a code snippet to http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/ifupdown.nw that parses /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf [00:43] <asac> and stops auto upping interfaces when there is [00:43] <asac> [ifupdown] [00:43] <asac> managed=true [00:43] <asac> ;) [00:43] <pwnguin> asac: iniparser? [00:43] <asac> pwnguin: yeah. but i guess i cannot use glib :) [00:44] <pwnguin> ? [00:44] <pwnguin> oh, gnome probably doesn't have such a thing in their libs [00:44] <asac> pwnguin: libglib has [00:44] <asac> pwnguin: but i cannot use it [00:44] <pwnguin> http://ndevilla.free.fr/iniparser/ [00:44] <asac> people would kill me to pull in libglib dependency on ifupdown [00:45] <pwnguin> heh [00:45] <fta> jdstrand, all the files are in the bug now [00:45] <asac> pwnguin: is that packaged? [00:45] <pwnguin> i think people would kill you for changing ifupdown file syntax just the same [00:45] <asac> hehe yeah. thats not my plan - i hope [00:46] <pwnguin> in gentoo [00:47] <asac> quite a big thing for this tiny ifupdow tex thing [00:48] <asac> pwnguin: unfortunate that the tarball doesnt have a license info [00:48] <pwnguin> the bigger challenge is that it's probably not secure [00:49] <pwnguin> asac: the website suggests MIT license [00:49] <asac> pwnguin: yeah websites can tell a lot of things ;) [00:49] <asac> tarballs too of course ;) [00:50] <pwnguin> but the author seems to be alive at least [00:50] <pwnguin> so you could mail him and ask for a better clarification [00:50] <pwnguin> wait [00:50] <pwnguin> what's LICENSE [00:51] <asac> he? [00:51] <pwnguin> in the tarball [00:51] <asac> hehe [00:51] <asac> my fault i guess [00:52] <asac> i also found libini now ;) [00:53] <asac> pwnguin: why isnt iniparser secure? [00:53] <pwnguin> good question; i was thinking that sort of thing should be fuzzed [00:53] <pwnguin> but i guess if it's a parser, those are normally built to reject invalid input [00:53] <asac> pwnguin: no [00:54] <asac> pwnguin: its only about a single key in one config file ;) [00:54] <asac> pwnguin: yeah. and that file is only writable by root usually [00:55] <fta> asac, only a few lines of C are needed for that [00:56] <pwnguin> or perhaps a regex ;) [00:57] <fta> in perl, it's piece of cake [00:57] <pwnguin> in fact, i think ini is fairly regular; just sections and key pairs [00:59] <asac> true. [00:59] <asac> there are also comments though [00:59] <pwnguin> touche [00:59] <asac> not sure how the comment delimiter can be escaped [00:59] <pwnguin> i dont think it can [01:00] <asac> i think even if multiline values are possible, we probably dont need this for our use case [01:00] <pwnguin> new line usually terminates comments [01:00] <fta> asac, could I push sm to intrepid, or should i wait for someone to confirm the bug ? (motu-something?) [01:00] <asac> pwnguin: no .. i mean if you want a value with a ; in it ;) [01:00] <asac> e.g. [01:00] <asac> value=my;thing [01:01] <asac> fta: i doubt that anyone will complain ;) ... but you never know :-P [01:01] <pwnguin> well, you've got the source code to a couple implementations ;) [01:01] <asac> pwnguin: yeah [01:02] <asac> I'll take the MIT one i think ;) [01:02] <asac> at least its pure C [01:02] <fta> asac, so? [01:04] <asac> fta: upload :) [01:05] <asac> fta: it will be stuck in upload queue until beta is released (or in case a release manager clears the queue) [01:05] <asac> but thats ok [01:05] <asac> in case RMs dont have time it will automatically go in after beta [01:06] <fta> ok [01:06] <asac> you can probably also kindly ask RMs after 24 hours or so [01:29] <fta> Bug 246820 [01:29] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 246820 in prism "Google Gears does not install on Prism" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/246820 [01:31] <fta> [ubuntu/intrepid] seamonkey 1.1.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (Waiting for approval) [10:57] <fta2> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18102344/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-hppa.seamonkey_1.1.12%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [11:17] <asac> fta2: only hppa? [11:17] <asac> thats fine then [11:17] <asac> most likely imagemagick didnt built or is outdated [11:17] <asac> you could retry in 24 hours (e.g. use launchpad "retry" button) [11:34] <Kamping_Kaiser> hi all [11:34] <asac> hi Kamping_Kaiser [11:35] <Kamping_Kaiser> asac, evening [11:56] <armin76> asac: thats okay? die :P [12:03] <asac> why do you have that much sympathy for hppa? [12:06] <Kamping_Kaiser> hppa? isnt that just an alpha wannabe? [12:06] <armin76> i have sympathy for all arches :P [12:28] <fta2> asac, yep, only hppa [12:29] <fta2> asac, how come ff/tb are not listed in the CVE pages on lp ? [12:29] <fta2> asac, eg: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2008-4060 [12:35] <fta2> asac, you said you fixed ff3.0 yesterday, is it in yet? [12:35] <fta2> doesn't seems to be [12:36] <fta2> -s [12:53] <asac> fta2: huh? [12:53] <asac> fta2: firefox and thunderbird usually dominate the USN page ;) [12:53] <asac> fta2: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn [12:54] <fta2> maybe but lp tracks CVEs and ff/tb are not listed, that's too bad [12:54] <asac> fta2: not sure if the security team uses that feature seriously [12:54] <asac> jdstrand: ^^ ? [12:58] <fta2> Bug 154749 [12:58] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 154749 in seamonkey "seamonkey installer bin will not oper in ubuntu desktop ver 7.10" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/154749 [13:01] <fta2> doesn't seem to be the ubuntu package [13:11] <fta2> asac, where is your fix from yesterday? the ff-3.0 missing symlink [13:12] <asac> fta2: isnt that in .head? [13:13] <asac> *sigh* [13:13] <asac> will do that after lunch [13:13] <asac> fta2: feel free to fix it [13:13] <asac> if you cant wait ;) [13:14] <asac> or wait a sec ;) [13:14] <fta2> i wanted to do it yesterday, you said in #u-desktop that you already did it [13:15] <asac> i know what i said [13:15] <asac> its on my laptop ;) ... which is in my bag [13:20] <fta2> should i wait? or what? [13:21] <asac> fta2: no ... go ahead ... its such a minimal change that i dont feel any loss :) [13:26] <fta2> did you do something smart for the 3.1 merge? [13:26] <fta2> or just a symlink [13:29] <asac> fta2: 3.1 merge? [13:29] <asac> fta2: we have the _VER variable. i used that [13:30] <asac> i think i added [13:31] <fta2> nm, i'll manage [13:32] <asac> k [13:32] <asac> fta2: can you fix that in .head pleaes? [13:33] <fta2> sure [13:33] <asac> 3.0.head i mean [13:33] <asac> in theory there should be no difference in the code [13:33] <asac> we have the _META ifdef for that [13:39] <gnomefreak> wasnt 3.0.3 released a while ago? i just got email about release email date was 9/26/08 i thought we had it a while before than [13:43] <asac> gnomefreak: we released a bit early yeah. [13:43] <asac> (wasnt that a great idea ;)) [13:43] <gnomefreak> i liked it ;) [13:44] <jdstrand> fta, asac: the CVE database in LP leaves a lot to be desired-- it is in no way surprising that ff and tb aren't listed [13:44] <jdstrand> basically, LP imports the CVEs [13:44] <jdstrand> then you either have to file a bug, then 'Link to CVE' in the bug [13:45] <jdstrand> if a comment has CVE-XXXX-YYYY in it, then LP will do the 'Link to CVE' step for you [13:45] <jdstrand> (regardless of if you want it to or not) [13:46] <asac> jdstrand: ok ... so a CVE: XXXX-xxx changelog parsing feature is missing ;) [13:46] <fta2> no, it worked for sm [13:46] <jdstrand> asac: I think it'll see it when things are Fix Released and posted in the bug [13:47] <jdstrand> (cause it shows up as a comment) [13:47] <asac> james_w: do we have hardy backport packages for current bzr and bzr-builddeb? [13:47] <fta2> just plain CVE-XXXX-YYYY, not CVE-XXXX-YYYY..ZZZZ [13:47] <jdstrand> fta: correct [13:47] <james_w> asac: no, not yet [13:47] <asac> james_w: my auto builder doesnt like the --result-dir option hardy chroot :( [13:48] <james_w> asac: I'll bump it up my todo list [13:48] <jdstrand> really, the usefulness of the CVE functionality is that *if* a CVE happens to be linked to the bug, you can click and get to the CVE description [13:49] <jdstrand> we don't try to keep it in sync cause the API just isn't there yet. we use our own ubuntu-cve-tracker [13:49] <asac> thanks for clarifying [13:49] <jdstrand> np [13:49] <asac> james_w: latest builddeb wont work with hardy bzr? [13:50] <asac> james_w: or could i just checkout builddeb in .bazaar/plugins or something? [13:50] <james_w> asac: what's the error? [13:50] <james_w> or is it the depends? [13:50] <asac> james_w: i havent tried ... i only saw that --result-dir isnt known [13:50] <asac> in default hardy [13:51] <james_w> that's nothing to do with the bzr version, the name of the option just changed [13:51] <james_w> at your request I believe [13:51] <james_w> --result will work in both [13:54] <fta2> --result doesn't work for me, i want the results in build-area as before, not above, but i get raise Error, "`%s` and `%s` are the same file" % (src, dst) === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [14:08] <asac> james_w: result works? [14:08] <asac> hmm [14:08] <james_w> fta2: please upgrade to 2.0.1 [14:09] <asac> ok giving that a spin [14:09] <asac> lets see ;) [14:10] <gnomefreak> 2.0.1 is in intrepid unless he missed updates he should be running it [14:14] <fta2> i'm using 2.0.1 [14:16] <james_w> fta: file a bug with the backtrace then please [14:16] <james_w> if there isn't a backtrace then add -Derror to the command line and run it again [14:28] <asac> fta2: we also need a versioned simlink from _NAME_OTHER [14:28] <asac> fta2: abrowser-3.0 wont work now i think [14:29] <fta2> james_w, that's what i get: http://paste.ubuntu.com/52846/ [14:30] <fta2> asac, i wanted to ask you if i can move all the abrowser stuff to the abrowser branding deb [14:31] <asac> fta2: i think the links are fine in the -common package (which currently i firefox-3.0) [14:31] <asac> fta2: in that way things that use the abrowser commands will still work with firefox and vv. [14:32] <fta2> well, in /usr/bin, i don't like to add stuff that are not needed, like /usr/bin/abrowser* for people using plain ff3 [14:33] <asac> fta2: its a matter of compatibility. those scripts dont hurt [14:34] <asac> fta2: same argument would be true for abrowser. whipping firefox links everywhere but abrowser links not will make "abrowser" more a second class citizen then it already is [14:38] <asac> fta2: imo we should review how the branding split is packaged for jaunty [14:41] <fta2> it's now clean for the desktop file, and for icons. i just don't like all those links in usr/bin and usr/lib [14:42] <fta2> i don't expect that many users to switch to abrowser anyway, so 2nd class citizen is more than probable. [14:42] <asac> fta2: well. its a political thing [14:42] <asac> both need to be similar and all those links dont really hurt [14:42] <asac> they only serve for compatibility [14:42] <asac> users will only see the .desktop files [14:47] <fta2> http://paste.ubuntu.com/52853/ [14:48] <fta2> no idea how representative it is [14:49] <asac> fta2: its not ... ffox is installed by default ;) [14:49] <thunderstruck> 2nd class my ass i use it and like it ;) [14:49] <asac> but as i said. its not a matter of popularity. [14:50] <asac> the bidirectional links need to be in the -common package [14:50] <thunderstruck> asac: and you are right abrowser-3.0 doesnt work === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [14:51] <fta2> we have 125 times more people using the ff branding just in intrepid [14:52] <gnomefreak> ?? [14:52] <asac> that doesnt change the fact that both packages should be 100% equivalent [14:52] <asac> thats only achieved if abrowser links exist everywhere [14:52] * gnomefreak has no way of finding that percentage out [14:53] <gnomefreak> awesome-browser?? [14:53] <gnomefreak> is that abrowser? [14:53] <fta2> 6941 firefox-3.0-branding 4263 1255 0 3006 2 (Unknown) [14:53] <fta2> 33650 abrowser-3.0-branding 34 9 0 25 0 (Unknown) [14:53] <fta2> 4263/34 [14:53] <fta2> ~125 [14:53] <gnomefreak> where did you find that? [14:53] <fta2> popcon [14:54] <gnomefreak> oh [14:54] <asac> ok ... lunch and then coding NM [14:54] <gnomefreak> fta2: abrowser still gives you firefox-3.0 [14:54] <fta2> 26018 firefox-3.1-branding 118 36 0 82 0 (Unknown) [14:54] <fta2> 44115 abrowser-3.1-branding 7 1 0 6 0 (Unknown) [14:54] <fta2> 22665 firefox-3.1 197 32 45 120 0 (Unknown) [15:10] <gnomefreak> asac: care to tell the people on bug 87101 to back off. we fix it one way it pisses others off, cant win them all [15:10] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 87101 in thunderbird "when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87101 [15:17] <thunderstruck> this is starting to piss me off === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [15:17] <james_w> fta2: thanks, should be fixed in the next upload [15:29] <gnomefreak> !info libflashsupport intrepid [15:29] <ubottu> libflashsupport (source: libflashsupport): Support library for sound output of Flash 9+ with PulseAudio. In component universe, is extra. Version 1.9-0ubuntu2 (intrepid), package size 8 kB, installed size 64 kB [15:29] <gnomefreak> asac: do you plan pon removing libflashsupport from archives anymore? [15:31] <gnomefreak> s/pon/on [15:33] <asac> gnomefreak: i am waiting for feedback from ltsp on whether they still need that [15:34] <gnomefreak> k [15:34] <gnomefreak> people are making frigging wiki pages on how to fix the issue and i have strong feeling we are gonna get comments that that isnt the fix (because people dont know any better [15:35] <gnomefreak> )* [15:38] <gnomefreak> asac: i told guy on bug 255297 i would ping you [15:38] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 255297 in xulrunner-1.9 "please include debian patch to enable old certificates UI" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/255297 [15:41] <gnomefreak> !info flashplugin-nonfree hardy-backports [15:41] <ubottu> flashplugin-nonfree (source: flashplugin-nonfree): Adobe Flash Player plugin installer. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 10.0.1.218+10.0.0.525ubuntu1~hardy1+really9.0.124.0ubuntu2 (hardy-backports), package size 18 kB, installed size 164 kB (Only available for i386 amd64 lpia) [15:41] <asac> gnomefreak: when? [15:42] <asac> gnomefreak: i mean i am always in chpe's epiphany channel ;) [15:42] <asac> he could easily ping me there :) [15:42] <gnomefreak> i dont really know him but i said it on bug. my mail might have not gotten there yet [15:43] <asac> ah ok [15:55] <thunderstruck> asac: did you get my last post about tbird notification? [15:56] <asac> huh? [15:56] <asac> i dont think so [15:56] <asac> at least not here [16:01] <thunders1ruck> fuck this [16:02] <thunders1ruck> asac: in case you missed it [16:02] <thunders1ruck> .:10:50:35:. < gnomefreak > do we have notification for tbird restart after update? if not we should really think about this [16:04] <asac> thunders1ruck: yeah we dont have it yet [16:05] <thunders1ruck> k [16:05] <asac> but makes sense i agree === thunders1ruck is now known as gnomefreak [16:26] <thunderstruck> asac: do we have master bug on the the exec: 118: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/..... people are trying it with all different browser links. like sendible-browser [16:27] <thunderstruck> x-www-browser gets a different error [16:38] <asac> thunderstruck: thanks [16:38] <asac> thunderstruck: we should make a bug out of that [16:42] <thunderstruck> i opened the one i filed and marked all as dup and explained in bug what links fail [16:42] <thunderstruck> asac: bug 273907 [16:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 273907 in firefox-3.0 "abrowser does not start: :$pkglibdir/abrowser link missing" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/273907 [16:43] <thunderstruck> updated description === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [16:44] <gnomefreak> ok i really have to work on connection now. its getting old fast === asac_ is now known as asac [17:05] <asac> jcastro: did you reping blizzard? [17:06] <jcastro> asac: not yet, I will do so today [17:06] <jcastro> sorry I've been running around like a chicken with my head cut off. [17:08] <asac> jcastro: too points. ask him if he thinks that anyone would come. most likely those will come during UDS and not fosscamp (as its business day for them), right? [17:08] <asac> jcastro: i am trying to sort out if i need to be at fosscamp :) [17:11] <[reed]> asac: get mconnor to come? :) [17:19] <asac> [reed]: i asked him and he said he planned to be in MV around that time and would then consider to come [17:20] <[reed]> cool [18:02] <bfiller> asac: where can I find a version of firefox-3.0 with debug symbols? [18:03] <asac> bfiller: you can find debug symbols [18:03] <asac> bfiller: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#Crashes [18:03] <asac> adapt apt lines for intrepid accordingly [18:03] <bfiller> asac: thanks [18:05] <asac> bfiller: if you need a real debug build you need to build on your own [18:05] <asac> (e.g. with debug output and without optimization) [18:12] <asac> so now i became a ~ubuntu-mir team member :/ [18:56] <asac> james_w: http://paste.ubuntu.com/52925/ [18:56] <asac> james_w: thats the error i referred to the other day [18:57] <asac> building -sa complains about binary changes missing sometimes [20:27] <fta> asac, i tried to make head or tail from the gnash package, it's really awful [20:52] <fta> asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=935231 [21:12] <asac> fta: he? [21:12] <asac> i updated gnash.ubuntu.head today [21:12] <asac> should work [21:13] <fta> nm, it was a few days ago, i gave up and updated nf-flash instead :( [21:58] <fta> mozilla bug Bug 368428 [21:58] <ubottu> Error: Launchpad bug 368428 could not be found [21:58] <fta> mozilla bug 368428 [21:58] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 368428 in Networking: JAR "XUL FastLoad cache corruption when application running while upgrading" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368428 === `6og is now known as Kamping_Kaiser |