File size: 11,022 Bytes
4aa5fce
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
[02:02] <callmepk> good morning
[02:36] <jbicha> juliank: that might be bug 1873658, fixed in -proposed
[02:36] <ubot5> bug 1873658 in desktop-file-utils (Ubuntu Focal) "Deb Files are not associated with an application that manages packages" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873658
[02:43] <duflu> Morning callmepk 
[03:21] <callmepk> morning duflu 
[06:38] <didrocks> good morning
[06:38] <seb128> goood morning desktopers
[06:41] <duflu> Morning didrocks and seb128 
[06:41] <duflu> biab
[06:44] <didrocks> hey duflu, salut seb128 
[06:44] <seb128> hey duflu, salut didrocks, how are you?
[06:44] <didrocks> good, thanks, and yourself?
[06:45] <seb128> I'm good thanks!
[06:56] <ricotz> good morning
[06:57] <duflu> seb128, tired. We had just enough easing of restrictions for Mother's Day to go ahead. Though that probably doesn't explain it -- I slept heaps, just low quality
[06:57] <duflu> Hi ricotz 
[07:04] <marcustomlinson> morning desktoppers
[07:04] <didrocks> hey ricotz, marcustomlinson 
[07:06] <duflu> Hi marcustomlinson 
[07:07] <marcustomlinson> hwy didrocks and duflu
[07:10] <ricotz> hey duflu, didrocks, marcustomlinson, seb128 
[07:12] <callmepk> hi ricotz didrocks marcustomlinson seb128 
[07:20] <didrocks> hey callmepk 
[07:21] <marcustomlinson> hey hey ricotz and callmepk
[07:35] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers, happy Monday!
[07:39] <marcustomlinson> morning oSoMoN
[07:39] <oSoMoN> morning marcustomlinson 
[07:40] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN 
[07:40] <didrocks> happy Monday oSoMoN 
[07:41] <oSoMoN> hey duflu
[07:41] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks, ça va bien?
[07:43] <didrocks> oSoMoN: ça va bien, merci, et toi ? :)
[07:43] <oSoMoN> très bien
[07:44] <oSoMoN> I was just showing and explaining IRC to my 7yo daughter, and she couldn't stop laughing at my nickname :)
[07:44] <didrocks> ahah, unsure how insulted or proud you should be :)
[07:46] <oSoMoN> amused, that's all
[07:49] <ginggs> hi desktoppers, would someone please help me stop my PC suspending at the login screen? LP: #1874219
[07:49] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1874219 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) " PC suspends after 20 minutes at the login screen" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1874219
[07:49] <ginggs> it's a desktop PC, so is always on AC power
[07:51] <marcustomlinson> duflu: Interested to see the bug backlog graph this week :)
[07:51] <duflu> marcustomlinson, I got the impression you had done some things... Yeah I will update it before EOD
[08:02] <Laney> moin
[08:03] <didrocks> hey hey Laney 
[08:03] <oSoMoN> moin Laney 
[08:08] <duflu> Hi Laney
[08:08] <marcustomlinson> ginggs: left a comment on your bug
[08:08] <seb128> hey marcustomlinsonric callmepk, ricotz, how are you?
[08:08] <seb128> Laney, hey Laney, good long w.e?
[08:10] <ginggs> marcustomlinson: thanks, giving that a try
[08:11] <oSoMoN> salut seb128, ça va?
[08:12] <seb128> oSoMoN, ouais, ça va ! et toi ?
=== ondra_ is now known as ondra
=== clobrano6 is now known as clobrano
[08:16] <callmepk> seb128 : Pretty good! how are you?
[08:16] <seb128> callmepk, I'm good
[08:16] <oSoMoN> seb128, bien, merci!
[08:16] <seb128> shrug, libreoffice
[08:16] <oSoMoN> what's up with it?
[08:16] <oSoMoN> that help bug?
[08:16] <seb128> yes
[08:16] <seb128> I tried to upload the Debian package to a ppa unmodified
[08:17] <seb128> failed after 23 hours with a ENOSPACE in the ppa :/
[08:17] <Laney> hey didrocks oSoMoN duflu seb128 
[08:17] <seb128> the log has those 'no obvious way to instantiate implementation' warning though, which doesn't have in Debian
[08:17] <seb128> so I expect the config would have been buggy and then it's not a difference in the package but in the depends versions or toolchain
[08:18] <seb128> I also tried to disabled Bsymbolic-function since that often creates issues but no luck
[08:19] <ricotz> oSoMoN, seb128, this starts to look like some burried condition whether this is a "Debian" build
[08:20] <seb128> ricotz, those 'no obvious way to instantiate implementation'  warnings in the log are weird
[08:20] <seb128> also the resulting binaries are fine
[08:20] <ricotz> seb128, fyi http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/libreoffice/main.xcd.diff
[08:20] <seb128> it's just a config problem, copying main.xcd from Debian makes F1 call the webbrowser on the documentation
=== icey_ is now known as icey
[08:20] <ricotz> the last hunk looks pretty problematic
[08:21] <seb128> ricotz, the lack of all the DesktopBackend entries also no?
[08:21] <ricotz> maybe
[08:21] <seb128> and how did you manage to get a pretty diff like that :p
[08:22] <ricotz> but if replacements are not correctly filled this is a reall issue, which might not be restricted to main.xcd
[08:22] <seb128> right
[08:22] <seb128> numbertext is a diff with Debian
[08:23] <seb128> no?
[08:24] <seb128> I wish that Debian upload had successed in the ppa, it would have told me if those .xcd diff were still there
[08:26] <ricotz> seb128, it is a switch to the internal dep, so might be handled wrong by the libreoffice buildsystem
[08:26] <seb128> right
[08:42] <ginggs> marcustomlinson, seb128: thanks for your comments in the bug
[09:53] <duflu> Erm, yeah marcustomlinson you win (is that you?) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRDHPxGBHqM6XkT_S8ggtYfD0xchKSUD_z9PopNVE3G1rU05fVSnxDGcDsEstl7gu7N-tzCU6mLUp2V/pubchart?oid=254968654&format=interactive
[09:56] <marcustomlinson> duflu: boom
[09:56] <marcustomlinson> yeah cleaned out oldy mouldies
[09:56] <marcustomlinson> not without irritating a lot of people with all the bug mail of course
[09:57] <duflu> :
[09:57] <duflu> :
[09:57] <duflu> :
[09:57] <duflu> 🎤
[09:57] <duflu> That was your delayed mic drop
[09:57] <duflu> Nice
[09:58] <marcustomlinson> :)
[09:58] <Wimpress> Morning o/
[09:58] <duflu> marcustomlinson, I found in the past roughly 1 in 400 people got angry, which is sufficiently low
[09:58] <duflu> Morning Wimpress 
[09:58] <marcustomlinson> duflu: and I was actually quite surprised by the number of positive reactions from users too
[09:59] <marcustomlinson> I got a fair amount of "thank you for saying _something_ on this bug"
[10:00] <marcustomlinson> even some negative reactions turned positive when I took the time to apologise and they realised there was a human watching the bug
[10:00] <duflu> I assume it most mostly silence
[10:01] <marcustomlinson> mostly yes, but if someone did reply I owed it to them to reply as well
[10:03] <seb128> hey Wimpress, wb, had a good week off?
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[10:13] <duflu> marcustomlinson, that's amazing, thanks. I will also end my day on that good news
[10:13] <marcustomlinson> duflu: good night :)
[10:29] <ricotz> seb128, nevermind my comment about the $(instdir)
[10:29] <seb128> ricotz, oh?
[10:29] <seb128> it's resolved at runtime?
[10:30] <ricotz> seb128, $(insturl) is normal
[10:30] <ricotz> yes
[10:30] <seb128> k
[10:30] <seb128> k
[11:28] <jphilips> hi all. I came across this on twitter related to the software store in 20.04 and wanted to bring it to your attention if you weren't already aware of it
[11:28] <jphilips> https://twitter.com/itsfoss2/status/1259735657020370944
[11:30] <marcustomlinson> thanks for the heads up jphilips
[11:31] <jphilips> marcustomlinson: any time. was going to mention it in the #ubuntu-quality channel, but wasnt sure there were any ubuntu team members in there other than wimpy
[11:34] <ogra> jphilips, https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-store/+bug/1875450 most likely
[11:34] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1875450 in snap-store "Doesn't provide search info to gnome-shell overview > search" [Low,Confirmed]
[13:53] <ogra> seb128, here is a shiny little bug for your next evo upload https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1877852 ... :)
[13:53] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1877852 in evolution (Ubuntu) "Evolution not showing unread count in dock, missing build-dep" [Undecided,New]
[13:55] <seb128> ogra; hey, thanks, I wonder when we regressed that and how :/
[13:57] <jphilips> has there been any reports of snapd slowing shutdowns - https://twitter.com/j4yav/status/1259824398871257088
[13:58] <ogra> yeah ... 
[13:58] <ogra> it is shiny with that feature though ... 
[13:58] <ogra> ... and i was surprised how quick evo builds nowadays :)
[13:58] <ogra> jphilips, yes, a fix is in edge AFAIK
[13:59] <ogra> has been discussed on https://forum.snapcraft.io ... 
[14:00] <ogra> (and in the #snappy channel as well)
[14:01] <jphilips> ogra: thanks
[14:03] <ogra> jphilips, there is also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1877852
[14:03] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1877852 in evolution (Ubuntu) "Evolution not showing unread count in dock, missing build-dep" [Undecided,New]
[14:03] <ogra> err
[14:04] <ogra> sorry ... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873550
[14:04] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1873550 in snapd (Ubuntu) "Snappy daemon reaches 1min30s timeout during shutdown process" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[14:04] <ogra> silly copy/paste ... 
[14:05] <seb128> jphilips, please use launchpad for bug repiorts
[14:09] <oSoMoN> seb128, would you mind sponsoring https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/adwaita-icon-theme/-/commits/ubuntu/focal/ to focal, please?
[14:09] <jphilips> seb128: okay
[14:09] <seb128> oSoMoN, I can do that sure, thanks for working on the update :)
[14:09] <oSoMoN> np, it was an easy one
[14:11] <seb128> ogra, oh, that's a new feature in fact, nice. We provided that with evolution-indicator  ... did that one stop working for you? or did you just not have it installed?
[14:30] <ogra> seb128, i think one of the upgrades removed it ... (i didnt really stay long on 18.04, might have been that upgarde, I just used 18.04 to jump to 20.04 from 16.04)
[14:31] <seb128> ogra, can you try if reinstalling it fixes the issue without rebulding evolution?
[14:32] <seb128> ogra, would still be nicer to use the upstream variant but it's a bit annoying to enable, we are in sync with Debian and they don't have libunity so we would need to have a diff (or to get libunity to Debian ideally)
[14:33] <ogra> ah, k 
[14:33] <ogra> hmm, the indicator pulls in all the old gconf-2 stuff alongside
[14:34] <seb128> oh :(
[14:35] <seb128> the feature is minimal, it probably makes sense to enable it for focal in the next upload
[14:35] <seb128> less annoyance and better out of the box experience
[14:41] <ogra> seb128, yeah, seems to work ... the indicator should perhaps be a recommends ? 
[14:42] <seb128> ogra, I would rather avoid pulling gconf in by default, enabling the upstream support seems a better way
[14:43] <seb128> also better to maintain a one line control diff than maintaining an outdated source depending on gconf (which we will want to remove from the archive at some point)
[19:07] <ogra> seb128, well, i invalidated the bug anyway, guessing you might want to fix it in debian rather (once they pulled unity8 in they might also pull in libunity (IIRC even unity8 uses that)
[19:18] <seb128> ogra, right, libunity is standalone and would make sense there
[19:19] <ogra> +1