File size: 14,190 Bytes
4aa5fce
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
[01:40] <OerHeks> sarnold, what is <keyrcbot>
[01:41] <sarnold> OerHeks: I assume it's one of those annoying relaybot
[01:41] <sarnold> I haven't got a clue what's the other side of the relay :)
[01:41] <OerHeks> sort of tegramm?
[01:41] <OerHeks> i think it is not wanted, or maybe i am wrong
[01:42] <sarnold> they're moderately annoying, but so long as it appears to be used by just one person..
[01:42] <sarnold> every now and then someone wants to use a bot to join together oftc and freenode and matrix and telegram and .... NOOOO
[01:53] <leftyfb> gotta love the ones that profess their disdain for ubuntu and troll, yes insist they're there for help
[01:54] <leftyfb> he's begging for it
[02:33] <leftyfb> just got gigabit internet with an LTE failover modem. I just tested the failover, it's almost instant. Can't get over how nice this is.
[02:34] <sarnold> wow
[02:34] <sarnold> not at all what I'd expect
[02:41] <leftyfb> it fails over in less than a minute. Maybe 5 or 10 seconds or so. Mind you, the failover is part of the Ubiquiti USG (router) that I have. Nothing to do with the modem.
[02:42] <leftyfb> they even included a pretty decent APC UPS just for the LTE modem
[02:42] <leftyfb> now I just gotta get them to completely disable this "Security Edge" that apparently filters my DNS regardless if I have the service disabled or not. That isn't going to fly
[07:13] <lordievader> Good morning
[11:08] <lotuspsychje> good afternoon
[11:44] <TJ-> or morning :)
[11:46] <lotuspsychje> hey TJ-
[12:00] <daftykins> \o
[12:01] <TJ-> My apprentice is having fun building a complex RasPi project and hitting some interesting problems. Currently the LCD orientiation at boot-time won't rotate ... so now he's trying to assemble the pan-tilt camera unit. Extremely entertaining
[12:05] <daftykins> :)
[12:05] <daftykins> and no more trouser dropping thus far?
[12:06] <TJ-> LoL I best clear the screen before he sees that comment
[12:07] <daftykins> xD oops
[12:08] <daftykins> how's the weather up north? i've heard talk of a storm interrupting our shipping here to the islands but no sign of anything special
[12:14] <pizzaiolo> morning
[12:15] <daftykins> heya
[12:21] <TJ-> Sunny here as far as I can tell :)
[12:26] <pizzaiolo> mist and light rain here, aka free car wash
[12:32] <jeremy31> Just cold here 0F
[12:33] <daftykins> it's always very mild here on Guernsey, 11 deg C today
=== xamithanx is now known as xamithan
[17:15] <pragmaticenigma> !19.04
[17:15] <ubot5> Ubuntu 19.04 (Disco Dingo) is the 30th release of Ubuntu, supported until January 2020.  Release Notes: http://ubottu.com/y/dingo
[17:18] <leftyfb> interesting how it just says "January". No actual date
[17:18] <pragmaticenigma> yeah.. but it's enough for me to say no go
[17:19] <pragmaticenigma> it's 9 months from release... so techincally 2020-01-18 ??
[17:19] <leftyfb> 2 more days os support! :)
[17:19] <tomreyn> there was an announcement on the ubuntu-announce mailing lit providing the exact date
[17:20] <tomreyn> *liSt
[17:20] <pragmaticenigma> lit up!
[17:20] <tomreyn> leftyfb: so, about subone / unclean ntfs, you're saying disabling windows "fast startup" (Control Panel > Hardware and Sound > Power Options > System Setting > Choose what the power buttons do and uncheck the Turn on fast startup box) is no longer needed?
[17:20] <pragmaticenigma> oh... that's needed
[17:20] <leftyfb> tomreyn: it'll certainly help, but it won't fix the issue. And it won't always prevent the issue.
[17:21] <tomreyn> ok, took me a while to re-find that so i didn't tell subone in time before they left. we should do so if / when they return
[17:21] <tomreyn> https://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/what-is-fast-startup-windows-8-disable-it/
[17:22] <tomreyn> also the RTC registry patch may be nice to have
[17:22] <tomreyn> s/RTC/UTC/
[17:22] <tomreyn> for making windows not set loccal time on the HW clock
[17:23] <daftykins> i always used to go the other way and tell 'buntu to leave it alone ;)
[17:24] <tomreyn> you can do that, but that feels wrong to me. :)
[17:24] <pragmaticenigma> I know that Windows being left in it's hybrid sleep states, or hibernate has always causes Ubuntu to think the drive was "unclean"
[17:25] <pragmaticenigma> I thought fast boot just left a marker in the firmware to boot directly to windows at net start up... didn't know it also left the drive in any unclean state
[17:25] <tomreyn> HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\TimeZoneInformation
[17:25] <tomreyn> i mean https://askubuntu.com/questions/232405/how-do-i-set-my-clock-in-windows-to-utc-localtime
[17:25] <pragmaticenigma> that's a handy link
[17:26] <leftyfb> people should never be hibernating. With any OS. It NEVER works 100% as it should. There is always something no put back right or something in a weird state. With SSD's and PC's the way they are today, you're really not saving yourself that much time anyway
[17:28] <tomreyn> explanation of the need for fast startup https://askubuntu.com/questions/452071/why-disable-fast-boot-on-windows-8-when-having-dual-booting
[17:28] <tomreyn> uh, i mean the need to disable fast startup
[17:28] <tomreyn> not strictly needed, but i think you want to on dual-boot with shared file systems
[17:34] <leftyfb> oh man, SO happy. Got my ISP to remove that "Security Edge" (DNS filtering) without affecting my bundle price ... AND it even brought my bill down a little bit
[17:35] <daftykins> i agree, sleep and hibernate are a waste of time
[17:35] <daftykins> leftyfb: how long was the call? :) was it a known evil ISP?
[17:40] <leftyfb> daftykins: I got a good rep. Knew exactly what I was asking for and looked up the agreement and said he didn't see anything requiring that service as part of the bundle. And yes, it's that ISP
[17:40] <leftyfb> unfortunately, unless I want DSL, it's my only option
[17:40] <daftykins> pesky 'murica, mad how things got that way
[17:41] <leftyfb> The call was 14 minutes but also included some banter
[17:41] <pragmaticenigma> leftyfb: Can you not configure your own DNS provider for your network?
[17:41] <leftyfb> I'm SO excited about the LTE backup modem. I've tested it twice now and it's just about instant failover
[17:42] <leftyfb> pragmaticenigma: I can, but Comcast routes all traffic to their filtering system regardless, then out to your configured nameserver. This is why I wanted it removed.
[17:42] <daftykins> interesting, i've got a Huawei 5G router trial setup up at a clients right now - i moved all their home network onto it instead of their 40/5 Mb VDSL2
[17:42] <leftyfb> sorry, all DNS traffic
[17:43] <leftyfb> daftykins: the cable modem and LTE modem are both plugged into my Ubiquiti gateway as a failover relationship
[17:43] <daftykins> that the USG?
[17:43] <daftykins> seen those but quite happy with pfsense on amd APU boards myself :D
[17:45] <pragmaticenigma> leftyfb: I did not know that... though I've switched my DNS server over to a DNSCrypt provider... not sure they can touch that one
[17:45] <pragmaticenigma> *forwarding dns server
[17:46] <leftyfb> daftykins: yeah, the USG
[17:46] <pragmaticenigma> leftyfb: How would someone know if that is enabled on their connection or not?
[17:46] <daftykins> surely it's on your ISP accounts in some fashion o0
[17:46] <leftyfb> pragmaticenigma: they can. It's all DNS (port 53) traffic. It all gets routed through their servers regardless of how you have it configured. Unless you're not using port 53
[17:47] <leftyfb> pragmaticenigma: I THINK There might be some tracing you can do, but I found out from a tier 2 rep at Comcast.
[17:47] <leftyfb> "Web Filter Protection is now off.To safeguard your network, Malware, Phishing and Botnet Protection remains on."
[17:47] <leftyfb> that is pretty telling
[17:48] <pragmaticenigma> Where do you find that leftyfb ?
[17:48] <leftyfb> pragmaticenigma: in the SecurityEdge portal
[17:48] <leftyfb> https://securityedge.comcast.com/ after disabling the web filtering in the top right
[17:48] <pragmaticenigma> is that accessable through the main customer service/account site?
[17:48] <leftyfb> yeah, if you have the service
[17:49] <leftyfb> I'm not sure it's available to residential accounts. I have a business account
[17:49] <pragmaticenigma> ah, it's only for business... yeah, I'm residential
[17:49] <leftyfb> I do some web and email hosting. I've got 13 static ip's
[17:50] <leftyfb> been doing it for about 20 years now :)
[17:50] <pragmaticenigma> that would explain why you wouldn't want their edge router filtering enabled
[17:50] <leftyfb> god knows what they prevent that I have no control over
[17:51] <pragmaticenigma> as for my setup... I'm not sure what port dnscrypt uses... if comcast is doing any filtering, it hasn't been a problem for my purposes though
[17:51] <pragmaticenigma> *so far
[17:51] <leftyfb> looks like 443
[17:51] <leftyfb> spiffy
[17:52] <pragmaticenigma> As far as my network is concerned, PiHole is my local forwarding DNS provider, and I have that pointed to an instance of DNSCrypt, which then uses the DNSCrypt protocol to query my DNS provider
[17:53] <leftyfb> yeah, I had a pihole and it did a VERY weird thing to my network so I ripped it out. I might give it another try
[17:53] <pragmaticenigma> So if there was any filtering going on at Comcast, for my network, my setup and settings are probably catching it way before theirs do
[17:53] <pragmaticenigma> leftyfb: I had a weird issue, but that was when I enabled conditional forwarding
[17:54] <leftyfb> for some reason (and it makes absolutely no sense), after a while, ALL outbound DNS traffic would stop. Regardless if I reconfigured a device to use an external nameserver. Only when I turned it off and rebooted my USG did I get dns traffic back. Makes no sense at all
[17:55] <pragmaticenigma> almost sounds like what I just descibed... Conditional Forwarding was pinging my router for the DHCP registered host names... my router was just fowarding those requests back to the PiHole... created a loop
[17:55] <pragmaticenigma> I'd find that I had billions of requests overnight
[17:55] <pragmaticenigma> and dns responses were timing out
[17:55] <leftyfb> maybe I'll look into that and give it another try
[17:56] <pragmaticenigma> I really enjoy when friends come over and hop on my guest network and then can't do half the stuff they're used to
[17:56] <pragmaticenigma> google searches are really fun for them
[17:57] <pragmaticenigma> "click on first result.. which is always a Google ad" won't let them through
[17:57] <leftyfb> yeah, I have the pihole setup at my fathers house. He said things were broken for this ^^^ same reason
[17:57] <leftyfb> I had to explain to him
[17:57] <leftyfb> first I showed him what it would take to allow them to work
[17:58] <pragmaticenigma> I got tired of getting snared by it, I switched to using DuckDuckGo for searching now
[17:58] <leftyfb> after whitelisting 5 forwarded clickad sites, we gave up
[17:59] <pragmaticenigma> The one item that's on the filtering list is geoip... which I can't figure out why... having that blocked disables so many things
[17:59] <pragmaticenigma> especially streaming providers
[20:57] <pragmaticenigma> !grub
[20:57] <ubot5> GRUB2 is the default Ubuntu boot manager. Lost GRUB after installing Windows? See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestoreGrub - For more information and troubleshooting for GRUB2 please refer to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2
[20:58] <pragmaticenigma> !restore
[23:31] <sarnold> tomreyn: I suspect you're right, I don't see any -oem kernels on the kernel sru dashboard https://kernel.ubuntu.com/sru/dashboards/web/kernel-stable-board.html
[23:31] <tomreyn> sarnold: oh nice, i've never seen this.
[23:32] <sarnold> the baffling array of kernels makes a lot more sense after seeing this :)
[23:32] <tomreyn> sarnold: there are linux-oem's though, if only in 18.04
[23:33] <tomreyn> and focal
[23:33] <sarnold> tomreyn: I thought I left out part of that sentence when writing it.. sigh :)
[23:33] <tomreyn> so i guess that's what you mean
[23:33] <sarnold> yeah
[23:33] <sarnold> no -oems except in the LTSes
[23:33] <tomreyn> yes. but.. then i guess users' should be warned not to upgrade to 9m releases
[23:34] <tomreyn> anyways, surely someone has thought of this ;)
[23:34] <sarnold> fully agreed
[23:34] <sarnold> I'm not sure they have
[23:34] <TJ-> But it's Dell !
[23:34] <TJ-> "only LTS"
[23:35]  * tomreyn notes trolling attempt
[23:35] <sarnold> do-release-upgrade probably requires -d to take those steps but it's not at all clear that on those oem machines it's a BAD IDEA and elsewhere it's just "have fun upgrading every six months for two years"
[23:35] <tomreyn> well there's a gui where you can just switch what you'Re tracking, and there are most likely no warnings about it doing that
[23:36] <sarnold> I think it's even worse than that, I've heard some of those machines are basically locked to that release / ppa / and there's NO PLAN AT ALL for migrating off of it
[23:36] <tomreyn> software-properties-gtk --open-tab=2
[23:36] <tomreyn> did i meantion i plan to migrate to debian?
[23:37] <TJ-> sarnold: yes, that's how I understand it ... and often its only 1 LTS (the one at release time)
[23:37] <sarnold> tomreyn: aw :( we'll miss you
[23:37] <tomreyn> but i'm really trying hard to make sure that's not the case!
[23:38] <sarnold> I don't think I'll ever buy any of those 'ubuntu preinstalled' systemns. those 'enabled' repos feel pretty poorly managed to me -- not all the oems want to pay for getting the enablements necessary into upstream projects or similar
[23:39] <tomreyn> -oem was probably another potential source of revenue that was just too attractive. but, yes, i'm not sure this pays off in the long run.
[23:40] <TJ-> it's another strand of the 'embedded' kernel world really
[23:40] <tomreyn> unbreakable linux?
[23:40] <TJ-> feels rather like the Android kernel/device situation
[23:41] <TJ-> out-of-tree/hard-to-find-source modules/tweaks
[23:41] <tomreyn> a recipe for a prolonged headache
[23:42] <tomreyn> unless you can just throw load of money on it for 3 years (then dump it) because you're google, of course.